Redding City Council
January 17, 2023

Temecula – Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
San Francisco – Regional Office
870 Market Street, Suite 1223
San Francisco, CA 94102
California Satellite Offices
Atascadero, Davis
Joshua Tree
www.nbsgov.com
City of Redding
Utility Rate Program Update
Final Report
February 2020
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) This page intentionally left blank.

Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 TOC
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
Section 1. Executive Summary 1
A. Background and Purpose .................................................................................................. 1 B. Key Findings....................................................................................................................... 1 C. Frequently Asked Questions About the Rate Study.......................................................... 2 D. Study Recommendations .................................................................................................. 3 Section 2. Overview of the Study Methodology 4
Section 3. Water Rate Study 8
A. Developing Recommended Water Rates.......................................................................... 8 B. Water Utility Revenue Requirements............................................................................... 8 C. Characteristics of Water Customers by Class.................................................................. 11 D. Cost-of-Service Analysis .................................................................................................. 12 E. Current vs. Proposed Water Rate Structures.................................................................. 14 F. Comparison of Current and Proposed Monthly Bills ...................................................... 15 Section 4. Wastewater Rate Study 18
A. Developing Recommended Wastewater Rates............................................................... 18 B. Wastewater Utility Revenue Requirements.................................................................... 18 C. Cost-of-Service Analysis .................................................................................................. 20 D. Current vs. Proposed Wastewater Rates........................................................................ 20 Section 5. Solid Waste Rate Study 23
A. Key Solid Waste Rate Study Issues.................................................................................. 23 B. Solid Waste Utility Revenue Requirements .................................................................... 23 C. Customer Class Characteristics and Cost-of-Service....................................................... 25 D. Rate Design and Proposed Solid Waste Rates ................................................................ 28 Section 6. Recommendations and Next Steps 35
Section 7. Abbreviations and Acronyms 37
Appendix A – Additional Water Rate Study Tables 39
Appendix B – Additional Wastewater Rate Study Tables 53 Appendix C – Additional Solid Waste Rate Study Tables 60 Appendix D – Additional Single-Family Residential Bill Comparisons 80 Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 TOF
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding

TABLE OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE
Figure 1. Recommended Annual Rate Increases..........................................................................................1 Figure 2. Primary Components of a Rate Study............................................................................................4 Figure 3. Summary of Water Revenue Requirements ...............................................................................10 Figure 4. Summary of Water Reserve Funds ..............................................................................................11 Figure 5. Water Consumption by Customer Class .....................................................................................11 Figure 6. Peaking Factors by Customer Class .............................................................................................12 Figure 7. Number of Accounts by Customer Class .....................................................................................12 Figure 8. Summary of Rate Revenue Requirements ..................................................................................13 Figure 9. Summary of Adjusted Rate Revenue Requirements by Customer Class ....................................13 Figure 10. Current and Proposed Water Rates for Fiscal Years 2019/20 – 2022/23 .................................14 Figure 11. Monthly Water Bill Comparison for SFR Customers .................................................................15 Figure 12. Regional Monthly Water Bill Comparisons................................................................................16 Figure 13. Nor-Cal Monthly Water Bill Comparisons .................................................................................16 Figure 14. Monthly Water Bill Comparison for Commercial Users ............................................................17 Figure 15. Summary of Wastewater Revenue Requirements ....................................................................19 Figure 16. Summary of Wastewater Reserve Funds ..................................................................................20 Figure 17. Current and Proposed Wastewater Rates for Fiscal Year 2019/20 – 2022/23 ........................21 Figure 18. Regional Monthly Single-Family Wastewater Bill Comparisons................................................21 Figure 19. Nor-Cal Monthly Single-Family Wastewater Bill Comparisons..................................................22 Figure 20. Summary of the Revenue Requirements for the Solid Waste Utility .......................................24 Figure 21. Summary of the Reserve Funds for the Solid Waste Utility ......................................................25 Figure 22. Summary of Solid Waste Tonnage Allocation Factors ..............................................................25 Figure 23. Comparison of Solid Waste Tonnages .......................................................................................26 Figure 24. Summary of Solid Waste Account/Pickups-Per-Week Allocation Factors ................................26 Figure 25. Comparison of Solid Waste Account/Pickups-Per-Week...........................................................26 Figure 26. Summary of Solid Waste Combined Allocation Factors.............................................................27 Figure 27. Summary of Solid Waste Allocation Methodology ..................................................................27 Figure 28. Summary of Revenue Requirements by Customer Class...........................................................28 Figure 29. Summary of Current vs. Proposed Revenue Requirements by Customer Class........................28 Figure 32. Monthly Single-Family Solid Waste Bill Comparison with Other Communities .......................30 Figure 33. Summary of Calculated Unit Costs for Commercial Services ...................................................31 Figure 34. Summary of Commercial Service Rates.....................................................................................32 Figure 35. Summary of Roll-Off Service Costs ............................................................................................33 Figure 36. Summary of Roll-Off Service Rates ...........................................................................................33 Figure 37. Proposed Monthly Cannabis Rates............................................................................................34 Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 1
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 1. Executive Summary
A. Background and Purpose
Background – The City of Redding (City) provides water, wastewater and solid waste services to its residents and commercial businesses, and last updated rates for these services in 2016 after NBS prepared cost-of-service rate studies. The City again retained NBS in October 2018 to update these studies as well as review alternative rate structures and consider other rate-related issues, such as funding capital improvements and changes in costs and how costs are allocated to each customer class.

Purpose – The overall purpose of this study is to provide a thorough review of rates and confirm the City’s broader rate-related goals and objectives, including key financial parameters. Rate studies in general should reflect the City’s unique characteristics and provide sustainable plans for each utility that promote long-term revenue stability, while also ensuring overall fairness and equity.

The rates developed and discussed in this report are intended to meet the requirements of Proposition 218 (Prop 218), originally referred to as the “Right to Vote on New Taxes Act,” 1 and were developed in a
manner that is consistent with industry standards. This report is also part of the City’s continuing effort to promote transparent communications with the residents and businesses it serves and to document the basis for adopting new rates as required under Prop 218.

In developing the proposed utility rates, NBS and City staff worked cooperatively in evaluating various rate alternatives and developing study recommendation. After review by the City’s Utility Rate Advisory Group (URAG), NBS and City staff refined the study results and rate alternatives which are reflected in the recommendations to the City Council.

B. Key Findings
Revenue Requirements and Projected Rates – Although all three utilities are financially sound, both the water and wastewater utilities are facing rising costs and significant long-term capital improvements.

Without the recommended rates increases, these utilities would see annuals deficits by the end of the 4- year period and would make it difficult to complete ongoing capital projects and maintain healthy reserve levels. The proposed rate increases, or more specifically the increases in the total rate revenue collected each year, are shown in Figure 1. It is important to understand that a 4-percent sewer rate increase shown in Figure 1 does not mean all sewer rates increase by 4 percent; due to the cost-of-service analysis, individual sewer rates, such as residential vs. commercial, may increase by more or less than 4 percent.

Figure 1. Recommended Annual Rate Increases
Utility FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Water 4% 4% 4% 4%
Sewer 4% 4% 4% 4%
Solid Waste 3% 3% 3% 3%

1 California Constitution article XIII D, Section 6 (commonly called Proposition 218, also referred to as Prop 218). The City’s attorney provided the opinion that recommended rates comply with Prop 218.

Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 2
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Water Rates – During that last rate study, California was in a “state of emergency” due to a severe drought and water shortages.
2 Since then, the City’s annual consumption levels have been steadily increasing, although new per-capita standards may affect future consumption levels and raise questions about whether they will ever return to “normal levels.” Because of this, NBS and City staff carefully considered the projected consumption levels along with the significant capital repair and replacement needs when developing the proposed rates and the 4-percent rate increases. Along with the Water Utility’s capital reserves, these rates will allow the City to fund necessary capital improvements. Even with the recommended rate increases, customer bills still compare favorably to other communities in the region.

At this time, continuing with the City’s current uniform-tier rate design is recommended. This is based on advice from the City’s attorney during the last rate study related to legal concerns about recent court rulings,
3 as well as concerns about conservation-related revenue instability that can be intensified by tiered rates.

Wastewater Rates – The current wastewater rate design was largely retained, with 4% annual rate increases recommended for each of the next four years. While the City’s sewer rates are not the highest in the regional comparison provided in Section 4, they are on the higher end when compared to other communities in the region.

Solid Waste Rates – The full cost-of-service study performed in 2016 evaluated cost allocations for equipment, administration, transfer station operations, street sweeping, and disposal services. Compared to the results of the 2016 study, the percentage of costs allocated to various customer classes has shifted slightly due to higher than normal, and unexpected, increases in the “cost-of-service” of commercial vs. residential customers, as explained in more detail in Sections 2 and 5. These kinds of changes also explain larger increases in commercial vs. residential rates and why rates do not increase in an “across-the-board” manner in the first year of rate adjustments. The proposed solid waste rates still compare favorably with other communities in the region.

C. Frequently Asked Questions About the Rate Study
Members of the general public, who are not typically familiar with utility rate studies, often have basic questions about what the rate study is and how it might affect their monthly utility bills. This section on frequently asked questions is an attempt to answer those basic questions.

Q: What is a rate study and why was it done? A: This rate study is a comprehensive analysis of the City’s water, wastewater and solid waste rates (“utility rates”) that addresses a number of key factors, such as the financial plan and revenue requirements, the cost-of-service for each customer class, and the fairness and equity of the rate design.

2 State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2017-0024, Paragraph 16 states: “On April 7, 2017, the Governor issued Executive Order B-40-17, directing the State Water Board to rescind portions of its existing emergency regulations that require a water supply stress test or mandatory conservation standard for urban water agencies.” 3 See Capistrano Taxpayers Association V. City of San Juan Capistrano, Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division three, April 18, 2016.

This court ruling requires that tiered water rates demonstrate a clear “cost-basis”.

Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 3
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Q: How was the study conducted and who was involved? A: The City selected and retained NBS in 2018 to work with City staff to begin evaluating its utility rates. During this process, the City’s Utility Rate Advisory Group (URAG) reviewed the initial study results and provided recommendations to City staff and the City Council. After the public hearings are held to discuss the proposed rates, the City Council will ultimately decide whether or not to adopt the new utility rates.

What are the benefits of conducting such a study? A: First and foremost, it provides an independent, unbiased evaluation of the City’s utility rates. The study reviews the fairness and equity of the water, wastewater and solid waste utility rates among the customer classes which are key requirements of Prop 218. The utility rate models are also intended to both document the study and ensure that the City’s utility rates are properly aligned with generally accepted rate study methodology.

What were the results of the rate study? A: The study resulted in several findings: (1) the water and wastewater utilities show that they will need rate increases in order to generate enough rate revenue to effectively fund capital projects and maintain adequate reserve levels; (2) the solid waste utility will continue to run annual deficits without the recommended rate increases; (3) moderate increases in rate revenue are recommended for each utility over the next four years in order to maintain their financial health; and lastly, (4) no changes to the overall rate structures of the utilities are being recommended.

How and when will the recommended rate changes be implemented? A: In order to implement the new rates, the City will need to: (1) mail written notices of the proposed rate adjustments to property owners as mandated by Prop 218, and (2) after a 45-day protest period, hold a public hearing to adopt and implement the new rates. Assuming there is no successful challenge during the Prop 218 process, the City Council would implement the new rates in March 2020.

How can someone learn more about the rate study and the URAG’s recommendations? A: The City’s website4 provides useful information about the rate study and the presentations and reports made before the URAG and the City Council on this topic.

D. Study Recommendations
NBS recommends the City take the following actions:
 Review and adopt the long-term financial plans for the water, wastewater and solid waste utilities.  Evaluate current reserve fund targets and adjust based on NBS’ recommendations or per industry standards.
 Retain the City’s current rate design for the water, wastewater and solid waste utilities.  Conduct a legal review of the proposed rates.
 Proceed with Prop 218 noticing requirements and the 45-day protest period.  Assuming a successful Prop 218 process (that is, there is no majority protest of the rates), adopt the rates summarized in this report.

The next section discusses the rate study.

4 http://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/public-works-utilities Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 4
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 2. Overview of the Study Methodology
Comprehensive rate studies, such as this one, typically include three components: (1) preparation of a financial plan which identifies the net revenue requirements for the utility; (2) analysis of the cost to service each customer class; and, (3) the rate structure design. These steps are shown in Figure 2 and are intended to follow industry standards and reflect the fundamental principles of cost-of-service rate-making embodied in the American Water Works Association (AWWA) manual, Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges,
5 also referred to as Manual M1.

Figure 2. Primary Components of a Rate Study
1 FINANCIAL
PLAN 2
COST-OFSERVICE

ANALYSIS
3 RATE DESIGN

ANALYSIS
Compares current sources and
uses of funds and determines
the revenue needed from rates
and projects rate adjustments.

Proportionately allocates the
revenue requirements to the
customer classes in compliance with
industry standards and State Law.

Considers what rate structure
will best meet the City’s need to
collect rate revenue from each
customer class.

This methodology also addresses requirements under Prop 218 that rates not exceed the cost of providing the service and be proportionate to the cost of providing service to all customers. In terms of the chronology of the study, these three steps represent the order in which they were performed in this study for all three utilities.

As part of this rate study, NBS projected revenues and expenditures, developed net revenue requirements, performed cost-of-service rate analyses, and prepared new utility rates for the City to consider. Annual rate increases – or more accurately, increases in the total revenue collected from rates – are recommended for each utility.

The City provided NBS with the data necessary to conduct the studies, including historical, current and projected revenues and expenditures, number of customer accounts, and water consumption data along with other operational and capital cost information.

Rate Design Criteria – It is important for utilities to send proper price signals to its customers about the actual cost of providing service. This objective is typically addressed through both the magnitude of the rates and the rate structure design. In other words, both the amount of revenue collected and the way in which the revenue is collected from customers are important.

Several criteria are typically considered in setting rates and developing sound rate structures. The fundamentals of this process have been well documented in a number of rate-setting manuals, such as

5 Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges, Manual of Water Supply Practices, M1, AWWA, seventh edition, 2017.

Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 5
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding James C. Bonbright’s Principles of Public Utility Rates6 which outlines pricing policies, theories, and economic concepts along with various rate designs.

The following is a simplified list of the attributes of a sound rate structure that applies to most water, wastewater and solid waste utilities:
 Rates should be easy to understand from the customer’s perspective.  Rates should be easy to administer from the utility’s perspective.  Rates should promote the efficient allocation of the resource.  Rates should be equitable and non-discriminating (i.e., cost based).  There should be continuity in the rate making philosophy over time.  Other utility policies should be considered (e.g., encouraging conservation and economic development).
 Rates should consider the customer’s ability to pay.
 Rates should provide month-to-month and year-to-year revenue stability.

Rate Structure Terminology – One of the most fundamental points in considering rate structures is the relationship between fixed costs and variable costs. The vast majority of water and wastewater rate structures contain a fixed, or minimum charge, and a volumetric charge, while solid waste rates have similar assumptions built into the per-container rates.

The City’s rate design criteria are unique to the characteristics of its utilities. The following discussion summarizes general industry rate study practices in California.

Fixed Charges – Fixed charges can be called base charges, minimum monthly charges, customer charges, fixed meter charges, etc. Although fixed charges are typically a significant percentage of the utility’s overall cost structure, utilities rarely collect 100% of their fixed costs through fixed charges. In general, customers prefer to be charged on a volumetric basis, as there is an inherent equity in a “pay-for-what-you-use” philosophy.

For a water utility, fixed charges typically increase by meter size. For example, a customer with a 2" meter may have a fixed meter charge that is eight times greater than the 5/8” or 3/4” meter based on its safe operating capacity.7 Because a large portion of water utility costs are typically related to meeting capacity requirements, individual capacity demands are important in establishing equitable rates for customers.

Variable (Consumption-Based) Charges – In contrast, variable costs, such as the cost of electricity used in pumping water and the chemicals used in the water and wastewater treatment facilities, tend to change with the quantity of water produced (or wastewater effluent treated). For a water utility, variable charges are generally based on metered consumption and charged on a dollar-per-unit cost (per Hundred Cubic Feet, or CCF, in the City’s case). Wastewater volumetric rates often rely on metered water consumption, which can serve as a proxy for sanitary sewer effluent generation.

6 James C. Bonbright, Albert L. Danielsen, and David R. Kamerschen, Principles of Public Utility Rates, (Arlington, VA: Public Utilities Report, Inc., Second Edition, 1988), p. 383-384.
7 Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges, Manual of Water Supply Practices, M1, AWWA, seventh edition, 2017, pp. 151-152.

Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 6
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding There are significant variations in the basic philosophy of rate structure alternatives for variable charges.

For instance, under a uniform (single-tier) rate structure, the cost per unit does not change with consumption and the rate design provides a straightforward approach that is easy to understand from the customer’s perspective and simple to administer from the utility’s perspective.

Key Financial Assumptions – The following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the water, wastewater and solid waste rate analyses. Capital and operational reserve fund targets reflect input from City staff in order to meet specific utility objectives.  Funding Capital Projects – The analysis for all three utilities assumes:
 Capital costs attributable to existing customers are funded with rate revenue.  Capital costs attributable to growth are assumed to be funded through development impact fee revenue.
 All capital projects listed in the financial plans are the City’s projections.  Reserve Targets for Water – Reserves for operations and capital needs are set at levels jointly recommended by City staff and NBS. Reserve targets used in the analysis are as follows:
 Operating and Maintenance Reserve – One hundred and twenty (120) days of operating expenses.
 Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement Reserve – Equal to 5% minimum of the water utility’s total expenses (i.e., O&M, Personnel, Interdepartmental, Debt Service, and Capital Expenditures). For most other utilities, capital reserves are based on a percentage of net asset values according to industry standards.
 Reserve Targets for Wastewater – Reserves for operations and capital needs are set at levels recommended by City staff and NBS:
 Operating and Maintenance Reserve – Ninety (90) days of operating expenses which adheres to industry standards.
 Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement Reserve – The reserve target is set at 8% of operating expenses plus $1 million capital. The typical industry standard target is based on a selected percentage of infrastructure replacement values.  Reserve Targets for Solid Waste – Reserves for operations and capital needs are set at levels recommended by City staff and NBS:
 Operating and Maintenance Reserve – Ninety (90) days of operating expenses less administrative costs and utility expenses, such as tipping fees.  Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement Reserve – Equal to 7% of net assets which assumes an average asset life expectancy of approximately 14 years. This represents rolling stock and larger equipment used in transfer station and processing activities.  Solid Waste Rolling Stock Purchases – All rolling stock purchases for the solid waste utility will be paid from reserves or rates; no debt financing is assumed.  Inflation and Growth Projections (per City estimates):

Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 7
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding  General inflation – 3% annually for water and wastewater and 2.5% for solid waste.  Customer growth – Averages 0.34% annually for all utilities.  Labor cost inflation – 3% annually for water and wastewater and 3.5% for solid waste.

The next three sections discuss the water, wastewater and solid waste rate studies in further detail.

Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 8
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 3. Water Rate Study
A. Developing Recommended Water Rates
The water rate analysis was undertaken with a few specific objectives, including:
 Generating sufficient revenue needed to meet projected capital funding requirements;  Providing revenue stability;
 Providing equity among customer classes; and,
 Incorporating projected water consumption levels.

NBS developed several water rate alternatives as requested by City staff over the course of this study. All rate structure alternatives were developed using industry standards and cost-of-service principles. The rate alternative recommended in this report was selected by City staff with input from the Utility Rate Advisory Group. This analysis includes the following basic components:
 Developing Cost Allocations: The water revenue requirements were “functionalized” into three categories: (1) customer service costs; (2) fixed capacity costs; and, (3) variable (or volume-based) costs. Unit costs for each of these functions were determined based on the allocations to functional areas, water consumption, peaking factors, number of accounts by meter size, and customer class.
 Determining Revenue Requirements by Customer Class: The total revenue that should be collected from each customer class was determined using the costs allocated to each class. For example, customer costs are allocated based on the number of meters, while volume-related costs are allocated based on the water consumption of each class. Once the costs are allocated and the net revenue requirement for each customer class is determined, collecting the revenue requirements from each customer class is addressed within the rate design.  Rate Design and Fixed vs. Variable Costs: Fixed costs, such as customer service, billing, and general administrative costs, are typically collected through a fixed monthly charge, while variable costs,such as pumping costs and water supply, are typically collected through volumetric charges.

California law8 and industry practices provide flexibility regarding the actual percentages collected from fixed vs. variable rates. After evaluating various rate alternatives, the current rate structure that recovers 60% of revenue from variable charges and 40% from fixed charges is recommended based on input from City staff and the URAG.

B. Water Utility Revenue Requirements
It is important for municipal utilities to maintain reasonable reserves in order to handle emergencies, fund working capital, maintain a good credit rating, and generally follow sound financial management

8 For example, AB 2882 allows a variety of conservation-oriented rate structures, including tiered water rates. While the California Urban Water Conservation Council recommends recovering 70 percent of rate revenue through volume-based rates, water utilities generally develop their own policy and conservation objectives which the City has done in this case.

Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 9
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding practices. Rate increases are governed by the need to meet these objectives. The current state of the City’s water utility, with regard to these objectives, is as follows:
 Expected Consumption: At the time of the last study, the City asked for extraordinary conservation (36 percent) from its customers in accordance with the State mandate. Between March 2015 and February of 2016, only 8.1 million CCF of water was sold which equates to a 24% reduction in water consumption compared to 2013 levels as a direct result of the City’s conservation efforts. That State mandate has since been rescinded and consumption levels have returned to the levels from before the mandate. This recent increase in consumption has a discernable impact on the budgeted rate revenue. After careful consideration and review of the water utility’s Proforma, the rate study used 10 million CCF9 as the best estimate for projecting the rate revenue that should be collected from volumetric charges.  Meeting Operating Costs: For Fiscal Years 2019/20 through 2022/23, the net revenue requirement (i.e., total annual expenses plus debt service and rate-funded capital costs, less nonrate revenues) is estimated to be approximately $15.2 to $23.6 million. If no rate increases are implemented, the City would continue to generate enough revenue to cover operating costs and planned capital improvements. However, by FY 2022/23, the City would be faced with annual deficits that would only increase over time and require more aggressive rate increases in the future.
 Maintaining Adequate Bond Coverage: The City is required by its bond covenant to maintain a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.20 for the water utility’s share of the outstanding 2013 Revenue Bonds. The added benefit of maintaining a higher coverage ratio is that it strengthens the City’s credit rating, which can help lower the interest rates for debt-funded capital projects and, in turn, reduce annual debt service payments. This analysis assumes that the City will not be incurring new debt in order to fund the planned capital expenses. It is projected that, with or without the recommended rate increases, the City will meet the debt coverage ratio for all existing and anticipated debt through FY 2022/23 when final payment is due.  Building and Maintaining Reserve Funds: If no rate increases are implemented, reserves (excluding the Pump House 1 reserve) are expected to be depleted by FY 2021/22. This is due to the City’s planned capital improvements which are estimated at $45.3 million over the next four years. By implementing 4% annual rate increases, the water utility will be able to keep reserves above the target balance and provide some leeway if consumption levels fail to rise to the expected 10 million CCF target. The City staff has chosen to set the following reserve targets:
 Operating Reserve equal to 33.3% of the Utility’s budgeted annual operating expenses.

This reserve target is equal to a 4-month (or 120-day) cash cushion for normal operations.

For FY 2019/20, the operating reserve is estimated to be $5.3 million. This reserve is intended to promote financial viability in the event of any short-term fluctuation in revenues and/or expenditures, including fluctuations due to weather patterns, natural

9 The City calculated the estimated water usage by multiplying the number of housing equivalents by 266 CCF. Source file: Water Proforma Working Version 7 2 2019.xlsx.

Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 10
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding billing cycle cash flows, variability in volume-based rates, and changes in the age of receivables.
 Capital Reserve equal to 5% minimum of total expenses, which in FY 2019/20 is approximately $1.6 million. If ratepayers can generate revenues at this level and pace, the City will have reserved a partial cash resource that can be applied toward future capital replacement and rehabilitation needs.
 Pump House 1 Reserve will continue to receive 6% of all fixed and commodity rate revenue which will be used to fund capital improvements related to Pump House 1. This 6% is the City’s established approach to funding the Pump House 1 Reserve.  Debt Reserve is not a requirement of the 2013 Revenue Bonds and, therefore, the City need not hold any reserves for outstanding debt.

Figure 3 summarizes the sources and uses of funds and net revenue requirements for the next four years, and includes the recommended annual rate increases for the water utility.

Figure 3. Summary of Water Revenue Requirements
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Sources of Water Funds
Rate Revenue Under Prevailing Rates $ 22,557,780 $ 22,631,854 $ 22,708,121 $ 22,786,581 $ 22,866,991 Other Operating Revenue 508,490 520,798 535,291 550,282 565,793 Interest Earnings 118,530 542,063 510,160 440,566 415,435 Total Sources of Funds $ 23,184,800 $ 23,694,715 $ 23,753,572 $ 23,777,430 $ 23,848,219 Uses of Water Funds
Operating Expenses $ 15,095,122 $ 15,909,610 $ 16,346,700 $ 16,764,519 $ 17,203,674 Debt Service 342,061 354,924 354,924 354,439 355,895
Rate-Funded Capital Expenses - - 190,974 3,717,372 2,546,505 Total Use of Funds $ 15,437,183 $ 16,264,534 $ 16,892,598 $ 20,836,331 $ 20,106,074 Surplus (Deficiency) before Rate Increase $ 7,747,617 $ 7,430,181 $ 6,860,974 $ 2,941,099 $ 3,742,144 Additional Revenue from Rate Increases - 452,637 1,852,983 2,845,224 3,884,154 Surplus (Deficiency) after Rate Increase $ 7,747,617 $ 7,882,818 $ 8,713,957 $ 5,786,323 $ 7,626,299 Projected Annual Rate Increase 0.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Cumulative Rate Increases 0.00% 4.00% 8.16% 12.49% 16.99% Net Revenue Requirement 1 $ 14,810,163 $ 15,201,673 $ 15,847,147 $ 19,845,482 $ 19,124,847 Total Rate Revenue (Current & Add'l.) $ 22,557,780 $ 23,084,491 $ 24,561,104 $ 25,631,805 $ 26,751,145 Debt Coverage With Rate Increase 23.6 23.2 26.1 27.8 29.6

1. Total Use of Funds less non-rate revenues and interest earnings. This is the annual amounted needed from water rates Summary of Sources and Uses of Funds and Net
Revenue Requirements
Projected
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 11
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 4 summarizes the projected reserve fund balances and reserve targets. A summary of the water utility’s proposed 10-year financial plan is included in Appendix A – Additional Water Rate Study Tables.

The appendix tables include more detailed summaries of the revenue requirements, reserve funds, revenue sources, proposed rate increases, and the City’s capital improvement program.

Figure 4. Summary of Water Reserve Funds
C. Characteristics of Water Customers by Class
Both water consumption levels and number of accounts by customer class are used in allocating costs as part of the cost-of-service analysis. The City’s most recent consumption data by customer class, including an adjustment to reflect more normal consumption levels, are summarized in Figure 5 while Figure 6 summarizes the peak consumption (peaking factors) by customer class. Figure 7 then compares the total number of accounts by customer class.

Figure 5. Water Consumption by Customer Class
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Operating Reserve
Ending Balance $ 5,031,707 $ 5,303,203 $ 5,448,900 $ 5,588,173 $ 5,734,558 Recommended Minimum Target 5,031,707 5,303,203 5,448,900 5,588,173 5,734,558 Capital Rehabilitation & Replacement Reserve
Ending Balance $ 18,645,837 $ 14,975,393 $ 8,963,018 $ 5,699,459 $ 7,418,764 Recommended Minimum Target 1,334,526 1,589,510 1,469,279 1,255,235 1,340,057 Total Ending Balance $ 23,677,544 $ 20,278,597 $ 14,411,918 $ 11,287,632 $ 13,153,322 Total Recommended Minimum Target $ 6,366,233 $ 6,892,713 $ 6,918,179 $ 6,843,409 $ 7,074,615 Rolling Stock Reserve (9193-70)
Ending Balance $ 491,308 $ 569,091 $ 623,106 $ 522,977 $ 648,762 Pump House 1 Reserve
Ending Balance $ 10,539,496 $ 11,924,565 $ 13,398,231 $ 14,936,140 $ 16,541,208 Impact Fee - Restricted Reserve
Beginning Balance $ 1,867,057 $ 2,185,368 $ 2,440,579 $ 1,637,199 $ 1,409,408 Uses of Funds and Add'l. Revenues 318,311 255,210 (803,380) (227,791) 27,793 Ending Balance (Impact Fees Only) 2,185,368 2,440,579 1,637,199 1,409,408 1,437,201 Ending Reserve Fund Balances and
Recommended Reserve Targets
Projected
Meter Size
Water
Consumption
FY 2018/19
(ccf) 1
Adjustment to
Annual
Consumption 2
Adjusted
Annual
Consumption 3
Variable Cost
Allocations (% of
Total Volume)
Single Family 5,743,516 4.58% 6,006,798 60.1%
Multi-Family 1,027,601 4.58% 1,074,707 10.7%
Commercial 1,475,794 4.58% 1,543,444 15.4%
Industrial 435,506 4.58% 455,470 4.6%
Institutional 881,732 4.58% 922,151 9.2%
Total 9,564,149 10,002,569 100.0%
Projected Consumption 4 10,002,569
Hydrant 43,666 0% 43,666 N/A
Grand Total 9,607,815 10,046,235

1. Consumption rates and customer class from Source file: REDDING_Summary Revenue - UPDATED 06-19-2019.xlsx.

2. Adjustment factor to match City's projected annual consumption for FY 2019/20.

3. Adjusted to match City's projection.

4. City's projected consumption. Source file: Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx.

Development of the BASE COMMODITY Allocation Factor
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 12
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 6. Peaking Factors by Customer Class
Figure 7. Number of Accounts by Customer Class
D. Cost-of-Service Analysis
As previously noted in Figure 2, the purpose of the cost-of-service analysis is to fairly and equitably allocate annual revenue requirements to customer classes, while the rate design determines the actual rates within each customer class. The first step in developing the recommended fixed and volumetric rates is to allocate costs between fixed charges, which include capacity-related and customer-related costs, and variable charges (or commodity-related costs). These results are summarized in Figure 8 below and presented in more detail along with several other alternatives in Appendix A.

Meter Size
Average
Monthly Use
(ccf)
Peak Monthly Use
(ccf) 1
Peak Month
Factor 1
Max Month
Capacity Factor
Single Family 478,626 910,580 1.90 63.4%
Multi-Family 85,633 120,400 1.41 8.4%
Commercial 122,983 193,937 1.58 13.5%
Industrial 36,292 73,961 2.04 5.2%
Institutional 73,478 136,731 1.86 9.5%
Total 797,012 1,435,610 1.80 100.0%
Hydrant
Grand Total 797,012 1,435,610

1. Based on June 2017-May 2018 average peak monthly data (peak day data not available).

Development of the PEAK CAPACITY (MAX MONTH) Allocation Factors Meter Size
Number of
Meters 1
Percent of Total
Single Family 23,346 81.5%
Multi-Family 2,161 7.5%
Commercial 2,105 7.3%
Industrial 374 1.3%
Institutional 656 2.3%
Total 28,642 100.0%
Hydrant 47
Grand Total 28,689

1. Number of meters by customer class from Source file:

REDDING_Summary Revenue - UPDATED 06-19-2019.xlsx .

Development of the CUSTOMER Allocation Factor
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 13
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 8. Summary of Rate Revenue Requirements
Developing revenue requirements by customer class is based on the allocation factors previously shown in Figures 5 through 7, and the fixed and variable revenue requirements shown in Figure 8. The following is a summary of the cost-allocation process, whereby each customer class is allocated a percentage of the fixed and variable costs:
 Allocation percentages for water consumption (from Figure 5) are used to allocate commodityrelated variable costs (shown in Figure 9); single-family commodity-related costs are 60.1% of $14.122 million = $8,480,788.
10  Allocation percentages for peaking factors (from Figure 6) are used to allocate capacity-related costs (shown in Figure 9); single-family capacity-related costs are 63.4% of $6.926 million = $4,393,343.
 Allocation percentages for the number of meters (from Figure 7) are used to allocate customerrelated costs (shown in Figure 9); single-family customer-related costs are 81.5% of $2.488 million = $2,028,251.

Figure 9. Summary of Adjusted Rate Revenue Requirements by Customer Class As previously shown in Figure 3, the projected additional rate revenue from rate increases expected to be collected in FY 2019/20 would be $452,637 which assumes rates are effective January 2020. When added to the expected rate revenue from current rates (i.e., $22,631,854), the projected rate revenue for FY 2019/20 is $23,084,491, whereas Figure 9 reflects the adjusted rate revenue used to calculate rates assuming a full year of rate revenue.
11 10 Results shown may not exactly duplicate the actual calculation because there are more decimal places used in the calculations. 11 That is, the revenue for a full year is used to set rates vs. the actual revenue collected for only part of the year.

Single Family $ 14,064,462 63.4% $ 14,902,383 63.3%
Multi-Family 2,341,317 10.6% 2,285,987 9.7%
Commercial 3,212,314 14.5% 3,297,715 14.0%
Industrial 806,417 3.6% 1,032,401 4.4%
Institutional 1,759,819 7.9% 2,018,643 8.6%
Total $ 22,184,328 100.0% $ 23,537,128 100%
Customer Class
Current Rate Design
(40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
Rate Revenue % of Revenue COS
Rev. Req't
% of COS
Rev. Req't.

Rate Revenue
June 2018 - May 2019
Current Rate Design (40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
Commodity Capacity Customer
Single Family $ 8,480,788 $ 4,393,343 $ 2,028,251 $ 14,902,383 63.3% Multi-Family 1,517,340 580,904 187,743 2,285,987 9.7%
Commercial 2,179,134 935,703 182,878 3,297,715 14.0%
Industrial 643,061 356,847 32,492 1,032,401 4.4%
Institutional 1,301,952 659,698 56,992 2,018,643 8.6%
Total $ 14,122,277 $ 6,926,495 $ 2,488,357 $ 23,537,128 100.0% Total Vol. and Fixed Rate Rev. $ 14,122,277 $ 23,537,128

1. This total is higher than shown in the financial plan, which reflects revenue expected for a partial year, whereas the revenue used to set rates needs to assume an entire year of rate revenue.

Customer Class
COS Net
Rev. Req'ts 1
% of COS Net
Revenue Req'ts
Cost Classification Components
$9,414,851
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 14
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding E. Current vs. Proposed Water Rate Structures
Water rate design considers broader rate-design objectives and policies, including revenue stability, equity among customer classes, and water conservation. During this analysis, City staff and NBS developed several rate design alternatives with varying combinations of fixed and variable cost allocations:

1. 40% Fixed and 60% Volumetric

2. 45% Fixed and 55% Volumetric

3. 64% Fixed and 36% Volumetric

4. 71% Fixed and 29% Volumetric
After considering these options, City staff is recommending the City continue with the current rate design of 40% fixed and 60% volumetric (#1 above) and also retain the uniform volumetric rate. As previously noted, it is the opinion of City staff, the City’s legal counsel, and NBS that a uniform volumetric rate is the most defensible rate structure, because of the following: (1) it best represents the City’s single-source of water supply, and (2) it applies equally to all customer classes. The results of this analysis, including the other rate structure alternatives, can be found in Appendix A.

Figure 10 compares the current and proposed rates for FY 2019/20 through FY 2022/23. The cost-ofservice adjustments are reflected in the FY 2019/20 rates; thereafter, rates reflect an across-the-board increase of 4% annually.

Figure 10. Current and Proposed Water Rates for Fiscal Years 2019/20 – 2022/23 Appendix A provides more detailed tables showing the development of the proposed water rates.

Alternative #1 - Current Rate Design
(40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
Fixed Service Charge
Monthly Fixed Service Charge - Standard Meters:
5/8 inch $21.17 $22.15 $23.04 $23.96 $24.92
3/4 inch $28.04 $29.61 $30.79 $32.02 $33.30
1 inch $41.77 $44.52 $46.30 $48.15 $50.08

1.5 inch $76.09 $81.79 $85.06 $88.47 $92.01
2 inch $117.27 $126.52 $131.59 $136.85 $142.32
3 inch $227.10 $245.81 $255.64 $265.87 $276.50
4 inch $350.66 $380.00 $395.20 $411.01 $427.45
6 inch $693.88 $752.77 $782.88 $814.19 $846.76
8 inch $1,105.75 $1,200.08 $1,248.08 $1,298.01 $1,349.93 Commodity Charges for All Water Consumed
Uniform Rate $1.43 $1.41 $1.47 $1.53 $1.59
Current Recommended Rates
Rates
Projected Increase in Rate Revenue per Financial Plan:

Water Rate Schedule
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 15
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding F. Comparison of Current and Proposed Monthly Bills
Single-Family Water Customers
Figure 11 compares monthly water bills under the current and proposed rates for single-family residential customers in the first year of the new rate period.

Figure 11. Monthly Water Bill Comparison for SFR Customers Figure 12 and Figure 13 compare the current and proposed monthly water bills for the typical singlefamily to those of other surrounding communities.

In reviewing the bill comparisons under current vs. new rates, it should be noted that the average residential customer’s water use is higher than in previous years. Because of this, comparing monthly bills under new rates should reflect a slightly higher average water consumption, while bills under current rates should use a slightly lower average consumption.

Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 16
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 12. Regional Monthly Water Bill Comparisons
Figure 13. Nor-Cal Monthly Water Bill Comparisons
$41.20 $42.10
$46.84
$51.10 $51.72 $51.80 $52.51 $54.56
$59.92
$63.94
$78.39
$118.28
$131.49
$0
$25
$50
$75
$100
$125
$150 Monthly Bill
10-City Regional Water Bill Comparisons (Monthly)
Single Family Residential (3/4" Meter & 21 ccf/month)*
Water: Variable Charges
Water: Fixed Charges
* The 21 ccf/month based on Average Annual Water
Consumption.
** Water and/orWastewater services provided by
multiple agencies.
$25.41
$31.63
$51.10
$63.74
$51.76
$70.43
$86.17 $84.66
$150.29
$0
$25
$50
$75
$100
$125
$150
$175
Anderson Red Bluff Redding
(Current)
Yreka Redding
(Proposed
4%)
Nor-Cal
Average
Shasta Lake Eureka Arcata Monthly Bill
Nor-Cal Regional Water Bill Comparisons (Monthly)
Single Family Residential (5/8" Meter & 21 ccf/month)
Water: Variable Charges
Water: Fixed Charges
21 ccf/month is based on Average Annual Water Consumption Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 17
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Commercial Water Customers
Commercial customers are currently subject to the same fixed monthly charges and uniform volumetric rate as single-family customers. Since the level of consumption for commercial customers varies significantly within the commercial class and from residential customers, a uniform volumetric rate most fairly reflects their actual cost-of-service (i.e., vs. a multi-tiered volumetric rate). Figure 14 compares current and proposed monthly bills for commercial customers with a 2-inch meter at various levels of consumption.

Figure 14. Monthly Water Bill Comparison for Commercial Users Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 18
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 4. Wastewater Rate Study
A. Developing Recommended Wastewater Rates
The wastewater rate study focused on key objectives similar to those considered in the water rate study.

One of the main concerns of the wastewater rate analysis was maintaining the financial health of the Utility in light of project increases in capital improvement and replacement costs.

In addition, the study also performed similar tasks asthe water rate study when determining the proposed sewer rates, including the following: (1) developing cost allocations for each customer class; (2) developing revenue requirements by customer class; and, (3) determining rates within the customer classes. Detailed tables showing the step-by-step development of the analysis are presented in Appendix B - Additional Wastewater Rate Study Tables.

B. Wastewater Utility Revenue Requirements
To identify the wastewater utility’s long-term financial needs, including funding for its planned capital improvements, NBS developed a 10-year financial plan that forecasts wastewaterrevenues, expenditures, and reserves. This plan is based on the Utility’s current operating budget, discussions with City staff and the URAG, and other related information provided by the City, such as debt service schedules and capital improvement plans. The financial plan addresses four primary objectives:
 Meeting Operating Costs: The wastewater utility must generate enough revenue to cover the expenses of its operations, including administration, maintenance, collection system, and wastewater treatment plant costs.
 Maintaining Adequate Bond Coverage: The wastewater utility just recently paid off its 2002 Series A Revenue Bonds, but it still has multiple outstanding State Revolving Fund (SRF) loans.

These loans have no specific coverage requirements yet maintaining adequate bond coverage capacity demonstrates the Utility’s ability to issue new debt, if and when it becomes necessary.  Meeting Capital Improvement Costs: The wastewater utility plans to adequately fund necessary capital improvements, which includes roughly $50.2 million in planned capital improvements over the next four years through the use of both capital reserve funds and rate revenue.  Maintaining Reserve Funds: The wastewater utility is not required to maintain a debt reserve fund for the outstanding SRF loans; nevertheless, it has decided to do so in the amount of $4.1 million in order to cover debt payments should revenues not be adequate. Currently, the Utility is financially healthy; however, the reserve balances will significantly decline within a few years without the proposed rate increases and therefore require larger increases in the future.

After discussions with City staff and the URAG, the following target reserve levels are recommended:
 Operating Reserve equal to 25% of the Utility’s annual operating expenses. This reserve target is equal to a 3-month (or 90-day) cash cushion for normal operations. An operating reserve is intended to promote financial viability in the event of any short-term fluctuation in revenues and/or expenditures.
 Capital Reserve equal to 8% of the Utility’s annual operating expenses plus $1.0 million capital.

Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 19
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding  Debt Reserve equal to the existing SRF loan payments which have been factored into this analysis.

Even though the Utility is not legally obligated to maintain a specific reserve balance for the outstanding loans, the City considers it prudent practice to do so in order to ensure the Utility’s ability to make its annual debt service payments.

For FY 2019/20, the net revenue requirement is approximately $27.7 million. The Utility is currently in good financial health and annual revenues are sufficient to cover current operating expenditures, meet debt service payments, and contribute towards planned capital improvement costs. However, considering the planned capital improvements, modest rate increases are recommended. Otherwise, the Utility will find itself facing a deficit of almost $1.5 million within two-years (by FY 2021/22).

Figure 15 summarizes the four-year financial plan that shows the sources and uses of funds along with the net revenue requirements and the proposed annual rate increases of 4 percent. Figure 16 summarizes the Utility’s projected reserve funds and target reserve balances.

Figure 15. Summary of Wastewater Revenue Requirements
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Sources of Sewer Funds
Rate Revenue Under Prevailing Rates $ 28,961,550 $ 29,056,653 $ 29,154,571 $ 29,255,304 $ 29,358,541 Non-Rate Revenues (11,040) (9,192) (9,152) (9,071) (8,988) Interest Earnings - 280,300 195,210 254,862 249,204
Total Sources of Funds $ 28,950,510 $ 29,327,761 $ 29,340,628 $ 29,501,095 $ 29,598,757 Uses of Sewer Funds
Operating Expenses $ 15,143,480 $ 15,245,120 $ 15,960,750 $ 16,387,235 $ 16,825,237 Debt Service 7,666,240 4,463,740 4,463,740 4,463,740 5,788,071 Rate-Funded Capital Expenses - 8,288,921 5,583,628 7,124,394 5,630,265 Transfer to Rolling Stock (350,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) Total Use of Funds $ 22,459,720 $ 27,697,781 $ 25,708,118 $ 27,675,368 $ 27,943,573 Surplus (Deficiency) before Rate Increase $ 6,490,790 $ 1,629,981 $ 3,632,510 $ 1,825,727 $ 1,655,184 Additional Revenue from Rate Increases $ - $ 1,162,266 $ 2,379,013 $ 3,652,934 $ 4,986,799 Surplus (Deficiency) after Rate Increase $ 6,490,790 $ 2,792,247 $ 6,011,523 $ 5,478,662 $ 6,641,984 Projected Annual Rate Increase 0.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Cumulative Rate Increases 0.00% 4.00% 8.16% 12.49% 16.99% Net Revenue Requirement 1
$ 22,820,760 $ 27,726,672 $ 25,822,061 $ 27,729,577 $ 28,003,356

1. Total Use of Funds less non-rate revenues and interest earnings. This is the annual amount needed from sewer rates.

Summary of Sources and Uses of Funds
and Net Revenue Requirements
Projected
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 20
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 16. Summary of Wastewater Reserve Funds
A summary of the financial plan through FY 2029/30 showing the revenue requirements, revenue sources (including rate revenue), and necessary rate increases is presented in Appendix B, along with a summary of the Utility’s capital improvement program.

C. Cost-of-Service Analysis
Due to the limitations of the wastewater utility billing system, the detailed customer data linking water use to individual wastewater customer accounts is not available. The issue with the wastewater billing system data is the reason why a full cost-of-service analysis has never been performed. As a result, NBS reviewed and evaluated the Utility’s revenue requirements and current rate design from a broader perspective. In NBS’ opinion, absent of the detailed customer data, the City’s current rate design is reasonably fair and equitable, and we and the City staff are not aware of any apparent inequities that would necessitate a more detailed analysis.

In light of these factors, City staff has determined that across-the-board adjustments to current rates are acceptable, with the provision that the City will work on acquiring the necessary billing data so that a more detailed cost-of-service analysis can be performed in the future.

D. Current vs. Proposed Wastewater Rates
Currently, the City’s wastewater rates consist of a fixed monthly charge per residence for single-family dwellings and a fixed monthly charge per unit for multi-family dwellings. Standard commercial and commercial food preparation customers are billed in two different ways; standard commercial customers are charged either a volumetric ($/CCF) rate based on water consumption or a fixed charge per month based on the number of equivalent housing units per location/account. The commercial food preparation rate is twice the residential and commercial rates to account for the higher conveyance and treatment costs associated with higher biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and oil and grease from food preparation effluent.

As mentioned earlier, the City decided to continue using the current rate structure. The proposed rates reflect the necessary increases in rate revenue each year.

Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Operating Reserve
Beginning Balance $ 17,163,681 $ 3,821,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,107,000 $ 4,217,000 Recommended Minimum Target 3,786,000 3,821,000 4,000,000 4,107,000 4,217,000 Capital Rehab & Replacement Reserve (Rates)
Beginning Balance $ - $ 9,814,587 $ 4,264,352 $ 7,922,803 $ 7,455,680 Recommended Minimum Target 2,240,000 2,210,000 2,240,000 2,300,000 2,330,000 Debt Reserve
Beginning Balance $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 Recommended Minimum Target 4,058,000 4,058,000 4,058,000 4,058,000 4,058,000 Total Beginning Balance $ 21,221,681 $ 17,693,587 $ 12,322,352 $ 16,087,803 $ 15,730,680 Total Recommended Minimum Target $ 10,084,000 $ 10,089,000 $ 10,298,000 $ 10,465,000 $ 10,605,000 Beginning Reserve Fund Balances and
Recommended Reserve Targets
Projected
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 21
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 17 shows the current and proposed wastewater rates through FY 2022/23. Figure 18 and Figure 19 compare the FY 2019/20 monthly wastewater bill of the typical single-family residence to that of surrounding communities.

Figure 17. Current and Proposed Wastewater Rates for Fiscal Year 2019/20 – 2022/23 Figure 18. Regional Monthly Single-Family Wastewater Bill Comparisons FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Annual Rate increases as shown in Financial Plan: 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Monthly Service Charges:

Single Family Dwelling ($/residence) $54.86 $57.05 $59.33 $61.70 $64.17 Multi Family Dwelling ($/unit) $40.59 $42.21 $43.90 $45.66 $47.49 Standard Commercial billed monthly ($/ccf) $5.64 $5.87 $6.10 $6.34 $6.59 Standard Commercial calculated annually ($/# HE) 2 $54.86 $57.05 $59.33 $61.70 $64.17 Commercial Food Preparation billed monthly ($/ccf) $11.28 $11.73 $12.20 $12.69 $13.20 Commercial Food Preparation calculated annually ($/# HE) $109.72 $114.11 $118.67 $123.42 $128.36

1. Current rates are from source file: REDDING_Wastewater Fee Schedule.pdf .

2. Includes Industrial, Other and Unknown customers.

Proposed Rates

SEWER RATE SCHEDULE
Current
Rates 1
$22.98
$34.00
$40.40 $40.55 $42.95
$46.38 $47.24 $48.52
$53.15 $54.86 $57.05
$62.15 $63.33
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100 Monthly Bill
10-City Regional Wastewater Bill Comparisons (Monthly)
Single Family Residential (FY 2019/20)
Wastewater: Variable Charges
Wastewater: Fixed Charges
* Water and/or Wastewater services provided by
multiple agencies.

For Cities with a volumetric component, 8 ccf/month
was used based on Average Winter Water
Consumption.

Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 22
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 19. Nor-Cal Monthly Single-Family Wastewater Bill Comparisons $34.00 $34.60
$43.68
$48.39
$54.86
$57.05
$74.47
$78.22
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
Red Bluff Anderson Yreka Nor-Cal
Average
Redding
(Current)
Redding
(Proposed
4%)
Shasta Lake Eureka Arcata Monthly Bill
Nor-Cal Regional Wastewater Bill Comparisons (Monthly)
Single Family Residential
Total Wastewater
Wastewater: Variable Charges
For Cities with a volumetric component, 8 ccf/month
was used based on Average Winter Water
Consumption.
$67.02
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 23
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 5. Solid Waste Rate Study
A. Key Solid Waste Rate Study Issues
In evaluating solid waste rates, two of the City’s key concerns were: (1) ensuring that rates adequately considered new costs related to new programs and equipment needs, and (2) verifying that rates are costbased according to Prop 218 requirements. As a result of this rate study, there are cost-of-service based adjustments to individual residential and commercial rates that better reflect the level of service based on size and number of pickups per week.

The following sections summarize these results. More detailed tables showing the step-by-step development of the analysis are documented in Appendix C – Additional Solid Waste Rate Study Tables.

Rate Study Methodology and Assumptions
The basic steps in a solid waste rate analysis are similar to that of the water and wastewater utilities but, whereas water rates use a fixed charge plus a volume-related charge based on water consumption, solid waste rates are determined by the fixed and variable costs based on the level of service provided to the customer. The level of service refers to the number and size of containers, the number of pickups per week, and the tonnage of waste collected.

Similar to the water and wastewater rate studies, the solid waste rate analysis addressed revenue requirements and the cost-of-service and rate design analyses previously noted in Figure 2. In particular, the cost-of-service analysis evaluated whether or not the current rates properly recover revenue from each customer class, resulting in adjustments to individual rates attributable to their levels of service.

B. Solid Waste Utility Revenue Requirements
The solid waste utility’s long-term financial needs are summarized in the 10-year financial plan in Appendix C. It forecasts the amount of revenue needed to cover operating expenses, rolling stock replacements, planned capital improvements, reserves, and other obligations. This plan is based on the Utility’s current operating budget and other planning projections, such as capital improvement projects and rolling stock needs. The three basic objectives of the financial plan are:
 Meeting Operating Costs: The solid waste utility must generate enough revenue to cover the expenses of its operations, including transfer station and street sweeping services. For FY 2019/20, the net revenue requirement (i.e., total annual expenses, less non-rate revenues) is approximately $17.7 million.
 Meeting Capital Costs: The solid waste utility will need to fund approximately $1.7 million in capital improvements over the next four years (see Appendix C, Table 14).  Maintaining Reserve Funds: The solid waste utility had a strong reserve fund balance of almost $6.8 million at the start of FY 2019/20. Without the recommended rate increases, this balance will dramatically decline over the next four years and the Utility would be faced with a deficit by the end of FY 2022/23.

Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 24
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding As with the water and wastewater utilities, City staff worked with NBS to set the reserve targets according to industry standards. The City recommended the following reserve levels that correspond to the Utility’s 10-year financial plan:
 Operating Reserve equal to 10% of the Utility’s budgeted annual operating expenses less utility expenses, such as tipping fees and administration costs. This reserve target is equal to a threemonth (or 90-day) cash cushion for normal operations.  Capital Reserve equal to 7% of net assets, which assumes an average asset life expectancy of 14 years.
 Rolling Stock Reserve equal to the average annual rolling stock replacement costs of approximately $1.5 million for the next four years.

Figure 20 summarizes the Utility’s financial plan, including the sources and uses of funds along with the estimated annual surplus assuming that rate increases are implemented. Figure 21 shows a summary of the projected reserves for the solid waste utility.

Figure 20. Summary of the Revenue Requirements for the Solid Waste Utility Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Sources of Solid Waste Funds
Rate Revenue Under Prevailing Rates $16,905,190 $16,960,702 $17,017,858 $17,076,658 $17,136,918 Fee Revenue 2,059,130 2,127,868 2,199,090 2,272,889 2,349,337 Other Revenue 1,547,160 1,552,180 1,557,348 1,562,664 1,568,113 Interest Earnings 161,740 122,017 90,354 83,582 84,765
Total Sources of Funds $20,673,220 $20,762,768 $20,864,650 $20,995,793 $21,139,134 Uses of Solid Waste Funds
Operating Expenses $20,136,650 $20,512,810 $20,610,470 $21,209,110 $21,821,640 Debt Service - - - - -
Rate-Funded Capital Expenses 51,000 1,035,000 243,450 - - Total Uses of Funds $20,187,650 $21,547,810 $20,853,920 $21,209,110 $21,821,640 Surplus (Deficiency) before Rate Increase $ 485,570 $ (785,042) $ 10,730 $ (213,317) $ (682,506) Additional Revenue from Rate Increases $ - $ 286,329 $ 1,168,333 $ 1,788,027 $ 2,432,755 Surplus (Deficiency) after Rate Increase $ 485,570 $ (498,714) $ 1,179,063 $ 1,574,710 $ 1,750,248 Projected Annual Rate Increase 0.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Cumulative Rate Increases 0.00% 3.00% 6.09% 9.27% 12.55% Net Revenue Requirement 1$16,419,620 $17,745,745 $17,007,128 $17,289,975 $17,819,424 Total Rate Revenue After Rate Increases $16,905,190 $17,247,031 $18,186,191 $18,864,685 $19,569,673

1. Total Use of Funds less non-rate revenues and interest earnings. This is the annual amount needed from solid waste rates.

Summary of Sources and Uses of Funds and
Net Revenue Requirements
Projected
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 25
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 21. Summary of the Reserve Funds for the Solid Waste Utility

A summary of the Utility’s entire financial plan, including revenue requirements, revenue sources (including rate revenue), and necessary rate increases, is presented in Appendix C. Summaries of the solid waste utility’s capital improvement program and rolling stock replacement plan are also included in Appendix C.

C. Customer Class Characteristics and Cost-of-Service
Similar to the cost-of-service analysis for the water utility, the solid waste cost-of-service analysis relies on specific allocation factors for each customer class and determines how costs are divided into various types of service (e.g., collection, disposal, and transfer station). A detailed allocation of costs was prepared based on input from City staff and a thorough review of collection, disposal, and transfer station operations. Figure 22 through Figure 26 below summarize the basic allocation factors used in the costof-service analysis. These figures also provide a comparison to the 2013-2015 annual averages used in the previous rate study and indicate that commercial customers have significantly increased their level of service compared to residential customers; this impacts the rate adjustments.

Figure 22. Summary of Solid Waste Tonnage Allocation Factors Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Operating Reserve
Ending Balance $ 6,833,634 $ 4,534,921 $ 3,813,984 $ 3,388,694 $ 3,138,942 Recommended Minimum Target 3,320,000 3,447,000 3,474,000 3,575,000 3,677,000 Capital Rehab & Replacement Reserve
Ending Balance $ 868,550 $ 1,168,550 $ 1,462,000 $ 1,962,000 $ 2,011,000 Recommended Minimum Target 1,252,000 1,232,000 1,162,000 1,081,000 1,034,000 Rolling Stock Reserve
Ending Balance $ 1,002,081 $ 1,427,935 $ 1,466,737 $ 1,382,273 $ 1,061,690 Recommended Minimum Target 1 1,002,081 1,427,935 1,466,737 1,382,273 1,061,690 Total Ending Balance $ 8,704,265 $ 7,131,406 $ 6,742,721 $ 6,732,967 $ 6,211,633 Total Recommended Minimum Target $ 5,574,081 $ 6,106,935 $ 6,102,737 $ 6,038,273 $ 5,772,690

1. The Rolling Stock Reserve receives annual transfers-in to meet expenditures, so the ending balance is the target reserve.

Ending Reserve Fund Balances and
Recommended Reserve Targets
Projected
Avg. 2016-18
Tonnage
Tonnage
Allocation
Factors
(% of Total)
Avg. 2013-15
Tonnage
Tonnage
Allocation
Factors
(% of Total)
Residential 32,508 44% 28,459 48%
Commercial 30,522 41% 21,284 36%
Roll Off 9,414 13% 8,659 15%
Street Sweeper 1,138 2% 1,117 2%
Total 73,581 100% 59,519 100%

75.0% Percent of TS greenwaste allocated to Residential Carts Customer Class
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 26
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 23. Comparison of Solid Waste Tonnages
Figure 24. Summary of Solid Waste Account/Pickups-Per-Week Allocation Factors Figure 25. Comparison of Solid Waste Account/Pickups-Per-Week Since some of the solid waste operating costs are not easily allocated to the various types of services, the average tonnage and the number of accounts/pickups were used to develop a combined allocation factor.

These factors are shown in Figure 26.
28,459
21,284
8,659
32,508 30,522
9,414
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Residential Commercial Roll Off
Average Tons/Year
Comparison of 2013-15 vs. 2016-18 Average Annual
Solid Waste Tonnages
Avg. 2013-15 Tonnage Avg. 2016-18 Tonnage
14%
Increase 43%
Increase
9%
Increase
Type of Account/Service # of Accounts
(or Unsch. Lifts)
% of Total
Accounts/
Pickups
# of Accounts
(or Unsch. Lifts)
% of Total
Accounts/
Pickups
Residential (Includes Comm. Carts) 28,625 83% 30,415 88% Commercial (Compactor & Container Accts) 4,541 13% 2,981 9% Drop Boxes (No. of Unscheduled Pickups) 1,368 4% 1,311 4% Total 34,534 100% 34,707 100%
Data is from source file: June 2018 Waste Wheeler Revenue.pdf and June 2018 Fixed Charge Report with notes.pdf . 30,415
2,981
1,311
28,625
4,541
1,368
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Residential Accts. Commercial Pickups Roll Off (Pickups) Average Tons/Year
Comparison of 2013-15 vs. 2016-18 Average Annual
Solid Waste Accounts or Pickups
Avg. 2013-15 Accts./Pickups Avg. 2016-18 Accts./Pickups 6%
Decrease
52%
Increase
4%
Increase Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 27
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 26. Summary of Solid Waste Combined Allocation Factors In general, costs from street sweeping and recycling operations are not directly assigned to individual customers through monthly rates, but instead are included in other rates based on the level of service provided to each customer class.

Figure 27 summarizes the methodology and various allocations used for each customer class.

Figure 27. Summary of Solid Waste Allocation Methodology The total revenue requirements for each customer class were calculated using the allocation factors and target revenue requirements. Figure 28 summarizes these calculations and indicates that, overall, 52% of the rate revenue should be collected from residential customers, 38% from commercial customers, and 10% from roll-off customers. As noted previously, as a result of the cost-of-service analysis, adjustments were made to both the amount of revenue required and the individual rates based on the level of service.

Figure 29 provides a comparison of the revenue currently collected by customer class and the costs allocated to each customer class under the proposed rates. As this figure shows, residential customers now pay a slightly smaller percentage of the total revenue requirements, commercial customers pay a larger percentage under the proposed rates, and drop boxes pay less than their current revenue requirement.

Customer Class
Tonnage
Allocation
Factor
Accounts / Pickups
Allocation Factor
Combined
Allocation
Factor 1
Residential 44.2% 82.9% 57.0%
Commercial 41.5% 13.1% 32.0%
Roll Off 12.8% 4.0% 10.0%
Street Sweeper 1.5% 0.0% 1.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

1. This is the weighted average of the Tonnage (2/3) and Accounts/pickups (1/3) factors.

Summary of Solid Waste Cost Allocations
Acct. Budget Category Residential Commercial Roll-Off Transfer Station
550 Admin.
551 Residential Collection Customers served
552 Commercial Collection Customers served
553 Roll-Off Collection Customers served
556 Resource Recovery Avg. of Resid/Comm Accts. & Recy. tons 557 Transfer Station Annual T.S. Tonnage
558 Household Hazardous Waste 6,886 Resid. vs. 186 Comm. HHW customers 559 Street Sweeping Miles of Streets Swept (46 Res./54 Comm.) Less Non-Rate Rev. Allocated As All Operating Costs
Avg. % of Tonnage & No. of Accounts
Basis for Allocation
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 28
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 28. Summary of Revenue Requirements by Customer Class Figure 29. Summary of Current vs. Proposed Revenue Requirements by Customer Class D. Rate Design and Proposed Solid Waste Rates
Residential Container Rates – Based on the revenue requirements by customer class (see Figure 28), rate design analysis determines the individual rates within each customer class. Figure 30 below summarizes the calculations and basis for residential container rates. This includes various adjustments, such as the inclusion of revenue from a second green waste cart.

Figure 28 also shows the residential programs costs, including the costs for recycling (resource recovery) and the household hazardous waste program, and how these costs were allocated to each container size.

The recommended residential solid waste rates are provided in Figure 31. A comparison of the typical single-family monthly solid waste bill with that of other communities is provided in Figure 32.

Summary of Solid Waste Cost Allocations to Customer Classes Acct. Budget Category* Residential Commercial Drop Box Total 550 Solid Waste Administration 1 $ 1,633,029 $ 924,796 $ 284,203 $ 2,842,028 551 Residential Collection 3,261,958 - - 3,261,958 Customers served 552 Commercial Collection 2
- 3,262,949 - 3,262,949 Customers served
553 Roll-Off Collection - - 1,083,444 1,083,444 Customers served 552 Commercial Container Costs - 78,490 78,490 156,980 50/50 between commercial & roll-offs 4 556 Resource Recovery 3,370,701 1,530,925 80,575 4,982,200 Avg. of Resid/Comm Accts. & Recy. tons 557 Transfer Station 3 1,103,948 1,422,177 292,665 2,818,790 Annual T.S. Tonnage 558 Hhld Hazardous Waste 497,629 15,391 - 513,019 6,886 Resid. vs. 186 Comm. HHW customers 559 Street Sweeping 491,908 587,890 119,978 1,199,776 Miles of Streets Swept Rate-Funded Capital 524,631 403,322 115,236 1,043,188 Allocated As All Operating Costs Less Non-Rate Rev. (1,841,819) (1,504,037) (348,953) (3,694,809) Various - Changes by type of revenue 9,041,985 6,721,902 1,705,638 17,469,524
52% 38% 10% 100% $ 17,469,524 Target Rev. (Func. & Alloc.) * Note: Total budgets by account number have been adjusted from "Net Revenue Reqt's." to 2019/20 Target Rate Revenue reflecting recommended rate increases.

1. 46% of the Street Sweeping Costs in Admin. are allocated to Residential and 54% to Commercial.

2. Total Commercial budgeted costs less sanitation container costs.

3. 46% of the Street Sweeping Costs in Transfer Station Expenses are allocated to Residential and 54% to Commercial.

4. Although there are fewer roll-offs, City staff felt an equal split was appropriate because of their larger size and cost vs. commercial containers.

Basis for Allocation
Total Adjusted to meet Target Rate Revenue
Avg. % of Tonnage & No. of Accounts
% of Total
Residential Commercial Drop Box Total
Current Rates (FY 2019/20 Budget) $ 9,075,093 $ 6,038,564 $ 1,847,045 $ 16,960,702 Proposed Rates (FY 2019/20) $ 9,041,985 $ 6,721,902 $ 1,705,638 $ 17,469,524 -0.4% 11.3% -7.7% 3.0%
54% 36% 11% 100%
52% 38% 10% 100%
Percent Change
Current Rates - % of Total
Proposed Rates - % of Total
Current vs. Proposed Budget
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 29
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 30. Summary of Proposed Residential Container Rates 45-Gal Cont. 64-Gal Cont. 96-Gal Cont.

Residential Account Data
No. of Carts 2 (Incl. Comm. Carts) -
Standard Service (All Carts) 981 4,269 23,375 28,625
Additional Cart (No longer offered) 0 0 0 0
Total No. of Carts 981 4,269 23,375 28,625
No. of "Equivalent Carts" 3 461 2,860 23,375 26,696
No. of Lifts/yr. 50,990 221,973 1,215,523 1,488,486
Residential Program Costs
Admin. Costs $55,942 $243,528 $1,333,560 $1,633,029
Residential Collection
Cost of Containers 4 ($/yr.) 170 1,054 8,616 9,840 Proportional to current container costs.

Cost of Disposal 259 1,607 13,134 15,000 Proportional to number of "Equivalent Carts".

Cost of Collection 5 110,801 482,341 2,641,301 3,234,443 Cost are same regardless of size container.

Resource Recovery 115,468 502,661 2,752,572 3,370,701 Cost are same regardless of size container.

Transfer Station 19,058 118,268 966,622 1,103,948 Proportional to number of "Equivalent Carts".

HHW Program 17,047 74,210 406,372 497,629 Cost are same regardless of size container.

Street Sweeping 16,851 73,356 401,701 491,908 Cost are same regardless of size container.

Rate-Funded Capital 17,972 78,236 428,422 524,631 Cost are same regardless of size container. less Non-Rate Rev. Credits (59,274) (265,223) (1,517,322) (1,841,819) Add-back (NCC Surcharges) 6 N.A. N.A. N.A. $ 2,675
Total Annual Costs $ 294,293 $ 1,310,038 $ 7,434,978 $ 9,041,985 less 2nd GW Cart Revenue 7 $ (8,952) $ (38,970) $ (213,399) $ (261,321) Net Revenue from Rates $ 285,341 $ 1,271,068 $ 7,221,579 $ 8,780,663 Total Costs ($/mo./container) $24.25 $24.81 $25.74 $25.56 45-Gal Cont. 64-Gal Cont. 96-Gal Cont.

Proportional New Rates8 $23.16 $24.20 $25.90 100% 105% 112% Increase vs. 45-Gal. Rate N.A. $1.05 $2.74
Current Rates $22.36 $23.37 $25.01 100% 105% 112%
% Increase vs. Current Rates 3.6% 3.6% 3.6%

1. Includes both residential and commercial cans (carts).

2. Source file: City's Waste Wheeler Revenue Report for June 2018 dated 07/03/2018 (File: June 2018 Waste Wheeler Revenue.pdf ).

3. Assumes a 45-gal. cart is 47% of a 96-gal cart and a 64-gal. cart is 67% of a 96-gal cart.

4. Budgeted cost for "Waste Wheelers."

5. Total Residential Collection budget less the cost of containers, disposal, and NCC charges.

6. Non-Curbside Collection (NCC) surcharge revenue is assumed to be about the same and is deducted from the Cost of Collection revenue requirements and added back here. This cost is not included when calculating residential rates.

7. Assumes the City begins charging for the second green waste cart at $4.00/mo. and the current number of GW carts is 5,077. Revenue is allocated to residential carts based on total carts in each size.

8. This maintains the current proportional differences between 45-, 64- and 96-gallon carts.

Use of Adjusted Accounts (1) vs. Unadjusted (0)
Current vs. New Rates as % of 45-Gal. Rate
Residential Containers 1 Total
(or average) Allocation Basis
Calculation of Residential Service Charges
Cost are proportional to % of other costs.
45-gal. = 47% of 96-gal., 64-gal = 67% of 96-gal.

One lift/week for all containers.

Allocated by number of accounts
From City's Waste Wheeler Revenue Report
(Adjusted to better match current '18/19 rate revenue)
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 30
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 31. Current and Proposed Solid Waste Rates Fiscal Year 2019/20 – 2022/23 Figure 32. Monthly Single-Family Solid Waste Bill Comparison with Other Communities FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Annual Rate increases as shown in Financial Plan: 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Residential Wheeled Cart Monthly Rate 1
45-Gal Container $22.36 $23.16 $23.85 $24.57 $25.30
64-Gal Container $23.37 $24.20 $24.93 $25.68 $26.45
96-Gal Container $25.01 $25.90 $26.68 $27.48 $28.30
Additional Green Waste Container $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 Landfill Monitoring
Automated Cart Special Collection Rate (per cart)
45-gallon
Same Day (50% of monthly fee) $11.18 $11.58 $11.93 $12.28 $12.65 Not Same Day (65% of monthly fee) $14.53 $15.05 $15.50 $15.97 $16.45 64-gallon
Same Day (50% of monthly fee) $11.69 $12.10 $12.46 $12.84 $13.22 Not Same Day (65% of monthly fee) $15.19 $15.73 $16.20 $16.69 $17.19 96-gallon
Same Day (50% of monthly fee) $12.51 $12.95 $13.34 $13.74 $14.15 Not Same Day (65% of monthly fee) $16.26 $16.84 $17.34 $17.86 $18.40

1. Residential Service includes trash, recycling, and green waste containers.

SOLID WASTE RATE SCHEDULE Current Rates
('18/19)
Proposed Rates
($0.22/month - no increases)
$21.72
$31.20
$25.01
$25.90
$30.75
$36.74
$30.75
$90.96
$20.20
$25.90
$23.37
$24.20
$25.25
$33.16
$25.25
$62.80
$57.46
$22.36
$23.16
$31.41
$46.99
$32.31
$- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100
Anderson
Red Bluff
Redding (Current)
Redding (Proposed
3%)
Yreka
Nor-Cal Average
Shasta Lake
Eureka
Aracata
Monthly Bill
Nor-Cal Regional Solid Waste Mo. Bill Comparisons (FY'19/20) Single Family Residential (including refuse, recycling & yard waste) Solid Waste: 45 gallon or less
Solid Waste: 64 gallon
Solid Waste: 96 gallon
^ Indicates Private Solid Waste
Service Provider Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 31
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Commercial Container Rates – Calculating commercial container rates involves first determining the costof-service for specific service components, such as costs per container lift, costs per cubic yard of waste collected, and costs for the containers themselves. Figure 33 summarizes these unit costs which are then used to allocate the commercial revenue requirements to each level of service (i.e., size of container and number of pickups per week).

Proposed commercial container rates are summarized in Figure 34. A detailed comparison of the current and proposed rates indicates that costs are not equally distributed among individual services. As a result, some types of services increased more than the average while others actually decreased.

Figure 33. Summary of Calculated Unit Costs for Commercial Services Calculation of Commercial Service Charges 1
Commercial Account Data & Program Costs
Admin. Costs $ 924,796 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. $4.85/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size.

Commercial Collection 2
Cost of Containers 3 ($/yr.) 78,490 2,549 No. of Cont. $30.79/Cont./Yr Costs will be adjusted to account for size.

Cost of Disposal 1,253,316 714,644 CY/Year $1.75/CY Proportional to number of "Equivalent Carts." Cost of Collection 4 2,009,248 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. $10.53/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size.

Total Comm. Collection 3,341,053 N.A. N.A. N.A.

Resource Recovery 1,530,925 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. $8.03/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size.

Allocated T.S. Costs 1,422,177 714,644 CY/Year $1.99/CY Proportional to number of "Equivalent Carts." HHW Program 15,391 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. $0.08/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size.

Street Sweeping 587,890 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. $3.08/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size.

Rate-Funded Capital 403,322 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. $2.11/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size. less Non-Rate Rev. Credits (1,504,037) 190,745 Total Lifts/Yr. ($7.89)/Lift Applies to each lift, regardless of container size.

Add-back (NCC Surcharges) 5 $ 386 $386
Total Annual Costs 6 $ 6,721,902 $398
Total Lift Costs in $/Lift $20.80/Lift Cost will be adjusted based on container sizes.

Total Disposal Costs in $/CY $3.74/CY
Total Container Costs in $/Container $30.79/Cont./Yr Cost will be adjusted based on container sizes.

1. Includes only commercial containers that are charged fees; excludes recycling services.

2. Includes additional carts and assumes a 64-gal. cart is 67% of a 96-gal cart.

3. Costs are those budgeted for "Sanitation Containers." Commercial and Roll-offs split this cost per City staff.

4. Total Commercial Collection budget for Carts (vs. Compactors/Containers) less the cost of containers and disposal.

5. Non-Curbside Collection (NCC) surcharge revenue is assumed to be about the same and is deducted from the Cost of Collection revenue requirement and added back here. This cost is not included when calculating commercial rates.

6. This does not reconcile with the summary of costs due to adjustments for container costs which are split between comm. & roll-offs.

Cost Categories
Commercial
Containers 1
No. of
Units
Type of
Unit
Per-Unit
Cost
Allocation Basis
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 32
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Figure 34. Summary of Commercial Service Rates
1 2 3 4 5 6

2.0 3 308 $16.37 $3.74 $18.82 $49.00 $169.85 $338.13 $506.42 $674.70 $842.98 $1,011.26

3.0 2 132 $19.10 $3.74 $28.24 $66.67 $231.13 $459.91 $688.69 $917.47 $1,146.24 $1,375.02

4.0 7 617 $21.83 $3.74 $37.65 $84.35 $292.41 $581.68 $870.96 $1,160.23 $1,449.51 $1,738.78

5.0 0 0 $24.55 $3.74 $47.06 $102.03 $353.69 $703.46 $1,053.23 $1,403.00 $1,752.77 $2,102.54

6.0 14 1,366 $27.28 $3.74 $56.47 $119.70 $414.97 $825.24 $1,235.50 $1,645.76 $2,056.03 $2,466.29

8.0 0 0 $32.74 $3.74 $75.30 $155.06 $537.53 $1,068.79 $1,600.04 $2,131.30 $2,662.55 $3,193.81 Total 25 2,423

1.0 1 44 $13.64 $3.74 $9.41 $21.96 $76.12 $151.46 $226.80 $302.14 $377.48 $452.82

1.5 438 24,939 $15.01 $3.74 $14.12 $26.12 $90.54 $179.90 $269.26 $358.63 $447.99 $537.35

2.0 531 31,152 $16.37 $3.74 $18.82 $30.28 $104.95 $208.34 $311.73 $415.11 $518.50 $621.88

3.0 526 38,422 $19.10 $3.74 $28.24 $38.59 $133.79 $265.22 $396.65 $528.08 $659.52 $790.95

4.0 680 56,047 $21.83 $3.74 $37.65 $46.91 $162.62 $322.10 $481.58 $641.06 $800.54 $960.02

6.0 291 30,667 $27.28 $3.74 $56.47 $63.54 $220.28 $435.85 $651.43 $867.00 $1,082.58 $1,298.15

8.0 57 7,050 $32.74 $3.74 $75.30 $80.18 $277.94 $549.61 $821.28 $1,092.95 $1,364.62 $1,636.29 Total 2,524 188,322
Grand Total - Commercial 2,549 190,745

1. Data was provided in the Solid Waste Fixed Charge Summary Report for June 2018 dated 07/03/2018. Source file: June 2018 Fixed Charge Report.xlsx .

2. This is the adjusted cost per lift and assumes that 50% of cost/lift is related to container volume (it reflects higher cost of handling and fewer pickups per collection vehicle).

3. Includes a 25% surcharge for intermittent service (vs. scheduled).

4. Rates are determined using lift costs (times the number of lifts), disposal costs (times the amount of disposal per container), and container costs (adjusted to account for size of container).

Also, compactor rates were adjusted to reflect the higher disposal tonnages that result from compaction vs. loose-fill waste in non-compactor containers.

Commercial
Containers
Container Type 1 Size
(CY)
Front Load
Compactors
Unsched. Rates 3
Monthly Rates - By Container Size & Pickups Per Week 4
Container Cost
($/yr.) Costs per Lift 2
Costs
Per CY
Collected
Total No.
(excl.

Unsched.)
Total
Lifts/yr.

Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS – February 2020 33
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Roll-Off Container Rates – A similar analysis of roll-off containers was used to calculate the proposed rates.

Figure 35 summarizes the roll-off costs by budget category, including adjustments for other revenues collected outside the monthly service charges or per pickup charges. These were the adjustments deducted from the rate revenues.

Roll-off services are primarily provided on an “as-needed,” or unscheduled, basis and consist of two basic types of containers: (1) Roll-off Compactors, and (2) Roll-off Containers (i.e., non-compactor bins). Figure 36 summarizes the costs allocated to each type of container and each size of container, resulting in a rate per lift (or pickup).

Figure 35. Summary of Roll-Off Service Costs
Figure 36. Summary of Roll-Off Service Rates
Acct. Budget Category Roll-Off Costs 1
Tonnage Rev.

Adjustment 2
Cost After
Adjustment 3
550 Solid Waste Administration $ 284,203 $ (157,918) $ 126,285 Avg. % of Tonnage & No. of Accounts 551 Residential Collection - - - Customers served
552 Commercial Collection - - - Customers served
553 Roll-Off Collection 1,083,444 (602,017) 481,427 Customers served 552 Commercial Container Costs 78,490 (43,613) 34,877 50/50 between commercial & roll-offs 556 Resource Recovery 80,575 (44,772) 35,803 Avg. of Resid/Comm Accts. & Recy. tons 557 Transfer Station 292,665 (162,620) 130,045 Annual T.S. Tonnage 558 Hhld Hazardous Waste - - - 6,886 Resid. vs. 186 Comm. HHW customers 559 Street Sweeping 119,978 (66,666) 53,312 Miles of Streets Swept 559 Rate-Funded Capital 115,236 (64,031) 51,205 Allocated As All Operating Costs Less Non-Rate Rev. (348,953) - (348,953) Various - Changes by type of revenue $ 1,705,638 $ (1,141,635) $ 564,003

1. From Summary of Solid Waste Cost Allocations to Customer Classes, without adjustments for tonnage revenues.

2. The City collects additional revenue from Roll-Off services for tonnages over the weight limits. This revenue, based on the current landfill tipping fee of $82.50/ton, is deducted equally from revenue requirements of other cost categories to calculate fixed charges.

3. Roll-Off Costs less Tonnage Adjustment.

Basis for Allocation
Total
Lifts/Yr. Lifts/Yr. Total Total Lifts/Yr.

10.0 12 360 $1,342 $4,223 $666 $761 ($3,061) $3,931 $327.57

15.0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $387.04

20.0 36 2,160 $4,025 $12,669 $3,997 $4,566 ($9,183) $16,074 $446.50

25.0 60 4,500 $6,708 $21,115 $8,328 $9,512 ($15,305) $30,358 $505.97

30.0 108 9,720 $12,074 $38,007 $17,988 $20,546 ($27,549) $61,067 $565.43

37.0 12 1,332 $1,342 $4,223 $2,465 $2,816 ($3,061) $7,784 $648.69

40.0 228 27,360 $25,490 $80,238 $50,632 $57,834 ($58,159) $156,036 $684.37 Total - Compactors 456 45,432 $50,980 $160,476 $84,077 $96,034 ($116,318) $275,250

10.0 24 240 $2,683 $8,446 $444 $507 ($6,122) $5,959 $248.28

20.0 300 6,000 $33,540 $105,576 $11,104 $12,683 ($76,525) $86,378 $287.93

30.0 492 14,760 $55,005 $173,145 $27,315 $31,200 ($125,500) $161,164 $327.57

40.0 96 3,840 $10,733 $33,784 $7,106.31 $8,117 ($24,488) $35,253 $367.21 Total - Roll-Offs 912 24,840 $101,961 $320,952 $45,969 $52,507 ($232,635) $288,753 Unit Costs Applied to Rates $111.80/Lift $351.92/Lift $1.85/CY $2.11/CY ($255.08)/Lift Grand Total 1,368 70,272 $152,941 $481,427 $130,045 $148,541 ($348,953) $564,003 Target Revenue $152,941 $481,427 $130,045 $148,541 ($348,953) $564,003

1. Includes Container, Resource Recovery, Rate-Funded Capital, and Street Sweeping Costs.

2. Compactors are allowed an additional ton in their maximum weight limit vs. containers; additionally, compactor waste is more dense. Therefore, rates reflect higher tonnages disposed from similar size containers. This difference can only be estimated since actual weight differences of Compactors vs. Roll-Offs are unknown.

Roll-Offs
Less NonRate Rev.Roll-Off
Collection
Transfer
Station
Total
Annual
Costs
Rate 2
($/lift)
Roll-off
Compactors
Size
Total
Lifts/yr.

Total Vol.
(CY/yr.) Admin.

All Other
Costs1 Type
Cost Allocation Basis Summary of 2018 ROLL-OFFS (Unscheduled):

Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 34
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Cannabis Rates – The City is implementing a cannabis program, like many other California communities, and needs separate disposal rates for cannabis due to new State requirements on how it is handled and disposed. Based on the cost information provided by the City, these rates were calculated using the following components: (1) cost of the driver; (2) cost of the truck; and, (3) cost of disposal. The new rates are shown in Figure 37.

Figure 37. Proposed Monthly Cannabis Rates
Final Rate Adjustments – The solid waste rates for residential, commercial, and roll-off containers were adjusted based on the cost-of-service analysis for FY 2019/20. After FY 2019/20, the annual 3-percent rate increases were applied across-the-board through FY 2022/23. The detailed rates for commercial containers, roll-offs, and roll-off compactors are provided in Appendix C.

Cannabis Collection/Disposal Rates:

Cost Factor $/unit Units No. of Units Cost
Driver $45.00 hours 0.5 $22.50
Truck $10.00 hours 0.5 $5.00
Total (Driver & Truck)/pickup $27.50
Disposal $2.25 32 gal. bag 1 $2.25
Cannabis Collection Disposal Rates ($ per pickup):

Driver/Truck Disposal $/pickup
One 32 gal. bag $27.50 $2.25 $29.75
Two 32 gal. bag $27.50 $4.50 $32.00
Three 32 gal. bag $27.50 $6.75 $34.25
Four 32 gal. bag $27.50 $9.00 $36.50
No. of Bags Collected Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 35
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 6. Recommendations and Next Steps
Consultant Recommendations
This rate study reflects input from City staff and the Utility Rate Advisory Group and is intended to meet the requirements of Proposition 218. Public hearings and protest balloting requirements are the next steps required to complete the adoption and implementation process. As a part of this process, NBS recommends the City take the following actions:
 Approve and Accept This Study Report: NBS recommends the City Council formally approve and adopt this report and its recommendations. This will provide the documentation and administrative record necessary to adopt and implement the proposed rates.  Implement Recommended Levels of Rate Increases and Proposed Rates: Based on successfully meeting the Proposition 218 requirements, the City Council should proceed with implementing the rate increases and rate structures recommended in this report for each utility over the next four years (see Figure 10, Figure 17, Figure 28, Figure 29, Figure 32, and Figure 34, plus more detailed solid waste rate tables in Appendix C). These rate increases are necessary to ensure the continued financial well-being of the City’s water, wastewater and solid waste utilities. No structural changes are recommended for any of the utilities, although cannabis collection and disposal have been added to the solid waste rates.
 Adopt Reserve Fund Targets: NBS recommends the City Council continue with the recommended reserve fund targets for each utility presented in this report. While there are variations in reserve targets used in the industry, those recommended in this report are intended to maintain and/or strengthen the financial health of the utilities. The City should periodically evaluate reserve levels with the purpose of maintaining the following levels for the Operating and Capital Reserves:
 Operating Reserves – 90 days (i.e., 25%) of operating expenses for the water, sewer and solid waste utilities, although City staff have decided to increase the operating reserves for the water utility to 120 days and decrease for the solid waste utility to 30 days.  Capital Reserves – Three percent of net assets for the water and sewer utilities which equates to a 33-year life expectancy of water and sewer assets and provides a reasonable target for future planning purposes.

Next Steps
Annually Review Rates and Revenue – Any time an agency adopts new utility rates, those new rates should be closely monitored over the next several years to ensure the revenue generated is sufficient to meet the annual revenue requirements. Changing economic and drought-related water consumption patterns underscore the need for this review, as well as potential and unseen changing revenue requirements, particularly those related to environmental regulations that can significantly affect capital improvements and repair and replacement costs.

Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 36
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Principal Assumptions and Considerations
In preparing this report and the recommendations included herein, NBS has relied on a number of principal assumptions and considerations with regard to financial matters, including the City’s utility budgets, number of customer accounts, water consumption records, and other conditions and events that may occur in the future. This information and these assumptions were provided by sources we believe to be reliable, although NBS has not independently verified this data.

While we believe NBS’ use of such information and assumptions is reasonable for the purpose of this report and its recommendations, some assumptions will invariably not materialize as stated herein or may vary significantly due to unanticipated events and circumstances. Therefore, the actual results can be expected to vary from those projected to the extent that actual future conditions differ from those assumed by us or provided to us by others.

Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS – February 2020 37
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 7. Abbreviations and Acronyms12
AAF
AF
Alt.

Avg.

AWWA
BMP
BOD
CA
CAP
CCF
CCI
COD
COM
Comm.

COS
COSA
CPI
CIP
DU
Excl.

ENR
EDU
Exp.

FP
FY
FY 2019/20
GPD
GPM
HCF
Ind.

Irr.

LAIF
Lbs.

MFR
MGD
MG/L
Mo.

Muni.

NH3
NPV
N/A
O&M
Prop 13
Prop 218
Req’t
Res.

Rev.

RTS

12 This section identifies abbreviations and acronyms that may be used in this report. This section has not been viewed, arranged, or edited by an attorney, nor should it be relied on as legal advice. The intent of this section is to support the recognition and analysis of this report. Any questions regarding clarification of this document should be directed to staff or an attorney specializing in this particular subject matter.

Average Annual Flow
Acre Foot, equal to 435.6 HCF/CCF or 325,851 gallons
Alternative
Average
American Water Works Association
Best Management Practice
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Customer
Capacity
Hundred Cubic Feet (same as HCF); equal to 748 gallons
Construction Cost Index
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Commodity
Commercial
Cost of Service
Cost of Service Analysis
Consumer Price Index
Capital Improvement Program
Dwelling Unit
Exclude
Engineering News Record
Equivalent Dwelling Unit
Expense
Fire Protection
Fiscal Year (e.g., July 1st to June 30th)
July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020
Gallons per Day
Gallons per Minute
Hundred Cubic Feet; equal to 748 gallons or 1 CCF
Industrial
Irrigation
Local Agency Investment Fund
Pounds
Multi-Family Residential
Million Gallons per Day
Milligrams per Liter
Month
Municipal
Ammonia
Net Present Value
Not Available or Not Applicable
Operational and Maintenance Expenses
Proposition 13 (1978) – Article XIIIA of the California Constitution which limits taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of such property.

Proposition 218 (1996) – State Constitutional amendment expanded restrictions of local government revenue collections.

Requirement
Residential
Revenue
Readiness-to-Serve
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 38
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Section 7. Abbreviations and Acronyms, cont.

R&R
SFR
SRF Loan
SWRCB

TSS / SS
V. / Vs. / vs.

WWTP
Rehabilitation and Replacement
Single Family Residential
State Revolving Fund Loan
State Water Resources Control Board
Total Suspended Solids
Versus
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Rate Study Update Project) Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 39
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A–Additional Water Rate Study Tables
TABLE 1 : FINANCIAL PLAN AND SUMMARY OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Sources of Water Funds
Rate Revenue Under Prevailing Rates $ 22,557,780 $ 22,631,854 $ 22,708,121 $ 22,786,581 $ 22,866,991 $ 22,949,837 $ 23,035,120 $ 23,123,083 $ 23,213,970 $ 23,308,025 $ 23,405,491 $ 23,506,855 Non-Rate Revenue 508,490 520,798 535,291 550,282 565,793 581,848 598,472 615,693 633,540 652,043 671,237 691,154 Interest Earnings 3 118,530 542,063 510,160 440,566 415,435 470,418 511,661 430,090 293,293 184,255 196,756 153,018 Total Sources of Funds $ 23,184,800 $ 23,694,715 $ 23,753,572 $ 23,777,430 $ 23,848,219 $ 24,002,103 $ 24,145,253 $ 24,168,867 $ 24,140,803 $ 24,144,322 $ 24,273,483 $ 24,351,028 Uses of Water Funds
Operating Expenses:

Personnel $ 4,347,930 $ 4,490,120 $ 4,717,040 $ 4,848,251 $ 4,993,699 $ 5,143,510 $ 5,297,815 $ 5,456,749 $ 5,620,452 $ 5,789,065 $ 5,962,737 $ 6,141,620 Operating & Materials (Materials, Supplies & Svcs) 5,687,452 6,357,270 6,165,130 6,306,928 6,451,987 6,600,383 6,752,192 6,907,492 7,066,365 7,228,891 7,395,155 7,565,244 Cost Allocation & Interdepartmental Charges 5,059,740 5,062,220 5,464,530 5,609,340 5,757,988 5,910,574 6,067,204 6,227,985 6,393,027 6,562,442 6,736,347 6,914,860 Subtotal: Operating Expenses $ 15,095,122 $ 15,909,610 $ 16,346,700 $ 16,764,519 $ 17,203,674 $ 17,654,467 $ 18,117,211 $ 18,592,227 $ 19,079,843 $ 19,580,399 $ 20,094,240 $ 20,621,724 Other Expenditures:

Existing Debt Service 4 $ 342,061 $ 354,924 $ 354,924 $ 354,439 $ 355,895 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Future Debt Service - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rate-Funded Capital Expenses - - 190,974 3,717,372 2,546,505 2,933,132 2,515,503 7,491,144 15,118,606 17,728,746 24,347,000 23,250,022 Subtotal: Other Expenditures $ 342,061 $ 354,924 $ 545,898 $ 4,071,811 $ 2,902,401 $ 2,933,132 $ 2,515,503 $ 7,491,144 $ 15,118,606 $ 17,728,746 $ 24,347,000 $ 23,250,022 Total Uses of Water Funds $ 15,437,183 $ 16,264,534 $ 16,892,598 $ 20,836,331 $ 20,106,074 $ 20,587,599 $ 20,632,714 $ 26,083,372 $ 34,198,449 $ 37,309,145 $ 44,441,240 $ 43,871,746 Plus: Revenue from Rate Increases 5
- 452,637 1,852,983 2,845,224 3,884,154 4,972,149 6,391,913 9,370,262 12,669,199 16,323,385 20,371,357 23,976,897 Increase/Decrease to Reserves $ 7,747,617 $ 7,882,818 $ 8,713,957 $ 5,786,323 $ 7,626,299 $ 8,386,653 $ 9,904,452 $ 7,455,757 $ 2,611,552 $ 3,158,562 $ 203,600 $ 4,456,179 Net Revenue Req't. (Total Uses less Non-Rate Revenue) $ 14,810,163 $ 15,201,673 $ 15,847,147 $ 19,845,482 $ 19,124,847 $ 19,535,333 $ 19,522,581 $ 25,037,588 $ 33,271,617 $ 36,472,847 $ 43,573,248 $ 43,027,573 Total Rate Revenue After Rate Increases $ 22,557,780 $ 23,084,491 $ 24,561,104 $ 25,631,805 $ 26,751,145 $ 27,921,986 $ 29,427,033 $ 32,493,345 $ 35,883,169 $ 39,631,410 $ 43,776,848 $ 47,483,752 Projected Annual Rate Revenue Increase 0.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 5.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 8.00% Cumulative Increase from Annual Revenue Increases 0.00% 4.00% 8.16% 12.49% 16.99% 21.67% 27.75% 40.52% 54.58% 70.03% 87.04% 102.00% Debt Coverage Without Rate Increase 6

23.64 21.93 20.86 19.78 18.66 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Debt Coverage With Rate Increase 6

23.64 23.20 26.08 27.81 29.58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1. Revenue for FY 2017/18 & 2018/19 is per the City's Proforma (source file: REDDING_Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx ) and expenses are per the City's Budget (source file: REDDING_doc20190617092128 (Water).pdf ).

2. Revenue and expenses for FY 2017/18 are based on actuals. Source file: REDDING_Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx & REDDING_doc20190617092128 (Water).pdf.

3. Interest Earnings are for Operating, Capital Rehabilitation & Replacement, and Pump House 1 Reserves.

4. Approximately 49% of annual debt service is allocated to water rates; the remaining is allocated to capacity fees (new development).

5. Initial rate increases are anticipated to be effective January 1st and July 1st each year thereafter.

6. Debt coverage requirement is 1.25 or greater per Official Statement. Source file: REDDING_Water & Wastewater 2013 Refunding Revenue Bonds.pdf .

RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 1
Projected
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 40
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

TABLE 2 : RESERVE FUND SUMMARY
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Un-Restricted Reserves:

Operating Reserve
Beginning Reserve Balance 2 $ 4,770,635 $ 5,031,707 $ 5,303,203 $ 5,448,900 $ 5,588,173 $ 5,734,558 $ 5,884,822 $ 6,039,070 $ 6,197,409 $ 6,359,948 $ 6,526,800 $ 3,904,010 Plus: Net Cash Flow (After Rate Increases) 7,747,617 7,882,818 8,713,957 5,786,323 7,626,299 9,057,854 11,683,887 9,378,329 3,608,824 3,184,924 (860,645) 4,042,931 Plus: Expected Savings @ 1.5% Pers/O&M 150,531 162,711 163,233 167,328 171,685 176,158 180,750 185,464 190,302 195,269 200,368 205,603 Plus: Expected Savings @ 3% Capital 53,894 305,703 410,913 342,755 207,177 269,615 270,394 456,512 635,691 549,609 769,813 697,501 Plus: Transfer of Debt Reserve Surplus - - - - - - - - - - - - Less: Transfer Out to Pump House 1 Fund 3 $ (1,353,467) $ (1,385,069) $ (1,473,666) $ (1,537,908) $ (1,605,069) $ (1,715,591) $ (1,833,894) $ (1,960,556) $ (2,096,199) $ (2,315,161) $ (2,557,326) $ (2,825,242) Less: Transfer Out to Rolling Stock Reserve $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) $ (175,000) Less: Transfer Out to Capital Replacement Reserve (6,162,502) (6,519,666) (7,493,739) (4,444,224) (6,078,708) (7,462,772) (9,971,889) (7,726,411) (2,001,079) (1,272,790) - - Ending Operating Reserve Balance $ 5,031,707 $ 5,303,203 $ 5,448,900 $ 5,588,173 $ 5,734,558 $ 5,884,822 $ 6,039,070 $ 6,197,409 $ 6,359,948 $ 6,526,800 $ 3,904,010 $ 5,849,803 Target Ending Balance, 120 days Operating Expenses 4 $ 5,031,707 $ 5,303,203 $ 5,448,900 $ 5,588,173 $ 5,734,558 $ 5,884,822 $ 6,039,070 $ 6,197,409 $ 6,359,948 $ 6,526,800 $ 6,698,080 $ 6,873,908 Capital Rehabilitation & Replacement Reserve
Beginning Reserve Balance $ 14,279,789 $ 18,645,837 $ 14,975,393 $ 8,963,018 $ 5,699,459 $ 7,418,764 $ 8,827,512 $ 11,670,831 $ 9,960,162 $ 3,978,535 $ 3,605,700 $ 2,203,166 Plus: Grant Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - -
Plus: Transfer of Operating Reserve Surplus 6,162,502 6,519,666 7,493,739 4,444,224 6,078,708 7,462,772 9,971,889 7,726,411 2,001,079 1,272,790 - - Less: Use of Reserves for Capital Projects (1,796,454) (10,190,110) (13,506,114) (7,707,782) (4,359,403) (6,054,024) (7,128,570) (9,437,079) (7,982,706) (1,645,624) (1,402,534) - Ending Capital R&R Reserve Balance $ 18,645,837 $ 14,975,393 $ 8,963,018 $ 5,699,459 $ 7,418,764 $ 8,827,512 $ 11,670,831 $ 9,960,162 $ 3,978,535 $ 3,605,700 $ 2,203,166 $ 2,203,166 Target Ending Balance, 5% Minimum of Total Expenses 5 $ 1,334,526 $ 1,589,510 $ 1,469,279 $ 1,255,235 $ 1,340,057 $ 1,364,741 $ 1,698,942 $ 2,233,751 $ 1,977,456 $ 2,332,911 $ 2,203,166 $ 2,273,686 $ 23,677,544 $ 20,278,597 $ 14,411,918 $ 11,287,632 $ 13,153,322 $ 14,712,334 $ 17,709,901 $ 16,157,571 $ 10,338,483 $ 10,132,500 $ 6,107,176 $ 8,052,969 Minimum Target Ending Balance $ 6,366,233 $ 6,892,713 $ 6,918,179 $ 6,843,409 $ 7,074,615 $ 7,249,563 $ 7,738,013 $ 8,431,161 $ 8,337,403 $ 8,859,710 $ 8,901,246 $ 9,147,594 Ending Surplus/(Deficit) vs. Minimum Reserve Targets $ 17,311,311 $ 13,385,883 $ 7,493,738 $ 4,444,223 $ 6,078,707 $ 7,462,771 $ 9,971,888 $ 7,726,410 $ 2,001,079 $ 1,272,789 $ (2,794,070) $ (1,094,624) Days Cash on Hand 560 456 315 241 274 305 357 318 198 189 111 143 Rolling Stock Reserve (9193-70)
Beginning Reserve Balance 6 $ 729,747 $ 491,308 $ 569,091 $ 623,106 $ 522,977 $ 648,762 $ 708,540 $ 767,265 $ 856,920 $ 845,495 $ 1,033,889 $ 1,225,268 Plus: Sale of Rolling Stock 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - Plus: Transfer of Operating Reserve Surplus 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Plus: Interest Earnings 11,561 7,783 9,015 9,871 8,285 10,278 11,225 12,155 13,575 13,394 16,379 19,411 Less: Use of Reserves for Vehicle Purchase (435,000) (115,000) (140,000) (295,000) (60,000) (128,000) (130,000) (100,000) (200,000) - - - Ending Rolling Stock Reserve Balance $ 491,308 $ 569,091 $ 623,106 $ 522,977 $ 648,762 $ 708,540 $ 767,265 $ 856,920 $ 845,495 $ 1,033,889 $ 1,225,268 $ 1,419,679 Target Ending Balance 7 $ 510,000 $ 520,000 $ 530,000 $ 540,000 $ 550,000 $ 560,000 $ 570,000 $ 590,000 $ 610,000 $ 630,000 $ 650,000 $ 670,000 Pump House 1 Reserve
Beginning Reserve Balance 8 $ 9,186,029 $ 10,539,496 $ 11,924,565 $ 13,398,231 $ 14,936,140 $ 16,541,208 $ 18,256,800 $ 11,258,694 $ 4,387,249 $ 2,409,123 $ 2,376,522 $ 2,487,628 Plus: Transfer of 6% rate revenue 1,353,467 1,385,069 1,473,666 1,537,908 1,605,069 1,715,591 1,833,894 1,960,556 2,096,199 2,315,161 2,557,326 2,825,242 Less: Use of Reserves for Capital Purchase - - - - - - (8,832,000) (8,832,000) (4,074,325) (2,347,762) (2,446,221) - Ending Pump House 1 Reserve Balance $ 10,539,496 $ 11,924,565 $ 13,398,231 $ 14,936,140 $ 16,541,208 $ 18,256,800 $ 11,258,694 $ 4,387,249 $ 2,409,123 $ 2,376,522 $ 2,487,628 $ 5,312,869 Target Ending Balance 9 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Balance - O&M and Cap R&R Reserves

SUMMARY OF CASH ACTIVITY
Projected
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 41
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

TABLE 3 : RESERVE FUND SUMMARY, cont.

Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Restricted Reserves:

Debt Reserve
Beginning Reserve Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Plus: Interest Earnings - - - - - - - - - - - -
Less: Transfer of Surplus to Operating Reserve - - - - - - - - - - - - Ending Debt Reserve Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Target Ending Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Bond Project Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Plus: SRF Loan Funding Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - Plus: Revenue Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - -
Less: Use of Bond & Loan Funds for Capital Projects - - - - - - - - - - - - Ending Bond Project Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Target Ending Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Impact Fee Reserve
Beginning Reserve Balance 10 $ 1,867,057 $ 2,185,368 $ 2,440,579 $ 1,637,199 $ 1,409,408 $ 1,437,201 $ 2,376,124 $ 3,396,839 $ 4,504,326 $ 1,608,719 $ 1,434,685 $ 2,087,899 Plus: Impact Fee Revenue 770,370 825,659 883,977 938,258 1,002,825 1,070,881 1,142,594 1,218,142 1,306,362 1,399,435 1,506,901 1,620,394 Plus: Interest Earnings 29,578 34,620 38,663 25,936 22,328 22,768 37,642 53,812 71,357 25,485 22,728 33,076 Less: Use of Reserves for Debt Funding (362,639) (376,276) (376,276) (375,761) (377,305) - - - - - - - Less: Use of Reserves for Capital Projects (122,679) (235,870) (1,391,490) (841,468) (639,232) (159,511) (164,455) (169,553) (4,405,492) (1,648,406) (903,521) (191,576) Plus: Expected Savings @3% Capital 3,680 7,076 41,745 25,244 19,177 4,785 4,934 5,087 132,165 49,452 27,106 5,747 Ending Impact Fee Fund Balance $ 2,185,368 $ 2,440,579 $ 1,637,199 $ 1,409,408 $ 1,437,201 $ 2,376,124 $ 3,396,839 $ 4,504,326 $ 1,608,719 $ 1,434,685 $ 2,087,899 $ 3,555,540 Annual Interest Earnings Rate 11 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58%

1. Beginning cash balance for Fiscal Year 2017/18 is per FY 2016/17 CAFR. Source file: REDDING_ CAFR FYE June 30, 2017.pdf, page 46.

2. Beginning Operating Reserve balance for FY 2017/18 is the total beginning cash net of cash allocated to reserved funds via proforma. Source file: REDDING_Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx .

3. 6% of all rate revenue is allocated to the Pump House 1 reserve until FY 2029/30 when project is completed.

4. The City maintains 90 days or 25% of Operating Expenses as an Operating reserve.

5. The City maintains a 5% minimum reserve requirement for Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement.

6. Beginning Rolling Stock Reserve balance for FY 2017/18 is per water proforma. Source file: REDDING_Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx . City policy is to transfer 6% of rate revenue to the Pump House 1 reserve fund.

7. Target balance for the rolling stock reserve is set equal to $500K.

8. Beginning Pump House 1 Reserve balance for FY 2017/18 is per water proforma. Source file: REDDING_Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx .

9. Target balance for Pump House 1 Reserve is zero. Requested explanation from the City.

10. Beginning Impact Fee Reserve balance for FY 2017/18 is per water proforma. Source file: REDDING_Water Proforma for NBS.xlsx .

11. Interest earning rate based on the City's Pooled Cash Interest Rate. Source file: December 2018_Int Earning.pdf .

SUMMARY OF CASH ACTIVITY
Projected
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 42
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.
$ mil.
$10 mil.
$20 mil.
$30 mil.
$40 mil.
$50 mil.
$60 mil.
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Annual Obligations Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Water Revenue Requirements vs.

Revenue Under Existing and Increased Rates
Recommended Rate Scenario
Reserve Funded Capital Expenses
Rate Funded Capital Expenses
Rolling Stock Expenses
Debt Service
O&M Expenses
Revenues under Existing Rates
Revenues under Increased Rates
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Water Utility - Ending Cash Balances vs.

Recommended Reserve Targets
Ending Cash Balance
Rolling Stock Reserve
Minimum Target Reserve Balance

4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%

6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 6.50%

10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Projected Increases to Rate Revenue
560
456
315
241
274
305
357
318
198 189
111
143
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Number of Days Cash on Hand Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Number of Days Cash on Hand
Days Cash on Hand
120 Day Operating Reserve Target
150-Days Cash on Hand Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 43
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

TABLE 11 : CAPITAL FUNDING SUMMARY
CAPITAL FUNDING FORECAST Actuals Budget
FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Use of Impact Fee Reserves 124,714 122,679 235,870 1,391,490 841,468 639,232 159,511 164,455 169,553 4,405,492 1,648,406 903,521 191,576 SRF Loan Funding - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Use of Future Revenue Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - Use of Capital Rehabilitation and Replacement Reserve 2,351,742 1,796,454 10,190,110 13,506,114 7,707,782 4,359,403 6,054,024 7,128,570 9,437,079 7,982,706 1,645,624 1,402,534 - Rate Revenue - - - 190,974 3,717,372 2,546,505 2,933,132 1,884,573 5,779,982 13,206,988 16,674,683 24,257,915 23,250,022 Total Sources of Capital Funds $ 2,476,456 $ 1,919,133 $ 10,425,980 $ 15,088,578 $ 12,266,623 $ 7,545,140 $ 9,146,667 $ 9,177,599 $ 15,386,615 $ 25,595,186 $ 19,968,714 $ 26,563,970 $ 23,441,598 Uses of Capital Funds:

Total Project Costs $ 2,476,456 $ 1,919,133 $ 10,425,980 $ 15,088,578 $ 12,266,623 $ 7,545,140 $ 9,146,667 $ 9,177,599 $ 15,386,615 $ 25,595,186 $ 19,968,714 $ 26,563,970 $ 23,441,598 Capital Funding Surplus (Deficiency) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SRF Loan Funding $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Future Revenue Bond Proceeds $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Projected
Funding Sources:

TABLE 14 : EXISTING DEBT OBLIGATIONS
EXISTING DEBT OBLIGATIONS Actuals Budget
Annual Repayment Schedules: FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Water Share Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2013 Series 1
Principal Payment 2 $ 555,000 $ 570,000 $ 625,000 $ 650,000 $ 675,000 $ 705,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Interest Payment 156,900 134,700 106,200 81,200 55,200 28,200 - - - - - - - Subtotal: Annual Debt Service $ 711,900 $ 704,700 $ 731,200 $ 731,200 $ 730,200 $ 733,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Coverage Requirement ($-Amnt above annual payment) 3 $ 889,875 $ 880,875 $ 914,000 $ 914,000 $ 912,750 $ 916,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Reserve Requirement (total fund balance) 4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total: Existing Annual Debt Service $ 711,900 $ 704,700 $ 731,200 $ 731,200 $ 730,200 $ 733,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Service Allocated to Rate Revenue $ 345,556 $ 342,061 $ 354,924 $ 354,924 $ 354,439 $ 355,895 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Service Allocated to Wastewater Utility $ 366,344 $ 362,639 $ 376,276 $ 376,276 $ 375,761 $ 377,305 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total: Existing Annual Coverage Requirement $ 889,875 $ 880,875 $ 914,000 $ 914,000 $ 912,750 $ 916,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total: Existing Debt Reserve Target $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

1. Official Statement describes the bond was used to refund 2003A Water Certificates & 2002 Wastewater Certificates. Source file: Water & Wastewater 2013 Refunding Revenue Bonds, page 5.

2. Full Debt Service Schedule from Official Statement. Water's share developed as net of Wastewater payment. Source files: Water & Wastewater 2013 Refunding Revenue bonds, page 5 and Wastewater Debt Service, page 1 .

3. Net revenues must be at least equal to 1.25 times the annual debt service payment. Source file: Water & Wastewater 2013 Refunding Revenue Bonds, page 10.

4. There are no reserve fund requirements for this debt issuance. Source file: Water & Wastewater 2013 Refunding Revenue Bonds, page 11.

Projected
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 44
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

TABLE 20 : ADJUSTMENTS TO CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENSES
Classification of Expenses
Adjustments to Classification of Expenses
Adjustment for Current Rate Level: Total COM CAP CA
Target Rate Rev. After Rate Increases** $ 23,537,128
Projected Rate Revenue at Current Rates 22,631,854
Rate Increase (FY 2019/20) 4.0%
Adjusted Net Revenue Req'ts $ 23,537,128 $ 8,396,402 $ 12,652,370 $ 2,488,357 Percent of Revenue 35.7% 53.8% 10.6%
Variable (Volumetric Rates) 35.7%
Fixed Charges 64.3%
** Proposed FY 2019/20 rates are effective January 1, 2020. Assume 12 months of revenue vs. the partial revenue shown in the financial plan.

TABLE 21 : CURRENT RATE DESIGN - NET REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable % 100% 60.0% 29.4% 10.6% Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable ($) $ 23,537,128 $ 14,122,277 $ 6,926,495 $ 2,488,357 Variable (Volumetric Rates) 60%
Fixed Charges 40%
Alternative #1 - Current Rate Design
(40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
Total Rate Revenue
Requirements FY
Commodity
Related Costs
Capacity Related
Costs
Customer Related
Costs
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 45
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable % 100% 55.0% 34.4% 10.6% Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable ($) $ 23,537,128 $ 12,945,421 $ 8,103,351 $ 2,488,357 Variable (Volumetric Rates) 55%
Fixed Charges 45%
Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable % 100% 36.0% 53.4% 10.6% Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable ($) $ 23,537,128 $ 8,473,366 $ 12,575,405 $ 2,488,357 Variable (Volumetric Rates) 36%
Fixed Charges 64%
Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable % 100% 29.0% 60.4% 10.6% Rate-Design Adjustments to Fixed/Variable ($) $ 23,537,128 $ 6,825,767 $ 14,223,004 $ 2,488,357 Variable (Volumetric Rates) 29%
Fixed Charges 71%
Total Rate Revenue
Requirements FY
Commodity
Related Costs
Capacity Related
Costs
Customer Related
Costs
Alternative #4 - Net Revenue Requirements
(71% Fixed / 29% Variable)
Customer Related
Costs
Customer Related
Costs
Capacity Related
Costs
Alternative #2 - Net Revenue Requirements
(45% Fixed / 55% Variable)
Total Rate Revenue
Requirements FY
Commodity
Related Costs
Capacity Related
Costs
Total Rate Revenue
Requirements FY
Alternative #3 - Net Revenue Requirements
(64% Fixed / 36% Variable)
Commodity
Related Costs
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 46
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

TABLE 25 : ALLOCATION OF WATER REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
Commodity-Related Costs Variable $ 14,122,277 60.0% $ 12,945,421 55.0% $ 8,473,366 36.0% $ 6,825,767 29.0% Capacity-Related Costs Fixed 6,926,495 29.4% 8,103,351 34.4% 12,575,405 53.4% 14,223,004 60.4% Customer-Related Costs Fixed 2,488,357 10.6% 2,488,357 10.6% 2,488,357 10.6% 2,488,357 10.6% Net Revenue Requirement $ 23,537,128 100% $ 23,537,128 100% $ 23,537,128 100% $ 23,537,128 100%

1. To make sure rates are based on the full net revenue requirements, these rates assume 12 months of revenue vs. the 6 months of revenue shown in the financial plan.

Alternative #4 - Net Revenue
Requirements
(71% Fixed / 29% Variable)
Unadjusted Net Revenue
Requirements (2019/20)
Classification Components
Alternative #3 - Net Revenue
Requirements
(64% Fixed / 36% Variable)
Unadjusted Net Revenue
Requirements (2019/20)
Alternative #2 - Net Revenue
Requirements
(45% Fixed / 55% Variable)
Adjusted Net Revenue Requirements
(2019/20)
Alternative #1 - Current Rate
Design
(40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
Adjusted Net Revenue
Requirements (2019/20) 1
Fixed and
Variable Cost
Allocations
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 47
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

TABLE 27 : ALLOCATION OF ADJUSTED NET REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Current Rate Design (40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
Commodity Capacity Customer
Single Family $ 8,480,788 $ 4,393,343 $ 2,028,251 $ 14,902,383 63.3% Multi-Family 1,517,340 580,904 187,743 2,285,987 9.7%
Commercial 2,179,134 935,703 182,878 3,297,715 14.0%
Industrial 643,061 356,847 32,492 1,032,401 4.4%
Institutional 1,301,952 659,698 56,992 2,018,643 8.6%
Total $ 14,122,277 $ 6,926,495 $ 2,488,357 $ 23,537,128 100.0% Total Vol. and Fixed Rate Rev. $ 14,122,277 $ 23,537,128

1. This total is higher than shown in the financial plan, which reflects revenue expected for a partial year, whereas the revenue used to set rates needs to assume an entire year of rate revenue.

TABLE 28 : CALCULATION OF MONTHLY FIXED METER SERVICE CHARGES Current Rate Design (40% Fixed / 60% Variable) 5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Hydraulic Capacity Factor 3 1.00 1.50 2.50 5.00 8.00 16.00 25.00 50.00 80.00 Total Equivalent Meters 25,340 1,332 3,608 1,685 4,288 864 575 700 320 38,712 Monthly Fixed Service Charges
Customer Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 4 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 Capacity Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 5 $14.91 $22.37 $37.28 $74.55 $119.28 $238.57 $372.76 $745.53 $1,192.84 Total Monthly Meter Charge $22.15 $29.61 $44.52 $81.79 $126.52 $245.81 $380.00 $752.77 $1,200.08 Annual Fixed Costs Allocated to Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Costs $ 2,488,357
Capacity Costs & Fire Costs 6,926,495
Total Fixed Meter Costs $ 9,414,851
Annual Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Charges $ 2,201,716 $ 77,156 $ 125,378 $ 29,281 $ 46,571 $ 4,692 $ 1,998 $ 1,216 $ 348 $ 2,488,357 Capacity Charges 4,533,985 238,329 645,476 301,490 767,235 154,592 102,882 125,248 57,256 6,926,495 Total Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges $ 6,735,702 $ 315,485 $ 770,854 $ 330,771 $ 813,806 $ 159,284 $ 104,881 $ 126,465 $ 57,604 $ 9,414,851

1. Number of meters by size and class are from the City of Redding utility billing system. Source: REDDING_Summary Revenue - UPDATED 06-19-2019.xlsx .

2. Single Family 3/4" and 5/8" meters reflect building codes rather than actual use and are combined here because they have equivalent usage patterns.

3. Source: AWWA Manual M1, "Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges", Table VI.2-5. Assumes displacement meters for 5/8 through 2 inch meters, Compound 3 - 8 inch meters, Turbine for 10 & 12 inch, unless noted otherwise.

4. Customer costs are allocated to each customer by dividing the total customer costs by the total number of customers.

5. Capacity costs are allocated by meter size and the hydraulic capacity of the meter.

TABLE 29 : PROJECTED REVENUE FROM FIXED CHARGES BY CUSTOMER CLASS Current Rate Design (40% Fixed / 60% Variable) 5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Fixed Charges by Meter Size $22.15 $29.61 $44.52 $81.79 $126.52 $245.81 $380.00 $752.77 $1,200.08 Revenue from Fixed Charges
Single Family 2 $ 6,075,157 $ - $ 256,951 $ 3,926 $ 9,110 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,345,144 Multi-Family 285,749 162,361 226,502 79,503 165,494 20,648 9,120 54,199 - 1,003,576 Commercial 259,434 100,898 204,599 167,839 390,202 67,843 41,040 9,033 - 1,240,889 Industrial 47,315 22,382 33,121 24,538 63,768 2,950 4,560 9,033 - 207,667 Institutional 68,048 29,843 49,681 54,965 185,232 67,843 50,160 54,199 57,604 617,576 Total Revenue - Fixed Charges $ 9,414,851
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1
June 2018 - May 2019
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1
June 2018 - May 2019
Total
Customer Class
COS Net
Rev. Req'ts 1
% of COS Net
Revenue Req'ts
Cost Classification Components
$9,414,851
Total
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 48
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

Alternative #2 - Net Revenue Requirements
(45% Fixed / 55% Variable)
Commodity Capacity Customer
Single Family $ 7,774,056 $ 5,139,801 $ 2,028,251 $ 14,942,108 63.5% Multi-Family 1,390,895 679,603 187,743 2,258,242 9.6%
Commercial 1,997,540 1,094,684 182,878 3,275,102 13.9%
Industrial 589,473 417,477 32,492 1,039,443 4.4%
Institutional 1,193,456 771,785 56,992 2,022,234 8.6%
Total $ 12,945,421 $ 8,103,351 $ 2,488,357 $ 23,537,128 100.0% Total Volumetric and Fixed Rate Rev. $ 12,945,421 $ 23,537,128 Alternative #2 - Net Revenue Requirements
(45% Fixed / 55% Variable)
5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Hydraulic Capacity Factor 3 1.00 1.50 2.50 5.00 8.00 16.00 25.00 50.00 80.00 Total Equivalent Meters 25,340 1,332 3,608 1,685 4,288 864 575 700 320 38,712 Monthly Fixed Service Charges
Customer Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 4 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 Capacity Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 5 $17.44 $26.17 $43.61 $87.22 $139.55 $279.10 $436.10 $872.19 $1,395.51 Total Monthly Meter Charge $24.68 $33.41 $50.85 $94.46 $146.79 $286.34 $443.34 $879.44 $1,402.75 Annual Fixed Costs Allocated to Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Costs $ 2,488,357
Capacity Costs & Fire Costs 8,103,351
Total Fixed Meter Costs $ 10,591,708
Annual Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Charges $ 2,201,716 $ 77,156 $ 125,378 $ 29,281 $ 46,571 $ 4,692 $ 1,998 $ 1,216 $ 348 $ 2,488,357 Capacity Charges 5,304,339 278,823 755,146 352,716 897,593 180,858 120,363 146,529 66,985 8,103,351 Total Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges $ 7,506,055 $ 355,979 $ 880,524 $ 381,996 $ 944,164 $ 185,550 $ 122,361 $ 147,745 $ 67,332 $ 10,591,708 Alternative #2 - Net Revenue Requirements
(45% Fixed / 55% Variable)
5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Fixed Charges by Meter Size $24.68 $33.41 $50.85 $94.46 $146.79 $286.34 $443.34 $879.44 $1,402.75 Revenue from Fixed Charges
Single Family 2 $ 6,769,964 $ - $ 293,508 $ 4,534 $ 10,569 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,078,575 Multi-Family 318,430 183,201 258,726 91,815 192,004 24,053 10,640 63,319 - 1,142,188 Commercial 289,105 113,849 233,708 193,832 452,706 79,031 47,880 10,553 - 1,420,664 Industrial 52,726 25,255 37,833 28,338 73,983 3,436 5,320 10,553 - 237,444 Institutional 75,831 33,674 56,749 63,477 214,903 79,031 58,521 63,319 67,332 712,836 Total Revenue - Fixed Charges $ 10,591,708
Cost Classification Components
$10,591,708
Customer Class Cost of Service Net
Rev. Req'ts
% of COS Net
Revenue Req'ts
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1
June 2018 - May 2019
Total
June 2018 - May 2019
Total Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 49
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

Alternative #3 - Net Revenue Requirements
(64% Fixed / 36% Variable)
Commodity Capacity Customer
Single Family $ 5,088,473 $ 7,976,340 $ 2,028,251.36 $ 15,093,064 64.1% Multi-Family 910,404 1,054,661 187,743 2,152,808 9.1%
Commercial 1,307,481 1,698,816 182,878 3,189,174 13.5%
Industrial 385,837 647,873 32,492 1,066,203 4.5%
Institutional 781,171 1,197,716 56,992 2,035,879 8.6%
Total $ 8,473,366 $ 12,575,405 $ 2,488,357 $ 23,537,128 100.0% Total Volumetric and Fixed Rate Rev. $ 8,473,366 $ 23,537,128 Alternative #3 - Net Revenue Requirements
(64% Fixed / 36% Variable)
5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Hydraulic Capacity Factor 3 1.00 1.50 2.50 5.00 8.00 16.00 25.00 50.00 80.00 Total Equivalent Meters 25,340 1,332 3,608 1,685 4,288 864 575 700 320 38,712 Monthly Fixed Service Charges
Customer Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 4 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 Capacity Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 5 $27.07 $40.61 $67.68 $135.35 $216.57 $433.13 $676.77 $1,353.54 $2,165.66 Total Monthly Meter Charge $34.31 $47.85 $74.92 $142.59 $223.81 $440.37 $684.01 $1,360.78 $2,172.90 Annual Fixed Costs Allocated to Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Costs $ 2,488,357
Capacity Costs & Fire Costs 12,575,405
Total Fixed Meter Costs $ 15,063,762
Annual Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Charges $ 2,201,716 $ 77,156 $ 125,378 $ 29,281 $ 46,571 $ 4,692 $ 1,998 $ 1,216 $ 348 $ 2,488,357 Capacity Charges $ 8,231,682 $ 432,699 $ 1,171,894 $ 547,371 $ 1,392,954 $ 280,670 $ 186,788 $ 227,395 $ 103,952 12,575,405 Total Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges $ 10,433,399 $ 509,855 $ 1,297,272 $ 576,652 $ 1,439,525 $ 285,362 $ 188,787 $ 228,611 $ 104,299 $ 15,063,762 Alternative #3 - Net Revenue Requirements
(64% Fixed / 36% Variable)
5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Fixed Charges by Meter Size $34.31 $47.85 $74.92 $142.59 $223.81 $440.37 $684.01 $1,360.78 $2,172.90 Revenue from Fixed Charges
Single Family 2 $ 9,410,234 $ - $ 432,424 $ 6,845 $ 16,114 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,865,617 Multi-Family 442,617 262,392 381,180 138,602 292,739 36,991 16,416 97,976 - 1,668,913 Commercial 401,855 163,062 344,321 292,604 690,220 121,543 73,873 16,329 - 2,103,807 Industrial 73,289 36,172 55,739 42,778 112,799 5,284 8,208 16,329 - 350,599 Institutional 105,405 48,230 83,608 95,823 327,653 121,543 90,289 97,976 104,299 1,074,826 Total Revenue - Fixed Charges $ 15,063,762
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1
June 2018 - May 2019
Total
June 2018 - May 2019
Total
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1
$15,063,762
Customer Class Cost of Service Net
Rev. Req'ts
% of COS Net
Revenue Req'ts
Cost Classification Components
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 50
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

Alternative #4 - Net Revenue Requirements
(71% Fixed / 29% Variable)
Commodity Capacity Customer
Single Family $ 4,099,048 $ 9,021,380 $ 2,028,251.36 $ 15,148,679 64.4% Multi-Family 733,381 1,192,840 187,743 2,113,964 9.0%
Commercial 1,053,248 1,921,391 182,878 3,157,517 13.4%
Industrial 310,813 732,756 32,492 1,076,062 4.6%
Institutional 629,277 1,354,638 56,992 2,040,907 8.7%
Total $ 6,825,767 $ 14,223,004 $ 2,488,357 $ 23,537,128 100.0% Total Volumetric and Fixed Rate Rev. $ 6,825,767 $ 23,537,128 Alternative #4 - Net Revenue Requirements
(71% Fixed / 29% Variable)
5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Hydraulic Capacity Factor 3 1.00 1.50 2.50 5.00 8.00 16.00 25.00 50.00 80.00 Total Equivalent Meters 25,340 1,332 3,608 1,685 4,288 864 575 700 320 38,712 Monthly Fixed Service Charges
Customer Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 4 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 $7.24 Capacity Costs ($/Acct/mo.) 5 $30.62 $45.93 $76.54 $153.09 $244.94 $489.88 $765.44 $1,530.88 $2,449.40 Total Monthly Meter Charge $37.86 $53.17 $83.78 $160.33 $252.18 $497.12 $772.68 $1,538.12 $2,456.64 Annual Fixed Costs Allocated to Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Costs $ 2,488,357
Capacity Costs & Fire Costs 14,223,004
Total Fixed Meter Costs $ 16,711,361
Annual Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges
Customer Charges $ 2,201,716 $ 77,156 $ 125,378 $ 29,281 $ 46,571 $ 4,692 $ 1,998 $ 1,216 $ 348 $ 2,488,357 Capacity Charges $ 9,310,177 $ 489,391 $ 1,325,433 $ 619,086 $ 1,575,455 $ 317,443 $ 211,261 $ 257,187 $ 117,571 14,223,004 Total Revenue from Monthly Meter Charges $ 11,511,894 $ 566,546 $ 1,450,811 $ 648,367 $ 1,622,027 $ 322,134 $ 213,259 $ 258,404 $ 117,919 $ 16,711,361 Alternative #4 - Net Revenue Requirements
(71% Fixed / 29% Variable)
5/8 inch 3/4 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch 8 inch Single Family 2 22,855 - 481 4 6 - - - - 23,346
Multi-Family 1,075 457 424 81 109 7 2 6 - 2,161
Commercial 976 284 383 171 257 23 9 1 - 2,104
Industrial 178 63 62 25 42 1 1 1 - 373
Institutional 256 84 93 56 122 23 11 6 4 655
Total Meters/Accounts 25,340 888 1,443 337 536 54 23 14 4 28,639 Fixed Charges by Meter Size $37.86 $53.17 $83.78 $160.33 $252.18 $497.12 $772.68 $1,538.12 $2,456.64 Revenue from Fixed Charges
Single Family 2 $ 10,382,965 $ - $ 483,604 $ 7,696 $ 18,157 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,892,421 Multi-Family 488,370 291,567 426,295 155,839 329,852 41,758 18,544 110,744 - 1,862,970 Commercial 443,394 181,193 385,073 328,993 777,726 137,205 83,449 18,457 - 2,355,491 Industrial 80,865 40,194 62,336 48,098 127,099 5,965 9,272 18,457 - 392,287 Institutional 116,300 53,592 93,503 107,741 369,193 137,205 101,994 110,744 117,919 1,208,191 Total Revenue - Fixed Charges $ 16,711,361
$16,711,361
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1 0
Total
Number of Meters
by Class and Size 1 0
Total
Customer Class
Cost Classification Components Cost of Service Net
Rev. Req'ts
% of COS Net
Revenue Req'ts
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 51
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

Alternative #1 - Current Rate Design
(40% Fixed / 60% Variable)
FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Fixed Service Charge
Monthly Fixed Service Charge - Standard Meters:
5/8 inch $21.17 $21.30 $21.30 $21.30 $21.30
3/4 inch $28.04 $28.47 $28.47 $28.47 $28.47
1 inch $41.77 $42.80 $42.80 $42.80 $42.80

1.5 inch $76.09 $78.65 $78.65 $78.65 $78.65
2 inch $117.27 $121.66 $121.66 $121.66 $121.66
3 inch $227.10 $236.35 $236.35 $236.35 $236.35
4 inch $350.66 $365.39 $365.39 $365.39 $365.39
6 inch $693.88 $723.81 $723.81 $723.81 $723.81
8 inch $1,105.75 $1,153.92 $1,153.92 $1,153.92 $1,153.92 Commodity Charges for All Water Consumed
Uniform Rate $1.43 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36
Alternative #2 - Net Revenue Requirements
(45% Fixed / 55% Variable)
FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Fixed Service Charge
Monthly Fixed Service Charge - Standard Meters:
5/8 inch $21.17 $23.74 $23.74 $23.74 $23.74
3/4 inch $28.04 $32.12 $32.12 $32.12 $32.12
1 inch $41.77 $48.89 $48.89 $48.89 $48.89

1.5 inch $76.09 $90.83 $90.83 $90.83 $90.83
2 inch $117.27 $141.15 $141.15 $141.15 $141.15
3 inch $227.10 $275.33 $275.33 $275.33 $275.33
4 inch $350.66 $426.29 $426.29 $426.29 $426.29
6 inch $693.88 $845.61 $845.61 $845.61 $845.61
8 inch $1,105.75 $1,348.80 $1,348.80 $1,348.80 $1,348.80 Commodity Charges for All Water Consumed
Uniform Rate $1.43 $1.24 $1.24 $1.24 $1.24
Current Recommended Rates
Rates
Rate Revenue Increases per Financial Plan:

Current
Rates
Rate Revenue Increases per Financial Plan:

Water Rate Schedule
Water Rate Schedule Rate Alternative #2
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 52
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix A, cont.

Alternative #3 - Net Revenue Requirements
(64% Fixed / 36% Variable)
FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Fixed Service Charge
Monthly Fixed Service Charge - Standard Meters:
5/8 inch $21.17 $32.99 $32.99 $32.99 $32.99
3/4 inch $28.04 $46.01 $46.01 $46.01 $46.01
1 inch $41.77 $72.04 $72.04 $72.04 $72.04

1.5 inch $76.09 $137.11 $137.11 $137.11 $137.11
2 inch $117.27 $215.20 $215.20 $215.20 $215.20
3 inch $227.10 $423.44 $423.44 $423.44 $423.44
4 inch $350.66 $657.70 $657.70 $657.70 $657.70
6 inch $693.88 $1,308.44 $1,308.44 $1,308.44 $1,308.44
8 inch $1,105.75 $2,089.33 $2,089.33 $2,089.33 $2,089.33 Commodity Charges for All Water Consumed
Uniform Rate $1.43 $0.81 $0.81 $0.81 $0.81
Alternative #4 - Net Revenue Requirements
(71% Fixed / 29% Variable)
FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Fixed Service Charge
Monthly Fixed Service Charge - Standard Meters:
5/8 inch $21.17 $36.40 $36.40 $36.40 $36.40
3/4 inch $28.04 $51.12 $51.12 $51.12 $51.12
1 inch $41.77 $80.56 $80.56 $80.56 $80.56

1.5 inch $76.09 $154.16 $154.16 $154.16 $154.16
2 inch $117.27 $242.48 $242.48 $242.48 $242.48
3 inch $227.10 $478.00 $478.00 $478.00 $478.00
4 inch $350.66 $742.96 $742.96 $742.96 $742.96
6 inch $693.88 $1,478.96 $1,478.96 $1,478.96 $1,478.96
8 inch $1,105.75 $2,362.16 $2,362.16 $2,362.16 $2,362.16 Commodity Charges for All Water Consumed
Uniform Rate $1.43 $0.65 $0.65 $0.65 $0.65
Rate Alternative #3
Rate Alternative #4
Rate Revenue Increases per Financial Plan:

Current
Rates
Water Rate Schedule
Water Rate Schedule Current
Rates
Rate Revenue Increases per Financial Plan: Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 53
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding AppendixB– Additional Wastewater Rate Study Tables
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Sources of Wastewater Funds
Rate Revenue Under Prevailing Rates $ 28,961,550 $ 29,056,653 $ 29,154,571 $ 29,255,304 $ 29,358,541 $ 29,464,905 $ 29,574,399 $ 29,687,333 $ 29,804,021 $ 29,924,776 $ 30,049,911 $ 30,180,052 Non-Rate Revenues (11,040) (9,192) (9,152) (9,071) (8,988) (8,904) (8,821) (8,738) (8,655) (8,574) (8,495) (8,418) Interest Earnings (in O&M, Capital and Debt reserves) 2 - 280,300 195,210 254,862 249,204 269,907 302,352 235,794 283,613 319,263 286,363 238,572 Total Sources of Funds $ 28,950,510 $ 29,327,761 $ 29,340,628 $ 29,501,095 $ 29,598,757 $ 29,725,908 $ 29,867,930 $ 29,914,389 $ 30,078,979 $ 30,235,466 $ 30,327,780 $ 30,410,205 Uses of Wastewater Funds
Operating Expenses:

Personnel $ 5,391,260 $ 5,296,300 $ 5,504,890 $ 5,670,037 $ 5,840,138 $ 6,015,342 $ 6,195,802 $ 6,381,676 $ 6,573,127 $ 6,770,320 $ 6,973,430 $ 7,182,633 Operating & Materials (Materials, Supplies & Svcs) 4,533,870 4,399,220 4,497,830 4,601,280 4,707,110 4,815,373 4,926,127 5,039,428 5,155,334 5,273,907 5,395,207 5,519,297 Cost Allocation & Interdepartmental Charges 5,218,350 5,549,600 5,958,030 6,115,918 6,277,990 6,444,356 6,615,132 6,790,433 6,970,379 7,155,094 7,344,704 7,539,339 Subtotal: Operating Expenses $ 15,143,480 $ 15,245,120 $ 15,960,750 $ 16,387,235 $ 16,825,237 $ 17,275,071 $ 17,737,061 $ 18,211,537 $ 18,698,840 $ 19,199,322 $ 19,713,341 $ 20,241,269 Other Expenditures:

Existing Debt Service (funded by rates) 3 $ 7,666,240 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 5,788,071 $ 4,599,704 $ 4,523,176 $ 4,443,078 $ 4,349,308 $ 4,251,134 $ 3,865,033 $ 3,426,352 Rate Funded Debt Reserve - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rate-Funded Capital Expenses - 8,288,921 5,583,628 7,124,394 5,630,265 5,961,082 11,565,784 9,516,167 8,849,505 12,702,733 18,092,105 22,261,108 Subtotal: Other Expenditures $ 7,666,240 $ 12,752,661 $ 10,047,368 $ 11,588,133 $ 11,418,336 $ 10,560,786 $ 16,088,960 $ 13,959,245 $ 13,198,813 $ 16,953,867 $ 21,957,138 $ 25,687,460 Total Uses of Wastewater Funds $ 22,809,720 $ 27,997,781 $ 26,008,118 $ 27,975,368 $ 28,243,573 $ 27,835,857 $ 33,826,021 $ 32,170,782 $ 31,897,653 $ 36,153,189 $ 41,670,479 $ 45,928,729 plus: Revenue from Rate Increases - 581,133 2,379,013 3,652,934 4,986,799 6,211,308 7,487,698 8,818,417 10,399,363 12,056,148 14,214,387 16,498,746 Annual Surplus/(Deficit) $ 6,140,790 $ 1,911,114 $ 5,711,523 $ 5,178,662 $ 6,341,984 $ 8,101,359 $ 3,529,607 $ 6,562,025 $ 8,580,689 $ 6,138,425 $ 2,871,687 $ 980,222 Net Revenue Req't. (Total Uses less Non-Rate Revenue) $ 22,820,760 $ 27,726,672 $ 25,822,061 $ 27,729,577 $ 28,003,356 $ 27,574,854 $ 33,532,490 $ 31,943,725 $ 31,622,695 $ 35,842,499 $ 41,392,610 $ 45,698,576 Total Rate Revenue After Rate Increases $ 28,961,550 $ 29,637,786 $ 31,533,584 $ 32,908,239 $ 34,345,340 $ 35,676,214 $ 37,062,096 $ 38,505,750 $ 40,203,384 $ 41,980,925 $ 44,264,298 $ 46,678,798 Projected Annual Rate Increase 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 4.0% 4.0% 5.0% 5.0% Cumulative Increase from Annual Rate Increases 0.00% 4.00% 8.16% 12.49% 16.99% 21.08% 25.32% 29.70% 34.89% 40.29% 47.30% 54.67% Coverage After Rate Increase 1.80 1.43 2.28 2.16 2.10 2.76 1.78 2.48 2.97 2.44 1.74 1.29 Coverage After Rate Increase (Excluding Rate Funded Capital) 1.80 3.29 3.53 3.76 3.07 4.06 4.34 4.62 5.01 5.43 6.42 7.78

1. Revenue for FY 2018/19 is per the City's Proforma (Source file: WW proforma for Budget 2019-21 5 9 2019.xls ) and expenses are per the City's Budget (Source file: REDDING_doc20190617100115 (Sewer).pdf ).

2. Refers to the City's budget for interest earnings in FY 2018/19. For all future years, interest earnings are calculated here based on the City's Pooled Cash Interest Rate. Source file: REDDING_ Pooled Cash Interest Rate Dec 2018.xlsx .

3. Debt service that cannot be fully paid through the Impact Fee Reserve Fund has been added to Debt Service to be funded by rates.

RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 1 Projected
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 54
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix B, cont.

TABLE 2 : RESERVE FUND SUMMARY
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Total Beginning Cash 1 $26,311,059
Wastewater O&M Reserve Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance 2 $17,163,681 $ 3,821,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,107,000 $ 4,217,000 $ 4,329,000 $ 4,445,000 $ 4,564,000 $ 4,686,000 $ 4,812,000 $ 4,941,000 $ 5,073,000 Plus: Net Cash Flow (After Rate Increases) 6,140,790 1,911,114 5,711,523 5,178,662 6,341,984 8,101,359 3,529,607 6,562,025 8,580,689 6,138,425 2,871,687 980,222 Plus: Transfer of Debt Reserve Surplus - - - - - - - - - - - - Plus: Expected Savings @ 1.5% Pers & O&M 3
148,877 145,433 150,041 154,070 158,209 162,461 166,829 171,317 175,927 180,663 185,530 190,529 Plus: Expected Savings @ 3% Capital 3 292,817 476,805 228,239 232,949 232,347 344,771 554,764 377,355 442,463 637,217 713,297 741,939 Less: Transfer to Rolling Stock (350,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (309,300) Less: Transfer to Debt Reserve - - - - - - - - - - - -
Less: Transfers Out to the Capital Reserve (19,575,166) (2,054,352) (5,682,803) (5,155,680) (6,320,539) (8,192,591) (3,832,200) (6,688,697) (8,773,078) (6,527,305) (3,338,514) (1,467,390) Ending O&M Reserve Balance $ 3,821,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,107,000 $ 4,217,000 $ 4,329,000 $ 4,445,000 $ 4,564,000 $ 4,686,000 $ 4,812,000 $ 4,941,000 $ 5,073,000 $ 5,209,000 Target Ending Balance (90 days of O&M) $ 3,786,000 $ 3,821,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,107,000 $ 4,217,000 $ 4,329,000 $ 4,445,000 $ 4,564,000 $ 4,686,000 $ 4,812,000 $ 4,941,000 $ 5,073,000 Wastewater Capital R&R Reserve Fund (Rates)
Beginning Reserve Balance $ - $ 9,814,587 $ 4,264,352 $ 7,922,803 $ 7,455,680 $ 8,650,539 $ 10,582,591 $ 6,262,200 $ 9,158,697 $ 11,283,078 $ 9,077,305 $ 5,928,514 Plus: Grant Revenue - - - - - - - - - - - -
Plus: Transfer of Operating Reserve Surplus 19,575,166 2,054,352 5,682,803 5,155,680 6,320,539 8,192,591 3,832,200 6,688,697 8,773,078 6,527,305 3,338,514 1,467,390 Less: Capital Projects Funded (9,760,578) (7,604,587) (2,024,352) (5,622,803) (5,125,680) (6,260,539) (8,152,591) (3,792,200) (6,648,697) (8,733,078) (6,487,305) (3,298,514) Ending Capital Repair & Replacement Fund Balance $ 9,814,587 $ 4,264,352 $ 7,922,803 $ 7,455,680 $ 8,650,539 $ 10,582,591 $ 6,262,200 $ 9,158,697 $ 11,283,078 $ 9,077,305 $ 5,928,514 $ 4,097,390 Target Ending Balance (8 % of O&M plus $1 Million Capital) 4 $ 2,240,000 $ 2,210,000 $ 2,240,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 2,330,000 $ 2,390,000 $ 2,430,000 $ 2,470,000 $ 2,510,000 $ 2,550,000 $ 2,590,000 $ 2,630,000 Rolling Stock Reserve Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance 1 $ 394,880 $ 466,136 $ 659,520 $ 556,718 $ 515,938 $ 477,361 $ 423,923 $ 697,389 $ 984,687 $ 1,300,287 $ 1,326,386 $ 1,647,398 Plus: Interest Earnings 6 6,256 7,384 10,448 8,819 8,173 7,562 6,716 11,048 15,599 20,599 21,012 26,098 Plus: Transfer In from Operations $ 350,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 309,300 Plus: Sale of Rolling Stock (5% of Expenses) $ 15,000 $ 6,000 $ 21,750 $ 18,400 $ 18,250 $ 19,000 $ 1,750 $ 1,250 $ - $ 15,500 $ - $ - Less: Rolling Stock Expenses $ (300,000) $ (120,000) $ (435,000) $ (368,000) $ (365,000) $ (380,000) $ (35,000) $ (25,000) $ - $ (310,000) $ - $ - Ending Rolling Stock Fund Balance $ 466,136 $ 659,520 $ 556,718 $ 515,938 $ 477,361 $ 423,923 $ 697,389 $ 984,687 $ 1,300,287 $ 1,326,386 $ 1,647,398 $ 1,982,796 Target Ending Balance (Avg. of '17/18 - '23/24 R.S. Expenses) $ 350,000 $ 361,000 $ 372,000 $ 384,000 $ 396,000 $ 408,000 $ 421,000 $ 434,000 $ 447,000 $ 461,000 $ 475,000 $ 490,000 Ending Balance - All Reserves $ 14,101,723 $ 8,923,872 $ 12,586,521 $ 12,188,618 $ 13,456,900 $ 15,451,515 $ 11,523,589 $ 14,829,384 $ 17,395,365 $ 15,344,691 $ 12,648,912 $ 11,289,186 Recommended Target Ending Balance - All Reserves $ 6,376,000 $ 6,392,000 $ 6,612,000 $ 6,791,000 $ 6,943,000 $ 7,127,000 $ 7,296,000 $ 7,468,000 $ 7,643,000 $ 7,823,000 $ 8,006,000 $ 8,193,000 Ending Surplus/(Deficit) Compared to Reserve Targets $ 7,725,723 $ 2,531,872 $ 5,974,521 $ 5,397,618 $ 6,513,900 $ 8,324,515 $ 4,227,589 $ 7,361,384 $ 9,752,365 $ 7,521,691 $ 4,642,912 $ 3,096,186 Days Cash on Hand 226 117 177 160 174 203 125 169 200 155 111 90

SUMMARY OF RESERVE FUND ACTIVITY
Projected
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 55
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix B, cont.

TABLE 3 : RESERVE FUND SUMMARY, cont.

Restricted Reserves
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Beginning Reserve Balance 1 $ 8,752,498 $ 6,962,029 $ 4,562,258 $ 2,539,098 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Plus: Interest Earnings 5 138,656 110,292 72,275 40,224 - - - - - - - - Plus: Impact Fee Revenue 931,890 992,980 1,057,020 1,115,530 1,185,498 1,258,698 1,335,226 1,415,324 1,509,094 1,607,268 1,720,764 1,839,768 Plus: Savings to Capital Expenditures (3%) 10,861 30,718 19,875 190,740 93,125 22,554 37,925 22,573 23,179 6,039 24,830 25,618 Less: Reserve Funding from Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - - - Less: Existing Debt Service (funded by Impact Fees) (2,509,829) (2,509,829) (2,509,829) (2,509,829) (1,185,498) (1,258,698) (1,335,226) (1,415,324) (1,509,094) (1,607,268) (1,720,764) (1,839,768) Less: Use of Reserves for Capital Projects (Future Needs) (362,048) (1,023,931) (662,500) (1,375,763) (93,125) (22,554) (37,925) (22,573) (23,179) (6,039) (24,830) (25,618) Ending Impact Fee Fund Balance $ 6,962,029 $ 4,562,258 $ 2,539,098 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Reserve Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance 1 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 Less: Transfer of Surplus to Operating Reserve - - - - - - - - - - - - Ending Debt Reserve Balance $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 Target Ending Balance $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 $ 4,058,000 Annual Interest Earnings Rate 5 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58%

1. Beginning cash balance for FY 2018/19 is per the City's Proforma. Source file: REDDING_WW Proforma for Budget 2019-21 Updated.xlsx .

2. The total beginning cash balance for the Operating Reserve is calculated as the total amount of unrestricted cash as of June 30, 2018 less the beginning balances of the following funds: Capital R&R, Rolling Stock and Impact Fee Reserves.

3. Expected savings do not represent actual revenue, but rather anticipated savings based on historical differences between budgeted expenses and actual expenses. Expected savings amounts are from the City's proforma. Source file:

REDDING_WW Proforma for Budget 2019-21 Updated.xlsx .

4. Per City Staff recommendation, the target Capital Reserve balance is set to $1M in 2019 dollar values plus 8% O&M expenses annually. Source file: REDDING_WW Proforma for Budget 2019-21 Updated.xlsx , Summary tab.

5. Interest earnings rate is based on the City's Pooled Cash Interest Rate. Source file: December 2018_Int Earning.pdf .

Wastewater Impact Fee Fund
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 56
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix B, cont.
$0 mil.
$2 mil.
$4 mil.
$6 mil.
$8 mil.
$10 mil.
$12 mil.
$14 mil.
$16 mil.
$18 mil.
$20 mil.
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Ending Cash Balance vs. Recommended Reserve Targets
R&R Fund Reserve
Rolling Stock Fund Reserve O&M Fund Reserve
Recommended Target Reserve Balance (O&M & R&R)

4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%

3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

4.0% 4.0%

5.0% 5.0%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Projected Annual Rate Increases
$0 mil.
$5 mil.
$10 mil.
$15 mil.
$20 mil.
$25 mil.
$30 mil.
$35 mil.
$40 mil.
$45 mil.
$50 mil.
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total Obligations Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Wastewater Revenue Under Existing and Proposed Rates Compared to Annual Revenue Requirements by Type Rolling Stock Expenses
Reserve-Funded Capital Expenditure
Rate-Funded Capital Expenditures Debt Service O&M Expenses Revenues under Increased Rates
Revenues under Existing Rates
226
117
177
160
174
203
125
169
200
155
111
90 0
50 100
150
200
250
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Number of Days Cash on Hand Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Number of Days Cash on Hand
Days Cash on Hand
90 Day Operating Reserve
150 Days Cash on Hand Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 57
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix B, cont. $15.89 Mil. $7.61 Mil. $12.75 Mil. $10.76 Mil. $12.22 Mil. $19.72 Mil. $13.31 Mil. $15.5 Mil. $21.44 Mil.$24.58 Mil. $25.56 Mil. $. Mil.
$5. Mil.
$10. Mil.
$15. Mil.
$20. Mil.
$25. Mil.
$30. Mil.
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Annual Rate-Funded CIP Expenditures Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Annual Sewer Capital Expenditures
Fiscal Years 2018/19 - 2029/30 $7.67 Mil. $4.46 Mil. $4.46 Mil. $4.46 Mil. $5.79 Mil. $4.6 Mil. $4.52 Mil. $4.44 Mil. $4.35 Mil. $4.25 Mil. $3.87 Mil. $3.43 Mil. $. Mil.
$1. Mil.
$2. Mil.
$3. Mil.
$4. Mil.
$5. Mil.
$6. Mil.
$7. Mil.
$8. Mil.
$9. Mil.
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Annual Rate-Funded CIP Expenditures Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Annual Sewer Debt Service
Fiscal Years 2018/19 - 2029/30
TABLE 12 : SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL FUNDS `
CAPITAL FUNDING FORECAST Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Grant $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
State Revolving Fund Loan Proceeds (Rates) - - - - - - - - - - - - Revenue Bond - - - - - - - - - - - -
Use of Capital Reserve Funds (Future Needs) 362,048 1,023,931 662,500 1,375,763 93,125 22,554 37,925 22,573 23,179 6,039 24,830 25,618 Use of Capital Reserve Funds (Existing Needs) 9,760,578 7,604,587 2,024,352 5,622,803 5,125,680 6,260,539 8,152,591 3,792,200 6,648,697 8,733,078 6,487,305 3,298,514 Rate Revenue - 8,288,921 5,583,628 7,124,394 5,630,265 5,961,082 11,565,784 9,516,167 8,849,505 12,702,733 18,092,105 22,261,108 Grand Total: Capital Funding Sources $ 10,122,626 $ 16,917,440 $ 8,270,480 $ 14,122,960 $ 10,849,070 $ 12,244,175 $ 19,756,300 $ 13,330,940 $ 15,521,380 $ 21,441,850 $ 24,604,240 $ 25,585,240 Uses of Capital Funds
Total Projects Costs 1 $ 10,122,626 $ 16,917,440 $ 8,270,480 $ 14,122,960 $ 10,849,070 $ 12,244,175 $ 19,756,300 $ 13,330,940 $ 15,521,380 $ 21,441,850 $ 24,604,240 $ 25,585,240 Total Uses of Capital Funds $ 10,122,626 $ 16,917,440 $ 8,270,480 $ 14,122,960 $ 10,849,070 $ 12,244,175 $ 19,756,300 $ 13,330,940 $ 15,521,380 $ 21,441,850 $ 24,604,240 $ 25,585,240 Surplus/(Deficiency of Funding for CIP) 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

1. Project funding details are in source file: REDDING_WW Proforma for Budget 2019-21 Updated.xlsx .

2. Any surplus available will be carried over for use in later years.

Projected
Funding Sources for Projects:

Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 58
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix B, cont.

TABLE 15 : EXISTING DEBT OBLIGATIONS
EXISTING DEBT OBLIGATIONS Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Wastewater Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2002 Series A
Principal Payment $ 1,525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Interest Payment 76,250 - - - - - - - - - - -
Subtotal: Annual Debt Service $ 1,601,250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Service Paid by Rates $ 1,601,250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Service Paid by Impact Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Coverage Requirement (% above annual payment) 1 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Reserve Requirement (total fund balance) 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - California SWRCB Revolving Fund Loans 3
Total Principal Payment $ 6,779,799 $ 5,378,638 $ 5,505,512 $ 5,635,495 $ 5,768,666 $ 4,789,938 $ 4,900,741 $ 5,014,203 $ 5,130,420 $ 5,249,450 $ 5,098,757 $ 4,897,949 Total Interest Payment 1,507,509 1,334,932 1,236,273 1,135,223 1,031,724 925,714 834,964 742,062 646,923 549,503 449,746 350,866 Total Service Charge 287,511 259,999 231,784 202,851 173,179 142,750 122,697 102,138 81,060 59,450 37,294 17,305 Subtotal: Annual Debt Service $ 8,574,819 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,585,797 $ 5,266,120 Debt Service Paid by Rates $ 6,064,990 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,506,672 $ 3,260,521 Debt Service Paid by Impact Fees $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,079,125 $ 2,005,600 Coverage Requirement (% above annual payment) 4 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Reserve Requirement (total fund balance) 5 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 Grand Total: Existing Annual Debt Service $ 10,176,069 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,585,797 $ 5,266,120 Debt Service Allocated to Rates $ 7,666,240 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,716,578 $ 3,506,672 $ 3,260,521 Debt Service Allocated to Impact Fees $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,141,824 $ 2,079,125 $ 2,005,600 Grand Total: Existing Debt Reserve Target 6 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 $ 4,057,969 Debt Service Paid by Rates $ 7,666,240 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 4,463,740 $ 5,788,071 $ 4,599,704 $ 4,523,176 $ 4,443,078 $ 4,349,308 $ 4,251,134 $ 3,865,033 $ 3,426,352 Debt Service Paid by Impact Fees $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 2,509,829 $ 1,185,498 $ 1,258,698 $ 1,335,226 $ 1,415,324 $ 1,509,094 $ 1,607,268 $ 1,720,764 $ 1,839,768 Grand Total: Existing Annual Debt Service $ 10,176,069 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 6,973,569 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,858,402 $ 5,585,797 $ 5,266,120

TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE

1. The debt coverage requirement for this bond issue is 25% above the annual debt service payment plus 100% of any policy costs due to the insurer. For purposes of this analysis, NBS assumes that nothing is owed to the insurer.

2. There is no reserve requirement for this bond issue per the Official Statement, because there is a surety bond in place of a reserve fund.

3. This schedule includes the payments for the State Water Resources Control Board Revolving Fund Loans for the following Agreement Nos. 00809-550-0, 06803-550-0, 07819-550-0, 07826-550-0, 11809-550-0, 10807-550-0, 11810-550-0, 09824-550-0, 11800-550-0, 10802-550-0, 11849-550-0, and 13836-550-0. The percentage of the annual payment attributable to rates and impact fees varies by debt issue. Source files: R EDDING_WW Proforma for Budget 2019-21 Updated.xlsx and REDDING_Wastewater Debt Service.pdf .

4. NBS assumes that there is no coverage requirement for these debt issues.

5. NBS assumes that there is no reserve requirement for these debt issues.

6. Principal and Interest payments, and reserve requirement are per City Staff estimates provided in the Wastewater proforma files.

Annual Repayment Schedules:

Projected
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 59
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix B, cont.

Revenue Check (Annual, $ per number of Housing Equivalents, exclude revenue generated from volumetric charges):

FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
Single-Family Residential 23,506 $ 15,474,154 $ 16,091,879 $ 16,734,990 $ 17,403,487 $ 18,100,191 Multi-Family Residential 111,929 5,810,377 6,042,277 6,284,197 6,536,138 6,798,099 Commercial, No Food 8,296 5,461,647 5,679,674 5,906,662 6,142,610 6,388,514 Commercial, Food Prep 2,007 2,642,905 2,748,650 2,858,490 2,972,906 3,091,900 Industrial 2197 129,386 134,551 139,929 145,518 151,344 Other 2403 265,184 275,771 286,792 298,248 310,188
Unknown 2 2 1,317 1,369 1,424 1,481 1,540
Total 46,340 $ 29,784,970 $ 30,974,171 $ 32,212,483 $ 33,500,388 $ 34,841,774 Projected Rate Revenue - Fin. Plan $ 29,637,786 $ 31,533,584 $ 32,908,239 $ 34,345,340

1. Multi-Family Residential billed by number of accounts, not housing equivalent units.

2. Billed at the Standard Commercial ($/# HE)
Estimated Proposed Rates
Revenue at
Current Rates
Number of
Housing
Equivalents
Estimated Annual Revenue
by Customer Class
(Billed Monthly)
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 60
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding AppendixC– Additional Solid Waste Rate Study Tables
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Sources of Solid Waste Funds
Rate Revenue Under Prevailing Rates $ 16,905,190 $ 16,960,702 $ 17,017,858 $ 17,076,658 $ 17,136,918 $ 17,199,004 $ 17,262,917 $ 17,328,838 $ 17,396,950 $ 17,467,436 $ 17,540,479 $ 17,616,443 Fee Revenue 2,059,130 2,127,868 2,199,090 2,272,889 2,349,337 2,452,163 2,559,726 2,672,281 2,790,096 2,885,442 2,984,433 3,087,279 Other Revenue 1,547,160 1,552,180 1,557,348 1,562,664 1,568,113 1,573,727 1,579,506 1,585,467 1,591,626 1,597,999 1,604,604 1,611,473 Interest Earnings (in O&M, Capital and Debt Reserves) 2 161,740 122,017 90,354 83,582 84,765 81,585 87,560 95,749 117,222 146,783 153,600 126,528 Total Sources of Funds $ 20,673,220 $ 20,762,768 $ 20,864,650 $ 20,995,793 $ 21,139,134 $ 21,306,479 $ 21,489,709 $ 21,682,335 $ 21,895,894 $ 22,097,661 $ 22,283,117 $ 22,441,724 Uses of Solid Waste Funds
Operating Expenses:

Solid Waste Administration $ 2,532,420 $ 2,896,710 $ 2,779,980 $ 2,868,580 $ 2,960,200 $ 3,055,010 $ 3,153,140 $ 3,254,560 $ 3,359,530 $ 3,468,100 $ 3,580,460 $ 3,696,640 Residential Collection Expenses 3,303,070 3,324,720 3,337,790 3,436,180 3,537,400 3,641,520 3,748,640 3,858,830 3,972,170 4,088,790 4,208,780 4,332,400 Commercial Collection Expenses 3,590,250 3,485,730 3,489,320 3,591,910 3,697,350 3,805,730 3,917,120 4,031,670 4,149,410 4,270,450 4,394,890 4,523,010 Roll-Off Collection Expenses 1,076,000 1,104,290 1,134,450 1,168,510 1,203,520 1,239,510 1,276,540 1,314,590 1,353,740 1,394,010 1,435,420 1,478,090 Resource Recovery Expenses 5,274,040 5,132,830 5,283,640 5,440,740 5,598,490 5,763,080 5,932,640 6,107,270 6,287,170 6,472,540 6,663,470 6,860,460 Transfer Station Expenses 2,681,350 2,822,780 2,812,560 2,898,000 2,985,970 3,076,510 3,169,750 3,265,770 3,364,670 3,466,510 3,571,370 3,679,480 Hazardous Household Waste Expenses 453,920 522,890 537,770 554,640 572,060 589,990 608,530 627,650 647,370 667,760 688,800 710,540 Street Sweeping Expenses 1,225,600 1,222,860 1,234,960 1,250,550 1,266,650 1,283,260 1,300,440 1,318,140 1,336,440 1,355,320 1,374,840 1,394,980 Subtotal: Operating Expenses $ 20,136,650 $ 20,512,810 $ 20,610,470 $ 21,209,110 $ 21,821,640 $ 22,454,610 $ 23,106,800 $ 23,778,480 $ 24,470,500 $ 25,183,480 $ 25,918,030 $ 26,675,600 Other Expenditures:

Rate-Funded Capital Expenses 3 51,000 1,035,000 243,450 - - - - - - - 1,893,000 5,723,521 Subtotal: Other Expenditures $ 51,000 $ 1,035,000 $ 243,450 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,893,000 $ 5,723,521 Total Uses of Solid Waste Funds $ 20,187,650 $ 21,547,810 $ 20,853,920 $ 21,209,110 $ 21,821,640 $ 22,454,610 $ 23,106,800 $ 23,778,480 $ 24,470,500 $ 25,183,480 $ 27,811,030 $ 32,399,121 plus: Revenue from Rate Increases - 286,329 1,168,333 1,788,027 2,432,755 3,325,278 4,264,046 5,251,587 6,290,599 7,116,156 7,976,038 8,872,009 Annual Surplus/(Deficit) $ 485,570 $ (498,714) $ 1,179,063 $ 1,574,710 $ 1,750,248 $ 2,177,147 $ 2,646,954 $ 3,155,441 $ 3,715,993 $ 4,030,336 $ 2,448,124 $ (1,085,388) Net Revenue Req't. (Total Uses less Non-Rate Revenue) $ 16,419,620 $ 17,745,745 $ 17,007,128 $ 17,289,975 $ 17,819,424 $ 18,347,135 $ 18,880,008 $ 19,424,983 $ 19,971,556 $ 20,553,256 $ 23,068,392 $ 27,573,841 Total Rate Revenue After Rate Increases $ 16,905,190 $ 17,247,031 $ 18,186,191 $ 18,864,685 $ 19,569,673 $ 20,524,282 $ 21,526,963 $ 22,580,424 $ 23,687,549 $ 24,583,592 $ 25,516,517 $ 26,488,453 Projected Annual Rate Increase 4 0.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Cumulative Increase from Annual Rate Increases 0.00% 3.00% 6.09% 9.27% 12.55% 17.05% 21.74% 26.60% 31.67% 35.62% 39.69% 43.88%

1. Revenues and expenses for FY 2018/19 through FY 2028/29 are per source file: REDDING_SW 10 Year Plan FY 19-21 061819.xlsx .

2. Beginning in FY 2019/20, interest earnings are calculated in this exhibit based on projected pooled cash earnings shown in the Reserve Fund Summary table.

3. These are the only capital expenditures funded directly with rate revenue. Rolling stock expenditures are shown in the Rolling Stock Reserve Fund.

4. Rate increases apply to both solid waste rates and fees, and are selected in the Financial Plan Alternatives.

RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 1 Projected
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 61
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

TABLE 2 : RESERVE FUND SUMMARY
Budget
FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Total Beginning Cash 1 $ 9,754,926
Solid Waste O&M Reserve Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance 2 $ 8,373,064 $ 6,833,634 $ 4,534,921 $ 3,813,984 $ 3,388,694 $ 3,138,942 $ 3,016,089 $ 3,363,044 $ 3,818,485 $ 4,834,478 $ 6,264,814 $ 6,612,939 Plus: Net Cash Flow (After Rate Increases) 485,570 (498,714) 1,179,063 1,574,710 1,750,248 2,177,147 2,646,954 3,155,441 3,715,993 4,030,336 2,448,124 (1,085,388) Less: Transfer to Rolling Stock 3
(1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) Net: Transfers To the Capital Reserve 4
(525,000) (300,000) (300,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) (900,000) (900,000) (800,000) (300,000) (300,000) Ending O&M Reserve Balance $ 6,833,634 $ 4,534,921 $ 3,813,984 $ 3,388,694 $ 3,138,942 $ 3,016,089 $ 3,363,044 $ 3,818,485 $ 4,834,478 $ 6,264,814 $ 6,612,939 $ 3,427,551 Target Ending Balance (90 Days of Operating Expenses) 5 $ 3,320,000 $ 3,447,000 $ 3,474,000 $ 3,575,000 $ 3,677,000 $ 3,783,000 $ 3,893,000 $ 4,006,000 $ 4,123,000 $ 4,243,000 $ 4,367,000 $ 4,495,000 Solid Waste Capital R&R Reserve Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance 6 $ 343,550 $ 868,550 $ 1,168,550 $ 1,462,000 $ 1,962,000 $ 2,011,000 $ 2,511,000 $ 2,681,000 $ 3,581,000 $ 4,431,000 $ 3,431,000 $ 1,374,000 Plus: Net Debt Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net: Transfer From/(To) the Operating Reserve 525,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 900,000 900,000 800,000 300,000 300,000 Less: Use of Reserves for Capital Projects and Equipment - - (6,550) - (451,000) - (330,000) - (50,000) (1,800,000) (2,357,000) (3,000) Ending Repair & Replacement Balance $ 868,550 $ 1,168,550 $ 1,462,000 $ 1,962,000 $ 2,011,000 $ 2,511,000 $ 2,681,000 $ 3,581,000 $ 4,431,000 $ 3,431,000 $ 1,374,000 $ 1,671,000 Target Ending Balance (7% of Net Assets) 7 $ 1,252,000 $ 1,232,000 $ 1,162,000 $ 1,081,000 $ 1,034,000 $ 962,000 $ 916,000 $ 852,000 $ 796,000 $ 857,000 $ 1,074,000 $ 1,371,000 Days Cash on Hand 158 127 120 116 104 101 112 132 151 153 125 82 Ending vs. Target - Annual Surplus/(Deficit) $ 2,632,265 $ 952,406 $ 506,721 $ 576,967 $ 633 $ (353,231) $ 429,383 $ 1,910,837 $ 3,374,965 $ 3,624,301 $ 1,574,425 $ (1,738,963) Ending Balance - O&M and R&R Reserves $ 7,702,184 $ 5,703,471 $ 5,275,984 $ 5,350,694 $ 5,149,942 $ 5,527,089 $ 6,044,044 $ 7,399,485 $ 9,265,478 $ 9,695,814 $ 7,986,939 $ 5,098,551 Recom. Target Ending Balance - O&M and R&R Reserves $ 4,572,000 $ 4,679,000 $ 4,636,000 $ 4,656,000 $ 4,711,000 $ 4,745,000 $ 4,809,000 $ 4,858,000 $ 4,919,000 $ 5,100,000 $ 5,441,000 $ 5,866,000 Solid Waste Rolling Stock Fund
Beginning Reserve Balance 8 $ 1,038,312 $ 1,002,081 $ 1,427,935 $ 1,466,737 $ 1,382,273 $ 1,061,690 $ 664,680 $ 994,339 $ 1,169,352 $ 828,486 $ 828,486 $ 828,486 Plus: Transfers in from Operating Reserve 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 Plus: Interest 16,449 15,875 22,621 23,236 21,898 16,819 10,530 15,752 18,525 13,125 13,125 13,125 Less: Use of Reserves for Rolling Stock (1,552,680) (1,090,020) (1,583,820) (1,607,700) (1,842,480) (2,213,830) (1,480,870) (1,640,740) (2,159,390) (1,813,125) (1,813,125) (1,813,125) Ending Rolling Stock Fund Balance $ 1,002,081 $ 1,427,935 $ 1,466,737 $ 1,382,273 $ 1,061,690 $ 664,680 $ 994,339 $ 1,169,352 $ 828,486 $ 828,486 $ 828,486 $ 828,486 Target Ending Balance 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 Ending Balance - All Reserves $ 8,704,265 $ 7,131,406 $ 6,742,721 $ 6,732,967 $ 6,211,633 $ 6,191,769 $ 7,038,383 $ 8,568,837 $ 10,093,965 $ 10,524,301 $ 8,815,425 $ 5,927,037 Recom. Target Ending Balance - w/ Rolling Stock $ 6,072,000 $ 6,179,000 $ 6,236,000 $ 6,156,000 $ 6,211,000 $ 6,545,000 $ 6,609,000 $ 6,658,000 $ 6,719,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 7,241,000 $ 7,666,000 Annual Interest Earnings Rate 9 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58%

1. Total beginning cash for FY 2018/19 is per City staff estimates. Source file: REDDING_SW 10 Year Plan FY 19-21.xlsx .

2. Beginning O&M Reserve Balance for FY 2018/19 is net of total beginning cash allocated to reserved funds.

3. Transfer from the O&M Reserve Fund to Rolling Stock is per City staff estimates. Source file: R EDDING_SW 10 Year Plan FY 19-21.xlsx .

4. Transfers to the Capital R&R Reserve Fund are per the City's 10-Year Financial Plan. NBS assumes that the City will be transferring a minimum of $300K per year in order to meet the reserve target for future years beyond FY 2028/29.

5. The O&M Reserve Fund is based on 90-days of operating costs less utility and administration expenses.

6. The beginning Capital R&R Reserve Fund balance is per City Staff estimates. Source file: REDDING_SW 10 Year Plan FY 19-21.xlsx , CAP PLAN tab.

7. The City maintains 7% of net assets for the Capital R&R Reserve Fund based on an average 15-year expected life of assets.

8. The beginning reserve balance for the Rolling Stock Fund is per City Staff estimates. Source file: REDDING_SW 10 Year Plan FY 19-21.xlsx , Rolling Stock tab.

9. The interest earning rate is based on the City's Pooled Cash Interest Rate. Source file: December 2018_Int Earning.pdf .

SUMMARY OF RESERVE FUND ACTIVITY
Alternative: Recommended Increases
Projected
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 62
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.
$0 mil.
$5 mil.
$10 mil.
$15 mil.
$20 mil.
$25 mil.
$30 mil.
$35 mil.
$40 mil.
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total Obligations Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Solid Waste Revenue Requirements vs. Revenue Under Existing and Recommended Rate Increases Reserve-Funded Capital Expenditures
Rolling Stock Purchases
Rate-Funded Capital Expenditures Debt Service O&M Expenses Revenues under Existing Rates
Revenues under Increased Rates
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$10
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Ending Reserves ($ mil.) Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Ending Cash Balance vs. Recommended Reserve Targets
Ending Cash Balance Operating & Capital Reserves
Recommended Target Reserve Balance Operating & Capital Reserves

3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%

3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Projected Solid Waste Rate Increases
158
127 120 116
104 101 112
132
151 153
125
82 0
20 40
60 80
100
120
140
160
180
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Number of Days Cash on Hand Fiscal Year Ending June 30
Solid Waste Utility - Number of Days Cash on Hand
Days Cash on Hand
90 Day Operating Reserve Target
150-Days Cash on Hand
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 63
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

TABLE 14 : SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL FUNDS
CAPITAL FUNDING FORECAST Actuals Budget
FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 FY 2027/28 FY 2028/29 FY 2029/30 Grant $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Revolving Fund Loan - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revenue Bond - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Surplus Capital Reserve 501,250 - - 6,550 - 451,000 - 330,000 - 50,000 1,800,000 2,357,000 3,000 Rate Revenue - 51,000 1,035,000 243,450 - - - - - - - 1,893,000 5,723,521 Grand Total: Capital Funding Sources $ 501,250 $ 51,000 $ 1,035,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 451,000 $ - $ 330,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,726,521 Uses of Capital Funds:

Effective Annual Funding of Capital Expenditures $ 501,250 $ 51,000 $ 1,035,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 451,000 $ - $ 330,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,726,521 Capital Funding Surplus (Deficiency) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Funding Sources:

Projected
TABLE 26 : ADJUSTMENT TO CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENSES
Adjustment for Current Rate Level: Total Residential Commercial Roll-Off Street Sweeping
FY 2019/20 Target Rate Rev. After Rate Increases 1
$ 17,469,524
Current Level of Rate Revenue 16,960,702
FY 2019/20 Projected Rate Increase 3.0%
Adjusted Net Revenue Req'ts $ 17,469,524 $ 9,049,095 $ 6,843,141 $ 2,057,087 $ 134,993 Percent of Revenue 52% 39% 12% 1%

1. This was adjusted to reflect the full rate increase vs. revenue from delayed effective date of Jan. 1, 2020 for rate increases.

Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 64
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Residential Containers - Revenue Check of Current and Proposed Rates '19/20 Budget Proposed Rates
2018 Bill
Amount/Mo.

Estimated
Annual Rev.

Est. Annual
Rev. (w/o)
rate Incr.)
Estimated
Annual
Revenue
Residential:

Residential Min Charge 122 $ 2,378 $ 28,540 $ -
Residential 45-Gallon 938 19,841 238,094 285,341
Residential 64-Gallon 3,870 86,590 1,039,080 1,271,068
Residential 96-Gallon 21,823 522,197 6,266,360 7,221,579 2nd Green Waste Cart 5,077 19,870 238,445 261,321
Subtotal 31,830 $ 650,877 $ 7,810,518 $ 8,746,848
Residential NCC 730 $ 2,675 $ 2,675 $ 2,675
Commercial:

Commercial Min Charge 113 $ 2,360 $ 28,321
Commercial 45-Gallon 8 142 1,710
Commercial 64-Gallon 239 5,440 65,275
Commercial 96-Gallon 705 17,014 204,163
Subtotal 1,065 $ 24,956 $ 299,469 $ 328,244
Commercial NCC 104 $ 386 $ 4,633.44
Total 32,895 $ 675,832 $ 8,109,987 $ 9,075,093 $ 9,041,985 Data is from the City's Waste Wheeler Revenue Report for June 2018 dated 07/03/2018.

Customer Class
Current Rates
2018 Charge
Quantity
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 65
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
Annual Rate increases as shown in Financial Plan: 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Residential Wheeled Cart Monthly Rate 1
45-Gal Container $22.36 $23.16 $23.85 $24.57 $25.30
64-Gal Container $23.37 $24.20 $24.93 $25.68 $26.45
96-Gal Container $25.01 $25.90 $26.68 $27.48 $28.30
Additional Green Waste Container $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 Landfill Monitoring
Automated Cart Special Collection Rate (per cart)
45-gallon
Same Day (50% of monthly fee) $11.18 $11.58 $11.93 $12.28 $12.65 Not Same Day (65% of monthly fee) $14.53 $15.05 $15.50 $15.97 $16.45 64-gallon
Same Day (50% of monthly fee) $11.69 $12.10 $12.46 $12.84 $13.22 Not Same Day (65% of monthly fee) $15.19 $15.73 $16.20 $16.69 $17.19 96-gallon
Same Day (50% of monthly fee) $12.51 $12.95 $13.34 $13.74 $14.15 Not Same Day (65% of monthly fee) $16.26 $16.84 $17.34 $17.86 $18.40

1. Residential Service includes trash, recycling, and green waste containers.

SOLID WASTE RATE SCHEDULE Current Rates
('18/19)
Proposed Rates
($0.22/month - no increases)
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 66
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Commercial Service Charges
Calculation of Annual Container Costs ($/Year)
1 CY 1.5 CY 2 CY 3 CY 4 CY 6 CY 8 CY Total
Adjusted Container Cost ($/year) by Size 1: $9.41 $14.12 $18.82 $28.24 $37.65 $56.47 $75.30 N.A. $75.30 Adjusted avg. cost Number of containers by size 1 438 534 528 686 305 57 2,549 $30.79 COS Average cost Annual Container Cost Recovery: $8 $6,185 $10,049 $14,906 $25,840 $17,227 $4,275 $78,490 Total Annual Container Cost Recovery: $78,490 2.445
Target Container Cost Recovery: $78,490

1. Calculation is the average cost adjusted for container size in proportion to volume.

Calculation of Annual Lift Costs ($/Lift and $/Year)
1 CY 1.5 CY 2 CY 3 CY 4 CY 6 CY 8 CY Total
Adjusted Lift Cost ($/Lift) by Size: $13.64 $15.01 $16.37 $19.10 $21.83 $27.28 $32.74 N.A. $32.74 Adjusted avg. cost Number of Lift/year by size 44 24,939 31,460 38,554 56,664 32,033 7,050 190,745 $20.80 COS Average cost Annual Lift Cost Recovery: $601 $374,214 $514,980 $736,287 $1,236,721 $873,927 $230,803 $3,967,533 Total Annual Container Cost Recovery: $3,967,533 1.574
Target Container Cost Recovery: $3,967,533
Cost Factors
Adjustment factor (to
generate sufficient
revenue)
Adjustments
Cost Factors Adjustments
Adjustment factor (to
generate sufficient
revenue)
Revenue Check for 2019 Commercial (Scheduled & Unscheduled) Containers:

Unscheduled
Total pickups 1 2 3 4 5 6

2.0 0 $ 1,727 $ 3,438 $ - $ 6,860 $ - $ - $ 12,026

3.0 0 2,350 4,676 - - - - 7,027

4.0 0 11,893 17,744 - 11,797 - - 41,435

6.0 0 16,878 75,520 37,688 - - - 130,087
Total $ 190,574

1.0 0 $ 774 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 774

1.5 0 430,848 89,634 - - - - 520,482

2.0 0 589,093 148,291 15,848 - - - 753,233

3.0 0 576,793 418,003 141,163 21,479 6,706 16,085 1,180,229

4.0 0 762,275 818,787 337,877 58,666 81,400 29,285 2,088,290

6.0 0 358,376 421,026 298,073 158,685 187,133 118,799 1,542,093

8.0 0 70,655 89,417 91,860 88,906 55,503 49,914 446,255 Total $ 6,531,355
Commercial
Containers
Front Load
Compactors
Annual
Revenue
Type Size
Pickups Per Week
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 67
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

1.0 Yard $ 70.07 $ 139.48 $ 208.88 $ 278.29 $ 347.69 $ 417.10 1.0 Yard $ 76.12 $ 151.46 $ 226.80 $ 302.14 $ 377.48 $ 452.82 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 0.95 1.90 2.84 3.78 4.73 5.67 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.04 2.06 3.08 4.11 5.13 6.16 Monthly Charge $ 71.02 $ 141.37 $ 211.72 $ 282.07 $ 352.42 $ 422.77 Monthly Charge $ 77.16 $ 153.52 $ 229.88 $ 306.25 $ 382.61 $ 458.97

1.5 Yard $ 83.69 $ 166.38 $ 249.07 $ 331.76 $ 414.46 $ 497.16 1.5 Yard $ 90.54 $ 179.90 $ 269.26 $ 358.63 $ 447.99 $ 537.35 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.14 2.26 3.39 4.51 5.64 6.76 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.23 2.45 3.66 4.88 6.09 7.31 Monthly Charge $ 84.83 $ 168.64 $ 252.46 $ 336.27 $ 420.10 $ 503.92 Monthly Charge $ 91.77 $ 182.35 $ 272.93 $ 363.50 $ 454.08 $ 544.66

2.0 Yard $ 97.31 $ 193.29 $ 289.27 $ 385.25 $ 481.23 $ 577.20 2.0 Yard $ 104.95 $ 208.34 $ 311.73 $ 415.11 $ 518.50 $ 621.88 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.32 2.63 3.93 5.24 6.54 7.85 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.43 2.83 4.24 5.65 7.05 8.46 Monthly Charge $ 98.63 $ 195.91 $ 293.21 $ 390.49 $ 487.77 $ 585.05 Monthly Charge $ 106.38 $ 211.17 $ 315.97 $ 420.76 $ 525.55 $ 630.34

3.0 Yard $ 124.55 $ 247.11 $ 369.65 $ 492.20 $ 614.76 $ 737.31 3.0 Yard $ 133.79 $ 265.22 $ 396.65 $ 528.08 $ 659.52 $ 790.95 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.69 3.36 5.03 6.69 8.36 10.03 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.82 3.61 5.39 7.18 8.97 10.76 Monthly Charge $ 126.24 $ 250.47 $ 374.68 $ 498.90 $ 623.12 $ 747.34 Monthly Charge $ 135.61 $ 268.83 $ 402.05 $ 535.27 $ 668.49 $ 801.71

4.0 Yard $ 151.78 $ 300.91 $ 450.04 $ 599.17 $ 748.29 $ 897.42 4.0 Yard $ 162.62 $ 322.10 $ 481.58 $ 641.06 $ 800.54 $ 960.02 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.06 4.09 6.12 8.15 10.18 12.20 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.21 4.38 6.55 8.72 10.89 13.06 Monthly Charge $ 153.85 $ 305.01 $ 456.16 $ 607.32 $ 758.46 $ 909.62 Monthly Charge $ 164.83 $ 326.48 $ 488.13 $ 649.78 $ 811.42 $ 973.07

6.0 Yard $ 206.27 $ 408.54 $ 610.81 $ 813.08 $ 1,015.36 $ 1,217.63 6.0 Yard $ 220.28 $ 435.85 $ 651.43 $ 867.00 $ 1,082.58 $ 1,298.15 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.81 5.56 8.31 11.06 13.81 16.56 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.00 5.93 8.86 11.79 14.72 17.65 Monthly Charge $ 209.07 $ 414.10 $ 619.12 $ 824.14 $ 1,029.17 $ 1,234.19 Monthly Charge $ 223.28 $ 441.78 $ 660.29 $ 878.79 $ 1,097.30 $ 1,315.81

8.0 Yard $ 260.75 $ 516.16 $ 771.58 $ 1,027.00 $ 1,282.42 $ 1,537.84 8.0 Yard $ 277.94 $ 549.61 $ 821.28 $ 1,092.95 $ 1,364.62 $ 1,636.29 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.55 7.02 10.49 13.97 17.44 20.91 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.78 7.47 11.17 14.86 18.56 22.25 Monthly Charge $ 264.29 $ 523.18 $ 782.07 $ 1,040.97 $ 1,299.86 $ 1,558.75 Monthly Charge $ 281.72 $ 557.09 $ 832.45 $ 1,107.81 $ 1,383.18 $ 1,658.54 Special Collection Fees :
25% above weekly rate (monthly
rate/4.33)
Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total
Special Collection Fees :
25% above weekly rate (monthly
rate/4.33)
Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

1.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 20.23 0.28 $ 20.51 1.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 21.96 0.30 $ 22.27

1.5 Yard Non-compacted $ 24.16 0.33 $ 24.49 1.5 Yard Non-compacted $ 26.12 0.36 $ 26.47

2.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 28.09 0.38 $ 28.47 2.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 30.28 0.41 $ 30.69

3.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 35.95 0.49 $ 36.44 3.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 38.59 0.52 $ 39.12

4.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 43.82 0.60 $ 44.41 4.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 46.91 0.64 $ 47.55

6.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 59.55 0.81 $ 60.36 6.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 63.54 0.86 $ 64.41

8.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 75.27 1.02 $ 76.29 8.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 80.18 1.09 $ 81.26 Landfill Monitoring fee is calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED NEW Commercial Container Rates
Fiscal Year 2019 - 2020
Landfill Monitoring fee is calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Commercial Container Rates
Fiscal Year 2018 - 2019
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 68
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

2.0 Yard $ 160.77 $ 320.21 $ 479.66 $ 639.10 $ 798.53 $ 957.97 2.0 Yard $ 169.85 $ 338.13 $ 506.42 $ 674.70 $ 842.98 $ 1,011.26 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.19 4.35 6.52 8.69 10.86 13.03 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.31 4.60 6.89 9.18 11.46 13.75 Monthly Charge $ 162.96 $ 324.57 $ 486.18 $ 647.79 $ 809.39 $ 971.00 Monthly Charge $ 172.16 $ 342.73 $ 513.30 $ 683.87 $ 854.45 $ 1,025.02

3.0 Yard $ 219.74 $ 437.49 $ 655.23 $ 872.98 $ 1,090.71 $ 1,308.46 3.0 Yard $ 231.13 $ 459.91 $ 688.69 $ 917.47 $ 1,146.24 $ 1,375.02 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.99 5.95 8.91 11.87 14.83 17.80 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.14 6.25 9.37 12.48 15.59 18.70 Monthly Charge $ 222.73 $ 443.44 $ 664.14 $ 884.85 $ 1,105.55 $ 1,326.25 Monthly Charge $ 234.27 $ 466.16 $ 698.05 $ 929.94 $ 1,161.83 $ 1,393.72

4.0 Yard $ 278.71 $ 554.76 $ 830.81 $ 1,106.86 $ 1,382.90 $ 1,658.95 4.0 Yard $ 292.41 $ 581.68 $ 870.96 $ 1,160.23 $ 1,449.51 $ 1,738.78 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.79 7.54 11.30 15.05 18.81 22.56 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.98 7.91 11.85 15.78 19.71 23.65 Monthly Charge $ 282.50 $ 562.31 $ 842.11 $ 1,121.91 $ 1,401.71 $ 1,681.51 Monthly Charge $ 296.39 $ 589.60 $ 882.80 $ 1,176.01 $ 1,469.22 $ 1,762.43

5.0 Yard* $ 337.68 $ 672.04 $ 1,006.39 $ 1,340.73 $ 1,675.09 $ 2,009.44 5.0 Yard* $ 353.69 $ 703.46 $ 1,053.23 $ 1,403.00 $ 1,752.77 $ 2,102.54 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.59 9.14 13.69 18.23 22.78 27.33 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.81 9.57 14.32 19.08 23.84 28.59 Monthly Charge $ 342.28 $ 681.18 $ 1,020.08 $ 1,358.97 $ 1,697.87 $ 2,036.77 Monthly Charge $ 358.50 $ 713.03 $ 1,067.55 $ 1,422.08 $ 1,776.60 $ 2,131.13

6.0 Yard $ 396.65 $ 789.31 $ 1,181.97 $ 1,574.61 $ 1,967.27 $ 2,359.93 6.0 Yard $ 414.97 $ 825.24 $ 1,235.50 $ 1,645.76 $ 2,056.03 $ 2,466.29 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.39 10.73 16.07 21.41 26.75 32.10 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.64 11.22 16.80 22.38 27.96 33.54 Monthly Charge $ 402.05 $ 800.04 $ 1,198.04 $ 1,596.03 $ 1,994.03 $ 2,392.02 Monthly Charge $ 420.61 $ 836.46 $ 1,252.30 $ 1,668.15 $ 2,083.99 $ 2,499.83

8.0 Yard* $ 528.87 $ 1,023.86 $ 1,533.12 $ 2,042.38 $ 2,551.64 $ 3,060.91 8.0 Yard* $ 537.53 $ 1,068.79 $ 1,600.04 $ 2,131.30 $ 2,662.55 $ 3,193.81 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.19 13.92 20.85 27.78 34.70 41.63 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.31 14.54 21.76 28.99 36.21 43.44 Monthly Charge $ 536.06 $ 1,037.78 $ 1,553.97 $ 2,070.15 $ 2,586.35 $ 3,102.54 Monthly Charge $ 544.84 $ 1,083.32 $ 1,621.80 $ 2,160.28 $ 2,698.76 $ 3,237.24 Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

2.0 Yard Compactor $ 37.13 0.50 $ 37.64 2.0 Yard Compactor $ 49.00 0.67 $ 49.66

3.0 Yard Compactor $ 50.75 0.69 $ 51.44 3.0 Yard Compactor $ 66.67 0.91 $ 67.58

4.0 Yard Compactor $ 64.37 0.88 $ 65.24 4.0 Yard Compactor $ 84.35 1.15 $ 85.50

5.0 Yard Compactor $ 77.99 1.06 $ 79.05 5.0 Yard Compactor $ 102.03 1.39 $ 103.41

6.0 Yard Compactor $ 91.61 1.25 $ 92.85 6.0 Yard Compactor $ 119.70 1.63 $ 121.33

7.0 Yard Compactor $ 103.00 1.40 $ 104.40 7.0 Yard Compactor $ 137.38 1.87 $ 139.25

8.0 Yard Compactor $ 122.14 1.66 $ 123.80 8.0 Yard Compactor $ 155.06 2.11 $ 157.17 Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Front Load Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2018 - 2019
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33)

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Front Load Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2019 - 2020
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33) Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 69
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

1.0 Yard $ 78.41 $ 156.01 $ 233.60 $ 311.20 $ 388.80 $ 466.40 1.0 Yard $ 80.76 $ 160.69 $ 240.61 $ 320.54 $ 400.47 $ 480.39 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.07 2.12 3.18 4.23 5.29 6.34 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.10 2.19 3.27 4.36 5.45 6.53 Monthly Charge $ 79.47 $ 158.13 $ 236.78 $ 315.44 $ 394.09 $ 472.74 Monthly Charge $ 81.86 $ 162.87 $ 243.88 $ 324.90 $ 405.91 $ 486.93

1.5 Yard $ 93.26 $ 185.30 $ 277.34 $ 369.38 $ 461.43 $ 553.47 1.5 Yard $ 96.05 $ 190.86 $ 285.66 $ 380.47 $ 475.27 $ 570.07 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.27 2.52 3.77 5.02 6.28 7.53 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.31 2.60 3.88 5.17 6.46 7.75 Monthly Charge $ 94.52 $ 187.82 $ 281.11 $ 374.41 $ 467.70 $ 561.00 Monthly Charge $ 97.36 $ 193.45 $ 289.55 $ 385.64 $ 481.73 $ 577.83

2.0 Yard $ 108.10 $ 214.59 $ 321.08 $ 427.57 $ 534.05 $ 640.54 2.0 Yard $ 111.35 $ 221.03 $ 330.71 $ 440.39 $ 550.07 $ 659.76 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.47 2.92 4.37 5.81 7.26 8.71 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.51 3.01 4.50 5.99 7.48 8.97 Monthly Charge $ 109.57 $ 217.51 $ 325.44 $ 433.38 $ 541.32 $ 649.25 Monthly Charge $ 112.86 $ 224.03 $ 335.21 $ 446.38 $ 557.56 $ 668.73

3.0 Yard $ 137.80 $ 273.18 $ 408.55 $ 543.93 $ 679.30 $ 814.68 3.0 Yard $ 141.93 $ 281.37 $ 420.81 $ 560.25 $ 699.68 $ 839.12 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.87 3.72 5.56 7.40 9.24 11.08 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.93 3.83 5.72 7.62 9.52 11.41 Monthly Charge $ 139.67 $ 276.89 $ 414.11 $ 551.32 $ 688.54 $ 825.76 Monthly Charge $ 143.86 $ 285.20 $ 426.53 $ 567.86 $ 709.20 $ 850.53

4.0 Yard $ 167.50 $ 331.76 $ 496.02 $ 660.29 $ 824.55 $ 988.82 4.0 Yard $ 172.52 $ 341.71 $ 510.91 $ 680.10 $ 849.29 $ 1,018.48 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.28 4.51 6.75 8.98 11.21 13.45 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.35 4.65 6.95 9.25 11.55 13.85 Monthly Charge $ 169.77 $ 336.27 $ 502.77 $ 669.27 $ 835.77 $ 1,002.27 Monthly Charge $ 174.87 $ 346.36 $ 517.85 $ 689.35 $ 860.84 $ 1,032.33

6.0 Yard $ 226.89 $ 448.93 $ 670.97 $ 893.01 $ 1,115.05 $ 1,337.10 6.0 Yard $ 233.70 $ 462.40 $ 691.10 $ 919.80 $ 1,148.51 $ 1,377.21 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.09 6.11 9.13 12.14 15.16 18.18 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.18 6.29 9.40 12.51 15.62 18.73 Monthly Charge $ 229.97 $ 455.04 $ 680.10 $ 905.16 $ 1,130.22 $ 1,355.28 Monthly Charge $ 236.87 $ 468.69 $ 700.50 $ 932.31 $ 1,164.13 $ 1,395.94

8.0 Yard $ 286.28 $ 566.10 $ 845.92 $ 1,125.74 $ 1,405.56 $ 1,685.37 8.0 Yard $ 294.87 $ 583.08 $ 871.30 $ 1,159.51 $ 1,447.72 $ 1,735.94 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.89 7.70 11.50 15.31 19.12 22.92 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.01 7.93 11.85 15.77 19.69 23.61 Monthly Charge $ 290.18 $ 573.80 $ 857.42 $ 1,141.05 $ 1,424.67 $ 1,708.29 Monthly Charge $ 298.88 $ 591.01 $ 883.15 $ 1,175.28 $ 1,467.41 $ 1,759.54 Special Collection Fees :
25% above weekly rate
(monthly rate/4.33)
Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total
Special Collection Fees :
25% above weekly rate
(monthly rate/4.33)
Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

1.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 22.62 0.31 $ 22.93 1.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 23.30 0.32 $ 23.62

1.5 Yard Non-compacted $ 26.90 0.37 $ 27.27 1.5 Yard Non-compacted $ 27.71 0.38 $ 28.08

2.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 31.18 0.42 $ 31.61 2.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 32.12 0.44 $ 32.56

3.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 39.75 0.54 $ 40.29 3.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 40.94 0.56 $ 41.50

4.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 48.32 0.66 $ 48.97 4.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 49.77 0.68 $ 50.44

6.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 65.45 0.89 $ 66.34 6.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 67.41 0.92 $ 68.33

8.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 82.58 1.12 $ 83.69 8.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 85.06 1.16 $ 86.21

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED NEW Commercial Container Rates
Fiscal Year 2020 - 2021
Landfill Monitoring fee is calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED NEW Commercial Container Rates
Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022
Landfill Monitoring fee is calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge.

Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 70
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

1.0 Yard $ 83.18 $ 165.51 $ 247.83 $ 330.16 $ 412.48 $ 494.80 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.13 2.25 3.37 4.49 5.61 6.73 Monthly Charge $ 84.31 $ 167.76 $ 251.20 $ 334.65 $ 418.09 $ 501.53

1.5 Yard $ 98.93 $ 196.58 $ 294.23 $ 391.88 $ 489.53 $ 587.18 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.35 2.67 4.00 5.33 6.66 7.99 Monthly Charge $ 100.28 $ 199.26 $ 298.23 $ 397.21 $ 496.19 $ 595.16

2.0 Yard $ 114.69 $ 227.66 $ 340.63 $ 453.60 $ 566.58 $ 679.55 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.56 3.10 4.63 6.17 7.71 9.24 Monthly Charge $ 116.25 $ 230.76 $ 345.26 $ 459.77 $ 574.28 $ 688.79

3.0 Yard $ 146.19 $ 289.81 $ 433.43 $ 577.05 $ 720.67 $ 864.29 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 1.99 3.94 5.89 7.85 9.80 11.75 Monthly Charge $ 148.18 $ 293.75 $ 439.33 $ 584.90 $ 730.47 $ 876.05

4.0 Yard $ 177.70 $ 351.96 $ 526.23 $ 700.50 $ 874.77 $ 1,049.04 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.42 4.79 7.16 9.53 11.90 14.27 Monthly Charge $ 180.11 $ 356.75 $ 533.39 $ 710.03 $ 886.67 $ 1,063.30

6.0 Yard $ 240.71 $ 476.27 $ 711.83 $ 947.40 $ 1,182.96 $ 1,418.53 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.27 6.48 9.68 12.88 16.09 19.29 Monthly Charge $ 243.98 $ 482.75 $ 721.51 $ 960.28 $ 1,199.05 $ 1,437.82

8.0 Yard $ 303.72 $ 600.58 $ 897.44 $ 1,194.29 $ 1,491.15 $ 1,788.01 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.13 8.17 12.21 16.24 20.28 24.32 Monthly Charge $ 307.85 $ 608.74 $ 909.64 $ 1,210.54 $ 1,511.43 $ 1,812.33 Special Collection Fees :
25% above weekly rate
(monthly rate/4.33)
Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

1.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 23.99 0.33 $ 24.33

1.5 Yard Non-compacted $ 28.54 0.39 $ 28.93

2.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 33.08 0.45 $ 33.53

3.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 42.17 0.57 $ 42.74

4.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 51.26 0.70 $ 51.96

6.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 69.43 0.94 $ 70.38

8.0 Yard Non-compacted $ 87.61 1.19 $ 88.79

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED NEW Commercial Container Rates
Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023
Landfill Monitoring fee is calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge.

Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 71
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

2.0 Yard $ 160.77 $ 320.21 $ 479.66 $ 639.10 $ 798.53 $ 957.97 2.0 Yard $ 169.85 $ 338.13 $ 506.42 $ 674.70 $ 842.98 $ 1,011.26 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.19 4.35 6.52 8.69 10.86 13.03 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.31 4.60 6.89 9.18 11.46 13.75 Monthly Charge $ 162.96 $ 324.57 $ 486.18 $ 647.79 $ 809.39 $ 971.00 Monthly Charge $ 172.16 $ 342.73 $ 513.30 $ 683.87 $ 854.45 $ 1,025.02

3.0 Yard $ 219.74 $ 437.49 $ 655.23 $ 872.98 $ 1,090.71 $ 1,308.46 3.0 Yard $ 231.13 $ 459.91 $ 688.69 $ 917.47 $ 1,146.24 $ 1,375.02 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.99 5.95 8.91 11.87 14.83 17.80 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.14 6.25 9.37 12.48 15.59 18.70 Monthly Charge $ 222.73 $ 443.44 $ 664.14 $ 884.85 $ 1,105.55 $ 1,326.25 Monthly Charge $ 234.27 $ 466.16 $ 698.05 $ 929.94 $ 1,161.83 $ 1,393.72

4.0 Yard $ 278.71 $ 554.76 $ 830.81 $ 1,106.86 $ 1,382.90 $ 1,658.95 4.0 Yard $ 292.41 $ 581.68 $ 870.96 $ 1,160.23 $ 1,449.51 $ 1,738.78 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.79 7.54 11.30 15.05 18.81 22.56 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.98 7.91 11.85 15.78 19.71 23.65 Monthly Charge $ 282.50 $ 562.31 $ 842.11 $ 1,121.91 $ 1,401.71 $ 1,681.51 Monthly Charge $ 296.39 $ 589.60 $ 882.80 $ 1,176.01 $ 1,469.22 $ 1,762.43

5.0 Yard* $ 337.68 $ 672.04 $ 1,006.39 $ 1,340.73 $ 1,675.09 $ 2,009.44 5.0 Yard* $ 353.69 $ 703.46 $ 1,053.23 $ 1,403.00 $ 1,752.77 $ 2,102.54 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.59 9.14 13.69 18.23 22.78 27.33 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.81 9.57 14.32 19.08 23.84 28.59 Monthly Charge $ 342.28 $ 681.18 $ 1,020.08 $ 1,358.97 $ 1,697.87 $ 2,036.77 Monthly Charge $ 358.50 $ 713.03 $ 1,067.55 $ 1,422.08 $ 1,776.60 $ 2,131.13

6.0 Yard $ 396.65 $ 789.31 $ 1,181.97 $ 1,574.61 $ 1,967.27 $ 2,359.93 6.0 Yard $ 414.97 $ 825.24 $ 1,235.50 $ 1,645.76 $ 2,056.03 $ 2,466.29 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.39 10.73 16.07 21.41 26.75 32.10 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.64 11.22 16.80 22.38 27.96 33.54 Monthly Charge $ 402.05 $ 800.04 $ 1,198.04 $ 1,596.03 $ 1,994.03 $ 2,392.02 Monthly Charge $ 420.61 $ 836.46 $ 1,252.30 $ 1,668.15 $ 2,083.99 $ 2,499.83

8.0 Yard* $ 528.87 $ 1,023.86 $ 1,533.12 $ 2,042.38 $ 2,551.64 $ 3,060.91 8.0 Yard* $ 537.53 $ 1,068.79 $ 1,600.04 $ 2,131.30 $ 2,662.55 $ 3,193.81 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.19 13.92 20.85 27.78 34.70 41.63 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.31 14.54 21.76 28.99 36.21 43.44 Monthly Charge $ 536.06 $ 1,037.78 $ 1,553.97 $ 2,070.15 $ 2,586.35 $ 3,102.54 Monthly Charge $ 544.84 $ 1,083.32 $ 1,621.80 $ 2,160.28 $ 2,698.76 $ 3,237.24 Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

2.0 Yard Compactor $ 37.13 0.50 $ 37.64 2.0 Yard Compactor $ 49.00 0.67 $ 49.66

3.0 Yard Compactor $ 50.75 0.69 $ 51.44 3.0 Yard Compactor $ 66.67 0.91 $ 67.58

4.0 Yard Compactor $ 64.37 0.88 $ 65.24 4.0 Yard Compactor $ 84.35 1.15 $ 85.50

5.0 Yard Compactor $ 77.99 1.06 $ 79.05 5.0 Yard Compactor $ 102.03 1.39 $ 103.41

6.0 Yard Compactor $ 91.61 1.25 $ 92.85 6.0 Yard Compactor $ 119.70 1.63 $ 121.33

7.0 Yard Compactor $ 103.00 1.40 $ 104.40 7.0 Yard Compactor $ 137.38 1.87 $ 139.25

8.0 Yard Compactor $ 122.14 1.66 $ 123.80 8.0 Yard Compactor $ 155.06 2.11 $ 157.17 Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

Fiscal Year 2019 - 2020
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33) Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)
Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Front Load Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2018 - 2019
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33)

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Front Load Compactor Rates
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 72
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

2.0 Yard $ 174.95 $ 348.28 $ 521.61 $ 694.94 $ 868.27 $ 1,041.60 2.0 Yard $ 180.20 $ 358.73 $ 537.26 $ 715.79 $ 894.32 $ 1,072.85 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.38 4.74 7.09 9.45 11.81 14.17 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.45 4.88 7.31 9.73 12.16 14.59 Monthly Charge $ 177.33 $ 353.01 $ 528.70 $ 704.39 $ 880.08 $ 1,055.77 Monthly Charge $ 182.65 $ 363.60 $ 544.56 $ 725.52 $ 906.48 $ 1,087.44

3.0 Yard $ 238.07 $ 473.71 $ 709.35 $ 944.99 $ 1,180.63 $ 1,416.27 3.0 Yard $ 245.21 $ 487.92 $ 730.63 $ 973.34 $ 1,216.05 $ 1,458.76 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.24 6.44 9.65 12.85 16.06 19.26 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.33 6.64 9.94 13.24 16.54 19.84 Monthly Charge $ 241.30 $ 480.15 $ 718.99 $ 957.84 $ 1,196.69 $ 1,435.53 Monthly Charge $ 248.54 $ 494.55 $ 740.56 $ 986.58 $ 1,232.59 $ 1,478.60

4.0 Yard $ 301.18 $ 599.14 $ 897.09 $ 1,195.04 $ 1,492.99 $ 1,790.94 4.0 Yard $ 310.22 $ 617.11 $ 924.00 $ 1,230.89 $ 1,537.78 $ 1,844.67 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.10 8.15 12.20 16.25 20.30 24.36 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.22 8.39 12.57 16.74 20.91 25.09 Monthly Charge $ 305.28 $ 607.28 $ 909.29 $ 1,211.29 $ 1,513.29 $ 1,815.30 Monthly Charge $ 314.44 $ 625.50 $ 936.57 $ 1,247.63 $ 1,558.69 $ 1,869.76

5.0 Yard* $ 364.30 $ 724.56 $ 1,084.83 $ 1,445.09 $ 1,805.35 $ 2,165.61 5.0 Yard* $ 375.23 $ 746.30 $ 1,117.37 $ 1,488.44 $ 1,859.51 $ 2,230.58 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.95 9.85 14.75 19.65 24.55 29.45 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.10 10.15 15.20 20.24 25.29 30.34 Monthly Charge $ 369.26 $ 734.42 $ 1,099.58 $ 1,464.74 $ 1,829.90 $ 2,195.06 Monthly Charge $ 380.33 $ 756.45 $ 1,132.57 $ 1,508.68 $ 1,884.80 $ 2,260.92

6.0 Yard $ 427.42 $ 849.99 $ 1,272.56 $ 1,695.14 $ 2,117.71 $ 2,540.28 6.0 Yard $ 440.24 $ 875.49 $ 1,310.74 $ 1,745.99 $ 2,181.24 $ 2,616.49 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.81 11.56 17.31 23.05 28.80 34.55 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.99 11.91 17.83 23.75 29.66 35.58 Monthly Charge $ 433.23 $ 861.55 $ 1,289.87 $ 1,718.19 $ 2,146.51 $ 2,574.83 Monthly Charge $ 446.23 $ 887.40 $ 1,328.57 $ 1,769.74 $ 2,210.91 $ 2,652.07

8.0 Yard $ 553.66 $ 1,100.85 $ 1,648.04 $ 2,195.24 $ 2,742.43 $ 3,289.62 8.0 Yard* $ 570.27 $ 1,133.87 $ 1,697.48 $ 2,261.09 $ 2,824.70 $ 3,388.31 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.53 14.97 22.41 29.86 37.30 44.74 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.76 15.42 23.09 30.75 38.42 46.08 Monthly Charge $ 561.19 $ 1,115.82 $ 1,670.46 $ 2,225.09 $ 2,779.73 $ 3,334.36 Monthly Charge $ 578.02 $ 1,149.30 $ 1,720.57 $ 2,291.84 $ 2,863.12 $ 3,434.39 Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

2.0 Yard Compactor $ 50.47 0.69 $ 51.15 2.0 Yard Compactor $ 51.98 0.71 $ 52.69

3.0 Yard Compactor $ 68.67 0.93 $ 69.61 3.0 Yard Compactor $ 70.73 0.96 $ 71.69

4.0 Yard Compactor $ 86.88 1.18 $ 88.06 4.0 Yard Compactor $ 89.49 1.22 $ 90.70

5.0 Yard Compactor $ 105.09 1.43 $ 106.52 5.0 Yard Compactor $ 108.24 1.47 $ 109.71

6.0 Yard Compactor $ 123.29 1.68 $ 124.97 6.0 Yard Compactor $ 126.99 1.73 $ 128.72

7.0 Yard Compactor $ 141.50 1.92 $ 143.43 7.0 Yard Compactor $ 145.75 1.98 $ 147.73

8.0 Yard Compactor $ 159.71 2.17 $ 161.88 8.0 Yard Compactor $ 164.50 2.24 $ 166.74 Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Front Load Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2020 - 2021

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Front Load Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33) Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33) Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 73
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

SIZE / COLLECTIONS PER WEEK ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX

2.0 Yard $ 185.60 $ 369.49 $ 553.37 $ 737.26 $ 921.15 $ 1,105.04 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 2.52 5.03 7.53 10.03 12.53 15.03 Monthly Charge $ 188.13 $ 374.51 $ 560.90 $ 747.29 $ 933.68 $ 1,120.06

3.0 Yard $ 252.56 $ 502.56 $ 752.55 $ 1,002.54 $ 1,252.53 $ 1,502.52 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 3.43 6.83 10.23 13.63 17.03 20.43 Monthly Charge $ 256.00 $ 509.39 $ 762.78 $ 1,016.17 $ 1,269.57 $ 1,522.96

4.0 Yard $ 319.53 $ 635.62 $ 951.72 $ 1,267.82 $ 1,583.91 $ 1,900.01 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 4.35 8.64 12.94 17.24 21.54 25.84 Monthly Charge $ 323.87 $ 644.27 $ 964.66 $ 1,285.06 $ 1,605.45 $ 1,925.85

5.0 Yard* $ 386.49 $ 768.69 $ 1,150.89 $ 1,533.09 $ 1,915.30 $ 2,297.50 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 5.26 10.45 15.65 20.85 26.05 31.25 Monthly Charge $ 391.74 $ 779.14 $ 1,166.54 $ 1,553.94 $ 1,941.34 $ 2,328.74

6.0 Yard $ 453.45 $ 901.76 $ 1,350.06 $ 1,798.37 $ 2,246.68 $ 2,694.98 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 6.17 12.26 18.36 24.46 30.55 36.65 Monthly Charge $ 459.62 $ 914.02 $ 1,368.42 $ 1,822.83 $ 2,277.23 $ 2,731.64

8.0 Yard* $ 587.37 $ 1,167.89 $ 1,748.41 $ 2,328.93 $ 2,909.44 $ 3,489.96 Landfill Monitoring (1.36%) 7.99 15.88 23.78 31.67 39.57 47.46 Monthly Charge $ 595.36 $ 1,183.77 $ 1,772.19 $ 2,360.60 $ 2,949.01 $ 3,537.42 Special Collection Fees Rate
L/F Monitoring
(1.36%) Total

2.0 Yard Compactor $ 53.54 0.73 $ 54.27

3.0 Yard Compactor $ 72.85 0.99 $ 73.85

4.0 Yard Compactor $ 92.17 1.25 $ 93.42

5.0 Yard Compactor $ 111.49 1.52 $ 113.00

6.0 Yard Compactor $ 130.80 1.78 $ 132.58

7.0 Yard Compactor $ 150.12 2.04 $ 152.16

8.0 Yard Compactor $ 169.43 2.30 $ 171.74
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023
Special collection fees are calculated at 63% higher than the weekly rate for uncompacted front-load containers to reflect the heavier weight. (The weekly rate is calculated by dividing the monthly rate by 4.33) Monthly compactor rates are calculated by multiplying single collection rate (special collection fee) by number of collections per week and then multiplying by 4.33)

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Front Load Compactor Rates
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 74
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Roll Off Size: Roll Off Size:
10 Cubic Yards $ 327.66 2.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 10 Cubic Yards $ 327.57 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.46 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.45 $ 332.12 $ 332.02
15 Cubic Yards* $ 380.67 2.75 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 15 Cubic Yards* $ 387.04 2.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.18 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.26 $ 385.85 $ 392.30
20 Cubic Yards $ 433.69 3.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 20 Cubic Yards $ 446.50 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.90 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 6.07 $ 439.59 $ 452.57
25 Cubic Yards $ 486.71 4.00 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 25 Cubic Yards $ 505.97 4.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 6.62 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 6.88 $ 493.33 $ 512.85
30 Cubic Yards $ 539.72 4.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 30 Cubic Yards $ 565.43 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 7.34 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 7.69 $ 547.06 $ 573.12
35 Cubic Yards* $ 592.74 5.00 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 35 Cubic Yards* $ 624.90 5.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.06 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.50 $ 600.80 $ 633.40
37 Cubic Yards $ 613.94 5.25 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 37 Cubic Yards $ 648.69 5.25 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.35 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.82 $ 622.29 $ 657.51
40 Cubic Yards $ 645.76 5.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 40 Cubic Yards $ 684.37 5.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.78 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.31 $ 654.54 $ 693.67
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 84.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility, the trash compactor cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility, the trash compactor cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

Weight Limit:

Overweight
Rate Per Pull: Fee:

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Roll Off Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2018 - 2019

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2019 - 2020
Rate Per Pull: Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 75
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Roll Off Size: Roll Off Size:
10 Cubic Yards $ 337.40 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 10 Cubic Yards $ 347.52 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.59 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.73 $ 341.99 $ 352.24
15 Cubic Yards* $ 398.65 2.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 15 Cubic Yards* $ 410.61 2.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.42 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.58 $ 404.07 $ 416.19
20 Cubic Yards $ 459.90 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 20 Cubic Yards $ 473.69 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 6.25 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 6.44 $ 466.15 $ 480.14
25 Cubic Yards $ 521.15 4.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 25 Cubic Yards $ 536.78 4.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 7.09 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 7.30 $ 528.23 $ 544.08
30 Cubic Yards $ 582.40 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 30 Cubic Yards $ 599.87 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 7.92 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.16 $ 590.32 $ 608.03
35 Cubic Yards* $ 643.65 5.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 35 Cubic Yards* $ 662.96 5.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.75 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.02 $ 652.40 $ 671.97
37 Cubic Yards $ 668.15 5.25 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 37 Cubic Yards $ 688.19 5.25 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.09 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.36 $ 677.23 $ 697.55
40 Cubic Yards $ 704.90 5.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 40 Cubic Yards $ 726.04 5.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.59 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.87 $ 714.48 $ 735.92
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Compactor Rates
Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility, the trash compactor cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

Rate Per Pull:

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2020 - 2021
Rate Per Pull: Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility, the trash compactor cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 76
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Roll Off Size:
10 Cubic Yards $ 357.94 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.87
$ 362.81
15 Cubic Yards* $ 422.92 2.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.75
$ 428.68
20 Cubic Yards $ 487.90 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 6.64
$ 494.54
25 Cubic Yards $ 552.88 4.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 7.52
$ 560.40
30 Cubic Yards $ 617.87 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 8.40
$ 626.27
35 Cubic Yards* $ 682.85 5.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.29
$ 692.13
37 Cubic Yards $ 708.84 5.25 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 9.64
$ 718.48
40 Cubic Yards $ 747.83 5.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 10.17
$ 758.00
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. * The City has no accounts for this size, so rates are interpolated based on larger and smaller compactor sizes.

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility, the trash compactor cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Compactor Rates
Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023
Rate Per Pull: Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 77
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Roll Off Size: Roll Off Size:
10 Cubic Yards $ 256.98 $ 18.36 1.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 10 Cubic Yards $ 248.28 $ 17.73 1.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.49 0.25 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.38 0.24 $ 260.47 $ 18.61 $ 251.66 $ 17.98
16 Cubic Yards $ 278.18 $ 19.87 1.75 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 16 Cubic Yards $ 272.07 $ 19.43 1.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.78 0.27 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.70 0.26 $ 281.96 $ 20.14 $ 275.77 $ 19.70
20 Cubic Yards $ 292.32 $ 20.88 2.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 20 Cubic Yards $ 287.93 $ 20.57 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.98 0.28 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.92 0.28 $ 296.30 $ 21.16 $ 291.84 $ 20.85
25 Cubic Yards $ 309.99 $ 22.14 3.00 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 25 Cubic Yards $ 307.75 $ 21.98 3.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.22 0.30 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.19 0.30 $ 314.21 $ 22.44 $ 311.93 $ 22.28
30 Cubic Yards $ 327.66 $ 23.40 3.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 30 Cubic Yards $ 327.57 $ 23.40 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.46 0.32 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.45 0.32 $ 332.12 $ 23.72 $ 332.02 $ 23.73
40 Cubic Yards $ 363.01 $ 25.93 4.50 Tons $ 84.00/Ton 40 Cubic Yards $ 367.21 $ 26.23 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.94 0.35 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.99 0.36 $ 367.95 $ 26.28 $ 372.21 $ 26.60
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. (Temporary Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 14 Days) (Temporary Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 14 Days) (Permanent Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 30 Days) (Permanent Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 30 Days) Rate Per 14
Days or Per
Pull:

Extended Time:
(Rate/ Day Over
Weight Limit: 14 Days)
Overweight
Fee:

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 84.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility or over filling, the roll off box cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Roll Off Rates
Fiscal Year 2018 - 2019

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Rates
Fiscal Year 2019 - 2020
Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility or over filling, the roll off box cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

Extended Time:
(Rate/ Day Over
14 Days)
Rate Per 14
Days or Per
Pull:

Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 78
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Roll Off Size: Roll Off Size:
10 Cubic Yards $ 255.73 $ 18.27 1.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 10 Cubic Yards $ 263.40 $ 18.81 1.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.48 0.25 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.58 0.26 $ 259.21 $ 18.51 $ 266.98 $ 19.07
16 Cubic Yards $ 280.23 $ 20.02 1.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 16 Cubic Yards $ 288.64 $ 20.62 1.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.81 0.27 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.93 0.28 $ 284.04 $ 20.29 $ 292.56 $ 20.90
20 Cubic Yards $ 296.56 $ 21.18 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 20 Cubic Yards $ 305.46 $ 21.82 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.03 0.29 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.15 0.30 $ 300.60 $ 21.47 $ 309.61 $ 22.12
25 Cubic Yards $ 316.98 $ 22.64 3.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 25 Cubic Yards $ 326.49 $ 23.32 3.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.31 0.31 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.44 0.32 $ 321.29 $ 22.95 $ 330.93 $ 23.64
30 Cubic Yards $ 337.40 $ 24.10 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 30 Cubic Yards $ 347.52 $ 24.82 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.59 0.33 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.73 0.34 $ 341.99 $ 24.44 $ 352.24 $ 25.17
40 Cubic Yards $ 378.23 $ 27.02 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton 40 Cubic Yards $ 389.58 $ 27.83 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.14 0.37 Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.30 0.38 $ 383.37 $ 27.39 $ 394.88 $ 28.22
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. (Temporary Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 14 Days) (Temporary Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 14 Days) (Permanent Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 30 Days) (Permanent Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 30 Days)

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Rate Per 14
Days or Per
Pull:

Extended Time:
(Rate/ Day Over
14 Days) Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

PROPOSED Roll Off Rates
Rate Per 14
Days or Per
Pull:

Extended Time:
(Rate/ Day Over
14 Days) Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility or over filling, the roll off box cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Rates
Fiscal Year 2020 - 2021
Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility or over filling, the roll off box cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

Fiscal Year 2021 - 2022
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 79
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix C, cont.

Roll Off Size:
10 Cubic Yards $ 271.30 $ 19.38 1.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 3.69 0.26
$ 274.99 $ 19.64
16 Cubic Yards $ 297.30 $ 21.24 1.75 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.04 0.29
$ 301.34 $ 21.52
20 Cubic Yards $ 314.62 $ 22.47 2.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.28 0.31
$ 318.90 $ 22.78
25 Cubic Yards $ 336.28 $ 24.02 3.00 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.57 0.33
$ 340.86 $ 24.35
30 Cubic Yards $ 357.94 $ 25.57 3.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 4.87 0.35
$ 362.81 $ 25.93
40 Cubic Yards $ 401.26 $ 28.66 4.50 Tons $ 81.00/Ton
Landfill Monitoring Fee (1.36%) 5.46 0.39
$ 406.72 $ 29.06
Landfill Monitoring fees are calculated at 1.36% on the total solid waste charge. (Temporary Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 14 Days)
(Permanent Boxes Must Be Pulled Every 30 Days)
Unable to Collect Fee: An additional fee of $ 81.00 shall be charged if by reason of inaccessibility or over filling, the roll off box cannot be collected, and an additional collection trip is necessary.

CITY OF REDDING

SOLID WASTE DIVISION
PROPOSED Roll Off Rates
Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023
Rate Per 14
Days or Per
Pull:

Extended Time:
(Rate/ Day Over
14 Days) Weight Limit:

Overweight
Fee:

Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS – February 2020 80
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix D – Additional Single-Family Residential Bill Comparisons Regional Bill Comparison (Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste) $109.79
$120.75
$127.05 $129.52 $130.97 $134.17 $137.16 $141.45
$152.44 $153.78
$188.30
$211.99
$219.36
$0
$25
$50
$75
$100
$125
$150
$175
$200
$225
$250 Monthly Bill
10-City Regional Bill Comparisons (Monthly)
Single Family Residential (Water, Wastewater & Solid Waste) Total Solid Waste (96 gal.)
Total Wastewater (8 ccf/month)
Total Water (21 ccf/month)
* Water and/or Wastewater services
provided by multiple agencies.

Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility Prepared by NBS
– February 2020 81
Final Utility Rate Program Update Report – City of Redding Appendix D, cont.

Nor-Cal Single-Family Residential Bill Comparison (Water & Wastewater) $25.41
$31.63
$51.10
$63.74
$51.76
$70.43
$86.17 $84.66
$150.29
$34.60 $34.00
$54.86 $43.68 $57.05
$55.26
$67.02
$74.47
$78.22
$60.01 $65.63
$105.96 $107.42 $108.81
$125.69
$153.19
$159.13
$228.51
$0
$25
$50
$75
$100
$125
$150
$175
$200
$225
$250
Anderson Red Bluff Redding
(Current)
Yreka Redding
(Proposed
4%)
Nor-Cal
Average
Shasta Lake Eureka Arcata Monthly Bill
Nor-Cal Regional Water & Sewer Mo. Bill Comparisons
Single Family Residential (5/8" Meter & 21 ccf/month)
Total Water
Total Wastewater
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: NBS Final Rate Study Report Feb 2020 (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5337, Utility

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 (Job No. 2666), Cape Seal 2022 Project, awarded to VSS International, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,775,864.67.

Fiscal Impact
Streets Division funding in the amount of $3,038,000 as well as Parks funding in the amount of $60,000 was approved for this project for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration, is $2,775,864.67.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not accept the project as satisfactorily complete, and advise staff on how to proceed.

Background
VSS International, Inc., has completed all items of work on the Cape Seal 2022 Project as of October 7, 2022, which was within the contract time frame. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date of October 7, 2022, and the Public Works Department subsequently filed a notice of completion with Shasta County.

At its meeting of April 19, 2022, the Council awarded a construction contract to VSS International, Inc., of West Sacramento, for $2,437,000 and approved a $283,000 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $295,000 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $43,000 for project development costs. The City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $40,000, for a total authorized amount of $3,098,000. Project MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277, Cape Seal 2022 Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 490
Report to Redding City Council January 5, 2023
Re: 4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 , Cape Seal 2022 Project Page 2 development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services. During construction, there were four change orders totaling $64,932.67 leaving a balance of $218,067.33 in the contingency fund. The final project cost was $2,775,864.67.

The project involved the placement of approximately 367,600 square yards of surface treatment in north and northeast Redding neighborhoods, as shown on the attached maps. CAPE Seal projects have been part of the City of Redding pavement preservation program since 2008. This is a two-layer system, in which a micro-surfacing material is placed over a rejuvenating scrub seal (a.k.a. chip seal).

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $43,000.00 $43,000.00
Construction Contract +
Contingency $2,720,000.00
Construction Contract +
Contract Change Orders $2,501,932.67
Contract Administration &
Inspection $295,000.00 $230,932.00
Additional City Manager
Authority $40,000.00 $0.00
Total $3,098,000.00 $2,775,864.67
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and no further action is required. On April 19, 2022, the Council determined that the Cape Seal 2022 Project was categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, per Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Cape Seal Project 2022 Location Maps
Previous Staff Report 4-19-2022
Packet Pg. 491
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: ^Cape Seal Project 2022 Location Maps (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 , Cape Seal 2022 Project)

VALLEYRIDGE DR

MIDWAY DR

CATERPILLAR RD MASON ST

TWIN VIEW BLVD

TWIN VIEW BLVD

TWIN VIEW BLVD

CATERPILLAR RD

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP
CAPE SEAL PROJECT 2022

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

OASIS RD
INTERSTATE 5
SR299E
HWY 273 HAWLEY RD

TWIN VIEW BLVD

CASCADE BLVD

OASIS RD
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: ^Cape Seal Project 2022 Location Maps (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 , Cape Seal 2022 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP
CAPE SEAL PROJECT 2022

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

OLD OREGON TRAIL

VIKING WAY

SOCCER PARK
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: ^Cape Seal Project 2022 Location Maps (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 , Cape Seal 2022 Project)

CITYOFREDDING

REPORTTOTHECITYCOUNCIL
MEETING DATE: April19, 2022 FROM: ChuckAukland, Public
ITEM NO. 4.11(a) Works Director
APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--AwardBidSchedule No. 5277, CapeSeal2022 Recommendation
Authorize thefollowing actions relative toBidSchedule No. 5277 (JobNo. 2666), CapeSeal 2022 (Project):
1) Award toVSSInternational, Inc. intheamount of $2,437,000; 2) Approve anadditional $295,000tocoverthecostofcontract administration and inspection fees;
3) Approve $283,000toprovide construction contingency funding; 4) Approve $43,000forproject development costs;
5) Authorize theCityManager toapprove additional increases, ineithertheconstruction management orconstruction contingency amounts, uptoatotalof $40,000; and 6) FindthattheProject iscategorically exempt fromreview undertheCalifornia Environmental QualityActperSection 15301(c) Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
Streets Division funds arebudgeted forthe residential streets ($3,038,000) and Park funds 60,000) arebudgeted fortheSoccer Parkparking lot. Project costcomponents areestimated, andsome shifting ofthefunds maybenecessary tobalance theproject within theapproved budget.

CostSummary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 43,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 2,720,000
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 295,000
Additional CityManager Authority $ 40,000
TotalProjectCosts $ 3,098,000
ProjectBudget $ 3,100,000
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-19-2022 (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 , Cape Seal 2022 Project) R-- 2
Alternative Action
TheCityCouncil may choose tonotaward theproject, inwhich case, thestreets willcontinue to deteriorate andrequire roadway reconstruction.

Background/Analysis
CAPE sealroadway surface treatments extend thelifeofworn pavements bycombining achip sealwithslurry sealtreatments. TheCityofRedding hasutilized thismethod tosuccessfully preserve residential streets since 2008. Thisproject includes thepavement preservation treatment invarious neighborhoods inRedding aswellastheSoccer ParkParking Lot (seeattached map).

Attached isatabulation ofthefour bidsopened onMarch 30, 2022. Thelowbidintheamount of $2,437,000 wasreceived fromVSSInternational, Inc., ofWestSacramento, California. The en2,594,646. Totalproject development costs forthisproject are estimated tobe $43,000. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (design andconstruction support).

Staff hasdetermined thattheproject qualifies asCategorically Exempt fromenvironmental review under California Environmental Quality ActGuidelines Section 15301. Theproject area doesnothave significant values forwildlife habitat orother environmental resources, andthe project hasnopotential tohaveasignificant effect ontheenvironment.

Council Priority/CityManager Goals
Thisagenda item isaroutine operational item.
c: JoshAnthony, Construction Manager-PublicWorks
TomSemb, Assistant Engineer-PublicWorks
Attachments
BidTabulation
Location Map
Notice ofExemption
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-19-2022 (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5277 , Cape Seal 2022 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job No. 2633), Replace Asphalt Concrete (AC) Surfacing 2021 Project, awarded to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,448,421.62.

Fiscal Impact
Streets Division funding in the amount of $2,500,000 was approved for this project for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration is $2,448,421.62.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not accept the project as satisfactorily complete and provide staff alternative direction.

Background
J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., has completed all items of work on the Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project as of September 30, 2022, which was within the adjusted contract time frame following weather delays and additional work. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date of September 30, 2022, and the Public Works Department subsequently filed a notice of completion with Shasta County.

At its meeting on September 21, 2021, the Council awarded a construction contract to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., of Redding, California, for $1,431,134 and approved a $250,000 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $148,000 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $40,000 for project development costs. The City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 497
Report to Redding City Council January 6, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project Page 2 amounts up to a total of $50,000. The total authorized amount for the project was $1,919,134.

Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services.

At its meeting on March 1, 2022, the Council approved an additional $430,000 in construction contingency for improvements on a section of Twin View Boulevard, which included installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, additional AC pavement, and bike lanes in concert with the City Council’s Complete Streets Policy. At its meeting on June 21, 2022, the Council approved an additional $150,000 in construction contingency utilizing Storm Drain Utility funds for replacement of a failed storm drain pipe on Shasta View Drive, which brought the total authorized construction contingency to $830,000 and the total project authorized amount to $2,499,134.

During construction, there were five change orders in the amount of $793,319.62, which includes the items previously noted. Due to the increase in the overall project scope, additional staff time was necessary to complete the project and required the shifting of funds from construction contingency to contract administration and inspection fees in the amount of $36,000 to balance the project within the approved budget. The final project cost was $2,448,421.62, which is within the amount budgeted at the time the project was awarded.

The project involved removing and replacing approximately 126,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete in worn and deteriorated sections of Churn Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Caterpillar Road, Twin View Boulevard, Old Alturas Road, and Mission De Oro Drive as well as appropriate traffic control, striping, and pavement markings as required.

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Construction Contract +
Contingency $2,261,134.00
Construction Contract +
Contract Change Orders $2,224,453.62
Contract Administration &
Inspection $148,000.00 $183,968.00
Additional City Manager
Authority $50,000.00 $0.00
Total $2,499,134.00 $2,448,421.62
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. On September 19, 2021, the Council determined that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities).

Packet Pg. 498
Report to Redding City Council January 6, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project Page 3 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Replace AC Surfacing Location Map
Previous Report 09-21-21
Previous Report 03-01-22
Previous Report 06-21-22
Packet Pg. 499

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

OLD ALTURAS RD

SHASTA VIEW DR

MISSION DE ORO DR

CHURN CREEK RD

CATERPILLAR RD TWIN VIEW BLVD

SHASTA VIEW DR
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: ^Replace AC Surfacing Location Map (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT
STATE HWY 44

OLD ALTURAS RD SHASTA VIEW DRIVE LEMA RD

OLD ALTURAS RD

TARMAC RD

VIKING WAY

VOLTAIRE WAY

ATRIUM WAY

MAYWOOD LN

INSPIRATION PL
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: ^Replace AC Surfacing Location Map (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

PALACIO DR

SHASTA VIEW BLVD

CHURN CREEK ROAD
STATE HWY 299 E COLLEGE VIEW DR

PALACIO DR
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: ^Replace AC Surfacing Location Map (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT
TWIN VIEW BLVD INTERSTATE 5
STATE HWY 299 E

CONSTITUTION WAY

TWIN VIEW BLVD

OASIS RD
INTERSTATE 5
HWY 273

CATERPILLAR RD

MOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD

OASIS RD

HAWLEY RD
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: ^Replace AC Surfacing Location Map (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

PALISADES AVE MISSION DE ORO DR

TANGLEWOOD DR

MISSION SIERRA CT
COFFEEBERRY LN INTERSTATE 5

FLOWER ASH LN MISSION DE ORO DR

BROWNING ST HILLTOP RD RIBBON BUSH WAY

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

INSPIRATION PL
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: ^Replace AC Surfacing Location Map (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job No. 2633), Replace Asphalt Concrete (AC) Surfacing 2021:
(1) Award to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,431,134; (2) Approve an additional $148,000 to cover the cost of contract administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $250,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Approve $40,000 for project development costs;
(5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases, in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts, up to a total of $50,000; and (6) Find that the Project is Categorically Exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities).

Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Streets Department and is included in its approved budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Project cost components are estimated, and some shifting of the funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 40,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 1,681,134
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 148,000
Additional City Manager Authority $ 50,000
Total Project Costs $ 1,919,134
Project Budget $ 2,500,000
MEETING DATE: September 21, 2021
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job No. 2633), Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Report to Redding City Council September 13, 2021
Re: 4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5233, Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not award the project, in which case, the streets will continue to deteriorate and require roadway reconstruction.

Background/Analysis
This project involves removing and replacing approximately 126,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete in worn and deteriorated sections of Churn Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Caterpillar Road, Twin View Boulevard, Old Alturas Road, and Mission De Oro Drive.

Attached is a tabulation of the two bids opened on September 7, 2021. The low bid in the amount of $1,431,134 was received from J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer’s estimate was $1,810,000. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $90,000. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (design and construction support).

Staff has determined that the project qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Bid Tabulation
Location Map
Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

REPLACE AC SURFACING 2021
Job No.: 2633 ENGINEER'S EST J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. Tullis, Inc. 9/7/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,489.00 $3,489.00 $750.00 $750.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 $117,150.46 $117,150.46 $125,650.00 $125,650.00 3 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing
(2") CF 126657 $9.00 $1,139,913.00 $7.15 $905,597.55 $8.90 $1,127,247.30 4 Asphalt Concrete Overlay TON 2140 $90.00 $192,600.00 $74.00 $158,360.00 $80.00 $171,200.00 5 Paving Fabric SY 35166 $2.00 $70,332.00 $2.15 $75,606.90 $2.15 $75,606.90 6 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (6") LF 100037 $1.60 $160,059.20 $0.62 $62,022.94 $0.62 $62,022.94 7 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (8") LF 1957 $2.00 $3,914.00 $1.75 $3,424.75 $1.75 $3,424.75 8 Pavement Markings (Thermoplastic) SF 2383 $9.00 $21,447.00 $6.50 $15,489.50 $6.50 $15,489.50 9 Pavement Marking (Green Bike Lane) SF 1060 $16.00 $16,960.00 $15.00 $15,900.00 $15.00 $15,900.00 10 Pavement Markers EA 2579 $6.00 $15,474.00 $5.10 $13,152.90 $5.09 $13,127.11 11 Adjust Water Valve EA 34 $750.00 $25,500.00 $685.00 $23,290.00 $750.00 $25,500.00 12 Adjust Manhole EA 20 $1,500.00 $30,000.00 $1,200.00 $24,000.00 $1,000.00 $20,000.00 13 Adjust Monument EA 10 $750.00 $7,500.00 $1,365.00 $13,650.00 $1,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $1,806,199.20 $1,431,134.00 $1,665,918.50 Bid Schedule No.: 5233
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

OLD ALTURAS RD

SHASTA VIEW DR

MISSION DE ORO DR

CHURN CREEK RD

CATERPILLAR RD TWIN VIEW BLVD

SHASTA VIEW DR
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT
STATE HWY 44

OLD ALTURAS RD SHASTA VIEW DRIVE LEMA RD

OLD ALTURAS RD

TARMAC RD

VIKING WAY

VOLTAIRE WAY

ATRIUM WAY

MAYWOOD LN

INSPIRATION PL
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

PALACIO DR

SHASTA VIEW BLVD

CHURN CREEK ROAD
STATE HWY 299 E COLLEGE VIEW DR

PALACIO DR
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT
TWIN VIEW BLVD INTERSTATE 5
STATE HWY 299 E

CONSTITUTION WAY

TWIN VIEW BLVD

OASIS RD
INTERSTATE 5
HWY 273

CATERPILLAR RD

MOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD

OASIS RD

HAWLEY RD
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

PALISADES AVE MISSION DE ORO DR

TANGLEWOOD DR

MISSION SIERRA CT
COFFEEBERRY LN INTERSTATE 5

FLOWER ASH LN MISSION DE ORO DR

BROWNING ST HILLTOP RD RIBBON BUSH WAY

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

INSPIRATION PL
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Packet Pg. 513
Attachment: Previous Report 09-21-21 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve an increase to the project budget for completion of Bid Schedule No. 5233, (Job Order No. 2633) Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 in the amount of $430,000 to the construction contingency budget, bringing the construction contingency total to $680,000.

Fiscal Impact
Additional work will cause the project budget to exceed the awarded amounts. An additional $430,000 is requested to cover an increase to the construction contingency.

COST SUMMARY
Item Awarded Amount Projected Amount
Construction Contingency $250,000.00 $680,000.00
Total Project Cost $1,919,134.00 $2,349,134.00
Total Cost Increase $430,000.00
Sufficient Street funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget to cover the estimated cost increase.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to reject the project budget increase or provide alternative direction to staff. If the Council rejects the project budget increase, the additional improvements on Twin View Boulevard would not be constructed and there would continue to be gaps in sidewalk and bicycle facilities. Future improvements would cost more than if constructed now.

MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Approve Increase to the Project Budget for Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job Order No. 2633) Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Report to Redding City Council February 23, 2022
Re: 4.11(b)--Approve Increase to Project Budget for the Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 Project Page 2
Background/Analysis
On September 21, 2021, the Council awarded the Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 (Project) to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. This project is part of the annual pavement maintenance program and involves removing and replacing approximately 126,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete in worn and deteriorated sections of Churn Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Caterpillar Road, Twin View Boulevard, Old Alturas Road, and Mission De Oro Drive.

Due to rain events and cold nighttime temperatures arriving early this season, construction was not able to begin and the project was placed in winter suspension from December 1, 2021, through April 1, 2022.

During the suspension, staff has re-evaluated the portion of the work on Twin View Boulevard.

The current project only includes replacing a 24-foot wide section of asphalt concrete along the roadway between Valley Ridge Drive and Caterpillar Road and keeping the road configuration as it currently stands. In concert with the City Council’s Complete Streets Policy, staff noticed that there are other safety related concerns that can be addressed more economically at this time.

There are two gaps of approximately 479 linear feet that lack curb, gutter, sidewalk, and shoulder/bike lanes on the westside of Twin View Boulevard. In addition, there is no center turn lane to ease traffic flow and provide for safe turning movements. Widening these two sections, adding the center turn lane and resurfacing the entire roadway will provide standard pedestrian/cycling facilities throughout the entire 2,375-foot corridor and increase safety. Much of the additional cost is attributed to increases to existing contract line items. However, there are a few additional work elements identified including excavation, concrete work, and minor storm drainage work.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Location Map
Twin View Map
Previous Staff Report 92121 (available online)
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job No. 2633), Replace Asphalt Concrete (AC) Surfacing 2021:
(1) Award to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,431,134; (2) Approve an additional $148,000 to cover the cost of contract administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $250,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Approve $40,000 for project development costs;
(5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases, in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts, up to a total of $50,000; and (6) Find that the Project is Categorically Exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities).

Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Streets Department and is included in its approved budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Project cost components are estimated, and some shifting of the funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 40,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 1,681,134
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 148,000
Additional City Manager Authority $ 50,000
Total Project Costs $ 1,919,134
Project Budget $ 2,500,000
MEETING DATE: September 21, 2021
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job No. 2633), Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Report to Redding City Council September 13, 2021
Re: 4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5233, Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not award the project, in which case, the streets will continue to deteriorate and require roadway reconstruction.

Background/Analysis
This project involves removing and replacing approximately 126,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete in worn and deteriorated sections of Churn Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Caterpillar Road, Twin View Boulevard, Old Alturas Road, and Mission De Oro Drive.

Attached is a tabulation of the two bids opened on September 7, 2021. The low bid in the amount of $1,431,134 was received from J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer’s estimate was $1,810,000. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $90,000. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (design and construction support).

Staff has determined that the project qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Bid Tabulation
Location Map
Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

REPLACE AC SURFACING 2021
Job No.: 2633 ENGINEER'S EST J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. Tullis, Inc. 9/7/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,489.00 $3,489.00 $750.00 $750.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 $117,150.46 $117,150.46 $125,650.00 $125,650.00 3 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing
(2") CF 126657 $9.00 $1,139,913.00 $7.15 $905,597.55 $8.90 $1,127,247.30 4 Asphalt Concrete Overlay TON 2140 $90.00 $192,600.00 $74.00 $158,360.00 $80.00 $171,200.00 5 Paving Fabric SY 35166 $2.00 $70,332.00 $2.15 $75,606.90 $2.15 $75,606.90 6 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (6") LF 100037 $1.60 $160,059.20 $0.62 $62,022.94 $0.62 $62,022.94 7 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (8") LF 1957 $2.00 $3,914.00 $1.75 $3,424.75 $1.75 $3,424.75 8 Pavement Markings (Thermoplastic) SF 2383 $9.00 $21,447.00 $6.50 $15,489.50 $6.50 $15,489.50 9 Pavement Marking (Green Bike Lane) SF 1060 $16.00 $16,960.00 $15.00 $15,900.00 $15.00 $15,900.00 10 Pavement Markers EA 2579 $6.00 $15,474.00 $5.10 $13,152.90 $5.09 $13,127.11 11 Adjust Water Valve EA 34 $750.00 $25,500.00 $685.00 $23,290.00 $750.00 $25,500.00 12 Adjust Manhole EA 20 $1,500.00 $30,000.00 $1,200.00 $24,000.00 $1,000.00 $20,000.00 13 Adjust Monument EA 10 $750.00 $7,500.00 $1,365.00 $13,650.00 $1,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $1,806,199.20 $1,431,134.00 $1,665,918.50 Bid Schedule No.: 5233
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

OLD ALTURAS RD

SHASTA VIEW DR

MISSION DE ORO DR

CHURN CREEK RD

CATERPILLAR RD TWIN VIEW BLVD

SHASTA VIEW DR
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT
STATE HWY 44

OLD ALTURAS RD SHASTA VIEW DRIVE LEMA RD

OLD ALTURAS RD

TARMAC RD

VIKING WAY

VOLTAIRE WAY

ATRIUM WAY

MAYWOOD LN

INSPIRATION PL
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

PALACIO DR

SHASTA VIEW BLVD

CHURN CREEK ROAD
STATE HWY 299 E COLLEGE VIEW DR

PALACIO DR
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT
TWIN VIEW BLVD INTERSTATE 5
STATE HWY 299 E

CONSTITUTION WAY

TWIN VIEW BLVD

OASIS RD
INTERSTATE 5
HWY 273

CATERPILLAR RD

MOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD

OASIS RD

HAWLEY RD
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

PALISADES AVE MISSION DE ORO DR

TANGLEWOOD DR

MISSION SIERRA CT
COFFEEBERRY LN INTERSTATE 5

FLOWER ASH LN MISSION DE ORO DR

BROWNING ST HILLTOP RD RIBBON BUSH WAY

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

REPLACE AC SURFACING
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 2021

DEPARTMENT

INSPIRATION PL
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Packet Pg. 526
Attachment: Previous Report 03-01-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve increases to the project budget in the amount of $150,000 for emergency repairs of Bid Schedule No. 5233, Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 as outlined below:
(1) Increase of $150,000 to the construction contingency budget, bringing the construction contingency total to $830,000;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 44th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $150,000 in Storm Drain Utility funds to the project; and
(3) Find that the project is Categorically Exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301. (c) – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
Additional work will cause the project budget to exceed the awarded amounts. An additional $150,000 is requested to cover an increase to the construction contingency. This is a preliminary estimate based on information available at this time. Staff will direct the contractor to make the necessary repairs to replace a failed storm drain pipe and ensure the roadway is safe for vehicular traffic. However, costs may increase due to unforeseen conditions and staff may return to the City Council (Council) to ratify additional costs, if necessary. Storm Drain Utility funds of $150,000 are available to be applied to this project, and are accounted for in the budget resolution.

COST SUMMARY
Item Awarded Amount Projected Amount
Construction Contingency $680,000.00 $830,000.00
Total Project Cost $2,349,134.00 $2,499,134.00
Total Cost Increase $150,000.00
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(l)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(l)--Approve Increase to the Project Budget for Bid Schedule No. 5233 (Job Order No. 2633) Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Previous Report 06-21-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Report to Redding City Council June 15, 2022
Re: 4.11(l)--Approve Increase to Project Budget-Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 Project Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose to reject the project budget increase or provide alternative direction to staff. If the Council rejects the project budget increase, the storm drain replacement on Shasta View Drive will not be constructed, and there would continue to be a safety hazard requiring the closure of one of the northbound lanes located about 1,500 feet north of Tarmac Road.

Background/Analysis
On September 21, 2021, the Council awarded the Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 (Project) to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. This project is part of the annual pavement maintenance program and involves removing and replacing approximately 126,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete in worn and deteriorated sections of Churn Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Caterpillar Road, Twin View Boulevard, Old Alturas Road, and Mission De Oro Drive.

Shortly after paving Shasta View Drive in June 2022, a sinkhole appeared in the north bound number one lane approximately 1,500 feet north of Tarmac Road. The travel lane was immediately closed to vehicular traffic. Staff investigated and found that a 135-foot-long section of storm drain pipe under Shasta View Drive had failed and was washing away bedding and road base material which resulted in the collapse of the road surface above.

To prevent further collapse of the road surface and fully reopen Shasta View Drive, the old 36- inch wide concrete pipe will be removed and replaced with a similarly sized high density polyethylene pipe that is better suited for the soil conditions. The increased contingency amount is estimated to cover the cost of the additional work.

Staff has determined that the project qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project involves the repair and maintenance of existing facilities and will not result in expansion of use. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
NOE Updated Replace AC Surfacing 2021
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Previous Report 06-21-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 44TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078
APPROPRIATING $150,000 IN STORM DRAIN FUNDING FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING 2021 PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
147 809

Storm Drain Utility Capital $150,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Beginning Balance
147-809-1-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 150,000
Increase Expenditures
147-809-3576-01 Slurry/Chip/Cape Seal $150,000
Total $ 150,000 $ 150,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $150,000 in Storm Drain funding for the Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2021 Project for fiscal year 2021-22.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of June, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Previous Report 06-21-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

LOCATION MAP
REPLACE AC SURFACING PROJECT 2021
Emergency Storm Drain Repair
STATE HWY 44

OLD ALTURAS RD OLD ALTURAS RD

TARMAC RD

VIKING WAY

VOLTAIRE WAY

ATRIUM WAY

MAYWOOD LN

CITY OF REDDING

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

SHASTA VIEW DRIVE

PROJECT

LOCATION
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Previous Report 06-21-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project) Packet Pg. 531
Attachment: Previous Report 06-21-22 (4.11(d)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5233 Replace AC Surfacing 2021 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution amending the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization Supervisory/Confidential Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Salary Ranges to change the classification series titles of Systems Analyst/Programmer I, II, III, to Applications Analyst I, II, III; and add the Electrical Technician classification to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers-Electric Unit Schedule of Wage Rates pursuant to a bargaining unit modification, effective January 8, 2023.

Fiscal Impact
There will be no fiscal impact for adopting the resolution as proposed.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could decline to approve the resolution and the Redding Independent Employees Organization (RIEO) classification titles for the Systems Analyst/Computer Programmer series would remain unchanged, and the Electrical Technician classification will not be documented on a Council approved salary schedule.

Background/Analysis
On December 20, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution Number 2022-037 changing the classification titles of Systems Analyst/Programmer I, II, III, to Applications Analyst I, II, III on the RIEO Clerical, Technical and Professional Non-Exempt and Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Wage Rates. However, the RIEO Supervisory/Confidential Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Salary Ranges was inadvertently omitted from the staff report and resolution. Therefore, staff recommends the Council approve the amended RIEO Supervisory/Confidential Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Salary Ranges to include the changed classification titles.

MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.15(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(b)--Adopt Resolution amending the Redding Independent Employees' Organization Supervisory/Confidential Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Salary Ranges and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers-Electric Unit Schedule of Wage Rates.

Kelley Martinez, Personnel
Manager
Packet Pg. 532
Report to Redding City Council January 10, 2023
Re: 4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW ElectricPage 2 Further, on February 15, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution Number 2022-017, formally certifying the bargaining unit modification of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1245 AFL-CIO Electric Employees Unit (IBEW Electric Unit) acknowledging IBEW Electric Unit as the exclusively recognized employee organization for the classification of Electrical Technician in accordance with the City of Redding’s EmployerEmployee Relations Resolution and the Meyers-Milias Brown Act. The Electrical Technician classification was formerly recognized by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers – Maintenance Unit (IBEW Maintenance) and was documented on the IBEW Maintenance Schedule of Wage Rates. The IBEW Electric Schedule of Wage Rates has now been updated to reflect the change of bargaining units for the Electrical Technician classification.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
RIEO SC Exempt-January 8, 2023
RIEO SC Exempt-July 23, 2023
RIEO SC Exempt-July 21, 2024
IBEW Electric Salary Schedule-January 8, 2023
Reso 2022-017 - Certifying the Unit Modification of the IBEW Electrical Unit Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules
Packet Pg. 533
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

APPROVING ADJUSTMENT TO THE REDDING INDEPENDENT
EMPLOYEES’ ORGANIZATION ‒ SUPERVISORY/CONFIDENTIAL UNIT

EXEMPT SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES
CHANGING CLASSIFICATION TITLES; AND ADD THE ELECTRICAL

TECHNICIAN CLASSIFICATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS ‒ ELECTRIC UNIT

SCHEDULE OF WAGE RATES PURSUANT TO A UNIT MODIFICATION, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 8, 2023
WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization ‒ Supervisory/Confidential Exempt Unit Schedule of Classifications and Salary Ranges be amended to change classification titles; and add the Electrical Technician classification to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ‒ Electric Bargaining Unit Schedule of Wage Rates pursuant to a unit modification, effective January 8, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendation;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council that the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization ‒ Supervisory/Confidential Unit Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Salary Ranges be amended to change classification titles; and that the Electrical Technician classification be added to the International Brotherhood of Electric Workers ‒ Electric Unit Schedule of Wage Rates, effective January 8, 2023; and

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the seventeenth day of January, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
####### ####### ###### ###### ###### ###### ########
124 Senior Civil Engineer $7,823 $8,214 $8,625 $9,056 $9,509 $9,984 $10,484 $11,008 216 City Surveyor $7,353 $7,720 $8,106 $8,512 $8,937 $9,384 $9,853 $10,346 74 Construction Manager $7,328 $7,695 $8,079 $8,483 $8,907 $9,353 $9,820 $10,311 176 Information Technology Supervisor $7,241 $7,603 $7,983 $8,383 $8,802 $9,242 $9,704 $10,189 183 Public Works Supervisor - Water $7,082 $7,436 $7,808 $8,198 $8,608 $9,038 $9,490 $9,965 596 P/W Supervisor Wastewater-Grade V $6,859 $7,202 $7,562 $7,941 $8,338 $8,754 $9,192 $9,652 221 Permit Center Supervisor $6,772 $7,111 $7,466 $7,840 $8,232 $8,643 $9,075 $9,529 222 Development Services Supervisor $6,772 $7,111 $7,466 $7,840 $8,232 $8,643 $9,075 $9,529 597 P/W Supervisor Wastewater-Grade IV $6,703 $7,039 $7,391 $7,760 $8,148 $8,556 $8,983 $9,432 173 Housing Program Supervisor $6,578 $6,906 $7,252 $7,614 $7,995 $8,395 $8,815 $9,255 200 Network Administrator II $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 201 Systems Administrator II $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 171 Senior Accountant $6,460 $6,783 $7,122 $7,478 $7,852 $8,245 $8,657 $9,090 208 P/W Supervisor - Solid Waste Operations $6,376 $6,695 $7,029 $7,381 $7,750 $8,137 $8,544 $8,971 174 Applications Analyst III Systems Analyst/Programmer III $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,440 $8,863 187 Assistant City Clerk $6,251 $6,564 $6,892 $7,236 $7,598 $7,978 $8,377 $8,796 188 Deputy City Treasurer $6,251 $6,564 $6,892 $7,236 $7,598 $7,978 $8,377 $8,796 211 Code Enforcement Supervisor $6,001 $6,301 $6,616 $6,947 $7,295 $7,659 $8,042 $8,444 161 Inspection Services Supervisor $6,001 $6,301 $6,616 $6,947 $7,295 $7,659 $8,042 $8,444 598 Wastewater Compliance Coordinator $5,933 $6,230 $6,541 $6,868 $7,212 $7,572 $7,951 $8,348 196 Database Administrator $5,922 $6,218 $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 142 Network Administrator I $5,922 $6,218 $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 143 Systems Administrator I $5,922 $6,218 $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 149 Water Systems Specialist (D3/D4) $5,889 $6,183 $6,492 $6,817 $7,158 $7,516 $7,892 $8,286 215 Personnel Analyst II $5,832 $6,124 $6,430 $6,752 $7,089 $7,444 $7,816 $8,207 168 Public Works Supervisor $5,735 $6,021 $6,322 $6,639 $6,971 $7,319 $7,685 $8,069 229 Applications Analyst II Systems Analyst/Programmer II $5,713 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 170 Water Conservation Specialist $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,648 $8,031 232 Management Analyst II $5,681 $5,965 $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 144 Technical Services Supervisor $5,587 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 $6,791 $7,130 $7,487 $7,861 210 Senior Housing Specialist $5,533 $5,810 $6,101 $6,406 $6,726 $7,062 $7,415 $7,786 235 Crime Analyst $5,375 $5,644 $5,926 $6,223 $6,534 $6,860 $7,203 $7,564 147 Utility Field Services Supervisor $5,269 $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 160 Facility Supervisor $5,269 $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 157 Fleet Shop Supervisor $5,269 $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 100 Wastewater Laboratory Supervisor $5,203 $5,463 $5,736 $6,023 $6,324 $6,640 $6,972 $7,321 228 Applications Analyst I Systems Analyst/Programmer I $5,181 $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 213 Engineering Technician III $5,164 $5,422 $5,693 $5,978 $6,277 $6,591 $6,920 $7,266 145 NPDES Coordinator $5,118 $5,374 $5,642 $5,924 $6,221 $6,532 $6,858 $7,201 Monthly Salary Rates - Salary Steps

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANZIATION

SUPERVISORY/CONFIDENTIAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "B-1"

EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES Effective: January 8, 2023
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: RIEO SC Exempt-January 8, 2023 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
214 Personnel Analyst I $5,060 $5,313 $5,578 $5,857 $6,150 $6,458 $6,781 $7,120 237 Customer Service Supervisor $4,935 $5,181 $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,943 224 Recreation Supervisor II $4,902 $5,147 $5,405 $5,675 $5,959 $6,257 $6,569 $6,898 186 Police Services Supervisor $4,781 $5,020 $5,271 $5,535 $5,811 $6,102 $6,407 $6,727 241 Office Services Supervisor $4,614 $4,844 $5,087 $5,341 $5,608 $5,888 $6,183 $6,492 193 Recreation Supervisor I $4,513 $4,739 $4,976 $5,224 $5,486 $5,760 $6,048 $6,350 217 Workflow Coordinator $4,329 $4,546 $4,773 $5,012 $5,262 $5,526 $5,802 $6,092 250 Executive Assistant to Assistant $4,067 $4,271 $4,484 $4,708 $4,944 $5,191 $5,450 $5,723 City Manager
126.00
Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Monthly Salary Rates - Salary Steps
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: RIEO SC Exempt-January 8, 2023 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
####### ####### ###### ###### ###### 0.9070295 0.9523810 124 Senior Civil Engineer $8,214 $8,625 $9,056 $9,509 $9,984 $10,484 $11,008 $11,558 216 City Surveyor $7,720 $8,106 $8,512 $8,937 $9,384 $9,853 $10,346 $10,863 74 Construction Manager $7,695 $8,079 $8,483 $8,907 $9,353 $9,820 $10,311 $10,827 176 Information Technology Supervisor $7,603 $7,983 $8,383 $8,802 $9,242 $9,704 $10,189 $10,699 183 Public Works Supervisor - Water $7,436 $7,808 $8,198 $8,608 $9,038 $9,490 $9,965 $10,463 596 P/W Supervisor Wastewater-Grade V $7,202 $7,562 $7,941 $8,338 $8,754 $9,192 $9,652 $10,134 221 Permit Center Supervisor $7,111 $7,466 $7,840 $8,232 $8,643 $9,075 $9,529 $10,006 222 Development Services Supervisor $7,111 $7,466 $7,840 $8,232 $8,643 $9,075 $9,529 $10,006 597 P/W Supervisor Wastewater-Grade IV $7,039 $7,391 $7,760 $8,148 $8,556 $8,983 $9,432 $9,904 173 Housing Program Supervisor $6,906 $7,252 $7,614 $7,995 $8,395 $8,815 $9,255 $9,718 200 Network Administrator II $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 $9,646 201 Systems Administrator II $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 $9,646 171 Senior Accountant $6,783 $7,122 $7,478 $7,852 $8,245 $8,657 $9,090 $9,544 208 P/W Supervisor - Solid Waste Operations $6,695 $7,029 $7,381 $7,750 $8,137 $8,544 $8,971 $9,420 174 Applications Analyst III $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,440 $8,863 $9,306 187 Assistant City Clerk $6,564 $6,892 $7,236 $7,598 $7,978 $8,377 $8,796 $9,236 188 Deputy City Treasurer $6,564 $6,892 $7,236 $7,598 $7,978 $8,377 $8,796 $9,236 211 Code Enforcement Supervisor $6,301 $6,616 $6,947 $7,295 $7,659 $8,042 $8,444 $8,867 161 Inspection Services Supervisor $6,301 $6,616 $6,947 $7,295 $7,659 $8,042 $8,444 $8,867 598 Wastewater Compliance Coordinator $6,230 $6,541 $6,868 $7,212 $7,572 $7,951 $8,348 $8,766 196 Database Administrator $6,218 $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 142 Network Administrator I $6,218 $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 143 Systems Administrator I $6,218 $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 149 Water Systems Specialist (D3/D4) $6,183 $6,492 $6,817 $7,158 $7,516 $7,892 $8,286 $8,700 215 Personnel Analyst II $6,124 $6,430 $6,752 $7,089 $7,444 $7,816 $8,207 $8,617 168 Public Works Supervisor $6,021 $6,322 $6,639 $6,971 $7,319 $7,685 $8,069 $8,473 229 Applications Analyst II $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 $8,440 170 Water Conservation Specialist $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,648 $8,031 $8,432 232 Management Analyst II $5,965 $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 $8,394 144 Technical Services Supervisor $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 $6,791 $7,130 $7,487 $7,861 $8,254 210 Senior Housing Specialist $5,810 $6,101 $6,406 $6,726 $7,062 $7,415 $7,786 $8,175 235 Crime Analyst $5,644 $5,926 $6,223 $6,534 $6,860 $7,203 $7,564 $7,942 147 Utility Field Services Supervisor $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 160 Facility Supervisor $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 157 Fleet Shop Supervisor $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 100 Wastewater Laboratory Supervisor $5,463 $5,736 $6,023 $6,324 $6,640 $6,972 $7,321 $7,687 228 Applications Analyst I $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 213 Engineering Technician III $5,422 $5,693 $5,978 $6,277 $6,591 $6,920 $7,266 $7,630 145 NPDES Coordinator $5,374 $5,642 $5,924 $6,221 $6,532 $6,858 $7,201 $7,561 Monthly Salary Rates - Salary Steps

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANZIATION

SUPERVISORY/CONFIDENTIAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "B-2"

EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES Effective: July 23, 2023
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: RIEO SC Exempt-July 23, 2023 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
214 Personnel Analyst I $5,313 $5,578 $5,857 $6,150 $6,458 $6,781 $7,120 $7,476 237 Customer Service Supervisor $5,181 $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,943 $7,291 224 Recreation Supervisor II $5,147 $5,405 $5,675 $5,959 $6,257 $6,569 $6,898 $7,243 186 Police Services Supervisor $5,020 $5,271 $5,535 $5,811 $6,102 $6,407 $6,727 $7,064 241 Office Services Supervisor $4,844 $5,087 $5,341 $5,608 $5,888 $6,183 $6,492 $6,817 193 Recreation Supervisor I $4,739 $4,976 $5,224 $5,486 $5,760 $6,048 $6,350 $6,668 217 Workflow Coordinator $4,546 $4,773 $5,012 $5,262 $5,526 $5,802 $6,092 $6,397 250 Executive Assistant to Assistant $4,271 $4,484 $4,708 $4,944 $5,191 $5,450 $5,723 $6,009 City Manager
126.00
Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Monthly Salary Rates - Salary Steps
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: RIEO SC Exempt-July 23, 2023 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
####### ####### ###### ###### ####### 0.9070295 0.9523810 124 Senior Civil Engineer $8,625 $9,056 $9,509 $9,984 $10,484 $11,008 $11,558 $12,136 216 City Surveyor $8,106 $8,512 $8,937 $9,384 $9,853 $10,346 $10,863 $11,406 74 Construction Manager $8,079 $8,483 $8,907 $9,353 $9,820 $10,311 $10,827 $11,368 176 Information Technology Supervisor $7,983 $8,383 $8,802 $9,242 $9,704 $10,189 $10,699 $11,233 183 Public Works Supervisor - Water $7,808 $8,198 $8,608 $9,038 $9,490 $9,965 $10,463 $10,986 596 P/W Supervisor Wastewater-Grade V $7,562 $7,941 $8,338 $8,754 $9,192 $9,652 $10,134 $10,641 221 Permit Center Supervisor $7,466 $7,840 $8,232 $8,643 $9,075 $9,529 $10,006 $10,506 222 Development Services Supervisor $7,466 $7,840 $8,232 $8,643 $9,075 $9,529 $10,006 $10,506 597 P/W Supervisor Wastewater-Grade IV $7,391 $7,760 $8,148 $8,556 $8,983 $9,432 $9,904 $10,399 173 Housing Program Supervisor $7,252 $7,614 $7,995 $8,395 $8,815 $9,255 $9,718 $10,204 200 Network Administrator II $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 201 Systems Administrator II $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 $9,646 $10,128 171 Senior Accountant $7,122 $7,478 $7,852 $8,245 $8,657 $9,090 $9,544 $10,021 208 P/W Supervisor - Solid Waste Operations $7,029 $7,381 $7,750 $8,137 $8,544 $8,971 $9,420 $9,891 174 Applications Analyst III $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,440 $8,863 $9,306 $9,771 187 Assistant City Clerk $6,892 $7,236 $7,598 $7,978 $8,377 $8,796 $9,236 $9,698 188 Deputy City Treasurer $6,892 $7,236 $7,598 $7,978 $8,377 $8,796 $9,236 $9,698 211 Code Enforcement Supervisor $6,616 $6,947 $7,295 $7,659 $8,042 $8,444 $8,867 $9,310 161 Inspection Services Supervisor $6,616 $6,947 $7,295 $7,659 $8,042 $8,444 $8,867 $9,310 598 Wastewater Compliance Coordinator $6,541 $6,868 $7,212 $7,572 $7,951 $8,348 $8,766 $9,204 196 Database Administrator $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 142 Network Administrator I $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 143 Systems Administrator I $6,529 $6,855 $7,198 $7,558 $7,936 $8,333 $8,749 $9,187 149 Water Systems Specialist (D3/D4) $6,492 $6,817 $7,158 $7,516 $7,892 $8,286 $8,700 $9,135 215 Personnel Analyst II $6,430 $6,752 $7,089 $7,444 $7,816 $8,207 $8,617 $9,048 168 Public Works Supervisor $6,322 $6,639 $6,971 $7,319 $7,685 $8,069 $8,473 $8,896 229 Applications Analyst II $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 $8,440 $8,862 170 Water Conservation Specialist $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,648 $8,031 $8,432 $8,854 232 Management Analyst II $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 $8,394 $8,814 144 Technical Services Supervisor $6,159 $6,467 $6,791 $7,130 $7,487 $7,861 $8,254 $8,667 210 Senior Housing Specialist $6,101 $6,406 $6,726 $7,062 $7,415 $7,786 $8,175 $8,584 235 Crime Analyst $5,926 $6,223 $6,534 $6,860 $7,203 $7,564 $7,942 $8,339 147 Utility Field Services Supervisor $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 $8,174 160 Facility Supervisor $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 $8,174 157 Fleet Shop Supervisor $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 $8,174 100 Wastewater Laboratory Supervisor $5,736 $6,023 $6,324 $6,640 $6,972 $7,321 $7,687 $8,071 228 Applications Analyst I $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 213 Engineering Technician III $5,693 $5,978 $6,277 $6,591 $6,920 $7,266 $7,630 $8,011 145 NPDES Coordinator $5,642 $5,924 $6,221 $6,532 $6,858 $7,201 $7,561 $7,939 Monthly Salary Rates - Salary Steps

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANZIATION

SUPERVISORY/CONFIDENTIAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "B-3"

EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES Effective: July 21, 2024
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: RIEO SC Exempt-July 21, 2024 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
214 Personnel Analyst I $5,578 $5,857 $6,150 $6,458 $6,781 $7,120 $7,476 $7,849 237 Customer Service Supervisor $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,943 $7,291 $7,655 224 Recreation Supervisor II $5,405 $5,675 $5,959 $6,257 $6,569 $6,898 $7,243 $7,605 186 Police Services Supervisor $5,271 $5,535 $5,811 $6,102 $6,407 $6,727 $7,064 $7,417 241 Office Services Supervisor $5,087 $5,341 $5,608 $5,888 $6,183 $6,492 $6,817 $7,157 193 Recreation Supervisor I $4,976 $5,224 $5,486 $5,760 $6,048 $6,350 $6,668 $7,001 217 Workflow Coordinator $4,773 $5,012 $5,262 $5,526 $5,802 $6,092 $6,397 $6,716 250 Executive Assistant to Assistant $4,484 $4,708 $4,944 $5,191 $5,450 $5,723 $6,009 $6,310 City Manager
126.00
Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Monthly Salary Rates - Salary Steps
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: RIEO SC Exempt-July 21, 2024 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW Electric) Step 5
Monthly
J/C Classification 1 2 3 4 5 Equivalent
888 Utility Worker $ 16.18 * $ 18.33 * $ 20.77 * $ 28.35 $ 29.77 $5,159 886 Power Plant Utility Worker $ 16.18 * $ 18.33 * $ 20.77 * $ 28.35 $ 29.77 $5,159 850 Groundman $ 29.69 $ 31.18 $5,404
827 Line Equipment Operator $ 34.10 $5,911
842 Power Plant Warehouse Worker $ 33.61 $ 35.29 $6,118 840 Warehouse Worker $ 33.61 $ 35.29 $6,118
835 Utility Arborist $ 37.82 $6,556
885 Equipment Service Worker $ 39.33 $6,816
836 Senior Utility Arborist $ 40.69 $7,052
825 Warehouse Leadman $ 42.79 $7,417
804 Maintenance Coordination Assistant $ 43.66 $7,568
833 Power Plant Auxiliary Operator $44.51 $ 46.74 $8,101 515 Electrical Technician $43.89 $46.08 $ 48.39 $8,387
821 Substation Maintenance Worker $44.88 $47.12 $ 49.48 $8,576 822 Power Plant Maintenance Mechanic $ 53.06 $9,198
823 Power Plant Operator $ 55.60 $9,637
817 Lineman $ 56.42 $9,779
816 Instrument & Electrical Technician $ 58.05 $10,062
818 Lineman (Training Rate) $ 58.39 $10,121
812 Troubleman $ 59.19 $10,259
834 Power Plant Relief Operator $ 60.05 $10,408
819 Lineman (Certification Rate) $ 60.37 $10,463
828 Meter Technician (Certification Rate) $ 60.37 $10,463 815 Substation Electrical Technician $ 60.37 $10,463
806 Troubleman (Training Rate) $ 61.26 $10,619
810 Working Foreman - Line $ 61.94 $10,737
807 Troubleman (Certification Rate) $ 63.33 $10,978
801 Electrical Inspector $ 63.38 $10,986
813 Working Foreman - Power Plant Maintenance Mechanic $ 63.74 $11,048 814 Working Foreman - Power Plant Operations $ 63.74 $11,048 802 Working Foreman - Instrument & Electrical Technician $ 63.74 $11,048 808 Working Foreman - Line (Training Rate) $ 64.11 $11,113 809 Working Foreman - Line (Certification Rate) $ 66.28 $11,489 829 Working Foreman - Meter Technician (Certification Rate) $ 66.28 $11,489 811 Working Foreman - Substation Electrical Technician $ 66.28 $11,489 805 Control and Automation Technician $ 66.78 $11,576
* Full-time temporary employees only
Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS - ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT A-3: SCHEDULE OF WAGE RATES
Effective Date: January 8, 2023
Hourly Pay Rate - Salary Step
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: IBEW Electric Salary Schedule-January 8, 2023 (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in IBEW RESOLUTIQN NQ. 2Q22- 017

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY QF REDDING

CERTIFYING THE UNIT MQDIFICATION QF THE INTERNATIONAL
BRClTHERHOt D t7F ELECTRICAL WOR:KERS LOCAL UNION 1245
AFL-CI4 ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES UNIT, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1S, 2022 WHEREAS, the City received a petition for unit modificati n af the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers— Local 1245 Electric Emplayees LTnit acknowledging IBEW Electric Unit as the Exclusively Reeognized Employee Organization far the elassification of Eleetrical Technician in accQrdance with the City af Redding' s Emplayer- Employee Relations Resolution and the Myers- Millias-Brown Act, effective February 15, 2022; and WFIEREAS, the petition was in compliance with the requirements of Article II, Section 7, of the Employer- Emplayee Relatians Resolution and the proposed unit modification petition conforms to the requirements of Article II, Sections 1 and 4, of the Employer- Employee Relatians Resolution; and WHEREAS, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers— Local 1245 Electric Employees Unit certified that the eight employees holding regular full-time positions within the covered classification voted in favor of the unit modification and subsequent recagnition; and WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the City Council farmally certify and recognize the International Brotherhood of Eleetrical Workers — Local 1245 Electric Employees Unit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the classification of Electrical Teehnician in accordance with the City of Redding' s Employer- Employee Relations Resalution and the Myers- Millias- Brown Act, effective February 15, 2022; and W-IEREAS, the City Couneil deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendation;
NQW, TIIEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOL ED by the City Council that the Council certifies and recognizes the International BrotherhoQd of Electrical Workers — Laca1 1245 Electric Employees ITnit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the classification of Electrical Technician in aecordance with the City of Redding' s Employer- Emp oyee Relations Resolution and the Myers- Millias-BrQwn Act, effeetive February 15, 2Q22.

Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Reso 2022-017 - Certifying the Unit Modification of the IBEW Electrical Unit (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following
vote:

AYES: Cauncil Members— Dacquista, Mezzano, Resner, Winter, and Schreder NC} ES: Council Members— None
ABSTAIN: Council Members— None
ABSENT: Cauncil Members— Nane
a'
KRISTEN SC DER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED.
a
r
PA ELA MIZE, lea°_ ARRY E. DeWALT, City Attarney
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Reso 2022-017 - Certifying the Unit Modification of the IBEW Electrical Unit (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Packet Pg. 544
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 545
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 546
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 547
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 548
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 549
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 550
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 551
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 552
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in Packet Pg. 553
Attachment: Reso 2022-137 - Adjusting RIEO CTP Salary Schedules (4.15(b)--Change classification titles in RIEO and add Classification in

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Mayor’s recommendation to appoint Kristina Randle to fill an unscheduled vacancy on the City of Redding’s Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation.

Background/Analysis
The Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee was formed at the September 6, 2022, City Council meeting. Robert Siderine was selected as a member of the newly formed committee. Mr.

Siderine contacted staff and resigned due to scheduling changes. Kristina Randle has expressed an interest in serving and would be an asset to the committee.

Environmental Review
Appointment to the Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee does not represent a project and no determination under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Previous Staff Report - City Council Formation September 6, 2022 MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider Mayor's appointment to the City's Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee.

Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
Packet Pg. 554

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Approve formation of the Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee (Committee) to include 15 members consisting of two members appointed by each City Council member, three Planning Commissioners, and two Community Services Advisory Commission (CSAC) members; and
(2) Approve the Goals and Objectives of the Committee to include a review of the existing Tree Management Ordinance, identify deficiencies, and make recommendations for updates and improvements to the ordinance including organization, layout, and structure.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact resulting from the formation of the proposed committee other than staff time and incidental expenses.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose to not form the proposed committee and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The current Tree Management Ordinance was originally adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2006, and since that time has not been updated. Some community members have expressed interest in updating the Tree Management Ordinance to contain additional regulations aimed at better protecting and preserving native tree species. The formation of the Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee (Committee) is the first step in engaging community stakeholders and beginning discussions regarding what, if any, updates to the ordinance should be considered.

The purpose of this agenda item is to 1) formalize the membership of the Committee, and 2) MEETING DATE: September 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.4(b)--Consider formation of Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee and define Goals and Objectives of the Committee.

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - City Council Formation September 6, 2022 (5.1--Appointment-Tree Management Ordinance Update Report to Redding City Council August 30, 2022
Re: 9.4(b)--Formation of Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee and Define Goals and Objectives Page 2
define the goals and objectives of the Committee.

On August 2, 2022, the City Council authorized the formation of the Committee consisting of two (2) members appointed by each Councilmember, three (3) Planning Commissioners, and two (2) Community Services Advisory Commission members. In order to inform and encourage community members to apply for the Committee, staff updated the City Clerk’s website to include an application form, published a press release, and released informational videos and advertisements to the City’s social media outlets. The application period closed on August 17 and 29 applications were received. The City Councilmembers reviewed these applications and made their member selections. The Planning Commission appointed its members to the Committee at its meeting on August 23, and the Community Services Advisory Commission will appoint its members at its meeting on September 7. The proposed members of the Committee are shown on Attachment A.

Generally speaking, the objective of the Committee will be to review the existing Tree Management Ordinance (RMC 18.45), identify deficiencies, and make recommendations for updates and improvements to the ordinance including organization, layout, and structure. More specifically, the Committee will be charged with 1) reviewing whether mitigation fees should be imposed for tree removal, and 2) if tree planting requirements for development projects should be revised. Additional detail regarding the proposed goals and objectives of the Committee is shown on Attachment A.

Environmental Review
Any changes to the Tree Management Ordinance is a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). However, formation of the committee to simply review the ordinance and recommend changes is not a project under CEQA and therefore no further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
Attachments
Attachment A - Committee Members and Goals and Objectives (attached) August 2, 2022 City Council Staff Report (available online) Tree Management Ordinance (available online)
Attachments
^Attachment A - Committee Members and Goals and Objectives Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - City Council Formation September 6, 2022 (5.1--Appointment-Tree Management Ordinance Update Subject: 9.4 (b) Formation of Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee and Define Goals and Objectives of the Committee

ATTACHMENT A
Membership
City Council Appointed Members:

Stacey Weller
Matthew Padilla
Robert Siderine
Margaret Yarnell
David Ledger
John Wilson
Rocky Slaughter
Blake Fisher
Jeff Audette
Aleta Carpenter
Planning Commissioners:

Aaron Hatch
Brandi Greene
Cameron Middleton
Community Services Advisory Commission Members:

Ericka Jones
Douglas DeMallie
Goals and Objectives
The committee will review the existing Tree Management Ordinance (RMC 18.45) and attempt to reach consensus for recommended updates to the ordinance as follows:
• Modify organization, layout, and structure of ordinance to improve clarity • General review of ordinance to identify deficiencies
• More specifically, address the following:
o Mitigation fees for the removal of native tree species – the committee will not discuss details of how to develop or implement the fees, just whether or not a mitigation fee should be required
o Tree planting requirements for single family, commercial, and industrial development projects
While not a part of the goals and objectives of this committee, as a result of this committee’s efforts, the following items may be reviewed and updated in the future:

Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - City Council Formation September 6, 2022 (5.1--Appointment-Tree Management Ordinance Update Subject: 9.4 (b) Formation of Tree Management Ordinance Update Committee and Define Goals and Objectives of the Committee

ATTACHMENT A
• Redding Municipal Code Sections 13.40 – Trees and Shrubs, and 18.41 – Off-Street Parking and Loading
• Candidate Tree List
• Landmark and Heritage Tree Plan
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - City Council Formation September 6, 2022 (5.1--Appointment-Tree Management Ordinance Update

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding’s Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2022−23 to 2027−28.

Fiscal Impact
The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is not binding, nor is it a formal budget document; therefore, it, alone, does not have direct budget implications. However, the CIP functions as a major reference tool to help in future budgeting decisions.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to adopt the CIP as proposed and provide alternative direction to staff. This will render the City of Redding (City) out of compliance with the California Government Code and may impact the collection and use of certain funds designated for capital improvement projects.

Background/Analysis
Attached for public review and consideration by the Council is the draft CIP for Fiscal Years 2022-23 to 2027-28. The CIP is a multi-year schedule of public improvements planned by the various departments of the City. It provides a general prioritization of capital improvements so that the City and the public will be able to determine with greater certainty when projects might move to construction subject to sufficient revenue collection. The draft CIP is representative of the City’s capital improvement needs based on the existing budget, the General Plan, and the individual department master plans. The CIP has several general benefits and functions that include:
• Providing a comprehensive look at the City’s projected capital and infrastructure plan.

MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Public Hearing to consider Resolution approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Redding (City).

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 559
Report to Redding City Council January 5, 2023
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan Page 2 • Assisting in forecasting workload and aiding in project coordination between departments (e.g., avoids paving a street one year and tearing it up the next year for a waterline).
• Assisting in scheduling improvements that require more than one year to construct. • Helping with long-term financial planning.
• Providing a tool for setting priorities and obtaining citizen participation in determining those priorities.
• Being an essential component in meeting the state legal requirements for public accounting of development impact fee funds.
• Helping to ensure that plans for community facilities are carried out.

On October 25, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft CIP and acted by adopting a finding of consistency with the General Plan pursuant to Sections 65103(c) and 65401 of the Government Code.

The main term for the draft CIP is for budget years 2022−23 to 2027−28. This includes the current budget year and the five subsequent years. Additional projects are also identified that are either currently unfunded or are scheduled beyond the 2027−28 fiscal year. These additional projects must be funded when needed to provide for anticipated growth based on the City’s General Plan.

The CIP contains projects from eight divisions: Airports, Community Services, Redding Electric Utility, Solid Waste, Storm Drain Utility, Streets, Wastewater Utility, and Water Utility.

Combined, the main term of the CIP contains 164 projects, totaling $602 million. The CIP includes a discussion of current facilities and services, a statement of consistency with the General Plan, and a list of projects with basic descriptions and anticipated funding sources.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. As projects advance to the design phase, from the approved CIP, environmental review will be conducted to ensure compliance with CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality and quantity of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Packet Pg. 560
Report to Redding City Council January 5, 2023
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan Page 3 Attachments
^Resolution
Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft
Packet Pg. 561
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADOPTING THE REDDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR
2022-23 to 2027-28
WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has been prepared which identifies the City’s long-term capital improvement project needs in a comprehensive and consistent format; and WHEREAS, the CIP was prepared in a format and with content that is consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 66002, which establishes requirements for the preparation of a CIP that includes projects subject to development impact fees; and WHEREAS, the CIP was reviewed by the Redding Planning Commission on October 25, 2022, and was approved as consistent with the General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65103c; and
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to allow opportunity for public comment on the draft CIP; and
WHEREAS, having satisfied the requirements of law governing preparation, content, general plan consistency, and opportunity for public review, the City Council wishes to adopt said CIP to formalize the document so it can become available for consideration in budgeting, land use planning, and accounting, among other benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding does hereby approve and adopt the Redding Capital Improvement Plan for 2022-23 to 2027-28 included herewith as Attachment "A."
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of January, 2023, and was adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
___
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: ^Resolution (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CITY OF

REDDING

CALIFORNIA
Capital Improvement Plan
2022–2027
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
2022-23
TO
2027-28
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Introduction ......................................................................................................................... A-1 B General Overview
• Division Descriptions................................................................................................ B-1 • Project Summary...................................................................................................... B-6 • Funding Overview by Division ................................................................................ B-13 • Funding Overview by Source ................................................................................. B-16 C Detailed Program Summary
• Airports..................................................................................................................... C-1 • Community Services .............................................................................................. C-12 • Redding Electric Utility ........................................................................................... C-15 • Redding Fire Department……………………………………………………….…….....C-22 • Solid Waste............................................................................................................ C-26 • Storm Drain Utility ..................................................................................................C-29 • Streets....................................................................................................................C-32 • Wastewater ............................................................................................................ C-43 • Water...................................................................................................................... C-54 • Future/Unfunded Projects....................................................................................... C-60 Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION A

INTRODUCTION
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding’s 2022-23 to 2027-28 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a five-year outlook on anticipated capital projects in the City of Redding. The City is required by Government Code 66002 to prepare and adopt a CIP. This document is used as a tool to help ensure that the City’s short- and long-term capital investments are made in the context of careful consideration of the City’s needs as well as the resources available to fund the related capital projects.

THE CIP AND GOOD PLANNING
In general, all projects have their roots in the City’s General Plan and in a particular department’s master plan or other long-range planning document. For example, the General Plan includes goals and policies related to the City’s wastewater treatment and collection system while the Wastewater Master Plan incorporates this direction, accounts for expected growth and the condition of the existing infrastructure, anticipates revenue, and identifies resulting infrastructure needs. These needs are then rolled into projects, a project delivery schedule is developed and then the projects summarized in the CIP. Section 65103c of the Government Code requires planning agencies to review the CIP for consistency with the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP on October 25, 2022, and found it consistent with the General Plan.

THE CIP AND THE CITY’S 2-YEAR BUDGET AND 10-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN The budgeting for the City’s CIP starts
with the development of the City’s 2-
year budget and 10-year
financial plan. This biennial
process includes a
combination of detailed staff
analysis and broad public
involvement. It is during this
process that basic municipal
operational and specific
infrastructure needs are
identified and matched with
revenues generated from
various local, state and federal
funding sources. This CIP is a
projected $602 million plan
with revenue from 37 different
sources that can be grouped
into eight different funding
source categories. A detailed
breakdown of the CIP funding
by funding source can be
found beginning on page B16
while a summary by funding
source category is provided
on the chart.

PROJECT FUNDING TOTALS
Airport Fund
749,063
General Fund
36,581,450
Grant
217,608,296
Impact Fees
58,119,661
Local Streets and
Roads Fund
36,658,830
PFC
19,108,993
Utility Rates
232,533,483
A-1
Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

TEAM EFFORT IN BUILDING THE CIP
The document is prepared by the Engineering Division in the Public Works Department with input from all Departments in the City. As noted above, many other commissions, community groups and partners have ongoing input into the planning and budget documents that are the foundation of the CIP. The plan includes projects from all areas in the City including, but not limited to, projects that improve the City’s streets, sewer facilities, water facilities, storm drain facilities, airports, and park facilities. The major emphasis in this CIP is rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure in the City’s five rate-funded utilities and streets program. This section contains two charts breaking out the CIP by program and each of the programs by their basic funding sources.

Airports
161,199,695.00
Community
Services
22,857,856.00
REU
64,927,570.00
RFD
25,581,450.00
Solid Waste
5,683,350.00
Storm Drain
5,519,800.00
Streets
125,455,734.00
Wastewater
114,797,584.00
Water
76,336,737.00

FUNDING TOTALS
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Airports
Community Services
REU
RFD
Solid Waste
Storm Drain
Streets
Wastewater
Water

FUNDING TYPE BY DIVISION
Airport Fund
Donation
General Fund
Grant
Impact Fees
Local Streets and Roads Fund
PFC
Utility Rates
Grant
A-2
Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CIP ORGANIZATION
The document includes a general overview followed by detailed program-by-program summaries of the entire plan.

Section B - General Overview
The general overview includes an overview of each City division contributing to the CIP, followed by a division by division summary of all projects with projected project costs (project development plus construction) and anticipated year of construction and concluding with a detailed overview of the various funding sources. The City’s CIP includes 164 projects with a projected funding need of $602 million. The funding for the five-year CIP consists of local, state and federal funding from 37 different funding sources.

Section C - Detailed Program Summaries
The detailed program summary includes an overview of the program including project by project summaries. These summaries include project descriptions, locations, funding sources, and anticipated schedule for when project development and construction funds will be needed.

Funding Legend
ATP – Active Transportation Program
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
HBP – Local Highway Bridge Program
HSIP – Highway Safety Improvement Program
PFC – Passenger Facility Charge
SRTS – Safe Routes to School
STIP – State Transportation Improvement Program
PFC – Airport Passenger Facility Charge
RRA – City of Redding as Successor Agency for the Redding Redevelopment Agency A-3
Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION B

GENERAL OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

AIRPORTS
There are two airports located within Redding. The Redding Regional Airport, located in the southeast portion of the City, is designated as a certified airport for commercial airline operations.

Benton Airpark, located close to Downtown Redding at Placer Street and Airpark Drive, is a general aviation facility which provides reliever support to the Redding Municipal Airport. Both facilities are owned and operated by the City. The availability of convenient air transportation for residents and businesses is an asset to the community and can be used as a marketing tool in the City's economic development efforts.

The 2010 Airport Master Plans outline future improvements planned for the Redding Municipal Airport and Benton Airpark. In addition to a listing of proposed improvement projects, the Master Plans identify estimated costs and general time frames (short-term, long-term, etc.) for installation of the improvements.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for both airports are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the maintenance and enhancement of our airports to provide convenient airport service for the community and strive to minimize any adverse impacts resulting from aircraft operations or airport expansion. Reference: Goals T9, T10, PF14; Policies T9F, T10A, T10C, PF14A, PF14B, and PF14C.

COMMUNITY SERVICES
The Community Services Department oversees all the programming within the park system and the development, expansion, and enhancement of the park, trail, and open-space amenities. Currently, the City of Redding owns and operates a complete range of park and recreation facilities that include 68 park sites on approximately 598 acres of land. The park system includes the smallest of neighborhood parks, large regional parks, state-of-the-art athletic facilities, and special-use facilities, e.g., boat ramps and a dog park. The Department maintains over 39 miles of trails throughout the city. The trail system has been recognized by federal and state agencies as a model. The core of the trail system is the Sacramento River Trail with many connecting trails and public open spaces.

With several large athletic facilities completed in the last decade, including the Big League Dreams Park, the Redding Aquatic Center, and the Redding Soccer Park, resources have been redirected to the development of large neighborhood parks. Currently, the Department has agreements with five subdivision developers to build neighborhood parks concurrent with the houses. Park development fee credits will fund the bulk of the construction.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed park and recreation projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which promote the improvement of park and recreation facilities Citywide. Reference: Goals R4, R11, R12, PF15; Policies (all policies listed under the noted goals).

PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Department. The Redding Police Department has the primary responsibility of providing police protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with agencies on a statewide basis. The Redding Police Department has three main divisions – Administrative Services, Field Operations, and Investigations. Officers are assigned to B-1
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) seven beats throughout the City and are dispatched to calls via radio and mobile data computer.

There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the Police Department Fire Department. The Redding Fire Department has the primary responsibility of providing fire protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) during the wildland fire season for wildland and structure fires within a one-mile fringe area surrounding the City. An automatic aid agreement with the Shasta County Fire Department is also in effect for structure fires outside the wildland fire season. Under these agreements, the Redding Fire Department responds within a onemile fringe area surrounding the City and to county islands. Shasta County Fire Department responds to a small geographic area on the east side of the City. The Redding Fire Department has three main divisions: Administration, Operations, and Fire Prevention. It operates from eight stations and a Fire Headquarters at City Hall. There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvement needs for the Fire Department.

REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY
As a California municipal corporation, the City of Redding owns, operates, and maintains power generation, transmission, and distribution facilities within the City limits. Given the investment in such facilities and a commitment to providing power at the lowest possible rates, it has historically been Redding's policy to be the sole provider of electric service within the City limits. As areas are annexed, City electric service is made available when PG&E facilities can be purchased or when service can be provided through a logical extension of the City's electric distribution system.

Redding Electric Utility (REU) presently provides service to its customers in an area approximately 61 square miles in size, with 72 miles of 115-kV transmission lines and 752 miles of overhead and underground 12-kV distribution lines. REU is proud of its record over the past year of 99.9994 percent electric service reliability (excluding the Carr Fire Damage).

To meet the demands of the changing state regulations due to wildfire and the increase of the distributed energy installations, the Electric Utility must adapt in the following ways. • Harden our existing distribution system as described in the REU Wildfire Mitigation Plan • Increase the operational efficiency of electrical system to quickly identify, track, and restore outages through the Outage Management System and workforce management tools. • Improve Communications Network to provide Operations & Engineering with real-time awareness of customer usage, circuit load, and system voltages to identify system bottlenecks.

The City of Redding filed its first comprehensive Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) with the California Energy Commission (CEC) in 2019 as required by state regulation, and will update the plan at least every five years as required. The IRP is a guidance document outlining the utility’s plan for meeting clean energy mandates and customer resource needs over the next 20 years, system upgrades needed to support load growth, managing load impacts from increased electrification adoption, and provides a framework for future resource procurements needed to support customer demands.

As the state increases the focus on carbon reduction through building and transportation electrification, the City has begun implementing policies and procedures to aid in the adoption of infrastructure supporting electrification. The City will evaluate the need to expand its electric transmission and distribution systems based on transmission system assessments and distribution B-2
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) planning studies to reliably deliver energy to its customers. In addition to securing various long- and short-term power purchase contracts, the City owns and operates 183 MW of gas-fired generation within the City Limits.

General Plan Consistency. The projects planned for the Electric Utility are consistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies, which promote programs that provide safe, reliable, and competitively priced electricity for existing and future City electric customers. Reference: REU’s 2021 Strategic Plan, 2019 Integrated Resource Plan, 2019 Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

SOLID WASTE
Solid waste generated in the City is disposed of at Shasta County's Richard W. Curry/West Central Sanitary Landfill. Under existing state permits, the landfill has sufficient capacity to accommodate the disposal of solid waste at least to the year 2030. Expansion of the facility also appears to be plausible at such time as increased capacity is warranted beyond the extent of existing permits.

Although Shasta County owns the Richard W. Curry Landfill, it has contracted with the City of Redding for the operation and management of the facility. This arrangement was formalized in 1988. All residential, commercial, and industrial refuse in Redding is collected by City personnel.

Since 1995, the City has operated its own Solid Waste Transfer Station for the transfer of Citycollected residential, commercial, and industrial refuse and the transfer of self-haul public refuse.

The facility also has the capability of processing materials collected by curbside recycling programs and contains a household hazardous waste drop-off/processing area and a composting area.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed solid waste projects are consistent with the Solid Waste Facility Master Plan and the City’s General Plan goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the efficient collection and disposal of solid waste, while maintaining an adequate waste-disposal capacity. Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF8; Policies CDD2E and PF8A.

STORM DRAINS
The Redding Planning Area contains 15 watershed basins. Public storm-drainage facilities within the City limits are operated and maintained by the City. Surrounding unincorporated areas are the responsibility of the County of Shasta. As new areas are annexed, the City assumes responsibility for stormwater management.

The City currently has a range of public and private storm-drain facilities to provide safe and efficient capture and conveyance of stormwater runoff and minimize the risks of flooding. Storm-drain facilities include more than 200 miles of storm drain pipe, more than 7,000 inlets, 1,300 outfalls and 200 miles of open channel. These systems typically outfall into natural ravines or tributaries and ultimately to the Sacramento River.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed storm-drainage projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote efforts to reduce flooding and to properly manage stormwater runoff from development. Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF9; Policies CDD2E, PF9A, PF9B, and PF9F.

B-3
Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

STREETS
Redding is both defined and constrained by its network of highways, roads, trails, railroads, and transit services that move its residents and goods in, through, and out of the community. The City is responsible for ensuring the construction and maintenance of all public streets, sidewalks, bridges, bikeways, traffic signals, and street signage within the City limits. The City also maintains a variety of Caltrans facilities consistent with the terms of various cooperative agreements. Developers are either partially or totally responsible for new street construction depending on the type and location of the project. The City uses public funds to build or improve major streets when the improvements were not constructed as part of a land development project.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for streets are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the development and maintenance of a safe and efficient public-street and bicycle-route system. Reference: Goal T3, T4, T6, T8, PF11, and PF12; Policies T3A, T3D, T4A, T4B, T6D, T6E, T8B, T8C, PF11B, PF11C, PF11D, and PF11E.

BUILDING MAINTENANCE
The Building Maintenance Division is responsible for many internal City functions including the maintenance and repair of the City's facilities such as City Hall, the Corporation Yard and the multiple Redding Fire Stations to name a few. There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the division.

WASTEWATER
The City of Redding is the sole provider of wastewater service within the City limits. The wastewater system has two major service areas, one served by the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and the other served by the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant. Facilities include: the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, initially constructed in 1966, which currently has a capacity of

9.4 million gallons per day (mgd); the Stillwater Treatment Plant, put into service in 1992, which has a capacity of 4.0 mgd; and the wastewater collection system, which has approximately 430 miles of sewer mains, 17 lift stations, and over 7,000 manholes. The wastewater system serves nearly all developed property within the City, plus a few small developments in the surrounding unincorporated area. The City provides service to more than 43,000 household equivalents. One household equivalent is the average amount of wastewater produced by an average single-family residence, which is about 240 gallons per day.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed wastewater projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which support efforts to achieve and maintain an adequate level of service in the City's sewage collection and treatment system as needed to meet existing and future needs. Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF6; Policies CDD2E, PF6A, PF6B, and PF6C.

B-4
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) WATER
The City provides water for domestic and fire-suppression uses to most of the City and to small portions of the surrounding unincorporated area. The water system is supplied by two treatment plants and well fields. Facilities include: the Foothill Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 28 million gallons per day (mgd); the Buckeye Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 14.0 mgd; the Enterprise and Cascade well systems, which have a capacity of 19.1 mgd; and the City's water distribution system, which has approximately 560 miles of water mains. The water system serves about 83 percent of the current population of Redding and about 1,800 residents in the surrounding unincorporated area. The water utility provides service to approximately 30,000 households.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed water projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which support efforts to maintain an adequate level of service in the City's water treatment and distribution system as needed to meet existing and future needs.

Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF5; Policies CDD2E, PF5A, PF5B, and PF5C.

B-5
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Airports
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
A-BEN-22-1 Runway Pavement Preservation 2022-23 $490,000 C-1 A-BEN-22-2 Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction 2023-24 $3,466,667 C-1 A-BEN-23-3 Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction 2024-25 $2,750,000 C-1 A-BEN-23-4 Rehab Parallel Taxiway A 2024-25 $380,200 C-2 A-BEN-23-5 Underground Powerline RPZ 2023-24 $45,000 C-2 A-BEN-24-4 Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction 2025-26 $4,170,000 C-2 A-BEN-25-2 Security Fencing - North RPZ 2026-27 $135,000 C-3 A-BEN-26-1 Terminal Construction Project 2027-28 $1,192,000 C-3 A-BEN-26-2 East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation 2027-28 $1,045,000 C-3 A-BEN-26-4 T-Hanger Taxiline Construction 2027-28 $750,000 C-4 A-BEN-26-5 Runway 15 Approach Tree Clearning 2027-28 $100,000 C-4 A-MUN-22-2 Terminal Assessment Study 2022-23 $500,000 C-4 A-MUN-22-5 Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase III 2022-23 $2,833,880 C-5 A-MUN-22-6 Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase IV 2022-23 $1,160,500 C-5 A-MUN-22-7 Runway 16-34 and Taxiway Connectors Rehabilitation 2024-25 $19,436,280 C-5 A-MUN-22-8 Master Plan Update 2022-23 $1,161,907 C-6
A-MUN-22-9 Master Drainage Study 2022-23 $585,204 C-6
A-MUN-23-2 Wildlife Hazard Assessment 2023-24 $150,000 C-6 A-MUN-23-3 Runway 16-34 Grading and Runway 34 REIL Modifications 2025-26 $21,206,057 C-7 A-MUN-23-4 All Weather Perimeter Road 2024-25 $1,100,000 C-7 A-MUN-23-5 Airport Access Control System 2024-25 $700,000 C-7 A-MUN-24-1 Terminal Construction Project 2024-25 $52,300,000 C-8 A-MUN-24-3 Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase II 2024-25 $18,322,000 C-8 A-MUN-24-4 Environmental Assessment 2024-25 $500,000 C-8 A-MUN-24-5 High-Speed Runway Sweeper 2024-25 $350,000 C-9 A-MUN-24-7 Pavement Preservation 2025-26 $1,120,000 C-9 A-MUN-25-1 Airport Drainage Study 2025-26 $550,000 C-9
A-MUN-25-3 Runway 17-35 Extension 2025-26 $3,000,000 C-10 A-MUN-25-4 Northwest Apron Extension 2025-26 $2,150,000 C-10 A-MUN-26-1 Parallel Runway/Taxiway 2027-28 $11,600,000 C-10 A-MUN-26-2 Expand Solar Farm - Study & Design 2027-28 $200,000 C-11 A-MUN-26-3 Perimeter Fencing 2027-28 $7,750,000 C-11
$161,199,695
B-6
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Community Services
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
CS-2005-21 Shastina Ranch Park Development 2022-23 $2,300,000 C-12 CS-2011-01 Salt Creek Heights Park 2022-23 $697,000 C-12 CS-2019-01 California Soccer Park 2022-23 $20,000 C-12
CS-2019-04 Northeast Crossing Trail (NEXT) 2022-23 $44,856 C-13 CS-2021-01 Caldwell Park Expansion Project 2022-23 $6,736,000 C-13 CS-2022-01 Panorama Park 2023-24 $10,000,000 C-13
CS-2022-02 Martin Luther King Building 2023-24 $560,000 C-14 CS-2022-03 South City Park 2022-23 $2,500,000 C-14
$22,857,856
REU
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
REU-2007-03 Electric Utility GIS Mapping (GIS Conversion) Ongoing $335,850 C-15 REU-2011-02 Corporation Yard Expansion 2022-23 $67,240 C-15 REU-2011-07 Asphalt Paving (Plant Resurfacing) 2022-23 $99,170 C-15 REU-2017-13 Next Generation Firewalls 2022-23 $70,300 C-16 REU-2017-15 Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization 2022-23 $138,000 C-16 REU-2017-16 Substation Network Upgrades 2022-23 $15,900 C-16 REU-2018-01 T3000 Upgrades 2022-23 $79,290 C-17
REU-2018-02 Remote Commercial Meter 2022-23 $261,880 C-17 REU-2019-02 Unit 5 Breaker Replacement 2022-23 $350,000 C-17 REU-2019-03 Inter-Sub Fiber Project 2022-23 $4,641,640 C-18 REU-2019-06 RPP Security Improvement 2022-23 $70,000 C-18 REU-2019-07 Unit 4 Fire System Upgrade 2022-23 $228,830 C-18 REU-2019-08 GIS Software 2022-23 $376,290 C-19
REU-2019-09 Energy Trading Modernization 2022-23 $131,490 C-19 REU-2021-01 General System Improvements 2022-23 $38,952,890 C-19 REU-2021-02 TO-TOP CIP Security Infrastructure 2022-23 $582,490 C-20 REU-2021-03 SB901 Tech Solutions 2022-23 $3,381,610 C-20 REU-2021-04 Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects 2022-23 $8,544,741 C-20 REU-2022-01 Stillwater Substation 2024-25 $6,599,960 C-21 $64,927,571
B-7
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
RFD
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
RFD-2023-05 Fire Station 5 Upgrades 2023-24 $151,000 C-22 RFD-2023-07 Fire Station 7 Upgrades 2023-24 $48,950 C-22 RFD-2023-08 Fire Station 8 Upgrades 2023-24 $33,000 C-22 RFD-2024-01 Fire Station 1 Build 2024-25 $9,900,000 C-23 RFD-2024-02 SCBA Replacement 2024-25 $1,000,000 C-23
RFD-2025-02 Fire Station 2 Upgrades 2025-26 $830,500 C-23 RFD-2025-03 Fire Station 3 Rebuild 2025-26 $5,500,000 C-24 RFD-2025-04 Fire Station 4 Upgrades 2025-26 $759,000 C-24 RFD-2025-06 Fire Station 6 Upgrages 2025-26 $759,000 C-24 RFD-2026-09 Fire Station 9 Build 2026-27 $6,600,000 C-25 $25,581,450
Solid Waste
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SW-4941-01 Transfer Station Tipping Floor 2023-24 $1,350,000 C-26 SW-4941-02 Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt Ongoing $975,000 C-26 SW-4941-03 Slurry Seal 2022-23 $177,000 C-26
SW-4941-06 Crane Repairs 2022-23 $282,000 C-27
SW-4941-08 Lift Station Retrofit 2022-23 $732,350 C-27
SW-4941-09 Organics Recycling Pilot Program 2022-23 $250,000 C-27 SW-4941-12 Administrative Office Remodel 2022-23 $117,000 C-28 SW-4941-13 Materials Recovery Facility Expansion 2023-24 $1,800,000 C-28 SW-4941-14 Marshalling Room Remodel 2023-24 $250,000 C-28 $5,933,350
Storm Drain
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SD-2027-01 Full Trash Capture Project Phase 1 2027-28 $1,500,000 C-29 SD-3515-09 Concrete Channel at Linden 2024-25 $350,000 C-29 SD-3515-15 Critical Pipe Lining Ongoing $1,800,000 C-29 SD-3525-08 Hollow Lane 2022-23 $630,000 C-30
SD-3560-03 Cypress Box Culvert 2022-23 $400,000 C-30
SD-4439-03 Hawthorne/Canby 2026-27 $300,000 C-30
SD-4439-05 Crossfire and Tarmac 2024-25 $300,000 C-31
SD-4937-01 Master Plan Update Ongoing $239,800 C-31
$5,519,800
B-8
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Streets
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
ST-2022-01 Oregon Street Sidewalk 2023-24 $1,407,310 C-32 ST-2022-02 California St Bikeway Project 2023-24 $4,140,000 C-32 ST-2023-01 Systemic Left Turns 2023-24 $1,201,000 C-32
ST-2023-02 Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting 2023-24 $849,100 C-33 ST-3520-01 Small Projects Ongoing $1,200,000 C-33
ST-3520-01-4 Traffic Calming Ongoing $300,000 C-33
ST-3572-03 Bridge Maintenance Program 2023-24 $849,999 C-34 ST-3580-01 Pavement Maintenance Ongoing $29,000,000 C-34 ST-4226-08 Canby Road Widening 2023-24 $300,000 C-34
ST-4226-09 Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout 2025-26 $4,650,000 C-35 ST-4226-10 Traffic Signal Modification 2022-23 $292,895 C-35 ST-4226-11 Loma Vista Signal 2022-23 $8,250,000 C-35
ST-4407-01 Sidewalk Replacement Ongoing $1,500,000 C-36 ST-4638-15 ADA Curb Ramps Ongoing $825,000 C-36
ST-4775-05 Turtle Bay to Downtown 2024-25 $6,550,000 C-36 ST-4775-08 Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT) 2024-25 $9,973,000 C-36 ST-4775-10 Bechelli Lane Improvements 2022-23 $11,158,618 C-37 ST-4775-12 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements 2022-23 $1,137,200 C-38 ST-4783-08 Shasta Street Railroad Crossing Improvements 2022-23 $399,719 C-38 ST-4803-01 Airport Corridor Phase II 2023-24 $1,918,350 C-38 ST-4908-04 Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek 2023-24 $4,809,000 C-39 ST-4908-05 Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek 2024-25 $3,913,000 C-39 ST-4908-06 Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2023-24 $3,865,000 C-39 ST-4908-07 Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2023-24 $2,455,000 C-40 ST-4908-08 Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2023-24 $3,900,000 C-40 ST-4908-09 Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal 2023-24 $2,142,200 C-40 ST-4908-10 Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2022-23 $4,655,676 C-41 ST-4956-04 Old Oregon Trail Widening 2023-24 $2,763,667 C-41 ST-NRTBD-01 Oasis Road Specific Plan Update 2027-28 $50,000 C-41 ST-SBP-01 Stillwater Business Park - Phase II 2023-24 $11,000,000 C-42 $125,455,734
B-9
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Wastewater
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
WW-3512-01 Infiltration and Inflow Control Ongoing $10,260,823 C-43 WW-3525-01 Lift Station Improvements Ongoing $1,812,000 C-43 WW-4086-02 Westside Interceptor - Phase III 2025-26 $10,000,000 C-43 WW-4203-02 Repair/Replace Sewer Lines Ongoing $8,936,591 C-44 WW-4703-01 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $4,079,146 C-44 WW-4801-05 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $2,719,524 C-44 WW-4801-10 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase I/II 2024-25 $7,250,000 C-45 WW-4801-11 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase III/IV 2027-28 $11,750,000 C-45 WW-LS-CC-04 North Market Lift Station 2025-26 $580,685 C-45 WW-P-CC-01 Lake Redding Interceptor I 2026-27 $4,975,000 C-46 WW-P-CC-28 Woodacre Drive 2022-23 $1,250,000 C-46
WW-P-CC-4 Buenaventura Sewer 2026-27 $3,950,000 C-46
WW-P-CC-5 Mercury Drive 2027-28 $1,450,000 C-47
WW-P-CC-8-9 Sulphur Creek 2025-26 $2,931,430 C-47
WW-P-S-01 Oasis Road 2025-26 $414,290 C-47
WW-P-S-06 Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase I 2022-23 $6,400,000 C-48 WW-P-S-07 Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase II 2025-26 $7,000,000 C-48 WW-P-S-08 Magnums Area Sewer 2023-24 $3,700,000 C-48
WW-P-S-09 Tehama Sewer 2023-24 $2,600,000 C-49
WW-P-S-10 Center Sewer 2023-24 $1,150,000 C-49
WW-P-S-11 Mary Lake Sewer 2024-25 $2,150,000 C-49
WW-P-S-12 Lake Keswick 2023-24 $3,550,000 C-50
WW-P-S-13 Upper Buenaventura Sewer 2024-25 $1,250,000 C-50 WW-P-S-14 Lakeside Sewer 2024-25 $1,750,000 C-50
WW-TP-C-06 Influent Screening 2024-25 $2,000,000 C-51
WW-TP-C-07 Clear Creek Electrical Maintenance 2023-24 $500,000 C-51 WW-TP-C-3 Clear Creek Pond Upgrades 2027-28 $3,413,095 C-51 WW-TP-C-4 Power Upgrade to Outfall 2022-23 $225,000 C-52 WW-TP-C-5 Hypo Project 2022-23 $500,000 C-52
WW-TP-P-13 Bisulfite Project 2022-23 $250,000 C-52
WW-TP-S-6 Sludge Lagoons & Drying Beds 2024-25 $6,000,000 C-53 $114,797,584
B-10
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Water
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
W-3020-01-02 Pump Station Improvements Ongoing $1,543,756 C-54 W-3020-04 Pump House 1 Replacement Environmental 2024-25 $1,560,315 C-54 W-4286-01 Replace Water Mains Ongoing $33,180,640 C-54
W-4286-19 Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Masonic 2022-23 $5,500,000 C-55 W-4286-28 18" Masonic to Hilltop 2024-25 $2,223,105 C-55 W-4338-02-03 Well Rehabilitation Ongoing $861,358 C-55
W-4338-04 Well Head Treatment System Ongoing $2,873,000 C-56 W-4338-05 Install Oxidation/Filtration at EW-14 2025-26 $4,035,690 C-56 W-4338-06 Rehab EW-11 or Construct New Well 2024-25 $3,550,457 C-56 W-4492-01 Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $7,092,658 C-57 W-4600-02 Cypress Avenue Booster Pump Station Ongoing $2,750,610 C-57 W-4606-01 Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $1,518,768 C-57 W-4795-03 Hill 900 Reservoir 2024-25 $4,811,726 C-58
W-4795-04-05 Reservoir Improvements Ongoing $1,975,000 C-58 W-CONV-01 Beltline 20" - Oasis to Mountain Lakes 2024-25 $658,258 C-58 W-CONV-02 Oasis 20" - UPRR to Beltline 2024-25 $1,231,962 C-59 W-CONV-03 Oasis 20" - Calexico to A6-V1 2024-25 $969,434 C-59 $76,336,737
B-11
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Airports
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Airport Fund $36,117 $204,061 $171,875 $212,025 $33,660 $91,325 $749,063 Federal FAA Grant $6,366,442 $4,207,650 $63,994,912 $44,940,155 $1,820,040 $19,306,920 $140,636,119 PFC $8,730,329 $94,334 $4,134,588 $4,272,402 $130,760 $1,746,580 $19,108,993 State Aviation Grant $29,550 $214,155 $140,625 $173,475 $27,540 $120,175 $705,520 $15,162,438 $4,720,200 $68,442,000 $49,598,057 $2,012,000 $21,265,000 $161,199,695 Total Community Services
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total ARPA Grant $2,515,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,060,000
Local Donations $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
McConnell Foundation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Park Development Fees $2,897,000 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,517,000 REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
State Park Grant $2,044,856 $5,436,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $15,280,856 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,456,856 $7,601,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $22,857,856 Total REU
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Electric Rates $17,593,878 $10,394,378 $13,834,325 $8,847,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $64,927,571 $17,593,878 $10,394,378 $13,834,325 $8,847,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $64,927,571 Total RFD
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total General Fund $0 $1,222,950 $10,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $0 $1,222,950 $10,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000
$0 $25,581,450
$0 $25,581,450 Total
B-12
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Solid Waste
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Solid Waste Rates/Fees $1,548,350 $2,650,000 $440,000 $0 $170,000 $1,125,000 $5,933,350 $1,548,350 $2,650,000 $440,000 $0 $170,000 $1,125,000 $5,933,350 Total Storm Drain
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Storm Drain Connection Fees $89,800 $150,000 $0 $300,000 $70,000 $2,080,000 $2,689,800 Storm Drain Rates $1,330,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $2,830,000 $1,419,800 $450,000 $300,000 $600,000 $370,000 $2,380,000 $5,519,800 Total B-13
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Streets
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total AHSC Grant $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,000
ARPA $500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Dana Drive Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Federal ATP Grant $6,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,740,000
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal EDA Grant $0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
Federal Grant $810,000 $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,442,000 Federal HBP Grant $8,124,631 $11,960,442 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,885,073 Federal HSIP Grant $1,194,260 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,597,500 General Fund $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Impact Fees $292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Local Streets and Roads Fund $4,351,918 $6,510,912 $3,806,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $24,658,830 North Redding Traffic Benefit
District Fees
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
REU Tran $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
RRA Successor $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 State ATP Grant $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000 State CPUC Grant $399,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,719
State Grant $332,055 $1,589,454 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,921,509
Traffic Impact Fees $9,611,750 $2,142,688 $400,000 $4,350,000 $200,000 $200,000 $16,904,438 Waste Water $423,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $423,770
Water $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $38,310,998 $37,626,736 $28,503,000 $9,755,000 $5,605,000 $5,655,000 $125,455,734 B-14
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Wastewater
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Connection Fees $0 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,700,000
Wastewater Connection Fees $6,725,000 $0 $4,056,829 $2,956,532 $2,561,050 $10,677,224 $26,976,635 Wastewater Rates $15,628,913 $19,442,580 $15,544,235 $11,225,283 $11,733,787 $10,546,151 $84,120,949 Total $22,353,913 $23,142,580 $19,601,064 $14,181,815 $14,294,837 $21,223,375 $114,797,584 Water
Potential Funding Sources 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Water Connection Fees $1,375,000 $569,450 $744,443 $0 $0 $0 $2,688,893 Water Rates $31,507,498 $9,367,111 $9,828,286 $9,261,060 $6,006,806 $7,677,083 $73,647,844 $32,882,498 $9,936,561 $10,572,729 $9,261,060 $6,006,806 $7,677,083 $76,336,737 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

B-15
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Airport Fund
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Airport Fund $36,117 $204,061 $171,875 $212,025 $33,660 $91,325 $749,063 $36,117 $204,061 $171,875 $212,025 $33,660 $91,325 $749,063 Total General Fund
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total $1,000,000 $6,222,950 $15,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $0 $36,581,450 $1,000,000 $6,222,950 $15,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $0 $36,581,450 General Fund
Total
Grant
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,000
$500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
$2,515,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,060,000
$6,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,740,000
$75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 $0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
$6,366,442 $4,207,650 $63,994,912 $44,940,155 $1,820,040 $19,306,920 $140,636,119 $810,000 $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $9,442,000
$8,124,631 $11,960,442 $3,800,000
$0
$0 $0 $0 $23,885,073
$1,194,260 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,597,500
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$300,000 $0
$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
$29,550 $214,155 $140,625 $173,475 $27,540 $120,175 $705,520 $399,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,719
$332,055 $1,589,454 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,921,509
$2,044,856 $5,436,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $15,280,856 $30,636,513 $32,125,941 $84,432,537 $49,188,630 $2,722,580 $19,502,095 $218,608,296 AHSC Grant
ARPA
ARPA Grant
Federal ATP Grant
Federal CDBG Grant
Federal EDA Grant
Federal FAA Grant
Federal Grant
Federal HBP Grant
Federal HSIP Grant
McConnell Foundation Grant
RRA Successor
State ATP Grant
State Aviation Grant
State CPUC Grant
State Grant
State Park Grant
Total
B-16
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Impact Fees
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Connection Fees $0 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,700,000
Dana Drive Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Impact Fees $292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Fees
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Park Development Fees $2,897,000 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,517,000 Storm Drain Connection Fees $89,800 $150,000 $0 $300,000 $70,000 $2,080,000 $2,689,800 Traffic Impact Fees $9,611,750 $2,142,688 $400,000 $4,350,000 $200,000 $200,000 $16,904,438 Wastewater Connection Fees $6,725,000 $0 $4,056,829 $2,956,532 $2,561,050 $10,677,224 $26,976,635 Water Connection Fees $1,375,000 $569,450 $744,443 $0 $0 $0 $2,688,893 $21,041,445 $8,432,138 $5,201,272 $7,606,532 $2,831,050 $13,007,224 $58,119,661 Total Local Streets and Roads Fund
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total $4,351,918 $6,510,912 $3,806,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $24,658,830 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 $6,351,918 $8,510,912 $5,806,000 $5,330,000 $5,330,000 $5,330,000 $36,658,830 Local Streets and Roads Fund
SB1 RMRA
Total
PFC
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total PFC $8,730,329
$8,730,329
$94,334 $4,134,588 $4,272,402
$94,334 $4,134,588 $4,272,402
$130,760 $1,746,580 $19,108,993
$130,760 $1,746,580 $19,108,993 Total
B-17
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Utility Rates
Funding Source 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total Electric Rates $17,593,878 $10,394,378 $13,834,325 $8,847,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $64,927,571 REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
REU Tran $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $1,548,350 $2,650,000 $440,000 $0 $170,000 $1,125,000 $5,933,350 Storm Drain Rates $1,330,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $2,830,000 Waste Water $423,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $423,770
Wastewater Rates $15,628,913 $19,442,580 $15,544,235 $11,225,283 $11,733,787 $10,546,151 $84,120,949 Water $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Water Rates $31,507,498 $9,367,111 $9,828,286 $9,261,060 $6,006,806 $7,677,083 $73,647,844 $68,932,409 $42,154,069 $39,946,846 $29,633,673 $25,339,423 $26,777,064 $232,783,484 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

Total $136,728,73 $97,744,405 $155,153,118 $104,201,762 $42,327,473 $66,454,288 $602,609,777 B-18
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION C

DETAILED PROGRAM

SUMMARIES
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway Pavement Preservation
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain runway and replace runway markings.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$490,000
$490,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-22-1
Airport Fund $26,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,950
Federal FAA Grant $441,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $441,000
State Aviation Grant $22,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,050
Total $490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000
$490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000
Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction
This project includes the reconstruction of 16,000 square yards of taxilanes on the eastside of Benton Airpark. These taxilanes are deteriorated and are needed to access City-owned t-hangars.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,466,667
$3,466,667
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-22-2
Airport Fund $9,167 $181,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,667
Federal FAA Grant $150,000 $2,970,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,120,000 State Aviation Grant $7,500 $148,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $156,000 Total $166,667 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,466,667
Project Development $166,667 $166,667
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,300,000
$166,667 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,466,667
Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$2,750,000
$2,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-3
Airport Fund $0 $17,050 $134,200 $0 $0 $0 $151,250
Federal FAA Grant $0 $279,000 $2,196,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,475,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $13,950 $109,800 $0 $0 $0 $123,750 Total $0 $310,000 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,750,000
Project Development $0 $310,000
Construction
Total
$310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,440,000
$0 $310,000 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,750,000
C-1
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Rehab Parallel Taxiway A
Description: The eastside taxiway at Benton Airpark is in need of rehabilitation.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$380,200
$380,200
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-4
Airport Fund $0 $3,036 $17,875 $0 $0 $0 $20,911
Federal FAA Grant $0 $2,484 $292,500 $0 $0 $0 $294,984
State Aviation Grant $0 $49,680 $14,625 $0 $0 $0 $64,305 Total $0 $55,200 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $380,200
Project Development $0 $55,200
Construction
Total
$55,200 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000
$0 $55,200 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $380,200
Underground Powerline RPZ
Description: Installing underground powerline under runway protection zone.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$45,000
$45,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-5
Airport Fund $0 $2,475 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,475
Federal FAA Grant $0 $40,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,500
State Aviation Grant $0 $2,025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,025
Total $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
$0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$4,170,000
$4,170,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-24-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $19,800 $209,550 $0 $0 $229,350
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $324,000 $3,429,000 $0 $0 $3,753,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $16,200 $171,450 $0 $0 $187,650 Total $0 $0 $360,000 $3,810,000 $0 $0 $4,170,000
Project Development $0 $360,000
Construction
Total
$0 $360,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,810,000 $0 $0 $3,810,000
$0 $0 $360,000 $3,810,000 $0 $0 $4,170,000
C-2
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Security Fencing - North RPZ
Description: Installing security fencing around North Runway Protection Zone Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$135,000
$135,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-25-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $2,475 $4,950 $0 $7,425
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $40,500 $81,000 $0 $121,500
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $2,025 $4,050 $0 $6,075
Total $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $90,000 $0 $135,000
Project Development $0 $45,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $90,000
$0 $0 $0 $45,000 $90,000 $0 $135,000
Terminal Construction Project
Description: Construction of new terminal.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$1,192,000
$1,192,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-1
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,310 $2,500 $15,810
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $217,800 $900,000 $1,117,800 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,890 $47,500 $58,390 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $950,000 $1,192,000
Project Development $0 $242,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $242,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $950,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $950,000 $1,192,000
East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation
Description: Rehabilitation of pavement.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$1,045,000
$1,045,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,225 $52,250 $57,475
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,500 $855,000 $940,500 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,275 $42,750 $47,025 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $950,000 $1,045,000
Project Development $0 $95,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $95,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $950,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $950,000 $1,045,000
C-3
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
T-Hanger Taxiline Construction
Description: Construction of taxiline to T-hanger.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$750,000
$750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,675 $36,575 $41,250
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,500 $598,500 $675,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,825 $29,925 $33,750 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $665,000 $750,000
Project Development $0 $85,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $85,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $665,000 $665,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $665,000 $750,000
Runway 15 Approach Tree Clearning
Description: Improvements/maintenance - Runway 15
Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$100,000
$100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-5
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,500 $0 $5,500
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $90,000
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500 $0 $4,500
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Terminal Assessment Study
Description: Assessment for new terminal.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-2
PFC $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $500,000 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
C-4
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase III Construction of terminal access road connecting Woodrum Circle, Knighton Road, Flight Avenue, and Municipal Boulevard.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$2,833,880
$2,833,880
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-5
Federal FAA Grant $2,569,196 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,569,196
PFC $264,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $264,684
Total $2,833,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,833,880
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,833,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,833,880
$2,833,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,833,880
Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase IV
Construction of terminal access road connecting Woodrum Circle, Knighton Road, Flight Avenue, and Municipal Boulevard.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,160,500
$1,160,500
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-6
Federal FAA Grant $1,052,109 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,052,109
PFC $108,391 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,391
Total $1,160,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,160,500
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,160,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,160,500
$1,160,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,160,500
Runway 16-34 and Taxiway Connectors Rehabilitation
Description: Design phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and MAGVAR for runways Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$19,436,280
$19,436,280
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-7
Federal FAA Grant $1,010,140 $0 $16,610,725 $0 $0 $0 $17,620,865 PFC $104,140 $0 $1,711,275 $0 $0 $0 $1,815,415
Total $1,114,280 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $0 $19,436,280
Project Development $1,114,280 $1,114,280
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $0 $18,322,000
$1,114,280 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $0 $19,436,280
C-5
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Master Plan Update
Airport Layout Plan Update & Narrative Report, inlcuding an Aeronautical AGIS Survey, Terminal Expansion Study, Energy Audit Assessment, Environmental Surveys, and Land Use Analysis Study.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,161,907
$1,161,907
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-8
Federal FAA Grant $1,008,007 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,008,007
PFC $153,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,900
Total $1,161,907 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,161,907
Project Development $1,161,907 $1,161,907
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,161,907 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,161,907
Master Drainage Study
Description: Comprehensive airport property analysis for future build outs.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$585,204
$585,204
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-9
PFC $585,204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $585,204
Total $585,204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $585,204
Project Development $585,204 $585,204
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$585,204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $585,204
Wildlife Hazard Assessment
Description: Wildlife hazard assessment and wildlife hazard management plan development.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$150,000
$150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-2
Federal FAA Grant $135,990 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,990
PFC $14,010 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,010
Total $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Project Development $150,000 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
C-6
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway 16-34 Grading and Runway 34 REIL Modifications
Design and Construction for Runway 16-34 RSA Grading, Shoulder, and Drainage Improvements, Runway 34 REIL Modifications, and Electrical Improvements.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$21,206,057
$21,206,057
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $825,006 $0 $18,400,405 $0 $0 $19,225,411 PFC $0 $84,994 $0 $1,895,652 $0 $0 $1,980,646
Total $0 $910,000 $0 $20,296,057 $0 $0 $21,206,057
Project Development $0 $910,000
Construction
Total
$910,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $20,296,057 $0 $0 $20,296,057
$0 $910,000 $0 $20,296,057 $0 $0 $21,206,057
All Weather Perimeter Road
Design and Construction for perimeter road needed for vehicles transitioning from N to S side of airfield. Necessary to prevent FOD and to be undistributed after hazardous weather conditions.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,100,000
$1,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $90,660 $906,600 $0 $0 $0 $997,260 PFC $0 $9,340 $93,400 $0 $0 $0 $102,740
Total $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
Project Development $0 $100,000
Construction
Total
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
Airport Access Control System
Description: Brand new system installed for performing necessary badging procedures as required by TSA.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$700,000
$700,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-5
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $67,995 $566,625 $0 $0 $634,620 PFC $0 $0 $7,005 $58,375 $0 $0 $65,380
Total $0 $0 $75,000 $625,000 $0 $0 $700,000
Project Development $0 $75,000
Construction
Total
$0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $625,000 $0 $0 $625,000
$0 $0 $75,000 $625,000 $0 $0 $700,000
C-7
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Terminal Construction Project
Description: Brand new system installed for performing necessary badging procedures as required by TSA.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$52,300,000
$52,300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $43,035,000 $0 $0 $0 $43,035,000 PFC $7,000,000 $0 $2,265,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,265,000
Total $7,000,000 $0 $45,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $52,300,000
Project Development $7,000,000 $7,000,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $45,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,300,000
$7,000,000 $0 $45,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $52,300,000
Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase II
Description: Construction phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and initial electrical.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$18,322,000
$18,322,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $16,610,725 $0 $0 $16,610,725 PFC $0 $0 $0 $1,711,275 $0 $0 $1,711,275
Total $0 $0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $18,322,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $18,322,000
$0 $0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $18,322,000
Environmental Assessment
Description: Parallel Runway 4,000 x 47 feet with a visual approach.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $453,300 $0 $0 $453,300
PFC $0 $0 $0 $46,700 $0 $0 $46,700
Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
C-8
Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
High-Speed Runway Sweeper
Description: Purchase of high-speed runway sweeper.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-5
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $317,310 $0 $0 $0 $317,310
PFC $0 $0 $32,690 $0 $0 $0 $32,690
Total $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pavement Preservation
Description: Design and Construction for pavement preservation project.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,120,000
$1,120,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-7
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $108,792 $906,600 $0 $0 $1,015,392 PFC $0 $0 $11,208 $93,400 $0 $0 $104,608
Total $0 $0 $120,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,120,000
Project Development $0 $120,000
Construction
Total
$0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $0 $120,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,120,000
Airport Drainage Study
Comprehensive analysis of airport outfall system including runway safety areas to verify proper drainage on the airfield.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$550,000
$550,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $498,630 $0 $498,630
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,370 $0 $51,370
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $550,000
Project Development $0 $550,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $550,000
C-9
Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway 17-35 Extension
Description: Environmental Assessment and Design for Runway Extension, including Parallel Taxiway and Connectors.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $2,719,800 $0 $0 $2,719,800
PFC $0 $0 $0 $280,200 $0 $0 $280,200
Total $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Project Development $0 $3,000,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Northwest Apron Extension
Description: Extension of Apron for transient parking and added relief for fire fighting operations as needed.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$2,150,000
$2,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $135,990 $1,813,200 $0 $0 $1,949,190 PFC $0 $0 $14,010 $186,800 $0 $0 $200,810
Total $0 $0 $150,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,150,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$0 $0 $150,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,150,000
Parallel Runway/Taxiway
Description: Parallel Runway/Taxiway includes New Electrical Vault - 4,000 x 47 feet with a visual approach.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$11,600,000
$11,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,300 $10,063,260 $10,516,560 PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,700 $1,036,740 $1,083,440
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $11,100,000 $11,600,000
Project Development $0 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,100,000 $11,100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $11,100,000 $11,600,000
C-10
Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Expand Solar Farm - Study & Design
Plan to expand solar farm that currently exists at the airport to reduce carbon foot print and energy costs with expansion of airport and future development.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$200,000
$200,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-2
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,660 $90,660 $181,320
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,340 $9,340 $18,680
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Project Development $0 $200,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Perimeter Fencing
Description: Design and construction for perimeter access control system/wildlife mitigation fencing.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$7,750,000
$7,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,650 $6,799,500 $7,026,150 PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,350 $700,500 $723,850
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $7,500,000 $7,750,000
Project Development $0 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $7,500,000 $7,750,000
C-11
Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Shastina Ranch Park Development
Construct 7-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in a soon-to-be developed subdivision.

Includes a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, and trail connections to adjacent public open-space areas.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
SE Quadrant, Rancho Road/Shasta View Drive
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$900,000
$2,300,000
$3,200,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2005-21
Park Development Fees $1,800,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000 Total $1,800,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
Project Development $300,000 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$1,800,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
Salt Creek Heights Park
Design and construction of 8-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in a soon-to-be-developed subdivision. The project will include a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, trail connections, and a restroom.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
SW Quadrant, off Eureka Way
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$903,000
$697,000
$1,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2011-01
Park Development Fees $577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000 Total $577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
$577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
California Soccer Park
Replace four synthetic turf fields at the existing athletic facility and install additional shade structures. The artificial turf and the underlying drainage system installed during the Park's construction were defective.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
NE Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Improvement
$5,130,000
$20,000
$5,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-01
McConnell Foundation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Park Development Fees $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Total $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
C-12
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Northeast Crossing Trail (NEXT)
Create 2,900 feet of bicycle path linking to existing non-motorized trails and the City's commercial core. Includes the installation of bridge crossing over Boulder Creek and LED lighting along the trail, planting of 60 trees and temporary irrigation.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
NE Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$1,301,160
$44,856
$1,346,016
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-04
State Park Grant $44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
Total $44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
$44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
Caldwell Park Expansion Project
A grant funded expansion and improvement of Caldwell Park, featuring a new bike park, expanded skate park, lighting, and parking. Project also includes a new restroom, exercise equipment, shade structures and public art.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
NW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$6,736,000
$6,736,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2021-01
State Park Grant $2,000,000 $4,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,736,000 Total $2,000,000 $4,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,736,000
Project Development $400,000 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,600,000 $4,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,336,000
$2,000,000 $4,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,736,000
Panorama Park
Grant funded project on dedicated land and recreation facility. Includes construction of trails, landscaping, playground and parking.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Lake Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$10,000,000
$10,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-01
Park Development Fees $500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 State Park Grant $0 $700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $8,500,000 Total $500,000 $1,700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $10,000,000 Project Development $500,000 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $9,500,000 $500,000 $1,700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $10,000,000 C-13
Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Martin Luther King Building
Description: Remodel of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Building.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$560,000
$560,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-02
ARPA Grant $15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
Total $15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
Project Development $15,000 $15,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $545,000
$15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
South City Park
Description: Revilatization of South City Park with new design and construction.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-03
ARPA Grant $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Total $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Project Development $250,000 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250,000
$2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
C-14
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Electric Utility GIS Mapping (GIS Conversion)
Converting REU’s existing linear based drawing data into an information-based system, including acquiring necessary data platforms and the conversion of the existing data into GIS.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,423,270
$335,850
$1,759,120
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2007-03
Electric Rates $335,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $335,850
Total $335,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $335,850
Corporation Yard Expansion
Required to construct a distribution dispatch center for both organizational efficiencies and as mandated by FERC and NERC regulatory requirements.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
20055 Viking Way
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Expansion
$184,283
$67,240
$251,523
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2011-02
Electric Rates $67,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,240
Total $67,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,240
Asphalt Paving (Plant Resurfacing)
Addition of concrete or asphalt surfaces to areas of the plant enhances plant safety, cleanliness, and ease of operation.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$50,831
$99,170
$150,001
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2011-07
Electric Rates $99,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,170
Total $99,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,170
C-15
Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Next Generation Firewalls
Purchase and install next generation firewalls at power control center and Avtech to segment the operational network data from business data.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road/3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$49,696
$70,300
$119,996
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-13
Electric Rates $70,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,300
Total $70,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,300
Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization
The controls for this substation are part of a System wide substation control modernization project. Replacement of SCADA equipment manufactured by C3-Ilex and control panels that utilize obsolete mechanical protective relays.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$138,000
$138,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-15
Electric Rates $138,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000
Total $138,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000
Substation Network Upgrades
Annual update to lifecycle operational computers and network equipment. Substations currently need upgrades to Subnet Solutions computers running Windows XP to eliminate the security risks.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$10,051
$15,900
$25,951
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-16
Electric Rates $15,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,900
Total $15,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,900
C-16
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
T3000 Upgrades
Software updgrades to the T3000 system, an SEI distributed controls system (DCS) software and hardware product, to operate and monitor the Redding Power Plant generating units.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$397,744
$79,290
$477,034
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2018-01
Electric Rates $79,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,290
Total $79,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,290
Remote Commercial Meter
Installation of 1700 electric revenue meters to increase the number of system data points feeding into the Outage Management System and Distribution Management System providing the SO's critical information, improving outage response and restoration time.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,344,587
$261,880
$1,606,467
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2018-02
Electric Rates $261,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,880
Total $261,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,880
Unit 5 Breaker Replacement
Description: Replace generator breaker with better system.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-02
Electric Rates $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Total $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
C-17
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Inter-Sub Fiber Project
Description: Installing fiber from Redding Power to Moore Rd, Moore Rd to Waldon, and Waldon to Oregon.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$458,365
$4,641,640
$5,100,005
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-03
Electric Rates $1,441,640 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,641,640 Total $1,441,640 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,641,640 RPP Security Improvement
Modificaiton of front gate to incorporate an entrance and exit gate, relocation of guard shack to the center of the driveway with a new floor plan, and add Cardlock type locks to buildings in the plant site that hold controls or other sensitive equipment.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$70,000
$70,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-06
Electric Rates $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Total $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Unit 4 Fire System Upgrade
Description: Creating working space after removal of steam boilers.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$11,178
$228,830
$240,008
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-07
Electric Rates $228,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,830
Total $228,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,830
C-18
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
GIS Software
Description: Project to allow for a GIS software application upgrade and development of new distribution utility network.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$11,224
$376,290
$387,514
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-08
Electric Rates $376,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $376,290
Total $376,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $376,290
Energy Trading Modernization
Description: Ongoing internal costs to maintain software requested for energy trading modernization project.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,138,522
$131,490
$1,270,012
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-09
Electric Rates $131,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $131,490
Total $131,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $131,490
General System Improvements
General system improvements including the installation of transformers, capacitor banks, poles, overhead and underground conductors and switches, splices/connectors, conduit, splice boxes and vaults.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-01
Electric Rates $8,102,890 $6,050,000 $6,050,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $38,952,890 Total $8,102,890 $6,050,000 $6,050,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $38,952,890 C-19
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
TO-TOP CIP Security Infrastructure
CIP Security Equipment including Physical Access, Cyber-Servers, and Network Upgrades to PCC and Backup PCC Facility.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$167,520
$582,490
$750,010
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2021-02
Electric Rates $582,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,490
Total $582,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,490
SB901 Tech Solutions
Technology implementation to minimize sources of ignition, manage vegetation within the City’s electric grid, harden systems, more effectively protect and notify the public if an issue arises, as well as shorten response and recovery time.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$7,506,018
$3,381,610
$10,887,628
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2021-03
Electric Rates $3,381,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,381,610
Total $3,381,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,381,610
Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects
Description: Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-04
Electric Rates $1,261,048 $1,844,378 $2,084,325 $1,597,330 $878,830 $878,830 $8,544,741 Total $1,261,048 $1,844,378 $2,084,325 $1,597,330 $878,830 $878,830 $8,544,741 C-20
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Stillwater Substation
Future development plans on the east side of Redding necessitate REU building a new substation. Addresses system capability and service reliability as Redding adds new load.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Venture Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$42
$6,599,960
$6,600,002
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2022-01
Electric Rates $599,960 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $6,599,960 Total $599,960 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $6,599,960 C-21
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 5 Upgrades
Upgrades to Fire Station #5, including exterior paint, PPE containment, generator relocation and the remodel of the Battalion Chief Quarters.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
955 Hartnell Ave
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$151,000
$151,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-05
General Fund $0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Total $0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
$0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Fire Station 7 Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to Fire Station #7, including exterior paint, PPE containment, new counter tops and water filtration system.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3772 Flight Ave
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$48,950
$48,950
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-07
General Fund $0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
Total $0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
$0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
Fire Station 8 Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to Fire Station #8, including exterior paint and PPE containment Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
131 Churn Creek Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$33,000
$33,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-08
General Fund $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
Total $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
$0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
C-22
Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 1 Build
Description: New build of 12,000 sq. ft. Fire Station.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
1335 Shasta St
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$9,900,000
$9,900,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-01
General Fund $0 $990,000 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000 Total $0 $990,000 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000
Project Development $0 $990,000
Construction
Total
$990,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,910,000
$0 $990,000 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000
SCBA Replacement
Description: New self contained breathing apparatus units for fire stations.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
All Fire Stations
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-02
General Fund $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Total $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fire Station 2 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and expansion of Fire Station #2, including adding 2,000 square feet, exterior paint and a generator.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3491 Placer St
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$830,500
$830,500
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-02
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $830,500 $0 $0 $830,500
Total $0 $0 $0 $830,500 $0 $0 $830,500
Project Development $0 $83,050
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $83,050 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $747,450 $0 $0 $747,450
$0 $0 $0 $830,500 $0 $0 $830,500
C-23
Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 3 Rebuild
Description: Rebuild of Fire Station #3.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
4255 Westside Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$5,500,000
$5,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-03
General Fund $0 $0 $550,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000 Total $0 $0 $550,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000
Project Development $0 $550,000
Construction
Total
$0 $550,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $4,950,000
$0 $0 $550,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000
Fire Station 4 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #4.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2605 S Bonnyview Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$759,000
$759,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-04
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Project Development $0 $75,900
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $75,900 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $683,100 $0 $0 $683,100
$0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Fire Station 6 Upgrages
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #6.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
1695 Beltline Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$759,000
$759,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-06
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Project Development $0 $75,900
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $75,900 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $683,100 $0 $0 $683,100
$0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
C-24
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 9 Build
Description: Build new Fire Station on East side.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
East Side
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$6,600,000
$6,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2026-09
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $660,000 $5,940,000 $0 $6,600,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $660,000 $5,940,000 $0 $6,600,000
Project Development $0 $660,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $660,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $5,940,000 $0 $5,940,000
$0 $0 $0 $660,000 $5,940,000 $0 $6,600,000
C-25
Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Transfer Station Tipping Floor
The tipping floor is subject to use by heavy equipment and garbage trucks and wears down over time, requiring periodic resurfacing.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $1,350,000 Total $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $1,350,000
Project Development $0 $135,000
Construction
Total
$60,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
$0 $540,000 $0 $0 $0 $675,000 $1,215,000
$0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $1,350,000
Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt
The asphalt within the facility is over 18 years old and failing due to aging and daily use by heavy equipment and trucks.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-02
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $250,000 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $975,000 Total $250,000 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $975,000
Project Development $25,000 $97,500
Construction
Total
$0 $35,000 $0 $0 $37,500
$225,000 $0 $315,000 $0 $0 $337,500 $877,500
$250,000 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $975,000
Slurry Seal
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain the driveways within the Transfer and Recycling Facility.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-03
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $102,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $177,000 Total $102,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $177,000
Project Development $10,200 $17,700
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $7,500 $0
$91,800 $0 $0 $0 $67,500 $0 $159,300
$102,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $177,000
C-26
Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Crane Repairs
The crane is used to adjust loads in the transfer trailers prior to hauling to the landfill. Crane repairs cover the cost of replacing parts due to daily wear and tear on the machine.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-06
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $97,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $282,000 Total $97,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $282,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Lift Station Retrofit
Description: To increase stormwater handling capacity.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$347,000
$732,350
$1,079,350
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-08
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $732,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $732,350 Total $732,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $732,350
Project Development $146,470 $146,470
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$585,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $585,880
$732,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $732,350
Organics Recycling Pilot Program
Pilot program consisting of de-bagger and grinder to prepare material to inter the Wastewater System. Future implementation of organics recycling beyond the pilot project is estimated to be a multi-million dollar project. Data on cost and timeline TBD.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-09
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Total $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Project Development $250,000 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
C-27
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Administrative Office Remodel
Description: Remodel administrative building to create additional workspace for growing staff.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$117,000
$117,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-12
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Total $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Project Development $11,700 $11,700
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$105,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,300
$117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Materials Recovery Facility Expansion
Description: Replacement of sorting screens and conveyor belts to update machine and improve processing capacity.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-13
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 Total $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
$0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
Marshalling Room Remodel
Extensive remodel of both the men and women’s bathroom facilities increasing the size of the men’s restroom by removing walls and relocating plumbing and electrical.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-14
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Total $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Project Development $0 $25,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
$0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
C-28
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Full Trash Capture Project Phase 1
Description: Installation of full trash capture devices in storm drain system to comply with state mandates.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-2027-01
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Concrete Channel at Linden
Description: Install concrete box culvert or open channel similar to downstream portion.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Linden Avenue from S. Market to Favretto
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3515-09
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $280,000 $350,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $280,000 $350,000
Project Development $0 $70,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $280,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $280,000 $350,000
Critical Pipe Lining
Description: Critical pipe lining at various locations throughout the City.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3515-15
Storm Drain Rates $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Total $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Project Development $30,000 $180,000
Construction
Total
$30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
$270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $1,620,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 C-29
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Hollow Lane
Description: Remove existing undersized pipes and replace with arch culvert.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Hollow Lane
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$195,804
$630,000
$825,804
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3525-08
Storm Drain Rates $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000
Total $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000
$630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000
Cypress Box Culvert
Description: Remove and replace existing box culvert.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
E Cypress
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$42,195
$400,000
$442,195
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3560-03
Storm Drain Rates $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Total $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Hawthorne/Canby
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales and ditches.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Hawthorne and Canby
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$300,000
$300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-4439-03
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
Project Development $0 $45,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $255,000 $255,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
C-30
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Crossfire and Tarmac
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Crossfire and Tarmac
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$300,000
$300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-4439-05
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Development $0 $45,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $255,000
$0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Master Plan Update
Description: Development of a new Master Plan to address the current regulatory environment and needs of the utility.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$19,483
$239,800
$259,283
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-4937-01
Storm Drain Connection Fees $89,800 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,800 Total $89,800 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,800
Project Development $89,800 $239,800
Construction
Total
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$89,800 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,800
C-31
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Oregon Street Sidewalk
Extend concrete box culvert for Calaboose Creek along Oregon Street from Shasta Street to Yuba Street. Fill sidewalk gaps, tie in paving and install pedestrian lighting,
Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Oregon Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvements
$0
$1,407,310
$1,407,310
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2022-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $202,190 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,310 Total $202,190 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,310
Project Development $202,190 $202,190
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,205,120
$202,190 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,310
California St Bikeway Project
Construction of a two-way Class IV bikeway along California Street between Yuba Street and Tehama Street.

Improvements of pedestrian access by rebuilding curb ramps, creating bulb-outs, and increasing crossing visability.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
California St between Yuba and Tehama
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$4,140,000
$4,140,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2022-02
AHSC Grant $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,000
Federal EDA Grant $0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
Total $730,000 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,140,000
Project Development $730,000 $730,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
$730,000 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,140,000
Systemic Left Turns
Provide left turn lanes and left turn protected phasing where none exists at selected intersections. Includes striping between intersections to facilitate intersection modifications.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$1,201,000
$1,201,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2023-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $21,000 $99,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,100 State Grant $189,000 $891,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,080,900
Total $210,000 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,201,000
Project Development $210,000 $210,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $991,000
$210,000 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,201,000
C-32
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting
Install new intersection safety lighting where none exists and correct deficient existing lighting at un-signalized intersections.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$849,100
$849,100
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2023-02
Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,445 $7,046 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,491 State Grant $143,055 $697,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $840,609
Total $144,500 $704,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $849,100
Project Development $144,500 $144,500
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $704,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $704,600
$144,500 $704,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $849,100
Small Projects
Various traffic operation and capacity improvements. Funds will be used as match for grant-funded projects or leverage for development projects.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3520-01
Traffic Impact Fees $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Project Development $50,000 $300,000
Construction
Total
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Traffic Calming
Description: Install devices to reduce speeds and cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3520-01-4
Local Streets and Roads Fund $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Total $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Project Development $5,000 $30,000
Construction
Total
$5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
$45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $270,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 C-33
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Bridge Maintenance Program
Description: Bridge Maintenance Grant funding various repairs of 7 Bridges.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Bridges Improvements
$0
$849,999
$849,999
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-3572-03
Federal HBP Grant $134,565 $511,703 $0 $0 $0 $0 $646,268 Local Streets and Roads Fund $17,435 $66,296 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $203,731 Total $152,000 $577,999 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $849,999 Project Development $152,000 $152,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $577,999 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $697,999
$152,000 $577,999 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $849,999 Pavement Maintenance
Description: Roadway surface maintenance work conducted annually on various streets.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvements
ST-3580-01
ARPA $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $16,000,000 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 Total $3,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $29,000,000 Project Development $300,000 $2,900,000
Construction
Total
$600,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
$2,700,000 $5,400,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $26,100,000 $3,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $29,000,000 Canby Road Widening
Description: Widen Canby Road north of Browning along the west side. Includes curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Canby Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$61,558
$300,000
$361,558
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-08
Dana Drive Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
C-34
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout
Description: Construct roundabout at convergence of Churn Creek Road with both Victor Avenue and Rancho Road.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Churn Creek/Ranch/Victor Intersection
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$4,650,000
$4,650,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-09
Traffic Impact Fees $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000 Total $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000 Project Development $100,000 $500,000
Construction
Total
$200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,150,000
$100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000
Traffic Signal Modification
Description: Modification of traffic signal at various corners to support widening.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Buenaventura Blvd at Sunset Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$43,000
$292,895
$335,895
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-10
Impact Fees $292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Total $292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Project Development $29,290 $29,290
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$263,606 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $263,606
$292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Loma Vista Signal
Project to improve South Bonnyview corridor between Bechelli and Churn Creek. Needed to accommodate growth and will be a TIF credit/reimbursement agreement.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Loma Vista to Bechelli
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$8,250,000
$8,250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-11
Traffic Impact Fees $8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000 Total $8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
Project Development $1,250,000 $1,250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000
$8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
C-35
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Sidewalk Replacement
Description: Annual project to replace worn and/or damaged sections of existing sidewalks.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-4407-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Project Development $25,000 $150,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
$225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $1,350,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 ADA Curb Ramps
Description: Install ADA-accessible curb ramps at various intersections throughout the city.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Widening/Extension
ST-4638-15
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $825,000 Project Development $20,000 $82,500
Construction
Total
$20,000 $20,000 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500
$180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $67,500 $67,500 $67,500 $742,500 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $825,000 Turtle Bay to Downtown
Turtle Bay to Downtown Multi-use trail connecting Dana to Downtown and Turtle Bay boat ramp to Continental.

Includes a tunnel; shared use path; and pedestrian safety lighting.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
North of (parallel to) SR44
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening
$220,825
$6,550,000
$6,770,825
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-05
State ATP Grant $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000 Total $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
Project Development $475,000 $950,000
Construction
Total
$475,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000
$475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
C-36
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT)
The project will complete sidewalk gaps, install ADA ramps, narrow travel lanes to provide standard bike lanes, and add street lighting along Churn Creek Road and Maraglia Street. An enhanced crosswalk will also be installed on Churn Creek Road with a refuge island and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Churn Creek Rd. between Hartnell and Cypress and
Maraglia St. between Churn Creek and Hilltop.

Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$58,260
$9,973,000
$10,031,260
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-08
Federal Grant $810,000 $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,442,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $90,000 $90,000 $351,000 $0 $0 $0 $531,000 Total $900,000 $900,000 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,973,000
Project Development $900,000 $1,800,000
Construction
Total
$900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,173,000
$900,000 $900,000 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,973,000
Bechelli Lane Improvements
Construct buffered bike lanes, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing beacons, and refuge islands.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Bechelli Ln. from S. Bonnyview to Cypress Ave. and
Loma Vista from Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd.

Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$1,095,000
$11,158,618
$12,253,618
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-10
ARPA $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Federal ATP Grant $6,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,740,000
Local Streets and Roads Fund $2,594,848 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,594,848 REU Tran $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Waste Water $423,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $423,770
Water $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $11,158,618 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,158,618
Project Development $1,115,862 $1,115,862
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,042,756 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,042,756
$11,158,618 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,158,618
C-37
Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
Competitive grant-funded projects to improve safety along street right-of-way. Contingent upon grant approval from various programs.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$138,420
$1,137,200
$1,275,620
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-12
Federal HSIP Grant $1,137,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,137,200 Total $1,137,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,137,200
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,137,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,137,200
$1,137,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,137,200
Shasta Street Railroad Crossing Improvements
Description: Install pedestrian crossing improvements on north side of railroad crossing.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Shasta Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$126,000
$399,719
$525,719
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4783-08
State CPUC Grant $399,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,719
Total $399,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,719
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$399,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,719
$399,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,719
Airport Corridor Phase II
Description: Widen Airport Road for additional capacity and operational safety.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Airport Road Corridor
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$122,030
$1,918,350
$2,040,380
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4803-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $0 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,618,350 RRA Successor $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $300,000 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,918,350
Project Development $300,000 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,618,350
$300,000 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,918,350
C-38
Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Old Alturas Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$1,069,336
$4,809,000
$5,878,336
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-04
Federal HBP Grant $90,000 $4,169,910 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,259,910 Traffic Impact Fees $10,000 $539,090 $0 $0 $0 $0 $549,090 Total $100,000 $4,709,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,809,000
Project Development $100,000 $100,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $4,709,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,709,000
$100,000 $4,709,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,809,000
Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Sacramento Drive
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$953,120
$3,913,000
$4,866,120
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-05
Federal HBP Grant $63,000 $50,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,913,000 Total $63,000 $50,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,913,000
Project Development $63,000 $113,000
Construction
Total
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,800,000
$63,000 $50,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,913,000
Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Eastside Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$486,588
$3,865,000
$4,351,588
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-06
Federal HBP Grant $57,505 $3,364,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,421,645 Traffic Impact Fees $7,495 $435,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $443,355 Total $65,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,865,000
Project Development $65,000 $65,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,800,000
$65,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,865,000
C-39
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Girvan Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Girvan Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$430,260
$2,455,000
$2,885,260
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-07
Federal HBP Grant $44,265 $2,129,147 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,173,412 Traffic Impact Fees $5,735 $275,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $281,588 Total $50,000 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,455,000
Project Development $50,000 $50,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,405,000
$50,000 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,455,000
Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Railroad Avenue over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Westside Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$536,672
$3,900,000
$4,436,672
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-08
Federal HBP Grant $3,452,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,452,670
Traffic Impact Fees $447,330 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $447,330
Total $3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
$3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000
Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal
Description: Replace the bridge on Canyon Road over the ACID Canal.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Canyon Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$400,130
$2,142,200
$2,542,330
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-09
Federal HBP Grant $160,950 $1,735,542 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,896,492 Traffic Impact Fees $20,850 $224,858 $0 $0 $0 $0 $245,708 Total $181,800 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,142,200
Project Development $181,800 $181,800
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,960,400
$181,800 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,142,200
C-40
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Eastside Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$645,000
$4,655,676
$5,300,676
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-10
Federal HBP Grant $4,121,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,121,676
Traffic Impact Fees $534,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $534,000
Total $4,655,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,676
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,655,683 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,683
$4,655,683 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,683
Old Oregon Trail Widening
Description: Widen and realign Old Oregon Trail from Paso Robles to Bear Mountain Road.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Old Oregon Trail
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$762,400
$2,763,667
$3,526,067
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4956-04
Federal HSIP Grant $57,060 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,460,300 Traffic Impact Fees $36,340 $267,027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $303,367 Total $93,400 $2,670,267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,763,667
Project Development $63,400 $63,400
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$30,000 $2,670,267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,700,267
$93,400 $2,670,267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,763,667
Oasis Road Specific Plan Update
Description: Update the Oasis Road Specific Plan.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$50,000
$50,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-NRTBD-01
North Redding Traffic Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 District Fees
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
C-41
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Stillwater Business Park - Phase II
Description: Improvements to Stillwater Business Park.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Stillwater Business Park
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$11,000,000
$11,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-SBP-01
General Fund $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Project Development $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
$1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000
C-42
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Infiltration and Inflow Control
Repair and rehabilitation of various aging sewer mains throughout the City as needed to reduce rainwater intrusion into the sewer system.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-3512-01
Wastewater Rates $3,260,823 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,260,823 Total $3,260,823 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,260,823 Project Development $326,082 $1,026,082
Construction
Total
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000
$2,934,741 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $9,234,741 $3,260,823 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,260,823 Lift Station Improvements
Description: Repair/Rehab Lift Stations
Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-3525-01
Wastewater Rates $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $1,812,000 Total $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $1,812,000 Project Development $60,400 $362,400
Construction
Total
$60,400 $60,400 $60,400 $60,400 $60,400
$241,600 $241,600 $241,600 $241,600 $241,600 $241,600 $1,449,600 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $302,000 $1,812,000 Westside Interceptor - Phase III
Expansion of the main sewer serving the west region of the City to accommodate growth. Phase III will run from Girvan Road south to the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Girvan Road to the Clear Creek WWTP
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$559,579
$10,000,000
$10,559,579
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4086-02
Wastewater Connection Fees $6,500,000 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Total $6,500,000 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
Project Development $1,300,000 $2,000,000
Construction
Total
$0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0
$5,200,000 $0 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000
$6,500,000 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
C-43
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Repair/Replace Sewer Lines
Description: Replace aging and damaged clay piping throughout the city.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-4203-02
Wastewater Rates $1,649,500 $999,500 $1,256,857 $309,067 $721,667 $4,000,000 $8,936,591 Total $1,649,500 $999,500 $1,256,857 $309,067 $721,667 $4,000,000 $8,936,591 Project Development $164,950 $893,659
Construction
Total
$99,950 $125,686 $30,907 $72,167 $400,000
$1,484,550 $899,550 $1,131,171 $278,160 $649,500 $3,600,000 $8,042,932 $1,649,500 $999,500 $1,256,857 $309,067 $721,667 $4,000,000 $8,936,591 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WW-4703-01
Wastewater Rates $633,950 $651,640 $669,830 $688,520 $707,730 $727,476 $4,079,146 Total $633,950 $651,640 $669,830 $688,520 $707,730 $727,476 $4,079,146 Project Development $126,790 $815,829
Construction
Total
$130,328 $133,966 $137,704 $141,546 $145,495
$507,160 $521,312 $535,864 $550,816 $566,184 $581,981 $3,263,317 $633,950 $651,640 $669,830 $688,520 $707,730 $727,476 $4,079,146 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WW-4801-05
Wastewater Rates $422,640 $434,440 $446,570 $459,030 $471,840 $485,004 $2,719,524 Total $422,640 $434,440 $446,570 $459,030 $471,840 $485,004 $2,719,524 Project Development $84,528 $543,905
Construction
Total
$86,888 $89,314 $91,806 $94,368 $97,001
$338,112 $347,552 $357,256 $367,224 $377,472 $388,003 $2,175,619 $422,640 $434,440 $446,570 $459,030 $471,840 $485,004 $2,719,524 C-44
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase I/II
Description: Full scale build-out for Biosolids final processing.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$2,027,427
$7,250,000
$9,277,427
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4801-10
Wastewater Rates $0 $2,000,000 $5,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,250,000 Total $0 $2,000,000 $5,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,250,000
Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,600,000 $5,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,850,000
$0 $2,000,000 $5,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,250,000
Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase III/IV
Description: Future scale build-out for Biosolids final processing.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$11,750,000
$11,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4801-11
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000 $10,000,000 $11,750,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000 $10,000,000 $11,750,000
Project Development $0 $350,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $10,000,000 $11,400,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000 $10,000,000 $11,750,000
North Market Lift Station
Description: Increase capacity and improve flow to North Market Lift Station.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
971 N Market Street
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$580,685
$580,685
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-LS-CC-04
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $134,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $30,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $446,685
Total $0 $0 $164,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $580,685
Project Development $0 $32,817
Construction
Total
$0 $32,817 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $131,989 $415,879 $0 $0 $547,868
$0 $0 $164,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $580,685
C-45
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Lake Redding Interceptor I
Construct approximately 790 feet of 27" pipe, 4,710 feet of 24" pipe, and 60 feet of 21" pipe from N Market Lift Station to Elk Drive.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Lake Redding Estates
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$120,000
$4,975,000
$5,095,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-01
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $99,500 $398,000 $0 $497,500 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $895,500 $3,582,000 $0 $4,477,500 Total $0 $0 $0 $995,000 $3,980,000 $0 $4,975,000
Project Development $0 $995,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $995,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,980,000 $0 $3,980,000
$0 $0 $0 $995,000 $3,980,000 $0 $4,975,000
Woodacre Drive
Description: Replace approximately 1,400 feet of old pipe constructed at substandard grade.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Woodacre Drive and Bechelli Lane Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$18,674
$1,250,000
$1,268,674
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-28
Wastewater Rates $1,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Total $1,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Project Development $125,000 $125,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,125,000
$1,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Buenaventura Sewer
Description: Replacement of undersized sewer pipe ranging in size from 12- to 18-inches in diameter.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Buenaventura Blvd and Westside Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$3,950,000
$3,950,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-4
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $237,000 $0 $237,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $742,600 $2,970,400 $0 $3,713,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $742,600 $3,207,400 $0 $3,950,000
Project Development $0 $742,600
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $742,600 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,207,400 $0 $3,207,400
$0 $0 $0 $742,600 $3,207,400 $0 $3,950,000
C-46
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Mercury Drive
Description: Replace approximately 1,670 feet of existing 8-inch diameter AC pipe with 12-inch diameter pipe.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Mercury Drive Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,450,000
$1,450,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-5
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000
Project Development $0 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $1,000,000 $1,150,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000
Sulphur Creek
Replace approximately 2,730 feet of undersized pipe in Lower Sulphur Creek and approximately 2,700 feet of undersized pipe in Upper Sulphur Creek.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Sulphur Creek Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$2,931,430
$2,931,430
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-8-9
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $293,143 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $2,931,430 Total $0 $0 $293,143 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $2,931,430
Project Development $0 $293,143
Construction
Total
$0 $293,143 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $2,638,287
$0 $0 $293,143 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $2,931,430
Oasis Road
Description: Replace approximately 1,200 feet of under capacity pipe.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Oasis Road Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$414,290
$414,290
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-01
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $54,686 $218,745 $0 $0 $273,431 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $28,172 $112,687 $0 $0 $140,859
Total $0 $0 $82,858 $331,432 $0 $0 $414,290
Project Development $0 $82,858
Construction
Total
$0 $82,858 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $331,432 $0 $0 $331,432
$0 $0 $82,858 $331,432 $0 $0 $414,290
C-47
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase I
Description: Rehabilitation for sanitary sewer mains and lowers laterals. Includes manhole replacement and cover installation.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Magnolia Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$126,550
$6,400,000
$6,526,550
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-06
Wastewater Rates $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000
Total $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000
Project Development $640,000 $640,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000
$6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000
Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase II
Description: Rehabilitation for sanitary sewer mains and lowers laterals. Includes manhole replacement and cover installation.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Magnolia Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$7,000,000
$7,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-07
Wastewater Rates $0 $700,000 $0 $6,300,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000 Total $0 $700,000 $0 $6,300,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Project Development $0 $1,330,000
Construction
Total
$700,000 $0 $630,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $5,670,000 $0 $0 $5,670,000
$0 $700,000 $0 $6,300,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Magnums Area Sewer
Installation of 23,725 linear feet of sewer line in the Magnums Lane remote area. Includes rehabilitation of all existing manholes.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Lake Blvd E to Beltline Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$3,700,000
$3,700,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-08
Connection Fees $0 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,700,000
Total $0 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,700,000
Project Development $0 $740,000
Construction
Total
$740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,960,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,960,000
$0 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,700,000
C-48
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Tehama Sewer
Description: Increase 3800 feet of pipe from 8-inch to 12-inch.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Tehama Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$2,600,000
$2,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-09
Wastewater Rates $520,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000 Total $520,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000
Project Development $520,000 $520,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,080,000
$520,000 $2,080,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000
Center Sewer
Description: Increase 1500 feet of sewer line from 12-inches to 15-inches.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Center Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,150,000
$1,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-10
Wastewater Rates $230,000 $920,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 Total $230,000 $920,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000
Project Development $230,000 $230,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $920,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $920,000
$230,000 $920,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000
Mary Lake Sewer
Description: Increase pipe diameter from 8-inches to 10-inches for approximately 5150 feet.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Mary Lake Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$2,150,000
$2,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-11
Wastewater Rates $0 $430,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000 Total $0 $430,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000
Project Development $0 $430,000
Construction
Total
$430,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,720,000
$0 $430,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000
C-49
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Lake Keswick
Description: Increase pipe diameter from 12-inches to 15-inches for approximately 2010 feet.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Lake Keswick Area
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$3,550,000
$3,550,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-12
Wastewater Rates $710,000 $2,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,000 Total $710,000 $2,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,000
Project Development $710,000 $710,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,840,000
$710,000 $2,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,000
Upper Buenaventura Sewer
Description: Increase 750 feet of sewer line from 12-inches to 15-inches.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Buenaventura Blvd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-13
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $235,000 $940,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,175,000 Total $0 $235,000 $1,015,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Project Development $0 $235,000
Construction
Total
$235,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,015,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,015,000
$0 $235,000 $1,015,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Lakeside Sewer
Increase pipe diameter from 8-inch to 12-inch for 1200 feet, 10-inch to 18-inch for 750 feet and 12-inch to 18-inch for 700 feet.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Eureka Way & Buenaventura Blvd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,750,000
$1,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-14
Wastewater Rates $0 $350,000 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000 Total $0 $350,000 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000
Project Development $0 $350,000
Construction
Total
$350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000
$0 $350,000 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000
C-50
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Influent Screening
Description: Screening at influent pump station.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-06
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Total $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000
$0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Clear Creek Electrical Maintenance
Description: Replace outdated electrical components.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-07
Wastewater Rates $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Clear Creek Pond Upgrades
Description: Lining of emergency retention ponds.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$3,631,930
$3,413,095
$7,045,025
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-3
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,050 $677,224 $853,274 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $528,150 $2,031,671 $2,559,821 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $704,200 $2,708,895 $3,413,095
Project Development $0 $704,200
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $704,200 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,708,895 $2,708,895
$0 $0 $0 $0 $704,200 $2,708,895 $3,413,095
C-51
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Power Upgrade to Outfall
Description: Separate utility feed to outfall structure.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$225,000
$225,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-4
Wastewater Connection Fees $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 Total $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
$225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
Hypo Project
Description: Alternate chlorination chemical process.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road & 6475 Airport Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-5
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $450,000
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Bisulfite Project
Description: Alternate de-chlorination chemical process.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2220 Metz Road & 6475 Airport Rd
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-P-13
Wastewater Rates $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Total $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
C-52
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Sludge Lagoons & Drying Beds
Description: Construction of sludge lagoons at Stillwater Treatment Plant Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-S-6
Wastewater Rates $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000
Total $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000
Project Development $0 $1,200,000
Construction
Total
$1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000
$0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000
C-53
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Pump Station Improvements
Description: Rehab/repair pump stations.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-3020-01-02
Water Rates $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $266,577 $274,009 $1,543,756 Total $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $266,577 $274,009 $1,543,756 Project Development $23,881 $154,376
Construction
Total
$24,547 $25,231 $26,658 $26,658 $27,401
$214,929 $220,923 $227,082 $239,919 $239,919 $246,608 $1,389,380 $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $266,577 $274,009 $1,543,756 Pump House 1 Replacement Environmental
Environmental review for replacing Pump House 1 on the Sacramento River. Alternatives include rehabbing at current location or constructing a new pump house at various upstream locations.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
2300 Riverside Drive
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$939,702
$1,560,315
$2,500,017
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-3020-04
Water Rates $1,560,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560,315
Total $1,560,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560,315
Project Development $1,560,315 $1,560,315
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,560,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560,315
Replace Water Mains
Description: Replace cast-iron, steel, asbestos, galvanized and degraded water mains throughout the City.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Distribution System
W-4286-01
Water Rates $10,235,620 $4,945,020 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $33,180,640 Total $10,235,620 $4,945,020 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $33,180,640 Project Development $1,535,343 $4,977,096
Construction
Total
$741,753 $450,000 $600,000 $750,000 $900,000
$8,700,277 $4,203,267 $2,550,000 $3,400,000 $4,250,000 $5,100,000 $28,203,544 $10,235,620 $4,945,020 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $33,180,640 C-54
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Masonic
Description: 24" Lake Boulevard - Oasis to Northpoint (9,090 feet) Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Lake Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$350,750
$5,500,000
$5,850,750
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4286-19
Water Connection Fees $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,375,000 Water Rates $4,125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,125,000
Total $5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,500,000
Project Development $1,100,000 $1,100,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,400,000
$5,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,500,000
18" Masonic to Hilltop
Replace 1220 feet of existing waterline with 16" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Masonic to Hilltop
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$24,040
$2,223,105
$2,247,145
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4286-28
Water Connection Fees $0 $486,079 $0 $0 $0 $0 $486,079
Water Rates $1,575,000 $162,026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,737,026
Total $1,575,000 $648,105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,223,105
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,575,000 $648,105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,223,105
$1,575,000 $648,105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,223,105
Well Rehabilitation
Description: Inspect, rehab, clean casing and screens to maintain production capacity.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4338-02-03
Water Rates $67,570 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $861,358 Total $67,570 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $861,358 Project Development $13,514 $172,270
Construction
Total
$42,332 $14,277 $43,117 $15,084 $43,946
$54,055 $169,328 $57,109 $172,467 $60,338 $175,787 $689,084 $67,569 $211,660 $71,386 $215,584 $75,422 $219,733 $861,354 C-55
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Well Head Treatment System
Enterprise well water quality improvements. Study and implementation of sequestering agents distribution system flushing and loading to reduce iron, manganese and arsenic levels during the next five years. Other major well head treatment improvements postponed pending identification of funding.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Enterprise Wells
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$132,770
$2,873,000
$3,005,770
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-04
Water Rates $2,873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,873,000
Total $2,873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,873,000
Project Development $287,300 $287,300
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,585,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,585,700
$2,873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,873,000
Install Oxidation/Filtration at EW-14
Description: Install oxidation/filtration treatment system to remove manganese.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5550 Old Oregon Trail
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$4,035,690
$4,035,690
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-05
Water Rates $0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Total $0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Project Development $0 $403,570
Construction
Total
$0 $403,570 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $3,632,120
$0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Rehab EW-11 or Construct New Well
Description: Rehabilitate EW-11 or design and construct new well at a new location.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
5055 Goodwater Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$3,550,457
$3,550,457
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-06
Water Rates $0 $0 $3,550,457 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,457
Total $0 $0 $3,550,457 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,457
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $3,550,457 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,457
$0 $0 $3,550,457 $0 $0 $0 $3,550,457
C-56
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Upgrades at the Foothill Water Treatment Plant to accommodate growth and replace aging equipment.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
3100 Foothill Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4492-01
Water Rates $3,546,640 $1,460,820 $500,000 $513,939 $528,266 $542,993 $7,092,658 Total $3,546,640 $1,460,820 $500,000 $513,939 $528,266 $542,993 $7,092,658 Project Development $354,664 $709,266
Construction
Total
$146,082 $50,000 $51,394 $52,827 $54,299
$3,191,976 $1,314,738 $450,000 $462,545 $475,439 $488,694 $6,383,392 $3,546,640 $1,460,820 $500,000 $513,939 $528,266 $542,993 $7,092,658 Cypress Avenue Booster Pump Station
Construction of a 7 MGD pump station at the existing supervisory valve. This pump station will have the ability to pump in either direction between the Foothill and Enterprise pressure zones and greatly increase the flexibility of water delivery in the distribution system.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Cypress Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$488,850
$2,750,610
$3,239,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4600-02
Water Rates $2,750,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,750,610
Total $2,750,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,750,610
Project Development $275,061 $275,061
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,475,549 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,475,549
$2,750,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,750,610
Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Various maintenance projects at the Buckeye Water Treatment Plant.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
11501 Benson Drive/3100 Foothill Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4606-01
Water Rates $854,077 $125,730 $129,235 $132,838 $136,541 $140,347 $1,518,768 Total $854,077 $125,730 $129,235 $132,838 $136,541 $140,347 $1,518,768 Project Development $85,408 $151,877
Construction
Total
$12,573 $12,924 $13,284 $13,654 $14,035
$768,669 $113,157 $116,312 $119,554 $122,887 $126,312 $1,366,891 $854,077 $125,730 $129,235 $132,838 $136,541 $140,347 $1,518,768 C-57
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Hill 900 Reservoir
Description: Determine location and construct additional reservoir.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
West Side of Redding
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$4,811,726
$4,811,726
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4795-03
Water Rates $3,205,856 $1,605,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,811,726 Total $3,205,856 $1,605,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,811,726
Project Development $320,586 $481,173
Construction
Total
$160,587 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,885,270 $1,445,283 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,330,553
$3,205,856 $1,605,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,811,726
Reservoir Improvements
Description: Rehab/repair 1 MG Cascade tank and 3.5MG Enterprise tank.

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
1987 Kenyon Drive
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,975,000
$1,975,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4795-04-05
Water Rates $475,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $1,975,000 Total $475,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $1,975,000 Project Development $47,500 $197,500
Construction
Total
$50,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
$427,500 $450,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $450,000 $1,777,500
$475,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $1,975,000
Beltline 20" - Oasis to Mountain Lakes
Replace approximately 1,013 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Beltline Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$658,258
$658,258
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-01
Water Connection Fees $0 $0 $164,564 $0 $0 $0 $164,564
Water Rates $0 $0 $493,693 $0 $0 $0 $493,693
Total $0 $0 $658,258 $0 $0 $0 $658,258
Project Development $0 $131,652
Construction
Total
$0 $131,652 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $526,606 $0 $0 $0 $526,606
$0 $0 $658,258 $0 $0 $0 $658,258
C-58
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Oasis 20" - UPRR to Beltline
Replace 1225 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Oasis Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,231,962
$1,231,962
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-02
Water Connection Fees $0 $0 $246,392 $0 $0 $0 $246,392
Water Rates $0 $0 $985,570 $0 $0 $0 $985,570
Total $0 $0 $1,231,962 $0 $0 $0 $1,231,962
Project Development $0 $246,392
Construction
Total
$0 $246,392 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $985,570 $0 $0 $0 $985,570
$0 $0 $1,231,962 $0 $0 $0 $1,231,962
Oasis 20" - Calexico to A6-V1
Replace 2,475 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total
Oasis Road
Proposed Funding: 2027-28
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$969,434
$969,434
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-03
Water Connection Fees $0 $83,371 $333,486 $0 $0 $0 $416,857 Water Rates $0 $110,515 $442,062 $0 $0 $0 $552,577
Total $0 $193,886 $775,548 $0 $0 $0 $969,434
Project Development $0 $193,887
Construction
Total
$38,777 $155,110 $0 $0 $0
$0 $155,109 $620,438 $0 $0 $0 $775,548
$0 $193,886 $775,548 $0 $0 $0 $969,434
The Engineering Division Cost Allocation section provides an approximation of costs for the project development and construction for projects requiring the involvement of the Engineering Division. Project development costs include preliminary engineering, environmental and permitting, right-of-way, design, consultant oversight, and bidding. Construction costs include the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, and consultant oversight.

Note:

C-59
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Future Projects
Streets
CIP No. Project Funding Source
ST-IN-HA Church Creek/Hartmeyer Intersection
ST-IN-AL Church Creek/Alrose Intersection
ST-2005-62 Traffic Control Device: Victor Avenue - El Vista Street ST-2005-61 Traffic Control Device: Lake Boulevard - Santa Rosa Way ST-2005-60 Canyon Creek Road Area Improvements
ST-2005-57 Traffic Control Device: Airport Road - Meadowview Drive ST-2005-51 Traffic Control Device: Hartnell Avenue - Lawrence Road ST-2005-50 Traffic Control Device: Lake Boulevard - Panorama Drive ST-F-104 Shasta View Drive Extension
ST-F-SV Shasta View Drive/College View Drive
DD651511
DD651510
DD651449
DD651472
CCRTIF/Fund 117
DD651492
DD651460
DD651422
DD650722
DD651506
Water
CIP No. Project Funding Source
W-4286-01 Twin View Waterline DD651440
W-EWT-05 EW12 to EW14 Pipeline Water Rates
W-EWT-03 EW14 Filtration Water Rates
W-EW-01 EW11 Rehab Water Rates
Note: The Future Projects list includes a variety of projects that are either beyond the 5-year window of the CIP and/or do not have all funding sources identified at this time. The identified Water, Wastewater, and Traffic impact fee program projects represent the basis of the relative Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000) compliant programs. Reimbursement for construction of these impact fee projects may be considered in accordance with Section 16.20.090 of the Redding Municipal Code.

C-60
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Future Projects with Impact Fee Component
CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Storm Drain
SD-DET-01 Local Deterring System 2028-29 Storm Drain Fees CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Streets
ST-TIF-CIX Churn Creek Road/SR 299 Interchange 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees/DD651505
ST-TIF-CC1 Churn Creek Road Widening - Browning to Bodenhamer 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-4226-02-2 Placer Street Improvements - Airpark to Pleasant 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-HIL Hilltop Drive Widening - River Bend Road to Browning Street 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-VC1,2,3 Victor Avenue Widening - Hartnell to Old Alturas 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-RA Railroad Avenue Widening - Grandview Ave. to Schley Ave. 2030-31 Traffic Impact Fees Old Alturas Road - ROW and Roundabouts at Victor Avenue, Lema Road, and Edgewood Drive
ST-TIF-OLD 2031-32 Traffic Impact Fees
CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Water
W-CONV-14 2028-29
W-CONV-16 2028-29
New 3.5 MG Buckeye Tank
Construct 24" Waterline from Quartz Hill Road to Keswick Dam Road
W-CONV-15 Construct 30" Waterline from Buckeye Tank to Quartz Hill Road 2028-29 Water Connection
Fees/Water Rates
Water Connection
Fees/Water Rates
Water Connection
Fees/Water Rates
The Future Projects list includes a variety of projects that are either beyond the 5-year window of the CIP and/or do not have all funding sources identified at this time. The identified Water, Wastewater, and Traffic impact fee program projects represent the basis of the relative Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000) compliant programs. Reimbursement for construction of these impact fee projects may be considered in accordance with Section 16.20.090 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Note:

C-61
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2022-27 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Information only.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.

Background/Analysis
Following the annual reorganization of the City Council, the City Council liaison assignments have been reviewed and modified. Attached for the City Council’s information is the updated list of Departmental, Commission, Committee, and Agency liaison assignments.

Appointments made by the Mayor’s City Selection Committee are contingent upon the decision of the Committee at its annual meeting.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is routine operational item occurring on an annual basis.

Attachments
^2023 Liaison List-by Agency
^2023 Liaison List by Member
MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 9A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9A--City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2023.

Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
Packet Pg. 651
2023 CITY OF REDDING CITY COUNCIL

AGENCY, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND DEPARTMENTAL LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES By Agency
CITY DEPARTMENTS Liaison
City Clerk Dacquisto
City Treasurer-Finance Dacquisto
Community Services Munns
Development Services Audette
Electric Utility (Includes outside energy-related agencies) Winter Fire Winter
Housing Munns
Information Technology Munns
Personnel Mezzano
Police Audette
Airport Mezzano
Public Works Winter
CITY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES Liaison Alternate
Audit Committee (Mayor/Vice Mayor) Dacquisto Audette
Mezzano
Community Development Advisory Committee Munns
Community Services Advisory Commission Munns
Planning Commission Audette
Shasta Public Library Citizens' Advisory Committee Dacquisto Native American Liaison Mezzano
OTHER AGENCIES Representative Alternate
Downtown Collaborative (2 Reps + 1 Alt) Mezzano Audette Winter
Economic Development Corporation Dacquisto Audette
Enterprise Anderson Groundwater Sustainability Agency (EAGSA) Winter Mezzano League of California Cities Mezzano Audette
NSVIRWM Governance Board (COR has an Alternate to the Board) N/A Winter Redding Area Water Council - Policy Advisory Committee Winter N/A Public Access TV (Shasta County Arts Council) Audette N/A Shasta County Community Action Board Munns N/A
Shasta County Remote Access Network Advisory (RAN) Mezzano N/A Youth Options Shasta (Formerly Youth Violence Prevention Council of Shasta County)
Munns N/A
**CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE Representative Alternate
Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) (2 Reps + 1 Alt) Audette Mezzano Munns
Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) (1 Rep + 1 Alt) Mezzano Dacquisto Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) N/A Dacquisto Superior California Economic Development District (SCEDD) Director N/A Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) For COR Mezzano Dacquisto Rev: 1/9/2023
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: ^2023 Liaison List-by Agency (9A--City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2023) 2023 CITY OF REDDING CITY COUNCIL AGENCY, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND

DEPARTMENTAL LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES

BY COUNCIL MEMBER
All Five City Council Members serve on the following: Redding Area Bus Authority; Redding Capital Services; Redding Housing Authority; Redding Joint Powers Financing Authority; Redding Municipal Library Board; and Successor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency.

Mayor Michael Dacquisto Vice Mayor Mark Mezzano
City Clerk Personnel
City Treasurer - Finance Airports
Audit Committee (Mayor/Vice Mayor) Audit Committee (Mayor/Vice Mayor) Shasta Public Library Citizens’ Advisory Committee Native American Liaison Economic Development Corporation Downtown Collaborative (2 Reps + 1 Alt) League of California Cities
ALTERNATE Shasta County Remote Access Network Advisory (RAN) Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) (1 Rep + 1 Alt) Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) (1 Rep + 1 Alt) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) For COR Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) For COR

ALTERNATE
Enterprise Anderson Groundwater Sustainability Agency
(EAGSA)
Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) (2 Rep + 1 Alt)
Mayor Pro Tempore – Tenessa Audette Council Member - Julie Winter Development Services Electric Utility (Includes energy-related agencies) Police Fire
Planning Commission Public Works
Public Access TV (Shasta County Arts Council) Downtown Collaborative (2 Reps + 1 Alt) Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) (2 Rep + 1 Alt) Enterprise Anderson Groundwater Sustainability Agency (EAGSA)
Redding Area Water Council – Policy Advisory Committee

ALTERNATE ALTERNATE
Audit Committee (Mayor/Vice Mayor) NSVIRWM Governance Board (COR has an Alternate to the Board)
Downtown Collaborative (2 Reps + 1 Alt)
Economic Development Corporation
League of California Cities
Council Member Jack Munns
Community Services
Housing
Information Technology
Community Development Advisory Committee NOTE: The SRTA RABA Representative and Alternate Community Services Advisory Commission to be selected at RABA’s next meeting (must be from COR).

Shasta County Community Action Board
Youth Options Shasta (Formerly Youth Violence Prevention Council of Shasta County)
Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) (2 Rep + 1 Alt) NOTE: **Appointments made by the Mayor’s City Selection Committee are tentative until after their
meeting in mid-January. Rev: 1/9/2023
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: ^2023 Liaison List by Member (9A--City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2023)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Audit Committee’s recommendation to accept the Statement on Auditing Standards AU-C 260 Letter and the draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2022.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

Alternative Action
The City Council could reject the Statement on Auditing Standards AU-C 260 Letter and the draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2022, and provide additional direction to the Audit Committee and/or staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a copy of the AU-C 260 Letter to the City Council and a draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2022. The Audit Committee met on January 4, 2023, to review and discuss the reports. The Audit Committee recommended that the AU-C 260 Letter and the draft of the Single Audit Reports be brought to the City Council for acceptance.

The AU-C 260 Letter is commonly known as the ‘The Auditor’s Communication with those Charged with Governance’ and provides the auditors the forum to share their perspective on accounting policies, estimates, and disclosures used in the preparation of the financial statements and whether there were any difficulties, disagreements, or other findings in performing the audit.

The auditors found no problems or issues to convey.

MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 9B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected], [email protected] [email protected] SUBJECT: 9B--Consider Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended June 30, 2022.

Audit Committee,, Tenessa
Audette, Mayor Pro Tempore,
Mark Mezzano, Vice Mayor
Packet Pg. 654
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2023
Re: 9B--Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended June 30, 2022 Page 2 The Single Audit Reports pertain to the compliance and internal control in the expenditure of federal awards and the collection and expenditure of passenger facility charges. No findings or questioned costs were noted in the reports.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item occurring on an annual basis Attachments
2022 Redding ACFR AU-C 260 Letter
Draft 2022 Single Audit, Passenger Facility Charges Program, and Independent Auditors' Reports
Packet Pg. 655
2121 North California, Suite 290
Walnut Creek, California 94596 December 16, 2022
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Redding
Redding, California
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Redding, California (the “City”) for the year ended June 30, 2022. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information in our letter to you dated May 1, 2022. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following information related to our audit.

Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
Accounting Policies
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the basic financial statements. Other than those standards described below that were implement in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, no new accounting policies were adopted nor was the application of existing policies changed:

GASB Statement No. 87
In June 2017, GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases (GASB Statement No. 87), to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments. This statement increases the usefulness of governments’ financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It also establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Implementation of this Statement had a significant effect on the City’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2022.

GASB Statement No. 92
In January 2020, GASB issued Statement No. 92, Omnibus 2020. The primary objectives of this Statement are to enhance comparability in accounting and financial reporting and to improve consistency of authoritative literature by addressing practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements. Application of this statement did not have a material effect on the City’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.

GASB Statement No. 93
In March 2020, GASB issued Statement No. 93, Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates. Some governments have entered into agreements in which variable payments made or received depend on an interbank offered rate (IBOR)— most notably, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As a result of global reference rate reform, LIBOR is expected to cease to exist in its current form at the end of 2021, prompting governments to amend or replace financial instruments for the purpose of replacing LIBOR with other reference rates, by either changing the reference rate or adding or changing fallback provisions related to the reference rate. The objective of this Statement is to address those and other accounting and financial reporting implications that result from the replacement of an IBOR.

Application of this statement did not have a material effect on the City’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.

Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: 2022 Redding ACFR AU-C 260 Letter (9B--Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended June 30, 2022) To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Redding
Redding, California