Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA
April 4, 2023
6:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MICHAEL DACQUISTO
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Lori Moretti, Redding Police and Fire Departments' Chaplain C. Roll Call
2. PRESENTATIONS
2A. Mayor's Proclamation presented to Pathways to Hope for Children declaring April 2023 as Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month in the City of Redding.
2B. Presentation of Mayor’s Proclamation recognizing University Preparatory Middle School Team No. 1 and University Preparatory High School Team No. 1 as the 2023 Far Nor Cal Regional Science Bowl winning teams; and all of the local businesses, organizations, and individuals that contributed to a successful community event.
2C. Mayor's Proclamation presented to the Shasta County Arts Council declaring April 2023 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month in the City of Redding.
If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.org or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.
PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation. 4(a). Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – Closed Session of March 21, 2023; Special Meeting at 5:55 p.m. of March 21, 2023; and Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023.
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 17; and Payroll Register No. 19.
4(c). Accept the City of Redding Treasurer’s Report for February 2023. 4(d). Accept City of Redding Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report for the month of February 2023.
4(e). Adopt Ordinance No. 2658, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.31 (Residential Districts:
“RE” Residential Estate, ‘RS” residential single family, and “RM” Residential Multiple Family) by amending Section 18.31.020 (Land Use Regulations), Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations) by amending Sections
18.40.010 (Antennas and Microwave Equipment – Telecommunications and Wireless Facilities), 18.40.160 (Swimming Pools), and 18.40.180 (Walls and Fences), Chapter 18.41 (Off-street Parking and Loading) by amending Section
18.41.040 (Off-street Parking Spaces Required), and Chapter 18.42 (Signs) by amending Section 18.42.040 (Standards for Certain Types of Signs) thereby updating the Zoning Code.
PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC
COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.
The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
4.1(a). Approve and ratify the letter signed by the Mayor in support of HR 1586, Forest Protection and Wildland Firefighter Safety Act of 2023, which provides a Clean Water Act exemption to the usage of fire retardant to fight wildfires.
4.1(b). Authorize the Mayor to send a letter to legislators affirming opposition to Senate Bill 423, which proposes to limit local government control by requiring overreaching ministerial approval of certain multi-family housing developments, allowing for the bypassing of the California Environmental Quality Act, and eliminating public input; and authorize additional letters of opposition for future legislation that may continue to place limits on, or support of legislation that encourages, the authority of local government to maintain control of realistic zoning and permitting within the community.
4.2(b). Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services and Consulting Agreement (C-9479) with No Boundaries Transitional Housing, Inc., increasing the contract by $551,310 and thereby increasing the total amount of the contract to $933,300, and extending the term to December 31, 2023;
(2) Find that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301(d) Existing Facilities; and
(3) Find that the National Environmental Policy Act operating costs are categorically excluded, not subject to §58.5, and require no further environmental study or approval from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
4.5(b). Approve the list of qualified on-call consultants to provide professional services related to City of Redding Electric Utility, consistent with City Manager Policy No. 22-03, Selection of Technical Consultants.
4.5(c). Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860) with Orcom Solutions LLC dba VertexOne Business Services, the current provider of the hosted Customer Information System billing system for all City of Redding utilities, upgrading the current VSSP (customer web portal) platform to the VertexOne Digital product in the amount of $60,614 for a one-time implementation fee and monthly subscription fee of $2,420; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any necessary documents and amendments to complete the work.
4.9(a). Accept the grant from the State of California Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program in the amount of $72,320 to fund programs that enhance officer wellness and mental health; and Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 84th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078.
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
4.11(a). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5345 (Job No. 9618-83) Shastina Ranch Park:
(1) Award to SNL Group, Inc. in the amount of $2,460,708.34 for the Base Bid, and an additional $62,000 for the Additive Alternate 3 (Landscape Maintenance-Base Bid);
(2) Approve an additional $365,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $246,000 to provide construction contingency funding; and (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000.
4.11(c). Accept update regarding award of emergency construction contract for replacement of Storm Drain System on Eastside Road, and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.
4.11(d). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Summary Vacation of Chevy Court (A-2022-02128):
(1) Adopt Resolution summarily vacating Chevy Court and a Public Service Easement within the areas shown on Parcel Map No. 15-07 Phase 3A filed in Book 38 of Parcel Maps at Page 40, Shasta County Records (A2022-02128) described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B; (2) Find the action consistent with the General Plan; and (3) Find the action categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15035 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations.
4.11(e). Authorize the City Manager to execute a subcontract between University Enterprises, Inc. and the City of Redding for Professional Engineering Services related to the Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water Company’s consolidation into the City of Redding’s Water Utility.
4.15(b). Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding’s Volunteer Program Report for 2022; and acknowledge that April 16 through 22, 2023, is Volunteer Appreciation Week in the City of Redding.
RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
5. APPOINTMENTS
Mayor Dacquisto
5.1. Consider Mayor's appointments and reappointment to the Building Code Board of Appeals.
Recommendation:
Approve Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint and appoint the following to the City of Redding Building Code Board of Appeals to serve four-year terms effective April 5, 2023, and ending December 31, 2026:
(1) Reappoint Todd McEfee to serve an additional four-year term; (2) Appoint Andrew McCurdy to fill the vacancy by Ben Abrahamsen; (3) Appoint Rodrigo Menezes to fill the vacancy by Mike Dormer; (4) Appoint Ryan Russell to fill the vacancy by Bill Nagel; and (5) Appoint Jim Wright to fill the vacancy by Robert Wagner, Jr.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A court challenge to action taken by the City Council on any project or decision may be limited to only those issues raised during the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council during, or prior to, the public hearing.
Public Works
6.1. Public Hearing to consider adopting a Resolution forming Landscape Maintenance District 01-23 (Rancho Industrial Park)
Recommendation:
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, if the majority of the voting property owners are not opposed to the formation of Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) 01-23 (Rancho Industrial Park), adopt a Resolution:
(1) Confirming results of the election of the assessment district; (2) Confirming the assessments contained in the Engineer’s Report for said District;
(3) Ordering the formation of territory into LMD 01-23 for Fiscal Year 2023-24; and
(4) Approving the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2023-24, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, commencing with Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways Code and levying and collecting of the same for Fiscal Year 2023-24.
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Community Services
9.6(a). Consider approval of the City of Redding Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
Recommendation:
Approve and authorize the following actions relative to the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (Attachment C);
(2) Approve the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project as described, and find it satisfies the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines §15074; and
(3) Direct Staff to return to City Council, once necessary permits are obtained, for further direction relative to proceeding with the project.
Public Works
9.11(g). Consider City of Redding's response to the Shasta County Grand Jury Report regarding Enterprise Park.
Recommendation:
Authorize the Mayor to sign and send a response letter to the 2022-23 Shasta County Grand Jury concerning its report titled “Enterprise Park” in the City of Redding, regarding the City of Redding’s utilization of the lower level of Enterprise Park as a disposal area for assorted types of debris.
9.11(h). Consider Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.16 (One-Way Streets and Alleys).
Recommendation:
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Offer Ordinance amending RMC Section 11.16.010 (One-Way Streets and Alleys - Designated), relating to addressing one-way traffic in the City of Redding’s downtown core, for first reading by title only and waive the full reading; and authorize the City Attorney to prepare, and the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance; and
(2) Find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
Personnel
9.15(a). Consider Resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding and Salary Schedules with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Power Production.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and salary schedules with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Power Production Unit (IBEW PP), for a three-year term ending April 4, 2026; and approving the IBEW PP Schedule of Wage Rates effective April 5, 2023.
11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only
12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS
FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
13. ADJOURNMENT
Redding City Council April 4, 2023
Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.
City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: http://scac.cablecast.tv:8080/CablecastPublicSite/watch/4?channel=1. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.org/. Open the City’s meetings and agendas portal; Click on tab named "Meetings Videos" and select Redding City Council under “Available Archives 2023” select the desired date, then click on “video” to view the meeting.
In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.
The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.
Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Mayor's Proclamation presented to Pathways to Hope for Children declaring April 2023 as Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month in the City of Redding.
Attachments
^Proclamation
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2A--Mayor's Proclamation declaring April 2023 as Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month in the City of Redding
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City
Clerk
Packet Pg. 9
A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR
OF THE CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA,
PROCLAIMING APRIL 2023 AS
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH
WHEREAS, as a community, we have a responsibility to nurture and protect our children and help ensure they become healthy and productive adults; and WHEREAS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ranks child abuse among America’s top public health crisis. In Shasta County substantiated cases of child abuse are on the rise; and
WHEREAS, Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) such as physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, neglect, and parental illness or stress have a significant impact on a child’s future; and WHEREAS, scientific studies confirm a direct link between child abuse and a significantly greater risk later in life for substance abuse, criminal behavior, suicide, eating disorders, smoking, and premature death from chronic disease, cancer and other serious illnesses; and WHEREAS, everyone in the community should become more aware of the prevention of child abuse and neglect and engage in providing pathways to hope and healing for parents and caregivers so they can raise their children in a safe, nurturing environment; and WHEREAS, Pathways to Hope for Children (Shasta County’s Child Abuse Prevention Coordinating Council) strengthens families in our community by focusing on hope and building protective factors to ensure children are valued and supported by providing parents and caregivers opportunities to receive social connections, knowledge, and concrete support in times of needs, ensure all children will grow to their full potential; and WHEREAS, in City of Redding there are numerous committed agencies, schools, parents, relatives, volunteers, public policymakers, and professionals to increase hope in our community and eliminate child abuse and neglect to provide pathways to hope and healing for children and families; NOW, THEREFORE, as Mayor of the City of Redding, I do hereby proclaim April 2023, as Child Abuse Prevention Month in the City of Redding and urge all citizens to join the important efforts to serve children and families to work together to prevent child abuse and neglect and build healthy, safe, and nurturing families and communities.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND CAUSE THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF REDDING TO BE AFFIXED THIS 4
th DAY OF APRIL 2023.
___________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, MAYOR
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Proclamation (2A--Mayor's Proclamation declaring April 2023 as Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Presentation of Mayor’s Proclamation recognizing University Preparatory Middle School Team No. 1 and University Preparatory High School Team No. 1 as the 2023 Far Nor Cal Regional Science Bowl winning teams; and all of the local businesses, organizations, and individuals that contributed to a successful community event.
Fiscal Impact
The event was included in the budget; there is no added fiscal impact.
Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to acknowledge the winning teams of the 2023 Far Nor Cal Regional Science Bowl.
Background/Analysis
Each year the City of Redding coordinates and sponsors a regional competition for high school and middle school students as part of the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Science Bowl competition. On March 4, 2023, the Far Nor Cal Regional Science Bowl was held at Shasta College. Fourteen sponsors, as well as volunteers from the City of Redding and the community, contributed time, cash, products, and expertise to the development and implementation of the day’s events.
Nineteen teams representing 12 high schools and 13 teams representing 10 middle schools across six Northern California counties participated in the regional event. University Preparatory Middle School No. 1 and University Preparatory High School Team No. 1 won the championship and a trip sponsored by the DOE to Washington, D.C. to participate in the National Science Bowl, which will be held April 27 through May 1, 2023.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 2B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 2B--Mayor’s Proclamation Recognizing University Preparatory Middle School Team No.1 and University Preparatory High School Team No. 1 as the 2023 Far Nor Cal Regional Science Bowl Winning Teams.
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 11
Report to Redding City Council March 24, 2023
Re: 2B---Recognize University Prep Middle and High School Teams as 2023 Science Bowl Winners Page 2
The winning team members from University Preparatory Middle School Team No. 1 are Captain Joshua Kim, Charles Li, Matthew McCormick, Nathan McCormick, Benjamin Twombley, and Coach Morgan Peck. The winning team members from University Preparatory High School are Captain Sean Kim, Justin Chan, Hargun Chhabra, Sartaj Gill, Ian Sackin, and Coaches Matt Love and Cory Poole.
Recognition is due to the winning teams, local companies, organizations, and regional utilities that contributed to the event, as well as appreciation for the many volunteers who donated their time and services to the local competition.
Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further review is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Packet Pg. 12
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Mayor's Proclamation presented to the Shasta County Arts Council declaring April 2023 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month in the City of Redding.
Attachments
^Proclamation
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 2C
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2C--Mayor's Proclamation declaring April 2023 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month in the City of Redding.
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City
Clerk
Packet Pg. 13
A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR
OF THE CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA
PROCLAIMING APRIL 2023 AS
ARTS, CULTURE, AND CREATIVITY MONTH
WHEREAS, the City of Redding celebrates the role that the arts and creativity play in helping the community amplify the need for racial equity, and highlight the power of the arts to change our lives for the better; and
WHEREAS, the Shasta County Arts Council works in partnership to support the arts and creativity in Redding as an essential part of our thriving community through services including Arts advocacy, incubation and support; and WHEREAS, the Shasta County Arts Council works with Cultural District partners: Shasta Historical Society, Turtle Bay Museum, Viva Downtown, The McConnell Foundation and the City of Redding to advance the arts and creativity in our city and county; and
WHEREAS, Arts, Culture and Creativity Month of April is the 5th Annual Statewide Awareness and Advocacy Event that recognizes the crucial role of arts, culture, and creativity in the lives of everyone in California; and WHEREAS, the City of Redding recognizes that the arts and creativity support artists success and provide key job skills, and bring joy to our community while strengthening our connections; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding values partnering with the Shasta County Arts Council and the Cultural District partners and state-level organizations to promote unified support for the arts;
NOW THEREFORE, as Mayor of the City of Redding, I do hereby proclaim April 2023 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month in the City of Redding and encourage all to support the arts, culture, and creativity in the community. ____________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^Proclamation (2C--Mayor's Proclamation - Arts, Culture, Creativity Month April 2023)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – Closed Session of March 21, 2023; Special Meeting at 5:55 p.m. of March 21, 2023; and Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023.
Attachments
Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of March 21, 2023 Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting at 5_55 PM of March 21, 2023 Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City
Clerk
Packet Pg. 15
169
3/21/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
March 21, 2023, 5:15 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Dacquisto, with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.
Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart, and Interim City Clerk Sharlene Tipton. Ms. Tipton called the roll prior to leaving the Closed Session meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.
CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:15 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Interim Personnel Director Martinez Employee Organizations:
(1) Local 1934 of International Association of Fire Fighters; (2) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 1245 AFL-CIO – Power Production Unit;
(3) Redding Independent Employees’ Organization - Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit;
(4) Redding Independent Employees’ Organization - Supervisory & Confidential Unit;
(5) Redding Peace Officers’ Association; and
(6) Unrepresented Employees
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 5:50 p.m.
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City Clerk
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 154
03/21/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
March 21, 2023, 5:55 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.
Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, City Clerk Pamela Mize, and Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:
2(a). Authorize the following actions relative to the Eastside Road Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Project (Project) (Job Order No. 2992-21): (1) adopt Resolution No. 2023-027, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, by not less than fourfifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote, ratifying the City Manager’s award of an emergency construction contract for emergency replacement of a storm drain system and roadway slope on Eastside Road; (2) authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $200,000; (3) authorize the City Manager to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and (4) find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, and seconded by Council Member Winter, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, and/or authorized as recommended.
The Vote:
AYES: Council Members – Audette, Munns, Mezzano, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
Resolution No. 2023-027 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 6:01 p.m. Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting at 5_55 PM of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 171
03/21/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
March 21, 2023, 6:00 PM
The meeting was called to order at 6:01 p.m.by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.
Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, City Clerk Pamela Mize, and Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Dacquisto.
At the request of Council Member Audette, the Invocation was provided by Jennifer Zimmer.
PRESENTATIONS
2A. Mayor’s Proclamation presented to Jackie Scott, Grant Coordinator for First 5 Shasta, declaring April 1-8, 2023, as the Week of the Young Child in the City of Redding.
The City Council took no action on this informational item. 2B. Presentation by Danny Orloff, Tourism Marketing Director for Visit Redding, including a PowerPoint presentation, incorporated herein by reference, regarding past, present, and future tourism efforts for the City of Redding.
2C. Presentation by Sabrina Jurisich, Film Commissioner for Film Shasta, including a PowerPoint presentation, incorporated herein by reference, regarding past, present, and future activities.
The City Council took no action on this informational item.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Alex Bielecki opined his opposition to hate crimes in the United States including issues with the media and how they portray hate crimes.
Dnielle Gehrug, Program Manager of the Shasta County Day Reporting Center (Center), provided an invitation to the City Council and the community for the Center’s open house, incorporated herein by reference, to celebrate 10 years of supporting individuals in the community with reintegration back into society after incarceration.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:
4(b). Accept the following City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers:
(1) Accounts Payable Register No. 16 for the period of February 18, 2023, through February 28, 2023, for a total of $14,059,855.47 for check numbers 178049 through 178240, inclusive, ACH Transfer numbers 19420 through 19460, inclusive, Wire Transfer numbers 12084 through 12092, inclusive; (2) Payroll Register No. 17 for the period of February 5, 2023, through February 18, 2023, in the amount of $3,911,399.23 for electronic deposit transaction numbers 578790 through 579761, and check numbers 608947 through 608985, inclusive; and (4) Payroll Register No. 18 for the period of February 19, 2023, through March 4, 2023, in the amount of $3,991,558.66 for electronic deposit transaction numbers 579762 through 580744, and check numbers 608986 through 609005, inclusive; SUMMARY TOTAL: 21,962,813.36.
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 172
03/21/2023
4.2(a). Authorize and approve the following actions: (1) approve the Consent to Assignment of Lease (C-2965) between Joe Wong (Lessee/Assignor) and T AND S DVBE, Inc., a California Corporation (Assignee); (2) authorize the Mayor, to execute the Consent to Assignment of Lease with the respective parties; and (3) find that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Class 1 (Existing Facilities) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.
4.3(a). Approve the issuance of Request for Proposals to update the City of Redding’s Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone software and hardware.
4.4(a). Approve the part-time Development Services Technician position status change from a temporary (status 9) to a permanent (status 8) position for the City of Redding Development Services Department.
4.4(b). Accept the 2022 City of Redding General Plan/Housing Element Annual Progress Report; and direct staff to forward the document to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, as well as the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development.
4.5(a). Approve Version 6 of the Redding Electric Utility’s Renewables Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan and Enforcement Program procedure RPS-001, updating language to Section 3.2(C), Cost Limitations for Expenditures, to provide added assurance of rate predictability and stability for Redding Electric Utility customers.
4.5(b). Adopt Resolution No. 2023-025, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (C-2489) with Modesto Irrigation District to extend the term through August 1, 2040.
4.5(c). Authorize the following modifications relative to previously awarded Bid Schedule No. 5092, Three-Phase, Pad-Type Distribution Transformers to OneSource Distributors (OneSource): (1) accept a proposed change in contract pricing based on OneSource’s price request; and (2) approve the amendment of Purchase Order 113769, previously issued to OneSource, totaling $64,855.41, to the increased amount of $90,051.39.
4.6(a). Authorize submission of the following grant applications to the California Department of Transportation’s Clean California Local Grant Program for projects that support litter abatement, beautification, safety, and related public education efforts: (1) a grant application for up to $5,000,000 to be used for the area around Calaboose Creek in Downtown Redding; and (2) a grant application for up to $1,500,000 in partnership with Shasta Living Streets to construct an overlook plaza above the Sacramento River on the Diestelhorst to Downtown Trail at Riverside Drive and Court Street.
Mayor Dacquisto recused himself from voting on this item due to property ownership in the area.
On behalf of Shasta Living Streets, Anne Thomas encouraged the Council’s approval to help make the trail a safer place for all to enjoy.
The Vote:
AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Winter.
NOES: Council Members – None
RECUSE: Council Members – Dacquisto
ABSENT: Council Members – None
4.11(a).Accept update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.
4.11(b).Authorize the following related to the purchase of one 2024 Autocar ACX64 Hook Lift truck for the City of Redding Solid Waste Utility: (1) authorize the purchase using Sourcewell contract pricing, with a net delivered cost of $359,600.50 including all applicable taxes and fees; and (2) authorize the City Manager to approve future pricing adjustments, terms, and policy changes as needed due to inflation and unstable economic conditions up to a total of $30,000.
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 173
03/21/2023
4.11(c).Authorize the following actions relative to the City of Redding Master Service Agreement (C-3386) with the Tribal Council of the Redding Rancheria to provide Water and Wastewater Utility Services: (1) authorize the Mayor to execute a Third Amendment (Amendment) to the Agreement (C-3386) for a term ending October 2, 2028; and (2) find that the activity is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301(a and d) – Existing Facilities.
4.11(d).Approve and ratify the Director of Public Works signing as sub-applicant, with the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency being the primary applicant, for the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Caltrans Sustainable Communities Competitive Grant Application.
4.14(a).Adopt Resolution No. 2023-026, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, authorizing the City of Redding to participate in the settlement of the nation-wide opioid litigation against defendants Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart; delegating authority to the City Attorney to execute all documents necessary to accomplish settlement on behalf of the City of Redding; and authorizes the City Attorney to notify the national settlement administrator of the City of Redding’s intent to receive a direct distribution of settlement funds.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, ratified, and/or authorized as recommended with the exception of those items voted on separately above. The Vote:
AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
Resolution Nos. 2023-025 and 2023-026 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
APPOINTMENTS
5.1. Mayor's appointments and reappointment to the City of Redding Planning Commission.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Mayor Dacquisto, seconded by Council Member Mezzano to approve the Mayor’s recommendation to: (1) appoint Marcus Partin to the Planning Commission to fill an unscheduled vacancy by Planning Commissioner Bert Meyer, with the term ending April 30, 2024; (2) appoint Greg Balkovek to serve a four-year term effective May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2027, to fill the vacancy made by Planning Commissioner Leon Benner; and (3) reappoint Luke Miner to serve an additional four-year term effective May 1, 2023, to April 30, 2027. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1. Public Hearing - Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, initiated by the City of Redding; and Ordinance - amending Redding Municipal Code Title 18 (Zoning).
Planning Manager Lily Toy highlighted the Report to the City Council (staff report) and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.
The hour of 6:56 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dacquisto opened the public hearing to consider the proposed Ordinance amending RMC Title 18 (Zoning).
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one present wished to address the Council on this matter and closed the public hearing.
The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public Hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 174
03/21/2023
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to: (1) offer Ordinance No. 2658, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending the following, all relating to clean-up and updating of the Zoning Code, for first reading by title only and waive the full reading: (a) Chapter 18.31 (Residential Districts: “RE” Residential Estate, “RS” Residential Single Family, and “RM” Residential Multiple Family) by amending Section 18.31.020 (Land Use Regulations) relating to density for 2-family dwellings; (b) Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations) by amending Sections 18.40.010 (Antennas and Microwave Equipment; Telecommunications and Wireless Facilities) relating to permit requirements for collocation facilities; (c) Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations) by amending Section 18.40.160 (Swimming Pools) relating to filtering systems and heating equipment for swimming pools; (d) Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations) by amending Section
18.40.180 (Walls and Fences) relating to monitored electrified security fence systems; (e) Chapter 18.41 (Off-Street Parking and Loading) by amending Sections 18.41.040-A (Parking Spaces Required) relating to parking requirements for Health Clubs and Fitness Studios; and (f) Chapter 18.42 (Signs) by amending Section 18.42.040 (Standards for Certain Types of Signs) relating to flag poles within the Residential Districts; (2) authorize the City Attorney to prepare, and the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and (3) find that adoption of the ordinance is, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378, exempt from environmental review, because the passage of the proposed ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.
The Vote:
AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
City Attorney DeWalt read Ordinance No. 2658 by title only.
6.2. Public Hearing - Appeal Application (APPL-2022-02519), initiated by several appellants, regarding the Bethel Church Collyer Drive Campus located at 2080 Collyer Drive.
Council Member Winter announced that she would recuse herself from this item and asked City Attorney DeWalt to provide the legal reasons. Mr. DeWalt explained that being a member or attendee of a church in its self does not require a Council Member to recuse from all votes regarding the church. Recusal is required when the Council Member has a personal financial interest in the decision or due to a Common Law Bias. In this particular instance, Ms. Winter’s recusal is based on the Common Law Bias because she served as part of the team that reviewed this project.
City Attorney DeWalt noted that City Manager Tippin was recusing due to owning property in the area.
Council Member Winter and City Manager Tippin left the Council Chambers at 6:59 p.m.
Planning Manager Lily Toy highlighted the Report to the City Council (staff report) and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.
The hour of 7:17 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Dacquisto opened the public hearing to consider proposed Appeal Application (APPL-2022-02519) regarding the Planning Commission’s approval of Amendment Application (AMND-2020-01709) (Amendment) to Planned Development (PD-2015-00304) for the Bethel Church Campus.
The following spoke in opposition to the amendment: Kathryn McDonald, Jerry Garcee, Susan Murray, Alice Forbes, Thomas Hildebrand, and Hal Shaver.
The following spoke in support of the amendment: Greg Moore, Project Manager for Bethel Church, and Russ Wenham, Project Engineer with Omni-Means.
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one else present wished to speak and closed the Public Hearing.
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 175
03/21/2023
The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public Hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
A discussion amongst the Council ensued.
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Munns, seconded by Council member Audette, to: (1) deny Appeal Application (APPL-2022-02519), initiated by Anita Brady, Jerry Garcee, Brigitte Robertson, Alex Stephens, and Kathryn McDonald, appealing the Planning Commission's decision to approve Amendment Application (AMND-2020- 01709) to Planned Development (PD-2015-00304), for the Bethel Church Collyer Drive Campus Project located at 2080 Collyer Drive for a 2,600-seat, 171,708-square-foot church and school facility (Building 'A' and Building 'B'). The modification involves the addition of an 8,200-square-foot administrative building (Building ‘C’), a 3,600-square-foot facilities/maintenance building, and changes to the square footages of the church and school facility (Buildings ‘A’ and ‘B’). The modification proposes a total increase of 36,383 square feet in building area, resulting in an overall building area of 208,192 square feet. The property is located in a "RM-9-PD" Multiple-Family District with a Planned Development Overlay; and (2) adopt the Addendum to the 2017 Environmental Impact Report for the Bethel Church of Redding Collyer Drive Campus.
The Vote:
AYES: Council Members – Audette, and Munns
NOES: Council Members – Mezzano and Dacquisto
RECUSE: Council Members – Winter
ABSENT: Council Members – None
CITY ATTORNEY NOTE The vote resulted in two in favor and two in opposition and a majority vote was not achieved. However, to grant the appeal and thereby overturn the decision of the Planning Commission dated December 13, 2022, a motion would need to have been made and approved by at least three council members. This did not occur. As a consequence, the Planning Commission decision of December 13, 2022, to approve Amendment (AMEND-2020-01709) to Planned Development (PD-2015-00304), for Bethel Church Collyer Drive Campus Project located at 2080 Collyer Drive for a 2600 seat 171,708-square-foot church and school facility (Building ‘A’ and Building ‘B’) remained in place.
COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
Council Member Audette and Vice Mayor Mezzano attended the California Association of Councils of Government Leadership Forum held March 5 through 7, 2023, in Riverside, California, on behalf of the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency.
SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS FOR
FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
At Council Member Munns suggestion, a consensus of the Council directed the Community Services Director to return to a future Council meeting with a presentation regarding the feasibility of developing a basketball facility similar to the Hardwood Palace located in Rocklin, California.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 8:11 p.m. Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 17; and Payroll Register No. 19.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide alternate direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:
Accounts Payable:
(1) Register Number 17 for the period March 1, 2023 – March 17, 2023, in the amount of $13,285,694.54.
Payroll:
(1) Register Number 19 for the period March 5, 2023 – March 18, 2023, in the amount of $4,057,753.68.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.
Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 23
Report to Redding City Council March 24, 2023
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2 Attachments
Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 Packet Pg. 24
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 17 and Payroll Register No. 19 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the City of Redding Treasurer’s Report for February 2023.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not accept the report and provide alternate direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for the month ended February 28, 2023, the February 2023 Portfolio Management Report, and a summary of the City of Redding’s (City) portfolio. For comparative purposes, prior month information is also reported.
The City’s portfolio meets the requirements of Investment Policy No. 408. Market values for securities are obtained from US Bank Institutional Trust and Custody Department. The Treasurer’s accountability total may be measured against the Finance Department ACR 133 cash reconciliation report for February 2023.
The effective monthly rate of return for City Treasurer-managed funds during February 2023 was 2.03 percent, a gain of 6 basis points from January 2023. The Fiscal Year 2022-23 rate of return was 1.68 percent, a gain of 5 basis points from January 2023. A basis point equals one one-hundredth of one percent, or 0.01 percent.
Investment activity in the portfolio during February 2023 included the call of one Federal Agency Coupon bond and adjustments made in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) to accommodate cash flow.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(c)--City of Redding Treasurer's Report for February 2023.
Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 53
Report to Redding City Council March 24, 2023
Re: 4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023 Page 2
The Treasurer’s Accountability changed from $289,823,375 to $289,421,326, a decrease of $402,049. During February, the City processed increased demand in wholesale energy trading.
The City Treasurer respectfully recommends the Council accept the attached Treasurer’s Report for February 2023 noting a Total Treasurer’s Accountability of $289,421,326 and an organizational total of $304,518,341 which includes assets held by the City as Successor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency, as well as Entity and Trustee accounts.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Treasurer's Report February 2023
Packet Pg. 54
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) February, 2023
*Inclusive of Demand Deposit Accounts
$0
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
34.98%
10.15% 13.07%
24.95%
15.82%
1.03%
Maturities by Fiscal Year
at February 28, 2023
4.750
4.500
4.250
4.000
3.750
3.500
3.250
3.000
2.750
2.500
2.250
2.000
1.750
1.500
1.250
1.000
0.750
0.500
0.250
0.000
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
YIELD %
Monthly Yield Comparisons Year Ended February 28, 2023
Monthly Rate of Return Fiscal Yr Rate of Return 2-Yr Treasury 5-Yr Treasury LAIF C.D.s
1.03%
Federal
Agency
Coupons
44.27%
LAIF
23.89%
Treasury
Coupon
Securities
10.24%
Medium Term
Notes
8.83%
Money Market
1.43%
Municipal
Bonds
0.65%
DDA Account
9.66%
Investments by Type at February 28, 2023
Investment activity during the month of February 2023 included the call of one Federal Agency Coupon bond and cash flow
adjustments within the LAIF account.
Portfolio Diversification shifted as a result of the investment call.
As noted in the pie chart, Federal Agency Coupons decreased by approximately 1.37 points and Demand Deposit Accounts
decreased by approximately 2.06 points. The decreases were offset by an 3.43 point increase in LAIF.
Portfolio liquidity shifted the majority of maturity to the current year.
As depicted in the bar graph, the current year 2022/23 increased
1.37 points while 2027/2028 lost 1.37 points.
Portfolio Yield, as reflected in the line graph, shows a consistent increase in both the City’s monthly and year to date yields along with LAIF. The 2YR and 5YR Treasury Markets experienced a .32 and .30 basis point increase, respectively.
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023) Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Treasurer's Report February 2023 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - February 2023)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report for the month of February 2023.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report and provide alternate direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
The City Council has requested a monthly report on pooled cash. The ACR133 report summarizes, by fund, the month-to-date pooled cash balances and transactions. The Proof of Cash reconciles the ACR133 report to the Treasurer’s monthly report.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^ACR133, Current Cash Balance February 2023
^Proof of Cash February 2023
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation for the Month of February 2023.
Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 77
ACR133 CITY OF REDDING KINGSSYS 14:37:01 3/06/2023
GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATED 3/06/2023
CURRENT CASH BALANCE - CITY COUNCIL REPORT PAGE 1
ENDINGBALANCE2/28/2023
111 GENERAL FUND 28,397,324.18120 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 21,495.83121 ENT ANDERSON GROUNDWATER 72,229.81-122 PARKING FUND 420,920.04123 GENERAL SPECIAL REVENUE 272,517.00124 IPSS SPECIAL REVENUE 1,025,628.74125 ROLLING STOCK REPLACEMNT 10,862,364.61126 SPECL GAS TAX ST IMPROVE 9,725,349.31127 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 4,668,390.08128 DEVELOPMENT FUND 3,169,008.85129 LIBRARY 844,541.48130 BRANCH LIBRARIES 852,569.68134 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FUND 4,764,105.63-140 TOURISM/CONVENTION FUND 705,547.95-142 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND 57,592,342.22143 WATER UTILITY FUND 59,857,774.02145 WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND 47,046,484.28147 STORM DRAIN UTILITY FUND 7,832,778.34148 WEST CENTRAL LANDFILL 11,903,733.88149 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 15,502,707.00150 MEDIA, COMMS & PR 84,039.69151 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,172,660.95153 FLEET MAINTENANCE 13,890.87-154 BUILDING MAINT & CONSTR 1,062,804.62158 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 83,126.13160 EMPLOYER SERVICES 40,325.32-162 RMU ADMINISTRATION 1,475,563.20165 GEOGRAPHIC INFO SERVICES 630,594.87166 COMMUNICATIONS 222,835.86168 REPROGRAPHICS 77,946.76169 VOLUNTEER SERVICES 16,550.53-171 SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND 10,843,481.98172 RISK MANAGEMENT 7,929,460.98173 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS P/R 104,657.90174 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT GRP INS 361,857.22175 GASB 45 TRUST FUND 39,618.68178 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 4,264,417.68191 CD BLOCK GRANT FUND 4,450,129.03193 HOUSING AUTHORITY 101,420.22-194 REDDING REDEVELOPMENT 82,201.88200 REDDING AREA BUS AUTHOR. 66,501.07-230 LOW/MOD INC HOUS ASSET 673,817.83300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIST. 320,567.74400 LANDSCAPE DISTRICTS 783,557.59 FINAL TOTAL 289,878,698.73
ACR133 14:37:01 3/06/2023
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: ^ACR133, Current Cash Balance February 2023 (4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Sheet "D" February 2023
CITY OF REDDING
PROOF OF CASH
RECONCILIATION BETWEEN TREASURER'S REPORT AND ACR 133
As of February 2023
ACR133 TREASURER
END OF MONTH BALANCE 289,878,698.73 289,421,325.82
LESS OUTSIDE MANAGED FUNDS (717.50)
ACR133 Report
CASH ACCOUNTS NOT ON ACR133
LIBRARY MERCHANT DEPOSIT 300.00
BAD CHECKS -
PAYROLL TIMING DIFFERENCE 5,134.14
BANK CHARGES (75,895.45)
WIRE TRANSFER TIMING DIFFERENCE
OTHER ADJUSTMENTS (1,158,846.60)
BANK DR/CR (771,817.50)
TOTALS 288,649,090.82 288,649,090.82
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: ^Proof of Cash February 2023 (4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation - February 2023)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Ordinance No. 2658, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.31 (Residential Districts: “RE” Residential Estate, ‘RS” residential single family, and “RM” Residential Multiple Family) by amending Section 18.31.020 (Land Use Regulations), Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations) by amending Sections
18.40.010 (Antennas and Microwave Equipment – Telecommunications and Wireless Facilities),
18.40.160 (Swimming Pools), and 18.40.180 (Walls and Fences), Chapter 18.41 (Off-street Parking and Loading) by amending Section 18.41.040 (Off-street Parking Spaces Required), and Chapter 18.42 (Signs) by amending Section 18.42.040 (Standards for Certain Types of Signs) thereby updating the Zoning Code.
Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2658
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 18 (Zoning).
Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 80
DRAFT NEW ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.31 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: “RE”
RESIDENTIAL ESTATE, ‘RS” RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, AND “RM” RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY) BY AMENDING SECTION
18.31.020 (LAND USE REGULATIONS), CHAPTER 18.40
(DEVELOPMENT AND SITE REGULATIONS) BY AMENDING
SECTIONS 18.40.010 (ANTENNAS AND MICROWAVE EQUIPMENT –
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND WIRELESS FACILITES), 18.40.160
(SWIMMING POOLS), AND 18.40.180 (WALLS AND FENCES),
CHAPTER 18.41 (OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING) BY
AMENDING SECTION 18.41.040 (OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES
REQUIRED), AND CHAPTER 18.42 (SIGNS) BY AMENDING SECTION
18.42.040 (STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF SIGNS) THEREBY
UPDATING THE ZONING CODE
WHEREAS, the City of Redding Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to proposed amendments to Redding Municipal Code Title 18, Zoning, on February 28, 2023, and recommended that the City Council adopt said amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding held a duly noticed public hearing on March 21, 2023, prior to the first reading of this Ordinance, whereby it considered the oral and written report of City staff, and public comment;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.31 (Residential Districts: “RE” Residential Estate, “RS” Residential Single Family, and “RM” Residential Multiple Family), Section
18.31.020 (Land Use Regulations) is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.31.020 Land Use Regulations
Schedule 18.31.020-A below prescribes the land use regulations for the "RE," "RS," and "RM" Residential Districts. The regulations for each district are established by letter designations as follows:
"P" designates permitted use classifications.
"L" designates use classifications that are permitted, subject to certain limitations prescribed by the additional use regulations contained in this chapter. "Sd" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a site development permit by the Director.
"S" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a site development permit by the Board of Administrative Review.
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) "U" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a use permit by the Planning Commission.
Use classifications are defined in Chapter 18.60, Use Classifications. In cases where a specific land use or activity is not defined, the Director shall assign the land use or activity to a classification that is substantially similar in character. Use classifications not listed in the schedule or not substantially similar to the uses below are prohibited. The schedule also notes additional use regulations that apply to various uses.
Schedule 18.31.020-A: Use Regulations—Other "Residential" Districts Use Classifications "RE" "RS" "RM" Additional Regulations Residential Uses
Single Family P P P (4)
Two-Family Dwelling — L1 P (3) (6)
Residential Condominium and
Condominium Conversions — — P (9)
Manufactured Home Park — — U RM-6 through RM-10 districts only Multiple Family (Apartments) — — P
Site development permit required for 5 or more
dwelling units on a parcel. See Schedule 18.31.030-B
for maximum allowable densities. (3) (6)
Dwelling Group — — S
Group Residential — — S
Family Day Care, 6 or fewer P P P
Family Day Care, 7–14 P P P
Accessory Dwelling Units P P P See Section 18.43.140
Residential Care, Limited P P P
Supportive Housing Facilities P P P (8)
Transitional Housing Facilities P P P (8)
Residential Cannabis Cultivation L19 P L19 P L19 See Chapter 6.12 Public and Semipublic Uses
Clubs & Lodges — — S
Community Centers — S S
Day Care Center (15 or more) U U S See Section 18.43.070 Park & Recreation Facilities S S S
Parking Lots S S S
For adjacent office or commercial use only; covered
parking must be at a residential scale.
Public Safety Facilities U U S
Religious Facilities S S S
Residential Care, General S S S (1), (2)
Residential Care, Senior S S S (1), (2)
Schools, Public or Private U U U
Commercial Uses
Bed and Breakfast Establishments Sd Sd Sd See Section 18.43.060 Commercial Recreation L2 L2 —
Food and Beverage Sales U U U
Not to exceed 3,500 sf; no gasoline sales or liquor
stores
Offices, Business & Professional — — S (5), (7)
Retail Cannabis Sales — — — Not permitted
Commercial Cannabis Cultivation — — — Not permitted
Transportation, Communication, and Utilities Uses
Utilities, Minor P P P
Industrial Uses
Cannabis Microbusinesses,
Distribution,
Manufacturing, Processing,
Testing, and Storage
-- -- -- Not Permitted
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) Use Classifications "RE" "RS" "RM" Additional Regulations Agriculture and Extractive Uses
Goat Grazing for fire fuel management Sd Sd Sd
Accessory Uses and Structures See Section 18.43.020
Temporary Uses See Chapter 18.17
Nonconforming Uses See Chapter 18.46
Specific Limitations
L1 Only in RS-3.5 and RS-4 with approval of a site development permit and when in character with the existing or proposed neighborhood and consistent with the general plan density for the subject property.
L2 Golf courses, racquet clubs, health and fitness clubs (public and private) allowed in these residential districts on parcels 5 acres and larger with approval of a use permit.
L19 Indoor cannabis cultivation permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6.12: Cannabis Activity (1) Residential Care Facilities in the "RE" and "RS" Districts shall not exceed the population density that would otherwise result from typical residential development based on the standard of 2.47 persons per household. For example, a 2-acre parcel in a "RS-3" District would be limited to 15 persons receiving care (2x3x2.47=15 persons). (2) In the "RE" and "RS" Districts, any facility over five-thousand (5,000) square feet shall be developed in accordance with the "RM-10" District, except that building height shall not exceed 35 feet.
(3) Site development permit issued by the Director shall be required for development on all parcels within an "RM" District where said parcel was created by a subdivision of five 5 or more parcels.
(4) Single-family prohibited in "RM" District on lots created after adoption of this section except in a "PD" Planned Development District and for small-lot subdivisions. (5) The Director may require buffer yards on side and rear property lines of the office development as specified in Section 18.40.020.
(6) Site development permit issued by the Director shall be required for construction of any units on a parcel without public-street access.
(7) Size limit: five-thousand (5,000) square feet. Limited to conversion of existing structures in "RM-12" through "RM-30" Districts; new construction is allowed in "RM-6" through "RM-10" Districts.
(8) Permitted use subject to consistency with the definition of the use contained in Chapter
18.60. Proposed transitional and supportive facilities that are inconsistent with Chapter
18.60 may be allowed only in the "RM" District subject to first obtaining a site development permit approved by the Board of Administrative Review. (9) Permitted use subject to the requirements of Section 18.43.170 and the condominium subdivision requirements of Chapters 17.30 and 17.34; see Schedule 18.31.030-B for maximum allowable densities.
Section 2. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations), Section 18.40.010 (Antennas and Microwave Equipment; Telecommunications and Wireless Facilities) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
18.40.010 Antennas and Microwave Equipment; Telecommunications and Wireless Facilities
A. Purpose.
1. To ensure that amateur radio antennas and satellite and microwave dish antennas and equipment do not have an adverse impact on aesthetic values and public safety in residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
2. To provide controls for the installation of antennas and microwave equipment.
3. To provide a regulatory mechanism to accommodate the installation and development of telecommunications and wireless communications facilities whose services benefit the residents of Redding.
4. To provide for the appropriate development of telecommunication and wireless facilities consistent with the Federal regulations, with the intention of maximizing the use of existing towers, minimizing the need for new towers, and encouraging the use of alternative tower structures.
5. To minimize the visual impacts that telecommunications and wireless facilities can create in the community through careful siting, design, screening, and camouflaging.
ANTENNA AND MICROWAVE EQUIPMENT REGULATIONS
B. Locational Criteria: Amateur Radio Antennas. An amateur radio antenna may be installed on a lot in any district if it complies with the following criteria:
1. Setbacks. Location in any required front or street side yard or within 10 feet of any other side and rear property line is prohibited.
2. Maximum Height. Twenty feet above the district height limit provided that additional height may be authorized with a use permit.
3. Surface Materials and Finishes. Highly reflective surfaces shall not be permitted.
C. Locational Criteria: Satellite Antennas. A satellite antenna exceeding 24 inches in diameter may be installed on a lot in any zoning district if it complies with the following criteria. Antennas 24 inches or smaller in diameter need not comply with these requirements if they are affixed to the main or accessory structure.
1. Residential and Office Districts.
a. Setbacks. Shall be located on the rear ½ of the lot; shall be at least 10 feet from any rear or side property line; and, in the case of a corner lot, shall not project beyond the front yard required or existing on the adjacent lot and shall be colored to minimize glare. In cases where there are front-yard setbacks greater than 80 feet, the antenna may be located on the middle of the lot provided that a site development permit is obtained in each case.
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) b. Screening. A screen, fence, or earth berm shall be constructed to hide the base of the antenna from view from the street and adjoining front yards in the cases where the antenna is located in the middle of the lot. c. Maximum Height. Twenty feet, measured from ground level immediately under the antenna to the highest point of the antenna in its highest position. d. Abutting Interior Lot. In case of an interior lot abutting upon 2 streets, it shall not be erected so as to encroach upon the front yard required for either street.
2. All Other Districts.
a. Setbacks. Shall not be located closer than 15 feet to any public street as measured from edge of right-of-way.
b. Maximum Height. Thirty-five feet, measured from ground level immediately under the antenna to the highest point of the antenna in its highest position. If mounted on a roof, the antenna shall not extend more than 10 feet higher than the height limit established for the district. c. Screening. The structural base of a satellite antenna, including all bracing and appurtenances, but excluding the dish itself, shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way and any adjoining "R" district by walls, fences, buildings, landscape, or combinations thereof not less than 4 feet high.
d. Undergrounding. All wires and/or cables necessary for operation of the antenna or reception for the signal shall be placed underground, except for wires or cables attached flush with the surface of a building or the structure of the antenna.
e. Surface Materials and Finishes. Highly reflective surfaces shall not be permitted.
f. Advertising. Antennas shall not be used for advertising purposes.
D. Locational Criteria: Microwave Receiving and Transmitting Antennas; Relay Equipment. Microwave antennas and equipment may be installed with a site development permit on any lot in the "GO," "SC," "RC," "GC," "HC," and "PF" Districts except in any required front or street-side setback area. They are permitted in the "GI" and "HI" Districts unless the antennas exceed district height limits, in which case, a site development permit is required. All wires or cables necessary for the operation of the antenna or reception of the signal shall be placed underground, except wires or cables attached flush with the surface of a building or structure of the antenna. Landscape or solid screening shall be placed around the base of any tower to screen the tower from view and to provide a physical separation between the tower and any pedestrian or vehicular circulation.
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND WIRELESS FACILITIES REGULATIONS
E. Compliance with Applicable Codes. Telecommunication and wireless communication facilities constructed in the City of Redding shall comply with all applicable codes and standards.
F. Permits. All telecommunication and wireless communication facilities shall be subject to the following:
1. Zoning Clearance. All building-mounted facilities that comply with the regulations contained in this section.
2. Use Permit. Facilities that require a use permit shall include:
a. All ground-mounted facilities that are not collocated with other similar existing facilities or are within 150 feet of a residential district. b. Collocations that involve the installation of improvements which increase the height of an existing or similar facility by 10 percent or replace or reconstruct a facility no longer considered in conformance with the zoning or building codes.
c. Multiple communication sites proposed by a single applicant, in which case a use permit will serve as a master land permit for all sites under single review by the Planning Commission.
d. Facilities determined to have a potentially significant impact on the neighborhood. In such case, the Director may require an independent thirdparty review, at the expense of the applicant, to confirm the radio frequency needs of the applicant.
e. Facilities that do not comply with the standards of this chapter.
3. Exempt. New facilities that collocate on or within an existing approved tower or other facility, and which comply with all relevant standards for the district in which the facility will be located, and with Federal Section 6409(a) Wireless Facility Siting.
G. Height. All telecommunication and wireless communication facilities shall be of a minimum functional height, but where feasible, allow for future collocation of antenna arrays. Building- mounted facilities shall not exceed 15 feet above the maximum height permitted for the district within which they are located.
H. Minimum Setbacks. Telecommunication and wireless communication facilities, including guy wires and accessory facilities, shall be set back a distance 2 times the height of the tower from any residential district boundary unless a stealth design or site particulars mitigate the visual impact.
I. Preferred Locations. Telecommunication and wireless communication facilities shall be collocated with existing or planned facilities, where feasible or where found to minimize visual impact (regardless of zoning district). Other facilities suitable for collocation may Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) include publicly used structures (water tanks, light standards, etc.), industrial, commercial structures, and mixed-use buildings in urban areas.
J. Prohibited Locations. Telecommunication and wireless communication facilities shall not be located:
1. On the site of any designated Federal, State, or local landmarks.
2. Within 1,500 feet of an existing tower, unless it is on a previously approved collocated facility or multiple-user site, is technologically required, or is visually preferable.
3. Within a residential district, unless building-mounted in a stealth manner, satisfactorily disguised in a stealth structure, or totally enclosed within a building.
K. Visual Compatibility. The following standards of visual compatibility and screening shall apply:
1. All telecommunication wireless communication facilities equipment shall be screened or camouflaged so as to reduce visual impacts. Existing site features shall be used to screen or camouflage the facility where possible.
2. All facilities must be visually compatible with surrounding buildings, structures, and/or uses in the area to the maximum extent feasible.
3. All antennas, towers, or related equipment shall be coated with a non-reflective finish or paint consistent with the background area where the facility is to be placed.
4. Screening for ground-mounted equipment shall include existing and/or new vegetation pursuant to Chapter 18.40.
5. Building-mounted equipment shall be located, painted, and/or architecturally designed so as to be compatible with surrounding buildings and/or uses.
L. Interference. Interference with a public-safety radio system shall not be allowed. Prior to receiving a zoning clearance, site development permit, or use permit, applicants shall submit engineering studies evaluating transmission and radiated output power (to the third harmonic). The studies shall be reviewed by the City's Telecommunications Manager, who shall advise the approving authority on whether the application should be approved or denied based on the results of said study.
M. Technological Progress. When telecommunications technology becomes available and economically viable to allow the height of cell towers to be reduced by 50 percent or more or to allow sites to be eliminated altogether, such facilities shall be upgraded or eliminated within 24 months of a request by the City.
N. Discontinuance of Use. The City shall be notified by the service provider of any intent to discontinue operation no less than 30 days prior to discontinuance. Upon discontinuance Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) of use, all related equipment shall be removed and the property restored to the preconstruction condition within 90 days.
Section 3. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations), Section 18.40.160 (Swimming Pools) is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.40.160 Swimming Pools
A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish property-line setback requirements for swimming pools.
B. Applicability. The provisions of this section apply to the minimum property-line setback requirements for all outdoor swimming pools.
C. Construction Locations.
1. Outdoor Swimming Pools in any "RL" "RE" or "RS" District. a. Swimming pools shall not be constructed within 20 feet (20’) of a front property line; within 15 feet (15’) of the street-side property line of a corner lot; within 5 feet on an interior side-yard property line; within 5 feet (5’) of a rear property line. All setbacks shall be measured from the inside face of the pool wall. See Section 18.40.030 for setbacks for associated pool decking. Exception: Street-side setback may be reduced to 10 feet on lots created and developed prior to October 1, 2002, provided that the pool is constructed behind an existing fence that was constructed in accordance with the setback requirements in effect at the time the fence was constructed.
b. Aboveground/on-ground pools shall be located on the rear half of the lot and not closer than 5 feet (5’) to any side or rear property line. Any associated decking/ladders over 6 inches above grade shall not be located within 5 feet (5’) of a property line.
c. No portion of an in-ground pool shall encroach into the area created by an imaginary line traversing at a 45-degree (45o) angle away from the bottom of the foundation of any residential or accessory structure unless a supporting engineered wall is constructed in conjunction with the pool. d. Swimming pools, pool decking, and mechanical or utility appurtenances for the pool cannot encroach into any open-space easement. Such structures may encroach into a public-utility easement upon first obtaining approval from the City Engineer. If approval is granted, an encroachment permit is required to be issued in conjunction with the swimming pool permit.
2. Outdoor Swimming Pools in any "RM" "GC" or "HC" District. a. Pools intended for multiple-family or business uses shall not be located closer than 15 feet (15’) to any public right-of-way.
3. Indoor Swimming Pools in All Zoning Districts.
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) a. Indoor swimming pools shall be considered as part of the structure and shall meet all applicable setback requirements appurtenant to the structure in which the pool is enclosed.
Section 4. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.40 (Development and Site Regulations), Section 18.40.180 (Walls and Fences) is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.40.180 Walls and Fences
A. Residential Districts
1. Height. Fences or walls in required front-yard
setbacks or within 10 feet (10’) of the property
line in a required street-side setback shall not
exceed 3 feet. All other fences shall not exceed
6 feet (6’) in height, except for along any interior
side- or rear-yard not fronting on a public rightof-way, in which case the fence shall not exceed 7 feet (7’) in height with any attachments to the fence designed to be of similar/compatible architecture and materials as the fence to which it is attached.
However, legal, nonconforming fences may be repaired or replaced. Fence or wall heights between sloped or terraced lots are measured from the grade of the "uphill" side of the fence as shown. Walls and fences required by a site development permit, parcel map, or subdivision may exceed the maximum height limits and minimum setbacks of the zoning district as required by the conditions of approval for the project.
2. Design. In all "RM" Districts, fencing shall be treated as an integral part of the architecture, with materials, colors, and detailing drawn from the building they surround or adjoin. Fences or walls adjacent to freeways, highways, or arterial or collector streets that are required as a condition of development by the City shall be constructed of decorative masonry, concrete-block, concrete-panel, or similar materials. Solid masonry fences or walls shall not be placed within areas of designated one-hundred-year (100-year) floodplain without proper openings to pass floodwaters in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Barbed wire, razor wire, and electric fencing is prohibited in all residential districts unless the Director determines that said fencing is necessary for security, animal containment, or other legitimate purpose and would not be detrimental to the neighborhood in which the property is located.
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) B. Nonresidential Districts
1. Location. Fences or walls shall not be
constructed within a street front or side
setback area unless a site development
permit is approved by the Director.
2. Height. Fences or walls shall not exceed
6 feet (6’) in height unless the Director
determines that additional height is
necessary for screening or security purposes
or due to the topography of the site. In all
other circumstances, a site development
permit shall be obtained to exceed a height of
6 feet (6’). Walls and fences required by the
City as a condition of approval for
development may exceed the maximum
height limits and minimum setbacks of the
zoning district as required by the conditions
of approval for the project.
3. Monitored Electrified Security Fence Systems. “Monitored perimeter security fence system” means a perimeter alarm system with an assembly of batterypowered equipment, including but not limited to: a monitored alarm device and energizer which is intended to periodically deliver pulses to a security fence, a battery charging device used exclusively to charge the system’s battery, and other integrated components. The design, construction, and use of monitored perimeter security fence systems shall be allowed, subject to the following:
a. IEC Standard No. 60335-2-76. Unless otherwise specified herein, monitored perimeter security fence systems shall be constructed and operated in conformance with the specifications set forth in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard No. 60335-2-76, current edition.
b. Power Source. The energizer for monitored perimeter security fence systems must be driven by a commercial storage battery not to exceed twelve (12) volts DC. The storage battery is charged primarily by a solar panel. The solar panel may be augmented by a commercial trickle charger. c. Perimeter Barrier. Monitored perimeter security fence systems shall be installed behind a nonelectrified fence or wall that complies with Section
18.40.180(B).
d. Emergency Gate Access/System Shutoff. Before a monitored perimeter security fence system is activated, a Knox device shall be approved by the fire department. The Knox device will be installed at the main entry gate and fully functional at all times when the monitored perimeter security fence system is operational.
e. Setback. The perimeter security fence shall be set back six (6) inches to twelve (12) inches from the nonelectrified fence or wall in order to prevent Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) inadvertent access to the battery-charged fence.
f. Design/Height. The monitored perimeter security fence shall be visually transparent and comprised of twenty (20) twelve and one-half (12.5) gauge galvanized steel wires which are run horizontally to the height of ten (10) feet, or two (2) feet higher than the perimeter barrier fence, whichever is greater.
g. Warning Signs. Monitored perimeter security fence systems shall be clearly identified with bilingual warning signs that read: “Warning – Electric Fence” at intervals of not less than thirty (30) feet.
h. Location. Monitored perimeter security fence systems shall only be permitted on commercial and industrial zoned properties. i. Police Department Permit Requirements. All monitored perimeter security fence systems shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 9.38 (Burglary and Robbery Alarm System).
j. It shall be unlawful for any person to install, maintain or operate a monitored perimeter security fence system in violation of this chapter or Chapter 9.38 (Burglary and Robbery Alarm System).
k. The monitored perimeter security fence system shall transmit a signal to an alarm monitoring business in response to an intrusion or burglary. The system shall not directly connect to or call law enforcement. The business must first verify the alarm event prior to requesting deployment of law enforcement.
3. Design and Materials. Fencing visible from a street shall be treated as an integral part of the architecture, with materials, colors, and detailing drawn from the building they surround or adjoin. Barbed wire shall not be erected and maintained within 25 feet of any public right-of-way. The use of razor wire or similar materials must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from a right-of-way. Barbed, razor, and similar wires may extend 18 inches above the height limits established by this section. Solid masonry fences or wall shall not be placed within an area of 100- year floodplain without proper openings to pass floodwaters in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Director may approve modifications to the above provisions through issuance of a site development permit.
Section 5. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.41 (Off-Street Parking and Loading), Section
18.41.040 (Off-Street Parking Spaces Required) is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.41.040 Off-Street Parking Spaces Required
All covered and uncovered off-street parking spaces required by Schedule 18.41.040-A shall be improved and maintained in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.
Unless otherwise approved pursuant to Sections 18.41.030(G) or (J), the required parking spaces shall be located on the same building site as the use or building they are intended to serve. Onstreet parking within public or private streets or parking in a driveway shall not be used to satisfy the off-street parking requirement except for planned developments and condominiums or as Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) exempted by the provisions of a specific plan, neighborhood plan, or resolution governing a specific area adopted by the City Council.
Schedule 18.41.040-A: Parking Spaces Required
OFF-STREET PARKING
USE SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Caretakers’ quarters 2 spaces per unit
Animal services 1 space per 350 square feet of gross floor area.
Automotive parts stores 1 space per 350 square feet of gross floor area.
Automotive repair service 1 space per 350 square feet of gross floor area.
Automotive sales 1 space per 2,000 square feet of interior and/or exterior sales, display, or storage area up to a total 20 spaces, plus 1 space.
Bank 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area.
Bar 1 parking space for each 3 seats, plus 1 space for each 40 square feet of dance floor or assembly area.
Boardinghouse 1 parking space per each bedroom plus 2 additional parking spaces overall.
Boat sales 1 space per 2,000 square feet of interior and/or exterior sales, display, or storage area up to a total 20 spaces, plus 1 space.
Bowling alley 4 parking space per each bowling lane plus 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area
devoted to accessory uses.
Bulk retail store 1 parking space for each 600 square feet of gross floor area.
Colleges and trade schools, Public or Private 1 parking space for every 15 square feet in the classroom seating.
Call Centers 1 space for each employee.
Card room 1 parking space for each 2 seats in the play area plus 1 space per 3 seats in any bar or dinner area.
Condominium (residential) 1.5 spaces per on-bedroom or efficiency units, 2 parking spaces per unit for 2 or more-bedroom units,
plus 1 guest parking for each 5 units and 1
recreational-vehicle parking space for each 5 units.
For 2-bedroom condominiums, 1 required space shall
be covered. For 3 or more-bedroom condominiums,
there shall be 2 covered spaces.
Day care center/preschool 1 parking space for each 10 students plus 1 space for each teacher/employee plus 1 passenger loading
space.
Dry cleaners (non-institutional) 1 space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area.
Dwelling groups Parking shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of each individual unit type. (See Single
Family, Two-Family Dwelling, and/or Multiple
Family, as applicable)
Elderly housing .5 space per 1-bedroom unit; .66 space per 2-bedroom unit.
Furniture and large appliance store 1 parking space per 750 square feet of gross floor area.
Golf driving range 1 parking space for each driving tee.
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
USE SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Health club and fitness studio 1 parking space for each 125 square feet of gross floor area for the initial 5,000 square feet of building area. 1 space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area shall be provided for that building area which exceeds
5,000 square feet. 1 parking space shall be provided
for each 350 square feet of enclosed swimming pool
and deck area.
Hospital 1.5 parking spaces per bed and 1 space for every 225 square feet of gross floor area dedicated to outpatient or office use.
Hotel, Residential 1 parking space for each unit, plus 2 spaces.
Industry
a. Assembly (the combining of manufactured parts
to make a completed product)
1 parking space per 750 square feet of gross floor
area.
b. Manufacturing 1 parking space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.
c. Warehouse/distribution 1 parking space for each 1,250 square feet of gross floor area for buildings between -0- and 20, 000
square feet in area; 1 parking space for each 2,000
square feet of gross floor area for the building area
between 20, 000 and 40, 000 square feet, and 1
parking space for each 4,000 square feet of gross floor area for the building area over 40, 000 square feet.
Laundry (coin operated) 1 parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area.
Medical office, clinic, or physical therapy services 1parking space for each 225 square feet of gross floor area. Special requirements for provision of accessible
parking may apply—see Section 18.41.170(A)(1)(c).
Ministorage (self-storage)/long-term, public storage 3 spaces plus 2 spaces for manager’s unit where individual units are accessible by vehicles; 1 space per 10,000 square feet where individual units are not
accessible by vehicles.
Mobile home park 2 parking spaces per unit, 1 of which shall be covered, plus 1 guest space for each 5 units plus 1 recreationalvehicle space for each 5 units.
Mortuary 1 parking space for every 4 seats in the principle seating area plus 3 parking spaces overall, or 1
parking space for each 45 square feet in the principal
seating area, whichever is the greater.
Motel/hotel 1 parking space for each motel unit plus 2 spaces. 5 percent of the required spaces shall be pull through
RV spaces (48 feet by 10 feet, unless an alternative
design can be proven to be as effective).
Multiple-family dwelling 1.5 parking spaces per one-bedroom unit, 1.75 parking spaces per 2-bedroom unit, 2 parking spaces per each
3-bedroom unit, plus 1 guest space for each 5 units
that are provided beyond the initial 30 units, plus
recreational-vehicle spaces equal to 5 percent of the
required number of parking spaces. Recreational
vehicle spaces shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide by
25 feet in length. Required parking in developments
serving low-and moderate-income seniors may be
reduced by 50 percent.
Personal services 1 parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area.
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
USE SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Planned (residential) development 2 covered spaces per unit, plus 1 guest space for each 5 units, plus 1 recreational-vehicle space for each 5
units unless approved otherwise with the Planned
Development Plan. Recreational vehicle spaces shall
be provided in a common parking area maintained by
a homeowner’s association or other approved entity.
Pool and billiard room 1.5 parking spaces for each table.
Professional office 1 parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area.
Real estate office 1 parking space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area.
Religious facilities, social hall, club, lodge,
community center, other public assembly
1 parking space for each 4 seats in the principal
seating theatre area, or 1 parking space for every 40
square feet in the place of principal seating/assembly
area, whichever is the greater, plus 1 passenger
loading space. Each 24 inches of bench-type seating is
to be considered 1 seat.
Research and development 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area.
Residential care, senior and general 1 parking space for each 3 beds.
Restaurant
a. Sit-down 1 parking space for each 3 seats. Up to 30 percent of the number of seats provided indoors may be provided
outdoors without additional required parking,
provided that the number of parking spaces required
for the number of indoor seats is met.
b. Drive-through, fast-food, or self service 1 parking space for each 75 square feet of gross floor area. Required reservoir spaces shall count towards
required parking.
c. Coffee kiosk 1 parking space per window, plus 1 space.
Retail
a. Enclosed 1 parking space for each 300 square feet of gross leasable floor area for single-tenant buildings of
10,000 square feet of floor area or greater and 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross leasable floor are for single-tenant buildings of less than 10,000 square feet of floor area and all multi-tenant buildings. Multitenant buildings may be occupied by any mix of permitted uses and uses permitted with the approval of
a Site Development Permit or Use Permit. (Note:
Parking requirements for shopping centers approved,
by Use Permit, Site Development Permit, or other
discretionary approval shall be determined by the final decision-making body).
b. Outdoor 1 space for each 750 square feet of outdoor display area.
c. Open lot nursery 1 space for each 1,250 square feet of outdoor display area.
Accessory dwelling unit 1 uncovered space (see Section 18.43.140.C.7. for locational requirements and exceptions).
Single-family dwelling 2 covered spaces.
Two-family dwelling 1 covered space per unit plus 1 other space per unit.
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) A. Bicycle Parking. Projects must comply with the short-term and long-term bicycle parking requirements, as applicable, of Section 5.106.4 of the California Green Building Standards Code.
B. Visitor Parking. On-street parking may be counted toward the visitor-parking requirement for planned developments or condominiums provided that the street has an 8- foot-wide parking lane that is not posted or likely to be posted prohibiting parking and that to qualify as one visitor-parking space, there must be an uninterrupted 22-foot-long space and a public sidewalk adjacent to the street.
C. Company Vehicles. Commercial or industrial uses are to provide one parking space for each company vehicle which is parked on the site during normal business hours. Such space may be located within a building.
D. Motorcycle Parking. Facilities with 25 or more spaces may provide motorcycle parking at a rate not exceeding 3 percent of required spaces. Such spaces shall be counted toward meeting the total number of spaces required for the development by this Chapter. Spaces delineated for motorcycle parking shall have a minimum area of four (4) feet by ten (10) feet and shall be identified as a motorcycle space by signs or pavement delineation.
Section 6. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.42 (Signs), Section 18.42.040 (Standards For Certain Types of Signs) is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.42.040 Standards for Certain Types of Signs
A. Accessory Signs. Accessory signs indicating prices, products, or services offered or signs with changeable copy (i.e., gas price) shall be incorporated into the design of approved wall or detached monument or pole signs. All other accessory signs shall be subject to the following regulations:
1. Number. Each lot is allowed two (2) detached accessory signs. Additional accessory-directional signs may be allowed by administrative sign permit.
2. Size. Each sign can be no more than six (6) square feet. Signs exceeding six (6) square feet may be allowed by administrative sign permit, but shall not exceed twenty (20) square feet except that menu boards may be approved up to thirty-two (32) square feet in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.43.080F.
3. Height. Four (4) feet maximum.
4. Setbacks. These signs shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line, and in no case shall such signs violate the setback provisions for street corners or driveways as noted in Subsection 18.43.030(D) of this section.
B. Balloons and Dirigibles. Balloons, dirigibles, or other inflatable devices used primarily for advertising shall require an administrative sign permit when the greatest straight-line distance across the inflated object exceeds three (3) feet or the number of inflated objects exceeds five (5) (except as noted below), or the height of aerial display exceeds twenty (20) feet, whichever is most restrictive. The display shall be limited to no more than fourteen (14) calendar days per year. Inflatables grouped together shall be considered as one dirigible or balloon. Inflatables shall not be released into the air regardless of size and shall not extend over aerial utility lines. Unless a Use Permit has been obtained, balloons Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) and other dirigibles shall not be located on property such that the tether line could overlap the property line in any direction by extending the line horizontally. Latex balloons not exceeding twelve (12) inches in any one direction may be displayed without a permit provided that the number of balloons does not exceed two-hundred (200) and that they are displayed for no more than three (3) consecutive days four (4) times per year; otherwise, an administrative sign permit is required.
C. Buildings in the Shape of Symbols. The maximum allowable surface area of buildings designed in the shape of products or services sold (i.e., doughnut- or hot dog-shaped structures) shall be as approved by a site development permit.
D. Freeway Signs.
1. Size. Freeway signs shall not exceed a maximum sign area of four hundred square feet.
2. Height. Freeway signs shall not exceed sixty feet (60’) in height above surrounding grade; sign height may be increased to a maximum of seventy feet above surrounding grade; if the decision-making body finds that either:
a. Trees to be preserved on-site or located off-site substantially obscure visibility of the sign from the freeway, and the freeway sign conforms to all other provisions of this title; or
b. The elevation of the existing grade immediately adjacent to the freeway sign is below the elevation of a freeway travel lane located no greater than five hundred feet from the sign and the difference in grade cannot be resolved by moving the sign and that difference in grade obscures visibility of the sign from the freeway, and the freeway sign conforms to all other provisions of this title.
3. Location.
a. Freeway signs shall be located as close as possible to the nearest freeway travel lane.
b. Freeway signs shall comply with location requirements applicable under state or federal law, including but not limited to separation requirements.
4. Design and Landscaping.
a. The design of a freeway sign shall be compatible with the shopping center’s architectural style and shall be constructed of decorative and durable materials to reduce the likelihood of unsightly signs and blighted conditions.
b. The design of a freeway sign’s support structures shall be compatible with the overall design of the sign, including but not limited to materials, colors, textures, and scale.
b. The sign cabinet or frame (or equivalent) bottom shall be at least ten feet above grade.
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) c. Landscaping compatible with the shopping center’s landscape design shall be provided around the perimeter of the freeway sign base.
5. Other Provisions.
a. The illuminated face(s) of any freeway sign shall be oriented towards the freeway and shall be oriented away from nearby “Residential” Districts to the maximum extent feasible.
b. Freeway signs located within five hundred feet (500’) of a “Residential” District shall not be illuminated between 12:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. c. At time when none of the businesses advertised on a freeway sign are open for business, the sign shall not be illuminated.
6. Maintenance. All freeway signs shall be maintained in conformance with the following standards:
a. All freeway sign components shall be maintained free of physical damage and deterioration, including but not limited to sign surface, painted/treated stucco and wood, and decorative materials/features.
b. All approved lighting associated with a freeway sign shall be maintained in a fully operational manner. In the event lighting is not fully operational, no portion of the sign shall be illuminated until the lighting has been restored to a fully operational state.
E. Menu Boards
1. Design. The height and orientation of menu boards shall be designed so as not to be visible from a public street.
2. Number. No more than two (2) detached menu boards shall be permitted per drivethrough lane.
F. Monument Signs.
1. Design. Monument signs shall be constructed with a solid decorative base that is flush with the ground at all points along the base of the sign. The amount of opaque area framing the sign copy shall not exceed 100 percent (100%) of the area of the sign copy. An alternative design, not including exceptions to the allowed sign height or size, may be approved by the Development Services Director with approval of an Administrative Sign Permit.
a. Freestanding decorative walls four (4) feet or less in height (such as those used to screen parking lots from the street) can be used as the face of a monument sign. Only externally-illuminated text identifying the business or use of the property with a letter-height not exceeding twelve (12) inches may be used.
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
2. Height and Size. Monument signs shall not exceed 6 feet (6’) in height except when used in lieu of a pole sign, where allowed, and when consistent with the following criteria:
Distance From Street
Right-of-Way (Feet)
Maximum Height
Above Grade (Feet)
Maximum Size Allowed per
Side (Square Feet)
5 7.0 45
8 8.5 60
12 10.0 75
15 and more 12 90
Notes:
1. Monument signs over 35 square feet may not be erected on properties, including shopping centers and similar developments, that have a pole sign. If a monument sign over 35 square feet is erected, a subsequent pole sign shall not be permitted
2. The required setback shall be measured perpendicularly from the street rightof-way line to the nearest portion of the sign face or structure.
3. Monument signs exceeding 90 square feet in area, where allowed, require approval of a Site Development Permit.
3. Setbacks. These signs shall be set back a minimum of five feet (5’) from the property line, and in no case shall such signs violate the setback provisions for street corners or driveways as noted in Subsection 18.42.030(D) of this section.
4. Landscape. All monument signs shall require automatic irrigated landscape at the base equivalent to two (2) times the area of the sign copy.
G. Patriotic Symbols (Flags). Flags of the U.S. are allowed provided that they do not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet and a maximum height of sixteen feet (16’) in residential areas and sixty (60) square feet in commercial areas provided that the height does not exceed forty feet (40’). All other flag types shall require an administrative sign permit, but shall not exceed sixty (60) square feet and thirty feet (30’) in height. Flags or banners with advertising copy shall not be displayed on the same flag pole which displays flags of the United States. Flags of the United States flown in commercial or industrial areas shall be displayed in accordance with the protocol established by the Congress of the United States set for the Stars and Stripes (Public Law 94-344 and 90-831), which includes the provision for night lighting. Any flag not meeting any one of the conditions noted above shall be considered a banner and shall be subject to regulations as such.
H. Pole Sign.
1. Design. The maximum diameter or horizontal distance across a support structure and its enclosure shall not exceed 3 feet (3’) in any one direction. The cabinet, frame, or equivalent structure shall be elevated at least 7 feet (7’) above grade.
2. Height. Pole signs shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. Additional height may be permitted by a Zoning Exception, as specified in Section Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
18.15.030(V), provided that no sign shall exceed a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet in height.
3. Setbacks. The support structure for a pole sign shall be set back a minimum of five feet (5’) from all property lines, and no portion of the sign shall project over the property line. Pole signs with a sign support structure greater than six inches (6”) in diameter shall not be located within the Clear Sight Triangle as defined in Section
18.40.140.
4. Landscape. All pole signs shall be provided with automatic irrigated landscape at the base of the sign equal to the area of the sign.
I. Political and Campaign Signs. Political or campaign signs on behalf of candidates for public office or measures on election ballots are allowed provided that said signs are subject to the following regulations:
1. Said signs may be erected not earlier than ninety (90) days prior to the said election and shall be removed within fifteen (15) days following said election.
2. In any residential zoning district, only one sign is permitted on any one lot. If Detached, the sign shall not exceed six (6) feet in height.
3. In any commercial or industrial district, one or more signs are permitted on a parcel of land provided that all such signs do not, in the aggregate, exceed a sign area of one-hundred-twenty (120) square feet. Said signs shall not be erected in such a manner as to constitute a roof sign. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subparagraph, a sign may be placed upon any legally existing sign structure.
4. No sign shall be located within or over the public right-of-way.
J. Projecting Signs. Projecting signs, including wing wall-mounted signs, shall not project more than three feet (3’) from the facade surface of the building wall or other nonbearing building projection. Signs projecting over the right-of-way require an administrative sign permit.
K. Roof and Mansard Signs. Roof signs shall not project above the roof peak or parapet wall or above the maximum height allowed for the zoning district. Mansard signs shall not project above the mansard. The bottom of roof signs shall be mounted flush with the surface of the roof and shall not interrupt roof lines or other major architectural features.
L. Shopping Center Identifier Signs.
1. Design. The maximum diameter or horizontal distance across a support structure and its enclosure shall not exceed three feet (3’) in any one direction.
2. Height. These signs shall not exceed forty feet (40’).
3. Setbacks. Structures for these signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet (10’) from all property lines, and no portion of the sign shall project over the property line.
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) M. Subdivision and Planned Development Identifier Signs.
1. Design. On-site subdivision-identifier signs shall be monument-type signs incorporated into the entry gates or the wall of the project. Where this is not feasible a freestanding monument sign will be considered.
2. Height. These signs shall not exceed 7 feet (7’) in height.
3. Permit required. The Director shall have the authority to approve subdivision identifier signs with an administrative sign permit if such sign was not approved in conjunction with tentative map or planned development approval.
N. Temporary Off-Site Public Promotion Signs
1. Number of signs. For each nonprofit public organization, four (4) temporary offsite promotion signs are allowed for fund raising events.
2. Time limit. Thirty (30) calendar days per year.
O. Temporary Off-Site Real Estate Development Signs. Temporary off-site real estate signs are permitted subject to obtaining an administrative sign permit for each location and complying with the following regulations:
1. Temporary signs shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area nor six (6) feet in height and must be of monument-type construction.
2. The sign construction shall comply with the construction requirements of the Building Code and shall not be mounted on a vehicle, trailer, or similar portable medium.
3. Each administrative sign permit shall expire two (2) years from the anniversary date of its approval or after the last lot in the subdivision is sold, whichever occurs first.
4. No more than one sign shall be permitted per access point for each development project.
5. Real estate development signs shall only be permitted for residential subdivisions containing ten (10) or more lots and for residential planned developments and residential condominiums containing four (4) or more units.
P. Temporary On-Site Real Estate Signs, Residential.
1. Design. Signs may be pole, monument, or wall signs. Wall signs shall not extend above the parapet, fascia, or roof gutter and shall not be attached to the roof.
2. Number of signs. One temporary on-site real estate sign is allowed.
3. Size. For an individual lot in a residential district, up to six (6) square feet is permitted. For new subdivisions with less than eighty percent (80%) of the lots sold, one sign up to thirty-two (32) square feet is permitted for the subdivision.
4. Height. Signs shall not exceed six (6) feet in height.
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) Q. Temporary On-Site Real Estate Signs, Commercial/Industrial. All commercial and industrial districts may be permitted to have one on-site temporary real estate sign per lot up to thirty-two (32) square feet without an administrative sign permit provided that the setback for monument signs is met, the height does not exceed six feet (6’), and the signs are appropriately maintained.
R. Temporary Signs, Banners, Pennants, and Streamers.
1. One temporary vinyl or cloth banner is allowed per business provided that it is maintained in good condition. Up to three (3) additional banners may be allowed for Grand Opening events with approval of an Administrative Sign Permit.
Temporary signs shall not extend above the parapet, fascia, or roof gutter and shall not be attached to the roof. Banners exceeding twenty-four (24) square feet shall require an administrative sign permit and no banner shall exceed fifty (50) square feet. Banners shall not be displayed for more than fourteen (14) consecutive days two times per year. Banners shall be placed flat against the facade of the building and shall not project above the roof-line of the building. Banners shall not be affixed to public light poles, fences, trees, or similar objects.
2. One strand of pennants or streamers is allowed for the length of each lot frontage without an administrative sign permit, except that the strand(s) shall not contain any advertising copy; and the length of the individual pennants or streamers shall not exceed two feet (2’).
S. Wall Murals and Super-Graphic Wall Signs. Where permitted, wall murals and supergraphic wall signs shall meet the area limitations for the district where they are located and the following regulations:
1. Murals, and super-graphic wall signs shall be pleasing to the eye. The mural or graphic shall demonstrate artistic quality or theme as opposed to direct or indirect illustrative advertising.
2. When bands of color or lines use the wall, building facade, or parapet as either figure or ground, then the entire surface of these areas shall be included as part of the sign or mural area.
3. Any advertising message type, company name, logo, etc., outside the viewing field of the mural shall not exceed twenty (20) square feet in area.
4. Murals shall not be placed on decorative block or brick walls.
5. Approval of the mural by the Director shall take into consideration the visual effect of the mural on adjoining properties and the overall architecture of the building.
The colors and materials used shall be reasonably harmonious with those in the area.
6. Murals shall be limited to a maximum of one per wall on any one building.
7. The proportional relationship of wall signs to the wall shall be based on the maximum square footage or percent of wall and window coverage of Schedule
18.42.030(B), whichever is more restrictive. Wall signs requiring permits shall be Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code) in the form of an administrative sign permit. The Director may require a site development permit if the sign could have an aesthetic impact or be controversial.
T. Wall Signs, Building Mounted. Wall signs shall not extend above the top of the wall or parapet structure. Wall signs shall not have a cumulative area greater than twenty percent (20%) of the area of the wall on which the signs are located.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 8. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.
Section 9. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 21st day of March, 2023, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the _____ day of _________, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
DATE ATTESTED: _________, 2023
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2658 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2658 regarding Zoning Code)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and ratify the letter signed by the Mayor in support of HR 1586, Forest Protection and Wildland Firefighter Safety Act of 2023, which provides a Clean Water Act exemption to the usage of fire retardant to fight wildfires.
Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact on the General Fund as a result of sending the attached letter.
Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to ratify the letter signed by the Mayor, and staff would rescind the letter of support.
Background/Analysis
United States Congressman Doug LaMalfa along with Congressman Jimmy Panetta, introduced HR 1586 – Forest Protection and Wildland Firefighter Safety Act of 2023. The use of fire retardant is a vital tool used by firefighters to battle wildfires. Providing a Clean Water Act exemption so that federal, state, local, and tribal firefighting agencies can continue to use retardant is necessary to keep this tool available. Retardant slows the spread of fire, protects homes, infrastructure, and communities by creating a boundary line of attack for fire crews. To meet the urgent deadline of review of the legislation, the attached letter has already been sent to Congressman LaMalfa expressing the City of Redding’s support of HR 1586.
Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore no further action is required.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.1(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(a)--Ratify Letter of Support for HR 1586
Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 103
Report to Redding City Council March 24, 2023
Re: 4.1(a)--Ratify Letter of Support for HR 1586 Page 2 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Letter of Support - HR 1586
Packet Pg. 104
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
[email protected]
530.225.4447
March 21, 2023
The Honorable Doug LaMalfa
U.S. House of Representatives
408 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Re: Support - HR 1586, Forest Protection and Wildland Firefighter Safety Act of 2023 Dear Congressman LaMalfa,
We are pleased to announce the City of Redding’s support for HR 1586, Forest Protection and Wildland Firefighter Safety Act of 2023. We appreciate your leadership on this critical issue and that the legislation has strong bipartisan support.
The use of retardant is a vital tool that our firefighters need to have at their disposal. Providing a Clean Water Act exemption so that federal, state, local, and tribal firefighting agencies can continue to use fire retardant is necessary to keep this tool available. Our fire-prone communities are at risk every year from the threat of wildfire. It is critical for the survival of our communities, forests, and the safety of fire crew members to utilize retardant when deemed necessary. We have seen time and again, using retardant slows the spread of fire, protect homes, infrastructure, and communities by creating a boundary line of attack for fire crews.
It is imperative that we maintain our ability to fight wildfires effectively. Limiting firefighting agencies’ ability to slow fires will harm forest conservation, endangered species protection, historic site preservation, and our mission to protect nearby residents.
Whether dropped from a plane, sprayed from a tanker truck, or hand applied by private homeowners, retardant is a tool that keeps our communities safe and our watersheds from being destroyed by damaging catastrophic wildfires. In the wildland-urban interface, we need this tool to protect critical infrastructure and human life.
We support your efforts on HR 1586. For any questions, please contact City of Redding City Manager Barry Tippin at (530)225-4060 or via electronic mail: [email protected]. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Michael P. Dacquisto
Mayor
City of Redding
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: ^Letter of Support - HR 1586 (4.1(a)--Ratify Letter of Support for HR 1586)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the Mayor to send a letter to legislators affirming opposition to Senate Bill (SB) 423, which proposes to limit local government control by requiring overreaching ministerial approval of certain multi-family housing developments, allowing for the bypassing of the California Environmental Quality Act, and eliminating public input; and authorize additional letters of opposition for future legislation that may continue to place limits on, or support of legislation that encourages, the authority of local government to maintain control of realistic zoning and permitting within the community.
Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact on the General Fund as a result of sending the attached letter.
Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to authorize the Mayor to send the letter and provide alternative direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
California Senator Scott Wiener is proposing Senate Bill (SB) 423 – Streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) expansion.
This would greatly expand SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) provisions and eliminate the Jan. 1, 2026, sunset date, and thereby permanently requiring cities to ministerially approve certain housing projects without public input or environmental review. This bill forces cities to approve certain housing projects without regard to the needs of the community, opportunities for environmental review, or public input. While it may be frustrating for some developers to address neighborhood concerns about traffic, parking, and other development impacts, those directly affected by such projects have a right to be heard. As stated in the letter of opposition, MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(b)--Letter of Opposition for Senate Bill 423 Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 106
Report to Redding City Council March 24, 2023
Re: 4.1(b)--Letter of Opposition for Senate Bill 423 Page 2 public engagement also often leads to better projects. Not having such outlets will increase public distrust in government and result in additional ballot measures that limit housing development. As drafted, this bill ties the hands of local governments in making practical decisions about residential development in their communities. As such, the attached letter establishes a position of opposition to SB 423.
In addition to establishing the above noted position of opposition for SB 423, staff requests further authorization to prepare letters of opposition to legislation that limits local control of planning and development and support of legislation that continues to encourage local control.
Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
SB 423 (Wiener) Opposition Letter
Packet Pg. 107
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
[email protected]
530.225.4447
April 5, 2023
The Honorable Scott Wiener
Chair, Senate Committee on Housing
1021 O Street, Suite 3330
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 423 (Wiener) Streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments:
SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) Expansion.
Notice of Opposition
Dear Senator Wiener:
The City of Redding writes to express its opposition to your measure, SB 423, which would greatly expand SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) provisions and eliminate the Jan. 1, 2026 sunset date.
On any given day, newspaper headlines in California and across the nation are highlighting the state’s growing housing supply and affordability crisis. Seven in ten Californians view housing affordability as one of the top problems in their communities, and there is growing concern from residents that housing prices are so expensive, younger generations will be priced out of ever being able to buy a home.
The Redding community intimately understands this crisis as it plays out in our community every day. Local leaders are working to find creative solutions so homes of all income levels can be built.
We are taking on this difficult and complex task, and are successfully planning and implementing plans for a diversified housing market to equitably address the housing crisis in our community.
SB 423 is the latest overreaching bill. This measure would double-down on the recent trend of the state overriding its own mandated local housing plans by forcing cities to approve certain housing projects without regard to the needs of the community, opportunities for environmental review, or public input. While it may be frustrating for some developers to address neighborhood concerns about traffic, parking, and other development impacts, those directly affected by such projects have a right to be heard. Public engagement also often leads to better projects. Not having such outlets will increase public distrust in government and result in additional ballot measures that limit housing development.
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: SB 423 (Wiener) Opposition Letter (4.1(b)--Letter of Opposition for Senate Bill 423) The City of Redding actively works with its developers and seeks out those who will continue to build and grow our housing market in a way that is smart for the community. We value the input we receive from the public as it provides guidance in the best ways to serve them. This bill would limit our ability to make smart development decisions for our growing community and eliminate the ability for the public to voice meaningful concerns about the space in which they live, work, and play.
Instead of continuing to pursue top-down, one-size-fits-all legislation, lawmakers should partner with local officials. The League of California Cities is calling on the Governor and lawmakers to include a $3 billion annual investment in the state budget to help cities prevent and reduce homelessness and spur housing development. Targeted, ongoing funding is the only way cities can find community-based solutions that get our residents off the streets and keep them in their homes.
California will never produce the number of homes needed with an increasingly state driven, byright housing approval process. What is really needed is a sustainable state investment that matches the scale of this long-term crisis.
For these reasons, the City of Redding respectfully opposes your measure, Sincerely,
Michael Dacquisto
Mayor
City of Redding
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: SB 423 (Wiener) Opposition Letter (4.1(b)--Letter of Opposition for Senate Bill 423)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services and Consulting Agreement (C-9479) with No Boundaries Transitional Housing, Inc. (No Boundaries), increasing the contract by $551,310 and thereby increasing the total amount of the contract to $933,300, and extending the term to December 31, 2023;
(2) Find that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(d) Existing Facilities; and (3) Find that the National Environmental Policy Act operating costs are categorically excluded, not subject to §58.5, and require no further environmental study or approval from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Fiscal Impact
As proposed, the No Boundaries contract increase of $551,310 will be funded from a combination of Housing Division funding resources that include but are not limited to Permanent Local Housing Allocation, Successor Housing Agency, Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program, Affordable Housing Loan Funds, and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Utilizing these funding sources will have no impact to the General Fund.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize the contract amendment. This would severely reduce the number of interim housing units available within the community.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.2(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement C-9479 with No Boundaries Transitional Housing, Inc.
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 110
Report to Redding City Council March 29, 2023
Re: 4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries Page 2
Background/Analysis
The City of Redding (City) has been working on several initiatives to assist the unsheltered within the community. One important initiative involves increasing the number of low barrier shelter units with supportive services and/or case management. On August 2, 2022, the Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (Contract) with a non-profit provider for a term of six months in an amount not-to-exceed $235,000. On September 14, 2022, the City executed the contract with No Boundaries securing 32 supportive housing units with a total of 50 beds.
In November 2002, City staff was contacted by the provider with a request to increase the number of units from 32 to 46, providing 26 more beds and offering additional support to the Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) and its efforts to house the unsheltered. On November 21, 2022, a first amendment to the contract was completed thereby increasing the budget to $294,360 and securing the additional beds. Under this same amendment, the City Manager was authorized the ability to extend the contract and increase the budget as a minor amendment to the contract. A second amendment was executed on February 21, 2023, which provided an additional month extension to the contract and increased the total contract to $349,560. On March 28, 2023, a third amendment was executed providing an extension of the contract through April 15, 2023. The third amendment increased the total contract to $381,990 and includes a negotiated increase in the room rate between No Boundaries and the property owner. At the current time, all 46 housing units are at full capacity.
The subject fourth amendment seeks to extend the contract through December 2023 and increases the budget by $551,310 for a total contract amount of $933,300.
Environmental Review
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (d) (existing facilities). Authorization of the contract will not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. In addition, the National Environmental Policy Act does not apply to this project as operating costs are categorically excluded and require no further environmental study or approval from HUD.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
Contract C-9479
Contract C-9479 - First Amendment
Contract C-9479 - Second Amendment
Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment
Packet Pg. 111
Report to Redding City Council March 29, 2023
Re: 4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries Page 3
Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment
Packet Pg. 112
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Contract C-9479 (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Boundaries) Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - First Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Second Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Second Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Third Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Contract C-9479 - Fourth Amendment (4.2(b)--Fourth Amendment to Professional Services and Consulting Agreement, No
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5356, Current Transformers:
(1) Accept the apparent low bid by Anixter, Inc., and award to Anixter, Inc. for an annual evaluated cost of $648,813.06, not including sales tax. The contract period shall be from April 4, 2023, through March 31, 2024;
(2) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the bid award annually with Anixter, Inc., through March 31, 2028, if mutually agreeable and as budget allows, with all terms and conditions remaining the same and price adjustments made in direct proportion to a Producer Price Index; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve changes to future pricing terms and policies as needed due to inflation and unstable economic conditions.
Fiscal Impact
Funding for the purchase of current transformers was included in Redding Electric Utility’s adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Staff will incorporate current transformer costs for future years as part of biennial budget requests.
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to award the bid to Anixter, Inc., and provide alternative direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
On Monday, March 6, 2023, three bids were opened for current transformers. In the evaluation process, staff analyzed the bids based on the bid price and compliance with specifications. The apparent evaluated low bid was from Anixter, Inc., for $648,813.06, not including sales tax.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 188
Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2023
Re: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers Page 2 This is a routine bid for current transformers through March 31, 2024, with up to four one-year contract extensions on an as-needed basis, subject to the availability of budgeted funds. These current transformers are required to support new and existing commercial services and replace the existing, aging current transformers in service.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Bid Schedule No. 5356 - Tabulation of Bids
Anixter Quotation Proposal form
Packet Pg. 189
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: ^Bid Schedule No. 5356 - Tabulation of Bids (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers) Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Anixter Quotation Proposal form (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5356- Current Transformers)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the list of qualified on-call consultants to provide professional services related to City of Redding Electric Utility, consistent with City Manager Policy No. 22-03, Selection of Technical Consultants.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact from this recommendation. Funding for the future use of on-call consultants will be determined per contract and subject to budget availability.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve the recommendation and provide alternative direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
Since May 2010, the City of Redding's (City) Engineering Division has utilized the "On-Call Professional Engineering and Architectural-Related Services List" to expedite the delivery of projects by providing a resource of preapproved consultants. Based on this success, Redding Electric Utility (REU) developed a similar list in 2018 and desires an updated list for 2023. The use of this list will expedite the delivery of projects over the next five years by providing a resource of preapproved consultants to deliver on-call services for projects utility-wide, including:
• Resource planning and energy management.
• Transmission and distribution asset management.
• Utility engineering and operations.
• Federal, state, and regional compliance.
• Power operations, including natural gas generation.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 201
Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2023
Re: 4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List Page 2 To accomplish this, staff solicited Statements of Qualifications (SOQ), through Request for Qualifications 5340, for on-call professional and technical services. While a consultant must be on the list to be selected for on-call services, it does not guarantee that a consultant will be asked to submit on any project or receive any assignments. The volume of work assigned to consultants will depend on City staff’s workloads and funding availability.
Consultants will provide services as authorized and directed by the City under the standard Consulting and Professional Services Contract (CPSC). The consultant offering the best combination of expertise and value will be selected to provide the service. No services will be performed on any project until the City has approved and signed the CPSC for that particular project. No CPSC will exceed $200,000, nor will a consultant's work in any specific project be more than $200,000 unless further authorized by the Council. Large and/or complex projects will continue to go through the City's formal qualifications-based selection process by City Manager Policy 22-03, Selection of Technical Consultants.
A total of 11 consultants submitted SOQs for 50 professional disciplines. Subject-matter experts within REU reviewed the SOQs and recommended the consultants who were qualified. This process determined that 11 of the 11 consultants submitting SOQs would be eligible for the oncall list. Many of these firms have previously completed work successfully for the City. The remaining firms demonstrated the experience and qualifications necessary to create a successful work history with the City. The recommended firms are listed in the attachment.
Due to the breadth of the scope of the services requested, REU may consider re-opening the SOQ for a short time to expand the list.
The development of the On-Call List for electric utility services was qualifications-based and is consistent with City Manager Policy 22-03, Selection of Technical Consultants. On-call lists have proven to be a valuable tool for the City and will allow REU to expedite project delivery, saving time and money.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century - Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today's residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.
Attachments
On-Call Services List of Qualified Consultants 2023
22-03 CM Policy Selection
Packet Pg. 202
City of Redding
2023 On-Call Consultants for
Electric Utility-Related Services
Archer Energy Solutions, LLC
EDM International, Inc.
FERCo (Fossil Energy Research Corporation)
GDS Associates, Inc.
NewGen Strategies & Solutions
Optimal Energy
Pace Engineering
PCS (Proven Compliance Solutions)
SEL (Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories)
SHN
Ulteig
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: On-Call Services List of Qualified Consultants 2023 (4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List) Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: 22-03 CM Policy Selection (4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List) Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: 22-03 CM Policy Selection (4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List) Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: 22-03 CM Policy Selection (4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List) Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: 22-03 CM Policy Selection (4.5(b)--Approve 2023 On-Call Professional Services List)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860) with Orcom Solutions LLC dba VertexOne Business Services, the current provider of the hosted Customer Information System (CIS) billing system for all City of Redding utilities, upgrading the current VSSP (customer web portal) platform to the VertexOne Digital product in the amount of $60,614 for a one-time implementation fee and monthly subscription fee of $2,420; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute any necessary documents and amendments to complete the work.
Fiscal Impact
Adequate funding is available in Redding Electric Utility’s current biennial Customer Information System (CIS)/Orcom Maintenance budget. Costs for the project include a $60,614 one-time implementation fee and a monthly subscription fee of $2,420.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve upgrading the customer web portal and provide alternative direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
Since 2014, Orcom Solutions LLC dba VertexOne Business Services (VertexOne) has provided the hosted VXcis (formerly eCIS+) billing software solution, including a base VSSP customer web portal. The current portal offers City of Redding utility customers limited ability to obtain usage and billing information and interact with the CIS. VertexOne’s newest online portal offers customers expanded access to detailed utility account information and insights in an easy-to-use form. It allows utilities to broadcast messages based on account information, offering an enhanced capability to communicate with customers proactively. This upgrade will provide customers access to a more robust self-service portal.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C5860) with Orcom Solutions LLC dba VertexOne Business Services (“VertexOne”) Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 208
Report to Redding City Council March 29, 2023
Re: 4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)Page 2 Upgrading to VertexOne Digital, a customer engagement tool, builds the necessary foundation for future capabilities such as online billing, bill print, or recurring credit card payments. Staff anticipates returning to the Council in the late spring of 2023 with requests regarding those future customer billing and payment options.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Second Amendment to Master Service Agreement (C-5860)
C-5860 First Amendment
C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement
Packet Pg. 209
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Second Amendment to Master Service Agreement (C-5860) (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Second Amendment to Master Service Agreement (C-5860) (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: C-5860 First Amendment (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860)) Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: C-5860 Vertex Master Service Agreement (4.5(c)--Approve the Second Amendment to the Master Services Agreement (C-5860))
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the grant from the State of California Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program in the amount of $72,320 to fund programs that enhance officer wellness and mental health; and Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 84th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078.
Fiscal Impact
This grant does not require matching funds. There is no negative fiscal impact in accepting this grant.
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve acceptance of the grant. The Redding Police Department would lose the opportunity to improve the well-being of officers.
Background/Analysis
With the passage of the Budget Act of 2022, the Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program was established which provides $50 million for city and county law enforcement agencies to use to improve officer wellness and expand mental health sources. Funding has been distributed on a pro-rata basis to law enforcement agencies throughout the State of California, and the Redding Police Department (RPD) received $72,314.51. All funds must be expended by December 1, 2025. The funds must be used to improve the wellness and mental health of sworn officers. Per the statute, the funding may be used for any of the following purposes:
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.9(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.9(a)--Accept and Appropriate funds for the Wellness and Mental Health Grant from the State of California
Bill Schueller, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 280
Report to Redding City Council March 29, 2023
Re: 4.9(a)--Wellness and Mental Health Grant Page 2
• Establishing or expanding officer wellness units
• Establishing or expanding peer support units
• Services provided by a licensed mental health professional, counselor, or other professional who works with law enforcement
• Expanding multiagency mutual aid programs focused on officer wellness and mental health
• Other programs and services that are evidence-based or have a successful track record of enhancing officer wellness
There was no application process nor is there a grant agreement to be signed for this grant. The grant program will be administered by California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). There are requirements that include reporting utilization of the funds as well as the results of the program throughout the grant period. The BSCC will report the results to Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST). Over the next several months, RPD will evaluate the best use of the funding.
Environmental Review
Accepting the grant is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, therefore, no further action is required at this time.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 281
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 84 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078
APPROPRIATING $72,320 FOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICER WELLNESS AND MENTAL HEALTH GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:
FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
111 450 Police Grants $72,320
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:
USE SOURCE
OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase Revenue
111-450-6-1200-09 State Grant Operating - Police $ 72,320 Increase(Decrease) Expenditures
111-450-4739-30 Designated Expenses $ 72,320
Total $ 72,320 $ 72,320
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $72,320 for State of California officer wellness and mental health grant for fiscal year 2022-23.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 4th day of April, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.9(a)--Wellness and Mental Health Grant)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5345 (Job No. 9618-83) Shastina Ranch Park:
(1) Award to SNL Group, Inc. in the amount of $2,460,708.34 for the Base Bid, and an additional $62,000 for the Additive Alternate 3 (Landscape Maintenance-Base Bid); (2) Approve an additional $365,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) Approve $246,000 to provide construction contingency funding; and (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000.
Fiscal Impact
Funding for the Shastina Ranch Park (Project) comes from the Park Development Fund.
Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Construction Contract + 10% Contingency $2,768,708.34
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $365,000
Additional City Manager Authority $50,000
Total Project Costs $3,183,708.34
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 (Job Order No. 9618-83 ) Shastina Ranch Park Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 283
Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2023
Re: 4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the Shastina Ranch Park and provide staff with alternate direction. Without this project, the City of Redding (City) will be in conflict with the attached park development agreement.
Background/Analysis
In 2005, the City Council approved a development agreement with the Shastina Ranch Partners to construct the Shastina Ranch Subdivision, a large residential project west of Airport Road, south of Rancho Road, and adjacent to the proposed southerly extension of Shasta View Drive.
The Shastina Ranch project includes the development of 446 single-family residential units, a neighborhood park with a multipurpose playing field on approximately 11 acres, restroom and play equipment, and 25 acres within the Clover Creek floodplain with a Clover Creek trail to be located within the open space area.
The development agreement included a park development fee credit agreement, C-4327. The park development fee agreement was amended a few times over the years and most recently in 2021.
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on March 16, 2023, for the Shastina Ranch Park Project. The low base bid in the amount of $2,460,708.34 was received from SNL Group, Inc., of Redding, California. Due to funding constraints, this project was bid with several additive alternatives. It was decided to also award Additive Alternative 3, which is a one-year maintenance contract for work completed within the base bid. SNL Group, Inc., provided a bid in the amount of $62,000 for Additive Alternative 3 for a total contract costs of $2,522,708.34.
The engineer's estimate, including Additive Alternative 3, was $2,385,000.
This project includes the construction of park facilities including storm drains, a sanitary sewer system, a domestic water system, electrical infrastructure, paving and hardscape, an irrigation system, landscaping, picnic and BBQ areas, restroom facilities, fencing, a hard court, play equipment, and other miscellaneous items of work.
Environmental Review
On July 5, 2005, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S-7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD-5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report EIR-1-03 on April 5, 2005. The park project was included in the project scope.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 284
Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2023
Re: 4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park Page 3 Attachments
^Location Map
^Bid Tab
C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement
Previous Staff Report 070505
Previous Staff Report 040505
Packet Pg. 285
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: C-4327_2021 Park Development Agreement (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) ITEM NO.
6 -]MEETING
DATE '7-5-
05 APPROVED
BY ~ C .Y MANA
ER
DATE:
CODE:
FROM:
SUBJECT: CITY OF
REDDING REPORT TO CITY
COUNCIL June 15,
2005S101-057/G030-010/L-010-211-012/
L-010-230 Development Services
Department-- Planning Public Hearing reShastina
Ranch Subdivision and Development Agreement;
Adopt Resolution for Tentative Subdivision Map
ApplicationS-7-03 and
Planned Development Application PD-5-04;
Adopt Resolution for General Plan Amendment Application GPA4-03; Offer Ordinance
for First Reading for Rezoning Application RZ-8-03; and Offer Ordinance for First Reading for Shastina Ranch Development Agreement RECOMMENDATION At the conclusion of the public heating, itis the recommendation ofthe Planning Commission that the City Council adopt thetwo attached resolutions and accept the twoattached
ordinances
for first reading by title only for approval of the applications constituting the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project and development. agreement. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project Project) andrecommended that the City Council determine that the necessary findings arein evidence and that the Council approve the applications constituting the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project, and approve the associated Development Agreement between the City and the Project applicant. OnApril 15, the City Council adopted a resolution and findings for certification of EIR-1-03 and deferred action on the Project application pending a heating bythe Shasta County Airports Land UseCommission ( ALUC). This heating was necessary since theProject also necessitates an amendment to the Redding Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)
to'ensure consistency between that plan andthe City' s General Plan. On May 26, 2005, the ALUC unanimously approved the CLUP amendment. PROJECTDESCRIPTION The Pro. ject proponents have requested approval ofa proposal tosubdivide approximately 224 acres to create 446 single-family residential homes; a7.6-acre public park;61 acresof open space; and 20 acres ofindustrial land. The open space will encompass the Clover Creek floodplain corridor, steep slopes along the west Project boundary, and areas of wetlands. The Project will also include the extension of Shasta View Drive between Rancho Road and Airport Road. The subdivision proposal requires an amendmentofthe Redding General Plan andrezoning
actions to achieve General Plan
consistency and establisharchitectural
and site-development guidelines. Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 070505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 2 June 15, 2005
A Development Agreement between the City of Redding and the Shastina Ranch Development Company, Inc.
Generally, the proposal is for a 446-1ot subdivision with lot sizes ranging between6,600 and14,000 square feet. The planned development plan describes fiveneighborhoods distinguished by lot and home size. Four neighborhoods are for model homes between1,200 and2,800 square feet insize; oneneighborhood is for custom homes. The Project is illustrated by the attached Shastina Ranch tentative subdivision map and planned development plan. Distinctive features include varying model home architecture, including two- story and side-entry garage models; six-foot landscape parkways with extensive tree planting along all streets; decorative paving and landscape at strategic street intersections to provide traffic calming; decorative streetlights and integrated design instreetscape, monumentation, and bridge features. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Project applications are accompanied bya development agreement between the applicant and the City. The main focus of theagreement isthe developer' sconstruction ofthe 7.6-acre public parkconcurrent with the Project development in exchange for park fee credit and use of City property for construction ofa section of Shasta View Drive. The agreement also provides that a landscape maintenance district will be formed for maintenance ofthe park; asmall portion of the park may be used for stormwater detention, and the developer will construct 1.3 miles of public trail along Clover Creek.
Attachment "B" provides further details onthe agreementpoints. Attachment "F" provides the implementing
development agreement ordinance. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/ REZONING The Project necessitates a General Plan amendment tochange the land use classification of 101.5acres on that portion of the Project site on the east sideof Clover Creek from "General Industry" ( 82.6acres) and "Residential, 1to 2dwelling units per acre" ( 18.9 acres) to "Residential, 2 to 3.5units per acre." All of the Project area on the west side of CloverCreek iscurrently Residential, 2to3.5 units per acre." The proposed 446 lots represent a density of 2.6units peracre. Along the east Project boundary, 20.8 acres would remain classified " General Industry"; this area lies between an existing overhead 115 kV PG&E power line and industrial property adjacent to Airport Road. The Clover Creek floodplain andsteep slopes along the west Project boundary would remain in the "Greenway" classification. Attachments " K" and "L" illustrate the existing and proposed General Plan land use classifications on the property. The Project includes rezoning actions to coincide withthe General Plan amendment andto apply the PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the entire Project site. Essentially, this consists of rezoning the property on the east side ofClover Creek to "RS-3" Residential Single Family District. The "PD" District will serve to establish site andarchitectural guidelines as contained in the planned development plan. The "PD" District is also necessary to permit minor deviations to thelot width 70 feet) and lot area (7,000 square feet) of the "RS-3" District for about 200 of the lots on the east side of the creek. For the most part, these deviations are for width or area reductions of 10 percent ofless. The existing and proposed zoning of the
Project
site areillustrated on Attachments " M"and " N."ISSUES The underlying objective of the applicant isto create aplanned community offive neighborhoods distinguished by lot size and Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 070505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 3 June 15, 2005
to foster cohesiveness among the neighborhoods. The Planning Commission did not identify any major issues of conformance with the General Plan or standard development policies. The main Project issues were previously considered by the Council in conjunction with certification of the Project EIR. A discussion of these issues is presented in Attachment "A." They are:
Conformance with General Plan Goals.
Transportation and Circulation.
Eminent Domain for Shasta View Drive.
Consistency with Airport Land Use Plan.
Loss of Industrial Land.
Drainage/Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (
ACID).Public Park/Landscape
Maintenance District. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT/ FINANCING A primary consideration of the project isfinancing of improvements necessary tomitigate the project's traffic impacts at the intersection ofChmrt Creek Road/ Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road. This intersection is presently operating at a level of service on the verge of warranting signalization. The Project trafficstudy concludes that some an~ountofdevelopment may occur without significantly degrading the existing service level of the intersection,butthat before Project buildout, signalization will be necessary. Due to the close spacing of Victor Avenue and Rancho Road, reconstruction and signalization of
the intersection are major undertakings.The Project would contribute approximately 17 percent of the traffic atthe Chum Creek Road/ Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road. The potential deficiency oftheintersection is substantially caused by existing citywide traffic. The service levelof the intersection wouldbe potentially further degraded by anticipated development of other large parcels in theRancho Road/ Shasta View Drive area. The necessary improvement of the intersection is a
major construction project and beyond thefinancial scope of any individual residential development anticipated inthe area. To ensure that a funding mechanism will be inplace that will satisfy thefair-share or "proportionality" standard ofaproject requirement and provide some surety ofthe timely construction of the intersection improvements, the following condition is included in the recommended conditionsof project approval. Itis
based upon required mitigation identified in the Project EIR:38. a. The developer shall pay the Citywide Transportation Development Impact Fee inaccordance with Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code.Prior to filing ofafinal map forresidential development orissuance of entitle: ment or building permit for development of the industrial land, the applicant, owner, or successor in interest shall agree toparticipate with theCityof Reddingna funding mechanism toensure the
construction ofimprovements at the Chum Creek Road/Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersections as :necessary to maintain acceptable level- of-service operations. The applicant, owner, or successor ininterest shall agreeto participate in this funding mechanism at a
level equivalent tothe project' spro rata share of the improvements. Co Notwithstanding ( b) above, up to a maximum of 120 lots may berecorded onthe east side of Clover Creek with sole access from Airport Road ( i.e., no crossing of Clover Creek) prior to final establishment ofa funding mechanism for the
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 070505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 4 June 15, 2005
facility fee, established by the City Council or its designee equal to the project's pro rata share of the intersection improvements, shall be made at the time of issuance ofa'building permit.
This condition requires that the project will contribute its fair share to finance the intersection improvements. The final funding mechanism will take the form of an assessment district, benefit fee district, reimbursement agreement, or some combination thereof. In essence, what will be created is a "localized" traffic impact fee program. Such a district(s) may also include the signal at Rancho Road/Alta Mesa
Drive. The City has already initiated acontact with atraffic consultant forpreliminary design work on thenecessary intersection improvements. Attachment 'T' provides amap illustrating large undeveloped parcels in the area of the Project site that may be included in a future assessment or benefit fee district based upon their development potential that wouldgenerate traffic at the intersection. At a
minimum, staff anticipates those largeundeveloped parcels south of Rancho Road and west of the Shasta View Drive extension in the vicinity of Shastina Ranch to be included. Other potential properties include undeveloped residential parcels and acommercial site north of Rancho Road, industrial land along Airport Road, and commercial parcels at the I-5/ South Bonnyview Road interchange. In accordance with State and City regulations, propertyowner notification and public heatings would be apart of any iprocess establishing abenefit fee or assessment district. In regard to Condition 38c, an analysis by the Project traffic consultant of allowing up to120 lots to develop east of CloverCreek with soleaccess offAirport Road (i.e., no extension of Shasta View Drive) concludes thatthis levelofdevelopment would have negligible impact on the operation ofthe Chum Creek Road/Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersection.
Development ofthese lots asthe initial phase ofthe project isprojected to increase the average peak- hour delay atthe intersection bya
maximum of 4.8
seconds. The Project EIR identifiesan additional
delay of less than 5.0seconds as below the threshold of significant impact. The sole Airport Road access results inadistribution of traffic more reliant upon Airport Road than the Rancho Road/ Chum Creek Road corridor. The traffic
consultant'sanalysis is provided in Attachment "J."The requirements of Condition 38 are consistent with General Plan policies in regard tofinancing necessary citywide traffic improvements, both in termsoftiming and fair-share allocation. General Plan policy acknowledges that temporary reductions in thedesired level-of-service goals will occur while financing is developed toconstruct traffic improvements of area or regional benefit. It is generally understood that with a
fee-based program, someimprovements will lag behind development, since fees are typically collected from development at the time ofissuance of building permits. During this lag time, thelevelsof
service may
decrease until enough funds
are accumulated to accomplish the improvement. REQUIRED FINDINGS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR-1-03As noted, the Project EIR was previously certified by the City Council. The following findings are incorporated into the resolution for approval of the tentative map and planned development plan application and the ordinance for approval ofthe development agreement: 1. The project is within the scope ofthe Project defined in Final Environmental Impact Report Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 070505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 5 June 15, 2005
o
Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in Final Environmental Impact Report EIR1-03.The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in Final Environmental Impact Report
EIR- 1-03.SHASTINA
RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT A General Plan amendment andrezoning are legislative acts and, therefore, specific findings for approval are not required other than the above environmental findings. Certain findings must be found to be in evidence to support approval of a tentative map as set forth inthe State Government Code, a Planned Development as set forthin Chapter 18.53 ofthe City Zoning Ordinance, and a Development Agreement as set forth in Chapter 18.20 of the City Zoning Ordinance. These findingsof approval are delineated in the resolutionand ordinance ofl~red for approval of theProject and development agreement and attached tothe report ( Attachments "
E"and "F"). ALTERNA TIVES AND IMPLtCATIONS OF THE
AL TERNA TIVES At the conclusion ofthe public hearing, the City Council has the following altematives:SHASTINA
RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT Determine that the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project and Development Agreetnent as described in this report and the record is within the scope of the Project as defined inFinalEIR1-03. (Planning Commission Recommendation) Approve the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project, consisting ofthe following elements, by adoption ofthenecessary resolutions and ordinances provided as Attachments " C," " D," "E,"
and "F." ( Planning Commission Recommendation)
Tentative Subdivision Map ApplicationS7-03.General
Plan Amendment Application GPA4-03.Rezoning Application RZ-8-03.Planned Development Plan PD-5-04.Shastina Ranch Development Agreement. The tentative map conditions of approval are provided as Attachment " G."o Approve inconcept the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project with modifications tothe tentative map, planned development plan, orother element of the Project applications.
Staff would return with revised resolutions and/or ordinance necessary to support the modifications. Deny theShastina Ranch Subdivision Project based upon a determination that the tentative map, planned development plan, General Plan amendment, and rezoning are not consistent with the General Plan or that the Project would be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the public. The Council should be specific inthe
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 070505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 6 June 15, 2005
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of staffthat the Project demonstrates conformance with the City's General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance as outlined in this staff report and attachments. Further, it is staffs opi~fion that with the application of the attached conditions which incorporate the Project EIR mitigations, all necessary findings for approval can be made. While residential expansion within the vicinity of an airport is a land use planning concern, the Project would be in conformance with all applicable policies of the Airport Plan. The loss of a
larger industrial site is a concern, but will be offset by the pending creation ofthe Stillwater Business Park. When completed, the Shastina Ranch park and trail will assist the City in achieving the General Plan goal of 10 acres of improved park per 1,000 population. When the Planning Commission recommended the project to the Council, it unanimously praised the Shastina Ranch representatives and staff for working together to ensure that this area reflects the best of Redding--itscharacter, its quality, and its vision for the future. Staffrecommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions for approval of General Plan Amendment Application GPA-4-03, Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-7-03, and Planned Development Plan PD-5-04; and accept theattached ordinances for approval of Rezoning Application RZ-8-03and the Shastina Ranch Development Agreement
for first reading
by title only.ATTA
CHMENTS A. Issues Discussion
B. Main Development Agreement
Points C. Resolution approving GPA-4-
03 D. Ordinance approvingRZ8- 03E. Resolution approvingS7- 03 and PD-5-04 F. Ordinance approving Development Agreement G.
Tentative map conditions of approval H.
Policy 1703, Eminent Domain,
findings. I. Potential traffic
benefit district map
J. Traffic analysis
120 lots/Airport Road
K. Existing General Plan
L. Proposed General Plan
M. Existing zoningN.
Proposed zoningO. Existing
Airport CLUP P. Proposed Airport CLUP Q. Tentative map (4)R. Planned Development Plan S. EIR-1- 03 (previously forwarded)* A copy of Final Environmental Impact Report EIR- 1-03 for the Shastina Ranch Project was previously provided tothe Council for its meeting on April 5, 2005,at which timethe
Council certified
the EIR. Ifa Council Member would like
another copyof theEIR, please
contact the City Clerk.DD:
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 070505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) ITEM NO. 6 - 2 MEETING
DATE 4-5-
05 APPROVED
BY Michael
Warren
DATE:
CODE:
FROM:
SUBJECT: CITY OF
REDDING REPORT TO CITY
COUNCIL March 30,
2005 L-OlO-O75/S-lOlO57/
GlO/
O30-
L-O
O
lO230/L-010-211-012/
S-101- 057 Development Services Department--
Planning Public Hearing reAdoption
of Resolution Certifying EIR1-03, Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project for Tentative Subdivision Map
ApplicationS-7-
03;
General Plan Amendment Application GPA-4-03; Rezoning Application RZ-8-03;Planned Development Application PD-5-04, and Development Agreement, by Shastina Ranch Development Company Inc.
RECOMMENDATION On February 8, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Shastina Ranch Subdivision project Project) and recommended that the City Council determine that thenecessary findings are in evidence andthat the Council certify Environmental Impact Report EIR1-03, evaluating the applications constituting the Shastina Ranch Subdivision project
and the associated Development Agreement between theCity and the Project applicant. This action requires adoption of the attached resolution and findings for certification of EIR-1-03.B/I CKGR 0 UND The public hearing for this item was continued from the March 15 Council meeting. Please refer to the March 15 City Council staff report fortheproject description, maps, and afull discussion of issues. The action to be considered by the Council at this meeting iscertification of the Final EIR.The entire scope of the project application is being presented inconjunction with the Final EIR, so thatthe Council hasacomprehensive view of the project. Approval of the project applications cannot occur until after the Shasta County Airports Land Use Commission ( ALUC)
review. ALUC will not review the project until the environmental document has been certified. After ALUC action is complete, staff will return tothe Council forfinal action onthe related approvals.
ISSUES Consideration
of
this item wascontinued from the March 15 meeting attherequest of the applicant. Since itwas an advertised hearing, the public hearing was opened, although no publiccomments were offered.TRAFFIC The Council requested development of alternative mitigation to Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 2 March 30, 2005
means ofthe project paying for its fair share ofthe necessary improvements to the intersections. The EIR and March 15 staff report acknowledge that this mitigation would require reprioritizing use of TIF funds in the City's Capital Improvement Program ( CIP) or possible amendment of the fee structure itself. The Council expressed a concern for approving an individual project that would require amending the TIF or CIP without taking a comprehensive look at the program as a whole.
The attached addendum to the Final EIR presents a background discussion leading to modification of Mitigation Measure MM 4.1, 11.addressing the Chum Creek Road/Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersections. The objective oftherefined mitigation isto ensure thatafunding mechanism will bein place that will satisfy the fair-share or "proportionality" standard required of a project mitigation or condition of approval and provide some suretyof the timely construction ofthe intersection improvements. The
proposed modification states: Prior to filing of a final map for residential development, or issuance of entitlement or building permit for development ofthe industrial land, the applicant, owner or successor ininterest, shall participate with the City of Redding ina funding mechanism to ensure the construction of improvements at the Chum Creek Road/ Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersections as necessary to maintain acceptable level-of-service operations. The applicant, owner, or successor in interest shall participate inthis funding mechanismat a
level equivalent to the project'spro
rata share of the improvements. Alternatively, the applicant, owner, or successor in interest shall pay at the time ofissuance ofabuilding permit aproject-specific facility fee establishedby the City Council equal to the project'
spro ratashare ofthe intersection improvements. This modified mitigation measure ensures that the project will contribute its fair share to finance the intersection improvements. The funding mechanism will take the form of an assessment district, benefit district, reimbursement agreement, or some combination thereof. In essence, whatwillbe created isa "localized" traffic impact mitigation program. This
mitigation is appropriate inview of the following: The refined mitigation addresses the fair- share consideration of the mitigation standard. The project as mitigated represents 17 percent of the traffic at theintersection. The potential deficiency of the intersection is substantially caused by existing citywide traffic. The Public FacilitiesPlan, contained in the Final EIR as Appendix 4.2, provides astarting point for establishing an area of benefit, which will spread the cost over
a larger area that will benefit from the improvement. The funding mechanism must be in place before creation of any lots, ensuring that the intersection improvements will be constructed. Once the funding mechanism is established, alimited amount of development can beallowed to occur prior to the actual intersection improvements, as longas the service levels at theintersections areacceptable to the Council and theimprovements are programmed into atimetable. It is anticipated that some level of project development with sole access from Airport Road would have little impact on the intersections. Staff will address this potential in the tentative map conditions when presented Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 3 . March 30, 2005
The direction of the mitigation is consistent with General Plan policy in regard to financing necessary citywide traffic improvements, both in terms of timing and fair-share allocation. General Plan policy acknowledges that temporary reductions in the desired level-of-service goals will occur while financing is developed toconstruct traffic improvements ofarea or regional benefit. Itis generally understood thatwith afeebased program, some improvements will lag behind development, since fees aretypically collected from development atthe time of issuance of building permits. During this lag time, the levels of service may decrease until enough funds are accumulated to do the improvement. The referenced General Plan policies are provided in the
attached Final EIR addendum. In conjunction with the ofrefinement MM 4.11.1, Condition 38 of the draft project conditions, included with the March 15 staff report, is also proposed to be modified as follows: 38. a. The developer shall pay the Citywide Transportation Development Impact Fee inaccordance with Chapter 16.20of the Redding Municipal Code. Prior to filing ofafinal map for residential development, or issuance of entitlement or building permit for development of theindustrial land, the applicant, owner or successor in interest, shall participate withthe City ofRedding in afunding mechanism to ensure the construction of improvements atthe Chum Creek Road/ Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersections as necessary to maintain acceptable level-of-service operations. The applicant, owner, or successor in interest shall participate in this fundingxnechanism at a level equivalent to the project's pro rata share ofthe improvements. Altematively, the applicant, owner, or successor ininterest shall pay atthe time ofissuance ofabuilding permitaproject-specific facility feeestablished by the City Council equal to the
project' s pro rata share of the intersection improvements. As noted above, this condition maybe further refined toestablish more specific development/ improvement thresholds when the tentative map is brought to the Council for approval.At the March 15 meeting, the Council also expressed concern about potential project impacts onthe Redding Municipal Airport and Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (
ACID) facilities in the vicinity of the project. In summary: REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT The project hasbeen evaluated inthe context of the State- mandated Redding Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). The main purpose of the CLUP is toanticipate expansion and useofthe Redding Airport and provide land useand safety policies forthe protection of residents andproperties inthe area surrounding the airport, while also protecting the long-term operational viability of the airport. These policies were established based on projected increases inflight operations and expansion of airport facilities. The levelof2004 flight operation was approximately 45 percent of total flights anticipated by the CLUP. The Final EIR andstaffs project analysis conclude that the project conforms toall applicable policies ofthe CLUP. The basis for this determination is provided at length in the EIR and in the March 15 Council staff report. The State Division of Aeronautics has reviewed the project and has not expressed any objection. Final approval ofthe
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 4 March 30, 2005
ACID FACILITIES A small portion of the Project (23.5 acres) is within the watershed of Chum Creek. Runoff from the Project site toward Chum Creek is intercepted by an ACID canal built along the west Project boundary in the early 1900s. The General Manager of the ACID has stated that drainage to this canal from development north of Rancho Road has damaged the canal structure and that ACID is opposed to any further development that will increase runoff to the canal. The EIR mitigations and subdivision map conditions preclude development of the 23.5 acres of Shastina Ranch within the Chum Creek watershed until an appropriate method of conveying water is approved by the City Engineer in consultation with the ACID. The EIR identifies two potential solutions. This restriction will affect 40 of the westemmost lots shown on the subdivision map.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR1-03 The Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act. The Final EIR was presented to the City Council, and the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final E1R.3. The Final EIR reflectsthe City's
independent judgment
and analysis. These findings are incorporated into the attached resolution for certification of the EIR,
Attachment "A."ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE AL
TERNA TIVES At the conclusion ofthepublic hearing, the City Council has the following altematives: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT EIR-1-03 1. Certify EIR-1-03 for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project by adoption ofthe attached
resolution ( Attachment "A"). ( Planning Commission Recommendation)2. Determine that additional inibrmation or revision is necessary tocomplete the
Final EIR. SitASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT Refer the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project to the Shasta County Airports Land Use Commission (ALUC) foradetermination of compatibility with the Redding Mtmicipal Airports Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). (Planning Commission Recommendation) Do not refer the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project to the Shasta County Airports Land Use Commission (ALUC) foradetermination of compatibility with the Redding Municipal Airports Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). Require modifications tothe tentative map, planned development plan, orother element of the Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) Report to City Council 5 March 30, 2005
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of staff that the findings for certification of the Shastina Ranch Environmental Impact Report EIR-1-03, are in evidence. It is further the opinion of staff that the project demonstrates conformance withthe City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as outlined inthis staff report and attachments. While residential expansion within the vicinity of an airport is aland use planning concern, the project would bein conformance withall applicable policies of the Airport Plan and should be forwarded to ALUC
for review. It isthe recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission that at the close of the public hearing, the City Council certify EIR-1-03 by adoption of the attached resolution. It is further recommended that the Council direct staff to prepare the necessary resolution and ordinances to effectuate approval of all elements ofthe Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project and Development Agreement after the heating by the Shasta County Airports LandUse Commission.4T
TA CHME NTS
A. Resolution certifying EIR-1-03 B.
Addendum to Shastina Ranch Final EIR C. March 15,
2005, Council
staffreport by reference
DD: jh STAF'~S703- GPA403- RZ803-PDS04-
ShastinaPD- DD-CC 1 .wpd c:
Jeb Allen, Shastina Ranch Development
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
CERTIFYING THE COMPLETENESS AND ADEQUACY
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR1-03 FOR THE SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Redding, as lead agency forthe Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project Project), has conducted thefollowing environmental review forthe proposed Project:1. ANotice of Preparation ofaDraft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was circulated for review and comment on March 23,
2004; and 2.' A Notice of Completion ofaDEIR was circulated for review and comment on August 26,
2004; and oApublic heating was conductedby the Planning Commission on the DEIR on September 28,2004. Notice ofthat hearing included aletter notice toallproperty owners between 600and 2,200 feet from theproject boundary and publication in the Record Searchlight; and After closure of the public comment period, all comments received were summarized and addressed in writing. Responses specific to local and State agencies were mailed directly tothose agencies on January 17,
2005; and 5. Written comments on the DEIR by State and local agencies and individuals and responses tocomments were included in theFinal Environmental Impact Report ( FEIR); and oApublic hearing was conducted bythe Planning Commission on the FE1R on February 8,2005. Notice ofthat hearing included a letter toall public agencies and persons that submitted comments on the DEIR and toallproperty owners between 600and 2,200feet fi:om the project boundary and publication in the Record
Searchlight; and The Planning Commission, atthe conclusion ofits February 8, 2005, heating, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2005- 01, recommending that the City Council certify FEIR-1-03and adopt
the Mitigation Monitoring Program; and oApublic hearing was conducted bythe City Council on FEIR- 1- 03 on March 15, 2005. Notice of that hearing included aletter to allpublic agencies and persons that submitted comments ontheDEIR and to allproperty owners between 600 and 2,200 feetfrom the project boundary and
publication in the Record Searchlight; and o Before final action can be taken by the City Council on the Project, the Project must be submitted to the Shasta County Airport Land Use Commission foradetermination of consistencyand/oranamendment to the Redding
Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and 10.The Shasta County Airport Land Use Commission may require a
certified environmental
document
in
order Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council ofthe City of Redding, based upon the entire record of the environmental review for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project, makes the following findings:
1. The FEIR has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and
2. The FEIR was presented to the City Council and the City Council has reviewed and considered the in'formation contained in the FEIR; and
3. The FEIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding, based upon substantial evidence in the administrative record and FEIR-1-03, hereby certifies the attached FEIR-1-03 ascomplete and incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe City Councilofthe City ofRedding ata regular meeting on this day of
by
the
following
vote:
AYES:NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Attest:
JOHN R.
MATHENA,
Mayor Form Approved: -'CONNIE STROHMAYER, City Clerk RICHARD A.
DUVERNAY, City Attorney Revised:
March
14, 15- 2005 3-05 KESO\CC~
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park)
ADDENDUM TO
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR
SHASTINA RANCH
SCH No. 2004032126
Prepared for:
CITY OF REDDING
Development Services Department
P. O. Box 49607'1
Reddin9, CA 96049
Prepared by:
PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS
508 Chestnut Street, Suite A
Mt. Shasta, CA 9606-]
Tel: 530.926-
4059 Fax: 530.
926-42-/9
MARCH
29, Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park)
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADDENDUM
BACKGROUND
At the Council Meeting of March 15, 2005, the City Council requested additional information on alternative mitigation for improvements needed to address existing and future deficiencies at the intersections of Rancho Road/ Churn Creek Road/
Victor Avenue.
IMPACT THRESHOLDS The Shastina Ranch project environmental document evaluates the intersections affected by the project and establishes a threshold for environmental significance based onthe City's General Plan Level of Service "C." Projects that result in impacts that reduce the level of service below 'C" must mitigate their impacts. Unfortunately, there are some intersections in the City that already operate below this level of service. For these intersections, it was necessary to establish adifferent threshold of significance to determine when improvements tothe intersection( s)should
be required. On 4.pages 11.124.and 11. 13 of the Draft EIR, athreshold discussion establishes a 25 percent impact level above which physical improvements must be installed. Below the 25 percent level, payment ofthe City's Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) was tobe considered acceptable. The use ofthe City's Traffic Impact Fee program was considered acceptable mitigation because it reflects
a
aregional responsibility for some transportation improvements and establishes funding mechanism for their installation. Payment of the TIF also ensures that one project does not have to bear the burden of large regionally
serving improvements. The proposed project has both a residential and an industrial component.
The residential component represents 446 single- family homes, the layout of which is shown on the tentative map. The industrial component is a remnant of the existingzoning and C-,eneral Plan designation, and no development is currently planned. Traffic assigned to the industrial component was based only on the possible land coverage as estimated from an average of trips per acre found in the Institute of Traffic Engineers ( ITE) manual. In essence, the EIR speculates on the potentialfor future industrial development in the absence of any proposal. Full buildout of the proposed project results in a calculated impact of approximately 27 percent at the Rancho Road/ Churn Creek Road/ Victor Avenue intersections. As noted above, this exceeds the threshold and would require improvements as stated in the DEIR. CEQA also provides for alternatives to a project that would reduce impacts. Since the-industrial component of the project was speculative and the associated traffic a mathematical estimate based on this speculation, the City proposed and the applicant agreed todelay the development ofthe industrial area until a funding solution was in place to install irnprovements at intersections. ( the See Mitigation Measure 4.11. 11 This mitigation measure effectively reduces to 17 percent the impact of project traffic at these intersections. Reducing the size or scope ofaproject to reduce the resulting environmental impact is an appropriate and
often- used method
during the
CEQA process.City
of Redding March 2005 ShastJna
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park)
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ,ADDENDUM
The Draft EIR concluded that since the industrial component of the project ' triggered the threshold for requiring that the project construct physical improvements to the intersection, the funding mechanism and design of the improvements could wait until an industrial use was proposed. Further, having the residential uses paying the Traffic Impact Fee would ensure that this portion of the development would also pay its proportionate share of the cost of intersection improvements. The EIR shows that the level of service at the intersections would continue to decline, while funds were collected to result in physical improvements.
GENERAL PLAN POLICY
The General Plan has a policy acknowledges that temporary reductions in the sought- after level of service will occur while financing is developed to fund, design, and install traffic improvements of area orregionwide benefit. It is generally understood that with a fee-based infrastructure program, some improvements will lag behind others, since fees are typically collected from development at building- permit issuance. During this " lag time," the level of service may decrease. This is recognized in the City' s General Plan by
the following
General Plan Policies: T1B - Require development projects to construct both on- and offsite improvements as necessary to mitigate the effects of increased traffic generated by the project and maintain peak-hour LOS standards established by Policy T1A. The traffic analysis used to establish mitigating measures shall bebased on the City' s Traffic Model or other City- approved method. Improvements may be deferred by the City upon approval of a Deferred Improvement Plan which identifies improvements needed, costs, funding sources, and other pertinent data required by the City. [ emphasis added] T3E - Pursue financing ina timely manner for all components of the transportation system toachieve and maintain
adopted level- of-service standards. T3F - Assess fees on new development sufficient to cover the fair shareportion ofthat development' s impacts on thelocal and regional transportation system. Exceptions may be when new development generatessignificant public benefits (e.g., Iow- income housing, primary- wage- earner employment), and alternative sources offunding for the improvements
can be
obtained to offset foregone revenues. FUNDING MEASURES At the Council Meeting of March 15, 2005, the City Council raised concerns regarding using the TIF program toadd these improvements without a comprehensive review of the entire program. As an alternative, there are other tools which can be used to provide funding for the
intersection improvements. Generally, they include the following: Assessment District. The creation of an assessment district would establish an area of benefit that directly affects the intersection( s) and requires all owners of undeveloped property within the area to participate in the funding of the improvements. Participation can be in the form of assessments placed on the land and paid over time or, alternately, through construction ofthe improvement and reimbursement of the improvement cost over time as other properties in the area develop. Assessment District financing can fund improvements " up front" ifthe property
values are adequate
tosupport
thedebt.City
ofRedding March 2005 Shastina
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park)
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADDENDUM
II. Benefit Fee Assessment. This approach is similar to the Assessment District, except that it typically relies on fees only to reimburse either the City or a developer for the improvements installed. The improvements are constructed at the time adequate fees have been collected to fund them.
Since the Council prefers not to add these intersection improvements to the TIF, but wants to ensure that all projects affecting this intersection pay their proportionate share of improvement costs, staff is recommending that Mitigation Measure 4.111. in the Final EIR be modified as set forth on the attached additional page to the FEIR Errata. The focus of these refinements is to ensure that a formal funding mechanism is in place prior to issuance of final development entitlements.
CEQA AUTHORITY FOR MODIFICATIONS
These modifications to a proposed mitigation measure are considered a refinement of the existing mitigation measures to more clearly state the intent of the City to ensure adequate funding and timing for improvements at the Rancho Road/ Churn Creek Road/ Victor Avenue intersections. Refinements to mitigation measures are an integral part of the environmental process and essential toensuring that. the EIR reflects the intent of the lead agency.
Since the Council is only refining the approach to impacts already identified in the EIR, no recirculation of the EIR is necessary or warranted. ( 15088. Section 5[4] of the CEQA Guidelines). City
of Redding
March 2005 Shastina
Ranch Subdivision Final Environmental Impact
Report,
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park)
ERRATA, ADDENDUM
4.11 TRANSPORTATION
made: MM11. 4
1:industr! a! ~,-,,, 4 ~, ......... ~,--,-,,~. ............ ~,, ;,~+ .... + ~,-,. ..... ~, ,.,~ hCity to 4,~*~,,.~ h~ ,-, pp,,-,p,i,-,~, ch .... ~ +~' .... ~ '" signals ,-,,, 4~,-,~,., f +'"'~ fi'" 4 ,,,~ g the ,-,,-,, th .... , h ....... ~,
D,-,,~,- h,-, ~,-,,-, 4/r"',~
h ....
Read/ Victor ~ ....... anintersect! to accommodate eft separate ! turn! aries sharedand through r!ght ane. Once the amount and t!m!ng of the fee !sdeterm!
ned shd! be pa!d ter-the m, f,-,, f...... ! mprevements. Prior to filin. q ofa final map for residential development, or issuance of entitlement orbuildin. q permit for development of the industrial land, the applicant, owner or successorin interest, shall participate with the City of Reddin.qin a fundin.cl mechanism to ensure
the construction of improvements atthe Churn Creek Road/Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersections as necessary to maintain acceptable level- of-service operations. The applicant, owner, or successor in interest shall participate in this fundin. q mechanism at a level equivalent to the project's pro rata share of the improvements. Alternatively, theapplicant, owner, or successor in interest shall pay at the time of issuance of a bu
Idin. q permit a project- specific facility fee established bythe City Council equal to the proiect' s pro rata share of the intersection improvements.Timing/ Implementation: Prior to filing of afinal
map for residential development or issuance of entitlement for development of the industrial land. Enforcement/ Monitoring:
City of Redding Development Services
Department. Shastfna Ranch Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Report,
Cityof
Addendum 4
Redding March 2005
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) ENG INEERS.PLANN ERS
MEMORANDUM
To: PMC Date:
Attn: Mark Teague Project:
From: Andrew Lee Job No.:
Re: FEIR LOS and Mitigation Changes File No.:
CC: Paul Miller
March 15, 2005
Shastina Ranch GPA Traffic Impact
Study
25-
5130-06
C723MEM012. DOC This memorandum addresses the change in Level- of-Service (LOS) for the intersections within the Shastina Ranch Traffic Impact Study (TIS) study area resulting from the removal of project- associated industrial trips segment of Churn Creek Road east of the I-5interchange. The Shastina Ranch project contains both residential and light industrial land uses. The elimination ofindustrial trips attributed to the Shastina Ranch project results in a decrease of 2,632 daily, 343 AM peak, and 360 PM peak hour trips, based on the trip generation estimates for the proposedproject zoning contained in Table 4.11-7 of the EIR. The absence of light industrial trips corresponds to a37%, 50%, and 44% reduction in project trip volumes for the daily, AM peak, and PM peak hour basis. The following tables show the resulting intersection and roadway' segment
LOS with
andwithout
theindustrial development:TABLE1INTERSECTION LEVELS-OF-SERVICE:EXISTING PLUS APPROVED PROJECT PLUS PROJECT~ WITH
INDUS' FRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Control . Warrant
Warrant Intersection ~ Type Delay LOS Met? Delay: LOS Met?6 Bonnyview Road / I- 5 SB
Ramps Signal 27.6 C 31.2 C - 7Bonnyview Road / I-5 NB Ramps Signal 32.8C 30.7C - 9 ChurnCreek Road / Victor AvenueTWSC 96. 5 F Yes 293.2 F Yes 10 Churn CreekRoad / Rancho Road TWSC81. 1 F Yes 96.6 17 Yes 11 Rancho Road / Alta Mesa Drive TWSC 27.5 D No D
31. No
9 TABLE2INTERSECTIONLEVELS- OF-SERVICE:EXISTING
PROJECT PLUS
PLUS
PROJECT,
APPROVE. D
WITHOUT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AM Peak Hour
PM Peal( Hour Control , Warrant Warrant Intersection Type LOS Met? LOS Met? Delay Delay 6 Bonnyview Road / I- 5 SBRamps Signal
28. 0
C31. 2 C 7 Bonnyview Road / I- 5 NBRamps Signal
33. 6C27.8 C 9 Churn Creek Road / Victor Avenue TWSC51. 0 F Yes 120.0F Yes 10 Churn Creek Road / Rancho Road TWSC 29.2 D Yes
39. 9EYes 11 Rancho Road / Alta MesaDrive TWSC 19. 5C No 21. 4CNo 943 Reserve Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95678 ~ (916) 782- Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park) March 15, 2005
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the reduction in delay at Intersections 9 and 10 are such that mitigation is still required.
According to the EIR, "If an intersection or roadway facility is significantly impacted by the proposed project for short-term conditions, and theproject's
pro-rata share is equal to or above twenty
five (25)percent, then the project will be required to construct the necessary improvements. If an intersection orroadway facility issignificantly impacted bythe proposed project (as defined in No. 1above) for existing plus approved project conditions, andthe project' s pro- rata share is belowtwenty five ( 25)percent, then the project will be required topay their pro- rata share ofthe cost of constructing these improvements. Full mitigation forthe project is assumed bypayment ofthe project' s Traffic Impact Fee and the City will ensure that impacts are reduced toaless than significant level through ongoing implementation of the
Capital Improvement Plan ( CIP). " The volumes at Intersections 9and 10, with project industrial development, aresuch that the project' spro- rata share is1% ( 27.464 / (2,971-1,257)). Withoutindustrial development, the pro. ject's pro- rata share 17. is 2% ( 259 / (2,766-1,257)). Therefore, because the project' s impact on the deficient intersections is less than 25%, the project should be required to pay their pro-rata share ofthe cost of constructing these improvements rather than berequired
toconstruct
the necessary improvements.TABLE 3ROADWAY LEVELSOF-SERVICE: EXISTING PLUS APPROVED/ PENDING PROJECTS PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Average Daily Level
of Roadway SegmentCapacity Configuration Traffic (ADT) Service Volumes ( LOS) .
Rancho Road - Churn Creek Road to
Shasta View DriveExisting + Approved
Projects +
Project ( w\ industrial Two-LaneArterial 11,
170 C development)Existing + Approved
Projects +
Project (w\o
industrial Two-Lane Arterial9,590
B development)
Churn Creek Road - I-5/Churn
Creek Road Interchange to Rancho Road
Existing + Approved Projects + Project (w\ industrial TwoLane Arterial 16,110 D development)
Existing + Approved Projects + Project ( w\oindustrial Two-Lane Arterial 14,663 C/D development) Table 3 shows that the segment of Rancho Road between Chum Creek Road and Shasta View Drive operates within acceptable LOS limits on adaily for all development scenarios. The segment of Churn Creek Road isprojected to operate at the cusp
of LOS "C/D" (threshold for LOS "C" is14,5000 ADT) without Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 040505 (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5345 Shastina Ranch Park)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update regarding award of emergency construction contract for replacement of Storm Drain System on Eastside Road, and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.
Fiscal Impact
Project costs will be funded by the Storm Drain Utility Division. The updated estimated total project cost of the repairs is less than $300,000.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
N&T Digmore, Inc., of Redding, California, began work to remove and replace the damaged storm drain and reconstruct the fill slope on March 27, 2023, and is expected to complete the field work by April 7, 2023. Staff anticipates presenting the Project Acceptance to the Council at the May 2, 2023, Council meeting.
The project requires replacement of the failed storm drain pipe and backfilling the roadway slope to ensure the integrity of the roadway. Staff estimates the work to total less than $300,000 including construction contract work, construction management, and inspection.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Update Regarding Emergency Construction Contract Awarded for Repair of Storm Drain System on Eastside Road.
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 328
Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2023
Re: 4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd Page 2 Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On March 21, 2023, the Council determined that the Eastside Road Emergency Storm Drain Repair Project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding” Attachments
Previous Staff Report 032123
Packet Pg. 329
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Eastside Road Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Project (Project) (Job Order No. 2992-21):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote, ratifying the City cy construction contract for emergency replacement of a storm drain system and roadway slope on Eastside Road;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $200,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(4) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).
Fiscal Impact
The estimated total Project cost is $300,000. These costs include construction and staff time for construction management and inspections. The Storm Drain Utility Division (Storm Drain Utility) has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget for this project.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead prepare an award to the low bidder in accordance with State and local contracting procedures. This will result in the closure of Eastside Road for an extended period impacting area businesses and residents. There will be an increased risk of roadway failure and potential rupture of the high-pressure gas main posing a significant threat to businesses, property, State Route (Highway) 273, and railroad operations.
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 2(a)--Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Facility on Eastside Road Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) Report to Redding City Council March 20, 2023
Re: 2(a)Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Facility on Eastside Road Page 2 Or, the Council could also provide alterative direction to staff Background/Analysis
The Storm Drain Utility maintains storm drain facilities throughout the City of Redding (City) including inlets, outfalls, pipes, and channels. Located on Eastside Road just south of Haven Humane Society and 1.4 miles north of Latona Road is a 48-inch corrugated metal storm drain pipe. The pipe conveys water from Happy Valley Road, Highway 273, and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks, under Eastside Road and onto City-owned property to the east. The Storm Drain Utility made an expedient repair to the system in 2020 when the outlet to the creek had failed. Today, the connection to the outlet and the remainder of the piping underneath the roadway is failing causing soil erosion to the adjacent road slopes (both sides) and exposing a Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) two-inch gas line. There is also a PG&E 10-inch, high-pressure transmission gas main in the roadway above the failing storm drain pipe. Eastside Road is now temporarily closed due to the concerns of entire roadway failure and damage to the high-pressure gas main.
With forecasts of continued wet weather, and the roadway slope gradually deteriorating, the Storm Drain Utility and Engineering Divisions agreed that time is of the essence to avert the possible threat of a complete roadway failure, damage to the gas lines, and material being washed downstream, and potential flooding of the adjacent roadways. Simply closing the road and re-routing traffic will not mitigate the exigency because the storm water may continue to erode the road bank and undermine the gas line. The expedient need for repairs does not allow time for traditional engineering design and formal competitive bidding.
Staff proposes an emergency contract to replace the failed storm drain pipe and repair the overlying roadway and its adjacent support slope. Staff estimates the work to total less than $300,000 including construction contract work, construction management and inspection. It is further estimated that the work will be complete within two weeks.
It is noted that the Public Contract Code (Section 20168) provides that the legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the PCC
a public agency, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice the City Manager to authorize necessary actions and for the Council to subsequently review and ratify such actions within seven days or at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council. to ensure no further damage to persons, public health or property occurs.
The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project qualifies as categorically exempt from environmental Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) Report to Redding City Council March 20, 2023
Re: 2(a)Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Facility on Eastside Road Page 3 review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15301 and Section 15302. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. Class 2 exemptions consist of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. The existing storm drain pipe will be replaced to prevent additional erosion and potential roadway failure. The pipe will be located on the same site, will have substantially the same purpose and capacity, and the project will result in no expansion of use. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
Public Safety
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code
4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and
WHEREAS, on or about March 17, 2023, staff was made aware that the storm water conveyance system under Eastside Road failed a n d i s causing significant erosion and undermining of the roadway; and
WHEREAS, the roadway carries significant truck traffic, is adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, and contains two natural gas pipelines within the roadway section; and WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids will delay the repairs needed to prevent further damage to the roadway, rupture of the natural gas pipelines, flooding of the adjacent roadways, and restore unimpeded traffic flow along Eastside Road; and WHEREAS, failure of the storm water conveyance system and/or the natural gas pipelines would threaten the safety and property of persons nearby; and WHEREAS, isolation of the impacted area so that the delay due to competitive bidding could be accommodated would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property;
1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.
2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the storm water conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the roadway and adjacent natural gas lines or flooding of the adjacent roadways.
3. The emergency conditions set forth herein will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids and immediate action is necessary to respond to the emergency.
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd)
4. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore
of an emergency construction contract to repair the storm drain system and roadway along Eastside Road.
5. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of March, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd)
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: City of Redding 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Public Works Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Shasta County Clerk
County of Shasta
P.O. Box 990880, 1643 Market Street
Redding, CA 96099-0880
Project Title: Eastside Road Storm Drain Emergency Repair Project 2023 Project Location – Specific: Eastside Road just south of Haven Humane Society and 1.4 miles north of Latona Road Project Location – City: Redding Project Location – County: Shasta Description of Project: The City of Redding Public Works Department will conduct an emergency storm drain repair project on Eastside Road. Due to heavy rain, the connection to the outlet and the remainder of the piping underneath the roadway is failing causing soil erosion to the adjacent road slopes. The project includes replacing approximately 80-feet of deteriorated 48-inch corrugated metal pipe, repairing the eroded roadway embankments, paving, and striping. The open trench will either be restored to original condition or covered with steel plates at the end of each day. The project is located within the City right of way and the public will be notified.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Redding Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Ryan Bailey, Assistant Public Works Director Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial [Section 21080(b)(1); 15268]
Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)]
Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)]
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Common Sense Exemption (This project does not fall within an exempt class, but it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment (14 CCR 15061[b][3]).
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Section 15301. Existing Facilities and Section 15302.
Replacement or Reconstruction
No exceptions apply that would bar the use of a categorical exemption (PRD 21084 and 14 CCR 15300.2).
Reasons why project is exempt: Class 1 exemptions include the operation and repair of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. The existing storm drain pipe will be replaced to prevent additional erosion and potential roadway failure. The pipe will be located on the same site, will have substantially the same purpose and capacity, and the project will result in no expansion of use. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Amber Kelley Telephone: 530.225.4046 If Filed by Applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the p
Signature:__________________________ Date:_________________________ Title: Environmental Compliance Manager
Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR:______________ Signed by Applicant
%QFIV/IPPI] 1EVGL (MKMXEPP]WMKRIHF]%QFIV/IPPI] (2
GR!%QFIV/IPPI]S!'MX]SJ6IHHMRKSY!4YFPMG;SVOW
)RKMRIIVMRKIQEMP!EOIPPI]$GMX]SJVIHHMRKSVKG!97
(EXI
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 032123 (4.11(c)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Summary Vacation of Chevy Court (A-2022-02128):
(1) Adopt Resolution summarily vacating Chevy Court and a Public Service Easement within the areas shown on Parcel Map No. 15-07 Phase 3A filed in Book 38 of Parcel Maps at Page 40, Shasta County Records (A-2022-02128) described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B;
(2) Find the action consistent with the General Plan; and (3) Find the action categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15035 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations.
Fiscal Impact
Adopting the resolution will have no fiscal impact to the City of Redding (City). All costs associated with the processing of this project are paid by the applicant. The portions of the vacated right-of-way will revert to the abutting parcels as fee owners.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the resolution and leave Chevy Court and the Public Service Easement in place.
Background/Analysis
The owner of the parcels adjacent to Chevy Court has requested the vacation of Chevy Court and the adjacent 5-foot-wide Public Service Easement (PSE). Chevy Court and the PSE were dedicated to the City by the recordation and filing of Parcel Map No. 15-07 Phase 3A (Parcel Map) on November 18, 2009, in Book 38 of Parcel Maps at Page 40, Shasta County Records. No MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court (A-2022-02128) Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 337
Report to Redding City Council March 26, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement Page 2 development has occurred nor any street improvements constructed on these parcels. Chevy Court and the PSE, as described in the attached Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B, have not been used by the public and contain no public facilities. The request was coordinated with various City departments and there is no foreseeable need for the roadway and utility easement.
Chevy Court may be determined to be excess and eligible for summary vacation per Streets and Highways Code 8334. The PSE may be determined to be excess and eligible for summary vacation per Streets and Highways Code 8333. These summary vacations are consistent with the General Plan as they will: reduce maintenance needs of public streets and facilities, not preclude uses consistent with current zoning, and encourage design consistent with the surroundings. The owner of the adjacent parcels will be required to record a covenant stating he will grant proper access prior to the conveyance of any parcels and prior to the recordation of the vacation resolution.
The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that the activity is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). The Class 5 exemption allows for minor alterations to land use limitations, as long as the average slope on site is less than 20 percent and would not result in any changes in land use or density. This action will not result in the creation of any new parcels, nor will it change land use density. The existing General Plan and Zoning land use designations would remain as they currently exist and the average slope does not exceed 20 percent. In addition, the project area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources. The action has no potential to have a significant impact on the environment.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
c: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Land Rights Services AT&T California
Charter Communications
Attachments
^Resolution
^Vicinity Map
^Exhibit A
^Exhibit B
^Notice of Exemption (unfiled)
Packet Pg. 338
Recording Requested by
City of Redding
Please Return to
City Clerk
P.O. Box 496701
Redding, CA 96049-6071
Documentary Transfer Tax: None
City of Redding EXEMPT
Rev. & Tax C.A. §11922
NO FEE-CITY BUSINESS
Gov. Code §6103
APN 077-220-017, 077-220-018, 077-220-019, 077-220-020, 077-220-021, 077-220-022, 077-220-023, 077-220-024, 077-220-025
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING SUMMARILY VACATING THE CITY’S INTEREST IN CHEVY COURT AND PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 15-07, PHASE 3A (ABANDONMENT APPLICATION A-2022-02128)
WHEREAS:
A. Chevy Court and the Public Service Easement being considered for summary vacation were acquired by dedication by Parcel Map No. 15-07, Phase 3A filed in Book 38 of Parcel Maps at
and made a part hereof by reference. The owner of the adjacent parcels has asked that the City vacate Chevy Court and the Public Service Easement.
B. The parcels created by Parcel Map No. 15-07, Phase 13A have not been developed and the physical street improvements within Chevy Court have not been constructed. Chevy Court is not required for street or highway purposes. The Public Service Easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated and there are no public facilities located within the Easement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The recitals set forth above are true, correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.
2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 8334(a), the City Council determines Chevy Court to be excess and is unnecessary for present or prospective public street use.
3. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 8333(c), the City Council determines the Public Service Easement to be excess.
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement)
4. The City Council approves the request to summarily vacate Chevy Court and the Public Service Easement as shown on Parcel Map No. 15-07, Phase 3A filed in Book 38 of Parcel Maps at Page 40, Shasta County Records, as described in Exhibit “A” and shown on the attached Exhibit “B.”
5. The vacation of Chevy Court and the Public Service Easement is consistent with the General Plan.
This action will: reduce maintenance needs of public streets and facilities; will not preclude uses consistent with current zoning; and encourages design compatible with its surroundings.
6. The vacation of Chevy Court and the Public Service Easement qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environment review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15305 – Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations. No changes in land use or density will occur and areas affected contain an average slope of less than 20%. There is no possibility that this action will have a significant impact on the environment.
7. The City Clerk is directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Vacation, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded in the Office of the Shasta County Assessor/Recorder.
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 4th day of April, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_____________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ _____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement) Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: ^Vicinity Map (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement) Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: ^Exhibit A (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement) Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: ^Exhibit B (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement) Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (unfiled) (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement) Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (unfiled) (4.11(d)--Summary Vacation of Chevy Court and Public Service Easement)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to execute a subcontract between University Enterprises, Inc. and the City of Redding for Professional Engineering Services related to the Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water Company’s consolidation into the City of Redding’s Water Utility.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact. University Enterprises, Inc. (UEI) will provide compensation to the City of Redding (City) Public Works Department in an amount not to exceed $43,719 to perform professional engineering services and prepare 90% plans and specifications for the necessary water infrastructure to consolidate the Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water Company into the City’s Water Utility.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize the City Manager to execute the Subcontract and provide alternative direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
The Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water Company (CRCMWC), Public Water System Identification (PWSID) No. CA4500012, was formed in the 1960s to provide water service to 28 residential parcels along Forest Hills Drive and Wimbledon Drive near the current Sun Oaks Tennis and Fitness Club. Due to the aging water system and lack of resources to operate a small water company, the CRCMWC has been in contact with the City to consolidate into the City’s water system.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc. and the City of Redding for Professional Engineering Services related to the Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water Company Consolidation Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 346
Report to Redding City Council March 28, 2023
Re: 4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR Page 2 The CRCMWC is located within the City limit and is surrounded by the City’s water service area. Many of the existing customers of the CRCMWC already have a City water main in the street in front of their homes. Only 1,200 LF of new water main is needed to connect to the City’s system.
UEI, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, was awarded a Proposition 1 Technical Assistance grant from the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to provide funding to assist small disadvantaged communities to improve drinking water and wastewater systems. In September 2021, the CRCMWC obtained a Technical Assistance Work Plan from UEI and SWRCB to prepare a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Construction Application for the preparation of the general, technical, environmental, and financial packages, as well as the plans and specifications documents necessary, per State guidelines, to connect CRCMWC to the City’s water system. PACE Engineering, also contracted with UEI, is preparing the general, technical, environmental, and financial packages for the construction application. Since the new water mains, services, and meters will be part of the City’s water system and should be constructed to City standards and requirements, the City will prepare the 90% Plans and Specifications documents which is the subject of the attached subcontract.
If the construction application is approved by the SWRCB, the City will apply for a DWSRF grant to finance the construction of the project, including City connection impact fees. There are no funds allocated to the construction of the project at the time of this staff report; in the event the grant is not awarded, the project will not proceed. Staff will return to the Council at a future date to request authorization to apply for the grant funds.
The subcontract has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The subcontract will allow the City to provide design and technical study information necessary to ensure environmental clearance as the project progresses.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
^Cascade Racquet Club MWC Water Main- Location Map
Subcontract - UEI and COR
Packet Pg. 347
CITY OF REDDING LOCATION MAP CASCADE RACQUET CLUB PUBLIC WORKS MWC WATER MAIN PROJECT DEPARTMENT LOCATION PROJECT Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: ^Cascade Racquet Club MWC Water Main- Location Map (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR) Subcontract #: 537811B
SUBCONTRACT BETWEEN
UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND
CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA
Parties
This subcontract (“Subcontract”), dated for convenience this ___ day of March, 2023, is entered into by and between University Enterprises, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation organized and operating as an auxiliary organization serving California State University, Sacramento in accordance with California Education Code sections 89900, et seq. and Title 5 of the California of Regulations sections 42400, et seq. (“UEI”) and the City of Redding, California (“Contractor”). UEI and Contractor are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
Recitals
WHEREAS, UEI was awarded a Proposition 1 Technical Assistance grant from the California State Water Resources Control Board (the “Funding Agency”) under Agreement No. D1612806 originally executed on or about September 1, 2016, and thereafter amended (the “Funding Agreement”) to provide funding to be used by UEI to assist small, disadvantaged communities to improve their drinking water and wastewater systems (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, UEI administers grants and contracts benefiting California State University, Sacramento, and is authorized pursuant to Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations, section 42500(a)(7) to enter into subcontracts relating to the performance of responsibilities under the Funding Agreement; and
WHEREAS, all work required of UEI under the Funding Agreement shall be performed and/or overseen by the Office of Water Programs at California State University, Sacramento (“OWP”), though UEI remains solely responsible under the above-referenced funding agreements to ensure the proper performance of UEI’s obligations thereunder; and WHEREAS, UEI and Contractor wish to enter into this Subcontract for Contractor to perform certain professional services hereunder pursuant to Project Work Plan #6601-A in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Subcontract;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and of the terms and conditions below, the Parties agree as follows:
Terms and Conditions
1. SERVICES.
In pursuit of the Project, Contractor will perform those professional services identified for Contractor to perform in, and generally described in, TA Work Plan 6571-B attached hereto 8 th
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, and which professional services are more specifically described in the following: Contractor’s proposal dated December 13, 2021, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Services”).
Contractor represents that: (i) it is qualified to undertake the Services, (ii) it possesses the means and resources required in order to perform the Services in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Subcontract, (iii) the Services will be performed in a manner consistent with that level of skill and care ordinarily exercised by other qualified professional consultants performing work of the type contemplated herein, and (iv) in the performance of the work and preparation of any report, findings, recommendations, or other work product developed by the Contractor pursuant hereto, Contractor will not violate the intellectual property rights of others.
2. TERM.
Subject to the provisions of section 15, the term of this Subcontract shall be from September 24, 2021, to November 30, 2023, except that UEI may unilaterally extend the expiration date (and final invoice date) of this Subcontract by providing written notice to Contractor of a new expiration date. Upon such notice, the new expiration date will be deemed to have been automatically incorporated herein as an amendment to this Subcontract.
3. FUNDING AGREEMENT.
This Subcontract is subject to, and Contractor shall comply with, all applicable terms and conditions of the Funding Agreement, which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. Without limiting the foregoing, Contractor agrees to be bound to UEI with respect to the obligations contained in Funding Agreement to the same degree and in the same manner that UEI is so bound to the Funding Agency under the Funding Agreement. In the case of a direct conflict between any of the terms and conditions contained in the Funding Agreement and any of the terms and conditions contained in this Subcontract, the latter shall govern.
4. COMPENSATION.
This is a cost reimbursement agreement. In exchange for Contractor performing the Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Subcontract, UEI’s total obligation to Contractor under this Subcontract shall not exceed the sum of Forty-Three Thousand Seven Hundred Nineteen Dollars ($43,719). Contractor shall perform the Services in accordance with, and subject to the line-item limitations contained in Exhibit B (the “Budget”). Contractor shall invoice UEI no more frequently than monthly for the proportion of those Services actually performed. At no time shall the cumulative amount of all invoices issued by Contractor reflect a proportion of the above-referenced not-to-exceed amount that exceeds the proportion of the Services properly completed. All such invoices shall (a) reference this Subcontract number, (b) include an invoice number and date of the request, (c) contain the period covered by the invoice, (d) be itemized based on line items specified in the Budget, (e) contain supporting or back-up documentation for all amounts shown on the request, including all staff time shown by number of hours worked and hourly rate, and identify the proportion of the Services covered by the invoice as well as the total proportion of all of the Services cumulatively invoiced to date, and (f) be signed by Contractor’s Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
authorized financial representative or designee. The above-referenced not-to-exceed amount of Forty-Three Thousand Seven Hundred Nineteen Dollars ($43,719) is inclusive of all costs and expenses, including but not limited to travel and transportation costs and expenses, materials, equipment, overhead, taxes, and profit. Accordingly, Contractor shall not be entitled to reimbursement for travel and transportation time, or costs and/or expenses in addition to this not to exceed amount stated in this section 4. No work or travel outside the State of California is permitted under this Subcontract without prior UEI written authorization.
Except as otherwise provided herein, Contractor’s final invoice must be delivered to UEI within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services but in no case later than December 29, 2023. Failure on the part of Contractor to comply with this deadline shall result in Contractor permanently waiving its right to any amounts included on such final invoice. The Parties agree that Services performed during the term of this Subcontract shall be performed under the provisions of this Subcontract and shall not entitle Contractor to any additional compensation. If, during the term of this Subcontract, UEI desires to retain Contractor to perform work or services determined by UEI to be new work or services not covered by this Subcontract, then a separate written agreement for new work or services must be executed by the Parties prior to performance of the new work or services.
Acceptance by Contractor of final payment under this Subcontract shall constitute a release of UEI from all claims and liability to the Contractor for payment hereunder, and for any additional compensation or payment relating to any and all things done or furnished in connection with this Subcontract. However, final payment shall in no way relieve Contractor of liability for its obligations, or for faulty, incomplete, or defective work, discovered after final payment.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
Contractor and any and all agents and/or employees of Contractor shall perform the Services as an independent contractor using its own tools and equipment, and not as an officer, employee, or agent of UEI. Contractor shall set its own hours and shall control the manner and means of performing the Services, though UEI retains the right to oversee that Contractor’s performance of the Services complies with the requirements of this Subcontract.
Contractor warrants and represents that neither it nor any of its employees or agents is an employee of the CSU system, or any of its auxiliary organizations. Payments to Contractor hereunder will be reported to state and federal tax authorities as required by law and UEI will not pay or withhold federal, state, or local income tax (except as may be required by applicable law) or other payroll taxes of any kind in connection with such payments.
Contractor is independently responsible for payment of all applicable taxes.
6. DISCLAIMER OF RIGHTS.
As an independent contractor, Contractor expressly disclaims each and all of the following and promises not to make a claim against or sue UEI for any such matters at any future date.
The matters so disclaimed and waived are:
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
a. Any claim that Contractor (or any of its employees or agents) is or may become a probationary employee or an employee of any nature whatsoever of UEI, except when affirmatively so employed under a subsequent written contract; b. Any claim or assertion of a right to participate in UEI employee health and welfare benefit programs under the terms of this Subcontract;
c. Any claim or assertion of a right to paid sick leave, paid vacation leave, or an entitlement to a leave of absence under the terms of this Subcontract; and d. Any claim or assertion that Contractor is or may be entitled to a statement of or a hearing on the issue of the reason for termination of this Subcontract.
7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Contractor, by execution of this Subcontract, warrants and covenants that no official or employee of UEI, nor any business entity in which an official of UEI has an interest, has been employed or retained or solicited or aided in the procurement of this Subcontract, nor will any such person be employed in the performance of this Subcontract without immediate divulgence of such fact to UEI and consent by UEI, which consent may be granted or withheld in UEI’s sole discretion.
8. SUBCONTRACTING; ASSIGNMENT.
Except as otherwise stated in this Subcontract, Contractor shall perform all services required on its part to be performed hereunder using only resources available within its own organization. No portion of the work shall be subcontracted nor right to payment assigned without the advance written approval of UEI, which may be granted or denied in UEI’s sole discretion.
Because this Subcontract is an agreement for the performance of professional services and because Contractor was chosen based on its expertise in performing such professional services, assignment of this Subcontract or attempted assignment of this Subcontract by Contractor without the advance written consent of UEI (which consent may be granted or withheld in UEI’s sole discretion) shall constitute a material breach of this Subcontract and entitle UEI to exercise any and all rights provided for by this Subcontract and/or by law for such material breach.
9. INDEMNIFICATION.
To the extent of Contractor’s fault, Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless UEI; OWP; the Funding Agency; the State of California; the Trustees of the California State University; California State University, Sacramento; and all of said entities’ officers, directors, agents and employees from and against any and all liabilities, losses, claims, suits, allegations, demands, damages, penalties, and/or costs, including without limitation litigation costs and attorneys’ fees, resulting from or arising out of the Contractor’s performance of this Subcontract. The provisions of this section 9 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Subcontract. In the case of any conflict between the provisions of this section 9 and indemnification obligations contained in the Funding Agreement, the provisions of this section 9 shall govern.
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
10. INSURANCE.
Contractor shall at its own cost and expense carry and maintain commercial general liability insurance protecting against bodily injury and property damage in a coverage amount of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence. Such insurance policy shall be written on an “occurrence” basis, and not on a “claims made” basis, and shall be endorsed to name the following as additional insureds: UEI; OWP; the Funding Agency; the State of California; the Trustees of the California State University; California State University, Sacramento; and all of said entities’ employees, agents, directors, officers, and affiliates. Additionally, Contractor shall at its own cost and expense carry and maintain professional liability insurance covering claims including acts, errors, and omissions, arising out of the rendering of, or failure to render, professional services related to this Subcontract.
Such professional liability insurance shall have policy limits of no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim. Such professional liability insurance must be maintained, and evidence of such insurance must be provided, for at least three (3) years after completion or cessation of the Services. This requirement shall survive any expiration or termination of this Subcontract. All insurance policies referenced in this paragraph shall be provided by insurance carriers that are reasonably acceptable to UEI. Upon execution of this Subcontract, and thereafter upon renewal of each of the above-referenced insurance policies, Contractor shall provide UEI certificates of insurance and applicable policy endorsements demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the provisions of this section 10. If Contractor is self-insured, upon execution of this Agreement, and thereafter upon any change in Contractor’s selfinsurance program or upon request of UEI, Contractor shall provide proof to UEI that Contractor’s self-insurance program provides coverage that meets or exceeds the types of insurance coverages and insurance coverage limits specified in this section 10.
11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS.
Contractor shall at its own cost and at all times during the term of this Subcontract comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws.
12. RECORDS; RIGHT TO AUDIT.
Contractor shall retain all financial records, including but not limited to documents, reports, books, and accounting reports that pertain to any work or transaction performed pursuant to this Subcontract for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Subcontract, unless a longer retention period is required in the Funding Agreement. As to Subcontractor’s books and records, UEI, Funding Agency, and any other governmental agencies mentioned in the Funding Agreement, shall have those audit rights specified in the Funding Agreement.
The provisions of this section 12 shall survive any termination or expiration of this Subcontract.
13. AMENDMENT.
Except as otherwise provided herein, this Subcontract may not be amended except in writing signed by both Parties. No amendment or change to any of the terms or conditions of this Subcontract shall be effective until executed by UEI’s Director of Sponsored Programs Administration. Any variance from any of the terms or conditions of this Subcontract by Contractor prior to the approval and execution of an amendment by UEI’s Director of Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
Sponsored Programs Administration shall be at Contractor’s own risk.
14. CONFLICTS.
In the case of conflicts between any of the terms and conditions contained in Exhibit B on the one hand, and any of the terms and conditions contained in this Subcontract (excluding Exhibit B) on the other hand, the latter shall govern.
15. TERMINATION.
This Subcontract may be terminated by UEI without cause and at no penalty, cost, or expense to UEI, upon thirty (30) days’ advance written notice to Contractor. If this Subcontract is terminated at any time during its term, Contractor shall, subject to the limitations of this Subcontract, be reimbursed for (i) all completed services rendered up to and including the day it received noticed of such termination, to the extent such services comply with the terms and conditions of this Subcontract, and (ii) all non-cancellable obligations in existence at the time that Contractor received notification of the termination of this Subcontract.
16. NOTIFICATION.
Any notice required or permitted hereunder shall be sent by a party hereto to the other via U.S. mail, postage prepaid and certified (with return receipt requested), by reliable overnight carrier, or by personal service, at the following addresses:
Contractor UEI
Josh Watkins, Water Utility Manager Monica Kauppinen, Director, Sponsored Prog.
City of Redding, Public Works Department University Enterprises, Inc.
P.O. Box 496071
Redding, CA 96049-6071
6000 J Street, MS 6111
Sacramento, CA 95819
If delivered via personal service, the notice shall be deemed effective upon such delivery. If delivered by reliable overnight carrier, such notice shall be deemed effective one (1) day after deposit with such carrier, properly addressed and postage prepaid. If delivered via certified mail, such notice shall be deemed effective as of the earlier of (i) three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. mail, properly addressed, postage prepaid, certified with return receipt requested, or (ii) the date of acceptance of delivery as evidenced by the date of the signature on the return receipt. Either party may change its address by giving written notice to the other pursuant to the provisions of this section 16.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Subcontract and all attachments hereto constitute the entire understanding between the Parties on the subject matter specified herein. There are no other understandings, agreements, representations, or warranties, express or implied, that are not specified in this Subcontract.
Contractor, by execution of this Subcontract, acknowledges that Contractor has read this Subcontract, understands the Subcontract, and agrees to be bound by its terms and conditions.
18. APPLICABLE LAW, JURISDICTION AND VENUE.
This Subcontract shall be construed pursuant to California law, excluding its choice of Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
law provisions. The Parties to this Subcontract agree that any dispute which may arise between them in connection with this Subcontract shall be adjudicated before a federal or state court located in Sacramento County, California, and they hereby irrevocably and exclusively submit to the personal jurisdiction of such federal and state courts located in Sacramento County, California with respect to any action or legal proceeding commenced by any party. The Parties irrevocably waive any objection they now or hereafter may have respecting the venue of any such action or proceeding brought in such a court or respecting the fact that such court is an inconvenient forum.
19. ATTORNEYS’ FEES.
If any legal action, arbitration, or other proceeding, is brought for the enforcement of this Subcontract, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, or default in connection with any of the provisions of this Subcontract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in that action or proceeding, including any appeal of such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.
20. AUTHORIZATION.
Each person executing this Subcontract represents that the execution of this Subcontract has been duly authorized by the party on whose behalf the person is signing and that such person is authorized to execute the Subcontract on behalf of such party.
21. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.
Each party agrees that this Subcontract and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Subcontract or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.
The Parties agree to the foregoing terms and conditions.
CONTRACTOR
CITY OF REDDING
UEI
UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES, INC.
By: ______________________________ By: ____________________________ Barry Tippin, City Manager Monica F. Kauppinen, Director Sponsored Programs Administration
Tax ID #: __94-6000401__________
Date: Date:
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA) WORK PLAN
UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES, INC. (UEI)
AND
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
SAFE AND AFFORDABLE FUNDING FOR EQUITY AND RESILIENCE (SAFER)
DRINKING WATER PROGRAM TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (PROJECT)
AGREEMENT NUMBER (NO.) D19-17008
AMENDED TA WORK PLAN NO. 6571-AB
TA START DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 2021
AMOUNT: $ 112,374
Whereas through the passage of various bond acts, including Proposition 1 in November 2014 and Senate Bill 200 in July 2019, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) is authorized to make available certain general obligation bond proceeds (GO Bond Proceeds) and Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Funds (SADW Funds) for projects meeting certain criteria; and Whereas the State Water Board has determined that this Project is eligible for certain GO Bond Proceeds and/or SADW Funds;
Therefore, the parties hereby amend the Agreement, originally executed on April 14, 2021, and incorporated herein, to add:
AMENDED TA WORK PLAN NO. 6571-AB (65 pages attached) ** ** Entire Exhibit added to replace TA work plan No. 6571-A (executed April 27, 2022)
All other terms and conditions shall remain the same.
RECIPIENT:
By:
Name:Monica F. Kauppinen
Title: Director, Sponsored Programs Administration
Date:
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD:
By:
Name: Joe Karkoski
Title: Deputy Director, Division of Financial Assistance Date: 1/19/23
EXHIBIT A
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR) Amended Work Plan No. 6571-AB Page 1 of 6 Rev. 03/24/21 Technical Assistance (TA) Work Plan TA Type: Drinking Water Wastewater Storm Water Groundwater Grant Agreement No. D19-17008 TA Start Date: September 24, 2021 TA Recipient(s): Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water, PWSID No. CA4500012 Community/System Information: Population Served: 89 (Drinking Water Watch Site 2021) Number of Connections: 27 (Drinking Water Watch Site 2021) Median Household Income (MHI): $74,432 (2015-19 American Community Survey) Community/System Contact(s): Mark Christ, Board President, Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water, [email protected], 530-722-5738 Additional Community/ System Contact: Amended Work Plan No.: 6561-AB Work Plan Title: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Construction Financing Application Assistance Amended Work Plan Submittal Date: February 2, 2022 October 3, 2022 A. Technical Assistance Details Water System Description: The Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water (CRC Mutual), PWSID No. CA4500012, is located within the City of Redding (COR) water system boundaries, at the corner of Forest Hills and Wimbledon streets. The CRC Mutual has 27 connections, all of which are residential. The source of water is a single groundwater well, and the water system includes a 1,500-gallon pressure tank and a distribution system. Current and Past Compliance Issues: The aging water system infrastructure is coming to the end of its useful life. Both the well and 1,500-gallon pressure tank are 60 years old and are degrading. The system also lacks adequate storage capacity and financial resources required for long-term sustainability. There are no current enforcement actions issued to CRC Mutual. Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and Amended Work Plan No. 6571-AB Page 2 of 6 Rev. 03/24/21 Need for Technical Assistance: The CRC Mutual has been in contact with the COR and both are in agreement to consolidate the CRC Mutual into the COR. The COR has already prepared several documents that can assist in the construction application, including 30% Plans, a construction cost estimate and a CEQA Conditional Exemption form. The scope of the project includes the following task: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Construction Application – Preparation of the General, Technical, Environmental and Financial Packages, per the State Water Board Division of Financial Assistance (DFA) guidelines. The content of these four Packages are described on the DFA website and include various engineering, environmental compliance, and related tasks to complete the application. Other TA Providers: No other TA providers are currently involved in TA efforts for this system. Reason for Work Plan Amendment B: This Work Plan Amendment is for a time extension only. The time extension is needed as a result of the length of the negotiation time on an agreement between the City of Redding and UEI, to compensate the City for their time associated with developing the Plans and Specifications, is taking longer than anticipated. B. Summary of Proposed Deliverables and Activities No. Task Notes and Details Regarding Related Activities Lead TA Provider staff/consultant(s) Deliverable & Due Date Budget1 1 Needs Assessment and Work Plan Hold kickoff meeting and prepare meeting notes Identify scope, deliverables, schedule, and budget; solicit and review proposals from team members. Prepare work plan Sacramento State Office of Water Programs (OWP): Randy Marx Completed $ 6,439 2 DWSRF Construction Financing Application: General Package Prepare General Package. PACE: Tom Warnock General Package – 4/15/2022 11/4/2023 $ 4,572 Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and Amended Work Plan No. 6571-AB Page
3 of
6 Rev. 03/24/21 No. Task Notes and Details Regarding Related Activities Lead TA Provider staff/consultant(s) Deliverable & Due Date Budget1 3 DWSRF Construction Financing Application: Technical Package Technical Memorandum Prepare draft and final Technical Memorandum (TM), per DFA guidelines, and meeting COR requirements. Develop all above documents in accordance with the Water Board’s DWSRF construction financing application guidance. PACE: Tom Warnock Technical Memorandum Draft- 4/30/2022 Completed on 10/15/2022 Final- 5/15/2022 5/15/2023 $ 9,908 4 90% Plans and Specs Prepare 90% Plans and Specifications, per DFA guidelines, and meeting COR requirements. City of Redding: Josh Watkins 90% Plans and Specs -5/15/2022 3/15/2023 $ 43,719 5 Technical Package Compile the above documents and complete a Technical Package. PACE: Tom Warnock Technical Package4/15/23 6/15/2023 $ 11,120 6 DWSRF Construction Financing Application: Environmental Package 6a) Copy of CEQA documents filed with the State Clearinghouse and the County Clerk’s office 6b) Environmental Package Prepare CEQA documentation as appropriate (no Federal Cross Cutters required) File CEQA documents with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk’s Office. Prepare and submit all final California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents and notices for the Selected Construction Project to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse. A copy of all such CEQA documents and notices shall also be sent to Division of Financial Assistance. For further guidance contact the Drinking Water Environmental Review Unit Staff. Recipient shall prepare an analysis of environmental alternatives memo for construction projects that are not exempt from CEQA. The analysis of environmental alternatives memo shall discuss the following: PACE: Tom Warnock 6a) Copy of CEQA documents filed with the State Clearinghouse and the County Clerk’s office- 6/15/2022 6/15/2023 6b) Environmental Package – 6/15/2022 6/15/2023 $ 7,500 Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and Amended Work Plan No. 6571-AB Page 4 of 6 Rev. 03/24/21 No. Task Notes and Details Regarding Related Activities Lead TA Provider staff/consultant(s) Deliverable & Due Date Budget1 o A “no project/no action” alternative. o Comparative analysis among the alternatives that includes discussions of beneficial and adverse impacts on the existing environmental, future environmental, and individual sensitive environmental issues associated with the project. o Analysis of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on sensitive environmental resources, if applicable. o Appropriate mitigation measures to mitigate adverse impacts, if appropriate. o Thorough discussion of the rationale for selection of the chosen alternative for the project. For certain projects covered under a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration it may be appropriate to limit analysis of environmental alternatives to a “no project/no action” alternative and the selected project. For further guidance contact the Drinking Water Environmental Review Unit Staff. Complete Environmental Package. 7 DWSRF Construction Financing Application: Financial Security Package Financing Package Prepare DWSRF Construction Financing Application Financial Security Package. OWP: Dakota Keene Financial Package – 5/15/2022 12/31/2022 $ 2,898Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and Amended Work Plan No. 6571-AB Page 5 of 6 Rev. 03/24/21 No. Task Notes and Details Regarding Related Activities Lead TA Provider staff/consultant(s) Deliverable & Due Date Budget1 8 Project Management Provide project management services o Oversight of TA team o Coordinate conference calls and meetings o Ensure quality of deliverables o Upload materials to FAAST as needed o Execute Work Plan o Serve as primary point of contact Monitor project scope, schedule, & budget OWP: Anne Kernkamp Randy Marx 7/15/2022 11/30/2023 $ 13,334 9 Provide Post- Application Support Assist with any follow up items on the application after submission, including assistance with the construction financing agreement. OWP: Anne Kernkamp Randy Marx Deliverable to be Determined- 9/30/2022 10/15/2023 $ 2,668 C. Total Budget (direct costs, including fringe) 1 Budget Category Total Amount Requested Personnel $ 25,339 Expenses and Supplies $ 0 Equipment (>$5,000) $ 0 Travel $ 0 Professional and Consultant Services $ 76,819 Contingency2 (10%) $ 10,216 Total Costs $ 112,374 1 Costs may be shifted between line items upon written approval from the State Water Board Project Manager. Any costs exceeding the total amount requested will require an amendment to this work plan. 2 Use of contingency budget will require written approval from the State Water Board Supervising Engineer. Budget Assumptions: None. Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and Amended Work Plan No. 6571-AB Page 6 of 6 Rev. 03/24/21 D. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Certification Please indicate if all the work you will implement in connection with this work plan is consistent with one of the following CEQA exemptions: Feasibility and planning studies with no ground disturbing activities (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15262) Includes information collection via pilot studies, test wells, boreholes, etc. (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15306) If proposed work includes ground disturbing activities in an area(s) with a potential for environmental impacts, including riparian habitat, wetland, endangered species habitat or sensitive cultural resources areas, you must notify your State Water Board Project Manager of the nature and scope of such work and receive approval prior to commencing ground disturbing activities. Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and
CITY OF REDDING
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
Proposed Fee and Billing Rates for Engineering Services Cascade Racquet Club MWC Water improvements Project
Hours and Fee
City of Redding Staff 2022 hrs fee hrs fee hrs fee
Title Hourly Rate
Project Coordinator $293.71 2 $587 $0 6 $1,762
Associate Civil Engineer $195.71 10 $1,957 8 $1,566 84 $16,440 Assistant Engineer $218.76 $0 $0 12 $2,625
Engineer Tech II $165.42 $0 8 $1,323 84 $13,895
Env. Compliance Manager $169.84 $0 $0 $0
City Surveyor $200.81 $0 2 $402 1 $201
Survey Party Chief $118.24 $0 12 $1,419 $0
Assistant Surveyor $85.65 $0 16 $1,370 2 $171
Expenses:
Bid Advertise in Record Searchlight
Task Totals 12 $2,545 46 $6,080 189 $35,094
Note: Costs for final design, design services during bid & construction periods, and construction management not included. 247
Fee
$43,719
Project Total
Hours
Project
Management
Task 1 Task 2
Data Review and
Topographic Survey
Task 3
90% Design
Prepared By: Kurt Maire, PE
Date: 12/13/2021
EXHIBIT B
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and PROPOSITION 1
TECHN[CAl ASSISTANCE
UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES, INC,
AND
CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
Water Boards ...... '"" "'-' ,--,.-,--""'"" ..... , .. ,,._ """' "'"" ""'
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANT
DRINKING WATER AND WASTEWATER TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND OUTREACH AGREEMENT No. D1612806
AMOUNT: $7,000,000
ELIGIBLE START DATE: September 1, 2016
WORK COMPLETION DATE: August 31, 2019
FINAL DISBURSEMENT REQUEST DATE: November 30, 2019
RECORDS RETENTION TERM END DATE: August 31, 2055
EXHIBIT C
FUNDING
AGREEMENT
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Subcontract - UEI and COR (4.11(e)--Subcontract Between University Enterprises, Inc.and COR)
WHEREAS,
University Enterprises, Inc.
Agreement No. D1612806