Redding City Council
May 16, 2023

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA
May 16, 2023
6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MICHAEL DACQUISTO
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Patrick A. Blewett, Ph.D., Executive Dean, Simpson University C. Roll Call

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please fill out a Speaker

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.org or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council May 16, 2023

Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation. 4(a). Approve Minutes: Regular Meeting of December 20, 2023; and Special Meetings – Closed Session for the following meeting dates: February 21, 2023; March 7, 2023; April 4, 2023; and May 2, 2023.
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Registers No. 19 and 20; and Payroll Registers No. 21 and 22.

4.5(a). Authorize award of Bid Schedule No. 5364, Padmount Distribution Switches, to Federal Pacific, in the amount of $248,502.54, for the Redding Electric Utility.

4.6(b). Approve and authorize the following actions regarding lease and funding agreements with the Shasta County Arts Council:
(1) Approve Funding Agreement (C-2561) for a four-year term with a total cost of $73,144;
(2) Approve Lease Agreement (C-2072) for Old City Hall Arts Center located at 1313 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Number 101-290-046) for no cost, for the period of July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2027; and (3) Authorize the Mayor to execute both agreements upon adoption of the City of Redding 2023-25 Biennial Budget.

4.11(a). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5351 (Job No. 2621) Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Project:
(1) Award to SnL Group, Inc., in the amount of $5,988,883; (2) Approve an additional $775,261 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $429,000 for project development costs; (3) Approve $600,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $60,000; and
(5) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15301(b & c) – Existing Facilities, Section 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303(d) – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures.

4.11(b). Accept Bid Schedule No. 5305 (Job No. 9248-57), City Hall Exterior Painting Project, awarded to Jeff Painting, as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $295,828.10.

4.11(c). Accept Bid Schedule No. 5201 (Job No. 2619), West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project, awarded to Lakmann Builders, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final construction contract cost of $3,450,356.57.

4.11(d). Accept update regarding award of emergency construction contract for replacement of the City of Redding Storm Drain System on Eastside Road, and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

4.11(e). Authorize the following actions relative to Reimbursement Agreement (C-9727) Redding City Council May 16, 2023

(Agreement) with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company for the design and construction of the replacement and upsizing of the sewer line along Trinity Street from Court Street to Continental Street for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision project:
(1) Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for an increase of $1,260,000 for a new total of $3,200,000;
(2) Authorize $100,000 for City Construction Management staff time for the project; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases to the agreement for construction change orders or construction management and inspection up to a total of $100,000.

4.15(a). Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Approve and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Fourth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (C-8721) with Boutin Jones, Inc., increasing the contract amount by $120,000, for a total annual cost of $275,000, and extending the term of the contract from October 26, 2023, to June 30, 2024, for the purpose of labor negotiations; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 88th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $120,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for continued labor negotiations.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

5. APPOINTMENTS

5.1. 5.1--Consider Mayor's reappointment to the Redding Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.

Recommendation:

Accept Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Gene Norton as the Resident Advisory Board Member to the Redding Housing Authority Board of Commissioners to serve the remainder of a four-year term ending December 31, 2025.

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A court challenge to action taken by the City Council on any project or decision may be limited to only those issues raised during the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council during, or prior to, the public hearing.

6.1. 6.1--Public Hearing to consider Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by the City of Redding (City), and Ordinance amending the City's Zoning Ordinance regarding the short-term rental ordinance (Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Section 18.43.180).

Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing, and upon conclusion:
(1) Offer an Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 18, (Zoning), Redding City Council May 16, 2023

Chapter 18.43, (Standards for Specific Land Uses) by amending Section

18.43.180 (Short-Term Rentals), for first reading by title only, waive the first reading;
(2) Direct the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find that adoption of the ordinance is, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378, exempt from environmental review, because the passage of the proposed ordinance is not a project according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

9.5(b). 9.5(b)--Consider Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Recommendation:

Accept Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Third Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

9.10(a). 9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 2023
Recommendation:

Accept the General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.

9.11(f). 9.11(f)--Consider the City of Redding Stormwater Trash Control Measures CostBenefit Evaluation Report.

Recommendation:

Approve the City of Redding Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report and Implementation of Scenario 2; and find that the action is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only
Redding City Council May 16, 2023

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: http://scac.cablecast.tv:8080/CablecastPublicSite/watch/4?channel=1. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.org/. Open the City’s meetings and agendas portal; Click on tab named "Meetings Videos" and select Redding City Council under “Available Archives 2022” select the desired date, then click on “video” to view the meeting.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Minutes: Regular Meeting of December 20, 2023; and Special Meetings – Closed Session for the following meeting dates: February 21, 2023; March 7, 2023; April 4, 2023; and May 2, 2023.

Attachments
Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of February 21, 2023 Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of March 7, 2023 Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of April 4, 2023 Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of May 2, 2023 MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.

Sharlene Tipton, Interim City
Clerk
Packet Pg. 6
160
12/20/2022
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
December 20, 2022, 6:00 PM
The City Council Chambers are fully open to the public in compliance with current guidelines from the California Department of Public Health regarding indoor meetings.

The meeting was called to order by Vice Mayor Mezzano with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter. Mayor Michael Dacquisto was absent.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Sheri DeMaagd, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, City Clerk Pamela Mize, and Executive Assistant Amber DalPoggetto.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Public Works Director Chuck Aukland.

The Invocation was provided by Reverend Ken Ficklin, Unity Church in Redding.

PRESENTATIONS
2A. Presentation of Mayor’s Proclamation declaring March 8, 2023, as Joe Cosca Day in the City of Redding in recognition of his serve to the Senior Citizens of Shasta County.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Steven and Robert Saterini disagreed with the comments Council Member Winter made at the last meeting regarding the selection of Council Member Dacquisto as mayor.

Nick Gardener thanked the Redding Police Department for their assistance with the removal of garbage in his neighborhood. In addition, he expressed concern regarding the rodeo grounds and public-private partnerships.

Steve Kohn opposes parking fees in the downtown area; is unhappy with Council Member Winter’s comments at the last meeting; and stated Indians should be able to do what they want with their land.

Alex Bielecki spoke regarding gambling and lack of space to incarcerate criminals.

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 10; and Payroll Register No. 11.

Accounts Payable Register No. 10 for the period of November 12, 2022, through November 30, 2022, for a total of $21,356,948.72 for check numbers 175700 through 176023, inclusive, ACH Transfer numbers 19027 through 19108 inclusive, Wire Transfer numbers 11963 through 11997, inclusive; and Payroll Register No. 11 for the period of November 13, 2022, through November 26, 2022, for a total of $3,895,961.62 for check numbers 573000 through 573945, inclusive, ACH Transfer numbers 608580 through 608601 inclusive; SUMMARY TOTAL: $25,252,910.34.
4(f). Adopt Ordinance No. 2656, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to Repeal and Reenact Chapter 2.32 (Fire Department).

Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 159
12/20/2022

4.2(a). Authorize the following actions relative to the Alturas Crossing I Project located at 1320 and 1358 Old Alturas Road: (1) authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Development Agreement, (C-9259) with Alturas Crossing, LP, thereby increasing the City of Redding loan by $1,494,416, for a total loan amount of $3,494,416; (2) authorize the City Manager to execute any other documents necessary to modify the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery Multifamily Housing Program grant application and loan documents to facilitate the funding increase; and (3) find that increasing funding for a development is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that the Alturas Crossing construction project was previously found to be exempt pursuant to CEQA Section 15332 (in-fill development projects). The Alturas Crossing construction project has previously been reviewed and determined to meet National Environmental Policy Act compliance.

4.2(b). Adopt Resolution No. 2022-133, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, acknowledging Kennett Court II Apartments is complete pursuant to City of Redding requirements and the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery MultiHousing Program guidelines.

4.2(c). Approve the City of Redding 2022 Shelter Crisis Annual Report; and authorize staff to submit the Report to the corresponding State of California Senate and Assembly Committees by January 1, 2023.

4.5(a). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5139 (Job Nos. 4006-20 and 4010-20) for furnishing Electric Utility trench and excavation work: (1) approve an increase of $500,000 to the bid schedule budget; and (2) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve change orders up to, and not to exceed, the total budget of $1,012,330.

4.8(a). Authorize the sole-source purchase of one Type III wildland engine from Golden State Fire Apparatus, Inc., for a price not to exceed $450,000, which includes inspection trips, delivery, sales tax, and a pre-payment discount.

4.11(a).Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposal Schedule No. 5319, Architectural Services for the Fire Stations Assessment and Modernization Project: (1) award to Nichols, Melburg, and Rossetto (NMR); (2) authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract with NMR for an amount not to exceed $297,950; and (3) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve any amendments up to $30,000.

4.11(b).Award the lowest competitive bids relative to Bid Schedule No. 5329, Rock and Mineral Products, to J.F. Shea, Stimpel-Wiebelhaus, and Tullis, Inc. for the annual purchase of rock, asphalt, and mineral aggregates at an estimated cost of $350,000.

4.11(c).Accept the City of Redding Mitigation Fee Act Report Update, including an accounting of development fees; and adopt Resolution No. 2022-134, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, making findings concerning unexpended funds.

4.11(d).Authorize the following actions relative to the Flood Damage Repair Project within City of Redding park and trail areas: (1) adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program; and (2) approve the Flood Damage Repair Project as described, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines pursuant to Section 15074.

4.11(e).Authorize the following actions relative to the Silverstone Subdivision-Unit 2 (AMND2020-01135/S-2019-00280): (1) accept the improvements in Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2 as satisfactorily complete; (2) adopt Resolution No. 2022-135, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, accepting streets for maintenance and operation; and (3) Instruct the City Clerk to return the related securities to the developer following completion of the warranty period or as directed by the City Engineer upon completion of all obligations.

Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 160
12/20/2022

4.11(f).Authorize the following action relative to the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 5 (S-7- 03/PD-5-04): (1) accept the improvements in Shastina Ranch–Unit 5 as satisfactorily complete; (2) adopt Resolution No. 2022-136, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, accepting streets for maintenance and operation; and (3) instruct the City Clerk to return the related securities to the developer following completion of the warranty period or as directed by the City Engineer upon completion of all obligations.

4.11(g).Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5330 for furnishing liquid chlorine, sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite, and sodium hypochlorite: (1) award to Thatcher Company of California, Inc., and Jones Chemical, Inc., for a total annual evaluated cost of $609,275 (not including tax and freight); (2) authorize the Purchasing Officer to approve the annual contract amendments through December 31, 2027; and (3) authorize the Purchasing Officer to approve price increases per manufacture price increases, inflation, and other market factors.

4.11(h).Authorize the following actions relative to Bid No. 5325 for furnishing various chemicals:
(1) award contracts to Helix Labs, Hill Brothers Chemical Company, and Univar USA, Inc., for a total annual evaluated cost of $298,043.25 through December 31, 2023, (not including sales tax, mill fees, or shipping); (2) authorize staff to purchase various chemicals from each of the suppliers depending on market availability or delays in product delivery; and (3) authorize the Purchasing Officer to approve quarterly rate changes and manufacturer price increases.

4.11(i).Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5333 (Job No. 2608) Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project: (1) award to Mitchell Johnson Construction, Inc., in the amount of $783,954; (2) approve an additional $126,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $45,000 for project development costs; (3) approve $130,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $15,000; and (5) find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301(b) - Existing Facilities.

4.11(j).Accept update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

4.12(a).Approve the Local Appointments List consisting of Exhibits A and B relative to 2023 term expirations and vacancies for City of Redding Boards, Commissions, and Committees to fulfill the requirements of Government Code Section 54972 (Maddy Act).

4.15(a).Adopt Resolution No. 2022-137, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving an amendment to the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization Clerical, Technical and Professional Non-Exempt and Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Wage Rates changing classification titles effective December 25, 2022.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Audette, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, and/or authorized as recommended.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Winter NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto
Resolution Nos. 2022-133 through 2022-137 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Ordinance No. 2656 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 159
12/20/2022

APPOINTMENTS

5.1. Reappointment to the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Munns, to approved the Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Philip Cramer to the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District Board to serve a second two-year term beginning January 1, 2023, and ending December 31, 2024.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Winter NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto
REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

9.1(a) Letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs regarding Fee-to-Trust Application submitted by Redding Rancheria.

City Manager Tippin summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

The following people are opposed to Win-River building a new casino on property they own off of Interstate -5: Marjory Cantrel, Steven, Tom Reemts, Mary Ocasion, Matt Fleming, Steve Williams, Michael Mitchulack, on behalf of the Fly Shop, Joyce Hankin, Pam Hughes, Ron Reece, Noah, Jeanne Jones, David Allred, Kristy Coughlin, on behalf of Sierra Pacific Industries, Jean Morello, and Nick Gardener. Their reasons for opposition include: the area should remain zoned as agricultural; the Tribe is trying of avoid federal law; it will negatively impact some businesses; it will not enhance the beauty of the area; it will bring crime; it does not pay taxes; and there are problems with the environmental impact report.

Chuck Knauer, on behalf of the Carpenter’s Union, and Steve Kohn support the Tribes efforts to build a new casino.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Mayor, seconded by Council Member Munns, to authorized the following actions relative to the Fee-to-Trust Application pertaining to 228.64 acres of land owned by the Redding Rancheria immediately south of the southern terminus of Bechelli Lane, east of Interstate 5, submitted by the Redding Rancheria to Bureau of Indian Affairs: (1) accept report; (2) reaffirm the Redding City Council’s opposition to the Fee-to-Trust Application as stated in the letter submitted to the BIA, dated August 20, 2019; and (3) directed Council Members Audette and Munns to prepare a response to the BIA’s current inquiry of behalf of the City Council, and include additional comments and clarifying information capturing occurrences since August 2019.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Mezzano, Munns, and Winter
NOES: Council Members – Audette
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 160
12/20/2022

9.2(d). Mark Street Emergency Housing Site and the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement with United Way to operate the site.

Assistant City Manager Bade summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) and provided and PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

Kim Moore objects to the location of the Project and stated it will increase risks to community members, and children.

Susan Murray inquired if more pallets will be added later.

Larry Holstead, President/CEO of United Way of Northern California (United Way), shared the vision United Way has for the Project and responded to Council Member’s questions.

Ron Schwab supports for the Project but is concerned that too many loop holes will exists leaving citizens unsafe.

Mitchell Johnson, owner of Tropics Bar, relayed his concern and respects the City’s effort to address the homelessness issue, however, he is afraid it will be harmful to his business.

Discussion amongst the council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Mayor Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Winter, to approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding’s leased property located at 3211 Mark Street (Assessor’s Parcel No. 108-360-026) (Property) and the Mark Street Emergency Housing Site (EHS): (1) approve United Way of Northern California’s (United Way) South Market Micro-Shelter Community Operations and Services Manual (Manual) and Site Plan; (2) authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract with United Way for the operations of the Mark Street EHS that includes eight, single-occupancy sleeping cabins provided at the property, in a total amount not to exceed $150,000; (3) authorize the City Manager to negotiate with United Way a one-year sublease, with a one-year renewal option, and authorize the Mayor to sign the sublease; (4) authorize the City Manager to issue an EHS permit to United Way for the Mark Street EHS that includes up to eight, single-occupancy sleeping cabins and to set the one-year term start date; (5) authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a County of Shasta (County) American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funded agreement for $300,000 and appropriate $150,000 of County ARPA funds to United Way for the operations of the Mark Street EHS; and (6) based on the facts in the record, make the finding that the subject permit is categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) and 15304, Class 4 Minor Alterations to Land and that the National Environmental Policy Act review shows that the project is categorically excluded subject to 58.5 but converted to exempt status.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Mezzano, Munns, and Winter
NOES: Council Members – Audette
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto

9.5(b). Report - City of Redding Electric Utility's Strategic Plan.

Electric Utility Director Nick Zettle summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) and provided and PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Audette, to accept an oral presentation from the Electric Director providing a progress update on the Electric Utility’s 2026 Strategic Plan.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Winter NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 159
12/20/2022

9.9(a). Resolution - hire two (2) Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) Officers.

City Manager Tippin summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Munns, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-138, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 76th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 approving two full time CIRT Officers and appropriating $156,070.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Winter NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto
Resolution No. 2022-138 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

9.15(b).Resolution - California Public Employee's Retirement System (CALPERS) 180-day wait period with regard to re-hiring Jules Marchesseault in the position of Electric ManagerEngineering, effective January 1, 2023.

Assistant City Manager DeMaagd summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Munns, seconded by Council Member Winter, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-139, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving a 180-day wait period exception of Jules Marchesseault as Electric Manager-Engineering for the City of Redding pursuant to Government Code sections 7522.56 and 21224, effective January 1, 2023, for up to 960 hours; and granting the City Manager authority to execute the necessary hiring documentation. The resolution, if approved, would allow retired Electric Manager-Engineering, Jules Marchesseault, to be rehired as an annuitant in the Electric Utility to assist with a special project, extra help needed with the preparation for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Audit of Redding Electric Utility’s Transmission Owner/Transmission Operator (TO/TOP) Compliance program, and the training of the replacement personnel.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Winter NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Dacquisto
Resolution No. 2022-139 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS FOR

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
At Council Member Winters suggestion, a consensus of the Council directed staff to provide information regarding possible opportunities to assist the unhoused, such as day centers.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 160
12/20/2022

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 9:33 p.m. Vice Mayor Mezzano declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Mark Mezzano, Vice Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 20, 2022 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 169
2/21/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
February 21, 2023 5:15 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto, with the following Council Members present: Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter. Council Member Tenessa Audette participated telephonically. All votes were taken by roll call.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart, and Interim City Clerk Sharlene Tipton. Ms. Tipton called the roll prior to leaving the Closed Session meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:15 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 5:55 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Interim Personnel Director Kelley Martinez Employee Organizations:
(1) Local 1934 of the International Association of Fire Fighters; (2) United Public Employees of California – Redding Technical Unit; (3) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 1245 AFL-CIO – Electric Employees; and
(4) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 1245 AFL-CIO Power Production Unit
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3B. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of Litigation
One (1) potential case
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 5:56 p.m.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City Clerk
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of February 21, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 169
3/7/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
March 7, 2023 5:15 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Jack Munns and Julie Winter. Council Member Tenessa Audette participated telephonically and Vice Mayor Mark Mezzano was absent. All votes were taken by roll call.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart, and Interim City Clerk Sharlene Tipton. Ms. Tipton called the roll prior to leaving the Closed Session meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:15 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 5:50 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Interim Personnel Director Kelley Martinez Employee Organizations:
(1) Local 1934 of the International Association of Fire Fighters; (2) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 1245 AFL-CIO Power Production Unit;
(3) United Public Employees of California – Redding Technical Unit; and (4) Redding Independent Employees’ Organization – Clerical, Technical, and Professional Unit
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 5:51 p.m.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City Clerk
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of March 7, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 169
4/4/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
April 4, 2023 5:15 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto, with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart, and Interim City Clerk Sharlene Tipton. Ms. Tipton called the roll prior to leaving the Closed Session meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:15 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 5:58 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Lawson, et al. v. City of Redding, et al.; Shasta County Superior Court Case No. 197195
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3B. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Property Location: Stillwater Business Park, Lots 11b, 12 and 13; Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 054-220-019, 054-260-003,
054-260-004 and 054-260-005
Agency Negotiator: City Manager Tippin
Negotiating Parties: City of Redding and PDC Sacramento LPIV, LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3C. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Property Location: 6550 Lockheed Drive; Assessor’s Parcel No. 054-280-008 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Tippin
Negotiating Parties: City of Redding and County of Shasta Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of April 4, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 170
4/4/2023

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 5:59 p.m.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City Clerk
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of April 4, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 169
5/2/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
May 2, 2023 5:30 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto, with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, and Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart. Ms. Barnhart called the roll prior to leaving the Closed Session meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Dacquisto determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:30 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 5:58 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Interim Personnel Director Kelley Martinez Employee Organizations:
(1) Local Union 1245 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFLCIO – Electric Employees; and (2) United Public Employees of California – Redding Technical Unit Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 5:59 p.m.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, Interim City Clerk
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - Closed Session Meeting of May 2, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Registers No. 19 and 20; and Payroll Registers No. 21 and 22.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:

Accounts Payable:
(1) Register Number 19 for the period April 1, 2023 – April 14, 2023, in the amount of $6,565,663.60 and Register Number 20 for the period April 15, 2023 – April 28, 2023, in the amount of $14,500,790.73.

Payroll:
(1) Register Number 21 for the period April 2, 2023 – April 15, 2023, in the amount of $4,121,543.11 and Register Number 22 for the period April 16, 2023 – April 29, 2023, in the amount of $4,013,156.61.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.

Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 19
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2 Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) Packet Pg. 20
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 19 & 20 and Payroll Register No. 21 & 22 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize award of Bid Schedule No. 5364, Padmount Distribution Switches, to Federal Pacific, in the amount of $248,502.54, for the Redding Electric Utility.

Fiscal Impact
Adequate funding is available in Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) current biennial General System Improvements budget, which includes purchases of all distribution-type switches. These costs include the annual recurring expenditures for installing infrastructure required to maintain reliable electric service.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to award the bid to Federal Pacific and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
This is a routine bid for the purchase of padmount distribution switches. These padmount distribution switches are required to support residential and commercial development and provide emergency replacement of the existing padmount distribution switches presently in service.

Padmount distribution switches are designed to meet the switching and isolating requirements of electrical distribution systems described in REU’s design standards. These devices increase the reliability and operability of the electric distribution system.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5364, Padmount Distribution Switches Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 71
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5364, Padmount Distribution Switches Page 2 On Thursday, April 6, 2023, three bids were opened for padmount distribution switches. Staff analyzed the bids based on the bid price and compliance with specifications in the evaluation process, and Federal Pacific was the apparent low bidder at a cost of $248,502.54.

The product included in Federal Pacific’s bid complies with the specifications, general conditions, and proposal requirements.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Bid Tabulation 5364
Packet Pg. 72
CITY OF REDDING Pg 1 of 1

PURCHASING DIVISION - TABULATION OF BIDS
BID: Padmount Distribution Switches
BID SCHEDULE NO. DATE OF OPENING
5364 Thursday, April 6, 2023

COX TIME OF OPENING
ZETTLE 3:00 P.M.

Qty. UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE 8 $28,963.00 $231,704.00 $32,430.00 $259,440.00 $30,580.00 $244,640.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotal: $231,704.00 $259,440.00 $244,640.00 $0.00
$16,798.54 $18,809.40 $17,736.40 $0.00
Freight (if applicable):

Net Cost Delivered $248,502.54 $278,249.40 $262,376.40 $0.00 Federal Pacific Anixter

DESCRIPTION
2 X 2 Padmount Distibrution Switches
TAX (7.25% )
Manufacturer Federal Pacific S & C Electric
LEAD TIME/CALENDAR DAYS 210 294
Anixter - Benicia
Hubbell
315
M. Kempley, Purchasing
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation 5364 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5364, Padmount Distribution

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following actions regarding lease and funding agreements with the Shasta County Arts Council:
(1) Approve Funding Agreement (C-2561) for a four-year term with a total cost of $73,144; (2) Approve Lease Agreement (C-2072) for Old City Hall Arts Center located at 1313 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Number 101-290-046) for no cost, for the period of July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2027; and
(3) Authorize the Mayor to execute both agreements upon adoption of the City of Redding 2023-25 Biennial Budget.

Fiscal Impact
The financial difference between the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-23 and FY 2023-27 funding agreements is an increase of $4,179. The proposed FY 2023-27 funding agreement provides direct financial assistance in the following amounts: $18,016 in FY 2023-24; $18,016 in FY 2024-25; a three percent increase in FY 2025-26 to $18,556; and $18,556 in FY 2026-27. These amounts will be proposed in the General Fund Biennial Budget request for FY 2023-25 and 2025-27.

The lease agreement proposes no cost of rent to be collected from the Shasta County Arts Council (Arts Council); it does require the City of Redding (City) to continue to maintain the facility, including janitorial supplies, at an estimated cost of $35,000 annually, and utilities (except telephone) with a not-to-exceed cost of $20,500 annually. Funding for these expenditures is included in the proposed FY 2023-25 Biennial Budget and will be included in the FY 2025-27 Biennial Budget.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.6(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 74
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to decline to approve the funding and lease agreements with the Arts Council, or provide staff with alternative direction. Further actions might require the Arts Council to relocate and its services to Shasta County residents would be negatively impacted and severely disrupted.

Background/Analysis
The City and the Arts Council have historically entered into two contractual agreements: a lease agreement for the Old City Hall Arts Center and a funding agreement through which the City provides financial support to the Arts Council. The Arts Council is fulfilling its obligations, under both agreements.

The Arts Council is active in the Redding community by meeting with artists or groups to discuss artistic direction, marketing, infrastructure, operational, and funding needs. The Arts Council has supported projects and programs that includes the following:
(1) "Voices of the Golden Ghosts” – led by award-winning film director, Mark Oliver, the project tells the story of African American miners in Northern California, during the 1852 gold rush. The project consists of a theatrical play and a series of photography exhibitions.
(2) Indigenous Peoples’ History Day – a celebration of the region’s Indigenous Peoples, their traditions, culture, and history. The Indigenous Peoples’ History Day Committee is a diverse group of people representing the many tribes whose lands make up modern-day Shasta County and presents an annual celebration festival in October. (3) The High School Juried Art Competition held in March, which received participants from 13 county high schools; and the Middle School Juried Art Competition, which received works from over 300 middle school students.
(4) The Poetry Out Loud program, with five local high schools competing to build arts competency and participation throughout Shasta County schools. (5) The annual Redding Cultural Cruise which provides music and art to over 600 attendees.

The Redding Cultural District, a state designation awarded to Redding in 2017, continues to contribute to the revitalization efforts of the Downtown core. The Shasta County Arts Council has partnered with several organizations including the City of Redding, VIVA Downtown, The McConnell Foundation, Redding Visitors Bureau, Turtle Bay Exploration Park, and the Shasta Historical Society to continue working on reinforcing the image of Redding as a culturally diverse and vibrant destination not only to out-of-the-area visitors but to new and existing businesses and organizations in Redding.

The four-year FY 2023-27 funding and lease agreements will support the activities of the Arts Council by providing:
• Annual funding support to the Arts Council starting in the amount of $18,016 and increasing three percent to $18,556 in FY 2025-26;
• No cost lease of the facilities for Old City Hall Arts Center to be used by the Arts Council • Building and grounds maintenance for the Old City Hall Arts Center; • Utility expenses (excluding telephone) for the Old City Hall Arts Center; and Packet Pg. 75
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements Page 3 • A City Council-appointed representative to serve on the Board of Directors of the Arts Council.

The Shasta County Arts Council plays a valuable role in the community. The Old City Hall Arts Center provides an affordable venue for many local artists and art organizations. The City’s partnership with the Arts Council improves access to the arts and expands the variety of available artistic experiences, thereby greatly enhancing and enriching the lives of Shasta County residents.

Environmental Review
The adoption of the lease is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. This exemption permits the lease of existing public facilities when there is negligible or no expansion of use. The adoption of this lease does not expand the use of the facility.

This funding agreement is not a project within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and is therefore not subject to CEQA, since it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072)
Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561)
Packet Pg. 76
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Draft Lease Agreement (C-2072) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements) Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Draft Funding Agreement (C-2561) (4.6(b)--Shasta County Arts Council Funding and Lease Agreements)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5351 (Job No. 2621) Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Project:
(1) Award to SnL Group, Inc., in the amount of $5,988,883; (2) Approve an additional $775,261 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $429,000 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $600,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $60,000; and (5) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15301(b & c) – Existing Facilities, Section 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303(d) – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures.

Fiscal Impact
The Lake Boulevard Transmission Water Main Project (Project) is being funded by the Water Utility Fund.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $429,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $6,588,883
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $775,261
Additional City Manager Authority $60,000
Total Project Costs $7,853,144
Project Budget $8,000,000
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5351 (Job Order No. 2621) Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 99
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5351 Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the project is not awarded, there will be a greater potential for increased maintenance costs and a decrease in reliability for City of Redding (City) customers.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on April 20, 2023, for the project. The low bid in the amount of $5,988,883 was received from SnL Group, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $5,207,088. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $429,000. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-ofway, environmental, consultant services, and permit fees.

The purpose of this project is to convey increased quantities of water from the Buckeye Zone to the Hilltop-Dana and Enterprise Zones to provide better reliability and more robust health and safety standards. This project includes the installation of approximately 9,400 feet of new 24- inch water main in Lake Boulevard from Keswick Dam Road to Masonic Avenue. The project also includes the installation of approximately 1,970 feet of new 8-inch water main in Northpointe Road, Redwood Boulevard, Yuletide Avenue, and July Way along with the replacement of approximately 300 feet of storm drain pipe in Keswick Dam Road. In addition, water services will be replaced and reconnected and minor modifications of the Lake Boulevard Bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad will be constructed.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project qualifies as categorically exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301(b & c) – Existing Facilities, Section 15302(c)-Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303(d) – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures. Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consist of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment or the conversion of existing structures. The project will be located in the right-of-way parallel to the existing water line and will result in a negligible expansion of use. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^Bid Tabulation
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 100
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5351 Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Project) Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5351 Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5351 Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(a)--Award BS No. 5351 Lake Boulevard Transmission Watermain Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Schedule No. 5305 (Job No. 9248-57), City Hall Exterior Painting Project, awarded to Jeff Painting, as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $295,828.10.

Fiscal Impact
The project was funded by Building Maintenance Division funds. The total project cost, including design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration, is $295,828.10.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not accept the project as satisfactorily complete, and advise staff on how to proceed.

Background
Jeff Painting has completed all items of work on the City Hall Exterior Painting Project as of February 1, 2023, which was within the contract time frame. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date of February 1, 2023, and the Public Works Department subsequently filed the notice of completion with the County of Shasta.

At its July 19, 2022, meeting, the Council awarded a construction contract to Jeff Painting, of Los Angeles, California, for $177,000 and approved a $35,000 construction contingency fund.

Also authorized was $75,000 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $28,000 for project development costs, and the City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $25,000, for a total authorized amount of $340,000. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services. During construction, the City MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule 5305 Job No. 9248-57, City Hall Exterior Painting Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 105
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2023
Re: 4.11(b)--Project Acceptance BS 5305 City Hall Exterior Painting Project Page 2 Manager allocated contingency funds, in the amount of $25,000, to be used to the cover the cost of change orders, thereby bringing the construction contingency to a total authorized amount of $60,000. There were five change orders in the amount of $59,899.10. The final project cost was $295,828.10.

This project included preparing, sealing, and painting the exterior of the Redding City Hall, Council Chambers, and adjacent accessories such as exterior light poles and the sculpture in front of the Redding Library.

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $28,000.00 $28,000.00
Construction Contract + Contingency $212,000.00
Construction Contract + Contract Change Orders $236,899.10 Contract Administration & Inspection $75,000.00 $30,929.00 Additional City Manager Authority $25,000.00 $0.00
Total $340,000.00 $295,828.10
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On July 19, 2022, the Council determined the project was categorically exempt from review under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15301(a) – Existing Facilities.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Staff Report 7-19-2022
CH Ext Painting Proj Contingency Increase 010623
Packet Pg. 106
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance BS 5305 City Hall Exterior Painting Project) c rv ca
u' ° " ' " ' CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: July 19, 2022 FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public ITEM NO. 4. 11( b) Works Director
APPROVED BY***
M '
y,
u C1 7d, Ptii il Woaks l7iri
d , ''
ct 71 l2Q 2
y p}aun,," 7/( ll fl"! 2
[email protected]. ca.us btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4. 11( b)-- Award Bid Schedule No. 5305 ( Job No. 9248- 57) City Hall Exterior Paintin Pro' ect
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5305 ( Job No. 9248- 57), City Hall Exterior Painting Project:
1) Award to Jeff Painting, in the amount of$ 177, 000;
2) Approve an additional $ 75, 000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; 3) Approve $35, 000 to provide construction contingency funding; 4) Approve $28,000 for project development including environmental and permits; 5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of$25, 000; and 6) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301( a)— Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The City Hall Exterior Painting Project is being funded by Building Maintenance funds available in the current fiscal year.

Cost Summa
Item Estimated
Pro ect Develo ment Costs 28, 000
Construction Contract+ Contin enc 212, 000
Contract Administration, Ins ection, Testin $ 75, 000
Additional Cit Mana er Authorit 25, 000
Total Pro' ect Costs 340, 000
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the proj ect within the approved budget.

Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Staff Report 7-19-2022 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance BS 5305 City Hall Exterior Painting Project) Report to Redding City Council July 10, 2022
Re: 4. 11( b)-- City Hall Exterior Painting Project Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the City Hall Exterior Painting Project and direct building maintenance crews to repair, patch, and paint the exterior concrete stucco walls to minimize storm water from entering and damaging the building( s) during inclement weather.

Background
The Redding City Hall and Council Chambers was built in 1998, and the original paint and special coatings has been maintained by City of Redding ( City) staff over the years. Exterior painting and special coatings have deteriorated over the past 24 years, and the building( s) now require a complete repaint for weather protection and to reduce the ongoing building maintenance.

The project consists of preparing, sealing, and painting the exterior of the Redding City Hall, Council Chambers, and adjacent accessories.

Attached is the tabulation of bids received and opened on July 5, 2022. The low bid in the amount of$ 177, 000 was received from Jeff Painting, of Los Angeles, California. The engineer' s estimate was $ 236, 000. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be 28, 000. Project development costs include engineering and environmental with permits.

Staff has determined that the project qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301( a). Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. The exterior of existing buildings and accessories will be painted to protect and extend the life of the structures. The project will not result in expansion of use, as the project does not include the construction of new facilities. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Bid Tabulation
Location Map
Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Staff Report 7-19-2022 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance BS 5305 City Hall Exterior Painting Project) Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: CH Ext Painting Proj Contingency Increase 010623 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance BS 5305 City Hall Exterior Painting Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Schedule No. 5201 (Job No. 2619), West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project, awarded to Lakmann Builders, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final construction contract cost of $3,450,356.57.

Fiscal Impact
The project was funded by two State of California grant sources: the Active Transportation Program (ATP) (78%) and the Local Streets and Roads Program (22%). The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration, is $3,450,356.57.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project as satisfactorily complete, and advise staff on how to proceed.

Background
Lakmann Builders, Inc., has completed all items of work on the West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project as of November 2, 2022, which was within the contract time frame. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date of November 2, 2022, and the Public Works Department subsequently filed the notice of completion with the County of Shasta.

At its May 18, 2021, meeting, the Council awarded a construction contract to Lakmann Builders, Inc., of Redding, California, for $2,222,111.81 and approved a $210,000 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $285,000 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $525,000 for project development costs, and the City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule 5201 Job No. 2619, West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 111
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP Page 2 contingency amounts up to a total of $15,000, for a total authorized amount of $3,257,111.81.

Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services. During construction, there were areas that needed design changes and quantities adjusted. Additional funds were required to complete the project, and at its April 5, 2022 meeting, the Council approved an increase of $80,000 to the construction management budget and $170,000 to the construction contingency budget. This increased the total authorized amount to $3,507,111.81.

There were 23 change orders in the amount of $340,491.76. The final project cost is $3,450,356.57.

The project included the construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements along West Street from Seventh Street to Eureka Way as well as Magnolia Avenue between North Street and Shasta Street and Magnolia Avenue between Eureka Way and Seventh Street. The improvements included constructing enhanced pedestrian crossings and buffered bicycle lanes; completing sidewalk, curb, and gutter gaps; installing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps; applying micro-surfacing to West Street; and installing additional street lighting. In addition to the safety improvements, trees were planted along West Street between Eighth Street and Tenth Street and miscellaneous storm drain improvements were installed at both the intersections of Eighth Street and West Street, and also Ninth Street and West Street.

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $525,000.00 $526,568.00
Construction Contract + Contingency $2,602,111.81
Construction Contract + Contract Change Orders $2,562,603.57 Contract Administration & Inspection $365,000.00 $361,185.00 Additional City Manager Authority $15,000.00 $0.00
Total $3,507,111.81 $3,450,356.57
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On May 18, 2021, Council determined that the West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project is categorically exempt from review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21
Packet Pg. 112
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve increases to the project budget in the amount of $250,000 for the completion of Bid Schedule No. 5201, West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project as outlined below for additional improvements:
(1) Increase of $80,000 to the construction management budget, bringing the construction management total to $365,000; and
(2) Increase of $170,000 to the construction contingency budget, bringing the construction contingency total to $380,000.

Fiscal Impact
The majority of the project is funded through an Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant.

However, additional funding from the ATP program is not available beyond the original grant amount. Therefore the $250,000 cost increase will come from already budgeted Streets Division funds. The total project cost, including the proposed increase, is expected to be just over $3,500,000.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to reject the request and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: April 5, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve Increase to Project Budget for the West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP) Report to Redding City Council March 31, 2022
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve Increase to Project Budget for West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project Page 2
Background/Analysis
The West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project (Project) is a planned active transportation improvement project designed to provide continuous sidewalk and bicycle facilities, enhanced pedestrian crossings, and other similar improvements on routes leading to three area schools (Shasta High School, University Preparatory School (U-PREP), and Pioneer High School) located off of Eureka Way. The improvements are located along West Street from Seventh Street to Eureka Way as well as Magnolia Avenue between North Street and Shasta Street and between Eureka Way through Seventh Street. Work elements include constructing enhanced pedestrian crossings and buffered bicycle lanes; completing sidewalk, curb, and gutter gaps; installing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps; applying microsurfacing to West Street; and installing additional street lighting. In addition to the safety improvements, trees will be planted along West Street between Eighth Street and Tenth Street and miscellaneous storm drain improvements will be installed at the intersections of Eighth Street and West Street, and also at Ninth Street and West Street.

On May 18, 2021, the Council awarded the construction contract for the Project to Lakmann Builders, Inc. During the course of construction, conditions in the field warranted design revisions to meet the original project intent. These changes include: a re-design of Eighth Street between West Street and Lakeview due to competing design constraints associated with ADA accessibility and drainage, revisions to the main entrance of U-PREP related to incorrect design grade data, design and construction of a concrete electrical transformer structure relocated from a utility pole, modifications necessary to match existing features to the new design layout, and other miscellaneous undocumented items encountered during construction. Often, these changes require significant effort by the contractor to calculate grades, re-work the subgrade, and establish new finish elevations. The noted changes will result in several of the contract bid items exceeding their bid quantities and the additional time needed will increase the construction management services required.

The additional work will cause the project budget to exceed the awarded amounts. An additional $250,000 is requested to cover increases to the construction contingency ($170,000) and construction management ($80,000) project components.

COST SUMMARY
Item Awarded Amount Projected Amount Increase
Contract Administration,
Inspection, Testing
$285,000 $365,000 $80,000
Construction Contingency $210,000 $380,000 $170,000
Totals $495,000 $745,000 $250,000
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
5-18-21 Staff Report (available online)
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5201, (Job No. 2619) West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project:
(1) Award to Lakmann Builders, Inc., in the amount of $2,222,111.81; (2) Approve $285,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $525,000 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $210,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $15,000; and (5) Find that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per section 1530(c) – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project (Project) is being funded by two sources including a state grant from the State of California Active Transportation Program (ATP) (78 percent) and matched with Local Streets and Roads Funding (22 percent).

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $525,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $2,432,111.81
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $285,000
Additional City Manager Authority $15,000
Total Project Costs $3,257,111.81
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

MEETING DATE: May 18, 2021
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5201, West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP) Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2021
Re: 4.11(a)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5201, West St Area School Safety Improv Proj Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not award the bid for the West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project and provide staff with alternative direction. Without this project, much needed pedestrian and bicycle mobility and safety will not be improved, and the project may not be built. In addition, if this project is not awarded, the City of Redding (City) is at risk of losing state funding due to grant requirements for project delivery.

Background/Analysis
The West Street Area School Safety Project is a planned active transportation improvement to provide continuous sidewalk and bicycle facilities, enhanced pedestrian crossings, and other similar improvements on routes leading to three area schools (Shasta High School, University Preparatory School, and Pioneer High School) located off Eureka Way within the City of Redding. This project is included in the City’s Active Transportation Plan and the Regional Transportation Plan.

On December 5, 2017, the Council accepted and appropriated ATP grant funds in the amount of $400,000 for design and environmental documentation for the project. Subsequently, the Council, on March 2, 2021, accepted ATP grant funds in the amount of $2,138,000 for construction and adopted Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 to appropriate the funds that ultimately provides the total project funding of $3,258,000.

Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on April 22, 2021, for the West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project. The low bid in the amount of $2,222,111.81 was received from Lakmann Builders, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $2,254,591.

Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $525,000. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, and consultant services.

The project involves the construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements along West Street from Seventh Street to Eureka Way as well as Magnolia Avenue between North Street and Shasta Street and between Eureka Way through Seventh Street. The improvements include constructing enhanced pedestrian crossings and buffered bicycle lanes; completing sidewalk, curb, and gutter gaps; installing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps; applying micro-surfacing to West Street; and installing additional street lighting. In addition to the safety improvements, trees will be planted along West Street between Eighth Street and Tenth Street and miscellaneous storm drain improvements will be installed at the intersections of Eighth Street and West Street, and also Ninth Street and West Street.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Bid Tab
Location Map
Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP) Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619 ENGINEER'S EST Lakmann Builders, Inc. Builder Solutions, Inc. 4/22/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 2 Implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,825.00 $12,825.00 3 Traffic Control LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 4 Construction Area Signs EA 30 $205.00 $6,150.00 $200.00 $6,000.00 $486.00 $14,580.00 5 Project Funding Sign LS 1 $1,150.00 $1,150.00 $900.00 $900.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 6 Rain Event Action Plans (REAPS) EA 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 $1,900.00 $9,500.00 $160.00 $800.00 7F Excavation (Unclassified) CY 50 $100.00 $5,000.00 $99.00 $4,950.00 $185.00 $9,250.00 8 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 9 Surveying (Construction LS 1 $37,000.00 $37,000.00 $57,600.00 $57,600.00 $61,800.00 $61,800.00 10 Remove Concrete SF 14916 $7.00 $104,412.00 $5.00 $74,580.00 $5.00 $74,580.00 11 Remove Asphalt Concrete SF 19896 $6.00 $119,376.00 $4.00 $79,584.00 $3.50 $69,636.00 12 Concrete Curb and Gutter (4" Vert) LF 769 $59.00 $45,371.00 $40.00 $30,760.00 $44.00 $33,836.00 13 Concrete Curb and Gutter (6" Vert) LF 6181 $61.00 $377,041.00 $40.00 $247,240.00 $48.00 $296,688.00 14 Concrete Curb and Gutter (8" Vert) LF 78 $65.00 $5,070.00 $45.00 $3,510.00 $60.00 $4,680.00 15 Concrete Curb (6") LF 185 $46.00 $8,510.00 $32.00 $5,920.00 $45.00 $8,325.00 16 Sidewalk (4"PCC) SF 32147 $13.00 $417,911.00 $12.00 $385,764.00 $9.00 $289,323.00 17 Concrete (4" DECO) SF 176 $32.00 $5,632.00 $25.00 $4,400.00 $47.00 $8,272.00 18 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 3545 $25.00 $88,625.00 $18.00 $63,810.00 $20.00 $70,900.00 19 Driveway (Residential) SF 4524 $22.00 $99,528.00 $14.50 $65,598.00 $18.00 $81,432.00 20 Driveway (Depressed) SF 3494 $17.00 $59,398.00 $18.00 $62,892.00 $20.00 $69,880.00 21 Cross Gutter SF 1235 $25.00 $30,875.00 $18.00 $22,230.00 $72.00 $88,920.00 22 Asphalt Concrete TON 438 $130.00 $56,940.00 $282.00 $123,516.00 $250.00 $109,500.00 23 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3") CF 2091 $20.00 $41,820.00 $37.27 $77,931.57 $35.00 $73,185.00 24 Asphalt Concrete (Micro Surfacing) SY 13820 $2.50 $34,550.00 $6.53 $90,244.60 $4.50 $62,190.00 25F Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 1667 $100.00 $166,700.00 $100.00 $166,700.00 $220.00 $366,740.00 26 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 3188 $7.00 $22,316.00 $7.18 $22,889.84 $8.00 $25,504.00 27 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 16628 $1.50 $24,942.00 $1.20 $19,953.60 $2.00 $33,256.00 28 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 90 $2.50 $225.00 $1.20 $108.00 $2.50 $225.00 29 Pavement Marker EA 249 $7.50 $1,867.50 $7.20 $1,792.80 $8.00 $1,992.00 30 Remove Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 1045 $4.00 $4,180.00 $1.08 $1,128.60 $4.00 $4,180.00 31 Remove Pavement Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 5185 $1.00 $5,185.00 $0.84 $4,355.40 $1.35 $6,999.75 32 Install Sign EA 21 $430.00 $9,030.00 $400.00 $8,400.00 $450.00 $9,450.00 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619 ENGINEER'S EST Lakmann Builders, Inc. Builder Solutions, Inc. 4/22/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 33 Relocate Sign EA 11 $375.00 $4,125.00 $300.00 $3,300.00 $150.00 $1,650.00 34 Replace Sign EA 3 $175.00 $525.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 $450.00 $1,350.00 35 Pedestrian Barricade Sign (Type 1) EA 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $4,725.00 $4,725.00 36 Beacon (Rectangular Rapid Flashing) 2-pole EA 5 $15,000.00 $75,000.00 $19,200.00 $96,000.00 $8,500.00 $42,500.00 37 Salvage Bench EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 $200.00 $200.00 $500.00 $500.00 38 Relocate Fence LF 373 $80.00 $29,840.00 $100.00 $37,300.00 $25.00 $9,325.00 39 Reset Mailbox EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 $200.00 $200.00 $450.00 $450.00 40 Street Light (Standard & LED Luminaire) EA 5 $6,500.00 $32,500.00 $8,300.00 $41,500.00 $5,800.00 $29,000.00 41 Conductor (#6) LF 437 $5.50 $2,403.50 $10.20 $4,457.40 $6.00 $2,622.00 42 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 151 $55.00 $8,305.00 $55.00 $8,305.00 $16.00 $2,416.00 43 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 286 $70.00 $20,020.00 $50.00 $14,300.00 $16.00 $4,576.00 44 Pullbox (2E) EA 4 $1,800.00 $7,200.00 $200.00 $800.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 45 Abandon Storm Drain EA 4 $1,800.00 $7,200.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 46 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 48 $155.00 $7,440.00 $130.00 $6,240.00 $200.00 $9,600.00 47 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 53 $180.00 $9,540.00 $135.00 $7,155.00 $220.00 $11,660.00 48 Storm Drain Pipe (24" RCP) LF 8 $250.00 $2,000.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $225.00 $1,800.00 49 Catch Basin #3 EA 2 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 50 Catch Basin #3 (modified) EA 4 $6,500.00 $26,000.00 $3,500.00 $14,000.00 $4,500.00 $18,000.00 51 Replace Storm Drain Manhole EA 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 52 Remove Storm Drain Inlet EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 53 Storm Drain Manhole (Modified) EA 3 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,800.00 $8,400.00 $6,500.00 $19,500.00 54 Adjust Manhole EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00 55 Adjust Catch Basin Lid EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $850.00 $850.00 56 Under Sidewalk Drain EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,600.00 $2,600.00 57 Replace Catch Basin Top EA 6 $2,500.00 $15,000.00 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,250.00 $7,500.00 58 Reset Water Valve EA 7 $500.00 $3,500.00 $1,000.00 $7,000.00 $1,600.00 $11,200.00 59 Relocate Water Meter Box EA 9 $1,000.00 $9,000.00 $1,100.00 $9,900.00 $320.00 $2,880.00 60 Replace Water Meter Box EA 35 $550.00 $19,250.00 $450.00 $15,750.00 $360.00 $12,600.00 61 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 62 Relocate Lateral Cleanout EA 7 $1,000.00 $7,000.00 $950.00 $6,650.00 $1,450.00 $10,150.00 63 Reset Lateral Cleanout EA 8 $500.00 $4,000.00 $650.00 $5,200.00 $300.00 $2,400.00 64 Remove 2" CARV Assembly EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $750.00 $750.00 65 Trees EA 12 $917.00 $11,004.00 $2,940.00 $35,280.00 $1,400.00 $16,800.00 Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619 ENGINEER'S EST Lakmann Builders, Inc. Builder Solutions, Inc. 4/22/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 66 Water Meter (5/8") EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $200.00 $400.00 $2,650.00 $5,300.00 67 Electric Valve Assembly EA 2 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $3,360.00 $6,720.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 68 Reduced Pressure Principle Device (1") EA 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $7,800.00 $15,600.00 $9,600.00 $19,200.00 69 Valve (Quick Coupling) EA 2 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 $540.00 $1,080.00 $2,200.00 $4,400.00 70 Irrigation Bubbler EA 24 $50.00 $1,200.00 $300.00 $7,200.00 $245.00 $5,880.00 71 PVC Pipe (0.75") LF 814 $16.00 $13,024.00 $54.00 $43,956.00 $10.00 $8,140.00 72 PVC Pipe (1") LF 10 $18.00 $180.00 $60.00 $600.00 $10.00 $100.00 73 PVC Sleeve (3" SCH 40) EA 1 $30.00 $30.00 $2,160.00 $2,160.00 $500.00 $500.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $2,254,591.00 $2,222,111.81 $2,282,122.75 Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619
4/22/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan LS 1
2 Implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan LS 1
3 Traffic Control LS 1
4 Construction Area Signs EA 30
5 Project Funding Sign LS 1
6 Rain Event Action Plans (REAPS) EA 5
7F Excavation (Unclassified) CY 50
8 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1
9 Surveying (Construction LS 1
10 Remove Concrete SF 14916
11 Remove Asphalt Concrete SF 19896
12 Concrete Curb and Gutter (4" Vert) LF 769
13 Concrete Curb and Gutter (6" Vert) LF 6181
14 Concrete Curb and Gutter (8" Vert) LF 78
15 Concrete Curb (6") LF 185
16 Sidewalk (4"PCC) SF 32147
17 Concrete (4" DECO) SF 176
18 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 3545
19 Driveway (Residential) SF 4524
20 Driveway (Depressed) SF 3494
21 Cross Gutter SF 1235
22 Asphalt Concrete TON 438
23 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3") CF 2091
24 Asphalt Concrete (Micro Surfacing) SY 13820
25F Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 1667
26 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 3188
27 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 16628
28 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 90
29 Pavement Marker EA 249
30 Remove Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 1045
31 Remove Pavement Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 5185
32 Install Sign EA 21
Sunrise Excavating S.T. Rhoades Construction, IncSnL Group, Inc.

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$2,500.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $10,160.00 $10,160.00 $167,000.00 $167,000.00 $143,500.00 $143,500.00 $98,000.00 $98,000.00 $185.00 $5,550.00 $200.00 $6,000.00 $290.00 $8,700.00
$1,550.00 $1,550.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $1,102.00 $1,102.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $2,500.00 $280.00 $1,400.00
$250.00 $12,500.00 $60.00 $3,000.00 $110.00 $5,500.00
$73,600.00 $73,600.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $74,600.00 $74,600.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $56,830.00 $56,830.00 $4.00 $59,664.00 $7.00 $104,412.00 $7.45 $111,124.20
$3.00 $59,688.00 $10.00 $198,960.00 $5.22 $103,857.12
$57.70 $44,371.30 $57.00 $43,833.00 $46.75 $35,950.75
$53.70 $331,919.70 $57.00 $352,317.00 $54.40 $336,246.40 $62.00 $4,836.00 $57.00 $4,446.00 $80.00 $6,240.00
$103.00 $19,055.00 $57.00 $10,545.00 $49.80 $9,213.00
$13.80 $443,628.60 $14.00 $450,058.00 $12.37 $397,658.39 $48.00 $8,448.00 $45.00 $7,920.00 $21.80 $3,836.80
$42.85 $151,903.25 $40.00 $141,800.00 $21.00 $74,445.00 $18.40 $83,241.60 $14.00 $63,336.00 $13.65 $61,752.60
$18.40 $64,289.60 $14.00 $48,916.00 $14.65 $51,187.10
$37.50 $46,312.50 $15.00 $18,525.00 $18.00 $22,230.00
$202.00 $88,476.00 $260.00 $113,880.00 $273.25 $119,683.50 $50.00 $104,550.00 $24.00 $50,184.00 $36.31 $75,924.21
$5.44 $75,180.80 $3.50 $48,370.00 $3.86 $53,345.20
$66.55 $110,938.85 $130.00 $216,710.00 $175.85 $293,141.95 $6.00 $19,128.00 $6.00 $19,128.00 $7.15 $22,794.20
$1.00 $16,628.00 $1.00 $16,628.00 $1.20 $19,953.60
$1.00 $90.00 $1.00 $90.00 $4.40 $396.00
$6.00 $1,494.00 $6.00 $1,494.00 $8.12 $2,021.88
$0.90 $940.50 $0.90 $940.50 $1.35 $1,410.75
$0.70 $3,629.50 $0.70 $3,629.50 $0.95 $4,925.75
$350.00 $7,350.00 $400.00 $8,400.00 $289.00 $6,069.00
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619
4/22/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
33 Relocate Sign EA 11
34 Replace Sign EA 3
35 Pedestrian Barricade Sign (Type 1) EA 1
36 Beacon (Rectangular Rapid Flashing) 2-pole EA 5
37 Salvage Bench EA 1
38 Relocate Fence LF 373
39 Reset Mailbox EA 1
40 Street Light (Standard & LED Luminaire) EA 5
41 Conductor (#6) LF 437
42 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 151
43 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 286
44 Pullbox (2E) EA 4
45 Abandon Storm Drain EA 4
46 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 48
47 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 53
48 Storm Drain Pipe (24" RCP) LF 8
49 Catch Basin #3 EA 2
50 Catch Basin #3 (modified) EA 4
51 Replace Storm Drain Manhole EA 1
52 Remove Storm Drain Inlet EA 4
53 Storm Drain Manhole (Modified) EA 3
54 Adjust Manhole EA 1
55 Adjust Catch Basin Lid EA 1
56 Under Sidewalk Drain EA 1
57 Replace Catch Basin Top EA 6
58 Reset Water Valve EA 7
59 Relocate Water Meter Box EA 9
60 Replace Water Meter Box EA 35
61 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1
62 Relocate Lateral Cleanout EA 7
63 Reset Lateral Cleanout EA 8
64 Remove 2" CARV Assembly EA 1
65 Trees EA 12
Sunrise Excavating S.T. Rhoades Construction, IncSnL Group, Inc.

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$340.00 $3,740.00 $250.00 $2,750.00 $285.00 $3,135.00
$275.00 $825.00 $225.00 $675.00 $242.00 $726.00
$1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,465.00 $2,465.00 $16,000.00 $80,000.00 $12,000.00 $60,000.00 $7,600.00 $38,000.00 $250.00 $250.00 $200.00 $200.00 $1,771.00 $1,771.00
$48.00 $17,904.00 $35.00 $13,055.00 $87.50 $32,637.50
$340.00 $340.00 $135.00 $135.00 $377.00 $377.00
$7,000.00 $35,000.00 $7,500.00 $37,500.00 $5,255.00 $26,275.00 $8.50 $3,714.50 $9.00 $3,933.00 $4.35 $1,900.95
$50.00 $7,550.00 $70.00 $10,570.00 $63.20 $9,543.20
$45.00 $12,870.00 $50.00 $14,300.00 $51.25 $14,657.50
$555.00 $2,220.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 $2,113.00 $8,452.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 $1,150.00 $4,600.00 $8,430.00 $33,720.00 $200.00 $9,600.00 $145.00 $6,960.00 $125.75 $6,036.00
$200.00 $10,600.00 $175.00 $9,275.00 $129.75 $6,876.75
$700.00 $5,600.00 $220.00 $1,760.00 $853.25 $6,826.00
$3,875.00 $7,750.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,107.00 $10,214.00 $6,500.00 $26,000.00 $4,100.00 $16,400.00 $6,834.00 $27,336.00 $8,135.00 $8,135.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $8,618.00 $8,618.00 $640.00 $2,560.00 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $4,136.00 $16,544.00 $8,500.00 $25,500.00 $3,900.00 $11,700.00 $7,757.00 $23,271.00 $350.00 $350.00 $1,950.00 $1,950.00 $4,065.00 $4,065.00 $350.00 $350.00 $845.00 $845.00 $2,235.00 $2,235.00
$2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,735.00 $3,735.00 $1,450.00 $8,700.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $2,320.00 $13,920.00 $200.00 $1,400.00 $1,300.00 $9,100.00 $2,265.00 $15,855.00 $1,260.00 $11,340.00 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 $1,485.00 $13,365.00 $250.00 $8,750.00 $500.00 $17,500.00 $1,742.00 $60,970.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $12,800.00 $12,800.00 $9,760.00 $9,760.00 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 $1,775.00 $12,425.00 $3,633.00 $25,431.00 $200.00 $1,600.00 $600.00 $4,800.00 $2,138.00 $17,104.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $1,675.00 $1,675.00 $4,275.00 $4,275.00 $2,450.00 $29,400.00 $1,100.00 $13,200.00 $1,375.00 $16,500.00 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619
4/22/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
66 Water Meter (5/8") EA 2
67 Electric Valve Assembly EA 2
68 Reduced Pressure Principle Device (1") EA 2
69 Valve (Quick Coupling) EA 2
70 Irrigation Bubbler EA 24
71 PVC Pipe (0.75") LF 814
72 PVC Pipe (1") LF 10
73 PVC Sleeve (3" SCH 40) EA 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Sunrise Excavating S.T. Rhoades Construction, IncSnL Group, Inc.

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$1,200.00 $2,400.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,640.00 $7,280.00 $2,800.00 $5,600.00 $2,900.00 $5,800.00 $3,510.00 $7,020.00 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 $8,000.00 $16,000.00 $8,980.00 $17,960.00 $100.00 $200.00 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 $2,350.00 $4,700.00 $24.00 $576.00 $210.00 $5,040.00 $256.00 $6,144.00
$45.00 $36,630.00 $39.00 $31,746.00 $45.60 $37,118.40
$50.00 $500.00 $39.00 $390.00 $45.50 $455.00
$1,800.00 $1,800.00 $450.00 $450.00 $675.00 $675.00
$2,475,117.70 $2,549,906.00 $2,620,548.70

Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619
4/22/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan LS 1
2 Implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan LS 1
3 Traffic Control LS 1
4 Construction Area Signs EA 30
5 Project Funding Sign LS 1
6 Rain Event Action Plans (REAPS) EA 5
7F Excavation (Unclassified) CY 50
8 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1
9 Surveying (Construction LS 1
10 Remove Concrete SF 14916
11 Remove Asphalt Concrete SF 19896
12 Concrete Curb and Gutter (4" Vert) LF 769
13 Concrete Curb and Gutter (6" Vert) LF 6181
14 Concrete Curb and Gutter (8" Vert) LF 78
15 Concrete Curb (6") LF 185
16 Sidewalk (4"PCC) SF 32147
17 Concrete (4" DECO) SF 176
18 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 3545
19 Driveway (Residential) SF 4524
20 Driveway (Depressed) SF 3494
21 Cross Gutter SF 1235
22 Asphalt Concrete TON 438
23 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3") CF 2091
24 Asphalt Concrete (Micro Surfacing) SY 13820
25F Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 1667
26 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 3188
27 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 16628
28 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 90
29 Pavement Marker EA 249
30 Remove Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 1045
31 Remove Pavement Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 5185
32 Install Sign EA 21
Site Work Solutions

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$4,499.92 $4,499.92
$12,864.79 $12,864.79
$62,393.85 $62,393.85
$222.31 $6,669.30
$1,905.52 $1,905.52
$243.72 $1,218.60
$155.16 $7,758.00
$27,254.56 $27,254.56
$48,552.54 $48,552.54
$5.88 $87,706.08
$5.31 $105,647.76
$56.23 $43,240.87
$54.69 $338,038.89
$107.46 $8,381.88
$68.52 $12,676.20
$13.67 $439,449.49
$42.40 $7,462.40
$40.37 $143,111.65
$26.02 $117,714.48
$28.84 $100,766.96
$28.08 $34,678.80
$362.90 $158,950.20
$58.22 $121,738.02
$7.44 $102,820.80
$97.38 $162,332.46
$7.62 $24,292.56
$1.27 $21,117.56
$1.27 $114.30
$7.62 $1,897.38
$1.15 $1,201.75
$0.89 $4,614.65
$381.11 $8,003.31
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619
4/22/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
33 Relocate Sign EA 11
34 Replace Sign EA 3
35 Pedestrian Barricade Sign (Type 1) EA 1
36 Beacon (Rectangular Rapid Flashing) 2-pole EA 5
37 Salvage Bench EA 1
38 Relocate Fence LF 373
39 Reset Mailbox EA 1
40 Street Light (Standard & LED Luminaire) EA 5
41 Conductor (#6) LF 437
42 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 151
43 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 286
44 Pullbox (2E) EA 4
45 Abandon Storm Drain EA 4
46 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 48
47 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 53
48 Storm Drain Pipe (24" RCP) LF 8
49 Catch Basin #3 EA 2
50 Catch Basin #3 (modified) EA 4
51 Replace Storm Drain Manhole EA 1
52 Remove Storm Drain Inlet EA 4
53 Storm Drain Manhole (Modified) EA 3
54 Adjust Manhole EA 1
55 Adjust Catch Basin Lid EA 1
56 Under Sidewalk Drain EA 1
57 Replace Catch Basin Top EA 6
58 Reset Water Valve EA 7
59 Relocate Water Meter Box EA 9
60 Replace Water Meter Box EA 35
61 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1
62 Relocate Lateral Cleanout EA 7
63 Reset Lateral Cleanout EA 8
64 Remove 2" CARV Assembly EA 1
65 Trees EA 12
Site Work Solutions

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$254.07 $2,794.77
$190.55 $571.65
$952.65 $952.65
$9,527.57 $47,637.85
$471.35 $471.35
$60.34 $22,506.82
$1,247.12 $1,247.12
$9,010.21 $45,051.05
$10.79 $4,715.23
$113.96 $17,207.96
$91.81 $26,257.66
$1,117.38 $4,469.52
$1,548.55 $6,194.20
$229.25 $11,004.00
$242.10 $12,831.30
$664.47 $5,315.76
$4,797.14 $9,594.28
$9,300.52 $37,202.08
$8,665.99 $8,665.99
$2,906.38 $11,625.52
$8,348.34 $25,045.02
$1,964.72 $1,964.72
$1,881.53 $1,881.53
$2,598.27 $2,598.27
$1,818.71 $10,912.26
$712.29 $4,986.03
$2,890.25 $26,012.25
$938.61 $32,851.35
$10,444.36 $10,444.36
$3,121.57 $21,850.99
$856.10 $6,848.80
$1,505.95 $1,505.95
$3,112.35 $37,348.20
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

BID TABULATION FOR:

WEST STREET AREA SCHOOL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Bid Schedule No.: 5201
Job No.: 2619
4/22/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
66 Water Meter (5/8") EA 2
67 Electric Valve Assembly EA 2
68 Reduced Pressure Principle Device (1") EA 2
69 Valve (Quick Coupling) EA 2
70 Irrigation Bubbler EA 24
71 PVC Pipe (0.75") LF 814
72 PVC Pipe (1") LF 10
73 PVC Sleeve (3" SCH 40) EA 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Site Work Solutions

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$3,290.27 $6,580.54
$3,556.97 $7,113.94
$8,257.23 $16,514.46
$571.66 $1,143.32
$317.58 $7,621.92
$57.17 $46,536.38
$63.52 $635.20
$2,286.62 $2,286.62
$2,768,074.40
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP) Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP) Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports 4-05-22 and 5-18-21 (4.11(c)--Project Acceptance BS 5201 West Street Area School SIP)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update regarding award of emergency construction contract for replacement of the City of Redding Storm Drain System on Eastside Road, and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact
Eastside Road Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Project costs will be funded by the Storm Drain Utility Division. The updated estimated total project cost of the repairs is less than $300,000. Staff is working with the contractor to determine the final project costs.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
N&T Digmore, Inc., of Redding, California, began work to remove and replace the damaged storm drain and reconstruct the fill slope on March 27, 2023, and the field work was completed on April 11, 2023. The contractor and staff are finalizing the progress pay estimates and project documentation and will present the Project Acceptance to the Council for consideration in the coming weeks.

The project included the replacement of the failed storm drain pipe across Eastside Road and backfilling the roadway slope to ensure the integrity of the roadway. The work totals less than $300,000 including construction contract work, construction management, and inspection.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Update Regarding Emergency Construction Contract Awarded for Repair of Storm Drain System on Eastside Road.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 130
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd Page 2 Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On March 21, 2023, the Council determined that the Eastside Road Emergency Storm Drain Repair Project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding” Attachments
Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023
Packet Pg. 131

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Eastside Road Emergency Storm Drain Replacement Project (Project) (Job Order No. 2992-21):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote, ratifying the City cy construction contract for emergency replacement of a storm drain system and roadway slope on Eastside Road;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $200,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(4) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

Fiscal Impact
The estimated total Project cost is $300,000. These costs include construction and staff time for construction management and inspections. The Storm Drain Utility Division (Storm Drain Utility) has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget for this project.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead prepare an award to the low bidder in accordance with State and local contracting procedures. This will result in the closure of Eastside Road for an extended period impacting area businesses and residents. There will be an increased risk of roadway failure and potential rupture of the high-pressure gas main posing a significant threat to businesses, property, State Route (Highway) 273, and railroad operations.

MEETING DATE: March 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 2(a)--Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Facility on Eastside Road Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) Report to Redding City Council March 20, 2023
Re: 2(a)­­Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Facility on Eastside Road Page 2 Or, the Council could also provide alterative direction to staff Background/Analysis
The Storm Drain Utility maintains storm drain facilities throughout the City of Redding (City) including inlets, outfalls, pipes, and channels. Located on Eastside Road just south of Haven Humane Society and 1.4 miles north of Latona Road is a 48-inch corrugated metal storm drain pipe. The pipe conveys water from Happy Valley Road, Highway 273, and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks, under Eastside Road and onto City-owned property to the east. The Storm Drain Utility made an expedient repair to the system in 2020 when the outlet to the creek had failed. Today, the connection to the outlet and the remainder of the piping underneath the roadway is failing causing soil erosion to the adjacent road slopes (both sides) and exposing a Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) two-inch gas line. There is also a PG&E 10-inch, high-pressure transmission gas main in the roadway above the failing storm drain pipe. Eastside Road is now temporarily closed due to the concerns of entire roadway failure and damage to the high-pressure gas main.

With forecasts of continued wet weather, and the roadway slope gradually deteriorating, the Storm Drain Utility and Engineering Divisions agreed that time is of the essence to avert the possible threat of a complete roadway failure, damage to the gas lines, and material being washed downstream, and potential flooding of the adjacent roadways. Simply closing the road and re-routing traffic will not mitigate the exigency because the storm water may continue to erode the road bank and undermine the gas line. The expedient need for repairs does not allow time for traditional engineering design and formal competitive bidding.

Staff proposes an emergency contract to replace the failed storm drain pipe and repair the overlying roadway and its adjacent support slope. Staff estimates the work to total less than $300,000 including construction contract work, construction management and inspection. It is further estimated that the work will be complete within two weeks.

It is noted that the Public Contract Code (Section 20168) provides that the legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the PCC
a public agency, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice the City Manager to authorize necessary actions and for the Council to subsequently review and ratify such actions within seven days or at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council. to ensure no further damage to persons, public health or property occurs.

The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project qualifies as categorically exempt from environmental Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) Report to Redding City Council March 20, 2023
Re: 2(a)­­Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Facility on Eastside Road Page 3 review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15301 and Section 15302. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. Class 2 exemptions consist of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. The existing storm drain pipe will be replaced to prevent additional erosion and potential roadway failure. The pipe will be located on the same site, will have substantially the same purpose and capacity, and the project will result in no expansion of use. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
Public Safety
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code

4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and
WHEREAS, on or about March 17, 2023, staff was made aware that the storm water conveyance system under Eastside Road failed a n d i s causing significant erosion and undermining of the roadway; and
WHEREAS, the roadway carries significant truck traffic, is adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, and contains two natural gas pipelines within the roadway section; and WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids will delay the repairs needed to prevent further damage to the roadway, rupture of the natural gas pipelines, flooding of the adjacent roadways, and restore unimpeded traffic flow along Eastside Road; and WHEREAS, failure of the storm water conveyance system and/or the natural gas pipelines would threaten the safety and property of persons nearby; and WHEREAS, isolation of the impacted area so that the delay due to competitive bidding could be accommodated would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property;

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the storm water conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the roadway and adjacent natural gas lines or flooding of the adjacent roadways.

3. The emergency conditions set forth herein will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids and immediate action is necessary to respond to the emergency.

Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd)

4. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore
of an emergency construction contract to repair the storm drain system and roadway along Eastside Road.

5. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of March, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd) Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd)

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: City of Redding 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Public Works Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Shasta County Clerk
County of Shasta
P.O. Box 990880, 1643 Market Street
Redding, CA 96099-0880
Project Title: Eastside Road Storm Drain Emergency Repair Project 2023 Project Location – Specific: Eastside Road just south of Haven Humane Society and 1.4 miles north of Latona Road Project Location – City: Redding Project Location – County: Shasta Description of Project: The City of Redding Public Works Department will conduct an emergency storm drain repair project on Eastside Road. Due to heavy rain, the connection to the outlet and the remainder of the piping underneath the roadway is failing causing soil erosion to the adjacent road slopes. The project includes replacing approximately 80-feet of deteriorated 48-inch corrugated metal pipe, repairing the eroded roadway embankments, paving, and striping. The open trench will either be restored to original condition or covered with steel plates at the end of each day. The project is located within the City right of way and the public will be notified.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Redding Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Ryan Bailey, Assistant Public Works Director Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial [Section 21080(b)(1); 15268]
Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)]
Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)]
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

Common Sense Exemption (This project does not fall within an exempt class, but it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment (14 CCR 15061[b][3]).

Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Section 15301. Existing Facilities and Section 15302.

Replacement or Reconstruction
No exceptions apply that would bar the use of a categorical exemption (PRD 21084 and 14 CCR 15300.2).

Reasons why project is exempt: Class 1 exemptions include the operation and repair of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. The existing storm drain pipe will be replaced to prevent additional erosion and potential roadway failure. The pipe will be located on the same site, will have substantially the same purpose and capacity, and the project will result in no expansion of use. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Amber Kelley Telephone: 530.225.4046 If Filed by Applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.

2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the p
Signature:__________________________ Date:_________________________ Title: Environmental Compliance Manager
Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR:______________ Signed by Applicant
%QFIV/IPPI] 1EVGL   (MKMXEPP]WMKRIHF]%QFIV/IPPI] (2
GR!%QFIV/IPPI]S!'MX]SJ6IHHMRKSY!4YFPMG;SVOW
)RKMRIIVMRKIQEMP!EOIPPI]$GMX]SJVIHHMRKSVKG!97
(EXI






Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Previous Staff Report From March 21, 2023 (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair of Storm Drain Eastside Rd)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Reimbursement Agreement (C-9727) (Agreement) with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company for the design and construction of the replacement and upsizing of the sewer line along Trinity Street from Court Street to Continental Street for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision project:
(1) Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for an increase of $1,260,000 for a new total of $3,200,000;
(2) Authorize $100,000 for City Construction Management staff time for the project; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases to the agreement for construction change orders or construction management and inspection up to a total of $100,000.

Fiscal Impact
The new estimated project budget is $3,400,000. The Wastewater Utility has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget for this project.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve the amendment to the reimbursement agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, for design and construction of the sewer line. The Salt Creek Heights Subdivision development project would be limited as to the number of lots it could develop. The City of Redding (City) would design, bid, and construct the sewer line at a later date as scheduled in the Wastewater Master Plan and the additional lots may be developed at that time.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 139
Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 2 Background/Analysis
As part of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Project Phase 2, the developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, was conditioned (AMND-2017-00160, Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-15-07, and Planned Development Plan Application PD-11-07) to upsize the Trinity Street sewer main downstream of Manholes J6-41, J6-28, and J6-32 (Condition 64). By upsizing the sewer main, effectively increasing the capacity, the development can build an additional 42 units beyond the first phase as entitled. The replacement of the subject sewer main is a project identified in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan and, therefore, eligible for reimbursement in accordance with the conditions of development.

On February 7, 2023, Council approved the original agreement. The project was subsequently advertised for construction bids. Two contractors submitted qualified bids. The low bid is approximately $1,200,000 higher than the engineers estimate that was provided by the developer’s consultant engineer, Sharrah, Dunlap, Sawyer. Consequently, the agreement requires an amendment to reflect the total overall project budget subject to reimbursement. It is anticipated that the developer will award the construction contract to the low bidder, StimpelWiebelhaus Associates, of Redding, CA.

The amendment has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
On February 7, 2023, the Council determined the activity was categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures). No further action is needed.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.

Attachments
First Amendment (C-9727)
020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb
C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement
Packet Pg. 140
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: First Amendment (C-9727) (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: First Amendment (C-9727) (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company for the design and construction of the replacement and upsizing of the sewer line along Trinity Street from Court Street to Continental Street for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision project:
(1) Approve the Agreement in the amount of $1,940,000;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases based on the construction bid amounts or change orders required during the course of construction up to a total of $300,000; and
(3) Find the action categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures).

Fiscal Impact
The design and construction of the sewer main is estimated to total $1,940,000. The Wastewater Utility has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget for this project including any City Manager amounts specified in the recommendation.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve the reimbursement agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, for design and construction of the sewer line. The Salt Creek Heights Subdivision development project would be limited as to the number of lots it could develop. The City of Redding (City) would design, bid, and construct the sewer line at a later date as scheduled in the Wastewater Master Plan and the additional lots may be developed at that time.

MEETING DATE: February 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Report to Redding City Council February 1, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 2 Background/Analysis
As part of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Project Phase 2, the developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, was conditioned (AMND-2017-00160, Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-15-07, and Planned Development Plan Application PD-11-07) to upsize the Trinity Street sewer main downstream of Manholes J6-41, J6-28, and J6-32 (Condition 64). By upsizing the sewer main, effectively increasing the capacity, the development can build an additional 42 units beyond the first phase as entitled. The replacement of the subject sewer main is a project identified in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan and therefore eligible for reimbursement in accordance with the conditions of development.

The proposed agreement was developed in accordance with Council Policy 1502, Developer Participation Agreements. The policy calls for the developer to design and construct the facility in accordance with Public Contract Code with the City approving/inspecting the design and construction of the sewer line to ensure conformance to City of Redding Construction Standards with reimbursement to the developer.

The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project qualifies as categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures). Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing wastewater system will be renovated to meet customer needs and current public safety standards. The project will be located on the same site, will have substantially the same purpose and capacity, and will result in a negligible expansion of use. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Report to Redding City Council February 1, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 3 Attachments
^NOE Trinity Street Sewer
^Trinity Street Offsite Sewer - Exhibit A
Payment Performance Maintenance Bonds_Exhibit B
Trinity Street Reimbursement_signed
Council Policy No. 1502
Redding Municipal Code Chapter 16.20.090

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) APPROVED Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Civil Engineering • Land Planning • Surveying & Mapping Landscape Architecture • Presentation Graphics
320 Hartnell Avenue, Redding, CA 96002
530.221.1792 voice • 530.221.8369 fax • [email protected] SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Exhibit B1
1 PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO.:

PAYMENT (LABOR AND MATERIALS) BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, a Municipal Corporation, in the State of California, as Owner, has on __________, conditionally awarded to ____________________________ as Principal, a Contract to do and perform the following work to-wit:
as will more fully appear in said Contract, the terms and conditions of said Contract being fully incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract and pursuant to Chapter 5 of Title 3 of Part 6 of Division 4 of the California Civil Code (commencing with Civil Code Section 9550), Principal is required to furnish a good and sufficient payment bond to secure payment of the claims to which reference is made in Civil Code Section 9554; NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and ______ _____________________, a corporation duly authorized and admitted to transact business and issue surety bonds in the State of California, hereinafter called Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Owner, and unto all persons or entities entitled to assert a claim against a payment bond under any of the aforesaid Civil Code provisions in the penal sum of __ __________ Dollars ($____________) lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials or equipment furnished or used in performance of the Contract, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Franchise Tax Board or the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the Contractor and all subcontractors with respect to such work or labor, then the Surety shall pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified above. If suit is brought upon this bond, Surety shall pay, in addition to the above sum, all costs, expenses and fees, including attorney's fees, reasonably incurred by any party in successfully enforcing the obligation secured hereby, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, and shall bind Contractor, Surety, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of all persons, companies, corporations, political subdivisions, State agencies and other entities entitled to assert a claim against a payment bond under any of the aforesaid Civil Code provisions, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or to the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. Furthermore, and for valuable consideration, Surety hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2819, 2845, and 2849.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereto set our hands and seals on this day of , .

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Principal
City Attorney By:

ATTEST: (Seal)
Pamela Mize, City Clerk Name of Surety
By: (Seal)
Attorney-In-Fact

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Exhibit B2
2 Bond No.:

PUBLIC WORKS

PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, a Municipal Corporation, as Owner, at its regular meeting held on ____________, has awarded to
as Principal, a contract to do and perform the following work to-wit:
as will more fully appear in said contract, the terms and conditions of said contract being fully incorporated herein by this reference.

WHEREAS, said Principal is required under terms of said contract to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said contract;
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and
as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Owner in the sum of Dollars $
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements in the said contract and any alteration thereof as there provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning and shall indemnify and save harmless the Owner, its officers, and agents as therein stipulated then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and virtue.

As the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications.

If said Owner shall require any further or other bond for its protection in the premises, such further or other bond shall be furnished by the Principal with Surety or Sureties satisfactory to the Owner within ten days after notice of such requirement is given to the Principal, and in case of failure on the part of the Principal to comply with said requirement, the Owner shall have the right, at its option, to terminate said contract with said Principal.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereto set our hands and seals on this day of , .

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Principal
City Attorney By:

ATTEST: (Seal)
Pamela Mize, City Clerk Name of Surety
By: (Seal)
Attorney-In-Fact

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Exhibit B3
3 BOND NO.:

PUBLIC WORKS

MAINTENANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT WE, the undersigned,
as Principal, and
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and authorized to do business in the State if California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF REDDING, hereinafter called Obligee, in the sum
( ) Dollars,
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which well and truly to be made, we do hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns firmly by these presents.

WHEREAS, said Principal has heretofore entered into a contract with the Obligee above named for , and,
WHEREAS, the work called for under said contract has been completed and accepted by said Obligee:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal shall, for a period of one year(s) from and after the ___ day of , , \indemnify the Obligee against any loss or damage directly arising by reason of any defect in the material or workmanship which may be discovered within the period aforesaid, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise the same shall remain in full force and effect.

PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that in the event of any default on the part of said Principal, written statement of the particular facts showing such default and the date thereof shall be delivered to the Surety by registered mail promptly and in any event within ten (10) days after the Obligee or his representative shall learn of such default; and that no claim, suit, or action by reason of any default of the Principal shall be brought hereunder after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the end of the maintenance period as herein set forth.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereto set our hands and seals on this day of , .

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Principal
City Attorney City Attorney By:

ATTEST: (Seal)
Pamela Mize, City Clerk Name of Surety
By: (Seal)
Attorney-In-Fact

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT

DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-21 1502 02-06-01 1 of 2

BACKGROUND
From time to time, it is advantageous for the City to enter into Developer Participation Agreements with private developers for the design and construction of various types of public infrastructure when the work is an integral part of a developer’s project. This is normally done when a developer and City contemplate the developer constructing project related infrastructure with City funding including (but not limited to) impact fees and/or in-lieu park funds.

These agreements are designed to outsource the design, construction and project administration. The Director in charge of the funding source is responsible for developing the scope of work and related agreement describing the infrastructure project (Project) with support from the City Attorney and Public Works Director. The City Engineer and his designees are responsible for administering the agreement and related project development and construction of the Project, unless otherwise directed by the City Manager.

POLICY
The development and administration of a Developer Participation Agreement shall be based on the following guidelines:

Project Scope, Cost and Schedule
All of the elements of the project will be identified and agreed upon by developer and City including relative responsibility, project scope, cost and time frame for completion. These elements will be documented in the agreement.

Developer Participation Agreement
The agreement will be prepared jointly by the Developer and the Director in charge of the funding source and will include review/concurrence by the City Attorney and City Engineer. The Agreement must be approved by City Council prior to any work on the Project. Following are key elements of the agreement:

Funding
The agreement shall stipulate a maximum dollar contribution by the City which shall not be exceeded without City Council approval. The agreement will include estimates of project costs including Project Development and Construction costs.

Project Development
The agreement will include provisions requiring that the Project be designed in accordance with City Construction Standards and include a City quality assurance oversight process.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT

DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-21 1502 02-06-01 2 of 2
Construction
The agreement will require the construction contract (plans, specifications and bid quantities) be developed by the developer and reviewed/approved by the City Engineer before putting the Project out to bid. The construction contract will include, but not limited to, the following key elements:
• Prevailing Wage Requirements
• Non Discrimination Provisions
• Title VI Requirements
• Insurance Requirements
• Contractor licensing requirements
• Department of Industrial Relations registration requirements • Bonding – industry standard payment, performance and maintenance bonds • Subcontracting requirements
• Contract Change Order Provisions
• Other items as required by the City Engineer
Bid and Contract Approval Process
The agreement will include a Public Works-like bidding process with defined City oversight including the following key items:
• Advertisement – advertisement and bid opening dates, publications, etc. • Addendum Procedures
• Bid Opening Procedures
• Bid Protest Process
• City Council Contract Award and Approval Process
Construction Management and City Oversight
The agreement will include the requirement for inspection and City Engineer-approved construction administration oversight. In addition, the agreement will outline the following key elements:
• Developer Quality Control and City Quality Assurance Requirements • Construction Contract Change Orders approval and City concurrence process • Progress Payment Process – City concurrence role
• Labor Compliance process and related City quality assurance Contract Acceptance – agreement to include City Engineer approved notice of completion and City Council acceptance of the project as complete. This will include developer submitting full accounting of project costs before project being presented to City Council.

Amended 05/15/18 by Resolution No. 2018-045

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) A.

1. a.
i.
ii.

2. 3.

4. 16.20.090 - Reimbursement (cash or credit) for construction of facilities.

Reimbursement—A condition of approval and/or a development agreement for a land use entitlement may require an owner or developer of a property to construct certain facility improvements or portions thereof specified in the capital improvement program as updated from time to time. Such direction allows the owner to petition the city council for reimbursement for the cost of specified improvements related to any and all impact fees applied to the project. The petition is allowed if the owner (a) constructs the facility, (b) finances an improvement, (c) makes dedication of land in support of the facility, or (d) utilizes a combination of the above. Reimbursement is subject to an approved agreement.

Reimbursed Improvements—The owner or developer shall only be eligible for improvements included in the capital improvement program project. Frontage improvements as defined below are not considered part of capital improvement program project and are not eligible for reimbursement.

Frontage Improvements.

Roadway—Roadway frontage improvements typically consisting of a one-half section, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscape, bike lane, parking lane, acceleration and deceleration lanes and right- and left-turn lanes leading to those roads and driveways, traffic-control measures for those roads and driveways, and related storm-drain facilities along the entire frontage of the entitled project.

Utilities—Utility frontage improvements include logical and orderly extensions of water, wastewater, storm-drain utilities, streetlights, and communication facilities along the entire frontage of the entitled project.

Reimbursed Value—The reimbursement amount shall be based on the actual value of land dedicated for the facility, actual cost of improvements, and actual costs for engineering and city administration.

Reimbursement Schedule—Upon completion of construction and acceptance of the improvements by the city or financing the improvements in a manner satisfactory to the city council, the owner or developer will be eligible for reimbursement in the year the improvement is programmed in the city's capital improvement program. Reimbursement is available only to the degree funds are available in any given year. If reimbursement cannot be made during one year, the unreimbursed portion will continue in following years until repaid.

Credit and Cash Reimbursement—The owner or developer will be provided reimbursement in the form of development fee credits consistent with fee program and type of improvement. If the amount of the fee credit is less than the amount of the otherwise applicable fee, the property owner shall thereafter pay an amount which, added

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

5. to the credit received for the construction of facilities, equals the fee obligation. If the fee credit is greater than the amount of the otherwise applicable fee, the property owner may be paid the difference from the appropriate impact fee fund, providing funds are available.

Reimbursement Agreement—To implement this section, the city and owner or developer shall enter into a reimbursement agreement prior to incurring any eligible project development and/or construction costs. Reimbursement agreements will be considered for approval by the city council.
(Ord. No. 2500, § 3, 9-3-2013)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Approve and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Fourth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (C-8721) with Boutin Jones, Inc., increasing the contract amount by $120,000, for a total annual cost of $275,000, and extending the term of the contract from October 26, 2023, to June 30, 2024, for the purpose of labor negotiations; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 88th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $120,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for continued labor negotiations.

Fiscal Impact
The increase in expense will total $120,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The addition of this expenditure will cause the Employer Services Fund cash reserves to fall into a negative amount on June 30, 2025. The attached budget resolution allocates the additional costs to all divisions benefiting from Employer Services to alleviate the negative cash balance and restore the recommended five percent reserve.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve the proposed recommendation and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On November 6, 2020, the City contracted with Boutin Jones, Inc. for the purpose of labor negotiations, and, since that time, the firm has successfully negotiated a total of seven labor agreements. Currently, the City is in negotiations with two bargaining units and anticipates beginning bargaining with two additional units this fiscal year. Additional funds are required to allow Boutin Jones, Inc., to continue to represent the City in these labor negotiations.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.15(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(a)--Approve Fourth Amendment to the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement with Boutin Jones, Inc., (C-8721)
Kelley Martinez, Interim
Personnel Director
Packet Pg. 183
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations Page 2 Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

City Manager Goals/Objectives
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Attachments
^Resolution
4th Amendment C8721 Boutin Jones Labor Negotiation
C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc
C-8721 - 1st Amendment - 2021 - Boutin Jones Inc
C-8721 - 2nd Amendment - 2022 - Boutin Jones Inc.

C-8721 - 3rd Amendment - 2022 - Boutin Jones, Inc.

Packet Pg. 184
Resolution No. 2023 - ____
88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -078

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended 2023
Fund Division Description Increase Decrease
111 402 City Clerk 670 -
111 411 City Manager 560 -
111 421 City Treasurer 560 -
111 422 City Attorney 450 -
111 424 Planning and Building Regulation 560 -
111 425 Finance 1,450 -
111 428 Purchasing 340 -
111 429 Personnel 670 -
111 431 Permit Center 560 -
111 432 Building & Code Enforcement 1,220 -
111 434 Planning 1,220 -
111 441 Police Administration 39,600 -
111 461 Fire Administration 560 -
111 462 Fire Suppression 8,860 -
111 463 Fire Prevention 1,900 -
111 501 Engineering 3,710 -
111 511 Streets 1,680 -
111 610 Parks 2,130 -
111 620 Recreation 560 -
111 641 Community Services 560 -
134 821 Airports 900 -
142 851 Electric Administration 450 -
142 852 Electric Power Resource 6,070 -
142 853 Electric Distribution 10,000 -
142 855 Electric Non Op. Resource 560 -
142 888 Customer Service 2,480 -
142 889 Field Operations 1,680 -
143 861 Water 220 -
143 863 Water Treatment 1,120 -
143 864 Water - System Oper & Maint 2,020 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078 INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS BY $120,000 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23.

Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Resolution No. 2023 - ____
88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -078

Fiscal Year Ended 2023 (Continued)
Fund Division Description Increase Decrease
145 870 Wastewater Industrial 560 -
145 871 Wastewater Administration 220 -
145 872 Wastewater Stillwater 1,010 -
145 874 Wastewater Collection 1,680 -
147 801 Storm Drainage 670 -
148 555 West Central 1,230 -
149 550 Solid Waste Administration 1,460 -
149 551 Residential 1,350 -
149 552 Commercial 1,010 -
149 553 Roll-off 220 -
149 556 Resource Recovery 2,350 -
149 557 Transfer Station 1,460 -
149 558 Hazardous Household Waste 340 -
149 559 Roads and Sweeping 220 -
150 890 General Services Warehouse 340 -
151 895 Information Technology 2,020 -
153 810 Fleet 2,130 -
154 891 Building Maint. 900 -
158 894 Records 340 -
162 807 Municipal Utilities 1,460 -
162 867 USA Elect Tech 1,120 -
165 438 G.I.S. 450 -
166 899 Communications 110 -
168 893 Reprographics 340 -
169 815 Volunteer Services 110 -
172 897 Risk Management 670 -
191 993 Rental Rehab Program 140 -
191 994 CDBG Housing Rehab Program 220 -
191 996 HOME Program 150 -
193 930 Housing Authority 870 -
200 989 Redding Area Bus Authority 220 -
230 972 City Housing 190 -
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Resolution No. 2023 - ____
88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -078

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended 2023
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance Use of Funds Source of Funds 111 427 01 Beginning Balance $ - $ 67,820
134 821 01 Beginning Balance 900
142 851 01 Beginning Balance 21,240
143 862 01 Beginning Balance 3,360
145 870 01 Beginning Balance 4,590
147 801 01 Beginning Balance 670
148 555 01 Beginning Balance 1,230
149 551 01 Beginning Balance 8,410
150 890 01 Beginning Balance 340
151 895 01 Beginning Balance 2,020
153 810 01 Beginning Balance 2,130
154 891 01 Beginning Balance 900
158 894 01 Beginning Balance 340
162 807 01 Beginning Balance 2,580
165 438 01 Beginning Balance 450
166 899 01 Beginning Balance 110
168 893 01 Beginning Balance 340
169 815 01 Beginning Balance 110
172 897 01 Beginning Balance 670
191 990 01 Beginning Balance 510
193 930 01 Beginning Balance 870
200 989 01 Beginning Balance 220
230 972 01 Beginning Balance 190
Increase (Decrease) in Revenues Use of Funds Source of Funds 160 816 01 Employer Service Alloc 120,000
Expenditures Use of Funds Source of Funds
111 402 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 670
111 411 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
111 421 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
111 422 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 450
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Resolution No. 2023 - ____
88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -078

Fiscal Year Ended 2023 (Continued)
Expenditures (Continued) Use of Funds Source of Funds
111 424 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
111 425 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,450
111 428 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 340
111 429 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 670
111 431 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
111 432 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,220
111 434 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,220
111 441 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 39,600
111 461 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
111 462 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 8,860
111 463 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,900
111 501 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 3,710
111 511 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,680
111 610 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 2,130
111 620 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
111 641 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
134 821 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 900
142 851 78 Fix Chg Employer Services 450
142 852 78 Fix Chg Employer Services 6,070
142 853 78 Fix Chg Employer Services 10,000
142 855 78 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
142 888 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 2,480
142 889 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,680
143 861 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 220
143 863 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,120
143 864 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 2,020
145 870 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 560
145 871 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 220
145 872 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,010
145 874 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,680
145 875 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,120
147 801 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 670
148 555 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,230
149 550 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,460
149 551 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,350
149 552 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,010
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Resolution No. 2023 - ____
88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -078

Fiscal Year Ended 2023 (Continued)
Expenditures (Continued) Use of Funds Source of Funds
149 553 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 220
149 556 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 2,350
149 557 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,460
149 558 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 340
149 559 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 220
150 890 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 340
151 895 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 2,020
153 810 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 2,130
154 891 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 900
158 894 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 340
162 807 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,460
162 867 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 1,120
165 438 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 450
166 899 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 110
168 893 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 340
169 815 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 110
172 897 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 670
191 993 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 140
191 994 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 220
191 996 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 150
193 930 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 870
230 972 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 190
200 989 01 Fix Chg Employer Services 220
$ 120,000 $ 120,000
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Resolution No. 2023 - ____
88th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021 -078

THAT the purpose is to increase appropriations by $120,000 for fiscal year 2022-2023.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Redding on this _____day of ____________, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) FOURTH

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (C-8721)
The Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8721) dated November 6, 2020, and amended on May 21, 2021, July 8, 2022, and September 15, 2022, between the City of Redding, California, (“City”) a municipal corporation, and Boutin Jones, Inc. (“Consultant”) is amended as follows:

SECTION 2. A. is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed three hundred and seventy dollars ($370.00) per hour in a total amount not to exceed two hundred and seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000) per year (year being defined as July 1st to June 30th). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

SECTION 3. A. is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

A. Consultant shall commence work on or about October 26, 2020, and this Contract shall terminate on June 30, 2024.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement dated November 6, 2020, and amended May 21, 2021, July 8, 2022, and September 15, 2022, shall remain in full force and effect.

The date of this Amendment shall be the date that it is signed by the City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Amendment on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: _________________, 2023 ____________________________________ BARRY TIPPIN, City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
______________________________ ____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk By:

CONSULTANT
DATED: _________________, 2023 ____________________________________ By: GAGE DUNGY, Boutin Jones, Inc.

Taxpayer ID No. 68-0363234
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 4th Amendment C8721 Boutin Jones Labor Negotiation (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor

CITY OF REDDING
777 CYPRESS AVENUE, REDDING, CA 96001
P.O. Box 496071, REDDING, CA 96049- 6071

PAMELA MIZE, CITY CLERK

SHARLENE TIPTON, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
530.225.4447
530.225.4463 FAX
November 9, 2020
Boutin Jones, Inc
Attn: Gage Dungy, Shareholder
555 Capital Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: Consulting and Professional Services Contract, C- 8721 Dear Mr. Dungy,
Enclosed please find the fully executed original of the above referenced Consulting and Professional Services Contract by and between the City of Redding and Boutin Jones Inc. re Labor Negotiations.

If you have any questions regarding this agreement, or if we can be of assistance, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at ( 530) 225- 4044.

Sincerely,
f
Joan Twomey
Executive Assistant
Enclosure
cc: Culley
Grannis
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations)

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding(" City"), a municipal corporation, and Boutin Jones Inc. (" Consultant") for the purpose of Labor Negotiations.

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed three hundred and seventy dollars ($ 370. 00) per hour in a total amount not to exceed seventy thousand ($ 70, 000) per year ( year being defined as July Is' to June 30") unless prior written approval from City. This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty ( 30) calendar days of receipt.

D. During the term of the contract, by mutual agreement, the contract may be amended to convert to a retainer billing basis rather than a standard hourly billing basis.

LC
J
Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 1
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about October 26, 2020. The term of the agreement will be two years.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days' written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3. A. of this Contract exceeds ninety ( 90) calendar days in duration, Consultant' s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City' s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/ or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty ( 30) calendar days' written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten ( 10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City' s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 2
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed , as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party' s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant' s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City' s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/ employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant' s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not be eligible for coverage under City' s workers' compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision ofthis Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of,or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 3
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City' s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three ( 3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant' s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs, expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City' s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City' s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements ofthe Political Reform Act Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant' s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 4
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) L. Notwithstanding Subsection " K" above, by entering into this agreement City agrees that if Consultant represents City in a matter adverse to another person or entity, Consultant' s law firm may represent such other person or entity on matters not substantially related to Consultant' s work for City. In that regard, members of Consultant' s law firm regularly represent clients with tax issues including, but not limited to, property taxes and transient occupancy taxes (" Tax"); with title insurance related issues, including, but not limited to, lien priority and land use (" Title"); and with real property related litigation and transactions, including, but not limited to, conservation easements(" Real Property"). Without limiting the generality ofthe first sentence of this paragraph, City specifically agrees that Consultant' s work for parties adverse to City concerning Tax, Title and Real Property matters are not substantially related to Consultant' s work for the City pursuant to this Contract.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 5
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City' s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability X
Professional Liability ( Errors and Omissions) X
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG- 0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than$ 1, 000, 000 per occurrence and 2, 000, 000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA- 0001 ( Ed. 1/ 87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $ 1, 000, 000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non- owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers' Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than 1, 000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer' s waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

4. Professional Liability ( Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant' s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $ 1, 000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording " but only in the event of a named insured' s sole negligence" or any other verbiage limiting the insured' s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option ofthe City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 6
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant' s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer' s liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty ( 30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty 30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best' s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City' s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 7
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a" claims made" policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945. 6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen( 18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City' s Risk Manager by telephone at ( 530) 225- 4050. No later than three ( 3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City' s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person( s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant' s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782. 8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782. 8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses ( including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney' s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision( A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 8
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) and expenses ( including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney' s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant' s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant' s
inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant
shall respond within thirty ( 30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

Ifthe Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty ( 30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City' s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney' s fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 9
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion ofthis Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions ofthe body ofthis Contract and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 10
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City' s representative for this Contract is Assistant City Manager/ Personnel Director, Sheri DeMaagd, telephone number( 530) 225- 4068, fax number( 530) 225- 4062. All of Consultant' s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the abovenamed person, or to the representative' s designee.

B. Consultant' s representative for this Contract is Gage Dungy, telephone number( 916) 321- 4444, fax number ( 916) 441- 7597. All of City' s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above- named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender( may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile, Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 1 1 Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City: To Consultant:

Sheri DeMaagd Boutin Jones Inc.

Asst City Manager/Personnel Director Gage Dungy, Shareholder 777 Cypress Ave. 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Redding, CA 96001 Sacramento, CA 95814
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/ or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 12
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Contract on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: 2020
BARRY TIP Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

A
PAMELA MIZE, City Jerk BftWIY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
1 COB R. BALDWIN 4r--,4
i

CONSULTANT
Dated: 2020
By: GAGE DUNGY, Boutin Jones Inc.

Tax ID No.: 68- 0363234
Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 13
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Exhibit A (Scope of Work)

SCOPE OF WORK
The Contractor( s) will be expected to provide services identified below. The categories listed represent the minimum services expected to be performed in any given professional labor negotiation. In their response to this Request for Proposal, Contractors shall identify other related services that they will provide. Contractor will work directly with the Assistant City Manager/ Personnel Director as its primary contact and other department directors of the City as needed on the following:

1. Advise and represent the City in negotiations / meet and confer sessions with Unions and Bargaining Groups.

2. Consulting on issues concerning various aspects of employment law, including the Fair Labor Standards Act and Meyers- Millias- Brown Act, as it pertains to union negotiations.

3. Consultation with the City Manager, City Attorney, Assistant City Manager/ Personnel Director, Executive Team and Council Members as applicable.

4. Provide research and consultation on current trends, practices, and community standards of other public employers on a variety of labor related issues.

5. Provide consultation and advice regarding Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) negotiation strategy to the City Manager, City Attorney, Assistant City Manager/ Personnel Director, Executive Team and Council Members as applicable.

6. Recommend strategies for successful outcomes in MOU negotiations, and assist in the development of management proposals and positions for negotiations.

7. Prepare documents for negotiations as applicable.

8. Review all initial materials submitted by Unions and Bargaining Groups.

9. Along with the Assistant City Manager/ Personnel Director, represent the City in negotiations including memorandums of understanding with Unions and Bargaining Groups.

10. Provide regular debriefings for the City Manager, City Attorney, Assistant City Manager/ Personnel Director, Executive Team and Council Members on the status of negotiations as needed. Meetings will include Council session meetings conducted outside of traditional business hours.

11. Act as the City' s management advisor in mediation, fact-finding and related procedures.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 14
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations)

UNIONS AND BARGAINING GROUPS OF THE CITY OF REDDING
The following represents an example of Unions and Bargaining Groups of the City that may require labor negotiations services:

Redding Independent Employees Organization( RIEO)
o Clerical, Technical and Professional Employees, Exp. 8/ 1/ 2018 In Progress)
o Supervisory/ Confidential Employees, Exp. 8/ 1/ 2018 ( In Progress) Peace Officers Association of Redding
Miscellaneous Employees ( Non- sworn), Exp. 12/ 31/ 17 ( In Progress) Sworn Officers, Exp. 5/ 1/ 2020
Redding Police Managers Association, Exp. 11/ 30/ 2020
International Association of Fire Fighters, Exp. 1/ 1/ 18 ( In Progress) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
o Electric Employees, Exp. 5/ 16/ 19
o Maintenance Employees, Exp. 12/ 31/ 18
United Public Employees of California — Local 792, Redding Technical Unit, Exp. 12/ 31/ 2017 ( In Progress)
United Public Employees of California— Local 792, Redding Fire Management Unit, Exp. 05/ 20/ 20
Unrepresented Employees
It should be noted that the above categorization and task identifications are not a prescribed labor negotiation process. It is expected that proposals submitted contain a detailed description of the proposed labor negotiation strategy with the understanding that the process used may vary from bargaining group to bargaining group. The process to be used should include the identification of key points in the process and the submittal of progress reports to the City of Redding as well as identification of key decision points
for the City of Redding.

The City, at its sole option, will reserve the right to direct the contractor to perform only specific and select portions of the labor negotiations process or to conduct the entire labor negotiations process. This option will be exercised on an as needed basis. Prior to each labor negotiation, the City shall approve and assign the personnel to a particular labor negotiation.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 15
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) Exhibit B ( Payment Terms)
Boutin Jones Inc. Cost Proposal
Pricing offered on a time- and- materials basis would be based on the standard hourly rates listed below:

Gage Dungy ( Shareholder) ................$ 370
Associates ..........................................$ 220-$ 295 Paralegal.............................................$ 130 Travel Expense Proposal
The firm will charge for travel time to and from client meetings and/ or contract discussions. The firm will charge for lodging if required for the meetings and/ or contact discussions. The firm will not charge for meals.

Expenses
Unlike many firms, we do not bill for secretarial time or telephone charges. Facsimile transmission are billed at the rate of$. 25 per page for outgoing faxes only. Documents are sent electronically unless specifically requested otherwise, or when electronic transmission is not an option. Copying is charged at fifteen cents ($. 15) per page. Additional prints, postage and special deliveries ( i. e.

Fed- Ex, UPS, DHL, messenger service), and other hired deliveries completed at the request of the client or necessary to comply with court or other deadlines will also be billed to the client.

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 16
Rev. 6/ 15
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: C-8721 - Agreement - 2020 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) z.
r
0 CITY OF REDDING
8 , e o / 777 CYPRESS AVENUE, REDDING, CA 96001
mi 9s
P.O. Box 496071, REDDING, CA 96049-6071

PAMELA MIZE, CITY CLERK

SHARLENE TIPTON, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
530. 225. 4447
530. 225.4463 FAX
May 25, 2021
Boutin Jones, Inc
Attn: Gage Dungy
555 Capital Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: First Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services Contract, C- 8721 Dear Mr. Jones,
Enclosed please find the fully executed original of the above referenced First Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services Contract by and between the City of Redding and Boutin Jones, Inc regarding Labor Negotiations.

If you have any questions regarding this agreement, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at 530) 225- 4044.

Sincerely,
Joan Twomey
Executive Assistant
Enclosure
cc: Culley
Grannis
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: C-8721 - 1st Amendment - 2021 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) FIRST

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ( C- 8721)
The Consulting and Professional Services Contract( C- 8721) dated November 6, 2020, between the City of Redding, California,(" City') a municipal corporation, and Boutin Jones, Inc.(" Consultant") is amended as follows:

SECTION 2. A. is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed three hundred and seventy dollars($ 370. 00) per hour in a total amount not to exceed one hundred thousand($ 100, 000) per year( year being defined as July I" to June 30°i).

This
sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement dated November 6, 2020, shall remain in full force and effect.

The date of this Amendment shall be the date that it is signed by the City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Amendment on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
r
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: 2021
V
v
Al
ARRY TIPPIN, City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BARRY E. DEW LT, City Att ey
014
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk By:

CONSULTANT
DATED: ( / 2021
By:

Taxpayer ID No. 68- 0363234
C
QP
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: C-8721 - 1st Amendment - 2021 - Boutin Jones Inc (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations)

PAMELA MIZE, CITY CLERK

SHARLENE TIPTON, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
530. 225. 4447
530. 225. 4463 FAX
Boutin Jones Inc.

Attn: Gage Dungy, Shareholder
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Second Amendment — C- 8721
Dear Gage Dungy,

CITY OF REDDING
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
PO BOX 496071, Redding, CA 96049-6071
cityofredding. org
July 11, 2022
Enclosed please find the fully executed original of the above referenced Second Amendment to the Consulting and Professional Services Contract by and between the City of Redding and Boutin Jones Inc. regarding to labor negotiations.

If you have any questions regarding this agreement, or if we can be of assistance, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at ( 530) 225- 4044.

Si ncere
Amber DalPoggetto
Executive Assistant
Enclosure
cc: Marjorie Truman
Ellen Grannis
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: C-8721 - 2nd Amendment - 2022 - Boutin Jones Inc. (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) SECOND

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ( C- 8721)
The Consulting and Professional Services Contract ( C-8721) dated November 6, 2020, and amended on May 21, 2021, between the City of Redding, California, (" City") a municipal corporation, and Boutin Jones, Inc. (" Consultant") is amended as follows:

SECTION 2. A. is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the mariner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed three hundred and seventy dollars ($ 370.00) per hour in atotal amount not to exceed one hundred fifty thousand ($ 150, 000) per year ( year being defined as July I' tto June 30t").

This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract.

The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement dated November 6, 2020, and amended May 21, 2021, shall remain in full force and effect.

The date of this Amendment shall be the date that it is signed by the City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Amendment on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: CD 2022 4Z'4 =4WA OK
BU T , City Manager
ATIST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

I
BARRY E. DOA ALT Cit Attor n e
h
4,4 / _-PAMEFA MIZE, CitClerk .. y
11 - By:

CONSULTANT
DATED: 14 _, 2022
By: GAGE DUNGY, Boutin Jones, Inc.

Taxpayer ID No. 68- 0363234
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: C-8721 - 2nd Amendment - 2022 - Boutin Jones Inc. (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations)

PAMELA MIZE, CITY CLERK

SHARLENE TIPTON, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
530. 225.4447
530.225.4463 FAX
Boutin Jones, Inc.

Attn: Gage Dungy, Shareholder
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814

CITY OF REDDI
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
PO BOX 496071, Redding, CA 96049-6071
cityofredding. org
September 16, 2022
RE: Third Amendment — C- 8721
Dear Gage Dungy,
Enclosed please find the fully executed original of the above referenced Third Amendment to the Consulting and Professional Services Contract by and between the City of Redding and Boutin Jones, Inc. regarding additional funds and term extension.

If you have any questions regarding this agreement, or if we can be of assistance, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at ( 530) 225- 4044.

Sincerely,
Amber DalPoggetto
Executive Assistant
Enclosure
cc: Marjorie Truman
Ellen Grannis
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: C-8721 - 3rd Amendment - 2022 - Boutin Jones, Inc. (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations) THIRD

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (C- 8721)
lic k- OHNUILIM Iisroyessiona 72TTUaTe-T-1` ovember 6, 2020, and amended on May 21, 2021, and July 8, 2022, between the City of Redding, California, (" City") a municipal corporation, and Boutin Jones, Inc. (" Consultant") is amended as follows:
11 111, 111 a i mom
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed three hundred and seventy dollars ($ 370. 00) per hour in a total amount not to exceed one hundred fifty- five thousand ($ 155, 000) per year ( year being defined as July I" to June 3 oth) . This sum includes all out- of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract.

The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

SECTION 3. A. is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement dated November 6, 2020, and amended May 21, 2021, and July 8, 2022, shall remain in full force and effect.

MMMMMM4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Amendment on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: 2022
BARRY ,TIPPIN`,--eity Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
PAMELA MIZE, City Clejk By:

CONSULTANT
DATED: 2022
By: GAGE DUNGY, Boutin Jones, Inc.

Taxpayer ID No. 68- 0363234
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: C-8721 - 3rd Amendment - 2022 - Boutin Jones, Inc. (4.15(a)--Amendment to Boutin Jones, Inc Agreement for Labor Negotiations)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Gene Norton as the Resident Advisory Board Member to the Redding Housing Authority Board of Commissioners to serve the remainder of a four-year term ending December 31, 2025.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation.

Background/Analysis
Resident Advisory Board Member Gene Norton’s term expired on December 31, 2021, creating a vacancy. Mr. Norton has expressed interest in continuing to serve on the Redding Housing Authority’s Board of Commissioners and is eligible to be reappointed to a second four-year term.

He is a current member of the Housing Authority’s Resident Advisory Board which is a requirement of this position. If approved, his term will end December 31, 2025.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider Mayor's reappointment to the Redding Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.

Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
Packet Pg. 215

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing, and upon conclusion:
(1) Offer an Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 18, (Zoning), Chapter

18.43, (Standards for Specific Land Uses) by amending Section 18.43.180 (Short-Term Rentals), for first reading by title only, waive the first reading; (2) Direct the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find that adoption of the ordinance is, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378, exempt from environmental review, because the passage of the proposed ordinance is not a project according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the proposed revisions to the Short-Term Rental Ordinance (Ordinance) would require hiring additional staff in the Planning and Code Enforcement Divisions to adequately process and enforce short-term rental permits. Fees collected from issuing short-term rental (STR) permits could offset some or all of the staffing expenses depending on the established fee.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not offer the proposed ordinance for first reading and the regulations pertaining to short-term rentals will remain as they exist currently. The Council could also provide other direction to staff such as modifying the ordinance.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Public Hearing to consider Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by the City of Redding (City), and Ordinance amending the City's Zoning Ordinance regarding the short-term rental ordinance (Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Section 18.43.180).

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 216
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding Page 2 Background/Analysis
In the past year, the topic of short-term rentals has been considered by the Planning Commission (Commission) and the Council numerous times. In addition, community input has been received during public hearings, a community workshop, and a community-wide online survey. Below is a timeline of these actions:

July 19, 2022
The Council received a status update regarding implementation of the City of Redding’s (City) ordinance. Public comment received at the meeting was mixed, with speakers both supporting and opposing tighter regulations for STRs. Following this meeting, the Council and staff continued to receive community feedback regarding STRs, specifically vacation rentals.

August 2, 2022
The Council directed the City Attorney to return with an Interim Urgency Ordinance which would have had the effect of prohibiting the submission and receipt of applications for vacation rental permits.

August 16, 2022
The Council considered, but ultimately did not approve, the Interim Urgency Ordinance; however, the consensus of the Council was that the ordinance should be reviewed and possibly updated. The Council directed staff to return with recommendations for potential amendments to the ordinance for its consideration.

October 18, 2022
The Council reviewed staff’s suggested modifications to the ordinance and provided further direction to staff to craft a revised ordinance. The ordinance revisions would then need to be brought before the Commission, and then subsequently to the Council for consideration.

January 10, 2023
The Commission reviewed the ordinance and subsequently provided comments, recommendations, and proposed approvals to submit to the Council for consideration. During the Commission meeting, the concept of a committee to study this issue was vocalized.

February 21, 2023
The Council did not hold a public hearing or consider adoption of revisions to the ordinance, but instead provided direction to staff to form a Director’s ad-hoc committee consisting of City staff and seek additional community input for the purpose of developing new recommended modifications to the ordinance.

March 8 – March 26, 2023
Staff developed a basic online survey asking for community feedback on topics ranging from density limits, overall caps, parking requirements, and more. The survey ran for over two weeks and over 500 surveys were completed by the community.

March 16, 2023
Staff held a public workshop to hear the community’s input and answer questions. The workshop was held at the City Hall Community Room and was well attended.

Packet Pg. 217
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding Page 3 April 25, 2023
Based on the Council’s direction from its February 21, 2023 meeting, a Director’s ad-hoc committee was formed and recommended changes to the ordinance were presented to the Commission at its April 25, 2023 meeting. The Commission was largely supportive of staff’s recommended changes to the ordinance, and provided comments and recommendations for the Council’s consideration.

Listed below, the proposed ordinance revision appears first followed by the Commission’s recommendation and comments in italics, as they were provided to staff at the April 25, 2023 Commission meeting.

Density
(1) Limit the number of rentals within a geographic area based on distance. a. 500-foot radius of an existing permitted vacation rental. b. At the discretion of the Director, reduction down to 300 feet separation may be considered when there are natural buffers such as major arterials, rivers, and creeks.

Planning Commission supports this revision.
(2) Provide a cap of 400 vacation rental permits to be allowed at any one time.

Planning Commission supports this revision, albeit by a narrow margin of 4-3.

Vacation Rental Criteria
(3) Location
a. Prohibit on properties containing an accessory dwelling unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020, in compliance with State law governing accessory dwelling units.
b. Exempt vacation rentals in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District from the parking and density requirements.

Planning Commission supports this revision. Commissioner Miner expressed concern regarding a. above, noting that state law specifically prohibits accessory dwelling units (ADUs) built after January 1, 2020, from being used as STRs, but doesn’t actually prohibit properties with ADUs from having STRs. The Commission discussed, but ultimately a majority of the Commissioners supported keeping staff’s recommended language.
(4) Owner Criteria - Must be a “natural person,” trustee of a living trust, or limited liability company.

Planning Commission was concerned the original language requiring the owner to be a “natural person,” trustee of a living trust, or limited liability company was too narrow, and perhaps unintentionally left out other partnerships or company formations that would be beneficial to STR owners and operators. Therefore, staff has revised this language to simply state that “any natural person signing an application on behalf of an owner shall have legal authority to bind the owner.”
Packet Pg. 218
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding Page 4 (5) Permit Criteria
a. Require site manager information to be kept current at all times. b. Revise the maximum occupants per bedroom from two adults to two persons. c. Limit the occupancy to 16 persons.
d. Require an inspection by City staff prior to issuance of the permit. e. Require a log of vehicle information including make, model, color and license plates of all tenant vehicles.
f. Reduce site manager’s response time from 60 minutes to 45 minutes. g. When applying, the applicant must state the number of on-site parking spaces are available to tenants, but in no case shall it be less than two on-site spaces. h. Parking in excess of the stated number of on-site parking is not permitted. i. Tenants are not permitted to park on the street.
j. All advertisements shall include the number of permissible parking spaces. k. All required parking spaces shall remain accessible and available to tenants at all times during the rental periods.
l. Notification of application shall be sent to property owners within 600 feet of the applicant’s property.
m. The appeal period of a decision on vacation rental applications is 15 days.

Planning Commission supports a. through m. above, with the exception of e. This is primarily because the Commissioners consider it an unnecessary complication and burden on STR operators and site managers. Staff, however, feel this will be relatively simple to implement, and it will help enforce the parking standards of the ordinance, therefore, the language has remained as presented.

Hosted Homestay Criteria
(6) The floor plan documenting which rooms are to be rented is required. (7) An affidavit is required to be signed on an annual basis. (8) Will expire twelve (12) months from issuance and is subject to a requirement for renewal. (9) The owner shall be the applicant. Other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being rented. (10) No owner shall cook, prepare, or serve for consumption, food of any kind for consumption by the short-term-rental tenant.

Planning Commission supports revisions 6 through 10.

Suspension and Termination
(11) Language regarding suspension and termination has been added.

Planning Commission supports this revision.

Legal Non-Conforming Uses
(12) Language has been added to address grandfathering under the existing Non-Conforming Regulations of the Zoning Code including allowances for temporary hardship and longterm rental.

Packet Pg. 219
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding Page 5 Planning Commission supports this revision. There was some discussion regarding the temporary hardship and long-term rental allowances, and staff has revised this language to clarify the intent.

As previously noted to the Council, should the proposed changes to the ordinance be adopted, additional staff resources would be necessary to process permit applications and adequately enforce those permits. Specifically, if the required notification area to neighbors is increased from 300 feet to 600 feet, this could be a significant time commitment for staff. Additionally, increased enforcement and development of tools such as a short-term rental web portal with centralized information for the public, for example, will require additional staff time and resources. Increasing the annual permit application fee (currently $1,169) could assist in providing the necessary funds to support additional staffing. At this point, it is estimated that one additional Planning position and one additional Code Enforcement position is necessary. Staff will return to the Council with a proposal for an adjusted fee and prepare an accompanying budget resolution requesting and justifying additional staffing resources for consideration and approval.

Environmental Determination
The passage of the proposed ordinance is not a project according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review. No further actions are necessary.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Draft New Ordinance
Strikeout Ordinance
Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023
Packet Pg. 220

DRAFT NEW ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.43 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) BY AMENDING SECTION 18.43.180 (SHORT TERM RENTALS),

THEREBY MAKING CHANGES TO THE STANDARDS FOR

REGULATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.43 (Standards for Specific Land Uses), Section 18.43.180 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

18.43.180 Short-Term Rentals
A. The purpose of this Section is to establish an appropriate permitting process and standards for Short-Term Rental of dwelling units throughout the City; to provide a visitor experience and accommodation as an alternative to the typical hotel, motel, and bed and breakfast accommodations customarily permitted in the City; to minimize potential negative secondary effects of Short-Term Rental use on surrounding residential neighborhoods; to retain the character of the neighborhoods in which any such use occurs; and ensure the payment of required transient occupancy taxes.

B. Types of Short-Term Rentals. For purposes of this Section, the following Short-Term Rental facilities are established:

1. Hosted Homestay. An owner-occupied “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section

18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” with more than one habitable room, excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, individual overnight room accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days.

2. Vacation Rental. An entire “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, overnight accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days and the owner may or may not reside within the dwelling unit for the term of the rental.

C. Short-Term Rental Permit Requirements. No person shall use, advertise, or market for use, any dwelling unit on any parcel in any zoning district for Short-Term Rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The following approval process is established:

Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

1. Hosted Homestay: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Zoning Clearance from the Director and providing an affidavit certifying that the owner understands, agrees to, and is in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Applicants may be required to provide a site plan or other information determined necessary by the Director to determine compliance with this Section and shall pay an application fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council. Permits for Hosted Homestays shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

2. Vacation Rental: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Site Development Permit issued by the Director in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures and Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits of this Code, except that Site Development Permits for Vacation Rentals shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

D. Districts in Which Permitted. The regulations of this chapter apply to Short-Term Rentals in all zoning districts.

E. General Requirements - Hosted Homestay.

1. No more than one dwelling unit on a lot may be used at any one time.

2. A maximum of two rooms may be available for rent at any time. A floor plan shall be submitted with the affidavit indicating the rooms for rent.

3. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two persons per rented room. Room rental shall be limited to a maximum of 180 rental days per calendar year.

4. The owner shall be the applicant, and other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being provided for rent.

5. At the time of permit renewal, the property owner shall attest they understand and agree to the Hosted Homestay requirements by signing the Hosted Homestay Affidavit available at the Development Services Department and any payment due must be remitted.

6. Except as set forth in Section 18.43.060 as it relates to licensed bed and breakfast inns, no owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the Short-Term-Rental tenant.

7. The applicant shall state in the application the number of on-site parking spaces available to tenants, but in no case shall it be less than two on-site spaces. ShortPacket Pg. 222 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Term-Rental tenant parking spaces shall be within the primary driveway or other on-site location. No tenant parking in excess of this number of on-site parking spaces is permitted. No tenant is permitted to park on the street. External changes to a property such as converting significant areas of front yard landscape for purposes of meeting parking requirements is not allowed.

8. All required on-site parking spaces (including garage parking if identified at time of approval) shall be accessible and available to Short-Term-Rental tenants at all times during the rental periods.

9. Short-Term Rentals shall meet all applicable building, health, fire and related safety codes at all times, including provision of working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.

10. The applicant shall post emergency evacuation instructions and "house policies" within each Short-Term-Rental tenant bedroom. The house policies shall be included in the rental agreement, and shall be enforced by the applicant. At a minimum, the house policies should:
a. Reinforce the City of Redding’s Noise Standards (RMC Section 18.40.100) by establishing outdoor "quiet hours" between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to minimize disturbance to neighboring residences. Outdoor activities are prohibited during “quiet hours.”
b. Require that Short-Term-Rental tenant vehicles be parked on the premises, not the street in compliance with this Section.

11. The property shall not be used to host non-applicant related weddings, parties, and other similar events.

12. On-site advertising signs or other displays indicating that the residence is being utilized as a Short-Term Rental are prohibited.

13. No person shall advertise a Short-Term Rental on any media platform when such advertisement or notice contains an inaccurate or misleading statement of the requirements of, or indicate amenities not allowed by the Redding Municipal Code including the number of parking spaces.

14. All advertisements shall include the number of permissible parking spaces.

15. A City business license shall be obtained and transient occupancy taxes paid in accordance with Chapter 4.12 as required. All advertising for any Short-Term Rental shall include the City of Redding transient occupancy tax number and the City of Redding business license number assigned to the applicant. With submittal of transient occupancy taxes, the applicant shall also submit a statement indicating the number of Short-Term-Rental tenant stays, and the number of Short-TermPacket Pg. 223 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Rental tenants for the reporting period.

16. The permit is not transferrable to a subsequent property owner or to another property.

17. This ordinance shall not be construed as waiving or otherwise impacting the rights and obligations of any individual, group, or the members of any homeowner’s association, as defined, to comply with or enforce CC&R’s and no permit shall be issued when it is demonstrated by substantial evidence that issuance of a permit will be in contradiction to any recorded CC&R’s or other record providing record notice of a restriction on the use of the property.

F. General Requirements - Vacation Rentals.

1. With the exception of items 1 through 46 listed in Section 18.43.180(E) above, the General Requirements provisions for Hosted Homestays shall apply to Vacation Rentals.

2. The following additional provisions shall also be applicable to Vacation Rentals which may be supplemented by requirements established by the Director with approval of the required Site Development Permit as necessary to maintain compatibility of the use with the surrounding properties. a. A Vacation Rental shall not be permitted on properties as follows:

1. Containing an Accessory Dwelling Unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020 in compliance with Government Code Section 65852.2, as may be amended from time to time; or

2. Within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing permitted Vacation Rental except that, at the discretion of the Director or appellate body as the case may be, within a three hundred (300) foot radius of an existing Vacation Rental when there is a buffer such as a major arterial, rail right-of-way, flood control channel or stream corridor between the Vacation Rental units.
b. The total number of Vacation Rentals in the City shall not exceed four hundred (400) rentals at any one time.
c. The owner shall be the applicant and any natural person signing an application on behalf of an owner shall have legal authority to bind the owner.
d. A Vacation Rental shall not be rented to multiple separate parties concurrently.

Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) e. The applicant shall keep on file with the City the name, telephone number, and email address of a local contact person who shall be responsible for responding to questions or concerns regarding the operation of the Vacation Rental. This information shall be posted in a conspicuous location within the Vacation Rental dwelling. The local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours a day to accept telephone calls and respond physically to the Vacation Rental within forty-five (45) minutes, if necessary. The name and contact information of the local contact person will be made available to the public. The contact information shall be kept current at all times. f. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) persons per rented room.
g. The maximum number of persons on the property at any time shall be limited to sixteen (16) persons.
h. Prior to issuance of a permit, a physical inspection of the dwelling unit and property shall be conducted by City staff.
i. Each operator shall maintain a log of each Short-Term-Rental tenant’s vehicle(s). The log shall minimally consist of the rental period, the license plate, make, model, and color for each vehicle. The log shall be made available at any time upon request by the City.
j. The requirements listed in Subdivisions E(7), E(8), E(14), and F(2)(a)(2) shall not apply to a Vacation Rental located within Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District. Notwithstanding Subdivision B(2), an apartment unit located in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District may be permitted as a Short-Term Rental.

G. Application Required.

1. Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a Short-Term Rental use shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council and apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter

18.11 (Common Procedures), except that notices of the Vacation Rental application shall be sent to all owners of real property within six hundred (600) feet of the applicant’s property for a fifteen (15) calendar-day notification period.

2. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny any application, including an application for renewal, for a Hosted Homestay or Vacation Rental, the Director, or appellate body as the case may be, may also consider any factor pertinent to the health, safety and welfare of the immediate neighborhood or public generally including, but not limited to, ability to comply with the provisions set forth in this Section, evidence of operation in violation with Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) this Section, complaints of neighbors, code enforcement activity, timeliness of business permit renewal, timeliness or non-payment of transient occupancy tax, proximity of the property to group homes, residential care facilities, and other neighborhood and site characteristics.

3. Appeal of any determination to approve or deny any application, including an application for renewal, shall be in accordance with Section 18.11.090.

H. Suspension and Termination.

1. The Director, or appellate body, shall apply the criteria set forth in Section

18.43.180(G)(2) in determining whether any permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be suspended or terminated. Notice shall be provided to the applicant pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 18.11.060.

2. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Vacation Rental Permit shall be in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.11.090.

3. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Hosted Homestay Permit must be made to the Planning Commission within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Director’s decision, and appeal of the Planning Commission decision to the City Council must be made within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Planning Commission’s determination. Decisions of the City Council are final, and all challenging a decision of the Director must exhaust all remedies set forth in this Section 18.43.180(H)(3) prior to bringing a challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

4. Service shall be deemed effective upon the earliest of: 1) announcement by the approving or appellate body of the decision in the presence of the appellant; 2) personal service on the appellant of a written notice of decision; or 3) deposit of a written notice of decision in the United States Mail.

I. Legal Non-Conforming Uses

1. Continuation and abandonment of short term rentals which are legal nonconforming uses shall not be governed by Section 18.46.020. The sole allowances for continuation of a legal non-conforming use as a short term rental are by timely renewal of a valid and current short term rental permit or as follows:
a. A temporary hardship allowance of not more than six (6) months may be granted by the Director of Development services, or designee, if: 1) a medical condition of the permittee, spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member jeopardizes the ability of the owner to operate the ShortTerm Rental; or 2) the death of a spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member of the permittee jeopardizes the ability of the permittee to operate the Short-Term Rental.

Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) b. A long-term rental allowance may be granted by the Director of Development Services, or designee, if the permittee provides proof of a long-term lease of twelve (12) months or longer prior to the expiration of the Short-Term Rental permit. This exemption may be repeated if the conditions set forth in this subsection are met. The length of an exemption shall not exceed the term of the lease or twenty-four (24) months, whichever is shorter. If an allowance is granted pursuant to this subdivision, the existing permit shall terminate per its term. However, the Director of Development Services shall consider said permit to be “active” solely for the purpose of allowing the permittee to reapply for a permit after the allowance granted pursuant to this subdivision has lapsed.

J. Enforcement and Remedies. Enforcement of the provisions of this Section include the civil and equitable remedies as permitted by state law, the issuance of a citation and fine, or other legal remedy as provided by Chapter 1.12 through 1.15, inclusive, of the Redding Municipal Code. Upon notification by the City, any Short-Term Rental operating in violation of the requirements of this Section must terminate operations immediately.

Further, a Site Development Permit issued under the authority of this Section may be revoked in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 18.11 (Common Procedures).

Section 2. The Council hereby finds and determines that the enactment of this Ordinance is exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”) because it has no potential to result in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the “common sense” exemption (14 CCR 15061(b)(3)), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision will remain in effect to the extent permitted by law.

Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) calendar days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 2
nd day of May, 2023, and was duly read and adopted
at a regular meeting on the ____ day of _______, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_______________________________ ____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
DATE ATTESTED: May ____, 2023
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

STRIKEOUT ORDINANCE
OLD LANGUAGE: STRUCK OUT
NEW LANGUAGE: UNDERLINED
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.43 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) BY AMENDING SECTION 18.43.180 (SHORT TERM RENTALS),

THEREBY MAKING CHANGES TO THE STANDARDS FOR

REGULATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS

18.43.180 Short-Term Rentals
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish an appropriate permitting process and standards for short-term rentalShort-Term Rental of single-family dwellings and dwelling units located inthroughout the Downtown Redding Specific Plan areaCity; to provide a visitor experience and accommodation as an alternative to the typical hotel, motel, and bed and breakfast accommodations customarily permitted in the City; to minimize potential negative secondary effects of short-term rentalShort-Term Rental use on surrounding residential neighborhoods; to retain the character of the neighborhoods in which any such use occurs; and ensure the payment of required transient occupancy taxes.

B. Types of Short-Term Rentals. For purposes of this Section, the following Short-Term Rental facilities are established:

1. Hosted Homestay. An owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) occupied single-family dwelling unitAn owner-occupied “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” with more than one habitable room, excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, individual overnight room accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days.

2. Vacation Rental. An entire dwelling unit“Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section

18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, overnight accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days and the owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) may or may not reside within the dwelling unit for the term of the rental.

C. Short-Term Rental Permit Requirements. No person shall use, advertise, or market for use, any dwelling unit on any parcel in any zoning district for short-term rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The provisions of this Section apply to all existing and future short term rentals as defined in this Section. Existing short term rental facilities shall either apply for, or obtain authority to operate, within sixty days of the effective date of this ordinance. Short-term rentals located within the Downtown Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Redding Specific Plan area shall follow the process set forth for hosted homestays defined in subsection (C)(1) of this Section. Short-Term Rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The following approval process is established:

1. Hosted Homestay: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Zoning Clearance from the Director and providing an affidavit certifying that the owner understands and, agrees to, and is in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Applicants may be required to provide a site plan or other information determined necessary by the Director to determine compliance with this Section and shall pay an application fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council. Permits for Hosted Homestays shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

2. Vacation Rental: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Site Development Permit issued by the Director in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures and Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits of this Code, except that site development permitsSite Development Permits for Vacation Rentals shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and needare subject to be renewed annuallya requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

D. Districts in Which Permitted. The regulations of this chapter apply to short-term rentalsShort-Term Rentals in all zoning districts.

E. General Requirements - Hosted Homestay.

1. No more than one dwelling unit on a lot may be used at any one time for short term rental purposes.

2. A maximum of two rooms may be available for rent at any time. A floor plan shall be submitted with the affidavit indicating the rooms for rent.

3. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two adultspersons per rented room.

Room rental shall be limited to a maximum of 180 rental days per calendar year.

4. The property owner owner shall be the applicant, and other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being provided for rent.

5. At the time of permit renewal, the property owner shall attest they understand and agree to the Hosted Homestay requirements by signing the Hosted Homestay Affidavit available at the Development Services Department and any payment due must be remitted.

Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

6. Except as set forth in Section 18.43.060 as it relates to licensed bed and breakfast inns, no owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the Short-Term-Rental tenant.

5.7. The applicant shall state in the application the number of on-site parking A minimum of one on-site space shall be provided for each room rented. Guestspaces available to tenants, but in no case shall it be less than two on-site spaces. ShortTerm-Rental tenant parking spaces shall be within the primary driveway or other on-site location. No tenant parking in excess of this number of on-site parking spaces is permitted. No tenant is permitted to park on the street. External changes to a property such as converting significant areas of front yard landscape for purposes of meeting parking requirements is not allowed.

8. All required on-site parking spaces (including garage parking if identified at time of approval) shall be accessible and available to Short-Term-Rental tenants at all times during the rental periods.

6.9. Short-Term Rentals shall meet all applicable building, health, fire and related safety codes at all times, including provision of working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.

7.10. The ownerapplicant shall post emergency evacuation instructions and "house policies" within each guestShort-Term-Rental tenant bedroom. The house policies shall be included in the rental agreement, and shall be enforced by the ownerapplicant. At a minimum, the house policies should:
a. Reinforce the City of Redding’s Noise Standards (RMC Section 18.40.100) by establishing outdoor "quiet hours" between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to minimize disturbance to neighboring residences. Outdoor activities are prohibited during “quiet hours.”
b. Require that guestShort-Term-Rental tenant vehicles be parked on the premises, not the street in compliance with this Section.

8.11. The property shall not be used to host non-ownerapplicant related weddings, parties, and other similar events.

9.12. On-site advertising signs or other displays indicating that the residence is being utilized as a short term rental, isShort-Term Rental are prohibited.

13. No person shall advertise a Short-Term Rental on any media platform when such advertisement or notice contains an inaccurate or misleading statement of the requirements of, or indicate amenities not allowed by, the Redding Municipal Code including the number of parking spaces.

14. All advertisements shall include the number of permissible parking spaces.

Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

10.15. A City business license shall be obtained and transient occupancy taxes paid in accordance with Chapter 4.12 as required. All advertising for any short-term rentalShort-Term Rental shall include the City of Redding transient occupancy tax number and the City of Redding business license number assigned to the ownerapplicant. With submittal of transient occupancy taxes, the operatorapplicant shall also submit a statement indicating the number of guestShort-Term-Rental tenant stays, and the number of guestsShort-Term-Rental tenants for the reporting period.

11.16. The permit is not transferrable to a subsequent property owner or to another property.

12.17. This ordinance shall not be construed as waiving or otherwise impacting the rights and obligations of any individual, group, or the members of any homeowner’s association, as defined, to comply with or enforce CC&R’s, and no permit shall be issued when it is demonstrated by substantial evidence that issuance of a permit will be in contradiction to any recorded CC&R’s or other record providing record notice of a restriction on the use of the property.

F. General Requirements - Vacation Rentals.

1. With the exception of items 1 through 46 listed in Section 18.43.180(E) above, the General Requirements provisions for Hosted Homestays shall apply to Vacation Rentals.

2. The following additional provisions shall also be applicable to Vacation Rentals which may be supplemented by requirements established by the Director with approval of the required Site Development Permit as necessary to maintain compatibility of the use with the surrounding properties. a. A Vacation Rental shall not be permitted on properties as follows:

1. Containing an Accessory Dwelling Unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020, in compliance with Government Code Section 65852.2, as may be amended from time to time; or

2. Within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing permitted Vacation Rental except that, at the discretion of the Director or appellate body as the case may be, within a three hundred (300) foot radius of an existing Vacation Rental when there is a buffer such as a major arterial, rail right-of-way, flood control channel or stream corridor between the Vacation Rental units.
b. The total number of Vacation Rentals in the City shall not exceed four hundred (400) rentals at any one time.

Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) c. The owner shall be the applicant and any natural person signing an application on behalf of the owner shall have legal authority to legally bind the owner.
a.d. A Vacation Rental shall not be rented to multiple separate parties concurrently unless the owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) is residing on the premises during the rental period, in which case the vacation rental shall be limited to two unrelated parties.
b.e. The owner/applicant shall keep on file with the cityCity the name, telephone number, and email address of a local contact person who shall be responsible for responding to questions or concerns regarding the operation of the vacation rental.Vacation Rental. This information shall be posted in a conspicuous location within the vacation rentalVacation Rental dwelling.

The local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours a day to accept telephone calls and respond physically to the vacation rentalVacation Rental within sixtyforty-five (45) minutes, if necessary. The name and contact information of the local contact person will be made available to the public. The contact information shall be kept current at all times. c. Depending of the physical nature of the property and surrounding properties, the director may allow, with approval of the site development permit, on-street guest parking.
f. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) persons per rented room.
g. The maximum number of persons on the property at any time shall be limited to sixteen (16) persons.
h. Prior to issuance of a permit, a physical inspection of the dwelling unit and property shall be conducted by City staff.
i. Each operator shall maintain a log of each Short-Term-Rental tenant’s vehicle(s). The log shall minimally consist of the rental period, the license plate, make, model, and color for each vehicle. The log shall be made available at any time upon request by the City.
j. The requirements listed in Subdivisions E(7), E(8), E(14), and F(2)(a)(2) shall not apply to a Vacation Rental located within Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District. Notwithstanding Subdivision B(2), an apartment unit located in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District may be permitted as a Short-Term Rental.

G. Application Required.

Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Where a Site Development Permit is required by this section, applicants for a short-term rental use shall apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, and shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the city council. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny and application, the director may consider such factors, including but not limited to, proximity of the property to other vacation rentals, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes, and residential care facilities, and neighborhood and site characteristics.

1. Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a Short-Term Rental use shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council and apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter

18.11 (Common Procedures), except that notices of the Vacation Rental application shall be sent to all owners of real property within six hundred (600) feet of the applicant’s property for a fifteen (15) calendar-day notification period.

2. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny any application, including an application for renewal, for a Hosted Homestay or Vacation Rental, the Director, or appellate body as the case may be, may also consider any factor pertinent to the health, safety and welfare of the immediate neighborhood or public generally including, but not limited to, ability to comply with the provisions set forth in this Section, evidence of operation in violation with this Section, complaints of neighbors, code enforcement activity, timeliness of business permit renewal, timeliness or non-payment of transient occupancy tax, proximity of the property to group homes, residential care facilities, and other neighborhood and site characteristics.

3. Appeal of any determination to approve or deny any application, including an application for renewal, shall be in accordance with Section 18.11.090.

H. Permit Renewal.

Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a short-term rental use shall apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, and shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the city council. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application, the director may consider such factors, including but not limited to, prior complaints from neighbors and code enforcement activity, timeliness of business license renewal, timeliness of Transient Occupancy Tax submittals, proximity of the property to other vacation rentals, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes, and residential care facilities, and neighborhood and site characteristics.

H. Suspension and Termination.

1. The Director, or appellate body, shall apply the criteria set forth in Section

18.43.180(G)(2) in determining whether any permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be suspended or terminated. Notice shall be provided to the applicant pursuant Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) to the procedure set forth in Section 18.11.060.

2. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Vacation Rental Permit shall be in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.11.090.

3. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Hosted Homestay Permit must be made to the Planning Commission within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Director’s decision, and appeal of the Planning Commission decision to the City Council must be made within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Planning Commission’s determination. Decisions of the City Council are final, and all challenging a decision of the Director must exhaust all remedies set forth in this Section 18.43.180(H)(3) prior to bringing a challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

4. Service shall be deemed effective upon the earliest of: 1) announcement by the approving or appellate body of the decision in the presence of the appellant; 2) personal service on the appellant of a written notice of decision; or 3) deposit of a written notice of decision in the United States Mail.

I. Legal Non-Conforming Uses.

1. Continuation and abandonment of short term rentals which are legal nonconforming uses shall not be governed by Section 18.46.020. The sole allowances for continuation of a legal non-conforming use as a short term rental are by timely renewal of a valid and current short term rental permit or as follows:
a. A temporary hardship allowance of not more than six (6) months may be granted by the Director of Development services, or designee, if: 1) a medical condition of the permittee, spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member jeopardizes the ability of the owner to operate the ShortTerm Rental; or 2) the death of a spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member of the permittee jeopardizes the ability of the permittee to operate the Short-Term Rental.
b. A long-term rental allowance may be granted by the Director of Development Services, or designee, if the permittee provides proof of a long-term lease of twelve (12) months or longer prior to the expiration of the Short-Term Rental permit. This exemption may be repeated if the conditions set forth in this subsection are met. The length of an exemption shall not exceed the term of the lease or twenty-four (24) months, whichever is shorter. If an allowance is granted pursuant to this subdivision, the existing permit shall terminate per its term. However, the Director of Development Services shall consider said permit to be “active” solely for the purpose of allowing the permittee to reapply for a permit after the allowance granted pursuant to this subdivision has lapsed.

Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) I.J. Violations/Revocations. Enforcement and Remedies. Enforcement of the provisions of this Section may include the civil and equitable remedies as permitted by state law, the issuance of a citation and fine, or other legal remedy as provided by Chapters 1.12 through

1.15, inclusive, of the Redding Municipal Code. Upon notification by the City, any short term rentalShort-Term Rental operating in violation of the requirements of this Section must terminate operations immediately. Further, a Site Development Permit issued under the authority of this Section may be revoked in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 18.11 (Common Procedures).

Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Strikeout Ordinance (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing, and upon conclusion, recommend that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Title 18, Zoning, of the Redding Municipal Code as it pertains to short term rentals.

Background/Analysis
The Short-Term Rental Ordinance has been before Planning Commission and Council numerous times in the past year. In addition, community input has been received during public hearings, a community workshop, and a community-wide online survey. Below is a timeline of these actions:

July 19, 2022 – The Council received a status update regarding implementation of the City of Redding’s (City) ordinance. Public comment received at the meeting was mixed, with speakers both supporting and opposing tighter regulations for short-term rentals. Following this meeting, the Council and staff continued to receive community feedback regarding short-term rentals, specifically vacation rentals.

August 2, 2022 – The Council directed the City Attorney to return with an Interim Urgency Ordinance which would have had the effect of prohibiting the submission and receipt of applications for vacation rental permits.

August 16, 2022 – The Council considered, but ultimately did not approve, the Interim Urgency Ordinance; however, the consensus of the Council was the ordinance should be reviewed and possibly updated. The Council directed staff to return with recommendations for potential amendments to the ordinance for its consideration.

MEETING DATE: April 25, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(b)2
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)2-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by the City of Redding, to consider an amendment to the City’s Zoning Ordinance pertaining to modifications to the shortterm rental requirements (Section 18.43.180).

Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission April 20, 2023
Re: 4(b)2-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 2 October 18, 2022 – The Council reviewed staff’s suggested modifications to the ordinance and provided further direction to staff to craft a revised ordinance. The ordinance revisions would then need to be brought before Planning Commission (Commission), and then subsequently to the Council for consideration.

January 10, 2023 – The Planning Commission reviewed the ordinance and subsequently provided comments, recommendations, and proposed approvals to submit to the Council for consideration. During the Planning Commission meeting, the concept of a committee to study this issue was vocalized.

February 21, 2023 – The Council did not hold a public hearing or consider adoption of revisions to the ordinance, but instead provided direction to staff to form a Director’s ad-hoc committee and seek additional community input for the purpose of developing new recommended modifications to the ordinance. rentals.

March 8 – March 26, 2023 - Staff developed a basic online survey asking for community feedback on topics ranging from density limits, overall caps, parking requirements, and more. The survey ran for over two weeks and over 500 surveys were completed by the community.

March 16, 2023 – Staff held a public workshop to hear the community’s input and answer their questions. The workshop was held at the City Hall Community Room and was well attended.

Based on the feedback received during public hearings at Council and Planning Commission, direction provided by Council Members and Planning Commissioners, as well as the results of the online community survey and feedback received during the public workshop, the Director’s ad-hoc committee has new recommended changes to the ordinance for Planning Commission’s consideration.

The proposed text amendments are summarized below. While staff has made significant revisions from the version that came before Planning Commission on January 10, 2023 (staff report attached), some proposed revisions remain the same. In such cases, Planning Commission’s support, or lack thereof, as provided to staff during the January 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting is indicated in italics.

Density
(1) Limit the number of rentals within a geographic area based on distance. a. 500-foot radius of an existing permitted vacation rental. b. At the discretion of the Director, reduction down to 300 feet separation may be considered when there are natural buffers such as major arterials, rivers, and creeks.

Planning Commission originally supported this proposed revision, which previously included 1,000 feet separation on the same street. The 1,000 foot separation requirement has been removed.

Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission April 20, 2023
Re: 4(b)2-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 3 (2) Provide a cap of 400 vacation rental permits to be allowed at any one time.

Planning Commission did not originally support this proposed revision. The Commission was of the opinion that the combination of the proposed density requirement and enforcement of the ordinance would eliminate those rentals that are not willing to comply with the regulations.

Thereby, a maximum cap on the number is units is unnecessary.

Vacation Rental Criteria
(3) Location
a. Prohibit on properties containing an accessory dwelling unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020 in compliance with State Law governing accessory dwelling units.
b. Exempt vacation rentals in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District from the parking and density requirements.
(4) Owner Criteria - Must be a “natural person,” trustee of a living trust, or limited liability company.

Planning Commission originally supported this proposed revision when it only included “natural person.” New proposed language allows for owners to be a trustee of a living trust or a limited liability company.
(5) Permit Criteria
a. Require site manager information to be kept current at all times. b. Revise the maximum occupants per bedroom from two adults to two persons. c. Limit the occupancy to 16 persons.
d. Require an inspection by City staff prior to issuance of the permit. e. Require a log of vehicle information including make, model, color and license plates of all tenant vehicles.
f. Reduce site manager’s response time from 60 minutes to 45 minutes. g. When applying, the applicant must state the number of on-site parking spaces are available to tenants, but in no case shall it be less than two on-site spaces. h. Parking in excess of the stated number of on-site parking is not permitted. i. Tenants are not permitted to park on the street.
j. All advertisements shall include the number of permissible parking spaces. k. All required parking spaces shall remain accessible and available to tenants at all times during the rental periods.
l. Notification of application shall be sent to property owners within 600 feet of the applicant’s property.
m. The appeal period of a decision on vacation rental applications is 15 days.

Planning Commission originally supported the proposed revisions listed above, a through f including item m. Items g through l above are revised criteria regarding parking and notification area.

Hosted Homestay Criteria
(6) Require floor plan to document rooms to be rented.
(7) Require affidavit to be signed on an annual basis.

Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission April 20, 2023
Re: 4(b)2-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 4 (8) Will expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal.
(9) The owner shall be the applicant. Other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being rented. (10) No owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the short-term-rental tenant.

Planning Commission originally supported the proposed revisions listed from 6 through 9. Item 10 is a new proposed criterion.

Suspension and Termination
(11) Language regarding suspension and termination has been added.

Planning Commission originally supported this proposed revision, the language has been retained.

Legal Non-Conforming Uses
(12) Language has been added to address grandfathering under the existing Non-Conforming Regulations of the Zoning Code including allowances for temporary hardship and longterm rental.

Planning Commission did not originally support the previous proposal to amortize existing vacation rentals that did not comply with the density regulations. The Commission noted that the existing rentals that would not comply with the density regulations should be grandfathered in under the existing Non-Conforming Regulations of the Zoning Code.

Issue
Should the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to the short-term regulations of the Redding Municipal Code? Alternatives
The Planning Commission has the option of recommending that the City Council adopt or not adopt the proposed amendments or directing staff to modify the proposed amendments prior to consideration by the Council. Should changes be requested, the Commission should provide clear direction to staff.

Environmental Determination
The passage of the proposed ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Planning Commission Authority
Section 18.10.030 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the Planning Commission to make recommendations to the City Council on amendments to Title 18.

Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission April 20, 2023
Re: 4(b)2-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 5 Conclusion
Adoption of the proposed amendments to the short-term regulations of the Redding Municipal Code would enhance the existing and clarify the intent of the existing regulations and provide additional flexibility in the administration of the Code. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission recommend adoption of the proposed amendments by the Council.

Attachments
Draft Strikeout Ordinance
Draft New Ordinance
Planning Commission Staff Report - January 10, 2023
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

STRIKEOUT ORDINANCE
OLD LANGUAGE: STRUCK OUT
NEW LANGUAGE: UNDERLINED
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.43 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) BY AMENDING SECTION 18.43.180 (SHORT TERM RENTALS),

THEREBY MAKING CHANGES TO THE STANDARDS FOR

REGULATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS

18.43.180 Short-Term Rentals
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish an appropriate permitting process and standards for short-term rentalShort-Term Rental of single-family dwellings and dwelling units located inthroughout the Downtown Redding Specific Plan areaCity; to provide a visitor experience and accommodation as an alternative to the typical hotel, motel, and bed and breakfast accommodations customarily permitted in the City; to minimize potential negative secondary effects of short-term rentalShort-Term Rental use on surrounding residential neighborhoods; to retain the character of the neighborhoods in which any such use occurs; and ensure the payment of required transient occupancy taxes.

B. Types of Short-Term Rentals. For purposes of this Section, the following Short-Term Rental facilities are established:

1. Hosted Homestay. An owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) occupied single-family dwelling unitAn owner-occupied “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, with more than one habitable room, where, for compensation, individual overnight room accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days.

2. Vacation Rental. An entire dwelling unit“Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section

18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, overnight accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days and the owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) may or may not reside within the dwelling unit for the term of the rental.

C. Short-Term Rental Permit Requirements. No person shall use, advertise, or market for use, any dwelling unit on any parcel in any zoning district for short-term rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The provisions of this Section apply to all existing and future short term rentals as defined in this Section. Existing short term rental facilities shall either apply for, or obtain authority to operate, within sixty days of the effective date of this ordinance. Short-term rentals located within the Downtown Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Redding Specific Plan area shall follow the process set forth for hosted homestays defined in subsection (C)(1) of this Section. Short-Term Rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The following approval process is established:

1. Hosted Homestay: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Zoning Clearance from the Director and providing an affidavit certifying that the owner understands and, agrees to, and is in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Applicants may be required to provide a site plan or other information determined necessary by the Director to determine compliance with this Section and shall pay an application fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council. Permits for Hosted Homestays shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

2. Vacation Rental: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Site Development Permit issued by the Director in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures and Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits of this Code, except that site development permitsSite Development Permits for Vacation Rentals shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and needare subject to be renewed annuallya requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

D. Districts in Which Permitted. The regulations of this chapter apply to short-term rentalsShort-Term Rentals in all zoning districts.

E. General Requirements - Hosted Homestay.

1. No more than one dwelling unit on a lot may be used at any one time for short term rental purposes.

2. A maximum of two rooms may be available for rent at any time. A floor plan shall be submitted with the affidavit indicating the rooms for rent.

3. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two adultspersons per rented room.

Room rental shall be limited to a maximum of 180 rental days per calendar year.

4. The property owner owner shall be the applicant, and other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being provided for rent.

5. At the time of permit renewal, the property owner shall attest they understand and agree to the Hosted Homestay requirements by signing the Hosted Homestay Affidavit available at the Development Services Department and any payment due must be remitted.

Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

6. Except as set forth in Section 18.43.060 as it relates to licensed bed and breakfast inns, no owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the Short-Term-Rental tenant.

5.7. The applicant shall state in the application the number of on-site parking A minimum of one on-site space shall be provided for each room rented. Guestspaces available to tenants, but in no case shall it be less than two on-site spaces. ShortTerm-Rental tenant parking spaces shall be within the primary driveway or other on-site location. No tenant parking in excess of this number of on-site parking spaces is permitted. No tenant is permitted to park on the street. External changes to a property such as converting significant areas of front yard landscape for purposes of meeting parking requirements is not allowed.

8. All required on-site parking spaces (including garage parking if identified at time of approval) shall be accessible and available to Short-Term-Rental tenants at all times during the rental periods.

6.9. Short-Term Rentals shall meet all applicable building, health, fire and related safety codes at all times, including provision of working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.

7.10. The ownerapplicant shall post emergency evacuation instructions and "house policies" within each guestShort-Term-Rental tenant bedroom. The house policies shall be included in the rental agreement, and shall be enforced by the ownerapplicant. At a minimum, the house policies should:
a. Reinforce the City of Redding’s Noise Standards (RMC Section 18.40.100) by establishing outdoor "quiet hours" between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to minimize disturbance to neighboring residences. Outdoor activities are prohibited during “quiet hours.”
b. Require that guestShort-Term-Rental tenant vehicles be parked on the premises, not the street in compliance with this Section.

8.11. The property shall not be used to host non-ownerapplicant related weddings, parties, and other similar events.

9.12. On-site advertising signs or other displays indicating that the residence is being utilized as a short term rental, isShort-Term Rental are prohibited.

13. No person shall advertise a Short-Term Rental on any media platform when such advertisement or notice contains an inaccurate or misleading statement of the requirements of, or indicate amenities not allowed by, the Redding Municipal Code including the number of parking spaces.

14. All advertisements shall include the number of permissible parking spaces.

Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

10.15. A City business license shall be obtained and transient occupancy taxes paid in accordance with Chapter 4.12 as required. All advertising for any short-term rentalShort-Term Rental shall include the City of Redding transient occupancy tax number and the City of Redding business license number assigned to the ownerapplicant. With submittal of transient occupancy taxes, the operatorapplicant shall also submit a statement indicating the number of guestShort-Term-Rental tenant stays, and the number of guestsShort-Term-Rental tenants for the reporting period.

11.16. The permit is not transferrable to a subsequent property owner or to another property.

12.17. This ordinance shall not be construed as waiving or otherwise impacting the rights and obligations of any individual, group, or the members of any homeowner’s association, as defined, to comply with or enforce CC&R’s, and no permit shall be issued when it is demonstrated by substantial evidence that issuance of a permit will be in contradiction to any recorded CC&R’s or other record providing record notice of a restriction on the use of the property.

F. General Requirements - Vacation Rentals.

1. With the exception of items 1 through 46 listed in Section 18.43.180(E) above, the General Requirements provisions for Hosted Homestays shall apply to Vacation Rentals.

2. The following additional provisions shall also be applicable to Vacation Rentals which may be supplemented by requirements established by the Director with approval of the required Site Development Permit as necessary to maintain compatibility of the use with the surrounding properties. a. A Vacation Rental shall not be permitted on properties as follows:

1. Containing an Accessory Dwelling Unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020, in compliance with Government Code Section 65852.2, as may be amended from time to time; or

2. Within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing permitted Vacation Rental except that, at the discretion of the Director or appellate body as the case may be, within a three hundred (300) foot radius of an existing Vacation Rental when there is a buffer such as a major arterial, rail right-of-way, flood control channel or stream corridor between the Vacation Rental units.
b. The total number of Vacation Rentals in the City shall not exceed four hundred (400) rentals at any one time.

Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) c. The owner shall be the applicant and shall be a “natural person,” trustee of a living trust, or limited liability company thereby excluding all other legal entities which protect against, in whole or in part, the liability of its members or shareholders.
a.d. A Vacation Rental shall not be rented to multiple separate parties concurrently unless the owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) is residing on the premises during the rental period, in which case the vacation rental shall be limited to two unrelated parties.
b.e. The owner/applicant shall keep on file with the cityCity the name, telephone number, and email address of a local contact person who shall be responsible for responding to questions or concerns regarding the operation of the vacation rental.Vacation Rental. This information shall be posted in a conspicuous location within the vacation rentalVacation Rental dwelling.

The local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours a day to accept telephone calls and respond physically to the vacation rentalVacation Rental within sixtyforty-five (45) minutes, if necessary. The name and contact information of the local contact person will be made available to the public. The contact information shall be kept current at all times. c. Depending of the physical nature of the property and surrounding properties, the director may allow, with approval of the site development permit, on-street guest parking.
f. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) persons per rented room.
g. The maximum number of persons on the property at any time shall be limited to sixteen (16) persons.
h. Prior to issuance of a permit, a physical inspection of the dwelling unit and property shall be conducted by City staff.
i. Each operator shall maintain a log of each Short-Term-Rental tenant’s vehicle(s). The log shall minimally consist of the rental period, the license plate, make, model, and color for each vehicle. The log shall be made available at any time upon request by the City.
j. The requirements listed in Subdivisions E(7), E(8), E(14), and F(2)(a)(2) shall not apply to a Vacation Rental located within Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District. Notwithstanding Subdivision B(2), an apartment unit located in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District may be permitted as a Short-Term Rental.

Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) G. Application Required.

Where a Site Development Permit is required by this section, applicants for a short-term rental use shall apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, and shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the city council. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny and application, the director may consider such factors, including but not limited to, proximity of the property to other vacation rentals, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes, and residential care facilities, and neighborhood and site characteristics.

1. Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a Short-Term Rental use shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council and apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter

18.11 (Common Procedures), except that notices of the Vacation Rental application shall be sent to all owners of real property within six hundred (600) feet of the applicant’s property for a fifteen (15) calendar-day notification period.

2. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny any application, including an application for renewal, for a Hosted Homestay or Vacation Rental, the Director, or appellate body as the case may be, may also consider any factor pertinent to the health, safety and welfare of the immediate neighborhood or public generally including, but not limited to, ability to comply with the provisions set forth in this Section, evidence of operation in violation with this Section, complaints of neighbors, code enforcement activity, timeliness of business permit renewal, timeliness or non-payment of transient occupancy tax, proximity of the property to group homes, residential care facilities, and other neighborhood and site characteristics.

3. Appeal of any determination to approve or deny any application, including an application for renewal, shall be in accordance with Section 18.11.090.

H. Permit Renewal.

Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a short-term rental use shall apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, and shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the city council. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application, the director may consider such factors, including but not limited to, prior complaints from neighbors and code enforcement activity, timeliness of business license renewal, timeliness of Transient Occupancy Tax submittals, proximity of the property to other vacation rentals, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes, and residential care facilities, and neighborhood and site characteristics.

H. Suspension and Termination.

1. The Director, or appellate body, shall apply the criteria set forth in Section

18.43.180(G)(2) in determining whether any permit issued pursuant to this Section Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) shall be suspended or terminated. Notice shall be provided to the applicant pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 18.11.060.

2. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Vacation Rental Permit shall be in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.11.090.

3. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Hosted Homestay Permit must be made to the Planning Commission within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Director’s decision, and appeal of the Planning Commission decision to the City Council must be made within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Planning Commission’s determination. Decisions of the City Council are final, and all challenging a decision of the Director must exhaust all remedies set forth in this Section 18.43.180(H)(3) prior to bringing a challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

4. Service shall be deemed effective upon the earliest of: 1) announcement by the approving or appellate body of the decision in the presence of the appellant; 2) personal service on the appellant of a written notice of decision; or 3) deposit of a written notice of decision in the United States Mail.

I. Legal Non-Conforming Uses.

1. Continuation and abandonment of legal nonconforming uses shall be governed by Section 18.46.020. In addition to the conditions set forth therein, the following allowances are permitted:
a. A temporary hardship exemption from this Section of not more than six (6) months may be granted by the Director of Development services, or designee, if: 1) a medical condition of the permittee, spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member jeopardizes the ability of the owner to operate the Short-Term Rental; or 2) the death of a spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member of the permittee jeopardizes the ability of the permittee to operate the Short-Term Rental. b. A long-term rental exemption from this Section may be granted by the Director of Development Services, or designee, if the permittee provides proof of a long-term lease of twelve (12) months or longer prior to the expiration of the Short-Term Rental permit. This exemption may be repeated if the conditions set forth in this subsection are met. The length of an exemption shall not exceed the term of the lease.

I.J. Violations/Revocations. Enforcement and Remedies. Enforcement of the provisions of this Section may include the civil and equitable remedies as permitted by state law, the issuance of a citation and fine, or other legal remedy as provided by Chapters 1.12 through

1.15, inclusive, of the Redding Municipal Code. Upon notification by the City, any short term rentalShort-Term Rental operating in violation of the requirements of this Section Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) must terminate operations immediately. Further, a Site Development Permit issued under the authority of this Section may be revoked in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 18.11 (Common Procedures).

Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

DRAFT NEW ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.43 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) BY AMENDING SECTION 18.43.180 (SHORT TERM RENTALS),

THEREBY MAKING CHANGES TO THE STANDARDS FOR

REGULATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.43 (Standards for Specific Land Uses), Section 18.43.180 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

18.43.180 Short-Term Rentals
A. The purpose of this Section is to establish an appropriate permitting process and standards for Short-Term Rental of dwelling units throughout the City; to provide a visitor experience and accommodation as an alternative to the typical hotel, motel, and bed and breakfast accommodations customarily permitted in the City; to minimize potential negative secondary effects of Short-Term Rental use on surrounding residential neighborhoods; to retain the character of the neighborhoods in which any such use occurs; and ensure the payment of required transient occupancy taxes.

B. Types of Short-Term Rentals. For purposes of this Section, the following Short-Term Rental facilities are established:

1. Hosted Homestay. An owner-occupied “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section

18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, with more than one habitable room, where, for compensation, individual overnight room accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days.

2. Vacation Rental. An entire “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, overnight accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty (30) days and the owner may or may not reside within the dwelling unit for the term of the rental.

C. Short-Term Rental Permit Requirements. No person shall use, advertise, or market for use, any dwelling unit on any parcel in any zoning district for Short-Term Rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The following approval process is established:

Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

1. Hosted Homestay: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Zoning Clearance from the Director and providing an affidavit certifying that the owner understands, agrees to, and is in compliance with the requirements of this Section. Applicants may be required to provide a site plan or other information determined necessary by the Director to determine compliance with this Section and shall pay an application fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council. Permits for Hosted Homestays shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

2. Vacation Rental: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Site Development Permit issued by the Director in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures and Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits of this Code, except that Site Development Permits for Vacation Rentals shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

D. Districts in Which Permitted. The regulations of this chapter apply to Short-Term Rentals in all zoning districts.

E. General Requirements - Hosted Homestay.

1. No more than one dwelling unit on a lot may be used at any one time.

2. A maximum of two rooms may be available for rent at any time. A floor plan shall be submitted with the affidavit indicating the rooms for rent.

3. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two persons per rented room. Room rental shall be limited to a maximum of 180 rental days per calendar year.

4. The owner shall be the applicant, and other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being provided for rent.

5. At the time of permit renewal, the property owner shall attest they understand and agree to the Hosted Homestay requirements by signing the Hosted Homestay Affidavit available at the Development Services Department and any payment due must be remitted.

6. Except as set forth in Section 18.43.060 as it relates to licensed bed and breakfast inns, no owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the Short-Term-Rental tenant.

7. The applicant shall state in the application the number of on-site parking spaces available to tenants, but in no case shall it be less than two on-site spaces. ShortTerm-Rental tenant parking spaces shall be within the primary driveway or other Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) on-site location. No tenant parking in excess of this number of on-site parking spaces is permitted. No tenant is permitted to park on the street. External changes to a property such as converting significant areas of front yard landscape for purposes of meeting parking requirements is not allowed.

8. All required on-site parking spaces (including garage parking if identified at time of approval) shall be accessible and available to Short-Term-Rental tenants at all times during the rental periods.

9. Short-Term Rentals shall meet all applicable building, health, fire and related safety codes at all times, including provision of working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.

10. The applicant shall post emergency evacuation instructions and "house policies" within each Short-Term-Rental tenant bedroom. The house policies shall be included in the rental agreement, and shall be enforced by the applicant. At a minimum, the house policies should:
a. Reinforce the City of Redding’s Noise Standards (RMC Section 18.40.100) by establishing outdoor "quiet hours" between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to minimize disturbance to neighboring residences. Outdoor activities are prohibited during “quiet hours.”
b. Require that Short-Term-Rental tenant vehicles be parked on the premises, not the street in compliance with this Section.

11. The property shall not be used to host non-applicant related weddings, parties, and other similar events.

12. On-site advertising signs or other displays indicating that the residence is being utilized as a Short-Term Rental are prohibited.

13. No person shall advertise a Short-Term Rental on any media platform when such advertisement or notice contains an inaccurate or misleading statement of the requirements of, or indicate amenities not allowed by the Redding Municipal Code including the number of parking spaces.

14. All advertisements shall include the number of permissible parking spaces.

15. A City business license shall be obtained and transient occupancy taxes paid in accordance with Chapter 4.12 as required. All advertising for any Short-Term Rental shall include the City of Redding transient occupancy tax number and the City of Redding business license number assigned to the applicant. With submittal of transient occupancy taxes, the applicant shall also submit a statement indicating the number of Short-Term-Rental tenant stays, and the number of Short-TermRental tenants for the reporting period.

Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

16. The permit is not transferrable to a subsequent property owner or to another property.

17. This ordinance shall not be construed as waiving or otherwise impacting the rights and obligations of any individual, group, or the members of any homeowner’s association, as defined, to comply with or enforce CC&R’s and no permit shall be issued when it is demonstrated by substantial evidence that issuance of a permit will be in contradiction to any recorded CC&R’s or other record providing record notice of a restriction on the use of the property.

F. General Requirements - Vacation Rentals.

1. With the exception of items 1 through 46 listed in Section 18.43.180(E) above, the General Requirements provisions for Hosted Homestays shall apply to Vacation Rentals.

2. The following additional provisions shall also be applicable to Vacation Rentals which may be supplemented by requirements established by the Director with approval of the required Site Development Permit as necessary to maintain compatibility of the use with the surrounding properties. a. A Vacation Rental shall not be permitted on properties as follows:

1. Containing an Accessory Dwelling Unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020 in compliance with Government Code Section 65852.2, as may be amended from time to time; or

2. Within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing permitted Vacation Rental except that, at the discretion of the Director or appellate body as the case may be, within a three hundred (300) foot radius of an existing Vacation Rental when there is a buffer such as a major arterial, rail right-of-way, flood control channel or stream corridor between the Vacation Rental units.
b. The total number of Vacation Rentals in the City shall not exceed four hundred (400) rentals at any one time.
c. The owner shall be the applicant and shall be a “natural person,” trustee of a living trust, or limited liability company thereby excluding all other legal entities which protect against, in whole or in part, the liability of its members or shareholders.
d. A Vacation Rental shall not be rented to multiple separate parties concurrently.

Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) e. The applicant shall keep on file with the City the name, telephone number, and email address of a local contact person who shall be responsible for responding to questions or concerns regarding the operation of the Vacation Rental. This information shall be posted in a conspicuous location within the Vacation Rental dwelling. The local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours a day to accept telephone calls and respond physically to the Vacation Rental within forty-five (45) minutes, if necessary. The name and contact information of the local contact person will be made available to the public. The contact information shall be kept current at all times. f. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) persons per rented room.
g. The maximum number of persons on the property at any time shall be limited to sixteen (16) persons.
h. Prior to issuance of a permit, a physical inspection of the dwelling unit and property shall be conducted by City staff.
i. Each operator shall maintain a log of each Short-Term-Rental tenant’s vehicle(s). The log shall minimally consist of the rental period, the license plate, make, model, and color for each vehicle. The log shall be made available at any time upon request by the City.
j. The requirements listed in Subdivisions E(7), E(8), E(14), and F(2)(a)(2) shall not apply to a Vacation Rental located within Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District. Notwithstanding Subdivision B(2), an apartment unit located in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Core District may be permitted as a Short-Term Rental.

G. Application Required.

1. Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a Short-Term Rental use shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council and apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter

18.11 (Common Procedures), except that notices of the Vacation Rental application shall be sent to all owners of real property within six hundred (600) feet of the applicant’s property for a fifteen (15) calendar-day notification period.

2. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny any application, including an application for renewal, for a Hosted Homestay or Vacation Rental, the Director, or appellate body as the case may be, may also consider any factor pertinent to the health, safety and welfare of the immediate neighborhood or public generally including, but not limited to, ability to comply with the provisions set forth in this Section, evidence of operation in violation with this Section, complaints of neighbors, code enforcement activity, timeliness of Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) business permit renewal, timeliness or non-payment of transient occupancy tax, proximity of the property to group homes, residential care facilities, and other neighborhood and site characteristics.

3. Appeal of any determination to approve or deny any application, including an application for renewal, shall be in accordance with Section 18.11.090.

H. Suspension and Termination.

1. The Director, or appellate body, shall apply the criteria set forth in Section

18.43.180(G)(2) in determining whether any permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be suspended or terminated. Notice shall be provided to the applicant pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 18.11.060.

2. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Vacation Rental Permit shall be in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.11.090.

3. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Hosted Homestay Permit must be made to the Planning Commission within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Director’s decision, and appeal of the Planning Commission decision to the City Council must be made within ten (10) calendar days of service of the Planning Commission’s determination. Decisions of the City Council are final, and all challenging a decision of the Director must exhaust all remedies set forth in this Section 18.43.180(H)(3) prior to bringing a challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

4. Service shall be deemed effective upon the earliest of: 1) announcement by the approving or appellate body of the decision in the presence of the appellant; 2) personal service on the appellant of a written notice of decision; or 3) deposit of a written notice of decision in the United States Mail.

I. Legal Non-Conforming Uses

1. Continuation and abandonment of legal nonconforming uses shall be governed by Section 18.46.020. In addition to the conditions set forth therein, the following allowances are permitted:
a. A temporary hardship exemption from this Section of not more than six (6) months may be granted by the Director of Development services, or designee, if: 1) a medical condition of the permittee, spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member jeopardizes the ability of the owner to operate the Short-Term Rental; or 2) the death of a spouse, domestic partner, or immediate family member of the permittee jeopardizes the ability of the permittee to operate the Short-Term Rental. b. A long-term rental exemption from this Section may be granted by the Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Director of Development Services, or designee, if the permittee provides proof of a long-term lease of twelve (12) months or longer prior to the expiration of the Short-Term Rental permit. This exemption may be repeated if the conditions set forth in this subsection are met. The length of an exemption shall not exceed the term of the lease.

J. Enforcement and Remedies. Enforcement of the provisions of this Section include the civil and equitable remedies as permitted by state law, the issuance of a citation and fine, or other legal remedy as provided by Chapter 1.12 through 1.15, inclusive, of the Redding Municipal Code. Upon notification by the City, any Short-Term Rental operating in violation of the requirements of this Section must terminate operations immediately.

Further, a Site Development Permit issued under the authority of this Section may be revoked in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 18.11 (Common Procedures).

Section 2. The Council hereby finds and determines that the enactment of this Ordinance is exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”) because it has no potential to result in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the “common sense” exemption (14 CCR 15061(b)(3)), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision will remain in effect to the extent permitted by law.

Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) calendar days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 2nd day of May, 2023, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the ____ day of _______, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_______________________________ ____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
DATE ATTESTED: May ____, 2023
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing, and upon conclusion, recommend that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Title 18, Zoning, of the Redding Municipal Code as it pertains to short term rentals.

Description
Over the past year, the City Council (Council) has held discussions regarding the City of Redding’s (City) Short-Term Rental Ordinance (Ordinance). Below is a summary of these discussions:

July 19, 2022 – The Council received a status update regarding implementation of the City’s Short-Term Rental Ordinance. Public comment received at the meeting was mixed, with speakers both supporting and opposing tighter regulations for short-term rentals. Following this meeting, Council and staff continued to receive community feedback regarding short-term rentals, specifically vacation rentals.

August 2, 2022 – Council directed City Attorney to return with an Interim Urgency Ordinance which would have the effect of prohibiting the submission and receipt of applications for vacation rentals.

August 16, 2022 – Council considered but ultimately did not approve, the Interim Urgency Ordinance; however, the consensus of Council was the Ordinance should be reviewed for updates and additional regulations. Council directed staff to return to Council with recommendations for potential MEETING DATE: January 10, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(b)1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by the City of Redding, to consider an amendment to the City’s Zoning Ordinance pertaining to modifications to the shortterm rental requirements (Section 18.43.180).

Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Packet Pg. 258 Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission January 6, 2023
Re: 4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 2

amendments to the Ordinance for consideration and direction at a future Council meeting.

October 18, 2022 – Council reviewed staff’s suggested modifications to the Ordinance and provided direction to staff to craft a revised Ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission and subsequently to Council for consideration.

The proposed text amendments are summarized below:

Density
(1) Limit the number of rentals within a geographic area based on street and neighborhood. a. 1,000 feet minimum separation on the same street
b. 500 feet minimum separation on different streets
c. Reduction down to 300 feet separation may be considered when there are natural buffers such as major arterials, rivers, and creeks.

Vacation Rental Criteria
(2) Location – Prohibit on properties containing an accessory dwelling unit. (3) Total Number of Rentals – The total number of permitted Rentals shall not exceed 400 rentals at any one time.
(4) Public Hearing – Require a Planning Commission hearing when one or more party within the notification area objects.
(5) Owner Criteria
a. Must be a “natural person.”
b. A Shasta County resident
(6) Permit Criteria
a. One person shall not have financial interest in more than two vacation rentals within the City of Redding at any one time.
b. Require site manager information to be kept current at all times. c. Revise the maximum occupants per bedroom from two adults to two persons. d. Limit the occupancy to 16 persons.
e. Provide one additional parking space in addition to the one per bedroom already required.
f. Require an inspection by City staff prior to issuance of the permit. g. Require a floor plan
h. Require a log of vehicle information including make, model, color and license plates of all tenant vehicles.
i. Reduce site manager’s response time from 60 minutes to 45 minutes. j. All required parking spaces shall remain accessible and available to tenants at all times during the rental periods.
k. Dwelling unit may not contain more than five bedrooms. l. Notification of application shall be sent to property owners within 1,000 feet of the applicant’s property.
m. The appeal period of a decision on vacation rental applications is 15 days.

Packet Pg. 259 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission January 6, 2023
Re: 4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 3

Hosted Homestay Criteria
(7) Require floor plan to document rooms to be rented
(8) Require affidavit to be signed on an annual basis
(9) Require one additional parking space in addition to the one per bedroom already ready.

Suspension and Termination
(10) Language regarding suspension and termination has been added.

Legal Non-Conforming Uses and Amortization of Non-Conforming Uses (11) Language has been added to address grandfathering including addressing all existing vacation rentals not in compliance with the density regulations, which will be granted continual rights to operate for three years from the effective date of the new regulations and thereafter entered into a lottery to apply for the necessary permit.

Issue
Should the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to the short term regulations of the Redding Municipal Code? Alternatives
The Planning Commission has the option of recommending that the City Council adopt or not adopt the proposed amendments or directing staff to modify the proposed amendments prior to consideration by the Council. Should changes be requested, the Commission should provide clear direction to staff.

Environmental Determination
The passage of the proposed ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Planning Commission Authority
Section 18.10.030 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the Planning Commission to make recommendations to the City Council on amendments to Title 18.

Conclusion
Adoption of the proposed amendments to the short-term regulations of the Redding Municipal Code would enhance the existing and clarify the intent of the existing regulations and provide additional flexibility in the administration of the Code. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission recommend adoption of the proposed amendments by the Council.

Attachments
Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance
Packet Pg. 260 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) Report to Redding Planning Commission January 6, 2023
Re: 4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding Page 4

Draft New Zoning Ordinance
Packet Pg. 261 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

STRIKEOUT ORDINANCE
OLD LANGUAGE: STRUCK OUT
NEW LANGUAGE: UNDERLINE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.43 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) BY AMENDING SECTION 18.43.180 (SHORT TERM RENTALS)

THEREBY UPDATING THE ZONING CODE

18.43.180 Short-Term Rentals
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish an appropriate permitting process and standards for shortShort-term Term rental Rental of single-family dwellings units throughout the city and dwelling units located in the Downtown Redding Specific Plan area; to provide a visitor experience and accommodation as an alternative to the typical hotel, motel, and bed and breakfast accommodations customarily permitted in the city; to minimize potential negative secondary effects of shortShort-term Term rental Rental use on surrounding residential neighborhoods; to retain the character of the neighborhoods in which any such use occurs; and ensure the payment of required transient occupancy taxes.

A.B. Types of Short-Term Rentals. For purposes of this Section, the following Short-Term Rental facilities are established:

1. Hosted Homestay. An owner owner-occupied single-family dwelling unit “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, with more than one habitable room, where, for compensation, individual overnight room accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty days.

2. Vacation Rental. An entire dwelling unit “Dwelling Unit,” as defined by Section

18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for compensation, overnight accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty days and the owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) may or may not reside within the dwelling unit for the term of the rental.

B.C. Short-Term Rental Permit Requirements. No person shall use, advertise, or market for use, any dwelling unit on any parcel in any zoning district for shortShort-term Term rental Rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The provisions of this Section apply to all existing and future short term rentals as defined in this Section. Existing short term rental facilities shall either apply for, or obtain authority to operate, within sixty days of the effective date of this ordinance. Short-term rentals located within the Downtown Redding Specific Plan area shall follow the process set forth for Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) hosted homestays defined in subsection (C)(1) of this Section. The following approval process is established:

1. Hosted Homestay: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Zoning Clearance from the Director and providing an affidavit certifying that the owner understands, and agrees to, and is in compliance with the requirements of this Section.

Applicants may be required to provide a site plan or other information determined necessary by the Director to determine compliance with this Section and shall pay an application fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council. Permits for Hosted Homestays shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

2. Vacation Rental: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Site Development Permit issued by the Director in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures and Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits of this Code, except that site Site development Development permits Permits for Vacation Rentals shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject need to be renewed annually a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

C.D. Districts in Which Permitted. The regulations of this chapter apply to shortShort-term Term rentals Rentals in all zoning districts.

D.E. General Requirements - Hosted Homestay.

1. No more than one dwelling unit on a lot may be used at any one time for short term rental purposes.

2. A maximum of two rooms may be available for rent at any time. A floor plan shall be submitted with the affidavit indicating the rooms for rent.

3. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two adults persons per rented room. Room rental shall be limited to a maximum of 180 rental days per calendar year.

4. The property owner shall be the applicant, and other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being provided for rent.

5. At the time of permit renewal, the property owner shall attest they understand and agree to the Hosted Homestay requirements by signing the Hosted Homestay Affidavit available at the Development Services Department and any payment due must be remitted.

4.6. Except as set forth in Section 18.43.060 as it relates to licensed bed and breakfast inns, no owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the Short-Term-Rental tenant.

7. A mMinimum requiredof one on-site parking space shall be providedinclude one space for each room rented plus one additional parking space. Guest Short-Term-Rental tenant Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) parking spaces shall be within the primary driveway or other on-site location. External changes to a property such as converting significant areas of front yard landscape for purposes of meeting parking requirements is not allowed.

5.8. All required on-site parking spaces (including garage parking if identified at time of approval) shall be accessible and available to Short-Term-Rental tenants at all times during the rental periods.

6.9. Short-term Term rentals Rentals shall meet all applicable building, health, fire and related safety codes at all times, including provision of working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.

7.10. The owner applicant shall post emergency evacuation instructions and "house policies" within each guest Short-Term-Rental tenant bedroom. The house policies shall be included in the rental agreement, and shall be enforced by the ownerapplicant. At a minimum, the house policies should:
a. Reinforce the City of Redding’s Noise Standards (RMC Section 18.40.100) by establishing outdoor "quiet hours" between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to minimize disturbance to neighboring residences. Outdoor activities are prohibited during “quiet hours.”
b. Require that guest Short-Term-Rental tenant vehicles be parked on the premises, not the street in compliance with this Section.

8.11. The property shall not be used to host non-owner applicant related weddings, parties, and other similar events.

12. On-site advertising signs or other displays indicating that the residence is being utilized as a short Short-term Term rentalRental, is are prohibited.

9.13. No person shall advertise a Short-Term Rental on any media platform when such advertisement or notice contains an inaccurate or misleading statement of the requirements of, or indicate amenities not allowed by the Redding Municipal Code.

10.14. A City business license shall be obtained and transient occupancy taxes paid in accordance with Chapter 4.12 as required. All advertising for any shortShort-term Term rental Rental shall include the City of Redding transient occupancy tax number and the City of Redding business license number assigned to the owner-applicant. With submittal of transient occupancy taxes, the operator applicant shall also submit a statement indicating the number of guest Short-Term-Rental tenant stays, and the number of guests Short-Term-Rental tenants for the reporting period.

11.15. The permit is not transferrable to a subsequent property owner or to another property.

12.16. This ordinance shall not be construed as waiving or otherwise impacting the rights and Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) obligations of any individual, group, or the members of any homeowner’s association, as defined, to comply with or enforce CC&R’s and no permit shall be issued when it is demonstrated by substantial evidence that issuance of a permit will be in contradiction to any recorded CC&R’s or other record providing record notice of a restriction on the use of the property.

A.F. General Requirements - Vacation Rentals.

13.1. With the exception of items 1 through 4 6 listed in Section 18.43.180(E) above, the General Requirements provisions for Hosted Homestays shall apply to Vacation Rentals.

14.2. The following additional provisions shall also be applicable to Vacation Rentals which may be supplemented by requirements established by the Director with approval of the required Site Development Permit as necessary to maintain compatibility of the use with the surrounding properties.
a. A Vacation Rental shall not be permitted on properties as follows:

1. Containing an Accessory Dwelling Unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020 in compliance with State Law governing Accessory Dwelling Units (Government Code Section 65852.2); or

2. Within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing Vacation Rental on the same street; or

3. Within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing permitted Vacation Rental; or

4. At the discretion of the Director and notwithstanding subparagraph (iii), within a three hundred (300) foot radius of an existing Vacation Rental when there is a natural buffer such as a major arterial, rail right-of-way, flood control channel or stream corridor between the Vacation Rental units. b. The total number of Vacation Rentals in the City shall not exceed four hundred (400) rentals at any one time.
c. The owner shall be the applicant and shall be as follows:

1. A “natural person” or trustee of a living trust, thereby excluding all limited liability companies, partnerships, corporations or other entities which protect against, in whole or in part, the liability of its members; and

2. A Shasta County resident, as verified by a California Driver License or Identification Card issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. a.d. A Vacation Rental shall not be rented to multiple separate parties concurrently unless the owner (or the primary occupant with the written permission of the owner) Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) is residing on the premises during the rental period, in which case the vacation rental shall be limited to two unrelated parties.
e. The owner/applicant shall keep on file with the city City the name, telephone number, and email address of a local contact person who shall be responsible for responding to questions or concerns regarding the operation of the vacation Vacation rentalRental. This information shall be posted in a conspicuous location within the vacation Vacation rental Rental dwelling. The local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours a day to accept telephone calls and respond physically to the vacation Vacation rental Rental within sixty forty-five minutes, if necessary. The name and contact information of the local contact person will be made available to the public. The contact information shall be kept current at all times.
f. No person shall have a financial interest in more than two (2) Vacation Rentals within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Redding at any one (1) time.

1. “Financial Interest” is defined as having an ownership interest in any entity which has a property interest in the fee title of a property hosting a Vacation Rental; having an ownership interest in or right to receive monetary compensation of any kind from a Vacation Rental; having a right to receive income of any kind resulting from a loan (i.e., repayment of principal or interest) or other instrument applicable to a property hosting a Vacation Rental; or having any right to derive monetary compensation from the provision of services to an owner, or said owners agent, of a Vacation Rental.
g. A Vacation Rental shall not be operated from a dwelling unit containing more than five (5) bedrooms. A floor plan shall be submitted with the permit application identifying the bedrooms of the single-family residence. To qualify as a bedroom, the room shall contain a built-in closet.
h. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two persons per rented room. i. The maximum number of persons on the property at any time shall be limited to sixteen (16) persons.
j. Prior to issuance of a permit, a physical inspection of the dwelling unit and property shall be conducted by City staff.
b.k. Each operator shall maintain a log of each Short-Term-Rental tenant’s vehicle(s).

The log shall minimally consist of the rental period, the license plate, make, model, and color for each vehicle. The log shall be made available at any time upon request by the City.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) c. Depending of the physical nature of the property and surrounding properties, the Director may allow, with approval of the site development permit, on-street guest parking.

F.G. Application Required.

1. Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a shortShortterm Term rental Rental use shall apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, and shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council and apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, except as follow. :
a. Notices of the Vacation Rental application shall be sent to all owners of real property within one thousand (1,000) feet of the applicant’s property for a fifteen (15) day notification period. Should one or more owner(s) of real property within the notification area object in writing to the approval of the Vacation Rental or appeal the approval by the Director within the fifteen (15) day appeal period, the application shall be brought forth before the Planning Commission for consideration.

2. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny and any application, including an application for renewal, for a Hosted Homestay or Vacation Rental, the Director, or appellate body as the case may be, may consider such factors, including, but not limited to, ability to comply with the provisions set forth in this Section, evidence of operation in violation with this Section, complaints of neighbors, code enforcement activity, timeliness of business permit renewal, timeliness or non-payment of transient occupancy tax, proximity of the property to other vacation rentals, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes, and residential care facilities, and other neighborhood and site characteristics.

G.H. Permit RenewalSuspension and Termination.

1. The Director, or appellate body, shall apply the criteria set forth in Section 18.43.180(G)(2) in determining whether any permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be suspended or terminated. Notice shall be provided to the applicant pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 18.11.060.

2. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Vacation Rental Permit shall be in accordance with Section 18.11.090.

3. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Hosted Homestay Permit shall be to the Planning Commission within ten days of service of the Director’s decision, and finally to the City Council within ten days of service of the Planning Commission’s determination. Decisions of the City Council are final, and all challenging a decision of the Director must exhaust all remedies set forth in this Section 18.43.180(H)(3) prior to bringing a challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

4. Service shall be determined to be effective upon personal delivery or deposit in the United States mail postage prepaid, whichever is earlier.

Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a short-term rental use shall apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, and shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application, the Director may consider such factors, including but not limited to, prior complaints from neighbors and code enforcement activity, timeliness of business license renewal, timeliness of Transient Occupancy Tax submittals, proximity of the property to other vacation rentals, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes, and residential care facilities, and neighborhood and site characteristics.

I. Legal Non-Conforming Uses and Amortization of Non-Conforming Uses.

1. No permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be considered as creating a vested property right to a renewal of said permit, and no condition of economic or personal investment or expectation of the same in an existing Vacation Rental or Hosted Homestay shall create any such vested property right.

2. Except as provided in Section 18.43.180(I)(3), no permit shall be issued which would cause a violation of any provision of this Section.

3. Those possessing a current, valid permit for a Vacation Rental issued pursuant to this Section which is effective as April 1, 2023, are excused from compliance with the requirements of Sections 18.43.180(E)(7)-(8), 18.43.180(F)(2)(a)-(b), and

18.43.180(F)(2)(f). Notwithstanding the preceding, no permit shall be renewed as of April 1, 2026, without demonstration of compliance with all the terms and conditions of this Section.

4. As of April 1, 2026, or as soon thereafter as may feasibly be accomplished, all operations in noncompliance with the site-distance and/or density requirements set forth in Section

18.43.180(F)(2)(a)-(b), shall be entered into a lottery or lotteries to determine which permit(s) will not be renewed due to non-compliance with the requirements set forth in Section 18.43.180(F)(2)(a)-(b). Those selected by lottery for continued operation of a Vacation Rental may, assuming compliance with all the provisions of this Section, continue in operation thereafter and apply for renewal of said permit thereafter without necessity of undergoing further random processes of selection. Those not selected for continued operation of a Vacation Rental may continue operation but only until such time as the permit issued has lapsed due to expiration. Thereafter, the use shall cease.

5. Exclusion from continued operation pursuant to Section 18.43.180(I)(4) shall not be construed as barring subsequent application.

6. As of April 1, 2026, and only as it relates to the density requirement set forth in Section

18.43.180(F)(2)(b), if the total number of Vacation Rentals falls below the number of four Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) hundred (400), applications will be received and processed on a first come-first served basis. Thereafter, to remain eligible for consideration of an application, the applicant must reapply prior to the expiration of one (1) year, and, assuming a timely reapplication, the date of application for purposes of receipt on a first come-first served basis shall be the date of the initial application.

H.J. Violations/RevocationsEnforcement and Remedies.

Enforcement of the provisions of this Section may include the civil and equitable remedies as permitted by state law, the issuance of a citation and fine, or other legal remedy as provided by Chapter 1.12 of the Redding Municipal Code. Upon notification by the City, any short Short-term Term rental Rental operating in violation of the requirements of this Section must terminate operations immediately. Further, a Site Development Permit issued under the authority of this Section may be revoked in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures.

Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Draft Strikeout Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

DRAFT NEW ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.43 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) BY AMENDING SECTION 18.43.180 (SHORT TERM RENTALS)

THEREBY UPDATING THE ZONING CODE
WHEREAS, the City of Redding Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to proposed amendments to Redding Municipal Code Section 18.43.180 on January 10, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding held a duly noticed public hearing on February , 2023, whereby it considered the oral and written report of City staff, and public comment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds compliance with State law will be attained through the adoption of the amended regulations relating to short term rentals;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.43 (Standards for Specific Land Uses) are hereby amended to read as follows:

18.43.180 Short-Term Rentals
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish an appropriate permitting process and standards for Short-Term Rental of dwelling units throughout the city; to provide a visitor experience and accommodation as an alternative to the typical hotel, motel, and bed and breakfast accommodations customarily permitted in the city; to minimize potential negative secondary effects of Short-Term Rental use on surrounding residential neighborhoods; to retain the character of the neighborhoods in which any such use occurs; and ensure the payment of required transient occupancy taxes.

B. Types of Short-Term Rentals. For purposes of this Section, the following Short-Term Rental facilities are established:

1. Hosted Homestay. An owner-occupied “Dwelling Unit”, as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, with more than one habitable room, where, for compensation, individual overnight room accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty days.

2. Vacation Rental. An entire “Dwelling Unit”, as defined by Section 18.61.020 under “Residential Structure Types” and excluding apartment units and duplexes, where, for Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) compensation, overnight accommodations are provided for a period of less than thirty days and the owner may or may not reside within the dwelling unit for the term of the rental.

C. Short-Term Rental Permit Requirements. No person shall use, advertise, or market for use, any dwelling unit on any parcel in any zoning district for Short-Term Rental purposes without first obtaining approval as required by this Section. The following approval process is established:

1. Hosted Homestay: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Zoning Clearance from the Director and providing an affidavit certifying that the owner understands, agrees to, and is in compliance with the requirements of this Section.

Applicants may be required to provide a site plan or other information determined necessary by the Director to determine compliance with this Section and shall pay an application fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council. Permits for Hosted Homestays shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

2. Vacation Rental: This use is permitted within all zoning districts subject to obtaining a Site Development Permit issued by the Director in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures and Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits of this Code, except that Site Development Permits for Vacation Rentals shall expire twelve (12) months from issuance and are subject to a requirement for renewal in accordance with this Section.

D. Districts in Which Permitted. The regulations of this chapter apply to Short-Term Rentals in all zoning districts.

E. General Requirements - Hosted Homestay.

1. No more than one dwelling unit on a lot may be used at any one time.

2. A maximum of two rooms may be available for rent at any time. A floor plan shall be submitted with the affidavit indicating the rooms for rent.

3. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two persons per rented room. Room rental shall be limited to a maximum of 180 rental days per calendar year.

4. The owner shall be the applicant, and other than for purposes of daily routines, the applicant must occupy the residence at all times when rooms are being provided for rent.

5. At the time of permit renewal, the property owner shall attest they understand and agree to the Hosted Homestay requirements by signing the Hosted Homestay Affidavit available at the Development Services Department and any payment due must be remitted.

6. Except as set forth in Section 18.43.060 as it relates to licensed bed and breakfast inns, no owner shall cook, prepare or serve for consumption food of any kind for consumption by the Short-Term-Rental tenant.

7. Minimum required on-site parking space shall include one space for each room rented plus Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) one additional parking space. Short-Term-Rental tenant parking spaces shall be within the primary driveway or other on-site location. External changes to a property such as converting significant areas of front yard landscape for purposes of meeting parking requirements is not allowed.

8. All required on-site parking spaces (including garage parking if identified at time of approval) shall be accessible and available to Short-Term-Rental tenants at all times during the rental periods.

9. Short-Term Rentals shall meet all applicable building, health, fire and related safety codes at all times, including provision of working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.

10. The applicant shall post emergency evacuation instructions and "house policies" within each Short-Term-Rental tenant bedroom. The house policies shall be included in the rental agreement, and shall be enforced by the applicant. At a minimum, the house policies should:
a. Reinforce the City of Redding’s Noise Standards (RMC Section 18.40.100) by establishing outdoor "quiet hours" between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to minimize disturbance to neighboring residences. Outdoor activities are prohibited during “quiet hours.”
b. Require that Short-Term-Rental tenant vehicles be parked on the premises, not the street in compliance with this Section.

11. The property shall not be used to host non-applicant related weddings, parties, and other similar events.

12. On-site advertising signs or other displays indicating that the residence is being utilized as a Short-Term Rental, are prohibited.

13. No person shall advertise a Short-Term Rental on any media platform when such advertisement or notice contains an inaccurate or misleading statement of the requirements of, or indicate amenities not allowed by the Redding Municipal Code.

14. A City business license shall be obtained and transient occupancy taxes paid in accordance with Chapter 4.12 as required. All advertising for any Short-Term Rental shall include the City of Redding transient occupancy tax number and the City of Redding business license number assigned to the applicant. With submittal of transient occupancy taxes, the applicant shall also submit a statement indicating the number of Short-Term-Rental tenant stays, and the number of Short-Term-Rental tenants for the reporting period.

15. The permit is not transferrable to a subsequent property owner or to another property.

16. This ordinance shall not be construed as waiving or otherwise impacting the rights and obligations of any individual, group, or the members of any homeowner’s association, as defined, to comply with or enforce CC&R’s and no permit shall be issued when it is demonstrated by substantial evidence that issuance of a permit will be in contradiction to any recorded CC&R’s or other record providing record notice of a restriction on the use of the property.

Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) F. General Requirements - Vacation Rentals.

1. With the exception of items 1 through 6 listed in Section 18.43.180(E) above, the General Requirements provisions for Hosted Homestays shall apply to Vacation Rentals.

2. The following additional provisions shall also be applicable to Vacation Rentals which may be supplemented by requirements established by the Director with approval of the required Site Development Permit as necessary to maintain compatibility of the use with the surrounding properties.
a. A Vacation Rental shall not be permitted on properties as follows:

1. Containing an Accessory Dwelling Unit with a building permit application submitted on or after January 1, 2020 in compliance with State Law governing Accessory Dwelling Units (Government Code Section 65852.2); or

2. Within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing Vacation Rental on the same street; or

3. Within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing permitted Vacation Rental; or

4. At the discretion of the Director and notwithstanding subparagraph (iii), within a three hundred (300) foot radius of an existing Vacation Rental when there is a natural buffer such as a major arterial, rail right-of-way, flood control channel or stream corridor between the Vacation Rental units. b. The total number of Vacation Rentals in the City shall not exceed four hundred (400) rentals at any one time.
c. The owner shall be the applicant and shall be as follows:

1. A “natural person” or trustee of a living trust, thereby excluding all limited liability companies, partnerships, corporations or other entities which protect against, in whole or in part, the liability of its members; and

2. A Shasta County resident, as verified by a California Driver License or Identification Card issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. d. A Vacation Rental shall not be rented to multiple separate parties concurrently. e. The applicant shall keep on file with the City the name, telephone number, and email address of a local contact person who shall be responsible for responding to questions or concerns regarding the operation of the Vacation Rental. This information shall be posted in a conspicuous location within the Vacation Rental dwelling. The local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours a day to accept telephone calls and respond physically to the Vacation Rental within Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) forty-five minutes, if necessary. The name and contact information of the local contact person will be made available to the public. The contact information shall be kept current at all times.
f. No person shall have a financial interest in more than two (2) Vacation Rentals within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Redding at any one (1) time.

1. “Financial Interest” is defined as having an ownership interest in any entity which has a property interest in the fee title of a property hosting a Vacation Rental; having an ownership interest in or right to receive monetary compensation of any kind from a Vacation Rental; having a right to receive income of any kind resulting from a loan (i.e., repayment of principal or interest) or other instrument applicable to a property hosting a Vacation Rental; or having any right to derive monetary compensation from the provision of services to an owner, or said owners agent, of a Vacation Rental.
g. A Vacation Rental shall not be operated from a dwelling unit containing more than five (5) bedrooms. A floor plan shall be submitted with the permit application identifying the bedrooms of the single-family residence. To qualify as a bedroom, the room shall contain a built-in closet.
h. Occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of two persons per rented room. i. The maximum number of persons on the property at any time shall be limited to sixteen (16) persons.
j. Prior to issuance of a permit, a physical inspection of the dwelling unit and property shall be conducted by City staff.
k. Each operator shall maintain a log of each Short-Term-Rental tenant’s vehicle(s).

The log shall minimally consist of the rental period, the license plate, make, model, and color for each vehicle. The log shall be made available at any time upon request by the City.

G. Application Required.

1. Where a Site Development Permit is required by this Section, applicants for a Short-Term Rental use shall pay the application fee established by resolution of the City Council and apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures, except as follow:
a. Notices of the Vacation Rental application shall be sent to all owners of real property within one thousand (1,000) feet of the applicant’s property for a fifteen (15) day notification period. Should one or more owner(s) of real property within the notification area object in writing to the approval of the Vacation Rental or appeal the approval by the Director within the fifteen (15) day appeal period, the application shall be brought forth before the Planning Commission for consideration.

Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

2. In making a determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny any application, including an application for renewal, for a Hosted Homestay or Vacation Rental, the Director, or appellate body as the case may be, may consider such factors including, but not limited to, ability to comply with the provisions set forth in this Section, evidence of operation in violation with this Section, complaints of neighbors, code enforcement activity, timeliness of business permit renewal, timeliness or non-payment of transient occupancy tax, proximity of the property to group homes, residential care facilities, and other neighborhood and site characteristics.

H. Suspension and Termination.

1. The Director, or appellate body, shall apply the criteria set forth in Section 18.43.180(G)(2) in determining whether any permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be suspended or terminated. Notice shall be provided to the applicant pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 18.11.060.

2. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Vacation Rental Permit shall be in accordance with Section 18.11.090.

3. Appeal of the suspension or termination by the Director of a Hosted Homestay Permit shall be to the Planning Commission within ten days of service of the Director’s decision, and finally to the City Council within ten days of service of the Planning Commission’s determination. Decisions of the City Council are final, and all challenging a decision of the Director must exhaust all remedies set forth in this Section 18.43.180(H)(3) prior to bringing a challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

4. Service shall be determined to be effective upon personal delivery or deposit in the United States mail postage prepaid, whichever is earlier.

I. Legal Non-Conforming Uses and Amortization of Non-Conforming Uses.

1. No permit issued pursuant to this Section shall be considered as creating a vested property right to a renewal of said permit, and no condition of economic or personal investment or expectation of the same in an existing Vacation Rental or Hosted Homestay shall create any such vested property right.

2. Except as provided in Section 18.43.180(I)(3), no permit shall be issued which would cause a violation of any provision of this Section.

3. Those possessing a current, valid permit for a Vacation Rental issued pursuant to this Section which is effective as April 1, 2023, are excused from compliance with the requirements of Sections 18.43.180(E)(7)-(8), 18.43.180(F)(2)(a)-(b), and

18.43.180(F)(2)(f). Notwithstanding the preceding, no permit shall be renewed as of April 1, 2026, without demonstration of compliance with all the terms and conditions of this Section.

4. As of April 1, 2026, or as soon thereafter as may feasibly be accomplished, all operations in noncompliance with the site-distance and/or density requirements set forth in Section Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

18.43.180(F)(2)(a)-(b), shall be entered into a lottery or lotteries to determine which permit(s) will not be renewed due to non-compliance with the requirements set forth in Section 18.43.180(F)(2)(a)-(b). Those selected by lottery for continued operation of a Vacation Rental may, assuming compliance with all the provisions of this Section, continue in operation thereafter and apply for renewal of said permit thereafter without necessity of undergoing further random processes of selection. Those not selected for continued operation of a Vacation Rental may continue operation but only until such time as the permit issued has lapsed due to expiration. Thereafter, the use shall cease.

5. Exclusion from continued operation pursuant to Section 18.43.180(I)(4) shall not be construed as barring subsequent application.

6. As of April 1, 2026, and only as it relates to the density requirement set forth in Section

18.43.180(F)(2)(b), if the total number of Vacation Rentals falls below the number of four hundred (400), applications will be received and processed on a first come-first served basis. Thereafter, to remain eligible for consideration of an application, the applicant must reapply prior to the expiration of one (1) year, and, assuming a timely reapplication, the date of application for purposes of receipt on a first come-first served basis shall be the date of the initial application.

J. Enforcement and Remedies.

Enforcement of the provisions of this Section may include the civil and equitable remedies as permitted by state law, the issuance of a citation and fine, or other legal remedy as provided by Chapter 1.12 of the Redding Municipal Code. Upon notification by the City, any Short-Term Rental operating in violation of the requirements of this Section must terminate operations immediately. Further, a Site Development Permit issued under the authority of this Section may be revoked in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 18.11, Common Procedures.

Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 3. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the day of , 2023, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the _____ day of ________, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
__
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
DATE ATTESTED: February ____, 2023
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Draft New Zoning Ordinance (4(b)1-- Rezoning Application RZ-2022-02356, by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report - April 25, 2023 (6.1--Rezoning Application RZ-2023-00236, by the City of Redding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Third Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to accepting this report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The March Financial Report (attached) shows that Redding Electric Utility’s (REU’s) Net Operating Revenues for the first nine months of the fiscal year performed worse than budgeted.

Power Cost, offset by savings in System Operation and Maintenance (O&M), is the primary driver for poor performance, especially higher natural gas commodity prices. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), several unprecedented factors contributed to the higher prices: below-normal temperatures, high natural gas demand, reduced natural gas supplies, reduced interstate pipeline capacity, and low natural gas storage levels. The good news is that the return of warmer weather has helped rebalance gas supplies, and the cost of wholesale gas has dropped significantly.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.5(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.5(b)--Consider Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 278
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter Page 2 While unrestricted reserves declined by approximately $9.9 million through March, the cash reserve balance meets the Council’s Financial Management Policy requirements. In addition, it aligns with REU’s five-year financial and rate plan presented to the Council on September 20, 2022, which forecasted unrestricted reserves declining by approximately $12 million in Fiscal Year 2023.

Revenue
Billed retail revenue through March was $6,257,376 (6.6 percent) above budget, primarily due to weather. August and September were warmer than the previous four years, resulting in more energy usage. In addition, below-normal temperatures and rainy conditions in February and March led to a larger-than-expected use. Total wholesale sales were $31,160,263 (425.4 percent) above budget. Overall, operating revenue was $36,224,414 (33.5 percent) above budget. Net of energy cost, operating revenue was $7,554,198 (13.4 percent) below budget. This shortfall will require additional budget augmentation, which will be included in REU’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 year-end adjustments and requests. The decrease in margin compared to prior years is primarily due to an increase in REU’s power costs. The primary driver for increased wholesale sales were sales into the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and monthly natural gas sales at index as part of REU’s hedging plan.

Expenses
Power Cost (Cost of Energy)
The combined costs for generation, purchases from the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), Big Horn Wind Project, contracts, and the spot market, were $43,778,611 (84.9 percent) above budget projections. The cost of Redding Power Plant generation was higher than forecast due to an increase in load, the ongoing drought’s impact on hydro deliveries resulted in replacement power purchases at elevated prices, a higher price of natural gas, and the inclusion of gas purchases for wholesale energy sales. The previous nine months are the worst hydropower deliveries in history due to multi-year stretches of dry weather in California. While REU has hedged natural gas costs for expected generation, spot power and gas purchases were required to make up the massive shortfall in hydropower deliveries. The total cost of energy increased by $26,154,351 (37.8 percent) year-over-year. Power Cost for the load (Power Cost less Wholesale Sales) increased $9,637,330 year-over-year (20.4 percent).

System Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
System O&M costs were $4,590,509 (11.1 percent), below projections. Approximately 60 percent of the savings are attributable to employee vacancies (realized savings). Other factors include the delay of expenditures and activities until future periods (unrealized savings).

Debt Service and Capital Outlay
Debt service payments and obligations through March totaled $10.8 million (on plan). Capital expenditures totaled $11.4 million (52.3 percent spent).

Packet Pg. 279
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter Page 3 Special Fund Expenditures
Special Fund Expenditures include the expenditures for Public Benefit and Cap-and-Trade Programs, which totaled $4,919,436 (46.5 percent spent) through March 2023.

Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance
The unrestricted cash balance at the end of March was $35.0 million, representing approximately 109 days of cash. REU’s Financial Management Policy (Council Policy 1414) has a minimum of 75 days of cash and a goal of 150 days of cash.

Director’s Contingency Fund
The REU Director’s Contingency Fund was not utilized through March.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
c: Finance Director
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Notes on Financial Operating Statement
Attachment 2 - Electric Utility Financial Results for March 2023 Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for March 2023 Attachment 4 - Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance March 2023 Attachment 5 - Industry Update
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment 1
City of Redding Electric Utility
Notes to Financial Report
Notes on Financial Operating Statement
Operating revenues are divided into three revenue elements: Retail Sales are sales of electricity to end-use customers; Wholesale Sales are to customers who resell electricity; Other Revenue includes the sale of services, joint-pole arrangements, interest income, and other miscellaneous revenue generated in the operations of Redding Electric Utility (REU).

Operating Expenses are divided into two expense elements: Power Cost and System O&M.

Cost of Energy summarizes Purchased Power costs. The primary sources of purchased power include Western Area Power Administration deliveries and long-term contracts for Wind Energy through M-S-R. Fuel expenses, purchases from the spot market, and expenses associated with participation in the California Independent System Operator make up the remainder. The Generation and Transmission component comprises power plant variable costs (fuel) and fixed costs (all non-fuel costs), as well as all JPA costs (M-S-R and TANC), except Wind Energy.

The Wholesale Sales and Power Costs budgets are based on known contracts and confirmed resources. Throughout the year, an effort is made to provide the most cost-effective energy supply for our ratepayers. This is often done by buying and selling natural gas or electricity to reduce the overall cost. This could include selling natural gas and replacing it with less expensive electricity than burning the gas in our power plant. It could also include selling energy we have contracted for at one trading hub and buying it at another less expensive one. It could also include maximizing the value of our gas storage facility to purchase natural gas in one month when it is less expensive and use it or sell it in another month. All these transactions benefit our customers but significantly inflate the Wholesale Sales and Cost of Energy numbers over their original budgets. This is because accounting rules require us to record these transactions at their gross revenue and expense amounts and not on the net benefit to the Utility.

System O&M Expenses summarize costs for all other functional groups, i.e., Administration, Customer Services, Engineering, Financial Services, Line, Compliance, and Resources. Special Revenue funds, i.e., Public Benefits and Cap-and-Trade, are shown separately. Debt Service is paid twice per fiscal year, once in December and again in June. Capital Outlay includes currentyear appropriations and unfinished projects approved by Council in prior years.

This financial report provides year-to-date comparisons to the current budget and the same yearto-date results for the prior year. Operating revenues are reported as billed. Costs for energy, other operating expenses, and capital outlay are recorded when paid. For this report, debt payments are spread evenly over the year, giving a more helpful picture of the financial results.

Projections are based on normal weather trends and known industry activity. If actual weather conditions are above or below average for the month or unexpected industry disruption occurs, revenue and expenses will increase or decrease accordingly. REU’s residential and small commercial rate structures are heavily weighted on volumetric charges ($/kWh), and abnormal weather causes more significant variances in net operating results, emphasizing the difference between the rate structure and cost structure.

The recorded results are preliminary and subject to revision until the final audit is complete.

Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Notes on Financial Operating Statement (9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL RESULTS ‐ MARCH 31, 2023
YTD‐Actual YTD‐Budget Variance Variance YTD‐Actual
March March % Value March
Item FY2023 FY2023 FY2023 FY2023 FY2022
Energy
System Load (MWh) 600,963                                               553,224 8.6% 47,739                                                  578,968 Operating Revenues
Retail Sales 100,843,376                                   94,586,000 6.6% 6,257,376                                       96,314,055 Wholesale Sales 38,485,561                                       7,325,298 425.4% 31,160,263                                     21,968,540 Miscellaneous Income 4,921,307                                          ‐ 6,114,533 19.5% (1,193,226)                                        4,068,699 Total Operating Revenues 144,250,244                                108,025,831 33.5% 36,224,414                                  122,351,294 Operating Expenses
Power Cost
Purchased Power 26,715,790                                     12,918,472 106.8% 13,797,318                                     19,115,757 Generation, Transmission and JPA (Variable) 46,489,857                                     17,187,250 170.5% 29,302,607                                     26,349,485 Generation A&G and O&M (Fixed) 22,116,689                                     21,438,003 3.2% 678,685                                          23,702,743 Subtotal Power Cost 95,322,33                  6                  51,543,725 84.9% 43,778,611                                   69,167,985 System O&M
General & Administrative 4,632,544                                          ‐ 5,810,340 20.3% (1,177,796)                                        5,359,965 Payment in Lieu of Tax 4,685,100                                         4,685,100 0.0% 0                                                        4,098,000 Transmission & Distribution 19,947,129                                      ‐ 22,803,100 12.5% (2,855,971)                                      19,097,178 Customer & Field Services 7,471,411                                          ‐ 8,028,152 6.9% (556,741)                                           6,723,662 Subtotal System O&M 36,736,183                                    ‐ 41,326,692 11.1% (4,590,509)                                    35,278,805 Total Operating Expenses 132,058,519 $             $               92,870,417 42.2% 39,188,102 $                $             104,446,790 Net Operating Revenue 12,191,725 $                $                ‐ 15,155,414 19.6% (2,963,688) $                $               17,904,505 Total Debt Service 10,799,266 $                $               10,821,855 0% (22,589) $                      $                  9,658,854 YTD‐Actual Budget % of Budget Budget YTD‐Actual
March Annual Spent Remaining March
Item FY2023 FY2023 FY2023 FY2023 FY2022
Capital Outlay
Capital Outlay (Revenue Funded) 11,415,211                                     21,831,680 52.3% 10,416,469                                     11,306,682 Capital Outlay (Bond Funded)
Total Capital Outlay 11,415,211 $                $               21,831,680 52.3% 10,416,469 $                $               11,306,682 Special Fund Expenditures
Public Benefit Programs 1,889,116                                         3,072,090 61.5% 1,182,974                                         2,943,061 Cap‐and‐Trade Programs 3,030,320                                         7,517,860 40.3% 4,487,540                                         2,952,424 Total Special Fund Expenditures 4,919,436 $                  $               10,589,950 46.5% 5,670,514 $                  $                  5,895,484 Financial Results (14,942,188) $              $                (8,956,516) Council Report
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Electric Utility Financial Results for March 2023 (9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL DASHBOARD ‐ MARCH 31, 2023
‐0.3

2.1 3.7

4.6 4.8

5.2 4.8

4.3 6.3
(2)
‐
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16
18 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$‐Millions
Retail Sales ($‐Millions)
Cummulative Difference 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2023 Budget 2.04.2 9.7 15.4 16.519.1 26.0 35.1 39.2 ‐
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 40
45 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$‐Millions
Operating Expense ($‐Millions)
Cummulative Difference 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2023 Budget Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for March 2023 (9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter) Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Unrestricted Cash - 2022-23 43.7 45.7 48.4 43.0 43.3 40.6 39.8 36.2 35.0 32.8Unrestricted Cash - 2021-22 52.0 57.6 58.4 59.1 54.0 54.7 53.2 52.7 52.9 48.0 44.2 44.9

20.025.030.035.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.0
MILLION $

REU UNRESTRICTED CASH BALANCE
JULY 2021 ‐ JUNE 2023
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Attachment 4 - Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance March 2023 (9.5(b)--Electric Utility's City of Redding Electric Utility
Industry Activities Update – April 2023
Federal Legislation Update
Senator Feinstein, California’s longest-serving senator, announced her retirement and will not seek reelection in 2024. Senator Feinstein served more than three decades. For many, including NCPA, she was a go-to for state-specific projects.

Mid-March, the Biden Administration released its budget proposal for the fiscal year 2024, officially starting to set funding for the next fiscal year. This budget reflects the opening gambit in what will likely be a high-stakes political engagement later this year when federal funding and the debt ceiling are on the table – with a government shutdown and government default seen as real possibilities.

State Legislative Update
More than 2,300 bills have been submitted, and the NCPA and CMUA L&R committees are reviewing and giving input on more than 300 bills that affect the energy/water utilities.

As reported in our last update, Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) is a significant concern. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is poised to adopt (mid-April 2023) regulation placing new requirements on all of California’s public fleets to begin transitioning medium and heavyduty fleet vehicles to zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) technologies within the next few years. The time frames are, at best, short-sided as vehicle availability is practically nonexistent, procurement lead times are years out, and costs are double and triple of current like and similar vehicles. CMUA, NCPA, and SCPPA have been able to seek an author (AB1594 Garcia) that has been introduced that would, at least if passed, force CARB to reopen the regulatory process allowing us to advance clarity in the procurement of medium and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles by a public agency.

Other bills of interest we are closely following include service energization timelines for electric vehicles connected to the electrical grid. This bill would prohibit an electrical corporation from raising rates above the inflation rate. This bill would, in principle, allow multistate regional transmission system organization membership, planning, and resource procurement, ratepayer protection, renewable hydrogen, wildfire management reporting and identification of trees that need to be removed from Tier one, two, disconnection of residential services based upon temperatures, permitting of broadband on utility structures, to name a few. A concern many have within the POUs is the constant threat of legislation that whittles away at local control and oversight. All the L&R committees representing the POUs diligently identify and work with legislators and their staff, always endeavoring that “POUs” interests are understood.

Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Industry Update (9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter) State Regulatory Update
CARB Releases 15-Day Regulatory Language for ACF Regulation: On March 23, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) published its modified Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) regulatory language (15-Day Language). CARB is expected to approve the ACF at its April 27-28 Board hearing. Municipal utilities, including Redding, are concerned that the rule will hinder the ability to maintain systems, restore services and provide mutual aid during emergencies. Utilities are working on legislative and regulatory fronts to obtain revisions prioritizing community health, safety, and welfare. Redding Utilities submitted a comment letter to CARB on April 7th detailing vehicle usage during recent wildfires and heavy snow events. The letter explained how the proposed regulation would jeopardize vehicle availability for future events. The letter requested that CARB address the regulation’s shortcomings noted by the Joint Public Agencies and open an ACF implementation rulemaking immediately following the adoption of the proposed rule to ensure a forum for reviewing the ongoing implementation of the regulation.

OEIS Initiates Updating Safety Requirements Addressing Increasing Wildfire Risk: The Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety (OEIS) has initiated a process to develop formal recommendations to the California Public Utilities Commission regarding changes to requirements to mitigate the effects of climate change and prevent utility-caused catastrophic wildfires. Potential recommendations include changes to safety standards that directly impact publicly owned utilities such as Redding Electric Utility. OEIS has commissioned a study to evaluate existing safety requirements and propose updates. REU is following the issue closely and will work with its associations to provide input in the regulatory process.

Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Industry Update (9.5(b)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to reject the report and request additional or different information.

Background/Analysis
Attached for review and information purposes is the Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2023. The report, which only pertains to the City of Redding’s (City) General Fund, is divided into four sections. Section One compares revenue received to-date to budgeted figures. Section Two provides the Council with a summary of all General Fund revenues received for the month of March, as well as a summary of all revenues received year-to-date.

This section also compares (1) actual revenues through March 2023 to projected revenues through March 2023, and (2) actual revenues received to-date to the cash flow estimates developed by staff. Section Three summarizes expenditures by division for the month of March, as well as expenditures year-to-date. Section Three also compares (1) actual monthly expenditures to projected monthly expenditures, and (2) actual expenditures to-date to the cash flow estimates developed by staff. Section Four compares actual expenditures to the budget as amended.

Revenue
Total revenue to-date is $68.8 million, or $2,165,830 (3.3 percent) above staff’s cash flow projection. Below is a breakdown of each of the General Fund revenue sources.

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.10(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 2023
Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 287
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023 Page 2 Property Tax revenue, year-to-date, totals $14,933,484 or $498,957 (3.5 percent) above staff’s cash flow projection of $14,434,527. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to property tax.

Sales tax revenue, year-to-date, totals $23,275,125 or $2,535,673 (9.8 percent) below staff’s cash flow projection of $25,810,798. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to projected sales tax revenue.

Transient Occupancy Tax revenue, year-to-date, totals $5,575,657 or $23,209 (.4 percent) below staff’s cash flow projection of $5,598,866. Staff is not recommending a change at this time to Transient Occupancy Tax.

All other tax revenues’ year-to-date totals are $3,180,516 or $153,003 (5.1 percent) above staff’s cash flow projection of $3,027,513. The other tax revenues include franchise fees, business licenses, real property transfer tax, and cannabis tax. Staff is not recommending any additional changes at this time to all other tax revenues.

Revenues from the Internal Departments year-to-date totals $9,639,577 which is $61,757 below staff’s cash flow projection of $9,701,334. Revenues from the Internal Departments include fixed reimbursements for the Cost Allocation Plan, Public Works Administration, NDPES, and In-lieu payments from Redding Electric Utility and the Airport funds. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to all other tax revenues.

Licenses and permit revenues, year-to-date, totals $1,935,988 or $235,150 (13.8 percent) above staff’s cash flow projection of $1,700,838. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to all other tax revenues.

Fines and Penalties revenues, year-to-date, totals $921,430 which is $493,316 above staff’s cash flow projection of $428,114. This includes an adjustment made for uncollectable fines and penalties as estimated by staff through March 2023. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to all other tax revenues.

Revenues from Other Governmental Agencies, year-to-date, totals $2,536,890 which is $1,560,372 (59.8 percent) above staff’s cash flow projection of $976,518. This is primarily due to the timing of completion of various capital projects. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to all other governmental revenues.

Charges for current services, year-to-date, totals $3,965,846 which is $1,466,315 above staff’s cash flow projection of $2,499,531. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time to charges for current services.

All remaining revenue, year-to-date, totals $5,165,331 or $1,905,861 (58.5 percent) above staff’s cash flow projection of $3,259,470. Staff is not recommending any changes at this time for other revenue projections.

Expenditures
Expenditures through March 2023 (excluding encumbrances) total $84,864,614 or $4,131,987 (4.6 percent) below staff’s projection. Encumbrances at month-end total $6,062,668.

Packet Pg. 288
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023 Page 3 The City of Redding General Fund budgets for overtime expenses throughout various City Departments. The overtime expenditures, through the quarter ending March 2023, total $4,598,429 or $1,682,339 over staff projections.
• Police Overtime is $1,497,745 or $392,995 above staff projection • Fire Overtime is $2,967,370 or $1,221,017 above staff projection • Community Services Overtime is $65,039 or $59,789 above staff projection • Public Works Overtime is $52,647 or $147 above staff projection • All Other Overtime is $15,629 or $8,340 above staff projection Although all of these expenses are over budget there are no additional budget amendments necessary at this time. Each department is projected to have adequate savings in other personnel budget items, additional cross charges to other City departments, and unbudgeted revenues that cover costs incurred.

Reserves
As of March 31, 2023, the General Fund Cash Balance was $22,882,697 or 22.7 percent. At year end, the ten-year plan projects the reserve to be 22.6 percent. This could change depending upon the final revenue and expenditure performance. Typically, the adjustment to the reserve is performed upon completion of the annual audit. Staff is not recommending any changes to the projected reserves at this time.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balance and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
Quarterly Report March 2023
Packet Pg. 289
Quarterly Report

APPENDIX A

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND

EXPENDITURES
For the Period
July 2022 through March 2023
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) Cash Flow
Estimate Actual Actual Actual Estimate Actual Actual Actual Revenue FYE 2023 FYE 2023 FYE 2022 FYE 2021 FYE 2023 FYE 2022 FYE 2021 FYE 2020 Sales tax $25,810,798 $23,275,125 $24,447,406 $22,200,305 $33,206,810 $28,374,570 $30,189,084 $25,859,713 Property tax 14,434,527 14,933,484 13,915,331 13,116,084 25,339,140 23,961,450 22,820,856 21,182,617 Transient Occupancy Tax 5,598,866 5,575,657 6,252,592 4,230,524 7,529,510 5,399,530 5,915,535 5,352,432 Internal Departments 9,701,334 9,639,577 9,999,908 9,306,878 12,935,160 12,992,510 13,090,570 11,537,660 Revenue from Other Governments 976,518 2,536,890 1,447,188 2,060,937 2,142,400 4,581,750 2,929,851 4,309,727 Other 10,118,733 12,845,873 13,255,744 11,010,489 13,960,530 13,913,980 14,679,657 16,362,005 Total Revenue $66,640,776 $68,806,606 $69,318,169 $61,925,217 $95,113,550 $89,223,790 $89,625,553 $84,604,154 The above revenue chart excludes transfers
Cash Flow
Estimate Actual Actual Actual Budgeted Actual Actual Actual Expenditures FYE 2023 FYE 2023 FYE 2022 FYE 2021 FYE 2023* FYE 2022 FYE 2021 FYE 2020 Police $31,269,915 $31,749,150 $28,756,537 $25,212,310 $44,413,140 $39,682,218 $35,049,109 $31,641,369 Fire 18,177,743 19,442,738 19,463,711 20,662,519 25,842,440 26,045,242 28,526,091 21,774,444 Public Works 12,430,268 11,865,088 6,335,943 4,851,817 23,324,000 9,511,416 7,221,574 6,889,613 Development Services 4,958,079 4,149,824 3,843,482 3,746,516 7,354,030 5,170,813 5,319,892 4,556,208 Community Services 8,301,410 5,757,744 4,698,787 3,958,102 10,114,410 6,773,247 5,936,020 5,550,231 Other 13,859,186 11,900,070 8,761,239 8,552,280 20,352,120 12,630,296 10,132,220 9,533,422 Total Expenditures $88,996,601 $84,864,614 $71,859,699 $66,983,544 $131,400,140 $99,813,232 $92,184,906 $79,945,287 *Includes carryover amount of $27,511,010 from prior year's budget.

July through March Amounts Total For Fiscal Year
Comparison of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures (Budgetary Basis) Report for the Period July through March, 2023

REVENUE COMPARISON
July through March Amounts Total For Fiscal Year

EXPENDITURE COMPARISON
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended $0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
Sales Tax Property Tax TOT Other Gov. Internal Other
General Fund Revenues Through March 2023
(In Thousands)
Budget
Actual
Prior Year
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended $0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$50,000
Police Fire Public Works Development Services Community Services Other Expenditures General Fund Expenditures Through March 2023
(In Thousands)
Budget
Actual
Prior Year
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended Section One
Actual Revenues Compared to Cash Flow Estimates
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) RVR213A CITY OF REDDING 10:39:10 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ACTUAL REVENUES

GENERAL FUNDS
----------------- Current Month ------------------ ------------------ Year to Date ------------------ Monthly Over YTD Over ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Projection Actual (Under) % Projection Actual (Under) %

GENERAL FUNDTAXES
Property Taxes 7,333 - (7,333) 0.0 14,434,527 14,933,484 498,957 103.4Sales Tax-Nondedicated 2,465,597 2,339,181 (126,416) 94.8 25,810,798 23,275,125 (2,535,673) 90.1Transient Occupancy Tax 553,059 466,959 (86,100) 84.4 5,598,866 5,575,657 (23,209) 99.5Viacom Cablevision - - - - 692,655 670,146 (22,509) 96.7Pacific Gas & Electric Co. - 29,148 29,148 - - 29,148 29,148 -Business License Tax 72,916 73,621 705 100.9 656,244 725,361 69,117 110.5Real Property Transfer Tax 29,166 16,488 (12,678) 56.5 262,494 336,440 73,946 128.1Commercial Cultivation Cannabis - - - - 103,620 115,415 11,795 111.3Retail Cannabis Business Tax - 80,334 80,334 - 1,312,500 1,297,658 (14,842) 98.8Other Commercial Cannabis Business Tax - - - * - 6,348 6,348 * ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Taxes 3,128,071 3,005,731 (122,340) 96.0 48,871,704 46,964,782 (1,906,922) 96.0 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ LICENSES AND PERMITSAnimal Licenses 3,333 5,860 2,527 175.8 29,997 43,662 13,665 145.5Building Permits 134,862 76,301 (58,561) 56.5 1,213,758 1,128,435 (85,323) 92.9Engineering Encroachment Permit 7,500 3,292 (4,208) 43.8 67,500 243,335 175,835 360.4Electical Permits 16,349 18,562 2,213 113.5 147,141 244,382 97,241 166.0Transportation Permit 775 1,908 1,133 246.1 6,975 6,988 13 100.1Plumbing Permits 9,099 8,001 (1,098) 87.9 81,891 84,900 3,009 103.6Mechanical Permit 16,231 17,888 1,657 110.2 146,079 167,890 21,811 114.9Engineering Grading Permits 833 1,518 685 182.2 7,497 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ 16,396 8,899 218.7 Total Licenses and Permits 188,982 133,330 (55,652) 70.5 1,700,838 1,935,988 235,150 113.8 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ FINES, FORFEITS, AND PENALTIES Traffic Safety Fines 28,791 63,776 34,985 221.5 351,839 738,841 387,002 209.9Code Enforcement Fines 12,166 207,855 195,689 708.4 109,494 1,489,961 1,380,467 360.7Other Fines & Fees 4,416 7,630 3,214 172.7 39,744 65,926 26,182 165.8Cannabis Delinquency Penalty - 12,540 12,540 * - 24,589 24,589 * ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Fines, Forfeits & Penalties 45,373 291,801 246,428 643.1 501,077 2,319,317 1,818,240 462.8 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ REVENUE FROM INTERNAL DEPARTMENTSFixed Reimbursements 421,817 421,818 1 100.0 3,796,353 3,796,365 12 100.0Fixed Reimbursement Public Works Admin 76,317 69,452 (6,865) 91.0 686,853 625,065 (61,788) 91.0Fixed Reimbursement NDPES 38,810 38,811 1 100.0 349,290 349,297 7 100.0In-lieu Payment from 821--Muni Airport 20,416 20,417 1 100.0 183,744 183,750 6 100.0In-Lieu Payment from Division 854-Electric 520,566 520,567 1 100.0 4,685,094 4,685,100 6 100.0 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Revenue from Internal Departments 1,077,926 1,071,065 (6,861) 99.3 9,701,334 9,639,577 (61,757) 99.3 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ * Unbudgeted revenue 1 Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended RVR213A CITY OF REDDING 10:39:10 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ACTUAL REVENUES

GENERAL FUNDS
(continued)
----------------- Current Month ------------------ ------------------ Year to Date ------------------ Monthly Over YTD Over ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Projection Actual (Under) % Projection Actual (Under) %

GENERAL FUNDREVENUE FROM OTHER GOVERMENTAL AGENCIES
State Grant Operating for General Gov't 25,000 83,902 58,902 335.6 225,000 194,844 (30,156) 86.5Federal Grant-Operating-General Gov't - 21,512 21,512 - - 162,760 162,760 -Shasta County Grant - Operating - Police 19,601 8,836 (10,765) 45.0 176,409 79,116 (97,293) 44.8SHASTA CO OPERATING REIMB-POLICE - - - - - 69,840 69,840 -State Reimbursement - - - * - 908,992 908,992 *STATE LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OPERATING-POLICE - - - * - (3,862) (3,862) *Reimbursement of Mandated Costs 4,750 - (4,750) 0.0 42,750 101,535 58,785 237.5POST Grant - Operating - Police 4,750 11,103 6,353 233.7 42,750 102,605 59,855 240.0Home Owner Property Tax Relief 12,750 - (12,750) 0.0 114,750 71,848 (42,902) 62.6Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax - 96,184 96,184 - 45,000 96,184 51,184 213.7School District Contrib-Operating-Police 22,327 12,038 (10,289) 53.9 200,943 541,688 340,745 269.5Redding Rancheria Payment 10,158 - (10,158) 0.0 91,422 91,425 3 100.0Contribution RABA - Operating - Police 2,083 2,083 - 100.0 18,747 18,750 3 100.0Buckeye Fire Service Dist-Operating-Fire - - - * - 5,000 5,000 *Buckeye Fire District - Capital - Fire - 700 700 * - 80,087 80,087 *SHASCOM - Payroll 2,083 - (2,083) 0.0 18,747 16,078 (2,669) 85.7 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Revenue - Other Government Agencies 103,502 236,358 132,856 228.3 976,518 2,536,890 1,560,372 259.7 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ OTHER REVENUESLate Fees 141,666 132,643 (9,023) 93.6 1,274,994 1,217,471 (57,523) 95.4Contributions - Operating - General Gov't 36,661 105,350 68,689 287.3 189,843 139,053 (50,790) 73.2Compensation - Loss & Property Damage - 34,845 34,845 - - 74,418 74,418 -Miscellaneous Receipts 24,706 78,293 53,587 316.8 268,054 470,050 201,996 175.3Reimbursement 22,523 - (22,523) 0.0 202,707 286,522 83,815 141.3 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Other Revenues 225,556 351,131 125,575 155.6 1,935,598 2,187,514 251,916 113.0 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICESPlanning Permits (Subdivisions) 41,144 59,385 18,241 144.3 370,296 386,497 16,201 104.3Building Plan - Record Fees 1,538 2,488 950 161.7 13,842 21,724 7,882 156.9Building Plan - Check Fees 47,325 46,552 (773) 98.3 425,925 594,223 168,298 139.5Fees for Outside Plan Checks 95 - (95) 0.0 855 - (855) 0.0Plan Check Fees - Fire Department 6,250 5,925 (325) 94.8 56,250 91,330 35,080 162.3Engineering Land Development Fees 8,333 (33,542) (41,875) 402.5 74,997 387,785 312,788 517.0Technology Surcharge 10,134 16,904 6,770 166.8 91,206 170,631 79,425 187.0Cannabis Application & Permit Fees 39,570 139,368 99,798 352.2 356,130 523,544 167,414 147.0Sale of Publications 7 8 1 114.2 63 174 111 276.1Animal Shelter Fees 583 428 (155) 73.4 5,247 4,204 (1,043) 80.1Inspection Fees 241 53 (188) 21.9 2,169 3,432 1,263 158.2Fingerprint Fees 833 910 77 109.2 7,497 5,699 (1,798) 76.0Fire Permits & Fees 24,166 14,535 (9,631) 60.1 217,494 73,762 (143,732) 33.9 * Unbudgeted revenue
2 Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended RVR213A CITY OF REDDING 10:39:10 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ACTUAL REVENUES

GENERAL FUNDS
(continued)
----------------- Current Month ------------------ ------------------ Year to Date ------------------ Monthly Over YTD Over ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Projection Actual (Under) % Projection Actual (Under) %

GENERAL FUNDCHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
DUI - Emergency Response 6,149 7,307 1,158 118.8 55,341 93,307 37,966 168.6Swimming Pool Receipts 13,380 9,027 (4,353) 67.4 120,420 26,867 (93,553) 22.3RAC Swim Shop / Rental 3,250 90 (3,160) 2.7 29,250 18,443 (10,807) 63.0RAC Admission 10,513 - (10,513) 0.0 94,617 62,520 (32,097) 66.0RAC Swim Team 1,051 - (1,051) 0.0 9,459 6,554 (2,905) 69.2Swimming Pool Concession 5,256 - (5,256) 0.0 47,304 32,533 (14,771) 68.7Other Charges & Fees 12,302 2,906 (9,396) 23.6 105,720 656,696 550,976 621.1Recreation Sports 46,161 52,568 6,407 113.8 415,449 358,794 (56,655) 86.3INVESTMENT/BANK CHARGE HOLDING ACCT - 111,656 111,656 * - 447,127 447,127 *Bad Debt Writeoff (8,107) (624,630) (616,523) 704.8 (72,963) (1,397,887) (1,324,924) 915.8 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Charges for Current Services 270,174 (188,062) (458,236) 69.6 2,426,568 2,567,959 141,391 105.8 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ REVENUE FROM THE USE OF MONEY & PROPERTYRental - Land or Facility 42,680 67,891 25,211 159.0 384,120 342,490 (41,630) 89.1SHASCOM Base Rent - Police Portion 6,058 1,497 (4,561) 24.7 54,522 74,479 19,957 136.6Investment Income 9,833 36,356 26,523 369.7 88,497 237,159 148,662 267.9Fiscal Agent Investment Income - - - * - 451 451 * ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Revenue - Use of Money & Property 58,571 105,744 47,173 180.5 527,139 654,579 127,440 124.1 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5,098,155 5,007,098 (91,057) 98.2 66,640,776 68,806,606 2,165,830 103.2 =========== =========== =========== ===== =========== =========== =========== ===== RVR213A 10:39:10 4/06/2023 3 Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended Section Two
Comparative Summary of Actual Revenues
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) RVR213B CITY OF REDDING 10:39:10 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ACTUAL REVENUES

GENERAL FUNDS
------------------ Budget Year -------------------
Budget Over ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ As Amended Actual (Under) %

GENERAL FUNDTAXES
Property Taxes 25,339,140 14,933,484 (10,405,656) 58.9Sales Tax-Nondedicated 33,206,810 23,275,125 (9,931,685) 70.0Transient Occupancy Tax 7,529,510 5,575,657 (1,953,853) 74.0Viacom Cablevision 923,540 670,146 (253,394) 72.5Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 351,200 29,148 (322,052) 8.2Business License Tax 875,000 725,361 (149,639) 82.8Real Property Transfer Tax 350,000 336,440 (13,560) 96.1Commercial Cultivation Cannabis 138,160 115,415 (22,745) 83.5Retail Cannabis Business Tax 1,750,000 1,297,658 (452,342) 74.1Other Commercial Cannabis Business Tax - 6,348 6,348 * ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Taxes 70,463,360 46,964,782 (23,498,578) 66.6 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ LICENSES AND PERMITSAnimal Licenses 40,000 43,662 3,662 109.1Building Permits 1,618,350 1,128,435 (489,915) 69.7Engineering Encroachment Permit 90,000 243,335 153,335 270.3Electical Permits 196,200 244,382 48,182 124.5Transportation Permit 9,300 6,988 (2,312) 75.1Plumbing Permits 109,200 84,900 (24,300) 77.7Mechanical Permit 194,790 167,890 (26,900) 86.1Engineering Grading Permits 10,000 16,396 6,396 163.9 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Licenses and Permits 2,267,840 1,935,988 (331,852) 85.3 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ FINES, FORFEITS, AND PENALTIESTraffic Safety Fines 518,860 738,841 219,981 142.3Code Enforcement Fines 146,000 1,489,961 1,343,961 20.5Other Fines & Fees 53,000 65,926 12,926 124.3Cannabis Delinquency Penalty - 24,589 24,589 * ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Fines, Forfeits & Penalties 717,860 2,319,317 1,601,457 323.0 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ REVENUE FROM INTERNAL DEPARTMENTSFixed Reimbursements 5,061,820 3,796,365 (1,265,455) 75.0Fixed Reimbursement Public Works Admin 915,810 625,065 (290,745) 68.2Fixed Reimbursement NDPES 465,730 349,297 (116,433) 74.9In-lieu Payment from 821--Muni Airport 245,000 183,750 (61,250) 75.0In-Lieu Payment from Division 854-Electric 6,246,800 4,685,100 (1,561,700) 7 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ 5.0 Total Revenue from Internal Departments 12,935,160 9,639,577 (3,295,583) 74.5 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ * Unbudgeted revenue 1 Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended RVR213B CITY OF REDDING 10:39:10 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ACTUAL REVENUES

GENERAL FUNDS
(continued)
------------------ Budget Year -------------------
Budget Over ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ As Amended Actual (Under) %

GENERAL FUNDREVENUE FROM OTHER GOVERMENTAL AGENCIES
State Grant Operating for General Gov't 300,000 194,844 (105,156) 64.9Federal Grant-Operating-General Gov't 443,520 162,760 (280,760) 36.6Shasta County Grant - Operating - Police 272,180 79,116 (193,064) 29.0SHASTA CO OPERATING REIMB-POLICE 65,000 69,840 4,840 107.4State Reimbursement - 908,992 908,992 *STATE LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OPERATING-POLICE - (3,862) (3,862) *Reimbursement of Mandated Costs 57,000 101,535 44,535 178.1POST Grant - Operating - Police 57,000 102,605 45,605 180.0Home Owner Property Tax Relief 153,000 71,848 (81,152) 46.9Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax 45,000 96,184 51,184 213.7School District Contrib-Operating-Police 577,800 541,688 (36,112) 93.7Redding Rancheria Payment 121,900 91,425 (30,475) 75.0Contribution RABA - Operating - Police 25,000 18,750 (6,250) 75.0Buckeye Fire Service Dist-Operating-Fire - 5,000 5,000 *Buckeye Fire District - Capital - Fire - 80,087 80,087 *SHASCOM - Payroll 25,000 16,078 (8,922) 64.3 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Revenue - Other Government Agencies 2,142,400 2,536,890 394,490 118.4 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ OTHER REVENUESLate Fees 1,700,000 1,217,471 (482,529) 71.6Contributions - Operating - General Gov't 299,850 139,053 (160,797) 46.3Compensation - Loss & Property Damage 34,500 74,418 39,918 215.7Miscellaneous Receipts 342,200 470,050 127,850 137.3Reimbursement 270,280 286,522 16,242 106.0 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Other Revenues 2,646,830 2,187,514 (459,316) 82.6 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICESPlanning Permits (Subdivisions) 493,740 386,497 (107,243) 78.2Building Plan - Record Fees 18,460 21,724 3,264 117.6Building Plan - Check Fees 567,910 594,223 26,313 104.6Fees for Outside Plan Checks 1,140 - (1,140) 0.0Plan Check Fees - Fire Department 75,000 91,330 16,330 121.7Engineering Land Development Fees 100,000 387,785 287,785 387.7Technology Surcharge 121,610 170,631 49,021 140.3Cannabis Application & Permit Fees 474,850 523,544 48,694 110.2Sale of Publications 90 174 84 193.3Animal Shelter Fees 7,000 4,204 (2,796) 60.0Inspection Fees 2,900 3,432 532 118.3Fingerprint Fees 10,000 5,699 (4,301) 56.9Fire Permits & Fees 290,000 73,762 (216,238) 25.4 * Unbudgeted revenue
2 Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended RVR213B CITY OF REDDING 10:39:10 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ACTUAL REVENUES

GENERAL FUNDS
(continued)
------------------ Budget Year -------------------
Budget Over ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ As Amended Actual (Under) %

GENERAL FUNDCHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
DUI - Emergency Response 73,800 93,307 19,507 126.4Swimming Pool Receipts 160,570 26,867 (133,703) 16.7RAC Swim Shop / Rental 39,000 18,443 (20,557) 47.2RAC Admission 126,160 62,520 (63,640) 49.5RAC Swim Team 12,620 6,554 (6,066) 51.9Swimming Pool Concession 63,080 32,533 (30,547) 51.5Other Charges & Fees 142,630 656,696 514,066 460.4Recreation Sports 553,960 358,794 (195,166) 64.7INVESTMENT/BANK CHARGE HOLDING ACCT - 447,127 447,127 *Bad Debt Writeoff (97,300) (1,397,887) (1,300,587) 436.6 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Charges for Current Services 3,237,220 2,567,959 (669,261) 79.3 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ REVENUE FROM THE USE OF MONEY & PROPERTYRental - Land or Facility 512,170 342,490 (169,680) 66.8SHASCOM Base Rent - Police Portion 72,700 74,479 1,779 102.4Investment Income 118,010 237,159 119,149 200.9Fiscal Agent Investment Income - 451 451 * ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total Revenue - Use of Money & Property 702,880 654,579 (48,301) 93.1 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ TOTAL GENERAL FUND 95,113,550 68,806,606 (26,306,944) 72.3 =========== =========== =========== ===== RVR213B 10:39:10 4/06/2023 3 Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended Section Three
Actual Expenditures Compared to Cash Flow Estimates
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) EXR214 CITY OF REDDING 10:38:14 4/06/2023
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023
ACTUAL EXPENDITURES COMPARED TO CASH FLOW ESTIMATES PAGE 1 GENERAL FUND ----------------- Current Month ------------------ ------------------ Year to Date ------------------ Monthly Over YTD Over
___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Projection Actual (Under) % Projection Actual (Under) % CITY COUNCIL 12,984 20,485 7,501 157.7 119,957 149,180 29,223 124.3 CITY CLERK 112,141 106,385 (5,756) 94.8 707,650 761,781 54,131 107.6 CITY MANAGER 70,877 83,413 12,536 117.6 670,105 964,791 294,686 143.9 CITY TREASURER 55,966 46,972 (8,994) 83.9 515,156 443,963 (71,193) 86.1 CITY ATTORNEY 30,133 45,562 15,429 151.2 240,325 373,962 133,637 155.6 CODE ENFORCEMENT 74,574 42,754 (31,820) 57.3 685,853 457,575 (228,278) 66.7 FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 130,511 197,847 67,336 151.5 1,214,232 1,526,293 312,061 125.7 NON DEPARTMENTAL 853,045 206,041 (647,004) 24.1 7,685,364 3,374,269 (4,311,095) 43.9 PURCHASING 49,762 50,809 1,047 102.1 459,241 448,522 (10,719) 97.6 PERSONNEL 47,727 63,157 15,430 132.3 444,675 513,666 68,991 115.5 PERMIT CENTER 60,672 64,087 3,415 105.6 562,368 683,549 121,181 121.5 BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 206,630 175,916 (30,714) 85.1 1,899,607 1,570,996 (328,611) 82.7 PLANNING 212,715 133,055 (79,660) 62.5 1,810,251 1,437,704 (372,547) 79.4 POLICE - ADMINISTRATION 268,584 318,665 50,081 118.6 2,476,262 2,863,108 386,846 115.6 POLICE - FIELD OPERATIONS 2,303,203 2,390,523 87,320 103.7 21,000,912 20,449,184 (551,728) 97.3 POLICE - INVESTIGATIONS 399,104 409,354 10,250 102.5 3,691,242 4,243,231 551,989 114.9 POLICE - SERVICES DIVISION 360,649 610,878 250,229 169.3 3,498,137 3,525,517 27,380 100.7 POLICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STAFF (7,606) 2,278 9,884 29.9 (47,830) 29,182 77,012 61.0 POLICE GRANTS 88,502 102,950 14,448 116.3 651,192 638,929 (12,263) 98.1 ANIMAL REGULATION 77,422 80,121 2,699 103.4 696,798 722,360 25,562 103.6 FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 146,677 155,643 8,966 106.1 1,355,851 1,374,337 18,486 101.3 FIRE - SUPPRESSION 1,791,873 2,238,004 446,131 124.8 15,905,228 17,057,653 1,152,425 107.2 FIRE - PREVENTION 99,376 94,421 (4,955) 95.0 916,664 1,010,748 94,084 110.2 PUBLIC WORKS-ENGINEERING 100,897 167,694 66,797 166.2 1,048,854 935,740 (113,114) 89.2 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 17,277 33,079 15,802 191.4 159,723 419,613 259,890 262.7 TRANSPORTATION/ENGINEERING (3,337) 12,399 15,736 371.5 (21,192) 43,850 65,042 206.9 STREETS-GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 396,422 547,596 151,174 138.1 3,616,719 3,210,304 (406,415) 88.7 STREETS-CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL OUTLAY 847,352 473,411 (373,941) 55.8 7,626,164 7,255,581 (370,583) 95.1 PARKS 628,738 401,839 (226,899) 63.9 5,722,452 3,531,363 (2,191,089) 61.7 RECREATION 219,016 153,700 (65,316) 70.1 2,011,194 1,653,911 (357,283) 82.2 COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION 61,257 62,633 1,376 102.2 567,764 572,470 4,706 100.8 MIDTOWN MALL 34 344 310 11.7 306 3,635 3,329 187.9
GENERAL FUND DEBT SERVICE 203,908 1,716,828 1,512,920 841.9 1,105,377 2,617,647 1,512,270 236.8 ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ ___________ ___________ ___________ _____ Total - General Government 9,917,085 11,208,843 1,291,758 113.0 88,996,601 84,864,614 (4,131,987) 95.3 =========== =========== =========== ===== =========== =========== =========== ===== EXR214 10:38:14 4/06/2023
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) Section Four
Actual Expenditures Compared to Budget
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) EXR58 CITY OF REDDING 10:38:37 4/06/23
Finance Department MONTH OF MAR. 2023
ACTUAL EXPENDITURES COMPARED TO BUDGET PAGE 1

GENERAL FUND
Budget Prior Year Current Year-to-Date Encumbrances Unencumbered % ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ _________ As Amended Appropriations Expenditures Expenditures Outstanding Balance Obligated CITY COUNCIL 179,630.00 - 20,485.04 149,180.44 107.24 30,342.32 83.1 CITY CLERK 916,290.00 52,320.00 106,385.17 761,780.64 1,918.76 204,910.60 78.8 CITY MANAGER 958,000.00 770.00 83,413.30 964,791.46 36.97 ( 6,058.43) 100.6 CITY TREASURER 707,380.00 2,600.00 46,972.04 443,963.25 .62 266,016.13 62.5 CITY ATTORNEY 377,740.00 - 45,562.35 373,962.03 920.64 2,857.33 99.2 CODE ENFORCEMENT 847,440.00 96,540.00 42,754.03 457,574.61 437.55 485,967.84 48.5 FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 1,676,520.00 38,900.00 197,847.01 1,526,293.15 15,250.43 173,876.42 89.8 NON DEPARTMENTAL 4,508,860.00 6,125,110.00 206,041.17 3,374,268.55 698,358.38 6,561,343.07 38.2 PURCHASING 634,090.00 - 50,808.65 448,522.28 - 185,567.72 70.7 PERSONNEL 623,300.00 - 63,157.30 513,665.91 14.42 109,619.67 82.4 PERMIT CENTER 777,550.00 5,020.00 64,086.54 683,548.66 - 99,021.34 87.3 BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 2,423,560.00 237,470.00 175,915.73 1,570,995.86 9,897.73 1,080,136.41 59.4 PLANNING 2,089,470.00 876,980.00 133,054.83 1,437,704.29 195,771.87 1,332,973.84 55.0 POLICE-ADMINISTRATION 3,419,930.00 120,940.00 318,665.35 2,863,107.62 63,564.02 614,198.36 82.6 POLICE-FIELD OPERATIONS 26,304,060.00 3,524,870.00 2,390,523.30 20,449,183.95 214,083.30 9,165,662.75 69.2 POLICE-INVESTIGATIONS 5,115,330.00 61,070.00 409,354.05 4,243,230.74 3,121.86 930,047.40 82.0 POLICE-SERVICES DIVISION 4,733,100.00 7,060.00 610,877.57 3,525,516.84 17,155.87 1,197,487.29 74.7 POLICE I/T STAFF ( 22,500.00) - 2,277.78 29,182.20 - ( 51,682.20) 0.0 POLICE GRANTS 772,850.00 376,430.00 102,950.07 638,928.82 1,149.72 509,201.46 55.6 ANIMAL REGULATION 929,070.00 - 80,120.85 722,359.55 227,780.37 ( 21,069.92) 102.2 FIRE-ADMINISTRATION 1,835,800.00 49,100.00 155,642.90 1,374,336.80 30,174.19 480,389.01 74.5 FIRE-SUPPRESSION 22,169,980.00 483,970.00 2,238,003.94 17,057,652.60 855,404.82 4,740,892.58 79.0 FIRE-PREVENTION 1,280,930.00 22,660.00 94,421.13 1,010,748.21 471.39 292,370.40 77.5 P/W-ENGINEERING 1,628,620.00 131,610.00 167,694.27 935,740.35 20,390.28 804,099.37 54.3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 211,580.00 350.00 33,079.09 419,613.12 2,255.64 ( 209,938.76) 199.0 TRANSPORTATION/ENGINEERING ( 10,550.00) - 12,398.77 43,849.55 - ( 54,399.55) 0.0 STREETS - GENERAL & ADM 4,439,710.00 502,590.00 547,595.70 3,210,304.05 161,139.81 1,570,856.14 68.2 STREETS - CONSTRUCTION 7,016,530.00 9,403,560.00 473,410.81 7,255,581.06 3,147,050.96 6,017,457.98 63.3 PARKS 1,291,240.00 5,246,640.00 401,838.80 3,531,363.24 351,464.02 2,655,052.74 59.3 RECREATION 2,665,390.00 121,100.00 153,700.35 1,653,911.13 23,986.29 1,108,592.58 60.2 COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMIN DIV. 766,690.00 23,350.00 62,633.42 572,469.78 20,760.92 196,809.30 75.0 MIDTOWN MALL 410.00 - 343.80 3,635.17 - ( 3,225.17) 886.6 GENERAL FUND DEBT SERVICE 2,621,130.00 - 1,716,828.49 2,617,646.92 - 3,483.08 99.8 ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ _____ Total - General Government 103,889,130.00 27,511,010.00 11,208,843.60 84,864,612.83 6,062,668.07 40,472,859.10 69.1 ============== ============== ============== ============== ============== ============== ===== EXR58 10:38:37 4/06/23
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023)

GENERAL FUND TEN YEAR PLAN
Amended December 2022
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) Amended Amended
21-22 22-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
Beginning Cash Balance 19,300 23,000 22,722 21,456 21,288 19,671 Revenues 103,021 94,104 96,730 99,612 102,596 105,658
Net Transfers 2,917 6,332 3,668 3,936 4,020 4,140
Total Revenues 105,938 100,437 100,398 103,548 106,615 109,798 Personnel Costs (65,161) (69,829) (73,273) (74,813) (77,646) (79,092) Operating Costs (21,438) (21,522) (21,391) (22,032) (22,693) (23,374) Capital Outlay (22,279) (8,543) (6,415) (6,507) (7,647) (8,932) Debt Service (2,630) (2,613) (2,118) (1,957) (1,965) (1,318) Savings 2,023 1,792 1,533 1,594 1,719 1,787
Net Expenditures (109,484) (100,715) (101,664) (103,716) (108,233) (110,929) Ending Cash Balance 15,754 22,722 21,456 21,288 19,671 18,540 Projections toward Council Objectives
Ending Cash as Percentage of
Expenditures 14.4% 22.6% 21.1% 20.5% 18.2% 16.7%
Projected Personnel Percentage 58.4% 68.1% 71.0% 71.0% 70.6% 70.2% Fiscal Year
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ending 2022 & 2023
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32
Projected Cash Balance 18,540 11,942 11,669 12,003 12,360 Projected Revenues 108,820 112,027 115,400 118,885 122,478 Projected Net Transfers 4,264 4,392 4,524 4,660 4,800
Total Projected Revenues 113,085 116,420 119,924 123,544 127,278 Projected Personnel Costs (84,712) (83,810) (85,988) (88,549) (90,786) Projected Operating Costs (28,425) (26,048) (26,592) (27,458) (28,797) Projected Operating Costs (7,200) (7,416) (7,638) (7,867) (8,103) Projected Debt Service (1,314) (1,313) (1,310) (1,309) (1,311) Projected Savings 1,969 1,893 1,938 1,996 2,073
Net Projected Expenditures (119,682) (116,693) (119,590) (123,187) (126,925) Projected Ending Cash 11,942 11,669 12,003 12,360 12,713 Projections toward Council Objectives
Ending Cash as Percentage of
Expenditures 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Projected Personnel Percentage 69.6% 70.7% 70.8% 70.7% 70.4% Fiscal Year
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ending 2022 & 2023
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) Amended Amended
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
Sales Tax 31,983 33,207 34,037 34,888 35,760 36,654
Property Tax 23,961 25,339 26,099 26,882 27,689 28,519
TOT 7,241 7,530 7,831 8,144 8,470 8,808
Cannabis Tax 1,888 1,888 1,964 2,042 2,124 2,209
Other Taxes 2,474 2,500 2,600 2,704 2,812 2,924
Licenses & Permits 2,214 2,414 2,510 2,611 2,715 2,824
Fines & Penalties 545 545 566 589 612 637
Other Government 14,436 1,052 1,083 1,116 1,149 1,184
Redding Rancheria 120 122 126 129 133 137
Internal Departments 11,970 12,935 13,323 13,723 14,135 14,559 Service Charges 3,026 3,166 3,293 3,425 3,562 3,704
Other Revenue 2,463 2,704 2,486 2,560 2,637 2,716
Use of Money & Property 583 585 585 585 585 585
Interest 118 118 227 215 213 197
Subtotal 94,104 103,021 96,730 99,612 102,596 105,658
Transfers In:

Gas Taxes 7,705 10,317 7,971 8,210 8,457 8,710
Debt Service 34 34 34 34 - -
Other Transfers In 317 316 326 335 345 356
Total Transfers In 10,667 8,056 8,331 8,579 8,802 9,066 Transfers Out:

CVB & Convention Center (1,032) (1,080) (1,113) (1,146) (1,180) (1,216) Parking - - - - - -
Library (934) (962) (991) (1,021) (1,052) (1,083)
Rolling Stock (1,761) (1,530) (1,526) (1,472) (1,516) (1,562) Other Equipment (336) (111) (115) (118) (122) (125)
Internal Advances - - (898) (886) (913) (940)
Other Transfers Out (1,075) (650) (20) (1) (0) (0)
Total Transfers Out (4,334) (5,139) (4,662) (4,644) (4,782) (4,926) Net Transfers 6,332 2,917 3,668 3,936 4,020 4,140
Total Revenues 105,938 100,437 100,398 103,548 106,615 109,798 Revenue Assumptions
Sales Tax 4.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
Property Tax 5.0% 6.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Fee Revenues Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Other Government Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Other Revenue Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Internal Departments Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% All Revenues (Not specific) Projected Projected 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Interest (Percent of Cash) 2.0% 2.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Fiscal Year Ended
Revenues
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ending 2022 & 2023
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32
Sales Tax 37,570 38,510 39,472 40,459 41,471
Property Tax 29,375 30,256 31,164 32,099 33,062
TOT 9,161 9,527 9,908 10,305 10,717
Cannabis Tax 2,297 2,389 2,485 2,584 2,687
Other Taxes 3,041 3,163 3,289 3,421 3,558
Licenses & Permits 2,936 3,054 3,176 3,303 3,435
Fines & Penalties 662 689 717 745 775
Other Government 1,219 1,256 1,294 1,333 1,373
Redding Rancheria 141 146 150 154 159
Internal Departments 14,995 15,445 15,909 16,386 16,877 Service Charges 3,853 4,007 4,167 4,334 4,507
Other Revenue 2,798 2,881 2,968 3,057 3,149
Use of Money & Property 585 585 585 585 585
Interest 185 119 117 120 124
Subtotal 108,820 112,027 115,400 118,885 122,478
Transfers In:

Gas Taxes 8,972 9,241 9,518 9,804 10,098
Debt Service - - - - -
Other Transfers In 366 377 389 400 412
Total Transfers In 9,338 9,618 9,907 10,204 10,510
Transfers Out:

CVB & Convention Center (1,252) (1,290) (1,328) (1,368) (1,409) Parking - - - - -
Library (1,116) (1,149) (1,184) (1,219) (1,256)
Rolling Stock (1,608) (1,657) (1,706) (1,758) (1,810)
Other Equipment (129) (133) (137) (141) (145)
Internal Advances (968) (997) (1,027) (1,058) (1,090)
Other Transfers Out (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Total Transfers Out (5,074) (5,226) (5,383) (5,544) (5,710) Net Transfers 4,392 4,264 4,524 4,660 4,800
Total Revenues 113,085 116,420 119,924 123,544 127,278
Revenue Assumptions
Sales Tax 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
Property Tax 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Fee Revenues 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Other Government 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Other Revenue 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Internal Departments 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
All Revenues (Not specific) 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Interest (Percent of Cash) 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
Fiscal Year Ended
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Revenues
Fiscal Year Ending 2022 & 2023
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) Amended Amended
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
Safety UAL Payments 10,054 10,137 10,001 9,851
Misc UAL Payments 3,873 3,869 3,389 3,314
PARS UAL Payments 2,535 1,453 172 172
Police
Personnel 30,243 32,911 26,742 28,261 29,977 30,756
Operating 6,201 6,223 6,764 6,967 7,176 7,391
Capital Outlay/Project 3,420 68 70 72 74 77
Subtotal 39,202 39,864 33,576 35,300 37,227 38,223
Fire
Personnel 19,249 19,988 16,844 17,289 19,996 20,515
Operating 4,307 4,561 4,294 4,422 4,555 4,692
Capital Outlay/Project 515 250 258 265 1,218 2,310
Subtotal 24,798 24,070 21,395 21,976 25,769 27,516
Transportation & Engineering
Personnel 2,541 2,821 1,485 1,615 1,632 1,669
Operating 3,367 3,444 3,433 3,536 3,642 3,752
Capital Outlay/Project 5,723 7,028 4,504 4,639 4,778 4,922 Subtotal 13,293 11,631 9,422 9,790 10,053 10,343
Parks & Recreation
Personnel 4,005 4,317 3,955 4,114 4,223 4,339
Operating 2,552 2,626 2,577 2,655 2,734 2,816
Capital Outlay/Project 5,765 224 230 237 244 252
Subtotal 7,167 12,322 6,763 7,006 7,202 7,407
Development Services
Personnel 4,484 4,956 3,851 3,996 4,088 4,197
Operating 1,473 1,055 1,027 1,058 1,089 1,122
Capital Outlay/Project 758 300 309 318 328 338
Subtotal 6,312 6,716 5,187 5,372 5,505 5,656
General Government & Other
Personnel 4,638 4,836 3,936 4,079 4,170 4,279
Operating 3,538 3,613 3,296 3,395 3,496 3,601
Capital Outlay/Project 6,098 674 1,044 975 1,004 1,034
Debt Service 2,630 2,613 2,118 1,957 1,965 1,318
Subtotal 11,735 16,904 10,394 10,406 10,635 10,232
Add Back Personnel - - - - - -
Add Back O&M - - - - - -
Projected Savings (2,023) (1,792) (1,533) (1,594) (1,719) (1,787) Total Expenditures 109,484 100,715 101,664 103,716 108,233 110,929 Expenditure Assumptions
Personnel - Wages Budget Budget 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% O&M & Capital Outlay Budget Budget 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Debt Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual
Assumed Expense Savings 0.020 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Fiscal Year Ending 2022 & 2023
Fiscal Year Ended
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Expenditures
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023) 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32
Safety UAL Payments 9,590 9,920 10,261 10,610 10,425
Misc UAL Payments 3,162 3,272 3,385 3,502 3,338
PARS UAL Payments 172 172 172 172 172
Police
Personnel 31,538 32,358 33,257 34,185 35,136
Operating 7,613 7,841 8,077 8,319 8,568
Capital Outlay/Project 79 81 84 86 89
Subtotal 40,280 39,230 41,418 42,590 43,794
Fire
Personnel 21,035 21,581 22,183 22,802 23,439
Operating 4,833 4,978 5,127 5,281 5,439
Capital Outlay/Project 379 390 402 414 427
Subtotal 26,949 26,247 27,712 28,497 29,304
Transportation & Engineering
Personnel 1,707 1,746 1,792 1,846 1,896
Operating 3,864 3,980 4,099 4,222 4,349
Capital Outlay/Project 5,069 5,221 5,378 5,539 5,706
Subtotal 10,947 10,640 11,270 11,607 11,951
Parks & Recreation
Personnel 4,460 4,583 4,714 4,850 4,989
Operating 2,901 2,988 3,078 3,170 3,265
Capital Outlay/Project 259 267 275 283 292
Subtotal 7,838 7,620 8,067 8,303 8,546
Development Services
Personnel 4,308 4,423 4,545 4,673 4,802
Operating 1,156 1,190 1,226 1,263 1,301
Capital Outlay/Project 348 358 369 380 391
Subtotal 5,971 5,812 6,140 6,315 6,494
General Government & Other
Personnel 4,391 4,505 4,629 4,760 4,891
Operating 3,709 3,821 3,935 4,053 4,175
Capital Outlay/Project 1,065 1,097 1,130 1,164 1,199
Debt Service 1,314 1,313 1,310 1,309 1,311
Subtotal 10,737 10,480 11,004 11,286 11,576
Add Back Personnel 4,350 1,250 1,050 1,150 1,700
Add Back O&M 4,350 1,250 1,050 1,150 1,700
Projected Savings (1,969) (1,893) (1,938) (1,996) (2,073) Total Expenditures 119,682 116,693 119,590 123,187 126,925 Expenditure Assumptions
Personnel - Wages 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 2.75%
O&M & Capital Outlay 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Debt Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual
Assumed Expense Savings 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Fiscal Year Ending 2022 & 2023
Fiscal Year Ended
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Expenditures
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Quarterly Report March 2023 (9.10(a)--General Fund Financial Report for quarter ended March 2023)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the City of Redding Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report and Implementation of Scenario 2; and find that the action is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies.

Fiscal Impact
There are no direct funding impacts in accepting the Stormwater Trash Control Measures CostBenefit Evaluation Report (Report). If accepted, the cost estimates for trash control strategies and infrastructure identified in the Report will be used for future planning and budgeting purposes. While planning is ongoing, the cost of the planning effort to date is approximately $158,750 and has been funded by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Fixed Fee.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to accept the Report, and provide alternate direction to staff. It will be challenging for staff to proceed with planning, funding, and implementing future trash control improvements in the City of Redding (City) without acceptance of the Report.

Background/Analysis
In response to the growing challenges with trash levels in creeks, rivers, lakes, and shorelines, the California State Water Board adopted the Trash Amendments (Amendments) in 2015. This action amended two statewide water quality control plans to include trash control requirements for owners or operators of municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s).

MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Consider the City of Redding Stormwater Trash Control Measures CostBenefit Evaluation Report.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 313
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report Page 2
Consistent with the Amendments, the City was required to reduce the amount of trash discharged from its MS4, beginning in 2020. The City must demonstrate 100 percent capture, or equivalent, of all trash five millimeters in size or greater by December 2, 2030. Interim trash reduction milestones and milestone dates will be implemented through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II Small MS4 General Permit (MS4 Permit) that will be issued to the City and other public agencies in California, or directed through other regulatory orders.

The Amendments designate land areas where local agencies will need to implement the new stormwater trash control measures. The designated land areas are based on currently developed land uses that are presumed to generate high levels of trash. These areas are referred to as Priority Land Uses (PLUs). The PLUs include high density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed urban, and public transportation stations that are connected to the City’s storm water system.

To initiate trash control measure implementation planning, the State Water Board issued an order to Phase II permittees in June 2017 requesting that each public agency choose its compliance strategy for addressing the Amendments. Track 1 requires the local agency to install, operate, and maintain State Water Board certified and approved trash full capture systems in the storm drain system that drains all PLUs. Track 2 allows for a combination of full capture systems, multi-benefit projects, institutional controls, and/or other treatment controls to achieve full capture system equivalency. The City notified the State Water Board of its intention to implement the Track 2 compliance approach.

To date, the City’s PLUs have been identified, and a draft Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan and the Report have been prepared. The Report informs the selection of trash controls to address Amendment requirements mandated by the State Water Board. The purpose of the evaluation was to identify viable trash controls and preliminary planning-level cost estimates for implementing these controls. Eight potential new or enhanced trash control measures and four trash control measure implementation strategies were evaluated by comparing base/initial, annual/ongoing, 50-year life cycle costs, and the estimated maximum trash management benefits. The four implementation strategies include:
• Scenario 1 – Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) and 368 catch basin inserts (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that do not drain to full capture systems. • Scenario 2 – Installation & operation of 655 catch basin inserts (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that do not drain to full capture systems.
• Scenario 3 - Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) trash full capture systems; installation and maintenance of 312 (partial-capture) curb-inlet screens; implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that do not drain to full capture systems; and the expansion of on-land trash cleanup programs. • Scenario 4 – Implementation of six (6) types of trash source control measures and no highflow capacity (large) or catch basin insert (small) trash full capture systems.

Packet Pg. 314
Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report Page 3
After reviewing the four implementation strategies, the Public Works Department (Public Works) chose Scenario 2 for pilot implementation in the Fiscal Year 2023-24. This scenario provides the lowest life-cycle costs, realistic short-term implementation tasks, and a high confidence of meeting the compliance objectives. To fund the pilot implementation, Public Works will request allocation of resources through the budget cycle that will be adopted in June.

When the City’s new MS4 Permit is issued, the State Water Board will require the City to prepare and submit a final Trash Capture Implementation Plan (Plan). The Plan will outline the implementation strategy the City will employ to meet the required trash reduction milestones.

The next step includes bringing the pilot implementation results and the draft Plan to the Council for review and approval. Staff recommends the Council accept the Report as it will support the preparation of the final Plan.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the activity and determined that the action is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies. A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration but does require consideration of environmental factors. Acceptance of the Report would not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. No further action is required at this time.

Implementation of any of the four strategies would require separate review under CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Notice of Exemption
Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 Packet Pg. 315
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report)

STORMWATER TRASH CONTROL

MEASURES COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION
Complying with the Statewide Trash Amendments

Final Draft
Prepared for:

Prepared by:

1410 Jackson Street
Oakland, CA 94602
March 2023
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 ii
Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1

1.1 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 1

2. POTENTIAL NEW OR ENHANCED TRASH CONTROL MEASURES ................................. 5

2.1 LARGE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS ................................................................................................ 6

2.2 SMALL TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS.............................................................................................. 10

2.3 TRASH INSPECTIONS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES..................................................................................... 14

2.4 CURB-INLET SCREENS ON INLETS IN THE PUBLIC ROW ......................................................................... 19

2.5 EXPANDED ON-LAND CLEANUPS....................................................................................................... 22

2.6 ENHANCED PUBLIC CONTAINER/BIN MANAGEMENT............................................................................ 25

2.7 ENHANCED CITY-WIDE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAM................................................... 27

2.8 MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE – SINGLE-USE PLASTIC FOOD SERVICE WARE .................................................... 29

2.9 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL NEW OR ENHANCED SOURCE CONTROLS ........................................................ 31

3. TRASH CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS ................................... 32

3.1 SCENARIO 1: TRASH FULL CAPTURE - LARGE AND SMALL SYSTEMS ......................................................... 33

3.2 SCENARIO 2: TRASH FULL CAPTURE - SMALL SYSTEMS ......................................................................... 33

3.3 SCENARIO 3: LARGE FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS & MULTIPLE INSTITUTIONAL AND SOURCE CONTROLS............. 34

3.4 SCENARIO 4: ONLY INSTITUTIONAL AND SOURCE CONTROLS ................................................................. 35

3.5 COMPARISON OF TRASH CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS............................................ 36

4. 10-YEAR TRASH CONTROL MEASURE ACTION PLAN ........................................... 36

5. REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 41

Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 iii
Executive Summary
On April 7, 2015, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) adopted amendments to two statewide water quality control plans to include trash control requirements for owners or operators of Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), including those regulated through the California Statewide Phase II NPDES General Permit. These amendments require MS4 owners and operators to address trash generated in Priority Land Use (PLU) areas and discharged to local water bodies from their MS4s. The State Water Board allows for two approaches to address the trash generated in PLU areas: 1) install certified trash full capture systems into the MS4; or 2) implement other trash controls to manage trash at a level equivalent to full capture systems. The deadline for MS4 owners and operators to address trash in all PLU areas is December 2030.

To inform the selection of trash controls to address the stormwater trash management requirements mandated by the State Water Board, the City of Redding (City) conducted a Trash Control Measures Evaluation. The primary purpose of the evaluation was to identify viable trash controls and preliminary planning-level cost estimates for implementing these controls to reduce trash in stormwater discharges.

Eight (8) potential new or enhanced trash control measures and four (4) trash control measure implementation scenarios (e.g., combinations of trash control measures) were evaluated by comparing base/initial, annual/ongoing, and 50-year life cycle costs, and the estimated maximum trash management benefits. Trash control measures evaluated include catch basin insert and high-flow capacity types of trash full capture systems, trash inspections on private properties, curb-inlet screens on inlets in the public right-of-way, expanded on-land cleanups, enhanced public container/bin management, enhanced city-wide public education and outreach, and the adoption/enforcement of a new municipal ordinance to reduce the distribution of single-use plastic food service ware at local eating establishments. The four (4) implementation scenarios designed to achieve the goal of the trash amendments include the following:
• Scenario 1 – Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) and 368 catch basin insert (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that don’t drain to full capture systems. • Scenario 2 – Installation & operation of 655 catch basin inserts (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that don’t drain to full capture systems.
• Scenario 3 - Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) trash full capture systems; installation and maintenance of 312 (partial-capture) curb-inlet screens; implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that don’t drain to full capture systems; and the expansion of on-land trash cleanup programs. • Scenario 4 – Implementation of six (6) types of trash source control measures and no high-flow capacity (large) or catch basin insert (small) trash full capture systems.

Based on discussions with City staff, a preliminary draft eight-year trash control measure action plan was developed that includes trash control measures described in scenario 1, which was identified as the most cost-effective control measure scenario of those evaluated. Trash control measure scenario 1 provides the highest level of confidence in achieving the mandated stormwater trash management goals established by the State Water Board. The eight-year action plan includes preliminary City staff resource needs and cost estimates for implementing capital/initial and annual/ongoing tasks and serves as a draft road map for addressing these stormwater trash management goals by the December 2030 deadline.

Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 iv
Figures
FIGURE 1. PRIORITY LAND USE (PLU) AREAS AND TRASH MANAGEMENT AREAS (TMAS) IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF REDDING AS GENERATING MODERATE OR HIGH TRASH LEVELS.................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 2. OVERVIEW OF THE LOCATIONS AND CATCHMENTS FOR FOUR HIGH PRIORITY POTENTIAL LARGE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS IN THE CITY OF REDDING........................................................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 3. OVERVIEW OF THE LOCATIONS OF 655 POTENTIAL SMALL TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS IN THE CITY OF REDDING, AS IDENTIFIED IN THE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY EVALUATION (SEE APPENDIX B). .................................................................. 12 FIGURE 4. OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTIES THAT GENERATE BASELINE MODERATE, HIGH OR VERY HIGH TRASH LEVELS AND THEREFORE

WOULD BE POTENTIALLY SUBJECT TO IMPLEMENTING NEW ENHANCED TRASH CONTROLS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 5. OVERVIEW OF THE LOCATIONS FOR 312 POTENTIAL CURB-INLET SCREENS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................... 20 Tables
TABLE 1. CITY OF REDDING BASELINE TRASH GENERATION LEVELS FOR PLU AND NON-PLU AREAS......................................................... 2 TABLE 2. CITY OF REDDING PRIORITY LAND USE (PLU) ACRES IN EACH BASELINE TRASH GENERATION CATEGORY...................................... 4 TABLE 3. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR THE PLANNING, INSTALLATION, AND OPERATION OF LARGE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ............................................................................................ 9 TABLE 4. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR THE PLANNING, INSTALLATION, AND OPERATION OF SMALL TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS AT 655 LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ........................................................................................... 13 TABLE 5. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR CREATING AND IMPLEMENTING A TRASH INSPECTION PROGRAM TO ADDRESS TRASH LEVELS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ........................................................................................... 16 TABLE 6. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING 312 CURB-INLET SCREENS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21 TABLE 7. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR EXPANDED ON-LAND CLEANUPS IN THE CITY OF REDDING...................... 23 TABLE 8. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR ENHANCING PUBLIC CONTAINER/BIN MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 TABLE 9. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR AN ENHANCED CITY-WIDE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ................................................................................................................................................. 28 TABLE 10. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR ADOPTING AND IMPLEMENTING A SINGLE-USE PLASTIC FOOD SERVICE WARE ORDINANCE.......................................................................................................................................................... 30 TABLE 11. SUMMARY OF THE PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATE AND TRASH REDUCTION BENEFITS OF IMPLEMENTING POTENTIAL NEW OR ENHANCED TRASH CONTROL MEASURES.................................................................................................................. 31 TABLE 12. IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS FOR NEW/ENHANCED TRASH CONTROL MEASURES DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL OF THE TRASH AMENDMENTS (I.E., FULL CAPTURE OR EQUIVALENT IN ALL PLU AREAS) IN THE CITY OF REDDING............................................... 32 TABLE 13. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 1. ............................................................. 33 TABLE 14. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 2. ............................................................. 33 TABLE 15. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 3. ............................................................. 34 TABLE 16. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 4. ............................................................. 35 TABLE 17. SUMMARY TABLE OF PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR TRASH CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE THE TRASH REDUCTION GOAL MANDATED BY THE STATEWIDE TRASH AMENDMENTS.................. 36 TABLE 18. SUMMARY OF TASKS IN 10-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF REDDING........................................................................ 38 TABLE 19. ESTIMATED CITY OF REDDING CONSULTANT/CAPITAL COSTS AND STAFFING RESOURCE NEEDS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE 10-YEAR ACTION PLAN................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Appendices
A – CITY OF REDDING BASELINE TRASH GENERATION MAPS AND TRASH MANAGEMENT AREAS (TMAS)

B - TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY EVALUATION - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 v
List of Abbreviations

BASMAA BAY AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCIES ASSOCIATION

BIDS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS

CALTRANS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

CPSS CONNECTOR PIPE SCREENS

FY FISCAL YEAR

GIS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM

GSRD GROSS SOLIDS REMOVAL SYSTEMS

HDS HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR

MRP MUNICIPAL REGIONAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER

NPDES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM

NSBB/DSBB NUTRIENT SEPARATING BAFFLE BOXES

O&M OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

OVTAS ON-LAND VISUAL ASSESSMENTS

ROW PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

SFBRWQCB SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

TMAS TRASH MANAGEMENT AREAS
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 1

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose
This memorandum serves as the final deliverable of the Trash Control Measure Planning Project being conducted by EOA, Inc. (EOA) for the City of Redding (City). The goal of this project is to identify the costs and benefits of a range of trash control measures that have shown to be effective in reducing trash in municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). If implemented, these controls would assist the City in reducing trash discharged from its MS4 and help address the trash reduction goal mandated by the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Trash Amendments. The Trash Amendments state that each applicable MS4 in California must effectively reduce trash in stormwater discharges by the year 2030. This memorandum is the culmination of previous tasks conducted as part of the Trash Control Measure Planning Project for the City and summarizes the results of all previous task deliverables, which are included as appendices (e.g., Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation).

1.2 Background
The City is subject to requirements of the Trash Amendments adopted by the State Water Board in 2015.

The Trash Amendments were added to the statewide Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries (ISWEBE), which effectively serves as the water quality control plan for inland surface water throughout California. Section 2.2 of the ISWEBE states:
“Trash shall not be present in inland surface waters, enclosed bays, estuaries, and along shorelines or adjacent areas in amounts that adversely affect beneficial uses or cause nuisance.” The Trash Amendments also require MS4s to effectively reduce trash from their discharges by implementing: 1) Track 1 - trash full capture systems1 certified by the State Water Board in their MS4; or 2) Track 2 - combinations of trash control measures that are equivalent to full capture systems (i.e., full capture system equivalency). Implementation has to occur in predefined trash generating areas called Priority Land Use (PLU) areas.2 As described in its Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan (City of Redding 2018), the City has decided to implement the “Track 2” compliance approach to reduce trash in PLU areas, which is defined in Section 2.1 of the Trash Amendments as the:
“The implementation of a plan with a combination of full capture systems, multi-benefit projects, institutional controls, and/or other treatment controls to achieve full capture system equivalency.” To assist in implementing the Track 2 approach, the City established baseline trash generation levels for all PLU areas draining to its MS4 by conducting On-land Visual Trash Assessments (OVTAs). Trash

1 Full Capture Systems are those that trap all particles that are 5 millimeter (mm) or greater and have a design treatment capacity that is either: a) not less than the peak flow rate resulting from a one-year, one-hour storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized and designed to carry at least the same flows as the corresponding storm drain. The 5-mm size limit corresponds with the diameter of a cigarette butt. Over 40 types of full capture systems have been certified by the State Water Board to-date. 2 Priority land uses are defined as those developed sites, facilities, or land uses (i.e., not simply zoned land uses) within the MS4 permittee’s jurisdiction from which discharges of trash are regulated by these trash provisions as follows: (1) High-Density Residential: all land uses with at least ten (10) developed dwelling units/acre; (2) Industrial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve product manufacture, storage, or distribution (e.g., manufacturing businesses, warehouses, equipment storage lots, junkyards, wholesale businesses, distribution centers, or building material sales yards); (3) Commercial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve the sale or transfer of goods or services to consumers (e.g., business or professional buildings, shops, restaurants, theaters, vehicle repair shops, etc.); (4) Mixed Urban: land uses where high-density residential, industrial, and/or commercial land uses predominate collectively (i.e., are intermixed). (5) Public Transportation Stations: facilities or sites where public transit agencies’ vehicles load or unload passengers or goods (e.g., bus stations and stops).

Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 2
generation categories (low, moderate, high and very high) were assigned to PLU areas based on the results of these assessments, which were conducted on a combination of PLU areas and public right-ofway (ROW) areas adjacent to the PLU areas. This memorandum reflects the results of assessments conducted in 2017/2018 and 2020/2021.

As described in the City’s Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan), those PLU areas identified as generating low levels of trash (i.e., a consistent OVTA score of “A”), have achieved the trash full capture system equivalency (FSCE) standard established by the Trash Amendments. PLU areas that generate moderate, high and very high baseline trash generation levels that need additional reduction are depicted on the City’s baseline trash generation map (Figure 1), which reflects the results of reassessments conducted in 2020/2021. Higher resolution baseline generation maps are included in Appendix A. Baseline acreage and the relative (%) annual trash loading from each PLU category are summarized in Table 1. Details on the methods used to derive annual trash loading are included in the City’s Implementation Plan.

Table 1. City of Redding baseline trash generation levels for PLU and Non-PLU areas.

Land Use
PLU Area Trash Generation Category (acres)
Total
Low Moderate High Very High Unknown a
Commercial 457 586 507 -- -- 1,550
High Density Residential 270 206 127 -- -- 603
Industrial 287 173 105 -- -- 565
Mixed Urban -- -- -- -- -- --
Public Transportation Stationsb < 0.1 2 5 -- < 0.1 7
Totals 1014 967 744 0 < 0.1 2,725

% of Baseline Trash Generation (PLU Areas)c
Total
Low Moderate High Very High Unknown a
Commercial 0.0% 14.9% 51.4% -- -- 66.3%
High Density Residential 0.0% 5.2% 12.9% -- -- 18.1%
Industrial 0.0% 4.4% 10.6% -- -- 15.0%
Mixed Urban -- -- -- -- -- --
Public Transportation Stationsb < 0.1% < 0.1% 0.5% -- < 0.1% 0.6% Totals 0.0% 24.5% 75.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
a Unknown areas refers to areas not assigned a baseline trash generation category. These areas include bus stops that were not assessed and CalTrans jurisdictional areas.
b Public transportation stations are bus stops, which are assumed to each be 200 ft2 on average. c Trash generation is based on the volume of trash generated per acre of land. Generation rates differ between moderate, high and very high areas. For additional information, see the City’s Implementation Plan.

To allow for a more geographically refined approach to tracking trash control measure implementation and associated trash reductions over time, the City was subdivided into Trash Management Areas (TMAs).

The City’s TMA boundaries are also illustrated on Figure 1 and trash generation levels for each TMA are provided in Table 2.

Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 3

Figure 1. Priority Land Use (PLU) areas and Trash Management Areas (TMAs) identified by the City of Redding as generating moderate or high trash levels.

Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 4
Table 2. City of Redding Priority Land Use (PLU) acres in each baseline trash generation category.

Trash Management
Area (TMA)
PLU Area Trash Generation (acres)
% of Baseline
Trash in
all PLU Areas
Non-PLU Areas
(acres)
Total Area
(PLU and Non-PLU)
Low Moderate High Subtotal
TMA01 108 201 131 440 19.4% 1,223 1,663
TMA02 46 15 19 80 2.0% 434 514
TMA03 61 127 265 453 22.9% 306 759
TMA04 67 149 68 284 12.7% 145 429
TMA05 69 37 50 156 5.1% 405 561
TMA06 56 70 63 189 7.8% 664 853
TMA07 142 226 64 432 17.0% 1,361 1,793
TMA08 67 98 54 219 8.9% 1,344 1,563
TMA09 20 9 -- 29 0.5% 435 464
TMA10 167 4 24 195 1.6% 436 631
TMA11 10 6 -- 16 0.4% 198 214
TMA12 1 1 -- 2 0.1% 156 158
TMA13 40 4 1 45 0.3% 113 158
TMA14 66 7 -- 73 0.4% 1,200 1,273
TMA15 94 13 5 112 1.1% 27,804 27,916
Totals 1,014 967 744 2,725 100.0% 36,221 38,946

Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 5
Types of New or Enhanced Trash Control Measures Evaluated While the City currently implements a number of trash control measures that aid in managing trash levels in its MS4, because baseline levels in PLU areas have not yet achieved a consistent low trash generation level (i.e., full capture equivalent) as depicted on the City’s baseline map, the City is required to implement new or enhanced measures to reach the mandated stormwater trash management goal by 2030, as established by the Trash Amendments. After conducting: 1) a survey of City staff to document existing trash controls and interest in different types of enhance control measures; 2) field visits to identify primary/dominant trash sources; and 3) a Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Analysis (see Appendix B) to identify the most cost-effective full capture approaches to address trash in the City, potential trash reduction strategies that the City should consider implementing have been identified and are the focus of this cost-benefit evaluation. These strategies are further described later in this document, but include the following types of trash control measures:
• Large Trash Full Capture Systems
• Small Trash Full Capture Systems
• Trash Inspections on Private Properties
• Curb-inlet screens on Inlets in the Public ROW (with existing street sweeping) • Expanded On-Land Cleanups
• Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management
• Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and Outreach
• Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Each of these trash control measures is described and the estimated costs and trash reduction benefits associated with each is provided.

2. Potential New or Enhanced Trash Control Measures
This section describes each potential new or enhanced trash control measure evaluated. The extent to which the City has implemented the control measure to-date, the potential future implementation of the control measure, the estimated trash reduction benefits of existing and new/enhanced trash control measure implementation, and the estimated costs of implementing the new/enhanced control measure (as described) are summarized in this section. Please note the following:
• The trash reduction benefits associated with potential new/enhanced controls that are summarized in this section should be considered preliminary estimates, as they are based on a combination of the City’s baseline trash generation map and best professional judgement based on the current understanding of the effectiveness of each control measure. • Cost estimates included in this section and in Section 3 should be considered preliminary planning-level estimates and may not include all costs associated with the design, planning, purchase, construction/installation, implementation, and operation and maintenance associated with the control measure. Assumptions associated with estimating the costs for each control measure are described.
• Costs estimates presented are based on the most readily available information at the time that this evaluation was conducted, including staffing rates (fully burdened) that were provided by the Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 6
City. Comparisons of base/initial costs (e.g., design, planning, purchasing, and constructing/installing), annual ongoing costs (e.g., implementation and operation/maintenance and replacement for full capture systems), and 50-year life cycle costs were developed using this information to assist the City in evaluating the most cost-effective approaches to achieving mandated trash load reductions. More detailed cost estimates will likely be needed should the City decide to move forward with the implementation of one or more of the control measures evaluated.

2.1 Large Trash Full Capture Systems
Large trash full capture systems are devices that can address trash from an entire stormwater catchment area (including storm drains on private property). These systems provide a single location for maintenance, potentially reducing operation and maintenance costs over time. Two disadvantages of large systems are the relatively high capital and construction costs, which require a large initial funding source, and the higher instance of subsurface utility conflicts at desired locations within highly urbanized areas. Additionally, large systems installed in open channels may be infeasible due to wildlife habitat concerns or at a minimum require environmental permitting, which may increase planning costs.

There are four general types of large trash full capture systems - hydrodynamic separators, gross solids removal systems, baffle boxes, and netting systems. The selection of a large system will depend on the characteristics of a specific location to allow for construction and maintenance, the extent of hydraulic impacts caused by the system, the potential for environmental permitting, and the magnitude trash load reduction that the system will achieve. Additional information on the types of large full capture systems can be found in the City’s Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation (Full Capture Evaluation), which is included as Appendix B.

Maintenance of most types of large full capture systems is generally performed using a vacuum-assisted (i.e., vactor) truck. For netting systems, nets are removed via a crane or truck with a hydraulic boom, and replaced accordingly. At a minimum, maintenance is performed at least once per year to ensure that the device consistently maintains the full capture standard. Manufacture recommended maintenance frequencies (if available) should followed so that the device is operating as designed during all storm events.

Existing and Planned Large Trash Full Capture Systems
No large trash full capture systems are currently known to exist in the City. At the time this evaluation was conducted, the City did not have concrete plans to install one or more large trash full capture systems.

Potential Large Trash Full Capture Systems
In the Full Capture Evaluation (Appendix B), all stormwater catchments in the City were evaluated via a desktop analysis for the feasibility of installing large trash full capture systems. Trash reduction benefits and preliminary costs for installing/constructing and maintaining/operating large full capture systems were evaluated for thirty (30) potential locations. Based on the estimated costs and trash reduction benefits, three locations (i.e., FTC01C-1, FTC01C-3, and FTC04E) were identified as high priority sites and it was recommended that the City further evaluate the feasibility of implementing large capture systems.

Through further discussion with City staff on the feasibility of implementing large full capture systems at the three sites, two of the three sites (i.e., FTC01C-3 and FTC04E) were included in this broader control measures evaluation. The other site (i.e., FTC01C-1) was not further considered due to site-specific complexities and feasibility issues identified by the City. Two additional sites (i.e., FTC01B and FTC03A-1), Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 7
however, were also included in this broader control measures evaluation based on input from the City.

The locations and catchments for the four sites evaluated in this broader control measures evaluation for large full capture systems are included in Figure 2. Should large capture systems be installed at these four, the City would achieve an estimated 39% trash reduction from PLU areas.

Based on the desktop analysis and preliminary field work conducted at the four sites, netting systems appear to be the most optimal type of large trash full capture system for open channel locations (i.e., FTC01C-3 and FTC04E) and baffle boxes are the most optimal type of system for locations where the installation would occur underground (i.e., FTC01B and FTC01C-3). Examples of these systems are included in the images below. Additional details on each of these types of systems are included in Appendix B.

Cost Estimates
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning, design, installation, and operation of the four large trash capture systems are presented in Table 3. Additional detail regarding locations, types and assumptions associated with these potential large trash full capture systems are included in Appendix B.

Example Baffle Box System
Bioclean Debris Separating Baffle Box System
(www.biocleanenvironmental.com)
Example Netting System
StormTrap - TrashTrap
(www.stormtrap.com)
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 8
Figure 2. Overview of the locations and catchments for four high priority potential large trash full capture systems in the City of Redding.

FTC01C-3
FTC04E
FTC01B
FTC03A-1
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 9
Table 3. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for the planning, installation, and operation of large trash full capture systems at four locations in the City of Redding.

Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Estimated
Staffing
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours
Portion
of FTEa
Capital costs of system
design, installation,
construction, and
contingency
All four potential
large full capture
system catchment
locations (i.e., sites
FTC01B, FTC01C-3,
FTC03A-1, and
FTC04E).

Contractor constructs/installs systems
at four locations (FTC01B, FTC01C-3,
FTC03A-1, and FTC04E) identified as
highest priority by City staff. A total of
two (2) in-line netting and two (2) baffle
box systems.

NA -- -- -- $4,322,000 -- -- -- --
City develops concept
and releases bid/RFP for
large full capture systems
at all large device
locations listed in the Full
Trash Capture Evaluation
and manages
construction contract.

Based on feasibility evaluation, City staff
has enough information to develop and
release bid package for design/build of
the systems. City staff assist with design
of system.

City Project Coordinator staff time only
needed for the first two (2) years (i.e.,
Base/Initial Tasks). No on-going costs
associated with this task.

City Project CoordinatorStorm Drains 1500 0.75 $260,900 $195,675 -- -- -- -- City Storm Drain Utility
Supervisor 40 0.02 $168,700 $3,374 -- -- -- --
City develops standard
operating procedure for
maintenance of large
system.

City Storm Drain Supervisor with
assistance from City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker develops standard
operating procedure for maintenance of
large system and conducts initial
training of field staff.

City Storm Drain Utility
Supervisor 400 0.2 $168,700 $33,740 -- -- -- --
City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker 120 0.06 $103,240 $6,194 -- -- -- -- City operates and
maintains system
One (1) maintenance event each year
per baffle box system; Four (4)
maintenance events each year per
netting system. One (1) vactor truck
operator and three (3) maintenance
staff per maintenance event. A total of
seven (7) hours per event
City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker -- -- -- -- 378 0.19 $103,240 $19,512 City Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker -
Temporary
-- -- -- -- 756 0.38 $36,100 $13,646
Vactor Truck Operator -- -- -- -- 378 0.19 $103,240 $19,512 Overhead Costs Oversight of all tasks above City Assistant Director of Public Works 20 0.01 $330,380 $3,304 40 0.02 $330,380 $6,608 Totals 2080 1.04 -- $4,564,287 1552 0.78 -- $59,278
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.

Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 10

2.2 Small Trash Full Capture Systems
Screening systems that are installed in stormwater catch basins (or drop inlets) are commonly known as catch basin inserts (CBIs). CBIs are placed inside a catch basin to prevent trash, organic material (e.g. leaves and twigs), and sediment from entering the storm drain outflow pipe within the catch basin. There are two general designs of CBIs, surface inlet baskets/screens and outlet screens. Surface inlet baskets/screens are attached to the side
walls or lip of the catch basin, while
outlet screens are placed in the catch
basin in front of the outlet pipe. An
illustration of an outlet screen is
provided to the right. A wide variety of
CBI designs exist, mostly in the form of
outlet screens (e.g., connector pipe
screens). CBIs that use filtering walls or
filter media are not applicable for
trapping trash and do not meet the
trash full capture standard. As a result,
the term “insert” is not necessarily
synonymous with trash full capture.

Maintenance of CBIs is performed using
a vacuum-assisted (i.e., vactor) truck or
manually with a shovel or clamshell. At a minimum, maintenance is performed at least once per year to ensure that the device consistently maintains the full capture standard. If the device is observed to have a plugged or blinded screen or is greater than 50 percent full during a maintenance event, the maintenance frequency should be increased so that the device is neither plugged nor more than half full at the next maintenance event.

Existing Small Full Capture Systems
At the time this evaluation was conducted, two small full capture systems were installed in storm drain inlets located in the City of Redding. These devices were installed in new developments and address areas identified as low trash generating on the City’s baseline trash generation map.

Potential Additional Small Full Capture Systems
Based on the GIS data provided by the City, there are roughly 1,315 storm drain inlets in the public ROW that drain areas with moderate or high trash generation in the City. Of these inlets, it is estimated that roughly 270 will not support small full capture systems due to the configuration of the catch basins or the prohibitively large size of the upstream drainage area. Therefore, it may be possible to install inlet-based small trash full capture systems in a total of 1,045 inlets that drain moderate or high trash generating areas. Based on the desktop analysis described in Appendix B, it is estimated that the City could install up to 655 small trash full capture systems in a portion of these 1,045 inlets and address all moderate and Outlet screen-type of catch basin insert trash full capture system (Courtesy of Alameda County Flood and Water Conservation District) Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 11
high trash generating areas that drain to the public ROW. 3 The locations of these 655 systems are
illustrated Figure 3 and in Appendix B.

Of the 655 small full capture systems, 287 are located within the four catchment areas where large full capture systems appear to be the most-cost effective types of full capture systems (see Appendix B). This leaves 368 small full capture systems located outside of these four large full capture system catchments where small full capture systems could be installed.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning, design, installation, and operation of the potential 655 small capture full trash capture devices throughout the City are presented in Table 4. Additional detail regarding the location, type and assumptions associated with these potential devices is included in Appendix B.

3 Because some inlets are connected by underground pipes (i.e., daisy-chained), devices placed in these 655 inlets will likely address trash from the land areas draining to the 1,045 inlets in the public ROW.

Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 12
Figure 3. Overview of the locations of 655 potential small trash full capture systems in the City of Redding, as identified in the Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation (see Appendix B).

Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 13
Table 4. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for the planning, installation, and operation of small trash full capture systems at 655 locations in the City of Redding. a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year Summary of Enhancement
City Staff Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Task Geographical Span
of Implementation Assumptions
Estimated
Staffing Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated
Costs Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
City develops
concept and
releases bid/RFP
for small
capture systems
655 public ROW
inlets in Moderate
and High trash
generating areas
that can support
small full capture
systems
All planning tasks conducted by City staff
City Project Coordinator- Storm
Drains 500 0.25 $260,900 $65,225 -- -- -- --
City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor 8 0.004 $168,700 $675 -- -- -- -- City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker 80 0.04 $103,240 $4,130 -- -- -- --
City Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker - Temporary (calculations
assume 2 workers)
160 0.08 $36,100 $2,888 -- -- -- --
Capital costs of
system,
installation, and
contingency
655 Public ROW
Inlets
• Contractor installs devices
• Capital costs estimated to be $1,000 per
device (see Appendix B)
• Replacement of each inlet twice over a 50-
year timeframe (i.e., average replacement
rate of 26 devices/yr) at $1,000/device
Materials Costs -- -- -- $655,000 -- -- -- $26,200
City develops
standard
operating
procedure for
maintenance of
small capture
systems.

City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor with
assistance from City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker develops standard
operating procedure for maintenance of
small capture systems.

City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor 80 0.04 $168,700 $6,748 -- -- -- -- City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker 24 0.01 $103,240 $1,032 -- -- -- --
City maintains
systems
All public ROW
inlets where Small
Capture Systems
are installed
• 655 locations
• 4 maintenance events per year per device
• Maintenance event (1 lead worker/
Vacuum Assisted Truck Operator and 1
maintenance staff)
• 1 hours per maintenance event
• Acquisition of 1 Vacuum Assisted Truck
City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker/ Vacuum Assisted Truck
Operator
-- -- -- -- 2620 1.31 $103,240 $135,244
City Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker - Temporary -- -- -- -- 2620 1.31 $36,100 $47,291 Vacuum Assisted Truck -- -- -- $630,000 -- -- -- $8,200 Overhead Costs NA Oversight of all tasks above City Assistant Director of Public Works 20 0.01 $330,380 $2,185 40 0.02 $339,380 $6,608

Totals 872 0.43 -- $1,369,002 5,280 2.64 -- $223,543
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 14

2.3 Trash Inspections on Private Properties
Based on preliminary source investigations conducted as part of this project, private properties with commercial, industrial, or high-density residential land uses remain important sources of trash to the City’s MS4. Stormwater and trash generated on these private properties drain to either storm drain inlets located in the adjacent public ROW or to private storm drain inlets located on the properties. To address these sources, municipalities in the San Francisco Bay Area have successfully instituted Trash Inspection Programs on private properties to address trash contributions from these properties. The trash inspection program typically entails the periodic assessment of trash levels on properties by City staff using an Onland Visual Assessment (OVTA) protocol and coordinating with property owners/managers to effectively manage trash levels. If trash levels are above an OVTA “A” score on the property during an inspection, then the City works with the property owners/managers to institute trash control measures to improve trash levels, until ultimately a consistent OVTA “A” score can be achieved. Should trash levels not improve, then the City would utilize its enforcement capabilities established through its stormwater ordinance to implement progressive enforcement actions, as necessary. Enforcement could entail requiring property owners to install and maintain trash full capture systems, so that the mandated trash reduction goal of full capture or equivalent is achieved on the property.

Existing Inspection Program
Industrial inspections are currently conducted by the City at a portion of the commercial and industrial facilities in the City of Redding to evaluate the proper functioning of restaurant grease traps and oil and water separators. The adequacy of trash management activities occurring on the property is not typically identified or evaluated as part of these inspections.

Potential Trash Inspection Program
A trash inspection program could be implemented by the City to address trash generated on private properties. The trash inspection program could entail the following:

1. Updating the City’s existing stormwater ordinance to more clearly require property owners to maintain trash generation levels at a low level or alternatively install and maintain trash full capture systems to address trash levels on their properties;

2. Formally adding an OVTA component to existing standard operating procedures used during industrial compliance inspections conducted by the City and providing periodic training to inspectors on OVTAs; and

3. Conducting targeted trash inspections at additional properties that generate significant levels of trash that are not currently inspected as part of the industrial compliance inspections using OVTA protocols, providing periodic training to inspectors on OVTAs.

Existing industrial compliance inspections would continue to occur at the same frequency and a trash component (i.e., OVTA) would be added to these inspections. If a property inspected has not achieved an “A” OVTA score, then the property would be reinspected at a set timeframe to ensure improvement in trash levels. For those properties where moderate (B) or high (C) OVTA scores were observed, enforcement and follow up inspections would be conducted by the City at a higher frequency until an “A” score is attained.

Properties not currently included in the stormwater inspection pool would be inspected once every 5- years, unless the property achieved an OVTA score of less than an “A”. For those properties where OVTA scores worse than an “A” were observed, enforcement and follow up inspections would be conducted by the City at a higher frequency. If an “A” score is not attained, requiring property owners to install their own full capture systems would be a potential step that the City could take, should other enforcement actions not succeed in reducing trash levels on the properties. The locations of properties where a trash inspection program could be implemented is included in Figure 4.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
Adding OVTAs to existing industrial compliance inspections will add additional time for each inspection, and thus would require additional inspection resources. Additionally, inspecting a larger pool of businesses and other private properties would also require new resources. These increases in the number of inspections conducted each year by the City would also be accompanied by additional costs associated with communications to applicable property owners to discuss/require improved trash management, the management of inspection data, and overhead/oversight costs. A preliminary, planning-level cost estimate associated with the implementation of a Trash Inspection Program is presented in Table 5.

Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 15

Figure 4. Overview of the private properties that generate baseline moderate, high or very high trash levels and therefore would be potentially subject to implementing new enhanced trash controls on private properties in the City of Redding.

Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 16
Table 5. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for creating and implementing a trash inspection program to address trash levels on private properties in the City of Redding.

Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Develop and
enforce authority
to require all
private properties
that fail to meet an
OVTA ‘A’ score
during inspections,
and have privately
owned and
operated storm
drains on their
property to install
full capture
system(s)
All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- have privately owned
and operated storm
drains on their
property
-failed to meet an
OVTA ‘A’ score during
enhanced or new
business inspections
Draft and develop new or refined
ordinance giving City the authority to
require trash management on all
private properties
City Storm Water
Management
Program
Coordinator
100 0.10 $321,060 $32,106 -- -- -- --
City
Environmental
Compliance
Manager
40 0.02 $435,380 $8,708 -- -- -- --
City Assistant
Director of Public
Works
4 0.002 $330,380 $661 -- -- -- --
Review final ordinance for approval
City Assistant
Director of Public
Works
4 0.002 $330,380 $661 -- -- -- --
Review final ordinance for approval City Attorney 4 0.002 $954,200 $1,908 -- -- -- -- Add trash
inspections (i.e.,
OVTAs) to existing
industrial
compliance
inspections
conducted at
restaurants
All restaurants:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- Are part of the City's
restaurant inspection
program
• 240 properties would need to be
inspected.
• Inspections would occur on an
annual basis.
• 25% of properties would need
follow-up inspections. Assumes 60
follow-up inspections would be
needed per year.
• An additional 0.5 hours per
inspection would be needed due to
adding trash inspection component
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 135 0.07 $291,040 $19,645
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 17
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Conduct trash
inspections and
determine if private
drainage is present
(i.e., OVTAs) at
applicable
properties that are
NOT part of the
restaurant
inspection
program.

All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- have privately owned
and operated storm
drains on their
property
- Are NOT part of the
City's restaurant
inspection program
• A total of 1,265 properties would
need to be inspected over the course
of 9 years (~141/year)
• 25% of the properties would need
follow-up inspections. Assumes ~ 35
follow-up inspections would be
needed per year
• 1 hour per inspection (including
travel time)
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 176 0.1 $291,040 $25,567
Communications to
applicable property
owners to
discuss/require
improved trash
management or
transition to full
capture.

All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- Are NOT part of the
City's restaurant
inspection program
- Are NOT achieving an
"A" OVTA score
• Assumes communications for
properties being inspected via
restaurant inspections but not
achieving OVTA "A" will be handled
via follow-up inspections. No costs
for these properties in this line item.
• Estimated 25% of properties
including those that are either part of
the restaurant inspection program or
not part of the restaurant inspection
program will NOT achieve OVTA "A"
score by follow-up inspections and
will need to implement full trash
capture or other new controls.

Communication costs for these
properties are in this line item.

City Inspector -- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $291,040 $5,821
Management of
inspection data.

Enter all data
collected via trash
inspections into the
excel database.

Flag facilities that
require follow-up
inspections
All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- have privately owned
and operated storm
drains on their
property
• 381 data entries per year
• 10 minutes per data entry City Inspector -- -- -- -- 63 0.03 $291,040 $9,230 Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 18
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Overhead Costs NA Provide oversight of above projects
City Storm Water
Management
Program
Coordinator
100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 60 0.03 $321,060 $9,632
City
Environmental
Compliance
Manager
40 0.02 $435,380 $8,708 40 0.02 $435,380 $8,708
For properties
where low trash
generation cannot
be achieved, notify
all applicable
property
owners/managers
that full capture
systems are
required by a
certain date
Coordinates development of model
communications. Identify property
owners/managers, perform data
analysis and compilation.

City Storm Water
Management
Program
Coordinator
-- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421
Reviews communications City Attorney -- -- -- -- 8 0.004 $954,200 $3,817 Totals 292 0.246 -- $68,804 562 0.294 -- $88,840
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.

Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 19

2.4 Curb-Inlet Screens on Inlets in the Public ROW
Curb inlet screens are treatment devices that block trash from entering a catch basin/inlet. These devices have some level of trash reduction benefit; however, they have not been well studied and are not certified/approved as trash full capture systems by the State Water Resources Control Board as full capture systems. Curb-inlet screens may
be retractable or fixed in place, and
generally have a perforated screen or
evenly spaced bars that are designed to
fit outside of, or immediately within the
storm drain curb opening. Retractable
screens open either manually or
hydraulically when a stormwater runoff
applies enough force on the screen. Since
curb-inlet screens block trash and debris
from entering the storm drain inlet or
storm drain, trash remains in the street
and is removed by regular street
sweeping or other measures.

Curb-inlet screens in combination with inlet-based full capture systems are currently used as trash control measures by many municipalities throughout California. Because they are not approved/certified as trash full capture systems, curb-inlet screens are often used to supplement inlet-based systems by blocking trash and debris before entering inlets, which reduces the frequency of inlet maintenance. The ability of curb-inlet screens alone to achieve full capture equivalency (i.e., low trash generation) has not been fully evaluated until recently.

Curb-inlet screens could benefit the City’s trash reduction program by preventing trash from reaching storm drain inlets/catch basins and being discharged via the City’s MS4. It could specifically help inlets in the City of Redding that drain directly into storm pipes that are larger or have greater flow than a small full capture device can handle. When properly maintained, curb-inlet screens can be effective at preventing trash from entering catch basins. Although there is not currently a widely accepted value for the trash reduction benefits that curb-inlet screens offer, curb-inlet screens have the potential to reduce a trash generating area to one score below its current trash generation rate (e.g., “B” score to “A” score) (EOA, In prep).

For this control measure, the installation of curb-inlet screens in moderate trash generating PLU areas where street sweeping is already occurring at least two times per month is the approach evaluated below. This control measure only targets moderate trash generating areas; no high trash generating areas will be treated with curb inlet screens. In the future, curb-inlet screens may be considered as a control measure for high trash generating areas, however, current studies only determined curb-inlet screen effective in moderate trash generating areas. A fully encompassing curb-inlet screen implementation program in moderate trash generating areas could help the City achieve approximately 25% trash reduction. The acceptable trash reduction benefit associated with curb-inlet screens is currently under discussion with San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board staff and could set some level of precedent on a state-wide level.

Existing Curb-Inlet Screens
Currently, no curb-inlet screens are installed on storm drain inlets in the City’s public ROW.

Potential Installation and location of Curb-Inlet Screens There are roughly 1,315 inlets in the public ROW that are in areas with moderate or high trash generation in the City. Of these inlets, an estimated 716 have curb inlets that may support the installation of curbinlet screens. This includes some of the inlets that have the potential for small trash full capture systems, as well as inlets where it does not appear feasible to install/maintain small trash full capture systems. Of the 716 inlets, 312 inlets drain areas with moderate trash generation and the streets associated with the inlets have street sweeping that occurs at least two times a month. These 312 inlets serve as the potential pool where curb-inlet screens could be installed (Figure 5). Of the 312 inlets in the pool, the City could choose to install curb-inlet screens in all or a portion of these inlets.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
For the purposes of estimating the costs of implementing a curb-inlet screen program, it is assumed that the City would purchase and have a vendor install curb-inlet screens on all 312 inlets in the City’s public Curb-inlet Screen
(Courtesy of State of Hawaii Department of Transportation) Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 20
ROW. The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the fabrication, installation, and operation of the new 312 curb-inlet screen devices are presented in Table 6.

Figure 5. Overview of the locations for 312 potential curb-inlet screens in the City of Redding.

Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 21
Table 6. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for installing and maintaining 312 curb-inlet screens in the City of Redding.

Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task Geographical Span of
Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
City develops
concept and
releases bid/RFP
for curb-inlet
screens
312 public ROW inlets in
Moderate trash
generating
All planning tasks conducted by City Staff
City Program
Coordinator- Storm
Drains
200 0.1 $260,900 $26,090 -- -- -- --
Vendor fabricates
and Installs Curbinlet Screens312 Public Row Inlets
• Contractor installs devices
• Capital costs can range from $400 to $700.

Costs of each inlet screen are assumed to
be $500
• Replacement of each inlet device twice
during a 50-yr timeframe (i.e., average
replacement rate of 12 screens/yr) at
$500/screen
Materials Cost -- -- -- $156,000 -- -- -- $6,000
Oversight of
contractor
installation Inlets installed in all
public ROW inlets in
Moderate trash
generating areas
• Contractor fabricates and installs curb-inlet
screens
• City staff oversight over installation,
including initial inspection of devices.

City Storm Drain
Utility Supervisor 100 0.05 $168,700 $8,435 -- -- -- -- On-going oversight
of
replacement/repair
process by
contractor
• 2 inspections per year of each inlet to check
for damage and repairs.
• 10 minutes per inspection
City Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker
- Temporary
-- -- -- -- 104 0.05 $36,100 $1,877
Oversight of all
tasks above NA Provide oversight of above projects
City Assistant
Director of Public
Works
20 0.01 $330,380 $3,304 20 0.01 $330,380 $3,304
Totals 320 0.16 -- $193,829 124 0.06 -- $11,181

a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.

Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 22

2.5 Expanded On-land Cleanups
Cleanups that remove trash from streets, sidewalks,
and adjacent properties can have a significant impact
on the levels of trash in the City’s MS4. On-land
cleanups consist of manual removal of trash by
agency staff, contractors hired as part of an
association or business improvement districts (BIDs),
or volunteers. These cleanups target known trash
generating areas or dumping sites where street
sweepers cannot access or effectively remove trash.

On-land cleanups can help decrease trash levels that
reach MS4s from these trash-prone/less accessible
areas. Based on literature reviews conducted, the
effectiveness of on-land cleanup in reducing trash
reaching the stormwater conveyance system has not been evaluated in the context of FCSE. That said, conducting consistent on-land cleanups could conceptually sustain an improved level of trash (i.e., low generation) in areas with moderate or high baseline trash levels. The magnitude (frequency) and extent (location) to which cleanups would need to be conducted to observe reductions in trash to acceptable levels (i.e., FCSE) is likely dependent upon the baseline level of trash generation that occurs in the area.

The higher the trash generation, the more frequent trash would need to be removed to achieve FCSE.

The costs associated with on-land cleanups will be site-specific and dependent on the type (e.g., agency staff, contractor or volunteers) and number of individuals needed for the cleanup events, and the frequency of cleanups that would need to occur. Reductions associated with the cleanups would need to be observed via OVTAs conducted by City staff or contractors.

An estimate of the trash reduction benefits of implementing an enhanced/expanded on-land cleanup program is generally unknown but could be estimated based on a set of assumptions regarding the frequency and extent of the cleanup activities, and the baseline trash generation levels within the areas where the expanded cleanup program is being implemented.

Existing On-land Cleanup Program
The City has a number of active on-land cleanup activities currently underway. There is an Adopt-a-Block Program in TMA 1 (downtown) where citizens or businesses can commit to cleaning trash up on a specific City block. This program currently covers roughly 6.5 curb miles of streets. A Business Improvement District (BID) that funds maintenance for landscaping and keeping the downtown area clean is also active in TMA 1. Additionally, the City’s Solid Waste Team removes trash from illegal dumping sites or homeless encampments on a periodic basis. The City uses the community work program, which gives those that are incarcerated the option to clean up trash instead of spending their days in prison, to assist with homeless and illegal dumping cleanup events. Other cleanup programs are conducted by the City in collaboration with Bethel School (known as City Project) and local fly-fishing groups, and most frequently focus on cleanups in park and within rivers.

Potential Expansion of On-land Cleanups
Enhancements to the existing on-land cleanup programs in the City could involve reinforcing and expanding the current Adopt-a-Block program to the other areas of the City with a goal of another 10 curb miles being adopted and cleaned. An Adopt-a Drain program could also be developed and managed in parallel with the Adopt-a-Block program. Additional blocks in TMA 1 would benefit most, while TMA 2 and TMA 6 appear like they could also use an Adopt-a-Block and/or Adopt-a-Drain program. Additionally, there are opportunities to create new BIDs in TMAs 3 and 4 and along Lake Boulevard near the intersection of Highway 273. Most cleanups currently focus on undeveloped non-PLU areas and therefore new on-land cleanups would need to pivot to concentrate on moderate and high trash generating areas.

The City could also coordinate additional volunteer cleanups that could take place more frequently (e.g., monthly) in targeted neighborhoods. The events could strive to draw local volunteers to spur pride in their communities and could possibly receive assistance from the Shasta Support Service, a local nonprofit volunteer group. Clean-ups in industrial areas or along arterial roads could also be conducted by contractors or by employing individuals that are currently homeless. Working with local non-profit organizations, other cities in California have seen great success with hiring homeless to remove trash from City streets and areas, and using the opportunity to provide job skills and social services to those that are currently unsheltered in the community. Enhanced cleanups using homeless individuals would be most effective in TMAs 7 and 10.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of an enhanced On-land Cleanup Program throughout the City is presented in Table 7.

Members of the Shasta County Sheriffs Alternative Custody Program assisting in collecting trash from an illegal encampment (Courtesy of the Redding Police Department)
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 23
Table 7. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for Expanded On-land Cleanups in the City of Redding.

Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Enhancements Costs Geographical Span of
Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of FTEa Hours Portion of FTEa
Expand existing
Adopt-a-Block
and develop
Adopt-a-Drain
program
TMAs 1, 2 and/or 6
Outreach to new areas for Adopt-aBlock/Adopt-a-Street and citywide outreach for Adopt-a-Drain
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421 -- -- -- --
Coordination with volunteers and
program management
City Parks and
Facilities Supervisor -- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $189,500 $3,790 Develop
additional BID
TMAs 3, 4 and/or 8
(along Lake Blvd)
• Outreach to businesses and hold public
meeting to discuss BID development
for potential members
• Assumes 2-hour meeting with 8 hours
of preparation and 4 days of outreach
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421 -- -- -- --
Ongoing BID coordination with
businesses
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
-- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421
Implement a
monthly
volunteer
cleanup in
neighborhoods.

Residential and
commercial
neighborhoods with
Moderate and High
trash generating areas
Staff identify feasible areas for cleaning Deputy Director of Solid Waste -- -- -- -- 20 0.01 $307,100 $3,071
• Staff will coordinate and participate in
new events
• Assumes 12 events per year at 8 hours
per event, including coordination
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
-- -- -- -- 96 0.05 $321,060 $16,053
Employ
homeless to
perform onland cleanups
of trash
Industrial areas and
along arterial roads in
Moderate and High
trash generating areas
in TMA 7 and to a
lesser degree in TMA
10 Increase workload of City Community
Service Officer by 80 hours per month to
work with homeless
City Community
Service Officer
(Police Officer)
-- -- -- -- 960 0.48 $95,480 $45,830
Overhead Costs NA
• Pick up and disposal of trash at
volunteer and homeless on-land
cleanup events
• 2 staff to pick up and dispose of trash
• Assumes 1 hour per trash pickup
City Solid Waste
Truck Driver -- -- -- -- 60 0.03 $117,460 $3,524
City Solid Waste
Worker -- -- -- -- 60 0.03 $79,180 $2,375
Equipment needed for disposal including
bags, gloves and a truck Materials cost -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $500 Provide oversight of above Tasks Deputy Director of
Solid Waste -- -- -- -- 20 0.01 $307,100 $3,071
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 24
Totals 80 0.04 -- $12,842 1,296 0.65 -- $84,636 a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.

Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 25

2.6 Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management
Public container and bin management can significantly reduce the amount of trash observed on publicly accessible areas that is due to pedestrian litter. Management of these receptacles involves ensuring that they are in placed in areas most convenient to deposition, that an effective type of receptacle is used, and that the receptacles are maintained to prevent scavenging and overflow of trash. It is imperative that public containers are easily accessible and visible to pedestrians to incentivize throwing trash in a receptacle instead of littering. This means installing enough public containers in high-traffic areas to reduce the risk of littering.

While traditional outdoor trash receptacles are the most common, Big Belly trash compactors are unique because they use solar power to compress trash and have been shown to be effective in areas with high trash volume. Dumpsters are most frequently used by commercial enterprises or apartment complexes and should be managed properly to ensure that open lids or “dumpster diving” does not contribute to the spread of trash. Residential bins require pick-up of trash on a regular basis to prevent overflow of trash and higher potential for scavenging.

Properly managing these public and private trash receptacles can help decrease trash levels that reach MS4s. Conducting effective and consistent public container and bin management could conceptually sustain an improved level of trash (i.e., low generation) in areas with moderate or high baseline trash levels. The magnitude (frequency) and extent (location) to which management would need to be conducted to observe reductions in trash to acceptable levels (i.e., FCSE) is likely dependent upon the baseline level of trash generation that occurs in the area. For areas of higher trash generation, more bins and an increased level of protection and maintenance would be needed to achieve FCSE. The costs associated with enhanced public container and bin management will be site-specific and dependent on the type (e.g., agency staff or contractor) and number of individuals needed for the installation and servicing of the bins. An estimate of the trash reduction benefits of implementing enhanced public container and bin management is generally unknown, but could be estimated based on a set of assumptions regarding the frequency and extent of the trash receptacle management, and the baseline trash generation levels within the areas where the additional receptacles are being implemented.

Existing Public Container/Bin Management Program
There are currently 18 Big Belly trash compactors installed across the City of Redding. These receptacles have proven to be tamper proof, which helps prevent scavenging. Big Belly provides maintenance of these receptacles that the City leases. The City has a Solid Waste app to answer questions on bin management and report issues. Residents and businesses can rent dumpsters and drop boxes. The Solid Waste program has worked hard to prevent scavenging from dumpsters, through a number of tamper proof mechanisms. However, scavenging from public containers still remains a source of trash in the City.

Potential Expansion of Public Container/Bin Management
Enhancements to the existing public container and bin management efforts could include installing additional Big Belly trash receptacles in areas of moderate and high trash generation with high pedestrian traffic or currently overflowing trash receptacles. The results from recent field visits suggest that while the City has a sufficient number of trash receptacles in most areas, scavenging by homeless remains an issue that Big Belly trash receptacles could help prevent. Big Belly receptacles could be installed in additional locations throughout TMA 1 (downtown) as well as in TMAs 3 and 4, where it appears that there is a lack of public receptacles.

In addition to installing additional public trash containers, it is recommended that the City consider developing an improved mobile app to better track illegal dumping and littering issues and respond in a more efficient manner. Although the City has a solid waste app to help residents and businesses understand trash pickups and report issues, using the “See-Click-Fix” app may further assist the City in identifying areas that require bin management. The app allows users to report issues to the City with a reference location, and in Redding users could report overflowing bins and dumpsters, areas without available bins and areas where illegal dumping or littering is prevalent.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of an enhanced public container and bin management program throughout the City is presented in Table 8.

Big Belly Solar Trash Bin/Compactor
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 26
Table 8. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for enhancing Public Container/Bin Management in the City of Redding.

Summary of Enhancement City Staff
Implementing
Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Enhancements Costs Geographical Span of
Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of FTEa Hours Portion of FTEa
Install new/additional
Big Belly Trash
Compactors
TMAs 1, 3 and 4
Installation of 20 new Big Belly
receptacles
City Solid Waste
Worker
(Calculations
assumes 2
workers)
60 0.03 $79,180 $2,375 -- -- -- --
Trash-pickup (assumes 10 pickups per
year at 1 hour each)
City Solid Waste
Worker -- -- -- -- 200 0.1 $79,180 $7,918
Leasing Costs (assumes $3000 per can
per year) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $60,000
Implement utilization
of See-Click-Fix App Entire City
Outreach to residents and businesses
about See-Click-Fix
City Outreach
and Monitoring
Coordinator
100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 -- -- -- --
Cost of purchasing See-Click-Fix -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $8,700 Respond to See-Click-Fix Issues
City Solid Waste
Worker
(Calculations
assumes 2
workers)
-- -- -- -- 200 0.1 $79,180 $7,918
Overhead Costs NA Provide oversight of above tasks Deputy Director of Solid Waste -- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $307,100 $6,142
Totals 160 0.08 -- $18,428 440 0.22 -- $90,678
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 27

2.7 Enhanced City-wide Public Education and Outreach Program Education and outreach programs are designed to raise citizen awareness about the impacts of littering or illegal dumping and teach citizens how to change their behavior accordingly. Programs usually include a mixture of anti-littering advocacy, reinforced with the development of classroom curricula, storm drain signage and volunteer cleanups. To effectively target audiences, program managers need to have a strong understanding of the behaviors and attitudes of litterers before developing an outreach program.

Programs can change people's attitudes, but implementation needs to be consistent over time to maintain performance. It is difficult to estimate the percentage reduction that the City may achieve through implementing an enhanced City-wide public education and outreach program, however, EOA staff have qualitatively estimated that an enhanced program implemented as described in this section could offer a 5% maximum trash reduction in the City by 2030.

Existing Public Education and Outreach Program
The existing stormwater public education program
in the City is primarily facilitated by each school.

Some elementary and high school students attend
presentations on watershed health and stormwater
pollutants and take tours of the water treatment
plant. The outreach component of the program
hosts local cleanup events and develops PSA’s
including “DrakenBill”, two rubber ducks who
emphasize the importance of stormwater
management.

Potential Enhancement of Public Education and Outreach Program Expansion of the community outreach and education program could benefit overall trash load reduction by promoting litter prevention initiatives. Opportunities for growth in public education could involve additional school programs for middle schoolers potentially taught by high schoolers. Enhancement of the outreach program could include developing new initiatives such as a “Clean Street” campaign or further use of the “DrakenBill” PSA series. Schools were noted as significant sources of trash in EOA’s recent source investigation. Ephemeral events or programs mean a lack of reinforcement for the community in maintaining clean watershed objectives. By introducing storm water pollution prevention throughout schooling and keeping these initiatives and programs consistent over time, students and communities will engrain these concepts into the culture of the City.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of an enhanced city-wide public education and outreach program throughout the City is presented in Table 9.

Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 28
Table 9. Preliminary Planning-Level Costs Estimates for an Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and Outreach Program in the City of Redding.

Summary of Enhancement
City Staff Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(annual)
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task Geographical Span
of Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of FTEa Hours Portion of FTEa
Expansion of
outreach and
education program to
involve additional
school programs for
middle schoolers
Middle schools in the City
City staff will develop and
coordinate further
education programs and
provide training to
volunteers to present to
classrooms and student
groups, and will participate
in the implementation of
the program
City Outreach and Monitoring
Coordinator 300 0.15 $321,060 $48,159 200 0.1 $321,060 $32,106 City Storm Water Management
Program Coordinator 100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 200 0.1 $321,060 $32,106 Flat rate cost estimate for
educational materials Materials cost NA NA NA -- NA NA NA $1000 Implement an
outreach messaging
campaign
City-wide- will conduct
outreach on social media
and may conduct direct
outreach at businesses,
industrial facilities, schools,
parks
City staff develops and
implements social media
campaign
City Outreach and
Monitoring Coordinator 160 0.08 $321,060 $25,685 100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 City Storm Water Management
Program Coordinator 40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421 100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 Flat rate cost estimate for
outreach materials Materials cost NA NA NA -- NA NA NA $1000 Overhead Costs NA Provide oversight of above
projects
Environmental Compliance
Manager
20 0.01 $435,380 $4,354 20 0.01 $435,380 $4,354
Totals 620 0.31 -- $100,672 620 0.31 -- $102,672
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.

Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 29

2.8 Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware The City of Berkeley and San Mateo Unincorporated
County recently adopted a comprehensive Singleuse Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance that will ultimately ban the use and distribution of plastic
single-use takeout food-ware for all food vendors.

Adopting a similar ordinance would reduce the
amount of single-use takeout food-ware in the City,
which is a main source of trash in the City of
Redding. Reducing the amount of single-use takeout
food-ware would contribute to trash reduction in
the City as a whole. Reductions associated with the
ordinance would need to be observed via OVTAs
conducted by City staff or contractors. Based on
previous studies evaluating the types of trash in
MS4s and the successes that municipalities have
had in the Bay Area in reducing the use of single-use
expanded polystyrene food ware, it is anticipated
that the adoption, implementation and
enforcement of a comprehensive Single-use Plastic
Food Service Ware Ordinance could assist the City in reducing up to 15% of the litter observed on streets and sidewalks.

Existing Single-Use Foodware Trash Control
The City does not currently have an ordinance in place relating to single-use plastic food ware or EPS. The City has implemented the following actions to reduce the use/distribution of litter-prone items:

Single-Use Plastic Bag Ordinance
The Single-Use plastic bag ordinance banned single-use plastic bag use in the City and installed a fee on paper and reusable plastic bags. The Single-Use plastic bag ordinance went into effect on November 2018. This ordinance is implemented to reduce the environmental impact of singleuse bag litter in the City.

Enhanced Source Control Actions
The enhanced control measure identified is for the City to develop, adoption, implement and enforce a comprehensive Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance.

Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of a Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance in the City of Redding is presented in Table 10.

Example Public Education Materials on a New Single-Use
Foodware Ordinance
(Courtesy of the City/County of San Francisco)
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 30
Table 10. Preliminary Planning-Level Costs estimates for adopting and implementing a Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance.

Summary of Enhancement
City Staff Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(annual)
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Tasks Costs
Geographical
Span of
Implementation
Assumptions
Hours
Portion
of FTEa
Hours Portion
of FTEa
Draft a single-use plastic food
ware ban ordinance and
provide staff support on the
adoption and implementation
of this ordinance. Ordinance
could include items such as
cups, lids, utensils, straws,
clamshells, and other
disposable items.

Entire City
Assumes the City will use similar
ordinances (i.e. Berkeley, Bay
Area Counties) as a draft
template, minimizing planning
hours
City Environmental
Compliance Manager 500 0.25 $435,380 $108,845 -- -- -- -- Create outreach to applicable
businesses on the ordinance,
alternative products, etc.

Coordinate communications
with business owners.

Create and implement an
outreach program to advertise
new ordinance
City Outreach and
Monitoring Coordinator 500 0.25 $321,060 $80,265 -- -- -- -- Outreach Materials Cost NA -- -- -- $1,000 -- -- -- --
Inspect businesses to enforce
the single-use plastic food ware
ban
• Assumes 1200 of 1568
commercial business will be
inspected for compliance
with ordinance
• Assumes 1 hour per
inspection (Includes driving
time and tracking/data
entry)
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 1200 0.6 $291,040 $176,624
Overhead Costs Provide oversight of above
tasks
City Environmental Compliance
Manager 20 0.01 $271,900 $2,719 20 0.01 $435,380 $4,354 Totals 1020 0.51 -- $192,829 1220 0.61 -- $178,978
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.

Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 31

2.9 Summary of Potential New or Enhanced Source Controls The estimated costs and potential trash reduction benefits of implementing new or enhanced trash control measures described in the previous sections are summarized in Table 11. Costs are presented as base/initial costs, on-going/annual costs, and 50-year lifecycle costs. Base/initial costs are associated with design and capital (i.e., construction/fabrication, installation, etc.) for large and small full capture systems, and the development, adoption, and upfront costs for institutional and source controls. On-going/annual costs are associated with the on-going costs to the City to maintain, implement, replace, and/or enforce the trash control measure. 50-year lifecycle costs are based on the sum of base/initial costs and the average annual implementation costs over a 50-year timeframe. Lifecycle costs have not been adjusted for inflation and assume that average on-going/annual costs would remain consistent of the 50-year timeframe. The cost estimates presented in Table 11 are used in Section 3.0 to compare multiple trash control measure implementation scenarios that are designed to achieve the California statewide goal of full capture or equivalency for trash generated in PLU areas.

The estimated maximum trash reduction benefit for each control measure is also included in Table 11.

The maximum benefit is based on the City’s baseline trash generation map and assumes for structural controls that the City would receive additional (offsetting) reduction by addressing trash from non-PLU areas, which are largely associated with streets/roadways. Where trash reduction benefit information was not available for a specific control measure, best professional judgement was used to estimate the maximum potential benefit of implementing a control measure.

Table 11. Summary of the preliminary planning level cost estimate and trash reduction benefits of implementing potential new or enhanced trash control measures. a

Control Measure Base/Initial Tasks
On-going/Annual
Tasks
50-Year Lifecycle Costs
Estimated
Maximum
Potential
Trash
Reduction
Large Trash Full Capture
Systems
$4,564,287 $59,278 $7,528,193 ~ 39%c
Small Trash Full Capture
Systems $1,369,002 $223,543 $12,546,152 ~ 57%d
Trash Inspections of
Private Properties b $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814 ~ 55%
Publicly-Owned Curb
Inlet Screens $193,829 $11,181 $752,879 ~ 25%
Expanded On-Land
Cleanups $12,842 $84,636 $4,244,632 --
e
Enhanced Public
Container/Bin
Management
$18,428 $90,678 $4,552,328 --
e
Enhanced City-Wide
Public Education and
Outreach Program
$100,672 $102,672 $5,234,262 ~ 5%f
Municipal Ordinance –
Single-use Plastic Food
Service Ware
$192,829 $178,978 $9,141,719 ~ 15%g
a These values are calculated using the 2020 value of the US dollar. b These values combine properties that drain to the public ROW and properties that drain to inlets on private properties into one cost estimate.

In some scenario sections, these categories will be split with a proportion of the total cost estimates that is consistent with the proportion of acreage that each category holds in the City.
c Reduction benefits include addressing trash from PLU areas within catchments FTC01B, FTC01C-3, FTC03A-1, and FTC04E. d Reduction benefits include addressing trash from all PLU areas. e Estimates vary based on frequency and where on-land cleanups and public container/bin management occur, thus no maximum reductions were calculated.
f This is a qualitative estimate based the maximum demonstrated reduction by a public education and outreach program. g Based on information regarding the estimated proportion of trash in stormwater that is single-use plastic food ware (i.e., SF Bay Trash Generation Rates Study – BASMAA 2014), and the estimated effectiveness of the potential ordinance.

Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 32

3. Trash Control Measure Implementation Scenarios
There are a number of different combinations of the trash control measure implementation scenarios that the City could choose to implement to enhance the reduction of trash in stormwater and address the goal established in the Trash Amendments. Four implementation scenarios are described in this section (Table 12). Each scenario was selected based on existing information on the benefits of the associated control measures included in each scenario. It is estimated that each scenario could achieve the full capture or equivalency trash reduction goal in the City if fully implemented. The preliminary planning level cost estimates for each scenario are also included in this section.

Table 12. Implementation scenarios for new/enhanced trash control measures designed to achieve the goal of the Trash Amendments (i.e., full capture or equivalent in all PLU areas) in the City of Redding.

Implementation
Scenario Large Trash Full Capture
Systems Small Trash Full Capture Systems Trash Inspections (including OVTAs) on Private Property Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management Curb-inlet screens on Inlets in the Public ROW Expanded On-Land Cleanups Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and Outreach Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food
Service Ware OVTAs on Public Streets & Sidewalks
1 • • •
2 • •
3 • • • • • •
4 • • • • • • •
These four scenarios are organized in the following way:
• Scenario 1 includes the installation of four (4) large trash full capture systems described in section

2.1 and outlined in the City’s Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation (Appendix B), the installation of 368 small trash full capture systems in areas outside of the catchments for the four large systems, and the implementation of a trash inspection program to address trash on properties that don’t drain to the public ROW.
• Scenario 2 is a modification of Scenario 1, where the actions listed in Scenario 1 are implemented, but instead of installing large trash capture systems in the four catchments, an additional (287) small trash full capture systems are installed and maintained. • Scenario 3 includes the installation of four (4) large trash full capture systems as outlined in section 2.1, the implementation of a trash inspection program to address trash on properties that don’t drain to the public ROW, the installation and maintenance of 312 curb-inlet screens to address trash in the public ROW, and the expansion of on-land cleanup programs. • Scenario 4 includes a set of six (6) institutional and source control measures, and excludes the installation of large or small trash full capture systems.

Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 33

3.1 Scenario 1: Trash Full Capture - Large and Small Systems In scenario 1 the City would install and maintain large full capture systems at four (4) catchment locations and 368 small trash full capture systems in inlets in the public ROW that are outside of the catchments for the large full capture systems. These actions would address all trash-generating areas in the City that drain to the public ROW via a combination of large and small trash full capture systems. Additionally, the City would develop and implement a trash inspection program to address trash on private properties that enters the City’s MS4 through storm drain inlets located on private properties. City staff would conduct OVTAs to verify low trash generation via the inspections. No additional institutional or source controls would be implemented under this scenario. The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 13. There is a relatively high level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal established by the Trash Amendments.

Table 13. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 1.

3.2 Scenario 2: Trash Full Capture - Small Systems
In scenario 2, the City would install and maintain small trash full capture systems in all 655 inlets in the public ROW that are associated with moderate or high trash generating areas. No large full capture systems would be installed in this scenario. Additionally, the City would develop and implement a trash inspection program to address trash on private properties that drain to storm drain inlets located on private properties. City staff would conduct OVTAs to verify low trash generation via the inspections. No additional institutional or source controls would be implemented under this scenario. The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 14. There is a relatively high level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal.

Table 14. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 2.

Control Measure Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs 655 Publicly-Owned Small Full Capture
Systems (all areas) $1,369,002 $223,543 $12,546,152
Trash Inspection Program on Private
Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814
Totals $1,437,806 $312,383 $17,056,956
Control Measure Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs Large Full Capture Systems at
four (4) locations $4,564,287 $59,278 $7,528,193
368 Small Trash Full Capture
Systems (outside of
Catchments for Large Trash
Full Capture Systems)
$1,082,002 $145,698 $8,366,902
Trash Inspection Program on
Private Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814
Totals $5,715,093 $293,816 $20,405,893
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 34

3.3 Scenario 3: Large Full Capture Systems & Multiple Institutional and Source Controls
In this scenario, all remaining significant trash generating areas would be addressed by:
• Fifteen large trash full capture systems at four catchment locations; • Trash Inspection Program to identify trash levels on private properties and requires property owners to implement additional actions to reduce trash to a low trash generating level or install a full capture system;
• Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management;
• 312 Curb Inlet Screens installed on inlets in the public ROW; • Expanded On-land Cleanups; and
• In addition to OVTAs conducted as part of the Trash Inspection Program on private properties, the City conducts OVTAs at selected locations on streets and sidewalks to verify reductions associated with public container management and expanded on-land cleanups.4 The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 15. There is a relatively moderate level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal.

Table 15. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 3.

Control Measure/ Action Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs 15 Large Full Capture Systems at 4
catchment locations $4,564,287 $59,278 $7,528,193
Trash Inspections on Private Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814 Enhanced Public Container/Bin
Management $18,428 $90,678 $4,552,328
Curb-inlet Screens on inlets in the Public
ROW $193,829 $11,181 $752,879
Expanded On-Land Cleanups $12,842 $84,636 $4,244,632
OVTAs on Streets/Sidewalks to Assess
Progress $10,000 $4,500 $235,000
Totals $4,868,191 $339,113 $21,823,847

4 Assumes OVTAs are conducted by two City staff or consultants at ($100,000 FTE Salary). OVTAs are conducted 3x/year at approximately 30 sites that are each 500 feet in length on average. Each assessment takes roughly 0.5 hrs, including travel time.

Also assumes that data are managed in a relatively efficient manner with limited costs.

Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 35

3.4 Scenario 4: Only Institutional and Source Controls
In this scenario, all remaining moderate or high trash generating areas would be addressed solely by additional institutional and source controls. No new full capture systems are installed as part of this implementation scenario. The following institutional and source controls would be implemented:
• Trash Inspection Program to identify trash levels on private properties and requires property owners to implement additional actions to reduce trash to a low trash generating level or install a full capture system(s);
• Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management;
• 312 Curb-Inlet Screens installed on inlets in the public ROW; • Expanded On-land Cleanups;
• Enhanced City-wide Public Education and Outreach Program for Litter; • A New Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware; and • In addition to OVTAs conducted as part of the Trash Inspection Program on private properties, the City conducts OVTAs at selected locations on streets and sidewalks to verify reductions associated with public container management and expanded on-land cleanups.5 The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 16. There is a relatively moderate level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal.

Table 16. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 4.

Control Measure/ Action Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs Trash Inspections on Private Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814 Enhanced Public Container/Bin
Management $18,428 $90,678 $4,552,328
Curb-inlet Screens on inlets in the Public
ROW $193,829 $11,181 $752,879
Expanded On-Land Cleanups $12,842 $84,636 $4,244,632
Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and
Outreach $100,672 $102,672 $5,234,262
Municipal Ordinance – Single Use Plastic
Food Service Ware $134,549 $94,447 $4,856,899
OVTAs on Streets/Sidewalks to Assess
Progress $12,500 $6,000 $312,500
Totals $541,625 $478,454 $24,464,314

5 Assumes OVTAs are conducted by two City staff or consultants at ($100,000 FTE Salary). OVTAs are conducted 3x/year at approximately 40 sites that are each 500 feet in length on average. Each assessment takes roughly 0.5 hrs, including travel time.

Also assumes that data are managed in a relatively efficient manner with limited costs.

Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 36

3.5 Comparison of Trash Control Measure Implementation Scenarios The estimated costs of implementing the six (6) different trash control measure implementation scenarios described in this section are compared in Table 20. The estimated levels of confidence that each scenario will achieve the overall MRP trash reduction goal of 100% (i.e., no adverse effects) are also summarized in Table 17.

Table 17. Summary table of preliminary planning level cost estimates for trash control measure implementation scenarios designed to achieve the trash reduction goal mandated by the statewide Trash Amendments.

Implementation Scenario
Base/Initial
Tasks
On-going/Annual
Tasks
50 Year
Lifecycle Costs
Confidence in
Achieving Trash
Amendments Goal
(Full Capture or
Equivalent in PLU
Areas)
1 - Trash Full Capture - Large and
Small Systems $5,715,093 $293,816 $20,405,893 High
2 - Trash Full Capture - Small
Systems $1,437,806 $312,383 $17,056,956 High
3 - Large Full Capture Systems &
Multiple Institutional and Source
Controls
$4,868,191 $339,113 $21,823,847 Moderate
4 - Only Institutional and Source
Controls $541,625 $478,454 $24,464,314 Moderate

4. 10-year Trash Control Measure Action Plan
Although the City currently has a robust trash control program, the City will likely need to enhance many of its existing trash control measures, as well as begin implementing new trash control measures to address trash levels in moderate and high trash generating PLU areas to address the mandated Trash Amendments goal of full capture or equivalent in PLU areas by 2030. Four (4) potential trash control measure implementation scenarios were developed, and the associated costs of these scenarios were estimated to help the City identify the resources needed to achieve this goal by 2030. These scenarios each have different base/initial costs and ongoing/annual costs, and different levels of confidence in that the implementation of these actions will achieve the goal of the Trash Amendments.

Due to the high level of confidence in achieving the trash goal, Scenario 1 (Trash Full Capture – Large and Small Systems) and Scenario 2 (Trash Full Capture – Small Systems) are the most high priority implementation scenarios for the City. Based on discussions with City staff, large systems are preferrable to small systems due to the lower costs for operating and maintaining these systems, and therefore Scenario 1 (Trash Full Capture – Large and Small Systems) was selected as the preliminary recommended approach to addressing trash in the City. This approach relies on the implementation of the following trash control measures over the next ten (10) years:

Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 37
• Installation and maintenance of large trash full capture systems at four (4) locations; • Installation and maintenance of 368 small trash full capture systems in inlets in the public ROW located outside of the catchments addressed by the large full capture systems; and • Implementation of a trash inspection program to address trash on private properties that enters the City’s MS4 through storm drain inlets located on private properties.

The 10-year implementation phasing of this approach is outlined in Table 18. Based on this implementation phasing, costs estimates and staffing resource needs for each fiscal year leading to fully addressing the Trash Amendments goal by December 2030 is presented in Table 19. The Implementation Strategy (Table 18) and cost/resource estimate (Table 19) provide the City with an preliminary long-term action plan to address the goal of the Trash Amendments. As the action plan is implemented, the strategy and associated cost estimates are likely to change based on new information gathered during the City’s implementation process. Therefore, cost estimates presented in Table 19 should be periodically updated to assist the City with future planning/budgeting.

Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 38
Table 18. Summary of tasks in 10-year Action Plan for the City of Redding.

Fiscal Year
Control Measure Category
Large Full Capture System Small Full Capture System Trash Inspections on Private Properties FY 22/23 • With consultant support, City continues evaluating the feasibility of installing/constructing large full capture system at the four (4) priority locations.
• Consultant and City conduct additional field visits to further evaluate feasibility at preliminary locations.
• City develops RFP for consultant engineering designs
services to further evaluate locations, design large capture systems, and develop refined cost estimates.
• City selects engineering design consultant and enters into agreement.
• With consultant support, City identifies and selects
catchment(s)/TMA(s) where small full capture systems should be the highest priority and the focus of FY 23/24 and 24/25 installations.
• City reviews existing legal authority to require all private properties to achieve low trash generation (i.e., OVTA ‘A’ score) and/or install full capture system(s) on their properties.

FY 23/24 • Engineering design consultant develops engineering design for large full capture system #1.
• City develops and releases bid package for vendor to install 50 full capture systems in highest priority catchment(s)/TMA(s).

Install systems in highest priority sites.
• Vendor installs 50 devices at highest priority sites. • City develops data management system to house O&M
information.
• With consultant report, City develops and documents the program for conducting OVTAs on private properties.
• With consultant report, City trains restaurant inspectors on conducting OVTAs during inspections (~240 inspections per year).
• With consultant report, City develops data management system for managing OVTA data.
• City develops educational materials for conducting outreach to restaurants and private property owners.

FY 24/25 • City releases bid package for construction contract for construction of large full capture system #1.
• Contractor constructs large full capture system #1.
• City purchases a Vacuum Assisted Truck
• City develops SOP for conducting O&M on small devices. • City conducts maintenance of 50 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

FY 25/26 • City develops a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for large full capture system #1.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture system #1.
• Design engineer consultant develops engineering design for large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• With consultant support, City identifies and selects
catchment(s)/TMA(s) where next round of small full capture systems should be installed.
• Vendor installs an additional 100 devices at high priority sites. • City conducts maintenance of 50 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 39
Fiscal Year
Control Measure Category
Large Full Capture System Small Full Capture System Trash Inspections on Private Properties • City releases bid package for construction contract for construction of large full capture systems #2 and #3.

FY 26/27 • Contractor constructs large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture system #1.
• City conducts maintenance of 150 small systems. • City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

FY 27/28 • Contractor constructs large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• City develops a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, and #3.
• City develops and releases bid package for vendor to install next round of full capture systems in highest priority
catchment(s)/TMA(s).
• Vendor installs an additional 100 devices at high priority sites. • City conducts maintenance of 150 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

FY 28/29 • Design engineer consultant develops engineering design for large full capture system #4.
• City releases bid package for construction contract for construction of large full capture system #4.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, and #3.
• City conducts maintenance of 250 small systems. • City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

FY 29/30 • Contractor constructs large full capture system #4. • City develops a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for large full capture systems #4.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, and #3.
• City develops and releases bid package for vendor to install next round of full capture systems in highest priority
catchment(s)/TMA(s).
• Vendor installs an additional 118 devices at high priority sites.

City conducts maintenance of 250 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

FY 30/31 • City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, #3, and #4.
• City conducts maintenance of 368 small systems. • City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.

Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 40

Table 19. Estimated City of Redding consultant/capital costs and staffing resource needs for implementing the 10-year Action Plan.

Fiscal Year
Estimated City of Redding Staffing Resource Needs (FTE) Consultant/
Capital Costs City Project Coordinator- Storm Drains City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance Worker City Storm Drain Maintenance Worker - Temporary Vactor Truck Operator City Assistant Director of Public Works City Environmental Compliance Manager City Attorney City Inspector City Storm Water Management Program Coordinator FY 22/23 $50,000 0.45 0.1 0.05 0.08 -- 0.08 0.04 0.02 -- 0.20 FY 23/24 $300,000 0.15 -- 0.30 0.30 -- 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 24/25 $1,650,000 0.15 0.02 0.50 0.50 -- 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 25/26 $500,000 0.15 0.10 0.82 0.90 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 26/27 $810,000 0.10 0.05 1.07 1.15 0.15 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 27/28 $900,000 0.10 0.05 1.31 1.48 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 28/29 $200,000 -- -- 1.41 1.58 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 29/30 $910,000 -- -- 1.51 1.68 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 30/31 -- -- -- 1.51 1.68 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 Total Capital $5,320,000

Average FTE/FY 0.12 0.04 0.94 1.04 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.20 0.07 Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 41

5. References
BASMAA (2017). Tracking California’s Trash Project: Evaluation of the On-land Visual Assessment Protocol as a Method to Establish Baseline Levels of Trash and Detect Improvements in Stormwater Quality.

Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association. State Water Resources Control Board Grant Agreement No. 12-420-550. Prepared by EOA, Inc.
http://basmaa.org/Announcements/tracking-cas-trash-on-land-visual-assessments.

EOA, Inc, In prep. Trash Reduction Effectiveness of Curb Inlet Screens. In preparation by EOA. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/City-has-little-love-for-Bigbelly-bins13309542.php#:~:text=The%20cost%20of%20the%20Bigbelly,maintenance%20for%20all%20of%20t hem.
https://www.facebook.com/ReddingPolice/videos/community-work-program-officernowhiring/2169713883149455/ Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-1
Appendix A
City of Redding Baseline Trash Generation Maps and Trash Management Areas (TMAs)
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-2
Overview Map - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).

Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-3
Downtown Area - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).

Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-4
Northern Area - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).

Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-5
Enterprise Area - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).

Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-6
Area along Highway 273 - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).

Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023
Appendix B
Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation
Technical Memorandum
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-

TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM

FEASIBILITY EVALUATION
Technical Memorandum
FINAL
Prepared for:

777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001

Prepared by:

1410 Jackson Street
Oakland, CA 94602
January 2022
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- 2 Purpose of Project
This technical memorandum provides a cost-benefit analysis of installing and maintaining large and small trash full capture systems1 within the City of Redding’s (City) municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) to address trash from Priority Land Use (PLU)2 areas and stormwater trash management goals established in the Statewide Trash Amendment adopted by the State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board). The results of the analysis are intended to provide the City with estimates of the trash reduction benefits and preliminary planning level cost estimates for the installation and maintenance of these systems.

Background
Regulatory Background
On April 7, 2015, the State Water Board adopted Trash Amendments that amend two statewide water quality control plans to include trash control requirements for owners or operators of MS4s (State Water Board 2015).
3 The Trash Amendments will be implemented through NPDES permits, including the Phase II Small MS4 permit (WQ Order 2013-0001-DWQNPDES NO. CAS000004) for which the City is a permittee.

Under the Trash Amendments, and eventually through the reissued Phase II permit, the City is required to reduce the amount of trash discharged to local water bodies from its MS4 to acceptable levels, beginning no later than 2020 and continuing through the next decade (i.e., 2030).

In November 2018, the City submitted its Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) to the State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board), which notified the agency of the City’s intent to implement a combination of full capture systems, multi-benefit projects, institutional controls, and/or other treatment controls to address the trash reduction goals outlined in the Trash Amendments. In the Implementation Plan, the City identified existing and planned stormwater control measures it will implement to address the trash reduction goals. Trash full capture systems are one type of trash control measure City is currently considering implementing.

Priority Land Use (PLU) Areas and Baseline Trash Levels As defined by the Trash Amendments, PLU areas include all land areas draining to an MS4 that are currently developed as high density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed urban, and public transportation stations. In 2018, the City included preliminary information on PLU areas in its Implementation Plan submitted to the State Water Board based on the limited analyses that had been conducted to date. In 2021, the City conducted an additional evaluation of areas initially as PLUs areas.

The evaluation focused on further determining whether areas originally identified as PLU areas were in fact hydrologically connected to the City’s MS4. The evaluation consisted of conducting a more robust analysis using available information on the configuration of the City’s MS4, drainage features on private parcels, land elevation data, and institutional knowledge of City public works staff. Based on the 1 The State Water Board defines a trash full capture system as a single system (or a series of systems) that traps all particles that are 5 mm or greater and has a design treatment capacity that is either: a) of not less than the peak flow rate, Q, resulting from a one-year, one-hour, storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized to, and designed to carry at least the same flows as, the corresponding storm drain (State Water Board 2015).
2 Priority Land Use areas are defined as follows: (1) High-Density Residential: all land uses with at least ten (10) developed dwelling units/acre; (2) Industrial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve product manufacture, storage, or distribution (e.g., manufacturing businesses, warehouses, equipment storage lots, junkyards, wholesale businesses, distribution centers, or building material sales yards); (3) Commercial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve the sale or transfer of goods or services to consumers (e.g., business or professional buildings, shops, restaurants, theaters, vehicle repair shops, etc.); (4) Mixed Urban: land uses where high-density residential, industrial, and/or commercial land uses predominate collectively (i.e., are intermixed); and (5) Public Transportation Stations: facilities or sites where public transit agencies’ vehicles load or unload passengers or goods (e.g., bus stations and stops). 3 These Amendments are found in Appendix E of the “Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California” (ISWEBE Plan) and Appendix D of the “Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California” (Ocean Plan).

Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- 3 outcomes of the 2021 evaluation, the City’s PLU map was revised and, consistent with the Trash Amendments, all areas confirmed to be hydrologically connected to the City’s MS4 were identified as PLU areas. There are 2,725 acres of land area identified as PLU areas. The remaining land area in the City (36,221 acres) has been identified as non-PLU area and therefore is not subject to the Trash Amendments and no trash reductions are required from these non-PLU areas.

As allowed by the Trash Amendments, the City may have the opportunity to address trash from a nonPLU areas as a substitute for addressing trash in a PLU area as long as the non-PLU area generates an equal or greater level of trash than the PLU area be substituted for (see Implementation Plan for additional information). For the purposes of the analysis presented in this technical memo, however, trash reductions associated with non-PLU areas were not considered given that the baseline trash generation levels for non-PLU areas have yet to be established. The City may choose to account for trash reductions associated with non-PLUs as trash full capture systems are installed.

The stormwater trash management goal established by the Trash Amendments is address trash from PLU areas by either: Track 1) installing and maintaining trash full capture systems in the MS4 that receives drainage from PLU areas; or Track 2) implementing a combination of trash controls that achieve an equivalent level of trash management in PLU areas. As described its Implementation Plan, the City has chosen the Track 2 approach. As such, the City established a baseline trash level for each PLU area based on the results of multiple On-land Visual Trash Assessments (OVTAs) conducted by City staff and consultants. As illustrated on the City’s trash generation map, the levels of trash generation observed via OVTAs is depicted as four categories – low, moderate, high, and very high. The levels of baseline trash generation for PLU areas are provided in Table 1.4To provide a higher level of geographical resolution for trash control measure planning and tracking progress, the City’s PLU areas were divided into 15 Trash Management Areas (TMAs) numbered 1 through 15. Baseline trash generation illustrated in Table 1 are presented by TMA. These TMAs are the geographical areas used to evaluate the costs and benefits of installing and maintaining full capture systems.

As described in the City’s Implementation Plan, the estimated baseline volume of trash generated annually per acre of PLU area is being used as the basis for calculating progress towards the goal of the Trash Amendments. The estimated baseline volume of trash generated from PLU areas in the City is calculated using: 1) the trash generation categories illustrated on the City’s baseline trash generation maps depicting trash generating areas (see Appendix A); and 2) the annual average trash generation rates that were developed in San Francisco Bay Area (BASMAA 2014) and are being used by the City. Based on the results of the Tracking California’s Trash project (BASMAA 2017) that was funded by the State Water Board, the trash generation rates established by BASMAA (2014) correspond well to OVTA scoring categories (A/B/C/D) and the associated trash generation categories (Low/Moderate/High/Very High).

Average annual trash generation rates in gallons per acre established by BASMAA (2017) are as follows:

Low = 0 (i.e., achieved the goal of the Trash Amendments); Moderate = 7.5; High = 30; and Very High = 100. These average trash generation rates were assigned to all PLU areas depicted on City baseline trash generation maps to establish an estimated baseline volume of trash generated annually in City PLU areas.

Using the average rates above and the baseline trash generation levels shown in Table 1, it is estimated that approximately 7,253 gallons of trash are generated from moderate trash generating areas and 22,320 gallons from high trash generating areas in the City, totaling 29,573 gallons of trash generated annually. There are no very high trash generating areas in the City and as described in the previous 4 Following the reevaluation of PLU areas within the City in 2021, a plan was developed to reassess PLU areas for baseline trash generation. The impetus for the reassessment was based on staff observations that OVTA protocols for some areas in the City may not have been explicitly followed during the initial assessments conducted in 2017/2018, which may have resulted in inaccurate trash generation levels illustrated on the City’s baseline trash generation map submitted to the State Water Board with its Track 2 Implementation Plan. The baseline trash generation levels depicted in Table 1 and used in this memorandum are based on the results of the baseline reassessment conducted in 2021.

Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- 4 paragraph, PLU areas that have achieved low trash generation are assumed to have achieved the Trash Amendments goal and therefore generate no trash (for the purpose of measuring trash reduction progress).

Using the average trash generation rates and categories described above, the estimated volume of trash intercepted by full capture systems or prevented/ intercepted by other trash control measures will be used to demonstrate progress towards Trash Amendment. For full capture systems, this is done by quantifying the geographical extent of PLU areas and associated levels of trash generation that have been addressed (i.e., treated) by these devices. Percent trash reductions for full capture systems are calculated by dividing the estimated volume of trash addressed by the devices, by the baseline trash volume developed based on the trash generation maps (i.e., 29,573 gallons). The following equation is used to calculate the percent trash reduction via full capture systems:

Potential Trash Full Capture Systems
A trash full capture system is defined as a single device (or a series of systems) that traps all particles that are 5 mm or greater and has a design treatment capacity that is either: a) of not less than the peak flow rate, Q, resulting from a one-year, one-hour, storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized to, and designed to carry at least the same flows as, the corresponding storm drain. In 2017, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) developed an initial list of certified full trash capture systems that may be installed to comply with the Trash Amendments. This list has been subsequently updated and will continue to be updated based on the certification process outlined by the State Water Board. Descriptions of the general types of certified systems are provided in Appendix B. Certified systems include larger “end-of-pipe” and “in-line” hydrodynamic, netting and screening systems, and smaller screening systems installed in storm drain inlets or catch basins. The number and types of potential large and small systems identified for each TMA are described in the following sections.

X 100
Estimated Volume of Trash (gallons) Intercepted via
Trash Full Capture Systems
Estimated Volume of Trash (gallons) Generated in all PLU areas Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- 5 Table 1. City of Redding Priority Land Use (PLU) and Non-PLU areas (acres) in each baseline trash generation category.

Trash
Management
Area
(TMA)
Baseline Trash Generating PLU Areas (acres)
Estimated Baseline Trash Generation
from PLU Areas
Non-PLU Areas
(acres)
Total Area
(PLU and NonLow Moderate High Total PLU) Annual Generation (gallons)
Proportion of
Annual Generation
(%)
1 108 201 131 440 5,438 19.4% 1,223 1,663
2 46 15 19 80 683 2.0% 434 514
3 61 127 265 453 8,903 22.9% 306 759
4 67 149 68 284 3,158 12.7% 145 429
5 69 37 50 156 1,778 5.1% 405 561
6 56 70 63 189 2,415 7.8% 664 853
7 142 226 64 432 3,615 17.0% 1,361 1,793
8 67 98 54 219 2,355 8.9% 1,344 1,563
9 20 9 -- 29 68 0.5% 435 464
10 167 4 24 195 750 1.6% 436 631
11 10 6 -- 16 45 0.4% 198 214
12 1 1 -- 2 8 0.1% 156 158
13 40 4 1 45 60 0.3% 113 158
14 66 7 -- 73 53 0.4% 1,200 1,273
15 94 13 5 112 248 1.1% 27,804 27,916
Totals 1,014 967 744 2,725 29,573 100.0% 36,221 38,946
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR 6 Large Full Capture System Locations
Potential locations for large full capture systems were identified through a combination of desktop analyses and preliminary field visits to potential sites. These efforts identified stormwater catchments (i.e., land areas draining to a discharge point to a surface water body) that are >10 acres in size and have PLU areas within their boundaries, as documented on the City’s baseline trash generation map. The boundaries of each stormwater catchment were delineated using available information on the City’s storm drain network and contour elevations. One or more locations to potentially site a large full capture system within each catchment were then identified based on a combination of Google Street View and GIS data.

The process described above identified 30 potential locations for large full capture systems. These locations are in six (6) of the City’s fifteen (15) TMAs (i.e., TMAs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7). Detailed maps of each of these potential locations are provided in Appendix C. The land areas draining to these 30 locations form the primary areas of analyses that were used to conduct the cost-benefit evaluation for large full capture systems and compare against a small full capture system approach. These 30 catchments cover 59% of the City’s PLU areas with moderate or high levels of trash generation.

While some TMAs only had one feasible large full capture system location identified, others had multiple locations. Each of the potential large full capture system locations were assigned an identification based on 1) the associated TMA (e.g., 1, 2, 3); 2) the main catchment within that TMA (i.e., A, B or C); and 3) an option number (ascending from upstream to downstream).

The catchments for each of the 30 potential large full capture system locations are shown in Table 2. The number of bus stops in each catchment is also shown. For the purposes of calculating trash reduction benefit, each bus stop is assumed to cover 200 square feet.

Since catchments boundaries for each potential large capture system location are based on stormwater hydrology and the configuration of the City’s storm drain system, not land use, each potential location drains both PLU and non-PLU areas. For small capture systems, it was also assumed that both PLU and non-PLU areas would be addressed. For the purposes of the analysis conducted in this technical memo, however, trash reduction benefits associated with non-PLUs were not considered. Table 2 summarizes the PLU areas that would be addressed should a large full capture system be constructed at the locations identified.

Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost- 7 Table 2. PLU and Non-PLU land area (acres) with low, moderate or high trash generation in seven Trash Management Areas (TMAs) that would be addressed by potential large trash full capture systems in 30 primary stormwater catchments in the City of Redding.

TMA Catchment ID Optiona
PLU Area (acres)
Non-PLU
Area (acres)
# Bus Stops Total Area
(acres)b
Low Mod High Total Total Low Mod High
1 FTC01A -- 4 18 7 28 107 1 3 1 135
FTC01B -- 6 29 37 72 52 0 3 3 124
FTC01C
1 39 68 62 169 382 4 8 3 551
2 33 39 56 128 299 2 5 3 427
3 22 34 56 112 270 1 4 3 382
4 19 20 37 76 248 1 3 3 324
2 FTC02A -- 14 6 14 34 95 1 2 1 129
3 FTC03A
1 34 33 62 128 117 1 7 7 245
2 8 3 0 11 8 0 2 0 19
3 15 4 52 70 90 1 1 6 160
4 6 5 9 20 13 0 2 1 33
FTC03B
1 0 6 31 36 33 0 1 3 69
2 0 6 31 36 33 0 1 3 69
FTC03C -- 19 10 27 57 34 0 2 2 91
FTC03D -- 0 0 8 8 2 0 0 0 10
4 FTC04A
1 3 31 5 39 15 0 3 1 54
2 3 31 5 39 12 0 3 1 51
FTC04B
1 18 25 7 50 93 0 1 1 143
2 17 22 4 43 82 0 1 0 125
FTC04C -- 0 33 9 42 8 0 1 1 50
FTC04D -- 46 24 7 77 20 6 1 0 97
FTC04E -- 66 166 166 398 586 11 10 13 984
6 FTC06A
1 7 18 12 37 223 2 2 3 260
2 4 4 5 13 71 0 1 1 84
3 3 13 7 23 135 2 0 2 158
7 FTC07A -- 2 22 11 34 121 0 3 0 155
FTC07B
1 2 17 8 27 54 1 2 1 81
2 2 10 3 15 49 1 1 0 64
3 0 5 3 8 3 0 1 1 11
FTC07C -- 1 18 5 23 95 0 0 0 118
a Options for each of the catchments may overlap and therefore address the same areas. b
For the purposes of calculating trash reduction benefit, each bus stop is assumed to cover 200 square feet or 0.0046 acres.

Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503 (9.11(f)--Consider the COR 8 Small Full Capture System Locations
Small trash full capture systems (e.g., connector pipe screens or catch basin inserts) are installed in storm drain inlets or catch basins and are alternatives to large trash capture systems. Locations for potential small capture systems were identified using the storm drain system network geodatabase provided by the City. From these GIS maps, all publicly owned catch basins receiving trash from adjacent moderate or high trash generating areas were evaluated. For publicly owned catch basins that are hydraulically connected to each other (i.e., daisy-chained), some upstream catch basins were excluded from the analysis because a downstream small capture system would likely treat the associated upstream area.

Additionally, publicly owned catch basins in low trash generating areas, that appear to not be functional or are abandoned, do not have good access were excluded from the analysis. Privately owned catch basins were also not included as part of the analysis due to limited GIS data on their locations.

Based on the GIS analysis, a total of 655 publicly owned catch basins inlets that address trash from PLU areas were identified as potential locations for small trash full capture systems in the City. The catch basins identified are in all 15 TMAs and include those on California State Highway segments that drain PLU areas. A full list of the catch basins identified for consideration of small full capture systems and their locations are provided in Appendix D. Of these 655 inlets, 428 are located within the stormwater catchments associated with the 30 potential large capture system locations described in the previous section. The costs and benefits of installing and maintaining the small full capture systems within these 30 catchments are compared to the installation and maintenance of large systems. Costs and benefits associated with installing/maintaining small full capture systems in the 227 inlets that drain moderate or high trash generation PLU areas that are located outside of the 30 catchments are also presented. The number of inlets identified for potential small full capture systems in each TMA are listed in Table 3.