Redding City Council
November 7, 2023

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA
November 7, 2023
6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MICHAEL DACQUISTO
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Jen McCloskey, Redding Police and Redding Fire Departments' Chaplain C. Roll Call

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.org or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council November 7, 2023

4(a). Approve Minutes: Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023; Special Meeting – Closed Session of October 17, 2023; and Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023. 4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 and 3; and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
4(c). Adopt Ordinance No. 2666, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.42 (Redding Municipal Library) designating the City of Redding as Fiscal Agent for the Redding Municipal Library Fund.

4.1(b). Adopt Resolution approving City Council Policy No. 222 – Electronic Signature Policy to permit the use of electronic signatures, in lieu of manual or “wet” signatures in designated City of Redding-related business transactions and contracts.

4.2(a). Approve and authorize the following for the City of Redding Airports Division:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 16th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating revenues in the amount of $199,660 for purchase of a boarding ramp and an air service development contract from proceeds of the land sale located at 6550 Lockheed Drive, Redding, CA 96002; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to appropriate the remaining $64,168.50 from the land sale and to execute any agreements necessary to implement projects funded through these appropriations.

4.2(c). Approve and authorize the following actions related to the Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program to assist with the South City Park Redevelopment Project:
(1) Adopt Resolution accepting a Section 108 Program Loan, pledging the City of Redding’s general fund ($240,000) as security, and authorizing the City Manager to execute a United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 108 Contract, Note, and related documents containing that pledge;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 19th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $2,698,000 for the revised Section 108 Program funding of the South City Park Project and establishing a Section 108 payment guarantee for Fiscal year 2023-24; (3) Find that applying for and accepting grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and (4) Find that applying for and accepting grant funding is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act under Title 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Redding City Council November 7, 2023

4.3(a). Authorize the following actions relative to the Rural and Municipal Utility Cybersecurity (RMUC) Advanced Cybersecurity Technology (ACT) 1 Prize Program:
(1) Authorize the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to submit a commitment to competing in the RMUC ACT 1 Prize Program; and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to appropriate the RMUC ACT 1 Prize Program funding, if awarded.

4.5(a). Authorize the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5401, 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit for the Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Award Bid Group I (115kV circuit switchers and support structures) and exercise the City’s purchase option for Bid Group II (Spare parts: seismic analysis item 1 and seismic analysis item 2) to Southern States, LLC for an evaluated price of $563,429.38;
(2) Authorize an additional project amount of $141,000 (25 percent of the Contract amount) for additional materials to complete the project and project contingency;
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve project construction change orders up to and not to exceed the total project budget; and (4) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 18th Amendment to City Budget Resolution 2023-060 appropriating $204,500 for increased costs of materials and supplies for the Substation Circuit Switchers capital project.

4.5(b). Approve setting a Public Hearing on December 5, 2023, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider increases in Redding Electric Utility (REU) rates (four percent revenue increase per year) effective with the January 2024 and January 2025 billing cycles, and an increase in the benefit of REU’s Residential Energy Discount for incomequalified households.

4.6(a). Authorize and approve the following actions related to Bid Schedule No. 5410, Furnishing and Delivering Four, One-Ton Trucks:
(1) Award bid to Crown Motors; and
(2) Authorize the purchase of four, one-ton trucks with a utility body at a net delivered cost of $305,815.05 to replace three older trucks in the City of Redding Parks Division and one in the City of Redding Building Maintenance Division.

4.6(b). Authorize the following relative to the Outdoor Equity Grants Program administered by the California Department of Parks and Recreation:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding as an applicant; and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements or augmentations necessary to implement the project.

Redding City Council November 7, 2023

4.6(c). Approve and authorize the following:
(1) Approve and ratify the City of Redding Community Services Department’s submittal of a Boating Access Program grant application in an amount not to exceed $600,000 to provide continued funding assistance for boat ramp and fishing facility operations and maintenance at multiple river access locations; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.

4.7(a). Adopt Resolution authorizing the investment of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund and rescinding Resolution No. 84-262.

4.9(a). Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the Integrated Public Safety Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (C-2756) between the City of Redding, the City of Anderson, the County of Shasta, and Shasta Area Safety Communications Agency (SHASCOM), to define: (a) which specific agencies are considered IPS principal parties to the MOU and their roles; (b) subscribing agencies and how subscribing agency user fees are determined; and (c) adds Section 22, Counterparts/Electronic, Facsimile, and PDF Signatures, which allows for electronic signatures for the MOU.

4.11(a). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals Schedule No. 5387, Construction Management and Inspection Services for the City of Redding Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Project:
(1) Award to GHD, Inc.;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $899,838.27 with GHD, Inc., to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $50,000.

4.11(b). Adopt Resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application by the City of Redding (City) to the State Water Resources Control Board Drinking Water State Revolving Fund; and, should the grant be awarded, authorize the Mayor to execute a Consolidation and Water Service Agreement with the Cascade Racquet Club Mutual Water Company for connection to the City’s water system.

4.11(c). Approve the sole source purchase of all Department Variable Frequency Drives and find that the name of Yaskawa Variable Frequency Drives in the specifications for Public Works projects is authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2) in order to match other products in use by the City of Redding Public Works Department.

4.11(d). Authorize and approve the sole source procurement of two Stratus Fault Tolerant server systems in an amount not to exceed $250,000 for the City of Redding Water Utility.

Redding City Council November 7, 2023

4.12(a). Adopt Resolution approving an amended Appendix A (Designated Positions) to the City of Redding’s Conflict of Interest Code, Redding Municipal Code Chapter 2.90 (Conflict of Interest for designated positions of the City), in compliance with the California Fair Political Practices Commission biennial review requirements.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A court challenge to action taken by the City Council on any project or decision may be limited to only those issues raised during the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council during, or prior to, the public hearing.

Public Works

6.1. Public Hearing to consider adopting three Resolutions regarding implementing increased Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste Utility Rates.

Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, if no majority protest exists, adopt three Resolutions implementing increased Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste Utility rates and a new commercial source-separated food waste collection rate for the Solid Waste Utility, all to be effective January 1, 2024.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
City Manager

9.1(a). Consider Redding Rodeo Association's lease extension request.

Recommendation:

Accept the report and consider amending the Lease Agreement (C-141) approving a three-year lease extension to August 1, 2029, with an updated construction schedule as requested by the Redding Rodeo Association; and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment and any additional documentation as required to complete the transaction.

Redding City Council November 7, 2023

Assistant City Manager

9.2(b). Consider Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program funding award recommendations.

Recommendation:

Authorize the following actions relative to the Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program:
(1) Approve the fund distribution as recommended and identified in the attached table for funding in the total amount of $2,300,000;
(2) Direct the City Manager, or designee, to award, negotiate and execute agreements with each subrecipient, and allocate the Housing and Homelessness Incentive Program funds; and
(3) Determine that allocating grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Electric Utility

9.5(c). Consider Redding Electric Utility's 2024 Integrated Resource Plan.

Recommendation:

Approve the City of Redding Electric Utility’s 2024 Integrated Resource Plan in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (Senate Bill 350 or “SB 350”); and authorize the Electric Utility Director to modify the Integrated Resource Plan, if necessary, to meet the requirements of the California Energy Commission.

Personnel

9.15(a). Consider Resolution approving Successor Memorandum of Understanding and Salary Exhibits with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 - Electric Department (IBEW – Electric).

Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution approving a successor Memorandum of Understanding and salary exhibits with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 - Electric Department (IBEW–Electric) for a three-year term effective November 7, 2023, and ending November 7, 2026; and approving amendments to the IBEW - Electric Schedule of Wage Rates effective November 12, 2023.

Redding City Council November 7, 2023

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: http://scac.cablecast.tv:8080/CablecastPublicSite/watch/4?channel=1. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the City’s meetings and agendas portal; Click on tab named "Meetings Videos" and select Redding City Council under “Available Archives 2023” select the desired date, then click on “video” to view the meeting.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Minutes: Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023; Special Meeting – Closed Session of October 17, 2023; and Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023.

Attachments
^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of October 17,2023 ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 8
273
09/19/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
September 19, 2023, 6:00 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry E. DeWalt, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Dacquisto.

The Invocation was provided by Lori Moretti, Redding Police and Redding Fire Departments’ Chaplain.

PRESENTATION
2A. Presentation of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District’s (SMVCD) 2022 Annual Report, incorporated herein by reference, by Peter Bonkrude, SMVCD’s District Manager.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item. 2B. City of Redding Senior Marketing Specialist and Visit Redding Advisory Board Member Steven DiPaolo introduced Danny Orloff, Tourism Marketing Director for Visit Redding.

Mr. Orloff provided a quarterly report and shared a short video and PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference, regarding tourism marketing and promotion efforts for the City of Redding.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Alex Bielecki expressed concern with cleaning chemicals affecting fish in the waterways by homeless individuals living nearby.

Robert opined: (1) that the City Council should abandon the idea of submitting a letter to the County of Shasta (County) Board of Supervisors (Supervisors) as legislation is sitting on the Governor’s desk to be reviewed/signed that would significantly alter the current ballot counting process recently approved by the County Supervisors; and (2) spoke in support of a new County Supervisor Chair to be selected in the future.

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:

4.1(a). Accept the report regarding use of the California Correctional Center (Susanville Correctional Facility) with no further action required.

4.2(a). Authorize and approve the following: (1) adopt Resolution No. 2023-091, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving the City of Redding to apply for the Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation through the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development;(2) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign and submit the application, and execute all necessary documents related to Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing funding opportunities; and (3) find that applying for, and accepting, a Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 274
09/19/2023

4.2(b). Authorize and approve the following: (1) authorize the submission of a Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods grant program application in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for planning funds for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Neighborhood; (2) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant application and all applicable documents to complete the application process and if awarded the grant, accept and appropriate the funds accordingly; (3) find that acting in an administrative capacity is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and (4) find that acting in an administrative capacity is an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act.

4.6(a). Approve the Third Amendment to the Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) with the Economic Development Corporation of Shasta County for City of Redding (City)- owned property located at 777 Auditorium Drive, to exercise the last of three, one-year options extending the lease term from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024, for the monthly lease payment to the City in the amount of $3,142.53.

4.8(a). Approve and authorize the following actions: (1) approve the month-to-month lease with Shield Regional Training Consortium in the amount of $241.50 per month for one office space located at 4300 Caterpillar Road for the Redding Fire Department's (RFD) Battalion Chief of Training; and (2) authorize RFD’s Chief to execute the lease and any other documents to complete the transaction.

4.8(b). Approve donation of the Redding Fire Department’s obsolete Kenwood mobile radios and Minitor pagers valued at approximately $5,300 to regional fire departments.

4.9(a). Authorize and ratify the submission of an application to the U.S. Department of Justice 2023 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (C-10077) in the amount of $49,198 to fund the purchase of tactical rifles and slings; and authorize the City Manager to sign the grant application's certifications and assurances signifying that the governing body was notified of the application and citizens were provided the opportunity to comment on the application.

4.11(a).Authorize and approve the following actions: (1) accept grant funds from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) on behalf of Centerville Community Services District (CCSD); (2) approve the HMGP Project Agreement with CCSD for the Muletown Pump Station Generator Project; (3) adopt Resolution No. 2023-092, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 12th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $350,000 for the Centerville Generator Project, $225,000 in federal grant funding and $125,000 in local match funds from Redding Electric Utility; and (4) find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

4.11(b).Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals No. 5385, to provide engineering and environmental services for the Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road Roundabout Project: (1) award the Consultant and Professional Services Contract to Dokken Engineering Inc. (C-10062), in an amount not to exceed $1,243,029; (2) authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with Dokken Engineering; and (3) authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $50,000.

4.11(c).Accept update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 275
09/19/2023

4.11(d).Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project: (1) approve the City as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (4) approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match; (5) adopt Resolution No. 2023-093, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City; and (6) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

4.11(e).Authorize and approve the following actions regarding allocation of an awarded federal grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program and regional non-motorized grant funds for the following project: (1) accept the funds in the amount of $240,000 for the Local Road Safety Plan Update; and (2) adopt Resolution No. 2023-094, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 13th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $240,000 for the project.

4.11(f).Approve increases to the project budget in the amount of $475,280 for the completion of Bid Schedule No. 5263, Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Project as follows for additional improvements: (1) increase of $325,280 to the construction management budget, bringing the construction management total to $1,381,280; (2) increase of $150,000 to the construction contingency budget, bringing the construction contingency total to $780,000; and (3) authorize staff to negotiate and the City Manager to execute an Amendment to the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement with Ghiradelli Associates (C-9199) to increase the fee for construction management and inspection services in an amount not to exceed $200,000.

4.11(g).Authorize the following actions relative to a proposal to provide engineering services for Instrumentation, Control, Programming, and Electrical Design Services for the City of Redding Water Utility: (1) award a Consulting and Professional Services Contract to TJC and Associates, Inc. (C-9982), in an amount not to exceed $155,000; (2) authorize the City Manager to execute the Contract and approve future contract amendments up to $30,000; and (3) find that contract approval is not a project defined by the California Environmental Quality Act.

4.11(h).Authorize the following actions relative to the sole-source procurement of Solid Waste Collection Vehicle refurbishment services for five existing units in the City of Redding Solid Waste Utility: (1) approve the sole-source procurement to Terrific Trucks & Equipment using Rolling Stock Funds in an amount not to exceed $910,000; and (2) find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 – Existing Facilities.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, and/or authorized as recommended.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
Resolution Nos. 2023-091 through 2023-094 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 276
09/19/2023
REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

9.1(b). Report - submission of letter to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors regarding the County Elections ballot counting process.

City Manager Barry Tippin highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

Alex Belecki opined that the Shasta County Board of Supervisors are not listening to the people and someone needs to stand up to them.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

Mayor Dacquisto stated for the record that he will not sign the letter as he does not agree with its content.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Dacquisto to accept the report and direct staff to not submit a letter to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors regarding the County Elections counting process.

The motion failed due to lack of a second.

A SECOND MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, and seconded by Council Member Munns, to accept the report and directed staff to submit the letter to be signed by Mayor Pro Tempore Tenessa Audette, to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors regarding the County Elections ballot counting process.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Munns, Winter
NOES: Council Members – Mezzano, and Dacquisto
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

9.2(c). City of Redding to serve as the NorCal Continuum of Care's Administrative Entity.

City Manager Barry Tippin highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

In response to Mayor Dacquisto, Mr. Tippin stated that he did not know what the County’s reasoning was to decline, however, they did provide a 60-day notice and vacated their position as lead agency.

City Attorney Dewalt noted that the City will perform its due diligence and prepare a risk analysis with regard to liability, and has already asked for information from the County’s Counsel for that analysis, prior to any documents being signed.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano , seconded by Council Member Winter, to: (1) authorize the City of Redding to serve as the interim Administrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care for a two-year term; (2) authorize the City Manager to negotiate and sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the NorCal Continuum of Care’s Executive Board outlining the respective roles and responsibilities of the City of Redding as the NorCal Continuum of Care’s Administrative Entity; (3) authorize the City Manager to submit applications or documents necessary to apply to the State of California for the Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention grant, or other grants that become available on behalf of the NorCal Continuum of Care, and appropriate funds received; (4) find that acting in an administrative capacity is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and (5) find that acting in an administrative capacity is an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 277
09/19/2023

9.5(a). Redding Electric Utility's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Financial Report, Industry Activities Update, and Power Content Label.

Electric Utility Assistant DirectorJoe Bowers summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Audette, to accept Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Financial Report, Industry Activities Update, and Power Content Label. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.5(b). Oral report – providing an update regarding status of Redding Electric Utility resources.

Electric Utility Assistant Director Joe Bowers provided an overview of the Report to the City Council (staff report), and a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference, regarding the following: Legislative updates & requirements; 2024 Integrated Resource Plan; Carbon Capture Sequestration; and the Extended Day Ahead Market.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

9.6(b). Oral report - 2023 Community Creek Clean-Up.

Community Services Senior Project Coordinator Travis Menne highlighted the Report to the City Council (staff report), and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference. He noted that this is the 17th Annual Community Creek Cleanup, and everyone can sign up to volunteer from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. on Saturday, October 7, 2023, at the following: www.shastacreeks.com.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to accept the report regarding the 2023 Community Creek Clean-Up to be held on October 7, 2023, on the Sacramento River Trail, 975 North Market Street, Redding.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.10(a).City of Redding year end budget review for fiscal year ending 2023; and Resolution approving adjustments.

City Treasurer/Finance Director Greg Robinett summarized the Report to the City Council (staff report), and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to accept the Year End Budget Report for the City of Redding; and adopt Resolution No. 2023-095, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 96th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 increasing appropriations by $4,429,640 for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
Resolution No. 2023-095 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

9.11(i). Ordinance - update Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.28 (Solid Waste and Recycling), relating to the establishing of criteria for recovery and disposal of edible food.

Public Works Deputy Director Paul Clemens highlighted the Report to the City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 278
09/19/2023
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to authorize and approve the following actions to comply with state mandated legislation for the City of Redding Solid Waste Utility: (1) offer Ordinance 2664, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.28 (Solid Waste and Recycling), by amending Section 9.28.010 (Definitions) and adding Section 9.28.275 (Commercial Edible Food Generators) for first reading by title only, and waive the full reading; (2) find that the passage of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“Common Sense Exemption”) because it can be seen with certainty that passage of the ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance according to law.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
City Attorney DeWalt read the title of Ordinance No. 2664 and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

9.14(a).Design Immunity Ordinance relative to the City Engineer's existing authority.

City Attorney DeWalt summarized the Report to the City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference. He noted that adoption of this ordinance will codify existing authority exercised by the City Engineer and more readily facilitate the City Attorney’s ability to defend lawsuits based on the affirmative defense of design immunity.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Audette, seconded by Council Member Winter, to: (1) Offer Ordinance No. 2665, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.28 (City Engineer), by adding Section 2.28.060 (Approval of Plans, Specifications and Designs) for first reading by title only and waive the full reading; (2) authorize the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance and the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with law; and (3) find that adoption of the proposed ordinance is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
City Attorney DeWalt read the title of Ordinance No. 2665 and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 7:56 p.m. Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 285
10/17/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
October 17, 2023, 5:15 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, and Jack Munn. Council Member Julie Winter was absent.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry E. DeWalt, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:15 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 6:00 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Property Location: 7501 Eastside Road; Assessor’s Parcel No. 050-040-010 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Tippin
Negotiating Parties: City of Redding and Haven Humane Society Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3B. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) & (e)(3):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation
Claim Nos. 24-002-610 (Property-Vehicle) and 23-073-610 (Personal Injury) by Christopher Embury, for personal injury and property damage sustained in an accident with a City of Redding vehicle on March 21, 2023.

Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3C. Closed session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957(b):

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
City Attorney
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 5:56 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of October 17,2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 286
10/17/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
October 17, 2023, 6:00 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, and Jack Munns. Council Member Julie Winter was absent.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates.

At Mayor Dacquisto’s suggestion, the City Council observed a moment of silence for peace in the Middle East.

PRESENTATION
2A. Resolution honoring Police Chief William Schueller on his retirement from the City of Redding.

Mayor Dacquisto highlighted Mr. Schueller’s accomplishments and presented the Resolution to him.

City Manager Tippin, along with Council Members Mezzano, Audette, and Munns, expressed their appreciation for Chief Schueller’s commitment and dedication to the City of Redding.

Chief Schueller thanked the community, the City Council, and staff of the City of Redding.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Dacquisto, seconded by Council Member Munns, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-103, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, honoring William Schueller for his distinguished service as the City of Redding’s Chief of Police.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Winter
Resolution No. 2023-103 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 2B. Laurie Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Redding Tourism Marketing Group, and General Manager of the Shasta Cascade Wonderland Association, provided a PowerPoint presentation, incorporated herein by reference, and an update regarding its tourism and marketing efforts within the City of Redding.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item. 2C. On behalf of the Tobacco Education Coalition, comprised of members from Youth Options, Shasta County Office of Education, Shasta County Public Health, United Way, and others, Youth Action Council (Youth Options of Shasta) Member Caitlin provided a PowerPoint presentation, incorporated herein by reference, regarding density of tobacco establishments, youth access and use, within the City of Redding.

The following spoke in support of having a healthier community: Wendy Dickens with First Five Shasta. Kalie Brisbon, Senior Director of Programs with United Way of Northern California, Nancy Shifflet, (registered Nurse), Esther Craig (parent), and Cathy Grindstaff, Project Director with Shasta County Chemical People.

Kristen Schreder asked the City Council to bring this item back at a future meeting for discussion.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 287
10/17/2023
2D. Mayor Dacquisto presented a Mayor’s Proclamation, incorporated herein by reference, to Shasta Youth Options for its Shasta County Youth Peer Court program, designating October 2023 as Global Youth Justice Month in the City of Redding.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Monique Welin and Kristy Klenitz asked the Council for help with to make hospice services available for the homeless.

Matthew Meyer and Randy McGinnis spoke on behalf of the Pilots Association regarding the dilapidated conditions at the Redding Regional Airport and Benton Air Park.

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:
4(a). Approve Minutes: Special Meeting of October 2, 2023. 4(c). Adopt Ordinance No. 2664, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.28 (Solid Waste and Recycling) by amending Section 9.28.010 (Definitions) and adding Section 9.28.275 (Commercial Edible Food Generators), relating to the establishing of criteria for recovery and disposal of edible food.
4(d). Adopt Ordinance No. 2665, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.28 (City Engineer) by adding Section 2.28.060 (Approval of Plans, Specifications and Designs) relating to codifying existing authority in the City Engineer to exercise discretion in the approval of plans, specifications and design of all public improvements.

4.1(a). Adopt the Redding Tourism Marketing Group 2023-24 Annual Report.

4.6(a). Accept the Federal Lands Access Program funded improvements to Kum Bay Xerel Open Space as satisfactorily completed (C-7357); and authorize the City Manager to execute any documents required for acceptance and project close out.

4.8(a). Approve and authorize the following actions: (1) approve re-appropriation of American Rescue Plan Act funds from the Redding Fire Department rolling stock to allow for the use of the funds to install a Fire Station Alerting system throughout all eight Fire Stations and Headquarters to reduce response times in the City of Redding and comply with National Fire Protection Association 1225 guidelines; and (2) adopt Resolution No. 2023-104, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, adopting and approving the 17th Amendment to Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 re-appropriating $1,000,000 in ARPA funds for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

4.9(a). Approve and ratify the purchase of 18 police vehicles from John Jones Automotive Group in the amount of $823,575 for the Redding Police Department.

4.11(a).Accept Bid Schedule No. 5286 (Job No. 2667), East Cypress Avenue Storm Drain Replacement Project, awarded to Northstate Earth and Water, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $527,467.02.

4.11(b).Accept Bid Schedule No. 5333 (Job No. 2608), Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project, awarded to Mitchell Johnson Construction, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $982,304.40.

Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 288
10/17/2023

4.11(c).Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2023-01030): (1) adopt Resolution No. 2023-105, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, summarily vacating a Public Service Easement located on Lot 13 and 14 of the Seven Bridges Subdivision Phase 2 as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B; (2) find the action consistent with the General Plan; and (3) find the action categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15035 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations.

4.11(d).Accept Bid Schedule No. 5183 (Job No. 2611), Girvan Road Railroad Crossing Improvements and South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail Project, awarded to Tullis, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $8,469,900.

4.15(a).Accept report recognizing City of Redding employees who have achieved or will achieve 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years of service with the City of Redding as of December 31, 2023.

4.15(b).Adopt Resolution No. 2023-106, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, updating the City of Redding Master Employee Pay Schedule classification titles and pay rates/ranges to comply with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System requirement that all information be consolidated in one master document. The Resolution confirms classification titles and pay rate/range changes that have been approved by the City Council at previous City Council meetings during open session.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, authorized, and/or ratify as recommended.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Winter
Resolution Nos. 2023-102 through 2023-106, and Ordinance Nos. 2664 and 2665, are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

9.1(b). Appointment of Brian T. Barner as Chief of Police of the City of Redding.

City Manager Barry Tippin highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Audette, and Seconded by Council Member Munns to approve the appointment of Brian T. Barner as the Chief of Police of the City of Redding.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Winter
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 289
10/17/2023

9.1(c). Ordinance designating the City of Redding as Fiscal Agent to the Redding Municipal Library.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to: (1) offer Ordinance No. 2666, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.42 (Redding Municipal Library) designating the City of Redding as Fiscal Agent for the Redding Municipal Library Fund for first reading by title only, waive the full reading; (2) authorize the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance, and the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with law; and (3) find that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act guidelines 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3) and further find that the passage of this ordinance will have no foreseeable direct or indirect physical change in the environment.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Winter
City Attorney DeWalt read Ordinance No. 2666 by title only.

9.6(b). Scope change for the Caldwell Park Expansion Project for the City of Redding.

Community Service Director Travis Menne highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report) and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Audette, to approve and authorize the following actions relative to the Caldwell Park Expansion Project funded by a Proposition 68 Statewide Park Development Program grant:
(1) approve the changes to the grant scope; and (2) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to submit the proposed change to the State for approval and to amend the grant agreement, and execute all documents necessary to change the grant’s scope.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Mezzano, Munns, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – Winter

COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
Council Member Mezzano attended the Sacramento Valley Division CitiPAC Cornhole Tournament on October 13, 2023, in Sacramento, California.

SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS FOR

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
At Council Member Mezzano’s suggestion, a consensus of the Council directed staff to review the information provided to Council during the presentation by the Tobacco Education Coalition for discussion and/or consideration at a future Council meeting regarding density of tobacco establishments and potential changes to the City’s Ordinance.

At Council Member Audette’s suggestion, a consensus of the Council directed staff to return to Council with a report providing an update relative to the Benton Airpark Fixed Base Operator search and an overall update relative to both the Redding Regional Airport and Benton Airpark for discussion and/or consideration by the Council at a future Council meeting.

Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 290
10/17/2023

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 7:32 p.m. Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 and 3; and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:

Accounts Payable:
(1) Register No. 2 for the period August 1, 2023 – August 31, 2023, in the amount of $20,735,967.22; and Register No. 3 for the period September 1, 2023 – September 30, 2023, in the amount of $25,646,467.61.

Payroll:
(1) Register No. 3 for the period July 23, 2023 – August 5, 2023, in the amount of $4,561,653.13; Register No. 4 for the period August 6, 2023 – August 19, 2023, in the amount of $4,645,381.10; Register No. 5 for the period August 20, 2023 – September 2, 2023, in the amount of $4,726,233.21; Register No. 6 for the period September 3, 2023 – September 16, 2023, in the amount of $4,834,500.41; and Register No. 7 for the period September 17, 2023 – September 30, 2023, in the amount of $4,576,838.12.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.

Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 21
Report to Redding City Council October 26, 2023
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2 Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Packet Pg. 22
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register Nos. 2 & 3 and Payroll Register Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Ordinance No. 2666, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.42 (Redding Municipal Library) designating the City of Redding as Fiscal Agent for the Redding Municipal Library Fund.

Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2666
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(c)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2666 amending RMC Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) designating the City as Fiscal Agent to Redding Municipal Library Jason Gibilisco, Management
Assistant to the City Manager
Packet Pg. 182
First Reading done: 10/17/2023 BT
For adoption on: 11/07/2023 4-0 (CM Julie Winter absent) CC Agenda Item No. : 4(c)
ORDINANCE NO. 2666

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING REDDING
MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL),
CHAPTER 2.42 (REDDING MUNICIPAL LIBRARY) BY AMENDING
SECTION 2.42.070 (LIBRARY FUND - ESTABLISHED) TO DESIGNATE

THE CITY OF REDDING AS THE FISCAL AGENT FOR THE REDDING

MUNICIPAL LIBRARY FUND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter

2.42 (Redding Municipal Library), Section 2.2442.070 is amended to read as follows:

2.42.070 Library fund—Established.

A fund is established, which shall be designated as the Redding Municipal Library Fund, and all money and revenue received by the treasurer's office for the support of the Redding Municipal Library shall be credited to the Redding Municipal Library Fund. The City of Redding shall act as the fiscal agent for the Redding Municipal Library Fund. The Redding Municipal Library Fund shall be drawn therefrom only as by law and the ordinances of the city provide, but shall only be applied in the operation and maintenance of the library.

Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance.

The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 3. The City of Redding finds that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061(b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment), the adoption of this Ordinance is therefore not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2666 (4(c)--Ordinance No. 2666 - Designating City of Redding as Fiscal Agent to Redding Municipal Library) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 17th day of October, 2023, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting on the 7
th day of November, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney DATE ATTESTED: November ____, 2023
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2666 (4(c)--Ordinance No. 2666 - Designating City of Redding as Fiscal Agent to Redding Municipal Library)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving City Council Policy No. 222 – Electronic Signature Policy to permit the use of electronic signatures, in lieu of manual or “wet” signatures in designated City of Redding-related business transactions and contracts.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to approving an Electronic Signature City Council (Council) Policy. A vendor shall be selected upon Council approval of the Policy. The first-year cost associated with an Electronic Signature Policy related to City of Redding (City)-designated contracts is estimated between $6,000 and $8,000, which would include online support and assistance. Since Fiscal Year 2020-21, the City has processed an average of 459 contracts and 298 amendments annually for a total of 757. If approved, the City of Redding’s (City) Information Technology Department will review annual usage and allocate the costs to each of the City Departments.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to adopt the attached resolution approving the Electronic Signature Policy and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City recognizes that advances in technology can assist in increasing its efficiency, reduction of waste, and ability to provide greater access to public services. Technology advancements have also increased electronic document procedures and management security. This Council Policy will establish the requirements for using electronic signatures in lieu of manual or "wet" signatures and guidelines for acceptable technologies, procedures, and documents for using electronic signatures in City-related business.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(b)--Consider adopting City of Redding Council Policy No. 222 - Electronic Signature Policy
Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 185
Report to Redding City Council November 1, 2023
Re: 4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy Page 2 If approved, Council Policy No. 222 - Electronic Signature will be incorporated into the City Council Policy Manual. The Resolution has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^City Council Electronic Signature Policy No. 222
Packet Pg. 186
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 222 – ELECTRONIC

SIGNATURE POLICY
WHEREAS, the Redding City Council recognizes the advances in technology and security related to an Electronic Signature Policy approved by Council; and WHEREAS, the above Policy is appropriate to better comply with current practices and laws; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of the Electronic Signature Policy can be administered through the Information Technology Department as outlined in the newly proposed City Council Policy No. 222;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding that City Council Policy No. 222 – Electronic Signature Policy is hereby adopted in the form attached hereto and made a part of by reference.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of November, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_______________________________ __________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Electronic Signature Policy

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
2023-XXX 222 1

BACKGROUND
The City of Redding recognizes that advances in technology can assist the City in increasing its efficiency, reduction of waste, and ability to provide greater access to public services.

Technology advancements have also increased electronic document procedures and management security. This Policy establishes the requirements for using electronic signatures in lieu of manual or "wet" signatures and guidelines for acceptable technologies, procedures, and documents for using electronic signatures in City-related business. This Policy shall be used to increase productivity and ensure convenient and timely access to City information by using electronic signature technology to collect and preserve documents quickly, securely, and efficiently. Affixing an electronic signature to a document in a manner consistent with this Policy shall satisfy the City's requirement for signing a document. Although the use of electronic signatures is encouraged when permitted, this Policy does not mandate the use of electronic signatures, nor should the City require that any third party signing a document use electronic signatures.

PURPOSE
The purpose of this Electronic Signature Policy ("Policy") is intended to broadly permit the use of electronic signatures, in lieu of manual or “wet” signatures, in City-related business, since:
• The use of electronic signature technology will allow the City to collect and preserve signatures on documents quickly, securely, and efficiently. • The City has a vital interest in reducing paper waste, increasing the efficient use of public resources, and ensuring the security and authenticity of electronic records, including electronic signatures.
• The City seeks to mitigate the risks associated with conducting transactions, transmitting information, and maintaining public records that use electronic signatures.

Legal Authority
Under California Law (Civ. Code section 1633.1 et seq.), electronic signatures have the same legal effect as wet or manual signatures. A digital signature is a form of electronic signature.

Government Code Section 16.5 specifically permits cities to use digital signatures. Government Code section 16.5 also provides that, for a digital signature to have the same force and effect as a wet or manual signature, it must be established that the digital signature is:

Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: ^City Council Electronic Signature Policy No. 222 (4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Electronic Signature Policy

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
2023-XXX 222 2

1. Unique to the person using it.

2. Capable of verification.

3. Under the sole control of the person usingit.

4. Linked to data in such a manner that if the data is changed, the digital signature is invalidated.

5. Conforms to regulations adopted by the Secretary ofState.

POLICY
This Policy applies to documents requiring a signature of any person where the signature is intended to show authorship, approval, authorization, or certification, as permitted by law.

This Policy shall apply to all employees of the City and governs all uses of electronic signatures used to conduct the City’s official business. Such business may include, but not be limited to, electronic communications, transactions, contracts, permits, and other official purposes, internal and external to the City. All use of digital signatures by the City shall be in accordance with this Policy, and may be amended from time to time by the City Manager.

Any use of electronic signatures, including digital signatures, by the City that is not in accordance with this Policy, or any unauthorized signing of any record or document, shall render such form or document invalid as not fully and properly executed by the City.

It is the policy of the City to encourage, but not require, the use of digital signatures only in all internal and external activities, documents, and transactions where it is permitted by law, and where existing technology permits.

Only digital signatures meeting the requirement of Government Code Section 16.5 and 2 California Code of Regulations Section 22000 et seq. are permitted. This means that the digital signature must be unique to the person authorizing it and must require the use of an individual username and password in order to execute. No other form of electronic signature may be accepted. To that end, the following forms of electronic signature are specifically prohibited:
• No permit, agreement, or contract may be made by exchange of email, text, or other electronic means of communication.
• Copies of manual signatures are not acceptable.
• Proxy signatures shall not be accepted. This means that no City employee will share a username or password signature with another person, nor shall a City employee accept a digital signature which he/she knows, or has reason to believe, was not personally executed by the counter-party.

No party that does business with the City shall be required to use a digital signature.

Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: ^City Council Electronic Signature Policy No. 222 (4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Electronic Signature Policy

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
2023-XXX 222 3
Where a transaction requires the signature of both parties to the transaction, the use of a digital signature must be agreed upon by both parties to the transaction. If the parties have agreed to conduct a transaction by digital signature, the parties are required to utilize all applicable security processes for authentication.

When all parties electronically sign a document, the City will provide a copy of the electronically signed document to the other parties in an electronic format that is capable of being retained and printed by the other parties.

The Chief Information Officer shall be responsible for determining acceptable technologies and digital signature certification providers consistent with current legal requirements and industry best practices to ensure the security and integrity of the data and the digital signature. The Chief Information Officer shall not accept any technology which is not compliant with the requirements set forth in Civil Code Section 16.5 and 2 California Code of Regulations 22000 et seq. The final approval of any electronic signature technologies and vendors will be by the Chief Information Officer, after consulting with the City Attorney.

In determining whether to approve electronic signature technologies offered by vendors, consideration will be given to the systems and procedures associated with using that electronic signature, industry best practices, and whether using the electronic signature is at least as reliable as the existing method to ensure the security and integrity of the data and the signature. The Chief Information Officer shall conduct periodic reviews for the appropriateness and continued applicability of electronic signature technologies and vendors.

If it is determined that an approved electronic signature technology or vendor is, in the discretion of the Chief Information Officer, no longer trustworthy, the Chief Information Officer may revoke the approval of the electronic signature method. In such a case, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Attorney and, where deemed necessary, take steps to see that any records signed with the revoked electronic signature method are signed again either with a written signature or with an approved electronic signature method.

Manual, or “wet” signatures are required for the following transactions:
• Documents or transactions that require notarization or are to be recorded with the County Recorder
• Documents required for real property transactions
• Documents that affect title to real property
• Bonds (unless express authority is granted by the City Attorney’s Office) • Promissory notes
• Documents or transactions that are not signed using approved electronic/digital signatures technologies and/or vendors
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: ^City Council Electronic Signature Policy No. 222 (4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Electronic Signature Policy

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
2023-XXX 222 4
Notwithstanding the requirements set forth above relating to the use of a digital signature for transactions between the City of Redding and third persons, any form of electronic signature, as defined by Civil Code Section 1633.2, is acceptable for internal use. Examples include memos, reports, request forms, and other documents used to conduct business within and between City departments and staff. The use of an electronic signature is acceptable for Internal Documents, provided that appropriate safeguards are observed, as determined by the City Manager or designee. Except as may otherwise be authorized by the City Attorney, for all transactions in which a third party will be using a digital signature, excluding any transaction with a state or federal agency, the following language shall be incorporated into the terms and conditions of the transaction and shall be given a section number as appropriate within the contract.
• Electronic Signatures.
• Electronic Signature means any electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with a record and executed and adopted by a party with the intent to sign a document or record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means.
• Except as otherwise provided in the Agreement or as otherwise required by law, the Parties hereby consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures as the alternative to paper documents and manual signatures. • The Parties agree that the electronic signatures, whether digital or encrypted, by their respective signatories are intended to authenticate such signatories and to give rise to a valid, enforceable, and fully effective agreement and have the same force and effect as manual signatures.
• The Parties represent the following:
▪ Their respective signatories have the authority to sign this Agreement, and no certification authority or other third-party verification is necessary to validate their electronic signatures, and the lack of such certification or third-party verification will not in any way affect the enforceability of the electronic signatures or any resulting agreement between the Parties.
▪ An electronic signature of their respective signatory is unique to the person using it, capable of verification, under the sole control of the person using it, and is linked to data in such a manner that if the data is changed, the electronic signature is invalidated, and conforms to regulations adopted by the California Secretary of State as may be amended from time to time.

Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: ^City Council Electronic Signature Policy No. 222 (4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Electronic Signature Policy

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
2023-XXX 222 5
• Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all demands, liabilities, expenses, losses, causes of action, claims, obligations, judgments, or damages, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation, arising from the falsity or breach of any Contractor’s representation, whether or not the falsity or breach is caused by the Contractor’s active or passive negligence, contained in this section of the Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

In the event the counter-party does not accept the language set forth above as a term and condition of the transaction, the parties may transact business only by use of a manual, or “wet”, signature.

Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: ^City Council Electronic Signature Policy No. 222 (4.1(b)--Adopt Resolution creating Electronic Signature Council Policy)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following for the City of Redding Airports Division:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the 16th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023- 060 appropriating revenues in the amount of $199,660 for purchase of a boarding ramp and an air service development contract from proceeds of the land sale located at 6550 Lockheed Drive, Redding, CA 96002; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to appropriate the remaining $64,168.50 from the land sale and to execute any agreements necessary to implement projects funded through these appropriations.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of this item will provide $199,660.00 for air service development efforts and delegate authority to appropriate the remaining $64,168.50 from the land sale for airport operational and compliance needs.

Alternative Action
City Council may decline to appropriate land sale revenues and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding (City) Airports Division sold property at 6550 Lockheed Drive for $263,828.50 generating unbudgeted revenue for the Airports Division. Proceeds from the sale will enable the Airports Division to proceed with efforts in air service development which is expected to increase the competitivity of the Redding Regional Airport (RDD) in attracting new air service. History has shown that when air service thrives, additional revenue in the form of car rental and car parking concessions, correspondingly increase. These additional funds will allow the Airports Division to carry out various operational and air service development strategies.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)--
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a) - Budget Amendment - Airport
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 193
Report to Redding City Council November 1, 2023
Re: 4.2(a)--Budget Amendment - Airport Page 2
The Airports Division seeks to utilize funds from the land sale proceeds as follows:
• $94,660 – The Airports Division has been utilizing Mead & Hunt as the air service development/marketing consultant. These proceeds would be used to continue these consulting services;
• $105,000 – The Airports Division is requesting funding to purchase a boarding ramp that would support air service development. Procuring right-sized and ready-for-use ground equipment is an important tool to market RDD to various air carriers interested in operating out of RDD. This equipment would accommodate new types of jet aircraft making the City a more competitive market for air service; and • $64,000 – These funds would be used to support a variety of compliance, operational, security, and safety needs at RDD and Benton Field.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act or the National Environmental Policy Act. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 194
Resolution No. 2023 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 16 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $199,660 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A BOARDING RAMP AND AN AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
201 7101 Redding Regional Airport $199,660
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
211-7101-3741007-00000 Sale of Property $ 199,660
Increase Expenditures
201-7101-7500002-00000 Equipment - Equipment $ 105,000
201-7101-5037550-00000 Air Service Development $ 94,660 Total $ 199,660 $ 199,660
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $199,660 for the purchase of a boarding ramp and an air service development contract for fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the ______day of __________, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.2(a)--Budget Amendment - Airport)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following actions related to the Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program to assist with the South City Park Redevelopment Project:
(1) Adopt Resolution accepting a Section 108 Program Loan, pledging the City of Redding’s general fund ($240,000) as security, and authorizing the City Manager to execute a United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 108 Contract, Note, and related documents containing that pledge;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving the 19th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023- 060 appropriating $2,698,000 for the revised Section 108 Program funding of the South City Park Project and establishing a Section 108 payment guarantee for Fiscal year 2023- 24;
(3) Find that applying for and accepting grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(4) Find that applying for and accepting grant funding is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act under Title 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Fiscal Impact
The proposed amount of funds to be borrowed from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program (Section 108) is $2,458,000 for the South City Park Project (Project). It is proposed that the funds will be drawn down in five installments. Each installment is charged a two percent processing fee plus $70. The amount of interest charged on the overall balance of the funds is based on the Three-month Treasury Bill Rate plus 35 basis points or presently, about 5.675 percent. Repayment is based on a 20-year loan term. Each year, interest only payments will be paid quarterly with a principal payment due in August of each year. Based on the most recent calculation by the Finance Department, the highest annual payment, taking into consideration both interest and principal is approximately $240,000.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.2(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(c)-Consider adopting Resolution for the Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Guaranteed Loan.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 196
Report to Redding City Council November 2, 2023
Re: 4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Page 2 The City of Redding (City) is also required to provide collateral for the loan. It is requested that the City set-aside General Fund dollars as security for the loan. This “Pledge” must be placed into the City’s budget year-after-year, for the 20-year loan term, as a line item. The risk to the City’s General Fund is low as the City has been an entitlement jurisdiction, receiving annual CDBG funding allocations, for more than 40 years.

Each year the CDBG Section 108 payment will be included in the Annual Action Plan as a project. Payment of the Section 108 Loan will decrease the amount of CDBG funds available to other infrastructure projects by the amount of the annual payment.

The Section 108 draws will be done on a reimbursement basis. The initial draw should be received within 45 days of request and subsequent draws should be received in seven days.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the terms of the CDBG Section 108. Not accepting the proposed terms will jeopardize the ability of the City to complete the South City Park Renovation Project’s current scope. Either the scope of the Project would need to be substantially reduced, or the Project may not proceed altogether, depending on other grant funding earmarked for the Project.

Background/Analysis
In September 2019, as part of the Block 7 North Block Development Agreement approval, staff was authorized to apply for a Section 108 loan in the amount of $3,500,000. In August 2022, the Council approved the Section 108 financing terms and conditions and adopted Resolution No. 2022-085, authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents or contracts to obtain the loan. However, in November 2022, the CDBG Section 108 loan funds via Resolution No. 2022-115 were re-appropriated to the Project.

In September 2023, the City’s Housing Division submitted a revised Section 108 application in the amount of $2,458,000 to fund the Project. As part of the Section 108 loan process, a resolution must be considered by Council. If the Section 108 Loan and noted terms are approved by Council, staff will send the Resolution and related documents to HUD. HUD will review the documents and confirm the funding commitment and interest rate calculations. Once approved, HUD will forward the Section 108 Loan agreement and associated documents back to the City for City Manager signature.

Environmental Review
Applying for and accepting funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), administrative and management activities such as applying for and accepting funding are considered exempt activities.

Site specific environmental studies are in progress for South City Park Redevelopment Project, and CEQA/NEPA determinations will be made prior to executing any construction contracts.

Packet Pg. 197
Report to Redding City Council November 2, 2023
Re: 4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Page 3 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development- “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Resolution - Section 108
^Resolution - Budget
Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Block Development
Previous Staff Report November 1, 2022 item no. 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects
Packet Pg. 198
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING ACCEPTING A SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN UNDER SECTION
108 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF
1974, AS AMENDED, PLEDGING THE CITY OF REDDING’S GENERAL

FUND AS SECURITY, AND AUTHORIZING BARRY TIPPIN, CITY
MANAGER, TO EXECUTE A HUD SECTION 108 LOAN GUARANTEE

CONTRACT, NOTE, AND RELATED DOCUMENTS CONTAINING

THAT PLEDGE
WHEREAS, The City of Redding City Council, by Resolution No. 2022-085 authorized the City Manager to execute all necessary documents or contracts as might be required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) as support of a loan in the amount of an application for a $3,737,000 Section 108 Loan Guarantee for Block 7 Infrastructure Project and Downtown Facade Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Block 7 Infrastructure project used American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds instead of Section 108 Loan Guarantee funds as previously contemplated under Resolution No. 2022-085; and the South City Park Renovation project will now use the Section 108 Loan Guarantee proceeds, with an adjusted amount of $2,458,000, for the South City Park Renovation project; and
WHEREAS, said resolution is hereby incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, California Government Code sections 37103 and 53060 authorize cities to enter into agreements, including loan agreements, with the United States or any agency or department thereof for any lawful public purpose; and
WHEREAS, City of Redding has successfully obtained a commitment in the amount of $2,458,000 from HUD for the Loan Guarantee; and
WHEREAS, HUD’s guarantee of the Note will be governed by a Contract for Loan Guarantee Assistance under Section 108 between the City and HUD (the “Contract”), in which this Resolution is incorporated herein by reference, and in which the City pledges Community Development Block Grants pursuant to 24 CFR 570.705(b)(2) and City of Redding’ General Fund for the repayment thereof:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute any and all documents necessary to accept the loan guarantee referenced above and any subsequent notes.

Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: ^Resolution - Section 108 (4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan) Section 2. The Note constitutes a general indebtedness of the City and is payable from any money as is lawfully available and authorized or pledged by the City for the payment of principal of and interest on the Note, including but not limited to CDBG block grant funds pledged by the Borrower pursuant to 24 CFR 570.705(b)(2). For as long as the Note is outstanding, the City irrevocably pledges that it shall, in the manner provided by law within the constitutional and statutory limitations provided by law without the assent of the voters, make the prompt payment of principal and interest on the Note as the same shall become due. The obligation of the City as Borrower to make payments under the Contract shall be payable first from CDBG block grant funds pledged by the Borrower pursuant to 24 CFR 570.705(b)(2).

Section 3. The City Council hereby irrevocably pledges CDBG block grant funds pledged by the Borrower pursuant to 24 CFR 570.705(b)(2) and the General Fund in support of all obligations of the City as Borrower under any notes executed by the City, up to the amount of HUD’s commitment for Section 108 Loan Guarantee Assistance, evidencing the Section 108 guaranteed loan for the City’s South City Park Redevelopment Plan pursuant to paragraph 15 of the related Contract for Section 108 Loan Guarantee Assistance between the City and HUD. This pledge shall be enforceable in mandamus against the City.

Section 4. The provisions of this resolution are declared to be separate and severable. If a court of competent jurisdiction, all appeals having been exhausted or all appeal periods having run, finds any provision of this resolution to be invalid or unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, such offending provision shall, if feasible, be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity. However, if the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be null and void with respect to the particular person or circumstance, and all other provisions of this resolution in all other respects, and the offending provision with respect to all other persons and all other circumstances, shall remain valid and enforceable.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of November, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
___________________________________
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: ^Resolution - Section 108 (4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 19 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $2,698,000 FOR THE REVISED SECTION 108 FUNDING OF THE SOUTH CITY PARK PROJECT AND ESTABLISHNG A SECTION 108 PAYMENT GUARANTEE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
191
101
9161
1091
Community Development Block
Grant
General Fund Debt Service
$2,458,000
$240,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
191-9161-3742001-00000 Loan Proceeds $ 2,458,000
101-1091-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 240,000
Increase Expenditures
191-9161-6001304-00000 South City Park-Sec. 108 $ 2,407,730 191-9161-5087502-00000 Loan Fees $ 50,270
101-1091-9000901-00000 Section 108 loan guarantee $ 240,000 THAT the purpose is to appropriate $2,698,000 for the revised Section 108 Funding of the South City Park Project and establishing a section 108 payment guarantee for fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7
th day of November, 2023, and was duly adopted at said
meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: ^Resolution - Budget (4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan) Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: ^Resolution - Budget (4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and/or authorize the following actions:
(1) Approve the Second Amendment to the North Block Development Agreement (C-8238) (Second Amendment) with Block 7 Retail Investors, LLC, for the development of the Downtown Park Plaza (Plaza Project); and authorize the Mayor to execute the Second Amendment;
(2) Approve the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement with Block 7 Retail Investors, LLC, for the construction of a Downtown Park Plaza; and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement;
(3) Authorize the following actions related to the award of the California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) Clean California Local Grant (CCLG) Program:
a. Accept the award and adopt Resolution for CCLG Program funds in the amount of $3,889,480;
b. Authorize the City Manager to execute the CCLG Program Restricted Grant Agreement, any amendments and the associated documentation; c. Direct the City Manager and the Finance Director to set forth the terms, conditions and administrative measures to utilize the General Fund as temporary funding prior to the disbursement of CCLG Program grant funds, in an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000;
d. Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 47th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating the CCLG Program funds; (4) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 51st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $575,000 of Redding Electric Utility’s Replacing and Upgrading Underground Conductors and Devices funding; and (5) Authorize the following actions related to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Section 108 Loan Guarantee (Section 108) Program:
a. Approve the financing terms and conditions;
MEETING DATE: August 2, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.2(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Block Development in Downtown Redding.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Report to Redding City Council July 27, 2022
Re: 9.2(c)--Approve Agreements & Authorize Resolutions for North Block Development Page 2 b. Adopt Resolution approving the CDBG application in the amount of $3,737,000; and
c. Authorize the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to complete the Section 108 Program loan process and appropriate funds upon approval of the loan.

Fiscal Impact
In March 2022, the City of Redding (City) and The McConnell Foundation were awarded $3,889,480 from the Caltrans CCLG Program. These funds, combined with the City’s Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee reimbursements, will finance the design and development of the Plaza Project. To facilitate the CCLG Program funds, Housing Division staff would utilize General Fund cash for a 45- to 60-day period, as Caltrans processes the CCLG Program reimbursement to the City. As proposed, the City Manager and the Finance Director would set forth the borrowing limits, not to exceed $1,000,000, and the associated terms and conditions.

Future maintenance of the Plaza Project is anticipated to be funded through the potential downtown property-based improvement district or a landscape maintenance district as provided within the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement. The final maintenance funding mechanism will be brought to the City Council at a future meeting.

Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Replacing and Upgrading Underground Conductors and Devices (RUUCD) funding is derived from REU’s capital improvement budget and is earmarked for the development of infrastructure within the City and is anticipated to assist Block 7 infrastructure costs in the amount of $575,000. Allocation of these funds to the Block 7 Development will not impact the General Fund.

The Section 108 Program Loan payment is estimated to be $186,850 per year for a 20-year term.

Each year, the payment will be considered a project and included in the CDBG Annual Action Plan. Payment of the Section 108 Loan will decrease the amount of CDBG funds available to other public infrastructure projects. As proposed for collateral, the City would pledge General Fund revenues as security for the loan; however, this risk is low, as the City has been an entitlement jurisdiction receiving annual CDBG funding allocations for more than 40 years; in this period of time, federal administrations have threatened to discontinue the CDBG program, but it has never come to fruition.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could reject or seek modifications to the Second Amendment language; choose not to accept the Caltrans CCLG Program funds; not amend the City’s budget for the appropriation of CCLG or REU funds to the Project; nor approve the Section 108 Program Loan. Any of these actions could put the Block 7 North Block or Plaza Project in jeopardy of completion.

Background/Analysis
In September 2019, the Council approved the North Block Parking Project that included authorization for the City Manager to negotiate a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding with the Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District (District) and the City for the transfer of a portion of property located at 1400 Market Street. Subsequently, in June 2022, Council approved a Park Dedication and Easement Agreement that deeds the property to the City Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Report to Redding City Council July 27, 2022
Re: 9.2(c)--Approve Agreements & Authorize Resolutions for North Block Development Page 3 for purposes of developing a public park. The property transaction is currently in escrow and will be completed by mid-August 2022. The Plaza Project site is detailed in Exhibit B of the Second Amendment to the North Block Development Agreement (North Block DA).

To facilitate the development of the Plaza Project, staff is seeking approval of the Second Amendment to the North Block DA, the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement and accepting the award of CCLG Program funds which are detailed further in Sections I and II below.

I. North Block DA Amendment
Pursuant to the Second Amendment to the North Block DA, the scope of work is modified to include the construction of the Plaza Project that will be developed by the Block 7 Retail Investors, LLC. The expanded scope includes architectural design services, permits, improvements and development administration for the Plaza Project. In exchange for the expanded scope of work, the Block 7 Retail Investors, LLC, after showing proof of payment for eligible park development related expenses, will receive credit for its associated Block 7 park impact fee obligations as further defined in the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement.

The estimated total cost of the Plaza Project is $4,725,935. The Plaza Project improvements will be funded by the CCLG Program funds and Park and Recreation Facilities impact fees. In March 2022, the City and The McConnell Foundation were awarded $3,889,480 from the CCLG Program. The CCLG Program is a competitive program created to beautify and clean up local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces. In order to utilize the CCLG Program funds, the Council must formally accept the CCLG Program grant, and approve a resolution amending the City’s budget to accommodate the additional Plaza Project funds. The grant agreement and approving resolution are attached.

II. Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement The Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement provides up to seven hundred and eighty thousand dollars ($780,000) in reimbursement for eligible park development expenses, the estimated amount of park fees paid by the Block 7 and Market Center projects.

The agreement requires City approvals for final design, award of the construction contract and construction inspection. The Community Services Advisory Commission has reviewed the proposal and supports the project and the funding agreement.

III. Block 7 Project Infrastructure

REU RUUCD
The North Block DA provided the typical scope of work for the development, construction, and management of the parking project and the Commercial, Retail, and Market-Rate Housing Project. With similar types of projects, Redding Electric Utility (REU) will have a developer perform work that REU would traditionally complete in order to maintain continuity of the infrastructure. REU will then reimburse these costs to the developer, including REU’s proportional share of overhead costs. After assessing the value of these costs, REU’s portion of development for the Block 7 North Block, Mid-Block and South Block, amount to a calculated reimbursement due to the developer of $575,000. In support of this process, a budget resolution Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Report to Redding City Council July 27, 2022
Re: 9.2(c)--Approve Agreements & Authorize Resolutions for North Block Development Page 4 must be executed to infuse the REU RUUCD funds into the City’s budget to reimburse the developer for its REU-related expenditures for the Block 7 infrastructure projects.

Section 108
In September 2019, as part of the North Block DA approval, staff was authorized to apply for a Section 108 Program Loan in the amount of $3,500,000. The Section 108 Program provides CDBG recipients with the ability to leverage their annual grant allocation to access low-cost flexible financing for economic development, housing, public facility, and infrastructure projects. The Section 108 Program Loan funds are borrowed by the City and repaid by the City through pledging current or future CDBG allocations over a 20-year term.

In early 2022, the Section 108 Loan Application was submitted to HUD and underwent an initial underwriting review. As proposed in the Section 108 Loan Application, $2,800,000 would be utilized to fund Block 7 infrastructure costs associated with California Street, California Alleyway, and both Butte and Yuba Streets. The remaining $700,000 would be allocated toward a Façade Program to assist Downtown businesses with façade improvements. The Façade Program policy will be brought back to Council for consideration following HUDs approval of the Section 108 Loan.

Through HUDs review process, it was determined that the utilization of future CDBG allocations to repay the loan was acceptable but HUD also recommended utilizing General Fund revenue as additional collateral for the loan. The pledging of these funds is not an obligation that would require any set aside into a separate account. HUD only wishes to be assured that there is sufficient revenue held by the City to cover CDBG Section 108 loan payments should the CDBG revenue stream cease to exist. The value of General Fund collateral would equal the value of loan payments for one year with a replenishment provision (or $186,850). HUD is the guarantor of the loan.

The total Section 108 Loan amount, including loan costs, is estimated to be $3,737,000 with an estimated annual principal payment $186,850 for a 20-year term. Interim borrowed funds will require quarterly interest payments. The interim interest rate is calculated based on the Treasury’s three-month auction rate plus 35 basis points or, presently, an estimated 2.91 percent.

Once the loan is converted to permanent financing, the rate would be based on the 10-year Treasury rate plus 55 basis points. Each time funds are drawn from the line of credit, there is a two-percent fee plus a $70 charge per transaction.

As part of the Section 108 Loan application process, the Council must review and approve the amended application and the associated Resolution. If the Section 108 Loan is approved by Council, staff will send both the updated Section 108 Loan Application (July 2022 version) and Resolution to HUD. HUD will review the documents, send them to its loan committee to confirm the funding commitment and interest rate calculations. Once approved, HUD will forward the Section 108 Loan Agreement back to the City for City Manager signature.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Report to Redding City Council July 27, 2022
Re: 9.2(c)--Approve Agreements & Authorize Resolutions for North Block Development Page 5 Attachments
^Resolution - CCLG program funds
^Resolution - Clean California Grant Program
^Resolution - REU Fund Appropriation
^Resolution - CDBG Section 108
108 Application July 2022
Clean California Local Grant Program (State) Agreement
Second Amendment to Block 7 North Block Development Agreement Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement Previous Staff Report - June 7, 2022, item no. 4.2(b)-Shasta College Park Dedication and Easement (Downtown)
Previous Staff Report- September 30, 2019, item no. 9.4(c)-Block 7 and North Block DA Parking and Affordable Housing
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c)--Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to grant funding for the South City Park and Block 7 Project infrastructure projects:
(1) Authorize the following actions related to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program (Section 108 Program):
a. Adopt Resolution approving the CDBG Section 108 Program application in the amount of $3,737,000;
b. Authorize the City Manager to re-appropriate funding upon approval of CDBG Section 108 Program application for design and improvements at South City Park; c. Authorize the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to modify the Section 108 Program application and facilitate the funding changes; and (2) Authorize the following actions related to the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding:
a. Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 70th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 decreasing existing allocations for South City Park by $2,407,730 and appropriating $2,407,730 in ARPA funding to Block 7 project infrastructure; and
b. Authorize the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to facilitate the funding changes.

Fiscal Impact
Should the City Council (Council) approve this item, it will switch funding sources between the Block 7 and South City Park Projects. As these are two grant-funded projects, there is no impact to the General Fund.

MEETING DATE: November 1, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.6(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Previous Staff Report November 1, 2022 item no. 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects Report to Redding City Council October 26, 2022
Re: 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects Page 2 Alternative Action
The Council could decline to reallocate or switch funding sources for the Block 7 and South City Park projects. This action will limit opportunities for staff to obtain supplemental grant funding for South City Park.

Background/Analysis
South City Park, Redding’s oldest park, is nearly 100 years old and is uniquely poised to serve the community. It has, within its boundaries, a baseball field, bocce ball courts, tennis courts, a basketball court, walkways, and open grassy areas for picnicking, sitting, and other informal uses. In recent years, community utilization decreased in the park and South City Park needed revitalization to return to its original vibrancy.

On November 16, 2021, staff presented a proposal to the Council, recommended by the Community Services Advisory Commission (CSAC), to conduct a broad community engagement effort regarding the future of South City Park. Following the community engagement, on March 15, 2022, the Council opted to allocate Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds, also known as SLFRF and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), toward the revitalization efforts of South City Park. Staff retained the services of Project for Public Spaces (PPS), a multi-disciplinary firm that has facilitated many public placemaking community engagement efforts, published multiple studies and reports on the subject, and assisted communities in reactivating neglected public spaces.

At the June 16, 2022, meeting, the Council approved a concept to reimagine South City Park and authorized staff to refine the concept, develop a program, and estimate project costs with PPS.

Construction costs will exceed the $2.5 million ARPA allocation. Staff discovered, while investigating other grant funding opportunities to address the funding gap, that some available grant programs do not accept ARPA funds as a match funding source. CDBG funding, however, is an eligible source of match for most federal programs. By reallocating previously authorized CDBG Section 108 Program funds for South City Park, rather than ARPA funding, staff may seek out and apply for grant opportunities to fully fund the South City Park improvements.

The CDBG Section 108 Program provides communities with a source of financing for economic development, housing rehabilitation, and public facilities. The Section 108 Program loan funds are borrowed and subsequently repaid by the City through its current and future CDBG allocations over a 20-year term. The current loan application specified infrastructure improvements on the Block 7 project. Necessary Block 7 project improvements include water, wastewater, storm drains, and underground utility infrastructure to support income-eligible housing, all of which are approved uses for ARPA funding. Staff proposes to move the Block 7 improvements to the ARPA program and the South City Park improvements to the CDBG Section 108 Program. The change in allocations will unlock more funding opportunities for South City Park. Staff will return to the Council to obtain authority to apply for grants as needed.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. Environmental studies are in progress for South City Park, and a CEQA/NEPA determination will be made prior to construction.

Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Previous Staff Report November 1, 2022 item no. 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects Report to Redding City Council October 26, 2022
Re: 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects Page 3 For Block 7, on November 10, 2017, after the Planning Commission held a public hearing, it approved Use Permit UP-2017-01322, and a CEQA Notice of Exemption was filed on November 22, 2017. The NEPA Authority to Use Grant Funding document was executed by the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development on August 19, 2019.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^Resolution - Budget
Sep 26_2019_Staff Report
Mar 15_2022_9.10(b) Staff Report
June 16_2022_9.6(a) Staff Report
Aug 2_2022_Resolution
Aug 2_2022_Staff report
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Previous Staff Report November 1, 2022 item no. 4.6(c)--Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Rural and Municipal Utility Cybersecurity (RMUC) Advanced Cybersecurity Technology (ACT) 1 Prize Program:
(1) Authorize the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to submit a commitment to competing in the RMUC ACT 1 Prize Program; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to appropriate the RMUC ACT 1 Prize Program funding, if awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding (City) has the potential of receiving up to $200,000 and up to 120 hours of third-party cybersecurity services by entering into the ACT 1 Prize Program. If awarded funding, the award will be in the form of a cash prize that will not result in a grant or cooperative agreement.

If awarded funding, a letter of support from the Redding Electric Utility’s Director is required and the letter should recognize that successfully competing in the RMUC ACT 1 Prize Program will require an ongoing commitment of staff time and resources, and the director is supportive of the use of staff time and resources for this purpose.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not authorize the City to participate in the ACT 1 Prize Program.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.3(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected] SUBJECT: 4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program Tony Van Boekel, Chief
Information Officer/IT
Director
Packet Pg. 211
Report to Redding City Council November 1, 2023
Re: 4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program Page 2 Background/Analysis
The RMUC ACT 1 Prize Program is an American-Made Challenges competition administered by the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory and managed by DOE’s Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response.

Established by the historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the RMUC program will provide $250 million over a five-year period to enhance the cybersecurity posture of electric cooperative, municipal, and small investor-owned utilities. The ACT 1 Prize Program is the first in the RMUC’s ACT 1 Prize series.

The RMUC Program will support critical investments to strengthen utility systems, deliver technical assistance, and provide cybersecurity training to the utility workforce. These investments will result in a more secure and resilient energy grid that is better prepared to meet the challenging cybersecurity threats facing electric utilities. See more at https://www.herox.com/ACT1Prize.

The Program includes three phases; phases two and three requiring an award from the previous phase. The first phase, Commitment, awards up to 50 winners $50,000 and 60 hours of technical assistance. The second phase, Planning, awards up to 25 winners $50,000 and 60 hours of technical assistance. The third phase, Implementation, awards up to 25 winners $100,000.

If the City is selected to receive any funding, the Chief Information Officer and Cyber Security Officer will work with the City Manager to determine the best use of funds; additionally, the Information Technology Department will track the use of these funds.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules
Packet Pg. 212
Rural and Municipal Utility Cybersecurity (RMUC)
Advanced Cybersecurity Technology (ACT) 1 Prize
A U G U S T 2 0 2 3
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Preface
The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Advanced Cybersecurity Technology (ACT) 1 Prize will be governed by 15 U.S.C. §3719 and this Official Rules document. This is not a procurement under the Federal Acquisitions Regulations and will not result in a grant or cooperative agreement under 2 CFR 200. The Prize Administrator reserves the right to modify this Official Rules document if necessary and will publicly post any such notifications as well as notify registered prize participants.

Date Modification
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Contents
Preface ................................................................................................................................ 2 Contents .............................................................................................................................. 3 Program Summary ............................................................................................................... 5 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 5 Key Dates ................................................................................................................................................. 7 ACT 1 Prize Program Goals...................................................................................................................... 7 Overview of Prize Submission, Assessment, and Announcement Process ......................................... 9 Eligibility.................................................................................................................................................... 9 General Eligibility Requirements ........................................................................................................... 9 Specific Eligibility Requirements for Each Phase................................................................................ 10 Changes in Eligibility Determined by DOE........................................................................................... 11 1 Commitment Phase ......................................................................................................... 12

1.1 Goal..................................................................................................................................................12

1.2 Prize Amounts and Important Dates..............................................................................................12

1.3 What to Submit for the Commitment Prize....................................................................................12

1.3.1 Cover Page and Narrative.......................................................................................................... 13

1.3.2 Letter of Support ....................................................................................................................... 15

1.3.3 Utility Profile Form ..................................................................................................................... 16

1.3.4 RMUC Utility Service Territory Report ........................................................................................ 16

1.3.5 TA Request Form ....................................................................................................................... 17

1.3.6 Mandatory ACT 1 Virtual Prize Workshops Confirmation........................................................... 17

1.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged............................................................................................18 2 Planning Phase ............................................................................................................... 21

2.1 Goal..................................................................................................................................................21

2.2 Prize Amounts and Important Dates..............................................................................................22

2.3 What to Submit for Planning Prize .................................................................................................22

2.3.1 Cover Page and Narrative.......................................................................................................... 22

2.3.2 Estimated Roadmap Budget and Letters of Support ................................................................ 24

2.3.3 Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan Confirmation................................................................. 25

2.3.4 TA Provider Review Form...................................................................................................... 25

2.3.5 TA Request Form ....................................................................................................................... 26

2.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged............................................................................................26 3 Implementation Phase .................................................................................................... 30

3.1 Goal..................................................................................................................................................30

3.2 Prize Amounts and Important Dates..............................................................................................30

3.3 What to Submit for the Implementation Prize...............................................................................30

3.3.1 Cover Page and Narrative .................................................................................................... 31

3.3.2 Roadmap Budget and Letters of Support ............................................................................ 32

3.3.3 Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan....................................................................................... 33

3.3.4 TA Provider Review Form...................................................................................................... 34 Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

3.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged............................................................................................34 4 How We Determine Winners ............................................................................................ 37

4.1 How the Final Score for a Submission Package is Calculated.....................................................37

4.2 Program Policy Factors ...................................................................................................................37

4.3 Final Determination ........................................................................................................................38

4.4 Announcement of Winners .............................................................................................................38 Additional Requirements.......................................................................................................................38 5 RMUC Program Background ............................................................................................ 39 Appendix 1: Additional Terms and Conditions ..................................................................... 40 A.1 Requirements ..................................................................................................................................40 A.2 Verification for Payments................................................................................................................40 A.3 Teams and Single-Entity Awards ....................................................................................................41 A.4 Submission Rights...........................................................................................................................41 A.5 Copyright ..........................................................................................................................................42 A.6 Contest Subject to Applicable Law.................................................................................................42 A.7 Resolution of Disputes....................................................................................................................42 A.8 Publicity............................................................................................................................................42 A.9 Liability .............................................................................................................................................43 A.10 Records Retention and Freedom of Information Act..................................................................43 A.11 Privacy............................................................................................................................................44 A.12 General Conditions .......................................................................................................................44 A.13 National Environmental Policy Act Compliance ..........................................................................44 A.14 Return of Funds.............................................................................................................................45

Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Program Summary
Introduction
The goal of the Advanced Cybersecurity Technology1 (ACT) 1 Prize Program is to improve the ability of eligible utilities to protect against, detect, respond to, and recover from cybersecurity threats. The ACT 1 Prize Program is supported by the Rural and Municipal Utility Cybersecurity (RMUC) Program led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response.

The ACT 1 Prize Program will award $7.25 million in cash prizes and up to $1.71 million in technical assistance (TA) for a total of to $8.96 million in prizes.

ACT 1 cash prizes will be available to eligible utilities to incentivize meaningful, impactful investments in cybersecurity technologies and support training to increase the knowledge, skills, and abilities of utility staff. Successful competitors to this prize competition will propose and complete work
implementing solutions that address cybersecurity risks. In partnership with qualified cybersecurity TA providers, ACT 1 prize winners will:
• Develop network architectures of their digital systems to identify and prioritize where interventions might be most effective
• Assess current cybersecurity technical stacks for gaps, duplication of functions, and opportunities to fully utilize existing capabilities
• Create cybersecurity plans and roadmaps to improve their cybersecurity posture • Identify solutions that can be operated and maintained by existing staff and budgets • Develop budgets, cost projections, and purchasing plans to minimize third-party risks when selecting solutions
• Implement solutions
• Develop and implement processes to ensure solutions are installed securely and perform as intended.

The ACT 1 Prize Program will prioritize utilities eligible to participate in the RMUC Program that have limited cybersecurity resources or serve military installations. Utilities are strongly encouraged to apply if they: (1) have limited economic and staff resources; (2) have limited access to cybersecurity training, TA, and support services; and (3) have a low cybersecurity maturity level. Utilities that serve military installations are also strongly encouraged to apply. The Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response intends to offer a series of ACT Prize competitions to further support additional utilities with limited cybersecurity resources and utilities serving military installations. 1 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) §40124 (Public Law 117-58) defines the term “advanced cybersecurity technology” as any technology, operational capability, or service, including computer hardware, software, or a related asset, that enhances the security posture of electric utilities through improvements in the ability to protect against, detect, respond to, or recover from a cybersecurity threat (as defined in Section 102 of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1501)).

What is a prize competition? A prize
competition incentivizes competitors,
typically via cash awards, to achieve
objectives set by the sponsoring
agency. Funding is provided to
winners for work that has already
been performed. Once a prize is
awarded, winners determine how best
to use the funds, with no further
commitments.

Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Utilities with mature cybersecurity programs are unlikely to win prizes under this competition unless they own or operate electric infrastructure that serves military installations. The Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response intends to issue a competitive funding opportunity announcement that will support eligible RMUC Program utilities with more mature cybersecurity programs and not-forprofit entities in partnership with eligible utilities.

The ACT 1 Prize Program has three consecutive phases:

Phase 1. Commitment: utilities describe their resources, need for improving their cybersecurity posture, and commitment to participating in the ACT 1 Prize Program.

Phase 2. Planning: utilities work with TA providers to: complete technical assessments of their systems; identify areas where training would improve staff skills and abilities; gain a better understanding of potential risks and solutions; identify solutions to address prioritized risks; and draft a roadmap for implementation.

Phase 3. Implementation: utilities make substantial progress toward completing their roadmap.

Winners in the first phase, the Commitment Phase, will receive a cash prize of $50,000 and up to either 60 or 120 hours of TA. Table 1 shows all three phases, the maximum number of prize winners, and the maximum cash and TA prizes for each phase. The ACT 1 Prize Program has two tracks, LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES and MILITARY. The goals and cash prizes for the two tracks are the same.

The difference between the two tracks is utilities serving military installations in the MILTARY track are eligible to receive additional specialized TA.

Each phase has a separate application process and different deadlines. All instructions for the first phase, Commitment, are contained within the first 20 pages of this document and the Appendix. If you decide to compete for a Planning Prize (Phase 2) and an Implementation Prize (Phase 3), see Sections 2 (Planning Phase) and 3 (Implementation Phase) for application instructions and deadlines.

Table 1. RMUC Program ACT 1 Prize Cash and TA
Phase

LIMITED CYBERSECURITY
RESOURCES Track
MILITARY Track
Commitment
• $50,000
• Up to 60 hours of TA
• Up to 50 winners.
• $50,000
• Up to 120 hours of TA
• Up to 5 winners.

Planning
• $50,000
• Up to 60 hours of TA
• Up to 25 winners.
• $50,000
• Up to 120 hours of TA
• Up to 5 winners.

Implementation
• $100,000
• Up to 25 winners.
• $100,000
• Up to 5 winners.

Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Key Dates
Phase Dates and Milestones
Phase 1:

Commitment
• Submission Opens: August 30, 2023
• Submission Closes: 5 p.m. ET on November 29, 2023
• Winners Announced and Awards: March 2024 (anticipated).

Phase 2:

Planning
• Submission Opens: March 2024 (anticipated)
• Submission Closes: August 2024 (anticipated)
• Winners Announced and Awards: October 2024 (anticipated).

Phase 3:

Implementation
• Submission Opens: October 2024 (anticipated)
• Submission Closes: January 2025 (anticipated)
• Winners Announced and Awards: March 2025 (anticipated).

ACT 1 Prize Program Goals
The ACT 1 Prize Program offers a total prize pool of up to $7.25 million in cash and up to $1.71 million in TA across three phases—Commitment, Planning, and Implementation—where each phase concludes with a prize award.

Successful utilities in the ACT 1 Prize Program competition will identify cybersecurity risks, identify solutions that reduce or eliminate those risks, and implement selected solutions. Work completed by these utilities should accomplish one or more of the following goals:

A) Increase a utility’s ability to identify cybersecurity threats within their information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) systems
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

B) Improve a utility’s ability to protect against cybersecurity threats C) Improve a utility’s ability to detect cybersecurity events and incidents soon after they occur D) Prepare a utility to respond to and mitigate damage from a cybersecurity incident rapidly and effectively
E) Recover from a cybersecurity incident and identify and implement process improvements.

Phase 1: Commitment. Competitors will describe their utility’s need for assistance, the communities they serve, and their commitment to improving their utility’s cybersecurity posture. The 50 limited cybersecurity resource utilities and 5 utilities serving military installations that most successfully describe and demonstrate their cybersecurity needs, capacity to work with TA providers, and leadership commitment to the Program will be selected to win a Commitment Prize. Only utilities that have won a Commitment Prize are eligible to enter the Planning Phase and compete for a Planning Prize.

Phase 2: Planning. Up to 25 utilities in the limited cybersecurity resources track and up to 5 utilities serving military installations will win Planning Prizes. During this phase, utilities will demonstrate that they have a better understanding of their systems and cybersecurity risks, prioritize where system hardening improvements could be made, identify potential solutions, identify relevant cybersecurity training options, and draft a roadmap for implementing technical and training solutions. Competitors will be expected to complete assessments, provide justifications for proposed solutions, and develop estimated budgets for implementation of their roadmaps. In addition, competitors will draft a Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan.
2 Only winners of a Planning Prize will be eligible to compete in the Implementation Phase.

Phase 3: Implementation. Up to 25 utilities from the limited cybersecurity resources track and up to 5 from the military track will win Implementation Prizes. The goal of the Implementation Phase is for utilities to begin implementing the solutions proposed in the Planning Phase. Activities in the Implementation Phase might include but are not limited to: receiving training necessary to install, operate, and maintain the proposed cybersecurity solutions; developing and negotiating contracts; purchasing and installing hardware, software, firmware, and IT and/or OT equipment or components to support cybersecurity goals; purchasing and implementing licenses or subscriptions for a security solution; and developing processes to confirm the security of deployed solutions after implementation. Success in the Implementation Phase will be based on the progress each utility made in implementing their solutions.

Many utilities serving rural America are in areas of the country with limited economic opportunities and financial resources. The RMUC Program, as one of the Justice403 programs, is committed to ensuring that overburdened, underserved, and underrepresented communities have equitable access to federal 2 Section 40126 of the IIJA provides a framework for ensuring that DOE’s investments in energy sector research and infrastructure are secure and resilient from cybersecurity threats and requires all relevant IIJA provisions to have cybersecurity plans. DOE developed three cybersecurity plan templates—one for high-risk projects, one for medium-risk projects, and one for low-risk projects—to streamline the development and review of Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plans.
3 The Justice40 initiative, established by E.O. 14008, establishes the goal that 40% of the overall benefits of certain federal investments should flow to disadvantaged communities. Pursuant to E.O. 14008 and the Office of Management and Budget’s Interim Justice40 Implementation Guidance M-21-28 and M-23-09 (whitehouse.gov), DOE recognizes disadvantaged communities as defined and identified by the White House Council on Environmental Quality’s Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), located at https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/. DOE’s Justice40 Implementation Guidance is located at https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-
07/Final%20DOE%20Justice40%20General%20Guidance%20072522.pdf.

Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

resources and receive benefits from federal investments. Utilities that compete for an ACT 1 Prize must demonstrate a commitment to serving the disadvantaged communities4 in their service territory.

Overview of Prize Submission, Assessment, and
Announcement Process
All utilities interested in competing in the ACT 1 Prize Program will need to create an account using the HeroX website and then submit required materials to that account. Each utility will be responsible for uploading all required materials into HeroX before the deadline associated with each of the ACT 1 Prize phases.

1. Submission: Utilities assemble all required
documents for each phase of the ACT 1 Prize into a
submission package and upload their submission
package to HeroX by the phase deadline.

2. Assessment: The Prize Administrator screens
submissions for eligibility, confirms that all required documents are included in the submission package,
and assigns subject-matter expert reviewers to independently score the content of each submission. See Section 4 How We Determine Winners for additional information.

3. Announcement: After the winners are selected, the Prize Administrator notifies each prize winner and requests the information necessary to distribute the cash prizes and TA.

Eligibility
General Eligibility Requirements
The ACT 1 Prize Program competition is open only to eligible utilities as defined in the RMUC Program’s authorizing legislation.
5 The following entities are eligible to compete in the ACT 1 Prize Program:
• Rural electric cooperatives
• Utilities owned by a political subdivision of a state, such as a municipally owned electric utility • Utilities owned by any agency, authority, corporation, or instrumentality of one or more political subdivisions of a state
• Investor-owned electric utilities that sell less than 4,000,000 megawatt hours of electricity per year.
4 CEJST identifies disadvantaged census tracts across the United States. Under the definition of CEJST, a census tract is considered disadvantaged if it meets one of the following three categories: (1) meets or exceeds the threshold of at least one of the eight categories of burdens; (2) is on land within a federally recognized tribe; or (3) is completely surrounded by disadvantaged communities and is at or above the 50th percentile for low income. CEJST's eight categories of burdens can be found at:
https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/en/methodology#3/33.47/-97.5. 5 IIJA Section 40124 (Public Law 117-58).

HeroX is a web-based platform that is
used to manage the American-Made
Challenge Prizes sponsored by DOE.

Questions about HeroX can be posted
to the Forum tab on the HeroX
platform, and the Prize Administrator
will respond.

Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

If an eligible entity under IIJA Section 40124(a)(3)(E) is owned by a holding company, the eligible entity, and not the holding company, must submit the prize submission package. If the cybersecurity resources of the eligible entity are part of a shared services agreement with a holding company, the holding company may participate in the program; however, the submission package must be submitted by the eligible entity, and funds awarded to the eligible entity may only be for the benefit of the eligible entity and may not be used for the benefit of noneligible subsidiaries of the holding company.

To be successful in competing in the LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES track, a utility must demonstrate that they have limited cybersecurity resources in their submission package.

To be successful in competing in the MILITARY track, a utility must provide service to at least one military installation in its service territory.

If a competitor wishes to be considered for both the LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES and MILITARY tracks, the competitor must indicate on their submission package cover page that they want to be considered for both tracks. Competitors may apply to and be selected for either track at the discretion of the prize judge based on program policy factors, but a utility can only win in one of the two tracks; competitors may not receive prizes from both tracks.

As part of your submission to this prize program, all competitors will be required to sign the following statement:

I am providing this submission package as part of my participation in this prize. I understand that the information contained in this submission will be relied on by the federal government to determine whether to issue a prize to the named competitor. I certify under penalty of perjury that the named competitor meets the eligibility requirements for this prize competition and complies with all other rules contained in the Official Rules document. I further represent that the information contained in the submission is true and contains no misrepresentations. I understand false statements or misrepresentations to the Federal Government may result in civil and/or criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and § 287, and 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 and 3801-3812.

Specific Eligibility Requirements for Each Phase
Phase 1: Commitment: Eligibility
• A single utility may submit only one submission package on behalf of their eligible utility. • The utility’s submission package must be complete.
• Each competitor must attend two mandatory virtual ACT 1 Prize workshops (See Section

1.3.6 for additional information.).

Phase 2: Planning: Eligibility
• Only winners of a Commitment Prize are eligible to compete in the Planning Phase for a Planning Prize.
• A single utility may submit only one submission package on behalf of their eligible utility. • The utility’s submission package must be complete.
• A utility must partner with at least one of the ACT 1 Prize Program TA providers.

Phase 3: Implementation: Eligibility
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

• Only winners of a Planning Prize are eligible to compete in the Implementation Phase for an Implementation Prize.
• A single utility may submit only one submission package on behalf of their eligible utility. • The utility’s submission package must be complete.
• A utility must partner with at least one of the ACT 1 Prize Program TA providers.

Changes in Eligibility Determined by DOE

The following persons and entities are not eligible to compete in the ACT 1 Prize Program. ● DOE employees, employees of sponsoring organizations, members of their immediate families (e.g., spouses, children, siblings, or parents), and persons living in the same household as such persons, whether or not related, are not eligible to participate in this prize contest. ● Individuals who worked at DOE (federal employees or support service contractors) within 6 months prior to the submission deadline of any contest are not eligible to participate in any prize contests in this program.
● Federal entities and federal employees are not eligible to participate in any portion of the prize. ● DOE national laboratory employees cannot compete in the prize. ● Entities and individuals publicly banned from doing business with the U.S. government such as entities and individuals debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participating in federal programs are not eligible to compete. ● Entities and individuals identified as a restricted party on one or more screening lists of the U.S.

Departments of Commerce, State, and the Treasury are not eligible to compete. See Consolidated Screening List.
● Individuals participating in a foreign government talent recruitment program1 sponsored by a country of risk2 and teams that include such individuals are not eligible to compete. ● Entities owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a government of a country of risk are not eligible to compete.
1 A foreign government talent recruitment program is defined as an effort directly or indirectly organized, managed, or funded by a foreign government to recruit science and technology professionals or students (regardless of citizenship or national origin, and whether having a full-time or part-time position). Some foreign government-sponsored talent recruitment programs operate with the intent to import or otherwise acquire from abroad, sometimes through illicit means, proprietary technology or software, unpublished data and methods, and intellectual property to further the military modernization goals and/or economic goals of a foreign government. Many, but not all, programs aim to incentivize the targeted individual to physically relocate to the foreign state for the above purpose. Some programs allow for or encourage continued employment at U.S. research facilities or receipt of federal research funds while concurrently working at and/or receiving compensation from a foreign institution, and some direct participants not to disclose their participation to U.S. entities. Compensation could take many forms, including cash, research funding, complimentary foreign travel, honorific titles, career advancement opportunities, promised future compensation, or other types of remuneration or consideration, including in-kind compensation.
2 Currently, the list of countries of risk includes Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China.

Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

1 Commitment Phase

1.1 Goal
The goal of the Commitment Phase is to begin identifying the cybersecurity improvements your utility would like to accomplish and gaining your leadership’s commitment to making improvements. In the Commitment Phase, you will describe why your utility should qualify as a limited cybersecurity resources utility if you are competing in the LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES track. Utilities in both tracks must describe the utility’s current cybersecurity maturity level and demonstrate in your submission package that your utility and its staff have the capacity to work with TA providers. Utilities will need to provide a letter of support from their authorizing official (CEO, general manager, or governing board) supporting staff resources and time to this effort and affirming the utility’s commitment to fully participate. The RMUC Program recognizes the economic challenges many rural communities face, and competitors will also be asked to describe their utility service territory, the communities they serve, and the work they do to support disadvantaged communities in their service territory.

Submission packages for the Commitment Prize will be evaluated based on the following criteria (See Section 1.4 for more information):
• Criterion 1: Utility Need and Cybersecurity Maturity Level • Criterion 2: Initial Goals, Expected Outcomes, and Impacts on Utility • Criterion 3: Commitment to Implement Cybersecurity Improvements and Capacity to Utilize TA • Criterion 4: Description of Service Territory and Community Benefits.

Priority will be given to utilities that have limited cybersecurity resources and cybersecurity capabilities, have a commitment and capacity to work with TA providers, have strong leadership support, and/or serve a high proportion of low-income and disadvantaged communities.

1.2 Prize Amounts and Important Dates
Up to 50 winners in the LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES track will each receive a cash prize of $50,000 and will be provided with up to 60 hours of TA. Up to 5 winners in the MILITARY track will each receive a cash prize of $50,000 and will be provided with up to 120 hours of TA. • Commitment Phase Opens: Wednesday, August 30, 2023
• Commitment Phase Submission Package Deadline: November 29, 2023 (5 p.m. ET).

1.3 What to Submit for the Commitment Prize
To apply for a Commitment Prize, the utility must:
• Have a staff member attend two required ACT 1 Prize Program workshops • Upload a submission package that includes all the items listed below:

1. Cover page and narrative

2. Letter of support from your organization’s authorizing official (e.g., CEO, general manager, board of directors, etc.)

3. Utility Profile Form (use form provided)
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

4. RMUC Utility Service Territory Report (use Report provided)

5. TA Request Form (use form provided)

6. Mandatory ACT 1 Prize virtual workshops attendance confirmation.

Each of these six items must be uploaded as a PDF and submitted to your utility’s account through the HeroX platform. Each item is described in more detail in the following sections. Your submission will not be considered if it does not include all six items listed above. Recommended templates are available to use for the cover page and narrative, letter of support from your organization’s authorizing official, and mandatory workshops attendance confirmation.

A prize does not require a cost share. However, to effectively utilize the prize funding and 60 hours of TA provided, winning utilities will need leadership support and a commitment of staff time and attention. If your utility decides to compete in the second phase of this prize, the Planning Phase, you will use the TA you won in the Commitment Phase to partner with at least one ACT 1 Prize Program TA provider to review the assessments, conclusions, and proposed solutions completed during the Planning Phase.

1.3.1 Cover Page and Narrative
Cover Page
Your submission package cover page must include the following information:
• Commitment Prize project title
• ACT 1 Prize Track
• Utility name
• City, state, and nine-digit zip code
• Primary point of contact for ACT 1 Commitment Prize submission package (name, title, email, phone number)
• List of names and job titles for all members of your utility’s Commitment Prize team.

In your narrative, you should respond to all the questions under each of the following four topic sections.

There is not a specific word limit for each topic section, but the aggregate response to all four sections must not exceed 3,000 words. A word count must be included at the end of your submission. The word count does not include captions, figures/graphs, or references. You may include up to five supporting images, figures, or graphs. Information contained in hyperlinks to external sources, and any text or graphics beyond the designated limits, will not be reviewed or considered by reviewers or the judge.

The prize reviewers will score your responses to the questions below based on criteria defined in Section

1.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged. It is strongly recommended that you use the narrative template provided, which includes the scoring criteria listed in Section 1.4, and that you understand how the reviewers will judge your responses to the narrative questions to help guide what you write in your narrative.

Do not include specific
cybersecurity vulnerabilities,
risks, or other sensitive
information in any of your
application materials.

Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Commitment Prize Narrative (template available)
Commitment Prize Topic 1: Utility Need and Cybersecurity Maturity Level

1. Describe your utility’s current barriers and challenges to improving its cybersecurity posture.

2. If your utility should be considered in the MILITARY track, briefly describe the military installations in your service territory. If your utility should be considered a LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES utility, explain why.

3. What actions will your utility take to ensure the cybersecurity (confidentiality and integrity) of the information in your submission package?

4. Describe your utility’s cybersecurity maturity and explain why you think this is an accurate assessment. Do not include specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities, risks, or other sensitive information in your response.

If your answer is based on the results of one or more completed cybersecurity assessments (see examples below), provide the names of the assessments and the organization that created the assessments. Do not provide specific results of the assessment(s).

Examples of cybersecurity assessments (assessment name, organization that created the assessment):
• Co-op Cyber Goals, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association • Critical Security Controls, Center for Internet Security • Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals, Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency
• Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model, DOE
• Cybersecurity Framework, National Institute of Standards and Technology • Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, U.S. Department of Defense • Cybersecurity Scorecard, American Public Power Association • Rural Cooperative Cybersecurity Capabilities Program Self-Assessment tool, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association.

Commitment Prize Topic 2: Initial Goals, Expected Outcomes, and Impacts on Utility The purpose of this Prize is to provide financial prizes and TA to enable your utility to invest in technologies, services, and training to improve your utility’s cybersecurity. Do not include specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities, risks, or other sensitive information in your response.

1. Describe the problem(s) or challenge(s) that your utility would address if you received a Commitment Prize.

2. How would you use the prize funding and TA to resolve the problem(s) or challenge(s) you identified?

3. Describe how these actions and changes would improve your utility’s cybersecurity.

Commitment Prize Topic 3: Commitment to Implement Cybersecurity Improvements and Capacity to Utilize TA
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

The work required to compete for a prize in the next phase, the Planning Phase, will require the involvement of technical and nontechnical utility staff. If your utility intends to compete for a Planning Prize, utility staff may spend 5–20 hours in a single week during the Planning Phase either working directly with a TA provider or between meetings with the TA provider. Ideally, your utility will identify an internal Prize Team that consists of more than one employee to work with the TA provider.

1. Who will be the primary point of contact in your utility responsible for working with the TA provider, what is that person’s job title and experience, and what are the expected responsibilities and activities of this person in their role as the point of contact?

2. Describe the responsibilities and activities of other staff members who will be part of your Prize Team, their job titles and experience, and how they will work with the TA provider.

3. Describe any challenges your Prize Team might face in planning and implementing the cybersecurity solution(s) you select and how you will address those challenges.

4. In addition to the letter of support, describe any other actions your utility’s senior leadership has taken to support your Commitment Prize submission package and to ensure appropriate support for continued participation in the ACT 1 Prize Program.

Commitment Prize Topic 4: Description of Service Territory and Community Benefits Many utilities serving rural America are in areas of the country with limited economic opportunities and financial resources. The RMUC Program is committed to ensuring that overburdened, underserved, and underrepresented communities have equitable access to federal resources and receive benefits from federal investments. Every utility will be expected to provide descriptive data about its utility and service territory. Use the links and resources provided on the Utility Profile Template and in your utility’s RMUC Utility Service Territory Report (See Section 1.3.4) to help you answer questions in Topic 4.

1. Describe your utility’s service territory and provide a summary of any critical services or regionally important customers/members in your service territory. Critical community services include but are not limited to health care facilities, communications facilities, water facilities, and critical care facilities.

2. Describe the economic conditions of the communities you serve and the proportion of the population in your service territory that is located in a disadvantaged community.

3. What program(s) does your utility provide to assist minority, low-income, or other disadvantaged communities in your service territory?

4. How many hours of paid on-the-job IT or cybersecurity training do you anticipate staff will receive over the course of this prize?

1.3.2 Letter of Support
You are required to attach a one-page letter of support, intent, and commitment signed by your utility’s authorizing official. This letter must state that the official supports your utility’s submission package for the Commitment Prize. The letter should also recognize that successfully competing in the ACT 1 Prize Program will require an ongoing commitment of staff time and resources, and the official is supportive of the use of staff time and resources for this purpose. Your utility’s letter of support will be considered by Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

the prize reviewers and will count in the evaluation of your submission package. Do not submit multipage letters.

Only one letter of support is required for the Commitment Prize submission package. Additional letters and general letters of support will not improve your score.

1.3.3 Utility Profile Form
Use the Utility Profile Form to provide information about your utility and its service territory and information about your utility’s access to cybersecurity training, resources, and consulting services. The Utility Profile Form collects data on the number and types of employees at your utility relative to the number of members your utility serves; your organizational budget, cybersecurity, and IT expenses; the population density of your service territory; critical services and infrastructure in your territory; and disadvantaged communities in your territory. This form also collects data about the services you are providing to your community.

You can use this information to support your responses in the narrative, and it will be used by the prize reviewers in the evaluation of your Commitment Prize submission package. If you win a Commitment Prize and you decide to compete in the second phase, your TA provider will be required to verify the information provided in your Utility Profile Form as part of your Planning Prize submission package.

We encourage you to use the RMUC Utility Service Territory Report and publicly available tools such as CEJST, Energy Justice Mapping Tool, the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations Rural or Remote Area Geospatial Dashboard, and any additional resources to complete your Utility Profile. The RMUC Utility Service Territory Report provides basic information about the communities in your utility’s service territory.

1.3.4 RMUC Utility Service Territory Report
A RMUC Utility Service Territory Report will be available to your utility after you participate in one of the required ACT 1 Prize Workshops (see Section 1.3.6). Instructions will be provided during the workshop on how to access your RMUC Utility Service Territory Report. This report will include an estimated map of your utility’s service territory, the number of census tracts that have been defined as disadvantage community census tracts using metrics defined by the Council on Environmental Quality’s CEJST6, and other information that will be useful to your utility when completing your Utility Profile Form and your narrative responses.

If you are provided with an RMUC Utility Service Territory Report, you must include it as part of your submission package. If a report was not available for your utility, upload a document that lists the sources of information your utility used to complete your Utility Profile Form and narrative—for example, list any websites, internal records, census data, or other sources of data you used to complete your Utility Profile Form.
6 https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/en/about#3/33.47/-97.5.

Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

1.3.5 TA Request Form
All utilities must complete the TA Request Form provided to be eligible to compete for a Commitment Prize. Using the TA Request Form, select the TA topics that would benefit your utility in the next phase of the Prize Program.

Your TA Request Form will not be used by the prize reviewers in the evaluation of your submission package. The information on your TA Request Form will not affect your score. However, submission of your TA Request Form is required for your Commitment Prize submission package to be considered complete. Incomplete submission packages will be ineligible to compete and will not be forwarded to the reviewer panel for scoring.

The TA Request Forms will be shared with the ACT 1 Prize Administrator. If your utility wins a Commitment Prize, the Prize Administrator will use this form to assess your utility’s needs and identify appropriate wellqualified TA providers to work with you during the next phase Planning. TA providers will execute nondisclosure agreements with your utility and will not share specific information that would identify an individual utility’s systems or cybersecurity risks with DOE.

Every winner of a Commitment Prize will have access to up to 60 or 120 hours of TA (depending on the Prize Track) from a qualified cybersecurity provider at no cost to the utility starting on the date of selection for the Commitment Prize winners. Winners will receive vouchers that they can redeem to receive the TA.

Commitment Prize winners are not required to utilize all of their TA hours. All Commitment Prize winners will have until the Planning Prize winners are announced to use their vouchers. Planning Prize winners may carry over any unused TA hours into the third phase, Implementation.

1.3.6 Mandatory ACT 1 Virtual Prize Workshops Confirmation The ACT 1 Prize Program will hold two virtual prize workshops. The first workshop will address the prize administrative processes, requirements, overview, and Phase 1 application information. The second workshop will go into more detail on how to use the RMUC Utility Service Territory Report, how TA will be provided, and the technical requirements to complete a prize application.

Completion of these workshops is mandatory to be eligible for a Commitment Prize. The workshops will be offered live and recorded. If your utility cannot make the live sessions, you will be able to access the recorded versions up until November 22, 2023, which is one week before the Commitment Prize submission deadline. One person from your utility must complete each workshop, but it does not have to be the same person. Your utility’s primary point of contact for the ACT 1 Commitment Prize must confirm the registration and attendance of your utility’s workshop participants for each of the two mandatory prize workshops as part of your Commitment Prize submission package. Your utility’s point of contact must submit a written letter addressed to the ACT 1 Prize Administrator stating the name, title, email address, and utility name and address for each person that completed the workshop, and providing the date each person completed the workshop. This letter must be signed by the point of contact.

Your mandatory attendance confirmation letter will not be used by the prize reviewers in the evaluation of your submission package. The information in this letter will not affect your score. However, submission of your mandatory attendance confirmation letter is required for your Commitment Prize submission package to be considered complete. Incomplete submission packages will be ineligible to compete and will not be forwarded to the reviewer panel for scoring.

Workshop announcements with the dates and times will be posted on HeroX, announced on DOE’s RMUC Program website, and announced to everyone on the RMUC Program email list.

Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

1.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged
The following information will be used by the reviewers to judge your Commitment Prize submission package:
• Narrative
• Authorizing official letter of support
• Utility Profile Form
• RMUC Utility Service Territory Report.

After reviewing these four items in your submission package, expert reviewers will use the point scale in the table below to assign a score between 1 and 6 for each bulleted statement listed.

Your cover page, TA Request Form, and Mandatory Workshop Attendance Confirmation Letter will not be included in the scoring of your submission package but will be required for your submission package to be considered complete.

Point Scale Used by Reviewers
1 2 3 4 5 6
Strongly disagree Disagree Slightly disagree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree Expert reviewers give a score of 1 to 6 for each statement below (maximum score 90 points):

Commitment Criterion 1: Utility Need and Cybersecurity Maturity Level (maximum 24 points)
• The utility identified relevant conditions that create significant barriers to improving its cybersecurity posture.
• If the utility is defining itself as a MILITARY track utility, the utility identified at least one military installation that is in its service territory. If the utility is defining itself as a LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES utility, it included the factors listed below, or other relevant factors, in its description to justify why it should be considered a LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES utility (Reviewers will consider both the response to Narrative Topic 1 and the Utility Profile Form.). o Limited geographic access to service providers
o Limited geographic access to cybersecurity training
o Limited staff knowledge, skills, and abilities to use and maintain existing off-the-shelf cybersecurity solutions
o Limited number of staff relative to its service territory and number of customers/members served
o Limited ability to afford existing off-the-shelf cybersecurity solutions o Limited annual income based on energy sales.
• The utility described specific and appropriate measures it will take to protect the confidentiality and integrity of information in its submission package.
• The examples, descriptions, and/or summaries of results from cybersecurity assessments the utility Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

described support the cybersecurity maturity level it selected.

Commitment Criterion 2: Initial Goals, Expected Outcomes, and Impacts on Utility (maximum 18 points)
• The utility described cybersecurity problem(s) or challenge(s) that are relevant and important cybersecurity issues to address.
• The utility’s plan for how it would use the prize funding and TA is achievable within the estimated timeframe and is highly likely to be successful in resolving the problem(s) or challenge(s) it identified.
• The utility identified goals that are likely to have a substantial impact on improving the cybersecurity posture of the utility.

Commitment Criterion 3: Commitment to Implement Cybersecurity Improvements and Capacity to Utilize TA (maximum 24 points)
• The utility committed relevant job roles and sufficient staff time to work with and fully utilize TA providers (Reviewers will consider the letter of support to assess staff resources allocated, the utility profile data to evaluate the allocation of staff resources relative to the size of the utility, and the response to Narrative Topic 3.).
• The utility demonstrated a commitment to success by including all relevant staff positions (e.g., operations, IT, engineering, leadership, management, finance, legal, communications, etc.) in its Prize Team, defining appropriate roles and responsibilities, and setting expectations that this effort will require technical and nontechnical staff participation. • The utility has comprehensively identified likely challenges and proposed realistic and actionable solutions to successfully resolve those challenges.
• The utility’s senior leadership has taken actions that demonstrate strong support for participation in the Commitment Phase and the subsequent phases of the ACT 1 Prize Program (Reviewers will consider the letter of support and the response to Narrative Topic 3.).

Commitment Criterion 4: Service Territory and Community Benefits (maximum 24 points) • The utility’s service territory includes a substantial number of entities that provide critical services to the community or region, including but not limited to health care facilities, communications facilities, water facilities, and critical care facilities (Reviewers will consider the utility profile, RMUC Utility Service Territory Report, and response to Narrative Topic 4.). • The utility serves a very high proportion of members/customers who live in disadvantaged communities within its service territory (Reviewers will consider the utility profile and response to Narrative Topic 4.).
• The utility has many programs that provide relevant and substantial assistance to help minority, lowincome, and disadvantaged communities within their service territory (Reviewers will consider the utility profile and response to Narrative Topic 4.).

Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

• The utility demonstrates a strong commitment to providing paid on-the-job training that will enable employees to improve their cybersecurity knowledge, skills, and abilities.

Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

2 Planning Phase

2.1 Goal
In the Planning Phase, utilities will conduct assessments of their network and system architecture and their technology tools. This information will be used by the utility to identify cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, prioritize potential solutions, and develop roadmaps and budgets to support improvements to the utility’s cybersecurity posture. In addition, utilities will begin work on their Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan.

Submission packages for the Planning Prize will be evaluated based on the following criteria (See Section

2.4):
• Criteria 1: Identifying Gaps and Prioritizing Risks
• Criteria 2: Drafting Roadmaps
• Criteria 3: Project Risks
• Criteria 4: Institutionalizing a Culture of Continuous Improvement • Criteria 5: Estimated Roadmap Budget
• Criteria 6: Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan.

A successful Planning Prize submission package will demonstrate that the utility has:

1. Completed a network and system architecture review7

2. Completed a cybersecurity technology stack assessment8

3. Analyzed the results of the architecture review and stack assessment and created a cybersecurity gap/risk analysis

4. Utilized the cybersecurity gap/risk analysis to identify priority risks

5. Developed a draft cybersecurity roadmap for improvements that includes solutions for staff training, changes in policies and procedures, and changes to technologies

6. Established program management processes to address common project risks

7. Identified technical risks and developed mitigation options

8. Created repeatable processes to assess and prioritize cybersecurity risks

9. Completed a draft budget for the implementation roadmap

10. Completed an initial Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan.

Priority will be given to utilities that: engage all relevant staff in the discussion and prioritization of cybersecurity risks and solutions; select solutions that address prioritized risks; establish clear roles, responsibilities, and program management strategies that can maximize the likelihood of success; and 7 A network and system architecture review results in a network map/topology showing the logical structure and digital connections between the utility’s assets and systems. It is used to help identify cybersecurity weaknesses.
8 The cybersecurity technology stack assessment examines existing technology tools that affect the utility’s cybersecurity posture. Tools may be primarily cybersecurity technologies, but other tools (IT and OT) may also be included in the assessment if they can impact the utility’s enterprise or operational cybersecurity. Results from a stack assessment might include identifying opportunities for simplifying or improving the effectiveness of the stack without degrading cybersecurity, and gaps in coverage where additional tools or nontechnical solutions could reduce cybersecurity risks.

Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

create long-term processes for continuous improvements in the ability to identify and prioritize cybersecurity risks.

2.2 Prize Amounts and Important Dates
Up to 25 LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCES winners will each receive a cash prize of $50,000 in the Planning Prize and will be provided with vouchers for up to 60 hours of TA. Up to five MILITARY track winners will each receive a cash prize of $50,000 in the Planning Prize and will be provided with vouchers for up to 120 hours of TA.
• Planning Phase Opens: March 2024
• Planning Phase Submission Package Deadline: August 2024.

2.3 What to Submit for Planning Prize
To apply for a Planning Prize, the Planning Phase submission package must include all the items listed below:

1. Cover page and narrative

2. Estimated roadmap budget, including detailed annual costs

3. A letter of support from your utility authorizing your submission (CEO, general manager, or board of directors)

4. A letter of support from your utility’s finance department

5. Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan confirmation

6. TA Provider Review Form (use form provided)

7. TA Request Form (use form provided).

Each of these seven items must be uploaded as a PDF and submitted through the HeroX platform. Each item is described in more detail in the following sections. Your submission will not be considered if it does not include all seven items listed above. Recommended templates are available to use for the narrative, letter of support from your utility’s authorizing official, letter of support from your finance department, and Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan confirmation.

To effectively utilize the funding and TA provided, winning utilities will need leadership support and a commitment of staff time and attention.

If your utility decides to compete in the third phase of this prize, the Implementation Phase, you will use the TA you won in the Planning Phase to partner with at least one ACT 1 Prize Program TA provider to review the work completed during the Implementation Phase.

2.3.1 Cover Page and Narrative
Cover Page
Your submission package cover page should include the following information:
• Planning Prize project title
Do not include specific
cybersecurity vulnerabilities,
risks, or other sensitive
information in any of your
application materials.

Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

• Organization name
• City, state, and nine-digit zip code
• Primary point of contact for ACT 1 Planning Prize submission package (name, title, email, phone number)
• List of names and job titles for all members of your utility’s Planning Prize team.

In your narrative, you should respond to all the questions under each of the following four topic sections.

There is not a specific word limit for each topic section, but the aggregate response to all four sections must not exceed 3,000 words. A word count must be included at the end of your submission. The word count does not include captions, figures/graphs, or references. You may include up to five supporting images, figures, or graphs. Information contained in hyperlinks to external sources, and any text or graphics beyond the designated limits will not be reviewed or considered by reviewers or the judge. The reviewers will score your responses to the questions below based on criteria defined in Section 2.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged. It is recommended that you read the scoring criteria and understand how the reviewers will judge your responses to the narrative questions to help guide what you write in your narrative.

Planning Prize Narrative
Planning Prize Topic 1: Identifying Gaps and Prioritizing Risks NOTE: Due to the potential sensitivity of this information, do not mention or list any specific technologies, brands, model numbers, vendors, specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities or risks, or other sensitive information in your response.

1. Briefly summarize the major findings from your cybersecurity architecture review and stack assessment (do not provide specific details).

2. If your gap/risk analysis included information from an architecture review or technology stack assessment of your utility’s operational systems or any other information, including other assessment methods, describe what other information was used in your gap/risk analysis.

3. Describe the criteria your utility used to determine which risks identified in your utility’s cybersecurity gap/risk analysis would be addressed first.

4. Describe the process used to discuss the gap/risk analysis results and the decision-making process used to prioritize risks.

Planning Prize Topic 2: Drafting Roadmaps
NOTE: Due to the potential sensitivity of this information, do not mention or list any specific technologies, brands, model numbers, vendors, or specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities or risks, or other sensitive information in your response.

1. Describe the criteria your utility used to decide whether the best solution to address a high-priority risk was a technical, people (e.g., staff training, hiring new staff, etc.), or policy/procedure solution, or a combination of the three.

Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

2. Describe the process used to engage with your utility staff to help select solutions.

3. Describe the status of your draft roadmap and what additional information your utility will need before it can finalize its roadmap. DO NOT upload roadmaps to HeroX! Planning Prize Topic 3: Project Risks
Common risks affecting the success of a project are ineffective or inadequate internal communications and unclear expectations between technical and nontechnical staff. Another risk is the inability of staff to continue to operate and maintain solutions that require technical expertise. Technical risks that could affect the success of a project include supply chain availability and interoperability and integration challenges associated with combining new technologies with legacy technologies. Consider these and other risks to your success and how you will address them in the following questions.

1. Describe the names, titles, experience, and roles and responsibilities of the technical and nontechnical staff, and any third parties, who are part of your Planning Team, and whether you anticipate needing to add any additional team members to successfully implement your roadmap.

2. Describe the program management approach you created to ensure all technical and nontechnical staff receive relevant and timely information to support your implementation efforts.

3. Describe how you will engage and educate nontechnical staff who need to change their behavior to ensure a solution you have selected is successful after its implementation.

4. How will you maintain and update solutions after they are implemented?

5. What cybersecurity challenges or other technical challenges do you anticipate when integrating new solutions into your existing technology stack, and how will you address them? Planning Prize Topic 4: Institutionalizing a Culture of Continuous Improvement Documenting your selection criteria and processes used to complete the Planning Phase work can provide your utility with policies and repeatable procedures that can be institutionalized. Lessons learned during the Planning Phase can help your utility improve its cybersecurity maturity and capacity to repeat these processes as new risks emerge.

1. Based on the lessons your utility learned during the Planning Phase, what criteria and processes will your utility use in the future to prioritize risks and solutions?

2. Describe any actions your utility has taken to document cybersecurity risk identification and prioritization criteria and processes, any changes made in job roles or responsibilities, or changes made to your utility’s policies or procedures as a result of the lessons your utility learned during the Planning Phase.

3. Describe your utility’s strategy to periodically reassess cybersecurity risks in the future.

2.3.2 Estimated Roadmap Budget and Letters of Support
To compete for a Planning Prize, you will need to submit an estimated roadmap budget, an estimated budget for the annual expenses associated with the post-implementation maintenance of your solutions, a letter from your utility authorizing submission, and a letter from your finance department. The descriptions below provide more details for the required documents.

Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

1) Provide a copy of the estimated monthly budget to support the implementation of your roadmap that includes all costs through the time required to fully implement your roadmap. For all solutions that would require additional funding or staff time/resources to sustain the solutions beyond the implementation phase, provide detailed estimated annual costs to maintain and operate these solutions.

You are required to attach the following two letters of support. Each letter should be one page long and signed by the appropriate staff member.
2) Letter of support from your utility authorizing your submission package. This letter must state that your utility supports your submission package for the Planning Prize. The letter should also recognize that successfully competing in the ACT 1 Prize Program will require an ongoing commitment of staff time and resources and the utility is supportive of the use of staff time and resources for this purpose. The letter must include a statement that the official signing the letter is authorized to make these commitments.
3) Letter of support from your utility’s finance department that indicates that it has reviewed and approved the proposed estimated roadmap budget and the estimated costs to maintain and operate solutions after implementation.

General letters of support from parties that are not critical to the execution of your solution will not factor into your score. Do not submit multipage letters.

2.3.3 Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan Confirmation
All utilities competing for a Planning Prize must document that they have completed a draft of their utility’s Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan as part of their submission package. Your utility must create a single-page written letter that describes the steps your utility has taken to complete your Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan. This confirmation letter must be signed by the appropriate staff member and uploaded as part of your Planning Prize submission package.

You will be able to work with the Section 40126 team at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to help you complete your Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan at no cost. The PNNL team is dedicated to providing TA specifically focused on helping organizations complete these plans. The TA provided by the PNNL team is in addition to the 60 hours of TA that a Commitment Prize winner will receive. The Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plans are separated into high-, medium-, and low-risk project categories, and each category has a unique cybersecurity plan template. Utilities competing for a Planning Prize will work with the PNNL team to determine which template is appropriate.

For additional information and to view and download the templates, see:
https://www.energy.gov/ceser/bipartisan-infrastructure-law-implementation. This website also provides a link to the instructions on how to submit your utility’s Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan to the PNNL team. Do not upload your Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan to HeroX!

2.3.4 TA Provider Review Form
DOE does not want your utility to submit sensitive information about your utility’s systems in your prize submission package. Therefore, to verify that the actions required in the Planning Phase have been completed appropriately, an ACT 1 TA Provider will review the products of your Planning Phase and provide the results of that review using the TA Provider Review Form.

You must submit this form to demonstrate that you have received feedback from an ACT 1 TA provider.

This form must be signed by the TA Provider. The TA Provider will be responsible for:

Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

1) Confirming that the information submitted in the utility profile has been reviewed and verified 2) Commenting on the quality of the network and systems architecture review and the cybersecurity technology stack assessment and that these tasks were completed 3) Reviewing and commenting on the gap/risk analysis criteria and process used, and the results 4) Reviewing and commenting on the proposed cybersecurity roadmap, whether it is appropriately comprehensive, and whether the solutions selected are justified and appropriately prioritized based on the gap/risk analysis
5) Reviewing and commenting on the estimated roadmap budget and estimated costs for maintaining solutions after their implementation, and whether these estimates: include all relevant costs associated with the roadmap and post-implementation maintenance; contain reasonable costs; and reflect a realistic pace for the roadmap work to be completed, especially considering the utility’s timeline of when roadmap costs will be incurred.

You are responsible for ensuring that your TA Provider completes this form, and you must include the TA Provider Review Form in your Planning Prize submission package.

Do not upload or submit the review, assessment, analysis, or roadmap! Only the TA Provider Review Form should be included in your submission package.

2.3.5 TA Request Form
You will use the TA Request form to identify areas where your utility would benefit from assistance in the next phase of the Prize Program. All utilities must complete the TA Request Form to be eligible to compete for a Planning Prize.

Your TA Request form will not be used by the prize reviewers in the evaluation of your submission package and will not affect your score. However, submission of your TA Request form is required for your Planning Prize submission package to be considered complete. Incomplete submission packages will be ineligible to compete and will not be forwarded to the reviewer panel for scoring.

The TA Request forms will be shared with the Prize Administrator. If your utility wins a Planning Prize, the Prize Administrator will use this form to identify cybersecurity providers to work with you during the next phase, Implementation. TA providers will execute nondisclosure agreements and will not be sharing cybersecurity details with DOE.

Every winner of a Planning Prize will have access to up to either 60 or 120 hours of TA (depending on the Prize Track) from a cybersecurity provider at no cost. Winners will receive vouchers that they can redeem to receive the TA. Planning Prize winners are not required to utilize all of their TA hours. Utilities will have until the Implementation Prize winners are announced to use their vouchers.

2.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged
The following information will be used by the reviewers to judge your Planning Prize submission package:
1) Narrative
2) Authorizing official letter of support
3) Letter of support from finance department
4) Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan Confirmation
5) TA Provider Review Form.

Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

After reviewing these items in your submission package, expert reviewers will assign a score between 1 and 6 for each bulleted statement listed below.

Your cover page and TA Request Form will not be included in the scoring of your submission package but will be required for your submission package to be considered complete.

Point Scale Used by Reviewers
1 2 3 4 5 6
Strongly disagree Disagree Slightly Disagree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree Expert reviewers give a score of 1 to 6 for each statement below (maximum score 120 points):

Planning Criterion 1: Identifying Gaps and Prioritizing Risks (maximum 24 points) • The review and assessment were completed, and the utility identified relevant high-level categories of cybersecurity risk areas to address (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and Narrative Topic 1.).
• The utility did not limit its assessment to its business systems and was proactive and comprehensive in assessing its OT systems and including other relevant information (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and Narrative Topic 1.). • The utility identified appropriate and specific decision criteria to prioritize risks that can be used in a repeatable process.
• The utility identified departments where cybersecurity risks were found and included all relevant technical and nontechnical job roles from those departments in discussions on: the gap/risk analysis results; the cybersecurity implications of those results within each department; and how to prioritize the risks and decide which risks to address first (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and Narrative Topic 1.).

Planning Criterion 2: Drafting Roadmaps (maximum 18 points) • The utility did not rely on only technical solutions and used reasonable criteria to decide whether the best solution to address a specific risk should be technical, people (e.g., staff training, hiring new, etc.), changes to policies/procedures, or a combination of the three (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and Narrative Topic 2.).
• The utility used a process that included all relevant technical and nontechnical department staff in discussions on what solutions to prioritize and communicated how the possible solutions might impact the other departments and their staff before solutions were selected. • The utility completed a draft roadmap to implement solutions that would address the highest-priority risks and identified key issues that need to be resolved before it can finalize its roadmap (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and Narrative Topics 1 and 2.).

Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Planning Criterion 3: Project Risks (maximum 30 points) • The utility has clearly described the roles and responsibilities of all staff, technical and nontechnical, required to ensure successful implementation of their roadmap (Reviewers will consider both the submitted budget from Task 3 and Narrative Topic 4.).
• The utility has established an appropriate and effective program management strategy for ongoing communications to ensure all relevant parties are informed in a timely manner. • The utility has identified which solutions will require participation from other utility staff to be successful and has described approaches that are highly likely to achieve buy-in by the relevant nontechnical utility staff.
• The utility has described an appropriate process to ensure the continued effective use of solutions that will require additional training of existing staff or has secured leadership commitments to cover post-implementation costs associated with the ongoing maintenance of solutions after the Prize Program ends.
• The utility has identified realistic potential integration challenges that could negatively impact the successful implementation of its solutions or the cybersecurity of its systems after the solutions have been implemented and has described effective processes to mitigate anticipated delays and challenges.

Planning Criterion 4: Institutionalizing a Culture of Continuous Improvement (maximum 18 points)
• The utility thoroughly evaluated the criteria and processes it used during the Planning Phase and described what worked and what did not work, and identified specific criteria and processes it can use in the future to identify and prioritize cybersecurity risks and to evaluate and prioritize possible solutions (Reviewers will consider Narrative Topics 1- 4.). • The utility reviewed lessons learned during the Planning Phase and described specific actions it has taken to institutionalize these lessons by making changes in processes, policies, or procedures, or in job roles and responsibilities.
• The utility developed a strategy for future periodic cybersecurity risk assessments that might be triggered by new projects and that ensures all relevant job roles participate in identifying risks and in selecting solutions (Reviewers will consider Narrative Topics 1, 2, and 4.).

Planning Criterion 5: Estimated Roadmap Budget (maximum 24 points) • The utility’s estimated budgets include all the relevant costs associated with the complete implementation of its roadmap and annual costs to sustain solutions after implementation (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and estimated roadmap budget.). • The utility’s estimated costs are reasonable (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and estimated roadmap budget.).
• The utility’s monthly timeline of when costs are incurred reflects a realistic pace for the work to be completed (Reviewers will consider both the TA Provider Review Form and estimated roadmap budget.).
• The utility’s finance department has reviewed and approved the estimated roadmap budget and annual post-implementation costs to sustain the solutions (Reviewers will consider the letter of Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

support from the utility’s finance department.).

Planning Criterion 6: Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan (maximum 6 points) • The utility has drafted a Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan and is working with the Section 40126 PNNL team to finalize the plan. (Reviewers will consider the utility’s Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan confirmation letter. A score of zero indicates they have not begun their plan, a score of three indicates that they have begun engaging with PNNL but have not put forth adequate effort to engage with the PNNL team, and a score of six indicates that they are actively engaging with the PNNL team to finalize the plan, or the plan is final.)

Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

3 Implementation Phase

3.1 Goal
In the Implementation Phase, utilities will collaborate with TA providers and industry experts to implement the solutions outlined in the Planning Phase. The TA providers will help utilities identify potential solutions, develop criteria for selecting appropriate solutions, coach utilities on negotiating favorable service-level agreements and contracts, facilitate continued use planning for new technologies, assist with the implementation of technology solutions, and support the development of processes to confirm the cybersecurity of solutions after they are implemented.

Submission packages for the Implementation Prize will be evaluated based on the following criteria (See Section 3.4):
• Criteria 1: Documented Progress
• Criteria 2: Likelihood of Continued Progress
• Criteria 3: Commitment
• Criteria 4: Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan.

A successful Implementation Prize submission package will demonstrate that the utility has:

1. Completed its roadmap budget

2. Made significant progress implementing its roadmap

3. Developed a process to test the cybersecurity of its systems after full integration of solutions

4. Committed to continue to implement its roadmap

5. Completed its Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan.

Priority will be given to utilities that demonstrate a strong commitment to completing their roadmaps, that include solutions that specifically improve the cybersecurity posture of operational systems in the utility, can be maintained by the existing utility staff with minimal additional TA, and have strong leadership support, as evidenced by supporting documents such as long-term budget commitments.

3.2 Prize Amounts and Important Dates
Up to 25 LIMITED CYBERSECURITY RESOURCE TRACK and 5 MILITARY TRACK winners will each receive a cash prize of $100,000.
• Implementation Phase Opens: October 2024
• Implementation Phase Submission Package Deadline: January 2025.

3.3 What to Submit for the Implementation Prize
To apply for an Implementation Prize, the Implementation Phase submission package must include all the items listed below:

1. Cover page and narrative

2. Approved final roadmap budget and post-implementation cost estimate

3. A letter from your finance department
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

4. Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan Progress Confirmation

5. TA Provider Review (use form provided).

You are strongly encouraged to submit any additional supporting documents as part of your submission package (see Section 3.3.2).

Each of these items must be uploaded as a PDF and submitted through the HeroX platform. Each item is described in more detail in the following sections. Your submission will not be considered complete if it does not include all five of the required items listed above. Recommended templates are available to use for the narrative, letter from your organization’s finance department, and Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan Progress Confirmation.

3.3.1 Cover Page and Narrative
Cover Page
Your submission package cover page should include the following information:
• Implementation Prize project title
• Organization name
• City, state, and nine-digit zip code
• Primary point of contact for ACT 1 Implementation Prize submission package (name, title, email, phone number)
• List of names and job titles for all members of your utility’s Implementation Prize team.

In your narrative, you should respond to all the questions under each of the following two topic sections.

There is not a specific word limit for each topic section, but the aggregate response to both sections must not exceed 3,000 words. A word count must be included at the end of your submission. The word count does not include captions, figures/graphs, or references. You may include up to five supporting images, figures, or graphs. Information contained in hyperlinks to external sources, and any text or graphics beyond the designated limits, will not be reviewed or considered by reviewers or the judge.

The reviewers will score your responses to the questions below based on criteria defined in Section 3.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged. It is recommended that you read the scoring criteria and understand how the reviewers will judge your responses to the narrative questions to help guide what you write in your narrative.

Implementation Prize Narrative
Implementation Prize Topic 1: Documented Progress
NOTE: Due to the potential sensitivity of this information, do not mention or list any specific technologies, brands, model numbers, vendors, specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities or risks, or other sensitive information in your response.

Do not include specific
cybersecurity vulnerabilities,
risks, or other sensitive
information in any of your
application materials.

Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

1. Describe your utility’s progress implementing your roadmap. What work has been completed?

2. How has the progress you have made implementing your roadmap improved the cybersecurity posture of your utility’s IT systems?

3. How have the changes you have made improved the cybersecurity of your utility’s operational systems?

4. Describe the process you used to engage nontechnical staff in changing their behavior to ensure solutions were effective and how you measured the success of this process.

5. What actions did your utility take to minimize third-party cybersecurity risks associated with solution identification, solution selection, and contract/purchase negotiations with solution providers?

6. At the time of submission, how many hours of paid on-the-job IT or cybersecurity training did staff receive over the course of this prize?
Implementation Prize Topic 2: Likelihood of Continued Progress NOTE: Due to the potential sensitivity of this information, do not mention or list any specific technologies, brands, model numbers, vendors, specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities or risks, or other sensitive information in your response.

1. What work remains in your roadmap, what delays have you experienced and how did you resolve them, and what is your current timeline to complete the remaining work?

2. How will you operate, maintain, and update the solutions in your roadmap?

3. What processes, policies, and procedures have you established to periodically reassess cybersecurity risks in your utility?

4. What processes, policies, and procedures have you established to adequately test the cybersecurity of the remaining solutions in your roadmap after they are fully implemented and to test future technology deployments after full implementation?

5. What processes have you created to enable ongoing communications with senior leadership about the business value that results from the cybersecurity investments your utility has made during the ACT 1 Prize Program?

6. How has your utility benefited from participating in the ACT 1 Prize Program so far, and what would you do differently?

3.3.2 Roadmap Budget and Letters of Support
To compete for an Implementation Prize, you will need to submit a final roadmap budget, a budget for the annual expenses associated with the post-implementation maintenance of your solutions, and a letter from your finance department. The descriptions below provide more details for the required documents. 1) You are required to attach a copy of your final budget and associated timeline for the implementation of your roadmap and a final budget for annual costs associated with the continued maintenance and operations of the solutions you selected. Your final roadmap budget should cover the costs by month Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

required to fully implement your plan and include a breakdown of estimated costs associated with personnel, software licenses and fees, hardware/firmware, materials/components/equipment, service contracts (for both IT services and OT cybersecurity services), consultants, training, etc. Your post-implementation budget should include the annual costs for personnel, software licenses and fees, service contracts (for both IT services and OT cybersecurity services), consultants, training, etc. 2) You are required to provide a signed letter of support on your organization’s letterhead from your organization’s finance department that indicates that the appropriate finance person has reviewed and approved your final roadmap budget and post-implementation budget.

In addition to these required documents, you are encouraged to provide additional letters or evidence of your utility’s commitment to complete its roadmap. Provide as much evidence as you can of your utility’s long-term commitment to complete your roadmap. For example:
a) A signed letter from your utility supporting the necessary budget to cover the annual postimplementation costs and that states the number of years that this funding will be included in your utility’s annual budget request. The letter must include a statement that the official signing the letter is authorized to make these commitments.
b) A utility board or local government resolution describing the governing body’s commitment to fully support the utility’s staff time and funding resources to complete its roadmap. c) A letter of intent from the city manager, mayor, or county commissioner to support the utility’s staff time, efforts, and funding allocations to implement the plan (if applicable). d) Copies of press releases and any press coverage, social media postings, published articles, external communications with stakeholders, and other utility communications celebrating your utility’s success in winning Commitment and Planning Prizes. e) A letter from your utility’s communications team describing their communications plan for press releases, social media postings, and other public efforts to celebrate your utility’s success if you win an Implementation Prize.
f) Other documents demonstrating a long-term commitment.

General letters of support from parties that are not critical to the execution of your solution will not factor into your score.

3.3.3 Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan
Competitors for an Implementation Prize must provide documentation of their work to complete the utility’s Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan. Below are the options:
• Your utility’s point of contact must submit a signed confirmation letter indicating that a Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan has been completed and that the plan has been securely transmitted to the PNNL team. This confirmation letter must be uploaded as part of your Implementation Prize submission package.
• If you have not completed your Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan, your utility must:
o Submit written documentation from the PNNL team that confirms the status of your Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan
o Submit a signed letter from the appropriate staff member at your utility describing why the plan is not complete and your utility’s timeline for completing the plan.

Additional information on the Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plans and access to the templates is available at: https://www.energy.gov/ceser/bipartisan-infrastructure-law-implementation.

Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Do not upload your Cybersecurity Plan to HeroX. All completed Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plans must be submitted directly to the PNNL team using the secure transmittal instructions found at the website listed above.

3.3.4TA Provider Review Form
DOE does not want your utility to submit sensitive information about your utility’s systems in your prize submission package. Therefore, to verify that the actions required in the Implementation Phase have been completed appropriately, an ACT 1 TA Provider will review the products of your Implementation Phase and provide the results of that review using the TA Provider Review Form.

You must submit this form to demonstrate that you have received feedback from an ACT 1 TA provider.

This form must be signed by the TA Provider. The TA Provider will be responsible for:
1) Confirmation that there is an appropriate process established to test that systems are secure after new technologies are installed
2) Review and comments on the success of processes used by the utility to engage nontechnical staff for any solutions that required staff behavioral changes for the solution to be successful in reducing cybersecurity risks
3) Review and comments on how the utility will ensure that all solutions can be effectively operated and maintained by the existing staff, or that sufficient funding has been budgeted for appropriate staff training and/or ongoing costs for necessary service providers 4) Review and comments on the final budget and whether: it includes all relevant costs associated with the roadmap; costs are reasonable; the utility’s timeline of when costs will be incurred reflects a realistic pace for the remaining work to be completed.

3.4 How Your Submission Will be Judged
The following information will be used by the reviewers to judge your Implementation Prize submission package:
1) Narrative
2) Finance staff letter of support
3) Final roadmap budget and budget for post-implementation costs 4) Additional supporting documents demonstrating long-term commitment 5) Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan Confirmation
6) TA Provider Review Form.

After reviewing these items in your submission package, expert reviewers will assign a score between 1 and 6 for each bulleted statement listed below.

Your cover page and TA Request Form will not be included in the scoring of your submission package but will be required for your submission package to be considered complete.

Point Scale Used by Reviewers
1 2 3 4 5 6
Strongly disagree Disagree Slightly disagree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Expert reviewers give a score of 1 to 6 for each statement below (maximum score 96 points):

Implementation Criterion 1: Documented Progress (maximum 36 points) • Given the time allotted, the utility made substantial progress toward completing its roadmap. • The utility provided compelling evidence that the changes they implemented resulted in an improvement in the cybersecurity posture of their IT systems. • The utility provided compelling evidence that they have made improvements in the cybersecurity of their OT systems.
• The utility implemented a highly successful process that resulted in staff behavioral changes that were necessary to the success of the solution (Reviewers should consider both the TA Provider Review Form and the response to Narrative Topic 1.).
• The utility used effective methods to identify and minimize third-party cybersecurity risks during the selection of solutions and in the contracting and purchasing stages. • The utility’s commitment to providing paid on-the-job training that enabled employees to improve their cybersecurity knowledge, skills, and abilities was supported by their response.

Implementation Criterion 2: Likelihood of Continued Progress (maximum 36 points) • The utility effectively addressed challenges and, considering the work that has been completed, the quantity of remaining work scheduled, and the proposed budget and timeline, it is highly likely the utility will complete its roadmap (Reviewers should consider the final budget submitted, TA Provider Review Form, and Narrative Topic 2.).
• The utility presented a realistic strategy that includes staff training and sufficient future budget allocations to effectively operate and maintain the cybersecurity solutions that are being implemented (Reviewers should consider both the final budget submitted and Narrative Topic 2.). • The utility described documented processes it has institutionalized that appropriately engage relevant staff members to identify new and emerging cybersecurity risks. • The utility developed and institutionalized appropriate processes to test the final configurations and settings of their technical solutions after implementation and to identify and address any cybersecurity risks that were discovered (Reviewers should consider both the TA Provider Review Form and response to Narrative Topic 2.).
• The utility has identified the most important economic benefits and cybersecurity risk reductions associated with the solutions being implemented and has established a process that is highly likely to be successful at effectively communicating these values to senior leadership. • The utility has demonstrated thoughtful reflection on how the work completed during the Commitment and Planning Phases has improved the cybersecurity capacity of its people and processes and institutionalized the lessons learned to facilitate continuous improvements in its cybersecurity posture.

Implementation Criterion 3: Commitment (maximum 18 points) • The utility leadership fully supports implementing plans developed under this prize (Reviewers Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

should consider the submitted budgets, letters of support or commitment, and Narrative Topic 2.). • The utility developed a realistic budget and timeline to implement the cybersecurity solutions in its roadmap and has identified and committed the support and resources necessary for the ongoing maintenance and operation costs of solutions after the roadmap is fully implemented (Reviewers should consider the submitted budgets, letters of support or commitment, and Narrative Topic 2.). • The additional evidence provided by the utility is compelling and supports the conclusion that it is committed to completing its roadmap and continuing to improve its cybersecurity (Reviewers should consider the submitted budgets, letters of support or commitment, and Narrative Topic 2.).

Implementation Criterion 4: Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan (maximum 6 points) • The utility has either completed or made substantial progress completing its Section 40126 Cybersecurity Plan and is working to address challenges in completing the plan (Reviewers will consider the signed confirmation or other written document submitted by the utility.).

Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

4 How We Determine Winners
A Prize Administrator will screen all submission packages for eligibility and confirm that all required documents are included in the submission package. The Prize Administrator, in consultation with DOE, will assemble a reviewer panel composed of subject matter experts and assign reviewers to independently score the content of each submission package. The expert reviewers may be composed of federal and nonfederal subject matter experts with expertise in relevant areas. Expert reviewers will review each submission package and provide a score for every criterion statement and a total score for each submission package. A final score for each submission package will be calculated and provided to the ACT 1 Prize Judge. The Prize Judge will consider the final scores and other factors to make a final determination of winners.

The expert reviewers and Prize Judge may not: (a) have personal or financial interests in, or be an employee, officer, director, or agent of any entity that is a registered participant in the prize; or (b) have a familial or financial relationship with an individual who is a registered participant.

4.1 How the Final Score for a Submission Package is
Calculated
The scoring of submission packages will proceed as follows:
● Experts will review each submission package individually. ● At least three expert reviewers will score each submission package. ● Reviewers will assign a score between 1 and 6 to each statement listed for each phase criterion.

A score of 1 indicates that the reviewer strongly disagrees that the information provided in the competitor’s submission package supports the statement, and a score of 6 indicates that the reviewer strongly agrees that the statement is supported by the information provided in the submission package.
● The reviewer’s score for each criterion will be calculated by adding together the scores for each statement associated with that criterion.
● The reviewer’s total score for the submission package will be calculated by adding together the reviewer’s scores for each of the criterion.
● The final score for the submission package will be calculated by averaging the total scores from each reviewer that read the same submission package. For example, if there are three reviewers for the same submission package, the final score will be the average of the three reviewers’ total scores.
● The final score will be used to inform the Prize Judge’s decision on winners.

Point Scale Used by Reviewers
1 2 3 4 5 6
Strongly disagree Disagree Slightly disagree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree

4.2 Program Policy Factors
While the scores of the expert reviewers will be carefully considered, it is the role of the Prize Judge to maximize the impact of prize funds. Some factors outside of the control of competitors and beyond the independent expert reviewers’ scope of review may need to be considered to accomplish this goal. The Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

following is a list of such factors. In addition to the reviewers’ scores, the program policy factors listed below may be considered by the Prize Judge in determining winners:
● Geographic diversity and potential economic impact of projects. ● Whether the use of additional DOE funds and provided resources is nonduplicative and compatible with the stated goals of the RMUC Program and the DOE mission generally. ● The degree to which the submission is likely to lead to increased employment and manufacturing in the United States or provide other economic benefits to U.S. taxpayers. ● The degree to which the submission supports complementary DOE-funded efforts or projects, which, when taken together, will best achieve the goals and objectives of DOE. ● The degree to which the submission expands DOE’s funding to new competitors and recipients who have not been supported by DOE in the past.
● The degree to which the submission enables new and expanding market segments. • Whether the project promotes increased coordination with nongovernmental entities toward enabling a just and equitable clean energy economy in their region and/or community. • The degree to which the submission enhances reliable access to electricity to disadvantaged or underserved communities.
• The degree to which the submission reduces the energy burden for customers/members in disadvantaged communities that are served by the utility. • The degree to which the utility operates Defense Critical Electric Infrastructure, defined as any electric infrastructure located in any of the 48 contiguous states or the District of Columbia that serves a facility designated by the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to section 215A(c) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. § 824o-1(c)), but is not owned or operated by the owner or operator of such facility. See paragraph (4) of Section 215A(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. § 824o-1(a)(4)). ● The presence of important community services, including healthcare facilities, communications facilities, water facilities, and critical care facilities. ● Presence of regionally important economic drivers.

4.3 Final Determination
DOE will designate a federal employee as the ACT 1 Prize Judge before the final determination of the winners. Final determination of the winners by the Prize Judge will consider the reviewers’ feedback and scores, your utility’s submission package, and program policy factors.

4.4 Announcement of Winners
Approximately 60 days after the phase closes, the Prize Administrator will notify the winners and request the necessary information to distribute the prizes. The Prize Administrator will then publicly announce the winners.

Additional Requirements
Competitors are responsible for reading and complying with additional requirements described in Appendix 1.

COMPETITORS WHO DO NOT COMPLY WITH ALL APPENDIX 1 REQUIREMENTS MAY BE DISQUALIFIED.

Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

5 RMUC Program Background
The IIJA, commonly referred to as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, directs DOE to invest $250 million in an RMUC Grant and Technical Assistance Program (RMUC Program) to improve the cybersecurity posture of eligible electric utilities. DOE will provide financial investments, TA, training, and other resources to enhance the cybersecurity posture of entities eligible to participate in the RMUC Program to help them protect against, detect, respond to, and recover from cybersecurity threats, and to increase their participation in cybersecurity threat information-sharing programs. Entities eligible to participate in the RMUC Program are:
• A rural electric cooperative
• A utility owned by a political subdivision of a state, such as a municipally owned electric utility • A utility owned by any agency, authority, corporation, or instrumentality of one or more political subdivisions of a state
• A not-for-profit entity that is in a partnership with no fewer than six entities described above • An investor-owned electric utility that sells less than 4,000,000 megawatt hours of electricity per year.

The RMUC Program is authorized to prioritize three segments of the eligible population: utilities with limited cybersecurity resources; utilities with assets critical to the reliability of the bulk power system; and utilities that own defense critical electric infrastructure. More information about the RMUC Program can be found at the RMUC Program website.

The ACT 1 Prize Program is one of the cornerstones of the RMUC Program intended to provide funding to reward eligible utilities for making informed decisions on purchasing and implementing solutions to address areas of highest risk. ACT 1 will focus on providing financial prizes and TA to eligible entities that have limited cybersecurity resources and/or serve military installations.

Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Appendix 1: Additional Terms and Conditions
A.1 Requirements
Your submission for the ACT 1 Prize Program is subject to the following terms and conditions:
● You must post the final content of your submission or upload the submission form before the submission period closes. Late submissions or any other form of submission may be rejected. ● All submissions that you wish to protect from public disclosure must be marked according to the instructions in Section 10 of Appendix 1 (Section A.10). Unmarked or improperly marked submissions will be deemed to have been provided with unlimited rights and may be used in any manner and for any purpose whatsoever.
● You must include all the required elements in your submission. The Prize Administrator may disqualify your submission after an initial screening if you fail to provide all required submission elements. Competitors may be given an opportunity to rectify submission errors due to technical challenges.
● Your submission must be in English and in a format readable by Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF.

Scanned handwritten submissions will be disqualified.
● Submissions will be disqualified if they contain any matter that, in the sole discretion of DOE or NREL, is indecent, obscene, defamatory, libelous, and/or lacking in professionalism, or demonstrates a lack of respect for people or life on this planet. ● If you click "Accept" on the HeroX platform and proceed to register for any of the prizes described in this document, these rules will form a valid and binding agreement between you and DOE and are in addition to the existing HeroX Terms of Use for all purposes relating to these contests. You should print and keep a copy of these rules. These provisions only apply to the prize described here and no other prize on the HeroX platform or anywhere else. ● The Prize Administrator, when feasible, may give competitors an opportunity to fix nonsubstantive mistakes or errors in their submission packages.
● As part of your submission to this prize, you will be required to sign the following statement:

I am providing this submission package as part of my participation in this prize. I understand that the information contained in this submission will be relied on by the federal government to determine whether to issue a prize to the named competitor. I certify under penalty of perjury that the named competitor meets the eligibility requirements for this prize competition and complies with all other rules contained in the Official Rules document. I further represent that the information contained in the submission is true and contains no misrepresentations. I understand false statements or misrepresentations to the federal government may result in civil and/or criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and § 287, and 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 and 3801-3812.

A.2 Verification for Payments
The Prize Administrator will verify the identity and role of all competitors before distributing any prizes.

Receiving a prize payment is contingent upon fulfilling all requirements contained herein. The Prize Administrator will notify winning competitors using provided email contact information for the individual or entity that was responsible for the submission. Each competitor will be required to sign and return to the Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

Prize Administrator, within 30 days of the date on the notice, a completed NREL Request for ACH Banking Information form and a completed W9 form (https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf). In the sole discretion of the Prize Administrator, a winning competitor will be disqualified from the competition and receive no prize funds if: (i) the person/entity does not respond to notifications; (ii) the person/entity fails to sign and return the required documentation within the required time period; (iii) the notification is returned as undeliverable; or (iv) the submission or person/entity is disqualified for any other reason.

In the event of a dispute as to any registration, the authorized account holder of the email address used to register will be deemed to be the competitor. The "authorized account holder" is the natural person or legal entity assigned an email address by an internet access provider, online service provider, or other organization responsible for assigning email addresses for the domain associated with the submitted address. All competitors may be required to show proof of being the authorized account holder.

A.3 Teams and Single-Entity Awards
The Prize Administrator will award a single dollar amount to the designated primary submitter, whether consisting of a single or multiple entities. The primary submitter is solely responsible for allocating any prize funds among its member competitors or teammates as they deem appropriate. The Prize Administrator will not arbitrate, intervene, advise on, or resolve any matters or disputes between team members or competitors.

A.4 Submission Rights
By making a submission and consenting to the rules of the contest, a competitor is granting to DOE, the Prize Administrator, and any other third parties supporting DOE in the contest, a license to display publicly and use the parts of the submission that are designated as “public” for government purposes. This license includes posting or linking to the public portions of the submission on the Prize Administrator or HeroX applications, including the contest website, DOE websites, and partner websites, and the inclusion of the submission in any other media worldwide. The submission may be viewed by DOE, Prize Administrator, and judges and reviewers for purposes of the contests, including but not limited to screening and evaluation purposes. The Prize Administrator and any third parties acting on their behalf will also have the right to publicize competitors’ names and, as applicable, the names of competitors’ team members and organization that participated in the submission on the contest website indefinitely.

By entering, the competitor represents and warrants that:

1. The competitor’s entire submission is an original work by the competitor, and the competitor has not included third-party content (such as writing, text, graphics, artwork, logos, photographs, likeness of any third party, musical recordings, clips of videos, television programs or motion pictures) in or in connection with the submission, unless: (i) otherwise requested by the Prize Administrator and/or disclosed by the competitor in the submission, and (ii) competitor has either obtained the rights to use such third-party content, or the content of the submission is considered in the public domain without any limitations on use.

2. Unless otherwise disclosed in the submission, the use thereof by Prize Administrator, or the exercise by Prize Administrator of any of the rights granted by competitor under these rules, does not and will not infringe or violate any rights of any third party or entity, including, without limitation, patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, defamation, privacy, publicity, false light, misappropriation, intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, confidentiality, or any contractual or other rights.

Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

3. All persons who were engaged by the competitor to work on the submission or who appear in the submission in any manner have:
a. Given the competitor their express written consent to submit the submission for exhibition and other exploitation in any manner and in any and all media, whether now existing or hereafter discovered, throughout the world
b. Provided written permission to include their name, image, or pictures in or with the submission (or, if a minor who is not competitor’s child, competitor must have the permission of the minor’s parent or legal guardian), and the competitor may be asked by the Prize Administrator to provide permission in writing c. Not been and are not currently under any union or guild agreement that results in any ongoing obligations resulting from the use, exhibition, or other exploitation of the submission.

A.5 Copyright
Each competitor represents and warrants that the competitor is the sole author and copyright owner of the submission; that the submission is an original work of the competitor or that the competitor has acquired sufficient rights to use and to authorize others, including DOE, to use the submission, as specified throughout the rules; that the submission does not infringe upon any copyright or any other third-party rights of which the competitor is aware; and that the submission is free of malware.

A.6 Contest Subject to Applicable Law
All contests are subject to all applicable federal laws and regulations. Participation constitutes each participant's full and unconditional agreement to these Official Rules and administrative decisions, which are final and binding in all matters related to the contest. This notice is not an obligation of funds; the final award is contingent upon the availability of appropriations.

A.7 Resolution of Disputes
DOE is solely responsible for administrative decisions, which are final and binding in all matters related to the contest.

Neither DOE nor the Prize Administrator will arbitrate, intervene, advise on, or resolve any matters between team members or among competitors.

A.8 Publicity
The winners of these prizes (collectively, "winners") will be featured on DOE and NREL websites.

Except where prohibited, participation in the contest constitutes each winner's consent to DOE's and its agents' use of each winner's name, likeness, photograph, voice, opinions, and/or hometown and state information for promotional purposes through any form of media worldwide, without further permission, payment, or consideration.

Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

A.9 Liability
Upon registration, all participants agree to assume any and all risks of injury or loss in connection with or in any way arising from participation in this contest. Upon registration, except in the case of willful misconduct, all participants agree to and thereby do waive and release any and all claims or causes of action against the federal government and its officers, employees, and agents for any and all injury and damage of any nature whatsoever (whether existing or thereafter arising, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, and whether foreseeable or not), arising from their participation in the contest, whether the claim or cause of action arises under contract or tort.

In accordance with the delegation of authority to run this contest delegated to the judge responsible for this prize, the judge has determined that no liability insurance naming DOE as an insured will be required of competitors to compete in this competition per 15 U.S.C. § 3719(i)(2). Competitors should assess the risks associated with their proposed activities and adequately insure themselves against possible losses.

A.10 Records Retention and Freedom of Information
Act
All materials submitted to DOE as part of a submission become DOE records and are subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The following applies only to portions of the submission not designated as public information in the instructions for submission. If a submission includes trade secrets or information that is commercial or financial, or information that is confidential or privileged, it is furnished to the government in confidence with the understanding that the information shall be used or disclosed only for evaluation of the application. Such information will be withheld from public disclosure to the extent permitted by law, including the Freedom of Information Act. Without assuming any liability for inadvertent disclosure, DOE will seek to limit disclosure of such information to its employees and to outside reviewers when necessary for review of the application or as otherwise authorized by law. This restriction does not limit the government’s right to use the information if it is obtained from another source.

Submissions containing confidential, proprietary, or privileged information must be marked as described below. Failure to comply with these marking requirements may result in the disclosure of the unmarked information under the Freedom of Information Act or otherwise. The U.S. government is not liable for the disclosure or use of unmarked information and may use or disclose such information for any purpose.

The submission must be marked as follows and identify the specific pages containing trade secrets, confidential, proprietary, or privileged information: “Notice of Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data:

Pages [list applicable pages] of this document may contain trade secrets, confidential, proprietary, or privileged information that is exempt from public disclosure. Such information shall be used or disclosed only for evaluation purposes. [End of Notice]”
The header and footer of every page that contains confidential, proprietary, or privileged information must be marked as follows: “Contains Trade Secrets, Confidential, Proprietary, or Privileged Information Exempt from Public Disclosure.” In addition, each line or paragraph containing proprietary, privileged, or trade secret information must be clearly marked with double brackets.

Competitors will be notified of any Freedom of Information Act requests for their submissions in accordance with 10 C.F.R. Part 1004. Competitors may then have the opportunity to review materials and Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

work with a Freedom of Information Act representative prior to the release of materials. DOE does intend to keep all submission materials private except for those materials designated as “will be made public.” IIJA §40124 (e) Protection of Information, states that information provided to, or collected by, the federal government pursuant to this section the disclosure of which the Secretary reasonably foresees could be detrimental to the physical security or cybersecurity of any electric utility or the bulk-power system:
(1) Shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of title 5, United States Code
(2) Shall not be made available by any Federal agency, State, political subdivision of a State, or Tribal authority pursuant to any Federal, State, political subdivision of a State, or Tribal law, respectively, requiring public disclosure of information or records.

A.11 Privacy
If you choose to provide HeroX with personal information by registering or completing the submission package through the contest website, you understand that such information will be transmitted to DOE and may be kept in a system of records. Such information will be used only to respond to you in matters regarding your submission and/or the contest unless you choose to receive updates or notifications about other contests or programs from DOE on an opt-in basis. DOE and NREL are not collecting any information for commercial marketing.

A.12 General Conditions
DOE reserves the right to cancel, suspend, and/or modify the prize, or any part of it, at any time. If any fraud, technical failures, or any other factor beyond DOE's reasonable control impairs the integrity or proper functioning of the prize, as determined by DOE in its sole discretion, DOE may cancel the prize. Any performance toward prize goals is conducted entirely at the risk of the competitor, and DOE shall not compensate any competitors for any activities performed in furtherance of this prize.

Although DOE may indicate that it will select up to several winners for each prize, DOE reserves the right to only select competitors that are likely to achieve the goals of the program. If, in DOE’s determination, no competitors are likely to achieve the goals of the program, DOE will select no competitors to be winners and will award no prize money.

DOE may conduct a risk review, using government resources, of the competitor and project personnel for potential risks of foreign interference. The outcomes of the risk review may result in the submission being eliminated from the prize competition. This risk review, and potential elimination, can occur at any time during the prize competition. An elimination based on a risk review is not appealable.

A.13 National Environmental Policy Act Compliance
This prize is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq.). NEPA requires federal agencies to integrate environmental values into their decision-making processes by considering the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions. For additional background on NEPA, see DOE’s NEPA website at http://nepa.energy.gov/.

While NEPA compliance is a federal agency responsibility and the ultimate decisions remain with the federal agency, all participants in the ACT 1 Prize will be required to assist in the timely and effective Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

completion of the NEPA process in the manner most pertinent to their participation in the prize competition. Participants may be asked to provide DOE with information on fabrication and testing of their device such that DOE can conduct a meaningful evaluation of the potential environmental impacts.

A.14 Return of Funds
As a condition of receiving a prize, competitors agree that if the prize was made based on fraudulent or inaccurate information provided by the competitor to DOE, DOE has the right to demand that any prize funds or the value of other non-cash prizes be returned to the government.

ALL DECISIONS BY DOE ARE FINAL AND BINDING IN ALL MATTERS RELATED TO THE PRIZE.

Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: ACT-1-Official-Prize-Rules (4.3(a)--Advanced Cybersecurity Technology 1 Prize Program)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5401, 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit for the Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Award Bid Group I (115kV circuit switchers and support structures) and exercise the City’s purchase option for Bid Group II (Spare parts: seismic analysis item 1 and seismic analysis item 2) to Southern States, LLC for an evaluated price of $563,429.38; (2) Authorize an additional project amount of $141,000 (25 percent of the Contract amount) for additional materials to complete the project and project contingency; (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve project construction change orders up to and not to exceed the total project budget; and
(4) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 18th Amendment to City Budget Resolution 2023-060 appropriating $204,500 for increased costs of materials and supplies for the Substation Circuit Switchers capital project.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council approved $500,000 for replacing the aging Substation Circuit Switchers in Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Fiscal Year 2024-25 Biennial Budget. However, due to increased costs of materials and supplies, staff estimates the updated total project cost to be approximately $704,500 (including an additional $141,000 for project completion and project contingency). REU has adequate reserves to fund the additional cost of $204,500 for this capital project.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to award the bid to Southern States, LLC, and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 258
Report to Redding City Council November 1, 2023
Re: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit Page 2 Background/Analysis
REU’s system has five “line-backer” style circuit switchers that have been in service for over 30 years. This style circuit switcher is outdated and no longer manufactured. Spare parts are increasingly difficult to find, introducing the risk of being unable to repair failures. Failure of a circuit switcher would significantly affect system reliability, and the current lead time on this equipment is 56 weeks.

Staff separated Bid Schedule No. 5401 into two separate groups: (1) Bid Group I - 115kV circuit switchers and support structures, and (2) Bid Group II – Spare parts. On September 14, 2023, staff opened one bid proposal. Based on bid proposals and experience with the company, staff recommends awarding Bid Group I and exercising the City’s purchase option of Bid Group II’s seismic analysis item 1 and item 2 to Southern States, LLC. Due to the custom foundations of the circuit switchers ordered, seismic analysis and design are necessary to ensure the equipment complies with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standards.

The original bid request included the Moore Road substation in the scope, but after additional field review, REU staff discovered there was no need to replace the equipment due to it being a newer model with available market support.

Environmental Review
On June 20, 2023, the City Council determined the REU Substation Facility Maintenance Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401
Previous Staff Report 6-20-2023
Packet Pg. 259
Resolution No. 2023 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 18 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $204,500 FOR THE REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY SUBSTATION CIRCUIT SWITCHER RETROFIT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
211 8091 REU - Capital $204,500
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
211-8091-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 204,500
Increase Expenditures
211-8091-7500002-00000 Equipment - Equipment $ 204,500
Total $ 204,500 $ 204,500
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $204,500 for the Redding Electric Utility substation circuit switcher retrofit project for fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the ______day of __________, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Bid Proposal
- 1 -
BID

FOR FURNISHING
FIVE (5) 115KV CIRCUIT SWITCHERS WITH

CUSTOM SUPPORT STRUCTURES TO FIT EXISTING FOUNDATION
(Schedule Number 5401)
To: City of Redding
Michelle Kempley, Purchasing Officer
Date The undersigned agrees to furnish for the City of Redding, California, (Corporate Name of Bidder)
at the prices quoted below, in accordance with the Circuit Switcher Retrofit Information Statement (CSRIS), the Specifications, and General Conditions on file in the office of the Purchasing Division of the City of Redding, copies of which are attached hereto and are hereby made a part of this proposal:

BID GROUP I
Item Qty Description Unit Price Price
1 5 115kV circuit switcher and support structure to match existing foundation anchor patterns per attached
Specifications.
$ $
2 1 115kV circuit switcher and support structure to match existing foundation anchor patterns with an integrated
disconnect switch per attached Specifications.
$ $
Sales Tax for items 1 & 2 @ 7.25% $
3 3 Service Engineer to instruct REU personnel in the field assembly and gassing of the first installed unit. Price shall include Field Service Engineer to be onsite for up to three days inclusive of travel and per diems. See
Technical Specifications section 2.7.

$ ______ $
Total Cost of Bid Group I $
10-12-23
Southern States, LLC
95,750.00 478,750.00
34,709.38
13,970.00 13,970.00
527,429.38
Alternate #2 10-12-2023

N/A N/A
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Bid Proposal
- 2 -
BID GROUP II - Spare Parts
Item
4 Qty
1 Description
Single pole SF6 interrupter unit
Price
$
5 1 Motor $
6 1 lot Contactor and auxiliary relay of each type furnished $ 7 1 Trip coil $
8 1 Anti-pump relay $
9 1 Time delay relay $
10 - recommended spare parts
Seismic Analysis Item 1
$
$ Subtotal Bid Group II (Items 4 - 10)
Sales Tax @ 7.25%
Net Cost Delivered Bid Group II
$
$
$
TOTAL NET COST DELIVERED BID GROUPS I & II $
All prices quoted herein are firm, and are not subject to change. An hourly rate for Field Service Engineer is unacceptable. The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive minor irregularities.

For items one and two, the total will equal the unit price times the quantity listed on the bid form. The total bid group price will be the total of each item comprising the bid group. Bid Group II Spare Parts items are optional and will not be used to determine evaluated totals for award.

The Bidder hereby acknowledges that he has received Addenda Nos. , , to these Specifications. (Bidder insert No. of each Addendum received.) Failure to acknowledge receipt of addenda, if any were issued, may cause bid to be considered non-responsive. Bidder may check the to confirm the addenda, if any, which have been sent. www.CityofRedding.org/PurchasingBids It is understood that this bid shall remain open and shall not be withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) calendar days from the date prescribed for the opening of this bid.

It is further agreed that the materials to be furnished under this proposal will be delivered per the delivery schedule outlined in the bid documents. f.o.b. Redding Power Substation, 17120 Clear Creek Road Redding, CA 96001.

Supplier shall bear all freight charges from plant to destinations, including U. S. Customs, if applicable.

N/A
P/N: 08240386 7,865.00
P/N: 01470095 667.00
P/N: 01491048 140.00
1,245.00/lot
P/N: 01491133 440.00
P/N: 01491066 280.00
48,387.00
771.18
49,158.18
576,587.56
Freight - Bid Group II Items - No Sales Taxes 1,750.00
18,000.00
Seismic Analysis Item 2 18,000.00
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Bid Proposal
- 3 -
Respectfully submitted,
Mailing Address Corporate Name of Manufacturer
City, State, Zip Signature
/ Telephone/Fax Print Name and Title ______________________________ Email Address Jason Cunningham
30 Georgia Ave. Southern States, LLC
Hampton, GA 30228
678-773-9036
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) CSRIS
-1-

CIRCUIT SWITCHER RETROFIT INFORMATION STATEMENT (CSRIS) Important: The following information and data sheets must be submitted with the circuit switcher bid.

Failure to include this information may result in the bid being considered non-responsive.

The Proposal for the equipment and/or material specified in the attached Specification shall contain the following specific information as a minimum and shall be supplied in the following manner. All proposal drawings and information furnished shall be in English. Dimensions shall be in U. S. Standard Measure.

If desired, or where additional space is required by the Bidder, references may be given on the CSRIS indicating specifically where in the Proposal, the required information may be found.

A. GENERAL

1. Any and all exceptions to this Specifications and General Conditions must be listed individually and accompany the proposal. If there are no exceptions the words "No Exceptions" must be written below.

2. Attach information, including pricing, on any alternate construction or revision(s) being proposed by the Manufacturer, if any.

3. Number of years of experience making circuit switchers similar to the one required in this Specification.

4. Attach information describing the availability of spare parts, service, and engineering support within the United States. Assurance of long-term commitment to product support must be provided. Specify how quickly spare parts and field support can be provided under emergencies. Spare parts must be available within 24 hours.

5. Description and location of service shop and personnel under direct ownership and control of the Manufacturer which is the closest to the City of Redding and which will be available for service work on the equipment if requested by the Owner. The description shall also state the length of time this service shop has been in operation.

6. Location where the circuit switcher will be assembled and factory tested.

7. Attach proof that the Manufacturer has furnished at least ten circuit switchers of similar design to that in this specification which have been in successful operation within the United States for at least two years.

See document: "SFO72930 R4 - REU -Bid 5401 - CSV 123kV-40kA-2000A 10-2-23" 20 years
Hampton, GA (USA)
Hampton, GA (USA)
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) CSRIS
-2-
B. TECHNICAL DATA - Submit all of the following with your bid:

1. Attach a complete description of general design, including dimensions and weights, rating data, drawings, catalog information of equipment and/or material being proposed, description of interrupter construction and materials, description of operating mechanism.

2. Attach a separate outline drawing for each location as described in Technical Specification Section 2.4 showing detail that proposed circuit switcher will correctly align with existing foundation piers and anchor studs. Each outline drawing shall be labeled according to destination as detailed in Section 2.4 of the Technical Specifications.

3. Attach reference data of operating and inrush currents for the motor operator, trip coil, and heaters.

4. Attach a description of any special tools or equipment that are necessary for the installation or maintenance of the circuit switcher. One set of special tools or equipment shall be provided and shall be included in the lump sum price.

5. List recommended but not required special tools and prices (to be purchased at the City's option). Also, describe the interchangeability of spare parts listed under Bid Group III with previous circuit switcher models supplied to the City of Redding.

6. Attach a verification statement of circuit switcher and support structure withstand capability seismic ratings in accordance with IEEE 693 high.

C. WARRANTY INFORMATION

1. Description of warranty on the circuit switcher, spare parts, and accessories.

D. TESTS

1. List specific factory tests to be performed on the equipment.

Previously supplied job order 605477 / dwg 83050168 / PO 109220 Special Tools: N/A
See attached warranty terms.

IEEE Standard C37.016 testing will be conducted.

Southern States Standard CSV Warranty of 66 months after shipment or 60 months from installation applies
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Contents of the Contract Documents
-1-

2. List specific tests recommended by the Manufacturer to be made in the field at the time of energization.

E. SHIPPING

1. Describe the proposed manner of shipment (type of truck, packaging, and unloading method).

2. State whether the circuit switcher pole assemblies will be shipped assembled or partially assembled. Describe extent of field assembly required.

N/A
Flat bed truck
Interrupters and support structures will need to be installed on the base frame.

Southern States agrees to ship Qty 2 CSVs by quoted Lead Time. We will then ship Qty 2 CSVs every two/three weeks following the first shipment thereafter until order is fulfilled.

Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) 30 Georgia Avenue • Hampton, GA 30228
Phone 770-946-4562 • Fax 770-946-8106
www.southernstatesllc.com
Date: 10/16/2023
Attn: Clinton Torrence
City of Redding Electric Utility
Proposal Number: SFO72930-R5
Project Name: Bid 5401 - CSV 123kV-40kA-2000A Proposal
Southern States is pleased to provide the following proposal per your request. • Drawings can be submitted approximately 8-10 weeks after receipt of order. • Estimated shipment is 56-58 weeks after receipt of order. • Prices are FOB Hampton, GA Freight Prepaid and Added to Invoice . • Our proposal is valid till 11/10/2023.
• Payment terms are Net 30 Days after receipt of invoice. • The proposed equipment is covered by Southern States Limited Warranty. • The equipment listed in this proposal is subject to the Southern States standard terms and conditions, https://www.southernstatesllc.com/ssllc-terms-andconditions-of-sale.

Note: Pricing does not include applicable sales tax unless specifically itemized in the proposal. If a current tax exemption certificate has not been provided, the applicable sales tax will be added to the invoice.

Your consideration of Southern States equipment is much appreciated. We trust you will find our bid favorable and look forward to working with you on this requirement.

Sincerely,
Darin Jensen
Area Sales Manager - PSD West
Office: (770) 946-4562 , Ext:10235
Mobile: (801) 499-3410
Email: [email protected]
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Pricing Summary
Proposal Number: SFO72930-R5 Pricing Date: 10/6/2023
Project Name/RFQ #: Bid 5401 - CSV 123kV40kA-2000A Proposal Expiration Date: 11/10/2023
Currency: US Dollars
Bid Item: 1.0 CSV Unit Price: $ 100,250.00 Qty: 4.0 Ext. Price: $ 401,000.00 Customer Item:

Ships with positive pressure of SF6
Porcelain Interrupters
125 VDC Control Voltage
-40 C to +50 C
50 kA 3 sec / 130 kA Peak Withstand Rating
Dual Trip Coil
123 kV Rated Maximum Voltage
Circuit Breakers
3 Cycle Interrupt Time
Local - Remote Selector Switch
Trip - Neutral - Close Switch
Manual Charging Handle
Manual Trip Close Levers
Door Actuated Cabinet Light
Mechanical Open-Close Position Indicator
Spring Charged-Discharged Indicator
Spring Charge Fail Alarm
Trip Circuit Monitoring Relay
Independent Trip Coil Circuit
Duplex Receptacle with GFCI
Position Indicating Lights
SF6 Gas (25 lb) and Fill Kit
Chase and Lubricated Galvanized Nuts (Structure)
CA Department of Industrial Relations Certificate
Column Spacing = 9' - 0" (CL/CL)
Separate Control Cabinet
Upper Terminal Height at 20ft
125 VDC Motor Voltage
550 kV BIL
120 VAC Thermostat Controlled Heater(s)
2000 A Continuous Current Rating
12 x 12 Anchor Bolt Layout
120 VAC Utility Voltage (1-Phase)
2 Column Structure
Customer Specified Low Voltage Protection
145 kV / 138 kV (Max Design / Nominal Voltage)
40 kA Primary Bus Fault Interrupting Rating
102" Phase Spacing
FOB Redding, CA - Freight Prepaid and Allowed
Independent Gas System
Third Party Seismic Analysis
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit)

Bid Item: 3.0 CSV Unit Price: $ 113,750.00 Qty: 1.0 Ext. Price: $ 113,750.00 Customer Item:

Ships with positive pressure of SF6
Porcelain Interrupters
125 VDC Control Voltage
-40 C to +50 C
50 kA 3 sec / 130 kA Peak Withstand Rating
Dual Trip Coil
123 kV Rated Maximum Voltage
Circuit Breakers
3 Cycle Interrupt Time
Local - Remote Selector Switch
Trip - Neutral - Close Switch
Manual Charging Handle
Manual Trip Close Levers
Door Actuated Cabinet Light
Mechanical Open-Close Position Indicator
Spring Charged-Discharged Indicator
Spring Charge Fail Alarm
Trip Circuit Monitoring Relay
Independent Trip Coil Circuit
Duplex Receptacle with GFCI
Position Indicating Lights
SF6 Gas (25 lb) and Fill Kit
Chase and Lubricated Galvanized Nuts (Structure)
CA Department of Industrial Relations Certificate
Column Spacing = 13' - 4" (CL/CL)
Separate Control Cabinet
Upper Terminal Height at 20ft
125 VDC Motor Voltage
550 kV BIL
120 VAC Thermostat Controlled Heater(s)
2000 A Continuous Current Rating
11 x 11 Anchor Bolt Layout
120 VAC Utility Voltage (1-Phase)
2 Column Structure
Customer Specified Low Voltage Protection
FOB Redding, CA - Freight Prepaid and Allowed
145 kV / 138 kV (Max Design / Nominal Voltage)
102" Phase Spacing
40 kA Primary Bus Fault Interrupting Rating
Independent Gas System
Third Party Seismic Analysis

Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Proposal Number: SFO72930-2-1 TOTAL: $ 514,750.00
Comments & Clarifications:

Section 1.10 - Southern States agrees to REU T&C's except LD's are not accepted.

Section 2.3.1 - Interrupters and support insulators will be porcelain.

Section 2.3.4.5 - Cabinet heaters are not forced air type.

Section 2.3.4.8 - Control cabinet height will vary based on column heights.

Section 2.4 - All phase spacing will be 102" (CL/CL).

Section 2.4.9.4 - Due to various column width and heights, in order for IEEE 693 seismic rating to apply, an independent seismic study must be performed.
• Approval Drawings must be accepted by City of Redding prior to the seismic study being performed by the independent 3rd party.

Section 2.4.12 - Indenting type marking will not be provided.

Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Southern States Bid Proposal-Schedule No. 5401 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) GI " Y F

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: June 20, 2023 FROM: Barry Tippin, City Manager ITEM NO. 9. 1( c)
APPROVED BY***
btippin@cityofredding. org
ry ippin, Ci an 6lIS"2023
btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 9. 1( c)-- Consider Resol ution adopting and approving the City of Redding Biennial Bud et 2023- 25
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions:
1) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the City of Redding Biennial Budget for Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2024 and June 30, 2025.
2) Find that the general maintenance activities performed by various City departments on City facilities/ equipment over the course of iscal years 2023- 2024 and 2024- 2025 are categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The Biennial Budget 2023- 2025 ( Budget) is the expenditure plan for the City of Redding ( City).

Approving the budget will provide the opportunity for City staff to perform the duties and pursue the strategies as outlined in the document and as directed by the City Council ( Council). The proposed budget for the first year is $ 397, 489, 150 and$ 423, 277, 400 for the second year.

Alter native Action
The Council could choose to not approve the budget, adjust the budget, adjust the budget through future Council action after approving the budget, and/ or direct staff to bring back the budget for re- consideration at a future special meeting
Background/ Analysis
The City operates on a budget approved by the Council in J une of each odd numbered year. The budget is developed over the span of several months. Each department establishes neeessary staffing and funding required to achieve its core functions including that which would be reguired to complete additional efforts as direeted by the CounciL This budget refleets the information pr sented and discussed at three budget workshops conducted in February, April, Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-20-2023 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Report to Redding City Council June 20, 2023
Re: 9. 1( c)-- Consider Resolution adopting and approving City of Redding Biennial BudgetPage 2 and May 2023. The workshops provided the Council with an opportunity to provide direction relative to the budget development process. Within the budget document ( and copied below) is the City Manager Budget Message.

As Council reviews the attached proposed budget document it is important to note this document will look dif erent than the fmal published document. The final published document will be completed with the assistance of the Communications Team and be enhanced and optimized for online viewing and usage.

City Mana er Bud et Messa e
Introduction
The City of Redding ( City) Biennial budget for Fiscal Year 2023- 24 and Fiscal Year 2024- 25 is focused on maintaining the gains the City has made over the past four years. Over the past four years, the economy was better than expected and through fiscal discipline and a focus on priority goals and objectives, the City made great strides in many areas, incl uding the following:
a) Increased Fire Department staffing to include three fire personnel on every fire apparatus for the first time in City history, working towards a four-person per fire apparatus on three separate engines, utilizing grant funding.
b) Increased Police staffing across the board with 122 budgeted sworn officers allowing for the re- establishment of Beat No. 8, the creation of two Crisis Intervention Response Teams ( with two officers per team), adopting and staffing a Park Ranger program with four Park Rangers, and the addition of a bike team. This provides far more resources to police our city not only responding to calls for service but increasing the time available for proactive policing.
c) Provided market- based salary and benefit packages to several employee groups and continuing the progress in this area.
d) Investment in technology upgrades including a new Enterprise Resource Planning platform with accessory modules, vetting, implementing and installing a new City- wide phone system, new facility access control system, new radios for public- safety groups, and a new computer aided dispatch system.
e) Invested in infrastructure ranging from painting City Ha11, to the Caldwell Park Skate Park along with large investments in utility equipment replacement, upgrade and modernization.

Review and updating of City policies and procedures such as the travel policy, alternative work schedules, hybrid/ remote work policy and the program review of the City' s workforce management system and methods.
g) Continuation of the downtown revitalization with the completion of the high-profile Block 7 project and the implementation ofthe Downtown Parking System. h) Completion of the updated Downtown Specific Plan, in-process of the General Plan update, and launching the Redding Riverfront Speci c Plan update.

Maintaining these gains while developing this budget and grappling with a slowing economy required grit, creativity, and a willingness to push against some norms associated with typical budget development. City Council insight was necessary to develop the budget and was provided at three workshops with the City Council providing solid direction on various topics resulting in the proposed budget. With this guidance the proposed budget maintains all advancements the City has achieved and provides some additional areas of growth. The path Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-20-2023 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Report to Redding City Council June 20, 2023
Re: 9. 1( c)-- Consider Resolution adopting and approving City of Redding Biennial BudgetPage 3 forward is treacherous and will require continual vigilance and perhaps swift action to maintain the solid financial footing that has always been the City' s strength.

Revenue
The City of Redding sales tax revenue for Fiscal Year 2022 — 2023 is estimated to be below projections by over $ 2 million with total General Fund tax revenues estimated to be below projections by $1. 7 million. This budget " loss" combined with the corresponding impact to the City' s 10- year plan has been the largest obstacle in the creation of this budget. To put this in perspective, a $ 1. 7 million loss is equivalent to eight lnid- level police officer positions. The $ 2 million loss in sales tax represents a reduction of approximately 6 percent in that single funding source. Future revenue has also proven very difficult to project given the uncertain economy with high inflation, low unemployment and increasing interest rates. Many economists are predicting a recession while others disagree with this thought. Based on the uncertainty, staff recommended that the City Council approve modest increases in the major General Fund tax categories. These revenue forecasts are as follows: Sales tax slightly above a 2. 5 percent increase in FY 2024 and slightly above 2. 5 percent in FY 2025; Property tax with a slight increase above 3 percent in FY 2024 and above 3 percent in FY 2025; Transient Occupancy tax above 4 percent in FY 2024 and above 4 percent in FY 2025; Cannabis tax and other taxes with an increase of just over 4 percent in FY 2024 and above 4 percent in FY 2025.

ARPA Funding
The City of Redding was provided $ 18. 6 million in funds from the American Rescue Plan Act ARPA) to be utilized in the flexible manner as established in the United States Treasury Fina1 Rule. The City Council provided initial direction in fund spending in February 2022, prior to the downturn in the economy. With the downturn and the noted loss of General Fund Revenues the City Council has redirected a portion of this funding to assist in maintaining the newly established public services that have been put into place. More particularly, this funding will be used to pay for officers assigned to Beat No. 8 and the Park Rangers through the Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 and will be used to augment the Police and Fire Departments rolling stock budgets by 1 million each. Additionally, $750, 000 wi11 be used to maintain/ replace General Fund facilities.

While it is not normally prudent to cover personnel expenses by " one- time funding" it is recommended to do so in order to maintain services while providing an opportunity to observe the health of the economy utilizing this additional rime to make other adjustments in the budget and 10- year plan to maintain the minimum 10 percent reserve.

Regulatory Pressure and Modern Requirements
The regulatory nature of California is in full swing and the development of this budget takes this into account. Ranging from transportation electrification to wildfire protection to organic diversion, the pace is fast and furious. Equally challenging is the threat created by cyber attacks and technology obsolescence. The proposed budget accounts for these, both in the short term and long term.

Cyber security threats continue to grow and the cost of defending against them grows as well.

The Information Technology Department ( IT) takes the lead in combating this threat. Over the past f w years, signi cant progress has been made by changes to process, staff augmentation and technology investment, adding a Cyber Security Officer, increased security for passwords, and deploying a dual authentication program. This budget continues this trend in an effort to balance Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-20-2023 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Report to Redding City Council June 20, 2023
Re: 9. 1( c)-- Consider Resolution adopting and approving City of Redding Biennial BudgetPage 4 fiscal prudence and continue to reduce risk. Similar improvements wi11 take place in the next two years as well as increased physical security in the form of security cameras and facility access control. Consequently, the IT budget has expanded to account for these necessary actions yet even with this increase, we still remain short of truly ineeting the need, due to funding constraints.

Public works is another department significantly impacted during this budget cycle, from a regulatory perspective, with all utilities having pressure to comply. Iowever, the Solid Waste and Storm Drain Divisions are the hardest hit and the respective Division budget requests reflect this. The Storm Drain Utility is facing ever increasing restrictions on pollutants entering the water way creating a need for large investment in infrastructure and personnel. The Solid Waste Division is impacted by the recently required Organics Diversion Program as we11 as City growth. Both ofthese issues are more fully explained in the Public Works overview.

Lastly, while the substantive requirements ofthe mandates of electrifying the City' s fleet will not occur during this budget cycle, continuing to prepare and plan for this eventuality is prudent.

Staff continues to support statewide efforts to put some common sense into this discussion and has initiated a fleet development study along with the continued enhancement of the electric grid to handle the future load created by the conversion from fossil fuels to " clean" power.

Unfunded Needs and Other Challenges
As with previous budgets, the City of Redding struggles to obtain the funding necessary to maintain its infrastructure. With the City being more than 60 square miles, and a low population density, the traditional funding schemes employed in California generally fall short of providing adequate funding. The City relies heavily on grant revenue to construct improvements such as bike lanes, housing, and parks, but these expenses generally fall to General Fund tax revenues to maintain this infrastructure. The same General Fund tax revenues also must provide for general government services such as Public Safety. This, coupled with recent inflationary pressures, inventory shortages, insurance increases and the cost of employee benefits, makes balancing this budget a challenge.

Pension
The cost of employee pensions continues to impact the available resources to provide City services. These pension costs come in two forms; one is the annual cost and the other is the unfunded liability expense. While the former has increased due to a change in assumptions by the California Public Employees' Retirement System ( Ca1PERS) the latter is a key cause of budget difficulties. Due to changes in 2017 by CaIPERS, the unfunded liability cost skyrocketed.

The unfunded pension liability cost to the General Fund in this budget is $ 13. 6 and $ 14. 6 million in FY 2024 and FY 2025 respectively. The Budget Summary section contains much more detail related to the pension costs for the City
Workforce
There has been good success in stabilizing and growing the City' s workforce over the past two years but it remains imperative that the City continues to focus on recruiting, retaining, training and supporting employees. With the completion of the personnel process report, the implementation of the new Enterprise Resource Planning program and human capital Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-20-2023 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit) Report to Redding City Council June 20, 2023
Re: 9. 1( c)-- Consider Resolution adopting and approving City of Redding Biennial BudgetPage 5 management software, there wi11 be ample opportunities to modernize the tools and protocols which should enhance employee satisfaction.

The City' s workforce is aging with a high percentage of staff at, or nearing, retirement age, particularly at the Director level. Therefore, focus on succession planning will remain a high priority. Additional funding has been added to departments for training and efforts are being focused on preparing staff for future opportunities. Some ofthese opportunities will be driven by the ever-increasing regulatory environment in which we work. New regulation usually requires new expenses often in the form of staffing. By focusing on training and succession planning, the City will be better able to continue to offer quality services to the City' s residents.

EnviNonmental Review
Staff has reviewed the budget and the associated general maintenance activities of various departments and determined that the general maintenance activities are Categorically Exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities and equipment. City facilities/ equipment will undergo general maintenance activities throughout the course of the 2023/ 24 and 2024/ 25 fiscal years; however, the maintenance activities will result in negligible or no expansion of use. The proposed activities and action areas have been reviewed for sensitive resources and will not have a significant effect on biological or cultural resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The maintenance activities have no potential to have a signi cant effect on the environment.

Council Pr iority/ City Manager Goals
Budget and Financial Management — " Achieve balanced and stable 10- year Financial Plans for all funds."
Public Safety — "Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding." Communication and Transparency — "Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust."
Government of the 21st Century — `Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today' s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today."
Economic Development — " Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the eommunity."
Attachments
Proposed Reso - WIP 6- 12- 23
Proposed Biennial Budget FY 23- 24 & 24- 25
CEQA Exemption Budget 23- 25
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-20-2023 (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5401 - 115kV Circuit Switcher Retrofit)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve setting a Public Hearing on December 5, 2023, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider increases in Redding Electric Utility (REU) rates (four percent revenue increase per year) effective with the January 2024 and January 2025 billing cycles, and an increase in the benefit of REU’s Residential Energy Discount for income-qualified households.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with setting the public hearing.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to set the public hearing as proposed and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
REU increased rates in 2022 and 2023 by two percent per year to offset inflationary pressures and comply with federal and state regulatory requirements. Aging infrastructure replacement, rising power supply costs, further inflationary pressures, and funding REU’s Senate Bill 901 Wildfire Mitigation Plan drive the need for rate increases. REU has mitigated cost increases as much as possible, limiting controllable operations and maintenance costs to a less than three percent annual growth rate despite record-breaking inflation.

REU’s current biennial budget, adopted by the Council on June 20, 2023, included a five-year financial plan. The financial plan included a four percent revenue increase every year through 2027 and a two percent increase in 2028. Only the four percent rate increases for the years 2024 and 2025 are being proposed at this time.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(b)--Consider setting a Public Hearing for December 5, 2023 regarding Redding Electric Utility rate increases.

Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 276
Report to Redding City Council October 31, 2023
Re: 4.5(b)--Set a Public Hearing for December 5, 2023 regarding REU rate increases Page 2 The effect of the proposed changes on each customer’s utility bill will depend on several factors, including how much electricity is used each month. On average, standard residential customers will see an increase of about $6.75 per month starting in 2024 and an additional $7.75 per month in 2025. In addition, staff will recommend increasing the Residential Energy Discount (Public Benefits Program) for all Residential and Residential Multi-Family customers, mitigating a portion of the rate increase for income-qualified customers.

Commercial customers will experience varying impacts due to differences in their energy usage and business size. The City of Redding (City) will provide tables and calculators to the public before the public hearing. These tools will be accessible on the City's website and at public workshops. They will display estimated changes in bills for different types of customers.

Customers can also enter their own energy usage to see how these changes may affect them.

Staff projections show that REU would remain the lowest electric provider in the area, with average standard residential bills for REU, Shasta Lake, and PG&E at $160, $166, and $341, respectively (2025 projected rates).

A panel of five community members representing a cross-section of REU’s customer makeup participated in a three-part meeting series to discuss the foundations of not-for-profit public power, evaluate REU’s cost of service, and review the proposed rate plan. The consensus of the panel was that the proposed rate increases are appropriate, fair, and equitable.

Additional public workshops will be held prior to the public hearing, both in-person and webbased, to ensure inclusion, and information will be provided directly to community-based organizations.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 277

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions related to Bid Schedule No. 5410, Furnishing and Delivering Four, One-Ton Trucks:
(1) Award bid to Crown Motors; and
(2) Authorize the purchase of four, one-ton trucks with a utility body at a net delivered cost of $305,815.05 to replace three older trucks in the City of Redding Parks Division and one in the City of Redding Building Maintenance Division.

Fiscal Impact
The cost of the replacement vehicles proposed is included in the approved rolling stock budgets for Fiscal Year 2023-24 for both the Parks and Building Maintenance Divisions. The cost of the four vehicles purchased from Crown Motors is $305,815.05. There are sufficient rolling stock funds in both the Parks and Building Maintenance Divisions' budgets to cover the purchase of the vehicles.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to authorize the purchase and provide alternate direction to the staff. This action may result in increased downtime and maintenance costs.

Background/Analysis
The Parks Division team maintains landscaping for over 100 City of Redding (City) owned sites, including parks, buildings, and office campus landscaping, street medians, and special facilities throughout the City. The Parks Division deploys staff and the necessary equipment and tools to job sites for maintenance service duties, including mowing, irrigation and plumbing, tree care, weed and pest control, erosion control, vandalism clean-up, playground inspection, and other activities. These job duties require a range of vehicles, trailers, equipment, and tools. Building Maintenance staff is responsible for inspecting, and maintaining 701,000 square feet of Cityowned buildings in various locations.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Award Bid Schedule 5410 to Purchase Ford F-350 Pickup Trucks with Utility Beds
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 278
Report to Redding City Council November 1, 2023
Re: 4.6(a)--Award Bid Schedule 5410 Page 2
These truck replacements in both divisions were closely evaluated and recommended by the Fleet Division before being included in the City's adopted budget. The average Parks Division vehicle is 16 years old, and the Building Maintenance average vehicle is 11 years old.

Considering these vehicles' age, mileage, and service history, they are beyond the normal replacement schedules. Regular vehicle replacements should occur based on their expected lifecycle costs and considering the cumulative costs of repairs and maintenance.

Bid opportunity notices were distributed to potential vendors, in addition to posting the bid on the City's website and advertising in the Record Searchlight. Three bids were received. The apparent low bid was received from Lithia Chevrolet, but it was incomplete and therefore disqualified. Staff reached out to the company on multiple occasions and received no response.

Towne Ford was the second low bid, with local vendor Crown Motors' bid within five percent of Towne Ford's bid. In accordance with the Redding Municipal Code Section 4.20.180, Crown Motors agreed to match Towne Ford's bid of $71,245 (unit price without tax) per truck. The quote includes four 2024 Ford F350, regular cab chassis XL, gasoline engine, two-wheel drive trucks with a Scelzi Service Body.

Approving the purchase of these vehicles will provide the staff with the equipment they need to perform their duties efficiently and effectively, ensuring safe and clean public spaces.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000, et seq.) Section 15378 and is therefore exempt from CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – "Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today's residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today."
• Budget and Financial Management – "Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds."
Attachments
Crown Motors Quote
Redding Municipal Code_4.20.180
Packet Pg. 279
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Crown Motors Quote (4.6(a)--Award Bid Schedule 5410) Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Crown Motors Quote (4.6(a)--Award Bid Schedule 5410) Created: 2023-04-17 17:42:40 [EST]
(Supp. No. 42)