Redding City Council
November 21, 2023

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA
November 21, 2023
6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MICHAEL DACQUISTO
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Pastor Joshua Thompson, Westside Church of Redding C. Roll Call

2. PRESENTATIONS
2A. Mayor’s presentation of an Appreciation Clock to Kelsi Halvarson for her service on the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee from October 4, 2016, to November 30, 2023.
2B. Consider award of an Appreciation Clock and Resolution to City of Redding Public Works Director Chuck Aukland in honor of his retirement from public service.

Recommendation:

Award City of Redding Clock of Appreciation; and adopt Resolution honoring Charles (Chuck) Aukland for his distinguished service as the City of Redding’s Director of Public Works.
2C. Consider award of an Appreciation Clock and Resolution to City of Redding Community Services Director Kimberly Niemer in honor of her retirement from public service.

Recommendation:

Award City of Redding Clock of Appreciation; and adopt Resolution honoring Kimberly A. Niemer for her distinguished service as the City of Redding’s Director of Community Services.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.gov or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council November 21, 2023

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation. 4(a). Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – Closed Session of November 7, 2023; and Special Meeting – Closed Session of November 10, 2023.
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register Nos. 4; and Payroll Register Nos. 8 and 9.

4.5(a). Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Services for Area 1, (as shown in the map attached to the staff report), to bidder Arbor Pros LLC, California, for $565,000, plus a 20 percent contingency of $113,000, for the period beginning the date the City of Redding (“City”) issues the purchase order and ending on April 15, 2024; and (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 22nd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating an additional $328,000 for electric line clearance and emergency operations services.

4.11(a). Authorize the following actions related to the Downtown to Turtle Bay Gap Completion Project that will run along Sundial Bridge Drive from the intersection of Butte Street, north to the Sacramento River:
(1) Accept State Transportation Improvement Program funds; and (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 20th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

Redding City Council November 21, 2023

4.11(b). Authorize and approve the Agreement for Sale of Conservation Credits from Riparian Ranch, LLC in an amount not to exceed $297,500, to offset long-term impacts on salmonids and designated critical habitat for the Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project.

4.11(c). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5408 (Job No. 2688), Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Facultative Sludge Lagoon and Sludge Drying Bed Project:
(1) Reject the apparent low bid by T & S Construction Co., Inc. as nonresponsive and award the project to the second low bidder SnL Group, Inc., in the amount of $7,660,744.83;
(2) Approve an additional $780,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $228,074 for project development costs; (3) Approve $760,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(5) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, Section 15302 – Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Facilities.

4.11(d). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5379, Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project:
(1) Award to S.T. Rhoades Inc., in the amount of $6,493,039.98; (2) Approve an additional $1,139,200 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $1,393,664 for project development costs; (3) Approve $649,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 21st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $1,333,270 for the Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening project; decreasing appropriation of federal grant funds by $506,040 and increasing appropriation of Transportation Impact Fee funds by $1,839,310.

4.11(e). Approve the sole source procurement of hardware, software and licenses, which is estimated to cost $98,000, to enhance and upgrade the access control and video management system at the Shasta County Libraries (Redding, Anderson, and Burney) by finding that the name AMAG Symmetry CompleteView Video Management System in the specifications for Public Works projects is authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2) in order to match other products already in use by the City of Redding.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

Redding City Council November 21, 2023

5. APPOINTMENTS

5.1. Consider Mayor's appointments and reappointments to the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee.

Recommendation:

Approve Mayor’s recommendation to make the following appointments and reappointments to the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee:
(1) Appoint John Carelli to fill an unscheduled vacancy with a term ending November 30, 2025;
(2) Appoint Nicole Dues to fill a scheduled vacancy with a term ending November 30, 2026;
(3) Reappoint Blake Fisher to serve a full-term ending November 30, 2026; and (4) Reappoint Roxanne Burke to serve a full-term ending November 30, 2026.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Assistant City Manager

9.2(a). Consider appropriation of Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) 3-L Award.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City of Redding (City) Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $8,354,960 of Encampment Resolution Funding Lookback Disbursement Round 3 ERF 3-L funds and adding a full-time, Housing Specialist I/II position to the City’s Housing Division;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Development Funding Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission for maintenance improvements in an amount not to exceed $500,000;
(3) Direct staff to prepare a request for proposals for eligible scope of work items as identified on the Grant Expenditure Summary which includes housing case managers; interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase; and day resource center director and case manager; and prioritize the release of each request for proposal; and
(4) Determine that allocating grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Redding City Council November 21, 2023

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: https://www.shastaartscouncil.org/scactv. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the Services tab, and select City Council Videos.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Presentation of City of Redding Appreciation Clock to Kelsi Halvarson for her service on the Community Development Advisory Committee from October 4, 2016, to November 30, 2023.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2A--Presentation of City of Redding Appreciation Clock to Kelsi Halvarson.

Redding City Council
Packet Pg. 6

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Award City of Redding Clock of Appreciation; and adopt Resolution honoring Charles (Chuck) Aukland for his distinguished service as the City of Redding’s Director of Public Works.

Attachments
^Resolution
MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 2B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2B--Consider Resolution and presentation of appreciation clock honoring Charles (Chuck) Aukland for distinguished service as the City of Redding's Director of Public Works.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-_____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

COMMENDING CHARLES (CHUCK) AUKLAND FOR OUTSTANDING

DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF REDDING
WHEREAS, Chuck Aukland began his career with the City of Redding on November 29, 2004, and has served as Project Coordinator, Assistant City Engineer, Assistant Director of Public Works, and Director of Public Works; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Aukland has effectively and expertly managed the direction, organization, and operation of the Airports Division, Engineering Division (Design, Construction, Environmental Management, Survey and Traffic Operations), Streets Division, Utilities – Water (Collection/Distribution/Treatment), Wastewater(Collection/Compliance/Industrial Waste Treatment), Storm Drain Utility, Utility Specialists/USA Locates, Solid Waste-Collection/Customer Service/Transfer Station West Central Landfill and the Fleet Divisions, and served as the Executive Officer for the Redding Area Bus Authority; and WHEREAS, during his tenure with the City of Redding, Mr. Aukland was instrumental in leading a number of projects and programs for the City of Redding, such as:
• Downtown-to-Diestelhorst Bike Trail
• South Bonnyview Road Widening
• South Bonnyview Road/Bechelli Lane Roundabout
• Costco Relocation
• Positive Partnership with the Redding Development Community • Solid Waste Diversion Program including the Pyrolysis Pilot Project • Secured millions of dollars in state and federal grants • Infrastructure Master Plans and Asset Management
• Redding Regional Airport Air Service Enhancements
• Redding Regional Airport and Benton Airpark Capital Improvements • Downtown Parking System
• Downtown Redevelopment
• Rebuilding after the 2018 Carr Fire
• Rebuilding after the 2019 Snowmageddon Event
• Expert Program Management of more than $25 million in Capital Construction Projects WHEREAS, in addition to his busy schedule, Mr. Aukland has also demonstrated outstanding community leadership in the following areas:
• Grant School District Board of Trustees
• United States Air Force – Lt. Colonel, ret.
• Youth Sports Coach
WHEREAS, in recognition of his exemplary leadership skills, and in the performance of his duties and responsibilities, Director Aukland has always served the City of Redding with pride, professionalism, and distinction while providing a high level of integrity and a focus on the community and its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby expresses its deep appreciation to Director Chuck Aukland for his dedication, enthusiasm, and the countless and long-lasting contributions he has made to Shasta County, the City of Redding, and its citizens, and wishes him future success and happiness as he retires from public service.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of November, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members - Audette, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Dacquisto NOES: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED TO FORM:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: ^Resolution (2B--Resolution honoring Charles Aukland for his service to the City of Redding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Award City of Redding Clock of Appreciation; and adopt Resolution honoring Kimberly A.

Niemer for her distinguished service as the City of Redding’s Director of Community Services.

Attachments
^Resolution
MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 2C
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2C--Consider Resolution and presentation of appreciation clock honoring Kimberly A. Niemer for distinguished service as the City of Redding's Director of Community Services.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

COMMENDING KIMBERLY NIEMER FOR OUTSTANDING DEDICATED

SERVICE TO THE CITY OF REDDING
WHEREAS, Kimberly Niemer began her career with the City of Redding on November 4, 1996, and has served as Personnel Analyst, Management Assistant to the City Manager, and Director of Community Services; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Niemer has effectively and expertly managed the direction, organization, and operation of the Buildings and Facilities Maintenance Division, Communications Division, Parks Maintenance Division, Shasta Public Libraries, Redding Tourism, Redding Convention Center, Recreation Division, the Redding Aquatic Center, Martin Luther King Center; and
WHEREAS, during her tenure with the City of Redding, Ms. Niemer was instrumental in leading a number of projects and programs for the City of Redding, such as:
• Martin Luther King Jr. Center
• Turtle Bay East, Nur Pon and Kum Bay
Xerel Open Space Areas
• Community Creek Clean-up
• Numerous Parks and Trails Projects
• Fantasy Fountain at Kids Kingdom
• Kids Kingdom II
• South City Park Activation Plan
• City of Redding Communications Team • Highland Park
• Art in Public Places Program • Salt Creek Heights Park • Sculpture Park at City Hall • Park Host Housing
• Big League Dreams • Grant Awards for Panorama Park
• Aquatic Center • Farmers Market Rebranding and Sponsorship • Sundial Bridge Opening and 10-Year
Celebration
• Opening of the new Burney Library
• Shasta Public Library Citizens Advisory
Commission
• Youth Scholarship Fund
• Redding Skate Park • Bureaucracy Buster initiative
• The Park at Carnegie Park • Lean-In-Circle for City of Redding staff WHEREAS, in addition to her busy schedule, Ms. Niemer has also demonstrated outstanding community leadership in the following areas:
• Northern Valley Catholic Social Service Board of Directors • University Preparatory School Board
• Founding Member of the Healthy Shasta Board and President • Manzanita School Site Council
• Association of American University Women Board of Directors WHEREAS, in performance of her duties and responsibilities, Ms. Niemer has always served the City of Redding with pride, professionalism, and distinction while providing a high level of integrity and a focus on the community and its citizens; and in recognition of her exemplary leadership skills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby expresses its deep appreciation to Kimberly Niemer for her dedication, enthusiasm, and the countless and longlasting contributions she has made to Shasta County, the City of Redding, and its citizens, and wishes her future success and happiness as she retires from public service.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of November, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members -
NOES: Council Members -
ABSENT: Council Members -
ABSTAIN: Council Members -

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED TO FORM:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Resolution (2C--Resolution honoring Kimberly Niemer for her service to the City of Redding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – Closed Session of November 7, 2023; and Special Meeting – Closed Session of November 10, 2023.

Attachments
^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of November 7, 2023 ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of November 10, 2023 MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 11
291
11/07/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
November 7, 2023, 5:15 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Barry E. DeWalt, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:15 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 6:11 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Baker, et al. v. City of Redding, et al.; Shasta County Superior Court Case No. 192661 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3B. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of Litigation
One potential case
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3C. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Property Location: Stillwater Business Park, Lots 14 and 15; Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 054-260-006 and 054-260-007
Agency Negotiator: City Manager Tippin
Negotiating Parties: City of Redding and Fabric Workshop, Inc.

Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3D. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Personnel Director Kibler Employee Organizations:
(1) Redding Police Managers’ Association; and
(2) Unrepresented Employees
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of November 7, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 292
11/07/2023

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 6:12 p.m., Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of November 7, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 297
11/10/2023
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Caldwell Park Conference Room
777 Cypress Avenue, Second Floor
Redding, CA 96001
November 10, 2023, 9:00 AM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Michael Dacquisto with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, and City Attorney Barry E. DeWalt.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 9:00 a.m., Mayor Dacquisto opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 10:40 a.m., Mayor Dacquisto reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957(b):

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
City Attorney
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 10:41 a.m., Mayor Dacquisto declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting Closed Session of November 10, 2023 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register Nos. 4; and Payroll Register Nos. 8 and 9.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:

Accounts Payable:
(1) Register No. 4 for the period October 1, 2023 – October 31, 2023, in the amount of $25,641,653.81.

Payroll:
(1) Register No. 8 for the period October 1, 2023 – October 14, 2023, in the amount of $4,730,100.64 and Register No. 9 for the period October 15, 2023 – October 28, 2023, in the amount of $4,575,699.15.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.

Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 15
Report to Redding City Council November 9, 2023
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 Packet Pg. 16
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 4 and Payroll Register Nos. 8 & 9 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Services for Area 1, (as shown in the map attached to the staff report), to bidder Arbor Pros LLC, California, for $565,000, plus a 20 percent contingency of $113,000, for the period beginning the date the City of Redding (“City”) issues the purchase order and ending on April 15, 2024; and (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 22nd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating an additional $328,000 for electric line clearance and emergency operations services.

Fiscal Impact
The total project cost, including contingency, is listed below:

Description Estimated
Cost
Electric Line Clearance and Emergency Operations
Services
$565,000
20% Contingency $113,000
TOTAL $678,000
The Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Fiscal Year 2024-25 Biennial Budget approved by the City Council (Council) on June 20, 2023, included appropriations for electric line clearance services for $350,000. REU has adequate reserves to fund the additional $328,000 necessary for this service.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service for Area 1
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 69
Report to Redding City Council November 13, 2023
Re: 4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to award and reject the bid. This alternative means that REU would have difficulty providing necessary clearance to electric lines and would, therefore, not be following the accepted industry practices. This would reduce REU’s ability to provide safe, reliable electric service and meet state and federal regulations.

Background/Analysis
Tree trimming is REU’s most cost-effective and proven preventive maintenance program in providing reliable service. Line clearances are mandated by state and federal regulations and help ensure public safety from potential fires.

Since 1995, REU has contracted for supplemental tree trimming services to assist in reducing a portion of the tree trimming backlog in areas where rapid tree growth occurs. This has allowed REU to maintain a smaller staff to cover a larger area while providing emergency and ondemand clearance work.

On October 26, 2023, two bids were opened for the subject electric line clearance services. The apparent evaluated low bid was received from Arbor Pros, LLC, with a total evaluated price of $565,000. REU has evaluated the proposal from Arbor Pros, LLC, and found it to be a responsible bid that complies with the requirements of the specification and general conditions.

The 20 percent contingency is for emergency operations in the event of a winter storm or fire for quicker restoration of power to REU customers while the contractors are under contract with REU.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Bid Tabulation
^Vicinity Map
Packet Pg. 70
Resolution No. 2023 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 22ND AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $328,000 FOR ELECTRIC LINE CLEARANCE AND EMERGENCY OPERATION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
211 8041 REU – Vegetation Management $328,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
211-8041-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 328,000
Increase Expenditures
211-8041-8593141-00000
Distribution Maintenance
Overhead Contract $ 328,000
Total $ 328,000 $ 328,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $328,000 for electric line clearance and emergency operations services for fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the ______day of __________, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service)

CITY OF REDDING

PURCHASING DIVISION - TABULATION OF BIDS
BID: ELECTRIC LINE CLEARANCE SVCS
BID SCHEDULE NO. DATE OF OPENING
5413 Thursday, October 26, 2023

CALHOUN TIME OF OPENING
ZETTEL 3:00 P.M.
$565,000.00 $686,200.00
$300.00 $273.00
$400.00 $409.50
$400.00 $546.00
$450.00 $372.25
$550.00 $558.38
$550.00 $744.50
$300.00 $213.00
$400.00 $319.50
$450.00 $426.00
Yes Yes
2-man Flagging Crew (Straight Time Rate)
2-man Crew (Time and a Half Rate)
2-man Crew (Double Time Rate)
Area No. 1
Bid Bond Received
3-man Crew (Straight Time Rate)
3-man Crew (Time and a Half Rate)
3-man Crew (Double Time Rate)
2-man Flagging Crew (Double Time Rate)
2-man Flagging Crew (Time and a Half Rate)

DESCRIPTION

ADDITIONAL LINE CLEARANCE SERVICES
2-man Crew (Straight Time Rate)
Silver Top Tree
Service, Inc Arbor Pros LLC
M. Kempley, Purchasing Division Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: ^Vicinity Map (4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service) Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: ^Vicinity Map (4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service) Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: ^Vicinity Map (4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service) Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: ^Vicinity Map (4.5(a)--Approve Budget Resolution and Award Bid Schedule No. 5413, Electric Line Clearance Service)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions related to the Downtown to Turtle Bay Gap Completion Project that will run along Sundial Bridge Drive from the intersection of Butte Street, north to the Sacramento River:
(1) Accept State Transportation Improvement Program funds; and (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 20th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost of the Turtle Bay to Downtown (TB2DT) Gap Completion Project is $4,035,000. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds in the amount of $1,170,000 and Active Transportation Program (ATP) funds in the amount of $2,665,000 were previously accepted and budgeted for this project. The attached budget resolution will appropriate an additional $100,000 in STIP funding. The remaining $100,000 needed for the project will come from Streets Maintenance funds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the STIP funds or approve the budget resolution. The City of Redding (City) would lose the STIP funds in the amount of $100,000 and the project may not be completed.

Background/Analysis
On September 26, 2013, Governor Brown signed legislation creating the ATP program in the Department of Transportation. The ATP consolidated several federal and state transportation programs into a single program with a focus to make California a national leader in active transportation. The ATP is administered by the Division of Local Assistance, Office of State Programs. The purpose of the ATP is to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding for Downtown to Turtle Bay Gap Completion Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 77
Report to Redding City Council November 14, 2023
Re: 4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding Page 2 The City adopted an ATP Plan establishing priorities from which to design its active transportation facilities. The goals of the ATP Plan are to develop a safe and comfortable transportation network, encourage walking and bicycling, increase safety of users, and promote a positive and progressive view of active transportation in the community.

A gap in the non-motorized transportation network exists, particularly in linking the east side of town and the Civic Auditorium area to Redding’s downtown core. A connection is needed to bring the Hilltop Shopping area, the Dana to Downtown Trail, the Sacramento River Trail, the Downtown Redding area, and the Sundial Bridge/Turtle Bay area together and create a continuous network for pedestrians and bicyclists. The proposed TB2DT Gap Completion Project will run along Sundial Bridge Drive from the intersection of Butte Street, north to the Sacramento River. It will provide a shared-use path, a raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards to provide separation, lane reductions, raised crosswalks, and shade trees. This project is a priority identified within the ATP Plan and has been the focus of several planning studies to date.

The City applied for but was unsuccessful in receiving ATP funding for the Project in Cycle 4 of the Program. However, as a source of matching funds for the Cycle 4 application, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) programmed and the Council accepted STIP funding in the amount of $1,170,000 for the Project. Both agencies and the California Transportation Commission agreed to move ahead with utilizing the STIP funds to complete environmental and preliminary engineering work in an effort to advance the Project and evaluate alternatives, identify challenges and ultimately develop the foundational design concept. Performing this preliminary work made the application for Cycle 5 funding much more competitive. The strategy ultimately worked and the City was awarded $2,665,000 in ATP funding for the project which was subsequently accepted by Council on September 17, 2019. SRTA has subsequently programmed and the California Transportation Commission approved an additional $100,000 to complete the final design components to prepare the project for the solicitation of construction bids. Appropriating the funding is required for expenditure.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The technical environmental studies are complete and a CEQA compliance document will be presented to Council in the future with a request to award the project.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Allocation Letter
Packet Pg. 78
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 20TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $100,000 IN FEDERAL GRANT FUNDING FOR THE TURTLE BAY TO DOWNTOWN GAP COMPLETION PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
151 1671 Transportation Grant Projects $100,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
151-1671-3608001-00000
Federal Grant Capital -
Public Works $ 100,000
Increase Expenditures
151-1671-7700008-00000 Bike Paths & Lanes $ 100,000
Total $ 100,000 $ 100,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $100,000 in Federal grant funding for the Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion project for the fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of November, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding) Ms. Kristen Reagan
Associate Civil Engineer
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Dear Ms. Reagan:

Your letter dated April 17, 2023 requested a fund allocation from the Regional Improvement Program for the City of Redding Pedestrian and bike path - On Sundial Bridge Drive above and north of SR44, throughout the Turtle Bay Park and connecting to the Sacramento River Trail. This project is programmed in the current State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), as amended.

The State hereby makes the following allocation on June 29, 2023, effective June 29, 2023.

At their June 29, 2023 meeting, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) allocated funding in the amount(s) shown below.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Division of Local Assistance
1120 N STREET
P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1
Sacramento, CA 94274-0001
TTY 711
July 14, 2023
02-SHA-0-RDG
RPSTPL-5068(061)
Adv Id: 0219000109
PPNO:02-2588
Request No: 2
Allocation No. 2021-206 2016 STIP FUND ALLOCATION
01 01
Senate District No.:

Assembly District
Amount
Programmed
Fiscal Year
Programmed
Amount Previously
Allocated
This
Request
ROW $50,000 2024 $0 $50,000
PS&E $100,000 2023 $0 $100,000
Federal Funds
State Funds
$0
$150,000
Total
This allocation makes available $0 of federal funds* and $150,000 of State (or State-only) funds for a total of $150,000.
* A separate request for authorization to proceed (E-76) is required prior to the start of reimbursable work for projects receiving federal funds.

The effective date of allocation serves as the authorization to proceed and establishes the date for the start of reimbursable work for State-only funded projects.
$150,000 $0 $150,000
CTC Ltr. Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: ^Allocation Letter (4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding) Ms. Kristen Reagan
July 14, 2023

RPSTPL-5068(061)
After award of the contract, the Agency has up to 36 months to complete the construction or vehicle purchase contract.

The Commission may grant a one-time extension to each of the deadlines specified above if it finds that an unforseen and extraordinary circumstance beyond the control of the responsible agency has occurred that justifies the extension. Please refer to the Local Assistance website at https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance for additional guidance.

The project's award information should be submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) immediately after award of the construction contract. A copy of the project's award package also needs to be included with the submittal of the Administering Agency's first invoice to the Local Programs Accounting Branch. Please refer to Local Programs Procedures (LPP) LPP 01-06 for guidance regarding the contents of the project award package.

This allocation is not a commitment on the part of the State to make reimbursements until an Administering Agency - State Agreement (Master Agreement), if necessary, and a project specific program supplement are executed between the Agency and the State.

Your attention is directed to the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the current CTC guidelines for detailed instructions and information.

Sincerely,
FELICIA HASLEM , Chief
Office of Project Management Oversight - North
Division of Local Assistance
c: Shasta RTPA
Attachment: CTC Vote Box
For This Allocation:

Funds allocated for project E & P are available for expenditure Not Applicable.

Funds allocated for project PS & E are available for expenditure June 30, 2025.

Funds allocated for project RW are available for expenditure June 30, 2025.

Funds allocated for construction -- Agency has 6 month(s) after the date of allocation to award a contract.

CTC Ltr.
bc: A Wong - LPA
Allocation Letters
DLA AE Project Files
DLA Files -
District - (02) Acting DLAE - Nicole Fortner
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: ^Allocation Letter (4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding) CTC MEETING ACTION TAKEN REPORT / REVISED ESTIMATED TIMED AGENDA June 28-29, 2023 Office of CTC Liaison Page 55 of 92 As of July 10, 2023 Division of Financial Programming
Note: This document was prepared by the Department, following the California Transportation Commission meeting, and is a reflection of the Department's interpretation of actions taken by the Commission Advance – Multi-Funded ATP/STIP Allocation
Tab Item Description Ref# Presenter Status Type* Agency* 143 Request of $150,000 for the locallyadministered multi-funded ATP/STIP Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project,
off the State Highway System, in Shasta
County, programmed in Fiscal Year 2023-24.
(PPNO 2588A and 2588)
Resolution FATP-2223-34
Resolution FP-22-107
(June 2023 CTC Meeting-Day 2 – 03:14:33)

2.5w.(7) Beverley NewmanBurckhard
Dee Lam
Approved. A D
Advance – ATP Allocations
Tab Item Description Ref# Presenter Status Type* Agency* 144 Request of $5,010,000 for seven locallyadministered ATP projects, off the State Highway System, programmed in Fiscal Year
2023-24.

Resolution FATP-2223-33
(June 2023 CTC Meeting-Day 2 – 03:14:33)

2.5w.(2) Beverley NewmanBurckhard
Dee Lam
Approved. A D
145 Request of $233,000 for the locallyadministered ATP SR 49 Gold Rush MultiUse Path Phase 1 project, on the State Highway System, in Tuolumne County,
programmed in Fiscal Year 2023-24.
(PPNO 3569)
Resolution FATP-2223-36
(Revision in the Book Item Attachment for
Project 1.)
(June 2023 CTC Meeting-Day 2 – 03:14:33)

2.5w.(6) Beverley NewmanBurckhard
Dee Lam
Approved. A D
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: ^Allocation Letter (4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding) Amount by
Fund Type
CTC Financial Vote List June 28-29, 2023
Project #
Allocation Amount
Recipient

RTPA/CTC
District-County
Project Title
Location
Project Description
PPNO
Program/Year
Phase
Prgm'd Amount
Project ID
Budget Year
Item #
Fund Type
Program Code

2.5w.(7) Locally-Administered Multi-Funded ATP/STIP Project Off the State Highway System (Advancement FY 2023-24)

2.5 Highway Financial Matters
Resolution FATP-2223-34
Resolution FP-22-107
Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project. The
project is located in the City of Redding, CA on Sundial Bridge Drive above and north of SR44, throughout Turtle Bay Park, and connecting to the Sacramento River Trail. Buffered 2-way cycle track; shared use path; raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards, lane reductions; raised crosswalks with bike/ped separations; and shade trees.

Statewide
Outcome/Outputs:

Installation of 324 feet of buffered 2-way cycle track, 311 feet of buffered Class II bike lane, 1,715 feet of shared use path; raised intersection with bulbout/curb extensions, bollards, lane reductions; 2 crosswalks with bike/pedestrian
separations; landscaping and shade trees to provide safe connections to and through Turtle Bay Park
CEQA - CE, 2/01/2023
PPNO 2588A is the infrastructure component to
PPNO 2588B.

ATP funding for $50,000 for RW under PPNO 2588A
STIP funding for $100,000 for PS&E under PPNO 2588.
02-2588A
ATP/23-24
R/W
$50,000
RIP/22-23
PS&E
$100,000
0219000109
S
2021-22
102-0001 GF $50,000

20.30.720.100
2021-22
101-0042 SHA $100,000

20.30.600.620
$150,000
City of Redding
SRTA
02-Shasta
1

Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: ^Allocation Letter (4.11(a)--Accept State Transportation Improvement Program Funding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the Agreement for Sale of Conservation Credits from Riparian Ranch, LLC in an amount not to exceed $297,500, to offset long-term impacts on salmonids and designated critical habitat for the Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project.

Fiscal Impact
The Sacramento Drive at Olney Creek Bridge replacement project is 100 percent funded by the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP), and the total project cost is estimated to be in the $3 to $4 million range. There is funding within the existing budget to pay for the purchase of the conservation credits.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize the Agreement for Sale of Conservation Credits (Agreement), and provide alternate direction to staff. It may be difficult to purchase salmonid habitat conservation credits at a later date, as the mitigation banks within the approved service area are running out of credits. If credits are not purchased construction approval would not be granted.

Background/Analysis
On February 21, 2012, Council accepted federal funding from HBP for rehabilitation or replacement of ten bridges in various locations throughout the City of Redding (City), and one of those locations was the Sacramento Drive Bridge. Initial preliminary engineering funding of $150,000 was allocated for this location so that staff could prepare a detailed project scope, risk analysis, and cost estimate. This information was used to determine whether it would be prudent for staff to pursue a rehabilitation or replacement of this bridge. From this initial analysis, it was determined that this site required a bridge replacement, and on June 17, 2014, Council accepted an additional $320,000 in HBP funding to complete the project design.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for Purchase of Conservation Credits Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 85
Report to Redding City Council November 13, 2023
Re: 4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits Page 2 Since that time, the technical environmental studies have been completed. As the federal lead agency, and in compliance with Section 7 of the Threatened and Endangered Species Act, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) initiated a formal consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for the project. On March 23, 2022, NMFS issued a Biological Opinion requiring the City to offset long-term impacts on salmonids and designated critical habitat by purchasing 1.7 conservation credits at the Freemont Landing Conservation Bank or other NMFS approved mitigation bank within critical habitat for the species.

In June 2023, the Freemont Landing Conservation Bank contacted staff to let us know that only six credits remain available for purchase. Staff then contacted Caltrans to verify that the purchase of conservation credits prior to the completion of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation, otherwise known as advanced mitigation, is federally reimbursable. Caltrans provided a written response confirming that an advanced mitigation purchase is eligible for reimbursement.

The environmental phase is progressing, as NEPA is anticipated to be complete in December 2023 and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is anticipated to be complete in February 2024. Once CEQA and NEPA are complete, regulatory permits will be obtained and the project can move to the right-of-way and construction phases. The right-of-way appraisal and acquisition phase is anticipated to take twelve months. Advertising the project for bids and construction is anticipated in 2025 depending on the bridge program funding availability.

Given the limited number of mitigation banks and limited credits available within the service area, staff is requesting Council authorize and approve an advanced mitigation Agreement for the purchase of Conservation Credits from Riparian Ranch, LLC., in an amount not to exceed $297,500.

Environmental Review
Authorization and approval of the Agreement is not a project as defined by CEQA or NEPA, and no further action is required at this time. The environmental process for the project will continue forward and staff will return to Council in 2024 to request approval of the CEQA document.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement
Previous Staff Report 2/21/2012
Previous Staff Report 6/17/2014
Packet Pg. 86
1 AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF CONSERVATION CREDITS

FREMONT LANDING CONSERVATION BANK
NMFS File No. WCRO-2021-02995
This Agreement is made and entered into this _______ day of October, 2023 by and between RIPARIAN RANCH, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Bank Owner”) and the CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation (“Project Proponent”) as follows:

RECITALS
A. The Bank Owner has entitlements to the Fremont Landing Conservation Bank (“Bank”) located in Yolo County California; and
B. The Bank has been authorized by the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) to operate as a conservation bank with conservation credits available for sale; and C. Project Proponent is seeking to implement the project described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (“Project”), which would unavoidably and adversely impact habitat thereon, and seeks to compensate for the loss of habitat by purchasing conservation credits from Bank Owner; and
D. Project Proponent has been authorized by NMFS Biological Opinion File No.

WCRO-2021-02995 to purchase 1.25 acres of salmonid or riparian habitat credits for the loss of

0.83 acres of riparian habitat and 0.45 acre of salmonid or shaded riparian aquatic (“SRA”) credits for the permanent loss of aquatic habitat associated with the Project; and E. Project Proponent desires to purchase from Bank Owner and Bank Owner desires to sell to Project Proponent 1.7 acre of conservation credits, comprised of 1.25 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid habitat restoration (non-SRA riparian) conservation credits and 0.45 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid/SRA habitat restoration (SRA) conservation credits at Bank.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Bank Owner hereby agrees to sell to Project Proponent and Project Proponent hereby agrees to purchase from Bank Owner 1.7 acres of conservation credits, comprised of 1.25 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid habitat restoration (non-SRA riparian) conservation credits and 0.45 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid/SRA habitat restoration (SRA) conservation credits (collectively, the “Conservation Credits”) for the purchase price of $297,500.00 (“Purchase Price”), in accordance with the terms hereof. The Purchase Price for the Conservation Credits shall be paid by wire transfer of funds or by check payable to “Riparian Ranch, LLC.” Upon receipt of the Purchase Price, Bank Owner will deliver to Project Proponent an executed Bill of Sale in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “B.”
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) 3 Exhibit “A”

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
TO BE

MITIGATED
The proposed Project is to replace the existing Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek with a new bridge. The purpose of the project is to better convey flood flows and to provide a safe crossing over Olney Creek. The existing three-span, 83-foot-long, 30-foot-wide bridge will be replaced with a two-span, 117.5-foot-long, 48-foot-wide precast, prestressed, concrete, bridge at the same location. The new bridge will include two 12-foot wide lanes, each with a 6-foot wide shoulder and a 5-foot wide sidewalk.

The proposed project includes multiple activities that will impact Olney Creek and its habitat, including bridge demolition/reconstruction, stream widening/bank recontouring, stream bottom excavation, rip-rap installation, and riparian plantings. The proposed project would be completed over two construction seasons starting in summer 2022.

To address permanent loss of riparian and aquatic habitats, the proposed action includes purchase of mitigation bank credits at a 1.5:1 ratio. Caltrans will purchase 1.25-acre credits of salmonid or riparian habitat credits for the loss of 0.83 acres of riparian habitat. Caltrans will purchase 0.45 acres of salmonid or shaded riparian aquatic (SRA) credits for the permanent loss of aquatic habitat.
*****
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) 4 Exhibit “B”

BILL OF SALE
Contract #FRCB-23-___
NMFS File No. WCRO-2021-02995
In consideration of $297,500.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, RIPARIAN RANCH, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Bank Owner”) does hereby bargain, sell and transfer to the CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation (“Project Proponent”), 1.7 acres of conservation credits, comprised of 1.25 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid habitat restoration (non-SRA riparian) conservation credits and 0.45 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid/SRA habitat restoration (SRA) conservation credits for the Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project in the Fremont Landing Conservation Bank in Yolo County California, developed and approved under the authority of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Bank Owner represents and warrants that it has good title to the credits, has good right to sell the same, and that they are free and clear of all claims, liens, or encumbrances.

DATED: ____________________________
RIPARIAN RANCH, LLC, a California limited liability company By: _______________________________
Name: Mark Heintz
Its: Manager

Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) 5 Exhibit “C”

FREMONT LANDING CONSERVATION BANK
CONSERVATION CREDITS: PAYMENT RECEIPT

PARTICIPANT INFORMATION
Name: City of Redding
Address: P.O. Box 496071, Redding, CA 96049-6071
Telephone: (530) 225-4046
Contact: Amber Kelley

PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Description: Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project Agency File Number(s): NMFS File No. WCRO-2021-02995
Habitat Affected:

California Central Valley steelhead, Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon, Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon Credits Purchased:

1.25 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid restoration (non-SRA riparian) and 0.45 riparian floodplain forest/salmonid/SRA restoration (SRA) Payment Amount: $297,500
Project Location: Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek, City of Redding County: Shasta

PAYMENT INFORMATION
Payee: RIPARIAN RANCH, LLC
Payer: CITY OF REDDING
Amount:

Two Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand Five Hundred and No/100ths Dollars ($297,500.00)
Method of Payment: Cash Check# Other
Received By:
(Signature)
Name: Mark Heintz
Title: Manager
Date:
m:\marketing\Agreements\saleFRCB_City of Redding Sacramento Dr over Olney Creek (1.7 Credits) Revised: 10/06/2023
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) ITEM NO. CITY OF REDDING
MEETING DATE February 21, 2012 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 6, 2012
G- I00- 170/P- 050- 460/ C- 070
FROM: Brian Crane, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:. Accept State Environmental Enhancement and
Mitigation Program Grant for the Palisades
Avenue River Trail Connection and Adopt the
Attached Budget Resolution
Recommendation
It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council ( Council) accept the State Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program ( EEMP) grant for the Palisades Avenue River Trail Connection and adopt the attached budget resolution to appropriate $ 32"0, 000 in grant funds and 30, 000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) matching funds, for a project total of$ 350, 000.

Background
At its regular meeting on August 25, 2011, the Council authorized staff to apply for the EEMP grant funds for the Palisades River Trail Connection project. The highly competitive program provides 10 million annually to mitigate the environmental impacts of newly modified or constructed public-transportation facilities. Staff prepared and submitted the necessary application and was informed by California Natural Resources Agency staff that the project was selected for funding recommendation to the California Transportation Commission ( CTC). The CTC will consider the item for funding at its regularly scheduled me~ting on March 28- 29, 2012.

The project will provide for approximately 2, 000 feet of Class I trail connecting the newly constructed Sacramento River Trail east ofthe Sacramento River, up the hillside to the southern end of Palisades Avenue. It will provide a much needed north- south connection to the Dana- toDowntown east- west trail and thereby allow much greater access to jobs, recreational amenities, and schools for area residents. In addition, the new connection will eliminate the need to cross a bridge on Hilltop Drive over Interstate 5. This bridge is very narrow and has limited pedestrian and cycling facilities.

The project is the first of a two- phase plan to provide a trail that overlooks the Sacramento River and the Turtle Bay East Riparian Mitigation Site. This first phase will provide a direct connection from the existing trail to Palisades Avenue. The second phase will provide a loop trail around the bluff and will likely include interpretive signs and other public educational amenities.

This project is being pursued as a partnership with the California Department of Transportation, which will provide right-of-way for a portion of the trail. The Shasta County Regional Transportation Planning Agency has also extended its support of this important regional effort to provide alternative transportation opportunities for the community.

Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 2/21/2012 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) Report to City Council
Re Accept EEMPfor Palisades Avenue River Trail Connection February 6, 2012

Issue
Should the Council accept the EEMP grant funds and appropriate the necessary funds to design and construct the proposed trail connection?
Alternatives; Implication ofAlternatives
Alternatives for the City Council to consider are:

1. Accept the EEMP grant funds and adopt the attached budget resolution appropriating 350, 000 for the Palisades Avenue Sacramento River Trail Connection project. This alternative will appropriate $350, 000 for the project and allow staff to begin the design process. Staffwill return to Council for project award. ( Staff Recommendation)

2. Do not accept the grant funds and provide alternative direction to staff. This alternative will result in the loss of$320, 000 in EEMP grant funds and significantly reduce the chances of the City competing favorably on future EEMP grant submissions. It also will place the project in jeopardy unless another funding source is identified.

Fiscal Impact
Engineering staff estimates a total project cost of $350, 000 will be needed to complete this trail connection. The EEMP grant will provide up to $ 320, 000. Sufficient TDA funds are available for appropriation and are eligible for use on trail systems.

Conclusion
The proposed trail connection will mitigate impacts associated with the State Route 44 transportation project by providing alternative transportation opportunities for recreational and commuter uses.

The proposed grant funds can be leveraged with a minor local investment to provide a safe, efficient connection between the central and northern parts of the City for cyclists and pedestrians.

Attachments
A. Project Exhibit
B. Budget Resolution
CA: amf
Engineering\ StaftReports\Acpt - EEMP - Pal isadesA veRiverTrai lConn-CA -cc. wpd c: Kim Niemer, Community Services
Ken Hadley, Finance and Accounting
Dan Little, Shasta County Regional Transportation Planning Agency John Bulinski, Caltrans District 2
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 2/21/2012 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) AlTACHMENT ~Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 2/21/2012 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) Resolution No. 2012 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 12TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 111 APPROPRIATING 350, 000 FOR THE PALISADES AVENUE- SACRAMENTO RIVER TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011- 12.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2011- 111 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND
111
127

DIVISION
518
377

DESCRIPTION
Streets
Local Transportation

INCREASE
320, 000
30, 000

DECREASE
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE

OF FUNDS
SOURCE

OF FUNDS
Increase Transfers
127- 377- 5- 5001- 01
111- 518- 5- 5003- 01
30,000
30, 000
Increase Revenue
111- 518- 6- 1200- 18
127 - 377 -6- 8100- 01
State Grant Capital Public Work
TDA/Shasta Co SB325
320, 000
30, 000
Increase Expenditures
111- 518- 0- 4775- 02 Palisades Avenue- River Trail Connection 350, 000 350, 000 350, 000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $ 350, 000 for the Palisades Avenue- Sacramento River Trail Connection for fiscal year 2011- 2012.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and read at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the day of , 2012 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

DICK DICKERSON, Mayor
flz
w
E
I:

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk RICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City Attorney r:

Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 2/21/2012 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) ITEM NO.

MEETING DATE

4. 11 ( f)
June 17 2014

APPROVED BY

DEPARTM D CTOR

CIN VIANAGER
Recommendation

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: June 9, 2014
G -100 -170 -825/ B - 130- 070/ S- 070- 100
FROM: Brian Crane, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Accept Federal Highway Bridge Program
Funding for Preliminary Engineering ofthe
Sacramento Drive Bridge at Olney Creek
Replacement Project and Adopt the Budget
Resolution
It is recommended that the City Council (Council) accept federal funding from the Highway Bridge Program ( HBP) for the preliminary engineering phase of the Sacramento Drive Bridge at Olney Creek Replacement Project and adopt the attached budget resolution to appropriate $ 320, 000 in HBP grant funds.

Background
On February 23, 2012, the Council accepted federal funding from HBP for rehabilitation or replacement of ten bridges in various locations throughout the City, and one of those locations was the Sacramento Drive Bridge. Initial preliminary engineering ( PE) funding of $150, 000 was allocated for this location so that staff could prepare a detailed project scope, risk analysis, and cost estimate. This information was used to determine whether it would be prudent for staff to pursue a rehabilitation or replacement of this bridge. From this initial analysis, it was determined that this site required a bridge replacement.

Staff prepared a Request for Proposal ( RFP) in November 2013 to hire a consultant that would provide project management, preliminary and final design, environmental compliance, right- of-way coordination, and technical assistance during bidding and construction services for the Sacramento Drive Bridge Replacement Project. In April 2014, staff went to the Council to award the RFP and authorize negotiation and execution ofa consulting and professional services contract for this bridge.

Staff then prepared and submitted the necessary documentation to the HBP to receive additional PE funds to cover staff and other design efforts.

Issue
Should Council accept Federal Highway Bridge Program funding for the preliminary engineering phase ofthe Sacramento Drive Bridge at Olney Creek Replacement Project and adopt the attached budget resolution appropriating an additional $ 320, 000? a
Packet Packet Pg. 96 Pg. 133
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6/17/2014 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) Report to City Council June 9, 2014
Re Accept HBP Funds - Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek Replacement Page 2 Alternatives; Implication ofAlternatives
The Council has the option of selecting one of the following alternatives:

Accept $ 320, 000 in HBP funds and adopt the attached budget resolution appropriating 320, 000 for the PE phase of the Sacramento Drive Bridge at Olney Creek Replacement Project. This will make the additional funds available so that work may continue on this project. ( Staff Recommendation)

2. Do not accept the HBP funds or adopt the budget resolution and provide alternate direction to staff. This will delay the project and risk the loss of $320, 000 in HBP funds. Ultimately, if alternative funding is not secured, the project will not be designed or constructed.

Fiscal Impact
Funding for these services will come from the Federal Highway Bridge Program and will be 100 percent federally funded. The total project cost is estimated in the $ 2. 5 million to 3 million range.

Conclusion
Accepting the HBP funds and adopting the budget resolution will allow staff to continue work on the design of this project, which, when it is completed, will replace an old bridge that has been designated as " structurally deficient" per Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports.

Attachments
A. Budget resolution
B. Location map
CV: amf
Engi neeri ng\StaffReports-BudgetReso-AcptFund- SactoBri dge- C V -CC. wpd c: Chuck Aukland, Public Works Assistant Director
James Triantafyllou, Project Coordinator
Corri Vandiver, Associate Civil Engineer
Packet Packet Pg. 97 Pg. 134
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6/17/2014 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) Resolution No. 2014-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 26TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2013- 061
APPROPRIATING $ 320, 000 FOR THE SACRAMENTO DRIVE AT OLNEY CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013- 14.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2013- 061 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
128 566 Transportation Grant Projects $ 320, 000 a
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE
a
OF OF

FUNDS FUNDS Y
Increase Revenue
L
U
128- 566- 6- 2650- 18 Federal Grant Capital Public Work $ 320, 000 0 0 Increase Expenditures
T o

1. 28- 566- 0- 4908- 05 Sac -Olney Bridge Replacement Project $ 320,000 320, 000 $ 320, 000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $ 320, 000 to begin preliminary design work on the 4-
0 Sacramento Drive at Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project for fiscal year 2013- 14.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and read at a regular CL
meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the day of , 2014 a and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote: N AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: r
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
c
a
E
RICK BOSETTI, MayorCU
a
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk RICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City Attorney Packet Packet Pg. 98 Pg. 135
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6/17/2014 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits) L

SACRA E O DR
Q
i
IJ Co4

HEMLO CK ST

LOCATIONS I O

SACRAMENTO DRIVE BRIDGE PROJECT

LOCATION NO
n- 4
ATTACHMENT— B
Its A -4i. & U- N-4 0Il ow

CITY OF REDDING

ILIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
u
Packet Packet Pg. 99 Pg. 136
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6/17/2014 (4.11(b)--Authorize Agreement for the Purchase of Conservation Credits)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5408 (Job No. 2688), Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Facultative Sludge Lagoon and Sludge Drying Bed Project:
(1) Reject the apparent low bid by T & S Construction Co., Inc. as nonresponsive and award the project to the second low bidder SnL Group, Inc., in the amount of $7,660,744.83; (2) Approve an additional $780,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $228,074 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $760,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and (5) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, Section 15302 – Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) Facultative Sludge Lagoon and Sludge Drying Bed (Project) is being funded by the Wastewater Utility Fund. Sufficient funding for the project is available in the 2023-24 Wastewater Utility budget.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $228,074
Construction Contract + Contingency $8,420,744.83
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $780,000
Additional City Manager Authority $50,000
Total Project Costs $9,478,818.83
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5408 (Job Order No. 2688) Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Facultative Sludge Lagoon and Sludge Drying Bed Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 100
Report to Redding City Council November 14, 2023
Re: 4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5408 SWWTP FSL & SDB Project Page 2 construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to award the bid for the project and provide staff with alternate direction. Without this project, staff would need to pursue other alternatives to managing biosolids disposal at the treatment plant. This may present future regulatory and financial impacts to the Wastewater Utility.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on October 26, 2023, for construction of the project. The low bid in the amount of $7,245,000 was received from T & S Construction Co.

Inc., of Sacramento, California. T & S Construction failed to list all subcontractors per the project bid documents and Public Contract Code (PCC) 4104 in their proposal. Since T & S did not list a subcontractor to complete the coating and painting on the project, they would be required per PCC 4106 to self-perform this work. The City requested T & S to provide details, in writing, regarding their intention to self-perform the work. However, no response was received.

The City Attorney’s office advised and the City Engineer agrees that T & S’s bid is nonresponsive.

The second low bid in the amount of $7,660,744.83 was received from SnL Group, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $7,301,660. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $228,074. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, environmental, consultant services, and permit fees.

The SWWTP project includes the following items of work: construction of two facultative sludge lagoons with LLDPE liners, floating aerators, dredge equipment, and flow splitting facilities; construction of two concrete walled, asphalt lined sludge drying beds with underdrain systems; installation of a 20-foot wet well and package lift station; associated yard piping, site grading, fencing, plant road improvements, drainage systems, and associated electrical and instrumentation improvements.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Sections 15301 - Existing Facilities, Section 15302 – Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of limited numbers of new small facilities and equipment, as well as the reconstruction or conversion of existing structures. The project involves the construction of limited numbers of new sludge facilities and equipment, as well as the reconstruction or conversion of existing facilities and equipment. The project will be constructed within the existing SWWTP facility and will result in negligible expansion of use. The project area has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project area has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Packet Pg. 101
Report to Redding City Council November 14, 2023
Re: 4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5408 SWWTP FSL & SDB Project Page 3 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
^Bid Tabulation
Packet Pg. 102

CHURN CREEK RD DERSCH RD

RIVER VALLEY RD AIRPORT RD

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

EXHIBIT A

STILLWATER WASTEWATER TREATMENT

PLANT FACULATIVE SLUDGE LAGOON

AND SLUDGE DRYING BED PROJECT

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

LOCATION

PROJECT
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5408 SWWTP FSL & SDB Project) Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5408 SWWTP FSL & SDB Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

STILLWATER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FACULTATIVE SLUDGE LAGOON AND SLUDGE DRYING BED PROJECT Bid Schedule No.: 5408
10/26/2023 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,933.00 $5,933.00 2 Implement SWPPP LS 1 $97,525.00 $97,525.00 $69,000.00 $69,000.00 $57,003.31 $57,003.31 3 Trench Sheeting and Shoring LS 1 $99,125.00 $99,125.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $26,990.48 $26,990.48 4 Modification to Existing Digested LS 1 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 $46,000.00 $46,000.00 $20,795.74 $20,795.74 5 Splitter Box Facility Construction LS 1 $291,700.00 $291,700.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $282,172.77 $282,172.77 6 Facultative Sludge Lagoon Facility LS 1 $744,400.00 $744,400.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,381,018.20 $1,381,018.20 7 Paved Sludge Drying Bed Facility LS 1 $1,762,700.00 $1,762,700.00 $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $2,529,992.83 $2,529,992.83 8 FSL and SDB Pump Station Installation LS 1 $462,600.00 $462,600.00 $366,000.00 $366,000.00 $381,526.30 $381,526.30 9 Civil and yard piping work including site LS 1 $2,873,410.00 $2,873,410.00 $1,685,000.00 $1,685,000.00 $1,224,094.07 $1,224,094.07 10 Instrumentation and Electrical LS 1 $923,700.00 $923,700.00 $1,680,000.00 $1,680,000.00 $1,751,218.13 $1,751,218.13 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $7,301,660.00 $7,245,000.00 $7,660,744.83 RTA Construction, Inc Stewart Engineering, Inc AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,608.25 2 Implement SWPPP LS 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $340,400.00 $340,400.00 $127,850.83 3 Trench Sheeting and Shoring LS 1 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $178,000.00 $178,000.00 $82,747.62 4 Modification to Existing Digested LS 1 $154,000.00 $154,000.00 $86,000.00 $86,000.00 $76,698.94 5 Splitter Box Facility Construction LS 1 $385,000.00 $385,000.00 $276,900.00 $276,900.00 $281,018.19 6 Facultative Sludge Lagoon Facility LS 1 $1,250,000.00 $1,250,000.00 $1,130,300.00 $1,130,300.00 $1,240,329.55 7 Paved Sludge Drying Bed Facility LS 1 $3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00 $2,971,500.00 $2,971,500.00 $2,650,373.21 8 FSL and SDB Pump Station Installation LS 1 $295,000.00 $295,000.00 $436,600.00 $436,600.00 $369,781.58 9 Civil and yard piping work including site LS 1 $1,250,000.00 $1,250,000.00 $3,528,900.00 $3,528,900.00 $1,921,998.52 10 Instrumentation and Electrical LS 1 $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $1,974,500.00 $1,974,500.00 $1,851,429.53 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $8,596,500.00 $10,929,100.00 $ 8,607,836.21 ENGINEER'S EST T & S Construction Co Inc SnL Group, Inc

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5379, Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project:
(1) Award to S.T. Rhoades Inc., in the amount of $6,493,039.98; (2) Approve an additional $1,139,200 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $1,393,664 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $649,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and (5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 21st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $1,333,270 for the Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening project; decreasing appropriation of federal grant funds by $506,040 and increasing appropriation of Transportation Impact Fee funds by $1,839,310.

Fiscal Impact
The Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project (Project) is being funded by two sources which consist of the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and the City of Redding (City) Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program. The total estimated cost of the project is $9,724,903.98. To date, the City has received HBP fund authorization in the amount of $6,494,963. Current grant budgeted appropriations total $7,001,000. The attached resolution reduces the amount of grant appropriation by $506,040 to match the amount awarded to date. The total project costs exceed grant funding by $3,229,940.98. A total of $1,390,630 will be funded using previously approved TIF funds. The remaining $1,839,310 in additional TIF funding is requested on the attached resolution.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5379 (Job Order No. 2438) Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 106
Report to Redding City Council November 14, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening ProjectPage 2 Since the bids were higher than the engineer’s estimated cost, staff will be working with California Department of Transportation to obtain additional HBP funding for the project. Staff anticipates the HBP to fully fund its share of the project total costs based upon previous experience with other bridge HBP funded projects. It is anticipated that the HBP will fund 88.53 percent of the project, with a maximum anticipated grant obligation of $8,609,457; the remaining

11.47 percent will be funded using TIF. Until those additional funds become available, the TIF will cover the costs above the estimate. Any additional HBP funds will be presented and budgeted in a separate resolution. The HBP funds being appropriated at this time are currently authorized funds that were not previously budgeted.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $1,393,664
Construction Contract + Contingency $7,142,039.98
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $1,139,200 Additional City Manager Authority $50,000
Total Project Costs $9,724,903.98
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the project is not awarded, the bridge will not be widened, and nonstatndard conditions for pedestrians and motorists will remain. In addition, the City would be at risk of losing federal funds and may have to reimburse project development funds spent to date.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on October 17, 2023, for the project. The low bid in the amount of $6,493,039.98 was received from S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $5,097,520. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $1,393,664. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, consultant services, and permit fees.

This project includes the rehabilitation and widening of the Old Alturas Road bridge over Churn Creek as well as the approach roadway to the bridge. The work will include the removal of portions of the existing bridge, construction of new bridge segments onto both sides of the existing structure, construction of retaining walls, sidewalk, curb and gutter, utility relocation, roadway construction, and other miscellaneous items of work.

It is anticipated that the project will be completed in fall 2025.

Packet Pg. 107
Report to Redding City Council November 14, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening ProjectPage 3 Environmental Review
On December 6, 2016, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-126 approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and approved the project, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Bid Tabulation
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 108
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 21st AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $1,333,270 FOR THE OLD ALTURAS ROAD OVER CHURN

CREEK BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT AND THE ASSOCIATED FUNDING SOURCES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
151
151
1671
1691
Transportation Grant Projects
Construction Tax Capital Projects $1,839,310
$506,040
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
151-1691-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 1,839,310
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
151-1671-3608009-00000 Old Alturas Bridge - Federal Grant Capital $ (506,040) Increase Expenditures
151-1691-7700010-00000 Bridges $ 1,839,310
151-1671-7700010-00000 Bridges $ (506,040)
Total $ 1,333,270 $ 1,333,270
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $1,333,270 for the Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening project and the associated funding sources for fiscal year 2023-24.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of November, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

EDGEWOOD DR

ARROYO MANOR DR

OLD ALTURAS ROAD

CHURN CREEK

CITY OF REDDING EXHIBIT A
Old Alturas Bridge over Churn Crk

LOCATION MAP

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

LOCATION

PROJECT
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening (06C0104) Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438 ENGINEER'S EST S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Construction Surveying and
Staking LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 2 Archaeological Monitor LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 3 Remove Traffic Stripe (Tape) LF 1890 $1.00 $1,890.00 $3.50 $6,615.00 $6.00 $11,340.00 4 Progress Schedule (Critical
Path Method) LS 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 5 Remove Temporary Traffic
Stripe LF 4948 $1.00 $4,948.00 $3.00 $14,844.00 $6.00 $29,688.00 6 Remove Tree EA 14 $425.00 $5,950.00 $866.50 $12,131.00 $1,850.00 $25,900.00 7 Construction Area Signs LS 1 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 8 Type III Baricade EA 3 $125.00 $375.00 $150.00 $450.00 $125.00 $375.00 9 Temporary Traffic Stripe
(Tape) LF 5615 $5.00 $28,075.00 $4.00 $22,460.00 $8.00 $44,920.00 10 Channelizer (Surface Mounted) EA 231 $50.00 $11,550.00 $55.00 $12,705.00 $90.00 $20,790.00 11 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF 1760 $40.00 $70,400.00 $58.00 $102,080.00 $45.00 $79,200.00 12 Temporary Crash Cushion
Module EA 44 $500.00 $22,000.00 $300.00 $13,200.00 $600.00 $26,400.00 13 Job Site Management LS 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 14 Plastic Traffic Drums EA 114 $92.00 $10,488.00 $115.00 $13,110.00 $135.00 $15,390.00 15 Prepare Storm Water Polution
Prevention Plan LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 16 Rain Event Action Plan EA 12 $500.00 $6,000.00 $125.00 $1,500.00 $550.00 $6,600.00 17 Storm Water Sampling and
Analysis Day EA 32 $575.00 $18,400.00 $125.00 $4,000.00 $700.00 $22,400.00 18 Storm Water Annual Report EA 2 $850.00 $1,700.00 $300.00 $600.00 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 19 Temporary Fiber Roll LF 1670 $6.00 $10,020.00 $4.48 $7,481.60 $7.00 $11,690.00 20 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 21 Water Quality Sampling and
Analysis Day EA 12 $775.00 $9,300.00 $250.00 $3,000.00 $550.00 $6,600.00 22 Water Quality Monitoring
Report EA 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 $150.00 $1,500.00 $200.00 $2,000.00 23 Water Quality Annual Report EA 2 $850.00 $1,700.00 $300.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 24 Temporary Creek Diversion
Systems LS 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 25 Asbestos Compliance Plan LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 26 Treated Wood Waste LS 1 $250.00 $250.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 27 Contractor Supplied Biologist LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 28 Remove Marker EA 2 $180.00 $360.00 $50.00 $100.00 $15.00 $30.00 MCM Construction Inc
Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening (06C0104) Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438 ENGINEER'S EST S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL MCM Construction Inc
29 Relocate Roadside Sign (Metal
Post) EA 4 $435.00 $1,740.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 30 Remove Roadside Sign (Strap
& Saddle Bracket Method) EA 1 $100.00 $100.00 $325.00 $325.00 $425.00 $425.00 31 Relocate Roadside Sign EA 1 $1,025.00 $1,025.00 $350.00 $350.00 $375.00 $375.00 32 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete
Pavement (0.40' Max) SQYD 1610 $15.00 $24,150.00 $19.00 $30,590.00 $13.00 $20,930.00 33 Temporary High-Visibility
Fence LF 2187 $10.00 $21,870.00 $3.84 $8,398.08 $8.00 $17,496.00 34 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 35 Roadway Excavation CY 684 $75.00 $51,300.00 $170.00 $116,280.00 $145.00 $99,180.00 36 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 37(F) Structure Excavation (Bridge) CY 156 $250.00 $39,000.00 $260.00 $40,560.00 $800.00 $124,800.00 38(F) Structure Excavation (Type D) CY 160 $600.00 $96,000.00 $350.00 $56,000.00 $1,750.00 $280,000.00 39(F)
Structure Excavation (Retaining
Wall) CY 539 $250.00 $134,750.00 $1,000.00 $539,000.00 $105.00 $56,595.00 40(F) Structure Backfill (Bridge) CY 90 $170.00 $15,300.00 $440.00 $39,600.00 $600.00 $54,000.00 41(F)
Structure Backfill (Retaining
Wall) CY 593 $170.00 $100,810.00 $250.00 $148,250.00 $175.00 $103,775.00 42 Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT 21000 $1.00 $21,000.00 $0.30 $6,300.00 $0.80 $16,800.00 43 Finishing Roadway LS 1 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 44 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 540 $110.00 $59,400.00 $204.00 $110,160.00 $130.00 $70,200.00 45 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 806 $210.00 $169,260.00 $195.00 $157,170.00 $185.00 $149,110.00 46 Tack Coat TON 3 $900.00 $2,700.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 47 Remove Asphalt Concrete
Pavement SQFT 2021 $15.00 $30,315.00 $5.00 $10,105.00 $6.00 $12,126.00 48 30" Cast-In-Drilled-Hole
Concrete Piling LF 693 $620.00 $429,660.00 $500.00 $346,500.00 $800.00 $554,400.00 49(F)
Structural Concrete, Bridge
Footing CY 56 $1,350.00 $75,600.00 $2,000.00 $112,000.00 $1,800.00 $100,800.00 50(F) Structural Concrete, Bridge CY 434 $1,950.00 $846,300.00 $2,150.00 $933,100.00 $3,858.00 $1,674,372.00 51(F)
Structural Concrete, Retaining
Wall CY 182 $1,850.00 $336,700.00 $1,880.00 $342,160.00 $2,270.00 $413,140.00 52(F)
Minor Concrete (Minor
Structure) CY 16 $2,050.00 $32,800.00 $3,400.00 $54,400.00 $4,300.00 $68,800.00 53 Architectural Treatment SQFT 1220 $21.00 $25,620.00 $40.00 $48,800.00 $32.00 $39,040.00 54 Drill and Bond Dowel LF 602 $63.00 $37,926.00 $100.00 $60,200.00 $35.00 $21,070.00 55(F) Bar Reinforcing Steel (Bridge) LB 138341 $2.00 $276,682.00 $2.00 $276,682.00 $2.00 $276,682.00 Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening (06C0104) Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438 ENGINEER'S EST S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL MCM Construction Inc
56(F)
Bar Reinforcing Steel
(Retaining Wall) LB 25370 $4.00 $101,480.00 $2.00 $50,740.00 $2.50 $63,425.00 57(F) Deck Seal SQFT 7668 $4.25 $32,589.00 $5.00 $38,340.00 $6.00 $46,008.00 58 Pedestrian Barricade EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,950.00 $3,900.00 $3,300.00 $6,600.00 59 Rapid Setting Concrete (Patch) CF 4 $400.00 $1,600.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 60 Remove Asphalt Concrete
Surfacing SQFT 3976 $6.00 $23,856.00 $7.00 $27,832.00 $5.00 $19,880.00 61 Prepare Concrete Bridge Deck
Surface SQFT 7668 $4.00 $30,672.00 $3.50 $26,838.00 $5.00 $38,340.00 62 Bridge Removal (Portion) LS 1 $37,000.00 $37,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $115,000.00 $115,000.00 63 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 199 $300.00 $59,700.00 $875.00 $174,125.00 $410.00 $81,590.00 64 36" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 258 $540.00 $139,320.00 $500.00 $129,000.00 $500.00 $129,000.00 65 54" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 8 $750.00 $6,000.00 $1,750.00 $14,000.00 $1,600.00 $12,800.00 66 Remove 12" Waterline and
Valve LF 433 $70.00 $30,310.00 $150.00 $64,950.00 $50.00 $21,650.00 67 12" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe
Waterline and Fittings LF 463 $240.00 $111,120.00 $375.00 $173,625.00 $260.00 $120,380.00 68 12" Butterfly Valve Assembly EA 2 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 69 Force Balanced Expansion
Assembly EA 1 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 70 Combination Air Valve EA 1 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 71 Pressure Test LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 72 Pipeline Disinfection and
Testing LS 1 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 73 Waterline Support Assembly EA 35 $420.00 $14,700.00 $3,100.00 $108,500.00 $3,800.00 $133,000.00 74 Remove Abandoned 4" Steel
Gas Line LF 215 $32.00 $6,880.00 $40.00 $8,600.00 $50.00 $10,750.00 75 36" Precast Concrete Pipe Inlet LF 6 $575.00 $3,450.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $1,600.00 $9,600.00 76 Abandon ACP Waterline EA 1 $840.00 $840.00 $2,870.00 $2,870.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 77 Remove Culvert LF 106 $35.00 $3,710.00 $85.00 $9,010.00 $65.00 $6,890.00 78 Rock Slope Protection (300 LB,
Class IV, Method B) TON 1723 $150.00 $258,450.00 $120.00 $206,760.00 $133.00 $229,159.00 79 Spawning Gravel TON 75 $100.00 $7,500.00 $150.00 $11,250.00 $185.00 $13,875.00 80 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 $1,150.00 $2,300.00 $1,600.00 $3,200.00 81 Minor Concrete (Curb and
Gutter) CY 37 $925.00 $34,225.00 $1,150.00 $42,550.00 $1,200.00 $44,400.00 82 Minor Concrete (Driveway) CY 14 $600.00 $8,400.00 $1,150.00 $16,100.00 $1,400.00 $19,600.00 Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening (06C0104) Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438 ENGINEER'S EST S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL MCM Construction Inc
83 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 22 $1,025.00 $22,550.00 $1,150.00 $25,300.00 $1,300.00 $28,600.00 84 Remove Concrete Curb and
Sidewalk SQYD 34 $80.00 $2,720.00 $110.00 $3,740.00 $275.00 $9,350.00 85 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB 199 $10.00 $1,990.00 $4.00 $796.00 $23.00 $4,577.00 86 Frame and Cover EA 6 $450.00 $2,700.00 $750.00 $4,500.00 $1,700.00 $10,200.00 87 Adjust Water Valve Cover to
Grade EA 1 $600.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 88 Adjust Manhole Frame and
Cover EA 1 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $3,400.00 $3,400.00 89 Relocate Mailbox EA 1 $275.00 $275.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $400.00 $400.00 90 Remove Fence LF 198 $12.00 $2,376.00 $10.00 $1,980.00 $16.00 $3,168.00 91(F) Tubular Handrailing LF 594 $95.00 $56,430.00 $102.50 $60,885.00 $138.00 $81,972.00 92(F)
Concrete Barrier (Type 732SW
Mod) LF 610 $341.00 $208,010.00 $550.00 $335,500.00 $375.00 $228,750.00 93 Remove Guardrail LF 425 $10.00 $4,250.00 $9.00 $3,825.00 $30.00 $12,750.00 94 6" Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 3874 $2.50 $9,685.00 $1.20 $4,648.80 $4.00 $15,496.00 95 8" Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 184 $8.00 $1,472.00 $7.00 $1,288.00 $8.00 $1,472.00 96 Thermoplastic Pavement
Markings SQFT 66 $15.00 $990.00 $16.00 $1,056.00 $35.00 $2,310.00 97 Pavement Marker
(Retroreflective) EA 82 $26.50 $2,173.00 $14.00 $1,148.00 $22.00 $1,804.00 98 Fence (Type WM, Metal Post) LF 153 $30.00 $4,590.00 $28.00 $4,284.00 $30.00 $4,590.00 99 Remove Traffic Stripe LF 2278 $6.00 $13,668.00 $3.75 $8,542.50 $6.00 $13,668.00 100 4" PVC Conduit LF 330 $27.00 $8,910.00 $17.00 $5,610.00 $45.00 $14,850.00 101 6" PVC Condiut LF 330 $30.00 $9,900.00 $23.00 $7,590.00 $55.00 $18,150.00 102 Mobilization LS 1 $400,365.00 $400,365.00 $665,000.00 $665,000.00 $749,000.00 $749,000.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $5,097,520.00 $6,493,039.98 $7,548,093.00 Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening
Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Construction Surveying and
Staking LS 1
2 Archaeological Monitor LS 1
3 Remove Traffic Stripe (Tape) LF 1890
4 Progress Schedule (Critical
Path Method) LS 1
5 Remove Temporary Traffic
Stripe LF 4948
6 Remove Tree EA 14
7 Construction Area Signs LS 1
8 Type III Baricade EA 3
9 Temporary Traffic Stripe
(Tape) LF 5615
10 Channelizer (Surface Mounted) EA 231
11 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF 1760
12 Temporary Crash Cushion
Module EA 44
13 Job Site Management LS 1
14 Plastic Traffic Drums EA 114
15 Prepare Storm Water Polution
Prevention Plan LS 1
16 Rain Event Action Plan EA 12
17 Storm Water Sampling and
Analysis Day EA 32
18 Storm Water Annual Report EA 2
19 Temporary Fiber Roll LF 1670
20 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1
21 Water Quality Sampling and
Analysis Day EA 12
22 Water Quality Monitoring
Report EA 10
23 Water Quality Annual Report EA 2
24 Temporary Creek Diversion
Systems LS 1
25 Asbestos Compliance Plan LS 1
26 Treated Wood Waste LS 1
27 Contractor Supplied Biologist LS 1
28 Remove Marker EA 2

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$25,000.00 $25,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $27,250.00
$135,000.00 $135,000.00 $470,000.00 $470,000.00 $186,250.00 $4.50 $8,505.00 $5.00 $9,450.00 $4.75
$16,000.00 $16,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $16,500.00
$1.00 $4,948.00 $5.00 $24,740.00 $3.75
$1,100.00 $15,400.00 $2,000.00 $28,000.00 $1,454.13
$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,625.00
$170.00 $510.00 $300.00 $900.00 $186.25
$3.00 $16,845.00 $8.00 $44,920.00 $5.75
$98.00 $22,638.00 $100.00 $23,100.00 $85.75
$47.00 $82,720.00 $60.00 $105,600.00 $52.50
$380.00 $16,720.00 $700.00 $30,800.00 $495.00
$175,000.00 $175,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $107,500.00 $52.00 $5,928.00 $100.00 $11,400.00 $100.50
$4,200.00 $4,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
$500.00 $6,000.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $418.75
$482.00 $15,424.00 $700.00 $22,400.00 $501.75
$2,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,525.00
$11.50 $19,205.00 $4.50 $7,515.00 $6.87
$24,000.00 $24,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $13,625.00
$640.00 $7,680.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $485.00
$190.00 $1,900.00 $150.00 $1,500.00 $172.50
$1,600.00 $3,200.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,150.00
$395,000.00 $395,000.00 $570,000.00 $570,000.00 $342,500.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $5,300.00
$3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,625.00
$115,500.00 $115,500.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $111,375.00 $260.00 $520.00 $100.00 $200.00 $106.25
Stewart Engineering Inc Viking Construction Company
Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening
Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
29 Relocate Roadside Sign (Metal
Post) EA 4
30 Remove Roadside Sign (Strap
& Saddle Bracket Method) EA 1
31 Relocate Roadside Sign EA 1
32 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete
Pavement (0.40' Max) SQYD 1610
33 Temporary High-Visibility
Fence LF 2187
34 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1
35 Roadway Excavation CY 684
36 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1
37(F) Structure Excavation (Bridge) CY 156
38(F) Structure Excavation (Type D) CY 160
39(F)
Structure Excavation (Retaining
Wall) CY 539
40(F) Structure Backfill (Bridge) CY 90
41(F)
Structure Backfill (Retaining
Wall) CY 593
42 Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT 21000
43 Finishing Roadway LS 1
44 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 540
45 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 806
46 Tack Coat TON 3
47 Remove Asphalt Concrete
Pavement SQFT 2021
48 30" Cast-In-Drilled-Hole
Concrete Piling LF 693
49(F)
Structural Concrete, Bridge
Footing CY 56
50(F) Structural Concrete, Bridge CY 434
51(F)
Structural Concrete, Retaining
Wall CY 182
52(F)
Minor Concrete (Minor
Structure) CY 16
53 Architectural Treatment SQFT 1220
54 Drill and Bond Dowel LF 602
55(F) Bar Reinforcing Steel (Bridge) LB 138341

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
Stewart Engineering Inc Viking Construction Company
$1,000.00 $4,000.00 $350.00 $1,400.00 $512.50
$130.00 $130.00 $350.00 $350.00 $307.50
$650.00 $650.00 $375.00 $375.00 $437.50
$22.00 $35,420.00 $15.00 $24,150.00 $17.25
$9.00 $19,683.00 $4.00 $8,748.00 $6.21
$75,000.00 $75,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $38,125.00
$98.00 $67,032.00 $150.00 $102,600.00 $140.75
$250.00 $250.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,862.50
$280.00 $43,680.00 $2,000.00 $312,000.00 $835.00
$2,600.00 $416,000.00 $6,000.00 $960,000.00 $2,675.00
$170.00 $91,630.00 $100.00 $53,900.00 $343.75
$400.00 $36,000.00 $950.00 $85,500.00 $597.50
$260.00 $154,180.00 $275.00 $163,075.00 $240.00
$0.40 $8,400.00 $0.30 $6,300.00 $0.45
$8,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,750.00
$191.00 $103,140.00 $130.00 $70,200.00 $163.75
$320.00 $257,920.00 $200.00 $161,200.00 $225.00
$800.00 $2,400.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,075.00
$8.00 $16,168.00 $6.00 $12,126.00 $6.25
$718.00 $497,574.00 $700.00 $485,100.00 $679.50
$2,115.00 $118,440.00 $2,700.00 $151,200.00 $2,153.75
$2,720.00 $1,180,480.00 $3,050.00 $1,323,700.00 $2,944.50 $1,000.00 $182,000.00 $2,400.00 $436,800.00 $1,887.50
$4,700.00 $75,200.00 $5,100.00 $81,600.00 $4,375.00
$35.00 $42,700.00 $25.00 $30,500.00 $33.00
$100.00 $60,200.00 $100.00 $60,200.00 $83.75
$2.30 $318,184.30 $1.75 $242,096.75 $2.01
Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening
Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
56(F)
Bar Reinforcing Steel
(Retaining Wall) LB 25370
57(F) Deck Seal SQFT 7668
58 Pedestrian Barricade EA 2
59 Rapid Setting Concrete (Patch) CF 4
60 Remove Asphalt Concrete
Surfacing SQFT 3976
61 Prepare Concrete Bridge Deck
Surface SQFT 7668
62 Bridge Removal (Portion) LS 1
63 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 199
64 36" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 258
65 54" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 8
66 Remove 12" Waterline and
Valve LF 433
67 12" Class 250 Ductile Iron Pipe
Waterline and Fittings LF 463
68 12" Butterfly Valve Assembly EA 2
69 Force Balanced Expansion
Assembly EA 1
70 Combination Air Valve EA 1
71 Pressure Test LS 1
72 Pipeline Disinfection and
Testing LS 1
73 Waterline Support Assembly EA 35
74 Remove Abandoned 4" Steel
Gas Line LF 215
75 36" Precast Concrete Pipe Inlet LF 6
76 Abandon ACP Waterline EA 1
77 Remove Culvert LF 106
78 Rock Slope Protection (300 LB,
Class IV, Method B) TON 1723
79 Spawning Gravel TON 75
80 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 2
81 Minor Concrete (Curb and
Gutter) CY 37
82 Minor Concrete (Driveway) CY 14

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
Stewart Engineering Inc Viking Construction Company
$2.60 $65,962.00 $2.00 $50,740.00 $2.28
$9.00 $69,012.00 $5.00 $38,340.00 $6.25
$2,350.00 $4,700.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $2,775.00
$940.00 $3,760.00 $1,600.00 $6,400.00 $1,185.00
$9.00 $35,784.00 $5.00 $19,880.00 $6.50
$1.00 $7,668.00 $1.50 $11,502.00 $2.75
$82,000.00 $82,000.00 $211,000.00 $211,000.00 $120,750.00 $368.00 $73,232.00 $450.00 $89,550.00 $525.75
$626.00 $161,508.00 $550.00 $141,900.00 $544.00
$1,730.00 $13,840.00 $1,800.00 $14,400.00 $1,720.00
$62.00 $26,846.00 $50.00 $21,650.00 $78.00
$258.00 $119,454.00 $275.00 $127,325.00 $292.00
$11,000.00 $22,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $9,250.00
$43,000.00 $43,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $32,000.00
$8,300.00 $8,300.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $8,700.00
$15,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,875.00
$4,200.00 $4,200.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $5,175.00
$1,700.00 $59,500.00 $4,000.00 $140,000.00 $3,150.00
$45.00 $9,675.00 $55.00 $11,825.00 $47.50
$2,260.00 $13,560.00 $1,800.00 $10,800.00 $1,540.00
$8,600.00 $8,600.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $6,242.50
$97.00 $10,282.00 $65.00 $6,890.00 $78.00
$166.00 $286,018.00 $130.00 $223,990.00 $137.25
$97.00 $7,275.00 $140.00 $10,500.00 $143.00
$3,660.00 $7,320.00 $7,000.00 $14,000.00 $3,352.50
$1,850.00 $68,450.00 $2,300.00 $85,100.00 $1,625.00
$1,700.00 $23,800.00 $3,050.00 $42,700.00 $1,825.00
Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

BID TABULATION FOR:

Old Alturas Road Over Churn Creek Bridge Widening
Bid Schedule No.: 5379
Job No.: 2438

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
83 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 22
84 Remove Concrete Curb and
Sidewalk SQYD 34
85 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB 199
86 Frame and Cover EA 6
87 Adjust Water Valve Cover to
Grade EA 1
88 Adjust Manhole Frame and
Cover EA 1
89 Relocate Mailbox EA 1
90 Remove Fence LF 198
91(F) Tubular Handrailing LF 594
92(F)
Concrete Barrier (Type 732SW
Mod) LF 610
93 Remove Guardrail LF 425
94 6" Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 3874
95 8" Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 184
96 Thermoplastic Pavement
Markings SQFT 66
97 Pavement Marker
(Retroreflective) EA 82
98 Fence (Type WM, Metal Post) LF 153
99 Remove Traffic Stripe LF 2278
100 4" PVC Conduit LF 330
101 6" PVC Condiut LF 330
102 Mobilization LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance w

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
Stewart Engineering Inc Viking Construction Company
$1,700.00 $37,400.00 $2,900.00 $63,800.00 $1,762.50
$132.00 $4,488.00 $100.00 $3,400.00 $154.25
$6.00 $1,194.00 $25.00 $4,975.00 $14.50
$2,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,800.00 $10,800.00 $1,562.50
$1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,250.00
$1,600.00 $1,600.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,437.50
$800.00 $800.00 $500.00 $500.00 $925.00
$9.00 $1,782.00 $25.00 $4,950.00 $15.00
$145.00 $86,130.00 $120.00 $71,280.00 $126.38
$720.00 $439,200.00 $510.00 $311,100.00 $538.75
$6.00 $2,550.00 $15.00 $6,375.00 $15.00
$1.50 $5,811.00 $4.00 $15,496.00 $2.68
$8.00 $1,472.00 $8.00 $1,472.00 $7.75
$20.00 $1,320.00 $35.00 $2,310.00 $26.50
$18.00 $1,476.00 $25.00 $2,050.00 $19.75
$36.00 $5,508.00 $100.00 $15,300.00 $48.50
$4.00 $9,112.00 $5.00 $11,390.00 $4.69
$26.00 $8,580.00 $50.00 $16,500.00 $34.50
$36.00 $11,880.00 $55.00 $18,150.00 $42.25
$759,000.00 $759,000.00 $943,000.00 $943,000.00 $779,000.00 $7,590,553.30 $9,439,085.75 $7,767,693.01
Shaded areas indicate addition errors.

z

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO REDDING CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2016
ITEM NO. 4. 11( i)
W- 020- 575]
FROM: Brian Crane, Public Works
Director
SUBJECT: 4. 1 l (i) --Adoption of Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek Mitigated Negative Declaration
APPROVED BY***
01 Frian rave, Public
V
orks Dire or 11/ 23/ 2016 Carman 11/ 281201
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approving the Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project as described, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA Guidelines § 15074).

Background
The City of Redding Department of Public Works proposes to rehabilitate the existing four -span, 143 -foot -long by 28 -foot -wide reinforced concrete bridge over Churn Creek on Old Alturas Road. Rehabilitation would include widening the bridge deck, pier walls, and abutments, and widening the roadway on either side of the bridge. Approximately 88 percent of the project is funded by the federal Highway Bridge Program.

The first order of work will be completion of two temporary access roads across the channel for equipment and vehicles. The contractor may also create a temporary access pad beneath the bridge to be used as a road/work platform. The pad and access roads would be made up of clean, uncrushed, rounded river rock with no sharp edges; temporary culverts would divert any stream flows through the site. All temporary work pads and stream crossings would be removed during the winter months as approved by the various resource agencies.

Following completion of the access roads, the existing abutments would be extended to 67 feet.

The existing 1 - foot -wide pier walls would be extended to 66 feet, and ten 50 -foot -long, 30 -inch -diameter piles would be installed to provide support for the pier extensions. Rock slope protection would be placed 21 feet upstream and downstream of the new pier walls and be placed in a 15 -foot -wide zone around the abutments. Upon completion of work around the pier walls and abutments, the bridge deck would be widened. The new concrete bridge deck would measure 67 feet wide and would include a 14 -foot -wide center turn lane and two 12 -foot -wide lanes, each with an 8 -foot -wide shoulder and a 6 -foot -wide sidewalk with a barrier. Pile driving may be required for the placement of falsework piles and for the installation of sheet piles around the pier walls and abutments for dewatering purposes and as temporary retaining walls. The Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Report to Redding City Council November 29, 2016
Re: 4.11( 1) -- Adoption of Old Alturas Road at Churn Creek Bridge Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2
western and eastern approaches to the bridge would require ± 600 and ± 1, 000 feet of road work, respectively; this would include minor widening of the roadway near the bridge to match the width of the new bridge deck. New storm drains and catch basins would be constructed to adequately drain the improved roadway along the north side of both the east and west approach roadways and along the south side of the east approach roadway. In addition, affected driveways would be modified to conform with the new roadway.

Staged construction would be used to build the bridge while maintaining one lane of traffic in each direction; periodic traffic control may be required during critical construction events. An existing 12 -inch -diameter water line and a 4 -inch -diameter gas line would be relocated to the new edge of deck, and electric utilities would be relocated to the edge of the right- of-way. The project will require additional right-of-way to accommodate the new bridge and sewer line.

Temporary construction easements would also be required for construction access and staging.

Construction is planned for summer of 2018, with the goal of completing the project in one construction season. Two construction seasons may be required, however, depending on how early in the season construction begins, construction efficiency, coordination with utilities, and other factors.

An Initial Study ( IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It describes why the Project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed Project could have a significant effect on biological and cultural resources, but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. Mitigation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to biological preconstruction surveys, impact minimization, construction monitoring, exclusionary fencing, erosion control, on- site restoration, and off-site compensation.

Based on the conclusions made in the IS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project.

In addition, a Mitigation and Monitoring Program ( MMP) has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081. 6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.

The IS/ MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies and the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. One comment letter was received from the Department of Fish and Wildlife. A response to the comment letter has been prepared and is attached to the final MND.

The City of Redding is the lead agency for the Project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the City Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section I8.24.070.E and state law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the City Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk' s Office and the Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Report to Redding City Council November 29, 2016
Re: 4.11( 1) -- Adoption of Old Alturas Road at Churn Creek Bridge Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3
State Clearinghouse, completing the environmental review process. The IS/ MND is available in the City Clerk' s office for review.

Issue
Should the City Council adopt the attached resolution relative to the Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project?
Alternatives; Implication ofAlternatives
The City Council has the option of selecting one of the following alternatives:

1. Adopt the attached resolution, thereby adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and approving the Project as described. With this action, the Council will be in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines § 15074). ( Staff Recommendation)

2. Do not adopt the resolution and Mitigated Negative Declaration. Without approval of the environmental document, the project would not proceed forward as a City project.

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the resolution allows the project to move forward towards the construction phase.

There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of adopting the MND and MMP.

Conclusion
Adoption of the MND and approval of the Project are necessary for the project to proceed. The environmental phase must be completed prior to the project moving forward towards construction.

Attachments:

Mitigated Negative Declaration
Resolution
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

PUBLIC WORKS

CITY OF REDDING
777 CYPRESS AVENUE, REDDING, CA 96001
P.O. BOX 496071. REDDING. CA 96049- 6071

ENGINEERING DIVISION
530. 225. 4170 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
530.245.7024
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project State Clearinghouse No.

SUBJECT
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Redding Department of Public Works proposes to rehabilitate the existing four -span, 143 - foot -long by 28 -foot -wide reinforced concrete bridge over Churn Creek on Old Alturas Road.

Rehabilitation would include widening of the bridge deck, pier walls, and abutments, and widening of the roadway on either side of the bridge. As shown in Attachment A, the project area is located in the City of Redding, and is situated in Township 32 North, Range 4 West, Section 32, of the U.S. Geological Survey' s Enterprise 7. 5 -minute quadrangle.

The contractor would need two temporary access roads across the channel for equipment and vehicles, including excavators, loaders, pick-up trucks, etc. The temporary access roads, each approximately 25 feet wide, would be constructed on each side of the bridge and would consist of gravel. The contractor may also create a temporary access pad beneath the bridge to be used as a road/ work platform. The pad and access roads would be made up of clean gravel between 1 and 4 inches in diameter, and would consist of uncrushed, rounded river rock with no sharp edges; temporary culverts would divert any stream flows through the site. All temporary work pads and stream crossings would be removed during the winter months as approved by resources agencies.

Following completion of the access roads, the existing abutments ( located within the ordinary high water mark of Churn Creek) would be extended to 67 feet. The existing 1 - foot -wide pier walls ( also located within the ordinary high water mark of Churn Creek) would be extended to 66 feet, and ten 50 -foot -long, 30 -inch -diameter cast -in drill -holed ( CIDH) piles would be installed to provide support for the pier extensions. Rock would be used to fill scour holes around pier walls ( but would not extend above grade).

Rock slope protection would be placed 21 feet upstream and downstream of the new the pier walls and be placed in a 15 -foot -wide zone around the abutments. Upon completion of work around the pier walls and abutments, the bridge deck would be widened. The new concrete bridge deck would measure 67 feet wide and would include a 14 -foot -wide center turn lane and two 12 -foot -wide lanes, each with an 8 -foot - wide shoulder and a 6. -foot -wide sidewalk with a barrier. Pile driving may be required for the placement of falsework piles and for the installation of sheet piles around the pier walls and abutments for dewatering purposes and as temporary retaining walls. Vibratory and/ or impact hammer pile drivers may be used, depending on the structure being installed and the substrate type. The western and eastern approaches to the bridge would require ± 600 and ± 1, 000 feet of road work, respectively; this would include minor widening of the roadway near the bridge to match the width of the new bridge deck. New Old Alturas Rd and Churn Cr Bridge Rehabilitation Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Page I
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) storm drains and catch basins would be constructed to adequately drain the improved roadway along the north side of both the east and west approach roadways and along the south side of the east approach roadway. In addition, driveways within the ESL would be modified to conform with the new roadway.

Staged construction would be used to build the bridge while maintaining one lane of traffic in each direction; periodic traffic control may be required during critical construction events. An existing 12 - inch -diameter water line and a 4 -inch diameter gas line would be relocated to the new edge of deck, and electric utilities would be relocated to the edge of the right-of-way. The project will require additional right- of-way to accommodate the new bridge and sewer line. Temporary construction easements would also be required for construction access and staging. Up to four construction staging areas could be utilized for the site; no disposal or borrow sites would be needed. Construction is planned for summer of 2018, with the goal of completing the project in one construction season. Two construction seasons may be required, however, depending on how early in the season construction begins, construction efficiency, coordination with utilities, and other factors.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project is located within and surrounded by residential development with commercial businesses located within %2 mile. Old Alturas Road is an important traffic corridor between commercial areas to the west and residential developments near the project and eastward. As such, this segment of road receives high vehicle traffic on a daily basis. The project is situated approximately 550 ft above sea level, and is characterized by hot, dry summers and cool, wet winters. At the nearby airport, the average annual precipitation is approx. 33 inches, with most of the rainfall occurring between October and May.

FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study ( attached), which determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project proposal create the specific mitigation measures identified below. The revised project avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the revised project may have a significant effect on the environment. Ifthere are substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary.

The project includes measures to mitigate potentially significant impacts to biological and cultural resources. Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with CEQA Section 15074. 1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures which it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure is equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it, in itself, would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. i. Based on the whole record ( including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.

Old Alturas Rd and Churn Cr Bridge Rehabilitation Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding.

DOCUMENTATION
The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination.

MITIGATIONMEASURES
B- 1. In -water construction activities, and all pile -driving activities in Churn Creek, will be limited to the period between June 1 and October 31, or as may otherwise be specified through jurisdictional permits and approvals issued by the NMFS, CDFW, ALOE, and/ or RWQCB. If work is proposed outside of the agency -approved work windows, the City will obtain approval from those agencies prior to conducting such work, and implement any additional measures that may be required. In -water pile driving will only be conducted during daytime hours defined as beginning one- half hour after sunrise and ending one- half hour prior to sunset, or as defined by resource agency permits and approvals.

B- 2. Temporary work pads or crossings within the stream will be constructed using clean, washed, rounded gravel, 1- 4 inches in diameter, and will meet the Caltrans gravel cleanliness specification No. 85. Unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, upon completion of the project, all gravel, including any contaminated gravel, will be removed from the creek bottom, except for the last 6 inches of clean, uncontaminated gravel will be left in place to prevent erosion and protect original streambed conditions.

B- 3. All temporary use areas will be restored to preconstruction conditions providing the same or higher density of native woody riparian species, in accordance with the Riparian Restoration Plan - Old Alturas Road Bridge Rehabilitation Project at Churn Creek. Existing woody vegetation will be pruned at ground level prior to work and protected during construction to allow regrowth upon completion of the project.

B- 4. Environmental Sensitive Area ( ESA) fencing will be placed to minimize impacts and prevent unnecessary excursion into protected areas ofthe creek.

B- 5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) will be prepared for the project which will outline Best Management Practices ( BMPs) for erosion control and spill prevention.

Implementation of BMPs will minimize the potential for adverse impacts to fish, water quality, and the aquatic ecosystem.

B- 6. Preconstruction surveys for western pond turtles will be conducted by a qualified biologist immediately prior to the start of in -water work each day that in -water work occurs. Any western pond turtles, or foothill yellow -legged frogs, eggs masses, or tadpoles that are also found, will be relocated to a safe location upstream or downstream ofthe work area.

B- 7. Preconstruction surveys for nesting migratory birds will be conducted if vegetation removal or activities affecting swallow nesting on the existing bridge occurs between March 1 Old Alturas Rd and Churn Cr Bridge Rehabilitation Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) and August 1. A qualified biologist approved by the Engineer will determine if nests are present on the bridge and if work activities are affecting nesting. Surveys will be conducted within 3 days prior to the proposed work. If nesting birds are found, the nest site shall not be disturbed until after the young have fledged. If an active raptor nest is present, no vegetation removal or construction activities will occur within 250 feet of the nest, unless a smaller buffer zone is authorized by the CDFW. Appropriate buffer zones may be established for other nesting birds by a biologist approved by the City. The City may utilize a variety of measures to prevent birds from nesting on the bridge, including the use of bioacoustic deterrents ( e. g., broadcast calls), installation of exclusionary materials ( e. g., Teflon or plastic sheeting or other materials that would not entangle birds) in the winter prior to construction, or removal of partially constructed nests following confirmation by a qualified biologist that no eggs or chicks are present completed nests must not be removed).

B- 8. All required permits and authorizations shall be obtained from state and federal resource agencies prior to any construction activities within Waters of the U.S. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorizations shall be met.

C -l. Environmental Sensitive Areas (ESA) will be established at the project site as delineated in the ESA Action Plan, prepared for and approved by Caltrans who has lead authority over cultural resources pursuant to federal law.

C- 2. A qualified archaeologist and Native American will monitor excavation and initial ground disturbing construction activities in the portion of the APE within 100 ft of known cultural sites, or as defined in the ESA Action Plan. If intact cultural deposits are found, all work shall cease in the area, and the archaeologist shall recommend appropriate conservation measures to be implemented prior to re-initiation ofthe work.

C- 3. In the event archaeological deposits are discovered during project activities anywhere on the project site, all work in the vicinity of the discovery shall be stopped immediately and the resident engineer and archaeologist notified. The archaeologist shall recommend appropriate conservation measures to be implemented prior to re-initiation ofthe work.

C- 4. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all work will stop in the vicinity of the find and the Shasta County Coroner' s Office shall be notified. Treatment of the remains shall be conducted in accordance with the direction of the Coroner and/or the Native American Heritage Commission, as appropriate.

Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to:

State Clearinghouse
Shasta County Clerk
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regional Water Quality Control Board
All property owners along affected streets and within 300 ft Old Alturas Rd and Churn Cr Bridge Rehabilitation Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 4
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

PUBLIC REVIEW
Draft document referred for comments
No comments were received during the public review period.

Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/ completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached.

Comments addressing the findings of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/ or accuracy or completeness of the Initial Study were received during the public review period. The letters and responses follow (see Response to Comments, attached).

Copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Initial Study, documentation materials, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program may be obtained online at http:// www. cilyofredding. ore/ departments/ public- works, and from the Public Works Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact:

Jonathan Oldham, Environmental Compliance Manager, 530- 225- 4046 10- 18- 16
Date of Draft Report
Date of Final Report
Jonathan Oldham
Environmental Compliance Manager
JO: sm
Attachments:

A. Location map
B. Initial Study
C. Mitigation Monitoring Program
D. Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
Old Alturas Rd and Churn Cr Bridge Rehabilitation Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 5
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) SpOTy
R p F
0 yG O
o
s

PROJECT

LOCATION
Opp
A TORAS Rp
pANA pR
v
o cy
o GA
ARROYO
o
Q o
v
Q

MA OR OR
oF Re CITY OF REDDING EXHIBIT A

OLD ALTURAS BRIDGE OVER

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

CHURN CREEK

LOCATION MAP
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

INITIAL STUDY

OLD ALTURAAS ROAD AND CHURN CREEK

BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROJECT
Prepared by:

CITY GP REDDING
Publi;
press
Warks Department
777 ( Avenue
Redding, California 96001
OCTOBER 2016
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

PROJECT INITIAL STUDY

1. Project TitIG_ Old Alturas Ruad and Chuan Crock Bridge Rehabilitation Project

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Redding Public Works Department, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001

3. Contact Put -sun and Phone Number: Jonathan Oldham, Environmental Compliance Manager, ( 53U) 225- 4U46

4. Project Location: On Old Alturas Road between Edgewood Drivc and Victor Avenue, Redding, Shasta County, California.

5. P. iijeut Sponsor' s Name and Address: City of Redding, 777 Cypress, Avenue, Redding, CA. 96UU 1

6. general Plan Designation: Residential: 2 - 3. 5 units per acre Residential: lU - 2U units per acre
Ureenway

7. Zoning= Open Space ( OS)
Milled Residential ( RM -12)
Single Family Residential ( RS -3)

8. Description of Project:

The City of Redding Department of Public Works proposes to rehabilitate the existing four -span, 143 -foot -long by 28 - toot -wide reinforced concrete bridge over Churn Creak or, Old Alturas Road. Rehabilitation would include widening of the bridge deck, pier walls, and abutments, and widening of the roadway on either side of the bridge. As shown irr Attachment A, the project area is located in the city of Redding, and is situated in Township 32 North, Range 4 West, Section 32, of -the U. S. Geological Survey' s Eiacrpribe 7. 5- rrrirrute quadrangle. the contractor would need two temporary access roads across the channel for equiprrreut and vehicles, inuludiug excavators, loaders, pick-up trucks, etc. the temporary access roads, each approximately 25 feet wide, would be constructed on each side ofthe bridge and would consist of gravel. The contractor may also create a temporary access pad beneath the bridge to be used as a roadwork platforrrn. The pad and access roads would be made up of clean gravel between 1 and 4 inches in diameter, and would consist of uncrushed, rounded river rock with no sharp edges, temporary culverts would divert any stream flows through the site. All temporary work pads and stream %aussurgs would be removed during the winter months as approved by resources agencies.

Followirng completion of the access mads, the emoting abutlncrrtni ( located within the ordinary high water mark of Churn Creek) would be emended to 67 feet. The existing 1 - tout -wide pier walls ( also located within the ordinary high water mark of Churn Creek) would be extended to 66 feet, and ten 5u -toot -long, 3U -inch -diameter cast -in drill -holed ( C1DH) piles would be installed to provide support for the pier extensions. Rock would be used to fill scour holes around pier walls ( but would rrut catcnrd above grade). Rock slope protection would be placed 21 feet upstream and downstream of the new the pier walls and be placed in a 15 -foot -wide zour, around the abutments. Upon corrrpletion of work around the pier walls and abutments, the bridge deck would be widened. the new concrete bridge deck would rurwasurO 67 feet wide and would include a 14 -foot -wide center turn lane and two 12 -toot -wide lanes, each with an 8 -toot -wide shoulder and a 6.- tuot- wide sidewalk with a barrier Pile driving may be required for the placement of falsework piles and for the installation of sheet piles around the pier walls and abutments for dewatering purposes and as temporary retaining walls. vibratory and/ or impact hammer pile drivers pray be used, depending ou the structure being installed and the substrate type. The western and eastern approaches to the bridge would require f6UU and ± 1, 000 feet of road work, respectively; this would iucludu minor widening of the roadway near the bridge to match the width of the new bridge deck. New storm drains and catch basins would be constructed to adequately drain the improved roadway along the north side of both the east and west approach roadways and along the south side of the cast approach roadway. In addition, driveways within the ESL would be modified to conform with the new roadway. ( See Attachment B.) utanit- im. a— if uti.— rrojVCt1,,X. 16ruay 2 Packet Pg. 129 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Staged construction would be used to build the bridge while maintaining one lane of traffic in each direction; periodic traffic control may be required during critical construction events. An existing 12 -inch -diameter water line and a 4 -inch diameter gas III= would br, relocated to the crew udgv of dock, acrd uluctric utilitius would be , located to the edge of the right- of-way. The projuct will rvquiry additiunal right- ut- way to accounnud-ate thu uvw bridge acrd svwvr Brio. Tumpurary currstructiurr easements would also be required for construction access and staging. Up to tour construction staging areas could be utilised for the site; no disposal or borrow sites would be needed. construction is planned for summer of 2U18, with the goal of completing the project in one construction season. Iwo construction seasons may be required, however, depending on how early in the season construction begins, construction efficiency, coordination with utilities, and other factors. 9 Surrounding Lana uses and settings: the project is located within and surrounded by residential development with commercial businesses located within '/ z mile. Old Alturas Road is an important traffic corridor between commercial areas to the west and residential developments near the project and eastward. As such, this sugruent of road rccuivvs high vehicle traffic err a daily babib. Thu prujvui ib bituatud appivairriatvly 550 ft above sea lvvvl, and is characterized by hut, dry summers and cool, wet winters. At the nearby airport, the average annual precipitation is approx. jj inches, with most of the rainfall occurring between uctober and May.

IO. Othcr public agenvics whusc appruval is regulrcd (C. g., pCX-mits, financing appruval or participation agreement).

CvntraI VaIIey Regional Water Quality CuntruI Buard
Cdlifornia llepa trent of Fish and Wildlife
U. S. Army Curps of Engineers
California uepartment of Transportation
National Marine Fisheries Service
ENVIRONMEN iAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
the environmental factors checked below would be potentiaa-Ily affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a " Potentially Significant Impact" ur "PutvntialIy Significarn Unless Mitiganun Incurpurated" as indicatvd by the chvcklibt un the fullo wing pages.

Ll AestheticN
Agricultural Resources
Air Quality
X Biological Resources
X Cultural Resources
Ll GeoIugy arrd SuiIb
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards ( Fire) and Hazarduus
Materiaals
HydruIugy acrd Water ( duality
Land Use and Planning
MineraI Rcsuurcvs
Noise
Population and Housing
DE,rEKmINA1,iON (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the babib of thio initial cvaluatiun:

Public Services
Recreation
Ll Traaspurtauunn7CircuIation
Utilities and Service Systems
U Mairdatury Findings of
Significance
I find that the prupused project COULD NOT have a bignificant effect un the envirunment, and a NEGATIVE DECLAKATIUN will be prepared.

I find that althuuggh the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be X a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in this Initial Study have been added to the pruject. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the propused project MAY have a sigruficaut effect on the envirumncnt, and an ENVIRONMEN I AL IMPAC I Xh.PUKI is required.
utaAItU K—a m a cm.,,. c. eek n,. age Kennb; Ytnr; o„ Yr jest 4. GaI atudy s Packet Pg. 130 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effects) on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and ( 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, ifthe effect is a " potentially significant impact" or " potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects ( a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and ( b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
1 ' i
5 Jonathan Oldham
Name)
k- --
Date
Environmental Compliance Manager
Title)
U1d Ahuras Road and Churn Creek Bride Rehabilitation Yrojeci lnitial Mudy 4 Packet Pg. 131 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) EVALUArtON OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This scution analyzes the putential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this initial study include:

Aesthetics
Air Quality
Biulugival Resuurucs
Cultural Resources
Geology amid Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use and Planning
Mincral RwuLaucb
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Reurcatiun
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Transportation/ Circulation Hydrology m-ld Water (duality Utilities and Service Systems The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initis@ Study Checklist recommended by the CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of Redding in its cnvirumm ental review process. For the prclumiiiary environmental assessinent undertaken as part of this Initial Study' s preparation, a determination that there is a putcntial for signifwant effuuts indicates the need to more fully analyze the development' s impacts and to identify mitigation.

Fur the evaluation of putential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study The analysis considers the lung -term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responsesNo Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact un the envirunmunt_ Less Than Significant Impact. The dcvclupment will have the potential fur impacting the enviroImment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant.

Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. 1he development will have the potential to generate impacts which may be cunsidered as a signiticanit effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the development' s physical or operational uharautcristics uan reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant.

Potentially Significant Impact. The development will have impacts which are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identity mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels.

Where potentiaal impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation mcasures will be required, so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels.

List of attachments:

A. Project Location Map
B_ Project Area of Potential Effects
Prior en vironmental evaluations applicable to all orpart ofthe project site:

L City of Redding General Plan Filial Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH # 1998072103 utantt,.,— ttoaar a Chu,,. 17... P, oject J,, XUl6Yuay 5 Packet Pg. 132 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues ( and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

1. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? U A b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and histw it; buildings within a state scenic U a highway?
C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality ofthe site Li and its surroundings?
d, Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would u U l24
adversely affect day of nighttiinic views un the area?
Discussion
a_ the project will not obstruct any documented scenic vistas or represent a significant change to the overall scenic quality of the area
b. The piujcut site is uUt luLated adjauont to a state- designiatud sueniu highway. c. the project is compatible with the existing visual character ofthe property and its surroundings. d. Thv pnojuiit will uut add any now suurires of substantial light of g1aiv.

Documentation
City ofRedding General Plan Natural Resources Element, 2000 City of Redding Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18. 40 090
Mitigation
None necessary.

Potentially
r
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues aupportin Iiaformation Sources f impact Incorporated Impact imact

11. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES_ Would the proposal:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, of Farmland of Statewide Importanuo ( Farmland), as shown on the Hoops prepancd pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use'l
b. Couthut with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson act contract' 1
u. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their luuation or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- u u l21 agricultural use?
Discussion
a, b, c. the project site has not been historically used for agricultural purposes, nor does it possess soils that are prime for agricultural production.

Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 6 Packet Pg. 133 Octobe, A16 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) I]tocumeatatlon
City of Redding Cie„ cral Plana Backgound Report, Chapter 9. 4: Agricultural Lands United States Department OfAgriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Furest Serviuc, Soil Survey of Shasta County Area
Mitigation
Nu„ e neuessa, y.

III. AIx QUALI' T' Y. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable au quality Potentially
plan?
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
significant t
eaistinrg or projeuted air quality violation?
Im act
Tui'
cE ars
III. AIx QUALI' T' Y. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable au quality plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an eaistinrg or projeuted air quality violation?
c. Result in a uuirulatively corrsAciable „ ct inureasc of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment unde, au applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard ( including l24 releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
I Eapusc sensitive ncueptors to substautial pollutant uuiuenitratious? CH e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substaitial number ofpcople? CM Discussion
a, b, c. Shasta County, in, uludu,g the far northern Sacramento Valley, currently exceeds the state's ambient standards for uz,onc ( sirug) turd paliiuulatus ( tune, au bottle paMi iulcs). Consequently, these pollutants are the focus of local air quality policy, especially when related to land use and transportation planning. haven with applivatio„ of incabuncs to reduuc emissions for individual projects, cumulative impacts are unavoidable when ozone and/ or particulate emissions aro involved. For example, the primary source of emissions contributing to ozone is from vehicles. Any project that generates vehicle trips has the potential of contributing incrementally to the problem. The Environmental impact Report for the General Phu, acknowledged and addressed this issue.

Under policies of the General Plan Air Quality Element, a project has the potential to impact air quality primarily in two ways: ( 1) the project would generate vehicle -trip emissions ( with NOx, ROG, and PM,,,) that contribute cumulatively to local and regional air quality uurrditiuns; and ( 2) fugitive dust ( paUt iuulate/PM,J emissions are possible during construction activities. Application of standard air quality reductiun rrrcasures arc ruquBcd in order to strive toward the General Plan policy of a net reduction objective of 2u percent to address small- scale cumulative effects. In addition, pertinent SWPPP BMWs as discussed in Section vi and lx would be applied as necessary to address fugitive dust control.

These require, rtetits are standard development and construction regulations used by the City, promulgated in the Redding Mu„ aupal Code aid C:alitbi nia Buildu,g Code, and apply to all projects involving grading and/or earth disturbance. At a minimum, the following standard regulations would apply during grading and coistruution activities to uoutrul dust and PM,o emissions during the project. Additional BMPs detailed in the project -specific S WPPP prepared at the lane of construction would also apply.

1. No„ tu&iu soil stabilizers shall be applied auuu, dirrg to nttanufautu, cr' s specification to all inactive construction areas previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or irorc).

2. All grading operations shall be suspended when winds ( as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.

3. temporary traffic control shall be provided as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow c. g., tlag ponsorr).
01dAltu— K - d and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitari„ n rje.,t i„ itinl Study i Packet Pg. 134 Ocrobur 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

4. Construction activities that could substantially attect trRTic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours.

5. Active construction areas, haul roads, etc., shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust.

6. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill material shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind eiosioll.

7. All truckb hauling soil acid uthur loobe material shall bo covered or bhuuld maintain at lcubt 2 tevi oftrcoboard (ix., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of C V C Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local law enforcement agencies.

8. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by comirmaiou autiviTicb. STruutb bhall be bwcpt at the cud of the day if vibiblc buil watmialb arc carriod oiao adjauctit public pavcd ioadn,. Whcol wabhcrb or Gquivalcnnt 13MYz, shall be ubud where vchiuleb cnTcr and Gait utipaved ruadb onto paved roads, or trucks and any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site with each trip_

9. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project site shall be used unless otherwise deemed Infeasible by the City. Suitable alternatives include, but are slot limited to, oii- site chipphig and mulullhig and/ or hauling to a biomabb fucl bitc.
d, e_ the proposed project will not result in substantial pollutant concentrations or expose people to objectionable odors.

Documentation
ShmTa County APCD Air Quality Mauntcuancc Plan and lmplcuncuting Mcaburcni Redding Cictmial Plan Environmental impact Report, 2000 Redding cieneral Plan Natural Resources and Air duality Elements, 2uuu City ofRedding Construction Standards
Mifigailou
None necessary.
r
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
aificant h4i tion . Significant No
Issues and S ae.
1V. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly of through habitat ll odificatiotis, oi, any species identitied as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, a or by the California vepartment of i ish and wildlife or U. S. Fish and wildlife Service?
b_ Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat u, other bc11biTivc 11awral cutiunulnity identified in local or regional plans, c. Have
wildlife
a substantial
regulations
or u. s. rish
adverse
or
and
by
wildlife
the
effect
California -
on
service?
federally
Department
protected
of
wetlands
rish and
as
Ll A
L
defined by Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act (tilVludlllg, but iiVT ini LN
iiiTcd To, liiarbh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means' l
d. interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established Native iesideia yr migrarly wildlife roti do, A, o, impede the ube of native wildlife utubury sites'?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological La resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? EM7A1tnrdc lt—a a„ a (.h— C, VVK B age nEn. nttltut;— I.,,T;. 161ady 8 Packet Pg. 135 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Potentially
Significant '
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact Im act f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natuial Community C:unscrvatiu,i Plan, ur uthcr approved local, U U ca reglu„ al, ui state habitat uunse, vatiu„ plan!
lliscussion
a, d. Salmonids. Fall -run Chinook salmon and late -fall -run Chinook salmon are both considered Species of Special Cuncum by the National Marine 1~ ishc, ius Service and the State Department ofFish and Wildlife. Central Valley steelhead are considered to be Federally Threatened wider the 1~oderal Ei dangered Species Act. Churn Crock supports a lu iitcd number of these salmonids at different times of the year. luring winter and spring when flows are adequate and water temperatures are less than 25° C, adult Chinook salmon ( fall -run and late -fall -run) and Central valley steelhead have a high potential to migrate through the ESL to spawn iii suitable habitats upstream. Additionally, juvenile Chinook salmon tall -run and late -tall -run) and steelhead have a high puteiiiial to utllizu Chu„ Creek withui the ESL tai natal and uuunatal rearing. Although no salmonids were tound during held studies of the ESL, the proposed work has the potential to directly and indirectly affect Central valley steelhead, fall -run and late -fall -run Chinook salmon, the primary constituent elements ( PCEs) of critical habitat for Central Valley steelhead, and essential fish habitat ( EFH) for the fall -run and latetall-ruii. Thcsc cMuts uuuld uucu, as it , csult of bridge pica/ abutme, iT uuiistructiuu and concomitant streambed loss, inbtallatiui, of the temporary uunstructiun aucess roads and gravel pad, riparian vugumtiuu , uniuval, pile d, ivi„ g, and increased sedimentation in the stream system.

Direct effects on salmonids are not expected to occur given the work windows and other avoidance and minimization uicabuicb p, upuscd. T'hc iii- watc, wuik window du, ii,g the warm sunnnc, u,uuths is designed to avoid dircut cttircts on salmo„ ids that may be present at other times ofthe year. indirect ettects on salmonids could potentially occur if sedimc„ is or other pollutants enter Churn Creek and degrade rearing habitat in the hSL and/ or spawning habitat downstream. in addition, riparian scrub removal along Churn Creek could contribute to a reduction in the invertebrate food supply, elevation of water temperatures, and impairment of water quality. Potential indirect effects on salmonids due to sediments u, pollutants cutc, ing Chun, C; rcck can be avuided/,,, inlmized with implcuic„ tatiu„ ut _Bust Managcu, c„ t P, actiuus to, erosion control and spill prevention.

Potential indirect effects on salmonids due to removal of riparian vegetation are expected to be negligible because: the amount of i, ivertebiate food puie, itially uuutributcd to Churn Crock by the impacted vegetation is not substantial, the new biidgc duck would pruvidu n, ure shade to Churn Creek than the existing brid& c presently docs mud would mute than ottact any potential loss of shade; and planting native riparian vegetation in temporarily disturbed areas and in rip -rap around the bridge supports would stabilize the stream bank and minimize the introduction of sediments into Churn creek, which would i ninimizu potential innnpauts to water quality.

Construction of the temporary access roads and gravel work pad could potentially disrupt stream flow and tisk migration corridor connectivity. installation of culverts to maintain flow will ensure that upstream and downstream migration of salmonids and other aquatic life is not affected.

Thu Mucied strearnbed and corresponding water column in Chun Creek mulude the tolluwing PCEN of uridual habitat that are essential tot the conservation of Central valley steelhead: treshwater rearing sites and treshwater migration corridors. ( liven the negligible loss of these two PCEs in the ESL and the extent of these two .FChs elsewhere in Churn Creek, in -water work would have a negligible effect on critical habitat for Central valley steelhead.

Thr, effects of the piujuct un Central Vallcy sicclhund, fall -tun Chinook salmon, laic -tall -run Chinook salmon, PC:ES of critical habitat for Central Valley steelhead, and hl ti for the tall -run and late -tall -run could potentially be signiticant, however, the effects will be considered less than significant given implementation of the mitigation measures described below.

Old Alturas Road and Chum Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 9 Packet Pg. 136 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Western Pond Turtle. The western pond turtle is a Sia a Spekaus of Special Concern. It' s found in ponds, rivers, streams, ditches, and sloughs up to 6000 It in elevation. 1t prefers ponds ur slow , nuving streams with deep puuls. Pond turtles are known to be present in Churn Creek, and although they were not observed during field surveys of the p, oje; t area, thuic is a high potential for them to forage or disperse through the area during the spring and summer months.

Potential direct effects on pond turtles uuuld uut.;u, if they are piuscui duiuig u, -ware, work activities. If present, the animals could be trapped or injured/ killed as a result of being crushed by construction equipment u, by plalcn, cni of construction -related materials. Potential indirect effects include habitat degradation if sediment -laden water enters Churn C, cek. The effect of the project on pond turtles is considered to be potentially significant; however, the effects will be Uu„ sidu, ud less than significant given implementation of the mitigation measures described below r'oottiill Yellow -Legged k'rog. The foothill yellow -legged frog is a State Species of Spc,.;ial Concern. It inhabits mucky, perennial streams and rivers_ During the summer months, frogs prefer stream channels that provide exposed basking sites acid cool bhady areas. Although the frogs have not been reported in Churn Creek, they have been reported in watersheds north of Redding. No frUgb wc, c 5ccu du, il,g field studies for the p, oject. The site has a low potential to provide the habitat required for the frogs.

Potential direct effects on foothill yellow -legged frogs ( including their egg masses and tadpoles) could occur if frogs are pmcsent in in -water work areas during construction. If present, the animals could be trapped or injured/ killed as a result of being u, ubhcd by construction equipment or by placement of construction -related materials. Potential indirect effects include habitat degradation if sediment - laden watc, ente, s Chun, C, cck.

Given the lack of frogs in the project area, the low potential for them to occur in the project area, and the low potential for suitable habitat, the effect of the project on the frogs is considered to be less than significant_ However, measures implun,unrd tu, the wvbwin pend turtle will help ensu, r. theme is no pate„ tial fom advemse affects on the frogs. Any frogs, egg masses, or tadpoles will be relocated to a sate location upstream or downstream of the wu, k area.

Western Red Bat. The western red bat is a state Species of Special Concern_ western red bats typically forage and roost i„ , iparian habka[ s and arc strongly asbui; iatcd with mature ,; parian habitats that are over 50 meters wide. Roosting is expected to ueeur primarily in the largest , ipar1an trees, pam[ ieularly i„ sy.; amuics and uuuu„ wuuds. ' Ibc bat has been reported approximately 1 U miles southwest of the hSL. Kiparian vegetation in the ESL may provide marginally suitable foraging and roosting habitat for the bat. vegetation removal may result in a minor loss of potential foraging and roosting habitat for the bat
liven that there is a low potential for this bat to be p, usunt at the p, ujcut situ, the potential c$ evis of the piujcct on the western red bat are considered less than significant_ However, to ensure that western , ed bats and other bats of conce, n are not adversely affected during project construction, a bat survey will be conducted by a qualified bat biologist prior to the start of construction_ If bats are found to be roosting in the ESL, appropriate measures shall be prescribed by the bat biulug; st to c„ su, c that b, idge demolition and , iparian vegetation mcmoval do not mesult in take of bats.

Migratory lairds. 1he federal Migratory turd Treaty Act requires that nesting migratory birds not be affected by human activities. No active bird nests were observed in the ESL during the field inspections, although several bird nests constructed in p, iom nesting seasons were observed in trees upstream of the bridge, just outside the ESL. Nesting mgmatu, y buds, , f p, cscut i„ futu, c „ cbi;ug scasous, could be di,eudy o, i„ di, cctly affected by vegetation me,,, oval and construction activities.

Direct effects could include mortality resulting from removal of vegetation containing an active nest with eggs or chicks.

Indirect effects could include nest abandonment by adults in response to loud noise levels or human encroachment, or a cduaion u, the amount offood available iv young buds duc to i hangcs u, teeding bchaviu, by adults. Uivc„ the pveGniial for the project to impact nesting migratory birds during construction activities, the effects of the project are conside, ed to be potentially significant; however, the effects will be considered less than significant given implementation of the mitigation measures described below
aldAltum. Road mea C7hH Cr6eK/ SnHge Stuay 10 Packet Pg. 137 Oclobe, - 1016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) b. Implementation or the project will RTect Churn Creek and riparian scrub habitat along the creek. Extension of the bridge piers and abutments, installation of bridge supports, and placernvrrt of rock slope protcUiuu under the bridgr. will result in the permanent fill of approx. 0. 08 ac of Churn Creek. the project would also permanently impact about U. U7 ac or riparian scrub vegetation within the ESL. There would also be approximately 0. 03 ac of riparian scrub temporarily impautcd by plaucruout of a wurpurary auuuss road and work pads in the creek.

Although these impacts are not considered significant, measures will be implemented to rcduuc and rrrirrurrizc adverse project effects to the extent feasible. temporary use areas will be restored to preconstruction uonditiuns, iriuludnrg revegetation providing the same or higher density of native woody riparian species, in accordance with the Riparian Rayroratior, Play, - Uld Alturas Ruad Bridge Rehabilitation Project at Churn Creek.

C_ A wetland delineation was conducted within the ESL to determine if wetlands arc piescra. The study drtcuuured there are no wetlands present within the ESL.
e, L The City has adopted a ' 1'rc ' Yivsci vatiuu Urduranuc ( Chapter 18. 65 of the Redding Municipal Code) that promotes the conservation of mature, healthy trees in the design of crew dcvclupmcut. ' I'hc Tice Piuscrvatiuu Urdirrance recognizes that the preservation of trees will sometimes conflict with normal land -development considerations. There are rro cuntliuts associated with the project that will prevent implementation of the free Preservation ordinance or other resourceprutcuiiuu urdirramus. Them is no Habitat Cunscr vation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat wase, va[iuu plan wvarurg the prujcut site.

Documentation
Old Alturas Road at Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project, Natural Environment Study ( Minimal Impacts), ENPLAN, 2015
Riparian Restoration Plan - old Alturas Road Bridge Rchabilitmiurr Prujout at Churn Creek, ENPLAN, 2015 Redding General Plan Natural Resources Element, 2000
City of Redding Municipal Code 18. 45, Tree Management Urdinance City of Redding General Plan EIR, 2000
Mitigation
the following mitigation measures will be implemented to ensure project effects are less than sigrifivaut:

1. In -water construction activities, and all pile -driving activities in Chum Creek, will be limited to the period between luno 1 and October 31, or as may uthciwisu by spe6ticd through jurisdictional permits and approvals issued by the NA*' S, Cllr W, AGUE, and/or RWQCB. if work is proposed outside of the agcrruy- appruvrd work wurduws, the City will obtain approval from those agencies prior to conducting such work, and implement any additional measures that ruay be required. In -water pile driving will only be conducted during daytime hours defined as beginning one- half hour atter sunrise and Winding gine- half hour prior to sunset, or as defured by resource agency permits and approvals.

2. temporary work pads or crossings within the stream will be constructed using clean, washed, ruurrdcd gravel, 1- 4 inches in diameter, and will meet the Caltrans gravel cleanliness specification No_ 85. unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, upon completion of the project, all gravel, including any contaminated gravel, will be removed from the creek bunurn, cxucpt ter the last 6 irahus of Mean, unuuutarninatcd gravel will be left in place to prevent erosion and protect original streambed conditions.

3. All temporary use areas will be restored to preconstruction conditions providing the same or higher density of native woody riparian species, in accordance with the Riparian Restoration Plan - Old Alturas Road Bridge Rehabilitation Project at Churn Creck. Existing woody vegetation will be pruned at ground level prior to work and protected during wrrstruutrun to allow regrowth upon uumplctrurr, of the piujcut.

4. Environmental Sensitive Area ( ESA) fencing will be placed to minimize impacts and prevent unnecessary excursion into protected areas of the creek.

5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) will be prepared for the prujcut whiuh will uutlirrc Best Management Practices ( BMPs) for erosion control and spill prevention. Implementation of BMPs will minimize the potential for adverse impacts to fish, water quality, and the aquatic ecosystem.

U0A11,.— Aad —if AI—, 11 Packet Pg. 138 OV10h., Alu Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

6. Prcuollstruction surveys for western pond turtles will be conducted by a qualified biologist immediately prior to the start of 111 - wale, work each day that ill -water work occurs. Any wesicrn pond turtles, or foothill yellow -legged frogs, eggs masses, or tadpoles that are also found, will be relocated to a sate location upstream or downstream of the work area.

7. Preconstruction surveys for nesting migratory birds will be conducted if vegetation removal or activities affecting swallow riustiug or, the caistu- Ig bridge occurs between March 1 and August 1. Surveys will be uullducicd withal 3 days prior to the pluposcd work. It uestulg birds are found, the nest site shall not be disturbed u11til Oer the young have fledged_ if an active raptor nest is present, no vegetation removal or construction activities will occur within 25U feet of the nest, unless a smaller buffer zone is authorized by the Cum. Appropriate buffer zones may be established for other nesting birds by a biologist approved by the City, The City may utilize a variety of measures to prevent birds from nesting or, the bridge, hicludillg the use of bioacoustic deterrents ( e. g., broadcast calls), ulstallatiort of vxulusium:uy materials ( e. g.,, Teflon or plast; u shGetirrg or other materials that would not entangle birds) in the winter prior to construction, or removal of partially constructed nests following confirmation by a qualified biologist that no eggs or chicks are present ( completed nests must not be removed).
x. All required permits and authoriLatiums shall be obta111cd ItUm state and federal lusumuc agericies pilot tV arty uunstruul urt activities withal Waters of the U. S. All terms and conditions of the required permits and authorizations shall be met.

V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change ill the significance of a histor; ual 1cstiuluc as dctumd u1 CEQA Uuidclmes § 15U64. 57
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological

U A U U
resource pursuant to UhQA Guidelines § 15u64. 5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or L) El O IN unique geologic fcaturc?
d. Disturb any huiman iumauls, i iuludillg those interred outside of formal Ll 0 U X cemeteries?
Discussion
a, c. No historical resources as detuled un CEQA Sec. 15064. 5 are located within the Arca of Potential Effutas ( APE). In addition, nil unique geologic features, fossil - bearing strata, or paleontological sites are known to exist on the project site.

D, d. Archival research, consultation with the Native American community, and an intensive archaeological survey indicated the presence of cultural resources in the project area. Intensive field studies were conducted to dewmi llc the potential sigriticancc utthuse resources. As a result, it was dctc1111i1ied that there are 11u known archaeological resources as detuled ul CEQA ( iuidelu' les Section 15U64. 5 that will be affected by the project. However, in order to ensure that no presently undocumented and potentially significant archaeological resources that may be located in or adjacent to the project site will be affected, mitigation will be implemented. With implementation of mitigation measures, the project will not have a significant effect on archaeological resources.

Duum" Untatiun
Archaeological Survey report for the proposed Old Alturas road Bridge rehabilitation project at Churn Creek, ENPLAN, 2U15.

Archaeological Evaluation Report ( Phase ll) Proposed tut the Old Alturas Road Bridge Rchab; litatiun Project at Churn Crock, ENPLAN, July 2016
Old Alta.., rc— d and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 12 October 2016 Potentially
Significant
a Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
bn act Incorporated Impact Impact .

V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change ill the significance of a histor; ual 1cstiuluc as dctumd u1 CEQA Uuidclmes § 15U64. 57
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological

U A U U
resource pursuant to UhQA Guidelines § 15u64. 5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or L) El O IN unique geologic fcaturc?
d. Disturb any huiman iumauls, i iuludillg those interred outside of formal Ll 0 U X cemeteries?
Discussion
a, c. No historical resources as detuled un CEQA Sec. 15064. 5 are located within the Arca of Potential Effutas ( APE). In addition, nil unique geologic features, fossil - bearing strata, or paleontological sites are known to exist on the project site.

D, d. Archival research, consultation with the Native American community, and an intensive archaeological survey indicated the presence of cultural resources in the project area. Intensive field studies were conducted to dewmi llc the potential sigriticancc utthuse resources. As a result, it was dctc1111i1ied that there are 11u known archaeological resources as detuled ul CEQA ( iuidelu' les Section 15U64. 5 that will be affected by the project. However, in order to ensure that no presently undocumented and potentially significant archaeological resources that may be located in or adjacent to the project site will be affected, mitigation will be implemented. With implementation of mitigation measures, the project will not have a significant effect on archaeological resources.

Duum" Untatiun
Archaeological Survey report for the proposed Old Alturas road Bridge rehabilitation project at Churn Creek, ENPLAN, 2U15.

Archaeological Evaluation Report ( Phase ll) Proposed tut the Old Alturas Road Bridge Rchab; litatiun Project at Churn Crock, ENPLAN, July 2016
Old Alta.., rc— d and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 12 Packet Pg. 139 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Mitigation

1. 1„ viro, n„ ental Sensitive Areas ( ESA) will be established at the project site as delineated in the ESA Actio„ Plan, prepared for and approved by caltrans who has lead authority over cultural resources pursuant to tede, al law. 2_ A qualified archaeologist and Native Ame, iiran will n, onito, eacavatlon and initial ground disturbing construction activities in the portion of the APB within IOU It of known cultural sites, or as defined in the hSA Action Plan. if intact cultu, al deposits are found, all work shall cease in the area, and the archaeologist shall recommend appropriate conservation measures to be implemented prior to re- initiation of the work.

3. In the event archaeological deposits are discovcrud du, i„ g project activities anywhere on the project site, all work in the vicinity of the discove,y shall be stopped immediately and the resident engineer and archaeologist notified. The archaeologist shall , ecommend appropriate conservation measures to be implemented prior to re- initiation of the work.

4. if human remains are discovered during project activities, all wo, k will stop in the vicinity of the find and the Shasta County Coroner' s Office shall be noutied. ' I',eatme„ t of the , emams shall be conducted in accordance with the direction of the Corona ana7u, the Native American Heritage Commission, as appropriate.

Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues ( and Supporting Information Sources): impact Incorporated' impact Impact vi. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the p, oposal:
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial advorso oftoots, including the risk ofloss, injury, or death involving:
1) Rupture of know„ east FiquRe fault, as delineated on the most nice„ t Alquist- P, iolo Eff FiquRe vault Loning map issued by the State Ueologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence Ll X of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and GeoluTy Spccial Publication 42.
2) Strong seismic ground- shRing? 01
3) Seis, nic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? C9 4) Landslides? . Li IK
b. Kesult in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 3 c. Be located on a geologic unit o, soil that is unstable, or that would buco, no unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- N o, off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse'!
d. Be located on expansive soil, as detumd i„ 2010 California Building Ll l2Q Code Section 1803. 5. 3, crating substantial risks to life or property! e. Havo soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available Li Ll Ll 773 for the disposal of wastewatert
miscussion
a, c, d. Thee are no Alquist- Priolo earthquake faults designated in the Kedding area of Shasta County. Them are no othe, documented eaUt Fiquake faults in the vicinity that pose a significant risk, and the site is locawd u, an area designated in the Health and Safety Element of the General Plan as having a low Wround- shiiRing potential. The project is not located on or near any documented landslide hazard areas, and the, e is no evidence of ground slippage or subsidence occurring naturally on the site. The type of soils and underlying geology is identified as having no potential for liquefaction. No portion of the site falls within the 1U0 -year floodplain of the Sacramento Kiver_ OldAlturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabllitutiv V vjcct Mdiaf Dtuay 1. 1 Packet Pg. 140 October eM Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) b. The majority of the project site is located on a flat and busy city street suitoundad by soinu 1Gslduninil development.

The bridge crosses ovvi Chum Cieck wheio thou is the pate„ tial for erosion to occur during construction. The project is subjuct to certain erosion -control requirements mandated by existing City and state regulations. these requirements include:

City of Redding Storm Water Quality Management urO Disz•hurge Cvrttral UrXnaricu. This ordinance requires pir,paration of a Swim Watei Pollution PieventlUil Plan ( SWPPP) for projects such as this. The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify the sources of sediment and other pollutants that affect the quality of storm water discharges, and to describe and ensure the implementation of Best Management Practices ( BMPs) to reduce those sources of sediment and other pollutants in storm water discharges.

State Water Resources Control Board " Construction Generul Perrnir. " This pe, mit suincwhat overlaps the City' s storm watci oidivauw by applying state standards for erosion- coutrol measures during construction of the project. the permit requires that a S WPPP be prepared to address storm water management. e, The project does not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal.

Documentation
Ciry of Redding Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge control urdinance, KMC Sec. 14. 19 City of Kedding General Plan background Keport, 1998
Soil Survey of Shasta County Area, USDA, Soil Conservation Service and Foicst Service, August 1974 Division of Mines and GeoloTy Special Publication 42, Titlad: Fault-Ruprure Hazard Zones in California; Figure 4U, Utticial Maps of E rffi quKKu Fault 'Zones
State Water Kesources Control Board, General Permit for Storm water -Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities, 2U12
Mitigation
None nucussaiy.
vu. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the piuposal:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that O O Ll C1 may have a significant impact on the enviioinnent7
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, ui iugulation adopted for the U C9 purpose otiuducing greenhouse gas emissions'!
Discussion
a_ 1n 2uu5, the Governor of California sued Exrcutivr. Uidui S- 3- 05 establishing that it is the State of California' s goal to reduce statewide greenhouse gas ( UHU) emission levels. Subsequently, in 2UU6, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill AB 32, the California Ulobal Warming Solutions Act. in part, AB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board to develop and adopt regulations to achieve a reduction in the state' s GHG emissions to 1990 levels by Year 2020.

Subsequently, California Senate Bill SB 97 was adopted establishing that an individual prnjuct' s effect on UHU cinission levels and global warming must be assessed undc- i CEQA. SB 97 further directed that the State Uftice of Planning and Research ( OPK) develop guidelines for the assessment of a project' s GHG emissions. . hose guidelines for UHG emissions weir, subsequently included as amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. he united States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) identifies four primary constituents that are most representative of the UHU rniissions. '. hey are:

Carbon Dioxide ( CO2). Emitted primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Other sources include the bump tg of solid waste and wood and/ or wood products and cement manufacturing.

Old Ali., a., Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 14 O,, iab. r 2016 Less Than
Significant No
Issues and Sn orlin Information Sources
vu. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the piuposal:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that O O Ll C1 may have a significant impact on the enviioinnent7
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, ui iugulation adopted for the U C9 purpose otiuducing greenhouse gas emissions'!
Discussion
a_ 1n 2uu5, the Governor of California sued Exrcutivr. Uidui S- 3- 05 establishing that it is the State of California' s goal to reduce statewide greenhouse gas ( UHU) emission levels. Subsequently, in 2UU6, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill AB 32, the California Ulobal Warming Solutions Act. in part, AB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board to develop and adopt regulations to achieve a reduction in the state' s GHG emissions to 1990 levels by Year 2020.

Subsequently, California Senate Bill SB 97 was adopted establishing that an individual prnjuct' s effect on UHU cinission levels and global warming must be assessed undc- i CEQA. SB 97 further directed that the State Uftice of Planning and Research ( OPK) develop guidelines for the assessment of a project' s GHG emissions. . hose guidelines for UHG emissions weir, subsequently included as amendments to the CEQA Guidelines. he united States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) identifies four primary constituents that are most representative of the UHU rniissions. '. hey are:

Carbon Dioxide ( CO2). Emitted primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Other sources include the bump tg of solid waste and wood and/ or wood products and cement manufacturing.

Old Ali., a., Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 14 Packet Pg. 141 O,, iab. r 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Methane ( CH4)- Emissions occur during the production and transport of fuels, such as coal and natural gas.

Additional emissions are generated by livestock and agricultural land uses, as well as the decomposition of solid waste.

Niiruus Oxide ( N, U). The principal vinitwis iiiulude agricultural and industrial land uses and fossil fuel and waste combustiun.

Fluorinated vases: These can be emitted during some industrial activities. Also, many ofthese gases are substitutes for ozone- depleting substances, such as CFCs, which have been used historically as refrigerants. Collectively, these gases are often referred to as " high global -warming potential" gases.

The primary generators of UHU emissions in the United States are electricity generation and transportation. " Ihe EPA estimates that nearly 85 percent of the nation' s uHU emissions are comprised of carbon dioxide ( CU2). The majority of CO. emissions is generated by petroleum consumption associated with transportation and coal consumption, which is in rum associated with eleutriuity guncrz[ ion. Thom remaining emissions arc predomiliately the result of natural- gas consumption associated with a variety of uses.

According to the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's ( CAPCOA) publication, CLQA and Climate Change, published in January 2008, there is currently not a single computer model that is capable of estimating all of a piUNLXs
dui
vLa and indi,ed UHU emissions. Huwevei, the Urban Emissions Model ( URBEMIS) is likely the nest consistently used model to estimate a project's direct UHU emissions. UKBEM1S is designed to model emissions associated with development of urban land uses. u" hmiS summarizes criteria air pollutants and CU2 emissions that would occur during construction and operation of new development. URBEMIS was developed and is approved for statewide use by CARB. One of the shortfalls of URBEMIS is that the model does not contain emission factors for GHGs uthu, than CO,, cacupt to, methane ( CH,,) truni nubile suurL;es, which is uunverted to CU,. This may not be a niajur problem since CU2 is the most important U1.1U from land development projects.

With regard to the project, the predominant associated GHG is CO, generated by motor -vehicle travel to and from the site.

The California Air Resources Board ( CARB) has recommended the use of 10, 000 metric tons of carbon diamdu equivalent pvr year ( rrrtCU,.cq/yi) as the " de mirillnus gas emission threshold" in its Climate Change proposed Scoping Plaii, whish was approved by CARB' s Board on January 9, 2009. According to CAPCUA, the IU, 000 mtCU2eq/ yr is equivalent to 55U dwelling units, 400,000 square feet of office use, 120, 000 square feet ofretail, or 70,000 square feet of supermarket use.

The proposed project emissions due tu cunsiructiou arc substantially wi& i the equivaWiri luvcls iequn' W tui wrrstruimmi of thcsc piujccts. Uivcn the scope and nature of the proposed project, emissions from the project are significantly below the thresholds put forth by CAKB, as well as the City of Kedding' s air- quality thresholds. therefore, the project will not contribute significantly to UHU emissions in the air basin_ However, to reduce any potential contribution to negative effects from GHG emissions, as discussed in Section III above, City construction standards and measures will be implemented during the pruject. Many of these rnmasures arc also listed irr the State Attuiney Ciencial' s rewrrnriended measures to reduce UHU emissions.
n. The project does not conflict with any applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As noted in " a" above, and in Suctiuir in, tM piujc t is irr uvntuirnanuc with the City of RWding' s au quality policies and thresholds, and with state guidelines and regulations.

Documentation
uKBhmS (2007, v 9.2.4) Air Quality Computer Model
Redding General Plan Air Quality Element, 2000
CAPCOA w0sitc, July 2010.

Caliturnia Ottice of the Attorney Ueneral, " The Calitornia Environmental ( duality Act Addressing Ulobat warming Impacts at the Local Agency Level," updated liecember 9, 2UU8.

Mitigation
Norm ncucssary.
utaAlf, a., rcoaa Una Un,,,,, c.:, eex v,;dge f,,XZT[ w..dy 11) Packet Pg. 142 Ociober 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) i
0, C a
Potentially. lin
Significant'
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources . Ine " act .: = lDn ct V111- HAZARDS A1VU HA%AKDUUS MATERIALS. would the
proposal:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials'! b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions i„ volv"' g the A release Fit hazardous,,, aic, ialb i.,iu the envirunn, cnt7 Eunit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing 3 or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazarduub materials sites compiled pursuant to Ciuveiiu„ cut Code Suction 65962. 5 and, as A
a, usult, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e. Foo a p, yjuut located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or h.
f.
g_
Por
project
proj
impair
Expose
people
emergency
eut
a project
use
residing
implementation
result
arca?
people
airport,
respo„
within
in
or
or
a safety
structures
sc
working
would
the
plan,
of
vicinity
hazard
the
ur
or
in
to
cn,
physically
project
the
a
c,
for
of
significant
guncy
project
a
people
private
result
interfere
evacuation
areal
residing
in
risk
airstrip,
a safety
of
with
loss,
plan?
o,
would
an
hazard
wo,
injury
adopted
ki„
the
g
for
or
i,i the
Li Li LI
A
C&
A
death involving wildland foes, including where wildlandb arc Ca O adjauent to urbanized areas u, whc, c , csidunccs arc imc,,,, iacd with w ildlands'?
DINVU53JIUn
a, b, c, u. the nature and scope of the proposed project does not present a significant risk related to hazardous materials or emissions- Although there are petroleum products and chemicals that will be used at the project site, standard Bcst Management Prauti; vs ( BMPs) will be implcmcntrA to p, evcnt spills and to contain and manage spills should they occur.

As requij ud by construction standards, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ( S wrPP) will be prepared by the contractor to address prevention and management of spills. there are no documented hazardous material sites located on or near the project.
e, f. The projuut is not withal an ai, purt land use plan arca and would not conflict with upuratiuns of an airport or present a safcty hazard to people working or residing in the area. there are no private airstrips in the project vicinity. g. the project does not involve a use or activity that could interfere with e, nergency- response or emergency - evacuation plans for the area. Access to all arcazi within the p, ujcia arca will be available r e, nc, gcucy , cspunsc vuhiulcs at all times. h_ Thr, p, ujea site is located within a mostly developed residential area of xedding. Although that portion of the project near Churn cr is undeveloped, and portions of adjacent residential parcels contain remnant oak woodlands, the relative small size of the area and the wet creek environment will help prevent spread of fine given the type of vugelatiun and presence of water. In addition, standard bpuciticatiunb , cquuc the contractor to prepare a tire prevention plan. The plan add, esscs tine prevuntiun, management, and protocols in case of fire.

Old Alturas Road and Churn Creelc Hr;age Renubititat; un rruject [rsXut 3ru4 10 Packet Pg. 143 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Documentation
City of Redding Gene, al Plan Health and Safety Elen, cnt, 2000 City of Ruddiug ( kticial Plan Fiial Euvi oiunciital lmpact Report, Chaptc, 8 ( Health and 5afvty) City of.Redding General Plan. Background Report, Chapter 10, Health and Safety Element, 1998 City of.Redding construction standards
Mitigation
Nu„ v uccussary.
violate any water quality standards or waste - discharge requirements'! Potentially
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially significant
with groundwater recharge such that the, e would be a net deficit in 3 n
k
Unless Less Than
the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level t
Significant
which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which Incorporated Impact 7m '"aet
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. violate any water quality standards or waste - discharge requirements'! C51 b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the, e would be a net deficit in aquitc, vuluu, e u, a lowe, mg ofthe local gruu„ dwate, table level ( c. g., 01 the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing draiiiage patter„ ofthe site o, area, i.mulud,,, g thruugh the afie, atio„ ofthe cou, se of strep,„ o, Ave,, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite'! d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern ofthe site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or rive,, o, substantially i„ c, ease the , ate o, amount of surface runotf in a manner which would result in flooding on- or otf- site'!
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additio„ al sources of polluted , u„ off?
f: Othc, wisc substantially degrade water quality'! l2Q g. Place housing within a i 00 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other 3 flood hazard delineation map?
h. Place within a 100 - year flood - hazard area structures which wuuld CH
impede or redirect flood flows'!

1. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result ofthe failure of a ca levee or dam?
j Inundation by seiche, tsunami, o, mudflow? 124
Discussion
a, r_ the project will not cause a violation of any waste -discharge requirements or water quality standards, or substantially degrade water quality. Permits will be obtained from the Regional Wate, Quality Control Buard, Dvpartmv„ t of Fish and Wildlife, and the U. S. Army Cups of E„ gi„ ee, s whiuh will allow construction activities in wuTlands, streams, and drainages that exist on the project site. The permits will condition the project to implement measures that will prevent Ula All.,— novas acn.,,, c, eex ts,. age lte0n0JJatio„ Y. ojua J.; t+at Nuay Ii Packet Pg. 144 Oe, ober 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) degradation of water quality. in addition, the city uses construction standards that require all projects to prepare a plan To address water pollution control. the construction standards and specifications for the project will require that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( S WPPP) be prepared by the contractor prior to construction. The plan will ensure that wit ei quality standards arc nut substantially affected by the prujuut. It is the City' s standard practice to incorporate resource agency permit conditions and required construutiun standards in the project plans and specifications. b. The project would utilize City water service for domestic uses and fire protection. The proposed project would not impact groundwater supplies.

C. The project will not substantially alter the eAisting drainage pattern of the area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The bridge will be rehabilitated and widened in place.
d, c. The piujcct will nut substmnially alta the uAistuig diauiagu parkin ut the arca, UnJudnlg through the alleiatiuu of the course of a stream or river. 1t will not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. 1t will not create run- off which wold exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted water. g, h, 1_ The piujua situ is luuated within the mapped 100 year fluudplaui of Chum Cicck. Hydiaulic studies completed for the project determined that there will be no increase in flood risk as a result of the project. The project will not place or expose new structures in a flood -hazard area or floodplain, nor will it expose people to flood risks.

J. The threat of a tsunami wave is not applivablc to uiland, ue„ tral valley wnununities such as Redding. Seiches could potentially be gunciatcd ii, either Shasta or Whiskuytuwu LiNes during an u ralquKe. Huwcvri, neithci lKe has been identified in the Health and Saffety Element of the General - Flan as having any risk to the City under such circumstances.

There is no documented threat of mud flows affecting the project site.

Documentntiuu
City ofRedding Hoodpiam Evaluation Report for the Uld Alturas Road bridge at Churn Creek, August 2U16 City of Redding Storm -) rain Master -Flan, Montgomery- Watson Engineers 1991 City of Redding Storm water Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, RMC Sec. 14. 19 FEMA Floodplain Maps
Mitigation
None necessary.

X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Physically divide an established unniu niry`! u U U A b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project ( including, but not limited to, the guneial plan, spec itic plan, luual uuastal program, ui tuning U U U la u. dinanue) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect"
u. Cuutliut with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural u Ll C9
community conservation plan!
d. Have social u, cuunumiu impacts resulting in a physical deterioration of the environment ( economic blight)'!
Discussion
a. The project does not have the potential to physically divide an established community.

V( aATMan Kvaa ana Ch..,,, C. eek n, edge KehabdJur v , r, jmf i,,;< iul bi.. dy 13 Oeroher 2016 Potentially
Significant
4 h , I Potentially Unless Less Than
Wes lijlll, i
Significant
Im act
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Imact
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Physically divide an established unniu niry`! u U U A b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project ( including, but not limited to, the guneial plan, spec itic plan, luual uuastal program, ui tuning U U U la u. dinanue) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect"
u. Cuutliut with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural u Ll C9
community conservation plan!
d. Have social u, cuunumiu impacts resulting in a physical deterioration of the environment ( economic blight)'!
Discussion
a. The project does not have the potential to physically divide an established community.

V( aATMan Kvaa ana Ch..,,, C. eek n, edge KehabdJur v , r, jmf i,,;< iul bi.. dy 13 Packet Pg. 145 Oeroher 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) b. The project is compatible with the applicable policies and regulations of the City General Flan and Luuing Uidinanco and is not in conflict with any other Flan adopted by a jurisdictional agency for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect_
c. Thc1c arc iio habitat cviiselvativii on 1lattlial cvlluutlllity couservatiuii plans that die applicable Tv the sire. d_ There are no structures or other infrastructure elements that will be 5I ected by the project that could result in a physical deterioration of the environment.

D VL LL W Cllt$ trUll
City Of Redding General Flan Community Developmout Eleme,it City of Redding General Flan rinal Environmental impact Report City of Redding Natural Resources Element
Miligatiuu
None necessary.

Xl. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pivpvsal:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that [ a would be of value to the iegiou and the , usidcuts of the state? b. ResulT iu the loss uf availability of a locally impurtant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific Em plan or other land use plan?
Discussion
a, b. Tho p, qj7oct site is not identified in the General Flan as having any known mineral - resource value or as being located within any " Critical Mineral Resource Uverlay" area.

Documentation
City of Reddiulg Natural Resources ElewcuT, 2000
Mitigation
None necessary -
PJ
Uiiess Less Than
I eadn# Mitigation Significant No
Issues ( and Supporting Information Sources). impact Incorporated impact Imuact XII. NOISE_ would the proposal result in:
a. Eaposuto of poisous to Oi gcuciatiou of uoisc levels in oa; oss of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or F& applicable standards of other agencies?
b_ Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground - borne vibration of gotuid- bume 1ioise levels?
u. A substantial permanent mc, ease in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Old Almras Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 19 Oetobe, 2016 Potentially
Kµ Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues oirtiti . iatii es :

Significant Mitigation , Significant No
and"`Su` + oa < b. impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Xl. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pivpvsal:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that [ a would be of value to the iegiou and the , usidcuts of the state? b. ResulT iu the loss uf availability of a locally impurtant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific Em plan or other land use plan?
Discussion
a, b. Tho p, qj7oct site is not identified in the General Flan as having any known mineral - resource value or as being located within any " Critical Mineral Resource Uverlay" area.

Documentation
City of Reddiulg Natural Resources ElewcuT, 2000
Mitigation
None necessary -
PJ
Uiiess Less Than
I eadn# Mitigation Significant No
Issues ( and Supporting Information Sources). impact Incorporated impact Imuact XII. NOISE_ would the proposal result in:
a. Eaposuto of poisous to Oi gcuciatiou of uoisc levels in oa; oss of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or F& applicable standards of other agencies?
b_ Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground - borne vibration of g otuid- bume 1ioise levels?
u. A substantial permanent mc, ease in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Old Almras Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study 19 Packet Pg. 146 Oetobe, 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Potentially
significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources): impact Incorporated Impact Impact, d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in U U A U the project viciuiry above levels existing without the project? c. Fol a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people resldmrg ur wu,king irr the project area to excessive uuise U U U A levels?
Discussion
a, b, c. There will irot be any pe,irraneiit, long term „ oise or vibration sources or impacts resulting from this project. The project prupuses to rehabilitate an exlstuig bridge to better convey traffic uri Old Alturas Road. d. inuring the construction ofthe project, there will be a temporary increase in noise in the project vicinity above existing ambient noise levels. The most noticeable construction noise will be related to pile driving operations. Pile driving will be necessary for installing H -piles duruig coiistructioii of soldier pile retaii,ing walls o„ each side of the eastern bridge app, vachcs, and fur talse work support structures. The pile diving is expected to taRRe 8 to IU days spread uut over the construction season, with periodic pile driving throughout the day. Pile driving activities will be restricted to between the hours of 1: UU a.m. and 1: 00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Other noise impacts will occur from operation of standard construction equipment such as excavators, dump trucks, loaders, delivery trucks, and other heavy equipment Back-up safety warning devices will be distinguishable truui other ambient backguund noises. Any pute, itial uuise iurpaUs due to City Public Woks Department projects are exempted by the City' s Noise Ordinance. Noise related impacts are expected to be less than significant and no mitigation measures are proposed. e, f. The proposed project will „ ut result iii any airport related impacts to pcuplc residuig or wurkuig u, the prujcct arca.

There are rru piivatc airstrips iii the vicinity ut-the project site.

Documentation
City of Redding General Plan Noise Element, 2000
City of Redding General Plan Transportation Elejj, eiit, 2000 City of Redding Zoiiiiig Ordiiiance Sectiuu 18. 4U. 1 UU Mitigation
None necessary.
r
tr Potentially
significant
Less Than
Supporting Information Sources:
aig4 fic f lion Significant No
Issues ( and Impact Incorporated' impact Impact;
Xlll. PUP U LA WN AND HU U SING. Would the proposal:
a. induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly ( tor example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for ca example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the c. Displace substantial
of replacement
numbers
housing
of people,
elsewhere?
necessitating the construction
U
u
U
u
U
u
A
A
or replacement housing elsewhere?
OldAlt., a., tc d and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabdirarion Project Initial Study 20 Packet Pg. 147 Octooer 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) llis ussiuu
a, b, u_ 1$ c prujcct will ichabiliLaic aid widcu an existing b, idge vii old Alruras Road. Thum arc uu„ c„ tly two hues of traffic on the bridge. The new bridge will also have two travel lanes and thus will not result in any increase in capacity.

No new development is proposed that is dependent on or will result from this project. the project would not induce u,iplanned population growth and does not displace substantial numbers of people or substantial numbers of existing housing.

Documentation
city of xedding cieneral Plan Housing Element, 2000
Mitigation
No„ c „ cucniniary.
r Potentially
v
Significant
Unless Less Than
Significant No
Issues and' Su ortin InformationSources. 3 in.t_ Impact Impact XIV. PUBLIC: SERVICE' S.
a. Would the project result i„ substantial adverse physical uipactb abNvciatcd with the p, ovisiou of new u, physically altered guvernmeital facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response tii,cb ur other pertuuuancc objcctivcs fur ar, y of the public nic, viucb:
1) P ire protection' s p p p C1
2) Police protection? U U U C1
3) Schools? p p p C1
4) Parks? G u u 19
5) other public facilities'! p p p ad
Discussion
a ( 1), ( 2), ( 3), ( 4), ( 5). The proposed project will not cause substantial adverse physical impacts associated with government facilities, or negatively affect fire/ police protection, schools, parks, or public facilities. The project will rehabilitate and widen a small bridge which will improve the City' s ability to maintain acceptable service ratios and maintain performance objectives.

Dumumentatlon
city of xedding Ueneral Plan Public racilities Element, 2000 Mitigation
No„ e „ ecessa, y.

Dia Aaw, m ttoua —7 ch..,,, C, eek a - d r neh., b; ht. t;v,, r, jest 1,.&.. 1 Study 21 Packet Pg. 148 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact' Incorporated Impact Impact XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial 01 physical deterio, atiu„ of the facility would ucuur ur be auuvleratcd'? b. Does the piujct; i u, uludc rcurcatluual faculties u, require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have ad an adverse physical effect on the environment',
Discussion
a, b. The prupuscd prujcci would not result In airy puicuilal lmpaLas to recreational facilities, such as parks, or require expansion or construction of new facilities.

Documentation
City of Redding General Plan Natural Resources, Recreatiuu, and Public Facilities Elements, 2000 Mitigatiuu
None necessary.

AM
1' RANSPOKI' A' 1' IUN/ CIRUULA' 1' IU. N. would the proposal:

Potentially
a_ Significant
Ll Ll lm
Potentially Unless Less Than
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Significant Mitigation, Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources' Impact Incorporated hnpact Impact XVl. 1' RANSPOKI' A' 1' IUN/ CIRUULA' 1' IU. N. would the proposal:
a. rause an iiiia case 1„ trdffiu which is substantial in relation to the existing trattit; load and capacity of the street system ( Le., result in a Ll Ll lm substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the uuu„ ty uu„ gestio„ management agency for lm designated roads or higliways7
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety C9 risks?
d. Substantially iuciease hazards due to a design feature ( e. g., sharp uu, ves o, dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses ( e. g., farm CH equipment) Y
e. Result in inadequate emergency access? C9
f Result in inadequate parking capacity? l
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, yr p, ugrams supporting alteiiiative transportation ( e. g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)'l Discussion
a, b, c, d, e, f, g. The proposed project will not cause an increase in trRTiic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and %;apavity of the street system. The project rehabilitates an existing bridge. Temporary impacts to traffic flow will occur but the impacts are considered to be less than significant. minor traffic delays are unavoidable during cu„ structiu„ i„ roadways, however, avoidance of peak traffic periods will minimize delays to the exte„ t feasible. Eiiivigei, cy access will be 01d Alturas Road and Chum Creek Badge RehaoiGtuSun r. ject initial Shay ii Packet Pg. 149 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) provided at all times. the project will not have any permanent effects on traffic flow or patterns. the project will not disrupt local traffic levels of service or result in a change in air-traffic patterns Road geometry, emergency access, and parking uapauity will rrui be atteutud by the p, ujeut. The prujcut will slot conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation.

Documentation
City of Rodding General Plan Transportatiou Element, 2000 Mitigation
None necessary.

Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues ( and Supporting Information Sources): impact incorporated impact impact XVIL UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the plupusal:
a. E.&ceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regioual Water ( Quality Control BoardY
b_ xequire or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction ofwhWh could caubc siguiticant cnviiomucnial effects?
u. Requuc u, , esu$ in the cunstructiu„ vt „ cw siu, rrr wate, drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which A could cause significant environmental effects'!
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing errtitlelllents and resources, ur are new or expanded CI crrihivinvias uccdedY
e. xesult in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve G l24 the project' s projected demand in addition to the provider' s existing 10111r111ZmG11Z5?
L Be ser vcd by a landfill with sufficient permitted uapauity to CR accommodate the project' s solid waste disposal needs'! g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? lm
Discussion
a, b, d, e. The project proposes to rehabilitate a small bridge urr old Alturas Ruud. ihcrc will be nu utte%;ib u„ ware, u, wastewater treatment systems or facilities. There are sufficient water supplies to serve construction of the project. c. The project proposes to install a new section of storm drain pipe to divert drainage from the east end of the project, which will iurpruvc cttiulcnCy of the stoma drain byAcrrl. Thu sysrrn will not be expanded and installation of the new Slu, rrr dial,, pipe will „ uI uausc slgultluani cuvuurur, cutal cftccts. t, g. the proposed project will rehabilitate an existing bridge. Most of the bridge will be left in place. Some construction debris will be generated by the project, much of which will be disposed of in the local City -operated landfill. There is sufficient permitted capacity i11 the landfill to accommodate the project_ However, standard construction specifications cquiie revyuling of some materials, suuh as stccl, tul,urCtc, and uthc, , rra[ c, ials, iu , cduue landfill wade. ' l,hruugh construction specifications, the City will ensure the project contractor complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations pertinent to recycling and disposal of solid waste.

Old Alturas Ruad and Churn Cr66ti 6riffgu RGnubititutiur# Yruject initial Study 23 Packet Pg. 150 October 2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Duuumeutxtiuu
City of Kedding General Plan Publiv EdL;1hues Ele, nrnis, 2000 water and Sewer Atlas, city of xeciding Engineering Division Mitigation
None iiecessary.

Potentially'
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact __ Impact
XVIII. MAN1uATORY Fi NluINGS OF SiGN!<r jlC" u.L.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the cnvirunment, substmiRdly reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop beluw sclfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plan[ or animal U C 0 uummunity, reduce the number ur IGstri,; t the Iailgc of a rare ur endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the maj or periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the prujcct have irnpacts that are individually Iimited, but cumulatively considerable? (" Cumulatively considerable" meds that the incrcmcritaI effects ut a prujcct are cunsidcrable when U U ER L]
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of uthcr current projects, and the effects of probable future proj ects)'!
c. Does the project have environmental eftccts which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly ur U U U 12 indirectly?
Discussion
a. The project does nut have the putentlal to degrade the quality of the environment, subsiatnlally Ieduce the habitat uf a fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife populatluns to drop bcluw self sustaining levels, eliminate a dmal communities, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a sensitive plant or animal pupuIatiun. As discussed in Scctiun V, the prujcct may have the putuntial to affect impurtant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory; however, mitigation measures will be implemented which will reduce any putentlal effects to iJ level consldered less thi l sIgnitIum—it. b. As discussed in Section III, the project could contribute to region -wide cumulative air quality impacts.

Huwcvcr, thcsc irnpacts arc considered Iess than sigrElhudalt, and uildcr pulicy of the Gencral Plan, applicatiun of standard measures will eliminate the potential for air quality impacts from this project. c. As discussed herein, the project does not have characteristics which could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly_
Documentation
See all suctIuns abuvc.

Mitigation
See Mitigation measures 1 through 4 in Section V.
vldmr., Hv. au„ aChu,.. C. cekv,; dsercehNhl; rwr: o.. r,ojeer6,; r: wlSr. dy _, a Packet Pg. 151 Oerober2016 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) 1/
ti
Shasta County, California t
1 ,
r - aro.

M,
Uri
l 1
r.
ds
RIMS
FUIVL rigure i 0 2, 000
Project Vicinity and Location Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) e
q ..
a
f.. ' 6, • '
CL
S
1 Ya
T
W
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM

OLD ALTURAS ROAD AND CHURN CREEK

BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring Program ( MMP) for the Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project. The MMP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for, and the purpose of, the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance, a key to understanding the monitoring matrix, and the monitoring matrix itself.

LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM California Public Resources Code Section 21081. 6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration ( MND). This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.

The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. It is intended to be used by City of Redding ( City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring personnel during implementation ofthe project.

Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following:

Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action.

Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude ofthe action and its implementation.

Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the impacted environment.

Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project.

Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.

The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, on-site identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff.

Mitigation Monitoring Program
Odd Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project October, 2016 Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM

MITIGATION MONITORING TABLE
The Mitigation Monitoring Table identifies the mitigation measures proposed for the project. These mitigation measures are reproduced from the Initial Study and conditions of approval for the project.

The tables have the following columns:

Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study.

Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed.

Agency/ Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure.

Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a specific mitigation measure.

NONCOMPLIANCE COMPLAINTS
Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form, providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall conduct an investigation and determine the validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take appropriate action to remedy any violation. The complainant shall receive written confirmation indicating the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue.

Mitigation Monitoring Program
Odd Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project October, 2016 Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

MITIGATION MONITORING TABLE

FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO ST SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measure Timing/ Implementation Enforcement/ Monitoring Verification
Date and
Initials)
Biological Resources
B- 1. In -water construction activities, and all pile- Construction Construction Management driving activities in Churn Creek, will be limited to
the period between June 1 and October 31, or as
may otherwise be specified through jurisdictional
permits and approvals issuedbytheNMFS, CDFW,
ACOE, and/ or RWQCB. If work is proposed
outside of the agency -approved work windows, the
City will obtain approval from those agencies prior
to conducting such work, and implement any
additional measures that may be required. In -water
pile driving will only be conducted during daytime
hours defined as beginning one- half hour after
sunrise and ending one- half hour prior to sunset, or
as defined by resource agency permits and
approvals.

B- 2. Temporary work pads or crossings within the Construction Construction Management stream will be constructed using clean, washed,
rounded gravel, 1- 4 inches in diameter, and will
meet the Caltrans gravel cleanliness specification
No. 85. Unless otherwise approved by the
Engineer, upon completion ofthe project, all gravel,
including any contaminated gravel, will be removed
from the creek bottom, except for the last 6 inches
of clean, uncontaminated gravel will be left in place
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project / October 2016 Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Mitigation Measure Timing/ Implementation Enforcement/ Monitoring Verification
Date and
Initials)
to prevent erosion and protect original streambed Construction Construction Management conditions.

B- 3. All temporary use areas will be restored to Construction Construction Management preconstruction conditions providing the same or
higher density of native woody riparian species, in
accordance with the Riparian Restoration Plan -
Old Alturas Road Bridge Rehabilitation Project at
Churn Creek. Existing woody vegetation will be
pruned at ground level prior to work and protected
during construction to allow regrowth upon
completion of the project.

B-4. Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) fencing Construction Construction Management will be placed to minimize impacts and prevent
unnecessary excursion into protected areas of the
creek.

B- 5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Construction Construction Management SWPPP) will be prepared for the project which
will outline Best Management Practices ( BMPs) for
erosion control and spill prevention.

Implementation of BMPs will minimize the
potential for adverse impacts to fish, water quality,
and the aquatic ecosystem.

B-6. Preconstruction surveys for western pond Construction Construction Management turtles will be conducted by a qualified biologist
immediately prior to the start ofin -water work each
day that in -water work occurs. Any western pond
turtles, or foothill yellow -legged frogs, eggs
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project 2 October 2016 Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Mitigation Measure Timing/ Implementation Enforcement/ Monitoring Verification
Date and
Initials)
masses, or tadpoles that are also found, will be
relocated to a safe location upstream or downstream
of the work area.

B-7. Preconstruction surveys for nesting migratory Construction Construction Management birds will be conducted if vegetation removal or
activities affecting swallow nesting on the existing
bridge occurs between March 1 and August 1. A
qualified biologist approved by the Engineer will
determine if nests are present on the bridge and if
work activities are affecting nesting. Surveys will
be conducted within 3 days prior to the proposed
work. If nesting birds are found, the nest site shall
not be disturbed until after the young have fledged.

If an active raptor nest is present, no vegetation
removal or construction activities will occur within
250 feet of the nest, unless a smaller buffer zone is
authorized by the CDFW. Appropriate buffer zones
may be established for other nesting birds by a
biologist approved by the City. The City may
utilize a variety of measures to prevent birds from
nesting on the bridge, including the use of
bioacoustic deterrents ( e. g., broadcast calls),
installation of exclusionary materials ( e. g., Teflon
or plastic sheeting or other materials that would not
entangle birds) in the winter prior to construction,
or removal ofpartially constructed nests following
confirmation by a qualified biologist that no eggs or
chicks are present ( completed nests must not be
removed).

Mitigation Monitoring Program
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project 3 October 2016 Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Mitigation Measure Timing/ Implementation Enforcement/ Monitoring Verification
Date and
Initials)
B- 8. All required permits and authorizations shall Construction Construction Management be obtained from state and federal resource agencies
prior to any construction activities within Waters of
the U.S. All terms and conditions of the required
permits and authorizations shall be met.

C- 1. Environmental Sensitive Areas ( ESA) will be Construction Construction Management established at the project site as delineated in the
ESA Action Plan, prepared for and approved by
Caltrans who has lead authority over cultural
resources pursuant to federal law.

C- 2. A qualified archaeologist and Native Construction Construction Management American will monitor excavation and initial
ground disturbing construction activities in the
portion of the APE within 100 ft of known cultural
sites, or as defined in the ESA Action Plan. If
intact cultural deposits are found, all work shall
cease in the area, and the archaeologist shall
recommend appropriate conservation measures to
be implemented prior to re- initiation of the work.

C- 3. In the event archaeological deposits are Construction Construction Management discovered during project activities anywhere on the
project site, all work in the vicinity ofthe discovery
shall be stopped immediately and the resident
engineer and archaeologist notified. The
archaeologist shall recommend appropriate
conservation measures to be implemented prior to
re-initiation of the work.

Mitigation Monitoring Program
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project 4 October 2016 Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Mitigation Measure Timing/ Implementation Enforcement/ Monitoring Verification
Date and
Initials)
C- 4. If human remains are discovered during Construction Construction Management project activities, all work will stop in the vicinity
of the find and the Shasta County Coroner' s Office
shall be notified. Treatment of the remains shall be
conducted in accordance with the direction of the
Coroner and/ or the Native American Heritage
Commission as al2prol2riate.

Mitigation Monitoring Program
Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project 5 October 2016 Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Attachment
D
Comments and Response to Comments
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) From: Oldham, Jon
To: " DARRELL BRUNELLI"
Cc: Vandiver, Corri; Bob Morrison
Subject: RE: Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Project Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11: 31: 20 AM
Hi Darrell... thanks for responding with your questions. I addressed each of them in red below.

Please don' t hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions or need clarifications on anything. We will try to answer all your questions as best we can. Once we are done with the env process in the next couple of months, then the ROW process will begin. Someone will contact you during that time to discuss the specific ROW/ easement needs of the project.

Jon
From: DARRELL BRUNELLI[ mailto: darrelllaree@sbcglobal. net] Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 6: 30 PM
To: Oldham, Jon
Subject: Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Project Thanks Jon for the link to the Mitigated Negative Declaration report. After reviewing it I have several questions.

How will the following effect our property?

catch basins along the south side of the roadway. In addition driveways will be modified. Given that the bridge will be widened from 28 ft wide to 67 feet wide, the roadway also has to be widened. It will take approx. 1000 feet to narrow the roadway down from the new width to the existing road width at the east end of the project. New sidewalks will be placed which will extend from the bridge to just short of your driveway. The drainage ditch along the side of the road will have to be regraded to drain the roadway. It will run right along your property line to the creek. Assuming that the new road width affects your driveway, either horizontally or vertically, we will reconstruct or repave your driveway up to the ROW line.

Page2 -- The project will require additional right- of- way to accommodate the new bridge and sewer line.

Temporary construction easements would also be required for construction access and staging. We do not expect to need any permanent right- of- way from you at this point in the design. We may need temporary construction easement from you in order to access the creek, but it would likely be near or within the sewer easement we have along the western edge of your property. The fence along the street does not appear to be on the ROW line so it is affected by the project, it will be removed and replaced on the ROW line.

Figure 2-- Area of Potential Effects-- The area circled within the red line includes a large portion of our property. The APE line is just a study line for purposes of the cultural surveys that were conducted. It doesn' t mean your property within the lines will be affected.

Thanks Jon, Regards
Darrell Brunelli
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) State of California — Natural Resources AgencV EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Governor DEPARTMENT OFFISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director..

Northern Region
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 96001
www. wildlife. ca. gov
November 18, 2016
Jonathan Oldham
Public Works Division
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Old Alturas Road at Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration, City of Redding State Clearinghouse Number 2016102048
Dear Mr. Oldham:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife ( CDFW) has reviewed the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the above -referenced project ( Project), City of Redding ( City), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.'
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code.

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California' s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources, and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State ( Fish & G. Code, §§ 711. 7, subd. ( a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. ( a)). CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species Id., § 1802). Similarly for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources.

CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA ( Pub. Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381). CDFW expects it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code. As proposed, the Project will be subject to CDFW' s lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority ( Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.).

CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The CEQA Guidelines are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000.

Conserving Cafifornia' s Wifdffe Since 1870
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Jonathan Oldham
City of Redding
November 18, 2016

Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in " take" as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), related authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code will be required.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City's Department of Public Works is proposing to rehabilitate and widen the existing four - span 143 -foot -long by 28 -foot -wide reinforced concrete bridge over Churn Creek on Old Alturas Road. The purpose of the Project is to widen the bridge deck, pier walls, and abutments, and widen the roadway on both approaches to the bridge. To begin the rehabilitation, temporary access roads through the riparian area and across the channel, as well as a temporary work pad in the channel, will be necessary for equipment and vehicle access. To widen Old Alturas Road, the existing abutments will be extended to 67 feet and the existing 1 - foot wide pier walls will be extended to 66 feet and ten 50400t -long 30 -inch diameter cast -in drill -holed piles will be installed to provide support for the pier extensions. Rock will be added to the channel to fill scour holes around the pier walls, and rock slope protection will be placed around the abutments and up and downstream of the new pier walls. Pile driving in the channel may be required for the placement of the falsework piles and for the installation of sheet piles around the pier walls and abutments for dewatering purposes and as temporary retaining walls. Work outside of Churn Creek includes grading and widening roadwork up to 1000 feet approaching the crossing on either side of the stream to match the new bridge deck and adding new storm drains and catchment basins to adequately drain the improved roadway. Traffic will be maintained across the existing bridge during construction, but temporary construction easements will be required for construction access and staging.

PROJECT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Mitigation Measures B- 1 and B- 2
Central Valley steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Central Valley fall -run and late fall -run Chinook Salmon ( O. tshawytscha) may be present during times of adequate flow and cool water temperature, but thermal barriers and low flow would preclude juveniles from being present during the typical instream work period of July 1- October 15. To adequately protect all salmonids, CDFW suggests modifying Mitigation Measure B- 1 to state:

The work window for any instream or percussive work will be limited to July 1 - October 15, or periods when the stream channel is not flowing disconnected pools), or when the average maximum water temperature is in excess of 25°C to avoid impacts to salmonids. if the average maximum water temperature has not exceeded 25° C by the requested instream work window, the City shall obtain approval from both National Marine Fisheries Service and CDFW. "
Temporary construction -related instream activities such as access roads, gravel work pads, and diversion pipe in the stream channel may affect habitat for fish and aquatic wildlife unless imported material is clean, washed spawning gravel and the affected reach is restored to pre -Project gradient and contours at the completion of the Project and prior to the return of high Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Jonathan Oldham
City of Redding
November 18, 2016

flows. Remaining gravel from work pads may be used to fill existing scour holes, as long as the overall stream gradient has not changed.

Mitiaation Measure B- 3
Mitigation Measure B- 3 mentions the Riparian Restoration Plan—Old Alturas Road Bridge Rehabilitation Project at Churn Creek to mitigate for temporary impacts due to the access roads and staging; however, there is no mention of permanent riparian impacts from widening the roadway and bridge by 39 feet. Elsewhere in the MND, there is discussion of permanently impacting 0. 07 acres of riparian scrub vegetation within the environmental study limits and 0. 03 acres of riparian scrub habitat temporarily impacted by the access road and work pads. The MND as well as the Riparian Restoration Plan need to include discussion of the habitat being permanently removed by the Project, as well as temporary impacts, including type and number of mature trees being removed. Additionally, the measure states, " areas will be restored to preconstruction conditions providing the same or higher density of native woody riparian species", but there is no discussion of what these species are or what the preconstruction condition is. To fully mitigate to less than significant levels and ensure no net loss in wetlands and riparian habitat due to temporary and permanent impacts, CDFW recommends a replacement ratio of 3: 1 for all permanent impacts, and the City may choose to mitigate temporary impacts at a lesser ratio, but not less than 1: 1.

The MND does not identify whether or not the onsite replanting will be monitored and maintained and does not provide success criteria for the riparian mitigation. CDFW recommends that any mitigation plantings be monitored and maintained for a period of five years following initial planting. Plants should be properly irrigated, protected from herbivores and vandalism, and kept free of invasive species during that time period. At the end of five years, plants should achieve 80 percent survival as the success criteria.

Finally, so CDFW can adequately analyze the utility of this mitigation measure, it would be useful to include the Riparian Restoration Plan as part of the document as an appendix during public review.

Mitiaation Measure B- 6
The measure states that to avoid impacts to foothill yellow -legged frogs ( Rana boylii) and western pond turtles (Actinemys marmorata), adults, tadpoles, and egg masses would be relocated if found during pre -construction surveys at the start of in -water work each day. CDFW does not recommend the relocation of amphibian egg masses, however, it is very unlikely that there will still be egg masses present if in -channel work does not occur prior to July 1.

Preconstruction surveys shall still be conducted as long as water is present, however if surveys do detect amphibian egg masses, instream work shall be delayed until the egg masses have developed into tadpoles and the tadpoles can safely be relocated to similar habitat nearby.

Mitigation Measure B- 7
CDFW recommends the removal of vegetation or other activities affecting bird nesting habitat occur outside the nesting season, generally February 1 through August 31, and not March 1 through August 1 as stated in the MND. If any special status bird species are found during preconstruction surveys during the nesting season, avoidance or mitigation measures for Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Jonathan Oldham
City of Redding
November 18, 2016

impacts should be included to avoid any significant impact to the species or its habitat.

Bats
Discussion in the MND includes potential impacts to western red bat ( Lasiurus blossevillii); however, no mitigation measures are written to address bats. CDFW recommends the addition of a mitigation measure to lessen potential significant impacts to bats and bat habitat. The measure may include similar language to the following:

Prior to habitat removal, bat surveys shall be conducted by a qualified bat biologist familiar with the bat species potentially occupying the site and their local ecology, and excluded to prevent reoccupation if that habitat feature will be permanently removed or altered. If bats are found roosting on the bridge, proper exclusion devices shall be installed to prevent roosting during bridge rehabilitation.

Bats shall not be disturbed without specific notice to and consultation with CDFW.

If any special status bat species are found, avoidance or mitigation measures for impacts should be included to avoid any significant effects to the species or its habitat. "

FILING FEES
The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/ or wildlife, and assessment of filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final ( Cal.

Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753. 5; Fish & G. Code, § 711. 4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089).

CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to provide comments during the environmental review process and assisting the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources. Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Kate Grossman, Environmental Scientist at ( 530) 225- 2239 or Katherine. grossmanPwildlife. ca.gov.

Sincerely,
Curt Babcock
Habitat Conservation Program Manager
ec: State Clearinghouse
State. clearinghouseP- opr. ca. gov
Kate Grossman, Amy Henderson, Donna L. Cobb, Rachelle Pike California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Katherine. Grossman@wildlife. ca. gov, Amy. Henderson@wildlife. ca. gov, Donna. CobbP-wildlife. ca.gov, Rachelle. Pike@wildlife. ca. gov Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER # 1
Response # 1
Work windows for the project have been addressed in Mitigation Measure B- 1. The project received concurrence from the National Marine Fisheries Service ( NMFS), the agency with jurisdiction over the federally listed species in the project area. NMFS agreed with and approved the work windows proposed. If different work windows are required in other regulatory agency permits obtained for the project, then the more restrictive windows will be implemented.

Response # 2
Comment Noted. Mitigation Measure B- 2 requires gravel used in -stream to be clean, washed spawning gravel. All gravel will be removed except approx. 6 inches of gravel will be left in the channel to protect original stream channel contours and configuration, and to protect against exposed soils that could contribute to erosion and sediment loss.

Response # 3
The Initial Study identifies under Biological Resources ( b) on Page 11 that there will be 0. 08 acres of Churn Cr (perennial stream) permanently impacted as a result of placing rock slope protection, abutments, and bridge piers, 0. 07 acres of riparian scrub vegetation permanently impacted due to the widened bridge, and 0.03 acres of riparian scrub temporarily impacted by access roads and gravel pads. The riparian scrub habitat primarily consists of young willows and Himalayan blackberry which provides moderate shade for the creek. The specific number of individual trees has not been identified at this stage of project development. Specific design details and impacts will be provided in permit applications. Such specifics will also provide the details for the restoration of the site, e. g. number and type of trees to be planted. Temporary use areas will be restored and revegetated with species growing in the same area. The revegetation effort will provide the same or a higher density of native woody riparian species when compared to pre -project conditions. The City of Redding anticipates submitting a Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration pursuant to Section 1600 et seq ofthe Fish and Game Code.

Response # 4
As stated in Mitigation Measure B- 3, the Riparian Restoration Plan for the Old Alturas Road Bridge Rehabilitation Project at Churn Creek ( Plan) outlines the plan for restoring temporary use areas at the project site. The Plan states that the site will be monitored for 3 years or until the plantings are self sufficient, and that the same or a higher density of native woody riparian species when compared to pre -project conditions will be achieved.

Response # 5
Comment noted. The Plan is available upon request.

Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) Response # 6
Comment noted. See Mitigation Measures B- 1 and B- 8.

Response # 7
The City of Redding and Caltrans believes the nesting season windows proposed are appropriate for the area given climate, latitude, seasonality, species behavior patterns, and past project approvals. If nesting birds are found, the nest site shall not be disturbed until after the young have fledged. See Mitigation Measures B- 7 and B- 8.

Response # 8
Potential project effects to the western red bat are discussed under Biological Resources in Section ( a) and ( d) on page 10. Given that there is a low potential for the bat to occur at the project site, the potential effects of the project on the bat are considered less than significant.

Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed. However, to ensure that bats are not adversely affected, a bat survey will be conducted by a qualified bat biologist prior to construction. If roosting bats are found, measures shall be prescribed by the bat biologist to ensure that bridge demolition and riparian vegetation removal do not result in take of bats. In addition, such conservation measures will be proposed in permit applications, such as the Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration pursuant to Section 1600 et seq ofthe Fish and Game Code.

Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2016- 126

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, AND APPROVING THE OLD

ALTURAS ROAD AND CHURN CREEK BRIDGE REHABILITATION

PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Redding, as lead agency for the Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project ( Project), has conducted the following environmental review for the proposed Project:

1. Environmental studies were conducted and summarized in an Initial Study dated October 18, 2016; and

2. A proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) was circulated for review and comment at the State Clearinghouse from October 20 to November 18, 2016, and with the Shasta County Clerk from October 27 to November 28, 2016; and

3. There were no substantive public comments that could not be addressed during the public comment period; and
WHEREAS, the MND identified potential significant environmental impacts which have been reduced to a less than significant level by incorporation of mitigation measures into the Project; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been written as required by the California Environmental Quality Act and is attached to the MND; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding, based upon the entire record of environmental review for the Old Alturas Road and Churn Creek Bridge Rehabilitation Project, hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and approves the project as described.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December, 2016, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: McElvain, Schreder, Sullivan, Winter, & Weaver NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ATTEST:
s/ Pamela Mize
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk
s/ Brent Weaver
BRENT WEAVER , Mayor
FORM APPROVAL:
s/ Barry E. De Walt
BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5379 Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek Bridge Widening Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the sole source procurement of hardware, software and licenses, which is estimated to cost $98,000, to enhance and upgrade the access control and video management system at the Shasta County Libraries (Redding, Anderson, and Burney) by finding that the name AMAG Symmetry CompleteView Video Management System in the specifications for Public Works projects is authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2) in order to match other products already in use by the City of Redding.

Fiscal Impact
The cost for the AMAG Symmetry CompleteView equipment is estimated to be $98,000. There is sufficient funding available in the Building Maintenance Fund from the Building Forward, Library Infrastructure Grant which the City of Redding (City) received in October 2022.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to make a finding to sole source the equipment and licensing for the AMAG Symmetry CompleteView Video Management System and provide alternative direction to staff. If alternative direction is provided, then the City will incur extra expenses and service interruptions associated with converting the system to a new vendor.

Background/Analysis
Since approximately 2007, the Redding Library has been using AMAG Symmetry Access Control. The subject upgrade involves installing the latest hardware components, as the existing components have surpassed their expected lifespan, and this will bring about enhancements to bolster the existing AMAG access control system. The AMAG CompleteView integration of onsite cameras will enable the libraries to transition their existing cameras from an unsupported consumer level product, and result in a single Software Service Agreement. This consolidation MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Make a Finding to Sole Source AMAG Symmetry CompleteView Video Management System
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 170
Report to Redding City Council November 10, 2023
Re: 4.11(e)--Make a Finding to Sole Source AMAG Symmetry CompleteView Video Management System Page 2
not only reduces ongoing costs but also enhances support and ensures better continuity among the subject matter expert support staff.

In accordance with PCC 3400(c)(2), the Council may make a finding for a material, product, or service by specific brand or trade name in order to match other products in use within the City’s Departments. Making a finding to specifically utilize AMAG Symmetry CompleteView would avoid incurring extra expenses associated with change management and guarantee uninterrupted service operation.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Packet Pg. 171

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Mayor’s recommendation to make the following appointments and reappointments to the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee:
(1) Appoint John Carelli to fill an unscheduled vacancy with a term ending November 30, 2025;
(2) Appoint Nicole Dues to fill a scheduled vacancy with a term ending November 30, 2026; (3) Reappoint Blake Fisher to serve a full-term ending November 30, 2026; and (4) Reappoint Roxanne Burke to serve a full-term ending November 30, 2026.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) Member Laural Park resigned on October 4, 2023. In accordance with the Maddy Act, a notice declaring the unscheduled vacancy was posted on the City of Redding’s website and on the public display board located at City Hall.

John Carelli has submitted an application, and if approved, his term will begin December 1, 2023, and end November 30, 2025.

CDAC Committee Member Kelsi Halvarson served two full-terms and has, therefore, reached term limits. Nicole Dues has submitted an application, and if approved, her term will begin December 1, 2023, and end November 30, 2026.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider Mayor's appointments and reappointments to the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee.

Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
Packet Pg. 172
Report to Redding City Council November 13, 2023
Re: 5.1--Mayor's appointments to Community Development Advisory Committee Page 2 Roxanne Burke and Blake Fisher both filled unscheduled vacancies from December 1, 2022, to November 30, 2023, and have expressed interest in continuing to serve. If approved, their first full terms will begin December 1, 2023, and end November 30, 2026.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Packet Pg. 173

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $8,354,960 of Encampment Resolution Funding Lookback Disbursement Round 3 (ERF-3-L) funds and adding a full-time, Housing Specialist I/II position to the Housing Division;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Development Funding Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission for maintenance improvements in an amount not to exceed $500,000;
(3) Direct staff to prepare a request for proposals for eligible scope of work items as identified on the attached Grant Expenditure Summary which includes housing case managers; interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase; and day resource center director and case manager; and prioritize the release of each request for proposal; and
(4) Determine that allocating grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fiscal Impact
The Encampment Resolution Lookback Disbursement Funding (ERF-3-L) provides $8,354,955 in grant funds to the City of Redding (City) as detailed in the California Department General Services – Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency (BCSH) Standard Agreement.

Administration and activity delivery costs of $473,455 will assist in funding associated staff contract administration costs and an additional staff person. There is no impact to the General Fund, and the ERF-3-L grant does not require matching funds.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) 3-L Award Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 174
Report to Redding City Council November 15, 2023
Re: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to give staff direction to prepare Request for Proposals (RFPs) and staff would work within the Standard Agreement and funding guidelines to implement the ERF-3-L funds. Or, Council could provide alternate direction to staff. If Council redirects funds within categories or changes a category, ERF-3-L funds may be lost or reduced by the BCSH.

Background/Analysis
On February 21, 2023, Council authorized and approved Housing Division staff to submit a grant application through the BCSH for the ERF-3-L Program. The City’s initial application was denied. However, staff revised the application with a focus on a cohesive project that provided support services to specific encampments connected to a day resource center and was awarded $8,354,955 in ERF-3-L grant funds.

On September 21, 2023, a Standard Agreement detailing the budget, scope of work, and terms and conditions of the funding was executed. The ERF-3-L grant’s intent is to provide outreach, supportive services and connection to shelter for those living in the Linden/Mercy Canyon, Progress/Technology Way Encampments (Encampments) or the Good News Rescue Mission area.

As proposed in the grant application, the City’s primary means of providing outreach and services is through the Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) officers, coupled with housing case manager services. The case managers will assist CIRT in their efforts and provide more intensive services by connecting unsheltered persons to shelter and housing options along with other community resources such as employment options, public benefits, medical or dental care or drug and alcohol abuse rehabilitation. In addition, the grant will fund sanitation support for the encampments and case managers with housing placement support assistance that includes:
deposits, application fees, and furnishings for no more than 50 people.

ERF-3-L funding also specifically provides for maintenance improvements to the Good News Rescue Mission (GNRM). These maintenance needs include a new roof, kitchen upgrade and remodel, laundry and privacy screening improvements, if the budget allows. The City Manager and staff will work with the GNRM to determine the full scope of the maintenance improvements and will negotiate a development funding agreement to set forth the terms and conditions of the grant funding and GNRM project.

Lastly, the ERF-3-L award includes funding for specific categories that include: interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase and rehabilitation; and a day resource center director and case manager to support the center for the first three years of operation. At the Council’s discretion, each one of these categories can be the subject of a request for proposal that can be drafted by staff and reviewed and approved by the Council and/or the City Manager – ERF-3-L funding allows either path for selection.

Over the last year, the City has strived to provide leadership surrounding the unsheltered crisis in our community. As such, staff has diligiently competed for grants to help the community assist this vulnerable population, but with more grants, comes more workload and responsibility. The Housing Division’s goal is to continue its level of service to the community while also providing Packet Pg. 175
Report to Redding City Council November 15, 2023
Re: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award Page 3 succession planning for three possible staff retirements within the next two years. As such, additional staff is needed to support the Housing Division’s projects, programs, and goals. Staff requests the addition of one, full-time Housing Specialist position to assist with the day-to-day administration of the Encampment grant award. With the addition of this position, the Housing Division will have 20 positions, consisting of 19.5 full-time and one ½ time employees.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. A National Environmental Policy Act review is not necessary as these are State of California and not Federal funds.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Budget Resolution
^Grant Expenditure Summary
Standard Agreement (C-10048)
Packet Pg. 176
Resolution No. 2023 - ____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 23rd AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $8,354,960 FOR ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUNDING LOOKBACK DISBURSEMENT ROUND 3 FUNDS INCLUDING A FULL-TIME HOUSING SPECIALIST I/II FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
191
191
9191

9151
State & Local Housing and
Community Development
Housing & Community
Development
$8,354,960
$0
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
191-9191-3622901-00000 State Grant Operating-Com Devel $ 8,354,960 Increase (Decrease) Expenditures
191-9191-6410604-00000 Encampment Grant ERF 3-L $ 8,354,960 191-9151-4900111-00000 Full Time Regular 35,240
191-9151-4900171-00000 Worker's Comp 1,240
191-9151-4900173-00000 Group Insurance 9,570
191-9151-4900175-00000 Retirement Program - PERS 10,630 191-9151-4900177-00000 Medicare 510
191-9151-4901885-00000 Cross Charge to State & Local HCD $ (57,190) Total $ 8,354,960 $ 8,354,960
PERSONNEL FY 2023-24
Housing Specialist I/II 1 FTE
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $8,354,960 for Encampment Resolution Funding Lookback Disbursement Round 3 funds including a Full-Time Housing Specialist I/II for fiscal year 2023-

24. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of November, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTOP, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Amount Purpose Notes
$840,000 CIRT Officers 1.6 FTE - $175k/yr - 36 months
$540,000 Case Managers 2 FTE-$90k/yr-36 months-To work alongside CIRT-Housing Case Managers $67,500 Street Outreach Supplies CIRT/Case Managers - purchases of hygeine, food, supplies, narcan $300,000 Sanitation Support Portable toilets, hand washing stations, dumpsters for 2 sites - 30 months $150,000 Housing Supports
Use by Case Managers to help get people into housing: deposits, application fees, furnishings, etc for up to 50 people
$1,764,000 Interim Housing/Motel Rooms 35 rooms for 70 people x $1400/room - 36 months $3,000,000 Day Resource Center Purchase, Rehab, startup operation costs $450,000 Director - Day Resource Center 1 FTE 36 months $270,000 Case Manager - Day Resource Center 1 FTE 36 months $500,000 Good News Rescue Mission Rehab Remodel/rehab current shelter such as roof, kitchen, laundry, privacy screening $473,455 City of Redding Staffing and overhead costs
$8,354,955
ERF 3-L Grant Expenditure Summary
Focus: Linden/Mercy Canyon and Progress/Technology Way Encampments Deadlines: 6/30/25 - 50% expended/100% obligated; 6/30/26 - 100% expended Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: ^Grant Expenditure Summary (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3- SCO ID:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA- DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES ,---------------.-----------------,

STANDARD AGREEMENT
STD 213 (Rev. 04/2020)

AGREEMENT NUMBER
23-ERF-3-L-00008
PURCHASING AUTHORITY NUMBER (If Applicable)
010725

1. This Agreement is entered into between the Contracting Agency and the Contractor named below:

CONTRACTING AGENCY NAME
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency

CONTRACTOR NAME
City of Redding

2. The term of this Agreement is:

START DATE
10/12/2023

THROUGH END DATE
3/31/2027

3. The maximum amount of this Agreement is:
$8,354,955.00 (Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Five Dollars and No Cents)

4. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits, which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement.

Exhibits Title
Exhibit A Authority, Purpose and Scope of Work
Exhibit B Budget Detail and Disbursement Provisions
Exhibit C State of California General Terms and Conditions +
Exhibit D General Terms and Conditions
-
+
Exhibit E Special Terms and Conditions
-
Items shown with an asterisk(*), are hereb y p y incor orated b reference and made p g art of this a reement as it attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at https://www.dqs.ca.gov/OLS/Resources IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES HERETO.

CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR NAME (if other than an individual, state whether a corporation, partnership, etc.) City of Redding

CONTRACTOR BUSINESS ADDRESS
777 Cypress Ave

PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING
Barry Tippin
ATTEST:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk
CITY
Redding
TITLE
City Manager
STATE
CA
Pages
6 4
1 10
2 ZIP
96001
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award) Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Standard Agreement (C-10048) (9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award)