Redding City Council
May 21, 2024

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. PUBLIC INFORMATION
All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public record upon their delivery to the City. Proposals may be reviewed by outside interested parties after all proposals received for a particular project have been reviewed and the intended awardee has been selected.

By submission of a proposal, Consultant understands and agrees that the City of Redding is subject to the California Public Records Act (Cal. Gov. Code section 62500 et seq.), and that all or part of the proposal submitted by Consultant may be subject to disclosure therein regardless of whether the proposal or part thereof is marked as proprietary. The City reserves sole discretion to determine whether disclosure is necessary under State law, and Consultant hereby releases City from all liability relating to such disclosure. City shall have no obligation to litigate the issue of disclosure under the Act on behalf of Consultant.

2. RFP ADDENDA
The City of Redding reserves the right to amend, alter, or revoke this RFP in any manner at any time. At the City’s sole discretion, modifications, clarifications, or additions will be distributed as an addendum to all known proposers. It is the responsibility of all interested parties to verify the existence of addenda (check Purchasing’s website at www.cityofredding.org/PurchasingBids or call/ email the stated City contact).

3. PROPOSAL PREPARATION COSTS
All costs incurred in the preparation and presentation of this proposal shall be wholly absorbed by the vendor.

4. PROPOSALS
All proposals will be firm for a period of ninety (90) calendar days following the required date of submission unless an alternate time frame is stated in the Request for Proposal.

5. DEVIATIONS
If there are any deviations from the specifications set forth herein, the bidder shall note the deviations in his proposal. Failure to note a deviation from the specifications may be grounds for rejection by the City of that particular proposal. Where deviations are noted, the City reserves the right to accept a proposal containing such deviations provided that, in the sole opinion of the City, the deviation or deviations so noted do not affect the overall capability of the alternative item or process proposed to perform the function for which it is to be acquired and such deviations result in lesser total cost to the City for the subject item or service.

Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: RFP 5342 - Airport Development (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center)

6. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL
Any proposer may withdraw their proposal, either personally or by written request at any time prior to the scheduled closing time for the receipt of proposals. Such requests are to be directed to the City Clerk.

7. SELECTION PROCEDURES
Proposals submitted will be subject to the City’s selection procedures for technical and/or professional consultants. Accordingly, final selection will be based upon overall capability to perform services and not exclusively upon cost of services.

The City may make any investigation it deems necessary to determine the ability of a Proposer to carry out the obligations indicated in the Request for Proposal and the submitted Proposal. At the City’s sole discretion, the Proposer shall furnish to the City all information and data for this purpose if materials submitted by, or investigation of, any Proposer fails to satisfy the City that the Proposer is properly qualified to carry out the stated obligations.

The City of Redding reserves the right to accept the proposal that is in the best interest of the City. The City’s decision shall be final.

8. RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS
The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any non-material irregularities or information in any proposal, and to accept or reject any combination of items.

9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
The award of the contract, if it is awarded, shall be made on the basis of availability of budgeted funds and to a responsible Contractor who presents the best value to the City per Redding Municipal Code 4.20.040(C).

4.20.040(C) Procure for the city the needed quality in supplies, services and equipment that prove to be the best value to the city. Determination of best value may take into consideration additional elements beyond cost such as warranty, life cycle related costs, lead time, desired aesthetics, work experience as verified through references or work examples, vendor location, prior work with the city or other factors deemed relevant by the purchasing officer in the procurement of the needed supplies, equipment or work to be performed.

10. CITY OF REDDING BUSINESS LICENSE
The awarded Vendor/Consultant may be required to obtain a City of Redding Business License per Municipal Code 6.02 – Business Licenses.

Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: RFP 5342 - Airport Development (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center)

6.02.020 It is unlawful for any person to be engaged in business in the city without having a valid license from the city to do so, in compliance with any and all regulations contained in this chapter pertaining to the business, unless the person is exempt under the provisions of this chapter. No person who is an employee, or the direct representative of a licensee, shall be required to pay a license fee for doing any part of the work of the licensee.

The selected firm shall execute an agreement with the City within ten (10) working days after notification of selection, unless the time for execution has been extended for good cause at the sole discretion of the City. Failure of the selected firm to meet contract submission requirements (e.g. insurance) or failure to timely execute an agreement with the City may result, in the sole discretion of the City, a decision to select from the remaining proposers or to call for new proposals.

Rev. 07/17/20
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: RFP 5342 - Airport Development (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Ground Lease Agreement (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center) Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: NOE Lease Agreement_Redding Jet Center (4.2(a)--Approve Lease Agreement with Redding Jet Center)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the following actions related to the Long-Term Parts, Services and Inspections Contract (C-5661) between Siemens Energy Inc. and the City of Redding for repairs at the City of Redding Power Plant:
(1) Ratify approval of Change Order 45 to Contract 5661 to complete the replacement of Generating Unit 5’s gearbox in the amount of $1,982,447; and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign any documentation or change orders necessary to finalize the project; and
(3) Find that the Change Order 45 is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

Fiscal Impact
The total Change Order No. 45 cost, including contingency, is listed below:

Description Estimated Cost
Gearset Unit $586,950
Installation Services 1,136,917
Contingency (20%) 344,773
TOTAL $2,068,640
Adequate funds are available for this change order within the City of Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Major Maintenance Fund. If Unit 5 were to remain inoperable due to the gearbox failure, the cost of replacement power for July through September 2024 would be approximately $9.6 million.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Change Order 45 to Contract 5661 with Siemens Energy to Replace Generating Unit 5's Gearbox
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 222
Report to Redding City Council May 15, 2024
Re: 4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45 Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to ratify the change order for the repair of the Unit 5 gearbox and provide alternative direction to staff. It should be noted that emergency work has begun and the City of Redding (City) would be liable for work performed to date.

Background/Analysis
Unit 5 has a power output of approximately 45 megawatts (MW) and uses waste heat recovery to produce an additional 15 MW of steam power for Generating Unit 4. The combined power generation of 60 MW accounts for approximately 30 percent of the 185-MW total capacity of the Redding Power Plant. Unit 5 is a critical resource and will be needed during the 2024 summer months to provide power to the City.

During the regular inspection of the Unit 5 gearbox in April 2024, the inspection team discovered the low-speed gear had shifted approximately 14 millimeters off of center, compromising the unit’s operability. The manufacturer of the gearset is Flender-Graffenstaden, but the parts are supplied through Siemens Energy. Siemens Energy and the manufacturer advise REU not to operate the unit in this condition. A detailed inspection of the generator began on May 6, 2024, and work to remove and replace the gearbox began on May 15, 2024.

As part of the gearbox restoration plan, the Unit 5 electrical generator will also require inspection as there is a possibility of collateral damage due to the gearbox failure. Examples of possible damage to the generator could include bearing liner damage, exciter damage, or cooling fans.

This will be assessed during the gearbox work and additional costs will be covered by the contingency.

Environmental Review
This repair is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

Attachments
C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract
Packet Pg. 223
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45) Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: C-5661 Change Oder No. 45 Siemens Contract (4.5(a)--Siemens Energy Long Term Parts Change Order 45)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve an increase of $39,638.00, from $868,863.41 to $908,501.41, to the purchase price for three underground line trucks (Trucks E440, E441, & E444) and two inspector trucks (Trucks E442 & E443) for the City of Redding Electric Utility which includes shipping from the Altec Facility in North Carolina to the City of Redding Corporation Yard.

Fiscal Impact
The acquisition of these vehicles and the first amendment to the increase in purchase price were approved by the City Council on January 17, 2023, and March 19, 2024, respectively. The City of Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Rolling Stock Fund has adequate funds to cover the additional cost of $39,638 for shipping the completed vehicles.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve the increased cost for this purchase and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On January 17, 2023, the Council approved the purchase of three Altec underground line trucks and two Altec underground inspector trucks through the Sourcewell cooperative agreement for $796,428.17. On March 19, 2024, the Council approved increasing the total purchase price for five trucks to $868,863.41 due to an increase in build costs. Shipping costs were not included in the additional increase.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.5(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(b)--Authorize an Increase to the Purchase Price for Three Altec Underground Line Trucks and Two Altec Inspector Trucks
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 247
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 4.5(b)--Approve the Second Amendment Purchase Price for REU Line and Inspector Trucks Page 2
Based on past practice, REU planned for staff to transport the vehicles from the North Carolina location to Dixon, CA for final outfitting. However, upon receiving a quote for shipping, staff has determined that shipping the vehicles is a lower cost option due to fuel costs, labor costs, and unnecessary mileage on the new trucks. Altec will transport the vehicles via flatbed trucks from the manufacturer's location in North Carolina to Altec in Dixon, CA, where additional outfitting will be done. Once the vehicles are complete, Altec will transport them to the City of Redding Corporation Yard.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Council Approved Purchase January 17, 2023
Altec Shipping Quote May 2, 2024
Council Approved Price Increase March 19, 2024
Packet Pg. 248

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the purchase of three underground line trucks and two underground inspector trucks using Sourcewell contract pricing with Altec Industries, Inc., (Altec) at a cost of $796,428.17 for Redding Electric Utility.

Fiscal Impact
The vehicle purchases were anticipated, and adequate funding is available within Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Rolling Stock Fund (balance of approximately $3.7 million as of December 31, 2022).

REU included funding for replacing all five of these vehicles in its adopted Rolling Stock Replacement Plan for the Fiscal Years 2021-23 at an estimated cost of $547,000, or approximately $250,000 less than the quoted replacement cost. Since the budgetary estimates were developed, there has been a significant industry-wide increase in pricing, resulting in replacement costs far outpacing calculations based on pre-COVID inflationary metrics. REU will likely propose increased funding for its Rolling Stock Replacement Plan as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-2025 biennial budget process. At that time, the long-term financial impacts of these, and other replacements, will be considered.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the purchase and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
REU has three underground line trucks (E440, E441, and E444) that are utilized for underground distribution line work and two underground inspector trucks (E443 and E442) that are utilized MEETING DATE: January 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.5(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(c)--Purchase of three Altec Underground Line Trucks and two Underground Inspector Trucks
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 305 Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Council Approved Purchase January 17, 2023 (4.5(b)--Approve the Second Amendment Purchase Price for REU Line and Inspector Report to Redding City Council January 9, 2023
Re: 4.5(c)--Purchase of three Altec Underground Line Trucks and two Underground Inspector Trucks Page 2
for underground inspections and repairs. These five underground trucks meet the vehicle replacement guidelines set by the City of Redding Fleet Division. The Fleet Division’s guidelines take into consideration the vehicle’s age, mileage, usage hours, and maintenance costs. The replacement of these trucks is a part of REU’s vehicle replacement plan.

Altec participates in a cooperative agreement with Sourcewell, formerly known as the National Joint Powers Alliance, as the result of a competitive bid process. In addition to being an industry standard, using the Sourcewell contract to purchase equipment saves significant staff time needed to prepare bid specifications and solicit individual quotations from vendors. The City of Redding also receives a significant price discount due to economies of scale realized through the volume of purchases on a multi-agency cooperative contract.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Altec Industries, Inc. Quote – Replacement Underground Inspector Truck Altec Industries, Inc. Quote – Replacement Underground Inspector Truck w_crane Altec Industries, Inc. Quote – Three Replacement Underground Line Trucks Rolling Stock Request - Replacement Underground Inspector Truck w_crane Rolling Stock Request - Three Replacement Underground Line Trucks Packet Pg. 306 Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Council Approved Purchase January 17, 2023 (4.5(b)--Approve the Second Amendment Purchase Price for REU Line and Inspector Quote Number: 1038050
Opportunity Number: 1652581
Sourcewell Contract #:

Date:
110421-ALT
5/2/2024

REFERENCE ALTEC MODEL
Sourcewell
Price
(A.)
1 2
3 4
(A1.)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
SOURCEWELL OPTIONS TOTAL: $0
(B.)
1 UNIT
2 UNIT & HYDRAULIC ACC
3 BODY
4 BODY & CHASSIS ACC
5 ELECTRICAL
6 FINISHING
7 CHASSIS
8 OTHER
OPEN MARKET OPTIONS TOTAL:
(C.)
1 2
3 4
BUILD LOCATION:

WARRANTY: Standard Altec Warranty for Aerials and Derricks - One (1) year parts warranty One (1) year labor warranty Ninety (90) TRADE-IN: Please ask your Altec Account Manager for more information CHASSIS: Per Altec Commercial Standard
DELIVERY: No later than _____ months ARO, FOB Customer Location TERMS: Net 30 days
BEST VALUE: Altec boasts the following "Best Value" features: Altec ISO Grip Controls for Extra Protection, Only Lifetime Warranty on Structural Components in Industry, Largest Service Network in Industry (Domestic and Overseas), Altec SENTRY Web/CD Based Training, Dedicated/Direct Gov't Sales Manager, In-Service Training with Every Order.

TO ORDER: To order, please contact the Altec Account Manager listed above. **Pricing valid for 45 days**
NOTES
PAINT COLOR: White to match chassis, unless otherwise specified Quoted by: Corbin Reavis
Altec Account Manager: Rhawnie Kraak
Phone: 707-689-6262 / Email: [email protected]
PRICING: Altec will make every effort to honor this quotation, subject to the following provisions. Prices for equipment with production start dates 12 months and beyond are budgetary only due to irregular cost inflation and market volatility. These prices will be reviewed based on market conditions and confirmed closer to the production date. Quotes and orders with chassis model year beyond the current open order bank, should be considered estimates only. Altec's turn-key pricing is subject to change in accordance with chassis pricing received from the OEM. Chassis model year, specifications and price will be reviewed and confirmed when specific model year information becomes available from the OEM and that chassis price difference will be passed through to the customer.

Altec Industries, Inc.

SOURCEWELL OPTIONS ON CONTRACT (Unit)
SOURCEWELL OPTIONS ON CONTRACT (General)
OPEN MARKET ITEMS (Customer Requested)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS (items are not included in total above) Quoted for: City of Redding (CA)
Customer Contact:

Phone: / Email:

Flatbed Driveaway Sourcewell (2 per flatbed)
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Altec Shipping Quote May 2, 2024 (4.5(b)--Approve the Second Amendment Purchase Price for REU Line and Inspector Trucks)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize price increases to the previously approved purchase price of $796,428.17 to $868,863.41 for three underground line trucks (Trucks E440, E441, & E444) and two inspector trucks (Trucks E442 & E443) for the City of Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Authorize a $54,185.58 increase for the three underground line trucks through Altec Industries, Inc. using Sourcewell contract pricing with a new net delivered cost of $473,826.36, including all applicable taxes and fees;
(2) Authorize an $18,249.66 increase for the two inspector trucks through Altec Industries, Inc. using Sourcewell contract pricing with a new net delivered cost of $395,037.05, including all applicable taxes and fees; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve future pricing adjustments, terms, and policy changes as needed up to $12,500.00 for all five vehicles.

Fiscal Impact
On January 17, 2023, the City Council (Council) approved Redding Electric Utility (REU) to purchase three underground line trucks and two underground inspector trucks at a total cost of $796,428.17. Following the order, there were modifications and changes in the Sourcewell adequate funds to cover this price increase.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to approve the increased cost for this purchase and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: March 19, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Approve the First Amendment to the Purchase Price of Three Altec Underground Line Trucks and Two Altec Inspector Trucks
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Council Approved Price Increase March 19, 2024 (4.5(b)--Approve the Second Amendment Purchase Price for REU Line and Report to Redding City Council March 8, 2024
Re: 4.5(a)--First Amendment - Increased Purchase Price of REU Line Trucks Page 2

Background/Analysis
On January 17, 2023, the Council approved the purchase of three Altec underground line trucks and two Altec underground inspector trucks through the Sourcewell Cooperative Agreement, totaling $796,428.17. Since the initial approval, there have been adjustments to the pricing of the trucks due to vendor price increases, and modifications have been requested to meet specific requirements. REU sought a conversion from gas engines to diesel engines for the three underground trucks to ensure the vehicle life coincides with planned usage, coinciding with Ford's manufacturer year model price escalation. Similarly, the two Altec underground inspector trucks experienced a price increase associated with the Ford manufacturer year model update.

Consequently, the collective adjustment for all five trucks amounts to $72,435.24.

Over the past two years, REU has observed a substantial surge in vehicle prices and extended delivery times, ranging from two to four years. Occasionally, vehicle prices for future years can experience increases in the material price. In response to these challenges, REU aims to proactively initiate vehicle orders ahead of their scheduled replacement year to ensure the continuous functionality of the fleet. REU will consistently monitor and assess the financial implications of each vehicle purchase to guarantee sufficient funding within the Rolling Stock Fund.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Altec Quote 1038048 - Updated 02-09-2024
Original Staff Report - January 17, 2023
PUR000041 - PO 115081 01-18-23 - Q1038050 - E440-E441-E444 Large Canopy - Lead Time 16-20mo
PUR000042 - PO 115082 01-18-23 - Q1038048 - E443 - Crane - Lead Time 16-20mo PUR000043 - PO 115083 01-18-23 - Q1038049 - E442 Non-Crane - Lead Time 16-20mo Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Council Approved Price Increase March 19, 2024 (4.5(b)--Approve the Second Amendment Purchase Price for REU Line and

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Mutual Threat Zone Agreement (C-1642) between the City of Redding and Cal FIRE commencing on the date both parties sign the Agreement for an auto-renewing term with the condition that the Agreement will remain in place unless terminated by a 60-day notice from the City of Redding or Cal FIRE; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact for renewing the Mutual Threat Zone (MTZ) Agreement. The Redding Fire Department (RFD) received 16,111 calls for service in 2023. Less than one percent (0.625) were calls where mutual aid was given or received.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the MTZ Agreement. If the MTZ Agreement is not renewed, the City of Redding (City) could be responsible for the cost of any resource that Cal FIRE provides during fire season, including aircraft for a wildland response.

Background/Analysis
RFD has had an MTZ Agreement with Cal FIRE for decades. The MTZ is an area surrounding the City that covers approximately one-half mile into the City limits to one-half mile outside the City limits. The MTZ Agreement includes a year-round response by both agencies to traffic collisions, fires, and wildland response. During fire season, RFD and Cal FIRE send multiple resources to any confirmed fire threatening the wildland. Year-round, each agency adds a single engine response to traffic collisions or structure fires in addition to the respective agencies’ initial response model. This provides the public with an enhanced response model that sends the closest appropriate resource to critical incidents and reduces response times.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.8(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected] SUBJECT: 4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement
Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 254
Report to Redding City Council May 15, 2024
Re: 4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement Page 2
The only change to the MTZ Agreement is Section 3D regarding the duration. The previous MTZ Agreement had a three-year term; this agreement has an evergreen clause so that the term will automatically renew each year. The agreement may be terminated with a 60-day written notice by the City or Cal FIRE. This language change has been sent to the International Association of Fire Fighters – Local 1934 (IAFF) and United Public Employees of California – Local 792 Redding Fire Management (RFMC) to indicate the language change, and no impacts were identified by either.

The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the MTZ Agreement as to form.

Environmental Review
This project is not defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety - “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to make people feel secure and safe where they live, work and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024
Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642)
Packet Pg. 255
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement) Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: ^Mutual Threat Zone - New 5.2024 (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Zone Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Mutual Threat Zone Agreement ( MTZ Agreement) with Cal FIRE for a term of three years commencing on the date both parties sign the Agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact for renewing the MTZ Agreement. It is anticipated the Redding Fire Department’ s (RFD) call for service volume may increase slightly, by approximately 12 calls per month. The expected annual fluctuation in the RFD call volume is more significant than this amount. RFD is currently down 1,235 calls over the same time last year, which equates to a 12 percent (12%) decrease in call volume. In 2019 RFD responded to 15,031 calls.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve this Agreement. If the MTZ Agreement is not renewed, the City could be responsible for the cost of any resource that Cal FIRE provides during fire season, including aircraft for a wildland response.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding Fire Department has had a Mutual Threat Zone Agreement (Agreement) with Cal FIRE for decades. The Agreement has historically provided reciprocal services for wildland fires, which has proven to be the most effective and efficient way to protect life and property in the City’s urban interface. The Mutual Threat Zone (MTZ) is an area surrounding the City that covers approximately one-half mile into the City limits to one-half mile outside the City limits. The original concept of the Agreement was to address the threats to the City and County if a grass/brush fire occurs in any of these areas by having each agency send resources when an MEETING DATE: October 6, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.8(b)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.8(b)--Consider Approval of a Mutual Threat Zone Agreement with Cal FIRE.

Jay Sumerlin, Interim Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Report to Redding City Council September 29, 2020
Re: 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone/ Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642)Page 2 incident occurred in the MTZ. The MTZ Agreement is activated at the beginning of the fire season and then suspended at the end of the fire season each year.

The current proposal expands the scope of the MTZ Agreement to include year-round response by both agencies to traffic collisions, other types of fires within the boundaries of the MTZ and wildland response. During fire season, both the City and Cal FIRE would send multiple resources to any confirmed fire threatening the wildland. Year round, each agency will add a single engine response to traffic collisions or structure fires in addition to the respective agencies’ initial response model. The purpose of the change is to provide the public with an enhanced response model that sends the closest appropriate resource to critical incidents, and reduces response times.

Operational changes required continual assessment and evaluation to determine gaps in training, policies, and tactical knowledge and operations. The City and Cal FIRE are aware of operational differences and recognize that joint training will need to be addressed as the agreement matures.

The Shield Training Center was developed to address many of the gaps in training that all fire department share. Differences in operations models, tactics and terminology can all be addressed in joint training ventures. The agreement highlights the need of the Operations Chiefs of both agencies to evaluate the MTZ Agreement Operational Plan at least annually and make changes as needed.

The City and Cal FIRE staff reviewed the proposed MTZ Agreement. The changes to the MTZ Agreement provide the most appropriate response to critical incidents within the boundaries of the MTZ, providing enhanced services to the community.

The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the MTZ Agreement as to form.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
Public Safety – “ Work to improve all aspects of public safety to make people feel secure and safe where they live, work and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
MTZ Agreement
CAL FIRE-RDN MTZ Agreement Exhibit A
CAL FIRE-RDN MTZ Agreement Map Exhibit B 5-29-11
CAL FIRE-RDN MTZ Agreement Exhibit C
CAL FIRE-RDN MTZ Agreement Exhibit D
CAL FIRE-RDN MTZ Exclusion Zone Map Exhibit E 9-21-2020 Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Exhibit “A”

OPERATING PLAN
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement A. WHO
This Operating Plan is between the City of Redding Fire Department, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CAL FIRE), Shasta-Trinity Unit and the Shasta County Fire Department (SCFD).

For the purposes of this agreement, the “Protecting Agency” shall be defined as the agency with jurisdiction and statutory responsibility of the incident, and the Supporting Agency” shall be defined as the agency providing assistance through the terms and conditions of this agreement.

B. PURPOSE OF PLAN
This Operating Plan provides the officers of both agencies with a means for executing the Mutual Threat Zone (MTZ) Agreement for resource response to fires and traffic collisions within the MTZ and is an attachment to the Agreement.

C. UTILIZATION AND RESTRICTIONS

1. Special Areas
Any special management areas: i.e., archaeological sites, for which restrictions on normal firefighting techniques apply, shall be shown on the MTZ map. Instructions regarding the modified suppression actions for each area will be included as a supplement.

2. Emergency Responses (Mutual Aid)
The resources of both agencies may be dispatched to and used on structure fires, wildland fires, vehicle fires, medical aids, rescues, public assists, fire menace standbys and hazardous material incidents. A Chief Officer will be dispatched to an incident involving mutual aid resources whenever necessary to act as an Agency Representative.

D. PROTECTION ORGANIZATION

1. Maps (See Exhibit “B”)
a. Standard map symbols will be used
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Exhibit “A” Operating Plan 2
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement b. Map will indicate the location of fire stations for both CITY and CAL FIRE/SCFD.
c. Agency protection boundaries will be shown.
d. MTZ lines (both inner and outer) will be delineated. e. Alpha Numeric Response Areas will be shown.
f. Modified suppression areas will be shown and keyed to a narrative.
g. The map shall be reviewed annually. Adjustments to the MTZ and/or protection boundaries will be made as changes become necessary and after agreement by each agencies operations Chiefs

2. COMMUNICATIONS
a. The CITY and CAL FIRE/SCFD may share radio frequencies for training, emergency incidents and joint resource operations. b. The CITY and CAL FIRE/SCFD will develop and implement a radio communications plan for any combined response within the MTZ. The resources of the supporting agency will be allowed to communicate directly with the protecting agency utilizing procedures and frequencies shown on Exhibit “C”. c. Both SHASCOM and the Redding ECC will immediately inform the other of Incidents which pose a threat within the MTZ.

Communication between these offices will occur normally by telephone through the phone numbers shown on Exhibit “D”. d. An incident Information Call Center may be established at the CAL FIRE/SCFD Redding headquarters or the City of Redding EOC on all joint responsibility fires. Representatives of the CITY and CAL FIRE/SCFD will meet, as needed, to discuss
procedures for the Information Call Center or a Joint Information Center (JIC).

The agency with the majority of the fire area and resources will provide the lead Fire Information Officer for the Center. The Center Manager may be from either agency on a mutually
acceptable basis.

Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Exhibit “A” Operating Plan 3
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement E. PROCEDURES

1. Response Areas
For the purpose of this Agreement, fires and Traffic Collisions occurring within the MTZ inside of CITY’s jurisdiction will hereinafter be described as MTZ CITY”. For fires and Traffic Collisions occurring within the MTZ inside of CAL FIRE/SCFD jurisdiction will hereinafter be described as “ MTZ COUNTY”.

Fire officials from each agency will mutually evaluate the common boundary between the CITY and CAL FIRE/SCFD protection areas. These officials will delineate an MTZ of approximately one-half to one-mile-wide, centered on the protection boundary.

The width of the MTZ may be increased or decreased, dependent upon geographical and topographical features and man-made or unusual conditions. The key function of designing an MTZ is to enable efficient dispatching of resources from both agencies and to provide rapid, coordinated suppression of wildland fires. Designating an MTZ will reduce the concern over protection boundaries during the initial attack phase of wildland fire control.

The MTZ should be further divided into response areas based on geographical features, station locations and vehicle or fire apparatus access.

2. Initial Response MTZ City Structure Fire:

Initial response and primary staging apply to normal day-to-day alarms which are usually handled by the initial assignment. The procedure for primary staging is as follows:

The first-in Engine or Truck Company will respond directly to the scene and operate to their best advantage.

The first Chief Officer will respond directly to the scene and generally place them in an effective Command position.

Consideration should always be given by first-in Engine Companies for allowing personnel of responding Truck Company(ies) which will be the most advantageous for the incident.

All other unassigned units (except in Attack Mode) will stage in their direction of travel, uncommitted, approximately one block from the scene, until assigned by the Incident Commander.

Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Exhibit “A” Operating Plan 4
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement Staged units should choose a location providing a maximum of possible tactical options with regard to: 1) access, 2) direction of travel, 3) water supply and 4) any other pertinent factors.

If an incident requires a multi-Company response and a designated Staging Area is assigned (other than multi-story structures), all responding resources will report directly to the Staging Area and report to the Staging Area Manager for assignment. Off-duty personnel will also report to the Staging Area and check in with the Staging Area Manager.

3. Initial Attack Resources – Wildland Fires, Excluding Single Engine Response:

Designated officers will review annually the plan for the numbers and types of resources to respond to areas within the given MTZ. The initial attack resource plan is as follows:

For wildland fires occurring during a “ Medium Dispatch” period which are MTZ CITY, CAL FIRE will respond;
1 CAL FIRE officer and 3 CAL FIRE Type 3 engines*
For wildland fires occurring during a “High Dispatch” period which are MTZ CITY, CAL FIRE will respond;
1 Air Attack (based on statewide availability), 1 CAL FIRE Officer, and 3 CAL FIRE Type 3 engines*
Fires occurring within CITY Response areas A430C, A430E, A430F, A430G, A430H, and A430I may include 2 CAL FIRE Type 3 engines and 1 Shasta County Fire Department (SCFD)Type 2 engine (Schedule A) based on the closest resource concept.

For wildland fires which are MTZ COUNTY, CITY will respond; 1 CITY Officer and 3 CITY engines.

4. Additional Resources for Wildland Response:

With the establishment of a unified command, single-point ordering will occur with one Incident Commander placing all request for additional resources through the Redding ECC.

Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Exhibit “A” Operating Plan 5
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement

5. All Other Type Fires – Non-Wildland, Excluding Single-Engine Response:

For fires occurring which are MTZ CITY, SCFD will respond; 1 SCFD engine and 1 Chief Officer
For fires occurring which are MTZ County, CITY will respond; 1 CITY engine and 1 CITY Officer

6. Traffic Collisions (TC’s), Excluding Single Engine Response:

For traffic collisions that are MTZ CITY, SCFD will respond; 1 SCFD engine
For traffic collisions (TC’s) that are MTZ County, CITY will respond; 1 City engine

7. Aircraft Incident – Redding Municipal Airport (Defined):

Alert 1: Aircraft with possible trouble. Pilot has not declared an emergency.

Alert 2: Aircraft with confirmed trouble. Pilot has declared an emergency.

Alert 3: Aircraft has crashed or is on fire on or near Redding Municipal Airport.

Standard response to aircraft incidents:

First Alarm
Alert 1: Single RFD Engine Response
Alert 2: 1 SCFD Engine and BC
Alert 3: 1 SCFD Engine and BC
Aircraft Fire on Ground: 1 SCFD Engine and BC
All units responding to an incident at the Redding Municipal Airport shall report to Staging Area at Station 7 via airport road to Flight Avenue unless otherwise assigned by the Incident Commander.

Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Exhibit “A” Operating Plan 6
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement

8. Move-Up and Cover:

Move up and cover may be requested by either agency. The supporting agency will make a reasonable effort to fill requests, consistent with policies of each agency. Because initial attack resources from the supporting agency are used for cover, they should be released as soon as possible. In no case shall cover resources be held beyond the 24 hour mutual aid period without consent of the supporting agency.

When CAL FIRE/SCFD or Redding Fire resources move up and cover City or CAL FIRE/SCFD fire stations, the first two hours of coverage shall be free of charge. When CAL FIRE/SCFD or Redding Fire move up and cover exceeds the free two-hour time period, reimbursement will be requested by CAL FIRE/SCFD or Redding Fire and shall be retroactive to the initial dispatch time. In order for CAL FIRE/SCFD or Redding Fire to claim reimbursement for move up and cover assignments, CAL FIRE/SCFD or Redding Fire shall submit an agency invoice which contains the date the invoice was prepared, an invoice identification number, the date the move up and cover assignment occurred, the incident name, the agency order number, the City station covered or CAL FIRE/SCFD station covered, the names of each firefighter assigned to CAL FIRE/SCFD equipment, and the duration of the move up and cover assignment. Once prepared, the invoice shall be forwarded to:

Redding Fire Department
Attention: Fire Administration
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA. 96001
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, CAL FIRE Shasta County Fire Department
875 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA. 96001
The reimbursement shall coincide with the current rates contained in the Assistance By Hire Agreement between the City and State.

9. Dispatching:

SHASCOM and the Redding ECC will be provided all the information necessary to implement the resource dispatch plan. Dispatching of resources will occur consistent with the plan, except when additional information justifies a modification.

Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat 42 42
53 6
8 73
33 56
58 1
2 52
3 5
4 43
7 32
44 A19
A16
A430
E10A
E05
A430G
A26
A580
A21
A431
E10
A421
A15
A25
A38B
A431B
E11
A14
A09
A580A
A38
A14B
G08
A101
A38A
A13
A100
A19B
A581
A430I
A10
A581B
A09A
A24C
A21B
A103
A33
A05
G13
A23
A28
A25A
A422
A14A
A21A
E10C
A29
A20
A28A
A28C
A26A
A460
A16A
E10B
A110
A31A
A102
A34
A430E
A430H
A102A
A14C
A11B
A101AA34A
A32
A420
A24D
A111
A581A
A430F
A28B
A109
A461
A423 E05A
J07A
A11
G16
A14D
J18
A18A112
A113
J18
A05B
A46C
A07A
A100A
A29A
A04
A104A
J07
RDN7
A421A
HQ
A104
44 151
273£¤ 273£¤ 2
9 9
299 5 P la
ce
rDeschutesAirportMarketOld
Alturas
VictorOl d Or egonC l e a r C r
e
e
k
L
a
k e Dersch B
y
o
le SwaseyLassen PeakHartnell Dry CreekEastsideOakS ta te H w y 2 9 9G i l
bertA
s h b y
C
o
lly
e
rHilltopCI
5Leisure
Cloverdale
StillwaterTwin ViewOasisHawthorne Iron Mountain CanyonTreat C hi n a G
u
l
c
h CascadeOri
ol
eFuzzy
Main
Diggins
LewisTexas
SpringsIntermountainOrlaElkFlowersKeswick
DamSilver
BridgeShasta
Dam
CharronQuartz
Hi
l
l
DaleB
e
n
os
n
H
appy V alleyRancho LoftusState Hwy 273Maynar dCypress Alta MesaPi tCedars
Dorvel Westsi o c k C
r e e k Dirt HaasW a lk
e
r
M
in
e
C
o
lle
g
e
V ie w Oak KnollsPortero BeatieViking
Rail
roadCh
a
parra lB
ra
ns
te tte rCour t Rio SimmonsH
a
r
l
a
n
KernBenton
Fig
Tree
LoganK
e
n
yo
kricnA
h
Hawn
AbernathyShasta ViewFawnMistletoe
RivieraRi
at aLaverne
Galaxy
North
Middle
Creek
Old
FortyFourSonora Churn
CreekBernard
DellCanbyLower SpringsDanaLost
MojoHawleyHollow Mule Town Union School
A
r
g
yle
Eureka
Hender
sonCaloma
Squaw
Grass
KnightonHill
Blue
Horse
Wix
o
nWinegardGirvanToth NealSaraFlanagans
LemaAthensPrairie
Natalie deBailey LloydCal
iforni
aCholet YanaMarleneOxfordLiber t ySacramentoBaierLoopClover AlphaMistyMeadow View Dobe HiddenGoodwaterPower
Line
ProspectDesparadoLakesideSaturn Rae
C
a
te
rp illa
rValley
CreekGold
S su
n
e
t
HelenaHilfordPachecoGarthBuenaventuraChrisPanorama
CreekADeltaBohnLillyBel Los OsosPark Ridge French
t
il
neBrowning
LivonaCherylDillard Linden
R
iv
e
rlandGoldHillDustyKislingMontanaWintu
Robledo
S
ie
r
r
aJuly
Starlight rOctoberOldElma
Oasis
WoggonLeslyeAleeEasyMaeBerkeleyOliveRocaRecord SocilleQuail ValleyRoseland1stOpa
l
W
aterlineBru
ns
w ic k Hope
Osage
MiddletonEdenSunnycrestBlack
CanyonVogtBechelliH arle yL
eig
hto
nShastaM
a
n
z
a
nOa
ks
Rob les N ic o le Howard NorthgatePa so Jewell Oak MesaAlbatrossWil l
i amsonRi dgeCharolais Frontier Wood hil
l
KroneBonnyview
M
ir
r
o
r
V
a
lle
yHidden
Oa
k s W y
n
hd
a
m
2nd
Trinity
Wa s
h
i
n
gt
o
n
DanielsRiverValley Y
u
b a
AlmaDilleyTrail
Mel
MarGordon Hendrika Lela
PasoBestCapricornH oneybeeFordSmith CheshireEcho HillElvinaOld Di ggi nsRattlesnakeBarrow
BogieLedell
Hidden Acres Vega 3rd Red BankDaut
Leonar dMagnums Falcons ViewD a
kota8thStrawberry HazelMariaB u
tte
SandisleStraussR
o
s
a
lin e Roxie Timber D e l na
o
ShastinaCaulderR
u
s
lty De M ol
Dolp
hin
Al mondSan Souci
O
a
k
T
r
e
e
Chri stianGran
d
AceroTilton MineS
o
n
o
maBakerOld IndianMetzViewWhistling
UnEl
Ca
jon
RicardoD r
e
dge
Traci Ridd
le
DrakeYanot
Lake
Redding
TaylorTaku
YokeWOx
Lassillow
e
n
View
The
West
ArmandoMaraglia
Kath
yHomasheaEdwinAlice
Pione
erM
a
csVictoriaB alato nPenny CharlesEchoFrench
Nut
TreeNedr aFigOdlePalo CedroRyanYellow Pine HillsideRancheraOak K
noll
Jone
ll
aNordon
a
AprilDeodorNew
Riders
RegalScenic
B o u l
de
r Silver W a lk e r Moody CreekFreebridgeCasa
BearGreenbrook Go ph er
CubArapaho
ThomasBurneyGravel
Plant
LuluQuai l CreekToplandBluff Melinda F oo th
illHillviewMarigoldOmegaBudLos
Palos
S e t t i n g uS
n
SurreyG
o
s
p
e
lCounter
Hi
ghl
andToro
S
is
k
i y o u W
eeksE
a
s
hts
o
re
Seven
LakesTwin
LakesOstlingKirk
El
CaminoAlamine
DebbieHaitiLago
Thompson Hiatt
Prince
BrandyCanaVirginiaCeresOrchard
EdgewoodKaiser
OliverVista
OaksArlinDemacDa
venViv ian
Fl
eetAarly
JacobsKarmaBonita
VistaAlta
SagaLittle
P
ala
Me
saButterfi
eld
Villa North
ForkChicken SpringsWendee Jurist
Cal
OreGold
Pan
G
ro
v
e
Double
KC
o
v
e
y
SummitA
n
ro
nLariat Tioga Wright Lam plit eVall
eyRowanaCarmelLa
Casa Pin e O aks Ferrolli LenaDougla
sPebblewoodNoraDuffyT
e
a
k
w
o
o
d
NewfoundEmilyChancellorEl
sEly
Tomkens
Lee
View G l e n
w
oodGreystone
L
ittle
A
cre
s
Ramb
lewood
SisKn
ob
hill
Iris
RonaCurtisRedtailMarvel SunrayRossLiethaHobo
Gib
son
RisingIffenBrundage
Treats
Phil
AlchemyC in deeEl
inL
a
an
Mi
l
l
erValley
O
akMars RegentPegs North SlopePark ElmGreen OaksEaster RedBluff Re
b e
ClaimRougeIndustrial
I5
Clover
I
e5NorthE u r
ka I- 5I5PitStillwaterDirt I- 5I- 5I- 5Old
OregonI5
I
5P
a
l
o
Ce
d
or
Eureka
B tteu
I- I5Old 5
OregonBeltl
ineL a
keQuartz
HillI- 5M
i
ddel
C
re
ek
I5G o
ldChurn CreekDorvel
NealI- 5
Eastside Middle Creek
LeonardA I5PitHa
rtnellMarketI- 5±
0 Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat July 2, 2020
Exhibit “C”

RADIO COMMUNICATIONS PLAN
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement Upon receipt of an MTZ request within either CITY or CAL FIRE/SCFD jurisdiction for a wildland incident, after each CITY resource completes their response check back with SHASCOM, all responding initial attack resources will promptly switch to the designated CAL FIRE Command frequency for command and control operations. Upon response check back of initial attack resources by the CAL FIRE ECC, the CAL FIRE ECC will assign an incident name and tactical frequency for use by all resources assigned to the MTZ incident.

MTZ wildland incident fires which occur within CITY jurisdiction that have been contained or controlled, and, all CAL FIRE/SCFD resources have been released, the CITY shall transfer communications back to SHASCOM until the termination of the incident.

All MTZ City fires (excluding wildland incidents) or traffic collisions will be assigned a City Command and Tactical frequency by SHASCOM. After each CAL FIRE/SCFD resource completes their response check back with the ECC, all responding initial attack resources will promptly switch to the designated Redding Fire Command frequency for command and control operations. CAL FIRE/SCFD units will notify SHASCOM of the location they are responding from.

The frequencies to be used on MTZ incidents are listed below.

CHANNEL NAME FREQUENCY REMARKS
Command Frequencies
CAL FIRE Local, Tone 2 151.1600 Redding (CAL FIRE ECC)
Shasta Command 154.4300 Redding (CAL FIRE ECC)
CDF 1, Tone 8 151.3550 Secondary Command Freq.

CDF 2, Tone 8 151.2650 Secondary Command Freq.

RFD F-1, Tone 8 or 4 154.3250 SHASCOM (RFD)
RFD F-2, Tone 8 or 4 154.400 SHASCOM (RFD)
Tactical Frequencies
SHU Tac 11 151.4450 Primary Tac Freq.

SHU Tac 12 151.4600 Secondary Tac Freq.

SHU Tac 09 151.3850 Secondary Tac Freq.

SCFD F-2 154.0100 Secondary Tac Freq.

SCFD F-3 153.9500 Secondary Tac Freq.

VFIRE 22 154.2650 Secondary Tac Freq.

VFIRE 23 154.2950 Secondary Tac Freq.

RFD Tac 1 154.2050 Secondary Tac Freq.

RFD Tac 2 154.2350 Secondary Tac Freq.

RFD Tac 3 154.2500 Secondary Tac Freq.

RFD Tac 4 154.3550 Secondary Tac Freq.

Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat July 23, 2020
Exhibit “D”

AGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS
CAL FIRE/SCFD, Redding City Fire Department MTZ Agreement The following telephone numbers may be used for contact between the Redding City Fire Department Dispatch (SHASCOM) and the CAL FIRE, Shasta-Trinity Unit Emergency Command Center (Redding).

SHASCOM & RFD
225-4520 SHASCOM Dispatch – Fire Pod
245-6550 SHASCOM Dispatch Supervisor
225-4141 Redding City Fire Department, Non-emergency
225-4322 Redding City Fire Department, Fax line
225-4143 On Duty BC - Office
225-4573 Redding City Fire Department Operations Chief - Office

CAL FIRE
243-1434 CAL FIRE Emergency Line
225-2411 CAL FIRE ECC, Non-emergency
225-2485 ECC Duty Officer Line
225-2418 CAL FIRE Headquarters, Non-emergency
225-2514 CAL FIRE, Fax line
225-2510 CAL FIRE, Fire Information line
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Aï
AæH
f
Aï
AæH
f
Sta.5
Sta.3
Sta.1
Sta.8
Sta.6
Sta.7
Sta.4
Sta.2
CalFire Sta.73
CalFire Sta.58
CalFire Sta. 43
A102A
A430F
A430H
J07
A28
A430E
A430H
A111
A103
A430
A430D
A430C
A24C
A100
A430I
A28A
A580
A580A
A109
A100A
A430G
A430A
A110
A112
A20
A431B
A09A
A431
A581AA13
A14AA15
A581
A21A
A25
A34
A581B
A430B
A14

BALLS FERRY RD LNHILLTOPSTINGY

DRCANYON RDC LE A RCREE KR

D S B O N N Y V IE W R HAPPYD
VALLEY

AVEQUARTZRDCYPRESS
HI

RDAIRPORTLL

RDRANCHO RDPLACER STBEAR MOUNTAIN

RDFRONTST RIVERSIDE AVECHURN

CREEK RDHAPPYVALLEY RDOX YOKE RDNORTH
STLAK

EBLVDCOURT

STPARKMARINA

DRHAWLEYRDPLACERRDE

CYPRESSAVE

BECHELLI LNS O U T HST SHASTA DAM BLVD DERSCH RD BUENAVENTURA

BLVD PARKVIEW

AVEBEARMOUNTAIN RDK ES

W I C K D A
M
RD

MARKETTRANSITIONTO CYPRESS KNIG

H TO N R DOLD OREGON TRLLAKE BLVDCANBY RDOLD ALTURAS RDO A S ISR
D
DRY
CREEK

RDCHURN
CREEK

RDDESCHUTES

RDSHASTA

VIEW DRVI
CTOR

AVEHARTNELL

AVE CANYON

AVEMEADOWDRRAILROAD
VIEWDR
BR
SAN

T E T T E R L N
IR

ON MO U N TAIN RDGRANDCOUL
EEBLVD EAST STKNIGHTON RDSUMMIT DRHWY 273CONNECTORSWEDECREEK

RDLAKESIDE

DRREDWOOD

BLVDCEDARS

RDCHURN

RDGOLDHILLS CREEK
DRE
L
R NE
O
LN

RIVIERADR
P
I
N
E
G
R
O
VE
AV

E GOODWATER AVES H A S T AST NE HAWTHORNE AVE BELTLI RDBOYLE

RDSTARDRMISTLETOE LNTWIN

VIEW BLVDCHURN RDRIDGEWOODRDWI CREEK

SCONSINAVEASHBY

RDCHURN CRE E K DR RDVICTOR

EASTSIDE RDALEXANDERAVETARMAC

RD A R GY L E R D WYNDHAM LN GOODWATER
AVEG

RA N DVIE
W
AV
E

STARLIGHTBLVD

RUPERTRDCANYO

NCREEK R D BENTON DR MARMACRDDEERCREEK RDHOLLOW LNCASCADE BLVDLOWER SPRINGS RDSOUTH ST

R O S A LIN E

A V EQUARTZ RDEHILL

BONNYVIEW

RDCASCADE

BLVDGIRVAN
RD
R
O
C
K
RC
E
EK
RD

DANA DR RIDGE DRALTA MESA DRG OL DHILLS C T TEXAS SSPRING

RD RADIO LN

BOYLERDSWASEY
DRCO

L LEG EV IE WD R SWASEY

DROAK STSH ASTAVIE WD RTEXAS SPRINGS

RDWESTSIDE RDOAK C
STN

OURTSTLITTLE

STAIRPARKDRLOMAVISTA DR

ISLANDDRCLOVERDALE THIRDSTCOLLYER DR RD
S
AC
RA M E

NT ODRMISSOURI
LNHONEYBEE RDOLD 44

DR CHINA GULCHDR EASTSIDE
RDP:\Fire\MapDocuments\ MTZ_TrafficCollisionStructureFireExclusion. mxdDate : Setempbe r22, 2020Sa cramen toR i
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat From: Members, Council
To: Kristen Schreder ; Adam McElvain; Julie Winter; Erin Resner; Michael Dacquisto Cc: Tippin, Barry; DeMaagd, Sheri; DeWalt, Barry; Mize, Pam; Tipton, Sharlene; Comments, Public; Vanlandingham, Jerrod
Subject: Fw: Agenda Item 9.8(b)- Mutual Threat Zone Agreement with CALFIRE Date: Monday, October 5, 2020 9:07:51 AM
Attachments: image003.png
image004.png
From: Comments, Public
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 9:05 AM
To: [email protected]; Comments, Public; Members, Council Cc: Steve Boero
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 9.8(b)- Mutual Threat Zone Agreement with CALFIRE Good morning:

This is confirmation that your comments have been received and will be shared with the City Council Members.

Sincerely,
Anette Cates
Executive Assistant
City Clerk’s Office
777 Cypress Avenue
P.O. Box 496071
Redding, CA 96049-6071
PHONE (530)225-4439
FAX (530)225-4463
[email protected]
City of Redding facilities have reopened to the public with new requirements to wear a mask, maintain at least six feet of social distance, and to refrain from coming into any building if you are not well. Those who are unable to meet the mask requirement will not be served in person, but can conduct business online at www.cityofredding.org, use the drop boxes located outside the facilities or contact City of Redding departments directly by phone. Some services may still Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat be limited at this time to ensure the health and safety of the public and City Staff. Thank you.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2020 8:58 PM
To: Comments, Public <[email protected]> Cc: Steve Boero <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item 9.8(b)- Mutual Threat Zone Agreement with CALFIRE CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.

Mayor & City Council:

The Tierra Oaks Homeowners Association and its' Fire Protection Committee urge approval of the revised Mutual Threat Zone (MTZ) Agreement with CALFIRE at your October 6 meeting. This agreement will extend mutual response in the MTZ to structure fires as well as wildland fires and the year around agreement will replace a former seasonal agreement. Tierra Oaks lies within the MTZ in northeast Redding.

This revised agreement is potentially very important for our homeowners. Since the Carr Fire, numerous of our homeowners have had their fire insurance cancelled and have had to scramble mightily to replace it, often at dramatically increased cost. The key issue is that the subdivision lies just over 5 miles from the nearest City of Redding fire station (No. 6 on Oasis Road). If you are over 5 miles from the nearest station, the Insurance Services Office (ISO) automatically rates your risk a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. Despite close coordination with Fire Marshal Wittner and former Chief Kreider which resulted in numerous thinning projects and tightening of our lot maintenance requirements, we have been unable to get ISO to change our rating.

With the revised MTZ Agreement, we can now legitimately claim that our responding fire station for all fires, all year is the CALFIRE station at Shasta College. That station lies about 4.2 miles from the center of the subdivision. Combined with the other work we have already done, we believe this new agreement will allow us to get our fire rating reduced. We urge you to approve it on October 6. Thank you.

Bill Carlson
Fire Committee Chairman
Tierra Oaks Estates
53-945-8876
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat From: Members, Council
To: Kristen Schreder ; Adam McElvain; Julie Winter; Erin Resner; Michael Dacquisto Cc: Tippin, Barry; DeMaagd, Sheri; Mize, Pam; Cates, Anette; Vanlandingham, Jerrod; DeWalt, Barry Subject: Fw: Agenda Item 9.8(b) Mutual Threat Zone Agreement (MTZ) - 10/6/2020 Council Agenda Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 4:20:30 PM
From: Comments, Public
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Steve Allen
Cc: Members, Council
Subject: RE: Agenda Item 9.8(b) Mutual Threat Zone Agreement (MTZ) Thank you for your comments, this has been shared with the City Council Members.

Have a great afternoon,
Sharlene Tipton
Assistant City Clerk
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
Ph 530-225-4447 / fx 530-225-4463
[email protected]
City of Redding facilities have reopened to the public with new requirements to wear a mask, maintain at least six feet of social distance, and to refrain from coming into any building if you are not well. Those who are unable to meet the mask requirement will not be served in person, but can conduct business online at www.cityofredding.org, use the drop boxes located outside the facilities or contact City of Redding departments directly by phone. Some services may still be limited at this time to ensure the health and safety of the public and City Staff. Thank you.

Original Message-----
From: Steve Allen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 3:55 PM
To: Comments, Public <[email protected]> Cc: 'Matt Oliphant ([email protected])' <[email protected]>; Mike Ham [email protected]) <[email protected]>; Rafael Ruano (rruano@goyetteassoc.com) <[email protected]>; Tippin, Barry <[email protected]>; DeMaagd, Sheri [email protected]>; Steve Allen <[email protected]> Subject: Agenda Item 9.8(b) Mutual Threat Zone Agreement (MTZ) CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.

Dear Council Members,
Please be advised that the IAFF considers revisions to the MTZ to be a meet and confer matter per MOU Article 1.9.

Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat Article 1.9 states:

1.9 The City agrees to meet and confer with the Union concerning the effect of any consolidation of Fire Services with any other jurisdiction prior to the City Council taking action on any recommended consolidation.

The MTZ clearly affects the consolidation of fire services. Please note the use of the term "any consolidation".

The meet and confer process is not yet complete. Key IAFF Officers have been on the fire lines for several weeks and unable to participate.

On behalf of the IAFF I have been directed to request this matter be pulled from the agenda until further discussions can be had. Now that the Zogg Fire is mostly contained I expect IAFF Officers will be available to participate.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Steve Allen
Labor Relations Negotiator
Goyette & Associates
530-604-4874
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 9.8(b)--Renew Mutual Threat Zone_Automatic Aid Agreement with Cal FIRE (C-1642) (4.8(a)--Mutual Threat

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and ratify submission of a grant application to the Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act Program in the amount of $155,920; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant agreement and all subsequent documents including administratively appropriating the funds, if the grant is awarded.

Fiscal Impact
This Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act (LEMHWA) Program grant does not require matching funds.

There is no negative fiscal impact in accepting this grant.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to ratify the grant application. This would prevent the Redding Police Department (RPD) from focusing additional efforts on employee mental health and wellness.

Background/Analysis
On April 30, 2024, RPD submitted a LEMHWA Program application for its 2024 funding year.

RPD requested funding from the LEMHWA Program to improve and increase their Organization Wellness Program. This would include addressing the critical needs of personnel by implementing comprehensive mental health and wellness initiatives to support the well-being of both sworn and non-sworn personnel, in the amount of $155,920.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.9(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.9(a)--Ratify Community Oriented Policing Services Grant Application and Authorize City Manager to Execute necessary documents if grant is awarded Brian Barner, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 295
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application Page 2
Over two years, the funding would allow RPD to focus on expanding mental health check-ins to sworn and non-sworn staff, providing follow-up counseling sessions as needed, enhancing their peer support and chaplain programs, and fund ongoing training. Additionally, this program would deliver wellness workshops, challenges, and family connection opportunities to promote holistic well-being. This program aims to create a supportive and resilient law enforcement agency better equipped to serve and protect the community effectively by prioritizing organizational wellness. This two-year grant would be available from October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2026.

Environmental Review
Ratifying the grant application is not a project defined by the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness
Packet Pg. 296
Project Title
Officer Wellness Grant
Federal Estimated Funding (Federal Share)
155920.0
Total Estimated Funding
155920.0
No items
Proposed Project Start Date
10/1/24
Applicant Estimated Funding (Non-Federal
Share)

0.0 Proposed Project End Date
9/30/26
Program Income Estimated Funding

0.0 Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:

C: City or Township Government
Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:
——
Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
——
Other (specify):
——
Application POC Prefix Name
——
Application POC First Name
Michele
Application POC Middle Name
R
Application POC Last Name
Davis
Application POC Suffix Name
——
Organizational Affiliation
City of Redding Police Department
Title
Management Analyst
Email ID
[email protected]
Phone Number
530-245-7145
Fax Number
——
ORINumber
——
Standard Applicant Information
Project Information
Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.) Type Of Applicant
Application Submitter Contact Information
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Is Application Subject to Review by State Under Executive Order 12372? a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on: State Review Available Date 04/25/2024
Is the Applicant Delinquent on Federal Debt?
No
Name
Form SF424_4_0-V4.0.pdf
Date Added
4/25/24
Name
Form SFLLL_2_0-V2.0.pdf
Date Added
4/25/24
Name
GrantApplication.xml
Date Added
4/25/24
Authorized Representative
Title
Police Chief
Prefix Name ——
First Name
Brian
Middle Name
——
Last Name
Barner
Suffix Name
——
Title
City Manager
Prefix Name ——
First Name
Barry
Middle Name
——
Last Name
Tippin
Suffix Name
——
Verify Legal Name, Doing Business As, and Legal Address Legal Name

CITY OF REDDING
Doing Business As
UEI
XL3JUNNVFLL9
Street 1
777 CYPRESS AVE
Street 2
City State Zip/Postal Code
Executive Order and Delinquent Debt Information
SF424 Attachments (3)
Law Enforcement Executive Information Government Executive Information Legal Addess
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) REDDING CA 96001
CongressionalDistrict
01 Country
USA
The legal name + Doing Business As (DBA) and legal address define a unique entity in the system as represented in its entity profile. The profile legal name and address is applicable to ALL applications and awards associated to this fiscal agent.

1. If this information is correct confirm/acknowledge to continue with completion of this application.

I confirm this is the correct entity.

Signer Name
Michele Davis
Certification Date / Time
04/30/2024 05:44 PM

2. If the information displayed does not accurately represent the legal entity applying for federal assistance:
a. Contact your Entity Administrator.
b. Contact the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) to update the entity legal name/address.

3. If the above information is not the entity for which this application is being submitted, Withdraw/Delete this application. Please initiate a new application in Grants.gov with using the correct UEI/SAM profile.

Law Enforcement
Municipal Police
——
Certification
Proposal Abstract
The proposed grant seeks to address critical needs within the Redding Police Department by implementing comprehensive mental health and wellness initiatives aimed at supporting the well-being of department personnel and enhancing community engagement. Over a two-year period, the project will focus on expanding mental health check-ins to all staff, providing follow-up counseling sessions as needed, and enhancing peer support and chaplain programs. Additionally, the project will deliver wellness workshops, challenges, and family connection opportunities to promote holistic well-being. Marketing efforts will include internal newsletters, a mobile app, and engagement with wellness ambassadors.

Collaboration with licensed therapists, community organizations, and faith-based communities will further enhance program effectiveness. Evaluation components will assess program impact through surveys, data analysis, and feedback mechanisms, with a year-end report detailing accomplishments and recommendations. By prioritizing officer well-being and fostering community partnerships, the project aims to create a supportive and resilient law enforcement agency better equipped to serve and protect the community effectively.

Data Requested with Application
 CPA Information
Type of Agency of Organization
Type of Agency (select one)
From the list below, please select the type of agency which best describes the applicant. Law Enforcement Entities From the list below, please select the type of agency which best describes the applicant. Non-Law Enforcement Entities Duplication Of Funding
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) ——
No
——
No
——
No, my agency will not use these COPS Office funds (if awarded) to operate an interjurisdictional criminal intelligence system. true
true
Instructions: Applicants are required to disclose whether they have pending applications for federally funded assistance or active federal awards that support the same or similar activities or services for which funding is being requested under this application. Be advised that as a general rule, COPS Office funding may not be used for the same item or service funded through another funding source. However, leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement comprehensive programs or projects is encouraged and is not seen as inappropriate. To aid the COPS Office in the prevention of awarding potentially duplicative funding, please indicate whether your agency has a pending application or an active award with any other federal funding source (e.g., direct federal funding or indirect federal funding through state sub-awarded federal funds) which supports the same or similar activities or services as being proposed in this COPS Office application.

Do you have any current, active non-COPS Office award with any other federal funding source (e.g., direct federal funding or indirect federal funding through state subawarded federal funds) that supports the same or similar activities or services as being proposed in this COPS Office application? If Yes, for each potentially duplicative non-COPS Office award, provide the following detailed information: name of federal awarding agency, or state agency for subawarded federal funding; award number; program name; award start and end dates; award amount; and description of how this project differs from the application for COPS office funding.

Do you have any pending non-COPS Office grant applications with any other federal funding source (e.g., direct federal funding or indirect federal funding through state subawarded federal funds)that support the same or similar activities or services as being proposed in this COPS Office application? If Yes, for each potentially duplicative non-COPS Office grant application, provide the following detailed information: application number (if known); program name; project length; total requested amount; items requested; and describe how this project differs from the application for COPS Office funding.

Certification of Review of 28 CFR Part23/Criminal Intelligence Certification of Review of 28 C.F.R. Part 23/Criminal Intelligence Systems: If your agency is requesting COPS Office funds for equipment or technology that will be used to operate an interjurisdictional criminal intelligence system that receives, stores, analyzes, exchanges, or disseminates data regarding ongoing criminal activities, you must agree to comply with the operating principles at 28 C.F.R Part 23. If you are requesting COPS Office funds to operate a single agency database (or other unrelated forms of technology) and will not share criminal intelligence data with other jurisdictions, 28 C.F.R. Part 23 does not apply. Please review the CPA Resource Guide for additional information. Please check one of the following, as applicable to your agency’s intended use of COPS Office funds:

Certification of Review and Representation of Compliance By checking the box, the applicant indicates he or she understands that the signatures of the Law Enforcement Executive /Program Official, Government Executive / Financial Official, and the Person Submitting this Application on the Reviews and Certifications represent to the COPS Office that: 1. the applicant will comply with all legal, administrative, and programmatic requirements that govern the applicant for acceptance and use of federal funds as outlined in the applicable COPS Office Solicitation and Resource Guides, the COPS Office award owner's manual, the DOJ Grants Financial Guide, Assurances, Certifications and all other applicable program regulations, laws, orders, and circulars; 2. the applicant understands that as a general rule COPS Office funding may not be used for the same item or service funded through another funding source; and 3. the applicant and any required or identified official partner(s) listed in this application mutually agreed to this partnership prior to submission.

Acknowledgment of Electronic Signatures
By checking the box below, the applicant indicates that he or she understands that the use of typed names in this application and the required forms, including the Assurances, Certifications, and Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form, constitute electronic signatures and that the electronic signatures are the legal equivalent of handwritten signatures. I understand
 CPA Gen Solicitation Quest
Research and Development
Instructions: For the purposes of this solicitation, R&D as defined by 2 C.F.R. §200.87 means all research activities, both basic and applied, and all development activities that are performed by nonfederal entities. The term “research” also includes activities involving the training of individuals in research techniques where such activities use the same facilities as other research and development activities and where such activities are not included in the instruction function. “Research” Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) ——
No
——
No
——
Yes
California, Eastern
——
Brian
Barner
5302254200
[email protected]
is defined as a systematic study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject studied. “Development” is the systematic use of knowledge and understanding gained from research directed toward the production of useful materials, devices, systems, or methods, including design and development of prototypes and processes. Please select “yes” if any part of your project could be considered R&D or “no” if no portion of your project would support R&D.

Could any portion of your project be considered research and development (R&D) as defined by 2 C.F.R. §200.87? Youth-Centered Project
Instructions: For the purposes of this solicitation, please select “yes” if a purpose of some or all of the activities to be carried out under the award (whether by the recipient, or a subrecipient at any tier) is to benefit a set of individuals under 18 years of age. NOTE: A special award condition will apply to all youth‐centered awards. This condition will require recipients and subrecipients to make determinations of suitability before certain covered individuals interact with participating minors under the age of 18 years old in the course of activities funded under the award.

Could any activities under your project involve interactions with minors under the age of 18 years? Training
Instructions: The COPS Office defines training as the teaching and learning activities carried out for the primary purpose of helping members of an organization other than your own acquire and apply the knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes needed by a particular job or organization. Training is driven by specific goals and objectives; it is not a single event but rather an ongoing process that requires continuous self-reflection and evaluation. Guides, webinars, articles, conference presentations, toolkits, podcasts, videos, blogs, and news feeds (to provide a few examples) can serve as support material in trainings or as standalone materials to increase knowledge, but on their own they are not defined as training by the COPS Office. Please select “yes” if any part of your project fits within the definition of training or “no” if no portion of your project fits within the definition of training.

Could any portion of your project be considered training? U.S. Attorney's District Office
Please select your U.S. Attorney’s District Office from the below drop-down options.

Law Enforcement Executive/Program Official Contact Information Please provide the name and contact information for the highest ranking Law Enforcement or Program Official and Government Executive or Financial Official for your agency or organization, please see instructions below. LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE/PROGRAM OFFICIAL This position will ultimately be responsible for the programmatic management of the award. Instructions for Law Enforcement Agencies: For law enforcement agencies, the Law Enforcement Executive is the highest ranking official in the jurisdiction (Chief of Police, Sheriff, or equivalent). Before this application can be submitted, the Entity Administrator in JustGrants must invite this individual to apply for a JustGrants account with the role of Authorized Representative, and this individual must log in to JustGrants to review the application. Instructions for Non-Law Enforcement Agencies: For non-law enforcement agencies (e.g., institutions of higher education, school districts, private organizations, etc.), the Program Official is the highest-ranking official in the jurisdiction (e.g., executive director, chief executive officer, or equivalent). Please note that information for non-executive positions (e.g., clerks, trustees) is not acceptable. Before this application can be submitted, the Entity Administrator in JustGrants must invite this individual to apply for a JustGrants account with the role of Authorized Representative, and this individual must log in to JustGrants to review the application.

First name:

Last name:

Phone:

Email address:

Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) ——
Barry
Tippin
5302254060
[email protected]
——
Michele
Davis
5302457145
[email protected]
——
High level of support
Potentially decreased impact
The proposed activities aim to address critical public safety needs by prioritizing the mental health and overall wellness of law enforcement personnel.

Firstly, implementing a wellness program for both sworn and non-sworn staff acknowledges the profound impact of mental health on officer performance. By providing holistic support, including access to licensed therapists and wellness resources, the program directly enhances officers' physical and mental well-being.

This, in turn, positively influences decision-making skills, physical capabilities, and interpersonal interactions crucial for effective law enforcement.

Moreover, an enhanced peer support program and chaplain program foster a supportive environment where officers can openly discuss mental health challenges, reducing stigma and promoting open communication. This contributes to building trust within the community by demonstrating the department's commitment to Government Executive/Financial Official Contact Information GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE/FINANCIAL OFFICIAL This position will ultimately be responsible for the financial management of the award. Please note that information for non-executive positions (e.g., clerks, trustees) is not acceptable. Instructions for Law Enforcement Agencies: For law enforcement agencies, this is the highest ranking government official within your jurisdiction (e.g., Superintendent, Mayor, City Administrator, or equivalent). Before this application can be submitted, the Entity Administrator in JustGrants must invite this individual to apply for a JustGrants account with the role of Authorized Representative, and this individual must log in to JustGrants to review the application. Instructions for Non-Law Enforcement Agencies and Non-Government Agencies: For non-law enforcement agencies, this is the financial official who has the authority to apply for this award on behalf of the applicant agency (e.g., Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, or equivalent). Please note that information for non-executive positions (e.g., clerks, trustees) is not acceptable. Before this application can be submitted, the Entity Administrator in JustGrants must invite this individual to apply for a JustGrants account with the role of Authorized Representative, and this individual must log in to JustGrants to review the application.

First name:

Last name:

Phone:

Email address:

Application Submitter Contact Information
Instructions for Application Submitter Contact: Enter the application point of contact's name and contact information.

First name:

Last name:

Phone:

Email address:

Law Enforcement and Community Policing Strategy
Instructions: The following is the COPS Office definition of community policing that emphasizes the primary components of community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving: Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime. Please refer to the COPS Office website (https://cops.usdoj.gov/RIC/ric.php?page=detail&id=COPS-P157) for further information regarding this definition and its sub-elements. Please answer the following questions regarding your community support and impact on the jurisdiction.

To what extent is there community support in your jurisdiction for implementing the proposed award activities? If awarded, to what extent will the award activities impact the other components of the criminal justice system in your jurisdiction? Explain how the proposed activities address a specific public safety need. (max 250 words) Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) transparency and addressing officers' well-being needs.

Increased training and mental health check-ins further strengthen officer resilience and service delivery capabilities. By investing in regular wellness training and providing accessible mental health check-ins, the department ensures officers remain mentally fit to serve the community effectively. This proactive approach not only prevents misconduct but also enhances community cooperation and support, ultimately contributing to improved public safety and well-being.

In summary, these initiatives align with the interconnectedness of officer well-being and public safety, illustrating how a comprehensive wellness program can empower law enforcement personnel to better serve and protect the community.

The proposed activities will play a pivotal role in reorienting law enforcement agencies towards community-oriented policing (COP) by prioritizing officer well-being and fostering stronger connections with the community.

Firstly, the wellness program for sworn and non-sworn staff signifies a shift towards a more holistic approach to policing, emphasizing the importance of mental health and overall wellness in serving the community. By investing in officers' physical and mental well-being, the agency demonstrates a commitment to COP principles, which prioritize building trust and collaboration with community members.

Enhanced peer support and chaplain programs further reinforce this commitment by creating avenues for officers to engage with community members on a personal level, fostering empathy and understanding. These programs not only provide vital support to officers but also facilitate meaningful connections with the community, contributing to the agency's involvement in COP initiatives.

Additionally, increased training on topics related to member wellness and mental health check-ins promote a proactive approach to addressing community needs.

By equipping officers with the necessary skills and resources to support community members in times of crisis, the agency demonstrates its dedication to serving as a trusted partner in the community.

In essence, by prioritizing officer well-being and strengthening community connections through comprehensive wellness initiatives, the proposed activities will effectively reorient law enforcement agencies towards a community-oriented policing approach, enhancing their involvement and commitment to building safer and more resilient communities.

The proposed wellness initiatives align with various existing governmental, community, and agency initiatives, fostering collaboration and coordination to enhance overall effectiveness.

Firstly, the existing wellness check-in program for sworn staff complements broader governmental efforts aimed at promoting officer well-being and mental health.

This program aligns with state and federal mandates advocating for comprehensive mental health support within law enforcement agencies, ensuring compliance and effectiveness.

Furthermore, the envisioned growth of the chaplain program through partnerships with faith-based communities and other community resources reflects a concerted effort to leverage external support networks. This aligns with community-driven initiatives aimed at enhancing social services and support structures for law enforcement personnel, fostering resilience and community engagement.

Additionally, collaboration with the local training facility underscores a commitment to professional development and ongoing education. This coordination aligns with state or regional training standards, ensuring that RPD's wellness initiatives are integrated seamlessly into existing training protocols and certification requirements.

Moreover, by engaging with community stakeholders and resources, such as mental health organizations or social service agencies, the proposed activities complement broader community initiatives focused on mental health advocacy and support. This collaboration strengthens community partnerships and facilitates a more holistic approach to addressing mental health challenges within law enforcement.

In summary, the proposed activities align with and complement various governmental, community, and agency initiatives, fostering collaboration and coordination to promote officer well-being and enhance community-oriented policing efforts.

The implementation of the proposed wellness activities will involve key partnerships with various community groups, private, and public agencies to ensure comprehensive support for law enforcement personnel.

Firstly, RPD's partnership with licensed community-based therapists trained in trauma resiliency and critical incident stress debriefs will provide essential mental health support. These therapists bring expertise in addressing the unique stressors and challenges faced by law enforcement officers, enhancing the effectiveness of our wellness program.

Secondly, collaboration with the faith-based community through the chaplain program will offer additional avenues for emotional and spiritual support. Chaplains, deeply rooted in the community, can provide counseling, guidance, and moral support to officers, fostering resilience and well-being.

Furthermore, leveraging technology through the Cordico Wellness app, in partnership with Lexipol, RPD's policy partner, will facilitate streamlined access to wellness resources and information. This partnership ensures that officers have convenient access to vital support services, including mental health resources and wellness training.

Additionally, engagement with Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) and participation in events such as the Cal Chiefs Women Leaders in Law Enforcement Conference and Cal Chiefs Wellness Summits, as well as, additional available trainings will strengthen RPD's commitment to officer well-being. These partnerships provide opportunities for networking, sharing best practices, and accessing resources tailored to law enforcement wellness.

In summary, the successful implementation of RPD's wellness initiatives relies on strategic partnerships with licensed therapists, faith-based communities, technology providers, policy partners, and professional organizations. By collaborating with these stakeholders, RPD can deliver comprehensive support to law enforcement personnel, promoting resilience, and enhancing overall well-being.

Explain how the proposed activities will be utilized to reorient any affected law enforcement agency's mission toward community-oriented policing or enhance its involvement in or commitment to community-oriented policing. (max 250 words) Identify any current governmental, community or agency initiatives that complement or will be coordinated with the proposed activities. (max 250 words) Identify any key community or other stakeholder partnerships (community groups, private and/or public agencies) that will play a role in the implementation of the proposed activities. (max 250words)
Describe the strategy to consult with any community groups and appropriate private and public agencies in the implementation of the proposed activities. (max 250 words) Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) The strategy to consult with community groups and appropriate private and public agencies in the implementation of the proposed activities involves a multifaceted approach aimed at fostering collaboration, gathering insights, and leveraging resources effectively.

Firstly, RPD will establish a proactive outreach plan to engage community groups, including mental health organizations, social service agencies, and faith-based communities. Through meetings, focus groups, and community forums, RPD will solicit feedback on the proposed wellness initiatives, ensuring they align with community needs and values.

Secondly, partnerships with private and public agencies, such as licensed community-based therapists, technology providers like Cordico, and law enforcement training institutions, will be leveraged to enhance program delivery and accessibility. Regular communication channels, including workshops, webinars, and collaborative meetings, will facilitate the exchange of ideas and resources to optimize program effectiveness.

Furthermore, RPD will actively involve stakeholders from Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) and participate in relevant conferences and summits, such as the Cal Chiefs Women Leaders in Law Enforcement Conference and Cal Chiefs Wellness Summits. These platforms will provide opportunities to share best practices, receive training updates, and strengthen networking connections vital for program success.

Additionally, ongoing assessment and feedback mechanisms will be implemented to ensure continuous improvement and responsiveness to community and stakeholder input. This may include surveys, focus groups, and evaluation sessions to gauge program impact and identify areas for refinement.

By employing this comprehensive strategy of consultation and collaboration with community groups, private and public agencies, and relevant stakeholders, RPD aims to develop and implement wellness initiatives that are responsive, inclusive, and effective in supporting the well-being of our law enforcement personnel and the communities they serve.

The agency faces significant financial constraints that hinder the ability to adequately address the critical need for mental health, chaplain, and peer support programs without federal assistance. Currently, the city budget operates under a substantial deficit of $5 million, placing considerable strain on existing funds allocated for essential services.

The limited funding available for mental health initiatives, chaplain programs, and peer support services restricts capacity to provide comprehensive support to law enforcement personnel. Without additional resources, the Department is unable to sustain these programs at their current state, let alone enhance or expand their capacity to meet the evolving needs of the department and community.

Federal assistance is essential to bridge the gap created by the budget deficit and ensure the continuation and improvement of vital wellness initiatives. By securing federal funding, the Department can alleviate financial burdens, allowing us to allocate resources more effectively towards mental health services, chaplain programs, and peer support initiatives.

Furthermore, federal assistance provides the opportunity to implement innovative strategies and partnerships that enhance the effectiveness and reach of the wellness programs. With federal support, the Department can invest in training, technology, and community collaborations that strengthen the ability to promote officer well-being and enhance public safety outcomes.

In summary, the agency's financial challenges, exacerbated by a significant budget deficit, underscore the critical need for federal assistance to sustain and improve mental health, chaplain, and peer support programs. Without federal funding, the Department's ability to address these essential needs is severely limited, jeopardizing the well-being of law enforcement personnel and the safety of our community. words)
Explanation of Need for Financial Assistance
All applicants are required to explain their inability to address the need for this award without federal assistance. Please do so in the space below. [Please limit your response to a maximum of 1,000 characters.]
Continuation of Support After Federal Funding Ends
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) ——
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
——
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Instructions: The questions in this section will be used for programs without a retention requirement to report any plans to continue the program or activity after the conclusion of federal funding.

Does your agency or organization plan to obtain necessary support and continue the program, project, or activity following the conclusion of federal support? Please identify the source(s) of funding that your agency plans to utilize to continue the program, project, or activity following the conclusion of federal support:General funds
Issue bonds or raise taxes
Private sources and donations
Non-federal asset forfeiture funds (subject to approval from the state or local oversight agency) State, local, or other non-federal grant funding
Fundraising efforts
Other
If “other” is selected in the above question, please provide a brief description of the source(s) of funding.  Inv Fed Prior Policing
Inventory of Federal Priorities for Policing
Does the agency have a written directive to prioritize the recruitment and hiring of personnel who are representative of the communities they are sworn to serve? Does the agency have a written directive that requires a background investigation of each candidate for officer positions conducted prior to appointment and include, consistent with the First Amendment and all applicable laws, a check of publicly available internet and information sharing sites to identify activity that promotes or supports unlawful violence or unlawful bias against persons based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability?
Does the agency have a written directive that requires the performance evaluation of all officers and supervisors to be conducted and documented at least annually, including (among other factors): a. An assessment of adherence to agency policies; andb. For supervisors, an assessment of their effectiveness in addressing misconduct by officers they supervise.

Does the agency encourage officer wellness (e.g., support for substance use disorders, mental health issues, trauma resilience, and suicide prevention) through policies and procedures?
Does the agency have a written directive that officers may use deadly force only when the officer has an objectively reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person? Does the agency have a written directive that prohibits the discharge of firearms from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances where the officer has an articulable reason for this use of deadly force?
Does the agency have a written directive that prohibits the discharge of firearms at a moving vehicle unless: a. A person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or b. The vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.

Does the agency prohibit the use of chokeholds and carotid (or vascular neck) restraints except where the use of deadly force is authorized by law? Does the agency have a written directive stating that officers should employ de-escalation techniques when possible but may use force that is objectively reasonable to accomplish lawful objectives?
Does the agency have a written directive that establishes the affirmative duty to take reasonable steps to intervene, i.e., to prevent or stop, as appropriate, any officer from engaging in excessive force or any other use of force that violates the Constitution, other laws, or agency policy on the reasonable use of force? Does the agency have a written directive that establishes the affirmative duty to take reasonable steps to request and/or render medical aid, as appropriate, where needed?
Does the agency have a written directive for officers to complete training annually on implicit bias to help address improper profiling based on the actual or perceived race, ethnicity, national origin, limited English proficiency, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability of individuals? Does the agency have a written directive establishing effective procedures for receiving, investigating, and responding to complaints alleging improper profiling or bias by law enforcement officers?
Does the agency have a written directive that establishes mechanisms for holding their officers accountable for violating policies related to use of force, which includes timely and consistent discipline if warranted and appropriate due process protections for officers? Does the agency have a written directive that limits the use of unannounced entries, often referred to as “no knock entries,” to those obtained through judicial authorization or if exigent circumstances arise at the scene such that knocking and announcing the officer's presence would create an imminent threat of physical violence to the officer and/or another person?
Does the agency currently employ body-worn cameras (BWCs) for use by all officers routinely engaged in contact with the public? If the agency employs body-worn cameras (BWCs), does the agency have a written directive on their appropriate use that is designed to ensure that BWCs are worn and activated in all appropriate circumstances, including during arrests and searches, and that BWC video footage is publicly released following incidents involving serious bodily injury or deaths in custody, where appropriate? Does the agency submit data to the FBI’s Law Enforcement Suicide Data Collection? Does the agency submit data to the FBI’s National Use of Force Data Collection? Does the agency submit data to the FBI’s Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection? Does the agency submit data to the FBI’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)? Does the agency submit data to its State Administering Agency related to deaths in custody to support the State’s compliance with the Death in Custody Reporting Act?
Does the agency check the National De-Certification Index hosted by IADLEST as a part of the officer hiring, vetting, or promotion process? Does the agency provide immediate access to mental health professionals either through mobile crisis response teams or co-responder teams, to respond to individuals experiencing a behavioral health crisis or with a disability? Does the agency have specific policies and procedures in place to ensure the independence and transparency of investigations and notifications regarding deaths in custody?
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Suburban
117
Yes
Yes
Currently, the Redding Police Department (RPD) provides a limited range of mental health and wellness services to support the well-being of staff including annual scheduled mental health check-ins, debriefing and Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) programs, trained peer counselors, chaplaincy and mental health awareness training.

With additional funding, RPD aims to enhance mental health and wellness services comprehensively. The proposed initiatives include expanding mental health check-ins to encompass all staff members, not just sworn personnel. Additionally, RPD seeks to offer additional follow-up counseling sessions as needed, providing ongoing support and intervention.

RPD intends to allocate resources towards bolstering the peer support team by providing enhanced training and resources to include specialized training in trauma resiliency and effective peer counseling techniques to better equip our team in providing meaningful support to their colleagues.

Moreover, RPD aims to strengthen the chaplain program by increasing funding, training, and resources. This will enable our chaplains to offer more robust emotional support to personnel, fostering resilience and well-being.

In addition to traditional mental health services, RPD aspires to create a holistic approach to wellness. This entails providing resources for nutrition counseling, fitness opportunities, creation of quiet rooms or onsite yoga/fitness trainers, family connection opportunities, and increased funding for electronic applications.

These initiatives aim to address the multifaceted aspects of wellness and promote a supportive and healthy environment for the staff and their families.

If awarded funding, RPD will implement a comprehensive suite of initiatives to enhance mental health and wellness services, catering to the diverse needs of RPD's personnel and fostering a culture of well-being within the department.

No
 FY24 LEMHWA Grants Elig
FY24 LEMHWA Implementation Projects Eligibility
Instructions: The following questions will be used to determine eligibility for the LEMHWA program. NOTE: If you select “no” to any of the below questions, you will be considered ineligible for the LEMHWA program and will not receive consideration for funding. Please indicate if your jurisdiction is primarily considered rural, urban, or suburban.

Enter the current number of sworn officers for your agency below.

A law enforcement agency is established and operational if the jurisdiction has passed authorizing legislation and it has a current operating budget. Based on the definition above, is your agency established and currently operational? An agency with primary law enforcement authority is defined as the first responder to calls for service for all types of criminal incidents within its jurisdiction.

Agencies are not considered to have primary law enforcement authority if they only: respond to or investigate specific type(s) of crime(s), respond to or investigate crimes within a correctional institution, serve warrants, provide courthouse security, transport prisoners, have cases referred to them for investigation or investigational support or only some combination of these. Based on the definition above, does your agency have primary law enforcement authority? [Or, if contracting to receive services, does the agency that will be providing law enforcement services have primary law enforcement authority for the population to be served?]
 FY24 LEMHWA Grant App Ques
Organizational Readiness
Please describe the current mental health and wellness services your agency provides. (e.g. Regularly scheduled mental health check-ins, On-site counseling, Offsite counseling, Virtual counseling, Debriefing and/or Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) program, Trained peer counselors, Chaplaincy / Spiritual support, Suicide prevention programming, Mental health awareness training, Mindfulness practice, Quiet room or Other). Note: An answer of no current services available is an acceptable answer. You will not be penalized. The purpose of this question is to understand your agency’s starting point. (Max 250 words) LEMHWA funding may be used for new programming, or to expand on existing mental health and wellness efforts. Please list and describe the specific activities and/or services that your agency would implement or provide if awarded funding. (Max 250 words) Project Impact and Deliverables
Will your project service multiple agencies or include regional partnerships? If yes, please list the agencies that will be impacted and/or your regional partnerships. (Max 250 words) Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) ——
178
178
No
——
The project deliverables for the grant encompass a range of tangible outcomes and activities aligned with the two-year timeline:

1. Expanded Mental Health Check-ins: Conduct regular mental health check-ins for all staff, with a goal of reaching 100% participation within the first year and maintaining ongoing check-ins thereafter.

2. Follow-Up Counseling Sessions: Provide follow-up counseling sessions as needed, aiming to deliver at least 100 sessions within the first year and adjusting based on demand and feedback.

3. Peer Support and Chaplain Program Enhancements: Train and equip peer support team members and chaplains to provide effective support to department personnel. Deliver at least four training sessions per year for both teams and host quarterly peer support group sessions.

4. Wellness Workshops and Challenges: Host at least six wellness workshops per year on topics such as stress management, resilience, nutrition, and fitness.

Organize quarterly wellness challenges to promote engagement and healthy habits.

5. Internal Newsletter and Mobile App: Launch and maintain a monthly internal newsletter dedicated to wellness updates and resources. Improve and utilize Cordico mobile app for accessing wellness resources and tracking progress.

6. Community Workshops and Events: Host community workshop on topics such as trust in the agency and satisfaction with services. Organize family connection opportunities and events quarterly to foster community engagement and support.

7. Evaluation and Reporting: Conduct ongoing evaluation of program effectiveness through surveys, feedback mechanisms, and data analysis. Prepare a comprehensive year-end report detailing program accomplishments, outcomes, and recommendations for future improvements.

With the funding received, RPD anticipates achieving several specific outcomes to enhance the well-being of personnel and improve community engagement:

1. Increased Access to Mental Health Support: Expanded mental health check-ins and follow-up counseling sessions will ensure all staff receive timely and personalized support, leading to improved mental health outcomes and reduced stress levels among personnel.

2. Strengthened Peer Support Network: Enhanced training and resources for our peer support team will result in a more robust support network, fostering a culture of peer-to-peer assistance and resilience within the department.

3. Improved Chaplain Program: Additional funding and training for our chaplain program will enhance emotional support for personnel, contributing to greater overall well-being and coping mechanisms.

4. Holistic Wellness Approach: Implementation of holistic wellness initiatives, such as nutrition counseling, fitness opportunities, and family connection activities, will promote overall wellness and work-life balance among staff.

To track and measure these outcomes, the project team will utilize a combination of internal surveys, community workshops, and data analysis:
• Internal Surveys: Regular surveys of job satisfaction, work-related stress, and utilization of mental health resources will provide insight into the effectiveness of our wellness initiatives and identify areas for improvement. • Community Workshops: Workshops on topics such as trust in the agency and community satisfaction will gauge the impact of our wellness programs on community perceptions and engagement.
• Data Analysis: Analysis of metrics such as rates of use of force incidents and employee absenteeism will help assess the effectiveness of our wellness initiatives in reducing workplace stress and improving overall performance.

By tracking these outcomes through internal surveys, community workshops, and data analysis, RPD will ensure accountability and measure the success of our efforts in promoting the well-being of personnel and strengthening community relations.

Yes
The evaluation plan will involve the following components:

Pre- and Post-Implementation Assessments: RPD will conduct baseline assessments of key metrics, such as job satisfaction, work-related stress levels, and utilization of mental health resources, before implementing the wellness initiatives. After the implementation phase, RPD will conduct follow-up assessments to measure changes and improvements in these areas.

Surveys and Feedback Mechanisms: Regular surveys will be administered to personnel to gather feedback on the perceived effectiveness of the wellness programs, satisfaction with available resources, and suggestions for improvement. Feedback mechanisms, such as suggestion boxes or anonymous reporting systems, will also be implemented to encourage open communication.

Quantitative Data Analysis: RPD will analyze quantitative data, such as rates of use of force incidents, employee absenteeism, and turnover rates, to assess the impact of the wellness initiatives on key performance indicators and organizational outcomes.

External Review: RPD may engage external consultants or evaluators to conduct independent assessments of the wellness initiatives, providing an objective i d i i i h l i
Please estimate the total number of individuals who will be eligible to receive mental health and wellness services after full implementation of this grant. If your project serves multiple agencies or a regional partnership, please include the total number of individuals eligible from all participating agencies.

Please enter the total number of employees (sworn and non-sworn) for your agency or in all agencies receiving services (if applicable).

Have you received COPS Office LEMHWA funding in either of the last two grant cycles (2022 or 2023)? If yes, please describe your project deliverable(s), specifically those that can be distributed by the COPS Office to the law enforcement field to share knowledge and experience. (e.g., a COPS publication, a Dispatch article, a Beat podcast, Model policies, tools/templates, etc.). Note: This is a new requirement for previously funded LEMHWA grantees. (Max 250 words)
If no, please describe your project deliverable(s) (e.g., number of trainings, number ot vists, number of contacts, clinician hours, policy changes, final report, Dispatch article, podcast, templates, written policy, etc.) (Max 250 words) What specific outcomes does your agency expect to accomplish with this funding and how will the project team track or measure them? (e.g. Internal survey(s) of job satisfaction, Internal survey(s) of work-related stress, Community survey(s) of topics such as trust in or satisfaction with the agency, change in rates of use of force, or Other-please describe). (Max 250 words)
Will your agency incorporate an evaluation component to your project? If yes, please describe the evaluation component your agency plans to implement. (Max 250 words) Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) perspective and ensuring rigor in the evaluation process.

Overall, the evaluation component will provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and outcomes of the wellness initiatives, guiding future decision-making and continuous improvement efforts.

The management and implementation plan for the project will involve a coordinated effort among key team members within our agency, as well as collaboration with community and stakeholder partners.

1. Chief of Police: The Chief of Police will provide overall support and leadership for the wellness program, ensuring alignment with departmental goals and priorities. They will advocate for the allocation of resources and promote a culture of wellness within the organization.

2. Patrol Captain: The Patrol Captain will oversee the overall management of the wellness program, working closely with the Peer Support/Chaplain Program Manager Lieutenant to ensure effective implementation and coordination of activities.

3. Peer Support/Chaplain Program Manager Lieutenant: This individual will serve as the primary point of contact for the peer support and chaplain programs.

Responsibilities include program management, resource allocation, coordination of trainings, and oversight of program enhancements. They will also liaise with community-based organizations and faith-based communities to strengthen partnerships and support services.

4. Peer Support Supervisors: These individuals will provide leadership and guidance to the peer support team members. Their responsibilities include organizing trainings, facilitating team development, and ensuring effective resource allocation to meet the needs of department personnel.

5. Lead Chaplain: The Lead Chaplain will oversee the day-to-day operations of the chaplain program, including scheduling, training, and coordination with the faithbased community. They will provide emotional support to department personnel and collaborate with other team members to enhance program effectiveness.

6. Licensed Therapist: The licensed therapist will collaborate with the Wellness Coordinator to facilitate mental health check-ins and follow-up appointments for all staff. They will provide counseling services and support the overall mental health and well-being of department personnel.

7. Wellness Coordinator: This individual in conjunction with the Peer Support/Chaplain Program Manager Lieutenant and Peer Support Supervisors, will coordinate all aspects of the wellness program, including physical and nutritional wellness initiatives, creation of quiet rooms, and renewal of electronic wellness applications.

They will liaise with external partners to secure trainers and equipment and ensure the successful implementation of wellness activities.

8. Peer Support Team Members: These individuals will collaborate with all staff to promote mental health wellness campaigns and deliver trainings. They will serve as peer counselors and provide support to colleagues in need.

Overall, this management and implementation plan will ensure a coordinated and comprehensive approach to wellness within our agency, leveraging the expertise of key team members and fostering partnerships with community stakeholders to support the well-being of our personnel.

Ensuring appropriate confidentiality for participants and service recipients is paramount to building trust and facilitating open communication within our wellness programs. To achieve this, we will implement several measures:

Adherence to Licensing Confidentiality Laws: The selected therapist will strictly adhere to licensing confidentiality laws, ensuring that all information discussed during sessions remains confidential. This includes maintaining confidentiality about the identity and content of discussions with participants unless there is an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others.

Informed Consent: Prior to beginning counseling sessions, participants will receive clear and comprehensive information about the limits of confidentiality and the circumstances under which information may be disclosed to the Chief of Police. Participants will provide informed consent to proceed with counseling, acknowledging their understanding of these confidentiality guidelines.

Confidentiality Agreements: All staff members involved in the administration and oversight of the wellness programs will be required to sign confidentiality agreements, affirming their commitment to maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of participants' information.

Secure Record-Keeping: Any records or documentation generated during counseling sessions will be securely stored and accessible only to authorized personnel on a need-to-know basis. Electronic records will be encrypted and password-protected to prevent unauthorized access.

Regular Training: Ongoing training and education will be provided to all staff members involved in the wellness programs to ensure awareness and adherence to confidentiality protocols. This includes training on ethical guidelines, legal requirements, and best practices for maintaining confidentiality in a therapeutic setting.

By implementing these measures, RPD will uphold the highest standards of confidentiality and privacy for participants and service recipients in the wellness programs, fostering a safe and supportive environment for seeking help and support.

RPD have identified several conferences that could be attended by staff. This include Cal Chief’s Women Leaders in Law Enforcement, Cal Chief’s Wellness Summit, International Association of Chiefs of Police Officer Safety and Wellness Conference, POST Mindfulness & Resiliency for Public Safety Personnel and First Responder Personal Health and Wellness Conference. The Department will research all possible conferences that could be attended and select the one that best fits the need of RPD.

The Department will include request funding in the City's bi-annual budget process as well as continue searching for grants. The Department will also share the importance of these programs with the community in hopes of gaining community donations. With the importance of these programs, the Department will make a priority to ensure funding is secured to main the mental health and wellness of the staff.

Management and Implementation
Describe the overall management and implementation plan for the project. This should include the key team members from your agency and any community or stakeholder partnerships (community groups, private and/or public agencies) who will support this project. Please include a detailed description of the responsibilities and role of each team member and partner. Note: A timeline of project deliverables, activities and who will complete the activities, and milestones will need to be uploaded in the “Additional Application Components” section. (Max 500 words) Please describe how you will ensure appropriate confidentiality for participants and service recipients. (Max 250 words) LEMHWA applicants are encouraged to include in their proposed budget, costs associated with attendance to a conference focused on law enforcement mental health and wellness. What mental health and wellness–related regional or national conference(s) do you plan on attending if awarded LEMHWA funding? (Max 250 words)
Please describe how these efforts will be sustained once the award ends. (Max 250 words) Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Proposal Narrative
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Sworn Officer Positions: $0.00
Civilian or Non-Sworn Personnel: $0.00
Travel: $37,920.00
Equipment: $0.00
Supplies: $0.00
SubAwards: $0.00
Procurement Contracts: $113,000.00
Other Costs: $5,000.00
Total Direct Costs: $155,920.00
Indirect Costs: $0.00
Total Project Costs: $155,920.00
Federal Funds: $155,920.00
Match Amount: $0.00
Program Income: $0.00
No documents have been uploaded for Non-Competitive Justification No documents have been uploaded for Indirect Cost Rate Agreement No documents have been uploaded for Consultant Rate Justification Name
Budget Narrative - Redding
Police Department.pdf
Category
Budget Narrative
Created by
Michele Davis
Date Added
04/29/2024
Budget and Associated Documentation

DOES THIS BUDGET CONTAIN CONFERENCE COSTS WHICH IS DEFINED BROADLY TO INCLUDE MEETINGS, RETREATS, SEMINARS, SYMPOSIA, AND TRAINING ACTIVITIES? ——
Budget and Associated Documentation
Budget Summary
Budget Category Total Cost
Budget / Financial Attachments
Non-competitive Justification
Indirect Cost Rate Agreement
Consultant Rate Justification
Additional Attachments

Base Salary and Fringe Benefits for Sworn Officer
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) List each position by title and name of employee, if available. Show the annual salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation paid for employees engaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant organization. In the narrative section, please provide a specific description of the responsibilities and duties for each position, and explain how the responsibilities and duties support the project goals and objectives outlined in your application.

Fringe benefits should be based on the actual known costs or an approved negotiated rate by a Federal Agency. If not based on an approved negotiated rate, list the composition of the fringe benefit package. Fringe benefits are for the personnel listed in Personnel budget category listed and only for the percentage of time devoted to the project. In the narrative section, please provide a specific description for each item Itemize travel expenses of staff personnel (e.g. staff to training, field interviews, advisory group meeting, etc.). Describe the purpose of each travel expenditure in reference to the project objectives. Show the basis of computation (e.g., six people to 3-day training at $X airfare, $X lodging, $X subsistence). In training projects, travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the location of travel, if known; or if unknown, indicate "location to be determined." Indicate whether applicant's formal written travel policy or the Federal Travel Regulations are followed. Note: Travel expenses for consultants should be included in the “Consultant Travel” data fields under the “Subawards (Subgrants)/Procurement Contracts” category. For each Purpose Area applied for, the budget should include the estimated cost for travel and accommodations for two staff to attend two three-day long meetings, with one in Washington D.C. and one in their region, with the exception of Purpose Area 1, which should budget for one meeting in Washington D.C, and Purpose Areas 6 and 7, which should budget for 3 meetings within a 3 year period, with 2 in Washington D.C, and 1 within their region. All requested information must be included in the budget detail worksheet and budget narrative.

No items
Personnel Total Cost
$0
Additional Narrative
No items
Fringe Benefits Total Cost
$0
Additional Narrative
Personnel
Instructions
Year 1
Year 1
Personnel Detail
Name Position Salary Rate Time
Worked
Percentage
of Time (%)
Total
Cost
Fringe Benefits
Instructions
Year 1
Fringe Benefit Detail
Name Base Rate (%) Total Cost
Travel
Instructions
Year 1
Travel Detail
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) List non-expendable items that are to be purchased (Note: Organization’s own capitalization policy for classification of equipment should be used). Expendable items should be included in the “Supplies” category Applications should analyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leasing equipment, especially high cost items and those subject to rapid technological advances. Rented or leased equipment costs should be listed in the “Contracts” data fields under the “Sub awards” (Sub grants)/Procurement Contracts” category. In the budget narrative, explain how the equipment is necessary for the success In the budget narrative, explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project, and describe the procurement method to be used. All requested information must be included in the budget detail worksheet and budget narrative.

List items by type (office supplies, postage, training materials, copy paper, and expendable equipment items costing less than $5,000, such as books, hand held tape recorders) and show the basis for computation. Generally, supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project. All requested information must be included in the budget detail worksheet and budget narrative.

Conference/Training Undetermined Other N/A $500.00 1.00 10.00 2.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Conference/Trainng Undetermined Lodging Night $200.00 3.00 10.00 2.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Conference/Training Undetermined Meals Day $74.00 4.00 10.00 2.00 $5,920.00 $5,920.00 Conference/Training Undetermined Transportation RoundTrip $500.00 1.00 10.00 2.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Travel Total Cost
$37,920
Additional Narrative
No items
Equipment Total Cost
$0
No items
Purpose of
Travel
Location Type of
Expense
Basis Cost Quantity # Of
Staff
# Of
Trips
Total Cost Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
The proposal is to send peer support and key members of the wellnes team to training and conferences. At this time, it is has not been determined exactly what staff will be attending. The expense of other is for the cost of the conferences.

Equipment
Instructions
Year 1
Equipment Detail
Equipment
Item
# of
Items
Cost Total
Cost
Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
Supply Items
Instructions
Year 1
Supply Item Detail
Purpose of
Supply Items
# of
Items Unit Cost Total Cost
Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) As a rule, construction costs are not allowable. In some cases, minor repairs or renovations may be allowable. Consult with the DOJ grant-making component before budgeting funds in this category. In the narrative section, please provide a specific description for each item, and explain how the item supports the project goals and objectives outlined in your application.

Subawards (see "Subaward" definition at 2 CFR 200.92) : Provide a description of the Federal Award activities proposed to be carried out by any subrecipient and an estimate of the cost (include the cost per subrecipient, to the extent known prior to the application submission). For each subrecipient, enter the subrecipient entity name, if known.

Please indicate any subaward information included under budget category Subawards (Subgrants) Contracts by including the label "(subaward)" with each subaward category.

Supplies Total Cost
$0
No items
Construction Total Cost
$0
No items
Subawards Total Cost
$0
Add Consultant Travel
——
Construction
Instructions
Year 1
Construction Detail
Purpose of
Construction
Description
of Work
# of
Items
Cost Total
Cost
Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
Subawards
Instructions
Year 1
Subaward (Subgrant) Detail
Description Purpose Consultant Country State/U.S.

Territory
City Total
Cost
Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
Procurement contracts (see “Contract” definition at 2 CFR 200.22): Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cost. Indicate whether the applicant’s formal, written Procurement Policy or the Federal Acquisition Regulation is followed. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding procurement contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole source procurements in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold set in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908 (currently set at $250,000) for prior approval. Please provide a specific description for each item, and explain how the item supports the project goals and objectives outlined in your application. Consultant Fees: For each consultant enter the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (8-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Unless otherwise approved by the COPS Office, approved consultant rates will be based on the salary a consultant receives from his or her primary employer. Consultant fees in excess of $650 per day require additional written justification, and must be pre-approved in writing by the COPS Office if the consultant is hired via a noncompetitive bidding process.

Please provide a specific description for each item, and explain how the item supports the project goals and objectives outlined in your Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Procurement contracts (see “Contract” definition at 2 CFR 200.1): Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cost.

Indicate whether the applicant’s formal, written Procurement Policy or the Federal Acquisition Regulation is followed. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding procurement contracts. A separate justification must be provided for noncompetitive procurements in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold set in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908 (currently set at $250,000).

Consultant Fees: For each consultant enter the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (8-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Written prior approval and additional justification is required for consultant fees in excess of the DOJ grant-making component's threshold for an 8-hour day.

In the narrative section, please provide a specific description for each item, and explain how the item supports the project goals and objectives outlined in your application.

List items (e.g., rent, reproduction, telephone, janitorial or security services, and investigative or confidential funds) by type and the basis of the computation. For example, provide the square footage and the cost per square foot for rent, or provide a monthly rental cost and how many months to rent. All requested information must be included in the budget detail worksheet and budget narrative.

Cordico
Subscription
annual renewal of
Cordico app for
wellness services
No United States California Redding $18,000.00 $18,000.00 Fitness Coaching
funds to provide
fitness/nutrition
services
No United States California Redding $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Wellness Check-in
and Follow ups
Contract with
Licenses
Therapist
No United States California Redding $85,000.00 $85,000.00 Do you need Consultant Travel?
No
Procurement Cost
$113,000
Additional Narrative
Family Connections 1.00 each $5,000.00 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Other Costs Total Cost
$5,000
Additional Narrative
p p p , p pp p j g j y
application. Please visit https://cops.usdoj.gov/grants for a list of allowable and unallowable costs for this program.

Instructions
Year 1
 Procurement Contract Detail
Description Purpose Consultant Country State/U.S.

Territory
City Total
Cost
Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
These budget items are the contracts anticipated for the grant.

1. The amount of for wellness checks is at a rate of $150 per hour and would allow for approximately 565 hours of services. 2 $10,000 for fitness coaching would allow for providing nutritional counseling or personal training for staff to ensure they are taking care of the physical health as well as their mental health.

3. Currently, the Department utilizes the Cordico app to provide staff with health and wellness information on their phones. $18,000 would provide an additional year of the app.

Other Direct Costs
Instructions
Year 1
Other Cost Detail
Description Quantity Basis Costs
Length
of
Time
Total Costs Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
RPD would like to hold family connection events to provide support for staff's family. At this time, it is unknown what the actual cost will be.

Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Indirect costs are allowed only if: a) the applicant has a current, federally approved indirect cost rate; or b) the applicant is eligible to use and elects to use the “de minimis” indirect cost rate described in 2 C.F.R. 200.414(f). (See paragraph D.1.b. in Appendix VII to Part 200—States and Local Government and Indian Tribe Indirect Cost Proposals for a description of entities that may not elect to use the “de minimis” rate.) An applicant with a current, federally approved indirect cost rate must attach a copy of the rate approval, (a fully-executed, negotiated agreement). If the applicant does not have an approved rate, one can be requested by contacting the applicant’s cognizant Federal agency, which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization, or if the applicant’s accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the direct costs categories. (Applicant Indian tribal governments, in particular, should review Appendix VII to Part 200—States and Local Government and Indian Tribe Indirect Cost Proposals regarding submission and documentation of indirect cost proposals.) All requested information must be included in the budget detail worksheet and budget narrative. In order to use the “de minimis” indirect rate an applicant would need to attach written documentation to the application that advises DOJ of both the applicant’s eligibility (to use the “de minimis” rate) and its election. If the applicant elects the de minimis method, costs must be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs, but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. In addition, if this method is chosen then it must be used consistently for all federal awards until such time as the applicant entity chooses to negotiate a federally approved indirect cost rate.

Upload
The recommended files to upload are PDF, Microsoft Word and Excel.

No documents have been uploaded for Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and Other Supportive Documents No items
Indirect Costs Total Cost
$0
Additional Narrative
Name
Lt Regan Resume.pdf
Category
Curriculum Vitae or Resumes
Created by
Michele Davis
Date Added
04/30/2024
Name
2024 Chief Brian Barner
Resume.pdf
Category
Curriculum Vitae or Resumes
Created by
Michele Davis
Date Added
04/30/2024
N d t h b l d d f L tt f S t
Indirect Costs
Instructions
Year 1
Indirect Cost Detail
Description Base
Indirect
Cost
Rate Total Cost
Non-Federal
Contribution
Federal
Request
Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and Other Supportive Documents Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and Other Supportive Documents Additional Application Components
Curriculum Vitae or Resumes


Letters of Support
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Name
Form SFLLL_2_0-V2.0.pdf
Category
LobbyingActivitiesDisclosure
Created by
——
No. [Applicant Name on SF-424] does not have (and is not proposed as a subrecipient under) any pending applications submitted within the last 12 months for federally funded grants or cooperative agreements (or for subawards under federal grants or cooperative agreements) that request funding to support the same project being proposed in this application to OJP and that would cover any identical cost items outlined in the budget submitted as part of this application.

No documents have been uploaded for Letters of Support
No documents have been uploaded for Additional Attachments Additional Attachments
Disclosures and Assurances
Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items
DOJ Certified Standard Assurances
OMB APPROVAL NUMBER 1121-0140
EXPIRES 05/31/2019
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

CERTIFIED STANDARD ASSURANCES
On behalf of the Applicant, and in support of this application for a grant or cooperative agreement, I certify under penalty of perjury to the U.S. Department of Justice ("Department"), that all of the following are true and correct:
(1) I have the authority to make the following representations on behalf of myself and the Applicant. I understand that these representations will be relied upon as material in any Department decision to make an award to the Applicant based on its application. (2) I certify that the Applicant has the legal authority to apply for the federal assistance sought by the application, and that it has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay any required non-federal share of project costs) to plan, manage, and complete the project described in the application properly.
(3) I assure that, throughout the period of performance for the award (if any) made by the Department based on the application-- a. the Applicant will comply with all award requirements and all federal statutes and regulations applicable to the award; b. the Applicant will require all subrecipients to comply with all applicable award requirements and all applicable federal statutes and regulations; and c. the Applicant will maintain safeguards to address and prevent any organizational conflict of interest, and also to prohibit employees from using their positions in any manner that poses, or appears to pose, a personal or financial conflict of interest. (4) The Applicant understands that the federal statutes and regulations applicable to the award (if any) made by the Department based on the application specifically include statutes and regulations pertaining to civil rights and nondiscrimination, and, in addition-- a. the Applicant understands that the applicable statutes pertaining to civil rights will include section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d); section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794); section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681); and section 303 of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. § 6102);
b. the Applicant understands that the applicable statutes pertaining to nondiscrimination may include section 809(c) of Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. § 10228(c)); section 1407(e) of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (34 U.S.C. § 20110(e)); section 299A(b) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 (34 U.S.C. § 11182(b)); and that the grant condition set out at section 40002(b)(13) of the Violence Against Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Please Acknowledge
Signed
SignerID
[email protected]
Signing Date / Time
4/29/24 9:19 PM
Just ce a d e que cy e e t o ct o 00 (3 U S C § 8 (b)); a d t at t e g a t co d t o set out at sect o 000 (b)( 3) o t e o e ce ga st Women Act (34 U.S.C. § 12291(b)(13)), which will apply to all awards made by the Office on Violence Against Women, also may apply to an award made otherwise;
c. the Applicant understands that it must require any subrecipient to comply with all such applicable statutes (and associated regulations); and d. on behalf of the Applicant, I make the specific assurances set out in 28 C.F.R. §§ 42.105 and 42.204. (5) The Applicant also understands that (in addition to any applicable program-specific regulations and to applicable federal regulations that pertain to civil rights and nondiscrimination) the federal regulations applicable to the award (if any) made by the Department based on the application may include, but are not limited to, 2 C.F.R. Part 2800 (the DOJ "Part 200 Uniform Requirements") and 28 C.F.R. Parts 22 (confidentiality - research and statistical information), 23 (criminal intelligence systems), 38 (regarding faith-based or religious organizations participating in federal financial assistance programs), and 46 (human subjects protection). (6) I assure that the Applicant will assist the Department as necessary (and will require subrecipients and contractors to assist as necessary) with the Department's compliance with section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (54 U.S.C. § 306108), the Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1974 (54 U.S.C. §§ 312501-312508), and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4335), and 28 C.F.R. Parts 61 (NEPA) and 63 (floodplains and wetlands).
(7) I assure that the Applicant will give the Department and the Government Accountability Office, through any authorized representative, access to, and opportunity to examine, all paper or electronic records related to the award (if any) made by the Department based on the application. (8) If this application is for an award from the National Institute of Justice or the Bureau of Justice Statistics pursuant to which award funds may be made available (whether by the award directly or by any subaward at any tier) to an institution of higher education (as defined at 34 U.S.C. § 10251(a)(17)), I assure that, if any award funds actually are made available to such an institution, the Applicant will require that, throughout the period of performance-- a. each such institution comply with any requirements that are imposed on it by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and b. subject to par. a, each such institution comply with its own representations, if any, concerning academic freedom, freedom of inquiry and debate, research independence, and research integrity, at the institution, that are included in promotional materials, in official statements, in formal policies, in applications for grants (including this award application), for accreditation, or for licensing, or in submissions relating to such grants, accreditation, or licensing, or that otherwise are made or disseminated to students, to faculty, or to the general public. (9) I assure that, if the Applicant is a governmental entity, with respect to the award (if any) made by the Department based on the application-- a. it will comply with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655), which govern the treatment of persons displaced as a result of federal and federally-assisted programs; and b. it will comply with requirements of 5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328, which limit certain political activities of State or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by federal assistance. (10) If the Applicant applies for and receives an award from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), I assure that as required by 34 U.S.C. § 10382(c)(11), it will, to the extent practicable and consistent with applicable law--including, but not limited to, the Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act--seek, recruit, and hire qualified members of racial and ethnic minority groups and qualified women in order to further effective law enforcement by increasing their ranks within the sworn positions, as provided under 34 U.S.C. § 10382(c)(11). (11) If the Applicant applies for and receives a DOJ award under the STOP School Violence Act program, I assure as required by 34 U.S.C. § 10552(a)(3), that it will maintain and report such data, records, and information (programmatic and financial) as DOJ may reasonably require.

I acknowledge that a materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement (or concealment or omission of a material fact) in this certification, or in the application that it supports, may be the subject of criminal prosecution (including under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and/or 1621, and/or 34 U.S.C. §§ 10271-10273), and also may subject me and the Applicant to civil penalties and administrative remedies for false claims or otherwise (including under 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730 and 3801-3812). I also acknowledge that the Department's awards, including certifications provided in connection with such awards, are subject to review by the Department, including by its Office of the Inspector General.

DOJ Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements; Law Enforcement and Community Policing
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS; LAW

ENFORCEMENT AND COMMUNITY POLICING
Applicants should refer to the regulations and other requirements cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations or other cited requirements before completing this form. The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the U.S. Department of Justice (“Department”) determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.

1. LOBBYING
As required by 31 U.S.C. § 1352, as implemented by 28 C.F.R. Part 69, the Applicant certifies and assures (to the extent applicable) the following:
(a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Applicant, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal grant or cooperative agreement;
(b) If the Applicant’s request for Federal funds is in excess of $100,000, and any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the Applicant shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities” in accordance with its (and any DOJ awarding agency’s) instructions; and (c) The Applicant shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subgrants and procurement contracts (and their subcontracts) funded with Federal award funds and shall ensure that any certifications or lobbying disclosures required of recipients of such subgrants and procurement contracts (or their subcontractors) are made and filed in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1352.

2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS A. Pursuant to Department regulations on nonprocurement debarment and suspension implemented at 2 C.F.R. Part 2867, and to other related requirements, the Applicant certifies, with respect to prospective participants in a primary tier “covered transaction,” as defined at 2 C.F.R. § 2867.20(a), that neither it nor any of its principals-- (a) is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) has within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law, or been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against it for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, tribal, or local) transaction or private agreement or transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion or receiving stolen property, making false claims, or obstruction of justice, or commission of any offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects its (or its principals’) present responsibility; (c) is presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, tribal, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification; and/or (d) has within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, tribal, or local) terminated for cause or default.

B. Where the Applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, it shall attach an explanation to this application. Where the Applicant or any of its principals was convicted, within a three-year period preceding this application, of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law, the Applicant also must disclose such felony criminal conviction in writing to the Department (for OJP Applicants, to OJP at [email protected]; for OVW Applicants, to OVW at [email protected]; or for COPS Applicants, to COPS at [email protected]), unless such disclosure has already been made.

3. FEDERAL TAXES
A. If the Applicant is a corporation, it certifies either that (1) the corporation has no unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability, or (2) the corporation has provided written notice of such an unpaid tax liability (or liabilities) to the Department (for OJP Applicants, to OJP at [email protected]; for OVW Applicants, to OVW at [email protected]; or for COPS Applicants, to COPS at [email protected]).

B. Where the Applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, it shall attach an explanation to this application.

4. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, as implemented at 28 C.F.R. Part 83, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 28 C.F.R. §§ 83.620 and 83.650:

A. The Applicant certifies and assures that it will, or will continue to, provide a drug-free workplace by-- (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in its workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to inform employees about-- (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(2) The Applicant’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the award be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the award, the employee will-- Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Please Acknowledge
Certified
SignerID
[email protected]
Signing Date / Time
4/29/24 9:19 PM
(1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(2) Notify the employer in writing of the employee’s conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction;
(e) Notifying the Department, in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title of any such convicted employee to the Department, as follows:

For COPS award recipients - COPS Office, 145 N Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20530; For OJP and OVW award recipients - U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 810 7th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531.

Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected award; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
(1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; and
(g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f).

5. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAMS (“SAFE POLICING CERTIFICATION”) If this application is for a discretionary award pursuant to which award funds may be made available (whether by the award directly or by any subaward at any tier) to a State, local, college, or university law enforcement agency, the Applicant certifies that any such law enforcement agency to which funds will be made available has been certified by an approved independent credentialing body or has started the certification process. To become certified, a law enforcement agency must meet two mandatory conditions:
(a) the agency’s use of force policies adhere to all applicable federal, State, and local laws; and (b) the agency’s use of force policies prohibit chokeholds except in situations where use of deadly force is allowed by law.

For detailed information on this certification requirement, see https://cops.usdoj.gov/SafePolicingEO .

The Applicant acknowledges that compliance with this safe policing certification requirement does not ensure compliance with federal, state, or local law, and that such certification shall not constitute a defense in any federal lawsuit. Nothing in the safe policing certification process or safe policing requirement is intended to be (or may be) used by third parties to create liability by or against the United States or any of its officials, officers, agents or employees under any federal law. Neither the safe policing certification process nor the safe policing certification requirement is intended to (or does) confer any right on any third-person or entity seeking relief against the United States or any officer or employee thereof. No person or entity is intended to be (or is) a third-party beneficiary of the safe policing certification process, or, with respect to the safe policing certification requirement, such a beneficiary for purposes of any civil, criminal, or administrative action.

6. COORDINATION REQUIRED UNDER PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMMUNITY POLICING PROGRAMS As required by the Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Act of 1994, at 34 U.S.C. § 10382(c)(5), if this application is for a COPS award, the Applicant certifies that there has been appropriate coordination with all agencies that may be affected by its award. Affected agencies may include, among others, Offices of the United States Attorneys; State, local, or tribal prosecutors; or correctional agencies.

I acknowledge that a materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement (or concealment or omission of a material fact) in this certification, or in the application that it supports, may be the subject of criminal prosecution (including under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and/or 1621, and/or 34 U.S.C. §§ 10271-10273), and also may subject me and the Applicant to civil penalties and administrative remedies for false claims or otherwise (including under 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730 and 3801-3812). I also acknowledge that the Department’s awards, including certifications provided in connection with such awards, are subject to review by the Department, including by its Office of the Inspector General.

Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Other Disclosures and Assurances
No documents have been uploaded for Other Disclosures and Assurances Please Acknowledge
Signed
SignerID
[email protected]
Signing Date / Time
4/29/24 9:46 PM
No documents have been uploaded for Other
Certified
Declaration and Certification to the U.S. Department of Justice as to this Application Submission By [taking this action], I --

1. Declare the following to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), under penalty of perjury: (1) I have authority to make this declaration and certification on behalf of the applicant; (2) I have conducted or there was conducted (including by the applicant’s legal counsel as appropriate, and made available to me) a diligent review of all requirements pertinent to and all matters encompassed by this declaration and certification.

2. Certify to DOJ, under penalty of perjury, on behalf of myself and the applicant, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the following are true as of the date of this application submission: (1) I have reviewed this application and all supporting materials submitted in connection therewith (including anything submitted in support of this application by any person on behalf of the applicant before or at the time of the application submission and any materials that accompany this declaration and certification); (2) The information in this application and in all supporting materials is accurate, true, and complete information as of the date of this request; and (3) I have the authority to submit this application on behalf of the applicant.

3. Declare the following to DOJ, under penalty of perjury, on behalf of myself and the applicant: (1) I understand that, in taking (or not taking) any action pursuant to this declaration and certification, DOJ will rely upon this declaration and certification as a material representation; and (2) I understand that any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent information or statement in this declaration and certification (or concealment or omission of a material fact as to either) may be the subject of criminal prosecution (including under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and/or 1621, and/or 34 U.S.C. §§ 10271-10273), and also may subject me and the applicant to civil penalties and administrative remedies under the federal False Claims Act (including under 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730 and/or §§ 3801-3812) or otherwise.

Other
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application)

10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant:

9. Award Amount, if known:
$
* Street 1
* City State Zip
Street 2
* Last Name
Prefix * First Name Middle Name
Suffix

DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C.1352 OMB Number: 4040-0013 Expiration Date: 02/28/2025

1. * Type of Federal Action:
a. contract
b. grant
c. cooperative agreement
d. loan
e. loan guarantee
f. loan insurance

2. * Status of Federal Action:
a. bid/offer/application
b. initial award
c. post-award

3. * Report Type:
a. initial filing
b. material change

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity:

Prime SubAwardee
* Name City of Redding Police Department
* Street 1 777 Cypress Avenue Street 2
* City Redding State Zip 96001
Congressional District, if known:

5. If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

6. * Federal Department/Agency:

Department of Justice, Office of COPS

7. * Federal Program Name/Description:

Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants CFDA Number, if applicable: 16.710

8. Federal Action Number, if known:
150,000.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
b. Individual Performing Services (including address if different from No. 10a) Prefix * First Name Middle Name
* Street 1
* City State Zip
Street 2
NA
NA
NA
NA

11. * Last Name Suffix
Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when the transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. * Signature:
04/25/2024
Michele Davis
*Name: Prefix * First Name Barry Middle Name
* Last Name Tippin Suffix
Title: City Manager Telephone No.: 5302254060 Date:

Federal Use Only: Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form - LLL (Rev. 7-97)
Tracking Number:GRANT14131733 Funding Opportunity Number:O-COPS-2024-171975 Received Date:Apr 25, 2024 04:50:06 PM EDT Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 11/30/2025
* 1. Type of Submission: * 2. Type of Application:
* 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier:

6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier:
* a. Legal Name:
* b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): * c. UEI:
* Street1:

Street2:
* City:

County/Parish:
* State:

Province:
* Country:
* Zip / Postal Code:

Department Name: Division Name:

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:
* Last Name:

Suffix:

Title:

Organizational Affiliation:
* Telephone Number: Fax Number:
* Email:
* If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):
* Other (Specify):

State Use Only:

8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
d. Address:
e. Organizational Unit:
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
Preapplication
Application
Changed/Corrected Application
New
Continuation
Revision
04/25/2024 FY 2024 LE Mental Health
City of Redding
94-6000401 XL3JUNNVFLL9
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding
Shasta
CA: California
USA: UNITED STATES
96001-2718
Police Department
Michele
R
Davis
Management Analyst
City of Redding Police Department
5302457145
[email protected]
Tracking Number:GRANT14131733 Funding Opportunity Number:O-COPS-2024-171975 Received Date:Apr 25, 2024 04:50:06 PM EDT Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) * 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
* Other (specify):
* 10. Name of Federal Agency:

11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:

CFDA Title:
* 12. Funding Opportunity Number:
* Title:

13. Competition Identification Number:

Title:

14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
* 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:

Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions.

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
C: City or Township Government
Community Oriented Policing Services

16.710
Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants O-COPS-2024-171975
FY24 Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act (LEMHWA) Implementation Projects Officer Wellness Grant
Add Attachments Delete Attachments View Attachments
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Tracking Number:GRANT14131733 Funding Opportunity Number:O-COPS-2024-171975 Received Date:Apr 25, 2024 04:50:06 PM EDT Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) * a. Federal
* b. Applicant
* c. State
* d. Local
* e. Other
* f. Program Income
* g. TOTAL
.

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:
* Last Name:

Suffix:
* Title:
* Telephone Number:
* Email:

Fax Number:
* Signature of Authorized Representative: * Date Signed:

18. Estimated Funding ($):

21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) ** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions.

Authorized Representative:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
* a. Applicant
Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. * b. Program/Project
* a. Start Date: * b. End Date:

16. Congressional Districts Of:

17. Proposed Project:
1 CA-001
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
10/01/2024 09/30/2026
150,000.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 150,000.00
a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.
04/25/2024
Yes No
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
** I AGREE
Barry
Tippin
City Manager
530-225-4060
[email protected]
Michele Davis
* 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? 04/25/2024
If "Yes", provide explanation and attach
Tracking Number:GRANT14131733 Funding Opportunity Number:O-COPS-2024-171975 Received Date:Apr 25, 2024 04:50:06 PM EDT Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Redding Police Department
Budget Narrative
The proposed budget has been designed to meet the deliverables of the proposed program.

1. Travel – $37,920 This line item is specifically to provide training for the Chaplain Program and the Peer Support Program. The amount requested will allow personnel from these programs to obtain additional training to enhance the programs provided to Department staff. This is imperative in order to enhance these programs to provide support the Department. The amount budgeted is an estimate of how much is needed to send them to appropriate training.

At this time, those trainings/conferences have not been identified.

2. Contract – $113,000 This line item is for three specific contracts. $85,000 is requested to continue with a contract with a licensed clinical therapist for annual mental health check-ins and any necessary follow ups. The Department is using grant funding provided by the State of California for the mental health check-ins. This particular grant is restricted to sworn officers, the funding received was only sufficient for the annual check-in without any follow up visits and these grant funds expire in December 2025. The additional funding would allow the Department to expand the program to include non-sworn staff and to provide the needed funding for follow-up appoints as needed. This supports the deliverables of the grant by ensuring the Department’s staff is mentally prepared to perform their duties. $18,000 is requested to fund an additional year of the Cordico application that is currently used by the Department. This app provides a variety of mental and physical health resources, as well as other resources that support staff’s overall wellness. This app anonymously tracks usage and provide statistics on what type of information staff is looking for. This will allow the Department to tailor the wellness program and provide the services needed by staff. $10,000 is requested to provide other fitness coaching for the staff. This could be by providing nutritional counselling or other types of personal fitness services. At this time, it is unclear exactly what this will look like but it is known that in order to provide a more holistic wellness program, this type of services is needed. These funds will allow the Department to tailor to staff’s needs.

3. Other Costs - $5,000 The Department is requesting these funds to be used towards building family connections. This would include events that support the family since family dynamics and issue can affect the mental health of the staff member. This addresses a holistic approach to wellness for the staff of the Department.

Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Redding Police Department
Project Timeline
Year 1:

Month 1-3:
• Establish partnerships with licensed therapists and community-based wellness organizations. • Contract with therapist.
• Develop and finalize expanded mental health check-in procedures and protocols.

Month 4-6:
• Launch expanded mental health check-ins for all staff. • Conduct initial training for peer support team members and chaplains. • Begin scheduling and conducting follow-up counseling sessions as necessary.

Month 7-9:
• Host wellness workshops on topics such as stress management and resilience. • Implement nutrition counseling and fitness opportunities. • Launch internal newsletter dedicated to wellness updates and resources.

Month 10-12:
• Evaluate effectiveness of mental health check-ins and counseling sessions. • Conduct internal survey on job satisfaction and work-related stress. • Plan and organize wellness challenges to promote engagement.

Year 2:

Month 13-15:
• Expand peer support team training and resources.
• Enhance chaplain program with additional funding and training. • Fund mobile app for wellness resources and tracking.

Month 16-18:
• Host community workshops on trust and satisfaction with agency. • Evaluate effectiveness of wellness challenges and workshops. • Organize family connection opportunities and events.

Month 19-21:
• Review and update wellness program based on feedback and evaluation findings.

Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) • Conduct follow-up surveys on job satisfaction and work-related stress. • Plan and implement additional peer support initiatives Month 22-24:
• Finalize year-end report on program accomplishments and outcomes. • Prepare for renewal of grant funding or seek alternative sources of support. • Celebrate achievements and milestones with department-wide wellness events.

Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application)

BRIAN BARNER
________________________________________________________professional profile

SUMMARY
My objective is to provide exceptional leadership as the Chief of Police for the Redding Police Department. I have over twenty-seven years of diverse professional law enforcement experience with increasing levels of responsibility, including a Master’s Degree in Public Administration and a POST Management Certificate. My family is one of my greatest accomplishments. I have been married for twenty-three years and have two boys, ages twenty and fifteen.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Police Chief Redding Police Department 2023 to present
• $42 million budget.
• 122 sworn and 190 total employees.

Police Captain Redding Police Department 2019 to present • Division Commander of the Administration Division. Responsible for the Department’s hiring, training, professional standards/internal affairs, finance, property/evidence, and body worn cameras.
• Three years as the Patrol Division Commander, leading a division of over 100 employees.
• Department lead for an $8.5 million citywide radio project. • Development team for the Department’s Park Ranger and boating program. • Development team for the first Crisis Intervention Response Team in our area.

Police Lieutenant_________Redding Police Department_____ 2016 to 2019 • Patrol Watch Commander and Support Services Lieutenant. • Implemented the PlanIt payroll system, Lexipol policy manual, computerized the Department subpoena system, updated the RPOA/RPMA Substance Abuse Policy, authored a successful grant for Department fire protection uniforms, and hired over fifty employees as the Support Services Lieutenant. • SWAT Tactical Commander
• Canine Unit Program Manager – successfully increased the unit to six canine teams and co-founder of the Communities for Police Canine non-profit. • Past Program Manager for the Traffic Unit, Peer Support, Neighborhood Police Unit, and Redflex.

Police Sergeant Redding Police Department __ 2010 to 2016 • Acting Lieutenant for one year - 2016.
• Supervised in Patrol, Traffic, and Investigations.
• Grant Coordinator for over $900,000 in traffic related grants. • Led several technology and equipment improvement projects for Department.

Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) • Supervised and managed major investigations - Traffic and Investigations. • Mentored and developed investigators, traffic officers, and civilian staff.

Canine Supervisor Redding Police Department __ 2008 to 2016 • Supervised and managed five canine teams.
• Seven years as canine handler.

Peer Support Supervisor Redding Police Department __ 2008 to 2016 • Supervised and managed a twenty-member team.
• Sixteen years as a member of the Peer Support Team.

SWAT Team Redding Police Department 1999 to 2012
• Held positions of entry team, sniper, team leader, and tactical coordinator. • Supervised and led major tactical operations.
• Responsible for coordinating and providing training for SWAT personnel.

Police Corporal Redding Police Department 2008 to 2010
• Shift supervisor for the Patrol Division.
• Mentored and developed police officers and civilian staff.

Police Investigator Redding Police Department 2006 to 2008 • Investigated and managed major sex crime cases.
• Coordinated the Sexual Assault Felony Enforcement Team.

Motor Officer Redding Police Department 2003 to 2006
• Acting supervisor of the Traffic Unit.
• Coordinated and supervised DUI checkpoints and major special events. • Lead Department motorcycle instructor.
• Investigated and managed fatality and major injury traffic collisions.

EDUCATION
National University, La Jolla, California
• Masters Degree in Public Administration with an emphasis on Organizational Leadership - 2010.
• Graduated with honors.

Southern Oregon University, Ashland, Oregon
• Bachelor of Science Degree - Criminology and Criminal Justice - 2008. • Graduated Magna Cum Laude.
• Outstanding Graduating Senior Award – 2008.

Shasta College, Redding, California
• Associate of Arts, Administration of Justice – 1996.

Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application)

ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
• Board Chair for the Shield Training Consortium.
• Board Member for the Pathways to Hope for Children.
• Redding Police Merit Award recipient – 2008, 2009, 2010. • Redding Police Commendation Award recipient - 2011.
• SWAT Operator of the Year - 2011.
• Past Vice President - Communities for Police Canine Board of Directors. • Graduate of the Leadership Redding Program – 2008.
• Current member of the Leadership Redding Alumni Association. • Board Member of Redding Vipers Baseball Club.
• Foothill Area Little League – past board member and coaching coordinator. • Millville School – past basketball and baseball head coach.

PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
• Graduate of the POST Management Course.
• Graduate of the California Police Chiefs Executive Development Course. • Graduate of the Supervisor Leadership Institute (SLI) Class 375. • POST Management Certificate.
• POST Supervisor Certificate.
• California POST Advanced Certificate.
• Graduate of the City of Redding Supervisor Academy.
• Canine Management Certificate.
• Certified POST Instructor.

Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Regan Ortega
Redding Police Department

SUMMARY
Has eighteen years of diverse law enforcement experience having worked as a Detective Sergeant, Patrol Sergeant, Patrol Corporal, Evidence Technician Supervisor, Officer Involved Critical Incident Response Team Supervisor, Field Training Officer and Program Supervisor, Hostage Negotiator and Program Supervisor, Peer Support Team Member and Program Supervisor, Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Detective, Patrol Officer, School Resource Officer, Explorer Advisor, Tactical Communications Instructor, and a Cadet Mentor. With progressive and varied experience, formal education, advanced training, and self-directed learning, is well qualified to serve as a successful Lieutenant for the Redding Police Department.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Sergeant – Detective Division – 2022 to Present
 Served as Sergeant in the Detective Division, responsible for case management, supervising major investigations, Scheduling, conduct briefings, report review, develop and train personnel.  Effectively supervised several specialized teams - Hostage Negotiations, Child Abduction Response Team, Peer Support Team, Evidence Technician Team, and the Officer Involved Critical Incident Response Team.
 Have created and implemented new policies and have been able to write proposals to purchase new and updated equipment, as well as implement new programs to make current units more effective Sergeant – Operations Division – 2021 - 2022
 Served as a Patrol Sergeant responsible for shift management, critical incident management and officer involved shootings, coordinate scheduling, conduct briefings, report review, develop and train personnel.  Effectively supervised several specialized teams - Field Training, Hostage Negotiations, Child Abduction Response Team and Peer Support Team.
 Have created and implemented new policies and have been able to write proposals to purchase new and updated equipment.

Corporal - Operations Division - 2021 - Present

 Served as Acting Sergeant for extended periods of time, front-line supervisor responsible for shift management, critical incident management and officer involved shootings, coordinate scheduling, conduct briefings, report review, develop and train personnel.  Effectively supervised several specialized teams - Field Training, Hostage Negotiations, Child Abduction Response Team and Peer Support Team.
 Have created and implemented new policies and have been able to write proposals to purchase new and updated equipment.

Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application) Investigator - Support Division - 2017 to 2021

 Lead investigator on officer involved shootings, homicides, robberies, and experience with critical incident management.
 Specialized experience in sexual assault and child abuse investigations, child forensic interviewing, and serves on several multi-disciplinary teams.

School Resource Officer - Operations Division - 2015 to 2017  School related investigations and department liaison for the Redding School District.  Coordinated all aspects of school safety, crime prevention, and community relations.

Patrol Officer - Operations Division - 2005 to 2017
 Served as a proactive field officer at the Redding Police Department, Chico Police Department and Red Bluff Police Department conducting effective enforcement and thorough investigations.  Strive to be accountable, self-initiating, tactical-minded, and responsive to the community. − Chico Police Department 2008-2014 - Field Training Officer, Officer in Charge, Hostage Negotiator, Peace Officers’ Association Board Member; provided training, supervision, coaching, written evaluations, and briefings. Specializes in a variety of high-risk hostage negotiation operations, requiring exemplary communication skills, rapport building techniques, and teamwork − Red Bluff Police Department 2005-2008 - Field Training Officer, Officer in Charge, Peace Officers’ Association Secretary; provided training, supervision, coaching, written evaluations and briefings.

EDUCATION
 Master of Science - Criminal Justice, California Coast University (expected graduation 06/20??)  Bachelor of Arts - Organizational Leadership, Simpson University (2015)  Butte College Law Enforcement Academy – Class 115 (2005)

PROFESSIONAL TRAININGS
Has participated in basic, intermediate, and advanced law enforcement training. Areas of focus and expertise include:
 Sherman Block Supervisory Leadership Institute
 Background Investigation
 Internal Affairs Investigation
 Training & Officer Development
 Criminal Investigations & PORAC Internal Affairs
 Public Speaking & Presentations
 Tactical Communications/De-Escalation
 Crisis Intervention Training
 Community Relations & Engagements
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application)

SPECIALTY ASSIGNMENTS
 Field Training Officer and Program Supervisor
 Tactical Communications Instructor
 Peer Support Team Member and Program Supervisor
 Explorer Advisor
 Cadet Mentor
 Hostage Negotiations Team Member and Program Supervisor  Regional Child Abduction Response Team Member and Program Supervisor

COMMUNITY AFFILATIONS
 Leadership Redding (2023)
 Columbia Elementary School Site Council (2019-2021)
 Operation Blue Santa, Director (2017-Present)
 Shasta Youth Leadership Camp, Staff (2015-Present)
 Never Forgotten Games, Co-Founder (2017-Present)
 Shasta College Non-Traditional Employment for Women, Panelist (2019)

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
 Redding Police Managers’ Association (2021 to Present)  Redding Peace Officers’ Association, Vice President (2017-2021)  California Homicide Investigators’ Association
 California Sexual Assault Investigators’ Association
 National School Resource Officers’ Association
 Peace Officers’ Research Association of California
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Application_Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness (4.9(a)--Ratify Grant Application)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution accepting the City of Redding’s List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2024-25 funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fiscal Impact
The estimated Fiscal Year 2024-25 Road Maintenance and Repair Account (RMRA) funding allocation to the City of Redding (City) is $2,401,484.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the attached resolution. The City would not be eligible to receive Senate Bill (SB) 1 funding in the amount of $2,401,484.

Background/Analysis
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed SB 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs on both the State highway and local streets and road systems. SB 1 increases per-gallon fuel excise taxes; increases diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to gas tax rates in future years. RMRA funds are apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties. The City’s portion of RMRA funds for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is estimated to be $2,401,484.

SB 1 emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency in the delivery of California’s transportation programs. Therefore, in order to be eligible for RMRA funding, cities must submit a project list. The attached project list may be funded with RMRA funds depending on the availability of other funding sources within the Streets Division. The RMRA legislation recognizes the need for, and provides agencies with, the flexibility to fund projects in accordance MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Resolution Accepting the List of Projects Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 336
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 4.11(a)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1 Page 2 with local needs and priorities. As such, the project list is simply a proposal of potential projects that may utilize these funds. Agencies are required, however, to submit expenditure reports by December 1, of each year that detail each project and corresponding amount of RMRA funds utilized to ensure program accountability.

The RMRA provides much needed funds to repair and rehabilitate existing transportation facilities at both the state and local level. The City’s backlog of deferred maintenance continues to grow as need outpaces resources.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Acceptance of the project list is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Attachment_A_Proposed_Projects_List
Packet Pg. 337
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Redding (City) are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must include a list of all projects (Attachment A) proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, in the City budget, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $2,401,484 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024-25 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the seventh year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a public process to ensure public input into our community’s project list; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop portions of the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets and roads and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and numerous similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide;
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(a)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, accepts the proposed projects which will utilize Fiscal Year 2024-25 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation revenues in their delivery. With the listing of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues List of Projects (Attachment A) funded by SB 1, the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of May, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
__________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
______________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(a)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1) Agency Contact:

Brendan Carr
(530) 245-7159
LoCode: 5068 [email protected]
PreConstruction Construction Min. Max.

PP01 Relisted
General Maintenance
General Maintenance to include, but not
limited to pothole patching, crack sealing,
street signs, street striping, etc. | This
project will include: Public Works Staffing,
Other, Procurement of Public Works
Equipment, Procurement of Road
Maintenance and Rehab Materials,
Procurement of Public Works Safety
Materials and Gear.

Citywide 07/2024 06/2025 1 5
PP02 Relisted
Old Alturas Bridge over Churn
Creek
This project will include: bridge structure
rehab/repair (existing), sidewalk and/or
crosswalk installation (new), and bridge
structure widening.

Old Alturas Road at Churn Creek
and 200' before and after bridge
limits.
06/2024 10/2025 15 50
PP03 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 This project will include pavement rehab/repair (existing).

Multiple Locations along Oasis
Rd, Twin View Blvd, Quartz Hill
Rd, and Airport Road in addition
to the CoR Transfer Station
06/2024 06/2025 5 12
PP04 Relisted
Oregon Street Improvements
This project will include cost estimating,
preliminary design, sidewalk and/or
crosswalk installation (new) and storm
drain/culvert installation (new).

Oregon Street between Shasta
Street and Yuba Street.
02/2020 10/2025 10 30
PP05 Relisted
Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap
Completion
This project will include 2-way cycle track,
shared use path, raised intersection with
curb extension, bollards, lane reductions,
raised crosswalks with bike/ped
separations, and shade trees.

Sundial Bridge Drive above and
north of SR44, throughout Turtle
Bay Park and connecting to the
Sacramento River Trail.
02/2020 10/2025 20 30
Local Streets and Roads Program
Agency Name:

Redding
FY
24-25
Senate Bill (SB) 1 Proposed Project List Form
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

ATTACHMENT A
Estimated Completion Date
Estimated
Useful Life
(# of years) Project
No. Relisted Project Title Project Description Project Location Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: ^Attachment_A_Proposed_Projects_List (4.11(a)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City of Redding Fire Department to purchase a fire station alerting system using National Purchasing Partners Government contract pricing, with a net delivered cost of $434,849.24, including all applicable taxes and fees.

Fiscal Impact
In October 2023, City Council (Council) approved American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds in the amount of $1,000,000 for a City of Redding (City) Fire Station Alerting system, therefore, sufficient funds are available in the Redding Fire Department (RFD) budget for the proposed purchase totaling $434,849.24.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to authorize the purchase of the fire station alerting equipment, however without the purchase, the RFD response times will not be reduced, and dispatchers will have less time to take additional calls and provide critical information to responding personnel.

Background/Analysis
RFD currently consists of eight fire stations and a headquarters facility. The purpose of the new station alerting system is to improve department response times to incidents. In addition, this new system proposes to have fewer negative effects on the firefighter’s health by allowing “ramping” of audio and visual dispatching, and adjusting to the existing environment noise levels.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Authorize the Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment for the Redding Fire Department
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 341
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment Page 2 RFD’s staff compared the station alerting equipment and services of several national manufacturers. It was determined that one manufacturer, Honeywell, had products which are manufactured with superior materials, making a more durable component suitable for the extremes of a firehouse. Additionally, Honeywell has an incredible reliability rate for the software associated with the alerting system, where some systems have operated for over six years without having to reboot the computer. Staff felt that due to the durability of the components and the reliability of the software, Honeywell would be the most effective system for their needs.

Staff determined that the station alerting equipment manufactured by Honeywell can be purchased through National Purchasing Partners Government (NPPGov), which the City is a member. NPPGov is a national cooperative procurement organization similar to Sourcewell which the City uses regularly for purchasing equipment or materials at a discounted price. Like Sourcewell, NPPGov has developed national competitive solicitations that meet or exceed local, federal, and state standards. NPPGov offers its members the benefits developed from cooperative solicitations and purchasing. Using this cooperative contract will save significant staff time in preparing bid specifications, provides discounted pricing on the equipment and allows the City to select vendors from the list without any further solicitations. Staff will still prepare construction documents to solicit bids for the install of the City furnished equipment.

Environmental Review
The purchase of equipment is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
Honeywell Quote_May 2024
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 342
Quotation to:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department
Project:

G2 Fire Station Alerting System
One (1) Primary Dispatch System & Nine (9) Station Systems Proposal number:

CA_REDD005
Revision #
4 Quote Date:
01-May-2024
Quote Expires:
30-Jul-2024
INSTALLATION BY:

Not assumed or
Included by USDD
Paul Gyore (ja)
Territory Manager
Honeywell International Inc.
through its US Digital Designs group
1835 E Sixth St #27
Tempe, AZ 85281
602.828.0287 cell
[email protected]
[This Proposal is subject to corrections due to Errors or Omissions] [Pricing Protected per Public Procurement Authority (PPA0), League of Oregon Cities (LOC), Master Price Agreement (MPA) available to members of National Purchase Partners, LLC, dba Public Safety GPO, dba Law Enforcement GPO and dba NPPGov - Contract #VH 1164 - more information available at https://nppgov.com/contract/us-digital-designs]
The Redding Fire Department is Already Member # M-5696840 PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL TITLE Page 1 of 36
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT DI1 LOT USDD 0
Radio System Interface (Full Console
Interface) - Requires (owner-furbished)
dedicated console, specifically and
solely tasked for Station Alerting
RSI-P $ 13,650.00 $ 12,285.00 $ -
DI2 LOT USDD 0 Additional Radio Channel ARC $ 4,225.00 $ 3,802.50 $ - DI3 LOT CAD 1
CAD Interface - Motorola P1 (USDDside Only - Customer responsibility to discuss CAD-side costs (if any) with
their vendor)
CADI-P $ 11,950.00 $ 10,755.00 $ 10,755.00 T
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT DC1a PR USDD 1
G2 Communications Gateway Pair
(Hardware for CAD interface) 2@1RU
each (2RU Total)
G2-GW $ 10,425.00 $ 9,382.50 $ 9,382.50 T
DC2 Kit USDD 1
G2 Gateway Audio Radio Interface
(GaRi) - Kitted with a Rack-Mount
Adapter Plate which mounts (up to) 2
GaRI2s in 19" Rack
GaRI2-RM $ 2,502.00 $ 2,251.80 $ 2,251.80 T
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT DS1 HR USDD 50 Gateway Configuration &
Modifications GW-CM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 13,950.00
DS3b LOT USDD 1
Gateway Installation / BY
CUSTOMER (with REMOTE
ASSISTANCE by USDD Personnel)
GW-I-C $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 292.50
DS3c LOT USDD 1
Gateway Start-Up / On-Site BY
USDD (with direct coordinated
assistance by authorized customer
CAD, Radio & IT personnel)
GW-SU-O $ 5,925.00 $ 5,332.50 $ 5,332.50
DS4 LOT USDD 1 Gateway Project Management GW-PM $ 349.03 $ 314.13 $ 314.13

DISPATCH SYSTEM SERVICES
PRIMARY DISPATCH G2 FSA SYSTEM
CA_REDD005 v4 DISPATCH-LEVEL

DISPATCH SYSTEM INTERFACES

DISPATCH SYSTEM COMPONENTS
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL PRIMARY DISPATCH CENTER Page 2 of 36 Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) DS5a LOT USDD 1
Training - System Administrator /
Dispatch Supervisor - On-Site (4
Hours)
TRA-DIS-O $ 4,025.00 $ 3,622.50 $ 3,622.50 T
DS6a LOT USDD 1
Training - Station-Level
Configuration and Equipment
Usage - On-Site (4 Hours)
TRA-STA-O $ 4,025.00 $ 3,622.50 $ 3,622.50 T
$ 49,523.43
$ 99.00
$ 1,368.75
$ 49,622.43
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT 17 HR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY
& SUPPORT FOR THIS DISPATCH
SYSTEM (or Component): Telephone /
Remote Access Support (8:00 AM -
5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18
months/1.5 years) of initial warranty
has been offered by USDD for no
additional cost so all stations can be
installed and enjoy same
warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 2,487.70 $2,238.93
3358.395 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals

INDIVIDUAL DISPATCH SYSTEMS TOTALS
$ 49,622.43

ENTIRE DISPATCH-LEVEL SUBTOTALS (NOW INCLUDING WARRANTY, OPTIONAL SUPPORT & TAX AS WELL) ALL DISPATCH-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUBTOTAL: $ 49,523.43
ALL DISPATCH-LEVEL SHIPPING SUBTOTAL: $ 99.00
ALL DISPATCH-LEVEL WARRANTY & SUPPORT: $ -
MISC: $ -
$ 49,622.43
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a "T" included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext, multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA PRIMARY DISPATCH G2 FSA SYSTEM TOTAL:

PRIMARY DISPATCH-LEVEL GRAND TOTAL:
(SEE 'SECTION TOTALS' PAGE FOR EVEN MORE DETAIL)

DISPATCH-LEVEL WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT

PRIMARY DISPATCH WARRANTY & SUPPORT
INCLUDES G2 MOBILE SMART-PHONE ALERTING APPS & USDD-HOSTED MAPPING SERVICES (if available). Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support. Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement System Subtotal
PRIMARY DISPATCH G2 FSA SYSTEM System Total:

Shipping Total:

Sales Tax (est.)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL PRIMARY DISPATCH CENTER Page 3 of 36 Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC2 Kit USDD 1
G2 EXPANSION KIT - Allows ability to
Power/Signal/Control up to 12 more peripheral
Remote options per EXP.

EXP $ 7,325.00 $ 6,592.50 $ 6,592.50 T
SC5 Ea TBD 2 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 1,661.40 T SC6 Ea TBD 2 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 102.60 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP6 Ea USDD 2 Push Button, Emergency (Red) PB-R $ 110.00 $ 99.00 $ 198.00 T SP7 Ea USDD 3 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 3,442.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 3,780.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 5,670.00 T SP9d Ea USDD 1
MS-G Adapter Plate, SINGLE. VESA 100, joins (1) MSG-S (or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-S $ 38.00 $ 34.20 $ 34.20 T
SP9e Ea USDD 2
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 88.20 T
SP11 Ea TBD 3 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 774.90 T SP16 Ea USDD 13 G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - SURFACE
Mount (Metal Box), 70v SPK-LED-SM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 3,802.50 T CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 01
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 01 SYSTEM Page 4 of 36 Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) SP17a Ea USDD 3
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 2,200.50 T
SP18b Ea USDD 5
SPEAKER - STANDARD, SURFACE Mount (Metal
Box), 70v SPK-STD-SM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 382.50 T
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 3,282.12 $ 2,953.91 $ 2,953.91
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,695.76 $ 1,526.19 $ 1,526.19 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 601.72 $ 541.55 $ 541.55 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 87.52 $ 78.77 $ 78.77 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 5,470.20 $ 4,923.18
7384.77 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 54,332.21
$ 1,385.00
$ -
$ 3,575.02
STATION SUBTOTAL: $ 59,292.23

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT Warranty & Support:

Sales Tax (est)
Shipping:

STATION 01 System:

The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 01 SYSTEM Page 5 of 36 Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Warranty & Support Notes:

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Station System Installation Notes:
13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal.

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 01 SYSTEM Page 6 of 36 Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP7 Ea USDD 1 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 1,147.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 1,890.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 2,835.00 T SP9e Ea USDD 1
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 44.10 T
SP11 Ea TBD 1 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 258.30 T SP16 Ea USDD 4
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - SURFACE
Mount (Metal Box), 70v SPK-LED-SM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 1,170.00 T SP17a Ea USDD 1
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 733.50
SP18b Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - STANDARD, SURFACE Mount (Metal
Box), 70v SPK-STD-SM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 76.50 T
SP19 Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 279.00 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 02
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 02 SYSTEM Page 7 of 36 Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 1,987.86 $ 1,789.07 $ 1,789.07
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,333.85 $ 1,200.47 $ 1,200.47 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 470.46 $ 423.41 $ 423.41 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 69.58 $ 62.62 $ 62.62 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 3,313.10 $ 2,981.79
4472.685 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 33,293.47
$ 636.00
$ -
$ 2,166.34
$ 36,095.81
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 02 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 02 SYSTEM Page 8 of 36 Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 02 SYSTEM Page 9 of 36 Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP6 Ea USDD 1 Push Button, Emergency (Red) PB-R $ 110.00 $ 99.00 $ 99.00 T SP7 Ea USDD 1 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 1,147.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 1,890.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 3
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 4,252.50 T SP9e Ea USDD 1
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 44.10 T
SP11 Ea TBD 1 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 258.30 T SP16 Ea USDD 4
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - SURFACE
Mount (Metal Box), 70v SPK-LED-SM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 1,170.00 T SP17a Ea USDD 1
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 733.50
SP18a Ea USDD 1 SPEAKER - STANDARD, FLUSH Mount, 70v SPK-STD-FM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 76.50 SP18b Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - STANDARD, SURFACE Mount (Metal
Box), 70v SPK-STD-SM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 76.50

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 03
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 03 SYSTEM Page 10 of 36 Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) SP19 Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 279.00
SP21 Ea USDD 1 G2 Strobe Light / Red LED STR $ 550.00 $ 495.00 $ 495.00 Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 2,127.06 $ 1,914.35 $ 1,914.35
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,427.26 $ 1,284.53 $ 1,284.53 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 503.40 $ 453.06 $ 453.06 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 74.45 $ 67.00 $ 67.00 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 3,545.10 $ 3,190.59
4785.885 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 35,624.85
$ 700.00
$ -
$ 2,318.04
$ 38,642.89
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 03 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (Est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 03 SYSTEM Page 11 of 36 Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 03 SYSTEM Page 12 of 36 Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP7 Ea USDD 1 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 1,147.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 3,780.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 2,835.00 T SP9e Ea USDD 2
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 88.20 T
SP11 Ea TBD 2 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 516.60 T SP16 Ea USDD 4
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - SURFACE
Mount (Metal Box), 70v SPK-LED-SM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 1,170.00 T SP17a Ea USDD 1
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 733.50 T
SP18b Ea USDD 2
SPEAKER - STANDARD, SURFACE Mount (Metal
Box), 70v SPK-STD-SM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 153.00 T
SP19 Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 279.00 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 04
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 04 SYSTEM Page 13 of 36 Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 2,139.12 $ 1,925.21 $ 1,925.21
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,418.95 $ 1,277.05 $ 1,277.05 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 499.13 $ 449.22 $ 449.22 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 74.87 $ 67.38 $ 67.38 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 3,565.20 $ 3,208.68
4813.02 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 35,805.66
$ 738.00
$ -
$ 2,331.18
$ 38,874.84
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 04 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 04 SYSTEM Page 14 of 36 Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 04 SYSTEM Page 15 of 36 Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP6 Ea USDD 1 Push Button, Emergency (Red) PB-R $ 110.00 $ 99.00 $ 99.00 T SP7 Ea USDD 2 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 2,295.00 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 05
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 05 SYSTEM Page 16 of 36 Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) SP9b Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 1,890.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 5,670.00 T SP9e Ea USDD 1
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 44.10 T
SP11 Ea TBD 1 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 258.30 T SP16 Ea USDD 11 G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - SURFACE
Mount (Metal Box), 70v SPK-LED-SM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 3,217.50 T SP17a Ea USDD 2
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 1,467.00
SP18b Ea USDD 4
SPEAKER - STANDARD, SURFACE Mount (Metal
Box), 70v SPK-STD-SM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 306.00 T
SP19 Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 279.00 T SP21 Ea USDD 1 G2 Strobe Light / Red LED STR $ 550.00 $ 495.00 $ 495.00 T PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 05 SYSTEM Page 17 of 36 Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 2,493.66 $ 2,244.29 $ 2,244.29
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,419.31 $ 1,277.38 $ 1,277.38 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 500.81 $ 450.73 $ 450.73 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 74.81 $ 67.33 $ 67.33 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 4,156.10 $ 3,740.49
5610.735 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 41,444.63
$ 946.00
$ -
$ 2,716.74
$ 45,107.37
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 05 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 05 SYSTEM Page 18 of 36 Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 05 SYSTEM Page 19 of 36 Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP7 Ea USDD 1 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 1,147.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 3,780.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 3
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 4,252.50 T SP9e Ea USDD 2
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 88.20 T
SP11 Ea TBD 2 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 516.60 T SP16 Ea USDD 4
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - SURFACE
Mount (Metal Box), 70v SPK-LED-SM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 1,170.00 T SP17a Ea USDD 1
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 733.50 T
SP18b Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - STANDARD, SURFACE Mount (Metal
Box), 70v SPK-STD-SM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 76.50 T
SP19 Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 279.00 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 06
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 06 SYSTEM Page 20 of 36 Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 2,228.52 $ 2,005.67 $ 2,005.67
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,495.34 $ 1,345.80 $ 1,345.80 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 527.42 $ 474.67 $ 474.67 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 78.00 $ 70.20 $ 70.20 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST)
RS-1YR-STD $ 3,714.20 $ 3,342.78
5014.17 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 37,324.14
$ 746.00
$ -
$ 2,428.60
$ 40,498.75
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 06 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 06 SYSTEM Page 21 of 36 Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 06 SYSTEM Page 22 of 36 Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP6 Ea USDD 1 Push Button, Emergency (Red) PB-R $ 110.00 $ 99.00 $ 99.00 T SP7 Ea USDD 3 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 3,442.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 1,890.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 2
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 2,835.00 T SP9e Ea USDD 1
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 44.10 T
SP11 Ea TBD 1 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 258.30 T SP15 Ea USDD 9
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - FLUSH Mount,
70v SPK-LED-FM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 2,632.50 T
SP17a Ea USDD 3
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 2,200.50 T
SP18a Ea USDD 7 SPEAKER - STANDARD, FLUSH Mount, 70v SPK-STD-FM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 535.50 T SP19 Ea USDD 2
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 558.00 T SP21 Ea USDD 1 G2 Strobe Light / Red LED STR $ 550.00 $ 495.00 $ 495.00 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 07
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 07 SYSTEM Page 23 of 36 Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 2,424.96 $ 2,182.46 $ 2,182.46
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,291.70 $ 1,162.53 $ 1,162.53 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 456.70 $ 411.03 $ 411.03 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 68.71 $ 61.84 $ 61.84 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 4,041.60 $ 3,637.44
5456.16 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 40,192.26
$ 944.00
$ -
$ 2,641.63
$ 43,777.88
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 07 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 07 SYSTEM Page 24 of 36 Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 07 SYSTEM Page 25 of 36 Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP6 Ea USDD 1 Push Button, Emergency (Red) PB-R $ 110.00 $ 99.00 $ 99.00 T SP7 Ea USDD 3 G2 MESSAGE REMOTE 2 Module MR2 $ 1,275.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 3,442.50 T SP9b Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) STANDARD
GammaSign / 24" Active Screen Width MS-G-S $ 1,050.00 $ 945.00 $ 3,780.00 T SP9c Ea USDD 3
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 4,252.50 T SP9e Ea USDD 2
MS-G Adapter Plate, DOUBLE, VESA 100, joins (2) MSG -S(or-E) to any standard mount with VESA 100 hole patterns (mount not included)
MS-AP-D $ 49.00 $ 44.10 $ 88.20 T
SP11 Ea TBD 2 MS Mount - Articulating, Long reach MS-MNT-ART-L $ 287.00 $ 258.30 $ 516.60 T SP15 Ea USDD 9
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - FLUSH Mount,
70v SPK-LED-FM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 2,632.50 T
SP17a Ea USDD 3
G2 SPEAKER - OmniAlertStrobe -
Omnidirectional Alerting Speaker, optimized for
high Vocal Intelligibility in large open indoor areas
and with High-Intensity LED Strobe Light Arrays
- includes Cable Hanging Kit (typically requires
MR2 for power/signal/control)
SPK-OAS $ 815.00 $ 733.50 $ 2,200.50 T
SP18a Ea USDD 4 SPEAKER - STANDARD, FLUSH Mount, 70v SPK-STD-FM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 306.00 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL
STATION 08
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 08 SYSTEM Page 26 of 36 Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) SP19 Ea USDD 1
SPEAKER - APP BAY/OUTDOOR - Weatherized,
Surface Mount, 70v SPK-W-SM $ 310.00 $ 279.00 $ 279.00 T SP21 Ea USDD 1 G2 Strobe Light / Red LED STR $ 550.00 $ 495.00 $ 495.00 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 2,631.72 $ 2,368.55 $ 2,368.55
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,478.15 $ 1,330.33 $ 1,330.33 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 521.96 $ 469.76 $ 469.76 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 77.64 $ 69.87 $ 69.87 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 4,386.20 $ 3,947.58
5921.37 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
$ 43,714.32
$ 984.00
$ -
$ 2,867.06
$ 47,565.38
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT STATION 08 System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 08 SYSTEM Page 27 of 36 Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STATION 08 SYSTEM Page 28 of 36 Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SL1 Ea USDD 1 G2 VOICEALERT - Single Station License. VA $ 1,030.00 $ 927.00 $ 927.00 T SL2 Ea/Yr USDD 24
G2 MOBILE FSAS APP - Single Device License. Up
to 24 Licenses-Per-ATX are offered at $0.00 cost each
as long as system is currently under warranty or elected recurring annual support coverage. See 'Mobile' Section for more detail.

G2-APP-DLI $ 108.00 $ 97.20 N/A - Included
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SC1 Kit USDD 1
G2 ATX STATION CONTROLLER -
Power/Signal/Control up to 8 peripheral Remote
Options. 4 Unique Amps/Zones available.

ATX $ 21,750.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 T
SC5 Ea TBD 1 ATX UPS, Standard UPS-STD $ 923.00 $ 830.70 $ 830.70 T SC6 Ea TBD 1 Shelf/Bracket, Wall-Mount for UPS UPS-WMB $ 57.00 $ 51.30 $ 51.30 T Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SP9c Ea USDD 4
G2 MESSAGE SIGN (Digital LED) EXTENDED
GammaSign / 36" Active Screen Width MS-G-E $ 1,575.00 $ 1,417.50 $ 5,670.00 T SP15 Ea USDD 2
G2 SPEAKER - LED Illuminated - FLUSH Mount,
70v SPK-LED-FM $ 325.00 $ 292.50 $ 585.00 T
SP18a Ea USDD 5 SPEAKER - STANDARD, FLUSH Mount, 70v SPK-STD-FM $ 85.00 $ 76.50 $ 382.50 T

STATION SYSTEM LICENSES

STATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER

STATION SYSTEM PERIPHERAL COMPONENTS
CA_REDD005 v4 STATION-LEVEL

FIRE HEADQUARTERS
Based from USDD G2 Fire Station Alerting System Design Drawing # USDD.CA_REDD.ALL STATIONS.FSA.2023.12.12.pdf PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL HEADQUARTERS Page 29 of 36 Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SS1 Ea USDD 0
Station Installation (Not included - Pending final
authorized system design submission to G2
Trained/Certified Contractor for installation
quote to include in final turnkey project pricing)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS2 Ea USDD 0
Station Remediation (Removal and Disposal of
Legacy Equipment Not currently Assumed or
Included, nor is any related Remediation to Paint,
Drywall, etc.)
ST-INST $ - $ - $ -
SS3 Ea USDD 1
Station Configuration & Start-Up (price perstation if USDD has access to 4 or more stations per trip)
ST-SU $ 1,868.10 $ 1,681.29 $ 1,681.29
SS4 Ea USDD 1 Station Project Management ST-PM $ 1,345.03 $ 1,210.53 $ 1,210.53 SS5 Ea USDD 1 Station Engineering / Design Services ST-ES $ 473.25 $ 425.93 $ 425.93 SS6 Ea USDD 1 Station Documentation ST-DM $ 68.50 $ 61.65 $ 61.65 T SS7a Ea USDD 0
Station Training - Configuration and Equipment.

On-Site @ Station. 4 Hours, 1 Visit. (for Technical
Services Staff)
TRA-UT-O $ 4,025.00 $ 3,622.50 $ -
SS7b Ea USDD 0
Station Training - User/Technician / Remote
Refresh (2 Hours) TRA-UT-R $ 600.00 $ 540.00 $ -
SS8a Ea USDD 0
Training - Installation Contractor - On-Site /
USDD G2 Certification / 8 Hours (TBD - only
needed if requied to use non-certified contractor)
TRA-IC-O $ 5,325.00 $ 4,792.50 $ -
SS8b Ea USDD 0
Training - Installation Contractor - At Arizona
Training Center / USDD G2 Certification / 8 Hours
(TBD - only needed if required to use non-certified
contractor)
TRA-IC-AZ $ 2,725.00 $ 2,452.50 $ -
SS9 Ea USDD 0 Miscellaneous/TBD MISC $ - $ - $ -
Item Unit Mfr Qty Description Part No. US List Unit QUOTE UNIT QUOTE EXT SW1 YR USDD 1.5
[STANDARD] 1st YEAR WARRANTY &
SUPPORT FOR THIS STATION SYSTEM (or
component): Telephone / Remote Access Support
(8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST) PLEASE NOTE: An
additional 6 months (for total of 18 months/1.5
years) of initial warranty has been offered by USDD
for no additional cost so all stations can be installed and enjoy same warranty/support start/stop dates)
RS-1YR-STD $ 3,113.50 $ 2,802.15
4203.225 but No
Charge For Initial
Warranty Period /
Not Included in
Subtotals
SW2 YR USDD 0.0
[STANDARD] EACH ADDITIONAL YEAR (12-
Months) WARRANTY & SUPPORT FOR THIS
STATION SYSTEM (or Component): Telephone /
Remote Access Support (8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MST)
IF QUANTITY '0' THEN NO ADDITIONAL

SUPPORT IS ASSUMED OR AUTHORIZED

BEYOND INITIAL WARRANTY PERIOD
RS-AYR-STD $ 3,113.50 $ 2,802.15 $ -
$ 31,400.89
$ 566.00
$ -
$ 2,036.03
$ 34,002.92
The sales tax quoted herein is based upon those items that have a T included immediately to the right of the Quote Ext. multiplied by .0725, which is represented by Customer as the prevailing sales tax rate for Redding, CA

STATION SYSTEM SERVICES

STATION SYSTEM WARRANTY & OPTIONAL RECURRING ANNUAL SUPPORT FIRE HEADQUARTERS System:

Shipping:

Warranty & Support:

STATION SUBTOTAL:

Sales Tax (est)
PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL HEADQUARTERS Page 30 of 36 Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) 12 - All electrical power, including (but not limited to) raceway,conduit, backboxes, service panels, high-voltage wiring and fixtures by others. 13 - All communications pathway infrastructure (network, radio, etc.) by others unless specifically detailed in this proposal. 14 - USDD cannot warrant nor support any owner-furbished (3rd-Party) system or component we are required to integrate with. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments. 15 - Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this limited warranty null, void and of no further effect 11 - If applicable, Gas Control Shutoff Valve Addendum (to USDD and installation contractor) must be signed prior to installation.

Station System Installation Notes:
01 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no installation by USDD or it's subcontractors is assumed or provided. 02 - Because these are mission-critical systems, USDD can only warrant and support systems installed by G2 Trained and Certified Contractors. 03 - USDD can source, qualify, train and certify Local Licensed Regional Subcontrators where needed. 04 - Installation warranted by installation contractor - G2 FSAS warranted, serviced and supported by USDD. 05 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, installation to be performed during normal working hours. 06 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no permit fees or material charges have been included. 07 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no removal or remediation has been assumed or included. 08 - Unless specifically detailed in this proposal, no bonds of any type (performance, bid) have been assumed,included or budgeted for in this proposal. 09 - USDD FSAS Equipment to be made available by owner to Installation Contractor prior to on-site arrival. 10 - Structural backing for system devices and other millwork (not specifically detailed) by others.

Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support.

Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement.

USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

For FSAaaS Program: The cost of service and support beyond initial warranty period is included in the FSASaaS Program for a total of 5 years. The service and support includes Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services. Please see the FSASaaS Subscription Agreement for more information concerning the service and support provided by USDD. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup.

USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

Warranty & Support Notes:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL HEADQUARTERS Page 31 of 36 Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) QUOTE
1835 E. Sixth St. Suite #27
Tempe, Arizona 85281
877-551-8733 tel 480-290-7892 fax DATE: 5/1/2024
Expires: 7/30/2024
Quote SUBMITTED TO:

The City of Redding, California
Redding Fire Department

REF PROPOSAL
$ 50,991.18
Includes: $ 49,622.43
$ -
$ 1,368.75
Notes:
$ 383,858.07
$ 55,717.21
$ -
$ 3,575.02
$ 33,929.47
$ -
$ 2,166.34
$ 36,324.85
$ -
$ 2,318.04
$ 36,543.66
$ -
$ 2,331.18
$ 42,390.63
$ -
$ 2,716.74
$ 38,070.14
$ -
$ 2,428.60
$ 41,136.26
$ -
$ 2,641.63
STATION 03 Sales Tax (estimate):

Includes:

Includes: STATION 05 SYSTEM:

STATION 05 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

STATION 06 Sales Tax (estimate):

STATION 05 Sales Tax (estimate):

STATION 04Sales Tax (estimate):

STATION 07 SYSTEM:

STATION 07 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

Section Totals

DISPATCH-LEVEL SUBTOTAL

STATION-LEVEL SUBTOTAL
PRIMARY DISPATCH G2 FSA SYSTEM :

PRIMARY DISPATCH WARRANTY & SUPPORT :

CA_REDD005 v4

SECTION TOTALS
[UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL PRICES ARE $US]
PRIMARY DISPATCH G2 FSA SYSTEM Sales Tax (estimate):

One (1) Primary Dispatch Center System currently included in this proposal.

No backup or disaster-recovery dispatch systems have been requested, assumed or included in this proposal.

STATION 07 Sales Tax (estimate):

Includes: STATION 06 SYSTEM:

STATION 06 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

Includes:

STATION 02 SYSTEM:

STATION 02 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

Includes:

STATION 01 Sales Tax (estimate):

STATION 01 SYSTEM:

STATION 02 Sales Tax (estimate):

STATION 03 SYSTEM:

STATION 03 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

Includes:

Includes:

STATION 04 SYSTEM:

STATION 04 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

STATION 01 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL SECTION TOTALS Page 32 of 36 Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) $ 44,698.32
$ -
$ 2,867.06
$ 31,966.89
$ -
$ 2,036.03
Notes:

US Digital Designs System Total $ 434,849.24
$ 24,449.37
(TBD By Customer) Customer must elect to choose any coverage they require beyond initial warranty period, or USDD will not be authorized to provide any service or support. Mobile Smart Phone Alerting App and Mapping Services only available to customer while under warranty or elected recurring annual support. Support Agreements subject to change if system design is modified. For additional details, please review current USDD Warranty Statement and Service Agreement
TOTAL ESTIMATED SALES TAX:

FIRE HEADQUARTERS CALIFORNIA COST RECOVERY FEE:

Sales Tax is estimated only based on USDD's limited knowledge of CA Sales Tax Laws, and representations from Customer that the tax rate if 7.25%. Actual tax may vary and will be calculated at the time of purchase.

Nine (9) Station Systems currently included in this proposal. Installation Station Installation included - Pending final authorized system design submission to G2 Trained/Certified Contractor for installation quote to include in final turnkey project pricing.

STATION 08 SYSTEM:

Includes:

STATION 08 WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

Includes:

STATION 08 CALIFORNIA COST RECOVERY FEE:

FIRE HEADQUARTERS SYSTEM:

FIRE HEADQUARTERS WARRANTY & SUPPORT:

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL SECTION TOTALS Page 33 of 36 Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment)

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
(Contract Sales)

1. REMITTANCES All invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt in United States currency, free of exchange, or any other charges, or as otherwise agreed in writing by Honeywell International Inc., throuigh its US Digital Designs group (hereinafter called “USDD”).

2. PROPOSALS This proposal expires 30 days after its date. Prices are subject to correction for error.

3. PROGRESS PAYMENTS USDD reserves the right to invoice Customer monthly for all materials delivered. Invoices are due NET 30 upon receipt by Customer. If the Customer becomes overdue in any progress payment, USDD shall be entitled to suspend further shipments, shall be entitled to interest at the annual rate of 18%, and also to avail itself of any other legal remedies. Customer agrees that it will pay and/or reimburse USDD for any and all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs which are incurred by USDD in the collection of amounts due and payable hereunder.

4. CANCELLATION AND SUSPENSION Any order resulting from this proposal is subject to cancellation or instructions to suspend work by the Customer only upon agreement to pay USDD for all work in progress and all inventoried or ordered project parts and materials, and all other costs incurred by USDD related to the contract.

5. TAXES All taxes of any kind levied by any federal, state, municipal or other governmental authority, which tax USDD is required to collect or pay with respect to the production, sale, or delivery of products sold to Customer shall be the responsibility of Customer. Customer agrees to pay all such taxes and further agrees to reimburse USDD for any such payments made by USDD.

6. LOSS, DAMAGE OR DELAY USDD shall not be liable for any loss, damage, or delay occasioned by any causes beyond USDD’s control, including, but not limited to, governmental actions or orders, embargoes, strikes, differences with workmen, fires, floods, accidents, or transportation delays. IN NO EVENT SHALL USDD BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL OR SPECIAL DAMAGES.

7. 7.1 PRODUCT DEFECTS. If a product is defective and a valid claim is made within the Warranty Period, at its option, USDD will either (1) repair the defective product at no charge, using new parts or parts equivalent to new in performance and reliability or (2) exchange the product with a product that is new or equivalent to new in performance and reliability and is at least functionally equivalent to the original product. Any replacement product or part, including a user-installable part that has been installed in accordance with instructions provided by USDD, shall remain under warranty during the Warranty Period or for 90 days from the date of repair, whichever is later. When a product or part is exchanged, any replacement item becomes the Customer’s property and the replaced item becomes the property of USDD. Customer shall be responsible for and bear all risks and costs of shipping any products to USDD for repair. USDD shall be responsible for and bear all risks and costs of returning any product to Customer after repair or replacement. Replacement products will be returned to Customer configured as it was when the product was originally purchased, subject to applicable updates.

7.2 CLAIMS. Prior to making a Warranty claim, Customer is encouraged to review USDD’s online help resources. Thereafter, to make a valid claim hereunder, Customer must contact USDD technical support and describe the problem or defect with specificity. The first such contact must occur during the Warranty Period. USDD’s technical support contact information can be found on USDD’s web site at http://stationalerting.com/home/about-usdd/contact-usdd/. Customer must use its best efforts to assist in diagnosing defects, follow USDD’s technical instructions, and fully cooperate in the diagnostic process. Failure to do so shall relieve USDD of any further obligation hereunder.

7.3 EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS. USDD does not warrant that the operation of its product or any related peripherals will be uninterrupted or error-free. USDD is not responsible for damage arising from Customer’s failure to follow instructions relating to the product’s use. This Warranty does not apply to any Hardware or Software (as defined below) not used for its intended purpose. This Warranty does not apply to monitors or televisions manufactured by third parties. Repair or replacement of such components shall be subject exclusively to the manufacturer’s warranty, if any. Recovery and reinstallation of Hardware and user data (including passwords) are not covered under this Warranty. This Warranty does not apply: (a) to consumable parts, such as batteries, unless damage has occurred due to a defect in materials or workmanship; (b) to cosmetic damage, including but not limited to scratches, dents and broken plastic on ports; (c) to damage caused by use with non-USDD products; (d) to damage caused by accident, abuse, misuse, flood, lightning, fire, earthquake or other external causes; (e) to damage caused by operating the product outside the permitted or intended uses described by USDD; (f) to damage or failure caused by installation or service (including upgrades and expansions) performed by anyone who is not a representative of USDD or a USDD authorized installer or service provider; (g) to a product or part that has been modified to alter functionality or capability without the written permission of USDD; or (h) if any serial number has been removed or defaced.

WARRANTY: USDD warrants and guarantees its products for 12 months from the day of shipment to Customer (the “Warranty Period”), subject to the terms and limitations set forth herein. The Customer’s rights and remedies with respect to a product found to be defective in material or workmanship shall be limited exclusively to the rights and remedies set forth herein. Any misuse, unauthorized modification, improper installation, excessive shock, attempted repair, accident, or improper or negligent use, storage, transportation, or handling by any party other than USDD shall render this warranty null, void and of no further effect. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system or component it has not proofed engineering for and has not specifically authorized for use within public safety environments.

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STANDARD T&C Page 34 of 36 Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment)

TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THIS WARRANTY AND REMEDIES SET FORTH ABOVE ARE EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, REMEDIES AND CONDITIONS, WHETHER ORAL OR WRITTEN, STATUTORY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. AS

PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, USDD SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL STATUTORY OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,

INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND WARRANTIES AGAINST HIDDEN OR LATENT DEFECTS. If USDD cannot lawfully disclaim statutory or implied warranties then to the extent permitted by law, all such warranties shall be limited in duration to the duration of this express Warranty and to repair or replacement service as determined by USDD in its sole discretion. No reseller, agent, or employee is authorized to make any modification, extension, or addition to this Warranty. If any term is held to be illegal or unenforceable, the legality or enforceability of the remaining terms shall not be affected or impaired.

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THIS WARRANTY AND TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, USDD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DIRECT,

SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ANY BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONDITION, OR UNDER ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF USE; LOSS OF REVENUE; LOSS OF THE USE OF MONEY; LOSS OF ANTICIPATED SAVINGS; LOSS OF GOODWILL; LOSS OF REPUTATION; and LOSS OF, DAMAGE TO OR CORRUPTION OF DATA. USDD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INDIRECT LOSS OR DAMAGE HOWSOEVER CAUSED INCLUDING THE REPLACEMENT

OF EQUIPMENT AND PROPERTY, ANY COSTS OF RECOVERING PROGRAMMING OR REPRODUCING ANY PROGRAM OR DATA

STORED OR USED WITH USDD PRODUCTS, AND ANY FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA STORED ON THE PRODUCT. USDD disclaims any representation that it will be able to repair any product under this Warranty or make a product exchange without risk to or loss of the programs or data stored thereon.

8. SERVICE AGREEMENT. The Product being purchased hereunder is not subject to any post warranty service agreement or maintanence program unless specifically contracted for between USDD and Customer. USDD offers a comprehensive post warranty Service Agreement at additional cost. Customer should contact USDD regarding its Service Agreement and costs associated therewith.

9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Customer hereby agrees and acknowledges that USDD owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the Intellectual Property (as defined below). Customer agrees to not remove, obscure, or alter USDD’s or any third party's copyright notice, trademarks, or other proprietary rights notices affixed to or contained within or accessed in conjunction with or through USDD’s Product (as defined below). Nothing herein shall be deemed to give, transfer, or convey to Customer any rights in the Intellectual Property other than the License, as set forth below.

9.1 LICENSE: At all times that Customer is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all other agreements between the parties, Customer shall have a non-exclusive, non-transferable, fully paid license to use the Software, but only in conjunction with the Hardware provided by USDD and only in conjunction with Customer’s fire station alerting system pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

9.2 DEFINITIONS: For purposes of this Section the following terms shall have the following definitions:

9.2.1 “Intellectual Property " means any and all rights of USDD related to USDD’s Product existing from time to time under patent law, copyright law, trade secret law, trademark law, unfair competition law, and any and all other proprietary rights, and any and all derivative works, work product, applications, renewals, extensions and restorations thereof, now or hereafter in force and effect worldwide;

9.2.2 “USDD’s Product” means any and all Hardware and Software provided to Customer by USDD under this Agreement or any other contract, purchase order, or arrangement;

9.2.3 “Hardware” means a physically tangible electro-mechanical system or sub-system and associated documentation but specifically excludes any televisions or monitors manufactured by a third party; and

9.2.4 “Software” means software programs, including embedded software, firmware, executable code, linkable object code, and source code, including any updates, modifications, revisions, copies, documentation and design data that are licensed under this Agreement.

10. Remote Access to System.
a. USDD requires remote network access to the System, including access to Customer’s Communications Gateways, Station Controllers, and other USDD-supplied equipment through Secure Shell (SSH) to perform implementation and support tasks under this contract. To enable this the Customer will provide USDD support personnel VPN or similar remote network access to the System for USDD support personnel (“Customer Support”) to effectively troubleshoot critical or complex problems and to expedite resolution of such issues. Remote network access is also used to install core System software upgrades and customized software. USDD will only access Customer’s System with the knowledge and consent of Customer.
b. Alternative to Network Access. If the Customer elects not to provide remote network access to the System, then USDD may not be able to perform some support functions. Customers that elect not to routinely provide network access may temporarily reinstate this access to allow USDD to perform the above services. The following services will not be performed without this access:
· System software upgrades
· System software customization
· Network troubleshooting assistance including packet capture and network monitoring on USDD devices · Detailed log analysis
· Bulk updates to System database tables
· Troubleshooting that requires low-level system access or large file transfer PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STANDARD T&C Page 35 of 36 Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) c. Timely Access. Customers much ensure that remote access is available prior to notifying USDD of a support request. In the event that the Customer is unable to provide remote access, USDD will not be required to provide support outside those tasks that do not require remote access, and any corresponding resolution response times will not apply. d. Physical Security Tokens. USDD has multiple software engineers that provide after-hours support and these engineers do not typically take security tokens from the USDD office. If the customer requires the use of physical security tokens this may delay after hours service.

11. GOVERNING LAW Any contract resulting from this proposal shall be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona.

12. ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS This proposal shall become a binding contract between the Customer and USDD when accepted in writing by the Customer. Without limiting the foregoing, issuance by Customer of a purchase order to USDD for any of the goods or services herein described shall constitute acceptance. Any such acceptance shall be with the mutual understanding that the terms and conditions of this proposal are a part thereof with the same effect as though signed by both parties named herein and shall prevail over any inconsistent provision of said order. No waiver, alteration, or modification of these terms and conditions shall be binding unless in writing and signed by an authorized representative of USDD.

13. SHIPPING/DELIVERY: Unless specifically detailed as otherwise in this proposal, all shipping and delivery costs (even thouse detailed persystem) relate to single combined shipment to a single point of delivery. If requested otherwise then costs and terms subject to change.

14. CREDIT CARDS: All USDD quotes are developed for the customer with the understanding the eventual purchase would be facilitated using standard Purchase Order and Invoice process. If customer would rather use a Credit Card for purchase then said order would be subject to a 4% credit card processing charge.

15. USDD cannot warrant nor support any system configuration that deviates from this specific proposal's documented station system design file number. USDD Cannot warrant nor support any system not using USDD-approved UPS Battery Backup. USDD cannnot warrant nor support any system not installed by G2 Trained & Certified Installation technician (installer). If customer intends to tie this system into any 3rd-party system or devices, USDD will be unable to warrant or support the sytem until we've had a chance to review documented engineering assumptions and approve system integrity, performance and reliability expectations.

16. THIS QUOTE SUBJECT TO REVIEW FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS.

PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL STANDARD T&C Page 36 of 36 Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Honeywell Quote_May 2024 (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following actions:
1) Approve re-appropriation of American Rescue Plan Act funds from the Redding Fire Department rolling stock to allow for the use of the funds to install a Fire Station Alerting system throughout all eight Fire Stations and Headquarters to reduce response times in the City of Redding and comply with National Fire Protection Association 1225 guidelines; and
2) Adopt Resolution adopting and approving the 17th Amendment to Budget Resolution No. 2023- 060 re-appropriating $ 1,000,000 in ARPA funds for Fiscal Year 2023- 24.

Fiscal Impact
There is no additional fiscal impact.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the re-appropriation of funds and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/ Analysis
The City Council appropriated $ 1,000,000 of American Rescue Plan Act funds to the Redding Fire Department (RFD) rolling stock on May 2, 2023. RFD has since identified a more pressing need for funding, specifically a station alerting system for all eight fire stations and headquarters.

The station alerting system will improve department response times to incidents.

MEETING DATE: October 17, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.8(a)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
jvanlandingham@cityofredding. org btippin@cityofredding. org SUBJECT: 4.8(a)-- Re-Appropriation of ARPA Funds - Fire Station Alerting Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Report to Redding City Council October 10, 2023
Re: 4.8(a)--Re-Appropriation of ARPA Funds - Fire Station Alerting Page 2 An alerting system notifies responders in the fire stations of a call. The Department currently uses an antiquated alerting system that does not meet National Fire Protection Association NFPA) 1225 guidelines. The Redding Fire Department' s response times are above the national average. The current alarm to dispatch time, or call processing time for the RFD, is 4:03 90 percent of the time. The NFPA 1225 guideline time standard for the call process is within 60 seconds 90 percent of the time. Call processing time is the time that a 911 call comes into the Dispatch Center to the time of notification in the fire station. Installi ng a modern station alerting system will reduce the call processing time by eliminating pre-alerting and two-tone dispatching.

The alerting system will also reduce the amount of “ voice time” for the dispatcher, freeing them up to take additional calls and get critical information to responding personnel.

In the recent Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating evaluation, the RFD's dispatch times were identified as below NFPA standards, and the City received half of the points possible in this category. The new station alerting system will improve response times and may improve points in this category.

Firefighter' s health and safety is also a concern. A new station alerting system allows for ramping” of both audio and visual during the dispatch; the new system will adjust to the environment' s noise. It will increase in noisy environments and decrease in quiet environments, avoiding sudden loud speakers. Studies have found sudden noise to be a factor in stress-related illness.

RFD understands that the re-appropriation of funds will affect the ability to immediately purchase new apparatus; however, the reduction in response times to all calls outweighs the need for additional apparatus at this time.

The City Council has approved much- needed apparatus purchases over the past two budget cycles, allowing the Department to take possession of five new Type 1 engines, two Type 3 engines, a ladder truck, and several trucks. As a result, RFD’ s rolling stock age has decreased from 16 to 12 years since the last budget cycle. Other factors that are affecting the decision not to purchase apparatus at this time include the current elevated purchase price and extended lead times on fire apparatus. The lead time for a Type 1 Engine or Truck is approximately 3.5 years.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
Public Safety – " Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding." Attachments
Resolution
Staff Report - 4.10(a)-- American Resource Plan Act (ARPA) project and budget modifications.

05.02.2023
Resolution 2021-078
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Resolution No. 2023 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 17th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 REAPPROPRIATING $ 1,000,000 IN AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS FOR INSTALLATION of FIRE STATION ALERTING SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT ALL EIGHT FIRE STATIONS AND HEADQUARTERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101 1502 Fire - Suppression 0
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase Expenditures
101- 1502- 6000740- 00000 ARPA - Fire Alerting System 1,000, 000$ 101- 1502- 6000706- 00000 ARPA - Fire Apparatus 1,000,000$ Total 1,000, 000$ 1,000,000$
THAT the purpose is to re-appropriate $ 1,000,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for installation of Fire Station Alerting Systems throughout all eight stations and headquarters for fiscal year 2023- 24.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the _________ day of ___________, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 89th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021- 078 amending appropriations for American Rescue Plan Act ( ARPA) projects to include:
deferred General Fund facility maintenance, Redding Fire and Police Department (RPD) vehicle purchases, funding of RPD’ s Beat 8 and Park Ranger positions through Fiscal Year 2025- 26.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund by approving staff recommendation. If the budget resolution is not approved, there will be a fiscal impact or a modification to services recommended to City Council ( Council) for further consideration.

Alternative Action
The Council could provide alternative direction to staff regarding modifications to the ARPA expenditure plan.

Background/ Analysis
On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law H.R. 1319 – American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The City of Redding (City) was allocated $18,693,433, which was slated to be paid in two tranches. The first tranche was received on May 21, 2021, and approximately a year later the second tranche was received. Staff brought multiple informational items to the Council regarding the funding and possible usage, and the first of which was presented June 1, 2021.

On February 17, 2022, staff presented a recommended plan to the Council regarding the allocation of the ARPA funds. Subsequently, on March 10, 2022, the Council approved the plan regarding the ARPA expenditures. This included $ 4 million dollars for a citywide fiber ring to support broadband infrastructure and $2.5 million for infrastructure improvements at Stillwater MEETING DATE: May 2, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.10(a)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
grobinett@cityofredding. org btippin@cityofredding. org SUBJECT: 4.10(a)-- American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) project and budget modifications Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/ City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Report to Redding City Council April 27, 2023
Re: 4.10( a)--ARPA project and budget modifications Page 2 Business Park.

On May 3, 2022, the Council voted to amend the original allocation for the broadband project by reducing it by $750, 000 to $3.25 million in order to fund the Riverfront Specific Plan.

As staff began preparing for the 2023- 25 Biennial Budget, it was clear that the major tax revenues were going to cause difficulties in presenting a balanced budget and 10-year plan. At the first Biennial Budget Workshop meeting on February 16, 2023, staff recommended that the Council consider amending the ARPA plan. Specifically, staff believes priorities have changed regarding broadband and Stillwater Business Park infrastructure expenditures. This was due in part to the expected difficulties in the budget development process due to the decreased tax revenues expected, specifically with sales tax revenue. The Council approved redirecting the remaining $5.75 million dollars that had been allocated to the broadband and Stillwater Business Park infrastructure projects to General Fund expenditures.

Staff recommends approving to use the $5.75 million in question in the following ways:
750,000 to fund deferred General Fund facility maintenance; 2 million for Police and Fire ($1 million each) vehicle purchases; and 3 million to fund beat 8 and the Park Ranger positions through Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable Ten-Year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Communication and Transparency – “ Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
Resolution
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) Resolution No. 2023 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 89TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078
APPROPRIATING $ 0 FOR RE-ALLOCATION OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT

ARPA) CITYWIDE BROADBAND AND STILLWATER INFRASTRUCTURE

PROJECTS TO FUND POLICE VEHICLES, FIRE APPARATUS, POLICE PARK RANGERS, POLICE 8TH BEAT, AND VARIOUS GENERAL FUND FACILITY MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021- 078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
111
111
111
178
442
462
427
437
Police
Fire
Non- Departmental
General Fund Capital
4,000,000
1,000,000
2,500, 000
2,500,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase ( Decrease) Revenues
111- 437- 6-2650- 15 Federal Grant Capital - Gen Govt ( 2,500,000)$ 111- 427- 6-2650- 15 Federal Grant Capital - Gen Govt ( 2,500, 000) 111- 442- 6-2650- 09 Federal Grant Operating - Police 3,000, 000 111- 462- 6-2650- 17 Federal Grant Capital - Fire 1,000, 000 111- 442- 6-2650- 16 Federal Grant Capital - Police 1,000, 000 Increase ( Decrease) Expenditures
111- 427- 4010- 92 ARPA - Broadband Infrastructure ( 3,250, 000) 178- 437- 4010- 91 ARPA - Stillwater Infrastructure ( 2,500, 000) 111- 427- 4010- 83 ARPA - General Fund Facilities 750,000 111- 442- 4010- 82 ARPA - Police Vehicles 1,000, 000
111- 462- 4010- 84 ARPA - Fire Apparatus 1,000,000
111- 442- 4010- 90 ARPA - Park Rangers 2,000, 000
111- 442- 4010- 95 ARPA - Police 8th Beat 1,000,000
Total -$ -$
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment) THAT the purpose is to appropriate $ 0 for Re-Allocation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) citywide broadband and Stillwater infrastructure projects to fund police vehicles, fire apparatus, police park rangers, police 8th beat, and various general fund facility maintenance and improvements for fiscal year 2022-23.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the _________ day of ___________, 2023 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Purchase of Fire Station Alerting Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to submit a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act loan application in an amount not to exceed $25 million;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to submit U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) application in an amount not to exceed $6 million with a 20 percent local match of $1.2 million; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the loan and grant submittal process and if awarded loan or grant funds, appropriate the funds, negotiate terms, if any and execute any agreements to implement either the loan or grant.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $46 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The Project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the Project to date.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Low-Interest Loan to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 386
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under the Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan program or the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) grant and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component in the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937 and has been in continual service since, with modifications and upgrades performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989. Staff plans to completely replace and relocate PS01 because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. The replacement station will be relocated approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing location to a deeper pool in the river. The new station will also have increased capacity to meet anticipated future demands, with proposed firm capacity of 42 million gallons per day (MGD) compared to its current capacity of 29 MGD. Project construction is anticipated to start in 2026 with completion expected in 2027 or 2028.

The new PS01 will be located adjacent to the confluence of Jenny Creek to the Sacramento River, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek during the construction of the Project. Jenny Creek is currently conveyed through two culverts beneath the Sacramento River Trail. The culverts are failing and their outlets are typically above the Sacramento River level preventing fish passage, so restoration of Jenny Creek is a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will need to perform at some point. The Jenny Creek restoration work will remove the culverts and restore the open channel, and provide two new bridges for trail access in the area. It will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead from the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the Project.

Jacobs was selected to provide professional consulting services for the Project, including a preliminary design report, environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the project. Within its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying grant and loan opportunities and applying for grants. If application for the WIFIA loan and Culvert AOP Program Grant are approved by the Council, then Jacobs will assist staff with the applications.

Packet Pg. 387
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
On September 7, 2023, the Council approved the City as an applicant for three grants and one loan associated with the Project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), and a loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A summary of the grants and loans that Council has approved applications for to date, and those that are requested for Council approval herein are provided in Table 1.

Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/7/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.

WCB- Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/7/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS- Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/7/23 $25 M $1.5 M Awaiting next
application cycle.

SWRCB- State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan 9/7/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $72 M $3.6 M
WIFIA Loan Pending $25 M Low
Interest
FHWA- Culvert AOP Grant Pending $6 M $1.2 M
Total: $103 M $4.8 M

1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans.

Although the approved request total of $72 million and the total request of $103 million in the table above is much higher than the expected project cost of $46 million, it is unknown which of these funding sources will actually be awarded. The City was not selected for the USFWS National Fish Passage Program and there may be a high level of competition with the other programs. In addition, the eligible project costs through the NMFS grant are probably closer to $5 million (lower than the approved request limit of $25 million shown above), so the maximum funding that could come from the applications that Council has approved to date is likely closer to a maximum of $50 million.

Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the Project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, if approved by the Council, that could benefit the Project and reduce costs to the Utility. If the City is fortunate and is awarded funding from grants or loans in excess of the project costs, then the Utility will utilize funding that will minimize its long-term costs. The Utility’s preferred funding sources are ranked from highest to lowest in the following Table 2.

Funding sources at the top would be utilized over sources at the bottom, as available.

Packet Pg. 388
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
Table 2- Preferred Funding Source Ranking
Rank Grant/Loan Program Reasons for Ranking
1 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(Principal Forgiveness, 0% interest)
No local match or interest.
2 Grant Programs No interest, but local match will likely be needed. 3 Water Utility Funds Insufficient funds for Project costs, but avoids loan interests.
4 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(with low interest rate)
Very low interest rates.
5 WIFIA Loan Interest rates likely higher than State Revolving Fund.

The WIFIA loan, which staff is requesting approval for application, is ranked the lowest of the identified funding options, but it could still be a good option to fund the Project if the other funding sources will not cover all Project costs. Staff’s intent, if Council approves, is to proceed with the initial steps for the WIFIA loan as a contingency plan to avoid project delays in the event that the other funding options do not become available.

The WIFIA program does not provide grants, but it still has a number of features and flexibilities that make it preferable to municipal revenue bonds and other loan programs for water, wastewater, and stormwater capital projects. Benefits include repayment period flexibility, low interest rates, an opportunity for a one-time renegotiation of the rate to a lower rate during the project implementation period, and lower initial costs/fees than municipal bonds. The repayment period for a WIFIA loan can be up to 35 years and the WIFIA program allows for the opportunity to delay the start of the repayment period up to five years after substantial completion of construction. Interest rates for WIFIA loans are set on the date the loan is closed and based on the U.S. Treasury State & Local Government Series interest rate for a comparable maturity. Interest rates are typically lower than municipal bond rates and currently the rate for a long-term WIFIA loan is approximately 4.4 percent.

The WIFIA loan program includes a two-part application process. If authorized by the Council, staff will proceed with part one of the process, which involves submitting a Letter of Interest to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the EPA selects the Project, then the City would be invited to proceed to part two of the process and apply for the loan. EPA only selects projects that it expects will proceed to closing. If the City were to proceed to part two of the process and submit a full application, then the City would be required to pay EPA an initial application review fee of $100,000 at the time of the application to cover costs for EPA’s external contractors’ (legal, financial and technical) review costs. When the loan is finalized the City would be required to pay the actual costs for EPA’s outside contractors, which are expected to total $100,000 to $150,000, including the initial review fee. The Utility Fund would pay for the application review fees, if necessary, and these review costs could be included in the loan.

Staff intends to proceed with part one of the process, which does not require any fees, and then await responses from the State Revolving Fund and grant applications prior to proceeding with Phase 2 of the WIFIA process and paying any fees, if selected and necessary.

Packet Pg. 389
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 5
The WIFIA program has a rolling selection process with funding available on an ongoing basis.

It announced in its Fiscal Year 2023 Notices of Funding Availability that up to $7.5 billion of financing will be available. The need for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and the public benefits that it will provide should make it a good candidate for EPA selection for a loan through its WIFIA program.

FHWA’s Culvert AOP Program is a competitive grant program that awards approximately $200 million in grants annually for projects that replace, remove, and repair culverts or weirs and meaningfully improve or restore fish passage for anadromous fish. It provides grants up to $50 million and would require a 20 percent non-federal match. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the Project meets the selection criteria and makes the Project a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.

Environmental Review
Applying for a loan or grant funding is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The design and environmental technical studies are currently under way for the Pump Station 1 Project. These studies will provide the information necessary to ensure CEQA compliance prior to construction.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 390
Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.

On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.

The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.

The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.

The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.

City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.

2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 398
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.

Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.

MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).

In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.

City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.

City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.

Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.

Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.

After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:

This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.

Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.

PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:

Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.

JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.

JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.

One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.

The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.

Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.

Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.

Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.

Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.

Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.

JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.

JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.

The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 425
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update regarding the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact
Project costs will be funded by the Wastewater, Water and Streets Division. The updated estimated total Placer Street Project (Project) cost of the repairs is $2,470,000.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On May 7, 2024, Council adopted an emergency resolution for the Project and authorized the negotiation of an emergency public works contract. Staff is currently working with a contractor to negotiate scope, costs and terms of a contract to begin work. Staff anticipates construction starting in June or early July 2024, depending on material availability and will continue to update Council as the project progresses.

The Project proposes to replace substandard sewer pipe, associated infrastructure, failing asphalt concrete and other miscellaneous public health and safety work, on Placer Street and within the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvement Phase I project limits.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Update Regarding Emergency and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 426
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Page 2
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On May 7, 2024, the Council determined that the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15269(b)-Emergency Projects.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding” Attachments
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 427

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths affirmative vote, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and award an emergency public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $300,000;
(4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction management and inspection amounts up to a total of $175,000; and
(5) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact
The estimated Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project) total cost is $2,475,000. These costs include construction, construction contingency and staff time for construction management and inspections. The project will be funded with remaining Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 funds. Including withheld retention, liquidated damages and uncompleted work items which is approximately $2,160,000. Supplemental funding of $315,000 will come from the Wastewater, Water and Streets Division’s Fiscal Year 2023-24 budgets which have sufficient funds appropriated.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Emergency Construction Contract to Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt) Report to Redding City Council May 2, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Emergency Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Pavement on Placer St. Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead have staff prepare plans and specifications to award a contract to the low bidder in accordance with state and local contracting procedures. Or, Council could provide alterative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On April 1, 2024, Council voted to enter into a Contract Amendment, Settlement Agreement and Release with the contractor for the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 project. This settlement agreement was partially due to the contractor’s refusal to make required repairs to substandard work done on the project. This substandard work has the potential to create public health and safety issues.

Staff has considered repackaging the project plans and specifications for bidding; however, this process would likely require a minimum of six months in order to obtain an executed contract and ultimately provide a contractor with a notice to proceed. This timeline is unacceptable given the condition of the installed sewer infrastructure and would jeopardize being able to complete all the repair work, including re-paving Placer Street, prior to the onset of winter. In addition, current Magnolia Area Sewer Improvement Phase 1 project site conditions present potential impacts to public health, property and safety. Therefore, staff proposes an emergency contract to replace the substandard sewer pipe and associated infrastructure, failing asphalt concrete and minor associated public health and safety work on Placer Street and within Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 project limits. Staff estimates the work will be complete within four months of commencement of construction activities.

It is noted that the Public Contract Code (PCC) (Section 20168) provides that the local government’s legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the PCC (Section 22050) provides that “in case of emergency, a public agency, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts.”
It is in the public’s interest and necessity to repair the sewer system, pave Placer Street and repair or replace other associated minor items of work immediately to ensure protection of the public’s health, safety and personal property occurs.

The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects. Section 15269(b) includes emergency repairs to publicly and privately-owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. The emergency repair and replacement will occur in areas of previous disturbance, and the repairs are necessary to maintain service essential to public health.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt) Report to Redding City Council May 2, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Emergency Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Pavement on Placer St. Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt) RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING TO

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AN EMERGENCY
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO REPAIR AND REPLACE SUBSTANDARD SEWER PIPE AND FAILING ASHPHALT CONCRETE

PAVEMENT ON PLACER STREET
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code 4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2024, Council voted unanimously to enter into a Contract Amendment, Settlement Agreement and Release regarding the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements – Phase I project; and WHEREAS, portions of the underground sewer improvements constructed as part of the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements – Phase I project were not constructed in accordance with the contract documents; and
WHEREAS, proper sewer infrastructure is critical to public health; and WHEREAS, if not repaired immediately, the improperly installed sewer infrastructure has a high potential for failure during high-flow periods, winter, potentially ultimately causing significant disruptions in service, failures and damage to associated public and adjacent private infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Placer Street is a primary arterial with moderate traffic volumes and the asphalt concrete pavement is in a failing condition as a result of longitudinal and transverse sewer trench pavement patches within the roadway section presenting a public safety concern; and WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids is anticipated to require six (6) months and would further delay the needed repairs to prevent sewer blockages, sink holes and further damage to the public and private infrastructure until 2025; and
WHEREAS, continued pavement failure and blockage of the sewer conveyance system would threaten the safety and property of roadway users and persons nearby; and WHEREAS, isolation of the impacted area so that the delay due to competitive bidding could be accommodated would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the sewer conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the roadway.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt)

3. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore authorizes the City Manager to award an emergency construction contract to repair the sewer system and roadway along Placer Street.

4. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_________________________________ _____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt) CITY OF REDDING LOCATION MAP MAGNOLIA AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 1 EMERGENCY REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LOCATION PROJECT ORIGINAL REPAIR AREA EMERGENCY APPROVED Packet Pg. 433
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt) APPROVED Packet Pg. 434
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Mayor’s recommendation to appoint Leslie Williem to the Planning Commission, to serve a four-year term beginning May 1, 2024, and ending April 30, 2028.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation.

Background/Analysis
David Stine was appointed to the Planning Commission on April 2, 2024. Mr. Stine has submitted his resignation effective immediately, therefore creating one unscheduled vacancy.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
^L.Williem PC Application 02-16-23 expires 02-16-25_Redacted ^Williem, Leslie Resume 02-16-23 expires 02-16-25_Redacted MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider Mayor's appointment to the City of Redding Planning Commission.

Tenessa Audette, Mayor
Packet Pg. 435
Boards, Commissions,
and Committees
City of Redding City Clerks Office
777 Cypress Ave., 3rd Floor, Redding, Ca 96001
phone: 530.225.4447 | email: [email protected] Board, Commission, and Committee Application
Please note that applications are accepted continuously and will be kept on file for two years. Submitting an application does not ensure that you will be selected. As vacancies and openings occur, applications will be reviewed to fill openings as needed. Your name, occupation, business contact information, statement of qualifications, and reasons for service may be publicly released without your consent upon appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee.

Yes No Yes No Yes No
❒ AdministrativeHearingsBoard
❒ BoardofAppeals
❒ CommunityDevelopmentAdvisoryCommittee
❒ CommunityServicesAdvisoryCommittee
❒ EconomicDevelopmentCorpofShastaCounty
❒ ShastaCountyConsolidatedOversightBoard
❒ Planning Commission
❒ ShastaCountyCommissiononAging
❒ ShastaMosquito&VectorControlDistrict
❒ ShastaPublic LibraryCitizensAdvisoryCo.

Are you a Redding Resident? Do you work in Redding? Do you own a business in Redding? Full Name:

Phone #:

Business Phone:

Please indicate which Board, Commission, or Committee you would like to apply for. Please number by order of interest. If you have no interest, please mark "0" Home Address:

Name of Business/Employer:

Occupation:

Business Address:

Date:

Email:

Business Email:

Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: ^L.Williem PC Application 02-16-23 expires 02-16-25_Redacted (5.1--Appointment to Planning Commission) Boards, Commissions,
and Committees
Interests & Experiences
High School, College, Professional, Vocational, or Other Schools Attended. Please include Major or Field of Study, Dates Attended, Degree and Date of Degree.

List any position or office held in governmental agency, civic, or charitable organization. (This is not a requirement for appointment.)
Please state why you want to become a member of this Board, Commission, or Committee.

Please provide any otherinformation which you feel would be useful in reviewing your application State and local law require that you abstain from participation in decisions that may affect your financial interests, including sources of income, interest in real property, personal finances or investments. In addition, if appointed, you may be required to fill out a disclosure statement which identifies certain of your financial interest beginning with the immediate twelve-month period prior to your appointment.

City of Redding City Clerks Office
777 Cypress Ave., 3rd Floor, Redding, Ca 96001
phone: 530.225.4447 | email: [email protected] Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: ^L.Williem PC Application 02-16-23 expires 02-16-25_Redacted (5.1--Appointment to Planning Commission) Boards, Commissions,
and Committees
City of Redding City Clerks Office
777 Cypress Ave., 3rd Floor, Redding, Ca 96001
phone: 530.225.4447 | email: [email protected] Reference 1 Name:

Reference 2 Name:

Reference 1 Phone or Email:

Reference 2 Phone or Email:

References
Verification
Yes
Yes
No
No
If applicable, have you ever attended a meeting of the Board, Commission or Committee to which you are applying for?
Would you be able to attend meetings at the scheduled time? By checking the box below, you agree with the following statement.

I agree that all of the information contained in my responses to the questions on this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by checking the box below and submitting this application, online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the date submitted.

I Agree
Thank you for your application! You will be notified if there is a vacancy/opening and you have been selected to serve. Please attach a resume, if applicable, to this application and submit via email to:

[email protected].

Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: ^L.Williem PC Application 02-16-23 expires 02-16-25_Redacted (5.1--Appointment to Planning Commission) Leslie G. Williem
Experience
Over seven years of progressive management and administrative experience. Possess excellent written, oral and interpersonal communication skills. Proficient in business and Internet applications including, but not limited to the following: Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Publisher, Project, Visio, FrontPage, HRIS, Java, all email clients and web browsers.

Professional Experience
Administrative Secretary/ Chief Financial Officer, Robert S. Bryant, Inc. 2005 - Present Oversee financial planning and budget requirements. Develop and maintain operational systems for financial functions, billing, and collections. Design and implement effective cost controls. Serve as primary relationship manger to business, government, and municipal representatives. Monitor all administrative and regulatory issues corporate compliance, vendor issues, customer issues, contracts and employment law. Act as principal adviser to the President on all matters pertaining to administrative and technical support; Plan, organize, implement, manage and oversee the activities of all administrative support operations.

Senior Administrator, EarthLink Network, Inc. 2000 - 2004 Managed the training and development of administrative staff on, both, east and west coasts while maintaining the same functions as an Administrative Coordinator.

Administrative Coordinator, EarthLink Network, Inc. 1999 - 2000 • Established Administration in the Sacramento, CA call center • Acted as liaison between all departments such as Finance, Site Services and Human Resources. • Entered data in the employee databases while maintaining employee files and spreadsheets. • Ordered, maintained and monitored supplies.
• Arranged travel for Managers and Supervisors as needed. • Prepared expense reports, invoices and petty cash reconciliation for processing. • Processed terminations, promotions, transfers and all salary adjustments. • Coordinated all department events
• Supported Site Director in all his clerical needs such as organizing and maintaining schedule and project(s). Compiled quarterly operation reviews and monitored the division’s finances.

Site Coordinator, Office of Community Outreach 1997 – 1998 The Office of Community Outreach works with the Sacramento community to offer various programs. Sacramento Mentoring takes CSU Sacramento students as mentors and introduces them to local high school students. • Managed Sacramento High School office and acted as liaison between students and CSUS main office
Education
• Bachelor of Arts Degree in Communication Studies
California State University Sacramento, June 1998
• Master Degree in Organizational Development
Chapman University, December 2001
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: ^Williem, Leslie Resume 02-16-23 expires 02-16-25_Redacted (5.1--Appointment to Planning Commission)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept report and provide direction to staff relative to reducing the City of Redding’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget, in preparation for further adjustments in the development of the next biennial budget.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact in accepting the report, however, any direction provided by the City Council (Council) could result in a decrease or cost reductions to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose to not accept the report.

Background/Analysis
In fiscal year ending in 2022, tax revenues for the City of Redding (City) were very favorable.

Between 2019 and 2022 there was an 18.5 percent increase in sales tax, with steady growth occurring since 2012. Based on this information, revenue forecasts would indicate that additional public services could be offered to the community in the 2025-2027 timeframe.

In May of 2021 and again in May of 2022, the City received distributions of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds totaling just over $18 million. Additionally, in Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City received $5 million in funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for adding 12 new firefighter positions, for a limited period. The Council had accepted this grant with the anticipation of completing Fire Station 9 and the additional staff would operate from that station.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.1(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(c)--Consider City of Redding budget reductions for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 440
Report to Redding City Council May 16, 2024
Re: 9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion Page 2
With the above noted funding, and the projected revenue growth, staff recommended and Council approved advanced filling of positions in the Police and Fire Departments as well as funding other important activities as noted in the attached staff report from February of 2022.

Subsequent to these decisions, sales tax began declining and due to the compounding effects inherent in the 10-year plan, the costs associated with the added expenditures can no longer be absorbed. Some of the expenses were reduced with the adoption of the current budget, however, more reductions are needed to balance the 10-year plan. Fortunately, the City has a healthy reserve and that will allow some opportunity to more slowly introduce the cost reductions so as to avoid drastic and immediate service reductions and staff disruption. But, without question, service and staffing levels must be reduced to maintain a strong fiscal position for the City.

Attached are a number of cost reduction proposals for the Council’s consideration. Once direction is provided by the Council, staff will perform the detailed administrative work necessary to effectuate the changes and return to the Council for final approval.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Previous Staff Report - Consider New GF Expenditures - RFD RPD ^Potential Budget Reductions & Potential ARPA
Packet Pg. 441

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve increase of City of Redding General Fund expenditures; and direct staff to prepare a budget resolution for future consideration as part of the mid-year budget update to appropriate the necessary funds.

Fiscal Impact
Should all of the items listed in the attached Recommendation for Increased Budget Expenditures report be approved, the impact to the General Fund will be approximately $500,000 for Fiscal Year ending 2022 and $6 million for Fiscal Year ending 2023. The balance of the items will be incorporated as part of future budgets.

Background/Analysis
With the economic uncertainty created by the COVID 19 pandemic, the current adopted budget assumed modest growth in General Fund revenues. The reality is that revenues have outpaced the budgeted amounts significantly and there is expectation that moderate growth will continue after budget adjustments are made. These positive results have provided an opportunity to make some significant budget adjustments to improve the City of Redding’s (City) service delivery.

The attached recommendations contain numerous items to be funded over the next six years with brief descriptions for each funding request. The information below provides a more detailed description of each request.

POLICE DEPARTMENT ($1.5 MILLION/YEAR; $9 MILLION 6-YEAR TOTAL) For the Police Department, the budget change, in combination with the recommendations for the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 funding, would allow for the hiring of nine new Officers.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2022
ITEM NO. 3B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 3B--Consider approval of new expenditures for the City of Redding General Fund.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: ^Previous Staff Report - Consider New GF Expenditures - RFD RPD (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2022
Re: 3B--Consider approval of new General Fund expenditures Page 2 Four of the Officers would be dedicated to the City Parks, Trails, and Open spaces and five would be used to re-create an eighth patrol beat. This change will increase opportunities for proactive policing, re-prioritize patrol time for Officers assigned to the Neighborhood Police Unit, work to reduce response times to calls for service, and allow for more initiatives as sought by the community. This change will increase the number of sworn Officers on staff to 119, returning the department to levels the City had in 2008. In addition, the department intends to hire an Executive Assistant for Command Staff, who will also assist with coordinating training with the Shield Training Center and support additional staff to research and respond to Public Records Act requests as required by State Law – SB1421 & SB16.

The budget changes would allow for the process to begin the implementation of a Body Worn Camera Program; this would bring RPD into uniformity with comparable cities of similar size to Redding. Other funding would be used to replace and upgrade the various firearms used by RPD as well as increase funding for vehicle purchases and replacements, all of which serve to improve safety for Redding Police Officers and the community.

FIRE DEPARTMENT ($2.2 MILLION/YEAR; $13.2 MILLION 6-YEAR TOTAL) For the Fire Department, the budget recommendations will continue the commitment of the City Council (Council) to improve the capabilities of the Redding Fire Department. If approved, and the SAFER Grant is received, these changes will support increased staffing for a new Station 9, which will significantly help reduce call volume to other stations and improve response times for fire suppression and medical emergencies. Other key funding recommendations will support equipment replacement, better align rolling stock budgets with apparatus needs, and assist with processing new developments and public outreach.

DEBT SERVICE ($0.6 MILLION/YEAR; $3.6 MILLION 6-YEAR TOTAL) A key component of the public safety recommendation is for the Council to decide that a bond issuance is required in order to build, rebuild, or reconstruct the City’s fire stations. As the Council is aware, there is significant deferred maintenance with the existing fire stations.

Addressing this need, combined with a new Station 9 will likely cost at least $25 million. The only feasible way to address the high capital cost is through a bond which also ensures future residents, who will benefit from the stations, will assist with funding the construction. Lacking the bond, staff recommends that the Council direct staff to return at a later date with a different expenditure plan for the current budget surplus.

An effective way to offset the cost of this bond debt is to forgive the loan from the Redding Electric Utility (REU) to the General Fund which was used to pay for a portion of the replacement of soccer fields. The community benefits more from the loan forgiveness than repayment. With repayment, REU would receive approximately $350,000 per year which represents about 0.23 percent of its revenue. Repayment would not reduce rates, affect bond ratings or any other financial metric. In fact, an annual payment of $350,000 is the approximate cost of a single day of operation for REU. Contrarily, $350,000 in the General Fund will fully fund two police officers along with all of their equipment for an entire year.

The material impact of funding Station 9, and making improvements to other existing stations, is the added protection this offers businesses and residents which could also result in a better Insurance Services Office fire rating, perhaps better options for insurance coverage, and possibly lower insurance rates, as well.

Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: ^Previous Staff Report - Consider New GF Expenditures - RFD RPD (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2022
Re: 3B--Consider approval of new General Fund expenditures Page 3 CITY MANAGER ($96,000/YEAR; $575,000 6-YEAR TOTAL)
The downtown redevelopment is occurring at lightning speed. With the redevelopment, two additional discussions are taking place; one regarding parking and one regarding the creation of a property/business improvement district (PBID). A City contribution of an initial $200,000 would help maintain the public assets while the PBID is in the formation stage.

The Economic Development Corporation (EDC) is focused on growing, diversifying and maintaining a balanced economy, thereby leading to more economic stability and sustainability for our region. The EDC is responsible for retaining and expanding the primary industry base in Shasta County with a focus on economic development and competitive vitality. The City currently provides $86,000 per year to the EDC, and an additional $75,000 per year would allow for the EDC to hire additional staff which would provide more benefit to our community.

COMMUNITY SERVICES ($390,000/YEAR; $2.3 MILLION 6-YEAR TOTAL) The Community Services Department has a broad role and responsibility for the City. Most of the department is funded by the General Fund and augmented by grants and donations. Key responsibilities include maintaining the City’s building facilities and its parks and trails. The department, like many in the General Fund, has been understaffed for years. This budget surplus provides the opportunity to add staff resources and funding to continue to maintain the facilities.

This request is for one Building & Facilities Mechanic II and one Gardener. Additionally, $300,000 is requested to repair the Council Chamber roof and $250,000 per year is requested to begin proactive repair work on City facilities. Lastly, the Nur Pon open space needs security enhancements. In partnership with Dignity Health, $60,000 will be used toward funding the installation of perimeter fencing.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ($100,000/YEAR; $640,000 6-YEAR TOTAL) The Development Services Department is responsible for facilitating development in our community. This includes new construction as well as remodeling, upgrades, and replacement of private infrastructure. During the Great Recession, staffing in Development Services was reduced as the demand for services dwindled. As development activity has increased, adding staff has been slow and deliberate. Even this request is less than what is needed to handle the current workload, but it will certainly help. The department makes use of consultant help and improved technology to increase production and efficiency, but additional staffing is needed to improve turn-around time for projects.

PUBLIC WORKS ($112,000/YEAR; $670,000 6-YEAR TOTAL)
The Public Works Department is a large and diverse entity. Most of the divisions within the Public Works Department are Enterprise Funds and/or have funding sources other than the General Fund. Two needs, however, have been identified that require General Fund contributions. First, is a Mechanic II. As the City’s fleet of vehicles grows, so does the need to properly staff the Fleet Division. One additional mechanic will assist in reducing the vehicle maintenance backlog, improve the timeliness of required inspections, and reduce downtime of key equipment.

Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: ^Previous Staff Report - Consider New GF Expenditures - RFD RPD (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2022
Re: 3B--Consider approval of new General Fund expenditures Page 4 The Airport continues to grow and gain momentum in the acquisition of new air service. To keep up with service level expectations and to position the Airport for future grant opportunities, it is recommended that the General Fund assist the Airport by providing $1.23 million as noted on the attached document; $650,000 of which should be reimbursed by future Federal Aviation Administration Grants.

Staff is recommending that the General Fund Reserve remain above 14 percent for this budget adjustment. The required reserve by Council Policy, is 10 percent and this additional capacity in the General Fund will allow for future adjustments during normal budget processes.

Additionally, the recommended changes represent a significant workload for staff and there is not much room to accomplish more prior to the next budget adoption.

Though the items included in this request are substantive, these requests do not provide for all the services the community needs and deserves. This is simply due to funding. The City is large and sparsely populated when compared to other similarly sized communities, which increases the cost per capita to serve residents. Chico for example, has a population of 95,000 people across

34.5 square miles compared to the City of Redding at 95,000 people over 62 square miles. Below is a brief summary of what additional needs could be funded with additional revenue:

POLICE DEPARTMENT ($4.5 million)
• Five Officers for Beat No. 9 $850,000 annually
• Seven Detectives (2 nighttime and others to resolve backlog) $1.5 million annually • Other Misc. Administrative Staff and Equipment $750,000 annually • County Assistance for Mental Health and Criminal Detention $1.5 million annually FIRE DEPARTMENT ($4.9 million annually)
• Fire Station No. 10 Staffing $2 million annually
• Additional Rolling Stock $1 million annually
• Dedicated Fire Dispatcher $900,000 annually
• Paramedics at Key Fire Stations $2 million annually
• Fire Resiliency Programs $1 million annually
PUBLIC WORKS ($4 million annually)
• Airport Division - non-aeronautic improvements $500,000 annually • Storm Drain Utility- enhanced maintenance $1 million annually • Streets Division -road maintenance $4 million annually COMMUNITY SERVICES ($3 million annually)
• Enhanced Building Maintenance $1.5 million annually
• Enhanced Park Maintenance $1.5 million annually
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS/ENHANCEMENTS ($3 million annually) COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENTS-Over Time
• Airport Terminal Acceleration $10 million
• Fire Station No. 10 $7.5 million
• New Amphitheater $1 million
• Additional Trails and Parks $5 million
• Park Marina and Civic Improvements $50 million
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: ^Previous Staff Report - Consider New GF Expenditures - RFD RPD (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2022
Re: 3B--Consider approval of new General Fund expenditures Page 5 • Additional Overcrossing of I-5 $10 million
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community
Attachments
Recommendation for Increased General Fund Expenditures
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: ^Previous Staff Report - Consider New GF Expenditures - RFD RPD (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion) Item Total Cost GF %
Assistant City Clerk - City Clerk Office (Net of PERS UAL & PARS Savings) $ 150,000.00 62% Assistant City Attorney/or Stop Payment for Misdemeanor Prosecution $ 190,000.00 40% Finance $ 90,000.00 50%
Building Inspector $ 120,000.00 100%
Principal Planner $ 170,000.00 100%
Retirement do not backfill - Reprographics Tech II $ 83,000.00 36% General Fund O&M Reduction including SHASCOM $ 550,000.00 100% Internal Service Fund O&M $ 652,310.00 35%
9 Police Officer Position Attrition $ 1,629,873.00 100% 12 Firefighter Position Attrition $ 1,506,689.00 100%
Total
Item
Microsoft Office 365 - General Fund Cost
Sidewalk Repair and Maintenance
Tiger Field Scoreboard
Total Currently Identified
Proposed Savings
Unfunded Budget Items for Potential ARPA Reallocation
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: ^Potential Budget Reductions & Potential ARPA (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion) Total Savings Fiscal Year
$ 93,000.00 2024-25
$ 76,000.00 2024-25
$ 45,000.00 2024-25
$ 120,000.00 2024-25
$ 170,000.00 2024-25
$ 29,880.00 2024-25
$ 550,000.00 2024-25
$ 228,308.50 2024-25
$ 1,629,873.00 2025-26
$ 1,506,689.00 2025-26
$ 4,448,750.50
Budget Required
$ 200,000
$ 500,000
$ 100,000
$ 800,000
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: ^Potential Budget Reductions & Potential ARPA (9.1(c)--2024-2025 Budget Discussion)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following relative to the Redding Police Department Military Equipment:
(1) Accept the Redding Police Department Military Equipment Report; (2) Adopt an Uncodified Ordinance adopting and approving a policy to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition and reporting requirements for military equipment for first reading by title only and waive the full reading; and
(3) Authorize the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance, and the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with law.

Fiscal Impact
There is no new fiscal impact. Military Equipment is maintained within the department budget.

There will be Redding Police Department (RPD) staff related expenses required to track and prepare the mandated annual report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could decline to approve the RPD Military Equipment Report (Report) and the proposed ordinance, and provide staff with additional direction.

Background/Analysis
California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481), codified at Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, requires RPD to give an annual update on the funding, acquisition and use of military equipment. The first initial report was submitted to City Council on April 19, 2022, for an adoption of uncodified Ordinance No. 2647 on May 3, 2022.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.9(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.9(b)--Consider the Redding Police Department Military Equipment Report; and Uncodified Ordinance to provide guidelines regarding military equipment pursuant to Assembly Bill 481.

Brian Barner, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 449
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment Page 2
The second annual report was submitted to City Council on June 20, 2023, for an adoption of uncodified Ordinance No. 2661 on July 18, 2023.

The term “military equipment,” as used in AB 481, does not necessarily indicate equipment used by the military. Items deemed to be “military equipment” include, but are not limited to unmanned aerial or ground vehicles, armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, breaching equipment, kinetic energy weapons and munitions, patrol rifles, tear gas/munitions, and noise flash diversionary devices. The list of items considered “military equipment” by AB 481 are used by most law enforcement agencies across the country as best practice to enhance citizen and officer safety.

Attached is the annual Redding Police Department Military Equipment Report, which includes an inventory of the military equipment maintained by RPD. The use of military equipment identified on the inventory list is vital to RPD’s mission and will continue to be strictly regulated through internal process and oversight.

RPD Policy 707 and AB 481 information has been posted on the RPD website since March 2, 2022, for public viewing. The website includes a reporting tool for concerns. There have been no citizen complaints or inquires made in the past two years regarding the use of military equipment.

In addition, RPD held a Community Meeting on Monday May 13, 2024, to discuss AB 481 and the equipment it maintains.

Environmental Review
This item is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, therefore, no further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety- “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding”. • Communication and Transparency- “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
^DRAFT Ordinance Military Equipment_2024
^2024 AB 481 Report
Packet Pg. 450

DRAFT NEW ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING A POLICY TO PROVIDE

GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL, ACQUISITION AND

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, which relates to the use of military equipment by state and local law enforcement agencies; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481, codified at Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, inclusive, and as applied to cities, requires local law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of a military equipment use policy prior to taking any action which supports the acquisition and use of military equipment; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 7071 requires approval of a military equipment use policy by ordinance at a regular meeting of the City Council; and WHEREAS, it further provides that the military equipment use policy must be made publicly available on the law enforcement agency’s internet website for no less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to adoption of the same by ordinance; and WHEREAS, subdivision (e) of Government Code section 7071 further requires that the City Council review any such ordinance at least annually after having considered the report required by Government Code section 7072; and
WHEREAS, the proposed military equipment use policy for the Redding Police Department Policy 707, is attached and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, Redding Policy Department Policy 707 was published on the Redding Police Department’s internet website on March 2, 2022, and was provided to the City Council on the same day; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2647 on May 3, 2022, whereby Redding Police Department Policy 707 was, approved, adopted and found to meet all requirements under the law.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Determinations and Orders.

Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: ^DRAFT Ordinance Military Equipment_2024 (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD 2 1. Redding Police Department Policy 707 meets the requirements of subdivision (d) of Government Code section 7070 because substantial evidence in the record establishes that:

A. Policy 707 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and B. Policy 707 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties; and
C. The equipment set forth in Policy 707 is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civil safety.

2. Redding Police Department Policy 707 is approved and adopted.

3. The Chief of Police shall produce the annual military equipment report required by Government Code section 7072, publish the same on the Redding Police Department internet website, and provide the notice and public engagement required by subdivision (b) of Government Code 7072.

4. The Chief of Police shall, after undertaking all actions set forth in Section 3, herein, agendize consideration of the annual military equipment report for a regular meeting of the City Council.

5. The Chief of Police shall, no later than ten months (10) months after the adoption of this ordinance, and every subsequent renewal of the same, cause consideration of an ordinance to renew this ordinance for an additional term of one (1) year to be agendized for first reading.

Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection subdivision paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections subdivisions paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 3. The City of Redding finds that this Ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061(b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment), the adoption of this ordinance is therefore not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: ^DRAFT Ordinance Military Equipment_2024 (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 21st day of May, 2024, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the ____ day of __________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney DATE ATTESTED: ________, 2024
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: ^DRAFT Ordinance Military Equipment_2024 (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD 777 CYPRESS AVE, REDDING CA. 96001 | WWW.reddingpolice.org

REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL

MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
REPORT
Dates Revised
May 8, 2024
May 30, 2023
April 6, 2022
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 2 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT OWNED MILITARY EQUIPMENT:

SECTION 1 – UNMANNED, REMOTELY PILOTED, POWERED AERIAL OR GROUND VEHICLES SECTION 3 – HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLES (HMMWV), TWO-AND-ONEHALF-TON TRUCKS, FIVE-TON TRUCKS, OR WHEELED VEHICLES THAT HAVE A BREACHING OR ENTRY APPARATUS ATTACHED.

SECTION 5 – COMMAND AND CONTROL VEHICLES THAT ARE EITHER BUILT OR MODIFIED TO FACILITATE THE OPERATIONAL CONTROL AND DIRECTION OF PUBLIC SAFETY UNITS.

SECTION 7 – BATTERING RAMS, SLUGS, AND BREACHING APPARATUSES THAT ARE EXPLOSIVE IN NATURE.

SECTION 8 & 9 – FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION OF .50 CALIBER OR GREATER.

SECTION 10 – SPECIALIZED FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION OF LESS THAN .50 CALIBER.

SECTION 12 – “FLASHBANG” GRENADES AND EXPLOSIVE BREACHING TOOLS, “TEAR GAS,” AND “PEPPER BALLS.”
SECTION 14 – 40MM PROJECTIVE LAUNCHERS, “BEAN BAG,” RUBBER BULLET, AND SPECIALTY IMPACT MUNITIONS (SIM) WEAPONS.

Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 3 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024)

UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS)
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(1): Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: Remotely piloted aerial vehicle capable of providing live and recorded video images captured from aerial positions, including images enhanced by Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR), thermal, and optical zoom lenses.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

Costs associated with replacement/repair of equipment is approximated at $5,000; the price of the UAS is based upon each specific model. The most expensive UAS is the Matrice 300 with a cost of approximately $35,000 for all attachments, cameras, etc.

The allotted annual Redding Police Department UAS budget is $20,000. In year 2023-24 Approximately $11,000 of funding was spent. Two smaller DJI Avatas drones were newly purchased for $6,650 combined.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: The use of UAS is in accordance with Redding Police Department Policy 606 and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Unmanned aerial systems may be utilized to enhance the Redding Police Department’s mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. Any use of a UAS will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.

TRAINING REQUIRED: UAS will only be operated on deployment by department personnel who possess a valid Remote Pilot Certificate and have received department approved training in operation, applicable laws, policies, and procedures regarding the use of the UAS.

OTHER: UAS consistently improve and advance from year to year. There may be times when equipment becomes available that are imperative for successfully operating the fleet while technology becomes obsolete.

PRODUCTS IN UAS FLEET & DESCRIPTION: The following make up the UAS fleet for the Redding Police Department. All products are manufactured by DJI and include commercial-grade and civilian models. Commonly used by construction and utility companies for the inspection of buildings, powerlines, windmills and other infrastructure. All UAS are battery powered, remote operated devices. Operators utilize a handheld controller to control UAS and view live feed from UAS-mounted camera. Flight time varies by model, but average approximately 30 minutes per battery, depending on weather and flight conditions. The UAS has also proven to be useful to public safety agencies in firefighting, search and rescue, pre-operational surveillance, and other tactical situations where aerial views enhance the safety and efficiency of law enforcement and fire personnel. The Redding Police Department utilizes the following UAS models:

Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 4 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) DJI MATRICE 210(S)
QUANTITY 2 UNITS
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST GENERAL MAINTENANCE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW
DJI MATRICE 300(S)
QUANTITY 2 UNITS
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST GENERAL MAINTENANCE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW
DJI MAVIC 2(S)
QUANTITY 3 UNITS
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST GENERAL MAINTENANCE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW
DJI PHANTOM 4(S)
QUANTITY 1 UNIT
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST GENERAL MAINTENANCE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 5 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024)

DJI SPARK
QUANTITY 1 UNIT
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST GENERAL MAINTENANCE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW

DJI MAVIC MINI(S)
QUANTITY 2 UNITS
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST GENERAL MAINTENANCE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW

DJI AVATAS
UAS DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY:

REMARKS 20 DEPLOYMENTS IN 2023-24
- 2 INVESTIGATIONS
- 1SEARCH & ARREST WARRANTS
- 5 CRIME SCENE DOCUMENTATION
- 2 SUSPECT SEARCHES
- 3 COMMUNITY CLEANUP OPERATIONS
- 3 SPECIAL EVENTS/DEMOS
- 3 SWAT OPERATIONS
- 1 MISSING PERSON INVESTIGATION
QUANTITY 2 UNITS
LIFESPAN 5+ YEARS
2023-24 COST $6,650 FOR NEW PURCHASE

REMARKS SEE SUMMARY BELOW
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 6 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) LENCO BEARCAT G2
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(3): High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The vehicle is equipped with emergency lights/sirens, rotating roof hatch, running boards, protection against chemical agents, back-up camera, battering ram attachment, and spot/flood lights. The vehicle is armored with a 0.5 – 1.5” thick steel and ballistic windows rated to stop a .50 caliber bullet.

FISCAL IMPACTS: The cost of the BearCat G2 was approximately $309,035 which was purchased in 2019 by the Hilltop Business Group for the City of Redding. The cost to maintain the Bearcat is approximately $2,500 annually in the form of general maintenance and equipment.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: The use of the Lenco BearCat G2 is governed by Redding Police Department Policy 706.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: The BearCat is primarily used for Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Team incidents, safe transport of SWAT personnel to and from critical incidents, high risk warrant service operations, dangerous high-risk tactical operations, high risk rescue operations, training, community engagement efforts and any other applications deemed appropriate and approved by the SWAT Commander, Division Commander or Chief of Police.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Officers are to be trained in the operation of the BearCat prior to use.

Training requirements will be set by the SWAT Commander and will include knowledge of the listed policy, rules of the road and basic knowledge of electronic/mechanical functions on the vehicle. The training will also include a driving exercise. SWAT personnel will receive advanced training and are expected to maintain a higher level of operational knowledge and expertise.

Only Redding Police Department personnel who have completed training and possess a valid California Driver’s License will be authorized to drive/operate the BearCat, unless a delayed deployment of the BearCat would result in serious bodily injury or death.

The SWAT Commander, or his/her designee, is responsible for training officers on proper use, driving techniques and ensuring the vehicle is properly serviced and maintained.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The Lenco BearCat is the standard tactical armored vehicle for special operations units within the US Law Enforcement community. Since the early 2000s, agencies such as LAPD, LASD SEB, NYPD ESU, Boston PD and hundreds of Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement agencies have made the BearCat part of their standard operating procedure. The G2 has excellent on-road driving characteristics and maneuverability in tight urban settings. The large floor plan seats 10 – 12 fully equipped officers.

OTHER: The vehicle is designed to meet the tactical needs of law enforcement agencies tasked with responding to acts of violence and/or terrorism.

Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 7 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) QUANTITY 1
LIFESPAN 15+ YEARS
2023-24 COST LESS THAN $2,500 IN MAINTENANCE
REMARKS 17 DEPLOYMENTS IN 2023-24
- 6 PATROL RESPONSES
- 7 PUBLIC EVENTS
- 3 SWAT OPERATIONS
- 1 OUT OF COUNTY REQUESTS

MOBILE COMMAND VEHICLE (MCV)
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(5): Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The mobile command vehicle provides mobile, remote access to radio, internet planning and operational resources to assist with the command and control of major incidents and other planned operations. The vehicle also has the capability to dispatch officers and firefighters, as well as receive emergency calls.

FISCAL IMPACTS: The initial costs of the MCV was approximately $560,040 which was purchased in 2021 with funding from the Redding Electric Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plan. The cost to maintain the mobile command vehicle is approximately $12,000 annually in the form of general maintenance, equipment and storage.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: Redding Police Department allows the use of the MCV with the approval of the Division Commander. A Class C license is required to drive the vehicle.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: The MCV can be deployed for any fire, police, and/or utility incidents which it would be deemed beneficial to do so.

TRAINING REQUIRED: A Class C license is required to drive the vehicle. The Redding Police Department supervisor assigned to the MCV will ensure operators are trained in the operation and functions of the MCV. Trained personnel will operate the MCV and will be assigned to the vehicle during operations to facilitate its operation.

Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 8 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The City of Redding Mobile Command Vehicle was built in conjunction with the Redding Fire Department, Redding Police Department, and Redding Electric Utility as a unified command vehicle but can also alternate between fire, police, and utility for department specific missions. The vehicle was custom built by LDV Manufacturing in Wisconsin in 2021.

OTHER: The MCV is not a tactical vehicle but rather a multi-purpose vehicle to help facilitate command and control during field incidents in the City of Redding. The vehicle does not have any armor nor isit deployed in such a manner as to be used in such a way. The vehicle is to be deployed at the periphery of a tactical incident if one such arises.

ENERGETIC EXPLOSIVE BREACHING
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(7): Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: Energetic breaching is used to gain rapid access to a room or structure when an emergent law enforcement need exists. All efforts are made to minimize the amount of energetics applied to a target, while still achieving a positive breach. Energetic breaching materials are used to make breaching charges of various shapes and strength which are QUANTITY 1
LIFESPAN 15+ YEARS
2023-24 COST APPROXIMATELY $12,000 IN STORAGE,

MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES
REMARKS 5 DEPLOYMENTS IN 2023-24
- 4 PUBLIC EVENTS
- 1 SWAT OPERATION
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 9 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) specifically designed for the target. The materials release gasses, heat, and light when initiated.

The pressure from the gasses released presses against mediums and/or the target to cause the structure of the target to fail for a successful breach. Breaching charges are specially designed to cause structural failure of the desired target. Various types, configurations, and energetic weights are maintained for use, as needed.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Initial startup was funded by department SWAT budget – estimated $2,500.

Future fiscal impact: 25 grain detonation cord, 50 grain detonation cord, blasting caps and percussion primers – approximately $2,000 to $3000 per year. In 2023-2024 there was no cost to the explosive breaching program.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: Explosive breaching is commanded by the SWAT Commander and procedures are outlined under Redding Police Department Policy 404.

Explosive breaching may only occur after authorization by the SWAT Commander in the field, and during training exercises.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES:It is the standard operating procedure of the Redding Police Department Special Weapon and Tactics (SWAT) Team to utilize a SWAT team member or member of the Shasta County Bomb Team who has attended the necessary training required to provide the option of explosive breaching. Explosive breaching is a SWAT Team tactical option and can be employed when a rapid entry is critical to the success of the SWAT mission.

Explosive breaching should only be considered after other reasonable methods or procedures have been exhausted or deemed inappropriate. Explosive breaching can provide a sufficient tactical advantage which should also be considered to justify its use. An explosive breach should be viewed as a breaching tool to be used in dangerous situations with minimal risk to officers and occupants of target structures. Explosive breaching techniques may not be appropriate in all breaching situations. An explosive breach should not be employed in the following circumstances:
a. The construction of walls, doors or the building is not known. b. The location of the occupants/victims is not known.
c. There is a known presence of unstable chemicals or other incendiary materials.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Explosive breaching personnel shall train with SWAT at minimum two times annually and often enough to be proficient in the practice of explosive breaching. All explosive breaching personnel shall attend a certified breaching school.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The detonating cord is a thin, flexible plastic tube usually filled with pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN, pentrite). With the PETN exploding at a rate of approximately 6400 m/s, any common length of detonation cord appears to explode instantaneously. It is a high-speed fuse which explodes, rather than burns, and is suitable for detonating high explosives.

A blasting cap is a small sensitive primary explosive device generally used to detonate a larger, more powerful and less sensitive secondary explosive such as TNT, dynamite, or plastic explosive.

Blasting caps come in a variety of types, including non-electric caps, electric caps, and fuse caps.

Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 10 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) OTHER: Explosive breaching is utilized only by the Redding Police Department SWAT Team.

QUANTITY 629 FEET OF DETONATING CORD
(50 GRAINS PER FOOT)
61 BLASTING CAPS
33 PERCUSSION PRIMERS

4.9 POUNDS OF SHEET EXPLOSIVE
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
2023-24 COST $0
REMARKS NO DEPLOYMENTS, 2 TRAININGS
REMINGTON BREACHING SHOTGUN MODEL 870, 12–GAUGE &

AMMUNITION
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(7): Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: To quickly force entry through locked and/or barricaded doors, the department authorizes the use of the breaching shotgun. The use of the breaching shotgun allows officers to defeat doors that mechanical breaching tools would normally be unable to open.

The primary function of the breaching shotgun is for forcing entry. Although the breaching shotgun is a firearm, it has been modified for breaching purposes. Additionally, the selected ammunition is frangible and designed to defeat door locks and hinges.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Less than $250 annually funded by the department SWAT budget.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: The use of the breaching shotgun is governed by Redding Police Department Policy 404.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: When a decision has been made to conduct an emergency entry, the breaching shotgun may only be used when it appears reasonably necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury. Officers are also required to obtain the approval of a supervisor unless the circumstances make it impractical to obtain authorization and/or delayed response would jeopardize the safety of citizens, officers or suspect(s).

TRAINING REQUIRED: The training for the use of the breaching shotgun is governed by Redding Police Department Policy 404. All training and proficiency for the breaching shotgun will be documented by the SWAT Commander.

Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 11 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: Starting with a receiver machined from an 8 ½ – pound billet of steel might not be the easiest way to build a shotgun, but the end result is well worth the extra effort. No other pump shotgun can match the Model 870's strength and smooth, effortless operation. Its legendary reliability is the heart of its popularity, as evidenced by the more than 13 million outdoorsmen, law enforcement officers, competitive shooters and home defenders who have chosen the never-say-die pump gun since its introduction in 1950. That same reliability has made the Model 870 one of the most adaptable shotgun designs ever, and the best-selling shotgun of all time.

Hornady 12 Gauge breaching round frangible ¾ oz slug is designed to fit a variety of mission applications including entry (limited penetration), breaching, and training. It features a ¾ ounce frangible sintered slug.

OTHER: Breaching shotguns are specifically assigned and utilized by the Redding Police Department SWAT Team.

QUANTITY 2 REMINGTON BREACHING SHOTGUNS
35 HORNADY ¾ OZ BREACHING ROUNDS
15 DEF TECH T.K.O.BREACHING ROUNDS
LIFESPAN 15 – 20 YEARS
2023-24 COST NO COST
REMARKS ONE DEPLOYMENT, 1 TRAINING
ARMALITE, AR-50A1 .50 CALIBER RIFLE & AMMUNITION
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(8) & § 7070 (c)(9): Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The AR-50A1 rifle is a large caliber rifle that allows for specific uses by our SWAT Team. The capability of the large caliber allows for the penetration of ballistic, steel armor in a critical incident.

FISCAL IMPACTS: No cost. This rifle was obtained in 2010 via citizen forfeiture and retained per § 34005(b) of the Penal Code.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force, SWAT, and Firearms.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Use of the .50 caliber Sniper Rifle per Redding Police Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 12 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) Department Policy 404.
a. SWAT members must obtain SWAT Commander approval prior to training with the .50 caliber rifle. Training must be at sites approved by the SWAT Commander. b. The rifle should only be deployed by a crisis with SWAT Commander approval unless exigent circumstances justify an immediate deployment.
c. Only trained officers may deploy the rifle.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Training and qualification with the rifle will be the responsibility of the SWAT Commander. Only those SWAT members that have trained/qualified will deploy the rifle, when necessary.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The AR-50A1 is a single shot bolt action rifle chambered for the powerful .50 BMG cartridge. The rifle features a unique octagonal receiver and utilizes ArmaLite's proprietary V-Channel chassis. Designed for the challenges of long-range shooting, the AR-50A1 is exceptionally accurate with a highly effective muzzle brake.

OTHER: This rifle is assigned to the Redding Police Department SWAT Team.

PWS MK1 .223 RIFLE
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(10): Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The PWS MK1 rifle is a semi-automatic rifle defined in § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Approximately $1,250 per rifle purchased by the department budget in 2018.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

QUANTITY 1 RIFLE
236 ROUNDS OF AMMUNITION .50 BMG
LIFESPAN 10 + YEARS
2023-24 COST NO COST

REMARKS NO DEPLOYMENTS OR TRAININGS
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 13 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Officers may deploy the rifle in any circumstance within Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The PWS MK1 is a magazine fed, gas/piston operated rifle available in .223 caliber and fires from a rotating locking closed bolt.

OTHER: These specific rifles are assigned to Redding Police Department SWAT Team.

QUANTITY 19 RIFLES
LIFESPAN 10 + YEARS
2023-24 COST NO COST

REMARKS N/A
PWS MK1 PRO LOWERS
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(10): Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The PWS MK1 Pro Lower is a semi-automatic rifle defined in § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Approximately $500 per rifle lower purchased by the department budget. No future fiscal impacts applicable.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Officers may deploy the rifle in any circumstance within Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The PWS MK1 is a magazine fed, gas/piston Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 14 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) operated rifle available in .223 caliber and fires from a rotating locking closed bolt.

OTHER: These specific rifles are assigned to Redding Police Department Traffic Unit and are modified to fit with their police motorcycles.

QUANTITY 5 RIFLES
LIFESPAN 10 + YEARS
2023-24 COST APPROXIMATELY $2,500

REMARKS N/A
CMMG AR-10 CARBINE RIFLE
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(10): Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES:The CMMG AR-10 carbine rifle is a semi-automatic rifle defined in § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code.

FISCAL IMPACTS: No cost. This rifle was obtained in 2016 through evidence retention per § 34005(b) PC.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: This rifle is specifically assigned to the SWAT Team and may be deployed in any circumstance within Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force, SWAT, and Firearms.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Training and qualification with the rifle will be the responsibility of the SWAT Commander. Only those SWAT members that have trained/qualified will deploy the rifle, when necessary.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The CMMG AR-10 carbine is a magazine fed, inertia/recoil operated rifle available in .308 caliber and fires from a closed chamber.

OTHER: This specific rifle is assigned to Redding Police Department SWAT Team.

QUANTITY 1 RIFLE
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 15 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) LIFESPAN 10 + YEARS
2023-24 COST NO COST

REMARKS N/A
LOYAL 9 MANUFACTURING M4-EX03
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(10): Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The Loyal 9 M4-EX03 is a semi-automatic rifle defined in § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Purchased on April 4, 2022 with department budget, approved by Redding City Council on March 15, 2022 for 60 rifles for a cost of $83,976.75. An additional purchase of 34 rifles was completed on October 24, 2023 for a cost $47,222.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Officers may deploy the rifle in any circumstance within Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Officers must successfully complete a CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course as well as regular department firearms training and qualifications as required by law and policy.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The Loyal 9 M4-EX03 is a magazine fed, gas operated rifle available in .223 caliber and fires from a rotating locking closed bolt.

OTHER: These rifles replaced the patrol rifles obtained with the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office (DRMO) program. The 57 DRMO rifles were returned in 2022-2023.

Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 16 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) QUANTITY 94 RIFLES
LIFESPAN 10 + YEARS
2023-24 COST $47,222

REMARKS ASSIGNED TO ALL OFFICERS
AMMUNITION – .223 & .308
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(10): Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: Ammunition used for the AR-15 style carbine rifle defined in § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Approximately $35,000 annually purchased with department budget.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various Redding Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Firearms.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Ammunition used for the AR-15 style carbine rifle defined in § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Officers attend a 16-hour Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Certified Rifle Course for deployment of department rifles and use of ammunition.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:

Federal American Eagle Ammunition is designed specifically for target shooting, training and practice. This ammo is loaded to the same specifications as Federal's Premium loads, but at a more practical price for economical practicing. This ammunition is new production in reloadable brass cases.

Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 17 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) CALIBER .223
BRAND / GRAIN FEDERAL / 55 GRAIN
QUANTITY 500 ROUNDS
2023-24 COST NONE
Hornady TAP Urban .223 duty ammunition features a 55-grain match grade, polymer tipped, fragmenting bullet. The cartridge offers high velocity and performance similar to that of other polymer tipped Hornady .223 bullets. The cartridge has a match grade brass composite shell casing and a small rifle, staked primer pocket.

CALIBER .223
BRAND / GRAIN HORNADY / 55 FMJ TRAINING
QUANTITY 19,000 ROUNDS
2023-24 COST $36,250
CALIBER .308
BRAND / GRAIN FEDERAL TACTICAL / 168 GRAIN
QUANTITY 4,250 ROUNDS
2023-24 COST $3,750
Federal Cartridge .308 Win Tactical Bonded Tip 168 Grain Duty Ammunition is made exclusively for law enforcement and achieves accuracy and terminal performance unmatched by any other ammunition. Designed to defeat the toughest barriers with minimal deflection, Tactical Bonded Tip ammo has quickly become the choice for some of the most intense conditions.

CALIBER .308
BRAND / GRAIN FEDERAL BONDED / 168 GRAIN
QUANTITY 220 ROUNDS
2023-24 COST $400
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 18 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024)

CS GAS SYSTEMS
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(12): “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The use of CS gas causes mucous membranes and exposed skin to become inflamed resulting in a burning sensation. It provides a temporary respiratory effect and induces discomfort on exposed skin.

FISCAL IMPACTS: Approximately $5,000 annually purchased with department budget. In 2023- 2024 only $400 was spent on chemical agents.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: The use of this equipment is governed by Redding Police Department Policy 407.7.2(b).

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: CS gas is utilized during confrontations with violent or potentially violent suspects as a less lethal option to assist with the dispersal of violent crowds and/or arrest of suspects.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Specialized training as deemed by the SWAT Commander and CA POST certified department chemical agent instructors.

OTHER: Recognizing that the missions of the SWAT Team are performed in a hazardous environment, and recognizing that the safety of innocent persons, officers, and suspects is often jeopardized by the hazardous conditions, it shall be the intent of SWAT to utilize special equipment in an attempt to lessen the risk of injury or death to all involved during the performance of a SWAT operation. The SWAT Commander will ensure that only those team members properly trained and certified in the use of the special equipment will utilize the equipment.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS:

The Defense Technology Spede-Heat™ CS/Kinetic: a high volume, continuous burn it expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds. The payload is discharged through four gas ports on top of the canister, three on the side and one on the bottom. This launchable grenade is 6.12 in. by 2.62 in. and holds approximately 2.9 oz. of active agent.

BRAND DEF-TECH SPEDE-HEAT CS
QUANTITY 8
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 19 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) The Defense Technology Ferret® 40 mm and 12-gauge round: non-burning and suitable for indoor use. Used primarily by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle. In a tactical deployment situation, the Ferret is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas. Its purpose is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects.

BRAND DEF-TECH 40 MM FERRET ROUND CS
DEF-TECH 12-GAUGE FERRET ROUND CS
QUANTITY 4 ROUNDS OF 40 MM
50 ROUNDS OF 12-GAUGE
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
REMARKS 1 SWAT OPERATION DEPLOYMENT
CTS 5230B CS Baffled Canister: Pyrotechnic grenade designed for indoor use delivering a maximum amount of irritant smoke throughout multiple rooms with minimal risk of fire.

Launchable.

BRAND CTS 5230B LAUNCHABLE CS
QUANTITY 17
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
CTS 5230 CS Canister: Large diameter burning grenade that discharges a high volume of smoke and chemical agent through multiple emission ports. Specifically, for outdoor use and should not be deployed on rooftops, in crawl spaces or indoors due to potential fire hazard. Can be hand thrown or launched. Discharge duration can reach up to 40 seconds.

BRAND CTS 5230 NON-LAUNCHABLE CS
QUANTITY 15
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
CTS 5230JL CS Canister: A large diameter burning grenade designed to discharge a high volume of smoke and chemical agent rapidly through multiple emission ports. The smoke composition is formulated to burn rapidly decreasing the possibility that the grenade can be picked up and thrown back at crowd management officers. The Jet-Lite should not be deployed on rooftops, in crawl spaces or indoors due to fire producing capability. Can be hand thrown or launched.

Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 20 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) BRAND CTS 5230JL
QUANTITY 10
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
CLEAROUT Tear Gas Grenade delivers enough CS to reach incapacitating level established by military tests to an area of 23,000 cubic feet with an equal amount of OC. Recent tests of OC alone have established its effectiveness though no incapacitating concentration has been determined.

BRAND CLEAROUT TEAR GAS GRENADE
QUANTITY 5 CANISTERS OF 2 OZ. & 4 CANISTERS OF 6 OZ.

LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
REMARKS 2 DEPLOYMENTS
Defense Technology 40 mm Launcher: The 40LMTS is a tactical single shot launcher that features an expandable ROGERS Super Stoc and an adjustable Integrated Front Grip (IFG) with light rail.

The ambidextrous Lateral Sling Mount (LSM) and QD mounting systems allow both a single- and two-point sling attachment. The 40LMTS will fire standard 40 mm less lethal ammunition, up to

4.8 inches in cartridge length. The Picatinny Rail Mounting System will accept a wide array of enhanced optics/sighting systems.

BRAND DEF-TECH 40 MM LAUNCHER
QUANTITY 2
LIFESPAN 10+ YEARS
Remington Shotgun Launcher: Starting with a receiver machined from an 8 ½ – pound billet of steel might not be the easiest way to build a shotgun, but the end result is well worth the extra effort. No other pump shotgun can match the Model 870'sstrength and smooth, effortless operation.

Its legendary reliability is the heart of its popularity, as evidenced by the more than 13 million outdoorsmen, law enforcement officers, competitive shooters and home defenders who have chosen the never-say-die pump gun since its introduction in 1950. That same reliability has made the Model 870 one of the most adaptable shotgun designs, and the best-selling shotgun of all time.

Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 21 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) BRAND REMINGTON 870 LAUNCHERS
QUANTITY 4
LIFESPAN 10+ YEARS

CTS & DTS DIVERSIONARY DEVICES
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(12): “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The use of this device is to create a light/sound diversion during critical incidents. The device utilizes a loud bang and emits a bright light made to disorient the suspect(s).

FISCAL IMPACTS: There was no cost for 2023-2024 associated with the use of diversionary devices.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: The use of diversionary devices is governed by Redding Police Department Policy 404.

PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: Used during critical incidents as to distract, disorient and illuminate suspects.

TRAINING REQUIRED: Specialized training as deemed by the SWAT Commander and CA POST certified Department Diversionary Device Instructors.

OTHER: Recognizing that the missions of the SWAT Team are performed in a hazardous environment, and recognizing that the safety of innocent persons, officers, and suspects is often jeopardized by the hazardous conditions, it shall be the intent of SWAT to utilize special equipment in an attempt to lessen the risk of injury or death to all involved during the performance of a SWAT operation. The SWAT Commander will ensure that only those team members properly trained and certified in the use of the special equipment will utilize the equipment.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: The diversionary device utilizes a M201A1 type fuse with a single use aluminum body. This compact unit is designed around a 6.5-gram water resistant charge, capable of producing an effective, yet reduced 162dB stimuli. Its size and shape are industry familiar and allow it to fit in standard tactical pouches. The device should only be deployed in areas that have been visually observed to be clear of potential hazards. It is recommended that the immediate area for deployment be visually affirmed to be clear of personnel and that the device is delivered so that the ports are free from obstruction. If the bottom ports are obstructed by an object or wall, the device body may move. The cleared area for deployment should be 5 - 6 feet around which the device is expected to come to rest.

Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 22 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024)

BRAND CTS MINI DIVERSIONARY DEVICE
QUANTITY 36
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS

BRAND CTS LOW ROLL DEVICE
QUANTITY 10
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS

BRAND DEF TECH LOW ROLL DEVICE
QUANTITY 1
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS

BRAND CTS TRAINING DIVERSIONARY

DEVICE FUSE
QUANTITY 11
LIFESPAN 5 YEARS
DEF-TECH 40 MM KINETIC ENERGY LAUNCHER & PROJECTILES
CA GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070 (c)(14): The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40 mm projectile launchers, “bean bag,” rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.

EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES: The Redding Police Department is committed to reducing the potential for violent confrontations. Kinetic energy projectiles, when used properly, are less likely to result in death orserious physical injury and can be used in an attempt to de-escalate a potentially deadly situation. Department approved kinetic energy projectiles are fired from 40 mm launchers.

FISCAL IMPACTS: $809.75 per 40 mm launcher when purchased. There were no costs associated with the launchers in 2023-24.

LEGAL & PROCEDURAL RULES GOVERNING USE: The use of 40 mm kinetic energy projectile is governed by Redding Police Department Policy 302.

Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 23 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) PURPOSE & AUTHORIZED USES: A sworn peace officer may utilize the Kinetic Energy Projectile in the discharge of their duties when other options have been exhausted, are ineffective, or are inappropriate during attempts to control or subdue combative or violent individuals and the use of deadly force can be forestalled.

The Kinetic Energy Projectile shall be used with discretion and care in circumstances which permit the lawful use of lethal or less lethal force.

TRAINING REQUIRED: The SWAT Commander shall ensure that all personnel who are authorized to carry a 40 mm control device have been properly trained and certified to carry the specific control device and are retrained or recertified as necessary.

Proficiency training shall be monitored and documented by a certified, control-device weapons instructor. All training and proficiency for control devices will be documented.

OTHER: 40 mm kinetic energy projectile launcher and projectiles are assigned to the Redding Police Department SWAT Team.

MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:

The 40LMTS is a tactical single shot launcher that features an expandable ROGERS Super Stoc and an adjustable Integrated Front Grip (IFG) with light rail. The ambidextrous Lateral Sling Mount (LSM) and QD mounting systems allow both a single- and two-point sling attachment. The 40LMTS will fire standard 40 mm less lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. The Picatinny Rail Mounting System will accept a wide array of enhanced optics/sighting systems.

BRAND DEF-TECH 40 MM LAUNCHER
QUANTITY 1
LIFESPAN 10 YEARS
The CTS-4557 Sponge Baton is a spin-stabilized projectile delivering blunt trauma effect.

Although it is extremely accurate and consistent, accuracy is dependent on the launcher, using open sights vs. An improved sight, environmental conditions, and the operator. Effectiveness depends on many variables, such as distance, clothing, stature, and the point where the projectile impacts.

BRAND CTS–4557 40 MM SPONGE BATON
QUANTITY 9
LIFESPAN 10 YEARS
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment) 24 | P age
REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT – ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT (JUNE 2023– MAY 2024) Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: ^2024 AB 481 Report (9.9(b)--Ordinance re Military Equipment Guidelines and Annual Update on RPD Military Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact by accepting the Quarterly General Fund Financial Report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to reject the report and request additional or different information.

Background/Analysis
The General Fund Quarterly Financial Report is for review and information purposes only. There are two primary components of the report: first is the comparison of revenues budget to actual year to date and second is the comparison of expenditures budget to actual year to date. The revenue analysis provides a breakdown utilizing the projected revenues through March 2024, compared to the actual revenues received. The expenditure analysis provides a breakdown utilizing the projected expenditures through March 2024, compared to the actual expenditures paid.

Revenues
General Fund revenues through March 31, 2024, totals $67,419,406 which is $1,640,018 or 2.4% below staff’s cash flow projection of $69,059,424. Staff is not recommending any changes to projected revenues at this time.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.10(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended March 2024
Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 478
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report Page 2 Below is a breakdown of the results by revenue type for the General Fund through March 31, 2024.

Actual Budget Variance
Variance
%
Operating Revenues $ 24 $ - $ 24 100.00%
Tax Revenues $47,525,051 $49,489,301 $(1,964,250) -3.97% Licenses & Permits $ 1,479,799 $ 1,793,511 $ (313,712) -17.49% Fines & Penalties $ 2,543,491 $ 717,205 $ 1,826,286 254.64% PILOT & Transfers $ 9,730,020 $ 9,730,020 $ 0 0.00%
Revenue from Other Government Agencies $ 2,008,759 $ 2,224,932 $ (216,173) -9.72% Total Other Revenues $ 2,876,926 $ 1,877,721 $ 999,205 53.21% Charges for Current Services $ 615,044 $ 2,576,673 $(1,961,629) -76.13% Property Rental & Investment Income $ 640,292 $ 650,061 $ (9,769) -1.50% Total $67,419,406 $69,059,424 $(1,640,018) -2.37%
Fines & Penalties includes Cannabis Fines, which include written off balances for lack of collections or collectability. The write off component is displayed under Charges for Current Services.

Below is a breakdown of the tax revenues through March 31, 2024. Tax revenues are the primary revenue source which fund General Fund operations.

Actual Budget Variance Variance %
Property Taxes 16,050,496 15,424,683 625,813 4.06%
Sales Tax 23,459,188 24,447,529 (988,341) -4.04%
TOT 5,427,346 6,088,339 (660,993) -10.86%
Cannabis 956,985 1,571,250 (614,265) -39.09%
Other Taxes 1,631,036 1,957,500 (326,464) -16.68%
Total 47,525,051 49,489,301 (1,964,250) -3.97%
Overall, tax revenues are 3.97 percent below staff projections or $1,964,250. The next major installment of property taxes will be received the week of May 20, 2024, and will be reflected on the next quarterly report. While staff is not recommending any changes at this time it is likely that during the mid-cycle/fiscal year end update that staff will recommend adjustments to these revenues for Fiscal year 2023-24, 2024-25, and associated future years of the General Fund TenYear Plan.

Expenses
The City of Redding (City) has expended $93,056,195 from the General Fund through March 31, 2024. This level of expenditure represents 47.9 percent of total appropriations, and is $6,550,827 or 6.6 percent below staff’s cash flow estimate of $99,607,022 through March 31, 2024. Below is a breakdown of expense by department compared to budget:

Packet Pg. 479
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report Page 3 Actual Budget Variance Variance %
General Government 7,591,879 7,383,340 (208,539) -2.82% Non Dept, Mid town, Debt Service & Animal Reg 2,562,135 4,651,533 2,089,398 44.92% Development Services 4,812,751 5,098,619 285,869 5.61%
PW 12,095,717 16,550,106 4,454,389 26.91%
Police 36,105,788 36,769,580 663,792 1.81%
Fire 23,373,761 21,389,506 (1,984,255) -9.28%
Parks 6,514,165 7,764,338 1,250,173 16.10%
Total 93,056,195 99,607,022 6,550,827 6.58%
No adjustments are being recommended to expenditures at this time. If at the end of the fiscal year there are any required adjustments those will be presented to council with the mid cycle update after completion of Fiscal Year 2023-24.

General Fund Reserves
As of March 31, 2024, the General Fund cash balance was $14,618,295 or 13.6 percent. At year end, the ten-year plan projects the reserve to be 17.7 percent. The final reserve is subject to change dependent on revenue and expenditure outcomes. The final assessment of ending cash for the fiscal year will come upon completion of the annual audit. Staff is not recommending any changes to the projected reserve at this time.

General Fund Overtime
The City’s General Fund overtime expense totals $5,172,605 through March 31, 2024. This is $2,321,390 above staff’s cash flow estimate of $2,851,215. The expenditures year-to-date compared to the year-to-date budget are listed below, of which, the four largest overtime budgets are Fire, Police, Parks, and Streets:
• The Fire Department had overtime expenses through March 31, 2024, of $3,642,682 compared to a total overtime budget of $1,671,465; • The Police Department had overtime expenses through March 31, 2024, of $1,362,694 compared to a total overtime budget of $1,116,750; • The Community Services Department had overtime expenses through March 31, 2024, of $84,219 compared to a total overtime budget of $0. • The Public Works Department had overtime expenses through March 31, 2024, of $60,669 compared to a total overtime budget of $52,500; and • All other General Fund Departments had overtime expenses through March 31, 2024, of $22,341 compared to an overtime budget of $10,500.

Although some of the aforementioned expenses are either over budget or nearly over budget, there are no additional budget requests at this time. Each department has adequate savings in areas such as personnel charges and/or additional cross charges to other City departments, to offset the excess costs.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Packet Pg. 480
Report to Redding City Council May 14, 2024
Re: 9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report Page 4 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable Ten-Year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023
Packet Pg. 481
Amended Amended
23-24 24-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29
Beginning Cash Balance 21,000 18,977 16,718 9,674 5,940 1,506 Revenues 98,147 99,836 102,925 105,187 108,318 112,088
Net Transfers 7,237 7,019 7,529 7,955 8,194 8,440
Total Revenues 105,383 106,854 110,454 113,142 116,511 120,528 Personnel Costs (74,199) (75,943) (83,115) (82,088) (85,152) (87,649) Operating Costs (25,912) (26,184) (26,969) (27,778) (28,611) (29,470) Capital Outlay (7,107) (7,000) (7,210) (7,427) (7,650) (7,879) Debt Service (2,118) (1,957) (1,965) (1,318) (1,314) (1,313) Savings 1,931 1,971 1,761 1,736 1,782 1,830
Net Expenditures (107,406) (109,113) (117,499) (116,876) (120,946) (124,481) Ending Cash Balance 18,977 16,718 9,674 5,940 1,506 (2,448) Projections toward Council Objectives
Ending Cash as Percentage of
Expenditures 17.7% 15.3% 8.2% 5.1% 1.2% -2.0%
Projected Personnel Percentage 67.9% 68.4% 69.7% 69.2% 69.4% 69.4% Fiscal Year
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ending 2024 & 2025
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: ^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023 (9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34
Projected Cash Balance (2,448) (6,174) (9,098) (10,436) (10,749) Projected Revenues 115,432 118,883 122,453 126,150 129,975 Projected Net Transfers 8,693 8,954 9,222 9,499 9,784
Total Projected Revenues 124,124 127,837 131,675 135,649 139,759 Projected Personnel Costs (89,954) (91,765) (92,881) (94,660) (96,012) Projected Operating Costs (30,354) (31,265) (32,202) (33,169) (34,164) Projected Operating Costs (8,115) (8,359) (8,610) (8,868) (9,134) Projected Debt Service (1,310) (1,309) (1,311) (1,315) (1,132) Projected Savings 1,882 1,936 1,991 2,048 2,107
Net Projected Expenditures (127,851) (130,761) (133,012) (135,962) (138,334) Projected Ending Cash (6,174) (9,098) (10,436) (10,749) (9,324) Projections toward Council Objectives
Ending Cash as Percentage of
Expenditures -4.8% -7.0% -7.8% -7.9% -6.7%
Projected Personnel Percentage 69.3% 69.2% 68.8% 68.6% 68.4% Fiscal Year
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ending 2024 & 2025
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: ^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023 (9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Amended Amended
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29
Sales Tax 32,121 32,924 34,241 35,611 36,501 37,961
Property Tax 26,847 27,652 28,482 29,336 30,216 31,123
TOT 7,831 8,144 8,470 8,809 9,161 9,527
Cannabis Tax 2,095 2,145 2,231 2,320 2,413 2,509
Other Taxes 2,610 2,610 2,714 2,823 2,936 3,053
Licenses & Permits 2,391 2,532 2,633 2,739 2,848 2,962
Fines & Penalties 542 542 563 586 609 633
Other Government 2,625 2,729 2,360 1,153 1,188 1,223
Redding Rancheria 124 127 131 135 139 143
Internal Departments 14,248 13,675 14,086 14,508 14,943 15,392 Service Charges 3,436 3,606 3,750 3,900 4,056 4,219
Other Revenue 2,409 2,416 2,488 2,563 2,640 2,719
Use of Money & Property 742 609 609 609 609 609
Interest 125 125 167 97 59 15
Subtotal 99,836 98,147 102,925 105,187 108,318 112,088
Transfers In:

Gas Taxes 10,675 10,573 10,891 11,217 11,554 11,901
Debt Service - - - - - -
Other Transfers In 523 523 538 554 571 588
Total Transfers In 11,096 11,197 11,429 11,772 12,125 12,489 Transfers Out:

CVB & Convention Center (1,033) (1,035) (1,066) (1,098) (1,131) (1,165) Parking - - - - - -
Library (994) (1,024) (1,055) (1,086) (1,119) (1,153)
Rolling Stock (1,005) (1,080) (812) (637) (656) (676)
Other Equipment (395) (395) (407) (419) (432) (445)
Internal Advances - - - - - -
Other Transfers Out (533) (543) (559) (576) (594) (611) Total Transfers Out (4,077) (3,960) (3,900) (3,816) (3,931) (4,049) Net Transfers 7,019 7,237 7,529 7,955 8,194 8,440
Total Revenues 105,383 106,854 110,454 113,142 116,511 120,528 Revenue Assumptions
Sales Tax 2.5% 2.5% 4.0% 4.0% 2.5% 4.0%
Property Tax 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Fee Revenues Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Other Government Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Other Revenue Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Internal Departments Projected Projected 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% All Revenues (Not specific) Projected Projected 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Interest (Percent of Cash) 2.0% 2.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Fiscal Year Ended
Revenues
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Fiscal Year Ending 2024 & 2025
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: ^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023 (9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34
Sales Tax 38,910 39,883 40,880 41,902 42,949
Property Tax 32,056 33,018 34,008 35,029 36,080
TOT 9,908 10,305 10,717 11,146 11,591
Cannabis Tax 2,610 2,714 2,823 2,936 3,053
Other Taxes 3,175 3,302 3,435 3,572 3,715
Licenses & Permits 3,081 3,204 3,332 3,465 3,604
Fines & Penalties 659 685 713 741 771
Other Government 1,260 1,298 1,337 1,377 1,418
Redding Rancheria 147 151 156 161 165
Internal Departments 15,854 16,329 16,819 17,324 17,843 Service Charges 4,387 4,563 4,745 4,935 5,133
Other Revenue 2,800 2,884 2,971 3,060 3,152
Use of Money & Property 609 609 609 609 609
Interest (24) (62) (91) (104) (107)
Subtotal 115,432 118,883 122,453 126,150 129,975
Transfers In:

Gas Taxes 12,258 12,625 13,004 13,394 13,796
Debt Service - - - - -
Other Transfers In 606 624 643 662 682
Total Transfers In 12,863 13,249 13,647 14,056 14,478
Transfers Out:

CVB & Convention Center (1,200) (1,236) (1,273) (1,311) (1,350) Parking - - - - -
Library (1,187) (1,223) (1,259) (1,297) (1,336)
Rolling Stock (696) (717) (738) (760) (783)
Other Equipment (458) (472) (486) (500) (515)
Internal Advances - - - - -
Other Transfers Out (630) (649) (668) (688) (709)
Total Transfers Out (4,170) (4,295) (4,424) (4,557) (4,694) Net Transfers 8,954 8,693 9,222 9,499 9,784
Total Revenues 124,124 127,837 131,675 135,649 139,759
Revenue Assumptions
Sales Tax 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
Property Tax 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Fee Revenues 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Other Government 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Other Revenue 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Internal Departments 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
All Revenues (Not specific) 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Interest (Percent of Cash) 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
Fiscal Year Ended
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Revenues
Fiscal Year Ending 2024 & 2025
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: ^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023 (9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Amended Amended
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29
Safety UAL Payments 13,838 14,479 15,713 16,053
Misc UAL Payments 4,425 4,725 4,947 5,432
PARS UAL Payments 96 96 96 96
Police
Personnel 33,493 34,579 28,556 29,523 30,273 31,058
Operating 8,553 8,643 8,902 9,169 9,444 9,728
Capital Outlay/Project 182 72 74 76 78 80
Subtotal 43,293 42,227 37,532 38,768 39,796 40,866
Fire
Personnel 21,234 22,004 22,574 19,285 19,773 20,286
Operating 5,373 5,646 5,815 5,990 6,170 6,355
Capital Outlay/Project - 45 46 48 49 51
Subtotal 27,695 26,607 28,436 25,322 25,992 26,691
Transportation & Engineering
Personnel 2,759 2,708 709 720 732 743
Operating 4,275 4,203 4,329 4,459 4,593 4,731
Capital Outlay/Project 6,621 6,621 6,820 7,024 7,235 7,452 Subtotal 13,532 13,655 11,858 12,204 12,560 12,925
Parks & Recreation
Personnel 4,885 4,958 4,122 4,235 4,353 4,472
Operating 3,078 3,135 3,229 3,326 3,425 3,528
Capital Outlay/Project 135 94 96 99 102 105
Subtotal 8,186 8,098 7,447 7,660 7,880 8,106
Development Services
Personnel 5,153 5,092 3,710 3,808 3,911 4,014
Operating 1,125 1,123 1,157 1,191 1,227 1,264
Capital Outlay/Project - - - - - -
Subtotal 6,215 6,279 4,866 4,999 5,138 5,278
General Government & Other
Personnel 6,675 6,603 5,084 5,217 5,355 5,495
Operating 3,508 3,434 3,537 3,643 3,752 3,865
Capital Outlay/Project 169 169 174 180 185 191
Debt Service 2,118 1,957 1,965 1,318 1,314 1,313
Subtotal 12,164 12,471 10,761 10,358 10,607 10,864
Add Back Personnel - - - - - -
Add Back O&M - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Projected Savings (1,931) (1,971) (1,761) (1,736) (1,782) (1,830) Total Expenditures 107,406 109,113 117,499 116,876 120,946 124,481 Expenditure Assumptions
Personnel - Wages Budget Budget 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% O&M & Capital Outlay Budget Budget 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Debt Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual
Assumed Expense Savings 0.020 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Fiscal Year Ending 2024 & 2025
Fiscal Year Ended
Required Revenue or
Expenditure Adjustments
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Expenditures
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: ^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023 (9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34
Safety UAL Payments 16,403 16,193 15,525 15,309 14,884
Misc UAL Payments 5,545 5,661 5,498 5,479 5,195
PARS UAL Payments 96 96 96 96 96
Police
Personnel 31,923 32,814 33,728 34,670 35,637
Operating 10,020 10,320 10,630 10,949 11,277
Capital Outlay/Project 83 85 88 91 93
Subtotal 43,220 42,025 44,446 45,709 47,007
Fire
Personnel 20,852 21,434 22,032 22,647 23,279
Operating 6,545 6,742 6,944 7,152 7,367
Capital Outlay/Project 52 54 55 57 59
Subtotal 28,229 27,449 29,031 29,856 30,705
Transportation & Engineering
Personnel 762 787 809 835 858
Operating 4,872 5,019 5,169 5,324 5,484
Capital Outlay/Project 7,676 7,906 8,143 8,387 8,639
Subtotal 13,711 13,310 14,121 14,546 14,981
Parks & Recreation
Personnel 4,600 4,733 4,869 5,009 5,153
Operating 3,634 3,743 3,855 3,971 4,090
Capital Outlay/Project 108 112 115 118 122
Subtotal 8,588 8,343 8,839 9,098 9,365
Development Services
Personnel 4,126 4,242 4,360 4,482 4,607
Operating 1,302 1,341 1,381 1,422 1,465
Capital Outlay/Project - - - - -
Subtotal 5,582 5,428 5,741 5,905 6,072
General Government & Other
Personnel 5,646 5,805 5,965 6,133 6,303
Operating 3,981 4,100 4,223 4,350 4,481
Capital Outlay/Project 196 202 208 215 221
Debt Service 1,310 1,309 1,311 1,315 1,132
Subtotal 11,417 11,134 11,708 12,012 12,136
Add Back Personnel
Add Back O&M
- - - - -
Projected Savings (1,882) (1,936) (1,991) (2,048) (2,107) Total Expenditures 127,851 130,761 133,012 135,962 138,334 Expenditure Assumptions
Personnel - Wages 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 2.75%
O&M & Capital Outlay 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
Debt Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual
Assumed Expense Savings 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Fiscal Year Ending 2024 & 2025
Fiscal Year Ended
Required Revenue or
Expenditure Adjustments
City of Redding
General Fund Ten Year Plan (in thousands)
Expenditures
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: ^Ten Year Plan 23-24 & 24-25 Updated December 2023 (9.10(a)--Consider the City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial