Agenda Packet — Redding City Council, May 20, 2025 (part 2 of 3)

CITY OF REDDING

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2024-25 2025-26 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
F
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUILDING DIVISION (continued) Photo Voltaic Systems - Commercial
1 to 50 Kw 1,000.00 1,000.00 Reso. 2015-071 SB 1222
AB1132
51 to 250 Kw 1,000.00 1,000.00 Plus 7.00 per Kw or fraction there of between 51 Kw and 250 Kw
Reso. 2015-071
SB 1222
AB1132
251 Kw and up 2,400.00 1,000.00 Plus 5.00 per Kw for each Kw or fraction there of above 250 Kw
Reso. 2015-071
SB 1222
AB1132
Alternative Power Source Other Than Solar Permit (Batteries, Generator, Wind Turbine) 187.50 184.10 CPI Reso 2020-082 Electric Sign Permit 95.00 93.00 Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Misc. Circuits 31.00 30.00 CPI Reso 2024-059
Temporary Power Pole Inspection 33.00 32.00 CPI Reso. 2020-082 Energy Service Change (Residential) 159.00 156.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Energy Service Change (Commercial) 223.00 219.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Energy Permit Fee 58.00 57.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Fire Permit Fees
Fire & Life Safety Plan Check and Inspection
Commercial and Multi-Family Sprinkler Plan Check Fee
Total Value
$ 1.00 to $ 500.00 3.70 3.80 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 501.00 to $ 2,000.00 3.70 3.80 Plus $0.47 for each add'l $100 over the first $500 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 2,001.00 to $ 25,000.00 10.50 10.80
Plus $2.24 for each add'l $1000 over the first
$2,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$ 25,001.00 to $ 50,000.00 61.10 62.30
Plus $1.55 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$25,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$ 50,001.00 to $ 100,000.00 99.20 101.00
Plus $1.09 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$50,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$ 100,001.00 to $ 500,000.00 152.60 155.50
Plus $0.829618778037001 for each add'l $1,000
over the first $100,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 500,001.00 to $ 1,000,000.00 478.50 487.30
Plus $0.68 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$500,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$1,000,001.00 and up 815.40 828.50
Plus $0.54 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$1,000,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
Miscellaneous Plan Check 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Proposition 4 Buckeye Single Family Resident Site Review 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Buckeye Single Family Resident Site Visit 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 R-3 Fire Sprinkler Plan Check 126.00 124.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Commercial Sprinkler System Inspection and Test
Per Sprinkler Riser or Floor plus 124.00 145.00 Per Sprinkler Riser CPI Reso 2020-082 Per Sprinkler Head 2.60 325.00 Per Sprinkler Head CPI Reso 2020-082 R-3 Fire Sprinkler Field Inspection and Test 2.60 2.60 Per Sprinkler Head CPI Reso 2020-082 Fire Sprinkler Re-Inspection (3rd time & thereafter) 146.00 143.00 Per hour, one hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 R-1, 2, 4 Fire Sprinkler Field Inspection and Test
Per Sprinkler Riser or Floor plus 124.00 145.00 Per Sprinkler Riser CPI Reso 2020-082 Per Sprinkler Head 2.60 2.60 Per Sprinkler Head CPI Reso 2020-082 Hood and Duct Fire Suppression System Plan Review & Inspection 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Review & Inspection of Fire Service Line 143.00 453.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Review & Inspection of Fire Pump 143.00 453.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Review & Inspection of Standpipe Systems 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Fire Alarm Plan Check Fee 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Fire Alarm Field Inspection and Test plus 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Plus per devise 1.60 1.60 Per Device CPI Reso 2020-082
Fire Field Inspections 143.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 Mechanical Permit Fees
Permit Issuance 57.00 58.00 Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Supplemental Permit Issuance 9.30 9.50 Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Unit Fee Schedule
Installation of force air or gravity type furnace or burner Up to and including 100,000 Btu/h 19.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 100,000 Btu/h 35.00 36.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of floor furnace 19.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor mounted heater 19.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation, relocation or replacement of appliance vent 9.30 9.50 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Repair or alteration of, or addition of each heating appliance, 19.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system including installation of controls
Installation or relocation of boiler or compressor
Replacement of each heating appliance, refrigeration
unit, cooling unit, absorption unit or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system including
installation of controls (Residential) 156.00 220.00 Per Each CPI Reso. 2020-082 Replacement of each heating appliance, refrigeration
unit, cooling unit, absorption unit or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system including
installation of controls (Commercial) 187.00 190.00 Per Each CPI Reso. 2020-082 Up to 3 horsepower or 100,000 Btu/h 19.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Up to 15 horsepower or 500,000 Btu/h 35.00 36.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Up to 30 horsepower or 1,000,000 Btu/h 46.00 45.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Up to 50 horsepower or 1,750,000 Btu/h 66.00 67.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 50 horsepower or 1,750,000 Btu/h 115.00 113.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Air-handling unit
Up to 10,000 cubic feet per minute 13.00 13.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 10,000 cubic feet per minute 24.00 24.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Evaporative Cooler, not portable 19.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Ventilation fan connected to single duct 9.30 9.50 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Ventilation system not part of heating or a/c system 13.00 13.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation of each hood served by mechanical exhaust 13.00 13.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of domestic incinerator 24.00 24.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of commercial or industrial type incinerator 95.00 93.00
Per Each
CPI Reso 2020-082
Solar Collector 7.70 7.80 Per Collector CPI Reso 2020-082 Solar Storage Tank 7.70 7.80 Per Tank CPI Reso 2020-082

Page 6 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
Pre-application review fee 10.00% 10.00% 10% of total application fee Reso. 2006-90 Publication and Documents:

Statistical Reports 6 to 11 Based on size of document Reso. 2006-90 General Plan, Elements, etc. 6 to 17 Based on size of document Reso. 2006-90 Area / Specific Plans 6 to 28 Based on size of document Reso. 2006-90 Large Scale Copies 6 to 28 See GIS Section Reso. 2006-90 Cost for copies of documents and maps not specified above shall be established by the Development Services Director
Specific Plan Preparation Cost Recovery and Update Fee Fee = A { [M (1 + bn) ]+ [U (1+b5) ] } Where: A = Number of gross acres in the project area; M = The
City's average cost per gross acre of preparing the
Specific Plan and the MEIR and completing any
City-initiated annexation of the property. The final
amount will be set at the time of final recordation
of the City-initiated annexation. Where a privately
initiated annexation precedes a City-sponsored
annexation (if any), the fee will be determined
based on the average cost per acre, as describe
above, without the annexation costs; b = The
projected annual inflation rate. The average
annual inflation rate used for this calculation will be based on the average inflation rate for the previous
5 years as measured by the consumer price index.

The rate will be revised each year at the time of
the required annual report on the Specific Plan; n
= Number of years since the year of Specific Plan
adoption; U = Contribution towards cost of
necessary updates to the Specific Plan and
accompanying Master Environmental Impact
Report.

Reso. 2009-110
Permit Processing Fees
Parcel Maps / Property Line Adjustment:

Administrative Parcel Map - exempt from CA Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 4,752.00 4,666.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
All G.C. §66451.2
& §66451.33
Major 2- to 4- Parcel Split - NOT exempt from CEQA 8,891.00 9,054.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Property Line Adjustment 981.00 1,135.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Parcel Map Amendment or Extension 3,810.00 3,880.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Administrative Parcel Map Amendment or Extension 2,540.00 2,587.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Subdivisions:

Subdivision and Condominium Conversions: Deposit Actual Cost 5 to 25 lots 13,840.00 13,590.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 All G.C. §66451.2 26 to 50 lots 17,202.00 17,518.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 51 to 100 lots 23,384.00 23,813.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 101 or more lots 25,628.00 26,099.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Extension 3,077.00 3,134.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Amendment 6,044.00 6,155.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Reversion to Acreage 794.00 809.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Deposit Actual Cost
Annexation 5,059.00 5,152.00
Cost + 100% Overhead (does not include LAFCO
& State Fees) CPI Reso 2022-059
Abandonment: Deposit
Summary Vacation 363.00 370.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Right of Way 5,715.00 5,820.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Easement 634.00 646.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4

Page 7 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

First 4 units 5,081.00 5,174.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 5 to 49 units 12,702.00 12,935.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 50 or more units 19,052.00 19,402.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Mobile Home Park 12,702.00 12,935.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Miscellaneous 1,861.00 1,895.00 Plus $500 per additional location CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Commercial / Industrial New Construction Deposit
1 acre or less 7,621.00 7,761.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104

1.1 to 5 acres 12,702.00 14,960.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104

5.1 to 10 acres 16,511.00 19,585.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Over 10 acres 20,322.00 20,695.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Amendment - Minor 2,540.00 25% of Base Application Fee CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Amendment - Moderate n/a 50% of Base Application Fee
Amendment - Major n/a 75% of Base Application Fee
Amendment - Minor by Director 222.00 780.00 CPI Reso 2023-059 G.C. §65104 Extension 1,271.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Site Development Permit - Director 3,810.00 5,400.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Site Development Permit - Director Amendment 2,540.00 2,587.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Temporary Use Permit 1,139.00 1,160.00 Plus $250 per additional location CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Final Plan Review 2,540.00 2,587.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Short Term Rental - Vacation Rental 1,271.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Short Term Rental - Hosted Homestay 226.00 226.00 CPI Reso 2024-059 Tree Permit 65.00 64.00 Per Tree CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Administrative Sign Permits:

Temporary Promotional Advertising 487.00 496.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Temporary Banner Permit 31.00 32.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Permanent Advertising Sign 905.00 922.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Murals 50.00 50.00 CPI Reso 2024-059
General Plan Amendments / Specific Plans: All G.C. §65104 and §65456(b)
1 acre or less 12,702.00 12,935.00 CPI Reso 2022-059

1.1 to 10 acres 15,241.00 15,521.00 CPI Reso 2022-059

10.1 to 100 acres 19,052.00 19,402.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Over 100 acres 25,403.00 25,870.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
Deposit Actual
General Plan Amendment (Text) 4,199.00 4,276.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Specific Plan Amendment (Text) 4,199.00 4,276.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2023-059 G.C. §65104 Rezoning:

Planned Development Overlay District only 4,445.00 4,527.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 1 acre or less 6,987.00 7,115.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104

1.1 to 10 acres 10,796.00 10,994.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104

10.1 to 100 acres 19,052.00 19,402.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Over 100 acres 25,403.00 25,870.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Variance:

Zoning Exception 1,271.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Zoning Exception Amendment 1,525.00 1,553.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Major Variance 8,065.00 8,213.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Variance Amendment 5,142.00 5,236.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Recreational Vehicle Parking Exception 634.00 646.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Recreational Vehicle Parking Exception Renewal 318.00 324.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Development Agreement Application 8,274.00 8,426.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65865(d) Deposit Actual
Ordinance Amendment (Text) 4,276.00 4,199.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Surface Mining / Reclamation Plans 6,797.00 6,922.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.18.63.050 Annual Surface Mining Inspection Administrative Fee 1,122.00 1,143.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.18.63.050 Environmental Impact Report Processing: Deposit Deposit Actual All Pub.

Resources Code
§21089(a)

0.1 to 5 acres 6,044.00 6,155.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059

5.1 to 10 acres 7,331.00 7,466.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059

10.1 to 20 acres 9,395.00 9,568.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059

20.1 to 40 acres 15,549.00 15,835.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059

40.1 to 100 acres 20,635.00 21,014.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 For each 25 acres or fraction thereof in excess of 100 acres 2,493.00 2,448.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Environmental Assessment and Negative Declarations / De Minimis
20% of total application fee Reso. 2006-90 Pub. Resources Code §21089(a)
50% of total application fee
Deposit Deposit Actual
CEQA Mitigation Monitoring - Deposit 712.00 699.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Pre-Application Reivew / Downtown Specific Plan Area 490.00 481.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Deposit Actual
Pre-application Review Fee / Traffic or Special Study Review 20 % of total application fee
Cost + 100% Overhead Reso. 2006-90
Appeals:

Applicant 1,271.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Administrative Permit (appeal by applicant) to Bar 1,271.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Land Use History/Toxic Hazard Review/Qualified Historic Property Designation 445.00 437.00 Plus Time and Materials CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Street Renaming Request
0 - 1000 feet of street 1,596.00 1,625.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Over 1000 feet of street 1,883.00 1,918.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Floodplain Determination/Zoning Confirm Letter/ABC Public Necessity Determin. 220.00 216.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
Elevation Certificate 198.00 202.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
Certificate of Compliance Letter 1,906.00 1,941.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 LOMA / LOMR Processing
Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) 415.00 423.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) 715.00 728.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Senate Bill Fees
SB 35 n/a 1,040.00
SB 9 Pre-Application n/a 478.00
SB 9 Application Review n/a 390.00

Page 8 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT- GIS DIVISION
Maps
Color Plots

8.5 x 11 6.00 6.00 Reso. 2006-90 Proposition 4
11 X 17 12.00 12.00 Reso. 2006-90
18 x 24 37.00 36.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
24 x 36 45.00 44.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
36 x 48 and Larger 54.00 54.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Maps / GIS Data in Electronic Format 94.00 92.00 Per Megabyte (MB) $94 minimum charge CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Additional copies of Color Plots

8.5 x 11 4.00 4.00 Reso. 2006-90 Proposition 4
11 X 17 6.00 6.00 Reso. 2006-90
18 x 24 and Larger 27.00 27.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Information Technology Department - continued
Custom Mapping or GIS Analysis 107.00 111.00 Per hour CPI Reso 2020-082 Fees for documents, data reports, specialty mapping and GIS services not specified above shall be based on cost and established by the GIS Manager.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - SOLID WASTE TRANSFER / RECYCLING FACILITY Fees for Loads Without Covers: Effective July 1, 2004, the fee for a load without a cover in an open trailer or open truck or pickup bed shall be twice the posted rate for a load with a cover. The customer shall pay this fee prior to disposal.

Reso. 2008-97
Fees for Tarps in Lieu of Twice the Rate for Uncovered Loads: In lieu of paying twice the rate, the customer may purchase a tarp at the Transfer Station in a size sufficient to cover the load. The City shall refuse service to customers who do not pay the fee or purchase a tarp for a load without a cover at the Transfer Station or other City disposal sites after July 1, 2004.

The cost of the tarp shall be the Solid Waste
Utility's cost to purchase the tarp, plus a handling
charge.

Reso. 2008-97
Green Waste (no concrete/dirt/rocks/asphalt)
Per Ton Rate 32.00 34.75 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110
Pickup
Minimum (4-30 gal cans/bags, up to level pick up bed 14.00 15.00 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Bed 16.00 17.25 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Cab 17.50 19.00 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Bag or Waste Can - 33 gallon (Maximum of 3) 4.00 4.50 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Household Waste
Per Ton Rate - under 2 tons or <5 cubic yards 103.75 112.00 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 2 tons or more or > 5 cubic yards 106.00 114.50 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Pickup
Minimum (4 - 33 gal cans/bags, up to level pickup bed 28.75 31.00 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Bed 31.25 33.75 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Cab 35.00 38.00 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Bag or Waste Can - 33 gallon (maximum of 3) 4.00 4.50 Reso. 2020-017 R.M.C.9.28.110 Construction Waste
Clean wood (wood without paint or other
treatment) will be charged at same rate as selfhaul green waste. MO 2011-108 R.M.C.9.28.110 Car Tire (no wheel / rim) 2.75 2.75 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Car Tire with Rim 4.75 4.75 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Truck Tire (no wheel / rim) (46" diameter x 12" wide) 8.25 8.25 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Commercial Copier / Printer 34.50 34.50 Reso. 2016-071
Appliance with motor or compressor Market price Market price each month Reso. 2008-97 R.M.C.9.28.110 Other Large Appliance with motor Market price Market price each month Reso. 2008-97 R.M.C.9.28.110 Small Appliance without motor Market price Market price each month Reso. 2008-97 R.M.C.9.28.110 Fluid removal 6.25 CPI 6.25 Reso. 2017-054
Microwave 10.50 13.00 Reso 2023-059
Couch/Large chair/Table (hard to handle items) 8.25 CPI 8.50 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Mattress/Box Spring 8.25 CPI 8.50 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Motor Removal 6.25 CPI 6.25 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Refrigerant removal 6.25 CPI 6.25 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Mercury Switch Processing 13.00 CPI 13.25 Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Latex paint .50 / pound * .50 / pound * Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Flammable liquids, solvents .50 / pound .50 / pound Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Oil based paint, tar, adhesives, stains, petroleum .50 / pound * .50 / pound * Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Poison solids 1.75 / pound 1.75 / pound Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110

Page 9 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2024-25 2025-26 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
F
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - SOLID WASTE TRANSFER / RECYCLING FACILITY (continued) Halogenated oil 5.00 / gallon 5.00 / gallon Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Antifreeze No charge * No charge * Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Oil filters, used motor oil No charge * No charge * Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Aerosol cans 1.50 / each 1.50 / each Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.9.28.110 Propane cylinders - 16 oz only 3.00/each 3.00/each Reso 2023-059 R.M.C.9.28.110 PCB ballasts 1.25 each 1.25 each Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Non-PCB ballasts No charge * No charge * Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 HID lamps 3.50/each 3.50/each Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.9.28.110 Alkaline batteries 1.25 / pound 1.25 / pound Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Fluorescent light tubes .20/ foot .20/ foot Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.9.28.110 Compact fluorescent bulbs .50 / each .50 / each Reso. 2012-74 R.M.C.9.28.110 Hazardous Waste and Other materials not listed that may be included in diversion and recycling programs
TBD based on material
type and
recycling/disposal
processing costs
Processing/paperwork fee 25.00 / visit 25.00 / visit
Master lock Padlock for Commercial Waste Receptacles n/a 14.75 each R.M.C.9.28.110 *No charge will continue as long as the City's vendor
continues to not charge the City.

Special handling Fee
A special handling fee shall be charged by the Solid Waste Utility when market conditions result in a loss on recycling scrap metals on the following items: oven; stove; refrigerator; freezer; washer; dishwasher; water heater; dryer; window-mount HVAC unit; equivalently sized machines or equipment.

The Solid Waste Utility shall review the City's cost
to dispose of scrap metals monthly and shall adjust
the fees in order to offset the difference between
the City's cost and what it receives from the sales
of scrap metals. Fees will be based on the fee
schedule below if the City is paying to recycle
scrap metals.

Reso. 2008-97
Large Scrap Metal Loads: Large loads of scrap metals shall be charged a special handling fee as follows:
0 - 200 pounds 5.50 5.50 Reso. 2017-054
>200 - 400 pounds 8.50 8.50 Reso. 2017-054
>400 - 600 pounds 11.75 11.75 Reso. 2017-054
>600 - 800 pounds 14.75 14.75 Reso. 2017-054
Retail: The Solid Waste Utility may sell compost produced for not less than the average retail price of three local retail outlets that sell equivalent compost. Each May, the Solid Waste Utility shall conduct a survey to establish prices that are supported by the market conditions but also allows reasonable cost recovery and minimizes the volume of green waste buried at the landfill.

In accordance with CalRecycle mandates, the Solid Waste Utility may hold reduced costs sales and/or giveaways of compost and blends of green waste materials to meet diversion goals.

The City may provide a discount of up to 15% for
purchases of five (5) or more cubic yards. Reso. 2009-110 Wholesale 80% of retail price for
retail businesses
80% of retail price for retail businesses Reso. 2008-97 Screened First Grindings Same formula as for Compo Same formula as for Compost Reso. 2021-076 First Grindings Chips Same formula as for Compo Same formula as for Compost Reso. 2008-97 First Grindings Green Waste Same formula as for
Compost
Same formula as for Compost Reso. 2008-97
Delivery Costs: If the buyer of compost, mulch or wood chips does not provide transportation, the Solid Waste Utility may truck compost, mulch or wood chips at the actual cost plus 10% to any location within the City or within five (5) miles of the Solid Waste Transfer/Recycling Facility, whichever is further. The minimum load the City shall truck shall be five (5) tons or ten (10) cubic yards. If a driver or vehicle is not available, the Utility may decline to provide this service. MO 2011-108
Residential Special Collection Program: Customers who request special, curbside collections of large, bulky items that do not fit in a wheeled waste cart shall pay a fee equal to the rate for disposal at the transfer station plus additional labor and equipment costs.

If the item is not subject to a disposal fee, a handling fee equal to the Hard-to-handle fee at the transfer station shall apply.

The Solid Waste Utility shall adjust the fees for the
Residential Special Collection Program for Hard-tohandle Items on an annual basis, after adoption of the City's budget, to reflect current costs.

Maximum of six (6) items in one (1) trip.

MO 2011-108
Non-Curbside Collection Surcharge: (Wheeled Waste Carts) Rate / Month 4.50 4.50 Reso 2024-059
Replacement Fee * The City reserves the right to charge the customer for the replacement cost of a lost, stolen,
damaged, or destroyed wheeled waste cart, metal
container, or drop box(es).

MO 2011-108
Emergency/Overtime Fee * Customers requesting emergency service requiring overtime shall pay an overtime fee that shall
include the overtime rate for the employee and
equipment costs. This fee is in addition to the
regular fee for the metal container, drop-boxes, or
compactors.

MO 2011-108
Prohibited Items Fee* 42.00 43.00
Customers shall pay a prohibited items fee for
each prohibited item that is located in a cart,
container, drop-box, or compactor. This fee is in
addition to the regular fee for the metal container,
drop-boxes, or compactors. Reso 2009-106
Reso 2023-059
* All solid waste charges are subject to a 1.36% Landfill monitoring fee.

Page 10 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - AIRPORTS
Aircraft Storage Rentals - Benton Field:

Closed Hangar 1 - 20 200.00 204.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 21 - 30 218.00 222.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 31 - 40 292.00 297.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 41 - 50 363.00 370.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Open Hangar 142.00 145.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Sun Shade Hangar 142.00 145.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Storage Rentals - Regional Airport:

Closed Hangar 1 - 20 218.00 222.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 21 - 29 and 31 - 40 235.00 239.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 30 w/ Office 292.00 297.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 41 - 70 255.00 260.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 71 - 80 292.00 297.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 81 - 88 346.00 352.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 90 - 99 415.00 423.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Storage Rentals - Regional Airport: (Continued) Executive Hangar - Commercial Use Lease Lease Reso 2020-082 Executive Hangar 944.00 961.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Port-A-Port 363.00 370.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Twin Engine 549.00 559.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Jet Pod - Hangar 89 1,474.00 1,501.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Miscellaneous Fees Benton Field and Redding Regional Airport Aircraft Tie-Down (single) 51.00 52.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Tie-Down (twin & helicopter) 93.00 95.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Tie-down (Commercial Use) 142.00 139.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Tie-down (Twin - Commercial Use) 177.00 180.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2023-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Transient Tie-Down
Single 6.00 6.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Twin 7.00 7.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Small Business Jet 22.00 22.00 Per Night CPI Reso. 2006-90 R.M.C.3.04.020 Helicopter Reso. 2006-90 R.M.C.3.04.020
Light (<3,500 lbs.) 6.00 6.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Intermediate (3,500 to 7,000 lbs.) 9.00 9.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Medium (7,000 to 12,500 lbs.) 12.00 12.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Heavies (12,500 lbs >) 15.00 15.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Parking - Violation Penalty 50.00 50.00 Per Day Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Hangar Office - Single 39.00 40.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Hangar Office - Twin 68.00 69.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Electric Outlet Fee 7.00 7.00 Per Outlet Per Day Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Large Aircraft Overnight Fee greater than 2,500 sq.ft 44.00 45.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Non-Aeronautical Use of Hangars - Premium 2X Aeronautical Rental Rate Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Hangar Office - Commercial Use Lease Lease Reso 2020-082 Heating or Cooling Equipment Installation Surcharge 19.00 19.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 Delinquency Penalty - Rentals 50.00 50.00 Per Day Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Fuel Flowage Fee 0.10 0.10 Per Gallon Reso. 2006-90 R.M.C. 3.04.020 Avgas Per Gallon 0.10
Jet Fuel Per Gallon 0.10
Other aviation fuels Per Gallon 0.10
Ground Rental Rate - Benton Field & Regional Airport
Benton Field:

Non-Commercial 0.042 0.042 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Commercial 0.034 0.034 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Regional Airport:

Non-Commercial 0.042 0.042 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Commercial 0.037 0.037 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Facility Rental Rate - Redding Regional Airport
Terminal Building n/a 2.000 Per square foot per month
(when not otherwise specified in lease)
Commercial 0.037 0.037 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Landing Fees (>12,5000 lbs gross weight):

Aircraft providing regularly scheduled passenger or freight services (regardless of weight) 1.50 1.65 Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight Reso. 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.030 Landing Fees:

Non-scheduled passenger or freight aircraft over 60,000 lbs 12,500 lbs gross weight 1.75 1.90 Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight Reso. 2020-082 R.M.C. 3.04.030 Landing Fees:

Aircraft operating from Redding Regional Airport in performance of special contracts for fighting fire or otherwise with federal, state, or county governments:

1.50 1.50
Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight Reso. 2015-071 R.M.C.3.04.030
Enplaning Passenger Charge 4.50 4.50 Per Passenger Reso. 2006-90 P.L.101-508Title IX Small Package Delivery Vehicle User Fee 45.00 45.00 Per vehicle per month Reso. 2009-110 Paid Parking:
0 - 4 hours (Autos only - No Oversized Vehicles) No Charge No Charge Reso. 2015-071 Daily Parking Rate (compact, mid-size, and full size cars, light & medium trucks) 10.00 12.00 Reso. 2015-071
Daily Parking Rate for Vehicles Parked in Short-Term Parking over Four Hours 20.00 24.00 Reso. 2015-071
Weekly Rate 60.00 72.00 Reso. 2015-071

Page 11 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2024-25 2025-26 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
F
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - AIRPORTS (continued)
Oversized Vehicle - Daily Rate n/a 14.00
Per day per space occupied
Applies to any vehicle occupying multiple spaces.

Oversized Vehicle, 21 ft+ length 13.00 13.00 Reso. 2020-082 Tractor + Trailer 26.00 26.00 Reso. 2020-082
Tractor (No Trailer) 13.00 13.00 Reso. 2020-082
Trailer (No Tractor or Vehicle) 13.00 13.00 Reso. 2020-082 Power Hook Up 7.00 7.00 Reso. 2020-082
Oversized Vehicle - Weekly Rate n/a 84.00
Per week per space occupied
Applies to any vehicle occupying multiple spaces.

Oversized Vehicle, 21 ft+ length 78.00 78.00 Reso. 2020-082 Tractor + Trailer 156.00 156.00 Reso. 2020-082
Tractor (No Trailer) 78.00 78.00 Reso. 2020-082
Trailer (No Tractor or Vehicle) 78.00 78.00 Reso. 2020-082 Power Hook Up 42.00 42.00 Reso. 2020-082
Long -Term Parking (Auto only) - Special Circumstances 120.00 Monthly 30.00 Reso. 2006-90 Late Payment Processing Fee 15.00 or 3% 15.00 or 3% Whichever is greater Reso 2020-082 SIDA- Badge Fee 100.00 100.00 Per Person MO 2011-108
Title 49 Code of
Fed. Regulation
Part 1542
SIDA Renewal 20.00 35.00 Annual / Per Person / Per Year Reso. 2009-110 CHRC Vetting - Process Fee 35.00 35.00 Biennial / Per Person Reso. 2015-071 Airport Operations Area Badge Fee 20.00 25.00 Annual / Per Person / Per Year Reso. 2007-175 Lost or Damaged / SIDA or AOA Badge Replacement Fee 25.00 50.00 Per Occurrence Reso. 2009-110 Air Stairs 50.00 50.00 Per Use Reso. 2006-90
ADA Jet Aircraft Passenger Ramp 100.00 100.00 Per Use Reso. 2006-90 ADA Commuter Aircraft Passenger Ramp 50.00 50.00 Per Use Reso. 2006-90 Commercial Mobile Vendor User Fee 10.00 10.00 Per Month July 21, 2009
CC Item 9.11.(f)
Lost & Found Returns (shipping) Actual cost Actual cost Reso 2023-059 Badge Audit Non-Compliance Fee n/a 250.00 Per Occurrence Delivery Receiving/Loading/Unloading Assistance Fee n/a 150.00 Per Occurrence

HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Photocopies 0.25 0.25 Per Copy Reso. 2016-071
Copies on USB flash drive 6.50 6.50 per flash drive Reso 2023-059 Substitution and Reconveyance Fee (Auto-adjusted to Shasta County Fee Schedule) 39.50 39.50 Per Reconveyance Reso. 2016-071 Subordination Processing Fee 100.00 100.00 Reso. 2016-071

Page 12 of 12 ends

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following relative to the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Accept update regarding the Project; and
(2) Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a fourfifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact
The South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project) will be funded by the City of Redding’s Water Utility. The current total project cost is $1,380,000. The Water Utility Division’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget has sufficient funds appropriated to complete the project.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project status report and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On February 4, 2025, Council adopted an emergency resolution for the project and authorized the negotiation of emergency contracts. The project proposes to replace and relocate the failed section of 12-inch, cast-iron water main and corrugated steel pipe casing in South Street that is beneath the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks by jack and boring a new steel pipe casing and installing a 16-inch, ductile iron pipe. Work also includes water main tie-in fittings, isolation valves, asphalt concrete pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk and other miscellaneous items.

MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Update for the Emergency Work for the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 282
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2025
Re: 4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project Page 2 Staff has contracted with RTA Construction, Inc. (RTA) for the construction of the project based on their technical knowledge of utility construction and previous performance on projects of similar size and scope. Construction activities started on April 8, 2025, and are expected to be completed by June 20, 2025.

RTA has positively located UPRR’s existing underground utility along the eastern side of the railroad tracks; however, RTA was not able to positively locate UPRR’s existing underground utility along the western side of the railroad tracks. City staff are communicating with UPRR staff to coordinate additional utility location activities. Staff anticipates completion of the utility location activities including required railroad flagging by mid-May, 2025. Once utility location activities have been successfully completed, RTA will commence installation of the new steel pipe casing and proceed with installation of the ductile iron pipe and other miscellaneous associated items of work.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On February 4, 2025, the Council determined that the project is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15269(b)-Emergency Projects.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths affirmative vote, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and award an emergency public works contract for the project in an amount not to exceed $630,000;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $180,000;
(3) Approve $95,000 to cover costs for project development costs; (4) Approve $135,000 to cover costs for construction management and inspection fees; and (5) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact
The South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project) is being funded by the City of Redding’s (City) Water Utility. The Water Utility’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget has sufficient funds appropriated to complete the project. The following table provides a summary of estimated costs for the project:

Cost Summary
Item Estimated Cost
Project Development Costs $95,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $810,000
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $135,000
Total Project Costs $1,040,000
MEETING DATE: February 4, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(g)--Consider declaring an emergency for the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) Report to Redding City Council January 29, 2025
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the South Street Water Main ER Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead have staff prepare plans and specifications to award a contract to the low bidder in accordance with state and local contracting procedures. This would result in the broken water main remaining out of service through the summer of 2025 and during peak water demands which could significantly reduce reliability of the water system for City customers and fire flows in the area. Or, the Council could provide alterative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On December 9, 2024, a 12-inch, cast-iron, water main in South Street broke beneath the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks. The corrugated steel casing under the UPRR tracks that surrounds the water main also broke, resulting in erosion and voids beneath the railroad tracks.

City crews quickly made temporary repairs to close water valves and isolate the broken section of water main. They also backfilled voids in the soil caused by the break and coordinated with UPRR for repair of the railroad tracks in the area. The railroad tracks were quickly restored to normal operation, but because the pipeline break was beneath the tracks and the steel casing failed, City crews were unable to repair the water main and this segment of piping remains out of service.

Since both the water main and the casing failed beneath the railroad tracks, simply pulling a new pipe through the existing casing is not feasible. To adequately repair this main, staff intends to design for a jack and bore installation of a new steel casing and ductile iron water main, sized to convey peak flows in accordance with the City’s design standards, across the UPRR right-of-way for connection to the existing main piping on both sides.

Computer modeling of the City’s water system indicates that there should not be issues with the South Street water main remaining out of service through the winter and early spring, when water demands are relatively low. However, during the summer months and peak water demands, this main conveys significant flows eastward and its outage would have substantial impacts. If it remains out of service through the summer then peak flows would need to be conveyed through alternate routes and water mains, which will increase flow velocities, stress, and potential for surges and damage to other aging water mains in the downtown area.

If the South Street main remains out of service through the summer months, then there are several areas where increased flow velocities and potential for further pipeline damage are a concern. One, in particular, is another 12-inch water main crossing the UPRR tracks along Shasta Street, approximately one-half-mile north of the South Street water main break. The Shasta Street water main was installed in 1958 and is a cast iron pipe, similar to the South Street main that broke. The City has plans to replace the Shasta Street main with a separate capital improvement project in the near future because of concerns with its reliability. Recently, on June 19, 2024, it also had a break, just three blocks west of its railroad crossing. With the South Street water main out of service, flows through the Shasta Street main would increase to velocities above the maximum allowed by many agencies and recommended maximum in the City’s Water Master Plan. The increased flow velocities would lead to additional stress and potential for surges in the Shasta Street main that will increase the risk of additional failures.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) Report to Redding City Council January 29, 2025
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the South Street Water Main ER Project Page 3 The South Street water main provides critical redundancy for the Shasta Street main and other water mains in the area. While the South Street main remains out of service, this critical redundancy is not available. The lack of redundancy, combined with the increased velocities and stress to other aging mains where there are already concerns of reliability, including in Shasta Street, put the City at a much higher risk for additional water main failures that would have major impacts on the water system.

To provide necessary redundancy in the water system and mitigate the risks of additional pipeline breaks, disruptions in service, potential damage to infrastructure and property, and a loss of available storage and fire flow, staff recommends that the South Street Main be repaired as soon as possible and before the high water demands in the summer of 2025. Staff has considered proceeding with typical design and bid process for a capital improvement project; however, this process would likely require a minimum of seven months in order to prepare the bid package, obtain UPRR permits, advertise for bids, and award a contract for construction. At that point, the contractor would still need to order and procure materials, which would result in the construction work not starting until late 2025. This timeline is substandard and the repairs would not be completed prior to the high impact and risk period during the summer.

The broken water main presents potential impacts to public health, property and safety.

Therefore, staff proposes an emergency contract to repair and replace the broken water main in South Street beneath the UPRR crossing. If approved, staff estimates the construction will be complete in May 2025, before the high water demands in the summer and greatest risks occur.

It is noted that the Public Contract Code (PCC) (Section 20168) provides that the local government’s legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the PCC (Section 22050) provides that “in case of emergency, a public agency, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts.”
It is in the public’s interest and necessity to repair the broken water main in South Street to ensure reliability of the water system, protection of property and the public’s health and safety.

The attached Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects. Section 15269(b) includes emergency repairs to publicly and privately-owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. The emergency repair and replacement will occur in areas of previous disturbance, and the repairs are necessary to maintain service essential to public health.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) Report to Redding City Council January 29, 2025
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the South Street Water Main ER Project Page 4 Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REDDING TO DECLARE AN EMERGNCY AND AUTHORIZE THE

CITY MANAGER TO AWARD EMERGENCY CONTRACTS FOR THE

SOUTH STREET WATER MAIN AT RAILROAD EMERGENCY

REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code 4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2024, a 12-inch water main in South Street broke beneath the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks; and
WHEREAS, City crews isolated the broken segment of piping but are unable to repair it, due to its location under the UPRR tracks, and the pipe remains out of service; and WHEREAS, proper water infrastructure is critical for public health, safety, and fire protection; and
WHEREAS, if not repaired before high water demands during the summer months, there will be a lack of redundancy in the water system that will result in higher flow velocities, stress, and potential for surges in other water mains, increasing potential for additional pipeline failures; and WHEREAS, additional pipeline failures would result in disruptions in service, potential damage to associated public and adjacent private infrastructure, and a significant decrease in available water storage and fire flows; and
WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids is anticipated to require at least seven (7) months to design, advertise for bids, and award a contract for construction, after which construction would not occur until the autumn of 2025, failing to complete the necessary repairs until after the summer and highest risk period for additional pipeline damage or failures, water pressure losses, and deficient fire flows; and
WHEREAS, continued outage of the water main will significantly reduce the reliability of water systems to provide adequate pressures and fire flows, which threatens the safety of the public and properties in the downtown area; and
WHEREAS, the continued isolation and outage of the broken water main in South Street to accommodate the delay necessary for the competitive bidding process would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the water conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the water system.

3. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore declares an emergency and authorizes the City Manager to award emergency contracts to repair the broken water main in South Street at the UPRR crossing.

4. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 4th day of February, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) APPROVED Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution accepting the City of Redding’s List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2025-26 funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fiscal Impact
The estimated Fiscal Year 2025-26 Road Maintenance and Repair Account (RMRA) funding allocation to the City of Redding (City) is $2,459,594. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the attached resolution. The City would not be eligible to receive Senate Bill (SB) 1 funding in the amount of $2,459,594.

Background/Analysis
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed SB 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and road systems. SB 1 increases per-gallon fuel excise taxes; increases diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to gas tax rates in future years. RMRA funds are apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties. The City’s portion of RMRA funds for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is estimated to be $2,459,594.

SB 1 emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency in the delivery of California’s transportation programs. Therefore, in order to be eligible for RMRA funding, cities must submit a project list. The attached project list may be funded with RMRA funds depending on the availability of other funding sources within the Streets Division. The RMRA legislation MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting the List of Projects Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 292
Report to Redding City Council May 12, 2025
Re: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1 Page 2 recognizes the need for, and provides agencies with, the flexibility to fund projects in accordance with local needs and priorities. As such, the project list is simply a proposal of potential projects that may utilize these funds. Agencies are required, however, to submit expenditure reports by December 1, of each year that detail each project and corresponding amount of RMRA funds utilized to ensure program accountability.

The RMRA provides much needed funds to repair and rehabilitate existing transportation facilities at both the state and local level. The City’s backlog of deferred maintenance continues to grow as need outpaces resources.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Acceptance of the project list is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Attachment_A_Proposed_Projects_List_FY25
Packet Pg. 293
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Redding (City) are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must include a list of all projects (Attachment A) proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, in the City budget, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $2,459,594 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2025-26 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the ninth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a public process to ensure public input into our community’s project list; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop portions of the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets and roads and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and numerous similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide;
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, accepts the proposed projects which will utilize Fiscal Year 2025-26 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation revenues in their delivery. With the listing of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues List of Projects (Attachment A) funded by SB 1, the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of May, 2025, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
__________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1) Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: ^Attachment_A_Proposed_Projects_List_FY25 (4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposal (RFP) Schedule No. 5512, Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects for Future Grant Applications:
(1) Award RFP Schedule No. 5512 to Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc., (dba WTrans); (2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $237,900 with W-Trans, to update the Local Road Safety Plan and identify projects for future grants; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract amendments not-to-exceed $50,000.

Fiscal Impact
The Consulting and Professional Services Contract will be funded by federal funding obtained through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for planning and implementing Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) projects. The City of Redding (City) applied for and was awarded SS4A Program funds in the amount of $240,000 to update the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and complete the necessary outreach and preliminary engineering. The match for this grant will be provided by City staff time in-lieu of direct funds, the time will be allocated out of the City’s Streets and Road budget for existing staff time.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award this contract, in which case the grant funds secured may be forfeited. The City of Redding’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is a critical tool for improving the safety and well-being of all road users in the community. Although not a regulatory mandate, the LRSP is strongly encouraged by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Administration as a best practice for systematically identifying roadway safety issues and prioritizing effective countermeasures.

MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5512 - Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects for Future Grant Applications Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 297
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2025
Re: 4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects Page 2
Having an adopted LRSP is necessary to qualify for state and federal roadway safety funding programs, such as the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and SS4A. The updated LRSP is critical to apply for infrastructure funding in the next grant cycle. Staff intends to apply for a grant using these programs to fund the Victor/Churn Creek/Rancho intersection and corridor improvements currently in design. This contract would update the LRSP, develop multiple safety projects and aid in developing grant applications to implement these projects.

Background/Analysis
The City’s LRSP is a critical tool for improving the safety and well-being of all road users in the community. Although not a regulatory mandate, the LRSP is strongly encouraged by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Administration as a best practice for systematically identifying roadway safety issues and prioritizing effective countermeasures. Having an adopted LRSP is necessary to qualify for state and federal roadway safety funding programs, such as the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and SS4A.

The updated LRSP is critical to apply for infrastructure funding in the next grant cycle. Staff intends to apply for a grant using these programs to fund the Victor/Churn Creek/Rancho intersection and corridor improvements currently in design. This contract would update the LRSP, develop multiple safety projects, and aid in developing grant applications to implement these projects.

Many of the elements and small projects included in the current LRSP have previously been implemented or completed. The City desires to amend the current LSRP to address larger road improvement projects, incorporate more aggressive safety strategies and goals, and take a more regional approach including incorporation of projects that include state facilities. The updated LRSP will incorporate SS4A goals and, incorporate new grant ready design of projects to assist staff in applying for future infrastructure grants to construct projects that increase safety and provide access to all user groups.

Consultant Selection Process
In August 2024, a formal Request for Proposals (No. 5512), outlining the specific scope of work, was advertised in the local newspaper as well as the City’s website. Proposals were required to include a scope of work and proposed fee. The City directly solicited six firms known to engage in this type of service. On September 27, 2024, proposals and fee schedules were received and reviewed from three firms. A review and selection panel were formed consisting of members from the Public Works Department. Based upon proposal review and experience, the panel ranked the firms as follows:

FIRM RANK
W-Trans
Kittleson and Associates
1 2
GHD, Inc. 3
Packet Pg. 298
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2025
Re: 4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects Page 3
Proposals were evaluated based on the understanding of the scope of work, ability to meet the proposed schedule and maintain the project budget, experience and qualifications of the proposed staff, ability to work with City staff, project approach, familiarity with City procedures, and geographic location of the team. Applying the criteria to the proposals, the selection panel determined that W-Trans has the necessary experience and expertise to provide the required services for this project.

Following the evaluation and ranking, W-trans, proposed fees were opened and evaluated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services as well as previous similar project cost comparisons.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act. No further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Contract
Packet Pg. 299
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects) Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Award RFP No. 5512 Consultant to Update Local Road Safety Plan and Identify Projects)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Approve and ratify the City Manager’s signature accepting grant funding in the amount of $4,091,013 from CalRecycle to replace and upgrade the existing Solid Waste Utility’s Material Recovery Facility sort line; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 78th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $4,091,020 in state grant funds for the project.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding’s (City) Solid Waste Utility’s Material Recover Facility (MRF) sort line project’s total cost is estimated to be $4,500,000 and will be funded by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Beverage Container Quality Infrastructure Grant Program funding and the Solid Waste Utility fund. The CalRecycle grant will provide $4,091,013 towards the project while Solid Waste Utility will provide the balance.

Note, the Solid Waste Utility has previously budgeted $3,200,000 towards this project. Any funds budgeted, but not used, for this project by the Solid Waste Utility will return to the Solid Waste Utility Account.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may decline to accept this grant funding. By doing so, this project would need to be fully funded by the Solid Waste Utility, as CalRecycle would allocate these grant funds to another agency.

MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Accept CalRecycle Grant Funding
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 341
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2025
Re: 4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding Page 2
Background/Analysis
The current MRF sort line was originally completed in 2002. The age and condition of the current equipment contributes to sort line downtime, due to the amount of maintenance and repairs needed. When operating properly, the current sort line can process three tons of recyclable material per hour. The amount of recyclable material collected currently exceeds the sorting capacity of the equipment, ultimately resulting in the Solid Waste Utility sending 910 tons of excess recyclable material (based on a four-year average) to another facility at a cost of $95 per ton not including staff time and equipment rates to transfer the material.

The upgraded sort line is expected to be able to process 10 tons of recyclable material per hour.

This upgraded capacity will allow all of the current recyclable material to be sorted, while also providing the capacity for future expected growth in the City’s recycling material collection.

Being able to process all incoming recyclable material will both decrease our expenses by significantly reducing the need to haul material to another facility, and increase our revenue by sorting additional recycling material.

On December 3, 2024, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-102 authorizing the submission of applications for all CalRecycle grants for which the City is eligible through December 3, 2029. The Resolution also authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute in the name of the City all grant documents, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project.

On April 28, 2025, CalRecycle notified the City that the grant request was approved for $4,091,013. The Grant agreement acceptance was required to be returned to CalRecycle by May 12, 2025. Due to the short turn around time the City Manager needed to sign the grant agreement and then have the signature ratified by Council.

Environmental Review
Funding acceptance is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The future RMF sort line improvements will be reviewed for CEQA compliance and staff will return to Council for approval at contract award.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
▪ Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^QIG1 - Award RFA - signed
^City of Redding QIG1-22-0005 Grant Agreement
Reso. 2024-102 - Authorizing Submittal of Application(s) for all CalRecycle Grants Previous staff report 120324
Packet Pg. 342
Resolution No. 2025 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 78 th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $4,091,020 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM CAL RECYCLE TO REPLACE AND

UPGRADE THE EXISTING MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
251 6505

Resource Recovery $4,091,020
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
251-6505-3632001-00000 State Grant Capital - Solid Waste $ 4,091,020 Increase Expenditures
251-6505-7300004-00000 Building Improvements $ 4,091,020 Total $ 4,091,020 $ 4,091,020
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $4,091,020 in grant funding from CalRecycle for MRF Expansion project for fiscal year 2024-25.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of May, 2025 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

!"#$%&"%'$($)$*"+,$%&!-%.&*/#

01 2

3
4%*&+,+$'5$**&$-6)!%&)7*/*"4%*&+8

9
:;<=>=?

9
@
AB

CD%E)%"+4(%,*"$*%F!-$"#G*%)"%!&"!%H%*"%%/ IC4JK'5$)&-L%8M88N8OP

3Q ==<=>=?

@
11Q

R"%S!)") %(-KI*$*P%*"D%E)$*"+/!*"TUV'8J8' K%"+ &/ "$"$(4(%,*"$*%F!-$"#G*%)"%!&"!%H%*"%%/I%%/P%$)&-#% I5LP8M88N8OW

0 X
Y Z+5L8M88N8O4!E"C&"'C))/[-#4$--IC4PJK'--&"ET M'MMM'MMM",-6&#&-%/ "+,-$%*$4(%,*"$*%6&#&-$*5!*E%"+%%/'D$"+T8' MM'MMM%)%(E" &(%E/$*$)"%"$(&)")WZ+%/$*$*!*E$*$*"+/!*"TUJ' MM'MMM$) %&//*EE"D%E4(%,*"$*%F!-$"#G*%)"%!&"!%H%*"%%/W
A
:\0

X
Y
0 X@

A

1

0 X]
1 1

1

Y 2

]
1 ,-$%*$4(%
,*"$*%6&#&-$*
5!*EC&&!*"I5L
8M88N8OP
TUJ' MM'MMMTUV'8J8' KT'88J'^U_&-C))$)"*&
`H%*")

3
aY

X
X0
X
Y @
Q

Q Z+ %"/*"6)!%&)6&#&-$**E6&(%#I,-6&#&-PD) % %$"E T M'MMM'MMM%/"+,-$%*$4(%,*"$*%6&#&-$*5!*E")! %""+4(% ,*"$*%F!-$"#G*%)"%!&"!%H%*"%%/W

bcdefghijkdgllmilmngdfonkdenpndfhqrstqtttqtttnpgugnvgwvfdipjllimdxmgkdpnkdef yjgvndz{k|fkdnuf}gzhfkd}mixmghqljmpjgkddi~f|dniksicdef}jwvn| fpijm|fpiof

Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: ^QIG1 - Award RFA - signed (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

!
"

#

#

$"
#

$

%

#

&
#
$
#%#
!

!'#

#
!

(

)
*+,
*

,-- .
$

%/0#
1

/."

# 2 #

345/56
1
7#%#

$ 8

%!!
"$%
9#
:!
%:
#

(;
#
< 9"
$
2 !
#
1
7#%#
2$
0!
$
6/56/2

!!
!

#

!

(

9!!
#
2
;"$
4=/56/2
#
%
:#$
>/56

?#

$ (1
7#%#

#">@!!
#

8

A5@/66B/==@(@=(0

"2
!!
#
##
#2

!!
".
$

%/
0#
1

/."

#

C"
1

D

#

F

G

! HII222(#

#%#
(#("I$
#;
# I:

I 6 6J(0$ 8

%/6
!!
#

#"! #
/42

2

!!
#
/44!!
#

#"! #
$

2 &
/42
8

#
#!

!!
#
/
$
!!
#

%!/
$
!
K#

%!
#
/

8
&

2
(&

2
A45/555/555

!!
#
(1
7#%#
##

#

2

2!!
#
2

#

#

$
!!
#
(0
!
!
=
>@!!
#
(E

$#"
$
/

#

!!
#
(

L
$
2

!
K#

#
(

)*+M
N,
-N*,O
P
+QA /46@/=>6
R
MQE54=/
1
%CS

#8
T

7#"
%<#

%GT7<J

!
#
#%#
$

#
$ !

(T7</2#!
# "

%

/#

2

8!
/

#!#
%#
8

$
S2

##

"(ET
#56/
#
%
#

F
T#

#

%2
# ##%#

#
(
!
!

?

#

$
(
!
"

&!#

##

$%45'4 !
#
/#
1

7!
U

$%45!
#
/$

#

%
#!

#%#
$

( !
K#
&!#

#
!!
&

%A (4

!
"

%##%

#%#
!
# /$

#

%
#!

#%#
$

( !
K#
&!#

#
!!
&

%A (4

!
"
"

%##%

#%#
!
# (

)*+M
NRMVO,
P
+QAB/ @ /555
R
MQ1
%0%"

8
AB/ @ /555

2

!
45

!

#%#
!
# %
455
!

T#!
0
W

!
# %

#"

$"
#

0%"
T

U2
"#
(F

#

2

$

#"

# /

Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: ^QIG1 - Award RFA - signed (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

!
"

!" !" #

$%&

%
$

$&
$

'(

)*+,-.//0120313/*456778
9:;<4=>?@ A BAB
C<::.D1>&

&

%E

&
EF

H

GHI

$

F
J
(E

KAAL&

"
&
"

M

%

M
%

(J

M
&
"
&

FF&

M

%

E(&

M

O

%

%(M

M

P

M

%(

M

%

Q RS
(

C9T8UC0DV*30W7X
9:;<4=>?@BLALKQ
C<::.D1>$G#YM

P

Z

(

%

P
P

(

%
P

%

P

%

(

)*45[W20W;<D308;D\;D.=*;4
9:;<4=>? @AQB]
C<::.D1>H

%

%(
^

#

%

%

%

%

%

%
%

(

%(&
M

(

).D*4C.4*=.D1C0DV*30
9:;<4=>?K ABKBK
C<::.D1>&
$

$%

%

$

%

&

^

(

M

_

(

M

P

M

M

(

Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: ^QIG1 - Award RFA - signed (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

!
"#$%&$'()*++,&('%#-+.$'&-#'%/0*(%*$1%#*+2.3#4 5.*+*%461257(#%+*$81'#$*9*$%/(#%+*$)*++*$.#(%/:&$%%/#&/-&% :%#*+(8;/<*%42''*$+(0-.%(%($*:-#3:$%*$.$%:*$%*$#:3+ $'#.4.+,+:%#*+.-%&#')*%/%/$)=&*-:$%8
>?@A
!B!
CCD!
??

!
5#:$%2.4.+*$$';#$(#E%%*$6FG;7*(#*$+1%#*+2.3#4 5.*+*%461257%/%#.*3(:%#*+#:%/<*%45#:$%8;/.*+*%4*(2*(%#' <&#,(*'##:##.+*:*$<+*#$*2':-%*$H+&:%#*+(8FG;*((I*$#$% &$'*$%-&#./(&#-%*.+(#%#(%)#,%($'%/(&--#%*$=&*-:$%%&-#' %/*(1258;/(&-#'()&+'(#3-#*$.*-++4%*:-#3%/#.3#4+4%/4+$ ;#-/%/+%6J;7$'+&:*$&:,3#.$%*$#(8;/(#%#()&+'#:3$$K .:-%*,+:%#*+(#:%/-#.(()/*.//+-()*%/,%/%/4*+'$'=&+*%4,3# .$%*$#((+'8

L!M C
NO!

!
;/-#-('-#P.%,4"#$Q(%2.3#4GG<6"#$Q(%7*$3+3(%/ .#%*$E.$'#4+(%*.+$%E4(%:''*.%'%(#%*$$'-#.((*$:*0'-+(%*. ,+(6%4-(RKS7#:*%(E*$+E%#:1%#*+(2.3#45.*+*%46EE5.*+*%47$'%/# #.3#4.*+*%*(8;/*(*$*%*%*3%#%(%/#.3#4/*/K=&+*%4<+*#$*2':-%*$ H+&,3#.$%*$#(*'$%**'%/#&/,+&'*%(8G3#*$'3$.'%./$+*( #:F&+IT$'+*$E4(%:(6FTE7*$.+&'*$U2;E-4'V2WKTE-%*.+(#%#($';%+ V$%++*$.+%#:%/.*+*%4*:(%:0*:*9<+*#$*2':-%*$H+&:%#*+ #.3#4)/*+$/$.*$:%#*+=&+*%48;/R8
K.#.*+*%4=&*--')*%/(-.*+*9'
(#%*$.:-.%*$$':%#*+#:3+(4(%:(.:-+:$%(0*(%*$(*$+K(%#: -#%*$($'(&--#%(X&+*%4V$.$%*34:$%6XV7##:+(,4.++,#%*$)*%/ 2*(%#'<&#,(*'##:(8"#$Q(%)*++:$++(-.%(%/#$%K&$'' -#P.%#:=&*-:$%-&#./($'*$(%++%*$%-#%*$($(&#*$*.*$%/*/K-&#*%4 #.4.+*$-#.(((8

N

E%#.::$'(--#3+
6$*$7#$%)#'((+*(%',+)#YRSR

8

Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: ^QIG1 - Award RFA - signed (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

!"#$%&'()*+,)-.+

!/011!2&(3),)444
5'67&&!89!9&1)::
(+)-);-;
/<=
>/$29%:(+);,-),*?
51@%8%0$9
$A$ 1().+-)?;3
5$1/1 $!/$29(*)-;)*;*

!8''1(+)4-*)4*.
":BC1 $A$%%D$E1 ::
(+)4.)*.
F$1G% 892$!::
(*4)444)444

HIJKLKMNO

P

QP

>1 RS%% R1$E 11'1&!%%1 R%8T0% $<AA$2&1' R1'1%% 0 R$1)UR$S!91' 1&&!AA$2 R$1 V$'%$ R"2$ 1 1$W0& !
U1$% $09 0$F$1 $$E%&% '1BS&?XC9RA$A%'$1 @%V$'%%0SY9 V91' 1%Z
*XBR$9EE1''$1 E0% A!&&0 % 1'1'S %'0 &89!9&)$S$1
90$$1 1!0 % 1'1A!E1 %V'
&89!9&)V R134'!% R' R
V$'E&X
?XBR$9EE1''$1 @%/1 0$<0 R$ ![$VR$'& 1%0 R$\')R% $R$]%1^E0% %11'$ 0$1 RF$1 <$E1 &89!9&XBR%1'
F$1 <$E1 E0% S$92'S!
&89!9&V R134'!% R' R
V$'E&X

_______________________________________________________ 59R&&5$ 1] '
]A0 !]$9 $

`abcdeed
`fghai
jakahfeelmakidnol
`abcdeed`fghai
jfhdpqrqstrutvw
rxpyxpuwzr{|rr|
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: ^QIG1 - Award RFA - signed (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding) This document requires a digital signature to
complete your Adobe Acrobat Sign signature
process. Please open the PDF in Adobe Acrobat
or Reader version XI (11) or later.

Once you successfully sign the document in Adobe
Reader or Acrobat with a digital certificate, the
signature process will be complete.

Get Adobe Reader Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: ^City of Redding QIG1-22-0005 Grant Agreement

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION( S) FOR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF REDDING IS

ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California' s ( State) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the State thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety, and the enviromnent; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance ofthis authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management ofthe grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant' s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council RESOLVES as follows:

I To authorize the submittal of application to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Redding is eligible;

2. To authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute in the name of the City of Redding all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and

3. To adopt these authorizations as effective for five ( 5) years from the date of adoption of this Resolution, until December 3, 2029.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3` d
day of December, 2024, and was duly adopted
at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - Johnson, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - None
enessa Audette, Mayor
0 WHIII 01 MMKlP1xx4y"] TI
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Reso. 2024-102 - Authorizing Submittal of Application(s) for all CalRecycle Grants (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: December 3, 2024 FROM: Michael Webb, Public Works ITEIVI NO. 4. 11( e) Director
APPROVED BY***
c a bEi ' c r Cs I7 reetcsr 1 tf 12t}`? r5' p
i, C i r , f j,
mwebb@cityofredding. org btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4. 11( e) Adopt Resolution Authorizing Submission of Applications for all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery ( CalRecycle) Grants for Five Years
Recommendation
Approve and adopt the following:
1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the submission of all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery grant application( s) for which the City of Redding is eligible for a five- year period from December 3, 2024 through December 3, 2029. This authorization includes applying for the Beverage Container Quality Infrastructure Grant program in the amount of $4, 091, 013 to upgrade and replace various sorting equipment in the City of Redding' s Material Recovery Facility on Abernathy Lane; and 2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all grant documents necessary to complete the application process.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact in approving the resolution. If the City of Redding ( City) submits a successful application for the Beverage Container Quality Infrastructure Grant ( BCQIG) Program it would receive a $ 4, 091, 013 allocation from California Department of Resources Recyeling and Recovery ( CalRecycle) with no required matching funds. This resolution allows the submission of subsequent grant applications through December 3, 2029.

Alternative Action
The City Council ( Council) could decline to authorize the resolution for grants to CalRecycle which would result in the City not applying or receiving any funding through the BCQIG Program. Further, a grant specific Council resolution would be required for each CalRecycle grant opportunity going forward.

Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Previous staff report 120324 (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding) Report to Redding City Council November 26, 2024
Re: 4. 12( e) Authorize CalRecycle Resolution Page 2
Background/Analysis
Each year, CalRecycle presents several opportunities to apply for grants. CalRecycle has developed a process for jurisdictions to streamline the submittals of grant applications whereby the governing body of the jurisdiction may pass a multi-year grant application resolution. The City previously adopted a multi- year Resolution, No. 2016- 107, on December 14, 2016, and No. 2022- 001, on January 18, 2022. The prior resolution expires during the grant term of the BCQIG Program, requiring a new resolution to be approved in order to complete the application process.

Pursuant to the City' s Grant Administration Policy Directives and Procedures Manual ( Grant Administration Policy), all grant applications over $ 50, 000 require Council approval. If the grant is awarded and the sum is over $ 25, 000, staff wi11 obtain Council approval. All CalRecycle grant applications and awards will comply with the City' s Grant Administration Policy. During the proposed five- year grant resolution term, a new resolution for applications will not be necessary.

The Public Works Department plans to submit and apply for funding through the CalRecycle BCQIG Program. This is a competitive grant program that will provide one-time funding to assist with infrastructure costs in improving the quality of material sorting to create cleaner streams of recycled beverage containers substantially free from contaminates.

The City is requesting funding to support replacing and upgrading equipment on the material recovery sorting line, including adding robotic arms and AI software to help sort material.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council P io ity/City Manager Goals
Budget and Financial Management—" Achieve balanced and stable 10- year Financial Plans for all funds."
Government of the 21st Century—` Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today' s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today."
Attachments
Resolution
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Previous staff report 120324 (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding) RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION( S) FOR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF REDDING IS

ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery( CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs ( grants) in furtherance of the State of California' s ( State) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the State thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety, and the environment; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance ofthis authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant' s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council RESOLVES as follows:

1. To authorize the submittal of application to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Redding is eligible;

3. To adopt these authorizations as effective for five ( 5) years from the da e of adoption of this Resolution, until December 3, 2029.

I I-IEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the
3rd day of December, 2024, and was duly adopted
at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Previous staff report 120324 (4.11(d) Accept CalRecycle grant Funding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) - Schedule No. 5518, Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Old Oregon Trail Shoulder Widening Project (Project):
(1) Award RFP to TRC Companies;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $346,440.93 with TRC Companies to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Old Oregon Trail Shoulder Widening Project; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract amendments not-to-exceed $50,000.

Fiscal Impact
Funding for the Old Oregon Trail Shoulder Widening Project is by a combination of 51 percent Federal Safety Program funds (HSIP) and 49 percent City of Redding’s (City) Street Department funds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award this contract, in which case, staff would be required to manage construction management and inspection. This would require either consultant services to be solicited for other capital work or a reduction in the City’s Capital Program delivery.

MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposals (Schedule No. 5518) Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Old Oregon Trail Shoulder Widening Project.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 354
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening Page 2 Background/Analysis
The project is approximately 1.1 miles in length and includes adding 6-foot paved shoulders/bike lanes from Paso Robles Avenue to Bear Mountain Road. Portions of the project will include full reconstruction, new construction, partial reconstruction, cold milling and paving. Construction activities are anticipated to commence in mid-May, and given the current volume of capital projects currently and anticipated to be active this construction season, consultant services for contract administration of this project are needed.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
In August 2024, a formal Request for Proposals (No. 5518), outlining the specific scope of work, was advertised. Proposals were required to include a scope of work and proposed fee. Proposals and fee schedules were received on September 20, 2024, from two firms. A review and selection panel were formed with members from the Public Works Department. Based upon proposal review and experience, the panel ranked the firms as follows:

FIRM RANK
TRC Companies
Ghirardelli Associates
1 2
Proposals were evaluated based on their understanding of the scope of work, ability to meet the proposed schedule and maintain the project budget, experience and qualifications of the proposed staff, ability to work with City staff, project approach, familiarity with state and City of Redding procedures, and geographic location of the team. Applying the criteria to the proposals, the selection panel determined that TRC Companies was the best qualified firm to provide the required services for this project.

Following the evaluation and ranking, TRC Companies proposed fees were opened, evaluated, and negotiated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services as well as previous similar projects cost comparisons.

The consultant fee is estimated and the contract will be for actual work performed. However, staff recommends the approval of an additional $50,000 in contingency reserve. Contingency funds may be necessary due to unforeseen project issues. If this reserve needs to be utilized, a contract amendment would be negotiated with the consultant and the contract would be modified with approval of the City Manager. A professional services agreement with TRC Companies has been approved as to form by the City Attorney’s office and is attached.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On February 15, 2022, the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project thereby satisfying the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines §15074. No further action is required.

Packet Pg. 355
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening Page 3 On January 21, 2022, Caltrans determined that the project is categorically excluded from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, pursuant to 23 CFR 771.117(c): activity (c)(26) – Modernization of a Highway.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^NEPA CE
Contract
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 356

ALICIA PKWY

PASO ROBLES AVE

GLIDE WAY

SUNBEAM CIR

PEAR LN

YANOT DR

MOODY CREEK DR

VERNITA DR MITCHELLINDA DR

PALA MESA CIR

MIDLAND DR

COVEY RD

PALERMO CT

RAINTREE LN

SAN VINCENTE DR

LA CRESCENTA DR

RHONDA LN

BELLETERRE DR

FIVE G'S LN

MELONBANK DR
HIDEAWAY DR BOX 3 RANCH RD

LOWRY LN

ESCADA CT

AUTUMN OAKS LN

MORNING DOVE LN

CANPOM CT

OASIS BLVD

FRONTIER RD

AKRICH ST

OLD OREGON TRL PASO ROBLES AVE
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

LOCATION MAP GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet
DECEMBER 15, 2021 OLD OREGON TRAIL SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

CITY OF REDDING

CITY LIMIT
P:\Environmental Management\ProProjects\OldOregonTrailSafetyProject.aprx Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: ^NEPA CE (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: ^NEPA CE (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: ^NEPA CE (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: ^NEPA CE (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 382
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project:
(1) Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program; (2) Approve Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project as described, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines §15074); and
(3) Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Shasta County Clerk’s Office and the State Clearinghouse.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the project along with adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) allows the project to move forward to the final design and construction phases. There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of adopting the MND, MMP, and approving the project.

The Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project is estimated to cost $3,200,000. The project is grant funded through the Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) (90 percent) and the Streets Division (10 percent).

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not adopt the MND and the MMP, and not approve the project as described. Without approval, the project would not proceed as a City of Redding (City) project, as it would not be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Adoption of the Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project, Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation and Monitoring Program Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 4.11(e)--Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project Page 2 Background/Analysis
The project area lies in northeast Redding along Old Oregon Trail. Construction will begin approximately 100-feet west of Paso Robles Avenue and extend east to Bear Mountain Road.

The purpose of the project is to improve safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. The project is needed as this section of roadway has little to no roadway shoulder, and non-motorized access is limited. This section of roadway also has an accident rate that is higher than the statewide average for similar roadways. The project includes earthwork, vegetation removal, drainage modification, utility relocation, fencing and guardrail installation, paving, striping, sign installation, and right of way (ROW) acquisition.

The existing road alignment would be widened to create one standard 12-foot wide lane in each direction with 6-foot wide paved shoulders. A section of roadway would also be realigned to improve a compound curve. Tree removal would be necessary to allow for road widening, and existing culverts beneath the road would be replaced, extended, or abandoned in place as needed.

Utility poles, fire hydrants, and waterlines would be relocated if they conflict with the new roadway improvements. New guardrail would be installed where needed for public safety. Most work would occur within the existing ROW, but some permanent ROW would be needed from adjacent private lands to realign the roadway and improve the curve. A temporary construction easement (TCE) may be needed in one location to allow for culvert extension. Contractor staging areas would be located in existing graveled pullouts along the Old Oregon Trail existing ROW:
one is approximately 0.2 mile south of the southern end of the project’s construction area boundary, and one is approximately 0.1 mile north of the northern-most end of the project area.

Construction would require one-way traffic control, resulting in travel delays of up to 20 minutes. Some portions of the work may require partial roadway closures and traffic detours. It is anticipated that construction would take one season and is planned for 2023.

An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It describes why the project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed project could have a significant effect on biological resources, but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The mitigation measures and conservation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre-construction surveys, impact minimization, and erosion control.

Based on the conclusions made in the IS, an MND was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project. In addition, a Mitigation and Monitoring Program has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.

The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30-day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. One comment letter was received during the public comment period. A response to the comment letter has been prepared and is attached to the final MND.

Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening) Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 4.11(e)--Old Oregon Trail Safety Improvement Project Page 3 The City of Redding is the lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the City Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section §18.24.070.E and state law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the City Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk’s Office and the State Clearinghouse, completing the environmental review process. The IS/MND is available in the City Clerk’s office for review and is currently available online at https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/environmental-management.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Location Map
Mitigated Negative Declaration (available online)
Response to Public Comments (available online)
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award RFP No. 5518 CM Services OOT Shoulder Widening)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) The City Manager, or designee, to sign a letter giving notice to the NorCal Continuum of Care that the City of Redding will no longer serve as the interim Administrative Entity effective December 31, 2025;
(2) Find that applying for and administering grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(3) Find that applying for and administering grant funding is an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act under 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding (City) is contracted to provide administrative services for the NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Since the CoC compensates the City to provide these services with grant funding, there is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Should the City no longer continue to serve as the Administrative Entity (AE) for the CoC, all grant funds associated with this function will be transferred to the successor AE.

City staff funded by the CoC grant will be absorbed into other Housing Division programs.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to notify the CoC of the City’s intention to no longer serve as the AE. In this case, either the City would seek to continue as the AE or the requirement of a minimum 90-day notice will not be met as required by the MOU and Council would need to provide direction to staff regarding the next course of action.

MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.2(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(c)--Consider NorCal Continuum of Care Administrative entity resignation.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 398
Report to Redding City Council May 15, 2025
Re: 9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation Page 2 Background/Analysis
In June 2023, the CoC unexpectedly was provided a letter of resignation from Shasta County serving as the AE. This left the CoC essentially unable to complete the annual submission of the Collaborative Application to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). On August 15, 2023, Council approved City staff to assist the CoC with this endeavor.

On August 28, 2023, the NorCal CoC Executive Board (Executive Board) discussed the possibility of the City acting as an interim AE. At the close of the discussion, the Executive Board Chair requested that the City provide its estimated cost for this function, based on the duties outlined in its Governance Charter. At the meeting of September 11, 2023, the City provided this information along with stipulations to being the interim AE. The Executive Board voted and approved the City as the AE.

On September 19, 2023, Council approved the City to act, on an interim two-year basis, as the AE for the CoC. On February 29, 2024, a retroactive MOU between the City and the CoC was executed, laying the foundation for each party’s duties and responsibilities for the term of performance (September 19, 2023, through September 19, 2025).

Recently, the Executive Board and the AE discussed the CoC’s structure, revenue, and costs of administering the CoC, including both Homeless Management Information System administration and various other consultant costs. At the conclusion of these discussions, it became apparent that the cost for the City to perform AE duties was significant and not sustainable for the NorCal CoC. Given the high cost of operation, uncertain revenue streams and the inevitable end to the interim MOU, the City requested that the Executive Board approve a Request for Proposal (RFP) be published to determine if any entities wished to provide the AE duties to the CoC.

On March 20, 2025, the Executive Board reviewed and approved the RFP for publication. The RFP was published on March 24, 2025, with a deadline for submissions of May 1, 2025, with a one-week extension to May 8, 2025. There were no bidders, and the RFP was deemed unresponsive and closed.

The Executive Board has requested the current AE publish a new RFP on May 19, 2025. This RFP makes clear to bidders, that responses to the RFP may include bids for territories smaller than the current seven county CoC. For example, a bidder may wish to submit a response to the RFP for any number of counties under the seven, meaning a bidder could submit a response to the RFP for a single county, for two counties or more, depending on its capacity. This means that the NorCal CoC as it exists today, may be reduced in size and split into several smaller continuums which may provide better local coordination and control as well as less burdensome grant application processing and monitoring with the State of California.

In the meantime and pursuant to the MOU, staff recommends issuing a letter giving notice to the CoC that the City will no longer serve as the interim AE effective December 31, 2025 or sooner should another AE be selected.

Environmental Review
Applying for and administering grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Packet Pg. 399
Report to Redding City Council May 15, 2025
Re: 9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation Page 3 Applying for and administering grant funding is considered an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act, 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development - “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^COR Administrative Entity Resignation Letter
COR CoC Administrative Entity Staff Report - 09/19/2023 COR and NorCal CoC MOU
Packet Pg. 400
[DATE]
Executive Board
NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC)
Dear NorCal CoC Executive Board Members,
On behalf of the City of Redding, this letter is intended to formally inform you of our decision to step down as the Administrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) effective no later than December 31, 2025.

After much consideration and reflection on our current capacity and the evolving needs of the CoC, we have concluded that it is in the best interest of both the City of Redding and the CoC to transition this important responsibility to another entity. This decision was not made lightly, as we deeply value the work and partnerships we have fostered through our role as the Administrative Entity, as well as our commitment to addressing homelessness and supporting vulnerable populations in our community and the broader region.

We are committed to ensuring a smooth transition during this period and will work closely with the NorCal CoC Board and other stakeholders to facilitate the handoff of responsibilities. We are prepared to assist in the search for a new Administrative Entity and will provide necessary guidance or support to ensure continuity in services and operations as we approach the transition date.

Please know that the City of Redding remains dedicated to the ongoing work of the CoC and we will continue to support efforts to reduce homelessness in our community and across the region.

We look forward to working with you to identify the next steps and ensure a seamless transition for all involved.

Thank you for your understanding and collaboration. Should you have any questions or require further clarification, please feel free to reach out to Shawnna Flanigan directly at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Barry Tippin
City Manager
City of Redding
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: ^COR Administrative Entity Resignation Letter (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation)

!"#$%&$'' (#

#)**+!%,-
./0

!"#

#1!
2)3#&&!%,
4# (#$4

#!%
# !5&5!%!4
$
!(#6%
!
2)

#
7 1$*1%
!%

5)1$ #) $
+82#$
# 59
.:0

!"#

#1!
2;$%$,#
%#,
!$
#$%&4!,%$;#5 $%&
5)<%&# 4
$%&!%,+!

=>?@ABCDECAF=GFHHIAJCDB?KLMN?OH=GP?QADBRAH=EGFGFS=>?B?LT?O=GP?BAE?LDFR B?LTAFLGUGEG=G?LAJ=>?CG=VAJW?RRGFSDL=>?@ABCDECAF=GFHHIAJCDB?KLXRIGFGL=BD=GP? 6%
!
29 .Y0

!"#

#1!
2;$%$,#
4 Z5!
$''*![$
!%4 &[
5#%
4%#[#44$ 2
$''*2

#\
$
#)1$*!) %!$)

#]5#*#44]
4!%,44!4
$%[#$%&^ #(#%
!%, $%
_

# , $%
4 $
Z#[5#$($!*$Z*#%Z#
$*))

#7 1$*1%
!%

5)1$ #_$%&
$'' ' !$
#)
%&4 #[#!(#&9
.`0a!%&

$
$[
!%,!%$%$&5!%!4
$
!(#[$'$[!
2!4%
[%4!&# #&$' b#[

%&#

#
1$*!) %!$6%(! %5#%
$*c
$*!
2[
9$%&
.d0a!%&

$
$[
!%,!%$%$&5!%!4
$
!(#[$'$[!
2!4$%#e#5'
$[
!(!
2 %&#

#7$
!%$*
6%(! %5#%
$*^*![2[
f

ghijk
\
$))#4
!5$
#4

$
4# (!%,$4

#&5!%!4
$
!(#6%
!
2)

#7 1$*1%
!%

5)1$ #
.7 1$*110+!** #l
! #

#
! !%,)%#)
**
!5#_44[!$
#^ b#[
1 &!%$
fm
#
#4
!5$
#&

$*[4
)

!4'4!
!%_!%[*
&!%,$/n'# [#%
!%&! #[
[4
$
#) $&5!%!4
$
!(#
$%&'# $
!%$*[4
4+!**Z#o:p`_qr:'# 2#$ f

#\#'
#5Z# //_:n:Y_

#7 1$*6e#[

!(#s$ &.6e#[

!(#s$ &0$'' (#&4
$))KL
Z
&,#
#l
#4
#&

$
!%[*
&#&

#[4

Z#)
**2)
%&#&Z2, $%
4$%&[%
!Z

!%4 #[#!(#&

#7 1$*11ft
!4$%
![!'$
#&

#'4!
!%+!**Z#)
%&#&Z2]5#*#44$%&
]
4!%,44!4
$%[#^ , $5)
%&4_!%&!(!&
$*1
%
2[%
!Z

!%4$%&5!4[#**$%#
4 $&5!%!4
$
!(#)##4 #[#!(#&

# , $%
)
%&4fm
# #+!**Z#%!5'$[

#u#%# $*
a
%& #e!4
!%,]
4!%,v!(!4!% #4
[#4f
w

x y\#'
#5Z# /r_:n:Y
w
zrf:.[0
wy

{{{x

|
}{{{

~

z

z
} yrf:.[0881%4!&# $

!"!%,

#1!
2)3#&&!%,
4# (#$4

#7 1$*
1%
!%

5)1$ #4&5!%!4
$
!(#6%
!
2f
\
#(#s$&#_44!4
$%
1!
2 ;$%$,#
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: COR CoC Administrative Entity Staff Report - 09/19/2023 (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation)

! "!

#

$$%!&
$

#
$'%

%$ ()

*$

+,-./01-23.+4-250
6789:;<9=>?@:AB9=>?@:AC@=>AD@7==E8?=;;=E8FG8HE;78IDJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<LM=N8G8FOHE ?==;78F=FPH?:QH;:=?7HE8A8@;8D;=R:AA;7:EF=A8O;7:E=S;:=?JH<F8E>A;:?T8=SHFD:Q:?PR>?D:?P R=F7=J8A8EEE8FG:@8EN:;7:?;78U=F9HA9=9F8P:=?L V14WX/5Y0Z[+01,\]2]

^?I>P>E;_`OabacO9=>?@:AH>;7=F:Q8D;789:;<=Rd8DD:?PB9:;<C;=E8FG8HE;789=AAHe=FH;:G8 ISSA:@H?;R=F;78f:E@HAg8HFabac9=?;:?>>J=R9HF8ISSA:@H;:=?=?e87HAR=R;78U=F9HA9=9 H?DFH;:R:8D;78HNHFD=RM=J8A8EEM=>E:?POIEE:E;H?@8H?DhF8G8?;:=?d=>?DcR>?D:?P;=;78 9:;<:?;78HJ=>?;=Ri`jOklaLcbR=FHDJ:?:E;FH;:G8@=E;EHEE=@:H;8DN:;7;789:;<R>?@;:=?:?PHE ;789=AAHe=FH;:G8ISSA:@H?;LI;;7:EJ88;:?PO;789:;<mH?HP8FHDG:E8D;789=>?@:A;7H;HE=R nopoqrstusvswuxyzqrz{|o}r~r}zrrq|zqry |z{|{qn}qrzr}rr~
H?D;7H;E;HRRN=>ADA:8A<e8F8;>F?:?P;=9=>?@:AN:;7HF8>8E;R=F;789:;<;=E8FG8HE;78

|{z{|{qnJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<L

^?I>P>E;ajOabacO;78K8@>;:G8=HFDJ8;;=D:E@>EE;78?88DR=FH?:?;8F:JIDJ:?:E;FH;:G8 K?;:;<;=E>SS=F;;78R>?@;:=?E=R;78U=F9HA9=9LIESHF;=R:;E=G8F?H?@897HF;8FO;78U=F9HA 9=9D8;H:A8D;78HDJ:?:E;FH;:G8D>;:8E?88D8D;=e8SF=G:D8De<;78:?;8F:JIDJ:?:E;FH;:G8 K?;:;<L678=HFD97H:FSF8E8?;8DHDD:;:=?HA:?R=FJH;:=?H?DF8>8E;8D;7H;;78K8@>;:G8=HFD @=?E:D8F;789:;<HAE=E8FG8HE;78IDJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<LI;;78@A=E8=R;78D:E@>EE:=?O;78 K8@>;:G8=HFDF8>8E;8D;7H;;789:;<D8;8FJ:?8;78@=E;OeHE8D=?;78D>;:8EE;:S>AH;8DN:;7:? :;E=G8F?H?@897HF;8FL

;HRR@=JS:A8D;78F8>8E;8D:?R=FJH;:=?H?DSF8E8?;8D:;ER:?D:?PEH;;78K8@>;:G8=HFD J88;:?P=?8S;8Je8F__OabacL?HDD:;:=?;=;78HPF88D>S=?E8FG:@8EOE;HRRHAE=F8>8E;8D;= e8@=JS8?EH;8DR=F=;78FD>;:8E}|rqr}ryor|zq|}z}{yzrLI ESF8HDE788;D8;H:A:?P;78=G8FHAAD>;:8E=R;78IDJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<N:;7HEE=@:H;8D7=>FE:E H;;H@78D;=;7:EE;HRRF8S=F;L8<=?D;78E8D>;:8EO;789:;<HAE=F8>8E;8D;7H;HAAPFH?;EHEE=@:H;8D N:;7;78U=F9HA9=9e8HDJ:?:E;8F8De<;789:;<H?D;7H;Hh=:?;:?6:J8@=>?;?=;e8 @=?D>@;8D:?H?>HF<abaHE:;:EH?=?JH?DH;=F<<8HFH?D?=;F8>:F8De<;78LL 8SHF;J8?;=RM=>E:?PH?DFeH?8SHF;J8?;L678K8@>;:G8=HFDG=;8DH?DHSSF=G8D;78 9:;<;=H@;HE;78?;8F:JIDJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<L

7=>AD9:;<9=>?@:AHSSF=G8;789:;<;=H@;HE;78IDJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<R=F;78U=F9HA9=9O;78 9:;<N:AA8?;8F:?;=Hm8J=FH?D>J=R?D8FE;H?D:?PBm^CN:;7;78K8@>;:G8=HFDL678 m^H?DH?<E>eE8>8?;@=?;FH@;E:?G=AG:?P;789:;<HE;78IDJ:?:E;FH;:G8K?;:;<N:AAe8 F8G:8N8D~ry{r~nrr|}~q|r|}qoryzr|qrpzr|}z}}}zr|} :ESF=G:D8DN:;7:?8H@7E>eE8>8?;@=?;FH@;L

032/50.0-1,.32.

hF=G:D:?PHDJ:?:E;FH;:G8D>;:8E:E?=;@=?E:D8F8DHSF=T8@;>?D8F;789HA:R=F?:HK?G:F=?J8?;HA ¡>HA:;<I@;B9K¡ICLI?<R>;>F8SF=T8@;;7H;:ED8G8A=S8DN:AAe8F8G:8N8DR=F9K¡I @=JSA:H?@8=?@8;78D8;H:AEHF8?=N?L

?D8F;78UH;:=?HAK?G:F=?J8?;HAh=A:@<I@;BUKhICOHDJ:?:E;FH;:G8H?DJH?HP8J8?; H@;:G:;:8EHF8@=?E:D8F8D88JS;H@;:G:;:8EH?D?=R>F;78FH@;:=?:EF8>:F8D>?D8Fa9fd Packet Pg. 403 ¢£¤¥¦§¢¨©ª«¬Attachment: COR CoC Administrative Entity Staff Report - 09/19/2023 (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation)

! "!

#

$$%!&
$

#
$'%

%$ ()

*$

+,-./0120.2-34567879:;9<=:>8?@ABBC:9:DA:@:E6<9FGH39:I7A9:J:48?A61@19E:E674EA4K-
LMNOPQRSTQMTQUVWLQUVXYOYZ[T\MYR]

^_`abcdebdf`gfhbijkflbdfmcnopqrsrtruvwxvwyzs{v|x}urx{x~r{zz{sxw}x}rvwy |~vttrwr{x{yvsr}yrwxvwy
{s{s|rwx}|}zvxrx~rxsrx{vrrxxrs
yr|}}{wx{yv
^`d`ebab`ebdfpv|}t}xvxrvwyr|{rv|vxvtx{sr|{w{}|yrurt{zrwx}w :EEA4K8<>9:18:=<C?9:81A4>799:48C7?A4:??:?14E18891>84:@<4:?14E:4><791K: }wurxrwx}wx~r|{w}x

UUYP[OU]
916878A:?14E<9:>1?8:E<79?oF<91B<3EJA4G48A85 Packet Pg. 404 ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨Attachment: COR CoC Administrative Entity Staff Report - 09/19/2023 (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 405
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 406
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 407
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 408
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 409
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 410
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation) Packet Pg. 411
Attachment: COR and NorCal CoC MOU (9.2(c)--NorCal CoC Administrative Entity Resignation)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept presentation regarding Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Project updates and Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts; and provide staff with feedback and direction for development of the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund by accepting this report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts and provide other direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On January 16, 2024, the Council accepted the Vision and Guiding Principles Framework for the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan. The vision was developed based on extensive feedback, discussion, and refinement by the general public and the Community Coalition. That document is a foundational piece for the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan process and represents the overarching aspirational framework for how the community would like to see the area change, improve, and be enhanced in the future.

City staff and the project team held a series of community workshops, stakeholder discussions, and an online survey in the summer/fall of 2024 to solicit additional community feedback on potential alternatives and options for the riverfront planning area. This included alternatives and options related to: natural and cultural spaces; outdoor activities; buildings and uses; and mobility. The Community Discussion #2 Summary includes a combined summary of community and stakeholder feedback and comments received during the various engagement activities held in the summer/fall of 2024.

MEETING DATE: May 20, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.4(a)--Consider the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Emerging Concepts by the City of Redding.

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 412
Report to Redding City Council May 15, 2025
Re: 9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Emerging Concepts by the City of Redding Page 2 Following that engagement, staff and the project team developed an Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts Summary. The summary includes information on the emerging Vision Framework Diagram (proposed land uses, activities, and circulation within the plan area), Northern Riverfront Concepts, Southern Riverfront Concepts, and a summary comparison for how the various concepts relate back to the community’s Vision and Guiding Principles Framework reviewed by Council during the prior phase of the project.

On May 5, 2025, the Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts were presented to the community during a community Open House. These materials are also available on the project website (www.ReddingRiverfront.org). The Community Open House Engagement Summary includes community feedback received thus far on the emerging concepts.

If Council accepts the Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts Summary, staff will proceed with next steps in the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan update process, which includes developing draft specific plan language and initiating the environmental review process.

Environmental Review
Reviewing and accepting of the emerging concepts for the Redding riverfront is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024)
Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024)
Community Open House Engagement Summary (May 2025)
Packet Pg. 413

EMERGING REDDING RIVERFRONT CONCEPTS
Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Community Open House | May 5, 2025 Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding The Redding Riverfront
2 Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

PROJECT UPDATES
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Project Purpose
In April 2023, the Redding City
Council began a communityled process to update the
Redding Riverfront Specific
Plan.

The purpose of this process is
to reintroduce the city and
community to the river by
creating a long-term vision for
380 acres of public and private
land and water along the
Sacramento River.
4 Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Study Area
The study area
includes a range of
public and private
property along the
Sacramento River.

It is generally bounded
by the Redding
Memorial Park/Park
Marina Drive on the
west, the Sacramento
River on the north and
east, and Cypress
Avenue on the south.

Major Road
Canal
River Channel and Water Bodies
Boat Ramps
Parcel
Sundial Bridge
Study Area Boundary

STUDY AREA
Trails
Parks
Destinations
Schools
5 Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring
2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4
Community
Discussions and
Events
Community
Coalition
Major Reports
and Analysis
2 0 2 5
City
Commission and
Council Review
Community Coalition Meetings
Community Discussions:

Opportunities and
Alternatives
Draft Riverfront
Specific Plan
and EIR
Final Riverfront
Specific Plan
and EIR
Summer
City Council
Meeting
City Council
Public Hearings
Phase 1: Kick-Off
and Visioning
Phase 2: Analysis
and Opportunities
Phase 4: Specific Plan
and EIR Development
Phase 3: Plan
Concepts Development
Commission and City
Council Meetings City Council
Meeting
Existing
Conditions
Alternatives
Analysis
Commission and
City Council Meetings
Vision and Guiding
Principles Framework
Fall
Project Schedule
Community Discussions:

Visioning
Community Discussions:

Emerging Riverfront
Concepts
Community
Discussions: Draft
Plan and EIR
Current Stage
6 Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Community Open Houses | August 2023
Add
7 Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Community Coalition Meetings | October through December 2023 8 Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Key Discussion Themes
• Recognizing past wrongs.
• Importance of public access, so there is no fear of
trespassing or being blocked by private land.
• Visibility of the region as homeland.
• Use of language in local signage.
• Privacy during ceremonies.
• Possible areas of no disturbance for sacred sites
(especially possible burial sites).
• Co-stewardship: trimming back vegetation,
helping salmon to stabilize population, etc.
• Co-management: greater control in guiding
future use.
• “Land Back” can mean a variety of things and
can be accomplished through a variety of
methods with access, co-stewardship and
allowable cultural practices.

Attendees
Number of attendees: Approximately 50
The majority were Wintu
(Including people from all present day Wintu groups – Wintu, Pit River, Winnemem Wintu, Chickasaw, Colusa, Paiute,
Ohlone, Shasta, Hawaiian, Purepecha, Hupa, and non-native) MIG: Christine Scott Thompson, Jose Leal and Daniel Iacofano Tawaw: Aleks Webster
Tribal Liaison: Kenwani Kravitz
City staff: Jeremy Pagan and Travis Menne
Indigenous Listening Session | January 2024 9
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Community Discussions: Opportunities and Alternatives | June 2024 10 Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Advance Redding
Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District
Asphalt Cowboys
Audubon Community
Chamber of Commerce
Fishing Community
Flyshop
McConnell Foundation
Northern Riverfront Tenants
North Valley Catholic Social Services (NVCSS)
Redding Rancheria
Redding Rodeo Association
Riverside Eyecare
Shasta Environmental Alliance
Southern Riverfront Property Owners
Southern Riverfront Residents
Turtle Bay
VIVA Downtown
Wintu Members and Tribe
Discussions with Community Interest Groups | Ongoing 11 Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Redding
Riverfront
Vision
Elements
A
A Healthy
and Resilient
Natural
Environment B
Respecting the
Indigenous
Community:

Past, Present,
and Future
C
Environmentally
Sensitive and
Economically
Viable Arts,
Cultural, and
Entertainment
Venues
D
Appropriate
Scale and
Uses
E
World-Class
Recreation and
Activities
F
Connected
Spaces
G
Memorable
and Vibrant
Places
The community’s vision for the
future of the Redding Riverfront is
the key foundational piece for the
Specific Plan process.

It represents the overarching
aspirational framework for how the
community would like to see the
area change, improve, and be
enhanced in the future.

As the City and community move
through the Specific Plan process, all
planning concepts, ideas, designs,
policies, and programs considered
for inclusion in the plan must be
consistent with the seven Vision and
Guiding Principles.

VISION FRAMEWORK AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES 13
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT A

A HEALTHY AND RESILIENT NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Packet Pg. 42714Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding A.1 Celebrate the immense natural
beauty of the Sacramento River
and Redding Riverfront area.

A.2 Protect and identify opportunities
to restore sensitive natural
communities that support
biodiversity to ensure the longterm health of the Sacramento River ecosystem.

A.3 Create opportunities for native fish,
animals, and birds to thrive
throughout their entire life cycles.

A.4 Require development and
activities near the Sacramento
River and/or critical habitat areas
to be compatible, complimentary,
and low (or no) impact.

A.5 Mitigate noise and light impacts
on sensitive natural communities.

A.6 Identify opportunities to create
more public open space to support
the “re-wilding” of the Riverfront
area.

A.7 Comply with all statutory and
regulatory requirements for the
Riverfront area.

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT A

A HEALTHY AND RESILIENT NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Packet Pg. 42815Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT B
RESPECTING THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY:

PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
Packet Pg. 42916Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding B.1 Honor the deep Indigenous cultural
connections to the Redding
Riverfront area.

B.2 Engage the Indigenous community
and include them in land use,
habitat protection, recreation, and
cultural landscapes discussions and
decisions.

B.3 Protect Indigenous sacred sites and
cultural resources.

B.4 Maintain Indigenous connections
and access to land, river, and
animals.

B.5 Explore opportunities and
partnerships for creating
Indigenous-owned and -operated
cultural centers and spaces.

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT B
RESPECTING THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY:

PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
Packet Pg. 43017Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT C

ECONOMICALLY VIABLE AND THRIVING ARTS,

CULTURAL, AND ENTERTAINMENT VENUES
Packet Pg. 43118Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding C.1 Allow for a range of activities, events,
economic drivers, and programs
through multi-faceted, flexible
facilities, so Redding remains the
center for arts, culture, and
entertainment for the region.

C.2 Support the viability and success of
historical uses and arts, cultural, sports,
and entertainment events and venues
in the area that are a key part of the
unique history and identity of
Redding.

C.3 Ensure that new venues and
destinations are scaled and
programmed to address local and
visitor desires while also being
economically viable.

C.4 Ensure that new venues and
destinations are designed in such a
way that they are efficient to maintain
and operate, supporting their longterm financial success.

C.5 Work with Cultural District partners to
enhance public art, cultural, and
entertainment elements so the
Riverfront is a highlight of the
designated Redding Cultural District.

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT C
ENVIRONMENTALLY-SENSITIVE AND ECONOMICALLYVIABLE ARTS, CULTURAL, AND ENTERTAINMENT VENUES Packet Pg. 43219Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT D

APPROPRIATE SCALE AND USES
Packet Pg. 43320Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding D.1 Require new buildings and uses to reflect
the scale and character of Redding.

D.2 Design community destinations that are
safe, well-lit, easy to access, and ADA
accessible.

D.3 Maintain the personality and character of
the existing surrounding neighborhoods
and identify opportunities to increase
neighborhood-focused amenities.

D.4 For the Northern Riverfront:
 Create vibrant and active public uses that
support locals and visitors.
 Identify ways to maintain or reduce
developed site coverage.

D.5 For the Southern Riverfront:
 Consider opportunities to support
local housing needs.
 Consider how development on Park
Marina Drive will impact existing and
future circulation to reduce
congestion.
 Create opportunities for private
recreation and amenities on/next to
the quarry ponds.
 Consider additional commercial,
restaurants, and mixed-use projects
along Park Marina Drive that are
compatible with surrounding
neighborhoods.

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT D

APPROPRIATE SCALE AND USES
Packet Pg. 43421Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT E

WORLD-CLASS RECREATION AND ACTIVITIES
Packet Pg. 43522Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding E.1 Provide additional opportunities
for boating, fishing, kayaking, and
other on-the-water activities.

E.2 Promote aquatic activities in areas
that are accessible and safe (e.g.,
calm water, warmer temperatures,
away from boating activities).

E.3 Promote outdoor activities and
connections to nature that support
health and wellbeing.

E.4 Leverage the Redding Riverfront as a
“base camp” for outdoor enthusiast
visiting the regions outdoor
destinations.

E.5 Focus low-impact activities within
public areas and sensitive habitats
(Northern Riverfront, Sacramento
River) and more intense activities
within private outdoor spaces and
quarry ponds.

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT E

WORLD-CLASS RECREATION AND ACTIVITIES
Packet Pg. 43623Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT F

CONNECTED SPACES
Packet Pg. 43724Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding F.1 Expand opportunities for people to
connect with natural areas and the
Sacramento River.

F.2 Enhance vehicle, transit, bicycle,
and pedestrian connections from
existing neighborhoods to the
area, and between major
destinations within the area.

F.3 Identify ways to reconnect the
Northern and Southern Riverfronts
to each other and to Downtown.

F.4 Identify parking locations, types, and
management strategies to ensure
that current and future uses and
activities have adequate (but not
excessive) parking.

F.5 Require new uses and spaces to be
fully ADA accessible; expand ADA
accessibility to and within existing
uses and neighborhoods.

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT F

CONNECTED SPACES
Packet Pg. 43825Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION ELEMENT G

MEMORABLE AND VIBRANT PLACES
Packet Pg. 43926Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding G.1 Make the Redding Riverfront safe,
visible, welcoming, and walkable.

G.2 Consider community gathering
spaces for the community to share,
including community gardens, dog
parks and pocket parks, outdoor
music venues, and public art.

G.3 Create development regulations,
design guidelines, and
implementation strategies that are
tailored to the Redding Riverfront.

G.4 Identify and address any constraints
imposed by the State of California
2019 Surplus Lands Act.

G.5 Leverage the current Specific Plan
and community process to:
 Analyze the economic feasibility of a
range of private projects (new
development, recreation).
 Identify public investment costs and
grant funding opportunities (ecosystem
restoration, open space enhancements,
infrastructure, recreation).

Guiding Principles

VISION ELEMENT G

MEMORABLE AND VIBRANT PLACES
Packet Pg. 44027Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM
Land Uses / Mobility / Activities
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM
The Vision Framework
Diagram is a high-level
summary of emerging
preservation, restoration,
land use, circulation and
activation strategies for
the Riverfront area.

It is based on the Vision
and Guiding Principles,
and extensive
discussions with the
Community Coalition,
City leaders, community
interest groups, property
owners, and Redding
residents.

Civic and Cultural
Visitor Hospitality Core
Waterfront Commercial
Riverfront Office and Commercial
Mixed-Use
Medium-Intensity Residential
State Route 44 (freeway)
Commercial Recreation
Boat Ramps
Indigenous Cultural Space
New Bicycle/Pedestrian Crossing
City Street
Open Space and Habitat Restoration

LAND USES

MOBILITY

ACTIVITIES
City Street (within the Riverfront area)
On-Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Path
River Greenway Trail
New or Improved Intersection
Active Recreation
29 Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Civic and Cultural
Visitor Hospitality Core
Waterfront Commercial
Riverfront Office and Commercial
Mixed-Use
Medium-Intensity Residential
State Route 44 (freeway)
Commercial Recreation
Boat Ramps
Indigenous Cultural Space
New Bicycle/Pedestrian Crossing
City Street

VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM
Open Space and Habitat Restoration

LAND USES

MOBILITY

ACTIVITIES
The diagram includes
the following:

Land Uses
General areas where preservation,
restoration, recreation and/or
development activities are allowed
or not allowed.

Mobility
Changes to the circulation network
necessary to improve safety, multi-
modal access and circulation.

Activities
Specific areas for key features,
amenities and activities.

City Street (within the Riverfront area)
On-Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Path
River Greenway Trail
New or Improved Intersection
Active Recreation
30 Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Open Space and Habitat Restoration

ALLOWED USES
 Intended as a preservation tool – allowed uses are
limited to those which are consistent with the
undeveloped nature of the lands, such as habitat
restoration, passive recreation, and community
and sacred gathering spaces.
 Provides corridors for trails, public utilities, streets, and other necessary public improvements.
 Provides areas for floodplain management.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density N/A
Lot Area
and Width
N/A
Height N/A
Setbacks N/A
Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 300 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

Example
Existing Condition Example
Existing Condition
31 Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Active Recreation
ALLOWED USES  Intended to allow outdoor spaces for large gatherings, active programming and events, and
similar uses.
 Allows limited, smaller-scale commercial that is
accessory to the recreational use is permitted.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density N/A
Lot Area
and Width N/A
Height N/A
Setbacks N/A
Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 300 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

Example
Example Example
32 Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Mixed
-Use

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density 10,000 square feet of commercial on the ground floor; 8 dwelling units per acre (residential)
Lot Area
and Width
Lot Area: 7,500 square feet (min)
Width: 70-80 feet
Height 45 feet
Setbacks Front: 10 feet; Side and Rear: 10 feet; Corner Side: 10 feet Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 300 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

ALLOWED USES  Provides areas for new neighborhoods with a mix of land uses in a compact pattern to reduce
dependency on automobiles, improve air quality,
and promote high-quality, interactive
communities.
 Ensures an appropriate mix and intensity of uses
with a dense concentration of activity in the core
and lower densities extending outward.

Example
Example Example
33 Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Civic and Cultural

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density Sized to host approximately 8,000 person events.

Lot Area
and Width N/A
Height 75 feet for main structure, 90 feet for articulation.

Setbacks Minimum 20 feet.

Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 300 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

ALLOWED USES  Provides a dedicated space for major public civic, arts, cultural, and sports venues that serve the
needs of the Redding community and visitors.
 Allows flexibility for activities to be located both
within buildings and outdoors, depending on the
type and format of the event.

Example
Example Example
34 Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Visitor Hospitality Core

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density Maximum Building Size: 60,000 square feet
Lot Area
and Width
Lot Area: 7,500 square feet (min)
Width: 70-80 feet
Height 45 feet (max)
Setbacks Front: 15 feet; Side and Rear: None (unless buffer yard is required); Corner Side: 10 feet
Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 300 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

ALLOWED USES  Provides space for visitor centers, hotels and lodging, restaurants, and smaller conference
facilities, supported by accessory retail uses.

Example
Example Example
Example
35 Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Waterfront Commercial

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density 4,000 square feet (min) to over 30,000 square feet (max, with a permit)
Lot Area
and Width
Lot Area: 7,500 square feet (min)
Width: 70 feet
Height 50 feet (max)
Setbacks Front: 10 feet; Side and Rear: 10 feet; Corner Side: 10 feet Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 150 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

ALLOWED USES  Provides space for professional office, retail, service commercial, and sit-down restaurant uses
with appropriate and compatible accessory uses.
 Allows rest homes, nursing homes, daycare
facilities, religious, educational, cultural, and
public utility uses.
 Requires smaller-scale development given parcel
sizes and depths.

Example Example Example
Example
Example
36 Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Riverfront Office and Commercial

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density Maximum Building Size: 60,000 square feet
Lot Area
and Width
Lot Area: 7,500 square feet
Width: 70 feet
Corner Width: 80 feet
Height 45 feet (max)
Setbacks Front: 15 feet; Side and Rear: none; Corner Side: 10 feet Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 150 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

ALLOWED USES
 Provides space for retail stores, offices, personalservices, financial, sit-down restaurant, and personal services uses with appropriate and
compatible accessory uses.
 Allows private schools, day-care facilities,
convalescent hospitals, religious, educational,
cultural, and public utility uses.
 Allows larger-scale development given parcel
sizes and depths.

Example
Example Example
37 Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding VISION FRAMEWORK DIAGRAM | Medium Intensity Residential

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Density 10 dwelling units per acre (max)
Lot Area
and Width
Lot Area: 10,000 square feet
Width: 80 feet
Lot Coverage: up to 70 percent
Height 45 feet (max)
Setbacks Front: 15 feet; Side: 5-10 feet; Rear: 10 feet; Corner Side: 15 feet
Sacramento
River Edge
No new buildings or structures within 150 feet of the top of bank of the Sacramento River.

ALLOWED USES
 Provides space for multiple-family housing
ranging from townhouses to apartments. Note
that this is an existing use already within the
Riverfront area.

Example Existing Condition
Example
38 Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

NORTHERN RIVERFRONT CONCEPTS
Habitat Restoration / Passive Recreation / Indigenous Cultural Space / Civic and Cultural Venues Area / Community Sports, Cultural and Arts District / Highway 44 Redesign Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Habitat Restoration
Mill Creek Habitat Restoration – Walla Walla, WA STRATEGIES  Work with local Wintu tribes, environmental
scientists, biologist and Federal/State agencies
to complete fish and wildlife habitat
restoration projects in the Northern Riverfront.
 Ensure these projects focus on the removal of
invasive species and bringing back native
plant and animal species to the area.

Mill Creek Habitat
Restoration
Formed a partnership between the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation, the City of Walla Walla, and
landowners to rewater 31 miles of Mill Creek
and support passage for threatened summer
steelhead and bull trout to upstream habitat.

Saw Mill River
Created and restored aquatic habitats,
including tidal pools, freshwater pools, and
riparian plantings.

Red Cliff Wetlands
Restoration
Restored and protected wetland areas to
maintain critical wildlife habitat, meet
watershed goals, and contribute to the region's
overall ecological health.

EXAMPLES
Example
40 Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Habitat Restoration
Saw Mill River Restoration – Westchester County, NY Red Cliff Wetlands Restoration – WI Example Example
41 Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Passive Recreation
Chattahoochee Nature Center – Roswell, GA STRATEGIES
 Create an interconnected network of lowimpact trails, bridges, walkways and viewing platforms along the Sacramento River and
through natural areas in the Northern
Riverfront.
 Create a series of unique destinations for
people to rest, view nature and the river, and
increase connections to the natural
environment.

Chattahoochee
Nature Center
Included 27 acres of woodland and wetland
trails, a Nature Center, and a river boardwalk
with rehabilitated animals along the route.

EXAMPLES
Example
* Similar facilities currently exist in the Study Area
42 Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Chattahoochee Nature Center
– Roswell, GA
NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Passive Recreation
Example Example
43 Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Indigenous Cultural Space
Redding Rodeo Grounds – Redding, CA STRATEGIES
 Create a dedicated space within the Northern
Riverfront, adjacent to the Sacramento River,
that can be used by the Wintu people for:
a. Prayer, reflection, healing and
remembrance.
b. Land-based language, engagement,
and education.
c. Access and revitalization of river lifeways.
d. Art making, storytelling, and visibility.
e. Other activities.

The Squamish Lil'wat
Cultural Centre
Created a space to share cultural knowledge,
inspire understanding, and facilitate respect
amongst all people. The building was designed
to evoke the longhouses of the Squamish
people and the Istken (traditional earthen pit
house) of the Lil’wat people with a modern
architectural interpretation.

EXAMPLES
Existing Event
44 Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding The Squamish Lil’wat Cultural Centre
– Vancouver, BC
NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Indigenous Cultural Space
Example Example
45 Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
Tahoe Blue Event Center – Stateline, NV STRATEGIES
 Consolidate civic and cultural venues in the
core of the Northern Riverfront to provide a
greater buffer from the Sacramento River and
to create more efficient operations.
 Focus on maintaining the current (2025) event
capacity of approximately 5,000 to 8,000
person events, but in new or remodeled
facilities that allow for modernization, better
programming, and additional types of events
and activities (recreational sports
tournaments).

Tahoe Blue Event
Center
Included an indoor multi-use arena with a
capacity of 5,000 that can host a variety of
concerts, sporting events (e.g., tournament
sports, minor league hockey team) and civic
events.

Ford Idaho Center Hosts the annual Snake River Stampede, considered one of the nation's top rodeos.

EXAMPLES
* Similar facilities currently exist in the Study Area
Example
46 Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
Ford Idaho Center – Nampo, ID Heartland Events Center – Grand Island, NE Margaret Court Areana – New York, NY
Example
Example
Example
47 Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding LEGEND

1. Grandstand improvements
with increased seating over
chutes and pens.

2. Enhanced vendor and
spectator promenade.

3. Temporary Rodeo livestock
area.

4. VIP/Heritage Club over rough
stock chutes.

5. RV Hookups to support
Rodeo and other events.

6. Civic Auditorium interior
enhancements.

7. New entrance lobby and
concession area.

EXISTING NEAR-TERM OPTION
Key Aspects of
This Option . . .

COST AND TIMING
 Lower initial costs for focused
improvements to both facilities.
 Would require improvements to
outdated infrastructure under the
current Rodeo.

PROGRAM FOR VENUES
 Keeps the same programming for
the Rodeo.
 Allows the Civic Auditorium to
expand meeting space.

DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT
 Maintains the existing
development footprint.
 Provides some opportunities for
habitat restoration along the river.

NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
1 2
4 3
5 6
7 48
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding LEGEND

1. Grandstand.

2. Shared Space.

3. Clubhouse

4. Heritage Center

5. Concessions and Restrooms

6. New 150’ x 300’ Area.

7. Civic Auditorium interior
enhancements.

8. New entrance lobby, concession
area, and flexible 40,000 square
foot event center.

9. Temporary Rodeo livestock area.

10.RV Hookups to support Rodeo
and other events.

11. Reserve space (recovered land
from current Rodeo operations).

LONGER-TERM OPTION A
Key Aspects of
This Option . . .

COST AND TIMING
 Would be a more significant
investment in a new outdoor
Rodeo/Concert venue.
 Would include significant public
infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc.)

PROGRAM FOR VENUES
 Allows for a modern/competitive
Rodeo set-up.
 Allows flexible and expanded
event programming.

DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT
 Reduces the overall development
footprint for the area.
 Provides significant opportunities
for habitat restoration along the
river.

NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
7 3 1
2 4
5 6
9 10 11
8 EXISTING
49 Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding LEGEND

1. New multi-use and multifunction event venue. The
new facility could include a
retractable roof or opening
wall to allow both indoor and
outdoor events.

2. Reserve space (recovered
land from current Rodeo
operations).

3. Increased open space due to
the consolidation of uses in a
new facility.

LONGER-TERM OPTION B
Key Aspects of
This Option . . .

COST AND TIMING
 Would be a more significant
investment in an entirely new event
venue.
 Would include significant public
infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc.)

PROGRAM FOR VENUES
 Allows for a modern, competitive
and highly flexible venue.
 Allows expanded indoor
programming, including sports
events and larger concerts.

DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT
 Reduces the overall development
footprint for the area.
 Provides significant opportunities
for habitat restoration along the
river.

NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
1 2

EXISTING
3 50
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
This graphic depicts an
initial high-level concept for
the Northern Riverfront.

The updated Specific Plan
will provide guidance on
land uses, activities,
programs, development
standards and design
guidelines.

Actual future projects
proposed on either public
or private property will be
reviewed by the City for
consistency with the
updated Specific Plan.

Indigenous
Cultural Area
Sundial
Bridge
Flex Space/
Rodeo
Staging
Area Plaza
Active
Recreation
Passive Recreation,
Habitat Restoration
and Open Space
Boat Launch
Parking
Parking
Multi-Use Venue
Civic Events
Rodeo
Concerts
Conference
Tournament Sports
Graduations
Etc.

Turtle Bay
Exploration
Park (existing)
Sheraton
Hotel
(existing)
Visitor/
Lodging
Mixed-Use Area
Passive Recreation,
Habitat Restoration
and Open Space
51 Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Use/Activity Existing Facilities Near-Term Option
Focused Upgrades
Long-Term Option A
Separate Facilities
Long-Term Option B
Single Multi-Use Facility
Rodeo 5,000 people 6,000 – 6,500 people 8,000 people
new shared multi-use
outdoor stadium
7,000 – 8,000 people
new multi-use arena
Outdoor
Concerts
8,000 people
lawn area
8,000 people
lawn area
Civic
Auditorium
2,000 people
seated only
2,400 people
seated + standing
2,000 people
seated only
2,400 people
seated + standing
2,000 people
seated only
2,400 people
seated + standing
Conference 5,000 square feet
located on the ground floor of the
current Civic Auditorium
5,000 square feet
located on the ground floor of the
current Civic Auditorium
45,000 square feet
5,000 in Civic + 40,000 in
conference expansion
45,000 square feet
as part of the new multi-use
arena facility
NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Civic and Cultural Venues Area
The table below identifies current programming for existing facilities (e.g., Rodeo Stadium, Civic Auditorium, Lawn) and anticipated new capacity for the Near-Term and Long-Term options. As shown in the table, modernized/consolidated facilities allow for better types of events while keeping the overall program numbers largely the same (5,000 to 8,000 person events). 52 Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Community Sports, Cultural and Arts District Garland Cultural Arts District – Garland, TX STRATEGIES  Establish a “Riverfront Consortium” to manage all planning and operations within the Northern Riverfront to:
a. Ensure the City maintains land ownership and
operational control over the Northern Riverfront.
b. Include representatives from the City, Rodeo, Civic, Tribal Liaison, Turtle Bay, Sheraton, tenants, public
agencies, and other partners.
c. Coordinates decisions around events, programming,
maintenance, operations, parking management,
infrastructure improvements, security, marketing,
public relations, and other activities.

Garland Cultural
Arts District
Manages a range of facilities and provide economic development and enhances the quality of life for Garland residents.

Tacoma Venue
and Events
Manages Tacoma’s venues and supports a vibrant and thriving cultural sector, community and region.

Denver Arts
and Venues
Operates the region’s facilities, including Red Rocks Amphitheatre, Denver Performing Arts Complex, and Theatre at Loretto Heights.

EXAMPLES
54 Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Connection
Redesigned
Boulevard Street
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Overcrossing
Boat Launch
Mixed-Use Area
Highway 44 to Boulevard
Street Transition Area
New
Intersection
New
Intersection
Visitor/
Lodging
Visitor/
Lodging
Active
Recreation
Passive Recreation,
Habitat Restoration
and Open Space
Highway 44
Freeway
This graphic depicts an initial high-level concept for the Northern Riverfront. The updated Specific Plan will provide guidance on land uses, activities, programs, development standards and design guidelines. Actual future projects proposed on either public or private property will be reviewed by the City for consistency with the updated Specific Plan. 55 Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign
Highway 44 – Existing Design STRATEGIES
 Create a new “boulevard street” with
improved vehicle, transit, bicycle, and
pedestrian access between the Northern and
Southern Riverfront, and to Downtown.
 Include a second entrance/intersection into
the Northern Riverfront to improve visitor
access and public safety.
 Create opportunities for mixed-use buildings
fronting the redesigned street to support
economic development in an area that is away
from the Sacramento River.

Amador Causeway
Includes a three-mile causeway that offers the
scenic views of the city with dedicated bicycle
paths and a promenade.

Richenbacker
Causeway
Includes a landscaped median and separated
bicycle and pedestrian facilities to improve
mobility and safety.

EXAMPLES
Existing Condition
56 Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign
Amador Causeway – Panama City, Panama Richenbacker Causeway- Miami, FL Example Example
57 Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign

EXISTING STREET DESIGN
Elevated Bridge Portion of Highway 44, Looking East
58 Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign
ALTERNATIVE A: MULTI-USE TRAIL
Elevated Bridge Portion of Highway 44, Looking East
59 Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign
ALTERNATIVE B: GREENWAY RIVER PARK CONNECTOR
Elevated Bridge Portion of Highway 44, Looking East
60 Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign

EXISTING STREET DESIGN
Near the ACID Canal, Looking East
61 Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding NORTHERN RIVERFRONT | Highway 44 Redesign
ALTERNATIVE C: BOULEVARD CONCEPT
Near the ACID Canal, Looking East
62 Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT CONCEPTS
Riverfront Uses / Commercial Recreation / River Greenway Trail / Park Marina Drive Redesign Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Riverfront Uses
Park Marina
Drive Redesign
Riverfront
Greenway Trail
Active
Recreation
Boat
Launch
Lakefront
Promenade
Riverfront Office
and Commercial
Cypress Avenue
Riverfront Office
and Commercial
This graphic depicts an
initial high-level concept for
the Southern Riverfront.

The updated Specific Plan
will provide guidance on
land uses, activities,
programs, development
standards and design
guidelines.

Actual future projects
proposed on private
property will be reviewed by
the City for consistency with
the updated Specific Plan.
64 Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Riverfront Uses

STRATEGIES
 Encourage “water-oriented” development that
helps build a strong relationship with the
lakes and river through strategically proposed
uses, visual and physical connections.
 Create new clusters of commercial (retail and
office) or community-oriented uses fronting
the lakes that benefit the local economy and
support the integration of the riverfront into
the existing public realm of the City.
 Require low-impact buildings and open
spaces that sensitively respond to the unique
character of the area and include connections
to the lakes and Sacramento River.

Old Mill District
Created a mixed-use development that
features a diverse selection of retail, dining, and
entertainment.

EXAMPLES
Old Mill District – Bend, OR
Example
Example
Example
65 Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Commercial Recreation
Lake Britton – Shasta County, CA STRATEGIES
 Provide varied active and passive recreational
activities for all users on or along the river.
 Increase opportunities for the community to
enjoy the river as a resource.
 Ensure that the proposed activities support
and enhance the river’s natural habitat.

Lake Britton
Includes a variety of on-water activities like
swimming, boating, wakeboarding, water
skiing, kayaking and fishing.

EXAMPLES
Example
66 Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | River Greenway Trail
American River Parkway – Sacramento County, CA STRATEGIES  Create a separated bicycle and pedestrian trail
that helps connect people with the
Sacramento River and natural environments*.
 Encourage the River Greenway Trail to
connect to key commercial and dining
destinations in the Southern Riverfront.

American River
Parkway (Jedediah
Smith Memorial Trail)
Includes a 32-mile trail from Folsom to Old
Sacramento along the American River.

Tahoe Lake Trail
Includes a trail network that connects North
Shore communities, businesses and
recreational activities along Lake Tahoe.

Deschutes River Trail
Includes a trail loops around the river while
connecting to pathways located within the Old
Mill District, providing opportunities for
walking, cycling and a range of outdoor
activities.

EXAMPLES
Example
* Similar facilities currently exist in the Study Area
67 Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Tahoe Lake Trail
– North Shore, Tahoe, CA
SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | River Greenway Trail
Example
Example
Example
68 Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Deschutes River Trail
– Bend, OR
SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | River Greenway Trail
Example Example
69 Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Park Marina Drive Redesign
Diestelhorst to Downtown – Redding, CA STRATEGIES
 Improve safety and enhance the street
environment along Park Marina Drive.
 Expand transit, bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure.
 Strategically design the streetscape respond
to the lower-scale residential neighborhoods
along the western side and commercial/office
uses along the eastern side of Park Marina
Drive (sidewalk widths, frontage, landscaping
elements, etc.).

Diestelhorst to
Downtown
Created a key multi-modal connection
between the Riverfront area and Downtown
Redding through the creation of protected
bicycle lanes.

EXAMPLES
* Similar facilities currently exist in Redding
Existing Condition
70 Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

EXISTING STREET DESIGN
Looking North
SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Park Marina Drive Redesign 71
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Park Marina Drive Redesign
ALTERNATIVE A: PROTECTED BIKEWAY AND MULTI-USE TRAIL
Looking North
72 Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Park Marina Drive Redesign
ALTERNATIVE B: WIDER SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES
Looking North
73 Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Park Marina Drive Redesign
ALTERNATIVE C: GATHERING AREAS
Looking North
74 Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding SOUTHERN RIVERFRONT | Park Marina Drive Redesign
ALTERNATIVE D: GRAND PUBLIC SPACE
Looking North
75 Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

SUMMARY AND

NEXT STEPS
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK COMPARISON WITH EMERGING CONCEPTS

VISION ELEMENTS USES/SPACES ACTIVITIES/PROGRAMMING
 Renewed focus on re-wilding the Sacramento
River and areas adjacent to the river.
 A 300-foot setback from the Sacramento River
for new buildings in the Northern Riverfront.
 Potential for additional acres of open space and
habitat restoration in the Northern Riverfront
resulting from the consolidation of civic uses.
 Potential for significant riparian and fish habitat
restoration efforts in partnership with
State/Federal agencies and Tribal partners.
 New low-impact trails and community
gathering spaces.
 New Riverfront Greenway Trail along the
Sacramento River.
 Dedicated space within the Northern Riverfront
and adjacent to the Sacramento River for the
Indigenous community to hold events and
activities.
 Potential new Riverfront Consortium that will
include Tribal representatives.
 Coordination with the civic venues to hold
larger gatherings and events for the Indigenous
community.
 Opportunities to strengthen connections to the
Sacramento River and natural environment.

The table below identifies how the various concepts relate back to the Community’s Vision. 77 Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK COMPARISON WITH EMERGING CONCEPTS

VISION ELEMENTS USES/SPACES ACTIVITIES/PROGRAMMING
 Near- and Long-Term strategies to improve
civic venues in the Northern Riverfront so they
can hold a greater variety of events, while not
increasing the overall capacity of events (more
efficiently hosting 8,000 person events).
 Ability to enhance the Redding Rodeo through
improved and more modern facilities.
 New investments in civic and cultural venues
that are economically feasible and allow
Redding to create a unique destination that
will attract top events.
 New Riverfront Consortium that will organize
programs, events, parking, improvements, and
other operations.
 Require new spaces and buildings in the
Northern and Southern Riverfront to be designed
and scaled in character with the natural
environment.
 Focus larger projects on lots that can provide
larger setbacks and greater buffers from natural
areas and the Sacramento River.
 Create a destination along the Sacramento River
that is unique and does not compete with other
areas in the city (such as Downtown).

The table below identifies how the various concepts relate back to the Community’s Vision. 78 Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK COMPARISON WITH EMERGING CONCEPTS

VISION ELEMENTS USES/SPACES ACTIVITIES/PROGRAMMING
 More opportunities for lake and Sacramento
River access for people (low-impact trails).
 More programming and events in Active
Recreation areas.
 New boat launches.
 Greater variety of active recreational uses in the
private lakes in the Southern Riverfront,
consistent with Federal and State requirements.
 Redesign Highway 44 to create a second entry to
the Northern Riverfront, improving both access
and safety.
 Create new bicycle and pedestrian circulation
networks that will allow access throughout the
Riverfront area and connections to surrounding
neighborhoods and Downtown.
 New key community gathering spaces and
destinations to promote activities and
connections to the Riverfront area.

The table below identifies how the various concepts relate back to the Community’s Vision. 79 Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

VISION FRAMEWORK COMPARISON WITH EMERGING CONCEPTS

VISION ELEMENTS USES/SPACES ACTIVITIES/PROGRAMMING
 Ability to create new public and private uses that
reflect the community’s vision for the area—
strengthening the local and visitor experience
and making the area a more prominent part of
Redding.
 Ability to attract new events and activities to the
Riverfront (while not increasing overall capacity).

The table below identifies how the various concepts relate back to the Community’s Vision. 80 Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

DRAFT RIVERFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN
Following City Council direction on May 20,
2025, the project team will begin preparing
the draft Redding Riverfront Specific Plan.

The new plan will build on the discussions
and materials prepared to-date on the
project.

The plan will include more detail (in the form
of specific policies and standards) about how
the Community Vision will be implemented
as new projects, including environmental
restoration projects, are proposed, reviewed
and approved in the future.

WHAT A SPECIFIC PLAN INCLUDES . . .
 A Community Vision for the future of the Riverfront
Area, supported by guiding principles, goals,
policies, and development standards.
 Design Guidelines that regulate the style and
character of new or substantially remodeled
buildings.
 Economic Analysis, including potential incentives.
 Vehicle, transit, bicycle and pedestrian circulation
plans, including parking.
 Infrastructure capacity analysis.
 Comprehensive environmental analysis.

WHAT A SPECIFIC PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE . . .
 Individual public or private development projects.

All future projects must be consistent with the
requirements outlined in the Redding Riverfront
Specific Plan.
81 Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The project team will also prepare an
environmental analysis of potential impacts
and mitigation measures related to
implementation of the new Redding
Riverfront Specific Plan.

This includes preparing a programmatic
Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)
consistent with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
82 Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding STAY CONNECTED: VISIT THE PROJECT WEBSITE
www.ReddingRiverfront.org
83 Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: ^Emerging Redding Riverfront Concepts (May 2025)(color) (9.4(a)--Redding Redding Riverfront Specific Plan

VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES FRAMEWORK
Final | January 16, 2024
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

PART I INTRODUCTION
Project Area
What Is a Specific Plan?
How Will the Community Be Involved?
Developing a Vision

OPEN HOUSES AND DISCUSSIONS
Community Open Houses
Community Discussions
Key Themes: Assets
Key Themes: Challenges and Opportunities
Key Themes: Vision for the Future

COMMUNITY COALITION
Mission and Charge
Membership
Meetings

VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES
A. A Healthy and Resilient Natural Environment
B. Respecting the Indigenous Community: Past, Present, and Future C. Environmentally Sensitive and Economically Viable Arts, Cultural, and Entertainment Venues D. Appropriate Scale and Uses
E. World-Class Recreation and Activities
F. Connected Spaces
G. Memorable and Vibrant Places

NEXT STEPS
How the Community Can Stay Involved

CONTENTS

PART II

PART III

PART IV
PART V
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific In April 2023, the Redding City Council began a community-led process to update the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan. The purpose of this project is to reintroduce the community to the river by creating a long-term vision for the 380 acres of public and private land and water along the Sacramento River.

The Specific Plan document, which will be developed based on significant community engagement and discussion, will ultimately establish goals, policies, and development standards to guide public and private development, land stewardship and conservation, roadway and infrastructure projects, and other activities within the study area. It will also include a series of implementation strategies necessary to transform the community vision for the Riverfront into a reality.

PART I

INTRODUCTION
1 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Project Area
The Redding Riverfront Specific Plan project area
includes a range of public and private property along
the Sacramento River, generally bounded by the
Redding Memorial Park/Park Marina Drive on the
west, the Sacramento River on the north and east, and
Cypress Avenue on the south.

The project area is adjacent to the Sacramento River
and includes major uses and destinations such as
the Sundial Bridge, Turtle Bay Exploration Park,
Redding Rodeo Grounds, Redding Civic Auditorium,
Sheraton Hotel, Aqua Golf Driving Range, Kutras Park,
and Marina RV Park. The McConnell Arboretum and
Botanical Gardens are located to the north of the area, with Redding River Trail to the east. Redding Library,
City Hall, Redding Memorial Park, Sequoia Middle
School, and Cypress Elementary School are located to
the west of the site.

Study Area Boundary
Land
Parcel Map
Legend
1 inch = 800 feet
44 5
McConnell
Arboretum and
Botanical Gardens
Redding
Memorial
Park
Redding
Library
Sequoia
Middle School
Cypress
Elementary School
Redding
City Hall
Bechelli Lane
Turtle Bay East
Open Space
Redding
River Trail
Aqua Golf
Driving Range
Marina RV
Park
Kutras Park
Sheraton
Redding Hotel Redding Civic
Auditorium
Redding Rodeo
Grounds
Sundial
Bridge
Turtle Bay
Exploration Park
Sacramento River
S Market Street
Hilltop Drive
Hilltop Drive
Hartnell Avenue
S Market Street
East St
S Market Street
Parkview Avenue
Continental Street
Butte Street
Locust Street
Cypress Avenue
Olympus Avenue
South Street
Placer Street
Anderson Cottonwood Canal
Park Ma r ni a Dr vi e
Shasta
Charter Academy Tiger
Field
Education
Study Area Boundary
Parks
Parcel
Major Destinations
Major Roads
River Channel
Water Bodies
Canal
Land
Parcel Map
Legend 1 inch = 800 feet
44 5
McConnell
Arboretum and
Botanical Gardens
Redding
Memorial
Park
Redding
Library
Sequoia
Middle School
Cypress
Elementary School
Redding
City Hall
Bechelli Lane
Turtle Bay East
Open Space
Redding
River Trail
Aqua Golf
Driving Range
Marina RV
Park
Kutras Park
Sheraton
Redding Hotel Redding Civic
Auditorium
Redding Rodeo
Grounds
Sundial
Bridge
Turtle Bay
Exploration Park
Sacramento River
S Market Street
Hilltop Drive
Hilltop Drive
Hartnell Avenue
S Market Street
East St
S Market Street
Parkview Avenue
Continental Street
Butte Street
Locust Street
Cypress Avenue
Olympus Avenue
South Street
Placer Street
Anderson Cottonwood Canal
Park Ma r ni a Dr vi e
Shasta
Charter Academy Tiger
Field
2 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific What Is a Specific Plan?
A Specific Plan is a tool used by the
City of Redding and the community
to implement the broader direction
of the City's General Plan. It provides
specific policies and requirements for
development corresponding to a unique
geographic area. It must include a land
use plan for location and intensity of uses;
have an implementation strategy; address
public infrastructure required to serve
the area; and propose capital project and
infrastructure funding options necessary
to implement the plan. In certain
cases, a Specific Plan can go beyond
policy guidance and include detailed
development standards tailored to the
character and needs of the area.

The Specific Plan process includes robust
environmental review and documentation
under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). The City anticipates that
the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan will
require the creation of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR). The EIR will evaluate
potential environmental impacts of
plan implementation. It will also include
mitigation measures to reduce these
impacts.

The Redding Riverfront Specific Plan
is being led by the City of Redding at
the direction of the City Council. The
Project Team is made up of City of
Redding staff and consultants. In April
2023, the City hired MIG to lead the
specific plan project. MIG is a planning,
environmental, design, and engagement
firm from Sacramento. MIG is supported
by additional engagement, design, and
technical experts from Tawaw Architecture
Collaborative (Indigenous community
engagement and design), GHD
(mobility and infrastructure), Populous
(architectural design), Nichols, Melburg &
Rossetto Architects (architectural design/
local Redding conditions), and Basin
Research (cultural resources).

What a Specific Plan includes . . .
▪ Vision, Goals, Policies, and
Development Regulations unique
to the Redding Riverfront Area
▪ Design Guidelines for new projects
▪ Economic Analysis and Incentives
▪ Circulation Plan (vehicle, bicycles,
pedestrians, parking)
▪ Infrastructure Analysis (capacity
and funding)
▪ Environmental Analysis
What a Specific Plan does not include . . .
▪ Individual public or private development
projects (those are proposed after the
Specific Plan is adopted, and they must
be consistent with the Plan)
3 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific How Will the Community Be Involved?
Robust and transparent community involvement is vital to this project. There will be multiple opportunities for community members to participate both in person and through online discussions during the project. The Project Team has prepared a detailed Community Involvement Strategy (CIS) that includes engagement goals and metrics to ensure broad participation.

Over the course of the two-year process, the Project Team will ensure that there is broad community support on the vision, goals, projects, and components included in the updated plan. This report summarizes the first major step in the project, which is the creation of an emerging Vision and Guiding Principles Framework.

Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring
2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4
Community
Discussions and
Events Open Houses and
Community
Discussions
Community
Coalition
Major Reports
and Analysis
2 0 2 5
City
Commission and
Council Review
Community Coalition Meetings
Pop-up Events
and Community
Discussions
Community Design
Charrettes and
Discussions
Draft Riverfront
Specific Plan
and EIR
Final Riverfront
Specific Plan
and EIR
Summer
City Council
Meeting
City Council
Public Hearings
Phase 1: Kick-Off
and Visioning
Phase 2: Analysis
and Opportunities
Phase 4: Specific Plan
and EIR Development
Phase 3: Plan
Concepts Development
Commission and City
Council Meetings City Council
Meeting
Existing
Conditions
Alternatives
Summary
Draft Plan
Workshop and
Discussions
Commission and
City Council Meetings
Vision and Guiding
Principles
Framework
Overall Project Schedule
4 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific One of the first major project activities was a series of Community Open Houses and discussions held in August 2023.

These events provided an opportunity for the Project Team to listen to the community and solicit ideas on a vision for Redding Riverfront’s future. They also provided a forum to hear feedback on assets, challenges, and opportunities that will help inform the Specific Plan. The following section summarizes the events and community members comments, concerns, and ideas for the future of the Redding Riverfront area.

PART II

OPEN HOUSES AND DISCUSSIONS
5 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Community Open Houses
The City hosted two Community Open
Houses on August 14, 2023, at the Civic
Auditorium. The events were organized
as open sessions for the duration of the
time with two formal presentations given
at 2:00 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. Following
each presentation, participants were
encouraged to join a larger group
discussion facilitated by a member
of the Project Team. This provided an
opportunity for community members
to ask questions and hear from each
other. The Project Team documented
verbal comments from each large group
discussion in a wallgraphic.

Over 200 community members attended
the Community Open Houses and shared
their ideas, concerns, and vision(s) for the
future of the Redding Riverfront area.
6 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Community Discussions
On August 15, 2023, the Project Team
interviewed key community members,
business and property owners,
and appointed officials as an initial
engagement activity. Participants were
asked for their perspectives on key
issues and opportunities for the Redding
Riverfront that can be addressed during
the Specific Plan process.

Interview participants received an
invitation directly from City staff, either by
phone or email. The interviews consisted
of one hour slots that were conducted in
person at the Redding Civic Auditorium.

Combined Community
Feedback Summary
The Community Open House and
Community Discussions generated a
wealth of ideas, concerns, and vision
concepts for the future of the Riverfront
area. The following pages are a combined
summary of the major themes heard
during the open houses and discussions.

Anderson-Cottonwood
Irrigation District
Ronnean Lund, Steve McCarley
Asphalt Cowboys
Cameron Middleton
Chamber of Commerce
Jake Mangas
Civic/Advance Redding
Julie Dyar
Community Leader
Former CA State Senator
and Redding Mayor Maurice
Johannessen
Flyshop/Fishing Community
Terry Jepsen
Hixenbaugh
Steven and Annette Hixenbaugh
Indigenous Community Group
Kenwani Kravitz (Wintu/Pit River),
Radley Davis (Wintu/Pit River),
Michelle Radcliff Garcia (Wintu),
Fred Mankins (Global Cultural
Resources), Lillie Lucero (Redding
Rancheria), Lorraine Lindsay
(Wintu), Jonathon Freeman
(Chichimeca)
The McConnell Foundation
Shannon Phillips
North Valley Catholic Social
Services (NVCSS)
Jessica Suyapa
Office Group
Benjamin Claassen, Wayne Maire
Property Owner
Chris Kutras
Redding Rodeo
Cindy Schonholtz
Residential Group
Nancy Milton, RG Coop
Riverside Eyecare
Scott Sumsion
Shasta Environmental Alliance
David Ledger
Turtle Bay
Lindsay Myers
VIVA Downtown
John Truitt
Wintu Audubon Society
Bruce Webb
Community Discussion Participants
Individual or Small Group Interviews
7 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Key Themes
Assets
Natural Beauty and Ecosystem
The Riverfront’s natural beauty is its
greatest asset, along with the ecosystem
it provides to many native and specialstatus species living along the Riverfront, including salmon, trout, bald eagles, deer,
otters, raccoons, other fish, and migrating
birds.

Riparian Habitat
The Redding Riverfront is an expansive
riparian zone providing habitat for many
wildlife species including salmon, eagles,
herons, sandhill cranes, and neotropical
migrant birds. Native plants and trees help
sustain a thriving ecosystem and provide
much-needed shade and cooling.

Parkland and Open Space
Parkland and open space, with trails
along the Riverfront, are easily accessible
to residents and visitors and provide
opportunities to view and appreciate
natural beauty, flora, and fauna.

Trails and Walking Paths
Existing walking, hiking, and biking trails
in the parkland and along the Riverfront
support active transportation and provide
recreational access.

Local History and Culture
The Redding Riverfront has a rich history
and is culturally significant to the Wintu
Tribe. Some monuments in the area honor
Wintu history. There is also a history of
Redding’s fishing, timber, and gravel
industries within the study area.

Unique Attractions
The Sundial Bridge, Redding Civic
Auditorium, Redding Rodeo Grounds,
Turtle Bay Exploration Park and Museum,
and Aqua Golf are all unique physical
attractions that make the Riverfront a
destination for residents and visitors.

Existing Uses and Users
The Riverfront is home to a wide range
of uses and users that support both the
local community and tourism industries.

These include office and commercial
businesses in the Southern Riverfront, the
Sheraton Hotel, Bethel Church (currently
leasing space in the Civic Auditorum),
the Redding Rodeo, and many others.

The Riverfront area also includes unique
infrastructure, such as the ACID irrigation
channel, the Monolith, and the public boat
ramp.

Special Events
Events such as concerts, conferences, and
fireworks are activities the community
would like to see continued or even
expanded in the future. These events
create unique opportunities to attract
people to the Riverfront during different
times of the year.
8 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Environmental Protection
There are concerns about the conflicts
between the expansion of uses and
activities, and the protection of natural
resources, including open space, bird, fish,
and other animal habitats.

Appropriate Planning and Design
There needs to be an accurate, objective,
and transparent environmental analysis
process conducted as part of the Specific
Plan update. Core to this is the need
to protect assets as part of the entire
planning process, and creating policy
language that protects assets as part of
the entire project.

Land Ownership and Control
There is a desire to craft a Specific Plan
that influences the larger land owners to
work in harmony, maximizing the benefits
of the Riverfront area for all residents,
while also enhancing the natural and
cultural environment.

Indigenous Cultural Resources
There is a need to protect Native and
other cultural resources. This includes
creating mapping and analysis for native
artifact locations, maintaining Indigenous
connections and access to land and river,
and balancing native historical awareness
and current community needs.

Redding Rodeo Association
There was discussion over the question
of keeping, maintaining, expanding, and/
or moving the rodeo grounds. Many
comments were made in support of the
Redding Rodeo and their activities and
events, noting that they are important to
many local residents and tourists.

Mobility, Access, and Traffic
There are concerns about overall
circulation and access limitations
throughout the Riverfront area. There
is a desire to address vehicle traffic,
circulation, access (including emergency
vehicles) and effective buffers to protect
riparian areas. New/expanded trail and
path connections that can create seamless
multi-modal transportation in both the
Northern and Southern Riverfront was
also raised by the community. Lastly, there
is a need to improve safety for pedestrians
and bicyclists, create more transportation
options, and develop a comprehensive
traffic and parking study.

New Mixed-Use Development
Some in the community are supportive
of new development, and there is an
interest in mixed-use development along
Park Marina Drive. Participants envisioned
an active first floor with restaurants and
shops and residential or office space on
upper floors.

Family-Friendly Activities
New development should be designed to
attract families and people of all ages to
participate in recreation, shopping, eating,
and water access.

Public Amenities and Activities
Public amenities such as a playground,
aquatic center, gardens, arboretum, and
restrooms should be built and maintained
for residents and visitors to enjoy when
visiting the Riverfront.

Safety
Safety is a concern near the Civic
Auditorium and Redding Rodeo
Grounds, and in the parking lots. It was
recommended that better activation of
the area and well-lit paths and public
spaces at night would help resolve these
issues.

Key Themes
Challenges and Opportunities
9 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Key Themes
Vision for the Future
Protect the Natural Environment
and Resources
Conserve and enhance the natural
environment, including: protecting habitat,
bio-diversity, and the health of the river;
limiting waterfront development; limiting
expanded development footprints; sharing
and celebrating the extensive natural
resources; and creating habitats for
protected species.

Enhance Public Access and Recreation
Expand public access and uses; restore
and/or create new public parks and open
space areas; and preserve fish, bird, and
riparian habitat while providing trails,
beaches, and natural landscapes for
public.

Establish Clear Uses and
Development Standards
Create a clear vision for new development
in the Riverfront, supported by
requirements that ensure there is design
cohesion, ease of access and circulation,
and protection of natural resources as new
or renovated development is created.

Expand Outdoor Facilities
and Attractions
Create a thriving and active destination
for both residents and visitors that reflects
the small-town character of Redding
with year-round riverfront activities and
amenities that compare with other wateroriented destinations.

Engage the Indigenous Community
Ensure all Tribes and Indigenous
community members are engaged
throughout this process and are involved
in decision-making. Native input should be
provided on all proposed developments.

Native sites and cultural resources should
be protected. The Wintu Tribe should be
continually engaged as a resource for
helping preserve natural resources.

Support the Redding Rodeo
Support the modernization of the rodeo
grounds, including potential improvements
to make it a multiuse venue. Reimagine
the current use of the grounds so that
it can be activated year-round for other
public events.

Ensure Transparent and Balanced
Community Outreach
Notice and record all meetings and
workshops; ensure authentic, broad, and
well-noticed outreach activities; prioritize
those most impacted; have residents on
the Community Coalition; bring together
opposing viewpoints; make resources and
materials available to the public; and allow
people to post comments on the project
website.

Creating a Cohesive Vision
Developing a vision where all property
owners and involved groups will be willing
to cooperate was acknowledged as a
challenge for the Specific Plan.
10 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Overview
The City of Redding formed a Community Coalition to
advise the Project Team on the development of the Vision and Guiding Principles for the Riverfront Specific Plan. Coalition members include representatives from a variety of groups and organizations, representing a range of community interests and perspectives. The following section provides and overview of the Coalition purpose and mission, membership, and meeting structure.

PART III

COMMUNITY COALITION
11 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Mission and Charge
The mission and charge of the Coalition
was to develop a Vision Statement and
Guiding Principles for land within the
study area that will be presented to
the broader community for review and
feedback. During their meetings, they
reviewed, evaluated, and discussed
information and concepts for the study
area, including future uses and areas of
preservation and/or rehabilitation. They
also assessed the feasibility of a range of
uses and activities in the study area, with
the support of technical data and analysis
provided by the Project Team.
12 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

COMMUNITY COALITION MEMBERS
Lindsay Myers
Turtle Bay and Sheraton
Julie Dyar
Advance Redding
Chris Kutras
Kutras Properties
Melissa Buciak
Garden Tract Resident
Lesley Jessee
The McConnell Foundation
Jocelyn Olson
Kutras Tract Resident
Danica Helgren
Southern Waterfront Business Owner
(Urban Retreat Spa)
Benjamin Claassen
Southern Waterfront Business Owner
(Shasta Charter Academy)
Michele Goedert
Planning Commissioner
Josh Divine
CSAC Commissioner
Garrett Miller
Redding Resident
Baron Browning
Redding Rodeo Association
Cameron Middleton
Asphalt Cowboys
Gary Rickard*
Wintu Tribe of Northern California
Jack Potter, Jr.*
Redding Rancheria
Ryan Haedrich
Redding Chamber of Commerce
Todd Jones
Shasta EDC
Rebeca Ladrón de Guevara
Wintu Audubon Society
Christina Prosperi
Caltrans District 2 Complete
Streets GIS Manager
Terry Jepsen
Redding Fly Shop
Membership
Working with the Project Team, the City
selected 20 people to be members of
the Community Coalition. The goal was
to form a group that could represent a
range of perspectives and insights related
to the Redding Riverfront area. The final
Community Coalition composition (shown
to the right) included property owners,
business owners, residential tenants, City
Commissioners, residents, and individuals
representing the Redding Rodeo
Association, non-profits, Wintu Tribe,
Redding Rancheria, Redding Chamber of
Commerce, environmental organizations,
and mobility organizations.

Meeting Format
The Community Coalition convened for
four public meetings in October and
November 2023. Each meeting lasted
approximately two hours and was held on
a Monday night at Redding City Hall. The
meetings were live streamed and there
were opportunities for public comment at
the end of the agenda. Public comments
were made either in-person or via email to
[email protected].
* Invited to participate on the Community Coalition, but did not attend a meeting. 13 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific COMMUNITY COALITION MEETING #1 | October 9, 2023
The Coalition reviewed the Riverfront Specific Plan project purpose and schedule, area history and current context, overall project goals, and community feedback from the August
2023 Open Houses. The Coalition provided comments on the Riverfront’s assets, opportunities, and challenges.

COMMUNITY COALITION MEETING #2 | October 23, 2023
The Coalition reviewed existing conditions information, including initial cultural resources, biological resources, mobility, parking, circulation, and economic trends. The Coalition provided feedback on emerging common vision
elements and key long-term desires for the Riverfront area.

COMMUNITY COALITION MEETING #3 | November 6, 2023
The Coalition reviewed a draft Riverfront Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (diagram and document). The Coalition provided feedback to help refine the draft Vision and Guiding Principles Framework.

COMMUNITY COALITION MEETING #4 | November 20, 2023
The Coalition reviewed an updated draft Riverfront Vision and Guiding Principles Framework. The Coalition provided feedback to help further refine the draft Vision and Guiding Principles Framework, so it is ready for City Council review. 14 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific The community's Vision for the future of the Redding
Riverfront is the key foundational piece for the Specific Plan process. It represents the overarching aspirational framework for how the community would like to see the area change, improve, and be enhanced in the future. While the final content of the Specific Plan is not known currently, it is envisioned to include a combination of land use policies, development standards and requirements, cultural enhancement and preservation projects, and environmental protection policies and requirements. As the City and community move through the Specific Plan process, all planning concepts, ideas, designs, policies, and programs considered for inclusion in the plan must be consistent with the Vision and Guiding Principles outlined in this document.

The following section presents the emerging Vision and Guiding Principles that were developed based on community ideas and refined by the Community Coalition.

PART IV

VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES
15 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Vision Elements
Seven Vision Elements (shown on the
diagram on the following page) build
on the key assets in the Riverfront area
and address the major challenges and
opportunities facing both the City and the
community. Each of them are intentionally
aspirational — identifying partnerships,
processes, activities, and changes that
will ensure the Riverfront area remains a
focal point for the community and visitors,
with a range of activities and uses, while
also advancing environmental protection,
habitat enhancement, and public access
and amenities.

Guiding Principles
Each Vision Element is further supported
by a series of specific Guiding Principles
that identify measurable objectives and
outcomes. These principles provide a
framework or roadmap for evaluating
concepts, designs, and ideas that are
generated during the Specific Plan
process. All components of the Specific
Plan, including regulations and funding
mechanisms, must be consistent with
the Guiding Principles. Furthermore, the
Guiding Principles work in parallel with
one another, and no principle is more or
less important than the other.
16 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Redding
Riverfront
Vision
Elements
A
A Healthy
and Resilient
Natural
Environment
B
Respecting the
Indigenous
Community:

Past, Present, and
Future
C
Environmentally
Sensitive and
Economically
Viable Arts,
Cultural, and
Entertainment
Venues
D
Appropriate Scale
and Uses
E
World-Class
Recreation and
Activities
F
Connected
Spaces
G
Memorable and
Vibrant Places
17 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT A

A HEALTHY AND RESILIENT

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
A.1 Celebrate the immense natural
beauty of the Sacramento River and
Redding Riverfront area.

A.2 Protect and identify opportunities
to restore sensitive natural
communities that support
biodiversity to ensure the long-term
health of the Sacramento River
ecosystem.

A.3 Create opportunities for native
fish, animals, and birds to thrive
throughout their entire life cycles.

A.4 Require development and activities
near the Sacramento River and/
or critical habitat areas to be
compatible, complimentary, and low
(or no) impact.

A.5 Mitigate noise and light impacts on
sensitive natural communities.

A.6 Identify opportunities to create more
public open space to support the
“re-wilding” of the Riverfront area.

A.7 Comply with all Federal, State, and
local statutory and regulatory
requirements for the Riverfront area.

18 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT B
RESPECTING THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY:

PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
B.1 Honor the deep Indigenous cultural
connections to the Redding
Riverfront area.

B.2 Engage the Indigenous community
and include them in land use, habitat
protection, recreation, and cultural
landscapes discussions and decisions.

B.3 Protect Indigenous sacred sites and
cultural resources.

B.4 Maintain Indigenous connections and
access to land, river, and animals.

B.5 Explore opportunities and
partnerships with the Indigenous
community for creating an
Indigenous-owned and -operated
cultural center and other spaces.

19 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT C

ECONOMICALLY VIABLE AND THRIVING ARTS,

CULTURAL, AND ENTERTAINMENT VENUES
C.1 Allow for a range of activities,
events, economic drivers, and
programs through multi-faceted,
flexible facilities, so Redding remains
the center for arts, culture, and
entertainment for the region.

C.2 Support the viability and success
of historical uses and arts, cultural,
sports, and entertainment events and
venues in the area that are a key part
of the unique history and identity of
Redding.

C.3 Ensure that new venues and
destinations are scaled and
programmed to address local and
visitor desires while also being
economically viable.

C.4 Ensure that new venues, activities,
and destinations are designed in
such a way that they are efficient to
maintain and operate, supporting
their long-term financial success.

C.5 Collaborate with Cultural District
partners to enhance public art,
cultural, and entertainment elements
so the Riverfront is a highlight of the
designated Redding Cultural District.
20 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT D

APPROPRIATE SCALE AND USES
D.1 Require new buildings and uses to
reflect the scale and character of
Redding.

D.2 Design community destinations that
are safe, well-lit, easy to access, and
ADA accessible.

D.3 Maintain the personality and
character of the existing
surrounding neighborhoods and
identify opportunities to increase
neighborhood-focused amenities.

D.4 For the Northern Riverfront:
» Create vibrant and active public
uses that support locals and
visitors.
» Identify ways to maintain or reduce
developed site coverage.

D.5 For the Southern Riverfront:
» Consider opportunities to
support local housing needs.
» Consider how development on
Park Marina Drive will impact
existing and future circulation to
reduce congestion.
» Create opportunities for public
recreation and amenities on/next
to the quarry ponds.
» Consider additional commercial,
restaurants, and mixed-use
projects along Park Marina
Drive that are compatible with
surrounding neighborhoods.
21 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT E

WORLD-CLASS RECREATION AND ACTIVITIES
E.1 Provide additional opportunities for
boating, fishing, kayaking, and other
on-the-water activities.

E.2 Promote aquatic activities in areas
that are accessible and safe (e.g.,
calm water, warmer temperatures,
away from boating activities).

E.3 Promote outdoor activities and
connections to nature that support
health and wellbeing.

E.4 Leverage the Redding Riverfront
as a “base camp” for outdoor
enthusiasts visiting the region’s
outdoor destinations.

E.5 Focus low-impact activities within
public areas and sensitive habitats
(Northern Riverfront, Sacramento
River) and more intense activities
within private outdoor spaces and
quarry ponds.

22 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT F

CONNECTED SPACES
F.1 Expand opportunities for people to
connect with natural areas and the
Sacramento River.

F.2 Enhance vehicle, transit, bicycle,
and pedestrian connections from
existing neighborhoods to the area,
and between major destinations
within the area.

F.3 Identify ways to reconnect the
Northern and Southern Riverfronts
to each other and to Downtown.

F.4 Identify parking locations, types, and
management strategies to ensure
that current and future uses and
activities have adequate (but not
excessive) parking.

F.5 Require new uses and spaces to be
fully ADA accessible; expand ADA
accessibility to and within existing
uses and neighborhoods.
23 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

VISION ELEMENT G

MEMORABLE AND VIBRANT PLACES
G.1 Make the Redding Riverfront safe,
visible, welcoming, and walkable.

G.2 Consider community gathering
spaces for the community to share,
including community gardens, dog
parks and pocket parks, outdoor
music venues, and public art.

G.3 Create development regulations,
design guidelines, and
implementation strategies that are
tailored to the Redding Riverfront.

G.4 Identify and address any constraints
imposed by the State of California
2019 Surplus Lands Act.

G.5 Leverage the Specific Plan and
community process to: » Analyze the economic feasibility of a range of private projects (new
development, recreation).
» Identify public investment costs
and grant funding opportunities
(ecosystem restoration,
open space enhancements,
infrastructure, recreation).

G.6 Identify opportunities for new public
infrastructure and operations
funding mechanisms, such as
Business Improvement Districts
(BID), Community Facilities District
(CFD), or Tax Increment Financing
District (TIFD).
24 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific The Vision and Guiding Principles outlined in this report are just the starting point for the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan process. This document represents the culmination of Phase 1 of the project. There will be many opportunities for community discussions throughout the course of the two-year project.

PHASE 1
Project Kick-off and Visioning
June 2023 — January 2024
PHASE 2
Analysis and Opportunities
October 2023 — March 2024
PHASE 3
Plan Concepts Development
April 2024 — June 2024
PHASE 4
Specific Plan Development and CEQA
June 2024 — June 2025
PART V

NEXT STEPS
25 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific How the Community
Can Stay Involved
The City is committed to designing and
implementing an inclusive and dynamic
community engagement process to
ensure the Redding Riverfront Specific
Plan project is based on robust and
genuine feedback from the entire
community, including civic and city
leaders, the Indigenous community,
property and business owners, current
tenants and lease holders, topical interest
organizations (e.g., mobility advocates,
environmental groups), tourism and
economic development groups, and
residents. As such, the development of
the specific plan will require inclusive
engagement during each project phase.

The community is encouraged to visit
the project website to stay up-todate on meetings, workshops, draft materials, reports and analysis, and other
components of the project. The website
is the community's resource page for all
items related to the Riverfront area. While
on the website, you can add your email
26 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific www.ReddingRiverfront.org
to receive periodic email blasts and other
project updates. There is also an area to
share comments about the Riverfront area
or the process. Scan the QR code below
to visit the project website.
27 Redding Riverfront Specific Plan | Vision and Guiding Principles Framework Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific

REDDING RIVERFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN

VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES FRAMEWORK
Please visit the project website for additional project information, including Open House and Community Coalition meeting presentations and materials:
www.reddingriverfront.org
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Vision and Guiding Principles Framework (January 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding Riverfront Specific Community Discussions #2: Opportunities and Alternatives

COMBINED ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY

REDDING RIVERFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN
Community Workshop #1: June 13, 2024
Community Workshop #2: June 15, 2024
Online Community Survey: August 8 through September 3, 2024 Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 2 CONTENTS
PART 1

OVERVIEW
 Background
 Engagement Structure
PART 2

COMBINED SUMMARY

OF MAJOR THEMES
 Overview
 Land Use Concepts
 Priority Locations for the Uses or Activities
 Key Challenges
PART 3

DETAILED RESULTS
 Combined Polling Results
 Workshop Small Group Exercises
 Workshop Comment Cards
 Online Comments
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 3 PART 1

OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 4 PROJECT BACKGROUND
In April 2023, the Redding City Council began a
community-led process to update the Redding
Riverfront Specific Plan. The purpose of this project is to reintroduce the city and community to the river by
creating a long-term vision for 380 acres of public
and private land and water along the Sacramento
River.

In Summer 2024, the City held the second round of
community engagement events and activities focused
on emerging Opportunities and Challenges. The
engagement included discussions on ways the Vision
and Guiding Principles Framework (approved by the
Redding City Council in January 2024) could be
applied in the Riverfront through environmental
preservation/enhancement, appropriate land uses,
recreational activities, and other strategies.

Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 5 The Project Team hosted two in-person Community
Workshops (June 13 and 15, 2024) and an online
Community Survey (available August to September
2024) to present emerging opportunities and
alternatives for the Northern and Southern Riverfront
areas and solicit community feedback and ideas.

Approximately 130 people attended the community
workshops and 900 people participated in the online
survey.

OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 6 OVERVIEW: COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS
The Community Workshops included four major agenda items.

Welcome and
Introduction
Background
Presentations
Large Group
Polling
Small Group
Breakout Session
Attendees provided their
contact details via sign-in
sheets.

Comment Cards were
provided to each
participant to gather
individual comments.

The Vision and Guiding
Principles Framework was
handed out to participants
for reference.

The Project Team gave a
presentation to update
participants with relevant
project information,
including schedule, major
findings from the Existing
Conditions analysis,
emerging ideas from the
Community Coalition
Process.

This included an overview
of the Vision and Guiding
Principles Framework.

The Project Team led
participants through an
interactive polling
exercise that allowed them
to provide quick reactions
to initial land use and
activity ideas.

The poll also provided an
opportunity to discuss
concepts prior to the Small
Group Breakout session.

Participants broke into
small groups to discuss
and identify priority areas
(Northern Riverfront and
Southern Riverfront) for
their preferred planning
ideas and land uses.

Each group had a large
map and a series of icon
chips and stickers. They
placed items on their map
to corresponded with their
preferences (types of uses
and location) for various
concepts.

Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 7 OVERVIEW: COMMUNITY SURVEY
The Project Team also developed an interactive online
Community Survey that replicated the concepts and
format of the Community Workshops. This provided
an additional opportunity for the community to
provide feedback and ideas on the emerging
concepts.

Survey participants provided reactions to each
concept initially discussed during the Community
Discussions workshops. Additionally, they were asked
to place uses by dropping icon pins on a digital map in the location they though it was most appropriate.

Participants had the ability to add as many or as few
concepts as they liked to their map.

Approximately 900 people participated in the online
Community Survey.

Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 8 PART 2

COMBINED SUMMARY OF MAJOR THEMES
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 9 The following is a combined summary of the major
themes and findings from both the Community
Workshops and the Community Survey. The summary
is organized into the following sections:  Land Use Concepts This section summarizes the top priority uses from
each category, according to participants.
 Priority Locations for Uses or Activities
This section provides information on the
participants’ preferred locations for each land use
opportunity.
 Key Challenges
This section highlights the challenges identified
by the community of the different land use
opportunities.

OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 10 LAND USE CONCEPTS
Natural and Cultural Spaces
 Protect and restore the sensitive natural
environment to improve land and water areas that
serve as habitat spaces for different animals and
fish to thrive.
 Protect habitat, resources, buildings, and
properties from flooding impacts.
 Preserve sites with deep cultural significance and
increase awareness of Indigenous culture through
dedicated learning and education areas, which
could be owned and/or run by the Indigenous
community.

Outdoor Activities
 Focus on increasing opportunities for outdoor
recreation activities that are compatible and
complimentary to Redding’s riverfront context and
leave little (or no) impact on the environment.
 Strategically increase community access to the
Sacramento River and other natural areas within the
project area through elevated, low-impact viewing
platforms.
 Ensure that the planned outdoor activities are
inclusive and accessible by people of all ages and
abilities like designated spaces for fishing activity
near the river.
 Provide activities and facilities that cater to both the local community and visitors.

Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 11 LAND USE CONCEPTS
Buildings and Uses
 Increase opportunities to access and interact with the Sacramento River by creating experiences like
riverfront dining and some retail storefronts.
 Ensure that the materials used are context-sensitive
and enhance the personality of the riverfront.
 Focus on developing new building design guidelines
that reflect the existing scale and character of
Redding.
 Upgrade existing indoor and outdoor event venues
with strategically identified enhancements, to
improve their efficiency and all-year round usage.
 Increase public amenities like community gathering
spaces, outdoor event venues and multi-purpose
facilities to benefit the local community and visitors.  Preserve native flora and fauna by considering the
possibility of a botanical garden.

Mobility
 Improve and increase connectivity between the
Northern and Southern Riverfront areas across
Highway 44.
 Prioritize pedestrian and bike safety by providing
additional street infrastructure like separated bike
paths and safe crosswalks along Park Marina Drive
and river crossings.
 Provide adequate parking infrastructure that is low
impact with green spaces, trees and other green
strategies.
 Better design and manage parking within the
Northern Riverfront.

Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 12 PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR USES AND ACTIVITIES
Northern Riverfront Area
 Restore the natural habitat by preserving both flora and fauna through wetland and fish habitat restoration.

Provide designated spaces for fishing activity.
 Upgrade the existing Civic Auditorium and Rodeo facility by retrofitting or re-configuring their spaces.

Strategically plan year-round events and programming to encourage the space to function as one integrated multi-functional space for the community.
 Create a new multi-use event space that becomes a regional event destination that serves the local community and visitors/tourists such as an outdoor music venue or community gathering space.  Provide spaces that protect Indigenous culture, transition, and practices.  Increase bicycle and pedestrian access and improve vehicular circulation between the different facilities in the Northern Riverfront and across to the Southern Riverfront. Strategically increase access to natural areas through sensitive low impact recreation.
 Identify nature-based solutions to protect the Riverfront Area from flooding impacts.  Provide low-impact parking for the different event spaces that require vehicle access.

Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 13 PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR USES AND ACTIVITIES
Southern Riverfront Area
 Explore ways to increase public access to the Sacramento River’s edge in the Southern Riverfront.  Provide riverfront dining and river-facing retail to allow greater connections with the Sacramento River.  Allow low-impact water recreation activities to give people access, and new ways to interact with the Sacramento River. These could include fishing, kayaking, a riverfront bike path or a strategically designed boardwalk.  Increase multi-modal access along Park Marina Drive by providing additional street infrastructure like complete bike lanes, sidewalks, and safe crosswalks that also help reduce vehicular speed improving the riverfront experience.  Consider limited housing and mixed-use projects that included lower heights and natural building materials.

Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 14 KEY CHALLENGES
 Balancing between low- and high-intensity spaces for gathering and recreation. Providing high-volume and high-intensity uses like the large event spaces and a hotel while simultaneously preserving, protecting and enhancing the natural habitat for the native flora and fauna which limits recreational access in the northern riverfront area.
 Increasing the viability of the Civic Auditorium and Rodeo Facility. Developing a strategic events and programming matrix to ensure that the two facilities support and function as an extension of the other, rather than existing in isolation from each other.
 Creating an Indigenous space. Creating space(s) for an Indigenous cultural area within, but at the same time separated/secluded from, high-intensity uses in the Northern Riverfront.  Removing connectivity barriers between the Northern and Southern Riverfront. Finding ways to increase access and interaction with the river and connectivity across Highway 44, which currently is a barrier between the Northern and Southern Riverfronts.
 Increasing public access to the river’s edge in the Southern Riverfront. Exploring opportunities for purely public or public-private access and ownership within the Southern riverfront which gives people a sense of their proximity to and enjoyment of the Sacramento River.
 Reducing flooding impacts. Designating suitable uses and designing naturalized spaces that hold water, reduce flood impacts, and ensure that any new development is resilient to occasional inundation likely based on its location in and near the 100-year floodplain. Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 15 PART 3

DETAILED RESULTS
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 16 The Community Workshops and Community Survey
included the same polling exercise. Participants were
asked to react to various planning concepts grouped
under the following categories:

Participants were asked to react to each idea by
choosing one of the following options:  I really like it  It is worth considering  I don’t like it  I’m not sure The following is a combined summary of all the results
from the two workshops and online survey. It includes
both the polling and a “heat map” for where
participants felt that use(s) is most appropriate.

DETAILED RESULTS
Natural and
Cultural
Spaces
Outdoor
Activities
Buildings
and Uses Mobility
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 17 COMBINED POLLING RESULTS

NATURAL AND CULTURAL SPACES
723
540
72 115 97
43 2 5
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
I really like it Worth
considering
I don’t like it I am not sure

FISH HABITAT RESTORATION
Participants desired fish habitat restoration being focused along the Sacramento River and within flooding areas and ponds in the Northern and Southern Riverfronts.

Online survey results are in dark green and workshop results are in light green on the chart.

The map depicts the concentration of participants choices for the most appropriate locations for each use. Participants were allowed to provide multiple locations. Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 18 409
563
195
127
42 58
12 5
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
I really like it Worth
considering
I don’t like it I am not sure

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

COMBINED POLLING RESULTS

NATURAL AND CULTURAL SPACES
Participants suggested exploring floodplain management strategies to reduce flood impacts and damage to natural areas at key habitat areas (Northern Riverfront) and on properties along Park Marina Drive (Southern Riverfront).

Online survey results are in dark green and workshop results are in light green on the chart.

The map depicts the concentration of participants choices for the most appropriate locations for each use. Participants were allowed to provide multiple locations. Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 19 596
366
182
112 61 36 6 16
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
I really like it Worth
considering
I don’t like it I am not sure

PROTECTED SACRED SITES AND SPACES

COMBINED POLLING RESULTS

NATURAL AND CULTURAL SPACES
Participants desired to have protected historic and cultural sites and spaces integrated with, or connected to, public areas in the Northern Riverfront. There were several comments to work with local Indigenous tribes to identify the most appropriate area(s) for these spaces.

Online survey results are in dark green and workshop results are in light green on the chart.

The map depicts the concentration of participants choices for the most appropriate locations for each use. Participants were allowed to provide multiple locations. Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 20 485
423
209
97 62 41 11 8
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
I really like it Worth
considering
I don’t like it I am not sure

INDIGENOUS EDUCATION AND LEARNING SPACES

COMBINED POLLING RESULTS

NATURAL AND CULTURAL SPACES
Participants desired to have Indigenous education and learning areas that are integrated with, or connected to, existing public uses in the Northern Riverfront. There were several comments to work with local Indigenous tribes to identify the most appropriate area(s) for these spaces.

Online survey results are in dark green and workshop results are in light green on the chart.

NATURAL AND CULTURAL SPACES
418 427
234
123
57 43 17 8
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
I really like it Worth
considering
I don’t like it I am not sure

INDIGENOUS-RUN CULTURAL CENTERS/SPACES
Participants desired to have outdoor or indoor spaces that are centers of Indigenous culture, led and managed by Indigenous people, integrated with or connected to existing similar cultural facilities in the Northern Riverfront. There were several comments to work with local Indigenous tribes to identify the most appropriate area(s) for these spaces.

Online survey results are in dark green and workshop results are in light green on the chart.

The map depicts the concentration of participants choices for the most appropriate locations for each use. Participants were allowed to provide multiple locations. Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Community Discussions #2 Summary (Summer 2024) (9.4(a)--Redding 22 COMBINED POLLING RESULTS
558
421
174
64 66 36 13 8
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
I really like it Worth
considering
I don’t like it I am not sure

DEDICATED FISHING AREAS

OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES
Participants preferred to have dedicated fishing areas along the Sacramento River in the Northern and Southern Riverfronts, especially near areas of where fish spawn (shallows, gravel, etc.).