Agenda Packet — Redding City Council, June 3, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (doors will open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA
June 3, 2025
6:00 PM
This meeting will include teleconference participation by Council Member Tenessa Audette (Government Code Section 54953). In addition to the meeting location above, members of the public may participate in the meeting from the following teleconference location:

Marriott Courtyard Lobby
15433 Ventura Boulevard
Sherman Oaks, California, 91403

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR JACK MUNNS
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Lori Moretti, Redding Police and Redding Fire Department's Chaplain C. Roll Call

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please enter your name in the electronic kiosk located in the lobby before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted their name through the electronic kiosk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please enter your name in the electronic kiosk located in the lobby. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.gov or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council June 3, 2025

Page 2 ends

4(c). Adopt Ordinance No. 2677, an uncodified ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, adopting a policy to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements for military equipment pursuant to Government Code Section 7071.

4.1(a). Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Accept update regarding the proclamation declaring a local emergency due to flooding and, pursuant to Public Contract Code 20168 and 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency; and
(2) Find that the South Bonnyview Storm Drain Project and the Parkview Sewer Siphon Repair Project are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

4.1(b). Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply, accept, appropriate, and implement the United States Economic Development Administration’s Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 for infrastructure improvements located in the City of Redding Stillwater Business Park; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to identify and commit an equal match from Stillwater Business Park property sales.

4.2(b). Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to issue a loan between the City of Redding’s Risk Management Reserve and the Airports Division’s Enterprise Fund in order to fund the Redding Regional Airport Passenger Terminal Parking Lot Reconstruction Project in an amount not-to-exceed $1.5 million – the loan will be amortized annually over a 10-year term at the averaged pooled cash rate with annual payments of $132,670, and a projected balloon payment in the amount of $500,000.

4.2(c). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Good News Rescue Mission’s Day Resource Center:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Provider Operational Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission; (2) Find that entering into a Provider Operational Agreement is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, the actual construction of the project was previously reviewed for California Environmental Quality Act compliance; and
(3) Find that entering into a Provider Operational Agreement is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act under Title 24 CFR

58.34(a)(3).

Redding City Council June 3, 2025

Page 3 ends

4.5(a). Authorize and approve the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5584 – System Hardening Equipment for the City of Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Award Bid 5584 to OneSource Supply Solutions for an annual evaluated price of $208,450.05;
(2) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the bid award annually with OneSource Supply Solutions through March 31, 2028, if mutually agreeable, with all prices, terms and conditions remaining the same; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve an additional $83,000 per fiscal year as a contingency to account for unforeseen cost escalations including, but not limited to, tariffs and global supply chain disruptions.

4.6(a). Adopt Resolution revising City Council Policy No. 806 (Recreation Classes and Program Fees), to include increased cost recovery and an additional 15 percent administrative fee, as recommended by the Community Services Advisory Commission at its regular meeting held on May 14, 2025.

4.11(a). Authorize and approve the following relative to the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Accept update regarding the Project; and
(2) Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

4.11(b). Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 (Job No. 2712), Replace Asphalt Concrete (AC) Surfacing 2024 Project, awarded to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,115,664.48.

4.11(c). Authorize staff to reject all bids in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 20166 and Public Contract Code Section 22038 regarding Bid Negotiation No. 5469, Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project.

4.11(d). Authorize and approve the following relative to the funding of the City of Redding Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the State Water Resources Control Board Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program from $40 million to $50 million; (2) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act Loan Program from $25 million to $40 million; and
(3) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) from $6 million to $8 million.

Redding City Council June 3, 2025

Page 4 ends

4.11(e). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333):
(1) Adopt Resolution summarily vacating Public Service Easement “B” within Parcel 4 of Parcel Map (PM-2016-00771) as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B;
(2) Find the action consistent with the General Plan; and (3) Find the action categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15035 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations.

4.11(f). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) - Schedule No. 5577 - Construction Inspection Services and Material Testing Services for the Eastside Road Bridge Over Olney Creek Project (Project):
(1) Award RFP to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $886,111.38 with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., to provide Construction Inspection and Material Testing Services for the Project; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract amendments not-toexceed $50,000.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE, AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A court challenge to action taken by the City Council on any project or decision may be limited to only those issues raised during the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council during, or prior to, the public hearing.

Development Services

6.1. Public Hearing to consider Rezoning Application (RZ-2025-00477), by the City of Redding (City); and Ordinance amending the City's Zoning Ordinance regarding the short-term rental requirements.

Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing, and upon conclusion, authorize and approve the following:
(1) Offer Ordinance, as further described in Option A (Planning Commission’s recommended changes), amending Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 18, (Zoning), Chapter 18.43, (Standards for Specific Land Uses) by amending RMC Section 18.43.180 (Short-Term Rentals), for first reading by title only, waive the first reading;
(2) Direct the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find that adoption of the ordinance is exempt from environmental review, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378, because the passage of the proposed ordinance is not a project according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Redding City Council June 3, 2025

Page 5 ends

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Assistant City Manager

9.2(d). Consider Disposition and Financing Agreement with FaithWorks Community Coalition, Inc.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following proposed actions related to the sale of Cityowned real property located at 815 Parkview Avenue (Assessor Parcel No. 104-350- 019), 825 Parkview Avenue (Assessor Parcel No. 104-350-018), and 2520 Leland Avenue (Assessor Parcel No. 104-350-020) to FaithWorks Community Coalition, Inc.:
(1) Conditioned upon the approval of the Disposition and Financing Agreement (DFA) by the City Attorney, authorize the Mayor to execute the DFA with FaithWorks Community Coalition, Inc. for the transfer and development of the above-referenced parcels;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the transaction, including but not limited to: (a) a seller carryback loan in the amount of $153,000 at one percent for a 55-year term for the acquisition of the parcels; and (b) a development loan not to exceed $1,600,000 at one percent for a 55-year term to support the construction of a 14-unit, mixed-income, mixed-use development;
(3) Find that the aforementioned actions such as allocating funding are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15312-Surplus Government Property Sales) and 15061(b)(3)–Common Sense Exemption; and
(4) Find that administrative and management activities, such as allocating funding, are exempt under 24 CFR §58.34(a)(3) administrative and management activities under the National Environmental Policy Act. The construction of the project has been reviewed for environmental compliance and an Authority to Use Grant Funds has already been received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

9.2(e). Consider development and implementation of an Entertainment Zone in the City of Redding.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Accept report; and
(2) Provide direction to staff regarding the development and implementation of an ordinance allowing an Entertainment Zone in the City of Redding pursuant to Senate Bill 969.

Redding City Council June 3, 2025

Page 6 ends

Electric Utility

9.5(b). Consider Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Recommendation:

Accept the City of Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 Third Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Community Services

9.6(b). Consider Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.56 (Community Services Department).

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Offer an Ordinance amending RMC Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.56 (Community Services Department) by amending RMC Sections

2.56.010 (Definitions), 2.56.060 (Approval for use of sound amplification equipment), 2.56.070 (Concessions), and 2.56.080 (Smoking), all relating to the Community Services Department, for first reading by title only and waive the full reading;
(2) Authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish the ordinance in accordance with law; and
(3) Find that the action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Redding City Council June 3, 2025

Page 7 ends

Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: https://www.shastaartscouncil.org/scactv; and the City’s YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/cityofredding. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the Services tab, and select City Council Videos.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Ordinance No. 2677, an uncodified ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, adopting a policy to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements for military equipment pursuant to Government Code Section 7071.

Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2677
^Ordinance No. 2677 Attachment-Military Equipment Policy 707 MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No. 2677, adopting a policy to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements for military equipment.

Brian Barner, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 8
First reading done: 05/20/2025 BB
For adoption on: 06/03/2025 5-0
CC agenda item # 4(c)
ORDINANCE NO. 2677

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING A POLICY TO PROVIDE

GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL, ACQUISITION, AND

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, which relates to the use of military equipment by state and local law enforcement agencies; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481, codified at Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, inclusive, and as applied to cities, requires local law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of a military equipment use policy prior to taking any action which supports the acquisition and use of military equipment; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 7071 requires approval of a military equipment use policy by ordinance at a regular meeting of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 7071 further provides that the military equipment use policy must be made publicly available on the law enforcement agency’s internet website for no less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to adoption of the same by ordinance; and WHEREAS, subdivision (e) of Government Code section 7071 further requires that the City Council review for renewal any such ordinance at least annually with consideration of the annual military equipment report submitted pursuant to Government Code section 7072; and WHEREAS, Redding Police Department Policy 707 was published on the Redding Police Department’s public website on March 2, 2022, and was provided to the City Council on the same day; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2647 on May 3, 2022, whereby Redding Policy Department Policy was approved, adopted and found to meet all requirements under the law; and
WHEREAS, Redding Police Department Policy 707 was revised to reflect current legislative changes, published on the Redding Police Department’s public website on May 7, 2025, and provided to City Council on May 20, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the current proposed military equipment use policy for the Redding Police Department 707 is attached and incorporated herein;

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment) Section 1. Determinations and Orders.

1. Redding Police Department Policy 707 meets the requirements of subdivision (d) of Government Code section 7071 because substantial evidence in the record establishes that:

A. Policy 707 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and B. Policy 707 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights and civil liberties; and
C. The equipment set forth in Policy 707 is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civil safety.

2. The current version of Redding Police Department Policy 707, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is approved and adopted.

3. The Chief of Police shall produce the annual military equipment report required by Government Code section 7072, publish the same on the Redding Police Department internet website, and provide the notice and public engagement required by subdivision (b) of Government Code 7072.

4. The Chief of Police shall, after undertaking all actions set forth in Section 3, herein, agendize consideration of the annual military equipment report for a regular meeting of the City Council.

5. The Chief of Police shall, no later than ten months (10) months after the adoption of this Ordinance, and every subsequent renewal of the same, cause consideration of an ordinance to renew this Ordinance for an additional term of one (1) year to be agendized for first reading.

Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection subdivision paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections subdivisions paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 3. The City of Redding finds that this Ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061(b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment), the adoption of this Ordinance is therefore not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 20th day of May, 2025, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney
DATE ATTESTED_________ , 2025
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment) Policy
707
Redding Police Department
RPD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/05/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Redding Police Department
Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
707.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
707.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• Area denial electroshock devices, microwave weapons, water cannons, long-range acoustic devices (LRADs), acoustic hailing devices, and sound cannons. • Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 Attachment-Military Equipment Policy 707 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment) Redding Police Department
RPD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/05/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Redding Police Department
Military Equipment - 2
707.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Redding Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 707.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Redding Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
707.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
Armored Vehicle
Mobile Command Vehicle
Explosive Breaching
.50 Caliber Rifle
Rifles identified as assault weapons under Penal Code Sections 30510 and 30515 Noise Flash Diversionary Devices
Tear Gas and Munitions
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 Attachment-Military Equipment Policy 707 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment) Redding Police Department
RPD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/05/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Redding Police Department
Military Equipment - 3
Kinetic Energy Weapons and Munitions
For the most recent inventory report, see the Redding Police Department website at https://cityofredding.gov/government/departments/police/policies___reference_library/ assembly_bill_481.php
707.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 707.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by any member of this Department shall be approved for use and in accordance with this Department policy. Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this Department, or otherwise engaged in law enforcement operations in this jurisdiction, shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies in rendering mutual aid.
707.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 Attachment-Military Equipment Policy 707 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment) Redding Police Department
RPD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/05/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Redding Police Department
Military Equipment - 4
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 707.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2677 Attachment-Military Equipment Policy 707 (4(c)--Adopt Uncodified Ordinance No.2677 - Military Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Accept update regarding the proclamation declaring a local emergency due to flooding and, pursuant to Public Contract Code 20168 and 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency; and (2) Find that the South Bonnyview Storm Drain Project and the Parkview Sewer Siphon Repair Project are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding (City), to date, has not been notified of any potential emergency aid funding from the state or federal authorities. Below is a table of identified emergency repair locations/projects with estimated costs and current funding sources.

Location/Project Contractor Estimated Costs1 Funding Source3 South Bonnyview Storm Drain J.F Shea $3,750,000 Wastewater Utility2 Parkview Sewer Siphon M5 $1,000,000 Wastewater Utility
Various Location - Parks TBD $625,5254 Unidentified
Notes:

1. Estimated costs include construction contract, contingency, environmental, design and construction management.

2. As City Council (Council) approved, Wastewater Utility will loan the Storm Drain utility the funds for the South Bonnyview Storm Drain Project. The loan will be paid annually, every June 30th and will be amortized annually over a 20-year term at the average pooled cash rate calculated at the time of payment.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.1(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding Jason Gibilisco, Management
Assistant to the City Manager
Packet Pg. 16
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding Page 2

3. If any state/federal funding is received for the respective project the reimbursed amount shall be due and payable immediately to the various funding sources.

4. Parks costs are conservative and assume meeting emergency aid funding requirements.

These costs may be significantly reduced if completed by City crews.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to confirm that conditions of a local emergency continue to exist.

Under Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(1) the local emergency can only be terminated by a four-fifths vote of the Council. To that end, the Council’s prior determination of a local emergency will remain unless an affirmative vote of the Council is made to terminate the local emergency.

Background/Analysis
On February 2, 2025, a storm event occurred in the City, ultimately causing conditions beyond the immediate control of local resources, services, personnel, equipment, and facilities. These winter storms brought heavy rain to all areas of Shasta County which in turn caused a significant increase in releases from Shasta Dam resulting in localized flooding, water rescues, and damage to roadways, trail systems, storm water systems, and other infrastructure.

Due to these events and weather conditions, a local emergency was proclaimed on February 11, 2025, and on February 18, 2025, the Council ratified this proclamation and will continue the declaration until such time that the threat of these storms has subsided, there is no longer an elevated risk to life and property, and the emergency restoration of facilities has been completed.

The local emergency was declared by the City Manager serving in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services under RMC 9.12.030. The Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services is attached.

The South Bonnyview Boat Launch access road remains closed due to the failed culvert. Staff has constructed a temporary access road for the boat launch and it is now open for public use.

Staff estimates that approximately 200 feet of the overall 700-foot-long, 10-foot diameter culvert has failed and other pipe sections have been compromised. Staff and J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. (J.F. Shea) have completed the additional exploratory efforts and staff has finalized the details of the design for the South Bonnyview Storm Drain Project. Staff has also obtained the necessary access from private property owners to facilitate the repairs. J.F. Shea has begun installation of the new headwall structure on the north end of the culvert and will begin demolition of the failed section of culvert piping upon completion of the headwall. Piping materials have been ordered and are anticipated to arrive in late June 2025 at which time the culvert rehabilitation work will begin.

Nur Pon Open Space remains closed. The flood waters damaged the bridges, kayak boat launch area, and trails. Parks staff performed some repairs to the open space focusing on the first walking bridge closest to the parking area, the bathrooms, the parking lot facility, and the kayak boat launch area of the park. Staff began preliminary work to import repair materials and repair bridge abutments. Staff also reset a bridge deck that was knocked off its abutments in the flood.

The majority of the walking loop will remain closed until the appropriate fix can be identified by Public Works’ Engineering Division and Parks Division staff and the work is completed. The Packet Pg. 17
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding Page 3 Parks Division worked with the Engineering Division to identify the appropriate repair strategies and install delineators to limit public access to damaged areas along the Sacramento River Trail in Caldwell Park. The Parks Division is working on gathering the required materials to complete the repairs in this location.

The Parkview Sewer Siphon located within the Linden Creek channel was also affected by the rain events and flood waters resulting in a landslide that exposed the existing sewer siphon just west of Parkview Avenue. Currently, the sewer siphon remains operational but the stream embankments must be repaired and stabilized to ensure the situation does not worsen. Staff has completed a design for the soil stabilization repairs and is currently working to obtain the necessary permits from the associated resources agencies. Additionally, staff has solicited M5 Excavation (M5) for the embankment repairs within the channel based on their technical knowledge of slope stabilization and previous performance on projects of similar size and scope.

Staff is currently negotiating a contract with M5 and anticipates beginning construction in early to mid-June 2025.

The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) has requested estimates for damages to both private and public sites. Staff has met with CalOES and has sent them information on the damage and associated costs. The current damage is estimated to be $7.15 million. This cost could go up as staff continues to monitor and identify damaged areas to determine the level of repair necessary.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that the South Bonnyview Storm Drain Project and the Parkview Sewer Siphon Repair Project are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Section 15269(b) includes emergency repairs to publicly and privately-owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. The emergency repair and replacement will occur in areas of previous disturbance, and the repairs are necessary to maintain service essential to public health.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding” Attachments
Previous Staff Report - 021825 Declaring local emergency Resolution No. 2025-011 - Declare Local Emergency with Proclamation NOE Parkview Sewer Siphon ER
NOE S. Bonnyview Storm Drain ER
Packet Pg. 18

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution by a four-fifths vote to confirm and ratify the Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services declaring a local emergency and authorizing the City Manager to repair or replace public facilities and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without solicitation of competitive bids in accordance with Public Contract Code 20168 and 22050.

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the resolution could have a positive fiscal impact of an indeterminate amount as it will facilitate the recovery of the community and the receipt of emergency aid from state, and possibly federal, authorities if it becomes available.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to adopt the resolution or provide alternate direction. Failure to adopt the resolution will result in a legal finding that the local emergency has ceased and will likely negatively impact the receipt of aid from state and/or federal authorities, and the City of Redding’s (City) ability to immediately repair or replace damaged infrastructure.

Background/Analysis
On February 2, 2025, a storm event arrived in the City of Redding, ultimately causing conditions to be beyond the immediate control of local resources, services, personnel, equipment, and facilities. These winter storms have brought heavy rain to all areas of Shasta County which in turn have caused a significant increase in releases from Shasta Dam resulting in localized flooding, water rescues, and damage to roadways, trail systems, storm water systems, and other infrastructure. At this time, continued high-water flows are expected with not all areas having MEETING DATE: February 18, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider Resolution to confirm and ratify the City of Redding Proclamation declaring a local emergency due to flooding.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 254 Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 021825 Declaring local emergency (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding) Report to Redding City Council February 12, 2025
Re: 9.1(b)--Adopt Resolution to Confirm and Ratify the Proclamation Declaring a Local Emergency Page 2
been fully assessed. The current forecast calls for continued storms and additional snow and rainfall which could further exacerbate the damage and increase the difficulty of recovery efforts.

As the rain continues, the Bureau of Reclamation will be required to continue its high releases from Shasta Dam. There is potential for additional local flooding and infrastructure damage.

Due to these events and weather conditions, a local emergency was proclaimed on February 11, 2025, and it is recommended that the Council ratify this proclamation and continue the declaration until such time that the threat of these storms has subsided, there is no longer an elevated risk to life and property, and the emergency restoration of facilities has been completed.

The local emergency was declared by the City Manager serving in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services under RMC 9.12.030. The Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services is attached.

Pursuant to Government Code section 8630, the Proclamation is valid for seven days. As such, if the Council does not act to adopt a resolution which confirms and ratifies the existence of a local emergency, the declaration of local emergency made under the Proclamation will lapse. A declaration of local emergency provides several benefits in time of emergency. Under Government Code section 8634, it permits a local agency to immediately promulgate orders and regulations necessary to protect the public health and safety. It further permits the State and local agencies to provide mutual aid to the City and makes the costs of such aid incurred by other agencies chargeable to the State. Lastly, the declaration of local emergency facilitates payment to the City by the State under the Disaster Assistance Act (Gov. Code section 8680 et seq.).

The resolution contains all the needed findings to continue the declaration of local emergency under the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code section 8550 et seq.). In the absence of action under Public Contract Code, the Council could declare an emergency under the California Emergency Service Act by a simple majority vote.

However, the resolution also seeks authorization under RMC 4.22.120 and Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050. As such, a fourth-fifths vote of the Council will be required to adopt the resolution. These sections provide authority which the Government Code, addressed above, does not. Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 collectively provide authority to repair or replace a public facility, and procure the necessary equipment, services and supplies for those purposes without competitive bidding. While notice and competitive bidding are very beneficial in non-emergency situations, these processes are entirely too untimely if we are to immediately protect the public health and safety by restoration of public services and facilities. This is necessary due to the immediate need to repair or replace the 120-inch culvert that failed at the entrance to the Reginato Boat Ramp. This ramp serves as a critical entry point for river access for public safety agencies to effectuate river rescues and to access areas along the river that are otherwise inaccessible. Additionally, river guides and other river related businesses utilize this ramp extensively and prolonged closure will cause significant economic hardship as well as impeding life saving efforts by the Redding Police Department and the Shasta County Sheriff.

It should be noted that RMC 4.22.120 delegates authority to the City Manager to make a finding that the emergency will not permit the delay resulting from a competitive solicitation of bids and that immediate action is necessary to respond to the emergency. However, that authority is only valid for a period of seven days. By making this finding now by means of adoption of the resolution, the Council avoids the unfortunate circumstance whereby the immediate action sought by the City Manager to repair or replace public infrastructure will lapse absent an Packet Pg. 255 Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 021825 Declaring local emergency (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding) Report to Redding City Council February 12, 2025
Re: 9.1(b)--Adopt Resolution to Confirm and Ratify the Proclamation Declaring a Local Emergency Page 3
immediate, emergency Council meeting. In order to ensure Council oversight, RMC

4.22.120(C)(1) requires review of action under Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 at every regular meeting until such time as the emergency ceases.

In summary, the resolution serves two important functions. It facilitates coordination with other public agencies assisting the City in responding to the local emergency and is a necessary precondition to receipt of state and federal aid. It also provides authority to the City to use its own resources in accomplishing repair or replacement of damaged public infrastructure in a timely and efficient manner while ensuring Council oversight of all such activity.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Emergency Declaration Flood of February 2025
^Resolution - Local Emergency Declaration 02-2025
Packet Pg. 256 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 021825 Declaring local emergency (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding) SfILUTItJN tJ. Z{ 25- t}1
RESOLUTION Ct NFI IN G EXISTEl I E ( 7 F A LOCAL EMER+GEI T4CY HE A5, Gt vernment Code secti an 8642 provides that whenever a state c r Iocal emergency exists, the governing bcrdy ofthe local govemmental entity shall meet as soon as possible;; and WHE AS, Redding Municipal Code sections 9, 12. 03C1, and 14.24. 02, generally empower the City Manager, as Director of Emerg ncy Services, tc proclaim the existence or threa en d existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Cc uncil is not in session5 and
W IE AS, Redding Municipal Cc de section 9. 12.030(C) provides that the decisic n of the City Manager tt declare a locaZ emergency must be ratified by the City Gouncil within seven ( 7} calendar days of th City Manager' s action ar it s iall haVe no further force or effect; and WHEREAS, R dding Municipal Cade section 4.22. 120 and P'ublic Contract Cade sectians 20168 and 22050 allow the City Cauncil to e pend public monies withc ut competiti e solicitation when safeguarding life, health, ar safety wi11 nt t permit delay; nd EFtEA, the City M nager, as L}irector of Emergency ` Servicea of the City of Redding, praclaimed the existence of a local emergency, as defined in Government Code section 8558( c), within the City on the 11th day of February, 2t?25, as evidenced by the Pr ciamation of the I irectflr of Emergenc Services attached and incarporated herein; and
E AS; the Proclamation ofthe Director ofEmergency Services dated February 1 l, 2025, was ser t to the County irector of Emergency Services on February 11, 2C}25; and WHE AS, conditions c#' extreme peril to the safety c f persans and prc perty have arisen within the City which were caused by flooding caused by severe winter storms which began on February 2, 2 25, and
HEREAS, the flooding has continued through increased releases from Shasta Dam inundating and dan aging land, raads, trails and other facilities, in particular the callapse of a 120" culvert acr ss the access rc ad t the Reginato Bc at Ramp whieh prc ides river access to public s fety agencies, an F bruary 9, 025, at which time the City Council of the City of Redding was nr t in session; and E AS, there is immediate need to repair tir replace the 20" culvert that failed at the entrance to the Reginato Sc at Ramp as this ramp serves as a critical entry point fc r river access fc r public s fety agencies tc effectuate river rescues and ta acce s areas along th river that are otherwise inaccessible.

Additionally, river guides and other river related businesses utilize this ramp extensively and prolanged closure will cause significant ecanomic hardship as well as impeding lifesaving efforts by the R.edding Pc lice Departrnent and the Shasta Cuunty Sheriff; and
WHE AS, the Baard of upervisor"s for the County af Shasta ratified a proclamation af a Local Emergency far hasta Caunty on February 1l, 2fl25, anci direeted that the prc clamation be sent tc the Governr r af the State of California and the Secretary ofthe +Office of Emergency Services requesting they proclaim the County c f Shasta to be in a state of emergency; and Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-011 - Declare Local Emergency with Proclamation (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to W IE A, the conditions caused by the flc ading are beyond the cantrol afthe services, personnei, equipment and facilities of the City ofRedding, and
WHE A, the City Ccruncil hereby finds that the afQresaid conditians of extreme peril did warrant and necessitate the proclam tion af the existence af a local emergency, 1 10W, THE F() , IT IS HE BY PRt CLAIIY ED AND ERED as follows:

1. The recitals s ated abave are true, correct, and are adopted herein.

2. The Prc clamation of the Directar t f Emergency Services dated February 11, 2025, is hereby confirmed and ratified.

3. That, pursuant to Government Code section 630{}, a local emergency withiz the meaning of Governrnent Cc de section 8558( c} exists within the jurisdictional limits of the City c f R dding.

4. That, pursuant to Public Contract Code section 20I68 and 22050, the public inter st nd riecessity d mand th immediate expenditure of public rr oney to safeguard life, health and property, the 1oca1 emergency will n t permit a delay resulting from a ct mpetitive solicitation fc r bids; immediate actic n is necessary to respond ta the lc cal emergency, and the City Manager is authc rized to repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by the Ic cal emergency; and procure the necessary equipment, services and supplies for those purpt ses without giving notice fc r bids tc let contracts,

5. That, pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22050( c( 1}, the tate of local ernergency shall e deeTned to continue tcr exist until its termination is proclairned by a resolutian adapted by a fourthfifths vote af the City Council.

6. That, pursuant to Government Code section 863{ e} and Fuhlic Contract ode section 22450( c}( 1); the City Cauncil shall review the need for continuing the lacal emergeney at every regularly scheduled meeting of the City Cauncil until the City Council terminates the local emergency:

I IE Y CERTIFY that the faregoing resalutic n was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council f the City nf Redding on the 1 Sth day af February, 2025, by the following votei A'i'ES: CQiTNCIL MEMBEIYS: - r. Dha auka, Littau, Resner, and Munns N? ES: CfJIJN+CIi:.ME ERS. - Nane
ABSENT: COUN+CTL lYIE ERS: - Au ette
m`
ABSTA l': COUI ICIL ME ERS. - Nane
s t -
u
JA+C MUNI iS,' ayar
ATTEST; PPRt V lD AS TO F'U :
y, ,
SHARLENE TIP' TI N, City Clerk CHRIS7C'I N M. CUR' IS, ity Attorney Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-011 - Declare Local Emergency with Proclamation (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to A PR(}+ LAM TIC} l'd UF
Tx Dr eTc + F m re s r vrcEs c F
CITI' QF RET)DIN, CALIFC1Rl TIA
W EREAS, Redding Municipal { RMC} sectian 9. 12. 030 and RMC 9. 12. 020 provide for the preparation and carrying aut of plans far the pratection af persons and property within the City 't the event af an emergency, and,
WHEPEAS, KMC sectic n 9. 12. t}30 states that the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services and the ssistant ity Manager is the Assistant Uirectar of Ernergency S rvices, and, WHEREA,S; RMC-section 9. 12. t}30 empowers the Director car Assistant I3irectar of Emergency Servzces ta proclaitn the existence r threatened existence of a local e nergency when the City Cc uncit is not in se sion, and;
WFl"E1tEAS, the I3irector of Emergency Services of the City of Redding does hereby fnd that conditians af extreme peril tc the safaty af pers€ns and prc perty have arisen within the City ofRedding, caused by flooding; which be an on the 2nd day of Febniary, 2025 and; WHEREAS, these c4nditiions are or are likely to be be ond the cantrot ofthe servicesy persont el, equipment, and facilities ofthe Ciiy of Redding, and; W IEREAS, the City Council af the City of Redding is not in session and cannot immediately be called inta session.
1VCtW, TH REFURL', IT IS HEREBY PRUC' A ELD, that a local emergency now exists througho it the City c f Redding, and;
IT IS FII 2THER PRO` Z;AY112"ED ANTI l7R ERE that durin the existence af said laca[ ernergency the pawers, functions and duties of the emergency organizatian afthe City of Redding shall be those prescribed by the state law, by ordinances, and Y esolutions ofthe City t f Redding; and that this emergency proclarnation shall expire 7 days after issuance unless confirmed and ratified by the City Cauncil of the City csf Redding.

IN T' STIMCINY WH E+1JF, Z HEREUNT() SET MY HAND ANU C.A€ISE THE SEAL l)F HE ITY CIF PEDTIING TU I`E AFF'IXE1) TH S llti AY( 1;' FEI R tIARY, 2025. a'i
a . . m.
r
i
Y „,'
S` ,, ";,,, ''`, t r """, , ...

DTRECT ' C? IVIERGEI' C SEI VICES
i
k
d
I'rint Name: Barry Tippin
t
x
t ' ikb iyrt p k. 1
7 Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-011 - Declare Local Emergency with Proclamation (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: NOE Parkview Sewer Siphon ER (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding) Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: NOE S. Bonnyview Storm Drain ER (4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Due to Flooding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply, accept, appropriate, and implement the United States Economic Development Administration’s Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 for infrastructure improvements located in the City of Redding Stillwater Business Park; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to identify and commit an equal match from Stillwater Business Park property sales.

Fiscal Impact
Authorizing a grant application to the United States Economic Development Administration’s (EDA) Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance (PWEAA) Program may result in a grant award of up to $5,000,000 with at least 50 percent required from local matching funds.

Median household income, poverty indicators, indicators of economic distress, and disadvantaged community statuses may reduce the required local match to a 20 percent minimum. Matching funds may be cash, loans, bonds or in-kind and shall be unencumbered, unrestricted and committed at the time of award. Staff endeavors to provide match in the form of cash from Stillwater Business Park property sales and will bring back a final match plan to City Council (Council) prior to accepting the grant. It is estimated that the Stillwater Business Park Phase 2A project cost is $10 million.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to authorize a grant application to the EDA PWEAA Program. This action would require staff to identify alternative funding sources to assist with the Stillwater Business Park infrastructure development.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration Jason Gibilisco, Management
Assistant to the City Manager
Packet Pg. 27
Report to Redding City Council May 26, 2025
Re: 4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration Page 2 Background/Analysis
The EDA is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that administers programs that are intended to boost economic development as measured by job creation and retention. The PWEAA Program offers funding to projects that align with regional economic plans and are expected to create or retain high-quality, well-paying jobs. The PWEAA also recognizes the roles that infrastructure and public works facilities can play in economic development at the regional and local levels. Public works projects that serve to provide economic access are eligible for investment from the EDA as jobs are created by improving workforce access or commercial development in a given area, and each is scored by its alignment with regional economic planning efforts.

On November 16, 2021, Council approved the Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 (Stillwater Phase 2) Project in the amount of $1.5 million. This project funded specific consultant costs needed to plan and design the infrastructure improvements for the Stillwater Phase 2 Project as well as staff costs related to project development that encompasses surveys, environmental clearance, right of way acquisitions with appraisals and design work for road construction, wet and dry utilities installation, storm drains, street lights and other necessary items. Infrastructure improvements for the Stillwater Phase 2 Project include improvements from Old Oregon Trail through the business park on Venture Parkway and concludes at the intersection of Fig Tree Lane and Airport Road.

As part of this project, Dokken Engineering was contracted to provide 100 percent plans for the Stillwater Phase 2 Project.

Funding for the development of the Stillwater Phase 2 infrastructure improvements is presently being compiled by staff. In an effort to source funding for the infrastructure improvements, staff wishes to apply to the EDA for PWEAA grant funds to construct the infrastructure. However, since only limited funds are available for the PWEAA grant, the PWEAA grant application will not be for the entire Stillwater Phase 2 Project, but for a portion of the project from the current cul-de-sac terminus of Venture Parkway, south to the second bridge that crosses Stillwater Creek, resulting in a partial construction phase of approximately one mile. These frontage improvements would start from lot 12 and end at the City of Redding lot, adjacent to lot 16 wherein Redding Electric Utility will be building a future substation.

Staff previously brought the EDA PWEAA grant to the Council on February 20, 2024. The estimated construction cost at this time for Stillwater Phase 2A was $6 million. Due to rising costs of infrastructure improvements, staff is seeking to apply for a higher amount of funding.

The maximum EDA PWEAA grant program limit is $5 million per project. Therefore, assuming a 50 percent match, the requested EDA PWEAA grant will be for $5 million.

Environmental Review
Applying for grant funds is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The construction phase of the project is presently being reviewed for CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act compliance.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development - “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.

Packet Pg. 28
Report to Redding City Council May 26, 2025
Re: 4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration Page 3 Attachments
February 20, 2024 Staff Report
November 16, 2021 Staff Report
Packet Pg. 29

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply, accept, appropriate and implement the United States Economic Development Administration’s Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 for infrastructure improvements located in the City of Redding Stillwater Business Park.

Fiscal Impact
Authorizing a grant application to the United States Economic Development Administration’s (EDA) Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance (PWEAA) Program may result in a grant award of up to $3,000,000 with at least 50 percent required from local matching funds.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose to not authorize a grant application to the EDA PWEAA Program. This action would require staff to identify alternative funding sources to assist with the Stillwater Business Park infrastructure development.

MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: February 20, 2024 Staff Report (4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2024
Re: 4.2(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration Page 2 Background/Analysis
The EDA is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce that administers programs that are intended to boost economic development as measured by job creation and retention. The PWEAA Program offers funding to projects that align with regional economic plans and are expected to create or retain high-quality, well-paying jobs. The PWEAA also recognizes the roles that infrastructure and public works facilities can play in economic development at the regional and local levels. Public works projects that serve to provide economic access are eligible for investment from the EDA as jobs are created by improving workforce access or commercial development in a given area, and each is scored by its alignment with regional economic planning efforts.

On November 16, 2021, Council approved the Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 (Stillwater Phase 2) Project in the amount of $1.5 million. This project funded specific consultant costs needed to plan and design the infrastructure improvements for the Stillwater Phase 2 Project as well as staff costs related to project development that encompasses surveys, environmental clearance, right of way acquisitions with appraisals and design work for road construction, wet and dry utilities installation, storm drains, street lights and other necessary items. Infrastructure improvements for the Stillwater Phase 2 Project include improvements from Old Oregon Trail through the Park on Venture Parkway and concludes at the intersection of Fig Tree Lane and Airport Road. As part of this project, Dokken Engineering was contracted to provide 100 percent plans for the Stillwater Phase 2 Project.

Funding for the development of the Stillwater Phase 2 infrastructure improvements is presently being compiled by staff. In an effort to source funding for the infrastructure improvements, staff wishes to apply to the EDA for PWEAA grant funds to construct the infrastructure. However, since only limited funds are available for the PWEAA grant, the PWEAA grant application will not be for the entire Stillwater Phase 2 Project, but for a portion of the Project from the current cul-de-sac terminus of Venture Parkway, south to the second bridge that crosses Stillwater Creek, resulting in a partial construction phase of approximately one mile. These frontage improvements would start from lot 12 and end at the City of Redding lot, adjacent to lot 16 wherein Redding Electric Utility will be building a future substation.

The estimated construction cost for Stillwater Phase 2A of the project is $6 million. The maximum EDA PWEAA grant program limit is $5 million per project and grant advisors recommended submitting applications in the $3 million range to have better success outcomes.

Therefore, assuming a 50 percent match, the requested EDA PWEAA grant will be for $3 million.

Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: February 20, 2024 Staff Report (4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2024
Re: 4.2(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration Page 3 Attachments
Previous Staff Report - November 16, 2021
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: February 20, 2024 Staff Report (4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize staff to develop a Request for Proposal for the design of infrastructure improvements for the Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Project; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 19th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $1,500,000 for said purpose.

Fiscal Impact
The Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Project is being funded by the General Fund. The attached budget resolution in the amount of $1,500,000 will fund ongoing project development costs for this project to ensure delivery timelines for prospective tenants. The General Fund has previous property sales to cover $650,000 of the projected cost, while the remaining amount is expected to be realized through near term property sales. The funding source of the construction of the necessary improvements has not yet been determined.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not authorize funding for the design of Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Project and provide staff with alternative direction. Without this project, the City of Redding (City) will not fulfill its obligation of providing a completed business park to its tenants. As developer, the City is responsible for providing adequate roadways, utilities, and various other infrastructure improvements to ensure the business park is useable for current and future tenants.

MEETING DATE: November 16, 2021
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Infrastructure Improvement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: November 16, 2021 Staff Report (4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration) Report to Redding City Council November 12, 2021
Re: 4.11(g)--Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Infrastructure Improvement Project Page 2 Background/Analysis
The City is responsible for infrastructure improvements at Stillwater Business Park, including street lights, paving, landscaping, and utility installation. At the mid-year budget review in February 2021, the Council approved an allocation of $500,000 out of the proceeds from land sales to fund the design of the infrastructure improvements at the Park.

In August 2021, the Council approved the appropriation of $150,000 for the construction bid for Phase 1C of this project that included the installation of street lighting on Venture Parkway from the Stillwater Business Park entrance at Old Oregon Trail through the east side of the northerly Stillwater Creek Bridge.

To continue the necessary road extension and utility work, staff is recommending an increase in project budget funds from the General Fund Capital Project Fund in the amount of $1,500,000.

This additional allocation is needed for staff and consultant costs related to project development including but not limited to surveys, design, environmental clearance, and right of way acquisitions with appraisals for the remainder of the improvements. The design work will include road construction, wet and dry utility installation, storm drains, street lights and other miscellaneous items to complete improvements to Venture Parkway from Rancho Road through the south end of the park to Fig Tree Lane concluding at the intersection of Fig Tree Lane and Airport Road. The work will include widening projects along Rancho Road and Fig Tree Lane and intersection improvements that may include Rancho Road/Airport Road and also Fig Tree Lane/Airport Road.

With the sale of additional lots, the improvements which were halted need to resume in order to adhere to what was intended with the development of the park. This additional allocation will be funded with property sales receipts. Property sales in this fiscal year are in excess of $900,000, and it is anticipated that this fiscal year will see an additional $3 million in proceeds from additional land transactions. Additional work on the park will be budgeted for completion in the coming months.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Vicinity Map Exhibit 1
Previous Staff Reports - 08-03-21 and 02-16-21 (available online) Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: November 16, 2021 Staff Report (4.1(b)--Grant Application - Economic Development Administration)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to issue a loan between the City of Redding’s Risk Management Reserve and the Airports Division’s Enterprise Fund in order to fund the Redding Regional Airport Passenger Terminal Parking Lot Reconstruction Project in an amount not-toexceed $1.5 million – the loan will be amortized annually over a 10-year term at the averaged pooled cash rate with annual payments of $132,670, and a projected balloon payment in the amount of $500,000.

Fiscal Impact
If approved, the City Manager would issue a loan to the Airports Division’s Enterprise Fund from the Risk Management Reserve in the amount of $1.5 million. As proposed, the Airports Division would make annual payments of $132,670 for a 10-year term at the average pooled cash rate at the time of the loan with an anticipated balloon payment of $500,000. At the end of the term, the balloon payment will be analyzed based on Airports Division revenues and a refinance of the balloon payment will be presented to City Council (Council) for consideration.

Alternative Action
Council may choose not to authorize the City Manager to issue the loan and provide staff alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
The Redding Regional Airport (RDD) Passenger Terminal Parking Lot is in overall poor condition due to wear and tear from increased passenger traffic and its lack of eligibility for preservation or rehabilitation funding from traditional airport grant funding sources. The Airports Division has utilized operating funds to initiate the design for the parking lot reconstruction and is requesting a City of Redding (City) General Fund loan to enable the project to proceed in fall MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.2(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(b)--Authorize Loan between City of Redding Risk Management Reserve and Airports Division Enterprise Fund
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 35
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.2(b)--Authorize Loan between City Risk Management Reserve and Airports Enterprise Funds Page 2
2025 concurrent with the Runway Rehabilitation project in order to minimize further disruptions to RDD customers. Parking lots are typically difficult for small and medium airports to maintain because of the overall costs, disruption to services, and lack of eligibility for federal and state grant funding for airports.

The Airports Division contracts with a parking management company to operate the paid parking areas which generate a significant portion of airport revenues. Rental car parking and employee parking are not part of this oversight. As part of the City’s Master Fee Schedule update, the Airports Division is proposing an increase to the parking lot daily rates from $10 per day to $12 per day which will be used towards the financing costs associated with the proposed loan.

In addition, the parking lot concession agreement is due for renegotiation and the Airports Division anticipates receiving more favorable concession rates from the operator which would further increase revenues from paid parking. As part of the design for the reconstruction, the Airports Division has also incorporated infrastructure updates to enable the airport or its parking operator to install and utilize license plate reader technology to enhance the security of the parking lot and ensure the highest effective capture rate of parking revenues. There are no current plans to make changes to short-term parking rate, which is currently free for the first four hours in order to facilitate public access to airport concessionaires such as the restaurant operated by a private party.

Environmental Review
This activity, internal loan negotiation and execution, is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If funded, the parking lot reconstruction project will be reviewed for compliance with CEQA. No further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Packet Pg. 36

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Good News Rescue Mission’s Day Resource Center:
(1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Provider Operational Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission;
(2) Find that entering into a Provider Operational Agreement is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, the actual construction of the project was previously reviewed for California Environmental Quality Act compliance; and (3) Find that entering into a Provider Operational Agreement is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act under Title 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund fiscal impact related to this report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the City Manager to execute the Provider Operational Agreement (Operational Agreement) or provide alternate direction to staff.

Without an operational agreement, the Good News Rescue Mission (GNRM) would operate the Day Resource Center (DRC) without formal oversight or enforceable obligations, despite the requirement under the Development Funding Agreement (DFA) to provide and adhere to an Operational Agreement.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.2(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(c)--Authorize and Approve a Provider Operational Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 37
Report to Redding City Council May 28, 2025
Re: 4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement Page 2 Background/Analysis
On September 21, 2023, the Encampment Resolution Funding 3-L (ERF-3-L) Program Standard Agreement was executed in the amount of $8,354,955. The purpose of the ERF-3-L grant is to support outreach, provide supportive services, and facilitate connections to shelter for those living in the Linden/Mercy Canyon and Progress/Technology Way encampments.

On November 21, 2023, Council approved ERF-3-L funds for development of a DRC. On December 19, 2023, Council directed staff to negotiate a DFA with GNRM for $3,000,000 to support the acquisition and development of the DRC at 3145 Veda Street (Property). In addition, staff was instructed to negotiate an Operational Agreement and return to Council within 180 days. On August 20, 2024, Council extended the timeline for consideration of the Operational Agreement.

In March 2024, the GNRM finalized the acquisition of the property and has since conducted five community meetings for input on the DRC operations and design. The community feedback received through these sessions has directly informed both the architectural design and operational framework of the DRC. Staff negotiated the Operational Agreement with the GNRM and has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office.

The purpose of the attached Operational Agreement is to articulate the scope of services to be delivered to DRC consumers and to help guide the GNRM in what information should be included in the GNRM’s specific DRC Operational Plan (GNRM Plan) that is to be submitted to the Council for approval, 180 days prior to the completion of the DRC rehabilitation project.

The subject Operational Agreement requires the GNRM Plan be completed by September 30, 2026.

In general, the DRC’s program focus is to centralize and streamline access to a spectrum of interventions and services to support persons experiencing homelessness, including those coming out of encampments, with the final objective of connecting the participants to housing. The programming will provide a welcoming and safe environment where participants can access local case management, educational and volunteer opportunities, medical and mental health care, and a supportive community network to help direct and achieve their journey to obtain housing.

Additionally, the Operational Agreement outlines the requirements related to site management, service coordination, data collection, reporting, and program evaluation and the overall written policies and procedures governing the operation and administration of the DRC. Upon receipt of the GNRM Plan, staff will present a Funding Agreement to Council to support staff-related operational costs of the DRC.

The GNRM anticipates the DRC project will begin construction July 2025. The building permits have been approved and issued by the Development Services Department with an encroachment permit pending. GNRM and its engineering team has been diligently working on finalizing design revisions related to the sewer main and lateral connections. Once the encroachment permit is issued, the project will proceed into the bidding phase. The DRC is estimated to be operational by September 2026.

Packet Pg. 38
Report to Redding City Council May 28, 2025
Re: 4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement Page 3 Environmental Review
Approving the Operational Agreement is not considered a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The actual construction of the project was previously reviewed for CEQA compliance.

Under the National Environmental Act (NEPA), administrative and management activities such as approving agreements are considered exempt activities and no further action is required. The actual construction of the project was reviewed for NEPA requirements before the project started.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement Staff Report - August 20, 2024
Staff Report - February 20, 2024
Staff Report - December 19, 2023
Staff Report - November 21, 2023
Packet Pg. 39
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to approve an extension to the timeline to develop an Operations Agreement for the Day Resource Center.

Fiscal Impact
The Good News Rescue Mission’s (GNRM) Day Resource Center (DRC) Project includes both capital and operational costs that are funded by the Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF)-3-L Program. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve the DRC Operations Agreement extension, and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On September 21, 2023, a ERF-3-L Program standard agreement in the amount of $8,354,955 was executed. The ERF-3-L grant’s intent is to provide outreach, supportive services and connection to shelter for those living in the Linden/Mercy Canyon and Progress/Technology Way encampments.

On November 21, 2023, Council approved the appropriation of the grant award and provided direction on grant awarded line items of including Crisis Intervention Response Team officers; case managers; street outreach; housing; day resource center; GNRM rehabilitation project; and City staff costs.

MEETING DATE: August 20, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)--Day Resource Center Operational Agreement Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 87 Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Staff Report - August 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Report to Redding City Council August 13, 2024
Re: 4.2(a)--Day Resource Center Operational Agreement Page 2 On February 20, 2024, Council approved the appropriation of funding for the DRC and directed staff to negotiate an operations agreement for the DRC within 180 days of execution of the DFA (September 9, 2024).

A development funding agreement was fully executed between the City and GNRM on March 13, 2024. Since that time, Housing Division staff has met regularly with GNRM and they have conducted at least three community meetings for the DRC design and operations research. These meetings and outreach efforts have created the basis of the operational agreement. Currently, the agreement is in draft form and staff is negotiating final details. Staff anticipates this will take an additional 60 days. Once both parties’ legal counsels have completed their review, staff will return to Council with the final agreement.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Packet Pg. 88 Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Staff Report - August 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Staff Report - February 20, 2024 (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Provide direction to staff regarding the location, the purchase and development, and the operation of a Navigation/Day Resource Center.

Fiscal Impact
The Encampment Resolution Lookback Disbursement Funding (ERF-3-L) provides $8,354,955 in grant funds to the City of Redding (City) as detailed in the California Department General Services – Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency (BCSH) Standard Agreement. As part of the ERF-3-L grant award, $3,000,000 was allocated toward the development of a Day Resource Center (DRC). In addition, $720,000 has been earmarked for a director and case management services upon the completion of the project and for the first three years of operation. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
City Council (Council) may choose to take no action, may choose to consider other DRC location/development alternatives or may choose to not pursue a DRC development project. If Council chooses not to pursue the DRC project, any request for redirection of ERF-3-L funds will need to be reviewed and approved by BCSH and could result in losing the grant award.

MEETING DATE: December 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.2(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(g)--Consider providing direction to staff regarding a Navigation/Day Resource Center
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Staff Report - December 19, 2023 [Revision 1] (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Report to Redding City Council December 14, 2023
Re: 9.2(g) Provide direction to staff regarding a Day Resource Center Page 2 Background/Analysis
At the meeting of November 21, 2023, Council discussed several possible directions with regard to developing a DRC.

Option 1: Publish a request for proposals, seeking input from the development community for possible DRC sites within the requested service area.

Option 2: City to purchase a property and provide a lease option to the operator.

Option 3: City staff to partner with the Good News Rescue Mission (Mission) directly, with regard to the property already in escrow, and determine the Mission’s interest in a DRC.

Council requested additional information for option three and directed staff to contact the Mission. Staff met with Jonathan Anderson, the Mission’s Executive Director. The Mission has been negotiating with the property owner of 3145 Veda Street and 3150 South Market Street (Properties) for more than eight months for the purpose of establising a DRC. Furthermore, the GNRM purchased 3127 Veda Street and 3131 Veda Street, located adjacent to the properties in escrow. The combined properties consist of approximately .59 acres with an existing commercial building of approximately 8,000 square feet, with power, sewer, water, four roll-up doors, and a parking lot.

All parcels are located in a “Heavy Commercial” designated land use area. Under the use regulations, Heavy Commercial will allow a community social service facility use classification upon review and approval of a use permit by the Planning Commission. A community social service facility is defined as any non-commercial facility such as a day center, which may provide meals, showers and/or laundry facilities along with specialized programs and services related to the needs of those using the facility. The GNRM may be able to amend its current use permit to include the new properties.

Overall, the Mission’s preferred option is for the City to provide financing in the form a secured loan to the Mission. The financing would be available for the acquision, development and two to three years of operational funding of the DRC. The City would have no ownership in the project nor a covenant on the property. As proposed, the Mission would operate the facility under a new brand, completely separate from the existing Mission operations. The newly branded entity would collaborate with other agencies and nonprofits to co-locate services at the site. Although not their preferred choice, the Mission would consider a lease-option for purchase of the Properties from the City.

The Mission has received costs estimates from contractors – they have estimated that the cost to renovate the space is approximately $150 per square-foot. Planning and design work would include a high-level master plan for the properties with additional considerations contemplated for existing Mission-owned parcels, improvement plans, construction costs, electrical calculations, and energy efficiency measures. The rehabilitation would include improvements such as Title 24 (Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards), fire safety, Americans with Disabilities Act upgrades and required City permits. The timeline is estimated to be three to four months for predevelopment activities and six-to-eight months for construction which includes framing, new windows and exterior doors, mechanical upgrades, insulation, sheetrock, interior doors and trim, cabinets, finish work signage, appliances, courtyard creation and landscaping.

If the Council approves the City providing financing, staff would draft a development financing agreement that would include the terms, conditions, finance/loan documents and regulatory requirements and return to the City Council for consideration.

Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Staff Report - December 19, 2023 [Revision 1] (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Report to Redding City Council December 14, 2023
Re: 9.2(g) Provide direction to staff regarding a Day Resource Center Page 3 Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. A National Environmental Policy Act review is not necessary as these are State of California and not Federal funds.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
GNRM Properties Location Map Aerial
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Staff Report - December 19, 2023 [Revision 1] (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Railroad Ave
Veda St
S Market St
Grange St
Grange St
3127 Veda St
Purchased
3100 S. Market
GNRM Existing Shelter
3145 Veda St
Escrow
3150 S. Market St
Escrow
3131 Veda St
Purchased
U.P.R.R
GNRM Properties Location Map / City of Redding
Print Date: December 11, 2023 P:\CommunityServices\ProProjects\Veda Street Location Map.aprx 0 60 120 180
Feet Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Staff Report - December 19, 2023 [Revision 1] (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $8,354,960 of Encampment Resolution Funding Lookback Disbursement Round 3 (ERF-3-L) funds and adding a full-time, Housing Specialist I/II position to the Housing Division;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Development Funding Agreement with the Good News Rescue Mission for maintenance improvements in an amount not to exceed $500,000;
(3) Direct staff to prepare a request for proposals for eligible scope of work items as identified on the attached Grant Expenditure Summary which includes housing case managers; interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase; and day resource center director and case manager; and prioritize the release of each request for proposal; and
(4) Determine that allocating grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Administration and activity delivery costs of $473,455 will assist in funding associated staff contract administration costs and an additional staff person. There is no impact to the General Fund, and the ERF-3-L grant does not require matching funds.

MEETING DATE: November 21, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) 3-L Award Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 174 Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Staff Report - November 21, 2023 [Revision 1] (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Report to Redding City Council November 15, 2023
Re: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to give staff direction to prepare Request for Proposals (RFPs) and staff would work within the Standard Agreement and funding guidelines to implement the ERF-3-L funds. Or, Council could provide alternate direction to staff. If Council redirects funds within categories or changes a category, ERF-3-L funds may be lost or reduced by the BCSH.

Background/Analysis
On February 21, 2023, Council authorized and approved Housing Division staff to submit a grant application through the BCSH for the ERF-3-L Program. The City’s initial application was denied. However, staff revised the application with a focus on a cohesive project that provided support services to specific encampments connected to a day resource center and was awarded $8,354,955 in ERF-3-L grant funds.

On September 21, 2023, a Standard Agreement detailing the budget, scope of work, and terms and conditions of the funding was executed. The ERF-3-L grant’s intent is to provide outreach, supportive services and connection to shelter for those living in the Linden/Mercy Canyon, Progress/Technology Way Encampments (Encampments) or the Good News Rescue Mission area.

As proposed in the grant application, the City’s primary means of providing outreach and services is through the Crisis Intervention Response Team (CIRT) officers, coupled with housing case manager services. The case managers will assist CIRT in their efforts and provide more intensive services by connecting unsheltered persons to shelter and housing options along with other community resources such as employment options, public benefits, medical or dental care or drug and alcohol abuse rehabilitation. In addition, the grant will fund sanitation support for the encampments and case managers with housing placement support assistance that includes:
deposits, application fees, and furnishings for no more than 50 people.

ERF-3-L funding also specifically provides for maintenance improvements to the Good News Rescue Mission (GNRM). These maintenance needs include a new roof, kitchen upgrade and remodel, laundry and privacy screening improvements, if the budget allows. The City Manager and staff will work with the GNRM to determine the full scope of the maintenance improvements and will negotiate a development funding agreement to set forth the terms and conditions of the grant funding and GNRM project.

Lastly, the ERF-3-L award includes funding for specific categories that include: interim housing/motel room partnerships; day resource center purchase and rehabilitation; and a day resource center director and case manager to support the center for the first three years of operation. At the Council’s discretion, each one of these categories can be the subject of a request for proposal that can be drafted by staff and reviewed and approved by the Council and/or the City Manager – ERF-3-L funding allows either path for selection.

Over the last year, the City has strived to provide leadership surrounding the unsheltered crisis in our community. As such, staff has diligiently competed for grants to help the community assist this vulnerable population, but with more grants, comes more workload and responsibility. The Housing Division’s goal is to continue its level of service to the community while also providing Packet Pg. 175 Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Staff Report - November 21, 2023 [Revision 1] (4.2(c)--Good News Rescue Mission Provider Operational Agreement) Report to Redding City Council November 15, 2023
Re: 9.2(a)--Appropriate Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF-3-L) Award Page 3 succession planning for three possible staff retirements within the next two years. As such, additional staff is needed to support the Housing Division’s projects, programs, and goals. Staff requests the addition of one, full-time Housing Specialist position to assist with the day-to-day administration of the Encampment grant award. With the addition of this position, the Housing Division will have 20 positions, consisting of 19.5 full-time and one ½ time employees.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. A National Environmental Policy Act review is not necessary as these are State of California and not Federal funds.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5584 – System Hardening Equipment for the City of Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Award Bid 5584 to OneSource Supply Solutions for an annual evaluated price of $208,450.05;
(2) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the bid award annually with OneSource Supply Solutions through March 31, 2028, if mutually agreeable, with all prices, terms and conditions remaining the same; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve an additional $83,000 per fiscal year as a contingency to account for unforeseen cost escalations including, but not limited to, tariffs and global supply chain disruptions.

Fiscal Impact
The purchase of System Hardening Equipment was included in Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) General System Improvements Fiscal Year 2023-25 Biennial Budget and the Overhead/Underground Infrastructure Replacement Project for the Electric Utility Line Construction Services. These efforts are expected to continue into the Fiscal Year 2025-2027 Biennial Budget cycle.

In the five-year plan previously presented to the City Council (Council), funding for this, including General System Improvements, was anticipated to be funded by bond proceeds. If capital expenses associated with these efforts are projected to exceed the approved budget, staff will return with recommendations for any necessary budgetary adjustments.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to award the bid to OneSource Supply Solutions and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5584 - System Hardening Equipment Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 174
Report to Redding City Council May 28, 2025
Re: 4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5584 - System Hardening Equipment Page 2 Background/Analysis
This routine annual bid to purchase System Hardening Equipment allows REU to order materials as needed based on evaluated quantities and warehouse inventory. System Hardening Equipment are materials that enhance the resilience and reliability of the power system by reducing the likelihood of faults that cause electrical arcs. These materials are necessary to support REU’s wildfire mitigation program and include equipment such as nonarcing fuses, covered jumper wire, fault indicators, and wildlife equipment guards. These assemblies are also required to support REU’s planned infrastructure replacement projects, contributing to increased system reliability, and provide emergency replacement availability for existing facilities.

On April 15, 2025, staff opened two bid proposals. Based on overall cost and product pricing analysis, staff recommends awarding Bid 5584 to OneSource Supply Solutions.

Due to ongoing political uncertainty in the United States, vendors cannot reliably project future tariff rates. The requested contingency includes the standard 20 percent allowance for unforeseen cost escalations, as well as an additional allowance to cover a potential 20 percent tariff on imported materials associated with this bid. If such a tariff is enacted, the City Manager will direct staff to amend the purchase agreement to reflect any resulting cost increase. If the total cost exceeds both the base award and all authorized contingency amounts, staff will be instructed to cancel the award and initiate a new bid solicitation.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^5584 Bid Tab
Packet Pg. 175

CITY OF REDDING

PURCHASING DIVISION-TABULATION OF BIDS
BID SCHEDULE NO. DATE OF OPENING

TIME OF OPENING
3:00 P.M.

ITEM QTY UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
$ 208,440.05 $ 234,158.00
Corrected Total $208.450.05

DESCRIPTION
BID: System Hardening Equipment
5584
Zettel
Hopwood
OneSource
Supply Solutions Anixter
Evaluated Total
WEDNESDAY, April 16, 2025
S. Froeber - Purchasing Division
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: ^5584 Bid Tab (4.5(a)--Award of Bid Schedule No. 5584 - System Hardening Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution revising City Council Policy No. 806 (Recreation Classes and Program Fees), to include increased cost recovery and an additional 15 percent administrative fee, as recommended by the Community Services Advisory Commission at its regular meeting held on May 14, 2025.

Fiscal Impact
The combined proposed adjustments are projected to generate an additional $45,000 in revenue for Community Services Department’s Recreation Division (Recreation), leading to a 3.7 percent annual reduction in anticipated General Fund expenses for the Fiscal Years 2025 to 2027.

Revenue targets for this period have also been raised to reflect additional program costs to align with the overall market conditions, increased program expenses, and rising staff costs.

Alternative Action
City Council (Council) could choose not to adopt the resolution or approve changes to Council Policy 806 and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
In July 2001, the Council approved City Council Policy 806, establishing criteria for setting fees for recreation classes and programs. The policy was last updated in November 2019, and currently requires fees for classes and programs to be set at rates that recover a target percentage of the direct cost to provide the programs. The policy defines direct cost as materials, supplies, and part-time personnel costs required to conduct the specific class or program. Administration personnel, facilities, and overhead costs are not included in the cost recovery. The current target for youth classes and programs is 90 percent, and 105 percent for adults. Since adopting the MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and approve changes to Council Policy 806 Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 177
Report to Redding City Council May 28, 2025
Re: 4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806 Page 2 policy in 2001, Recreation has successfully met or exceeded the cost recovery targets for both youth and adult fee-based programs.

As the City of Redding (City) works to balance its upcoming budget, staff is tasked with either generating additional revenues or reducing program costs. Recreation operates as a service to the community and does not fully recover all its costs. After accounting for all revenue, the annual cost to the City for these services is approximately $1.22 million. Increasing revenue is essential to maintain staffing and service levels consistent with prior budget years.

To address this challenge, staff is proposing adjustments to Council Policy 806. For youth programming, this report recommends keeping the cost recovery percentage for City residents unchanged at 90 percent. For participants living outside of the City, however, the cost recovery percentage should be adjusted to 100 percent of direct costs in order to eliminate the subsidization of programming for non-residents. Furthermore, for all programs, it is recommended that an administrative fee of 15 percent of the program’s cost be added to help recuperate some of the non-direct and overhead expenses of the department.

In addition to the program fee, since November 2010, Recreation participants pay a Technology Surcharge Fee of five percent on all fee-based programs. This fee covers technology-related expenses including registration software and various marketing and design expenses.

To gauge the palatability of these changes, staff compared Recreation’s offerings to the local market offerings. Summer camps are typically the program with the highest participant cost.

Staff found other comparable camp programs charge between $230 (YMCA) and $267 (Sun Oaks) per week, per participant. For a Redding resident in the 2026 season, staff anticipates increasing City-run camp programs would slightly increase from $205 to $225 for residents and $250 for non-residents. Staff believes the fees are reasonable given the additional services provided as opposed to comparable camps, which include weekly field trips and Aquatic Center visits. These costs will fall within the reasonable market rate for camps in the Redding area.

Updates to the policy will be reflected in Recreation programs beginning in August 2025.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all Funds.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^Updated Council Policy 806_Clean
^Updated Council Policy 806_Strikethrough
2019_Dec 3 Staff Report Regarding Rec Fee Policy
2019_Dec 17 Staff Report Adopting Reso Confirming Revisions to Council Policy 806 Packet Pg. 178
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDDING ADOPTING REVISIONS TO CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO.
806, RECREATION CLASSES AND FEES
WHEREAS, in January 2001 the City Council of the City of Redding adopted Resolution No. 01-108 establishing cost recovery targets when setting fees for recreation classes and programs; and
WHEREAS, the Recreation Division sets program fees quarterly based on program expenses and participation levels; and
WHEREAS, the State of California passed legislation in April 2016 raising the minimum wage incrementally from $10 to $15 per hour by January 1, 2022, for employers with 26 employees or more; and
WHEREAS, in December 2019, policy was updated to be set at rates that recover a target percentage of the direct cost to provide the programs; and WHEREAS, implementation of this policy will provide staff with direction to update fees regularly to reflect existing conditions and exempts free programs; and WHEREAS, implementation of this policy will provide staff the ability to include an administrative fee and an increase to the cost recovery percentage to non-Redding residents to decrease general fund subsidy for programming;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding that revised City Council Policy No. 806, as attached hereto, is adopted.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
____________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Recreation Classes and Program Fees

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-108 806 6-5-01 1

BACKGROUND
The City of Redding’s Recreation Division of the Community Services Department offers more than 800 classes and programs to more than 16,000 participants annually. Changes in wages and participation rates directly affect the cost of providing these programs. In order to maintain a costrecovery ratio that is reasonable, and within budgeted funds, flexibility is needed to make adjustments as needed.

PURPOSE
Establish a policy for the rate at which City recreation programs recover direct costs and to provide staff with authority to make adjustments to fees when program costs or revenues change.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City Council that:
1) For City of Redding residents, youth recreation class/program fees are set at a rate to target a ninety percent (90%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 2) Youth recreation class/program fees for non-City residents will target one hundred percent (100%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 3) Adult recreation class/program fees are set at a rate to target one hundred five percent (105%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 4) A fifteen percent (15%) administrative fee shall be charged and included in the program cost to partially offset overhead costs for all programs, except free programs identified by this policy.
5) Free programs including those conducted at the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Center, the Junior Giants baseball program, open play at Fantasy Fountain, and fitness classes at the Senior Citizens Hall, are excluded.

Direct costs are defined as materials, supplies, and part-time personnel costs required to conduct the specific class or program. Administration personnel, overhead costs, and facilities are not included.

PROCEDURE
As the class/program roster is established in the months prior to the schedule being published, staff will review attendance and costs of prior programs, evaluate current costs and set a class/program Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: ^Updated Council Policy 806_Clean (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Recreation Classes and Program Fees

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-108 806 6-5-01 2
fee projected to recover the appropriate percentage based on activity. Quarterly, staff will review actual fee recovery experience to monitor compliance.

Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: ^Updated Council Policy 806_Clean (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Recreation Classes and Program Fees

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-108 806 6-5-01 1
C:\users\tipton\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\[email protected]\work\attac hments\25310.docx

BACKGROUND
The City of Redding’s Recreation Division of the Community Services Department offers more than 350 800 classes and programs to more than 13,00016,000 participants annually. Changes in wages and participation rates directly affect the cost of providing these programs. In order to maintain a cost-recovery ratio that is reasonable, and within budgeted funds, flexibility is needed to make adjustments as needed.

PURPOSE
ETo establish a policy for the rate at which City recreation programs should be recovering direct costs and to provide staff with authority to make adjustments to fees when program costs or revenues change.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City Council that:
1) For City of Redding residents, Yyouth recreation class/program fees are set at a rate to target a ninety percent (90%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 1)2) Youth recreation class/program fees for non-City residents will target one hundred percent (100%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 3) Adult recreation class/program fees are set at a rate to target one hundred five percent (105%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 2)4)A fifteen percent (15%) administrative fee shall be charged and included in the program cost to partially offset overhead costs for all programs, except free programs identified by this policy.
3)5)Free programs including those conducted at the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Center, the Junior Giants baseball program, open play at Fantasy Fountain, and fitness classes at the Senior Citizens Hall, are excluded.

PROCEDURE
As the class/program roster is established in the months prior to the schedule being published, staff will review attendance and costs of prior programs, evaluate current costs and set a class/program Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: ^Updated Council Policy 806_Strikethrough (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Recreation Classes and Program Fees

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-108 806 6-5-01 2
C:\users\tipton\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\[email protected]\work\attac hments\25310.docx
fee projected to recover the appropriate percentage based on activity. Quarterly, staff will review actual fee recovery experience to monitor compliance.

Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: ^Updated Council Policy 806_Strikethrough (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve revisions to City Council Policy: 806 – Recreation Classes and Program Fees that include increased cost recovery and exempting free programs from the policy. The Community Services Advisory Commission reviewed this proposal at its regular meeting on November 13, 2019 and recommends it for adoption.

Fiscal Impact
Should the City Council (Council) approve the revised Recreation Classes and Program Fees Policy, there will be no new expenses as the costs are currently being incurred. However, revenues to the General Fund may be less, estimated at $15,000 this fiscal year.

Alternative Action
The Council could decline to approve the recommended revisions to City Council Policy 806 or provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
In July 2001, the Council approved City Council Policy 806, establishing criteria for setting fees for recreation classes and programs. The current policy requires fees for classes and programs to be set at rates that recover a target percentage of the direct cost to provide the programs. The target for youth classes and programs is 85% and for adults, it is 100%. The policy defines direct costs as materials, supplies, and part-time personnel costs required to conduct the specific class or program. Administration personnel, facilities, and overhead costs are not included in the cost recovery.

Since adopting the policy in 2001, the Recreation Division has successfully met or exceeded the cost recovery targets for both youth and adult fee-based programs. This report recommends two MEETING DATE: December 3, 2019
ITEM NO. 4.6(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(b)--Approve revisions to City Council Policy 806: Recreation Classes and Fees
Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2019_Dec 3 Staff Report Regarding Rec Fee Policy (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806) Report to Redding City Council November 20, 2019
Re: 4.6(b)--Approve Revision to City Council Policy 806 - Recreation Classes and Fees Page 2 major changes: an increase in the cost recovery percentage and exempting free programs from the policy.

Fees and affordability

Affordable recreation programs are vitally important to establishing and maintaining the quality of life in a community for citizens who experience barriers that limit their opportunities.

Community recreation programs provide a social outlet to seniors and provide a refuge of safety for at-risk youth. For generations, Redding Recreation has provided high quality camps, sports leagues, and classes to Redding’s youth, teens, adults, and seniors.

In April of 2016, the State of California approved a $15 per hour minimum wage to be achieved with seven annual increases until arriving at $15 per hour in January 2022. As of January of 2020, minimum wages will go to $13 per hour.

In light of the increases in the minimum wage, an analysis of projected program expenses was conducted. The impact of the scheduled wage increases averages 8 percent annually. Since FYE 2015, direct labor costs for Recreation programs increased by $51,540 or approximately 17 percent, making it difficult to continue to meet policy targets without raising participant fees significantly and risking a decline in program participation. Raising participation fees by the same percentages would create a significant barrier to entry for many Redding residents.

Reduced participation does not directly correlate to lower costs, as minimum staffing levels are required to run many programs and can lead to higher overall costs with a lower recovery rate.

Multiple studies show that recreation programs positively impact communities in a variety of ways; from reduced youth crime rates, promotion of active and healthy lifestyles, and providing social connectivity in a safe environment for all age groups. Redding Recreation has built and earned a reputation for high quality, affordable programs over many decades.

Cost recovery percentage

The policy calls for program fees to be set as a percentage of direct program costs. Direct program costs are defined specifically as the materials, supplies, and part-time personnel costs required to conduct the specific class or program. Administration personnel, facilities, and overhead costs are not included in the cost recovery.

Staff is recommending a modest 5 percent increase in the cost recovery percentage for both youth and adults - from 85 to 90 percent for youth and 100 to 105 percent for adults.

Conservative projections of anticipated direct costs and revenue for both youth and adult programs indicate that proposed policy targets can be met if the free programs described below are removed from the recovery calculations.

In addition to the program fee, Recreation Division participants pay a Technology Surcharge Fee of 5 percent on all fee-based programs since its adoption in November 2010 which covers costs for technology-related expenses such as the registration software and various marketing and design expenses.

Free programs

Clearly, free programs don’t generate revenue. However, the direct costs to provide free Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2019_Dec 3 Staff Report Regarding Rec Fee Policy (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806) Report to Redding City Council November 20, 2019
Re: 4.6(b)--Approve Revision to City Council Policy 806 - Recreation Classes and Fees Page 3 programs such as those at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center, the Junior Giants youth baseball, Fantasy Fountain spray park, and senior fitness classes at the Senior Citizens Hall have historically been included in the overall cost recovery calculations.

• The Martin Luther King, Jr. Center has served the community since 1969. The Center serves disadvantaged and at-risk youth through an array of enrichment and academic programs. The annual cost is approximately $140,000.

• Junior Giants provides a free, non-competitive and coed baseball program for youth ages 5- 13, offering equipment, uniforms, program incentives, and coaches training. Redding Recreation has offered this program since its inception in 1994, currently reaching over 450 youth annually.

The San Francisco Giants Foundation provides a significant amount of in-kind materials to the program and requires that there be no fee to play. The annual cost is approximately $12,000.

• The exercise classes offered three times a week at the Senior Citizens Hall sees nearly 50 senior participants per class. The annual cost is approximately $4,000.

• Fantasy Fountain is the community’s free water spray park located in Enterprise Park. This open water attraction has multiple spray features and an erupting volcano, keeping kids active, entertained and cool during Redding’s hot summer months. The cost is approximately $3,000.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
City Council Policy 806-Final
City Council Policy 806-Redline
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2019_Dec 3 Staff Report Regarding Rec Fee Policy (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Recreation Classes and Program Fees

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-108 806 6-5-01 1
C:\users\nboster\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\[email protected]\work\att achments\11352.docx

BACKGROUND
The City of Redding Recreation Division offers more than 350 classes and programs to more than 13,000 participants annually. Changes in wages and participation rates directly affect the cost of providing these programs. In order to maintain a cost-recovery ratio that is reasonable, and within budgeted funds, flexibility is needed to make adjustments as needed.

PURPOSE
To establish a policy for the rate at which City recreation programs should be recovering direct costs and to provide staff authority to make adjustments to fees when program costs or revenues change.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City Council that:
1) Youth recreation class/program fees are set at a rate to target a ninety percent (90%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program.
2) Adult recreation class/program fees are set at a rate to target one hundred five percent (105%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 3) Free programs including, but not limited to, those conducted at the Martin Luther King Jr.

Center, the Junior Giants baseball program, open play at Fantasy Fountain, and fitness classes at the Senior Citizens Hall are excluded.

PROCEDURE
As the class/program roster is established in the months prior to the schedule being published, staff will review attendance and costs of prior programs, evaluate current costs and set a class/program fee projected to recover the appropriate percentage based on activity. Quarterly, staff will review actual fee recovery experience to monitor compliance.

Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2019_Dec 3 Staff Report Regarding Rec Fee Policy (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL POLICY

SUBJECT
Recreation Classes and Program Fees

RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-108 806 6-5-01 1
S:\Recreation\Fee Policy\City Council Policy 806_Redline.docx

BACKGROUND
The City of Redding Recreation Division offers more than 350 classes and programs to more than 813,000 participants annually. Changes in wages and participation rates directly affect the cost of providing these programs. In order to maintain a cost -recovery ratio that is reasonable, and within budgeted funds, flexibility is needed to make adjustments as needed. Historically, the class and program fees are approved annually with the master fee schedule.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City Council that:
1) Youth recreation class/program fees be set at a rate to target a ninety eighty-five percent (9085%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 2) Adult recreation class/program fees be set at a rate to target one hundred five percent (105-0%) recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. 3) Free programs including, but not limited to, those conducted at the Martin Luther King Jr.

Center, the Junior Giants baseball program, open play at Fantasy Fountain, and fitness classes at the Senior Citizens Hall are excluded.

Direct costs are defined as materials, supplies, and part-time personnel costs required to conduct the specific class or program. Administration personnel, and overhead costs, and facilities are not included.

PROCEDURE
As the class/program roster is established in the months prior to the schedule being published, staff will review attendance and costs of prior programs, evaluate current costs and set a class/program fee projected to recover the appropriate percentage based on activity. Quarterly, staff will review actual fee recovery experience to monitor compliance.

Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2019_Dec 3 Staff Report Regarding Rec Fee Policy (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy 806)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution confirming revisions to City Council Policy No. 806 – Recreation Classes and Program Fees as approved by the City Council at its meeting on December 3, 2019.

Fiscal Impact
Should the City Council (Council) adopt the resolution for the revised City Council Policy No. 806 Recreation Classes and Program Fees Policy, there will be no new expenses as the costs are currently incurred.

Alternative Action
The Council could decline to adopt the resolution modifying City Council Policy No. 806 or provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
The City Council approved policy revisions to City Council Policy No. 806 Recreation Classes and Program Fees Policy on December 3, 2019. The revisions included a five percent increase in the cost recovery percentage for both youth and adult classes and programs to account for a portion of the indirect costs, and exempted free programs such as the Martin Luther King Jr.

Center, the Junior Giants youth baseball program, Fantasy Fountain spray park, and senior fitness classes at the Senior Citizen Hall from the recovery calculations. To complete the action, a City Council resolution is required. The resolution is attached.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2019
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution confirming revisions to City Council Policy 806 - Recreation Classes and Program Fees.

Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2019_Dec 17 Staff Report Adopting Reso Confirming Revisions to Council Policy 806 (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy Report to Redding City Council December 11, 2019
Re: 4.6(a)--Revisions to Council Policy 806 - Recreation Classes and Fees Page 2  Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Resolution
City Council Policy 806-Final
City Council Policy 806-Redline
Previous Staff Report - December 3, 2019 (available online) Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2019_Dec 17 Staff Report Adopting Reso Confirming Revisions to Council Policy 806 (4.6(a)--Approve changes to Council Policy

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following relative to the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Accept update regarding the Project; and
(2) Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a fourfifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact
The South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project) will be funded by the City of Redding’s Water Utility. The current total project cost is $1,380,000. The Water Utility Division’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget has sufficient funds appropriated to complete the project.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project status report and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On February 4, 2025, Council adopted an emergency resolution for the project and authorized the negotiation of emergency contracts. The project proposes to replace and relocate the failed section of 12-inch, cast-iron water main and corrugated steel pipe casing in South Street that is beneath the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks by jack and boring a new steel pipe casing and installing a 16-inch, ductile iron pipe. Work also includes water main tie-in fittings, isolation valves, asphalt concrete pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk and other miscellaneous items.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Update for the Emergency Work for the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 191
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project Page 2 Staff has contracted with RTA Construction, Inc. (RTA) for the construction of the project based on their technical knowledge of utility construction and previous performance on projects of similar size and scope. Construction activities started on April 8, 2025, and are expected to be completed by August 15, 2025.

RTA has positively located UPRR’s existing underground utility along the eastern and western sides of the railroad tracks and have commenced work. RTA has completed the setup of the 24- hour traffic control plan through the area and have started on the jack and bore work to install the new 30-inch, steel casing and the installation of the new 16-inch, ductile iron pipe water main.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On February 4, 2025, the Council determined that the project is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15269(b)-Emergency Projects.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths affirmative vote, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and award an emergency public works contract for the project in an amount not to exceed $630,000;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $180,000;
(3) Approve $95,000 to cover costs for project development costs; (4) Approve $135,000 to cover costs for construction management and inspection fees; and (5) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact
The South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project (Project) is being funded by the City of Redding’s (City) Water Utility. The Water Utility’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget has sufficient funds appropriated to complete the project. The following table provides a summary of estimated costs for the project:

Cost Summary
Item Estimated Cost
Project Development Costs $95,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $810,000
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $135,000
Total Project Costs $1,040,000
MEETING DATE: February 4, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(g)--Consider declaring an emergency for the South Street Water Main at Railroad Emergency Replacement Project.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) Report to Redding City Council January 29, 2025
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the South Street Water Main ER Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead have staff prepare plans and specifications to award a contract to the low bidder in accordance with state and local contracting procedures. This would result in the broken water main remaining out of service through the summer of 2025 and during peak water demands which could significantly reduce reliability of the water system for City customers and fire flows in the area. Or, the Council could provide alterative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On December 9, 2024, a 12-inch, cast-iron, water main in South Street broke beneath the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks. The corrugated steel casing under the UPRR tracks that surrounds the water main also broke, resulting in erosion and voids beneath the railroad tracks.

City crews quickly made temporary repairs to close water valves and isolate the broken section of water main. They also backfilled voids in the soil caused by the break and coordinated with UPRR for repair of the railroad tracks in the area. The railroad tracks were quickly restored to normal operation, but because the pipeline break was beneath the tracks and the steel casing failed, City crews were unable to repair the water main and this segment of piping remains out of service.

Since both the water main and the casing failed beneath the railroad tracks, simply pulling a new pipe through the existing casing is not feasible. To adequately repair this main, staff intends to design for a jack and bore installation of a new steel casing and ductile iron water main, sized to convey peak flows in accordance with the City’s design standards, across the UPRR right-of-way for connection to the existing main piping on both sides.

Computer modeling of the City’s water system indicates that there should not be issues with the South Street water main remaining out of service through the winter and early spring, when water demands are relatively low. However, during the summer months and peak water demands, this main conveys significant flows eastward and its outage would have substantial impacts. If it remains out of service through the summer then peak flows would need to be conveyed through alternate routes and water mains, which will increase flow velocities, stress, and potential for surges and damage to other aging water mains in the downtown area.

If the South Street main remains out of service through the summer months, then there are several areas where increased flow velocities and potential for further pipeline damage are a concern. One, in particular, is another 12-inch water main crossing the UPRR tracks along Shasta Street, approximately one-half-mile north of the South Street water main break. The Shasta Street water main was installed in 1958 and is a cast iron pipe, similar to the South Street main that broke. The City has plans to replace the Shasta Street main with a separate capital improvement project in the near future because of concerns with its reliability. Recently, on June 19, 2024, it also had a break, just three blocks west of its railroad crossing. With the South Street water main out of service, flows through the Shasta Street main would increase to velocities above the maximum allowed by many agencies and recommended maximum in the City’s Water Master Plan. The increased flow velocities would lead to additional stress and potential for surges in the Shasta Street main that will increase the risk of additional failures.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) Report to Redding City Council January 29, 2025
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the South Street Water Main ER Project Page 3 The South Street water main provides critical redundancy for the Shasta Street main and other water mains in the area. While the South Street main remains out of service, this critical redundancy is not available. The lack of redundancy, combined with the increased velocities and stress to other aging mains where there are already concerns of reliability, including in Shasta Street, put the City at a much higher risk for additional water main failures that would have major impacts on the water system.

To provide necessary redundancy in the water system and mitigate the risks of additional pipeline breaks, disruptions in service, potential damage to infrastructure and property, and a loss of available storage and fire flow, staff recommends that the South Street Main be repaired as soon as possible and before the high water demands in the summer of 2025. Staff has considered proceeding with typical design and bid process for a capital improvement project; however, this process would likely require a minimum of seven months in order to prepare the bid package, obtain UPRR permits, advertise for bids, and award a contract for construction. At that point, the contractor would still need to order and procure materials, which would result in the construction work not starting until late 2025. This timeline is substandard and the repairs would not be completed prior to the high impact and risk period during the summer.

The broken water main presents potential impacts to public health, property and safety.

Therefore, staff proposes an emergency contract to repair and replace the broken water main in South Street beneath the UPRR crossing. If approved, staff estimates the construction will be complete in May 2025, before the high water demands in the summer and greatest risks occur.

It is noted that the Public Contract Code (PCC) (Section 20168) provides that the local government’s legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the PCC (Section 22050) provides that “in case of emergency, a public agency, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts.”
It is in the public’s interest and necessity to repair the broken water main in South Street to ensure reliability of the water system, protection of property and the public’s health and safety.

The attached Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects. Section 15269(b) includes emergency repairs to publicly and privately-owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. The emergency repair and replacement will occur in areas of previous disturbance, and the repairs are necessary to maintain service essential to public health.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) Report to Redding City Council January 29, 2025
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the South Street Water Main ER Project Page 4 Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REDDING TO DECLARE AN EMERGNCY AND AUTHORIZE THE

CITY MANAGER TO AWARD EMERGENCY CONTRACTS FOR THE

SOUTH STREET WATER MAIN AT RAILROAD EMERGENCY

REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code 4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2024, a 12-inch water main in South Street broke beneath the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks; and
WHEREAS, City crews isolated the broken segment of piping but are unable to repair it, due to its location under the UPRR tracks, and the pipe remains out of service; and WHEREAS, proper water infrastructure is critical for public health, safety, and fire protection; and
WHEREAS, if not repaired before high water demands during the summer months, there will be a lack of redundancy in the water system that will result in higher flow velocities, stress, and potential for surges in other water mains, increasing potential for additional pipeline failures; and WHEREAS, additional pipeline failures would result in disruptions in service, potential damage to associated public and adjacent private infrastructure, and a significant decrease in available water storage and fire flows; and
WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids is anticipated to require at least seven (7) months to design, advertise for bids, and award a contract for construction, after which construction would not occur until the autumn of 2025, failing to complete the necessary repairs until after the summer and highest risk period for additional pipeline damage or failures, water pressure losses, and deficient fire flows; and
WHEREAS, continued outage of the water main will significantly reduce the reliability of water systems to provide adequate pressures and fire flows, which threatens the safety of the public and properties in the downtown area; and
WHEREAS, the continued isolation and outage of the broken water main in South Street to accommodate the delay necessary for the competitive bidding process would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the water conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the water system.

3. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore declares an emergency and authorizes the City Manager to award emergency contracts to repair the broken water main in South Street at the UPRR crossing.

4. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 4th day of February, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project) APPROVED Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Update for Emergency Repair to South Street Water Main ER Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 (Job No. 2712), Replace Asphalt Concrete (AC) Surfacing 2024 Project, awarded to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,115,664.48.

Fiscal Impact
Streets Division funding in the amount of $1,901,850 and Solid Waste Division funding in the amount of $416,000 totaling $2,317,850 were approved for this Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project (Project). The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration is $2,115,664.48.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project as satisfactorily complete and provide staff alternative direction.

Background
As of December 16, 2024, J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. has completed all work items of the project which was within the adjusted contract time frame following weather delays and additional work. Subsequently, the Public Works Department filed a notice of completion with Shasta County. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date.

On June 4, 2024, the Council awarded a construction contract to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. for $1,773,377 and approved a $180,000 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $199,400 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $122,000 for project development costs. The City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $25,000. The MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 201
Report to Redding City Council May 23, 2025
Re: 4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project Page 2 total authorized amount for the project was $2,299,777. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services. During construction, there were three change orders in the amount of $125,787.48 leaving a balance of $54,212.52 in the contingency fund. The final project cost was $2,115,664.48.

The project involved removing and replacing approximately 110,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete in worn and deteriorated sections of Airport Road, Oasis Road, Quartz Hill Road, Twin View Boulevard and the Solid Waste Transfer Station as well as appropriate traffic control, striping, and pavement markings as required.

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $122,000.00 $122,000.00
Construction Contract +
Contingency $1,953,377.00
Construction Contract +
Contract Change Orders $1,899,164.48
Contract Administration &
Inspection $199,400.00 $94,500.00
Additional City Manager
Authority $25,000.00 $0.00
Total $2,299,777.00 $2,115,664.48
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. On June 4, 2024, the Council determined that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Replace AC Surfacing 2024-Location Map
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 202
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: ^Replace AC Surfacing 2024-Location Map (4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5474 (Job No. 2712), Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2024:
(1) Award to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc, in the amount of $1,773,377; (2) Approve $199,400 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) Approve $122,000 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $180,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $25,000; (6) Approve the project design plans, specifications, and special provisions; and (7) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2024 Project is funded by the Streets Division ($1,901,850) and the Solid Waste Division ($416,000). Project cost components are estimated, and some shifting of the funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 122,000.00
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 1,953,377.00
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 199,400.00 Additional City Manager Authority $ 25,000.00
Total Project Costs $ 2,299,777.00
Project Budget $ 2,317,850.00
MEETING DATE: June 4, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5474 (Job No. 2712) Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2024 Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project) Report to Redding City Council May 23, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2024 Project Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to award the project or provide alternate direction to staff. If the project does not move forward, the streets will continue to deteriorate and may require roadway reconstruction.

Background/Analysis
This project involves removing and replacing approximately 110,000 cubic feet of asphalt concrete pavement in worn and deteriorated sections of Oasis Road, Twin View Boulevard, Quartz Hill Road and Airport Road. The project includes other associated work items that include: pavement delineation, pavement markings, pavement markers, and other miscellaneous items. The project also includes removal and replacement of worn asphalt concrete pavement at the City of Redding’s Transfer Station as a result of the daily heavy truck traffic.

Attached is a tabulation of the three bids opened on May 15, 2024. The low bid in the amount of $1,773,377 was received from J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., of Redding. The engineer’s estimate was $1,777,867. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $122,000.

Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (design support).

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 (c). Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. The project will extend the life of the existing pavement, but will not create additional vehicle capacity or result in expansion of use.

The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^NOE
^Bid Tab

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project) APPROVED Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024 Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

REPLACE AC SURFACING 2024
Bid Schedule No.: 5474
J.F. Shea Construction Inc Darren Taylor Construction Inc 4/12/2024 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $163,800.00 $163,800.00 $100,717.60 $100,717.60 3 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3/4" CF 97720 $9.50 $928,340.00 $9.70 $947,884.00 $12.84 $1,254,724.80 4 Asphalt Concrete Overlay (3/4" PG 64-10) TON 1150 $90.00 $103,500.00 $115.00 $132,250.00 $155.20 $178,480.00 5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3/4" CF 21730 $14.50 $315,085.00 $11.50 $249,895.00 $15.66 $340,291.80 6 Shoulder Backing LF 1700 $4.00 $6,800.00 $7.00 $11,900.00 $10.77 $18,309.00 7 Digouts (3/4" PG 64-10) CF 4600 $14.80 $68,080.00 $13.00 $59,800.00 $11.81 $54,326.00 8 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (6") LF 73656 $1.75 $128,898.00 $1.75 $128,898.00 $1.50 $110,484.00 9 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (8") LF 756 $2.50 $1,890.00 $2.50 $1,890.00 $4.50 $3,402.00 10 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF 637 $16.00 $10,192.00 $16.00 $10,192.00 $18.00 $11,466.00 11 Pavement Markers EA 1561 $12.00 $18,732.00 $10.00 $15,610.00 $7.00 $10,927.00 12 Adjust Water Valve EA 35 $850.00 $29,750.00 $650.00 $22,750.00 $750.00 $26,250.00 13 Adjust Manhole EA 14 $1,200.00 $16,800.00 $917.00 $12,838.00 $1,000.00 $14,000.00 14 Adjust Monument EA 14 $1,200.00 $16,800.00 $905.00 $12,670.00 $1,200.00 $16,800.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $1,777,867.00 $1,773,377.00 $2,150,178.20

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $154,839.20 3 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3/4"
PG 64-10) CF 97720 $15.35 $1,500,002.00 $12.63
4 Asphalt Concrete Overlay (3/4" PG 64-10) TON 1150 $165.00 $189,750.00 $145.07 5 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (3/4"
PG 70-10) CF 21730 $18.50 $402,005.00 $15.22
6 Shoulder Backing LF 1700 $53.00 $90,100.00 $23.59
7 Digouts (3/4" PG 64-10) CF 4600 $22.00 $101,200.00 $15.60 8 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (6") LF 73656 $1.50 $110,484.00 $1.58 9 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (8") LF 756 $4.50 $3,402.00 $3.83 10 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF 637 $18.00 $11,466.00 $17.33 11 Pavement Markers EA 1561 $7.00 $10,927.00 $8.00
12 Adjust Water Valve EA 35 $550.00 $19,250.00 $650.00
13 Adjust Manhole EA 14 $1,100.00 $15,400.00 $1,005.67
14 Adjust Monument EA 14 $1,100.00 $15,400.00 $1,068.33 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $2,675,886.00 $2,199,813.73

ENGINEER'S EST
Stimpel-Wiebelhaus
Associates Inc

Page 1 of 1 ends

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(b)--Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5474 Replace AC Surfacing 2024

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize staff to reject all bids in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 20166 and Public Contract Code Section 22038 regarding Bid Negotiation No. 5469, Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project.

Fiscal Impact
The Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project (Project) is being funded by a Building Forward Grant from the California State Library. The grant funds are only available for specific improvements at the Burney Library. Project bids were opened on April 22, 2025, the low bid came in at $393,648 and the engineers estimate was $288,560. Therefore, the low bid is over the engineers estimate and the available grant funding. If all bids are rejected, the City of Redding (City) can re-evaluate the project scope and estimate and put it out to bid again.

Bidders will have the opportunity to submit bids which staff anticipates would be closer to the revised engineer’s estimate and project budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to reject all bids and accept the lowest responsive bid of $393,648. If the project is awarded to the bidder, the Community Services Department and General Fund will be burdened with funding an additional $105,000 for the contract.

Background/Analysis
On April 5, 2022, the Council authorized staff to apply for Building Forward Library Infrastructure Grant Program (Building Forward) funding on behalf of the Shasta Public Libraries. In October 2022, staff was notified that a grant was awarded for the Burney Library.

These funds were to be used solely for the improvements at the Burney Library, and included the following items of work – UV filter for HVAC, Generator, Roof, Security Cameras, and Solar.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project - Reject All Bids
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 209
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(c)--Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project - Reject All Bids Page 2
The generator, roof, and solar improvements were combined into a single project, while the security cameras and HVAC work are separate projects, respectively. The budget is very limited for the amount of improvements that are required per the grant, therefore, the City has requested a formal scope change from the program to remove some proposed items of work to help reduce the overall cost at the Burney Library. In addition, the plans for the roof, generator and solar project will be revised to allow for some additive alternates prior to re-advertising.

Attached is a tabulation of bids opened on April 22, 2025. The only bid received was from SnL Group, Inc. of Redding, California in the amount of the $393,648. The project plans and estimate were prepared for the City by a consultant. Their engineer’s estimate was $288,560. The Contractor’s bid is 36 percent higher than the engineer’s estimate. The Building Forward grant and the City’s General Fund do not have additional funding to contribute to the project.

In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 20166 and Public Contract Code Section 22038, the Council has the discretion to reject all bids. Staff, therefore, has determined that the best course of action would be to reject all bids, re-evaluate and re-bid the project.

Environmental Review
This activity, rejection of bids, is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Bid Tab
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 210
BID TABULATION FOR:

BURNEY LIBRARY ROOF REPLACEMENT SOLAR & GENERATOR ADDITION Bid Schedule No.: 5469

ENGINEER'S EST
4/22/2025 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 2 EXCAVATE GENERATOR FOUNDATION
AND INSTALL ENGINEERED FILL LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 3 REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 4 ROOF WOOD FRAMING AND SHEATHING SF 774 $22.00 $17,028.00 $62.00 $47,988.00 5 PVC ROOF SF 1320 $28.50 $37,620.00 $50.00 $66,000.00
6 COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOF SF 4070 $19.00 $77,330.00 $8.00 $32,560.00 7 PV ARRAY RACKING LS 1 $12,400.00 $12,400.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 8 GENERATOR LS 1 $52,000.00 $52,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 9 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH LS 1 $6,587.00 $6,587.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 10 PANELBOARD LS 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 11 CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS LS 1 $22,500.00 $22,500.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 12 PHOTOVOLTAIC INVERTER LS 1 $10,045.00 $10,045.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 13 PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL EA 26 $675.00 $17,550.00 $850.00 $22,100.00 TOTAL BASE BID $393,648.00
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1
1 METAL TRIM LS 1 $9,190.00 $9,190.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2
1 ROOF HEAT TAPE LF 730 $15.00 $10,950.00 $70.00 $51,100.00 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 3
1 CONTINUOUS ROOFING RIDGE VENT LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 TOTAL - BASE BID PLUS ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1,2,3 $313,700.00 $477,748.00 SnL Group, Inc.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(c)--Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project - Reject All Bids)

CITYOFREDDING

REPORTTOTHECITYCOUNCIL
MEETING DATE: April5, 2022 FROM: KimNiemer, Community
ITEM NO. 4.6(a) Services Director
APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Authorize aGrantApplication totheCalifornia State Library Recommendation
Authorize thefollowing relative totheBuilding Forward Library Infrastructure Program:
1) Authorize stafftoapply fortheBuilding Forward Library Infrastructure Program grant administered bytheCalifornia State Library onbehalf oftheShasta Public Libraries, for anamount upto $3,000,000; and
2) Authorize theCityManager toexecute alldocuments necessary toapply forthegrant, appropriate funds should thegrantbeawarded, andexecute anyagreements necessary to implement thegrant ifawarded.

Fiscal Impact
Thegrant application willrequest upto $3,000,000toaddress lifesafety andother critical maintenance needs attheShasta Public Libraries. Thegrant program doesnotrequire acostsharing match. There isnoadditional impact totheGeneral Fund.

Alternative Action
TheCityCouncil (Council) could decline toapply forthefunds underthisgrant opportunity or provide staffwithalternative direction.

Background/Analysis
TheBudgetActof2021 (SB129) allocated $439million inone-timefunds totheCalifornia State Library toaddress thelifesafety andcritical maintenance needsofpublic library facilities throughout California. Thiscompetitive grant program prioritizes funding forlocal library facilities located ineconomically disadvantaged areasofthestate. Themaximum grant amount perlibrary facility is $10million.

Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project - Reject All Bids) R-- 2
Since 2006, theCityofRedding ( City) hasmanaged theShasta Public Libraries (Libraries) under anagreement withShasta County andtheCityofAnderson. TheCitypartners with Library Systems andServices tomanage thelibrary operations atthethree locations Anderson, Burney, andRedding. TheLibraries arewell-utilized public spaces thattakeafairamount of wearandteardaily. Theexperiences ofthelastfewyearswithwildfires andCOVID-19 have demonstrated theneedtokeeptheLibraries openandaccessible whenever needed.

Staff members fromtheLibraries andtheCommunity Services Department collaborated to identify facility needs anddevelop the project scope andestimates. Allthree locations have eligible needs underthisprogram, including, butnotlimited to: newroofsandsolar systems for Burney andAnderson; enhanced UVfiltration fortheHVAC systems, back-upgenerators, and security cameras atallthree locations; andnewcarpet attheRedding Library. Shasta County has agreed tohave theCitysubmit andimplement theprojects inAnderson andBurney, ifthegrant isawarded. Thiscoordination willallowtheprojects tobebidtogether andhopefully yieldmore competitive pricing.

Taking therecommended action atthistimewillallowtheCityofRedding tocompete forfunds toaddress lifesafety andothercritical maintenance needs attheShasta Public Libraries.

Council Priority/CityManager Goals
Budget andFinancial Management - yearFinancial
Economic Development
inRedding tocreate jobs, retain current businesses andattract newones, andencourage Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(c)--Burney Library Roof Replacement, Solar and Generator Addition Project - Reject All Bids)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following relative to the funding of the City of Redding Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the State Water Resources Control Board Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program from $40 million to $50 million;
(2) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act Loan Program from $25 million to $40 million; and
(3) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the U.S.

Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) from $6 million to $8 million.

Fiscal Impact
The total costs for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) are currently estimated to be approximately $73 million. The Engineer’s construction cost estimate has increased substantially since the early design phases and is now nearly double the previous estimates from September 2023, when City Council (Council) approved the applications for several grants and loans for the project. Estimated construction costs have increased due to cost escalation, an increase in the pump station building footprint and screen intake sizes, also from what appears to be low cost estimates by the design consultant in previous design phases. Staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the City of Redding’s (City) Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. To date, the Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $17 million for the project. In the future, as opportunities are MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve Increases to Grant and Loan Request Amounts to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 215
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant Page 2 identified, staff may request Council approval for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to increase the funding request amounts for these loan and grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1, located within the Sacramento River, will be completely replaced and relocated upriver because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. For additional background and details concerning the project, please refer to the previous staff reports attached.

On September 19, 2023, March 21, 2024, and April 1, 2025, Council approved the City as an applicant for five grants and two loans associated with the project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as well as loans administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). A summary of the grant and loan applications that Council has approved to date, as well as the increased request amounts recommended herein, are provided in Table 1.

Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Approved
Request
Amount
Revised
Request
Amount Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program
Grant 9/19/2023 $2 M Submitted Pre-App.

Not Selected.

WCB - Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/19/2023 $5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS - Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/19/2023 $25 M
Preparing
Application.

SWRCB – Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund Loan 9/19/2023 $40 M $50 M
Submitted app.

Coordinating with
SWRCB.

Water Infrastructure Finance
& Innovation Act Loan 3/21/2024 $25 M $40 M Finalizing application.

FHWA- Culvert Aquatic
Organism Passage Grant 3/21/2024 $6 M $8 M Submitted app. Awaiting response.

CDFW – Fisheries Restoration
Grant Program Grant 4/1/2025 $6 M Submitted app. Awaiting response.

Previous Total
(Council Approved to Date): $109 M
Revised Total
(if Approved by Council) $136 M
Packet Pg. 216
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant Page 3 The City’s funding request amounts through these loan and grant programs were determined based on funding program limits and estimated project costs. Since the estimated project costs have increased significantly since the Council approved the applications for these grants and loans, it is recommended that funding request amounts be increased for the two low-interest loans, which could be the primary funding source(s) for the project, and the FHWA grant that could fund the Jenny Creek restoration work included in the project.

The City applied for a low-interest Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan through SWRCB in December of 2023 for $40 million, slightly above total estimated project costs at that time. The City’s application and environmental documents are still under review and the City is coordinating with SWRCB. The DWSRF program allows for applications up to $50 million and staff recommends that the application amount be increased to this maximum allowed, based on the current cost estimate for the project.

Staff intends to apply for a Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan through the EPA this summer. The maximum loan request amount through the WIFIA loan program is 49 percent of the total project cost. On March 21, 2024, the Council approved application for up to $25 million through this program, well over 49 percent of the estimated costs at that time. The recommended increase to $40 million is slightly above 49 percent of the current estimated cost.

On March 21, 2024, the Council approved application for up to $6 million through the FHWA Culvert AOP Program for the Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project (described in the May 21, 2024 staff report). The City applied for a grant in September of 2024 and the application is still under review. The recommended increase to $8 million is due to the increased cost estimate.

All of the grant and loan programs noted above are competitive and it is unknown at this point which programs will award funds for the project or how much will be awarded. Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, that could benefit the project and reduce costs to the Utility.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. On April 22, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and upon conclusion adopted Resolution number 2025-01 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-2025-00478), thereby adopting the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and approved Use Permit Application UP-2024-01017 for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023
Packet Pg. 217
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant Page 4 Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024
Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025
Packet Pg. 218
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.

On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.

The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.

The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.

The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.

City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.

2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.

Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.

MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).

In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.

City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.

City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.

Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.

Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.

After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:

This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.

Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.

PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:

Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.

JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.

JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.

One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.

The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.

Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.

Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.

Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.

Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.

Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.

JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.

JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.

The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to submit a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act loan application in an amount not to exceed $25 million;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to submit U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) application in an amount not to exceed $6 million with a 20 percent local match of $1.2 million; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the loan and grant submittal process and if awarded loan or grant funds, appropriate the funds, negotiate terms, if any and execute any agreements to implement either the loan or grant.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $46 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The Project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the Project to date.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Low-Interest Loan to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under the Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan program or the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) grant and provide staff with alternative direction.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component in the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937 and has been in continual service since, with modifications and upgrades performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989. Staff plans to completely replace and relocate PS01 because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. The replacement station will be relocated approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing location to a deeper pool in the river. The new station will also have increased capacity to meet anticipated future demands, with proposed firm capacity of 42 million gallons per day (MGD) compared to its current capacity of 29 MGD. Project construction is anticipated to start in 2026 with completion expected in 2027 or 2028.

The new PS01 will be located adjacent to the confluence of Jenny Creek to the Sacramento River, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek during the construction of the Project. Jenny Creek is currently conveyed through two culverts beneath the Sacramento River Trail. The culverts are failing and their outlets are typically above the Sacramento River level preventing fish passage, so restoration of Jenny Creek is a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will need to perform at some point. The Jenny Creek restoration work will remove the culverts and restore the open channel, and provide two new bridges for trail access in the area. It will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead from the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the Project.

Jacobs was selected to provide professional consulting services for the Project, including a preliminary design report, environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the project. Within its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying grant and loan opportunities and applying for grants. If application for the WIFIA loan and Culvert AOP Program Grant are approved by the Council, then Jacobs will assist staff with the applications.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
On September 7, 2023, the Council approved the City as an applicant for three grants and one loan associated with the Project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), and a loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A summary of the grants and loans that Council has approved applications for to date, and those that are requested for Council approval herein are provided in Table 1.

Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/7/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.

WCB- Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/7/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS- Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/7/23 $25 M $1.5 M Awaiting next
application cycle.

SWRCB- State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan 9/7/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $72 M $3.6 M
WIFIA Loan Pending $25 M Low
Interest
FHWA- Culvert AOP Grant Pending $6 M $1.2 M
Total: $103 M $4.8 M

1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans.

Although the approved request total of $72 million and the total request of $103 million in the table above is much higher than the expected project cost of $46 million, it is unknown which of these funding sources will actually be awarded. The City was not selected for the USFWS National Fish Passage Program and there may be a high level of competition with the other programs. In addition, the eligible project costs through the NMFS grant are probably closer to $5 million (lower than the approved request limit of $25 million shown above), so the maximum funding that could come from the applications that Council has approved to date is likely closer to a maximum of $50 million.

Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the Project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, if approved by the Council, that could benefit the Project and reduce costs to the Utility. If the City is fortunate and is awarded funding from grants or loans in excess of the project costs, then the Utility will utilize funding that will minimize its long-term costs. The Utility’s preferred funding sources are ranked from highest to lowest in the following Table 2.

Funding sources at the top would be utilized over sources at the bottom, as available.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
Table 2- Preferred Funding Source Ranking
Rank Grant/Loan Program Reasons for Ranking
1 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(Principal Forgiveness, 0% interest)
No local match or interest.
2 Grant Programs No interest, but local match will likely be needed. 3 Water Utility Funds Insufficient funds for Project costs, but avoids loan interests.
4 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(with low interest rate)
Very low interest rates.
5 WIFIA Loan Interest rates likely higher than State Revolving Fund.

The WIFIA loan, which staff is requesting approval for application, is ranked the lowest of the identified funding options, but it could still be a good option to fund the Project if the other funding sources will not cover all Project costs. Staff’s intent, if Council approves, is to proceed with the initial steps for the WIFIA loan as a contingency plan to avoid project delays in the event that the other funding options do not become available.

The WIFIA program does not provide grants, but it still has a number of features and flexibilities that make it preferable to municipal revenue bonds and other loan programs for water, wastewater, and stormwater capital projects. Benefits include repayment period flexibility, low interest rates, an opportunity for a one-time renegotiation of the rate to a lower rate during the project implementation period, and lower initial costs/fees than municipal bonds. The repayment period for a WIFIA loan can be up to 35 years and the WIFIA program allows for the opportunity to delay the start of the repayment period up to five years after substantial completion of construction. Interest rates for WIFIA loans are set on the date the loan is closed and based on the U.S. Treasury State & Local Government Series interest rate for a comparable maturity. Interest rates are typically lower than municipal bond rates and currently the rate for a long-term WIFIA loan is approximately 4.4 percent.

The WIFIA loan program includes a two-part application process. If authorized by the Council, staff will proceed with part one of the process, which involves submitting a Letter of Interest to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the EPA selects the Project, then the City would be invited to proceed to part two of the process and apply for the loan. EPA only selects projects that it expects will proceed to closing. If the City were to proceed to part two of the process and submit a full application, then the City would be required to pay EPA an initial application review fee of $100,000 at the time of the application to cover costs for EPA’s external contractors’ (legal, financial and technical) review costs. When the loan is finalized the City would be required to pay the actual costs for EPA’s outside contractors, which are expected to total $100,000 to $150,000, including the initial review fee. The Utility Fund would pay for the application review fees, if necessary, and these review costs could be included in the loan.

Staff intends to proceed with part one of the process, which does not require any fees, and then await responses from the State Revolving Fund and grant applications prior to proceeding with Phase 2 of the WIFIA process and paying any fees, if selected and necessary.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 5
The WIFIA program has a rolling selection process with funding available on an ongoing basis.

It announced in its Fiscal Year 2023 Notices of Funding Availability that up to $7.5 billion of financing will be available. The need for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and the public benefits that it will provide should make it a good candidate for EPA selection for a loan through its WIFIA program.

FHWA’s Culvert AOP Program is a competitive grant program that awards approximately $200 million in grants annually for projects that replace, remove, and repair culverts or weirs and meaningfully improve or restore fish passage for anadromous fish. It provides grants up to $50 million and would require a 20 percent non-federal match. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the Project meets the selection criteria and makes the Project a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.

Environmental Review
Applying for a loan or grant funding is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The design and environmental technical studies are currently under way for the Pump Station 1 Project. These studies will provide the information necessary to ensure CEQA compliance prior to construction.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City of Redding to submit an application in an amount not to exceed $6 million to the Fisheries Restoration Grant Program administered by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in partnership with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund; and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the grant, should it be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are currently estimated to be approximately $55 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the City’s Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the project to date.

If the City Council (Council) approves the California Department of Fish and Wildlife - Fisheries Restoration Grant Program (FRGP) application and funding is awarded for the project, then the FRGP funds could provide for roughly 10 percent of the project costs. In the future, as opportunities are identified, staff may request Council approval for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project.

MEETING DATE: April 1, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Fisheries Restoration Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council March 25, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for FRGP funds and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 will be completely replaced and relocated upriver because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. For additional background and details concerning the project, please refer to the previous staff reports attached.

On September 19, 2023, and March 21, 2024, the Council approved the City as an applicant for four grants and two loans associated with the project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, as well as loans administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A summary of the grant and loan applications Council has approved to date, including the subject FRGP grant, are provided in Table 1.

WCB - Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/19/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS - Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/19/23 $25 M $1.5 M Preparing
Application.

SWRCB - State Revolving
Fund Loan 9/19/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Water Infrastructure Finance
&
Innovation Act
Loan 3/21/24 $25 M Low
Interest
Finalizing
application.

U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal
Highway Administration
Culvert Aquatic Organism
Passage
Grant 3/21/24 $6 M $1.2 M Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $103 M $4.8 M
CDFW - FRGP Grant Pending $6 M $0
Total: $109 M $4.8 M

1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council March 25, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
All of the grant and loan programs listed above are competitive and it is unknown at this point which programs will award funds for the project or how much will be awarded. Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, that could benefit the project and reduce costs to the Utility.

The FRGP is a competitive grant program that has $17 million available this cycle for projects that restore, enhance, or protect anadromous salmonid habitat in watersheds of California. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project, further described in the May 13, 2024 staff report, meets the FRGP selection criteria and the project should be a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023
Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under the Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan program or the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) grant and provide staff with alternative direction.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component in the City’s water supply system.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
On September 7, 2023, the Council approved the City as an applicant for three grants and one loan associated with the Project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), and a loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A summary of the grants and loans that Council has approved applications for to date, and those that are requested for Council approval herein are provided in Table 1.

WCB- Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/7/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS- Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/7/23 $25 M $1.5 M Awaiting next
application cycle.

SWRCB- State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan 9/7/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $72 M $3.6 M
WIFIA Loan Pending $25 M Low
Interest
FHWA- Culvert AOP Grant Pending $6 M $1.2 M
Total: $103 M $4.8 M

1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans.

Funding sources at the top would be utilized over sources at the bottom, as available.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
Table 2- Preferred Funding Source Ranking
Rank Grant/Loan Program Reasons for Ranking
1 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(Principal Forgiveness, 0% interest)
No local match or interest.
2 Grant Programs No interest, but local match will likely be needed. 3 Water Utility Funds Insufficient funds for Project costs, but avoids loan interests.
4 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(with low interest rate)
Very low interest rates.
5 WIFIA Loan Interest rates likely higher than State Revolving Fund.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 5
The WIFIA program has a rolling selection process with funding available on an ongoing basis.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025 (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333):
(1) Adopt Resolution summarily vacating Public Service Easement “B” within Parcel 4 of Parcel Map (PM-2016-00771) as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B; (2) Find the action consistent with the General Plan; and (3) Find the action categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15035 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations.

Fiscal Impact
Adopting the Resolution will have no fiscal impact.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the Resolution and leave the Public Service Easement in place.

Background/Analysis
Parcel Map PM-2016-00771 dedicated 20-foot-wide Public Service Easement “B” (PSE) across Parcel 4 to accommodate an 18” Storm Drain Pipe. The owner of Parcel 4 has submitted an application for abandonment of the PSE in order to accommodate proposed improvements that would encroach upon the PSE. The owner has agreed to take responsibility for all maintenance of the drainage facilities and to keep them free and clear of obstructions.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Resolution Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025- 00333)
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 372
Report to Redding City Council May 28, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333) Page 2 The PSE can be determined to be excess and eligible for summary vacation per Streets and Highways Code 8333 as the facilities are now considered to be private. The summary vacation of the PSE is consistent with the General Plan as it will reduce maintenance needs of public facilities; encourage design consistent with the surroundings; and will not preclude uses consistent with current zoning.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that the activity is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). The Class 5 exemption allows for minor alterations to land use limitations, as long as the average slope on site is less than 20 percent and would not result in any changes in land use or density. This action will not result in the creation of any new parcels, nor will it change land use density. The existing General Plan and Zoning land use designations would remain as they currently exist and the average slope does not exceed 20 percent. In addition, the project area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources. The action has no potential to have a significant impact on the environment.

The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
c: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Land Rights Services AT&T California
Charter Communication
Attachments
^Resolution
^NOE Summary Vacation_Goodwater
^Location Map
^Exhibit A
^Exhibit B
Packet Pg. 373
Recording Requested by
City of Redding
Please Return to
City Clerk
P.O. Box 496701
Redding, CA 96049-6071
Documentary Transfer Tax: None
City of Redding EXEMPT
Rev. & Tax C.A. §11922

NO FEE-CITY BUSINESS
Gov. Code §6103
APN 109-110-042
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING SUMMARILY VACATING THE CITY’S INTEREST IN PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT “B” WITHIN PARCEL 4 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP PM-2016- 00771, FILED MARCH 22, 2017 IN BOOK 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 46, SHASTA COUNTY RECORDS (ABANDONMENT APPLICATION A-2025-00333) WHEREAS:

A. Public Service Easement “B” being considered for summary vacation was acquired by dedication by Parcel Map PM-2016-00771 filed in Book 39 of Parcel Maps at Page 46, Shasta County Records and is described in Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” attached and made a part hereof by reference. The owner of the adjacent parcels has asked that the City vacate Public Service Easement “B.”
B. Storm drain facilities within Public Service Easement “B” are private; therefore, the Easement may be determined to be excess and eligible for summary vacation.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The recitals set forth above are true, correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 8333(c), the City Council determines Public Service Easement “B” to be excess and is unnecessary for present or prospective public use.

3. The City Council approves the request to summarily vacate Public Service Easement “B” within Parcel 4 as shown on Parcel Map PM-2016-00771 filed in Book 39 of Parcel Maps, Page 46, Shasta County Records, as described in Exhibit “A” and shown on the attached Exhibit “B.” Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333))

4. The vacation of Public Service Easement “B” is consistent with the General Plan. This action will:
reduce maintenance needs of public facilities; encourage design consistent with the surroundings and will not preclude uses consistent with current zoning.

5. The vacation of Public Service Easement “B” qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environment review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15305 – Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations. No changes in land use or density will occur and areas affected contain an average slope of less than 20%. There is no possibility that this action will have a significant impact on the environment.

6. The City Clerk is directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Vacation, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded in the Office of the Shasta County Assessor/Recorder.

I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ _____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333)) Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: ^NOE Summary Vacation_Goodwater (4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333)) Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333)) Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: ^Exhibit A (4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333)) Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: ^Exhibit B (4.11(e)--Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2025-00333))

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) - Schedule No. 5577 - Construction Inspection Services and Material Testing Services for the Eastside Road Bridge Over Olney Creek Project (Project):
(1) Award RFP to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $886,111.38 with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., to provide Construction Inspection and Material Testing Services for the Project; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract amendments not-to-exceed $50,000.

Fiscal Impact
The Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project (Project) is being funded by two sources which consist of the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and the City of Redding (City) Citywide Transportation Impact Fee Program (TIF). The HBP will fund 88.53 percent of the project while the remaining 11.47 percent will be through TIF. Since the bids were higher than the engineer’s estimated cost, staff will be working with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to obtain additional HBP funding for the project. Staff anticipates the HBP to fully fund its share of the project total costs based upon previous experience with other bridge HBP funded projects. Until those additional funds become available, the TIF will cover the costs above the estimate. Any additional HBP funds will be presented and budgeted in a separate resolution.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule Number 5577 and authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for Construction Inspection and Materials Testing Services for the Eastside Road Bridge Over Olney Creek Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 380
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to award this contact, in which case, City staff would be required to manage construction inspection and material services. This would require either consultant services to be solicited for other capital work or reduction in the City’s capital program delivery.

Background/Analysis
This project includes the replacement of the Eastside Road bridge over Olney Creek and the rehabilitation of the approach roadway. The work will include removal of the existing bridge in stages, construction of a new bridge over two summer seasons, construction of retaining walls, sidewalk, curb and gutter, utility relocation, roadway construction, and other miscellaneous items of work.

The project is currently recommencing construction activities after being in a long unanticipated project suspension. The City’s engineering staff will be overseeing approximately 20 projects this construction season and there is insufficient staff to provide construction inspection for a project of this magnitude and complexity without affecting the delivery of other projects. As such, consultant support is required.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
In March 2025, a formal Request for Proposals - No. 5577, outlining the specific scope of work, was advertised. Proposals were required to include a scope of work and proposed fee. Proposals and fee schedules were received on March 28, 2025, from three firms. A review and selection panel were formed with members from the Public Works Department. Based upon proposal review and experience, the panel ranked the firms as follows:

FIRM RANK
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Ghirardelli Associates
1 2
TRC Engineers, Inc. 3
Proposals were evaluated based on their understanding of the scope of work, ability to meet the proposed schedule and maintain the project budget, experience and qualifications of the proposed staff, ability to work with staff, project approach, familiarity with state and City of Redding procedures, and geographic location of the team. Applying the criteria to the proposals, the selection panel determined that Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (Consultant) was the best qualified firm to provide the required services for this project.

Packet Pg. 381
Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services Page 3 Following the evaluation and ranking, the consultant’s proposed fees were opened, evaluated, and negotiated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services as well as previous similar projects cost comparisons.

The consultant fee is estimated and the contract will be for actual work performed. However, staff recommends the approval of an additional $50,000 in contingency reserve. Contingency funds may be necessary due to unforeseen project issues including potential claims. If this reserve needs to be utilized, a contract amendment would be negotiated with the consultant and the contract would be modified with approval of the City Manager.

This contract has been approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On February 6, 2018, the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) and approved the project, thereby satisfying the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.

On March 1, 2018, Caltrans determined the project is categorically excluded from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, pursuant to 23 CFR 771.117(c): activity (c)(28) - Bridge Replacement.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Project Location Map
Contract
Caltrans_NEPA CE_Eastside at Olney Bridge 3-1-2018
Previous Staff Report 5-17-2022
Previous Staff Report 2-6-2018
Packet Pg. 382

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

EXHIBIT A

EASTSIDE RD AT OLNEY CREEK BRIDGE

REPLACEMENT PROJECT PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

LOCATION

PROJECT
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: ^Project Location Map (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Contract (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services) Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Caltrans_NEPA CE_Eastside at Olney Bridge 3-1-2018 (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Caltrans_NEPA CE_Eastside at Olney Bridge 3-1-2018 (4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection

Redding City CouncilJune 3, 2025

Redding City Council
June 3, 2025