Redding City Council
February 17, 2026

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA
February 17, 2026
6:00 PM
This meeting will include teleconference participation by Mayor Pro Tempore Erin Resner (Government Code Section 54953). In addition to the meeting location above, members of the public may participate in the meeting from the following teleconference location:

Courtyard Marriott Scottsdale Lobby
5201 N Pima Road
Scottsdale Arizona, 85250

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MIKE LITTAU
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Colin Duffy, Redding Nazarene Church
C. Roll Call

2. PRESENTATIONS
2A. Presentation of City of Redding Appreciation Clock to Joshua Divine for his service on the Community Services Advisory Commission from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2025.
2B. Presentation from Public Affairs Specialist Cynthia Cowell, on behalf of the U.S. Small Business Administration, regarding services provided to, and available to, County of Shasta and City of Redding residents regarding the December 2025 flood event.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please enter your name in the electronic kiosk located in the lobby. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.gov and in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council February 17, 2026

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please enter your name in the electronic kiosk located in the lobby before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation. 4(a). Approve City Council Minutes: Special Meeting – Closed Session of January 6, 2026; and Regular Meeting of January 6, 2026.
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 7; and Payroll Register Nos. 14 and 15.

4.4(a). Adopt Resolution approving adopting the 21st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $0 by utilizing personnel savings to fund the demolition of the subject property located at 825 Industrial Street, which has been the focus of prolonged City of Redding Code Enforcement efforts due to chronic nuisance conditions, multiple structure fires, advanced structural deterioration, repeated trespassing, and significant public safety concerns.

4.9(a). Approve ratification of submission of a grant application to the California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program in the amount of $689,226.09; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant agreement and all subsequent documentations and to administratively appropriate the award.

4.11(a). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project (Project):
(1) Increase project budget by $1,200,000; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 25th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $1,200,000 of Citywide Transportation Impact Fee funds for the project.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted their name through the electronic kiosk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

Redding City Council February 17, 2026

4.11(b). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5470, Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Project:
(1) Reject the apparent low bid by JS Builders, Inc. as nonresponsive and award the project to the second low bidder JF Shea Construction, Inc., in the amount of $4,748,526;
(2) Approve an additional $712,200 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $985,000 for project development costs; (3) Approve $474,500 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 24th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $2,318,780 for the Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement project; increasing appropriation of federal grant funds by $267,360 and increasing appropriation of Transportation Impact Fee funds by $2,051,420.

4.11(c). Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to submit a grant application to the United States Department of Transportation for the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Grant Program in the amount of $25 million for the South Bonnyview Diverging Diamond Interchange and Corridor Capacity Improvement Project.

4.11(d). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5667, Oregon Street Improvements:
(1) Award the project to the lowest bidder, JF Shea Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,312,100;
(2) Approve an additional $151,900 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $351,750 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $131,200 to provide construction contingency funding; and (5) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $75,000.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

5. APPOINTMENTS

5.1. Consider Mayor's reappointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging.

Recommendation:

Accept the Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Michael Brokloff as the City of Redding Representative to the Shasta County Commission on Aging (COA) to serve a two-year term effective January 5, 2026, through January 3, 2028, pursuant to the Shasta County COA bylaws.

Redding City Council February 17, 2026

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
City Manager

9.1(a). Consider Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marking Group, Inc.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the Mayor to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc., outlining the cooperating framework to support the Ironman 70.3 branded endurance triathlon to take place in the City of Redding on August 16, 2026, August 15, 2027, and August 13, 2028; and (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $53,000 for Fiscal Year 2026- 27 to support the Ironman 70.3 event.

Electric Utility

9.5(a). Consider Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Recommendation:

Accept the City of Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Second Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

9.5(b). Consider setting a Public Hearing for March 3, 2026, regarding Redding Electric Utility rate increases.

Recommendation:

Approve setting a Public Hearing on March 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider increases in Redding Electric Utility rates (four and one-half percent increase per year) effective beginning with the April 1, 2026, billing cycle and continuing with the January 1, 2027, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2029, billing cycles, along with an increase to the Residential Energy Discount benefit for income-qualified households.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only
Redding City Council February 17, 2026

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: https://www.shastaartscouncil.org/scactv; and the City’s YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/cityofredding. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at https://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the Services tab, and select City Council Videos.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Presentation of City of Redding Appreciation Clock to Joshua Divine for his service on the Community Services Advisory Commission from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2025.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2A--Presentation to outgoing Community Services Advisory Commission (CSAC) Commissioner Joshua Divine.

Redding City Council
Packet Pg. 6

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Presentation from Public Affairs Specialist Cynthia Cowell, on behalf of the U.S. Small Business Administration, regarding services provided to, and available to, County of Shasta and City of Redding residents regarding the December 2025 flood event.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 2B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2B--Presentation from Small Business Administration Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 7

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve City Council Minutes: Special Meeting – Closed Session of January 6, 2026; and Regular Meeting of January 6, 2026.

Attachments
^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of January 6, 2026 ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 6, 2026 - corrected votes for items 4.1(a) and

4.15(a)
MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 8
135
01/06/2026
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
January 6, 2025, 4:45 PM
The meeting was called to order at 4:45 p.m. by Mayor Mike Littau with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Dr. Paul Dhanuka, Jack Munns and Erin Resner.

Also present: City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, Interim City Manager Kari Kibler, Management Analyst Kristen McGee, and Executive Assistant II Erin Barnhart.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Littau announced that no one present wished to speak regarding the following Closed Session item.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:06 p.m., Mayor Littau opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 6:43 p.m., Mayor Littau reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. This item was continued to the end of the Regular City Council meeting scheduled for the same date and noticed for 6:00 p.m.
3B. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of Litigation
One potential case
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.
3C. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Wynhoff v. City of Redding; Shasta County Superior Court Case No. 24CV-0204924 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

At the hour of 6:45 p.m., Mayor Littau declared the meeting adjourned and continued item 3A(1)(2) to trail to the end of the regular City Council Regular Meeting held on the same date, January 6, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the City of Redding Council Chambers located at 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001.

CONTINUED CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 8:10 p.m., Mayor Littau reconvened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 8:44 p.m., Mayor Littau reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Interim Personnel Director Saelee Employee Organizations:
(1) Redding Independent Employees’ Organization-Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit; and
(2) Redding Independent Employees’ Organization-Supervisory & Confidential Unit Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of January 6, 2026 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 136
01/06/2026

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 8:45 p.m., Mayor Littau declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
______________________________
Mike Littau, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of January 6, 2026 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 1 01/06/2026
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
January 6, 2026, 6:00 PM
Updated 2/13/26 to correct the vote on items 4.1(a) and 4.15(a) The meeting was called to order at 6:55 p.m. by Mayor Mike Littau with the following Council Members present: Tenessa Audette, Dr. Paul Dhanuka, Jack Munns, and Erin Resner.

Also present: City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, Interim City Manager Kari Kibler, Interim Assistant City Manager Michael Webb, Management Analyst II Kristen McGee, and Executive Assistant II Erin Barnhart.

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tempore Resner.

The Invocation was provided by Lori Moretti, Redding Police and Fire Departments' Chaplain.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Cathy Grindstaff, Shasta Chemical People, requested to provide Council with a formal presentation to ask that a portion of the funds received by the City of Redding from statewide opioid settlements be allocated to its programs.

The following spoke in opposition to personnel actions against Redding Chief of Police Brian Barner: Joe Dokes, Robert Sid, David Ledfrord, Gary B., Richard, Phaedra, Patricia Sucini, Joshua Johnson, Steve Kohn, and Jonathan Anderson.

Marg Cantrell expressed concerns with fiscal impacts that California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and other miscellaneous expenses have on the City of Redding’s budget.

Delores Lucero urged Council to investigate the allegations and personnel matter regarding Redding Police Chief Barner.

Leslie Sawyer inquired into the lease negotiations for the race track located near the Redding Airport.

Nick Gardner expressed opposition to the hiring process of the City Manager.

There was a brief discussion amongst Vice Mayor Dr. Dhanuka, Council Member Audette, and City Attorney Curtis relative to Redding Municipal Code section 2.08.080 (Immune from council influence concerning personnel) that prevents the City Council from influencing City Manager decisions relative to personnel actions. Mr. Curtis noted that Council would need to go through the ordinance process if a change to this RMC section is requested.

Council Member Munns left Chambers at 7:17 p.m. and returned at 7:18 p.m.

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:
4(a). Approve City Council Minutes: Regular Meeting of November 18, 2025; Special Meeting - Closed Session of December 2, 2025; Regular Meeting of December 2, 2025; Special Meeting - Closed Session of December 3, 2025,(City Manager Recruitment); Continued Special Meeting – Closed Session from December 3, 2025, held on December 4, 2025, 4:30 p.m.; Special Meeting of December 4, 2025, (The Peaks Subdivision Appeal); Special Meeting – Closed Session of December 11, 2025; Special Meeting - Closed Session of December 16, 2025; Regular Meeting of December 16, 2025; and Special Meeting – of December 26, 2025.

Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 6, 2026 - corrected votes for items 4.1(a) and 4.15(a) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 2 01/06/2026

4.1(a). Accept update regarding the proclamation declaring a local emergency due to flooding and, pursuant to Public Contract Code 20168 and 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a fourfifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Dr. Dhanuka, Munns, Resner, and Littau NOES: Council Members – Audette
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

4.15(a).Authorize and approve a side letter agreement with the Redding Police Officers Association – Miscellaneous Unit (RPOA – Misc) which: (1) revises the Community Service Officer (CSO) classification specification to allow for the performance of RedLight Camera Ticket (RedFlex) duties; and (2) amends Section 8.12 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to provide a five percent (5%) specialty assignment pay to CSOs when assigned to perform those duties, effective during the term of the MOU.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Dr. Dhanuka, Munns, Resner, and Littau NOES: Council Members – Audette
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Dhaunka seconded by Council Member Munns, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, and/or authorized as recommended with the exception of those item(s) voted upon separately above.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Dr. Dhanuka, Munns, Resner, and Littau NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None
REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
9A. Appoint William Tarbox as the City Manager and consider approval of Employment Agreement.

Interim City Manager Kari Kibler summarized the Report to the City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

Steve Kohn and Delores Lucero spoke in opposition to the incoming City Manager salary schedule.

In response to Vice Mayor Dr. Dhanuka, City Attorney Curtis advised that, in accordance with legal requirements to maintain confidentiality, closed session discussions regarding the City Manager position cannot be discussed in open session unless the City Council votes unanimously to do so.

Vice Mayor Dr. Dhanuka stated that Council consensus was that the City Manager salary was necessary to get someone who is willing and able to do the job, and was not an easy decision.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Resner, seconded by Council Member Munns, to appoint William Tarbox as the City of Redding City Manager; and authorize the Mayor to execute the Employment Agreement at an annual salary of $295,000.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.
9B. City Council updated list of Departmental, Commission, Committee, and Agency liaison assignments for Calendar Year 2026.

Mayor Littau provided an overview of the Report to the City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 6, 2026 - corrected votes for items 4.1(a) and 4.15(a) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 3 01/06/2026
Mayor Littau noted that there were very few changes from last year’s assignments, and after querying the Council, stated that all were satisfied with the appointments.

A brief discussion amongst the Council ensued.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

9.1(b). Accept oral report from Ad Hoc Committee (Mayor Pro Tempore Resner and Council Member Audette) regarding funding for the Civic Auditorium.

Mayor Pro Tempore Resner highlighted the Report to the City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

Ms. Resner and Council Member Audette highlighted that the they met with Advanced Redding, and other community stakeholders regarding investing in the Civic Auditorium, and advised the next steps would be to meet with Community Services Director Travis Menne for the lease and long-term plans for the Civic Auditorium.

Leslie Sawyer opposed providing additional funding support to Advanced Redding.

In response to Council Member Audette, Community Services Director Travis Menne noted that he would return to Council with short-term and long-term options for consideration at a future Council Meeting.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A consensus of Council: (1) accepted the oral report from ad hoc committee members Mayor Pro Tempore Erin Resner and Council Member Tenessa Audette regarding funding challenges for the Civic Auditorium; (2) directed the Ad Hoc Committee to meet with Community Services Director Travis Menne; and (3) the Ad Hoc Committee will provide regular updates at future agendized City Council meetings.

SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS FOR

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
At Vice Mayor Dhanuka’s suggestion, a consensus of Council directed staff to return to Council at a future City Council Meeting with a draft resolution regarding formation of the Finance Committee.

At Council Member Audette’s suggestion, a consensus of the City Council directed staff to schedule a Special City Council Meeting to discuss revenue assumptions prior to the end of January 2026.

At Council Member Audette’s suggestion, a consensus of the City Council directed staff to return to Council at the January 20, 2026, City Council meeting with an update from the City of Redding Airport Manager regarding the Airport Race Track Lease.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 8:46 p.m., Mayor Littau declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
______________________________
Mike Littau, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 6, 2026 - corrected votes for items 4.1(a) and 4.15(a) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 7; and Payroll Register Nos. 14 and 15.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:

Accounts Payable:
(1) Register No. 7 for the period January 1, 2026 – January 31, 2026, in the amount of $23,586,337.94.

Payroll:
(1) Register No. 14 for the period December 21, 2025 – January 3, 2026, in the amount of $3,026,542.75; and
(2) Register No. 15 for the period January 4, 2026 – January 17, 2026, in the amount of $2,876,885.53
MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.

Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 14
Report to Redding City Council February 5, 2026
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2 Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 Packet Pg. 15

CITY OF REDDING

SUMMARY OF DEMAND REGISTERS

FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
ON
February 17, 2026
TOTAL
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:

REGISTER NUMBER - 7
January 1, 2026 - January 31, 2026
PAYROLL:

REGISTER NUMBER - 14
December 21, 2025 - January 3, 2026
REGISTER NUMBER - 15
January 4, 2026 - January 17, 2026

REGISTER NUMBER -
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/CITY TREASURER:
23,586,337.941
3,026,542.75 1
2,a76,aa5.53 1
29,489,766.22
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 7 and Payroll Register No. 14 & 15 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving adopting the 21st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025- 049 appropriating $0 by utilizing personnel savings to fund the demolition of the subject property located at 825 Industrial Street, which has been the focus of prolonged City of Redding Code Enforcement efforts due to chronic nuisance conditions, multiple structure fires, advanced structural deterioration, repeated trespassing, and significant public safety concerns.

Fiscal Impact
Code Enforcement has obtained a demolition estimate of approximately $30,000 to fully raze the structure and remove all rubble. Staff is requesting to appropriate personnel savings of $40,000 to an account for building demolition which will be applied to demolition, debris disposal, and reasonable contingencies of a nuisance property.

The Development Services Department is expected to have salary savings in Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 due to keeping two budgeted, vacant positions unfilled, as well as one staff member taking an unpaid leave, which is sufficient to offset the $40,000 funding request.

In addition, these costs would be eligible for recovery, and a lien could be placed against the property in accordance with applicable law, however, due to the timing and unknown value of the pending tax sale, this cost recovery is highly unlikely.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the resolution, in which case demolition would not occur, and the community would continue to experience the impacts of the chronic nuisance conditions at the site. If demolition does not occur, continued strain on City services, including Fire, Police, and Code Enforcement, would be expected to persist.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.4(a)--Authorize and approve budget resolution regarding Nuisance Abatement for 825 Industrial Street, by the City of Redding.

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 58
Report to Redding City Council February 11, 2026
Re: 4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Redding Page 2 Code Enforcement has evaluated the following alternative actions:

1. Waiting for a tax auction (scheduled for February 27, 2026) and coordinating with a future owner.

This option involves significant uncertainty and delay, during which the nuisance conditions would persist. The property continues to be occupied by homeless individuals, creating ongoing life-safety risks. Allowing the structure to remain standing materially increases the likelihood of additional fires, emergency responses, and risk to the public and first responders.

2. Pursuing receivership.

While legally viable, receivership would require petitioning the Superior Court and securing placement on the court’s calendar, which is not an efficient or predictable process for timely nuisance abatement in this case. This option is resource-intensive and procedurally complex and is unlikely to resolve the conditions faster than direct City action, particularly given the current condition of the structure and the City’s existing abatement authority. Receivership is generally better suited for less exigent situations not requiring immediate resolution.

Background/Analysis
At the regularly scheduled meeting of January 20, 2026, City Council meeting, Staff presented this item requesting the $40,000 appropriation from General Fund Reserves. Council directed staff to bring this item back and show that salary savings from the department are sufficient to cover the $40,000 funding request. Accordingly, the Fiscal Impact section of this staff report has been updated and the background information below remains unchanged.

The subject property represents a long-standing and unresolved nuisance that has progressively escalated from a code compliance matter into a sustained public safety risk. As documented in the attached staff report for the December 17, 2025 Administrative Hearings Board (AHB) Item No. 5, the decedent-owned property has been the focus of prolonged Code Enforcement activity due to chronic nuisance conditions, multiple structure fires, advanced structural deterioration, repeated trespassing, and ongoing hazardous activity. Despite extensive outreach, enforcement actions, and opportunities for compliance, the violations have not been abated.

In recent years, significant legislative and policy changes related to homelessness have altered how local governments may respond to encampments, trespassing, and related quality-of-life issues. At the same time, the criminal justice system has become increasingly overloaded and underfunded, limiting its ability to address chronic nonviolent nuisance activity. As a result, properties such as this—vacant, unsecured, and structurally compromised—often become magnets for repeated unauthorized occupancy, fires, and emergency responses, placing the burden squarely on local government enforcement and emergency services.

The Administrative Hearings Board upheld and adopted the attached abatement order, increasing the potential total administrative penalties to $80,000. The hearing was one of the most highly attended AHB hearings in recent years, with several aggrieved members of the public and neighboring property owners providing testimony regarding their negative experiences associated with the property. Testimony cited persistent safety concerns, repeated emergency responses, and sustained quality-of-life impacts on the surrounding neighborhood.

Packet Pg. 59
Report to Redding City Council February 11, 2026
Re: 4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Redding Page 3 The structure remains vacant and unsecured and continues to attract unauthorized entry and hazardous activity. Most notably, a structure fire occurred on December 16, 2025, one day prior to the AHB hearing, requiring a significant emergency response that included 24 fire personnel, five fire apparatus, and more than two hours of firefighting resources. This incident underscores the immediate and ongoing risk posed by the continued existence of the structure and the cumulative strain placed on City emergency services.

The adopted Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order authorizes the City to abate the nuisance conditions through direct action, including demolition of the structure, removal of debris, site cleanup, and cessation of prohibited activities. The Order also authorizes recovery of all associated enforcement and abatement costs by way of a property lien or special assessment lien, but because of the timing of the pending tax sale and unknown value of the sale, full cost recovery is very unlikely to occur.

Direct demolition represents the most immediate, reliable, and effective method of eliminating a long-standing nuisance, reducing public safety risk, and relieving ongoing demands on emergency and enforcement resources.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Budget Resolution

1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025

2. Adopted Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order, December 17, 2025 Packet Pg. 60
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 21st AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-049 APPROPRIATING $0 BY UTILIZING SALARY SAVINGS FROM BUILDING DIVISION TO FUND

BUILDING DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES WITHIN CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101
101
1111
1131
Building Department
Code Enforcement $40,000
$40,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Expenditures
101-1111-4001001-00000 Full Time Regular $ (40,000)
101-1131-5050003-00000 Building Demolition - Non City
Property 40,000
Total $ - $ -
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $0 by utilizing salary savings within building division to fund building demolition activities within code enforcement division.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of February, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Redding) Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: 1. Report to Administrative Hearings Board, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street by City of

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BOARD

CITY OF REDDING

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
REDDING, CALIFORNIA 96001
HEARING DATE: December 17, 2025
HEARING TIME: 2:00 P.M.

ADMINISTRATIVE ABATEMENT AND PENALTIES ORDER
Responsible Party/Property Owner(s): FOSSIL LLC
825 Industrial Street
Redding, CA 96002
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 107-200-019-000
Location of Violation(s): 825 Industrial Street
Redding, CA 96002
A. Based on the Code Enforcement Division staff report accepted into evidence, all other oral and written testimony, and evidence presented at the hearing, the Administrative Hearings Board makes the conclusions, based on a preponderance of the evidence:

1. Fossil LLC, as Responsible Party, did maintain violations of the Redding Municipal Code (RMC) and California Building Code (CBC), on the property at 825 Industrial Street, Redding, California, since May 02, 2025.

2. The Administrative Compliance Order (“Compliance Order”) dated November 06, 2025, is hereby affirmed in regards to violations of RMC and CBC Sections CBC § 105.1, RMC § 1.15.150(A), RMC § 1.15.150(B), RMC § 1.15.160(B), RMC § 1.15.160(D), RMC § 1.15.160(E.3.D).

B. The conclusions of law set forth above are supported by the following findings of fact:

1. Fossil LLC, is the Responsible Party within the meaning of RMC § 1.14.020 for such property and/or violations at issue.

2. In support of this Board’s conclusion that Responsible Party was in violation of the Compliance Order, the Board finds that from November 14, 2025, to present day, the Responsible Party:
a. Failed to obtain a permit to demolish remaining structure from property. b. Kept and maintained trash bags, piles of wood/lumber, equipment items, and various other miscellaneous items all throughout the entire property.

Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 2. Adopted Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street

c. Kept and maintained overgrown vegetation to exist without proper maintenance as well as years of dead vegetation accumulated throughout the entire property and covering other belongings and structures
d. Kept and maintained structural members including but not limited to, truss ends, truss additions, facia boards and roof sheathing in a deteriorated state. e. Kept and maintained property conditions that are detrimental to surrounding properties.
f. Kept and maintained structural members of fencing and trash enclosures in disrepair.

C. Based on the facts and findings set forth above, the Administrative Hearings Board hereby adopts the following Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order:

1. Compliance Actions. The Administrative Hearings Board hereby orders that on or before December 27, 2025, the Responsible Party/Property Owner(s) shall comply with the following:
a. Cause the cessation of all nuisance activity, as identified on the Compliance Order, on the subject property.
b. Complete demolition permit to remove remaining structure. c. Remove all junk, trash, debris, or unused equipment from the property. d. Contact the City of Redding Code Enforcement Division and allow entry and permission to inspect the premises to confirm the cessation of nuisance activities, and that the violations have been abated at the premises.

2. Administrative Penalties. Pursuant to RMC § l. l4. l80(B) and in consideration of the factors set forth in RMC § 1.14.190, Responsible Party shall pay administrative penalties to the City of Redding in the amount of $1,000 on or before December 28, 2025. a. The amount of penalties is supported by the conduct of the Responsible Party. Setting the initial penalty in an amount sufficient to discourage the Responsible Party from maintaining the hazardous and ongoing violations is reasonable. The violations have been ongoing since November 14, 2025, the date set for abatement by the Compliance Order. The duration of the violation is extensive. The Responsible Party ignored fair warnings that their activities were unlawful and their inaction would lead to escalation.

Their disregard of the numerous written and verbal warnings, including the Compliance Order, is noted and indicative of a disregard for the requirements of the Redding Municipal Code and other pertinent adopted codes.

3. Additional Administrative Penalties. Pursuant to RMC § 1.14.190(B), if full compliance with the Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order is not achieved by December 27, 2025, additional administrative penalties will be assessed against the Responsible Party, Fossil LLC, at a rate of $100 per day beginning December 28, 2025, until the date that the Board’s Order is complied with, up to a maximum of $80,000.

Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 2. Adopted Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street

D. Failure to comply. Failure to comply with the Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order by the deadlines set forth above may result in:

1. The City collecting all costs and penalties due pursuant to this Order by the means and remedies set forth in Chapter § 1.14 of the Redding Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, the filing and recordation of a lien and the order of a special assessment.

2. Prosecution pursuant to RMC § 1.14.200(C).

3. The City abating the nuisance condition including, but not limited to, demolishing, removal, cleaning, ceasing prohibited activities and collection of all costs of removal and enforcement by way of a property lien or special assessment lien.

4. The City filing a civil nuisance abatement action, which may include a Health and Safety Receivership cause of action or petition.

E. Authority Granted to City Staff. Should the Responsible Party/Property Owner(s) fail to comply with the provisions of the Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order by the deadlines set forth above, the Administrative Hearings Board specifically authorizes City of Redding Code Enforcement staff to administratively carry out any or all of the remedies set forth in Section “D” of this Order, as may be deemed appropriate by staff.

F. Extension of Time. The Building Official, when applicable, within the scope of his authority and in his discretion, may grant an extension of time, not to exceed ninety (90) days, within which to complete the required abatement, if the official determines that such an extension of time will not create or perpetuate a situation imminently dangerous to life or property. The Official's authority herein is discretionary and shall not be compelled nor shall it in any way extend the time to appeal this Order or challenge any order of the abatement hearing officer. An extension of time may be granted upon receipt of all the below:

1. An application for extension of time from the person required to conform to the final Order.

2. An agreement by such person that he or she will comply with the Order if allowed additional time.

3. An application for any required permits accompanied by the required permit fees.

G. Right to Judicial Review. Pursuant to RMC § 1.14.170(D), any person aggrieved by this Order may obtain review of the Order within 90 days by filing with the Shasta County Superior Court a petition for review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, except, however, if the Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order solely contains the imposition of administrative penalties, judicial review of the Order shall be pursued by filing a petition for review with the Shasta County Superior Court within 20 calendar days of service of the Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order, in accordance with the timelines and provisions set forth in California Government Code Section 53069.4. Enforcement of any order made pursuant to this chapter shall be stayed during the pendency of a proper and timely filed petition for review.

H. Notice Regarding Proof of Compliance. Pursuant to RMC § 1.14.230 and § 1.14.240, it is your responsibility to notify Code Enforcement when compliance with this Order is achieved. Should Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 2. Adopted Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street

you disagree with the date of compliance determined by the Code Enforcement Supervisor, you may request a Compliance Hearing pursuant to RMC § 1.14.240.

Executed this 17th day of December 2025.

Peter Figura, Chair
Administrative Hearings Board
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 2. Adopted Administrative Abatement and Penalties Order, December 17, 2025 (4.4(a)--Nuisance Abatement - 825 Industrial Street

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve ratification of submission of a grant application to the California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program in the amount of $689,226.09; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant agreement and all subsequent documentations and to administratively appropriate the award.

Fiscal Impact
This grant does not require matching funds. There is no negative fiscal impact in accepting this grant.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to ratify the grant application. The Redding Police Department (RPD) would lose the opportunity to focus additional efforts toward traffic enforcement.

Background/Analysis
On January 29, 2026, RPD submitted a proposal to the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for its 2026 funding year, which begins October 1, 2026. RPD requested funding for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program for an additional year of the dedicated DUI Officer, increasing traffic safety enforcement overtime operations, purchase and outfit three patrol vehicles, and purchase of fixed mounted radar devices on the Department’s motorcycles, in the amount of $689,226.09.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.9(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application Brian Barner, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 152
Report to Redding City Council February 10, 2026
Re: 4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application Page 2 The DUI Officer will be dedicated to working DUI enforcement at night and during the weekends. The grant will fund overtime for the following traffic enforcement activities:
enforcing speed limits, deterring aggressive driving, conducting DUI checkpoints, saturation patrols, motorcycle enforcement, bicycle/pedestrian enforcement, and funding for community outreach and education. Overtime funding has been requested for officers to provide education to the citizens through RPD’s Citizen’s Academy and to hold “Coffee with a Cop” events. These operations will provide the opportunity for citizens to interact with the Department and to have a better understanding of how traffic issues impact the community. Additionally, funds have been requested for training, and checkpoint supplies. RPD also requested funding for six motorcycle mounted radar devices which will allow motor officers to maneuver through traffic more safely than when using hand-held devices. The last item requested is three fully equipped patrol vehicles. These vehicles will be used for OTS operations and will be wrapped indicating they are funded through an OTS grant and indicating the purpose of the vehicles. This is a one-year grant with a timeframe of October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027.

Environmental Review
Accepting the grant is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, therefore, no further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
Submitted Application
Packet Pg. 153
Application :: Page 1 of 26
Application Information
Application No: 27-007718
Application Type: STEP Agency (City
or County): Redding
Department
(Police
Dept, DA
Office, etc):

Redding Police
Department
Authorized
Representative: Brian Barner
Additional
Contact
Email:
[email protected] DUNS/SAM
Number: XL3JUNNVFLL9

DUNS/SAM
Expiration Date: 1/6/2027

DUNS/SAM
Registered
Address:
777 Cypress Avenue DUNS/SAM
City: Redding

DUNS/SAM
ZIP+4: 96001-2718
Application Summary
Grants Made Easy Application Titles and Descriptions are pre-populated. For General Grants, provide the Application Title and Application Description.

Application Title:

Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)
Application Description:

Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

Problem Statement
Describe the problem(s) to be addressed utilizing current data-driven evidence. Be specific and focus on the issue that is relevant and significant within your community.

Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 2 of 26

1. Describe the city, county, or jurisdiction this grant will impact.

Problem Statement:

The City of Redding is not only the largest city in Shasta County, but also the largest city north of Sacramento. Redding enjoys many natural landscapes and serves as a gateway to outdoor recreation, offering a high quality of life for residents and visitors alike. Redding is located along the Sacramento River and provides picturesque views of the Cascade and Klamath mountain ranges. Residents of Redding appreciate the four seasons that our climate provides, with hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters.

With a population of approximately 93,000 people, Redding is the primary urban center in Northern California, outside the Sacramento area. Redding serves as a hub for commerce, healthcare, and education, attracting people from smaller towns and rural areas throughout Shasta County and beyond. Despite its growth, the city maintains a strong sense of community and small-town charm, making it a desirable place to live. Its diverse economy is supported by key industries such as healthcare, retail, tourism, and public services, with a growing emphasis on renewable energy and outdoor-focused businesses.

Redding is known for its rich opportunities for recreation and its iconic landmarks. The Sundial Bridge spans the Sacramento River and doubles as a working sundial. Nearby, Turtle Bay Exploration Park offers cultural and educational experiences with its museum, arboretum, and wildlife exhibits. Shasta Dam, the second-largest dam in the United States, is a short drive away, providing breathtaking views and access to water sports and fishing at Shasta Lake. Shasta Lake is not only the largest reservoir in California, covering nearly 30,000 acres and over 365 miles of shoreline, but also one of the largest in the United States. The Whiskeytown National Recreation Area, with its pristine lake, waterfalls, and hiking trails, further adds to Redding's appeal as an outdoor destination.

The Lassen National Forrest offers residents and visitors alike the year-round opportunity to hike, backpack, camp, fish, and hunt in some of the area’s most notable locations, such as the Thousand Lakes Wilderness and the Caribou Wilderness. North of Redding is Mount Shasta, one of the most iconic and revered mountains in the United States. Rising over 14,000 feet into the clear sky, Mount Shasta is a destination location for climbing, hiking, skiing and snowboarding.

Transportation in Redding is convenient and accessible. The city is well-connected by Interstate 5, a major north-south highway, and Highway 44 and Highway 299, both of which are substantial east-west arteries. Redding offers additional travel options through its Amtrak station and Redding Municipal Airport. These transportation networks make Redding a key access point to Northern California's many attractions.

Community life in Redding is vibrant, with numerous events and activities that bring residents together. Annual traditions such as Kool April Nites, the Redding Rodeo, the Freedom Festival, Big Bike Weekend, the Lighted Christmas Parade and local festivals, and outdoor concerts celebrate the city's culture and heritage. The parks and trails throughout Redding provide countless opportunities for outdoor enthusiasts to explore its natural beauty.

Demographics
The median age in Redding is 39 years, which is slightly higher than the national average, reflecting the higher number of retirees who reside here. The population is fairly balanced in terms of gender, with slightly more females than males. Approximately 78% of the residents are white, with several other ethnic groups comprising the remaining approximate 22%. Redding is relatively educated, with many residents Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 3 of 26
holding high school diplomas. Approximately 26% of the residents have earned bachelor’s degrees or higher, thanks to institutions like Shasta College and Simpson University. The world-renowned Bethel School of Ministry also calls Redding home and attracts visitors from around the world to study. The median household income in Redding is approximately $70,000, which is approximately $27,000 lower than the state average, but reflective of a much lower cost of living and home ownership, which is common among residents.

Redding has a mix of long-time residents and newcomers, including retirees drawn by the city's natural beauty, outdoor recreation, and more relaxed pace of life. The community also includes younger families and professionals contributing to the city's evolving demographics. These demographics highlight Redding's diverse and dynamic population, which plays a vital role in shaping the city's culture and economy.

Redding Police Department
The Redding Police Department (RPD) is a full-service police department and serves as the primary law enforcement agency in Redding. Committed to community-oriented policing, the department works diligently to ensure the safety and security of its residents and visitors, while fostering strong relationships within the community. RPD provides a wide range of services, including patrol operations, traffic enforcement, criminal investigations, and community outreach programs. RPD is also involved in regional efforts, partnering with neighboring agencies for collaborative enforcement and emergency responses.

RPD is comprised of 109 sworn officers and 45 support staff. The traffic unit, which is responsible for carrying out the majority of the OTS grant operations, is comprised of a sergeant, four (4) motor officers, a DUI officer, and two (2) community service officers and a parking enforcement officer. The Traffic Sergeant and Management Analyst are responsible for managing the OTS grant. The Department utilizes modern technology to enhance its operations, including body-worn cameras, automated license plate readers, red-light cameras, and crime analysis software. This adds to RPD’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

RPD places a high priority on training its officers. This includes firearms, defensive tactics, crisis interventions, cultural competency, leadership development and SFST/ARIDE. The Department also participates in regional training exercises to ensure readiness in an emergency.

RPD is widely regarded as a professional and dedicated agency. Its officers are not only law enforcement professionals, but also active members of the community. RPD participates heavily in several events to educate the community. These events include Coffee with a Cop, Bicycle Rodeos, Car Seat Safety Presentations, and a Citizen Academy. RPD worked alongside community members and city leaders to develop a Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 4 of 26
Strategic Plan which outlines several areas that needed attention and set goals to positively affect these areas in the community.

2. Describe the problem(s) to be addressed, supported by current crash and/or other relevant data. (most recent calendar year data/stats)
Problem Statement:

Redding's unique combination of natural beauty, outdoor recreation, and cultural attractions draws countless tourists and visitors to the community each year, making it a premier destination in Northern California. With world-renowned landmarks such as the Sundial Bridge, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Shasta Lake, and Mount Shasta nearby, Redding offers unparalleled opportunities for hiking, boating, fishing, and sightseeing.

Events such as the Redding Rodeo, local music festivals, and Kool April Nites contribute to the city’s vibrant appeal. This influx of visitors causes Redding’s population to swell significantly during all seasons, putting additional demand on local infrastructure, roads, and public safety services. Many visitors and tourists contribute to the dangerous roadway conditions in Redding, whether it be unsafe driving practices or driving while impaired.

Traffic-related issues are a significant concern for the City of Redding impacting public safety, mobility and overall quality of life. Like many cities experiencing growth, Redding faces challenges in managing traffic volumes, ensuring roadway safety, and addressing infrastructure needs.

A major traffic-related issue in this community is the incidents of driving under the influence (DUI). DUI contributes significantly to traffic crashes, injuries and fatalities.

While Redding is still seeing predominantly alcohol-related DUI incidents, drug-impaired driving incidents are on the rise. Some contributing factors are many individuals underestimate not only the risks of driving after consuming alcohol but also underestimate their impairment. Redding also suffers from a lack of transportation alternatives, such as ridesharing options. This poses a challenge for individuals to find safe alternatives to driving after drinking. In 2025, the Department made 483 DUI arrests, which is 78 more arrests than in 2024, and is building on the increase of 60 arrests from 2023, for a total increase of 138 arrests.

Redding has seen success with DUI/Driver’s License checkpoints and have had success with arresting drivers who are under the influence. More than that, checkpoints serve as an opportunity for RPD to educate the community on the dangers of driving under the influence and also let the community know this is a priority. However, the equipment used is in disrepair. The DUI trailer is leaking in several locations, ruining the interior of the trailer. The decals and badging on the trailer are outdated and does not grab the attention of the community, serving as a reminder to avoid driving after drinking. The on-board generator is constantly needing service to stay functioning. Fortunately, OTS funded a new DUI trailer in the 2025-26 award but it will be several more months before it is ready for use.

With the growing homeless population in Redding, there has been an increase in the number of pedestrians and bicyclists involved in crashes with vehicles. Many individuals who are experiencing homelessness frequently travel on foot or by bicycle, often along busy streets or in areas with limited infrastructure for non-motorized traffic. This has led to safety concerns, as these vulnerable road users are at higher risk of being struck by vehicles.

Distracted driving, particularly due to the use of wireless devices, remains a pressing concern in Redding. Despite years of public education and awareness campaigns, many Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 5 of 26
drivers continue to engage in distracting behaviors while operating a vehicle, significantly increasing the risk to public safety. Beyond wireless devices, drivers are often distracted by other activities such as eating, grooming, or adjusting in-car technologies, further compounding the issue. These distractions diminish reaction times and attention to the road, leading to preventable crashes and near-misses.

Community outreach is essential for RPD in fostering strong relationships with both young people and adults in the community. Education plays a significant role in preventing future traffic-related issues and promoting public safety. The Department understands that addressing these concerns early is crucial for instilling lifelong safe habits in individuals. Events like Coffee with a Cop, bicycle rodeos, and the Citizen Academy are pivotal in engaging the community and spreading awareness about safety. These outreach initiatives are not only valuable for building trust and cooperation but also for shaping a culture of responsibility and safety, ensuring that Redding remains a safer place for everyone. Such efforts are integral to the Department’s mission of fostering a well-informed, proactive community that values safety at every level.

By and large, many individuals arrested for DUI in Redding continue to pose significant risk to public safety by driving while intoxicated, even after their initial arrest. These offenders often refuse to comply with court-mandated requirements and fail to appear for court proceedings. In many cases, they disregard judicial advisements, continuing to drive despite having their driver’s license suspended. This persistent disregard for legal consequences highlights the challenges law enforcement faces in deterring repeat DUI offenses and underscores the need for enhanced monitoring, stricter penalties, and community education to address this ongoing threat to road safety.

Speed remains a significant contributing factor in traffic crashes throughout the City, leading to increased injury and fatality rates in a variety of incidents. Excessive speed not only escalates the severity of crashes but also compromises the safety of vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians and bicyclists. Particularly concerning are areas near schools, where speeding poses a heightened risk to children walking to and from school.

These zones are critical for focused traffic enforcement and public awareness efforts to protect the youngest members of the community.

RPD currently utilizes seven Lidar units as the primary tool for enforcing speed-related violations across the community. These devices play a critical role in identifying and addressing speeding, helping to enhance road safety. However, six of these units are assigned exclusively to the department’s motor officers, limiting their availability to other officers who may also wish to assist in reducing speeding and improving safety throughout the city.

The Department has made progress in several crucial areas, but there are still several areas of concern that require focused attention and resources.

From grant cycle 2023-2024 to grant cycle 2024-2025, traffic fatalities in Redding increased by 50%, increasing from 4 to 6. Traffic crash injuries decreased by 6%, from 519 to 488. Pedestrian injuries decreased by 8%, and bicycle injuries decreased by

11.1%. Injuries from hit and run crashes decreased by almost 16%. Most notably, fatal crashes from drug DUIs decreased by 100%, followed by drug DUI injuries, which decreased by just over 52%. This is a testament to the impact the full-time DUI officer is having on our community and the lives he is saving. Injuries from alcohol-involved crashes and combo crashes increased to 14%, and the number of fatal crashes was unchanged at 2 for the cycle. These numbers as a whole show that the efforts of the DUI officer are working, but that there is still a lot of work that needs to be done. Fatal Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 6 of 26
crashes with motorcyclists increased from 1 to 2, and motorcyclist injuries increased from 22 to 42.

3. Define the target population the grant intends to serve and how they are affected by the problem(s). If the target population includes any at-risk populations, please include how this traffic safety grant will serve them.

Problem Statement:

The target population that the grant intends to serve is the City of Redding which serves as a regional hub for Northern California with a population of approximately 94,000 residents. As the largest city between Sacramento and the Oregon border, Redding experiences significant commuter traffic, a high volume of travelers along Interstate 5 and State Routes 44, 273, and 299, and increased roadway congestion due to tourism, recreation, and local economic activity.

Traffic safety remains a top priority for the Redding Police Department due to rising vehicle collisions, impaired driving incidents, excessive speed violations, and pedestrian-involved crashes. These issues pose a serious threat to public safety, particularly affecting families, commuters, pedestrians, cyclists, and school-aged children who navigate the city's roadways daily. Data trends indicate higher-than-average crash rates compared to similar-sized jurisdictions, underscoring the urgent need for targeted enforcement and educational initiatives to reduce traffic-related injuries and fatalities.

The STEP grant will provide the Redding Police Department with the resources necessary to enhance traffic enforcement, DUI enforcement and deterrence, distracted driving awareness, and pedestrian safety measures. By implementing proactive enforcement operations and public education campaigns, this funding will directly reduce dangerous driving behaviors, mitigate collision risks, and improve overall roadway safety for residents and visitors alike. The grant will also support collaboration with neighboring agencies to address traffic concerns regionally, ensuring a comprehensive and effective approach to traffic safety in Northern California.

Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 7 of 26
Traffic Data Summary:

City Applicants: Complete the table below using the most current local data and update the 20XX years in the table (do not use the OTS Rankings).

County or State Applicants: Complete the table below using TIMS data and update the 20XX years in the table.

Crash
Type 2023 2024 2025
Crashes Victims Crashes Victims Crashes Victims
Fatal 7 7 5 5 5 5
Injury 354 489 379 531 354 458
Fatal Injury Killed Injured Fatal Injury Killed Injured Fatal Injury Killed Injured Alcohol -
Involved 2 14 2 21 3 35 3 47 0 30 0 43
Hit & Run 0 23 0 25 2 36 2 45 1 37 1 42
Nighttime
(2100-0259
hours)
2 26 2 31 2 23 2 32 1 35 1 39
Top 3 Primary Crash Factors Fatal Injury Killed Injured #1 -
22350
CVC
Unsafe Speed 2 79 2 108
#2
-21801(a)
CVC
Failure to yield - Left turn 0 38 0 60
#3 -
21804(a)
CVC
Failure to yield – Public or private property 0 27 0 33 Proposed Solution
Strategies:

Full-time DUI Officer
The Redding Police Department has seen substantial progress in addressing impaired driving through the deployment of a dedicated DUI officer funded by the STEP grant.

Impaired driving remains one of the leading causes of traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities in our community. With the addition of a dedicated officer, we have significantly increased DUI arrests and enforcement activities, which have directly contributed to enhanced roadway safety. To sustain this momentum, we are requesting funding for an additional year to retain this vital position.

In the current grant year, the DUI officer has demonstrated exceptional results, including Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 8 of 26
being on track to achieve 300 DUI arrests during this grant cycle. This represents a significant increase in enforcement productivity and has contributed to the removal of dangerous drivers from roadways before they could cause harm.

Expanding this position for another year will allow the Department to build on these successes. The DUI officer’s work has not only increased enforcement but has also enabled the Department to focus on targeted education campaigns, outreach efforts, and high-visibility operations, all of which align with the goals of the STEP grant in reducing DUI-related crashes and fatalities. Funding this position will ensure that these critical operations can continue without interruption.

DUI Saturation Patrols
RPD is committed to combat impaired driving, which continues to be a significant public safety concern in the community. DUI-related crashes remain a leading cause of traffic injuries and fatalities, and despite our ongoing enforcement efforts, the prevalence of impaired driving underscores the need for additional resources. To address this, RPD is requesting to maintain the current 25 operations.

Enforcement efforts have yielded measurable results, with 78 more DUI arrests made last year compared to the previous year, building on the increase of 60 the year before that. Additionally, the dedicated DUI officer is again on track to make 300 DUI arrests this year alone, highlighting both the success of our current strategy and the persistent challenge of impaired driving in our area. With the maintenance of our operations, or their expansion, we can build on this momentum by conducting more frequent and strategically deployed saturation patrols. These operations would focus on high-risk areas and times, such as weekends, holidays, and special events, when DUI activity is statistically higher, ensuring a targeted and impactful approach to enforcement.

Additional DUI saturation patrols will provide a highly visible police presence, serving as both a deterrent to impaired driving and a proactive means of removing impaired drivers from roadways. These expanded efforts would not only enhance enforcement efficiency but also demonstrate our commitment to traffic safety. Furthermore, this initiative aligns directly with our strategic goal of reducing traffic crashes and fatalities and supports the broader mission of OTS to improve roadway safety across California.

Given the success of current efforts, including the remarkable performance of the DUI officer, RPD is well-positioned to maximize the impact of additional funding for saturation patrols. Investing in these operations will further reduce the number of impaired drivers on the roads and save lives.

DUI Checkpoints
DUI checkpoints are a proven and highly effective tool for reducing impaired driving and improving roadway safety. As part of the RPD’s comprehensive traffic enforcement strategy, these operations serve both as a deterrent and a proactive measure to identify and remove impaired drivers before they can cause harm. To support and expand these efforts, funding is requested through the STEP grant to maintain the current number of DUI checkpoint operations.

Impaired driving remains one of the leading causes of traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities in the community. DUI checkpoints play a critical role in addressing this issue by increasing public awareness, enhancing enforcement visibility, and reinforcing the consequences of impaired driving. These highly publicized and strategically placed operations deter potential offenders and educate the community on the dangers of Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 9 of 26
driving under the influence.

Checkpoints are uniquely effective in reaching a broad audience. Unlike saturation patrols, which target impaired drivers on the road, checkpoints allow officers to engage with a higher volume of drivers, screening for signs of impairment and educating motorists about traffic safety laws. Additionally, these operations often result in the identification of other dangerous violations, such as driving without a license, further contributing to overall public safety.

RPD has seen success with previous checkpoint operations, with several impaired drivers being arrested and removed from the roadway. DUI checkpoints align directly with Office of Traffic Safety’s mission to reduce impaired driving and improve roadway safety. These operations not only reduce DUI-related crashes but also foster public trust by demonstrating the department’s commitment to proactive enforcement and community safety. By maintaining the current number of DUI checkpoint operations, RPD can continue to implement effective traffic safety initiatives that make a measurable difference in reducing DUI-related incidents in the community.

General Traffic Enforcement Operations
Traffic safety remains a top priority for RPD as we work to reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities on our roadways. While the Department recognizes the importance of focusing on specific issues, such as impaired and distracted driving, a broader approach to general traffic enforcement is essential to address the full spectrum of dangerous driving behaviors that contribute to traffic incidents. To support these efforts, RPD is requesting funding through the OTS grant to conduct 25 general traffic enforcement operations.

Speeding, red-light violations, unsafe lane changes, and failure to yield are among the most common factors contributing to crashes. General traffic enforcement targets these behaviors, ensuring that all drivers adhere to the rules of the road and fostering safer conditions for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians. Funding from the Office of Traffic Safety would enable RPD to deploy additional resources, such as focused patrols and high-visibility enforcement, to address these issues more effectively.

In addition to enforcement, general traffic operations provide opportunities for education.

By interacting with drivers during stops, officers can inform the public about safe driving practices and the consequences of dangerous behaviors, further encouraging voluntary compliance with traffic laws.

By addressing the full range of unsafe driving behaviors, these efforts contribute to a comprehensive traffic safety strategy. Moreover, data from previous enforcement initiatives shows that increased patrols and visibility lead to a measurable reduction in crashes and injuries, underscoring the importance of sustained general enforcement operations.

With STEP grant funding, RPD can expand its general traffic enforcement efforts, enhance public safety, and work toward achieving a safer roadway environment for everyone. This investment will allow us to address the diverse challenges of traffic safety while continuing to build a strong partnership with the community.

ARIDE, SFST, and DRE Training, as well as DRE and SFST Instructor Training RPD is committed to reducing impaired driving, which continues to be a leading cause of traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities in our community. To further enhance efforts in identifying and apprehending impaired drivers, it is imperative to train the young officer Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 10 of 26
in the department in ARIDE (Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement), SFST (Standardized Field Sobriety Testing), as well as DRE Instructor (Drug Recognition Expert Instructor) and SFST Instructor training.

SFST training is the foundation of DUI enforcement, providing officers with a scientifically validated method for assessing impairment at roadside stops. By mastering SFST, officers can accurately assess alcohol impairment and administer field sobriety tests in a standardized manner, leading to more reliable and legally sound DUI investigations. ARIDE training further complements this by equipping officers with advanced skills to detect drug impairment, a growing concern in impaired driving. With drug impairment on the rise, officers trained in ARIDE can accurately differentiate between alcohol and drug-related impairment, enhancing the department’s ability to make comprehensive DUI arrests.

RPD is requesting funds to train officers in SFST (8), ARIDE (8), and DRE (2). By training officers to become instructors in both DRE and SFST, we can build internal capacity to sustain and expand our impaired driving enforcement program and create buy-in among the ranks. These instructors will not only provide training to new recruits and current officers but also serve as mentors to ensure that all officers maintain high standards of proficiency in DUI enforcement. Having in-house instructors will significantly enhance the department’s ability to continuously improve its DUI enforcement capabilities while reducing the reliance on external training programs.

With the growing complexity of impaired driving, these skills are more critical than ever.

ARIDE, SFST, DRE Instructor, and SFST Instructor training will not only improve the detection and apprehension of impaired drivers but also ensure the long-term sustainability and effectiveness of our DUI enforcement efforts. This crucial training will help maintain high standards of enforcement and support long-term reductions in impaired driving-related crashes, injuries, and fatalities.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Operations
Bicycle and pedestrian safety continue to be a critical concern in the City of Redding.

With the growing number of individuals walking and bicycling, particularly in areas with heavy traffic, crashes involving these vulnerable road users are on the rise. In particular, areas near schools, major intersections, and commercial corridors experience a high volume of pedestrian and bicycle activity, increasing the likelihood of accidents caused by speeding, distracted driving, or failure to yield to pedestrians and bicyclists. These incidents often result in severe injuries or fatalities due to the lack of physical protection for pedestrians and cyclists.

Additional operations through the STEP Grant would enable the RPD to dedicate resources to targeted enforcement operations aimed at reducing these crashes. The grant would allow officers to focus on areas with a history of pedestrian and bicycle crashes, enforcing traffic laws that protect these road users, such as yielding at crosswalks, obeying speed limits, and prohibiting distracted driving. Additionally, the grant would support public awareness campaigns to educate both drivers and pedestrians about safe practices, fostering a culture of mutual respect on the road.

By funding operations that address these critical issues, the STEP Grant would directly contribute to reducing injuries and fatalities, promoting safer mobility for all community members. Enhanced enforcement combined with education creates a deterrent effect, encouraging compliance with traffic laws and ultimately saving lives. This initiative aligns with the department’s mission to improve public safety and supports statewide goals to reduce traffic-related injuries and deaths.

Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 11 of 26
Distracted Driving Operations
Distracted driving has become a pervasive threat to roadway safety, contributing to a significant number of traffic crashes, injuries, and fatalities each year. RPD is committed to addressing this issue as part of a broader traffic safety strategy. Despite existing enforcement efforts, the rise in distracted driving incidents, particularly those involving mobile device use, demonstrates a pressing need for additional resources. To combat this issue effectively, RPD is requesting funding for 16 distracted driving operations through the STEP Grant.

Distracted driving poses a unique challenge due to its widespread nature and the difficulty of detection. With the prevalence of smartphones and other in-car distractions, drivers are increasingly engaging in behaviors that divert their attention from the road.

These behaviors significantly increase the likelihood of crashes, sometimes resulting in serious injuries or fatalities. These operations would allow the RPD to focus on high-risk areas and peak times where distracted driving is most prevalent, utilizing high-visibility enforcement and targeted strategies to reduce this dangerous behavior. It would also help the department increase public awareness through enforcement campaigns that highlight the dangers and consequences of distracted driving. High-profile operations, coupled with educational outreach, serve as both a deterrent and a tool for fostering long-term behavioral change among drivers. By incorporating these efforts into the broader traffic safety initiatives, RPD aims to reduce crashes and improve compliance with California’s hands-free driving laws.

Court Stings and Warrant Sweeps
RPD seeks to address ongoing safety concerns associated with individuals who continue to drive unlawfully despite having outstanding warrants or suspended driver’s licenses. These offenders often pose a significant risk to public safety, as their willingness to disregard legal requirements suggests a propensity for other unsafe or illegal driving behaviors. Addressing this issue is critical to reducing traffic-related injuries and fatalities in the community.

RPD is requesting funding to conduct two (2) targeted warrant sweeps and two (2) suspended driver’s license court stings, focusing on individuals with a history of DUI, habitual traffic offenses, or other dangerous driving-related violations. These operations are essential in holding offenders accountable, deterring repeat offenses, and ensuring that high-risk drivers are removed from the roads. By dedicating resources to these enforcement efforts, the department can proactively prevent potential crashes and enhance overall traffic safety.

The grant funding would also support public awareness initiatives to educate the community on the consequences of driving with a suspended license or failing to appear in court for traffic-related offenses. These educational efforts, combined with enforcement, create a strong deterrent effect, encouraging compliance with court orders and traffic laws.

Through these warrant sweeps and court stings, the RPD aims to reduce repeat offenses, improve accountability, and promote a safer driving environment for all residents. This initiative aligns with statewide goals to reduce traffic injuries and fatalities and directly supports RPD’s mission to enhance public safety through strategic and proactive enforcement.

Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 12 of 26
Collaborative DUI Enforcement and General Traffic Enforcement The City of Redding serves as the central hub of Shasta County, with significant traffic volume flowing through its streets daily. This makes it a critical focal point for addressing regional traffic safety concerns. Collaborative DUI checkpoints, DUI enforcement, and general traffic enforcement efforts between the Redding Police Department, Anderson Police Department, Shasta County Sheriff's Department, and California Highway Patrol (CHP) are vital for tackling these issues effectively. Driving under the influence (DUI) continues to be a leading cause of traffic-related injuries and fatalities, and a unified, collaborative approach allows law enforcement to amplify its impact by sharing resources and expertise.

With funding from the STEP Grant, these partnerships would support high-visibility DUI checkpoints and roving patrols, which are proven strategies for deterring impaired driving. A collaborative approach means enforcement efforts are not confined by jurisdictional boundaries, allowing agencies to address traffic issues across the region, including those impacting Redding’s neighboring communities. This regional strategy ensures that no area is overlooked, ultimately benefiting everyone as it reduces crashes and enhances public safety throughout Shasta County.

The grant would also support joint enforcement efforts targeting primary crash factors such as speeding, distracted driving, and failure to yield in high-crash areas shared between jurisdictions. By working together, the involved agencies maximize their resources and broaden their coverage, making the roadways safer for all. As the hub of the county, Redding plays a critical role in these efforts, and the collaborative approach ensures that safety improvements extend beyond individual cities and into the broader region.

Through these coordinated operations, the STEP Grant would enable the RPD and its partner agencies to address traffic safety concerns comprehensively. This approach not only saves lives but also reinforces public trust, demonstrating that regional cooperation leads to safer streets for all residents of Shasta County. A collaborative effort means everyone wins, as it allows agencies to tackle issues that impact the community, regardless of geographical boundaries.

Fixed Radar for Police Motorcycles
Fixed radar units are an effective way for officers assigned to traffic to enforce traffic laws, including speeding. Speeding continues to be one of the most common and dangerous traffic violations contributing to crashes, injuries, and near-miss incidents throughout Redding. This concern is particularly elevated in school zones and other high-pedestrian areas, where even small increases in vehicle speed drastically raise the likelihood and severity of injury to children, families, and community members.

Currently, RPD consistently uses handheld speed measuring devices, or Lidars. While these are effective tools, it limits the officer and places them at risk. In heavy traffic, when they are stopped watching traffic, it is often difficult to safely insert themselves into traffic to catch the violator. The severe delay causes them to ride fast through traffic to overcome the violator and to act. Moving radar would be safer because the motorcycle officer would already be in traffic and more able to effectively make the enforcement stop. This would also enable them to address more of the violations that occur throughout the city.

With fixed radar units installed, motorcycle officers will be able to remain in targeted enforcement areas longer and more consistently, particularly during school commute Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 13 of 26
hours when speeding issues are most frequent. These radar systems will also support STEP-funded enforcement efforts by improving the department’s ability to conduct focused speed operations, respond to community complaints, and prioritize school zone safety initiatives aimed at reducing preventable crashes and improving overall compliance.

Providing fixed radar units will directly support high-visibility enforcement strategies by improving the department’s speed enforcement capability and strengthening officer safety through accurate, consistent speed detection, and their positioning. Ultimately, this equipment will increase productivity during STEP operations and help the Redding Police Department address ongoing speeding concerns, especially in school zones where motorists continue to drive at unsafe speeds and place vulnerable roadway users at risk.

Patrol Vehicles (3)
RPD is requesting funding for three (3) patrol vehicles to support ongoing traffic safety operations under the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP). These vehicles will be utilized on high-visibility saturation patrols, DUI checkpoint operations, bicycle and pedestrian operations, distracted driving operations, and other STEP Grant-funded enforcement activities that are intended to reduce alcohol- and drug-impaired driving, speeding-related crashes, and other dangerous driving behaviors.

The demand for proactive traffic enforcement within the City of Redding continues to grow, particularly during peak enforcement periods, special events, and weekend and nighttime hours when impaired driving and serious injury crashes historically increase.

To safely and effectively deploy officers during these targeted operations, the agency must maintain an adequate number of reliable and properly equipped vehicles that can be assigned specifically to grant-funded enforcement. This ensures the department can complete STEP operations without negatively impacting daily patrol resources.

Funding for three (3) patrol vehicles will allow the Redding Police Department to have designated vehicles to use for these operations, in a fleet of vehicles that is drastically diminished. These vehicles will support saturation patrol teams working in high-crash corridors and identified DUI arrest areas, and they will also be used during DUI checkpoints for safe officer positioning, transportation of equipment, and operational movement throughout the enforcement period. Reliable vehicles also reduce disruptions caused by mechanical issues, fleet shortages, and vehicle downtime, all of which can limit enforcement productivity and compromise the safety of officers working in high-risk roadside environments.

In addition, these patrol vehicles will be wrapped with highly visible graphics to increase public awareness of DUI enforcement efforts and maximize the deterrent effect of STEP operations. Increasing visibility through marked and wrapped enforcement vehicles strengthens high-visibility enforcement principles by encouraging voluntary compliance, discouraging impaired driving behavior, and reinforcing the message that DUI enforcement is active and ongoing in the City of Redding. Overall, the addition of these vehicles will directly support RPD’s mission to reduce traffic crashes, injuries, and Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 14 of 26
fatalities by ensuring officers have the equipment necessary to conduct consistent, focused, and effective STEP enforcement operations.

Agency Qualifications:

Moving into the 2026-2027 grant cycle, the Redding Police Department is eager to continue its strong partnership with the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). This partnership has been instrumental in enhancing traffic safety within the community by funding critical enforcement operations, public education initiatives, and necessary equipment purchases. The department utilizes a dedicated Management Analyst and Traffic Sergeant to oversee and monitor the STEP Grant, ensuring that grant goals are met while efficiently managing grant funds. These resources allow the department to fund traffic enforcement overtime and acquire tools essential for effective traffic safety operations.

The commitment of Redding Police Department personnel, both sworn and non-sworn, has been a cornerstone of the department’s success in meeting, and often exceeding, grant objectives. This is accomplished alongside their regular duties and other overtime responsibilities, demonstrating the team’s dedication to improving roadway safety. The Traffic Sergeant plays a pivotal role in managing the grant, overseeing day-to-day operations, press releases, social media posts, and grant-related activities. Additionally, the sergeant coordinates with allied agencies, such as the Anderson Police Department, Shasta County Sheriff’s Office, California Highway Patrol, and nonprofit organizations, ensuring alignment with OTS goals. As the sergeant enters a second year managing the OTS grant, their experience, combined with targeted training, ensures the effective execution of grant initiatives.

The department’s Management Analyst brings over 30 years of experience working for the City of Redding, including extensive work managing various grants. Currently overseeing the 2025-2026 OTS STEP Grant, the analyst has attended multiple OTS grant meetings and is highly familiar with the expectations and requirements for grant management. This expertise ensures compliance and maximizes the impact of grant funding.

The Redding Police Department maintains a high standard of professionalism by conducting comprehensive background checks on all personnel and volunteers before they participate in any department activities. This rigorous process ensures that everyone involved in grant-related operations aligns with the department’s commitment to integrity and public trust.

RPD looks forward to continuing its impactful collaboration with OTS in the upcoming grant cycle, furthering its mission to improve traffic safety and reduce crashes in the Redding community.

Community Collaboration and Engagement
Provide a description of the community collaboration and engagement activities that will be conducted and/or participated in by your department to address traffic safety. Community collaboration and engagement allows for the appropriate department personnel to engage in conversations to both share information and receive input from the community members regarding traffic safety.

Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 15 of 26
Community Collaboration and Engagement:

Community outreach and education are critical components of the RPD’s efforts to reduce traffic-related injuries and fatalities. Educating the public about safe driving practices, the dangers of impaired and distracted driving, and the importance of obeying traffic laws is essential for fostering a culture of safety and accountability on Redding’s roadways. Proactive education and outreach efforts allow law enforcement to engage directly with the community, creating trust and encouraging voluntary compliance with traffic laws before violations occur.

Through the STEP Grant, the Department would be able to provide the resources necessary to enhance the outreach and education initiatives. These efforts include programs such as bicycle rodeos to teach children safe cycling habits, school presentations to address pedestrian safety, and community events like Coffee with a Cop that foster open communication between law enforcement and residents.

Additionally, the funding would support educational campaigns targeting distracted driving, speeding, and DUI prevention, using social media, public service announcements, and direct community engagement to raise awareness about these critical issues.

By funding outreach and education, the STEP Grant would enable the department to address traffic safety issues at their root, influencing behavior and reducing the likelihood of future violations and crashes. These initiatives complement enforcement efforts, creating a well-rounded approach to public safety. Engaging the community through education not only saves lives but also strengthens the partnership between RPD and the residents it serves, ensuring a safer, more informed community for everyone.

Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 16 of 26
Goals
Description
Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

Custom Description
Objectives
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 17 of 26
Target
Number Description
1 Issue a news release announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31st. The kick-off news releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 7 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
12 Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1: National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: National Speed Prevention Campaigns, NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
12 Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. Report on the outcomes of the “DUI BOLO” program.
0 Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note:

Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
0 Conduct Illegal Street Racing and Modified Vehicle training classes for law enforcement personnel.

Included Target
Number Description
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 18 of 26
Yes 8
Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training.

Yes 8
Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training.

Yes 1
Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training (classroom and field training must be completed).

Yes 1 Send law enforcement personnel to the DRE Recertification training.

Yes 2 Send law enforcement personnel to SFST Instructor training.

No 0 Send law enforcement personnel to DRE Instructor training.

Yes 6
Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARIDE-trained.

Yes 25 Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s).

Yes 2
Conduct Court Sting operation(s) to cite individuals driving to and from the court after having their driver's license suspended or revoked.

Yes 2
Conduct Warrant Service operation(s) targeting multiple DUI offenders who fail to appear in court.

No 0
Conduct Stakeout operation(s) that employ law enforcement officers to observe repeat DUI offender probationers with suspended or revoked driver licenses.

Yes 25 Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.

Yes 16 Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.

No 0
Conduct highly publicized Motorcycle Safety enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of motorcycle incidents or crashes resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely, unsafe lane changes, improper turning, and other primary crash factor violations by motorcyclists and other drivers.

No 0 Conduct Nighttime (1800-0559) Click It or Ticket enforcement operation(s).

Yes 10
Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers.

No 0 Conduct Know Your Limit campaigns with an effort to reach members of the community.

Yes 2 Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations.

Yes 1 Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations.

Yes 2 Send law enforcement personnel to DUI Checkpoint Planning and Management training.

No 0
Conduct specialized enforcement operations focusing specifically on street racing and sideshow activities.

Yes 1
Identify grant funded, straight time personnel. Include any vacancies or staff changes that have occurred. For any vacancies, include the status of filling the vacancy.

Yes 2
Participate in community collaboration and engagement activities to engage in conversations regarding traffic safety to both share information and receive input from the community members.

No 0
Utilize the oral fluid drug screening device at roadside to assist with identifying drug use during DUI investigations. Report on the use, accomplishments, or challenges associated with the use of the oral fluid drug screening device.

Yes 2
Send law enforcement personnel to a POST certified implicit bias training, such as; Implicit Bias and Community Policing, Principles Policing, or Beyond Bias.

Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 19 of 26
Included Target Number Custom Description
Method of Procedure
Phase 1 - Program Preparation:

The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.

Conduct all training needed to implement the program, in the first quarter.

Purchase all grant related supplies and materials to implement the program, in the first quarter.

Items with a unit cost of $5,000 more (including tax and shipping) must comply with the Buy America Act.

In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.

Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.

Media Requirements
Issue a news release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31 and after the grant is signed and executed, but no sooner than October 1, the start of the grant year.

The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO. If you are unable to meet the December 31 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate the reasons to your OTS grant coordinator and OTS PIO.

Phase 1 - Program Preparation Addendum:

Phase 2 - Program Operations:

Media Requirements
The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:

Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.

Send all PowerPoint presentations, online presentations and trainings for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator.

Certified training courses are EXEMPT from the approval process.

The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the OTS grant coordinator.

Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 20 of 26
Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, news releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material. However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a news release, educational material, or link to social media post.

If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator.

News releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are EXEMPT from the OTS PIO approval process. The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).

Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are EXEMPT from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator with the embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email.

Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval.

Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.

Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication.

Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting: Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult the OTS PIO and copy your OTS grant coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.

Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so the OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event. If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of the event within 7 days following significant grant-related event or program. The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified in advance when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).

Any news releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received OTS PIO approval in a prior grant year must be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.

For additional guidance, refer to the OTS Grants Materials Approval Process Guidelines and FAQs .

Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] or your OTS grant coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

Phase 2 - Program Operations Addendum:

Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 21 of 26
Phase 3 - Data Collection:

1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives.

Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.

Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.

Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

Phase 3 - Data Collection Addendum:

Budget
Personnel Costs
Hourly Rates - When requesting hours for personnel, enter them as straight time or overtime (for Enforcement Overtime, please use section below) and include the amount of hours that they will spend on grant operations.

Example: Personnel getting paid 100% by the grant working a full year at $41.00 per hour would be entered as Straight time, 2080 Units, $41.00 Unit cost or Rate, and 100% Percent Paid by Grant. This gives a total of $85,280.00 for the year.

Benefits – If requesting benefits for personnel, enter all benefits as a separate line item for each. Start the Item Name with the word 'Benefits', enter the corresponding straight time or overtime total amount in the Unit Cost or Rate, and enter the Benefits Rate to have the system calculate Benefit Costs. (Unit Cost) X (Benefits Rate) = Benefit Costs. To properly relate benefits to the correct personnel line item use the Display Order field, for example use 100.0 for Display Order for the personnel line item and 100.1 for Display Order for the associated Benefits.

Display
Order
Cost
Category
Item
Name
Position
Type
Benefit
Rate
Unit Cost or
Rate Units Percent Paidby Grant
Calculated Cost
to Grant
100.0 A. Personnel
Costs
DUI
Officer
Straight
time $55.34 2,080 100.00% $115,107.20
100.1 A. Personnel
Costs Benefits Straighttime 102.25% $115,107.20 1 100.00% $117,697.11 125.0 A. Personnel
Costs
Benefits
OT 1.45% $133,088.00 1 100.00% $1,929.78
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 22 of 26
Display
Order
Cost
Category Enforcement Activity Item Name Unit Costor Rate Units CalculatedCost to Grant 110.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
DUI/DL Checkpoints DUI/DL Checkpoints $7,584.00 6 $45,504.00 111.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
DUI Saturation Patrols DUI Saturation Patrols $1,512.00 25 $37,800.00 112.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Collaborative DUI
Enforcement
Collaborative DUI
Enforcement $5,376.00 2 $10,752.00
113.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Warrant Service
Operations
Warrant Service
Operations $672.00 2 $1,344.00
114.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Court Stings Court Stings $672.00 2 $1,344.00
115.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Traffic Enforcement Traffic Enforcement $672.00 25 $16,800.00 116.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Distracted Driving
Enforcement
Distracted Driving
Enforcement $672.00 16 $10,752.00
117.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Enforcement
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Enforcement $672.00 10 $6,720.00
118.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Collaborative Traffic
Enforcement
Collaborative Traffic
Enforcement $672.00 1 $672.00
120.0
A.

Personnel
Costs
Community Collaboration
Engagement
Community Collaboration
Engagement $700.00 2 $1,400.00
Personnel Costs: $367,822.09
Travel Expenses
Display Order Cost Category Item Name Unit Cost or Rate Units Calculated Cost to Grant 200.0 B. Travel Expenses In State Travel $7,500.00 1 $7,500.00 Travel Expenses: $7,500.00
Contractual Services
Do not include brand names or names of specific organizations.

Display Order Cost Category Item Name Unit Cost or Rate Units Calculated Cost to Grant Contractual Services: $0.00
Equipment (must have Unit Cost of at least $10,000 including tax and shipping) Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 23 of 26
Do not include brand names or names of specific organizations.

Please include an equipment quote in the Upload Documents Tab.

NOTE : When creating a new "Equipment" budget item, the Standard Language Item drop down list may not be available. When this is the case, complete only the required fields and save the budget item. Once saved, select the Edit button (pencil icon); the Standard Language Item drop down list will be available for selection. Alternatively, if not requesting a Standard Language Item, please utilize the Custom Narrative field to enter an appropriate narrative.

Display Order Cost Category Item Name Unit Cost or Rate Units Calculated Cost to Grant 400.0 D. Equipment Patrol Vehicles $90,000.00 3 $270,000.00 Equipment: $270,000.00
Other Direct Costs (must have Unit Cost of less than $10,000, including tax and shipping) Do not include brand names or names of specific organizations.

NOTE : When creating a new "Other Direct Cost" budget item, the Standard Language Item drop down list may not be available. When this is the case, complete only the required fields and save the budget item. Once saved, select the Edit button (pencil icon); the Standard Language Item drop down list will be available for selection. Alternatively, if not requesting a Standard Language Item, please utilize the Custom Narrative field to enter an appropriate narrative.

Display
Order Cost Category Item Name Unit Cost orRate Units Calculated Cost toGrant 500.0 E. Other Direct
Costs Radar Device $6,484.00 6 $38,904.00
501.0 E. Other Direct
Costs
DUI Checkpoint
Supplies $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00
Other Direct Costs: $43,904.00
Indirect Costs
NOTE - Entry for Indirect Cost is different than prior years. Please read instructions carefully.

Item Name should indicate the % and the types of costs subject to the Indirect Cost Rate e.g. 15% of Salaries and Benefits. Enter one Unit Cost equal to the estimated Indirect Costs.

Indirect Cost Rate must be supported by a federally approved indirect cost rate letter and uploaded to the application.

Display Order Cost Category Item Name Units Unit Cost or Rate Calculated Cost to Grant Indirect Costs: $0.00
Total Requested Funding: $689,226.09
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 24 of 26
Narrative Review
Review and update Narrative for Budget Items
Cost
Category Item Narrative CustomNarrative
A.

Personnel
Costs
DUI Officer
Hours for officer dedicated strictly to DUI Enforcement. Hours may include wages or authorized absences, such as annual leave and sick leave, provided they are accrued during the grant term.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Benefits
Hours for officer dedicated strictly to DUI Enforcement. Hours may include wages or authorized absences, such as annual leave and sick leave, provided they are accrued during the grant term.

Benefits
for DUI
Officers
Worker's
Comp

10.006%
Group
Health

19.00%
PERS

71.797%
Medicare

1.45%
A.

Personnel
Costs
DUI/DL
Checkpoints
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
DUI
Saturation
Patrols
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Collaborative
DUI
Enforcement
Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
A.

Personnel
Costs
Warrant
Service
Operations
Overtime for grant funded Warrant Service Operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Court Stings Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Traffic
Enforcement
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Distracted
Driving
Enforcement
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Pedestrian
and Bicycle
Enforcement
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

A.

Personnel
Costs
Collaborative
Traffic
Enforcement
Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
A.

Personnel
Costs
Community
Collaboration
Engagement
Overtime for grant funded community collaborative engagement conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 25 of 26
A.

Personnel
Costs
Benefits OT
Medicare
on OT

1.45%
B. Travel
Expenses
In State
Travel
Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.

D.

Equipment
Patrol
Vehicles
2026
Chevrolet
Tahoe
PPV, tax,
license,
shipping
etc -
$65,000
per
vehicle
Equipment
and labor
to outfit
vehicles
$25,000
Total
estimated
cost of
$90,000
per
vehicle
E. Other
Direct
Costs
Radar
Device
To measure the speed of motor vehicles. This device will be used for speed enforcement.

E. Other
Direct
Costs
DUI
Checkpoint
Supplies
On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, PAS Device Supplies, PAS Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and canopies. Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not be reimbursed.

Upload Documents (Optional)
Document Name Update Date/Time
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application) Application :: Page 26 of 26
Evaluation, Support, and Submittal
Evaluation, Support, and Submittal
Method of Evaluation:

Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

Administrative Support:

This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.

Total Requested Funding:
$689,226.09
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Submitted Application (4.9(a)--Ratify Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project (Project):
(1) Increase project budget by $1,200,000; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 25th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $1,200,000 of Citywide Transportation Impact Fee funds for the project.

Fiscal Impact
Additional funding is required to continue work on the Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project. The City of Redding (City) has been working with Caltrans for an increase in grant funds proportionate to 88.53 percent of the increased costs. Staff has identified Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) as the required 11.47 percent match source for these grant funds. There is no General Fund impact to the recommended action.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to increase the project budget or adopt the resolution. In this case, the City would have a lapse in funding which could potentially stop critical work and endanger the eligibility of the project under the grant program.

Background/Analysis
On July 21, 2015, the Council appropriated Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds in the amount of $1,853,850 for the project. Subsequently, on May 17, 2022, the Council appropriated additional HBP funds in the amount of $2,056,690 for the project. In April 2023, Caltrans approved, and the Council appropriated, the City’s request for additional HBP funding in the amount of $867,593.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Approve Increase to Project Budget and Adopt Budget Resolution for the Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 180
Report to Redding City Council February 11, 2026
Re: 4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge over Olney Creek Project Page 2
Shortly after commencing initial construction activities in May 2023, the Contractor encountered unanticipated contaminated soils within the project limits; ultimately impacting project cost (contingency funds) and schedule. Subsequently, in June 2025, the City awarded a Construction Inspection Contract to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. to assist City staff with Construction Administration, Inspection and Testing. As a result, additional funding is needed to replenish the project budget, specifically Construction Contingency and Construction Administration to provide adequate resources to successfully complete the project. The attached budget resolution appropriates TIF funding while staff coordinate for HBP funding. Once additional HBP funds are secured, the swap between HBP funds and TIF funds will be done administratively. Any HBP funding beyond $1.2 million will be presented and budgeted in a separate resolution which may also include adjusting TIF funds appropriately and correspondingly to the additional HBP funds.

Below is a table showing the cost increases for construction contingency and construction administration, inspection, and testing. Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Current
Authorized
Requested
Increase
Newly
Authorized1
Expended
(To Date)
2 Balance
(To Date)
Contract $3,703,683 $0 $3,703,683 $1,998,992 $1,704,691 Contingency $1,240,000 $400,000 $1,640,000 $1,084,865 $555,135 Construction
Management $947,000 $800,000 $1,747,000 $850,000 $897,000 City Manager
Funds $15,000 0.00 $15,000 $0 $15,000
Total $5,905,683 $1,200,000 $7,105,683 $3,933,857 $3,171,826 Notes:
1Newly Authorized identifies the newly authorized budgeted amounts assuming Council chooses to accept this budget resolution.
2Expended (To Date) lists the estimated expenditures as of January 20, 2026.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

On February 6, 2018, Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the Eastside Road at Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines §15074). No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Packet Pg. 181
Report to Redding City Council February 11, 2026
Re: 4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge over Olney Creek Project Page 3
Attachments
^Budget Resolution
Staff Report 2-6-2018
June 3, 2025-4.11f-Award RFP MarkThomasContract
Packet Pg. 182
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 - _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 25 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-049
APPROPRIATING $1,200,000 IN ADDITIONAL TIF FUNDING FOR THE EASTSIDE ROAD OVER OLNEY CREEK BRIDGE PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
151 1691 Traffic Impact Fee Capital $1,200,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
151-0000-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 1,200,000
Increase Expenditures
151-1691-7700010-00000 Bridges $ 1,200,000
Total $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $1,200,000 in contributed funding for the Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge project for the fiscal year 2025-2026.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of February, 2026 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge over Olney Creek Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approve the Eastside Road Bridge at Olney Creek Bridge Replacement Project as described. With this action, the City of Redding will be in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines §15074).

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program allows the project to move forward toward the final design and construction phases. There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring Program.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) can choose to not adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Without approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the project would not proceed forward as a City project, as it would be out of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Background/Analysis
The City’s Public Works Department proposes to replace the existing 30-foot wide, 70-foot long, three span bridge on Eastside Road over Olney Creek. The new 52-foot wide, 86-foot long, three span cast-in-place concrete slab bridge will meet current design standards and hydraulic capacity needs. The new roadway approach will include two 12-foot wide travel lanes, eight foot wide shoulders, and six foot wide sidewalks on Eastside Road. The proposed sidewalk on the east side of the road will connect to an existing sidewalk in the southeastern corner of the project area.

MEETING DATE: February 6, 2018
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
[S-070-050/A-050-300]
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Adoption of Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek Mitigated Negative Declaration
Brian Crane, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Staff Report 2-6-2018 (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge over Olney Creek Project) Report to Redding City Council January 30, 2018
Re: 4.11(c)--Adoption of Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek MND Page 2 Approaching roadwork will extend approximately 200-feet to the south, and up to 300-feet to the north of the bridge. Construction of the proposed project would require two seasons; beginning in the spring of 2019, with completion by late Fall 2020.

The bridge foundation system will likely consist of spread footings supporting the pier walls and cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles at the abutments. If CIDH piles are used, pile driving will not be necessary. However, driven piles may be needed to support falsework. If pile driving is used, it would occur during the dry summer months when water would likely be absent from the channel. If water is present during construction, a temporary stream diversion using standard culverts and rounded fish gravel would be used during construction. The spread footing would require an excavation of 6 to 8-feet in the channel, and the bridge abutments would be armored with rock slope protection (RSP). The new abutments would sit above the flow line, with two piers in the channel. Approximately 180 cubic yards of ¼ ton RSP would be placed around the bridge abutments, of which approximately 160 cubic yards would be placed below the ordinary high water mark.

Utilities, including a 10-inch gas line and a 10-inch water line, will be relocated from the existing bridge structure to the new bridge structure. Overhead utilities will not require relocation. An existing storm drain that currently discharges into the creek at the northwest corner of the bridge will be reconstructed through the new bridge abutment. The storm drain will outlet at the northern abutment and onto the RSP, which would dissipate flow energy.

Staged construction will be used to build the bridge. Traffic controls, such as a temporary signal or one way traffic control, will be used to maintain traffic flow through the project area.

Alternative routes such as SR 273 and South Bonnyview Road will be available during construction. The contractor staging area will be located on the abandoned road extension immediately north of the bridge. Temporary construction easements would be required for the project.

An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It describes why the Project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed Project could have a significant effect on biological resources, but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The mitigation measures and conservation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre-construction surveys, in-water work windows, impact minimization, exclusionary fencing, erosion control, and on-site plant restoration.

Based on the conclusions made in the IS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project.

In addition, a Mitigation and Monitoring Program (MMP) has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.

Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Staff Report 2-6-2018 (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge over Olney Creek Project) Report to Redding City Council January 30, 2018
Re: 4.11(c)--Adoption of Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek MND Page 3 The IS, MND, and MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30-day public review period before distribution to pertinent state agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies and the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. No comments were received during the public comment period.

The City of Redding is the lead agency for the Project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the City Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section §18.24.070.E and state law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the City Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk’s Office and the State Clearinghouse, completing the environmental review process. The IS and MND are available in the City Clerk’s office for review.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Site Location Map
Initial Study (available online)
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Staff Report 2-6-2018 (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge over Olney Creek Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) - Schedule No. 5577 - Construction Inspection Services and Material Testing Services for the Eastside Road Bridge Over Olney Creek Project (Project):
(1) Award RFP to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $886,111.38 with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., to provide Construction Inspection and Material Testing Services for the Project; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract amendments not-to-exceed $50,000.

Fiscal Impact
The Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project (Project) is being funded by two sources which consist of the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and the City of Redding (City) Citywide Transportation Impact Fee Program (TIF). The HBP will fund 88.53 percent of the project while the remaining 11.47 percent will be through TIF. Since the bids were higher than the engineer’s estimated cost, staff will be working with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to obtain additional HBP funding for the project. Staff anticipates the HBP to fully fund its share of the project total costs based upon previous experience with other bridge HBP funded projects. Until those additional funds become available, the TIF will cover the costs above the estimate. Any additional HBP funds will be presented and budgeted in a separate resolution.

MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule Number 5577 and authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for Construction Inspection and Materials Testing Services for the Eastside Road Bridge Over Olney Creek Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: June 3, 2025-4.11f-Award RFP MarkThomasContract (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to award this contact, in which case, City staff would be required to manage construction inspection and material services. This would require either consultant services to be solicited for other capital work or reduction in the City’s capital program delivery.

Background/Analysis
This project includes the replacement of the Eastside Road bridge over Olney Creek and the rehabilitation of the approach roadway. The work will include removal of the existing bridge in stages, construction of a new bridge over two summer seasons, construction of retaining walls, sidewalk, curb and gutter, utility relocation, roadway construction, and other miscellaneous items of work.

The project is currently recommencing construction activities after being in a long unanticipated project suspension. The City’s engineering staff will be overseeing approximately 20 projects this construction season and there is insufficient staff to provide construction inspection for a project of this magnitude and complexity without affecting the delivery of other projects. As such, consultant support is required.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
In March 2025, a formal Request for Proposals - No. 5577, outlining the specific scope of work, was advertised. Proposals were required to include a scope of work and proposed fee. Proposals and fee schedules were received on March 28, 2025, from three firms. A review and selection panel were formed with members from the Public Works Department. Based upon proposal review and experience, the panel ranked the firms as follows:

FIRM RANK
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Ghirardelli Associates
1 2
TRC Engineers, Inc. 3
Proposals were evaluated based on their understanding of the scope of work, ability to meet the proposed schedule and maintain the project budget, experience and qualifications of the proposed staff, ability to work with staff, project approach, familiarity with state and City of Redding procedures, and geographic location of the team. Applying the criteria to the proposals, the selection panel determined that Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (Consultant) was the best qualified firm to provide the required services for this project.

Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: June 3, 2025-4.11f-Award RFP MarkThomasContract (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(f)--Award RFP Bid Schedule No. 5577 Construction Inspection Services Page 3 Following the evaluation and ranking, the consultant’s proposed fees were opened, evaluated, and negotiated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services as well as previous similar projects cost comparisons.

The consultant fee is estimated and the contract will be for actual work performed. However, staff recommends the approval of an additional $50,000 in contingency reserve. Contingency funds may be necessary due to unforeseen project issues including potential claims. If this reserve needs to be utilized, a contract amendment would be negotiated with the consultant and the contract would be modified with approval of the City Manager.

This contract has been approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On February 6, 2018, the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) and approved the project, thereby satisfying the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.

On March 1, 2018, Caltrans determined the project is categorically excluded from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, pursuant to 23 CFR 771.117(c): activity (c)(28) - Bridge Replacement.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Project Location Map
Contract
Caltrans_NEPA CE_Eastside at Olney Bridge 3-1-2018
Previous Staff Report 5-17-2022
Previous Staff Report 2-6-2018
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: June 3, 2025-4.11f-Award RFP MarkThomasContract (4.11(a)--Approve Project Budget Increase & Reso for Eastside Rd Bridge

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5470, Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Project:
(1) Reject the apparent low bid by JS Builders, Inc. as nonresponsive and award the project to the second low bidder JF Shea Construction, Inc., in the amount of $4,748,526; (2) Approve an additional $712,200 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $985,000 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $474,500 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 24th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $2,318,780 for the Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement project; increasing appropriation of federal grant funds by $267,360 and increasing appropriation of Transportation Impact Fee funds by $2,051,420.

Fiscal Impact
The Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Project (Project) is being funded by two sources which consist of the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and the City of Redding (City) Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program. The total estimated cost of the project is $6,970,226. To date, the City has received HBP fund authorization in the amount of $4,348,591. Current grant budgeted appropriations total $4,081,231. The attached resolution increases the amount of grant appropriation by $267,360 to match the amount awarded to date. The total project costs exceed grant funding by $2,621,635. A total of $570,215 will be funded using previously approved TIF funds. The remaining $2,051,420 in additional TIF funding to fully fund the project is requested on the attached resolution.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 190
Report to Redding City Council February 11, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Page 2
Since the bids were higher than the engineer’s estimated cost, staff will be working with California Department of Transportation to obtain additional HBP funding for the project. Staff anticipates the HBP to fully fund its share of the project total costs based upon previous experience with other bridge HBP funded projects. It is anticipated that the HBP will fund 88.53 percent of the project, with a maximum anticipated grant obligation of $6,170,741; the remaining

11.47 percent, $799,485, will be funded using TIF. Until those additional funds become available, the TIF will cover the costs above the estimate. When additional HBP funds are allocated to the project, the TIF funds will be swapped administratively. The HBP funds being appropriated at this time are currently authorized funds that were not previously budgeted.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $985,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $5,223,026
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $712,200
Additional City Manager Authority $50,000
Total Project Costs $6,970,226
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the project is not awarded, the bridge will not be replaced, and nonstandard conditions for pedestrians and motorists will remain. In addition, the City would be at risk of losing federal funds and may have to reimburse project development funds spent to date.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on January 29, 2026, for the project. The low bid in the amount of $4,342,696.95 was received from JS Builders, Inc of Palo Cedro, California. However, after further evaluation of the proposal documents by staff, the apparent low bidder submitted the proposal on the incorrect forms therefore deeming the bid as nonresponsive. Staff then proceeded to evaluate the second low bidder, J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. of Redding, California in the amount of $4,748,526. All proposal documents were prepared on the correct forms and submitted properly, therefore staff recommends awarding the project to the second low bidder, J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. The engineer's estimate was $3,345,000.

Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $985,000. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, consultant services, and permit fees.

This project includes the replacement of the Westside Road bridge over Canyon Hollow Creek as well as the approach roadway to the bridge. The work will include removal of the existing bridge in stages, construction of new bridge over two construction seasons, construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, utility relocation, roadway construction, and other miscellaneous items of work.

It is anticipated that the project will be completed in fall 2027.

Packet Pg. 191
Report to Redding City Council February 11, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Page 3
Environmental Review
On June 16, 2020, the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and approved the project, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074). No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Budget Resolution
^Location Map
^Bid Tabulation
Previous Staff Report 6-16-2020
Packet Pg. 192
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 - _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 24TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-049
APPROPRIATING $2,318,780 IN ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE WESTSIDE

ROAD OVER CANYON HOLLOW CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
151
151
1671
1691
Transportation Grant Projects
Traffic Impact Fee Capital
$267,360
$2,051,420
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
151-1671-3608001-00000
Federal Grant Capital - Public
Works $ 267,360
151-0000-2910000-00000 Fund Balance $ 2,051,420
Increase Expenditures
151-1671-7700010-00000 Bridges $ 267,360
151-1691-7700010-00000 Bridges $ 2,051,420
Total $ 2,318,780 $ 2,318,780
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $2,318,780 in contributed funding for the Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge project for the fiscal year 2025-2026.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of February, 2026 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement) Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement) X:\Projects\Westside Rd at Canyon Hollow Bridge_2475\Design\Plans\Drawings\Location Map.dwg, CC 8x11 Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement) BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475 ENGINEER'S EST J. F. Shea Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
1 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND STAKING LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $28,500.00 $28,500.00 2 LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,280.00 $2,280.00 3 PROGRESS SCHEDULE (CRITICAL PATH METHOD) LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $11,400.00 $11,400.00 4 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 6 TYPE III BARRICADE EA 15 $150.00 $2,250.00 $125.00 $1,875.00 7 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING (PAINT) SQFT 48 $40.00 $1,920.00 $29.00 $1,392.00 8 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC STRIPE (PAINT) LF 3266 $4.00 $13,064.00 $3.50 $11,431.00 9 CHANNELIZER (SURFACE MOUNTED) EA 82 $50.00 $4,100.00 $80.00 $6,560.00 10 TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $59,000.00 $59,000.00 11 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EA 3 $3,500.00 $10,500.00 $13,675.00 $41,025.00 12 TEMPORARY RAILING (TYPE K) LF 1280 $40.00 $51,200.00 $49.00 $62,720.00 13 TEMPORARY ALTERNATIVE CRASH CUSHION EA 7 $3,500.00 $24,500.00 $1,140.00 $7,980.00 14 JOB SITE MANAGEMENT LS 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 15 PREPARE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN LS 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $2,850.00 $2,850.00
16 MOVE-IN/MOVE-OUT (TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL) EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $570.00 $1,140.00 17 TEMPORARY HYDRAULIC MULCH (BONDED FIBER
MATRIX) SQYD 700 $3.50 $2,450.00 $8.50 $5,950.00
18 TEMPORARY FIBER ROLL LF 553 $7.00 $3,871.00 $7.00 $3,871.00 19 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 200 $6.00 $1,200.00 $7.00 $1,400.00 20 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 2 $240.00 $480.00 $8,575.00 $17,150.00 21 STREET SWEEPING LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 22 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,680.00 $6,680.00 23 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT EA 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 $570.00 $5,700.00 24 WATER QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,140.00 $2,280.00 25 TEMPORARY CREEK DIVERSION SYSTEMS LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $92,000.00 $92,000.00 26 ASBESTOS COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,850.00 $2,850.00 27 REMOVE YELLOW PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE
(HAZARDOUS WASTE) LF 827 $10.00 $8,270.00 $9.00 $7,443.00 28 CONTRACTOR-SUPPLIED BIOLOGIST LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 29 TEMPORARY HIGH-VISIBILITY FENCE LF 153 $4.00 $612.00 $11.00 $1,683.00 30 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (LS) LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 31 (F) ROADWAY EXCAVATION CY 575 $80.00 $46,000.00 $53.00 $30,475.00 32 ROADWAY EXCAVATION (TYPE Z-2) (AERIALLY
DEPOSITED LEAD) CY 120 $120.00 $14,400.00 $144.00 $17,280.00 33 (F) STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (TYPE D) CY 331 $150.00 $49,650.00 $223.00 $73,813.00 Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475 ENGINEER'S EST J. F. Shea Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
34 (F) STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) CY 140 $130.00 $18,200.00 $655.00 $91,700.00 35 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 340 $150.00 $51,000.00 $15.00 $5,100.00 36 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 170 $140.00 $23,800.00 $3.50 $595.00 37 BONDED FIBER MATRIX SQFT 5918 $0.25 $1,479.50 $1.50 $8,877.00 38 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE CY 487 $80.00 $38,960.00 $95.00 $46,265.00 39 HOT MIX ASPHALT (TYPE A) TON 886 $110.00 $97,460.00 $134.00 $118,724.00 40 TACK COAT TON 2.58 $1,675.00 $4,321.50 $800.00 $2,064.00 41 COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 2723 $10.00 $27,230.00 $4.00 $10,892.00 42 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 1) LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $51,000.00 $51,000.00 43 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 3) LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $22,600.00 $22,600.00 44 TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $58,000.00 $58,000.00 45 30" CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING LF 1450 $300.00 $435,000.00 $427.00 $619,150.00 46 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE FOOTING CY 45 $750.00 $33,750.00 $1,900.00 $85,500.00 47 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE CY 135 $900.00 $121,500.00 $2,295.00 $309,825.00 48 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE (POLYMER FIBER) CY 181 $1,100.00 $199,100.00 $2,285.00 $413,585.00 49 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, APPROACH SLAB (TYPE EQ) CY 33 $1,000.00 $33,000.00 $2,740.00 $90,420.00 50 (F) MINOR CONCRETE (MINOR STRUCTURE) CY 15 $3,500.00 $52,500.00 $2,725.00 $40,875.00 51 JOINT SEAL (MR 1") LF 107 $70.00 $7,490.00 $110.00 $11,770.00 52 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE) LB 134053 $2.00 $268,106.00 $2.00 $268,106.00 53 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (GALVANIZED) LB 798 $2.00 $1,596.00 $4.00 $3,192.00 54 BRIDGE REMOVAL LS 1 $54,000.00 $54,000.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 55 REMOVE PIPE LF 55 $150.00 $8,250.00 $109.00 $5,995.00 56 REMOVE ASBESTOS CONCRETE WATERLINE LF 247 $250.00 $61,750.00 $72.00 $17,784.00 57 REMOVE DRAINAGE JUNCTION STRUCTURE EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 58 RECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $19,000.00 $38,000.00 59 CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $19,500.00 $19,500.00 60 ADJUST FRAME AND COVER TO GRADE EA 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 61 ADJUST WATER VALVE TO GRADE EA 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 62 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (300 lb, Class IV, METHOD B) CY 165 $350.00 $57,750.00 $295.00 $48,675.00 63 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (20 lb, Class I, METHOD B) CY 2.2 $300.00 $660.00 $3,500.00 $7,700.00 64 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION FABRIC (CLASS 8) SQYD 275 $30.00 $8,250.00 $7.00 $1,925.00 65 MINOR CONCRETE (CURB AND GUTTER) CY 44 $1,000.00 $44,000.00 $1,390.00 $61,160.00 66 MINOR CONCRETE (DRIVEWAY) CY 15 $1,200.00 $18,000.00 $1,300.00 $19,500.00 67 MINOR CONCRETE (SIDEWALK) CY 26 $900.00 $23,400.00 $1,300.00 $33,800.00 68 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY CY 15 $100.00 $1,500.00 $900.00 $13,500.00 Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475 ENGINEER'S EST J. F. Shea Construction, Inc

UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
69 REMOVE CONCRETE (CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK) LF 628 $50.00 $31,400.00 $22.00 $13,816.00 70 (F) MISCELLANEOUS METAL (BRIDGE) LB 2225 $3.00 $6,675.00 $28.00 $62,300.00 71 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS (TEMPORARY WATERLINE) LF 235 $350.00 $82,250.00 $883.00 $207,505.00 72 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS LF 229 $350.00 $80,150.00 $1,300.00 $297,700.00 73 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 2 $5,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,250.00 $22,500.00 74 20" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 3 $6,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,500.00 $55,500.00 75 4" BLOWOFF VALVE EA 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 76 FORCE BALANCED EXPANSION ASSEMBLY EA 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $69,000.00 $69,000.00 77 COMBINATION AIR VALVE EA 2 $9,950.00 $19,900.00 $13,650.00 $27,300.00 78 PRESSURE TEST LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 79 PIPELINE DISINFECTION AND TESTING LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 80 ADJUST MONUMENT COVER TO GRADE EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $3,255.00 $6,510.00 81 TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE LF 239 $75.00 $17,925.00 $18.00 $4,302.00 82 SECURITY FENCE LF 231 $100.00 $23,100.00 $72.00 $16,632.00 83 RECONSTRUCT CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 227 $50.00 $11,350.00 $70.00 $15,890.00 84 RESET GATE EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 85 OBJECT MARKER (TYPE P) EA 10 $50.00 $500.00 $130.00 $1,300.00 86 REMOVE ROADSIDE SIGN EA 6 $250.00 $1,500.00 $40.00 $240.00 87 RESET ROADSIDE SIGN (ONE POST) EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $230.00 $460.00 88 RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN-ONE POST EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $230.00 $230.00 89 ROADSIDE SIGN - ONE POST EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $530.00 $3,180.00 90 MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM (WOOD POST) LF 25 $36.00 $900.00 $105.00 $2,625.00 91 (F) CHAIN LINK RAILING LF 5 $60.00 $300.00 $370.00 $1,850.00 92 (F) TUBULAR HANDRAILING LF 124 $100.00 $12,400.00 $103.00 $12,772.00 93 TUBULAR BICYCLE HANDRAILING LF 114 $130.00 $14,820.00 $205.00 $23,370.00 94 TRANSITION RAILING (TYPE WB-31) EA 2 $7,000.00 $14,000.00 $6,650.00 $13,300.00 95 ALTERNATIVE IN-LINE TERMINAL SYSTEM EA 2 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 96 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 732SW) LF 124 $600.00 $74,400.00 $927.00 $114,948.00 97 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 836) LF 114 $650.00 $74,100.00 $515.00 $58,710.00 98 THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE (SPRAYABLE) LF 3227 $3.00 $9,681.00 $2.00 $6,454.00 99 REMOVE THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 1075 $2.00 $2,150.00 $7.00 $7,525.00 100 CITY OF REDDING TYPE 3E BOX EA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,300.00 $4,600.00 101 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $325,550.00 $325,550.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $3,362,321.00 $4,748,526.00
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND STAKING LS 1
2 LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1
3 PROGRESS SCHEDULE (CRITICAL PATH METHOD) LS 1
4 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS LS 1
5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1
6 TYPE III BARRICADE EA 15
7 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING (PAINT) SQFT 48
8 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC STRIPE (PAINT) LF 3266
9 CHANNELIZER (SURFACE MOUNTED) EA 82
10 TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1
11 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EA 3
12 TEMPORARY RAILING (TYPE K) LF 1280
13 TEMPORARY ALTERNATIVE CRASH CUSHION EA 7
14 JOB SITE MANAGEMENT LS 1
15 PREPARE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN LS 1
16 MOVE-IN/MOVE-OUT (TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL) EA 2
17 TEMPORARY HYDRAULIC MULCH (BONDED FIBER
MATRIX) SQYD 700
18 TEMPORARY FIBER ROLL LF 553
19 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 200
20 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 2
21 STREET SWEEPING LS 1
22 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT LS 1
23 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT EA 10
24 WATER QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT EA 2
25 TEMPORARY CREEK DIVERSION SYSTEMS LS 1
26 ASBESTOS COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1
27 REMOVE YELLOW PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE
(HAZARDOUS WASTE) LF 827
28 CONTRACTOR-SUPPLIED BIOLOGIST LS 1
29 TEMPORARY HIGH-VISIBILITY FENCE LF 153
30 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (LS) LS 1
31 (F) ROADWAY EXCAVATION CY 575
32 ROADWAY EXCAVATION (TYPE Z-2) (AERIALLY
DEPOSITED LEAD) CY 120
33 (F) STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (TYPE D) CY 331
Stewart Engineering, Inc.

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$29,000.00 $29,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
$17,500.00 $17,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
$5,700.00 $5,700.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
$70,000.00 $70,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
$101.00 $1,515.00 $100.00 $1,500.00
$12.00 $576.00 $27.00 $1,296.00
$3.50 $11,431.00 $4.00 $13,064.00
$36.00 $2,952.00 $75.00 $6,150.00
$48,000.00 $48,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.00
$13,000.00 $39,000.00 $15,000.00 $45,000.00
$79.00 $101,120.00 $75.00 $96,000.00
$6,400.00 $44,800.00 $6,500.00 $45,500.00
$64,000.00 $64,000.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00
$9,800.00 $9,800.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
$1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,300.00 $2,600.00
$3.37 $2,359.00 $3.50 $2,450.00
$9.00 $4,977.00 $13.00 $7,189.00
$14.00 $2,800.00 $16.00 $3,200.00
$4,950.00 $9,900.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00
$77,600.00 $77,600.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
$21,700.00 $21,700.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
$1,395.00 $13,950.00 $100.00 $1,000.00
$1,395.00 $2,790.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
$247,800.00 $247,800.00 $120,450.00 $120,450.00
$2,900.00 $2,900.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00
$9.00 $7,443.00 $8.00 $6,616.00
$21,200.00 $21,200.00 $210,000.00 $210,000.00
$12.00 $1,836.00 $25.00 $3,825.00
$9,100.00 $9,100.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00
$81.00 $46,575.00 $125.00 $71,875.00
$639.00 $76,680.00 $275.00 $33,000.00
$209.00 $69,179.00 $765.00 $253,215.00
Viking Construction Company
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
34 (F) STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) CY 140
35 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 340
36 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 170
37 BONDED FIBER MATRIX SQFT 5918
38 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE CY 487
39 HOT MIX ASPHALT (TYPE A) TON 886
40 TACK COAT TON 2.58
41 COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 2723
42 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 1) LS 1
43 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 3) LS 1
44 TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY LS 1
45 30" CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING LF 1450
46 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE FOOTING CY 45
47 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE CY 135
48 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE (POLYMER FIBER) CY 181 49 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, APPROACH SLAB (TYPE EQ) CY 33 50 (F) MINOR CONCRETE (MINOR STRUCTURE) CY 15
51 JOINT SEAL (MR 1") LF 107
52 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE) LB 134053
53 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (GALVANIZED) LB 798
54 BRIDGE REMOVAL LS 1
55 REMOVE PIPE LF 55
56 REMOVE ASBESTOS CONCRETE WATERLINE LF 247
57 REMOVE DRAINAGE JUNCTION STRUCTURE EA 1
58 RECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 2
59 CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 1
60 ADJUST FRAME AND COVER TO GRADE EA 2
61 ADJUST WATER VALVE TO GRADE EA 3
62 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (300 lb, Class IV, METHOD B) CY 165 63 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (20 lb, Class I, METHOD B) CY 2.2 64 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION FABRIC (CLASS 8) SQYD 275
65 MINOR CONCRETE (CURB AND GUTTER) CY 44
66 MINOR CONCRETE (DRIVEWAY) CY 15
67 MINOR CONCRETE (SIDEWALK) CY 26
68 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY CY 15
Stewart Engineering, Inc.

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
Viking Construction Company
$370.00 $51,800.00 $300.00 $42,000.00
$40.00 $13,600.00 $50.00 $17,000.00
$39.00 $6,630.00 $40.00 $6,800.00
$1.00 $5,918.00 $1.05 $6,213.90
$157.00 $76,459.00 $100.00 $48,700.00
$231.00 $204,666.00 $175.00 $155,050.00
$756.00 $1,950.48 $1,000.00 $2,580.00
$8.00 $21,784.00 $18.00 $49,014.00
$114,600.00 $114,600.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
$57,500.00 $57,500.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
$55,000.00 $55,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
$407.00 $590,150.00 $500.00 $725,000.00
$1,300.00 $58,500.00 $2,500.00 $112,500.00
$2,203.00 $297,405.00 $3,000.00 $405,000.00
$3,073.00 $556,213.00 $3,000.00 $543,000.00
$1,940.00 $64,020.00 $3,200.00 $105,600.00
$952.00 $14,280.00 $2,250.00 $33,750.00
$109.00 $11,663.00 $175.00 $18,725.00
$2.10 $281,511.30 $2.25 $301,619.25
$4.10 $3,271.80 $4.00 $3,192.00
$139,000.00 $139,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
$51.00 $2,805.00 $190.00 $10,450.00
$442.00 $109,174.00 $120.00 $29,640.00
$4,471.00 $4,471.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00
$5,411.00 $10,822.00 $12,500.00 $25,000.00
$12,665.00 $12,665.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00
$2,412.00 $4,824.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
$752.00 $2,256.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00
$208.00 $34,320.00 $275.00 $45,375.00
$300.00 $660.00 $725.00 $1,595.00
$10.00 $2,750.00 $5.00 $1,375.00
$1,040.00 $45,760.00 $1,500.00 $66,000.00
$650.00 $9,750.00 $1,650.00 $24,750.00
$1,287.00 $33,462.00 $1,650.00 $42,900.00
$230.00 $3,450.00 $550.00 $8,250.00
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
69 REMOVE CONCRETE (CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK) LF 628
70 (F) MISCELLANEOUS METAL (BRIDGE) LB 2225
71 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS (TEMPORARY WATERLINE) LF 235
72 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS LF 229
73 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 2
74 20" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 3
75 4" BLOWOFF VALVE EA 1
76 FORCE BALANCED EXPANSION ASSEMBLY EA 1
77 COMBINATION AIR VALVE EA 2
78 PRESSURE TEST LS 1
79 PIPELINE DISINFECTION AND TESTING LS 1
80 ADJUST MONUMENT COVER TO GRADE EA 2
81 TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE LF 239
82 SECURITY FENCE LF 231
83 RECONSTRUCT CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 227
84 RESET GATE EA 2
85 OBJECT MARKER (TYPE P) EA 10
86 REMOVE ROADSIDE SIGN EA 6
87 RESET ROADSIDE SIGN (ONE POST) EA 2
88 RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN-ONE POST EA 1
89 ROADSIDE SIGN - ONE POST EA 6
90 MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM (WOOD POST) LF 25
91 (F) CHAIN LINK RAILING LF 5
92 (F) TUBULAR HANDRAILING LF 124
93 TUBULAR BICYCLE HANDRAILING LF 114
94 TRANSITION RAILING (TYPE WB-31) EA 2
95 ALTERNATIVE IN-LINE TERMINAL SYSTEM EA 2
96 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 732SW) LF 124
97 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 836) LF 114
98 THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE (SPRAYABLE) LF 3227
99 REMOVE THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 1075
100 CITY OF REDDING TYPE 3E BOX EA 2
101 MOBILIZATION LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Stewart Engineering, Inc.

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
Viking Construction Company
$20.50 $12,874.00 $52.00 $32,656.00
$27.00 $60,075.00 $26.00 $57,850.00
$1,339.00 $314,665.00 $575.00 $135,125.00
$1,511.00 $346,019.00 $850.00 $194,650.00
$14,415.00 $28,830.00 $18,000.00 $36,000.00
$21,600.00 $64,800.00 $22,000.00 $66,000.00
$29,760.00 $29,760.00 $19,000.00 $19,000.00
$66,492.00 $66,492.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
$9,590.00 $19,180.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00
$17,700.00 $17,700.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00
$31,050.00 $31,050.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00
$1,360.00 $2,720.00 $2,750.00 $5,500.00
$19.00 $4,541.00 $20.00 $4,780.00
$73.00 $16,863.00 $65.00 $15,015.00
$72.00 $16,344.00 $65.00 $14,755.00
$2,960.00 $5,920.00 $2,750.00 $5,500.00
$87.00 $870.00 $75.00 $750.00
$140.00 $840.00 $120.00 $720.00
$349.00 $698.00 $300.00 $600.00
$727.00 $727.00 $625.00 $625.00
$727.00 $4,362.00 $625.00 $3,750.00
$105.00 $2,625.00 $100.00 $2,500.00
$378.00 $1,890.00 $350.00 $1,750.00
$106.00 $13,144.00 $100.00 $12,400.00
$209.00 $23,826.00 $200.00 $22,800.00
$6,750.00 $13,500.00 $6,000.00 $12,000.00
$4,011.00 $8,022.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00
$429.00 $53,196.00 $725.00 $89,900.00
$317.00 $36,138.00 $355.00 $40,470.00
$2.50 $8,067.50 $2.50 $8,067.50
$6.50 $6,987.50 $6.00 $6,450.00
$5,300.00 $10,600.00 $10,500.00 $21,000.00
$586,000.00 $586,000.00 $621,000.00 $621,000.00
$5,784,599.58 $6,210,622.65
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND STAKING LS 1
2 LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1
3 PROGRESS SCHEDULE (CRITICAL PATH METHOD) LS 1
4 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS LS 1
5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1
6 TYPE III BARRICADE EA 15
7 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING (PAINT) SQFT 48
8 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC STRIPE (PAINT) LF 3266
9 CHANNELIZER (SURFACE MOUNTED) EA 82
10 TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1
11 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EA 3
12 TEMPORARY RAILING (TYPE K) LF 1280
13 TEMPORARY ALTERNATIVE CRASH CUSHION EA 7
14 JOB SITE MANAGEMENT LS 1
15 PREPARE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN LS 1
16 MOVE-IN/MOVE-OUT (TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL) EA 2
17 TEMPORARY HYDRAULIC MULCH (BONDED FIBER
MATRIX) SQYD 700
18 TEMPORARY FIBER ROLL LF 553
19 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 200
20 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 2
21 STREET SWEEPING LS 1
22 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT LS 1
23 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT EA 10
24 WATER QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT EA 2
25 TEMPORARY CREEK DIVERSION SYSTEMS LS 1
26 ASBESTOS COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1
27 REMOVE YELLOW PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE
(HAZARDOUS WASTE) LF 827
28 CONTRACTOR-SUPPLIED BIOLOGIST LS 1
29 TEMPORARY HIGH-VISIBILITY FENCE LF 153
30 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (LS) LS 1
31 (F) ROADWAY EXCAVATION CY 575
32 ROADWAY EXCAVATION (TYPE Z-2) (AERIALLY
DEPOSITED LEAD) CY 120
33 (F) STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (TYPE D) CY 331
S.T. Rhoades Construction Inc

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$57,500.00 $57,500.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
$6,500.00 $6,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
$16,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
$4,055.00 $4,055.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
$117,226.00 $117,226.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00
$92.00 $1,380.00 $100.00 $1,500.00
$25.00 $1,200.00 $25.00 $1,200.00
$3.00 $9,798.00 $3.00 $9,798.00
$24.99 $2,049.18 $70.00 $5,740.00
$80,040.00 $80,040.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
$16,560.00 $49,680.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00
$110.40 $141,312.00 $75.00 $96,000.00
$13,041.00 $91,287.00 $3,000.00 $21,000.00
$77,487.00 $77,487.00 $39,000.00 $39,000.00
$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,750.00 $4,750.00
$1,300.00 $2,600.00 $500.00 $1,000.00
$2.90 $2,030.00 $7.50 $5,250.00
$14.49 $8,012.97 $6.00 $3,318.00
$19.84 $3,968.00 $6.00 $1,200.00
$12,075.00 $24,150.00 $2,650.00 $5,300.00
$38,870.00 $38,870.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00
$6,555.00 $6,555.00 $800.00 $800.00
$500.00 $5,000.00 $800.00 $8,000.00
$1,000.00 $2,000.00 $700.00 $1,400.00
$113,275.00 $113,275.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00
$6,500.00 $6,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00
$7.50 $6,202.50 $7.50 $6,202.50
$25,460.00 $25,460.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
$20.70 $3,167.10 $10.00 $1,530.00
$6,325.00 $6,325.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
$161.00 $92,575.00 $200.00 $115,000.00
$601.45 $72,174.00 $498.00 $59,760.00
$218.50 $72,323.50 $350.00 $115,850.00
McCuen Construction, Inc.

Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
34 (F) STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) CY 140
35 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 340
36 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 170
37 BONDED FIBER MATRIX SQFT 5918
38 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE CY 487
39 HOT MIX ASPHALT (TYPE A) TON 886
40 TACK COAT TON 2.58
41 COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 2723
42 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 1) LS 1
43 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 3) LS 1
44 TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY LS 1
45 30" CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING LF 1450
46 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE FOOTING CY 45
47 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE CY 135
48 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE (POLYMER FIBER) CY 181 49 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, APPROACH SLAB (TYPE EQ) CY 33 50 (F) MINOR CONCRETE (MINOR STRUCTURE) CY 15
51 JOINT SEAL (MR 1") LF 107
52 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE) LB 134053
53 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (GALVANIZED) LB 798
54 BRIDGE REMOVAL LS 1
55 REMOVE PIPE LF 55
56 REMOVE ASBESTOS CONCRETE WATERLINE LF 247
57 REMOVE DRAINAGE JUNCTION STRUCTURE EA 1
58 RECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 2
59 CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 1
60 ADJUST FRAME AND COVER TO GRADE EA 2
61 ADJUST WATER VALVE TO GRADE EA 3
62 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (300 lb, Class IV, METHOD B) CY 165 63 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (20 lb, Class I, METHOD B) CY 2.2 64 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION FABRIC (CLASS 8) SQYD 275
65 MINOR CONCRETE (CURB AND GUTTER) CY 44
66 MINOR CONCRETE (DRIVEWAY) CY 15
67 MINOR CONCRETE (SIDEWALK) CY 26
68 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY CY 15
S.T. Rhoades Construction Inc

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
McCuen Construction, Inc.
$446.20 $62,468.00 $875.00 $122,500.00
$53.42 $18,162.80 $55.00 $18,700.00
$50.14 $8,523.80 $65.00 $11,050.00
$1.07 $6,332.26 $1.24 $7,338.32
$198.09 $96,469.83 $205.00 $99,835.00
$182.29 $161,508.94 $198.00 $175,428.00
$1,939.21 $5,003.16 $950.00 $2,451.00
$4.27 $11,627.21 $2.25 $6,126.75
$258,750.00 $258,750.00 $275,000.00 $275,000.00
$270,250.00 $270,250.00 $151,500.00 $151,500.00
$11,293.00 $11,293.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00
$791.19 $1,147,225.50 $570.00 $826,500.00
$1,507.65 $67,844.25 $2,750.00 $123,750.00
$2,140.15 $288,920.25 $6,000.00 $810,000.00
$2,457.98 $444,894.38 $900.00 $162,900.00
$2,363.25 $77,987.25 $3,500.00 $115,500.00
$3,390.20 $50,853.00 $2,000.00 $30,000.00
$184.00 $19,688.00 $120.00 $12,840.00
$1.89 $253,360.17 $3.00 $402,159.00
$3.35 $2,673.30 $6.00 $4,788.00
$110,000.00 $110,000.00 $425,000.00 $425,000.00
$59.80 $3,289.00 $65.00 $3,575.00
$115.00 $28,405.00 $200.00 $49,400.00
$2,645.00 $2,645.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00
$6,474.50 $12,949.00 $6,500.00 $13,000.00
$8,774.50 $8,774.50 $9,000.00 $9,000.00
$2,875.00 $5,750.00 $1,750.00 $3,500.00
$1,092.50 $3,277.50 $1,400.00 $4,200.00
$304.75 $50,283.75 $330.00 $54,450.00
$2,242.50 $4,933.50 $450.00 $990.00
$4.83 $1,328.25 $9.00 $2,475.00
$1,989.50 $87,538.00 $1,200.00 $52,800.00
$1,406.45 $21,096.75 $1,100.00 $16,500.00
$1,734.20 $45,089.20 $1,200.00 $31,200.00
$345.00 $5,175.00 $200.00 $3,000.00
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
69 REMOVE CONCRETE (CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK) LF 628
70 (F) MISCELLANEOUS METAL (BRIDGE) LB 2225
71 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS (TEMPORARY WATERLINE) LF 235
72 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS LF 229
73 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 2
74 20" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 3
75 4" BLOWOFF VALVE EA 1
76 FORCE BALANCED EXPANSION ASSEMBLY EA 1
77 COMBINATION AIR VALVE EA 2
78 PRESSURE TEST LS 1
79 PIPELINE DISINFECTION AND TESTING LS 1
80 ADJUST MONUMENT COVER TO GRADE EA 2
81 TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE LF 239
82 SECURITY FENCE LF 231
83 RECONSTRUCT CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 227
84 RESET GATE EA 2
85 OBJECT MARKER (TYPE P) EA 10
86 REMOVE ROADSIDE SIGN EA 6
87 RESET ROADSIDE SIGN (ONE POST) EA 2
88 RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN-ONE POST EA 1
89 ROADSIDE SIGN - ONE POST EA 6
90 MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM (WOOD POST) LF 25
91 (F) CHAIN LINK RAILING LF 5
92 (F) TUBULAR HANDRAILING LF 124
93 TUBULAR BICYCLE HANDRAILING LF 114
94 TRANSITION RAILING (TYPE WB-31) EA 2
95 ALTERNATIVE IN-LINE TERMINAL SYSTEM EA 2
96 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 732SW) LF 124
97 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 836) LF 114
98 THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE (SPRAYABLE) LF 3227
99 REMOVE THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 1075
100 CITY OF REDDING TYPE 3E BOX EA 2
101 MOBILIZATION LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
S.T. Rhoades Construction Inc

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
McCuen Construction, Inc.
$17.25 $10,833.00 $19.00 $11,932.00
$3.45 $7,676.25 $35.00 $77,875.00
$563.50 $132,422.50 $750.00 $176,250.00
$832.60 $190,665.40 $915.00 $209,535.00
$7,831.50 $15,663.00 $5,200.00 $10,400.00
$11,849.60 $35,548.80 $12,500.00 $37,500.00
$21,275.00 $21,275.00 $12,900.00 $12,900.00
$54,395.00 $54,395.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
$9,430.00 $18,860.00 $4,990.00 $9,980.00
$28,750.00 $28,750.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
$54,395.00 $54,395.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00
$1,265.00 $2,530.00 $1,350.00 $2,700.00
$65.00 $15,535.00 $16.00 $3,824.00
$86.00 $19,866.00 $62.50 $14,437.50
$61.50 $13,960.50 $61.50 $13,960.50
$2,550.00 $5,100.00 $2,550.00 $5,100.00
$115.00 $1,150.00 $125.00 $1,250.00
$35.00 $210.00 $50.00 $300.00
$200.00 $400.00 $200.00 $400.00
$200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00
$465.00 $2,790.00 $500.00 $3,000.00
$90.00 $2,250.00 $90.00 $2,250.00
$325.00 $1,625.00 $325.00 $1,625.00
$91.00 $11,284.00 $91.00 $11,284.00
$180.00 $20,520.00 $180.00 $20,520.00
$5,800.00 $11,600.00 $5,800.00 $11,600.00
$3,450.00 $6,900.00 $3,450.00 $6,900.00
$535.11 $66,353.64 $500.00 $62,000.00
$359.59 $40,993.26 $375.00 $42,750.00
$2.10 $6,776.70 $2.10 $6,776.70
$5.60 $6,020.00 $5.60 $6,020.00
$4,025.00 $8,050.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00
$630,940.00 $630,940.00 $670,000.00 $670,000.00
$6,251,609.85 $6,765,524.27
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND STAKING LS 1
2 LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1
3 PROGRESS SCHEDULE (CRITICAL PATH METHOD) LS 1
4 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS LS 1
5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1
6 TYPE III BARRICADE EA 15
7 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING (PAINT) SQFT 48
8 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC STRIPE (PAINT) LF 3266
9 CHANNELIZER (SURFACE MOUNTED) EA 82
10 TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM LS 1
11 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EA 3
12 TEMPORARY RAILING (TYPE K) LF 1280
13 TEMPORARY ALTERNATIVE CRASH CUSHION EA 7
14 JOB SITE MANAGEMENT LS 1
15 PREPARE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN LS 1
16 MOVE-IN/MOVE-OUT (TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL) EA 2
17 TEMPORARY HYDRAULIC MULCH (BONDED FIBER
MATRIX) SQYD 700
18 TEMPORARY FIBER ROLL LF 553
19 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LF 200
20 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 2
21 STREET SWEEPING LS 1
22 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT LS 1
23 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT EA 10
24 WATER QUALITY ANNUAL REPORT EA 2
25 TEMPORARY CREEK DIVERSION SYSTEMS LS 1
26 ASBESTOS COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1
27 REMOVE YELLOW PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE
(HAZARDOUS WASTE) LF 827
28 CONTRACTOR-SUPPLIED BIOLOGIST LS 1
29 TEMPORARY HIGH-VISIBILITY FENCE LF 153
30 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (LS) LS 1
31 (F) ROADWAY EXCAVATION CY 575
32 ROADWAY EXCAVATION (TYPE Z-2) (AERIALLY
DEPOSITED LEAD) CY 120
33 (F) STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (TYPE D) CY 331

AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00
$0.00 $0.00 $4,356.00
$0.00 $0.00 $13,980.00
$0.00 $0.00 $4,451.00
$0.00 $0.00 $158,445.20
$0.00 $0.00 $103.60
$0.00 $0.00 $23.60
$0.00 $0.00 $3.40
$0.00 $0.00 $57.20
$0.00 $0.00 $56,408.00
$0.00 $0.00 $13,647.00
$0.00 $0.00 $77.68
$0.00 $0.00 $6,016.20
$0.00 $0.00 $67,697.40
$0.00 $0.00 $5,980.00
$0.00 $0.00 $1,034.00
$0.00 $0.00 $5.15
$0.00 $0.00 $9.90
$0.00 $0.00 $12.57
$0.00 $0.00 $6,650.00
$0.00 $0.00 $36,494.00
$0.00 $0.00 $11,147.00
$0.00 $0.00 $673.00
$0.00 $0.00 $1,047.00
$0.00 $0.00 $141,705.00
$0.00 $0.00 $5,050.00
$0.00 $0.00 $8.20
$0.00 $0.00 $63,332.00
$0.00 $0.00 $15.74
$0.00 $0.00 $33,085.00
$0.00 $0.00 $124.00
$0.00 $0.00 $431.49
$0.00 $0.00 $353.10
JS Builders, Inc.**
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
34 (F) STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) CY 140
35 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 340
36 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT LF 170
37 BONDED FIBER MATRIX SQFT 5918
38 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE CY 487
39 HOT MIX ASPHALT (TYPE A) TON 886
40 TACK COAT TON 2.58
41 COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 2723
42 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 1) LS 1
43 TEMPORARY SHORING (STAGE 3) LS 1
44 TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY LS 1
45 30" CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING LF 1450
46 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE FOOTING CY 45
47 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE CY 135
48 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE (POLYMER FIBER) CY 181 49 (F) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, APPROACH SLAB (TYPE EQ) CY 33 50 (F) MINOR CONCRETE (MINOR STRUCTURE) CY 15
51 JOINT SEAL (MR 1") LF 107
52 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE) LB 134053
53 (F) BAR REINFORCING STEEL (GALVANIZED) LB 798
54 BRIDGE REMOVAL LS 1
55 REMOVE PIPE LF 55
56 REMOVE ASBESTOS CONCRETE WATERLINE LF 247
57 REMOVE DRAINAGE JUNCTION STRUCTURE EA 1
58 RECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 2
59 CATCH BASIN NO.3 EA 1
60 ADJUST FRAME AND COVER TO GRADE EA 2
61 ADJUST WATER VALVE TO GRADE EA 3
62 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (300 lb, Class IV, METHOD B) CY 165 63 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (20 lb, Class I, METHOD B) CY 2.2 64 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION FABRIC (CLASS 8) SQYD 275
65 MINOR CONCRETE (CURB AND GUTTER) CY 44
66 MINOR CONCRETE (DRIVEWAY) CY 15
67 MINOR CONCRETE (SIDEWALK) CY 26
68 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY CY 15

AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE
JS Builders, Inc.**
$0.00 $0.00 $529.24
$0.00 $0.00 $42.68
$0.00 $0.00 $39.53
$0.00 $0.00 $1.17
$0.00 $0.00 $151.02
$0.00 $0.00 $184.06
$0.00 $0.00 $1,089.04
$0.00 $0.00 $7.30
$0.00 $0.00 $149,870.00
$0.00 $0.00 $105,370.00
$0.00 $0.00 $41,958.60
$0.00 $0.00 $539.04
$0.00 $0.00 $1,991.53
$0.00 $0.00 $3,127.63
$0.00 $0.00 $2,343.20
$0.00 $0.00 $2,748.65
$0.00 $0.00 $2,263.44
$0.00 $0.00 $139.60
$0.00 $0.00 $2.25
$0.00 $0.00 $4.29
$0.00 $0.00 $189,800.00
$0.00 $0.00 $94.96
$0.00 $0.00 $189.80
$0.00 $0.00 $4,863.20
$0.00 $0.00 $9,977.10
$0.00 $0.00 $12,587.90
$0.00 $0.00 $2,507.40
$0.00 $0.00 $1,848.90
$0.00 $0.00 $282.55
$0.00 $0.00 $1,443.50
$0.00 $0.00 $7.17
$0.00 $0.00 $1,423.90
$0.00 $0.00 $1,221.29
$0.00 $0.00 $1,434.24
$0.00 $0.00 $445.00
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek BID TABULATION FOR:

Westside Road Over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement Bid Schedule No.: 5470
Job No.: 2475

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
69 REMOVE CONCRETE (CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK) LF 628
70 (F) MISCELLANEOUS METAL (BRIDGE) LB 2225
71 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS (TEMPORARY WATERLINE) LF 235
72 20" CLASS 250 DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERLINE AND
FITTINGS LF 229
73 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 2
74 20" BUTTERFLY VALVE ASSEMBLY EA 3
75 4" BLOWOFF VALVE EA 1
76 FORCE BALANCED EXPANSION ASSEMBLY EA 1
77 COMBINATION AIR VALVE EA 2
78 PRESSURE TEST LS 1
79 PIPELINE DISINFECTION AND TESTING LS 1
80 ADJUST MONUMENT COVER TO GRADE EA 2
81 TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCE LF 239
82 SECURITY FENCE LF 231
83 RECONSTRUCT CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 227
84 RESET GATE EA 2
85 OBJECT MARKER (TYPE P) EA 10
86 REMOVE ROADSIDE SIGN EA 6
87 RESET ROADSIDE SIGN (ONE POST) EA 2
88 RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN-ONE POST EA 1
89 ROADSIDE SIGN - ONE POST EA 6
90 MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM (WOOD POST) LF 25
91 (F) CHAIN LINK RAILING LF 5
92 (F) TUBULAR HANDRAILING LF 124
93 TUBULAR BICYCLE HANDRAILING LF 114
94 TRANSITION RAILING (TYPE WB-31) EA 2
95 ALTERNATIVE IN-LINE TERMINAL SYSTEM EA 2
96 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 732SW) LF 124
97 (F) CONCRETE BARRIER (TYPE 836) LF 114
98 THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE (SPRAYABLE) LF 3227
99 REMOVE THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 1075
100 CITY OF REDDING TYPE 3E BOX EA 2
101 MOBILIZATION LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS

AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE
JS Builders, Inc.**
$0.00 $0.00 $26.15
$0.00 $0.00 $23.89
$0.00 $0.00 $822.10
$0.00 $0.00 $1,081.72
$0.00 $0.00 $11,339.30
$0.00 $0.00 $17,289.92
$0.00 $0.00 $20,187.00
$0.00 $0.00 $59,977.40
$0.00 $0.00 $9,532.00
$0.00 $0.00 $13,190.00
$0.00 $0.00 $25,189.00
$0.00 $0.00 $1,996.00
$0.00 $0.00 $27.60
$0.00 $0.00 $71.70
$0.00 $0.00 $66.00
$0.00 $0.00 $2,762.00
$0.00 $0.00 $106.40
$0.00 $0.00 $77.00
$0.00 $0.00 $255.80
$0.00 $0.00 $396.40
$0.00 $0.00 $569.40
$0.00 $0.00 $98.00
$0.00 $0.00 $349.60
$0.00 $0.00 $98.20
$0.00 $0.00 $194.80
$0.00 $0.00 $6,200.00
$0.00 $0.00 $3,682.20
$0.00 $0.00 $623.22
$0.00 $0.00 $384.32
$0.00 $0.00 $2.24
$0.00 $0.00 $6.14
$0.00 $0.00 $5,425.00
$0.00 $0.00 $561,588.00
Average Bid Total
$0.00 $5,952,176.47
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. **Bidder deemed non-responsive Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND), the Mitigation Monitoring Program ( MMP), and approve the Eastside Road and Westside Road Bridges Replacement Project ( Project) as described, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA Guidelines §15074).

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program MMP) allows the project to move toward the final design and construction phases. There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program.

The Eastside Road bridge replacement is estimated to cost $ 2,683, 200, and the Westside Road bridge replacement is estimated to cost $2,985,612. Approximately 88 percent of the cost for the Project will be funded through a grant from the Federal Highway Bridge Program. The remaining $650,000 will be a local match from the Traffic Impact Fee Program.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) can choose to not adopt the MND and the MMP. Without approval, the project would not proceed, as it would not be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Future opportunities for Highway Bridge Program grant funding would also be jeopardized.

MEETING DATE: June 16, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
[email protected] btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Adoption of the Eastside Road and Westside Road Bridges Replacement Project, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation and Monitoring Program Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-16-2020 (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement) Report to Redding City Council June 8, 2020
Re: 4.11( b)--Eastside Road and Westside Road Bridges Replacement Project Page 2 Background/Analysis
The project is located on the east side and west side of State Route 273, respectively, approximately 650 feet south of the intersection of State Route 273 and Buenaventura Boulevard. The project will replace the existing Eastside Road Bridge with a new two-lane, twospan cast- in-place reinforced concrete slab- bridge. The proposed structure will provide two 12- foot travel lanes, 8-foot shoulders, one 6-foot wide sidewalk, and concrete barriers.

Approximately 300 feet of roadway will be reconstructed at both approaches to conform to the new bridge.

The Westside Road Bridge will be replaced with a new two- lane, three- span cast- in-place reinforced concrete slab-bridge. The proposed bridge will provide two 12-foot travel lanes, 4- foot shoulders, one 6-foot wide sidewalk, and barriers. The roadway will be reconstructed approximately 175 feet to the south and 325 feet to the north to conform to the new bridge.

Construction of both bridges will be staged to allow a single lane of alternating traffic, controlled by temporary signals.

The in-channel work area extends approximately 25 feet upstream and downstream of the new bridges to allow access into the channel during construction and underground utility relocations.

Additional project work includes extending the sidewalk along select approaches, storm drain modification, paving, striping, and sign installation. Specifically, Pacific Gas and Electric PG& E) gas lines, City of Redding (City) water lines, and AT&T underground phone and fiber lines would require relocation at the proposed Eastside Road Bridge and Westside Road Bridge.

The PG&E gas line relocations and AT&T underground will require trench excavation depths up to approximately 12 feet deep.

Two staging areas are proposed for the project. The first staging area is within a disturbed dirt area located at the northeast quadrant of the Eastside Road Bridge. The second staging area is a paved section of abandoned roadway located 130 feet north of the Westside Road Bridge.

Roadway and structure improvements fall within City and private right -of-way. It is anticipated the project will require temporary construction easements, and encroachment permits/agreements will be obtained from California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) and the Union Pacific Railroad for construction access. The Westside Road Bridge is anticipated to be built in 2021 , and would require two seasons of construction. The Eastside Road Bridge is anticipated to be constructed in 2022, and would also require two seasons of construction.

An Initial Study ( IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the CEQA. It describes why the project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed project could have a significant effect on biological resources, but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The mitigation measures and conservation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre-construction surveys, impact minimization, exclusionary fencing, and erosion control.

Based on the conclusions made in the IS, a MND was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project. In addition, a MMP has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.

Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-16-2020 (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement) Report to Redding City Council June 8, 2020
Re: 4.11( b)--Eastside Road and Westside Road Bridges Replacement Project Page 3 The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. Two comment letters were received during the public comment period. Responses to the comment letters have been prepared and are attached to the final MND.

The City is the lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section §18.24.070.E and state law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk’ s Office and the State Clearinghouse, completing the environmental review process.

The IS/MND is available in the City Clerk’ s office for review and is also available online at https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/environmental-management.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Location Map
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation Monitoring Program ( available online)
Eastside & Westside Bridges Initial Study May 2020 ( available online) Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 6-16-2020 (4.11(b)--Award BS No 5470 Westside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Bridge Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to submit a grant application to the United States Department of Transportation for the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Grant Program in the amount of $25 million for the South Bonnyview Diverging Diamond Interchange and Corridor Capacity Improvement Project.

Fiscal Impact
If the City of Redding (City) is awarded United States Department of Transportation grant funding, the required local matching funds would vary dependent upon certain community characteristics specified in the Notice of Funding Opportunity. The South Bonnyview Road Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) and Corridor Capacity Improvement Project (Project) is eligible to use Traffic Impact Fee program funds as a local match; however, the local match fund amount will be determined at the time of the grant award. City staff will present the final award and required local match to the City Council (Council) for consideration.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to authorize this grant application and provide alternative direction to staff, in which case the City would not apply to the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) grant program. The City would miss this opportunity to receive Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funding through a competitive grant program.

Background/Analysis
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was signed into law November 2021, which made additional funding for infrastructure, including roads, harbors, rail networks, and other transportation, available through a number of grant programs. Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the BUILD Program was formerly known as the Rebuilding American MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Approve and Authorize Grant Application Submision to the US Department of Transportation BUILD Grant Program
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 211
Report to Redding City Council February 10, 2026
Re: 4.11(c)--Authorize Grant Application - US Department of Transportation Page 2 Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grant Program which included projects such as dedicated bus lanes, highway and bridge repair, dock replacements, and rail-to-trail projects in a number of states. The BUILD program was the first discretionary funding program to accept applications tapping into the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funding. In its first year, the BUILD grant program has $1.5 billion of available funding.

Staff is requesting authorization to apply for the maximum amount of $25 million in grant funding to complete the Project. Staff have previously applied for grant funding under various program names over the last four years (with Council approval) for this project which, to date, those applications have not been successful.

The City has already made progress on portions of this project utilizing existing funding, most notably the roundabout on the western side of the project location at the intersection of South Bonnyview Road and Bechelli Lane. The remaining improvements include updates and repairs to the to the on and off ramps located at Interstate 5 at South Bonnyview Road, the DDI itself, and an additional roundabout on the eastern side of the project area at the intersection of South Bonnyview Road and Churn Creek Road. The improvements included in the project are in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee program and are critical for serving the increased economic activity in the area and new housing inventory that will see more people living near and commuting through the area. This project also benefits from being innovative in the context of the California road network. While other diverging diamond interchanges exist throughout the state, this project has the potential to be the first DDI bracketed with roundabouts on both ends. This design distinction greatly increases the traffic capacity along the corridor without the need to widen the roadway.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no action is required at this time. If a grant is awarded to the City the project will be reviewed in compliance with CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^South Bonnyview DDI Exhibit
Packet Pg. 212
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: ^South Bonnyview DDI Exhibit (4.11(c)--Authorize Grant Application - US Department of Transportation)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5667, Oregon Street Improvements:
(1) Award the project to the lowest bidder, JF Shea, in the amount of $1,312,100; (2) Approve an additional $151,900 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) Approve $351,750 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $131,200 to provide construction contingency funding; and (5) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $75,000.

Fiscal Impact
Oregon Street Improvements (Project) is being funded by two sources: (1) Clean California funds in the amount of $1,813,000; and (2) Streets funds in the amount of $209,112 for a total available budget of $2,022,112. The estimated cost of the project is $2,021,950.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $351,750
Construction Contract + Contingency $1,443,300
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $151,900
Additional City Manager Authority $75,000
Total Project Costs $2,021,950
Project Budget $2,022,112
Project cost components are estimates and allowable shifting of the project development, construction, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5667 Oregon Street Improvements Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 214
Report to Redding City Council February 9, 2026
Re: 4.11(d)--Award BS 5667 Oregon Street Improvements Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the project is not awarded, the sidewalk gaps will not be filled and trash and debris will continue to be swept into Calaboose Creek and ultimately to the Sacramento River. In addition, if the project is not awarded, the City of Redding (City) would be at risk of losing state funding due to grant requirements for project delivery.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a project tabulation of bids received and opened on January 29, 2026. The low bid in the amount of $1,312,100 was received from JF Shea of Redding, California. The engineer’s estimate was $1,657,310. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $351,750. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, and consultant services.

The project will construct improvements along Oregon Street between Yuba Street and Shasta Street. Improvements include completing sidewalk gaps with curb, gutter, and sidewalk, tie-in paving and closing in Calaboose Creek with a concrete box culvert. It will also include a midblock pedestrian crossing and associated curb ramps and other miscellaneous items.

Additionally, as part of the Clean California program, the City has previously received $298,000 for landscaping, litter abatement, and beautification along the project corridor. The City has entered into a separate contract with a local non-profit, fully funded by the grant, to achieve that program goal.

It is anticipated that the project will be completed in Fall 2026.

Environmental Review
On June 15, 2021, the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the Oregon Street Improvements Project, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines §15074). No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^Bid Tab
Staff Report 6-15-2021
Packet Pg. 215
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(d)--Award BS 5667 Oregon Street Improvements) BID TABULATION FOR:

Oregon Street Improvements
Bid Schedule No.: 5667
ENGINEER'S EST J.F. Shea Constrctuion, Inc
1/29/2026 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $7,630.00 $7,630.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $128,391.00 $128,391.00 $73,300.00 $73,300.00 3 Project Funding Sign EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $650.00 $650.00 $650.00 $650.00 4 Construction Area Signs EA 18 $1,300.00 $23,400.00 $275.00 $4,950.00 $275.00 $4,950.00 5 Remove Concrete Channel SF 1370 $40.00 $54,800.00 $5.00 $6,850.00 $11.00 $15,070.00 6 Biologist LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,640.00 $10,640.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 7 Temporary Creek Diversion System LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $14,505.00 $14,505.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 8(F) Borrow (Imported) CY 600 $90.00 $54,000.00 $100.00 $60,000.00 $125.00 $75,000.00 9(F) Excavation (Unclassified) CY 445 $150.00 $66,750.00 $76.00 $33,820.00 $180.00 $80,100.00 10 Clearing and Grub LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,020.00 $4,020.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 11 Asphalt Concrete TON 95 $265.00 $25,175.00 $223.00 $21,185.00 $260.00 $24,700.00 12(F) Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 190 $200.00 $38,000.00 $220.00 $41,800.00 $195.00 $37,050.00 13 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 905 $100.00 $90,500.00 $68.00 $61,540.00 $57.00 $51,585.00 14 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 6915 $20.00 $138,300.00 $11.00 $76,065.00 $11.00 $76,065.00 15 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 230 $90.00 $20,700.00 $59.00 $13,570.00 $45.00 $10,350.00 16 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert LF 460 $1,700.00 $782,000.00 $1,395.00 $641,700.00 $1,551.00 $713,460.00 17 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 2 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $7,840.00 $15,680.00 $9,200.00 $18,400.00 18 Area Drain EA 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $6,850.00 $6,850.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 19 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 85 $400.00 $34,000.00 $200.00 $17,000.00 $260.00 $22,100.00 20 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 45 $450.00 $20,250.00 $228.00 $10,260.00 $225.00 $10,125.00 21 Modify Manhole EA 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $4,111.00 $4,111.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 22 Remove Traffic Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 490 $3.00 $1,470.00 $6.00 $2,940.00 $6.00 $2,940.00 23 Traffic Stripe (4" Thermoplastic) LF 1205 $20.00 $24,100.00 $5.00 $6,025.00 $5.00 $6,025.00 24 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 560 $15.00 $8,400.00 $10.00 $5,600.00 $10.00 $5,600.00 25 Install Sign EA 15 $500.00 $7,500.00 $320.00 $4,800.00 $320.00 $4,800.00 26 Remove Sign EA 14 $145.00 $2,030.00 $65.00 $910.00 $65.00 $910.00 27 Remove Metal Railing LF 74 $65.00 $4,810.00 $34.00 $2,516.00 $20.00 $1,480.00 28 Water (6" PVC) LF 30 $300.00 $9,000.00 $460.00 $13,800.00 $600.00 $18,000.00 29 Water (2" WTR SVC) LF 40 $175.00 $7,000.00 $312.00 $12,480.00 $275.00 $11,000.00 30 Irrigation LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $59,885.00 $59,885.00 $37,500.00 $37,500.00 31 Adjust Valve EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,497.00 $1,497.00 $1,150.00 $1,150.00 32 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 40 $40.00 $1,600.00 $150.00 $6,000.00 $90.00 $3,600.00 33 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 65 $60.00 $3,900.00 $140.00 $9,100.00 $50.00 $3,250.00 34 Conductor (4/0) LF 65 $25.00 $1,625.00 $82.00 $5,330.00 $30.00 $1,950.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $1,657,310.00 $1,312,100.00 $1,368,510.00 S.T. Rhoades Construction,
Inc

BID TABULATION FOR:

Oregon Street Improvements
Bid Schedule No.: 5667
1/29/2026

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1
2 Traffic Control LS 1
3 Project Funding Sign EA 1
4 Construction Area Signs EA 18
5 Remove Concrete Channel SF 1370
6 Biologist LS 1
7 Temporary Creek Diversion System LS 1
8(F) Borrow (Imported) CY 600
9(F) Excavation (Unclassified) CY 445
10 Clearing and Grub LS 1
11 Asphalt Concrete TON 95
12(F) Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 190
13 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 905
14 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 6915
15 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 230
16 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert LF 460
17 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 2
18 Area Drain EA 1
19 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 85
20 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 45
21 Modify Manhole EA 1
22 Remove Traffic Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 490
23 Traffic Stripe (4" Thermoplastic) LF 1205
24 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 560
25 Install Sign EA 15
26 Remove Sign EA 14
27 Remove Metal Railing LF 74
28 Water (6" PVC) LF 30
29 Water (2" WTR SVC) LF 40
30 Irrigation LS 1
31 Adjust Valve EA 1
32 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 40
33 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 65
34 Conductor (4/0) LF 65

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$6,667.94 $6,667.94 $5,982.00 $5,982.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $43,103.01 $43,103.01 $41,453.00 $41,453.00 $135,500.00 $135,500.00 $2,310.00 $2,310.00 $1,872.00 $1,872.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $297.00 $5,346.00 $369.00 $6,642.00 $270.00 $4,860.00
$7.47 $10,233.90 $15.00 $20,550.00 $6.50 $8,905.00
$8,250.00 $8,250.00 $5,513.00 $5,513.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $26,639.91 $26,639.91 $36,791.00 $36,791.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $32.09 $19,254.00 $145.00 $87,000.00 $175.00 $105,000.00 $52.32 $23,282.40 $83.00 $36,935.00 $180.00 $80,100.00
$12,657.53 $12,657.53 $11,547.00 $11,547.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $279.63 $26,564.85 $368.00 $34,960.00 $325.00 $30,875.00 $182.63 $34,699.70 $178.00 $33,820.00 $350.00 $66,500.00 $82.06 $74,264.30 $84.00 $76,020.00 $53.00 $47,965.00
$13.40 $92,661.00 $18.00 $124,470.00 $8.00 $55,320.00
$55.98 $12,875.40 $146.00 $33,580.00 $28.00 $6,440.00
$1,580.30 $726,938.00 $1,806.00 $830,760.00 $1,700.00 $782,000.00 $7,822.92 $15,645.84 $11,111.00 $22,222.00 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $6,454.01 $6,454.01 $12,711.00 $12,711.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $195.55 $16,621.75 $322.00 $27,370.00 $250.00 $21,250.00 $162.42 $7,308.90 $288.00 $12,960.00 $375.00 $16,875.00 $8,787.05 $8,787.05 $9,482.00 $9,482.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6.60 $3,234.00 $9.00 $4,410.00 $6.00 $2,940.00
$5.50 $6,627.50 $6.00 $7,230.00 $5.00 $6,025.00
$11.00 $6,160.00 $19.00 $10,640.00 $10.00 $5,600.00
$621.50 $9,322.50 $378.00 $5,670.00 $565.00 $8,475.00
$77.12 $1,079.68 $137.00 $1,918.00 $60.00 $840.00
$22.37 $1,655.38 $21.00 $1,554.00 $30.00 $2,220.00
$1,592.97 $47,789.10 $944.00 $28,320.00 $450.00 $13,500.00 $489.71 $19,588.40 $499.00 $19,960.00 $500.00 $20,000.00 $85,500.99 $85,500.99 $32,422.00 $32,422.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $866.61 $866.61 $1,533.00 $1,533.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $98.74 $3,949.60 $84.00 $3,360.00 $70.00 $2,800.00
$118.82 $7,723.30 $83.00 $5,395.00 $80.00 $5,200.00
$17.99 $1,169.35 $27.00 $1,755.00 $80.00 $5,200.00
$1,375,231.90 $1,596,807.00 $1,600,490.00
Eddie Axner Construction,
Inc Site Work Solutions Tullis, Inc

BID TABULATION FOR:

Oregon Street Improvements
Bid Schedule No.: 5667
1/29/2026

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1
2 Traffic Control LS 1
3 Project Funding Sign EA 1
4 Construction Area Signs EA 18
5 Remove Concrete Channel SF 1370
6 Biologist LS 1
7 Temporary Creek Diversion System LS 1
8(F) Borrow (Imported) CY 600
9(F) Excavation (Unclassified) CY 445
10 Clearing and Grub LS 1
11 Asphalt Concrete TON 95
12(F) Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 190
13 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 905
14 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 6915
15 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 230
16 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert LF 460
17 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 2
18 Area Drain EA 1
19 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 85
20 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 45
21 Modify Manhole EA 1
22 Remove Traffic Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 490
23 Traffic Stripe (4" Thermoplastic) LF 1205
24 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 560
25 Install Sign EA 15
26 Remove Sign EA 14
27 Remove Metal Railing LF 74
28 Water (6" PVC) LF 30
29 Water (2" WTR SVC) LF 40
30 Irrigation LS 1
31 Adjust Valve EA 1
32 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 40
33 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 65
34 Conductor (4/0) LF 65

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Axner Excavating, Inc

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$4,985.00 $4,985.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $101,640.00 $101,640.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $780.00 $780.00 $750.00 $750.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00
$330.00 $5,940.00 $320.00 $5,760.00 $250.00 $4,500.00
$3.00 $4,110.00 $9.00 $12,330.00 $28.00 $38,360.00
$15,360.00 $15,360.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $25,652.00 $25,652.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $77.00 $46,200.00 $110.00 $66,000.00 $100.00 $60,000.00 $154.00 $68,530.00 $60.00 $26,700.00 $300.00 $133,500.00 $31,966.00 $31,966.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $341.00 $32,395.00 $380.00 $36,100.00 $330.00 $31,350.00 $141.00 $26,790.00 $170.00 $32,300.00 $125.00 $23,750.00 $72.00 $65,160.00 $75.00 $67,875.00 $75.00 $67,875.00
$12.00 $82,980.00 $14.00 $96,810.00 $24.00 $165,960.00
$48.00 $11,040.00 $32.00 $7,360.00 $80.00 $18,400.00
$2,040.00 $938,400.00 $1,825.00 $839,500.00 $1,800.00 $828,000.00 $7,920.00 $15,840.00 $18,000.00 $36,000.00 $8,750.00 $17,500.00 $6,272.00 $6,272.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $9,225.00 $9,225.00 $305.00 $25,925.00 $265.00 $22,525.00 $140.00 $11,900.00 $245.00 $11,025.00 $385.00 $17,325.00 $200.00 $9,000.00 $7,705.00 $7,705.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $8.00 $3,920.00 $6.00 $2,940.00 $8.00 $3,920.00
$6.00 $7,230.00 $5.00 $6,025.00 $6.00 $7,230.00
$12.00 $6,720.00 $10.00 $5,600.00 $12.50 $7,000.00
$384.00 $5,760.00 $320.00 $4,800.00 $550.00 $8,250.00
$78.00 $1,092.00 $65.00 $910.00 $300.00 $4,200.00
$31.00 $2,294.00 $25.00 $1,850.00 $54.00 $3,996.00
$302.00 $9,060.00 $565.00 $16,950.00 $450.00 $13,500.00 $280.00 $11,200.00 $365.00 $14,600.00 $300.00 $12,000.00 $34,431.00 $34,431.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $1,407.00 $1,407.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $125.00 $5,000.00 $265.00 $10,600.00 $195.00 $7,800.00
$137.00 $8,905.00 $210.00 $13,650.00 $240.00 $15,600.00 $96.00 $6,240.00 $110.00 $7,150.00 $98.00 $6,370.00
$1,631,954.00 $1,649,210.00 $1,649,936.00
Stimpel Wiebelhaus
Associates, Inc Snl Group, Inc

BID TABULATION FOR:

Oregon Street Improvements
Bid Schedule No.: 5667
1/29/2026

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1
2 Traffic Control LS 1
3 Project Funding Sign EA 1
4 Construction Area Signs EA 18
5 Remove Concrete Channel SF 1370
6 Biologist LS 1
7 Temporary Creek Diversion System LS 1
8(F) Borrow (Imported) CY 600
9(F) Excavation (Unclassified) CY 445
10 Clearing and Grub LS 1
11 Asphalt Concrete TON 95
12(F) Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 190
13 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 905
14 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 6915
15 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 230
16 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert LF 460
17 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 2
18 Area Drain EA 1
19 Storm Drain Pipe (15" HDPE) LF 85
20 Storm Drain Pipe (18" HDPE) LF 45
21 Modify Manhole EA 1
22 Remove Traffic Stripe (Thermoplastic) LF 490
23 Traffic Stripe (4" Thermoplastic) LF 1205
24 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 560
25 Install Sign EA 15
26 Remove Sign EA 14
27 Remove Metal Railing LF 74
28 Water (6" PVC) LF 30
29 Water (2" WTR SVC) LF 40
30 Irrigation LS 1
31 Adjust Valve EA 1
32 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 40
33 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 65
34 Conductor (4/0) LF 65

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS

AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$5,856.00 $5,856.00 $10,773.00 $10,773.00 $6,039.39
$104,780.00 $104,780.00 $139,436.00 $139,436.00 $93,760.30 $802.00 $802.00 $3,540.00 $3,540.00 $1,570.40
$339.00 $6,102.00 $1,083.00 $19,494.00 $380.80
$4.25 $5,822.50 $19.00 $26,030.00 $10.82
$10,600.00 $10,600.00 $5,775.00 $5,775.00 $12,603.80
$8,743.00 $8,743.00 $45,572.00 $45,572.00 $24,390.29
$194.00 $116,400.00 $184.00 $110,400.00 $124.21
$205.00 $91,225.00 $183.00 $81,435.00 $147.33
$23,175.00 $23,175.00 $43,226.00 $43,226.00 $21,709.15
$508.00 $48,260.00 $620.00 $58,900.00 $363.46
$87.00 $16,530.00 $306.00 $58,140.00 $195.46
$104.50 $94,572.50 $89.00 $80,545.00 $75.96
$8.70 $60,160.50 $19.00 $131,385.00 $13.91
$25.00 $5,750.00 $128.00 $29,440.00 $64.70
$2,612.00 $1,201,520.00 $1,984.00 $912,640.00 $1,829.33 $8,991.00 $17,982.00 $19,880.00 $39,760.00 $10,701.49
$9,056.00 $9,056.00 $24,592.00 $24,592.00 $9,866.00
$146.00 $12,410.00 $391.00 $33,235.00 $247.46
$212.00 $9,540.00 $582.00 $26,190.00 $290.24
$4,904.00 $4,904.00 $32,714.00 $32,714.00 $9,920.31
$7.50 $3,675.00 $8.00 $3,920.00 $7.11
$6.00 $7,230.00 $6.00 $7,230.00 $5.55
$12.50 $7,000.00 $18.00 $10,080.00 $12.50
$395.00 $5,925.00 $1,146.00 $17,190.00 $499.95
$80.00 $1,120.00 $483.00 $6,762.00 $141.01
$24.00 $1,776.00 $109.00 $8,066.00 $37.04
$364.00 $10,920.00 $1,549.00 $46,470.00 $727.70
$279.00 $11,160.00 $829.00 $33,160.00 $412.87
$58,675.00 $58,675.00 $54,287.00 $54,287.00 $50,770.10
$734.00 $734.00 $1,848.00 $1,848.00 $1,583.56
$139.00 $5,560.00 $216.00 $8,640.00 $143.27
$97.00 $6,305.00 $201.00 $13,065.00 $135.68
$13.00 $845.00 $344.00 $22,360.00 $89.80
Average Bid Total
$1,975,115.50 $2,146,300.00 $1,630,565.44
Stewart Engineering, Inc Allen Gill Construction, Inc

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND), the Mitigation Monitoring Program ( MMP), and approve the Oregon Street Improvements Project satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines § 15074).

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the project along with adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) allows the project to move toward the final design and construction phases. There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of adopting the MND and MMP.

The Oregon Street Improvements Project (Project) is currently in the project development phase funded with budgeted Streets and Roads funds. The estimated cost to construct the project is 1,500, 000 and will be funded through a combination of grants and/ or Streets and Roads funds.

Alternative Action
The City Council ( Council) may choose not to adopt the MND and/ or the MMP, and not approve the project as described. Without approval, the project would not proceed as a City of Redding City) project, as it would not be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

Background/ Analysis
The project area includes two discontinuous segments along Oregon Street: the first area is located between Yuba Street and Butte Street, and the second area is located between Tehama Street and Shasta Street. The purpose of this project is to improve pedestrian access and safety.

The project is needed because these two roadway sections do not currently have continuous sidewalk on the east side which forces pedestrians to walk on the edge of the pavement next to MEETING DATE: June 15, 2021
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
[email protected] btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4.11( c)-- Oregon Street Improvements Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Staff Report 6-15-2021 (4.11(d)--Award BS 5667 Oregon Street Improvements) Report to Redding City Council June 9, 2021
Re: 4.11( c)-- Oregon Street Improvements Project Page 2 an open channel or walk in the traveled way. Under existing conditions, some disabled pedestrians do not have any other option and must traverse the travel way. The proposed project would provide approximately 460 linear feet of 10-foot sidewalk for pedestrians, as well as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps.

There is an existing sidewalk between the two project segments. The existing section of sidewalk is built over Calaboose Creek and is in alignment with the street grid plan. Calaboose Creek functions as part of the City’s storm drain system and captures drainage from residential, commercial, and industrial uses.

In order to construct the project, approximately 460 feet of new 5-foot by 8-foot box culvert would be installed within the two open channel segments of Calaboose Creek along Oregon Street. The new sidewalk, curb, and gutter would be constructed over the subsurface box culvert.

The project includes pavement grinding and a pavement overlay; however, the project will not increase vehicle capacity as the roadway will conform to the existing sidewalk section and street grid. Utility relocation includes four utility poles, as well as AT&T lines. The project will require earthwork, culvert extension, drainage modification, vegetation removal, utility relocation, paving, sign installation, and striping. The majority of work will occur within the City’s right of way (ROW); however, temporary permits to enter and construct will be needed to install the new culvert and connect the drainage from private properties. Permanent ROW acquisition will not be required. Construction will take one season and the project is anticipated to be built in 2022.

An Initial Study ( IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It describes why the project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed project could have a significant effect on biological resources, but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The mitigation measures and conservation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre- construction surveys, in-water work windows, impact minimization, exclusionary fencing, and erosion control.

Based on the conclusions made in the IS, an MND was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project. In addition, a Mitigation and Monitoring Program ( MMP) has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.

The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners who own property in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. One comment letter was received during the public comment period. The comment was from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the response to the comment letter has been prepared and is attached to the final MND.

Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Staff Report 6-15-2021 (4.11(d)--Award BS 5667 Oregon Street Improvements) Report to Redding City Council June 9, 2021
Re: 4.11( c)-- Oregon Street Improvements Project Page 3 The City of Redding is the lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the City Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section

18.24.070.E and state law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the City Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk’ s Office and the State Clearinghouse, completing the environmental review process. The IS/MND is available in the City Clerk’ s office for review and is currently available online at https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/environmental-management.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Location Map
Mitigated Negative Declaration ( available online)
Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (available online) Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Staff Report 6-15-2021 (4.11(d)--Award BS 5667 Oregon Street Improvements)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Michael Brokloff as the City of Redding Representative to the Shasta County Commission on Aging (COA) to serve a two-year term effective January 5, 2026, through January 3, 2028, pursuant to the Shasta County COA bylaws.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation and provide alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The Shasta County Commission on Aging (COA) is the official advisory commission to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors and the Area Agency on Aging, Planning and Service Area 2 on matters related to the older adult population of Shasta County. The COA reviews and evaluates the performance of organizations who receive public funds in order to offer constructive advice to the Board of Supervisors. The COA is comprised of eight members – one from each of the five supervisorial districts, appointed by the supervisor from that district; and one each from the cities of Anderson, Redding, and Shasta Lake, appointed by the respective City Councils.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider Mayor's reappointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging.

Mike Littau, Mayor
Packet Pg. 224
Report to Redding City Council February 10, 2026
Re: 5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging Page 2 According to the attached By-Laws, members from supervisorial Districts 1 and 4 and the cities of Redding and Shasta Lake shall be appointed for 2-year terms expiring on the first Monday after January 1 of even numbered years. Members from supervisorial Districts 2, 3, and 4, and the City of Anderson shall be appointed for 2-year terms expiring on the first Monday after January 1 of odd numbered years.

Michael Brokloff was appointed on May 6, 2025, to fill an unexpired term ending January 4, 2026. He is eligible to be reappointed and has expressed interest in continuing to serve on the Shasta County COA. If approved, his term will end January 3, 2028.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Brokloff, Michael - Application
^Shasta County Commission on Aging Bylaws
Packet Pg. 225
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: ^Brokloff, Michael - Application (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging) Boards, Commissions,
and Committees
Interests & Experiences
High School, College, Professional, Vocational, or Other Schools Attended. Please include Major or Field of Study, Dates Attended, Degree and Date of Degree.

List any position or office held in governmental agency, civic, or charitable organization. (This is not a requirement for appointment.)
Please state why you want to become a member of this Board, Commission, or Committee.

Please provide any otherinformation which you feel would be useful in reviewing your application State and local law require that you abstain from participation in decisions that may affect your financial interests, including sources of income, interest in real property, personal finances or investments. In addition, if appointed, you may be required to fill out a disclosure statement which identifies certain of your financial interest beginning with the immediate twelve-month period prior to your appointment.

City of Redding City Clerks Office
777 Cypress Ave., 3rd Floor, Redding, Ca 96001
phone: 530.225.4447 | email: [email protected] AA University of the State of New York General Studies 1984 BS Brigham Young University Physical Plant Administration 1988 MBA California State Polytechnic University Business 1993 US Navy Machinist Mate First Class Active 1980-1985 Reserve 1985 - 1992 Board Member: California Association of Healthcare Leaders 3yrs Shasta County Grand Jury 2023 - 2024
Turtle Bay Voluenteer 3yrs
Therapy Dog Team 2025
I care for my 84yo mother
We're all getting older and need to have elder interests represented Process Improvement Experience
Service Organization Management Experience Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: ^Brokloff, Michael - Application (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging) Boards, Commissions,
and Committees
City of Redding City Clerks Office
777 Cypress Ave., 3rd Floor, Redding, Ca 96001
phone: 530.225.4447 | email: [email protected] Reference 1 Name:

Reference 2 Name:

Reference 1 Phone or Email:

Reference 2 Phone or Email:

References
Verification
Yes
Yes
No
No
If applicable, have you ever attended a meeting of the Board, Commission or Committee to which you are applying for?
Would you be able to attend meetings at the scheduled time? By checking the box below, you agree with the following statement.

I agree that all of the information contained in my responses to the questions on this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further agree that, by checking the box below and submitting this application, online or otherwise, I am affixing my digital signature to this form as of the date submitted.

I Agree
Thank you for your application! You will be notified if there is a vacancy/opening and you have been selected to serve. Please attach a resume, if applicable, to this application and submit via email to:

[email protected].

Garnet Booth Liz Golnick (Turtle Bay Supervisor) ■
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: ^Brokloff, Michael - Application (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging)

SHASTA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING

BY-LAWS

ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of this commission shall be the "Shasta County Commission on Aging" and shall be referred to in these By-Laws as the "Commission."

ARTICLE II

PURPOSES
The Commission shall have the following advisory powers, functions, and duties:

Section 1. Study, review, evaluate, and make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors relative to any and all matters affecting senior citizens in the County of Shasta, including, but without being limited to health; nutrition, education, employment, housing, transportation, recreation, and finance.

Section 2. Inventory the nature and extent of the unmet needs of the senior citizens in this county.

Section 3. Identify the various services made available to senior citizens in this county (by both governmental and nongovernmental agencies), and assist in the coordination of such services.

Section 4. Make such studies and submit to the Board of Supervisors such reports or recommendations respecting matters affecting senior citizens, including, but without limitation to, those listed in Section 1, as the Board may from time to time request.

Section 5. Evaluate the performance of senior organizations in the community that receive federal, state, or local funds, for the purpose of offering constructive advice.

Section 6. Act as the central clearinghouse for senior matters in Shasta County for the Board of Supervisors and make recommendations to the PSA II Area Agency on Aging Advisory Council.

Section 7. Review, evaluate, and make timely recommendations to the Board of Supervisors regarding federal, state, or local funds to be allocated to community senior organizations. An applications for funds specifically intended for such organizations shall be presented to the Commission, except those which have been previously approved by the Board. The Commission's recommendation shall be advisory only, and failure of Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: ^Shasta County Commission on Aging Bylaws (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging)

the Commission to make such recommendations in a timely manner, when reasonably requested, will be taken as an affirmative recommendation to the Board of Supervisors of such application or proposal.

ARTICLE III

MEMBERSHIP AND OFFICERS
Section 1. Number of Members
The Commission shall consist of eight members, five of whom are appointed by the Board of Supervisors, one from each supervisorial district, and one member each from the cities of Anderson, Redding, and Shasta Lake, appointed by the respective City Council.

Section 2. Eligibility of Members and Commissioner Bias a. All of the members of the Commission shall be residents of Shasta County and shall serve without compensation.
b. Subject to all laws regarding conflicts of interest, not more than one owner, operator, employee, or representative of a direct provider of services may sit on the Commission at any time.

Section 3. Terms of Office
Members from supervisorial Districts 1 and 5 and the cities of Redding and Shasta Lake shall be appointed for 2-year terms expiring on the first Monday after January 1 of even numbered years. Members from supervisorial Districts 2, 3, and 4, and the City of Anderson shall be appointed for 2-year terms expiring on the first Monday after January 1 of odd numbered years.

Section 4. Election of Officers
Officers, consisting of a Chair and a Vice-Chair, shall be elected annually at the first meeting after each January 1. They sha1l be nominated by an ad hoc nominating committee of two (2) persons appointed by the Chair. Further nominations may be made by any Commissioner.

Section 5. Commissioner Removal for Cause
Commissioners may be removed by the appointing authority for cause, including but not limited to Commissioner bias, misconduct, or other evidence of inability or failure to properly discharge his or her responsibilities as a Commissioner. If a member is absent for three (3) consecutive regular meetings, without excuse (e.g., illness, out-ofPacket Pg. 230 Attachment: ^Shasta County Commission on Aging Bylaws (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging)

town absence, etc.), he or she may be removed from the Commission, either at the request of the Commission or upon the appointing authority's own action to remove the Commissioner and appoint a replacement.

ARTICLE IV

MEETINGS
Section 1. The Commission on Aging shall meet once each month on a regular basis. A conference room shall be made available for the monthly meetings, if needed, by request for reservation made through the Clerk of the Board staff. The Commission may also meet during the year throughout Shasta County's cities, districts, and other locations within the jurisdiction of Shasta County.

Section 2. Special meetings may be called by the Chairman, or by three (3) Commissioners, with no less than 24-hours advance notice.

Section 3. A quorum shall be a majority of the seated members of the Commission. A majority vote of the seated members is required for action to be taken.

Section 4. Public notice shall be posted as required by the Brown Act.

ARTICLE V

AMENDMENTS
Amendments to these By-Laws may be recommended by the Commission to the Board of Supervisors by a majority of the seated members Commission, at any regular meeting, provided a 30-day written notice has been given to all Commissioners. There shall be no changes of the published proposal without a further 30-day period before a recommendation to the Board.

ARTICLE VI

PARLIAMENTARY AUTHORITY
Roberts Rules of Order, current edition, shall govern procedures not covered by these By-Laws of the Shasta Commission on Aging Policies and Procedures.

Date: _____________________ ______________________________ Chair
Shasta County Commission on Aging
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: ^Shasta County Commission on Aging Bylaws (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging)

 Resolution No. 77-284 – Establishing a Commission on Aging as Advisory to the Board of Supervisors (and Bylaws) (dated October 11, 1977)  Resolution No. 81-52 – Establishing a Commission on Aging as Advisory to the Board of Supervisors (and Bylaws) (dated March 17, 1981)  Bylaws revised at Board of Supervisors meeting of April 5, 1994  Bylaws revised at Board of Supervisors meeting of August 21, 2001  Bylaws revised at Board of Supervisors meeting of November 4, 2008  Bylaws revised at Board of Supervisors meeting August 26, 2014 Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: ^Shasta County Commission on Aging Bylaws (5.1--Appointment to the Shasta County Commission on Aging)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the Mayor to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc., outlining the cooperating framework to support the Ironman 70.3 branded endurance triathlon to take place in the City of Redding on August 16, 2026, August 15, 2027, and August 13, 2028; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $53,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to support the Ironman 70.3 event.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of the City of Redding (City) entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc. (Choose Redding) is $53,000 a year for Fiscal Years (FY) 2027, 2028, and 2029. Further breakdown of cost expenses is broken down below.

FY 27 FY 28 FY 29
Police $17,000 $17,000 $17,000
Fire $6,000 $6,000 $6,000
Shuttle Services $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Miscellaneous $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Total $53,000 $53,000 $53,000
The costs for Redding Police and Redding Fire represent additional staffing for the event. The shuttle service will transport race participants from the Civic Center to Whiskeytown Lake for the first leg of the race. This will be a direct payment to the Redding Area Bus Authority.

Miscellaneous costs include sending notifications to impacted City residents and possibly an economic impact study.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.1(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(a)--Consider Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marking Group, Inc.

Jason Gibilisco, Management
Assistant to the City Manager
Packet Pg. 233
Report to Redding City Council February 12, 2026
Re: 9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group Page 2 The City anticipates increases in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and sales tax. Choose Redding estimates that the City will experience an increase of TOT in the amount $152,000 or more for race week. The total TOT return for the week of the Ironman 70.3 race is expected to be in the range of $345,000.

While the sales tax may increase, it will be a very slight increase. The event operator, World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) operates an Ironman 70.3 sales tent solely for race gear and merchandise, and it is common to sell $1,000,000 worth of merchandise during race weekend.

Estimated sales tax revenue solely from the Ironman 70.3 sales tent is estimated to be $10,000.

Although the event is expected to generate revenues that will benefit the General Fund, the budget resolution proposes the use of General Fund reserves as the funding source. This reflects a conservative budgeting approach, planning for reserve usage while recognizing that revenues may ultimately increase.

As previously discussed by Council, current reserve levels are forecasted to finish below the thresholds established in Council Policy 412.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the MOU and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
On January 20, 2026, the MOU together with a Budget Resolution was presented to the Council for action. The costs proposed at the meeting were all general fund expenses and the direction was to bring back the item on February 17, 2026 for consideration.

Following the meeting, staff worked with both Public Works and Community Services to locate availability of other funding sources for road and trail maintenance. Public Works informed staff that the bicycle portion of the race has not been finalized. Public Works staff recommends waiting for Ironman 70.3 to determine the bike course and reevaluating at that time to determine the costs needed for potential road maintenance. Public Works will return to Council if necessary.

In order for Community Services Department to take on the trail maintenance required by Ironman in their current budget, other planned and budgeted services will not be funded. These items include rehabilitating portions of Hilltop Drive median and Carnegie Park, replacement of park signage to improve enforceability, replacement and addition of bollards and fencing for security, and improvements/repairs to public restrooms, including those in the vicinity of the event.

As previously mentioned the MOU divides the services required from the WTC to successfully run the Ironman 70.3 event. The City will be taking on roles such as expediting City approvals and permits; command post coordination; sending notifications to impacted City residents; coordination of shuttle services; and waste management services.

Packet Pg. 234
Report to Redding City Council February 12, 2026
Re: 9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group Page 3 Choose Redding will be operating as the host and agreed to take on a number of roles per the MOU. Some of those roles include providing complimentary hotel rooms; ambulance and medical services; concessions; infrastructure equipment for electricity, lighting, and internet; lavatories; volunteers; and a number of other roles.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Budget Resolution
Memorandum of Understanding
October 7, 2025 Staff Report
January 20, 2026 Staff Report
Packet Pg. 235
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 23rd AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-049 INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS BY $53,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FOR IRONMAN 70.3

EVENT SUPPORT

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended 2027

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101 1099 Non-Departmental $53,000 $0
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended 2027

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Beginning Balance
101-0000-2910000 Fund Balance $ 53,000
Increase Expenditures
101-1099-5358010 Ironman $ 53,000
Total $ 53,000 $ 53,000
THAT the purpose is to increase appropriations by $53,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27 for Ironman 70.3 event support.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of February, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Host Venue Agreement (Agreement) with World Triathlon Corporation to hold an event in the City of Redding in August 2026, August 2027, and August 2028;
(2) Accept the Letter of Commitment of Financial Support for the duration of the Agreement from Choose Redding;
(3) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Partnership Agreement with Choose Redding and upon City Attorney approval, execute the Partnership Agreement; and (4) Conditioned upon City Attorney approval, authorize the Mayor to execute the Host Venue Agreement.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of the City of Redding (City) entering into a Host Venue Agreement (Agreement) with World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) for a three-year term is unknown.

However, pursuant to the agreement, the host city is tasked to provide a number of support services specifically identified in the Agreement’s Exhibit C. We plan to coordinate efforts to complete this additional work with Choose Redding through a Partnership Agreement and other local agencies.

As a number of City departments will be involved with the event, the City’s associated cost to host requires further detailed analysis by staff. A complete event analysis and the projected fiscal impact will be included with the mid-year budget amendments. It should be noted, based on similar events held in other communities, it is projected that the sales tax and transient oriented taxes generated from the event will exceed City staff costs associated with event operations.

MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.2(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(c)--Consider agreement with World Triathlon Corporation to host triathlon events
Steve Bade, Interim City
Manager
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Report to Redding City Council October 2, 2025
Re: 9.2(c)--Host Venue Agreement with World Triathlon Corporation Page 2 Choose Redding has committed financial support for the three-year term at a minimum of $200,000 annually (see Commitment Letter attached).

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the agreement and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
In September 2025, Choose Redding Lodging hosted a tour for representatives from World Triathlon Corporation to gauge if the area surrounding the City would be a good location to host an IRONMAN 70.3 branded endurance triathlon (Race). On September 18, 2025, Choose Redding contacted the City to announce that WTC chose the Redding area for a three-year term with the first event scheduled for August 2026 with subsequent events in August 2027 and August 2028.

A draft agreement is currently being reviewed by staff that sets forth the expectations for both parties – WTC and the City, which is identified as the host/lead entity. As stated above, the host is tasked with a number of obligations that include support services; personnel; security; facilities; event coordination; permitting assistance; communications; parking; and in-kind services. Pursuant to the agreement, there are a number of tasks that are out of the City’s services, such as complimentary hotel rooms; ambulance and medical services; concessions; infrastructure equipment for electricity and lighting; lavatories; shuttles; and volunteers. To address these other services, staff is proposing to negotiate a third-party partnership agreement with Choose Redding.

Beyond the City’s and Choose Redding’s commitments, staff has connected with Shasta County, the California Department of Transportation, National Park Service, Redding Chamber of Commerce and Visit Redding to introduce the event and gather initial support. To date, all groups are generally supportive; willing to assist; and starting to analyze the impacts and feasibility of the event.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Choose Redding -Letter of Commitment to Financial Support for WTC DRAFT Host Venue Agreement WTC 2026-2028
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group)

HOST VENUE AGREEMENT
IRONMAN® 70.3® NORTHERN CALIFORNIA (2026-2028)
Confidential Agreement
This Host Venue Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of ________________, 2025 (the “Effective Date”) by and between WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION, a Florida corporation (“WTC”) and the host party indicated below (“Host”). WTC and Host are sometimes referred to herein individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” HOST:

CITY OF REDDING
Address: 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
Attn: Steve Bade, Assistant City Manager
Email: [email protected]
Legal Notices Email:[email protected]
Location(s): REDDING, CALIFORNIA (the “Venue”)
Race(s)/Event:

In each Race Year (defined below), WTC shall be responsible for operating, in and around the Venue, an IRONMAN® 70.3®-branded endurance triathlon (comprising, subject to cancellation of any part thereof due to weather conditions or other reasons, a 1.2-mile swim, 56-mile bicycle ride, and 13.1-mile run) (the “Race”) and performing certain administrative, operational, and sales and marketing functions related thereto (collectively, and together with the Race and any additional races added under Item B-1(d), an “Event”).

Official Name of
Event:

The official name of the Event will be IRONMAN® 70.3® NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. WTC may elect to add the name of a “title” sponsor and/or “presenting” sponsor to the official name of the Event (e.g., “[Title Sponsor] IRONMAN® 70.3® NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, presented by [Presenting Sponsor]”).

Race Date(s)
The Race each year of the Term will occur on the following applicable dates (each, a “Race Date”):
• 2026 Race Date: August 16, 2026
• 2027 Race Date: August 15, 2027
• 2028 Race Date: August 13, 2028
Term of
Agreement:

This Agreement is effective beginning on the Effective Date, and will continue in effect until the date that is thirty (30) days after the 2028 Event, unless this Agreement is sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (the “Term”).

Annual Payment: With respect to each Event, Host shall, under the terms of Exhibit A, pay WTC the amounts stated in Exhibit A (each, an “Annual Payment”).

Host Support
Services:

Host shall timely provide to WTC (or, as the case may be, shall timely provide for WTC’s benefit), the services, equipment, value in-kind, personnel, and other items set forth in Exhibit C (collectively, the “Host Support Services”) for each Event.

Sponsorship &
Expo Vendor
Referrals:

Host shall not grant or sell sponsorships, official designations, Expo space, or any other rights at or in connection with the Event to any third parties.

Sponsorship
Benefits:

WTC shall provide Host with a sponsorship benefits package (for use solely by Host) to include Expo booth space, signage (advertising only the Host) at certain locations along the Race course, placement of Host’s logo on all public Event-related printed material produced by WTC, and placement of Host’s logo and Host’s banner advertisements on the Event Website.

Hospitality
Package; Race
Entries:

Should the Event include VIP/Hospitality packages, WTC shall provide Host with a hospitality package (for use solely by Host) to include twenty-five (25) complimentary sponsor hospitality passes for the Event for use by Host’s employees and representatives, which passes grant access to certain selective benefits at the Event (not all Events may offer a full suite of hospitality benefits).

Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 2 of 21
Confidential Agreement
Additionally, WTC shall provide Host with ten (10) complimentary race entries (i.e., to participate as an age-group athlete) for the Event for use by Host subject to the terms of this Agreement. Each race entry is only for the specific race and specific year, and cannot be used for, or deferred for, entry in any other race or the designated race in a later year.

WTC reserves the right to deny the use by any specific individual(s) of any race entries or hospitality passes.

Additional Terms: The following exhibits, attached hereto, contain additional terms of this Agreement: Exhibit D (regarding intellectual property rights); and Exhibit E (general terms).

The Parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

WTC:

WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION
HOST:

CITY OF REDDING
By: ______________________________
Name: SHANE FACTEAU
Title: COO
By: _______________________________
Name: JACK MUNNS
Title: MAYOR
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 3 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT A
Annual Payments;
Wire Transfer Instructions
Regarding the Event
for Race Year
Annual Payment to be paid
by Host to WTC
Annual Payment
Due Date
2026 $200,000.00 January 1, 2026
2027 $210,000.00 January 1, 2027
2028 $220,500.00 January 1, 2028
Time is of the essence with respect to each such payment. All payments to WTC that are required or contemplated under this Agreement must be made in immediately available U.S. dollars via the following wire transfer instructions:

Bank Name: Bank of America, NY NY
Routing Number: 026009593
Account Name: World Triathlon Corporation
Account Number: 898052297785
SWIFT Code: BOFAUS3N
[HOST TO INSERT] Host’s billing contact information:
• Contact Name: ____________________________
• Email address: _____________________________
• Telephone number: _________________________
WTC will not change payment instructions and/or banking details by e-mail communication. If Host receives an e-mail from WTC requesting that Host wire or otherwise transfer funds, Host must confirm the request and any corresponding instruction(s) by telephone with WTC before Host initiates any transfer. Please confirm the request by calling WTC’s Accounts Receivable Department at (813) 327- 5613. WTC will not be responsible for any funds wired to an incorrect account. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 4 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT B
Event Specifics
B-1. General.
a. Authorization; Ownership. Host authorizes WTC to prepare and conduct an Event in and around the Venue during each year of the Term (each, a “Race Year”). WTC is and will be the owner of each Event and nothing herein constitutes a license by WTC to Host or to any third party to establish or operate any Event or Race.
b. Name. When referring to any Event, Host shall (and shall use reasonable efforts to cause relevant third parties to) at all times use such official name of the Event (including mention of the official title sponsor, if any, and the official presenting sponsor, if any). c. Event Changes. WTC may in its reasonable discretion, in order to improve any Event, institute changes in the implementation or structure of such Event; provided, however, that no material change may be made to any previously confirmed location or venue(s) without the prior written consent of both Parties.
d. Additional Races. WTC shall have the option to conduct, as part of any or all Events, a WTCowned 5K Fun Run and/or a 5150TM, IRONKIDS® and/or IRON GIRL® triathlon, duathlon, or run contemporaneously (e.g., during the same weekend) with the Race. WTC may create additional, race-specific logos for any such additional races conducted, and such logos will be subject to the same restrictions applicable to the Event Logo (as defined in Exhibit D) under this Agreement. e. World Championship Entries. With respect to certain eligible top finishers of the Race, WTC will award non-transferable qualifying slots for entry in the applicable IRONMAN 70.3 World Championship (“Championship Slots”). The number of Championship Slots applicable to each Race will be determined by WTC in its sole discretion, and may change each year.

B-2. Certain Obligations of Host.
a. Host Support Services. Unless otherwise expressly agreed to in this Agreement, Host shall provide the Host Support Services at Host’s own cost. Host Support Services may be modified from time to time by WTC in its reasonable discretion, provided that no such change (i) results in any material additional cost or expense to Host or (ii) requires Host to do anything Host is not authorized, or does not have legal jurisdiction, to do or cause to be done. b. Compliance with Law. In connection with each Event and Host’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, Host shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. c. Operational Aspects. In order to facilitate proper and timely planning, implementing, and conducting of each Event by WTC, Host shall, and shall cause each of its representatives, agents, and contractors to, follow instructions, solely regarding Event-related operational or technical issues, from WTC or any third party designated by WTC.
d. Intellectual Property of WTC. Except with respect to the Event Logo (the use of which by Host being subject to Exhibit D), Host shall not, without WTC’s prior written consent, use any intellectual property rights of WTC, including without limitation the Ironman®, 70.3®, Iron Girl®, IRONKIDS®, Velothon®, Cape Epic®, 5150®, and Rock ‘n’ Roll® marks and names, the “M-Dot” logo, and the “K-Dot” logo. Host shall promptly inform WTC of any possible misuse or infringement by any person or entity of the Event Logo or any other intellectual property of WTC.

Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 5 of 21
Confidential Agreement
e. Information Updates. Host shall, upon request from WTC, promptly inform WTC as to the status of the performance of Host’s obligations hereunder, including without limitation regarding the Host Support Services.
f. Representations. Host covenants that each of the representations and warranties made by Host in Item E-2 will be true and complete at all times during the Term. g. Unauthorized Drones. During the Event, Host shall make commercially reasonable efforts to prohibit the use of drones in and around the Race course by third parties that have not been approved by WTC.

B-3. Certain Obligations of WTC. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, and with respect to each Event:
a. Operations, Equipment, and Personnel. Except to the extent required to be provided or obtained by Host as part of the Host Support Services, or as may be otherwise required under this Agreement, WTC shall provide for (or cause to be provided) all Race-related equipment, supplies, personnel (including volunteers and a local Race Director), training of personnel (including volunteers), Race manuals/programs, Race course route determination and design, Race course set-up and tear-down, online and on-site athlete registration and check-in, welcome functions, award ceremonies, procurement of facilities, facility decoration, and all other technical and operational aspects of the Race. WTC may require that each Event use Race timing, registration, photography, or other services provided by WTC or any of its affiliates, designees, or service providers.
b. Expo. WTC shall provide for a multi-day vendor exposition at each Event (the “Expo”), which Expo may be referred to as the “IRONMAN Village” or other name chosen by WTC. At the Expo, WTC (or its designee) may sell official IRONMAN®-branded (or any other) merchandise and services, and, to the extent approved in writing by WTC, Event sponsors and other Expo vendors may sell or otherwise distribute other merchandise and services. Except as may otherwise be required by applicable law, Host shall not charge or assess any fee, tax, surcharge, or other cost to or on any vendor, contractor, or any other party in connection with the Expo, or any athlete entry fees, sponsorships, or any other aspect of the Event. c. Website; Media; Broadcasts. WTC shall provide and maintain the official website that markets the Event (the “Event Website”), including a live global streaming webcast of the Race. WTC shall retain the rights to all imagery and audiovisual works in connection with each Event, including but not limited to, television broadcast or cablecast (live or tape-delay), radio broadcast, Internet broadcast (audio or video), videotaping, filming, and photography, all of which, as between WTC and Host, is the sole property of WTC and will not be reproduced, remarketed, or otherwise distributed or publicly displayed by Host without the written permission of WTC. WTC may, in its sole discretion, grant or license any or all of these rights to third parties or to Host.

B-4. Official Announcements; Promotions by Host.
a. Host Website. Host, on its website, shall prominently advertise the Event and the fact that Host is hosting the Event, and at all times during the Term shall prominently display a link, on its website, to the Event Website.
b. Announcements. Host shall not make any public announcements of a marketing or promotional nature (whether in writing, orally, via the Internet, or otherwise) of any Event without the prior written consent of WTC in each instance (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld), except that no such consent will be required to the extent such announcements are required of Host as part of the Host Support Services (or otherwise required of Host under the terms of this Agreement), or that:
i. are entirely administrative in nature, such as announcements informing the public Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 6 of 21
Confidential Agreement
regarding operational logistics or public safety matters (e.g., road closures, Event dates, Venue access);
ii. include only information in the public domain; and
iii. are not for purposes of marketing or promotion.
c. Other Matters. Host shall not use the Event, any marketing opportunity related thereto or arising out of the Event, or the like, for any purpose other than to promote the Venue in a positive and universally appealing manner. To the extent Host is not prohibited by law from doing so, Host shall not permit any political statements, political campaign propaganda, or the like to be made (or made available) at the Event, or otherwise to be associated (or purported to be associated), whether directly or indirectly, with the Event or the marketing thereof. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 7 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT C
Host Support Services
With respect to each Event, and at no cost to WTC, Host shall, as the case may be, do, obtain, or provide (or cause to be done, obtained, or provided) the following:

C-1. Approvals & Permits. Host shall ensure that, at no cost to WTC, WTC timely receives all governmental, regulatory, and third-party approvals, permits, access rights, business licenses, consents, ordinance exemptions, commitments, and licenses necessary or useful in connection with performance by Host or WTC of this Agreement, including without limitation the conducting of the Event, the Race, and the Expo, closures of roadways, use of amplified sound and music by WTC in connection with the Event, and Host’s provision of the Host Support Services (collectively, the “Approvals & Permits”). Host shall ensure that, 180 days prior to the Event, all Approvals & Permits with respect to the Event are obtained, and that all Approvals & Permits will remain in effect for and during the Event; in each case at no cost to WTC (e.g., no charges for site fees, access fees, rental fees, closure fees, licensee fees, application fees, environmental impact fees, permit fees, etc.).

C-2. Ambulance Services. Host shall secure value-in-kind providers for EMS transport services for each Event. Host shall ensure that ambulances will be distributed strategically at the Venue, transition area, celebration areas, along the Race route, and the Event medical area. Host shall ensure that dedicated EMS units will be on hand to respond to emergency transport needs and the general public on the day of the Event.

C-3. Coordination of Welcome Experience with Host Hotels. With respect to all official Event/Host hotels Host shall:
a. Coordinate all official Event/Host hotel partners & housing services for the Events b. Conduct pre-Event training with hotel staff to understand demographic of guests c. Coordinate welcome signage onsite
d. Coordinate Event-branded key cards with all hotel partners e. Be responsible for Event information inventory at each official Event/Host hotel f. Coordinate all accommodation partners & housing service for the Event C-4. Coordination of Auxiliary Work Space. Host will provide good and efficient locations for auxiliary work space. Host shall supply the necessary workspace for the following Event needs and functions:
a. VIP function space
b. Victory celebration area (Finish Area)
c. Press conference – media and business center
d. Meeting rooms
e. Executive board rooms
f. Paved area for operations, logistics, shipping, and receiving g. Secured warehouse and storage space
C-5. Concessions. If WTC requests, Host shall make arrangements to provide food and beverage concessions for the Event, in which case Host shall retain all revenue from such requested food and beverage concessions.

C-6. Command Post Coordination. Host, at no cost to WTC, shall ensure a special command post will be temporarily installed on the site or at a satellite location, bringing together all three emergency services (police, fire, and ambulance), private security, volunteer security personnel, and communications.

C-7. Complimentary Hotel Rooms. Host shall provide (or cause to be provided) to WTC 30 complimentary Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 8 of 21
Confidential Agreement
hotel room nights prior to each Event week and 150 complimentary hotel room nights during Event week at the official Event/Host hotel(s). All such hotels must be within a mutually agreed upon distance and proximity to Event venues. Host shall also assist WTC with the coordination of local hotels and other entities to facilitate arrangements for local accommodations, travel, and tourist activities.

C-8. Economic Impact Studies. To the extent the Parties agree that an economic impact study of the Event is necessary, Host shall be responsible for covering the cost of an economic impact study. As necessary to facilitate each study, WTC shall provide certain aggregate demographic and registration information (i.e., no personal data or contact information). WTC and Host will mutually agree upon the scope of each study and will work together to arrange for such study to be conducted. The report following such study shall be provided to WTC within sixty (60) days of each Event.

C-9. Electrical Services & Equipment. Host shall provide a special event electricity system (which shall meet the specific demands of each Event) and ultra-quiet generators for satellites and special Event sites including, but not limited to, all medical emergency areas and the finish line. Host shall cause power hookups to be provided by certified technicians under the applicable construction codes and regulations.

C-10. Event Lighting. To the extent lighting is already present at the Venue and available for use by Host, Host shall supply lighting for the Venue areas such as the transition area, swim, bike, and run courses, medical, and the finish area. To the extent such lighting is not already present at such sites or is not available for use by Host, any additional lighting required shall be supplied at the cost of Host.

C-11. Host Management Team. With respect to each Event, Host shall provide (and provide fair compensation to) a professional management team who will be responsible for: (a) working with WTC to organize and finalize the details of each Event, and (b) ensuring a high level quality Event for WTC’s operations and staff and to Event participants and their families, friends, and spectators.

C-12. Internet Service. Host shall provide high speed internet service to all WTC workspaces (including, without limitation, all VIP areas, media areas, Expo areas, merchandising tents, athlete village areas, the transition area, and the beach/ swim areas) and, upon WTC’s request, Host shall provide high speed internet for WTC’s television productions of the Event (the specifications of such internet shall be in accordance with the industry standards for televised world-class sporting events).

C-13. Lavatories. Host shall supply the necessary lavatories for the Event needs and functions.

C-14. Law Enforcement Services. Host shall be responsible for all costs associated with providing law enforcement personnel and services required for public safety and enforcement of traffic control plans throughout the Event. Host shall coordinate with local and regional police services (including without limitation, the Shasta County Sheriff’s Department, California State Troopers, Redding Park Rangers, and Redding City Police)to ensure adequate staffing and effective coverage of all Event areas, including roads, venues, and crowd zones.

C-15. Lead Agency. Host shall serve as the “lead agency” to support the operational activities of the Event, including but not limited to facility and venue acquisition, permitting, police and emergency services acquisition, parking acquisition, communications acquisition, local accommodations, travel, volunteer recruitment, media, public awareness, and advocacy.

C-16. Media Coverage. Host shall promote the Event in Host’s owned media including coverage using its website, printed materials, frequent social media posts, and emails to its subscribers.

C-17. Medical Professionals. WTC shall provide its official medical plan to Host and shall provide a reasonable opportunity for Host to review and comment on the official medical plan prior to execution of this Agreement. Host shall provide a team of medical professionals, including a Medical Director, who will coordinate and implement WTC’s official medical plan. Host acknowledges that an Event medical team of no less than 30 licensed medical professionals will be required for the Event.

Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 9 of 21
Confidential Agreement
C-18. No Construction. Host shall use its best efforts to ensure that no structural, engineering, beautification, or other works occur that could in any way interfere with the Race or any other aspect of the Event.

C-19. Operations Support Staff. Host shall arrange and/or subcontract for sufficient manpower to adequately assist WTC with operations for the Event (e.g., including but not limited to, the set up/take down of all Event venues, Race courses, finish line and celebration areas, banquet facilities, Expo space, and ancillary functions) (the “Operations Support Staff”). The Operations Support Staff shall report directly to WTC’s Race Director. Host shall cover all costs associated with locating and hiring the Operations Support Staff, including without limitation, all payments and benefits.

C-20. Parking. Host shall provide (or cause to be provided) satellite parking lots (with parking lot attendants) outside of the operations perimeter.

C-21. Participant and Spectator – Facing Venues. Host shall provide venues for the Event which shall consist of a large, centralized area for the transition area(s), swim bike and run routes, finish line, athlete recovery area, concessions, parking, VIP hospitality, merchandise sales, and spectator viewing. Host shall also provide adequate space to accommodate athlete check-in, consumer expo, merchandise sales, secured warehouse/storage space and parking. Host acknowledges that certain facilities will be required from the Tuesday before each Race until the Monday immediately following each Race.

C-22. Partnership Meeting Space. Host shall provide complimentary convention area space (or such other adequate meeting space) during Event week as required by WTC for WTC’s partnership meetings.

C-23. Public Grants and Support. Host shall use best efforts to raise public grants and support for the Event.

Host shall be entitled to keep any and all sponsorship fees, grants, financial support, or subventions of any nature whatsoever from or paid to Host by the federal government, any state government, any municipal government, government board, government institution, or government firm relative to the Event.

C-24. Race Course Exclusivity and Condition.Host shall ensure that all roads, waterways, and all other public spaces to be used for the Race are closed to the public (to the extent such closure(s) are possible, but at a minimum, Host shall restrict access to all roads, waterways, and other public spaces to the best of its ability) during the Race (and for a reasonable period before and after the Race) and are made exclusively available to WTC during such periods. Host shall ensure that all Race routes within Venue limits are in good condition during the Event.

C-25. Resident Notifications. Host shall create and disburse resident notifications (to be pre-approved by WTC). Such notifications shall be sent to residents and businesses in areas impacted by the Event and the Race route and shall communicate any/all applicable road closures, traffic advisories, and impacts during the Event week and on the Race Date.

C-26. Security Services. Host shall provide security services and a sufficient number of security guards for all Event areas from the time that Event operations start until Event operations are complete.

C-27. Shuttle Services. Host shall provide (or cause to be provided) dedicated Race day shuttle buses to transport athletes and spectators in and around the Venue.

C-28. Street Cleaning. Host shall be responsible for sweeping and cleaning up all streets and other areas prior to and after each Event.

C-29. Swim Course Ingress/Egress. Host shall ensure safe and adequate ingress and egress for the swim portion of the Race. This includes access points that accommodate athlete entry and exit, crowd control, and emergency response accessibility.

C-30. Swim Site Access Fees and Permitting. Host shall pay and/or waive all access fees in connection with the swim portion of the Event including, without limitation, all site fees, visitor fees, park rentals, and all other fees related to user or access to the swim area facilities and amenities within the Venue.

Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 10 of 21
Confidential Agreement
C-31. Terrorism and Counterterrorism Measures. To the extent such measures are required by law or to the extent such measures are deemed necessary by local law enforcement (e.g., for the safety of the Event participants and spectators), Host shall be responsible for any and all costs for counterterrorism measures required in connection with the Event, including, without limitation, anti-terrorism personnel, equipment (e.g., suppression vehicles, jersey barriers, surveillance, etc.), and services.

C-32. Traffic Control Services and Devices. Host shall provide all traffic control services and devices for each Event (including, without limitation, all personnel, devices, engineering diagrams, variable message boards, barricades, cones for traffic control, special event traffic signage, parking signs, temporary traffic light systems, traffic control vehicles equipped with yellow arrows, and plans to assure maximum road safety in partnership with local and regional police services).

C-33. Volunteer Director. Host shall designate an individual to serve as the volunteer director for each Event (the “Volunteer Director”), who will be responsible for managing volunteer operations, including recruitment, scheduling, and on-site coordination.

C-34. Volunteer Recruitment. Host shall be responsible for assisting WTC with the recruitment of approximately 1,000 experienced Event volunteers to support the Event. Volunteers shall participate in a range of roles throughout the duration of the Event, including but not limited to course operations, athlete services, venue setup, and general support functions.

C-35. Waste Management Service. Host shall maintain and ensure a clean environment at all times on its properties. Adjustments will be put in place by Host in accordance with the special needs of each Event.

Recycle containers, garbage units, large units for disposal, transportation, and manpower will be provided by Host. Host shall cause all trash bagged at participant aid stations within Venue limits to be removed by Host’s waste management service.

C-36. Water (Drinking) Supply. Host shall provide sufficient access to drinking water for the Event (as determined by WTC at WTC’s sole and absolute discretion).

C-37. Water Safety Personnel and Equipment. Host shall be responsible for any and all costs to provide all water safety personnel and equipment necessary for the safe operation of the swim course. This includes, without limitation, lifeguards, paddleboards, kayaks, personal watercraft (PWCs), motorized boats, and any required tents or staging areas. Host shall bear all costs associated with water safety staffing and assets.

C-38. Welcome Banquet Services. Host, in consultation with WTC, shall provide (or cause to be provided) all Welcome Banquet services for the Event’s Welcome Banquet (e.g., including, but not limited to, venues, entertainment, viewing areas and seating, equipment, food, drinks, etc.). Host shall use best efforts to ensure that all Event guests have a memorable Welcome Banquet experience (and that such experience shall be commensurate with the Welcome Banquet experience provided at other similar IRONMAN®- branded events.

C-39. Year-Round Warehouse Space. Host shall provide approximately 10ft x 20ft of warehouse space yearround as necessary to house Event equipment. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 11 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT D
Intellectual Property Rights
D-1. Grant of Limited Rights. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, WTC hereby grants to Host the limited, non-assignable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive license to use, during the Term, the Event Logo (as defined in Exhibit D-1) in all reasonable forms of advertising and marketing, but only to the extent related to promotion of the Events, and subject in each instance to WTC’s prior written approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld. All uses of the Event Logo by Host must comply with the Trademark Standards & Usage Guidelines set forth in Exhibit D-1.

D-2. No Use on Products. Host shall not use, and shall not authorize, license, or permit any third party to use, the Event Logo on or in connection with any products, merchandise, souvenirs, or other goods or services, in each instance unless pre-approved by WTC in writing.

D-3. Ownership; Goodwill. Host acknowledges that WTC is the owner of the Event Logo and Host shall not register, or apply to register, the Event Logo, any service mark, trademark, or domain name that is similar in any manner to, or that incorporates, the Event Logo, any of WTC’s other trademarks or other intellectual property, or any mark with the word “IRON,” or any equivalent term or phrase in any language. All goodwill and rights accruing or arising under the Event Logo, or in any copyrights or other intellectual property of WTC used in connection with this Agreement or any Event, enures solely to the benefit of WTC. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 12 of 21
Confidential Agreement
EXHIBIT D-1
Trademark Standards & Usage Guidelines: Event – Specific Logo Sample Event Logo
Each Event will feature one or more IRONMAN 70.3®-branded logos customized by WTC for such Event (each, an “Event Logo”). WTC will design, create, and provide each Event Logo. The following is an example of an event logo from a different event:

WTC may elect to, from time to time, modify the Event Logo by adding the name of a “title” sponsor or “presenting” sponsor to such logo.

General
The Event Logo must be used consistently and not altered. Modifications, variations, and incorrect uses of any Event Logo dilute the IRONMAN® brand and create consumer confusion, and are therefore not permitted. You play a vital role in protecting the integrity of WTC’s intellectual property, such as the Event Logo. Please familiarize yourself with the following TRADEMARK STANDARDS &USAGE GUIDELINES, which you are required to follow when using any Event Logo in connection with any Event.

Pre-Approval Requirement
Without exception, all proposed uses of the Event Logo must be submitted to WTC for review PRIOR TO USAGE. All approval requests for use of any Event Logo must be submitted, along with a high resolution PDF image of the proposed use, to [email protected] for review by WTC. Please allow at least ten (10) business days for all approval requests to be answered. Any proposed use or item submitted that is not approved by WTC in writing within fifteen (15) days shall be deemed disapproved.

Trademark Ownership & Required Notice
Each Event Logo is, and shall remain, the property of WTC. Any and all rights to, in, and under the Event Logo, or any copyright or other intellectual property of WTC, shall enure solely to the benefit of WTC.

Notice must be given to the public that World Triathlon Corporation claims ownership of the Event Logo.

Therefore, the following legal notice must clearly appear, in no smaller than 6-point size typeface, on all of your printed materials, products, websites, and all other items on which any Event Logo is used:

IRONMAN® and 70.3® are registered trademarks of World Triathlon Corporation.

Used herein by permission.

Other Requirements
Each use by Host of the Event Logo must:
• Be solely and directly related to performing Host’s obligations, or exercising its rights, under this Agreement;
• Not be on any merchandise or services for sale or distribution (except to the extent expressly and specifically authorized by this Agreement or separate written agreement with WTC); • Not constitute or involve transfer or assignment of the License or sub-license of any Event Logo; and • Not have anything embedded in, added to, or superimposed on the Event Logo, or have any colors or color scheme different than that approved by WTC.

General
Do not use “iron” (or any foreign translation thereof) as a prefix for, or component of, any words – whether displayed as one word (e.g., “ironwoman”, “ironfamily”, or “ironmate”), as two separate words (e.g., “iron woman”, “iron family”, or “iron mate”), or as a hyphenated word (e.g., “iron-woman”, “iron-family”, or “iron-mate”). (Exceptions include IRONMAN®, IRONKIDS®, and IRON GIRL®, all of which are trademarks owned by WTC.) Please adhere to the following regarding use of the terms “IRONMAN®” and “IRONMAN® 70.3®”:
• IRONMAN® must be a single word, never hyphenated, and never capitalized as “IronMan”. • IRONMAN® and 70.3® must be two (2) separate words separated by no more and no less than one (1) Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 13 of 21
Confidential Agreement
character space.
• IRONMAN® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “IRONMAN” must never be used as a standalone term or to denote distance. (e.g., never as “Ironman distance” or “Iron distance”).
• IRONMAN® 70.3® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “IRONMAN” must never be used as a standalone term or to denote distance. (e.g., never as “half ironman”, “half ironman distance”, or “half iron distance”). • 70.3® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “70.3” must never be used as a standalone term to denote distance. (e.g., never as “70.3 miles”) • IRONMAN® should never be abbreviated as “IM.”
• IRONMAN® 70.3® should never be abbreviated as “IM70.3.” • Stand-alone references to “an IRONMAN” or “a 70.3” are improper. Please add “triathlon” to such phrases (e.g., “an IRONMAN® 70.3® triathlon”).

Please adhere to the following regarding use of the terms “IRONKIDS®”:
• IRONKIDS® must be a single word, never hyphenated, and “IronKids” is always capital letter “I” and capital letter “K” when used in title case.
• IRONKIDS® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “IRONKIDS” must never be used as a standalone term or to denote distance. (e.g., never as “IronKids distance”).
• IRONKIDS® should never be abbreviated as “IK.”
• Stand-alone references to “an IRONKIDS” are improper. Please add “dip ‘n’ dash” or “fun run” or other applicable word to such phrase (e.g., “an IRONKIDS® fun run”). * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 14 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT E
General Terms
E-1. Financial Matters.
a. Annual Payments. With respect to each Event, Host shall pay to WTC the Annual Payment under the terms of Exhibit A.
b. Sponsorship & Expo Vendor Referrals. Host shall comply with the Sponsorship & Expo Vendor Referrals terms outlined in the table on Page 1.
c. Taxes. The Annual Payment(s) set forth in Exhibit A are exclusive of taxes or fees, which are the responsibility of Host. All taxes and fees (including without limitations any foreign taxes and fees (e.g., sales tax, HST, VAT)) shall be borne by Host and shall be applied in accordance with the then applicable tax laws for each respective state, province, country, or otherwise. d. Entry Fees; Other Revenues. Except as may be otherwise expressly specified in this Agreement, WTC shall be entitled to receive and retain all Event/Race entry fees, and all other revenues and value in-kind in connection with the Events, including without limitation all revenues from merchandise sales, sponsorships, hospitality passes, VIP passes, exposition booth sales, product licenses, television licenses, and photograph sales.
e. Costs. To the extent Host does not timely provide any portion of the Host Support Services (as defined below), then, upon written request from WTC, Host shall, within thirty (30) days after delivery of such notice to Host, reimburse WTC to the extent WTC incurs, or will incur, any costs to obtain or provide any such Host Support Services not provided by Host. Such right of reimbursement does not limit WTC’s remedies with respect to Host failing to provide any of the Host Support Services.
f. Costs of Additional Security Measures. Should local and/or governmental authorities determine that enhanced security measures are necessary and must be implemented surrounding the Event, and should such measures have additional costs associated with them, the Parties will work together to discuss a reasonable and appropriate allocation of expenses to cover such costs.

E-2.Representations and Warranties. Each Party represents and warrants that:
a. It has the full right and legal authority to enter into and fully perform this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein; b. This Agreement is a legal, valid, and binding obligation of such entity, enforceable against such entity in accordance with its terms; and
c. Neither the execution, delivery, nor performance of this Agreement by it violates or will violate or cause a breach of any other agreements or obligations to which it is a party or to which it is bound, and no approval, consent, notice, or other action by or to any third party or any commission, board, or other governmental authority or agency (collectively, “Authorities”) is required in connection with the execution, delivery, or performance of this Agreement (except, with respect to WTC, certain permits, approvals, consents, notices, and other actions by Authorities may be required in connection with performance by WTC of this Agreement).

E-3.Business Partner Code of Conduct. In performing its obligations under this Agreement, Host covenants to comply with WTC’s Business Partner Code of Conduct (“Partner Code”), as amended by WTC from time to time, available at https://legal.ironman.com/Partner-Code. Host acknowledges WTC’s right to monitor compliance with the standards and requirements set forth in the Partner Code, and agrees to provide written responses to queries and, to the extent necessary, to grant reasonable access to relevant documentation to Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 15 of 21
Confidential Agreement
the extent required to monitor compliance with the Partner Code. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the Partner Code, the terms of the Agreement shall prevail.

E-4.Ambush Marketing.
a. “Ambush Marketing” means selling (e.g., including, but not limited to, sponsorship, merchandise, vendor space), advertising, or marketing, by any third party that is not a WTCauthorized sponsor, merchandiser, and/or vendor of the Event, where such selling, advertising, or marketing (i) is in connection with, or in proximity to, the Event, or (ii) otherwise has the effect of exploiting the goodwill of the Event and/or gaining market exposure by way of intrusive and/or associative marketing practices.
b. Host shall not cause, engage in, or permit any Ambush Marketing, and, except to the extent Host is prohibited by law from doing so, Host shall prevent and stop Ambush Marketing at, near, or in connection with the Event, including without limitation by:
i. causing its employees and agents to promptly report, to WTC and the proper Host authorities, any marketing or activity reasonably appearing to be Ambush Marketing; ii. ensuring, prior to and during the Event, that the Event perimeter and any other key advertising locations under the Host's control do not carry any form of temporary advertising or promotional material relating to the Event, except as may be approved in writing by WTC (in WTC’s sole discretion);
iii. using, invoking, and applying Host’s powers to protect all trademarks and copyrights associated with the Event;
iv. preventing the distribution of product samples, premiums, promotional literature and other commercial and non-commercial materials within the established Event perimeter or adjacent to the Event site, except where expressly authorized by WTC; v. causing all signage and other physical items of Ambush Marketing to be taken down, moved, removed, and/or confiscated immediately by Host or, if applicable, law enforcement personnel; and
vi. cooperating with WTC to prevent Ambush Marketing, as may reasonably be requested by WTC.

E-5.Termination.
a. Subject to Item E-5(b): If either Party breaches a material provision of this Agreement, the nonbreaching Party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to the other Party (which notice must include a description of such breach) if, during such thirty (30) day period following receipt of such notice, the breaching Party fails to cure such breach. b. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, WTC may immediately terminate this Agreement:
i. at any time if WTC gives written notice to Host that WTC has determined, in its reasonable judgment, that an Event is unlikely to occur or be sufficiently profitable to WTC whether due to: (A) revocation or cancellation of, or failure to timely obtain, any of the Approvals & Permits (as defined in Exhibit C); (B) an insufficient number of paid entries or sponsorships received; or (C) any condition with respect to the Venue that could jeopardize the practicability of conducting the Race as planned, or that could create a safety risk for any Race participants or other Event visitors; Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 16 of 21
Confidential Agreement
ii. if Host files, or in good faith has filed against it, a petition in bankruptcy, or is adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent, or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or an arrangement pursuant to any bankruptcy law; or
iii. if Host causes, engages in, or permits any Ambush Marketing. c. Effects of Termination; Survival.
i. Expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason will not relieve either Party from its obligation to perform under this Agreement to the extent such performance is due prior to the effective time of such termination.
ii. If this Agreement is terminated by WTC under the terms of Item E-5(a) or Item E-5 (b)(ii), all unpaid Annual Payment amounts will be immediately due and payable to WTC.
iii. Each Party reserves all other rights and remedies hereunder and otherwise permitted by law that have accrued prior to the effective time of such expiration or termination. iv. All rights and obligations under this Agreement that arose or accrued prior to termination or expiration of this Agreement, and that, by their nature, should survive any such termination or expiration, will survive any such termination or expiration, including without limitation the rights and obligations set forth in Item E-1 (Financial Matters), Item E-7(Confidentiality), Item E-8 (Exclusivity), Item E-9 (Indemnification; General Limitation of Liability; Liquidated Damages), Item E-11 (Assignment; Binding Effect), Item E-12 (Relationship of the Parties), Item E-13 (Jurisdiction and Dispute Resolution), Item E-14 (Rights and Remedies), Item E-15 (Notices), Item E-16 (Enforcement of Agreement), Item E-17 (No Oral or Implied Waivers or Modifications), Item E-18 (Entire Agreement), and Item E-19 (Interpretation).

E-6.Force Majeure. In the event either Party is prevented from performing any of its obligations under this Agreement by reason of any event outside of such Party’s control, including, without limitation, fire, weather, unsafe conditions, volcano, explosion, flood, landslide, epidemic, acts of nature, war, terrorism, or other hostilities, strike, civil commotion, domestic or foreign governmental acts, orders, or regulations (“Force Majeure Event”), then such obligations of such Party during the duration of such Force Majeure Event, and for a reasonable time thereafter, will be suspended. In the case of cancellation of an Event due to a Force Majeure Event, the Parties agree to negotiate a date to reschedule such Event if practicable. If such canceled Event cannot reasonably be rescheduled or relocated within the Venue, neither Party shall be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement solely because of such cancellation. Neither any such cancellation, rescheduling, or relocation, nor the inability to reschedule or relocate, will, by itself, cause this Agreement to terminate. For purposes of this Agreement, neither the cancellation by WTC of any leg of the Race (e.g., the swim leg), nor the modification of the Race (e.g., distances, routes, etc.), will be deemed to be a cancellation of the Event.

E-7.Confidentiality.
a. During the Term and the 36-month period thereafter, each Party (the “Receiving Party”) shall, other than as provided herein, keep confidential and not use or disclose, directly or indirectly, any of the terms of this Agreement, any trade secrets, confidential, or proprietary information, or any other knowledge, information, documents, or materials, owned, developed, or possessed by the other Party, whether in tangible or intangible form (collectively, “Confidential Information”).
b. Confidential Information does not include any information that the Receiving Party conclusively establishes: (i) entered the public domain without Receiving Party’s breach of any obligation owed to the disclosing Party; (ii) became known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosing Party’s disclosure of such information to such Receiving Party; (iii) is permitted to be disclosed by the prior written consent of the disclosing Party; (iv) became known to the Receiving Party Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 17 of 21
Confidential Agreement
from a source other than the disclosing Party, other than by breach of any obligation of confidentiality owed to the disclosing Party; or (v) was independently developed by the Receiving Party without breach of this Agreement.
c. The Receiving Party shall take all lawful measures to prevent the unauthorized use and disclosure of Confidential Information, and to prevent unauthorized persons or entities from obtaining or using Confidential Information. The Receiving Party shall refrain from directly or indirectly taking any action that would constitute or facilitate the unauthorized use or disclosure of Confidential Information.
d. The Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information to its officers and employees to the extent necessary to enable the Receiving Party to perform its obligations hereunder, but only if such officers and employees shall have entered into appropriate confidentiality agreements for secrecy and nonuse of Confidential Information which by its terms shall be enforceable by injunctive relief by the disclosing Party. The Receiving Party shall be liable for any unauthorized use and disclosure of Confidential Information by any of its officers or employees. e. The Receiving Party may disclose the terms of this Agreement to (i) its attorneys and other professional advisors who have a professional duty to the Receiving Party to keep confidential such information or (ii) a third party that has entered into a reasonably standard confidentiality agreement with the Receiving Party that prohibits such third party from disclosing such terms, where such third party requires to review this Agreement for purposes of evaluating a proposed (A) purchase by such third party of assets of or equity interests in the Receiving Party or (B) financing transaction involving the borrowing of funds or establishing a credit facility or other financing arrangement, in each case where Receiving Party would be the borrower or guarantor of such debt.
f. If the Receiving Party is required to disclose Confidential Information in order to comply with applicable law, regulations, court order, or other legal process, the Receiving Party agrees to provide reasonable advance written notice to the disclosing Party and each of the Parties shall use its reasonable efforts to secure confidential treatment of the Confidential Information to be disclosed (whether through protective orders or otherwise) and to ensure that only the minimum amount of Confidential Information necessary to comply with such requirements is disclosed.

E-8.Exclusivity.
a. Use of Racecourse and Event-Related Areas. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement: During the period between (and including) the Monday preceding the Race Date until (and including) the Friday following the Race Date (collectively, the “Event Period”), Host shall not produce, conduct, host, or permit any event (other than such Event) that takes place, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Race course or at any Event-related area; provided, however, that during the Event Period (excluding Race day) private functions and corporate events may take place but only if such events do not do or include any of the following:
i. include any endurance-, running-, road cycling-, or swimming-related race, competition or event;
ii. include any vendor exposition, tradeshow, and/or the selling of any merchandise and/or services;
iii. occur on the Race course or at any other area where any part of the Event is being conducted, or adversely affect the ingress or egress to or from any such areas; iv. in any way jeopardize or adversely impact Event production or operations; v. infringe on any WTC intellectual property rights; or Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 18 of 21
Confidential Agreement
vi. include or constitute Ambush Marketing or otherwise promote themselves as purportedly being part of or in connection with the Event). b. Advertising Other Triathlon, Running, & Cycling Companies or Long-Distance Triathlons, Marathons, & Cycling Races. During the Term, Host shall not permit its website to display any marketing, promotion, advertisement, reference, or the like, of (i) any other triathlon event series or company, including but not limited to World Triathlon (f/k/a International Triathlon Union), Professional Triathletes Organization (PTO), Revolution3 Triathlon, Life Time Fitness Triathlon, Challenge Family Triathlon, CLASH Endurance, Topman Triathlon and HITS Triathlon (or any of their respective successors or assigns), (ii) any person, entity, or group (other than WTC or any subsidiary or licensee thereof) that operates, organizes, produces, or is otherwise involved in any triathlon having a distance longer than that of an “Olympic” distance triathlon (as such distance is defined by World Triathlon), (iii) any triathlon having a distance longer than that of an “Olympic” distance triathlon (as such distance is defined by World Triathlon), unless such triathlon is owned or operated by WTC or any subsidiary or licensee of WTC, (iv) any other endurance series or events, including but not limited to any running series or company and any cycling series or company, (v) any person, entity, or group (other than WTC or any subsidiary or licensee thereof) that operates, organizes, produces, or is otherwise involved in any running or cycling races, or (vi) any running or cycling races, unless such race is owned or operated by WTC or any subsidiary or licensee of WTC.
c. Non-Competition. During the Term and the twenty-eight (28)-month period thereafter, Host shall not produce, support, advertise, promote, conduct, host, permit, or contract or partner with any person or entity (other than WTC or a subsidiary thereof) for or in connection with, any other triathlon, running event, or cycling event located, in whole or in part, within the Venue or anywhere within 75 miles of the Venue if such event features any race distance longer than that of: an “Olympic” distance triathlon (as such distance is defined by World Triathlon), a 5k run, or 60k cycling event.

E-9.Indemnification; General Limitation of Liability; Liquidated Damages. a. Each Party (the “Indemnifying Party”) shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the other Party, its parent, subsidiaries, and affiliates, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, contractors, volunteers, representatives, and agents (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, injuries, demands, actions, causes of action, suits, proceedings, judgments, and expenses, including without limitation, attorneys’ fees, court costs, and other legal expenses (“Claims”), arising out of, directly or indirectly, or in connection with: (i) any breach or alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement by the other Party or any representation or warranty made by the other Party herein; (ii) any act or omission to act by the other Party, or any of its employees, servants, or agents; (iii) any facilities, venues, or accommodations provided by or on behalf of such Party that violate any applicable laws (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act); or (iv) any dangerous conditions on, or with respect to, any roads, facilities, venues, or accommodations controlled or maintained by such Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Indemnifying Party shall have no obligation to indemnify any Indemnified Party to the extent that the applicable Claim is caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnified Party.
b. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY IN THIS AGREEMENT: WTC’S TOTAL

MAXIMUM LIABILITY FOR ANY AND ALL LOSSES, INJURY, OR DAMAGES IN ANY WAY ARISING

OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT (WHETHER ARISING OUT OF BREACH OF

CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE) AND FOR ANY OTHER CLAIM, WILL BE LIMITED TO THE

AMOUNT OF ANNUAL PAYMENTS (AS DEFINED HEREIN) BY HOST, UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS

AGREEMENT, THAT ARE RECEIVED AND RETAINED BY WTC DURING THE THEN PRECEDING 24-MONTH PERIOD. THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SET FORTH HEREIN IS FOR ANY AND ALL

MATTERS FOR WHICH WTC MAY OTHERWISE HAVE LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR IN Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 19 of 21
Confidential Agreement

CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER THE CLAIM ARISES IN CONTRACT, TORT,

STATUTE OR OTHERWISE, AND THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS CUMULATIVE, WITH ALL

PAYMENTS FOR CLAIMS OR DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT BEING AGGREGATED TO DETERMINE SATISFACTION OF THE LIMIT. THE EXISTENCE OF ONE OR MORE CLAIMS WILL NOT ENLARGE THE LIMIT.
c. The Parties acknowledge that the goodwill inherent in the IRONMAN 70.3® brand and the Event Logo arises and is maintained, in large part, by each and every IRONMAN 70.3® event worldwide, including the Event, being conducted as scheduled. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Parties acknowledge that Host’s failure or inability to host and support the Event as scheduled, absent a Force Majeure Event, will cause WTC irreparable harm, and that damages will be an insufficient and wholly inadequate remedy as a result of such a breach. If Host breaches this Agreement and such breach results in any Event not taking place when and as contemplated by this Agreement, Host shall pay WTC, within thirty (30) days after receiving written demand from WTC, the amount of $400,000.00 (USD)(“Liquidated Damages”). The Parties intend that the Liquidated Damages are to provide for compensation for a portion of the damages suffered by WTC, are not intended as a penalty and that the stipulated amount is far less than the actual damages and consequential damages that would result from such a breach by Host. d. This Section will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason.

E-10. Insurance. Each Party shall, throughout the Term, obtain and maintain its own commercial general liability insurance for each Event from a reputable insurance company for claims of bodily injury, death, property damage, and personal and advertising liability, including contractual liability coverage and any and all litigation, arbitration and settlement costs, related to any claims for or by any Event participants, volunteers, referees, officials, scorekeepers, spectators, sponsors, and staff with a minimum combined single limit equal to but not less than two million U.S. dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence for any one incident or accident, and not less than five million U.S. dollars ($5,000,000.00) in aggregate, which limits may be satisfied with any combination of primary and excess coverage; provided, that, any such excess coverage follows form of the primary coverage. WTC shall include the Host Indemnified Parties as additional insureds on a primary and non-contributory basis on its commercial general liability and umbrella liability (if any) policies for claims arising in connection with WTC’s operations and activities related to the Event. Host shall include the WTC Indemnified Parties as additional insureds on a primary and non-contributory basis on its commercial general liability and umbrella liability (if any) policies for claims arising in connection with Host’s operations and activities related to the Event. Certificates evidencing the foregoing required insurance must be provided, upon request, to the other Party.

E-11. Assignment; Binding Effect. No rights or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned or delegated by Host without the prior written consent of WTC. Any purported assignment or delegation in violation of this Section is void ab initio. All of the terms of this Agreement will apply to, be binding upon, and enure to the benefit of the Parties hereto, their successors, and permitted assigns. Subject to the immediately preceding sentence, no third party will have any rights or remedies under this Agreement.

E-12. Relationship of the Parties. The Parties are acting herein solely as independent contractors. Nothing herein contained will create or be construed as creating a partnership, joint venture, or agency relationship between the Parties. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that it neither has nor will give the appearance or impression of having any legal authority to bind or commit the other Party in any way. Each Party will be solely responsible for all wages, income taxes, worker’s compensation, and any other requirements for all personnel it supplies in connection with this Agreement.

E-13. Jurisdiction and Dispute Resolution.
a. Governing Law. Notwithstanding the place where this Agreement may be executed by either Party, this Agreement and any claim, controversy, dispute or other matter arising hereunder or related hereto (whether by contract, tort or otherwise) shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida, without regard to the conflict of laws provisions thereof that would result in the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. In any litigation arising out of or relating to Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 20 of 21
Confidential Agreement
this Agreement, the Parties agree that venue shall be solely in either the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, or a Florida state court located in Hillsborough County, Florida (each, a “Tampa Court”).
b. Arbitration. If a dispute, claim or controversy, with the exception of claims for injunctive and/or other equitable relief for intellectual property violations, unfair competition and/or the use and/or unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets or confidential information arises out of, relates to, or is in connection with this Agreement, any amendment of this Agreement or any breach of this Agreement (“Dispute”), and if the Dispute cannot be settled through direct discussions between the Parties, the Parties agree to settle the Dispute by arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) whereby such Dispute shall be referred to a sole arbitrator selected by the Parties, or, if the parties are unable or unwilling to agree to such a selection, to AAA arbitration as the sole remedy as to all matters in Dispute, administered by the AAA in accordance with applicable Arbitration Rules to include the Optional Rules for Emergency Measures of Protection and Optional Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes, as interpreted and governed by the Florida Arbitration Code. The venue of any such arbitration shall be solely in Tampa, Florida. Judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered solely in a Tampa Court. The arbitrator shall not have authority to award punitive or other damages in excess of compensatory damages and each Party irrevocably waives any claim thereto.
c. Enforcement. If either Party brings any arbitration or other action under this Agreement (including, without limitation, any challenge or appeal), the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover from the other Party reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs (including, without limitation, the cost of such arbitration or other action). The Parties agree to authorize the arbitrator to determine both the entitlement and apportionment of such fees and costs. d. Arbitration Charges. Each Party shall initially bear an equal share of the arbitrator’s compensation and administrative charges of the arbitration and shall make deposits with the AAA of its share of the amounts requested by the AAA. Failure or refusal by a Party to timely pay its share of the deposits for the arbitrator(s)’ compensation and administrative charges shall constitute a waiver by that Party of its rights to be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and assert counterclaims. Informing the arbitrator of a Party’s failure to pay its share of the deposits for the arbitrator’s compensation and administrative charges for the purpose of implementing this provision will not be deemed to affect the arbitrator(s)’ impartiality or ability to proceed with the arbitration.
e. General. The requirement for arbitration will not be deemed a waiver of any right of termination under this Agreement and the arbitrator is not empowered to act or make any award other than based solely on the rights and obligations of the Parties prior to any such termination. The Parties, their representatives, other participants and the arbitrator shall hold the existence, content, and result of arbitration in confidence. Any provisions of this Agreement not found to be in compliance with applicable law may be waived without effect on the agreement by the Parties to arbitrate as provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of breach by a Party of any of its obligations hereunder, the non-breaching Party may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in any Tampa Court. A request by a Party to a court for interim measures shall not be deemed a waiver of the obligation to arbitrate.

E-14. Rights and Remedies. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are given in addition to any other rights and remedies either Party may have by law, statute, ordinance or otherwise. All such rights and remedies are intended to be cumulative, and the use of any one right or remedy by either Party shall not preclude or waive its right to any or all other rights or remedies.

E-15. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if emailed, hand delivered, or delivered by certified or registered mail or by overnight delivery service:

Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 21 of 21
Confidential Agreement
If to WTC:

WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION
3407 West Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Ste. 100
Tampa, Florida 33607
Attention: Chief Legal Officer
E-mail: [email protected]
(or to such other person or address as WTC identifies to Host in accordance with this Section) If to Host: to the address listed on page 1 of this Agreement, to the attention of Legal Department (or to such other person or address as Host may communicate to WTC in accordance with this Section).

E-16. Enforcement of Agreement. Host hereby agrees to waive all defenses, if any, to enforcement of this Agreement that Host might otherwise have under the doctrine of sovereign immunity (or similar doctrine) in connection with any law, regulation, ordinance, decree, order, or any other source or authority.

E-17. No Oral or Implied Waivers or Modifications. If either Party fails to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any rights hereunder or fails to exercise any election provided in this Agreement, it will not be considered to be a waiver of those provisions, rights or elections or in any way affect the validity of this Agreement. The failure of either Party to exercise any of these provisions, rights or elections will not preclude or prejudice such Party from later enforcing or exercising the same or any other provisions, rights or elections which it may have under this Agreement. No waiver will be of any force or effect unless set forth in a writing signed by the Party whose right is being waived. Subject to the immediately preceding sentence, no modifications to this Agreement will be binding upon the Parties unless modified, amended, cancelled, renewed, or extended in a writing signed by both Parties.

E-18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including all exhibits hereto) sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and, with respect to such subject matter, supersedes all prior agreements, arrangements and understandings, written or oral, between the Parties.

Except as may be expressly set forth herein, there are no promises, conditions, representations, understanding, interpretations or terms of any kind as conditions or inducement to the execution hereof or in effect between the Parties.

E-19. Interpretation. The section headings included in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect or be utilized in construing or interpreting this Agreement. If any term, clause or provision hereof is held invalid or unenforceable by the arbitrator or a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity will not affect the validity or operation of any other term, clause or provision and such invalid term, clause, or provision will be deemed to be severed from this Agreement, provided that both the economic and legal substance of the transactions that this Agreement contemplates are not affected in a manner materially adverse to either Party. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original binding document but all of which will constitute one and the same instrument. Neither this Agreement nor any provision herein will be construed in favor or against either Party based on which Party drafted this Agreement or such provision. The exchange of copies of this Agreement and of signature pages by facsimile transmission, by e-mail, in “portable document format” (PDF) form, or by any other electronic means intended to preserve the original graphic and pictorial appearance of a document, or by a combination of any such means, constitutes effective execution and delivery of this Agreement as to the Parties and may be used in lieu of an original Agreement or signature pages for all purposes. For the avoidance of doubt:
signatures of the Parties transmitted by facsimile, email, or other electronic means will be deemed to be their original signatures for all purposes.
* * * * * *
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: October 7, 2025 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the Mayor to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc., outlining the cooperating framework to support the Ironman 70.3 branded endurance triathlon to take place in the City of Redding on August 16, 2026, August 15, 2027, and August 13, 2028; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $95,000 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 & $128,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to support the Ironman 70.3 event.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of the City of Redding (City) entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc. (Choose Redding), is $95,000 for Fiscal Year (FY) 26, $128,000 for FY 27 and FY 28, and $73,000 for FY 29. Further breakdown of cost expenses is broken down below.

FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 FY29
Police $0 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000
Fire $0 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000
Community
Services
$40,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Public Works $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $0
Shuttle Services $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Miscellaneous $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Total $95,000 $128,000 $128,000 $73,000
MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.1(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(d)--Consider Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marking Group, Inc.

Jason Gibilisco, Management
Assistant to the City Manager
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: January 20, 2026 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group Page 2 The City will be providing necessary measures to provide adequate public safety, trail maintenance and paving, road maintenance and paving, garbage collection, and transporting Ironman participants from the Civic Center to Whiskeytown on race day.

The City of Redding will see increases in Transient occupancy tax (TOT) and sales tax. Choose Redding anticipates the City to see an increase of TOT by $152,000 or more for race week. The total TOT Return for the week of the Ironman 70.3 race will be around $345,000.

TOT returns are based on room rates and it is typical for rates to start increasing the closer it gets to the race date. When rates are higher it means an increase in TOT return. This also makes it difficult to accurately project TOT return. It is expected that all Redding room rentals will be sold out during race weekend.

There will also be an increase in sales tax. Sales tax revenue for the week will not be a significant increase. The event operator World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) operates an Ironman 70.3 sales tent solely for race gear and merchandise, and it is common to sell $1,000,000 worth of merchandise during its operation over race weekend. Estimated sales tax revenue solely from the Ironman 70.3 sales tent is estimated to be $10,000.

Choose Redding has committed financial support to the World Triathlon Corporation for the Ironman 70.3 event for the three-year term beginning at $200,000 the first year, $210,000 the second year, and $220,500 the third year. This does not include other costs that Choose Redding will cover.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the MOU and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
In September 2025, Choose Redding hosted a tour for representatives from WTC to gauge if the area surrounding the City would be a good location to host an Ironman 70.3 branded endurance triathlon. On September 18, 2025, Choose Redding contacted the City to announce that WTC chose the Redding area for a three-year term with the first event scheduled for August 2026, with subsequent events in August 2027, and August 2028.

On October 7, 2025, City staff brought forward the Host Venue Agreement from the WTC to the Council. After further review of the Host Venue Agreement with the City Attorney, signing on to be the host, was not in the best interest of the City. There were a number of tasks that fall outside of the City’s purview and jurisdiction. Choose Redding agreed to sign on with the WTC and operate as the host knowing that the City would be partnering with them and covering certain requirements.

The attached MOU splits the services required from the WTC to successfully run the Ironman

70.3 event. The City will be taking on roles such as:

Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: January 20, 2026 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group Page 3

1. Expediating any necessary approvals and permits as required by the City;

2. Command post coordination, law enforcement services, and counterterrorism measures;

3. Coordination of an economic impact study, if necessary;

4. Race course exclusivity in coordinating necessary City street closures;

5. Sending notifications to impacted City residents;

6. Coordination of shuttle services; and

7. Street cleaning and waste management services.

Choose Redding will be operating as the host and agreed to take on a number of roles in the MOU. Some of those roles include providing complimentary hotel rooms; ambulance and medical services; concessions; infrastructure equipment for electricity, lighting, and internet; lavatories; volunteers; and a number of other roles.

The City and Choose Redding has already begun planning for the event. The Ironman 70.3 involves multiple agency coordination and approvals from Shasta County, the California Department of Transportation, California Highway Patrol, National Park Service, Redding Chamber of Commerce and Visit Redding. All groups are generally supportive of the event and working through any know obstacles that have been communicated.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Budget Resolution
^Memorandum of Understanding
10-7-25 Staff Report
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: January 20, 2026 Staff Report (9.1(a)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the City of Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Second Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to accepting this report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The attached December Financial Report shows that Redding Electric Utility (REU) outperformed budget projections in Net Operating Revenues for the first six months of the fiscal year. While slightly higher revenues and lower Power Cost and Generation/System Operation and Maintenance (O&M) contributed to the positive results, the variance was primarily driven by the timing of expenses and deferred activities. These timing differences are temporary and are expected to fully align with budgeted assumptions in future reporting periods. Although unrestricted reserves decreased by approximately $6.1 million through December, the Utility anticipates approximately $3 million in reimbursements in February for second-quarter capital outlays. For context, the Utility received $6.5 million in bond reimbursements in November for first-quarter capital outlays. The cash reserve balance remains in compliance with the Council’s Financial Management Policy.

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.5(a)--Consider Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 274
Report to Redding City Council February 12, 2026
Re: 9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter Page 2 Revenue
Billed retail revenue through December was $993,043 (1.3 percent) above budget, reflecting elevated system energy usage during the period, influenced in part by seasonal weather conditions. Total wholesale sales were $40,261 (0.5 percent) above budget. Overall, operating revenue was $1,220,171 (1.4 percent) above budget. Operating revenue after energy costs was $2,007,670 (4.7 percent) above budget, primarily driven by higher-than-budgeted retail revenue, with secondary contributions from lower-than-budgeted generation, transmission, and Joint Powers Agency costs. Timing differences in certain operating expenses also contributed modestly to the variance and are expected to normalize in subsequent reporting periods.

Expenses
Power Cost (Cost of Energy)
The combined costs for generation, purchases from the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), Big Horn Wind Project, contracts, and the spot market were $787,500 (1.8 percent) below budget projections. This variance is within normal budgetary expectations and reflects routine fluctuations in energy procurement and operating conditions during the period. The total cost of energy increased by $1,025,996 (2.5 percent) year over year. The Power Cost for the load (Power Cost less Wholesale Sales) increased by $1,538,414 year over year (4.6 percent), primarily reflecting changes in net energy procurement and system operating conditions.

System Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
System O&M costs for the first six months of the fiscal year were $3,966,514 (12.9 percent) below budget projections. The favorable variance was primarily driven by the timing of expenses and deferred activities, with additional savings attributable to personnel costs.

Debt Service and Capital Outlay
Debt service payments and obligations through December totaled $9.4 million (on plan). Capital expenditure totaled $9.1 million (47.8 percent spent). The pace of spending is consistent with expectations for this stage of the fiscal year. These expenditures are bond-funded, ensuring that the capital program is fully supported by dedicated financing rather than impacting operating budgets. Continued monitoring will ensure that remaining projects stay on schedule and within budget throughout the year.

Special Fund Expenditures
Special Fund Expenditures, which include spending for Public Benefit and Cap-and-Trade Programs, totaled $1,671,234 (representing 17.0 percent of the budget) through December. Staff are actively reviewing initiatives and identifying opportunities to deploy the remaining allocated funds, ensuring that program objectives are met and resources are used effectively throughout the fiscal year.

Packet Pg. 275
Report to Redding City Council February 12, 2026
Re: 9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter Page 3 Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance
At the end of December, the unrestricted cash balance was $39.1 million, representing approximately 96 days of cash on hand. REU’s Financial Management Policy (Council Policy 1414) requires a minimum of 75 days of cash and aims for 150 days of cash. With the anticipated receipt of approximately $3.0 million in bond reimbursements in February related to secondquarter capital outlays, unrestricted cash is expected to increase by approximately 7 days, resulting in approximately 103 days of cash on hand, further strengthening compliance with the Council’s financial policy.

Director’s Contingency Fund
The REU Director’s Contingency Fund was not utilized through December.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Notes on Financial Operating Statement
Attachment 2 - Electric Utility Financial Results for Dec 2025 Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for Dec 2025 Attachment 4 - Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance Dec 2025 Attachment 5 - Electric Utility Industry Update for Dec 2025 Packet Pg. 276
Attachment 1
City of Redding Electric Utility
Notes to Financial Report
Notes on Financial Operating Statement
Operating revenues are divided into three revenue elements: Retail Sales are sales of electricity to end-use customers; Wholesale Sales are to customers who resell electricity; and Other Revenue, which includes the sale of services, joint-pole arrangements, interest income, and other miscellaneous revenue generated in the operations of Redding Electric Utility (REU).

Operating Expenses are divided into two expense elements: Power Cost and System O&M. Cost of Energy summarizes Purchased Power costs. The primary sources of purchased power include Western Area Power Administration deliveries and long-term contracts for Wind Energy through M-S-R. Fuel expenses, purchases from the spot market, and expenses associated with participation in the California Independent System Operator make up the remainder. The Generation and Transmission component comprises power plant variable costs (fuel) and fixed costs (all non-fuel costs), as well as all JPA costs (M-S-R and TANC), except Wind Energy.

The Wholesale Sales and Power Costs budgets are based on known contracts and confirmed resources. Throughout the year, efforts have been made to provide our ratepayers with the most cost-effective energy supply. This is often achieved by buying and selling natural gas or electricity to lower overall costs. This could include selling natural gas and replacing it with less expensive electricity rather than burning it at our power plant. It might also involve selling energy contracted at one trading hub and buying it at another, less expensive one. Additionally, we optimize the value of our gas storage facility by purchasing natural gas when prices are low and using or selling it in other months. All these transactions benefit our customers but tend to inflate the Wholesale Sales and Cost of Energy figures above their original budgets. This occurs because accounting rules require us to record these transactions at their gross revenue and expense amounts, not based on the utility's net benefit.

System O&M Expenses summarizes costs for all other functional groups, i.e., Administration, Customer Services, Engineering, Financial Services, Line, Compliance, and Resources. Special Revenue funds, i.e., Public Benefits and Cap-and-Trade, are shown separately. Debt Service is paid twice per fiscal year, once in December and again in June. Capital Outlay includes currentyear appropriations and unfinished projects approved by the Council in prior years.

This financial report provides year-to-date comparisons to the current budget and the same yearto-date results for the prior year. Operating revenues are reported as billed. Costs for energy, other operating expenses, and capital outlay are recorded when paid. For this report, debt payments are spread evenly over the year, giving a more helpful picture of the financial results. Projections are based on normal weather trends and known industry activity. If actual weather conditions are above or below average for the month or an unexpected industry disruption occurs, revenue and expenses will increase or decrease accordingly. REU’s residential and small commercial rate structures are heavily weighted on volumetric charges ($/kWh), and abnormal weather causes more significant variances in net operating results, emphasizing the difference between the rate structure and cost structure.

The recorded results are preliminary and subject to revision until the final audit is complete.

Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Notes on Financial Operating Statement (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL RESULTS - DECEMBER 31, 2025
YTD-Actual YTD-Budget Variance Variance YTD-Actual
December December % Value December
Item FY2026 FY2026 FY2026 FY2026 FY2025
Energy
System Load (MWh) 414,675 410,177 1.1% 4,498 430,910
Key Performance Indicators
Days Cash on Hand 96 89
Operating Revenues
Retail Sales 78,797,043 77,804,000 1.3% 993,043 78,224,304 Wholesale Sales 7,880,801 7,840,540 0.5% 40,261 8,393,220 Miscellaneous Income 1,136,616 949,750 19.7% 186,866 3,539,651 Total Operating Revenues 87,814,461 86,594,290 1.4% 1,220,171 90,157,175 Operating Expenses
Power Cost
Purchased Power 12,729,671 10,265,200 24.0% 2,464,470 10,359,442 Generation, Transmission and JPA (Variable) 16,168,318 17,265,200 -6.4% (1,096,882) 16,774,894 Generation A&G and O&M (Fixed) 13,777,575 15,932,664 -13.5% (2,155,089) 14,515,232 Subtotal Power Cost 42,675,564 43,463,064 -1.8% (787,500) 41,649,568 System O&M
General & Administrative 2,841,640 4,032,166 -29.5% (1,190,526) 2,558,965 Interdepartmental (Incl. In-Lieu of Tax) 5,862,325 5,871,345 -0.2% (9,020) 6,362,235 Transmission & Distribution 16,469,716 19,236,684 -14.4% (2,766,968) 15,200,099 Customer & Field Services 1,707,680 1,707,680 0.0% (0) 1,584,834 Subtotal System O&M 26,881,360 30,847,874 -12.9% (3,966,514) 25,706,133 Total Operating Expenses 69,556,924 $ 74,310,938 $ -6.4% (4,754,013) $ 67,355,700 $ Net Operating Revenue 18,257,536 $ 12,283,353 $ 48.6% 5,974,184 $ 22,801,475 $ Total Debt Service 9,361,273 $ 9,374,400 $ 0% (13,128) $ 7,188,302 $ YTD-Actual Budget % of Budget Budget YTD-Actual
December Annual Spent Remaining December
Item FY2026 FY2026 FY2026 FY2026 FY2025
Capital Outlay
Capital Outlay (Revenue Funded) 8,221,726
Capital Outlay (Bond Funded) 9,067,693 18,952,000 47.8% 9,884,307 - Total Capital Outlay 9,067,693 $ 18,952,000 $ 47.8% 9,884,307 $ 8,221,726 $ Special Fund Expenditures
Public Benefit Programs 1,085,519 6,974,765 15.6% 5,889,246 1,182,049 Cap-and-Trade Programs 585,714 2,866,370 20.4% 2,280,656 63,467 Total Special Fund Expenditures 1,671,234 $ 9,841,135 $ 17.0% 8,169,901 $ 1,245,517 $ Financial Results (1,842,663) $ 6,145,930 $
Council Report
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Electric Utility Financial Results for Dec 2025 (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL DASHBOARD - DECEMBER 31, 2025 1.5 0.91.72.6 0.41.0 -
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16
18 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$-Millions
Retail Sales ($-Millions)
Cumulative Difference 2025 Actual 2026 Actual 2026 Budget -1.2
-0.9
-0.6
-0.2 -0.1

0.0 (2)
(1)
-
1 2
3 4
5 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$-Millions
Wholesale Sales ($-Millions)
Cumulative Difference 2025 Actual 2026 Actual 2026 Budget Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for Dec 2025 (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL DASHBOARD - DECEMBER 31, 2025 -7.0 -7.4 -7.5-5.6 -6.6-4.8 (10)
(5)
-
5 10
15 20
25 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$-Millions
Total Operating Expense ($-Millions)
Cumulative Difference 2025 Actual 2026 Actual 2026 Budget 0.4 0.0 1.4 2.8 0.61.2 -
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16
18 20

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$-Millions
Total Operating Revenues ($-Millions)
Cumulative Difference 2025 Actual 2026 Actual 2026 Budget Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for Dec 2025 (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter) Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Unrestricted Cash - 2025-26 38.4 36.8 40.6 42.9 42.0 39.1Unrestricted Cash - 2024-25 33.5 38.5 38.9 34.3 33.2 32.6 33.4 36.6 35.8 54.4 48.1 45.2

20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0
MILLION $

REU UNRESTRICTED CASH BALANCE
JULY 2024 ‐ JUNE 2026
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Attachment 4 - Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance Dec 2025 (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's 1 City of Redding Electric Utility
Industry Activities Update —2nd Quarter FY2026
Federal Update
Following a 43-day federal government shutdown, Congress enacted FY 2026 appropriations, restoring federal operations and funding key agencies. However, broader federal policy shifts have constrained renewable development and altered long-term incentives. These recent federal actions have created a more uncertain policy environment for clean energy resources, infrastructure investment, transportation electrification, and utility planning.

In 2025, legislative actions scaled back key Inflation Reduction Act clean energy incentives and introduced tariffs on inputs critical to renewable generation, contributing to widespread project delays, cancellations, and heightened financial uncertainty across the clean energy sector.

Simultaneously, a shift in federal land-use policy has constrained wind and solar development, while ongoing legal challenges to California’s zero-emission vehicle authority have injected additional uncertainty into the state’s transportation electrification efforts.

Despite these headwinds, Congress approved a bipartisan FY 2026 appropriations “minibus” that continues funding for select energy-related programs, including grid protection, energy efficiency, wildfire management, and water and land management agencies. Federal discussions in 2026 remain focused on permitting reform, grid reliability, affordability, and forest management.

Proposed reforms seek to streamline permitting timelines for energy and infrastructure projects, including hydropower, while improving forest health and wildfire resilience. Testimony from public power representatives emphasized the importance of proactive vegetation management, streamlined approvals for routine grid work, and liability reforms to protect ratepayers.

Collectively, these developments reflect a shifting federal landscape that constrains renewable investment incentives, increases regulatory and legal risk, and places greater responsibility on state, local, and regional initiatives to advance reliability, affordability, and climate objectives.

State Legislative Update
The second year of the 2025–26 California legislative session began in December, with several two-year bills carried over and subject to a January 31 deadline. While fewer energy-specific bills are expected in 2026, legislative priorities remain focused on energy affordability, wildfire mitigation and liability, local permitting reform, and responses to evolving federal energy policy.

At the January Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) Strategic Conference, legislative leaders emphasized affordability as the Legislature’s top energy priority, identifying wildfire mitigation costs as the single largest contributor to rising electricity costs statewide.

Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Electric Utility Industry Update for Dec 2025 (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter) 2 State Regulatory Update
Regulatory activity continues to evolve across multiple agencies. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) repealed the private fleet provisions of the Advanced Clean Fleets regulation following developments related to a federal waiver, leaving the requirements applicable only to public fleets. As a public utility, Redding Electric Utility (REU), through the California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA) and NCPA, continues to advocate for operational exemptions and flexibility related to daily use, mutual aid, and vehicle procurement. Updated regulatory language is expected in early 2026.

CARB also released proposed revisions to the Cap-and-Invest program that would reduce greenhouse gas allowance inventories starting in 2027. These changes pose potential financial risks to electric utilities. REU and its partners are advocating for the preservation of existing allowance allocations through 2030, consistent with AB 1207, to maintain customer affordability.

The California Energy Commission (CEC) adopted the 10th Edition of the Renewables Portfolio Standard Eligibility Guidebook in December 2025, providing clarifications related to energy storage and renewable accounting. In addition, implementation of SB 1158 will require hourly emissions reporting beginning in 2028; REU is coordinating with CMUA to ensure reporting requirements remain practical and cost-effective.

The California Earthquake Authority (CEA) is developing the AB 254 Natural Catastrophe Resilience Study to evaluate long-term reforms related to insurance access, wildfire mitigation, and liability. While publicly owned utilities are not subject to the California Wildfire Fund, which administered by CEA, the study’s findings are expected to inform broader wildfire risk mitigation strategies.

Conclusion
REU staff, in coordination with NCPA and CMUA, remain actively engaged with policymakers to protect public power interests and ensure policies support safe, reliable, and affordable electric service. As one of California’s lowest-cost electric providers, REU remains focused on maintaining affordability and reliability while navigating a changing policy environment, managing risk, advancing clean energy goals, and preserving local control and rate stability.

Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Electric Utility Industry Update for Dec 2025 (9.5(a)--Electric Utility's Financial Report - 2nd Quarter)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve setting a Public Hearing on March 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider increases in Redding Electric Utility rates (four and one-half percent increase per year) effective beginning with the April 1, 2026, billing cycle and continuing with the January 1, 2027, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2029, billing cycles, along with an increase to the Residential Energy Discount benefit for income-qualified households.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with setting the public hearing.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to set the public hearing as proposed and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Redding Electric Utility (REU) increased rates in 2024 and 2025 by four percent per year to address aging infrastructure, rising power supply costs, inflationary pressures, and to fund REU’s Senate Bill 901 Wildfire Mitigation Plan. Continued infrastructure replacement and associated debt service, along with rising power supply costs driven by California’s clean energy mandates, the phaseout of tax credits, and tariffs on clean energy technologies, continue to drive the need for additional rate increases. REU has mitigated these cost pressures to the extent possible by identifying personnel savings, reducing capital expenditures, and capping controllable operations and maintenance cost growth below inflation through reductions in discretionary spending.

REU’s current biennial budget, adopted by the Council on June 17, 2025, included a five-year MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.5(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.5(b)--Consider setting a Public Hearing for March 3, 2026, regarding Redding Electric Utility rate increases.

Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 284
Report to Redding City Council February 9, 2026
Re: 9.5(b)--Set Public Hearing regarding REU rate increases Page 2 financial plan. The financial plan included a five percent rate increase every year through 2030.

After several months of analysis, which resulted in operational, capital, and administrative savings both realized and anticipated, staff has modified their proposal to four and one-half percent increases through 2029, with a two percent increase projected in 2030.

The effect of the proposed changes on each customer’s utility bill will depend on several factors, including how much electricity is used each month. On average, standard residential customers are expected to see an increase of approximately $7 per month in 2026 and 2027, and approximately $8 per month in 2028 and 2029. In addition, staff will recommend increasing the Residential Energy Discount (Public Benefits Program) for all Residential and Residential MultiFamily customers, mitigating a portion of the rate increase for income-qualified customers funded by the State mandated public benefits charge (approximately $500,000 of additional funds will be made available to participants in the program on an annual basis). Commercial customers will experience varying impacts due to differences in their energy usage and business size.

REU will provide tables and calculators to the public before the public hearing. These tools will be accessible on the City's website and at two separate public workshops. They will display estimated changes in bills for different types of customers. Customers can also enter their own energy usage to see how these changes may affect them.

Staff projections show that REU would remain the lowest electric provider in the area, with standard residential bills for REU, Shasta Lake, and PG&E currently at $160, $188, and $344, respectively and all utilities projecting rate increases annually through 2029.

Following their participation in the development of REU’s 2030 Strategic Plan, five community members from the original nine-person panel, representing a cross-section of REU’s customer base, continued their involvement through a two-part meeting series to review REU’s budget, financial plan, cost-of-service study, and proposed rate plan. The panel reached consensus that the proposed rate increases are appropriate, fair, and equitable, and provide the best balance of affordability, rate stability, and long-term financial health of the Utility.

Additional public workshops will be held prior to the public hearing, both in-person and webbased, to ensure inclusion, and information will be provided directly to community-based organizations.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 285