Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA
March 3, 2026
6:00 PM
This meeting will include teleconference participation by Vice Mayor Dr. Paul Dhanuka (Government Code Section 54953). In addition to the meeting location above, members of the public may participate in the meeting from the following teleconference location:
Avalon West Hollywood Lobby
7316 Santa Monica Blvd
West Hollywood, CA 90046
1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MIKE LITTAU
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Dan Conklin, Redding Police and Fire Departments' Chaplain C. Roll Call
3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.
PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC
COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non -agendized matters within the City’s jurisdictio n.
The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted their name through the electronic kiosk , the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.
If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please enter your name in the electronic kiosk located in the lobby. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on -line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.gov and in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.
PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.
Redding City Council March 3, 2026
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no f urther deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please enter your name in the electronic kiosk located in the lobby before the Consent Calendar is considered . It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of th e agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.
4.2(a). Adopt Resolution declaring April 2026 as Fair Housing Month in the City of Redding.
4.5(a). Authorize and approve the following actions related to Request fo r Proposal Schedule No. 5650 – Overhaul of two Boiler Feedwater Pumps and Motors for the City of Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Award the contract to Stephens Mechanical Corp., in an amount not -to- exceed $350,000;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sig n the contract and any related documentation, and to execute change orders within the approved not-to-exceed amount; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve and sign contract amendments and change orders in an additional cumulative amount n ot- to-exceed $150,000, for a total project authorization not -to-exceed $500,000, to address improbable and unforeseeable repairs discovered after disassembly and inspection.
4.6(a). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the design, perm itting, engineering, and construction of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement Project:
(1) Approve ratification of a grant application for a Boat Launching Facilities Grant in the amount of $6,000,000, administered by the California Division of Boating and Waterways;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding as an applicant for a Boat Launching Facilities Grant; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, accept the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.
4.11(a). Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project, awarded to VSS International, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,541,486.85.
4.11(b). Authorize the City of Redding Water Utility to purchase a spare filter underdrain system for the Foothill Water Treatment Plant at a net cost of $238,898.30, including applicable taxes and delivery.
Redding City Council March 3, 2026
4.11(c). Accept the project plans, specificatio ns, and construction, of the sewer line associated with the Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement (C -9727) as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $3,053,466.78.
4.11(d). Approve the sole -source purchase of all City of Redding Rotamix Mix ing Systems and find that the name Rotamix in the specifications for maintenance and Public Works projects is authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2) in order to match other products in use by the City.
RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE, AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A court challenge to action taken by the City Council on any project or decision may be limited to only those issues raised during the public hearing or in written corr espondence delivered to the City Council during, or prior to, the public hearing.
Electric Utility
6.1. Public Hearing to consider Resolution approving City of Redding Electric Utility (REU) rate increases and increasing the Residential Energy Discount.
Recommendation:
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution to increase Redding Electric Utility’s rates (4.5 percent revenue increase per year) effective April 1, 2026, January 1, 2027, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2029, for usage beginning on the first day of the first electric billing cycle;
(2) Approve a Network Access Charge Credit increase of $21.00 per month to Residential Energy Discount Program customers effective April 1, 2026, $22.00 per month effective January 1, 2027, $23.00 per month effective January 1, 2028, and $24.00 per month effective January 1, 2029, for usage beginning on the first day of the first electric billing cycle; (3) Approve an Energy Discount increase to $0.05 86/kWh (37.50 percent) per month to Residential Energy Discount Program customers effective April 1, 2026, $0.0655/kWh (40.00 percent) per month effective January 1, 2027, $0.0732/kWh (42.50 percent) per month effective January 1, 2028, and $0.0816/kWh (45.00 percent) per month effective January 1, 2029, up to 450 kWh maximum, for usage beginning on the first day of the first electric billing cycle; and
(4) Find that the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under the common-sense clause.
Redding City Council March 3, 2026
9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNIC ATIONS OF DEPARTMENT S,
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
City Manager
9.1(a). Consider Uncodified Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 6.42 (Entertainment Zones) to add the Hilltop Entertainment Zone.
Recommendation:
Pursuant to City Council direction on February 17, 2026, staff presents the following options for Council consideration:
(1) Option A – Introduce Ordinance for Kool April Nites Cruise Event If the City Counc il desires to proceed with temporarily authorizing a Hilltop Drive Entertainment Zone for the Kool April Nites Cruise event on April 24, 2026, authorize and approve the following actions:
(a) Offer Uncodified Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 6 ( Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations) Chapter 6.42 (Entertainment Zone) by amending Section 6.42 for first reading by title only and waive the full reading;
(b) Authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance; and
(c) Find that the adoption of the ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act guidelines 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3) and further find that the passage of the ordinance will have no foreseeable direct or indirect physical change in the environment; or
(2) Option B – Provide Alternative Direction
Provide direction to staff and continue this item to a future meeting for further consideration and discussion for the event next year.
11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
Information Only
12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS
FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
13. ADJOURNMENT
Redding City Council March 3, 2026
Pursuant to the Brown Act, non -confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office o f the City Clerk, 3 rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.
City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:3 0 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: https://www.shastaartscouncil.org/scactv; and the City’s YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/cityofredding. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at https://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the Services tab, and select City Council Videos.
In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3 rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.
The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and re lated statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.
Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cy press Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution declaring April 2026 as Fair Housing Month in the City of Redding.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact by adopting the resolution.
Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to adopt a resolution declaring April as Fair Housing Month.
Background/Analysis
The City of Redding (City) has historically recognized April as Fair Housing Month. The City and Legal Services of Northern California, along with other Shasta Fair Housing Alliance partners, collaborate regarding educating the community about fair housing laws. The purpose of Fair Housing month is to bring awareness and e ducate citizens and landlords about their rights and responsibilities with respect to discrimination based on race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, physical disabilities, gender, age, and marital/familial status.
Since 2020, due to the advancement and availability of online meetings, Fair Housing training and information is provided to the community in an online format. The City continues to offer year-round edu cation materials to the community and staff is working with Legal Services of Northern California to co -host a workshop on -site in 2027 . Fair Housing rights and responsibilities can be found on the City’s website at:
www.cityofredding.gov/government/departments/housing/index.php
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)--Resolution Declaring April as Fair Housing Month Nicole Smith, Interim
Housing & Community
Development Director
Packet Pg. 6
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.2(a)--Resolution Declaring April as Fair Housing Month Page 2
In April 202 6, i nformational brochures and flyers with current regulations and online training options provided by the State of California Ci vil Rights Department will also be sent to interested parties.
Environmental Review
Declaring April as Fair Housing Month is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and requires no further action.
Under the National Envi ronmental Policy Act, administrative and management activities are considered exempt activities that require no further action.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21 st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make bet ter decisions today.”
Attachments
Resolution - Fair Housing Month April 2026
Packet Pg. 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DECLARING APRIL AS “FAIR HOUSING MONTH”
WHEREAS, Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act (Federal Housing Law) prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, leasing and financing of housing or land to be used for the construction of housing or in the provision of brokerage services because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, physical disabilities, gender, age, and marital/familial status; and
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Redding to implement programs to ensure equal opportunity in housing for all persons regardless of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, physical disabilities, gender, age, and marital/familial status; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding will assist all persons who feel they have been discriminated against because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, physical disabilities, gender, age, and marital/familial status to seek equity under federal and state laws by providing informational material and the necessary forms to file a complaint with the California Department of Fair Housing or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding annually distributes informationa l brochures and letters with current regulations to landlords and real estate agents to make them aware of their respective responsibilities and rights; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding, in conjunction with various federal, state, and local entities, has selected April as an opportunity to educate the community on its rights and responsibilities as tenants and landlords;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares April as “Fair Housing Month” in the City of Redding as part of the national effort to educate tenants and landlords on their rights and responsibilities under the Federal Fair Housing Law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of March, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Resolution - Fair Housing Month April 2026 (4.2(a)--Resolution Declaring April as Fair Housing Month)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions related to Request for Proposal Schedule No. 5650 – Overhaul of two Boiler Feedwater Pumps and Motors for the City of Redding Electric Utility:
(1) Award the contract to Stephens Mechanical Corp., in an amount not-to-exceed $350,000; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the contract and any related documentation, and to execute change orders within the approved not -to-exceed amount; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approv e and sign contract amendments and change orders in an additional cumulative amount not -to-exceed $150,000, for a total project authorization not -to-exceed $500,000, to address improbable and unforeseeable repairs discovered after disassembly and inspection.
Fiscal Impact
The total cost for Redding Power Plant overhaul of two Boiler Feedwater Pumps and Motors, including a contingency, is outlined below:
Description Estimated Cost
Base Overhaul Services $149,920
Potential Parts & Labor $142,000
Contingency $58,080
City Manager Contingency $150,000
TOTAL $500,000
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Feedwater Pumps and Motors
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 9
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Feedwater Pumps and Motors Page 2
The overhaul services contract is proposed at a not -to-exceed amount of $350,000, consisting of $149,920 for base overhaul services (firm, known costs), $142,000 for potential additional parts and labor (subject to findings during disassembly and inspection), and a project contingency of $58,080.
The City Manager or designee may authorize up to an additional $150,000 only if warranted by unforeseen conditions identified during the overhau l process, bringing the maximum project authorization to $500,000. This additional authorization is intended to manage risk associated with unknown repair conditions and would be utilized only as necessary.
Redding Electric Utility (REU) has budgeted $80 0,000 in Major Maintenance funds for this Fiscal Year 2025 -26 project; therefore, sufficient funding is available and no additional appropriation is required.
Alternative Action
The Council could direct staff to re-solicit the project or provide alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City of Redding (City) has two Siemens SGT-800 gas turbines, Units 5 & 6, in service at the Redding Power Plant. In keeping with the need to maintain the desired performance of this equipment, periodic major overhauls and maintenance operations are required.
Generating Unit 5 provides approximately 45 megawatts (MW) of power and uses waste heat recovery to produce an additional 15 MW of steam power with Generating Unit 4. Together, the units generate 60 MW, represen ting roughly 30 percent of the Redding Power Plant’s 185 -MW total capacity. As such, Generating Unit 5 is a critical resource within REU’s power portfolio.
The boiler feed pumps are essential to the reliable operation of Generating Unit 5 and control the flow of water in the steam system. The boiler feed pumps are both due for reliability overhauls as neither pump has been overhauled since installation in 2002. Proactively overhauling the pumps before failure occurs will help ensure continued reliability o f the generating unit and reduce the likelihood of an unplanned outage. This preemptive maintenance strategy also supports stable energy prices for REU customers by avoiding costly emergency repairs, reducing market exposure during forced outages, and main taining steady generation availability. Overhauling the boiler feed pumps will strengthen operational stability, preserve reliability, and mitigate the risk of a complete unit shutdown.
The City issued a public Request for Proposals (RFP) to obtain a qual ified firm to perform the off-site overhaul of two boiler feedwater pumps and motors. Eight firms known to provide this specialized service and possessing appropriate qualifications were directly solicited. The RFP was also advertised in the local newspape r, posted on the City’s website, and distributed to multiple builders’ exchanges. On November 24, 2025, the City received proposals from three firms. A panel of City staff, including engineering and maintenance personnel, conducted a detailed evaluation of the proposals in accordance with the RFP’s published criteria. Based on that evaluation, Stephens Mechanical Corp ranked highest overall and was identified as the proposer most advantageous to the City.
Packet Pg. 10
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Feedwater Pumps and Motors Page 3
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp
Packet Pg. 11
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Contract re: RFP 5650 Award Stephens Mechanical Corp (4.5(a)--Award of RFP Schedule No. 5650 - Overhaul of Two (2) Boiler
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the design, permitting, engineering, and construction of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Improvement Project:
(1) Approve ratification of a grant application for a Boat Launching Facilities Grant in the amount of $6,000,000, administered by the California Division of Boating and Waterways;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding as an applicant for a Boat Launching Facilities Grant; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, accept the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.
Fiscal Impact
The grant application requests $6,000,000 for improvements to the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp. There is no match required for the grant. If awarded, the grant will address maintenance items that would otherwise impact the General Fund in the future. The full project cost of $6,000,000 is anticipated to be covered by the grant. However, should additional funds be required, staff would seek out additional grants or partnerships to complete the project.
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to ratify the grant application or provide staff with an alternative direction.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services/Airports
Packet Pg. 41
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Page 2
Background/Analysis
Originally built in 1969, the single -lane Turtle Bay boat ramp, located behind the Civic Auditorium and the Redding Rodeo Grounds, is a popular launch point for fishing and non - motorized recreational watercraft on the Sacramento River. Boating activity in Redding has seen a steady rise, and this stretch of the river has enjoyed international recognition as a world -class fly-fishing experience. The narrow launch space allows only one boat to launch at a time, leading to long wait times and congestion. Additionally, the only available restroom at that location is small, in poor condition, and does not meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.
To address these issues, staff worked with the California Department of Fish an d Wildlife (CDFW), Shasta Trinity Fly Fishers, Trout Unlimited, Shasta Living Streets, Redding Parks and Trails Foundation, Turtle Bay, Redding Rodeo Association, and the Redding Civic management team to fund and develop a conceptual plan that dramatically increases the ramp’s ability to meet the demand for both motorized and non -motorized users. The plan was funded through a $311,000 Wildlife Conservation Board grant and was completed in 2025.
To fund the shovel-ready project, staff applied for the Boat L aunching Facilities Program (BLF) through the California Division of Boating and Waterways, which provides local assistance grant funding to public agencies for the construction or improvement of boat launching facilities. The application was submitted on February 2, 2026, and due to the tight turnaround and review times for the Resolution, staff is now seeking ratification of the application.
BLF grants are for the construction or improvement of boat launching ramps, restrooms, parking for vehicles and b oat trailers, utilities, and ancillary items. The purpose of the program is to provide and improve access to California’s waterways for the recreational boating public that use trailer-able motorized watercraft. The improvements planned for and designed wi th (BLF) funding include:
• A widened and resurfaced two-lane ramp with V-grooves to provide traction; • A drift boat, raft, and kayak beach;
• Extension of the floating dock to accommodate more motorized boats; • Demolishing the existing restroom and constructing a new ADA compliant restroom; • Expanding the parking lot and improving vehicle circulation; • Removal of the existing non -motorized launch at Riverfront Park to protect the Redding Riffle’s salmon habitat;
• New riverfront trail and picnic amenities;
• Lighting and security improvements; and
• Landscaping/shade trees.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On April 4, 2023 , Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project, thereby satisfying the requirements of CEQA (CEQA Guidelines §15074) and no further information is required.
Packet Pg. 42
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023
Packet Pg. 43
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPROVING FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL SUPPORT
FOR TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP
WHEREAS, the City of Redding has the authority to construct, operate, and maintain the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding is requesting a $6,000,000 grant/loan from the Department of Boating and Waterways; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding desires to enhance, repair, or rebuild and protect the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp to meet the needs of watercraft users and provide other public amenities to those utilizing the facility;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT:
1. Pursuant and subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Harbor and Watercraft Revolving Fund program, application be made by the City of Redding to the State of California, Department of Boating and Waterways for funding.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause the necessary data to be prepared and application to be signed and filed with the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City Redding on the 3 rd day of March, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Resolution (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following actions relative to the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (Attachment C);
(2) Approve the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Proj ect as described, and find it satisfies the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines §15074; and (3) Direct Staff to return to City Council , once necessary permits are obtained, for further direction relative to proceeding with the project.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of approving the project and adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP).
The City of Redding (City) received $311, 000 in grant funding from the Wildlife Conservation Board’s Public Access Grant Program for the planning, design , and permitting of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project ( project). As matching funds, the City appropriated $30,000 from the Park Development Fund for a total project budget of $341,000. The City will seek grant funding for the construction phase of the project.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the MND and the MMP and not approve the project as described. The project could not proceed without the approval of these documents, as, in that case, it would not compl y with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
MEETING DATE: April 4, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.6(a)--Consider approval of the City of Redding Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project.
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Report to Redding City Council March 30, 2023
Re: 9.6(a)--Approval of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 2
Background/Analysis
The Turtle Bay Boat Launch Facility an d floating dock were originally built in 1969 and improved in 2005 with a new floating dock and expanded parking with 25 pull -through boat trailer stalls. In the last decade, boating activity in Redding has seen a steady rise, and this stretch of the river provides a world -class fly-fishing experience. With the Sacramento River drawing local, regional, and international visitors, the City’s use data indicates the ramp’s popularity has contributed to an over-capacity condition, as the narrow launch ramp does not allow two boats to efficiently launch at one time. The existing facility lacks capacity, a designated area to launch drift boats, and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant restroom.
The proposed project would include a widened, two -lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock, and a new boating access beach adjacent to the ramp for drift boats and non - motorized vessel launching. The project would also include: additional boat trailer parking stalls, an ADA -compliant restroo m, drinking fountain, wastewater line extension and replacement, extension of the Sacramento River Trail and bike paths through the site, storm water and irrigated landscape improvements, and an ADA access ramp to the new beach. Adjacent to the trail will be a small overlook area with picnic tables.
If ultimately approved, the work would include earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage and utility modification, tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, gates, fencing, security systems, and sign installation. Funding limitations may require some project amenities to be phased.
An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the CEQA. It describes why the project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed project could have a significant effect on biological resources, but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The mitigation measures and conservation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre -construction surveys, in - water work windows, water quality monitoring, impact minimization, exclusionary fencing, and erosion control.
Based on the conclusions made in the IS, a n MND was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there will be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project. In addition, a n MMP has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City staff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure ef fective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.
The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day public review period and distribution to pertinent State agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and posted in the local newspaper. Four comment letter s were received during the public review period. Approval of the project and associated MND and MMP will allow staff to move toward final design.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Report to Redding City Council March 30, 2023
Re: 9.6(a)--Approval of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
Environmental Review
The City of Redding is the lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the Council is authorized to adopt the MND per Redding Municipal Code Section §18.24.070.E and State law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk’s Office and the State Clearinghouse, thereby completing the environmental review process. The IS/MND is available in the Public Works Department and is currently available online at https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/environmental-management.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Location Map
^TB Boat Ramp - Rodeo lease exhibit
MND_IS_MMP for Turtle Bay Ramp Project
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 1
March 2023
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020064)
SUBJECT
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Redding Community Services Department (City) is proposing the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project. The existing facility lacks capacity, a designated area to launch drift boats, and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant restroom. The proposed Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (project) would include a widened, two-lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock, and a new boating access beach adjacent the ramp for drift boats and non-motorized vessel launching. The project would also include additional boat trailer parking stalls, an ADA-compliant restroom, drinking fountain, wastewater line extension and replacement, extension of the Sacramento River Trail and bike paths through the site, storm water and irrigated landscape improvements, and an ADA access ramp to the new beach. Adjacent to the trail there will be a small overlook area with picnic tables.
Work involves earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage and utility modification, tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, gates, fencing, security systems, and sign installation. Construction of the project is anticipated to take approximately 10 months. Staging of equipment and materials would be within the project boundaries. A narrow sliver of adjacent property would need to be acquired for the project, and construction is anticipated to occur in 2025. Construction may occur earlier if all approvals are obtained and funding is available; however, funding limitations may require some project amenities to be phased.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project area is bounded by the Sacramento River to the north, Sundial Bridge and Turtle Bay Exploration Park to the east, Redding Memorial Park to the west, and the rodeo grounds and associated parking to the south. The project area primarily consists of two parking lots; a graded and graveled one to the east (Figure 3), and a paved western lot that serves that boat ramp. The two lots are connected by Aoki Way, a paved road. There is a fenced dirt area south of Aoki Way, which is part of the rodeo grounds.
The boat ramp is an excavated ramp sloping down to the Sacramento River. A riparian corridor and forested hilly terrain exists along the Sacramento River and towards the western extent of the project area.
FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached) that determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects on biological resources. Implementation of specific mitigation measures identified below will avoid or mitigate the potentially significant environmental effects identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. If there are
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigated Negative Declaration
March 2023
substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary.
Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures that it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure(s) is(are) equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.
1) Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2) The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding.
DOCUMENTATION
The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination.
MITIGATION MEASURES
The following mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project to minimize potential effects on biological resources:
MM-1. All in-water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
MM-2. Prior to any in-water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur. Prior to completion of the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in-water portion of the project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
MM-3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river channel).
MM-4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of ¾-inch minus, silt free, clean, spawning-grade gravel that meets Caltrans’ cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of 85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Works Department, Engineering Division Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
March 2023
MM-5. Twenty-four hours (24-hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal within 50-feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas), a qualified biologist shall perform a pre-construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and foothill yellow-legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow-legged frog are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified. Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat outside of the construction impact zone.
MM-6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre- construction survey to locate active nests. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.
MM-7. Removal of large trees (10-inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15). If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March 1 through August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the project area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of construction activities.
If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between those dates, another pre- construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest.
PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to:
State Clearinghouse
Shasta County Clerk
California Department of Transportation District 2
California Department of Fish and Wildlife District 1 California State Lands Commission
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board –Region 5 (Redding) California Highway Patrol
Native American Heritage Commission
State Office of Historic Preservation
All property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) &LW\RI5HGGLQJ
3XEOLF:RUNV'HSDUWPHQW(QJLQHHULQJ'LYLVLRQ 0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLY H'HFODUDWLRQ 3DJH 7XUWOH%D\%RDW5DPS3URMHFW
0DUFK
38%/,&5(9,(:
;
'UDIWGRFXPHQWUHIHUUHGIRUFRPPHQWV ± ' D W H
1RFRPPHQWVZHUHUHFHLYHGGXULQJWKHSXEOLFUHYLHZSHULRG
&RPPHQWVZHUHUHFHLYHGEXWGLGQRWDGGUHVVWKHGUDIW0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQILQGLQJVRU WKHDFFXUDF\FRPSOHWHQHVVRIWKH,QLWLDO6WXG\1RUHVSRQVHLVQHFHVVDU\7KHOHWWHUVDUHDWWDFKHG
;
&RPPHQWVDGGUHVVLQJWKHILQGLQJVRIWKHGUDIW0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQDQGRUDFFXUDF\RU FRPSOHWHQHVVRIWKH,QLWLDO6WXG\ZHUHUHFHLYHGGXULQJWKHSXEO LFUHYLHZSHULRG7KHOHWWHUVDQG UHVSRQVHVIROORZ
VHH$WWDFKPHQW'5HVSRQVHWR&RPPHQWV
&RSLHVRIWKH0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQWKH,QLWLDO6WXG\GRFXPHQWDWLRQPDWHULDOVDQGWKH 0LWLJDWLRQ0RQLWRULQJ3URJUDPPD\EHREWDLQHGDWWKH3XEOLF:RUNV'HSDUWPHQW(QJLQHHULQJ 'LYLVLRQ&LW\RI5HGGLQJ&\SUHVV$YHQXH5HGGLQJ&$ &RQWDFW
$PEHU.HOOH\
(QYLURQPHQWDO&RPSOLDQFH0DQDJHU
RUDNHOOH\#FLW\RIUHGGLQJRUJ
'DWHRI
'UDIW5HSRUW
)HEUXDU\ %\
1DPH7LWOH
$PEHU.HOOH\
(QYLURQPHQWDO&RPSOLDQFH0DQDJHU
'DWHRI
)LQDO5HSRUW
0DUFK
$WWDFKPHQWV
$ 9LFLQLW\0DS
% ,QLWLDO6WXG\
& 0LWLJDWLRQ0RQLWRULQJDQG(QYLURQPHQWDO&RPPLWPHQW3URJUDP ' &RPPHQWVDQG5HVSRQVHWR&RPPHQWV
LIDQ\
Amber Kelley
Digitally signed by Amber Kelley
DN: cn=Amber Kelley, o=City of Redding,
ou=Public Works, Engineering,
[email protected], c=US
Date: 2023.03.06 16:31:13 -08'00'
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
ATTACHMENT A
Vicinity Map
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
ATTACHMENT B
Initial Study
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
INITIAL STUDY
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
State Clearinghouse No. 2023020064
Prepared by:
CITY OF REDDING
Public Works Department
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, California 96001
March 2023
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
March 2023
CITY OF REDDING
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title: Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (proposed project)
2. Lead agency name and address:
CITY OF REDDING
Public Works Department
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Amber Kelley, Environmental Compliance Manager, (530) 225-4046
4. Project Location:
The proposed project is in central Redding, Shasta County, California. The Project is at the Turtle Bay Boat Launch located at 720 Auditorium Drive, Redding, CA 96001, in the Redding, California, 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle in Township 32N, Range 05W, Section 36 (40.59057, -122.38293). The Boat Launch is approximately 0.30 miles west of the Turtle Bay Exploration Park.
5. Applicant’s Name and Address: Representative’s Name and Address:
Travis Menne Amber Kelley
City of Redding City of Redding
Community Services Department Public Works Department
777 Cypress Avenue 777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001 Redding, CA 96001
6. General Plan Designation:
Public Facility (PF)
7. Zoning:
Public Facility – Specific Plan Overlay District (PF-SP)
8. Description of Project:
The Turtle Bay Boat Launch Facility boat ramp and floating dock were originally built in 1969 as a launch point for fishing and non-motorized recreational watercraft on the Sacramento River.
The boat launch site currently covers approximately 59,720 square feet (sf) (1.37 acres [ac]) and currently includes a single-lane boat ramp, boat access dock, public restroom, parking stalls, and area lighting. In 2004/2005, the facility was upgraded with a new floating dock and expanded parking with 25 pull-through boat trailer stalls. In the last decade, boating activity in Redding has
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
seen a steady rise, and this stretch of the river provides a world-class fly-fishing experience. With the Sacramento River drawing local, regional, and international visitors, the City’s use data indicates the ramp’s popularity has contributed to an over-capacity condition, as the narrow launch ramp does not allow two boats to efficiently launch at one time.
According to the City, users of the facility have expressed concern for the lack of capacity and the floating dock’s inadequacy for use by drift boats, which are extremely common in the river. In addition, the original on-site restroom does not have the capacity to serve the heavy use of the prime fly-fishing season nor is it compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. The City’s Community Services Department is proposing to improve the existing Turtle Bay Boat Launch Facility to increase the capacity of recreational boating offerings to meet demand.
The proposed Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (project) would include a widened, two-lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock, and a new boating access beach adjacent the ramp for drift boats and non-motorized vessel launching. The project would also include additional boat trailer parking stalls, an ADA-compliant restroom, wastewater line extension and replacement, extension of the Sacramento River Trail and bike paths through the site, storm water and irrigated landscape improvements, and an ADA access ramp to the new beach. Adjacent to the trail there will be a small overlook area with picnic tables. Work involves earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage and utility modification, tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, gates, fencing, security systems, and sign installation.
The existing boat ramp would be resurfaced with a pre-cast concrete V-groove finish to improve traction and safety among users and widened by approximately 3-feet to include two 15-feet wide lanes. The proposed extended portion of the boat ramp is approximately 3-feet wide by 34-feet in length.
The existing floating dock located on the eastern side of the boat ramp would be extended with an additional section. An additional pile would be installed to hold the new extended dock section in place. The proposed extended section is approximately 8.5-feet wide and 24-feet long, and the new piling would be approximately 10.75 inches in diameter. The single piling would be installed using a “cast-in-drilled-hole pile” method, or vibrationally pushed in via an excavator.
The proposed drift boat beach area is in an area of low-lying riverbank located west of the existing boat ramp. Grading of the drift boat beach area would occur below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), and would amount to disturbance of approximately 2,500 square feet.
Approximately 185 cubic yards of fill would be excavated and removed from the drift boat beach.
This material would be hauled to a nearby landfill. Geogrid fabric (or similar) would be incorporated into the drift boat beach area and would be revegetated with grass. Higher elevation wooded terrain occurs adjacent to the proposed drift boat beach area. A retaining wall would be constructed within the elevated bank west of the existing boat ramp to create the drift boat beach area. The retaining wall would require up to 65 piles to be inserted along the eastern and northern margins of the drift boat beach area. Piles would be installed using a “cast-in-drilled-hole pile” method. It is likely that each pile would be spaced five to six feet from the other and would be pushed 16 feet below surface and remain 8 feet above surface. Pile driving would not occur.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
March 2023
To construct the in-water project elements equipment would utilize the existing concrete boat ramp to reach work areas. However, if the equipment cannot reach work areas from the concrete boat ramp, then a temporary gravel working pad would be constructed to enable equipment access.
Prior to in-water work, seine netting of the boat launch inlet area would be conducted by qualified biologists to clear fish out of the work area. The biologists would walk into the water holding a large net and gently encourage the fish out of the work area. A gravel berm would then be constructed in a semi-circle, at the mouth of the boat launch inlet, out of silt-free spawning grade gravel to exclude fish from the work area and to provide sediment control for the project. The berm would be approximately 150 feet long and 8 feet wide at the base. The berm would be constructed using an excavator operated on the existing concrete boat ramp (as feasible) or from the proposed drift boat beach area. Prior to completion of the gravel berm, a section of the gravel berm would be intentionally left unfinished and seine netting would be conducted again to ensure fish are not trapped within the work area. The unfinished portion of the gravel berm would be filled in with gravel and completed following seine netting, resulting in a work area free of fish.
No fish would be handled during this process.
After the gravel berm is constructed, a temporary gravel work pad would be constructed within the work area to enable an excavator to reach areas inaccessible from the existing boat ramp or drift boat beach area. The temporary gravel work pad would also be constructed out of clean, silt- free spawning grade gravel and would be approximately 18-feet wide. The gravel berm and gravel work pad would remain in place for the minimum time required to complete the in-water work.
Following construction and once sediment from construction activities has settled, the gravel berm would be breached using the bucket of the excavator, and the gravel berm and gravel work pad would remain to be washed downstream during future high-water flows. Some of the gravel may be moved further into the Sacramento River to enable a boating access pathway from the boat ramp, floating dock, and drift boat beach area. The gravel (to be washed downstream) would act as an enhancement to salmon spawning habitat.
An existing natural kayak launch, approximately 500 feet downstream, would be decommissioned to protect salmonid redds. The area would be planted with native vegetation and boulders (or some other barrier) may be used to prevent access. The new drift boat beach would replace the existing kayak launch.
The existing parking lot would be expanded to the east, and in total the entire parking lot would include storm water and landscaping improvements, new area lighting, 40 pull-through boat trailer stalls and 5 standard parking stalls. Two of the pull-through stalls and one of the standard stalls would be ADA accessible. The area of proposed parking lot expansion to the east includes 23,515 square feet (0.54 ac) of previously disturbed graveled area adjacent to the existing parking lot. The expanded parking lot would be resurfaced with pavement to match the existing parking lot.
An ADA-accessible pathway is proposed between the ADA parking stalls and the beginning of the boat launch and drift boat beach area, and a shaded fish cleaning station may be installed. The
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Sacramento River Trail is proposed to be extended through the project site to increase access opportunities for users including cyclist and pedestrians. A new four-unit ADA accessible restroom is proposed and will likely be located southwest of the boat ramp.
Higher elevation wooded terrain occurs adjacent to the proposed drift boat beach area. A retaining wall would be constructed within the elevated bank west of the existing boat ramp to create the drift boat beach area. The retaining wall would require up to 65 piles to be inserted along the eastern and northern margins of the drift boat beach area. Piles would be installed using a “cast-in-drilled-hole pile” approach, which typically includes drilling 36-inch diameter holes into the soil, followed by placement of the piles and filling the hole in the pile with concrete. It is likely that each pile would be spaced five to six feet from the other and would be pushed 16 feet below surface and remain 8 feet above surface. Pile driving would not occur. Geogrid fabric (or similar) would be incorporated into the drift boat beach area and would be revegetated with grass.
Construction of the project is anticipated to take approximately 10 months. Staging of equipment and materials would be within the project boundaries. A narrow sliver of adjacent property would need to be acquired for the project, and construction is anticipated to occur in 2025. Construction may occur earlier if all approvals are obtained and funding is available; however, funding limitations may require some project amenities to be phased.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The project area is located on what was historically low-lying, gravelly, alluvial land, bordered along the west by a river terrace. The terrace is about 30 feet above the project area. The terrain in the project area is flat with elevations generally between 490 and 500 feet above sea level.
The project area is bounded by the Sacramento River to the north, Sundial Bridge and Turtle Bay Exploration Park to the east, Redding Memorial Park to the west, and the rodeo grounds and associated parking to the south. The project area primarily consists of two parking lots; a graded and graveled one to the east (Figure 3), and a paved western lot that serves that boat ramp. The two lots are connected by Aoki Way, a paved road. There is a fenced dirt area south of Aoki Way, which is part of the rodeo grounds. The boat ramp is an excavated ramp sloping down to the Sacramento River. A riparian corridor and forested hilly terrain exists along the Sacramento River and towards the western extent of the project area.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
National Marine Fisheries Service
State Office of Historic Preservation
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
State Lands Commission
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
March 2023
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
The City consulted with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and local Native American groups and individuals pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3. This consultation included contacting the local Native American individuals identified by the NAHC via letters, emails, and follow-up phone calls. Two local Native American tribes responded, and consultation is ongoing. Additionally, NAHC conducted a review of its Sacred Lands database for culturally significant properties and indicated that the results were negative.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” or “Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agricultural and
Forestry Resources Air Quality
X Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water
Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities/Service
Systems Wildfire X Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY)
Based on the initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
March 2023
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include:
Aesthetics
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Energy
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use/Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population/Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems
Wildfire
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Th
e environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the State of California’s CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of Redding in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to analyze the development’s impacts more fully and to identify mitigation.
For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responses:
No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment.
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the environment although this impact will be below established thresholds that are significant. Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The development will have the potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment; however, mitigation measures or changes to the development’s physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. Potentially Significant Impact. The development will have impacts which are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less-than-significant levels.
Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 9
February 2023
Prior environmental evaluations applicable to all or part of the project site:
City of Redding General Plan, 2000
City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2000, SCH #1998072103 List of Attachments/References
Appendix A: Figure 1
Appendix B: Biological Resources Report, GHD Consulting 2022* Appendix C: Biological Assessment, GHD Consulting 2022* Appendix D: Technical Memorandum, GHD Consulting 2022*
Appendix E: Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, GHD 2022* Appendix E: Archaeological Resources Study, Anthropological Studies Center, Sonoma State University 2022*
* Appe
ndices are on file in the Public Works Department – Engineering Division
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
I. AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views
the site and its surroundings (public views are
those that are experience from publicly accessible
vantage point).? If the project is in an urbanized
area, would the project conflict with applicable
zoning and other regulations governing scenic
quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Discussion
a) During the construction period, construction workers, vehicles, and equipment, including heavy machinery, would be present and visible to recreational visitors in the area. Construction activities involves earthwork, grading, new structures, drainage modification, utility modification tree removal, tree planting, paving, lighting, striping, and sign installation. Once construction is completed, the project area would be restored to pre-project conditions. The proposed project would not represent a significant change to scenic vistas or the overall scenic quality of the area. The impact would be less than significant. b) The proposed project is not located within, or adjacent to, a state-designated scenic highway (California Department of Transportation 2022) and would, therefore, have no impacts. c) The proposed project would be compatible with the existing visual character of the property and its surroundings. Project components would be consistent with the surrounding visual environment, which has been subjected to urban development and recreational open space uses.
Further, construction staging areas would be temporary. The proposed project would not conflict with the City’s goal to maintain a “proper balance between development areas and the natural environment” (City of Redding 2009); therefore, impacts of the proposed project on the existing visual character and quality of existing views would be less than significant. d) Construction of the proposed project may involve the use of temporary safety and security lighting in staging areas. Temporary construction lighting will comply with the City’s Zoning
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 11
February 2023
Ordinance light standards that require light shielding (City of Redding 2019). Project lighting would be consistent with existing lighting sources used on area roads and trails. The lights will produce light at 1.0 lux or less and will be shielded, directing light only to areas of intended illumination. Potential glare from reflective signage, pavement striping, and trail surfaces would be similar to levels emitted by existing parking areas and trails. Construction equipment, machinery, and bright colored traffic control signage may temporarily increase light and glare in the project area during construction. Operational and construction impacts on day or nighttime views in the area because of project lighting would be less than significant.
Documentation
California Department of Transportation. 2022. California Scenic Highway Mapping System – Shasta County. Available at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/ .
City of Redding. 2019. Municipal Code – Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.40.090. City of Redding. 2009. General Plan – Community Development and Design Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural, Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Mode (1997) prepared
by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s
inventory of forest land, including the Forest and
Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement
methodology provided bin Forest Protocols adopted by
the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act Contract?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural, Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Mode (1997) prepared
by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s
inventory of forest land, including the Forest and
Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement
methodology provided bin Forest Protocols adopted by
the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code section 4526),
or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result
in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use
or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Discussion
a-e) The project area does not include any designated farmland or timberlands. According to the California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, no lands within the project area are under Williamson Act contracts and no lands are mapped as “Important Farmlands.” The proposed project would not convert any farmland to non- agricultural use, or any forestland to non-forest use; therefore, there would be no impact.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan – Natural Resources Element. City of Redding. 2022. GIS Parcel and Zoning Map Viewer. California Department of Conservation. 2018. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Shasta County Important Farmland.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 13
February 2023
III. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established
by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make
the following determinations. Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
Discussion
a,b) City standards implemented through the Grading Ordinance and Uniform Building Code require implementation of conservation measures and best management practices (BMPs) that contribute to achieving the City’s goal of at least a 20% reduction in emissions or the best reduction otherwise feasible. The following standard conservation measures and BMPs will be used during construction to limit dust and particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10) emissions:
AQ-1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer’s specification to all inactive construction areas.
AQ- 2.
All grading operations shall be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.
AQ-3. Water all stockpiles, access roads, and disturbed or exposed areas, as necessary, to prevent airborne dust.
AQ-4. Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code (Section 23114(e)(4)) (California Legislative Information 2016), all trucks hauling soil and other loose material to and from the construction site shall be covered or shall maintain at least 6 inches of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of load and the trailer). AQ-
5. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Shasta County, including the far northern Sacramento Valley, currently exceeds the state's ambient standards for ozone (smog) (CARB 2020). Consequently, these pollutants are the focus of local air quality policy, especially when related to land use and transportation planning. Even with application of measures to reduce emissions for individual projects, cumulative impacts are unavoidable when ozone emissions are involved. For example, the primary source of emissions contributing to ozone is from vehicles. Any project that generates vehicle trips has the potential to incrementally contribute to the problem. The Environmental Impact Report for the City’s General Plan acknowledged this dilemma; and as a result, the City Council adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for impacts on air quality resulting from growth supported under the General Plan (City of Redding 2009).
Construction equipment would result in limited temporary emissions of Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), which are ozone precursors, and inhalable PM
10. The proposed project would be under construction for approximately 10 months. Because the proposed project is a recreational project with a relatively small footprint requiring limited construction activities and equipment for its construction, it would be classified as a minor project in accordance with the City’s General Plan findings. The adherence to standards and BMPs set forth by the City further illustrates the size and scope of construction activities that would result in unmitigated emissions less than the 25 pounds per day of NOx, 25 pounds per day of ROG, and 80 pounds per day of PM
10 Level "A" mitigation thresholds identified as part
of the City’s General Plan. The proposed project would be consistent with the City’s emission- reduction goals of 20 to 25% established in the Air Quality Element of the General Plan.
The proposed project would have no impact on air quality plans or policies. The proposed project’s cumulative contribution to criteria pollutants in a non-attainment area would be less than significant with the use of the conservation measures and BMPs (AQ-1 through AQ-6) previously described).
c,d) C onstruction vehicles would generate fugitive dust and diesel exhaust emissions. There are approximately 40 residences that would be adjacent to construction activities with several that could be as close as 100 feet from the construction area. Additionally, recreational users at Cascade Park could be considered sensitive receptors; however, these receptors would have limited exposure since use of the park occurs in intermittent phases (rather than prolonged exposure). Impacts on the neighboring residents as well as park users because of construction emissions would be temporary, localized, and minor. Construction activities would occur in a linear nature, and no sensitive receptors would be substantially affected for prolonged periods of time. Adherence with City specifications outlined in BMPs AQ-1 through AQ-6 would further reduce overall emissions exposure to residents and park users. No operational emissions, including odor, would result from the proposed project. There are no other sensitive receptors (e.g., hospitals, schools) in the immediate project vicinity. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Documentation
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. Area Designation Maps/State and National.
Accessed at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm
. June.
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan, Air Quality Element.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 15
February 2023
City of Redding. 2000. CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the City of Redding General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, as adopted by the Redding City Council on October 3, 2000, by Resolution 2000-166. Shasta County Air Quality Management District. 2003. Protocol for Review, Land Use Permitting Activities, Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. November.
Shasta County Air Quality Management District. 2003. Environmental Review Guidelines, Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. November.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community,
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or State habitat conservation plan?
Discussion
a) A Biological Resources Report (GHD 2022), including a summary of findings for the protocol- level botanical survey, a habitat assessment survey for VELB, a biological reconnaissance survey, and delineation of waters of the United States, was prepared to assess the impacts of the proposed project on biological resources in the project area and vicinity.
Special-status Plants
Based on database and information review, habitat for numerous special-status plant species, including one federally listed species, one state listed species, and one state candidate species have the potential to occur in the project vicinity. Each plant species was reviewed in relation to the habitat conditions in the project area, and the following three species were found to have a moderate to high potential to occur in the project area. Silky cryptantha (Cryptantha crinita)
Shasta snow-wreath (Neviusia cliftonii)
Maverick clover (Trifolium piorkowskii)
Tw
o seasonally appropriate floristic surveys were conducted on May 11 and July 6, 2022, and no special-status plants were found to occur within the project area (GHD 2022); therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not impact special-status plant species.
Special Status Fish and Mollusks
The following federal and state listed fish species have a moderate to high potential to occur in or adjacent to the project area:
Green Sturgeon, Southern DPS (Acipenser medirostris)
Steelhead - Central Valley DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 11) Chinook Salmon - Central Valley spring-run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha pop. 6) Chinook Salmon - Sacramento River winter-run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha pop. 7)
Western Pearlshell (Margaritifera falcate)
The proposed project is within and adjacent to the Sacramento River, which provides spawning and juvenile rearing habitat for special-status fish and mollusks. The project area is within
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 17
February 2023
designated critical habitat for all of the above listed fish species. In addition, Essential Fish Habitat exists within the Action Area for Chinook Salmon.
Green Sturgeon are known to spawn in the Sacramento River. This species has been recorded downstream of the Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District Diversion Dam. Large numbers of this species have been recorded in recent years in Red Bluff; there are no fish passage barriers between Red Bluff and the Project Area. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project Area and BSA. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a high potential to be present, spawn, and forage in the Project Area and BSA, though presence is likely to be seasonal (associated with upstream migration and spawning).
Steelhead have been recorded in the Sacramento River adjacent to the Project Area as recently as 2010. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project Area and BSA. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a high potential to be present, spawn, and forage in the Project Area and BSA, though presence is likely to be seasonal (associated with upstream migration and spawning).
Chinook Salmon have been recorded in Sacramento River adjacent to the Project Area as recently as 1995. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project Area and BSA. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a high potential to be present, spawn, and forage in the Project Area and BSA, though presence is likely to be seasonal (associated with upstream migration and spawning).
The Western Pearlshell is an aquatic freshwater mussel. Its geographic distribution spans the western U.S. including Alaska, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. The mussel tends to prefer low velocity water. This species is primarily threatened by water diversion, pollution, and siltation (NatureServe 2022). Western Pearlshells have been recorded in the Sacramento River adjacent to the Project Area as recently as 2008. Suitable aquatic habitat exists in the Sacramento River within the Project Area and BSA.
A Biological Assessment (BA) was prepared to assess the potential for the proposed project to impact listed fish (GHD 2022). Potential impacts on listed salmonids and sturgeon caused by construction activities include, but are not limited to, spills and discharges of hazardous materials, mainly fuels, lubricants, and uncured concrete from construction activities; introduction of invasive species; removal of riparian vegetation and bank disturbances. Impacts to special status fish and mollusks in the project area may include injury or mortality as a result of construction of the gravel berm, exclusion via seine netting, or increased levels of in-water sedimentation.
Installation of the gravel berm could adversely affect fish due to the placement of gravel, however with inclusion of mitigation measures, the area would be seined prior to gravel berm construction, and equipment operators would utilize methods to alert fish of forthcoming movement to encourage fish to move out of the work area prior to placement of gravel.
Installation of the gravel berm would result in an isolated, fish-free work area. The seining method will involve two (or more) biologists slowly walking a long net, from the shore to the berm location. The fish would be encouraged to swim away from the net and out of the work
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
area without capture. No handling of ESA or CESA listed species would occur during construction of the gravel berm or in association with the project, and informal consultation with NMFS under the ESA is anticipated. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
The BA findings conclude that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Central Valley spring-run ESU Chinook salmon, Sacramento River winter-run ESU Chinook salmon, and Central Valley DPS steelhead, and southern DPS green sturgeon. The findings also conclude that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, and would not destroy or modify, designated critical habitat for the four listed species.
Additionally, it is determined that Essential Fish Habitat exists within the Action Area for Chinook Salmon (NOAA 2022); however, no Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) occur within the Action Area (NOAA 2022).
Mitigation Measures MM-1 through MM-4 will be implemented to avoid or minimize impacts on special-status fish and/or their habitat during construction. With implementation of the measures, impacts on listed fish would be less than significant. In addition, standard conservation measures and BMPs HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, WQ-1 through WQ-3, and BIO-1 through BIO-3 are incorporated into all projects that require earthwork and work near streams.
BIO-1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), as required by the City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, will be prepared to address BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss within the project site. BMPs such as silt fence, mulching and seeding, and straw wattles will be placed where needed to prevent sediment from leaving the site during and after construction.
BIO-2. Appropriate sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) shall be in place prior to the onset of construction activities near waters of the United States and in project areas where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into waters of the United States. Sediment control measures shall be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.
BIO-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near jurisdictional waters and riparian areas to prevent unauthorized access.
Spec
ial-status Wildlife
The following special status wildlife species have the potential to occur in or adjacent to the project area:
Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) - federally listed as threatened.
Western pond turtle (Emys marmorata) - state species of special concern. Foothill Yellow-legged Frog (Rany boylii) – state species of special concern. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) - federally delisted, state listed as endangered, state listed as fully protected.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 19
February 2023
Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) - state watch list.
Great Egret (Ardea alba) – CA Dept. of Forestry, sensitive. Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) – state threatened.
Silver-haired bat (Antrozous pallidus) – IUNC, least concern Hoary bat (Lasiurus blossevilla) – IUNC, least concern Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (VELB). Suitable habitat for the VELB is present adjacent to the project area. Two elderberry shrubs were observed adjacent to the project boundary. The northern elderberry shrub is approximately 75-feet from the project’s disturbance boundary, and the southern elderberry shrub is approximately 50-feet from the project’s disturbance boundary. The northern elderberry shrub exhibited VELB exit holes, however no VELB exit holes were observed in the southern elderberry shrub.
The proposed project does not include the removal or modification of the elderberry shrubs.
Equipment would remain within the disturbance boundary, therefore project activities and/or equipment would be at least 75-feet and 50-feet from the northern and southern elderberry shrubs, respectively, at all times. No vegetation within 110-feet of the northern and southern elderberry shrubs, respectively, would be removed under the project. Therefore, habitat fragmentation in the immediate vicinity of the elderberry shrubs would not occur.
Although no modifications or removal of the identified elderberry shrubs are proposed and no work would occur within 75-feet and 50-feet of the shrubs, adverse effects to VELB could occur if elderberry shrubs occur within 165-feet of the project Area. Project activities planned to occur within 165-feet of a shrub include demolition of the bathroom, disconnection of various utilities, construction of the new bathroom, and removal of two trees. The trees to be removed are located approximately 110-feet from both shrubs, and 153-feet from the northern elderberry shrub.
Five mature trees and a vegetative buffer would remain intact between the elderberry shrubs and much of the proposed project work, including four mature oaks with 40- to 50-inch dbh, thereby providing protection from a portion of the project disturbance and remaining habitat continuity.
Direct and indirect effects to VELB are not anticipated due to the spatial and environmental buffer between VELB habitat and Project activities via the large mature trees and existing vegetation. The findings conclude that the proposed project will have no effect to VELB. The findings also conclude that the proposed project will have no effect on designated critical habitat for VELB. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is the federal lead agency for the project and will initiate Section 7 consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as needed. While the project will have a less than significant impact on VELB, the following conservation measures and BMPs have been incorporated into the project.
BIO-4. The construction area will be fenced, staked, or flagged as close to the limits as feasible.
BIO-5. A qualified biologist will provide training for all contractors, work crews, and any onsite personnel on the status of the VELB, its host plant and habitat, the need to avoid damaging the elderberry shrubs, and possible penalties for noncompliance.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Western Pond Turtle. The Sacramento River provides potential aquatic habitat for the western pond turtle, and upland habitats in the project area may be used for nesting. Use of heavy machinery could result in direct impacts such as injury or mortality of western pond turtle if individuals are present in the project area during construction. Nesting could be indirectly impacted by vegetation removal in upland habitats. Discharge of sediment into the river could also indirectly impact this species. Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-5 will reduce impacts on western pond turtle to a less-than-significant level.
Foothill Yellow-legged Frog. The project could adversely affect foothill yellow-legged frog if individuals were present in the project area during construction. Potential direct effects include harassment, injury, and mortality of individuals due to equipment and vehicle traffic. The species may also be affected if construction activities result in degradation of aquatic habitat and water quality due to erosion and sedimentation, and accidental fuel leaks or spills. Based on records and available habitat, the species has a moderate potential to be present, nest, and forage in the project area. MM-5 will also be used to ensure any impacts on foothill yellow-legged frogs would be less than significant.
Migratory Birds and Raptors. The project area and vicinity provide nesting and foraging habitat for various birds, including raptor species. Special-status bird species that could use these habitats include bald eagle, osprey, great egret, bank swallows, and a variety of migratory bird species. A bald eagle nest is located approximately 0.5 mile southeast of the project area, and an osprey nest is located approximately 515 feet north of the project area (directly across the river).
The nesting and breeding season for raptors is generally November through July, and a typical avoidance buffer is 450-feet for special status raptors unless a smaller buffer is approved by the CDFW. The nesting and breeding season for migratory birds is February through August and avoidance buffers vary based on the species.
Construction activities (e.g., vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and equipment noise) would occur during the avian and raptor breeding seasons and could disturb nesting birds or raptors in or adjacent to the project area, resulting in the loss of fertile eggs or nestlings or nest abandonment. Foraging birds and individuals present in or adjacent to the project area outside of the avian breeding season would not be adversely impacted by construction activities due to their high mobility and available habitat outside of the project area. Given the heavy daily use and activity in the area, the history of area construction without nest abandonment, and the distance of the project from the nests, it is unlikely the known nesting raptors would be impacted.
New raptor and migratory bird nests may be assembled prior to construction; therefore, pre- construction bird surveys will be incorporated. Mitigation Measure MM-6 will reduce the potential impacts on raptors and birds to a less-than-significant level.
Special-status Bats. The silver-haired bat and the hoary bat have moderate potential to occur within the project area based on the presence of suitable habitat, including mature trees, tree cavities, loose bark, and foliage. Bats may roost individually or in small groups in tree cavities or in riparian vegetation. Due to the ability of individual bats to move away from disturbance, direct impacts on bats are not expected when the bats are not in a maternity colony. If a tree is removed that contains a maternity colony, the removal could result in mortality or injury of individuals.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 21
February 2023
Indirect impacts may occur from construction disturbance if a maternity colony is present in or adjacent to the project area. Significant noise disturbance could result in adults temporarily or permanently leaving a maternity colony. Minor tree removal is proposed as part of the proposed project. Mitigation Measure MM-7 has been incorporated to reduce potential impacts to bats to a less-than-significant level.
b) A riparian corridor and forested hilly terrain exists along the Sacramento River and towards the western extent of the project area comprised of valley oak (Quercus lobata), California live oak (Juglans hindsii), interior live oak (Quercus wislizeni), willow (Salix spp.), white alder (Alnus rhombifolia), and non-native species tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Large mature trees (i.e. trees with diameters of 30 inches or greater) exist along the hilly terrain above the riparian corridor within the western portion of the project area and somewhat along the riverfront in the central and eastern portions of the project area.
These species includeg: valley oak, and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii). The large mature trees provide moderate shade over the southern bank of the Sacramento River. No large, mature trees would be removed as a result of the project. The remaining areas within the project area (parking lot, gravelled field, access roads) are highly developed. Trees within the parking lot consist of cork oak (Quercus suber), cedar (Thuja sp.), valley oak, and white mulberry (Morus alba).
Based on the assemblage of tree species, one sensitive natural community (SNC) was found to occur in the project area; Valley Oak Riparian Forest and Woodland. Areas of vegetation along the Sacramento River that do not consist of SNC assemblage species are considered riparian habitat. Two valley oak trees (8-inch diameter at breast height [dbh]) that are considered a component of the Valley Oak Riparian Forest and Woodland SNC would be removed.
The project would require the removal of s ix trees in the riparian corridor consisting of four native, and two non-native invasive species. Three of the riparian trees, which include two arroyo willows (18-inch dbh) and one California walnut (9-inch dbh), are located immediately west of the existing boat ramp on the lowest elevation of the hillside. These trees would be removed to construct the widened section of the boat ramp and the drift boat beach. During project development, the drift boat beach was modified to preserve numerous large trees. With this design modification, the project impact on SNC, riparian habitat, and native species were significantly reduced. One valley oak (20-inch dbh) and two tree of heaven (18-inch dbh) are located at the eastern end of the project and sit in the southern most section of the riparian corridor next to the parking lot. These three trees would be removed to construct the non- motorized pathway. Removal of the riparian trees would have an insignificant effect to shading on the River. At the western portion of the project, all of the large mature tree species sit on the hillside above the riparian trees and constitute nearly all shading. At the eastern end of the project, the valley oak and tree of heaven are located by the parking lot and do not contribute shading to the river.
Nine additional trees would be removed, including three native trees (valley oak, 6-inches dbh; valley oak, 12-inch dbh; and cedar, 14-inch dbh) which are located in the parking lot and upland area of the boat ramp. Six non-native trees would be removed, including five cork oak in the parking lot and one white mulberry near the restroom.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
The project would have temporary impacts consisting of tree trimming for construction access, a
nd permanent impacts including the removal of nine native trees; two SNC, four riparian, and three non-riparian. The removal of two SNC trees and four riparian trees will not result in a significant adverse effect to SNCs given the location, elevation, and size of the trees, as well as the abundance of surrounding mature vegetation being retained in the project area. The project will have a less than significant effect on SNCs. The project also includes standard conservation measure and BIO-1, which incorporates environmentally sensitive area (ESA) fencing to protect surrounding habitat.
Alth
ough the project will have a less than significant effect, native tree planting will be conducted. The project includes planting a minimum of 27 native trees (3 trees for every 1 native tree removed), within the project footprint and/or at the downstream kayak launch, which is slated for decommission. Revegetation of the kayak launch would naturalize the area, expand riparian habitat and increase shading over the Sacramento River. Planted trees will be irrigated and monitored for a three year establishment period. A revegetation plan will provided to the resource agencies during the permitting process. c) A total of 1.45 acres of potential waters of the United States occurs within the project area (GHD 2022) and consists of riverine “Other Waters of the U.S.” (Sacramento River). The project area does not include state or federal wetlands, or non-federal waters of the State.
The project would temporarily impact 0.13 acre of waters, and permanently impact 0.007 acre of waters. Temporary impacts would result from re-surfaced boat ramp, grading for the drift boat beach area, the gravel berm, and the gravel work pad. Permanent impacts would result from the expanded boat ramp section, the floating dock pile, and the extended floating dock panel.
Indirect impacts could occur due to erosion and sedimentation, accidental fuel leaks, and spills.
Conservation measures and BMPs BIO-1 through -3 (described above under Special-status Fish), and HAZ-1 through -5 included in Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials will be used to reduce potential impacts to federally-protected waters. The project would have no adverse effect on protected wetlands and impacts would be less than significant.
Prior to construction regulatory permits will be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404 permit), the California Department of Fish and Game (Section 1600 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement), the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 401 Water Quality Certification), and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (Floodway Encroachment Permit). A permit may also be required by the State Lands Commission.
d) The Sacramento River supports a variety of salmon, trout, and other aquatic species, including Chinook Salmon Steelhead, Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and other trout and bass species. There are four distinct runs of Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento River: fall, late fall, spring, and winter.
Riparian habitat can function as a wildlife corridor, and it is assumed that common and urban- adapted mammals, such as Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and North American Raccoons
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 23
February 2023
(Procyon lotor) utilize the riparian corridor within the project area. Additionally, the project area and action area are located within the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. The Sacramento River can be considered a large expanse of high quality natural habitat that would support high levels of migratory bird species stopover use, breeding, or wintering specifically, particularly for wading bird and waterfowl.
No “essential connectivity areas,” “natural landscape blocks,” or “small natural landscape areas” that would support other sensitive species have been identified or mapped in the project vicinity by the California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project (CDFW 2022). The “terrestrial connectivity” within the project area is considered to have “limited connectivity opportunity.” No new barriers to terrestrial wildlife movement would result, and the project would not substantially interfere with migratory birds, bats, or other species. The project would temporarily exclude fish from the wetted boat launch area; however, fish would be able to pass the area via the open river. The project would have a less than significant impact on wildlife corridors.
e) The
City has adopted a Tree Management Ordinance (Chapter 18.45 of the RMC) that promotes the conservation of mature, healthy trees in the design of new development. The ordinance also recognizes that the preservation of trees sometimes conflicts with necessary land-development requirements. There are no conflicts associated with the project that would prevent implementation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance or other resource protection ordinances. The project would have no impact on resource protection ordinances. f) There are no Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans covering the project area. The project would have no impact on any habitat conservation plan.
Documentation
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Sensitive Natural Communities. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Natural Diversity Database. City of Redding Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Tree Management Ordinance Biological Resources Report, GHD Consulting 2022
Biological Assessment, GHD Consulting 2022
Technical Memorandum, GHD Consulting 2022
Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, GHD 2022
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Framework for Assessing Impacts to the Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
Mitigation
MM-1. All in-water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
MM-2. Prior to any in-water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur. Prior to completion of
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in-water portion of the project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
MM-3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river channel).
MM-4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of ¾-inch minus, silt free, clean, spawning-grade gravel that meets Caltrans’ cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of 85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
MM-5. Twenty-four hours (24-hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal within 50-feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas), a qualified biologist shall perform a pre-construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and foothill yellow-legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow-legged frog are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified. Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat outside of the construction impact zone.
MM-6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey to locate active nests. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.
MM-7. Removal of large trees (10-inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15).
If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March 1 through August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the project area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre- construction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between those dates, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 25
February 2023
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Discussion
a, b, c) Archival research, consultation with the Native American community, and an intensive archaeological survey are summarized in the Archaeological Resources Study (Sonoma State University, 2022). The cultural resources inventory identified no cultural resources within the project area.
The project area, except for the western edge and west of the boat ramp, lies on a historical gravel point bar, the result of deposition at the bend of the Sacramento River. The lack of vegetation indicated on the 1944 USGS maps and the lack of historical development suggests this landform was low-lying and subject to flooding and reworking by the river. The current ground surface may be the result of filling. Although the project vicinity was a locus of Native American habitation, the project area’s sensitivity for surface and buried archaeological resources is low. In addition to being located on a historic gravel and sand point bar, the area has been extensively disturbed with low potential for human habitation.
The
main channel of the Sacramento River, at the project location, is natural, navigable, non- tidal, and, therefore, State sovereign land under the California State Land Commission’s (Commission) jurisdiction. A lease will be required for the portions of the project extending into the river below the ordinary low water mark. The title to all abandoned shipwrecks, archaeological sites, and historic or cultural resources on or in the tide and submerged lands of California is vested in the State and under the jurisdiction of the Commission (Pub. Resources Code, § 6313).
While the proposed project is not anticipated to impact cultural resources, the following standard conservation measures are included in every project. In the event of an unanticipated discovery of artifacts, including human remains, impacts would be less than significant.
CR-1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is the City’s policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
project undertaking limits are extended beyond the present survey APE limits. The final disposition of archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources recovered on State land under the jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission must be approved by the Commission.
CR-2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities in the vicinity of the find will be stopped and the Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office shall be notified. If the coroner determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains shall be conducted in accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or the NAHC, as appropriate.
Documentation
Archaeological Resources Study (Sonoma State University, 2022).
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
VI. ENERGY
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Discussion
a) During construction, vehicles including worker commuter vehicles and heavy construction equipment, would require the use of gasoline and diesel fuel for power. Construction is anticipated to last approximately 10 months. Construction is estimated to result in a short-term consumption of energy, representing a small demand on local and regional fuel supplies that would be easily accommodated and would be temporary. The short duration of equipment usage and incorporation of energy efficiencies would not create a wasteful or significant increase in demand for fuel supplies; therefore, impacts on energy resources would be less than significant.
b) The proposed project includes improvement of existing amenities and would not require the additional use of energy for operations. The proposed project would not prohibit energy conservation or the use of renewable energy (City of Redding 2009) and would not conflict
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 27
February 2023
with or obstruct the City’s plan for renewable energy. Because operations would be consistent with existing conditions, there would be no operational impact. Construction of the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact on state or local plans related to renewable energy.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan – Natural Resources Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,
or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake, fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publications 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-
site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
Discussion
a, c, d) There are no Alquist- Priolo earthquake faults designated in the project area; and there are no other documented earthquake faults in the immediate vicinity that pose a significant risk of rupture, ground shaking, or otherwise unstable ground conditions. The closest active fault is about 50 miles away from the project site. Implementation of the proposed project would not increase the potential for ground shaking to occur. Ground shaking activities such as earthquakes would have a negligible effect on the project, as it would be designed in accordance with current California Building Code (CBC) seismic design criteria. This CBC design criteria will be incorporated into the project design to help ensure that the project is built to withstand any potential ground shaking that could occur in the project area. The impact would be less than significant.
According to the City’s General Plan, landslides could occur in the westernmost portion of the City (City of Redding 2000); however, the proposed project is not located in an area prone to landslides. The project area is relatively flat and would not pose a significant hazard. There would be no impact related to landslides.
Other types of ground failure such as expansive soils and subsidence (i.e., the gradual settling or sinking of an area with little or no horizontal motion) are not considered to pose a significant hazard within the proposed project area as soils in that area are expected to have a medium to low potential for expansion. The impact would be less than significant.
Soil liquefaction occurs when ground shaking from an earthquake causes a sediment layer saturated with groundwater to lose strength and take on the characteristics of a fluid, thus becoming similar to quicksand. Factors determining the liquefaction potential are soil type, the level and duration of seismic ground motions, the type and consistency of soils, and the depth to groundwater. Loose sands and peat deposits, along with recent Holocene age deposits are more susceptible to liquefaction while older deposits of clayey silts, silty clays, and clays deposited in freshwater environments are generally stable under the influence of seismic ground shaking. According to the City’s Health and Safety Plan element, the project area is in an area having a high potential for liquefaction (City of Redding 2009).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 29
February 2023
Although soils in the project area have a high potential for liquefaction, key design features would help ensure the pathways and associated project features are constructed to provide structure stability and would be in conformance with state and federal building code requirements. The impact would, therefore, be less than significant. b) During construction , localized erosion could occur due to ground disturbance and stockpiling of soil in the project area. Storm drain and wastewater modification would require soil trenching and excavation. If not properly managed, substantial erosion of stockpiled soils could occur, and sediment could be transported into sensitive receiving waters; however, the proposed project is subject to certain erosion-control requirements and BMPs mandated by existing City regulations which includes:
City of Redding Grading Ordinance. This ordinance requires preparation of an erosion and sediment control plan for projects affecting more than one acre (Redding Municipal Code Title 16). The erosion and sediment control plan requires preparation and description of any BMPs that will be used during construction and post-construction, if needed.
City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance.
This ordinance requires preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for projects affecting greater than 1 acre (Redding Municipal Code Title 14).
The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify the sources of sediment and other pollutants that may affect water quality associated with stormwater discharges and to describe and ensure the implementation of BMPs to reduce those sources of sediment and other pollutants in stormwater discharges.
The potential for project construction to result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would be less than significant.
e) The proposed project does not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal; therefore, there would be no impact.
f) A review of published data (Paleobiology Database 2018) indicates that there are no known unique geologic features, fossil-bearing strata, or paleontological sites in the project area. The proposed project will have no impact on paleontological resources.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2000. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element. October Paleobiology Database. 2018. The paleobiology database. Available at:
https://paleobiodb.org/#/
.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact
on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Discussion
a) Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are recognized by wide consensus among the scientific community to contribute to global warming/climate change and associated environmental impacts because of their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere and affect climate. The major GHGs that are released from human activity include carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide (Governor’s Office of Planning and Research 2008). The primary sources of GHGs are from industrial facilities, transportation vehicles (including planes and trains), energy/electricity plants, and industrial and agricultural activities (such as dairies and hog farms) (CARB 2021).
GHG emissions from the proposed project would be generated offsite from the production of project materials (e.g., lights, electrical systems), as well as onsite construction-related equipment emissions. While the project would have an incremental contribution in the context of the county and region, construction-related GHG emissions would be short term and minor.
BMPs AQ-1 through AQ-6 (Section III Air Quality) will be incorporated into the proposed project which would reduce construction-related GHG emissions. Project operation would be consistent with existing conditions. The impact would be less than significant. b) The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted to reduce GHG emissions. As noted in impact “a” and in Section III Air Quality, the proposed project is in conformance with the City’s air quality policies and thresholds, follows state guidelines and regulations, and incorporates BMPs AQ-1 through AQ-6. The proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact on the City’s applicable plans, policies, or regulations related to GHG emissions. The impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan – Air Quality Element. California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022. Current California GHG Emission Inventory Data. Available at:
Current California GHG Emission Inventory Data | California Air Resources Board. Accessed June 5.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 31
February 2023
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. 2008. Technical advisory: CEQA and climate change: Addressing climate change through California Environmental Quality Act Review.
Sacramento, CA.
Shasta Air Quality Management District,
https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/index/drm_index/aq_index.aspx. Accessed December 2, 2022.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
or excessive noise for people residing or working
in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or
death involving wildland fires?
Discussion
a, b, d) The proposed project would not present a significant risk due to the use of hazardous materials or emissions. The project area is not on any lists of properties known to contain hazardous materials. A review of known hazardous materials sites databases identified one nearby leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site within an approximate 0.5 mile. The underground tank was removed and remediation actions were taken. The case was closed in 2013 and does not pose a threat to the proposed project in the form of hazardous material leaks or spills.
Construction activities pose a slight risk for solvent or fuel spills or leaks. In accordance with the City’s Stormwater Management Program, and as a part of the Clean Water Act Section 402, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, a SWPPP is required when obtaining a general construction permit. Compliance under water quality regulations and the SWPPP would require use of the following standard conservation measures and BMPs to avoid or minimize the potential for accidental release of hazardous materials from spills or fuel leaks during project construction:
HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents, will be stored and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter waters of the United States.
HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be contained upon detection and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable or the leaking equipment will be moved off site.
HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials shall be used to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for storage of all hazardous materials.
HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials shall be kept on site at all times for use in the event of an accidental spills.
HAZ-5. Absorbent materials shall be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. The absorbent material shall be promptly removed and properly disposed.
The implementation of the SWPPP required by state and local regulations would ensure that the proposed project would not pose a significant risk for solvent or fuel spills. The potential for
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 33
February 2023
project construction and operation to create a hazard to the public or the environment through the accidental spill or pollutants would be less than significant. c) There are no existing or currently proposed schools within 0.25 mile of the project area . There would be no impacts on schools.
e) The proposed project is located 1.8 miles from the Benton Airpark; however, the project would be outside of the airport influence area and the limited use at the Benton Airpark would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people working in the project area. No impact. f) The proposed project is located at the end of Aoki Way, which is classified as a local driveway or service road. The project area will be closed during construction; however, the site will include an access road and would not interfere with any emergency response plan. No impact. g) During the construction period, the use of construction equipment in and around vegetated areas increases the potential for wildfire ignition. The project area consists of vegetated areas that could be susceptible to wildfires. However, the proposed project would be constructed in compliance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements, including the California Fire Code, which would ensure that the potential for construction equipment to spark a wildland fire is minimal. Operation of the proposed project would be consistent with existing operations and would not increase the existing wildfire potential. The potential for wildfire ignition from construction and operation of the proposed project would be less than significant.
Documentation
California State Water Resources Control Board. 2022. Geotracker available at:
http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2022. EnviroStor – Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese) available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/. City of Redding Storm Water Management Program available at:
https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/environmental-management/storm- water-management.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground water quality?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or through the
addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner
which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Discussion
a) The boat ramp and drift beach would require work within the Sacramento River. Equipment would be operated from the ramp, beach, and a temporary gravel work pad, and would not enter the river. The precast boat ramp would be installed without dewatering the construction area, instead a gravel berm would be constructed in a semi-circle to contain the water in the work area. Disturbed sediment would settle back to the bottom without entering the river.
Th
e City’s construction standards require that all projects prepare a plan to address water pollution control and incorporate this plan into the project design. In accordance with the City’s Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, and as a part of the Clean Water Act Section 402, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, the construction standards and specifications for the proposed project will require that an Erosion and Sediment
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 35
February 2023
Control Plan (ESCP) be prepared by the contractor prior to construction. The ESCP would help ensure that water quality standards are not substantially affected by the proposed project through the implementation of sediment control measures and runoff prevention practices. The ESCP, BMPs HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, as well as the following BMPs would be implemented:
WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project disturbance area.
WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas.
WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate facility.
The proposed project would have a less than significant impact on water quality. b) Project construction would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies because no groundwater would be used, and no groundwater wells would be affected during construction.
The project would have no impact on groundwater.
c) The project would implement an ESCP and comply with a construction general permit or NPDES that would result in minimal erosion or siltation from the construction of the project, and result in a less than significant impact.
The project would expand the parking lot and widen the boat launch, which would alter the drainage pattern in the project area. The improvements would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite, as stormwater treatment facilities would create some retention. Vehicles using both the parking lot and boat launch create the potential for pollutants to sit on the pavement; however, storm water treatment features have been incorporated into the landscaping features. The treatment features will capture surface flow, treat the flow by removing pollutants, and allow the flow to gradually leave the feature and enter the storm drain system.
A Floodplain Encroachment Assessment (Pacific Hydrologic, 2023) was prepared to evaluate potential impacts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulatory 100-year floodplain and designated floodway. It was determined that the project and associated improvements are not within the designated floodway or FEMA floodplain and the project would not result in an encroachment or fill.
The project would not result in flooding, affect the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact.
d) The project area includes work within and adjacent to the Sacramento River. The northern portion of the project area is shown in the designated as Floodway Zone AE (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2011). Zone AE is a floodplain designation that has mapped base flood elevations (BSE) determined, and is mapped as a special flood hazard area. The existing boat ramp is partially inundated throughout the year, which allows recreational users to launch their boats. While the boat launch would be widened to allow two boats to be launched
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
at one time, the improvements are not anticipated to significantly increase use. The current boat ramp configuration requires trucks to sit idling while waiting to access the ramp. The widened ramp will provide efficiency and reduce the amount of time vehicles sit near the water. The threat of a tsunami wave is not applicable to inland, central valley communities such as Redding. Seiches could potentially be generated in either Shasta or Whiskeytown lakes during an earthquake. If a seiche were to overtop Shasta Dam, or in the event of dam failure, the project area would be within the inundation zone. However, regional history documents that the potential for such a threat is low (City of Redding 2000). The project would have a less than significant risk for release of pollutants due to project inundation.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element figures 4-1 (Ground Shaking Potential) and 4.2 (Liquefaction Potential).
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Floodplain regulations, FIRM Map 06089C1539G, March 17, 2011.
Floodplain Encroachment Assessment, Pacific Hydrologic Incorporated, January 2023 Mitigation
No mitigation necessary.
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Discussion
a,b) The proposed project would not divide an established community. The proposed project would be constructed on existing City property and would enhance recreational opportunities for the public. The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable policies and regulations of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There would be no impact.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan.
City of Redding. 2022. Municipal Code.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 37
February 2023
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State
Geologist that would be of value to the region and
the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or
other land use plan?
Discussion
a,b) The project area is not identified in the City’s General Plan as having any known mineral resource value or as being located within any critical mineral resource overlay area. No impact would occur.
Documentation
City of Redding. 2009. General Plan – Natural Resources Element. California Department of Conservation. 2016. Mines Online. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mol/index.html.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
XIII. NOISE
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Discussion
a,b) The proposed project would be located in a recreational area adjacent to the river. Existing ambient noise and vibration includes trucks towing trailers along the roadway and utilizing the boat ramp, as well as conversation from recreational users. Noise levels would increase during construction due to the operation of equipment; however, this would be temporary in nature and operation would occur during daylight hours. Construction noise would consist of grading and excavation equipment, trucks, and construction personnel. The project includes cast in drilled hole piles, but does not include pile driving or other percussive methods for construction.
Operation of the project would be similar to existing conditions. Widening of the ramp is not anticipated to increase use, but to make the existing use more efficient. Operation of the drift boat beach will allow more room and increase safety, so those using rafts or kayaks can launch without using the vehicular boat ramp. No permanent or long-term noise impacts would occur because of the proposed project. Noise impacts would be less than significant. c) The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan or near any airports; therefore, there would be no impacts.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Noise Element, 2000.
Redding Municipal Airport. 2004. Redding Municipal Airport Master Plan. https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showdocument?id=865.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 39
February 2023
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Discussion
a-b) The recreational improvement project would be constructed in an existing recreational area.
The project is bordered by the river, a cemetery, the rodeo grounds, and Turtle Bay Exploration Park. All properties in the vicinity are zoned for public use or currently built-out. The project would not induce population growth or displace people. The project would have no impact on population and housing.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Housing Element 2014.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Fire Protection?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
b) Police Protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
Discussion
a-e) The proposed project would not cause substantial adverse physical impacts on government facilities or negatively affect public services. Similarly, access to schools, parks, and other public facilities would not be affected since access will be maintained through the project area during construction. Proposed contractor construction access in the area may temporarily interfere with access to the boat ramp. The proposed project would not result in substantial conflict or lack of emergency access. The proposed project would have a less-than-significant temporary impact, and no permanent impact, on public services.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XVI. RECREATION
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 41
February 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
Discussion
a) The proposed project primarily involves boating and fishing recreation, and would not impact the number of users at existing neighborhood or regional parks or the physical deterioration of those facilities. The project would have no impact.
b) The larger project components include widening the existing boat ramp, creating a drift boat beach, installing a new restroom, expanding the parking lot, and extending the Sacramento River Trail approximately 650 feet. The proposed project will have a minor impact on native trees and require fill in jurisdictional waters; however, these impacts would not have a significant physical effect on the environment. The project would have a less than significant impact.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Recreation Element, 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Element, 2000.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including
transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Ci ty of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Discussion
a) Construction of the proposed project would generate vehicle trips associated with worker commutes and material and equipment hauling. The increases in trips per day on local and regional roadways within the City could affect roadway capacity and circulation by introducing slower movements and larger turning radii of construction trucks compared to passenger vehicles if the number of trips were to result in a significant increase from the current local conditions.
The proposed project would generate construction traffic throughout the 10-month construction period with periods of heavier use (i.e., during grading) and periods of minimal vehicle use (i.e., site restoration). The proposed project would not conflict with the City of Redding General Plan policies or the City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan (City of Redding 2018). The proposed project would not conflict with any program, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, and the impact would be less than significant. b) Section 15064.3(b) of the current CEQA Guidelines shifts transportation impact analysis from a level of service (LOS) standard to a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) standard that refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. However, VMT does not currently include recreational uses. The proposed project would require some haul, vendor, and worker trips over the 10-month construction period. The technical advisory provided by the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) provides that projects with less than 110 trips per day are presumed less than significant (OPR 2018). The proposed project would result in less than 110 trips per day during construction and would result in no additional maintenance trips during operation of the proposed project. The proposed project would result in a less than significant impact.
c) The proposed project, once constructed, would be consistent with existing use and would not result in changes to roadways causing an increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use on any roadways in the area. During construction, equipment and vehicles would be intermittently entering and exiting Aoki Way. This could pose a potential hazard from interaction with the general public on this public roadway. However, construction activities would be temporary and would largely occur within the closed boat launch area (i.e., away from the public roadways) and would not result in a substantial hazard. The proposed project would have no impact related to hazards from geometric design features.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 43
February 2023
d) Construction of the proposed project would not substantially interfere with emergency access.
Constriction activities would be short-term and temporary in nature with possible partial closure and restrictions on Aoki Way. Construction will occur at the end of a dead-end road and through traffic is not possible in the baseline condition. Emergency vehicles would be allowed to come into and out of the construction area as needed. Once constructed, the proposed project area would be open and would not impact emergency access. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Transportation Element, 2000. City of Redding Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, 2018. California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory On Evaluation Transportation Impacts in CEQA. http://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122- 743_Technical_Advisory.pdf.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project: cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and scope
of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that
is:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Discussion
a, b) A letter was sent to the NAHC on February 10 , 2022, requesting a review of their Sacred Lands File and contact information for potentially interested individuals. A response was received on
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
February 28, 2022, which reported that no Native American cultural sites are known in the project area. On February 28, 2022, letters were sent to individuals/groups who may have information regarding the proposed project area. On August 17, 2022, the City sent formal notification of determination that a decision to undertake a project, and notice of consultation opportunity, pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1. Two local Tribes responded, and consultation is ongoing. No tribal cultural resources were identified in the project area, and the proposed project would have no impact on tribal cultural resources.
Documentation
Anthropological Studies Center at Sonoma State University. 2022. Archaeological Resources Study of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment
or storm water drainage, electric power, natural
gas, or telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 45
February 2023
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
Discussion
a) The proposed project would not require construction or relocation of water, electrical, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities. The proposed project would require modification and replacement of storm water and wastewater facilities due to the proposed new restroom and expansion of the parking lot. The proposed project would not result in any other infrastructure improvements or require relocation of existing infrastructure beyond what has been analyzed herein; therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. b) Construction and operation of the proposed project would not require the use of potable water.
Water required for construction use, such as for dust control and pipeline testing, would be available from the City’s existing water resources and would not require substantial amounts of additional water supplies. Operation of the proposed project would not require water exceeding existing use. The proposed project would have sufficient water supplies to serve the project, and the impact would be less than significant.
c) The proposed project would provide wastewater conveyance capacity similar to the existing capacity. The existing wastewater lines will be replaced and relocated. The existing restroom is operated by a small wastewater lift station that serves only the surrounding businesses. The lift station would not be improved and the project would not create additional wastewater capacity.
The project has no potential to induce growth and the project would have no impact. d,e) The proposed project construction activities would generate a minor amount of debris requiring disposal at a suitable facility, such as the City’s West Central Landfill, which has sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project with 6,589,044 cubic yards of remaining capacity and a maximum permitted capacity of 700 tons per day (CalRecycle 2019).
Standard construction specifications would require recycling of some materials such as concrete to reduce landfill waste. Any potentially hazardous materials would be disposed of at an approved landfill. Through construction specifications, the City will confirm that the proposed project complies with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations pertaining to recycling and disposal of solid waste. The impact would be less than significant.
Documentation
City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities Elements, 2000. CalRecycle. 2019. Facility Operations, West Central Landfill. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/45-AA-0043/Detail/. Mitigation No mitigation required.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from
a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Discussion
a-d) The proposed project area is within a local responsibility area and is in an area designated by CAL FIRE that is a ‘Non-Very High Fire Severity Zone”. While all undeveloped areas are susceptible to wildfire, the proposed project would be constructed in compliance withal applicable local, state, and federal requirements, including the California Fire Code, which would minimize the potential for construction equipment to spark a wildland fire. The proposed project would not affect emergency evacuation plans, result in the uncontrolled spread of wildfire, require installation or maintenance of associated wildfire infrastructure, or expose people or structures to significant risks related to wildfires. The proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to wildfires. Construction and operational impacts related to fire hazards would be less than significant.
Documentation
CAL FIRE. 2008. Very High Fire Severity Zones in LRA- Shasta County. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6806/fhszl_map45.pdf
.
City of Redding. 2000-2020 General Plan. Health and Safety Element.
Mitigation
No mitigation required.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 47
February 2023
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-Than-
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than-
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below the self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have potential environmental
effects which may cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Discussion
a) The proposed project would have minimal potential to degrade the quality of the environment, affect wildlife populations or their habitats, or reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant and animal species. Although special-status wildlife species, including Central Valley spring-run ESU Chinook salmon, Sacramento River winter-run ESU Chinook salmon, and Central Valley DPS steelhead, including designated habitat for these species may be impacted by implementation of the proposed project, standard conservation measures, BMPs, and mitigation measures will be used to avoid adverse impacts on these species.
Additionally, implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to impact cultural resources, therefore the proposed project would not eliminate examples of history or prehistory. b) As described in Section III, the proposed project could temporarily contribute to cumulative air quality impacts. However, these impacts would be considered less than significant and under policy of the City’s General Plan, application of standard BMPs would eliminate the potential for air quality impacts during project implementation. Upon project completion the proposed project would not result in an increase in emissions and would therefore not be cumulatively considerable. The project’s potential cumulative traffic impacts would be less than significant.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Initial Study Public Works Department, Engineering Division
March 2023
c) As discussed in this document, the proposed project does not include any activities that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level or that could otherwise cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Documentation
See all sections above
Mitigation
MM-1. All in-water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
MM-2. Prior to any in-water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur. Prior to completion of the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in-water portion of the project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
MM-3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river channel).
MM-4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of ¾-inch minus, silt free, clean, spawning-grade gravel that meets Caltrans’ cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of 85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
MM-5. Twenty-four hours (24-hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal within 50-feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas), a qualified biologist shall perform a pre-construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and foothill yellow-legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow-legged frog are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified. Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat outside of the construction impact zone.
MM-6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey to locate active nests. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 49
February 2023
found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.
MM-7. Removal of large trees (10-inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15).
If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March 1 through August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the project area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre- construction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between those dates, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study
APPENDIX A
Figure 1 – Project Vicinity
Figure 2 – Project Area
Figure 3 – Project Action Area
Figure 4 – Boat Launch Ramp Section
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Sundial Bridge Dr
Audiorium Dr
6DFUDPHQWR5LYHU
Legend
Action Area
Project Area
FIGURE 3
11/10/2022Date
-Revision No.
12558750Project No.
Action Area
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
Improvement Project
City of Redding
N
Map Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Horizontal Datum: North American 1983
Grid: NAD 1983 StatePlane California I FIPS 0401 Feet
0 100 200 300 400 500
Feet
Paper Size ANSI A
Data source: World Imagery: City of Redding GIS, Maxar. Created by: ethompson3\\ghdnet\ghd\US\Redding\Projects\561\12558750\GIS\Maps\Deliverables\12558750_TurtBay.aprx - 12558750_03_AA Print date: 10 Nov 2022 - 12:07
.D\DN/DXQFKWREH
'HFRPPLVVLRQHGLQ
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) FIGURE 4
11/10/2022Date
-Revision No.
12558750Project No.
Boat Launch Ramp Section
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
Improvement Project
City of Redding
N
Paper Size ANSI A
Data source: . Created by: ethompson3\\ghdnet\ghd\US\Redding\Projects\561\12558750\GIS\Maps\Deliverables\12558750_TurtBay.aprx Print date: 10 Nov 2022 - 12:13
APPROVED Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for
ATTACHMENT C
Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Turt
le Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 1
March 2023
MITIGATION MONITORING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM
TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020064)
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (MMP/ECP) for the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (project). The MMP/ECP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for, and the purpose of, the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance; a key to understanding the monitoring matrix; and the monitoring matrix.
LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration (MND). This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. It is intended to be used by City of Redding (City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring personnel during implementation of the project.
Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following:
Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment. Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project.
Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.
The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, onsite identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff.
In addition to meeting the CEQA MMP requirements, this document incorporates environmental commitments, standard practices, conservation measures, and best management practices (BMPs).
The environmental commitments may be part of the project design, standard contract specifications, City requirements, or conservation measures. These commitments are part of the project, but they do not constitute mitigation under CEQA as they have not been incorporated to reduce a potentially significant impact.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program
March 2023
MITIGATION MONITORING/ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE The MMP/ECP Table identifies the mitigation measures and commitments proposed for the project.
The tables have the following columns:
Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific potentially significant impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study.
Environmental Commitment: Lists the commitments identified within the project that are not related to a potentially significant CEQA impact, but further ensure environmental resource protection.
Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed.
Agency/Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure. Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a specific mitigation measure.
NONCOMPLIANCE COMPLAINTS
Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures and commitments associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form, providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall investigate and determine the validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take appropriate action to remedy any violation. The compliant shall receive written confirmation indicating the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 3
March 2023
MITIGATION MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE
TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020064)
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
The following environmental commitments will be incorporated into the project to further protect environmental and biological resources:
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Air Quality (AQ)
AQ-1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers will be applied according to manufacturer’s specification to all inactive construction areas.
Construction Construction
Management
AQ-2. All grading operations will be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.
Construction Construction
Management
AQ-3. Water all stockpiles, access roads, and disturbed or exposed areas, as necessary, to prevent airborne dust.
Construction Construction
Management
AQ-4. Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code (Section 23114(e)(4)) (California Legislative Information 2016), all trucks hauling soil and other loose material to and from the construction site will be covered or will maintain at least 6 inches of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of load and the trailer).
Construction Construction
Management
AQ-5. All public roadways used by the project contractor will be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets will be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads.
Construction Construction
Management
Biological Resources (BIO)
BIO-1. As required by the City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, an erosion and sediment control plan (ESCP) or will be prepared to address BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss. The ESCP must also address dust control, spill control, pollution control, waste management, equipment maintenance and fueling, and materials storage within the project site.
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 4
March 2023
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
BIO-2. Appropriate erosion and sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) shall be in place prior to the onset of construction activities near jurisdictional waters and in project areas where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into jurisdictional waters. The measures shall be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near avoided waters and riparian areas. In addition, equipment entry and exit points; and staging, storage, and stockpile areas must be clearly marked prior to the entry of mechanized equipment or vehicles into the construction area.
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-4. The construction area will be fenced, staked, or flagged as close to the limits as feasible. Preconstruction/ Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-5. A qualified biologist will provide training for all contractors, work crews, and any onsite personnel on the status of the VELB, its host plant and habitat, the need to avoid damaging the elderberry shrubs, and possible penalties for noncompliance.
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
Cultural Resources (CR)
CR-1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is City policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed project undertaking limits are extended beyond the present survey APE limits. The final disposition of archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources recovered on State land under the jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission must be approved by the Commission.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
CR-2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities near the find will be stopped, and the Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office will be notified. If the coroner determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains will be conducted in accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or NAHC, as appropriate.
Construction City/NAHC/
County Coroner
Hazards and Hazardous Materials (HAZ)
HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents will be stored and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter waters of the United States.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 5
March 2023
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be contained upon detection, and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable, or the leaking equipment will be moved offsite.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials will be used to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for storage of all hazardous materials.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials will be kept onsite at all times for use in the event of an accidental spill.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-5. Absorbent materials will be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. The absorbent material will be promptly removed and disposed of properly.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
Hydrology and Water Quality (WQ)
WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project disturbance area.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas. Construction City/ Construction
Management
WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate facility.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MITIGATION MEASURES Resource-specific mitigation measures that will be used during project implementation include the following:
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 6
March 2023
Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
MM-1. All in-water work shall occur during April 1 through June 30 to avoid peak times when listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-2. Prior to any in-water work, qualified fish biologists, in consultation with CDFW, shall utilize seine netting to work from the edge of water, outward just before berm construction to remove any individuals that could be within the work area. No handling of fish shall occur.
Prior to completion of the gravel berm, the area will be surveyed and seined again by qualified fish biologists to ensure absence of fish in the work area. The berm will serve as a barrier to the in-water portion of the project area. After the gravel berm is constructed, the work pad may be constructed.
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-3. Prior to any placement of gravel in water, heavy equipment operation practices shall be implemented that minimize the potential for injury or death of listed fish species, including alerting fish to equipment operation in the channel before gravel is placed in the water (i.e. slow, deliberate equipment operation and gently tapping water surface prior to entering or placing gravels in the river channel).
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-4. The gravel berm and work pad shall be constructed out of ¾-inch minus, silt free, clean, spawning-grade gravel that meets Caltrans’ cleanness test (California Test No. 227) with a value of 85 or higher. Upon construction completion, the gravel berm would be breached and the gravel pad and berm would be left in place to provide the benefit of approximately 236 cubic yards of spawning grade gravels to augment spawning opportunities for salmon.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-5. Twenty-four hours (24-hours) prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal within 50-feet of suitable reptile and/or amphibian habitat (i.e., Sacramento River and riparian areas), a qualified biologist shall perform a pre-construction survey for western pond turtle, their nests, and foothill yellow-legged frog. If western pond turtles, their nests, or yellow- legged frog are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and CDFW will be notified.
Upon authorization from CDFW, a qualified biologist may relocate the individual(s) the shortest distance possible to a location containing habitat outside of the construction impact zone.
Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Page 7
March 2023
Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
MM-6. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey to locate active nests. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-7. Removal of large trees (10-inch dbh or greater) with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 15). If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the non-volant season (March 1 through August 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the project area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect the colonies from disturbance. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities for seven days or longer occurs between those dates, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If a maternity colony is found a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest.
Construction City/
Construction
Management
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for
ATTACHMENT D
Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
Response to Public Comments Received on CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, State Clearinghouse #2023020064
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project was made available to the public and interested agencies for a minimum 30-day review period. The agency review period was managed by the State Clearinghouse (SCH) and closed on March 3, 2023. The public review period was managed by staff and also closed on March 3, 2023. All written comments received during the public and agency review period are attached, along with written responses to environmental issues raised by commenters on the IS/MND. Comments received on the public draft IS/MND do not identify new significant impacts or significant new information that would require recirculation of the draft IS/MND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. T his technical memorandum is being used to sum marize comments and support adoption of the public draft IS/MND.
Response to Comments
A total of four comment letter s w ere received regarding the IS/MND. The comment letter s were submitted by the California State Lands Commission, the Redding Rodeo Assoc iation, Marj Cantrell, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The letters are attached to this technical memorandum:
California State Lands Commission (Letter A)
1. Letter A was submitted by the California State Lands Commission and includes four comments related to the figures and cultural resources.
Comment 1 and Comment 2. Maps and Figures:
Response: The City of Redding looks forward to coordinating with you to obtain a new lease for the boat ramp. Given the grant timeline and limited value in regard to public disclosure, the City is not able to add revised mapping and figures at this time. However, the City will provide new and modified maps and figures to your office during the lease coordination process.
Comment 3 and Comment 4. Cultural Resources:
Response: The City has added the requested language to the final CEQA document.
Redding Rodeo Association (Letter B)
2. Letter B was submitted by the Redding Rodeo Association and includes 14 comments.
Comment 1. Events and Activities:
Response: The boat ramp parking area is a public lot, outside of the Rodeo lease area. The construction project schedule will address impacts to community events by limiting construction activities during specified windows. With environmental restrictions and permitting, the in-water
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
2 work window is limited to between April 1 and June 30 of any given construction year.
Construction area footprints and activities will be limited during events in this window and written into the construction contract.
Comment 2. Inclusion and Input:
Response: The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. The documents were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website.
A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and a Notice of Intent was posted in the local newspaper. In additions, the Rodeo Association has attended and hosted project meetings during the development process.
Comment 3. Contractual Concerns:
Response: There are no funds allocated for construction at this time. Staff anticipates a build year of 2027, the year in which the kayak launch at Riverfront Park can be decommissioned. There are some impacts to the lease area, and staff anticipates negotiating the lease area should the lease be renewed. Per the design team, the construction window is adequate for the work required to complete the task. Should a delay occur, the same contract provisions concerning work windows and facility availability would be in effect to minimize impacts to existing events and operations.
Comment 4. Declaration:
Response: The Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project has been in the planning process for approximately 3-years. In addition to public outreach and consultation with state and federal resource agencies, technical and scientific studies were conducted to identify, and allow the City to consider , any direct and reasonably foreseeable indirect physical changes in the environment which may be caused by the project.
Unfortunately the comment regarding missing, flawed, incomplete, or erroneous information cannot be addressed , as it is not specific to an environmental resource and does not cont ain detailed information that can be reviewed by the City.
The City provided the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15072. Please see the response to comment number 2 for detail.
Comment 5. Incomplete Evaluation:
Response: All environmental factors were evaluated and considered in the Initial Study; however, only those with a potentially significant impact were included in the table. The final environmental document will be modified to include a statement indicating that these categories would have potentially significant impacts.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
3 Comment 6. Page Two of the Declaration:
Response: All environmental factors were evaluated and considered in the Initial Study . The findings in the Initial Study are supported by consultation with state and federal resource agencies, as well as the technical and scientific studies conducted for the project.
Comment 7. Hydrological Concerns:
Response: As described in the Initial Study, Section X (c). Hydrology and Water Q uality, a Floodplain Encroachment Assessment was prepared by Pacific Hydrologic Incorporated (PHI) to evaluate potential impacts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulatory 100-year floodplain and designated floodway. PHI determined that the project and associated improvements are not within the designated floodway or FEMA floodplain and the project would not result in an encroachment or fill.
Comment 8. Water Quality and Pollution Concerns:
Response: The City has conducted multiple meetings with the regulatory agencies from which a permit or approval will be required. These agencies include the California State Water Resources Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Each of these agencies are familiar with the project and have provided input regarding construction timing and methods to reduce impacts to water quality. A discussion of potential water quality impacts and conservation measures can be found in the Initial Study, Section X(c). Hydrology and Water Quality.
The proposed project is not anticipated to increase use, but instead it will better accommodate the existing boat launch users. The boat ramp will be widened by 3-feet which will allow two vehicles to launch their non-motorized boats at the same time. The existing ramp allows only a single boat to be launched, while the other vehicles sit while waiting to launch.
Water quality will be improved, as t he City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) General Permit requires the project to incorporate storm water treatment features. The treatment features will filter vehicle contamina nts from the storm water before it leaves the parking area.
The construction will also address current sediment runoff issues stemming from the rodeo ground in-field drainage system, reducing turbidity caused during rain events. The project will improve habitat with new shaded aquatic zones, reduced runoff, and the removal of invasive species. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has requested that the City improve the existing boat launch facility, so that other kayak and drift boat facilities can be decommissioned. The other boat launch facilities need to be decommissioned as they are located in areas where human activity, sediment, and turbidity are harming salmonid redds.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
4 Comment 9. Concrete:
Response: The project does not include a dam, and the berm has been incorporated based on input from the resource agencies. The berm will consist of clean washed spawning gravel, will prevent construction sediment from creating turbidity in the river, and will be left in the river upon completion to encourage downstream spawning. The widened boat ramp section will be pre -cast concrete and placed in the river. The City is coordinating with the resource agencies and will obtain all necessary permits and approvals.
Comment 10. Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act:
Response: While it is not required, the City has conducted early consultation with the appropriate regulatory agencies. Please see the response to comment 8.
Comment 11. California Environmental Quality Act Compliance:
Response: The City is in compliance with CEQA. The CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b) states, “Prior to approving a project, the decision- making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public revi ew process. The decision -making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis.” Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and approval of the project, is a requirement of CEQA, but does not ensure project funding or future project approvals. Grant funding was used to perform the environmental and design phases of the project; howeve r, additional City Council approval(s) will be required if a funding mechanism is identified for construction.
Comment 12. Mitigated Negative Declaration:
Response: CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(a) states, “Following preliminary review, the Lead Agency shall conduct an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment.” If the agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, then an EIR is prepared. Neither the Initial Study nor the comment letter provide evidence of any potentially significant impact that cannot be mitigated to a level that is less than significant.
Preparation of an EIR is not warranted.
Comment 13. Environmental Impact Report:
Response: Neither the Initial Study nor the comment letter provide evidence of any potentially significant impact. Preparation of an EIR is not warranted and a formal alternatives analysis is not required. Unfortunately the comment regarding flaws in the mitigation measures is vague and provides no information regarding a specific environmental resource, mitigation measure, or why
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
5 the commenter believes it is flawed. Due to the generality, the C ity is unable to address this comment.
Comment 14. Summary:
Response: The City has prepared the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation and Monitoring Program based on public outreach, consultation with state and federal resource agencies, as well as technical and scientific studies . Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study, supporting documentation, and public comment ) and the mitigation measure s incorporated into the project, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
Marj Cantrell (Letter C)
3. Letter C was submitted by Marj Cantrell and includes 5 comments.
Comment 1. Public Input:
Response: City staff held a stakeholder meeting at the Redding Rodeo Grounds on March 24, 2022. The meeting included members of the fishing and guide community, the Rodeo Association, representatives from the paddle sport community, Redding Memorial Park, Turtle Bay, the Civic Auditorium and Shasta Living Streets. Additionally, two meetings were held with Rodeo Association staff on August 2, 2022, and November 15 th, 2022. Several on site meetings have taken place with Redding Memorial Park staff and the Wintu Tribe of Northern California on June 3, 2022.
Comment 2. Existing Facility and River Closure:
Response: In the last decade, boating activity in Redding has seen a steady rise, and this stretch of the river provides a world- class f ly-fishing experience. The City’s use data indicates the ramp’s popularity has contributed to an over-capacity condition, as the narrow launch ramp does not allow two boats to efficiently launch at one time. Those who use the facility have expressed concern for the lack of capacity and the floating dock’s inadequacy for use by drift boats, which are extremely common in the river.
Comment 3. Expanded Parking:
Response: The Redding Rodeo Association leases land from the City, and the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project abuts the rodeo grounds. The project will impact a small portion of the lease area, and staff anticipates negotiating the lease area should the lease be renewed. Additional parking is needed to meet current recreational demands . The construction project schedule will address impacts to community events by limiting construction activities during specified windows.
Comment 4. Alternate Location:
Response: This project is a refurbishment of an existing facility as well as a decommissioning of an existing non-motorized launch. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife approached
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
6 the City regarding the Riverfront Park ramp requesting it be decommissioned to improve salmonid habitat. Those users should be relocated to a similar position on the river, and the existing boat ramp cannot handle the increased demand. Additionally, the aged facility requires a major facelift to meet standards for ADA accessibility an d to improve public safety.
Construction of a new boat ramp in a new location (Turtle Bay East off of Bechelli Lane or other) would have a much greater environmental impact (fish, water quality, traffic, etc.). Widening the existing boat ramp is cost effective and results in less environmental impact.
Comment 5. Public Comment Period:
Response: In addition to the public outreach that was conducted for the project (see response to comment 1), t he IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30- day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. The documents were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Depar tment website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project and a Notice of Intent was posted in the local ne wspaper. The grant timeline is strict, any variance from the project schedule included in the grant contract may result in the loss of grant funding. Staff is confident in the stakeholder engagement and that design of the facility will meet the needs of the users, who have reviewed and commented on the project plans.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Letter D)
4. Letter D was submitted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and includes 1 comment.
Comment 1 . Studies and Avoidance and Minimization Measures:
Response: The City appreciates the early coordination and input provided by CDFW staff.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS
COMMISSION
100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8202
JENNIFER LUCCHESI, Executive Officer
916.574.1800
TTY CA Relay Service: 711 or Phone 800.735.2922
from Voice Phone 800.735.2929
or for Spanish 800.855.3000
Contact Phone: 916.574.1900
March 3, 2023
File Ref: SCH #2023020064
City of Redding
Amber Kelley
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY [email protected]
Subject: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project, Shasta County
Dear Amber Kelley:
The California State Lands Commission (Commission) staff has reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project (Project), which is being prepared by the City of Redding (City).
The City, as the public agency proposing to carry out the Project, is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). The Commission is a trustee agency for projects that could directly or indirectly affect State sovereign land and their accompanying Public Trust resources or uses. Additionally, because the Project involves work on State sovereign land, the Commission will act as a responsible agency.
Commission Jurisdiction and Public Trust Lands
The Commission has jurisdiction and management authority over all ungranted tidelands, submerged lands, and the beds of navigable lakes and waterways.
The Commission also has certain residual and review authority for tidelands and submerged lands legislatively granted in trust to local jurisdictions (Pub.
Resources Code, §§ 6009, subd. (c); 6009.1; 6301; 6306). All tidelands and submerged lands, granted or ungranted, as well as navigable lakes and waterways, are subject to the protections of the common law Public Trust Doctrine.
Comment Letter A
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding Page 2 March 3, 2023
As general background, the State of California acquired sovereign ownership of all tidelands and submerged lands and beds of navigable lakes and waterways upon its admission to the United States in 1850. The State holds these lands for the benefit of all people of the State for statewide Public Trust purposes, which include but are not limited to waterborne commerce, navigation, fisheries, water-related recreation, habitat preservation, and open space. On navigable non-tidal waterways, including lakes, the State holds fee ownership of the bed of the waterway landward to the ordinary low-water mark and a Public Trust easement landward to the ordinary high-water mark, except where the boundary has been fixed by agreement or a court. Such boundaries may not be readily apparent from present day site inspections.
The main channel of the Sacramento River, at the project location, is natural, navigable, non-tidal, and, therefore, State sovereign land under the Commission’s jurisdiction. A lease will be required for the portions of the project extending into the river below the ordinary low water mark.
Project Description
The City proposes to upgrade their facilities at the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp site to meet the City’s residents’ increased interest in boating and fly-fishing.
From the Project Description, Commission staff understands that the Project would include a two-lane boat ramp, an extension of the existing floating dock, and a new boating access beach adjacent to the ramp for drift boats and non- motorized vessel launching, all of which have potential to affect State sovereign land.
Environmental Review
Commission staff requests that the City consider the following comments on the Project’s IS/MND, to ensure that impacts to State sovereign land are adequately analyzed for the Commission’s use of the IS/MND when considering a future lease application for the Project.
General Comments
1. Missing base layer: In Figure 3, the map showing the kayak launch to be decommissioned in 2027, the base layer is missing. Please include a base layer to the map.
2. Additional Figure: Please include a figure that shows the potential locations for the boat ramp and boating access beach. This will allow Commission Staff to determine which components of the project will be in Commission Comment 1
Comment 2
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding Page 3 March 3, 2023
jurisdiction and better aid with determining potential environmental impacts as a Responsible Agency.
Cultural Resources
3. Title to Resources Within Commission Jurisdiction: The IS/MND should state that the title to all abandoned shipwrecks, archaeological sites, and historic or cultural resources on or in the tide and submerged lands of California is vested in the State and under the jurisdiction of the Commission (Pub.
Resources Code, § 6313). Commission staff requests that the City consult with Staff Attorney Jamie Garrett should any cultural resources on State lands be discovered during construction of the proposed Project.
Staff requests that the following statement be included in the IS/MND’s Best Management Practices, CR-1: “The final disposition of archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources recovered on State land under the jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission must be approved by the Commission.”
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Project. As a responsible and trustee agency, the Commission will rely on the adopted IS/MND when issuing a new lease as specified above (see Section “Commission Jurisdiction and Public Trust Lands”). We request that you consider our comments before adopting the IS/MND.
Please send electronic copies of the adopted IS/MND, Mitigation Monitoring Program, Notice of Determination, and approving resolution when they become available. Please note that federal and state laws require all government entities to improve accessibility of information technology and content by complying with established accessibility requirements. (29 U.S.C. § 794d; 36 C.F.R. § 1194.1 et seq.; Gov. Code, § 7405.) California State law prohibits State agencies from publishing on their websites content that does not comply with accessibility requirements. (Gov. Code, § 115467.) Therefore, any documents submitted to Commission staff during the processing of a lease or permit, including all CEQA documentation, must meet accessibility requirements for Commission staff to place the application on the Commission agenda.
Refer questions concerning environmental review to Christine Day, Environmental Scientist, at [email protected] or (916) 562-0027. For questions concerning archaeological or historic resources under Commission jurisdiction, please contact Jamie Garrett, Staff Attorney, at [email protected] or (916) 574-0398. For questions concerning Comment 3
Comment 4
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) City of Redding Page 4 March 3, 2023
Commission leasing jurisdiction, please contact Ninette Lee, Public Land Management Specialist, at [email protected] or (916) 574-1869.
Sincerely,
Nicole Dobroski, Chief
Division of Environmental Science,
Planning, and Management
cc: Office of Planning and Research
C. Day, Commission
J. Garrett, Commission
N. Lee, Commission
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Mar
ch 3, 2023
Amb
er Kelley
Environmental Compliance Manager,
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Mayor
Michael Dacquisto & City Councilors
City of Redding
P. O. Box 496071
Redding, CA 96049-6071
Via e
mail
Re: Tu
rtle Bay Boat Ramp Project
Dea
r Ms. Kelley, Mayor Dacquisto, and Honorable City Councilors:
The R
edding Rodeo Association (hereafter, the “Association”) has reviewed the project documents, Initial Study, and the City Public Works Department’s recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project, and hereby submits comments for the public record. The Association is an interested and affected party as the project directly impacts Association operations and events and proposes a “taking of property” on the adjoining Redding Rodeo grounds at 715 Auditorium Drive which the City currently leases to the Association.
Back
ground
Sinc
e 1948, the Association and its affiliate and subsidiary organizations have hosted an event steeped in Western Heritage and unique to Northern California. The 4-day Redding Rodeo each May is a major stop on the professional rodeo circuit, and the Rodeo was inducted to the Pro-Rodeo Hall of Fame in 2016. This year, the Rodeo will mark its 75
th anniversary. The Rodeo grounds is also used as
a livestock evacuation center during fires and offers a place for other community events such as the Benefit Motocross Races. In recent years the Association has spent an unusual amount or time and resources defending against numerous attempts to circumvent the Association’s historical use of the Rodeo Grounds.
REDDING RODEO ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 992048
Redding, CA 96009
Comment Letter B
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Th
e forward movement of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp project was surprising due to the fact the City Council just voted to spend $1.2 million to hire a firm to complete this Riverfront Specific Plan. If there is an opportunity to carve out areas from the Riverfront Specific Plan such as the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project, the Association would like the same opportunity as related to the Redding Rodeo Grounds.
Co
mments Specific to the Proposed Project
Whi
le we understand and support the need for boating and recreational access to the river, this project is overly ambitious and should be reconsidered. • Imp
act on Events and Activities. As proposed, the project will have a significant, and highly detrimental effect on the Association and other community activities that take place on the Rodeo grounds. The proposed timelines and construction activities are very problematic given the scheduling of much of the work during the time the rodeo is held each year. The entire contestant parking is marked as a part of the project on the maps included in the notice of public comment. Project plans at this time offer no reasonable and suitable mitigating solutions. • La
ck of Inclusion and Input. The Association received no notice of the release of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and heard about this from a concerned citizen. This lack of inclusion and input raises public transparency concerns.
• Cont
ractual, Legal, and Liability Issues. The project plan fails to address legal, and liability issues surrounding the City’s long standing contractual arrangement with the Association for management, operation, and use of the Rodeo grounds, which currently does not expire until 2026. The 10-month project presupposes significant construction work at the time of year when the Rodeo grounds are most utilized for events. The project also requires abandonment and/or removal of critical Rodeo grounds infrastructure. Further, it is unreasonable to assume the project can be completed in the 10-month period allotted. For example, if construction reveals previously unknown geological, hydrologic, or archaeological issues, the project could be delayed long term.
If
the Association had to cancel the Rodeo as as a result of the project it would incur a substantial financial loss, damage to goodwill and reputation, and the local charitable and community organizations and businesses who benefit financially from the events will suffer hardship and economic loss.
The
City should carefully weigh its contractual obligations, exposure to potential liability, and the economic impact upon the Rodeo and the Redding community at large, therefore, before proceeding with the project.
Comment 1
Comment 2
Comment 3
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Co
mments Specific to the Proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration Th
e Declaration’s Project Description states: “… The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached) that determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects on biological resources. …” That statement alone should signal a measured and well thought, well planned approach should be taken by the City.
The
proposed Declaration relies on City staff findings contained in the project Initial Study.
We acknowledge the work of by City staff, but based on our review, we believe both the Declaration and the initial study may contain missing, flawed, incomplete, and/or erroneous information.
Addi
tionally, the City appears to have failed to timely and adequately provide notice of findings and its intent to all interested parties, or parties mandated by law to receive notification.
Sp
ecific Concerns:
• In
complete Evaluation of Environmental Factors. Documents support questioning if the adequately evaluated or considered all the potential environmental factors involved in the project. Even to a layperson, the scope of the work described in the main project narrative clearly affects many other environmental factors beyond those identified by the City’s Public Works Department (see table below), yet those were not addressed in the Declaration and Study or described as mostly as “… less than significant impact”.
City of Redding Turtle Bay Boat Ramp Project Initial Study February 2023 Pag
e two of the Declaration states: “… 1) Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. …”
Comment 4
Comment 5
Comment 6
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Common sense dictates that no reasonable person could believe that the large excavation, subsequent fill, in-water work, construction of a berm and ramp, infrastructure removal or re- location, and expansion of parking, trails, and recreational areas, together with the increased traffic and use of the new boat ramp and recreation area upon completion would not greatly impact area environmental factors. We need not list those other factors; they are reflected in the table above.
• Hydr
ological Concerns. If there is a constant with rivers and waterways, it is change. Rivers change character along their courses and over time; what happens on one river segment affects everything downstream. It is irresponsible for the City to assert that the proposed project will have little impact on the river without the benefit of a detailed environmental impact assessment.
• Wa
ter Quality and Pollution Concerns. The proposed project will generate increased boating and shoreline activities, increasing the potential to introduce water pollutants such as petroleum hydrocarbons (e.g. fuel and oil), toxic metals (e.g. anti-foulants and hull/boat maintenance chemicals), other liquid and solid wastes, including debris, litter, pet wastes and sewage.
Boat ramps and launches can easily alter habitats at a site. Shoreline vegetation may be reduced at some locations, and bottom sediments may be stirred up more frequently with boating activity. The river at that location already experiences moderate turbidity and sedimentation according to the EPA
1 and increased boating use may exacerbate the issue. The Turtle Bay Boat ramp currently experiences 1,500 to 5,300 day uses per year, and expanding the facility will only increase its impact on the river and local roads, residents, and other uses.
Th
e project would require significant amount of concrete in the dam, berm, and above water hardscape surfaces. Nationwide studies show that city streams and rivers carry dissolving concrete constituent elements, including calcium and carbonate minerals, which flow into urban waterways and affect their pH, or acidity, and therefore their ability to sustain aquatic life. 2 The Turtle Bay boat ramp already lies within an area designed by the EPA to contain imperiled species and habitats.
• Ad
equate Required Notification Under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. The Clean Water Act requires authorization from the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Corps of Engineers (USACE), for the discharge of dredged or fill material into all waters of the United States, including wetlands. The USACE Sacramento District Office has jurisdiction over the Sacramento River at the Turtle Bay ramp. Neither the Declaration or the Initial Study reflect or infer that the City consulted with the USACE in the preparation of the study or the Declaration. It seems reasonable to do so at the initial project stages, since the USACE will be the permitting agency for the Clean Water Act permits necessary to the project; that agency could likely offer comment and key advice.
1 US Environmental Protection Agency EnviroAtlas
2 N ational Science Foundation. “A river runs through it: U.S. cities' waterways show consistent patterns of evolution; Urban waters record salt in food, cement in sidewalks. September 10, 2014 Comment 7
Comment 8
Comment 9
Comment 10
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
• California Environmental Quality Act Compliance (CEQA). CEQA is a statutory scheme requiring cities and other public agencies to consider the environmental consequences of their actions before approving plans or policies or otherwise committing to a course of action on a project. By proposing to adopt a Mitigative Negative Declaration for the project, the City has acknowledged the project is not statutorily or categorically exempt from CEQA compliance.
CEQA compliance must occur before a public agency approves a project. The term “approves” however, does not mean final approval. Instead, “approval” refers to “the decision by a public agency which commits the agency to a definite course of action in regard to a project intended to be carried out by any person.” Adopting the Mitigative Negative Declaration certainly commits the City to a definite course of action.
In opting to seek a Mitigative Negative Declaration for this project, the City is attempting to avoid preparing a CEQA Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Initial Study, and the issues raised in this letter, are substantial evidence and likely sufficient to meet the “fair argument standard” which triggers an EIR.
3 CEQA’s purpose of informed decision making and
preference for environmental decision making have set a low threshold for requiring an EIR.
The low threshold has been upheld repeatedly by California courts.4 Eve
n though conditions or mitigation measures are introduced in a Mitigative Negative Declaration, they do not preclude the need to prepare an EIR if information meeting the fair argument standard discussed above is introduced into the record.5 Additionally, we note that CEQA requires consideration of project alternatives6 if an EIR is required; something that the City’s proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration apparently seeks to avoid. We believe the proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration contains flaws in that it presupposes deferred mitigative measures in the course of the project, which are generally impermissible under CEQA.
We
believe use of a Mitigative Negative Declaration by the City is inappropriate for this project and violates the spirit, if not the law, with respect to CEQA applicability. 3 “If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report shall be prepared.” Pub. Res. Code section 21080(d)
4 See Citizens Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley (1990) 222 Cal. App. 3d 748, 754; Citizens of Lake Murray Area Assn. v. City Council (1982) 129 Cal. App. 3d 436, 440; Mejia v. City of Los Angeles, (2005) 130 Cal. App. 4th 322, 332.
5 See Pub. Res. Code section 21064.5; CEQA Guidelines section 15070(b)(2). 6 CEQA Guidelines section 15130
Comment 11
Comment 12
Comment 13
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
Summary
As
stated previously, the Association sympathizes with the City’s desire to improve boating and recreational activities on the Sacramento River. However, the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp project as proposed presents many as yet unresolved issues and challenges. Not all of them have been raised in this letter; we have attempted to point out only a few salient issues.
In
our opinion, approval of the proposed Mitigative Negative Declaration by the City Council at this time would be highly premature, and the City Council should return it to the City’s Public Works Department for additional research and further review while all factors of the Turtle Bay Boat Ramp are reviewed and approved.
Tha
nk you for the opportunity to submit comment and present our concerns. We also believe improvements can be made to the existing Turtle Bay Boat ramp while mitigating their effect on the historic heritage of the Redding and the millions of dollars in economic impact our brings to the Redding Community. The Association also wishes to express its desire for cooperation in present and future projects to our mutual benefit and for the residents of the City of Redding and Shasta County.
Si
ncerely,
Ci
ndy Schonholtz, General Manager
On behalf of the
The Redding Rodeo Association Board of Directors
Comment 14
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Comment Letter C
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Northern Region
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 96001
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
March 3, 2023
Amber Kelley, Environmental Compliance Manager
City of Redding
Public Works Engineering Division
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding CA 96001
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF TURTLE BAY BOAT RAMP PROJECT, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER 2023020064, SHASTA COUNTY
Dear Amber Kelley,
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has reviewed the draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND), dated February 2023, for the above referenced project which proposes to widen an existing boat ramp, add a boating access beach for non-motorized boating vessels, add parking stalls, add an ADA-compliant restroom, add a drinking fountain, add a small overlook area with picnic tables, replace and extend a wastewater line, and extend the Sacramento River Trail (Project). CDFW’s review of this Project is pursuant to our role as the State’s trustee agency for fish and wildlife resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq. Additionally, as a State responsible agency, CDFW administers the California Endangered Species Act and other provisions of the Fish and Game Code that conserve the State’s fish and wildlife public trust resources.
CDFW acknowledges that the City of Redding appropriately analyzed potential impacts to biological resources which includes a Biological Resources Report, waters delineation, seasonally appropriate botanical surveys and the preparation of a Biological Assessment for listed salmonids. CDFW concurs with the avoidance and minimization measures, as listed in the ISMND, to minimize and/or avoid potential impacts to biological resources due to the Project. Therefore, CDFW has no comment.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Project to assist the City of Redding in adequately analyzing and minimizing impacts to biological resources.
Comment Letter D
Comment 1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp) Amber Kelley
City of Redding
March 3, 2023
If you h
ave any questions, please contact Erika Iacona, Environmental Scientist, by email at [email protected].
Sincerel
y,
Curt Babcock for
Tina Bartlett, Regional Manager
Northern Region
ec: State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Erika Iacon
a
[email protected]
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4-4-2023 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution and Ratify Grant Application for Turtle Bay Boat Ramp)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Sch edule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project, awarded to VSS International, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,541,486.85.
Fiscal Impact
Streets Division funding in the amount of $3,200,000 was approved for this project for Fiscal Year 2 025-26. The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration, is $2,541,486.85.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not accept the project as satisf actorily complete, and advise staff on how to proceed.
Background
VSS International, Inc. has completed all items of work on the Cape Seal 2025 Project as of November 7, 2025, which was within the contract time frame. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date of November 7, 2025, and the Public Works Department subsequently filed a notice of completion with the County.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 155
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project Page 2
At its meeting of July 15, 2025, the Council awarded a construction contract to VSS International, I nc. of West Sacramento, California for $2,272,120 and approved a $230,000 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $280,000 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $54,000 for project development costs, and the City Manag er was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000, for a total authorized amount of $2,886,120. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services. During construction, there were three change order s in the amount of $56,231.08, leaving a balance of $173,768.92 in the contingency fund. The final project cost was $2,541,486.85.
Cost Summary(1)
Item Initial
Authorized
Increase
Amount
Final
Authorized
Actual Amount
Project Development(2) $ 54 $ 54 $ 54 Construction Contract $ 2,272 $ 2,272 $ 2,272 Construction
Contingency
$ 230 $ 230 $ 56(3) Contract
Admin/Inspection/Testin
g
$ 280 $ 280 $ 159 Add’l City Manager
Auth.
$ 50 $ 50 $ 0
TOTAL PROJECT
COSTS
$ 2,886 $ 2,886 $ 2,541
TOTAL PROJECT
BUDGET
$ 3,200 $ 3,200 $ 3,200 Notes:
(1) Figures shown in thousands.
(2) Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (3) During construction, there were three change orders in the amount of $56,231.08
The project involved applying a polymer modified rubberized chip seal followed by micro - surfacing on approximately 274,900 square yards of existing streets as well as removing and applying traffic stripe and markings.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On July 15, 2025, Council determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Section 150301 – Existing Facilities, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Cape Seal Project 2025 Location Map
Previous Staff Report Award of Bid, July 15, 2025
Packet Pg. 156
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Cape Seal Project 2025 Location Map (4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5593 Cape Seal 2025:
(1) Award to VSS International, Inc. in the amount of $2,272,120; (2) Approve an additional $2 80,000 to cover the cost of contract administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $230,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Approve $54,000 for project development costs;
(5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases, in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts, up to a total of $50,000; and (6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities.
Fiscal Impact
The Cape Seal 2025 Project (Project) is funded by the City of Redding’s (City) Streets Division and is included in its approved budget for Fiscal Year 2025 -26. Project cost components are estimated, and some shifting of the funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.
Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 54,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 2,502,120
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 280,000
Additional City Manager Authority $ 50,000
Total Project Costs $ 2,886,120
Project Budget $ 3,200,000
MEETING DATE: July 15, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Previous Staff Report Award of Bid, July 15, 2025 (4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project) Report to Redding City Council July 3, 2025
Re: 4.11(c)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to award the project, in which case, the streets will continue to deteriorate and require roadway reconstruction.
Background/Analysis
CAPE seal roadway surface treatments extend the life of wo rn pavements by combining a chip seal with slurry seal treatments. The City has utilized this method to successfully preserve residential streets since 2008. This project includes the pavement preservation treatment in various neighborhoods in Redding (see location map).
Attached is a tabulation of the three bids opened on May 29, 2025. The low bid in the amount of $2,272,120 was received from VSS International, Inc., of West Sacramento, California. The engineer’s estimate was $2,420,081. Total project de velopment costs for this project are estimated to be $54,000. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (design and construction support).
Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines , pursuant to Section 15301. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities. The project will extend the life of the existing pavement and will result in no expansion of use. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources and will not have a significant effect on biological or cultural resources such as threatened or endangered spe cies or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. No further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Location Map
^Bid Tab
^Notice of Exemption
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Previous Staff Report Award of Bid, July 15, 2025 (4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Previous Staff Report Award of Bid, July 15, 2025 (4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project) BID TABULATION FOR:
CAPE SEAL 2025
Bid Schedule No.: 5593
ENGINEER'S EST
1/0/1900 UNIT UNIT UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $220,000.00 $220,000.00 $210,210.72 $210,210.72 $164,000.00 $164,000.00 3 Polymer Modified Asphalt Rubber SY 274900 $5.10 $1,401,990.00 $4.50 $1,237,050.00 $4.70 $1,292,030.00 4 Micro-Surfacing (Type II) SY 274900 $2.35 $646,015.00 $2.50 $687,250.00 $2.73 $750,477.00 5 Adjust Water Valve EA 33 $1,500.00 $49,500.00 $1,080.00 $35,640.00 $1,000.00 $33,000.00 6 Adjust Manhole EA 20 $1,400.00 $28,000.00 $1,620.00 $32,400.00 $1,500.00 $30,000.00 7 Adjust Monument EA 14 $1,500.00 $21,000.00 $1,620.00 $22,680.00 $750.00 $10,500.00 8 Remove Pavement Markings SF 1726 $4.50 $7,767.00 $8.64 $14,912.64 $4.50 $7,767.00 9 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (6") LF 9100 $1.50 $13,650.00 $1.08 $9,828.00 $2.00 $18,200.00 10 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF 1725 $13.00 $22,425.00 $8.64 $14,904.00 $12.00 $20,700.00 11 Pavement Marker EA 526 $9.00 $4,734.00 $8.64 $4,544.64 $8.00 $4,208.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $2,420,081.00 $2,272,120.00 $2,338,382.00 Average
UNIT UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $7,566.67 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $152,000.00 $152,000.00 $175,403.57 3 Polymer Modified Asphalt Rubber
(PMAR) Chip Seal SY 274900 $5.52 $1,517,448.00 $4.91
4 Micro-Surfacing (Type II) SY 274900 $2.74 $753,226.00 $2.66 5 Adjust Water Valve EA 33 $1,250.00 $41,250.00 $1,110.00 6 Adjust Manhole EA 20 $2,000.00 $40,000.00 $1,706.67
7 Adjust Monument EA 14 $1,250.00 $17,500.00 $1,206.67
8 Remove Pavement Markings SF 1726 $4.75 $8,198.50 $5.96 9 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (6") LF 9100 $2.10 $19,110.00 $1.73 10 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF 1725 $12.70 $21,907.50 $11.11 11 Pavement Marker EA 526 $8.45 $4,444.70 $8.36
Average Bid
TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $2,587,584.70 $2,399,362.23
VSS International Inc
American Pavement Systems
Inc
Pavement Coatings Co
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 161
Attachment: Previous Staff Report Award of Bid, July 15, 2025 (4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Previous Staff Report Award of Bid, July 15, 2025 (4.11(a)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5593, Cape Seal 2025 Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City of Redding Water Utility to purchase a spare filter underdrain system for the Foothill Water Treatment Plant at a net cost of $238,898.30, including applicable taxes and delivery.
Fiscal Impact
The $238,898.30 purchase of a spare filter underdrain system for the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (WTP) will be funded by the City of Redding’s (City) Water Utility Division. The Water Utility’s Foothill Treatment Plant Improvements b udget for Fiscal Year 2026 is $6.21 million, with over $5.5 million remaining. The remaining budget is sufficient to cover this purchase, and it will not affect other future planned maintenance or operations for the remaining fiscal year .
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize this purchase and provide alternate direction to staff. However, not purchasing the spare underdrain would increase the risk of an extended outage and reduced production capacity at the Foothill WTP if an existing filter underdrain fails. This could reduce system reliability during peak demand periods and impact service to the City’s water customers.
Background/Analysis
The Water Utility treats raw drinking water through filtration and disinfection at two WTPs :
Foothill and Buckeye. The Foothill WTP provides the City’s largest and primary water supply during average and peak demand periods. During high -demand periods, it supplies more than half of the City’s water by treating water pumpe d from the Sacramento River via Pump House 1.
The Foothill WTP is located off Foothill Boulevard on the west side of the City. It was originally constructed in 1920, with incremental upgrades completed through the 1940s and major improvements completed in 1959 and 1981.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Authorize the Purchase of a Spare Filter Underdrain for the Foothill Water Treatment Plant
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 163
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant Page 2
The filtration system at the Foothill WTP consists of four constant -rate, dual -media gravity filters. The filter underdrains in these four filters were replaced in 2006 with systems manufactured by Roberts Filter Group, similar to those previously installed at the Buckeye WTP.
However, the plastic components in the Roberts Filter systems at the Buckeye WTP failed in most filters less than 20 years after installation. As a result, all underdrain systems at the Buckeye WTP have since been repl aced through capital improvement projects with stainless steel systems manufactured by AWI.
Based on the City’s experience with Roberts Filter underdrain failures at the Buckeye WTP, staff has concerns regarding the long -term reliability of the underdrain s currently installed at the Foothill WTP. Failure of one of the four filters would reduce plant production capacity by 25 percent. Such a reduction could significantly impair the Water Utility’s ability to meet peak summer demand and maintain required fire flow capacity.
In addition, the lead time for a replacement underdrain system is up to 30 weeks from the date of order. During that time, the affected filter would remain out of service, limiting water production capacity.
Due to these reliability conc erns and extended procurement timelines, the Water Utility requests authorization to purchase one spare underdrain system for storage at the Foothill WTP. If a failure occurs, an emergency replacement project could be completed within a few weeks, rather than leaving the filter out of service for several months while awaiting manufacture and delivery of the replacement underdrain . Maintaining a spare on -site would substantially reduce outage duration and operational risk.
A major capital improvement projec t for upgrades to the Foothill WTP is included in the Water Utility’s Capital Improvement Plan (Project FWTP -02), with construction anticipated in 2028 .
Replacement of all four filter underdrains is planned as part of that project. If the spare underdrain is not needed prior to that project’s construction, then the City will furnish it to the contractor for installation, reducing project costs and avoiding contractor markup on these materials. Because the spare underdrain would be constructed of stainless s teel, there are no concerns regarding deterioration or corrosion during extended storage.
Staff has been satisfied with the durability and performance of the AWI stainless -steel underdrain and air -scour systems at the Buckeye WTP. On June 4, 2024, Council approved a sole-source designation for AWI filter underdrain systems at the City’s WTPs. AWI authorizes only one sales representative in California - Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., to sell its equipment. Staff has reviewed the attached quote from Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. and finds the pricing reasonable and consistent with costs for the recent Buckeye WTP underdrain replacements.
Environmental Review
The purchase of equipment is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Packet Pg. 164
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote
June 4, 2024 Staff Report
Packet Pg. 165
Quote # 121625.AW.RM.R2
February 6, 2026
To: Redding, City of
Attn: Jim Morrison
[email protected]
530-225-4081
Re: AWI UNDER DRAIN
VIA: EMAIL
Bid Date: N/A
Dear Kurt,
We are pleased to offer the following for your consideration:
ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE
1 1 One (1) AWI Under Drain System per the attached
Manufacturers Scope Letter. Please refer to attachment for details and terms.
$222,749.00
2 1 SALES TAX
(Shasta County 7.25%)
$222,749.00 X .0725
$16,149.30
3 1 FREIGHT INCLUDED
$INCL
TOTAL $238,898.30
NOTE:
GENERAL NOTES:
1. No taxes included in above pricing. Prices quoted are FOB Factory, FFA.
2. Pricing valid for thirty (30) days from date of bid.
3. Proposal subject to GMI Terms & Conditions attached and/or terms and conditions of individual companies quoted.
4. If this proposal makes reference to certain section numbers in the specifications, these are listed for reference only. We will not be responsible for furnishing all the equipment in these sections, but only that equipment which is specifically listed in our proposal; nor will we furnish any items of equipment which are omitted from the engineer’s drawings or specifications unless specifically listed in our proposal.
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Quote # 121625.AW.RM.R2
5. It is the contractor’s responsibility to thoroughly review the individual supplier’s scope letters to ensure that they are in compliance with the specifications and all addenda. Neither Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., nor their suppliers will be held responsible for any deficiencies between the manufacturer’s proposal and the specifications, including all addenda.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to quote you on this project. If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact our office at (714) 236-6070.
Respectfully yours,
GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC.
Ryan McCloskey
Sales Engineer
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Quote # 121625.AW.RM.R2
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
1. ACCEPTANCE. This proposal is submitted to Purchaser subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
There are no agreements or representations, verbal or otherwise, outside of this proposal. Upon the acceptance hereof by Purchaser by signing an acceptance copy of this proposal and returning the same to Seller and upon execution of this proposal by an authorized representative of Seller, this proposal shall become a binding contract
2. DELIVERIES. GIERLICH -MITCHELL, Inc. shall not be liable for delays in delivery due to fire, flood, natural causes, labor trouble (including strikes, slowdowns and lockouts), war, Government regulation, riot, civil disorders, interruption of or delay in transportation, power failure, inability to obtain materials and supplies, accidents, acts of God, or any other cause beyond Seller’s reasonable control. Please let us know the delivery date required for this equipment.
We will process this order using all means possible to insure “on time” delivery. Any information regarding delays in your schedule that will affect our equipment, must be made available to us. In most instances, our factories can delay shipment of equipment within reasonable limits to meet a revised schedule. Job delay information not passed on to us in time for us to reschedule delivery will not be considered sufficient cause to delay payment to us. If shipment is delayed at request of Purchaser or by Governmental actions, payment becomes due when the factory is ready to make shipment.
3. PAYMENT. Terms are 30% upon submittal approval, 70% Net 30 days from date of shipment invoice. Interest charges of 1.5% per month will be added to any past due invoices. Seller may ship on a “when ready” basis and partial invoice that equipment shipped. Partial invoices are bound by the same terms and conditions as those invoices submitted upon complete shipment of equipment.
4. BACKCHARGES not authorized by GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. written purchase order will not be honored.
5. RETENTIONS not previously approved in writing by GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. will not be honored.
6. RESPONSIBILITY. GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. shall not be responsible for damage to equipment if misused, stored or improperly installed. GIERLICH -MITCHELL, INC. SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL,
LIQUIDATED OR OTHER SPECIAL DAMAGES, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES FOR THE PURPOS ES OF
THIS AGREEMENT SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, LOSS OF USE, INCOME OR PROFIT, OR
LOSS OF DAMAGE TO PROPERTY (INCLUDING, BUT WITHOUT LIMITATION, PRODUCTS
MANUFACTURED, PROCESSED OR TRANSPORTED BY THE USE OF THE EQUIPMENT) OCCASIONED BY
OR ARISING OUT OF THE OPERATION, USE, INSTALLATION, REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE EQUIPMENT OR OTHERWISE. Breach of any term or condition of this contract shall not be deemed to invalidate the remainder of this contract.
7. WARRANTY. For benefit of the original user, GIERLICH -MITCHELL, INC., warrants all new equipment to be free from defects in material and workmanship; and will replace or repair, F.O.B. at its factories or other location designated by it, any part or parts returned to it which GIERLICH -MITCHELL, Inc. examination shall show to have failed under normal use and service by the original user within one year following initial shipment to the Purchaser.
This warranty does not cover parts damaged by maintenanc e, installation, modification or adjustment. Such repair or replacement shall be free of charge for items except for those items that are consumable and normally replaced during maintenance.
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Quote # 121625.AW.RM.R2
THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY MADE BY GIERLICH -MITCHELL, INC. AND ACCEPTED BY
PURCHASER IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER WRITTEN, ORAL, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY.
This warranty shall not apply to equipment or parts thereof which have been altered or repaired without GIERLICH - MITCHELL, INC. authorization or damaged by improper installation or application, or subject to misuse, abuse, neglect or accident. This warranty applies only to equipment manufactured and sold by GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. In cases where equipment is manufactured by others, the manufacturer’s warranty shall take precedence.
8. TAXES. Prices are exclusive of all taxes, federal, state, local of any kind of nature.
9. PRICE PROTECTION. Unless otherwise set forth herein, prices are firm based upon the following conditions:
a. Receipt of a valid order within thirty (30) days from date or proposal. b. Receipt of drawings and specifications necessary to proceed within one week of purchase order. c. Receipt of customer’s complete written approval and release for production within four weeks after approval drawings are submitted by GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC.
Prices will be increased a maximum or one percent per month for any additional time required by contractor.
10. TRANSPORTATION. Unless otherwise set forth herein, all prices are F.O.B. our factories with full freight allowed. The consignee must report all claims for damages in transit to the carrier.
11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Purchaser shall be solely responsible for securing any necessary permits under and for compliance with all safety, health, sanitation and other laws, ordinances and regulations in connection with the installation and operation of the equipment.
12. INDEMNIFICATION. It is understood that Seller has relied upon data furnished by and on behalf of Purchaser with respect to the safety aspects of the equipment and that is Purchaser’s responsibility to assure that the equipment will, when installed and put in use, be in c ompliance with safety requirements fixed by law and otherwise legally adequate to safeguard against injuries or damage to persons or property. Purchaser hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Seller, its’ agents and employees, against any and all losses, costs, damages, claims, liabilities or expenses, including but not limited to reasonably attorney’s fees arising out of or use or operation of the same, except claims for repair or replacement of defective parts as provided in Paragraph 7 hereof.
13. RETURN GOODS. Goods may not be returned without previous written permission. Returned material must be sent prepaid and is subject to a re-stocking charge.
14. CANCELLATION. The purchaser may cancel his order only upon written notice and payment of reasonable cancellation charges, taking into account expenses, commitments already made, and anticipated profit.
15. TITLE. Title to equipment specified herein, and to any and all additions and accessories thereto and substitutions therefore, shall remain with Seller until the purchase price thereof is paid in full.
16. LIEN INFORMATION. Please provide if applicable.
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Quote # 121625.AW.RM.R2
This signed acceptance of th is quotation constitutes a contract and order to purchase in accordance with all Terms and Conditions referred to herein. Buyers purchase order is acceptable, providing purchase order references Terms and Conditions contained herein.
Accepted:
Accepted: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc
Signature:
Signature:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
AWI….Leaders in Filter Optimization
473 West Universal Circle
Sandy, Utah 84070
Phone: (801) 566-1700
Fax: (801) 566-1722
January 16, 2026
To whom it may concern,
Please be advised that AWI has appointed Gierlich – Mitchell, Inc. as the solely authorized representative for the sale of AWI Phoenix™ Lateral Underdrain Systems for the governmental and municipal markets for all counties in the state of California.
All inquiries for filter underdrains should be forwarded to:
Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc.
135 South State College Blvd. Suite 226
Brea, CA 92821
p- 714-236-6070
f - 714-236-6080
www.gierlich-mitchell.com
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Perry Pelitera
Director of Sales & Marketing
Anthratech U.S., Inc (AWI)
473 W Universal Circle, Sandy, UT 84070
D: 801.666.7075 | C: 801.819.2198
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI US
473 West Universal Circle
Sandy, UT 84070
801.566.1700
www.awifilter.com
AWI….Leaders in Filter Optimization
December 16, 2025
Kurt Maire
City of Redding
Associate Civil Engineer
777 Cypress Ave
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: AWI PhoenixTM Lateral Underdrain Systems for the Foothill Water Treatment Plant – Single Filter
Dear Kurt:
As the manufacturer of Phoenix Underdrain Systems, Anthratech U.S. Inc. (AWI) is pleased to offer for your consideration its stainless steel filter underdrains for inclusion in the project you are currently pursuing.
AWI prides itself on the quality of the products we offer and the level of service we provide to all of our customers including Consulting Engineers, Owners, and Contractors. A key attribute of Phoenix Underdrain Systems is the speed and ease with which t hey can be installed. If we can do more to help you understand exactly how installation is accomplished and facilitate your estimating process, we would welcome the opportunity.
During the bidding process, AWI will be represented locally by Ryan McCloskey with contact information shown below:
Gierlich - Mitchell, Inc.
135 South State College Blvd
Suite 226
Brea, CA 92821
Telephone: 714.236.6070
E-mail: [email protected]
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
AWI….Leaders in Filter Optimization
We look forward to supporting you in making this a successful project – both a financial success as you construct and close out the project and as an installation.
Should you have any questions or concerns regarding our offering, please contact us at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
Perry D. Pelitera
AWI Director of Sales & Marketing
cc: Ryan McCloskey/Gierlich – Mitchell, Inc
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Proposal Contents1
AWI Phoenix Filter Underdrain Systems ................................................. 1 Proprietary and Confidential Information ............................................... 1 Item 1 – AWI Phoenix Filter Underdrains ................................................ 2 AWI Phoenix Filter Underdrain Scope of Supply ............................................. 2 Items Furnished by Others and not by AWI ............................................ 3 Clarifications / Exceptions / Addenda ..................................................... 3 AWI Price Information .............................................................................. 4 Offer Pricing ........................................................................................................ 4 Firm Price Bid ..................................................................................................... 4 Taxes ................................................................................................................... 4 Payment Terms ................................................................................................... 4
1 Note that all page numbers in this Table of Contents are hyperlinks in .pdf format. The reader can go to the desired location in this document by simply clicking on the page number. From most pages in the document, the reader can get back to the Table of Contents by clicking on the hyperlink entitled “Contents” at the top of the page.
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
Limit of Liability ........................................................................................ 5 AWI Project Schedule ............................................................................... 5 Information Provided by AWI ................................................................... 5 Submittal Information ........................................................................................ 5 Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manuals .......................................... 5 AWI Services ............................................................................................. 6 Installation and Commissioning Supervision .................................................. 6 Customer Service ............................................................................................... 6 AWI Standard Five (5) Year Warranty ...................................................... 8
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
1 AWI OFFERING
AWI PHOENIX FILTER UNDERDRAIN SYSTEMS
AWI has been building its unique filter underdrain systems for installation in new filters and retrofit applications for more than 30 years. AWI uses a combination of design principles developed from decades of field experience along with the latest innovations in granular media filtration technology. The product offered in this proposal has been proven in hundreds of operating installations.
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
The attached document contains proprietary and confidential information and is submitted under a confidential relationship for the sole purpose of responding to a request to solve various process and operational problems.
By accepting this document, the recipient agrees:
• it will not disclose to third parties or use any drawings, specifications, designs, processes or information supplied by AWI in any manner detrimental to the interests of AWI,
• any special features peculiar to this design and information gained as a result of this document shall be treated as confidential and shall be the property of AWI and will not be incorporated in whole or in part in other projects unless recipient obtains written permission from AWI to do so,
• not to copy in whole or in part nor reveal its contents in any manner or for any other purpose except for the purpose stated herein,
• the foregoing applies, without limitation, to all documents prepared by AWI in connection with this submission and the recipient acknowledges this document involves confidential, proprietary rights of AWI and all design, manufacturing, reproduction, use and sale rights regarding same as expressly reserved.
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
2 ITEM 1 – AWI PHOENIX FILTER UNDERDRAINS
AWI proposes to furnish filter underdrain systems suitable for installation in one (1) filters with the filter having a single cell. The filter is 54 feet wide by 26 feet long.
AWI Phoenix Filter Underdrain Scope of Supply
The following items are included as part of the filter underdrain system for each filter cell:
• Low Profile Laterals constructed of 304 stainless steel necessary to form a complete underdrain system
• Integral flume seal plates (note that an end plug will need to be poured in the flume) • An air header constructed of schedule 10 304L stainless steel pipe to deliver air for air scouring to the underdrain laterals
• Nipple and hose connections including 316 stainless steel hose clamps for each underdrain lateral
• Power wire brush cleaning of all fabricated stainless steel components • All necessary 316 stainless steel anchors with appropriate hold down clamps • All necessary HILTI adhesive for setting the anchors
• All necessary HILTI applicator disposable nozzles
• All necessary hole brushes with brush handles
• All necessary 316 stainless steel assembly hardware
• All necessary gaskets – cut to length (slight excess) • All necessary sealant - Sikaflex (installer will need a caulking gun) • Shims necessary to level the underdrain system
• Fastener overage amounting to 2% of each type of fastener The following are provided under this proposal item:
• One (1) HILTI epoxy applicator
• Manuals for installation, operation, and maintenance
• Service for installation supervision and commissioning (refer to the “ Installation and Commissioning Supervision” section of this proposal) • Freight to the jobsite – terms are FOB jobsite
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
3 ITEMS FURNISHED BY OTHERS AND NOT BY AWI
Unless specifically noted in this proposal as offered by AWI and specifically included by item name in a purchase order tendered to AWI in response to this offering , AWI does not include:
• Engineering of any kind not directly related to design of an AWI Product • Concrete design, concrete repair, concrete work, end plugs, wall port plugs, grout or grout strips, filter media, troughs, pumps, blowers, painting, piping, valves, instrumentation, controls, wiring, consumables, tools or equipment required for installation, disinfection chemicals or water for commissioning; • Unloading, anchor bolt pull testing, installation labor or service of any kind other than as noted in this proposal.
CLARIFICATIONS / EXCEPTIONS / ADDENDA
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
4 AWI PRICE INFORMATION
Offer Pricing
Pricing for the AWI offering for this project is presented in the table below:
AWI Pricing
Item Description Price
1 AWI Phoenix Filter Underdrain System $
Firm Price Bid
The prices submitted in this proposal are based upon receipt of a purchase order acceptable to AWI on or before January 15, 2026 and customer acceptance of shipment in accordance with the shipment schedule presented in this proposal . If the above indicated order date is exceeded, prices and shipping dates are subject to review and adjustment.
Stainless steel costs are subject to rapid escalation at times; therefore, AWI reserves the right to adjust its pricing accordingly in the event there is a sharp increase in quoted costs for stainless steel in the U.S. market.
Taxes
Sales or use taxes are not included in this offer price. Any such taxes incurred by AWI, or required to be passed on to AWI by any of its subcontractors, will be added to the previously quoted price to arrive at the total sales price. AWI will advise Purchaser of the amount of such taxes as soon as they are det ermined at which time Purchaser shall immediately provide AWI with a change order to reflect the taxes being added to arrive at the total sales price.
Payment Terms
The total amount of the order shall be payable as follows:
• 30% upon submittal of approval drawings
• 70% upon shipment of equipment
All invoices are due and payable within thirty (30) days of the date rendered. In the event AWI is not paid within the specified time frame due to anything other than performance by AWI, AWI reserves the right to charge a penalty of 2% per month on the unpaid balance.
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
5 LIMIT OF LIABILITY
AWI’s aggregate liability to the purchaser shall not exceed the total of the amounts paid to AWI in relation to this proposal. In no event shall either party be liable to the other party for indirect, special, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages.
AWI PROJECT SCHEDULE
The projected AWI schedule for this project is:
• Preparation of submittal information in accordance with this proposal – 6 to 8 weeks
• Scheduled block of time allotted for review and return of submittal information – 2 weeks
• Scheduled block of time allotted for addressing any issues raised during the initial submittal process – 2 weeks
• Time for fabrication and shipment leaving the AWI fabrication facility – 12 to 16 weeks
AWI will finalize its shipping schedule in conjunction with the purchaser at the time of order acceptance. Should AWI subsequently be asked to delay shipment beyond the agreed upon shipping schedule, an amount equal to 1% of the unpaid purchase order balance per month of delay will be added to the total purchase amount.
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AWI
Submittal Information
General arrangement drawings with accompanying information necessary to facilitate designer approval of AWI Products offered will be provided within the number of weeks shown in this proposal under the heading “AWI Project Schedule” following receipt at the AWI offices of a written purchase order reflecting an agreement between the Purchaser and AWI.
Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manuals
An electronic version in Adobe .pdf format of the appropriate AWI Installation, Operation, and Maintenance Manual including project-specific information such as erection drawings will be sent to the jobsite prior to shipment of AWI Products.
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
6 AWI SERVICES
Installation and Commissioning Supervision
AWI will supply a Field Service Technician who is a direct employee of AWI to provide instruction, installation supervision, and commissioning oversight for AWI Products as noted in the table below:
AWI Supervision
Item Supervision Days Supervision Trips
1 * *
Supervision days are calculated on a portal-to-portal basis from AWI premises to the job site and return. The supervision time shown is commensurate with the supervision time normally required by a competent construction crew for installation and startup of AWI Phoenix Filter Underdrains. Adequate notice of a need for supervision defined as two weeks’ notice must be provided to insure availability of qualified supervision personnel .
AWI guarantees the personnel sent to perform supervision are fully qualified and a direct employee of AWI but cannot guarantee that the same Field Service Technician will always be available.
*AWI will need to supervise installation and commission the project before any warranty certificate can be issued. Installation without AWI presence will VOID any warranty.
Customer Service
AWI will provide upon request additional services of experienced factory trained personnel for construction/installation consultation, mechanical inspection, operator training, and equipment start-up. Requested service will be billed at the rate in effect at the time that service is performed plus travel and accommodation expenses.
Billing rates for service in effect as of January 1, 2023 are:
AWI Service Rates
Circumstances Rate
Monday through Friday $1450/day
Overtime 1½ times the above rate
Saturday 1½ times the above rate
Sunday 2 times the above rate
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) AWI Proposal
Foothill WTP
Proposal Revision Number: 7
Contents
AWI PROPOSAL
7 The above rates are subject to adjustment without notice to conform to the rates in effect at the time the work is performed.
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
AWI WARRANTY
AWI STANDARD FIVE (5) YEAR WARRANTY
For the benefit of the original user, Anthratech U.S. Inc. (dba AWI) warrants all new equipment manufactured by AWI which has been installed in accordance with AWI’s instruction to be free from defects in material and workmanship; and will replace or repair any parts which examination shall show to have fai led under normal use and service by the original user within the earlier of 60 months from installation or 66 months from initial shipment. Such repair or replacement shall be free of charge except for those parts that are consumable and normally replaced during maintenance. Such consumables shall be subject to pro -rata charge based upon AWI’s estimate of the percentage of normal service life realized from the part. AWI’s obligation under this warranty is conditioned upon its receiving prompt notice of claimed defects which shall in no event be later than thirty (30) days following first knowledge of the claimed defects.
This warranty shall not apply to equipment or parts thereof which have been altered or repaired by parties other than AWI without AWI’s prior written authorization. Neither does this warranty apply if the equipment or parts have been damaged by improper installation, application, erosion or corrosion of any sort, or subjected to misuse, abuse, neglect or accident, including but not limited to water hammer events or differential pressures in excess of 10 psi. The original user must be able to demonstrate operation within warranty limits by continuously monitoring and recording system pressures. AWI makes no warranty with respect to parts, accessories, or components manufactured by others; the warranty applicable to such items is that offered by their respective manufacturer.
In the event of a suspected defect, AWI must be allowed to examine the claim before action is taken to remove any media or parts. In the event of a defect covered under the terms of this warranty, AWI shall cover the cost of the following items:
─ movement or removal of filter media necessary to repair or replace the defective parts; ─ removal, repair or replacement, and reinstallation of any defective parts manufactured by AWI; ─ reinstallation of any filter media removed for the purpose of the covered warranty work.
The user will be responsible for providing a nearby laydown area for the storage of filter media removed during any warranty related activities as well as any utilities required to perform the warranty work.
THIS WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE STATED REMEDIES, IS EXPRESSLY MADE BY AWI AND
ACCEPTED BY PURCHASER AND ORIGINAL USER IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, INCLUDING
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE WHETHER WRITTEN, ORAL, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY. AWI NEITHER ASSUMES NOR AUTHORIZES
ANY OTHER PERSON TO ASSUME FOR IT ANY OTHER LIABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO ITS EQUIPMENT. AWI SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR, NOR FOR ANY
INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE DUE TO INOPERAB ILITY OF ITS EQUIPMENT FOR ANY
REASON NOR ON ANY CLAIM THAT ITS EQUIPMENT WAS NEGLIGENTLY DESIGNED OR MANUFACTURED.
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. Quote (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: June 4, 2024 FROM: Michael Webb, Public Works ITEIVI NO. 4. 11( c) Director
APPROVED BY***
c a bEi ' c r Cs t7 reetcsr 5f2? t2t}`? te r , ; r 81?C}? mwebb@cityofredding. org btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4. 11( c)-- Make a Finding to Sole Source Water Treatment Plant Filter Underdrains to AWI
Recommendation
Approve the sole source designation of water treatment plant filter underdrain and air- scour system; and find that the name of AWI in the specifications for City of Redding Public Works Department projects is authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2) in order to match other products in use by the City of Redding Public Works Department— Water Utility.
Fiscal Impact
The repair/ replacement of filter underdrains is done on an as needed basis and are contracted through the Public Works Department's bidding process. Funds are budgeted in Public Works - Water Utility' s capital and operation and maintenance ( O& M) budgets for treatment plant projects. A maintenance project to replace existing filter underdrain and air- scour systems is under design and will be put out to bid this summer.
Alte native Action
The City Council ( Council) may choose not to make a finding to sole source a11 lter underdrains to AWI and provide alternate direction to staff.
Backg ound/ Analysis
The Public Works Department - Water Utility treats raw drinking water through a filtration and disinfection process at our two water treatment plants ( WTP) — Foothill and Buckeye. In Fiscal Year 2018- 19, at the Buckeye WTP, four filter nnderdrains constructed in 2005 had failed and were replaced. The original underdrains that failed were Roberts brand plastic underdrains and were replaced with a stainless- steel underdrain and air- scour system manufactured by AWL AWI has been in business since 19 8 and their underdrains are manufactured in the United States.
Staff is pleased with the durability and operation of the stainless-steel underdrain and air-scour system compared to the plastic underdrains.
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: June 4, 2024 Staff Report (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant) Report to Redding City Council May 29, Z024
Re: 4. 12( c)-- Authorize the Sole Source of Filter Underdrains to AWI Page 2 The remaining four plastic underdrains at the Buckeye WTP were constructed in 2008 and staff is concerned about their longevity. Of those, filter # 5 recently failed and the Public Works Department - Engineering Division is preparing to release a capital construction project to replace those four- filter underdrain and air- scour systems.
Staff is requesting Council to make a sole source finding that would allow the AWI underdrains to be specified in the plans and specifications. By matching existing equipment, it minimizes training and maximizes maintenance efficiencies including stocking of spare parts. In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 3400( c)( 2)., the Council may make a finding for a material, product, or service by specific brand or trade name in order to match other products in use within the City of Redding' s water system. Such a finding would allow the benefits described above to be realized.
Envi^ onmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The capital project will be subject to review under CEQA prior to award of a construction contract.
Council Prior ity/ City ManageN Goals
Government of the
21St
Century — ` Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today' s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today."
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: June 4, 2024 Staff Report (4.11(b)--Authorize Purchase of Spare Filter Underdrain for Foothill Water Treatment Plant)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the project plans, specifications , and construction, of the sewer line associated with the Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement (C-9727) as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $3,053,466.78.
Fiscal Impact
The Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) is fully funded by the City of Redding (City) Wastewater Utility which has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget for this project. The total agreement’s final cost is $3,053,466.78.
Cost
Summary(1)
Item Initial Authorized Increase Amount Final Authorized Actual Amount Agreement(2) $ 1,940 $ 1,260 $ 3,200 $ 2,988
City Con.
Management
$
0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 65 City
Manager
Auth. Funds
$
0 $ 100 $ 100 $ 0 TOTAL
PROJECT
COSTS $ 1,940 $ 1,460 $ 3,400 $ 3,053 TOTAL
PROJECT
BUDGET $ 1,940 $ 1,460 $ 3,400 $ 3,400 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Project and Agreement Acceptance for the Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 187
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 2
Notes:
(1)Figures shown in thousands.
(2)Agreement includes all project development costs, construction contract, consultant construction management services and project contingency
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the agreement as satisfactorily complete, and provide alternate direction to staff.
Background
Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has completed all items of work on Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement as of September 13, 2024, which was within the contract time frame. The project warranty period expire d one year from the completion date of September 13, 2024.
On February 7, 2023, Council authorized a reimbursement agreement to Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, for a total authorized amount of $1,940,000 . In March 2023, the project was subsequently advertised for construction and the City received two bids from local contractors .
The low bid was approximately $1,200,000 higher than the engineers estimate that was provided by the developer’s consultant engineer, Sha rrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. On May 16, 2023, Council authorized an amendment to the agreement in the amount of $1,2 60,000 to account for actual bids received and additionally authorized $100,000 for City construction management and inspection staff. The City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases to the agreement up to $100,000 for a total authorized amount of $3,400,000 . Construction of the improvements was ultimately awarded to the low bidder, Stimpel -Wiebelhaus Associates, of Redding, CA. The final agreements cost was $2,988,401.72.
As part of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Project Phase 2, the developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, was conditioned (AMND -2017-00160, Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-15-07, and Planned Development Plan Application PD-11-07) to upsize the Trinity Street sewer main downstream of Manholes J6 -41, J6-28, and J6-32 (Condition 64). By upsizing the sewer main, effectively increasing the capacity, the development can build an additional 42 units beyond the first phase as entitled. The replacement of the subject sewer main is a project identified in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan and therefore eligible for reimbursement in accordance with the conditions of development and Redding Municipal Code . These improvements will better serve the surrounding City residents and provide necessary sewer capacity for future planned growth.
The agreement included design, construction and construction management of approximately 925 lineal feet of 14 -inch sewer f orce main, 600 lineal feet of 27 -inch sewer main along Court Street, Trinity Street, within the YMCA parking lot and under the railroad to Continental Street, 450 linear feet of CIPP lining the existing 24” gravity sewer line, manhole replacement and rehabilitation.
Packet Pg. 188
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 3
Environmental Review
The proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On February 7 , 20 23, Council determined that the Trinity Street Sewer Project was categorically exempt from review und er CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures). No further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Previous Staff Report 020723
Previous Staff Report 051623
Agreement (C-9727)
Packet Pg. 189
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the fol lowing actions relative to the Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company for the design and construction of the replacement and upsizing of the sewer line along Trinity Street from Court Street to Continental Street for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision project:
(1) Approve the Agreement in the amount of $1,940,000;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases based on the construction bid amounts or change orders required during the course of construction up to a total of $300,000; and
(3) Find the action categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Construction or Conver sion of Existing Structures).
Fiscal Impact
The design and construction of the sewer main is estimated to total $ 1,940,000. The Wastewater Utility has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022 -23 b udget for this project including any City Manager amounts specified in the recommendation.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve the reimbursement agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, for design and construction of the sewer line. The Salt Creek Heights Subdivision development project would be limited as to the number of lots it could develop. The City of Redding (City) would design, bid, and construct the sewer line at a later date as scheduled in the Wastewater Master Plan and the additional lots may be developed at that time.
MEETING DATE: February 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Report to Redding City Council February 1, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 2
Background/Analysis
As part of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Project Phase 2, the developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, was conditioned (AMND -2017-00160, Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-15-07, and Planned Development Plan Application PD -11-07) to upsize the Trinity Street sewer main downstream of Manholes J6 -41, J6-28, and J6 -32 (Condition 64). By upsizing the sewer main, effectively increasing the capacity , the development can build a n additional 42 units beyond the first phase as entitled. The replacement of the subject sewer main is a project identified in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan and therefore eligible for reimbursement in accordance with the conditions of development.
The proposed agreement was developed in accordance with Council Policy 1502, Developer Participation Agreements. The policy calls for the developer to design and construct the facility in accordance with Public Contract Code with the City approving/inspectin g the design and construction of the sewer line to ensure conformance to City of Redding Construction Standards with reimbursement to the developer.
The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
Staff has determ ined that the project qualifies as categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Constructio n or Conversion of Existing Structures). Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing wastewater system will be renovated to meet customer needs and current public safety standards. The project will be located on the same site, will have substantially the same purpose and capacity, and will result in a negligible expansion of use. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Report to Redding City Council February 1, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 3
Attachments
^NOE Trinity Street Sewer
^Trinity Street Offsite Sewer - Exhibit A
Payment Performance Maintenance Bonds_Exhibit B
Trinity Street Reimbursement_signed
Council Policy No. 1502
Redding Municipal Code Chapter 16.20.090
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Civil Engineering • Land Planning • Surveying & Mapping Landscape Architecture • Presentation Graphics
320 Hartnell Avenue, Redding, CA 96002
530.221.1792 voice • 530.221.8369 fax • [email protected] SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Exhibit B1
1 PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO.:
PAYMENT (LABOR AND MATERIALS) BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, a Municipal Corporation, in the State of California, as Owner, has on __________, conditionally awarded to ____________________________ as Principal, a Contract to do and perform the following work to-wit:
as will more fully appear in said Contract, the terms and conditions of said Contract being fully incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract and pursuant to Chapter 5 of Title 3 of Part 6 of Division 4 of the California Civil Code (commencing with Civil Code Section 9550), Principal is required to furnish a good and sufficient payment bond to secure payment of the claims to which reference is made in Civil Code Section 9554; NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and ______ _____________________, a corporation duly authorized and admitted to transact business and issue surety bonds in the State of California, hereinafter called Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Owner, and unto all persons or entities entitled to assert a claim against a payment bond under any of the aforesaid Civil Code pr ovisions in the penal sum of __ __________ Dollars ($____________) lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Princ ipal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials or equipment furnished or used in performance of the Contract, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Franchise Tax Board or the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the Contractor and all subcontractors with respect to such work or labor, then the Surety shall pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified above. If suit is brought upon this bond, Surety shall pay, in addition to the above sum, all costs, expenses and fee s, including attorney's fees, reasonably incurred by any party in successfully enforcing the obligation secured hereby, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligati on shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, and shall bind Contractor, Surety, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally.
It is hereby stipulated and agreed that t his bond shall inure to the benefit of all persons, companies, corporations, political subdivisions, State agencies and other entities entitled to assert a claim against a payment bond under any of the aforesaid Civil Code provisions, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed there under or to the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. Furthermore, and for valuable consideration, Surety hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2819, 2845, and 2849.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereto set our hands and seals on this day of , .
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Principal
City Attorney By:
ATTEST: (Seal)
Pamela Mize, City Clerk Name of Surety
By: (Seal)
Attorney-In-Fact
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Exhibit B2
2 Bond No.:
PUBLIC WORKS
PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redding, a Municipal Corporation , as Owner, at its regular meeting held on ____________, has awarded to
as Principal, a contract to do and perform the following work to-wit:
as will more fully appear in said contract, the terms and conditions of said contract being fully incorporated herein by this reference.
WHEREAS, said Principal is required under terms of said contract to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said contract;
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and
as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Owner in the sum of
Dollars $
lawful money of the United States of Ameri ca, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements in the said contract an d any alteration thereof as there provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified and in all respects according to their true intent and mea ning and shall indemnify and save harmless the Owner, its o fficers, and agents as therein stipulated then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and virtue.
As the Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alt eration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accom panying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of ti me, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications.
If said Owner shall require any further or other bond for its protection in the premises, such further or other bond shall be furnished by the Principal with Surety or Sureties satisfactory to the Owner within ten days after notice of such requirement is given to the Principal, and in case of failure on the part of the Principal to comply with said requirement, the Owner shall have t he right, at its option, to terminate said contract with said Principal.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereto set our hands and seals on this day of , .
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Principal
City Attorney By:
ATTEST: (Seal)
Pamela Mize, City Clerk Name of Surety
By: (Seal)
Attorney-In-Fact
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Exhibit B3
3 BOND NO.:
PUBLIC WORKS
MAINTENANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WE, the undersigned,
as Principal, and
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and authorized to do business in the State if California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF REDDING, hereinafter called Obligee, in the sum
( ) Dollars,
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which well and truly to be made, we do hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, said Principal has heretofore entered into a contract with the Obligee above named for
, and,
WHEREAS, the work called for under said contract has been completed and accepted by said Obligee:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH , that if said Principal shall, for a period of one year(s) from and after the ___ day of , , \indemnify the Obligee against any loss or damage directly arising by reason of any defect in the material or workmanship which may be discovered within the period aforesaid, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise the same shall remain in full force and effect.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that in the event of any default on the part of said Principal, written statement of the particular facts showing such default and the date thereof shall be delivered to the Surety by registered mail promptly and in any event within ten (10) days after the Obligee or his representative shall learn of such default; and that no claim, suit, or action by reason of any default of the Principal shall be brough t hereunder after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the end of the maintenance period as herein set forth.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereto set our hands and seals on this day of , .
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Principal
City Attorney City Attorney By:
ATTEST: (Seal)
Pamela Mize, City Clerk Name of Surety
By: (Seal)
Attorney-In-Fact
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS
RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER
EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-21
1502 02-06-01
1 of 2
BACKGROUND
From time to time, it is advantageous for the City to enter into Developer Participation Agreements with private developers for the design and construction of various types of public infrastructure when the work is an integral part of a developer’s project. This is normally done when a developer and City contemplate the developer constructing project related infrastructure with City funding including (but not limited to) impact fees and/or in- lieu park funds.
These agreements are designed to outsource t he design, construction and project administration. The Director in charge of the funding source is responsible for developing the scope of work and related agreement describing the infrastructure project (Project) with support from the City Attorney and P ublic Works Director. The City Engineer and his designees are responsible for administering the agreement and related project development and construction of the Project, unless otherwise directed by the City Manager.
POLICY
The development and administration of a Developer Participation Agreement shall be based on the following guidelines:
Project Scope, Cost and Schedule
All of the elements of the project will be identified and agreed upon by developer and City including relative responsibility, proje ct scope, cost and time frame for completion. These elements will be documented in the agreement.
Developer Participation Agreement
The agreement will be prepared jointly by the Developer and the Director in charge of the funding source and will include review/concurrence by the City Attorney and City Engineer. The Agreement must be approved by City Council prior to any work on the Project. Following are key elements of the agreement:
Funding
The agreement shall stipulate a maximum dollar contributi on by the City which shall not be exceeded without City Council approval. The agreement will include estimates of project costs including Project Development and Construction costs.
Project Development
The agreement will include provisions requiring that the Project be designed in accordance with City Construction Standards and include a City quality assurance oversight process.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS
RESOLUTION
NUMBER
POLICY
NUMBER
EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
01-21
1502 02-06-01
2 of 2
Construction
The agreement will require the construction contract (plan s, specifications and bid quantities) be developed by the developer and reviewed/approved by the City Engineer before putting the Project out to bid. The construction contract will include, but not limited to, the following key elements:
• Prevailing Wage Requirements
• Non Discrimination Provisions
• Title VI Requirements
• Insurance Requirements
• Contractor licensing requirements
• Department of Industrial Relations registration requirements • Bonding – industry standard payment, performance and maintenance bonds • Subcontracting requirements
• Contract Change Order Provisions
• Other items as required by the City Engineer
Bid and Contract Approval Process
The agreement will include a Public Works -like bidding process with defined City oversight including the following key items:
• Advertisement – advertisement and bid opening dates, publications, etc. • Addendum Procedures
• Bid Opening Procedures
• Bid Protest Process
• City Council Contract Award and Approval Process
Construction Management and City Oversight
The agreement will include the requirement for inspection and City Engineer -approved construction administration oversight. In addition, the agreement will outline the following key elements:
• Developer Quality Control and City Quality Assurance Requirements • Construction Contract Change Orders approval and City concurrence process • Progress Payment Process – City concurrence role
• Labor Compliance process and related City quality assurance
Contract Acceptance – agreement to include City Engineer approved notice of completion and City Council acceptance of the project as complete. This will include developer submitting full accounting of project costs before project being presented to City Council.
Amended 05/15/18 by Resolution No. 2018-045
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) A.
1. a.
i.
ii.
2. 3.
4. 16.20.090 - Reimbursement (cash or credit) for construction of facilities.
Reimbursement—A condition of approval and/or a development agreement for a land use entitlement may require an owner or developer of a property to construct certain facility improvements or portions thereof specified in the capital improvement program as updated from time to time. Such direction allows the owner to petition the city council for reimbursement for the cost of specified improvements related to any and all impact fees applied to the project. The petition is allowed if the owner (a) constructs the facility, (b) finances an improvement, (c) makes dedication of land in support of the facility, or (d) utilizes a combination of the above. Reimbursement is subject to an approved agreement.
Reimbursed Improvements—The owner or developer shall only be eligible for improvements included in the capital improvement program project. Frontage improvements as defined below are not considered part of capital improvement program project and are not eligible for reimbursement.
Frontage Improvements.
Roadway—Roadway frontage improvements typically consisting of a one-half section, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscape, bike lane, parking lane, acceleration and deceleration lanes and right- and left-turn lanes leading to those roads and driveways, traffic-control measures for those roads and driveways, and related storm-drain facilities along the entire frontage of the entitled project.
Utilities—Utility frontage improvements include logical and orderly extensions of water, wastewater, storm-drain utilities, streetlights, and communication facilities along the entire frontage of the entitled project.
Reimbursed Value—The reimbursement amount shall be based on the actual value of land dedicated for the facility, actual cost of improvements, and actual costs for engineering and city administration.
Reimbursement Schedule—Upon completion of construction and acceptance of the improvements by the city or financing the improvements in a manner satisfactory to the city council, the owner or developer will be eligible for reimbursement in the year the improvement is programmed in the city's capital improvement program. Reimbursement is available only to the degree funds are available in any given year. If reimbursement cannot be made during one year, the unreimbursed portion will continue in following years until repaid.
Credit and Cash Reimbursement—The owner or developer will be provided reimbursement in the form of development fee credits consistent with fee program and type of improvement. If the amount of the fee credit is less than the amount of the otherwise applicable fee, the property owner shall thereafter pay an amount which, added
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
5. to the credit received for the construction of facilities, equals the fee obligation. If the fee credit is greater than the amount of the otherwise applicable fee, the property owner may be paid the difference from the appropriate impact fee fund, providing funds are available.
Reimbursement Agreement—To implement this section, the city and owner or developer shall enter into a reimbursement agreement prior to incurring any eligible project development and/or construction costs. Reimbursement agreements will be considered for approval by the city council.
(Ord. No. 2500, § 3, 9-3-2013)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 020723 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Reimbursement Agreement (C -9727) (Agreement) with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company for the design and construction of the replacement and upsizing of the sewer line along Trinity Street from Court Street to Contine ntal Street for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision project:
(1) Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for an increase of $1,260,000 for a new total of $3,200,000;
(2) Authorize $100,000 for City Construction Management staff time for the project; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases to the agreement for construction change orders or construction management and inspection up to a total of $100,000.
Fiscal Impact
The new estimated project budget is $3, 400,000. The W astewater Utility has sufficient funds appropriated in the approved Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget for this project.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve the amendment to the reimbursement agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, for design and construction of the sewer line. The Salt Creek Heights Subdivision development project would be limited as to the number of lots it could develop. The City of Redding (City) would design, bid, and construct the sewer line at a later date as scheduled in the Wastewater Master Plan and the additional lots may be developed at that time.
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 139Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 051623 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Report to Redding City Council May 9, 2023
Re: 4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement Page 2
Background/Analysis
As part of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Project Phase 2, the developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Compan y, was conditioned (AMND -2017-00160, Tentative Subdivision Map Application S -15-07, and Planned Development Plan Application PD -11-07) to upsize the Trinity Street sewer main downstream of Manholes J6 -41, J6-28, and J6 -32 (Condition 64). By upsizing the se wer main, effectively increasing the capacity, the development can build an additional 42 units beyond the first phase as entitled. The replacement of the subject sewer main is a project identified in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan and , therefore, eligible for reimbursement in accordance with the conditions of development.
On February 7, 2023, Council approved the original agreement. The project was subsequently advertised for construction bids. Two contractors submitted qualified bids . The low bid is approximately $1,200,000 higher than the engineers estimate that was provided by the developer’s consultant engineer, Sharrah, Dunlap, Sawyer. Consequently, the agreement requires an amendment to reflect the total overall project budget subject to reimburs ement. It is anticipated that the developer will award the construction contract to the low bidder, Stimpel- Wiebelhaus Associates, of Redding, CA.
The amendment has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
On February 7, 2023, the Council determined the activity was categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction), and 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures). No further action is needed.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.
Attachments
First Amendment (C-9727)
020723-Staff Report Approved-TrinitySewer Reimb
C-9727 - Agreement to Provide Reimbursement
Packet Pg. 140Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 051623 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: First Amendment (C-9727) (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 051623 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: First Amendment (C-9727) (4.11(e)--Amendment to Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 051623 (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
TRANSMITTAL FORM
HARD COPIES REQUIRED * DQ NOT E-MAIL FQR REVIEW
TO CIIYATTORNEY (225-4050) & CITY CLERK (225-4439)
Agreements ❖ Bonds ❖ Contracts ❖ Leases ❖ Escrow Instructions ❖ Deeds ❖ Securities ❖ Resolutions ❖ Ordinances ❖ Opinions Date: 02/08/23 From: Stephanie McCollum
Dept. Name: _U_ti_lit_ie_s __________ Dept.# ___ _ -u Phone: ________ _ Person most knowledgeable: _R_y_a_n _B_ai_le_y _______ _ INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS MET? Prior to signatures, must submit Insurance Transmittal Form to Risk, have certificate uploaded by vendor and approved by Risk. If not, your contracts will be held in the Clerk's Office. For help contact Risk Liability- [email protected](530) 225-4385.
DESCRIBE ATTACHED DOCUMENT(S)
Document Title: Agreement to Provide Reimbursement for the Construction of Sewer Line Outside Party(ies): Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company Project (What/Where/Why?): _SaJt __ C_re_e_k_H_e_ig=-h_ts_S_ub_d_iv_is_i_on _________________ _ COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED? No0Yes(7) IF YES, DATE OF MEETING: 217/23 Agenda Item#: 4.11(d) Was contract/agreement the result of an RFP or Bid? No[ZJOsD Bid Schedule# or RFP #:
IS CONTRACT RELATED TO THE CARR FIRE? No({!Yes
REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY SERVICES
D Ntorncy !mews Draft -AU documents must be reviewed & approved~ obtaining any signatures. □
[l]
□
B
□
When amending contracts, attach a copy of original contract and all prior amendments. Do not e-mail documents without prior approval.
Return drafts to: _____________________ (to finalize & obtain outside signatures) Attorney Sips Orj,:inals, Approving As To Form After: (1) draft has been previously reviewed & approved by Attorney; (2) Dept. has obtained outside signatures. Please submit two (2) originals. Useq ,., 7 paperclips - no staples -- and affix "Sign Here" tabs on all signature pages. 7 '- (Attorney approval now mandatory-RMC §4.20.120.A)
*Note: Signed originals will be forwarded to City Clerk for necessary City signatures, insurance & other requirement verification, and processing. ~ ~ "b
Mailing/distribution Instructions: ___________________ 4_/,u_J_1,_!> __ ......,. __ ,-, :r,
Prepare Certificate of Acceptance (easement & grant deeds) Memo or additional info is attached.
Other:-------------------------------------
Save for Attorney's Notes
City Attorney Log# dO:)...J, ... { 7 #
Logged Out By: --~v..,,...A-~'--"-:::-----
Rev. 8/18
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) CITY 0 F
I
CALI FOR
PAMELA MIZE, CITY CLERK
SHARLENE TIPTON, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
530.225.4447
530.225.4463 FAX
CITY OF REDDING
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
PO BOX 496071, Redding, CA 96049-6071
cityofredding.org
April 26, 2023
Sierra Pacific Land & Timber Company
ATTN: M.D. Emmerson
19794 Riverside Ave.
Anderson, CA 96007
RE: Agreement to Provide Reimbursement - C-9727
Dear M.D. Emmerson:
Enclosed please find the above referenced fully executed Agreement to Provide Reimbursement for the Construction of Sewer Line by and between the City of Redding and Sierra Pacific Land & Timber Company relative to the Trinity Street sewer line in the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision.
If you have any questions regarding this agreement, or if we can be of assistance, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (530) 225-4439.
Enclosure
cc: Stephanie McCollum
Ryan Bailey
Ellen Grannis
Sincerely,
Kristen
Management Analyst
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE
REIMBURSEMENT FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER LINE
THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between SIERRA PACIFIC LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY; hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the CITY OF REDDING, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City'':
WHEREAS, the City installs and maintains sewer lines within the incorporated areas of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is constructing a development project known as Salt Creek Heights Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Developer was conditioned (AMND-2017-00160) to upsize the Trinity Street sewer line downstream of Manholes J6-4 l, J6-28, and J6-32 (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the conditions state the Developer may request reimbursement or credit from the City Wastewater Utility for these improvements; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy 1502 authorizes developer participation agreements adhering to the guidance of the policy; and
WHEREAS, Per the Conditions of Approval, the Developer has requested that the City reimburse costs for the design and construction of upsizing the sewer collection line inside the incorporated area of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer's design engineer has estimated that the cost to design and construct the sewer line for the proposed project is $1,940,000 (the "Estimated Project Cost").
2 {
I
I
N
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows:
SECTION 1. DEVELOPER
The names, addresses, and descriptions of the person or persons herein collectively referred to as "Developer" are as follows:
Name Address
M.D. Emmerson 19794 Riverside Ave.
Sierra Pacific Land & Timber Company Anderson, CA 96007 SECTION 2. SCOPE OF WORK
A. Developer agrees to cause to construct sewer lines along the location and route of the sewer line shown on Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. In general, the sewer line shall extend from Court Street through APN: I 03-010-002, under Union Pacific Rai !road (UPRR), along Trinity Street to Continental Street and all other associated work (collectively, the "Work").
B. The Work shall be performed strictly in accordance with development plans that have been prepared by Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., civil engineers ("Designer") at the direction of the Developer based on the City of Redding Construction Standards and reviewed and approved by UPRR and the City's Public Works Engineering Division (the "Final Plans''), incorporated herein by reference. Development Plans shall include drawings, specifications, bid item breakdown list with unit prices and all other pe11inent information and exhibits regarding the project. The Work shall be subject to inspection by and approval of the City's Public Works Engineering Division for conformance with the Final Plans and sound construction practices. If the Construction/Inspection Management Division of the City's Public Works Engineering Division, in its judgment, determines that any Work is not in substantial conformity with the Final Plans and City of Redding Construction Standards (CORCS) or are not otherwise in substantial conformity with sound building practices, the City shall have the right to order a correction to the Work by written notice to the Developer. All conection costs due to non-conformity will not be reimbursed by the City and shall be borne by the Developer. No material changes shall be made to the Final Plans or specifications without the City's prior written consent.
SECTION 3. PROJECT COSTS
A. Estimated Project Cost: The estimated project cost is approximately one million nine hundred forty thousand dollars ($1,940,000). Costs include design, construction, and construction management. It is acknowledged that the estimated cost is based upon preliminary cost estimates, and is not the result of competitive bids, and, therefore, is subject to change. Costs shall be reimbursed to Developer per Section 6 below.
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) B. Total Project Cost: Developer agrees to deliver the Project to the City for a Total Project Cost which shall include the Actual Construction Cost, as defined in Section
3.C herein. The Total Project Cost shall be set by the City, known as the Approved Budget per Section 6, following the bid opening.
C. Actual Construction Cost: The actual construction cost shall include, as hereinafter provided, Improvement Costs, costs of Change Orders, and Other Cost Increases defined below ("Actual Construction Costs").
1. Improvement Costs: The improvement costs include, but shall not be limited to, costs of preparing the Project budget, construction, bonds, all other fees and charges (e.g., permit fees, inspection fees, etc.) associated with actual construction of the Project, engineering, surveying, staking, permitting costs, and construction management costs.
2. Change Orders: A "Change Order" is a written order, approved by the City, from any of Developer's authorized representative (Developer's Agent) to the contractor performing the work authorizing a change in the work to be performed. Change Orders may be needed where changes in the Project are made necessary if (1) unforeseen conditions arise during construction (2) such change would result in materials of lesser quality being used in the Work, or (3) such change represents a deviation, whether or not lesser quality, in the Final Plans and specifications after construction begins. City has right to authorize or reject change order requests. All Change Orders must be approved in writing and deliver such Change Order to Developer's Agent as identified below.
a. Approval of Change Orders: A "Change Order" is a written order from Developer and City to the contractor performing the work authorizing a change in the work to be performed. Developer's Agent shall notify City's representative, of the need for a Change Order and City's representative shall either approve or reject said Change Order within ten (10) working days of receiving Developer's Agent's written notice.
City staff may approve Change Orders. For purposes of notification with regard to Change Orders, the City's representative shall mean the person responsible for overseeing design and construction, and will be established at the pre-construction meeting.
b. Markup of Change Orders: Work by Contractor. The following percentages shall be added to the Contractor's costs and shall constitute full payment for all overhead and profit.
Overhead costs shall include, but not be limited to such items as project superintendent, project managers, field and home office expenses.
I) Labor 35%
2) Material 15%
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) 3) Equipment Rental & Other Items 15%
4) Subcontractor Work 10% (this markup may be applied a maximum of one time to the extra work bill)
Work by Subcontractor. When extra work is performed by a subcontractor, the following percentages shall be added to the subcontractor's costs and shall constitute full payment for all overhead and profit.
Overhead costs shall include, but not be limited to such items as project superintendence, project managers, field and home office expenses.
1) Labor 35%
2) Material 15%
3) Equipment Rental & Other Items 15%
4) Second-Tier Subcontractor 10% (this markup may be applied a maximum of one time to the extra work bill)
D. Solicitation of Bids: Developer shall solicit sealed bids for the construction of the Work in accordance with Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 22037 as follows:
I. The notice inviting formal bids shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids and distinctly describe the project. The notice shall be published at least fourteen ( 14) calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the jurisdiction of the public agency; or, if there is no newspaper printed and published within the jurisdiction of the public agency, publication shall be by posting the notice in at least three places within the jurisdiction of the public agency as have been designated by ordinance or regulation of the public agency as places for posting of its notices. The notice inviting formal bids shall also be mailed to all construction trade journals specified in PCC Section 2203, Construction Bid board ( ebidboard), Dodge Data & Analytics, Humboldt Builders Exchange, Shasta Builders Exchange, and Placer Builders Exchange. The notice shall be mailed at least 30 calendar days before the date of opening the bid.
2. Bid Opening and Award of Contract: Developer shall open sealed bids in presence of City's authorized representative(s). Developer shall provide City's representative(s) with a copy of the tabulation of bid results. Developer shall award contract(s) for the construction of the Project to the qualified and responsible contractor(s) submitting the lowest responsible and responsive bid(s), as mutually agreed by Developer and City's authorized representative(s). Developer shall be the awarding body of the contract for the construction of the Work, and City shall not be a party to said contract. In the event the lowest responsible and responsive bid, combined with a reasonable amount for contingencies, exceeds the Estimated Construction Cost set forth in Section 3 above, the increase in the Estimated Construction Cost must be Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) approved by City prior to awarding the contract.
SECTION 4. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Developer shall cause the Contractor (as defined below) to commence the Work by the issuance of a Notice to Proceed delivered after execution of the Construction Contract and the Developer estimates that the Work shall be completed no later than September I, 2023.
B. If Developer fails to perform or comply with any of its obligations under this Agreement, as and when required, which continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of such failure by the City to Developer (provided, however, if such failure is susceptible of cure but cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, and Developer shall have commenced to cure such failure within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently and expeditiously proceeds to cure the same, such thirty (30) day period shall be extended for an additional period of time as is reasonably necessary for the Developer in the exercise of due diligence to cure such failure), then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately after the passage of applicable notice and cure periods. Upon such termination, the Developer shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for Work completed in conformance with the Final Plans and City of Redding Construction Standards, but not with respect to any Work not executed by the Contractor.
C. City may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days' written notice. In the event of termination by the City without cause prior to commencement of construction, the Developer shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for costs incurred by the Developer as a direct result of such termination. In case of termination for the City's convenience after commencement of construction, the Developer shall be entitled to receive payment for Work completed, and costs reasonably incurred by Developer as a direct result of such termination (including, without limitation, any termination fee or cost due Contractor and/or any subcontractor or materialman), but not with respect to any Work not completed by Contractor.
D. Developer hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City's funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the Work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days' written notice of its intention to terminate.
In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Developer shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement but shall be entitled to reimbursement as set forth in Section 4.C above. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Developer shall promptly assign and Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) deliver to City any and all finished and unfinished rep01is, data, studies, photographs, charts or other non-legally privileged work product prepared by or at the direction of Developer pursuant to this Contract to the extent assignable by the Developer. To the extent permitted by law, City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product. City agrees and acknowledges that any work product transferred pursuant to this Section 4.E are transferred "AS-IS" without any representation or warranty by Developer and Developer shall have no liability to City or any other party with respect to the use of any such work product after the termination of this Contract, and City shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless, Developer, its members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigative costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected, which in any way arise out of or relate to the use of the work product.
F. Subject to Section 4. E, in no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party's failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.
SECTION 5. CONSTRUCTION
A. The Developer shall cause the Work to be performed by a contractor ("Contractor'') licensed in the State of California for the Work performed and shall require a construction contract ("Construction Contract") the form and content of which must be reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works Engineering Division prior to execution by the Developer. The Construction Contract and construction management will include, but not be limited to, the following key elements:
• California Prevailing Wage Requirements per Section l O of this Agreement • Contractor registration with the California Department of Industrial Relations per Section 10 of this Agreement
• Industry standard performance bond and payment bond with each not less than I 00 percent of the contract work and a maintenance bond in an amount not less than 50 percent of the contract work. The maintenance bond shall extend 12 consecutive months beyond the Notice of Completion date indicating City acceptance of the Work. The form of the required bonds shall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B 1, 82, and B3". • The Developer shall contract with a qualified entity ("Construction Manager") to provide all construction management services to include quality control, material testing, labor compliance and all necessary field inspection to ensure the project is built to the bid specifications, Final Plans, and CORCS.
Inspection should be considered intermittent dependent on the work being performed. The Construction Manager shall be entitled to a fee, which fee shall be paid by Developer as part of the Approved Budget, of the Construction Manager's general conditions. Construction Manager qualifications shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to Developer entering into an agreement. The qualifications of the Construction Manager shall include all -6~
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) projects in progress or completed over the last five (5) years that are comparable to the project, designated personnel and their roles on submitted projects and include agency references with names, addresses, and current phone numbers.
The responsible personnel of the Construction Manager shall also be identified and at minimum shall include the Project manager, Resident Engineer, Inspector and other key project staff who will be directly involved in the project.
B. The Developer shall keep an accurate record of the actual cost of the Project in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures. Developer shall allow the City's authorized representatives to examine and provide copies of any records relevant to the verification of the actual cost of constructing the Project, including, without limitation, all contract bids, invoices, and change orders. Any changes that occur during the course of construction shall be properly documented.
C. The Construction Contract shall be a guaranteed maximum price or stipulated sum contract and shall contain industry standard warranties and indemnities in favor of the City as set forth in Section 8 hereof. The Contractor shall have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Contractor to carry out the Work.
D. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections I 0262 and l 0262.5 of the Public Contract Code and Section 7108.5 of the Business and Professions Code concerning prompt payment to subcontractors.
E. Upon satisfactory completion, the Developer shall prepare and deliver to the City as built construction drawings in a format acceptable to the City.
F. The Developer shall have the sole responsibility for obtaining and maintammg records of any and all necessary access agreements and easements onto private property for construction of any portion the work required by the project including staging areas and temporary construction easements. The Developer shall be responsible for any costs associated with obtaining access, agreements and easements and verifying the validity of existing easements
SECTION 6. DEVELOPERS REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT
A. City shall reimburse Developer for the actual costs of the Work, in accordance with Section 3.B, and in an amount not to exceed the Approved Budget described in Section 6.B below.
B. The Developer shall submit to the City a proposed budget for completion of the Work (which shall include the Designer's fee, the Construction Manager's fee, the Construction Manager's general conditions, and the proposed Construction Contract amount) for review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonable withheld, conditioned, or delayed. The City shall, within five (5) business days, approve the proposed budget, or provide to the Developer a statement of changes required to be Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) made in order for the proposed budget to be approved. If the proposed budget exceeds the Estimated Project Cost, Council approval shall be required. The Developer shall not cause construction to commence unless the proposed budget has been approved by the City. Once approved by the City, the proposed budget as modified by change orders is referred to herein as the "Approved Budget."
C. Developer shall submit funding requests as frequently as monthly to the City for Work completed to the date of the funding request. All funding requests shall include a certification from the Construction Manager that specified Work has been completed (including percentage of completion) in a good and workmanlike manner and that, except for Work covered by the current funding request, all due and payable payments have been made for all other labor and materials excluding a 5 percent retention payable at time of final payment. The funding request shall also include certified payroll records in accordance with Section 1 0.A and conditional or unconditional releases of liens (through the date covered by the immediately preceding funding request) from (a) the Contractor and (b) all other potential lien claimants ( e.g., subcontractors, laborers, materialmen) performing labor or services or supplying materials in connection with the Work.
Within ten (10) business days after receipt of a funding request from Developer, the City Public Works Engineering Division shall approve the complete funding request or only a portion of the funding request in its reasonable discretion and notify Developer.
The City shall not disapprove a funding request that conforms with the Approved Budget and is accompanied by the backup documentation required above. If the City Public Works Engineering Division disapproves any amount requested by Developer in a disbursement request, the City shall promptly notify Developer of the disapproved amount and the reason for disapproval. If any item in a disbursement request is disapproved, the representatives of Developer and the City shall meet promptly and in good faith to attempt to resolve the matter to their mutual satisfaction.
D. All correct, complete and undisputed funding requests sent by Developer to City shall be paid within thi1iy (30) calendar days of receipt.
SECTION 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties to this Agreement; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Agreement; and that the execution, performance • and delivery of this Agreement by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Agreement.
B. This Agreement has the same force and effect as any deed covenant running with the land and shall benefit and bind all owners of the property present and future, and their heirs, successors and assigns.
C. Developer shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture -8-
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Developer performs under this Agreement.
Any and all taxes imposed on Developer's income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Agreement or its performance, including but not limited to use taxes, shall be paid by Developer. Developer shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Developer is an employee of City.
Developer shall not be eligible for coverage under City's workers' compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.
D. No provision of this Agreement is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.
E. Developer shall cause the Contractor to maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to the Work. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to any authorized representative of City. Developer shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Agreement, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.
F. To the greatest extent permitted by applicable law, each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.
SECTION 8. INSURANCE
The obligations to the City required of Developer in Section 8 relating to insurance may be satisfied by Developer's authorized subcontractor if the obligations set forth in Section 8 are met by the Developer's subcontractor. Only in such event shall Developer be relieved of the obligations set forth in Section 1.
A. Contractor and Designer shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:
Coverage Reguired Not Reguired
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an "x" in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. l/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;
3. Statutory Workers' Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Developer's profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.
5. Course of Construction Insurance providing coverage for all "risks" ofloss in the amount of the completed project value.
6. Contractor Pollution Liability, in the amount of $1,000,000, to include but not limited to coverage for bodily injury, property damage and cleanup arising from pollution conditions created by the contractor or encountered during work at job site. Coverage must apply to cleanup, damage or injury that occurs on, or that originates from, the site.
7. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording "but only in the event of a named insured's sole negligence" or any other verbiage limiting the insured's insurance responsibility.
C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. .
D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Developer; premises owned, leased or used by Developer; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Developer.
The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
2. The insurance coverage of Developer shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Developer's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Developer shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Developer agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to the insureds.
E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A-VII.
F. Developer shall cause the Contractor to designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the insurance. Developer shall cause the Contractor to furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City's Risk Manager prior to the commencement of the Work. City may withhold payments to Developer if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.
G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Contractor as required by Section 8 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Contractor pursuant to the Construction Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.
H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a "claims made" policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Developer shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen ( 18) months after the completion of the Work.
I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Developer shall immediately notify City's Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Developer shall submit a written report to City's Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: l) name and address of injured - l I -
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Developer's insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.
SECTION 9. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2778, Developer shall cause the Construction Contract to include provisions that require the Contractor, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of the Work, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
B. The Contractor's obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Contractor's inability to evaluate liability. The Construction Contract shall provide that Contractor shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City. If the Contractor fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered by City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Contractor accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Developer or Contractor herein.
C. The Contractor's obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.
D. The Construction Contract shall provide that the City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Contractor pursuant to this Section to represent City's interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.
SECTION 10. PREVAILING WAGE LAW COMPLIANCE
A. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Developer is advised that the work contemplated in this contract related to construction is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) California Department oflndustrial Relations. Developer shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777 .5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815 of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Sections 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.
B. No Contractor, sub-contractor, or consultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725 .5. No Contractor, sub-contractor, or consultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725. 5.
All Contractors, sub-contractors, or consultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Developer is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
C. Developer shall cause the language set forth herein to be included in the Construction Contract and contract with the Construction Manager.
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Reimbursement Agreement on the days and year set forth below:
Dated:
ATTEST:
~~ AMELA MIZE, City Clerk
Dated: , 2023 ------
CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
By: MICHAEL DACQUISTO, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BARRY E. DeWALT
City Attorney
SIERRA PACIFIC LAND & TIMBER
COMPANY
,/1 /'174, ·; / .· I ,
/ i'// I l, / /' f/_, I / • h~, I /
By: M.D. EMMERSO
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Agreement (C-9727) (4.11(c)--Acceptance for Trinity Street Sewer Reimbursement Agreement)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the sole-source purchase of all City of Redding Rotamix Mixing Systems and find that the name Rotamix in the specifications for maintenance and Public Works projects is authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2) in order to match other products in use by the City.
Fiscal Impact
The typical cost of the Vaughan RotamixSystem® (System) ranges between $80,000 to $95,000 per unit. The purchase of this System is purchased as needed.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to make a finding to sole source all Vaughan RotamixSystems®. The City of Redding (City) would then use the practice of incorporating various brands or “or equal” products procured by low bid per PCC 3400(b). This would require additional inventory, training and other additional costs for each brand or trade name.
Background/Analysis
The System is a mechanical hydraulic system that is used in sludge tanks, digesters, and other similar applications with several features to keep th e City wastewater operations running efficiently. This System allows for continued mixing of the digesters with out moving parts inside the tank creating a reliable , low maintenance and cost-effective system. The Wastewater Utility currently has this System in use within all three primary digesters at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. The current upgrades needed on the secondary digester with the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operations ( RODEO) Project will require a mixing system to be ins talled. Staff recommends matching the currently installed equipment within the primary digesters in order to maximize spare parts, training and efficiency.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve the Sole -Source Purchase of the Rotamix Mixing Systems for the City of Redding
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 236
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve the Sole-Source Purchase of the Rotamix Mixing System Page 2
In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2), the Council may make a finding for a m aterial, product, or service by specific brand or trade name in order to match other products in use on a particular public improvement completed or in the course of completion.
Such finding would allow the benefits described above to be realized and are i n the best interest of the City.
Environmental Review
This act ion is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Packet Pg. 237
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution to increase R edding Electric Utility’s rates ( 4.5 percent revenue increase per year) effective April 1, 2026, January 1 , 2027, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2029, for usage beginning on the first day of the first electric billing cycle; (2) Approve a Network Access Charge Credit increase of $21.00 per month to Residential Energy Discount Program customers effective April 1, 2026, $22.00 per month effective January 1 , 2027, $23.00 per month effective January 1 , 2028, and $24.00 per month effective January 1, 2029, for usage beginning on the first day of the first electric billing cycle;
(3) Approve an Energy Discount increase to $0.0586/kWh (37.50 percent) per month to Residential Energy Discount Program customers effective April 1, 2026, $0.0655/kWh (40.00 percent) per month effective January 1 , 2027, $0.0732/kWh (42.50 percent) per month effective January 1 , 2028, and $0.0816/kWh (45.00 percent) per month effective January 1, 2029, up to 450 kWh maximum, for usage beginning on the first day of the first electric billing cycle; and
(4) Find that the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under the common-sense clause.
Fiscal Impact
Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) current biennial budget, adopted by the Council on June 17, 2025, included a five-year financial plan. The financial plan included a five percent rate increase every year through 2030. After several months of analysis, which resulted in operational, capital, and administrative savings both realized and anticipated, staff has modified their proposal to four and one-half percent increases through 2029, with a two percent increase projected in 2030.
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2026
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Public Hearing to consider Resolution approving City of Redding Electric Utility (REU) rate increases and increasing the Residential Energy Discount.
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 238
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments Page 2
Periodic rate adjustments are necessary to sustain adequate operating reserves in light of ongoing capital investment needs, inflationary cost pressures, and significant increases in power supply components (energy, capacity, and environmental attributes) . Under the City Council’s REU Financial Management Policy, the reserve target is 150 days of cash on hand, comprised of 75 days for Operating Costs, 30 days for System Critical Failure, and 45 days for Rate Stabilization.
Without the recommended rate adjustments or a commensurate expenditure decrease, i.e., eliminating the capital improvement program and wildfire mitigation program, expenses will exceed revenues, depleting reserves.
Adequate funding is available within the Public Benefits Program budget to provide for the proposed increase in benefits for Residential Energy Discount Program participants.
Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to adopt the resolution and provide alternative direction to staff.
As stated in the fiscal impact, without the recommended rate adjustments, expenses will exceed revenues, deplete reserves, cause REU to fall short of the Council’s Financial Management Policy minimum reserves requirement, and likely impact the utility’s bond rating.
Background/Analysis
REU increased rates in 2024 and 2025 by four percent per year to address aging infrastructure, rising power supply costs, inflationary pressures including adjustments to labor contra cts, and to fund REU’s Senate Bill 901 Wildfire Mitigation Plan. Continued infrastructure replacement and associated debt service, along with rising power supply costs driven by California’s clean energy mandates, the phaseout of tax credits, and tariffs o n clean energy technologies, continue to drive the need for additional rate increases. REU has mitigated these cost pressures to the extent possible by identifying personnel savings, reducing capital expenditures, and capping controllable operations and ma intenance cost growth below inflation through reductions in discretionary spending.
The effect of the proposed changes on each customer’s utility bill will depend on several factors, including how much electricity is used each month. On average, standard residential customers are expected to see an increase of approximately $7 per month in 2026 and 2027, and approximately $8 per month in 2028 and 2029. In addition, staff recommend s increasing the Residential Energy Discount (Public Benefits Program) for all Residential and Residential Multi- Family customers, mitigating a portion of the rate increase for income -qualified customers funded by the State mandated public benefits charge . The enhancements to the Residential Energy Discount Program will , on average, limit the annual increase in monthly electric bills to less than $1.50 per month for income -qualified customers . Commercial customers will experience varying impacts due to differences in their energy usage and business size.
Staff projections show that REU would remain the lowest electric provider in the area, with standard residential bills for REU, Shasta Lake, and PG&E currently at $160, $188, and $344, respectively, and all utilities projecting rate increases annually through 2029.
Packet Pg. 239
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments Page 3
In preparing this recommendation, staff evaluated REU’s established rate philosophy and rate structure, utility forecasting assumptions, and projected revenues to determine the need for these increases. Following their participation in the development of REU’s 2030 Str ategic Plan, five community members from the original nine -person panel, representing a cross -section of REU’s customer base, continued their involvement through a two -part meeting series to review REU’s budget, financial plan, cost -of-service study, and p roposed rate plan. The panel reached consensus that the proposed rate increases are appropriate, fair, and equitable, and provide the best balance of affordability, rate stability, and long-term financial health of the Utility.
As previously mentioned, Co uncil approved REU’s biennial budget on June 17, 2025. That budget, covering fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27, included the following financial plan:
Packet Pg. 240
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments Page 4
Accompanying the plan, were the following notes:
While the Fed remains committed to this tar get, recent economic conditions have introduced uncertainties. As of early 2025, inflation has moderated but remains slightly above the 2% target, with core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation at 2.8%. Consequently, the current five -year plan uses a target inflation rate of 3%. Assuming 3% for future projections is a prudent approach, considering ongoing inflationary pressures and uncertainties related to global supply chains, recent tariff implementations, and geopolitical factors. Other assumptions include bond-funding capital outlay, and excluding Power Supply, only expending approximately 90% of O&M and Personnel appropriations. The days of cash on hand are projected to be 148 days in FY26 and 161 days in FY27. While both projections exceed the required minimum level of 75 days, in FY26, it falls below the goal of 150 days.
The debt service coverage ratio is expected to be 1.57 times in FY26 and 1.79 times in FY27.
Although the FY26 and FY27 projections are below the required minimum of 1.80 times, the Financial Policy recognizes a practical range of acceptable results, balancing cash flow needs with reserve levels. The Utility’s Affordability KPI remains well within the target range throughout the five years.
Following that approval, staff has undertaken significant measures to reduce costs and strengthen the Utility’s financial position.
Rather than assuming a 3 percent annual inflation factor, staff has capped allowable inflationary growth at 2 percent. Any expense increases exceeding 2 p ercent will require corresponding reductions in operations and maintenance.
Additional cost-containment actions include:
• Initiating the refinancing of the Utility’s 2015 bonds, which became callable in December 2025. See change in Total Net Debt Service between plans.
• Eliminating customer programs previously funded by Cap -and-Trade revenues, allowing approximately $4 million to be redirected toward compliance costs that would otherwise have required rate funding. See increase in Miscellaneous Income, n ow titled “Interest Income and Transfers from Restricted”.
• Reducing planned capital outlay by approximately $24 million over the five -year planning horizon. See reductions in Capital Projects.
• Leaving select vacancies unfilled and not backfilling certai n planned retirements, generating approximately $1.6 million in annual savings . See reductions in the System Administration line item under Operating Expense s, which also includes a reduction in “allowable inflationary growth”.
Packet Pg. 241
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments Page 5
Collectively, these actions — categorized as reduced capital expenditures and lower operations and maintenance costs — have resulted in the following updated financial plan that reduces planned rate increases of 5% annually through 2030, to 4.5% through 2029 and 2% in 2030:
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Electric Utility Fund Beginning Balance $ 45.2 $ 50.7 $ 57.3 $ 62.6 $ 61.8 Retail Sales (gWh) 743 751 763 778 796
Rate Adjustments 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 2%
Revenues ($ Mil)
Retail 146.4 154.5 163.7 174.1 183.3 Wholesale 12.7 12.2 13.2 16.4 16.3 Miscellaneous 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 Total 161.4 169.0 179.2 192.8 201.9 Operating Expenses ($ Mil)
Power Supply 80.5 81.9 91.1 98.6 102.2 System Administration 20.1 18.8 19.2 19.6 20.1 Transmission and Distribution 36.5 37.7 38.5 39.3 40.0 Total 137.2 138.5 148.9 157.5 162.3 Net Operating Revenue 24.1 30.5 30.3 35.4 39.6 Total Net Debt Service 18.6 19.1 18.1 18.7 19.2 Revenue Remaining after Debt Service 5.5 11.5 12.2 16.7 20.4 Other Revenues & Expenses
Interest Income and Transfers from Restricted 3.6 3.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 Bond Proceeds 26.7 13.2 10.3 - - Capital Projects (19.5) (11.6) (8.9) (9.1) (9.3) In-Lieu (6.0) (6.9) (7.1) (7.3) (7.5) Rolling Stock and Major Maintenance (4.9) (3.1) (3.0) (3.0) (3.1) Total (0.1) (4.8) (6.9) (17.5) (17.9) Increase (Decrease) in Funds ($ Mil) 5.4 6.6 5.3 (0.8) 2.4 Reconciliation to Cash Flow
Electric Utility Fund Ending Balance ($ Mil) $ 50.7 $ 57.3 $ 62.6 $ 61.8 $ 64.3 Reserves (Days of Cash on Hand) 130 148 150 141 142
Current Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.37 1.64 1.73 1.95 2.12 Affordability KPI (Target <2.5% of Median Income) 1.83% 1.90% 1.96% 2.03% 2.08%
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN
Fiscal Years Ending June 30
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 242
Report to Redding City Council February 26, 2026
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments Page 6
Attachments
Resolution & Attachment A
02.17.26 Staff Report 9.5(b) - Set Public Hearing
Rate Book April 2026
Rate Book January 2027
Rate Book January 2028
Rate Book January 2029
2026-2027 Biennial Budget - REU ONLY
Council Memo - REU Rates 2026
2026 Residential Rates Example
2026 Residential Energy Discount Example
2026 Small Commercial Calculator Example
2026 Large Commercial Calculator Example
2026 REU Rate Increase FAQs
2026 Rates Press Release
FY2021-FY2030 Budget_Actuals Table
Production Cost Model 10-Year Outlook
Production Cost Model
REU Indirect Position Increases Since 2016
REU Position Increases Since 2016
REU_Letter Report_Final
Packet Pg. 243
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING ELECTRIC
UTILITY RATES SCHEDULE FOR SERVICE TO CUSTOMERS WITHIN
THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF REDDING
WHEREAS:
A. Section 14.22.170 of the Redding Municipal Code provides that the City Council shall establish electric utility rates by resolution; and
B. For the reasons set out in t he report to the Council, it has been recommended that the City Council adopt new, increased electric utility rates incorporated herein by reference; and
C. The City Council has carefully considered this recommendation ; reviewed the existing electric utility rate structures; considered the rate study conducted by NewGen Strategies & Solutions, LLC; and deems it to be in the best interest of the City of Redding to establish the new, revised, and adjusted electric rates as set forth in the Electric Utility Rate Schedule (Exhibit A);
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as findings of fact and are true and correct.
2. The City Council hereby adopts the methodology, reasoning, and analysis set forth in the rate study conducted by NewGen Strategies & S olutions, LLC, incorporated herein by this reference, in support of the rate adoption established by this Resolution.
3. Pursuant to Section 14.22.170 of the Redding Municipal Code, the City Council hereby adopts the rates and fixed charges set forth in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein , and directs staff to incorporate the same into the electric utility rate tariffs appropriately.
4. That the purpose for the imposition of the increases and other changes are as follows : (1) to obtain funds for capita l projects necessary to maintain service reliability and improve electrical infrastructure; (2) to meet escalating fuel and power expenses; (3) to meet operating expenses and to fund State-mandated programs; and (4) to meet financial reserve needs and requirements.
5. That the increases to electric utility rates set forth herein do not, and will not when implemented, exceed the cost of providing service to REU customers.
6. That the City Clerk and the Financial Officer of the City of Redding are hereby directed to maintain available certified copies of this resolution in their respective offices for inspection and review by any interested persons or persons.
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Resolution & Attachment A (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of March 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Resolution & Attachment A (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Proposed Residential Rates (E1)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Network Access
Charge
($/Meter)
$40.00 $41.00 $42.00 $43.00 $44.00
Energy Charge
($/kWh) $0.1492 $0.1563 $0.1637 $0.1723 $0.1814
Proposed Residential Energy Discount Rates (E1LP)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Network Access
Charge
($/Meter)
($20.00) ($21.00) ($22.00) ($23.00) ($24.00)
Energy Charge
Discount
($/kWh) [450
kWh Max]
($0.0522) ($0.0586) ($0.0655) ($0.0732) ($0.0816)
Proposed Multi-Family Residential Rates (E1M)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Network Access
Charge
($/Meter)
$38.00 $39.00 $40.00 $41.00 $42.00
Energy Charge
($/kWh) $0.1492 $0.1563 $0.1637 $0.1723 $0.1814
Proposed Residential Master Metered Rates (E5)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Network Access
Charge
($/Meter)
$450.00 $460.00 $470.00 $480.00 $490.00
Energy Charge
($/kWh) $0.1492 $0.1563 $0.1637 $0.1723 $0.1814
Exhibit A
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Resolution & Attachment A (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Proposed Small Commercial (E2)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Network Access
Charge
($/Meter)
$70.00 $72.00 $74.00 $77.00 $80.00
Energy Charge
($/kWh) $0.1649 $0.1725 $0.1804 $0.1885 $0.1970
Proposed Large Commercial (E7/E8)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Network Access
Charge
($/Meter)
$95.00 $95.00 $95.00 $95.00 $95.00
Energy Charge
($/kWh) $0.1086 $0.1158 $0.1234 $0.1308 $0.1387
Demand Charge
($/kW) $21.50 $21.50 $21.50 $21.75 $22.00
Proposed Fixed Usage (E9)
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Minimum
Monthly Bill $20.75 $20.75 $20.75 $20.75 $20.75
Energy Charge
($/kWh) $0.2718 $0.2840 $0.2968 $0.3102 $0.3241
Proposed Standby Demand
Rate Component Current
Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
Charge ($/kW) $14.74 $14.74 $14.74 $14.74 $14.74
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Resolution & Attachment A (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Proposed Streetlight (Nightlight)-Installed by City (E9EL) Lamp Size Current Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
70 watts high-pressure sodium $22.36 $23.37 $24.42 $25.52 $26.66 100 watts high-pressure sodium $31.65 $33.07 $34.56 $36.12 $37.74 150 watts high-pressure sodium $33.24 $34.74 $36.30 $37.93 $39.64 200 watts high-pressure sodium $36.06 $37.68 $39.38 $41.15 $43.00 250 watts high-pressure sodium $38.69 $40.43 $42.25 $44.15 $46.14 400 watts high-pressure sodium $42.92 $44.85 $46.87 $48.98 $51.18 175 watts mercury vapor $34.46 $36.01 $37.63 $39.32 $41.09 250 watts mercury vapor $38.69 $40.43 $42.25 $44.15 $46.14 400 watts mercury vapor $42.92 $44.85 $46.87 $48.98 $51.18 1,000 watts mercury vapor $60.80 $63.54 $66.40 $69.38 $72.51 1,500 watts mercury vapor $82.94 $86.67 $90.57 $94.65 $98.91 20-35 watts light emitting diode $24.03 $25.11 $26.24 $27.42 $28.66 35-50 watts light emitting diode $27.37 $28.60 $29.89 $31.23 $32.64 50-65 watts light emitting diode $30.13 $31.49 $32.90 $34.38 $35.93 65-80 watts light emitting diode $31.38 $32.79 $34.27 $35.81 $37.42 80-95 watts light emitting diode $34.21 $35.75 $37.36 $39.04 $40.80 95-110 watts light emitting diode $35.74 $37.35 $39.03 $40.79 $42.62 110-135 watts light emitting diode $37.57 $39.26 $41.03 $42.87 $44.80 135-170 watts light emitting diode $41.07 $42.92 $44.85 $46.87 $48.98 170-225 watts light emitting diode $43.54 $45.50 $47.55 $49.69 $51.92 225-350 watts light emitting diode $49.05 $51.26 $53.56 $55.97 $58.49 350-500 watts light emitting diode $57.69 $60.29 $63.00 $65.83 $68.80
Proposed Streetlight (Nightlight)-Installed by Customer (E9EL)
Lamp Size Current Rate
Proposed
4/1/26
Proposed
1/1/27
Proposed
1/1/28
Proposed
1/1/29
70 watts high-pressure sodium $7.27 $7.60 $7.94 $8.30 $8.67 100 watts high-pressure sodium $9.27 $9.69 $10.12 $10.58 $11.05 150 watts high-pressure sodium $11.93 $12.47 $13.03 $13.61 $14.23 200 watts high-pressure sodium $14.32 $14.96 $15.64 $16.34 $17.08 250 watts high-pressure sodium $16.73 $17.48 $18.27 $19.09 $19.95 400 watts high-pressure sodium $23.80 $24.87 $25.99 $27.16 $28.38
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Resolution & Attachment A (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve setting a Public Hearing on March 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider increases in Redding Electric Utility rates (four and one -half percent increase per year) effective beginning with the April 1, 2026, billing cycle and continuing with the January 1, 2027, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2029, billing cycles, along with an increase to the Residential Energy Discount benefit for income -qualified households.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with setting the public hearing.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to set the public hearing as proposed and provide further direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
Redding Electric Utility (REU) increased rates in 2024 and 2025 by four percent per year to address aging infrastructure, rising power supply costs, inflationary pressures, and to fund REU’s Senate Bill 901 Wildfire Mitigation Plan. Continued infrastructure replacement and associated debt service, along with rising power supply costs driven by California’s clean energy mandates, the phaseout of tax credits, and tariffs on clean energy technologies, continue to drive the need for additional rate increases. REU has mitigated these cost pressures to the extent possible by identifying personnel savings, reducing capital expenditures, and capping controllable operations and maintenance cost growth below inflation through reductions in discretionary spending.
REU’s current biennial budget, adopted by the Council on June 17, 202 5, included a five -year MEETING DATE: February 17, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.5(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.5(b)--Consider setting a Public Hearing for March 3, 2026, regarding Redding Electric Utility rate increases.
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: 02.17.26 Staff Report 9.5(b) - Set Public Hearing (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments) Report to Redding City Council February 9, 2026
Re: 9.5(b)--Set Public Hearing regarding REU rate increases Page 2
financial plan. The financial plan included a five percent rate increase every year through 2030.
After several months of analysis, which resulted in operational, capital, and administrative savings both realized and anticipated, staff has modified their proposal to four and one -half percent increases through 2029, with a two percent increase projected in 2030.
The effect of the proposed changes on each customer’s utility bill will depend on several factors, including how much electricity is used each month. On average, standard residential customers are expected to see an increase of approximately $7 per month in 2026 and 2027, and approximately $8 per month in 2028 and 2029. In addition, staff will recommend increasing the Residential Energy Discount (Public Benefits Program) for all Residential and Residential Multi- Family customers, mitigating a portion of the rate increase for income- qualified customers funded by the State mandated public benefits charge (approximately $500,000 of additional funds will be made available to participants in the program on an annual basis). Commercial customers will experience varying impacts due to differences in their energy usage and business size.
REU will provide tables and calculators to the public before the public hearing. These tools will be accessible on the City's website and at two separate public workshops. They will display estimated changes in bills for different types of customers. Customers can also enter their own energy usage to see how these changes may affect them.
Staff projections show that REU would remain the lowest electric provider in the area, with standard residential bills for REU, Shasta Lake, and PG&E currently at $160, $188, and $344, respectively and all utilities projecting rate increases annually through 2029.
Following their participation in the development of REU’s 2030 Strategic Plan, five community members from the original nine -person panel, representing a cross -section of REU’s customer base, continued their involvement through a two -part meeting series to review REU’s budget, financial plan, cost -of-service study, and proposed rate plan. The panel reached consensus that the proposed rate increases are appropriate, fair, and equitable, and provide the best balance of affordability, rate stability, and long-term financial health of the Utility.
Additional public workshops will be held prior to the public hearing, both in- person and web- based, to ensure inclusion, and information will be provided directly to community- based organizations.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: 02.17.26 Staff Report 9.5(b) - Set Public Hearing (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-1 Effective April 1, 2026
SCHEDULE OF RATES – SECTION A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELECTRIC SERVICES PAGE
General Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................... A-2
Residential Service (E1) ............................................................................................................. A-3
Residential Multi-Family Service (E1M) .................................................................................... A-4
Residential Energy Discount (E1LP) ......................................................................................... A-5
Residential Master Metered Service (E5) ................................................................................... A-7
Small Commercial Service (E2) ................................................................................................. A-8
Large Commercial Service (E7) or (E8) ..................................................................................... A-9
Fixed Usage Service (E9) ......................................................................................................... A-11
Streetlight (Nightlight) Service (E9EL) .................................................................................... A-12
Standby Demand Service ......................................................................................................... A-14
Economic Development Service .............................................................................................. A-15
Economic Attraction Service .................................................................................................... A-16
Renewable Resource Net Metering Service (E*NET) .............................................................. A-17
Zero Net Energy Service (E*ZNE) ........................................................................................... A-19
Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) ................................................................................................ A-20
Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) .................................................................................. A-22
State Regulatory Surcharge (STATE) ...................................................................................... A-24
Glossary .................................................................................................................................... A-25 Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-2 Effective April 1, 2026
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE
AVAILABILITY
The electric services provided herein are available throughout the entire City of Redding (Redding) service area where the Redding Electric Utility (REU) facilities are available, of adequate capacity, and adjacent to the premises.
As specified below, certain services are available only to existing customers and other new customers meeting specific operating and use criteria, as presented within each electric service definition.
TAX CLAUSE
Any necessary adjustments for taxes or government fees, whether currently in effect or potentially imposed in the future, which are based on Redding's gross revenues, the price or revenue from the sale of electric energy or services, and/or the volume of energy generated or purchased for sale, will be included in the charges calculated according to the relevant service rate schedules.
PAYMENT
Bills for all electric services will be rendered monthly. A typical meter reading period will not be less than 25 days or more than 35 days. A typical billing period will not be less than 27 days or more than 33 days.
Redding has the option to read residential service meters every two months , and for the months in between, the bill will be based on an estimated kilowatt-hour (kWh) consumption.
Bills will be deemed delinquent if unpaid 20 days after the date of mailing pursuant to Chapter 14.20 of the City of Redding Municipal Code.
Special payment provisions for specific service schedules will be included in the respective schedule outlines.
EFFECTIVE DATES
Certain rates, fees, and/or schedules contained herein are represented with effective dates, such as April 1, 2026. Any such representation is to be interpreted as the respective rate, fee, and/or schedule and is effective in the first billing cycle within the given month’s revenue period.
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-3 Effective April 1, 2026
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE – (E1)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates , plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
April 1, 2026
Fixed Charge $41.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1563
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric services provided for any single -family dwelling or mobile home separately metered by Redding.
Service for dwellings where home care for six or fewer handicapped persons or elderly is provided and such facilities comply with Sections 5115 - 5116 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code and Sections 1569.84 - 1569.85 of the California Health and Safety Code , shall be served under this rate for Residential Service.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 04/01/26 - 04/30/26
Total Energy Use 800 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1563 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $125.04
Fixed Charge $41.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $166.04
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-4 Effective April 1, 2026
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SERVICE – (E1M)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
April 1, 2026
Fixed Charge $39.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1563
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric service provided for any multi-family dwelling separately metered by Redding or master metered multi -family facilities providing single-phase residential electric service to all individual tenants that is not sub-metered. Multi-family is defined as a single building that contains two or more dwelling units.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
Three-phase master metered multi-family facilities that are not sub -metered and provide single -phase residential electric service to all individual tenants shall be served under this rate with a meter charge multiplied by the number of dwelling units.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Multi-Family Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 04/01/26 - 04/30/26
Total Energy Use 800 8000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1563 $0.1563 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $125.04 $1,250.40
Number of Dwellings
Behind Meter
1 10
Fixed Charge $39.00 $390.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $164.04 $1,640.40
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-5 Effective April 1, 2026
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT – (E1LP)
AVAILABILITY
The Residential Energy Discount is only available to Redding residents who are customers of REU that meet the qualifications outlined below and can be applied to only one location per qualified applicant.
DISCOUNT
The Residential Energy Discount will be a $21.00 reduction of the applicable monthly Fixed Charge and a
37.5% reduction of the Energy Charge for the first 450 kWh of energy used in each billing period, as computed using the Residential Fixed and Energy charges in effect at the time of billing.
Residential Energy Discount Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 04/01/26 - 04/30/26
Total Energy Use 450 kWh Or 900 kWh
Base Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1563 $70.34 $140.67
Energy Discount kWh (450 kWh max) 450 kWh 450 kWh
Energy Discount Credit 37.5% ($0.0586) ($26.37) ($26.37) Total Energy Charge $43.97 $114.30
Base Fixed Charge $41.00 /mo. $41.00 /mo.
Fixed Charge Credit ($21.00) /mo. ($21.00) /mo.
Fixed Charge $20.00 /mo. $20.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $63.97 $134.30
APPLICABILITY
This service is available to individually metered single -phase electric residential service provided to any single-family dwelling, apartment, or mobile home upon completion of the qualification process described below.
Any service that is master -metered shall have the option to enter into a separate agreement with the City, which provides that any credit would be fully passed on to the qualifying household(s) within the master - metered service. Such services would include, but not be limited to: mobile home parks, senior housing residences, and non-profit housing of qualified households.
The Residential Energy Discount will become effective at the beginning of the billing period after qualification is met.
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-6 Effective April 1, 2026
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT (continued)
QUALIFICATIONS
As published by the State of California's Housing and Community Development Department, the total gross annual income for all persons in the applicant’s household may not exceed sixty (60) percent of Shasta County median income. The table below presents the most recent data, currently in effect.
Maximum Annual Household Income Levels for 20261
A customer shall be removed from the Residential Energy Discount and not eligible to re -apply for a period of twelve months for any of the following reasons:
1. Any evidence of service tampering or meter tampering.
2. Failure to re-certify qualification at any time requested to do so by the City of Redding.
3. Provision of false information during qualification or recertification.
A customer subject to removal from the Residential Energy Discount program can appeal that removal by requesting a review by the REU Director or his designee.
This Residential Energy Discount shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7 ½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
1 Updated (07/2025) by the State of California-HCUD
Number of Persons in
Household
60% of Median Income
Monthly Annual
1 $3,563 $42,750
2 $4,073 $48,870
3 $4,580 $54,960
4 $5,090 $61,080
5 $5,498 $65,970
6 $5,905 $70,860
7 $6,313 $75,750
8 $6,720 $80,640
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-7 Effective April 1, 2026
RESIDENTIAL MASTER METERED SERVICE – (E5)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
April 1, 2026
Fixed Charge $460.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1563
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to facilities that are served through master meters and provide single -phase, sub- metered, residential electric service to all individual tenants.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single-phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. Primary metering may be used by mutual agreement. However, any available primary service discount shall not apply to such service.
Miscellaneous electrical loads, such as general lighting, laundry room, general maintenance , and other similar usage incidental to the operation of a multifamily residential complex or accommodation , will be considered domestic usage and supplied in accordance with the applicable service rate.
Residential Master Metered Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 04/01/26 - 04/30/26
Total Energy Use 25,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1563 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $3,907.50
Fixed Charge $460.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $4,367.50
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-8 Effective April 1, 2026
SMALL COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E2)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
April 1, 2026
Fixed Charge $72.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1725
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that does not exceed 25 kW for 7 months or more out of the previous 12-month period and does not surpass 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all general power and lighting services, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer, subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Small Commercial Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 04/01/26 - 04/30/26
Total Energy Use 2,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1725 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $345.00
Fixed Charge $72.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $417.00
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-9 Effective April 1, 2026
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E7) or (E8)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that exceeds 25 kW for 6 months or more out of the previous 12-month period or exceeds 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all facilities providing general power and lighting service, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable or available for electric resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Effective Date
April 1, 2026
Fixed Charge $95.00 per meter, per month
Energy Charges $0.1158 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Demand Charge $21.50 per kW
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-10 Effective April 1, 2026
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE (continued)
PRIMARY/TRANSMISSION SERVICE DISCOUNT – (E*P3)
When delivery is made , and energy is metered at a primary or transmission voltage, the following discount shall be applied to the sum of the demand and energy charges. Service at 2,400 volts is not available to new customers requesting service after September 21, 1993.
Discount
Service at 115,000 volts....................... 10% Service at 12,000 volts......................... 3% Service at 2,400 volts........................... 3%
POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT – (E8)
When the billing demand has exceeded 500 kW for 3 consecutive months and thereafter until it has fallen below 300 kW for 12 consecutive months, bills will be adjusted for the weighted monthly average power factor as follows: That portion of the monthly charge comprising the Demand Charge and the Energy Charge, including the Primary Service Discount, if applicable, will be decreased or increased, respectively, by 0.25 percent for each 1 percent that the average power factor of customer's load in the month was greater or less than 95 percent, such average power factor (to the nearest whole percent) is to be computed from the ratio of lagging kilovolt -ampere-hours to kilowatt -hours consumed in the month. All expenses for the installation and/or modification of the customers' facilities to accommodate VAR -hour metering shall be paid by the customer.
Large Commercial Service Bill Calculation Examples
Billing Period 04/01/26 – 04/30/26
Energy Use (kWh) 25,000 kWh Or 200,000 kWh
Monthly Demand (kW) 100 kW 500 kW
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1158 /kWh $0.1158 /kWh
Total Energy Charges $2,895.00 $23,160.00
Demand Charge ($/kW) $21.50 /kW $21.50 /kW
Total Demand Charges $2,150.00 $10,750.00
Fixed Charge $95.00 /mo. $95.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $5,140.00 $34,005.00
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-11 Effective April 1, 2026
FIXED USAGE SERVICE – (E9)
AVAILABILITY
After April 1, 1985, this rate is only available for existing continuous usage rate services. New, decorative, sign, or other night -lighting services shall have metering equipment installed and be served under the applicable rate.
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rate plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
The monthly energy usage for applicable services shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum nameplate load rating of the device being served by either:
a. 730 hours for continuous usage service; or
b. 333 hours for dusk to dawn service.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to electric service where metering equipment is not installed. Usage must be at a fixed rate or be subject to a flat-rate contract.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
Effective Date
April 1, 2026
Energy Charge $0.2840 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Minimum Monthly Bill $20.75
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-12 Effective April 1, 2026
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE – (E9EL)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following flat rate plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
Cost per lamp if
installed by:
Lamp Size City Customer Effective Date 04/01/2026 04/01/2026
70 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $23.37 $7.27 100 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $33.07 $9.27 150 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $34.74 $11.93 200 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $37.68 $14.32 250 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $40.43 $16.73 400 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $44.85 $23.80
Cost Per City
Lamp Size Installed Lamp Effective Date 04/01/2026
175 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $36.01 250 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $40.43 400 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $44.85 1,000 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $63.54 1,500 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $86.67
Cost Per City
Lamp Size Installed Lamp Effective Date 04/01/2026
20-35 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $25.11 35-50 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $28.60 50-65 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $31.49 65-80 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $32.79 80-95 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $35.75 95-110 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $37.35 110-135 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $39.26 135-170 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $42.92 170-225 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $45.50 225-350 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $51.26 350-500 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $60.29
Mercury vapor lamps described above are no longer available for new installations. For lighting efficiency and energy conservation, all existing mercury vapor lamps will be replaced with comparable high -pressure sodium vapor lamps when servicing is necessary.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all unmetered outdoor lights maintained by REU on streets and highways and for all individual customers who request night lighting on private property where adequate City -owned facilities for light fixture mounting already exist.
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-13 Effective April 1, 2026
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE (continued)
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three -wire, nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU. The lamp, luminaries, control device, bracket, and pole/standard will be maintained by REU. A lamp will be controlled to operate from dusk to dawn each night giving approximately 333 hours of lighting service per month.
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-14 Effective April 1, 2026
STANDBY DEMAND SERVICE
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable, at REU’s option, to all customers on the Large Commercial Service rate schedule who utilize their own generation to meet any portion of their electrical supply needs with an electric generation resource that is: 1) installed on the Customer’s side of the delivery point; 2) and interconnected with load that REU may be required to serve on an as needed basis . The customer’s generation system will be used to offset the customer’s energy and if applicable, demand requirements, supplied by REU to the customer. REU reserves the right to limit the number of Customers allowed to interconnect generation systems and equipment on an individual electric circuit or substation.
CHARGES
The customer will be billed for all energy service purchased from REU under the applicable rate schedule.
In addition, the Standby Demand charge shown below will be included on each of the Customer’s periodic utility bills:
Effective Date: April 1, 2026
$14.74 per kW
This charge will be a monthly charge based on the Standby Demand as determined below.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the Customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
STANDBY DEMAND
The highest monthly recorded d emand reading for a 12 -month period directly preceding the customer’s transition to the Standby Demand Service regardless of the time of day or the day of week of the reading. If monthly demand readings are not available for each of the 12 months preceding the customers’ transition to the Standby Demand Service, REU will estimate the maximum demand based on the customer’s existing kwh usage and/or comparison of similar loads within the REU system. REU will reevaluate this Standby Demand on an annual basis and will increase or decrease the Standby Demand as appropriate.
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-15 Effective April 1, 2026
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICE (EDS)
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to any new customer whose monthly billing demand is expected to exceed 100 kW for 3 months out of a consecutive 12 -month period or to any existing customer whose monthly billing demand is expected to increase by 100 kW for 3 months out of a consecutive 12-month period.
For the purpose of this service, a customer is defined as a business bringing entirely new electric load into the City. A business that changes location within the service territory or a business enterprise under ownership does not qualify as new a business.
This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
Qualified customers will be eligible for any and all service discounts available to commercial service customers including, but not limited to, the Primary/Transmission Service Discount and the Power Factor Adjustment.
EDS DISCOUNT
The monthly bill at the commercial rate, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto will be discounted as follows:
Discount: Year 1 (Billing cycle 1 through 12) = 25%
Year 2 (Billing cycle 13 through 24) = 20%
Year 3 (Billing cycle 25 through 36) = 15%
Year 4 (Billing cycle 37 through 48) = 10%
Year 5 (Billing cycle 49 through 60) = 5%
The Discount will end after 60 billing cycles.
In no event shall the cost of power to the customer fall below REU’s average cost to supply power to that customer.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The customer will be required to sign a 5 -year contract. If a customer covered under this schedule leaves before the expiration of the contract, penalties as established in the Council Policy regarding electric incentives for economic development shall apply.
A customer wishing to avail themselves of this service must apply for service within one year of becoming eligible, or lose that eligibility.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. All meter - recording equipment shall be supplied and maintained by REU. Any expense to modify the customer's facilities to accommodate the meter-recording equipment shall be paid by the customer.
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-16 Effective April 1, 2026
ECONOMIC ATTRACTION SERVICE
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to any customer who is considered a manufacturing or industrial company, and who expects their billing demand in the monthly billing period to be at least 25 kW for 6 months out of a 12- month period or 75 kW in any month out of a 12-month period. In addition, the Economic Attraction Service is not designed for those customers in a retail sales business.
Not applicable to, or available for, resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARGES
A monthly bill will be provided at a rate mutually agreed upon by the company and the REU Director. This rate is negotiated and shall include all costs incurred in serving this customer. The rate shall include all relevant distribution and transmission-related costs, including fixed costs and power supply.
In no event shall the cost of power to the customer fall below the incremental cost of power to REU calculated on a per-kWh basis.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A customer on this schedule will be required to sign a contract. The length of the contract is negotiable. The intention of the Economic Attraction Service is to create a relationship with the customer, and for both parties to honor the terms of the negotiated contract. If, however, a customer covered under this schedule does not honor the terms of the contract, and leaves the REU system for another supplier, the customer may be required to pay a Competitive Transition Charge (CTC).
A customer who wishes to be serviced under this schedule must apply for service within one year of becoming eligible or lose that eligibility.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. All meter - recording equipment shall be supplied and maintained by REU. Any expense to modify the customer's facilities to accommodate the meter-recording equipment shall be paid by the customer.
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-17 Effective April 1, 2026
RENEWABLE RESOURCE NET METERING SERVICE – (E*NET)
APPLICABILITY
Effective January 1, 2020, this rate is no longer available for new generators.
The renewable resource net metering tariff is applicable to residential customers and commercial customers where a part or all of the electrical requirements of the customer can be supplied from a solar , wind, or other eligible customer generator as defined in SB489 and SBX1 2 of not more than 1,000 kilowatts that is owned and operated by the customer. The generator must be connected for parallel operation with the service of REU, it must be located on the customer's premises, and it must be intended to offset part or all of the customer's electrical requirements.
Customers on this tariff will be net metered. Net energy metering measures the difference between the electricity supplied through the electric grid and the electricity generated by an eligible customer -generator and fed back to the grid over a 12-month period.
Customers whose solar and/or wind power production source’s rated capacity or capability exceeds 10 kW, up to 1,000 kW or 1 megawatt, could require development of a co -metering tariff with REU, per statutory requirements, at the sole discretion of REU.
CHARGES
A monthly statement on the applicable residential or commercial service, energy and demand charges will be established for all customers operating under the Net Metering Tariff, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto.
The eligible customer -generator shall be billed each month for the applicable monthly Fixed Charges.
Residential and small commercial customers operating under this service will receive an estimate of net energy charges and/or demand charges due to REU. At the end of the twelve (12) billing cycles following the date of the generator’s final interconnection with the Utility’s system and at the end of each successive twelve (12) billing cycles thereafter, the customer shall receive a bill for any applicable charges for electricity used during the previous 12-month period that are unpaid. The customer -generator shall be compensated for any net surplus energy transmitted during the previ ous 12-month period per Special Conditions #3 below. Large Commercial customers will be provided monthly bills for all applicable services, per State Law.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Generation Interconnection Agreement : An interconnection agreement with the customer is required for service under this schedule. The customer must comply with conditions and terms set forth by REU for the safe and efficient interconnection of equipment with the REU electrical system.
2. Net Energy : Net energy is E S minus E F, where E S is energy supplied by REU and E F is energy generated by the customer and fed back into REU's system at such times as customer generation exceeds customer requirements. If the net energy value resulting from the above computation is positive, an energy charge shall be applied at the rates specified below. If the calculation of net energy yields a negative result, all such net surplus energy shall be considered net surplus energy transmitted and shall be treated as stated in Special Condition No. 3 below. The components of net energy, E S and EF, shall be determined by the use of metering equipment best suited for each facility
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-18 Effective April 1, 2026
RENEWABLE RESOURCE NET-METERING SERVICE (Continued)
or location, as determined by REU. All necessary labor, equipment, materials, and related facilities costs in addition to, or in substitution for, standard City facilities that are required in order to take and sell power through one-meter socket, will be at the customer's expense.
3. Net Surplus Energy Transmitted : Net energy transmitted occurs when the cumulative value of E F exceeds the cumulative value of E S during the entire billing period and is the amount by which the energy generated by the customer and fed back into REU's system exceeds the energy supplied by REU over an entire billing period. In the event the energy generated exceeds the energy consumed during the 12-month period, payment will be made for the net surplus energy delivered to REU’s grid.
This compensation will be based on REU’s current avoided cost for energy ($0.0608 per kWh effective January 1, 2020) and is updated administratively on an annual basis.
4. Payment: Statements of any and all monthly service costs will be provided monthly and bills for service will be rendered annually to customers receiving service under the Residential or Small Commercial tariffs outlined herein, per State Law. However, such customers operating under this rate schedule will be allowed to provide periodic (e.g. monthly or bi -monthly) payments for services rendered, if applicable, to avoid an unbudgeted utility expense. Large Commercial customers will be provided monthly bills for all services received under this service, per State Law.
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-19 Effective April 1, 2026
ZERO NET ENERGY SERVICE – (E*ZNE)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the applicable residential or commercial service and net of a credit applied for any surplus energy transmitted ( $0.0608 per kWh effective January 1, 2020 ). Surplus energy transmitted occurs when on-site generation exceeds on-site consumption and energy is transmitted to the grid (real-time customer energy generation exceeds real-time customer energy consumption). When a customer’s on-site generation meets their on -site consumption, the customer avoids the full utility retail rate. When a customer’s on-site generation does not meet their on -site consumption, the customer is charged at the full retail rate.
APPLICABILITY
The net metering successor tariff is applicable to residential customers and commercial customers where a part or all of the electrical requirements of the customer can be supplied from a solar , wind, or other eligible customer generator as defined in SB489 and SBX1 2 of not more than 1,000 kilowatts that is owned and operated by the customer. The generator must be connected for parallel operation with the service of REU, it must be located on the customer's premises, and it must be intended to offset part or all of the customer's electrical requirements.
Customers whose solar and/or wind power production source’s rated capacity or capability exceeds 10 kW, up to 1,000 kW or 1 megawatt, could require the development of a co-metering tariff with REU, per statutory requirements, at the sole discretion of REU.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
Each service is characterized by the applicable residential or commercial service.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Generation Interconnection Agreement : An interconnection agreement with the customer is required for service under this schedule. The customer must comply with conditions and terms set forth by REU for the safe and efficient interconnection of equipment with the REU electrical system.
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-20 Effective April 1, 2026
POWER COST ADJUSTMENT – (PCA)
PURPOSE
The purpose of this adjustment is to appropriately adjust for increases in REU’s wholesale power costs due to the Revenue Adjustment Clause (RAC) associated with purchases by REU from the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (Western).
APPLICATION OF POWER COST ADJUSTMENT
The monthly Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) dollar amount to be added to each bill shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly PCA Factor. This has not been used since the Interim Rate Surcharge was implemented in 1997.
CALCULATION OF THE POWER COST ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
1. The PCA Factor will be calculated and made effective every June 15 and December 15 to reflect any changes in Western's RAC.
2. If Western's RAC amount, in dollars, is a debit (monies owed to Western by Redding), then:
a. Western's RAC debit will be adjusted by:
(1) Subtracting any amount, in dollars, that is over the PCA Balancing Account's minimum balance of $300,000 as recorded 2 months prior to the effective date of the PCA Factor being calculated; however,
(2) If the 2 months' prior balance of the PCA Balancing Account is below $300,000, then the necessary dollar amount required to restore the account to $300,000 will be added to Western's RAC debit.
b. The adjusted debit dollar amount (as referenced in Section 2.a.) will be divided by the adjusted sum of all retail kilowatt-hour sales for the 6-month period beginning 12 months prior to the effective date of the PCA Factor.
c. The adjusted sum of retail kilowatt-hour sales (as referenced in Section 2.b.) will be determined by multiplying the historical total kilowatt-hour sales by a historical 3-year average annual energy growth factor to reflect REU’s rate of growth in kilowatt-hour sales.
d. The PCA Factor resulting from the calculations in Section 2.b. will be applied as a charge to all retail kilowatt-hour sales on a monthly billing-cycle basis beginning with the effective date of the PCA Factor being calculated.
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-21 Effective April 1, 2026
POWER COST ADJUSTMENT (continued)
e. If the calculation of the PCA Factor results in a debit of less than 0.01 cents per kilowatt-hour, then the PCA Factor will be 0.00 cents per kilowatt-hour. The RAC debits from Western will be paid from the PCA Balancing Account.
3. A PCA Balancing Account shall be maintained as an operating account for the purposes of accommodating the cash-flow fluctuations inherent in the PCA process.
a. Each month when a power bill is rendered from Western, which includes any adjustment for Western's RAC, the account's balance will be calculated as follows:
(1) Subtract Western's monthly RAC charge, in dollars, from the balance which existed at the end of the prior month.
(2) Add the amount, in dollars, recovered from the application of the PCA Factor, which was effective during the prior month. Such amount shall be the product of kilowatt-hours of energy billed during the month and the applicable PCA Factor.
(3) Add the amount, in dollars, of all interest earned on the average balance of the funds in the PCA Balancing Account.
(a) Funds from the monthly collection of the PCA will be invested by the City along with the City's other cash accounts and, therefore, will accrue interest at the average monthly rate paid on the City's variable investment account.
b. Best efforts will be made to maintain a minimum balance in the PCA Balancing Account of $300,000.
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-22 Effective April 1, 2026
FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE – (FES)
APPLICABILITY
This surcharge is applicable to the entire City of Redding service area for all kilowatt-hours billed under all rate schedules.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this surcharge is to appropriately adjust for increases and decreases in the REU’s wholesale power costs due to the Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) imposed by HR429 of the 1993 statutes, which is associated with purchases by the City of Redding from the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (Western).
SURCHARGE
The monthly FES dollar amount to be added to or subtracted from each bill, shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly FES Rate. The FES Rate will become effective the first day of the month for which Western imposes the FES and will change from time to time thereafter, when changes in the FES are imposed by Western.
CALCULATION OF THE SURCHARGE
1. The FES Rate will be determined by multiplying the retail kilowatt-hour purchases of Western energy for the following 6-month period as defined in Section 1.A. by the FES rate charged by Western, then by subtracting from the resultant product the FES Balancing Account as defined in Paragraph 2, the difference will then be divided by the total projected retail kilowatt-hour sales as defined in Section
1.A.
a. Projected kilowatt-hour sales and purchases for FES calculation purposes shall be those amounts projected most recently by REU.
b. If the calculation of the FES Rate results in a surcharge of less than 0.01 cents per kilowatt-hour, then the FES Rate will be 0.00 cents per kilowatt-hour.
2. A FES Balancing Account shall be maintained as an operating account for the purposes of accommodating the cash-flow fluctuations inherent in the FES process.
Each month when a power bill is rendered from Western, which includes any adjustment for Western's FES, the account's balance will be calculated as follows:
a. Subtract Western's monthly FES charge, in dollars, from the balance which existed at the end of the prior month.
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-23 Effective April 1, 2026
FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE (continued)
b. Add the amount, in dollars, recovered from the application of the FES Rate which was effective during the prior month. Such amount shall be the product of kilowatt-hours of energy billed during the month and the applicable FES Rate.
c. Add the amount, in dollars, of all interest earned on the average balance of the funds in the FES Balancing Account.
Funds from the monthly collection of the FES will be invested by the City along with the City's other cash accounts and, therefore, will accrue interest at the average monthly rate paid on the City's variable investment account.
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-24 Effective April 1, 2026
STATE REGULATORY SURCHARGE – (STATE)
PURPOSE
The State Regulatory surcharge or Energy Commission tax was established in 1975 by the State Board of Equalization, pursuant to Sections 40031 et seq., of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, to provide funding for the California Energy Commission.
SURCHARGE
The monthly dollar amount to be added to or subtracted from each bill shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly State surcharge rate. The State surcharge rate will become effective the first day of t he month for which the State imposes the surcharge, and will change from time to time thereafter when changes to the rate are made by the State.
As of January, 2021, the surcharge is set at $0.0003 per kWh.
This rate is subject to revision from time to time by the California State Board of Equalization. The surcharge does not apply to electric service for federal government and certain other agencies. (E*US) Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-25 Effective April 1, 2026
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Demand The average rate over a given period of time that a customer requires delivery of electric energy from the Utility system. Demand is another term for power.
Electric Current The movement of charged particles (e.g. electrons) in a material (e.g. power lines). Current is measured in units called Amperes or Amps.
Kilowatt (kW) One thousand (1,000) watts. Kilowatt is a nominal or standard measurement/rating of the capacity of electric lines or equipment and demand or power.
Kilowatt-hour (kWh) Kilowatt-hour is the standard measurement of electric energy. One kilowatt-hour is the amount of energy it takes to run a 100-watt light bulb for 10 hours. (100 watts X 10 hours = 1,000 watt-hours = 1 kilowatt-hour.)
Load Any device that can convert the energy from electric current into some other useful form of energy, such as light, heat, sound, or mechanical motion. In electrical terms, load also refers to the amount of electric demand or power that the device uses or is rated to use.
Load Factor The ratio of the actual energy consumed and the maximum potential energy available during a specified time period, usually expressed as a percentage. e.g. 10,000 kWh/mo = 10,000 kWh/mo = 69.4% 20 kW Demand x 720 hours/mo 14,400 kWh/mo Load Factor
Fixed Charge The monthly charge established for each customer for access to the electric distribution system. This includes the costs of installing and maintaining the electric lines and transformers necessary to provide electricity to the customer’s location. This charge also includes the costs of installing, maintaining and reading the meter, as well as all other billing and customer service related functions provided by the Utility.
Power The rate at which electric energy is delivered by an electric current. Power is equal to the product of voltage and current (Volts X Amps = Watts).
Voltage The force that moves charged particles (e.g. electrons) in material. It is measured in units called Volts.
Watt (W) The standard measurement of electric power. One hundred watts is the rate of energy transfer equal to 10 amps flowing under the influence of 10 volts .
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Rate Book April 2026 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-1 Effective January 1, 2027
SCHEDULE OF RATES – SECTION A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELECTRIC SERVICES PAGE
General Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................... A-2
Residential Service (E1) ............................................................................................................. A-3
Residential Multi-Family Service (E1M) .................................................................................... A-4
Residential Energy Discount (E1LP) ......................................................................................... A-5
Residential Master Metered Service (E5) ................................................................................... A-7
Small Commercial Service (E2) ................................................................................................. A-8
Large Commercial Service (E7) or (E8) ..................................................................................... A-9
Fixed Usage Service (E9) ......................................................................................................... A-11
Streetlight (Nightlight) Service (E9EL) .................................................................................... A-12
Standby Demand Service ......................................................................................................... A-14
Economic Development Service .............................................................................................. A-15
Economic Attraction Service .................................................................................................... A-16
Renewable Resource Net Metering Service (E*NET) .............................................................. A-17
Zero Net Energy Service (E*ZNE) ........................................................................................... A-19
Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) ................................................................................................ A-20
Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) .................................................................................. A-22
State Regulatory Surcharge (STATE) ...................................................................................... A-24
Glossary .................................................................................................................................... A-25 Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-2 Effective January 1, 2027
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE
AVAILABILITY
The electric services provided herein are available throughout the entire City of Redding (Redding) service area where the Redding Electric Utility (REU) facilities are available, of adequate capacity, and adjacent to the premises.
As specified below, certain services are available only to existing customers and other new customers meeting specific operating and use criteria, as presented within each electric service definition.
TAX CLAUSE
Any necessary adjustments for taxes or government fees, whether currently in effect or potentially imposed in the future, which are based on Redding's gross revenues, the price or revenue from the sale of electric energy or services, and/or the volume of energy generated or purchased for sale, will be included in the charges calculated according to the relevant service rate schedules.
PAYMENT
Bills for all electric services will be rendered monthly. A typical meter reading period will not be less than 25 days or more than 35 days. A typical billing period will not be less than 27 days or more than 33 days.
Redding has the option to read residential service meters every two months , and for the months in between, the bill will be based on an estimated kilowatt-hour (kWh) consumption.
Bills will be deemed delinquent if unpaid 20 days after the date of mailing pursuant to Chapter 14.20 of the City of Redding Municipal Code.
Special payment provisions for specific service schedules will be included in the respective schedule outlines.
EFFECTIVE DATES
Certain rates, fees, and/or schedules contained herein are represented with effective dates, such as January 1, 2027. Any such representation is to be interpreted as the respective rate, fee, and/or schedule and is effective in the first billing cycle within the given month’s revenue period.
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-3 Effective January 1, 2027
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE – (E1)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates , plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2027
Fixed Charge $42.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1637
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric services provided for any single -family dwelling or mobile home separately metered by Redding.
Service for dwellings where home care for six or fewer handicapped persons or elderly is provided and such facilities comply with Sections 5115 - 5116 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code and Sections 1569.84 - 1569.85 of the California Health and Safety Code , shall be served under this rate for Residential Service.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/27 - 01/31/27
Total Energy Use 800 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1637 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $130.96
Fixed Charge $42.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $172.96
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-4 Effective January 1, 2027
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SERVICE – (E1M)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2027
Fixed Charge $40.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1637
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric service provided for any multi-family dwelling separately metered by Redding or master metered multi -family facilities providing single-phase residential electric service to all individual tenants that is not sub-metered. Multi-family is defined as a single building that contains two or more dwelling units.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
Three-phase master metered multi-family facilities that are not sub -metered and provide single -phase residential electric service to all individual tenants shall be served under this rate with a meter charge multiplied by the number of dwelling units.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Multi-Family Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/27 - 01/31/27
Total Energy Use 800 8000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1637 $0.1637 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $130.96 $1,309.60
Number of Dwellings
Behind Meter
1 10
Fixed Charge $40.00 $400.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $170.96 $1,709.60
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-5 Effective January 1, 2027
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT – (E1LP)
AVAILABILITY
The Residential Energy Discount is only available to Redding residents who are customers of REU that meet the qualifications outlined below and can be applied to only one location per qualified applicant.
DISCOUNT
The Residential Energy Discount will be a $22.00 reduction of the applicable monthly Fixed Charge and a 40% reduction of the Energy Charge for the first 450 kWh of energy used in each billing period, as computed using the Residential Fixed and Energy charges in effect at the time of billing.
Residential Energy Discount Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/27 - 01/31/27
Total Energy Use 450 kWh Or 900 kWh
Base Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1637 $73.67 $147.33
Energy Discount kWh (450 kWh max) 450 kWh 450 kWh
Energy Discount Credit 40% ($0.0655) ($29.48) ($29.48) Total Energy Charge $44.20 $117.85
Base Fixed Charge $42.00 /mo. $42.00 /mo.
Fixed Charge Credit ($22.00) /mo. ($22.00) /mo.
Fixed Charge $20.00 /mo. $20.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $64.19 $137.85
APPLICABILITY
This service is available to individually metered single -phase electric residential service provided to any single-family dwelling, apartment, or mobile home upon completion of the qualification process described below.
Any service that is master -metered shall have the option to enter into a separate agreement with the City, which provides that any credit would be fully passed on to the qualifying household(s) within the master - metered service. Such services would include, but not be limited to: mobile home parks, senior housing residences, and non-profit housing of qualified households.
The Residential Energy Discount will become effective at the beginning of the billing period after qualification is met.
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-6 Effective January 1, 2027
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT (continued)
QUALIFICATIONS
As published by the State of California's Housing and Community Development Department, the total gross annual income for all persons in the applicant’s household may not exceed sixty (60) percent of Shasta County median income. The table below presents the most recent data, currently in effect.
Maximum Annual Household Income Levels for 20261
A customer shall be removed from the Residential Energy Discount and not eligible to re -apply for a period of twelve months for any of the following reasons:
1. Any evidence of service tampering or meter tampering.
2. Failure to re-certify qualification at any time requested to do so by the City of Redding.
3. Provision of false information during qualification or recertification.
A customer subject to removal from the Residential Energy Discount program can appeal that removal by requesting a review by the REU Director or his designee.
This Residential Energy Discount shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7 ½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
1 Updated (07/2025) by the State of California-HCUD
Number of Persons in
Household
60% of Median Income
Monthly Annual
1 $3,563 $42,750
2 $4,073 $48,870
3 $4,580 $54,960
4 $5,090 $61,080
5 $5,498 $65,970
6 $5,905 $70,860
7 $6,313 $75,750
8 $6,720 $80,640
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-7 Effective January 1, 2027
RESIDENTIAL MASTER METERED SERVICE – (E5)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2027
Fixed Charge $470.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1637
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to facilities that are served through master meters and provide single -phase, sub- metered, residential electric service to all individual tenants.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single-phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. Primary metering may be used by mutual agreement. However, any available primary service discount shall not apply to such service.
Miscellaneous electrical loads, such as general lighting, laundry room, general maintenance , and other similar usage incidental to the operation of a multifamily residential complex or accommodation , will be considered domestic usage and supplied in accordance with the applicable service rate.
Residential Master Metered Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/27 - 01/31/27
Total Energy Use 25,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1637 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $4,092.50
Fixed Charge $470.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $4,562.50
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-8 Effective January 1, 2027
SMALL COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E2)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2027
Fixed Charge $74.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1804
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that does not exceed 25 kW for 7 months or more out of the previous 12-month period and does not surpass 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all general power and lighting services, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer, subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Small Commercial Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/27 - 01/31/27
Total Energy Use 2,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1804 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $360.80
Fixed Charge $74.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $434.80
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-9 Effective January 1, 2027
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E7) or (E8)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that exceeds 25 kW for 6 months or more out of the previous 12-month period or exceeds 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all facilities providing general power and lighting service, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable or available for electric resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Effective Date
January 1, 2027
Fixed Charge $95.00 per meter, per month
Energy Charges $0.1234 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Demand Charge $21.50 per kW
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-10 Effective January 1, 2027
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE (continued)
PRIMARY/TRANSMISSION SERVICE DISCOUNT – (E*P3)
When delivery is made , and energy is metered at a primary or transmission voltage, the following discount shall be applied to the sum of the demand and energy charges. Service at 2,400 volts is not available to new customers requesting service after September 21, 1993.
Discount
Service at 115,000 volts....................... 10% Service at 12,000 volts......................... 3% Service at 2,400 volts........................... 3%
POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT – (E8)
When the billing demand has exceeded 500 kW for 3 consecutive months and thereafter until it has fallen below 300 kW for 12 consecutive months, bills will be adjusted for the weighted monthly average power factor as follows: That portion of the monthly charge comprising the Demand Charge and the Energy Charge, including the Primary Service Discount, if applicable, will be decreased or increased, respectively, by 0.25 percent for each 1 percent that the average power factor of customer's load in the month was greater or less than 95 percent, such average power factor (to the nearest whole percent) is to be computed from the ratio of lagging kilovolt -ampere-hours to kilowatt -hours consumed in the month. All expenses for the installation and/or modification of the customers' facilities to accommodate VAR -hour metering shall be paid by the customer.
Large Commercial Service Bill Calculation Examples
Billing Period 01/01/27 – 01/31/27
Energy Use (kWh) 25,000 kWh Or 200,000 kWh
Monthly Demand (kW) 100 kW 500 kW
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1234 /kWh $0.1234 /kWh
Total Energy Charges $3,085.00 $24,680.00
Demand Charge ($/kW) $21.50 /kW $21.50 /kW
Total Demand Charges $2,150.00 $10,750.00
Fixed Charge $95.00 /mo. $95.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $5,330.00 $35,525.00
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-11 Effective January 1, 2027
FIXED USAGE SERVICE – (E9)
AVAILABILITY
After April 1, 1985, this rate is only available for existing continuous usage rate services. New, decorative, sign, or other night -lighting services shall have metering equipment installed and be served under the applicable rate.
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rate plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
The monthly energy usage for applicable services shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum nameplate load rating of the device being served by either:
a. 730 hours for continuous usage service; or
b. 333 hours for dusk to dawn service.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to electric service where metering equipment is not installed. Usage must be at a fixed rate or be subject to a flat-rate contract.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
Effective Date
January 1, 2027
Energy Charge $0.2968 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Minimum Monthly Bill $20.75
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-12 Effective January 1, 2027
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE – (E9EL)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following flat rate plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
Cost per lamp if
installed by:
Lamp Size City Customer Effective Date 01/01/2027 01/01/2027
70 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $24.42 $7.27 100 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $34.56 $9.27 150 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $36.30 $11.93 200 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $39.38 $14.32 250 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $42.25 $16.73 400 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $46.87 $23.80
Cost Per City
Lamp Size Installed Lamp Effective Date 01/01/2027
175 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $37.63 250 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $42.25 400 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $46.87 1,000 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $66.40 1,500 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $90.57
Cost Per City
Lamp Size Installed Lamp Effective Date 01/01/2027
20-35 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $26.24 35-50 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $29.89 50-65 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $32.90 65-80 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $34.27 80-95 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $37.36 95-110 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $39.03 110-135 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $41.03 135-170 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $44.85 170-225 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $47.55 225-350 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $53.56 350-500 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $63.00
Mercury vapor lamps described above are no longer available for new installations. For lighting efficiency and energy conservation, all existing mercury vapor lamps will be replaced with comparable high -pressure sodium vapor lamps when servicing is necessary.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all unmetered outdoor lights maintained by REU on streets and highways and for all individual customers who request night lighting on private property where adequate City -owned facilities for light fixture mounting already exist.
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-13 Effective January 1, 2027
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE (continued)
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three -wire, nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU. The lamp, luminaries, control device, bracket, and pole/standard will be maintained by REU. A lamp will be controlled to operate from dusk to dawn each night giving approximately 333 hours of lighting service per month.
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-14 Effective January 1, 2027
STANDBY DEMAND SERVICE
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable, at REU’s option, to all customers on the Large Commercial Service rate schedule who utilize their own generation to meet any portion of their electrical supply needs with an electric generation resource that is: 1) installed on the Customer’s side of the delivery point; 2) and interconnected with load that REU may be required to serve on an as needed basis . The customer’s generation system will be used to offset the customer’s energy and if applicable, demand requirements, supplied by REU to the customer. REU reserves the right to limit the number of Customers allowed to interconnect generation systems and equipment on an individual electric circuit or substation.
CHARGES
The customer will be billed for all energy service purchased from REU under the applicable rate schedule.
In addition, the Standby Demand charge shown below will be included on each of the Customer’s periodic utility bills:
Effective Date: January 1, 2027
$14.74 per kW
This charge will be a monthly charge based on the Standby Demand as determined below.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the Customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
STANDBY DEMAND
The highest monthly recorded d emand reading for a 12 -month period directly preceding the customer’s transition to the Standby Demand Service regardless of the time of day or the day of week of the reading. If monthly demand readings are not available for each of the 12 months preceding the customers’ transition to the Standby Demand Service, REU will estimate the maximum demand based on the customer’s existing kwh usage and/or comparison of similar loads within the REU system. REU will reevaluate this Standby Demand on an annual basis and will increase or decrease the Standby Demand as appropriate.
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-15 Effective January 1, 2027
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICE (EDS)
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to any new customer whose monthly billing demand is expected to exceed 100 kW for 3 months out of a consecutive 12 -month period or to any existing customer whose monthly billing demand is expected to increase by 100 kW for 3 months out of a consecutive 12-month period.
For the purpose of this service, a customer is defined as a business bringing entirely new electric load into the City. A business that changes location within the service territory or a business enterprise under ownership does not qualify as new a business.
This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
Qualified customers will be eligible for any and all service discounts available to commercial service customers including, but not limited to, the Primary/Transmission Service Discount and the Power Factor Adjustment.
EDS DISCOUNT
The monthly bill at the commercial rate, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto will be discounted as follows:
Discount: Year 1 (Billing cycle 1 through 12) = 25%
Year 2 (Billing cycle 13 through 24) = 20%
Year 3 (Billing cycle 25 through 36) = 15%
Year 4 (Billing cycle 37 through 48) = 10%
Year 5 (Billing cycle 49 through 60) = 5%
The Discount will end after 60 billing cycles.
In no event shall the cost of power to the customer fall below REU’s average cost to supply power to that customer.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The customer will be required to sign a 5 -year contract. If a customer covered under this schedule leaves before the expiration of the contract, penalties as established in the Council Policy regarding electric incentives for economic development shall apply.
A customer wishing to avail themselves of this service must apply for service within one year of becoming eligible, or lose that eligibility.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. All meter - recording equipment shall be supplied and maintained by REU. Any expense to modify the customer's facilities to accommodate the meter-recording equipment shall be paid by the customer.
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-16 Effective January 1, 2027
ECONOMIC ATTRACTION SERVICE
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to any customer who is considered a manufacturing or industrial company, and who expects their billing demand in the monthly billing period to be at least 25 kW for 6 months out of a 12- month period or 75 kW in any month out of a 12-month period. In addition, the Economic Attraction Service is not designed for those customers in a retail sales business.
Not applicable to, or available for, resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARGES
A monthly bill will be provided at a rate mutually agreed upon by the company and the REU Director. This rate is negotiated and shall include all costs incurred in serving this customer. The rate shall include all relevant distribution and transmission-related costs, including fixed costs and power supply.
In no event shall the cost of power to the customer fall below the incremental cost of power to REU calculated on a per-kWh basis.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A customer on this schedule will be required to sign a contract. The length of the contract is negotiable. The intention of the Economic Attraction Service is to create a relationship with the customer, and for both parties to honor the terms of the negotiated contract. If, however, a customer covered under this schedule does not honor the terms of the contract, and leaves the REU system for another supplier, the customer may be required to pay a Competitive Transition Charge (CTC).
A customer who wishes to be serviced under this schedule must apply for service within one year of becoming eligible or lose that eligibility.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. All meter - recording equipment shall be supplied and maintained by REU. Any expense to modify the customer's facilities to accommodate the meter-recording equipment shall be paid by the customer.
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-17 Effective January 1, 2027
RENEWABLE RESOURCE NET METERING SERVICE – (E*NET)
APPLICABILITY
Effective January 1, 2020, this rate is no longer available for new generators.
The renewable resource net metering tariff is applicable to residential customers and commercial customers where a part or all of the electrical requirements of the customer can be supplied from a solar , wind, or other eligible customer generator as defined in SB489 and SBX1 2 of not more than 1,000 kilowatts that is owned and operated by the customer. The generator must be connected for parallel operation with the service of REU, it must be located on the customer's premises, and it must be intended to offset part or all of the customer's electrical requirements.
Customers on this tariff will be net metered. Net energy metering measures the difference between the electricity supplied through the electric grid and the electricity generated by an eligible customer -generator and fed back to the grid over a 12-month period.
Customers whose solar and/or wind power production source’s rated capacity or capability exceeds 10 kW, up to 1,000 kW or 1 megawatt, could require development of a co -metering tariff with REU, per statutory requirements, at the sole discretion of REU.
CHARGES
A monthly statement on the applicable residential or commercial service, energy and demand charges will be established for all customers operating under the Net Metering Tariff, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto.
The eligible customer -generator shall be billed each month for the applicable monthly Fixed Charges .
Residential and small commercial customers operating under this service will receive an estimate of net energy charges and/or demand charges due to REU. At the end of the twelve (12) billing cycles following the date of the generator’s final interconnection with the Utility’s system and at the end of each successive twelve (12) billing cycles thereafter, the customer shall receive a bill for any applicable charges for electricity used during the previous 12-month period that are unpaid. The customer -generator shall be compensated for any net surplus energy transmitted during the previ ous 12-month period per Special Conditions #3 below. Large Commercial customers will be provided monthly bills for all applicable services, per State Law.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Generation Interconnection Agreement : An interconnection agreement with the customer is required for service under this schedule. The customer must comply with conditions and terms set forth by REU for the safe and efficient interconnection of equipment with the REU electrical system.
2. Net Energy : Net energy is E S minus E F, where E S is energy supplied by REU and E F is energy generated by the customer and fed back into REU's system at such times as customer generation exceeds customer requirements. If the net energy value resulting from the above computation is positive, an energy charge shall be applied at the rates specified below. If the calculation of net energy yields a negative result, all such net surplus energy shall be considered net surplus energy transmitted and shall be treated as stated in Special Condition No. 3 below. The components of net energy, E S and EF, shall be determined by the use of metering equipment best suited for each facility
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-18 Effective January 1, 2027
RENEWABLE RESOURCE NET-METERING SERVICE (Continued)
or location, as determined by REU. All necessary labor, equipment, materials, and related facilities costs in addition to, or in substitution for, standard City facilities that are required in order to take and sell power through one-meter socket, will be at the customer's expense.
3. Net Surplus Energy Transmitted : Net energy transmitted occurs when the cumulative value of E F exceeds the cumulative value of E S during the entire billing period and is the amount by which the energy generated by the customer and fed back into REU's system exceeds the energy supplied by REU over an entire billing period. In the event the energy generated exceeds the energy consumed during the 12-month period, payment will be made for the net surplus energy delivered to REU’s grid.
This compensation will be based on REU’s current avoided cost for energy ($0.0608 per kWh effective January 1, 2020) and is updated administratively on an annual basis.
4. Payment: Statements of any and all monthly service costs will be provided monthly and bills for service will be rendered annually to customers receiving service under the Residential or Small Commercial tariffs outlined herein, per State Law. However, such customers operating under this rate schedule will be allowed to provide periodic (e.g. monthly or bi -monthly) payments for services rendered, if applicable, to avoid an unbudgeted utility expense. Large Commercial customers will be provided monthly bills for all services received under this service, per State Law.
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-19 Effective January 1, 2027
ZERO NET ENERGY SERVICE – (E*ZNE)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the applicable residential or commercial service and net of a credit applied for any surplus energy transmitted ( $0.0608 per kWh effective January 1, 2020 ). Surplus energy transmitted occurs when on-site generation exceeds on-site consumption and energy is transmitted to the grid (real-time customer energy generation exceeds real-time customer energy consumption). When a customer’s on-site generation meets their on -site consumption, the customer avoids the full utility retail rate. When a customer’s on-site generation does not meet their on -site consumption, the customer is charged at the full retail rate.
APPLICABILITY
The net metering successor tariff is applicable to residential customers and commercial customers where a part or all of the electrical requirements of the customer can be supplied from a solar , wind, or other eligible customer generator as defined in SB489 and SBX1 2 of not more than 1,000 kilowatts that is owned and operated by the customer. The generator must be connected for parallel operation with the service of REU, it must be located on the customer's premises, and it must be intended to offset part or all of the customer's electrical requirements.
Customers whose solar and/or wind power production source’s rated capacity or capability exceeds 10 kW, up to 1,000 kW or 1 megawatt, could require the development of a co-metering tariff with REU, per statutory requirements, at the sole discretion of REU.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
Each service is characterized by the applicable residential or commercial service.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Generation Interconnection Agreement : An interconnection agreement with the customer is required for service under this schedule. The customer must comply with conditions and terms set forth by REU for the safe and efficient interconnection of equipment with the REU electrical system.
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-20 Effective January 1, 2027
POWER COST ADJUSTMENT – (PCA)
PURPOSE
The purpose of this adjustment is to appropriately adjust for increases in REU’s wholesale power costs due to the Revenue Adjustment Clause (RAC) associated with purchases by REU from the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (Western).
APPLICATION OF POWER COST ADJUSTMENT
The monthly Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) dollar amount to be added to each bill shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly PCA Factor. This has not been used since the Interim Rate Surcharge was implemented in 1997.
CALCULATION OF THE POWER COST ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
1. The PCA Factor will be calculated and made effective every June 15 and December 15 to reflect any changes in Western's RAC.
2. If Western's RAC amount, in dollars, is a debit (monies owed to Western by Redding), then:
a. Western's RAC debit will be adjusted by:
(1) Subtracting any amount, in dollars, that is over the PCA Balancing Account's minimum balance of $300,000 as recorded 2 months prior to the effective date of the PCA Factor being calculated; however,
(2) If the 2 months' prior balance of the PCA Balancing Account is below $300,000, then the necessary dollar amount required to restore the account to $300,000 will be added to Western's RAC debit.
b. The adjusted debit dollar amount (as referenced in Section 2.a.) will be divided by the adjusted sum of all retail kilowatt-hour sales for the 6-month period beginning 12 months prior to the effective date of the PCA Factor.
c. The adjusted sum of retail kilowatt-hour sales (as referenced in Section 2.b.) will be determined by multiplying the historical total kilowatt-hour sales by a historical 3-year average annual energy growth factor to reflect REU’s rate of growth in kilowatt-hour sales.
d. The PCA Factor resulting from the calculations in Section 2.b. will be applied as a charge to all retail kilowatt-hour sales on a monthly billing-cycle basis beginning with the effective date of the PCA Factor being calculated.
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-21 Effective January 1, 2027
POWER COST ADJUSTMENT (continued)
e. If the calculation of the PCA Factor results in a debit of less than 0.01 cents per kilowatt-hour, then the PCA Factor will be 0.00 cents per kilowatt-hour. The RAC debits from Western will be paid from the PCA Balancing Account.
3. A PCA Balancing Account shall be maintained as an operating account for the purposes of accommodating the cash-flow fluctuations inherent in the PCA process.
a. Each month when a power bill is rendered from Western, which includes any adjustment for Western's RAC, the account's balance will be calculated as follows:
(1) Subtract Western's monthly RAC charge, in dollars, from the balance which existed at the end of the prior month.
(2) Add the amount, in dollars, recovered from the application of the PCA Factor, which was effective during the prior month. Such amount shall be the product of kilowatt-hours of energy billed during the month and the applicable PCA Factor.
(3) Add the amount, in dollars, of all interest earned on the average balance of the funds in the PCA Balancing Account.
(a) Funds from the monthly collection of the PCA will be invested by the City along with the City's other cash accounts and, therefore, will accrue interest at the average monthly rate paid on the City's variable investment account.
b. Best efforts will be made to maintain a minimum balance in the PCA Balancing Account of $300,000.
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-22 Effective January 1, 2027
FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE – (FES)
APPLICABILITY
This surcharge is applicable to the entire City of Redding service area for all kilowatt-hours billed under all rate schedules.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this surcharge is to appropriately adjust for increases and decreases in the REU’s wholesale power costs due to the Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) imposed by HR429 of the 1993 statutes, which is associated with purchases by the City of Redding from the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (Western).
SURCHARGE
The monthly FES dollar amount to be added to or subtracted from each bill, shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly FES Rate. The FES Rate will become effective the first day of the month for which Western imposes the FES and will change from time to time thereafter, when changes in the FES are imposed by Western.
CALCULATION OF THE SURCHARGE
1. The FES Rate will be determined by multiplying the retail kilowatt-hour purchases of Western energy for the following 6-month period as defined in Section 1.A. by the FES rate charged by Western, then by subtracting from the resultant product the FES Balancing Account as defined in Paragraph 2, the difference will then be divided by the total projected retail kilowatt-hour sales as defined in Section
1.A.
a. Projected kilowatt-hour sales and purchases for FES calculation purposes shall be those amounts projected most recently by REU.
b. If the calculation of the FES Rate results in a surcharge of less than 0.01 cents per kilowatt-hour, then the FES Rate will be 0.00 cents per kilowatt-hour.
2. A FES Balancing Account shall be maintained as an operating account for the purposes of accommodating the cash-flow fluctuations inherent in the FES process.
Each month when a power bill is rendered from Western, which includes any adjustment for Western's FES, the account's balance will be calculated as follows:
a. Subtract Western's monthly FES charge, in dollars, from the balance which existed at the end of the prior month.
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-23 Effective January 1, 2027
FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE (continued)
b. Add the amount, in dollars, recovered from the application of the FES Rate which was effective during the prior month. Such amount shall be the product of kilowatt-hours of energy billed during the month and the applicable FES Rate.
c. Add the amount, in dollars, of all interest earned on the average balance of the funds in the FES Balancing Account.
Funds from the monthly collection of the FES will be invested by the City along with the City's other cash accounts and, therefore, will accrue interest at the average monthly rate paid on the City's variable investment account.
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-24 Effective January 1, 2027
STATE REGULATORY SURCHARGE – (STATE)
PURPOSE
The State Regulatory surcharge or Energy Commission tax was established in 1975 by the State Board of Equalization, pursuant to Sections 40031 et seq., of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, to provide funding for the California Energy Commission.
SURCHARGE
The monthly dollar amount to be added to or subtracted from each bill shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly State surcharge rate. The State surcharge rate will become effective the first day of t he month for which the State imposes the surcharge, and will change from time to time thereafter when changes to the rate are made by the State.
As of January, 2021, the surcharge is set at $0.0003 per kWh.
This rate is subject to revision from time to time by the California State Board of Equalization. The surcharge does not apply to electric service for federal government and certain other agencies. (E*US) Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-25 Effective January 1, 2027
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Demand The average rate over a given period of time that a customer requires delivery of electric energy from the Utility system. Demand is another term for power.
Electric Current The movement of charged particles (e.g. electrons) in a material (e.g. power lines). Current is measured in units called Amperes or Amps.
Kilowatt (kW) One thousand (1,000) watts. Kilowatt is a nominal or standard measurement/rating of the capacity of electric lines or equipment and demand or power.
Kilowatt-hour (kWh) Kilowatt-hour is the standard measurement of electric energy. One kilowatt-hour is the amount of energy it takes to run a 100-watt light bulb for 10 hours. (100 watts X 10 hours = 1,000 watt-hours = 1 kilowatt-hour.)
Load Any device that can convert the energy from electric current into some other useful form of energy, such as light, heat, sound, or mechanical motion. In electrical terms, load also refers to the amount of electric demand or power that the device uses or is rated to use.
Load Factor The ratio of the actual energy consumed and the maximum potential energy available during a specified time period, usually expressed as a percentage. e.g. 10,000 kWh/mo = 10,000 kWh/mo = 69.4% 20 kW Demand x 720 hours/mo 14,400 kWh/mo Load Factor
Fixed Charge The monthly charge established for each customer for access to the electric distribution system. This includes the costs of installing and maintaining the electric lines and transformers necessary to provide electricity to the customer’s location. This charge also includes the costs of installing, maintaining and reading the meter, as well as all other billing and customer service related functions provided by the Utility.
Power The rate at which electric energy is delivered by an electric current. Power is equal to the product of voltage and current (Volts X Amps = Watts).
Voltage The force that moves charged particles (e.g. electrons) in material. It is measured in units called Volts.
Watt (W) The standard measurement of electric power. One hundred watts is the rate of energy transfer equal to 10 amps flowing under the influence of 10 volts .
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Rate Book January 2027 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-1 Effective January 1, 2028
SCHEDULE OF RATES – SECTION A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELECTRIC SERVICES PAGE
General Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................... A-2
Residential Service (E1) ............................................................................................................. A-3
Residential Multi-Family Service (E1M) .................................................................................... A-4
Residential Energy Discount (E1LP) ......................................................................................... A-5
Residential Master Metered Service (E5) ................................................................................... A-7
Small Commercial Service (E2) ................................................................................................. A-8
Large Commercial Service (E7) or (E8) ..................................................................................... A-9
Fixed Usage Service (E9) ......................................................................................................... A-11
Streetlight (Nightlight) Service (E9EL) .................................................................................... A-12
Standby Demand Service ......................................................................................................... A-14
Economic Development Service .............................................................................................. A-15
Economic Attraction Service .................................................................................................... A-16
Renewable Resource Net Metering Service (E*NET) .............................................................. A-17
Zero Net Energy Service (E*ZNE) ........................................................................................... A-19
Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) ................................................................................................ A-20
Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) .................................................................................. A-22
State Regulatory Surcharge (STATE) ...................................................................................... A-24
Glossary .................................................................................................................................... A-25 Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-2 Effective January 1, 2028
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE
AVAILABILITY
The electric services provided herein are available throughout the entire City of Redding (Redding) service area where the Redding Electric Utility (REU) facilities are available, of adequate capacity, and adjacent to the premises.
As specified below, certain services are available only to existing customers and other new customers meeting specific operating and use criteria, as presented within each electric service definition.
TAX CLAUSE
Any necessary adjustments for taxes or government fees, whether currently in effect or potentially imposed in the future, which are based on Redding's gross revenues, the price or revenue from the sale of electric energy or services, and/or the volume of energy generated or purchased for sale, will be included in the charges calculated according to the relevant service rate schedules.
PAYMENT
Bills for all electric services will be rendered monthly. A typical meter reading period will not be less than 25 days or more than 35 days. A typical billing period will not be less than 27 days or more than 33 days.
Redding has the option to read residential service meters every two months , and for the months in between, the bill will be based on an estimated kilowatt-hour (kWh) consumption.
Bills will be deemed delinquent if unpaid 20 days after the date of mailing pursuant to Chapter 14.20 of the City of Redding Municipal Code.
Special payment provisions for specific service schedules will be included in the respective schedule outlines.
EFFECTIVE DATES
Certain rates, fees, and/or schedules contained herein are represented with effective dates, such as January 1, 2028. Any such representation is to be interpreted as the respective rate, fee, and/or schedule and is effective in the first billing cycle within the given month’s revenue period.
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-3 Effective January 1, 2028
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE – (E1)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates , plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2028
Fixed Charge $43.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1723
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric services provided for any single -family dwelling or mobile home separately metered by Redding.
Service for dwellings where home care for six or fewer handicapped persons or elderly is provided and such facilities comply with Sections 5115 - 5116 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code and Sections 1569.84 - 1569.85 of the California Health and Safety Code , shall be served under this rate for Residential Service.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/28 - 01/31/28
Total Energy Use 800 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1723 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $137.84
Fixed Charge $43.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $180.84
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-4 Effective January 1, 2028
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SERVICE – (E1M)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2028
Fixed Charge $41.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1723
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric service provided for any multi-family dwelling separately metered by Redding or master metered multi -family facilities providing single-phase residential electric service to all individual tenants that is not sub-metered. Multi-family is defined as a single building that contains two or more dwelling units.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
Three-phase master metered multi-family facilities that are not sub -metered and provide single -phase residential electric service to all individual tenants shall be served under this rate with a meter charge multiplied by the number of dwelling units.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Multi-Family Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/28 - 01/31/28
Total Energy Use 800 8000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1723 $0.1723 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $137.84 $1,378.40
Number of Dwellings
Behind Meter
1 10
Fixed Charge $41.00 $410.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $178.84 $1,788.40
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-5 Effective January 1, 2028
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT – (E1LP)
AVAILABILITY
The Residential Energy Discount is only available to Redding residents who are customers of REU that meet the qualifications outlined below and can be applied to only one location per qualified applicant.
DISCOUNT
The Residential Energy Discount will be a $23.00 reduction of the applicable monthly Fixed Charge and a
42.5% reduction of the Energy Charge for the first 450 kWh of energy used in each billing period, as computed using the Residential Fixed and Energy charges in effect at the time of billing.
Residential Energy Discount Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/28 - 01/31/28
Total Energy Use 450 kWh Or 900 kWh
Base Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1723 $77.54 $155.07
Energy Discount kWh (450 kWh max) 450 kWh 450 kWh
Energy Discount Credit 42.50% ($0.0732) ($32.94) ($32.94) Total Energy Charge $44.60 $122.13
Base Fixed Charge $43.00 /mo. $43.00 /mo.
Fixed Charge Credit ($23.00) /mo. ($23.00) /mo.
Fixed Charge $20.00 /mo. $20.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $64.60 $142.13
APPLICABILITY
This service is available to individually metered single -phase electric residential service provided to any single-family dwelling, apartment, or mobile home upon completion of the qualification process described below.
Any service that is master -metered shall have the option to enter into a separate agreement with the City, which provides that any credit would be fully passed on to the qualifying household(s) within the master - metered service. Such services would include, but not be limited to: mobile home parks, senior housing residences, and non-profit housing of qualified households.
The Residential Energy Discount will become effective at the beginning of the billing period after qualification is met.
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-6 Effective January 1, 2028
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT (continued)
QUALIFICATIONS
As published by the State of California's Housing and Community Development Department, the total gross annual income for all persons in the applicant’s household may not exceed sixty (60) percent of Shasta County median income. The table below presents the most recent data, currently in effect.
Maximum Annual Household Income Levels for 20261
A customer shall be removed from the Residential Energy Discount and not eligible to re -apply for a period of twelve months for any of the following reasons:
1. Any evidence of service tampering or meter tampering.
2. Failure to re-certify qualification at any time requested to do so by the City of Redding.
3. Provision of false information during qualification or recertification.
A customer subject to removal from the Residential Energy Discount program can appeal that removal by requesting a review by the REU Director or his designee.
This Residential Energy Discount shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7 ½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
1 Updated (07/2025) by the State of California-HCUD
Number of Persons in
Household
60% of Median Income
Monthly Annual
1 $3,563 $42,750
2 $4,073 $48,870
3 $4,580 $54,960
4 $5,090 $61,080
5 $5,498 $65,970
6 $5,905 $70,860
7 $6,313 $75,750
8 $6,720 $80,640
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-7 Effective January 1, 2028
RESIDENTIAL MASTER METERED SERVICE – (E5)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2028
Fixed Charge $480.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1723
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to facilities that are served through master meters and provide single -phase, sub- metered, residential electric service to all individual tenants.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single-phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. Primary metering may be used by mutual agreement. However, any available primary service discount shall not apply to such service.
Miscellaneous electrical loads, such as general lighting, laundry room, general maintenance , and other similar usage incidental to the operation of a multifamily residential complex or accommodation , will be considered domestic usage and supplied in accordance with the applicable service rate.
Residential Master Metered Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/28 - 01/31/28
Total Energy Use 25,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1723 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $4,307.50
Fixed Charge $480.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $4,787.50
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-8 Effective January 1, 2028
SMALL COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E2)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2028
Fixed Charge $77.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1885
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that does not exceed 25 kW for 7 months or more out of the previous 12-month period and does not surpass 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all general power and lighting services, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer, subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Small Commercial Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/28 - 01/31/28
Total Energy Use 2,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1885 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $377.00
Fixed Charge $77.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $454.00
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-9 Effective January 1, 2028
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E7) or (E8)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that exceeds 25 kW for 6 months or more out of the previous 12-month period or exceeds 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all facilities providing general power and lighting service, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable or available for electric resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Effective Date
January 1, 2028
Fixed Charge $95.00 per meter, per month
Energy Charges $0.1308 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Demand Charge $21.75 per kW
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-10 Effective January 1, 2028
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE (continued)
PRIMARY/TRANSMISSION SERVICE DISCOUNT – (E*P3)
When delivery is made , and energy is metered at a primary or transmission voltage, the following discount shall be applied to the sum of the demand and energy charges. Service at 2,400 volts is not available to new customers requesting service after September 21, 1993.
Discount
Service at 115,000 volts....................... 10% Service at 12,000 volts......................... 3% Service at 2,400 volts........................... 3%
POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT – (E8)
When the billing demand has exceeded 500 kW for 3 consecutive months and thereafter until it has fallen below 300 kW for 12 consecutive months, bills will be adjusted for the weighted monthly average power factor as follows: That portion of the monthly charge comprising the Demand Charge and the Energy Charge, including the Primary Service Discount, if applicable, will be decreased or increased, respectively, by 0.25 percent for each 1 percent that the average power factor of customer's load in the month was greater or less than 95 percent, such average power factor (to the nearest whole percent) is to be computed from the ratio of lagging kilovolt -ampere-hours to kilowatt -hours consumed in the month. All expenses for the installation and/or modification of the customers' facilities to accommodate VAR -hour metering shall be paid by the customer.
Large Commercial Service Bill Calculation Examples
Billing Period 01/01/28 – 01/31/28
Energy Use (kWh) 25,000 kWh Or 200,000 kWh
Monthly Demand (kW) 100 kW 500 kW
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1308 /kWh $0.1308 /kWh
Total Energy Charges $3,270.00 $26,160.00
Demand Charge ($/kW) $21.75 /kW $21.75 /kW
Total Demand Charges $2,175.00 $10,875.00
Fixed Charge $95.00 /mo. $95.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $5,540.00 $37,130.00
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-11 Effective January 1, 2028
FIXED USAGE SERVICE – (E9)
AVAILABILITY
After April 1, 1985, this rate is only available for existing continuous usage rate services. New, decorative, sign, or other night -lighting services shall have metering equipment installed and be served under the applicable rate.
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rate plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
The monthly energy usage for applicable services shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum nameplate load rating of the device being served by either:
a. 730 hours for continuous usage service; or
b. 333 hours for dusk to dawn service.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to electric service where metering equipment is not installed. Usage must be at a fixed rate or be subject to a flat-rate contract.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
Effective Date
January 1, 2028
Energy Charge $0.3102 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Minimum Monthly Bill $20.75
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-12 Effective January 1, 2028
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE – (E9EL)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following flat rate plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
Cost per lamp if
installed by:
Lamp Size City Customer Effective Date 01/01/2028 01/01/2028
70 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $25.52 $7.27 100 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $36.12 $9.27 150 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $37.93 $11.93 200 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $41.15 $14.32 250 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $44.15 $16.73 400 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $48.98 $23.80
Cost Per City
Lamp Size Installed Lamp Effective Date 01/01/2028
175 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $39.32 250 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $44.15 400 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $48.98 1,000 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $69.38 1,500 watts mercury vapor ........................................................ $94.65
Cost Per City
Lamp Size Installed Lamp Effective Date 01/01/2028
20-35 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $27.42 35-50 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $31.23 50-65 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $34.38 65-80 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $35.81 80-95 watts light emitting diode .............................................. $39.04 95-110 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $40.79 110-135 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $42.87 135-170 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $46.87 170-225 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $49.69 225-350 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $55.97 350-500 watts light emitting diode ............................................ $65.83
Mercury vapor lamps described above are no longer available for new installations. For lighting efficiency and energy conservation, all existing mercury vapor lamps will be replaced with comparable high -pressure sodium vapor lamps when servicing is necessary.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all unmetered outdoor lights maintained by REU on streets and highways and for all individual customers who request night lighting on private property where adequate City -owned facilities for light fixture mounting already exist.
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-13 Effective January 1, 2028
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE (continued)
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three -wire, nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU. The lamp, luminaries, control device, bracket, and pole/standard will be maintained by REU. A lamp will be controlled to operate from dusk to dawn each night giving approximately 333 hours of lighting service per month.
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-14 Effective January 1, 2028
STANDBY DEMAND SERVICE
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable, at REU’s option, to all customers on the Large Commercial Service rate schedule who utilize their own generation to meet any portion of their electrical supply needs with an electric generation resource that is: 1) installed on the Customer’s side of the delivery point; 2) and interconnected with load that REU may be required to serve on an as needed basis . The customer’s generation system will be used to offset the customer’s energy and if applicable, demand requirements, supplied by REU to the customer. REU reserves the right to limit the number of Customers allowed to interconnect generation systems and equipment on an individual electric circuit or substation.
CHARGES
The customer will be billed for all energy service purchased from REU under the applicable rate schedule.
In addition, the Standby Demand charge shown below will be included on each of the Customer’s periodic utility bills:
Effective Date: January 1, 2028
$14.74 per kW
This charge will be a monthly charge based on the Standby Demand as determined below.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the Customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
STANDBY DEMAND
The highest monthly recorded d emand reading for a 12 -month period directly preceding the customer’s transition to the Standby Demand Service regardless of the time of day or the day of week of the reading. If monthly demand readings are not available for each of the 12 months preceding the customers’ transition to the Standby Demand Service, REU will estimate the maximum demand based on the customer’s existing kwh usage and/or comparison of similar loads within the REU system. REU will reevaluate this Standby Demand on an annual basis and will increase or decrease the Standby Demand as appropriate.
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-15 Effective January 1, 2028
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICE (EDS)
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to any new customer whose monthly billing demand is expected to exceed 100 kW for 3 months out of a consecutive 12 -month period or to any existing customer whose monthly billing demand is expected to increase by 100 kW for 3 months out of a consecutive 12-month period.
For the purpose of this service, a customer is defined as a business bringing entirely new electric load into the City. A business that changes location within the service territory or a business enterprise under ownership does not qualify as new a business.
This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
Qualified customers will be eligible for any and all service discounts available to commercial service customers including, but not limited to, the Primary/Transmission Service Discount and the Power Factor Adjustment.
EDS DISCOUNT
The monthly bill at the commercial rate, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto will be discounted as follows:
Discount: Year 1 (Billing cycle 1 through 12) = 25%
Year 2 (Billing cycle 13 through 24) = 20%
Year 3 (Billing cycle 25 through 36) = 15%
Year 4 (Billing cycle 37 through 48) = 10%
Year 5 (Billing cycle 49 through 60) = 5%
The Discount will end after 60 billing cycles.
In no event shall the cost of power to the customer fall below REU’s average cost to supply power to that customer.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The customer will be required to sign a 5 -year contract. If a customer covered under this schedule leaves before the expiration of the contract, penalties as established in the Council Policy regarding electric incentives for economic development shall apply.
A customer wishing to avail themselves of this service must apply for service within one year of becoming eligible, or lose that eligibility.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. All meter - recording equipment shall be supplied and maintained by REU. Any expense to modify the customer's facilities to accommodate the meter-recording equipment shall be paid by the customer.
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-16 Effective January 1, 2028
ECONOMIC ATTRACTION SERVICE
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to any customer who is considered a manufacturing or industrial company, and who expects their billing demand in the monthly billing period to be at least 25 kW for 6 months out of a 12- month period or 75 kW in any month out of a 12-month period. In addition, the Economic Attraction Service is not designed for those customers in a retail sales business.
Not applicable to, or available for, resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARGES
A monthly bill will be provided at a rate mutually agreed upon by the company and the REU Director. This rate is negotiated and shall include all costs incurred in serving this customer. The rate shall include all relevant distribution and transmission-related costs, including fixed costs and power supply.
In no event shall the cost of power to the customer fall below the incremental cost of power to REU calculated on a per-kWh basis.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A customer on this schedule will be required to sign a contract. The length of the contract is negotiable. The intention of the Economic Attraction Service is to create a relationship with the customer, and for both parties to honor the terms of the negotiated contract. If, however, a customer covered under this schedule does not honor the terms of the contract, and leaves the REU system for another supplier, the customer may be required to pay a Competitive Transition Charge (CTC).
A customer who wishes to be serviced under this schedule must apply for service within one year of becoming eligible or lose that eligibility.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. All meter - recording equipment shall be supplied and maintained by REU. Any expense to modify the customer's facilities to accommodate the meter-recording equipment shall be paid by the customer.
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-17 Effective January 1, 2028
RENEWABLE RESOURCE NET METERING SERVICE – (E*NET)
APPLICABILITY
Effective January 1, 2020, this rate is no longer available for new generators.
The renewable resource net metering tariff is applicable to residential customers and commercial customers where a part or all of the electrical requirements of the customer can be supplied from a solar , wind, or other eligible customer generator as defined in SB489 and SBX1 2 of not more than 1,000 kilowatts that is owned and operated by the customer. The generator must be connected for parallel operation with the service of REU, it must be located on the customer's premises, and it must be intended to offset part or all of the customer's electrical requirements.
Customers on this tariff will be net metered. Net energy metering measures the difference between the electricity supplied through the electric grid and the electricity generated by an eligible customer -generator and fed back to the grid over a 12-month period.
Customers whose solar and/or wind power production source’s rated capacity or capability exceeds 10 kW, up to 1,000 kW or 1 megawatt, could require development of a co -metering tariff with REU, per statutory requirements, at the sole discretion of REU.
CHARGES
A monthly statement on the applicable residential or commercial service, energy and demand charges will be established for all customers operating under the Net Metering Tariff, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto.
The eligible customer -generator shall be billed each month for the applicable monthly Fixed Charges .
Residential and small commercial customers operating under this service will receive an estimate of net energy charges and/or demand charges due to REU. At the end of the twelve (12) billing cycles following the date of the generator’s final interconnection with the Utility’s system and at the end of each successive twelve (12) billing cycles thereafter, the customer shall receive a bill for any applicable charges for electricity used during the previous 12-month period that are unpaid. The customer -generator shall be compensated for any net surplus energy transmitted during the previ ous 12-month period per Special Conditions #3 below. Large Commercial customers will be provided monthly bills for all applicable services, per State Law.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Generation Interconnection Agreement : An interconnection agreement with the customer is required for service under this schedule. The customer must comply with conditions and terms set forth by REU for the safe and efficient interconnection of equipment with the REU electrical system.
2. Net Energy : Net energy is E S minus E F, where E S is energy supplied by REU and E F is energy generated by the customer and fed back into REU's system at such times as customer generation exceeds customer requirements. If the net energy value resulting from the above computation is positive, an energy charge shall be applied at the rates specified below. If the calculation of net energy yields a negative result, all such net surplus energy shall be considered net surplus energy transmitted and shall be treated as stated in Special Condition No. 3 below. The components of net energy, E S and EF, shall be determined by the use of metering equipment best suited for each facility
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-18 Effective January 1, 2028
RENEWABLE RESOURCE NET-METERING SERVICE (Continued)
or location, as determined by REU. All necessary labor, equipment, materials, and related facilities costs in addition to, or in substitution for, standard City facilities that are required in order to take and sell power through one-meter socket, will be at the customer's expense.
3. Net Surplus Energy Transmitted : Net energy transmitted occurs when the cumulative value of E F exceeds the cumulative value of E S during the entire billing period and is the amount by which the energy generated by the customer and fed back into REU's system exceeds the energy supplied by REU over an entire billing period. In the event the energy generated exceeds the energy consumed during the 12-month period, payment will be made for the net surplus energy delivered to REU’s grid.
This compensation will be based on REU’s current avoided cost for energy ($0.0608 per kWh effective January 1, 2020) and is updated administratively on an annual basis.
4. Payment: Statements of any and all monthly service costs will be provided monthly and bills for service will be rendered annually to customers receiving service under the Residential or Small Commercial tariffs outlined herein, per State Law. However, such customers operating under this rate schedule will be allowed to provide periodic (e.g. monthly or bi -monthly) payments for services rendered, if applicable, to avoid an unbudgeted utility expense. Large Commercial customers will be provided monthly bills for all services received under this service, per State Law.
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-19 Effective January 1, 2028
ZERO NET ENERGY SERVICE – (E*ZNE)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the applicable residential or commercial service and net of a credit applied for any surplus energy transmitted ( $0.0608 per kWh effective January 1, 2020 ). Surplus energy transmitted occurs when on-site generation exceeds on-site consumption and energy is transmitted to the grid (real-time customer energy generation exceeds real-time customer energy consumption). When a customer’s on-site generation meets their on -site consumption, the customer avoids the full utility retail rate. When a customer’s on-site generation does not meet their on -site consumption, the customer is charged at the full retail rate.
APPLICABILITY
The net metering successor tariff is applicable to residential customers and commercial customers where a part or all of the electrical requirements of the customer can be supplied from a solar , wind, or other eligible customer generator as defined in SB489 and SBX1 2 of not more than 1,000 kilowatts that is owned and operated by the customer. The generator must be connected for parallel operation with the service of REU, it must be located on the customer's premises, and it must be intended to offset part or all of the customer's electrical requirements.
Customers whose solar and/or wind power production source’s rated capacity or capability exceeds 10 kW, up to 1,000 kW or 1 megawatt, could require the development of a co-metering tariff with REU, per statutory requirements, at the sole discretion of REU.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
Each service is characterized by the applicable residential or commercial service.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Generation Interconnection Agreement : An interconnection agreement with the customer is required for service under this schedule. The customer must comply with conditions and terms set forth by REU for the safe and efficient interconnection of equipment with the REU electrical system.
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-20 Effective January 1, 2028
POWER COST ADJUSTMENT – (PCA)
PURPOSE
The purpose of this adjustment is to appropriately adjust for increases in REU’s wholesale power costs due to the Revenue Adjustment Clause (RAC) associated with purchases by REU from the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (Western).
APPLICATION OF POWER COST ADJUSTMENT
The monthly Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) dollar amount to be added to each bill shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly PCA Factor. This has not been used since the Interim Rate Surcharge was implemented in 1997.
CALCULATION OF THE POWER COST ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
1. The PCA Factor will be calculated and made effective every June 15 and December 15 to reflect any changes in Western's RAC.
2. If Western's RAC amount, in dollars, is a debit (monies owed to Western by Redding), then:
a. Western's RAC debit will be adjusted by:
(1) Subtracting any amount, in dollars, that is over the PCA Balancing Account's minimum balance of $300,000 as recorded 2 months prior to the effective date of the PCA Factor being calculated; however,
(2) If the 2 months' prior balance of the PCA Balancing Account is below $300,000, then the necessary dollar amount required to restore the account to $300,000 will be added to Western's RAC debit.
b. The adjusted debit dollar amount (as referenced in Section 2.a.) will be divided by the adjusted sum of all retail kilowatt-hour sales for the 6-month period beginning 12 months prior to the effective date of the PCA Factor.
c. The adjusted sum of retail kilowatt-hour sales (as referenced in Section 2.b.) will be determined by multiplying the historical total kilowatt-hour sales by a historical 3-year average annual energy growth factor to reflect REU’s rate of growth in kilowatt-hour sales.
d. The PCA Factor resulting from the calculations in Section 2.b. will be applied as a charge to all retail kilowatt-hour sales on a monthly billing-cycle basis beginning with the effective date of the PCA Factor being calculated.
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-21 Effective January 1, 2028
POWER COST ADJUSTMENT (continued)
e. If the calculation of the PCA Factor results in a debit of less than 0.01 cents per kilowatt-hour, then the PCA Factor will be 0.00 cents per kilowatt-hour. The RAC debits from Western will be paid from the PCA Balancing Account.
3. A PCA Balancing Account shall be maintained as an operating account for the purposes of accommodating the cash-flow fluctuations inherent in the PCA process.
a. Each month when a power bill is rendered from Western, which includes any adjustment for Western's RAC, the account's balance will be calculated as follows:
(1) Subtract Western's monthly RAC charge, in dollars, from the balance which existed at the end of the prior month.
(2) Add the amount, in dollars, recovered from the application of the PCA Factor, which was effective during the prior month. Such amount shall be the product of kilowatt-hours of energy billed during the month and the applicable PCA Factor.
(3) Add the amount, in dollars, of all interest earned on the average balance of the funds in the PCA Balancing Account.
(a) Funds from the monthly collection of the PCA will be invested by the City along with the City's other cash accounts and, therefore, will accrue interest at the average monthly rate paid on the City's variable investment account.
b. Best efforts will be made to maintain a minimum balance in the PCA Balancing Account of $300,000.
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-22 Effective January 1, 2028
FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE – (FES)
APPLICABILITY
This surcharge is applicable to the entire City of Redding service area for all kilowatt-hours billed under all rate schedules.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this surcharge is to appropriately adjust for increases and decreases in the REU’s wholesale power costs due to the Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) imposed by HR429 of the 1993 statutes, which is associated with purchases by the City of Redding from the Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration (Western).
SURCHARGE
The monthly FES dollar amount to be added to or subtracted from each bill, shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly FES Rate. The FES Rate will become effective the first day of the month for which Western imposes the FES and will change from time to time thereafter, when changes in the FES are imposed by Western.
CALCULATION OF THE SURCHARGE
1. The FES Rate will be determined by multiplying the retail kilowatt-hour purchases of Western energy for the following 6-month period as defined in Section 1.A. by the FES rate charged by Western, then by subtracting from the resultant product the FES Balancing Account as defined in Paragraph 2, the difference will then be divided by the total projected retail kilowatt-hour sales as defined in Section
1.A.
a. Projected kilowatt-hour sales and purchases for FES calculation purposes shall be those amounts projected most recently by REU.
b. If the calculation of the FES Rate results in a surcharge of less than 0.01 cents per kilowatt-hour, then the FES Rate will be 0.00 cents per kilowatt-hour.
2. A FES Balancing Account shall be maintained as an operating account for the purposes of accommodating the cash-flow fluctuations inherent in the FES process.
Each month when a power bill is rendered from Western, which includes any adjustment for Western's FES, the account's balance will be calculated as follows:
a. Subtract Western's monthly FES charge, in dollars, from the balance which existed at the end of the prior month.
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-23 Effective January 1, 2028
FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE (continued)
b. Add the amount, in dollars, recovered from the application of the FES Rate which was effective during the prior month. Such amount shall be the product of kilowatt-hours of energy billed during the month and the applicable FES Rate.
c. Add the amount, in dollars, of all interest earned on the average balance of the funds in the FES Balancing Account.
Funds from the monthly collection of the FES will be invested by the City along with the City's other cash accounts and, therefore, will accrue interest at the average monthly rate paid on the City's variable investment account.
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-24 Effective January 1, 2028
STATE REGULATORY SURCHARGE – (STATE)
PURPOSE
The State Regulatory surcharge or Energy Commission tax was established in 1975 by the State Board of Equalization, pursuant to Sections 40031 et seq., of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, to provide funding for the California Energy Commission.
SURCHARGE
The monthly dollar amount to be added to or subtracted from each bill shall be obtained by multiplying the number of kilowatt-hours for which the bill is rendered by the applicable monthly State surcharge rate. The State surcharge rate will become effective the first day of t he month for which the State imposes the surcharge, and will change from time to time thereafter when changes to the rate are made by the State.
As of January, 2021, the surcharge is set at $0.0003 per kWh.
This rate is subject to revision from time to time by the California State Board of Equalization. The surcharge does not apply to electric service for federal government and certain other agencies. (E*US) Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-25 Effective January 1, 2028
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Demand The average rate over a given period of time that a customer requires delivery of electric energy from the Utility system. Demand is another term for power.
Electric Current The movement of charged particles (e.g. electrons) in a material (e.g. power lines). Current is measured in units called Amperes or Amps.
Kilowatt (kW) One thousand (1,000) watts. Kilowatt is a nominal or standard measurement/rating of the capacity of electric lines or equipment and demand or power.
Kilowatt-hour (kWh) Kilowatt-hour is the standard measurement of electric energy. One kilowatt-hour is the amount of energy it takes to run a 100-watt light bulb for 10 hours. (100 watts X 10 hours = 1,000 watt-hours = 1 kilowatt-hour.)
Load Any device that can convert the energy from electric current into some other useful form of energy, such as light, heat, sound, or mechanical motion. In electrical terms, load also refers to the amount of electric demand or power that the device uses or is rated to use.
Load Factor The ratio of the actual energy consumed and the maximum potential energy available during a specified time period, usually expressed as a percentage. e.g. 10,000 kWh/mo = 10,000 kWh/mo = 69.4% 20 kW Demand x 720 hours/mo 14,400 kWh/mo Load Factor
Fixed Charge The monthly charge established for each customer for access to the electric distribution system. This includes the costs of installing and maintaining the electric lines and transformers necessary to provide electricity to the customer’s location. This charge also includes the costs of installing, maintaining and reading the meter, as well as all other billing and customer service related functions provided by the Utility.
Power The rate at which electric energy is delivered by an electric current. Power is equal to the product of voltage and current (Volts X Amps = Watts).
Voltage The force that moves charged particles (e.g. electrons) in material. It is measured in units called Volts.
Watt (W) The standard measurement of electric power. One hundred watts is the rate of energy transfer equal to 10 amps flowing under the influence of 10 volts .
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Rate Book January 2028 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-1 Effective January 1, 2029
SCHEDULE OF RATES – SECTION A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELECTRIC SERVICES PAGE
General Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................... A-2
Residential Service (E1) ............................................................................................................. A-3
Residential Multi-Family Service (E1M) .................................................................................... A-4
Residential Energy Discount (E1LP) ......................................................................................... A-5
Residential Master Metered Service (E5) ................................................................................... A-7
Small Commercial Service (E2) ................................................................................................. A-8
Large Commercial Service (E7) or (E8) ..................................................................................... A-9
Fixed Usage Service (E9) ......................................................................................................... A-11
Streetlight (Nightlight) Service (E9EL) .................................................................................... A-12
Standby Demand Service ......................................................................................................... A-14
Economic Development Service .............................................................................................. A-15
Economic Attraction Service .................................................................................................... A-16
Renewable Resource Net Metering Service (E*NET) .............................................................. A-17
Zero Net Energy Service (E*ZNE) ........................................................................................... A-19
Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) ................................................................................................ A-20
Federal Environmental Surcharge (FES) .................................................................................. A-22
State Regulatory Surcharge (STATE) ...................................................................................... A-24
Glossary .................................................................................................................................... A-25 Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-2 Effective January 1, 2029
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE
AVAILABILITY
The electric services provided herein are available throughout the entire City of Redding (Redding) service area where the Redding Electric Utility (REU) facilities are available, of adequate capacity, and adjacent to the premises.
As specified below, certain services are available only to existing customers and other new customers meeting specific operating and use criteria, as presented within each electric service definition.
TAX CLAUSE
Any necessary adjustments for taxes or government fees, whether currently in effect or potentially imposed in the future, which are based on Redding's gross revenues, the price or revenue from the sale of electric energy or services, and/or the volume of energy generated or purchased for sale, will be included in the charges calculated according to the relevant service rate schedules.
PAYMENT
Bills for all electric services will be rendered monthly. A typical meter reading period will not be less than 25 days or more than 35 days. A typical billing period will not be less than 27 days or more than 33 days.
Redding has the option to read residential service meters every two months , and for the months in between, the bill will be based on an estimated kilowatt-hour (kWh) consumption.
Bills will be deemed delinquent if unpaid 20 days after the date of mailing pursuant to Chapter 14.20 of the City of Redding Municipal Code.
Special payment provisions for specific service schedules will be included in the respective schedule outlines.
EFFECTIVE DATES
Certain rates, fees, and/or schedules contained herein are represented with effective dates, such as January 1, 2029. Any such representation is to be interpreted as the respective rate, fee, and/or schedule and is effective in the first billing cycle within the given month’s revenue period.
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-3 Effective January 1, 2029
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE – (E1)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates , plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2029
Fixed Charge $44.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1814
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric services provided for any single -family dwelling or mobile home separately metered by Redding.
Service for dwellings where home care for six or fewer handicapped persons or elderly is provided and such facilities comply with Sections 5115 - 5116 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code and Sections 1569.84 - 1569.85 of the California Health and Safety Code , shall be served under this rate for Residential Service.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/29 - 01/31/29
Total Energy Use 800 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1814 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $145.12
Fixed Charge $44.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $189.12
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-4 Effective January 1, 2029
RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SERVICE – (E1M)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2029
Fixed Charge $42.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1814
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to all single -phase residential electric service provided for any multi-family dwelling separately metered by Redding or master metered multi -family facilities providing single-phase residential electric service to all individual tenants that is not sub-metered. Multi-family is defined as a single building that contains two or more dwelling units.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
Three-phase master metered multi-family facilities that are not sub -metered and provide single -phase residential electric service to all individual tenants shall be served under this rate with a meter charge multiplied by the number of dwelling units.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single -phase, 60 hertz, three-wire, and nominal 120/240 volts (or three -wire, 120/208 volts at certain locations as are now or hereafter may be established by REU.)
Residential Multi-Family Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/29 - 01/31/29
Total Energy Use 800 8000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1814 $0.1814 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $145.12 $1,451.20
Number of Dwellings
Behind Meter
1 10
Fixed Charge $42.00 $420.00 /month
TOTAL CHARGES $187.12 $1,871.20
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-5 Effective January 1, 2029
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT – (E1LP)
AVAILABILITY
The Residential Energy Discount is only available to Redding residents who are customers of REU that meet the qualifications outlined below and can be applied to only one location per qualified applicant.
DISCOUNT
The Residential Energy Discount will be a $24.00 reduction of the applicable monthly Fixed Charge and a 45% reduction of the Energy Charge for the first 450 kWh of energy used in each billing period, as computed using the Residential Fixed and Energy charges in effect at the time of billing.
Residential Energy Discount Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/29 - 01/31/29
Total Energy Use 450 kWh Or 900 kWh
Base Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1814 $81.63 $163.26
Energy Discount kWh (450 kWh max) 450 kWh 450 kWh
Energy Discount Credit 45% ($0.0816) ($36.72) ($36.72) Total Energy Charge $44.91 $126.54
Base Fixed Charge $44.00 /mo. $44.00 /mo.
Fixed Charge Credit ($24.00) /mo. ($24.00) /mo.
Fixed Charge $20.00 /mo. $20.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $64.91 $146.54
APPLICABILITY
This service is available to individually metered single -phase electric residential service provided to any single-family dwelling, apartment, or mobile home upon completion of the qualification process described below.
Any service that is master -metered shall have the option to enter into a separate agreement with the City, which provides that any credit would be fully passed on to the qualifying household(s) within the master - metered service. Such services would include, but not be limited to: mobile home parks, senior housing residences, and non-profit housing of qualified households.
The Residential Energy Discount will become effective at the beginning of the billing period after qualification is met.
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-6 Effective January 1, 2029
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DISCOUNT (continued)
QUALIFICATIONS
As published by the State of California's Housing and Community Development Department, the total gross annual income for all persons in the applicant’s household may not exceed sixty (60) percent of Shasta County median income. The table below presents the most recent data, currently in effect.
Maximum Annual Household Income Levels for 20261
A customer shall be removed from the Residential Energy Discount and not eligible to re -apply for a period of twelve months for any of the following reasons:
1. Any evidence of service tampering or meter tampering.
2. Failure to re-certify qualification at any time requested to do so by the City of Redding.
3. Provision of false information during qualification or recertification.
A customer subject to removal from the Residential Energy Discount program can appeal that removal by requesting a review by the REU Director or his designee.
This Residential Energy Discount shall not be applicable to or available for three -phase service, resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7 ½ horsepower, or any equipment which will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
1 Updated (07/2025) by the State of California-HCUD
Number of Persons in
Household
60% of Median Income
Monthly Annual
1 $3,563 $42,750
2 $4,073 $48,870
3 $4,580 $54,960
4 $5,090 $61,080
5 $5,498 $65,970
6 $5,905 $70,860
7 $6,313 $75,750
8 $6,720 $80,640
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-7 Effective January 1, 2029
RESIDENTIAL MASTER METERED SERVICE – (E5)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2029
Fixed Charge $490.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1814
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to facilities that are served through master meters and provide single -phase, sub- metered, residential electric service to all individual tenants.
This Residential Service shall not be applicable to or available for resale for profit, temporary construction service, standby or auxiliary service, service to any single motor exceeding a nameplate rating of 7½ horsepower, or any equipment that will cause excessive voltage fluctuations.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
This service is characterized as single-phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery. Primary metering may be used by mutual agreement. However, any available primary service discount shall not apply to such service.
Miscellaneous electrical loads, such as general lighting, laundry room, general maintenance , and other similar usage incidental to the operation of a multifamily residential complex or accommodation , will be considered domestic usage and supplied in accordance with the applicable service rate.
Residential Master Metered Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/29 - 01/31/29
Total Energy Use 25,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1814 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $4,535.00
Fixed Charge $490.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $5,025.00
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-8 Effective January 1, 2029
SMALL COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E2)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplemented hereto:
Effective Date
January 1, 2029
Fixed Charge $80.00 per meter, per
month
Energy Charge
$0.1970
per kWh for all
kWh in billing
period
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that does not exceed 25 kW for 7 months or more out of the previous 12-month period and does not surpass 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all general power and lighting services, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable to or available for resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer, subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Small Commercial Bill Calculation Example
Billing Period 01/01/29 - 01/31/29
Total Energy Use 2,000 kWh
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1970 /kWh
Total Energy Charge $394.00
Fixed Charge $80.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $474.00
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-9 Effective January 1, 2029
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE – (E7) or (E8)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rates, plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
APPLICABILITY
Commercial services with billing demand in the monthly billing period that exceeds 25 kW for 6 months or more out of the previous 12-month period or exceeds 75 kW in any month out of the previous 12-month period.
This service is applicable to all facilities providing general power and lighting service, including temporary construction service, when all energy is supplied at one point of delivery through one metered service. This service is not applicable or available for electric resale, standby, or auxiliary service.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized by single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
BILLING DEMAND
The billing demand for each billing period shall be the highest average power taken during any 15 -minute interval during that period as indicated or recorded by instruments installed, owned, and maintained by REU.
When the power usage is intermittent or subject to violent fluctuations, REU may base the billing demand upon a 5-minute interval.
Effective Date
January 1, 2029
Fixed Charge $95.00 per meter, per month
Energy Charges $0.1387 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Demand Charge $22.00 per kW
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-10 Effective January 1, 2029
LARGE COMMERCIAL SERVICE (continued)
PRIMARY/TRANSMISSION SERVICE DISCOUNT – (E*P3)
When delivery is made , and energy is metered at a primary or transmission voltage, the following discount shall be applied to the sum of the demand and energy charges. Service at 2,400 volts is not available to new customers requesting service after September 21, 1993.
Discount
Service at 115,000 volts....................... 10% Service at 12,000 volts......................... 3% Service at 2,400 volts........................... 3%
POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT – (E8)
When the billing demand has exceeded 500 kW for 3 consecutive months and thereafter until it has fallen below 300 kW for 12 consecutive months, bills will be adjusted for the weighted monthly average power factor as follows: That portion of the monthly charge comprising the Demand Charge and the Energy Charge, including the Primary Service Discount, if applicable, will be decreased or increased, respectively, by 0.25 percent for each 1 percent that the average power factor of customer's load in the month was greater or less than 95 percent, such average power factor (to the nearest whole percent) is to be computed from the ratio of lagging kilovolt -ampere-hours to kilowatt -hours consumed in the month. All expenses for the installation and/or modification of the customers' facilities to accommodate VAR -hour metering shall be paid by the customer.
Large Commercial Service Bill Calculation Examples
Billing Period 01/01/29 – 01/31/29
Energy Use (kWh) 25,000 kWh Or 200,000 kWh
Monthly Demand (kW) 100 kW 500 kW
Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.1387 /kWh $0.1387 /kWh
Total Energy Charges $3,467.50 $27,740.00
Demand Charge ($/kW) $22.00 /kW $22.00 /kW
Total Demand Charges $2,200.00 $11,000.00
Fixed Charge $95.00 /mo. $95.00 /mo.
TOTAL CHARGES $5,762.50 $38,835.00
Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-11 Effective January 1, 2029
FIXED USAGE SERVICE – (E9)
AVAILABILITY
After April 1, 1985, this rate is only available for existing continuous usage rate services. New, decorative, sign, or other night -lighting services shall have metering equipment installed and be served under the applicable rate.
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following rate plus or minus any adjustments incorporated in this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
The monthly energy usage for applicable services shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum nameplate load rating of the device being served by either:
a. 730 hours for continuous usage service; or
b. 333 hours for dusk to dawn service.
APPLICABILITY
This service is applicable to electric service where metering equipment is not installed. Usage must be at a fixed rate or be subject to a flat-rate contract.
CHARACTER OF SERVICE
The service is characterized as single -phase or three-phase, 60 hertz, and at one standard nominal voltage as mutually agreed by REU and the customer and subject to availability at the point of delivery.
Effective Date
January 1, 2029
Energy Charge $0.3241 per kWh for all kWh in
billing period
Minimum Monthly Bill $20.75
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Rate Book January 2029 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Electric Utility Rate Increases and Adjustments)
Electric Service A-12 Effective January 1, 2029
STREETLIGHT (NIGHTLIGHT) SERVICE – (E9EL)
CHARGES
This service will be billed monthly at the following flat rate plus or minus any adjustments to this rate schedule or supplement hereto:
Cost per lamp if
installed by:
Lamp Size City Customer Effective Date 01/01/2029 01/01/2029
70 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $26.66 $7.27 100 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $37.74 $9.27 150 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $39.64 $11.93 200 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $43.00 $14.32 250 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $46.14 $16.73 400 watts high-pressure sodium .......... $51.18 $23.80