Agenda Packet — Redding City Council, May 19, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding Tarmac Road Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Accept update regarding the Project; and
(2) Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a fourfifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact
The Tarmac Road Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project (Project) is being funded by a Wastewater loan to the Storm Drain Utility. The current total project cost is estimated to be $4,150,000.

The City of Redding (City) received notification from the State on March 10, 2026, that the Governor declared emergency for the 2025 Late December Storm (CDAA 2026-02) is eligible for California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) funding, making this Project eligible for funding.

If the CDAA funding is approved, then 75 percent of the project cost may be reimbursed to the City by the State. The remaining City cost share of 25 percent would still be loaned to the Storm Drain utility by Wastewater.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project update and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: May 19, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Update for the City of Redding Tarmac Road Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project.

Michael Webb, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 234
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project Page 2 Background/Analysis
On April 7, 2026, Council adopted an emergency resolution for the project and authorized the negotiation of emergency contracts. The project proposes to replace the failed existing 20-foot by 6-foot natural bottom arch culvert with a 10-foot by 7-foot cast-in-place reinforced concrete box culvert. The work includes reconstruction of the Tarmac Rd embankment, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt concrete and other miscellaneous items of work.

Staff is coordinating and planning with J.F. Shea Construction Inc. for the construction of the Project. Current Project activities include contract change order, revised insurance and bonds, potholing existing underground utilities, preparation of exhibits required to obtain permits from regulatory agencies, planning for traffic control, beginning operations for staged temporary access and earthwork. The public has been notified of the impending construction activities.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On April 7, 2026, Council determined that the project is statutorily exempt from environmental review und the CEQA Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b)- Emergency Projects.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding Tarmac Road Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths affirmative vote, to declare an emergency and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to negotiate an emergency public works contract for the project in an amount not-to-exceed $3,500,000; (2) Authorize construction contingency amount up to a total of $300,000; (3) Approve $50,000 to cover costs for project development; (4) Approve $300,000 to cover costs for construction management and inspection fees; (5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 33rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $4,150,000 for said purpose; and (6) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact
There have been approximately $55,000 in initial expenses for the project to date for emergency protective measures and engineering. However, due to further inspection, engineering and revised costs estimates the Storm Drain utility does not have sufficient funds to budget for this Project. Therefore, the attached budget resolution is for the Wastewater Utility to provide a loan that will be paid annually, every June 30th and will be amortized annually over a 20-year term at the average pooled cash rate calculated at the time of payment.

MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(g)--Consider adopting Resolution declaring an emergency for the City of Redding Tarmac Road Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project, and associated budget Resolution.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Report to Redding City Council April 2, 2026
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project Page 2
The City received notification from the State on March 10, 2026, that the Governor declared emergency for the 2025 Late December Storm (CDAA 2026-02) is eligible for California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) funding, making this Project eligible for funding. If the CDAA funding is approved, then 75 percent of the project cost may be reimbursed to the City of Redding (City) by the State. The remaining City cost share of 25 percent would still be loaned to the Storm Drain utility by Wastewater according to the terms above.

The following table provides a summary of the estimated costs for the project:

Cost Summary1
Item Incurred Costs to
Date2
Estimate of
Emergency Repairs
Total Current
Estimate
Project Development
Costs
$30 $20 $50
Construction Contract $253$3,475 $3,500
4 Contingency $300 $300
Construction Management $300 $300
Total Project Costs $55 $4,095 $4,150
Notes:
1All amounts are in $1,000’s
2Amounts include City staff time and emergency stabilization efforts/activities completed under contract 3Amount paid to contractor for emergency stabilization efforts/activities under the current contract ($200K not-to-exceed amount)
4Updated contract amount to include adequate resources to complete the required emergency repairs Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the emergency resolution and direct staff to proceed with repairs through the regular Public Contract Code process or provide alternate direction. These processes carry the risk of being too untimely if the City is to immediately protect the public health and safety by restoration of public services and facilities.

If an alternative action is approved staff requests that the budget resolution be adopted to proceed with the Project.

Background/Analysis
On December 21, 2025, a meteorological event known as a convergence line appeared over the City and outlying areas which released an enormous quantity of water consistent with what is calculated to be a once in every 50-year storm. On December 22, 2025, Interim City Manager Kari Kibler, in her role as the Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed that a local emergency existed throughout the City of Redding. Consistent with State law, Redding Municipal Code and City policies, Council held a special meeting on December 26, 2025, to confirm and ratify the Director of Emergency Services’ Proclamation.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Report to Redding City Council April 2, 2026
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project Page 3
On or about December 21, 2025, City crews observed significant failure of a 20-foot by 6-foot natural bottom arch culvert and roadway embankment along Tarmac Road potentially jeopardizing the entire embankment and access for Autumn Glenn Subdivision. Tarmac Road serves approximately 50 residences and is the sole access point other than a narrow emergency access easement on private property. Attached are pictures of the failure and interim protective measures described below.

Staff has contracted with J.F. Shea Construction Inc. for the construction of protective measures and potentially repair. J.F. Shea, a local contractor, was selected based on their technical knowledge, resource availability, and previous performance on emergency projects of similar size and scope. The contract is to provide temporary emergency protective measures including but not limited to slope grading, culvert inlet stabilization, placement of rock slope protection and plastic sheathing to prevent further slope erosion and destabilization of the fill slope supporting Tarmac Road. Construction activities started on December 30, 2025, and the work was completed on December 31, 2025, prior to additional forecasted atmospheric storm events for New Year’s Weekend. Approximately $25,000 have been spent to date. The contractor and the City have continued to monitor the temporary work to assure any additional protective measure are implemented as required. In addition, already having an executed contract with J.F.

Shea will significantly increase their ability to mobilize immediately instead of waiting to secure bonds, insurance and execute contracts.

City engineering staff in cooperation with the Storm Drain utility, contractor, and vendors have been assessing the condition of the arch culvert and roadway. Visual inspections have revealed significant scour erosion of the natural bottom of arch culvert footings throughout and failure of the footing close to the midpoint of the culvert. The embankment slope continues to slough and cracks along the eastbound shoulder and sidewalk are continuing to slowly increase. Staff evaluated a solution to salvage the existing culvert, however due to the extensive scour and damage to the culvert and loss of embankment it was determined that full replacement of the arch culvert with a concrete box culvert was the best solution. Replacement would allow for the roadway embankment to be reconstructed and the box culvert would provide hazard mitigation of future failure due to the concrete bottom of the new culvert. The project will also include concrete headwalls to protect the inlet of the culvert which was a primary cause of failure.

The Resolution seeks authorization to declare an emergency under RMC 4.22.120 and Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050. As such, a fourth-fifths vote of the Council will be required to adopt the resolution. Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 collectively provide authority to repair or replace a public facility, and procure the necessary equipment, services and supplies for those purposes without competitive bidding. While notice and competitive bidding are very beneficial in non-emergency situations, these processes are entirely too untimely if we are to immediately protect the public safety by restoring public facilities. If the replacement is not completed prior to fall, 2026 rain season, then there is a potential for catastrophic failure of the culvert and roadway. Failure of the culvert and roadway would be a public access and safety crisis for the Autumn Glenn Subdivision.

It should be noted that RMC 4.22.120 delegates authority to the City Manager to make a finding that the emergency will not permit the delay resulting from a competitive solicitation of bids and that immediate action is necessary to respond to the emergency. In order to ensure Council oversight, RMC 4.22.120(C)(1) requires review of action under Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 at every regular meeting until such time as the emergency ceases.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Report to Redding City Council April 2, 2026
Re: 9.11(g)--Declare Emergency for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project Page 4
The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15269 – Emergency Project. The CEQA Section 15269 exemption includes emergency repairs to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of a disaster in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor. The 2025 Late December Storms caused significant damage to land, structures, and critical infrastructure in Shasta County, and the California Governor signed a State of Emergency Proclamation for the 2025 Late December Storms on December 24, 2025.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding” Attachments
Location Map
Resolution - Declaring Emergency
Budget Resolution
Tarmac storm damage photos
NOE December 2025 Flooding Repairs
Previous Staff Report - Item no. 2.1 - 12/26/25 Council Meeting - Emergency Proclamation Reso. 2025-095 - Resolution Confirming Existence of a Local Emergency (1) State of California Proclamation of a State of Emergency (12/24/25) Request for CDAA Funding - Shasta County - 2025 Late December Storms - APPROVED

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REDDING TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY AND AUTHORIZE THE

CITY MANAGER TO AWARD EMERGENCY CONTRACTS FOR THE

TARMAC ROAD STORM DRAIN EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT

PROJECT
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050 and Redding Municipal Code 4.22.120(A)provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and
WHEREAS, on or about December 21, 2025, staff was made aware that the 20-foot by 6-foot arch culvert storm water conveyance system under Tarmac Road failed a n d i s causing significant erosion and undermining of the roadway; and WHEREAS, Tarmac Road is critical for the Autumn Glenn Subdivision primary residential access with no other access other than a narrow emergency access on private property; and
WHEREAS, the roadway is vital to the Autumn Glenn Subdivision, public health, safety, and fire protection; and
WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids is anticipated to require at least seven (7) months to design, advertise for bids, and award a contract for construction, after which construction would not occur until the summer 2027 due to the onset of the 2026 rain season; and WHEREAS, failure to complete the arch culvert replacement and roadway embankment repair prior to the 2026 rain season would significantly increase the risk of the total roadway failure and threaten the safety of the Autumn Glenn Subdivision.; and WHEREAS, protective measures of the embankment slope to accommodate the delay necessary for the competitive bidding process would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons or property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the storm water conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the roadway.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

3. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore declares an emergency and authorizes the City Manager to award emergency contracts to replace the storm water conveyance system and repair Tarmac Road.

4. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN L. STOCK, Interim City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement RESOLUTION NO. 2026 - _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 33
rdAMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-049
APPROPRIATING $4,150,000 FOR THE TARMAC ROAD STORM DRAIN EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
241 6791 Tarmac Culvert Repair Storm
Drain
$4,150,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
231-0000-2910000 Fund Balance 1,037,500
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
241-6791-3631701 State Grant Capitol 3,112,500
231-6301-3560001 Advances to Internal (1,037,500)
241-6701-3560002 Advances to Internal 1,037,500
Increase Expenditures
241-6791-6000302 Tarmac Culvert Repair Storm
Drain 4,150,000
Total $ 4,150,000 $ 4,150,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $4,150,000 for the Tarmac Road Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of April, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN L. STOCK, Interim City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement APPROVED Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution to confirm and ratify the Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services declaring a local emergency.

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the resolution could have a positive fiscal impact of an indeterminate amount as it will facilitate the recovery of the community and the receipt of emergency aid from state, and possibly federal, authorities if it becomes available.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to adopt the resolution or provide alternate direction. Failure to adopt the resolution will result in a legal finding that the local emergency has ceased and will likely negatively impact the receipt of aid from state and/or federal authorities, and the City of Redding’s (City) ability to immediately repair or replace damaged infrastructure.

Background/Analysis
On December 21, 2025, a storm event arrived in the City of Redding, ultimately causing conditions beyond the immediate control of local resources, services, personnel, equipment, and facilities. These winter storms have brought heavy rain to all areas of Shasta County resulting in localized flooding, water rescues, and damage to roadways, storm water systems, and other infrastructure. The current forecast calls for continued storms and rainfall which could further exacerbate flooding and increase the difficulty of recovery efforts.

MEETING DATE: December 26, 2025
ITEM NO. 2.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2.1--Consider Resolution to confirm and ratify the City of Redding Proclamation declaring a local emergency due to flooding.

Kari Kibler, Interim City
Manager/Personnel Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Report to Redding City Council December 24, 2025
Re: 2.1--Adopt Resolution to Confirm and Ratify the Proclamation Declaring a Local Emergency Page 2
Due to these events and weather conditions, a local emergency was proclaimed on December 22, 2025, and it is recommended that the Council ratify this proclamation and continue the declaration until such time that the threat of these storms has subsided, there is no longer an elevated risk to life and property, and the emergency restoration of facilities has been completed.

The local emergency was declared by the City Manager serving in her capacity as Director of Emergency Services under Redding Municipal Code (RMC) section 9.12.030. The Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services is attached.

Pursuant to Government Code section 8630, the Proclamation is valid for seven days. As such, if the Council does not act to adopt a resolution which confirms and ratifies the existence of a local emergency, the declaration of local emergency made under the Proclamation will lapse. A declaration of local emergency provides several benefits in time of emergency. Under Government Code section 8634, it permits a local agency to immediately promulgate orders and regulations necessary to protect the public health and safety. It further permits the State and local agencies to provide mutual aid to the City and makes the costs of such aid incurred by other agencies chargeable to the State. Lastly, the declaration of local emergency facilitates payment to the City by the State under the Disaster Assistance Act (Gov. Code section 8680 et seq.).

The resolution contains all the needed findings to continue the declaration of local emergency under the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code section 8550 et seq.). In the absence of action under Public Contract Code, the Council could declare an emergency under the California Emergency Service Act by a simple majority vote.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Resolution - Local Emergency Declaration December 2025 ^Proclamation - Emergency Declaration Flood of December 2025

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement RESOLUTION NO. 2025-_____

RESOLUTION CONFIRMING EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, Government Code section 8642 provides that whenever a state or local emergency exists, the governing body of the local governmental entity shall meet as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, Redding Municipal Code sections 9.12.030, and 14.24.020, generally empower the City Manager, as Director of Emergency Services, to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is not in session; and
WHEREAS, Redding Municipal Code section 9.12.030(C) provides that the decision of the City Manager to declare a local emergency must be ratified by the City Council within seven (7) calendar days of the City Manager’s action or it shall have no further force or effect; and WHEREAS, the City Manager, as Director of Emergency Services of the City of Redding, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency, as defined in Government Code section 8558(c), within the City on the 22nd day of December, 2025, as evidenced by the Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services attached and incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services dated December 22, 2025, was sent to the County Director of Emergency Services on December 22, 2025; and WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City which were caused by flooding caused by severe winter storms which began on December 21, 2025; and WHEREAS, the conditions caused by the flooding are beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment and facilities of the City of Redding; and
WHEREAS, the National Weather Service and other forecasting agencies have advised that additional significant storm systems are expected to impact the region in the coming days, bringing continued heavy rainfall, high winds, and the potential for additional flooding; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impacts of successive storm systems pose an ongoing and imminent threat to the health and safety of residents, emergency responders, and public infrastructure within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the aforesaid conditions of extreme peril did warrant and necessitate the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED as follows:

1. The recitals stated above are true, correct, and are adopted herein.

2. The Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services dated December 22, 2025, is hereby confirmed and ratified.

3. That, pursuant to Government Code section 8630(a), a local emergency within the meaning of Government Code section 8558(c) exists within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Redding.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

4. That, pursuant to Government Code section 8630(c) the City Council shall review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every sixty (60) days until the City Council terminates the local emergency.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a Special meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 26th day of December, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

__________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement APPROVED Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement soL T1oN No, o s- a
sc uT aN cc N N+ x sT rc aF a. ocaL n Ex E vc
WHE AS, Gc vernrnent Code section 8642 pravides that whenever a state c r local emergency exists, the goveming body of the lacal governmental entity shall meet as soc n as passible; nd WHE AS, Redding Municipal Code sectic s 9. 2. 030, and 14. Z4. 02t, generally empower the City Manager, as I irector of Emergency Services, to proclaim the existence c r threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected ar likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is nat in session; and
WHEREAS, Redding Municipal Code sectic n 9. 12. 430( Cj provides that the decision of the City Manaber to declare a local emergency rnust be ratified by the City Counneil within seven( 7) calendar days af the City Manager' s actian or it sh ll have nc further force ar effect; and WHE AS, the City Manager, as Directt r of Emergency Services of the City af Redding, proclaimed the existence ofa l+cal emergency, as defined in Government Code sectio 1855( c), within the City on the 22" a day of I)ecember, 2025, as evidenced by the Proclarriation of the Director of Emergency Services attached and incorporated herein; and
WHE12EA5, the Prociamation Qf the Director of Emergency Services dated December 2, 2 25, was sent ta the Cc unty Director af Emergenc Services on I ecember 22, 2025, and WHE AS, cond tions of extreme peril tc the safety of persons and property haVe aris n within the City which were caused by flooding caused iy severe winter torms which began on December 21, 2025; and E AS, the conditions aused by the floc ding are b yond the contral of the services, persoz nel, equipment a d facilities of the City crf Redding; and
WHE ' AS, the National Weather Service atid other fc recasting agencies ha e advised that additianal significant starm systems are expected to irnpact the region in the coming days, bringing continued heaVy rainfall, high winds, and the pc ter tial for additional floc c ing; and WHE AS, the cumulative impacts of succ ssive storm systems pose an ongoing and imminent thr at to the health and safety of residents; m rgency respt nders, and public infrastructure within the City; and WHE ' AS, the City Councii hereby finds that the aforesaid c nditic ns of extreme peril did warrant and necessitate the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency; N(7W, THE FO , IT IS HE S*1'' PI20+CLAIMED 1 ND O ERED as follows:

1. The recitals stated above are true, cc7rrect, and are adapted herein.

2. The Proclamation of the Directar of Emergency Services dated December 22, 2025, is hereby canfrmed and ratified,
3_ That, pursuant to Government Cade sectit n 8630( a); a local emergency within the meaning of Government Cc de section 855$( c) exists within the jurisclictional limits of the City of Redding.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

4. That, pursuant to Government Code section 863( c) the City Council shall review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every sixty( 60) days until the City Council terminates the local emergency.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the fc regaing resolution was introduced and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City c f Redding on the 26th day of December, 2025, by the fallowing vote:

AYES: CtJUN IL ME E12; - Audette, Dhanuka, Munns, Resner, and L ttau NOES. COUNCIL ME ' ERS. - None
ABSENT: COUI TCIL ME ' ERS. - 1Vone
ABSTATN: CO UNCIL ME ERS. - None
r`' /
H
e' r
1VIIKE LITTAU, Mayar
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TC} FC?RCVI:
r,
LL.W,-^`,
x.' v..; .'.....-.,,,-,--
SHARLENE TIpT City Clerk C STIAN M. CITRTIS, City Attarney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement A PR4 LAMATI aF
THE I) E TUR ()' E RGEIV Y SERVICES f F THE
T'' C1F I2EDDING, C LIFt71 NIA
i HEREAS, Redding Municipal C de { RMC) sections 9. 12. 030, and 9. 12.t 2U, provide far the preparati n and cartying c ut of plans far the protection of persons and property within the City in the event csf an emergency;
ERE iS, RMC section 9. 12. 03Q states that the City Manager is tihe I irectot of Emergency services and the Assistant City Manager is the Assistant I irector of Emergenc Services 6 HEREAS; RMC ectian 9: 12. fl30 empowers the Director or Assistant Dire tor of E nergency Services tc proclaim the existence of threatened existence af a local emergency when the City Council is not in session;
1 HERE S, the Director af Emer ency Serviees of the City af Redding does hereby find that condieians af extrerne peril to the safety of persons and roperty have arisen within the City c f Redding, caused by floociing, which began an the 2i$t
day of Llecesnber 2025;
HERE IS, these c nditians are or are tikely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equrprnent, and facilities of the City of R dding;
Y HERE,4S, the City Cr uncil of the City af Redding is nc t in sessic n and cannot innrnediately be called intc session; and I
NOW, TH REFDRE, IT I,S HEREBY PRG CLAI EU, that a lacal ernergency now exists:
thraughout the ity af Redding; and I
I' IS FURT ER` P:RU L.AIMEL NL UR? ERED that during the existence af' said local emergency, the powers, functions, and duties of the rnergency organization f the City of Redding shal] tht se prescribeci by the stat law, by ordinanc s, and resolutions of the Citiy crf Redding, and that this err ergency proclamatic n shail expire seven{ 7) days after issuance unless confitmed and ratified by the City Cauncil c f the ity of R.edding;
IN TEST`Mt 1YY t IERE F, 1 HEREUNTEI SET Y H 4ND , 41VD CA SE THE S".EAL UF THE CITY CIF R.E ING TG BE AF'FIXE THI,S
ZZn'. L AY C F DECE I'I ER I S.
t,',
ti "';'
i .
t
sc ` a+.t. l a`,
r
s ;'
z" ay' a... r.
p
u."
Y ' R "` UI ClF EMERGENCY SERVICES Y S?
tu'
Y
S
tq a { b `„ y„
y
k 3 2St''' 3 147., E{ 1111 LL1114. ( All liJ 1+ 1
u . t 1 ` { .
3` r 7 . h'
Y '^ T i'!. f;``$i``.;., i ''}.$,,.
u '
t ttk
t} 3,' it} t' tt, i # 1,,Z
tt °t tS
ii , E ri t`'`''°.
4tr ` tk.., d t
s,i t"' S7

1..
41i , Y i', iS,, t` N v(, p,?,. 2q„ ar x{ai SA` ..
a; s} t
m' xi,' t e
1 aa: r a
r.,
1 APPROVED
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement Project)

GAVIN NEWSOM

GOVERNOR

CHRISTINA CURRY

ACTING DIRECTOR
3650 SCHRIEVER AVENUE, MATHER, CA 95655
(916) 845-8506 TELEPHONE
www.CalOES.ca.gov
March 10, 2026
The Honorable Chris Kelstrom
Chair, Shasta County Board of Supervisors
1450 Court Street
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Shasta County – 2025 Late December Storm – Request for California Disaster Assistance Act Funding
Dear Chairperson Kelstrom:

This letter is in response to Shasta County’s request for financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) due to the impacts of the 2025 Late December Storm.

In accordance with the California Emergency Services Act, the Governor declared a State of Emergency to exist in Shasta County on December 24, 2025, for the 2025 Late December Storm. To help the impacted communities recover from the event, CDAA funding is authorized for Shasta County for the 2025 Late December Storm (CDAA 2026-02). My staff will contact your authorized agent on record under separate cover to provide the forms necessary to apply for reimbursement utilizing the CDAA Program.

Please know Cal OES will continue to work closely with your team during the recovery efforts. Feel free to contact [email protected], if you have additional questions or would like to discuss this matter further.

Sincerely,

ROBYN FENNIG
Deputy Director, Recovery
cc: Rob Sandblom, Lieutenant, Shasta County Office of Emergency Services David J. Rickert, County Executive Officer, Shasta County Thomas Graham, Regional Administrator, Inland Region Response, Cal OES Docusign Envelope ID: 06443928-5970-493A-A4D2-5CB79668A6A6

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Item no. 9.11(g), April 7, 2026, (4.11(a)--Update for the Tarmac Rd Storm Drain Emergency Replacement

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution accepting the City of Redding’s List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fiscal Impact
There is no negative impact to the General Fund with the recommended action. The estimated Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funding allocation to the City of Redding (City) is $2,630,375. Adopting a proposed projects list is a condition for receiving the City’s formulaic disbursement.

Senate Bill (SB) 1 contains a local agency Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The intent of the MOE requirement is so that state funding does not fully supplant local spending, thus SB 1 requires that a city maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than the average of fiscal years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12, which for the City is calculated to be $1,573,112 per fiscal year.

RMRA apportionments are deposited into the City's Special Gas Tax Fund upon receipt. The City's Streets Division operates within the General Fund; throughout and at the end of the fiscal year, the City determines the allowable transfer from the Special Gas Tax and Local Transportation/TDA Fund to the General Fund, which is then documented in the annual Streets Report to the State Controller. The report also serves as the basis for SB 1 expenditure reporting, which is due to the California Transportation Commission on December 1 each year. The Road Reimbursement payments from the City's three Public Works utility enterprises ($980,200 from Solid Waste and $290,050 each from Water and Wastewater, totaling $1,560,300) together with other miscellaneous receipts and discretionary funding, such as transferring Streets Rolling Stock funds to the General Fund for equipment purchases, covers the small remaining balance of the MOE threshold.

MEETING DATE: May 19, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting the List of Projects Funded by Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Michael Webb, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 262
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1 Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the attached resolution as written and provide staff with further direction, such as which projects should be included in the proposed project list.

If Council chooses not to adopt a resolution approving a proposed projects list before July 1, then the City would not be eligible to receive its FY 2026-27 RMRA apportionment of $2,630,375.

Under this alternative, the City would also not be obligated to meet the $1,573,112 MOE general fund spending requirement for that fiscal year, potentially preserving those discretionary dollars for other General Fund priorities during a period of fiscal constraint.

Forgoing RMRA funds in one fiscal year does not affect the City’s eligibility in future years; the loss of RMRA funding would be limited in effect to the year in which the resolution is not adopted. Without the $2,630,375 RMRA apportionment and the $1,573,112 General Fund MOE funding, the Streets Division’s projected FY 2026-27 revenue of approximately $12.5 million would be reduced by roughly 33 percent, placing significant strain on the limited Gas Tax reserves. Deferred street maintenance also carries long-term cost consequences and reduced investment accelerates deterioration toward costlier reconstruction.

Background/Analysis
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed SB 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and road systems. SB 1 increases per-gallon fuel excise taxes; increases diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to gas tax rates in future years. RMRA funds are apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties. The City’s portion of RMRA funds for FY 2026-27 is estimated to be $2,630,375. This represents one of seven revenue streams that together fund the City's Streets Division, which is projected to receive approximately $12.5 million in total Streets revenue in FY 2026-27.

Streets Revenue Summary1
FY RMRA2 HUTA3 TDA4 RSTP5 Solid
Waste6,7
Wastewater6,7 Water6,7 Total
2025/26 $2,481 $2,783 $4,045 $1,631 $949 $281 $281 $12,451 2026/27 $2,630 $2,835 $4,045 $1,478 $980 $290 $290 $12,548 Notes:
1 All costs are in $1,000’s
2 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB 1)
3 Highway Users Tax Account
4 Transportation Development Act – Local Transportation Funds (LTF) 5 Regional Surface Transportation Program from Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) – Exchanged Federal Funds for State Cash
6 Amounts derived by proportional impact to the roadways 7 Provides for the City’s MOE requirement towards SB 1 eligibility Packet Pg. 263
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1 Page 3 SB 1 emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency in the delivery of California’s transportation programs. Therefore, in order to be eligible for RMRA funding, cities must submit a project list. The attached project list (Attachment A) may be funded with RMRA funds depending on the availability of other funding sources within the Streets Division. On May 20, 2025, the Council held a Special Meeting to consider, and incorporate input on, the FY 2026- 27 Streets budget development. The RMRA legislation recognizes the need for, and provides agencies with, the flexibility to fund projects in accordance with local needs and priorities. As such, the project list is simply a proposal of potential projects that may utilize these funds.

Agencies are required, however, to submit expenditure reports by December 1 of each year that detail each project and corresponding amount of RMRA funds utilized to ensure program accountability.

The RMRA provides much needed funds to repair and rehabilitate existing transportation facilities at both the state and local level. FY 2026-27 will mark the tenth year in which the City has received SB 1 RMRA funding. Since the program’s inception in FY 2017-18, the City has received approximately $16.9 million in RMRA apportionments through FY 2025-26, with the FY 2026-27 allocation bringing the City’s estimated cumulative total to approximately $19.6 million. SB 1 also includes a local agency MOE requirement that applies to allocated RMRA funds. The City of Redding must maintain at least $1,573,112 per year of discretionary spending for street, road, and highway purposes to continue to be eligible for these apportionments. A city that fails to comply with the MOE requirement in a particular year may make it up with additional expenditures in the following year.

The City's Public Works Utilities (Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste) are municipally owned and operated enterprises that are exempt from local property taxation. In recognition of this exemption, and to equitably allocate the costs associated with accelerated street infrastructure wear caused by the routine operation of heavy utility vehicles, the City has established a Road Reimbursement mechanism. Essentially, garbage trucks, sewer lines, and water mains tear up roads, so these utilities should help pay for some repairs; under this arrangement, the Utilities make an annual payment to the General Fund equal to their estimated proportional share of street network impact and damage. The Road Reimbursement amount is escalated annually using the Construction Cost Index as calculated by Engineering News-Record, and the resulting revenue is budgeted directly to Streets Division activities for street, road, and highway purposes. In the FY 2025-27 Biennial Budget, Council has appropriated all of the FY 2026-27 Road Reimbursement amount to the Streets Division ($1,560,300 total: $290,050 each for Water and Wastewater, $980,200 for Solid Waste).

The City’s backlog of deferred maintenance continues to grow as need outpaces resources. As of April 2026, the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS) reflects a measured citywide average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 50, at the lower boundary of the “Fair” zone and at risk of further deterioration into the “Poor” category, which requires costlier reconstruction rather than more economical preventative maintenance and rehabilitation treatments. PCI is measured from 0 to 100, where 70 or above represents good condition only requiring preventative maintenance. Pavement management modeling indicates that without leveraging gas tax allocations and grant opportunities to sustain Capital investment of approximately $13.5 million per year, the average network PCI is projected to decline to approximately 39 by 2045, well into the Poor zone. RMRA funding represents a critical component of the City’s strategy to reverse this trajectory and preserve existing infrastructure assets in a cost-effective manner. The City uses its PMS to prioritize projects that maximize the benefit of available funding by targeting streets where timely treatment can prevent more expensive reconstruction in the future.

Packet Pg. 264
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1 Page 4 The proposed FY 2026-27 RMRA-funded project list (Attachment A) includes three projects focused on maintaining City streets and assets, a primary goal for SB 1. The FY 26-27 General Street Maintenance project provides for the citywide procurement of Public Works safety equipment, materials, staffing, and servicing of Public Works systems; these are operational needs, total cost estimate of $5.2 million, essential to sustaining day-to-day streets maintenance activities. The Cape Seal 2026 and Replace AC Surfacing 2026 projects represent the City’s primary annual capital pavement maintenance efforts, delivering large-scale, cost-effective treatments that extend pavement life and improve corridor conditions. The Cape Seal 2026 project, total cost estimate of $3.2 million, will perform pavement rehabilitation and safety improvements in the Sunset Drive and Overhill Drive neighborhoods. The Replace AC Surfacing 2026 project, total cost estimate of $2.9 million, will rehabilitate pavement along multiple corridors, including Browning Street from Hilltop Drive to Old Alturas Road and Mistletoe Lane from Hilltop Drive to Churn Creek Road, and includes ADA curb ramp rehabilitation, bike lane improvements, and crosswalk repair.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Acceptance of the project list is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Projects that move to the design phase will be reviewed for CEQA compliance individually, and no further action is required.

Packet Pg. 265
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1 Page 5 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Resolution
Attachment A - Proposed Projects List FY26
Packet Pg. 266
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING THE LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Redding (City) are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must include a list of all projects (Attachment A) proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, in the City budget, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $2,630,375 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a public process to ensure public input into our community’s project list; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop portions of the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets and roads and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and numerous similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide;
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Resolution (4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, accepts the proposed projects which will utilize Fiscal Year 2026- 27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation revenues in their delivery. With the listing of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects (Attachment A) with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues funded by SB 1, the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of May, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
__________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN L. STOCK,
Interim City Attorney
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Resolution (4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1) Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Projects List FY26 (4.11(b)--Resolution Accepting List of Projects Funded by SB1)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Bid Negotiation No. 5606, Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project, awarded to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $2,098,108.44.

Fiscal Impact
Streets Division funding in the amount of $2,300,000.00 was approved for this project for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration, is $2,098,108.44 (approximately 9% under budget).

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not accept the project as satisfactorily complete, and advise staff on how to proceed.

Background
J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. has completed all items of work on the Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project as of January 23, 2026, which was within the contract time frame.

The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date of January 23, 2026, and the Public Works Department subsequently filed a notice of completion with the County.

MEETING DATE: May 19, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project Michael Webb, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 270
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project Page 2 At its meeting of August 4, 2025, the Council awarded a construction contract to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. of Redding, for $1,630,457.00 and approved a $163,100.00 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $239,000.00 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $196,200.00 for project development costs, and the City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000.00, for a total authorized amount of $2,278,757.00.

Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services. During construction, there were six change orders in the amount of $89,171.44, leaving a balance of $73,928.56 in the contingency fund. The final project cost was $2,098,108.44.

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $196,200.00 $186,156.53
Construction Contract +
Contingency $1,793,557.00
Construction Contract +
Contract Change Orders $1,719,628.44
Contract Administration &
Inspection $239,000.00 $192,323.47
Additional City Manager
Authority $50,000.00 $0.00
Total $2,278,757.00 $2,098,108.44
The project involved street surface preparation and construction of approximately 9,100 tons of asphalt concrete, ADA ramp installations, striping, pavement markings, pavement markers, traffic control and other work along various sections of Hartnell Avenue.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no action is required. On August 4, 2025, the Council determined that the Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project was categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
c: Nick Visconti, Construction Manager
Attachments
Location Map
Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 Packet Pg. 271
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Location Map (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5606 (Project No.

STADM23026), Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2025:
(1) Award to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,630,457; (2) Approve $239,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) Approve $196,200 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $163,100 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; (6) Approve the project design plans, specifications, and special provisions; and (7) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project (Project) is funded by the City of Redding’s (City) Streets Division and is included in its approved budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 196,200
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 1,793,557
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 239,000
Additional City Manager Authority $ 50,000
Total Project Costs $ 2,278,757
Project Budget $ 2,300,000
MEETING DATE: August 4, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5606 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing 2025 Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace Report to Redding City Council July 29, 2025
Re: 4.11(f)--Award BN 5606 Replace AC Surfacing 2025 Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates, and adjustments may be necessary to reallocate funds and ensure the project remains within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to award the project or provide alternate direction to staff. If the project is not awarded, the planned annual maintenance will not occur and the streets will continue to deteriorate and may require complete roadway reconstruction.

Background/Analysis
This project involves placing approximately 9,100 tons of asphalt concrete pavement in worn and deteriorated sections of Hartnell Avenue. The project includes other associated work items:

ADA curb ramps, sidewalk replacement, improvements to the Alta Mesa Drive/Hartnell Avenue intersection, pavement delineation, pavement markings, pavement markers, and other miscellaneous items.

Attached is a tabulation of bids opened on July 22, 2025. The low bid in the amount of $1,630,457 was received from J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer’s estimate was $1,688,779. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $196,200. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and consultant services (design support).

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 (c). Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. The project will extend the life of the existing pavement, but will not create additional vehicle capacity or result in expansion of use.

The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
^Bid Tab

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace APPROVED Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 (4.11(c)--Accept Bid Schedule No. 5606, Replace BID TABULATION FOR:

Replace AC Surfacing 2025
Bid Schedule No.: 5606
ENGINEER'S EST J F Shea Construction, Inc.
7/22/2025 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $795.00 $795.00 $750.00 $750.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $170,000.00 $170,000.00 $168,255.00 $168,255.00 $137,800.84 $137,800.84 3 Project Funding Sign EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 4 Construction Area Sign EA 24 $300.00 $7,200.00 $225.00 $5,400.00 $225.00 $5,400.00 5 Asphalt Concrete (1/2" PG 64-10) TON 9100 $92.00 $837,200.00 $96.00 $873,600.00 $110.00 $1,001,000.00 6 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SY 39200 $3.00 $117,600.00 $3.95 $154,840.00 $5.50 $215,600.00 7 Pavement Fabric SY 11867 $2.50 $29,667.50 $3.00 $35,601.00 $2.48 $29,430.16 8 Shoulder Backing LF 10350 $3.50 $36,225.00 $2.00 $20,700.00 $4.00 $41,400.00 9 Asphalt Concrete Dike (Type E) LF 404 $30.00 $12,120.00 $24.00 $9,696.00 $23.00 $9,292.00 10 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 50 $350.00 $17,500.00 $285.00 $14,250.00 $275.00 $13,750.00 11 Traffic Loop EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 12 Sidewalk (4"PCC) SF 713 $22.00 $15,686.00 $28.00 $19,964.00 $16.00 $11,408.00 13 Curb And Gutter LF 116 $72.00 $8,352.00 $108.00 $12,528.00 $36.00 $4,176.00 14 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 667 $45.00 $30,015.00 $34.00 $22,678.00 $20.40 $13,606.80 15 Cross Gutter and Spandrel (Concrete) SF 550 $65.00 $35,750.00 $31.00 $17,050.00 $18.00 $9,900.00 16 Thermoplastic Traffice Stripe (6") LF 65346 $1.75 $114,355.50 $1.25 $81,682.50 $1.20 $78,415.20 17 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (8") LF 1616 $2.50 $4,040.00 $2.00 $3,232.00 $2.00 $3,232.00 18 Pavement Marking (Green Bike Lane) SF 3684 $25.00 $92,100.00 $12.00 $44,208.00 $15.00 $55,260.00 19 Pavement Markings (Thermoplastic) SF 2768 $16.00 $44,288.00 $10.00 $27,680.00 $8.00 $22,144.00 20 Pavement Markers EA 1375 $12.00 $16,500.00 $8.50 $11,687.50 $5.00 $6,875.00 21 Curb Marking (Red) LF 107 $10.00 $1,070.00 $5.00 $535.00 $7.00 $749.00 22 Object Markers EA 3 $120.00 $360.00 $85.00 $255.00 $85.00 $255.00 23 Install Sign EA 24 $750.00 $18,000.00 $450.00 $10,800.00 $450.00 $10,800.00 24 Remove Sign EA 3 $200.00 $600.00 $100.00 $300.00 $100.00 $300.00 25 Adjust Valve Box EA 35 $850.00 $29,750.00 $995.00 $34,825.00 $1,250.00 $43,750.00 26 Adjust Manhole EA 24 $1,200.00 $28,800.00 $1,600.00 $38,400.00 $1,250.00 $30,000.00 27 Adjust Monument EA 13 $1,200.00 $15,600.00 $1,015.00 $13,195.00 $1,250.00 $16,250.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $1,688,779.00 $1,630,457.00 $1,769,844.00 Tullis, Inc

Page 1 of 2 ends

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 (4.11(c)-- BID TABULATION FOR:

Replace AC Surfacing 2025
Bid Schedule No.: 5606
7/22/2025
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 2 Traffic Control LS 1 3 Project Funding Sign EA 1 4 Construction Area Sign EA 24 5 Asphalt Concrete (1/2" PG 64-10) TON 9100 6 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SY 39200 7 Pavement Fabric SY 11867 8 Shoulder Backing LF 10350 9 Asphalt Concrete Dike (Type E) LF 404 10 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 50
11 Traffic Loop EA1
12 Sidewalk (4"PCC) SF 713
13 Curb And Gutter LF 116
14 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 667
15 Cross Gutter and Spandrel (Concrete) SF 550
16 Thermoplastic Traffice Stripe (6") LF 65346
17 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (8") LF 1616
18 Pavement Marking (Green Bike Lane) SF 3684
19 Pavement Markings (Thermoplastic) SF 2768
20 Pavement Markers EA 1375
21 Curb Marking (Red) LF 107
22 Object Markers EA3
23 Install Sign EA 24
24 Remove Sign EA3
25 Adjust Valve Box EA 35
26 Adjust Manhole EA 24
27 Adjust Monument EA 13

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Average

UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$1,000.00 $1,000.00 $848.33
$152,000.00 $152,000.00 $152,685.28
$800.00 $800.00 $800.00
$225.00 $5,400.00 $225.00
$120.00 $1,092,000.00 $108.67
$3.00 $117,600.00 $4.15
$3.00 $35,601.00 $2.83
$4.45 $46,057.50 $3.48
$24.00 $9,696.00 $23.67
$166.00 $8,300.00 $242.00
$7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
$27.00 $19,251.00 $23.67
$80.00 $9,280.00 $74.67
$37.50 $25,012.50 $30.63
$38.60 $21,230.00 $29.20
$1.20 $78,415.20 $1.22
$2.00 $3,232.00 $2.00
$15.00 $55,260.00 $14.00
$8.00 $22,144.00 $8.67
$5.00 $6,875.00 $6.17
$7.00 $749.00 $6.33
$85.00 $255.00 $85.00
$450.00 $10,800.00 $450.00
$100.00 $300.00 $100.00
$1,050.00 $36,750.00 $1,098.33
$1,100.00 $26,400.00 $1,316.67
$1,100.00 $14,300.00 $1,121.67
Average Bid
$1,806,208.20 $1,735,503.07
S. T. Rhoades Construction,
Inc

Page 2 of 2 ends

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - August 4, 2025, Item no. 4.11(f) - Award replace AC 2025 (4.11(c)--

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Schedule (BS) No. 5685, Testing and Repair of Backflow Prevention Assemblies:
(1) Award BS No. 5685 to the lowest bidder, Chris Jaeger Construction & Testing, at a total annual cost of $288,250;
(2) If mutually agreeable, with all unit prices, terms, and conditions remaining the same, authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the contract annually for two additional oneyear periods, through June 30, 2029; (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve contract amendments up to $40,000 annually to cover unanticipated additional repair costs and additional units added through development; and
(4) Find the action categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The Testing and Repairing Backflow Prevention Assemblies is being funded by the City of Redding’s (City) Water Utility Fund. The Water Utility Fund has sufficient 2026-27 Fiscal Year budget and future allocated Fiscal Year budget to support contract extensions.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose to not award the new bid for Testing and Repairing Backflow Prevention Assemblies and provide staff with alternate direction. Staff will be unable to complete the required testing and inspection, and the Water Utility may experience cross contamination issues or be subject to administrative fines or other regulatory action.

MEETING DATE: May 19, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award BS 5685 Testing and Repair of Backflow Prevention Assemblies Michael Webb, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 279
Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2026
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Bid Schedule 5685, Backflow Testing Page 2 Background/Analysis
Backflow prevention assemblies, also known as cross connection control devices, require testing per the State Water Resources Control Board, the United States Environmental Protection Agency 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act, Uniform Plumbing Code and the Redding Municipal Code. The Public Works Department’s Cross Connection Control program prevents an unprotected connection between the City’s water system supply and any source or system containing unapproved water or a substance that is not, or cannot be approved as, safe for drinking water.

The work includes testing and repair of over 3,308 private backflow prevention devices throughout the City. The cost is based on a fixed, per-unit, price for each device, plus an estimated amount for repairs. If more faulty devices are discovered than anticipated, additional repair costs will be incurred.

A solicitation for bids was posted on the City’s website, bid opportunity notices were distributed to five potential vendors, distributed to three Builders’ Exchanges, and advertised in the Record Searchlight. Two bids were submitted. The apparent low bid was received from Chris Jaeger Construction & Testing with a total annual evaluated price of $288,250.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that it is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing facilities. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use.

The contractor will perform the required testing and repair; however, this work will result in no expansion of use. The backflow assemblies are located above ground and in meter boxes. These locations have no underlying value for sensitive environmental resources, and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Bid Tabulation 5685
NOE Water Utility Backflow Testing and Repair
Packet Pg. 280
CITY OF REDDING pg 1 of 1

PURCHASING DIVISION - BID TABULATION

TEST AND REPAIR BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES

BID DATE OF OPENING
5685 WEDNESDAY, April 22, 2026

TIME OF OPENING
3:00 P.M.

QTY UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
3,308 $50.00 $165,400.00 $98.00 $324,184.00
50 $550.00 $27,500.00 $600.00 $30,000.00
50 $750.00 $37,500.00 $950.00 $47,500.00
2 $800.00 $1,600.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00
450 $125.00 $56,250.00 $175.00 $78,750.00
$288,250.00 $482,834.00

TEST CHARGE PER UNIT
CLEANING & RPR CHG 2 1/2" TO 4"
CLEANING & RPR CHG 6" TO 8"

TOTAL ANNUAL EVALUATED PRICE
Chris Jaeger Construction &
Testing Western Waters, Inc.

CLEANING & RPR CHG 10"
CLEANING & RPR CHG 2" AND SMALLER

DESCRIPTION
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Bid Tabulation 5685 (4.11(d)--Award Bid Schedule 5685, Backflow Testing) Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: NOE Water Utility Backflow Testing and Repair (4.11(d)--Award Bid Schedule 5685, Backflow Testing)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution amending the Local Road Safety Plan; (2) Find that the Local Road Safety Plan amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies; and
(3) Authorize staff to submit a United States Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Program application in an amount not-to-exceed $15 million for the design and construction of a roundabout and related curve-safety improvements at the intersection of Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road.

Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the Resolution for the amended Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), to include the Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho Roundabout project (Project), will have no fiscal impact to the current approved budget.

If awarded the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant, the City of Redding (City) could receive up to $15 million in federal implementation funding for the Project. The program requires a 20 percent local match, equating to a local funding commitment of approximately $3 million. The match may be satisfied through a combination of, in-kind services, or other eligible local sources. This local match may be funded through the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program, since this project is on the TIF eligibility list and is a high priority for the City, or through other Streets Division funding.

MEETING DATE: May 19, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution amending the current Local Road Safety Plan and Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Program.

Michael Webb, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 283
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2026
Re: 4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4APage 2 By securing this implementation grant, the City would significantly offset the total projected project cost of approximately $15 million with the potential to leverage additional resources and reduce long-term infrastructure liabilities through federal investment. If the City is awarded grant funding for the project, a separate council action will be brought forth to accept the grant funds and the required local match funding source(s) will be identified at such time.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve Resolution nor authorize an SS4A Program grant application; in that case, the City would not be considered for an award and the Project would remain on the Capital Improvement Plan until other funding sources are identified.

Background/Analysis
At its meeting on February 15, 2022, the Council adopted the current LRSP to satisfy evolving state and federal policy requirements and maintain eligibility for transportation safety grant opportunities, including the SS4A program. The adopted LRSP includes a citywide analysis of Redding’s roadway system, including existing collision patterns and systemic high-risk roadway characteristics. The plan’s primary objectives are to identify safety countermeasures that reduce collision frequency and severity, while addressing key emphasis areas such as pedestrian and bicycle safety, distracted driving, intersection-related collisions and aggressive driving behaviors.

Since adoption of the LRSP, staff has conducted additional safety analysis and determined that the Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho intersection exhibits characteristics consistent with a high-risk location, including a documented collision history and systemic risk factors identified in the LRSP. Accordingly, staff recommends amending the LRSP to incorporate the Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho roundabout and associated safety improvements. Staff also recommends removing locations where identified countermeasures have already been implemented or are currently programmed in upcoming projects. Inclusion of the roundabout project within the LRSP will establish consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and satisfy a key eligibility requirement for the SS4A Implementation Grant Program.

The SS4A grant program was established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to support regional, local, and tribal efforts to prevent roadway fatalities and serious injuries. Administered by the U.S. DOT, the program offers $5 billion in competitive funding over five years (Fiscal Year (FY) 2022–2026), with approximately $993 million available in FY 2026.

The SS4A program offers two types of grants:

1. Action Plan Grants – To develop or update comprehensive safety action plans. ($300,000 grant obtained in 2024); and

2. Implementation Grants – To carry out strategies and projects identified in eligible action plans.

The City is currently working to update the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) in its entirety, as part of an Action Plan Grant recently received from this program. The comprehensive update to the LRSP will refresh the plan and help to satisfy the eligibility requirements for a SS4A, Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) or other implementation grant for additional intersections and roadway segments with documented safety concerns. The Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho intersection is a critical safety concern, with documented collision history and substandard geometry contributing to higher-than-average crash rates.

Packet Pg. 284
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2026
Re: 4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4APage 3 The proposed project includes:
• Reconstructing the existing non-signalized intersection into a modern roundabout to improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points;
• Realigning and softening dangerous horizontal curves on all approaches to improve driver sight distance and maneuverability;
• Installing enhanced pedestrian and bicycle crossing features to improve multimodal safety; and
• Implementing new signage, lighting, and drainage infrastructure.

To advance the roundabout project, the City has invested TIF dollars in preliminary engineering, and the environmental review is nearly complete under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City anticipates completing all environmental clearance requirements in the near term and is preparing to initiate right-of-way acquisition activities. These investments position the project to move quickly into design finalization and construction if implementation funding is secured.

This level of project readiness substantially enhances the City’s competitiveness under SS4A evaluation criteria, which prioritize projects demonstrating strong safety benefits, implementation readiness, completed environmental documentation and established planning foundations.

According to research published by the Federal Highway Administration, conversion of traditional stop-controlled intersections to modern roundabouts can reduce injury crashes by approximately 75 percent and fatal or severe crashes by nearly 90 percent. The proposed project directly supports SS4A priorities related to systemic safety improvements, speed management, and context-sensitive roadway design.

Staff initially obtained the Council’s approval to apply for the previous cycle grant funding on June 17, 2025. The City was not awarded the grant at that time with one main factor being that is was not included in the LRSP. The original project scope included the Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho roundabout as well as roadway widening and various associated roadway improvements along Churn Creek Road extending west to the Churn Creek bridge. The project scope has since been modified to end the roadway improvements on Churn Creek Road at Huntington Drive.

The Resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff have reviewed the Local Road Safety Plan amendment and have determined that it is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the CEQA, pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies. A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded does not require the preparation of an Environment Impact Report or Negative Declaration. The LRSP includes strategies and location data that may be used to develop future projects; however, any future action would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA. Amending the plan would not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Packet Pg. 285
Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2026
Re: 4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4APage 4 Technical environmental studies are currently in progress for the Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho Roundabout Project and the project will be reviewed for compliance with CEQA prior to approval. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Resolution
Location Map
LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices)
NOE LRSP_2026
Previous Staff Report 4.11 e Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the US Department of Transportation 6.17.25
Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 Packet Pg. 286
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

TO APPROVE THE AMENDED LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, Council adopted the Local Roadway Safety Plan for the City of Redding; and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan includes a citywide analysis of the roadway system and identifies safety countermeasures to help mitigate primary crash trends and reduce the overall collision severity by addressing multiple challenge areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving; and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan is a requirement for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Safe Streets for All (SS4A) grant applications; and WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended to remove intersections in which countermeasures have been completed or are programmed in upcoming projects as well as incorporate additional intersections and countermeasures identified through public input to ensure the plan reflects current community concerns, roadway safety needs and future project priorities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby:

1. Determines that adoption of the Amended Local Road Safety Plan is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Feasibility and Planning Studies exemption (14 CCR 15262), as the plan would not result in physical alteration of the environment and implementation of any future action would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA; and

2. Approves the amended Local Road Safety Plan.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19st day of May, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
______________________________ ______________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN L. STOCK
Interim City Attorney
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Resolution (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A) Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Location Map (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A) Street Address City State Zip Code
Redding Local Road Safety Plan | February 15, 2022

LOCAL ROAD

SAFETY PLAN
(LRSP)
City of Redding
Final Report
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application

REPORT SIGNATURE SHEET
This Local Road Safety Plan for the City of Redding has been prepared under the direction of the following Professional Engineer. The Registered Civil Engineer attests to the technical information contained herein and the engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based.

Kathryn Savoy Kleinschmidt, PE
Registered Civil Engineer
February 15, 2022
Date
03/31/22
C93262
Kathryn Savoy Kleinschmidt
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.

City of Redding
Mayor and City Council
Public Works Department
Police Department
Fire Department
County of Shasta
Public Works Department
Health and Human Services
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Redding Unified School District
Healthy Shasta Partnership
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2019, the City of Redding was awarded a state grant from Caltrans to perform a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The LRSP is a requirement for Cycle 11 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The LRSP grant application included a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Redding comprising of the current collisions patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis).

Furthermore, the Redding’s goal is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City’s primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity.

The LRSP is a collaborative process that is similar to a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) except a LRSP has a local leadership group that represents the 5 E’s (not just engineering) and public outreach.

The 5 E’s of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies.

This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.

In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) was formed with the City as the lead and local organizations from the 5 E’s and anyone with an interest in improving the City’s roadway safety. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and overall development of the safety plan.

Based on the past 5 years collision analysis and the City’s Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge (Emphasis) Areas including but not limited to:

1. Pedestrians

2. Distracted Driving

3. Bicyclists

4. Intersections

5. Impaired Driving

6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding

7. Roadway Design
a. Additional emphasis area per Stakeholder Working Group not in SHSP In addition, the vision, mission statement, and goals were established in guiding the development of the LRSP. It was also decided that the LRSP for the City of Redding would be a living document with official updated every five (5) years.

Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page iii
Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations in the City. These locations, along with their proposed countermeasures, are shown in the tables below.

Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures

Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Systemic (49 locations) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Increase DUI enforcement
Consolidate driveways
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Bicycle education about riding at night and rules of the road Butte St / Continental
St None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) Market St / Riverside
Dr Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.)
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Increase DUI enforcement
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli
Ln
South St / California St
Systemic (9 locations)
Victor Ave / Hartnell
Ave
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave
Airport Rd / Preserve
Blvd
E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress
Ave
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page iv
Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures
It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable (next cycle 11 is scheduled to open in April 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources to include
 Active Transportation Program (ATP)
o Next call for funding projects is scheduled to start in March 2022  Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program
 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (Sustainable Communities)  Stimulus funding sources
 Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Add segment lighting (East of I-5 Interchange)
Install raised median (Between Hilltop Dr and Churn Creek Rd) Install bike lanes/Install separated bike lanes
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install raised median (Between Dana Dr and Browning Dr) Install edge-lines and centerlines (between Ross/Big-Lots Driveway and Margalia St) Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk to guide pedestrians to the enhanced crosswalk with RRFB
Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Install multiuse path/ sharrow on eastbound approach to the intersection of W Cypress Ave/ Market St
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Add Segment Lighting
Install curve advance warning signs
Increase DUI enforcement
Add Segment Lighting
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Install raised median (on the approaches to Hartnell Ave) Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs S Bonnyview Rd (S
Market St to Churn
Creek Rd)
Install Separated Bike Lanes
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress
Ave to n/o 3rd St)
Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd)
W Cypress Ave (Market
St to Park Marina Dr)
Churn Creek Rd
(Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o
Browning St to
Maraglia St)
E Cypress Ave (Park
Marina Dr to Churn
Creek Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding
Hilltop Apartments to
St Thomas Pkwy)
Hartnell Ave
(Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd)
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1

2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2

2.1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 2 City Roadways .................................................................................................. 3 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan ......................................................... 4

3. SAFETY PARTNERS/STAKEHOLDERS .................................................................................... 6 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings ............................................................. 6

3.2 SHSP Challenge/Emphasis Areas ..................................................................................... 7

3.3 Guiding Principles .............................................................................................................. 7 Vision Zero ........................................................................................................ 7 Vision ................................................................................................................ 8 Mission Statement ............................................................................................ 9 Goals ................................................................................................................ 9

4. ANALYZE SAFETY DATA ......................................................................................................... 10

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects ...................................................................................... 10 Active Transportation Program (ATP) ............................................................ 10 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) .............................................. 11 SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan ................................................................... 13

4.2 Collision Data ................................................................................................................... 14 Collisions on City Roadways .......................................................................... 14 Collisions on Caltrans Roadways ................................................................... 18 Collisions Related to Challenge Areas ........................................................... 19

4.2.3.1 Pedestrians ..................................................................................................... 19

4.2.3.2 Distracted Driving ........................................................................................... 21

4.2.3.3 Bicyclists ......................................................................................................... 22

4.2.3.4 Intersections ................................................................................................... 23

4.2.3.5 Impaired Driving .............................................................................................. 24

5. PUBLIC OUTREACH ................................................................................................................. 25

5.1 Public Website ................................................................................................................. 25 Interactive Map ............................................................................................... 25 Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page vi
Public Survey .................................................................................................. 27

6. IDENTIFY STRATEGIES ........................................................................................................... 31

6.1 Engineering Strategies ..................................................................................................... 31 City Intersection Projects ................................................................................ 31 City Segment Analysis .................................................................................... 33 Speed Mitigation ............................................................................................. 34

6.1.3.1 Traffic Calming ................................................................................................ 34

6.1.3.2 Assembly Bill No. 43 ....................................................................................... 35 Systemic Safety Countermeasures ................................................................ 35

6.1.4.1 Leading Pedestrian Intervals .......................................................................... 36 Projects Suggested through Public Input ....................................................... 38 Additional Safety Projects ............................................................................... 38

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies ............................................................................................. 39 Education ........................................................................................................ 39 Emerging Technologies .................................................................................. 39 Enforcement ................................................................................................... 39 Emergency Response .................................................................................... 39

7. PRIORITIZE & INCORPORATE STRATEGIES ........................................................................ 41

8. EVALUATION PROCESS .......................................................................................................... 44

9. NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................. 47

10. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 48

FIGURE INDEX
Figure 1 California SHSP (2020-2024) ............................................................................................ 1 Figure 2 FHWA’s LRSP Development Process ............................................................................... 1 Figure 3 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Redding ................................................. 2 Figure 5 FHWA’s LRSP Development Map ..................................................................................... 5 Figure 6 Traditional Approach vs. Vision Zero ................................................................................ 8 Figure 7 Recent and Planned Safety Projects in Redding ............................................................ 12 Figure 8 Total Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019) ............................................................. 14 Figure 9 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways ................................................................... 15 Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page vii
Figure 10 Collision Density on City Roads (2015-2019) .................................................................. 15 Figure 12 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019) ......................................................................... 17 Figure 13 Collision Density on Caltrans Roads ............................................................................... 19 Figure 14 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision ......................................................................... 20 Figure 15 Density of Pedestrian Collisions ...................................................................................... 21 Figure 16 Type of Inattention for Distracted Driving Collisions........................................................ 22 Figure 17 Top Violation Categories for Bicycle-Related Collisions ................................................. 22 Figure 18 Density of Bicycle Collisions ............................................................................................ 23 Figure 19 Top Violation Categories for Intersection-Related Collisions .......................................... 24 Figure 20 Collision Types for DUI/BUI Collisions ............................................................................ 24 Figure 21 Public Website Home Page ............................................................................................. 25 Figure 22 Public Website Interactive Map ....................................................................................... 27 Figure 23 Public-Identified Roadway Issues.................................................................................... 28 Figure 24 Responses to “Which of the following bikeways would you feel comfortable using?” .... 28 Figure 25 Responses to “Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?” ....................................................... 29 Figure 26 Locations of Proposed Leading Pedestrian Intervals ...................................................... 37 Figure 27 Low Resource Neighborhoods and Priority Locations in Redding .................................. 46

TABLE INDEX
Table 1 Fatal Collisions on City of Redding Roadways (2015-2019) ............................................. 3 Table 2 Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars) ............................... 17 Table 3 Top Intersections, per Collision Analysis ......................................................................... 18 Table 4 Top Segments, per Collision Analysis ............................................................................. 18 Table 5 Priority Intersections and Crash Rates ............................................................................ 32 Table 6 Priority Segments and Crash Rates ................................................................................ 33 Table 7 Recommended Systemic Safety Countermeasures ....................................................... 36 Table 8 Projects Suggested through Public Input ........................................................................ 38 Table 9 Priority of City Intersection Projects ................................................................................ 42 Table 10 Priority of City Segment Projects ..................................................................................... 43 Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page viii

APPENDIX INDEX
Appendix A Collision Data
Appendix B Stakeholder and Public Input
Appendix C Previous Safety Plans and Projects
Appendix D Recommended Projects

Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page ix

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
APS Accessible Pedestrian Signal
ATP Active Transportation Program or Plan
BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio
BUI Biking Under the Influence
CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CIP Capital Improvement Program
CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FSI Fatal or Severe Injury
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual
LRSP Local Road Safety Plan
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SSAR Systemic Safety Analysis Report
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 1

1. INTRODUCTION
The project involves the development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), which provides local agencies an opportunity to address unique roadway safety needs in their jurisdictions. This comprehensive document will both help to guide City in safety countermeasures and allow eligibility for funding in future HSIP applications. The process of preparing an LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze local safety problems and recommend engineering safety improvements for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding.

Figure 1 California SHSP (2020-2024)
Preparing an LRSP facilitates local agency
partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a
prioritized list of improvements and actions that
contribute to California’s Strategic Highway Safety
Plan (SHSP) overall vision and goals. This SHSP
focuses on reducing fatal and severe injury collisions
(FSI collisions) with focused challenge areas with a
focus on the Five “E’s” of Traffic Safety (see Figure
1).

The City and GHD will follow the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Local Road Safety six (6) step process as shown in Figure 2:

Figure 2 FHWA’s LRSP Development Process
In working with the first step of establishing leadership, Shelby Nadin, Traffic Operations Manager, was identified as the Safety Champion/Lead for this project with a stakeholder working group that consisted of the other E’s (enforcement, education, emergency response, and emerging technologies) and other important safety partners. This stakeholder working group was paramount in creating a comprehensive safety plan that is tailored to address the local needs and issues.

Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 2

2. BACKGROUND

2.1 Purpose and Need
The City of Redding has a current approximate population of 91,000 and is located in Shasta County, California. Redding’s “2000-2020 General Plan” evaluates how the City growth and development will occur. The Transportation Element of this plan contains fifteen (15) goals for Redding’s transportation system. The goals include providing safe, efficient, and comfortable multimodal transportation, creating Complete Street systems, maintaining downtown’s vitality, improving safety at railroad crossings, promoting public transit, and protecting residential neighborhoods from excessive through traffic.

In focusing in on the roadway safety needs, the past five (5) years of collisions (2015-2019) were evaluated for the City roadways and the fatal collisions are discussed below. Figure 3 presents a map of the twenty-four (24) fatal and ninety-three (93) severe injury collisions in the City from the past five years.

More information on fatal and severe injury (FSI) collisions is located in Appendix A: Collision Data.

Figure 3 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Redding Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 3
City Roadways
During the five-year period (2015-2019), there were twenty-four (24) fatal collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of Redding’s jurisdiction. The fatal collisions on City streets had the following characteristics (see Table 1 below):

Table 1 Fatal Collisions on City of Redding Roadways (2015-2019) In improving roadway safety for the City of Redding, it is important to focus on mitigating these high injury collisions and loss of life.

2.2 Standards and Guidelines
In developing the City of Redding LRSP, the following standards and guidelines were followed:

Year Location Type Violation Other Information
2015 Hartnell Avenue, 147 feet west of Airport Road Overturned DUI Single vehicle 2015 Bechelli Lane, 129 feet south of Beagle Lane VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk
2015 Railroad Avenue, 1264 feet north of
Buenaventura Boulevard
VehiclePedestrian - Pedestrian was not in the road
2015 Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue Broadside Unsafe Speed Motorcycle collision 2015 Butte Street and Continental Street Head On Automobile Right of Way Bicycle collision
2015 Airport Road and Preserve Boulevard Broadside Improper Turning Bicycle collision 2015 Delta Street at Santa Fe Avenue Broadside Automobile Right of Way -
2016 Hilltop Drive, 1062 feet north of Peppertree
Lane
VehiclePedestrianPedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk
2016 Cypress Avenue, 360 feet west of Athens
Avenue
VehiclePedestrianPedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk
2016 Hartnell Avenue at Northwoods Drive Broadside DUI - 2016 Buenaventura Boulevard and Lakeside Drive Broadside Automobile Right of Way -
2017 Hartnell Avenue, 250 feet east of Churn Creek
Road Broadside Automobile Right
of Way Bicycle collision
2017 Hartnell Avenue at Middleton Lane Broadside Automobile Right of Way Motorcycle collision
2017 Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue Rear End DUI / Unsafe Speed -
2017 Beltline Road and Mountain Lakes Boulevard Broadside Automobile Right of Way -
2017 Market Street at Riverside Drive VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation -
2018 Churn Creek Road, 106 feet south of Presidio
Street Hit Object Unsafe Lane
Change Single vehicle
2018 Cypress Avenue, 165 feet west of Rosemary
Avenue
VehiclePedestrianPedestrian Right
of Way
Pedestrian was crossing in a
crosswalk not at an intersection
2018 South Street and California Street. Broadside Traffic Signals and Signs -
2018 Hartnell Avenue and Bechelli Lane VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing in a
crosswalk at an intersection
2018 Railroad Avenue and Placer Street VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing in a
crosswalk at an intersection
2019 Hilltop Drive, 548 feet north of Mistletoe Lane VehiclePedestrian DUI Pedestrian was crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection at night
2019 Hartnell Ave and Shotwick Trail Hit Object Unsafe Speed Single vehicle collisions where motorcycle ran off the road
2019 Old Eureka Way and Walnut Avenue Hit Object Wrong Side of Road Single vehicle
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 4
 “Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020.
 2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.
 “Local and Rural Road Safety Briefing Sheets: Local Road Safety Plans,” Federal Highway Administration, November 2014.
 “Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012.
 “Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool,” Federal Highway Administration, 2013.  “Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.
 “California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.

California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
The LRSP will complement California’s SHSP 2020-2024. Per this plan the recommended challenge areas area shown in Figure 4. These challenge areas are recommended emphasis areas in the development of the plan.

Figure 4 SHSP Challenge Areas

2.3 LRSP Methodology
The LRSP methodology followed the FHWA’s LRSP development process as shown in Figure 5.

Below is a roadmap created by the Federal Highway Administration to show the process of creating the Local Road Safety Plan. Here are the primary steps used to create this plan:

Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 5

1. Identify Stakeholders
a. Stakeholder Working Group was formed of the 5 E’s and other safety partners.

2. Use Safety Data
a. Past 5 years of collisions were analysed with discussion of other high-risk locations.

3. Chose Proven Solutions
a. FHWA Proven Countermeasures and Caltrans safety countermeasures were used in mitigation collision trends and risk characteristics.

4. Implement Solutions
a. Projects were identified for specific locations and systemically.

Figure 5 FHWA’s LRSP Development Map
Source: Federal Highway Administration

Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 6

3. SAFETY PARTNERS/STAKEHOLDERS

3.1 LRSP Stakeholder Working Group Members
Based on community connections, the City of Redding led the formation of the LRSP Stakeholder Working Member Group. This leadership group was crucial in the development of the LRSP and helped in capturing the safety needs, goals, and priorities including safety countermeasures for the City of Redding.

The LRSP Stakeholder Working Group included the
following representatives:
 City of Redding
 Caltrans
 Shasta County Public Works
 Redding Police Department
 Redding Fire Department
 Redding Unified School District
 Health Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and Human Services
 Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA)
Stakeholder Working Group Meetings
Two meetings were held with the stakeholder working group and facilitated by GHD. The virtual meetings were as follows:

1. December 10, 2020 – 10 a.m. to noon
a. Discussed the LRSP overall process, stakeholder working group member’s safety priorities, past 5 years of collisions (City and Caltrans roadways), vision, goals, and priorities.

2. May 3, 2021 – 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
a. Reviewed first meeting, discussed public comments and ways to address their concerns, recent developments, safety countermeasures and projects, refined of LRSP’s guiding principles, and coordinated next steps.

The meeting summaries for the stakeholder working group meetings are in Appendix B: Stakeholder and Public Input. The stakeholder working group also provided their feedback and comments on the Draft Local Road Safety Plan document before the plan was finalized. With many of the safety countermeasures to include engineering, enforcement, and emergency response, it is important to have buy off from the stakeholders in understanding how the plan will be implemented.

Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 7

3.2 SHSP Challenge/Emphasis Areas
Based on the LRSP Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas and additional emphasis areas, as suggested by the stakeholders, including:

1. Pedestrians
a. Focus on pedestrian crossings and enhancing existing pedestrian crossings. b. Safety around school zones

2. Distracted Driving
a. Rear end collisions due to distracted driving

3. Bicyclists
a. Reduce wrong-way cycling

4. Intersections
a. Find beneficial projects on west side of the City

5. Impaired Driving
a. Focus enforcement to mitigate DUI/BUI collisions

6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding
a. Speed management
i. Traffic calming devices to mitigate speed

7. Roadway Design
a. Geometric design to provide for all users
i. Identify lack of accommodations and connections for bike, ped, and transit users
ii. Provide access management as appropriate

3.3 Guiding Principles
The members of the stakeholder working group coordinated to establish the vision, mission statement, and goals that guided the development of the document. Ideally, this document will help the City move toward Vision Zero. The aim of Vision Zero is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traditionally, traffic deaths and severe injuries have been considered as inevitable side effects of modern life. The reality is that these tragedies can be addressed over time by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.

Vision Zero
Vision Zero is a significant departure from the status quo in two major ways:
 Vision Zero recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to minimize those inevitable mistakes and reduce their likeliness to result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 8
expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. Roadway users are however still responsible for their mistakes and should follow all applicable laws and use reasonable judgement when conducting themselves within the public right of way.
 Vision Zero is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. In the past, meaningful, cross-disciplinary collaboration among local traffic planners and engineers, policymakers, and public health professionals has not been the norm. Vision Zero acknowledges that many factors contribute to safe mobility -- including roadway design, speeds, behaviors, technology, and policies -- and sets clear goals to achieve the shared goal of zero fatalities and severe injuries.

As shown in Figure 6, is the comparison of the traditional approach versus the Vision Zero approach.

Figure 6 Traditional Approach vs. Vision Zero
Vision
A vision statement describes what the Local Road Safety Plan is trying to achieve.

Redding will develop a comprehensive
safety plan with engagement of
stakeholders and citizens that encourages
improved safety for all users, whether it is
walking, biking, and driving – because
every person in our community matters.

Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 9
Mission Statement
The mission statement defines the purpose of the plan, what it does, and what it is about. The mission statement was developed in collaboration with the stakeholder working group.

Goals
Safety goals were development for the Local Road Safety Plan. It is important to capture realistic goals that can be measurable or evolve over time.

Goal: Reduce the potential for fatal and
severe injury collisions citywide.

Goal: Create a safe, livable, and
welcoming community by developing a
roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s
transportation and roadway safety needs.

Goal: Improve safety around schools.

Goal: Reduce speeding collisions through
engineering, enforcement, and education
strategies.

Goal: Improve multimodal transportation
safety by expanding the City’s nonmotorized transportation infrastructure.

Goal: Improve the health and vitality of our community by working with community safety partners to create a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s needs.

Goal: Reduce rear end collisions citywide by implementing speed management strategies.

Goal: Prioritize improvements that affect conditions/safety outcomes for identified disadvantaged populations.

The City of Redding shall utilize a data‐
driven approach to provide a safe,
sustainable, and equitable multimodal
transportation system for all users of the
public roadway network in Redding.

Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 10

4. ANALYZE SAFETY DATA

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects
The City of Redding and Caltrans have conducted some previous safety analysis that has developed the following planned safety projects. The primary source of funding for the current safety projects in the City are the Caltrans’ Active Transportation Program and Highway Safety Improvement Program. Refer to Appendix C: Previous Safety Plans and Projects for specific project details and additional funding sources for other safety projects.

Active Transportation Program (ATP)
The City of Redding received one (1) ATP grant from Cycle 1, two (2) ATP grants from Cycle 2, two (2) ATP grants from Cycle 3, and was recently approved for two (2) ATP applications for Cycle 5.

The details of the ATP projects are as follows:

1. An ATP, Cycle 1 grant was awarded to Redding for the “Placer Street Improvements” project from south of Boston Avenue to Mesa Street. These improvements included sidewalk and curb improvements, signage and striping improvements, and signal modifications. Construction is completed for this project.

2. Two ATP, Cycle 2 grants were awarded for the “Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvements” project and “Quartz Hill Road Improvements” project. The “Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvements” project included signage and striping improvements, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) installation, and buffered bike lanes and will be in construction in 2021. The “Quartz Hill Road Improvements” project limits are Quartz Hill Road from south of Terra Nova Street to Brenton Drive and from west of Delta Street to State Route 273. This project includes road widening and pedestrian crossing improvements.

3. Two ATP, Cycle 3 grants were awarded for the “West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project” and “Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements” project. Both projects are currently in design. The “West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project” includes curb and gutter improvements, curb bulb-outs, pedestrian improvements, RRFB installation, additional bicycle markings, buffered bike lanes, and lighting installation. The “Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements” project includes the construction of a mix of buffered bike lanes, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing beacons, pedestrian refuge islands, pedestrian safety amenities including safety lighting, and functional landscaping including shade trees and buffers from traffic.

4. Two ATP, Cycle 5 applications were submitted for the “Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project” and the “Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation” project. Both projects were recently funded. The “Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project” includes the installation of a buffered 2-way cycle track, shared use path, raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards, lane reductions, raised crosswalks with bicycle and pedestrian separations, and shade trees. The “Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation” project plans to construct shared use paths, sidewalks, curb ramps, bike lanes, and protected intersections.

Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 11
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The City of Redding received HSIP grants from Cycle 7, Cycle 8, and Cycle 9, and recently applied for two (2) grants from HSIP Cycle 10. The details of the HSIP projects are as follows:

1. An HSIP, Cycle 7 grant was awarded for the “Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project” and is currently in construction. The “Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project” includes striping improvements, ADA upgrades, lighting improvements, and the installation of a raised median. The project is located on Hartnell Avenue from Churn Creek Road to East Way.

2. An HSIP, Cycle 8 grant was awarded for the “Churn Creek Rd and Maraglia St Safety Improvements” project and will begin construction in 2021. The “Churn Creek Rd and Maraglia St Safety Improvements” project includes curb ramp improvements, additional lighting, and striping improvements on Maraglia Street and Churn Creek Road from E Cypress Road to Hartnell Avenue.

3. An HSIP, Cycle 9 grant was awarded for the “Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements” project at nine (9) different intersections throughout the City and is currently in design. The “Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements” project proposed various enhancements at the intersections including ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, refuge island/concrete medians, and detectable warning surface upgrades.

4. Two HSIP, Cycle 10 applications were awarded for the “Systemic Protected Left Turn Project” at four (4) locations throughout the City and the “Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project” at nineteen (19) intersections in the City. The “Systemic Protected Left Turn Project” proposed various upgrades such as micro-surfacing, striping improvements, installation of new traffic signal pole and mast arm, and ADA curb return upgrades. The “Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project” adds new or additional lighting to intersections.

The City was also awarded funding for Cycles 2 through 6 of the HSIP. These projects were not considered for further analysis in the LRSP since they were awarded prior to 2015. These projects include:
 HSIP, Cycle 2: Buenaventura Widening at SR 273
 HSIP, Cycle 3: Old Oregon Trail/Oasis Road Safety Project  HSIP, Cycle 4: Lake Blvd. Safety Project and Buenaventura Blvd. Safety Project  HSIP, Cycle 5: East Cypress Ave. Median Project and Churn Creek Road Widening Project  HSIP, Cycle 6: Victor Ave. Safety Project and Old Oregon Trail Widening Project The recent and planned safety projects in the City are mapped in Figure 7. These projects include funding sources from ATP and HSIP (as shown above) and other funding sources to include Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (ASHC/STI), Section 130, and the City’s Capital Improvement Program funding. For more information on these safety projects, see Appendix C: Previous Safety Plans and Projects.

Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application FIGURE 7
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 03/11/2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\Upcoming Safety Projects-no labels.mxd
Print date: 23 Jun 2021 - 07:46
Legend
Project Type
ATP, Cycle 1
ATP, Cycle 2
ATP, Cycle 3
ATP, Cycle 5
HSIP, Cycle 6
HSIP, Cycle 7
HSIP, Cycle 8
HSIP, Cycle 9
HSIP, Cycle 10

ASHC/STI
Section 130
City CIP
City of Redding
City Limit

CURRENT/UPCOMING SAFETY

PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF REDDING

CITY OF

REDDING
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A) GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 13
SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan
In 2020, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) was awarded $500,000 for the State Route 273 Multimodal Corridor through a Strategic Partnerships Grant with Caltrans. This grant was for the northern section of SR 273 through Redding (northern terminus to Canyon Road). Caltrans also awarded a $500,000 Special Studies Grant for work on the southern section of SR 273 (Canyon Road to southern terminus).

SRTA hopes to combine the funding for both projects to create a comprehensive multimodal corridor plan for SR 273. If approved by Caltrans, SRTA will coordinate the scope of work with Redding and other affected cities. This project will likely include several multimodal and safety improvements on SR 273 that will benefit the City of Anderson.

Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 14

4.2 Collision Data
The City of Redding collision data was gathered using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). The Redding Police Department provided additional detail to several of the collisions from the SWITRS database. Each data set was analyzed, crosschecked, and compiled into one complete comprehensive data set. This process was done to ensure that all reported collisions occurring within the City are accounted for and to provide additional information that one system may not have captured. The data set contains five years’ worth of collisions spanning from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019.

These collisions were classified based on roadway jurisdiction (City or Caltrans). During this period, a total of 3468 collisions were reported in the City of Redding. Collisions were further categorized into intersection related collisions and roadway segment related collisions with a separate focus on the City streets and Caltrans roadways.

The pie chart in Figure 8 depicts the number of City collisions by collision location (intersection or segment). The highest number of collisions was at City intersections (1320 collisions).

Figure 8 Total Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019)
Collisions on City Roadways
There were 2364 collisions recorded on the City roadways between 2015 and 2019. The top five violation categories in order (not including unknown or not stated collisions) for City roadways are shown in the Figure 9. As shown on the collision density map (see Figure 10 below), areas with high density of collisions are mostly concentrated in the downtown area and on the following arterials: E Cypress Avenue, Churn Creek Road, and Hartnell Avenue. There were twenty-four (24) fatal collisions and ninety-three (93) severe injury collisions on the City roadways. Broadside collisions were the most common collision type.

Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 15
Figure 9 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways
Figure 10 Collision Density on City Roads (2015-2019)
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 16
Figure 11 presents a collision density map of the FSI collisions on City of Redding roadways between 2015 and 2019. As seen through this map, the intersection of Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue has a high density of FSI collisions.

Figure 11 Collision Density of Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions on City Roads (2015-2019) Figure 12 summarizes the City collisions based on severity and type.

Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 17
Figure 12 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019)
The total number of collisions and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating were assessed to determine the top study intersections (refer to Appendix A: Collision Data). Per the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual, it is recommended to rank locations with higher severity as higher focus. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology of Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating assigns a weight to collisions in capturing the relative severity in equivalent property damage only (PDO =1).

Table 2 provides the comprehensive collision costs and EPDO weights that were used in ranking the collisions. Collision costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct crash costs include ambulance service, police and fire services, property damage, insurance, and other costs directly related to the crashes. Indirect collision costs account for the value society would place on pain and suffering or loss of life associated with the crash.

Table 2 Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars) Severity Comprehensive Costs EPDO Weight
Fatal (K) $6,418,400 544
Severe Injury (A) $345,800 30
Minor Injury (B) $126,500 11
Non-Visible Injury (C) $71,900 6
PDO (O) $11,800 1
Based on Table 7-1, Highway Safety Manual, 2010, Adjusted to 2018 dollars.

Table 3 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis. The intersection of Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue had the highest EPDO score at 1223 and the highest number of collisions at 32.

Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 18
Table 3 Top Intersections, per Collision Analysis
Intersection EPDO Total Crashes
Churn Creek Rd / Hartnell Ave 1223 32
South St / California St 588 10
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli Ln 587 9
Airport Rd / Preserve Blvd 562 4
Butte St / Continental St 562 4
Market St / Riverside Dr 551 3
Hartnell Ave / Northwoods Way 544 1
Churn Creek Rd / E Cypress Ave 169 29
Victor Ave / Hartnell Ave 151 22
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress Ave 127 22
E Cypress Ave / Bechelli Ln 85 20
The segment collisions were also analyzed by EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 4 shows the top segments, per collision analysis. Churn Creek Road between Presidio Street and S Bonnyview Road had the highest EPDO rating (1021) and number of collisions (73).

Table 4 Top Segments, per Collision Analysis
Road Name EPDO Total Crashes
Churn Creek Rd (Presidio St to S Bonnyview Rd) 1021 73
E Cypress Ave (Park Marina Dr to Churn Creek Rd) 876 51 Hilltop Dr (n/o Browning St to Maraglia St) 835 45
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress Ave to n/o 3rd St) 711 29
W Cypress Ave (Market St to Park Marina Dr) 657 15
Railroad Ave (South St to Buenaventura Blvd) 651 10
Hartnell Ave (Goodwater Ave to Airport Rd) 618 7
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding Hilltop Apartments to St
Thomas Pkwy) 604 11
Hartnell Ave (Northwoods Way to Kenco Ave) 193 30
S Bonnyview Rd (S Market St to Churn Creek Rd) 163 25
Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix A: Collision Data.

Collisions on Caltrans Roadways
There were 1104 collisions reported to SWITRS at roadways under Caltrans jurisdiction between 2015 and 2019, including mainline collisions. As seen by the collision density map provided by TIMS (see Figure 13), the area where State Route 273 intersects State Route 299 has a high density of collisions.

This map excludes property damage only collisions. Caltrans does not currently have any planned safety improvements at this location.

Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 19
Figure 13 Collision Density on Caltrans Roads
Collisions Related to Challenge Areas

4.2.3.1 Pedestrians
There were one hundred and sixty-three (163) total pedestrian collisions on City roadways. The pedestrian location at the time of collision, along with corresponding severity, is shown in Figure 14.

There were nine (9) fatal and fifteen (15) severe injury collisions with pedestrians involved between 2015 and 2019.

Most pedestrians were crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection, but many were crossing not in a crosswalk. The top violation category for pedestrian collisions was pedestrian violation (44% of all pedestrian collisions). This category includes violations such as pedestrians failing to yield right of way to vehicles at areas without a marked crosswalk, crossing without a crosswalk at the mid-block of two adjacent signals, and walking on the wrong side of the road when no pedestrian facilities are provided outside of a business or residence district.

Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 20
Figure 14 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision
As seen in the collision density map (Figure 15), areas with high densities of pedestrian collisions include West Street at 11th Street, E Cypress Avenue near Beverly Drive, and Churn Creek Road at Hartnell Avenue.

Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 21
Figure 15 Density of Pedestrian Collisions

4.2.3.2 Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is categorized in collision data as inattention. Categories for inattention include cell phones (handheld or hands-free), electronic equipment, smoking, eating, children, animal, personal hygiene, and reading.

There were fourteen collisions due to distracted driving on City roadways between 2015 and 2019. This is one percent (1%) of all collisions on City roadways. Most of these collisions were rear end collisions and no distracted driving collisions resulted in fatal or severe injury. Figure 16 presents a breakdown of the types of inattention for the fourteen distracted driving collisions.

Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 22
Figure 16 Type of Inattention for Distracted Driving Collisions

4.2.3.3 Bicyclists
There was a total of one hundred and twenty-two (122) bicycle collisions for City roadways. The top violation categories for bicycle-related collisions, along with collision severity, are shown in Figure 17.

There were three (3) fatal and fifteen (15) severe injury collisions with bicyclists involved between 2015 and 2019. The primary collision type for bicycle collisions is broadside collisions. The top violation category for bicycle collisions was travelling on the wrong side of the road (34% of all bicycle collisions).

Figure 17 Top Violation Categories for Bicycle-Related Collisions As seen in the collision density map (Figure 18), areas with high densities of bicycle collisions include Hilltop Road at Browning Street and Bechelli Lane near Markwood Drive.

Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 23
Figure 18 Density of Bicycle Collisions

4.2.3.4 Intersections
One-thousand three-hundred and twenty (1320) collisions in the City of Redding between 2015 and 2019 were at intersections. This is fifty-six percent (56%) of all collisions on City roadways. As seen in Figure 19, the majority of these collisions were due to an unsafe speed violation, resulting in a rear end collision.

Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 24
Figure 19 Top Violation Categories for Intersection-Related Collisions

4.2.3.5 Impaired Driving
Seventeen percent (17%) of all City collisions between 2015 and 2019 were due to driving or biking under the influence of drugs or alcohol (DUI/BUI). Fifty-five percent of these collisions occurred during the weekend (Friday through Saturday). As shown in Figure 20, the top collision type due to DUI/BUI collisions is hit object.

Figure 20 Collision Types for DUI/BUI Collisions
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 25

5. PUBLIC OUTREACH

5.1 Public Website
A project website was created on the Social Pinpoint platform to inform the public about the LRSP and provide a platform for input. Figure 21 displays the homepage for the website found at lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding. The project website had Google Translate enabled that was able to translate the webpage in over 100 languages and detect the user’s browsers settings to automatically display the website in their language preference. In addition, the user could toggle the preferred language on the upper right corner of the webpage. Visitors to the page were invited to provide comments on an interactive project map and share their thoughts through a project survey. Comments from the interactive map and detailed results from the survey are included in Appendix B: Stakeholder and Public Input.

Figure 21 Public Website Home Page
Interactive Map
The interactive map feature on the website allowed the public to drag icons to a location within the City and leave a comment regarding driving, pedestrian, or bicycle suggestions at that location. Figure 22 Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 26
shows the interactive map feature from the website. Forty-four (44) comments were recorded as of June 23, 2021. Some of the public comments collected from the interactive map are as follows:
 Adding multi-use paths at various locations throughout the City o Oasis Road near Midland Drive
o Old Oregon Trail near Old 44 Drive
o Connecting Magnolia neighborhood to Airpark Drive and Gold Street o Along ACID canal
o S Bonnyview Road near S Market Street
o Buenaventura Boulevard between Placer Road and Starlight Boulevard  Improving quality/maintenance of bicycle facilities
o Placer Street near Buenaventura Street
o Near Juniper School
o Along bridge on E Cypress Avenue
o On western end of S Bonnyview Road
 Congestion at intersections
o Hartnell Avenue at Alta Mesa Drive
o E Cypress Avenue at I-5 Ramps
o Old Alturas Road at Victor Avenue
 Safety of pedestrian crossings
o Crossing Buenaventura Boulevard near Lakeside Drive

Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 27
Figure 22 Public Website Interactive Map
Public Survey
The City of Redding Public Survey asked eight questions relating to the LRSP. As of June 23, 2021, the survey received 12 responses. According to the survey, the primary safety issue for Redding is a lack of infrastructure (see Figure 23 for a graph with the responses).

Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 28
Figure 23 Public-Identified Roadway Issues
When asked about level of comfort with bicycling, three responses were “Enthused and Confident” and nine were “Interested but Concerned”. The majority of responses indicated they were were most comfortable with bicycling on a shared use path (see Figure 24).

Figure 24 Responses to “Which of the following bikeways would you feel comfortable using?” Additionally, three of twelve of responses were unfamiliar with ATP projects, four of twelve of responses were unfamiliar with HSIP planned projects, and two of twelve were interested in learning more about the ATP and HSIP projects. Some roadway issues identified through the survey are listed below.  Safety of crosswalks near Shasta Regional
o Suggestion to add a lighting system
 Speeding on Grandview Avenue
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 29
 High speed limits
 Signal timing downtown
 Safety for bicyclists at Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue  Crossing Buenaventura Avenue at Lakeside Drive
Figure 25 shows the responses to the question “Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?”. The majority of responses were “Maybe”. Some improvements that responses suggested to encourage increased use of alternate modes of travel include:
 Improved maintenance of roadways (fixing pot holes, cracking, etc.)  Improved transit schedules from Anderson to Redding
 Adding new bicycle facilities, specifically shared use paths  Improved travel times
 Improve and maintain bike lanes
 Less speeding, distracted driving, and impaired driving Figure 25 Responses to “Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?” Some additional suggestions collected by the survey are summarized below.  Develop bicycle facilities to connect Redding to nearby communities  Connect the Girvan neighborhood to downtown with bike paths Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 30
 Resurface roadways to increase bicycle comfort
 Additional pedestrian crossings and bike paths
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 31

6. IDENTIFY STRATEGIES
Through coordination and feedback from the City of Redding, LRSP stakeholder working group, and public outreach, safety projects and strategies were identified for the Local Road Safety Plan.

The LRSP will reference specific location engineering projects and systemic safety applications. In addition, safety strategies and projects that address the other E’s to include Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies will be discussed below.

6.1 Engineering Strategies
Locations to implement engineering strategies were determined through collision analysis and relative severity, public comments, recent safety improvements, and City feedback and recommendations.

Countermeasures were proposed for signalized intersections, two-way stop-controlled intersections, and roadway segments for roadways under City of Redding jurisdiction.

City Intersection Projects
Per the HSIP program, engineering countermeasures are available for grant funding. Per the most recent HSIP Cycle (Cycle 10) the approved countermeasures and crash reduction benefits were quantified in the HSIP analyzer. The recommended countermeasures for the intersections with the highest Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rankings are presented in Appendix D: Recommended Projects. Since the next HSIP Cycle 11 is in 2022, further safety analysis should be conducted at that time in refining the collision data and subsequent safety projects and Benefit to Cost Ratios (BCRs).

Countermeasures were evaluated and prioritized based on benefit to cost ratios as prescribed in Caltrans most recent Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM). Refer to Appendix D: Recommended Projects for the list of countermeasures from Caltrans LRSM. The benefit value of a crash is the expected reduction in crashes with the countermeasure and the associated costs with the crash. Caltrans has opted to use 5 years of observed crashes in estimating future expected crashes. A benefit in reduction of cost can include benefits derived from savings of societal cost (emergency response, medical cost, and property damage). Cost associated with a project is based on planning level estimates of construction cost, planning and environmental cost and costs associated with right-of-way and utilities.

The locations of the priority signalized intersections and their corresponding crash rates are listed in Table 5 below.

Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 32
Table 5 Priority Intersections and Crash Rates
Some proposed countermeasures at City signalized intersections are shown below.

The City currently has advance dilemma zone detection on many high-speed roadways approaches.

Some additional countermeasures to consider for signalized intersections are ADA improvements, installing bicycle boxes, and installing guide marks through the intersection for left turns.

Additionally, there were seven (7) two-way stop-controlled intersections that had fatalities in the past five years. Some potential systemic countermeasures for these intersections could include a change of traffic control (multiway stop (if warrants are met) or roundabout), improved signage and pavement markings, and bicycle and pedestrian enhancements. The two-way stop-controlled intersections with fatalities are listed below.

Intersection
Crash Rate
(crashes/million
entering vehicles)*
Average Crash
Rate for Similar
Facility**
Churn Creek Rd / Hartnell Ave 0.4265 0.24
South St / California St - 0.24
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli Ln 0.1613 0.24
Airport Rd / Preserve Blvd 0.1809 0.24
Butte St / Continental St 0.2300 0.24
Market St / Riverside Dr - 0.20
Hartnell Ave / Northwoods Way 0.0363 0.24
Churn Creek Rd / E Cypress Ave 0.4752 0.24
Victor Ave / Hartnell Ave 0.3742 0.24
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress Ave 0.3174 0.24
E Cypress Ave / Bechelli Ln 0.2977 0.24
** California statewide average crash rate from "2018 Crash Data on California State Highways", Caltrans, 2020.
* Rates highlighted in bold are higher than average crash rates for similar facilities
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 33
 Hartnell Ave / Shotwick Trail
 Buenaventura Blvd / Lakeside Dr
 Hartnell Ave / Middleton Ln
 Old Eureka Way / Walnut Ave
 Mountain Lakes Blvd / Beltline Rd
 Delta St / Santa Fe Ave
 Placer St / Railroad Ave
City Segment Analysis
Throughout the analysis period, there were 1044 collisions reported on City of Redding roadway segments (non-intersection related). A breakdown of roadway collisions on City streets are included in Appendix A: Collision Data. The priority segments that were determined through data analysis and stakeholder coordination and their corresponding crash rates are listed in Table 6 below.

Table 6 Priority Segments and Crash Rates
Proposed mitigation measures for roadway segments are shown below. Detailed countermeasures for each priority segment are shown in Appendix D: Recommended Projects.

Segment Facility Type
Crash Rate
(crashes/million
vehicle miles)*
Average Crash
Rate for Similar
Facility**
CHURN CREEK RD from PRESIDIO ST to S BONNYVIEW RD 4-lane undivided 0.5375 0.8072 E CYPRESS AVE from PARK MARINA DR to CHURN CREEK RD 6-lane undivided 0.7648 0.8072 HILLTOP DR from N/O BROWNING ST to MARAGLIA ST 4-lane undivided 0.4676 0.8072 BECHELLI LN from E CYPRESS AVE to N/O 3RD ST 4-lane undivided 1.5918 0.8072 W CYPRESS AVE from MARKET ST to PARK MARINA DR 6-lane divided 0.5404 0.8141 RAILROAD AVE from SOUTH ST to BUENAVENTURA BLVD 2-lane undivided 0.3758 1.7391 HARTNELL AVE from GOODWATER AVE to AIRPORT RD 2-lane undivided - 1.7391 HILLTOP DR from N/O REDDING HILLTOP APARTMENT to ST THOMAS PKWY 4-lane undivided 0.6606 0.8072 HARTNELL AVE from NORTHWOODS WAY to KENCO AVE 4-lane undivided 0.9143 0.8072 S BONNYVIEW RD from S MARKET ST to CHURN CREEK RD 4-lane divided 0.2157 0.8141 * Rates highlighted in bold are higher than average crash rates for similar facilities ** Shasta County average crash rate from "2018 Crash Data on California State Highways", Caltrans, 2020.

Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 34
Speed Mitigation

6.1.3.1 Traffic Calming
The collision analysis from the past five years indicated that the top violation category for the City of Redding was unsafe speed. The stakeholder working group meetings and public website also gathered many comments related to speeding concerns. One way to help mitigate speed is to implement traffic calming measures. Some examples of traffic calming devices that can be used in the City of Redding to mitigate speed at areas of concern are shown below.

Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 35

The City of Redding has a Traffic Calming Program in place where residents can apply for a speed table to be implemented in their neighborhood. This program is neighborhood driven and requires support from 67% of the affected residents for installation of the speed table(s).

6.1.3.2 Assembly Bill No. 43
Assembly Bill (AB 43) was signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 8, 2021. This bill will change several aspects of speed setting and enforcement in California with a goal to make roadways safer for all road users. The new law is set to go into effect by June 30, 2024 and allows agencies more flexibility with keeping the previous speed limit, allows business and residential districts to have 15 and 20 mph speed limits, and allows the agency to round down the proposed speed limit based on an engineering study due to a high presence of bicycles or pedestrians.

Systemic Safety Countermeasures
When selecting countermeasures, just focusing on locations with a current collision issues is a reactive approach to roadway safety planning. A reactive approach targets recent hot-spots and specific problems that are associated with these locations; as a result of this approach, locations with low traffic volumes but with similar safety issues as hot spot locations are not addressed. In order to mitigate collisions in a both a reactive and proactive approach, Caltrans’ Local Road Safety Manual suggests agencies utilize a comprehensive approach that includes systemic and hot spot location improvements in developing a safety plan.

Some systemic safety countermeasure options, per the LRSM, at signalized intersections and segments for the current high-risk roadway characteristics are shown in Table 7. These systemic countermeasures could be added to a series of signalized intersections and segments through our recommendation or City Chicanes (create an S-shaped travel way for
Speed Tables vehicles)
Traffic Circles Partial Road Closure
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 36
coordination. Some additional systemic countermeasures for bicycle and pedestrian improvements can include leading pedestrian intervals and accessible pedestrian push buttons (APS) and/or pedestrian countdown signals, green conflict markings for bike lanes, and enhanced crossings (e.g. high visibility crosswalks, median refuge areas, rectangular rapid flashing beacons at midblock locations, and pedestrian hybrid beacons (must met CA MUTCD warrants).

Table 7 Recommended Systemic Safety Countermeasures
For HSIP funding, the goal will be to balance the need to have a competitive BCR (i.e. last call minimum BCR was 3.5 but funding was awarded for a minimum BCR closer to 12) and maximizing as many locations as possible that can benefit from similar safety countermeasures. However, HSIP does have set asides that require no BCR and therefore a systemic approach of these projects can be identified as long they meet the funding requirement (e.g. HSIP Cycle 10 had set aside funding were as follows: $250K per agency available for pedestrian crossing enhancements, $1M per agency for guardrail upgrades, and $250K per agency for installing edgelines).

6.1.4.1 Leading Pedestrian Intervals
One potential systemic project for signalized intersections is installing leading pedestrian intervals for pedestrian and bicycle crossings. This countermeasure benefits both pedestrians and bicyclists by allowing them to enter intersections a few seconds earlier than vehicles. According to the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), this has been proven to reduce vehicle-pedestrian collisions by 60% and increase visibility for pedestrians and bicyclists when entering the intersection.

Redding currently has leading pedestrian intervals at the following six signalized intersections:
 Lake Boulevard and Tamarack Drive
 Lake Boulevard and Clay Street
 Lake Boulevard and Masonic Avenue
 Court Street at Tehama Street
 Placer Street at East Street
 Hartnell Avenue at Parkview Avenue
The City compiled a list of locations that could benefit from this countermeasure. The specific locations for the recommended leading pedestrian intervals are shown in Figure 26. If all 49 locations are compiled into a systemic HSIP application, the estimated benefit-to-cost ratio will be approximately 57. Additional collision data for these locations is in Appendix D: Recommended Projects.

Location
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures
S02 15% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Segments R26 30% Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs Signalized Intersections
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
8 1
7 9
6 5
4 3
2 45
41 40
24 23
20 13
22 31
21 25
18 19
16 17
15 37
36 35
38 39
43 44
34 42
49 33
32 30
29 28
27 26
48 12
11 10
14 46
47 FIGURE 26
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 08/03/2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\LPI Locations.mxd Print date: 04 Aug 2021 - 07:58
Legend
Location for
Proposed
Leading
Pedestrian
Interval
n School
City of Redding
City Limit

LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED

LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL

PROJECT

CITY OF

REDDING
ID Primary Road Secondary Road
1 Lake Blvd Hiatt Dr
2 Lake Blvd Oasis Rd
3 Lake Blvd Tamarack Dr
4 Lake Blvd Clay St
5 Lake Blvd North Point Dr
6 Lake Blvd Masonic Ave
7 Hilltop Dr Peppertree Ln
8 Placer St Pleasant St
9 Court St Tehama St
10 Court St Shasta St
11 Court St Placer St
12 Court St South St
13 Placer St Airpark Dr
14 Buenaventura Blvd Placer St
15 Butte St Continental St
16 Placer St Continental St
17 Placer St East St
18 Cypress Ave Civic Center Dr
19 Athens Ave Locust St
20 Hartnell Ave Cobblestone
21 Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave
22 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln
23 Bechelli Ln Blue Shield
24 S Bonnyview Rd Fire Hall 4
25 E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way
26 Churn Creek Rd Old Alturas Rd
27 Churn Creek Rd Presidio St
28 Churn Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln
29 Churn Creek Rd Industrial St
30 Churn Creek Rd Merchant St
31 Hartnell Ave Northw oods Way
32 Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln
33 Churn Creek Rd Loma Vista Dr
34 Shasta View Dr Hartnell Ave
35 Dana Dr Victor Ave
36 Dana Dr Bradford Way
37 Victor Ave E Cypress Ave
38 Old Alturas Rd Friendly Rd
39 Airport Rd Knighton Rd
40 Shasta View Dr Hemingw ay St
41 Shasta View Dr Tarmac Rd
42 Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr
43 Airport Rd Rancho Rd
44 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd
45 Airport Rd Shasta View Dr
46 Market St Riverside Dr
47 Lake Blvd Hilltop Dr
48 Hilltop Dr Brow ning St
49 Churn Creek Rd S Bonnyview Rd
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A) GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 38
Projects Suggested through Public Input
The interactive map tool on the public website for the plan gathered many suggestions from residents of the City for areas of improvement. These suggestions were summarized and are shown in Table 8 below.

Table 8 Projects Suggested through Public Input
Additional Safety Projects
A comprehensive approach to selecting countermeasure recognizes that not all safety issues can be addressed through infrastructure improvement. The comprehensive approach to safety involves the ‘5 E’s of traffic safety. Besides engineering safety countermeasures, it is important to recommend safety countermeasures to coincide with the other safety E’s.

Location Suggestion
E Cypress Ave bridge Restripe pavement markings
E Cypress Ave bridge
Placer St near Buenaventura Blvd
S Bonnyview Rd between S Market St and Sacramento River Old Oregon Trail between Viking Way and SR 44
Parallel to Almond Ave between Shasta St and Placer St
Parallel to Buenaventura Blvd along goat path between Placer St and Starlight neighborhood
Along ACID Canal between Radio Ln and N Bonnyview Rd
S Bonnyview Rd between S Market St and Sacramento River Old Oregon Trail, north of Akrich St
North side of Old Alturas Rd from Shasta View Dr to Browning St Buenaventura Blvd at Lakeside Dr Install enhanced pedestrian crossing Ellis St near Juniper School Improve K rail maintenance and appearance
Cedars Rd Continue bike lanes on S Bonnyview
Shasta St at Olive Ave Educate public about traffic circles Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam Rd Evaluate installation of traffic signal Shasta View Dr near Alden Ave
Benton Dr near Delta St
Benton Dr near Delta St
Old Alturas Bridge
Shasta View Dr from SR 44 and Hartnell Ave
Victor Ave from SR 44 and Cypress Ave
Rancho Rd
Churn Creek Rd from I-5 to Victor Ave
Churn Creek Rd at Rancho Rd Evaluate visibility and speed countermeasures
Goodwater Ave
Freeman Way
Freebridge St at Smile Pl
Tehama St at Oregon St
Eureka Way at Almond Ave Install safety lighting
California St at Gold St Evaluate left turn movements
Market St at Gold St Evaluate right turn movements
Old Alturas Rd at Victor Ave Evaluate installation of roundabout Evaluate installation of stop signs
Evaluate traffic calming measures
Install multiuse path
Sweep/maintain bike lanes
Install sidewalk
Install bike lanes
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 39

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies
Education
Education strategies are listed below.
 Campaign to prevent distracted driving and walking
 Safe route to school maps and outreach at schools
 Social media blasts with quick education tool for all users  Partner with existing agencies for public education campaigns Emerging Technologies
Possible emerging technologies strategies are listed below.  ITS infrastructure, web/mobile application (apps) and smart cities practices  Crash warning system
 Communication with traffic signals
 Changeable message signs
 Automatic bicycle/pedestrian counters
 Improving signal operation
o This helps increase traffic flow and can help with safety by decreasing delay, greenhouse gas emissions, crashes, etc.

Enforcement
Enforcement strategies are listed below.
 Targeted speed enforcement
o Focus on areas of concern for residents based on public feedback  DUI saturation patrols
 Increasing number of traffic enforcement officers
 Distracted driving enforcement
Emergency Response
Emergency response strategies are suggested below.
 Emergency signal installation
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 40
 Ability to administer life saving measures on-site of a collision  Emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections  Improvements to roadways to increase access and potentially shorten response times Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 41

7. PRIORITIZE & INCORPORATE STRATEGIES
In evaluating how to implement safety projects, prioritized lists of projects are shown in the tables below.

The City of Redding can look for opportunities to incorporate safety enhancements with the Capital Improvement Program. However, it is noted that funding is very limited and typically used from roadway paving. Additional funding opportunities can come through grant funding to include HSIP, ATP, and CMAQ.

Table 9 contains a prioritized list of the proposed intersection projects on City roadways based on their respective benefits. Table 10 shows a prioritized list of the proposed segment projects for City roadway segments based on expected benefits. The lowest fundable Benefit-to-Cost ratio for HSIP Cycle 10 was

12. To help show the competitiveness of the proposed projects, the tables also display the maximum project cost for a benefit-to-cost ratio of 10.

Low-cost, systemic countermeasures are preferred by Caltrans in the HSIP process.

Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 42
Table 9 Priority of City Intersection Projects
Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Max Project Cost
for B/C Ratio of 10
Total Expected
Benefit
Total Estimated
Project Cost**HSIP Funding
Reimbursement
Ratio*
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Systemic (49
locations****) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) $2,075,100 $ 20,751,000 $$ 100% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) - - - - Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) - - - - Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Increase DUI enforcement
Consolidate driveways
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Bicycle education about riding at night and rules of the road - - - - Butte St / Continental
St None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) - - - - Market St / Riverside
Dr Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) $ 159,000 $ 1,590,000 $ 100% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number $ 47,700 $ 477,001 $ 100%
Increase DUI enforcement - - - -
* Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 50% Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% ** $ = Estimated cost below $250,000
$$ = Estimated cost around $250,000 to $1,000,000
$$$ = Estimated cost above $1,000,000
***Locations for systemic mitigations: Churn Creek Rd/Hartnell Ave, South St/California St, Hartnell Ave/Bechelli Ln, Airport Rd/Preserve Blvd, Hartnell Ave/Northwoods Way, Churn Creek Rd/E Cypress Ave, Victor Ave/Hartnell Ave, Hilltop Dr/E Cypress Ave, E Cypress Ave/Bechelli Ln ****See Figure 26 for proposed locations
--
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
$ 302,756 $ 3,027,557 $ 50%
-
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli
Ln
$ 403,061 $ 4,030,610 $$ 90%
South St / California St $ 522,218 $ 5,222,178
Systemic (9
locations***) $1,584,138 $ 15,841,375 $$ 50%
Victor Ave / Hartnell
Ave $ 215,421
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave $ 211,949 $ 2,119,490 $
Airport Rd / Preserve
Blvd
$ 203,324 $ 2,033,242 $$
$ 2,154,205 $
E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln $ 63,192 $ 631,924 $ 50%
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress
Ave $ 117,166 $ 1,171,664 $ 50%
$ 90%
50%
100%
50%
-
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 42
Table 9 Priority of City Intersection Projects
Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Max Project Cost
for B/C Ratio of 10
Total Expected
Benefit
Total Estimated
Project Cost**HSIP Funding
Reimbursement
Ratio*
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Systemic (49
locations****) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) $2,075,100 $ 20,751,000 $$ 100% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) - - - - Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) - - - - Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Increase DUI enforcement
Consolidate driveways
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Bicycle education about riding at night and rules of the road - - - - Butte St / Continental
St None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) - - - - Market St / Riverside
Dr Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) $ 159,000 $ 1,590,000 $ 100% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number $ 47,700 $ 477,001 $ 100%
Increase DUI enforcement - - - -
* Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 50% Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% ** $ = Estimated cost below $250,000
$$ = Estimated cost around $250,000 to $1,000,000
$$$ = Estimated cost above $1,000,000
***Locations for systemic mitigations: Churn Creek Rd/Hartnell Ave, South St/California St, Hartnell Ave/Bechelli Ln, Airport Rd/Preserve Blvd, Hartnell Ave/Northwoods Way, Churn Creek Rd/E Cypress Ave, Victor Ave/Hartnell Ave, Hilltop Dr/E Cypress Ave, E Cypress Ave/Bechelli Ln ****See Figure 26 for proposed locations
--
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
$ 302,756 $ 3,027,557 $ 50%
-
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli
Ln
$ 403,061 $ 4,030,610 $$ 90%
South St / California St $ 522,218 $ 5,222,178
Systemic (9
locations***) $1,584,138 $ 15,841,375 $$ 50%
Victor Ave / Hartnell
Ave $ 215,421
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave $ 211,949 $ 2,119,490 $
Airport Rd / Preserve
Blvd
$ 203,324 $ 2,033,242 $$
$ 2,154,205 $
E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln $ 63,192 $ 631,924 $ 50%
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress
Ave $ 117,166 $ 1,171,664 $ 50%
$ 90%
50%
100%
50%
-
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 43
Table 10 Priority of City Segment Projects
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Max Project Cost
for B/C Ratio of 10
Total Expected
Benefit
Total Estimated
Project Cost**HSIP Funding
Reimbursement
Ratio*
Add segment lighting (East of I-5 Interchange)
Install raised median (Between Hilltop Dr and Churn Creek Rd) Install bike lanes/Install separated bike lanes
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points - - - - Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways - - - - Install raised median (Between Dana Dr and Browning Dr) Install edge-lines and centerlines (between Ross/Big-Lots Driveway and Margalia St) Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk to guide pedestrians to the enhanced crosswalk with

RRFB - - - -
Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Install multiuse path/ sharrow on eastbound approach to the intersection of W Cypress Ave/ Market St
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs $ 910,518 $ 9,105,180 $ 100% Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways - - - - Add Segment Lighting
Install curve advance warning signs
Increase DUI enforcement - - - -
Add Segment Lighting
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points - - - - Install raised median (on the approaches to Hartnell Ave) $ 620,150 $ 6,201,500 $ 90% Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points - - - - Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs $ 431,490 $ 4,314,901 $ 100% S Bonnyview Rd (S
Market St to Churn
Creek Rd)
Install Separated Bike Lanes $ 53,622 $ 536,220 $$ 90%
* Install raised median; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90%
Install bike lanes; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90%
Install Separated Bike Lanes; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% ** $ = Estimated cost below $250,000
$$ = Estimated cost around $250,000 to $1,000,000
$$$ = Estimated cost above $1,000,000
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress
Ave to n/o 3rd St)
Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) $1,268,251 $ 12,682,508 $$$ 90%
- - - -
W Cypress Ave (Market
St to Park Marina Dr)
$ 902,440 $ 9,024,397 90%
Churn Creek Rd
(Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o
Browning St to
Maraglia St)
$1,763,889 $ 17,638,888 $$ 90%
90%
100%
E Cypress Ave (Park
Marina Dr to Churn
Creek Rd)
$2,271,687 $ 22,716,865
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding
Hilltop Apartments to
St Thomas Pkwy)
$ 820,648 $ 8,206,483 $$$
Hartnell Ave
(Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd)
$ 877,729 $ 8,777,285 $$
$$
$$$ 90%
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 44

8. EVALUATION PROCESS
To evaluate the success of this plan, yearly collision analysis, along with requests for public feedback, can take place and be compared to the established goals.

Goal: Reduce the potential for fatal and severe injury collisions citywide o Measure of Success: This can be achieved by smaller reductions of 1 fatal or severe injury (FSI) collision reduction per year.

Goal: Create a safe, livable, and welcoming community by developing a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s transportation and roadway safety needs o Measure of Success: If this goal is successful, residents will express an increased feeling of safety while using Redding’s transportation systems and the number and severity of collisions each year will decrease.

Goal: Improve safety around schools
o Measure of Success: Results of public feedback shows that there are areas where pedestrian access and safety can be improved around schools in the City of Redding. An evaluation of the improvements of multimodal transportation infrastructure around schools will capture effectiveness of this goal.

Goal: Reduce speeding collisions through engineering, enforcement, and education strategies o Measure of Success: A reduction in collisions with “Unsafe Speed” violations after implementing engineering, enforcement, and education strategies will determine if this goal is met.

Goal: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s non-motorized transportation infrastructure
o Measure of Success: Public feedback results show that there are areas where pedestrian and bicycle accessibility can be improved or installed. Improvements and installations of non-motorized transportation infrastructure will capture this goal.

Goal: Improve the health and vitality of our community by working with community safety partners to create a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s needs o Measure of Success: Community stakeholders will have increased participation in conversations about safety improvements in the City of Redding.

Goal: Reduce rear end collisions citywide by implementing speed management strategies Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 45
o Measure of Success: This goal will be effective if there is a decrease in “Unsafe Speed” collisions after implementing speed management strategies outlined in this plan.

Goal: Prioritize improvements that affect conditions/safety outcomes for identified disadvantaged populations
o Measure of Success: An increase in the projects implemented in disadvantaged populations would achieve this goal. See Figure 27 for the locations for recommended projects, in relation to the locations of low resource neighborhoods in Redding.

Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application ³
&
&
&
³ ³
³
³
³
& ³
& ³
³
& ³ ³ &
044D
140B
039E
114B
039B
114A
122B 122D
124B
039E
77 76
49 35
373 378
371
370
341
305
291
237 260
210
171
133
115 130
FIGURE 27
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 05/05/2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\Disadvantaged Communities.mxd
Print date: 04 Aug 2021 - 08:01
Legend
³
Priority
Intersection
(Signalized)
&
Priority
Intersection
(Two-Way Stop
Controlled)
Priority
Segment
Low Resource
Neighborhood
City of Redding
City Limit

LOW RESOURCE NEIGHBORHOODS

AND PRIORITY LOCATIONS

IN REDDING

CITY OF

REDDING
SEGMENT_ID STREET FROM TO
039B HILLTOP DR N/O HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY
039E HILLTOP DR N/O BROWNING ST MARAGLIA ST
044D CHURN CREEK RD PRESIDIO ST DANA DR
114A W CYPRESS AVE MARKET ST PARK MARINA DR
114B E CYPRESS AVE PARK MARINA DR CHURN CREEK RD
122B HARTNELL AVE NORTHWOODS WAY KENCO AVE
122D HARTNELL AVE GOODWATER AVE AIRPORT RD
124B BECHELLI LN E CYPRESS AVE N/O 3RD ST
140B RAILROAD AVE SOUTH ST BUENAVENTURA BLVD
Intx_ID NS_Road EW_Road
35 Market St Riverside Dr
49 Mountain Lakes Blvd Beltline Rd
76 Delta St Santa Fe Ave
77 Buenaventura Blvd Lakeside Dr
115 Hilltop Dr E Cypress Ave
130 Churn Creek Rd E Cypress Ave
133 Churn Creek Rd Hartnell Ave
171 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd
210 Victor Ave Hartnell Ave
237 Old Eureka Way Walnut Ave
260 Butte St Continental St
291 Placer St Railroad Ave
305 South St California St
341 E Cypress Ave Bechelli Ln
370 Hartnell Ave Shotw ick Trl
371 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln
373 Hartnell Ave Northw oods Way
378 Hartnell Ave Middleton Ln
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A) GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 47

9. NEXT STEPS
The City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan was adopted by City Council on February 15, 2022. This safety plan will be a living document and will guide the City’s roadway safety needs for the next five years.

It will be updated as needed and the goals will be monitored.

Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 48

10. REFERENCES
Recent/Upcoming Projects
 “Shasta County Projects”, Caltrans, District 2.
 “Oasis Road Specific Plan: Final Master Environmental Impact Report”, RBF Consulting, April 2006.  “Administrative Draft EIR: Traffic Impact Analysis”, City of Redding, Oasis Specific Plan. KimleyHorn and Associates, Inc., June 2005.  “Girvan Road Railroad Crossing Improvements and South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail Project”, Dokken Engineering, November 2020.
 “West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, May 2020.
 “Trinity Street Bikeway Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, November 2020.  “Shasta Street R.R. Crossing Improvements Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2020.
 “Systemic Protected Left Turn Project”, Application Form for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10. City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2020.  “Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project”, Application Form for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10. City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2020.  “Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements”, Application Form for Cycle 9 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). City of Redding, Public Works Department, August 2018.  “Airport Road Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, April 2019.  “Bechelli Lane & Loma Vista Active Transportation Corridor Improvements”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2016.  “Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, March 2020.
 “Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2020.
 “Placer Street Improvements (ATP)”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, May 2016.  “Quartz Hill Road Improvements”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, January 2018.  “Churn Creek Rd & Maraglia St Safety Improvements Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, September 2020.
 “California Street Bikeway”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, December 2018.
 “Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, July 2020.  “Victor Ave & E Cypress Ave Active Transportation Project”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, July 2020.

Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 49
 Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, “SR-273 Multimodal Corridor Plan”, https://www.srta.ca.gov/353/SR-273-Multimodal-Corridor-Plan Traffic Data
 City of Redding Collision Data, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 2015-2019.  City of Redding Collision Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2015-2019.  “2018 Crash Data on California State Highways”, Caltrans, October 2020.

Manuals/Articles
 “Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa12017/.  2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.
 “Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020
 “Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.
 “California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.  “Designing for All Ages & Abilities: Contextual Guidance for High-Comfort Bicycle Facilities”, National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), December 2017.  Geller, Rodger. “Four Types of Cyclists”, Portland Office of Transportation, 2009.  “2000-2020 General Plan”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2000, https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=5513.  “California Statewide Collision Overview”, Caltrans, https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/safety-programs/documents/shsp/shsp-ca-datafactsheets_a11y.pdf.  “Local and Rural Road Safety Briefing Sheets: Local Road Safety Plans,” Federal Highway Administration, November 2014.
 “Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool,” Federal Highway Administration, 2013.

Websites
 California Department of Transportation, “Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/safety-programs/shsp.
 California Department of Transportation, “Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-stateprograms/highway-safety-improvement-program/local-roadway-safety-plans.  California Department of Transportation, “HSIP Cycle 10”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/apply-now.

Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 50
 City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding.  City of Redding, “Traffic Calming”,
https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showpublisheddocument/24813/637438934889970000.  National Association of City Transportation Officials, “Urban Street Design Guide”, https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/intersection-design-elements/trafficsignals/leading-pedestrian-interval/.

Surveys
 Local Road Safety Plan Project Survey, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding.

Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 51
Kathryn Kleinschmidt
[email protected]
805.305.5868
Emily Darke
[email protected]
916.865.5309
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Appendix
A– Collision Data
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application

COLLISIONS BY YEAR
By Severity
By Collision Type
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Collisions at Selected Intersections
Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
1 Lake Blvd Oasis Rd 1 1 2 1 21 1 2 1 19 2 42 Oasis Rd Vigil Ct 11 1 61 13 Oasis Rd Beltline Rd 11 1 61 14 Oasis Rd Daut Rd 11 1 30 1 15 Oasis Rd Oak Leaf Ln 1 11 30 1 16 Oasis Rd Sandstone Dr 11 1 10 17 Oasis Rd Twin View Blvd 2 3 1 1 41 3 2 1 41 5 68 Oasis Rd Old Oregon Trl 1 2 1 1 21 1 11 1 24 3 49 Old Oregon Trl Paso Robles Ave 1 1 2 11 17 2 2 10 Old Oregon Trl Frontier Rd 11 1 30 1 111 Lake Blvd Wilmington Way 1 11 1 61 112 Lake Blvd Keswick Dam Rd 1 3 3 151 11 2 3 32 4 713 Lake Blvd Magnums Way 11 1 30 1 114 Lake Blvd Santa Rosa Way 11 1 1 1 1 1 17 2 215 Lake Blvd Tamarack Dr 3 1 11 1 11 1 33 3 316 Lake Blvd St Nicholas Ave 2 2 31 111 1 1 34 4 417 Lake Blvd St Mark St 11 1 10 118 Lake Blvd Clay St 1 3 13 121 29 4 419 Lake Blvd North Point Dr 11 3 1 13 112 1 1 59 5 520 Lake Blvd Masonic Ave 1 6 1 1 331 2321 2 48 7 821 Lake Blvd N Market St 2 2 4 1 34 2222 38 4 822 Lake Blvd Hilltop Dr 12 4 1 132 1 11123 1 77 7 823 Lake Blvd Erickson Way 2 11 11 1 22 2 224 Lake Blvd Black Marble Way 2 3 1 51 11 2 2 41 5 625 Lake Blvd Churn Creek Rd 11 1 10 126 Twin View Blvd Oasis Ct 11 1 61 127 Twin View Blvd Caterpillar Rd 11 2 2 12 1 228 Twin View Blvd Midway Dr 11 1 61 129 Twin View Blvd N Market St 1 2 3 12 23 3 330 North Point Dr Redwood Blvd 11 1 10 131 N Market St Caterpillar Rd 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 232 N Market St Benton Dr 2 2 4 5 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 5 38 4 833 N Market St Arboretum Dr 11 1 61 134 N Market St Quartz Hill Rd 2 2 11 12 2 235 Market St Riverside Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 551 2 336 Market St Trinity St 12 1 1 3 2 1 112 1 59 4 537 Market St Eureka Way 2 21 2 31 14 2 438 Market St Shasta St 1 3 121 13 14 1 439 Market St Tehama St 1 1 4 114 32 1 21 2 640 Market St Placer St 11 1 61 141 Market St South St 2 2 1 1 12 1 31 1 35 4 542 Market St Lincoln St 11 1 10 143 S Market St California St 1 21 1 1 1 2 1 81 3 Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
44 S Market St Fell St 11 1 61 145 S Market St Grange St 11 1 61 146 S Market St Sutter St 11 1 10 147 S Market St Wyndham Ln 1 1 11 111 17 2 248 S Market St S Bonnyview Rd 3 11 1 1 2 30 349 Mountain Lakes Blvd Beltline Rd 11 1 544 1 150 Mountain Lakes Blvd Charles Dr 1 1 11 11 1 151 White River Dr Beltline Rd 11 1 10 152 White River Dr Jaxon Way 11 1 10 153 Wright Dr Mountain Shadows Blvd 1 11 1 11 1 154 Mountain Shadows Blvd Alder St 11 1 10 155 Midway Dr Ridge Rd 11 1 10 156 Boulder Creek Dr Boulder Creek Ct 11 1 10 157 Black Marble Way Boulder Dr 21 1 1 1 20 258 Boulder Dr Rhyonite Dr 11 1 10 159 Redwood Blvd Butternut Ln 11 2 1 1 12 1 260 Ridgewood Rd Rugby Hill Dr 11 1 10 161 Collyer Dr Hawley Rd 11 1 61 162 Collyer Dr Ridgewood Rd 1 1 1 1 11 71 263 Country Oak Dr Mica Ct 11 1 10 164 College View Dr Churn Creek Rd 1 1 1 12 3 18 2 365 College View Dr Tidmore Ln 11 1 11 1 166 College View Dr Shasta View Dr 1 3 1 3 1111 91 467 Quartz Hill Rd River Ridge Dr 11 1 1 2 71 268 Quartz Hill Rd Mount Bonnington Dr 11 1 61 169 Quartz Hill Rd Snow Ln 11 1 11 1 170 Quartz Hill Rd Benton Dr 1 3 111 1 111 1 91 471 Quartz Hill Rd Rio Dr 11 1 10 172 Snow Ln Lake Redding Dr 11 1 30 173 Benton Dr Delta St 11 1 10 174 Benton Dr Barbara Rd 11 1 10 175 Benton Dr Loma St 11 2 2 71 276 Delta St Santa Fe Ave 1 11 544 1 177 Buenaventura Blvd Lakeside Dr 1 1 1 1 11 550 2 278 Buenaventura Blvd Westgate Dr 11 1 61 179 Buenaventura Blvd Placer St 1 2 12 1 1 1 81 380 Buenaventura Blvd Teton Dr 11 1 10 181 Buenaventura Blvd Summit Dr 11 1 1 2 17 2 282 Buenaventura Blvd Railroad Ave 1 2 1 21 1 2 121 24 3 483 N Court St Middle Creek Rd 11 1 30 1 184 N Court St 11th St 1 1 11 11 71 285 Court St Euerka Way 2 1 3 12 13 2 386 Court St Shasta St 3 2 2 6 1 112 32 47 5 787 Court St Tehama St 3 2 3 1 5 2 2 214 1 48 5 888 Court St Butte St 22 2 20 2 Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
89 Court St Yuba St 1 11 1 1 2 71 290 Court St Placer St 12 6 1 221 2 213131 1 88 9 991 Court St Sacramento St 21 3 2 1 13 2 392 Court St South St 1 2 1 2 11 1 81 393 Court St Gold St 2 2 1 14 31 1 35 4 594 Court St Terrace St 111 3 3 18 2 395 Court St Sonoma St 1 11 1 61 196 Court St Schley Ave 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 297 Court St Rosealine Ave 1 1 1 1 1 11 71 298 Hilltop Dr Ridgecrest Trl 11 1 61 199 Hilltop Dr Peppertree Ln 2 11 1 1 20 2 100 Hilltop Dr Mercedes Ln 11 1 61 1101 Hilltop Dr St Thomas Pkwy 1 2 12 1 11 13 1 3102 Hilltop Dr Sandpoint Dr 11 1 10 1103 Hilltop Dr Palisades Ave 2 2 3 52 14 2 37 4 7104 Hilltop Dr I-5 11 1 61 1105 Hilltop Dr Browning St 1 4 5 4 1 8 3 11 1 2 3 2 4 2 3 108 10 14106 Hilltop Dr Rockaway Dr 11 2 11 71 2107 Hilltop Dr E Palisades Ave 11 1 61 1108 Hilltop Dr Dana Dr 11 1 5 1331 1 2 11 4 52 3 8109 Hilltop Dr Presidio St 1 2 1 1 3 12 1 24 3 4110 Hilltop Dr Mistletoe Ln 11 1 10 1111 Hilltop Dr Azalea Ave 11 1 11 1 1112 Hilltop Dr Industrial St 1 5 1221 11 3 2 60 6 6113 Hilltop Dr Commerce St 11 1 61 1114 Hilltop Dr Grove St 1 4 1 123 1 12 2 36 5 6115 Hilltop Dr E Cypress Ave 6 9 7 2 3 11 3 3 1 4 4 3 6 5 127 15 22116 Hilltop Dr Maraglia St 11 1 10 1117 Churn Creek Rd Golden Gate Trl 11 1 11 1 1118 Churn Creek Rd Palacio Dr 1 11 1 30 1 1119 Churn Creek Rd Bodenhamer Blvd 11 2 4 22 53 4 4120 Churn Creek Rd Whistling Dr 2 1 1 1111 2 2 29 3 4121 Churn Creek Rd Browning St 2 1 11 3 2 2 29 3 4122 Churn Creek Rd Lancers Ln 11 2 1 1 41 2 2123 Churn Creek Rd Old Alturas Rd 13 3 1 4 2 2 132 1 81 7 7124 Churn Creek Rd Dana Dr 5 7 7 2348 11346 5 104 12 19125 Churn Creek Rd Presidio St 4 2 1 2 2 11 1 2 1 1 1 1 26 4 6126 Churn Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln 1 5 2 224 132 3 43 6 8127 Churn Creek Rd Industrial St 2 11 1 1 20 2128 Churn Creek Rd Merchant St 1 5 2 152 1 1121 3 43 6 8129 Churn Creek Rd Wall St 4 1 1 22 311 25 4 5130 Churn Creek Rd E Cypress Ave 8 12 9 3 2 6 12 2 2 1 1 1 6 8 7 5 3 169 20 29131 Churn Creek Rd Maraglia St 12 2 1 1 3 23 3 3132 Churn Creek Rd Parsons Dr 2 2 1 1111 1 1 2 2 35 4 5133 Churn Creek Rd Hartnell Ave 2 3 15 12 1 2 21 4 1 2 1 2 1 8 5 5 9 5 1223 20 32 Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
134 Churn Creek Rd Bond St 1 11 1 1 1 71 2135 Churn Creek Rd Le Brun Ln 1 21 2 2 1 81 3136 Churn Creek Rd Del Sol Pl 2 1 21 1121 23 2 3137 Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2138 Churn Creek Rd Camino Ct 11 1 1 1 1 71 2139 Churn Creek Rd Echo Rd 4 211 12 1 40 4140 Churn Creek Rd Harpole Rd 2 11 1 1 2 2 1 13 2 3141 Churn Creek Rd De Moll Dr 1 11 1 1 1 71 2142 Churn Creek Rd Loma Vista Dr 3 2 122 211 1 20 3 5143 Churn Creek Rd Denton Way 1 1 11 11 1 1144 Churn Creek Rd Arizona St 11 1 61 1145 Churn Creek Rd Hillmonte Dr 11 1 10 1146 Churn Creek Rd S Bonnyview Rd 1 4 5 1342 11341 1 59 5 10147 Churn Creek Rd Hartmey Ln 11 1 10 1148 Churn Creek Rd Victor Ave 1 1 13 2 1 37 2 3149 Churn Creek Rd Rancho Rd 1 1 3 1 1 21 1 1 3 20 2 5150 Shasta View Dr Palacio Dr 1 11 11 1 1151 Shasta View Dr Inspiration Pl 3 3 11 1 30 3152 Shasta View Dr Old Alturas Rd 5 2 3 3 24 1 4131 1 70 7 10153 Shasta View Dr Atrium Way 1 2 11 1 11 111 23 3 3154 Shasta View Dr Viking Way 11 1 61 1155 Shasta View Dr Goodwater Ave 2 1 1 1 1 111 13 2 3156 Shasta View Dr Kerry Ave 2 2 11 20 2157 Shasta View Dr Christian Ave 11 2 1 1 17 2 2158 Shasta View Dr Wilson Ave 1 3 22 111 1 48 4 4159 Shasta View Dr Hawn Ave 1 1 1 2 1 1 11 37 2 3160 Shasta View Dr Hartnell Ave 1 1 4 1 22 231 21 2 6161 Shasta View Dr Alden Ave 1 1 11 1 1 71 2162 Shasta View Dr Leonard St 1 21 2 2 1 13 1 3163 Shasta View Dr Saturn Skwy 11 1 10 1164 Shasta View Dr Galaxy Way 11 1 61 1165 Shasta View Dr Western Oak Dr 1 11 1 11 1 1166 Shasta View Dr Rancho Rd 1 3 22 2 1 1 91 4167 Old Oregon Trl Viking Way 1 1 11 11 1 1168 Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2169 Old Oregon Trl Airport Rd 12 3 1 2 23 3 3170 Old Oregon Trl Rancho Rd 11 1 11 1 1171 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd 1 1 1 1 22 121 1 562 3 4172 Airport Rd Rancho Rd 11 1 2 31 1 2173 Airport Rd Electro Way 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2174 Airport Rd Knighton Rd 3 1 121 111 1 19 3 4175 Airport Rd Meadow View Dr 1 2 1 2 1 21 23 3 3176 Airport Rd Fig Tree Ln 1 2 1 11 111 81 3177 Airport Rd Marvel Ln 11 1 30 1 1178 Airport Rd Skyway St 11 1 10 1 Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
179 Airport Rd Lassen View Ln 11 1 61 1180 Airport Rd Terry Ln 1 1 11 30 1 1181 Yolla Bolly Trl Chaos Walk 11 1 10 1182 Fountain Cir Olympic St 11 1 10 1183 Fountain Cir Richland Way 11 1 11 1 1184 Whistling Dr Springer Dr 1 1 11 1 1 71 2185 Bobwhite Way Grouse Dr 11 1 10 1186 Browning St Mission de Oro Dr 1 11 1 61 1187 Browning St Canby Rd 42 1 1 3 1 40 4188 Browning St Lancers Ln 1 2 12 1 1 1 13 1 3189 Browning St Friendly Rd 2 1 3 1 11 13 2 3190 Browning St Old Alturas Rd 11 1 10 1191 Old Alturas Rd Canby Rd 3 1 1 11 1 1 1 18 3 3192 Old Alturas Rd Friendly Rd 11 1 1 1 1 41 2 2193 Old Alturas Rd Bradford Way 15 2 1 7 412 1 97 8 8194 Old Alturas Rd Victor Ave 1 2 1 1 1 111 23 3 3195 Old Alturas Rd Arroyo Manor Dr 1 1 10 1196 Old Alturas Rd Lema Rd 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 18 2 3197 Old Alturas Rd Modoc Ln 1 11 11 1 1198 Dana Dr Mt Shasta Mall 2 2 1111 3 1 14 2 4199 Dana Dr Friendly Rd 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 37 2 3200 Dana Dr Bradford Way 21 1 1 1 20 2201 Dana Dr Victor Ave 11 1 61 1202 Victor Ave Victor Ave 11 1 61 1203 Victor Ave Aspin Ave 2 3 5 1111 1 15 2 5204 Victor Ave SR 44 WB Ramps 11 1 61 1205 Victor Ave SR 44 EB Ramps 11 1 10 1206 Victor Ave Mistletoe Ln 3 5 1 4 2 2121 2 23 3 8207 Victor Ave Derby Ln 11 1 11 1 1208 Victor Ave Cascade Ln 11 2 1 1 71 2209 Victor Ave E Cypress Ave 322 6 1 3 22 47 5 7210 Victor Ave Hartnell Ave 1 6 8 7 4 1 10 5 2 2 2 5 3 6 4 4 151 15 22211 Victor Ave Bramble Pl 3 11 1 11 1 30 3212 Victor Ave Marlene Ave 1 1 11 11 31 1 2213 Victor Ave Vega St 11 1 11 1 1214 Victor Ave Galaxy Way 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 21 2 2 3 51 3 7215 Victor Ave El Vista St 11 1 10 1216 Victor Ave Alta Saga Dr 11 1 61 1217 Sierra Vista Dr Hallmark Dr 11 1 10 1218 Sunset Dr Red Bud Dr 1 1 11 11 1 1219 Royal Oaks Dr Scenic Dr 11 1 10 1220 Overhill Dr Pioneer Dr 11 1 10 1221 Eureka Way Overhill Dr 1 1 11 1 1 71 2222 Euerka Way Whiskeytown Ct 1 11 61 1223 Eureka Way Almond Ave 11 1 61 1 Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
224 Eureka Way Walnut Ave 11 1 61 1225 Eureka Way Orange Ave 11 1 1 10 1226 Eureka Way Rose Ave 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2227 Eureka Way West St 11 1 10 1228 Eureka Way California St 3 11 1 1 2 1 18 3 3229 Eureka Way Pine St 3 3 1 11 30 3230 Eureka Way Continental St 1 3 22 112 91 4231 West St 10th St 11 1 61 1232 West St 11th St 3 2 21 1 1 4 221 45 5 5233 Trinity St Center St 11 1 10 1234 Trinity St Pine St 2 11 1 1 20 2235 Foothill Blvd Las Animas Dr 11 1 10 1236 Monte Bello Dr Las Animas Dr 11 1 10 1237 Old Eureka Way Walnut Ave 1 1 1 1 11 545 1 2238 Monte Bello Dr Manzanita Hills Ave 11 1 10 1239 North St Olive Ave 11 1 10 1240 Shasta St Lombard Trl 1 11 1 11 1 1241 Shasta St Almond Ave 11 1 61 1242 Shasta St Olive Ave 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2243 Shasta St Orange Ave 1 2 2 1 1 11 1 23 3 3244 Shasta St Magnolia Ave 11 1 10 1245 Shasta St Willis St 1 21 1 1 1 2 81 3246 Shasta St West St 1 1 1 1 1 11 71 2247 Shasta St Oregon St 11 1 61 1248 Shasta St Center St 1 11 1 61 1249 Shasta St California St 1 2 111 11 1 81 3250 Shasta St Pine St 2 5 2 1 7 1 11 43 2 54 7 9251 Shasta St East St 3 4 321 1 1 214 22 3 7252 Auditorium Dr Sundial Bridge Dr 11 1 11 1 1253 Tehama St Oregon St 1 8 1 8 21 3 3 14 1 9254 Tehama St California St 1 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2255 Tehama St Pine St 14 5 1 461 5311 1 105 10 11256 Tehama St East St 5 1 213 1 222 31 5 6257 Butte St Magnolia Ave 11 1 10 1258 Butte St West St 2 1 1 11 20 2259 Butte St East St 1 2 2 21 2 2 1 12 1 44 3 5260 Butte St Continental St 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 12211 562 3 4261 Butte St Sequoia St 11 1 10 1262 Butte St Sundial Bridge Dr 11 1 10 1263 Park Marina Dr Athens Ave 1 2 21 2 1 81 3264 Park Marina Dr Olympus Ave 11 1 11 1 1265 Park Marina Dr South St 21 1 2 2 1 28 3 3266 Park Marina Dr Washington Ave 11 1 10 1267 Park Marina Dr Locust St 11 1 61 1268 Yuba St Railroad Ave 11 1 61 1 Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
269 Yuba St California St 11 1 10 1270 Yuba St Pine St 32 4 1 1 1 3 1 20 3 5271 Yuba St East St 1 11 1 61 1272 Yuba St Liberty St 1 11 1 61 1273 Tralee Ln Tralee Ln 11 1 10 1274 Oconnor Ave Wicklow Ct 11 1 10 1275 Oconnor Ave Nantucket Dr 11 1 10 1276 Mary Lake Dr Carlow Way 1 11 1 11 1 1277 Placer Rd Boston Ave 11 1 11 1 1278 Placer Rd Oconnor Ave 2 2 1 3 22 34 4 4279 Placer Rd Almaden Dr 11 1 11 1 1280 Placer St Cottonwood Ave 11 1 10 1281 Placer St Oak St 11 1 61 1282 Placer St Mesa St 1 11 61 1283 Placer St Walnut Ave 11 1 11 1 1284 Placer St Jay St 11 1 10 1285 Placer St Olive Ave 1 2 12 11 1 81 3286 Placer St Magnolia Ave 1 5 1 42 1 21 4 42 6 7287 Placer St Willis St 3 11 1 11 12 33 3 3288 Placer St Chesnut St 11 1 10 1289 Placer St West St 3 4 3 26 2 211422 1 60 7 10290 Placer St Oregon St 1 1 2 111 1 1 2 2 19 2 4291 Placer St Railroad Ave 1 11 1 544 1 1292 Placer St Center St 11 1 10 1293 Placer St California St 7 1123 13 3 70 7294 Placer St Pine St 2 7 10 3 2 5 8 1 1 3 4 5 5 2 74 9 19295 Placer St East St 1 4 6 4213 1 3141 2 41 5 11296 Placer St Continental St 11 1 1 2 2 41 2 2297 Pleasant St Yuba St 11 1 10 1298 Sacramento St Chesnut St 11 1 10 1299 California St Sacramento St 11 1 1 2 71 2300 Pine St Sacramento St 11 1 11 1 1301 Continental St Sacramento St 3 12 21 30 3302 Airpark Dr Gold St 11 1 10 1303 South St Oregon St 11 1 11 1 1304 South St Railroad Ave 11 1 61 1305 South St California St 1 1 5 3 161 2 212314 588 7 10306 South St Pine St 1 2 2 14 21 2 25 3 5307 South St East St 4 3 1 114 2 111112 3 63 7 8308 South St Garden Ave 1 11 10 1309 South St Canal Dr 11 1 30 1 1310 South St Athens Ave 11 1 1 1 1 12 1 2311 Florence St Garden Ave 11 1 61 1312 Florence St Sequoia St 11 1 10 1313 Gold St Waldon St 11 1 10 1 Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
314 Gold St California 11 1 10 1315 Gold St East St 1 1 11 1 1 71 2316 California St Sonoma St 2 11 1 1 20 2317 Pine St Lincoln St 11 1 11 1 1318 Pine St East St 2 11 2 20 2319 Pine St Cypress Ave 12 3 2 322 1 1 2121 2 72 6 8320 Athens Ave Locust St 4 1 22 4 1 1 3 4 52 5 7321 Azela Ave Iris Dr 11 1 10 1322 Mistletoe Ln Shasta Pines Way 11 1 61 1323 Mistletoe Ln Penn Dr 11 1 11 1 1324 Mistletoe Ln Shady Ln 11 1 10 1325 Mistletoe Ln Lindeena Ln 11 1 11 1 1326 Larkspur Ln Executive Way 1 11 10 1327 Larkspur Ln Industrial St 11 1 10 1328 Oxford Rd Yale Ct 11 1 10 1329 Marigold Way Dewberry Dr 11 1 10 1330 Tarmac Rd Tuscany Way 11 1 10 1331 Tarmac Rd Salzburg Trl 11 1 10 1332 Tarmac Rd Charade Way 11 1 1 1 2 41 2 2333 Tarmac Rd Abernathy Ln 11 1 10 1334 Cypress Ave Civic Center Dr 4 2 1211 1 1 1212 26 4 6335 Cypress Ave Athens Ave 12 3 2 1142 1121 2 3 72 6 8336 Park Marina Dr Athens Ave 1 2 11 1 1 11 1 81 3337 Cypress Ave Hartnell Ave 13 6 5 1841 1 12261 4 104 10 15338 E Cypress Ave Lowden Ln 11 1 10 1339 E Cypress Ave Beverly Dr 1 1 1 12 12 1 18 2 3340 E Cypress Ave Rosemary Ave 2 1 12 1 1 12 2 2341 E Cypress Ave Bechelli Ln 1 11 8 5 10 2 1 1 1 1 6 3 4 3 4 85 12 20342 E Cypress Ave I-5 1 1 11 61 1343 E Cypress Ave Larkspur Ln 2 2 2 32 1 2 23 1 36 4 6344 E Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave 1200 11 1 10 1345 E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way 121 3 1 1 3 1 24 3 4346 E Cypress Ave Irwin Rd 11 1 61 1347 E Cypress Ave Heather Ln 1 1 11 2 17 2 2348 E Cypress Ave Oxford Rd 11 2 1 1 1 17 2 2349 Parkview Ave Angelo Ave 11 1 10 1350 Parkview Ave Favretto Ave 1 4 11 3 3 211 1 35 5 5351 Parkview Ave Grape Ave 1 1 11 61 1352 Parkview Ave Akard Ave 12 3 1 22 1 122211 70 6 6353 Parkview Ave State St 11 1 10 1354 State St Leland Ave 11 1 11 1 1355 Fell St Favretto Ave 1 1 11 11 1 1356 Fell St Leland Ave 2 2 11 20 2357 Leland Ave Severtson Dr 11 1 10 1358 Teton Dr Allegheny Ct 11 1 10 1 Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
359 Auburn Dr Donnor Ct 1 11 1 11 1 1360 Court St Railroad Ave 11 2 1 1 17 2 2361 Railroad Ave Sheridan St 1 1 1 11 12 1 2362 Railroad Ave Eugenia Ave 11 1 11 1 1363 Railroad Ave Laurel Ave 11 1 61 1364 Larkspur Ln Maraglia Ave 1 11 11 1 1365 Yana Ave Carleton St 11 1 11 1 1366 East Way Vale dr 11 1 1 11 1 1367 King St Hawn Ave 11 1 10 1368 Goodwater Ave Wilson Ave 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2369 Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 18 2 3370 Hartnell Ave Shotwick Trl 1 1 1 1 2 11 1 551 2 3371 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln 1 2 3 3 1 2 4 1 12 1 3 1 2 3 587 6 9372 Hartnell Ave C St 1 1 1 11 2 12 1 2373 Hartnell Ave Northwoods Way 1 11 544 1 1374 Hartnell Ave School St 11 1 10 1375 Hartnell Ave Lawrence Rd 2 11 1 1 12 2 2376 Hartnell Ave Irwin Rd 1 1 11 1 1 71 2377 Hartnell Ave Reservoir Ln 11 1 61 1378 Hartnell Ave Middleton Ln 1 1 2 1 11 550 2 2379 Hartnell Ave Fairway Ave 3 12 1 2 18 3 3380 Hartnell Ave Fairway Ave 2 1 11 1 1 12 2 2381 Hartnell Ave Kenco Ave 1 1 11 11 1 71 2382 Hartnell Ave Yana Ave 11 1 10 1383 Hartnell Ave East Way 11 1 10 1384 Hartnell Ave Churn Ct 2 11 11 12 2 2385 Hartnell Ave Alta Mesa Dr 2 2 11 12 2 2386 Hartnell Ave Leonard St 1 1 11 61 1387 Hartnell Ave Argyle Rd 11 1 61 1388 Canyon Creek Rd Blazingwood Dr 11 1 61 1389 Wyndham Ln Rivella Vista Dr 1 1 11 61 1390 Wilshire Dr Henderson Rd 11 1 11 1 1391 Bechelli Ln Grove St 11 1 10 1392 Bechelli Ln Leila Ave 3 1 1 2 1 11 2 39 4 4393 Bechelli Ln Parsons Dr 1 1 2 31 12 1 19 2 4394 Bechelli Ln Wilshire Dr 11 1 11 1 1395 Bechelli Ln 3rd St 1 1 11 61 1396 Bechelli Ln 2nd St 2 1 1 1 21 12 1 29 3 4397 Bechelli Ln Layton Rd 11 1 1 1 1 17 2 2398 Bechelli Ln Cheryl Dr 11 1 10 1399 Bechelli Ln Loma Vista Dr 2 1 2 11 11 28 3 3400 Bechelli Ln Chinook Dr 1 1 11 61 1401 Bechelli Ln S Bonnyview Rd 2 1 4 15 1 1 1311 1 32 3 7402 C St Saginaw St 1 11 61 1403 C St 5th St 11 1 61 1 Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
404 Layton Rd Ricardo Ave 11 1 10 1405 Camino Ct Adams Ln 11 1 10 1406 Marlene Ave Flintwood Way 11 1 10 1407 Mercury Dr Jupiter Ter 11 1 10 1408 Vega St Mercury Dr 11 1 10 1409 Cockerill Dr Button Pl 11 1 10 1410 Galaxy Way Meteor St 3 1 1 1 11 1 30 3411 Alta Mesa Dr Saturn Skwy 11 1 1 1 1 71 2412 Galaxy Way Polaris Way 11 1 10 1413 Venus Way Capricorn Way 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2414 Whimbledon Dr Laver St 11 1 10 1415 Airport Rd Skypark Dr 11 1 10 1416 Capricorn Way Bridger Dr 11 1 10 1417 Sunglow Dr Oak Glen Dr 11 1 61 1418 Howard Dr Frances Dr 11 1 10 1419 Cedars Rd Riviera Dr 1 11 1 61 1420 Cedars Rd Kenyon Dr 11 1 11 1 1421 Westside Rd Kenyon Dr 11 1 10 1422 Eastside Rd Wilsey Dr 1 1 11 11 1 1423 Eastside Rd Radio Ln 1 11 1 1 1 71 2424 Radio Ln Veterans Ln 11 1 10 1425 Radio Ln N Bonnyview Rd 11 1 1 1 1 71 2426 E Bonnyview Rd Pioneer Ln 11 1 10 1427 E Bonnyview Rd Barrel Ct 11 1 10 1428 S Bonnyview Rd E Bonnyview Rd 1 3 4 121 91 4429 Westside Rd Canyon Creek Rd 2 21 1 20 2430 Estate St Traverse St 11 1 1 1 1 71 2431 Joaquin Ave Ricardo Ave 2 1 1 11 20 2432 Portal Dr Joaquin Ave 1 1 11 2 17 2 2433 Portal Dr Loma Vista Dr 2 11 2 22 2 2434 Ethan Ln Monterra Ln 11 1 10 1435 Lofty Oak Dr Heavenly Oak Dr 11 1 10 1436 Arizona St Starthmore Dr 11 1 10 1437 Screech Owl Ln Squirrel Run Ct 11 1 10 1438 Dandelion Dr Buttercup Ln 11 1 10 1439 Alta Mesa Dr El Verano St 1 1 11 1 1 17 2 2440 Branstetter Ln Branstetter Ct 1 11 11 1 1441 Cedars Rd Branstetter Ln 111 2 1 2 1 18 2 3442 Cedars Rd Acorn Ln 11 1 11 1 1443 Cedars Rd Concord Ln 1 11 30 1 1444 Westside Rd Cedars Rd 1 11 30 1 1445 S Bonnyview Rd Eastside Rd 14 3 5 254 2 2 25 4 97 8 13446 S Bonnyview Rd Indianwood Dr 2 1 1 112 21 1 29 3 4447 Churn Creek Rd I-5 1 1 11 2 71 2448 Rancho Rd Alta Mesa Dr 2 2 1 12 1 12 14 2 4 Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
449 Rancho Rd Surrey Dr 11 1 10 1450 Rancho Rd Saratoga Dr 11 1 61 1451 Rancho Rd Goodwater Ave 1 1 11 2 17 2 2452 Rancho Rd Persistence Ln 11 2 1 1 41 2 2453 Rancho Rd Rancho Vista Way 11 1 61 1454 Lofty Oak Dr Alrose Ln 11 1 10 1455 Westwood Ave Jewell Ln 11 1 10 1456 Westside Rd Westwood Ave 3 2 21 33 3 3457 Camino Dr Wilder Dr 11 1 10 1458 Eastside Rd North Dr 21 2 1 2 1 13 2 3459 Eastside Rd Sacramento Dr 11 1 61 1460 Eastside Rd Star Dr 2 2 1 122 1 1 3 35 4 5461 Westside Rd Gelngary Dr 11 10 1462 Eastside Rd Girvan Rd 11 1 1 61 1463 Girvan Rd Pit Rd 11 1 10 1464 Girvan Rd Hemlock St 1 1 11 11 1 1465 Girvan Rd Creekside St 11 1 61 1466 Creekside St Brookside Ln 11 1 10 1467 Creekside St Mullen Pkwy 11 1 10 1468 Knighton Rd Lockheed Dr 2 11 1 1 12 2 2469 Churn Creek Rd Kallerup Dr 11 1 30 1 1470 Mistletoe Ln Deerfield Ave 11 1 1 61 1471 Hilltop Dr Hwy 44 11 1 61 1472 Placer St Wisconsin Ave 11 1 10 1473 Eureka Way Olive Ave 11 1 10 1474 East St Locust St 11 1 10 1475 Oro St Travona St 11 1 10 1476 Churn Creek Rd E Entrance to Food Max 11 1 61 1477 Churn Creek Rd Linda Ln 1 1 1 1 11 71 2478 Tehama St Liberty St 11 1 11 1 1479 Sacramento Dr Hemlock St 11 1 11 1 1480 Parkview Ave Freebridge St 1 1 11 1 11 1 1481 Kenyon Dr Calarasas Hts 11 1 10 1482 Old Oregon Trl Lois Ln 11 1 61 1483 Sacramento St Garden Ave 11 1 10 1484 Market St Hill St 1 1 11 10 1 Total 15 43 275 478 509 120 111 393 417 150 13 68 1 91 67 281 272 251 264 252 - - 1320 Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Collisions at Selected Segments
Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
002A AKRICH ST RAINTREE LN OASIS RD 1 1 3 32 1 3 1 20 2 5003A KESWICK DAM RD W CITY LIMIT LAKE BLVD 11 1 1 1 1 41 2 2004A OASIS RD LAKE BLVD ALEE LN 11 1 11 1 1 3 42 2 3 004B OASIS RD DAUT RD OAK LEAF LN 1 11 10 1004C OASIS RD OLD OASIS RD RANDOLPH RD 1 11 1 11 1 1004D OASIS RD BALER RD AKRICH ST 2 1 1 11 1 2 23 2 3 005A OLD OREGON TRL AKRICH ST MIDLAND DR 11 1 10 1
005B OLD OREGON TRL MIDLAND DR N CITY LIMIT 1 2 5 31 3 1 1 3 3 1 28 3 8 006A CASCADE BLVD N CITY LIMIT OASIS RD 1 2 11 1 1 2 81 3007A LAKE BLVD GLENWOOD DR OASIS RD 2 2 11 1 1 12 2 2 007B LAKE BLVD OASIS RD KESWICK DAM BLVD 1 1 1 1 1 11 12 1 2007C LAKE BLVD KESWICK DAM BLVD SANTA ROSA WAY 3 1 1 21 2 1 1 34 3 4007D LAKE BLVD SANTA ROSA WAY ST MARK ST 1 1 3 1 2 1 11 2 1 1 1 20 2 5 007E LAKE BLVD ST MARK ST MOUNTAIN SHADOWS BLVD 12 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 52 3 3 007F LAKE BLVD MOUNTAIN SHADOWS BLVD N MARKET ST 1 7 6 1 7 2 1 2 12 1 3314 3 78 8 14 007G LAKE BLVD BLACK MARBLE DR W/O CAMPERS CT 11 2 5 351 1 1 3 5 58 4 9 008A SR 299 LAKE BLVD E/O I5 NB RAMPS 11 2 1 1 71 2009A MAGNUMS WAY LAKE BLVD ST NICHOLAS AVE 11 1 10 1010A SANTA ROSA WAY MAGNUMS WAY LAKE BLVD 11 1 10 1011A ST MARKS ST N END LAKE BLVD 1 11 1 61 1012A HOOPA PATH LITTLE DEER LN LAKE BLVD 11 1 10 1013A BELTLINE RD GOPHER LN WHITE RIVER DR 2 1 1 11 1 1 1 23 2 3014A CATERPILLAR RD BELTLINE RD N MARKET ST 111 2 1 2 1 18 2 3015A TWIN VIEW BLVD OASIS RD CONSTITUTION WAY 2 1 1 11 12 2 2 015B TWIN VIEW BLVD N MARKET ST MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 1 3 2 1 1 11 2 2 3 1 31 4 6015C TWIN VIEW BLVD TWIN VIEW BLVD TWN PEEKS MOBILE HOME PKWY 11 1 10 1 016A ST ANDREWS DR GOLD HILLS CT S END 11 1 11 1 1017A WHITE RIVER DR BELTLINE RD REDWOOD BLVD 1 1 2 11 36 2 2018A REDWOOD BLVD CATERPILLAR RD NORTH POINT DR 1 2 2 1 11 1 81 3019A NORTH POINT DR LAKE BLVD N MARKET ST 11 1 10 1020A VALLEYRIDGE DR TWIN VIEW BLVD RIDGE RD 11 1 61 1021A N BOULDER DR VALLEYRIDGE DR LAKE BLVD 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 18 2 3022A BOULDER CREEK DR N BOULDER DR E END 11 1 10 1023A BEAUMONT DR W END E END 11 1 10 1024A MOUNTAIN VIEW DR TWIN VIEW BLVD TERRA LINDA WAY 2 11 1 1 20 2025A HAWLEY RD N END LEAF LN 1 11 10 1026A BLACK OAK LN W END HAWLEY RD 11 1 10 1027A COLLYER DR CHURN CREEK RD POISON OAK LN 2 1 1 11 20 2028A COLLEGEVIEW DR BETHEL LN W/O OLD OREGON TRL 2 3 1 1 2 1 11 2 1 2 1 41 5 6029A QUARTZ HILL RD RIVER RIDGE DR S/O MT BONNINGTON DR 1 1 11 2 12 1 2 029B QUARTZ HILL RD S/O MT BONNINGTON DR N MARKET ST 2 11 1 1 3 13 2 3 030A BENTON DR MIDDLE CREEK RD RIVERSIDE DR 1 11 1 10 1 030B BENTON DR MIDDLE CREEK RD N MARKET ST 1 3 4 1 213 1 1 1 4 2 1 33 4 8 031A LOMA ST QUARTZ HILL RD BENTON DR 1 11 11 1 1032A BUENAVENTURA BLVD N CITY LIMIT S END 11 1 10 1033A DELTA ST BETON DR QUARTZ HILL RD 11 1 10 1034A ARBORETUM DR ARBORETUM DR E END 11 1 61 1035A BUCKEYE TR CLAY ST DOGWOOD LN 21 1 1 1 20 2036A DOGWOOD LN W END E END 11 1 1 1 2 41 2 2037A MASONIC AVE LAKE BLVD S END 11 1 10 1038A N MARKET ST LAKE BLVD BENTON DR 1 1 1 2 1 111 18 2 3 038B N MARKET ST BENTON DR QUARTZ HILL RD 1 2 1 2 1 11 13 1 3 Pedestrian
Bicycle
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
038C MARKET ST QUARTZ HILL RD EUREKA WAY 2 1 3 13 11 1 1 1 2 2 31 3 6038D MARKET ST EUREKA WAY TEHAMA ST 11 1 10 1 038E MARKET ST PLACER ST GOLD ST 2 1 1 11 20 2
038F S MARKET ST GOLD ST GEARY ST 2 1 11 1 2 1 13 2 3
039A HILLTOP DR LAKE BLVD N/O HILLTOP DR 1 7 2 4 6 42 1 11 3 2 6 1 2 123 10 14 039B HILLTOP DR N/O HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY 1 2 6 2 2 5 21 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 604 9 11039C HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY S/O RIVER BEND RD 1 2 111 1 2 13 1 3039D HILLTOP DR S/O RIVER BEND RD N/O BROWNING ST 2 4 12111 1 3 1 1 1 26 2 6 039E HILLTOP DR N/O BROWNING ST MARAGLIA ST 1 3 9 14 19 1 11 4 12 10 4 4 5 3 13 10 11 4 8 836 27 46040A PEPPERTREE LN HILLTOP DR WOODCLIFF DR 11 1 10 1041A WOODHILL DR WOODCLIFF DR TEAKWOOD DR 11 1 10 1042A BLACK MARBLE WAY LAKE BLVD S END 1 1 11 61 1043A CAMPERS CT BOULDER DR S END 11 1 11 1 1044A CHURN CREEK RD COLLEGE VIEW DR BROWNING ST 12 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 70 6 6 044B CHURN CREEK RD BROWNING ST DANA DR 14 1 4 1 42 3 1 3 3 1 3 84 6 10044C CHURN CREEK RD DANA DR PRESIDIO ST 11 1 1 2 17 2 2044D CHURN CREEK RD PRESIDIO ST S BONNYVIEW RD 1 4 14 23 28 10 8 9 21 14 4 4 5 5 17 14 14 11 14 984 42 70 044E CHURN CREEK RD S BONNYVIEW RD HARTMEYER LN 2 11 1 1 12 2 2 044F CHURN CREEK RD HARTMEYER LN S/O RANCHO RD 1 2 3 1 32 3 1 2 30 6 045A DAKOTA WAY TIDMORE LN E/O DANBURY DR 11 1 10 1046A CHANCELOR BLVD PALACIO DR HACIENDA DR 11 1 10 1047A SHASTA VIEW DR HEMINGWAY ST INSPIRATION PL 1 1 12 1 12 1 18 2 3 047B SHASTA VIEW DR INSPIRATION PL ATRIUM WAY 11 1 61 1047C SHASTA VIEW DR ATRIUM WAY GOODWATER AVE 31 2 11 1 30 3047D SHASTA VIEW DR GOODWATER AVE LEONARD ST 1 2 2 3 1 2 31 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 67 5 8 047E SHASTA VIEW DR LEONARD ST CASTLEWOOD DR 11 1 10 1
047F SHASTA VIEW DR CASTLEWOOD DR RANCHO RD 21 1 1 1 20 2 048A OLD OREGON TRL S/O LOIS LN E CITY LIMIT 11 1 61 1
048B OLD OREGON TRL ACCIDENT LN VIKING WAY 11 1 30 1 1048C OLD OREGON TRL HARVEY LEIGHTON RD OLD 44 DR 1 2 5 1 213 1 2 2 4 28 3 8048D OLD OREGON TRL OLD 44 DR HARTNELL AVE 2 1 12 1 2 13 2 3 048E OLD OREGON TRL MISTY LN RANCHO RD 11 2 2 12 1 2
048F OLD OREGON TRL RANCHO RD DESPARADO TRL 11 1 61 1
049A MISSION SIERRA CT MISSION DE ORO DR E END 2 11 1 1 20 2050A MISSION DE ORO DR MILL VALLEY PKWY BROWNING ST 1 11 11 1 1051A CANBY RD SPRINGER DR BROWNING ST 11 1 11 1 1 052B CANBY RD BROWNING ST OLD ALTURAS RD 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 18 2 3 053A BROWNING ST HILLTOP DR CANBY RD 2 11 2 20 2
053B BROWNING ST CHURN CREEK RD OLD ALTURAS RD 11 1 10 1 054A SPRINGER DR S/O BOBWHITE WAY WHISTLING DR 1 11 1 61 1055A WHISTLING DR SPRINGER DR S/O PARTRIDGE DR 11 1 10 1056A WINGSETTER WAY PARTRIDGE DR PARTRIDGE DR 1 11 11 1 1057A LANCERS LN CHURN CREEK RD BROWNING ST 1 1 1 1 1 11 12 1 2058A BRANDON CT N END S END 11 1 10 1059A GROUSE DR WHISTLING DR N/O PARTRIDGE DR 1 2 21 1 1 1 13 1 3060A EDGEWOOD DR N END OLD ALTURAS RD 11 1 10 1061A OLD ALTURAS RD CANBY RD BROWNING ST 3 2 4 13131 1 1312 2 49 5 9 061B OLD ALTURAS RD BROWNING ST LEMA RD 2 1 1 31 1 1 2 29 3 4 062A ARROYO MANOR DR OLD ALTURAS RD CASA VEREDA WAY 11 1 11 1 1063A DANA DR HILLTOP DR BRADFORD RD 1 7 6 1 2 6 3 1 11 1 3311 6 59 8 14 063B DANA DR BRADFORD RD VICTOR AVE 11 2 1 1 17 2 2
064A E PALISADES AVE VIEW AVE HILLTOP DR 11 1 61 1065A FRIENDLY RD OLD ALTURAS RD DANA DR 1 2 1 2 11 1 1 23 3 3 Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
066A SALMONBERRY DR MARIGOLD WAY E/O IMPERIAL DR 1 11 11 1 1067A VICTOR AVE DANA DR AZOULAY CT 2 11 1 1 20 2 067B VICTOR AVE AZOULAY CT MISTLETOE LN 1 1 11 1 1 31 1 2067C VICTOR AVE MISTLETOE LN BURKSGARDEN ST 2 1 12 1 1 1 13 2 3067D VICTOR AVE BURKSGARDEN ST E CYPRESS AVE 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 37 2 3 067E VICTOR AVE E CYPRESS AVE S/O BUNKER ST 1 2 1 2 1 1 11 13 1 3 067F VICTOR AVE S/O BUNKER ST GALAXY WAY 3 5 3 1 3 41 1 11 2 2 3 1 3 66 8 11 067G VICTOR AVE EL VISTA ST CHURN CREEK RD 11 1 61 1
068A LEISHA LN W END E END 11 1 10 1069A WEST ST 7TH ST EUREKA WAY 1 11 1 11 1 1070A 11TH ST EUREKA WAY N COURT ST 1 1 11 1 1 17 2 2071A RIVERSIDE DR N COURT ST N MARKET ST 1 1 11 1 1 71 2072A CENTER ST RIVERSIDE DR EUREKA WAY 11 1 10 1073A CALIFORNIA ST RIVERSIDE DR TRINITY ST 11 1 10 1 073B CALIFORNIA ST EUREKA WAY TEHAMA ST 11 1 10 1073C CALIFORNIA ST TEHAMA ST GOLD ST 11 1 1 1 1 71 2073D CALIFORNIA ST GOLD ST S MARKET ST 11 1 11 1 1 074A CONTINENTAL ST N/O TRINITY ST SOUTH ST 11 1 61 1075A AUDITORIUM DR W END SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR 11 1 10 1076A SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR 11 1 1 2 71 2077A PALISADES AVE HILLTOP DR S END 2 11 1 1 20 2078A ASPIN AVE VICTOR AVE E END 11 1 10 1079A SHINING STAR WAY TUSCANY WAY VIENNA WAY 11 1 10 1080A TARMAC RD TUSCANY WAY CROSSFIRE WAY 11 1 10 1081A ABERNATHY LN TARMAC RD HWY 44 11 1 11 1 1082A AIRSTRIP RD TRUMPET DR S END 1 11 30 1 1083A VIKING WAY AIRSTRIP RD N STAR DR 1 1 11 1 1 17 2 2084A OLD 44 DR OLD OREGON TRL BRANDY LN 11 1 10 1085A LYNBROOK LOOP CARSON DR CARSON DR 1 11 1 11 1 1086A EUREKA WAY RIDGE DR N COURT ST 11 1 111 1 2 42 2 3 086B EUREKA WAY N COURT ST N MARKET ST 2 1 12 1 1 1 1 28 3 3 087A RIDGE DR EUREKA WAY LAKESIDE DR 11 1 10 1088A BUENAVENTURA BLVD EUREKA WAY LAKESIDE DR 11 1 10 1 088B BUENAVENTURA BLVD TETON DR CANYON CREEK RD 1 2 1 11 2 1 81 3088C BUENAVENTURA BLVD CANYON CREEK RD RAILROAD AVE 2 1 1 1 11 22 2 2 089A GALWAY DR N/O BRINN DR MOYVANE DR 11 1 10 1090A RECORD LN W CITY LIMIT E END 11 1 10 1091A KILDARE DR OCONNOR AVE N/O KILDARE CT 11 1 10 1092A LAKESIDE DR KILKEE DR BUENAVENTURA BLVD 11 1 61 1093A MANZANITA HILLS AVE FOOTHILL BLVD SHASTA ST 11 1 10 1094A ALMOND AVE EUREKA WAY PLACER ST 11 1 10 1095A SHASTA ST FOOTHILL BLVD WEST ST 13 3 1 1 1 2 91 4 095B SHASTA ST WEST ST CALIFORNIA ST 1 1 2 2 11 2 1 1 19 2 4095C SHASTA ST MARKET ST PINE ST 22 1 1 20 2095D SHASTA ST PINE ST LIBERTY ST 11 1 61 1 096A WILLIS ST EUREKA WAY PLACER ST 2 1 2 11 1 2 23 2 3097A CHESNUT ST SHASTA ST S/O AMELIA CT 11 1 10 1098A OLIVE AVE EUREKA WAY PLACER ST 1 1 1 1 1 11 71 2099A N COURT ST RIVERSIDE DR EUREKA WAY 11 1 10 1 099B COURT ST EUREKA WAY YUBA ST 1 6 3211 2131 17 1 7099C COURT ST YUBA ST PLACER ST 1 11 61 1099D COURT ST PLACER ST GOLD ST 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 13 1 3 099E COURT ST GOLD ST SCHLEY AVE 11 1 1 1 1 17 2 2
Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
100A PINE ST SHASTA ST CYPRESS AVE 3 1 5 3 32 1 12 1 2 3 3 44 4 9101A EAST ST TEHAMA ST PLACER ST 11 1 11 1 1 101B EAST ST SACRAMENTO ST LINCOLN ST 11 1 10 1101C EAST ST LINCOLN ST PINE ST 1 1 11 1 1 71 2 102A LIBERTY ST BUTTE ST PLACER ST 11 1 11 1 1103A YUBA ST COURT ST CALIFORNIA ST 1 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2 103B YUBA ST PINE ST CONTINENTAL ST 11 1 10 1
104A PARK MARINA DR SEQUOIA ST SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR 1 1 1 1 11 17 2 2 104B PARK MARINA DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR ROME AVE 1 2 1 1 21 1 1 2 24 3 4104C PARK MARINA DR ROME AVE WASHINGTON AVE 1 2 12 1 1 1 81 3104D PARK MARINA DR WASHINGTON AVE LOCUST ST 11 1 61 1 104E PARK MARINA DR LOCUST ST PARKVIEW AVE 22 2 22 2 2105A TEHAMA ST MARKET ST CONTINENTAL ST 11 1 11 1 1106A PLACER ST BOSTON AVE CUMBERLAND DR 2 3 11 3 1 4 15 2 5 106B PLACER ST CUMBERLAND DR HIGHLAND AVE 6 4 3 1 423 3 3 1 4 1 2 5 93 10 13106C PLACER ST HIGHLAND AVE JAY ST 11 1 10 1106D PLACER ST JAY ST EAST ST 3 3 10 1 5 4 2 1 2 1 2 4 6 2 1 3 61 6 16 106E PLACER ST EAST ST E END 22 1 1 20 2107A SACRAMENTO ST CALIFORNIA ST EAST ST 2 11 1 1 20 2108A SOUTH ST COURT ST EAST ST 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 21 33 1 4 108B SOUTH ST EAST ST ATHENS AVE 1 1 1 1 1 11 17 2 2108C SOUTH ST ATHENS AVE PARK MARINA DR 21 1 2 20 2 109A SEQUOIA ST BUTTE ST SOUTH ST 11 1 10 1110A ATHENS AVE PARK MARINA DR SOUTH ST 11 1 10 1 110B ATHENS AVE SOUTH ST CYPRESS AVE 1 2 11 1 2 1 81 3
111A CANAL DR SOUTH ST LOCUST ST 11 1 10 1112A LOCUST ST EAST ST ATHENS AVE 3 12 1 1 1 30 3113A CIVIC CENTER DR LOCUST ST CYPRESS AVE 1 1 4 2 11 2 1 1 3 1 21 2 6114A W CYPRESS AVE MARKET ST PARK MARINA DR 11 5 4 4 2 3 1 4 1 4 4 2 4322 4 657 11 15 114B E CYPRESS AVE PARK MARINA DR CHURN CREEK RD 1 3 8 23 16 4 7 6 24 3 1 2 4 4 5 8 6 9 13 15 876 35 51114C E CYPRESS AVE CHURN CREEK RD ALFREDA WAY 1 3 12 1 1 2 1 91 4114D E CYPRESS AVE ALFREDA WAY VICTOR AVE 3 2 2 11 32 1 2 2 2 1 47 5 7 114E E CYPRESS AVE VICTOR AVE E END 1 11 10 1115A MISTLETOE LN CHURN CREEK RD E END 12 2 3 1 24 1 11 1 4 3 67 5 8116A INDUSTRIAL ST CHURN CREEK RD E END 11 1 10 1117A CANBY RD N END MISTLETOE LN 11 1 10 1118A OXFORD RD N/O OAKDALE LN E CYPRESS AVE 11 1 10 1119A MANCHESTER DR VICTOR AVE E END 1 11 10 1120A GOODWATER AVE W END SHASTA VIEW DR 1 1 11 11 1 1 120B GOODWATER AVE SHASTA VIEW DR HARTNELL AVE 11 1 61 1 121A HENDERSON RD N END WILSHIRE DR 1 11 2 1 1 2 37 2 3122A HARTNELL AVE E CYPRESS AVE C ST 3 3 7 1 2 3 1 4 1 11 1 4222 3 58 6 13 122B HARTNELL AVE NORTHWOODS WAY KENCO AVE 1 3 6 9 13 2 5 4 11 6 4 6 2 2 11 10 5 4 767 19 32122C HARTNELL AVE YANA AVE SHASTA VIEW DR 2 2 4 2 221 1 1 3 1 2 2 38 4 8122D HARTNELL AVE GOODWATER AVE AIRPORT RD 12 2 2 1 1 3 2 3 2 1 1 618 5 7 123A HARTNELL AVE YANA AVE CHURN CT 2 11 1 1 1 22 2 2124A BECHELLI LN S/O TURTLE BAY PARK E CYPRESS AVE 1 1 4 1311 1 3 2 21 2 6 124B BECHELLI LN E CYPRESS AVE N/O 3RD ST 1 1 4 14 9 4 4 3 14 1 2 1 1 4 5 8 5 5 6 711 20 29124C BECHELLI LN 3RD ST CHINOOK DR 2 3 5 1 1 3 23 1 1 3 5 45 5 10124D BECHELLI LN CHINOOK DR N/O S BONNYVIEW RD 1 11 1 1 1 71 2 124E BECHELLI LN N/O S BONNYVIEW RD S BONNYVIEW RD 1 1 1 3 1 11 37 2 3 124F BECHELLI LN S BONNYVIEW RD SUNNYHILL LN 11 1 10 1
125A JUNE ST MARAGLIA ST S END 1 11 1 2 12 1 2
Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
126A LARKSPUR LN MARAGLIA ST PARSONS DR 11 1 61 1
126B LARKSPUR LN INDUSTRIAL ST E CYPRESS AVE 11 1 61 1
127A ALFREDA WAY E CYPRESS AVE HARTNELL AVE 11 1 10 1128A RESERVOIR LN E CYPRESS AVE HARTNELL AVE 11 1 10 1129A SOBRE CT E CYPRESS AVE S END 1 11 1 11 1 1130A WILSON AVE W/O JASMINE WAY GOODWATER AVE 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2131A DARTMOUTH DR RAINIER DR E/O SIENA AVE 1 11 11 1 1132A WASATCH DR CUMBERLAND DR E END 11 1 10 1133A BLUE BELL DR ASPEN GLOW LN E END 11 1 10 1134A STARBURST DR BLUE BELL DR CANYON CREEK RD 11 1 10 1135A AIRPARK DR PLACER ST ROSALINE AVE 11 1 61 1136A ROSALINE AVE AIRPARK DR COURT ST 11 2 1 1 12 1 2137A LINDEN AVE W END WEST ST 1 11 30 1 1138A WEST ST ROSALINE AVE LAUREL AVE 11 1 61 1139A LAUREL AVE WEST ST RAILROAD AVE 11 1 10 1140A RAILROAD AVE YUBA ST PLACER ST 11 1 10 1 140B RAILROAD AVE SOUTH ST BUENAVENTURA BLVD 12 2 4 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 3212 2 651 9 10 141A PARKVIEW AVE S MARKET ST STATE ST 1 1 2 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 38 2 4 141B PARKVIEW AVE STATE ST FREEBRIDGE ST 1 1 11 61 1141C PARKVIEW AVE FREEBRIDGE ST CYPRESS AVE 1 1 2 11 17 2 2 142A FAVRETTO AVE PARKVIEW AVE GRANGE ST 11 1 10 1143A FELL ST S MARKET ST LELNAD AVE 11 1 10 1144A LELAND AVE PARKVIEW AVE GRANGE ST 11 1 10 1145A FREEBRIDGE ST SMILE PL RIO ST 11 1 10 1146A HAMILTON ST FREEBRIDGE ST E END 11 1 10 1147A RIO ST W END MAHAN ST 11 1 10 1148A GEARY ST S MARKET ST POLK ST 11 1 10 1149A TEXAS SPRINGS RD S CITY LIMIT BRANSTETTER LN 11 1 11 1 1150A BRANSTETTER LN TEXAS SPRINGS RD S MARKET ST 11 1 10 1151A HOWARD DR SUNGLOW DR EL RENO LN 1 11 1 1 1 71 2152A SUNGLOW DR WINTER GREEN CT OAK GLEN DR 11 1 61 1153A RIVIERA DR OAK GLEN DR CEDARS RD 1 1 11 1 1 1 17 2 2154A KENYON DR W END E/O CHANTILLY LN 11 1 10 1155A CEDARS RD EL RANCHO RD S MARKET ST 1 21 2 2 1 13 1 3156A WESTSIDE RD CANYON CREEK RD CEDARS RD 2 7 112 5 2 2 1 2 2 29 2 9 156B WESTSIDE RD JEWELL LN WESTWOOD AVE 2 2 11 20 2156C WESTSIDE RD WESTWOOD AVE GLENGARY DR 11 1 11 1 1156D WESTSIDE RD CLEAR CREEK RD SR 273 1 11 61 1 157A SEVERTSON DR LELAND AVE E END 1 11 1 11 1 1158A EASTSIDE RD WYNDHAM LN N/O S BONNYVIEW RD 1 2 2 1 2 11 3 2 44 3 5 158B EASTSIDE RD N/O S BONNYVIEW RD S BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 61 1158C EASTSIDE RD S BONNYVIEW RD GIRVAN RD 1 5 9 2 4 1 71 5 2 5 2 1 50 6 15 159A E BONNYVIEW RD RADIO LN S BONNYVIEW RD 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 18 2 3160A BONNYVIEW AVE BONNIE DR N BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 61 1161A N BONNYVIEW RD EASTSIDE RD E/O E BONNYVIEW RD 1 1 11 30 1 1162A BIDWELL RD N END N BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 10 1163A RENO LN N END S BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 10 1164A OLD BARN WAY FARM HOUSE LN BARREL CT 11 1 10 1165A C ST HARTNELL AVE LAYTON RD 2 11 1 1 20 2166A SAGNAW ST W END C ST 11 1 10 1167A 2ND ST BECHELLI LN C ST 11 1 10 1168A RICARDO AVE LAYTON RD JOAQUIN AVE 22 1 1 20 2169A LOMA VISTA DR BECHELLI LN ETHAN LN 1 11 1 11 1 1 Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
170A DIANE ST CHARLENE WAY WOODACRE DR 11 1 30 1 1171A KERRYJEN CT W END RICARDO AVE 11 1 10 1172A LE BRUN LN CHURN CREEK RD LAWRENCE RD 2 33 2 1 2 1 2 15 2 5173A LAWRENCE RD HARTNELL AVE MADEWOOD LN 1 1 1 1 11 12 1 2174A HARPOLE RD CHURN CREEK RD E/O ALMA AVE 11 1 10 1175A HARROW DR HARPOLE RD S END 11 1 61 1176A SUNWOOD DR N/O VEGA ST MORNINGSUN DR 11 1 10 1177A DOMINION DR DENTON WAY JAMES PL 11 1 10 1178A CONIFER WAY W/O VICTOR AVE E/O VICTOR AVE 11 1 10 1179A ALTA MESA DR HARTNELL AVE RANCHO RD 3 1 311 1 2 1 34 3 4180A ALDEN AVE COCKERILL ST SHASTA VIEW DR 11 1 61 1181A SUZETTE AVE ALTA MESA DR LARAMIE ST 11 1 10 1182A SATURN SKWY MERCURY DR SHASTA VIEW DR 11 1 1 1 1 71 2183A SCORPIUS WAY SATURN SKWY GALAXY WAY 1 11 1 2 12 1 2184A ORION WAY SATURN SKWY VENUS WAY 1 1 11 61 1185A POLARIS WAY SATURN SKWY S/O NEBULA ST 11 1 10 1186A GALAXY WAY MORNINGSUN DR MEADOW OAKS WAY 2 11 1 1 22 2 2187A NEBULA ST VIRGO ST POLARIS WAY 11 1 10 1188A EL VERANO ST COLUMBINE DR ST CHARLES DR 11 1 11 1 1189A CASABELLA DR ST CHARLES DR W/O TEMPLETON DR 11 1 10 1190A RANCHO RD BO PEEP LN SHASTA VIEW DR 11 1 10 1 190B RANCHO RD GOODWATER AVE OLD OREGON TRL 11 1 2 111 1 1 1 1 1 2 49 3 5 191A LEONARD ST HARTNELL AVE N/O FOREST HOMES DR 11 1 10 1192A ARGLE RD HARTNELL AVE AIRPORT RD 11 1 1 2 12 1 2193A AIRPORT RD PRESERVE BLVD N/O BILLY JEAN LN 11 1 11 1 1 193B AIRPORT RD ENGINEERS LN MILL LN 1 5 1 4 1 11 1 4 1 1 42 6 7193C AIRPORT RD S/O SYLVIA LN S CITY LIMIT 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 21 1 1 2 2 1 3 72 6 8 194A ELECTRO WAY AIRPORT RD E END 11 1 10 1195A KNIGHTON RD SW CITY LIMIT AIRPORT RD 11 1 10 1196A WOODRUM CIR MUNICIPAL BLVD MUNICPAL BLVD 1 11 1 61 1197A S BONNYVIEW RD S MARKET ST CHURN CREEK RD 2 5 6 13 2 6 6 3 8 1 3 2459 6 164 13 26198A SACRAMENTO DR E/O CENTER DR W/O RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 2 11 12 1 2199A CLEAR CREEK RD E/O SW CITY LIMIT S/W CITY LIMIT 211 2 2 2 1 1 29 3 4 199B CLEAR CREEK RD SW CITY LIMIT SR 273 11 1 10 1
200A CREEKSIDE ST MULLEN PKWY GIRVAN RD 11 1 10 1201A GIRVAN RD EASTSIDE RD CREEKSIDE ST 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2202A PIT RD N/O BROOCH CT S/O PLATINUM WAY 1 11 11 1 1203A REDDING RANCHERIA RD W END RT 273 11 1 10 1204A CANYON RD RT 273 S/O S CITY LIMIT 1 2 31 4 1 1 121 2 45 3 6205A VALLEY VIEW RD N END CANYON RD 11 1 10 1206A JULY WAY YULETIDE AVE E/O PATTERSON CT 11 1 10 1207A GOLD ST CALIFORNIA ST MARKET ST 11 1 10 1 207B GOLD ST MARKET ST PINE ST 11 1 11 1 1
208A ECHO RD CHURN CREEK RD ODIN CT 11 1 10 1209A ROME AVE ATHENS AVE PARK MARINA DR 1 11 10 1210A SACRAMENTO RIVER TRL MIDDLE CREEK RD OVERHILL DR 1 1 11 30 1 1211A PARSONS DR HARTNELL AVE CHURN CREEK RD 11 1 10 1212A DOWNARD LN CHURN CREEK RD E END 11 1 61 1213A GOLD ST WEST ST COURT ST 11 1 10 1 Total 9 50 221 285 477 112 158 154 195 261 49 60 53 71 55 208 215 217 181 221 - - 1044 Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Appendix B – Stakeholder
and Public Input
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Meeting Summary
GHD
669 Pacific Street Suite A San Luis Obispo California 93401 United States T +1 805 242 0461 W www.ghd.com
December 18, 2020
To: Shelby Nadin Project: City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)

From: Kathy Kleinschmidt (GHD) Ref/Job No.: 11215289
CC: Farid Rahman (GHD)
Emily Darke (GHD)
File No.: LRSPMS0001.docx
Subject: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Meeting #1 Summary – December 10th, 2020 The following is GHD’s understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced meeting. Please notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.

This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on December 10th, 2020 via Microsoft Teams platform. A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.

All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the end of this document.

1. Introductions
A. Attendees of LRSP meeting
I. Self-introductions of meeting attendees
a. Attendees are listed at the back of the document

2. Meeting Summary
A. Background
I. Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)
a. Similar process to a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR), but replacing the SSAR process by Caltrans and FHWA
b. Consistent with the State’s Strategic Safety Plan (SHSP) and focuses on the 5 E’S of traffic safety – Engineering, Education, Enforcement, Emergency Response and Emerging Technologies (new addition) c. Circular process with a living document – updated periodically. d. Will be required for next cycle of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - Cycle 11.

B. Current Emerging Technologies
I. Signal preemption for emergency response and a project is being investigated regarding preemption (transit priority at signals) for buses II. Signal coordination along corridors
III. Communication with traffic signals
C. Focus Challenge Areas per SHSP - Challenge areas will be identified based on collision data and interactive poll with the LRSP group participants were taken during the meeting.

Top 5 challenge areas identified in the poll are shown below. Results of the interactive poll are attached to this meeting summary.

I. Pedestrian
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 2
II. Distracted Driving
III. Bicyclists
IV. Intersection
V. Impaired Driving
a. Mark Montgomery (Redding Police Department) mentioned that PD is implementing DUI checkpoints to address impaired driving b. 6 required checkpoints per Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant c. Effectiveness of DUI checkpoints are somewhat diminished by social media release of locations of checkpoint. Drivers are aware of where the checkpoints will be. Some unlicensed drivers are caught at DUI checkpoint.
d. Some impaired drivers are apprehended in the periphery of the checkpoints by patrolling officers.
e. DUI saturation patrols is the most effective way of apprehending DUI drivers
D. Overall Collision Analysis
I. Collision density map of all City of Redding collisions shows concentration of collisions along the following corridors.
a. Hartnell Avenue
b. Cypress Avenue
c. Churn Creek Road
d. Hilltop Road
e. Lake Boulevard
f. Rancho Road – S Bonnyview Road
II. Collision Density map of City of Redding fatal and severe injury collision shows concentration of collisions along the following corridors. a. Cypress Avenue
b. Hartnell Avenue
c. Lake Boulevard
d. Churn Creek Road
III. Caltrans collision analysis shows high density of collisions along SR 299, SR 44 and SR 273, at the intersection of SR 299 (Eureka Way) and SR 273 (S market Street) and at the intersection of SR 44 (Tehama Street) and SR 273 (S Market Street).

IV. Collision Severity and Type On City roadways
a. Within the City there were 25 fatal and 93 severe injury collisions in the last 5 years (2015-2019).
b. Main types of fatal collisions are broadside and pedestrian-vehicle collisions.
c. Top five collision types are broadside, rear ends, hit-object, sideswipe and head-on collisions
i. There are advanced dilemma zone detection at some of the city intersections.
ii. Distracted driving is a contributing factor in rear-end collisions. d. Reflective back plates at signals is another countermeasure that can be implemented at signalized intersection to reduce rear-end collisions. i. Currently Caltrans is implementing this countermeasure at locations that are likely to experience power outage due to weather conditions. Data on effectiveness of this
countermeasure is limited. (confirmed by Jesse Solorio
(Caltrans))
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 3
ii. City of Redding does not have any intersection with this countermeasure.
e. Hit object collisions can be mitigated by installing delineators on fixed objects inside the clear recovery zones.

E. Environmental Factor
I. Most collisions were in dry condition when there were no unusual condition in roadways.

II. There were three collision reported as “streetlight not functioning”. These collisions (two in 2019 and one in 2018) were located at the following locations:
a. Hilltop Drive 85’ east of Mercedes Lane
b. Churn Creek Road at Hillmonte Drive
c. Hartnell Avenue at Victor Avenue
d. GHD will coordinate with the City with the details of this information F. Violation Category
I. The top 5 violation category for City collisions are: unsafe speed, DUI/BUI, automobile right of way violation, wrong side of the road driving and improper turning.

II. Unsafe Speed at busy intersections could be because other vehicles are in slow speed conditions (stop and go type traffic) where unsafe start would maybe be more applicable
G. Pedestrian Collisions
I. There were 163 total collisions pedestrian related collision recorded in the City of Redding roadways. Pedestrians involved in crossing were crossing in crosswalk at intersection, crossing not in a crosswalk and walking in road, including shoulder.

II. Collisions were observed along Lake Boulevard, S Market St, E Cypress Avenue, Hartnell Avenue, and Placer Street
III. Mark Montgomery (Redding Police) mentioned that pedestrian collisions at segment could be caused by certain population not recognize crossing at designated locations (pedestrian violations). There are mitigation measures (crossing) at some of the highlighted segments already. a. Potential education program can be implement to combat this.

IV. A location of concern along SR 273 is near the Win-River Resort and Casino.

Redding police reports that some pedestrian wearing dark clothing are crossing SR 273 (S Market Street) mid-block (not at crossing) north of the intersection of SR 273 (S Market Street) at Redding Rancheria Road.
a. Pedestrians are crossing near the south end of the bridge over Clear Creek and walking along the west side of the bridge (pedestrians are walking northbound opposite direction of traffic flow) near edgeline where no sidewalks are present. Lighting is also limited at this location. b. There is a transient trail across the street which is creating the demand for a crossing.
c. Pedestrians crossing are often under the influence.
d. Caltrans has a few projects in the area including
i. Enhanced crosswalk at Girvan Rd which will adjust some grades at the railroad crossing
ii. A grade separated path is planned on the west side of SR 273 but the path will merge with the bridge.
iii. John Abshier (City of Redding Public Works) has sent the plans for the improvement to GHD to be included in the LRSP process.

H. Bicycle Collisions
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 4
I. Broadside is the most common bicycle collision type; there are a total of 122 bicycle collisions recorded in the City of Redding roadways.

II. Wrong Side of Road is top violation category
a. Some bicyclists travelling the wrong way on the sidewalk and coming off into intersection
b. Concentration of bicycle collisions on Lake Blvd
i. Possibly due to high concentration of driveways
I. Collision source
I. The current analysis takes into account all collisions reported to SWITRS. a. The city has their own database of collisions.
b. Redding Police Department is recording collisions on the Spillman database
i. This database does not include property damage only (PDO) collisions.

J. Current Safety related projects
I. HSIP Projects
a. Hartnell Avenue from Churn Creek Road to Victor Avenue – In planning/construction
i. Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
ii. American with Disability (ADA) compliant curb ramp and other facilities
iii. Restriping of roadway to include 2 travel lanes in each direction, a Two-way-left turn lane and buffered bike lanes.
iv. Enhanced crossings across Hartnell Avenue with refuge island at Alfreda Way and east of Reservoir Lane.
v. Consolidation of driveway (access management) to reduce vehicular conflict
b. Churn Creek Road Hartnell Road and Cypress Avenue – In planning/construction
i. Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
ii. Restriping of roadway to include bike lanes
iii. Enhanced crossing across Churn Creek Road at the intersection of Margalia St
iv. Possible installation of speed reduction tables at Maraglia Street at Blueview Street and at Larkspur Lane near Parsons Middle School
c. Systemic intersection lighting – submitted Cycle 10
i. Focused on broadside collisons and night collisions
ii. Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) was 30+ (very competitive) d. Protected left turn phasing in downtown area – submitted in Cycle 10 i. Focused on broadside collisions
ii. BCR was 17-18 (very competitive)
II. ATP grant application
a. Victor Avenue from E Cypress Avenue to Hartnell Road. i. Protected intersection Hartnell Road and Victor Avenue ii. Roundabout at E Cypress Avenue and Victor Avenue
iii. Shared use path and bike lanes on west side of Victor Avenue b. E Cypress Avenue from Alfreda Way to Victor Avenue
c. Alfreda Way north of E Cypress St
d. Sundial Bridge Drive shared used path (Downtown to Turtle Bay) i. Currently there is a gap in the path that connects Sacramento Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 5
River Trail to downtown at the Sundial Bridge Drive Bridge across SR 44 (South of the intersection of Sundial Bridge Drive and SR 44 Westbound Off-ramp).

III. Other Projects
a. Trinity Street Bikeway Project
i. Proposed Cycle track along Trinity Street, South on Continental Street and East on Butte Street (becomes Park Marina Dr) ii. This will connect to the Sacramento River trail once the Sundial Bridge Drive cycle track is constructed.

1. City is doing due diligent analysis before
implementing cycle tracks.

2. Bike signals are not included in downtown for
now.
b. Sundial Bridge Drive improvements around Redding Civic Auditorium i. Tighten up and raise (vertically) the intersection of Sundial Bridge Drive toward the parking lot and Sundial Bridge Drive toward Sheraton Redding Hotel.
ii. North leg of the intersection will be one-way traffic. This will be part of a loop that will increase circulation when there are events at the Auditorium.
c. Other raised intersection in Downtown.
d. Shelby Nadin (City of Redding) will send GHD the HSIP applications, ATP applications and plans associated with planned and proposed safety related projects.

K. School related Issues
I. There is only way in and out for Boulder Creek Elementary School (through Whistling Drive) so there is a lot of traffic nearby
II. Turtle Bay School is the most populated campus on the west side of Redding a. Several mitigation projects but still poses some issues L. Priority list of locations
I. Beside the number of collisions, top locations are also identified based on Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scale. EPDO weights locations based on collision severity as well as number of collisions.

II. Locations with collision history can also be ranked based on collision rates. This process will normalize the number of collisions based on the daily traffic.

III. Top Study Intersections
a. Churn Creek Road at Hartnell Avenue is the top intersection in term of EPDO and total collisions.
b. Cypress at Hilltop had red-light enforcement project (around 2012) which helped to bring it lower down on the list
i. Highest volume intersection in Redding
IV. Top Study Segments
a. Churn Creek Road from Presidio to S Bonnyview Road is top segment i. During the meeting, this segment was identified incorrectly as Churn Creek Road from Presidio to Dana Drive.

M. Countermeasure Development
I. Comprehensive approach will be applied which incorporates systemic and hot spot approach.

II. Proven Countermeasures
a. Caltrans has a list of countermeasures (published in the Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM)) that can be funded by the HSIP.

Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 6
III. Leading Pedestrian Intervals
a. John Abshier (City of Redding Public Works) has provided GHD with a list of six city intersections with leading ped interval (LPI).

N. Vision, Goals and Priorities
I. Members of the LRSP working group will coordinate with Kathy Kleinschmidt (GHD) in forming vision, goals and missions. Example of vision goals and mission are shown below
a. Vision:
i. Toward Vision Zero – The aim is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy and equitable mobility for all.
ii. Working together in creating a comprehensive roadway safety plan that encourages improved safety for all users, whether it is walking, biking and driving – because every person in our community matters.
b. Goal example:
i. Strive to achieve zero deaths and life altering injuries on local roadways
ii. Increase safety with roadway infrastructure improvements iii. Identify countermeasures to correlate to emphasis areas (5 – E’s)
iv. Increase walking, biking, rolling (wheelchair, skateboard, scoter, etc.) to downtown district, to work and to school)
c. Mission example:
i. Redding will provide a safe and sustainable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways in the City of Redding.

II. Performance measures should be specific, measureable, achievable, relevant and time constrained (SMART).

III. Mitigation strategies should correlate with challenge areas.

O. Public Outreach
I. Social Pinpoint Website
a. City prefers sooner rather than later to launch website

3. Next Steps
A. Finalize Vision, goals and mission
B. The report will be a living document that will be update periodically C. GHD will compile current and planned safety projects D. GHD will Develop Safety Projects
I. Benefit/ Cost analysis based on HSIP analyzer
II. Will be ready for the next HSIP Cycle
E. Website will be made publically available after review from City staff.

I. Public outreach results will be presented at the next meeting F. Next LRSP meeting will be virtual near the beginning of 2021.

List of Attendees

1. Shelby Nadin – Associate Engineer, City of Redding

2. John Abshier – Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Redding

3. Mark Montgomery – Sergeant, Redding Police Department

4. Jesse Solorio – Traffic Operations Engineer, Caltrans

5. John Heath – Associate Engineer, Shasta County Public Works Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 7

6. Robert Fellinger – Chief Business Official, Redding Unified School District

7. Sara Sundquist – Healthy Shasta Coordinator, Healthy Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and Human Services

8. Sean Tiedgen – Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

9. Kathy Kleinschmidt – Project Manager, GHD

10. Farid Rahman – Transportation Engineer, GHD

11. Emily Darke – Transportation Engineer, GHD
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Meeting Summary
GHD
669 Pacific Street Suite A San Luis Obispo California 93401 United States T +1 805 242 0461 W www.ghd.com
May 3, 2021
To: Shelby Nadin Project: City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)

From: Kathy Kleinschmidt Ref/Job No.: 11215289
CC: Emily Darke File No.: LRSPMS002.docx
Subject: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Meeting #2 Summary – May 3, 2021 The following is GHD’s understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced meeting. Please notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.

This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on May 3, 2021 via Microsoft Teams platform. A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.

All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the end of this document.

1. Introductions
a. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City – Shelby Nadin b. LRSP stakeholder group members

2. Summary of 1st Stakeholder Meeting
a. Meeting Summary
i. Challenge/Emphasis areas

1. Pedestrians

2. Distracted Driving

3. Bicyclists

4. Intersections

5. Impaired Driving

6. Speeding (associated with Aggressive Driving)

7. Add ‘Roadway Design’
ii. Collision analysis
iii. Projects in the City
b. Vision, Mission, and Goals
i. Sent form to stakeholders to provide input

3. Recent Developments
a. Review of collision analysis
i. Top violation category was unsafe speed

1. Many of these collisions resulted in rear ends

2. Usually the default primary collision for rear ends with police department ii. Input from fire department

1. Priorities
a. Road widths
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS002 / 11215289 2
b. Ability to get around obstacles (mountable curbs, etc.) c. Traffic calming devices
d. Roads in high fire hazard severity zones
i. To evacuate during a wildfire event

2. City does not currently have a largescale evacuation plan a. In progress

3. Heatmap of collisions
a. Look into collision density in relation to collision rates b. Public website engagement
i. Summarized interactive map comments

1. ACID canal request for multi-use paths are known to the City a. Difficult to do since it is different agency

2. Magnolia neighborhood has come up in recent conversations a. City has had requests for more projects on west side of town

3. Congestion at E Cypress Ave at I-5 ramps
a. Difficult intersection
b. Timed recently
c. Would benefit from a 2nd northbound lane on on-ramp
d. Proposal was previously considered along corridor for signage/striping

4. Crossing for pedestrians Buenaventura at Lakeside
a. In safety lighting project
b. Nothing specific to pedestrian crossings

5. Traffic circles on Shasta St
a. Many questions when they first went in
b. Potentially related to student drivers
i. High school is in close proximity

6. Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam has design for traffic signal a. Been looking at funding to complete the project

7. Sidewalks near Hartnell and Alta Mesa
a. Big project to connect discontinuous sidewalks at pinch point ii. Summarized survey results

1. Primary safety concern from public was a lack of infrastructure

2. Residents preferred shared use paths for bicyclists

3. Most people were familiar with ATP and HSIP projects and wanted to learn more
a. Have mailing list from people who responded
i. Can reach out to people who wanted more information

4. Most people might be willing to use alternate modes of travel iii. Other comments from the public

1. Concern about safety along Palisades Ave

2. No current plans to make improvements

3. Many people spend time at trailhead

4. Was sometimes confused with on-ramp to I-5

5. Seems to be a few specific drivers that frequent this area c. Safety projects in the City
i. HSIP Cycle 10 projects
ii. ATP Cycle 5 projects

1. Will likely be constructed around 2024-2026

2. Design will start this year
iii. South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail Project Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS002 / 11215289 3

1. Could potentially add pedestrian fencing along roadway or additional enforcement
a. Between bridge and casino entrance

4. Safety Projects
a. Methodology
b. Priority locations
c. Recommended countermeasures
i. Priority intersections

1. Most signal heads have been updated to 12”

2. Most pedestrian signals have countdown timers
a. Working through incrementally to get these replaced

3. City has advance dilemma zone for high-speed approaches

4. Decision was previously made by the City to not install retroreflective tape
a. City runs on its own power

5. Consider alternate routes as a countermeasure
a. Sometimes the improvements can funnel active transportation in areas that are not as desirable as alternate routes
b. Can view data for bike/pedestrian routes in the City c. SRAT hired a travel data collection company
i. Around 30 active transportation video counts around the City
ii. Under contract to do these counts in intervals in the next few years
ii. Priority segments

1. Bechelli Ln has ATP project to add bike lanes and reduce area for vehicles
a. Around 1 more year until construction
b. From Cypress to S Bonnyview Rd

2. Hartnell Avenue curvature
a. Considered HSIP project but couldn’t find one that would be competitive
b. Might be good bike corridor
i. Parallels SR 44 and connects to development
d. Potential funding sources for projects
i. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

1. Benefit-to-cost ratio projects

2. Set-aside funding
ii. Active Transportation Program (ATP)
e. Non-engineering safety projects
i. Education

1. Agencies to partner with
a. Information Gatekeepers, Shasta Living Streets, Public Health Department
ii. Emerging Technologies

1. Automatic bicycle/pedestrian counters
a. City has current vehicle counters from decades ago but not utilized often
iii. Enforcement
iv. Emergency Response
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application LRSPMS002 / 11215289 4

1. Speed tables don’t dramatically affect response times and are not as harsh on equipment

5. LRSP Timeframe
a. Living document that is updated as needed
b. Official update every 5 years
c. LRSP schedule for completion
i. Final LRSP around June/July 2021

6. Next Steps
a. Provide input on vision, mission, and goals
b. Dan will provide shapefile of areas with disadvantaged communities to overlay over areas with recent/upcoming/proposed projects
c. Continue to share the LRSP website with the public
d. Review of draft LRSP document
List of Attendees

1. Shelby Nadin – Associate Engineer, City of Redding

2. John Abshier – Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Redding

3. Craig Wittner – Fire Marshal, Redding Fire Department

4. Jesse Solorio – Traffic Operations Engineer, Caltrans

5. Robert Fellinger – Chief Business Official, Redding Unified School District

6. Sara Sundquist – Healthy Shasta Coordinator, Healthy Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and Human Services

7. Michael Kuker – Associate Transportation Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

8. Dan Wayne – Senior Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

9. Kathy Kleinschmidt – GHD

10. Emily Darke – GHD
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Interactive Map Comments
ID Created on Type Comment Response to Comment
1 3/26/2021 9:13 Biking Comment
Bridge shoulders need to be swept more frequently and thoroughly. Also, the fog line has worn away almost completely. It would be easy to restripe and maybe even add bike lane buffers This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 2 3/26/2021 9:14 Driving Comment Congestion occurs during peak periods. Recommend installing a roundabout Related to congestion at the intersection of Hartnell Ave at Alta Mesa Dr. 3 3/26/2021 9:15 Driving Comment Congestion occurs during peak periods. Recommend installing a roundabout Related to congestion at the intersection of Old Alturas Rd at Victor Ave.4 3/26/2021 9:18 Driving Comment The (arguably) worst congestion in Redding occurs near the I-5/Cypress Ave interchange. Are there any long-term improvements planned? Related to congestion at the US 101 interchange at Cypress Ave.5 3/26/2021 11:44 Biking Comment This area would be idea for a multiuse path. There are many families who live in Stillwater Heights that attend Columbia School (and would like to go to the Big League).

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 6 3/26/2021 11:45 Pedestrian Comment Improve access to EHS for residents through back of school to avoid traffic at front of school. Related to traffic flow near Enterprise High School.7 3/26/2021 11:50 Biking Comment Difficult for bikes to trigger signal and cross Market esp heading eastbound. Signal does not have a protected left. Consider adding sign/sharrow or other improvements for bikes heading westbound up CA street hill.

Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at California St). 8 3/26/2021 11:52 Biking Comment a path through this area would be idea to get people from Magnolia neighborhood over to Airpark/Gold to head to hospital area and downtown. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.9 3/26/2021 11:55 Biking Comment Signalized crossing of some sort would help bikes, peds, drivers and school traffic. This area preferred over Sunset Terrace for signal as this area lacks site distance, has high speeds, and trail access is close (trail to Manzanita) and River Trail on south side of 299. Could be a great connection for a great deal of students (Shasta, Pioneer, Uprep, Manzanita, Coop...) Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 299 at Overhill Dr). 10 3/26/2021 11:57 Pedestrian Comment
Unsafe to cross with high speeds, multiple lanes esp peak traffic hours. Lots of school time traffic. Many residents (along Buenaventura and Lakeside subdivision) like to walk/bike to Mary Lake and Westside trails. many drive as they do not feel safe driving. One of my neighbors moved to Mary Lake because he didn't like crossing Buenaventura for his daily morning walks.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 11 3/26/2021 11:58 Biking Comment Lots of gravel in Bike Lane due to buffered bike lane. Needs to be swept to curb on a more frequent basis. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.12 3/26/2021 12:00 Pedestrian Comment Well defined goat path here. Residents living off Starlight walk/bike to market. Would be nice to define this multiuse path (lots of goat heads as a goat path!) No good for bikes (rocky and goat heads).

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 13 3/26/2021 12:03 Biking Comment
K rail is put in odd spots for bikes to enter/exit roadway block to eliminate cut through traffic. It's also poorly maintained and feels unsafe. I don't think it is unsafe, it feels unsafe and could be improved through art, paint, landscaping to make this an incredible bike way with low traffic. Low hanging fruit, good neighborhood/Juniper School project! This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 14 3/26/2021 12:06 Biking Comment ACID Canal would make an amazing bike path for N/S commuters and kids going to school (Sequoia, Cypress, Bonney View, Sycamore - and schools in Anderson) This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.15 3/26/2021 12:08 Driving Comment Intersection is huge. Difficult for all users. Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at S Bonnyview Rd).16 3/26/2021 12:09 Biking Comment High Speeds for regular bike lane. Needs multiuse path or alternative route for cyclists. Will get busier when Costco comes. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.17 3/30/2021 7:26 Biking Comment It would be nice to see more frequent maintenance of the eastbound bike lane, the roadside vegetation encroaches into the lane reducing the usable width for cyclists. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.18 3/30/2021 7:38 Biking Comment The westbound bike lane on South Bonnyview ends at Eastside Road. It would be nice to have bike facilities continue on South Bonnyview to Cedars Road. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.

Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP ID Created on Type Comment Response to Comment
19 3/30/2021 7:40 Biking Comment There is a Bike Route sign on Cedars at Westside Road. It would be nice to link this bike route with the bike lanes on South Bonnyview Road This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.20 3/30/2021 7:41 Biking Comment This is a challenging Intersection for westbound cyclists Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at S Bonnyview Rd).21 3/30/2021 15:40 Biking Comment No bike lane or pedestrian walkway advailable. Please develop such a path on this stretch of road. Unsafe road for bicyclists and pedestrians. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.22 4/12/2021 14:06 Driving Comment Generally a confusing intersection - sensors don't get tripped, road gets blocked, cars turn on red at wrong time. I do not know what needs to be done to fix this intersection, but I know it's an extremely frustrating and potentially dangerous one.

Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at Breslauer Way). 23 4/16/2021 22:54 Driving Comment
It's not that I do not appreciate having traffic circles in my neighborhood. It is that others are unaware of the right of way in a traffic circle. So many times I've had to slam on my brakes as I'm making a left turn already in the intersection as someone tries to beat me to go straight through the intersection. Too many close calls to count. If the city was able to inform/educate the public 0 maybe there won't be so many incidents in these areas.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 24 4/17/2021 10:43 Driving Comment I have seen too many close calls at this intersection. There needs to be traffic lights here. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.25 4/28/2021 16:09 Pedestrian Comment This area really needs a sidewalk, or at the very least grade it and make it easier for people to walk, push a baby carriage or use a wheel chair. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.26 4/28/2021 17:53 Pedestrian Comment Need sidewalks on this street and bike lanes as well. Very unsafe. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.27 4/29/2021 7:23 Driving Comment Very foolish to close this major street. During the Carr fire, it was a vitally important escape route. Hard to figure out why this shortsighted decision was made.

How should the response to the clossure of Riverside Dr be phrased? 28 4/29/2021 17:26 Driving Comment
Cars turning left onto Rancho Rd have very fast traffic coming around a blind curve from Churn Creek Rd. Have witnessed many close calls. Anyone unfamiliar with the road and the traffic is greatly at risk of a serious injury accident at this intersection as well as those who are familiar as well.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 29 4/30/2021 8:13 Driving Comment Congested intersection due to commuter traffic and pedestrian traffic. Traffic light skips Airpark Dr. frequently. Related to congestion at the intersection of Placer St at Airpark Dr. 30 5/7/2021 16:25 Driving Comment Lanes seem too narrow for most cars. I have witnessed so many drivers driving over the white lines because they look too close to other vehicles. The area around the E Cypress Ave bridge has been identified as a priority location in the Local Road Safety Plan. Countermeasures for this location are presented in the plan.31 5/8/2021 8:39 Driving Comment Too much drag racing and speeding done on Goodwater Ave, endangers children walking & waiting at the numerous bus stops for elementary and high school students and pedestrians on walks or bike rides with children. One house on this road fence was damaged from car racing. Recommend several speed bumps be placed to discourage speeding and racing vehicles. Including Freeman Way which has the same problems and many families.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 32 5/14/2021 21:38 Driving Comment
Freebridge at Smile is desperately in need of a STOP Sign. Either a 4 Way stop or Stop signes on Freebridge Entering Freebridge from Russel to Smile making a left or a right turn is dangerous and has blind spots of seeing traffic coming at a high rate of speed from the south on Freebridge and also from Parkview heading South on Freebridge.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 33 5/14/2021 21:43 Driving Comment
Turning from Eureka way, left onto Almond at night is confusing and dangerous because there is no street light. This is exacerbated by the lights of East bound traffic on Eureka way.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.

Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP ID Created on Type Comment Response to Comment
34 5/17/2021 9:39 Biking Comment
Old Alturas Bridge lacks proper bike lanes requiring bikes and cars to share the lane. Traffic travels at high speeds in this corridor. This narrow bridge is my biggest safety concern when biking to and from work (Shasta View to Downtown). Replacing the bridge and providing adequate facilities would be a huge improvement. Better yet, would be a multi-use path on the north side of Old Alturas from Shasta View Drive to Browning Street.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 35 5/17/2021 12:59 Driving Comment Lots of congestion on Shasta View between 44 and Hartnell. Road should be widened with bike lanes and sidewalk improvements. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 36 5/17/2021 12:59 Driving Comment Lots of congestion on Victor between 44 and Cypress. Road should be widened with bike lanes and sidewalk improvements. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.37 5/17/2021 13:01 Driving Comment Double signal at Mistletoe and 44, always causes backups. Recommend installing very large roundabout to cover the close intersection of all the roads. Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 44 at Mistletoe Ln).38 5/17/2021 13:03 Driving Comment Left turn onto Airport Road or left turn onto 44 westbound ramp can be difficult during peak traffic times. Consider intersection improvements such as a roundabout.

Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 44 at Airport Rd). 39 6/17/2021 15:11 Driving Comment
When trying to turn left here onto Gold, it's often difficult to judge whether or not a car will be going straight onto California or turning left onto Gold. It would be great if there was a definitive way to tell the difference.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 40 6/17/2021 15:13 Driving Comment
Twice in the past 2 weeks I've been in the far right lane to turn right and had another car to the right of me use the bike lane. Typically this means they are parking, but two separate drivers appear to have been confused and then tried to get into the lane I was in.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 41 6/17/2021 15:14 Driving Comment It would be great if the stop signs here became permanent. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.42 6/17/2021 16:47 Pedestrian Comment This section of Old Alturas is dangerous for pedestrians and bikers. The bridge is too narrow as well as the shoulders on both sides of the street. Intersection of Old Alturas and Victor begs for a roundabout.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 43 6/18/2021 6:58 Biking Comment Bike lanes don't continue to Rancho Road. Plenty of room to add white lines. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 44 6/18/2021 7:01 Biking Comment
This stretch of road has very small shoulder. It would be great if road could be expanded in this stretch from Victor to I5 so I could ride to work and the grocery store.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.

Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP Appendix
C– Previous
Safety Plans and Projects
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application 9 2
1 8
12 17
13 10
3 11
18 14
13 16
5 5
15 5
6 6
6 6
6 6
7 6
5 7
6 6
6 7
6 6
6 7
7 6
7 7
6 7
6 4
6 6
7 FIGURE C.1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 03/11/2021
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\Upcoming Safety Projects.mxd Print date: 11 Mar 2021 - 15:18
Legend
Project Type
ATP, Cycle 1
ATP, Cycle 2
ATP, Cycle 3
ATP, Cycle 5
HSIP, Cycle 6
HSIP, Cycle 7
HSIP, Cycle 8
HSIP, Cycle 9
HSIP, Cycle 10

ASHC/STI
Section 130
City CIP
City of Redding
City Limit

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

CURRENT/UPCOMING SAFETY

PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF REDDING

CITY OF

REDDING
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A) Safety Projects in Progress/Recently Completed in the City of Redding City Roadways
Prj ID Project Funding Year Progress Name Location Improvements 1 ATP, Cycle 3 May-20 In design West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project
West St, 7th St, 8th St, 9th St, 10th St,
Magnolia Ave
Curb and gutter improvements, curb bulb-outs, pedestrian improvements, installing RRFB, adding bicycle markings, buffered bike lane, installing lighting
2 HSIP, Cycle 6 Oct-18 In design Old Oregon Trail Widening Old Oregon Trail from Paso Robles Ave to Bear Mountain Rd Widening roadway
3 ASHC/STI Nov-20 In design Trinity Street Bikeway Project Trinity St, S on Continental St, E on Butte St Installing buffered cycle track, installing green conflict paint 4 Section 130 Jun-20 Construction
this year
Shasta Street R.R. Crossing
Improvements Project Shasta St at Railroad Crossing Pedestrian improvements at railroad crossing 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project Court St (Shasta St to Butte St) Micro-surfacing, striping improvements 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project South St (Railroad Crossing to SR 273) Striping improvements, ADA curb return upgrades, micro-surfacing 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project Placer St (Market St to Continental St) Microsurfacing, striping improvements, ADA curb return upgrades 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project Butte St at Continental St Micro-surfacing, striping improvements, installation of new traffic signal pole and mast arm, ADA curb return upgrade
6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Beltline Rd at Mountain Lakes Blvd Install new intersection lighting on Beltline Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Lake Blvd at Wilmington Way Install new intersection lighting on Lake Blvd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam Rd Install new intersection lighting on Keswick Dam Rd and Lake Blvd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Lake Blvd at Magnums Way Install new intersection lighting on Magnums Way 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Buenaventura Blvd at Lakeside Dr Install new intersection lighting on Buenaventura Blvd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Hilltop Dr at Industrial St Install new intersection lighting on Hilltop Dr and Industrial St 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Churn Creek Rd at Harpole Rd Install new intersection lighting on Churn Creek Rd and Harpole Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Christian Ave Install new intersection lighting on Shasta View Dr and Christian Ave
6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Wilson Ave Install new intersection lighting on 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Hawn Ave Install new intersection lighting on Shasta View Dr at Hawn Ave 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Alden Ave Install new intersection lighting on Alden Ave at Shasta View Dr 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Galaxy Way Install new intersection lighting on Galaxy Way 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Alta Mesa Dr Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd and Alta Mesa Dr 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Alta Camino Dr Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Alta Rico Rd Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd at Alta Rico Dr 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Saratoga Dr Install new intersection lighting on Saratoga Dr and Rancho Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Goodwater Ave Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd and Goodwater Ave 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Persistence Ln Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd and Persistence Ln 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Placer St at West St New striping and crosswalk markings, ADA upgrades, RRFBs, advance warning signage 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Gold St at Court St New striping and crosswalk markings, detectable warning surface upgrades, RRFBs, refuge island/concrete median 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Parkview Ave at State St ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, refuge island/concrete median
7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Hilltop Dr at Sandpoint Dr ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Churn Creek St at Palacio Dr ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Browning St at Lancers Ln ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, new lighting 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Old Alturas Rd at Bradford Way
New striping and crosswalk markings, detectable warning surface upgrades, RRFBs, ADA upgrades, refuge island/concrete median, new lighting, advance warning signage
7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Churn Creek Rd at Michael Ln ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, new lighting 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Saturn Skyway at Shasta View Dr
New striping and crosswalk markings, detectable warning surface upgrades, RRFBs, ADA upgrades, refuge island/concrete median, advance warning signage
8 City CIP Apr-19 Constructed Airport Road Improvement Project Airport Rd (Billy Jean Ln to Electro Way) Road widening 9 ATP, Cycle 3 Jun-16 In design Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements Bechelli Ln, Loma Vista Ave
Construction of a mix of buffered bike lanes, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing beacons, pedestrian refuge islands, pedestrian safety amenities including safety lighting, and functional landscaping including shade trees and buffers from traffic. 10 HSIP, Cycle 7 Mar-20 In
construction
Hartnell Avenue Safety
Improvement Project
Hartnell Ave from Churn Creek Rd to
East Way
Striping improvements, ADA upgrades, lighting improvements.

Install raised median.
11 ATP, Cycle 2 Jun-20 Construction
this year
Diestelhort to Downtown NonMotorized Improvement Diestelhort to Downtown Signage and striping improvements, install RRFBs, buffered bike lanes,
12 ATP, Cycle 1 May-15 Completed Placer Street Improvements Placer St (S of Boston Ave to Mesa St) Sidewalk and curb improvements, signage and striping improvements, signal modifications
13 ATP, Cycle 2 Jan-18 Completed Quartz Hill Road Improvements Quartz Hill Rd (S of Terra Nova St to Brenton Dr) Road widening, pedestrian crossing improvements Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Prj ID Project Funding Year Progress Name Location Improvements 13 ATP, Cycle 2 Jan-18 Completed Quartz Hill Road Improvements Quartz Hill Rd (W of Delta St to SR 273) Pedestrian crossing improvements 14 HSIP, Cycle 8 Sep-20 Construction
this year
Churn Creek Rd & Maraglia St
Safety Improvements
Churn Creek (E Cypress to Hartnell),
Maraglia
Curb ramp improvements, additional lighting, striping
improvements
15 ASHC/STI Dec-18
In design but
applied for
more $
California Street Bikeway California St (Eureka Way to Yuba St) Construction of two-way Class IV bikeway and pedestrian access improvements along California Street, between Division Street and Yuba Street.
16 ATP, Cycle 5 Jul-20 Funded Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project Turtle Bay
Buffered 2-way cycle track; shared use path; raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards, lane reductions; raised crosswalks with bike/ped separations; and shade trees.
17 ATP, Cycle 5 Jul-20 Funded Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation
Victor Ave (s/o Hartnell Ave to Cypress
Ave), Cypress Ave (Victor Ave to Alfreda
Way), Alfreda Way (Cypress Ave to Del
Monte St)
Along Victor Ave, Cypress Ave, and Alfreda Way, construct shared use paths, sidewalks, curb/gutter/curb ramps, bike lanes, and protected intersections.
18 Section 130 Oct-20 Construction
this year
Girvan Road Railroad Crossing
Improvements and South Redding
Bikeway Pedestrian Trail Project
SR 273, Westside Rd, Girvan Rd,
Eastside Rd Bicycle and pedestrian crossing improvements Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Appendix D – Recommended
Projects
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Priority Intersection Characteristics
Intersection
EPDO
Total Crashes
Crash Rate
Intersection Type
Top Type of Collision
(Number of Collisions)
Top Violation Category
(Number of Collisions)
Night
Wet
Ped
Bike
Involv. w/Fixed Object
Crosing Not in
Crosswalk
DUI
Churn Creek Rd / Hartnell Ave 1223 32 0.4265 Signalized Rear End (21) Unsafe Speed (13) 13 4 2 1 1 0 7 South St / California St 588 10 - Signalized Broadside (6) Traffic Signals and Signs (5) 2121101
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli Ln 587 9 0.1613 Signalized Hit Object (4) Unsafe Speed
(2)/Other Than Driver
(or Pedestrian) (2)
3121311
Airport Rd / Preserve Blvd 562 4 0.1809 Signalized Rear End (2)/ Broadside (2) N/A (all unique) 2001001
Butte St / Continental St 562 4 0.2300 Signalized N/A (all unique)
Other Hazardous
Violation (2) 0012000
Market St / Riverside Dr 551 3 - Signalized N/A (all
unique) N/A (all unique) 2110111
Hartnell Ave / Northwoods Way 544 1 0.0363 Signalized Broadside (1) DUI/BUI (1) 1100001 Churn Creek Rd / E Cypress Ave 169 29 0.4752 Signalized Broadside (12) Traffic Signals and Signs (7) 10 1 1 1 2 0 5
Victor Ave / Hartnell Ave 151 22 0.3742 Signalized Rear End (10) Unsafe Speed (7) 13 12 2 2 1 1 6 Hilltop Dr / E Cypress Ave 127 22 0.3174 Signalized Rear End (11) Unsafe Speed (10) 9401305 E Cypress Ave / Bechelli Ln 85 20 0.2977 Signalized Rear End (10) Unsafe Speed (9) 3311102 Priority Segment Characteristics
Road Name
EPDO
Total Crashes
Crash Rate
Length
Top Type of Collision
(Number of Collisions)
Top Violation Category
(Number of Collisions)
Night
Wet
Ped
Crossing Not in
Crosswalk
Bike
Involv. w/Fixed Object
DUI
Churn Creek Rd (Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd) 1021 73 0.5606 3.11 Broadside (21) Automobile Right of Way (21) 23 9 5 2 5 18 13
E Cypress Ave (Park Marina Dr to
Churn Creek Rd) 876 51 0.7648 1.12 Broadside (24) Automobile Right of Way (17) 10 8 4 2 5 4 4
Hilltop Dr (n/o Browning St to
Maraglia St) 835 45 0.4574 1.86 Broadside (12) Automobile Right of Way (11) 15 7 5 4 3 13 15
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress Ave to n/o
3rd St) 711 29 1.5918 0.84 Broadside (14) Automobile Right of Way (7) 6111423
W Cypress Ave (Market St to Park
Marina Dr) 657 15 0.5404 0.72
Hit Object
(4)/Vehicle
Pedestrian (4)
Unsafe Speed (4) 6342244
Railroad Ave (South St to
Buenaventura Blvd) 651 10 0.3758 1.8 Broadside (3) N/A (all unique) 4121021 Hartnell Ave (Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd) 618 7 - 0.87 Hit Object (3) DUI/BUI (5) 4100055 Hilltop Dr (North of Hilltop Dr to
St Thomas Pkwy) 604 11 0.6606 0.65 Broadside (5) Automobile Right of Way (3) 5011112
Hartnell Ave (Northwoods Way to
Kenco Ave) 193 30 0.8571 0.94 Broadside (11) Automobile Right of Way (10) 9664244
S Bonnyview Rd (S Market St to
Churn Creek Rd) 163 25 0.2074 2.01 Hit Object (8) Unsafe Speed (8) 7 4 0 0 3 10 7 Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Priority Intersection Mitigations
Intersection Focus Area
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures Reasoning
Impaired Driving - - Increase DUI enforcement 7 DUI collisions.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
21 rear end and 4 broadside collsions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Churn Creek Rd.
- - Consolidate driveways Multiple driveways in close proximity to intersection.

Pedestrians S21PB 60% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
2 pedestrian collisions. At commercial
district and near Mr Shasta Mall.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
6 broadside collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation) Located in downtown.

S06 55% Install left-turn lane and add turn phase
6 broadside collisions. No current left
turn lane or phase on north leg of
California St.

Pedestrians S21PB 60% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
2 pedestrian collisions. Located in
downtown.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
2 rear end collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Hartnell Ave.

S04 40% Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone
Detection
2 rear end collisons. Nearest
intersection is around 0.5mi away.

Pedestrians S13PB 35% Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
2 pedestrian collisions. Fatal pedestrian
collision due to the pedestrian entering
traffic, not in a crosswalk.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
2 rear end and 2 broadside collisions.

S04 40% Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone
Detection
2 rear end and 2 broadside collisions. In
rural area. Nearest signalized
intersection around 1 mi away.

S20PB 15% Install advance stop bar before
crosswalk (Bicycle Box)
2 bicycle collisions. No bike
accomodations at intersection.
-- Bicycle education about riding at night
and rules of the road
2 bicycle collisions. Fatal collision was at
night from bike improperly turning west
while vehicle was proceeding south.

Butte St /
Continental St - --
Pedestrians S18PB 25% Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) 1 fatal pedestrian collision due to
pedestrian crossing not at crosswalk. No
pedestrian crossing on north leg.

Intersections S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
1 fatal broadside collision.

Impaired Driving - - Increase DUI enforcement 1 fatal collision due to DUI.

Intersections
Intersections
Intersections
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
Market St /
Riverside Dr
Intersections
None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) Bicyclists
South St /
California St
Airport Rd /
Preserve Blvd
Hartnell Ave /
Bechelli Ln
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Intersection Focus Area
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures Reasoning
S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
12 broadside and 6 rear end collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Churn Creek Rd. 3 study
intersections and 3 study segments on
Cypress Ave.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
10 rear end and 5 broadside collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Hartnell Ave.

Pedestrians S21PB 60% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 2 pedestrian collisions.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
11 rear end and 3 broadside collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Churn Creek Rd. 3 study
intersections and 3 study segments on
Cypress Ave.

S09 10% Install raised pavement markers and
striping (Through Intersection)
9 night and 4 wet roadway collisions. All
approaches have multiple left-turn
lanes.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
10 rear end and 2 broadside collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Churn Creek Rd. 3 study
intersections and 3 study segments on
Cypress Ave.

E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln Intersections
Hilltop Dr / E
Cypress Ave
Intersections
Intersections
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave
Victor Ave /
Hartnell Ave
Intersections
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application City Segment Mitigations
Segment Focus Area
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures Reasoning
- R26 30% Install dynamic/variable speed warning
signs 10 unsafe speed violations.

Bicyclists - - Install bike conflict paint at
intersections and driveways 5 bike collisions, 4 were broadside.

R01 35% Add segment lighting (East of I-5
Interchange) 10 night collisions.
-- Consolidate existing driveways to limit
the number of access points
24 broadside collisions. 8 improper turning
and 17 automobile right-of-way violations.

High density of driveways along corridor.

R08 25% Install raised median (Between Hilltop
Dr and Churn Creek Rd)
4 head on collisions. 8 improper turning and
17 automobile right-of-way violations.

R32PB/
R33PB
35%/
45%
Install bike lanes/Install separated bike
lanes
5 bike collisions. No consistent bike facilities
along the corridor.
-- Install bike conflict paint at
intersections and driveways
5 bike collisions. High density of driveways
along corridor.

R08 25% Install raised median (Between Dana
Dr and Browning Dr) 1 head on collision.

R27 15% Install delineators, reflectors and/or
object markers 13 fixed-object collisions.

R28 25%
Install edge-lines and centerlines
(between Ross/Big-Lots Driveway and
Margalia St)
No existing lane markings.

Pedestrians - -
Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk to
guide pedestrians to the enhanced
crosswalk with RRFB
5 pedestrian collisions.

R08 25% Install raised median (on the
approaches to Hartnell Ave) 4 head on collsions.
-- Consolidate existing driveways to limit
the number of access points
14 broadside collisions. 6 improper turning
and 7 automobile right-of-way collisions.
- R26 30% Install dynamic/variable speed warning
signs 4 unsafe speed collisions.

Pedestrians R35PB 35% Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) 5 pedestrian collisions.

Pedestrians,
Bicyclists --
Install multiuse path/ sharrow on
eastbound approach to the intersection
of W Cypress Ave/ Market St
5 pedestrian and 2 bicycle collisions
Bicyclists - - Install bike conflict paint at
intersections and driveways 2 bicycle collisions.

R23 40% Install chevron signs on horizontal
curves
2 hit object collisions. Many several sharp
curves at end of segment.

R26 30% Install dynamic/variable speed warning
signs
2 hit object collisions. Many several sharp
curves at end of segment.

R27 15% Install delineators, reflectors, and/or
object markers
2 hit object collisions. Many several sharp
curves at end of segment.

Pedestrians R34PB 80% Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway)
2 pedestrian collisions (1 fatal) on southern
end of segment.
-
Bicyclists
-
-
-
Churn Creek Rd
(Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd)
E Cypress Ave (Park
Marina Dr to Churn
Creek Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o
Browning St to
Maraglia St)
W Cypress Ave
(Market St to Park
Marina Dr)
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress
Ave to n/o 3rd St)
Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd)
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Segment Focus Area
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures Reasoning
R01 35% Add Segment Lighting 4 collisions at night.

R24 25% Install curve advance warning signs 5 hit object collisions. Several sharp curves.

Impaired
Driving
- - Increase DUI enforcement 5 collisions with alcohol involved.

R01 35% Add Segment Lighting 5 collisions at night. Limited lighting on northbound lanes.
-- Consolidate existing driveways to limit
the number of access points
5 broadside collisions and 3 automobile right
of way violations.

Bicyclists R14 30%
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4
to 3 and add a two way left-turn and
bike lanes)1
5 broadside collisions, 3 automobile right of
way violations, and 1 bicyclist collision.

Vehicles turning left onto roadway from
driveways currently need to cross 2 lanes of
traffic. Area with high density housing.

Pedestrians,
Bicyclists R35PB 35%
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at
uncontrolled locations (with enhanced
safety features)
1 pedestrian and 1 bicycle collision near
Ridgetop Drive.

Hartnell Ave
(Northwoods Way to
Kenco Ave)
- --
S Bonnyview Rd (S
Market St to Churn
Creek Rd)
Bicyclists,
Pedestrians R33PB 45% Install Separated Bike Lanes 3 bike collisions. Several public comments to increase bicycle safety on this segment. 1 Traffic volumes in the segment must be evaluated to ensure that the road diet would sustain current and future traffic None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) -
-
Hilltop Dr (North of
Hilltop Dr to St
Thomas Pkwy)
Hartnell Ave
(Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd)
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Locations for Proposed Leading Pedestrian Interval Project Fatal Severe
Injury
Other Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain PDO
Lake Blvd Hiatt Dr - - - - -
Lake Blvd Oasis Rd 0 0 0 0 0
Lake Blvd Tamarack Dr 0 0 1 0 0
Lake Blvd Clay St 0 0 0 0 0
Lake Blvd North Point Dr 0 1 0 0 0
Lake Blvd Masonic Ave 0 0 0 2 0
Hilltop Dr Peppertree Ln 0 0 0 0 0
Placer St Pleasant St - - - - -
Court St Tehama St 0 0 2 0 0
Court St Shasta St 0 0 2 0 0
Court St Placer St 0 0 1 2 0
Court St South St 0 0 0 0 0
Placer St Airpark Dr / Fig Ave - - - - -
Buenaventura Blvd Placer St 0 0 0 0 0
Butte St Continental St 1 0 1 1 0
Placer St Continental St 0 1 1 0 0
Placer St East St 0 0 0 0 0
Cypress Ave Civic Center Dr 0 0 0 1 0
Athens Ave Locust St 0 0 1 0 0
Hartnell Ave Cobblestone - - - - -
Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave 0 0 0 1 0
Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln 1 0 1 1 0
Bechelli Ln Blue Shield - - - - -
S Bonnyview Rd Fire Hall 4 - - - - -
E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way 0 0 0 1 0
Churn Creek Rd Old Alturas Rd 0 0 1 1 0
Churn Creek Rd Presidio St 0 0 0 2 0
Churn Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln 0 0 0 1 0
Churn Creek Rd Industrial St 0 0 0 0 0
Churn Creek Rd Merchant St 0 0 1 0 0
Hartnell Ave Northwoods Way 0 0 0 0 0
Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln 0 0 0 0 0
Churn Creek Rd Loma Vista Dr 0 0 0 0 0
Shasta View Dr Hartnell Ave 0 0 0 0 0
Dana Dr Victor Ave 0 0 0 0 0
Dana Dr Bradford Way 0 0 0 0 0
Victor Ave E Cypress Ave 0 0 0 0 0
Old Alturas Rd Friendly Rd 0 0 0 0 0
Airport Rd Knighton Rd 0 0 0 0 0
Shasta View Dr Hemingway St - - - - -
Shasta View Dr Tarmac Rd - - - - -
Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr 0 0 0 0 0
Airport Rd Rancho Rd 0 0 0 0 0
Airport Rd Preserve Blvd 1 0 0 0 0
Airport Rd Shasta View Dr - - - - -
Total 3 2 12 13 0
Primary Road Secondary Road
Bike+Ped Collisions
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: LRSP_2026 Amended Draft (with Appendices) (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application Packet Pg. 397
Attachment: NOE LRSP_2026 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Grant Application SS4A)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize staff to submit a United States Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Program application in an amount not-to-exceed $15 million for the design and construction of a roundabout and related curve-safety improvements at the intersection of Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road; and (2) Authorize commitment of up to 20 percent in City of Redding Public Works’ Traffic Impact Fee funds, which may be satisfied through a combination of, in-kind services, or other eligible local sources.

Fiscal Impact
If awarded, the City of Redding (City) could receive up to $15 million in federal implementation funding under the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Program. The program requires a 20 percent local match, equating to a local funding commitment of approximately $3 million. This local match may be fulfilled through the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program since this project is on the TIF eligibility list and is a high priority for the City.

By securing this implementation grant, the City would significantly offset the total projected project cost - estimated to exceed $15 million - with the potential to leverage additional resources and reduce long-term infrastructure liabilities through federal investment.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize an SS4A Program grant application; in that case, the City would not be considered for an award and the Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho Intersection Project (Project) would remain on the action plan until other funding sources are identified.

MEETING DATE: June 17, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Program.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11 e Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the US Department of Transportation 6.17.25 (4.11(e)-- Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Grant Application - US Dept of Transportation Safe Streets & Roads For All Program Page 2
Background/Analysis
The SS4A grant program was established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to support regional, local, and tribal efforts to prevent roadway fatalities and serious injuries. Administered by the U.S. DOT, the program offers $5 billion in competitive funding over five years (FY 2022–2026), with approximately $1.26 billion available in FY 2024.

The SS4A program offers two types of grants:

1. Action Plan Grants – To develop or update comprehensive safety action plans. ($300,000 grant obtained in 2024)

2. Implementation Grants – To carry out strategies and projects identified in eligible action plans.

The City is currently working to update the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), as part of an Action Plan Grant recently received from this program. The update to the LRSP will help to satisfy the eligibility requirement for an implementation grant. The Churn Creek/Victor/Rancho intersection is a critical safety concern, with documented collision history and substandard geometry contributing to higher-than-average crash rates. The proposed project includes:
• Reconstructing the existing non-signalized intersection into a modern roundabout to improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points;
• Realigning and softening dangerous horizontal curves on all approaches to improve driver sight distance and maneuverability;
• Installing enhanced pedestrian and bicycle crossing features to improve multimodal safety; and
• Implementing new signage, lighting, and drainage infrastructure.

This level of readiness enhances the competitiveness of the project under SS4A criteria, which prioritizes projects with demonstrated safety benefits, strong planning foundations, and near-term implementation potential.

According to Federal Highway Administration research, roundabouts can reduce injury crashes by 75 percent and fatal crashes by over 90 percent compared to traditional intersections. The City’s project aligns with SS4A’s core emphasis on systemic safety improvements, speed management, and context-sensitive design.

Environmental Review
This action, authorizing submission of a grant application, is not a project as defined by CEQA, and no further action is necessary. If a grant is awarded and accepted by Council, any projects utilizing the grant funding will be subject to review under CEQA.

Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11 e Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the US Department of Transportation 6.17.25 (4.11(e)-- Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Grant Application - US Dept of Transportation Safe Streets & Roads For All Program Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Location Map
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11 e Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the US Department of Transportation 6.17.25 (4.11(e)--

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

EXHIBIT A

CHURN CREEK RD, VICTOR AVE &

RANCHO RD ROUNDABOUT PROJECT PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

EL VERANO ST FIDDLENECK DR AMANDA DR

FILAREE DR

DAPPLE GRAY DR ALTA SAGA DR

LARIAT LN

PROJECT

LOCATION

RANCHO RD

VICTOR AVE
CHURN CREEK RD DEBBIE LN X:\Projects\ChrnCrkVictorRancho_Roundabout_2618\Design\Plans\Drawings\Location Map.dwg, Exhibit CC 8x11 Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11 e Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to the US Department of Transportation 6.17.25 (4.11(e)--

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP):
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the LRSP; and
(2) Find that the action is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies.

Fiscal Impact
An amount of $72,000 in state funds was allocated to the City of Redding (City) with a local match from Street Division funds of $8,000, to cover the cost of the LRSP.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to decline approval of the LRSP. This would jeopardize the award of future grant funds.

Background/Analysis
Each state maintains a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), which is a data-driven safety plan outlining measures to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries. The main components making up the SHSP are Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, also known as the five E’s. An LRSP similar to the SHSP is a means for local agencies to investigate and analyze traffic related safety needs and issues for local roads and present systemic solutions for potential implementation. Since 2009, the City has been successful in securing several federal grants through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) administered by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), including safety improvements to Victor Ave, Cypress Ave, Hartnell Ave, Churn Creek Road, and others. Due to a change in state policy, an approved LRSP is now a mandatory requirement for HSIP grant application eligibility.

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Approve Local Road Safety Plan
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Local Road Safety Plan Page 2
On November 19, 2019, the Council directed staff to apply for LRSP funding for the purpose of creating an LRSP. On February 4, 2020, the Council accepted grant funding from the State of California Local Roadway Safety Plan Program and staff hired GHD, Inc., to develop the LRSP.

In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group was formed with the City as the lead and individuals from local organizations representing the five E’s noted above including public safety agencies, engineers, school districts, County Health and Human Services, and planners. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and development of the safety plan.

Based on the collision data analysis and the stakeholder working group input, the LRSP includes a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Redding comprising of the current collision patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis). The goal of the LRSP is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City’s primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity, and to also address multiple SHSP challenge areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving. The nonengineering strategies were also developed through stakeholder engagement. The engineering countermeasures in the plan coincide with HSIP funding.

Staff has reviewed the action and determined that it is Statutorily Exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies, as the LRSP only involves planning studies for possible future actions the Council has not approved, adopted, or funded. Any future action would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA. Adoption of the plan would not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

The Resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.

Attachments
Resolution
Notice of Exemption (unfiled) (available online)
Draft Local Road Safety Plan (available online)
Local Road Safety Plan Appendices (available online)
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

TO APPROVE THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2020, the City Council accepted grant funding from the State of California Local Roadway Safety Plan Program to develop the Local Road Safety Plan; and WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan was created for the purpose of complying with new state and federal requirements related to the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP); and WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan includes a citywide analysis of the roadway system and identifies safety countermeasures to help mitigate primary crash trends and reduce the overall collision severity by addressing multiple challenge areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving; and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan is a requirement for future HSIP grant applications; and WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan has been developed through the coordinated efforts of City staff and consultants, stakeholder working group meetings, and input from the public; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby:

1. Determines that adoption of the 2021 Local Road Safety Plan is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Feasibility and Planning Studies exemption (14 CCR 15262), as the plan would not result in physical alteration of the environment and implementation of any future action would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA.

2. Approves the Local Road Safety Plan;
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
______________________________ ______________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Packet Pg. 405
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Street Address City State Zip Code
Redding Local Road Safety Plan | February 15, 2022

LOCAL ROAD

SAFETY PLAN
(LRSP)
City of Redding
Draft Report
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize This page was intentionally left blank.

Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.

City of Redding
Mayor and City Council
Public Works Department
Police Department
Fire Department
County of Shasta
Public Works Department
Health and Human Services
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Redding Unified School District
Healthy Shasta Partnership
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page ii

Furthermore, the Redding’s goal is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City’s primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity.

The 5 E’s of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies.

This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.

1. Pedestrians

2. Distracted Driving

3. Bicyclists

4. Intersections

5. Impaired Driving

6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding

Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page iii
Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations in the City. These locations, along with their proposed countermeasures, are shown in the tables below.

Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures

Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Systemic (49 locations) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Increase DUI enforcement
Consolidate driveways
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Bicycle education about riding at night and rules of the road Butte St / Continental
St
None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) Market St / Riverside
Dr Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.)
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Increase DUI enforcement
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli
Ln
South St / California St
Systemic (9 locations)
Victor Ave / Hartnell
Ave
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave
Airport Rd / Preserve
Blvd
E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress
Ave
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page iv
Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures
It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable (next cycle 11 is scheduled to open in April 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources to include
• Active Transportation Program (ATP)
o Next call for funding projects is scheduled to start in March 2022 • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program
• Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (Sustainable Communities) • Stimulus funding sources
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Add segment lighting (East of I-5 Interchange)
Install raised median (Between Hilltop Dr and Churn Creek Rd) Install bike lanes/Install separated bike lanes
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install raised median (Between Dana Dr and Browning Dr) Install edge-lines and centerlines (between Ross/Big-Lots Driveway and Margalia St) Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk to guide pedestrians to the enhanced crosswalk with RRFB
Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Install multiuse path/ sharrow on eastbound approach to the intersection of W Cypress Ave/ Market St
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Add Segment Lighting
Install curve advance warning signs
Increase DUI enforcement
Add Segment Lighting
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Install raised median (on the approaches to Hartnell Ave) Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs S Bonnyview Rd (S
Market St to Churn
Creek Rd)
Install Separated Bike Lanes
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress
Ave to n/o 3rd St)
Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd)
W Cypress Ave (Market
St to Park Marina Dr)
Churn Creek Rd
(Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o
Browning St to
Maraglia St)
E Cypress Ave (Park
Marina Dr to Churn
Creek Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding
Hilltop Apartments to
St Thomas Pkwy)
Hartnell Ave
(Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd)
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page v
• Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 4.11a Approve Local Road Safety Plan 2.15.22 (4.11(e)--Adopt Resolution for amended LRSP and Authorize Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page vi