CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
FIRE DEPARTMENT
AB 38 Inspection - Residential Defensible Space Inspection 87.00 85.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2023-059 Hazardous Material Response Fee 489.00 547.00 Per hour per response CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Prevention Inspection Report 66.00 68.00 Per report CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 False Alarm Fee 858.00 834.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Emergency Response to DUI collision 489.00 547.00 Per hour per response CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Inspection Third Time and Thereafter 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Inspection Fee
Fire Clearance Annual Inspection
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 3-5 Units 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 6-15 units 184.00 189.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 16-25 Units 219.00 225.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 26-60 Units 255.00 262.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 61-100 Units 290.00 298.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 101-200 Units 325.00 334.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 201-300 Units 360.00 370.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 301-400+ Units 396.00 407.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Annual Licensed Care Inspection or Pre-Inspection -
Facilities 7-25 occupants 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Facilities 26-50 occupants 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Facilities over 50 occupants 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Safety Inspection
Drinking / Dining - Over 50 occupants 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Hotel, Motel, Apartment House 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Hazardous Occupancy - (High Risk Businesses) 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Other State Required Inspections 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Day Care
Commercial 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Residential - (Large Family Daycare) 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Hospitals, Surgical Centers, I-Occupancies 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Code Annual Permits: All R.M.C.
Food Trucks 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 9.20.010 Aircraft Refueling Vehicles 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Aircraft Repair Hangars 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Automobile Wrecking Yards/Junk Yards 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Candles and Open Flames in Public Assembly 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 CA Fire Code Combustible Fiber Storage 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Chapter 1 Compressed Gases and Cryogens 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 105.2.2 Explosive and Blasting Permits:
Blasting 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Powder Sales 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Transportation 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Flammable Liquids:
Storage, handling, or use of Class I liquids in excess of 5 gallons inside a building or 10 gallons not inside a building 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Storage, handling, or use of Class II or III-A liquids in excess of 25 gallons in a building or 60 gallons not in a building 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Install or alter any flammable liquid tank or piping 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Garages 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048
Motor vehicle fuel dispensing stations 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Hazardous Materials 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Hazardous Production Materials 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 High Piled Storage 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Magnesium Working 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Covered Mall, Special Uses 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Places of Assembly 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 FIRE DEPARTMENT (continued)
Welding or Cutting Operations 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Storage and handling of Level 2 and 3 aerosol products in excess of 500 pounds 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048
Tire Storage 155.00 151.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Code Event Permits
Bonfires or Rubbish Fires 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Open-Air Public Assembly Permit Fee 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Tents & Canopies 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Air-Support Structures 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Fireworks:
Public Display 151.00 155.00 Per Event CPI Reso 2025-048 Special Effects 151.00 155.00 Per Event CPI Reso 2025-048 Liquefied Petroleum Gas 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Carnivals and fairs or festival 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Other Required Fire Code Permits 151.00 155.00 Per Inspection CPI Reso 2025-048 Conference / Meeting Room
1 - 4 hours 40.00 39.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
4.1 or more hours 78.00 80.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Photograph Copies 9.70 10.00 Per each copy CPI Reso 2020-082
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Concealed weapons permits:
New 76.00 74.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2020-082 P.C. §12054 Renewal 46.00 45.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2020-082 P.C. §12054 Second-hand dealer permit:
Initial Fee 86.00 84.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2020-082 Per employee 32.00 31.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2020-082 Renewal 86.00 84.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2020-082
Cardroom license, application 1,080.00 1,050.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.6.14.060 Cardroom table fee, per table , per year 435.00 423.00 Per table, per year CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.6.14.060 Cardroom permit new (owner/employee) 56.00 54.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.6.14.100 Cardroom permit renewal 32.00 31.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.6.14.100 Massage permit new (owner/employee) 82.00 80.00 Plus DOJ Fees CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C. 6.08.020 Massage permit renewal 31.00 30.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C. 6.08.020 Emergency response (DUI arrest & traffic collision) 126.00 123.00 Per hour per officer CPI Reso 2020-082 G.C. §53150-58 Tow Truck inspection (yearly) 61.00 59.00 Per Truck CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Topside 124.00 121.00 Per Truck CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Underneath 254.00 247.00 Per Truck CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT
Conference / Meeting Room:
1 - 4 hours 46.00 45.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
4.1 - or more hours / day 88.00 90.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Temporary Power Connection and Meter Set Fee 65.00 67.00 With Permit CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.6.30.040 &
Proposition 4
CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT- MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
Water
Water Service Installation (includes meter)
Service Size, 5/8" meter 3,362.00 3,444.00 CCI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.14.08.310 Service Size, 3/4" meter 3,395.00 3,478.00 CCI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.14.08.310 Service Size, 1" meter 3,469.00 3,554.00 CCI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.14.08.310 Service Size, 11/2" meter 4,309.00 4,414.00 CCI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.14.08.310 Water Meter Set Installation (meter only)
Meter Size, 5/8" meter 146.00 150.00 CCI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.14.08.310 Meter Size, 3/4" meter 176.00 180.00 CCI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.14.08.310 Meter Size, 1" meter 234.00 240.00 CCI Reso 2017-054 R.M.C.14.08.310 Meter Size, 11/2" meter 549.00 CCI 562.00 Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.14.08.310 Paving Cut Charge (water service) 960.00 983.00 CCI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.14.08.310 Water Service Split (multiple meters on parcel) 761.00 780.00 CCI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.14.08.310 Backflow Prevention Assembly and Testing 4.10 4.00 Per month CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.160 Private Fire Hydrant Service 6.80 6.60 Per Hydrant per month CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.370 Private Fire Service Lines: RMC 14.08.320
Fixed Monthly service charge RMC 14.08.320
Line size 4" 5.60 5.40 CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.320
Line size 6" 8.30 8.10 CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.320
Line size 8" 10.00 10.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.320 Line size 10" 12.00 12.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.320 Line size 12" 15.00 15.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 RMC 14.08.320 Fire Hydrant Service Outside Incorporated area of City
Demand Charge 13.00 13.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082
Maintenance Cost 17.00 17.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 Billing / Collection Charge 4.70 4.80 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 Surcharge / Monthly Service Fee times 1.5 17.00 17.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 City Council Policy 1411 Wastewater
Wastewater Line Tap
Tap Fee, 4" lateral 271.00 278.00 CCI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.14.16.205 Storm Drain
Drainage Basin Inlet Marker (installed) - Required on all new inlets 20.00 20.00 CCI Reso 2020-082
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION
Final parcel map review fee (covers 2 plan checks)
534.00 519.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
R.M.C.17.16.030 & Prop
4 Lot merger / property line adjustments for 2 parcels with maximum of 2 plan checks 254.00 247.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Grading Permit:
50 to 1,000 yards 603.00 586.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 1,001 to 2,000 yards 730.00 710.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 2,001 to 3,000 yards 858.00 834.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 3,001 to 4,000 yards 983.00 956.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 4,001 to 5,000 yards 1,126.00 1,095.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 5,001 to 10,000 yards y 1,348.00 1,311.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 yards 260.00 253.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070
Clearing (for grading):
1 to 2 acres 136.00 132.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070
2.1 to 5 acres 195.00 190.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070
5.1 to 10 acres 407.00 396.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 For each additional 5 acres or fraction thereof in excess of 10 acres 61.00 59.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 Appeals (for grading) 105.00 102.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.16.12.070 Encroachment permit fees (2% due at time of submittal for plan review, remaining 3% due when permit is issued. Exception: Encroachment permit applications for public improvements of $500,000 or greater may request plan check and inspection fees be calculated based on the subdivision related improvement provisions of this schedule.) 109.00 106.00 $109 or 5% of Engineer's Estimate, whichever is
greater CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
Sidewalk Vending Permit Application Fee 508.00 494.00 CPI Reso 2019-116
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ALL DIVISIONS
Consultation NA 74.00 Per Hour
Notary/Recording Document NA 120.00
Shasta County Recording Fee (Auto-adjusted to Shasta County Fee Schedule) NA 14.00 Plus $3.00 per page
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUILDING DIVISION
Building Permit Microfilming / Imaging Charge 1.90 2.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Construction Waste Management Deposit Residential NA refundable 500.00 CALGreen Construction Waste Management Deposit Commercial NA refundable 1,000.00 CALGreen Other Inspections and Fees (All Permit Types)
Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours 152.00 156.00 Per Hour (2 hour minimum) CPI Reso 2020-082 Reinspection Fees 100.00 97.00
Per hour (Fees are assessed after the 2nd reinspection and all subsequent inspections) CPI Reso 2024-059 Inspection where no separate fee is indicated 97.00 100.00 Per hour CPI Reso 2025-048 Additional Administrative Review / Plan Review 97.00 129.00 Per hour CPI Reso 2020-082 Appliances Regulated by Code not in other category 109.00 13.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Demolition Permit 13.00 201.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Manufactured Home Fee 190.00 569.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Permit Processing Fees
Building Permit Fees Total Valuation
$ 1 to $ 500 31.30 32.20 CPI Reso 2020-082
$ 501 to 2,000 31.30 32.20 Plus $4.39 for each additional 100 over first 500 CPI Reso 2020-082 $ 2,001 to 25,000 95.30 98.10 Plus $19.45 for each add'l 1000 over first 2,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 $ 25,001 to 50,000 530.40 545.60 Plus $14.14 for each add'l 1000 over first 25,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 $ 50,001 to 100,000 874.20 899.10 Plus $9.73 for each add'l 1000 over first 50,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 $ 100,001 to 500,000 1,347.30 1,385.50 Plus $7.52 for each add'l 1000 over first 100,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 $ 500,001 to 1,000,000 4,269.90 4,392.10 Plus $6.43 for each add'l 1000 over first 500,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 $ 1,000,001 and up 7,395.40 7,605.40
Plus $4.38 for each add'l 1000 over first 1,000,000
CPI Reso 2020-082
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 322.00 331.00 Every 60 days CPI Reso 2024-059 Model Home Permit
Residential 435.00 423.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Building Permit Prior to Subdivision Acceptance
Residential 362.00 352.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Authorization to Start Work
Commercial 217.00 211.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Water Efficient Landscape Documentation
2,500 square feet to 40,000 square feet of Landscaping 474.00 461.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Ordinance 2449 Over 40,000 square feet of Landscaping 667.00 649.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Ordinance 2449 Plan Check - Outside normal business hours 152.00 148.00 Per Hour (2 hour minimum) CPI Reso 2020-082
CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUILDING DIVISION - Permit Processing Fees (continued) Permit Extension Fee
1st Extension 37.00 38.00 After 180 days CPI Reso 2024-059 2nd Extension and Subsequent 125.00 129.00 Each additional 180 days CPI Reso 2024-059 Application Extension Fee
1st Extension 37.00 38.00 After 180 days CPI Reso 2024-059 2nd Extension and Subsequent 125.00 129.00 Each additional 180 days CPI Reso 2024-059 Residential Reroof Fee 290.00 298.00 Per roof CPI Reso 2025-048 Residential Window and Door Fee 25.00 26.00 Per window/door CPI Reso 2024-059 Electric Permit Fees
Permit Issuance - each permit 60.00 58.00 Per each permit CPI Reso 2020-082 Each supplemental permit 9.70 9.40 Per each supplemental permit CPI Reso 2020-082 System Fee Schedule
New Residential Buildings
Single One and two family 0.079 0.132 Per square foot CPI Reso 2020-082 Multi Family / Hotel Motel 0.068 0.091 Per square foot CPI Reso 2020-082 New Non-residential Buildings
0 to 3,000 square feet 0.094 0.116 Per square foot CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 3,0001 square feet 0.079 0.061 Per square foot CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 10,000 square feet 0.060 0.062 Per square foot CPI Reso 2020-082 SHELL MEP Fee 216.00 CPI
ADU MEP Fee 144.00 CPI
Private Swimming Pools 62.00 60.00 Per swimming pool CPI Reso 2020-082 Electric Service
1 - 200 amps 38.00 39.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
201 - 1000 amps 75.00 77.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
over 1000 amps 157.00 161.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Alternative Power Source Other Than Solar Permit (Batteries, Generator, Wind Turbine) 193.00 187.50 CPI Reso 2020-082 Electric Sign Permit 98.00 95.00 Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Misc. Circuits 31.00 32.00 CPI Reso 2024-059
Temporary Power Pole Inspection 34.00 33.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Energy Service Change (Residential) 159.00 163.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Energy Service Change (Commercial) 223.00 229.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Energy Permit Fee 58.00 60.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Main Breaker (base fee) NA 69.00 Plus $12.00 for each additional main breaker CPI Sub Panel (base fee) NA 75.00 Plus $18.00 for each additional sub panel CPI Misc. Circuit (base fee) NA 81.00 Plus $24.00 for each additional circuit CPI Electric Service
100-400 amps NA 117.00 Plus $12.00 for each meter CPI
401-999 amps NA 165.00 Plus $12.00 for each meter CPI
1000-3000 amps NA 189.00 Plus $12.00 for each meter CPI Meters NA 12.00 Per meter CPI
Fire Permit Fees
Fire & Life Safety Plan Check and Inspection
Commercial and Multi-Family Sprinkler Plan Check Fee
Total Value
$ 1.00 to $ 500.00 3.80 3.90 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 501.00 to $ 2,000.00 3.80 3.90 Plus $0.48 for each add'l $100 over the first $500 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 2,001.00 to $ 25,000.00 10.80 11.10 Plus $2.3 for each add'l $1000 over the first $2,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 25,001.00 to $ 50,000.00 62.30 64.10
Plus $1.59 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$25,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$ 50,001.00 to $ 100,000.00 101.00 103.90
Plus $1.12 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$50,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$ 100,001.00 to $ 500,000.00 155.50 159.90
Plus $0.853053364264502 for each add'l $1,000
over the first $100,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 $ 500,001.00 to $ 1,000,000.00 487.30 501.10
Plus $0.7 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$500,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
$1,000,001.00 and up 828.50 850.70
Plus $0.56 for each add'l $1,000 over the first
$1,000,000 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
Fire & Life Safety Plan Check
Minor Tenant Improvement NA 308.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI Proposition 4 Small Commercial NA 616.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI Proposition 4 Medium Commercial NA 924.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI Proposition 4 Large / Complex NA 1,232.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI Proposition 4 Miscellaneous Plan Check 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Proposition 4 Buckeye Single Family Resident Site Review 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Buckeye Single Family Resident Site Visit 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 R-3 Fire Sprinkler Plan Check 130.00 126.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Commercial Sprinkler System Inspection and Test
Per Sprinkler Riser or Floor plus 145.00 149.00 Per Sprinkler Riser CPI Reso 2025-048 Per Sprinkler Head 2.60 3.00 Per Sprinkler Head CPI Reso 2020-082 Commercial Fire Sprinkler Plan Check and Inspection
Up to 50 heads 462.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI
51–200 heads 770.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI
201–500 heads 1,232.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI
Over 500 heads 1,540.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI R-3 Fire Sprinkler Field Inspection and Test 334.00 325.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Sprinkler Re-Inspection (3rd time & thereafter) 150.00 146.00 Per hour, one hour minimum CPI Reso 2023-059 R-1, 2, 4 Fire Sprinkler Field Inspection and Test
Per Sprinkler Riser or Floor plus 145.00 149.00 Per Sprinkler Riser CPI Per Sprinkler Head 2.60 2.70 Per Sprinkler Head CPI Reso 2020-082 Hood and Duct Fire Suppression System Plan Review & Inspection 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Review & Inspection of Fire Service Line 466.00 453.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 Review & Inspection of Fire Pump 466.00 453.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 Review & Inspection of Standpipe Systems 155.00 151.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Alarm Plan Check Fee 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Alarm Field Inspection and Test plus 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Plus per devise 1.60 1.60 Per Device CPI Reso 2020-082
Fire Field Inspections 151.00 155.00 Per hour, One hour minimum CPI Reso 2025-048 Fire Field Inspection and Re-Inspection
Hourly Consultation NA 154.00 CPI
Re-Inspection NA 231.00 CPI
After-Hours NA 231.00 CPI
Fire Alarm Review
1–20 devices NA 462.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI
21–100 devices NA 770.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI 100+ devices NA 1,232.00 Includes 1 field inspection CPI
CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUILDING DIVISION (continued) Mechanical Permit Fees
Permit Issuance 60.00 58.00 Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Supplemental Permit Issuance 9.50 9.80 Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Residential Buildings
One and Two Family NA 0.092 Per square foot CPI
Multi Family / Hotel Motel NA 0.055 Per square foot CPI Non-residential Buildings NA
0 to 3,000 square feet NA 0.079 Per square foot CPI
Over 3,000 square feet NA 0.039 Per square foot CPI
SHELL MEP Fee NA 216.00 CPI
ADU MEP Fee NA 144.00 CPI
Unit Fee Schedule
Installation of force air or gravity type furnace or burner Up to and including 100,000 Btu/h 19.00 20.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 100,000 Btu/h 36.00 37.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of floor furnace 19.00 20.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor mounted heater 19.00 20.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation, relocation or replacement of appliance vent 9.50 9.80 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Repair or alteration of, or addition of each heating appliance, 19.00 20.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system including installation of controls
Installation or relocation of boiler or compressor
Replacement of each heating appliance, refrigeration
unit, cooling unit, absorption unit or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system including
installation of controls 220.00 226.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2025-048 Up to 3 horsepower or 100,000 Btu/h 19.00 20.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Up to 15 horsepower or 500,000 Btu/h 36.00 37.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Up to 30 horsepower or 1,000,000 Btu/h 46.00 47.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Up to 50 horsepower or 1,750,000 Btu/h 67.00 69.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 50 horsepower or 1,750,000 Btu/h 115.00 118.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Air-handling unit
Up to 10,000 cubic feet per minute 13.00 13.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 10,000 cubic feet per minute 24.00 25.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Evaporative Cooler, not portable 20.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Ventilation fan connected to single duct 9.50 9.80 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Ventilation system not part of heating or a/c system 13.00 13.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation of each hood served by mechanical exhaust 13.00 13.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of domestic incinerator 24.00 25.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation or relocation of commercial or industrial type incinerator
95.00 98.00
Per Each
CPI Reso 2020-082
Solar Collector 8.00 7.80 Per Collector CPI Reso 2020-082 Solar Storage Tank 7.80 8.00 Per Tank CPI Reso 2020-082 Plumbing Permit Fees
Permit Issuance 60.00 58.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Supplemental Issuance 9.50 9.80 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Residential Buildings
One and Two Family NA 0.122 Per square foot CPI
Multi Family / Hotel Motel NA 0.064 Per square foot CPI Non-residential Buildings NA
0 to 3,000 square feet NA 0.104 Per square foot CPI
Over 3,000 square feet NA 0.052 Per square foot CPI
SHELL MEP Fee NA 216.00 CPI
ADU MEP Fee NA 144.00 CPI
Unit Fee Schedule
Plumbing Fixture or Trap 12.00 12.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Building Sewer or Trailer Park Sewer 32.00 33.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Rainwater System 12.00 12.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Cesspool 46.00 47.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Private Sewage Disposal System 95.00 98.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Swimming Pool 95.00 98.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Water heater and / or vent 16.00 16.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Industrial - waste pretreatment interceptor 25.00 26.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and or water-treating equipment 6.00 6.20 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping 6.00 6.20 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Lawn Sprinkler System on any one Meter 18.00 19.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Atmospheric Type Vacuum Breakers Reso 2020-082
1 to 5 16.00 16.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Over 5 5.10 5.20 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Back-flow Protection Device
2 inches or smaller 16.00 16.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082 Over 2 inches 32.00 33.00 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Gas Piping System
1 to four 6.00 6.20 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
5 or more 1.60 1.60 Per Each CPI Reso 2020-082
Water Heater replacement 220.00 226.20 Per Each CPI Reso 2025-048 Other Inspections and Fees (All Permit Types)
Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours 152.00 156.00 Per Hour (2 hour minimum) CPI Reso 2020-082 Moved up Reinspection Fees 97.00 100.00
Per hour (Fees are assessed after the 2nd reinspection and all subsequent inspections) CPI Reso 2024-059 Moved up Inspection where no separate fee is indicated 97.00 100.00 Per hour CPI Reso 2025-048 Moved up Additional Administrative Review / Plan Review 97.00 100.00 Per hour CPI Reso 2020-082 Moved up Appliances Regulated by Code not in other category 109.00 112.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Moved up Demolition Permit 13.00 13.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Moved up Manufactured Home Fee 190.00 195.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Moved up Appeals
Board of Appeals 190.00 195.00 CPI Reso 2020-082
Seasonal Sales Lot Permit Fee
Seasonal Sales Lot 189.00 194.00 CPI Reso 2024-059
All Building Division fees assessed on permits for the repair or replacement of structures located on properties affected by the CARR Fire shall be reduced by 20%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
Permit Processing Fees
Parcel Maps / Property Line Adjustment:
Administrative Parcel Map - exempt from CA Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 4,886.00 4,752.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
All G.C. §66451.2 &
§66451.33
Major 2- to 4- Parcel Split - NOT exempt from CEQA 9,054.00 9,310.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Property Line Adjustment 1,135.00 1,167.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 Parcel Map Amendment or Extension 3,880.00 3,990.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Administrative Parcel Map Amendment or Extension 2,587.00 2,660.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION - Permit Processing Fees (continued) Subdivisions:
Subdivision and Condominium Conversions: Deposit Deposit Actual Cost 5 to 25 lots 14,231.00 13,840.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 §66451.33 26 to 50 lots 17,518.00 18,013.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 51 to 100 lots 23,813.00 24,486.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 101 or more lots 26,099.00 26,836.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Extension 3,223.00 3,134.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Amendment 6,155.00 6,329.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Reversion to Acreage 809.00 832.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Deposit Deposit Actual Cost
Annexation 5,298.00 5,152.00
Cost + 100% Overhead (does not include LAFCO &
State Fees) CPI Reso 2022-059
Abandonment:
Summary Vacation 370.00 380.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Right of Way 5,820.00 5,984.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Easement 664.00 646.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4
Use Permits / Site Development Permits & Planned Development Plans Residential Project:
First 4 units 5,174.00 5,320.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 5 to 49 units 12,935.00 13,300.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 50 or more units 19,402.00 19,950.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Mobile Home Park 12,935.00 13,300.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Miscellaneous 1,895.00 1,949.00 Plus $500 per additional location CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Commercial / Industrial New Construction
1 acre or less 7,621.00 7,836.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104
1.1 to 5 acres 14,960.00 15,383.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 G.C. §65104
5.1 to 10 acres 19,585.00 20,138.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 G.C. §65104 Over 10 acres 20,695.00 21,280.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Amendment - Minor by Director 780.00 802.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 G.C. §65104 Extension 1,331.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Site Development Permit - Director 5,400.00 5,553.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 G.C. §65104 Site Development Permit - Director Amendment 2,587.00 2,660.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Temporary Use Permit 1,160.00 1,193.00 Plus $250 per additional location CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Final Plan Review 2,587.00 2,660.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Short Term Rental - Vacation Rental 1,294.00 1,331.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Short Term Rental - Hosted Homestay 226.00 232.00 CPI 0 Tree Permit 67.00 65.00 Per Tree CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Administrative Sign Permits:
Temporary Promotional Advertising 496.00 510.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Temporary Banner Permit 32.00 33.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Permanent Advertising Sign 922.00 948.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Murals 51.00 50.00 CPI Reso 2024-059
General Plan Amendments / Specific Plans:
1 acre or less 12,935.00 13,300.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
1.1 to 10 acres 15,521.00 15,959.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
10.1 to 100 acres 19,402.00 19,950.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Over 100 acres 25,870.00 26,601.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
Deposit Deposit Actual Cost
General Plan Amendment (Text) 4,276.00 4,397.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Specific Plan Amendment (Text) 4,276.00 4,397.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2023-059 G.C. §65104 Rezoning:
Planned Development Overlay District only 4,527.00 4,655.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 1 acre or less 7,115.00 7,316.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104
1.1 to 10 acres 10,994.00 11,305.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104
10.1 to 100 acres 19,402.00 19,950.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Over 100 acres 25,870.00 26,601.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Variance:
Zoning Exception 1,294.00 1,331.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Zoning Exception Amendment 1,553.00 1,597.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Major Variance 8,213.00 8,445.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Variance Amendment 5,236.00 5,384.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Recreational Vehicle Parking Exception 646.00 664.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Recreational Vehicle Parking Exception Renewal 324.00 333.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Development Agreement Application 8,426.00 8,664.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65865(d) Deposit Deposit Actual Cost
Ordinance Amendment (Text) 4,397.00 4,276.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Surface Mining / Reclamation Plans 6,922.00 7,118.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.18.63.050 Annual Surface Mining Inspection Administrative Fee 1, 1,175.00 143.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C.18.63.050 Environmental Impact Report Processing: Deposit Deposit Actual Cost All Pub. Resources Code
§21089(a)
0.1 to 5 acres 6,155.00 6,329.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059
5.1 to 10 acres 7,466.00 7,677.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059
10.1 to 20 acres 9,568.00 9,838.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059
20.1 to 40 acres 15,835.00 16,282.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059
40.1 to 100 acres 21,014.00 21,608.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 For each 25 acres or fraction thereof in excess of 100 acres 2,563.00 2,493.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Deposit Deposit Actual Cost
CEQA Mitigation Monitoring - Deposit 732.00 712.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Pre-Application Review / Downtown Specific Plan Area 504.00 490.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Appeals:
Applicant 1,331.00 1,294.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Administrative Permit (appeal by applicant) to Bar 1,294.00 1,331.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 G.C. §65104 Land Use History/Toxic Hazard Review/Qualified Historic Property Designation 458.00 445.00 Plus Time and Materials CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Street Renaming Request
0 - 1000 feet of street 1,625.00 1,671.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Over 1000 feet of street 1,918.00 1,972.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Proposition 4 Floodplain Determination/Zoning Confirm Letter/ABC Public Necessity Determination. 226.00 220.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
Elevation Certificate 202.00 208.00 CPI Reso 2022-059
Certificate of Compliance Letter 1,941.00 1,996.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 LOMA / LOMR Processing
Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) 423.00 435.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) 728.00 749.00 Cost + 100% Overhead CPI Reso 2022-059 Senate Bill Fees
SB 35 1,040.00 1,040.00 CPI Reso 2025-048
SB 9 Pre-Application 478.00 478.00 CPI Reso 2025-048
SB 9 Application Review 390.00 390.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 SB 1395 Low Barrier Navigation Center Review NA 1,071.00 CPI Reso 2025-048 All G.C. §65104 and
§65456(b)
CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION Application Fees
Residential Cannabis Cultivation (Recreational) 128.00 132.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Retail 7,761.00 7,980.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Commercial Cannabis Cultivation 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Manufacturing 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Distribution 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Processing 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Testing 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Storage 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Microbusiness 6,468.00 6,651.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 All Cannabis Businesses - Annual Renewal 3, 3,391.00 298.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Residential Cannabis Cultivation (Recreational) - Annual Renewal 26.00 25.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Commercial modification of premises 9,975.00 9,701.00 CPI Reso 2024-059 Annual License Fees
All Cannabis Businesses 36,089.00 37,108.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Cannabis Microbusiness 77,611.00 79,803.00 CPI Reso 2022-059 R.M.C. 6.12 Tobacco Retail License fee 1,176.63 CPI 1,210.00 Reso 2025-072 R.M.C. 6.13 Processing Fees
Plan Check NA 68.00 CPI
Title Demand/Research NA Per Hour 86.00 CPI
Inspection Warrant NA 476.00 CPI
Inspections Outside Normal Business Hours NA Per Hour 68.00 CPI Reinspection NA Per Hour 68.00 CPI
Document Processing and Recording (Liens, NOP, NONC, etc.) NA 89.00 CPI Posting of Notices on Site (after returned mail) NA 68.00 CPI Missed Inspection NA 68.00 CPI
Stipulation Agreement Processing NA 172.00 CPI
Office Hearing NA Per Hour 227.00 CPI
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT- GIS DIVISION
Maps
18 x 24 38.00 37.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
24 x 36 46.00 45.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4
36 x 48 and Larger 54.00 56.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Maps / GIS Data in Electronic Format 97.00 94.00 Per Megabyte (MB) $97 minimum charge CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Additional copies of Color Plots
18 x 24 and Larger 27.00 28.00 CPI Reso 2020-082 Proposition 4 Custom Mapping or GIS Analysis 111.00 114.00 Per hour CPI Reso 2025-048
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - SOLID WASTE TRANSFER / RECYCLING FACILITY Green Waste (no concrete/dirt/rocks/asphalt)
Per Ton Rate 34.75 37.50 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110
Pickup
Minimum (4-30 gal cans/bags, up to level pick up bed 15.00 16.25 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Bed 17.25 18.75 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Cab 19.00 20.50 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Bag or Waste Can - 33 gallon (Maximum of 3) 4.50 4.75 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Household Waste
Per Ton Rate - under 2 tons or <5 cubic yards 112.00 121.00 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 2 tons or more or > 5 cubic yards 114.50 123.75 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Pickup
Minimum (4 - 33 gal cans/bags, up to level pickup bed 31.00 33.50 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Bed 33.75 36.50 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Above Pickup Cab 38.00 41.00 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Bag or Waste Can - 33 gallon (maximum of 3) 4.50 4.75 Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Car Tire (no wheel / rim) 2.75 3.75 Reso 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Car Tire with Rim 4.75 6.50 Reso 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 Truck Tire (no wheel / rim) (46" diameter x 12" wide) 8.25 8.75 Reso 2015-071 R.M.C.9.28.110 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - SOLID WASTE TRANSFER / RECYCLING FACILITY (continued) Fluid removal 6.50 6.25 CPI Reso 2025-048
Couch/Large chair/Table (hard to handle items) 8.50 8.75 CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Mattress/Box Spring 8.50 8.75 CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Motor Removal 6.50 6.25 CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Refrigerant removal 6.25 6.50 CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Mercury Switch Processing 13.25 13.50 CPI Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Master lock Padlock for Commercial Waste Receptacles 14.75 each 18.00 each Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.9.28.110 Non-Curbside Collection Surcharge: (Wheeled Waste Carts) Rate / Month 4.50 4.75 Reso 2024-059
Replacement Fee ** The City reserves the right to charge the customer for the replacement cost of a lost, stolen, damaged,
or destroyed wheeled waste cart, metal container,
or drop box(es). MO 2011-108
** All solid waste charges are subject to a 1.36% Landfill monitoring fee.
PUBLIC WORKS - AIRPORTS
Aircraft Storage Rentals - Benton Field:
Closed Hangar 1 - 20 204.00 210.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 21 - 30 222.00 228.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 31 - 40 297.00 305.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 41 - 50 370.00 380.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Open Hangar 145.00 149.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Sun Shade Hangar 145.00 149.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Storage Rentals - Regional Airport:
Closed Hangar 1 - 20 222.00 228.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 21 - 29 and 31 - 40 239.00 246.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 30 w/ Office 297.00 339.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 41 - 70 260.00 267.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 71 - 80 297.00 305.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 81 - 88 352.00 362.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Closed Hangar 90 - 99 423.00 435.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Executive Hangar 961.00 988.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Port-A-Port 370.00 374.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Twin Engine 575.00 559.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Jet Pod - Hangar 89 1,501.00 1,543.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020
CITY OF REDDING
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
Fiscal Year 2026-27
2025-26 2026-27 Last Changed
Type of Fee or Adopted Proposed Additional Information Inflation Resolution or Authority Service Charge Fee Fee Indicator Ordinance
Aircraft Storage Rentals - Regional Airport: (Continued) Miscellaneous Fees Benton Field and Redding Regional Airport Aircraft Tie-Down (single) 52.00 55.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Tie-Down (twin & helicopter) 95.00 98.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Tie-down (Single - Commercial Use) 146.00 142.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Aircraft Tie-down (Twin - Commercial Use) 180.00 185.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2023-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Transient Tie-Down
Single 6.00 10.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Twin 7.00 14.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Small Business Jet 22.00 25.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2006-90 R.M.C.3.04.020 Helicopter Reso 2006-90 R.M.C.3.04.020
Light (<3,500 lbs.) 6.00 10.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Intermediate (3,500 to 7,000 lbs.) 9.00 12.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Medium (7,000 to 12,500 lbs.) 12.00 15.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Heavies (12,500 lbs. >) 15.00 20.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Hangar Office - Single 40.00 95.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Hangar Office - Twin 69.00 190.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Electric Outlet Fee 7.00 7.00 Per Outlet Per Day Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Large Aircraft Overnight Fee greater than 2,500 sq.ft 45.00 46.00 Per Night CPI Reso 2020-082 R.M.C.3.04.020 Heating or Cooling Equipment Installation Surcharge 19.00 20.00 Per Month CPI Reso 2020-082 Delinquency Penalty - Rentals 50.00 50.00 Per Day Reso 2024-059 R.M.C.3.04.020 Ground Rental Rate - Benton Field & Regional Airport
Benton Field:
Non-Commercial 0.042 0.050 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Commercial 0.034 0.045 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Regional Airport:
Non-Commercial 0.042 0.050 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Commercial 0.037 0.045 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Facility Rental Rate - Redding Regional Airport
Terminal Building 2.000 3.54 Per square foot per month
(when not otherwise specified in lease)
Reso 2025-048
Commercial 0.037 0.037 Per square foot per month Reso 2020-082 Landing Fees (>12,5000 lbs gross weight):
Scheduled Aircraft providing regularly scheduled passenger or freight services (regardless of weight) 1.65 2.00 Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.3.04.030 Non-scheduled passenger or freight aircraft over 12,500 lbs. gross weight providing unscheduled passenger service (i.e. Charters) 1.90 2.50 Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight Reso 2025-048 R.M.C. 3.04.030 Freight aircraft regardless of weight NA 2.00 Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight R.M.C.3.04.030 Aircraft operating from Redding Regional Airport in performance of special contracts for fighting fire or otherwise with federal, state, or county governments:
1.50 1.75 Per 1,000 lbs. certified gross landing weight Reso 2015-071 R.M.C.3.04.030 RON (Remain Over Night) Fee:
Scheduled aircraft providing regularly scheduled passenger service NA 25.00 Per night, per aircraft ADA Jet Aircraft Passenger Ramp 100.00 100.00 Per Use Reso 2006-90 Enplaning Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) 4.50 4.50 Per Passenger Reso 2006-90 P.L.101-508Title IX Public Paid Parking:
0 - 4 hours (Autos only - No Oversized Vehicles) No Charge No Charge Reso 2015-071 Short-Term Daily Parking Rate for Vehicles Parked in Short-Term Parking over Four Hours 24.00 24.00
Reso 2025-048
Long-Term Daily Parking Rate (compact, mid-size, and full size cars, light & medium trucks) 12.00 12.00
Reso 2025-048
Weekly Rate in Long-Term Parking Only 72.00 72.00 Reso 2025-048 Oversized Vehicle
Daily Rate 14.00 14.00
Weekly Rate 84.00 84.00
Long -Term Parking (Auto only) - Flight Crews Only 30.00 30.00 Monthly - Six month minimum Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.3.04.030 Late Payment Processing Fee 15.00
Public Parking Non-Payment Violations: NA 104.00 if paid within 14 days of the violation date NA 125.00 if paid within 21 days of the violation date
NA 150.00 if paid after 21 days of the violation date
Late Payment Processing Fee 15.00 or 3% 15.00 or 3% Whichever is greater Reso 2020-082 Miscellaneous Fees
Filming Per Day, or fraction thereof 1,000.00
Still Photography Per Day, or fraction thereof 500.00
Air Stairs 50.00 50.00 Per Use Reso 2006-90
ADA Jet Aircraft Passenger Ramp 100.00 100.00 Per Use Reso 2006-90 Moved up ADA Commuter Aircraft Passenger Ramp 50.00 50.00 Per Use Reso 2006-90 Commercial Mobile Vendor User Fee 10.00 10.00 Per Month July 21, 2009
CC Item 9.11.(f)
Per day per space occupied
Applies to any vehicle occupying multiple spaces.
Reso 2025-048 R.M.C.3.04.030
R.M.C.3.04.030
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve setting a Public Hearing on July 21, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider adjustments to the City of Redding’s Schedule of Fees and Service Charges.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to setting the public hearing.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to set the public hearing and provide alternate direction to staff.
Background/Analysis
The attached Schedule of Fees and Service Charges includes only those fees that have recommended adjustments or have changed by Consumer Price Index (CPI) or Construction Cost Index (CCI). The full schedule will be posted on August 1, 2026.
California Government Code Sections 66016 and 66018 require that a public hearing be noticed at least ten days prior to a proposed levy of, or increase in, municipal fees and service charges.
On an annual basis, and in accordance with City Council Policy No. 802, the Finance Division submits to the Council proposed changes, deletions, and additions to the schedule. In accordance with adopted City of Redding policy, staff requests that pursuant to Government Code requirements, a public hearing on the proposed adjustments be set for June 16, 2026.
Fees are determined based on cost analysis in accordance with Proposition 26. Once established, increases on some fees are based on the CPI or the CCI.
MEETING DATE: June 16, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.10(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.10(a)--Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges
Greg Robinett, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 2
Overall, most of the proposed adjustments are based on a 2.82 percent increase in the CPI for the 12-month period ended March 2026 for mid-sized western cities.
Water and wastewater fees related to new development are increased by 2.44 percent, which is the CCI for the 12-month period ended May 2026, pursuant to Redding Municipal Code Section
16.20.050 (Inflationary adjustments).
The schedule is subject to certain rounding conventions in the CPI/CCI calculation. The rounding conventions utilized in the schedule are as follows: for fees under $10.00 and for fees which are tiered, the fee is rounded to the nearest 10 cents. For fees $10.00 and above, the fee is rounded to the nearest whole dollar. As a result, some of the fees and service charges listed in the schedule may not realize an increase as a result of the CPI/CCI calculation. Note that the schedule also contains fees and service charges that do not have a CPI or CCI escalator which results in no change for those fees from the prior year. All new fee requests, corrections or proposed changes are reflected in the schedule in red.
The suggested effective date for all changes to fees and service charges is August 1, 2026.
Below is a list of the summary of changes other than CPI or CCI, by department/division where adjustments are present. If no adjustments beyond CPI or CCI are present in a specific department/division they are not listed below.
No Change
City Clerk;
City Treasurer;
Finance;
Purchasing;
Police Department;
Electric Utility;
Public Works Department;
Public Works – Water;
Public Works – Wastewater;
Public Works – Engineering;
Information Technology – GIS Division; and
Housing Community Development.
City Manager
Replace Deposit for redemption of impounded dog when rabies vaccine is required fee with Redemption of animal (dog or cat impounded);
o First time $10;
o Second time within one year $20; and
o Each time after the second time within one year $25.
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 3
Community Services Department – Recreation Division
Increase in Cancellation fee from $7 to $10;
No change to Additional Labor Fee – CPI increase is not being included; No change to Preparation Fee per field – CPI increase is not being included; New fee amendment: Whistle Stop Park – Nonprofit – charging ½ of regular rent $250; and
New fee amendment: Caldwell Park Teen Center – rent $50.
Fire Department
Increase to Fire Prevention Inspection Fee from $489 to $547; Increase to Emergency Response to DUI collision fee from $489 to 547; and Fire Inspection third time and thereafter added CPI inflator and calculated the increase, from $151 to $155.
Development Services Department – All Division
New Fee amendment: Consultation $74 per hour;
New Fee amendment: Notary/Recording Document $120; and New Fee amendment: Shasta County Recording Fee (Auto-adjusted to Shasta County Fee Schedule) $14 plus $3 per page.
Development Services Department – Building Division
Minor language changes – see schedule for details;
New Fee amendment: Construction Waste Management Deposit Residential $500, refundable – Authority is CALGreen;
New Fee amendment: Construction Waste Management Deposit Commercial $1,000, refundable – authority is CALGreen;
Increase to Additional Administrative Review/Plan Review from $97 to $129, this fee is also moved up on the schedule;
Decrease to Appliance Regulated by Code not in another category from $109 to $13; Increase to Demolition Permit fee from $13 to $201; and Increase to Manufactured Home Fee from $190 to $569.
Electric Permit fees
Residential Buildings;
o Increase one and two family from $0.079 to $0.132 per square foot; o Increase Multi Family / Hotel Motel from $0.068 to $0.091 per square foot; Non-residential Buildings;
o 0 to 3,000 square feet increase from $0.094 to $0.116 per square foot; o Over 3,000 square feet increase from $0.079 to $0.061 per square foot; New fee amendment: SHEL MEP fee $216;
New fee amendment: ADU MEP Fee $144;
New fee amendment: Main Breaker (base fee) $69, plus $12 for each additional main breaker;
New fee amendment: Sub Panel (base fee) $75, plus $18 for each additional sub panel; New fee amendment: Misc. Circuit (base fee) $81, plus $24 each additional circuit; Electric Service fees has had the amps levels changed, see proposed schedule; o 100-400 amps $117, plus $12 for each meter;
o 401-999 amps $165, plus $12 for each meter;
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 4
o 1000-3000 amps $189, plus $12 for each meter; and
o Meters $12 per meter.
Fire Permit Fees
Fire & Life Safety Plan Check Fees are being replaced by new method see proposed schedule. They went from value ranges to time required; o Minor Tenant Improvements $308, includes 1 field inspection; o Small Commercial $616, includes 1 field inspection;
o Medium Commercial $924, includes 1 field inspection;
o Large / Complex $1,232, includes 1 field inspection;
Commercial Fire Sprinkler Plan Check and Inspection are being replaced by a new method see proposed schedule. From a per sprinkler head to a range of heads, the fees are based on hours required for each range of heads;
o Up to 50 heads $462, includes 1 field inspection;
o 51-200 heads $770, includes 1 field inspection;
o 201-500 heads, includes 1 field inspection;
o Over 500 heads $1,540, includes 1 field inspection;
New fee amendment: Fire Field Inspection and Re-Inspection fee; o Hourly consultation $154;
o Re-Inspection $231;
o After-Hours $231;
Fire Alarm Plan Check Fee $151 and Fire Alarm Field Inspection $151, plus $1.60 per devise fees became the Fire Alarm Review fee;
o 1-20 devices $462, includes 1 field inspection;
o 21-100 devices $770, includes 1 field inspection; and o 100 plus devises $1,232, includes 1 filed inspection.
Mechanical Permit Fees
New Fee amendment: Residential Buildings;
o One and two family $0.092 per square foot;
o Multi Family / Hotel Motel $0.055 per square foot;
New Fee amendment: Non-residential Buildings;
o 0 to 3,000 square feet $0.079 per square foot;
o Over 3,000 square feet $0.039 per square foot;
New Fee amendment: SHELL MEP Fee $216; and
New Fee amendment: ADU MEP Fee $144.
Plumbing Permit Fees
New Fee amendment: Residential Buildings;
o One and two family $0.122 per square foot;
o Multi Family / Hotel Motel $0.064 per square foot;
New Fee amendment: Non-residential Buildings;
o 0 to 3,000 square feet $0.104 per square foot;
o Over 3,000 square feet $0.052 per square foot;
New Fee amendment: SHELL MEP Fee $216; and
New Fee amendment: ADU MEP Fee $144.
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 5
Fees Removed
Building Division;
o Other Inspections and Fees (All Permit Types);
Electric Permit fees;
o Over 10,000 square feet (is included in Over 3000 square feet fee); o Electric Service – old methodology fees – a new method is included; o Misc. Circuits;
o Energy Service Charge (residential);
o Energy Service Charge (commercial);
o Energy Permit fee;
Fire Permit Fees;
o Fire & Life safety Plan check and Inspection – old fee method; o Commercial Sprinkler System Inspection and test – old fee method; o R-1,2,4 Fire Sprinkler Field Inspection and Test;
o Fire Alarm Plan check fee (see Fire Alarm Review);
o Fire Alarm Field Inspection and Test plus per devise – old fee method; and o Fire Field Inspections.
Mechanical Permit Fees;
o Installation of force air or gravity type furnace or burner fees; o Installation or relocation of floor furnace fee;
o Installation or relocation of suspended heater, recessed wall heater, or floor mounted heater fee;
o Installation, relocation or replacement of appliance vent fee; o Repair or alteration of, or addition of each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling system including installation of controls;
o Installation or relocation of boiler or compressor;
o Up to 3 horsepower or 100,000 Btu/h;
o Up to 15 horsepower or 500,000 Btu/h;
o Up to 30 horsepower or 1,000,000 Btu/h;
o Up to 50 horsepower or 1,750,000 Btu/h;
o Over 50 horsepower or 1,750,000 Btu/h;
o Air-handling unit Up to 10,000 cubic feet per minute; o Air-handling unit over 10,000 cubic feet per minute;
o Ventilation fan connected to single duct;
o Ventilation system not part of heating or a/c system; o Installation of each hood served by mechanical exhaust; o Installation or relocation of domestic incinerator; and o Installation or relocation of commercial or industrial type incinerator. Plumbing Permit Fees;
o Unit Fee Schedule;
o Plumbing fixture or trap;
o Building Sewer or trailer park sewer;
o Rainwater system;
o Cesspool;
o Private sewage disposal system;
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 6
o Water heater and/or vent;
o Industrial – waste pretreatment interceptor;
o Installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and or water treating equipment;
o Repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping;
o Lawn sprinkler system on any one meter;
o Atmospheric type vacuum breakers, both;
o Back-flow protection device, both;
o Gas piping system, both;
o Other Inspections and fees (all permit types);
o Inspection outside normal business hours;
o Reinspection fees;
o Inspection where no separate fee in indicated;
o Additional administrative review / plan review;
o Appliances regulated by code not in another category; o Demolition Permit; and
o Manufactured home fee.
Development Services Department – Planning Division
New fee amendment: SB 1395 Low Barrier Navigation Center Review $1,071.
Development Services Department – Code Enforcement Division Tobacco Retail License Fee – add CPI and calculate the increase this year, also conform to rounding convention, increase from $1,176.63 to $1,210.
Processing Fees
New Fee amendment: Plan Check $68;
New Fee amendment: Title Demand/Research $86 per hour; New Fee amendment: Inspection Warrant $476;
New Fee amendment: Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours $68 per hour; New Fee amendment: Reinspection $68 per hour;
New Fee amendment: Document Processing and Recording (liens, NOP, NONC, etc.) $89;
New Fee amendment: Posting and Notices on Site (after return mail) $68; New Fee amendment: Missed Inspection $68;
New Fee amendment: Stipulation Agreement Processing $172; and New fee amendment: Office Hearing $227 per hour.
Public Works Department - Solid Waste Transfer / Recycling Facility Green Waste Fees have been updated based on approve rate increase of 8 percent; Non-curbside Collection Surcharge fee updated based on approved rate increase of 8 percent;
Increase to Car Tire (no wheel/rim) free from $2.75 to $3.75; Increase to Car Tire with rim fee from $4.75 to $6.50; Increase to Truck Tire (no wheel/rim) (46” diameter x 12” wide) fee from $8.25 to $8.75; and
Increase to Master lock Padlock for Commercial Waste Receptacles fee increased from $14.75 to $18.00.
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 7
Public Works Department - Airports
Minor language changes – see schedule for details.
Airport Storage Rentals – Regional Airport
Increase to Closed Hangar 30 w/Office fee from $297 to $339; and Increase to Port-A-Port Fee from $370 to $374.
Miscellaneous Fees Benton Field and Redding Regional Airport Increase to Aircraft Tie-Down (single) fee from $52 to $55; Increase to Transit Tie-Down Single fee from $6 to $10; Increase to Transit Tie-Down Twin fee from 47 to $14; Increase to Small Business Jet fee from $22 to $25;
Increase to Helicopter light fee from $6 to $10;
Increase to Helicopter intermediate fee from $9 to $12; Increase to Helicopter medium fee from $12 to $15;
Increase to Helicopter heavies fee from $15 to $20;
Increase to Hanger office – Single fee from $40 to $95; and Increase to Hanger Office – Twin Fee from $69 to $190.
Ground Rental Rate – Benton Field & Regional Airport
Increase to Benton Filed – Non-commercial Fee from $0.042 to $0.050 per square foot per month;
Increase to Benton Field – Commercial fee from $0.034 to $0.045 per square foot per month;
Increase to Regional Airport – Non-commercial Fee from $0.042 to $0.050 per square foot per month;
Increase to Regional Airport – Commercial fee from $0.037 to $0.045 per square foot per month;
Increase facility Rental Rate – Redding Regional Airport Terminal Building fee from $2.00 to $3.54 per square foot per month;
Increase to Landing Fee: Aircraft providing regularly scheduled passenger service from $1.65 to $2.00 per 1,000 lbs;
Increase to Landing Fee: Providing unscheduled passenger service fee from $1.90 to $2.50 per 1,000 lbs;
New fee amendment: Landing Fee – Freight aircraft regardless of weight $2.00 (was part of scheduled and unscheduled passenger fee in the past); Increase to Landing Fee: Aircraft operating from Redding Regional Airport in performance of special contracts for fighting fire or otherwise with federal, state, or county governments fee from $1.50 to $1.75 per 1,000 lbs; and New Fee amendment: RON (remain Over Night) Fee – Scheduled aircraft providing regularly scheduled passenger service $25 per night per aircraft.
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges) Report to Redding City Council June 10, 2026
Re: 4.10(a)‐‐Set Public Hearing regarding adjustments to Schedule of Fees and Service Charges Page 8
Parking
Minor language changes – see schedule for details;
Late Payment Processing fee of $15 is changing to the Public Parking Non-Payment Violations fee as follows;
o $104 if paid within 14 days of the violation date;
o $125 if paid within 21 days of the violation date; and o $150 if paid after 21 days of the violation date.
Miscellaneous Fees
New Fee amendment: Filming $1,000 per day or fraction thereof; and New Fee amendment: Still Photography $500 per day or fraction thereof.
Fees Removed
Electric outlet fee;
Large Aircraft overnight fee greater than 2,500 square feet; Heating or Cooling Equipment installation surcharge;
Facility Rental Rate – Commercial;
Late Payment processing Fee;
Air Stairs;
ADA Jet Aircraft Passenger Ramp;
ADA Commuter Aircraft Passenger Ramp; and
Commercial Mobile Vendor User Vee.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Proposed Draft FY 2026-27 Master Fee Schedule - Red Line Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Previous staff report 4.10(a) 06-16-2026 (6.4--Public Hearing - Adjusting the City's Schedule of Fees & Service Charges)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution appointing Robert Schreeder as Interim Chief of Police pursuant to Government Code section 21221(g) during the approved leave of absence of Chief Barner, effective August 3, 2026, through September 21, 2026; (2) Adopt Resolution appointing Robert Schreeder as Interim Chief of Police Chief pursuant to Government Code section 21221(h), effective September 22, 2026, upon Chief Barner’s retirement, and continuing during the City's recruitment and selection of a permanent Chief of Police; and
(3) Grant the City Manager, or designee, authority to execute the necessary hiring documentation.
Fiscal Impact
The estimated total salary cost for appointing retired annuitant Robert Schreeder on an interim basis to the position of Chief of Police, not to continue beyond 960 hours per fiscal year, would be approximately $133,142.40.
Alternative Action
The City Council may decline to approve the recommended action and provide alternative direction to staff.
MEETING DATE: July 21, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider Resolutions (2) approving interim appointment of Robert Schreeder to the position of Chief of Police for the City of Redding pursuant to Government Code sections 21221(g) and 21221(h).
William S Tarbox, City
Manager
Packet Pg. 597
Report to Redding City Council July 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of Police Page 2 Background/Analysis
As Council is aware, current Chief of Police Brian Barner has announced his retirement effective September 22, 2026, with his last day in the office being June 30, 2026. Captains Brian Cole, Regan Ortega, and Chris Smyrnos are serving on a rotating basis as Acting Chief until such time as an Interim Chief of Police can be administratively appointed.
The recruitment process is currently underway for the next Chief of Police and is expected to be completed by mid-August 2026, with the successful candidate fully transitioned to the position by mid-September to October 2026. Staff believes it is critical to hire an Interim Chief during the term of the recruitment. Robert Schreeder, a CalPERS retiree, has been identified as a suitable candidate who is qualified and willing to serve in the interim role of Chief of Police.
Mr. Schreeder would be re-employed for a limited term, until such time as a Chief of Police is appointed. Mr. Schreeder’s rate of pay while serving as Interim Chief of Police will be $139.69 per hour based on his outstanding qualifications and experience.
To ensure uninterrupted executive leadership of the Police Department, staff recommends appointing Robert Schreeder, as Interim Chief of Police effective August 3, 2026.
During the period of July 1-September 21, 2026, the position is occupied by Chief Barner and therefore is not considered vacant for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law.
Because the status of the Chief of Police position will change upon Chief Barner’s official retirement, two separate statutory authorities govern the interim appointment and CalPERS requires two separate resolutions for the action.
Government Code section 21221(g) authorizes the appointment of a retired annuitant when an incumbent employee is on an approved leave of absence. This authority applies only during the period in which Chief Barner remains employed by the City and is on approved leave (August 3, 2026 - September 21, 2026.)
Upon Chief Barner’s retirement on September 22, 2026, the Chief of Police position will become vacant. At that time, Government Code section 21221(h) becomes the appropriate statutory authority, allowing the City to employ a retired annuitant in a vacant executive position while conducting the recruitment for a permanent replacement.
Accordingly, separate Council approval is required for each appointment because each is based on a different statutory authority and a different employment circumstance.
Staff is requesting approval of both resolutions at this time to ensure uninterrupted executive leadership of the Police Department once the status of the Chief of Police position changes.
While only one appointment authority will be operative at any given time, advance approval allows the City to transition immediately from Government Code section 21221(g) to Government Code section 21221(h), without delaying operations or requiring additional Council action.
The resolutions, if approved, would allow a retired annuitant to be hired to perform the complex duties of the position during the approved leave of absence, recruitment, and hiring process for a new Chief of Police. The interim appointment would be effective August 3, 2026.
Packet Pg. 598
Report to Redding City Council July 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of Police Page 3 Although the same individual is proposed for both interim appointments, the appointments are separate and consecutive. Each appointment is authorized under a different provision of Government Code section 21221 based on the legal status of the Chief of Police position, and the appointments will not overlap.
Environmental Review
This item is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Resolution - Interim Chief of Police, GC Section 21221(g) Resolution - Interim Chief of Police, GC Section 21221(h) Signed Offer letter_Schreeder_Redacted
Packet Pg. 599
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPOINTING ROBERT SCHREEDER AS INTERIM CHIEF OF POLICE
Government Code Section 21221(g)
WHEREAS, Government (Gov.) Code section 21221(g) of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law permits the governing body to appoint a CalPERS retiree to temporarily fill a position for an employee on a leave of absence; and
WHEREAS, the Redding City Council desires to appoint Robert Schreeder as an interim appointment retired annuitant to the position of Chief of Police for the City of Redding under Gov.
Code section 21221(g), effective August 3, 2026 to September 22, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council, the City of Redding and Robert Schreeder certify that Robert Schreeder has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive; and
WHEREAS, the position is available because of a leave of absence granted to a person on payroll status beginning July 1, 2026 for a period not to exceed one year; and WHEREAS, the Chief of Police position requires specialized skills, and Robert Schreeder has the specialized skills required for the position; and
WHEREAS, this Gov. Code section 21221(g) appointment shall be terminated at the end of the leave of absence and is not to exceed one year; and
WHEREAS, the entire employment agreement, contract or appointment document between Robert Schreeder and the City of Redding has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and
WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and
WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for this position is $24,040.00 and the hourly equivalent is $138.69; the minimum base salary for this position is $24,040.00 and the hourly equivalent is $106.68; and
WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to Robert Schreeder will be $138.69; and WHEREAS, Robert Schreeder has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council hereby certifies the nature of the Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Resolution - Interim Chief of Police, GC Section 21221(g) [Revision 1] (9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of employment of Robert Schreeder as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement/contract/appointment document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Chief of Police for the City of Redding by August 3, 2026, because appointment of an Interim Chief of Police is necessary to ensure continuity of leadership, maintain effective department operations, preserve public safety services, support ongoing strategic initiatives, and provide sufficient oversight during the leave of absence of the permanent employee.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_________________ ____________________________________
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN STOCK, Interim City Attorney
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Resolution - Interim Chief of Police, GC Section 21221(g) [Revision 1] (9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of RESOLUTION NO. 2026 ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
APPOINTING ROBERT SCHREEDER AS INTERIM CHIEF OF POLICE
Government Code Section 21221(h)
WHEREAS, Government (Gov.) Code section 21221(h) of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law permits the governing body to appoint a CalPERS retiree to a vacant position requiring specialized skills during recruitment for a permanent appointment, and provides that such appointment will not subject the retired person to reinstatement from retirement or loss of benefits so long as it is a single appointment that does not exceed 960 hours in a fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Redding City Council desires to appoint Robert Schreeder as an interim appointment retired annuitant to the vacant position of Chief of Police for the City of Redding under Gov. Code section 21221(h), effective September 22, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council, the City of Redding and Robert Schreeder certify that Robert Schreeder has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive; and
WHEREAS, an appointment under Gov. Code section 21221(h) requires the retiree is appointed into the interim appointment during recruitment for a permanent appointment; and WHEREAS, the governing body has authorized the search for a permanent appointment on April 14, 2026; and
WHEREAS, this Gov. Code section 21221(h) appointment shall only be made once and therefore will end upon the appointment of the permanent incumbent but no later than July 1, 2027; and
WHEREAS, the entire employment agreement, contract or appointment document between Robert Schreeder and the City of Redding has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and
WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and
WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for this position is $24, 040.00 and the hourly equivalent is $138.69; the minimum base salary for this position is $24,040.00 and the hourly equivalent is $106.68; and
WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to Robert Schreeder will be $138.69; and WHEREAS, Robert Schreeder has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Resolution - Interim Chief of Police, GC Section 21221(h) (9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of Police) THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council hereby certifies the nature of the employment of Robert Schreeder as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement/contract/appointment document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Chief of Police for the City of Redding by September 22, 2026 because appointment of an Interim Chief of Police is necessary to ensure continuity of leadership, maintain effective department operations, preserve public safety services, support ongoing strategic initiatives, and provide sufficient time for the City to conduct a comprehensive recruitment and selection process for a permanent Police Chief.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of July 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_________________ ____________________________________
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN STOCK, Interim City Attorney
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Resolution - Interim Chief of Police, GC Section 21221(h) (9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of Police) Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Signed Offer letter_Schreeder_Redacted (9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of Police) Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Signed Offer letter_Schreeder_Redacted (9.1(b)--Appointment of Retired Annuitant as Interim Chief of Police)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Consider authorizing and approving the following:
(1) Funding for short-term operations and maintenance of the Civic Auditorium at $5,000 in one-time costs and $17,000 per month ongoing cost for a total not to exceed $107,000; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 44th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $107,000 from General Fund Balance for the short-term operations and maintenance of the Civic Auditorium.
Fiscal Impact
Short-term stewardship of the Civic Auditorium will require the City of Redding (City) to fund basic facility maintenance until a new operator is secured. Estimated operating costs are approximately $17,000 per month and include utilities, security, staff time for routine inspections and upkeep, and miscellaneous service contracts such as fire alarms and monitoring. Staff anticipates these costs will be incurred for no more than six months while a new operator is recruited. There are also one-time costs to secure the facility, which include fencing installation, rekeying, and other protective measures, totaling $5,000. All totaled, these costs will not exceed $107,000.
During this interim period, staff expects to receive some event-related revenue, including from the Ironman 70.3 event, which will partially offset operating costs. Because event expenses have not been finalized and no operating agreements are in place, the net revenue impact cannot be determined at this time. Once a new lease is in place, all revenues and remaining budget will be absorbed by the original source.
MEETING DATE: July 21, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.6(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.6(b)--Consider short-term funding for City of Redding's maintenance of the Redding Civic Auditorium located at 700 Auditorium Drive.
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services/Airports
Packet Pg. 606
Report to Redding City Council July 14, 2026
Re: 9.6(b)--Authorize Short-Term Funding for the Civic Auditorium Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize short-term funds for maintaining the Civic Auditorium and provide staff with alternate direction.
Background/Analysis
Advance Redding, the current operator of the Civic Auditorium, issued notice to the City on May 29, 2026, that they were terminating the facility’s lease contract (C-5682). The last day of the lease is July 31, 2026, which is consistent with the 60-day minimum notice required in the agreement. Beginning in August, the City must absorb the ongoing baseline maintenance and security needs of the facility.
Category Monthly Cost Total Requested
Security patrols $1,900 $11,400
Building Maintenance staff $900 $5,400
Maintenance Materials N/A $5,000
Contracts $3,700 $22,200
Utilities $10,500 $63,000
Total $17,000 $107,000
Security patrols will provide multiple daily sweeps of the facility. These patrols are expected to protect the assets within the building and limit instances of vandalism, illegal camping and other unauthorized activity while protecting City assets. Building Maintenance staff time is required for conducting various checks, inspections, and exercising building systems to maintain their integrity and functionality. This work includes using and inspecting plumbing, HVAC, fire, doors, and other systems. Buildings left vacant and unused can see major system failures and additional damage from issues such as unchecked plumbing leaks or HVAC failure causing extreme heat. Regular staff checks and system exercises will be conducted on overtime to not impact staff’s existing duties, eliminating systemwide impacts that can occur when adding new duties.
The funding allows for up to six months of basic facility maintenance while the City issues a Request for Proposals (RFP) to find a new facility operator. The RFP is expected to be issued in late July to early August and it will take approximately two months to have a recommendation for the Council to consider. Following the selection process, there will be several months of negotiation and transition until the new operator occupies the building. Staff believes six months is a realistic timeline for this process.
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental quality Act, and no further action is required.
Packet Pg. 607
Report to Redding City Council July 14, 2026
Re: 9.6(b)--Authorize Short-Term Funding for the Civic Auditorium Page 3 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Budget Resolution
Packet Pg. 608
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 - _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND
ADOPTING THE 44TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION
NO. 2025-049 APPROPRIATING $107,000 FOR THE SHORT TERM
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CIVIC AUDITORIUM FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:
FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
206 7201 Convention Center $107,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:
USE SOURCE
OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
101-0000-2910000-00000 General Fund Fund Balance $ 107,000 Increase (Decrease) Revenue
206-7201-35721450-00000 Transfer From General Fund $ 107,000 Increase Expenditures
101-1099-3583000-00000 Transfer to Convention Center (107,000) Increase Expenditures
206-7201-5095001-00000 Utilities 63,000
206-7201-5050001-00000 Contracts 22,200
206-7201-4703351-00000 Building Maintenance Staff 5,400 206-7201-5040001-00000 Security Patrol 11,400
206-7201-5220001-00000 Maintenance Material and Supplies $ 5,000 Total $ 107,000 $ 107,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $107,000 for the short term operations and maintenance of the Civic Auditorium for fiscal year 2026-27.
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Budget Resolution (9.6(b)--Authorize Short-Term Funding for the Civic Auditorium) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of July, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BENJAMIN L. STOCK, Interim City Attorney
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Budget Resolution (9.6(b)--Authorize Short-Term Funding for the Civic Auditorium)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept an update regarding the City’s Water Utility Pump Station 1 Replacement Project located on the Sacramento River.
Fiscal Impact
The total cost of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) is currently estimated at approximately $74 million, as summarized in the following table.
Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs to Date $7,400,000
Remaining Development Costs through Bid $800,000
Purchase of Environmental Mitigation Credits $1,000,000 Construction Contract + Contingency $58,164,000
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $6,500,000 Post Construction Monitoring $250,000
Total Project Costs $74,114,000
The City of Redding’s Water Utility (Utility) has funded all Project costs to date with Utility funds.
Staff and the design consultant have applied for five grants and two loans for the Project. It was not selected for three of the five grants, and two grant applications remain under review. The two loan applications included:
• A low-interest loan for $50 million through the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) program; and • A $40 million loan through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program.
MEETING DATE: July 21, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Consider report providing an update for the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project.
Michael Webb, Assistant City
Manager/Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 611
Report to Redding City Council July 16, 2026
Re: 9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Page 2 SWRCB staff have indicated that the Project will very likely be included in their fiscal year 2026-2027 funding list and receive the full $50 million SRF loan. Although WIFIA invited the City to submit a full loan application, staff elected not to proceed with the WIFIA loan after determining that the SRF loan would cover the majority of project costs at a lower interest rate.
The following table summarizes grants that were not awarded and the WIFIA loan that staff does not intend to pursue:
Grants/Loans Not
Awarded or Not Being
Pursued
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Amount Status
United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS)
- National Fish Passage
Program Grant 9/19/2023 $2 M
Submitted Pre-App. Not
Selected.
California Wildlife
Conservation Board
(WCB) - Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/19/2023 $5 M
Submitted Pre-App. Not
Selected.
California Department of
Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
- FRGP Grant 4/1/2025 $6 M Submitted app. Not Selected
WIFIA Loan 3/21/2024 $40 M
Approved for full
application, will not proceed
with program
The table below summarizes grants and loans that may still provide funding for the Project:
Potential Grant/Loan
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Amount Status
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) -
Transformational Habitat
Restoration and Coastal
Resilience Program Grant 9/19/2023 $7.7 M
Submitted Application.
Awaiting response.
SWRCB - SRF Loan 9/19/2023 $50 M
SWRCB indicated that
Project should receive
$50M
U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal
Highway Administration
Culvert Aquatic Organism
Passage Grant 3/21/2024 $5.6 M
Submitted Application.
Awaiting response.
Total: $63.3 M
Given the high level of competition for grants thus far for the project, staff considers the likelihood of receiving either remaining grant to be low.
Packet Pg. 612
Report to Redding City Council July 16, 2026
Re: 9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Page 3 Based on the total estimated project cost of $74 million, approximately $7.4 million in project costs incurred to date, and the anticipated $50 million SRF loan, approximately $16.6 million in project costs remain unfunded. Staff is considering the following alternatives to fund the balance:
1. Utilizing Water Utility reserves; and
2. Issuance of municipal bonds.
The Utility currently has approximately $62 million in reserves that could be used, although $42 million is earmarked for other projects. These elevated reserve levels are primarily due to delays in capital improvement project delivery. Utilizing reserves to fund at least the first year of construction would provide flexibility to determine actual construction costs and whether either of the outstanding grant applications receive funding.
Issuing municipal bonds could preserve Utility reserves, but would add to the long-term cost with fees and interest. In addition, bond issuance for amounts below approximately $20 million may not be feasible, so it may be necessary for the Water Utility to bundle other large projects into a bond issuance.
At this time, staff intends to proceed with the $50 million SRF loan, advertise the Project for construction bids in summer/fall 2026, and return to Council at the time of the construction contract award with a budget resolution to fund the remaining project balance using Utility funds. If, during the multi-year construction period, staff determines that issuing municipal bonds would be beneficial for remaining construction costs or other large capital projects, staff will return to Council with a recommendation or request at that time.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1, located on the Sacramento River, will be completely replaced and relocated upriver because it has reached the end of its service life (87 years old), its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its pumping capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands.
On September 19, 2023, March 21, 2024, April 1, 2025, and June 3, 2025, the Council approved the City as an applicant and increased funding request amounts for five grants and two loans associated with the Project, including an SRF loan through the SWRCB. On September 19, 2023, the Council also adopted a resolution authorizing the City to apply for funding through the SWRCB.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. On April 22, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and upon conclusion adopted Resolution number 2025-01 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-2025-00478), thereby adopting the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and approved Use Permit Application UP-2024-01017 for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project.
Packet Pg. 613
Report to Redding City Council July 16, 2026
Re: 9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Page 4 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Location Map
Previous Staff Reports (multiple)
Packet Pg. 614
Packet Pg. 615
Attachment: Location Map (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following relative to the funding of the City of Redding Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the State Water Resources Control Board Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program from $40 million to $50 million;
(2) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act Loan Program from $25 million to $40 million; and
(3) Authorize the City of Redding to increase its funding request amount from the U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) from $6 million to $8 million.
Fiscal Impact
The total costs for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) are currently estimated to be approximately $73 million. The Engineer’s construction cost estimate has increased substantially since the early design phases and is now nearly double the previous estimates from September 2023, when City Council (Council) approved the applications for several grants and loans for the project. Estimated construction costs have increased due to cost escalation, an increase in the pump station building footprint and screen intake sizes, also from what appears to be low cost estimates by the design consultant in previous design phases. Staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the City of Redding’s (City) Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. To date, the Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $17 million for the project. In the future, as opportunities are MEETING DATE: June 3, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve Increases to Grant and Loan Request Amounts to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant Page 2 identified, staff may request Council approval for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project.
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to increase the funding request amounts for these loan and grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1, located within the Sacramento River, will be completely replaced and relocated upriver because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. For additional background and details concerning the project, please refer to the previous staff reports attached.
On September 19, 2023, March 21, 2024, and April 1, 2025, Council approved the City as an applicant for five grants and two loans associated with the project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as well as loans administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). A summary of the grant and loan applications that Council has approved to date, as well as the increased request amounts recommended herein, are provided in Table 1.
Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Approved
Request
Amount
Revised
Request
Amount Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program
Grant 9/19/2023 $2 M Submitted Pre-App.
Not Selected.
WCB - Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/19/2023 $5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.
NMFS - Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/19/2023 $25 M
Preparing
Application.
SWRCB – Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund Loan 9/19/2023 $40 M $50 M
Submitted app.
Coordinating with
SWRCB.
Water Infrastructure Finance
& Innovation Act Loan 3/21/2024 $25 M $40 M Finalizing application.
FHWA- Culvert Aquatic
Organism Passage Grant 3/21/2024 $6 M $8 M Submitted app. Awaiting response.
CDFW – Fisheries Restoration
Grant Program Grant 4/1/2025 $6 M Submitted app. Awaiting response.
Previous Total
(Council Approved to Date): $109 M
Revised Total
(if Approved by Council) $136 M
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant Page 3 The City’s funding request amounts through these loan and grant programs were determined based on funding program limits and estimated project costs. Since the estimated project costs have increased significantly since the Council approved the applications for these grants and loans, it is recommended that funding request amounts be increased for the two low-interest loans, which could be the primary funding source(s) for the project, and the FHWA grant that could fund the Jenny Creek restoration work included in the project.
The City applied for a low-interest Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan through SWRCB in December of 2023 for $40 million, slightly above total estimated project costs at that time. The City’s application and environmental documents are still under review and the City is coordinating with SWRCB. The DWSRF program allows for applications up to $50 million and staff recommends that the application amount be increased to this maximum allowed, based on the current cost estimate for the project.
Staff intends to apply for a Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan through the EPA this summer. The maximum loan request amount through the WIFIA loan program is 49 percent of the total project cost. On March 21, 2024, the Council approved application for up to $25 million through this program, well over 49 percent of the estimated costs at that time. The recommended increase to $40 million is slightly above 49 percent of the current estimated cost.
On March 21, 2024, the Council approved application for up to $6 million through the FHWA Culvert AOP Program for the Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project (described in the May 21, 2024 staff report). The City applied for a grant in September of 2024 and the application is still under review. The recommended increase to $8 million is due to the increased cost estimate.
All of the grant and loan programs noted above are competitive and it is unknown at this point which programs will award funds for the project or how much will be awarded. Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, that could benefit the project and reduce costs to the Utility.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. On April 22, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and upon conclusion adopted Resolution number 2025-01 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-2025-00478), thereby adopting the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and approved Use Permit Application UP-2024-01017 for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 27, 2025
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant Page 4 Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024
Previous Staff Report-04-01-2025
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 620
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.
Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.
The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.
City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.
PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.
PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.
On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.
On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.
The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.
The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.
The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.
City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN
APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL
AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE
APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:
1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.
2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 627
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.
Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.
Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.
PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).
In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.
City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.
City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.
Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.
Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.
CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.
Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.
The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.
Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.
After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.
The panel ranked the firms as follows:
Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.
Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17
CITY OF REDDING
CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).
WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:
SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.
B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.
C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.
D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.
E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.
B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.
C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.
D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.
F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.
G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.
SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.
B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.
C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.
D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.
E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.
F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.
G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.
H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.
Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.
I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.
J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.
K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.
SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:
Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;
3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.
5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.
C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.
At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.
D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.
The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.
E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.
F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.
G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.
H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.
I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.
SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.
If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.
D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.
E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.
SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.
C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.
D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.
E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.
F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.
G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.
H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.
SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.
SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.
B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.
SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.
B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.
C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.
SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:
To City:
City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.
C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.
SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.
B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.
SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).
Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.
Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.
Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.
PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.
The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:
Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.
JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.
JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.
Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.
Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).
Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.
Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.
Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.
Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.
Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.
One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.
The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.
Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.
If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.
Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.
Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.
Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.
Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.
The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.
Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.
JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.
Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase
1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.
JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.
Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.
Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.
Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.
Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.
JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.
JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.
Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.
Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.
This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.
JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.
The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.
Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.
Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.
The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.
Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.
Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 654
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to submit a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act loan application in an amount not to exceed $25 million;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to submit U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) application in an amount not to exceed $6 million with a 20 percent local match of $1.2 million; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the loan and grant submittal process and if awarded loan or grant funds, appropriate the funds, negotiate terms, if any and execute any agreements to implement either the loan or grant.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $46 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The Project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the Project to date.
City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Low-Interest Loan to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under the Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan program or the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) grant and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.
PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component in the City’s water supply system.
PS01 was constructed in 1937 and has been in continual service since, with modifications and upgrades performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989. Staff plans to completely replace and relocate PS01 because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. The replacement station will be relocated approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing location to a deeper pool in the river. The new station will also have increased capacity to meet anticipated future demands, with proposed firm capacity of 42 million gallons per day (MGD) compared to its current capacity of 29 MGD. Project construction is anticipated to start in 2026 with completion expected in 2027 or 2028.
The new PS01 will be located adjacent to the confluence of Jenny Creek to the Sacramento River, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek during the construction of the Project. Jenny Creek is currently conveyed through two culverts beneath the Sacramento River Trail. The culverts are failing and their outlets are typically above the Sacramento River level preventing fish passage, so restoration of Jenny Creek is a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will need to perform at some point. The Jenny Creek restoration work will remove the culverts and restore the open channel, and provide two new bridges for trail access in the area. It will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead from the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the Project.
Jacobs was selected to provide professional consulting services for the Project, including a preliminary design report, environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the project. Within its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying grant and loan opportunities and applying for grants. If application for the WIFIA loan and Culvert AOP Program Grant are approved by the Council, then Jacobs will assist staff with the applications.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
On September 7, 2023, the Council approved the City as an applicant for three grants and one loan associated with the Project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), and a loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A summary of the grants and loans that Council has approved applications for to date, and those that are requested for Council approval herein are provided in Table 1.
Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/7/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.
WCB- Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/7/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.
NMFS- Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/7/23 $25 M $1.5 M Awaiting next
application cycle.
SWRCB- State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan 9/7/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.
Awaiting response.
Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $72 M $3.6 M
WIFIA Loan Pending $25 M Low
Interest
FHWA- Culvert AOP Grant Pending $6 M $1.2 M
Total: $103 M $4.8 M
1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans.
Although the approved request total of $72 million and the total request of $103 million in the table above is much higher than the expected project cost of $46 million, it is unknown which of these funding sources will actually be awarded. The City was not selected for the USFWS National Fish Passage Program and there may be a high level of competition with the other programs. In addition, the eligible project costs through the NMFS grant are probably closer to $5 million (lower than the approved request limit of $25 million shown above), so the maximum funding that could come from the applications that Council has approved to date is likely closer to a maximum of $50 million.
Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the Project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, if approved by the Council, that could benefit the Project and reduce costs to the Utility. If the City is fortunate and is awarded funding from grants or loans in excess of the project costs, then the Utility will utilize funding that will minimize its long-term costs. The Utility’s preferred funding sources are ranked from highest to lowest in the following Table 2.
Funding sources at the top would be utilized over sources at the bottom, as available.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
Table 2- Preferred Funding Source Ranking
Rank Grant/Loan Program Reasons for Ranking
1 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(Principal Forgiveness, 0% interest)
No local match or interest.
2 Grant Programs No interest, but local match will likely be needed. 3 Water Utility Funds Insufficient funds for Project costs, but avoids loan interests.
4 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(with low interest rate)
Very low interest rates.
5 WIFIA Loan Interest rates likely higher than State Revolving Fund.
The WIFIA loan, which staff is requesting approval for application, is ranked the lowest of the identified funding options, but it could still be a good option to fund the Project if the other funding sources will not cover all Project costs. Staff’s intent, if Council approves, is to proceed with the initial steps for the WIFIA loan as a contingency plan to avoid project delays in the event that the other funding options do not become available.
The WIFIA program does not provide grants, but it still has a number of features and flexibilities that make it preferable to municipal revenue bonds and other loan programs for water, wastewater, and stormwater capital projects. Benefits include repayment period flexibility, low interest rates, an opportunity for a one-time renegotiation of the rate to a lower rate during the project implementation period, and lower initial costs/fees than municipal bonds. The repayment period for a WIFIA loan can be up to 35 years and the WIFIA program allows for the opportunity to delay the start of the repayment period up to five years after substantial completion of construction. Interest rates for WIFIA loans are set on the date the loan is closed and based on the U.S. Treasury State & Local Government Series interest rate for a comparable maturity. Interest rates are typically lower than municipal bond rates and currently the rate for a long-term WIFIA loan is approximately 4.4 percent.
The WIFIA loan program includes a two-part application process. If authorized by the Council, staff will proceed with part one of the process, which involves submitting a Letter of Interest to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the EPA selects the Project, then the City would be invited to proceed to part two of the process and apply for the loan. EPA only selects projects that it expects will proceed to closing. If the City were to proceed to part two of the process and submit a full application, then the City would be required to pay EPA an initial application review fee of $100,000 at the time of the application to cover costs for EPA’s external contractors’ (legal, financial and technical) review costs. When the loan is finalized the City would be required to pay the actual costs for EPA’s outside contractors, which are expected to total $100,000 to $150,000, including the initial review fee. The Utility Fund would pay for the application review fees, if necessary, and these review costs could be included in the loan.
Staff intends to proceed with part one of the process, which does not require any fees, and then await responses from the State Revolving Fund and grant applications prior to proceeding with Phase 2 of the WIFIA process and paying any fees, if selected and necessary.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 5
The WIFIA program has a rolling selection process with funding available on an ongoing basis.
It announced in its Fiscal Year 2023 Notices of Funding Availability that up to $7.5 billion of financing will be available. The need for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and the public benefits that it will provide should make it a good candidate for EPA selection for a loan through its WIFIA program.
FHWA’s Culvert AOP Program is a competitive grant program that awards approximately $200 million in grants annually for projects that replace, remove, and repair culverts or weirs and meaningfully improve or restore fish passage for anadromous fish. It provides grants up to $50 million and would require a 20 percent non-federal match. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the Project meets the selection criteria and makes the Project a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.
Environmental Review
Applying for a loan or grant funding is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The design and environmental technical studies are currently under way for the Pump Station 1 Project. These studies will provide the information necessary to ensure CEQA compliance prior to construction.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 660
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.
Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.
The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.
City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.
PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.
PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.
On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.
On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.
The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.
The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.
The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.
City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN
APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL
AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE
APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:
1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.
2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 667
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.
Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.
Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.
PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).
In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.
City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.
City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.
Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.
Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.
CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.
Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.
The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.
Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.
After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.
The panel ranked the firms as follows:
Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.
Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17
CITY OF REDDING
CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).
WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:
SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.
B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.
C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.
D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.
E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.
B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.
C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.
D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.
F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.
G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.
SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.
B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.
C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.
D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.
E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.
F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.
G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.
H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.
Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.
I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.
J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.
K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.
SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:
Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;
3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.
5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.
C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.
At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.
D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.
The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.
E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.
F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.
G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.
H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.
I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.
SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.
If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.
D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.
E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.
SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.
C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.
D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.
E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.
F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.
G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.
H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.
SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.
SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.
B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.
SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.
B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.
C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.
SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:
To City:
City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.
C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.
SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.
B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.
SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).
Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.
Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.
Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.
PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.
The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:
Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.
JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.
JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.
Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.
Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).
Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.
Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.
Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.
Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.
Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.
One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.
The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.
Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.
If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.
Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.
Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.
Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.
Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.
The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.
Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.
JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.
Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase
1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.
JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.
Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.
Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.
Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.
Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.
JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.
JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.
Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.
Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.
This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.
JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.
The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.
Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.
Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.
The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.
Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.
Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 694
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City of Redding to submit an application in an amount not to exceed $6 million to the Fisheries Restoration Grant Program administered by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in partnership with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund; and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the grant, should it be awarded.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are currently estimated to be approximately $55 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the City’s Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the project to date.
If the City Council (Council) approves the California Department of Fish and Wildlife - Fisheries Restoration Grant Program (FRGP) application and funding is awarded for the project, then the FRGP funds could provide for roughly 10 percent of the project costs. In the future, as opportunities are identified, staff may request Council approval for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project.
MEETING DATE: April 1, 2025
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Fisheries Restoration Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council March 25, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for FRGP funds and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 will be completely replaced and relocated upriver because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. For additional background and details concerning the project, please refer to the previous staff reports attached.
On September 19, 2023, and March 21, 2024, the Council approved the City as an applicant for four grants and two loans associated with the project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, as well as loans administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A summary of the grant and loan applications Council has approved to date, including the subject FRGP grant, are provided in Table 1.
Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/19/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.
WCB - Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/19/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.
NMFS - Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/19/23 $25 M $1.5 M Preparing
Application.
SWRCB - State Revolving
Fund Loan 9/19/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.
Awaiting response.
Water Infrastructure Finance
&
Innovation Act
Loan 3/21/24 $25 M Low
Interest
Finalizing
application.
U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal
Highway Administration
Culvert Aquatic Organism
Passage
Grant 3/21/24 $6 M $1.2 M Submitted app.
Awaiting response.
Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $103 M $4.8 M
CDFW - FRGP Grant Pending $6 M $0
Total: $109 M $4.8 M
1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council March 25, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
All of the grant and loan programs listed above are competitive and it is unknown at this point which programs will award funds for the project or how much will be awarded. Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, that could benefit the project and reduce costs to the Utility.
The FRGP is a competitive grant program that has $17 million available this cycle for projects that restore, enhance, or protect anadromous salmonid habitat in watersheds of California. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project, further described in the May 13, 2024 staff report, meets the FRGP selection criteria and the project should be a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023
Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 698
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.
Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.
The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.
City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.
PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.
PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.
On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.
On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.
The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.
The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.
The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.
City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN
APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL
AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE
APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:
1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.
2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 705
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.
Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.
Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.
PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).
In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.
City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.
City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.
Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.
Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.
CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.
Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.
The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.
Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.
After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.
The panel ranked the firms as follows:
Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.
Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17
CITY OF REDDING
CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).
WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:
SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.
B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.
C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.
D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.
E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.
B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.
C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.
D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.
F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.
G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.
SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.
B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.
C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.
D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.
E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.
F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.
G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.
H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.
Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.
I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.
J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.
K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.
SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:
Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;
3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.
5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.
C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.
At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.
D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.
The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.
E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.
F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.
G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.
H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.
I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.
SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.
If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.
D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.
E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.
SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.
C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.
D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.
E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.
F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.
G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.
H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.
SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.
SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.
B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.
SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.
B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.
C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.
SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:
To City:
City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.
C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.
SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.
B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.
SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).
Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.
Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.
Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.
PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.
The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:
Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.
JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.
JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.
Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.
Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).
Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.
Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.
Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.
Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.
Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.
One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.
The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.
Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.
If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.
Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.
Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.
Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.
Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.
The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.
Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.
JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.
Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase
1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.
JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.
Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.
Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.
Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.
Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.
JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.
JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.
Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.
Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.
This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.
JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.
The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.
Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.
Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.
The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.
Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.
Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 732
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to submit a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act loan application in an amount not to exceed $25 million;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to submit U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) application in an amount not to exceed $6 million with a 20 percent local match of $1.2 million; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the loan and grant submittal process and if awarded loan or grant funds, appropriate the funds, negotiate terms, if any and execute any agreements to implement either the loan or grant.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $46 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The Project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the Project to date.
City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Low-Interest Loan to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under the Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan program or the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) grant and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.
PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component in the City’s water supply system.
PS01 was constructed in 1937 and has been in continual service since, with modifications and upgrades performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989. Staff plans to completely replace and relocate PS01 because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. The replacement station will be relocated approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing location to a deeper pool in the river. The new station will also have increased capacity to meet anticipated future demands, with proposed firm capacity of 42 million gallons per day (MGD) compared to its current capacity of 29 MGD. Project construction is anticipated to start in 2026 with completion expected in 2027 or 2028.
The new PS01 will be located adjacent to the confluence of Jenny Creek to the Sacramento River, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek during the construction of the Project. Jenny Creek is currently conveyed through two culverts beneath the Sacramento River Trail. The culverts are failing and their outlets are typically above the Sacramento River level preventing fish passage, so restoration of Jenny Creek is a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will need to perform at some point. The Jenny Creek restoration work will remove the culverts and restore the open channel, and provide two new bridges for trail access in the area. It will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead from the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the Project.
Jacobs was selected to provide professional consulting services for the Project, including a preliminary design report, environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the project. Within its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying grant and loan opportunities and applying for grants. If application for the WIFIA loan and Culvert AOP Program Grant are approved by the Council, then Jacobs will assist staff with the applications.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
On September 7, 2023, the Council approved the City as an applicant for three grants and one loan associated with the Project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), and a loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A summary of the grants and loans that Council has approved applications for to date, and those that are requested for Council approval herein are provided in Table 1.
Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/7/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.
WCB- Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/7/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.
NMFS- Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/7/23 $25 M $1.5 M Awaiting next
application cycle.
SWRCB- State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan 9/7/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.
Awaiting response.
Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $72 M $3.6 M
WIFIA Loan Pending $25 M Low
Interest
FHWA- Culvert AOP Grant Pending $6 M $1.2 M
Total: $103 M $4.8 M
1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans.
Although the approved request total of $72 million and the total request of $103 million in the table above is much higher than the expected project cost of $46 million, it is unknown which of these funding sources will actually be awarded. The City was not selected for the USFWS National Fish Passage Program and there may be a high level of competition with the other programs. In addition, the eligible project costs through the NMFS grant are probably closer to $5 million (lower than the approved request limit of $25 million shown above), so the maximum funding that could come from the applications that Council has approved to date is likely closer to a maximum of $50 million.
Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the Project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, if approved by the Council, that could benefit the Project and reduce costs to the Utility. If the City is fortunate and is awarded funding from grants or loans in excess of the project costs, then the Utility will utilize funding that will minimize its long-term costs. The Utility’s preferred funding sources are ranked from highest to lowest in the following Table 2.
Funding sources at the top would be utilized over sources at the bottom, as available.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
Table 2- Preferred Funding Source Ranking
Rank Grant/Loan Program Reasons for Ranking
1 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(Principal Forgiveness, 0% interest)
No local match or interest.
2 Grant Programs No interest, but local match will likely be needed. 3 Water Utility Funds Insufficient funds for Project costs, but avoids loan interests.
4 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(with low interest rate)
Very low interest rates.
5 WIFIA Loan Interest rates likely higher than State Revolving Fund.
The WIFIA loan, which staff is requesting approval for application, is ranked the lowest of the identified funding options, but it could still be a good option to fund the Project if the other funding sources will not cover all Project costs. Staff’s intent, if Council approves, is to proceed with the initial steps for the WIFIA loan as a contingency plan to avoid project delays in the event that the other funding options do not become available.
The WIFIA program does not provide grants, but it still has a number of features and flexibilities that make it preferable to municipal revenue bonds and other loan programs for water, wastewater, and stormwater capital projects. Benefits include repayment period flexibility, low interest rates, an opportunity for a one-time renegotiation of the rate to a lower rate during the project implementation period, and lower initial costs/fees than municipal bonds. The repayment period for a WIFIA loan can be up to 35 years and the WIFIA program allows for the opportunity to delay the start of the repayment period up to five years after substantial completion of construction. Interest rates for WIFIA loans are set on the date the loan is closed and based on the U.S. Treasury State & Local Government Series interest rate for a comparable maturity. Interest rates are typically lower than municipal bond rates and currently the rate for a long-term WIFIA loan is approximately 4.4 percent.
The WIFIA loan program includes a two-part application process. If authorized by the Council, staff will proceed with part one of the process, which involves submitting a Letter of Interest to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the EPA selects the Project, then the City would be invited to proceed to part two of the process and apply for the loan. EPA only selects projects that it expects will proceed to closing. If the City were to proceed to part two of the process and submit a full application, then the City would be required to pay EPA an initial application review fee of $100,000 at the time of the application to cover costs for EPA’s external contractors’ (legal, financial and technical) review costs. When the loan is finalized the City would be required to pay the actual costs for EPA’s outside contractors, which are expected to total $100,000 to $150,000, including the initial review fee. The Utility Fund would pay for the application review fees, if necessary, and these review costs could be included in the loan.
Staff intends to proceed with part one of the process, which does not require any fees, and then await responses from the State Revolving Fund and grant applications prior to proceeding with Phase 2 of the WIFIA process and paying any fees, if selected and necessary.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 5
The WIFIA program has a rolling selection process with funding available on an ongoing basis.
It announced in its Fiscal Year 2023 Notices of Funding Availability that up to $7.5 billion of financing will be available. The need for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and the public benefits that it will provide should make it a good candidate for EPA selection for a loan through its WIFIA program.
FHWA’s Culvert AOP Program is a competitive grant program that awards approximately $200 million in grants annually for projects that replace, remove, and repair culverts or weirs and meaningfully improve or restore fish passage for anadromous fish. It provides grants up to $50 million and would require a 20 percent non-federal match. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the Project meets the selection criteria and makes the Project a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.
Environmental Review
Applying for a loan or grant funding is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The design and environmental technical studies are currently under way for the Pump Station 1 Project. These studies will provide the information necessary to ensure CEQA compliance prior to construction.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 738
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.
Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.
Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.
The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.
City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.
Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.
PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.
PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.
On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.
On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.
The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.
The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.
The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.
City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN
APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL
AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE
APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:
1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.
2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 745
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.
Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.
Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.
PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).
In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.
City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.
City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.
Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.
Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.
CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.
Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.
The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.
Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.
After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.
The panel ranked the firms as follows:
Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.
Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17
CITY OF REDDING
CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).
WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:
SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.
B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.
C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.
D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.
E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.
B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.
C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.
D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.
F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.
G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.
SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.
B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.
C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.
D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.
E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.
F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.
G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.
H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.
Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.
I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.
J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.
K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.
SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:
Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;
3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.
5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.
C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.
At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.
D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.
The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.
E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.
F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.
G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.
H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.
I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.
SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.
C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.
If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.
D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.
E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.
SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.
C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.
D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.
E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.
F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.
G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.
H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.
SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.
SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.
B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.
SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.
B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.
C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.
SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:
To City:
City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.
C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.
SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.
B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.
SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).
Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.
Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.
Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.
PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.
The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:
Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.
JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.
JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.
Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.
Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).
Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.
Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.
Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.
Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.
Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.
One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.
The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.
Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.
If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.
Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.
Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.
Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.
Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.
The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.
Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.
JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.
Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.
Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase
1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.
Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.
Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.
JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.
Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.
Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.
Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.
Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.
JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.
JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.
Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.
Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.
This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.
JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.
The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.
Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.
Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.
Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.
Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.
The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.
Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.
Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.
Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 772
Attachment: Previous Staff Reports (multiple) (9.11(f)--Accept Update for Pump Station 1 Replacement Project)