Obligee and Obligor have caused this Contract to be executed in their names by their duly authorized representatives listed below.
C
ity of Redlands, California K
S StateBank
Sign
ature Signature
Jaymie
Paavola-Luckert, Vice President
Print
ed Name and Title Printed Name and Title
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
506 of 602
S
chedule (01)
EXH
IBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT
RE: Government Obligation Contract dated as of December 31, 2021, between KS StateBank (Obligee) and City of Redlands, California (Obligor) Bel
ow is a detailed description of all the items of Equipment including quantity, model number and serial number where applicable:
One Hundred Two (102) Body Worn Cameras and Assorted Accessories
Physical Address of Equipment after Delivery :
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
507 of 602
S
chedule (01)
EXH
IBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
RE: Government Obligation Contract dated as of December 31, 2021, between KS StateBank (Obligee) and City of Redlands, California (Obligor) Date
of First Payment: At Closing
Original Balance: $478,065.00
Total Number of Payments: Five (5)
Number of Payments Per Year: One (1)
Pmt
N
o.
Due
Date
Contract
Payment
Applied to
Interest
Applied to
Principal
*Purchase
Option Price
1 A
t Closing $95,613.00 $0.00 $95,613.00 $362,045.42
2 31-De
c-22 $95,613.00 $0.00 $95,613.00 $274,506.03
3 31-De
c-23 $95,613.00 $0.00 $95,613.00 $185,014.51
4 31-De
c-24 $95,613.00 $0.00 $95,613.00 $93,527.33
5 31-De
c-25 $95,613.00 $0.00 $95,613.00 $0.00
By
signing below, Obligor acknowledges that its obligation to make the Contract Payments set forth in Exhibit B to the Contract includes repayment of the principal amount of $478,065.00, together with interest at 0.000%.
Furthermore, the amount financed by Obligor is $453,752.41 and such amount is the issue price of this Contract for federal income tax purposes.
The difference between the principal amount of this Contract and the issue price is original issue discount, as defined in section 1288 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The yield of this Contract for federal income tax purposes is 2.680%. Such issue price and yield will be stated in the applicable Form 8038-G.
C
ity of Redlands, California
Sign
ature
Print
ed Name and Title
*A
ssumes all Contract Payments due to date are paid
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
508 of 602
S
chedule (01)
EXH
IBIT C
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
RE: Government Obligation Contract dated as of December 31, 2021, between KS StateBank (Obligee) and City of Redlands, California (Obligor) I,
the undersigned, hereby certify that I am a duly qualified representative of Obligor and that I have been given the authority by the Governing Body of Obligor to sign this Certificate of Acceptance with respect to the above referenced Contract. I hereby certify that:
1. The Equipment described on Exhibit A has been delivered and installed in accordance with Obligor's specifications.
2. Obligor has conducted such inspection and/or testing of the Equipment as it deems necessary and appropriate and hereby acknowledges that it accepts the Equipment for all purposes.
3. Obligor has appropriated and/or taken other lawful actions necessary to provide moneys sufficient to pay all Contract Payments required to be paid under the Contract during the current Budget Year of Obligor, and such moneys will be applied in payment of all Contract Payments due and payable during such current Budget Year.
4. Obligor has obtained insurance coverage as required under the Contract from an insurer qualified to do business in the State.
5. No event or condition that constitutes or would constitute an Event of Default exists as of the date hereof.
6. The governing body of Obligor has approved the authorization, execution and delivery of this Contract on its behalf by the authorized representative of Obligor who signed the Contract.
7. Please list the Source of Funds (Fund Item in Budget) for the Contract Payments that come due under Exhibit B of this Contract.
Source of Funds : General Fund
By
signing below, Obligor hereby authorizes the General Fund of the Obligor as a backup source of funds from which the Contract Payments can be made.
C
ity of Redlands, California
Sign
ature
Print
ed Name and Title
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
509 of 602
S
chedule (01)
EXH
IBIT D
OBLIGOR RESOLUTION
RE: Government Obligation Contract dated as of December 31, 2021, between KS StateBank (Obligee) and City of Redlands, California (Obligor) A
t a duly called meeting of the Governing Body of the Obligor (as defined in the Contract) held on ____________________________ the following resolution was introduced and adopted:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Body of Obligor as follows:
1. Determination of Need. The Governing Body of Obligor has determined that a true and very real need exists for the acquisition of the Equipment described on Exhibit A of the Government Obligation Contract dated as of December 31, 2021, between City of Redlands, California (Obligor) and KS StateBank (Obligee).
2. Approval and Authorization. The Governing Body of Obligor has determined that the Contract, substantially in the form presented to this meeting, is in the best interests of the Obligor for the acquisition of such Equipment, and the Governing Body hereby approves the entering into of the Contract by the Obligor and hereby designates and authorizes the following person(s) to execute and deliver the Contract on Obligor’s behalf with such changes thereto as such person(s) deem(s) appropriate, and any related documents, including any Escrow Agreement, necessary to the consummation of the transaction contemplated by the Contract.
Authorized Individual(s):
(Ty
ped or Printed Name and Title of individual(s) authorized to execute the Contract)
3. A
doption of Resolution. The signatures below from the designated individuals from the Governing Body of the Obligor evidence the adoption by the Governing Body of this Resolution.
Signature:
(S
ignature of Secretary, Board Chairman or other member of the Governing Body) Prin
ted Name & Title:
(Printed N
ame and Title of individual who signed directly above)
A
ttested By:
(S
ignature of one additional person who can witness the passage of this Resolution) Prin
ted Name & Title:
(Printed N
ame of individual who signed directly above)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
510 of 602
S
chedule (01)
EXH
IBIT E
BANK QUALIFIED CERTIFICATE
RE: Government Obligation Contract dated as of December 31, 2021, between KS StateBank (Obligee) and City of Redlands, California (Obligor) Whe
reas, Obligor hereby represents that it is a “Bank Qualified” Issuer for the calendar year in which this Contract is executed by making the following designations with respect to Section 265 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). (A “Bank Qualified Issuer” is an issuer that issues less than ten million ($10,000,000) dollars of tax-exempt obligations other than “private activity bonds” as defined in Section 141 of the Code, excluding certain “qualified 501(c)(3) bonds” as defined in Section 145 of the Code, during the calendar year).
Now, therefor, Obligor hereby designates this Contract as follows:
1. Designation as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. Pursuant to Section 265(b)(3)(B)(i) of the Code, the Obligor hereby specifically designates the Contract as a “qualified tax-exempt obligation” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. In compliance with Section 265(b)(3)(D) of the Code, the Obligor hereby represents that the Obligor will not designate more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the Obligor in the calendar year during which the Contract is executed and delivered as such “qualified tax-exempt obligations”.
2. Issuance Limitation. In compliance with the requirements of Section 265(b)(3)(C) of the Code, the Obligor hereby represents that the Obligor (including all subordinate entities of the Obligor within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3)(E) of the Code) reasonably anticipates not to issue in the calendar year during which the Contract is executed and delivered, obligations bearing interest exempt from federal income taxation under Section 103 of the Code (other than “private activity bonds” as defined in Section 141 of the Code and excluding certain “qualified 501(c)(3) bonds” as defined in Section 145 of the Code) in an amount greater than $10,000,000.
C
ity of Redlands, California
Sign
ature
Print
ed Name and Title
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
511 of 602
IN
SURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant
to Article V of the Government Obligation Contract, you have agreed to provide us evidence of insurance covering the Equipment.
A Certificate of Insurance listing the information stated below should be sent to us no later than the date on which the equipment is delivered.
Insured: Certificate Holder:
City of Redlands, California KS StateBank
35 Cajon Street 1010 Westloop, P.O. Box 69
Redlands, California 92373 Manhattan, Kansas 66505-0069
1. Equi
pment Description
One Hundred Two (102) Body Worn Cameras and Assorted Accessories Please include all applicable VIN’s, serial numbers, etc.
2. Deductible
The deductible amounts on the insurance policy should not exceed $100,000.00.
3. Physical Damage
All risk coverage to guarantee proceeds of at least $478,065.00.
4. Loss Payee
KS StateBank AOIA (and/or Its Assigns) MUST be listed as loss payee.
5. Rental Interruption / Abatement Insurance
As set forth in Section 5.01(c) of the Contract.
Pl
ease forward certificate as soon as possible to: E
mail: [email protected]
or
F
ax: (785) 587-4016
Pl
ease complete the information below and return this form along with the Contract.
City of Redlands, California
Insurance
Company:
Agent’s Name:
T
elephone #:
Fax #:
Address:
City, Stat
e Zip:
Email:
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
512 of 602
*PR
EFERRED*
*A
s an additional payment option for Obligor, we are now providing the option of ACH (Automatic Clearing House). By completing this form, Obligor is authorizing Obligee to withdraw said payment amount on said date.
DEBIT AU
THORIZATION
I
hereby authorize KS StateBank Government Finance Department to initiate debit entries for the Payment Amount (including, but not limited to, any late fees, rate changes, escrow modifications, etc.). I acknowledge that KS StateBank Government Finance Department may reinitiate returned entries up to two additional times, to the account indicated below at the financial institution named below and to debit the same to such account for:
Contract Number Payment Amount Frequency of Payments
3359
854 $95,613.00 Annual
Begin
ning Day of Month
Mont
h Year De
bits will be made according to Exhibit B of the Contract
I acknowle
dge that the origination of ACH transactions to this account must comply with the provisions of U.S. law.
F
inancial Institution Name Branch
A
ddress City State Zip
Ro
uting Number Account Number
Type o
f Account Ch
ecking S
avings
If the account does not have sufficient funds, KS StateBank Government Finance Department may attempt, but shall have no obligation to continue to attempt to deduct the payment from the account. If the account has insufficient funds when KS StateBank Government Finance Department attempts to deduct a payment, KS StateBank Government Finance Department may terminate the automatic deduction of payments upon notice to borrower and me. Until such time as payment is made, borrower shall be responsible to make such payments, and all other payments that may be due to KS StateBank Government Finance Department regarding the above-referenced loan.
This authority is to remain in full force and effect until KS StateBank has received written notification from any authorized signer of the account of its termination in such time and manner as to afford KS StateBank a reasonable opportunity to act on it.
Obligor Name on Contract
Cit
y of Redlands, California
S
ignature Printed Name and Title
Tax
ID Number Date
95-6000
766
PLEAS
E ATTACH COPY OF A VOIDED CHECK TO THIS FORM!
US
A Patriot Act
US
A Patriot Act requires identity verification for all new accounts. This means that we may require information from you to allow us to make a proper id
entification.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
513 of 602
IN
VOICE DAT
E SENT:
12-07-20
21 BILL TO
: REMIT TO:
CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA KS STATEBANK
ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT
35 CAJON STREET PO BOX 69
REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA 92373 MANHATTAN, KS 66505-0069
FOR INQUIRIES: (877) 587-4054
ACCO
UNT NUMBER PA
YMENT DATE PA
YMENT DUE DATE TOT
AL AMOUNT DUE
335
9854 At Closing At Closing $95,613.00
DESCRI
PTION AMOU
NT
G
OVERNMENT OBLIGATION CONTRACT PAYMENT AMOUNT: $95,613.00 DAT
ED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2021
ONE
HUNDRED TWO (102) BODY WORN CAMERAS AND ASSORTED ACCESSORIES
Addi
tional interest will be assessed on any payment received after the due date.
$95
,613.00
TOT
AL DUE
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
514 of 602
80 38 REVIEW FORM
The
8038 form attached hereto is an important part of the documentation package and must be properly filled out and submitted to the Department of the Treasury in order for you to receive the lower tax-exempt rate. Unless you instruct us otherwise, we have engaged a Paid Preparer to assist in the filling out of this form. The Paid Preparer has filled out the relevant portions of this form based on the current understanding of what is required by the Department of the Treasury. The responses on this 8038 form are based on the dates and amounts which you have requested (structure of the transaction) and which are on the Payment Schedule.
1. Please review our responses for accuracy. If anything is inaccurate, please contact our office so that we can make proper revisions.
2. If the information provided to you on this form is accurate, please sign where indicated and return with the document package.
3. If there are any changes to the structure of the transaction that occur prior to funding which require a change to the 8038 form, we will make such changes and provide notification to you.
4. We will return to you a copy of the 8038 form that was mailed to the Department of the Treasury.
Important Note:
The IRS is now requesting information regarding tax-exempt issuers’ and borrowers’ written policies and procedures designed to monitor post- issuance compliance with the federal tax rules applicable to tax-exempt obligations (boxes 43 and 44). Do not check items 43 and 44 on the 8038 form unless you have established written procedures in accordance with the instructions referenced directly below. If you choose to “check” items 43 and/or 44, please be prepared to provide copies of such written procedures to the Paid Preparer or any representatives of the IRS upon request.
Written procedures should contain certain key characteristics, including making provisions for:
• Due diligence review at regular intervals;
• Identifying the official or employee responsible for review; • Training of the responsible official/employee;
• Retention of adequate records to substantiate compliance (e.g., records relating to expenditure of proceeds); • Procedures reasonably expected to timely identify noncompliance; and • Procedures ensuring that the issuer will take steps to timely correct noncompliance.
For additional guidance on this 8038 form, you can refer to the Documentation Instructions located on the following government website:
http://www.irs.gov/app/picklist/list/formsInstructions.html, or contact your local IRS office.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
515 of 602
F
orm 80
38-G
(Re
v. September 2018)
Department of the Treasury
In
ternal Revenue Service
In
formation Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations ► U
nder Internal Revenue Code section 149(e)
► See separate instructions.
Caution: If the issue price is under $100,000, use Form 8038-GC.
O
MB No. 1545-0720
Part I Reporting A
uthority If Amended Return, check here ►
1 I
ssuer’s name 2 Issuer’s employer identification number (EIN) C
ity of Redlands, California 95-6000766
3a Name o
f person (other than issuer) with whom the IRS may communicate about this return (see instructions) 3b Telephon e number of other person shown on 3a
4 Number a
nd street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite 5 Report number (For IRS Use Only) 35 Cajon Street 3
6 Cit
y, town, or post office, state, and ZIP code 7 Date of issue R
edlands, California 92373 12/31/2021
8 Name o
f issue 9 CUSIP number
Gov
ernment Obligation Contract None
10 a Name
and title of officer or other employee of the issuer whom the I RS may call for more information (see
instructions)
10b Telephon
e number of officer or other
employee shown on 10a
Mr.
Chris Catren, Chief of Police (909) 335-4744
Part II T
ype of Issue (enter the issue price). See the instructions and attach schedule. 11 Edu
cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 12 H
ealth and hospital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 13 Tra
nsportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 14 Pub
lic safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 453,752 41 15 Env
ironment (including sewage bonds) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 16 H
ousing .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 U
tilities .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 18 Othe
r. Describe ► 18
19 If
obligations are TANs or RANs, check only box 19a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► If
obligations are BANs, check only box 19b .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► 20 If
obligations are in the form of a lease or installment sale, check box . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . ►
Part III Description
of Obligations. Complete for the entire issue for which this form is being filed. (a
) Final maturity date (b) issue price (c) Stated redemption price at maturity
(d) Weighted
average maturity (e) Yield
21 12
/31/2025 $ 45
3,752.41 $ N
/A 4.000 years 2.680 %
Part IV Uses of Proc
eeds of Bond Issue (including underwriters’ discount)
22 Pro
ceeds used for accrued interest . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 23 Issue
price of entire issue (enter amount from line 21, column (b)) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 24 Pro
ceeds used for bond issuance costs (including underwriters’ discount) . . . . 24
25 Pro
ceeds used for credit enhancement . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
26 Pro
ceeds allocated to reasonably required reserve or replacement fund . . . . . 26
27 Pro
ceeds used to refund prior tax-exempt bonds. Complete Part V. . . . . . . . 27 28 Pro
ceeds used to refund prior taxable bonds. Complete Part V. . . . . . . . . 28
29 Total (a
dd lines 24 through 28) .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 30 N
onrefunding proceeds of the issue (subtract line 29 from line 23 and enter amount here) . . . . . . . . . . 30
Part V Description
of Refunded Bonds. Complete this part only for refunding bonds. 31 Enter
the remaining weighted average maturity of the tax-exempt bonds to be refunded . . . . . . . . . . . ► y
ears
32 Enter
the remaining weighted average maturity of the taxable bonds to be refunded . . . . . . . . . . . . ► y ears
33 Enter
the last date on which the refunded tax-exempt bonds will be called (MM/DD/YYYY) . . . . . . . . . ► 34 Enter
the date(s) the refunded bonds were issued ► (MM/DD/YYYY) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For
Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 63773S Form 80 38-G (R
ev. 9-2011)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
516 of 602
F
orm 8038-G (Rev. 9-2011) Page 2
Part VI Miscella
neous
35 Enter
the amount of the state volume cap allocated to the issue under section 141(b)(5) . . . . . . . . . . . 35 36a Enter
the amount of gross proceeds invested or to be invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC) (see
instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36a b Enter
the final maturity date of the GIC► (MM/DD/YYYY)
c Enter
the name of the GIC provider ►
37 Poo
led financings: Enter the amount of the proceeds of this issue that are to be used to make loans to other
governmental units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 38a If
this issue is a loan made from the proceeds of another tax-exempt issue, check box ► an d enter the following information:
b Enter
the date of the master pool bond ►(MM/DD/YYYY)
c Enter
the EIN of the issuer of the master pool bond ►
d Enter
the name of the issuer of the master pool bond ►
39 If
the issuer has designated the issue under section 265(b)(3)(B)(i)(III) (small issuer exception), check box . . . . . . . . . . . . ► 40 If
the issuer has elected to pay a penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebate, check box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► 41a If
the issuer has identified a hedge, check here ► an
d enter the following information:
b Name of hedge provider ►
c Ty
pe of hedge ►
d Ter
m of hedge ►
42 If
the issuer has superintegrated the hedge, check box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► 43 If
the issuer has established written procedures to ensure that all nonqualified bonds of this issue are remediated according to the requirements under the Code and Regulations (see instructions), check box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► 44 If
the issuer has established written procedures to monitor the requirements of section 148, check box . . . . . . . . . . . . ► 45a If
some portion of the proceeds was used to reimburse expenditures, check here ► an d enter the amount
of reimbursement. . . . . . . . . . . ► b Enter
the date the official intent was adopted ► (MM/DD/YYYY)
S
ignature
and
Consent
Und
er penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete. I further declare that I consent to the IRS’s disclosure of the issuer’s return information, as necessary to process this return, to the person that I have authorized above.
Signa
ture of issuer’s authorized representative Date Type or print name and title P
aid
Preparer
Use Only
Print
/Type preparer’s name Preparer’s signature Date
Check if
self-emplo
yed
PTIN
H
. Evan Howe 12
/07/2021 P01438994
F
irm’s Name ► B
aystone Financial LLC F
irm’s EIN ► 48-12
23987
F
irm’s Address ► 10
601 Mission Road, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66206 Phone no. (8 00) 752-3562
For
m 80
38-G (R
ev. 9-2011))
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
517 of 602
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting L. 3.
DATE: 02/01/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of Ordinance No. 2930 (Ordinance Text Amendment No. 360), to amend Title 18 of the Redlands Municipal Code by modifying Chapter 18.92.080(B) pertaining to developments standards in the C-3, General Commercial District to allow residential density in accordance with the existing provisions of Measure “U,” and modify the parking requirements for mixed use development and multifamily-attached residential development projects located within one-half mile of a train station (Development Services Director Desatnik)
MOTION(S):
If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:
I move to adopt Ordinance No. 2930.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2930 (Ordinance Text Amendment No. 360), to amend Title 18 of the Redlands Municipal Code by modifying Chapter 18.92.080(B) pertaining to developments standards in the C-3, General Commercial District to allow residential density in accordance with the existing provisions of Measure “U,” and modify the parking requirements for mixed use development and multifamily-attached residential development projects located within one-half mile of a train station.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
518 of 602
DISCUSSION:
The proposed ordinance and staff report prepared for the introduction of this ordinance are available in the City Clerk's office.
ALTERNATIVES:
City Council may elect not to adopt this ordinance update.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Not Applicable
SUBMITTED BY:
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED BY:
Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:
Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Fiscal Impact
Discussion:
Codification: $22/per page affected by the change
Legal Publication: $250
Attachments
Ordinance No. 2930
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
519 of 602
1 L:\ca\Ord\2930 Amending Chapter 18.92 Parking Standards Clean.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2930
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER
18.92 OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING NEW C-3
GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
FOR RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND PARKING STANDARDS FOR MIXED
USE DEVELOPMENT AND MULTIFAMILY-ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL
PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN A ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS FROM A
TRAIN STATION.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2930 would amend Chapter 18.92 of Title 18 of the Redlands Municipal Code to establish certain development standards pertaining to residential density and on
-site parking requirements for mixed-use development, and multifamily-attached residential, projects located both within the C-3 General Commercial District, and within one-half mile of a train station; and
WHEREAS, on October 12, 2021, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance No. 2930 and at which the Planning Commission considered the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, approval of Ordinance No. 2930 is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposal will not cause any significant environmental effects and will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing on October 12, 2021, the Planning Commission
determined that Ordinance No. 2930 is in conformity with, and advances the goals of, the General Plan to create a compact, pedestrian-oriented environment that is consistent in character with downtown Redlands,
while creating the potential to expand the City’s economic opportunities and housing options; and
WHEREAS, on October 12, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that proposed Ordinance No. 2930 be approved; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 65090, on or about January 7, 2022, the City Clerk gave notice by publication in a newspaper of general circulation of the holding of a public hearing at which Ordinance No. 2930 would be considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022, the City Council held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance No. 2930;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
520 of 602
2 L:\ca\Ord\2930 Amending Chapter 18.92 Parking Standards Clean.docx Section 1. The City Council hereby determines that approval of Ordinance No. 2930 is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines implementing CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the Ordinance will not cause any significant environmental effects and will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.
Section 2. Section 18.92.080 of the Redlands Municipal Code, titled “Conditional Uses,” is hereby amended to read as follows:
“18.92.080: CONDITIONAL USES:
A. In the C-3 zone, the following uses may be permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit:
Uses listed in chapter 18.192 of this title.
Audio and film production studios and schools.
Auto repair establishments; no open service bays shall face a public street, or they shall be screened.
Automobile parking garages and lots, public or private.
Beer and wine stores.
Bus terminals and similar transit facilities.
Commercial amusement establishments, such as skating rinks, bowling lanes, amusement machine arcades, pool halls, dance halls, nightclubs, cocktail lounges, taverns and beer and wine bars.
Drive-in stores, such as cleaner, liquor, milk and food.
Drive-through sales and/or service.
Frozen food locker.
Grocery; with alcohol beverage sales.
Hospitals and sanatoriums.
Mechanical or self-service auto wash.
Mortuaries or funeral homes.
Motels.
Open air sales, display and storage, including:
Miniature golf and similar commercial amusement establishments.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
521 of 602
3 L:\ca\Ord\2930 Amending Chapter 18.92 Parking Standards Clean.docx New or used auto, motorcycle and boat sales.
Swimming pools, commercial.
Tool and equipment sales or rental.
Service stations with alcohol beverage sales; all merchandise must be displayed within the building.
Social halls, with alcohol beverage sales.
Specialty food markets with alcohol beverage sales.
B. Residential uses are permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit and (i) may be combined with nonresidential uses as a mixed use development, or (ii) be developed as a multifamily-attached residential project, in an existing building or an entirely new building provided:
1. The residential density permitted shall be that allowed by the R-3 d istrict; provided, however, that for projects deemed exempt from the “Principles of Managed Development” (section
4.2A) of the City’s General Plan, pursuant to section 4.2B, for the reason that the project is determined to be development directly related to a proposed rail station, the floor area ratio shall govern the density/intensity of the project; and
2. For mixed use and multifamily attached residential projects on a property, all or part of which is within a one-half mile radius of a train station, required parking for the residential units shall be provided on site in accordance with subsection (a) below, in addition to that required for the commercial uses in accordance with subsection (b) below. Residential guest spaces and commercial spaces may be shared.
(a) Residential attached units (apartments, condominiums, townhomes):
i. Units up to 999 sq. ft.: 1.0 space per unit.
ii. Units 1,000 to 1,499 sq. ft.: 1.5 space per unit.
iii. Units 1,500 sq. ft. or more: 2.0 space per unit.
iv. Guests: 0.25 space per unit
v.
Live/Work units up to 1,499 sq. ft.: 1.0 space per unit. vi. Live/Work units 1,500 sq. ft. or more: see Commercial.
(b) Commercial uses (retail, restaurant, office, personal services, and neighborhood- serving uses) within mixed use multi-tenant buildings:
i. Ground floor: 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of gross ground floor building area. ii. Upper floors: 1 space per 350 sq. ft. of gross upper floor building area.
3. For mixed use projects on a property not within a one-half mile radius from a train station, required parking for the residential units shall be provided on site, in addition to that required for the commercial uses, in accordance with Chapter 18.164 of this Title 18, except that up to fifty
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
522 of 602
4 L:\ca\Ord\2930 Amending Chapter 18.92 Parking Standards Clean.docx percent (50%) of the required guest parking spaces for the residential units may jointly use the required parking spaces for the commercial uses.”
Section 3. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in the Redlands Daily Facts, a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
_________________________________
Paul T. Barich
, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
523 of 602
5 L:\ca\Ord\2930 Amending Chapter 18.92 Parking Standards Clean.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
524 of 602
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting L. 4.
DATE: 02/01/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of an agreement with LiftOff LLC for the provision of software licensing and consulting services in the amount of $160,000 for the initial term, with an option for four additional extension terms, each in the amount of $130,000 bringing the total compensation during the initial term and four extension terms to an amount not-to-exceed $680,000 (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)
MOTION(S):
If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:
I move to approve the agreement with LiftOff LLC for the provision of software licensing and consulting services in the amount of $160,000 for the initial term, with an option for four additional extension terms, each in the amount of $130,000 bringing the total compensation during the initial term and four extension terms to amount not-to-exceed $680,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the agreement with LiftOff LLC for the provision of software licensing and consulting services in the amount of $160,000 for the initial term, with an option for four additional extension terms, each in the amount of $130,000 bringing the total compensation during the initial term and four extension terms to amount not-to-exceed $680,000.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
525 of 602
DISCUSSION:
The City has successfully utilized on-premise 2010 Microsoft Exchange servers for the last decade. As technology moves to more cloud-based solutions, staff has begun to identify new functionality, applications, services, time, and cost-effective benefits to the migration of the City's current desktop application and on-premise Exchange Server to a cloud-based Office 365 platform. The current solution for Microsoft Exchange is no longer supported and therefore critical patches and other security updates that help keep the City safe from external threats will no longer be available. Moving to Office 365 cloud-based software allows the City to leverage new technology directly supported by Microsoft, providing the most up-to-date enhancements to Microsoft Office products without IT staff resources directly involved. Many federal departments and state and local governments are moving to the platform across the country.
Public sector agencies have traditionally purchased hardware & software assets using a capital expenditure (CapEx) model where large investments in IT are made close to the end of life of the assets they are replacing - every 5-10 years. This model conflicts with the need to constantly stay up-to-date with the latest trends in technology. The real value of "information technology" is in the end-user experience, when technology enhances an employee's productivity & effectiveness. This is usually realized through software, not the underlying hardware infrastructure. By shifting to the cloud and, thereby, to an operating expenditure (OpEx) model, the annual cost may appear to be more, but over time there are significant gains in productivity and the focus remains on providing best in class software to users.
The cloud-based platform would eliminate two existing servers, saving resources and IT staff time normally spent maintaining those on-premise servers. Some other benefits of the Microsoft Office 365 model include:
Advanced data loss prevention features
Enhanced security features from Microsoft to help thwart computer hacking attempts
Improved archiving capabilities in support of the City's data retention policies
Advanced litigation hold and public records request tools Increased mailbox size for staff by up to 100GB
Cloud storage for each licensed user
The City issued a request for proposal (RFP) for professional services to provide Microsoft Office 365 Migration Services as well as Microsoft Office 365 Licenses. The City received fifteen responsive bids. Staff from the Division of Innovation and Technology reviewed and ranked the proposals. LiftOff LLC was
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
526 of 602
selected as the highest ranked consulting firm based on their extensive specialization both in Office 365 migrations and their experience working with over 50 California public sector clients.
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not approve the agreement with LiftOff LLC, and we continue to utilize the on-premises 2010 Microsoft Exchange Servers and Microsoft Office Suites.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Priority Focus Area – C INFRASTRUCTURE
Objective C-1:
Implement Information and Communications Technology Upgrades (Management Services/IT)
SUBMITTED BY:
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
RECOMMENDED BY:
Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:
Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:
Eric Owens, Network Engineer
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2021-22
Revenue Generating: No
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Amount: $160,000
Budgeted Y/N: Yes
Account No.: 604900
Discussion:
The City will pay $160,000 for the scope of services included in the agreement
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
527 of 602
The City will pay $160,000 for the scope of services included in the agreement during the initial term of one year, which covers both implementation and cutover to the new system ($30,000) as well as the costs for the annual subscription for email services ($130,000). The annual subscription costs are anticipated to be lower initially as we migrate users in groups and includes room for additional user licenses during the later terms of the agreement.
The agreement includes four additional one-year terms each at a cost not-to-exceed $130,000, reflecting the annual subscription costs, for a total five-year cost of $680,000. Funding for this agreement is included in the IT Division's Operating Budget. Subsequent years' costs will be included with the division's corresponding budget requests.
Attachments
LiftOff Agreement
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
528 of 602
1 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn
AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This agreement for the provision of professional software licensing and consulting services (“Agreement”) is made and entered in this 1st day of February, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a mun icipal corporation (“City ”) and LiftOff, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT
1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide Microsoft Office 365 licensing and consul ting services for City (the “Services”).
1.2 The Services shall be performed by Consultant in a professional manner, and Consultant represents that it has the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide the Services to City at a level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional consultants in the industry providing like and similar types of Services.
ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
2.1 The Services that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2.2 Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in the performance of this A greement including, but not limited to, any applicable State prevailing wage laws.
ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY
3.1 City designates Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director , as City’s representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services.
ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES
4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit “B,” titled “Project Schedule,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
4.2 The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year from the Effective Date of this Agreement (the “Initial Term”). The City shall have the option to extend the Initial Term of this Agreement by four (4) additional one-year terms (each, an “Extended Term”), on the same terms and conditions, by providing written notice to Consultant at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Extended Term
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
529 of 602
2 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn
4.3 If Consultant’s Services include deliverable electronic v isual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to Cit y, consistent with City Council-adopted policy for the same. It shall be the obligation of Consultant to obtain a copy of such policy from City staff.
ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT
5.1 The total annual compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services shall be in the amount of one hundred sixty thousand dollars ($160,000) during the Initial Term, with four additional one-year extension options (“Extended Terms”) of one hundred thirty thousand dollars ($130,000) bringing the total compensation during the Initial Term and four (4) Extension Terms to an amount of six hundred eighty thousand dollars ($680,000). City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis up to the not to exceed amount in accordance with Exhibit “C ,” titled “Fee Schedule,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
5.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Services performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s invoices shall include a brief description of the Services performed, the dates the Services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of reimbursable expenses related to the S ervices. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant’s invoice.
5.3 Any n otice or other communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (including PDF) , if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice in accordance with this section:
CITY: CONSULTANT:
City Clerk Ronald Braatz, President
City of Redlands LiftOff, LLC
35 Cajon Street 1667 Patrice Circle
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Crofton, MD 21114
Redlands, CA 92373 rbraatz@LiftOff, LLConline.com
[email protected] Phone: (410)419-1591
Phone: (909) 798-7531
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
530 of 602
3 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
6.1 The following insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be maintained by Consultant for the duration of its performance of the Services. Consultant shall not perform any Services unless and until the required insurance listed below is obtained by Consultant.
Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.
A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that Consultant is self-insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “ D,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.
B. Comprehensive General L iability insurance with carriers acceptable to City in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate , for public liability, property damage and personal injury is required. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.
C. Consultant shall secure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.
D. Business Auto L iability coverage, with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This coverage shall include all Consultant owned vehicles used in connection with Consultant’s provision of the Services, hired and non-owned vehicles, and employee non- ownership vehicles. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non- contributing to any insurance or self - insurance maintained by City.
E. Consultant is expressly prohibited from assigning or subcontracting any of the Services without the prior written consent of City. In the event of mutual agreement by the Parties to assign or subcontract a portion of the Services, Consultant shall add such assignee or subcontractor as an additional insured to the insurance policies required hereby and provide City with the insurance endorsements prior to any Services being performed by the assignee or subcontractor.
6.2 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorneys’ fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
531 of 602
4 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn occasioned by any negligent act or omission by, or the willful misconduct of, Consultant, or its officers, employees and agents in performing the Services.
ARTICLE 7 – CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
7.1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.
7.2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
A. Does not make a governmental decision whether to:
(i) approve a rate, rule or regulation, or adopt or enforce a City law; (ii) issue, deny, suspend or revoke any City permit, license, application, certification, approval, order or similar authorization or entitlement; (iii) authorize City to enter into, modify or renew a contract; (iv) grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract; (v) grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item; (vi) adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards or guidelines for City or for any subdivision thereof.
B. Does not serve in a staff capacity with City and in that capacity, participate in making a governmental decision or otherwise perform the same or substantially the same duties for City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position s pecified in City’s Conflict of Interest Code under Government Code section 87302.
7.3 In the event City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests, Consultant shall complete and file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, State ment of Economic Interests , with the City Clerk’s office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk.
ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
8.1 In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, including fees for the use of in - house counsel by a Party.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
532 of 602
5 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn
8.2 Consultant shall not assign any of the Services, except with the prior written approval of City and in s trict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any assignment or attempted assignment without such prior written consent may, in the sole discretion of City, result in City’s immediate termination of this Agreement.
8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor . Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services. Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.
8.4 This Agreement may be terminated by City, in its sole discretion, by providing not less than five (5) days prior written notice to Consultant of City’s intent to terminate. If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant’s compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed S ervices, and (2) any payment due Consultant at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Consultant shall immediately discontinue its provision of the Services and, within five (5) days of the date of the termination notice, deliver or otherwise make available to City, copies (in both hard copy and electronic form, where applicable) of project related data, design calculations, drawings, specificatio ns, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing the Services. Consultant shall be compensated on a pro-rata basis for Services completed up to the date of termination.
8.5 Consultant shall maintain books, ledgers, invoices , accounts and other records and documents evidencing costs and expenses related to the Services for a period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant pursuant t o this Agreement. Such books shall be available at reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant.
8.6 This Agreement, including the Exhibits incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the matters contained herein, and any prior negotiations, written proposals or verbal agreements relating to such matters are superseded by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided for herein, an y amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing, approved by City and signed by City and Consultant.
8.7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflicts of laws provisions. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement shall be tried and
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
533 of 602
6 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn litigated only in the state courts located in San Bernardino County, California, and the federal courts located in Riverside County, California.
8.8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.
CITY OF REDLANDS LIFTOFF, LLC
By: ___________________________ By: _________________________ Paul T. Barich, Mayor Ronald Braatz, President
ATTEST:
___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
534 of 602
7 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
LIFTOFF, LLC will provide Office 365 Guided Deployment Services (GDS) focused on the migration to the Microsoft Office 365 solution. The GDS consulting is delivered using a “Coach/Mentor” approach in which your IT team will be heavily involved throughout t he entire process and will work directly with the LiftOff, LLC consultants. Together, we will work through a series of webinar appointments (typically 1-2 hours each) as we work through project milestones to deploy the system efficiently and successfully. We have found this approach of keeping your IT team invested in the project to be an extremely effective training mechanism; once the project is complete, your IT staff is fully capable of managing and maintaining the system in the future.
LiftOff, LLC’s expertise is laser focused on the Office 365 systems. If you require integration with other third -party applications, you will be responsible for working with your other vendors to remedy issues. For example, phone systems, firewalls, fax systems, anti-spam, anti- virus, archiving, custom code environments, and accounting systems can integrate with Office 365. We will do our best to facilitate, but these integrations will likely require that product vendor.
The Office 365 solution is quickly evolving, and the product roadmap changes frequently.
It is important to understand that some features may be enhanced or modified during the project. The Microsoft TechNet articles are the best source of information today.
Specifically, LiftOff, LLC’s GDS work will:
1.1. Consist of an Office 365 Assessment Workshop where we will complete an analysis of the current email environment and ensure that requirements are captured, core functionality is reviewed, and details for the migration are discussed and reviewed. This planning session will be conducted via phone and typically takes about two hours to complete. Afterwards, we will map on the remainder of the project plan.
1.2. Consist of Setup and Pre-Staging in the Office 365 Admin Console where we will access your portal together and begin the initial configuration the new Office 365 tenant. This will include:
1.2.1. Adding and verifying your email domains in Office 365 to show ownership.
1.2.2. Ensure that the on-premises Active Directory is organized properly for Azure AD Connect/Directory Sync (required for a hybrid migration).
1.2.3. Install and configure Azure AD Connect to synchronize all mail-enabled objects (users, contacts, and groups) from on- premises Active Directory to Office 365/Azure. Typically, a new on-premises server will be required for this purpose.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
535 of 602
8 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn NOTE: This does NOT include the setup, configuration, or support of ADFS or other third-party authentication systems.
1.2.4. Configure and test single sign-on with Azure AD Connect. A group policy will be required for this feature.
1.2.5. Install, configure, and test secure SMTP Relay going through Office 365.
1.3. This is an Exchange to Office 365 migration, and we intend to perform TWO DIFFERENT Microsoft HYBRID migrations. We will complete the first hybrid migration, and then repeat the entire process (minus Admin training) for the second phase of the project. This utilizes the built- in migration tools included with Office 365 at no additional cost. There are many advantages of using the hybrid migration path and we will make every attempt to make this work. In the extremely rare event that the hybrid (Microsoft) wizard cannot be used for email or Public Folders, we will switch to a third- party migration tool (MigrationWiz). Client is responsible for the cost of the migration tool. Migration Configuration will include the following:
1.3.1. Assess the on-premises Exchange environment and adjust the configuration, as needed, to optimize the hybrid process.
The source Exchange server MUST be fully accessible and fully updated for this to work.
1.3.2. Install and configure the Hybrid Configuration Wizard to establish the connection between the on-premises systems and Exchange Online for both mailbox migrations and intra-organizational mail flow.
1.3.3. Migrate the initial batch of users. This is normally one or more IT users who understand the process and potential troubleshooting that may be required post migration.
1.3.4. Provide documentation for end users regarding “What to Expect” and also Mobile Device configuration for the point of cutover.
NOTE: In nearly every migration, all mobile devices (phones and tablets) will need to have their mail profile reconfigured following the mailbox cutover.
1.3.5. Define a migration strategy for the remaining users and assist with any migration complications that may arise.
1.3.6. Migrate public folders from on-premises to Exchange Online.
1.3.7. Once all data is migrated, work with the Client to decommission the hybrid configuration and, if applicable, remove the on-premises Exchange server(s).
1.4. Office 365 IT Admin Training & Tenant Configuration. These training and configuration settings will span 6-10 sessions.
1.4.1. Office 365 Admin Center
1.4.1.1.Review the proper On-boarding process for new users.
1.4.1.2.Review the proper Off-boarding process for former users while maintaining compliance (if needed).
1.4.1.3.Promoting and demoting users with administrative abilities in Office 365.
1.4.1.4.Reviewing the Office 365 Message Center (for upcoming changes) and Health Dashboard (for potential problems).
1.4.2. Exchange Admin Center
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
536 of 602
9 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn
1.4.2.1.Review management of email related attributes such as mailbox sharing, quotas, online archives, etc.
1.4.2.2.Review proper group creation process in the cloud.
1.4.2.3.Setup mail flow rules including inbound message warnings, outbound message disclaimers and Office Message Encryption (if applicable).
1.4.2.4.Setup mobile device rules and policies and review mobile device remote wipe.
1.4.3. Exchange Online PowerShell
1.4.3.1.Setup mailbox activity auditing.
1.4.3.2.Setup unlimited auto-expanding online archive (if applicable).
1.4.3.3.Review resource mailbox management.
1.4.3.4.Disable Microsoft 365 Group creation and review proper methods for creating these groups.
1.4.4. Microsoft Teams Admin Center
1.4.4.1.Review best practices for creating & managing Teams.
1.4.4.2.Configure optimized Teams settings for all users, groups, and Teams themselves.
1.4.5. SharePoint Admin Center
1.4.5.1.Configure best practices for sharing of files and folders in SharePoint, Teams and OneDrive.
1.4.5.2.Configure Sync settings for the organization.
1.4.5.3.Configure default OneDrive size
1.4.6. Review Teams, OneDrive, Office Online & SharePoint
1.4.6.1.Review the Teams app and website
1.4.6.2.Review OneDrive & SharePoint Online and best practices for ingesting files.
1.4.6.3.Review the OneDrive Sync Client and best practices for using it.
1.5. Review Office Online and best options for using Office apps in a browser.
Securing Your Office 365 & Azure Organization. We will work with your IT staff to ensure that all security and compliance best practices are in place by the conclusion of the project.
1.5.1. Security Admin Center
1.5.1.1.Configure appropriate anti-spam, anti-malware, and anti-phishing settings.
1.5.1.2.Configure outgoing message management including protection of unwanted external forwarding.
1.5.1.3.Configure DKIM, DMARC and SPF.
1.5.1.4.Review Secure Score
1.5.2. Compliance Admin Center
1.5.2.1.Configure online compliance retention policies (if applicable)
1.5.2.2.Review eDiscovery/Content Search process.
1.5.2.3.Review the Audit Log and enable Auditing for (non-mailbox) activity in Office 365.
1.5.3. Azure Active Directory Security & Multi-Factor Authentication
1.5.3.1.Review Risky Sign-ins, Risky Users and Risk Detections
1.5.3.2.Configure Risk Event Notifications for Admins
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
537 of 602
10 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn
1.5.3.3.Configure Conditional Access Policies to prevent non-US logins (if applicable), require MFA for Admins (or All Users, if applicable) and block Legacy Authentication.
1.5.3.4.Review Sign-In Logs.
1.5.3.5.Optimize MFA Settings for the organization.
1.5.4. Review best practices for rolling out MFA (if applicable).
1.5.5. This project will NOT include Microsoft’s Endpoint Management or Intune Products.
1.6. Workstation Configuration. LiftOff, LLC will offer guidance and tools for the workstation configuration.
1.6.1. LiftOff, LLC will work with the IT staff to setup an Office Deployment point on the network either as a network share using Microsoft’s Office Deployment Tool or, if available, via System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM).
1.6.2. Review proper configuration of the Outlook desktop client at the point of mailbox cutover. Cached Mode in desktop Outlook is required for Office 365 connectivity.
NOTE: Although LiftOff, LLC will provide guidance regarding workstation configuration and assist with troubleshooting, LiftOff, LLC will NOT be directly responsible for the configuration of the workstations. Your IT staff is onsite and will complete this configuration.
1.7. Post Mailbox Migration. LiftOff, LLC will work with your IT staff to determine the best solution for decommissioning the Exchange hybrid pieces.
1.7.1. If applicable, work with the Client to remove the hybrid connection pieces and shutoff/remove the Exchange systems from the on-premises environment.
1.7.2. Alternatively, if desired, LiftOff, LLC can assist your organization with retaining an Exchange management server. NOTE: This is extremely uncommon and requires continuous administration, updating and upgrading to avoid known security issues with on-premises Exchange.
1.7.3. Update DNS settings facing the Internet and on-premises in Active Directory, as needed, to point all mailbox connectivity and mail flow (if needed) to Office 365/Exchange Online.
1.8. Additional Microsoft Products. This project does not include Microsoft products that aren’t listed in this Statement of Work. For example, this project will not include ADFS, SharePoint website design, PowerBI, Microsoft Flow, Microsoft Project, or add- ons for Teams, Outlook, or Microsoft Office. Although LiftOff, LLC may be able to assist with various questions related to products not mentioned in this Statement of Work, your best source of assistance would be directly through Microsoft’s support.
2. Investment & Payment Structure
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
538 of 602
11 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn
2.1. The cost of the services outlined in Section 1 above is $30,000. This is the client cost and has already factored in any incentives or promotions. The discounted consulting price requires the Client to purchase AOS -G annual licensing through LIFTOFF, LLC for a period of three years. The AOS -G licensing includes a “price -lock” protection for three years. This pricing is valid for 30 days past the date identified in section 3.1. Invoicing is done after the Assessment Process (1.1) and terms are Net 30.
2.2. The client acknowledges that the Office 365 Microsoft Partner, LiftOff, LLC LLC, may receive payments from Microsoft as a result of the consulting done with LIFTOFF, LLC.
2.3. Migration Wiz Premium multi-pass licenses may be recommended for the project. If Client agrees to use Migration Wiz, Client will be responsible for purchasing licenses for all users. Migration Wiz licenses are typically $15 per mailbox. All migration licenses are purchased directly through LIFTOFF, LLC.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
539 of 602
12 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn EXHIBIT "B"
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Task Duration
Kickoff / Assessment 1 Day
Setup new government tenant, add domains, setup Azure AD Connect and setup the hybrid connector 2 Days
Setup Office Deployment Tool & SMTP Relay Solution 1 Day IT Admin Training & Configuration Office Admin Center & Exchange Admin Center 1 Day
Office Admin Center & Exchange Admin Center 1 Day
Office 365 PowerShell 1 Day
Office 365 Security & Compliance 1 Day
Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive and Office Online 2 Days
MFA & Azure AD Premium Security 1 Day
Migrate IT Mailbox(es) 1 Day
Migrate The Rest Of The Mailboxes 2 Days
Migrate Public Folders to 365 1 Day
Hybrid wrap-up 1 Day
Change Autodiscover to point to O365
1 Day
Remove on-premises Autodiscover Internal URI (SCP)
Change Mail Flow To Exchange Online
Review/Setup DMARC, DKIM and SPF
Finalize The Migration & Remove Exchange On-Premises
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
540 of 602
13 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn EXHIBIT "C"
FEE SCHEDULE
G SKU Item Name
Part
Number Term in Months
Price / User /
Month Licenses Cost / Year
LiftOff, LLC
Professional Services
One Time Fee -
Initial Year $30,000
Office 365 Plan G3 AAA-11894 12 $20.00 420 $100,800.00
Exchange Online Plan
2 3NS-00003 12 $8.00 164 $15,744.00
Defender Plan 1 GCC 3GU-00001 12 $2.00 552 $13,248.00
Azure AD Premium 2
MQN-
00001 12 $8.50 2 $204.00
First Year
Total $159,996.00
Years 2-5
Total $129,996.00
This Fee Schedule is an illustration of potential annual Microsoft Office 365 Licensing Costs.
The numbers will fluctuate as City staffing levels increase or decrease, but will likely be much lower annually.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
541 of 602
14 L:\ca\djm\Agreements\LiftOffAgreement.PS-1.1.FY21-0066.docx.jn EXHIBIT "D"
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer , or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self -insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.
CHECK ONE
_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).
_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certific ate of consent to self -insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.
LIFTOFF, LLC
By: Date: ___________________
Ronald Braatz, President
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
542 of 602
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting L. 5.
DATE: 02/01/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of a construction contract with Borden Excavating, Inc. for the 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project in an amount not to exceed $3,555,000, and determine that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15302 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Harris)
MOTION(S):
If City Council determines staff’s recommendations are appropriate, the following motions are provided:
I move that the City Council determine approval of a Construction Contract and construction of the 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project are categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15302 of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and
1. I move that the City Council approve the 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project plans and specifications, and award a Construction Contract to Borden Excavating Inc. in an amount not to exceed $3,555,000.
2. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council determine approval of a Construction Contract and construction of the 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project are categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15302 of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff also recommends that City Council approve the 2021 Water Pipeline Replacement Project plans and specifications, and award a Construction Contract to Borden Excavating, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $3,555,000.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
543 of 602
DISCUSSION:
The 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project (Project) will replace approximately four (4) miles of aging and deteriorated water pipelines. Each year, a portion of revenues generated through water utility rates is used to replace aging water pipelines throughout the City. These pipelines are selected based on maintenance history, inspection records, and coordination with future paving improvements.
MUED staff prepared the plans and specifications in-house and advertised the Project on November 24, 2021. On December 15, 2021, the City Clerk’s office received the following bids:
BID OPENING REPORT SUMMARY
Bidder Bid Amount
1. Borden Excavating, Inc., Calimesa, CA $3,555,000.00
2. MCC Equipment Rentals, Inc., Yucaipa, CA * $3,677,886.48
3. Tryco General Engineering, Rimforest, CA $3,684,204.00
4. The Van Dyke Corporation, Twentynine Palms, CA $3,852,307.00
5. All Cities Engineering, Jurupa Valley, CA * $4,089,707.50
6. Dominguez General Engineering, Inc., Pomona, CA $4,567,588.00
7. E.J. Meyer Company, Highland, CA $4,688,888.00
8. Kirtley Construction, Inc., San Bernardino, CA $4,695,237.00
9. Christensen Brothers General Engineering, Apple Valley, CA $6,144,414.00
10. Weka, Inc., Highland, CA $6,165,912.00
11. J.R. Filanc Construction Company, Escondido, CA * $7,442,608.00 *An arithmetic error was discovered in the bid proposal. Total bid amount was corrected and highlighted in attached bid analysis to identify arithmetic errors but did not affect ranking.
Each bid was reviewed by staff to determine responsiveness to bid requirements and Borden Excavating, Inc. was determined to be the lowest responsive bidder.
Staff recommends awarding a Construction Contract to Borden Excavating, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $3,555,000. The engineer's estimate for the Project is $4,000,000. The Project will be completed within one hundred forty (140) calendar days.
This Project is categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15302 of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act as the Project involves the replacement of an existing utility facility with a negligible expansion of capacity.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
544 of 602
ALTERNATIVES:
City Council may deny the staff recommendations. However, this will result in further deterioration of aging water distribution system piping.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
The Project supports Objective C-9 to replace old and leaking pipelines to reduce water loss and service interruptions.
SUBMITTED BY:
John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director RECOMMENDED BY:
Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:
Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Kevin O. Watson, Utilities Operations Manager
Goutam K. Dobey, Engineering Manager
PREPARED BY:
Gerard Nepomuceno, Associate Engineer
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 21/22
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Budgeted Y/N: Yes
Account No.: 501910
Discussion:
There is no fiscal impact. The cost for this project is included in the FY 21/22 MUED Budget.
Attachments
A. Borden Public Works Contract
B. Bid Opening Report
C. Bid Analysis
D. Location Map
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
545 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
546 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
PUBLIC WORK CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
This Public Work Construction contract (“Contract”) is made and entered into this 1st day of February, 2022, by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter “City”), and Borden Excavating, Inc. ( hereinafter "Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.”
In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all materials and will perform all of the work for the following: 2021 CIP Water Replacement Project , complete all items as required by the Contract Documents (as herein defined) and Specifications for City’s 2021 CIP Water Replacement Project, Project No. 501039 (the “Work”).
2. CONTRACT SUM: City shall pay Contractor the sum of t hree million five hundred fifty five thousand dollars ($3,555,000) as consideration for its performance of the Work in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Contract Documents. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300, Contractor has the option to deposit securities with an escrow agent as a substitute for retention of earnings required to be withheld by City pursuant to an escrow agreement as set forth in Public Contract Code section 22300.
3. TIME FOR COMPLETION: The Work shall be completed within one hundred forty ( 140) calendar days from and after the date of City’s issuance of a Notice to Proceed to Contractor.
4. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Contractor’s failure to complete the Work within the time allowed will result in damages being sustained by City. Such damages are, and will continue to b e, impracticable and extremely difficult to determine. Accordingly, Contractor shall pay to City, or have withheld from monies due to Contractor, the sum of five hundred d ollars ($500) for each consecutive calendar day in excess of the specified time for completion of the Work. Execution of this Contract shall constitute agreement by City and Contractor that five hundred d ollars ($500) per day is the estimated damage to City caused by the failure of the Contractor to complete the work within the allowed time. Such sum is liquidated damages and shall not be construed as a penalty, and may be deducted from payments due the Contractor if such delay occurs.
5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: This Contract incorporates by reference the following: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Contractor’s Proposal, Bid Bond, Agreement, Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, Plans, General Conditions, Special Provisions and Specifications, and any addenda thereto (collectively, the “Contract Documents”).
6. ATTORNEYS' FEES: In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Contract, or the Contract Documents, the prevailing Party in such action, in addition to any costs and other relief, shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees, including fees for use of in-house counsel by a Party.
7. RESOLUTION OF CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS: Claims by Contractor in the amount of three hundred seventy five thousand dollars ($375,000) or less shall be made by Contractor and processed by the City pursuant to the provisions of Part 3, Chapter 1, Article 1.5 of the Public Contract Code (commencing with Section 20104). All claims shall be in writing and include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Nothing in subdivision (a) of Public Contract Code
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
547 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
Section 20104.2 shall extend the time limit or supersede the notice requirements provided in this case from filing claims by Contractor.
8. ELIGIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR: Contractor and all of its subcontractors shall abide by California Public Contract Code, Section 6109, and California Labor Code Sections 1777.1 and/or 1777.7, and certify that they are not debarred and are eligible to work on this project.
9. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT: No assignment by a Party of any rights or interests under this Contract shall be binding on another Party without the written consent of the Party sought to be bound.
10. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: City and Contractor each binds itself and their respective successors and assigns in respect t o all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents.
11. SEVERABILITY: Any provision or part of the Contract D ocuments held to be void or unenforceable under any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon City and Contractor.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
548 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Contract the day and year first written above.
CITY OF REDLANDS
(SEAL)
By:____________________________________
Paul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
(SEAL)
__________________________________________
Name of Contractor
By:_______________________________________
Signature of Authorized Agent
__________________________________________
Title
__________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Agent (if necessary)
__________________________________________
Title
__________________________________________
Contractor's License No.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
549 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Description of Contract: City of Redlands
Municipal Utilities & Engineering Department
2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project
Project No. 501039
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
a. By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. b. By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self - insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.
CHECK ONE
_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires e very employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).
_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certifi cation of workers’ compensation insurance.
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.
Dated this day of , 2022. _____________________________________
(Contractor)
_____________________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________________
(Official Title)
(SEAL)
(Labor Code Section 1861 provides that the above certificate must be signed and filed by the Contractor with the Owner prior to performing the work of the contract.)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
550 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Whereas, the City of Redlands (“City”), State of California, and Borden Excavating , Inc. (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement dated February 1, 2022 (“Agreement”) whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain public improvements (the “Work”), which said Agreement is identified as 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Proje ct, Project No. 501039 and is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
Whereas, said Principal is required under the terms of the Agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of the Work , now, therefore, we, the Principal and, _____________________________, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the penal sum of t hree million five hundred fifty -five thousand dollars ($ 3,555,000) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum we bind ourselves, and our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall faithfully fulfill the one -year guarantee of all materials and workmanship, and shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the City and its elected officials, officer s, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, t here shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligations, all to be taxed as costs and included in the judgment rendered.
As a condition precedent to the satisfactory completion of the Work, the above obligation shall hold good for a period of one (1) year or longer if required by the Agreement after the acceptance of the work by the City, during which time if the Principal shall fail to make full, complete, and satisfactory repair and replacements and totally protect the City from loss or damage made evident during this period from the date of completion of the Work, and resulting from or caused by defective materials or faulty workmanship, the above obligation in penal sum thereof shall remain in full force and effect. The obligations of Surety hereunder shall continue so long as any obligation of the Principal remains.
Whenever the Principal shall be, and is declared by the City to be, in default under the Agreement, the City having performed the City obligations thereunder, the Surety shall promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly, at the City’s option:
1. Complete the Work in accordance with its terms and conditions; or
2. Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Work in accordance with its terms and conditions, and upon determination by Surety of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, arrange for a contract between such bidder and the City, and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Work less the balance of the Agreement price, but not exceeding, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable hereunder, the
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
551 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
amount set forth above. The term “balance of the Agreement price,” as used in this paragraph, shall mean the total amount payable to the Principal by the City under the Agreement and any modifications thereto, less the amount previously properly paid by the City to the Principal.
Surety expressly agrees that the City may reject any contractor or subcontractor which may be proposed by Surety in fulfillment of its obligations in the event of default by the Principal.
Surety shall not utilize the Principal in completing the Work nor shall Surety accept a bid from the Principal for completion of the Work if the City, when declaring the Principal in default, notifies Surety of the City’s objection to the Principal’s further participation in the completion of the Work.
No right of action shall accrue on the bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other than the City named herein or the successors or assigns of the City. Any suit under this bond must be instituted within the applicable statute of limitations period.
The said Surety, for value receive d, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
No final settlement between the City and the Principal shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder whose claim may be unsatisfied.
The Principal and Surety agree that if the City is required to engage the services of any attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall pay the City’s reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.
In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on , 2022.
(SEAL) (SEAL)
(Contractor) (Surety)
BY:
(Signature) (Signature)
Address:___________________________________
__________________________________________
(Seal and Notarial Acknowledgment of
Surety)
Telephone ( )___________________________
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
552 of 602
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Borden Excavating Contract.PW-3.1.FY21-0072.doc.jn
LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND
Whereas, the City Council of the City of Redlands, State of California, and Borden Excavating, Inc. (hereinafter designated as “Principal”) have entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designat ed public improvements (the “Work”), which said agreement, dated February 1 , 2022, and identified as 2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project, Project No. 501039 is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
Whereas, under the terms of the Agreemen t, Principal is required before commending the performance of the Work, to file a good and sufficient Labor and Material bond with the City of Redlands to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9550) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code of the State of California.
Now, therefore, said Principal and the undersigned as corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons employed in the performance of the Agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of three million five hundred fifty -five thousand dollars ($ 3,555,000) for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 3 (commencing with Section 9550) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive not ice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition.
In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and surety above named, on _______________________, 2022.
(SEAL) (SEAL)
(Contractor) (Surety)
BY:
(Signature) (Signature)
Address:_____________________________
(Seal and Notarial Acknowledgement of Surety) ____________________________________ Telephone: ( )___________________
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
553 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
554 of 602
CITY OF REDLANDS
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Bid Analysis
ATTACHMENT "C"
PROJECT No.: 501039 Bid Date: 12/15/2021
2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Estimated Start Date: 2/15/2022 Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price 1 Mobilization (Max. 5% of Total Bid) 1 LS $3,216.00 $3,216.00 $131,349.43 $131,349.43 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 SWPPP 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $8,053.25 $8,053.25 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 3 Traffic Control Plan 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,987.25 $3,987.25 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 4 Construction Survey 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,700.00 $10,700.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 5 8" DIP Water Pipeline 19,044 LF $101.00 $1,923,444.00 $103.26 $1,966,483.44 $104.00 $1,980,576.00 6 12" DIP Water Pipeline 757 LF $120.00 $90,840.00 $135.03 $102,217.71 $104.00 $78,728.00 7 8" Gate Valve 42 EA $2,000.00 $84,000.00 $1,958.46 $82,255.32 $1,980.00 $83,160.00 8 12" Gate Valve 12 EA $3,500.00 $42,000.00 $3,555.81 $42,669.72 $3,480.00 $41,760.00 9 Fire Hydrant 23 EA $8,000.00 $184,000.00 $8,514.42 $195,831.66 $7,280.00 $167,440.00 10 Fire Hydrant w/ Check Valve 3 EA $9,500.00 $28,500.00 $11,154.45 $33,463.35 $9,800.00 $29,400.00 11 1" Service to Existing Meter 306 EA $2,000.00 $612,000.00 $1,701.76 $520,738.56 $2,200.00 $673,200.00 12 Drop Section 25 EA $2,000.00 $50,000.00 $1,868.80 $46,720.00 $1,400.00 $35,000.00 13 Air and Vacuum 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $7,564.81 $7,564.81 $3,980.00 $3,980.00 14 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 6 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,177.99 $3,177.99 $2,980.00 $2,980.00 15 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 6 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,453.32 $4,453.32 $2,680.00 $2,680.00 16 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 6 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,450.11 $4,450.11 $2,180.00 $2,180.00 17 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 7 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,450.11 $4,450.11 $1,980.00 $1,980.00 18 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 8 1 EA $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $6,957.12 $6,957.12 $6,880.00 $6,880.00 19 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 9 1 EA $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $5,921.36 $5,921.36 $6,800.00 $6,800.00 20 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 9 1 EA $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,957.12 $6,957.12 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 21 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 10 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,961.57 $4,961.57 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 22 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 11 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,450.11 $4,450.11 $1,980.00 $1,980.00 23 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 11 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,294.34 $5,294.34 $1,980.00 $1,980.00 24 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 11 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,545.34 $4,545.34 $2,180.00 $2,180.00 25 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 12 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,736.87 $4,736.87 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 26 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 12 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,378.87 $5,378.87 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 27 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 12 1 EA $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,378.87 $5,378.87 $5,600.00 $5,600.00 28 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 13 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,447.97 $4,447.97 $2,980.00 $2,980.00 29 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 14 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,453.32 $4,453.32 $2,980.00 $2,980.00 30 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 14 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,736.87 $4,736.87 $3,280.00 $3,280.00 31 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 14 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,271.87 $5,271.87 $4,980.00 $4,980.00 32 Connection per Detail 4, Sheet 14 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,485.87 $5,485.87 $3,980.00 $3,980.00 33 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 15 1 EA $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,485.87 $5,485.87 $3,280.00 $3,280.00 34 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 16 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,201.87 $4,201.87 $1,480.00 $1,480.00 35 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 16 1 EA $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,753.37 $5,753.37 $2,980.00 $2,980.00 36 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 17 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,201.87 $4,201.87 $1,480.00 $1,480.00 37 Unforeseen work not covered within all other
bid items 1 LS $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 38 Demobilization 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $10,700.00 $10,700.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Additions/Deductions
Total Bid Price $3,555,000.00
Item
No. Bid Item Qty Unit Borden Excavating Inc. MCC Equipment Rentals $3,677,886.48
Tryco General Engineering
$3,684,204.00
Multiplication Error on Bid Items 6,12
and 26 ; Totals are corrected per item
unit price
Low Bidder 1, 2 & 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
555 of 602
CITY OF REDLANDS
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Bid Analysis
ATTACHMENT "C"
PROJECT No.: 501039 Bid Date: 12/15/2021
2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Estimated Start Date: 2/15/2022 Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price 1 Mobilization (Max. 5% of Total Bid) 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 2 SWPPP 1 LS $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 Traffic Control Plan 1 LS $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 4 Construction Survey 1 LS $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 5 8" DIP Water Pipeline 19,044 LF $65.00 $1,237,860.00 $110.00 $2,094,840.00 $138.00 $2,628,072.00 6 12" DIP Water Pipeline 757 LF $115.00 $87,055.00 $137.50 $104,087.50 $188.00 $142,316.00 7 8" Gate Valve 42 EA $2,315.00 $97,230.00 $1,800.00 $75,600.00 $1,800.00 $75,600.00 8 12" Gate Valve 12 EA $4,600.00 $55,200.00 $2,500.00 $30,000.00 $3,100.00 $37,200.00 9 Fire Hydrant 23 EA $9,000.00 $207,000.00 $7,000.00 $161,000.00 $11,000.00 $253,000.00 10 Fire Hydrant w/ Check Valve 3 EA $11,000.00 $33,000.00 $8,500.00 $25,500.00 $13,500.00 $40,500.00 11 1" Service to Existing Meter 306 EA $4,000.00 $1,224,000.00 $2,200.00 $673,200.00 $2,400.00 $734,400.00 12 Drop Section 25 EA $2,500.00 $62,500.00 $2,500.00 $62,500.00 $1,400.00 $35,000.00 13 Air and Vacuum 1 EA $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 14 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 6 1 EA $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $6,700.00 $6,700.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 15 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 6 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 16 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 6 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 17 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 7 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 18 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 8 1 EA $12,850.00 $12,850.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 19 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 9 1 EA $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $8,480.00 $8,480.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 20 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 9 1 EA $12,850.00 $12,850.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 21 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 10 1 EA $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 22 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 11 1 EA $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 23 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 11 1 EA $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 24 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 11 1 EA $3,400.00 $3,400.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 25 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 12 1 EA $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 26 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 12 1 EA $4,300.00 $4,300.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 27 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 12 1 EA $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 28 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 13 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 29 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 14 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 30 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 14 1 EA $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 31 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 14 1 EA $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 32 Connection per Detail 4, Sheet 14 1 EA $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 33 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 15 1 EA $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 34 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 16 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 35 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 16 1 EA $10,200.00 $10,200.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 36 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 17 1 EA $3,400.00 $3,400.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 37 Unforeseen work not covered within all other
bid items 1 LS $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 38 Demobilization 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Additions/Deductions $200,062.00 $200,062.00
Dominguez General Engineering,
Inc.
Total Bid Price $3,852,307.00 $4,089,707.50 $4,567,588.00 The Van Dyke Corporation
Summation error in total bid price
stated; Total price corrected per bid
item unit price
Item
No. Bid Item Qty Unit All Cities Engineering Inc.
Low Bidder 4, 5 & 6
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
556 of 602
CITY OF REDLANDS
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Bid Analysis
ATTACHMENT "C"
PROJECT No.: 501039 Bid Date: 12/15/2021
2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Estimated Start Date: 2/15/2022 Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price 1 Mobilization (Max. 5% of Total Bid) 1 LS $220,395.00 $220,395.00 $86,000.00 $86,000.00 $141,000.00 $141,000.00 2 SWPPP 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 3 Traffic Control Plan 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $74,000.00 $74,000.00 4 Construction Survey 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 5 8" DIP Water Pipeline 19,044 LF $118.00 $2,247,192.00 $128.00 $2,437,632.00 $176.00 $3,351,744.00 6 12" DIP Water Pipeline 757 LF $193.00 $146,101.00 $165.00 $124,905.00 $510.00 $386,070.00 7 8" Gate Valve 42 EA $2,500.00 $105,000.00 $1,700.00 $71,400.00 $2,440.00 $102,480.00 8 12" Gate Valve 12 EA $4,200.00 $50,400.00 $2,900.00 $34,800.00 $4,200.00 $50,400.00 9 Fire Hydrant 23 EA $11,000.00 $253,000.00 $8,300.00 $190,900.00 $12,300.00 $282,900.00 10 Fire Hydrant w/ Check Valve 3 EA $14,000.00 $42,000.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $16,700.00 $50,100.00 11 1" Service to Existing Meter 306 EA $2,800.00 $856,800.00 $3,000.00 $918,000.00 $3,070.00 $939,420.00 12 Drop Section 25 EA $5,000.00 $125,000.00 $5,900.00 $147,500.00 $6,900.00 $172,500.00 13 Air and Vacuum 1 EA $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $7,400.00 $7,400.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 14 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 6 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,300.00 $4,300.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 15 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 6 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 16 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 6 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 17 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 7 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 18 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 8 1 EA $23,000.00 $23,000.00 $12,600.00 $12,600.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 19 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 9 1 EA $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 20 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 9 1 EA $23,000.00 $23,000.00 $5,600.00 $5,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 21 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 10 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 22 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 11 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 23 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 11 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,900.00 $4,900.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 24 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 11 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 25 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 12 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 26 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 12 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $10,400.00 $10,400.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 27 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 12 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,700.00 $8,700.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 28 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 13 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 29 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 14 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 30 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 14 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $9,100.00 $9,100.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 31 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 14 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 32 Connection per Detail 4, Sheet 14 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 33 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 15 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 34 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 16 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 35 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 16 1 EA $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $10,200.00 $10,200.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 36 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 17 1 EA $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 37 Unforeseen work not covered within all other
bid items 1 LS $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 38 Demobilization 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Additions/Deductions
Kirtley Construction, Inc Christensen Brothers General
Engineering, Inc.
Total Bid Price $4,688,888.00 $4,695,237.00 $6,144,414.00 EJ Meyer CompanyItem
No. Bid Item Qty Unit
Low Bidder 7, 8 & 9
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
557 of 602
CITY OF REDLANDS
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Bid Analysis
ATTACHMENT "C"
PROJECT No.: 501039 Bid Date: 12/15/2021
2021 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Estimated Start Date: 2/15/2022 Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price Unit Price Item Price 1 Mobilization (Max. 5% of Total Bid) 1 LS $301,472.00 $301,472.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 2 SWPPP 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 3 Traffic Control Plan 1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 4 Construction Survey 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 5 8" DIP Water Pipeline 19,044 LF $200.00 $3,808,800.00 $234.00 $4,456,296.00 6 12" DIP Water Pipeline 757 LF $220.00 $166,540.00 $267.00 $202,119.00 7 8" Gate Valve 42 EA $2,000.00 $84,000.00 $3,900.00 $163,800.00 8 12" Gate Valve 12 EA $3,200.00 $38,400.00 $5,500.00 $66,000.00 9 Fire Hydrant 23 EA $11,000.00 $253,000.00 $16,000.00 $368,000.00 10 Fire Hydrant w/ Check Valve 3 EA $12,000.00 $36,000.00 $15,000.00 $45,000.00 11 1" Service to Existing Meter 306 EA $2,450.00 $749,700.00 $3,100.00 $948,600.00 12 Drop Section 25 EA $1,800.00 $45,000.00 $6,700.00 $167,500.00 13 Air and Vacuum 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 14 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 6 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 15 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 6 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,100.00 $7,100.00 16 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 6 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,100.00 $7,100.00 17 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 7 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,100.00 $7,100.00 18 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 8 1 EA $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 19 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 9 1 EA $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00 20 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 9 1 EA $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $9,700.00 $9,700.00 21 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 10 1 EA $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 22 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 11 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,100.00 $7,100.00 23 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 11 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,200.00 $7,200.00 24 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 11 1 EA $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $8,400.00 $8,400.00 25 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 12 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 26 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 12 1 EA $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 27 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 12 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $10,100.00 $10,100.00 28 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 13 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 29 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 14 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 30 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 14 1 EA $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 31 Connection per Detail 3, Sheet 14 1 EA $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 32 Connection per Detail 4, Sheet 14 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 33 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 15 1 EA $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00 34 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 16 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00 35 Connection per Detail 2, Sheet 16 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,600.00 $10,600.00 36 Connection per Detail 1, Sheet 17 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00 37 Unforeseen work not covered within all other
bid items 1 LS $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 38 Demobilization 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Additions/Deductions -$88,107.00 -$88,107.00
Summation error in total bid price
stated; Total price corrected per bid
item unit price
J.R. Filanc Construction Company,
Inc.Weka Inc.
Total Bid Price $6,165,912.00 $7,442,608.00
Item
No. Bid Item Qty Unit
Low Bidder 10 & 11
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
558 of 602
2021 CIP WATER PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
LOCATION MAP .
FORD
ST
MILL CREEK RD
W
SUNSET DR
CALIMESA BLVD
E SUNSET DR
E PALM AVE
OPAL AVE
ALTA VISTADR
13TH ST
E HIGHLAND AVE
N
DEARBORN
ST
JUDSON ST
S WABASH AVE
5TH AVE
CRAFTON AVE
S DEARBORN ST
MENTONE BLVD
YUCAIPA BLVD
SANDCANYONRD
YUCAIPA BLVD
N WABASH AVE
AVENUE E
GARDENST
E COLTON AVE
5TH AVE
16TH ST
E SAN BERNARDINO AVE
E REDLANDS BLVD
TEXAS DR
E SUNSET DR
OUTER HWY
DUNLAP BLVD
E LUGONIA AVE
E CITRUS AVE
AVENUE E
E CITRUS AVE
E PIONEER AVE
OAKGLEN
RD
N WABASH AVE
PROPOSED WATER PIPELINE REPLACEMENT
ATTACHMENT "D"
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
559 of 602
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting L. 6.
DATE: 02/01/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of an Amendment to the City's Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for the Interstate 10 at University Street Interchange project; approval of an additional appropriation in the amount of $137,830; and determine approval of this Amendment is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Harris)
MOTION(S):
If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:
I move that the City Council determine approval of the amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for the Interstate 10 at University Street Interchange Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and
1. I move that the City Council approve the amendment to Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for the I-10 University Interchange Project, and
2. I move to approve an additional appropriation of $137,830.3.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council determine approval of the amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for the Interstate 10 at University Street Interchange Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act and approve the
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
560 of 602
amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and appropriate additional funding in the amount of $137,830.
DISCUSSION:
In January 2014, City Council approved a Cooperative Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to define the roles and responsibilities for the design and construction of the Interstate 10 at University Street Interchange Project (Project). The Project is located between Citrus Avenue and Central Avenue, and will widen the on and off ramps, add turning lanes, install traffic signals and construct operational improvements within the existing right-of-way. The initial cost estimate to design and construct the Project was $5.2 million. Pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement, the City is responsible for 17.9% ($912,900) of the total $5.1 million project cost, with the remaining 82.1% ($4,188,000) to be funded by SBCTA. The remaining $100,000 is for project management costs that is the sole responsibility of the City.
In May 2019, SBCTA informed the City that an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement would be needed as the total project cost for the Project had increased from $5.2 million to $5,812,935. This increase was due to the following:
Planning and Design stage costs increased from $700,000 to $969,807.
SBCTA indicated cost increases were a result of changes in the project scope, such as additional Caltrans requirements and modifications to the traffic signal design. In accordance with the Cooperative Agreement, the City's share increased to $173,595, an increase of $48,295.
Project management costs increased to $345,000. In accordance with the Cooperative Agreement, the City is solely responsible for project management costs.
On August 15, 2019, SBCTA provided an update regarding additional University Street pavement improvements required by Caltrans. These upgrades are estimated to cost $380,000, and Caltrans indicated they would contribute $500,000 toward construction of the Project. As a result, the City's share of construction costs decreased from $787,600 to $715,665, a decrease of $71,935.
This increased the City's total Project financial obligation by $221,360. In accordance with the Cooperative Agreement, the total City Project contribution cannot exceed $1,012,900 without executing an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement. On May 19, 2020, City Council approved amendment number 1, increasing the City's Project financial obligation by $221,360. On December
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
561 of 602
16, 2021, SBCTA requested the approval of $770,000 in additional contingency funding to offset the cost for unanticipated construction elements. The City's financial obligation for this request (17.9%) is $137,830. Approval of this request is reasonable and necessary to avoid delay-related construction costs in the future, and requires a second amendment to the Project Cooperative Agreement.
Approval of the amendment to the Cooperative Agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.
ALTERNATIVES:
City Council may decline to sign the amendment to the Cooperative Agreement for Interstate 10 at University Interchange Project.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Not applicable.
SUBMITTED BY:
John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director RECOMMENDED BY:
Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:
Daniel J. McHugh, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:
Goutam K. Dobey, Engineering Manager
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2021-22
Appropriation Required Y/N: Yes
Amount: $137,830
Budgeted Y/N: No
Account No.: 254
Discussion:
Approval of the second amendment to this Cooperative Agreement requires an
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
562 of 602
Approval of the second amendment to this Cooperative Agreement requires an additional appropriation of $137,830 from the Freeway Interchange Fund, which currently has a balance of approximately $3,000,000.
Attachments
Cooperative Agreement Second Amendment with SBCTA
Additional Appropriation Form
Cooperative Agreement R14088
Cooperative Agreement R14088 First Amendment
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
563 of 602
R14088-2
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. R14088
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF REDLANDS
FOR
PLANNING, PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT,
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE (PS&E), RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW),
AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES FOR THE INTERCHANGE AT UNIVERSITY STREET AND INTERSTATE 10 IN THE CITY OF REDLANDS
THIS AMENDMENT No. 2 (AMENDMENT) to the Cooperative Agreement No.
R14088 (AGREEMENT) is made and entered into by and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred t o as AUTHORITY) and the City of Redlands (hereinafter referred to as CITY). AUTHORITY and CITY may be referred to herein as a “PARTY” and collectively “PARTIES”.
RECITALS
A. AUTHORITY and CITY entered into the AGREEMENT on February 5, 2014, to delineate their respective roles, responsibilities, and funding commitments relative to the Project Management, Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW and Construction activities of the Interchange at University Street and Interstate 10 in the City of Redlands (PROJECT); and
B. AUTHORITY and CITY entered into Amendment No. 1 on June 8, 2020; to redefine their respective funding responsibilities based on the revised PROJECT costs, and
C. Due to the construction change orders, an estimated amount of $770,000 needs to be added to the construction contingency to cover the existing and anticipated change orders for the completion of the PROJECT; and
D. The PARTIES desire to amend the AGREEMENT, and its Attachment A, to redefine their respective funding responsibilities based on the revised PROJECT costs and to provide a new, updated, estimated schedule for completion of the PROJECT.
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
564 of 602
2 R14088-2
IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED TO AMEND THE AGREEMENT
AS FOLLOWS:
1. Section III.C of the AGREEMENT is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
To contribute towards the Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW, and Construction phases of the PROJECT cost an amount not to exceed $4,710,845, as shown in Attachment A. The actual cost of specific phase may ultimately vary from the estimates provided in Attachment A, however, under no circumstances is the total combined AUTHORITY contribution to exceed $4,710,845 without an amendment to this Agreement.
2. Section IV.A of the AGREEMENT is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
To reimburse AUTHORITY for the actual costs incurred estimated at $1,027,090 towards the Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW , and Construction phases of the PROJECT cost and $345,000 for AUTHORITY project management for a total amount not to exceed $1,372,090, as shown in Attachment A. The actual cost of a specific phase may ultimately vary from the estimates provided in Attachment A, however, under no circumstances is the total combined CITY contribution to exceed $1,372,090 or AUTHORITY project management costs to exceed $345,000 without an amendment to this Agreement.
3. Attachment A to the AGREEMENT is amended and replaced in its entirety with Attachment A to this AMENDMENT, which is attached to and made a part of this AMENDMENT.
4. PARTIES understand that the PROJECT cost provided in this AMENDMENT is an estimate and there is a potential for cost increases or decreases. If a cost increase becomes apparent, PARTIES agree to work in good faith to amend the AGREEMENT.
5. All other terms and conditions of the AGRE EMENT, including all previous amendments, shall remain in full force and effect.
6. This AMENDMENT is deemed to be included and made part of the AGREEMENT.
7. This AMENDMENT is effective upon execution by AUTHORITY.
--------------------------SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE----------------------------
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
565 of 602
3 R14088-2
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. R14088
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
and CITY OF REDLANDS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
CITY OF REDLANDS
By:___ ________________________
By:__________________________
Curt Hagman Paul T. Barich
President, Board of Directors Mayor, City of Redlands
Date:__________________________
Date:__________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE:
By:____________________________
By:____________________________
Juanda L. Daniel Daniel J. McHugh
Assistant General Counsel
City Attorney
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________
Jeanne Donaldson
City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
566 of 602
4 R14088-2
Attachment A
PROJECT SCOPE
The PROJECT will improve the Interstate 10/University Street interchange ramps, including intersection work, turning lanes and striping. It is anticipated that AUTHORITY will be the lead on all phases of work.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE AND FUNDING TABLE
Public Share: 82.1%
Nexus Development Impact Fee Share (DIF or “Local Share”): 17.9% Local Jurisdictional Split of the DIF Share: Redlands 100% Caltrans Financial Contribution (FCO): Lump Sum $500,000
Project Cost* Public
Share**
DIF
Share
Caltrans
FCO
Planning,
Environmental, Design,
and Right-of-way
$969,807 $796,212 $173,595 $0
Construction
Management
$488,128 $400,753 $87,375 $0
Construction
Capital***
$4,780,000 $3,513,880 $766,120 $500,000
Project Management $345,000 $0 $345,000 $0
$6,582,935 $4,710,845 $1,372,090 $500,000
*Project Cost is based on 2021’s Estimate At Completion, Construction Contract and current and anticipated Construction Change Orders.
**Public Share will be funded with Measure I Valley Freeway Interchange funds. ***Construction Capital cost includes an estimate of $380,000 for the full replacement of pavement structure at University Street added based on Caltrans 100% review comment.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Milestones Estimated Completion Date (Actual)
Environmental Approval (February 2017)
Design Approval (December 2019)
Construction Contract Award (September 2020)
Complete for Beneficial Use March 2022
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
567 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
568 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
569 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
570 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
571 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
572 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
573 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
574 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
575 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
576 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
577 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
578 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
579 of 602
R14088-1
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. R14088
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF REDLANDS
FOR
PLANNING, PROJECT REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT,
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE (PS&E), RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW),
AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES FOR THE INTERCHANGE AT UNIVERSITY STREET AND INTERSTATE 10 IN THE CITY OF REDLANDS
THIS AMENDMENT No. 1 (AMENDMENT) to the Cooper ative Agreement No.
R14088 (AGREEMENT) is made and entered into by and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to as AUTHORITY) and the City of Redlands (hereinafter referred to as CITY). AUTHORITY and CITY may be referred to herein as a “PARTY” and collectively “PARTIES”.
RECITALS
A. AUTHORITY and CITY entered into the AGREEMENT on February 5, 2014, to delineate their respective roles, responsibilities, and funding commitments relative to the Project Management, Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW and Construction activities of the Interchange at Unive rsity Street and Interstate 10 in the City of Redlands (PROJECT); and
B. Pursuant to the AGREEMENT, AUTHORITY is the lead agency for the PROJECT and is responsible for the diligent undertaking and completion of the Planning, E nvironmental, PS&E, ROW , and Cons truction phases of the PROJECT; and
C. The AGREEMENT presently provides that the cost of the PROJECT is estimated at $5,200,000 which includes $100 ,000 for AUTHORITY to provide project management services for the Planning, Environmental, PS&E, ROW, and Construction phases of the PROJECT; and
D. The PROJECT is now estimated to cost a total of $5,812,935 which includes $345,000 for the AUTHORITY to provide project management services for the
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
580 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
581 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
582 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
583 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
584 of 602
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
585 of 602
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting O. 3.
DATE: 02/01/2022
TO: The Successor Agency Board of Directors
SUBJECT: Approve minutes of the regular meeting of December 7, 2021 (Secretary Donaldson)
MOTION:
I move to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of December 7, 2021.
Attachments
Minutes of the regular meeting of December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
586 of 602
MINUTES
Regular meetings of the City Council and the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands held in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, on December 7, 2021 at 5:00 P.M.
Present: Paul Barich, Mayor
Eddie Tejeda, Mayor Pro Tempore
Paul Foster, Council Member
Denise Davis, Council Member
Jenna Guzman-Lowery, Council Member
Staff: Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager; Dan McHugh, City Attorney; Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk; Carl Baker, Public Information Officer; Chris Catren, Police Chief; Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director; Chris Boatman, Facilities and Community Services Director; Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director; Jim Topoleski, Fire Chief; John Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director; Don McCue, Library Director; Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Mayor Barich called the meeting to order and offered those present the opportunity to provide public comment on any item on the agenda for the closed session.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Andrew Christopherson, Head of Grove School, described the partnership the school has built with the City over the last several years and their desire for a shared future vision. The school was looking for clarity when determining whose responsibility it was for the care of the property. Areas to be considered in the review included, increased traffic, security needs and maintenance and repairs.
LATE BREAKING ITEM
Council Member Foster reviewed the need to take immediate action to approve an agenda item be added for Council's consideration related to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission's proposed maps affecting Redlands for the State's Congressional and Legislative Districts. On motion of Council Member Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Tejeda, the City Council, unanimously agreed to add the "late breaking" item to the agenda for discussion, under Communications, as Agenda Item J-4.
CLOSED SESSION
Conference with real property negotiators - Government Code §54956.8 CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
587 of 602
Conference with real property negotiators - Government Code §54956.8 (Facilities and Community Services Director Boatman)
Property: APN 0168-091-07-0000
Agency Negotiators: Charles M. Duggan, Jr.; Chris Boatman Negotiating Party: Aaron Jones, San Bernardino Municipal Water District Under Negotiation: Terms of payment and price of possible purchase of property by City
Conference with real property negotiators - Government Code §54956.8 (Facilities and Community Services Director Boatman)
Property: APN 0292-166-08-0000
Agency
Negotiators:
Charles M. Duggan, Jr.; Chris Boatman
Negotiating Party: Andrew Christopherson, The Grove School Under Negotiation: Terms of payment and price of possible lease amendment or purchase of City property
Conference with real property negotiators - Government Code §54956.8 (Facilities and Community Services Director Boatman)
Property: A portion of the Orange Street Alley, Redlands Agency Negotiators: Charles M. Duggan, Jr.; Chris Boatman Negotiating Party: David Kramer, Cope House
Under Negotiation: Discussion and possible action relating to a license agreement
Public Employee Performance Evaluation - Government Code §54957 (Mayor Barich and Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda)
City Manager 1.
City Attorney2.
Conference with labor negotiator - Government Code §54957.6 (Assistant City Manager McConnell)
Agency Negotiators: Mayor Barich and Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The meeting reconvened at 6:15 P.M. with an invocation by Mayor Barich followed by the pledge of allegiance to the American flag.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney McHugh announced that no reportable action was taken during the closed session.
PRESENTATIONS
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
588 of 602
Children's Choir Holiday Performance
The Redlands Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Children's Choir, performed musical selections celebrating the holiday season.
City's 2021 Holiday Video
Public Information Officer, Carl Baker, presented the City's 2021 Holiday video wishing the community a wonderful holiday season.
Proclamation Fresh Air Challenge Month
Mayor Barich presented a Proclamation to Sherli Leonard and Kathy Behrens, representing the Redlands Conservancy, declaring January 2022, as Fresh Air Challenge Month. They highlighted the upcoming Fresh Air Challenge and encouraged Redlanders to walk a million miles in January.
Recognition of Council Member Paul W. Foster
Expression of Appreciation - Council Member Foster - For his many years of service as a member of the City Council and other commissions, Paul W. Foster received expressions of gratitude and praise from each of his fellow Council Members. He was recognized for his thoughtful insight and strong leadership. Additional presentations, honoring his dedication to serving the community, were made by Third District County Supervisor Dawn Rowe, Sid Sonick, Field Representative for Senator Rosillicie Ocho Bogh and the Hometown Heroes Foundation Board Members Toni Momberger, Mick Gallagher and Jim Nolan. Several members of the public also conveyed their deep appreciation of his commitment, dedication and service. They included, Pamela Ong, Mike Warren, Larry Dierdorff, Judy Cannon, Tabitha Johnson, Neal Waner, Toni Momberger and Mario Saucedo.
Council Member Foster thanked all those with whom he has worked over the years and praised City staff for their commitment to excellence. He described several projects and accomplishments of note during his tenure, including, reducing the City's debt, building reserves, balancing budgets, 125th Anniversary Celebration, Heritage Park, Art Initiative, Heritage Grove off California Street, Gateway beautification projects, PARIS pavement program, the Redlands Rail Project and Measure T.
PUBLIC COMMENT
SBCTA Rail Project Claims - Fernando Ramirez described the difficulties he has faced while attempting to file claims against San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), that have been caused as a direct result of the Redlands Rail Project. He requested assistance from the City in dealing with the agency's outright rejection of his claims.
Thanks & Concerns
- Dennis Bell thanked Paul Foster for his service. He stated there was no accountability with how Measure T monies are spent, and in his opinion, the City has wrongly prioritized cultural amenities over public safety. He added there are too many liquor licenses issued in the City.
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
589 of 602
Preventative Policing - Randall Morris urged the Council to engage in more preventative policing measures throughout the City, especially related to traffic and speeding violations on Orange Street.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the minutes of the regular meeting of November 16, 2021.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Proclamation Fresh Air Challenge Month
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved issuance of a proclamation declaring January 2022 as Fresh Air Challenge Month.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Citrus Preservation Commissioner Appointment
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously appointed Marc Shaw to serve the remainder of a four-year term on the Citrus Preservation Commission ending April 16, 2022.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Municipal Utilities/Public Works Commissioner Appointments
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously reappointed R. Brad Thoms to serve a four-year term on the Municipal Utilities/Public Works Commission ending December 7, 2025; and reappointed Adekunle Ojo to serve a four-year term on the Municipal Utilities/Public Works Commission ending December 7, 2025.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Airport Advisory Board Member Appointment
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously appointed Thomas Cook to serve the remainder of a four-year term on the Airport Advisory Board ending May 1, 2024.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
590 of 602
Library Board of Trustees Appointment
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously reappointed William Hardy Jr. to serve another three-year term on the Library Board of Trustees beginning January 1, 2022 and ending January 1, 2025.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
2022 Local Appointments List
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the Local Appointments List for 2022 as required by Government Code Section 54972.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
City Manager Revised Employment Agreement
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved a revised employment agreement with the City Manager.
On October 19, 2021, the City Council approved a new employment agreement with the City Manager that included a term in the agreement that could not be upheld due to limitations set forth by the Public Employee Pension Reform Act. The new employment agreement has been revised to comply with these regulations, with the overall compensation to remain the same.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Local Roadway Safety Plan Grant Acceptance
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously determined that acceptance of the Local Roadway Safety Plan grant and approval of the agreement to complete the study are exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; accepted the Local Roadway Safety Plan grant from California Department of Transportation; approved a Professional Services Agreement with KOA Corporation in an amount not-to-exceed $73,778.59 to complete a Local Roadway Safety Plan Study; and approved an additional appropriation of $76,000.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Cooperative Agreement Revisions Pavement Program
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved minor administrative revisions to the previously approved Cooperative Agreement with the City of Yucaipa delineating responsibilities for rehabilitating 16th Street, 18th Street, and Florida Street during the Pavement Management Program 2021 Street Resurfacing Project.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
591 of 602
Resolution No. 8275 WWTP UpgradesFinancial Assistance
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously determined approval of Resolution No. 8275 is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved Resolution No. 8275, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to sign and submit a Financial Assistance Agreement application and related documents, on behalf of the City of Redlands, to the State Water Resources Control Board for the planning, design, and construction of the City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades Project.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8276 Approved Contractor List
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously determined that approval of the Resolution is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved Resolution No. 8276, establishing an approved contractor list pursuant to the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8243 Establishing a Crosswalk
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously determined approval of the resolution is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved Resolution No. 8243, establishing a crosswalk on Fifth Avenue at Marion Road.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8278 Investment of City Monies
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8278, authorizing the investment of City monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund and rescinding Resolution No. 8221.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8279 Authorized Signers Union Bank
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8279, updating the authorized signers on all accounts held with Union Bank N.A. and Rescinding Resolution No. 8222.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
592 of 602
Utility Customer Management Database Invoice
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved payment of an invoice to Systems & Software, Inc. for support of the enQuesta Utility Database for Customer Management in an amount not-to-exceed $171,287 for annual software maintenance and support.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Memorandum of Agreement County Sheriff's Department
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the Memorandum of Agreement between the City and the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department regarding officer involved shootings and state reportable in-custody death investigations.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
MOU Loma Linda University Children's Hospital
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Loma Linda University Children's Hospital for use of the Children's Assessment Center; and authorized the Chief of Police to execute the agreement.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Public Safety Foundation Grant Acceptance
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the acceptance of the grant from the Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation in the amount of $19,653.60 for the purchase of ballistic vests for operations personnel.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
MOU Local Fire Agencies Application for Grant Funding
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the Memorandum of Understanding with local fire agencies for the submittal of a regional application to the FY2021 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program for the purchase of safety communication equipment and authorized its execution by the Fire Chief.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Ordinance No. 2929 Recyclables
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
593 of 602
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2929, amending Chapter 13.64 of the Redlands Municipal Code to implement mandatory residential and commercial recycling of commingled recyclables and organic waste.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Salary Resolution No. 8277
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8277, establishing a Salary Schedule and Compensation Plan for City Employees and rescinding Resolution No. 8199.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8285 National Opioids Settlement Agreements
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8285, regarding National Opioids Settlement Agreements; and authorized the Mayor to execute the two Settlement Agreements.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Joint Defense and Confidentiality Agreement
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved the Joint Defense/Common Interest and Confidentiality Agreement with MLC Holdings, Inc. in connection with a legal challenge to the City's approval of the Bergamot Specific Plan Project.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
COMMUNICATIONS
Redlands Conservancy Update
Sherli Leonard presented an update relating to the City's partnership with the Redlands Conservancy and their continued collaboration on historic and preservation issues and open space management. She recapped various projects already accomplished as well as ongoing efforts. These included, assisted saving nine historic structures from demolition, successfully nominated three structures to the National Register of Historic Places; assisted the City adopt the Mills Act and become a Certified Local Government; restored more than a mile of historic cut-stone curbs; work at Herngt ‘Aki’ Preserve; collaboration with Facilities and Community Services to develop trail maps; work at San Timoteo Nature Sanctuary and work at Redlands Gateway Ranch. She thanked City staff and in particular, Director Boatman and Senior Manager Tabitha Kevari.
She highlighted the upcoming Fresh Air Challenge encouraging Redlanders to Walk a Million Miles in a Month. As co-sponsors, the City and the Redlands Conservancy are urging CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
594 of 602
participants to walk, run or bike any trail, path or sidewalk. She invited the public to attend the opening event on January 2, 2022 at Ed Hales Park. For additional information and to register, please refer to the following website: https://redlandsconservancy.org/challenge-2022/
Hometown Heroes Recognition
Council Member Foster commemorated military service members whose banners have been retired from the Redlands Hometown Heroes Military Banner Program. The program recognizes and honors Redlands residents and their immediate family members who are actively serving in, or have been honorably discharged from, the United States Armed Forces. With appreciation for their sacrifice associated with military service to our country, the following banners have been retired:
1. Jeffrey Gonzales, Navy - Banner flown over the streets of Redlands from March 2012 to March 2021
2. Kevin Martin, Air Force - Banner flown over the streets of Redlands from March 2012 to March 2021
3. Amanda Nixon, Air Force - Banner flown over the streets of Redlands from March 2013 to March 2021
4. Linda Villalpando, Air Force - Banner flown over the streets of Redlands from May 2012 to March 2021
Council District 5 Upcoming Vacancy
Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda reported on his outreach efforts to speak with the five former Council Members who live in District 5, Carole Beswick, William Cunningham, Kasey Haws, Mick Gallagher and Jerry Bean. He contacted each of them to determine their interest and availability for filling the upcoming vacancy. Based on the information gathered during phone interviews, he recommended the appointment of former Council Member Mick Gallagher to fill Paul Foster's vacant seat for the remainder of the term. Mr. Gallagher expressed understanding and agreement to not seek election to this position in November 2022 and shared his belief that there should not be an incumbent with an advantage over other candidates running in next year’s election. Mr. Gallagher also has the greatest availability of those interviewed and fits the preferences expressed by Mr. Cunningham and Mr. Haws.
Mayor Barich agreed with this recommendation after his conversations with each of the former Council Members.
Council Members Davis and Guzman-Lowery raised concerns this process lacked transparency and wondered if it was the best way to offer people the opportunity to demonstrate their competency. Council Member Foster suggested Mr. Gallagher would be willing to attend the December 21 meeting, where Council could hold an open and transparent dialogue. Council Members agreed this would provide a way for Council to be more comfortable with this recommendation.
Late Breaking Item - State's Redistricting Commission's Maps Council Member Foster reviewed the California Citizens Redistricting Commission's proposed maps affecting Redlands for the State's Congressional and Legislative Districts. The draft maps currently split the City in half, and he urged the Council to consider authorizing the CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
595 of 602
Mayor to write a letter expressing the City's desire to remain under one Congressional and one State Assembly District. The Council Members voiced strong agreement to maintain one district.
On motion of Council Member Foster, seconded by Council Member Guzman-Lowery, the City Council unanimously authorized the Mayor to sign a letter directed to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, expressing the City's desire to remain under one Congressional and one State Assembly District.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Historic Designation Redlands Masonic Lodge
Mayor Barich opened the public hearing and called upon Loralee Farris, of Development Services, for a summary of Resolution No. 8281, designating a three-story brick building as a Local Historic Resource. The building has been utilized as the Redlands Masonic Lodge and is located at 131 Cajon Street. With no further discussion, the Mayor closed the hearing.
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8281 (Historic Designation No. 137), designating as a Local Historic Resource, a three-story brick building utilized as the Redlands Masonic Lodge located at 131 Cajon Street; and determined approval of the resolution is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8280 Street Vacation New York Street
Mayor Barich opened the public hearing and called on Development Services Director Desatnik, for a summary of a proposed street vacation, located within the Esri campus at 370 - 404 New York Street and included a proposed grant of Quitclaim Deed to release the City's pedestrian access easement between West State Street and New York Street to the property owner. One written comment was received from Southern California Gas Company and Director Desatnik confirmed the Gas Company's request that a permanent easement be reserved and excepted from this vacation, was accomplished through this action. With no further discussion, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8280, to vacate approximately 415 linear feet of public right-of-way adjacent to the frontage of the parcels identified as 370 - 404 New York Street in the Administrative Professional (A-P) District and situated within the ESRI campus, at the request of NYS, LLC; determined approval of this Quitclaim Deed to release the City of Redlands access easement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved the Quitclaim Deed to release the City pedestrian access easement between West CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
596 of 602
State Street and New York Street to the property owner, NYS, LLC.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Development Project Redlands Palm Investments, LLC
Mayor Barich opened the public hearing and called on Sean Reilly, of Development Services, for details of the project and a timeline of events related to the development applications from Redlands Palm Investments, LLC for a Planned Residential Development on approximately 6.8 acres consisting of 28 single-family residential lots located on the southeast corner of West Palm Avenue and Alvarado Street. On September 7, 2021, The City Council voted to recirculate the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for 30 days to allow an additional opportunity for the public and State agencies to provide comments on the environmental document. The MND was recirculated from September 20 to October 19, 2021, with seven comments received, six from Redlands residents and one from San Manuel Band of Mission Indians.
A brief recess was taken at 8:07 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 P.M.
As public comment, Carole Beswick and Brett Waterman spoke in support of the development, stating the project will provide much needed housing for those who want to downsize, and they commended the developer for choosing to save the historic structures on the property. Richard O'Donnell, Thomas Cook, Dana Strunk, Luann Benton, Edith Allen (read by Ms. Benton), Kathleen Beall, John Beall, Elisabeth Longo, Andy Hoder and Jim Lynch voiced their perspectives in opposition to the project, citing reasons which included, the loss of a historic grove that is more than 100 years old and represents the City's agricultural heritage, zone designation conflicts with Measure U requirements, the integrity of the developer, increased traffic and noise and possible environmental contaminants, such as perchlorate and the need to undertake a full environmental impact study. It was also suggested the City should purchase the property in partnership with the Conservancy as a way to save the groves and preserve its legacy. Thirteen written comments, including one from John G.
McClendon, of Leibold McClendon & Mann, were received. Each communicated their opposition to the project. City Attorney McHugh clarified the property had not been rezoned since the 1950s, and he added that evidence of contaminants, such as perchlorate, were not discovered in this area of town, but rather several years ago, such contaminants were found on the north side of town, with the discovery resulting in a settlement agreement with Lockheed.
The Applicant was represented by Peter Pitassi, Mark Ostoich and Matt Jordan. They stood behind LSA, the consultant who prepared the Initial Study and MND, declaring the company demonstrated expert technical competency. They added the project balanced a demand for more housing in the area yet respected the preservation of the historic structures and a portion of the groves, as well.
Mayor Barich closed the public hearing. Council Members were pleased the development managed to preserve the structures on the property and even though all the groves would not be saved, they saw value in the compromises made by Redlands Palm Investments. Mayor Barich thought the project would fit quite nicely in the neighborhood. Council Member Guzman-Lowery reminded everyone that preservation efforts were also needed on the north side of town.
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
597 of 602
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8242, to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program prepared for the proposed project in accordance with Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines; and to adopt Redlands Palm Investments, LLC development applications as follows: Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study prepared for the proposed project in accordance with Measure U; Tentative Parcel Map No. 20185 to subdivide an approximately 8.8 acre parcel into four lots described as follows: Parcel 1 (1.54 acres) for the preservation of an existing single family home located on West Palm Avenue; Parcel 2 (0.45 acre) for the preservation of existing citrus grove located at the southeast corner of West Palm Avenue and Alvarado Street; Parcel 3 (0.82 acre) for the preservation of an existing single-family home located on Alvarado Street; Parcel 4 for the creation of a 6.0-acre portion to be further subdivided by Tentative Tract Map No. 20305 into 28 residential lots. The subject parcel is located at 301 West Palm Avenue (APN:
0173-231-05-0000
); Conditional Use Permit No. 1143 for a Planned Residential Development on approximately 6.8 acres consisting of 28 single-family residential lots and five open space lots located on the southeast corner of West Palm Avenue and Alvarado Street, in the Residential Suburban (R-S) District; Tentative Tract Map No. 20305 to subdivide Parcels 3 and 4 (6.82 acres) of Tentative Parcel Map No. 20185 into 28 lots for future single-family residential development and five lettered lots for open space, located on the southeast corner of West Palm Avenue and Alvarado Street, in the Residential Suburban (R-S) District; Variance No. 810 to deviate from the required yard requirements contained in Redlands Municipal Code Section 18.152.040 (Exceptions for Large Scale Developments; Yard Variances for Housing) which states that the front yard requirements may be varied by not more than five feet (5') in either direction, provided that the average front yard for the entire frontage is not less than that required in the district. Approval of the requested Variance would allow a minimum front yard setback of 18 feet and a maximum setback of 62 feet, and would affect lots 6 and 8 in the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 20305: Variance No. 811 to deviate from Redlands Municipal Code Section 18.152.070(G)(1) (Exceptions for Projections into Yards) which allows for portions of a main building on a residential lot to project into the rear yard setback to within 10 feet of the rear property line, provided that the projection is less than 30 feet wide, and if rear yard open space is provided with a minimum dimension of 15 feet and area of 2,100 square-feet. Approval of the requested Variance would allow a reduction to the required minimum rear yard open space to 1,112 square-feet, and would affect a total of 20 lots in the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 20305.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
NEW BUSINESS
Contract Award 2021 CIP Sewer Pipeline Replacement Project
Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Harris introduced a construction contract for the 2021 CIP Sewer Pipeline Replacement Project.
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council unanimously determined that approval of a Construction Contract with Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. for the 2021 CIP Sewer Pipeline Replacement Project is categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15302 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; approved the 2021 CIP Sewer Pipeline Replacement Project plans and specifications; and CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
598 of 602
awarded a Construction Contract with Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. in the amount of $309,852.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
2020 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Amendment
Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Harris explained the need to amend the 2020 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Contract with Tryco General Engineering. The Consultant's compensation will be increased by $308,400.
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously approved the First Amendment to the 2020 CIP Water Pipeline Replacement Project Contract with Tryco General Engineering to increase the Consultant's compensation by $308,400.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8271 WWTP Upgrades Project
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Paul Foster, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 8271, adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program prepared for the proposed Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades Project; approving the plans and specifications for the Project; and authorizing the Project's undertaking by the City.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Water Distribution System SCADA Upgrade Project
On motion of Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously determined that approval of the agreement with TESCO Controls, Inc. for the FY 21/22 Water Distribution System SCADA Upgrade Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved the agreement to perform non-professional services for improvement to public buildings and grounds with TESCO Controls, Inc. for the FY 21/22 Water Distribution System SCADA Upgrade Project in an amount not-to-exceed $3,679,720.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Redlands Gateway Ranch Project
On motion of Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously determined approval of the License Agreement with David Roche Construction to construct an open canopy on City property located at 31313 Live Oak Canyon Road, Redlands Gateway Ranch, is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15303(e) of the State's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved the License Agreement with David Roche.
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
599 of 602
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Pickleball Courts
Facilities and Community Services Director Boatman discussed the construction contract with Three Peaks Corporation for the conversion of two tennis courts into eight pickleball courts at the Redlands Community Center. One of the fastest-growing sports within the City is pickleball with the Recreation division experiencing significant growth in pickleball court use and demand for facilities. To address the increased demand, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission identified the construction of additional pickleball facilities as first on their list of priorities. As public comment, Bob Mitchell, a member of USA Pickleball, urged the Council to move forward with the proposed project.
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Sections 15301(e) and 15304(a) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; approved an additional appropriation in the amount of $100,387 from the unappropriated fund balance for the Parks and Recreation category of the Nevada Palmetto reserve; approved an additional appropriation in the amount of $88,773 from the Park Development Fund; and awarded a construction contract with Three Peaks Corporation in the amount of $309,160 for the conversion of tennis courts to pickleball courts at the Redlands Community Center.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
Oriental Avenue Renaming
Catherine Lin, of Development Services, recapped staff's efforts related to a request to consider renaming Oriental Avenue. She provided detailed background of the research performed and a review of the written public comments received.
As public comment, Margaret Paul suggested the Council reflect on the cultural heritage of area. Melissa Fisher, of Escape Craft Brewery and who is half Chinese, stated she does not find the street name offensive, and she recommended Council not erase history, but strive to understand the past. Robb McDermott had collected over 10,000 electronic signatures for his petition to rename the street to Al Harris Avenue, the Kirkorian employee beloved by many, and he briefly described his plan to establish educational monuments that would honor the history of the area. Andy Hoder was not in support of renaming Oriental Avenue but did ask Council to consider changing Shopper's Lane to Al Harris Avenue.
A lengthy Council Member discussion followed. Topics discussed included whether staff should continue to do more community outreach. Council Members Davis and Guzman-Lowery were uncomfortable making a decision tonight and wanted more time to better determine what other cities have done. Council Member Davis wondered if the City could pay for costs incurred by the two businesses that would be directly affected if the street were to undergo a name change. City Manager Duggan clarified this could be accomplished if the Council determined the finding was in the publics' interest and served all the people.
On motion by Council Member Guzman-Lowery, seconded by Council Member Davis, the CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
600 of 602
City Council failed to table the matter for future Council consideration, due to lack of a majority. Mayor Barich, Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda and Council Member Foster voted NO. The motion failed.
On motion of Council Member Paul Foster, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Eddie Tejeda, the City Council approved to retain the street name of Oriental Avenue the same Vote: 3 - 2 Passed
NAY: Council Member Denise Davis
Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES
Mayor Barich attended the Redlands Police Department Welcome Aboard and Promotions Ceremony held earlier in the day and was proud to honor Dr. Donald Robinson, pastor of the Community Missionary Baptist Church in Redlands, for over 50 years of preaching the Gospel.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:25 P.M. in honor of Clara Mae Clem, philanthropist and life-long resident of Redlands. A teacher for forty years, she was passionate about education, always encouraging young people. She had numerous business and real estate interests and was a notable supporter of many charities including Family Service Association, the Salvation Army, and she was a major contributor to the University of Redlands and the Museum of Redlands (MOR). To establish the future home of MOR, she even purchased the old Redlands Daily Facts building at Brookside Avenue and Center Street. The next regular meeting of the City of Redlands City Council will be held on December 21, 2021.
SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS
Chairman Barich called the meeting to order and offered anyone present the opportunity to address the Board on any subject, not already on the agenda, within the jurisdiction of the Successor Agency.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None forthcoming
Minutes
On motion of Board Member Foster, seconded by Vice Chair Tejeda, the minutes of the regular meeting of November 2, 2021 were unanimously approved.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
ADJOURNMENT
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
601 of 602
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Successor Agency Board of Directors' meeting was adjourned at 10:26 P.M.
CC_SA_December 7, 2021
Redlands Regular Meeting of 02-01-22
602 of 602