Agenda packet — Redlands City Council, December 20, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

LIST OF WELLS FROM REPORT TABLE
# Name Discharge to Zone Capacity (GPM) Ground Elev. (FT) Water Surface Elev. (FT) 1 North Orange Street 1 1350 2900 3050 293
2 North Orange Street 2 1350 2900 3105 288
3 10 1570 1500 1650 80
4 13 1570 3000 3006 171
5 38 1570 1500 1634 520
6 39 1570 1250 1255 535
7 Church Street 1570 2000 2136 485
8 Orange Street 1570 1500 1165 459
9 Agate 2 1750 1500 1646 299
10 Airport 1 1750 1700 1316 498
11 Airport 2 1750 1100 119 545
12 Mentone Acres 2 1750 1900 1787 491
13 Rees 1750 1200 1964 544
14 Muni 1750 N/A N/A N/A
15 Madeira 1900 750 697 399
16 Lugonia 3 2100 250 500 N/A
17 Lugonia 4 - INACTIVE? 2100 1300 UNK UNK
18 Lugonia 6 2100 250 N/A N/A
19 Maguet 2 2100 300 249 253
20 Crafton 2100 1600 N/A N/A
The City of Redlands Facilities Data Information

THIS IS THE TABLE FOR THE CIP - WELL REHABILITATION
Index LIST OF WELLS THAT DANIEL SENT Zone? Capacity GPM Efficiency HP Rehab Budget Rehab Year 18 Well 10 1570 1400 0.27 75 $1,050,000 2022
12 Maguet 2 2100 400 0.35 25 $300,000 2022
17 Rees 1750 550 0.43 250 $412,500 2023
9 Lugonia 3 2100 250 0.43 25 $0 2023
10 Lugonia 6 2100 250 0.60 30 $187,500 2023
11 Madeira 1900 600 0.62 150 $450,000 2023
3 Crafton 2100 1700 0.65 200 $1,275,000 2024
7 Airport 2 1750 1000 0.68 300 $750,000 2025
6 Airport 1 1750 1500 0.70 350 $1,125,000 2025
13 Mentone Acres 2 1750 1600 0.71 300 $1,200,000 2026
5 Orange Street 1570 1500 0.74 300 $1,125,000 2027
1 North Orange Street 1 1350 2900 0.77 350 $2,175,000 2028 8 Church Street 1570 2000 0.77 400 $1,500,000 2029
21 Well 39 1570 1250 0.78 250 $937,500 2030
4 North Orange Street 2 1350 2900 0.78 350 $2,175,000 2031 20 Well 38 1570 1600 0.78 300 $1,200,000 2032
2 Agate 2 1750 1750 0.79 200 $1,312,500 2033
20 Lugonia 4 1300 UNK UNK $975,000 2034
16 Muni 1750 UNK UNK UNK $1,000,000 2035
19 Well 13 1570 UNK UNK UNK $1,000,000 2036
14 Mill Creek 2 - Surface Water UNK UNK UNK $1,000,000 2037 15 Mill Cereek 2A - Surface Water UNK UNK UNK $1,000,000 2038 W6-1 CALCUALTION SUMMARY TABLES
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 493 of 728
NP 1 Non-potable Water Improvements 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 5-year Total 2022-2026 2027-2031 2032-2036 2037-2041 20-year Total NP 1.1 Pipeline Replacement for Future System 756,000 $ 991,000 $ 1,177,000 $ 2,924,000 $ 2,924,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,924,000 $ NP 1.2 Groundwater Well Equipment Rehabilitation 637,500 $ 225,000 $ 375,000 $ 1,125,000 $ 1,125,000 $ 3,487,500 $ 3,487,500 $ 3,562,500 $ 2,962,500 $ 2,062,500 $ 12,075,000 $ NP 1.3 Meter replacement and calibration 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 220,000 $ NP 1.4 AMI (Automated Metering Infrastructure) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CIP NP 1 Subtotal Subtotal 1,404,500 $ 1,227,000 $ 1,563,000 $ 1,136,000 $ 1,136,000 $ 6,466,500 $ 6,466,500 $ 3,617,500 $ 3,017,500 $ 2,117,500 $ 15,219,000 $ NP 2 Recycled Water Improvements 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 5-year Total 2022-2026 2027-2031 2032-2036 2037-2041 20-year Total NP 2.1 Recycle Water Reservoirs - design two & build in phases 200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ CIP NP 2 Subtotal Subtotal 844,000 $ 1,809,000 $ 223,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,800,000 $ 7,276,000 $ 7,276,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 18,376,000 $ Optional Expansion 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 5-year Total 2022-2026 2027-2031 2032-2036 2037-2041 20-year Total Expansion of the Recycled/Non-pootable Water System 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 50,000,000 $ CIP Optional Expansion Subtotal Subtotal 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 50,000,000 $ Project2022-2026 2027-2031 2032-2036 2037-2041 20-year Total CIP Cost NP 1 - Non-potable Water Improvements 6,466,500 $ 3,617,500 $ 3,017,500 $ 2,117,500 $ 15,219,000 $ NP 2 - Recycled Water Improvements 7,276,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 18,376,000 $ NP 3 Optional Expansion 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 50,000,000 $ Total 13,742,500 $ 7,317,500 $ 6,717,500 $ 5,817,500 $ 33,595,000 $ Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 494 of 728
Name Discharge to Zone
Test # HP Head Capacity
Overall
Eff
Improved
Eff
Total KwH Kw Input
Cost per
Kwh
Average cost
per Acre Ft
1 California 1 1 100 462.80 519 52.00% 68.00% 215784 87 0.14 129.09 1 150 226.1 1429 57.00% 70.00% 536952 106.8 0.13 51.59
2 150 235.30 1558 52.80%
1 150 254.00 1566 60.90% 70.00% 118356 123 0.16 66.41
2 150 276.50 1463 61.40%
7 31A 2 1 450 258.60 878 31.90% 72.00% 475248 134 0.13 107.75 7 32 2 1 200 269.80 1854 60.50%
9 41 2 1 100 825 74940 73.7 0.25 122.5
6 11 detached systems 1 60 176.80 311 47.90% 65.00% 39804 21.6 0.17 64.12 1 125 125.20 2261
2 125 138.60 2176
3 125 149.30 2152
1 150 103.80 1202 50.50% 71.00% 99744 46.5 0.15 31.62
2 150 143.80 1879 55.90%
10 Agate 1 detached systems 1 200 307.10 1816 77.50% 177240 135.5 0.16 62.81 1 75 233.60 653 61.50% 5496 46.7 0.5 193.74
2 75 252.80 618 63.20%
3 75 272.50 578 64.20%
3 Crafton detached systems 1 200 254.60 1754 59.80% 70.00% 42830 120.11 0.37 161.68 11 Hog Canyon detached systems 1 100 282.70 950 66.40% 121 76.2 15.23 6641.61 These values do not make sense.

Name Capacity Status in 2019 Efficiency HP Rehab Budget CIP Year 31A 850 idle 31.9% 450 $637,500 2022
11 300 In Use 47.9% 60 $225,000 2023
California 500 In Use 52.0% 100 $375,000 2024
16 1500 In Use 53.2% 150 $1,125,000 2025
New York Street 1500 In Use 54.9% 150 $1,125,000 2026
41 800 In Use N/A 100 $600,000 2027
14 2200 In Use N/A 125 $1,650,000 2028/2029
Crafton 1750 idle 59.8% 200 $1,312,500 2030/2031
32 1850 In Use 60.5% 200 $1,387,500 2032/2033
30A 1500 In Use 61.2% 150 $1,125,000 2034/2035
Chicken Hill 600 In Use 63.0% 75 $450,000 2036
Hog Canyon 950 Idle 66.4% 100 $712,500 2037
Agate 1 1800 Idle 77.5% 200 $1,350,000 2038
$12,075,000
CIP NP 1-2 Groundwater Well Equipment Rehabilitation
4 New York Street 2
7 30A 2
2 Chicken Hill detached systems
Half of the data in this file is for pump 36
6 14 detached systems
6 16 detached systems
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 495 of 728
Size (in) Number of meters Cost per meter Total Cost Meter Cost Strainer Lid Install 3/4"" 8 350 $ 2,800 $ 229.14 45 79.36
1"" 22 420 $ 9,240 $ 294.9 45 79.36
1 1/2"" 27 1,000 $ 27,000 $ 503.55 100 396.77
2"" 117 1,140 $ 133,380 $ 646.5 100 396.77
4"" 4 3,050 $ 12,200 $ 2000 450 595.15
6"" 2 7,650 $ 15,300 $ 4900 770 1984
Unknown 4 2,500 $ 10,000 $ 1000 500 1000
Total 184 1.03
Meter Calibration
4"" 4 380 $ 1,520 $ 300 80
6"" 2 380 $ 760 $ 300 80
212,200
CIP NP 1-3 Meter Replacement
$
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 496 of 728
Age
Abv. Material Service Life Diameter (in) Error Check 1 1.5 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 14 15 16 18 20 24 UNK ACP Asbestos Concrete Pipe 70 Error (lower than -100) 31324.65896 31324.65896 170.0532008 0 7650.993724 5.960794973 129.7816831 0 1503.606909 2838.241313 1635.244562 0 4479.447815 7375.907811 0 0 0 5535.421146 CIP Cast Iron Pipe 120 Less than 0 Greater or equal to -100 9941.277878 9941.277878 0 0 0 0 38.47763056 0 0 0 0 0 0 528.9785146 678.2402007 8695.581532 0 0 CMLC Cement Mortar Lined and Coated 100 Less than or equal to 5 and greater than or equal to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CMLDIP Cement Mortar Lined Ductile Iron Pipe 100 Greater than 5 less than or equal to 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CMLSTL Cement Mortar Lined Steel Pipe 100 Greater than 10 less than or equal to 15 32.99984171 32.99984171 0 0 32.99984171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON Concrete 100 Greater than 15 less than or equal to 20 9145.788628 9145.788628 0 0 0 0 145.6934138 347.4828578 1153.894925 0 66.26587706 0 1074.792121 0 792.4039506 5564.24105 0 1.014433667 COP Copper 50 Greater than 20 less than or equal to 25 724.4704218 724.4704218 0 0 11.41977579 0 0 0 586.0381374 10.08172033 0 0 0 0 0 116.9307883 0 0 DIP Ductile Iron Pipe 100 Greater than 25 less than or equal to 30 13025.334 13025.334 0 0 115.1688049 0 1272.288579 2737.98753 702.37107 0 924.2124762 7273.305542 0 0 0 0 0 0 DW Dipped and Wrapped 40 Greater than 30 less than or equal to 35 1501.374678 1501.374678 0 0 1198.626349 0 0 10.27101633 292.4773135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HDPE High Density Polyethylene 50 Greater than 35 less than or equal to 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTH Other 40 Greater than 40 less than or equal to 45 5913.238597 5913.238597 0 0 0 0 2116.021845 0 328.2039271 0 0 0 0 3016.261109 310.5901137 142.1616023 0 0 PVC Polyvinyl Chloride 70 Greater than 45 less than or equal to 50 11713.52697 11713.52697 0 0 0 0 0 10926.02914 0 0 0 0 0 754.1529482 0 33.34487264 0 0 RCP Reincforced Concrete Pipe 100 Greater than 50 less than or equal to 55 66463.12701 66463.12701 0 0 6573.923512 0 127.1116537 22100.41276 5988.10909 1660.127735 12660.13005 0 470.0535481 3565.89249 0 609.0151693 12708.351 0 STL Steel 100 Greater than 55 less than or equal to 60 16751.61504 16751.61504 0 0 0 0 0 10603.10546 1178.507472 0 3415.056614 0 0 1554.945491 0 0 0 0 Unk Unknown 40 Greater than 60 less than or equal to 65 1893.355577 1893.355577 0 0 178.0873316 0 20.85264859 0 0 0 1694.415597 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VCP Vitrified Clay Pipe 50 Greater than 65 less than or equal to 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greater than 70 less than or equal to 75 972.2601155 972.2601155 0 0 0 0 0 39.99993194 0 0 932.2601835 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greater than 75 less than or equal to 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greater than 80 less than or equal to 90 13262.0683 13262.0683 0 0 413.138807 0 330.6263726 7587.508824 425.2161629 1357.952259 12.9633912 0 0 3125.475221 0 0 9.187265354 0 Greater than 90 less than or equal to 100 30975.44527 30975.44527 126.6871248 11.26999086 981.7236462 0 33.61925957 3826.239269 13558.25638 0 12437.6496 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Error (greater than 100) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 213640.5413 213640.5413 296.7403256 11.26999086 17156.08179 5.960794973 4214.473086 58179.03679 25716.68138 5866.403027 33778.19836 7273.305542 6024.293484 19921.61358 1781.234265 15161.27501 12717.53826 5536.43558 Cost ($/in-ft) Total (miles) 40.46222373 3052.007733

19.5 Age
Diameter (in) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 12 14 15 16 18 20 24 30
Error (lower than -100) 31324.65896 9,261,669.20 $ 26,528.30 $ - $ 1,193,555.02 $ 929.88 $ 20,245.94 $ - $ 234,562.68 $ 553,457.06 $ 382,647.23 $ - $ 1,310,238.49 $ 2,301,283.24 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,238,221.37 $ Less than 0 Greater or equal to -100 9941.277878 3,800,382.91 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,002.51 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,041.30 $ 238,062.31 $ 3,391,276.80 $ - $ - $ Less than or equal to 5 and greater than or equal to 0 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 5 less than or equal to 10 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 10 less than or equal to 15 32.99984171 5,147.98 $ - $ - $ 5,147.98 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 15 less than or equal to 20 9145.788628 3,035,607.26 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,728.17 $ 54,207.33 $ 180,007.61 $ - $ 15,506.22 $ - $ 314,376.70 $ - $ 278,133.79 $ 2,170,054.01 $ - $ 593.44 $ Greater than 20 less than or equal to 25 724.4704218 140,772.38 $ - $ - $ 1,781.49 $ - $ - $ - $ 91,421.95 $ 1,965.94 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,603.01 $ - $ - $ Greater than 25 less than or equal to 30 13025.334 2,955,017.43 $ - $ - $ 17,966.33 $ - $ 198,477.02 $ 427,126.05 $ 109,569.89 $ - $ 216,265.72 $ 1,985,612.41 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 30 less than or equal to 35 1501.374678 234,214.45 $ - $ - $ 186,985.71 $ - $ - $ 1,602.28 $ 45,626.46 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 35 less than or equal to 40 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 40 less than or equal to 45 5913.238597 1,486,832.84 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 330,099.41 $ - $ 51,199.81 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 941,073.47 $ 109,017.13 $ 55,443.02 $ - $ - $ Greater than 45 less than or equal to 50 11713.52697 1,952,760.77 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,704,460.55 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 235,295.72 $ - $ 13,004.50 $ - $ - $ Greater than 50 less than or equal to 55 66463.12701 16,148,439.54 $ - $ - $ 1,025,532.07 $ - $ 19,829.42 $ 3,447,664.39 $ 934,145.02 $ 323,724.91 $ 2,962,470.43 $ - $ 137,490.66 $ 1,112,558.46 $ - $ 237,515.92 $ 5,947,508.27 $ - $ Greater than 55 less than or equal to 60 16751.61504 3,122,197.86 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,654,084.45 $ 183,847.17 $ - $ 799,123.25 $ - $ - $ 485,142.99 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 60 less than or equal to 65 1893.355577 427,527.89 $ - $ - $ 27,781.62 $ - $ 3,253.01 $ - $ - $ - $ 396,493.25 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 65 less than or equal to 70 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 70 less than or equal to 75 972.2601155 224,388.87 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,239.99 $ - $ - $ 218,148.88 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 75 less than or equal to 80 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Greater than 80 less than or equal to 90 13262.0683 2,613,294.50 $ - $ - $ 64,449.65 $ - $ 51,577.71 $ 1,183,651.38 $ 66,333.72 $ 264,800.69 $ 3,033.43 $ - $ - $ 975,148.27 $ - $ - $ 4,299.64 $ - $ Greater than 90 less than or equal to 100 30975.44527 5,802,306.13 $ 19,763.19 $ 1,758.12 $ 153,148.89 $ - $ 5,244.60 $ 596,893.33 $ 2,115,087.99 $ - $ 2,910,410.01 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Error (greater than 100) 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Total 213640.5413 51,210,559.99 $ 46,291.49 $ 1,758.12 $ 2,676,348.76 $ 929.88 $ 657,457.80 $ 9,075,929.74 $ 4,011,802.30 $ 1,143,948.59 $ 7,904,098.42 $ 1,985,612.41 $ 1,762,105.84 $ 6,215,543.44 $ 625,213.23 $ 5,912,897.26 $ 5,951,807.91 $ 3,238,814.81 $ Material Average Service Life Length
Length
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 497 of 728

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 498 of 728
City of Redlands
2022 Water Systems Master Plan

APPENDIX D
Water System Inefficiency Cost Opinion
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 499 of 728

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 500 of 728
2020 2022 2025 2027 2030 2032 2035 2037 2040 2042 2045

18.90 19.10 19.40 19.72 20.20 20.48 20.90 21.14 21.50 21.78 22.20 2022* 2027 2032 2037 2042
Projected ADD 18.90 19.72 20.48 21.14 21.78
Projected MDD 32.13 33.52 34.82 35.94 37.03
Projected PHD 51.98 54.23 56.32 58.14 59.90
Expected Inefficiencies (%) 12.8 8 6 4 3
Projected ADD production 21.32 21.30 21.71 21.99 22.43
Delta inefficiencies 2.42 1.58 1.23 0.85 0.65
Delta inefficiencies (afy) 2,710 1,767 1,376 947 732
inEfficiencies Monetization
Delta inefficiencies Lost Billing Charges ($) 2,333,439 1,521,674 1,185,239 815,623 630,237 Delta inefficiencies Lost Purchase Charges ($), based on $500 $/(afy)well water price 1,354,752 883,456 688,128 473,536 365,904 Delta inefficiencies Power Use ($) 60% of Billing charges 1,400,063 913,004 711,143 489,374 378,142 Delta inefficiencies O&M ($) 30% of B illing charges 700,032 456,502 355,572 244,687 189,071 Delta inefficiencies New Capacity Planning ($) 30% of B illing charges 700,032 456,502 355,572 244,687 189,071 TOTAL Monatized Inefficienices 6,488,318 4,231,139 3,295,654 2,267,907 1,752,425 AVERAGE Monatized Inefficienices 3,607,089
Reduction in inefficiencies ($) - 2,257,179 3,192,664 4,220,411 4,735,893 AVERAGE Monatized Reduction in Inefficienices 2,881,229 $ Where
* 2020 Urban water management plan water supply data was used to approximate the 2022 base line level 1,000,000 gpd 1,120 afyr
City of Redlands 2021 Water use rate 1 mg
($)

1.46 100 cft 748 gal 1,952

1.78 748 2,380

2.69 748 3,596
Average 2,643
City of Redlands 2021 MP Data ADD PDD
(mgd) (mgd)
2022 18.9 32.13
2042 21.78 37.026
Interpulation
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 501 of 728
The City of Redlands
CIP implementation and Water Supply Inefficiencies reduction 2022 to 2042 2022* 2027 2032 2037 2042
Projected ADD 18.90 19.72 20.48 21.14 21.78
Projected MDD 32.13 33.52 34.82 35.94 37.03
Projected PHD 51.98 54.23 56.32 58.14 59.90
Expected Inefficiencies (%) 12.8 10 8 6 4
Projected ADD production 21.32 21.69 22.12 22.41 22.65
Delta inefficiencies 2.42 1.97 1.64 1.27 0.87
Delta inefficiencies (afy) 2,710 2,209 1,835 1,421 976
inEfficiencies Monetization
Delta inefficiencies Lost Billing Charges ($) 2,333,439 1,902,092 1,580,319 1,223,435 840,316 Delta inefficiencies Lost Purchase Charges ($), based on $500 $/(afy)well water price 1,354,752 1,104,320 917,504 710,304 487,872 Delta inefficiencies Power Use ($) 60% of Billing charges 1,400,063 1,141,255 948,191 734,061 504,190 Delta inefficiencies O&M ($) 30% of B illing charges 700,032 570,628 474,096 367,031 252,095 Delta inefficiencies New Capacity Planning ($) 30% of B illing charges 700,032 570,628 474,096 367,031 252,095 TOTAL Monatized Inefficienices 6,488,318 5,288,923 4,394,205 3,401,861 2,336,567 AVERAGE Monatized Inefficienices 4,381,975
Reduction in inefficiencies ($) - 1,199,395 2,094,113 3,086,457 4,151,751 AVERAGE Monatized Reduction in Inefficienices 2,106,343 $ Where
* 2020 urban water management plan water supply data was used to approximate the 2022 base line level 1,000,000 gpd 1,120 afyr
City of Redlands 2021 Water use rate 1 mg
($)

1.46 100 cft 748 gal 1,952

1.78 748 2,380

2.69 748 3,596
Average 2,643

ADD PDD
(mgd) (mgd)
2022 18.9 32.13
2042 22.17 37.689
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 502 of 728
City of Redlands
2022 Water Systems Master Plan

APPENDIX E
CIP Projects Remaining After Quality Control
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 503 of 728

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 504 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 505 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 506 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 507 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 508 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 509 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 510 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 511 of 728

MOID MATERIAL LENGTH DIAMETER
644 PVC 187.23 6
645 PVC 463.27 6
646 PVC 658.44 6
780 PVC 108.75 6
781 PVC 282.83 6
782 PVC 835.55 6
783 DIP 15.00 6
784 DIP 21.00 6
785 DIP 15.00 6
786 DIP 21.00 6
788 PVC 389.33 6
789 PVC 234.42 6

MOID MATERIAL LENGTH DIAMETER
268 PVC 20.91 6
269 PVC 273.46 6
758 PVC 144.27 6
759 PVC 39.67 6
760 PVC 1.52 6
761 PVC 4.00 6
762 PVC 95.47 6
763 PVC 5.00 6
768 PVC 478.41 6
770 PVC 75.26 6
834 PVC 22.59 6
839 PVC 43.17 6
840 PVC 178.15 6
841 PVC 10.00 6
848 PVC 113.93 6
849 PVC 393.77 6
1850 <Null> 617.72 8
1851 <Null> 532.52 8
1859 <Null> 102.09 8
1860 <Null> 216.25 8

MOID MATERIAL LENGTH DIAMETER
104 PVC 5.00 12
112 PVC 171.06 10
114 PVC 4.99 10
399 PVC 436.19 12
400 PVC 389.27 12
701 ACP 115.23 20
CIP_1
CIP_2
CIP_3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 512 of 728
707 STL 93.05 12
708 STL 5.00 12
709 UNK 5.08 10
710 STL 4.29 12
712 STL 5.64 12
715 STL 11.10 12
716 STL 16.00 12
717 STL 781.62 12
720 STL 12.37 12
721 STL 2.97 12
723 STL 4.00 6
724 STL 11.00 6
725 STL 5.50 6
726 STL 5.50 6
727 STL 7.00 8
728 STL 6.44 8
729 STL 6.50 8
730 STL 8.96 8
731 STL 8.96 8
732 STL 6.00 8
733 PVC 8.20 8
734 STL 6.00 8
735 STL 16.14 8
736 STL 16.14 8
737 PVC 19.66 10
739 PVC 2.97 8
740 PVC 8.58 10

MOID MATERIAL LENGTH DIAMETER
85 UNK 526.61 20
86 UNK 503.30 20
408 DW 57.98 16
409 DW 129.07 16
410 DW 328.39 16
411 DW 13.54 16
412 DW 364.37 20
531 ACP 128.41 20
534 CMLC 60.28 16
535 CMLC 4.96 16
CIP_4
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 513 of 728

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 514 of 728
City of Redlands
2022 Water Systems Master Plan

APPENDIX F
Condition, Seismic, and Structural Assessment Executive Summary
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 515 of 728

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 516 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 517 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
1 FINAL
Executive Summary
From: Richard Brady, P.E., BCEE, CEO, Richard Brady & Associates, Inc.

Project Manager
To: Veronica Medina, EIT, Project Manager
Paul Mariscal, Water Production Operations Superintendent Date: June 30, 2022
Subject: Condition Assessment Summary and Recommended Action Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Scope of Work
BRADY’s Scope of Work was to provide professional engineering services to perform condition, seismic, and structural assessments for the City of Redlands water facilities infrastructure. The infrastructure evaluated included 18 reservoirs, 9 pump stations, and two pipelines.

Recommended Capital Improvement Projects
In summation, in order of priority, the recommended capital improvement projects that require the City’s action to improve water security in a future seismic event are as follows:

1. New Sunset Reservoir(s). The Sunset
Reservoir dates to 1967. It is in extremely poor
condition with no seismic restraint and has a
lead paint coated interior. The soil below the
reservoir is fractured granite and potentially
unstable. A new reservoir in this location
would require the top ten feet of soil to be
removed. Large Verizon cell towers have
been installed adjacent to the reservoir. In a
major seismic event, the Sunset Reservoir is in
danger of either tipping over into the
canyon below, or in the other direction,
into the cell towers that would affect cell
phone communications for the region,
causing critical problems if the towers were
damaged. The recommendation is broken
into two separate phases.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 518 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
2 Given the lack of seismic anchorage and likely overturning in a major seismic event, the first phase is to erect a temporary 750,000-gallon bolted steel tank on the parcel north of existing reservoir. The City can purchase this temporary tank, which can be disassembled, stored, and re-used in the future where needed in the system, possibly as a reclaimed water tank in the Crafton Hills college area. This action is necessary because the Sunset Reservoir has no back-up reservoir to service the 2340 service Zone in this area. The Sand Canyon Reservoir also services the 2340 Zone, but it not hydraulically connected to the Sunset service area; they operate independently of one another.

We have studied an option to construct a new partially buried prestressed concrete reservoir in an adjacent parcel that the City may purchase assuming a successful negotiation is concluded. If the land purchase is not successful, then the recommendation is to construct a new 3 MG prestressed concrete reservoir on the existing tank site.

If the negotiation is successful, the second phase is to construct a new partially buried 10 MG prestressed concrete reservoir in the City’s parcel adjacent to the existing Sunset site.

The property has 4 separate but adjoining parcels, 22 acres in total. The new reservoir can comfortably be constructed in this 22-acre parcel, with room for a possible second 10 million gallon (MG) reservoir at some future date. These are the largest reservoirs that can be constructed at this site at the right hydraulic elevation. The existing Sunset Reservoir is only 3 MG but the additional 7 MG at this location will account for the 6 MG of lost storage in the City due to reduced high-water levels (HWL) to meet current seismic codes. The other major benefit will be to significantly improve the City’s water reliability and resiliency by having a large water volume that can serve the City by gravity in the instance that power is lost in a seismic event. The additional 6 MG of storage is a placeholder for more
storage that will be lost if
a reservoir consolidation
plan is accepted by the
City and other
stakeholders (Municipal
Utilities/Public Works
Commission). Sunset
Reservoir is one of the
City’s most valuable
assets as it sits at the
highest elevation in the
City, allowing gravity
flow to 97% of the City’s
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 519 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
3 population. The recommended size is 10 MG. A proposed layout is illustrated in the image to the right. The layout shows a potential second reservoir, if needed, to meet water demands at some future date. These two reservoirs are illustrated in blue; the temporary 750,00-gallon tank is illustrated in red.

The proposed layout would be similar to a
1994 BRADY design for two new 21 MG
prestressed concrete reservoirs at the
Alvarado Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in
the City of San Diego. The adjacent photo of
the completed project will help visualize
what this could look like. The reservoir on
the right includes a Native Plant
Demonstration Garden on the reservoir for
public education purposes of native,
drought tolerant landscaping. Similar joint
public use can be considered for the new Sunset Reservoir site, which provides an impressive 360-degree view of the area.

2. (a) Second Mill Creek Pipeline. The poor
condition of this pipe presents a significant
concern about the extended operating life of
this asset. The pipe is elevated above Mill Creek
on concrete piers spaced approximately 40 feet
apart. Numerous large boulders span the length
and width of Mill Creek. The chance of failure
of this pipe during a major seismic event is
significant, as well as during a major storm
event where large boulders could damage the
piers. Historical boulder impacts to the existing support piers are visually evident. To improve overall reliability of this critical asset, several pipe replacement alternatives will be considered. A second pipeline is only one of these
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 520 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
4 alternatives. The Mill Creek Pipeline delivers raw water for treatment at Tate WTP. This pipeline is critically important to the City’s water security because the Tate WTP can serve more than 85% of the City’s entire population by gravity flow. Maintaining continuous operations of the Tate WTP is therefore essential in a future major seismic event. A possible solution is to construct a second 30-inch diameter inlet pipeline parallel to the existing pipeline under Mill Creek. The pipe should parallel the existing pipe in Mill Creek Road all the way to the inlet structure at the Tate WTP. A dedicated inlet structure should be constructed to receive this new pipeline, and then connect to the existing inlet box for distribution to the reactor clarifiers. The new pipeline should also have a dedicated flow meter located at the plant site. A concept sketch is included below. The City has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the design of this pipeline.

Proposals are due February 29, 2022. The consultant
selected to predesign and design this pipeline will also be tasked with developing a project budget. Therefore, our cost table below will not include a price for the new pipeline given this cost will be developed by others at some future date.

Additionally, once the new pipeline is in operation, the existing piers should be reinforced as necessary to provide additional security against catastrophic failure. Flexible expansion joints should be provided on each side of the creek where the pipe comes out of and re-enters the ground.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 521 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
5 Once the new pipeline is constructed below Mill Creek, and the existing pipeline is rehabilitated with improvements to protect the support piers, the Tate WTP will have two independent pipelines delivering raw water to the plant. This is the ideal outcome for a water treatment facility as important as Tate – two separate ways to keep the plant in service during a major seismic event.
(b) Mill Creek 1 and 2 Tanks. The Mill Creek 1 and 2 tanks were erected in 2005 at 200,000 gallons each. The tanks are redundant to each other, so a minimum of 200,000 gallons of storage is needed at all times to provide the desired benefit – supplemental backwash supply to the Tate WTP.

Structural calculations to bring Mill Creek 1 and 2 into code compliance would require a significant reduction in operating volumes. Each tank would see a reduction from the design volume of 200,000 gallons to 90,420 gallons, to 45% of the original volume. The Mill Creek 1 and 2 tanks were not provided with seismic anchorage, are in danger of overturning in a seismic event, and lack sufficient freeboard to protect the tanks from damage due to sloshing.

Though it is not a proven industry solution, serious consideration should be given to raising the reservoir roofs as needed to restore the operating volumes of each tank to 200,00 gallons. Seismic anchorage is also required. Using cost figures we recently developed for California American Water, a rehabilitation budget cost of $2.50 per gallon is the approximate cost per tank. Therefore, a budget figure of $500,000 is recommended per tank, $1M total, to resolve this problem as quickly as possible.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 522 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
6 3. Optimize Agate Reservoir and Construct New 60-inch Pipeline. The Agate Reservoir dates to 1968 and serves as the clearwell reservoir for the Hinckley WTP. The reservoir does not meet current seismic design codes, but can
be brought into compliance by reducing the
operating capacity to 2,163,000 gallons, which will
decrease stresses in the steel shell and increase the
freeboard to allow for sloshing.

However, the operating volume of the
Agate Reservoir is critically important as
the City achieves regulatory CT
compliance (disinfectant concentration
x time) inside of Agate Reservoir. The
reservoir was retro-fitted in 2010.

10.0 MG. The possibility of this occurring will result in losing the Hinckley WTP supply as all of the plant effluent flows through Agate Reservoir. Hinckley provides gravity flow to 40% of the City’s population.

Hypalon curtains shown anchored to the
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 523 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
7 A new 60-inch
diameter pipe parallel
to the existing 30-inch
plant effluent pipeline
will allow the City to
achieve CT compliance
in piping, not a baffled
circular reservoir
where the flow
circulation pattern is
not ideal. Together
with the existing 30-
inch pipeline, CT can
be achieved in pipe,
with no future reliance
on the hypalon curtains hanging from the reservoir roof. Once the new pipe is installed, the hypalon curtains can be removed to protect the reservoir and the system so the existing Agate Reservoir can remain in service at a reduced operating level. The 60-inch pipe will also provide a supplemental storage volume of 0.22 MG.

4. Highland Reservoir Seismic Upgrade. The 10 MG rectangular concrete reservoir is in fair condition, but does require immediate action to correct a minor seismic deficiency. The Highland design has some unique structural
features due to the presence of recreational
activities on the reservoir roof. As a result
of anticipating the associated live loads
from these activities, the structure generally
meets current seismic design codes. The
problem to be solved relates to the roof
diaphragm. The presence of slip dowels in the
existing roof design (designed to allow for
thermal expansion/contraction) do not transfer
seismic loads from the roof diaphragm to the
perimeter walls. In a (horizontal) seismic event,
the roof slab could collapse. A structural beam
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 524 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
8 (reinforced with 16- #10 bars) around the entire perimeter will contain and transfer diaphragm loads to walls per the detail shown at the right.

5. New 5th Ave Reservoir and Pump Station. The 5 MG Fifth Avenue Reservoir is the only City reservoir that is near an active fault. This reservoir is a key reservoir for the Tate WTP as water transfers into the lower elevations. Water stored in Fifth Avenue is also pumped to the 2340 Zone (Sand Canyon
Reservoir). The loss of Fifth Avenue for any
reason would restrict operations. The site
of the Fifth Avenue reservoir and pump
station is located within a County Fault Zone
for the Reservoir Canyon fault, which was
adopted in the Countywide Policy Map in
October 2020. As shown in the figures at
the left and below, the edge of the County
Fault Zone passes through the middle of the Fifth Avenue property. The Reservoir Canyon Fault is a normal fault that is part
of the Crafton Hills Fault Zone. The fault
trace is mapped about 400 feet away from
the closest location to the Fifth Avenue
reservoir.

The purple shaded zone on the County of
San Bernardino fault map is a County Fault
Zone – which is a zone of required investigation defined by the County of San Bernardino around the surface trace of an active fault that poses a risk of surface fault rupture in the future. Based on the Alquist-Priolo
Act, fault zones are generally defined
about 500 feet away from either side
of a known fault (approximately
1,000 ft in width total) to account for
the possibility that faults are not
precisely identified and may occur in
more than one branch in that area.

The width of a fault zone can vary, for
example, where faults are very welldefined at the surface, have narrow zones of deformation, and have vertical to sub-vertical inclinations, the zone can be narrower. Where faults are not well defined, contain wide zones of deformation, are segmented, or inclined at shallow angles, the fault zone may be wider to reflect this uncertainty. For the Reservoir Canyon Fault, the County Fault Zone appears to be about Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 525 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
9 1,200 feet in width (about 600 feet on either side of the inferred fault trace). The 400- foot distance described in the report is the distance between the Fifth Avenue Reservoir and the edge of the mapped fault zone, not the width of the fault zone itself.

The intent of earthquake fault zones is primarily to prevent the “location of developments and structures for human occupancy across the trace of active faults.” This is primarily to eliminate the risk of surface fault rupture damage to the structure. This does not mean no development can occur in a fault zone. Instead, it means that a site-specific fault investigation must be performed to determine if an active fault crosses the site, locate it with as much precision as possible, and recommend appropriate structural setbacks from the active fault trace. The intent of the proposed exploratory fault trench is to investigate the undeveloped portion of the site that is within the County Fault Zone of required investigation. This investigation would be used to determine whether a fault is present at the site that may impact siting of a future reservoir.

Construction of a new tank at the site may be governed by the City of Redlands Development Code. However, for surface fault rupture hazards, the lead agency may be either the City of Redlands, or the County of San Bernardino, depending on who is generally tasked with reviewing site-specific fault investigations. Depending on the agency, local jurisdictions may defer to the County or State for these reviews.” Therefore, there may be potential for surface rupture, or associated off-fault deformations at the site from movement of the Reservoir Canyon fault reaching the ground surface at the Fifth Avenue site. The County of San Bernardino Development Code, Chapter 82.15.040 (b) requires that construction of any new structure used for critical facilities (such as a reservoir) be located 150 feet or farther from any active earthquake fault trace. As required by codes, new structures or improvements at the Fifth Avenue site will require a site-specific surface fault rupture investigation. We recommend excavating the fault trench location shown on the figure to the right as a part of any future reservoir improvement plan. The trench excavation will be approximately 3 feet wide and up to 10 feet deep.

Fortunately, the existing reservoir walls are completely buried with a column supported exposed concrete roof. Major structure damage that may occur in an earthquake will not result in a tidal wave of water causing damage to other structures. However, the loss of Fifth Avenue will cause an operational challenge for City staff. Replacing this reservoir with a prestressed concrete reservoir designed to AWWA D110, Type 1 (cast in place concrete walls) provides the City with the best protection in a future seismic event.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 526 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
10 A Brief Clarification of Risk at the Fifth Avenue Reservoir Site It should be noted that throughout the City’s system, compliance with current seismic codes is clearly the goal, however, compliance with current code does not guarantee that a reservoir constructed before 1994 (Northridge earthquake, the last regional earthquake of significance) would not be seriously damaged in an earthquake. For example, most of the City’s 12 steel tanks can be made code compliant by simply lowering the operating levels. Various recommendations to bring structures “up to code” only addresses the hazard of strong ground shaking. In no way does it mitigate the hazard of surface fault rupture.

As noted above, the 5th Ave reservoir is mapped in very close proximity to Reservoir Canyon Fault. If that fault were to rupture, there would potentially be feet of displacement that could occur both horizontally and vertically. The existing reservoir could not withstand that level of movement and would be severely damaged. If you want to strengthen the existing reservoir for both ground shaking and surface fault rupture, a much more intensive structural strengthening would be required. Even without design drawings to review, our structural team believes you would have to replace the foundation with a rigid mat foundation and also consider strengthening the walls. There may also be other options to consider, like placement of geofoam or some sort of compressible foam behind the walls to reduce pressures and allow some movement without damage to the walls.

The City should assume the currently mapped fault location unless an exploratory excavation proves otherwise.

In light of these facts, we recommend
that the best path forward is to
abandon the existing structure and
replace it with a 5 MG prestressed
concrete reservoir designed to
withstand the likelihood of significant
ground movement in this location. A
new Fifth Avenue Pump Station,
adjacent to the new reservoir at grade,
should be designed to lift water from
the Fifth Avenue Reservoir directly up to Sunset Reservoir. A proposed location of the new reservoir and is shown in the figure above.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 527 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
11 It should be noted that any modifications to any of the reservoirs will trigger the requirement to bring the reservoir up to all codes per the California Water Resources Control Board Department of Drinking Water. The plans would need to be submitted to the Water Board for approval and permitting.

6. Improve Margarita or replace storage
elsewhere. The 2.4 MG rectangular concrete
reservoir is in poor condition and requires
immediate attention to correct structural and
seismic deficiencies. The roof and walls do not
meet current seismic codes. The roof will likely
collapse in a major seismic event. The only
practical upgrade solution is to construct a “tank
within a tank” by first removing the roof and
then constructing new walls, footing, and floor.

In this solution, the wall height can be increased
to provide more storage in this footprint if
desired. The new roof can either be concrete or an aluminum dome. Alternatively, pending the results of the reservoir consolidation study, it is highly likely we can eliminate this reservoir by constructing more storage at a higher hydraulic gradient (Sunset). The reservoir could then be demolished and the property sold for residential use. It is recommended that any action regarding Margarita be postponed until the consolidation study is complete and accepted by the City and other stakeholders.

7. Lower operating levels in steel tanks and replace lost storage elsewhere. The City has 12 steel tanks distributed throughout the system. To better understand the seismic resilience of these steel tanks, a series of calculations was performed based on AWWA D100-11 standards to check for three primary failure mechanisms within the steel tank structure: (1) adequate freeboard and sloshing, (2) seismic overturning, and (3) allowable stress development in the shell. Although all of the tanks satisfied static standards, they failed when subjected to design level earthquake standards.

The tanks without seismic anchorage along their perimeters usually failed in both seismic overturning and stress development in the shell. Additionally, the tank shells were not constructed with sufficient freeboard to contain the calculated sloshing. Retrofitting is not required if the HWL is lowered to the recommended values. The 12 steel tanks collectively provide 20.4 MG of storage volume in their current operating mode. Lowering the elevations as recommended will result in the loss of more than 6 MG of storage. This supports the idea of consolidation, as this storage can be replaced in properly designed prestressed concrete tanks – the best seismic designed tank in the industry today – at the highest elevation possible, which makes the Sunset site the ideal location. The majority Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 528 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
12 of the City’s steel tanks are also very old; Texas Street dates to 1956 and only three have been erected since 1973, which makes all of the steel tanks close to 50 years old or older.

The industry standard for the useful operating life of steel tanks is 50 years, so we recommend that no further investments be made in this infrastructure.

The City’s recently updated hydraulic model was utilized to study the consequences of lowering the maximum high water elevations in the City’s steel tanks. The primary concern is potential impacts on meeting pressure and fire code requirements. Each pressure zone was analyzed. The modeling efforts revealed deficiencies in individual tanks, but the deficiencies were offset by excess storage in other reservoirs serving the same pressure zone. For example, the Smiley Heights reservoir shows a deficiency of 3.05 million gallons, but fortunately this reservoir is in the same pressure zone with the Dearborn and Highland Reservoirs, the City’s largest reservoirs at 10.6 MG and 10 MG, respectively. Sunset Reservoir also show a deficiency of 1.04 million gallons, but this deficiency will be resolved when the new Sunset Reservoir is constructed. The only two tanks needing immediate attention is Mill Creek 1 and 2. Proposed upgrades were described above as project 2(b).

8. Replace Texas St. Reservoir in the existing
footprint or abandon and replace storage
elsewhere. The reservoir is in poor condition.

The reservoir could possibly be replaced in the
existing reservoir footprint at a size no less
than 1 MG and as large as 2.4 MG to make up
for the storage deficiency at Texas Grove, due
to the need to operate at a lower height to
meet seismic codes. In the short term to meet
current seismic codes, the reservoir high water
elevation needs to be reduced by 38% (13.4
feet), resulting in a revised operating volume of 619,000 gallons. This is a significant loss of storage. Lowering the operating depth is necessary to increase freeboard for sloshing and to decrease the extreme steel shell stress under seismic conditions. It is therefore recommended that the reservoir not be operated at full capacity. The possibility for overturning, sliding, and water loss being released are high in a seismic event, if operated at full capacity. Given the size and age of this tank, retroactively equipping the tank with seismic anchorage is not recommended. Replacement or abandonment is recommended.

The final decision about Texas Street should be postponed until the reservoir consolidation study is complete and accepted by the City and other stakeholders. If the reservoir is eventually abandoned, the pump station would need to be relocated to the Texas Grove Reservoir site.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 529 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
13 9. Maintain Dearborn and Country Club
reservoirs. The City’s concrete reservoirs
are in much better condition than the steel
tanks. The 10 MG Dearborn Reservoir
(photo at right), a rectangular concrete
design, is in fair condition and requires no
immediate attention or action to correct
any structural or seismic deficiencies,
especially since the completion of
structural and seismic improvements in
2014. At that time, the original seventyseven (77) columns were structurally enhanced and a new interior footing was
placed around the entire reservoir interior, which protects the roof from collapse (unlike Highland Reservoir).

The other concrete reservoirs that appear to
be code compliant without modifications in
operating elevations are Country Club 1 and

2. Country Club 1 Reservoir is 20 feet high,
with a diameter of 102.42 feet. The reservoir
is buried with an exposed roof. The
reservoir was built as a conventionally
reinforced concrete tank in 1924 and is the
City’s oldest reservoir. An aluminum roof
was added in 1980 and the tank was lined with steel plates in 2010, so technically the reservoir can now be considered a steel tank. The new steel tank rests within the old concrete structure and, overall, is in fairly good condition. However, the steel wall and old concrete wall are not structurally connected. It appears that the steel tank improvement was implemented strictly to resolve a leakage problem with the old concrete reservoir and is effectively a liner. The roof was also replaced for the second time. Due to the improvements in the reservoir that have been implemented in the past 40 years, and because the reservoir walls are completely below ground, the reservoir is in fair condition and does not require immediate attention or action. The reservoir passes all seismic requirements outlined by AWWA D100-11. Country Club 2 Reservoir dates back to 1969; it is in fair condition and does not require any maintenance at this time. Given the age and size of this reservoir, no further investment should be made at this site.

Both Country Club 1 and 2 should be maintained in service to provide additional water security to the City. The reservoirs are very high in the City’s hydraulic profile and pump water up to the Sunset Reservoir area. Beyond the water treatment plants, Sunset will become the City’s most valuable water asset; having at least two ways to get water up Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 530 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
14 the “hill” is critical. Improvements to the Country Club pump station should be made as a necessary improvement to assure the reliability of this facility. A new permanent emergency generator is in the City’s current plans, so no further action is needed at the County Club site. Overall, the City’s concrete reservoirs have done the job they were designed to do and have long useful lives ahead.

10. Pump Stations. The pump
stations located at the Texas
Street, Ward Way,
Dearborn, South, Sand
Canyon, Highland, 5th
Avenue, Smiley Heights and
Country Club reservoirs
were evaluated by a team of
experts in the mechanical,
electrical, civil and structural
engineering disciplines.

Visual and prominent
operational conditions were
observed, and additional
structural assessments (with
supporting calculations) were provided when warranted. Consideration was given to each structure with respect to fire hardening, and the presence of hazardous materials onsite was investigated and documented in the August 2021 Limited Asbestos and Lead Survey prepared by Group Delta Consultants, Inc. The only pump station needing immediate attention is at Ward Way,
where new pumps have
been recently installed, but
the building above the
pumps needs to be
replaced. The photo below
is from a recent pump
station project that BRADY
designed for the City of
Fountain Valley. The
proposed pump station
building at the Ward Way
site should look something
like the structure shown in
the photo. This pump
station house four vertical turbine pumps and a 500 KW diesel generator.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 531 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
15 Project Costs
Opinions of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) are summarized in Table 1 on the following page.

The detailed estimating backup for each capital project is included in a separate technical memorandum but is summarized in this Executive Summary. OPCC’s are summarized in the following separate categories:

1. Base cost of the capital project based on historical cost information for similar projects, supplemented where necessary with RS Means historical cost information.

2. Variable costs such as contractor general conditions costs (10%), and overhead and profit costs (15%), as a percentage of the OPCC.

3. Engineering and administrative cost as a percentage of the OPCC (soft costs).

4. Class 5 estimating contingency (+30%).

Recommended Capital Improvement Projects
Name Recommended
Improvement
Construction
Cost (1)
Soft Costs (2)
25%
Recommended
Project Budget
Comments
Sunset
Reservoir
New 15 MG Reservoir $21,761,910 $5,440,477 $27,202,387 AWWA D110, Type 1 design
Mill Creek
Pipeline
Construct a new 30-
inch parallel pipeline
under Mill Creek
Cost of be developed by the consultant selected by the
City to prepare the predesign and design documents for
this project
RFP has been issued for
predesign and design,
cost TBD
Mill Creek
Steel Tanks
Raise reservoir walls
to restore volume to
original design
$1,000,000 Will require a detailed
structural evaluation
and pricing before
moving forward
Agate
Reservoir
Construct a new 60-
inch pipeline to
achieve CT in a pipe;
remove hypalon
curtains
$3,726,854 $931,714 $4,658,568 Parallel existing 30-inch from Hinckley to Agate
site, retain existing
reservoir at reduced
operating level
Highland
Reservoir
Construct grade
beam around
reservoir exterior
perimeter
$1,257,067 $314,267 $1,571,333
Fifth Avenue
Reservoir
New 5 MG Reservoir
(min.)
$9,484,401 $2,371,100 $11,855,502 AWWA D110, Type 1
design
Fifth Avenue
Pump Station
New pump station to
lift water to Sunset
$9,867,988 $2,466,997 $12,334,986 Above ground, 4
vertical turbine pumps,
emergency generator
Texas Street Replace with 1.5 MG
or abandon
Decision on Texas Street should be deferred until a future reservoir consolidation study is complete
AWWA D110, Type 1
design
Ward Way
Pump Station
Erect new building
over existing pumps
$3,106,952 $776,738 $3,883,690 Masonry block building,
concrete roof
Note 1 Cost includes no project contingency but +30% for budgeting purposes Note 2 Soft costs include non-City project management, design, and construction phase services at 25% Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 532 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
16 Respectfully submitted,
Richard Brady, P.E., BCEE
CEO, Richard Brady & Associates
Project Manager and Engineer of Record
Additional background information is included in the following sections.

Section 1 – Historical Background of the City’s Water Assets Section 2 – Seismic Background
Section 3 – Recommended Capital Improvement Program
Section 4 – Pump Station Assessments
Section 5 – Prestressed Concrete Reservoir Design
Appendix A – City Response to the Draft Executive Summary dated February 27, 2022 Appendix B – BRADY Response to City’s Draft Executive Summary Comments dated May 3, 2022 Appendix C – Steel Tank Capacity Analysis
Appendix D – Summary Table
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 533 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
17 SECTION 1 – HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE CITY’S WATER ASSETS The City’s water assets evaluated in BRADY’s work are summarized in the table below and figures are provided on the following pages.

Name Type Year Size
Country Club 1 Concrete 1924 1
Country Club 2 Concrete 1969 2
Dearborn Concrete 1972 10.6
Fifth Avenue Concrete 1974 5
Highland Concrete 1976 10
Margarita Concrete 1964 2.4
Agate Reservoir Steel 1968 3
Arroyo Reservoir Steel 1965 0.5
Crafton Hills Steel 1970 1
Mill Creek 1 Steel 2005 0.2
Mill Creek 2 Steel 2005 0.2
Sand Canyon Steel 1973 3.5
Smiley Steel 1964 3
South Steel 1964 2
Sunset Steel 1967 3
Texas Grove Steel 2004 4
Texas Street Steel 1956 1
Ward Way Steel 1958 2
Hinckley Pipeline ML&CSP* 1987 36 inches
Mill Creek Pipeline Steel 1968 30 inches
Dearborn Pump Station 2000 gpm
Fifth Avenue Pump Station 3000 gpm
Highland Pump Station 4500 gpm
Sand Canyon Pump Station 1500 gpm
South Pump Station 4000 gpm
Texas Grove Pump Station 5800 gpm
Ward Way Pump Station 150 gpm
* Mortar lined and coated steel pipe
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 534 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
18 Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 535 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
19 Brief Assessment Summary
As both the table and graph below illustrate, the City’s reservoirs range in age from 1924 to 2005.

The majority of the City’s reservoirs were constructed before the 1971 San Fernando earthquake.

Therefore, it is not a surprise that only a few of the City’s 18 reservoirs meet current seismic codes. However, the City is very fortunate that only one reservoir – the 5 million gallon (MG) Fifth Avenue Reservoir -- is in close proximity to an active fault that requires special care and attention, as discussed in detail herein.

Existing Hydraulic Profile
The hydraulic profile of the City’s entire treatment, pumping, storage, and distribution system is graphically illustrated on the Hydraulic Profile image below. This figure was obtained from the City’s last Water Facilities Master Plan (Master Plan) from 2011, a report that was not finalized.

At the moment, the City has contracted with Michael Baker International to update the Master Plan. As of finalizing our efforts under our contract, the Master Plan has not yet been accepted by the City. The Master Plan should include an updated Hydraulic Profile as well as recommendations regarding the amount of storage the City should have for current needs and for at least 10 years into the future. We may revise some of our recommendations once we have an opportunity to review the recommendations of the Master Plan.

In our efforts, we spent considerable time trying to understand the hydraulic profile. As noted in the Title Block, this is truly a “Water System Connectivity Diagram” where all of the City’s water assets can be review in one image. The City’s system is very well interconnected with numerous ways to move water around the City in the event of disruption in service due to a major seismic event. As we studied the Hydraulic Profile and asked questions of City Operations Staff over the past year, a few discrepancies were discovered that are now reflected in our updated diagram (February 24, 2022) shown in the image below, and described herein:

1. The Sand Canyon and Sunset Reservoir both serve the highest zone in the City (2340), but are not hydraulically interconnected. Both tanks are steel with no second tank as backup.

This the reason why a temporary tank is needed at the Sunset site, to allow the existing tank to be taken off-line while a new permanent reservoir is constructed on the adjacent property.

2. The Mill Creek steel tanks are not connected to Sunset as well. These are small steel tanks that are primarily used as a supplemental filter backwash source at the Tate WTP.

3. The majority of City storage is consolidated in the 1750 and 1570 pressure zones, serving 40 percent of the City’s population by gravity. The City’s largest reservoirs are Dearborn (10.6 MG) and Highland (10 MG), that sit at the bottom of the hydraulic profile.

4. The City has 18 reservoirs spread throughout the distribution system. Compared to other similarly size cities (population 75,000), 18 reservoirs are on the high end, with many older small steel tanks. The opportunity for consolidation of storage is promising, by aggregating more storage at the Sunset and Fifth Avenue sites.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 536 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
20 Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 537 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
21 Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 538 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
22 Section 2 – Seismic Background
The Inconvenient Truth – Significant Seismic Risk in Redlands is Real The City of Redlands is located in an area
with very high seismic activity. Two of
California’s most highly active fault zones,
the internationally known San Andreas
Fault Zone and the San Jacinto Fault Zone,
flank the City of Redlands. These two fault
zones consist of multiple fault segments
and branches that have the potential for
larger earthquakes when they rupture in
combination. A regional fault map is shown in the figure below, followed by additional information concerning these faults.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 539 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
23 San Andreas Fault
The San Andreas Fault Zone is a right-lateral strike
slip fault system that extends a total length of 315
miles through California. This fault system forms the
boundary between the Pacific Plate and the North
American Plate. The Southern San Andreas section of
the fault system extends from Parkfield down to its
termination at the Salton Sea. The Southern San
Andreas section is estimated to be capable of
producing earthquakes with a maximum magnitude
(MW) of 8.2. In the area of Redlands and Yucaipa, the
structure of the San Andreas fault becomes very
complex where it has interacted with other faults
over the millennia, resulting in fractured segments
and discontinuous branches. Recurrence intervals
between ground-rupturing earthquakes vary on the
San Andreas fault system depending on location. Near Redlands this interval is estimated to be 175 to 200 years (USGS, 2017).

San Jacinto Fault
The San Jacinto Fault Zone is a right-lateral strike slip fault with a total length of about 125 miles, extending from San Bernardino down to Superstition Mountain. At the northern end of the fault, it connects with the San Andreas fault Zone. It is estimated to be capable of producing earthquakes with a maximum magnitude (MW) of 7.8, when all of the segments rupture in combination from San Bernardino to Superstition Mountain. The San Jacinto fault has a typical recurrence interval for ground-rupturing earthquakes of 100 to 300 years. Given the proximity of the sites to the San Jacinto and San Andreas fault systems, there have been a number of moderate to large earthquakes that have occurred close to the City of Redlands. A historical earthquake search was performed using the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog (ComCat) (USGS, 2021). This search included earthquakes with magnitudes 5.0+ with epicentral distances of 100 miles of the center of the project sites in Redlands (approximately at the location of Dearborn Reservoir).

The earthquakes with epicenters closest to the City of Redlands water facilities are the 1923 magnitude 6.0 Greater Los Angeles Area earthquake south of Redlands, the 1880 magnitude 5.9 earthquake near Yucaipa, and the 1858 magnitude 6.0 earthquake near San Bernardino, northwest of Redlands. An interesting figure of historical seismic activity in the region is included below. Each white dot represents an historical seismic event.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 540 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
24 Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 541 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
25 Section 3 – Recommended Capital Improvement Program
Recommended program to improve the seismic resiliency of this system, in order of priority:

1. Sunset Reservoir. The Sunset Reservoir dates to 1967. It is in extremely poor condition with no seismic restraint and a lead paint coated
interior. The soil below the reservoir is fractured
granite and potentially unstable. A new reservoir
in this location would require the top ten feet of
soil to be removed. Large Verizon cell towers have
been installed adjacent to the reservoir. In a major
seismic event, the Sunset Reservoir is in danger of
either tipping over into the canyon below,
or in the other direction, into the cell
towers that would affect cell phone
communications, causing critical problem s
if the towers were damaged. For these
reasons, the reservoir should be relocated
to a more suitable, safer location.

The recommendation is broken into two separate phases.

Given the lack of seismic anchorage and likely overturning in a major seismic event, the first phase is to erect a temporary 750,000-gallon bolted steel tank on the parcel north of existing reservoir.

The City can purchase this temporary tank, which can be disassembled, stored, and re-used in the future where needed in the system, possibly as a reclaimed water tank in the Crafton Hills college area. This action is necessary because the Sunset Reservoir has no back-up reservoir to service the 2340 service Zone in this area. The Sand Canyon Reservoir also services the 2340 Zone, but it not hydraulically connected to the Sunset service area; they operate independently of one another.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 542 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
26 If the negotiation is successful, the second phase
is to construct a new partially buried prestressed
10 MG concrete reservoir in the City’s parcel
adjacent to the existing Sunset site. The property
has 4 separate but adjoining parcels, 22 acres in
total. The new reservoir can comfortably be
constructed in this 22-acre parcel, with room for a
possible second 10 MG reservoir at some future
date. These are the largest reservoirs that can be
constructed at this site at the right hydraulic
elevation. The existing Sunset Reservoir is only 3 MG but the additional 7 MG at this location will account for the 6 MG of lost storage in the City due to reduced high-water levels (HWL) to meet current seismic codes. The second phase is to construct a new partially buried prestressed concrete reservoir in the City’s newly acquired parcel adjacent to the existing Sunset site. Sunset Reservoir is one of the City’s most valuable assets as it sits at the highest elevation in the City, allowing gravity flow to 97% of the City’s population. The recommended size is 10 million gallons (MG). A proposed layout is illustrated in the image to the right. The layout shows a potential second reservoir if needed to meet water demands at some future date. These two reservoirs are illustrated in blue; the temporary 750,00-gallon tank is illustrated in red.

The proposed layout would be similar to a
1994 BRADY design for two new 21 MG
prestressed concrete reservoirs at the
Alvarado WTP in the City of San Diego. The
adjacent photo of the completed project will
help visualize what this could look like. The
reservoir on the right includes a Native Plant
Demonstration Garden on the reservoir for
public education purposes of native, drought
tolerant landscaping. Similar joint public use
can be considered for the new Sunset
Reservoir site, which provides an impressive
360-degree view of the area.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 543 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
27 2. (a) Mill Creek Pipeline. The poor condition of
this pipe presents a significant concern about the
extended operating life of this asset. The pipe is
elevated above Mill Creek on concrete piers spaced
approximately 40 feet apart. Numerous large boulders
span the length and width of Mill Creek. The chance of
failure of this pipe during a major seismic event is
significant, as well as during a major storm event where large boulders could damage the piers. Historical
boulder impacts to the existing support piers are
visually evident.

To improve overall reliability of this critical asset, several pipe replacement alternatives will be considered. A second pipeline is only one of these alternatives. The Mill Creek Pipeline delivers raw water for treatment at Tate WTP. This pipeline is critically important to the City’s water security because the Tate WTP can serve more than 85% of the City’s entire population by gravity flow. Maintaining continuous operations of the Tate WTP is therefore essential in a future major seismic event. A possible solution is to construct a second 30-inch diameter inlet pipeline parallel to the existing pipeline under Mill Creek. The pipe should parallel the existing pipe in Mill Creek Road all the way to the inlet structure at the Tate WTP. A dedicated inlet structure should be constructed to receive this new pipeline, and then connect to the existing inlet box for distribution to the reactor clarifiers. The new pipeline should also have a dedicated flow meter located at the plant site. A concept sketch is included below. The City has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the design of this pipeline. Proposals are due February 29, 2022. The consultant selected to predesign and design this pipeline will also be tasked with developing a project budget.

Therefore, our cost table below will not
include a price for the new pipeline given
this cost will be developed by others at
some future date.

Additionally, once the new pipeline is in
operation, the existing piers should be
reinforced as necessary to provide
additional security against catastrophic failure. Flexible expansion joints should be provided on each side of the creek where the pipe comes out of and re-enters the ground.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 544 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
28 (b) Mill Creek 1 and 2 Tanks. The Mill Creek 1 and 2 tanks were erected in 2005 at 200,000 gallons each. The tanks are redundant to each other, so a minimum of 200,000 gallons of storage is needed at all times to provide the desired benefit – supplemental backwash supply to the Tate WTP.

Given the importance of the Tate WTP to the City in a major seismic event, and due to the critical importance of maintaining the assets needed to allow filter backwashing under low plant production rates, the Mill Creek 1 and 2 tanks are in need of rehabilitation. The easiest approach is to build a third Mill Creek tank, but space at the site is very limited. Though it is not a proven industry solution, serious consideration should be given to raising the reservoir roofs as needed to restore the operating volumes of each tank to 200,00 gallons. Seismic anchorage is also required. A budget figure of $500,000 is recommended to resolve this problem as quickly as possible.

3. Agate Reservoir. The Agate Reservoir dates to 1968 and serves as the clearwell reservoir for the Hinckley Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The reservoir does not meet current seismic design codes, but can be brought into compliance by reducing the operating capacity to 2,163,000 gallons which will
decrease stresses in the steel shell and increase the freeboard to allow for sloshing. However, the operating volume of the Agate Reservoir is critically important as the City achieves regulatory CT compliance (concentration x time) inside of Agate Reservoir. The reservoir was retro-fitted in 2010.

Hanging hypalon curtains were secured to the
reservoir roof and floor to create a serpentine
flow pattern inside reservoir to promote
improved mixing for the purposes of obtaining
the regulatory mandated CT credit. The City
uses free chlorine as their primary and
secondary disinfection method. The strength of
a chemical disinfectant (chlorine) for
inactivating pathogens when in contact with
water can be measured by its CT value. CT
values are used to evaluate the inactivation of
pathogens by disinfection using a logarithmic
scale, thus it is referred to as “log inactivation.”
Hypalon curtains shown anchored to the
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 545 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
29 Log inactivation is simply the order of
magnitude in which inactivation of unwanted
organisms occurs and relates to the percentage
of organisms inactivated. The Hypalon curtains
are shown in the figure at the right. There are
many unintended consequences that have
resulted from the installation of the baffle
curtains. In a major seismic event, the sloshing
forces of the water will act on the curtains,
which in turn will collapse the roof, leading to
complete reservoir failure. The curtains may
also become dislodged and plug the outlet pipe
serving gravity flow supply to the City’s largest
reservoirs – Dearborn at 10.6 MG and Highland
at 10.0 MG. The possibility of this occurring will result in losing the Hinckley WTP supply as all of the plant effluent flows through Agate Reservoir. Hinckley provides gravity flow to 40% of the City’s population.

We recommend no further financial investments be made at the Agate Reservoir. A new 60-inch diameter pipe parallel to the existing 30-inch plant effluent pipeline will allow the City to achieve CT compliance in piping, not a baffled circular reservoir where the flow circulation pattern is not ideal. Ideal situations are not present in a water storage tank. Depending on the degree of short -circuiting, baffling factors can be anywhere from the ideal pipe plug flow of 1, to less than 0.1 for a poorly designed system. Higher baffling factors mean less short circuiting, a higher CT, and a better disinfection outcome. Recent CT tracer studies indicate that baffles provide a baffling factor of 0.68, but come with the risk of reservoir failure.

An extract from the USEPA Manual of Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking (1999) is provided below and gives baffling factors for various types of tanks. As noted above, these examples show that a pipe is the ideal system and an un-baffled tank is the worst.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 546 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
30 Baffling Condition Baffling Factor Description
Unbaffled (mixed flow) 0.1
None, agitated basin, very low length
to width ratio, high inlet and outlet
flow velocities. Can be approximately
achieved in flask mix tank.

Poor 0.3
Single or multiple inlets and outlets, no
intra-basin baffles
Average 0.5
Baffled inlet or outlet with some intrabasin baffles
Superior 0.7
Perforated inlet baffle, serpentine or
perforated intra-basin baffles, outlet
weir or perforated launders
Perfect (plug flow) 1
Very high length to width ratio
(pipeline flow) (greater than 40:1),
perforated inlet, outlet, and intra basin
baffles
Unbaffling CT
Disinfection of water with chlorine requires time for the chemical to react with and kill the target microbial pathogens. Ideally, the time for the reaction is provided in a purpose-built reactor or contact tank specifically designed for this purpose and which provides a controllable process.

However, the reality of how to implement an ideal solution is quite different. Most water supplies rely on disinfection to occur in tanks and reservoirs of various sizes, with various arrangements of inlet and outlet structures and varying levels of short-circuiting. The effective contact time is often less than is assumed.

An Idea that is Too Good to Ignore – Obtain CT in a Pipe When water flows in a pipe at a constant flowrate, there is very little mixing along the length of the pipe, such that a volume of water entering the pipe at one end will exit the pipe at virtually the same time and condition at the end of the pipe. There is also no possibility of water entering the pipe to short-circuit to the outlet any faster than the rest of the water. This ‘no mixing and no short-circuiting” option is the ideal situation and is called plug flow. Plug flow in a pipe. An ideal situation for disinfection.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 547 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
31 As all the water passes down the pipe at the same time, the time that the first 10% leaves the pipe is very similar to the time that all the water leaves the pipe. This means the baffling factor is 1: the ideal contact tank.

Flow Rate (MGD) = 14.5
Flow Rate (ft^3/sec) = 26.94
Temperature (deg C) = 13.6
pH = 8.4
Residual Chlorine (mg/L) = 1
Baffling Factor = 1
Log Removal = 0.5
Contact Time (min*mg/L) = 24.2
Actual Detention Time (min) = 24.2
Theoretical Detention Time
(min) = 24.2
Volume (ft^3) =
Gallons =
32,532
243,347
Pipe Diameter (in) = 60
Pipe Area (ft^2) = 19.6
Length of Pipe (ft) = 1657
Since the new 60-inch pipe will parallel the existing 30-inch pipe, both pipes will contribute to achieving CT compliance. The equivalent diameter of a 60-inch and 30-inch pipe is 64.04 inches.

Using this larger equivalent pipe diameter, the new 60-inch minimum length is 1,454 feet. More than adequate room is available to achieve this outcome. The City will have a long-term solution where CT is always achieved, 100% of the time without a contribution from the seismically challenged Agate Reservoir. Once the new pipe is installed, the hypalon curtains can be removed to protect the reservoir and the system so the existing Agate Reservoir can remain in service at a reduced operating level. The 60-inch pipe will also provide a supplemental storage volume of

0.22 MG. The estimated construction cost of the new proposed 60-inch pipeline is approximately $3,725,000. This estimate includes a 15% estimating contingency. The City can therefore avoid the $5M plus cost to replace Agate with a new tank.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 548 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
32 Proposed Layout
Fortunately, there is adequate space to
construct a new 60-inch pipeline
parallel to the existing 30-inch pipe to
achieve CT between the filter effluent
control structure at the Hinckley WTP
and the meter located on the east side
of the Agate Reservoir. The proposed
layout is shown in the figure to the right.

The existing meter can be retained. A
second effluent weir will be needed
downstream of the meter to provide
submergence for flow measuring accuracy. Two pipes will exit the weir structure and connect to existing piping for delivery to the system and the 10.6 MG Dearborn and 10 MG Highland Reservoirs down gradient.

4. Highland Reservoir. The rectangular concrete reservoir is in fair condition, but does require immediate action to correct a minor seismic deficiency. The Highland design has some unique structural features due to the presence of
recreational activities on the reservoir roof. As a result of anticipating the associated live loads from these
activities, the structure generally meets current
seismic design codes.

The problem to be
solved relates to the
roof diaphragm. The
presence of slip
dowels in the existing
roof design (although designed to allow for thermal
expansion/contraction), do not transfer seismic loads from roof diaphragm to walls. In a (horizontal) seismic event, the roof slab could collapse. A structural beam (reinforced with 16- #10 bars) around the entire perimeter will contain and transfer diaphragm loads to walls per the detail shown at the right.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 549 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
33 5. Fifth Avenue Reservoir. The only reservoir at risk is the 5 MG Fifth Avenue Reservoir.

This reservoir is a key storage reservoir for the Tate WTP as water transfers into the lower system elevations. Water stored in Fifth Avenue is pumped to the 2340 Zone (Sand Canyon Reservoirs).

The loss of Fifth Avenue for any reason would restrict
operations. The site of the Fifth Avenue reservoir and
pump station is located within a County Fault Zone for
the Reservoir Canyon fault, which was adopted in the
Countywide Policy Map in October 2020. As shown in
the figures at the left and below, the edge of the
County Fault Zone passes through the middle of the
Fifth Avenue property. The Reservoir Canyon Fault is
a normal fault that is part of the Crafton Hills Fault
Zone. The fault trace is mapped about 400 feet away from the closest location to the Fifth Avenue reservoir. Therefore, there may be potential for
surface rupture, or associated off-fault
deformations at the site from movement of the
Reservoir Canyon fault reaching the ground surface
at the Fifth Avenue site. The County of San
Bernardino Development Code, Chapter 82.15.040
(b) requires that a structure used for critical facilities (such as a reservoir) be located 150 feet or farther
from any active earthquake fault trace. Additionally, the San Bernardino County-Wide Plan (County of San Bernardino, 2020) for mitigation of natural environmental hazards states in Policy HZ-6:
“We require new critical and essential facilities to be located outside of hazard areas, whenever feasible.”
Per Table S-2 of the County of San Bernardino General Plan, Land Use Compatibility Chart in Fault Hazard Zones, essential land uses are “restricted” in fault hazard Zones, which is defined as:
“Restricted unless alternative sites are not available or feasible and it is demonstrated through a site investigation that, although mitigation may be difficult, hazards will be adequately mitigated.”
However, the restricted use and requirements for earthquake fault Zones have generally applied to new structures or any existing structures where the alterations/additions to the structure are greater than 50 percent of the value of the structure. Since the Fifth Avenue Reservoir was constructed in 1974, and design drawings were not located in the City’s records, we cannot confidently prepare design improvements to the existing structure that would be needed to satisfy the likely very restrictive design criteria.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 550 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
34 Fifth Avenue is the only City reservoir that
is near an active fault. As required by
codes, new structures or improvements at
the Fifth Avenue site will require a sitespecific surface fault rupture investigation performed in accordance with California
Geological Survey (CGS) Note 49,
Guidelines for Evaluating the Hazard of
Surface Fault Rupture. We recommend
excavating the fault trench location shown
on the figure to the right. The trench excavation will be approximately 3 feet wide and up to 10 feet deep.

Fortunately, the reservoir walls are completely buried with a column supported exposed concrete roof. Major structure damage that may occur in an earthquake will fortunately not result in a tidal wave of water causing damage to other structures. However, the loss of Fifth Avenue will cause an operational nightmare for City staff. Replacing this reservoir with a prestressed concrete reservoir designed to AWWA D110, Type 1 (cast in place concrete walls) provides the City with the best protection in a future seismic event. Fortunately, there is available space on the existing site for a new reservoir. Though the guidance suggests we find an alternate site for a new reservoir positioned a safe distance away from the Reservoir Canyon Fault, there do not appear to be any other suitable sites available that meet the hydraulic reality. Fifth Avenue was likely designed by James M. Montgomery (JMM), the dominant reservoir design firm of this era, and the shape and burial fit the JMM standard design in the 1970s. Dearborn and Highland also have completely buried walls and exposed concrete roofs and were designed by JMM. They were all constructed in the 1970s within a four-year span. (Dearborn 1972, Fifth Avenue 1974, and Highland 1976). Fifth Avenue sits in the ground because of the way it is designed, not because of hydraulics.

The Tate WTP serves the 2100 Zone, supplies water to Fifth Avenue by gravity to serve the 1900 Zone below Fifth Avenue. The existing reservoir is below ground, not for hydraulic reasons, but required by the type of design in 1974. Non-circular reservoir shapes are rarely constructed at grade. With the significant static head available (200 feet) the new reservoir can sit at grade, 30- 40 feet higher than the existing HWL elevation in Fifth Avenue. The hydraulic model confirmed this change is possible.

The geophysical survey conducted at the site indicates that the upper 3 to 8 feet at the site are more disturbed and/or less dense (likely fill). Below 10 feet, the shear wave velocities increase with depth, indicating the soils increase in stiffness and become denser, with shear wave velocities ranging from about 900 ft/s to about 1,400 ft/s. Based on the seismic velocity measurements obtained, the resulting average VS,30 is 1,156 ft/s (352 m/s).

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 551 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
35 A Brief Clarification of Risk at the Fifth Avenue Reservoir Site It should be noted that throughout the City’s system, compliance with current seismic codes is clearly the goal, however, compliance with current code does not guarantee that a reservoir constructed before 1994 (Northridge earthquake, the last regional earthquake of significance) would not be seriously damaged in an earthquake. For example, most of the City’s 12 steel tanks can be made code compliant by simply lowering the operating levels. Various recommendations to bring structures “up to code” only addresses the hazard of strong ground shaking. In no way does it mitigate the hazard of surface fault rupture.

It should be noted that any modifications to any of the reservoirs will trigger the requirement to bring the reservoir up to all codes per the California Water Resources Control Board Department of Drinking Water. The plans would need to be submitted to the Water Board for approval and permitting.

The 5th Ave reservoir is mapped in very close proximity to Reservoir Canyon Fault. If that fault were to rupture, there would potentially be feet of displacement that could occur both horizontally and vertically. The existing reservoir could not withstand that level of movement, it would be severely damaged. If you want to strengthen the existing reservoir for both ground shaking and surface fault rupture, a much more intensive structural strengthening would be required. Even without design drawings to review, our structural team believes you would have to replace the foundation with a rigid mat foundation, and also consider strengthening the walls.

There may also be other options to consider, like placement of geofoam or some sort of compressible foam behind the walls, to reduce pressures and allow some movement without damage to the walls.

For some additional background - there has been some research on the topic of designing or strengthening structures to cross active faults, and observations from prior earthquakes. These studies suggest that continuous, rigid foundations perform better when spanning over a fault.

There have been a couple of documented case histories from Turkey to support this, as well as numerical modeling studies. Also, UC Berkeley performed a seismic retrofit of Bowles Hall in 2008 and a portion of the building was found to span across the Hayward fault. They performed studies to identify the fault, estimate fault displacement, and then they designed the area with a new mat foundation and flexible retaining walls that could deform as part of the retrofit. At this stage of our dialogue we suggest the City considering locating the fault as soon as possible; at this moment we need to assume it is right there where it is mapped.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 552 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
36 In light of these facts, we recommend that
the best path forward is to abandon the
existing structure and replace it with a 5-
million-gallon prestressed concrete reservoir
designed to withstand the likelihood of
significant ground movement in this location.

A new Fifth Avenue Pump Station, adjacent
to the new reservoir at grade, should be
designed to lift water from the Fifth Avenue
Reservoir directly up to Sunset Reservoir. A
proposed location of the new reservoir and
new pipeline is shown on the figures above and below.

6. Margarita Reservoir. The rectangular concrete
reservoir is in poor condition and requires immediate
attention to correct structural or seismic deficiencies.

The roof and walls do not meet current seismic codes.

The roof will likely collapse in a major seismic event.

The walls are deficient for combined hydrostatic and
seismic loading. The only practical upgrade solution is to construct a “tank within a tank” by first removing the roof and then constructing new walls, footing, and floor.

In this solution, the wall height can be increased to
provide more storage in this footprint if desired. The
new roof can either be concrete or an aluminum dome.

Alternatively, pending the results of the reservoir consolidation study, it is highly likely we can eliminate this reservoir by constructing more storage at a higher hydraulic gradient (Sunset). The reservoir could then be demolished and the property sold for residential use. It is recommended that any action regarding Margarita be postponed until the consolidate study is complete and accepted by the City and other stakeholders.

7. Steel Tanks. A Brief History of Southern California Steel Tanks Designs – Why does Redlands have so many? Over the past century, the decision on what type of tank to design has depended primarily on the entity that is paying the initial costs. Steel was an easy early choice because most tanks built for developing cities were small, typically 1 MG or less, and had low initial capital costs. As cities continued to grow, larger tank volumes were needed that made steel less practical for sizes of 3 MG or greater. This is likely the City’s history as well.

Steel was scarce during World War II; concrete was the only practical choice. Advances in the understanding of how concrete behaves in hydraulic structures led to tank size increases up to Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 553 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
37 40 MG. The explosive growth in California after World War II led to considerable urban growth.

Cities and agencies began tasking residential developers with the responsibility – and costs – of developing water infrastructure. Developers typically choose the lowest cost options, thus resulting in hundreds of small steel tanks being constructed from San Diego to Santa Barbara.

Once in service, operations and maintenance responsibilities and expenses were transferred to the end utility. This is primarily why the City eventually has so many small steel tanks, with the associated high maintenance cost (corrosion control, painting). Twelve of the City's 18 storage tanks are steel, representing approximate 66% of the total storage, however after the HWL’s are lowered, they will provide only 31 % (14.1 MG) of the City’s total storage volume of 45.1 MG.

The City’s six concrete reservoirs provide 31 MG of storage.

Seismic Assessment of the City’s 12 Steel Tanks
Design of the City’s welded steel tanks likely followed American Water Works Association’s Standard D100 – Welded Carbon Steel Tanks for Water Storage, which has a history dating back to 1941. Steel tank evaluations are fairly straightforward compared to reinforced concrete (RC) because the entire tank exterior is visible as well as the inside when drained; only the underside of the floor is hidden from view. Typical problems in older tanks erected prior to 1978 are the possible presence of lead paint and coal tar enamel coatings on the interior. Corrosion of the steel over the decades is another obvious major concern. As we have determined from our structural calculations, very few of the City’s steel tanks meet current seismic design codes.

In order to better understand the seismic resilience of the City’s steel tanks, a series of calculations was performed based on AWWA D100-11 standards. These calculations are used to check for three primary failure mechanisms within the steel tank structure: (1) adequate freeboard and sloshing, (2) seismic overturning, and (3) allowable stress development in the shell.

A table representing these findings in both the seismic and static case is provided on the following page. Although all of the tanks satisfied static standards, they failed when subjected to design level earthquake standards. The tanks without seismic anchorage along their perimeters usually failed in both seismic overturning and stress development in the shell. Additionally, the tank shells were not constructed with sufficient freeboard to contain the calculated sloshing. If the high-water lines (HWL) of the tanks cannot be lowered sufficiently, then seismic retrofitting would be required (i.e., mechanical anchorage, increased shell thickness, or increased shell height). Retrofitting is not required if the HWL is lowered to the recommended values provided in the table below.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 554 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
38 Tank Date
Constructed
Overall
Grade Diameter Height of Shell
Height to
Diameter Ratio
Agate Reservoir 1968 C 143'-0" 25'-6" 0.18
Arroyo 1965 D 46'-6" 40'-6" 0.87
Crafton Hills 1970 C 76'-0" 30'-6" 0.40
Mill Creek E 2005 B 47'-0" 16'-0" 0.34
Mill Creek W 2005 B 47'-0" 16'-0" 0.34
Sand Canyon 1973 C 122'-0" 40'-0" 0.33
Smiley 1964 C 127'-0" 32'-6" 0.26
South 1964 C 111'-0" 26'-6" 0.24
Texas Grove 2004 B 180'-0" 25'-0" 0.14
Texas Street 1956 D 70'-0" 35'-3" 0.50
Ward Way 1958 D 104'-0" 32'-0" 0.31
The recommended reductions in operating levels at each of the City’s steel tanks, including the justification for the reduction, is summarized in the table on the following page.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 555 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
39 Tank
Current
Operating
Volume
Operating
Volume to
Meet Code
Operational
Capacity % Reduction Justification
Agate
Reservoir 3,000,000 2,163,000 72%
Extreme Stresses Developed in 1st and 2nd
layer plates when subjected to seismic
loading
Arroyo 500,000 194,400 39% Seismic anchorage required to resist overturning and not enough freeboard
Crafton Hills 1,000,000 780,500 78%
Extreme stresses in multiple layers of tank
shell under seismic loading and insufficient
freeboard.

Mill Creek E 200,000 90,420 45% Seismic anchorage required to resist overturning and not enough freeboard
Mill Creek W 200,000 90,420 45% Seismic anchorage required to resist overturning and not enough freeboard
Sand Canyon 3,500,000 2,658,000 76%
Extreme stresses in multiple layers of tank
shell in both seismic and static case,
freeboard was also not sufficient
Smiley 3,000,000 2,037,000 68%
Extreme stress in first layer of tank shell in
seismic case, freeboard was also not
sufficient
South 2,000,000 1,412,000 71% Freeboard not sufficient
Texas Grove 4,000,000 2,760,000 69%
Extreme stresses in multiple layers of tank
shell in both seismic and static case,
freeboard was also not sufficient
Texas Street 1,000,000 642,000 64% Seismic anchorage required to resist overturning and not enough freeboard
Ward Way 2,000,000 1,322,000 66% Freeboard not sufficient Total: 20,400,000 14,149,740 69% Entire system will be reduced 30% in order to meet seismic standards
*Seismic reductions based on AWWA D100-11 and do not consider hydraulic or fire requirements
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 556 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
40 Hydraulic and fire flow demands were not considered in this structural analysis; lowering the tank operating level may cause the tanks to be deficient in meeting those requirements. As noted in the table, the steel tanks provide 20.4 MG of storage volume in their current operating mode.

Lowering the elevations as recommend will result in the loss of more than 6 MG of storage. This supports the idea of consolidation, as this storage can be replaced in properly designed prestressed concrete tanks – the best seismic designed tank in the industry today – at the highest elevation possible, which makes the Sunset site the ideal location. The steel tanks could be seismically retrofitted with mechanical anchorage; however, this would only alleviate the issues in overturning and would not satisfy the freeboard requirements. The steel tank shells could have a dual retrofit by raising the tank shells and anchoring the systems. This process would require the excavation of the existing foundations to be replaced by deeper foundations and the tank being structurally modified, which is very cost prohibitive and not recommended. The majority of the City’s tanks are also very old, Texas Street dates to 1956 and only three have been erected since 1973, which makes all of the steel tanks close to 50 years old or older. The industry standard for steel tanks is 50 years, so we recommend no further investments be made in this infrastructure.

8. Texas Street Steel Tank. The reservoir is in
poor condition. The reservoir could possibly be
replaced in the existing reservoir footprint at a size not less than 1 MG and as large as 2.4 MG to make up for
the storage deficiency at Texas Grove due to need to
operate at a lower height to meet seismic codes. In
the short term to meet current seismic codes, the
reservoir high water elevation needs to be reduced by
38% (13.4 feet), resulting in a revised operating
volume of 619,000 gallons. This is a significant loss of storage. Lowering the operating depth is necessary to
increase freeboard for sloshing and to decrease the
extreme steel shell stress under seismic conditions. It is therefore recommended that the reservoir not be operated at full capacity. The possibility for overturning, sliding, and water loss being released are high in a seismic event if operated at full capacity. Given the size and age of this tank, retroactively equipping the tank with seismic anchorage is not recommended.

Replacement or abandonment is recommended. The final decision about Texas Street should be postponed until the reservoir consolidation study is complete and accepted by the City and other stakeholders. If the reservoir is eventually abandoned, the pump station would need to be relocated to the Texas Grove Reservoir site.

In the table below, an overall grade has been established to provide an easy means for understanding the condition of all City reservoirs. The tanks noted with a B Grade were relatively recently constructed, but still require a reduction in operating high water levels. However, due to the age of these tanks, they are in decent shape, recently painted, and in the case of Texas Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 557 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
41 Grove, seismic anchors were installed. The Mill Creek E and W tanks, with an age of less than 20 years, are, unfortunately, seismically deficient. This is important as they provide supplemental backwash storage supply for the self-backwashing filters at the Tate WTP. Sufficient storage for this purpose is still available, but both tanks must be added together to make this work. Even though there are two tanks, there is no backup tank now with the reduced volumes.

8. The Good News Regarding the City’s Concrete Reservoirs. The City’s concrete reservoirs are in much better condition than the steel tanks. The 10 MG Dearborn Reservoir is a rectangular concrete design, is in fair condition and requires no immediate attention or action to correct any structural or seismic deficiencies. Dearborn also has completely buried walls and exposed concrete roofs and were designed by JMM, the dominant reservoir designer of that era.

Structural and seismic improvements were also implemented in 2014. The design was very conservative. The original seventy-seven (77) columns were structurally enhanced and a new interior footing was placed around the entire reservoir interior. Unlike Highland, the roof is now protected from collapse with the new interior footing. The original 14-inch square columns were enlarged to 30-inch square columns. The columns were accessed by cutting 54-inch square holes in the roof. Forms were placed around the existing columns and concrete was placed from the top. The holes in the roof were patched with concrete. The reservoir circulation design could be improved. Short-circuiting is likely occurring, as there are no barriers to stop the inlet water from flowing directly to the outlet sump. All other water outside of this “river” is not moving and will become stagnant over time. This lack of baffling, has resulted in a significant dead Zone above the inlet pipe, a layer of water that is 13.75 feet deep (centerline elevation 1564.25 feet to the high-water elevation 1578.00 feet).

Inserting baffles is not recommended. It is unnecessarily costly and will require anchorage to the existing columns, a seismic loading condition that is not recommended. A simple reconfiguration of the inlet pipeline to include better flow distribution can be considered. A Computational Flow Dynamics (CFD) Model was developed to examine potential inlet pipe improvements. At a minimum, a simple raising of the inlet pipe discharge elevation to force a “top to bottom” flow pattern should be considered.

The other concrete reservoirs that appear
to be safe are Country Club 1 and 2.

Country Club 1 Reservoir is the City’s
oldest reservoir dating back to 1924. The
reservoir is 20 feet high, with a diameter
of 102.42 feet. The reservoir is buried with
an exposed roof. The reservoir was built
as a conventionally reinforced concrete
tank in 1924. An aluminum roof was
added in 1980 and the tank was lined with
steel plates in 2010, so technically the
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 558 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
42 reservoir can now be considered a steel tank. The new steel tank rests within the old concrete structure and overall is in fairly good condition. However, the steel wall and old concrete wall are not structurally connected. It appears the steel tank improvement was implemented strictly to resolve a leakage problem with the old concrete reservoir and is technically a liner. The roof was also replaced for the second time. Due to the improvements in the reservoir that have been in the past 40, and because the reservoir walls are completely below ground, the reservoir is in fair condition and does not require immediate attention or action.

The reservoir passes all seismic requirements outlined by AWWA D100-11. The interior of the tank had no major notable issues other than sediment build up on the tank floor.

Country Club 2
Reservoir dates back
to 1969. The reservoir
is a conventionally
reinforced concrete
structure, 16.25 feet
high, with a diameter of 140 feet. The reservoir is buried with an exposed concrete roof. The reservoir was designed by James M. Montgomery (JMM). JMM was the dominant
design firm in Southern California at the time of this design (1974) and the characteristics of this reservoir follows the JMM standard concrete reservoir design. The existing
concrete reservoir is in fair condition and does not require any immediate maintenance at this time. Given the age and size of this reservoir, no further investment should be made at this site. Both Country 1 and 2 should be maintained in service to provide additional water security to the City. The reservoirs are very high in the City’s hydraulic profile and pump water up to the Sunset Reservoir area. Beyond the
water treatment plants, Sunset will become the City’s most valuable water asset and having at least two ways to get water up the “hill” is critical. The other Sunset supply source will be the new reservoir and pump station at the Fifth Avenue Reservoir site. Improvements to the Country Club pump station should be made a necessary to assure the reliability of this facility. A new permanent emergency generator is in the City’s current plans, so no further action is needed at the County Club site.

Overall, the City’s concrete reservoirs have done the job they were designed to do, and have long useful lives ahead.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 559 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
43 Section 4 – Pump Station Assessments
The pump stations were evaluated by a team of experts in the mechanical, electrical, civil and structural engineering disciplines. Visual and prominent operational conditions were observed and additional structural assessments (with supporting calculations) were provided when warranted. Consideration was given to each structure with respect to fire hardening, which typically resulted in the recommendation to clear adjacent landscaping to minimize any fire risk.

Lack of emergency power was not identified; it was assumed that portable emergency generators are utilized as needed. The presence of hazardous materials onsite was investigated and documented in the August 2021 Limited Asbestos and Lead Survey prepared by Group Delta Consultants, Inc.

It should be noted that because of the importance of the Country Club and Highland Reservoirs (serving as a “control hub for many other components”); the March 2011 draft Master Plan prepared by URS recommended particular “focus on the operations of these two most complex reservoir systems and their associated PRV and booster systems”.

Following is a summary of our findings and recommendations.

1. Texas St. Pump Station. Station consists of four exposed electric driven vertical turbine pumps (circa 1960’s) that are generally in good condition with a capacity to deliver 7800 gpm from Zone 1350 to Zone 1570. The March 2011 draft Master Plan prepared by URS recommends (pg. 92) “further examining” the idea of upsizing all four existing pumps.

The reinforced CMU structure houses electrical controls/equipment and does not meet current seismic code; additional reinforcement is required. Replacement of the main 5kV distribution switchgear, general housekeeping within the structure and minor mechanical/electrical modifications are recommended; as well as minor site improvements including paving, security, lighting and maintenance to minimize fire risk.

The pump station shares a large site with the Texas Reservoir, a potable water well and treatment equipment and an extensive filter treatment chain which is no longer in full-time service but occupies most of the site. The plant is still used to supplement non-potable water storage needs.

To discourage vandalism and related problems as recently experienced, removal of equipment/facilities no longer in use is recommended. Additionally, re-evaluating and possibly re-purposing the entire site should be considered, potentially relocating/upsizing pumping equipment to the Texas Grove Reservoir site.

2. Ward Way Pump Station. Station consists of two electric driven pumps contained within a very small metal structure, with a capacity to deliver 310 gpm from Zone 2100 to Zone 2340.

Although pumps appear to have been very recently replaced, the structure is severely undersized and in a state of disrepair; with an inefficient piping layout and limited accessibility for equipment maintenance/installation/removal. The roof, walls and floor are in a state of disrepair with deteriorating soundproofing the likely cause of neighbors’ noise complaints. A structural Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 560 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
44 assessment was not performed because the recommendation is to replace the entire structure with a larger, quieter, code complaint structure that can accommodate equipment and provide access for operations and maintenance.

Site paving improvements, lighting and security are recommended, as well as the replacement of the electrical equipment and instrumentation.

3. Dearborn Pump Station. Station consists of two exposed electric driven vertical turbine pumps with a capacity to deliver 2060gpm from Zone 1570 to Zones 1750 and 1900, a piping/valve vault, exposed electrical cabinets, and a small CMU structure that houses electrical controls/equipment.

Pumps appeared to be in satisfactory condition, with some leakage observed. No major concerns were noted. The construction of asphalt or concrete paving is recommended adjacent to the pumps and electrical equipment to protect equipment and facilitate maintenance. Site lighting and security improvements are also suggested, as well as modifications to piping appurtenances and electrical equipment for enhanced operator convenience.

Chrysotile ACM, Crocidolite AMC, lead, chromium and zinc were detected on site. The Chrysotile ACM and Crocidolite AMC were found on a piece of transite pipe that was at the site (debris on the ground) near the pump station shed. The chromium, lead and zinc were found on paint chip samples.

South, Sand Canyon, Highland and 5th Avenue Pump Stations The pumping stations at the South, Sand Canyon, Highland and 5th Avenue reservoirs share a common piping layout and equipment design, contained within an enclosed steel moment frame structure. These structures are generally in good condition and can withstand gravity loading, but additional lateral structural support is required to meet seismic code. This is true for each of the four pump stations; a “benefit-cost” decision is necessary to determine if these structural improvements are worth the capital cost. It may be concluded that failure of the structure is acceptable following a seismic event, as long as the station continues pumping water.

Equipment at each of these four stations is in varying stages of replacement need, with some parts nearly obsolete. When appropriate, it is recommended that they be replaced with newer (preferably off the shelf) versions for inventory availability, flexibility and uniformity.

The structures do not typically contain combustible materials, nor are there openings for errant flying embers, however routine clearing of nearby dry vegetation will reduce fire risk. Lead, chromium and zinc were found at all locations. Chrysotile ACM was also detected at each of these sites with the exception of the Highland facility, where no evidence of asbestos was reported. The Chrysotile ACM and Crocidolite AMC were found on a piece of transite pipe that was at the site (debris on the ground) near the pump station shed. The chromium, lead and zinc were found on paint chip samples.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 561 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
45 Additional characteristics and conclusions unique to each of these four stations are identified below.

4. South Pump Station. Station consists of five pumps (circa 1962-1968); three contained within a steel moment frame structure (circa 1964). These four-horizontal split-case and one vertical turbine pump have the capacity to deliver 5956 gpm from Zone 1750. Pumps P-1927 and P-1928 deliver to Zone 1900. Pumps P-2124, P-2125, and P-2126 deliver to Zone 2100. The March 2011 draft Master Plan prepared by URS states that, “Additional pumps are recommended for P-1927”.

Upgrading the vertical turbine applications with premium efficient motors and heavy-duty bearings is recommended to support the significant investment of VFD controllers. Replacement of the pump starter panels for P-1927 and P-2126, is also recommended, as well as reconstruction of the failing retaining walls. Paving, security and other site improvements, as well as replacement/upgrade of miscellaneous equipment and parts are also suggested.

5. 5th Avenue Pump Station. Two horizontal split-case pumps installed in late 1969 are contained within a steel moment frame structure; two vertical turbine pumps with a barrel to accommodate a third vertical turbine pump assembly are located outside the structure. Record drawings show natural gas engine conversions to electric motors in late 1997.

The pump station, pumps and motors generally appear to be in good condition with only minor improvements suggested, however, paving improvements for the access road are recommended for improved access, particularly in an emergency situation. Interior piping appears to be in good condition with no signs of deterioration, corrosion or leakage; however significant condensation near meter was observed which might veil leakage around connections. Exterior piping shows signs of above grade spalling, potentially indicating a more serious problem below grade.

Recommend improving access to valves in below grade vault for operator convenience.

6. Sand Canyon Pump Station. Station consists of two electric driven horizontal split-case pumps (circa 1972) with a capacity to deliver 3783gpm from Zone 2340 to Zone 2600.

We recommend immediate replacement of pump starter panels, additional lighting, and site paving/drainage improvements to better control offsite runoff and extend life of pavement.

Minor equipment/parts replacement as well as minor mechanical/electrical modifications are also recommended to enhance operator convenience.

7. Highland Pump Station. Station consists of six electric driven horizontal split-case pumps (circa 1961-62) and two booster pumps (circa 1976) and a steel moment frame structure constructed in 1966 with a combined capacity to deliver 6600gpm from Zone 1570 to Zones 1750 Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 562 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
46 and Zone 2100.

Minor maintenance and painting are recommended, as well as regular housekeeping/monitoring of miscellaneous stockpiled items to avoid interference with pumping operations. Minor site paving and drainage improvements are suggested, and minor mechanical/electrical modifications to enhance operator convenience. Extending the vertical turbine booster pump can and motor base to above grade (leaving discharge at existing elevation) will offer better protection if vault floods.

OTHER
The pumping operations at the Country Club and Smiley Heights reservoirs were also visited, although all pumping equipment is exposed and there are no structures located onsite. General observations and recommendations are provided below.

8. Country Club Pump Station. The pumping equipment at the Country Club Reservoir site consists of three electrically driven submersible pumps and one vertical turbine pump that appear to be in good working order and together have the capacity to deliver 3427gpm from Zone 2100 to Zone 2340. There also exists an abandoned underground pump station on the south side of the site, between the two reservoirs. Piping and appurtenances appear to be in good working order, with no leakage or evidence of malfunction observed. Minor recommendations regarding site drainage, lighting and security are suggested.

The existing electrical system is generally in good condition, including a 600V, 800A, 3-phase, 60HZ manual/automatic transfer switch with an external generator connection capable of connecting a 600kW portable generator; enough capacity to fully support the complete site electrical system in an emergency/stand-by power situation.

Site not tested for asbestos; lead, chromium and zinc were detected on site.

9. Smiley Heights Pump Station. The two exposed electric driven submersible pumps have the capacity to deliver 720gpm from Zone 1570 to Zone 1750 and are generally in good condition, requiring no immediate attention. Minor recommendations regarding security, lighting, landscaping and electrical and piping modifications to enhance operator convenience are suggested.

Site not tested for asbestos; lead, chromium and zinc were detected on site.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 563 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
47 Section 5 – Prestressed Concrete Reservoir Design
Closing Words – Why is BRADY’s Support for Prestressed Concrete Reservoir Design So Strong? BRADY’s corporate knowledge regarding reservoir design preferences has been shaped by the many decades key members of our design team have spent in the planning, design, and construction of reservoirs of all shapes, sizes, and materials. BRADY’s structural team also includes Max Dykmans, P.E., S.E., the former President and Owner of DYK, prior to their merger with Natgun in 2011 to form what is known as DN Tanks today. A summary of this experience is included in the table below:

Name Years of
Experience
Comments
Richard Brady,
P.E., BCEE
41 Design experience with all reservoir types, shapes, and size; largest tank, conventional rectangular concrete, 52 MG
(Sydney, Australia)
Karl Kuebitz,
P.E.
22 Former Design Manager for DYK/DN Tanks; world’s largest prestressed concrete reservoirs, 4 @ 42 MG
Lee Biggers,
P.E., S.E.
55 Mr. Biggers was inducted as a Fellow of the Structural Engineers Association of California in 2010; Structural Engineer of Record for more than 50 circular prestressed and conventional concrete reservoirs
Max Dykmans,
P.E., S.E.
46 Former Owner and President of DYK; builder of more than 3,000 prestressed concrete reservoirs over 40 years
The professional experience of Mr. Dykmans and Mr. Kuebitz is primarily as designers of prestressed concrete reservoirs designed to AWWA D110, Type 1 spanning back to the 1970’s.

Mr. Brady and Mr. Biggers have experience in all reservoir types, shapes, and sizes ranging from 630,000 gallons to 52 MG. At one time Mr. Brady was the designer of the largest prestressed reservoir in California when he
was the designer of 2-21 MG
reservoirs at the City of San Diego’s Alvarado WTP in 1994. Mr.

Brady eclipsed his California record and the entire world, when his 35 MG Earl Thomas Reservoir began construction in 2001 for the City of San Diego (photo at the right). All three reservoirs are shown in the picture at the right.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 564 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
48 Our company’s Engineer Manager, Karl Kuebitz, P.E. was also the leader of our structural efforts on this project. Mr. Kuebitz, P.E. has been involved in the site development, design and construction of hundreds of Type 1 prestressed concrete tanks over 20-years, including the largest in the World at 42 Million Gallons (MG). And not just one, but four at this size.

There is no doubt we favor the prestressed design, for the reasons discussed herein., Below is a short history of what we have collectively learned after all of these years for the benefit of the City of Redlands.

What Have We Learned as a Group After all These Years?

1. Circular shapes are best for storing water. Very easy to design, all forces are radial and circumferential.

2. Avoid odd shapes (trapezoids) where
structural design forces are difficult to
analyze. A catastrophic failure of a 30
MG conventionally reinforced tank in
the initial hydrostatic test in 1994 was
a true “lesson learned” for the water
industry (see photo, right). It didn’t
take long to figure out this was a design
error. (Not a BRADY project.)

3. In areas of seismic concern, the premier reservoir design choice is prestressed concrete designed to AWWA D110, Type 1.

4. Avoid attempts to make something cheaper. A
prestressed design concept developed in the 1960’s,
known in the industry as the “Pritzker System”, became
notorious because of a 5 MG reservoir failure in 1998.

Pritzker Tanks were a proprietary system that enjoyed
moderate success
in the 1960's,
building around
two dozen tanks in
the United States, most of which in Southern
California. The Pritzker System relied on 8'-0" wide
by 2'-8" deep "U" shaped precast panels. The "U"
shape varied from 4 to 8 inches in thickness.

Although relatively thin, the "U" shape was to
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 565 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
49 provide the required stiffness to span from floor to roof. The precast panels were stacked next to each other to form a circle and then an internal tendon ring beam was cast at the top and bottom of the wall. There was no continuity or reinforcing between any of the panels, instead the hoop force was entirely taken at the top and bottom of the wall in the ring beam. The 5.0 MG Westminster Reservoir that failed on September 21, 1998, at 5:45 a.m. was a Pritzker design (see photo, above). The tank failed quickly through a single wall panel, releasing its entire contents in a matter of minutes, resulting in significant property damage and several minor injuries. Fortunately, there were no fatalities. It is believed that a poor detail used in the bottom ring beam was the cause of the failure.

5. Minimize construction joints to reduce the amount of waterstop needed. Most reservoirs that experience excessive leakage is often the result of a folded waterstop, not cracks.

Cracks can be fixed; folded waterstops are difficult to locate and a challenge to fix.

6. If possible, complete burial of reservoirs constructed out of concrete is preferred. A conventionally reinforced concrete reservoir should be completely buried for an equivalent comparison to a prestressed concrete reservoir. Due to inherent design advantages of a prestressed concrete reservoir (core wall is continuously kept in compression), this type of reservoir can be fully exposed, partially buried, or completely buried with no change in performance. Advantages of buried reservoirs include:
a. Temperature conditions are stabilized. The thermal environment created by burial is beneficial to a longer structure life.
b. Expansion and contraction problems are minimized. Less leakage should be expected. c. Removing the roof and walls from exposure to direct sunlight improves the life of the structure.
d. Leakage that might occur is not visible (out of sight, out of mind). e. Security is improved.
f. Chlorine residual will likely last longer due to more stable temperature conditions.

7. The region wide datum change that has occurred since 1962 should be watched carefully.

It is critically important that we clarify where we are in the real world at the start, with an entire new survey at the outset. All elevations must be confirmed with an accurate land survey, not by simply referencing a historical document.

8. Before a reservoir is taken out of service for rehabilitation work, scenarios should be discussed with the City’s operations staff including "what if" failure and recovery plans, to try to foresee any potential problems, and try to uncover unintended consequences.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 566 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
50 9. The best solution is almost never the lowest cost solution. Reservoir projects are civil engineering projects at their finest, with hydraulics being the primary and most critical problem to be solved. Structural engineering is just a discipline, not the project.

The Advantage of Circular Concrete Reservoirs
Nearly 69% of the City’s storage resides in rectangular or square reinforced concrete (RC) reservoirs. The beauty of the design of RC reservoirs is that because no special forms were needed, they could be partially or completely buried,
making them relatively economical; providing significant cost/gallon savings over other reservoir types, such as steel. Wall height was typically kept to a maximum of 22- feet, to keep wall thickness within reason, and columns were spaced every 20- to 25-feet. A center dividing wall with a height of 10-14 feet was a common design feature in larger tanks to create two storage compartments,
allowing for flexible operation during routine maintenance.

As shown on the Chart to the left; non-circular shapes with a wall height of either 25 feet or higher, or a storage capacity greater than 50 acre-feet (16 MG), falls within their jurisdiction size.

Even though all of the City’s RC reservoirs have exposed roofs, the more common and current RC reservoir roofs
were typically buried in two feet of soil; sloping in one direction for drainage (crown at the ridge line). For the same reason, the floor would slope in the other direction to the outlet pipe. The result was that every column from row-to-row was a different height, creating erection and quality challenges for the contractor. Columns were heavily reinforced to carry soil and live loads on the roof. If not properly supported with spacers (i.e., “dobies”), the reinforcement cage could be displaced during the placement of concrete down the cage. Floor and roof slabs were placed in a “checkerboard” fashion, with alternating pours. Walls were placed in a non-consecutive fashion, a single wall would be erected, leaving spacing between walls, which would be filled in after a 7- day curing period. Corners were placed last. The primary objective was to minimize shrinkage and resulting cracking of the concrete. The concrete mix design was carefully specified to these issues; sand content was limited to 41%; water addition was tightly controlled; and 28- day shrinkage was limited to 0.042%.

By the very nature of the material, over time many RC tanks experienced problems with cracking and chloride corrosion of the reinforcing steel. Concrete in a conventionally reinforced tank wall is allowed to develop tension. Concrete in a circular or rectangular conventionally reinforced tank wall will be placed into tension under hydrostatic, hydro-dynamic, and thermal conditions.

Concrete experiencing high levels of tension can result in the yielding of steel reinforcement, cracking of concrete, and subsequent leakage. Cracking can also provide an easy avenue for the Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 567 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
51 intrusion of salts, which can further corrode steel reinforcement. This corrosion creates expansion of the reinforcing which creates further tension in the concrete cover, possibly leading to delamination of concrete from areas of the tank wall. RC tanks were often buried for a reason – out of sight, out of mind. Significant leakage has even been known to occur during the initial hydrostatic test. Besides these structural issues; age of water, poor circulation, and loss of chlorine residual are other common problems of RC reservoir designs.

In prestressed concrete reservoirs, the balance in determining the optimum geometry is wall height to diameter ratio. Slabs on grade are the easiest and least expensive; however, maximizing diameter to provide a high slab on grade construction effort is offset by the most expensive element in tank construction – the roof and supporting column structure. For conventional concrete reservoir designs, the most cost-effective wall should not exceed 22 feet in height to keep wall thicknesses and reinforcing steel requirements within reason. For prestressed concrete designs, 30 feet is the historical water elevation. However, improvements to prestressing technologies over the past 30 years, heights of 40 feet and above have been economically achieved. This has allowed for diameters to be reduced and expensive roof areas to be minimized.

Reservoir Types and Shapes
For reservoir shapes, three reservoir design types are available for consideration:

1. Prestressed concrete (PC);

2. Conventional concrete, circular or rectangular (RC);

3. Steel.

For reservoirs less than 1 MG, steel is the traditional choice, primarily because of the lower cost and because reservoirs in this volume range are considered less critical to uninterrupted operations. For sizes 1-5 MG, circular prestressed concrete and rectangular conventionally reinforced concrete remain the traditional choices. Non-circular shapes are not considered to be cost effective to design or construct in sizes less than 5 MG, and ideally require complete burial.

The variable loading conditions that directly result due to the non-circumferential loadings can cause excessive cracking and leakage to occur, particularly in designs that are exposed to natural sunlight. For reservoirs larger than 5 MG, concrete is the traditional choice.

Steel. For reservoirs larger than 1 MG, a steel tank option can be easily dismissed at the initial stage of evaluation for numerous reasons. A steel tank should not be considered if the tank cannot be constructed at grade; partial burial of a steel tank is not recommended. Additionally, for reservoirs critical to the City’s water operation, tank types that will require future removal from service for an extended duration to allow re-painting of the interior, may not meet the City’s operational needs. It should be expected that a steel tank will need interior re-painting/recoating at least every 12-15 years, and a period of at least six months should be anticipated for this activity for larger size tanks. To further aggravate the problem with steel, strict seasonal Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 568 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
52 requirements for steel tank coating system applications coincide with the peak demand summer months when a water tank is needed most. With the ever-increasing regulations regarding water and air quality, the potential for more stringent steel tank painting regulations is significant. Due to the inevitable stricter environmental regulations to contain and recollect abrasive blast material and removed coatings, it may be necessary to include tank “shrouding” in future maintenance costs. In sizes above 1 MG, a steel tank option would be an extremely poor choice.

Concrete. With regards to concrete, either rectangular conventional or prestressed concrete can be considered. Prestressed concrete reservoirs are typically constructed in the 30-35 feet wall height range but are also very economical for any water depth/wall height.

A circular prestressed concrete tank is an extremely efficient system to hold water. For a given water depth, a circular tank requires the least wall area of any shape to contain the desired capacity. A circular prestressed tank wall has the corewall in pure axial compression and the prestressing steel in pure axial tension, thereby utilizing 100 percent of both materials in their most efficient state of stress.

Rectangular versus Round. Both prestressed concrete and rectangular conventionally reinforced tanks use concrete as their primary component. However, there are vast differences in performance between the two alternatives.

The most obvious, and most significant, difference between the two types of tanks is that the concrete is allowed to go into tension in one type and continuously kept in compression in the other. A properly designed prestressed tank will have its corewall held in compression, not only under hydrostatic loading, but under thermal and seismic loadings as well. In contrast, the concrete in a rectangular conventionally reinforced tank will be placed into tension under these same conditions. Under hydrostatic, thermal, and seismic loads, reinforced concrete walls are put into a state of tension, which can result in yielding of steel reinforcement, cracking of concrete and subsequent leakage. Cracking can also provide an easy avenue for the intrusion of salts, which can corrode the steel reinforcement. Unfortunately, reinforced concrete under large liquid pressure loads behaves chaotically due to the large amount of tension in the concrete.

Reinforced concrete in this condition frequently cracks even when designed to current Codes.

Even if concrete and reinforcement tensile stresses are kept low and steel reinforcement is closely spaced to minimize cracking, over long periods of time the small cracks that do develop will tend to migrate toward one another. This will take place when localized bond failures occurring along the reinforcing bars result in larger, potentially troublesome cracks.

In a rectangular conventionally reinforced concrete tank, hydrostatic loads are not resisted by uniform hoop stress, as they are in a circular prestressed concrete tank. Instead, the water must be held back by a retaining wall cantilevered off the floor. Although fixed connections between the wall and wall footing can save cost, this cantilevered wall produces large moments in the floor and wall, which promotes subsequent cracking and leakage. Since it is very difficult to fully resist the water load just by a cantilever from the floor, the wall is often also tied to the roof so Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 569 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
53 it is fixed at its base and top. Although this helps the wall carry the water load, it can also promote significant problems in the roof when subjected to thermal expansion.

A major place of concern is caused by the stress concentrations that occur at the sharp corners of the tank, which are extremely difficult to accurately analyze and design for. This is one reason why you normally see pressure vessels for gas and other liquids follow the form of a circle, not a square. All these stress concentrations and moment conditions that produce tension can ultimately result in leakage. In the United States, the vast majority of large concrete tanks are built as circular prestressed concrete. In fact, in this country, it is very uncommon for large conventionally reinforced concrete tanks to be built above grade. History has shown that the allowable leakage loss rate can equal the full capacity of the tank each year.

Even though circular prestressed concrete tanks could receive short term cost benefits by using rigid connections, a Type 1 prestressed concrete tank design incorporates free connections at the base and top of the wall. Even with free moving connections, tank walls are still subject to some circumferential and vertical bending moments, caused by differential temperature and differential dryness conditions between the inside and outside of the wall. To counteract these effects, circular prestressed concrete design adds vertical prestressing plus circumferential prestressing above and beyond that required for the hydrostatic loads. This keeps the concrete crack-free in both the vertical and circumferential directions, unlike a conventionally reinforced concrete tank.

Most Type 1 prestressed concrete tank designs use a floor with a slight upward cone shape that promotes drainage and will actually help keep the floor in compression. In comparison, many rectangular conventionally reinforced concrete tanks use hopper floors or sloped floors, which are prone to cracking and leakage.

Constructability
Placement of RC Tank Walls:

A RC tank wall will require two or three curtains of reinforcement steel in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Because of this reinforcing steel congestion, contractors typically pour the RC tank walls by dropping and vibrating the concrete from the top of the wall. Besides losing the advantage of being able to visually inspect the concrete placement (which is possible in the PC tank walls), the dropping of concrete from the top of the wall can result in concrete segregation and inadequate consolidation. Hollow areas and voids that may develop at the bottom of the wall, which is the most critical area of the tank, can result in subsequent leakage.

RC tanks must have the slabs poured in a checkerboard fashion to manage shrinkage. Placements are scheduled one week apart to allow 7-day shrinkage, typically equal to 50% of 28-day shrinkage. It would not be practical to wait four weeks between placements.

Placement of PC Tank Walls:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 570 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
54 A Type I PC tank wall typically has a low abundance of steel in the corewall, since circumferential prestressing is added after the wall has been poured. The concrete for PC tank walls is normally placed through pouring openings in the side of the wall forms, thereby allowing the contractor to properly vibrate and place it. Visual inspection of the concrete placement and consolidation is possible through the wall form openings. A denser, homogeneous corewall should result due to these measures.

Unlike Rectangular Conventionally Reinforced Concrete Tanks, Circular Prestressed Concrete Tanks:

Are designed under a comprehensive national tank code.

Allow for the design of seismic and thermal loadings.

Use galvanized material for their principal horizontal reinforcement.

Incorporate flexible wall-to-base and wall-to-roof connections by using neoprene pads.

Incorporate seismic cables between the wall-to-base and the wall-to-roof.

Incorporate waterstops in all floor, wall, and roof joints.

Use low-chloride concrete to prevent corrosion of the reinforcing steel.

Use exterior wall coatings to prevent the intrusion of salts into the concrete.

Use exterior roof membranes to counteract thermal cracking in the roof.

Do not require coating of internal concrete surfaces.

SUMMARY OF BENEFITS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TANKS:

In the United States, the vast majority of concrete tanks built today are circular prestressed concrete. Conventionally reinforced tanks, whether or not they are rectangular or circular, and whether or not they are above or below ground, are not normally the first choice of municipalities. Therefore, for critically important reservoirs, prestressed concrete is by far the premium choice for the following reasons.

Enhanced operational and seismic performance as roof and footings do not have fixed connections. Floor to wall and wall to roof are designed utilizing an “anchored flexible base.” This allows for all three components of the tank structure to move independently of each other.

Fewer joints in floor slabs, walls, and roofs for less potential of leakage.

Walls are virtually crack-free, since they are in compression both vertically and horizontally. This provides less likelihood of leakage and corrosion of steel reinforcing.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 571 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
55 Significantly improved wall pouring capabilities. Conventionally cast-in-place concrete tanks typically have significant amounts of reinforcing in the walls. With standard forms for conventional cast-in-place tanks, pours are commonly required from the top of the form. This poses a significant challenge to properly consolidating the full height of a potentially 20’ to 30’ tall wall with congested reinforcing steel. These challenges have a high likelihood of reducing the quality of the wall. With reduced need for mild reinforcing in a prestressed concrete tank wall, pour windows can be easily utilized, which greatly enhances the final product.

Prestressed concrete tank walls are in bi-axial permanent compression. Tanks are designed to be in 200 psi residual compression, ensuring a long-lasting leak free wall.

Prestressed concrete tanks have excellent performance with temperature and dryness stress variations. As the wall to roof also utilizes an anchored flexible connection, the slab is free to expand and contract with the thermal variations. This is opposed to a conventionally reinforced concrete tank where thermal loads in the roof can induce bending moments when rigidly connected.

Circular prestressed concrete tanks provide enhanced water quality. The circular shape provides for natural and efficient turnover of water in the tank with no dead spots. This is opposed to square or rectangular concrete tanks which can have “dead zones” towards the corners of the tank, creating a significant water quality issue and promoting bacteria growth.

Prestressed concrete tanks allow for efficient construction operations, with concurrent construction of floor, wall, roof and columns. This results in an optimized construction schedule, often significantly decreasing durations as compared to a reinforced concrete tank.

Life Cycle Costs
Prestressed concrete is the lowest life cycle alternative. Though the initial cost of a steel tank is traditionally lower, over the 50-year span of a steel tank’s useful life, it will require periodic replacement of the interior and exterior coating systems. For example, though the initial cost of the steel tank is only $3.6 million, when considering life cycle costs associated with maintaining the steel option over 100 years (the expected life of a prestressed concrete tank), the cost of steel is nearly $10 million. The cost for prestressed concrete is less than half this amount.

Constructing a circular prestressed concrete reservoir will provide reliable storage with minimal maintenance for the next 75-100 years.

Operations and Maintenance Issues
Concrete is superior to steel with respect to operations and maintenance issues. Considerably less downtime for maintenance is needed (one day per year). Concrete does not require any Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 572 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
56 protective coatings when used for storing potable water. Steel requires regular maintenance, attention to interior and exterior coatings, and cathodic protection systems. These traditional coatings have fallen out of favor in many parts of the United States due to the potential health and taste problems sometimes attributed to volatile organic compounds leaching out of the coatings and into the water.

Seismic Risk Assessment
Prestressed concrete design is by far the better choice for seismic Zone considerations. The footings, walls, and roof of a prestressed concrete tank are not adjoined with fixed connections.

This allows for all three components of the tank structure to move independently of each other, should an earthquake occur. The wall sections sit on neoprene bearing pads and are secured to the footing with seismic cables. In the event of an earthquake, the wall may undergo limited displacement in any direction and return to its original location regardless of the horizontal and vertical force accelerations. This would not be the case for a steel tank design that uses fixed connections. Prestressed concrete is also more resilient against wildfires and errant gun fire compared to steel.

An important component to consider for reservoirs located in seismically active zones is their capacity to absorb energy and to sustain cyclic loading during a seismic event. The design of prestressed concrete tanks takes into consideration horizontal and vertical ground accelerations, the sloshing of the water, and the overturning moments. With the majority of new generation prestressed concreted tanks located in the Western United States in areas of high seismic activity, Type 1 prestressed designs have not experienced earthquake-induced problems in the past 50 plus years. During both the 1971 San Fernando and the 1994 Northridge earthquakes, there were numerous Type 1 tanks located in close proximity to the respective epicenters. None of these tanks exhibited any major structural damage.

Possibly the most dramatic test of a Type 1 prestressed tank was a 10 MG, 40-foot-tall tank located within a couple miles of the epicenter of the Northridge earthquake. This tank is completely above ground and was full at the time of the earthquake. In addition to this tank, there were approximately two dozen Type 1 tanks within a 20-mile radius of the epicenter that performed excellently. In contrast, many steel tanks were severely damaged. The typical problem experienced was the buckling of the steel tank walls. More than twenty steel tanks were damaged in this natural disaster.

Reliability
Prestressed concrete offers the most reliable design. As noted in this report, the prestressed concrete reservoir design is the superior choice for seismic considerations. Since no coatings are required, the time required for operations and maintenance activities are considerably reduced.

Prestressed concrete is a proven design for Seismic Zone 4 in California.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 573 of 728
City of Redlands 2022
57 In summary, a prestressed concrete reservoir is considered “Best Value” for the following reasons:

Prestressed concrete requires minimal maintenance over the 100-year expected life cycle of the reservoir.

Prestressed concrete is superior for seismic conditions and is considerably less susceptible to earthquake damage.

Prestressed concrete can be fully or partially buried, thereby reducing earthwork requirements, while minimizing environmental impacts.

Prestressed concrete provides superior reliability compared to all other options.

Overall, the City has a well-connected water delivery system operated by a knowledgeable and dedicated operations team. System seismic vulnerabilities are primarily entirely due to the age of the City’s water infrastructure assets, not because of neglect or poor attention to proactive maintenance. We have very much enjoyed this extremely challenging engineering engagement that would not have come together without the assistance and support of City engineering and operations staff.

THE END
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 574 of 728
City of Redlands
2022 Water Systems Master Plan
12 REFERENCES
AAWA Distribution Systems. (2008). M31 Distribution System Requirements for Fire Protection, Fourth Edition
AAWA Distribution Systems. (2013). M42 Steel Water Storage Tanks, Revised Edition AAWA Distribution Systems. (2014). M22 Sizing Water Service Lines and Meters, Third Edition California State Water Resource Control Board. Table 1: Typical Equipment Life Expectancy.

California Department of Water Resources. (2004). Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, Bunker Hill Subbasin.

California Department of Water Resources. (2004). Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, Yucaipa Hill Subbasin.

California Office of Administrative Law. (2018). Code of Regulations Title 22 – Division 4 Chapter 3.

California State Water Resource Control Board. (2018). Maximum Contaminant Levels and Regulatory Dates for Drinking Water U.S. EPA vs. California.

The City of Redlands. (2017). City of Redlands General Plan 2035.

The City of Redlands. (2020). City Owned Citrus Groves
The City of Redlands. (2021). Fire Code Table, Fire Flow Requirements Table.

The City of Redlands. (2021). Consumer Confidence Report.

The City of Redlands. (2021). City of Redlands Draft Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

The City of Redlands. (2021). 2020 IRUWMP Part 2 Chapter 4 Redlands 2020 UWMP.

Eastern Municipal Water District. (2007). Water System Planning & Design.

Environmental Finance Center New Mexico Tech. (2006). Asset Management: A Guide for Water and Wastewater Systems.

MASC. (2016). Life Expectancy of Water Distribution Lines.

U.S. EPA. (2002) Effect of Water Age on Distribution System Water Quality.

Western Municipal Water District. (2011). Design Criteria for Water Distribution Systems.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 575 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 576 of 728
City Council Meeting J. 19.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 8420 authorizing the submittal of a grant application to the California Department of Water Resources for the 2022 Urban Community Drought Relief Funding Program
requesting supplemental funding for the engineering and replacement of the Sunset Reservoir (Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Harris)
MOTION(S):

If City Council determines the staff recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 8420.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 8420.

DISCUSSION:

To ensure compliance with the California State Water Resources Control Board 2021 mandate for utility providers to assess and evaluate the condition, ability to resist seismic failure, and structural security of water infrastructure, the City employed Brady & Associates to perform the assessment and evaluation of the City's water facilities in 2022. The assessment findings included recommendations for rehabilitating and/or replacing facilities that are subject to catastrophic failure during a seismic event and analyzed opportunities to improve drought resiliency by increasing storage capacity. The highest priority project recommendation is the replacement and expansion of the 3 MG Sunset Reservoir. This riveted steel reservoir was originally constructed in 1967 and the height-to-width ratio (tall and slender) along with the lack of any seismic restraint system makes complete failure during a local seismic event likely. This reservoir is located at one of the highest elevations within the City and provides critical Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 577 of 728
is located at one of the highest elevations within the City and provides critical water storage for a large portion of the City. The City is currently negotiating with owners of an adjacent undeveloped property to purchase the property for the construction of a new, larger reservoir.

Recently, the California Department of Water Resources issued a notice of funding availability through its 2022 Urban Community Drought Relief Program.

The Program will provide as much as $300M for eligible projects that will improve drought resiliency within urban communities. Staff has determined that the Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project meets the criteria for this grant program, and proposes submitting a grant application for engineering, permitting, and construction supplemental funding. The total project cost is estimated to be $24M. The proposed grant application requests $16,050,000 in Program funding. If approved, the City will provide $7,950,000 in matching project funds.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may deny the staff recommendation.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Strategic Plan Priority D (3) - Develop and implement Water and Wastewater Utility Master Plans to ensure facilities are improved and maintained to meet the needs of our expanding community.

SUBMITTED BY:

John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Maira Durazo, Grants Coordinator
PREPARED BY:

John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 578 of 728
Fiscal Impact
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact associated with approval of this Resolution.

Attachments
Resolution No. 8420
Self-Certification Form
Grant Budget
Grant Schedule
Grant Wholesaler Summary Sheet
Underrepresented Communities Sheet
Project Location Map
Underrepresented Community Benefits
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 579 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8420 Drought Relief Grant.docx
RESOLUTION NO. 8420

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS,

CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN DROUGHT 2022 GRANT FOR THE CITY OF REDLANDS

SUNSET RESERVOIR REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS The City of Redlands proposes to implement the Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS The City of Redlands has the legal authority and is authorized to enter into a funding agreement with the State of California; and
WHEREAS The City of Redlands intends to apply for grant funding from the California Department of Water Resources for the Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. That pursuant and subject to all of the terms and provisions of Budget Act of 2021 (Stats. 2021, ch. 240, § 80), the City of Redlands Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director, or designee is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and file an application for funding with the Department of Water Resources and take such other actions necessary or appropriate to obtain grant funding.

Section 3. The City of Redlands Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director or designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute the funding agreement with the Department of Water Resources and any amendments thereto.

Section 4. The City of Redlands Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director or designee is hereby authorized and directed to submit any required documents, invoices, and reports required to obtain grant funding.

Section 5. If a grant award is made by the California Department of Water Resources, the City commits to providing up to 25% in matching funds for the City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project plus any remaining balance noted in the funding plan.

Section 6. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Agreement, and that the NOFO and Application will be incorporated in the Agreement by reference and made a part thereof. Any and all activities, expenditures, Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 580 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8420 Drought Relief Grant.docx
information, and timelines represented in the Application are enforceable through the Agreement. Funds are to be used for the allowable expenditures and activities identified in the Agreement.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 2022.

Paul T. Barich, Mayor
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 581 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8420 Drought Relief Grant.docx
ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 582 of 728
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
P a g e 1
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
As an applicant with the Department of Water Resources’ (DWRs) Financial Assistance Branch, you must complete this self-certification form as a condition to enter into a Grant Agreement with DWR to receive grant funds. This form should be filled out for the applicant and each Local Project Sponsor. Failure to meet and continue to comply with these conditions and requirements may result in DWR revoking the grant award, withholding grant funding, stopping invoice payment, and/or terminating the Grant Agreement. An answer of “No” to certain questions below may make you ineligible to enter into an agreement with DWR. If any question is going to be answered as “No” please contact DWR at [email protected].

1. Applicant Eligibility
Applicant Name: City of Redlands
Applicant Entity Type: Municipality
If the Applicant or any Local Project Sponsor is a mutual water company or public utility, does their proposed project have a clear and definite public purpose that benefits the customers of the water system or other public utility and not the investors?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, please state the public purpose and explain how it benefits the customers:

This project proposes to engineer and construct a new 10 MG potable water reservoir to replace an existing 3 MG riveted steel reservoir constructed in 1967.

The condition of the existing reservoir was assessed by Brady & Associates in 2021 and was determined to be at risk of catastrophic failure during a significant local seismic event. Construction of a larger concrete reservoir will ensure continuity of services to the Redlands water utility customers during and after future seismic events and will reduce future drought impacts by allowing the City to increase storage during higher precipitation periods.

Applicant/Local Project Sponsor Name Applicant/Local Project Sponsor Entity Type
City of Redlands Municipality
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 583 of 728
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
P a g e 2

2. Authorizing Resolution
A resolution adopted by the applicant’s governing body authorizing the application for a grant under this program that designates a representative to sign the application, and in the event of an award of grant funds, a representative to execute the funding agreement and all necessary documentation (e.g., invoices, progress reports, etc.) is required. A signed, certified resolution must be received prior to the execution of a grant agreement with the State.

Is the authorizing resolution complete and included with the application? If there is not a resolution included at time of application, please provide an estimate for when it will be complete.

On December 20, 2022, the Redlands City Council adopted Resolution No. XXXX authorizing the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director to submit all required grant application documents on behalf of the City.

3. Urban Water Management Compliance
List the urban water suppliers (UWS), as defined by Water Code section 10617, that will receive funding if the application is awarded funds. Does each UWS have a current Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) verified by DWR that addresses the requirements of the California Water Code? Each UWS must also have a complete and validated water loss audit report verified by DWR in accordance with Senate Bill (SB) No. 555 (Stats. 2015, ch. 679). Additionally, each UWS proposing wastewater projects, water use efficiency projects, or drinking water projects must be compliant with the water metering requirements contained in Water Code section 525 et seq.

Urban Water Supplier Date UWMP verified by DWR
City of Redlands July 13, 2022
Are all Urban Water Suppliers compliant with all requirements for Urban Water Suppliers including but not limited to metering requirements (Water Code, § 525 et seq.), water loss audits, and monthly reporting to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If a supplier isn’t compliant with the requirements, please explain:

N/A
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 584 of 728
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
P a g e 3

4. Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP)
Each Urban Water Supplier that will receive funding if the application is awarded funds must have a current Water Shortage Contingency Plan activated to a Stage 2 or equivalent in compliance with the SWRCB’s Emergency Water Conservation Regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 23, §§ 995-996) and any amendments thereto.

DWR will verify compliance for retailers. For wholesalers, the Water Shortage Contingency Plan stage will be determined by looking at the activation stages of their individual suppliers. Please fill out a Wholesaler summary form for each wholesaler in the application and attach it to the application.

5. Agricultural Water Management and Measurement Compliance List the agricultural water suppliers, as defined by Water Code section 10608.12(a), that will receive funding if the application is awarded funds. If there are none, please indicate so. Each supplier must have a completed Agricultural Water Management Plan (AWMP) that has been verified by DWR. If the supplier provides less than 25,000 irrigated acres, they will be exempt from the AWMP requirement.

Agricultural Water Supplier Date AWMP verified by DWR, or exempt
NONE
Are all Agricultural Water Suppliers compliant with all other requirements of an Agricultural Water Supplier including but not limited to farm gate delivery reports, Efficient Water Management Practices, Water Measurement regulations, etc.? Yes ☐ No ☐
If a supplier isn’t compliant with the requirements, please explain:

N/A
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 585 of 728
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
P a g e 4

6. Surface Water Diverter Compliance
List the surface water diverters that will receive funding if the application is awarded funds. If there are none, please indicate so. For the listed surface water diverters, state whether each diverter has submitted their latest annual and monthly surface water diversion reports in compliance with requirements outlined in Water Code section 5100 et seq., and their Use Reports as set forth in the California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 907 et seq., to the SWRCB.

Surface Water Diverter Has Surface Water Diverter
submitted all required reports to
SWRCB to remain up to date?
(Yes/No)
NONE

7. Groundwater Management Compliance
List any projects that directly affect groundwater levels or quality. Please attach a support letter from the appropriate Groundwater Sustainability Agency for any projects affecting groundwater in high or medium basins. For adjudicated basins, please submit a support letter from the watermaster. You can find your groundwater basin and the priority by going to the following link:
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=SGMADataViewer#gwlevels%C2%A0 Project Name Grantee/Local Project
Sponsor
Groundwater Basin Priority of the basin
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 586 of 728
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
P a g e 5

8. Groundwater Management Compliance Self-Certification Groundwater Management Compliance: The Applicant and any Local Project Sponsors must maintain continuing eligibility with the current Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA, Water Code, § 10720 et seq.) requirements as they come into effect.

X Yes, the Applicant and Local Project Sponsors agree to maintain continuing eligibility with the most current SGMA requirements, as applicable. ☐ No, the Applicant and Local Project Sponsors do not agree to maintain continuing eligibility with the most current SGMA requirements, as applicable. DWR cannot enter into a Grant Agreement.

9. California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Compliance Please fill out the following table for any projects located in a high or medium priority groundwater basin as identified by the CASGEM program. Projects in high and medium priority groundwater basins that do not have a CASGEM monitoring entity will not be eligible for funding if the grant applicant and Local Project Sponsor are listed as potential monitoring entities in Water Code section 10927. The same applies to counties whose jurisdictions include unmonitored high and medium priority groundwater basins (Water Code, § 10933.7(a)).

Project Basin Monitoring Entity If there is no monitoring entity, is the Local Project Sponsor is an
eligible monitoring entity per Water
Code section 10928?
N/A

10. Stormwater Projects
If a project is a stormwater and/or dry weather runoff capture project, is it included in a Stormwater Resource Plan or functionally equivalent plan (FEP) if applicable? Projects that benefit a DAC with a population of 20,000 or less are exempt from this requirement.

However, they must not be a co-permittee for a municipal separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued to a municipality with a population greater than 20,000 (Water Code, § 10563(c)(2)(B)).

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 587 of 728
Eligibility Criteria Self-Certification Form
P a g e 6
Project (only list stormwater and/or
dry weather runoff capture projects)
Project Included in a Stormwater
Resource Plan or FEP?
N/A

11. Agreement Template
Have you and your counsel reviewed the agreement template and all terms and conditions?
Yes ☒ No ☐
I understand that the Department of Water Resources will rely on this signed certification in order to approve funding and that false and/or inaccurate representations in this Self-Certification may result in revocation of the award of funds or loss of all funds awarded to the Grantee. and that reimbursement of any grant funds is reliant upon the Grantee and all local project sponsors to meet and maintain all eligibility requirements outlined within this SelfCertification form, the 2022 Urban Community Drought Relief Program Guideline and Proposal Solicitation Package, and the Grant Agreement terms and conditions. Additionally, for the aforementioned reasons, the Department of Water Resources may withhold disbursement of grant funds and/or pursue any other applicable legal remedies
John R. Harris Signature
Municipal Utilities & Engineering Director,
City of Redlands
Date
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 588 of 728
Attachment 3 - Budget Form
Each applicant must complete and submit a Budget attachment for the projects in their proposal. The Budget attachment must be submitted in the original word format with the forms intact. Please enter whole numbers for each budget.

AGREEMENT BUDGET SUMMARY
PROJECTS Grant
Amount
Non
State
Cost
Share
All
Oth
er
Cost
Total
Cost
Grant Administration $ $ $ $
1 Project 1: <Title> $ $ $ $
X Project X: <Title> $ $ $ $
GRAND
TOTAL $ $ $ $
Instructions: If requesting Grant Administration costs, complete the following table.

Grant Administration is the Grantee’s cost for meeting the requirements associated with the administering of the grant funds, including coordinating with project managers for implementing the grant projects, and combining reports and invoices to submit to DWR.

This is independent of Project Administration and is not the same or a sum of the Project Administration amounts. Applicants are not required to include a Grant Administration project, and may not want to, if only requesting funds for a single project.

Please enter whole numbers for each budget box.

Grant Administration
BUDGET
CATEGORY Grant
Amount
Non
State
Cost
Share
All Other
Cost
Total Cost
(a
)
Grant Administration $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 589 of 728
Attachment 3 - Budget Form
Instructions: Please complete the following budget table for each project. All Other Costs should total the remaining costs of implementing the project beyond the grant amount and non state cost share. If you are submitting an application for more than one project, please copy additional tables below.

PROJECT: Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project
Implementing Agency: City of Redlands
BUDGET
CATEGORY Grant
Amount
Non State
Cost
Share*
All
Oth
er
Co
st*
Total Cost
(a) Project
Administration
$0 $0 $0 $0
(b) Land Purchase /
Easement
$0 $0 $0 $0
(c) Planning / Design
/ Engineering /
Environmental
Documentation
$1,750,000 $750,000 $0 $2,500,000
(d) Construction /
Implementation
$14,300,000 $7,200,000 $0 $21,500,000
TOTAL COSTS $16,050,000 7,950,000 0 24,000,000
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 590 of 728
Attachment 4 - Schedule Form
Each applicant must complete and submit a Schedule attachment for the projects in their proposal. The attachment must be submitted in the original word format with the forms intact. Please complete the schedule below for the project(s). Applications with multiple projects will complete a schedule for each project. Projects must be complete by December 31, 2026 including all reporting and retention, to allow time for final invoice processing and retention payment before the State funds expire on June 30, 2027. Project/grant administration should end at least three months after construction.

Dates should be entered at M/D/YYYY.

Grant Administration
BUDGET CATEGORY Start Date End Date
a Project Administration 1/4/2024 6/1/2026
PROJECT: Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project
BUDGET CATEGORY Start Date End Date
a Project Administration 1/4/2024 6/1/2026
b Land Purchase / Easement 10/1/2022 5/1/2023
c Planning / Design / Engineering / Environmental
Documentation 2/1/2024 12/31/2024
d Construction / Implementation 3/1/2025 6/1/2026
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 591 of 728
Attachment 5 Wholesaler Summary
Sheet Form
Please note: If an applicant is an Urban Water Supplier wholesaler and does not submit the Wholesaler Summary Sheet, they will not be considered for award under Priority 2.

Wholesaler Agency:

Retail Agency Name Percentage of wholesaler
supply by each retail
agency
N/A
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 592 of 728
1 Appendix H – Underrepresented Communities
For the purposes of this GL/PSP, Disadvantaged Communities (DACs), SDACs (Severely Disadvantaged Communities), EDAs (Economically Distressed Area), Tribes, Environmentally Disadvantaged Communities (EnvDACs), and Fringe Communities are collectively referred to as Underrepresented Communities (URCs).

DWR will use the information presented in the applications to evaluate whether the project provides benefits to an Underrepresented Community and to determine whether the project is eligible for the Underrepresented Community Funding. The Underrepresented Community Funding is available to projects providing at least 50% of the primary benefit directly to an Underrepresented Community or Tribe.

Applicants seeking this determination must include in their grant application, supporting documentation that identifies the Project benefit area and location(s) of the Underrepresented Communities, identifies how the proposed Project provides benefits to an Underrepresented Community, and indicates the total project benefits provided.

Underrepresented Community Classifications
Disadvantaged Communities (DACs)
A disadvantaged community (DAC) is a community with an annual median household income (MHI) that is less than 80% of the Statewide annual median household income. Using the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data for the years 2012 -2016, 80% of the California Statewide MHI is $51,026.

Applicants must provide the following information for each project claiming benefits to a DAC(s):
• Percentage of the project benefits provided to a DAC, by geographic area or population. • Information that supports the project benefits a DAC(s), such as a map or shapefile that shows the project benefit area and the location of the DAC(s).
• Where there is a lack of representative census data that adequately represents the community that can be documented, alternative studies (local income surveys, a subset of a block group, older (ACS) data, etc.) may be substituted in the attachment. Include justification for the use of alternate data.

The ACS data gives estimates of MHI for different census geographies, such as states, counties, census places (incorporated cities and unincorporated towns), census tracts, and census block groups.

DWR has developed a tool which utilizes the most current ACS data to show the location and boundaries of DACs and Severely Disadvantaged Communities (SDACs) in the State, at the census place, tract, and block group level. The tool allows users to view different geographies or combinations of geographies, using different base maps and to zoom in to various scales. The DAC tool can be found at the following link:
https://water.ca.gov/Work-With-Us/Grants-And-Loans/mapping-tools. For individuals with Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities, also provided at this link are GIS files representing the ACS data (and DAC status) for the three census geographies.

The applicant may use ACS data at the census place, census tract, or census block group geography levels to show whether a project serves a DAC, based on what geography is the most representative for that community.

For DACs, the allowable alternative geographies are, respectively:

Severely Disadvantaged Communities (SDACs)
A severely disadvantaged community (SDAC) is a community with a median household income of less than 60% of the Statewide average.

Applicants must provide the following information for each project claiming benefits to a SDAC(s):
• Percentage of the project benefits provided to an SDAC, by geographic area or population. • Information that supports the project benefits an SDAC(s), such as a map or shapefile that shows the project benefit area and the location of the SDAC(s).

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 593 of 728
2 If a project is serving a DAC or SDAC, is divided among several contiguous census tracts or block groups and some of the project area tracts or block groups do not meet the DAC or SDAC criterion, then the project will be considered a DAC project for the purpose of waiving cost share requirements in proportion to the population served that meets the DAC criterion. The DAC tool described in the previous section can also be used to identify SDAC locations in California.

Economically Distressed Areas (EDAs)
An economically distressed area (EDA) is a municipality with a population of 20,000 persons or less, a rural county, or a reasonably isolated and divisible segment of a larger municipality where the segment of the population is 20,000 persons or less, with an annual median household income that is less than 85% of the Statewide median household income, and with one or more of the following conditions as determined by the DWR: (1) financial hardship, (2) Unemployment rate at least 2% higher than the Statewide average, or (3) low population density.

Applicants must provide the following information for each project claiming benefits to an EDA(s):
• Percentage of the project benefits provided to an EDA, by geographic area or population. • Include information that supports the project benefits an EDA(s), such as a map or shapefile that shows the project benefit area and the location of the EDA(s). • Where the lack of representative census data that adequately represents the community can be documented, alternative studies (local income surveys, a subset of a block group, etc.) may be substituted in the attachment.
• In determining the MHI for EDAs, applicants may use a single type of census geography or combinations of census geographies that best represent the EDA.

The EDA Mapping Tool is an interactive map that allows users to overlay multiple geographies as separate data layers. Go to https://water.ca.gov/Work-With-Us/Grants-And-Loans/mapping-tools to access the EDA mapping tool.

Environmentally Disadvantaged Communities (EnvDACs)
The California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) designates the top 25% scoring census tracts as DACs. Census tracts that score the highest 5% of Pollution Burden scores, but do not have an overall CalEnviroScreen score because of unreliable socioeconomic or health data, are also designated as DACs (found to be 22 census tracts in the 2021 CalEnviroScreen version 4.0).

CalEPA (through the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)) developed a mapping tool that assesses environmental, health, and socioeconomic indicators to produce a score for each census tract in the State. Each tract receives a Pollution Burden score (Exposures and Environmental Effects) and a Population Characteristics score (Sensitive Populations and Socioeconomic Factors). The average Pollution Burden and Population Characteristics scores are multiplied together to produce an overall CalEnviroScreen score.

There are two tools available to verify if a census tract is considered an EnvDACs:

OPTION 1: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Mapping Tool
The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Mapping Tool is an interactive map that allows users to overlay Census Tracts.

Go to https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 and scroll down to access the CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Mapping Tool.

OPTION 2: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Results Excel Sheet
The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Results Excel Sheet is a sortable spreadsheet that contains all CalEnviroScreen 4.0 scores.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 594 of 728
3 Go to https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 and scroll down to Data and Additional Materials.

Fringe Communities
Fringe Communities are those communities that do not meet the established DAC, SDAC, and EDA definitions, but can show that they score in the top 25% of either the Pollution Burden or Population Characteristics score, using the CalEnviroScreen version 4.0 linked above.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 595 of 728
4 Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 596 of 728

SUNSET RESERVOIR
SITE MAP .

EXISTING

RESERVOIR

3.0 MG

PROPOSED

RESERVOIR
10 MG

PROPOSED

RESERVOIR
10 MG

HELEN CT
030045107
030060101 030060103
029414101
030045124
030060102
030045113
030045125
030045108
030045114

HELEN CT
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 597 of 728
Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project Proposal Underrepresented Community Benefits
1 A disadvantaged community (DAC) is a community with an annual median household income (MHI) that is less than 80% of the Statewide annual median household income. Using the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data for the years 2016 -2020, 80% of the California Statewide MHI of $78,672 is $62,937.

According to the Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) Mapping Tool, five disadvantaged community census tracts are within the City of Redlands affected project area consisting of 6,085 households, making up approximately 26% project benefit. Over 1,100 households within the identified DAC area have a median household income of under $35,000 and the remaining households have a median household income of less than $61,000.

The city’s underserved community share a geographic area of North Redlands that include two HUD designated Qualified Census Tracts (QCT). Communities receive this designation when at least 50% of households have incomes that are less than 60% of the Area Median Gross Income (AGMI) or have a poverty rate of 25% or more. HUD recognized QCTs are eligible to receive a State and local Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) – the most important resource for the creation of affordable housing nationwide. LIHTC is focused on issuing tax credits for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of rental housing for use by lower-income households. The two QCTs that meet this designation will benefit as a direct result of this Project.

The Project will benefit the City’s disadvantaged and underserved community by harnessing more than three (3) times as much stored water for distribution during peak demand periods. This extra storage will increase reliability of future water supplies both during a seismic event and during persistent drought periods. The additional benefits of this project may include possibly minimizing water rate increases that might otherwise be required to mitigate the long-term effects of an emergency situation. Any efforts to avoid water rate increases will have a meaningful impact on disadvantaged and underrepresented communities who may already struggle with making ends meet.

Maps depicting the City’s DAC and QCT project benefit area are included below.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 598 of 728
Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project Proposal Underrepresented Community Benefits
2 Department Of Water Resources Mapping Tool Demonstrating Project Benefits DACs Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 599 of 728
Urban Drought 2022 City of Redlands Sunset Reservoir Replacement Project Proposal Underrepresented Community Benefits
3 City of Redlands HUD Designated Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 600 of 728
City Council Meeting J. 20.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the Additional Services Agreement with the Flock Group, Inc. for the lease of automated license plate recognition cameras in the amount of $69,550 for two years (Deputy Police Chief Martinez) MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to approve the Additional Services Agreement with the Flock Group, Inc. for the lease of automated license plate recognition cameras in the amount of $69,550 for two years.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that Council approve the Additional Services Agreement with the Flock Group, Inc. for the lease of automated license plate recognition cameras in the amount of $69,550 for two years.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Redlands' two year budget that was approved by Council in June 2022 funded the purchase and installation of additional automated license plate recognition cameras (ALPR) around the city. The Redlands Police Department has adopted the strategy of installing ALPRs at various egress points of the City to enhance its crime control measures. The ALPRs have been instrumental in providing crucial leads in numerous crimes including robbery, burglary, and sexual assault.

The automated license plate recognition program is a series of high-speed camera systems that photograph license plates, convert the numbers and letters into machine-readable text, tag them with the time and location, and upload that data into a database for retrieval. This database will then be accessible to all law Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 601 of 728
data into a database for retrieval. This database will then be accessible to all law enforcement agencies in California. Regionally, law enforcement agencies that use ALPR cameras compare plates to a "hot list" of plates suspected of being connected to violent crimes, child abduction, and terrorist activity. Cities throughout San Bernardino County are already participating in ALPR information sharing. The Redlands Police Department has already successfully implemented an ALPR program to include 40 camera systems. This project will allow the City of Redlands to expand the program and contribute more data to the regional ALPR system to assist in solving crimes in the City of Redlands and throughout our region.

The proposed Additional Services Agreement will provide for an additional 13 cameras at locations in the eastern area of the City. The annual cost for each camera is $2,500 with an installation cost of $350 each. The first year cost will be $37,050 and the second year cost will be $32,500 for a total of $69,550.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not approve the agreement
STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Christopher R. Catren, Chief of Police
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Travis Martinez, Deputy Chief of Police
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 602 of 728
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 22/23
Revenue Generating: N
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: $37,050
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Discussion:

The funding for these cameras has already been approved in the FY 22/23 budget.

Fiscal Year: 23/24
Revenue Generating: N
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: $32,500
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Discussion:

The funding for these cameras has already been approved in the FY 23/24 budget.

Attachments
Flock Agreement-Additional Services
Original Flock Agreement
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 603 of 728
FLOCK GROUP INC.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement combined with the existing agreement referenced in Exhibit A describe the relationship between Flock Group Inc. (“Flock”) and the customer identified below (“Customer”) (each of Flock and Customer, a ”Party”). This order form (“Order Form”) hereby incorporates and includes the terms of the previously executed agreement (the “Terms”) which describe and set forth the general legal terms governing the relationship (collectively, the "Agreement" ). The Terms contain, among other things, warranty disclaimers, liability limitations and use limitations.

This additional services Agreement will be effective when this Order Form is executed by both Parties (the “Effective Date”).

Sales tax will be added to all fees as applicable. If your organization is tax exempt, please check this box: \FSTaxExemptCheckbox1\ and email your Sales Tax Exemption Certificate to [email protected].

Agency: CA - Redlands PD
Legal Entity Name: \FSLegalEntityName{r}\
Contact Name: Christopher Catren
Address:

Po Box 3005
Redlands, California 92373
Phone: (909) 798-7681
E-Mail: [email protected]
Expected Payment Method:
\FSExpectedPaymentMethod1\
Billing Contact: \FSBillingContact1\
(if different than above)
Initial Term: 24 months
Renewal Term: 24 months
Billing Term: Annual payment due Net 30 per terms
and conditions
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 604 of 728
Professional Services and One-Time Purchases
Hardware and Software Products
Annual recurring amounts over subscription term
Name Price/Usage Fee QTY Subtotal
Professional Services - Standard Implementation Fee $350.00 13.00 $4,550.00 Name Price/Usage Fee QTY Subtotal
Falcon $2,500.00 13.00 $32,500.00
Subtotal Year 1: $37,050.00
Subscription Term: 24 Months
Annual Recurring Total: $32,500.00
Estimated Sales Tax: $0.00
Total Contract Amount: $69,550.00
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 605 of 728
By executing this Order Form, Agency represents and warrants that it has read and agrees to all of the terms and conditions contained in the Terms attached. The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below.

FLOCK GROUP, INC. Agency: CA - Redlands PD
By: \FSSignature2\ By: \FSSignature1\
Name: \FSFullname2\ Name: \FSFullname1\
Title: \FSTitle2\ Title: \FSTitle1\
Date: \FSDateSigned2\ Date: \FSDateSigned1\
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 606 of 728

EXHIBIT A
This agreement is governed by the terms as set out in this attached agreement that has been previously executed by both parties.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 607 of 728
Sole Source/ Single Source/ Standardization Form
For procui ement of supplies, equipment and services valued at $ 55, 000 and over NOTE. Every question must be answered zi fth appropriate documentation attached; mcompl to foams i -,ill be unmediately rejected by Purchasing Date 09 -? 8- 2'018
T4 Purchasinc, Division
FROM Travis Martinez
Purchase Requisition # 1 !) i i S,
Estimated Total Cost: $ 7500
Proposed Vendor Flock Safety
Request Tern
This farm trust accompany the purchase document whenevei an exception to the competitive process is requested Requests fol goods andloi seivices from a specific vendoi os Iimited to a specific brand whete substitutes to the iecornmended vendor or brand ate unacceptable, must be accompanied by a i- amen Justification explaining the circumstances that make alteinatives unacceptable
The City Managei will determine whethei the Justification is appropriate Requests foi exception must be supported by factual statements that «-ill pass an audit Received

PURCHRSING
AUG 30 2018
jry / lire ldaneg
0 PURCHRSING C%
SEP 04 2018
j
j_' /auto flo uu
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 608 of 728
EXCEPTION TO BIDDING AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 2 Page

INSTRUCTIONS
1 Please check all applicable categories ( a through i) below and provide additional information where indicated
a The requested product is an integral repan part or accessory compatible with existing equipment
Existing Equipment
Manufacturer/ Model Number
Age
Current Estimated Value
b The requested product has unique design/ performance specifications or quality requirements that are not available in comparable products c I have standardized the requested product and the use of another brand/ model would require considerable time and funding to evaluate
d The requested product is one in which I (and/ or my staff) have specialized training and/ or extensive expertise Retraining would incur substantial cost in time and/or funding
e The requested product is used or demonstration equipment available at a lower -than - new cost
f Repair/ Maintenance service is available only from manufacturer or designated service representative
g Upgrade to or enhancement of existing software is available only from manufacturer h Service proposed by vendor is unique, therefore, competitive bids are not available or applicable
i Othei factors ( provide detailed explanation in #2 below) 2 Provide a detailed explanation and pertinent documentation foi each category checked in item l above Attach additional sheets if necessary
Rev 4116f12
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 609 of 728

EXCEPTION TO BIDDING AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Flock Sarety is the: sole manufacturer and developer of the Flock Safety Camera Flock Safety is also the sole provider of the comprehensive monitoring, processing and machine vision services which integrate with the Flock Safety Camera
Description of Cameras
Wireless deployment of license plate reading cameras with integrated solar and cellular networks ( other cameras have to be hard wired to electricity and/ or €nternet) Wireless ALPR camera in total weighing less than 5lbs
On device machine processing to limit LTE bandwidth consumption Covert industrial design for minimizing visual pollution Machine vis€on to analyze vehicle license plate vehicle calor and vehicle make Machine vis€on to detect persons, animals vehicles and other cars Privacy controls to enable certain vehicles to opt -out" of being captured on film Cloud storage of footage
Web based footage retrieval tool with filtering capabilities such as vehicle color partial/full license plate and object detection
Performance monitoring software to predict potential failures, obstructions tilts, and other critical or minor issues
3 Page
3 Was an evaluation of other equipment products, of semices performed' ZYes No
dl res, pleEave explEah, the tty)e of evaluation pe frsamed and provide rill srrppor•tin. rlocr menteation.

A demo camera was installed in the neighboi hood near Cresta leii/ Foi d RPD Staff worl. ed with the c.ompan to m orl. out a couple of bugs RPD Staff is confident the technology can be valuable to RPD' s commune" policing strategy

4. List below the name of each individual ', rho was involved. in the evaluation if conducted and in making the recommendation to procure this product or ser" ice Attach additional information, it necessary
Travis Martinez Anis- Varela
S Explain ii hat •iction( s) the department € t ould take if' tile sole/ single soul ccs sem lees ; 1 ere no hanger available
We would obtain bids frons other companies that manufacture ALPR cameras We have not found anothei company that ma nitactures solar powered ALPR cameras that haN e built in cellulai networks,
I certify that the aboi e inionnation .is accurate to the best of nay knots ledge and a SIgned copti of this document will be Inept on file and available foi audit in ms department w
RL% 4" W12
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 610 of 728

EXCEPTION TO BIDDING AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
s f E
1-, a-, i ' c
A
r Travis Martinez
Date Printed Name
48/ 28/ 2018 08/ 28/ 2018
Department Tame Title
Purchasing Approvals
ATTEST
J& e Donaldson, City Clerk
Rev 4116112
Page
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 611 of 728

SAAS ORDER FORM
Customer Redlands Police Department Contact Travis Martinez Address- 30 Cajon Street
CA 92373
Phone 909- 557- 6583
E
tmartinez@redlandspolice org
Services Flock s software for automatic license plate detection of video recorded by the Flock Gate Cameras ( the Hardware"), searching image records, and a platform for sharing those records with Customer, in the form such software is provided by Flock to Customer (` Service( s)") For clarity, the Services are reliant on use of the Hardware Fees $
7' 500
per
Year
Service Term 12
Number of Cameras
5 The initial term ofthis Agreement shall be 12
months, subject to early termination ( the " Initial Service Term") Following the Initial Service Term this
Agreement will automatically renew for successive
renewal terms of 0 months subject to early
termination ( each, a " Renewal Term', and together with the Initial Term, the ` Service Term") unless either party gives the other party notice of non -renewal at least
ninety ( 90) days prior to the end of the then -current term
Payment Schedule [ Payable thirty ( 30) days in advance Method of Payment ACH or Check of each time period indicated above, subject to the terms of Section 5 herein.]
Implementation Services Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Customer the seances described in the Statement of Work (" SOW") attached as Exhibit A hereto (" Implementation Services"), and Customer shall pay Company the Implementation Fee in accordance with the terms herein Implementation Fee ( one- time) $ 0

SAAS SERVICES AGREEMENT
This SaaS Services Agreement (" Agreement") is entered into on this 30 day of
August 2018 (
the ` Effective
Date") between Flock Group Inc with a place of business at 2588 Winslow Drive Atlanta, GA 30305 ('Company') and the Customer listed above (" Customer' s This Agreement includes and incorporates the above Order Form. as well as the attached Terms and Conditions and contains. among other things, warrantv disclaimers. liabilitv limitations and use limitations. There shall be no force or effect to any different terms of any related purchase order or similar form even if signed by the partes after the date hereof Flock Group Inc Customer Name
2ett to
A
By By/ /_
Name Garrett Langley Name WA -,l WZ
Title
CEO Title hL7" yC _
ATTEST
Ie e Donaldson, City Clerk
GDSVF&. Hk3180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 612 of 728

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
61M", V [" 1MINIMMUZi] 110
1 1 Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Customer the Services The Services include access to a platform for vmewma video footage ( the ` Recordings') The Recordings will be available for Customer to access for 30 days Customer may be required to sign up for an account, and select a password and user name C Company User ID") 12 Subject to the terms hereof Company will provide Customer qth reasonable technical and on site support and maintenance services (" On -Site Services") m -person or by email at hello(, flocksafety com Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to respond to requests for support 1 3 Customer agrees to provide Company with accurate, complete and updated registration information Customer may not select as its Company User ID a name that Customer does not have the right to use, or another person' s name with the intent to impersonate that person Customer may not transfer its account to anyone else without prior written permission Customer will not share its account or password with anyone, and must protect the secunty of its account and password Customer is responsible for any activity associated with its account

RESTRICTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2 1 Customer will not, directly or indirectly reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the source code, object code or underlying structure, ideas, I.mow how or algorithms relevant to the Services, certain software embedded on the Hardware by Company (" Embedded Software'), or any other software or documentation or data related to the Services ( collectively, " Software") ( except that such prohibition shall not apply to the extent applicable law prohibits such restriction), modify, translate, or create derivative works based on the Services, Hardware or any Software ( except to the extent expressly permitted by Company or authorized within the Services), use the Services, Hardware or any Software for tuneshannng or service bureau purposes or otherwise for the benefit of a third party, or remove any proprietary notices or labels
22 Further, Customer may not remove or export from the United States or allow the export or re- export of the Services, Hardware, Software or anything related thereto, or any direct product thereof in violation of any restrictions, laws or regulations of the United States Department of Commerce, the United States Department of Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other United States or foreign agency or authority As defined in FAR section 2 101 the Software and documentation are " commercial items" and according to DFAR section 252 2277014( a)( 1) and ( 5) are deemed to be " commercial computer software" and " commercial computer software documentation" Consistent with DFAR section 227 7202 and FAR section 12 212, any use, modification, reproduction, release, performance, display, or disclosure of such commercial software or commercial software documentation by the U S Government will be governed solely by the terms of this Agreement and will be prohibited except to the extent expressly pernutted by the terms of this Agreement 23 Customer represents covenants and warrants that Customer will use the Services only in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to any laws relating to the recording or sharing of video or audio content. Customer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Company against any damages, losses liabilities settlements and expenses ( including without lmutation costs and attorneys' fees) in connection with any claim or action that arises from an alleged violation ofthe foregoing or otherwise from Customer s use of the Services, Hardware and any Software, including any claim that such actions violate any applicable law or third party right Although Company has no obligation to monitor Customer' s use of the Services, Company may do so and may prohibit any use ofthe Services it believes may be (or alleged to be) in violation of the foregomg
24 Customer shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining any equipment and ancillary services needed to connect to, access or otherwise use the Services References to the " Unit" herein mean Hardware together with Embedded Software, while references to " Hardware" mean such hardware alone, excluding any software or firmware of any kind Customer will not be able to access the Services except through the Unit, and the Umt will no longer function when this Agreement is terminated Upon termination of this Agreement Company will collect all Units
GDSVF' B &\ 3180735 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 613 of 728

CONFIDENTIALI' T' Y, PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
3 1 Each party ( the " RecervmQ Parry") understands that the other party ( the ` Disclosing Parer") has disclosed or may disclose business technical or financial information relating to the Disclosing Party' s business ( hereinafter referred to as ` Proprietary Information" ofthe Disclosing Party) Proprietary Information of Company includes non-public information regarding features, functionality and performance of the Services Proprietary Information of Customer includes non- public data provided by Customer to Company or collected by Company via the Unit, including the Recordings, to enable the provision of the Services, which includes but is not lumted to geo location information and environmental data collected by sensors built into the Units (" Customer Data") The Receiving Party agrees ( i) to tale the same security precautions to protect against disclosure or unauthorized use of such Proprietary Information that the party takes with its ou n proprietary information, but in no event rill a party apply less than reasonable precautions to protect such Proprietary Information, and ( 11) not to use ( except in performance of the Services or as otherwise permitted herein) or divulge to any third person any such Proprietary Information Company' s use of the Proprietary Information may include processing the Proprietary Information to send Customer alerts. such as when a car exits Customers neighborhood, or to analyze the data collected to identify motion or other events The Disclosing Party agrees that the foregoing shall not apply with respect to any information that the Receiving Party can document ( a) is or becomes generally available to the public, or (b) was in its possession or known by it prior to receipt from the Disclosing Party, or ( c) was rightfully disclosed to it without restriction by a third party, or ( d) was independently developed without use of any Proprietary Information of the Disclosing Parry Nothing in this Agreement will prevent the Receiving Party from disclosing the Proprietary Information pursuant to any judicial or governmental order, provided that the Receiving Party gives the Disclosing Party reasonable prior notice of such disclosure to contest such order For clarity, Company may access, use, preserve and/ or disclose the Recordings to law enforcement authonties, government officials, and/ or third parties, if legally required to do so or if Company has a good faith belief that such access, use, preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to ( a) compl} with a legal process or request ( b) enforce this Agreement, including investigation of any potential violation thereof ( c) detect, prevent or otherwise address security fraud or technical issues or d) protect the rights, property or safety of Compan} its users a third part} or the public as required or permitted by law including respond to an emergency situation Company may store deleted Recordings in order to comply with certain legal obligations but such retained Recordings will not be retrievable without a valid court order
3 2 Customer shall own all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Data Company shall own and retain all right, title and interest in and to ( a) the Services, Hardware and Software, all improvements, enhancements or modifications thereto ( b) any software, applications, inventions or other technology developed in connection with Implementation Services or On- site Services, and ( c) all intellectual property rights related to any of the foregoing If Customer provides any suggestions, ideas, enhancement requests, feedbaelti, recommendations or other information relating to the subject matter hereunder, Customer hereby assigns ( and will cause its agents and representatives to assign) to Company all right, title and interest ( including tntellectual property nghts) with respect to or resulting from any of the foregoing
3 3 Subject to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Company grants Customer a limited, non exclusive, non transferable, non- sublicensable, revocable right to use ( a) the Embedded Software as installed in the Unit by Company and ( b) any other Software provided by Company hereunder, solely in the form provided by Company, in each case, solely as necessary for Customer to use the Services This Agreement is a license not a sale of Software ( including any Embedded Software) and does not convey to Customer any rights of olxnerslup in or related to the Software For clarity this Agreement also does not convey to Customer any rights of ownership in or related to the Hardware
34 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Company shall have the right to collect and analyze data and other information relating to the provision, use and performance of various aspects of the Services and related systems and technologies ( including, without limitation, information concerning Customer Data and data derived therefrom) and Company will be free ( during and after the term hereof) to ( i) use such information and data to improve and enhance the Services and for other development diagnostic and corrective purposes GDS VF& HV 180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 614 of 728
in connection with the Services and other Compan] offerings and ( n) disclose such data solei} in aggregate or other de -identified form in connection with its business No rights or licenses are granted except as expressly set forth herein

4. PAYMENT OF FEES
4 1 Customer will pay Company the applicable fees as set forth on the Order Form (the " Fees') All payments will be made in accordance with the Payment Schedule and the Method of payment If not otherwise specified, payments will be due within thirty ( 30) days of invoice and are nonrefundable 42 Company reserves the right to change the Fees or applicable charges and to institute new charges and Fees at the end of the Initial Service Term or then current renewal term, upon thirty ( 30) days prior notice to Customer which may be sent by email) If Customer believes that Company has billed Customer incorrectly, Customer must contact Compan} no later than sixt} ( 60) da} s after the closing date on the first billmg statement in which the error or problem appeared, in order to receive an adjustment or credit Inquines should be directed to Company' s customer support department
4 3 Company may choose to bill through an invoice, in which case, full payment for invoices issued in any given month must be received by Company thirty ( 30) days after the mailing date of the invoice Unpaid amounts are subject to a finance charge of 15% per month on any outstanding balance, or the maximum permitted by law, whichever is lower, plus all expenses of collection, and may result in immediate termination of Service Customer shall be responsible for all taxes associated with Services other than U S taxes based on Company' s net income

5. TERM AND TERMINATION
5 1 Subject to earlier termination as provided below, this Agreement is for the Service Term as specified in the Order Form
52 In the event of any material breach of this Agreement, the non breaching party may terminate flus Agreement prior to the end of the Service Term by giving thirty ( 30) days prior wzitten notice to the breaching party provided, however, that this Agreement will not ternunate if the breaching party has cured the breach prior to the expiration of such thirty -day period Either party may terminate this Agreement, without notice, ( i) upon the institution by or against the other party of insolvency, receivership or bankruptcy proceedings, ( n) upon the other party's making an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or (iia) upon the other party' s dissolution or ceasing to do business Upon termination for Company' s breach, Company will refund to Customer a pro -rata portion of the pre paid Fees for Services not received due to such termination. 53 Upon any temimation, Company will collect all Units, delete all Customer Data and Customer' s right to access or use any Software, and all licenses granted by Company hereunder will immediately cease 54 The following sections will survive termination 2 1, 2 2, 2 3, 5 ( with respect to any accrued rights to payment) and 6- 8

REMEDY, WARRANTY AND DISCLAIMER
6 1 Upon a malfunction or failure of Hardware or Embedded Software ( a ` Defect' ), Customer must first make commercially reasonable efforts to address the problem by contacting Company' s technical support as described in Section 1 2 above If such efforts do not correct the Defect, Company shall, or shall instruct one of its contractors to, in its sole discretion, repair or replace the Hardware or Embedded Software suffering from the Defect Company reserves the right to refuse or delay replacement or its choice of remedy for a Defect until after it has inspected and tested the affected Unit, provided that such inspection and test shall occur within 72 hours after Customer notifies the Company of defect Company agrees to replace cameras once at no cost to Customer in the event of theft or damage Subsequent replacement due to damage or theft will be at Customer s own expense with a replacement cost of $300 per camera GDS`VF' RHV 180' 736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 615 of 728
62 Company will not protide the remedy described in Section 6 1 above if any of the follow=ing exclusions apply a) mrsuse of the Hardware or Embedded Software in any manner, mcludm- operation of the Hardware or Embedded Soft%vare in any way that does not strictly comply with any applicable specifications, documentation, or other restrictions on use provided by Company, ( b) damage, alteration; or modification of the Hardware or Embedded Software in any way, or ( c) combination of the Hardware or Embedded Software with softer are, hardware or other technology that was not expressly authorized by Company 6 Company shall use reasonable efforts consistent with prevailing industry standards to maintain the Services in a manner which minimizes errors and interruptions in the Seances and shall perform the Implementation Services in a professional and workmanlike manner Services may be temporarily unavailable for scheduled maintenance or for unscheduled emergency maintenance, either by Company or by third -party providers, or because of other causes beyond Company s reasonable control, but Company shall use reasonable efforts to provide advance notice in writing or by e- mail of any scheduled service disruption HOWEVER, THE REMEDY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 61 ABOVE IS CUSTOMER' S SOLE REMEDY, AND

COMPANY S SOLE LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO DEFECTIVE HARDWARE AND/ OR

EMBEDDED SOFTWARE THE COMPANY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SERVICES WILL BE

UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE, NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE RESULTS

THAT MAYBE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SERVICES EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION, THE SERVICES AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES ARE PROVIDED " AS IS"

AND COMPANY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT

LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A

PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON -INFRINGEMENT
141Ori10ENI[ iKEi3: 9110 1Oil WA

NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY EXCEPT FOR BODILY INJURY OF A

PERSON, COMPANY AND ITS SUPPLIERS ( INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL HARDWARE AND

TECHNOLOGY SUPPLIERS), OFFICERS, AFFILIATES, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS AND

EMPLOYEES SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF

THIS AGREEMENT OR TERMS AND CONDITIONS RELATED THERETO UNDER ANY CONTRACT,

NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER THEORY ( A) FOR ERROR OR INTERRUPTION OF USE

OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OR CORRUPTION OF DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF

SUBSTITUTE GOODS SERVICES OR TECHNOLOGY OR LOSS OF BUSINESS ( B) FOR ANY INDIRECT

EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, ( C) FOR ANY MATTER

BEYOND COMPANY' S REASONABLE CONTROL, OR ( D) FOR ANY AMOUNTS THAT, TOGETHER WITH

AMOUNTS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL OTHER CLAIMS, EXCEED THE FEES PAID AND/ OR PAYABLE BY CUSTOMER TO COMPANY FOR THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR

TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY, IN EACH CASE, WHETHER OR NOT COMPANY HAS

BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, CUSTOMER SHOULD CONTACT 911 AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE SERVICES 8 MISCELLANEOUS
81 If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable
82 This Agreement is not assignable, transferable or sublicensable by Customer except with Company' s prior written consent Company may transfer and assign any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement without consent
83 This Agreement is the complete and exclusive statement of the mutual understanding of the parties and supersedes and cancels all previous written and oral agreements, communications and other understandings relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and that all waivers and modifications must be in a writing signed by both parties except as otherwise provided herein_ GDSVF& Hu180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 616 of 728
84 No agency, partnership, point venture, or employment is created as a result of this Agreement and Customer does not have ani authority of any kind to bind Company in any respect whatsoever In any action or proceeding to enforce rights under this Agreement the prevailing paM will be entitled to recover costs and attorneys' fees
8 o All notices under this Agreement will be i n writing and will be deemed to have been duly given when received, if personally delivered, when receipt is electronically confirmed, iftransrmtted by facsimile or e- mail, the day after it is sent, if sent for next day delivery by recognized overnight delivery service and upon receipt, if sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested 86 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia without regard to its conflict of laws provisions The federal and state courts sitting in Atlanta, Georgia will have proper and exclusive jurisdiction and venue with respect to any disputes ansuig from or related to the subject matter of this Agreement 87 Customer grants Company permission to install cameras and sigilage at agreed upon locations and to perforin labor at agreed upon locations
Gi7SVF& H\ 3180736. 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 617 of 728

EXHIBIT A
Statement of Work
Installation of Flock Gate Cameras
Installation of Flock signage
Installation of NIA foot poles ( one for each camera)
Training for installation of camera on existing poles to employees GDSVF& H13180736. 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 618 of 728

SAAS ORDER FORM
Customer Redlands Police Department Contact Travis Martinez Address 30 Colon Street
GA 92373
Phone 908- 557- 6583
E
tmartinez@redlandspolice org
Services Flock' s software for automatic license plate detection of video recorded by the Flock Gate Cameras ( the Hardware") searching image records, and a platform for sharing those records with Customer, in the form such software is provided by Flock to Customer (" Sen,ice( s)") For clarity, the Services are reliant on use of the Hardware Fees. $
7, 500
per
Year
Service Term
12 Number of Cameras
5 The initial term of this Agreement shall be 12
months, subject to early termination ( the " Initial Service Tenn") Following the Initial Service Term, flus
Agreement will automatically renew for successive
renewal terms of 0 months subject to early
termination ( each, a " Renewal Term", and together with the Initial Term, the " Service Term") unless either party gives the other party notice of non -renewal at least
ninety ( 90) days prior to the end of the then -current term.

Payment Schedule [ Payable thirty (30) days in advance Method of Payment ACH or Check of each time period indicated above, subject to the terms of Section 5 herein]
Implementation Services Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Customer the services described in the Statement of Work C' SOW") attached as Exhibit A hereto (" Implementation Services"), and Customer shall pay Company the Implementation Fee in accordance with the terms herein Implementation Fee ( one- time) $
0 SAAS SERVICES AGREEMENT
This SaaS Services Agreement (" Agreement") is entered into on this 30 day of
August 2018 (
the " Effective
Date") between Flock Group Inc with a place of business at 2599 Winslow Drive Atlanta GA 30305 ('Company'), and the Customer listed above (" Customer") This Agreement includes and incorporates the above Order Form. as well as the attached Terms and Conditions and contains_ among other things. warranty disclaimers, liability limitations and use limitations There shall be no force or effect to any different terms of any related purchase order or similar form even if signed by the parties after the date hereof Flock Group Inc.
t17
M_
Name Garrett Langley
Title
CEO
GDSNIF& 1113180736 5
Customer Name -
ATTEST
J ne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 619 of 728

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SERVICES AND SUPPORT
I 1 Subject to the terms of tlus Agreement, Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Customer the Services The Services include access to a platform for viewing , video footage ( the ` Recordings') The Recordings will be available for Customer to access for 30 days Customer may be required to sign up for an account, and select a password and user name (" Company User ID') 12 Subject to the terms hereof, Company will provide Customer with reasonable technical and on site support and maintenance services (` On -Site Services') in-person or by email at hello@,,flocksafety com Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to respond to requests for support 1 3 Customer agrees to provide Company with accurate, complete, and updated registration information Customer may not select as its Company User ID a name that Customer does not have the right to use, or another person' s name with the intent to impersonate that person Customer may not transfer its account to anyone else without prior, written permission Customer will not share its account or password with anyone, and must protect the security of its account and password Customer is responsible for any activity associated with its account 2 1 Customer will not, directly or indirectly reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the source code, object code or underlying structure, ideas, know hove or algorithms relevant to the Senvices, certain software embedded on the Hardware by Company (" Embedded Software"), or any other software or documentation or data related to the Services ( collectively, " Software") ( except that such prohibition shall not apply to the extent applicable law prohibits such restriction) modify translate or create derivative works based on the Services, Hardware or any Software ( except to the e%tent expressly permitted by Company or authorized within the Services), use the Services, Hardware or any Software for tunesbarmg or service bureau purposes or otherwise for the benefit of a third party, or remove any proprietary notices or labels
22 Further, Customer may not remove or export from the United States or allow the export or re- export of the Services, Hardware, Software or anythmg related thereto, or any direct product thereof in violation of any restrictions laws or regulations of the United States Department of Commerce the United States Department of Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control or any other United States or foreign agency or authonty As defined in FAR section 2 101 the Software and documentation are - commercial items" and according to DFAR section 252 2277014( a)( 1) and ( 3) are deemed to be " commercial computer software'' and " commercial computer software documentation " Consistent with DEAR section 227 7202 and FAR section 12 212, any use, modification, reproduction, release, performance, display, or disclosure of such commercial sofhvare or commercial software documentation by the U S Government will be governed solely by the terms of this Agreement and will be prohibited except to the extent expressly permitted by the terms of this Agreement 2 3 Customer represents, covenants, and warrants that Customer will use the Services only in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable laves and regulations, including but not limited to any laws relating to the recording or sharing of video or audio content Customer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Compan} against any damages losses liabilities settlements and expenses ( including without limitation costs and attorneys' fees) in connection with any claim or action that arises from an alleged violation of the foregoing or otherwise from Customer' s use of the Services, Hardware and any Software, including any claim that such actions violate any applicable law or third party right Although Company has no obligation to monitor Customer s use of the Services, Company may do so and may prohibit any use of the Services it believes may be ( or alleged to be) in violation of the foregoing
24 Customer shall be responsible for obtaining and mamtanung any equipment and ancillary services needed to connect to, access or otherwise use the Services References to the " Unit" herein mean Hardware together with Embedded Software while references to ` Hardware mean such hardware alone excluding any software or Firmware of any Lind Customer will not be able to access the Services except through the Unit, and the Umt will no longer function when this Agreement is terminated Upon termination of this Agreement, Company will collect all Units
GDSVF& M\ 3180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 620 of 728

CONFIDENTIALITY, PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
3 1 Each party ( the " Receiving Party") understands that the other party ( the " Disclosing Parry") has disclosed or may disclose business technical or financial information relating to the Disclosing Part} s business ( hereinafter referred to as " Proprietary Information" ofthe Disclosing Party) Proprietary Information of Company includes non-public information regarding features, functionality and performance of the Services Proprietar) Information ofCustomer includes non-public data provided by Customer to Company or collected by Company via the Unit, including the Recordings, to enable the provision of the Services, which includes but is not limited to geolocation information and environmental data collected by sensors built into the Units (" Customer Data") The Receiving Party agrees ( i) to tale the same security precautions to protect against disclosure or unauthorized use of such Proprietary Information that the party tales with its own proprietary information, but in no event will a part), apply less than reasonable precautions to protect such Proprietary Information, and ( u) not to use ( except in performance of the Services or as otherwise permitted herein) or divulge to any third person any such Proprietary Information Company' s use of the Proprietary Informnation may include processing the Proprietary Informnation to send Customer alerts such as when a car exits Customer' s neighborhood, or to analyze the data collected to identify, motion or other events The Disclosing Party agrees that the foregoing shall not apply with respect to any information that the Receiving Party can document ( a) is or becomes generally available to the public, or ( b) was in its possession or known by it prior to receipt from the Disclosing Party, or ( c) was rightfully disclosed to it without restriction by a third party, or ( d) was independently developed without use of any Proprietary Information of the Disclosing Party Nothing in this Agreement will prevent the Receiving Party from disclosing the Proprietary Information pursuant to any judicial or governmental order, provided that the Receiving Party gives the Disclosing Party reasonable prior notice of such disclosure to contest such order For clarity, Company may access, use, preserve and/or disclose the Recordings to law enforcement authorities, government officials, and/ or third parties, if legally required to do so or if Company has a good faith belief that such access, use, preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to ( a) comply with a Iegal process or request, ( b) enforce this Agreement, including investigation of any potential violation thereof, ( c) detect, prevent or otherwise address security, fraud or technical issues, or d) protect the rights, property or safety of Company, its users, a third party, or the public as required or permitted by law, including respond to an emergency situation Company may store deleted Recordings in order to comply with certain legal obligations but such retained Recordings will not be retrievable without a valid court order
3 2 Customer shall own all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Data Company shall own and retain all right title and interest in and to ( a) the Services Hardware and Software all improvements enhancements or modifications thereto, ( b) any software, applications, inventions or other technology developed in connection with Implementation Services or On- site Services, and (c) all intellectual property rights related to any of the foregoing If Customer provides any suggestions. ideas, enhancement requests, feedback, recommendations or other information relating to the subject matter hereunder Customer hereby assigns ( and will cause its agents and representatives to assign) to Company all right; title and interest ( including intellectual property rights) with respect to or resulting from any of the foregoing
3 3 Subject to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Company grants Customer a limted, non exclusive, non transferable, non- sublicensable, revocable right to use ( a) the Embedded Software as installed in the Unit by Company and ( b) any, other Software provided by Company hereunder solely in the form provided by Company, in each case, solely as necessary for Customer to use the Services This Agreement is a license, not a sale, of Software ( including any Embedded Software) and does not convey to Customer any rights of ownership in or related to the Software For clarity this Agreement also does not convey to Customer any rights of ownership in or related to the Hardware
34 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Company shall have the right to collect and analyze data and other information relating to the provision, use and performance of various aspects of the Services and related systems and technologies ( including, without limitation_ information concerning Customer Data and data derived therefrom), and Company will be free ( during and after the term hereof) to ( i) use such information and data to improve and enhance the Services and for other development diagnostic and corrective purposes GDSVF f.H\ 3180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 621 of 728
in connection with the Services and other Company offerings and ( n) disclose such data solely in aggregate or other de identified form in connection with its business No rights or licenses are granted except as expressly set forth herein

PAYMENT OF FEES
4 1 Customer will pay Company the applicable fees asset forth on the Order form ( the " Fees") All payments will be made in accordance with the Payment Schedule and the Method ofPayment If not otherwise specified, pa} ments will be due within thirt} ( 30) days of invoice and are nonrefundable 42 Company reserves the right to change the Fees or applicable charges and to institute new charges and Fees at the end of the Initial Service Term or then current rene-, aI term, upon thirty ( 30) days prior notice to Customer which may be sent by email) If Customer believes that Company has billed Customer incorrectly, Customer must contact Company no later than sixty (60) days after the closing date on the first billing statement m v; hich the error or problem appeared, in order to receive an adjustment or credit Inquiries should be directed to Company' s customer support department
4 3 Company may choose to bill through an invoice, in winch case, full payment for invoices issued in any given month must be received by Company thirty ( 30) days after the mailing date of the invoice Unpaid amounts are subject to a finance charge of 15% per month on any outstanding balance or the maximum permitted by law, whichever is lower, plus all expenses of collection, and may result in immediate termination of Service Customer shall be responsible for all taxes associated - with Services other than U S taxes based on Company' s net income

TERM AND TERMINATION
5 1 Subject to earlier termination as provided beloA this Agreement is for the Service Term as specified in the Order Form
52 In the event of any material breach of this Agreement the non breaching party may terminate this Agreement prior to the end of the Service Term by giving thirty ( 30) days prior 1ATitten notice to the breaching party, provided, however, that this Agreement will not terminate if the breaching party has cured the breach prior to the expiration of such thirty day period Either party may terminate this Agreement, without notice, ( i) upon the institution by or against the other party of insolvency, receivership or bankruptcy proceedings ( u) upon the other party' s making an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or (in) upon the other party' s dissolution or ceasing to do business Upon termination for Company s breach; Company will refund to Customer a pro -rata portion of the pre -paid Fees for Services not received due to such termination 5 3 Upon any termination, Company will collect all Units, delete all Customer Data and Customer' s right to access or use any Software, and all licenses granted by Company hereunder will immediately cease 54 The following sections will survive termination 2 1, 2 2, 2 3, 5 ( with respect to any accrued rights to payment) and 6- 8

REMEDY, WARRANTY AND DISCLAIMER
6 1 Upon a malfunction or failure of Hardware or Embedded Software ( a ` Defect'), Customer must first make commercially reasonable efforts to address the problem by contacting Company' s technical support as described in Section 1 2 above If such efforts do not correct the Defect, Compan3 shall, or shall instruct one of its contractors to, in its sole discretion, repair or replace the Hardware or Embedded Software suffering from the Defect Company reserves the right to refuse or delay replacement or its choice of remedy for a Defect until after it has inspected and tested the affected Unit, provided that such inspection and test shall occur within 72 hours after Customer notifies the Company of defect Company agrees to replace cameras once at no cost to Customer in the event of theft or damage Subsequent replacement due to damage or theft will be at Customer' s oi m expense with a replacement cost of $ 300 per camera GDSVF&: H13180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 622 of 728
62 Company will not provide the remedy described in Section 6 1 above if any of the following exclusions apply a) misuse of the Hardware or Embedded Software in any manner, including operation of the Hardware or Embedded Software in any way that does not strictly comply with any applicable specifications, documentation, or other restrictions on use provided by Company ( b) damage alteration, or modification of the Hardware or Embedded Software in any way , or ( c) combination of the Hardware or Embedded Software with software. hardware or other technology that was not expressly authorized by Company 6 3 Company shall use reasonable efforts consistent with prevailing industry standards to maintain the Services in a manner which minimizes errors and interruptions in the Services and shall perform the Implementation Services in a professional and workmanlike manner Services may be temporarily unavailable for scheduled maintenance or for unscheduled emergency maintenance, either by Company or by third party providers, or because of other causes beyond Company' s reasonable control but Company shall use reasonable efforts to pros ide advance notice in lvntmg or by e- mail of any scheduled sen ice disruption HOWEVER, THE REMEDY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 61 ABOVE IS CUSTOMER' S SOLE REMEDY, AND

COMPANY S SOLE LIABILITY, WITH RESPECT TO DEFECTIVE HARDWARE AND/ OR

EMBEDDED SOFTWARE THE COMPANY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SERVICES WILL BE

UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE, NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE RESULTS

THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SERVICES EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION, THE SERVICES AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES ARE PROVIDED " AS IS"

AND COMPANY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A

PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON INFRINGEMENT
i i rrr c.• a> tne3 rw

NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY EXCEPT FOR BODILY INJURY OF A

PERSON, COMPANY AND ITS SUPPLIERS ( INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL HARDWARE AND

TECHNOLOGY SUPPLIERS), OFFICERS, AFFILIATES, REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS AND

EMPLOYEES SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF

THIS AGREEMENT OR TERMS AND CONDITIONS RELATED THERETO UNDER ANY CONTRACT,

NEGLIGENCE STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER THEORY ( A) FOR ERROR OR INTERRUPTION OF USE

OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OR CORRUPTION OF DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF

SUBSTITUTE GOODS, SERVICES OR TECHNOLOGY OR LOSS OF BUSINESS, ( B) FOR ANY INDIRECT,

EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, ( C) FOR ANY MATTER

BEYOND COMPANY' S REASONABLE CONTROL, OR ( D) FOR ANY AMOUNTS THAT, TOGETHER WITH

AMOUNTS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL OTHER CLAIMS, EXCEED THE FEES PAID AND/OR PAYABLE BY CUSTOMER TO COMPANY FOR THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR

TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY, IN EACH CASE, WHETHER OR NOT COMPANY HAS

BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, CUSTOMER SHOULD CONTACT 911 AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE SERVICES

AUSCELLANEOUS
81 If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable
82 This Agreement is not assignable, transferable or sublieensable by Customer except with Company s prior written consent Company may transfer and assign any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement Nlnthout consent
8 3 This Agreement is the complete and exclusive statement of the mutual understanding of the parties and supersedes and cancels all previous written and oral agreements, communications and other understandings relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, and that all waivers and modifications must be in a wntmg signed by both parties, except as otherwise provided herein GDS' vT&-HV" 180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 623 of 728
84 No agency partnership joint venture or employment is created as a result of this Agreement and Customer does not have any authority of an) land to bind Company in any respect whatsoever In any action or proceeding to enforce rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to recover costs and attorneys fees
85 All notices under this Agreement will be m writing and will be deemed to have been duly given when received, if personally delivered when receipt is electronically confirmed, iftransmitted by facsimile or e- mail, the day after it is sent, if sent for neat day delivery by recognized ovemight delivery seance, and upon receipt, if sent by certified or registered marl, return receipt requested 86 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia without regard to its conflict of laws provisions The federal and state courts sitting in Atlanta Georgia will have proper and exclusive jurisdiction and venue with respect to any disputes arising from or related to the subject matter of this Agreement 87 Customer grants Company permission to install cameras and signage at agreed upon locations and to perform labor at agreed upon locations
GDSVFRHU 180736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 624 of 728

EXHIBIT A
Statement of Work
Installation of Flock. Gate Cameras
Installation of Flock signage
Installation of N/ A foot poles ( one for each camera)
Training for installation of camera on existing poles to employees GT7S F& H\,31So736 5
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 625 of 728
City Council Meeting J. 21.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Universal Protection Service, LP, DBA Allied Universal Security Services to amend the total to an amount not to exceed $135,785.28 (Assistant City Manager Boatman)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Universal Protection Service, LP, DBA Allied Universal Security Services to amend the total to an amount not to exceed $135,785.28.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Universal Protection Service, LP, DBA Allied Universal Security Services to amend the total to an amount not to exceed $135,785.28.

DISCUSSION:

In September 2021, the City Council approved an Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Agreement) with Redlands Community Investment Corporation which allowed the City to assume the existing service contracts and tenant agreements for the newly acquired facility located at 300 E. State Street.

Included within the Agreement was the services of Universal Protection Service, LP, /DBA Allied Universal Security Services (Allied Universal) for security services at the facility.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 626 of 728
In June, 2022, the City Council approved an Agreement and Sole Source Purchase Order with Allied Universal in a not to exceed amount of $107,549 for security services. Effective January 1, 2023, the State of California will raise the minimum wage, requiring a higher per hour rate for security services. Based on these changes, an amendment to the agreement and modification to the purchase order are required to provide for expenses that will be incurred through June 30, 2023.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may elect not to approve the modification to the purchase orders and direct staff accordingly.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:

Tricia Swope, Manager, Facilities & Community Services
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2022-23
Amount: 135,785.28
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Account No.: 101310
Discussion:

Sufficient funding for these services are included in the City Hall State Street (101310) budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 as approved by City Council.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 627 of 728
Attachments
A. 1st Amendment to Agreement
B. Agreement with Universal Protection Services
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 628 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\1st Amendment Universal Protection Services FY2022-087.docx-jm

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PERFORM NON-PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES FOR EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
This first amendment (“First Amendment”) to the agreement for professional security services (“Agreement”), dated June 21, 2022, by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation and a general law city (“City”), and Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services (“Contractor”), is made and entered into this 20th day of December, 2022.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend their existing Agreement, specifically the schedule and total compensation for Contractor’s performance of the Services; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration in the receipt of which is hereby acknowledge City and Contractor agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
Section 1. Section 5.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Total compensation for Contractor’s performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Seven Hundred Eight-Five Dollars and TwentyEight Cents ($135,785.28). City shall pay Contractor on a time and materials basis up the not to exceed amount in accordance with Exhibit “B” title “Fee Schedule,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.”
Section 2. Exhibit “A” entitled “Scope of Services” and Exhibit “B” entitled “Fee Schedule” set forth in the Agreement are hereby replaced with a new Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B”which are attached hereto and incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.

Section 3. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged by this First Amendment and in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment, to be effective as of January 1, 2023.
[Signatures on the Next Page]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 629 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Agreements\1st Amendment Universal Protection Services FY2022-087.docx-jm

CITY OF REDLANDS UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LP,
dba ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY

SERVICES
________________________________ By: ________________________________ Paul T. Barich, Mayor Steve Clayton, President Southwest Region
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 630 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Agreements\1st Amendment Universal Protection Services FY2022-087.docx-jm EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Provide unarmed, uniformed professional security officers who are capable of exercising good judgement, will be highly visible at all times, deter crime, and perform other duties as outlined by the City.

SCHEDULE

FRI SAT SUN MON TUES WED THUR
7AM – 3PM 1 officer 1 officer - 1 officer 1 officer 1 officer 1 officer 3PM – 11PM 1 officer - - 1 officer 1 officer 1 officer 1 officer

HOLIDAYS
New Year’s Day
President’s Day
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 631 of 728
4 I:\cmo\Agreements\1st Amendment Universal Protection Services FY2022-087.docx-jm EXHIBIT "B"

FEE SCHEDULE
Staff Weekly Hours Bill Rate Holiday / O.T. Rate
Security Professionals 88 $30.01 $45.02
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 632 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 633 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 634 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 635 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 636 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 637 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 638 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 639 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 640 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 641 of 728
City Council Meeting J. 22.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the in-kind support for use of the Redlands Sports Park in the amount of $66,584 for Redlands Region 50 of the American Youth Soccer Organization (Assistant City Manager Boatman) MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move to approve the in-kind support for use of the Redlands Sports Park in the amount of $66,584 for Redlands Region 50 of the American Youth Soccer Organization.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the contribution of in-kind support for use of the Redlands Sports Park in the amount of $66,584 for Redlands Region 50 of the American Youth Soccer Organization.

DISCUSSION:

Redlands Region 50 of American Youth Soccer Organization ("AYSO") is a long-standing non-profit group that has continually offered recreational soccer programming to the Redlands community for many years. The City considers AYSO a valued partner in providing these opportunities and is committed to ensuring the continued success of AYSO in Redlands.

The City has been meeting with AYSO to negotiate a new agreement for use of the Redlands Sports Park. AYSO’s previous agreement was terminated on December 14, 2022, to be replaced by the new agreement. The City plans to issue a one-year permit to AYSO to allow continued and uninterrupted use of the Sports Park while negotiations proceed. The previous agreement included the use of all fields during all usable hours. Consequently, AYSO would normally be Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 642 of 728
use of all fields during all usable hours. Consequently, AYSO would normally be subject to a significantly higher fee under the City’s current fee structure than it previously paid. Therefore, a contribution of in-kind support is necessary to allow AYSO to use the fields for a fee comparable to its previous rent.

AYSO’s previous agreement included the use of all 8 fields of the sports park from 4:30 p.m. through 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, use of all fields on Saturdays and Sundays from 6:00 a.m. through 10:00 p.m., and exclusive use of the snack bar. Based on this schedule, the usage equates to 476 hours per week or 24,752 hours per year. The City’s current fee schedule includes a $5 per hour charge per field for traditional Rec Leagues. Applying this fee, the total charge for the year would equate to $123,760. Other fees would typically apply, such as non-resident fees, club team fees, and tournament fees. However, staff is only applying the Rec League fee for the purpose of this calculation. Under the previous agreement, AYSO paid an annual rent of $57,175, with an annual payment of $37,175 per year and pre-paid rent of $20,000 per year. Therefore, in order to maintain AYSO’s previous rent, an in-kind contribution of $66,584 is necessary in the form of a park fee credit to maintain the rent of $57,175.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose to deny the contribution of in-kind support. In this case, AYSO would be subject to the standard City fees for use of the Sports Park.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
PREPARED BY:

Don Craw, Senior Manager FCS
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 643 of 728
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2022-23
Revenue Generating: N
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: 66,584
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Discussion:

In anticipation of the City Council's consideration of this request, staff has compiled the following table outlining costs related to fees established by resolution of the City Council and departmental charges pertaining to personnel and equipment resources necessary for the support of the event. The departmental charges are costs outside of normal city operations that would not be incurred by the City if the special event was not taking place.

Departmental Charges
(Personnel & Equipment)
Amount Type
Personnel & Equipment Subtotal
Fees Established by City Council Resolution
Sports Field Reservation $66,584 Soft Cost
Fees Subtotal $66,584
Total Departmental Charges and Fees $66,584
1Personnel costs are calculated conservatively assuming the highest staff cost scenario. Actual costs may vary on the day of the event based on the actual staff present. Actual costs will be confirmed following the event and will be included in a reconciliation report presented to the City Council.

The following table summarizes the total estimated costs associated with the use of City resources and in-kind support approved for events scheduled during Fiscal Year 2022-23 to date:

TABLE 2: FY 2022-23 Fee Waivers to date
Hard Costs Soft Costs Deposits
Refunded
In-kind support
Amount
Net
Amount
$171,216 $5,751.50 $5,500 $182,467.50 $176,967.50
Attachments
A. Verification of nonprofit
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 644 of 728
12/13/22, 9:36 AM Tax Exempt Organization Search Details | Internal Revenue Service https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/details/ 1/3
American Youth Soccer
Organization
EIN: 95-6205398 | Torrance, California, United States
Publication 78 Data
Organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions. Users may rely on this list in determining deductibility of their contributions.

On Publication 78 Data List: Yes
Deductibility Code: PC
Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Organizations who have filed a 990-N (e-Postcard) annual electronic notice.

Most small organizations that receive less than $50,000 fall into this category.

Tax Period:
2009 (01/01/2009-12/31/2009)
EIN:
95-6205398
Organization Name (Doing Business as):

AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION
Mailing Address:

PO BOX 1882
CHULA VISTA, CA 91912
United States
Principal Officer's Name and Address:

STACY PAYNE
PO BOX 1882
CHULA VISTA, CA 91912
United States
Gross receipts not greater than:
$50,000
Organization has terminated:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 645 of 728
City Council Meeting K. 1.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action relating to the selection of two City Council representatives to serve on the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Regional Recycled Water Ad Hoc Committee (Mayor Barich)
MOTION:

I move to designate ______________________________ to serve as a Redlands City Council representative on the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Regional Recycled Water Ad Hoc Committee.

1. I move to designate ______________________________ to serve as a Redlands City Council representative on the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Regional Recycled Water Ad Hoc Committee.

2. DISCUSSION:

Like many agencies within the basin, Redlands is engineering recycled water projects to increase percolation back into the basin. The process increases salt loading and eventually will require some type of mitigation. Rather than placing the full mitigation burden on a single entity, the wastewater agencies within the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD) service area are working together to identify a regional solution in which all parties would financially participate.

On June 16, 2015, the SBVMWD Board authorized the development of a Regional Recycled Water Plan. Later on August 4, 2015, the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District voted unanimously to create a Regional Recycled Water Ad Hoc Committee to assist in developing the Regional Recycled Water Plan.

The Ad Hoc would consist of two elected officials of agencies partnering with the District on the Recycled Water Project, who would meet on an as-needed basis.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 646 of 728
SUBMITTED BY:

John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Attachments
SBVMWD Regular Board Meeting Minutes Aug. 4, 2015
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 647 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 648 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 649 of 728
City Council Meeting K. 2.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action on Ordinance No. 2954 and Resolution No. 8429 relating to the process for filling vacancies on the City Council (Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda)
MOTION:

Should the City Council concur with Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda’s recommendation, the following motions are provided:

Mayor requests the City Clerk to read the title of proposed Ordinance No. 2954.

1. I move to waive further reading of, and to introduce, Ordinance No. 2954.

2. I move to approve Resolution No. 8429.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council introduce Ordinance No. 2954 and approve Resolution No. 8429.

DISCUSSION:

When a City Council vacancy occurs, cities generally have the option of filling the vacancy by either appointing a person or holding a special election. If the City Council elects to make an appointment, the appointment must be made within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the vacancy.

State law does not mandate that the City Council use any particular method of appointment. It is common in such situations for the Council to post a notice of vacancy and invite applications from eligible persons to apply, followed by an interview of applicants. Deliberations by the Council and the appointment must be done at a public meeting, though it can be done at a special or regular meeting.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 650 of 728
Mayor Pro Tem Tejeda proposes that the City Council adopt a procedure for making appointments should there be a vacancy on the City Council in the future. The proposal would amend the Redlands Municipal Code Chapter 2.02 (Ordinance No. 2954) and set forth the appointment process by City Council Resolution (Resolution No. 8429). Establishing the appointment process by Resolution would allow the Council to readily make changes should there be changes in the law or to accommodate the changing needs of the City Council.

The proposed appointment process would require that the City Council first consider the appointment of any interested former council member who lives in the district of the vacated council seat. If no former council member is interested in the appointment or lives in the district, the City Council would open the process to any interested resident living in the district. Interested residents would submit an application and participate in an interview process conducted by the City Council during an open and public meeting. The appointment would be made by the Council at a special meeting.

SUBMITTED BY:

Yvette Abich Garcia, City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:

Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
PREPARED BY:

Larry Alms, Administrative Analyst
Fiscal Impact
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact with the receipt and filing of the 2022 National Community Survey.

Attachments
Resolution No. 8429
Ordinance No. 2954
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 651 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8429 Filling Council Vacancy.docx
RESOLUTION NO. 8429

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

ESTABLISHING THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR FILLING A

VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, under Government Code Section 36512, the City Council must fill a vacancy on the City Council within sixty (60) days from the effective date of the vacancy by special election or by appointment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council added Section 2.02.060 to the Redlands Municipal Code titled, “Filling Vacancies on the City Council”, incorporating by reference Government Code Section 36512 and authorizing the City Council to establish an appointment process for filling a vacancy on the City Council by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that calling a special election provides the citizens of the City of Redlands the greatest level of transparency for filling a vacancy on the city council, but the City may, at times, not have the funds to cover the cost of a special election; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is a cost benefit to filling a vacancy by way of appointment; and
WHEREAS, it is in the City’s best interest to establish an orderly process for filling a vacancy on the city council and require the city council to follow such process whenever a vacancy occurs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts a process for filling a vacancy on the City Council by appointment as follows:

A. Upon the effective date of a vacancy on the city council, city staff shall identify former members of the city council who live within the boundaries of the council district where the vacancy occurred. The mayor or a designee shall contact and interview such persons to ascertain the level of interest and availability to fill such vacancy. Once all interviews have been completed, but no later than seven (7) business days from the effective date of the vacancy, the mayor or a designee shall report any findings to the city council during an open session. The city council will schedule a special meeting to discuss the results of the findings and act to formally fill the city council vacancy with a former council member by way of a majority vote of the total membership of the city council.

B. Only when a vacancy cannot be filled by appointing a former member of the city council, the city council shall accept applications submitted by eligible citizens of the City of Redlands who are interested in filling the vacancy.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 652 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8429 Filling Council Vacancy.docx
C. Applications must be accompanied by a resume and a letter of interest that describes the applicant’s community involvement and service.

D. Applicants must live within the boundaries of the council district where a vacancy has occurred. The application period shall be five (5) business days not including any holidays or days in which city offices are closed.

E. A special meeting will be called by the city council to interview all applicants.

During the interview process, council members may only ask questions related to an applicant’s knowledge of city matters, knowledge of issues of concern for the city, community involvement, leadership experiences, community service experience, public or military service or other work or professional experiences that readily translates to public service.

F. The City Clerk shall be the presiding officer over the process to fill a vacancy during the special meeting and therefore has full discretion over all matters related to such process. Furthermore, and dependent upon the number of applicants, the City Clerk shall have full discretion over the process for council member nominations of applicants, the quantity of nominations council members may make, the ranking of applicants by preference, and the quantity of voting rounds to complete the voting process.

G. Once an applicant is appointed by a majority vote of the total membership of the city council, the applicant shall be sworn-in by the City Clerk.

Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect on the effective date of City of Redlands Ordinance No. 2954.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 2022. ________________________
Mayor, City of Redlands
ATTEST:
____________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 653 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8429 Filling Council Vacancy.docx
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 654 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2954 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Vacancies.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2954
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER 2.02

OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE FILLING OF

VACANCIES ON THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36512 grants authority to the city council to fill vacancies on the city council either by appointment or special election;” and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36512(b) states, “[i]f a vacancy occurs in an elective office provided for in this chapter, the council shall, within 60 days from the commencement of the vacancy, either fill the vacancy by appointment or call a special election to fill the vacancy;” and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36512(b)(1) states, “[i]f the council calls a special election, the special election shall be held on the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days from the call of the special election. A person elected to fill a vacancy holds office for the unexpired term of the former incumbent;” and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36512(b)(2) states, “[i]f the council fills the vacancy by appointment, the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall hold office pursuant to one of the following:
(A) If the vacancy occurs in the first half of a term of office and at least 130 days prior to the next general municipal election, the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall hold office until the next general municipal election that is scheduled 130 or more days after the date the council is notified of the vacancy, and thereafter until the person who is elected at that election to fill the vacancy has been qualified. The person elected to fill the vacancy shall hold office for the unexpired balance of the term of office. (B) If the vacancy occurs in the first half of a term of office, but less than 130 days prior to the next general municipal election, or if the vacancy occurs in the second half of a term of office, the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall hold office for the unexpired term of the former incumbent;” and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36512(c)(1) states that a city may enact an ordinance that “[r]equires that a special election be called immediately to fill every city council vacancy and the office of mayor designated pursuant to Section 34902. The ordinance shall provide that the special election shall be held on the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days from the call of the special election;” and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36512(c)(3) states that a city may enact an ordinance that “[p]rovides that a person appointed to fill a vacancy on the city council holds office only until the date of a special election which shall immediately be called to fill the remainder of the term. The special election may be held on the date of the next regularly established election or regularly scheduled municipal election to be held throughout the city not less than 114 days from the call of the special election;” and Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 655 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2954 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Vacancies.docx WHEREAS, the Government Code does not outline a process for filling a vacancy on the city council by appointment; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to incorporate by reference the requirements of Government Code Section 36512 and authorize the City Council to establish a process for filling a council vacancy by resolution.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Chapter 2.02 of the Redlands Municipal Code, titled “City Council,” is hereby amended to add Section 2.02.060 to read as follows:
“2.02.060: FILLING VACANCIES ON THE CITY COUNCIL
If a vacancy occurs in the office of a member of the city council, the city council may appoint or call a special election in order to fill the city council vacancy, in conformance with the provisions of Government Code Section 36512, as that section may be amended. If the city council decides to fill the vacancy by appointment, the appointment shall be made pursuant to an appointment process set forth in a separate resolution of the city council, which resolution may be amended from time to time.”
Section 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective. To this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable.

Section 3. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
____________________________
Mayor, City of Redlands
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 656 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2954 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Vacancies.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of ___________, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 657 of 728
City Council Meeting L. 1.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 8427
(Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing)
Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 8427 - A request for approval of Street Vacation No. 186 to vacate an excess public right-of-way that is three (3) feet wide and 404 feet in length along the westerly side of Jasper Avenue, and along the eastern property line of the commercial property located at the southwest corner of the Naples Avenue Jasper Avenue intersection (APN: 0298-051-07-0000) (Applicant: Madison Capital Group) (Development Services Director Desatnik) a.

PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.

2. Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.

3. Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public (3 minutes per speaker).

4. 5. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

6. Mayor closes the public hearing.

7. City Council considers the motion and votes.

MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 8427 to vacate the portion of Jasper Avenue along the east property line street frontage of the parcel located at the southwest corner of Naples Avenue and Jasper Avenue.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 658 of 728
RECOMMENDATION:

On October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal to vacate three (3’0”) feet of public right-of-way along the Jasper Avenue frontage and voted 6 to 0 to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1591, and determined the street vacation is in conformance with the 2035 General Plan.

DISCUSSION:

A) Background
The applicant, Madison Capital Group, has filed an application to vacate excess street right-of-way along the entire street frontage of the subject property along Jasper Avenue (see Attachment A – Location Map and Aerial Photo). The proposed area for vacation has dimensions of 3 feet in width and approximately 404 feet in length. The existing street is 66 feet wide (i.e., half-width of 33 feet from street centerline to the property line). The proposal would reduce the street half-width to 30 feet along the subject site’s frontage on Jasper Avenue, consistent with the 30-foot half-width standard for local streets in the City’s General Plan. The legal description and associated exhibit showing the proposed vacation areas is provided Exhibits A and B to Resolution No. 8427.

The project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. On November 15, 2022, the City Council approved entitlements for the development of a 123,456 square-foot self-storage facility consisting of eleven detached buildings, 835 storage units, and a 700 square-foot leasing office with related site improvements on a 6.34-acre parcel. At the same meeting, the Council also adopted a resolution stating the intent to vacate the 3 feet of excess roadway along Jasper Avenue along the project site's frontage.

Jasper Avenue adjacent to the project site is identified as a Local Road in the city's General Plan. With approval of the requested street vacation, the Jasper Avenue right-of-way would become 60 feet wide. The General Plan defines a Local Road as a two-lane street with 60 feet of right-of-way, and the proposal would be consistent with the General Plan. The City’s Land Use Engineering Division has evaluated the proposal and 60 feet of width is acceptable for traffic circulation purposes.

B) Analysis
Pursuant to State law, the City may regulate traffic on its public streets, alleys, and walkways only to the extent expressly authorized. The law permits the City to vacate a street, alley, or walkway upon a finding supported by substantial evidence that the right-of-way is no longer needed for vehicular or pedestrian traffic and is unnecessary for present or prospective use. As previously noted, Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 659 of 728
on November 15, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 8403 (Attachment B) declaring its intent to vacate the subject 3 feet of public right-of-way, which initiated all noticing requirements for the requested street vacation.

C) Environmental Review
The proposed self-storage project with the associated street vacation is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the City prepared an Initial Study to evaluate the required environmental topics. The Initial Study was posted on the State Clearinghouse website, the City's website, and Planning Division office. The 30-day public review and comment period began on August 18, 2022, and ended on September 19, 2022. One comment letter was received from the County Department of Public Works (regarding the need for a County encroachment permit for construction activities) and no other comments were received.

There is no substantial evidence that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines on November 15, 2022. Subsequently, the Notice of Determination for the project was posted with the San Bernardino County Clerk’s office on November 21, 2022. No further environmental review is required.

ALTERNATIVES:

Continue the matter to a subsequent meeting to allow for additional information.

1. 2. Not adopt the Resolution and not approve the requested street vacation.

SUBMITTED BY:

Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Emily Elliott, Contract Planner
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 660 of 728
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 22-23
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. The applicant paid the applicable Planning application fees.

Attachments
Attachment A: Location Map & Aerial Photo
Attachment B: Resolution No. 8403
Attachment C-1: Resolution No. 8427
Attachment C-2: Exhibits A & B (Legal Description and Plat) Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 661 of 728

MENTONE BLVD
N

DEARBORN ST

N WABASH AVE

E COLTON AVE

OPAL AVE

E LUGONIA AVE

DOVER CT

CLAIRE AVE

DAISY CT

C A RMEL CT

VIA NICE

MOSS ST

GRANITE ST

STILLMAN AVE

NARANJO CT VIA PALERMO

VIA FLORENCE

VIA BARCELONA

CARDINAL LN

PADUA AVE

MENLO AVE

GOLD BUCKLE CT

BLACK HAWK CT

MAPLE AVE

EMILIA WAY

RED B RI D
CT

CAMBRIDGE AVE

SUNDOWN CT

NAPLES AVE

FLORENCE AVE

BRIGHTON AVE

SANDY CT

OPAL WAY

BELINDA LN

SIERRA CREST CT

JONI LN
CA
M
B
RIA
CT

SILVER CUP CT

FALCON LN

VALLEY FALLS AVE

FOOTHILL WAY

GOLD CUP CT

VIA RA VEN
N
A

WATERFORD AVE

ALPINE CT

MENDOCINO WAY

N LINCOLN ST

VIA SANREM
O

BLUE WING CT
VIA

ANTIBES

HEATH ST

JASMINE ST

KENSINGTON DR

E BROCKTON AVE

ANTHONY ST

DARLENE CT
MER
C
E
D
S
T
K
N
GI H

TSBRIDGE LN

REVELAT
OI N
W AY

BERYL AVE

TURQUOISE AVE

TOURMALINE AVE
CO
U
N
TRY PL

CAMPUS AVE

CLOCK AVE

NICE AVE

E COLTON AVE

CHRYSOLITE AVE

JASPER AVE
Copyr ight nearm ap 2015
Location Map
OneStop.mxd
0 390 780
Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,
Geographic Information System.

The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or
legal responsibility for the information contained
on this map.

The data used to generate this map is dynamic
in nature, therefore the information shown may
or may not be the most current.

September 26, 2022
.

Project
Site
City of Redlands Mentone
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 662 of 728

N WABASH AVE

NAPLES AVE

CHRYSOLITE AVE

OPAL WAY

ALPINE CT

MENDOCINO WAY

JASPER AVE
Copyright nearmap 2015
Aerial Photo
OneStop.mxd
0 90 180
Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,
Geographic Information System.

The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or
legal responsibility for the information contained
on this map.

The data used to generate this map is dynamic
in nature, therefore the information shown may
or may not be the most current.

September 26, 2022 .

Project
Site
Mentone
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 663 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 664 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 665 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 666 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 667 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 668 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8427 Jasper Ave. Street Vacation 186.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8427

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS FINDING THAT A 3-FOOT WIDE PORTION OF STREET RIGHT OF WAY ALONG JASPER AVENUE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JASPER AVENUE AND NAPLES AVENUE (APN: 0298- 051-07-0000) IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE STREET PURPOSES

AND ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF SAID EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY (CITY OF REDLANDS STREET VACATION NO. 186)
WHEREAS, Madison Capital Group, property owner of the vacant subject property (APN:
0298-051-07-0000) located at the southwest corner of Naples Avenue and Jasper Avenue, has submitted an application requesting the vacation of excess public right-of-way three feet (3’0”) in width and approximately 404 feet in length along the frontage of the property as more specifically described in Exhibit “A”, which is attached hereto and made part hereto (the “Street Vacation”); and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to vacate all or part of a public street easement within the City pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8300 et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8340, the City may, for public convenience and necessity, reserve and except public service easements from the Street Vacation; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on October 5, 2022, as required by Government Code Section 65402, the Planning Commission made a determination that the Street Vacation conforms to the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Redlands adopted Resolution No. 8403 declaring its intention to vacate such portion of Jasper Avenue, and set a public hearing date and time for the proposed Street Vacation; and WHEREAS, the proposed Street Vacation is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines for projects where there is no possibility of any environmental effects; and Recording requested by and
when recorded return to:

CITY CLERK'S OFFICE

CITY OF REDLANDS
P.O. BOX 3005
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 669 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8427 Jasper Ave. Street Vacation 186.docx WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8320, the Redlands City Clerk published notice in the Redlands Daily Facts, for two successive weeks prior to the hearing, and caused the posting of notices along the proposed Street Vacation two weeks prior to the date set for the public hearing, no more than 300 feet apart, with at least three notices posted; and WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Street Vacation and considered all verbal and written testimony provided by City staff and all interested persons.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 8402 on November 15, 2022, for the proposed project certifying and adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, including Street Vacation No. 186.

Section 2. The City Council having elected to proceed under the provisions of Streets and Highways Code Section 8300 et seq., and having held a public hearing as provided therein, finds from all evidence submitted that the Street Vacation is unnecessary for present or prospective public use, and that the public interest and convenience require the Street Vacation.

Section 3. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8340, the City reserves and excepts from the Street Vacation a permanent easement for in-place and future public utility facilities.

Section 4. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 892, the portion of Jasper Avenue (Street Vacation No. 186) to be vacated is not useful as a non-motorized transportation facility.

Section 5. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8325, the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the official records of the county of San Bernardino.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 2022.

Paul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 670 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8427 Jasper Ave. Street Vacation 186.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 671 of 728
4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8427 Jasper Ave. Street Vacation 186.docx EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[Attached]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 672 of 728
5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8427 Jasper Ave. Street Vacation 186.docx EXHIBIT “B”

PLAT MAP
[Attached]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 673 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 674 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 675 of 728
City Council Meeting L. 2.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 8424
(Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing)
Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 8424 - A request for approval of Street Vacation No. 187 to vacate an excess public right-of-way that is four (4) feet wide and 152.91 feet in length along the easterly side of North Church Street, and across the front property line of the residential property located 710 North Church Street (APNs: 0170-071-03-0000 and 0170-071-04-0000) (Michael Frazier, Applicant)
(Development Services Director Desatnik)
a.

PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.

2. Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.

3. Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

Mayor calls upon applicant, or his/her representative, for comments and testimony.

4. Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public (3 minutes per speaker).

5. 6. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

Mayor calls upon the applicant, or representative, for rebuttal comments (5 minutes).

7. 8. Mayor closes the public hearing.

9. City Council considers the motion and votes.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 676 of 728
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 8424 to vacate the portion of North Church Street along the frontage of the property located at 710 North Church Street.

RECOMMENDATION:

On October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal to vacate excess street right-of-way in front of 710 North Church Street and voted 6 to 0 to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1590, and determined the street vacation is in conformance with the 2035 General Plan.

DISCUSSION:

A) Background

The applicant, Michael Frazier, has filed an application to vacate excess street right-of-way in front of 710 North Church Street (see Attachment A-1 – Location Map and Aerial Photo) with dimensions of 4 feet wide and 152.91 feet in length.

The proposed area for vacation contains an existing low retaining wall (approximately up to 4'0" high) and ADA ramp that were built a few years ago to serve the existing property (see Attachment A-2). Currently, the subject property is a Supportive Housing facility serving senior residents (i.e., assisted living facility).

The subject property was previously a group home for boys. According to available street view photographs, an approximately 4'0" high retaining wall, stairs, and wrought iron fence existed at the front of the property (and within the public right-of-way) since at least 2008. Since this property was developed in the 1970s, it is likely that the retaining wall, steps, and wrought iron fence were built much earlier than 2008, although staff was not able to find building permit records on these original improvements. It was likely that the prior owner was unaware that the improvements were constructed within the public right-of-way.

The current property owner purchased the property in 2019 to establish an assisted living facility for seniors (i.e., supportive housing). As required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), senior assisted living facilities are required to provide an ADA-accessible ramp at the front of the property.

Therefore, the applicant constructed the ADA ramp following the fence line established by the previous property owner, not knowing that the area is within public right-of-way.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 677 of 728
The City’s Land Use Engineering Division evaluated the existing conditions, and does not have any concerns regarding the request to vacate four feet (4'0") of public right-of-way so that the ADA ramp and related improvements will be owned and maintained by the property owner (and the City will not be responsible for maintaining the existing improvements). Furthermore, there is already a 6-foot wide sidewalk along the property's frontage on Church Street, and therefore, the City does not need the excess 4'0" wide right-of-way for future public sidewalk purposes.

On November 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 8407 (Attachment B) declaring its intent to vacate the subject 4 feet of public right-of-way, which initiated all noticing requirements for the requested street vacation.

B) Analysis

Pursuant to State law, the City may regulate traffic on its public streets, alleys, and walkways only to the extent expressly authorized. The law permits the City to vacate a street, alley, or walkway upon a finding supported by substantial evidence that the right-of-way is no longer needed for vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and is unnecessary for present or prospective use.

C) Environmental Review

The proposal is exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines for projects where there is no possibility of any significant environmental effects. Adoption of the resolution and vacation of public right-of-way will not result in any potentially significant environmental effects.

ALTERNATIVES:

Continue the matter to a subsequent meeting to allow for additional information.

1. 2. Not adopt the Resolution and not approve the requested street vacation.

SUBMITTED BY:

Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 678 of 728
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
John Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director PREPARED BY:

Catherine Lin, AICP, Principal Planner
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 22-23
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Discussion:

The applicant paid the applicable filing fee for the Street Vacation application.

Approval of this request will not result in any fiscal impact.

Attachments
Attachment A-1: Location Map & Aerial Photo
Attachment A-2: Site Photos
Attachment B: Resolution No. 8407 (Notice of Intention to Vacate) Attachment C-1: City Council Resolution No. 8424
Attachment C-2: Exhibits A & B (Legal Description and Plat) Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 679 of 728

N CHURCH ST

E COLTON AVE BONITA ST
E SUN AVE9TH ST

SYLVAN BLVD

DIVISION ST

CHAPEL ST

OXFORD DR

LOMBARD DR

BERKELEY DR

OCCIDENTAL DR

POST ST
1 1
T
H
S
T

E STUART AVE

STILLMAN AVE

THE TERRACE

COLLEGE AVE
E 10 FRWY

E HIGH AVE
W 10 FRWY
Copyright nearmap 2015
Location Map
Street Vacation
No. 187
OneStop.mxd
0 160 320
Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,
Geographic Information System.

The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or
legal responsibility for the information contained
on this map.

The data used to generate this map is dynamic
in nature, therefore the information shown may
or may not be the most current.

September 15, 2022
.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 680 of 728

N CHURCH ST
Aerial Photo
Street Vacation
No. 187
OneStop.mxd
0 10 20
Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,
Geographic Information System.

The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or
legal responsibility for the information contained
on this map.

The data used to generate this map is dynamic
in nature, therefore the information shown may
or may not be the most current.

September 15, 2022 .

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 681 of 728

SITE PHOTOS
Source: Google Streetview (Feb. 2022)
ADA Ramp
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 682 of 728

SITE PHOTOS
Source: Google Streetview (Feb. 2022)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 683 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 684 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 685 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 686 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 687 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 688 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 689 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8424 Church Street Vacation No. 187.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8424

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS FINDING THAT A 4-FOOT STREET RIGHT OF WAY AT 710 N. CHURCH STREET IS UNNECESSARY

FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING THE

VACATION OF A PORTION OF SAID EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY (CITY OF REDLANDS STREET VACATION NO. 187)
WHEREAS, Mr. Mike Frazier, as agent for the owner of 710 N. Church Street, has submitted an application requesting the vacation of excess public right-of-way, 4 feet in width and approximately 152.91 feet in length along the frontage of the property as more specifically described in Exhibit “A”, which is attached hereto and made part hereto (the “Street Vacation”); and,
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to vacate all or part of a public street easement within the City pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8300 et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8340, the City may, for public convenience and necessity, reserve and except public service easements from the Street Vacation; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on October 5, 2022, as required by Government Code Section 65402, the Planning Commission made a determination that the Street Vacation conforms to the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Redlands adopted Resolution No. 8407, declaring its intention to vacate such portion of N. Church Street, and set a public hearing date and time for the proposed Street Vacation; and WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that the proposed Street Vacation is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines for projects where there is no possibility of any environmental effects; and
Recording requested by and
when recorded return to:

CITY CLERK'S OFFICE

CITY OF REDLANDS
P.O. BOX 3005
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 690 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8424 Church Street Vacation No. 187.docx WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8320, the Redlands City Clerk published notice in the Redlands Daily Facts, for two successive weeks prior to the hearing, and caused the posting of notices along the proposed Street Vacation two weeks prior to the date set for the public hearing, no more than 300 feet apart, with at least three notices posted; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Street Vacation and considered all verbal and written testimony provided by City staff and all interested persons;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS as follows:

Section 1. Approval of the Street Vacation is exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s CEQA Guidelines because, based on the information in the staff report and presented at this hearing, it can be seen with certainty that the approval of the Street Vacation will have no physical effect on the environment.

Section 3. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8340, the City reserves and excepts from the Street Vacation a permanent easement for in-place and future public utility facilities.

Section 4. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 892, the portion of the Street Vacation to be vacated is not useful as a non-motorized transportation facility.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 2022.

Paul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 691 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8424 Church Street Vacation No. 187.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 692 of 728
4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8424 Church Street Vacation No. 187.docx EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[Attached]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 693 of 728
5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8424 Church Street Vacation No. 187.docx EXHIBIT “B”

MAP EXHIBIT
[Attached]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 694 of 728

STREET VACATION

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "A"
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 695 of 728

STREET VACATION
PLAT
EXHIBIT "B"
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 696 of 728
City Council Meeting L. 3.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 8425
(Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing)
Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 8425 - A request to vacate excess public right-of-way along East Highland
Avenue, which is ten (10) feet wide and 998 feet in length, along the southerly side of East Highland Avenue and
approximately 50 feet west of Redlands Street/South Lincoln Street, along the entire frontage of the previously approved Tract Map No. 20065 (APN: 0174-161-25-0000) (Hicks and
Hartwick, Inc., Applicant) (Development Services Director Desatnik)
a.

PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.

2. Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.

3. Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

Mayor calls upon applicant, or his/her representative, for comments and testimony.

4. Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public (3 minutes per speaker).

5. 6. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

Mayor calls upon the applicant, or representative, for rebuttal comments (5 minutes).

7. 8. Mayor closes the public hearing.

9. City Council considers the motion and votes.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 697 of 728
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 8425 to vacate a portion of East Highland Avenue along the frontage of Tract No. 20065.

RECOMMENDATION:

On October 11, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal to vacate a portion of East Highland Ave. along the frontage of Tract No. 20065 and voted 6 to 0 to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1598, and determined the street vacation is in conformance with the 2035 General Plan.

DISCUSSION:

A) Background

The applicant, Hicks and Hartwick, Inc., has filed an application to vacate an unneeded excess portion of public right-of-way across the frontage of Tract Map No. 20065, located on the south side of East Highland Avenue between Redlands Street and Ford Street ( see Attachment A). The project that was previously approved with Commission Review & Approval (CRA) No. 937 will construct a total of 29 new lots and single-family homes on Tract 20065. The project site is currently being graded, and construction of the subdivision has begun. The Final Map for Tract 20065 has been recorded by San Bernardino County, and the Final Map shows that the front boundary of the tract is 40 feet from the centerline of the street (i.e., shown the approved Tract Map but without an approved Street Vacation). A note on the approved Site Plan for Tract 20065 indicates the Street Vacation area (see Attachment B).

East Highland Avenue is the northerly boundary of Tract No. 20065, and currently the front (northerly) property line of Tract 20065 is placed 50 feet from the centerline of East Highland Avenue. However, at this location, the ultimate half-width of Highland Avenue is supposed to be 40 feet from the centerline of the street. For this reason, there exists 10 feet of excess right-of-way along the frontage of Tract No. 20065, which may be determined to be excess public right-of-way (i.e., not needed for roadway purposes or public access) and may be vacated.

Therefore, the applicant has applied for Street Vacation No. 188 to vacate the ten feet (10'0") of excess public right-of-way for East Highland Avenue along the frontage of Tract Map No. 20065, so that the City can achieve the ultimate width Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 698 of 728
of the street at this location and to reconcile the location of the front property line of the new lots to match the recorded Tract Map.

On November 15th, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 8408 (Attachment C) declaring its intent to vacate the subject excess public right-of-way, which initiated all noticing requirements for the requested street vacation.

B) Analysis

C) Environmental Review
The proposal is exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines for projects where there is no possibility of any significant environmental effects. Adoption of the resolution and vacation of public right-of-way will not result in any potentially significant environmental effects.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may:

1. Continue the matter to allow for additional information; or,

2. Not adopt the Resolution and not approve the street vacation.

SUBMITTED BY:

Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
John Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director PREPARED BY:

Catherine Lin, AICP, Principal Planner
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 699 of 728
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 22-23
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Discussion:

The applicant paid the applicable filing fee for the Street Vacation application.

Approval of this request will not result in any fiscal impact.

Attachments
Attachment A: Location Map & Aerial Photo
Attachment B: Site Plan for Tract 20065
Attachment C: Resolution No. 8408 (Notice of Intention to Vacate) Attachment D-1: City Council Resolution No. 8425
Attachment D-2: Exhibits A & B (Legal Description and Plat) Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 700 of 728

N CHURCH ST

JUDSON ST

E HILTON AVE
5TH AVE

N WABASH AVE

E PALM AVE

E CITRUS AVE
N
UNIVER
SIT
Y
S
T

GARDEN ST

E SUNSET DR

CAJON ST

E COLTON AVE
5TH AVE

W HIGHLAND AVE

E REDLANDS BLVD
S
WA
B
A
S
H
AV
E

FORD ST

E CITRUS AVE

FOX CT DAISY CT

KAYE CT

CRAIG CT

FRANK CT

PANSY CT
JADE
CT

PAIGE LN

MARIA CT
11TH ST

GARY LN

YORK ST

LORI CT

COR AL CT

LOTUS AVE

BANYAN DR

ORCHID CT

BRIAN CT

LILAC CT
BOW B

LISA LNSANDY CT

DIVISION ST

CHAPEL ST

JONI LN

RENEE ST

JUNIPER CT

FALCON LN
E 10 FRWY
H
E
M
L
O
CK CT

PRISCILLA

CARVER DR

DRACENA CT

PHLOX AVE

WALNUT AVE

CERO CT

EVERRON CT

JESSE WAY

LIME ST

SPARROW CT
3RD AVE

HERITAGE LN

AMHERST CT

RAMONA DR

AMBER CT

AUBURN CT

LEMON S T

N GROVE ST

CONCORD
LN

CARVERCIR

COOK ST

EL M ST
C
RA
F
T
O
N
CT

COU NTRY RD

E HOME PL
West DR

EAST DR

N LA SALLE ST

KLAMATH ST

STARLIGHT CT

HIGHLAND AVE
S

GROVE ST

BERMUDA DR

WIMB LETON
DR

SOPHI A
CT

POWELL LN S LINCOLN ST
DIAMON
D
CT

MARSHALLST

SYLVAN BLVD

LARAMIE AVE

STILLMAN AVE

E HIGH AVE

W HILTON AVE

VELWOOD DR

SILVERTREE
L
N

UNIVERSITY PL

FARVIEWL
N

CAMBRIDGE AVE

GREENBRIAR CT

CAMELOT DR

E HIGHLAND AVE

PATRICIA
DR

FRANKLIN AVE

ANITA CT

LIDO ST
OAK ST
H AM
PTON
RD
WIL

BA R C IR

FERNDALE CT

ROOSEV ELT RD
LYT
E
L
ST

GEORGIA ST
D
O
L ORE
S
C
T

RYAN ST
W 10 FRWY

S LA SALLE ST

SUNNYPARK
G
A
B
RIE
L
LEWAY
S

ALE M DR

INDEPENDENCE AVE

SHERRIL LN

NAOMI ST

VALENCIA DR
BOWC

DEVONSHIRE DR

CRESTVIEW RD
7TH ST

PR OSPECT DR

CENTRAL AVE

E PARK AVE

COLLEGE AVE

SYLVAN BLVD

PANOR AMA DR

SUMMIT AVE

OPAL AVE
6TH AVE

E COLTON AVE
W
A
L
NUT
ST

CAMPBELL AVE

AR DM ORE CI R
E 10 FRWY
W 10 FRWY

MARION RD

RESERVOIR RD
Copyright nearm ap 2015
Location Map
Street Vacation
No. 188
OneStop.mxd
0 800 1,600
Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,
Geographic Information System.

The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or
legal responsibility for the information contained
on this map.

The data used to generate this map is dynamic
in nature, therefore the information shown may
or may not be the most current.

September 23, 2022
.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 701 of 728
5TH AVE

PINEWOOD CT

KENWOOD DR

REDLANDS ST
E

HIGHLAN
D
AV
E
Copyright nearmap 2015
Aerial Photo
Street Vacation
No. 188
OneStop.mxd
0 80 160
Feet
Scale
This map was produced by the City of Redlands,
Geographic Information System.

The City of Redlands assumes no warranty or
legal responsibility for the information contained
on this map.

The data used to generate this map is dynamic
in nature, therefore the information shown may
or may not be the most current.

September 26, 2022 .

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 702 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 703 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 704 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 705 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 706 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 707 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 708 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 709 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8425 Street Vacation 188 East Highland.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8425

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS FINDING THAT A 10-FOOT WIDE PORTION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ON EAST HIGHLAND AVENUE ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF TRACT NO. 20065 IS UNNECESSARY FOR

PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING THE VACATION

OF A PORTION OF SAID EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY (CITY OF REDLANDS STREET VACATION NO. 188)
WHEREAS, Hicks & Hartwick, Inc., authorized representative, has submitted an application requesting vacation of the excess street right of way along East Highland Avenue that is ten (10) feet wide and 998 feet in length, along the south side of East Highland Avenue and approximately 50 feet west of South Lincoln Avenue/Redlands Street, along the entire frontage of the previously approved Tract Map No. 20065 (APN: 0174-161-25-0000), as more specifically described in Exhibit “A”, which is attached hereto and made part hereto (the “Street Vacation”); and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to vacate all or part of a public street easement within the City pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8300 et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8340, the City may, for public convenience and necessity, reserve and except public service easements from the Street Vacation; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on October 11, 2022, as required by Government Code Section 65402, the Planning Commission made a determination that the Street Vacation conforms to the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Redlands adopted Resolution No. 8408 declaring its intention to vacate such portion of East Highland Avenue, and set a public hearing date and time for the proposed Street Vacation; and WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that the proposed Street Vacation is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines for projects where there is no possibility of any environmental effects; and
Recording requested by and
when recorded return to:

CITY CLERK'S OFFICE

CITY OF REDLANDS
P.O. BOX 3005
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 710 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8425 Street Vacation 188 East Highland.docx WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8320, the Redlands City Clerk published notice in the Redlands Daily Facts, for two successive weeks prior to the hearing, and caused the posting of notices along the proposed Street Vacation two weeks prior to the date set for the public hearing, no more than 300 feet apart, with at least three notices posted; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Street Vacation and considered all verbal and written testimony provided by City staff and all interested persons.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 3. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8340, the City reserves and excepts from the Street Vacation a permanent easement for in-place and future public utility facilities.

Section 4. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 892, the portion of the Street Vacation to be vacated is not useful as a non-motorized transportation facility.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 2022.

Paul T. Barich, Mayor
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 711 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8425 Street Vacation 188 East Highland.docx ATTEST:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 712 of 728
4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8425 Street Vacation 188 East Highland.docx EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[Attached]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 713 of 728
5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8425 Street Vacation 188 East Highland.docx EXHIBIT “B”

PLAT MAP
[Attached]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 714 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 715 of 728
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 716 of 728
City Council Meeting M. 1.

DATE: 12/20/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of Ordinance No. 2953 changing Chapter 2.02 of the Redlands Municipal Code relating to the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, their respective terms of office, and adoption of Resolution No. 8414 (Council Member Davis)
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

Mayor requests the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 2953.

I move to waive further reading of, and to introduce Ordinance No. 2953.

1. 2. I move to adopt Resolution No. 8414.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends adoption of Ordinance No. 2953, and Resolution No. 8414.

DISCUSSION:

At the December 6, 2022, City Council Meeting, Council Member Davis proposed an alternative method for the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, and the length of their respective terms. Council Member Davis' proposal outlined a 1-year seniority-based rotation with the most senior Council Member becoming Mayor, and the 2nd most senior serving as Mayor Pro Tem.

At the end of the 1-year term, the Mayor Pro Tem would then rotate into the role of Mayor. Included in the proposal was an "opt-out" clause allowing a Council Member to decline serving as Mayor.

City Council moved to direct staff to bring forth changes to the City's Municipal Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 717 of 728
City Council moved to direct staff to bring forth changes to the City's Municipal Code as it pertains to the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem.

Ordinance No. 2953 removes language concerning the selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore and their terms of office from the municipal code.

Resolution No. 8414 replaces the previous selection process, describes the seniority based rotation, and will take effect on the effective date of Ordinance No. 2953.

SUBMITTED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager
Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Attachments
Resolution No. 8414
Ordinance No. 2953 Legislative
Ordinance No. 2953 Clean
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 718 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8414 Selection of Mayor Mayor Pro Tem.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8414

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

ESTABLISHING THE PROCESS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE MAYOR

AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE AND THEIR RESPECTIVE TERMS OF
OFFICE
WHEREAS, Section 2.02.020 of the Redlands Municipal Code, titled “Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore; Terms of Office,” presently establishes a process whereby the City’s Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are selected, individually, by their colleagues of the City Council for a two-year term; and
WHEREAS, the process for the selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore has been codified in the Redlands Municipal Code, without substantive change for more than 35 years, since 1985 and, in uncodified ordinance form, without substantive change, since 1955; and WHEREAS, this Resolution relating to the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore is the first substantive governmental business action taken by the City Council during this century when the residents of Redlands are fully represented by their respective selection of five individuals, from five council member districts; and
WHEREAS, because this is a historic time for Redlands and its City Council, this City Council believes the first action taken by the City Council should be one of unanimity, reflecting the Council members acting as a whole without regard to the districts they were selected from; and one of vision, choosing its leadership not only now for the following year, but also for, the next four years for continuity and good government purposes; and WHEREAS, the process established by this Resolution is transparent, open, and performed in a manner which avoids randomness or adherence to numbers or labels, and instead provides certainty; and
WHEREAS, the process established by this Resolution ensures that each City Council member voting on this Resolution who has not yet had an opportunity to serve as the Mayor of Redlands is given that opportunity; and
WHEREAS, the process established by this Resolution recognizes the natural hierarchal ascension of officers in governmental and non-governmental organizations, and private business entities; and further takes advantage of Council member wisdom gained through experience in the ascension to the role of Mayor; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has decided to change the process for the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore and will hold a first reading of, and introduce, Ordinance No. 2953 to amend section 2.02.020 of the Redlands Municipal Code relating to such process for purposes of efficiency, and to promulgate good government practices as stated herein; Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 719 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8414 Selection of Mayor Mayor Pro Tem.docx

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section1. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore shall be chosen by the City Council December of each calendar year upon the affirmative vote of the majority of the total membership of the City Council. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore serve at the pleasure of the City Council.

Section 2. At its regular meeting in December 2023, the selection of a Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore shall be determined by seniority based on a Council Member’s continuous length of service on the City Council without having served as Mayor. The Council Member with the longest continuous service on the City Council without having served as Mayor shall be appointed to serve as Mayor. The Council Member with the second longest continuous length of service on the City Council without having served as Mayor shall be appointed to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore. In the event two or more Council Members have equal seniority based upon their continuous length of service on the City Council without having served as Mayor, the Council Member with the higher vote count in his or her most recent election is considered to have higher seniority and shall be selected Mayor. The Council Member with the second highest vote count in his or her most recent election is considered to have the second highest seniority and shall be selected Mayor Pro Tempore.

Section 3. At its regular meeting in December 2024, the current Mayor Pro Tempore shall automatically succeed to the position of Mayor. The Council Member with the next longest continuous service on the City Council who has not yet served as Mayor shall be selected as Mayor Pro Tempore. Council Members having equal seniority shall be selected in the same manner as set forth in Section 2.

Section 4. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore shall hold office from the date of their selection, until their identified successors take office or their successors are chosen. In the event a Council Member resigns from the position of Mayor or resigns from the City Council, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall automatically succeed to the position of Mayor. In the event a Council Member resigns from the position of Mayor Pro Tempore or resigns from the City Council, the position of Mayor Pro Tempore shall be filled in the same manner as set forth in Section 2.

Section 5. A Council Member may decline the position of Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore. In that event, priority shall be given to the next most senior Council Member based on his or her length of service on the City Council without having served as Mayor.

Section 6. In the event that application of these rules would result in no Council Member being eligible to fill either the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore position, then the City Council may vote to appoint any one of its members to serve.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 720 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8414 Selection of Mayor Mayor Pro Tem.docx Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect on the effective date of City of Redlands Ordinance No. 2953.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 2022. ________________________
Mayor, City of Redlands
ATTEST:
____________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 721 of 728
4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8414 Selection of Mayor Mayor Pro Tem.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 722 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2953 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Legislative.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2953
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER 2.02

OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE SELECTION

OF THE MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE AND THEIR RESPECTIVE

TERMS OF OFFICE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Chapter 2.02 of the Redlands Municipal Code, titled “City Council,” is hereby amended to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 2.02

CITY COUNCIL
SECTION:

2.02.010: Time and Place of Meetings

2.02.020: Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore; Terms of Office

2.02.030: Compensation; Schedule

2.02.040: Compensation; Determination of Population

2.02.050: Compensation; Increase Procedure

2.02.010: TIME AND PLACE OF MEETINGS:

The time for holding the regular meetings of the city council shall be the first and third Tuesday of each month at five o'clock (5:00) P.M. in the council chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, Suite 2, Redlands, California. If any such regular meeting falls on a legal holiday, the meeting shall be held on the next city business day.

2.02.020: SELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE; TERMS OF OFFICE:

A. The city council shall meet after each general municipal election and choose one of its members as mayor, and one of its members as mayor pro tempore . The terms of office of the mayor and mayor pro tempore shall be for two (2) years, except as provided in subsection B of this section. pursuant to a process set forth in a separate resolution of the city council, which resolution may be amended from time to time B. In the event the terms of the council members are shortened or extended, as a result of any change in the election date for city council members, the terms of the mayor and mayor pro tempore shall be correspondingly shortened or, in the case of an extension of the council members' terms, the city council shall meet and select one of its members to serve as mayor and one of its members to serve as mayor pro tempore for the period of time the council members' terms are extended until the next municipal election.

C. The mayor and mayor pro tempore shall hold office from the date of their selection and until their successors are chosen.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 723 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2953 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Legislative.docx

2.02.030: COMPENSATION; SCHEDULE:

Members of the city council shall be compensated according to the following schedule:

A. When the population of Redlands is up to and including thirty five thousand (35,000) in population, three hundred dollars ($300.00) per month;
B. When the population of Redlands is over thirty five thousand (35,000) up to and including fifty thousand (50,000) in population, four hundred dollars ($400.00) per month; C. When the population of Redlands is over fifty thousand (50,000) up to and including seventy five thousand (75,000) in population, five hundred dollars ($500.00) per month; D. When the population of Redlands is over seventy five thousand (75,000) up to and including one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) in population, six hundred dollars ($600.00) per month.

2.02.040: COMPENSATION; DETERMINATION OF POPULATION:

For the purposes of sections 2.02.030 through 2.02.050 of this chapter, the population of the city shall be determined either by the last preceding federal census, or by any subsequent census, or by an estimate validated by the state of California department of finance.

2.02.050: COMPENSATION; INCREASE PROCEDURE:

A. The compensation of city council members may be increased beyond the amount provided in section 2.02.030 of this chapter by an ordinance, or by an amendment to an ordinance, but the amount of the increase may not exceed an amount equal to five percent (5%) for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in effect when the ordinance, or ordinance amendment, is enacted. No salary ordinance shall be enacted or amended which provides for automatic future increases in salary.

B. Pursuant to City of Redlands Ordinance No. 2886 adopted in accordance with this section 2.02.030, and notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the compensation of city council members shall be fourteen hundred dollars ($1,400.00) per month, commencing with the first full City pay period after January 1, 2023.

Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in the Redlands Daily Facts, a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
________________________________
Mayor, City of Redlands
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 724 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2953 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Legislative.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of ___________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 725 of 728
1 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2953 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Clean.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2953
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER 2.02

OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE SELECTION

OF THE MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE AND THEIR RESPECTIVE

TERMS OF OFFICE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Chapter 2.02 of the Redlands Municipal Code, titled “City Council,” is hereby amended to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 2.02

CITY COUNCIL
SECTION:

2.02.010: Time and Place of Meetings

2.02.020: Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore; Terms of Office

2.02.030: Compensation; Schedule

2.02.040: Compensation; Determination of Population

2.02.050: Compensation; Increase Procedure

2.02.010: TIME AND PLACE OF MEETINGS:

2.02.020: SELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE; TERMS OF OFFICE:

The city council shall choose one of its members as mayor, and one of its members as mayor pro tempore pursuant to a process set forth in a separate resolution of the city council, which resolution may be amended from time to time

2.02.030: COMPENSATION; SCHEDULE:

Members of the city council shall be compensated according to the following schedule:

A. When the population of Redlands is up to and including thirty five thousand (35,000) in population, three hundred dollars ($300.00) per month;
B. When the population of Redlands is over thirty five thousand (35,000) up to and including fifty thousand (50,000) in population, four hundred dollars ($400.00) per month; C. When the population of Redlands is over fifty thousand (50,000) up to and including seventy five thousand (75,000) in population, five hundred dollars ($500.00) per month; Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 726 of 728
2 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2953 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Clean.docx D. When the population of Redlands is over seventy five thousand (75,000) up to and including one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) in population, six hundred dollars ($600.00) per month.

2.02.040: COMPENSATION; DETERMINATION OF POPULATION:

2.02.050: COMPENSATION; INCREASE PROCEDURE:

Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
________________________________
Mayor, City of Redlands
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 727 of 728
3 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2953 Amending Chapter 2.02 City Council Clean.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of ___________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 12/20/22 728 of 728

Redlands City CouncilDecember 20, 2022

Redlands City Council
December 20, 2022