Redlands City Council
May 2, 2023

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM

1. Project Title: Demolition No. 357

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Mailing Address:

City of Redlands City of Redlands
Development Services Department Development Services Dept. – Planning 35 Cajon Street, Suite 20 P.O. Box 3005
Redlands, CA 92373 Redlands, CA 92373

3. Contact Person & Telephone: Sean Reilly, Principal Planner, (909) 798-7555 option 2.

4. Project Location: 130 Sierra Vista, Redlands, CA (Assessor Parcel Number: 0176-173-09-0000)

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:

Bryan and Celina McKernan
130 Sierra Vista Drive
Redlands, Ca 92373

6. General Plan Designation: Very Low Density Residential

7. Zoning Designation: Residential Estate (R-A)

8. Description of Project:

The applicant, Bryan and Celina McKernan, proposes to demolish an existing single family residence that is approximately 2,712 square feet. As a part of the project all of the structures would be removed from the property. The structure is over 50 years of age and is located at 130 Sierra Vista within the Residential Estate (R-A) District.

9. Existing On-site Land Use and Setting: The property is located at the intersection of Escondido Road and Sierra Vista Drive. The property has been improved with a single family residence, and attached garage.

10. Surrounding General Plan and Land Uses:

General Plan Zoning Land Use
North: Very Low Density Residential Residential
Estate (R-A)
Single Family Residence
South: Very Low Density Residential Residential
Estate (R-A)
Single Family Residence
West: Very Low Density Residential Residential
Estate (R-A)
Single Family Residence
East: Very Low Density Residential Residential
Estate (R-A)
Single Family Residence

11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 464 of 546

12. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun?
Not Applicable. This Preliminary Environmental Checklist is being prepared to augment a potential finding of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section(s) 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Greenhouse Gas Emissions Public Services
Agriculture & Forestry
Resources
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Recreation
Air Quality Hydrology/Water Quality Transportation
Biological Resources Land Use & Planning Tribal Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mineral Resources Utilities & Service Systems Energy Noise Wildfire
Geology and Soils Population & Housing Mandatory Findings of Significance
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:
() I find that the Proposed Project could not have a potentially significant effect on the environment, and the Proposed Project qualifies for an EXEMPTION from further environmental review. ( ) I find that the Proposed Project could not have a potentially significant effect on the environment.

A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 465 of 546

( ) I find that although the Proposed Project could not have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Proposed Project. No further review is required. ________________________
Sean Reilly, Principal Planner
City of Redlands
January 17, 2023
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 466 of 546

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all determinations, except "No Impact" determinations that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" determination is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" determination should be explained where it is based on projectspecific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All determinations and discussion must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be potentially significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries in any section of this Initial Study, then an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared to fully analyze the identified issue(s).
4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D)). In such cases, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For any effects that are determined to be “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist any and all references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., General Plan maps or exhibits, zoning ordinances, specific plans, etc.). Reference to a previously-prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. In this Initial Study, a References section is provided at the end of the document.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats. However, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and, b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 467 of 546

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
I. AESTHETICS.

Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Aesthetics – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on a scenic vista or scenic highway. The proposed project is the demolition of a single family residence which is not located within a scenic vista or along a scenic highway. b) No Impact. The proposed demolition of a single family residence will not damage scenic resources, including trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a state scenic highway. The property is not located along a state scenic highway and the building itself is not historic or located within a historic or scenic district. There are no known rock outcroppings on-site.
c) No Impact. The proposed project will not degrade the existing visual character or affect the quality of the site and its surroundings. The demolition of the single family residence would not create a change in the appearance of the surroundings. The project is a demolition which will remove a structure from a property which is not particularly visible from the adjacent surroundings. Overall, the demolition of the single-family residence would not substantially degrade the existing visual character of the area.
d) No Impact. The proposed project is a demolition and it will not create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

Lighting and glare will be reduced because of the demolition and removal of the structure onsite.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 468 of 546

Agriculture & Forest Resources – Discussion
a) No Impact. The project includes the demolition of a single family residence. The property does not include Prime Farmland and the demolition of the single family residence will not convert Prime Farmland or Unique Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use.

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
II. AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES.

In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. In determining whether
impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may
refer to information compiled by the California
Department of Forestry & Fire Protection regarding
the state’s inventory of forest land, including the
Forest and Range Assessment Project and the
Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest
carbon measurement methodology provided in
Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air
Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act contract.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g)?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 469 of 546

b) No Impact. The demolition will not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. The property is within a developed residential area in a residential zoning district. The demolition does not include any proposal to change the zoning district nor is the property under the Williamson Act contract.
c) No Impact. This demolition is located in an area that is zoned for residential development.

The property does not contain any forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production. As such, removal of the structures on the property will not create an impact on forest land or timberland.
d) No Impact. The demolition will not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use, as the property does not contain any forest land or propose the conversion of any forest land to non-forest use.
e) No Impact. This demolition is located in an area surrounded by a single family residences and the demolition of the home on the property would not result in the conversion of any farmland or forest area. Therefore, no impacts will occur related to agriculture or forest resources.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 470 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
III. AIR QUALITY.

Where available, the significance criteria established
by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make
the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
Air Quality – Discussion
a, b) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. The proposed project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.
d) No Impact. The proposed project will not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Additionally, the demolition process shall comply with Chapter 15.44 of the Redlands Municipal Code which regulates the demolition of structures. e) No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Additionally, the demolition process shall comply with Chapter 15.44 of the Redlands Municipal Code which regulates the demolition of structures.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 471 of 546

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish & Wildlife or U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish & Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Biological Resources – Discussion
a) No Impact. The property is located within an urbanized area and the project scope is limited to the demolition of the existing residential structure. This demolition will not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications. All work completed will be required to adhere to all local, State, and Federal laws.

b) No Impact. There are no riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities within the project area and no disturbance beyond the limits of the subject property is proposed. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. No protected wetlands exist within the subject property.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 472 of 546

d) No Impact. The project includes the demolition of an existing single family residence, and related improvements that have been previously developed and will not interfere substantially with the movement of any native residential or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.
e) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. f) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single-family home and it will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 473 of 546

Cultural Resources – Discussion
a) Less than Significant Impact. The historical significance of the project has been reviewed pursuant to the findings of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852) which are as follow.

The analysis in this section is based upon City staff’s research and the research and analysis contained with the Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) prepared by Historic Resources Group dated January 2023. The HRE was prepared using primary and secondary sources related to the history and development of the property, including reference materials available at the A.K.

Smiley Public Library in Redlands and field inspection of the property. Identification of physical features and historic integrity were ascertained during the site visit and through review of available building plans and other archival materials.

A. Associated with events have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California History and cultural heritage.

Permits were issued for construction of the home in 1958 and aerial images verify that the structure was constructed as of 1959. The home is a modest example of the postWorld War II housing boom in the city, when large swaths of Redlands were developed as housing tracts and developments. It is one of over 3,700 residences built during this decade and was not associated with an early or notable tract development. As such, the building does not have significant interest as part of the development of Redlands. A comprehensive newspaper search and research conducted at the A.K. Smiley Library’s Heritage Room by City staff did not reveal any evidence that this structure makes a Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 474 of 546

significant contribution to the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, State, or Country.

B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.

Staff conducted research at the A.K. Smiley Library Heritage Room and through newspaper.com. The table (as shown below) lists the residents associated to the subject property based on the information provided by the City Directories located at the A.K. Smiley Library’s Heritage Room and Newspapers.com.

The newspaper research that was conducted for each of these individuals revealed no significant information. The individuals listed above had professional occupations and are not known to have significantly contributed to the culture, history or development of the city and further, the information found related to these individuals was not closely tied to this specific home.

As previously stated, the home was designed by notable Redlands architect Clare Day.

Clare Day is known for his Mid-Century Modern style of design for residential, commercial and institutional buildings. Some of his contributions to the local area include Clement Middle school, Redlands Paint on Redlands Blvd., Cram Elementary School in Highland, and several homes within the south hills of Redlands. While the home was designed by Clare Day, it is not one of his more notable works. In addition, while Clare Day is a notable local architect, he would not be someone who is considered to have significantly contributed to the culture, history or development of the City.

C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.

Please refer to the response provided under Section 2.62.170(D), above.

D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information in prehistory or history.

There are several homes with Mid-Century Modern architecture in the City of Redlands.

Although this home may not be one of the few remaining homes in the City of this architectural type, it is one of approximately 13 homes in Redlands designed by Clare Day. At the time of its initial construction, the residence exhibited significant characterdefining features of the Mid-Century Modern style and reflected Day’s work as an Year Name(s) Occupation
1959-1971 Robert Baker Interior Designer
1975 - 1998 Paul R. Ennis Doctor
2003 - 2008 Rick Pence Construction Contractor
2008 - 2018 Gregory Misbach Doctor
2018 - Present Celina and Bryan McKernan Construction Contractor Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 475 of 546

important local architect. However, the building has undergone substantial alterations since its original construction, including relocation of the primary entrance, replacement of most windows and doors, enclosure of the original carport, replacement of some original siding, and re-cladding of the prominent exterior fireplace. Because of these alterations the property is no longer an excellent example of the Mid-Century Modern style nor an important example of Clare Henry Day’s work. Day was extremely active in Redlands in the 1950s and 1960s, and there are many houses still extant with higher integrity in the City that better reflect his significance as a local architect. The home does not retain sufficient integrity to convey any potential significance under this criterion.

Based on the review of the criteria above as it relates to the demolition of the structure, it is not historically significant and approval of the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 further, there is no evidence that the site is likely to yield valuable information regarding pre-history.
b) No Impact. The building and site have not yielded any information regarding prehistory or history. The building will not likely yield information about the past. Therefore, approval of the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5.
c) No Impact. The proposed project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site, or unique geologic feature as significant ground disturbance is not proposed. d) No Impact. The proposed project will not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 476 of 546

Energy – Discussion
a) No Impact. The project is the demolition of a single-family residence. The demolition and removal of the structure of the residential structure would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. The Project would therefore not cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy conservations goals within the State of California. Therefore, no impact would occur in relation to this issue. b) No Impact. Redlands Municipal Code Chapter 15.18 requires that all new development projects (e.g., commercial, industrial, residential, etc.) comply with the California Green Building Standards, Title 24, Part 11 (known as CalGreen). However, the proposed project does not include the construction. The demolition of on single-family residence will not conflict with or obstruct any State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. There will be no impact.

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
VI. ENERGY.

Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 477 of 546

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
VII. GEOLOGY & SOILS.

Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology,
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in onor off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of wastewater?
Geology & Soils – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project is a demolition and will remove a structure from the site. It will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault; Strong seismic ground shaking; Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; and, landslides. b) No Impact. Disturbance within the project site will be limited to the immediate location surrounding the home and the site is not being cleared or graded as a result of this project.

The proposed project will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 478 of 546

d) No Impact. Adoption of the proposed project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property.
e) No Impact. The proposed project does not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water. The project is a demolition of a single-family home, which is not currently utilizing sewer service and septic is in place on-site.

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the
project:
a) Generate gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on
the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project will not generate gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
b) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 479 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
IX. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Hazards & Hazardous Materials – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, a demolition application shall be submitted to the City of Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 480 of 546

Redlands Building and Safety Division for approval per the regulations set forth in the California Building Code. Additionally, the demolition process shall comply with Chapter

15.44 of the Redlands Municipal Code which regulates the demolition of structures and the abatement of hazardous materials.
b) No Impact. The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Additionally, the demolition process shall comply with Chapter 15.44 of the Redlands Municipal Code which regulates the demolition of structures and the abatement of hazardous materials. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. The nearest public school is Mariposa Elementary School, which is approximately one mile from the proposed project. The demolition process will be required to comply with Chapter 15.44 of the Redlands Municipal Code which regulates the demolition of structures and the abatement of hazardous materials.
d) No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. This was verified by the Envirostor and GeoTracker database, as a result, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
e - f) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single-family residence which is not located within the immediate vicinity of a public or private airstrip. Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. The project is not located in an airport land use plan.
g) No Impact. The project is the demolition of a single-family residence on an existing lot adjacent to established roadways. The proposed project will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
h) No Impact. The proposed project is a demolition which will remove structured from the property. Any new construction will be required to obtain permits and will be review for consistency with existing Building, Fire and Municipal Codes. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 481 of 546

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
X. HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY. Would
the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned
uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 482 of 546

Hydrology & Water Quality – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single family residence. No discharge will be created due to the removal of the structures onsite. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. b) No Impact. The project consists of demolishing a single-family residence, and is not expected to utilize groundwater supplies. The proposed project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. c) No Impact. The project is the demolition of a single family residence. The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or offsite. d) No Impact. The proposed project is a demolition and will remove impervious surface area from the site. This should result in a reduction in the amount of runoff from the site. The proposed project will not create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
g) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single-family residence and does not propose any new housing. The proposed project will not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. The proposed project will not place within a 100- year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows. h) No Impact. The proposed project is the removal of a structure, and it will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.
f) No Impact. The project is not located in an area subject to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact will occur.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 483 of 546

Land Use & Planning – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project will remove an existing structure from the site but will not change the property boundaries.
b) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the zoning ordinance or general plan or other applicable land use plan as it only consists of the demolition of an existing single family dwelling.
c) No Impact. The proposed demolition of the single family residence does not conflict with any conservation or natural community plan as it located in an urban area.

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XI. LAND USE & PLANNING.

Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
c) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy,
or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over
the project (including, but not limited to, the
general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 484 of 546

Mineral Resources – Discussion
a) No Impact. The removal of the structures on-site will not change the availability of mineral resources and the project is not located near a mineral resource recovery area. No impact will occur related to these issues.
b) No Impact. The removal of the structures will not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral source as delineated on a local general plan, or specific plan.

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 485 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XIII. NOISE. Would the project:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive ground borne vibration or ground
borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Noise – Discussion
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. The proposed project will not result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels.
b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Project will be required to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. c) No Impact. The project is located approximately 4.00 south of the Redlands Municipal Airport.

The proposed project is a demolition of a single family residence. This demolition would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels within the vicinity of an airport.
d) No Impact. The proposed project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The proposed project is the demolition of a small building structure. This demolition would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 486 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XIV. POPULATION & HOUSING.

Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of road or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Population & Housing – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single-family residence. No extension of infrastructure is proposed by this project and no population growth is anticipated.
b) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of one single-family residence. The demolition would not result in the displacement of substantial existing housing that would require the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in the displacement of a substantial number of people that would require the construction of a replacement housing.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 487 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES.

Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of
the public services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
Public Services – Discussion
a) i) and ii) No Impact. Police and fire protection for the project site are provided by the City of Redlands. Calls for service are not expected to result from the demolition of the home. The proposed project will not result in the need for new or additional public facilities such as Police or Fire stations, vehicles, or additional staff as it is the removal of a structure and does not include the addition construction any new facility that could contribute to a significant increase in police or fire calls for service. No impact is anticipated in relation to this issue. iii), iv), and v) No Impacts. The proposed project is not expected to impact or result in a need for new or altered general governmental services provided by the City of Redlands, the Redlands Unified School District, or other government agencies. The proposed project is a demolition and will result in the removal of a single-family residence from the property. It will not result in the need for new or additional public facilities such as public libraries, parks, or meeting facilities. The project does not induce significant residential growth requiring additional school facilities, nor will it directly generate the need for new additional park land. In terms of cumulative effects, the proposed project would not create any public services or facilities issues beyond that anticipated in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, no impacts will occur related to these issues.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 488 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XVI. RECREATION.

Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
Recreation – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single-family residence. The removal of the structure on this site will not contribute to an increased demand for recreational facilities.
b) No Impact. The project will not affect existing or planned recreational facilities, nor create a significant new demand for additional recreational facilities.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 489 of 546

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XVII. TRANSPORTATION.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or
policy establishing measures of effectiveness
for the performance of the circulation system,
taking into account all modes of transportation
including mass transit and non-motorized
travel and relevant components of the
circulation system, including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but not
limited to level of service standards and travel
demand measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels or
a change in location that result in substantial
safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the
performance or safety of such facilities?
Transportation – Discussion
a-f) No Impact. The proposed project is the demolition of a single-family residence. The removal of these structures would not create additional vehicle trips, or result in changes to vehicle circulation patterns, emergency access, and transit facilities. The demolition of the single-family residence and accessory structures will not conflict with congestion on any major roads or highways or conflict with any applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of circulation systems.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 490 of 546

Tribal Cultural Resources – Discussion
a) No Impact. The subject site was initially developed as a single-family residence, which is proposed for demolition. No subsurface activities will occur as a result of the demolition of the structures on-site, beyond the removal of slabs and foundations. Grading of the site is not proposed in the scope of this demolition.

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native American tribe,
and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k); or,
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 491 of 546

Utilities & Service Systems – Discussion
a) No Impact. The demolition of the single-family residence will not result in an increase in waste water treatment because no new building is proposed as a part of this project that would require waste water treatment.
b, c) No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of a new water or wastewater treatment facility which could cause significant environmental effects. The proposed project is the demolition and removal of an existing single-family home and it will not require the construction of storm water drainage facilities which could cause significant environmental effects. d) No Impact. The demolition of the existing single-family residence will not result in the need for additional water supplies.
e) No Impact. The demolition of the existing single-family residence will not result in an additional demand for wastewater treatment by its provider.

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XIX. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS.

Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of
the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 492 of 546

f) No Impact. The proposed demolition of one single-family residence will not generate waste that will exceed the capacity of the landfill.
g) No Impact. The proposed demolition will require the issuance of building permit, issued by the Development Services Department. As a part of permit issuance, compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste is required.

Wildfire – Discussion
a, b, c, d) No Impact. The proposed project is a demolition, which will remove a structure from the project location. Any future construction on the site would be required to comply with the California Building Code and the Redlands Municipal Code. Therefore, there will be no impacts.

Issues: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XX. WILDFIRE.

If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the Project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 493 of 546

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 494 of 546

Mandatory Findings of Significance – Discussion
a) No Impact. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b) No Impact. The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
c) No Impact. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

Issues:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 495 of 546

REFERENCES
California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. Available online at:
http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html
California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection (2016). San Bernardino County Williamson Act FW 2015/2016 Sheet 2 of 2.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. EnviroStor Database. Available online at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available online at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/ CalRecycle. Facility/Site Summary Details: San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill (36-AA-0087). Available online at:
http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/36-AA-0087/Detail/ City of Redlands (2017, December 5). City of Redlands Climate Action Plan. Available online at:
https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/planning-division-general-plan City of Redlands (2017, December 5). City of Redlands 2035 General Plan. Available online at:
https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/planning-division-general-plan City of Redlands (2017, July 21). City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2016081041). Available online at:
https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/planning-division-general-plan City of Redlands (1989, January 3). East Valley Corridor Specific Plan (January 3, 1989, and as amended).

Available online at: https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/specific-plans-and-community-plans California State Geoportal. “California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer.” 2020. https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/789d5286736248f69c4515c04f58f414 Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Envirostor.”
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=Redlands Historic Resources Group. Historical Resource Evaluation Report Baker Residence, 130 Sierra Vista Drive, Redlands (January 2023)
State Water Resources Control Board. “Geotracker.” Accessed 24 August 2021. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100096 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “National Wetlands Inventory.” 8 March 2021. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 496 of 546
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 497 of 546
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 498 of 546
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8471 Uphold Appeal of Demolition No. 357 - 130 Sierra Vista.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8471

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF THE HISTORIC AND SCENIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION’S TO DENY DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 357 AND APPROVING DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 357
WHEREAS, Brian McKernan, property owner, has submitted an application for Demolition Permit No. 357 to demolish a 2,794 square-foot single-family residential dwelling located at 130 Sierra Vista within the Estate Residential (R-A) zone (APN: 0176-173-09-0000); and
WHEREAS, notice of the February 2, 2023, Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission public hearing for Demolition No. 357 was mailed to the owners of record of all properties within 300 feet of the subject property by the Secretary to the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission; and
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission held a public hearing and considered the staff report, oral report, the testimony and the written evidence submitted by and on behalf of the applicant and by members of the public; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission Continued the Demolition No. 357 to an unspecified date; and WHEREAS, notice of the April 6, 2023, Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission public hearing was mailed to the owners of record of all properties within 300 feet of the subject property; and

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission held a public hearing and considered the staff report, oral report, the testimony and the written evidence submitted by and on behalf of the applicant and by members of the public; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing on April 6, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission found:
a) Although a structure may not retain sufficient integrity to meet the criteria for listing in the National Register, it can still be eligible for listing in the California Register, per California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 11.5, Section 4852(c); and
b) Despite the alterations that have been made to the Baker residence, the residence still retains sufficient integrity, such that it is an eligible historic resource under the California Register guidelines; and
c) The demolition of the Baker residence would significantly alter an historic resource; and
WHEREAS, Brian and Celina McKernan (“Appellant”), has filed a timely application on April 10, 2023, to appeal the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s decision to deny Demolition Permit No. 357; and
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 499 of 546
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8471 Uphold Appeal of Demolition No. 357 - 130 Sierra Vista.docx WHEREAS, on May 2, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Appeal of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s decision to deny Demolition Permit No. 357, and considered the findings and analysis of the Historic Resource Evaluation report, as modified, prepared by Historic Resources Group, the peer review report prepared by ECORP, the verbal and written testimony of City Staff, the applicant and public comments from members of the public.

WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) provides for exemption the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the project qualifies for this exemption; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Resources Evaluation report found that the following alterations to character defining features of the Baker residence have been made to the original structure:
a) Replacement of original ballast roof with membrane roofing b) Reconfiguration of the primary east façade
c) Enclosure of the original carport
d) Enclosure of the original recessed entry porch
e) Removal of original stack bond slump stone entry wall f) Removal of the original flush wood entrance door Relocation of the primary entrance
g) Installation of an incompatible stock entrance door
h) Alteration of the southeast corner window to accommodate new entrance i) Re-cladding of stack bond slump stone chimney with incompatible manufactured stone veneer
j) Installation of incompatible manufactured stone veneer wall base k) Two additions on the primary façade
l) Two additions to the secondary, north façade
m) Removal of at least twenty original windows; these were either infilled or replaced with incompatible vinyl units
n) Replacement of three original aluminum framed sliding glass doors with incompatible vinyl units
o) Installation of at least seven incompatible new vinyl windows in new window openings
p) Removal/replacement of some original siding
WHEREAS, based on the findings of the Historic Resources Evaluation report and following the public hearing on May 2, 2023, for the Appeal of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s decision on Demolition Permit No. 357, the City Council found:

1. Due to the compromised historic integrity of the Baker residence, the structure is not eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register, nor is it eligible for designation as a City of Redlands Historic Landmark or Resource; and

2. Demolition Permit No. 357 would not substantially alter an eligible historic resource, and is therefore exempt from the preparation of a negative Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 500 of 546
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8471 Uphold Appeal of Demolition No. 357 - 130 Sierra Vista.docx declaration or environmental impact report under the California Environmental Quality Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein.

Section 2. Based on the evidence and testimony presented to the City Council during the public hearing, including the findings and analysis of the Historic Resource Evaluation report, as modified, prepared by Historic Resources Group and the peer review report prepared by ECORP, the applicant’s Appeal of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s decision to deny Demolition Permit No. 357 is hereby upheld, reversing the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s denial.

Section 3. The approval of Demolition Permit No. 357 is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15301(l)(1) (Existing Facilities), and there is no substantial evidence of any potentially significant impacts.

Section 4. Demolition Permit No. 357 is hereby approved subject to the conditions of approval contained in Exhibit A attached to this Resolution.

Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

ADOPTED, SIGNED, AND APPROVED this 2nd day of May, 2023. __________________________________
Eddie Tejeda, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 501 of 546
4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8471 Uphold Appeal of Demolition No. 357 - 130 Sierra Vista.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 502 of 546
5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8471 Uphold Appeal of Demolition No. 357 - 130 Sierra Vista.docx

EXHIBIT A

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

PLANNING DIVISION

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 357

1. This approval is to demolish an approximately 2,794 square-foot, single-family residential dwelling over 50 years of age located at 130 Sierra Vista Drive (APN: 0293-141-32-0000)

2. Prior to demolition, a building permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Department.

3. The issuance of any permits shall comply with all provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code, including Section 15.44 which regulates the demolition of structures.

4. All demolition activities shall be limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and prohibited on Sundays and Federal Holidays.

5. The applicant for this permit, and its successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Redlands, and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, and proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this permit by the City, or brought against the City due to acts or omissions in any way connected to the applicant’s project that is the subject of this permit. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees, costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in such actions or proceedings, including damages for the injury to property or persons, including death of a person, and any award of attorneys’ fees.

In the event any such action is commenced to attack, set aside, void, or annul all, or any, provisions of this permit, or is commenced for any other reason against the City for acts or omissions relating to the applicant’s project, within fourteen (14) City business days of the same, the applicant shall file with the City a performance bond or irrevocable letter of credit (together, the “Security”) in a form and in an amount satisfactory to the City, to ensure applicant’s performance of its defense and indemnity obligations under this condition. The failure of the applicant to provide the Security shall be deemed an express acknowledgment and agreement by the applicant that the City shall have the authority and right, without objection by the applicant, to revoke all entitlements granted for the project pursuant to this permit. The City shall have no liability to the applicant for the exercise of City’s right to revoke this permit.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 503 of 546
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8472 Deny Appeal commission's decision to deny Permit No. 357.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8472

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE HISTORIC AND SCENIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY DEMOLITION
PERMIT NO. 357.

WHEREAS, Brian McKernan, property owner, has submitted an application for Demolition Permit No. 357 to demolish a 2,794 square-foot single-family residential dwelling located at 130 Sierra Vista within the Estate Residential (R-A) zone (APN: 0176-173-09-0000); and
WHEREAS, notice of the February 2, 2023, Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission public hearing for the Project was mailed to the owners of record of all properties within 300 feet of the subject property by the Secretary to the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission held a public hearing and considered the staff report, oral report, the testimony and the written evidence submitted by and on behalf of the applicant and by members of the public; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission Continued the Project to an unspecified date; and
WHEREAS, notice of the April 6, 2023, Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission public hearing was mailed to the owners of record of all properties within 300 feet of the subject property by the Secretary to the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission held a public hearing and considered the staff report, oral report, the testimony and the written evidence submitted by and on behalf of the applicant and by members of the public; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing on April 6, 2023, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission found that despite alterations that had been made to the original home, the structure still retains sufficient integrity, such that it remains an historic resource and that the demolition would significantly alter a historic resource; and WHEREAS, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission found:
a) Despite the changes made to the original structure, the Baker residence retains sufficient integrity to meet the criteria for listing in the California Register as it has the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information; and b) Demolition of the Baker residence would significantly alter a historic resource and therefore is not exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and WHEREAS, based on these findings, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission denied Demolition Permit No. 357; and
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 504 of 546
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8472 Deny Appeal commission's decision to deny Permit No. 357.docx WHEREAS, Brian and Celina McKernan (“Appellant”), has filed a timely application on April 10, 2023, to appeal the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s denial of the Demolition Permit No. 357; and
WHEREAS, on May 2, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Appeal of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s decision to deny denial of Demolition Permit No. 357, and considered verbal and written testimony of City Staff, the applicant and public comments from members of the public.

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on May 2, 2023, for the Appeal of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission’s decision to deny Demolition Permit No. 357, the City Council concurred with the Commission’s findings and analysis that found:
a) Despite the changes made to the original structure, the Baker residence retains sufficient integrity to meet the criteria for listing in the California Register as it has the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information; and b) Demolition of the Baker residence would significantly alter a historic resource and therefore is not exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein.

Section 2. Approval of Demolition Permit No. 357 will significantly alter a historic resource and will cause significant impacts to the environment, as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b), and therefore, is not exempt from environmental review in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 3. Based on the evidence and testimony presented to the City Council during the public hearing, including the findings and analysis of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal and upholds the decision of the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission to deny Demolition Permit No. 357.

ADOPTED, SIGNED, AND APPROVED this 2nd day of May, 2023. __________________________________
Eddie Tejeda, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 505 of 546
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8472 Deny Appeal commission's decision to deny Permit No. 357.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 506 of 546
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting L. 1.

DATE: 05/02/2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Enterprise License Agreement with Esri for a period of 3 years at an amount not-to-exceed $273,409 for mapping software and services (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that the staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to approve the Enterprise License Agreement with Esri for a period of 3 years at an amount not-to-exceed $273,409 for mapping software and services.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Enterprise License Agreement with Esri for a period of 3 years at an amount not-to-exceed $273,409 for mapping software and services.

DISCUSSION:

In May 2011, the City entered into an Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) with Esri to use Esri's software and services. At the time, that was the first ELA that Esri entered into with a city the size of Redlands. The agreement presented herein would represent the City's fifth consecutive ELA with Esri to date. This type of licensing agreement has allowed Redlands to expand the use of Esri's mapping software throughout the City. Esri ArcGIS Desktop software continues to be an integral part of the business process for many departments in the City. The City has also taken advantage of Esri's ArcGIS Online platform to deliver the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) system in a more mobile setting, to field workers and also to members of the public. The City has been using Esri products to develop important applications supporting the work of many departments. Esri ArcGIS Server software allows the City to easily display Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 507 of 546
many departments. Esri ArcGIS Server software allows the City to easily display information to the public in a map format. The City's GIS currently maintains more than 300 layers and has dozens of interactive map applications and dashboards that were developed with and require Esri licensing. These include polling locations, Zoning, General Plan, City Capital Improvement Projects, Road Closures, and water shutdowns, which are readily available to the public. (GIS Open Data Hub). Some examples are highlighted below:

Development Services:

City of Redlands Zoning app: Zone App
OneStop Map: used to locate projects and provide a visual explanation of the surrounding area through important layers such as parcels, address points, different boundaries, fire hazard areas, streets, street lights, traffic signals, and aerial imagery among others. There are 3 versions available for users: ArcMap, ArcGIS Pro, and OneStop Web App.

Its analysis tools have contributed to the development of the Pavement Accelerated Repair Implementation Strategy (PARIS) and the Street Lighting Upgrade Program.

CityWorks: several layers used by CityWorks have been developed and are maintained through Esri products, used for permitting through the One Stop Permit Center for processing work orders for general infrastructure maintenance.

Esri's Business Analyst app is an integral part of the Development Services Department’s efforts to attract new and expanded business to the City of Redlands.

Licensing for ArcGIS Urban will also help City departments visualize existing and proposed private development projects in a real-time 3D web viewer.

Facilities & Community Services:

Parks Map Tour App: Parks Tour App
Street Sweeping App: Street Sweeping App
City Trees App: City Trees App.

Homeless Outreach: developed with Survey123.

Fire Department:

Weed Abatement Program: using Survey123 for data collection and ArcGIS Dashboards to visualize and update the status of the inspections.

Fireworks Reporter: using Survey123 for data collection and ArcGIS Dashboards to visualize and update the status of the reports.

Fire department hub: Fire Department Hub
Esri software was used during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform residents of open businesses and analyze at-risk populations.

Police Department:

Spillman: all the layers used by the Police Department’s Spillman Computer-Aided Dispatch program are being maintained and are hosted using Esri Products.

Redlands PD K9 Weekly Evaluation: developed with Survey123.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 508 of 546
Redlands PD K9 Weekly Evaluation: developed with Survey123.

Racial and Identity Profiling Act Legislation (RIPA) Stop Survey: An initial version of RIPA was developed using Survey123.

Crime analysis to aid in the deployment of law enforcement resources.

It is used to visually present traffic collision data throughout the City, which was a key input into the development of the City's successful grant applications for the Safe Routes to Schools program.

Municipal Utilities and Engineering:

City Streetlights App: Streetlights App
All the city's water distribution system is currently updated through Esri products both in the field and to add new features through our desktop version. Some layers include wells, valves, treatment plants, water main, hydrants, meters, and laterals, among others.

Sewer Cleaning App: Sewer Cleaning App
All the sewer system infrastructure is maintained through Esri products.

Open Government:

Its ArcGIS Hub service is used to display and organize the City’s Open Data web mapping applications and GIS data downloads.

The current License Agreement incorporates new applications and subscriptions which are listed below:

ArcGIS Developer Subscriptions: this will allow the GIS team to extend and customize our current GIS applications with scripts and extensions.

Site Scan: This is a cloud-based drone mapping software to support data collection of current or future drone users within the city. This application will allow easy web visualization and further analysis of collected data. 10-Day Training Pass: this will allow the GIS team and users to keep their knowledge and skills updated. This is especially important as Esri launches new updates of their application every year or less in some cases. 100 ArcGIS Online Worker Annual Subscription: this will reduce ArcGIS online viewers and allow field workers who only need to visualize data to update.

ArcGIS Mission: we are planning to start using ArcGIS Mission in year 2.

This is an application focused on Police and Fire departments which will allow them to provide tactical situational awareness to their teams about real-time events and activities. This tool will allow teams to share their location, track movements, gain insights, and will increase transparency throughout incidents.

The GIS team plans to leverage new projects to benefit the city and some examples are:

City Hub update: GIS is currently planning new and relevant content, allowing internal and external stakeholders access to both data and applications. The development of the new hub will have internal and external pages, allowing content to specific users, and will be developed in three stages and providing content by the department.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 509 of 546
Fire Department Risk Assessment: with the support of Esri, GIS and the Fire Department will start working on a fire risk assessment that will allow prioritized fire prevention activities. This project will be part of a pilot project with Esri and their new Risk Assessment solution team.

ArcGIS Missions: the Police, Fire Department, and GIS will be participating in a pilot project with Esri to test ArcGIS Mission through a test scenario.

This pilot study will allow each of the departments involved to identify needs and plan ahead to be ready for the actual deployment.

Parcel Viewer: GIS is currently working on updating the parcel layer that is being used in different applications targeting different users. A planned project is to develop a Parcel Viewer for internal users and it will be hosted in the internal city hub.

Police and Fire dashboards: GIS is planning to launch different dashboards to support both departments' activities, including crime and call for service analytics, a new EOC dashboard, and updated applications.

Migrating water, stormwater, and sewer systems: one of the big projects planned by the GIS team is to transfer the current water, stormwater, and sewer data layers within ArcGIS from a geometric network to a utility network. The migration will bring great benefits for both users and the GIS team, who are constantly updating them. This is a long-term project that will be done over several months with Esri Professional Services guidance.

The cost of the Enterprise License Agreement is $273,409 over the next three years. This represents an increase of roughly $70,000, reflecting the updated pricing as well as the addition of several new products. This is a sole source procurement.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not approve the Enterprise License Agreement. This is not recommended, however, due to the extent of workflows dependent on currently existing Esri applications.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Objective A-1: Enhance fiscal and operational practices to support fiscal stability, transparency, and data-driven decisions.

Supports Objective B-1: Business Attraction: Increase efforts to identify/target/attract new retail, service, healthcare and technology businesses as identified in the Economic Development Action Plan (Section 1.1; 1.2; 1.3)
Supports Objective B- 2: Tourism: Increase tourism by marketing Redlands as a destination and expand/enhance the Downtown area and related events as identified in the Economic Development Action Plan (Sections

4.1, 4.2, 4.3).

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 510 of 546
Supports Objective C-6: Citywide Drainage Master Plan Implementation Supports Objective C-9: Water and Wastewater Pipeline Replacement Program
Supports Objective C-11: PARIS Program
Supports Objective D-5: Open Space Weed Abatement
SUBMITTED BY:

Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:

Claudia Caceres, GIS Supervisor
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 2023
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Amount: 273,409
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Account No.: 604900
Discussion:

Funding for this enterprise license agreement is included in the Management Services Department's adopted budget for Fiscal Years 2023 & 2024. Amounts for FY 2025 will be included in the Department's subsequent fiscal year budget requests.

FY 2023: $83,636
FY 2024: $94,636
FY 2025: $95,136
Attachments
Esri Enterprise License Agreement 2023
Esri Quotation # Q-494181
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 511 of 546
Esri Use Only:

Cust. Name
Cust. #
PO #
Esri Agreement #

SMALL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT

COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY GOVERNMENT
(E214-3)
This Agreement is by and between the organization identified in the Quotation ("Customer") and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. ("Esri").

This Agreement sets forth the terms for Customer's use of Products and incorporates by reference (i) the Quotation and (ii) the Master Agreement. Should there be any conflict between the terms and conditions of the documents that comprise this Agreement, the order of precedence for the documents shall be as follows: (i) the Quotation, (ii) this Agreement, and (iii) the Master Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which Customer is located without reference to conflict of laws principles, and the United States of America federal law shall govern in matters of intellectual property. The modifications and additional rights granted in this Agreement apply only to the Products listed in Table A.

Table A
List of Products
Uncapped Quantities
Desktop Software and Extensions (Single Use)
ArcGIS Desktop Advanced
ArcGIS Desktop Standard
ArcGIS Desktop Basic
ArcGIS Desktop Extensions: ArcGIS 3D Analyst,
ArcGIS Spatial Analyst, ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst,
ArcGIS Publisher, ArcGIS Network Analyst, ArcGIS
Schematics, ArcGIS Workflow Manager, ArcGIS Data
Reviewer
Enterprise Software and Extensions
ArcGIS Enterprise (Advanced and Standard)
ArcGIS Monitor
ArcGIS Enterprise Extensions: ArcGIS 3D Analyst,
ArcGIS Spatial Analyst, ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst,
ArcGIS Network Analyst, ArcGIS Schematics, ArcGIS
Workflow Manager, ArcGIS Data Reviewer
Enterprise Additional Capability Servers
ArcGIS Image Server
Developer Tools
ArcGIS Runtime Standard
ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension
Limited Quantities
One (1) Professional subscription to ArcGIS Developer
Two (2) ArcGIS CityEngine Single Use Licenses
250 ArcGIS Online Viewers
250 ArcGIS Online Creators
37,500 ArcGIS Online Service Credits
250 ArcGIS Enterprise Creators
5 ArcGIS Insights in ArcGIS Enterprise
5 ArcGIS Insights in ArcGIS Online
50 ArcGIS Location Sharing for ArcGIS Enterprise
50 ArcGIS Location Sharing for ArcGIS Online
4 ArcGIS Parcel Fabric User Type Extensions (Enterprise) 4 ArcGIS Utility Network User Type Extensions (Enterprise) 4 ArcGIS Trace Network User Type Extensions (Enterprise)

OTHER BENEFITS
Number of Esri User Conference registrations provided annually 4 Number of Tier 1 Help Desk individuals authorized to call Esri 4 Maximum number of sets of backup media, if requested* 2 Five percent (5%) discount on all individual commercially available instructor-led training classes at Esri facilities purchased outside this Agreement
*Additional sets of backup media may be purchased for a fee Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 512 of 546

Customer may accept this Agreement by signing and returning the whole Agreement with (i) the Quotation attached, (ii) a purchase order, or (iii) another document that matches the Quotation and references this Agreement ("Ordering Document"). ADDITIONAL OR CONFLICTING TERMS IN CUSTOMER'S PURCHASE

ORDER OR OTHER DOCUMENT WILL NOT APPLY, AND THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT WILL GOVERN. This Agreement is effective as of the date of Esri's receipt of an Ordering Document, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties ("Effective Date").

Term of Agreement: Three (3) years
This Agreement supersedes any previous agreements, proposals, presentations, understandings, and arrangements between the parties relating to the licensing of the Products. Except as provided in Article 4— Product Updates, no modifications can be made to this Agreement.

Accepted and Agreed:
(Customer)
By:

Authorized Signature
Printed Name:

Title:

Date:

CUSTOMER CONTACT INFORMATION
Contact: Telephone:

Address: Fax:

City, State, Postal Code: E-mail:

Country:

Quotation Number (if applicable):

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 513 of 546

1.0—ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS
In addition to the definitions provided in the Master
Agreement, the following definitions apply to this
Agreement:
"Case" means a failure of the Software or Online
Services to operate according to the Documentation
where such failure substantially impacts operational
or functional performance.
"Deploy", "Deployed" and "Deployment" mean to
redistribute and install the Products and related
Authorization Codes within Customer's
organization(s).
"Fee" means the fee set forth in the Quotation.
"Maintenance" means Tier 2 Support, Product
updates, and Product patches provided to Customer
during the Term of Agreement.
"Master Agreement" means the applicable master
agreement for Esri Products incorporated by this
reference that is (i) found at https://www.esri.com/enus/legal/terms/full-master-agreement and available in the installation process requiring acceptance by
electronic acknowledgment or (ii) a signed Esri
master agreement or license agreement that
supersedes such electronically acknowledged
master agreement.
"Product(s)" means the products identified in
Table A—List of Products and any updates to the list
Esri provides in writing.
"Quotation" means the offer letter and quotation
provided separately to Customer.
"Technical Support" means the technical
assistance for attempting resolution of a reported
Case through error correction, patches, hot fixes,
workarounds, replacement deliveries, or any other
type of Product corrections or modifications.
"Tier 1 Help Desk" means Customer's point of
contact(s) to provide all Tier 1 Support within
Customer's organization(s).
"Tier 1 Support" means the Technical Support
provided by the Tier 1 Help Desk.
"Tier 2 Support" means the Esri Technical Support
provided to the Tier 1 Help Desk when a Case
cannot be resolved through Tier 1 Support.

2.0—ADDITIONAL GRANT OF LICENSE

2.1 Grant of License. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, Esri grants to
Customer a personal, nonexclusive,
nontransferable license solely to use, copy, and
Deploy quantities of the Products listed in
Table A—List of Products for the Term of
Agreement (i) for the applicable Fee and (ii) in
accordance with the Master Agreement.

2.2 Consultant Access. Esri grants Customer the
right to permit Customer's consultants or
contractors to use the Products exclusively for
Customer's benefit. Customer will be solely
responsible for compliance by consultants and
contractors with this Agreement and will ensure
that the consultant or contractor discontinues
use of Products upon completion of work for
Customer. Access to or use of Products by
consultants or contractors not exclusively for
Customer's benefit is prohibited. Customer may
not permit its consultants or contractors to install
Software or Data on consultant, contractor, or
third-party computers or remove Software or
Data from Customer locations, except for the
purpose of hosting the Software or Data on
Contractor servers for the benefit of Customer.

3.0—TERM, TERMINATION, AND EXPIRATION

3.1 Term. This Agreement and all licenses
hereunder will commence on the Effective Date
and continue for the duration identified in the
Term of Agreement, unless this Agreement is
terminated earlier as provided herein. Customer
is only authorized to use Products during the
Term of Agreement. For an Agreement with a
limited term, Esri does not grant Customer an
indefinite or a perpetual license to Products.

3.2 No Use upon Agreement Expiration or
Termination. All Product licenses, all
Maintenance, and Esri User Conference
registrations terminate upon expiration or
termination of this Agreement.

3.3 Termination for a Material Breach. Either party
may terminate this Agreement for a material
breach by the other party. The breaching party
will have thirty (30) days from the date of written
notice to cure any material breach.

3.4 Termination for Lack of Funds. For an
Agreement with government or governmentRedlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 514 of 546

owned entities, either party may terminate this
Agreement before any subsequent year if
Customer is unable to secure funding through
the legislative or governing body's approval
process.

3.5 Follow-on Term. If the parties enter into
another agreement substantially similar to this
Agreement for an additional term, the effective
date of the follow-on agreement will be the day
after the expiration date of this Agreement.

4.0—PRODUCT UPDATES

4.1 Future Updates. Esri reserves the right to
update the list of Products in Table A—List of
Products by providing written notice to
Customer. Customer may continue to use all
Products that have been Deployed, but support
and upgrades for deleted items may not be
available. As new Products are incorporated into
the standard program, they will be offered to
Customer via written notice for incorporation into
the Products schedule at no additional charge.

Customer's use of new or updated Products
requires Customer to adhere to applicable
additional or revised terms and conditions in the
Master Agreement.

4.2 Product Life Cycle. During the Term of
Agreement, some Products may be retired or
may no longer be available to Deploy in the
identified quantities. Maintenance will be subject
to the individual Product Life Cycle Support
Status and Product Life Cycle Support Policy,
which can be found at
https://support.esri.com/en/otherresources/product-life-cycle. Updates for Products in the mature and retired phases may
not be available. Customer may continue to use
Products already Deployed, but Customer will
not be able to Deploy retired Products.

5.0—MAINTENANCE
The Fee includes standard maintenance benefits
during the Term of Agreement as specified in the
most current applicable Esri Maintenance and
Support Program document (found at
https://www.esri.com/enus/legal/terms/maintenance). At Esri's sole discretion, Esri may make patches, hot fixes, or
updates available for download. No Software other
than the defined Products will receive Maintenance.

Customer may acquire maintenance for other
Software outside this Agreement.
a. Tier 1 Support

1. Customer will provide Tier 1 Support
through the Tier 1 Help Desk to all
Customer's authorized users.

2. The Tier 1 Help Desk will be fully trained in
the Products.

3. At a minimum, Tier 1 Support will include
those activities that assist the user in
resolving how-to and operational questions
as well as questions on installation and
troubleshooting procedures.

4. The Tier 1 Help Desk will be the initial point
of contact for all questions and reporting of a
Case. The Tier 1 Help Desk will obtain a full
description of each reported Case and the
system configuration from the user. This
may include obtaining any customizations,
code samples, or data involved in the Case.

5. If the Tier 1 Help Desk cannot resolve the
Case, an authorized Tier 1 Help Desk
individual may contact Tier 2 Support. The
Tier 1 Help Desk will provide support in such
a way as to minimize repeat calls and make
solutions to problems available to
Customer’s organization.

6. Tier 1 Help Desk individuals are the only
individuals authorized to contact Tier 2
Support. Customer may change the Tier 1
Help Desk individuals by written notice to
Esri.
b. Tier 2 Support

1. Tier 2 Support will log the calls received
from Tier 1 Help Desk.

2. Tier 2 Support will review all information
collected by and received from the Tier 1
Help Desk including preliminary documented
troubleshooting provided by the Tier 1 Help
Desk when Tier 2 Support is required.

3. Tier 2 Support may request that Tier 1 Help
Desk individuals provide verification of
information, additional information, or
answers to additional questions to
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 515 of 546

supplement any preliminary information
gathering or troubleshooting performed by
Tier 1 Help Desk.

4. Tier 2 Support will attempt to resolve the
Case submitted by Tier 1 Help Desk.

5. When the Case is resolved, Tier 2 Support
will communicate the information to Tier 1
Help Desk, and Tier 1 Help Desk will
disseminate the resolution to the user(s).

6.0—ENDORSEMENT AND PUBLICITY
This Agreement will not be construed or interpreted
as an exclusive dealings agreement or Customer's
endorsement of Products. Either party may publicize
the existence of this Agreement.

7.0—ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

7.1 OEM Licenses. Under Esri's OEM or Solution
OEM programs, OEM partners are authorized to
embed or bundle portions of Esri products and
services with their application or service. OEM
partners' business model, licensing terms and
conditions, and pricing are independent of this
Agreement. Customer will not seek any discount
from the OEM partner or Esri based on the
availability of Products under this Agreement.

Customer will not decouple Esri products or
services from the OEM partners' application or
service.

7.2 Annual Report of Deployments. At each
anniversary date and ninety (90) calendar days
prior to the expiration of this Agreement,
Customer will provide Esri with a written report
detailing all Deployments. Upon request,
Customer will provide records sufficient to verify
the accuracy of the annual report.

8.0—ORDERING, ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEDURES, DELIVERY, AND

DEPLOYMENT

8.1 Orders, Delivery, and Deployment
a. Upon the Effective Date, Esri will invoice
Customer and provide Authorization Codes to
activate the nondestructive copy protection
program that enables Customer to download,
operate, or allow access to the Products. If this
is a multi-year Agreement, Esri may invoice the
Fee up to thirty (30) calendar days before the
annual anniversary date for each year.
b. Undisputed invoices will be due and payable
within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of
invoice. Esri reserves the right to suspend
Customer's access to and use of Products if
Customer fails to pay any undisputed amount
owed on or before its due date. Esri may charge
Customer interest at a monthly rate equal to the
lesser of one percent (1.0%) per month or the
maximum rate permitted by applicable law on
any overdue fees plus all expenses of collection
for any overdue balance that remains unpaid
ten (10) days after Esri has notified Customer of
the past-due balance.
c. Esri's federal ID number is 95-2775-732.
d. If requested, Esri will ship backup media to the
ship-to address identified on the Ordering
Document, FOB Destination, with shipping
charges prepaid. Customer acknowledges that
should sales or use taxes become due as a
result of any shipments of tangible media, Esri
has a right to invoice and Customer will pay any
such sales or use tax associated with the receipt
of tangible media.

8.2 Order Requirements. Esri does not require
Customer to issue a purchase order. Customer
may submit a purchase order in accordance with
its own process requirements, provided that if
Customer issues a purchase order, Customer
will submit its initial purchase order on the
Effective Date. If this is a multi-year Agreement,
Customer will submit subsequent purchase
orders to Esri at least thirty (30) calendar days
before the annual anniversary date for each
year.
a. All orders pertaining to this Agreement will be
processed through Customer's centralized point
of contact.
b. The following information will be included in
each Ordering Document:
(1) Customer name; Esri customer number, if
known; and bill-to and ship-to addresses
(2) Order number
(3) Applicable annual payment due
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 516 of 546

9.0—MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, OR

DIVESTITURES
If Customer is a commercial entity, Customer will
notify Esri in writing in the event of (i) a
consolidation, merger, or reorganization of Customer
with or into another corporation or entity;
(ii) Customer's acquisition of another entity; or (iii) a transfer or sale of all or part of Customer's
organization (subsections i, ii, and iii, collectively
referred to as "Ownership Change"). There will be
no decrease in Fee as a result of any Ownership
Change.

9.1 If an Ownership Change increases the
cumulative program count beyond the maximum
level for this Agreement, Esri reserves the right
to increase the Fee or terminate this Agreement
and the parties will negotiate a new agreement.

9.2 If an Ownership Change results in transfer or
sale of a portion of Customer's organization, that
portion of Customer's organization will transfer
the Products to Customer or uninstall, remove,
and destroy all copies of the Products.

9.3 This Agreement may not be assigned to a
successor entity as a result of an Ownership
Change unless approved by Esri in writing in
advance. If the assignment to the new entity is
not approved, Customer will require any
successor entity to uninstall, remove, and
destroy the Products. This Agreement will
terminate upon such Ownership Change.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 517 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
168179 1 Year 1 $56,700.00 0% $56,700.00 $56,700.00
Populations of 50,001 to 100,000 Small Government Enterprise Agreement Annual Subscription 168179 1 Year 2 $56,700.00 0% $56,700.00 $56,700.00
Populations of 50,001 to 100,000 Small Government Enterprise Agreement Annual Subscription 168179 1 Year 3 $56,700.00 0% $56,700.00 $56,700.00
Populations of 50,001 to 100,000 Small Government Enterprise Agreement Annual Subscription 173625 1 $4,500.00 0% $4,500.00 $4,500.00
Site Scan for ArcGIS Operator Annual Subscription USA Hosted. This user type license is the foundation of Site Scan for ArcGIS. It provides drone operators the ability to create and fly drone missions using Site Scan Flight Planning, and to upload drone flight data into Site Scan Manager for processing into 2D and 3D outputs. In addition to the ability to fly a drone and upload images for processing, Site Scan Operators have the same privileges as a Site Scan Access License, including ability to download, edit, analyze, and share project data using the Site Scan Manager web interface. What’s Included: Access to Site Scan for ArcGIS Flight Planning iOS App, Access to Site Scan for ArcGIS Manager Web App, Unlimited data processing and storage in private cloud, Unlimited View Only Licenses, Technical support (Email/phone support [7AM to 7PM PT: Monday thru Friday], E Learning online knowledge base.
173632 1 $500.00 3.2% $484.00 $484.00
Site Scan Single Access USA Hosted Annual Subscription - Year 1 180147 1 $3,500.00 50% $1,750.00 $1,750.00
Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 518 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
Drone2Map Advanced for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription - Year 1 174382 10 $895.00 5% $850.25 $8,502.50
10-Day Esri Training Pass: Year 1
157511 250 $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00
Small Enterprise Agreement Public Safety ArcGIS Online Creator in Continually Staffed Environment - Year 1 157519 250 $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00
Small Enterprise Agreement Public Safety Enterprise Creator in Continually Staffed Environment - Year 1 159166 1 $10,000.00 50% $5,000.00 $5,000.00
ArcGIS Hub Premium: ArcGIS Online Community Annual Subscription - Year 1 178731 2 $3,300.00 50% $1,650.00 $3,300.00
ArcGIS Urban Online Annual Subscription - Year 1
169044 1 $4,400.00 50% $2,200.00 $2,200.00
ArcGIS Suite Online Annual Subscription - Year 1
178625 4 $100.00 20% $80.00 $320.00
Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 519 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App Standard Online Annual Subscription - Year 1 178624 1 $1,100.00 20% $880.00 $880.00
ArcGIS Business Analyst Standard Online Bundle Annual Subscription - Year 1 173625 1 $4,500.00 0% $4,500.00 $4,500.00
Site Scan for ArcGIS Operator Annual Subscription USA Hosted. This user type license is the foundation of Site Scan for ArcGIS. It provides drone operators the ability to create and fly drone missions using Site Scan Flight Planning, and to upload drone flight data into Site Scan Manager for processing into 2D and 3D outputs. In addition to the ability to fly a drone and upload images for processing, Site Scan Operators have the same privileges as a Site Scan Access License, including ability to download, edit, analyze, and share project data using the Site Scan Manager web interface. What’s Included: Access to Site Scan for ArcGIS Flight Planning iOS App, Access to Site Scan for ArcGIS Manager Web App, Unlimited data processing and storage in private cloud, Unlimited View Only Licenses, Technical support (Email/phone support [7AM to 7PM PT: Monday thru Friday], E Learning online knowledge base.
173632 1 $500.00 3.2% $484.00 $484.00
Site Scan Single Access USA Hosted Annual Subscription - Year 2 180147 1 $3,500.00 50% $1,750.00 $1,750.00
Drone2Map Advanced for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription - Year 2 174382 10 $895.00 5% $850.25 $8,502.50
10-Day Esri Training Pass: Year 2
Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 520 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
157511 250 $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00
Small Enterprise Agreement Public Safety ArcGIS Online Creator in Continually Staffed Environment - Year 2 157519 250 $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00
Small Enterprise Agreement Public Safety Enterprise Creator in Continually Staffed Environment - Year 2 159166 1 $10,000.00 50% $5,000.00 $5,000.00
ArcGIS Hub Premium: ArcGIS Online Community Annual Subscription - Year 2 178731 2 $3,300.00 50% $1,650.00 $3,300.00
ArcGIS Urban Online Annual Subscription - Year 2
169044 1 $4,400.00 50% $2,200.00 $2,200.00
ArcGIS Urban Suite Online Annual Subscription - Year 2
178625 4 $100.00 20% $80.00 $320.00
ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App Standard Online Annual Subscription - Year 2 178624 1 $1,100.00 20% $880.00 $880.00
ArcGIS Business Analyst Standard Online Bundle Annual Subscription - Year 2 Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 521 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
173258 4 $550.00 50% $275.00 $1,100.00
ArcGIS Mission Manager for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription - Year 2 172487 1 $13,200.00 50% $6,600.00 $6,600.00
ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription - Year 2 172567 1 $6,600.00 50% $3,300.00 $3,300.00
ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription - Year 2 173625 1 $5,000.00 0% $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Site Scan for ArcGIS Operator Annual Subscription USA Hosted. This user type license is the foundation of Site Scan for ArcGIS. It provides drone operators the ability to create and fly drone missions using Site Scan Flight Planning, and to upload drone flight data into Site Scan Manager for processing into 2D and 3D outputs. In addition to the ability to fly a drone and upload images for processing, Site Scan Operators have the same privileges as a Site Scan Access License, including ability to download, edit, analyze, and share project data using the Site Scan Manager web interface. What’s Included: Access to Site Scan for ArcGIS Flight Planning iOS App, Access to Site Scan for ArcGIS Manager Web App, Unlimited data processing and storage in private cloud, Unlimited View Only Licenses, Technical support (Email/phone support [7AM to 7PM PT: Monday thru Friday], E Learning online knowledge base.
173632 1 $500.00 3.2% $484.00 $484.00
Site Scan Single Access USA Hosted Annual Subscription - Year 3 180147 1 $3,500.00 50% $1,750.00 $1,750.00
Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 522 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
Drone2Map Advanced for ArcGIS Online Annual Subscription - Year 3 174382 10 $895.00 5% $850.25 $8,502.50
10-Day Esri Training Pass: Year 3
157511 250 $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00
Small Enterprise Agreement Public Safety ArcGIS Online Creator in Continually Staffed Environment - Year 3 157519 250 $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00
Small Enterprise Agreement Public Safety Enterprise Creator in Continually Staffed Environment - Year 3 159166 1 $10,000.00 50% $5,000.00 $5,000.00
ArcGIS Hub Premium: ArcGIS Online Community Annual Subscription - Year 3 169044 1 $4,400.00 50% $2,200.00 $2,200.00
ArcGIS Urban Suite Online Annual Subscription - Year 3
178731 2 $3,300.00 50% $1,650.00 $3,300.00
ArcGIS Urban Online Annual Subscription - Year 3
178625 4 $100.00 20% $80.00 $320.00
Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 523 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] Material Qty Term List Price Discount Unit Price Total
ArcGIS Business Analyst Web App Standard Online Annual Subscription - Year 3 178624 1 $1,100.00 20% $880.00 $880.00
ArcGIS Business Analyst Standard Online Bundle Annual Subscription - Year 3 173258 4 $550.00 50% $275.00 $1,100.00
ArcGIS Mission Manager for ArcGIS Enterprise Annual Subscription - Year 3 172487 1 $13,200.00 50% $6,600.00 $6,600.00
ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Annual Subscription - Year 3 172567 1 $6,600.00 50% $3,300.00 $3,300.00
ArcGIS Mission Server Up to Four Cores Staging Server Annual Subscription - Year 3 Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 524 of 546
Quotation # Q-494181
Date: April 4, 2023
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
380 New York St
Redlands, CA 92373-8100
Phone: (909) 793-2853
DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: 0AMS3
Customer # 381702 Contract #
City of Redlands
Management Services
35 Cajon St Ste 222
Redlands, CA 92373
To expedite your order, please attach a copy of ATTENTION: Danielle Garcia this quotation to your purchase order. PHONE: (909) 798-7507 Quote is valid from: 4/4/2023 To: 7/3/2023 EMAIL: [email protected] List Price Total: $334,450.00
Discount: $61,040.50
Subtotal: $273,409.50
Sales Tax: $0.00
Estimated Shipping and Handling (Surface Delivery): $0.00 Contract Price Adjust: $0.00
Total: $273,409.50
Year 1 = $83,636.50
Year 2 = $94,636.50
Year 3 = $95,136.50
3-Year Total = $273,409.50
Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program.

For questions contact:

Jacqueline Scott
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
(909) 793-2853 x1650
The items on this quotation are subject to and governed by the terms of this quotation, the most current product specific scope of use document found at https://assets.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/media/legal/product-specific-terms-of-use/e300.pdf, and your applicable signed agreement with Esri. If no such agreement covers any item quoted, then Esri’s standard terms and conditions found at https://go.esri.com/MAPS apply to your purchase of that item. If any item is quoted with a multi-year payment schedule, then unless otherwise stated in this quotation, Customer is required to make all payments without right of cancellation. Third-party data sets included in a quotation as separately licensed items will only be provided and invoiced if Esri is able to provide such data and will be subject to the applicable third-party's terms and conditions. If Esri is unable to provide any such data set, Customer will not be responsible for any further payments for the data set. US Federal government entities and US government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri’s GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Supplemental terms and conditions found at https://www.esri.com/en-us/legal/terms/state-supplemental apply to some US state and local government purchases. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri’s offerings. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. Unless prohibited by law, the quotation information is confidential and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of system selection and purchase/license. The information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without consent from Esri. Delivery is FOB Origin for customers located in the USA.

SCOTTJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 525 of 546
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting L. 2.

DATE: 05/02/2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration and adoption of Resolution No. 8439 amending the Display Policy for the United States, State, Local and Other Flags to Authorize the Flying of the Rainbow Pride Flag at City Hall in the Month of June (City Attorney Abich Garcia)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 8439.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 8439 to approve an amendment to the City’s Display Policy for the United States, State, Local and Other Flags (“Flag Display Policy”) to authorize the flying of the Rainbow Pride Flag at City Hall during the month of June.

DISCUSSION:

This item was initially introduced at the March 21, 2023, City Council meeting.

To permit the full Council to consider this item, the matter was continued to the May 2, 2023, meeting.

Generally, the First Amendment does not require government to allow all speech on city property. The U.S. Supreme Court has adopted what is known as “forum analysis” to determine whether government can control speech on government-owned property:

A “traditional public forum is a place that has traditionally been used by the public for the free exchange of ideas such as a public park. Government

1. Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 526 of 546 regulation of a traditional public forum is severely restricted and must serve a “compelling government interest” and the regulation must be “narrowly drawn” to achieve that interest.

A “designated” or “limited public forum” is property which the government has intentionally opened for expressive activity under certain conditions and restrictions which only need be reasonable (“reasonable time, place or manner restrictions”) but must be viewpoint neutral. The City Council Chambers is an example of a “designated” or “limited public forum” where there can be time limits on speakers, decorum rules, but the public cannot be prohibited from criticizing the City Council.

2. A “nonpublic forum” is all remaining government property that is not dedicated to general public speech or free exchange of ideas. The government may prohibit all forms of free expression on government property that is a nonpublic forum so long as such prohibition is not based on a speaker’s viewpoint.

3. Once the government allows public speech on government property that is a nonpublic forum, it “opens up the forum” and creates a limited public forum where expressive activity subject to viewpoint neutral regulations must be allowed or (depending on the facts) may even create a “traditional public forum” where all forms of speech must be allowed with very limited regulations.

However, when the government is speaking on its own behalf (“government speech”), the First Amendment restrictions related to the various government-established forums discussed above do not apply. In a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case, Surtleff v. City of Boston (May 22, 2022), the Court held that the City of Boston violated the free speech rights of an activist when it refused his request to fly a Christian flag on a flag pole outside city hall because the City had allowed its flag poles to be used by various speakers without regulation, restriction or involvement by the City Council. The Court acknowledged that when the government has a clear policy and guidelines, the government may advance its own speech without requiring viewpoint neutrality when the government itself is the speaker, so long as the government speech does not show religious preference or encourage a certain vote in an election.

Under the “government speech doctrine”, if the City has a written policy with clear guidelines, it may select which flag(s) it wishes to fly as an expression of its own speech on city-owned flag poles, so long as the City does not endorse religion or encourage a certain vote in an election. Many cities are adopting policies to permit “Commemorative Flags” -- flags that identify with a specific date, historical event, cause, nation or group of people whereby the City honors or commemorates that date, event, cause, nation or people by flying the flag as an expression of the City’s official sentiments. Currently, the City’s Flag Display Policy only permits the flying of the flags of the U.S., State of California, City of Redlands and the POW/MIA flag.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 527 of 546
Redlands and the POW/MIA flag.

For the Council’s consideration is Resolution No. 8439 which amends the Flag Display Policy to expressly allow the flying of the Rainbow Pride Flag at City Hall for the month of June.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may consider an amendment to the Flag Display Policy to allow the flying of the Rainbow Pride Flag and other commemorative flags subject to an established procedure.

The City Council may consider making no amendment to the Flag Display Policy which would continue to restrict the use of city-owned flag poles to displaying only the U.S., State of California and City of Redlands flags and the POW/MIA flag.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Priority C: Diversity and Inclusion
SUBMITTED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
PREPARED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 528 of 546
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2022-23
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact.

Attachments
Resolution No. 8439
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 529 of 546
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 8439

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

AMENDING THE DISPLAY POLICY FOR THE UNITED STATES, STATE, CITY

AND OTHER FLAGS
WHEREAS, in honor of the nation, and in recognition of state and local government, the City of Redlands regularly displays flags on and around City facilities; and
WHEREAS, rules and customs pertaining to the display and use of the United States flag have been established by Executive Order of the federal government for use by civilians and civilian groups and organizations; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of the City of Redlands (“this City Council”) that all City departments use and display the United States flag in accordance with such established rules and customs; and
WHEREAS, over two thousand Americans, six hundred fifty from this state, who served in the United States armed forces during the war in Indochina are still listed as prisoners of war or missing in action; and
WHEREAS, this nation is deeply indebted to its servicemen and servicewomen of all wars and conflicts for their courage and sacrifice, and should demonstrate its special commitment to the missing men, women and their families by obtaining the release of those still held prisoner of war and the fullest possible accounting from the responsible governments regarding those Americans listed as missing in action; and WHEREAS, the Prisoner of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) flag is a powerful symbol of the plight of these prisoners of war and missing Americans and reminds the public of the commitment this nation must have in determining the fate of its servicemen and servicewomen; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has determined it is appropriate that the POW/MIA flag should be displayed at certain public buildings throughout the City to increase public awareness of the issue of prisoners of war and those missing in action and to gain public support for the efforts of the United States government to resolve this matter; and WHEREAS, it is further the desire of the City Council to amend the current written policy for the display and use of the United States flag, state and local flags and other flags to expressly authorize the display of the Rainbow Pride Flag in the month of June as an expression of the City’s official sentiments in honor of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer Plus (LGBTQ+) community of the City of Redlands.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redlands hereby repeals Resolution No. 6633, amends, restates and approves the Display Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 530 of 546
2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
Policy for the United States, State, City and other flags attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of May, 2023. ____________
Eddie Tejeda, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 531 of 546
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly approved by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 532 of 546
4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
EXHIBIT “A”

CITY OF REDLANDS DISPLAY POLICY FOR THE

UNITED STATES, STATE, LOCAL AND OTHER FLAGS

POLICY ON DISPLAYING THE UNITED STATES FLAG
Any City department displaying the United States, the State of California and City of Redlands Flags and/or other flags subject to this policy on any City building or grounds shall comply with this policy.

It is proper to display the United States Flag from sunrise to sunset during business hours at each City facility when weather permits. The flag may also be displayed at night if illuminated by a light.

The flag should be raised briskly and lowered slowly and ceremoniously.

When on display, the flag is accorded the place of honor, always positioned to its own right. Place it to the right of the speaker or staging area or sanctuary. Other flags should be to the left.

The United States Flag should be at the center and at the highest point of the group when a number of flags of states, localities or societies are grouped for display.

When one flag is used with the United States Flag and the staffs are crossed, the flag of the United States Flag is placed on its own right with its staff in front of the other flag.

When displaying the flag against a wall, vertically or horizontally, the flag’s union (stars) should be at the top, to the flag’s own right, and to the observer’s left.

POLICY ON DISPLAYING OTHER FLAGS
It is the policy of the City of Redlands that the City’s flag poles are not intended to serve as a forum for free expression by the public or a particular group, but rather for the display of the Flags of the United States, the State of California and the City of Redlands.

The flag poles located at all City facilities may be used to display other flags as may be expressly authorized by this policy as an expression of the City’s official sentiments for a specific date, historical event, cause, nation or group of people reflecting the values and traditions of the United States, the State of California and the City of Redlands, and whereby the City honors or commemorates that date, event, cause, nation or people by flying the flag.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 533 of 546
5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
A. POW/MIA FLAG.

The Redlands City Council acknowledges the POW/MIA flag is a powerful symbol of the plight of prisoners of war and missing Americans and reminds the public of the commitment this nation must have in determining the fate of its servicemen and servicewomen. On August 10, 1990, the 101st Congress passed U.S. Public Law 101- 355, which recognized the POW/MIA flag and designated it “as the symbol of our Nation’s concern and commitment to resolving as fully as possible the fates of Americans still prisoner, missing and unaccounted for in Southeast Asia, thus ending the uncertainty for their families and the Nation.” Thus, it is appropriate that the POW/MIA flag should be displayed at public buildings throughout this City, during daily/normal business hours at each City facility when weather permits, to increase public awareness of the issue of prisoners of war and those missing in action and to gain public support for the efforts of the United States government to resolve this matter.

In flying the flag from one flag pole, the POW/MIA flag is flown directly below the United States flag and above any state flag.

If flying the United States flag, POW/MIA and State flags from two poles, the POW/MIA flag should be flown from the same pole as the United States flag, with the state flag flying from the pole to the left.

If flying flags from three poles, the National Colors occupy the place of prominence (the right), with the POW/MIA flag immediately to the left of the United States flag, and the state flag to the left of the POW/MIA flag.

B. RAINBOW PRIDE FLAG.

The flag pole located at City Hall shall be used to display the Rainbow Pride Flag as an expression of the City’s official sentiments in support of the LGBTQ+ community of the City of Redlands. The City of Redlands has a diverse community and is committed to supporting visibility, dignity and equality for all people in the community, and strives to be a place where all residents and visitors feel accepted and welcome.

The Rainbow Pride Flag shall be displayed on the flag pole located at City Hall for no more than 30 consecutive days in the month of June.

POLICY ON DISPLAYING THE FLAG AT HALF STAFF
All City departments shall display the flag(s) at half staff at City buildings and grounds where flags are normally displayed in accordance with this policy.

By Public Law 322, 103rd Congress, approved September 13, 1994 states, “…by order of the President, the flag shall be flown at half staff upon the death of principal figures of the United States government and the Governor of a State, territory, or possession, as a mark of respect to their memory. In the event of the death of other officials or foreign Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 534 of 546
6 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
dignitaries, the flag is to be displayed at half staff according to Presidential instructions or orders, or in accordance with recognized customs or practices not inconsistent with law.

In the event of the death of a present or former official of the government of any State, territory, or possession, the Governor of that State, territory, or possession may proclaim that the United States flag shall be flown at half staff. The flag shall be flown at half staff thirty days from the death of the President or a former President; ten days from the death of the Vice-President, the Chief Justice or a retired Chief Justice of the United States, or an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, or the Speaker of the House of Representatives; from the day of death until internment of an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, a Secretary of an executive or military department, a former VicePresident, or Governor of a State, territory, or possession; and on the day of death and the following day for a member of Congress.

Display of Flag at half staff in Honor of Deceased Person The flags of the United States, the State of California and the City of Redlands may be flown at half staff upon the death of public officials at all levels of government. When death of the public official to be so honored is verified, flags shall be flown at half staff immediately. The flags shall remain at half staff during each day they are normally flown until lowered at the end of the day on which the funeral is solemnized.

On occasions where public safety personnel are killed in the line of duty, the Redlands City Council may deem it appropriate to order all flags flown at half staff. Finally, the honor and reverence accorded this solemn act should not be diminished by the display of the flag at half staff on occasions of local tragedy.

METHOD FOR PLACING FLAG AT HALF STAFF
The flag shall be raised to the peak for an instant and then lowered to the half staff position midway between the top and the bottom of the staff. The flag should be again raised to the peak before it is lowered for the day. The flag must never touch the ground when being raised or lowered. The flag should be raised briskly and lowered slowly and ceremoniously. At no time shall any other flag be above the United States Flag. When the United States Flag is lowered to half staff position, other flags should similarly be lowered.

WHEN TO DISPLAY FLAG AT HALF STAFF
Memorial Day
The flags of the United States, the State of California and the City of Redlands are flown at half staff until 12:00 noon, and raised to the peak for the remainder of the day. This is covered by Public Law 829 passed by the 77th Congress. The flags of the United States, the State of California and the City of Redlands shall be flown at half staff on Memorial Day.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 535 of 546
7 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8439 Revised Flag Policy.doc
The POW/MIA flag shall also be flown at half staff on Memorial Day.

Veterans’ Day
The flags of the United States, the State of California and the City of Redlands shall be flown at half staff on Veterans’ Day.

The POW/MIA flag shall also be flown at half staff on Veteran’s Day.

National Korean War Veterans’ Armistice Day
National POW/MIA Day
The Council recognizes the third Friday in September of each year as a day for POW/MIA and their families throughout the City of Redlands. The City shall display the POW/MIA flag daily at all City facilities where flags are normally displayed Peace Officers Memorial Day
The United States flag will be flown at half staff at all City facilities where flags are normally displayed each year on May 15th, in accordance with Public Law 103-322 and the Congressional Joint Resolution approved October 1, 1962, designating May 15th of each year as “Peace Officers Memorial Day,” and the week in which it falls as “Police Week.”
Other Days
It is customary to honor prominent public officials holding office at the time of their deaths. City of Redlands shall use the following list:

Federal Government: President, Vice President, US Supreme Court Justice, Members of Congress and a Secretary of an executive or military department.

State Government: Governor, incumbent judge of the Superior Court or Justice Court* City Officials: City Mayors and Council Members
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 536 of 546
City Council/Successor Agency Meeting O. 2.

DATE: 05/02/2023
TO: The Successor Agency Board of Directors
SUBJECT: Approve the regular meeting minutes of April 4, 2023 (Secretary Donaldson)
MOTION:

I move to approve the regular meeting minutes of April 4, 2023 Attachments
Regular meeting minutes of April 4, 2023
Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 537 of 546

MINUTES
Regular meetings of the City Council and the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands held in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, on April 4, 2023 at 5:00 P.M.

Present:  Eddie Tejeda, Mayor
Paul Barich, Mayor Pro Tempore
Jenna Guzman-Lowery, Council Member
Mario Saucedo, Council Member

Absent: Denise Davis, Council Member
Staff: Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager; Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney; Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk; Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager; Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager; Carl Baker, Public Information Officer; Chris Catren, Police Chief; Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director; Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director; John Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director; Rich Sessler, Fire Chief

Mayor Tejeda called the meeting to order and announced there were no closed session matters scheduled for the City Council to consider. The meeting was recessed at 5:00 P.M.

RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Tejeda reconvened the meeting at 6:00 P.M. and announced that comments could be presented in-person, via Zoom, via cell phone or landline. An invocation was provided by Mayor Pro Tempore Barich. The pledge of allegiance to the American flag was conducted by the Student Lighthouse Team of Bryn Mawr Elementary School.

PRESENTATIONS
Redlands Pet Adoption
Animal Services Supervisor Jodi Kroeger and Animal Services Officer Trevor Houser introduced “Frankie”, a five-year-old female Pit Bull mix who is available for adoption, along with thirty-seven other dogs and eight cats at the Redlands Animal Shelter. Ms. Kroeger informed the Council there had been twenty-nine dogs and five cats adopted in March 2023.

Teacher of Excellence Certificates
Mayor Tejeda presented Teacher of Excellence certificates to Ana Aguirre, Krista Burgess, and Andrea Jessup of Redlands Unified School District. The Mayor noted that Jennifer Baldwin, another recipient was unable to attend tonight's meeting.

DMV/Donate Life California
CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 538 of 546
DMV/Donate Life California
Mayor Tejeda presented a Proclamation declaring the month of April 2023, as DMV/Donate Life California to John and Susan VanCampen, representing One Legacy.

Dolores Huerta Day Proclamation
Council Member Saucedo presented a Proclamation recognizing Dolores Huerta Day to Connie Aguirre, Dolores Cortez, Maria Pilar Lara, and Jessie Agnus Lara.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Teamsters Support- Rich Smith, representing the Teamsters Local 1932, stressed the importance of treating all City bargaining units with respect and dignity during labor negotiations. Over 100 additional City employees were present showing their support.

Pride Flag For and Against - Jay Zercher spoke in opposition to revising the current flag policy and flying the pride flag in June as he thought this action would cause divisiveness and discriminate against other groups. Tracy Wise and Felipe Albertao supported flying the Pride Flag as a way to show that Redlands welcomes everyone.

Various Concerns - Dennis Bell announced A.K. Smiley Library was seeking public input for the Library's 5-year strategic plan and he recommended everyone take the survey. He was concerned about the workplace culture of the Redlands Police Department and he complained that the Arrow Train had very low ridership.

Memorial Plaque - Tom Fontanes suggested the Council consider providing funds for a memorial plaque at the Palm Springs Air Museum for Dr. Robert White, in memory of his Distinguished Flying Cross.

Earth Day Support - Aaron Guest thanked the City and ANCA for their efforts in supporting the goals of Earth Day.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, the minutes of the regular meeting of March 21, 2023.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Donate Life Month Proclamation
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, the issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April, 2023 as National Donate Life Month.

CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 539 of 546
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Earth Day Proclamation
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, the issuance of a proclamation declaring April 22, 2023, as Earth Day.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month Proclamation
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, the issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2023 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Dolores Huerta Day Proclamation
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, the issuance of a proclamation declaring April 10, 2023, as Dolores Huerta Day.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Citizens' Measure T Oversight Committee Appointment
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council appointed, by roll call vote, Edward Millican (District 3) to serve a two-year term on the Measure T Oversight Committee ending March 21, 2025.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Support Letter of AB 1000 Good Neighbor Policy
Assistant City Manager McConnell provided background on AB 1000 and requested the City Council authorize Mayor Tejeda to sign a letter on behalf of the City of Redlands in support of AB 1000 Good Neighbor Policy. As public comment, Dennis Bell thought the timing was too late. Jimmy Elrod of Southwest Carpenters Union, LIUNA (Laborers Union) members Alex Zamora, Bill Quisenberry, Al Sanchez, Thomas Ruiz, Alex Artiaga, and Jose Garcia, and Bill Blankenship of NAIOP Inland Empire opposed AB 1000 stating it was a job killer, took away local control, was only recently proposed and needed more time for vetting. They encouraged the City to take more time and consider all options, such as the new bill proposed by Assemblymember Ramos.

Those in support of AB 1000 were Maria Rizvi, representing Assemblymember Eloise Reyes, who sponsored the bill, Joquin Castillejos, Felipe Albertao and a member of ICIJ. They questioned the merits of the Ramos Bill and pointed to the concerns of outdoor vendors who CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 540 of 546
are suffering health impacts from working so closely to warehouses. Andy Hoder urged the Council to seek a balance of protecting health and safety without losing sight of the economic benefits of warehouses.

Council Members discussed their concerns, including how the bill might affect local control, whether they should consider an alternative bill, AB 1748 as proposed by Assemblymember James Ramos, the idea of tabling the item for a future date, the notion of community over industry and questions surrounding the sustainability of warehouses.

On motion of Council Member Mario Saucedo, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, the City Council, by roll call vote, authorized Mayor Tejeda to sign a letter on behalf of the City in support of AB 1000 Good Neighbor Policy.

Vote: 2 - 2 Failed
NAY:  Mayor Eddie Tejeda
Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery
Bid Rejection Water and Wastewater Laboratory Services
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council rejected, by roll call vote, all bids received for Water and Wastewater Laboratory Services and directed staff to solicit new bids.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Emergency Resolution No. 8065 Report
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, to receive and file the report regarding Emergency Resolution No. 8065 proclaiming the existence of a local emergency in response to COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019).

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8455  Emergency Paramedic Services Special Tax Fire Chief Sessler reviewed Resolution No. 8455 establishing the rate for the voter-approved special tax for emergency paramedic services for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and that in 1985, the voters approved this special tax assessment necessary to fund anticipated paramedic expenses, provided the special tax rate does not exceed the maximum allowance limits as set forth in Ordinance No. 1900. As public comment, Dennis Bell wondered how much of the General Fund was being used to pay for this program and he recommended the City use Measure T funds.

On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 541 of 546
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8455 establishing the rate for the voter-approved special tax for emergency paramedic services for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8454 Intent to Vacate Street Right-of-Way On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8454 declaring the City Council's intention to vacate excess street right-of-way (Street Vacation No. 189) that is 30 feet in width and approximately 927 feet in length, and totaling approximately 28,805 square feet in area, located on the north side of Edgemont Drive along the property frontages of 212 and 226 Edgemont Drive (APNs: 0294-141-33-0000 and 0294-141-12-0000). This proposal is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Development Services Director Desatnik) Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8458 Outside City Utility Connection
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8458 for a new connection to the City of Redlands water distribution system and sewer collection system at 1231 Ansley Lane in the unincorporated community of Mentone, Tract 13514, Lot 7, Outside City Case No. 23-01; and determined that the Resolution is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15319(b) of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8456 Outside City Water Service Agreement On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8456 relating to Pre-Annexation Agreement No. 23-01 for the provision of water service to a vacant lot for a water connection and sewer connection for a proposed single-family residence on a vacant parcel located at 1231 Ansley Lane in the unincorporated community of Mentone, (APN:
029-391-07-0000); and determined that approval of this resolution is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15319 and 15303(d) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 542 of 546

Resolution No. 8459 Outside City Utility Connection
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8459 for a new connection to the City of Redlands water distribution system and sewer collection system at 1235 Ansley Lane in the unincorporated community of Mentone, Tract 13514, Lot 8, Outside City Case No. 23-02; and determined that the Resolution is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15319(b) of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8457 Outside City Water Service Agreement On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council adopted, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8457 relating to Pre-Annexation Agreement No. 23-02 for the provision of water and sewer service to a vacant lot for a proposed single-family residence on a vacant parcel located at 1235 Ansley Lane in the unincorporated community of Mentone, (APN: 029-391-08-0000) and determine that adoption of this Resolution is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15319 and 15303(d) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Support of AB 1708
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council authorized, by roll call vote, Mayor Tejeda to sign a letter on behalf of the City of Redlands in support of AB 1708.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed

COMMUNICATIONS
ANCA Earth Day Events
Mayor Tejeda introduced Richard Corneille, of Accelerate Neighborhood Climate Action (ANCA) who provided a timeline of activities planned in celebration of Saturday, April 22 Earth Day. This year the celebration is called "A Day of Climate Action in Redlands", and will offer 30 projects throughout the community, including both hands-on and educational activities. Mayor Tejeda encouraged everyone to participate in Earth Day activities and presented a Proclamation in celebration of Earth Day to Mr. Corneille and Linda Richards.

CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 543 of 546

NEW BUSINESS
Ordinance No. 2922 Re-introduction Sidewalk Vending
Assistant City Manager Boatman summarized Ordinance No. 2922 to establish regulations governing sidewalk vendors within City limits. He explained that on March 21, 2023, the City Council approved the introduction of the ordinance of the City of Redlands adding Chapter 12.45 and amending Chapter 12.44 to the Redlands Municipal Code. In 2018, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 946 which prohibits cities from banning sidewalk vending outright or from otherwise restricting sidewalk vendors in the public right-of-way and in public parks. Upon approval of the introduction of Ordinance No. 2922, staff identified a few minor revisions and typos that are necessary for clarification of the new ordinance.

In recent years, the city has seen a trend in the operation of sidewalk vendors within the city limits. Some vendors have risked the health and safety of the public by creating traffic hazards and operating without appropriate health or food handling permits. Currently, the City's Municipal Code does not contain regulations for the operation of sidewalk vendors.

Speakers opposed to the ordinance included, Eddie Sanchez, Felipe Albertao, Lyzzeth Mendoza, Neha Basu, Jessica Alocer, Yeni Ruiz, David Freidman, Tracy Wise, Alissa Slaughter, Javier Hernandez, Ana Gonzales, Joquin Castillejos, and representatives from Revolution Carts, Richard Gomez and Matt Geller. They focused on the benefits that sidewalk vendors bring to a community, such as neighborhood vitality, economic value and safer streets. They urged the Council to table the matter and take more time to thoroughly examine the proposed recommendations as submitted by Maribel Nunez from Inland Equity Community Land Trust and in partnership with Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice.

Andrea Ramirez questioned the need to re-introduce this item, supported the ordinance, as is, and thought it necessary to protect the public's health and safety and require vendors to comply with all state, county and city regulations. Through a lengthy Council Member discussion, the merits of the ordinance were debated. Mayor Pro Tem Barich and Council Member Guzman-Lowery agreed to meet as an ad hoc committee, study the recommendations as submitted by Mirable Nunez and report back to the Council.

On motion of Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, seconded by Council Member Mario Saucedo, the City Council agreed, by roll call vote, to delay the vote on the matter and authorized Mayor Pro Tem Barich and Council Member Guzman-Lowery to meet as an ad hoc committee to review the recommendations as provided by Maribel Nunez of the Inland Equity Community Land Trust and in partnership with ICIJ Coalition and report back to the City Council in May 2023.

Vote: 3 - 1 Passed
NAY:  Mayor Eddie Tejeda
CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 544 of 546

Resolution No. 8460 National Opioids Settlement Agreements City Attorney Abich Garcia presented Resolution No. 8460 regarding approval of National Opioids Settlement Agreements with Allergan, CVS, Teva, Walgreens, and Walmart. The resolution would authorize the City to participate in the national settlements with the Settling Defendants on the terms and conditions of those settlement agreements. On April 5, 2022, the City Council approved an agreement with San Bernardino County to reallocate Redlands’ portion of the settlement proceeds to be used by the County for its county-wide opioid remediation programs. These settlements, if agreed and adopted, will provide substantial funds to states and subdivisions for abatement of the opioid epidemic across the country and will impose changes in the way the Settling Defendants conduct their business with regard to the distribution of opioid medications.

On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council approved, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8460 authorizing the City to participate in the national settlements with the Settling Defendants on the terms and conditions of those settlement agreements; and authorized the City Manager to execute the referenced settlement agreements.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
PUBLIC HEARING
Ordinance No. 2955 Warehouse Projects Development & Operating Standards Mayor Tejeda declared the meeting open as a public hearing and called on Brian Foote, Planning Manager of Development Services, for a summary of Ordinance No. 2955 for Ordinance Text Amendment No. 365 to amend Title 18 (Zoning Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code to establish new development standards and operating standards for warehouse development projects within the City. The proposed ordinance would require a Conditional Use Permit for new warehouse development projects in Commercial Manufacturing (C-M), Light Industrial (M-1), General Industrial (M-2), and Industrial (I-P) zones. On February 21, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing, received public comments, and discussed the proposed ordinance. Councilmembers suggested the possibility of a prohibition on all new warehouse developments in the City, and continued the matter so that staff could research the potential for a zoning code amendment. Staff recommended it was not advisable to implement a total prohibition on new warehouse development projects, as there are very few remaining large vacant lots in the City within one mile of a freeway that could support the development of a new warehouse/distribution center.

As public comment, Jimmy Elrod, of Southwest Carpenters Union, Bill Blankenship of NAOP Inland Empire and Nicole Torstvet, Development Director of Prologis, all fully supported the new standards and recommended the Council introduce the Ordinance tonight. One written comment was received from Donald Weder, President of Seven W enterprises, Inc., expressing confidence in the Council's decision. With no further comment, Mayor Tejeda closed the public hearing. Each Council Member thanked the staff for their efforts and echoed their support of the ordinance.

CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 545 of 546
On motion of Council Member Mario Saucedo, seconded by Council Member Jenna Guzman-Lowery, the City Council introduced, by roll call vote, Ordinance No. 2955 and found that the Ordinance is exempt pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES
Mayor Pro Tem Barich encouraged everyone to participate in the Earth Day activities on April 22.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further action required the meeting adjourned at 9:07 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Redlands City Council will be held on April 18, 2023.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS
Chairman Tejeda called the meeting to order and offered anyone present the opportunity to address the Board on any subject, not already on the agenda, within the jurisdiction of the Successor Agency.

PUBLIC COMMENT
None forthcoming
Minutes
On motion of Vice Chair Barich, seconded by Board Member Guzman-Lowery, the minutes of the regular meeting of March 7, 2023 were unanimously approved, by roll call vote.

Vote:  4 – 0 Passed (Board Member Davis Absent)

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, the Successor Agency Board of Directors' meeting was adjourned at 9:08 P.M. The next regular meeting of the Agency will be held on May 2, 2023.

CC_SA_April 4, 2023

Redlands Regular Meeting of 05/02/2023 Page 546 of 546