Redlands City Council
March 17, 2026

CITY OF REDLANDS

CITY COUNCIL

A G E N D A
March 17, 2026

MARIO SAUCEDO
Mayor
District 3

MARC SHAW
Mayor Pro Tempore
District 4

PAUL BARICH
Council Member
District 5

EDDIE TEJEDA
Council Member
District 2

DENISE DAVIS
Council Member
District 1

JEANNE DONALDSON
City Clerk

PHILLIP DOOLITTLE
City Treasurer
CHARLES M. DUGGAN JR.

City Manager
YVETTE M. ABICH GARCIA
City Attorney
5:00 p.m. Open Public Meeting, Public Comment (Closed Session) 6:00 p.m. Open Session (Public Meeting)
* * *
City Council Chambers
Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, Redlands, California

A G E N D A
The following information comprises the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redlands at the times noted below in the City Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, Redlands, California, on:

Tuesday, March 17, 2026
To join via Zoom on a computer, laptop, or smart device Please visit www.zoom.us, click on Join a Meeting
Enter the Meeting ID 896 2789 8341, then run the Zoom launcher To join via Zoom with audio only (cell phone or landline) Dial 1-877-853-5247
Enter the Meeting ID 896 2789 8341
Should the City lose connectivity on Zoom, we will halt the meeting until it can be restored. To check on the status of remote connectivity in the event of an outage, go to the City's website at www.cityofredlands.org or to the City's Facebook page at @CityofRedlands or the Instagram page at @CityofRedlands_CityHall.

In the event the City cannot reestablish Zoom connectivity in a reasonable amount of time, the Mayor will adjourn the meeting to a future date.

PLEASE NOTE: Anyone desiring to speak on an agendized item at this meeting may do so during the consideration of that time. Due to time constraints and the number of persons who may wish to give oral testimony, public comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.

To provide comment while participating from Council Chambers:

Although it is not required, speakers are encouraged to submit a "Speaker Sign Up Sheet" before the meeting is convened. Forms are available in the Office of the City Clerk or in Council Chambers.

After the meeting has convened, you may place the speaker form in the basket at the table along the north wall of the Chambers. Please do not disturb the City Clerk while the meeting is in progress.

To provide comment through Zoom (on a computer, laptop, or smart device) Click the "Raise Hand" button and the moderator will unmute you when it is your turn to speak To provide comment via audio only (cell phone or landline) Dial *9 to "Raise Hand". The moderator will identity you by your area code and last 3 numbers of your telephone number when it is your turn to speak.

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES, PAGERS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC

COMMUNICATION DEVICES UPON ENTERING THE CHAMBERS
5:00 PM
A. Call City Council Meeting to Order
B. Public Comment
(Any person wishing to provide public comment on a closed session matter may do so at this time.) C. Recess City Council Meeting to a Closed Session

1. Performance Evaluations of Public Employees – Government Code §54957(b)(1) Position: City Manager

2. Conference with labor negotiator - Government Code §54957.6 (Assistant City Manager McConnell)
Agency Negotiators:

John Bakhit, Janice McConnell, Robert Meteau, Jorge Castillo Employee Organizations:

Redlands Association of Department Directors
Redlands Association of Management Employees
Redlands Association of Mid-Management Employees
Redlands Association of Safety Management Employees
Redlands Association of Fire Management Employees
Redlands Police Officers Association
Redlands Professional Firefighters Association
Redlands Civilian Safety Employees
Teamsters Local 1932 Redlands Chapter

3. Conference with legal counsel: Existing Litigation - Government Code §54956.9(d)(1) (City Attorney Garcia)
One Case:

1. Coyote Aviation v. City of Redlands, et al. San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No.

CIVSB2418252
D. Reconvene City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m.

E. Invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw - Pledge of Allegiance by Kingsbury Elementary School (In keeping with long-standing traditions of legislative invocations, this City Council meeting may include a brief invocation. Such invocations are not intended to proselytize or advance any one, or to disparage any other, faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular religious belief or form of invocation.) F. Closed Session Report
(No reportable action taken in closed session unless otherwise announced by the City Attorney at this time.) G. Presentations
H. Public Comment
I. Consent Calendar
(The following routine items have been recommended for approval and will be acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Councilmember or a member of the audience.)

1. Approve minutes of the regular meeting March 3, 2026 (City Clerk Donaldson)

2. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring March 31, 2026, as Cesar E. Chavez Day (Mayor Saucedo)

3. Approve the purchase of a 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in the amount of $20,000 and approve a supplemental appropriation for the same amount from the General Fund unassigned fund balance
(Fire Chief Sessler)

4. Adopt Resolution No. 8756 dissolving the Redlands Financing Authority and terminating the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999
(Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)

5. Approve the Termination of License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC for the use of 30 parking spaces on City-owned property located at 1625 W. Redlands Blvd. and Authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the Letter of Termination of a License Agreement (Assistant City Manager Boatman)

6. Approve a $50,000 contribution for the 2026 Fourth of July Celebration to the Redlands 4th of July Committee and determine that the financial support serves a public benefit and approve the additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000
(Facilities and Community Services Department Director Crocker) J. Communications

1. Discussion and possible action relating to the designation of Voting Delegates to represent the City at the 2026 Regional Conference of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and General Assembly
(Mayor Saucedo)

2. Annual Report of the Cultural Arts Commission given by Chairman Daniel Gohman (Facilities and Community Services Director Crocker)

3. Receive and file the Annual Report from the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025 (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)

4. Receive and file FY 2026 Mid-Year General Fund Review (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)
K. Public Hearings

1. Public Hearing to consider the following applications for an approximately 8.5-acre site located at the northeast corner of Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street within the Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan (APNs: 0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167- 171-12-0000), by applicant Regency Centers:
a) Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in accordance with Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act b) Measure U Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
c) Amendment to the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan to remove the project site (8.5 acres) from the boundaries of Specific Plan 40 and remove the Special Development (EV/SD) District designation d) To change the zoning designation 8.5-acre project site from Special Development (EV/SD) District to General Commercial (C-3) District
e) A site plan approval and architectural design review to construct a commercial shopping center with approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space consisting of one major tenant grocery building (36,000 square feet), one drive-through restaurant building (3,900 square feet), four multi-tenant shop buildings (6,600 to 10,000 square feet) and related on-site and off-site improvements including a parking lot, driveways, landscaping, lighting, utilities and drainage improvements f) A Conditional Use Permit to establish a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control license for a proposed 36,000 square-foot grocery store and to construct and operate a 3,900 square foot drivethrough restaurant g) A request to merge three parcels within the project site into one parcel totaling approximately 8.5 acres Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing
(Assistant City Manager Boatman)

2. Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 8758 Overruling Objections and Proceeding with the Weed Abatement of Subject Properties
Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing
(Fire Chief Sessler)
L. New Business

1. Consideration of Resolution No. 8757 Updating the City's Fund Balance Policy and Rescission of Resolution No. 7346
(Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)

2. Consideration of the recommendation for appointment of three (3) Trustees to the Board of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation
(Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)

3. Consideration of Resolution No. 8767 Amending the Bylaws of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation
(Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)

4. Consideration of a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc., for Master Construction Management Services for State Street City Hall to increase the total agreement to an amount not to exceed $2,108,510, approval of an additional appropriation, and determination that this action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Assistant City Manager Boatman)

5. Consideration of a First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Sartin Properties, LLC (Facilities and Community Services Department Director Crocker) M. Individual Council Member Announcements and/or Reports on Activities (No collective discussion or action.)
N. Adjournment
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on April 7, 2026.

O. Redlands Public Improvement Corporation

1. Call regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation

2. Public Comment - Redlands Public Improvement Corporation (At this time, the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation will provide an opportunity for the public to address them on any subject, within its jurisdiction, which is not already scheduled on the agenda.

However, any matter that requires action will be referred to staff for a report and possible action at a subsequent meeting. Comments will be limited to three {3} minutes.)

3. Consideration of Resolution No. 2026-01 Amending Bylaws of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation
(Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)

4. Adjourn Redlands Public Improvement Corporation
If you challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this agenda in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Goutam Dobey, of the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department at (909) 798-7584 ext 2. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
(28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
Any writings or documents distributed to a majority of the City Council Regarding an open session agenda item less than 72 hours before this meeting are available for public inspection at the City Clerk's Office or at the dais of the City Clerk once the open session begins.

Staff reports or other written documentation relating to items referred to on the agenda are available at the A. K. Smiley Public Library, 125 West Vine Street, Redlands, California, and on the City's Website referenced below.

Regular meetings are televised live on Redlands TV Channel 3 (Spectrum) and Channel 35 (Frontier) and re-broadcast at 7:00 P.M. The following Wednesday, Friday and Sunday; and at 9:00 A.M. Thursday, Saturday, and Monday. Meetings are also streamed live and archived for later viewing on demand on the City's website at www.cityofredlands.org. Agendas, staff reports and minutes of the City Council of the City of Redlands are available online at: www.cityofredlands.org Date Posted: March 12, 2026
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.  I1.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve minutes of the regular meeting March 3, 2026 (City Clerk Donaldson ) MOTION:

I move to approve the regular meeting minutes of March 3, 2026.

Attachments
030326_CC.pdf

MINUTES
Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redlands held in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, on March 3, 2026 at 5:00 P.M.

Present:  Mario Saucedo, Mayor
Paul Barich, Council Member
Eddie Tejeda, Council Member
Denise Davis, Council Member

Absent: Marc Shaw, Mayor Pro Tem
Staff: Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager; Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney; Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk; Phillip Doolittle, City Treasurer; Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager; Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager; Carl Baker, Public Information Officer; Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director; Rich Sessler, Fire Chief; Rachel Tolber, Police Chief; Tabitha Crocker, Facilities and Community Services Director; Robert Meteau, HR/Risk Management Director; Ray Casey, Interim Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director
Mayor Saucedo called the meeting to order and explained that comments could be presented in-person, via Zoom, via cell phone or landline. He offered the public an opportunity to provide comment on any item on the agenda for the closed session.

PUBLIC COMMENT
None forthcoming
CLOSED SESSION
Conference with legal counsel: Existing Litigation - Government Code §54956.9(d)(1) (City Attorney Garcia)
One Case:

Coyote Aviation v. City of Redlands, et al. San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No.

CIVSB2418252

1. Conference with Legal Counsel: Initiation of Litigation - Government Code §54956.9(d)(4) (City Attorney Garcia)
Two (2) Cases
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The meeting reconvened at 6:00 P.M. with an invocation by Mayor Saucedo. The Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag was conducted by Highland Grove Elementary School.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
CC_March 3, 2026

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Garcia announced the following actions were taken during the closed session:

Item 1 - No reportable action
Item 2 - The City Council authorized its legal counsel to initiate litigation in two cases. The defendants and other details of the case shall, once formally commenced, be disclosed upon inquiry. Motion to authorize the litigation was made by Council Member Tejeda and seconded by Council Member Barich and passed unanimously. She noted that Mayor Pro Tem Shaw was absent from closed session tonight.

PRESENTATIONS
Redlands Pet Adoption
Animal Services Supervisor Joe Alcarez and Kennel Attendant Hailey Stuck showed off  "Sourdough", a one-year-old male German Shepherd, who is available for adoption, along with twenty-six other dogs and seven cats at the Redlands Animal Shelter. Mr. Alcarez provided the Shelter statistics for February 2026, which included 16 adopted dogs and 14 dogs returned to their owner.

Proclamation Women's History Month
Mayor Saucedo presented the Women's History Month Proclamation to Gayle Howard, recognizing all her accomplishments and activities within the community, and he gave praise to all women.

Proclamation Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month Mayor Saucedo presented the Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month Proclamation to Nathan and Lisa McCool.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Downtown Altercation - Baron Bowman was deeply shaken by the recent altercation outside his establishment on Citrus Avenue, on Sunday, February 22, that resulted in an attempted vehicular homicide and shots fired. He has implemented enhanced security protocols, making safety the top priority, and has continued to work with the Redlands Police Department.

Super Rock Star Walk n Roll Event - Arrisa Owen and Careen Garcia, of the Redlands Special Education PTA, invited everyone to attend the "Super Rock Star Walk n Roll" event scheduled for March 28 at Citrus Valley High School from 10:00 to 2:00. This high-energy music-themed walking, rolling, and strolling experience is open to all abilities designed to celebrate inclusion and build community engagement. The event is co-sponsored by Common Vision Coalition Downtown Altercation - Dennis Bell commended the owner of The Underground for his efforts to mitigate unwanted activity near his establishment, and he thanked the police for quickly arresting the alleged driver of the hit-and-run.

Maintaining a Safe Downtown - David Williams and Jose Ugarte expressed serious concerns about the recent violence on Citrus Avenue. They found it alarming and asked the City to consider instituting foot patrols, increasing regular patrols, and closing Citrus Avenue to vehicles at night. They urged the Council to preserve and maintain a family-friendly downtown, where everyone feels safe.

CC_March 3, 2026

Licensed Engineer - Stephen Rogers urged the City to hire a licensed engineer to oversee the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department, and he voiced concerns about the ongoing construction of ADUs on Hilltop.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously approved, by roll call vote, the regular meeting minutes of February 17, 2026.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Women's History Month Proclamation
On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously authorized, by roll call vote, the issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of March 2026 as Women's History Month.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
March 2026 Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month Proclamation On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously authorized, by roll call vote, the issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of March 2026 as Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8754 Local Officials to Complete Fiscal & Financial Training On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously adopted, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8754 designating Local Agency Officials required to complete Fiscal and Financial Training pursuant to Senate Bill 827 (Government Code Section 53238, et seq.).

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8755 Local Officials to Complete Ethics Training On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously adopted, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8755 designating Local Agency Officials required to complete Ethics Training in compliance with Assembly Bill 1234 (Government Code Section 53234, et seq.), as expanded by Senate Bill 827.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Accept 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program Funding Award CC_March 3, 2026

Accept 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program Funding Award On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously accepted, by roll call vote, the Federal Emergency Management Agency 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program funds in the amount of $14,501 for the purchase of portable radios, and approved an additional appropriation for the same.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Resolution No. 8753 Delegating Investment Authority to the City Treasurer On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously adopted, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8753 delegating Investment Authority to the City Treasurer pursuant to Government Code Section 53607.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
First Amendment Systems & Software
On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously approved, by roll call vote, the First Amendment with Systems & Software, Inc. for Software License, Services, Support, Maintenance, and Hosting Services, to amend Section 2.1.1 clarifying the licensing language by explicitly distinguishing between perpetual and subscription-based licenses and confirming that the software stated in the agreement is perpetually licensed. The amendment is clarifying in nature and does not modify the scope of services, term, or cost of the Agreement.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Ordinance No. 3000 Electric Bicycles
Police Chief Tolber briefly explained Ordinance No. 3000, amending Chapter 10.56 of the Municipal Code relating to bicycles to establish regulations governing the use of electric bicycles was initially discussed during the February 17, 2026 City Council meeting. She said the ordinance is intended to address public safety concerns associated with increased e-bike usage, align local regulations with California state law, and provide clear operational standards for e-bike users, ensuring consistency and facilitating enforcement. This alignment is crucial for maintaining public safety and supporting state objectives.

As public comment, Stephen Rogers supported the ordinance but cited concerns about the implementation and enforcement protocols. Michael Paisner wondered whether the proposed regulations were in line with the recently approved California state E-bike law. Chief Tolber clarified that while the California Vehicle Code covers general bicycle regulations, this local ordinance, in part, addresses e-bike usage on city property, such as parks. She reiterated the proposed ordinance aligns with state law.

On motion of Council Member Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Eddie Tejeda, the City CC_March 3, 2026

On motion of Council Member Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Eddie Tejeda, the City Council unanimously adopted, by roll call vote, Ordinance No. 3000 amending Chapter 10.56 of the Redlands Municipal Code relating to bicycles to establish regulations governing the use of electric bicycles.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Donation 2026 Toyota Highlander for Police Department Citizen Volunteers On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously accepted, by roll call vote, the donation of a 2026 Toyota Highlander for the Redlands Police Department's Citizen Volunteers, valued at the amount of $50,675.00, from the Redlands Police Community Foundation.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Sole Source PO with West Coast Lights & Sirens
On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously approved, by roll call vote, the sole source purchase order with West Coast Lights & Sirens to purchase Getac mounts in the amount of $59,558.98.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
In-Kind Support Art-On-State-Street Event
On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously determined, by roll call vote, that the approval of the event is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15311(c) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; approved the expenditure of city resources and in-kind support in the amount of $2,565.00; and approved the temporary street closures detailed in the staff report for the Art-On-State-Street Event, which will be held on Sunday, March 15, 2026.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
In-Kind Support Redlands Bicycle Classic Event
Facilities and Community Services Director Crocker introduced the request for in-kind support in the amount of $130,607.96 for the Redlands Bicycle Classic event hosted by Redlands Bicycle Classic, Inc., on April 9th through 12th, 2026. As a registered non-profit organization, the Redlands Bicycle Classic, Inc. is requesting to host their annual Bicycle Classic in Redlands on April 9th through the 12th, 2026. This will be their 40th year holding this event. They intend to provide a family-friendly atmosphere featuring different bicycle class races, rides, music, vendors, food and two beer gardens.

The in-kind support is for departmental resources, including Police, Fire and Facilities and Community Services department personnel, and they anticipate 30,000 attendees, with participation from more than 30 vendors.

As public comment, Dennis Bell thought the attendance figures in the staff report were inflated and did not reflect the actual turnout. He likened the vendor area to a flea market, said the in-kind request amount was excessive and should be used to fund more important, critical needs facing the city.

CC_March 3, 2026

Council Member Barich pointed out that the event brings tremendous value to the City by drawing large crowds, filling hotels and restaurants, and the City directly benefits from the collection of the Transient Occupancy Tax as a source of revenue, as well.

On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously determined, by roll call vote, that the authorization for the items associated with the Redlands Bicycle Classic event are exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15311(c) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; authorized and approved the expenditure of city resources and in-kind support in the amount of $130,607.96; authorized and approved the temporary street closures as detailed in the staff report for the Redlands Bicycle Classic to be held on April 9th through April 12th, 2026; and authorized the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages at the event.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
License Agreement to Operate Food Truck at Cty's Corporate Yard On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously determined, by roll call vote, that approval of the License Agreement with Fortino Vizcaino, dba 4Tinos, is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines; and approved the License Agreement with Fortino Vizcaino, dba 4Tinos, to operate a food truck at the City's Corporate Yard.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Sole Source PO Mobile Crash Barriers
On motion of Council Member Paul Barich, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously determined, by roll call vote, that approval of a sole source purchase order with Meridian Rapid Defense Group is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved a sole source purchase order with Meridian Rapid Defense Group for the purchase of mobile crash barriers in an amount not-to-exceed $71,343.34.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
First Amendment to Agreement for Code Enforcement Services On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously approved, by roll call vote, the First Amendment to the Agreement with Willdan Engineering to increase the total amount from $75,000 to $180,000 for the Professional Services Agreement providing code enforcement services.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
NEW BUSINESS
CC_March 3, 2026

Resolution No. 8760 Measure I Continuation Expenditure Plan City Manager Duggan introduced Otis Greer, Deputy Executive Director of San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), who provided background on Measure I, explaining that it is a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax originally approved by San Bernardino County voters in 1989 and renewed in 2004. The measure provides dedicated funding for transportation improvements throughout the County and is currently set to expire on April 1, 2040. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) is proposing a continuation of Measure I beyond 2040, which is anticipated to be placed before voters on the November 3, 2026 ballot. If approved by voters, the continuation would maintain the existing one-half of one percent sales tax rate without increasing taxes and is estimated to generate approximately $7.5 billion over its first 30 years.

Revenues would remain within San Bernardino County and would continue to be dedicated exclusively to transportation-related purposes.

The Expenditure Plan includes return-to-source provisions, annual local audits, biennial SBCTA audits, and continued oversight by an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 180206, the Expenditure Plan must be approved by the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities representing a majority of the incorporated population in order to place the measure before voters. Participating jurisdictions are being asked to consider the Resolution in advance of the deadlines necessary to place the measure on the November 2026 ballot.

Resolution No. 8760, if adopted, would approve the Measure I Continuation Expenditure Plan Developed by SBCTA.

City Manager Duggan and Mayor Saucedo highlighted the importance of Measure I revenues, which have directly benefited the City. As public comment, Stephen Rogers said that when the voters originally approved Measure I, they likely did not intend for SBCTA to become such a powerful force and have control over all transportation work in the region. He raised concerns about two projects in particular, the Express Lanes for Interstate 10 and the Arrow rail project.

On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Paul Barich, the City Council unanimously adopted, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 8760 approving the Measure I Continuation Expenditure Plan developed by San Bernardino County Transportation Authority.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Contract Award Water Facilities Generators Project
Interim Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Casey reviewed the Public Works Construction Contract with CSI Services for the Water Facilities Generators Project in an amount not-to-exceed $3,477,000. The American Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) requires community water systems to perform a risk and resiliency assessment to evaluate water utility best practices and potential vulnerabilities to malevolent acts or natural hazards that threaten the security or resiliency of a community water system. It was recommended that Redlands install emergency power supply systems at the Agate Pump Station, 5th Avenue Pump Station, Country Club Pump Station, and Texas Street Pump Station. As public comment, Stephen Rogers expressed concerns regarding the City's phased approach to the project, suggesting a piecemeal review may violate CEQA's requirement for a comprehensive analysis of the entire project.

CC_March 3, 2026

On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Paul Barich, the City Council unanimously determined, by roll call vote, that approval of the contract and construction of the Water Facilities Generators Project as categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15303 of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; approved the Water Facilities Generators Project Plans and Specifications; and awarded a Public Works Construction Contract to CSI Services for an amount not-to-exceed $3,477,000.

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
Real Property Purchase and Sale Agreement
Assistant City Manager Boatman detailed the Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Sartin Properties, LLC., for the sale of Assessor Parcel Number 0168-343-01-0000 in the amount of $250,000. The City owns approximately 4.67 acres of real property located in the community of Mentone, generally situated north of Mentone Avenue and south of Mill Creek Road. Staff negotiated the PSA between the City, as seller, and Sartin Properties, LLC, as buyer, for the sale of the property for $250,000. The agreement requires a $1,000 earnest money deposit and provides the buyer with a 30-day due diligence period during which the buyer may investigate the property and terminate the agreement at its discretion. If the buyer proceeds, the deposit becomes non-refundable and is credited toward the purchase price at closing. The property will be conveyed in its existing “as-is” condition by grant deed. The buyer has stated that the intended use of the property is agricultural. Approval of the agreement authorizes the transfer of ownership only and does not approve or entitle any future development of the property. The Surplus Land Act (Government Code Sections 54220 et seq.) applies to the disposition of land by a local agency. The proposed sale is subject to, and consistent with, the applicable requirements of the Surplus Land Act.

As public comment, Trevor Casey of Regioncy Real Estate, was concerned with the language in Section 6.1.6, stating the buyer was required to prepare and submit a written design and plans for a mixed-use (commercial retail and residential, and public parking) project on the property. He questioned whether a market analysis and appraisal had been conducted and claimed that the purchase price, in his opinion, was well below market value. Stephen Rogers also stated the purchase price seemed to be below market value, and he questioned if the City was in compliance with the Surplus Land Act procedures. Assistant City Manager Boatman clarified that a local real estate broker provided a market analysis and an appraisal was performed on the property. Additionally, the buyer intends the property for agricultural use. City Attorney Garcia recommended that the language in Section 6.1.6 be deleted and replaced with [Reserved].

On motion of Council Member Eddie Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Denise Davis, the City Council unanimously determined, by roll call vote, that approval of the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Sartin Properties, LLC., is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and approved the Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended, with Sartin Properties, LLC., for the sale of Assessor Parcel Number 0168-343-01-0000. The language in Section 6.1.6 is to be deleted and replaced with [Reserved].

Vote: 4 - 0 Passed
CC_March 3, 2026

COUNCIL MEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES
Mayor Saucedo participated in the Family Service Association's Annual Board Installation and Welcome event and attended the Light of the World Career Day, Mayor Pro Tem Shaw submitted his report of activities for the month of February 2026, as available online and attached to the staff report.

Council Member Barich was recovering from a cold.

Council Member Tejeda held his public safety "check-ins" with the police and fire departments, met with a downtown business owner, and attended the community swearing-in and State of the District event for Senator Eloise Gomez Reyes, held at San Bernardino Valley College.

Council Member Davis had a one-on-one meeting with Omnitrans CEO/General Manager Erin Rogers and hosted the Youth Council meeting where students heard from Nicole Ramos, Director of Marketing for Omnitrans. She attended the community swearing-in and State of the District event for Senator Eloise Gomez Reyes, met with the Climate Policy group, and separately met with Sustainability Coordinator, Kaitlyn Haberlin and Linda Richards of ANCA. She participated in the Teamsters Power Hour radio show, and gave a presentation, with David Rabindranath, to Inland So Cal Housing Collective about the City's Homekey Project.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further action required the meeting adjourned at 7:26 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Redlands City Council will be held on March 17, 2026.

CC_March 3, 2026

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I2.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring March 31, 2026, as Cesar E.

Chavez Day (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

I move to authorize the issuance of a proclamation declaring March 31, 2026, as Cesar E. Chavez Day.

Attachments
Cesar Chavez Day 2026.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I3.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the purchase of a 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in the amount of $20,000 and approve a supplemental appropriation for the same amount from the General Fund unassigned fund balance (Fire Chief Sessler )
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

1. I move to approve the purchase of the 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in the amount of $20,000, and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to complete the transaction; and

2. Approve an additional appropriation in the amount $20,000 from the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund to cover the cost of the purchase.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Sole Source purchase of the 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in the amount of $20,000 and approve an additional appropriation of $20,000 from the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund. Purchasing the ambulance will ensure continuity of service, maintain response reliability, and retain a fully operational unit as a permanent resource to support the City’s Emergency Medical Services.

DISCUSSION:

Since February 2022, the Redlands Fire Department has utilized a 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance through a nocost Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Big Bear Fire Authority and the City of Redlands. The Department greatly appreciates the Big Bear Fire Authority’s partnership and support over the past four years, which has enabled the City to enhance its emergency medical service capabilities through use of this vehicle.

The ambulance has been operated as an Alternate Transport Vehicle (ATV) in accordance with Inland Counties Emergency Medical Agency (ICEMA) Emergency Directive #2021.09.30. Under this directive, fire departments are authorized to place ATVs into service when an Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance, an Assistance-by-Hire ALS ambulance, or a Basic Life Support (BLS) ambulance is unavailable or experiencing a delay greater than nine minutes and fifty-nine seconds (9:59).

The City would now like to purchase the 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in order to continue providing ambulance service without interruption. Acquiring the vehicle will allow the City to retain this unit as a permanent resource, ensure continuity of service, and support the Redlands Fire Department’s ongoing commitment to delivering reliable, professional Emergency Medical Services to the community.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may elect not to approve the purchase of the 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance and the associated supplemental appropriation. In that case, the Fire Department would discontinue use of the vehicle and evaluate alternative options to maintain ambulance service and response reliability.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Priority B - Public Health & Safety
SUBMITTED BY:

Rich Sessler, Fire Chief
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:

Bruni Reyes, Management Analyst

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 2026
Revenue Generating: No
Amount: $20,000
Budgeted Y/N: No
Account No.:

Additional Appropriation Required: Yes
Discussion:

The total cost for the purchase of the 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance is $20,000. Funding for this purchase is recommended to come from the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund through an additional appropriation.

This is a one-time expenditure and does not create any ongoing financial obligations for the City. Utilizing the unassigned fund balance ensures that the purchase can be made without impacting the City’s operating budget or ongoing programs.

Attachments
Additional_App.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I4.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 8756 dissolving the Redlands Financing Authority and terminating the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999 (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia )
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 8756 dissolving the Redlands Financing Authority (RFA).

2. Approve the termination of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999 creating the RFA.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution No. 8756 dissolving the Redlands Financing Authority (RFA) and approve the termination of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999 creating the RFA.

DISCUSSION:

The Redlands Financing Authority (RFA) was established in 1999 as a joint exercise of powers entity by and between the City of Redlands and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands, pursuant to California Government Code joint powers authority provisions and the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985. The RFA historically served as a financing conduit for City utility revenue bond issuances (water, wastewater, and solid waste), and the last debt maturity associated with those financings occurred in 2017.

This item is being brought forward as a matter of fiscal housekeeping and records cleanup. Staff has confirmed the RFA has no open trustee or fiscal agent accounts, no continuing disclosure obligations remain, and the RFA holds no assets. Accordingly, dissolution will not require any asset distribution or account closure actions beyond formal termination and internal record updates.

The JPA creating the RFA is dated May 1, 1999 and expressly creates the “Redlands Financing Authority” as a joint exercise of powers entity between the City and the former Redevelopment Agency. The JPA authorizes the RFA to assist in financing public purposes and provides broad powers, including the ability to purchase, hold, and sell bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, and to issue, sell, and deliver bonds for authorized purposes.

In 2012, California dissolved all redevelopment agencies statewide (effective February 1, 2012) and shifted enforceable obligation administration to successor agencies under state dissolution law. In Redlands, the Successor Agency’s remaining wind-down activities have concluded as of July 2024. Because the RFA’s founding JPA was between the City and the former Redevelopment Agency, and because the Authority has no ongoing financing program or remaining obligations, staff recommends formal termination of the JPA and dissolution of the RFA to align the City’s legal entities with current operational reality.

The JPA provides that the Authority continues to exercise its powers “until the termination of this Agreement or until the City and the Agency shall have mutually rescinded this Agreement.” The JPA further provides that, upon termination, “all assets of the Authority shall be distributed to the respective grantors and assignors thereof.” As noted above, staff has confirmed there are no assets to distribute; therefore, dissolution is procedurally straightforward.

For context, the RFA adopted meeting schedule provisions aligning regular RFA meetings with the second regular City Council meeting dates in January, May, and September. The recommended dissolution will eliminate the need for maintaining separate Authority governance mechanics for an inactive entity.

ALTERNATIVES:

Council may choose to modify, reject or table this item.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
SUBMITTED BY:

Danielle Garcia, Management Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: None
Discussion: There is no fiscal impact as a result of adopting Resolution No. 8756 and the termination of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement.

Attachments
JPA_between_City_RDA.pdf
Resolution_No_8756.pdf

JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
by and between the

CITY OF REDLANDS
and the

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS
creating the

REDLANDS FINANCING AUTHORITY
Dated as ofMay 1, 1999
DOCSLAI 2911391

JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of May 1, 1999 ( this " Agreement"), by and between the CITY OF REDLANDS, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California( the " City"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS, a public body, corporate and politic, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the " Agency"),
WITNESSETH.

WHEREAS, Articles 1, 2 and 4 of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California ( the " Act") authorize the City and the Agency to create a point exercise of powers entity (the " Redlands Financing Authority" or the " Authority") which has the power to jointly exercise any powers common to the City and the Agency and to exercise the powers granted to it under the Act,
WHEREAS, the City and the Agency are each empowered by law to undertake certain projects and programs,
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to buy, sell and lease property and to issue bonds, expend bond proceeds, and borrow and loan money for certain public purposes pursuant to the Government Code of the State of California,
WHEREAS, the Agency is authorized to buy, sell and lease property and to issue bonds, expend bond proceeds, and borrow and loan money for any of its corporate purposes pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State ofCalifornia, WHEREAS, Article 4 of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the " Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985") authorizes DOCSLA1 2911391
and empowers the Authority to issue bonds and to purchase bonds issued, or to make loans to, the Agency or the City for financing public capital improvements, working capital, liability and other insurance needs, or projects whenever there are significant public benefits, as determined by the Agency or the City, as the case may be,
WHEREAS, the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 further authorizes and empowers the Authority to sell bonds so issued or purchased to public or private purchasers at public or negotiated sale, and
WHEREAS, by this Agreement, the City and the Agency desire to create and establish the Redlands Financing Authority for the purposes set forth herein and to exercise the powers described herein,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Agency, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, do agree as follows SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1 shall for all purposes ofthis Agreement have the meanings herein specified Act
The term "Act" shall mean Articles 1, 2 and 4 of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California, including the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, as amended
ARencv
The term " Agency" shall mean the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands, a public body, corporate and politic, duly organized and existing under and by virtue ofthe laws of the State of California
DOCSLAI 2911391 2-
Authonty
The term " Authority" shall mean the Redlands Financing Authority created by this Agreement
Board
The term `Board" shall mean the governing board of the Authority Bond Purchase Agreement
The term " Bond Purchase Agreement" shall mean an agreement of the Authority to purchase bonds or any other evidence of indebtedness of the Agency or the City solely from funds received from the Authority' s simultaneous sale of such bonds or any other evidence of indebtedness to the purchaser or purchasers named therein, on the terms and conditions set forth therein
Bonds
The term " Bonds" shall mean bonds and any other evidence of indebtedness of the Authority authorized and issued pursuant to the Act CLt-Y
The term " City" shall mean the municipal corporation known as the City of Redlands, a general law city duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California.

Law
The term " Law" means the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (being Part I of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, as amended) and Article I I of Chapter 3 of Part I of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and all laws amendatory thereof or supplemental thereto OCSLAI 2911391 3-
member of the Board shall terminate when such member of the Board shall cease to be the Mayor or a member of the City Council, and the successor to the Mayor or such member of the City Council shall thereupon become a member ofthe Board Members of the Board shall not receive any compensation for serving as such, but shall be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses actually incurred in connection with serving as a member if the Board shall determine that such expenses shall be reimbursed and there are unencumbered funds available for such purpose
C MeetmRs ofBoard
1) Rel7ular Meetings The Board shall hold at least one regular meeting each year, and, by resolution, may provide for the holding of regular meetings at more frequent intervals The date upon which, and the hour and place at which, each such regular meeting shall be held shall be fixed by resolution ofthe Board 2) Le]?al Notice All meetings of the Board shall be called, noticed, held and conducted subject to the provisions of the Ralph M Brown Act (Chapter 9 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (Sections 54950- 54961)) or any successor legislation hereinafter enacted
3) Minutes The secretary of the Authority shall cause minutes of all meetings of the Board to be kept and shall, as soon as possible after each meeting, cause a copy of the minutes to be forwarded to each member ofthe Board and to the City and the Agency 4) Ouorum A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum may adjourn meetings from time to time
DOCSLAI 2911391 5-
D Officers, Duties. Bonds
1) The Officers of the Authority shall be the Chair, Vice-Chair, Executive Director, Secretary, Treasurer and Controller With the exception of the Treasurer and Controller, the officers of the Authority shall be the persons serving in those offices of the City specified in the By-Laws of the Authority adopted by the Board and shall have the powers vested in them pursuant to such By-Laws and such other powers as may be granted by the Board from time to time by resolution
2) The Treasurer of the City is hereby designated as Treasurer of the Authority Subject to the applicable provisions of any trust agreement, indenture or resolution providing for a trustee or other fiscal agent, the Treasurer is designated as the depositary of the Authority to have custody of all the money ofthe Authority, from whatever source, and, as such, shall have the powers, duties and responsibilities specified in Section 6505 5 ofthe Act 3) The Treasurer of the City is hereby designated as Controller of the Authority, and, as such, shall have the powers, duties and responsibilities specified in Section 6505 5 of the Act The Controller shall draw checks to pay demands against the Authority when such demands have been approved by the Authority 4) The City shall determine the charges to be made against the Authority for the services ofthe Treasurer and Controller 5) The Treasurer and Controller ofthe Authority are designated as the public officers or persons who have charge of, handle, or have access to any property of the Authonty, and each such officer shall file an official bond in the amount of$25, 000 as required by Section 6505 1 ofthe Act, provided, that such bond shall not be required ifthe Authority does DOCSLAI 2911391 6-
not possess or own property or funds with an aggregate value of greater than $ 500 00 ( excluding amounts held by a trustee or other fiduciary in connection with any Bonds) b) The Board shall have the power to appoint such other officers and employees as it may deem necessary and to retain independent counsel, consultants and accountants
SECTION 5 POWERS
The Authority shall have such powers as may be exercised under the Act in order to assist the City and the Agency in financing capital improvements, working capital, liability and other insurance needs or projects wherever the City or the Agency, as the case may be, shall determine that there are significant public benefits to be derived from such assistance The Authority shall have the power to purchase, with the amounts received or to be received by it pursuant to a Bond Purchase Agreement, bonds issued by the Agency under the Law or bonds or other evidences of indebtedness issued by the City at public or negotiated sale, for the purposes set forth in Section 2 hereof, all in accordance with the Act Any such bonds or other evidences of indebtedness so purchased may be held by the Authority or sold to public or private purchasers at public or negotiated sale, in whole or in part The Authority shall set any other terms and conditions on any purchase or sale of bonds or other evidences of indebtedness contemplated herein as it deems to be necessary, appropriate and in the public interest, in furtherance ofthe Act
The Authority shall have the power, in its own name, to by, sell or lease property and to issue, sell and deliver Bonds for any purpose authorized under the Act.

The Authority is authorized, in its own name, to do all acts necessary for the exercise of said powers for said purposes, including but not limited to any or all ofthe following DOCSLAI 2911391 7-
to make and enter into contracts, to employ agents and employees, and to sue and be sued 1n its own name
Except as otherwise provided herein, such power shall be exercised subject only to such restrictions upon the manner of exercising such power as are imposed upon the City in the exercise of similar powers, as provided in Section 6509 ofthe Act Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority shall have any additional powers conferred under the Act or under applicable law, insofar as such additional powers may be necessary to accomplish the purposes set forth in Section 2 hereof SECTION 6. TERMINATION OF POWERS
Subject to the provisions of Section 16, the Authority shall continue to exercise the powers herein conferred upon it until the termination of this Agreement or until the City and the Agency shall have mutually rescinded thus Agreement SECTION 7 FISCAL YEAR
Unless and until changed by resolution of the Board, the fiscal year of the Authority shall be the period from July 1 of each year to and including the following June 30, except for the first fiscal year which shall be the period from the date of this Agreement to June 30, 1999

SECTION S DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
At the end of the term hereof or upon the earlier termination of this Agreement as set forth in Section 6 hereof, all assets of the Authority shall be distributed to the respective grantors and assignors thereof
DOCS LA 1 2911391 8-
SECTION 9. CONTRIBUTIONS AND ADVANCES
Contributions or advances of public funds and of personnel, equipment or property may be made to the Authority by the City and the Agency for any of the purposes of this Agreement Payment of public funds may be made to defray the cost of any such contribution Any such advance shall be made subject to repayment, and shall be repaid, in the manner agreed upon by the City or the Agency, as the case may be, and the Authority at the time of making such advance It is mutually understood and agreed that neither the City nor the Agency has any obligation to make advances or contributions to the Authority to provide for the costs and expenses of administration of the Authority, even though either may do so The City or the Agency may allow the use of personnel, equipment or property in lieu of other contributions or advances to the Authority
SECTION 10 AGREEMENT NOT EXCLUSIVE
This Agreement shall not be exclusive and shall not be deemed to amend or alter the terms of other agreements between the City and the Agency, except as the terms of this Agreement shall conflict therewith, in which case the terms ofthis Agreement shall prevail SECTION 11 ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS
The Authority shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good accounting practice The books and records of the Authority shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by the City and the Agency and their representatives The Authority shall give an audited written report of all financial activities for each fiscal year to the City and the Agency within 210 days after the close of each fiscal year The Controller of the Authority shall either make or contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant to make an annual audit of the accounts and records of DOCSLAI 2911391 9-
RESOLUTION NO 5636

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSED FORM OF JOINT EXERCISE OF

POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDLANDS AND THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS,

CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the City of Redlands ( the " City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands (the " Agency") desire to create and establish, pursuant to the laws of the State of California, the Redlands Financing Authority (the " Authority"), and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this meeting a proposed form ofJoint exercise of powers agreement, dated as of May 1, 1999, ( the " agreement"), between the City and the Agency,

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1 Aonroval of Agreement The proposed form of Agreement, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated into this Resolution by reference, is hereby approved The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to attest and deliver the Agreement, in substantially said form with such additions thereto or changes that hereafter become necessary in the interests of the City and which are reviewed and approved by City Attorney, any such additions or changes to the conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Agreement
SECTION 2 Effective Date This Resolution shall talce effect immediately upon adoption
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redlands, California, held on the 20th day ofApril, 1999

CITY OF REDLANDS
Byo-. - 1 ---
M461
ATTEST
CurCl k

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF REDLANDS
I, Lorrie Poyzer, City Cleric of the City of Redlands, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Redlands, California at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of April, 1999, by the following vote AYES Councilmembers Banda, Gilbreath, Freedman, George, Mayor Cunningham NOES None
ABSENT None
ABSTAIN None
City Cler , City o*fs, California
1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\Resolution No. 8756 Dissolving the RFA.bm.02.26.2026.docx RESOLUTION NO. 8756

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

DISSOLVING THE REDLANDS FINANCING AUTHORITY AND TERMINATING THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT DATED MAY 1, 1999
WHEREAS, the City of Redlands (the “City”) and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands (the “Agency”) entered into that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated as of May 1, 1999, creating the Redlands Financing Authority (the “Authority” or “RFA”); and WHEREAS, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement authorizes the Authority to exercise powers common to the City and the Agency and, among other powers, to assist in financing for public purposes and to issue and sell bonds consistent with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement provides that the Authority shall continue to exercise its powers until termination of the Agreement or until the City and the Agency mutually rescind the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement further provides that, upon termination, any assets of the Authority are to be distributed to the respective grantors and assignors thereof; and WHEREAS, the Authority historically served as a financing conduit for City utility revenue bond issuances (water, wastewater, and solid waste), and the last debt maturity associated with those financings occurred in 2017; and
WHEREAS, redevelopment agencies in California were dissolved statewide effective February 1, 2012, and successor agencies were established to wind down enforceable obligations pursuant to state dissolution law; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency’s remaining wind-down activities have concluded as of July 2024; and
WHEREAS, staff has confirmed that the Authority has no outstanding obligations, no open trustee or fiscal agent accounts, no continuing disclosure obligations, and no remaining assets; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that dissolving the Authority and terminating the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement is a prudent fiscal housekeeping action that will align the City’s legal entities with current operational needs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are adopted as findings of the City Council.

Section 2. The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999 creating the Redlands Financing Authority is hereby terminated pursuant to its terms. 2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\Resolution No. 8756 Dissolving the RFA.bm.02.26.2026.docx Section 3. The Redlands Financing Authority is hereby dissolved effective immediately upon adoption of this Resolution.

Section 4. Based on staff’s confirmation that the Authority holds no assets and maintains no open trustee or fiscal agent accounts, no asset distribution or account closure actions are required.

Section 5. The Mayor, City Manager, Finance Director, and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all ministerial actions necessary or desirable to implement this Resolution and reflect the dissolution in the City’s records.

Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 17th day of March, 2026. _______________________
Mario Saucedo, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\Resolution No. 8756 Dissolving the RFA.bm.02.26.2026.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.  I5.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the Termination of License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC for the use of 30 parking spaces on City-owned property located at 1625 W. Redlands Blvd. and Authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the Letter of Termination of a License Agreement (Facilities and Community Services Department Director Crocker )
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

1. I move that the City Council terminate the License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental; and

2. I move that the City Council authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the Letter of Termination of a License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council terminate the License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC (Avis Budget), as the Redlands Police Department Safety Hall (RPDSH) Project (Phase I) is expected to commence on April 20, 2026, and direct staff to have the City Manager or designee sign the Letter of Termination of the License Agreement.

DISCUSSION:

In June 2022, the City Council approved a License Agreement with Avis Budget for the use of 30 parking spaces on city-owned property located at 1625 W. Redlands Blvd., Redlands. Construction will begin with the demolition, abatement, and earthwork on the RPDSH Project (Phase I), which is expected to start on April 20, 2026.

Consequently, the site must be cleared of vehicles for Phase I construction. Staff has prepared a Letter of Termination of the License Agreement with Avis Budget and upon approval, the City Council will authorize the City Manager to provide 30-day notice of termination to Avis Budget.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may deny staff's recommendation and provide alternate direction.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Tricia Munoz, Management Analyst

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 2025-2026
Revenue Generating: Yes
Amount: ($1,500) per month
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Account No: 101300.4813
Additional Appropriation Required: No
Discussion:

Approval of this action will reduce revenue for account 101300.4813 in the amount of $18,000 annually.

Attachments
Avis_Budget_Licence_Agreement_Termination_Letter.pdf
License_Agree-Avis_Budget_Car_Rental_LLC_Fully_Executed.pdf Original_Staff_Report_-_Avis_Budget_License_Agreement.pdf City of

REDLANDS
Facilities & Community Services Department
35 Cajon Street, Suite 222, Redlands, CA 92373
909-335-4738
[email protected]
March 18, 2026
Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC
Attn: Donald Pierce, Area Development Director
1611 W. Vista Way
Vista, CA 92083
Subject: Notice of Termination of License Agreement
This letter serves as formal written notice that the City of Redlands is terminating the Agreement dated June 7, 2022, between Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC and the City of Redlands (the “Agreement”).

In accordance with Section 9 of the Agreement, this letter constitutes a 30-day written notice of termination. The Agreement shall terminate effective April 18, 2026.

You remain responsible for fulfilling all outstanding obligations incurred prior to the effective termination date, including any applicable payments, reporting requirements, or return of agency property, as required under the Agreement. Any rights or obligations that, by their nature, survive termination shall remain in effect.

Please acknowledge receipt of this notice in writing within 5 business days.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact Tricia Munoz, Management Analyst with Facilities and Community Services at (909) 848-6605 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Charles M. Duggan Jr.

City Manager

TABITHA CROCKER
Director

City Council/Successor Agency Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. I.18.

DATE: 06/07/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT:Approve a license agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC. for the use of 30 parking spaces on City-owned property located at 1625 W. Redlands Blvd, and determine that the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Assistant City Manager Boatman)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

1. I move to determine that approval of the agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and

2. I move to approve a license agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC. for the use of 30 parking spaces on City-owned property located at 1625 W.

Redlands Blvd., and determine that the approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.

DISCUSSION:

On December 21, 2021, the City Council approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement with 1625 W Redlands LLC, for the acquisition of the property located at 1625 W. Redlands Blvd. As a result, on March 3, 2022, the City acquired the subject property. Prior to the sale of the property, Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC (Avis) had a license agreement for the use of parking spaces from the previous owner. Avis has requested the use of a portion of the City-owned property for the continued use of approximately 30 parking spaces.

As the City will not immediately occupy the facilities at the property location, the approval of the License Agreement will not impact any design, construction, or other City operations at this time.

Furthermore, it has been determined that approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines pursuant to Section 15301 as the leasing of the existing parking lot will not increase the existing operational capacity or expand the use of the parking facilities, enabling a categorical exemption from CEQA under section 15301 for Existing Facilities.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may elect not to approve the license agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC. and provide alternative direction to staff.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not Applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Larry Alms, Administrative Assistant II
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2022-23
Revenue Generating:Y
Amount: $18,000
Discussion:

Revenue will be $18,000 annually during the term of the License Agreement.

Attachments
A. License Agreement Avis Budget Car Rental
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I6.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve a $50,000 contribution for the 2026 Fourth of July Celebration to the Redlands 4th of July Committee and determine that the financial support serves a public benefit and approve the additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000 (Facilities and Community Services Department Director Crocker ) MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

1. I move that the City Council approve a contribution of $50,000 for the 2026 Fourth of July Celebration to the Redlands 4th of July Committee and determine that the financial support serves a public benefit; and

2. I move that the City Council approve the additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve a contribution of $50,000 for the 2026 Fourth of July Celebration to the Redlands 4th of July Committee and determine that the financial support serves a public benefit. Staff further recommends that City Council approve the additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000.

DISCUSSION:

The Facilities and Community Services Department (FCS) processes applications and issues special event permits for public activities within the city.

Events may proceed upon permit approval, provided all requirements, including all fee payments, are met. The City values partnerships with nonprofit organizations and periodically supports events and initiatives that provide significant public benefits through financial or in-kind contributions.

The Redlands 4th of July Committee, Inc., is a registered non-profit organization operating out of the City of Redlands. It has held its Fourth of July celebration in the City annually since 1968. According to the Redlands 4th of July Committee, all funds generated are utilized to pay for the expenses associated with facilitating the Fourth of July fireworks show, park, and parade activities within the City. This year's celebration will incorporate the recognition of the 250th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and include enhanced activities and celebration amenities. The event also provides an economic benefit by drawing visitors to the City who spend money on various food and services.

For the 2026 Fourth of July celebration, the Redlands 4th of July Committee is requesting a $50,000 financial contribution to secure the fireworks display. This contribution will represent a portion of the total event cost, with the fireworks display expenses expected to exceed $121,000, this year. The Committee requires this funding to finalize their agreement with the fireworks' vendor. In addition, the Committee has requested logistical support from the FCS, Police, and Fire Departments. A separate report will address these in-kind contributions on a future agenda.

If approved, the $50,000 contribution will be disbursed after the event is successfully completed. The Committee has requested the City’s commitment of funds prior to finalizing the annual contract with the fireworks' provider to ensure sufficient funds are available to meet the contract terms.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may elect to deny the request for the expenditure of funds, or choose an alternative amount.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Priority A - Quality of Life; Strategic Objective 1. Beautification, Arts and Culture SUBMITTED BY:

Tabitha Crocker, Facilities & Community Services Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Tricia Swope, Manager, FCS

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: FY 2025-26
Revenue Generating: Yes
Amount: $50,000
Budgeted Y/N: N
Account No.: 101300.6708
Additional Appropriation Required: Yes
Discussion:

An additional appropriation of $50,000 from the General Fund unassigned balance is necessary to fund this request. The General Fund unassigned fund
balance, as listed in the FY 2025-26 Biennial Adopted Budget, is projected to be approximately $27 million as of June 30, 2026.

Attachments
A_Additional_Appropriation_Form.pdf
B_4th_of_July_2026_support_request.pdf

Redlands Fourth of July Committee, Inc
278 Tennessee Street
PO Box 12
Redlands, California
January 30, 2026
City of Redlands Redlands Fourth of July Committee
Chris Boatman 2026 Celebration & Fireworks Show
Assistant City Manager
35 Cajon Street
Redlands, California 92373
Dear Mr. Boatman
I’m writing to you today with formal request for continued support from the City of Redlands for our 2026 Annual Fourth of July Celebration.

The Fourth of July Committee consists of group of community volunteers that provide the organization and planning of our community’s annual celebration at Sylvan Park with Vendors, Bands, Live Music, Street Parade with Air and Skydiving show, Flag Ceremony, Rock Bands, culminating with 9pm Fireworks show at Moore Middle School.

On behalf of the Redlands Fourth of July Committee, we formally ask the City of Redlands for their continued support and approval of this community event by providing in-kind Police and Fire personnel as determined needed with monitory support not to exceed 50,000.

Recognizing this year America is recognizing our 250th celebration, we will include longer Fireworks show, enhanced music at Sylvan Park and exclusive Rock Band at Moore MS, including colorful street light pole banners installed downtown Redlands as determined by street department.

We request 30,000. be funded by April to aid with upfront event costs and deposits, with additional not to exceed budget of 20,000. for longer Fireworks show, enhanced music at Sylvan Park, exclusive Rock Band at Moore MS, including colorful street light pole banners installed downtown to be coordinated by City staff.

Our committee is here to serve the event and understand that without the City of Redlands support this event would not be possible.

Thank you,
Tim Murone
Redlands Fourth of July Committee, Inc
Redlands Fourth of July Celebration

BACKGROUND
Redlands Fourth of July Committee, Inc. was started by group of Redlands businesspersons who wanted to bring something special to the community providing its first show inside Sylvan Park in 1966. It was free to the community and simple to produce during these times.

The committee’s function is to provide the catalyst needed to plan and provide the City of Redlands 4 th of July
days long celebration with evening Fireworks celebration for the surrounding communities to enjoy.

As the crowds became bigger along with the fireworks show the University of Redlands offered the stadium as way to support the community. The show was presented at the east end of the track directly in front of the audience. Over the years the crowds and fireworks display became larger eventually moving the show to the university’s upper baseball fields for safety purposes.

The continued growth of the show eventually brought increased visitors from surrounding communities parking along the city streets, picnicking on the grass around the university campus creating increase in liability insurance, property safety, need for additional portable restrooms, fencing and trash cleanup. In 2019 this additional cost to the event surpassed 31,000.

With the installation of the Universities scoreboard before the 2020 Fireworks Show we realized how much it would block the fireworks ground show in the upper baseball field. The committee was able to secure relationship with Redlands Unified School District and made the move to Moore MS. Our facility use fee and cleanup costs have been under 2600. creating total savings of over 28,000.

Since inception the city has participated in some way, providing Police and Fire personnel as needed for community safety, which has grown to include traffic control, at Sylvan Park and Moore MS Air and Fireworks Show.

Currently, this community event is funded thru the sale of Fireworks Tickets, Business donations, monetary support from San Manuel and the City of Redlands and over 30 volunteers working on the 4th of July.

In 2024 San Manuel cut their sponsorship from 30k to 10k, last year advising they will no longer be supporting local events do to change in their business philosophy leaving a 30k hole in our budget. Monetary support is critical to the success of the event for our community.

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO.  J1.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action relating to the designation of Voting Delegates to represent the City at the 2026 Regional Conference of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and General Assembly (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

1. I move to designate ____________________ to serve as the voting delegate at the 2026 Regional Conference of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).

2. I move to designate _____________________ to serve as the alternate voting delegate at the 2026 Regional Conference of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).

DISCUSSION:

The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is holding its Regional Conference and General Assembly on May 7-8, 2026, at the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa in Palm Desert, California. In order to participate in the SCAG General Assembly meeting, a delegate must be officially designated by the City. An alternate may also be designated in the event the designated delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. This item is on the agenda to allow the City Council an opportunity to officially designate a delegate and alternate to participate in the SCAG General Assembly meeting. Additional information regarding the conference is attached for the Council’s consideration.

SUBMITTED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
PREPARED BY:

Whitney Mesna, Management Analyst

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 2026
Discussion:

Costs associated with attending the conference is included in the FY26 operating budget.

Attachments
2026_Regional_Conference.pdf

 












! 
"

#

$

% &
'
 
'
()(*#$++, #
%-.
 







!"#$%&$'%

(")*+,'%
-$&% $.$&)/&01,
)/1& '21&'1,'*/2'
'21&'1,'







    





  
City
Council AGENDA ITEM NO.  J2.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT:

Annual Report of the Cultural Arts Commission given by Chairman Daniel Gohman (Facilities and Community Services Department Director Crocker )
DISCUSSION:

For this evening's City Council Meeting, Chairman Daniel Gohman, will be presenting the Cultural Arts Commission Annual Report.

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. J3.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Receive and file the Annual Report from the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025 (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia ) MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to receive and file the annual report from the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that Council receive and file the annual report from the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025.

DISCUSSION:

For this evening's City Council meeting, Chair Ruth Cook will be presenting the annual report of the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025.

SUBMITTED BY:

Danielle Garcia, Management Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager

FISCAL IMPACT
Discussion: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended motion.

Attachments
Measure_T_FY_2024-2025_Annual_Report_3172026.pdf

P a g e 1 | 16
Measure T Citizens’ Oversight Committee
FY 2025 Annual Report
March 17, 2026
Summary & Background
The Measure T Citizens’ Oversight Committee provides stewardship of Measure T sales tax revenue. This Annual Measure T Report covers Fiscal Year (FY) 2025, beginning July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.

Measure T is a one-cent sales tax, approved by the voters of the City of Redlands, that became effective April 1, 2021. The stated purpose of the tax was to provide funding for safety services, fire protection, paramedics, 911 emergency response, addressing homelessness, police patrols and crime prevention, maintaining library services, parks, sidewalks, and roads, keeping public areas well-maintained and other general services. The measure included a provision for the formation of a Citizens’ Oversight Committee, further described in Chapter 2.72 in the Redlands Municipal Code.

The Oversight Committee was established to serve as an advisory body to the City Council and to periodically review the revenues and expenditures of Measure T monies. The seven-member committee is comprised of five (5) citizen members from each Council district and two (2) members representing the City’s employee bargaining units. The committee shall advise the Council regarding the use of Measure T revenue, according to the priorities set forth in each fiscal year adopted budget. This includes an annual written report to the Council that summarizes the committee’s proceedings and activities during the most recent review period.

For FY 2025, the City Council made the decision to prioritize the following expenditures in the Adopted Budget.
 Continue funding for public safety staffing, public works staffing and staffing for other critical services
 Restoring vehicle and equipment leases, IT support and contract services for Fire & Police  Addressing deferred maintenance for various buildings & facilities  Capital leases for vehicles and equipment for public safety, public works and Recreation & Senior Services
 Support for additional programs for Recreation & Senior Services

 Restoring contract services for the maintenance of parks, streets, and City facilities  The remodel of Fire Station No. 262
 Upgrade and Enhance the Redlands Bowl and Recreation/ Senior Center facilities  Upgrade and Replace various park facilities
 Specialized Police Department equipment
 Fire Department Vehicles and Apparatus
 Sidewalk/ADA Ramp Replacement Projects
 Tree Trimming 25% of City Trees
 Funding the annual contribution for Project Homekey Homelessness Solutions grant During FY 2025, the City received a total of $20,337,840 in Measure T sales tax. This was roughly $194,840 higher than the budget estimate provided in the Adopted Budget ($20,142,000). Sales tax is one of the City’s most economically sensitive revenue sources and also one of its largest. The City typically takes a conservative approach to budgeting revenue, so this overperformance of a little less than 1% indicates a stable local economy. In FY 2024, sales tax exceeded budgeted figures by roughly 1%. Moving forward, future budgets are more likely to reflect conservative estimates for sales tax revenues as the City remains braced for economic uncertainty.

Committee Proceedings
The Measure T Citizens’ Oversight Committee met on June 2, 2025 to receive a presentation on the City Manager’s Proposed Budget for Measure T for fiscal years 2024–2025 and 2025–2026, including a review of committee accomplishments, current-year spending highlights, and detailed plans for the next two years. Staff provided updates on homelessness initiatives, most notably the opening and full occupancy of Project Homekey and a reported reduction in the homeless count, as well as a summary of major budget drivers such as inflation, conservative revenue assumptions, and other factors influencing the City’s overall fiscal outlook. The committee also received an overview of Council budget priorities and discussed how proposed expenditures align with Measure T spending parameters. The parameters include:
 Public safety staffing
 infrastructure and ADA improvements
 park and recreation enhancements
 investments supporting the Safety Hall project.

Committee members asked questions regarding franchise fees, downtown gateway improvements, Project Homekey, and the use of Measure T funds for expanded fire staffing and EMS-related costs. discussion focused on maintaining fidelity to voter intent while acknowledging the service-level benefits of staffing investments. The committee ultimately voted to recommend City Council adopt the proposed budget without amendment, while noting ongoing concern that rising staffing costs could constrain one-time capital needs. The Committee agreed to reconvene in February 2026 to review audit results and consider adopting a Measure T logo.

The Committee met again on February 20, 2026, and welcomed two new members: Eli Salazar, representing the Non-Public Safety bargaining units, and Fire Captain Matthew Swenson, representing the Public Safety bargaining units.

Following the introduction of new members, staff provided a review of the Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Report on Measure T Revenues and Expenditures. Staff explained that the report compares budgeted and actual expenditures to demonstrate that Measure T funds are being used in a manner consistent with voter-approved purposes. The Committee discussed timing of report distribution, with staff committing to provide future materials earlier to allow additional review time.

Committee members asked clarifying questions regarding unspent budgeted funds (noting that some expenditures will occur in subsequent fiscal years), the restoration of firefighter paramedic staffing levels, tree-related infrastructure impacts, public safety IT investments, Redlands Bowl improvements, and safeguards in place for social service and homelessness-related expenditures. Staff provided explanations regarding accounting reclassifications, infrastructure limitations under existing contracts, and internal controls designed to prevent fraud and ensure accountability.

The Committee also reviewed the draft FY 2025 Annual Report on Measure T Spending. Staff noted that Measure T revenues represent approximately 16% of General Fund revenues and highlighted the importance of communicating the community benefits funded by the measure. Members discussed strategies to enhance public awareness and agreed to submit proposed edits to staff prior to the next meeting. The Committee unanimously approved a proposed Measure T logo and scheduled a follow-up meeting for March 4 to consider final edits to the Annual Report.

The Committee met again on March 4, 2026. The primary agenda item was discussion and possible action to adopt the Fiscal Year 2025 Annual Report on Measure T Spending, including consideration of edits submitted by Dr. Teele since the February meeting and discussion of the proposed presentation of the Annual Report to the City Council.

The Committee agreed to incorporate Dr. Teele’s edits and also requested, upon recommendation from Mr.

Swenson, that future reports further differentiate staffing categories funded by Measure T, including separating Police and Fire personnel costs and distinguishing sworn from non-sworn staffing. With those updates and recommendations noted, the Committee approved the FY 2025 Annual Report on Measure T for presentation to the City Council at its March 17, 2026 meeting. The Committee also received an update on schedule for the upcoming FY 2027 and FY 2028 biennial budget and discussed a tentative meeting date in late May 2026 (around May 20–21) to review the proposed biennial budget as it relates to Measure T.

Financial Summary Information
The total General Fund Revenue for fiscal year (FY) 2025 was approximately $128.2 million. Measure T sales tax revenue represents 16% of these funds, or $20.3 million. These revenues were collected between July 1, 2024 and June 30, 2025. See Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Below are a few key takeaways related to the collection of Measure T:
 Year-over-year, Measure T sales tax revenue is roughly $143,535 (1%) more than FY 2024  Taken together, both Basic Sales tax and Measure T sales tax comprise 37% of General Fund revenue, with Property Tax as the next largest category at 35%
 Overall, Measure T revenues have been slightly higher than original budget estimates projected. That trend may reverse as we enter more economically uncertain times.

Figure 2 below describes the spending categories, the original amount budgeted for each, and actual spending before June 30, 2025. The original budgeted amount as well as the actual amount for Measure T Sales Tax revenue is also included at the bottom of the figure. Since actual Measure T revenues slightly exceeded budget, certain projects were incorporated into the Measure T spending plan as long as they were appropriate in nature given the original Measure T budget goals. The Committee notes that because, Measure T revenue is a general sales tax comingled with other General Fund revenue and pooled for General Fund expenditures, it is not possible to trace all specific expenditures back to Measure T revenue. [continued on next page]

Figure 2.

Spending Categories from the FY 2025 Adopted Budget
Public Safety
Public Safety Staffing (Police and Fire) $ 4,881,388 5,359,532 $ (478,144) $ IT infrastructure and services for PD 360,000 200,000 160,000 Enhanced custody transport services 135,000 135,000 - Police Vehicles & Outfitting 1,121,917 1,216,244 (94,327) Fire Light Duty Vehicle Leases 314,851 314,851 - Increase in Paramedics cost 220,000 220,000 - Police Department specialized IT software & hardware, tools 1,170,031 116,690 1,053,341 Specialized Law Enforcement equipment 216,500 87,500 129,000 Fire Department Vehicles, Engines and Apparatus - 306,285 (306,285) Fire Station 262 Building Standards Remodel 476,330 2,160,000 (1,683,670) Fire Station Apparatus Bay Storage - 600,000 (600,000) Fire Station Bay Door Replacements - 500,000 (500,000) Future Public Safety Facility Reserve Set-Aside 4,200,000 - 4,200,000 - subtotal 11,216,102 13,096,017 1,879,915 Public Infrastructure Tree trimming for 25% of City trees 855,701 1,000,000 144,299 Alley Improvement / Repaving Project 226,776 - (226,776) Sidewalk, ADA Ramp & Curb construction 487,265 500,000 12,735 Traffic Signal Cabinets & Components 124,967 325,000 200,033 Downtown & Gateway Improvements - 90,000 90,000 Replace aged and outdated maintenance equipment 203,627 295,000 91,373 Upgrade & Enhance Redlands Bowl and Community & Senior Center Facilities 189,125 710,193 521,068 Restored service contracts (enhanced maintenance) 1,560,874 864,795 (696,079) Address Building & Facilities deferred maintenance 383,144 100,000 (283,144) Capital /vehicle leases - Replacement of 11 trucks, passenger vehicles 292,526 353,105 60,579 subtotal 4,238,093 4,324,005 85,912 Quality of Life
Library/FCS/Recreation/IT staffing 1,589,206 1,795,279 (206,073) Recreational & Senior Center Programs 110,697 100,000 10,697 Replace & Upgrade various park facilities (Master Plan, lighting, playgrounds) 546,362 1,792,891 (1,246,529) Project Homekey grant match and homeless services 687,852 1,000,000 (312,148) subtotal 4,688,170 $ 2,934,117 $ (1,754,053) $

BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
FY 2025 EXPENDITURES TOTAL 20,142,365 20,354,139 211,774 FY 2025 REVENUES TOTAL 20,142,000 20,337,840 195,840 Actual Revenues Minus (-) Actual Expenditures (16,299)
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2025
Difference

You will note there are several differences between the Adopted Budget and the Actual Amounts for FY 2025.

Variances are expected in an annual spending plan, particularly for a capital- and equipment-heavy plan, because final costs and timing depend on staffing, procurement and delivery schedules, and project timelines.

There are several reasons for variances between fiscal years and between planned versus actual expenses.  Staffing – Staffing levels and compensation can change from year to year due to vacancies, recruitment timelines, turnover, and negotiated salary/benefit adjustments. In addition, some costs may shift between fiscal years based on when positions are filled.  Delivery date – The City’s accounting practices specify that if a good is delivered before June 30th of a fiscal year’s end, its expense must be recorded in that same fiscal year. For example, Fire vehicles (a planned expense of $306,825 altogether) have not yet been received, although the budget authorization for them occurred in FY 2025. The expense will be recorded in the Fiscal Year in which the equipment is eventually received.
 Construction activities: Large projects rarely align perfectly with a single fiscal year budget cycle. Even when a project is budgeted in one fiscal year, the pace of spending depends on design completion, permitting, bidding, contract execution, material availability, and construction sequencing. When those steps extend beyond the original schedule, expenditures may occur later than planned, resulting in apparent variances that reflect timing differences.
o Examples include the Fire Station 262 Building Standards Remodel and the Redlands Bowl electrical upgrades, where a larger share of costs were incurred earlier than anticipated, as well as certain park improvement projects where spending is occurring later than planned because design development, environmental/permitting (as applicable), and procurement/bidding must be completed before construction can begin. These timing differences can create variances in a given fiscal year even when the underlying projects and authorized purposes remain unchanged.  Changing Priorities: From time to time, needs emerge after the budget is adopted, particularly for public safety and asset lifecycle replacements, and this requires adjusting the timing or sequencing of planned purchases. For example, in-car police radio replacements were not specifically anticipated at the time of budget adoption, so the related costs were accommodated through a reprioritization of planned spending. This shift is reflected in the Police Department specialized software, hardware and tools category along with additional funding that was needed to cover costs of enhancing the public safety camera system.

Looking over Figure 2 provided on the preceding page (page 5), the Public Safety spending category received a total of approximately $13.1 million in Measure T funds, up from $10.3 million in the prior year (2024). The Police Department received ongoing funding for roughly 37 positions within the department, including 12 sworn positions (officers or higher). Many of these positions were added to restore COVID-related reductions. In addition to this, 44 vehicle leases were funded, with 21 of these dedicated to replacing aging patrol vehicles. Also, the outfitting and gear needed to commission these new vehicles was also funded through Measure T. The Police Department also received funding for ongoing lease payments of the new Taser 10 system, which expands the Department’s response capabilities and represents a significant investment in modernizing critical public safety equipment. Funds were also used to purchase critically necessary hardware replacements, including 77 in-unit radios and 12 new in-unit computers. Partial funding was provided toward replacement of 80 cameras and the rebuilding of the public safety camera network, representing a significant investment in modernizing and maintaining core public safety communications and technology infrastructure. Funds were also used to purchase

a subscription to Crossroads software for the Police Department, supporting enhanced data analysis and information-sharing capabilities to inform investigations and decision making.

New In-Unit Police Radios
For the Fire Department, a major Measure T-funded project was the renovation of Fire Station 262 to maintain compliance with applicable building standards for fire station facilities and modernize the station’s operational and living spaces. Construction began in April 2024, and the City of Redlands and Redlands Fire Department celebrated the station’s grand re-opening on August 6, 2025. The upgrades included completion of remodeled restrooms and dormitory areas designed to provide functional facilities for all personnel.

In FY 2025, Measure T also supported station and equipment upkeep, including a backup power generator at Station 262, replacement compressor equipment at Station 263 supporting self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) bottles, and ongoing payments for the Department’s light-duty fleet.

To cover higher-than-anticipated costs for the Station 262 remodel and these station-support improvements, approximately $600,000 originally programmed for apparatus bay structure storage was repurposed during the year (generator, apparatus bay interior painting, and compressor equipment). Remaining funds were carried forward into FY 2026 to support Station 263 infrastructure work, including generator replacement and fuel island re-establishment. These adjustments explain the year-end variance in this spending category between budget and actual costs.

In FY 2025, the City also set aside $4.2 million of Measure T proceeds in the Future Facilities Reserve to strengthen the funding plan for future facility needs and reduce the amount that must be financed. These funds are being held as a dedicated match for upcoming public safety facility projects as they reach final scope, schedule, and financing milestones.

Rendering of Final Design for Station 262
Final Completed Construction

Highlights from Fire Station No. 262 Remodel

In terms of public infrastructure, there are several areas in which Measure T has been invested:
o Tree trimming
o ADA ramp and sidewalk replacement
o Facility improvements
o Increased replacement of traffic cabinets and controllers o Replacement of aged and outdated equipment
o Sidewalk replacement
o Enhanced levels of service for various public amenities.  5,299 trees were trimmed, including park and street trees. This is about five times more than the “preMeasure T” annual average trimming level. Also, 223 dead trees were removed. Lastly, a total of 222 new trees were planted.
 Contract services for facilities and ground maintenance and repairs were higher than originally budgeted due to a variety of factors, including: expanded use of contract code enforcement; enhanced service levels for parks maintenance, landscaping, fence repair, street lights, sports field striping; nightly park lockups; storm drain improvements; air conditioning replacements at various facilities; and other projects related to deferred maintenance.
 New equipment was purchased for the Parks and Streets divisions. The equipment includes a new 3500psi 12-volt pressure washer skid and two (2) variable street message boards for warning & advising drivers of critical information or road conditions.
 The A.K. Smiley Public Library received eight (8) new computer & monitor replacements for public use and new furniture was purchased for the Contemporary Club, including 350 new vinyl-backed chairs and 12 new 8-foot folding tables. The kitchen underwent a much-needed renovation of 20-year old cabinetry, flooring and countertops.
 Eight (8) new traffic cabinets that house the equipment that controls traffic signals were purchased and installed to replace old and outdated equipment

 Five (5) traffic signal video detection units (to detect vehicles) were purchased and installed at the following intersections to replace old, outdated systems:
o Orange Street and Pioneer Avenue
o Orange Street and Haul Road
o Eureka Street and West Stuart Avenue
o West Colton Avenue and Industrial Park Avenue
o Alabama Street and Barton Road
 Guardrails in four (4) locations that were either irreparably damaged or out of compliance were replaced at the following locations:
o Industrial Park Drive & Alabama Street
o Kansas Street & Park Street
o Grove Street & Sylvan Boulevard
o Tennessee & the I-10 Freeway
 One and a half (1.5) miles of lifted and broken sidewalks and 14 ADA ramps were removed and replaced throughout the City.
 Four (4) public alleys were resurfaced, and new drainage facilities were installed. The Project also replaced driveways and sidewalks where necessary.

Concrete forms placed at Cambon Court

Newly installed ADA Ramp at Cambon Court

Setting Concrete Forms for the placement of the v-gutter in Alley from Division Street to Chapel Street.

Grinding the existing pavement on Alley from Church Street to Division Street & Chapel Street
Paving work from Division Street to Chapel Street
Lastly, Measure T enabled investment into enhancing and restoring certain “quality of life” amenities and services for the community. In FY 2025, these investments were made in the following areas: homelessness response efforts, park infrastructure improvements, and expanded recreation and senior services programs and activities.

Homelessness Solutions Highlights – The Division advanced several key objectives, including securing over $9.8 million in new grant funding, expanding housing and outreach capacity, and supporting a reported 65% reduction in Redlands’ homeless population since 2023. Key accomplishments:
o Operation of Step Up in Redlands (the Good Nite Inn facility) with 98 permanent supportive housing units continues to be fully operational following the exit of the original developer o The division hosted a Regional Homelessness Forum, “Bridging the Gaps,” with over 120 attendees from various government and nonprofit agencies participating o Outreach teams connected over 170 individuals with services and support resources o Several dozen encampment cleanups were conducted Citywide Homeless Encampment Clean Ups
Volunteers Performing Outreach during the Annual Point-In-Time Count  Park Infrastructure Improvements –
o Added sports field lighting to 2 sports fields (softball & baseball) at Martinez Park to allow for evening use
o Redlands Bowl improvements, including -
 Installation of a new HVAC min-split system for 3 office spaces  Removal & replacement of stage area concrete (3,100 square feet)  The completion of final electrical improvements related to upgrades to the main electrical feed, breaker room, underground conduit and wiring, replacement of existing audio/ video towers, and the addition of new audio and video towers.

o Installation of a Dedication Garden at Fire Station No. 262 complete with drought-tolerant landscaping, bench, a water feature and uplighting for the station’s flagpole o Work on the Parks Master Plan continues in FY 2025. The Plan is intended to provide the City with a 7–10 year roadmap for park renovations, improvements, expansion, and new development across the City’s approximately 253.4 acres of parkland and 18 established parks. FY 2025 activities include ongoing community engagement, asset analysis, needs assessment, priority development, and coordination with the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) planning process. o Plans and construction documents were developed for the sweeping capital improvement projects planned for Texonia Park, including design of new restrooms, shade structures, lighting fixtures, and various paved areas.
o Flag poles were installed at six City Parks (Sylvan, Crafton, Martinez, Laramie, Brookside and Israel Beal).

New Sports Field Lighting at Martinez Park
 Recreational and downtown programs –
o “Movies in the Park” continues to include 2 locations and Senior Matinee movie showing at the Joslyn Senior Center
o Senior bus transportation vouchers continued
o Enhancements for the annual Tree Lighting Holiday Event in Downtown Redlands o Other special holiday events enhanced: Halloween on State, Juneteenth Celebrations, Mother’s Day Tea and Fashion Show, ‘Senior’ Prom Dances, and many others.

Conclusions
The Measure T Citizens’ Oversight Committee has reviewed the revenues and expenditures of the Measure T sales tax and confirmed that funds were collected and spent in line with the City’s budget plan and the original intent of Measure T. The City’s FY 2025 General Fund Adopted Budget supported core services, including public safety.

Measure T remains essential for funding city services and infrastructure projects. The City is also working to grow and diversify its tax base through economic development to improve long-term financial stability. Local revenue from Measure T, combined with economic growth, helps maintain the services and infrastructure that Redlands residents rely on.

The Committee recognizes that Measure T reflects commitment from Redlands residents and believes the funds are being used as intended. Throughout the review period, City staff have provided transparent and accurate information. We appreciate taxpayers’ support in ensuring a stable source of local funding for essential services and improvements.

The Committee looks forward to continued progress in public safety, infrastructure, and overall quality of life through Measure T funding in future budget cycles.

Sincerely,

Ruth Cook, Chair, District 1
Melisa Castro, District 2
Ed Millican, Secretary, District 3
Suzanne Teele, District 4
Scott Welsh, Vicechair, District 5
Eli Salazar, Non-Public Safety Bargaining Unit
Matthew Swenson, Public Safety Bargaining Unit
MEASURE T CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. J4.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Receive and file FY 2026 Mid-Year General Fund Review (Management Services/Finance Director Garcia )
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to receive and file this report.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this report.

DISCUSSION:

The Mid-Year Budget Review is a scheduled check-in on the City’s Adopted FY 2026 Budget. While it is referred to as “mid-year,” this review is based on approximately seven months of financial activity because many revenues are received after the period in which they are earned, and certain costs take time to be invoiced, processed, and recorded. Using the most complete data available at this point in the fiscal year, staff compares year-to-date revenues and expenditures to the adopted budget (as adjusted for carryover, encumbrances, and prior Councilapproved appropriation changes); updates projections for the remainder of the year; and summarizes notable variances and developing trends. The report also provides context by looking back at the prior fiscal year’s audited results and how activity was trending at a comparable point in time. The purpose of this review is to keep the City Council and the public informed on current-year budget performance and to identify whether any limited, targeted adjustments are needed to maintain service levels, address operational needs, and support Council priorities for the remainder of FY 2026.

In addition to monitoring the General Fund, this report considers broader economic conditions and other key factors that may affect financial outcomes as well as opportunities for strengthening long-term fiscal sustainability. While we are entering a new biennial budget planning cycle and concurrent labor negotiations with the City’s nine employee bargaining units, staff currently does not anticipate substantive revenue variances or the need for significant additional appropriations in FY 2026. The next formal budget deliberations are scheduled for May and June 2026, when the City Manager will present the proposed Biennial Budget for Fiscal Years 2027 and 2028 for City Council consideration.

Fiscal Year 2025 Results
This section reviews the audited results for Fiscal Year 2025 and compares them to the adjusted FY 2025 Budget approved by Council at the June 2025 Mid-Biennium Budget Review and any Council-approved changes since. (The Mid-Biennium Review is the City’s structured midpoint review within the two-year budget cycle, whereas the Mid-Year review checks in on each individual fiscal year).

When comparing the audited results of Fiscal Year 2025 to the 2025 Mid-Biennium Budget Update (also referred to as the 12-Month Estimate for FY 2025), total revenue in the General Fund performed roughly as expected, with a positive variance of $2,168,961 (1.5%).

Table 1
The positive variance in revenue category Taxes of $2.07 million is primarily due to higher-than-anticipated revenues from property tax and Measure T sales tax. Property tax continued to outperform expectations due to sustained growth in assessed valuation, reflecting prior-year increases in median home prices and continued property turnover activity. In addition, new development and infill construction added higher assessed value to the tax roll than was originally estimated. While the broader real estate market began to moderate during FY 2025, property tax trends typically lag current real estate conditions because of the duration and nature of the assessment cycle, a function of the County Assessor’s office.

In the General Government category, revenues performed $2.02 million over forecasts. This was mainly due to continued strong investment income earnings and higher revenue from business license renewals and registrations. These indicators suggest a strong earnings environment for the City’s fixed-income investments as well as a local business environment with room to grow. Another source of the increase in business license tax revenue can also be attributed to the Business License Amnesty Program approved by Council in April 2025.

In the Charges for Service category, revenues exceeded budget forecasts by $3.83 million. This significant difference is primarily attributable to the implementation of GASB Statement No. 87, which requires the City to record the proceeds of new vehicle leases as revenue, with a corresponding expense recognized in the same period. This accounting change increased reported departmental revenue in this category by approximately $2.2 million. The remaining variance is associated with higher reimbursements for Fire mutual aid responses and increased permitting and plan check activity across Development Services, Municipal Utilities and Engineering, and Fire.

Revenue from Transfers In remained close to projections. The variance in Use of Reserves is typical, as most project-specific uses of reserves are not fully completed within one fiscal year. If a reserve-funded project is carried forward in FY 2026, then the use of its corresponding reserve will be as well.

As shown in Table 2 below, FY 2025 expenditures varied across several categories compared to the Mid-Biennium spending plan. When comparing the audited results of Fiscal Year 2025 to the 2025 Mid-Biennium Budget Update (also referred to as the 12-Month Estimate for FY 2025), total expenditures in the General Fund performed with a variance of $12,347,460 in savings (7.8%). Variances of this nature are common and generally reflect timing of project delivery, staffing and procurement cycles, scope or schedule changes, and mid-year re-prioritization in response to operational needs.

Across all expenditure categories, FY 2025 reflects net savings of approximately $12.35 million compared to the Mid-Biennium Budget Update. This variance is the result of several offsetting factors. Departmental expenditures were approximately $15.88 million below budget as of June 30, 2025, primarily due to unspent capital and operating project budgets, as well as staffing vacancies that persisted throughout the fiscal year.

Offsetting this significant savings is a large variance in the “New/Increases to Reserves” category. In this category, we set aside (i.e., ‘reserve’) portions of the General Fund towards future projects and known financial requirements mostly in the form of those aforementioned unspent project budgets. As is the case for FY 2025, a total of nearly $9.8 million was reserved for encumbrances and carryovers associated with projects that were not fully completed by June 30, 2025 but will continue into FY 2026. This amount was unknown at the time of the mid-biennium adjustments. Additional variances in reserve activity reflect donation revenues that, consistent with donor restrictions, must be placed in a designated reserve and were not anticipated at the time of the mid-biennium revisions to the budget.

The actual amount of Transfers to Other Funds was lower than originally planned. Significant variances in Transfers Out typically correspond with variances in “Use of Reserves” revenues, in the Revenue categories. In any given fiscal year, there may be a selection of projects outside the General Fund, paid for by using releases from the General Fund Reserves. This is the case here. Several projects in other funds that planned a drawdown from General Fund reserves were either not initiated or were only partially complete by the end of FY 2025, thus a significant savings is realized in the corresponding transfers out (as well as in the above Revenue category of “Use of Reserves” noted above).

These variances are summarized below:

Table 2
The two tables above summarize the General Fund’s FY 2025 revenues and expenditures. Together, they determine the net operating result for the year and the resulting change in General Fund unassigned fund balance as of June 30, 2025. Table 3 summarizes these impacts.

Table 3
Fiscal Year 2026 Review
As adopted by the City Council on June 4, 2024, the FY 2026 General Fund budget included the planned use of approximately $9.43 million in unassigned fund balance to support service-level enhancements through additional capital projects and higher operating costs. The use of unassigned fund balance was recommended in order to invest this growing dollar amount into services that would benefit the community.

The FY 2026 budget was subsequently modified at the Mid-Biennium Review on June 17, 2025. The revised plan increased the anticipated use of unassigned fund balance to approximately $11.09 million, an increase of about $1.66 million. This change is primarily attributable to (1) a $1.24 million reduction in projected General Fund revenues based on updated sales tax forecasts, and (2) an approximately $420,000 increase to the A.K. Smiley Public Library budget to support the costs of opening the Museum of Redlands.

Between the originally adopted budget and the current adjusted budget presented in Attachment A, departmental appropriations increased by approximately 10%, rising from $117,447,389 to $129,200,184. This increase reflects several adjustments made since adoption of the budget, including the incorporation of approximately $9.8 million in FY 2025 carryovers and encumbrances, mid-biennium revisions (most notably additional funding to support the opening of the Museum of Redlands), and additional appropriations approved by the City Council since July 1, 2025. These later actions include funding for the Police Department’s body-worn camera program, installation of a modular canine kennel at the Animal Shelter, and other Council-approved uses of reserves for special projects.

Additional adjustments may occur over the coming months as the City Manager and staff develop the FY 2027 & FY 2028 Biennial Budget for City Council consideration and adoption. As part of that process, limited revisions to the FY 2026 budget may also be brought forward, as needed. No significant changes are anticipated at this time.

Taking a look at the seven-month actuals presented in the attachment to this report, we will review General Fund revenues as of January 31, 2026.

Property tax, one of the largest revenue categories, is at $24,621,606, or 54.8% of budget, compared to 57.5% of budget last year. The 3-year historical average for property tax revenue in prior years at January 31 is 55%, suggesting, along with other analyses, that the City is on track to realize revenue forecasts for property taxes.

Property tax revenue is primarily driven by assessed valuation of residential and commercial real property.

Because assessments are established as of the lien date and adjusted through enrollment cycles (including supplemental assessments following ownership changes and new construction), property tax receipts often reflect market conditions from prior years and are generally less sensitive to short-term economic shifts than more elastic revenues such as sales tax. As a result, property tax is typically considered a lagging indicator of economic conditions.

Property tax revenue reflects continued growth in the City’s assessed value, driven in part by new residential and non-residential development and prior-year ownership transfers that reset assessed values closer to market. In addition, the City’s property tax results have been influenced by year-to-year variability in assessed value and tax receipts related to the Mountain View Generating Station, which can fluctuate between fiscal years.

Basic sales tax and Measure T sales tax are currently at 40.3% and 46.4% of projections, compared to 43.6% and

40.2% at this time last year. While this may suggest a softening in consumer spending for basic sales tax, it is important to note that sales tax receipts are inherently lagging and can be materially affected by timing and allocation factors, such as delayed remittances from major retailers, quarter-end reporting patterns, and CDTFA allocation adjustments that may occur in different periods year to year. For that reason, year-to-date performance is best evaluated against historical seasonal patterns.

The three-year historical average at January 31 is 40.9% for basic sales tax and 40.1% for Measure T, which suggests that, based on seasonality, the City remains generally on track to achieve its basic sales tax forecast.

Measure T’s higher-than-average year-to-date performance appears to be driven primarily by stronger taxable sales activity in general consumer goods categories at several high-volume regional retail locations. These retailers generate a significant share of the City’s local transactions and use tax receipts, and stronger than expected activity in this segment has elevated Measure T collections relative to the mid-year average.

Transient occupancy (hotel) tax is at 46.8% realized, compared with 52% in the prior fiscal year. This revenue category also experiences a delay in collection. It is likely that this revenue category will meet revenue projections for FY 2026.

Franchise fees are received quarterly from Frontier and Time Warner and annually from Southern California Edison and the Gas Company, with the latter contributing the most in this category. In FY 2025, the Gas Company franchise fee was $1,314,441, a significant decrease from the prior year amount of $3.1 million. Due to this volatility, revenue for this category is budgeted based on the rolling five-year average.

Annual payments from gas and electrical franchises are expected in April 2026. As of January 31, 2026, only 3.8% of the budgeted revenue had been realized, consistent with historical trends, as these major payments are not received until April. The three-year average realization rate for this revenue at the same point in the fiscal year is

4.6%.

Business license revenue at mid-year is $796,026, or 12.7% of budget, compared to $1.06 million (17.6% of actual) at this time last year. This lower year-to-date percentage is typical and reflects the timing of business license expiration dates and the March payment deadline, when the majority of annual renewals are received.

Investment income is trending well above budget projections, reflecting higher yields on the City’s fixed-income holdings as interest rates have increased. Given prevailing market conditions, additional earnings above the adopted budget are likely in this category. However, the current-year projection remains in place, unadjusted, as investment income can fluctuate with changes in interest rates and cash flow conditions. As a matter of prudent budgeting practice, the City avoids relying on investment income to balance the operating budget and instead treats any excess earnings as a one-time benefit realized at year-end.

Departmental charges for services are trending above the three-year historical average of 50.6%. As of January 31, charges for services total $6,288,906, or 78% of budget realized. This variance is primarily attributable to: (1) the timing of anticipated Fire Department mutual aid reimbursements received in the first half of the fiscal year; (2) increased cost recovery related to subrogation receipts; (3) timing of the cost recovery from the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for downtown rail maintenance at the Orange Street platform; (4) a onetime cash payment in lieu of an art-in-lieu landscaping permit fee associated with a tilt-up building on California Street; and (5) higher-than-anticipated permitting activity in Development Services / Building & Safety.

Conclusions & Outlook
The City enters the second half of FY 2026 on solid financial footing. Through January 31, 2026, the City's revenues and expenditures are generally tracking consistent with historical seasonal patterns. No material yearend variances are currently anticipated.

The broader economic environment warrants continued vigilance. The UCLA Anderson Forecast projects the U.S. and California economies will "muddle through" early 2026, restrained by tariff-driven inflation, policy uncertainty, and a softening labor market, before recovering more meaningfully in the second half of the year and into 2027.

Beacon Economics describes California as "stuck in neutral," with cautious business investment and hiring decisions unlikely to accelerate until the policy environment stabilizes. Regionally, the Inland Empire faces modest growth and structural headwinds, particularly in the logistics sector where trade policy and reduced port activity are constraining a historically dominant industry. HdL Companies confirms that statewide taxable sales growth has moderated considerably, consistent with the City's adjusted sales tax outlook.

Looking ahead, three significant commitments will define the City's near-term fiscal course. First, the City is entering into negotiations with all nine employee bargaining units, whose MOUs are approaching expiration.

Combined with an ongoing Classification and Compensation Study, labor costs (the City's largest General Fund expenditure) will require careful and fiscally responsible deliberation. Second, construction of the long-awaited Safety Hall at 1625 W. Redlands Boulevard, the former Kmart site, is scheduled to begin in July 2026, with completion anticipated in summer 2028. This investment marks a generational commitment to the Redlands Police Department and the community it serves. Third, formal deliberations and presentations to the City Council and public on the FY 2027 & 2028 Biennial Budget will begin in May and June 2026, providing the appropriate forum to address all emerging cost pressures in a structured and transparent manner.

Given the various factors that act on the City’s finances, careful monitoring and strategic financial planning will be essential to mitigate potential long-term budgetary impacts. The decisions made in the coming months on labor negotiations, capital investment, and the upcoming biennial budget will shape the City's financial trajectory for years to come. While the City's budget remains resilient, these external variables warrant continued monitoring to ensure fiscal sustainability and adaptability in the face of evolving economic conditions.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose to approve, modify or table this item.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
SUBMITTED BY:

Danielle Garcia, Management Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 2026
Discussion: There is no fiscal impact associated with receiving and filing this report.

Attachments
Attachment_A_-_FY_2026_General_Fund_Mid-Year_Schedule.pdf Attachment_B_-_Mid-Year_Comparison_of_Revenues_Expenditures.pdf Attachment_C_-_10-Year_Trend_-_Sources_Requirements.pdf Attachment_D_-_General_Fund_Activity_FY_2017-2026.pdf
Attachment_E_-_General_Fund_Committed_Assigned_Reserves.pdf

ATTACHMENT A
Mid-Year Report - General Fund as of January 31, 2026
AVAILABLE FINANCIAL SOURCES: AUDITED1 1/31/2025 % ORIG. BUDGET ADJ. BUDGET 1/31/2026 % BEGINNING FUND BALANCE - UNASSIGNED 52,249,737 49,679,962 36,616,029 51,417,876 51,417,876 REVENUES:

TAXES:

PROPERTY 44,984,981 24,108,439 53.6% 44,025,917 44,938,487 24,621,606 54.8% SALES 26,750,778 11,657,661 43.6% 28,984,386 26,915,810 10,851,947 40.3% MEASURE T SALES 20,337,840 8,169,335 40.2% 20,763,000 20,135,370 9,348,203 46.4% PROPERTY TRANSFER 342,856 29,980 8.7% 598,500 598,500 265,735 44.4% TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 1,979,925 1,028,931 52.0% 1,995,000 1,995,000 934,370 46.8% FRANCHISE 2,685,573 148,179 5.5% 3,726,149 3,365,568 127,135 3.8% MINING 281,228 103,395 36.8% 360,000 360,000 79,319 22.0% TOTAL TAXES 97,363,181 45,245,920 46.5% 100,452,952 98,308,735 46,228,315 47.0% GENERAL GOVERNMENT:

BUSINESS LICENSES 6,050,839 1,066,417 17.6% 5,565,000 6,265,000 796,026 12.7% MOTOR VEHICLE FEES 115,177 115,177 100.0% 65,000 65,000 111,682 171.8% GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE CHARGE 4,322,916 2,501,046 57.9% 4,460,480 4,460,480 2,585,270 58.0% INVESTMENT INCOME 3,545,675 1,655,209 46.7% 250,000 450,000 1,158,118 257.4% OTHER 1,239,934 524,379 42.3% 790,662 790,662 222,134 28.1% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 15,274,541 5,862,229 38.4% 11,131,142 12,031,142 4,873,230 40.5% CHARGES FOR SERVICES: 9,223,702 0.0% #DIV/0!
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 4,179,538 2,035,150 48.7% 3,823,629 3,823,629 2,362,083 61.8% LIBRARY 4,980 2,493 50.1% 44,284 44,284 3,969 9.0%
POLICE 2,568,894 522,468 20.3% 707,550 727,767 334,651 46.0% COMMUNITY SERVICES 698,516 343,802 49.2% 702,779 702,779 362,974 51.6% FIRE 1,425,847 657,998 46.1% 501,300 501,300 508,522 101.4% FACILITIES & ANIMAL SERVICES 2,669,331 1,326,230 49.7% 1,471,283 1,471,283 2,143,067 145.7% ENGINEERING 1,216,154 489,740 40.3% 794,000 794,000 573,640 72.2% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 12,763,261 5,377,881 42.1% 8,044,825 8,065,042 6,288,906 78.0% TOTAL REVENUES 125,400,983 56,486,030 45.0% 119,628,919 118,404,919 57,390,451 48.5% 72,870,469
INTERFUND TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS:

GOVERNMENTAL GRANTS (200) - 67,089 - - - - -
GAS TAX (207) 2,048,335 1,298,981 63.4% 2,103,423 2,103,423 1,219,725 58.0% TRAFFIC SAFETY (223) 170,307 81,167 47.7% 127,000 127,000 102,120 80.4% WATER (501, 503) 281,510 - - 288,804 288,804 - -
SOLID WASTE (511, 513) 68,313 - - 64,306 64,306 - -
SEWER (521) 124,677 - - 27,560 27,560 - -
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 2,760,231 1,380,148 50.0% 2,611,093 2,611,093 1,321,845 50.6% CANCELLATIONS OR DECREASES TO RESERVES:

RESERVE FOR ENCUMBRANCES 8,256,232 - - - 9,803,503 - -
RESERVE FOR LOANS 2,461,644 - - - - - -
RESERVE FOR PREPAIDS 501,110 - - - - - -
RESERVE FOR DONATIONS 15,072 - - - 100,000 - -
RESERVE FOR MAINTENANCE: BLDGS. & IMPROV. - - - 750,000 750,000 - - RESERVE FOR UNFUNDED MANDATES 850,000 - - 750,000 750,000 - - RESERVE FOR CAPITAL: >$50,000 64,707 525 1.9% - 497,700 - - RESERVE FOR PUBLIC BENEFIT 27,390 - - 200,000 200,000 38,667 19.3% RESERVE FOR FIRE EQUIPMENT 65,934 - - - 31,773 - -
RESERVE FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - - - - 29,406 - -
RESERVE FOR FUTURE FACILITIES 2,905,554 - - - - - -
RESERVE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY / HOMELESS 2,527,356 - - - - - - TOTAL CANCELLATIONS OR DECREASES TO RESERVES 17,674,998 525 0.0% 1,700,000 12,162,382 38,667 0.3% TOTAL AVAILABLE FINANCIAL SOURCES 198,085,949 107,546,664 54.3% 160,556,041 184,596,270 110,168,839 59.7% (including beginning Fund Balance - Unassigned)
FY 2025 FY 2026

ATTACHMENT A
Mid-Year Report - General Fund as of January 31, 2026
AUDITED1 1/31/2025 % ORIG. BUDGET ADJ. BUDGET 1/31/2026 % FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS:

APPROPRIATIONS/EXPENDITURES:

CITY COUNCIL 503,181 281,062 55.9% 737,111 737,111 270,266 36.7% CITY CLERK 435,016 192,276 44.2% 510,050 511,378 192,843 37.7% CITY MANAGER (incl. Homeless Solutions in FY 2026) 2,177,970 840,912 38.6% 1,650,941 3,024,113 1,373,051 45.4% HUMAN RESOURCES 5,484,778 3,888,095 70.9% 6,324,740 6,549,851 3,728,568 56.9% CITY ATTORNEY 955,943 527,445 55.2% 825,347 826,283 484,088 58.6% MANAGEMENT SERVICES 3,084,015 1,727,072 56.0% 3,565,391 4,097,213 1,794,912 43.8% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES * 5,518,814 3,058,054 55.4% 6,060,768 6,873,084 3,296,146 48.0% FACILITIES & ANIMAL SERVICES * 22,157,350 12,018,336 54.2% 23,701,792 27,968,131 13,087,472 46.8% COMMUNITY SERVICES * 2,194,349 1,242,306 56.6% 2,552,229 3,005,872 1,406,792 46.8% ENGINEERING 1,945,560 927,572 47.7% 1,685,231 2,009,219 1,078,120 53.7% LIBRARY 3,410,455 1,877,629 55.1% 3,527,376 4,540,608 2,118,022 46.6% POLICE 40,222,820 24,315,350 60.5% 42,349,068 43,646,376 24,843,235 56.9% FIRE 24,071,332 15,785,694 65.6% 23,957,345 25,410,945 14,463,821 56.9% TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 112,161,582 66,681,803 59.5% 117,447,389 129,200,184 68,137,336 52.7% 65,513,765
INTERFUND TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS:

GOVERNMENTAL GRANTS FUND (200) 14,448 - - - - - -
PARAMEDIC FUND (205) 2,627,562 55.9% 5,720,339 5,720,339 2,686,466 4,700,338 47.0% TRAFFIC SAFETY (223) - 23,020 - - - - -
DRBA (236) - 30,394 - 98,145 98,145 - -
PARKING AUTHORITY (237) - 20,426 - 15,722 15,722 - -
CFD 2004-1 (261) - - - 30,000 30,000 - -
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (263) - 23,255 - 26,830 26,830 - - SAFETY / CITY HALL FUND (406) - 2,905,554 - - - - -
CITRUS GROVES (538) - 10,000 - 200,000 200,000 - -
LIABILITY SELF-INSURANCE (602) - 6,918,434 - 6,106,460 6,106,460 - - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (604) - 350,000 - - - - -
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 14,995,869 2,627,562 17.5% 12,197,496 12,197,496 2,686,466 22.0% NEW OR INCREASES TO RESERVES:

RESERVE FOR ENCUMBRANCES - 9,803,503 - - - - -
RESERVE FOR PREPAIDS - 430,838 - - - - -
RESERVE FOR DONATIONS - 446,796 - - - - -
RESERVE FOR PEG FEES - 27,129 - - - - -
RESERVE FOR OPERATIONAL CONTINGENCY - 1,275,000 - - - - - RESERVE FOR FUTURE FACILITIES - 7,527,356 - 3,730,000 3,730,000 - - TOTAL NEW OR INCREASES TO RESERVES 19,510,622 - - 3,730,000 3,730,000 - # #### TOTAL FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 146,668,073 69,309,365 47.3% 133,374,885 145,127,680 70,823,802 48.8% AUTHORIZED USE OF UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE #VALUE! 9,434,873 11,949,286 SOURCES OVER/(UNDER) REQUIREMENTS (831,861) - -
ENDING FUND BALANCE - UNASSIGNED 51,417,876 2
27,181,156 39,468,590

1. These are audited fiscal year-end figures.

2. Actual Unassigned Fund Balance: $53,571,036 - the effect of +$2,153,160.35 in GASB-adjusted investment income. This income is reversed on 7/1 of following fiscal year.

FY 2025 FY 2026
ATTACHMENT B
‐4% 0%
63%
‐8%
4%
8%
9%
13%
16%
13%
2%
‐8%
2%
0 5,000,000
10,000,00015,000,00020,000,00025,000,00030,000,000
General Fund: Expenditures & Transfers Out
Mid‐Year Comparison of Actuals as of Jan. 31
1/31/2025 (Prior Fiscal Year)1/31/2026 (Current Fiscal Year)% Increase/decrease from Prior Year ATTACHMENT B
2%
‐17%
16%
‐4%
0 5,000,000
10,000,00015,000,00020,000,00025,000,00030,000,00035,000,00040,000,00045,000,00050,000,000 Total Taxes Total General Government Total Charges For Services Total Interfund Transfers From Other Funds
General Fund Revenue & Interfund Transfers In
Mid‐Year Comparison of Actuals as of Jan. 31
1/31/2025 (Prior Fiscal Year)1/31/2026 (Current Fiscal Year)% Increase/decrease from Prior Year ATTACHMENT C
City of RedlandsSources & Requirements Trend 2014 to 2024 Actual
FY 2017
Actual
FY 2018
Actual
FY 2019
Actual
FY 2020
Actual
FY 2021
Actual
FY 2022
Actual
FY 2023
Actual
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Projected
FY 2026
Sources 69,693,556 76,134,087 78,823,186 82,051,923 92,133,956 173,196,363 $133,432,111 $141,580,746 $145,836,212 133,178,394Requirements 68,604,598 75,498,019 76,313,656 78,936,333 85,825,893 169,446,861 $123,559,747 $128,316,490 $146,668,074 145,127,680 30,000,000 50,000,000 70,000,000 90,000,000
110,000,000 130,000,000 150,000,000 170,000,000 190,000,000 City of Redlands General Fund
Ten‐Year Sources & Requirements Comparison $ Dollars
ATTACHMENT D GENERAL FUND ACTIVITY: FY 2016 THROUGH 2025

CITY OF REDLANDS

AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED AUDITED FINANCIAL SOURCES: 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE - UNASSIGNED $9,135,636 $10,224,594 $10,860,661 $13,370,190 $16,485,775 $22,793,838 $26,543,340 $36,415,704 $52,249,737 Revenues 65,454,809 $ 70,424,722 72,870,469 74,541,201 82,782,239 107,830,947 116,645,296 120,029,817 125,400,983 Interfund Transfers In 1,768,125 2,125,072 2,802,538 2,568,806 6,379,038 4,083,734 2,307,193 2,850,161 2,760,231 Proceeds from Land Sales - - - - - 43, - 393,103 - -
Decrease in Reserve for Advances Receivable (2)/Loans - - 44,913 224,208 155,086 501,100 135,809 7, 2,461,644 690,541 Decrease in Reserve for Prepaid Items 46,941 151,551 192,259 197,202 183,522 209,601 197,266 22,940 501,110 Decrease in Reserve for Fire Equipment Replacement 136,924 60,000 - - - - - - 65,934 Decrease in Reserve for General Fund Vehicles - 296, 50,000 924 - - - - - Decrease in Reserve for Safety Vehicles - 52,034 - - - - - - Decrease in Reserve for Parking Improvements - - - - - - - 950,000 Decrease in Reserve for General Plan - - - - - - - -
Decrease in Reserve for Maint.: Park Facilities - - - - - - - - Decrease in Reserve for Maint.: Bldg & Improvements - 50,000 11,030 13,464 - - - 500,000 Decrease in Reserve for Capital Repl: HVAC, IT Equipl. - - - - - - - - Decrease in Reserve for Capital Over $50,000 - 302, 108,040 355 - 84,392 55,863 421,256 401,945 64,707 Decrease in Reserve for Unfunded Mandates - - - 100, - 000 - - - 850,000 Decrease in Reserve for PEG Fees - 327, - 464 - 901 1,347 7,357 - Decrease in Reserve for Sidewalk Improvements - - - - - 849, - 538 - Decrease in Reserve for Future Facilities - - - - - 16, - 081,616 257, 2, 547 905,554 Decrease in Reserve for Animal Shelter - - - - - 25,292 - - Decrease in Reserve for Public Benefit - - - - - 159, 747,431 960 260,663 27,390 Decrease in Reserve for Public Safety/Homelessness 2,527,356 Net Activity for donations & deposits reconciliation - 978, 11,854 450 122,465 - - - - Decrease in Reserve for Donations - - - - 33,826 4,262 - - 15,072 Cancellation of Reserve for Encumbrances 2,286,757 1,365,514 2,732,083 4,284,577 2,514,952 - 12, 8,617,132 970,503 8,256,231 TOTAL CURRENT SOURCES 69, $ 76,134,087 693,556 $ 78,823,186 $ 82,051,923 $ 92,133,956 $ 173, $ 133,432,111 196,363 $ 141,580,746 $ 145,836,212 $ FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS:

Expenditures (3) $ 63,266,834 60,521,061 $ 65,513,765 $ 70,565,921 $ 67,416,595 $ 93,814,566 $ 92,497,314 $ 106, $ 112,161,583 747,566 $ Interfund Transfers Out 6,102,083 6,072,848 5,423,918 5,475,096 7,128,009 23, 8,937,560 386,161 18, 14,995,869 483,341 Increase in Reserve for Advances Receivable (2)/Loans 175,944 88,913 - - - 31,255 178,015 - - Increase in Reserve for Loans - - - - - - - 3, - 012,822 Increase in Reserve for Encumbrances 1,365,514 2,732,083 4,284,577 2,514,952 7,083,392 5,887,111 16, - 873,363 9,803,503 Increase in Reserve for Parking Improvements - 1, - 944,001 - - - - - - Increase in Reserve for Prepaids 151,551 192,259 210,180 183,522 196,623 721,316 - - 430,838 Increase in Reserve for Fire Equipment Replacement 60,000 50,000 - - 358, - 142 - - - Increase in Reserve for General Fund Vehicles - - - - - - - - - Increase in Reserve for General Plan - - - - - - - - -
Increase in Reserve for General Fund Contingencies - 163, - 344 - - 946, 562,425 209 - 1,275,000 Increase in Reserve for Maint. Bldgs & Improvements - 163, - 344 - - 946, 562,425 209 - - Increase in Reserve for Capital Over $50,000 150,000 163,344 - 108, - 040 946, 562,425 209 - - Increase in Reserve for Unfunded Mandates - 163, - 344 - - 946, 562,245 209 - - Increase in Reserve for Maint. Prk Playgrnds, Equip. Facilities - - - - - - - - - Increase in Reserve for Capital Replacememnt:HVAC, IT Equip - - - - - - - - - Increase in Reserve for PEG Fees - 410, 58,784 675 76,156 52,844 34,821 41,107 33,083 27,129 Increase in Reserve for Public Benefit - - - - - 14,338 13,800 - - Increase in Reserve for Animal Shelter - - - - 12,646 - - - - Increase in Reserve for Donations - - - - - 51,998 69,068 39,678 446,796 Restate Special Deposits Reserve - - - 12,646 3, - 577,642 - - - Fixed Asset Adjustments - - 822, - 432 - - - - -
Increase in Reserve for Future Facilities - - - - - 38, 2,700,000 193,103 - 7,527,356 Increase in Reserve for Sidewalk Improvements - - - - - 1, - 000,000 - - Increase in Reserve for Public Safety/Homelessness - - - - - 2, - 527,356 - - Net Other Activity Affecting Fund Balance 165,476 - - - - - - - - TOTAL CURRENT REQUIREMENTS 68, $ 75,498,019 604,598 $ 76,313,656 $ 78,936,333 $ 85,825,893 $ 169, $ 123,559,747 446,861 $ 128,316,490 $ 146,668,074 $ CURRENT SOURCES OVER(UNDER) REQUIREMENTS 1, $ 636,067 088,958 $ 2, $ 3,115,590 509,530 $ 6,308,063 $ 3,749,502 $ 9,872,364 $ 13, $ (831,862) 264,256 $ ENDING FUND BALANCE - UNASSIGNED (1) $10,224,594 $10,860,661 $13,370,190 $16,485,775 22,793,838 $ 26,543,340 $ 36,415,704 $ 49,679,961 $ 51,417,875 $

COMMITTED & ASSIGNED FUND BALANCES (RESERVES)
COMMITTED FUND BALANCE (STABILIZATION) 8, $ 8,285,676 122,332 $ 8,285,676 $ 8,285,676 $ 8,285,676 $ 9,231,885 $ 9,794,310 $ 9,794,310 $ 11, $ 069,310 ASSIGNED - ALL CATEGORIES 2,130,916 4,063,636 3,894,566 3,889,142 4,188,184 35, 38,399,189 166,981 36,029,034 37,115,449 ENDING BALANCE - STABILIZATION & ASSIGNED 10,253,248 $ 12,349,312 $ 12,180,243 $ 12,174,818 $ 12,473,860 $ 44,398,866 $ 48,193,499 $ 45,823,344 $ 48,184,759 $ City of Redlands Population (4) 70,196 70,851 71,441 72,863 72,739 72,259 71,972 72,696 73,488 Per Capita Expenditures $854.20 $901.29 $917.03 $968.47 $926.83 $1,298.31 $1,285.18 $1,468.41 $1,526.26 Notes: (1) Does not include Committed and Assigned Fund Balances ATTACHMENT D GENERAL FUND ACTIVITY: FY 2016 THROUGH 2025 (2) Outstanding loans to the Public Facilities Fund from the General Fund to cover debt service of COPs issued in FY 2003-2004 were forgiven in full in FY 2024(3) Expenditures are estimated by departments as fully spent, which includes anticipated carryovers and encumbrances.(4) Department of Finance Population estimates.

ATTACHMENT E 3/17/2026
Object Fund Balance
Committed:
3205   Contingency $ 11,069,310       $ ‐                     $ ‐                       $ 11,069,310 Assigned:
3208    Reserve for Nevada Palmetto ‐ Parks & Rec. 675,864 ‐                     (         ‐ 675,864)3209    Reserve for Nevada Palmetto ‐ Trails Develpmt. 849,935 ‐                     (191,775) 658,1603209    Reserve for Nevada Palmetto ‐ Open Space 847,606 ‐                     (290,000) 557,6063210    Reserve for Nevada Palmetto ‐ Other Imprvmts 36,930 ‐                     ‐                   36,9303302    Reserve for Parking Improvements 994,001 ‐                     (713,403) 280,598 3303    Reserve for Maintenance: Park Facilities 100,000 ‐                     ‐ 100,000 3304    Reserve for Maintenance: Bldgs. & Improv. 1,753,968 ‐                     (850,000) 903,968 3306    Reserve for Unfunded Mandates 1,078,462 ‐                     (750,000) 328,462 3307    Reserve for Capital: HVAC & IT Equip. 200,000 ‐                     ‐ 200,000 3308    Reserve for Capital: >$50,000 847,764 ‐                     (         93,064 754,700)3309    Reserve for Vehicle Replacement 62,506 ‐                     ‐                       62,5063312    Reserve for Fire Equipment 342,208 ‐                     (         79,369 262,839)3318    Reserve for Sidewalk Improvements 150,462 ‐                     (29,406) 121,056 3319    Reserve for Future Facilities 29,175,741 3,730,000      (18,    14,314,057 591,684) 3, 37,115,448      (23, 730,000    17,735,777 109,671)      3, 48,184,758      $ (23,109,671) 730,000    $ 28,805,087 City of Redlands
General Fund Committed/Assigned Fund Balance (Reserves) Fiscal Year 2026
Audited Approved  Estimated Approved
6/30/2025 To Date 6/30/2026 To Date
Balance Increases Balance (Decreases)
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. K1.

DATE: March 17, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider the following applications for an approximately 8.5-acre site located at the northeast corner of Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street within the Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan (APNs: 0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000), by applicant Regency Centers:
a) Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in accordance with Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act b) Measure U Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
c) Amendment to the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan to remove the project site (8.5 acres) from the boundaries of Specific Plan 40 and remove the Special Development (EV/SD) District designation
d) To change the zoning designation 8.5-acre project site from Special Development (EV/SD) District to General Commercial (C-3) District e) A site plan approval and architectural design review to construct a commercial shopping center with approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space consisting of one major tenant grocery building (36,000 square feet), one drivethrough restaurant building (3,900 square feet), four multi-tenant shop buildings (6,600 to 10,000 square feet) and related on-site and off-site improvements including a parking lot, driveways, landscaping, lighting, utilities and drainage improvements
f) A Conditional Use Permit to establish a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control license for a proposed 36,000 square-foot grocery store and to construct and operate a 3,900 square foot drive-through restaurant g) A request to merge three parcels within the project site into one parcel totaling approximately 8.5 acres
PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.

2. Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.

3. Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

4. Mayor calls upon applicant, or his/her representative, for comments and testimony.

5. Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public (3 minutes per speaker)

6. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

7. Mayor calls upon the applicant, or representative, for rebuttal comments (5 minutes).

8. Mayor closes the public hearing.

9. City Council considers the motion and votes.

MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that the Planning Commission's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:
"I move that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 8752 to approve entitlements for the Regency Centers Redlands Marketplace project;" and,
"I move to introduce Ordinance No. 3001."
RECOMMENDATION:

On January 13, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project and voted 7 to 0 to adopt Resolution No. 1732, and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed entitlements for the project. During the hearing, the Commission discussed various aspects of the project. Primary areas of concern were related to vehicle circulation within the project, pedestrian access, and the proposed architecture of the drivethrough facing Tennessee Street. The discussion led to the request of four conditions of approval, which may require:

1. Sidewalk that will be constructed along a portion of the project's northern border to facilitate pedestrian access between the future mixed-use project to the north and the proposed grocery store (Condition of Approval No. 33).

2. The pedestrian sidewalk crossing the southeast project driveway on Lugonia Avenue to be placed further into the site, to shorten the crossing distance. If approved by Council (for a portion of the public sidewalk to meander on private property within the project site), an appropriate easement would be required, and staff would then work with the developer to provide an appropriate easement document prior to permit issuance.

3. The drive-through service window (facing Tennessee St. on the west) to be relocated to allow vehicle queuing after being served. This allows space for customers in their vehicles to wait before entering the project's main drive aisle (Condition of Approval No. 89).

4. The drive-through building (adjacent to Tennessee St.) to include landscape trellises surrounding and adjacent to the building as an architectural enhancement (Condition of Approval No. 90).

BACKGROUND:

Project Description: The proposal includes approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space divided between six buildings, which includes a grocery store anchor tenant (36,000 sq. ft.), a drive-through building (3,900 sq. ft.) and four multi-tenant shops buildings ranging in size from 6,600 to 10,000 sq. ft. The project also includes related on-site and off-site improvements such as parking lot improvements, access driveways, landscaping, lighting, utilities and drainage improvements (see Attachment A – Location Map and Aerial Photo). Related entitlements include requests to remove the site from the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan and change the site’s zoning designation to C-3 (General Commercial), approval of Conditional Use Permits to establish a drive-through restaurant and to allow the sale of alcohol within the grocery tenant space, and a parcel merger to consolidate three parcels into one.

Analysis:

The proposal and project plans were fully evaluated in the staff report prepared for the January 13, 2026, Planning Commission meeting (see Attachment B). Analysis from the previous report is summarized below.

A) General Plan
The project is located within the Commercial land use category of the General Plan (see Attachment C - General Plan Land Use Map). The Commercial land use includes “designated areas for the development of a wide range of commercial uses, including neighborhood-serving stores and convenience centers, regional commercial centers, and commercial recreation.” The proposed shopping center with drive-through restaurant and one major grocery tenant space is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The proposed use is consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the General Plan as listed below.

Policy 3-P.12: Promote Redlands as a destination where visitors can shop, dine, play, and stay, and help create opportunities for increased visitation, hotel stays, sales tax generation, and employment.

Policy 4-P.7: Promote a diversity of compatible land uses throughout the city, providing opportunities for the development of a range of businesses, services, residential types, and public facilities to meet the needs of the community.

Policy 4-P.10: Ensure that the scale and character of new development is appropriate for surrounding terrain and the character of existing development.

Policy 4-P.20: Provide for the concentration of office, industrial, and commercial uses in appropriate locations near transportation corridors to encourage the development of employment centers and reduce the potential for land use conflicts with sensitive uses.

B) Specific Plan Amendment and Proposed Zoning
The project site is currently located in the Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan, which allows for a wide range of commercial, industrial, and office uses (see Attachment D-1 – Existing Zoning Map). The applicant is proposing a Specific Plan Amendment to remove the subject parcel from the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan, in conjunction with a Zone Change to General Commercial (C-3) in accordance with RMC Title 18 (see Attachment D-2 - Proposed Zoning Map). If approved, the change to C-3 zoning would be consistent with the existing C-3 zoning to the immediate north of the subject property (which has entitlements for the Tennessee Village mixed use project).

The General Commercial (C-3) District allows a wide variety of commercial, retail and service uses and allows greater flexibility in terms of grading requirements, setbacks and site landscaping. As proposed, the project complies with all the applicable development standards of the C-3 zoning district. A table detailing the project’s consistency with applicable development standards is included (Attachment E – Table of Zoning Development Standards). Within the C-3 zoning district, drive-through restaurants and alcoholic beverage sales are allowed subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.

C) Commission Review and Approval
New construction over 500 square feet is subject to review by the Planning Commission per RMC Chapter 18.12 and requires Commission Review and Approval for architectural review and site plan review. The proposed project involves construction of a total of approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space on an 8.5-acre site, and therefore, is subject to Commission Review and Approval. Site Plan: The buildings are generally spaced around the perimeter of the site with the main parking area located in the center as shown on the Site Plan (Attachment F) and described below.

Table 1: Building Summary
Development Standards: The project will meet or exceed all development standards for the C-3 District. A Summary of Development Standard is included in the table below. A table and detailed summary of the development standards for the project is attached to this report (see Attachment E – Table of Zoning Development Standards).

Table 2: Summary of Development Standards
Vehicular Access: Five access points are proposed for the project site. The primary access points are a signalized entry on the Lugonia Avenue frontage at the Home Depot entrance, and an unsignalized entry near the center of the project’s Tennessee Street frontage. Secondary access points are located near the northwest corner of the site on Tennessee Street and the southeast corner of the site on Lugonia Avenue. The fifth (internal) access driveway, approximately 30 ft. wide, is from the commercial portion of the future Tennessee Village mixed-use project located to the north. Large truck deliveries to the grocery tenant would access the site at the northwest and southeast entries, which provide direct access to the loading dock area behind the store in the northeast (rear) of the site.

The Planning Commission requested relocation of the pedestrian crossing of the southeastern project driveway on Lugonia Avenue. Staff is recommending against including a Condition of Approval requiring this. Based on the Planning Commission's request, the crossing would be placed approximately 20 feet toward the interior of the site.

This would reduce the distance that pedestrians would need to walk across the driveway/drive aisle. However, this is a significant deviation from the City's standard, and the requested crossing configuration would not be consistent with other crossings along the remaining portions of Lugonia Avenue or within the City. Staff believes that due to the uncommon location of the requested crossing, drivers may not expect pedestrians here, and they may be less visible, which poses an additional safety issue. For these reasons, the requested Condition of Approval has not been included.

Traffic Impact Analysis: A traffic study was prepared by qualified traffic engineers and reviewed by the City’s Land Use Engineering Division. The study evaluated the potential for transportation impacts resulting from the development of the proposed project. As shown in the study (see Attachment G – Traffic Impact Analysis), the addition of the proposed project creates reductions in the Level of Service (LOS) at two adjacent roadway intersections. Therefore, the applicant is required to make modifications to these intersections. The required modifications are listed below and are included as conditions of approval.

1. At the intersection of W. Lugonia Avenue and the Home Depot parking lot entrance, the traffic signal timing of the signal must be modified to improve the existing plus project traffic conditions to LOS C during the PM peak hour.

2. At the W. Lugonia Avenue and Texas Street intersection east of the project, northbound Texas Street will require restriping to add a 40-foot left turn lane and one northbound right turn/through lane within the existing right-of-way. After completion of these improvements, the intersection will operate at LOS C.

It should also be noted that the project is required to improve and widen the adjacent roadways along the project frontages to the street centerline as designated by the City’s General Plan as part of their development plan. The project will build an additional northbound lane on Tennessee Street and an additional westbound lane on Lugonia Avenue.

Landscaping: The proposed plant palette consists of a combination of trees, shrubs, accent plants, and ground cover (Attachment H – Landscape Plans). The project features a prominent landscaped plaza area at the corner of Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street. This plaza area provides outdoor seating, landscaping, and pedestrian pathways into the site. Along the Lugonia frontage, buildings are set back 30 feet and parking areas are set back 15 feet from the right-of-way. Along Tennessee Street, the service lanes for the drive-through are set back approximately 24 feet, and the building is set back 38 feet. The building with the shortest setback distance from the adjacent roadways is the Shops 1 building, which is positioned at a slight angle along Tennessee Street, with setbacks ranging from 19 feet at its closest point to approximately 29 feet. All of these setbacks exceed the minimum requirement of the C-3 District and provide adequate space for decorative landscaping, as well as screening for cars within the drive-through and the site. There is no minimum overall site landscaping requirement in the C-3 zoning district. In total, the site includes 61,957 square feet of landscaping, which covers 16.9% of the site. Projects within the C-3 district are required to landscape at least 7% of the parking area, and the project will provide over 11,949 square feet (9.6%) of landscaping in the parking areas. The project complies with the required landscaping standards.

Architectural Design: The architectural elevations for the project utilize a contemporary style with a variety of materials (see Attachment I-1). Overall, buildings within the project are generally consistent with the City’s Architectural Design Guidelines. Buildings provide vertical and horizontal projections, short tower elements to offset the rooflines, recessed areas, decorative exterior lighting, stone veneer, and economical metal awnings. Multiple building materials and finishes are proposed, and architectural treatment is provided on all sides of the buildings.

The building will incorporate an earth-tone color palette and corner tenant suites include full-height accent brick veneer accents. Rooftop equipment will be fully screened by parapets for all buildings and will not be visible from Lugonia Avenue or Tennessee Street. The project's consistency with the City's Architectural Design Guidelines is included in Attachment I-2)
Parking: The project is designed as a neighborhood shopping center, which may include a variety of uses permitted by the C-3 District. RMC Section 18.164.240 requires one parking space for every 200 square feet of building area within a neighborhood center. Based upon the proposed building square footage (71,400 sf), the project is required to provide 357 parking spaces. As proposed, the project includes 357 parking spaces, 11 of which are compact. All parking stalls and drive aisles meet the minimum requirements.

D) Conditional Use Permit No. 1207 (Grocery Store Alcohol Sales) The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of alcohol for off-site consumption within the grocery store. Chapter 18.190, “Alcohol Beverage Sales Establishment Regulations,” of the Redlands Municipal Code (RMC) requires “conditional use permits for newly established alcohol beverage sales activities." This approval allows the review of the general operational characteristics of the store and the application of Conditions of Approval to ensure that there will be no negative impacts as a result of alcohol sales. As proposed, all alcohol sales will occur inside the store, and the business will also require a separate operating license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The applicant is requesting the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption off the premises, which requires a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) ABC license.

The grocery store is located within Census Tract 80.01. According to California ABC, there are no other Off-Sale licenses within this census tract. However, four (4) Off-Sale licenses may be permitted. Therefore, Tract 80.01 is not considered an area of undue concentration in terms of ABC licenses, and no findings of public convenience or necessity are required.

Operational Characteristics: The grocery retail business proposes to operate daily from 6:00 AM to 12:00 AM. The applicant expects the store to be staffed with approximately 40 employees total per day, with approximately 15 employees per shift. There is no specific floor plan or interior store design at this time, and the precise location and square footage of the alcohol sales area is not known. The applicant has stated that the alcohol display area is expected to occupy approximately 1,000 square feet (likely less) of the store’s floor space. The beer, wine, and distilled spirits sales will be an incidental part of the total grocery store business, and the alcohol display area only represents a small portion of the store. Most customers can be expected to purchase alcoholic beverages incidentally while shopping for other groceries.

E) Conditional Use Permit No. 1208 (Drive-Through Restaurant) Per Redlands Municipal Code Section 18.156.360, drive-through restaurants within the C-3 District require approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a 3,900 square-foot drive-through with two service lanes. This building is located in the northwest portion of the site.

The future tenants of the drive-through and their exact operational characteristics are unknown at this time. The building is proposed to be 3,900 square feet. The C-3 District does not limit hours of operations for commercial activities. The applicant has indicated that the proposed drive-through would likely operate from 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM, with potential delivery operations after those hours. The drive-through is expected to employ 10–20 people with 4–6 employees per shift.

The Municipal Code also lists drive-through specific development standards. Details on the project’s ability to meet the required development standards are included in the attached Planning Commission staff report. With the addition of the conditions of approval required by the Planning Commission, the project is in compliance with these development standards.

The drive-through is located on Lugonia Avenue, which is designated as a Major Arterial roadway, and Tennessee Street, which is a Minor Arterial within the General Plan Circulation Element, and therefore meets the location requirements for a drive-through. Each drive-through is required to provide space for six vehicles to stack in line.

Space is provided for approximately 15 vehicles. In addition, the proposed project meets the screening requirements for drive-through lanes by employing a combination of decorative block walls surrounding the drivethrough and landscape screening.

It is the policy of the city to require a higher than typical quality of architectural treatment for drive-through uses, per Redlands Municipal Code Section 18.156.370. The applicant's proposed architecture for the drive-through is included as Attachment I-1. As previously described in this report, the Planning Commission added a Conditions of Approval requiring the applicant to include additional landscape trellises on the project plans. This requirement is included in Condition of Approval No. 90. In addition, the Planning Commission also required a Condition of Approval related to the location of the drive-through service window. As currently shown on the project site plan, space is not available for vehicles to queue after being served at the drive-through. The Planning Commission added a Condition of Approval requiring the relocation of the drive-through service window to allow additional queuing space of approximately 20 feet. These details are not included in the attached elevations or site plan.

However, the applicant will be required to update the project plans to comply with these conditions prior to issuance of a building permit.

F) Lot Merger
The project includes a proposed lot merger, which would combine three parcels into one for development purposes. The southwest portion of the project site includes a small former well site (APNs: 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000), which is approximately 2,500 square feet in size. This former well site would be merged with APN 0167-171-16-0000, which is approximately 8.4 acres. The General Commercial (C-3) District does not have minimum lot sizes, or lot width and depth requirements. The proposed merger will allow construction of the project without building across property lines and will enable the project to comply with all other development standards.

Therefore, the proposal conforms with the development standards established within the General Commercial (C3) District. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring the lot merger to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit.

G) Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
In accordance with the provisions of the Principles of Management Development within the Redlands General Plan, a Socio-Economic Cost Benefit study was prepared (Attachment J). Based on this analysis, the project will not create an unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community. The project will result in a positive annual revenue/cost ratio of 7.65, with annual non-residential revenues anticipated to be approximately $362,574 to the City upon project completion and annual ongoing costs of approximately $47,414. This results in an annual positive balance of approximately $315,160 (or ratio +7.65).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The City retained an environmental consultant to fully analyze the project and prepare an Initial Study in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (see Attachment K-1 – IS/MND). In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was made available for public review and comment for 30 days (State Clearinghouse No. 2025100841). A Notice of Intent was filed with the County Clerk on October 17, 2025, and with the State Clearinghouse. The IS/MND was circulated for 30 days between October 17, 2025, and November 19, 2025. The IS/MND was also made available via the City’s website (www.cityofredlands.org/post/environmental-documents). No comments were received during the public review and comment period.

The Initial Study recommends a Mitigated Negative Declaration with 10 mitigation measures that pertain to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. All mitigation measures will ensure that any environmental effects are less than significant.

After mitigation, no significant effects were identified as a result of the project, and the recommended mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project as mandatory Conditions of Approval. The Mitigation/Monitoring and Reporting Program details the mitigation measures and is included as Attachment K-2.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. The City Council may choose to continue this item and direct staff to address any issues or bring back additional information; or,

2. The City Council may continue the public hearing and direct staff to prepare findings for denial of their request.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Sean Reilly, Principal Planner

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year:

Revenue Generating:

Amount:

Budgeted Y/N:

Account No.:

Additional Appropriation Required:

Discussion:

Attachments
Attachment_A_Location_Map_and_Aerial_Photograph_-_Copy.pdf Attachment_B_PC_Staff_Report_of_January_13_2026_-_Copy.pdf Attachment_C_General_Plan_Land_Use_Map_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_D-1_Existing_Zoning_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_D-2_Proposed_Zoning_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_F_Site_Plan_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_G_Traffic_Study_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_H_Landscaping_Plans_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_I-1_Architectural_Elevations_Renderings_and_Materials_-_Copy.pdf Attachment_J_Socio-Economic_CostBenefit_Analysis_-_Copy.pdf Attachment_K-1_Initial_StudyMitigated_Negative_Declaration_-_Copy.pdf Attachment_L-2_Land_Use_Engineering_Conditions_of_Approval_-_Copy.pdf Ordinance_3001Zone_Change.pdf
Resolution_No_8752.pdf
Attachment_E_Table_of_Development_Standards_-_Copy.pdf
Attachment_I-2_Consistency_with_Architectural_Guidelines_-_Copy.pdf Attachment_K-2_Mitigation_Monitoring_Reporting_Program_-_Copy.pdf Ordinance_No_3001_Summary.pdf
Project Location


 

 

! "#$%%!&&!$ '"( )*+(%,-./.0. 1((+! "0+(23454657378 '

9*#',:2 ; <=>;?@ ABC 
DE 

F
G
HH
C

D


HHDIJ

KLMN
CD  
C


 E 
DE
CD
DOG

P
O 



 D FE
E H C

Q P
HJ
 <R5Q@QDCE 
R

DD
DH CC

<>STUVWTVTWTUWSSSS?STUVWTVTWTTW SSSS?

348XN4X4N47N3333@L 4L
G

 G
P Q C

D




G



D
G

 HD
GDGD
JHD H
D
DE HDY C

CCD

C FE C
4M3XZE 

D


PD
J


O

CL 7LCNC
JC5A
O
HD H
D
DE HDH
HDY C

CCD

C FE

OD L6LJ
J
LMMH CC

Z3[D \O 
J
E 
R

DD
DH CC

<H CC

LZ3@D JP E HDY C C

G
HHDIJ

KLM
CD DJE ]O

D H CC

Z3

D JP E <H C

Q P
HJ
R5Q@Q G


L ZL^
E

G LZK7[D \O CE

G E _

G
G


E 
HHDIJ

KLMN
CD HDY C DJH C

Q P
HJ
<R5Q@QDC
D

JJ DC

<N6@QDCL MLJJ
 P F

HHDP

L`X8[D \O D H


HHDP




DCE COD

G
D P FC
DOC
CJJ DC

EHH
GC
 DFE
HHDIJ

X4?Z33\O
D   CJJ DC

H
C C

G
J
YD

GDC D]O


G<68?333N\O
D  @?

DP N EDOGED 
OD

]O


G<6?`33N\O
D  @?ODJO
N

EH]O


G<8?83343?333 \O
D  @

D



N 

N JHDP J

C
O

G
H
Da
G
?
CC 
DP F
?

C
H
G?
GE
G?O
 


D


G JHDP J
L 8L


  DJL473K[D \O C
DOC

H D
 
6?`33\O
D 
DP N EDOGED 
OD

HODO

 C
4KL4M8L683E 


O
CH


L XL


  DJL473X[D \O  
]
E
H 74<N


D

@
CE
C A P D
G 
D

C
 D
HDH
68?333\O
D NGDC DD L KL
DG DL46[D \O J DG ED H
DC
FE
E HDY C 

H
DC



G
HHDIJ

KLM
CD D
P
HJ
HODH L 
bc,-
b*b 
45K578?M>MX
D
G

 J
EH>55

E
LCJ5HD
d
GdJ JLCJe \f8MK6gD Pd
OJf3gJ
fI D

gD


fDO g
fX66M74543
 




 
 



 



 

 



 !
 "
# 



 $%%#

 &! 
 
'$


 
(% 

)
"*

#
 
*'$


 %!#+
 
 



 !
  "
#



 ,


-#.
/!

"

% "
#%


# 0%%#
-#.
 &!1%


# #
2 
# (
#.

 #(% 
')
"*

#
  %!3

4' 





'#56
! 7#

'!%!
% +
1%


# # 
1%


# #



# (% 
')
"*

#
  82/

!" /!






 "90'



:1 " 


!" #%


# 4

 2



 2(

#&


 
!
;

# !
<
 #=
!
0>4, !?2%
#


9
'

 7
 %#" 2
'

7
%#"!
;

##
% #
% 
%

 




480 @



 %;
 



2
%;
#
7
2
#2






(
 (!$1>0
;01>0 5%"$1>0 ABCACDEF /!


 
 %#



 "41,>>
G%  
 

#

##;=

 ;%
#

1=!
!
 %#
"
!
$81>>>
1#

'!%!;%
#

$1@>>
# %% 
'
!

;%
#





: 818>>
>1>>>
/!
<

 %#
 #'# '






%!

6
 



1

#

="
1 #


1
!
1%



##






2!2H-
 (
I2!7H

* #
 

 %#G%


!

 ! 
 "
#



#!!

J
:
#


'$
 
 1


  #

 .




;

!#

'!%!
%#  =!
   ! =
!
!"

1#
 

#!



KELMNBCOPQ /!
<

% "


 
#%


# #3



 
%
"

#
! !




%
"
%

#
% % %



%


I!=
1
% % %
 !

"
#;=@9>#@9,;
#%
!




 !
< R"
1

  

#
 #
 

!
;


#
!&!*# #
/!

#
 #
 


!



"!
;#


 
;"! 
%
 
%
 "3
!! 1 %##
>>@
#'! 
!! !


#
<

* "=

#
 
<
!
;


#;%
!
<

 R>,1!-%


<=



#;"!
"%
/!


<

 #!
981004
(

2#R
!

#

"!
#

SS T
GU809$V
S%U>V#U V ##U%V
#U4$$0>



























 
!





"#$







%




&''

'

&




 



!









%
(()*)# 





 














+








 



!





#,*
'


%


-'
$.
***
/


''



01023454
6

 







(''




6

 '
(& 6

7

 
(''




8








'
 

''



%&














''




''


9 











& 


'










6





 













%





6

 


%
 
(

#:
%
('' ;&$):'
<


















 




















-



'
'
 
#&=:'



'
%














'

%













%

'

 




'' 
#&$*:









'






 



-



'
 
#&)*:







''

















'

'
'



 















>


 '
'



? 








@


'
@
!A@
@


!
( 





''








'
@&$B-
?7

 








 '
'
 
'



%



'

!
(



?
(
6

(''
(&;

 
$.
<

7
(


 '
@&)


?7

 
(&;
6

(''
@




''












-%
'
 
/
'




%C














'





%



'



(&;D

%





E





%



'




 '
B %
? @


'


F
(&;D



&


%








%





(G


'


E

/


( G


'









'
(@%

$A.A),
":"=7 
H
'


:AA



'A
II'
''J

/K,".;L

I'K*L'
K-
L

K
LK=;;");A$*







 

















 


!

" !


#$%#&




















%'










(


)#*+








$%,


-



*

 






% 
.

/'

 






















0













.

"


1




% '

#/2 .

34567589:;<= 34567589>5?=34567589@AB;C5A8 !

!
0
 DE*
F


#"G

'

D*H

" '



.

 .
# E*E.

" '



.

 .
& E*H 

" I 



 .
D $* 

" I 



 .
+ #*

"



F


!

!
0


 '
 )#*+ 
J



/1











%'








 
K




I 








L
G



*

  
K












M'



.



%.




 













'



.






 



I 



%'










'



J

(
,







%'


(


D,,














%I

0





 



















*










 0














% 
I

 /'










*
*


*
 

"


NOI



%'








 




,DK %P
*



E#*H)





 *




#E%HQ


%





,D






)Q


0 


*









##*H+H



"H%EQ

 


0 


*



(






% '







&DH










(











%










%'













R
*.



'


2

2(%1



















 

%(


)HQ









 



*








%'




 


,






 






MR

S
I

 T






!



 


%I

 






0 














!

% '












K







I 




 '



.

%'







 *

 








% 

I 


* 



0D



0 






0#


#F$F&E*/)!

P


/FF



%FU
U
%V
WE$DX

UWX
WS(

X


W
XW)DD&+F#





 
 







 
  
 

!"  



 

#



 
$  

  
  












$%
 
 



% 


  
 &
!'  

 
(
 


 




 


  


  )

*+
#

,


&-.



 
 
#!



 


 


(   





 




 


 
/

 

 
 

 


 



 0 


#











1 
 '


+
#





&
! '  
'


   




 




# 

 
2
34 
5 
'


6 

+
'


 7898:;<=8>?@?A>BACBD8EFGC8=8>?HC;<;I8BJ;=<:G8IK L /M( "NO L&
 /M( PQO 

 /M(  /2R-
#R
6! S 2L

6!PS 3
2
!6N!S )26$%SO *
M
  PPO T  
U
 /-

U
R-
#R  
V!RO W
 L



/-  M( $,%Q O X


LL



YQ-  %Q





O X


Y$ PP $

ZPP !NY

 "!



 !NY


  2$$

6 O 
 
'
+
 

 
#  1





 

2
U
$6W
  

 
#


  
& S 
'
[  T  

  

 1

# 



 
 
 

 


 
-
  



  




 

 
 
   
  

 






 
  


 

M
(

 




  


  L

 
#R 
& R 
'
[      
U
6  
M 
& 
+&   

# 



   
M-& $"$$YP 
M 
& 

 


 

   
 






\ 
$Z"Z,N+NYX-X 

\

+ZZ Z
 ]
]^(V,N"!_]VP_V3

_
V_ VY!!NNZ$P



 






 



 
 
    
 


  

 ! " #$%  &
'()*&


+ ,-
. 
 

 



 


()/ 

 ! 01"1$2
 -
  "$$ 2





3 
 


2 
%# 1$$ + 2
)4#-
  &   
 )4#-
   
 
  -
     
2

 


 ( 


 2




"05  &(    2

6
 &


 ( 


 
-  


   "$ 


(  2

 &( -
  
     7
& -
  
 2

8
 -
  
 9
-
  

 



   
 4
 2
  


 
 
 &    
   

 4
 


2

  /+
: ,
6 "$!%/(


 
+ ,
 


 ! 40)0$(

 
 
()/  2


 ;
  .

 (

   
- 



  
)7$$ 2

() /  

  

    (


-
4.$$&
 .$$,
   
 (

 
 $("$1(0 
   


   (

 
  / 5 

2

   

 /(

  



 
 
  
 

 


 ! 40)#$
   (

  <

&
 
 
 & 9 
&=,

 8
 /(

< .8(

  2
    -     
%
    4  -(

 +>(

  2


 



((
2

  
  
  
2

 


 


- 


(

  

 &
.> 2

2



?!?"04.4#,
,&
>

 .??  
?@
@


A 2B04!)C@

B$C
B8CB
CB#))4"0? $










!

 



"

#
$


%

#
 
&&


#
%

#



 


'





$



#( 




()&









*
+
$


 
&&#
&
#
,
&








#



 

$
&
 

+
-
###(&


'.







#


*

$

#

/ '


#
0 1'



2
34 +5#
'(45&


6.
#










(&$(.


&$(


(7 862

9+





(










#



#

#


*
'
&



( /'


#
51+5#
'(3




*



 

8/8:3

&*
&(

+



 .

#)#





+
.
#

$& 

 '




;8

'


0#9
)





 

#



#

$#
#

%


*



 8:



-)

 <'


;8

'
+%






*


$
+% 

&.



= 





$




>



 &



%



 &('
#


##




&
 
8: 
5 

$





*
.

#&

*
&(

*






&



$(


(7?-


 #
+
*
&$



$
+

 
&
$
8

'
 23
6-#
@< /?(
'
3 +
*






 $


##

(


+
 
.



6-#

&


 

#
 

A B'
C
2
$
#



D


 /3.
B

#
&(
$

$
 

E+
&

&













'






&$

#



'
&





$
& .



#

9
#
'
C

 /'C3+

.




$&


#


 #&

.
+(</: ?3'C +

(

&


+
  &


($
$(8

' /

$
(3

0

&(< /&
$
(3
';
/

$
(3 :

>



/
$
3




&
& '

'C



: &






0& 
/=3: &
$#

+
+
  
 




#'C

$ 
(.

>><

4 --
'
5
#

4>>
(

#>
F
F###G.H


IF
#H I#H2%
IH

IH

<>
 







 

















 
 






!

 

"




 #
!

 


$








!






 
!


%&
'


 #
 








!


 




 





!

 


(




(


!



  

 
 

'
&

)
(
!


!


)








% 
!





 


 
) 


*



'

 




  

(











 





#
 





 
* 












) !



 













 
 


 


#
*

+
)


,



&



 
 







 #
















# ! #
 






!



  









 #
 

 








 













 
 





(
  


!



 




-,

.

 

/
 





#
!


!

 




 
 
 (
 




!




/

 





!

 +01
2345635363362222#
 

78
7 8

8,#
!



 


#$
*


9 


!


!



!

01
2345635363462222#
!



 

:" 


; 



+
8<,
=



(
 


9#



!

  

* 




!



!
 



/
!


  


 
 
!

 



/



!





(
 
  
#




 
!



(
 
 



!



; 



+
8<,
=


 

(




* 






 


 



 
 ;,

%8> 

?' 
% @
 
!



( 



0 



  
=(
 
!



A
  ; 

0  #

%8> 


' 

!

+
 
B,
'


  
#


/
!




 








(


(


  


/
!





(
 

( ?


7$#
!

 

 8  

( 
 


 

C<
#$7"






/

  
 

  


 

C"7#







 

(

 
  

C<
$#$$:
+

D7$, EFGHIJFKEFLMN
IEGHEO 



 

 (  

 
 




 
9


/
 


@ 

% 
 
!





 
> (  

P


+
>P,
+

 
Q8

R
@%?
1=, @
 
!




>P
;
 #


@ 

%?

1(
=

+@%?
1=, !

(





(!
 
 

<

+%

 

1 S2ST322UV3,

1

@  
!


!




 

)



7#


$#
 
!


 %

 



@%?
1=
!



<

!


7#


$#
  1(

W#


$




(!
@ 

%
 


1(
=

!

 
(


(



&
!
+XXXYZ[\]^_`abcdebfY^`ghi^f\haej[`^ekae\dc6b^Zlkae\f,
1  
!
(
 




(!
 
 




@ 

%
 



1(
=

!





 

'


A#




A#
m9
 
m9


#
1#

?:?
#
$$7
0 0 
 
@

?? 
? nno*p$:<q(n pqp>   q
pqp7<<$
:?
 ----------------------
 









   





  





   

   


   



  















   







 





 





  

  


 




   










!"#

$%&'%&() 


 




*

 









 



  
 +,-.//,&'01%.&)
2



 




 

 









    



 
3
456#






 


 






 

3 
7
 



 





 /.1%.&)
8


 
  



 







 
  98




 
  



 
3
456#



  

: 




 

3 
7
 


  

  


  





;



< "= 
2 
<






; 



3
>>

<  


3
?@;


A

3
?B#; 

  
 



3
C5D; 

 
E
 
3
4#@5


4#@B;




F


3
469 0GGHIJKLMGN 
:

F 



2:
 
 
:

O





7"4:
=P  
A  
7"#:


A  
=:




7

<

 
Q:
< 

 
O:

F
 

 
R"4:
=
 



  
R"#:
 
 
 
7 
O


4B#D

>:>5

 


8
:
 
 SST*UD>B6VSU@V
U=P
V


UV
U566>#C4@


    
    





 
 
   !
"

 #$ %& 
  !
'
$
 $

  (
 )
  *
"
(

 %
+ ",
'  *
'

 
 

 
& "#-#'./ 0
0, )$)   

## 
 +
#11
+234.0-
5&1465
4
75
  45 4,

0'"6#"6
Project Location
ZONE CHANGE NO. 482 (EXISTING ZONING)
ZONE CHANGE NO. 482 (PROPOSED ZONING)
228'
154'
65'
65'
65'
29'
58'
60'
15' LANDSCAPE

SETBACK

MONUMENT SIGN,
TYP.

PYLON SIGN

COVERED SHORT-TERM

SPACES FOR PICK-UP

AND DELIVERY

DEDICATION
TRASH

ENCLOSURE,
TYP.

MONUMENT SIGN
30' BUILDING

SETBACK
10' X 20'

LOADING SPACE

ACCESSIBLE

TESLA EVSE
TESLA
EQUIP.
10' X 20'

LOADING
SPACE
TESLA PULLTHRU STALLS
TESLA
EVSC,
TYP.
1 6
7 9 10
12 13 14 15
2 3
40'
8 11
7'-2"
LEVEL 2 EVCS
4 5
96'
26'-0"
19'-0"
TYP.
9'-0"
20'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0"
19'-0"
26'-0"5'-0" 9'-0"
10'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0"
26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0"
18'-0" 18'-0"
26'-0"
8'-0"
15'-0"
15'-0"
8'-10" 11'-0"
6'-0"
7'-0"
40'-0"
30'-0" 50'-0"
19'-6"
18'-0"
32'-1"
15'-0"
TYP.

TYP.
9'-0" 50'-0" CLR.
26'-0"
26'-0"
30'-10"
17'-0"
53'-0"
62'-4"
18'-0"
TYP.
9'-0"
18'-0"
15'-0" 8'-0"
26'-0"
5'-6"
5'-6"
± 10'-0"
30'-0"
± 34'-2"
16'-0"
24'-11"
26'-0"
26'-0"
12'-0" ± 38'-0"
6'-2"
6'-0"
7'-0" 9'-0"
4'-0"
18'-0"
18'-0" 19'-0"
19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0"
1'-0"
19'-0"
1'-0" 18'-0"
17'-0" 6'-0" 26'-0"
6'-0" TYP. 6'-0" TYP.
26'-0"
5'-0"
15'-0"
155'
123' 106'
110'
EXISTING APN: 0167-171-11 TO

BE MERGED WITH OVERALL
PARCEL
N.T.S.

VICINITY MAP

LUGONIA AVE
210 FREEWAY
10 FREEWAY

SITE SUMMARY
CURRENT ZONING: EV/SD
PROPOSED ZONING: C-3
NET LAND AREA: ±356,152 SF (±8.18 AC)
BUILDING AREA: ±71,400 SF
COVERAGE: 20.1%
FAR: .20
PARKING REQUIRED: 357 STALLS
1 PARKING PROVIDED: 357 STALLS
ACCESS. STALLS REQ’D: 8 STALLS (7 REG + 1 VAN)
2 ACCESS. STALL PROVIDED: 9 STALLS (8 REG + 1 VAN)
EVCS STALLS REQUIRED: 3 STALLS (2 DCFC + 1 LEVEL 2)3,4
EVCS STALLS PROVIDED: 17 STALLS (16 DCFC + 1 LEVEL 2)
COMPACT STALLS ALLOWED: 83 STALLS
5 COMPACT STALLS PROVIDED: 11 STALLS
PARKING RATIO: 5.0/1000 1
Based on Redlands Municipal Code, Section 18.164.240:

Neighborhood Center: 1/200 (based on gross floor area) 2 Based on 2022 CBC Table 11B-208.2
3 Based on 2022 CAGBC Table 5.106.5.3.6 power allocation method EVCS = Electric Vehicle Capable Spaces
EVSE = Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment
4 Based on 2022 CBC 11B-228.3.2.1
5 Per Redlands Municipal Code, Section 18.164.260:

First 25 spaces must be standard size, 25% of the remaining parking may be compact spaces (357 - 25 = 332 x .25 = 83 spaces)
For each compact space, 30 SF of landscape shall be provided in parking area in addition to min. landscape requirements (11 x 30 = 330 SF) NOTES:

SIGNAGE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.

PROJECT DIRECTORY
OWNER:

REGENCY CENTERS
915 WILSHIRE BLVD, STE 2200
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

RAY KAYACAN
[email protected]
213-553-2217
ARCHITECT:

KTGY GROUP
17911 VON KARMAN AVE, STE 200
IRVINE, CA 92614

JENNIFER WEIGAND
[email protected]
949-797-8306
ENGINEER:

KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES
3801 UNIVERSITY AVE, STE 300
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501

JOHN POLLOCK
[email protected]
951-346-2807
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

CDPC
1675 SCENIC AVE, STE 200
COSTA MESA, CA 92626

ERIK PETERSON
[email protected]
949-399-0870 X212

SHEET INDEX

ARCHITECTURAL

LANDSCAPE
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
A11
A12
A13
A14
A15
A16
A17
A18
A19
A20
A21
A22
A23
A24
A25
A26
A27
A28
A29
A30
A31
A32
A33
A34

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

PEDESTRIAN & TRUCK PATH EXHIBIT

MAJOR A CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN

MAJOR A CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN

MAJOR A CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
MAJOR A CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS

MAJOR A CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS
SHOPS 1 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
SHOPS 1 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN
SHOPS 1 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
SHOPS 1 CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS
SHOPS 1 CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS
SHOPS 2 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
SHOPS 2 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN
SHOPS 2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
SHOPS 2 CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS
SHOPS 2 CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS
SHOPS 3 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
SHOPS 3 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN
SHOPS 3 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
SHOPS 3 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
SHOPS 3 CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS
SHOPS 3 CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS
SHOPS 4 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
SHOPS 4 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN
SHOPS 4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
SHOPS 4 CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS
SHOPS 4 CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS
PAD 1 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
PAD 1 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN
PAD 1 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
PAD 1 CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS
PAD 1 CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS

COLOR & MATERIAL BOARD
L-1
L-2

CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN

PLANT IMAGE GALLERY
Regency Centers Redlands Marketplace Conceptual Design
Redlands, CA December 12,2025
888.456.5849 | ktgy.com
No. 20221044
Conceptual Site Plan A1
0 40 80 Scale: 1” = 40’
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis
Prepared for:

City of Redlands
October 14, 2025
Prepared by:
11845 W Olympic Blvd, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Phone: 213 267 2332
www.gentecsol.com
cff>GTS
gentecsol.com
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 i
Table of Contents

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 a) Description of the proposed project ................................................................................ 1 b) Scope of analysis ........................................................................................................... 1

2. Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 6

3. Existing Conditions................................................................................................................. 8 a) Existing roadway system ................................................................................................ 8 b) Public transit and active transportation ........................................................................... 9 c) Existing traffic volumes ................................................................................................... 9 d) Existing intersection level of service ..............................................................................13

4. Project Trip Forecasts ...........................................................................................................14 a) Project trip generation ...................................................................................................14 b) Project trip distribution & assignment .............................................................................15

5. Existing Plus Project Conditions ............................................................................................20 a) Existing plus project volume forecasts ...........................................................................20 b) Existing plus project intersection level of service ...........................................................20

6. Site Access ...........................................................................................................................26

7. On-site Circulation.................................................................................................................26

8. Queuing Analysis ..................................................................................................................26

9. Mitigations .............................................................................................................................27 Appendices ...............................................................................................................................29 Appendix A: Scoping Memorandum ......................................................................................30 Appendix B: Count Data ........................................................................................................31 Appendix C: Synchro Analysis ...............................................................................................32 Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 ii
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1. Site plan (source: City of Redlands) ........................................................................... 3 Exhibit 2. Location map .............................................................................................................. 4 Exhibit 3. Study intersections ..................................................................................................... 5 Exhibit 4. Level of service criteria for signalized intersections .................................................... 6 Exhibit 5. Existing peak hour traffic volumes (Intersections 1-4) ................................................10 Exhibit 6. Existing peak hour traffic volumes (Intersections 5-8) ................................................11 Exhibit 7. Existing peak hour traffic volumes (Intersections 9-11) ..............................................12 Exhibit 8. Existing conditions peak hours levels of service ........................................................13 Exhibit 9. Project trip generation ...............................................................................................14 Exhibit 10. Trip distribution ........................................................................................................15 Exhibit 11. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at driveways .......................................16 Exhibit 12. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 1-4 .............................17 Exhibit 13. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 5-8 .............................18 Exhibit 14. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 9-11 ...........................19 Exhibit 15. Existing with project peak hours traffic volumes at driveways ..................................21 Exhibit 16. Existing with project peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 1-4 ..........................22 Exhibit 17. Existing with project peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 5-8 ..........................23 Exhibit 18. Existing with project peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 9-11 ........................23 Exhibit 19. Existing with project conditions peak hour levels of service and project impact .......25 Exhibit 20. Impact of proposed mitigation measures .................................................................27 Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 1 1. Introduction
GTS has prepared the following traffic impact study for the Redlands Marketplace project in Redlands, CA. The purpose of this study is to assess the potential impacts of the Redlands Marketplace project on traffic operations per the City’s Guidelines (Measure U). A Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for the purposes of the CEQA document is provided under a separate cover.
a) Description of the proposed project
The project (Redlands Marketplace) proposes to construct a new shopping center with a 36,000 SF grocery store, four multi-tenant pad buildings (total area of 31,500 SF), and one drive-through restaurant (2,700 SF) on an approximately 14.5-acre site.

The project site is located at the northeast corner of West Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street (APN: 0167-171-16-0000) within the Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan.

The project site plan is attached as Exhibit 1. The location within the City of Redlands is shown in Exhibit 2.
b) Scope of analysis
The scope of this study is based on the City of Redlands traffic study requirements, including Measure U, the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines, and in accordance with the San Bernardino County Association of Governments (SANBAG) Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements. The scoping memorandum is presented in Appendix A.

The following two traffic assessments are evaluated for the proposed project:

1. A Level of Service (LOS) analysis for compliance with the City’s Measure U requirements

2. A Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) presented under a separate cover Study area
The following is a list of the study intersections which are shown in Exhibit 3.

1. W Lugonia Ave & Tennessee St

2. W Lugonia Ave & Home Depot (HD) Parking Lot

3. W Lugonia Ave & New York St

4. W Lugonia Ave & Texas St

5. E Lugonia Ave (SR 38) & Orange St (State facility)

6. San Bernardino Ave & Texas St

7. San Bernardino Ave & Tennessee St (State facility)

8. San Bernardino Ave & Citrus Plaza Dr (State facility)

9. W Lugonia Ave & Citrus Plaza Dr

10. I-10 WB Ramps & Tennessee St (State facility)

11. I-10 EB Ramps & Tennessee St (State facility)
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 2 The project driveways are also included in the analysis and labeled as:

D1. W Lugonia Ave & Project Driveway 1 (Easternmost) – unsignalized D2. W Lugonia Ave & Project Driveway 2 – signalized
D3. Tennessee St & Project Driveway 3 - unsignalized
D4. Tennessee St & Project Driveway 4 (Northernmost) - unsignalized The intersection analysis for the traffic study is accomplished using Synchro software program.

Level of Service (LOS) standards for the traffic study are in accordance with Measure U in the City of Redlands.

Analysis scenarios
Per the requirements of Measure U, this study includes an evaluation of the following analysis scenarios for weekday AM and PM peak hours conditions:
 Existing Conditions
 Existing Conditions Plus Project
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 3 Exhibit 1. Site plan (source: City of Redlands)
0 .,,
;u
m
m
== ,.
-<
I
- ~ ... w
ZONING:C-3
MAJORA
MARKET
t36,000SF
ZONING: R-3
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 4 Exhibit 2. Location map
...
.
.
.
... .. ·· .
. . .. .. . . . . . .

EAST IGHLANOS
U)
•.• - ......... ,, ..• :!
U)
.,
..
~
:, J~ C
.. " 0 E San Bernardino Ave
. tate Route 38 t
~~ one
Redlands
...
...
'";
SOUTH

REOLA OS
. . ..• , .
•,
.. •··.

Legend
........ Redlands city limits
■ Project site
: ..................... ' .... .
:·'
: ...... .:
. ..

Yucaipa
Regional Park
Yucaipa
.. ~ ......................................................................... ··.· . , Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 5 Exhibit 3. Study intersections
Legend
#
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 6 2. Methodology
This traffic impact analysis is based on the City of Redlands traffic study requirements, including Measure U, the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines, and in accordance with the San Bernardino County Association of Governments (SANBAG) Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements. For state facilities the project also references Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002). It should be noted that Caltrans uses VMT for CEQA review per the Caltrans Traffic Impact Study Guide (2020) and considers level of service (LOS) only for operational and design coordination (not as a CEQA threshold). As noted earlier, VMT analysis is presented under a separate cover.

Level of Service/Operational Analysis Methodology
While VMT is the preferred quantitative metric for assessing potentially significant transportation impacts under CEQA, it should be noted that SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from using metrics such as level of service (LOS) as part of the application of local general plan policies, municipal and zoning codes, conditions of approval, or any other planning requirements through a city’s planning approval process; cities can still ensure adequate operation of the transportation system in terms of transportation congestion measures related to vehicular delay and roadway capacity.

The study intersections (all signalized) are analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology. This method measures the delay in seconds per vehicle at an intersection and assigns a numerical value called delay-per-vehicle (measured in seconds/vehicle) and a corresponding letter value to the intersection.

The degree of congestion at an intersection is described by the level of service, which ranges from LOS A to LOS F, with LOS A representing free-flow conditions with little delay and LOS F representing over-saturated traffic flow throughout the peak hour. The level of service criteria for signalized intersections are shown in Exhibit 4 below.

Exhibit 4. Level of service criteria for signalized intersections Level of Service
Average Control Delay
(seconds/vehicle) General Description
A 10 Free Flow
B >10 – 20 Stable Flow (slight delays)
C >20 – 35 Stable flow (acceptable delays)
D >35 – 55 Approaching unstable flow (tolerable delay, occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding)
E >55 – 80 Unstable flow (intolerable delay)
F
1 >80 Forced flow (congested and queues fail to clear)
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022.

1. If the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio for a lane group exceeds 1.0 LOS F is assigned to the individual lane group. LOS for overall approach or intersection is determined solely by the control delay.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 7 Transportation effects
The City of Redlands General Plan and Measure U Section 1A.60 Principle Six has established the minimum acceptable Level of Service (C or better) for roadway segment and peak hour intersection operations. Where the current Level of Service is lower than C, roadway improvements shall be provided such that the LOS is not reduced below the LOS at the time of the application, or as provided in Section 5.20 of the Redlands General Plan where a more intense Level of Service is specifically permitted, for Existing Plus Project conditions.

For study intersections within the City of Redlands, a project’s traffic impact requires mitigation if the addition of project-generated trips is forecast to cause a degradation to Level of Service D, E, or F at a study intersection. For project impacts at facilities with existing acceptable Level of Service (C or better), the project shall provide improvements that would, at a minimum, provide Level of Service C or better. For project impacts at facilities with existing unacceptable Level of Service (D, E, or F), the project shall provide improvements that would, at a minimum, provide Level of Service that is equal to or better than existing conditions.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 8 3. Existing Conditions
This section describes the existing transportation settings in the project study area. a) Existing roadway system
Regional access to the project site is provided by Interstate 10 and State Route 210. Local circulation is provided by Lugonia Avenue, Citrus Plaza Drive, Tennessee Street, New York Street, Texas Street, Orange Street, and San Bernardino Avenue.

Interstate 10 (I-10) is a major east-west freeway corridor that runs through the City of Redlands.

In the project vicinity, I-10 is an eight-lane freeway (four lanes in each direction), with additional auxiliary and merge lanes near interchanges. The nearest interchange to the study area is the I10/Tennessee Street interchange, which offers full access (on- and off-ramps) in both directions and serves as a key access point for local and regional traffic.

State Route 210 (SR 210), also known as the Foothill Freeway, is a limited-access freeway that runs to the west of the project site. In the vicinity of the project, SR 210 terminates at its system interchange with I-10. .

Lugonia Avenue is an east–west principal arterial that runs through northern Redlands and is designated as State Route 38 east of Orange Street. In the vicinity of the project, Lugonia Avenue is a multi-lane facility with dedicated turn lanes and signalized intersections. It carries moderate to heavy traffic volumes and provides direct access to commercial centers such as Citrus Plaza and Mountain Grove.

Citrus Plaza Drive is a local collector road that provides access to the Citrus Plaza and Mountain Grove shopping centers from San Bernardino Avenue and Lugonia Avenue. It intersects with San Bernardino Avenue at a signalized intersection and serves high volumes of retail-generated traffic.

The roadway is two to three lanes wide, depending on the segment, and is designed to accommodate substantial turning movements into and out of adjacent commercial properties.

Tennessee Street is a local north–south collector that connects I-10 to the north Redlands area, including Lugonia Avenue and San Bernardino Avenue. It features two to three lanes in each direction, depending on the segment, with signalized intersections at key cross streets.

Tennessee Street is a key route for both commuter and commercial traffic and serves as a connector to residential neighborhoods and shopping destinations.

New York Street is a major collector south of Lugonia Avenue, providing local access to adjacent businesses and service centers. In the vicinity of the project, New York Street is one lane in each direction.

Texas Street is a north–south minor arterial located east of the project site. It intersects with Lugonia Avenue and extends north toward residential neighborhoods, providing a connection to San Bernardino Avenue. To the south, Texas Street continues toward I-10, where it passes beneath the freeway as part of a grade-separated interchange.

Orange Street is a north–south principal arterial located further west of Texas Street. It connects north with San Bernardino Avenue and south with I-10. In the vicinity of the project, Orange Street Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 9 is two to three lanes wide in each direction. Between I-10 and Lugonia Ave, Orange Street is SR

38. San Bernardino Avenue is an east–west minor arterial located north of the project site. It runs parallel to Lugonia Avenue and connects to SR 210 at the intersections with Tennessee Street and Citrus Plaza Drive through on- and off-ramps. In the vicinity of the project, San Bernardino Ave is two to four lanes wide in each direction and includes signalized intersections at Tennessee Street and Citrus Plaza Drive.
b) Public transit and active transportation
Public transit. OmniTrans Route 15 serves Redlands in the vicinity of the project with bus stops on Lugonia Avenue and San Bernardino Avenue. Metrolink’s San Bernardino Line runs approximately 0.7 miles south of the project site. The closest rail station to the site is the Redlands-ESRI station, 1.1 miles away.

Bicycle network. According to the Redlands Sustainable Mobility Plan (2021), the area in the vicinity of the project site features existing designated class II bike lane on W San Bernardino Avenue to the east of Texas St, a planned designated class II bike lane on W San Bernardino Avenue to the west of Texas St, an existing designated class III bike route on W Pennsylvania Ave, and a planned designated class III bike route on Texas Street. However, the project area currently lacks bicycle parking.

Pedestrian facilities. In the vicinity of the project site, W Lugonia Avenue features sidewalks 5- ft wide on the south side of the roadway. Sidewalks along the north side of the roadway are intermittent and overgrown and/or blocked by utility poles in some places. There are larger concrete pads, ADA ramps, and crosswalks at the intersection of W Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street. No pedestrian crossing signs or crosswalks are provided at the intersections of W Lugonia Avenue and Home Depot parking lot and W Lugonia Avenue and New York Street.

There is currently no pedestrian infrastructure on Tennessee Street. c) Existing traƯic volumes
Existing weekday AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes were collected on Wednesday May 28, 2025, at the aforementioned intersections 1-11 shown in Exhibit 3. It should be noted that the day of the data collection was a typical clear day during which school was in session.

The existing volumes are shown in Exhibits 5-7. The raw traffic count data including passenger car equivalent (PCE) adjustments are provided in Appendix B.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 10 Exhibit 5. Existing peak hour traffic volumes (Intersections 1-4) .--
c
..,
0 ::,
;;;·
)>
< ,.
:iE
.--
C
..,
0 ::,
;;;·
)>
< ,.

Intersection 1
23 (76) j
230 (793) -+
167 (432)
Tennessee St
...... L+
+-, r
122 (138}
t- 376 (372)
f 99 (86)
Intersection 3
New York St
1 (O) '::)
t- 548 (412)
307 (1024) -+ f 45 (27)
83 (226)
+-, r
00 "' ID w -;::; U1 ....
~ 3
Intersection 2
.--
~ 0
::,
;;;· 280(1069) -+
~ 82 (97)
HD Parking Lot
+-, r
.... V1 .... w
oo oo .:::!. ..
t- 533 (528)
27 (39)
C. 0(1)
Intersection 4
.--
c
..,
0 ::,
;;;·
)>
,.
<
27 (61) j
231 (818) -+
52 (121)
Texas Ave
"' -..., V1"' .,."' a
~;;N
.... ID .... -.:::!-
...... L+
+-, r
13 (24)
t- 447 (299)
131 (65)
Legend
#
x(x)
A Project site
Study intersections
A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 11 Exhibit 6. Existing peak hour traffic volumes (Intersections 5-8) Intersection 5
Orange St
.b ~ .....
cn ex,~
-- .... V1 w ....
.::! ~.s
.....i 4 V,
QJ
,.., ::,
.-- 156 (69) a,
...

C: ~
40(48) j +- 517 (293) ::, 0 QJ ::,
.;· a. 196 (676) -+ r 137 (74) )> 5·
< 47 (133) C. 1 (3) 0
"' )>
< +-, r "'
N w .... V1 w .... ....,
V\W 00 ID J:,, ID
- .s -
Intersection 7
Tennessee St
.... N ,._.,._.a
...., 00 ....,
~ "j:J,:J a ,._. en
~ - .8.

V, .....i 4 V,
OJ OJ ::, ::,
a, 345 (199) a,
"' "' 3 189 (589) j +- 503 (317) 3 QJ QJ
a. 445 (610) -+ r 34 (36) a.
5· 5· 0 132 (180) C. 0(1) 0
)> )>
< < "' +-, r "'
w w a N w en .... -;;:; "i: ,::; ID ID en -$-
Intersection 6
Texas St
~ ~ en
~ "'° 0
-~w
V1 J:,, N
.s ~ -
.....i 4
111 (55) j +-
308 (632) -+ r
23 (64)
+-, r
.... J:,, V1 N
N 00 en
~-;::-u,
V1 .,,, V1
- .,,, -
Intersection 8
Citrus Plaza Dr
.,,, w.,,, W N 0 N 00 W
tJ ~ w w 00 a
~~~
.....i 4
1 (3) ':>
60 (58) j +-
328 (741) -+ r
26 (104)
{h-, r
w a 00 V1 ....,
- -;;:; w w .t:. CX) ..... w -- .,,,
184 (34)
546 (335)
49 (30)
296 (130)
303 (230)
51 (112)
Legend
#
x(x)
A Project site
Study intersections
A.M . (P.M .) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 12 Exhibit 7. Existing peak hour traffic volumes (Intersections 9-11) Intersection 9
Citrus Plaza Dr
+J 4
~ ,....

C
1 .., 15 (80) +- 0
::,
192 (697) f ;;;· -. )>
< 0 (1) C. "'
.., r+
Intersection 11
Tennessee St
4 ....
0 m
a, 128 (304) 1 :;o
0, 195 (369) -. 3
"O 382 (423) "'
r+
93 (239) ....
0 408 (389) ~ a,
10 (33) "' 0,
1 (D) 3
"O
"'
Intersection 10
Tennessee St
+J
114 {186)
+- 3 (5)
f 163 (126)
Legend
#
x(x)
S
Project
tudy in
site
tersections A
A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 13 d) Existing intersection level of service
The study intersection levels of service for existing conditions are shown in Exhibit 8. Detailed level of service worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

As shown in Exhibit 8, the study intersections currently operate within acceptable levels of service (C or better), except for the following intersections:

1. W Lugonia Ave & Tennessee St operating with LOS E during PM peak hour

5. E Lugonia Ave & Orange St: LOS D during AM peak hour

6. San Bernardino Ave & Texas St: LOS D during PM peak hour

7. San Bernardino Ave & Tennessee St: LOS E during AM peak hour and LOS F during PM peak hour

8. San Bernardino Ave & Citrus Plaza Dr: LOS F during both AM and PM peak hours

11. I-10 EB Ramps & Tennessee St: LOS E during PM peak hour Exhibit 8. Existing conditions peak hours levels of service AM Peak PM Peak
Intersection Control Type Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. W Lugonia Ave & Tennessee St Signalized 25.7 C 69.7 E

2. W Lugonia Ave & HD Parking Lot Signalized 16.5 B 19.6 B

3. W Lugonia Ave & New York St Signalized 9.0 A 22.8 C

4. W Lugonia Ave & Texas St Signalized 15.5 B 19.3 B

5. E Lugonia Ave & Orange St Signalized 35.9 D 27.6 C

6. San Bernardino Ave & Texas St Signalized 28.5 C 45.6 D

7. San Bernardino Ave & Tennessee St Signalized 59.9 E 184.6 F

8. San Bernardino Ave & Citrus Plaza Dr Signalized 192.0 F 82.5 F

9. W Lagonia Ave & Citrus Plaza Dr Signalized 8.4 A 10.6 B

10. I-10 WB Ramps & Tennessee St Signalized 28.2 C 30.1 C

11. I-10 EB Ramps & Tennessee St Signalized 22.4 C 60.2 E Delay is reported in seconds per vehicle
LOS = Level of Service
Unacceptable LOS according to Measure U of the City of Redlands are highlighted in gray Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 14 4. Project Trip Forecasts
This section describes how project trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment volumes were developed.
a) Project trip generation
Trip generation calculations use the trip generation rates of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11th Edition (2021) for Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (Land Use Code 937) and Shopping Plaza (40k-150k square feet) (Land Use Code 821).

While no pass-by rates for Land Use Code 937 were reported in the TGM, the rates for LUC 934 (Fast Food Restaurant) were used as a proxy, i.e., 50% in the AM peak hour and 55% in the PM peak hour with the daily pass-by rate assumed as 50% (the lower of the two). The pass-by rates for LUC 810 are 40% for the PM peak, with the conservative 5% rate assumed for the daily and AM peak periods.

Exhibit 9 summarizes the estimated trip generation for the project site on a typical weekday during the AM peak and PM peak hours for the peak hour. As shown, the project is expected to generate 4,547 daily trips, 259 AM peak hour trips, and 413 PM peak hour trips.

Exhibit 9. Project trip generation
Land Use
Land
Use
Code
Units Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates1

Coffee/Donut Shop with
Drive-Through Window 937 TSF 533.57 43.80 42.08 85.88 19.50 19.50 38.99 Shopping Plaza (40 to
150k) 821 TSF 94.49 2.19 1.34 3.53 4.33 4.70 9.03
Trip Generation

Coffee/Donut Shop with DriveThrough Window 2,700 1,441 118 114 232 53 53 105 Shopping Plaza (40 to 150k) 67,500 6,378 148 91 238 293 317 610 Pass-By Trips

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window2 720 59 57 116 29 29 58 Shopping Plaza (40 to 150k)3 319 7 5 12 117 127 244
Net New Trips 6,779 199 143 342 199 214 413
1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11th Edition, 2021 per the identified Land Use Category (LUC).
2 No Pass-By rates for LUC 937; Pass-By rates for LUC 934 were used conservatively rather than LUC 938; 50% in AM Peak and 55% in PM Peak. Daily is assumed 50% (lower of both). 3 Average pass-by rate for LUC 821 Weekday PM Peak Period (40%); a conservative (5%) rate is assumed for Daily and AM Peak Period.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 15 b) Project trip distribution & assignment
The distribution of project trips onto surrounding streets, shown in Exhibit 10, was determined based on highway access and potential travel patterns in consultation with the City.

Exhibit 10. Trip distribution
Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project-generated AM peak hour and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibits 11-14. < Ave
San Bernardino Ave
Ave
a Ave
Pluml..n \j\
..._{.i' Orange
EVADA
Is Blvd W Redlands Blvd
i
!,!}
W Pioneel r,..~e
210
5%
San Bernardino Ave 8
10o/£n : -~Groi,,eDr ~ i ~'-~ ., C:
~ ~ !a'
s
10%
W Lugonia Ave • la
I W Pioneer Ave
5% 1; ~ [ fG;...,
.,(I) "'<,,
t
ldwinAve
5%
W Pioneer Ave
Dahroa Ave
7 W San Bernardino Ave SU N6, I ST W San Bernardino Ave ~ 5o/f ~ ~5% ~ ~ t '-"' {!!. !,!}
15%
W Pennsylvania Ave
..

O>
C:
e
0 Iii
Iii ~ ! !I
Iii
Ruby Ave! 15%
LUGONIA Hd~~
• la 4
30% ~ ~ I 5%
W Lugonia Ave
WWesremAve
W Brockton Ave
Iii iii
i; Iii .. Iii WUnlonAve .. C: Iii :iS ~ O>
0 C:
lndu~\ Parle Ave
~ 70%
! 8 E e Iii :2 g -2 ~ Iii .. £ 8 i5" 0 .. ~ ill !,!} .. 0 3: !,!} :,: ~
WRedlanctsa
'Iva
15% z
t
-< 0
~
~ D <9 .,
WColtonAve
• • !e
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 16 Exhibit 11. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at driveways D1
Project Driveway 1 (Eastern most)
22 (30)
34 (44)
D3
Tennessee St
__, "'
-;::;--"' ... w -~ ~ 0
;;;·
!+
~ L+ ~ 0 <" ,;· 20(37) .. !+ :E
!11 ~ ... .. <" 7 (14) 2
:E ~ !11 ~ w .. r :,
3 0
.,, .,, i!.
-;;-;:;
~~
D2
Proj ect Driveway 2
.-J L+
J +-
D4
Tennessee St
"' "'
WW "' "'
~~
L+
r
r
"' .,, 0
w -;::;-
:::!.~
22 (30)
5 (10)
77 (67)
7 (14)
Legend
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A
A.M. (P. M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 17 Exhibit 12. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 1-4 (Note: Intersection 2 is D2)
,-
c
"" 0
::,
.;·
)>
< "'
,-
c
"" 0
::,
.;·
)>
< "'
15 (20)
33 (64)
Intersection 1
Tennessee St
t-
-+ f
Intersection 3
New York St
t-
-+
~
.--
C
11 (21) ..,
0 14 (26) ::,
.;·
)>
< "'
~
.--
C
44 (60) ..,
0 ::,
.;· 28 (54) )>
< 6 (11) "'
Intersection 2
Proj ect Driveway 2
See D2
HO Parki ng Lot
Intersection 4
Texas Ave
t-
-+
...,
Legend
36(50)
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A
A.M. (P.M .) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 18 Exhibit 13. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 5-8 ...,
.---
c
..,
0 ~
.;·
)>
,.
<
V,
~
CD
,.
;
QI

0.. 5·
0 )>
,.
<
6 (11)
16 {32}
6(11)
22 (30}
Intersection 5
Orange St
1 +-
..,
Intersection 7
Tennessee St
+-
--+
.., r+
22 {30}
22 (30)
V,
QI
~
CD
,.
;
QI

0..
5·
0 )>
,.
<
V,
QI
~
CD
~
~
QI

0..
5·
0 )>
,.
<
6(11)
6(11)
6(11)
7 (10)
Intersection 6
Texas St
.-J
1 +-
--+
..,
Intersection 8
Citrus Pl aza Dr
+-
--+ r
r+
7 (10)
6(11)
11 (21)
Legend
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A
A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 19 Exhibit 14. Project-generated peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 9-11 Intersection 9
Citrus P,laza Dr
~
~
C
"" +- 11 (21) 0
::,
.;· 15 (20) -+ )>
,.
<
Intersection 11
Tennessee St
L+
15 (20) j
Intersection 10
Tennessee St
.,_J
T
~
a 15 (20)
~ a,
;;o
QI
3 "C
"'
Legend
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A
A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 20 5. Existing Plus Project Conditions
This section presents the volume forecasts and the level of service at the study intersections under the Existing Plus Project conditions.
a) Existing plus project volume forecasts
The Existing Plus Project volume forecast was developed by adding project-generated trips to the Existing volumes. Existing Plus Project AM and PM peak hours intersection turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibits 15-18.
b) Existing plus project intersection level of service
Detailed intersection level of service calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

The study intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project conditions are shown in Exhibit 19 and queue lengths are reported in Appendix C.

The project is forecasted to degrade the level of service from the current LOS grade (under existing conditions) to a lower grade at the following intersections:

2. W Lugonia Ave & HD Parking Lot (LOS degraded from C to F at the PM peak hour)

4. W Lugonia Ave & Texas St (LOS degraded from B to E at the PM peak hour) No instances of queues changing by more than one vehicle were observed at Caltrans facilities.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 21 Exhibit 15. Existing with project peak hours traffic volumes at driveways D1
Project Driveway 1 (Eastern most)
,-
c:
"" 0
:J
~- 280(1069) -+
~
..,
_g_
a
S;'
:.:·
"
~
~
w
+J
D3
Tennessee St
w "' "' "' .::- w
::::! ~
4 r-+
"' "' ID U1
- ~ w w 00 - !:::
22 (30)
+- 592 (472)
20(37)
7 (14)
:E
,-
C:
"" 34 (44) 0
:J
~- 280 (1069) )>
< 82 (97)
"
..,
0 ;;;·
~
S;'
:.:·
"
~
~ :,
z
~ ::r
!!:
:J
3 0
.a
D2
Proj ect Driveway 2
+J 4
1 -+
1 +-, r-+
D4
Tennessee St
U1 "' ..... "' WW ~
4 r-+
"' ..... ID
-
"'
:, ~ w 0 -
~
22 (30)
+- 538 (538)
27 (39)
C. 0(1)
77 (67)
7 (14)
Legend
~ A Project site
# Study intersections
Project driveways
x(x) A. M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 22 Exhibit 16. Existing with project peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 1-4 (Note: Intersection 2 is D2)
Intersection 1
,....

C
~ 23 (76) j ::,
;;;· 245 (813) ~
r 167 (432 )
Tennessee St
._J L+
...., r
.... .., .... "'-' VI 0 "' "' .., .., w w --., "' 0
!:! .s .e
122 (138)
+- 387 (393)
f 113 (112)
Intersection 3
New York St
~ ,.... 1 (O) '::)
~ +- 592 (472) 0
::,
;;;· 340(1088) ~ 45 (27) )>
< 83 (226) ,. ...., r
00 .., "' w ;=-
--., vi
~ .3.
,....

C
..,
0 ::,
aj'.
~
,....

C
..,
0 ::,
;;;·
)>
< ,.

Intersection 2
Proj ect Driveway 2
See D2
HD Parking Lot
Intersection 4
Texas Ave
.., VI en "'-' --., .,_ a
"'j;;-;::; N .... "' .... -.:::!..-
27 (61) j
13 (24)
+- 483 (349)
259 (872) ~ f 131 (65)
58 (132)
...., r
Legend
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A
A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 23 Exhibit 17. Existing with project peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 5-8 Exhibit 18. Existing with project peak hour traffic volumes at intersections 9-11 Intersection 5
Orange St

1./'1 ~...., l>J 00 ~ -- .... a, w ....
.::! ~ .e
.-J L+ V,
., ,.., ::,
,- 156(69) C: ""
~ "" 46 (59} j +- 539 (323) ::, 0 ., ::,
.;· a. 212 (708) -+ 137 (74) )> ;;·
< 53 (144} C. 1 (3) 0 ,. )>
< +-, r ,.
l> "' .... 1./'1 0 .... ....,
a\ W 00 ID l> ID
- .eIntersection 7
Tennessee St
....
.... "'0 "' ...., 1./'1....,
~ w,:::, 0 .... (7\
~ - .e
V, .-J L+ V, ., ., ::, ::,
"" 345 (199) "" ,. ,. ; 189 (589} j +- 525 (347} ; ~ ., a. 467 (640) -+ 34 (36) a. ;;· ;;· 0 132 (180} C. 0 (1) 0
)> )>
,. < < +-, r ,.
w 1./'1 .... w 0"' 00
0\ V1 vi ,_. O 00
-~-
Intersection 6
Texas St
........ (7\ 1./'1....,
00 ID 0
- ~w a, l> "'
$. ~ -
+-1 L+
117 (66} j +-
314 (643) -+ f
29 (7 5)
+-, r
.... l> 1./'1 "' ID 00 <n
00 -;; vi 1./'1 l> 1./'1 - l>-
Intersection 8
Citrus Plaza Dr
l> w l> W IV 0 IV 00 w
N~W
W 00 O
~~~
+-1 L+
1 (3) ~
60(58) j +-
335 (7 51) -+
26 (104}
fl +-, r

1./'1
0 00 1./'1"'
-NWW .!=.oo....,v, - - l>
184 (34}
553 (345}
49 (30)
29 6 (130)
309 (241} Legend
62 (133)
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A
A.M . (P.M .) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 24 ~ ,...

C
"" 15 (80) 0
~
.;· 207 (717) l>
,.
< 0 (1)
;:;
0 rr,
t0 143 (324) :,;,
QI 195 (369) 3
,, 382 (423) "'
Intersection 9
Citrus Plaza Dr
1 +-
-+ r
C.
+-, r
Intersection 11
1 -+
Tennessee St
-I> ... ... 0
"' 0
vi;:; "' __, 3 ~
4 93 (239) ,:.
0 419 (410) ~ t0
10 (33} :,;,
QI
1 (0 } 3
~
Intersection 10
Tennessee St
.-J
129 (206)
+- 3 (5)
r 163 (1261
+-,
Legend
#
x(x)
Project site
Study intersections
Project driveways
A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Volumes
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 25 Exhibit 19. Existing with project conditions peak hour levels of service and project impact Existing Conditions Existing + Project Conditions Project Impact Intersection Control
Type
AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Increase in
Delay
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS AM PM

1. W Lugonia & Tennessee Signalized 25.7 C 69.7 E 26.2 C 71.3 E 0.5 1.6

2. W Lugonia & HD
Parking Lot (D2) Signalized 16.5 B 19.6 B 22.8 C 92.2 F 6.3 *72.6

3. W Lugonia & New York Signalized 9.0 A 22.8 C 9.0 A 22.4 C 0.0 -0.4

4. W Lugonia & Texas Signalized 15.5 B 19.3 B 15.7 B 65.2 E 0.2 *45.9

5. E Lugonia & Orange Signalized 35.9 D 27.6 C 39.5 D 29.3 C 3.6 1.7

6. San Bernardino & Texas Signalized 28.5 C 45.6 D 30.0 C 51.6 D 1.5 6.0

7. San Bernardino &
Tennessee Signalized 59.9 E 184.6 F 62.2 E 182.9 F 2.3 -1.7

8. San Bernardino & Citrus
Plaza Signalized 192.0 F 82.5 F 189.4 F 83.5 F -2.6 1.0

9. W Lagonia & Citrus
Plaza Signalized 8.4 A 10.6 B 8.4 A 10.7 B 0.0 0.1

10. I-10 WB Ramps &
Tennessee Signalized 28.2 C 30.1 C 27.7 C 30.6 C -0.5 0.5

11. I-10 EB Ramps &
Tennessee Signalized 22.4 C 60.2 E 23.7 C 66.8 E 1.3 6.6 D1. W Lugonia & Dwy 1 Unsignalized -- -- -- -- 0.1 A 0.1 A -- -- D3. Dwy 3 & Tennessee Unsignalized -- -- -- -- 8.6 A 19.9 C -- -- D4. Dwy 4 & Tennessee Unsignalized -- -- -- -- 8.8 A 10.5 B -- --

Delay is reported in seconds per vehicle
LOS = Level of Service
Unacceptable LOS according to Measure U of the City of Redlands are highlighted in gray * indicates that project contributions degrade the level of service from the current LOS grade (under existing conditions) to a lower grade.

The corresponding intersection is marked in Bold.
-- indicates future intersection.

I
I
I
I
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 26 6. Site Access
The site will be accessed by four driveways, which are shown in the diagrams and maps in Sections 4 and 5 and are described as follows:

Driveway 1, at the southeast corner of the site, will provide right-in/right-out access from/to Lugonia Avenue.

Driveway 2, on the south edge of the site, will provide access from/to eastbound and westbound Lugonia Avenue and direct access from/to Home Depot.

Driveway 3, on the west edge of the site, will provide access from/to northbound and southbound Tennessee Street.

Driveway 4, at the northwest corner of the site, will provide access from/to northbound and southbound Tennessee Street.

Pedestrian access to the site will be facilitated by a network of walkways and crosswalks as shown in the site plan.

As shown in Exhibit 19, the driveways operate at an acceptable LOS (A, B, C).

7. On-site Circulation
On-site circulation will be provided by interconnected driveways and pedestrian walkways and crosswalks as shown in the site plan. No issues with on-site circulation were identified in this analysis.

8. Queuing Analysis
Queuing analysis was carried out for the drive-through lane based on the methodology provided in The Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) Manual of Policies & Procedures (MPP) Section 321 Appendix B1. This methodology aims to determine the queue length necessary to service traffic intensity based on random arrivals (Poisson distribution) and it is consistent with Transportation Research Board Report 165 Traffic Flow Theory, Chapter 8 Queuing Models2. Traffic intensity is calculated as the ratio of peak hour arrival rate to typical service rate.

In this analysis, the following rates are assumed based on studies3 previously conducted for proposed coffee shops (Starbucks) in the City of Whittier in LA county:
 Service utilization rate = 57% of AM peak hour inbound trips or 60% of PM peak hour inbound trips
 Average service rate = 90 vehicles per hour (vph)
1 Traffic Study Policies and Procedures, LADOT (June 2013) 2 Traffic Flow Theory, A Monograph (Gerlough and Huber, 1975) 3 Prepared by LLG Engineers and Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 27 The peak hour arrival rate (average number of vehicles expected to utilize the proposed drivethrough lane) is determined based on the service utilization rate applied to unadjusted peak hour inbound trip generation.

As shown in Exhibit 9 (project generated trips based on ITE trip generation rates), the proposed Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window is expected to generate 118 AM and 53 PM unadjusted inbound peak hour trips. Applying the assumed service utilization rates results in 68 AM vph (118 x 0.57 = 67.25) and 32 PM vph (53 x 0.6 =31.8) expected to use the drive-through window. Based on the assumed service rate of 90 vph and the conservative AM service utilization, the expected traffic intensity for the proposed Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window is 0.76 (68vph/90vph). Based on LADOT MPP Section 321 Appendix B, the 99thpercentile queue would be approximately 7 vehicles. Therefore, the proposed 14 queue spaces for the drive-through lane would adequately satisfy the anticipated queue, based on service utilization and average service rates following the LADOT methodology of the queuing analysis.

9. Mitigations
The following mitigations measures are suggested at the intersections where the project contributed to degrading the level of service from the current LOS grade (under existing conditions) to a lower grade (Exhibit 20):
 2. W Lugonia Ave & HD Parking Lot
Increasing the cycle length to 100 sec and optimizing the splits lead to an improvement in the level of service to LOS C at the PM peak hour with a reduction in delays to 33 sec.  4. W Lugonia Ave & Texas St
Changing lanes configuration of the NB approach (one NB left turn lane with a storage length of 40 ft and one NB through and right turn lane) leads to an improvement in the level of service to LOS C at the PM peak hour with a reduction in delays to 21.2 sec.

Exhibit 20. Impact of proposed mitigation measures
The Development Impact Fees (DIF) will be used to implement the mitigation measures as well as other improvements deemed necessary.

Existing + Project Existing + Project
With Mitigations
Intersection Control
Type
Peak
Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS

2. W Lugonia & HD
Parking Lot Signalized PM 96.3 F 33.0 C

4. W Lugonia & Texas Signalized PM 66.3 E 21.2 C

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 28 10. Equitable Access and Caltrans Encroachment Permit To ensure equitable access, it should be noted that if any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, they must comply with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards upon project completion. Additionally, the project must ensure the maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the construction phase. These access considerations align with Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.

Finally, any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ Right-ofWay (R/W) requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit.

Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 29 Appendices
Appendix A: Scoping Memorandum
Appendix B: Count Data
Appendix C: Synchro Analysis
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 Appendix A: Scoping Memorandum

1 t +1 213 267 2332 | f +1 213 318 0744
[email protected] | www.gentecsol.com
11900 W Olympic Blvd #450, Los Angeles, CA 90064
GTS | General Technologies and Solutions

SCOPING MEMORANDUM
Date: May 20, 2025 GTS: 250412
To: City of Redlands (Attention of Mr. Don Young)
From: GTS
cc: Chambers Group
Subject: Traffic Impact Study Scoping and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Project: Redlands Marketplace
GTS is pleased to present the Traffic Impact Study Scoping and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening memorandum for the purposes of conducting a traffic analysis of the above-mentioned project in the City of Redlands.

This memorandum consists of project description, level of service analysis scoping (trip generation, trip distribution and assignment, and study area) as well as the VMT screening.

We seek your review and confirmation on behalf of the City to proceed with the traffic impact study.

BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project (Redlands Marketplace) proposes to construct a new shopping center with 36,000 SF grocery store, four multi-tenant pad buildings (total area of 31,500 SF), and one drive-through restaurant (2,700 SF) on an approximately 14.5-acre site.

The project site is located at the northeast corner of West Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street (APN:
0167-171-16-0000) within the Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan.

The project site plan is attached as Exhibit 1. The location within the City of Redlands is shown in Exhibit

2. SCOPE OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY
This scope is based on the City of Redlands traffic study requirements, including Measure U, the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines and in accordance with the San Bernardino County Association of Governments (SANBAG) Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements.

The following two traffic assessments will be evaluated for the proposed project:

1. A Level of Service (LOS) analysis for compliance with the City’s Measure U requirements

2. A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for compliance with the requirements of the California Enviromental Quality Act (CEQA)
2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and the perception of those conditions by motorists and passengers. LOS is typically graded from A to F with A representing free-flow and F representing significant congestion and delays.

The City of Redlands Measure U establishes minimum Level of Service standards, which require that City intersections be maintained at LOS C or better during the morning and evening peak hours.

Traffic effects at an intersection are considered to be significant if the addition of project traffic causes an intersection to operate deficiently (LOS D, E, or F). According to Measure U, “any location where the level of service is below LOS C at the time an application is submitted, mitigation shall be imposed on that development project to assure, at a minimum, that the level of traffic service is maintained at levels of service that are no worse than those existing at the time of application for development is filed, except as provided in Section 5.20b.” (Source: City of Redlands General Plan 2035) New development is required to offset effects where the project results in a significant effect according to the City of Redland’s Measure U requirements. The Level of Service with project must be improved to offset the project’s effect.

Trip Generation
Trip generation calculations use the trip generation rates of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11th Edition (2021) for Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (Land Use Code 937) and Shopping Plaza (40k-150k square feet) (Land Use Code 821).

While no pass-by rates for Land Use Code 937 were reported in the TGM, the rates for LUC 934 (Fast Food Restaurant) were used as a proxy, i.e., 50% in the AM peak hour and 55% in the PM peak hour with the daily pass-by rate assumed as 50% (the lower of the two). The pass-by rates for LUC 810 are 40% for the PM peak, with the same rate assumed for the daily and AM peak periods.

Table 1 summarizes the estimated trip generation for the project site on a typical weekday during the AM peak and PM peak hours for the peak hour. As shown, the project is expected to generate 4,547 daily trips, 259 AM peak hour trips, and 413 PM peak hour trips. 3 Table 1: Project Trip Generation
Land Use
Land
Use
Code
Units Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates1

Coffee/Donut Shop with
Drive-Through Window 937 TSF 533.57 43.80 42.08 85.88 19.50 19.50 38.99 Shopping Plaza (40 to
150k) 821 TSF 94.49 2.19 1.34 3.53 4.33 4.70 9.03
Trip Generation

Coffee/Donut Shop with DriveThrough Window 2,700 1,441 118 114 232 53 53 105 Shopping Plaza (40 to 150k) 67,500 6,378 148 91 238 293 317 610 Pass-By Trips

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window2 720 59 57 116 29 29 58 Shopping Plaza (40 to 150k)3 2,551 59 36 95 117 127 244 Net New Trips 4,547 148 111 259 199 214 413
1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11th Edition, 2021 per the identified Land Use Category (LUC).
2 No Pass-By rates for LUC 937; Pass-By rates for LUC 934 were used conservatively rather than LUC 938; 50% in AM Peak and 55% in PM Peak. Daily is assumed 50% (lower of both). 3 Average pass-by rate for LUC 821 Weekday PM Peak Period (40%); same rate (40%) is assumed for Daily and AM Peak Period.

Trip Distribution
The distribution of project trips onto surrounding streets, shown in Exhibit 3, was determined based on highway access and potential travel patterns.

Study Area and Assumptions
The following is a list of study intersections to be included in the study, as shown in Exhibit 3.

Intersections:

1. Lugonia Avenue at Tennessee Street

2. Lugonia Avenue at Eastern Project Driveway (A)

3. Lugonia Avenue at New York Street

4. Lugonia Avenue at Texas Street

5. Lugonia Avenue at Orange Street

6. San Bernardino Ave at Texas Street

7. San Bernardino Ave at Tennessee Street

8. San Bernardino Ave at Citrus Plaza Drive

9. Lagonia Avenue at Citrus Plaza Drive

10. I-10 EB Ramps at Tennessee Street
4 11. I-10 EB Ramps at Tennessee Street
The study intersections will be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology. The intersection analysis for the traffic study will be accomplished using Synchro or Vistro software program.

Level of Service (LOS) standards for the traffic study will be in accordance with Measure U in the City of Redlands.

Study Scenarios
Per the requirements of Measure U the following two scenarios will be analyzed • Existing Conditions
• Existing Conditions Plus Project
Special Considerations
The traffic study will also include an evaluation of site access, on-site circulation, queuing for the drive through lane, and truck turning templates.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SCREENING ANALYSIS
Background
On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for use. Among the changes to the guidelines was removal of vehicle delay and level of service from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled (VMT).

VMT Screening Analysis
The “City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines” provide details on screening thresholds that can be used to identify when a proposed land use project is anticipated to result in a less-thansignificant impact without conducting a more detailed level analysis. Screening thresholds follow three steps:

1. Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening

2. Low VMT Area Screening

3. Project Type Screening

1. Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
Projects located within a TPA may be presumed to have a less-than-significant impact. A TPA is defined as a half-mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor. ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and evening peak commute periods. A ‘highquality transit corridor’ means a corridor with a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours.
5 However, this presumption cannot be applied is a project’s floor area ratio (FAR) is less than 0.75 which is the case in the project at hand. Furthermore, the project is not located in a TPA per the SBCTA VMT screening tool Exhibit 4.

The TPA Screening criterion is NOT met.

2. Low VMT Area Screening
Projects located within a low VMT generating area (VMT per worker, 15% below County baseline) may be presumed to have a less-than-significant impact. Based on the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool, the project is located in a Low VMT Area. The results of the SBCTA VMT Screening Tool are provided in Exhibit 4..

The Low VMT Area Screening criterion is met.

3. Project Type Screening
Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT should not be required to complete a VMT assessment. Projects which generate less than 3,000 MT CO2e per year can be presumed to have a less than-significant impact on VMT. Projects which generate less than 3,000 MT CO2e per year include the following:
• Single family residential - 167 dwelling units or fewer • Multi-family (low-rise) – 232 dwelling units or fewer • Multi-family (mid-rise) – 299 dwelling units or fewer • Office – 59,100 SF or less
• Local Serving Retail – 112,400 square feet or less (no stores larger than 50,000 square feet) • Warehousing – 463,600 SF or less
• Light Industrial – 74,600 SF or less
The proposed retail project is less than 112,400 square feet and is intended to serve the local community.

In addition, per Attachment 1 of the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines, based on the proposed use and estimated daily trips for the project, the proposed project would generate less than 3,000 MT CO2e per year. As a result, the proposed project can be presumed to have a less-thansignificant VMT impact and would meet the Project Type Screening criteria.

The Project Type Screening criterion is met.

Based on review of the VMT screening criteria, the project meets the Project Type screening thresholds.

Therefore, the project would result in a less-than-significant transportation impact, and no additional VMT analysis is required.

List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1. Site plan (Source: City of Redlands) .............................................................................................. 6 Exhibit 2. Location Map (Source: City of Redlands) ...................................................................................... 7 Exhibit 3. Trip Distribution and Study Intersections ..................................................................................... 8 Exhibit 4. SGCTA VMT Screening Analysis ..................................................................................................... 9 6 Exhibit 1. Site plan (Source: City of Redlands)
\· 10fltEEWAY \ .

ZONING:C~

MAJOR A
MARKET
t36,000SF
ZONING: R-1
7 Exhibit 2. Location Map (Source: City of Redlands)
City of Redlands
Tennessee Street Commercial Center
Author: Red lands GIS Date: 3/7/2025
Parcels
APN
8 Exhibit 3. Trip Distribution and Study Intersections
r Ave
San Bernardino Ave
Ave
a Ave
7 Pluml.n U'
'\# Orange
EVADA
Is Blvd W Redlands Blvd
0 ~
"' S!2
W Pionee( l>-"e
5%
San Bernardino Ave 8
ti5
a, ?;;
10o/~
E G>
G> a,
-~Grove Or ~ (/) .D (/) a, G>
< #1> C Mo Q) C
10%
W Lugonia Ave - IJII
ti5
a,
E
a,
.D
a,
<
lndustt'-a\ Parle Ave
WRedlandsa
'11,,d
;!::

Q)
Q"
&l G>
I-
~
210
I W Pioneer Ave
5% Q ~ - 3 ~Q
~ ~ ~t.,, <,,
Dahlia Ave
,,,- vnynna ~, co
0 .!
(!
W Pioneer Ave r-·~ (") ln ii>'
'< ls 5% 0 S!2 5, ::r C:
0 1:

S!2 Cl)
co
3:
7 W San Bernardino Ave SU 6'1ST W San Bernardino Ave
15%
135% j 5o/f ti5 ti5 ti5 - (/) ~5% C' G> (n Cl) C:
0) a,
~ a, Cl) ,._ C f! Cl)
~ a, S!2 a,
.... < ~ 0
W Pennsylvania Ave
ti5
Ruby Ave~
0 15%
LUGONIA Hd~~
- .. 4
30% ~ ~ I 5%
W Lugonia Ave
WWestemAve
W Brockton Ave
ln en
ln W Union Ave G> co 0) ti5 :0 ! C E 0 a, ti5 -0 ::r .... :, D 0 0 ti5 ~ 0 (I> co ..c: a, 0 3: S!2 J::: ~ J: <( z
(I)
~
-< 0
~
fl ~
9 Exhibit 4. SGCTA VMT Screening Analysis
,·, SBCTAVMTScreeningTool Powe,edbyFeh,&Pee,s User'sGu,de 3 ~ :: 8 11 Find address or place CIEi
~ San Bernardino Ave
.:,
~ g - . - . - .
~
Almond Ave
Ci!ltvaryChapelL=~=---- - --.1 Element.lry
and High
School
Mountain
Grove at Citrus
Plaza
Citrus Plaza
• - • - • --'Noll'!J')nta M e • - • - • - • - • - • -.t-1"1..!J'lll"bnta "'e " - • - • Orange Tree Ln
•.\
.... WRedlandsBlvd
lsslon •,
~entarJ\ chool • •
I \
I \
; -i 0.3mi
WJdi·ii-HH·ld•ta
Plumln
W Redlands Blvd
WParkAve
" j
1 I 5
; •
!
8 " ,,
OBJECTID 353
TAZ 53836402
VMTMetric OD VMT Per Service
Population
TAZVMT 23.05
Community 32.07012962
RegionVMT
Threshold 27.3
% Difference ·28.13%
Results Yes (Pass}
Shape_length 10928.326104101825
Shape_Area 7458186.020380972
=
w
WC /..,._
Lugonla
Elementary
School
1 Map Layers ~ x
► L'!'.I Project Area VMT
► m Screening Results
m LowVMT GeneratingTAZs
•m Jurisdiction Boundaries
....
□ TAZ
b
... m Transit Priority Area
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 Appendix B: Count Data
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0,5 0,5 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 12 34 13 6 18 0 3 19 26 21 39 18 209 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 13 40 17 14 21 0 5 37 36 29 66 28 306 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 16 52 12 17 27 0 9 42 28 44 74 27 348 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 30 49 19 20 32 2 4 45 30 22 103 27 383 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 27 65 29 20 20 2 1 44 37 25 99 39 408 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 27 55 14 17 27 1 8 71 52 29 91 27 419 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 40 69 21 11 20 2 4 51 32 18 92 38 398 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 35 49 19 18 25 2 10 64 46 27 94 18 407 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 200 413 144 123 190 9 44 373 287 215 658 222 2,878 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 26% 55% 19% 38% 59% 3% 6% 53% 41% 20% 60% 20% APP/DEPART 757 / 679 322 / 692 704 / 640 1,095 / 867 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 129 238 83 66 92 7 23 230 167 99 376 122 1,632 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 29% 53% 18% 40% 56% 4% 5% 55% 40% 17% 63% 20% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.865 0.917 0.802 0.916 0.974
APP/DEPART 450 / 383 165 / 358 420 / 379 597 / 512 0
4:00 PM 67 84 59 23 22 1 30 180 94 17 92 47 716 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 63 83 71 35 25 1 10 179 122 22 76 32 719 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 67 81 51 25 20 3 13 178 91 19 80 39 667 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 57 86 73 21 30 6 24 172 113 23 100 28 733 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 71 95 64 27 31 7 24 206 94 16 82 45 762 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 81 82 63 27 23 7 16 200 108 25 97 33 762 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 62 79 76 25 22 3 12 215 117 22 93 32 758 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 71 70 57 31 18 1 12 180 80 27 114 28 689 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 539 660 514 214 191 29 141 1,510 819 171 734 284 5,806 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 31% 39% 30% 49% 44% 7% 6% 61% 33% 14% 62% 24% APP/DEPART 1,713 / 1,085 434 / 1,181 2,470 / 2,238 1,189 / 1,302 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 271 342 276 100 106 23 76 793 432 86 372 138 3,015 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 30% 38% 31% 44% 46% 10% 6% 61% 33% 14% 62% 23% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.966 0.881 0.945 0.961 0.989
APP/DEPART 889 / 556 229 / 624 1,301 / 1,169 596 / 666 0 Tennessee St

NORTH LEG
W Lugonia Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH LEG
Tennessee St AM
8:00 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Tennessee St
W Lugonia Ave

U-TURNS
Tennessee St Tennessee St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I I 11-1 _1_1_1
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 2 1 1 1 X 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 11 0 8 0 0 0 0 32 6 4 71 0 132 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 8 0 9 0 0 0 0 47 21 7 115 0 207 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 14 0 7 0 0 0 0 49 22 9 131 0 232 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 13 0 16 0 0 0 0 61 23 5 139 0 257 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 21 0 13 0 0 0 0 78 15 7 142 0 276 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 18 0 14 0 0 0 0 76 26 6 129 0 269 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 65 18 9 123 0 250 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 23 0 11 0 0 0 0 79 20 6 116 0 255 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 133 0 88 0 0 0 0 487 151 53 966 0 1,878 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 60% 0% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 76% 24% 5% 95% 0%
APP/DEPART 221 / 0 0 / 204 638 / 575 1,019 / 1,099 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 77 0 53 0 0 0 0 280 82 27 533 0 1,052 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 59% 0% 41% 0% 0% 0% 0% 77% 23% 5% 95% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.929 0.000 0.887 0.940 0.953
APP/DEPART 130 / 0 0 / 109 362 / 333 560 / 610 0
4:00 PM 24 0 25 0 0 0 0 239 23 7 132 0 450 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 23 0 18 0 0 0 0 258 27 7 107 0 440 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 29 0 18 0 0 0 0 237 17 12 109 0 422 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 18 0 17 0 0 0 0 246 20 10 133 0 444 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 17 0 22 0 0 0 0 267 30 8 126 0 470 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 258 32 6 132 0 474 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 25 0 27 0 0 0 0 285 26 11 123 0 497 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 22 0 12 0 0 0 0 259 9 14 147 0 463 0 0 0 1 1
VOLUMES 181 0 162 0 0 0 0 2,049 184 75 1,009 0 3,661 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 53% 0% 47% 0% 0% 0% 0% 92% 8% 7% 93% 0%
APP/DEPART 343 / 0 0 / 259 2,233 / 2,212 1,085 / 1,190 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 87 0 84 0 0 0 0 1,069 97 39 528 0 1,905 0 0 0 1 APPROACH % 51% 0% 49% 0% 0% 0% 0% 92% 8% 7% 93% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.822 0.000 0.937 0.877 0.958
APP/DEPART 171 / 0 0 / 136 1,166 / 1,154 568 / 615 0
Driveway

NORTH LEG
W Lugonia Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH LEG
Driveway

U-TURNS
Driveway Driveway W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Driveway
W Lugonia Ave AM
7:45 AM PM
5:00 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I I 11-1 _1_1_1
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 3
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0.5 X 0.5 X X X X 2 1 1 1 X 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 37 13 4 73 0 135 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 47 20 7 115 0 204 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 14 14 147 0 234 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 21 0 6 0 0 0 0 74 22 15 141 0 279 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 29 0 7 0 0 0 0 77 24 12 150 0 299 0 0 1 0 1
8:15 AM 16 0 6 0 0 0 0 89 21 6 134 0 272 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 23 0 4 0 0 0 0 67 16 12 123 0 245 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 21 0 13 0 0 0 0 81 35 11 117 0 278 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 144 0 38 0 0 0 0 518 165 81 1,000 0 1,947 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 79% 0% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 76% 24% 7% 93% 0%
APP/DEPART 182 / 0 0 / 246 684 / 556 1,081 / 1,145 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 89 0 23 0 0 0 0 307 83 45 548 0 1,096 0 0 1 0
APPROACH % 79% 0% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 79% 21% 8% 92% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.778 0.000 0.889 0.915 0.913
APP/DEPART 112 / 0 0 / 128 391 / 330 593 / 638 0
4:00 PM 54 0 10 0 0 0 0 242 47 6 102 0 461 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 39 0 13 0 0 0 0 260 54 7 90 0 463 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 50 0 20 0 0 0 0 216 48 6 96 0 436 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 42 0 16 0 0 0 0 252 57 15 105 0 487 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 56 0 14 0 0 0 0 249 54 5 106 0 484 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 38 0 10 0 0 0 0 247 52 5 100 0 452 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 43 0 10 0 0 0 0 276 63 2 101 0 495 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 54 0 11 0 0 0 0 236 47 9 117 0 474 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 376 0 104 0 0 0 0 1,978 422 55 817 0 3,752 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 82% 18% 6% 94% 0%
APP/DEPART 480 / 0 0 / 477 2,400 / 2,082 872 / 1,193 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 179 0 50 0 0 0 0 1,024 226 27 412 0 1,918 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 82% 18% 6% 94% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.818 0.000 0.922 0.915 0.969
APP/DEPART 229 / 0 0 / 253 1,250 / 1,074 439 / 591 0
New York St

NORTH LEG
W Lugonia Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH LEG
New York St

U-TURNS
New York St New York St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
New York St
W Lugonia Ave AM
7:45 AM PM
4:45 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I II.----I -I -I 1----,I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 4
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 4 19 5 1 26 6 2 27 9 14 56 4 173 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 7 29 9 1 40 9 5 32 9 15 109 3 268 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 17 37 11 2 50 14 1 39 3 31 115 3 323 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 11 32 19 4 70 17 4 58 13 38 119 2 387 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 17 44 18 3 59 8 8 62 10 24 126 5 384 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 6 46 13 8 86 17 10 61 16 30 107 4 404 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 16 26 14 5 49 15 5 50 13 39 95 2 329 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 15 27 12 2 48 15 6 65 22 25 93 3 333 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 93 260 101 26 428 101 41 394 95 216 820 26 2,601 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 20% 57% 22% 5% 77% 18% 8% 74% 18% 20% 77% 2% APP/DEPART 454 / 327 555 / 739 530 / 521 1,062 / 1,014 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 50 148 64 20 264 57 27 231 52 131 447 13 1,504 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 19% 56% 24% 6% 77% 17% 9% 75% 17% 22% 76% 2% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.829 0.768 0.891 0.929 0.931
APP/DEPART 262 / 188 341 / 447 310 / 315 591 / 554 0
4:00 PM 14 41 19 6 51 14 12 211 27 23 84 5 507 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 20 59 38 7 53 3 12 201 33 15 63 3 507 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 18 66 26 2 41 7 9 182 29 15 77 3 475 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 18 56 22 6 50 14 19 198 32 18 82 5 520 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 30 67 28 4 53 7 9 204 27 13 78 6 526 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 20 74 25 7 53 10 12 195 30 20 63 7 516 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 18 64 19 4 41 10 21 221 32 14 76 6 526 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 19 62 23 6 50 11 19 177 15 12 84 7 485 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 157 489 200 42 392 76 113 1,589 225 130 607 42 4,062 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 19% 58% 24% 8% 77% 15% 6% 82% 12% 17% 78% 5% APP/DEPART 846 / 644 510 / 747 1,927 / 1,831 779 / 840 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 86 261 94 21 197 41 61 818 121 65 299 24 2,088 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 20% 59% 21% 8% 76% 16% 6% 82% 12% 17% 77% 6% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.882 0.925 0.912 0.924 0.992
APP/DEPART 441 / 346 259 / 383 1,000 / 933 388 / 426 0
Texas St

NORTH LEG
W Lugonia Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH LEG
Texas St AM
7:45 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Texas St
W Lugonia Ave

U-TURNS
Texas St Texas St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I II.----I -I -I 1----,I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 5
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 9 35 16 10 42 6 5 28 8 46 73 14 292 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 8 38 4 7 54 11 7 23 6 38 108 25 329 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 6 49 22 14 77 14 8 26 14 46 126 44 446 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 8 55 11 21 68 13 11 48 16 25 125 35 436 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 8 57 10 22 75 10 8 57 4 39 134 33 457 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 11 50 14 18 78 9 13 65 13 27 132 44 474 0 0 0 1 1 8:30 AM 9 44 13 23 100 13 9 36 10 36 106 28 427 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 10 40 9 20 80 10 7 48 10 23 97 20 374 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 69 368 99 135 574 86 68 331 81 280 901 243 3,236 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 13% 69% 18% 17% 72% 11% 14% 69% 17% 20% 63% 17% APP/DEPART 536 / 679 795 / 935 480 / 566 1,425 / 1,056 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 33 211 57 75 298 46 40 196 47 137 517 156 1,814 0 0 0 1 APPROACH % 11% 70% 19% 18% 71% 11% 14% 69% 17% 17% 64% 19% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.977 0.979 0.777 0.939 0.955
APP/DEPART 301 / 407 419 / 482 283 / 329 811 / 596 0
4:00 PM 9 93 20 19 94 12 10 141 39 19 59 5 520 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 12 63 12 20 83 9 9 171 45 17 70 12 523 0 0 0 1 1 4:30 PM 16 75 26 29 93 10 17 175 26 18 68 16 569 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 11 74 15 27 94 14 14 153 36 22 95 18 573 0 0 0 1 1 5:00 PM 16 82 18 32 60 10 13 173 35 18 73 18 548 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 13 99 28 24 70 20 7 175 31 17 60 17 561 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM 19 85 28 27 85 13 14 175 31 17 65 16 575 0 0 0 1 1 5:45 PM 21 56 12 24 71 15 10 150 24 17 75 21 496 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 117 627 159 202 650 103 94 1,313 267 145 565 123 4,369 0 0 0 4 4 APPROACH % 13% 69% 18% 21% 68% 11% 6% 78% 16% 17% 68% 15% APP/DEPART 903 / 844 955 / 1,062 1,674 / 1,678 837 / 785 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 59 340 89 110 309 57 48 676 133 74 293 69 2,260 0 0 0 3 APPROACH % 12% 70% 18% 23% 65% 12% 6% 79% 16% 17% 67% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.871 0.881 0.969 0.807 0.981
APP/DEPART 488 / 457 476 / 516 857 / 878 439 / 409 0
Orange St

NORTH LEG
W Lugonia Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH LEG
Orange St

U-TURNS
Orange St Orange St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Orange St
W Lugonia Ave AM
7:30 AM PM
4:45 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I II.----I -I -I 1----,I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 6
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 17 10 3 5 18 26 22 36 5 2 144 2 290 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 21 23 2 6 20 24 16 52 8 11 134 10 327 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 13 23 7 15 34 36 23 87 6 8 153 24 429 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 12 33 4 9 43 36 13 76 7 19 159 23 434 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 8 46 8 9 33 37 43 72 4 7 139 52 458 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 9 56 7 27 69 42 32 73 6 15 95 85 516 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 12 22 4 30 48 34 9 79 10 10 117 29 404 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 12 16 7 9 22 20 13 79 10 12 109 15 324 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 104 229 42 110 287 255 171 554 56 84 1,050 240 3,182 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 28% 61% 11% 17% 44% 39% 22% 71% 7% 6% 76% 17% APP/DEPART 375 / 640 652 / 427 781 / 706 1,374 / 1,409 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 42 158 26 60 179 151 111 308 23 49 546 184 1,837 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 19% 70% 12% 15% 46% 39% 25% 70% 5% 6% 70% 24% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.785 0.707 0.929 0.969 0.890
APP/DEPART 226 / 453 390 / 251 442 / 394 779 / 739 0
4:00 PM 19 29 15 10 47 12 16 144 9 5 78 5 389 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 20 29 11 4 29 15 15 165 8 9 85 7 397 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 22 27 16 10 21 10 16 152 15 10 94 7 400 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 16 39 11 9 48 14 17 161 7 11 89 4 426 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 23 31 9 7 44 12 9 154 14 11 79 4 397 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 19 38 21 10 44 6 10 160 20 6 84 8 426 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 20 47 10 11 26 16 16 147 11 5 86 11 406 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 13 28 15 4 32 24 20 171 19 8 86 11 431 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 152 268 108 65 291 109 119 1,254 103 65 681 57 3,272 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 29% 51% 20% 14% 63% 23% 8% 85% 7% 8% 85% 7%
APP/DEPART 528 / 444 465 / 459 1,476 / 1,427 803 / 942 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 75 144 55 32 146 58 55 632 64 30 335 34 1,660 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 27% 53% 20% 14% 62% 25% 7% 84% 9% 8% 84% 9%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.878 0.937 0.894 0.950 0.963
APP/DEPART 274 / 233 236 / 240 751 / 719 399 / 468 0
Texas St

NORTH LEG
W San Bernardino Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W San Bernardino Ave

SOUTH LEG
Texas St AM
7:30 AM PM
5:00 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Texas St
W San Bernardino Ave

U-TURNS
Texas St Texas St W San Bernardino Ave W San Bernardino Ave -1
I I : : I
I I I I I I II.----I -I -I 1----,I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 7
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 2 0 1 0.5 0.5 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 2 52 3 28 1 27 29 40 23 1 146 62 414 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 9 53 3 40 1 25 27 60 32 2 128 61 441 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 11 81 3 58 4 33 38 92 35 5 113 94 567 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 8 62 9 37 3 29 47 95 44 9 140 99 582 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 6 84 4 61 6 28 47 121 28 6 125 76 592 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 8 79 5 51 5 27 57 137 25 14 125 76 609 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 9 101 0 40 4 7 55 88 23 6 117 88 538 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 6 74 4 32 5 19 39 69 33 8 104 45 438 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 59 586 31 347 29 195 339 702 243 51 998 601 4,181 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 9% 87% 5% 61% 5% 34% 26% 55% 19% 3% 60% 36%
APP/DEPART 676 / 1,526 571 / 323 1,284 / 1,080 1,650 / 1,252 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 33 306 21 207 18 117 189 445 132 34 503 345 2,350 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 9% 85% 6% 61% 5% 34% 25% 58% 17% 4% 57% 39%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.947 0.900 0.874 0.889 0.965
APP/DEPART 360 / 840 342 / 184 766 / 673 882 / 653 0
4:00 PM 8 114 10 68 8 30 146 123 33 6 66 58 670 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 14 119 11 73 5 25 155 146 46 4 74 57 729 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 6 134 6 59 1 28 144 157 48 10 75 53 721 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 6 125 6 70 4 21 120 145 47 10 73 54 681 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 11 123 6 73 5 22 164 149 39 11 85 42 730 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 6 116 8 58 11 33 161 159 46 5 84 50 737 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM 7 105 11 59 2 28 143 148 45 5 79 51 683 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 6 114 8 89 8 27 129 157 38 7 86 49 718 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 64 950 66 549 44 214 1,162 1,184 342 58 622 414 5,670 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 6% 88% 6% 68% 5% 27% 43% 44% 13% 5% 57% 38%
APP/DEPART 1,080 / 2,526 807 / 444 2,688 / 1,800 1,095 / 900 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 29 498 26 260 21 104 589 610 180 36 317 199 2,870 0 0 0 1 APPROACH % 5% 90% 5% 68% 5% 27% 43% 44% 13% 7% 57% 36%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.947 0.944 0.942 0.988 0.972
APP/DEPART 553 / 1,286 385 / 237 1,379 / 897 553 / 450 0 Tennessee St

NORTH LEG
W San Bernardino Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W San Bernardino Ave

SOUTH LEG
Tennessee St AM
7:30 AM PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Tennessee St
W San Bernardino Ave

U-TURNS
Tennessee St SR-210 NB Ramps W San Bernardino Ave W San Bernardino Ave -1
I I : : I
I I I I I I l.....---1 -I 1-1----,I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 8
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 2 1 3 37 61 56 16 52 4 6 73 96 407 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 3 0 2 58 62 74 20 59 4 4 70 88 444 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 2 1 5 89 65 87 13 71 3 4 71 82 493 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 2 0 8 112 99 155 12 68 6 16 78 83 639 0 0 1 0 1 8:00 AM 3 1 11 86 76 85 19 99 6 11 85 60 542 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 1 3 13 116 88 105 16 90 11 20 69 71 603 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 3 2 8 72 59 71 16 86 4 15 45 73 454 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 1 1 10 64 116 95 8 67 5 18 55 56 496 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 17 9 60 634 626 728 120 592 43 94 546 609 4,079 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 20% 10% 70% 32% 31% 37% 16% 78% 6% 8% 44% 49% APP/DEPART 86 / 738 1,988 / 763 756 / 1,286 1,249 / 1,292 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 8 5 37 403 328 432 60 328 26 51 303 296 2,278 0 0 1 0 APPROACH % 16% 10% 74% 35% 28% 37% 14% 79% 6% 8% 47% 46% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.735 0.794 0.837 0.918 0.890
APP/DEPART 50 / 361 1,163 / 405 415 / 768 650 / 744 0
4:00 PM 5 10 76 59 106 52 12 167 11 33 37 34 602 0 0 1 0 1 4:15 PM 4 3 85 76 111 49 12 186 16 28 49 36 655 0 0 1 0 1 4:30 PM 5 6 80 77 127 54 10 192 17 25 52 32 677 0 0 1 0 1 4:45 PM 7 7 67 83 133 50 8 166 33 31 42 27 654 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 10 8 91 80 132 56 17 181 23 24 58 36 716 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 3 8 97 69 99 53 14 200 35 33 64 26 701 1 0 0 0 1 5:30 PM 9 7 69 77 122 74 16 190 21 28 56 30 699 0 0 1 0 1 5:45 PM 6 14 77 77 132 51 11 170 25 27 52 38 680 0 0 2 0 2 VOLUMES 49 63 642 598 962 439 100 1,452 181 229 410 259 5,391 1 0 6 0 7 APPROACH % 6% 8% 85% 30% 48% 22% 6% 83% 10% 26% 46% 29% APP/DEPART 755 / 422 1,999 / 1,373 1,739 / 2,692 898 / 904 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 28 37 334 303 485 234 58 741 104 112 230 130 2,800 1 0 3 0 APPROACH % 7% 9% 84% 30% 47% 23% 6% 82% 11% 24% 49% 28% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.917 0.936 0.910 0.959 0.978
APP/DEPART 400 / 225 1,022 / 702 906 / 1,378 472 / 495 0 Citrus Plaza Dr

NORTH LEG
W San Bernardino Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W San Bernardino Ave

SOUTH LEG
Citrus Plaza Dr
Queue EM PM

U-TURNS
Citrus Plaza Dr SR-210 SB Ramps W San Bernardino Ave W San Bernardino Ave

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Citrus Plaza Dr
W San Bernardino Ave AM
7:30 AM PM
5:00 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I I 11-1 _1_1_1
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 9
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 30 0 24 0 18 1 0 38 13 124 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 42 0 27 1 36 0 0 70 9 185 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 44 0 21 5 35 0 0 77 13 195 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 49 1 33 2 30 0 1 109 20 245 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 1 0 0 57 1 19 3 31 0 3 107 18 240 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 75 0 14 3 56 0 6 99 14 267 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 38 3 16 5 48 0 1 108 24 243 0 0 0 1 1
8:45 AM 0 0 0 63 0 32 4 57 0 0 94 37 287 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 1 0 0 398 5 186 23 311 1 11 702 148 1,787 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 68% 1% 32% 7% 93% 0% 1% 81% 17%
APP/DEPART 1 / 171 589 / 17 335 / 710 862 / 889 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 1 0 0 233 4 81 15 192 0 10 408 93 1,038 0 0 0 1 APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 73% 1% 25% 7% 93% 0% 2% 80% 18%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.837 0.848 0.955 0.904
APP/DEPART 1 / 108 318 / 14 207 / 426 512 / 490 0
4:00 PM 2 3 5 144 2 44 22 155 1 12 101 47 538 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 4 2 9 148 5 23 14 154 0 9 86 45 499 0 1 0 0 1
4:30 PM 3 2 10 138 6 47 28 134 1 10 87 53 519 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 1 2 11 144 2 47 18 154 1 8 99 56 543 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 2 2 15 125 3 32 29 184 0 7 96 57 552 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 2 1 12 132 4 43 20 180 0 9 99 72 574 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 7 1 10 155 5 41 13 179 0 9 95 54 569 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 4 3 9 136 6 33 13 128 0 8 115 63 518 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 25 16 81 1,122 33 310 157 1,268 3 72 778 447 4,313 0 1 0 0 1 APPROACH % 20% 13% 66% 77% 2% 21% 11% 89% 0% 6% 60% 34% APP/DEPART 122 / 621 1,466 / 108 1,428 / 2,471 1,297 / 1,113 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 12 6 48 556 14 163 80 697 1 33 389 239 2,238 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 18% 9% 73% 76% 2% 22% 10% 90% 0% 5% 59% 36%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.868 0.912 0.913 0.918 0.975
APP/DEPART 66 / 325 733 / 48 778 / 1,301 661 / 564 0
Citrus Plaza Dr

NORTH LEG
W Lugonia Ave WEST LEG EAST LEG W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH LEG
Citrus Plaza Dr
Queue EB PM

U-TURNS
Citrus Plaza Dr Citrus Plaza Dr W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Citrus Plaza Dr
W Lugonia Ave AM
8:00 AM PM
4:45 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I II.----I -I -I 1----,I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 10
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 2 X X 2 0 X X X 0.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 45 65 0 0 46 21 0 0 0 28 0 26 231 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 46 62 0 0 72 34 0 0 0 38 1 24 277 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 54 72 0 0 65 39 0 0 0 40 1 22 293 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 53 96 0 0 86 20 0 0 0 38 1 26 320 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 53 120 0 0 82 18 0 0 0 46 2 27 348 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 52 110 0 0 83 32 0 0 0 36 0 19 332 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 64 113 0 0 60 22 0 0 0 36 1 37 333 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 55 97 0 0 102 24 0 0 0 45 0 31 354 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 422 735 0 0 596 210 0 0 0 307 6 212 2,488 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 36% 64% 0% 0% 74% 26% 0% 0% 0% 58% 1% 40%
APP/DEPART 1,157 / 947 806 / 903 0 / 0 525 / 638 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 224 440 0 0 327 96 0 0 0 163 3 114 1,367 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 34% 66% 0% 0% 77% 23% 0% 0% 0% 58% 1% 41%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.938 0.839 0.000 0.921 0.965
APP/DEPART 664 / 554 423 / 490 0 / 0 280 / 323 0
4:00 PM 81 201 0 0 123 13 0 0 0 36 2 44 500 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 60 175 0 0 148 26 0 0 0 25 2 42 478 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 58 188 0 0 123 16 0 0 0 25 0 57 467 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 45 187 0 0 152 18 0 0 0 40 1 43 486 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 57 193 0 0 118 20 0 0 0 44 0 52 484 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 45 181 0 0 152 19 0 0 0 32 3 48 480 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 40 191 0 0 146 25 0 0 0 26 1 39 468 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 50 165 0 0 119 14 0 0 0 24 1 53 426 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 436 1,481 0 0 1,081 151 0 0 0 252 10 378 3,789 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 23% 77% 0% 0% 88% 12% 0% 0% 0% 39% 2% 59%
APP/DEPART 1,917 / 1,859 1,232 / 1,333 0 / 0 640 / 597 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 244 751 0 0 546 73 0 0 0 126 5 186 1,931 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 25% 75% 0% 0% 88% 12% 0% 0% 0% 40% 2% 59%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.882 0.889 0.000 0.943 0.966
APP/DEPART 995 / 937 619 / 672 0 / 0 317 / 322 0
Tennessee St

NORTH LEG
I-10 WB Ramps WEST LEG EAST LEG I-10 WB Ramps

SOUTH LEG
Tennessee St

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Tennessee St
I-10 WB Ramps

U-TURNS
Tennessee St Tennessee St I-10 WB Ramps I-10 WB Ramps AM PM 8:00 AM
4:00 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I 11--I -I -I 1-----.I
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5434
Wed, May 28, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 11
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: X 2 0 1 2 X 0.5 1 0.5 X X X 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 86 17 12 63 0 25 25 63 0 0 0 291 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 88 19 23 86 0 20 36 82 0 0 0 354 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 107 21 19 88 0 23 28 96 0 0 0 382 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 121 34 19 105 0 29 52 92 0 0 0 452 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 144 40 22 105 0 31 70 102 0 0 0 514 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 127 26 19 101 0 34 36 81 0 0 0 424 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 142 35 16 83 0 34 43 80 0 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 124 37 32 117 0 29 46 119 0 0 0 504 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 0 939 229 162 748 0 225 336 715 0 0 0 3,354 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 80% 20% 18% 82% 0% 18% 26% 56% 0% 0% 0%
APP/DEPART 1,168 / 1,164 910 / 1,463 1,276 / 727 0 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 537 138 89 406 0 128 195 382 0 0 0 1,875 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 80% 20% 18% 82% 0% 18% 28% 54% 0% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.917 0.831 0.868 0.000 0.912
APP/DEPART 675 / 665 495 / 788 705 / 422 0 / 0 0
4:00 PM 0 198 34 30 133 0 79 90 111 0 0 0 675 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 162 26 43 131 0 75 74 96 0 0 0 607 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 171 29 37 111 0 70 116 99 0 0 0 633 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 154 28 44 143 0 80 89 117 0 0 0 655 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 166 19 36 128 0 82 120 104 0 0 0 655 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 155 33 53 129 0 71 94 76 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 145 27 42 126 0 87 87 125 0 0 0 639 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 144 21 38 112 0 66 53 84 0 0 0 518 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 1,295 217 323 1,013 0 610 723 812 0 0 0 4,993 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 86% 14% 24% 76% 0% 28% 34% 38% 0% 0% 0%
APP/DEPART 1,512 / 1,905 1,336 / 1,825 2,145 / 1,263 0 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 685 117 154 518 0 304 369 423 0 0 0 2,570 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 85% 15% 23% 77% 0% 28% 34% 39% 0% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.864 0.898 0.958 0.000 0.952
APP/DEPART 802 / 989 672 / 941 1,096 / 640 0 / 0 0
Tennessee St

NORTH LEG
I-10 EB Ramps WEST LEG EAST LEG I-10 EB Ramps

SOUTH LEG
Tennessee St

U-TURNS
Tennessee St Tennessee St I-10 EB Ramps I-10 EB Ramps

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Redlands
Tennessee St
I-10 EB Ramps AM
8:00 AM PM
4:00 PM
-1
I I : : I
I I I I I I I 11-1 _1_1_1
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Tennessee St LOCATION #: 1
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W Lugonia Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0,5 0,5
7:00 AM 12 40 14 6 20 0 3 23 29 23 40 19 227 0
7:15 AM 14 42 19 15 23 0 5 39 41 31 72 30 329 0
7:30 AM 16 56 13 19 27 0 10 47 28 46 77 30 366 0
7:45 AM 32 56 20 20 32 2 5 47 33 23 106 30 404 0
8:00 AM 27 73 32 24 21 2 1 46 40 27 104 44 439 0
8:15 AM 28 63 19 18 28 1 8 77 55 32 94 28 450 0
8:30 AM 41 75 24 12 20 2 4 56 33 19 97 42 423 0
8:45 AM 36 52 19 19 27 2 11 72 49 29 98 20 431 0
VOLUMES 204 456 159 133 197 9 46 405 306 228 686 241 3,068 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 25% 56% 19% 39% 58% 3% 6% 54% 40% 20% 59% 21% APP/DEPART 818 / 742 338 / 731 757 / 696 1,155 / 899 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 131 263 94 73 95 7 24 250 177 107 393 133 1,743 APPROACH % 27% 54% 19% 42% 54% 4% 5% 56% 39% 17% 62% 21% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.875 0.918 0.806 0.908 0.968
APP/DEPART 487 / 419 175 / 378 450 / 416 632 / 530 0
4:00 PM 68 90 63 24 24 1 30 180 95 18 95 49 734 0
4:15 PM 66 86 74 36 26 1 11 182 122 25 77 35 738 0
4:30 PM 70 83 56 25 21 3 13 179 92 20 81 43 683 0
4:45 PM 57 87 75 23 32 6 24 180 115 24 103 28 752 0
5:00 PM 74 99 69 28 34 7 24 210 96 16 83 46 783 0
5:15 PM 82 83 66 29 26 7 16 203 108 26 97 36 777 0
5:30 PM 62 82 77 25 22 3 12 217 119 24 95 34 769 0
5:45 PM 72 71 58 31 18 3 12 182 80 28 115 28 696 0
VOLUMES 549 678 536 220 201 31 142 1,530 826 178 744 298 5,930 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 31% 38% 30% 49% 44% 7% 6% 61% 33% 15% 61% 24% APP/DEPART 1,762 / 1,117 452 / 1,205 2,497 / 2,286 1,219 / 1,323 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 274 350 286 105 113 23 76 809 437 89 377 143 3,080 APPROACH % 30% 38% 31% 43% 47% 10% 6% 61% 33% 15% 62% 24% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.943 0.878 0.951 0.963 0.983
APP/DEPART 910 / 569 241 / 639 1,322 / 1,199 609 / 674 0 Tennessee St

NORTH SIDE
W Lugonia Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Tennessee St

U-TURNS
Tennessee St Tennessee St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave AM 8:00 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Driveway LOCATION #: 2
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W Lugonia Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 2 1 1 1 X
7:00 AM 13 0 12 0 0 0 0 37 6 4 72 0 143 0
7:15 AM 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 50 23 7 123 0 222 0
7:30 AM 15 0 8 0 0 0 0 52 27 10 137 0 247 0
7:45 AM 17 0 19 0 0 0 0 62 25 5 142 0 269 0
8:00 AM 26 0 14 0 0 0 0 86 16 7 149 0 296 0
8:15 AM 22 0 18 0 0 0 0 87 27 6 133 0 291 0
8:30 AM 29 0 11 0 0 0 0 72 19 11 130 0 271 0
8:45 AM 25 0 13 0 0 0 0 87 22 7 121 0 274 0
VOLUMES 154 0 102 0 0 0 0 531 163 56 1,006 0 2,011 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 60% 0% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 77% 23% 5% 95% 0%
APP/DEPART 256 / 0 0 / 219 694 / 633 1,062 / 1,159 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 92 0 60 0 0 0 0 307 87 29 553 0 1,127
APPROACH % 61% 0% 39% 0% 0% 0% 0% 78% 22% 5% 95% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.974 0.000 0.866 0.935 0.951
APP/DEPART 152 / 0 0 / 116 393 / 367 582 / 645 0
4:00 PM 25 0 25 0 0 0 0 243 24 7 136 0 460 0
4:15 PM 24 0 19 0 0 0 0 264 28 8 113 0 454 0
4:30 PM 31 0 18 0 0 0 0 243 17 12 113 0 433 0
4:45 PM 18 0 17 0 0 0 0 253 24 10 137 0 459 0
5:00 PM 18 0 24 0 0 0 0 275 32 8 127 0 483 0
5:15 PM 24 0 23 0 0 0 0 265 33 6 134 0 484 0
5:30 PM 26 0 28 0 0 0 0 286 28 11 127 0 505 0
5:45 PM 22 0 12 0 0 0 0 261 9 14 148 0 466 0
VOLUMES 187 0 166 0 0 0 0 2,088 193 76 1,034 0 3,742 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 53% 0% 47% 0% 0% 0% 0% 92% 8% 7% 93% 0%
APP/DEPART 352 / 0 0 / 269 2,281 / 2,253 1,109 / 1,220 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 89 0 87 0 0 0 0 1,086 101 39 536 0 1,937
APPROACH % 51% 0% 49% 0% 0% 0% 0% 91% 9% 7% 93% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.828 0.000 0.946 0.887 0.960
APP/DEPART 176 / 0 0 / 140 1,187 / 1,172 575 / 625 0
Driveway

NORTH SIDE
W Lugonia Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Driveway

U-TURNS
Driveway Driveway W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave AM
7:45 AM PM
5:00 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: New York St LOCATION #: 3
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W Lugonia Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0.5 X 0.5 X X X X 2 1 1 1 X
7:00 AM 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 47 14 4 78 0 150 0
7:15 AM 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 55 20 8 121 0 220 0
7:30 AM 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 15 15 157 0 250 0
7:45 AM 22 0 7 0 0 0 0 82 22 15 148 0 295 0
8:00 AM 29 0 8 0 0 0 0 86 25 13 159 0 319 0
8:15 AM 17 0 6 0 0 0 0 103 21 7 141 0 294 0
8:30 AM 23 0 4 0 0 0 0 77 16 12 132 0 264 0
8:45 AM 21 0 13 0 0 0 0 87 39 12 126 0 297 0
VOLUMES 148 0 39 0 0 0 0 586 171 85 1,061 0 2,089 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 79% 0% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 77% 23% 7% 93% 0%
APP/DEPART 187 / 0 0 / 256 757 / 625 1,145 / 1,209 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 91 0 24 0 0 0 0 347 84 47 580 0 1,172
APPROACH % 79% 0% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 81% 19% 7% 93% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.784 0.000 0.869 0.911 0.918
APP/DEPART 115 / 0 0 / 131 431 / 371 627 / 671 0
4:00 PM 56 0 10 0 0 0 0 250 51 6 106 0 478 0
4:15 PM 39 0 14 0 0 0 0 265 54 8 94 0 473 0
4:30 PM 51 0 22 0 0 0 0 222 48 7 98 0 446 0
4:45 PM 45 0 17 0 0 0 0 257 61 15 108 0 501 0
5:00 PM 57 0 15 0 0 0 0 259 56 5 107 0 497 0
5:15 PM 38 0 11 0 0 0 0 252 53 5 104 0 462 0
5:30 PM 44 0 10 0 0 0 0 278 64 2 104 0 502 0
5:45 PM 56 0 12 0 0 0 0 239 48 9 117 0 481 0
VOLUMES 384 0 109 0 0 0 0 2,021 433 56 835 0 3,837 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 82% 18% 6% 94% 0%
APP/DEPART 493 / 0 0 / 489 2,454 / 2,129 891 / 1,219 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 183 0 52 0 0 0 0 1,045 233 27 421 0 1,960
APPROACH % 78% 0% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 82% 18% 6% 94% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.826 0.000 0.934 0.914 0.977
APP/DEPART 235 / 0 0 / 260 1,278 / 1,097 448 / 604 0
New York St

NORTH SIDE
W Lugonia Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH SIDE
New York St

U-TURNS
New York St New York St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave AM
7:45 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Texas St LOCATION #: 4
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W Lugonia Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 0
7:00 AM 4 22 5 2 32 7 2 33 11 15 60 4 196 0
7:15 AM 8 32 11 1 43 9 5 40 11 16 115 3 292 0
7:30 AM 22 37 14 2 52 14 1 43 4 31 120 3 342 0
7:45 AM 12 33 22 4 72 17 5 65 14 41 125 2 410 0
8:00 AM 20 49 18 3 60 9 11 66 10 24 132 5 405 0
8:15 AM 6 50 14 8 89 18 11 74 17 31 114 4 434 0
8:30 AM 17 27 15 5 50 15 7 56 14 40 103 3 352 0
8:45 AM 18 28 12 2 51 16 7 68 23 27 96 3 348 0
VOLUMES 106 277 110 27 447 104 47 443 103 223 864 27 2,776 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 22% 56% 22% 5% 77% 18% 8% 75% 17% 20% 78% 2% APP/DEPART 493 / 350 578 / 773 592 / 580 1,114 / 1,074 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 55 158 69 20 270 59 32 260 55 136 474 14 1,599
APPROACH % 19% 56% 24% 6% 77% 17% 9% 75% 16% 22% 76% 2% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.812 0.758 0.858 0.930 0.922
APP/DEPART 281 / 204 349 / 460 347 / 349 623 / 587 0
4:00 PM 15 43 20 6 51 14 13 218 28 24 89 5 523 0
4:15 PM 22 61 38 7 54 3 13 206 33 16 67 3 521 0
4:30 PM 18 69 27 2 44 7 9 185 29 16 78 3 486 0
4:45 PM 18 57 22 6 50 14 19 202 33 18 85 5 528 0
5:00 PM 31 68 30 4 53 7 9 214 28 14 79 6 540 0
5:15 PM 22 75 25 7 56 10 13 200 30 20 64 7 528 0
5:30 PM 18 64 19 4 42 11 21 223 33 16 77 6 532 0
5:45 PM 19 63 25 6 52 11 19 179 16 12 84 7 492 0
VOLUMES 162 498 205 42 401 77 115 1,626 228 134 622 42 4,149 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 19% 58% 24% 8% 77% 15% 6% 83% 12% 17% 78% 5% APP/DEPART 864 / 654 520 / 763 1,969 / 1,873 798 / 860 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 89 264 96 21 200 42 62 838 123 67 304 24 2,128
APPROACH % 20% 59% 21% 8% 76% 16% 6% 82% 12% 17% 77% 6% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.874 0.905 0.925 0.919 0.985
APP/DEPART 448 / 349 263 / 390 1,023 / 955 395 / 434 0
Texas St

NORTH SIDE
W Lugonia Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Texas St AM
7:45 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Texas St Texas St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Orange St LOCATION #: 5
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W Lugonia Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 1
7:00 AM 11 35 21 10 48 7 5 33 10 47 79 14 318 0
7:15 AM 8 38 4 7 55 12 11 26 8 43 114 26 350 0
7:30 AM 9 54 33 15 81 18 10 32 17 51 128 45 490 0
7:45 AM 8 59 12 22 70 15 12 53 16 26 128 37 456 0
8:00 AM 8 57 12 26 77 10 10 61 4 41 139 35 478 0
8:15 AM 12 51 20 19 81 10 13 78 14 33 140 48 517 0
8:30 AM 9 45 16 23 113 16 11 38 10 42 111 29 461 0
8:45 AM 11 42 12 21 84 10 7 52 13 25 103 21 399 0
VOLUMES 76 381 128 142 607 97 77 371 91 307 941 254 3,469 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 13% 65% 22% 17% 72% 11% 14% 69% 17% 20% 63% 17% APP/DEPART 584 / 712 845 / 1,004 539 / 640 1,501 / 1,113 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 37 221 76 81 308 52 44 223 51 151 535 164 1,941 APPROACH % 11% 66% 23% 18% 70% 12% 14% 70% 16% 18% 63% 19% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.868 0.975 0.760 0.950 0.939
APP/DEPART 334 / 429 441 / 509 318 / 380 850 / 624 0
4:00 PM 9 95 21 19 99 12 11 148 40 23 61 5 541 0
4:15 PM 13 63 14 20 85 9 9 176 47 18 73 13 538 0
4:30 PM 18 78 28 30 96 10 17 180 26 21 70 16 588 0
4:45 PM 11 74 20 28 94 14 14 156 36 23 96 19 583 0
5:00 PM 16 83 18 32 62 10 13 182 36 19 75 18 563 0
5:15 PM 14 100 29 24 71 20 7 178 32 20 60 18 572 0
5:30 PM 19 89 31 28 86 13 14 178 31 17 67 18 589 0
5:45 PM 21 57 12 24 73 15 10 154 25 20 75 22 507 0
VOLUMES 121 638 171 204 665 103 95 1,349 272 160 576 128 4,479 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 13% 69% 18% 21% 68% 11% 6% 79% 16% 18% 67% 15% APP/DEPART 930 / 861 971 / 1,096 1,716 / 1,723 863 / 800 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 60 345 97 111 313 57 48 693 135 79 298 72 2,306 APPROACH % 12% 69% 19% 23% 65% 12% 5% 79% 15% 18% 66% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.880 0.887 0.950 0.818 0.979
APP/DEPART 502 / 465 481 / 526 876 / 901 448 / 415 0
Orange St

NORTH SIDE
W Lugonia Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Orange St

U-TURNS
Orange St Orange St W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave AM
7:30 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Texas St LOCATION #: 6
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W San Bernardino Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
7:00 AM 17 11 5 10 23 28 27 44 6 2 155 4 331 0
7:15 AM 22 25 2 9 20 24 17 59 8 12 141 11 349 0
7:30 AM 14 24 7 15 37 36 26 96 6 9 163 29 460 0
7:45 AM 12 33 4 13 45 38 13 85 9 20 168 24 462 0
8:00 AM 9 49 11 10 33 39 48 85 5 7 149 56 497 0
8:15 AM 11 57 7 31 71 43 37 81 6 15 108 90 554 0
8:30 AM 16 24 5 40 49 35 10 85 10 10 133 34 448 0
8:45 AM 13 16 8 13 23 20 16 89 11 13 117 17 354 0
VOLUMES 112 238 48 141 299 262 193 622 60 87 1,132 263 3,454 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 28% 60% 12% 20% 43% 37% 22% 71% 7% 6% 76% 18% APP/DEPART 398 / 693 701 / 445 875 / 811 1,481 / 1,505 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 45 162 29 69 185 155 124 347 25 51 587 198 1,973 APPROACH % 19% 69% 12% 17% 45% 38% 25% 70% 5% 6% 70% 24% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.790 0.708 0.903 0.984 0.890
APP/DEPART 236 / 483 408 / 260 495 / 444 835 / 787 0
4:00 PM 19 30 16 14 48 12 16 148 9 5 81 5 401 0
4:15 PM 21 30 12 5 30 15 15 168 8 10 92 8 411 0
4:30 PM 22 28 17 11 21 11 16 157 16 11 100 8 416 0
4:45 PM 17 40 11 9 48 14 17 164 8 12 94 4 435 0
5:00 PM 23 32 9 8 45 13 9 159 14 12 82 4 408 0
5:15 PM 19 38 22 10 46 6 10 165 20 6 85 9 435 0
5:30 PM 20 47 10 11 27 19 16 155 11 5 91 11 421 0
5:45 PM 14 28 17 4 34 24 20 175 19 8 88 11 440 0
VOLUMES 154 271 113 71 297 113 119 1,289 104 68 711 59 3,367 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 29% 50% 21% 15% 62% 23% 8% 85% 7% 8% 85% 7%
APP/DEPART 538 / 449 480 / 468 1,512 / 1,473 837 / 977 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 76 145 58 33 151 61 55 653 64 31 345 35 1,704
APPROACH % 27% 52% 21% 13% 62% 25% 7% 85% 8% 7% 84% 8%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.880 0.940 0.903 0.958 0.968
APP/DEPART 278 / 235 245 / 245 772 / 743 410 / 482 0
Texas St

NORTH SIDE
W San Bernardino Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W San Bernardino Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Texas St AM
7:30 AM PM
5:00 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Texas St Texas St W San Bernardino Ave W San Bernardino Ave I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Tennessee St LOCATION #: 7
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W San Bernardino Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 2 0 1 0.5 0.5 2 1 1 1 1 1
7:00 AM 2 59 3 40 2 30 30 46 24 1 157 65 457 0
7:15 AM 10 56 3 44 1 25 30 65 36 2 136 64 470 0
7:30 AM 14 86 3 62 6 33 42 100 36 5 119 98 603 0
7:45 AM 9 69 10 41 3 32 52 102 44 9 144 107 620 0
8:00 AM 6 96 4 73 7 31 52 130 31 6 132 80 646 0
8:15 AM 8 87 6 57 5 28 68 145 27 14 139 78 661 0
8:30 AM 12 111 0 45 4 8 58 91 24 6 130 95 581 0
8:45 AM 7 78 4 38 5 24 41 73 37 8 108 50 470 0
VOLUMES 67 640 33 398 32 210 373 750 257 51 1,063 635 4,506 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 9% 87% 4% 62% 5% 33% 27% 54% 19% 3% 61% 36%
APP/DEPART 739 / 1,647 640 / 340 1,379 / 1,180 1,749 / 1,340 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 37 338 23 233 21 123 214 476 137 34 533 363 2,529 APPROACH % 9% 85% 6% 62% 5% 33% 26% 58% 17% 4% 57% 39%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.935 0.855 0.863 0.895 0.957
APP/DEPART 397 / 914 376 / 192 827 / 731 930 / 693 0
4:00 PM 8 120 10 69 8 35 153 127 35 6 69 59 696 0
4:15 PM 15 123 11 74 5 26 155 147 48 4 79 58 744 0
4:30 PM 7 137 6 66 1 29 148 163 50 11 78 56 748 0
4:45 PM 6 130 6 71 4 24 124 150 49 10 78 56 707 0
5:00 PM 11 128 6 76 6 24 165 152 40 11 88 43 748 0
5:15 PM 6 121 8 60 13 33 165 162 49 5 85 52 758 0
5:30 PM 7 107 11 64 3 30 146 153 45 5 81 56 706 0
5:45 PM 6 119 8 91 10 32 132 160 38 7 88 50 739 0
VOLUMES 66 983 66 569 49 231 1,186 1,213 353 59 645 427 5,843 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 6% 88% 6% 67% 6% 27% 43% 44% 13% 5% 57% 38%
APP/DEPART 1,114 / 2,595 849 / 460 2,751 / 1,847 1,130 / 941 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 30 514 26 272 24 109 601 627 188 37 329 206 2,960 APPROACH % 5% 90% 5% 67% 6% 27% 42% 44% 13% 6% 58% 36%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.956 0.953 0.942 0.991 0.977
APP/DEPART 570 / 1,321 404 / 248 1,415 / 924 571 / 468 0 Tennessee St

NORTH SIDE
W San Bernardino Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W San Bernardino Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Tennessee St AM
7:30 AM PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Tennessee St SR-210 NB Ramps W San Bernardino Ave W San Bernardino Ave I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Citrus Plaza Dr LOCATION #: 8
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W San Bernardino Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 0 1 1 1
7:00 AM 2 3 3 41 65 60 16 56 4 7 77 106 438 0
7:15 AM 3 0 2 61 63 78 24 67 4 4 72 95 472 0
7:30 AM 2 1 5 97 71 93 16 77 3 4 76 86 529 0
7:45 AM 2 0 8 120 101 161 12 74 10 17 81 86 671 0
8:00 AM 3 3 12 90 78 89 22 108 6 11 89 66 576 0
8:15 AM 1 3 16 121 92 107 17 104 12 20 73 84 646 0
8:30 AM 3 2 8 75 63 78 20 89 4 15 50 83 489 0
8:45 AM 1 2 10 69 119 103 9 72 9 21 59 59 530 0
VOLUMES 17 14 64 672 650 767 134 645 51 98 576 663 4,349 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 18% 14% 68% 32% 31% 37% 16% 78% 6% 7% 43% 50% APP/DEPART 94 / 810 2,089 / 799 830 / 1,381 1,337 / 1,360 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 8 7 41 427 341 449 66 362 31 52 318 322 2,421
APPROACH % 14% 13% 73% 35% 28% 37% 14% 79% 7% 8% 46% 46% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.712 0.797 0.845 0.940 0.902
APP/DEPART 56 / 395 1,216 / 423 458 / 829 692 / 775 0
4:00 PM 5 10 76 61 107 55 13 177 11 33 42 37 626 0
4:15 PM 4 3 86 79 113 51 13 186 16 28 52 39 668 0
4:30 PM 5 6 80 82 129 55 12 197 17 25 56 33 695 0
4:45 PM 8 7 68 86 143 52 8 175 34 31 49 28 687 0
5:00 PM 10 9 91 82 134 59 19 184 23 24 61 38 733 0
5:15 PM 3 8 97 73 100 53 14 206 35 33 65 26 712 0
5:30 PM 10 8 69 77 123 75 16 197 21 29 59 30 713 0
5:45 PM 7 14 79 80 132 51 11 171 25 28 57 39 693 0
VOLUMES 51 64 645 617 979 449 106 1,493 182 230 441 269 5,524 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 7% 8% 85% 30% 48% 22% 6% 84% 10% 24% 47% 29% APP/DEPART 760 / 438 2,045 / 1,391 1,780 / 2,755 939 / 940 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 30 38 336 311 489 237 60 758 104 113 242 133 2,850 APPROACH % 7% 9% 83% 30% 47% 23% 7% 82% 11% 23% 50% 27% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.921 0.944 0.903 0.984 0.973
APP/DEPART 404 / 231 1,037 / 706 922 / 1,405 488 / 509 0 Citrus Plaza Dr

NORTH SIDE
W San Bernardino Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W San Bernardino Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Citrus Plaza Dr

U-TURNS
Citrus Plaza Dr SR-210 SB Ramps W San Bernardino Ave W San Bernardino Ave AM 7:30 AM PM
5:00 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Citrus Plaza Dr LOCATION #: 9
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: W Lugonia Ave CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 1 1 2 0 1 2 0
7:00 AM 0 0 0 33 0 25 0 22 2 0 39 13 133 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 46 0 27 1 39 0 0 76 9 197 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 48 0 21 6 36 0 0 79 14 204 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 52 1 34 2 32 0 1 113 21 256 0
8:00 AM 2 0 0 60 1 19 4 33 0 3 112 18 251 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 80 0 14 5 60 0 6 102 15 281 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 41 3 16 5 50 0 1 111 26 253 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 70 0 32 5 62 0 0 96 40 304 0
VOLUMES 2 0 0 428 5 188 27 333 2 11 728 154 1,877 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 69% 1% 30% 7% 92% 1% 1% 82% 17%
APP/DEPART 2 / 181 621 / 18 362 / 761 893 / 917 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 2 0 0 250 4 81 18 205 0 10 421 98 1,088
APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 75% 1% 24% 8% 92% 0% 2% 80% 19%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.821 0.843 0.957 0.896
APP/DEPART 2 / 116 335 / 14 223 / 455 529 / 504 0
4:00 PM 2 3 5 145 2 46 22 155 1 12 104 47 544 0
4:15 PM 4 2 9 149 5 23 16 157 0 9 87 48 508 0
4:30 PM 3 2 10 139 6 49 28 135 1 10 90 53 525 0
4:45 PM 1 2 11 154 2 48 18 154 1 8 102 57 556 0
5:00 PM 2 2 15 128 3 32 30 186 0 7 99 57 561 0
5:15 PM 2 1 12 133 4 45 21 182 0 9 99 73 580 0
5:30 PM 7 1 10 157 5 42 13 181 0 9 96 55 575 0
5:45 PM 4 3 9 137 6 33 13 129 0 8 117 65 523 0
VOLUMES 25 16 81 1,140 33 317 160 1,277 3 72 793 453 4,370 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 20% 13% 66% 77% 2% 21% 11% 89% 0% 5% 60% 34% APP/DEPART 122 / 629 1,490 / 108 1,440 / 2,498 1,318 / 1,135 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 12 6 48 572 14 167 81 702 1 33 396 241 2,271
APPROACH % 18% 9% 73% 76% 2% 22% 10% 90% 0% 5% 59% 36%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.868 0.922 0.910 0.927 0.980
APP/DEPART 66 / 328 752 / 48 784 / 1,322 669 / 574 0
Citrus Plaza Dr

NORTH SIDE
W Lugonia Ave WEST SIDE EAST SIDE W Lugonia Ave

SOUTH SIDE
Citrus Plaza Dr

U-TURNS
Citrus Plaza Dr Citrus Plaza Dr W Lugonia Ave W Lugonia Ave AM 8:00 AM PM
4:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Tennessee St LOCATION #: 10
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: I-10 WB Ramps CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 2 X X 2 0 X X X 0.5 1 0.5
7:00 AM 47 70 0 0 50 25 0 0 0 30 0 30 250 0
7:15 AM 46 65 0 0 83 36 0 0 0 39 1 26 295 0
7:30 AM 55 78 0 0 68 40 0 0 0 42 2 24 307 0
7:45 AM 56 104 0 0 90 21 0 0 0 40 1 27 338 0
8:00 AM 55 133 0 0 87 22 0 0 0 49 2 30 377 0
8:15 AM 54 127 0 0 88 38 0 0 0 38 0 21 365 0
8:30 AM 66 123 0 0 65 24 0 0 0 37 1 38 353 0
8:45 AM 58 103 0 0 108 27 0 0 0 47 0 33 375 0
VOLUMES 435 802 0 0 638 231 0 0 0 320 7 228 2,658 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 35% 65% 0% 0% 73% 27% 0% 0% 0% 58% 1% 41%
APP/DEPART 1,236 / 1,029 868 / 958 0 / 0 554 / 672 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 232 486 0 0 348 110 0 0 0 171 3 121 1,469
APPROACH % 32% 68% 0% 0% 76% 24% 0% 0% 0% 58% 1% 41%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.953 0.850 0.000 0.909 0.974
APP/DEPART 717 / 607 458 / 519 0 / 0 295 / 344 0
4:00 PM 89 209 0 0 126 14 0 0 0 38 2 45 522 0
4:15 PM 60 183 0 0 152 26 0 0 0 26 2 44 492 0
4:30 PM 59 192 0 0 126 16 0 0 0 26 0 62 480 0
4:45 PM 46 189 0 0 158 19 0 0 0 40 1 44 496 0
5:00 PM 59 200 0 0 120 22 0 0 0 44 0 55 499 0
5:15 PM 46 185 0 0 157 19 0 0 0 33 3 49 491 0
5:30 PM 41 194 0 0 149 26 0 0 0 27 1 41 477 0
5:45 PM 54 168 0 0 119 15 0 0 0 25 2 53 434 0
VOLUMES 451 1,519 0 0 1,106 155 0 0 0 258 11 391 3,890 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 23% 77% 0% 0% 88% 12% 0% 0% 0% 39% 2% 59%
APP/DEPART 1,970 / 1,910 1,261 / 1,363 0 / 0 659 / 617 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 253 773 0 0 562 74 0 0 0 130 5 194 1,990
APPROACH % 25% 75% 0% 0% 88% 12% 0% 0% 0% 39% 2% 59%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.862 0.895 0.000 0.933 0.953
APP/DEPART 1,026 / 967 636 / 691 0 / 0 329 / 332 0
Tennessee St

NORTH SIDE
I-10 WB Ramps WEST SIDE EAST SIDE I-10 WB Ramps

SOUTH SIDE
Tennessee St
8:00 AM
4:00 PM AM PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Tennessee St Tennessee St I-10 WB Ramps I-10 WB Ramps
I - 1
I l----1-1 I Fl H
DATE: LOCATION: Redlands PROJECT #: SC5434
5/28/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Tennessee St LOCATION #: 11
WEDNESDAY EAST & WEST: I-10 EB Ramps CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: X 2 0 1 2 X 0.5 1 0.5 X X X
7:00 AM 0 88 19 13 65 0 29 26 67 0 0 0 306 0
7:15 AM 0 91 26 30 91 0 20 43 84 0 0 0 384 0
7:30 AM 0 111 22 23 90 0 27 31 101 0 0 0 405 0
7:45 AM 0 130 35 22 108 0 30 55 93 0 0 0 472 0
8:00 AM 0 156 47 26 110 0 34 76 106 0 0 0 553 0
8:15 AM 0 139 33 21 106 0 43 37 84 0 0 0 462 0
8:30 AM 0 147 38 19 86 0 38 50 84 0 0 0 462 0
8:45 AM 0 131 39 37 121 0 31 50 133 0 0 0 540 0
VOLUMES 0 992 257 189 776 0 251 367 751 0 0 0 3,582 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 79% 21% 20% 80% 0% 18% 27% 55% 0% 0% 0%
APP/DEPART 1,249 / 1,243 965 / 1,527 1,368 / 812 0 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 573 156 102 422 0 146 213 406 0 0 0 2,016
APPROACH % 0% 79% 21% 19% 81% 0% 19% 28% 53% 0% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.901 0.834 0.886 0.000 0.912
APP/DEPART 728 / 718 524 / 828 764 / 470 0 / 0 0
4:00 PM 0 207 35 31 138 0 86 92 113 0 0 0 700 0
4:15 PM 0 165 27 43 135 0 81 76 101 0 0 0 627 0
4:30 PM 0 171 30 38 115 0 74 117 102 0 0 0 646 0
4:45 PM 0 156 28 46 147 0 82 91 126 0 0 0 675 0
5:00 PM 0 170 20 37 129 0 87 124 107 0 0 0 673 0
5:15 PM 0 157 36 54 134 0 74 94 78 0 0 0 625 0
5:30 PM 0 146 28 43 129 0 90 90 130 0 0 0 654 0
5:45 PM 0 150 23 39 112 0 67 53 85 0 0 0 528 0
VOLUMES 0 1,320 225 329 1,038 0 638 737 840 0 0 0 5,126 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 85% 15% 24% 76% 0% 29% 33% 38% 0% 0% 0%
APP/DEPART 1,545 / 1,958 1,366 / 1,878 2,215 / 1,290 0 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 698 119 157 534 0 322 376 441 0 0 0 2,646
APPROACH % 0% 85% 15% 23% 77% 0% 28% 33% 39% 0% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.846 0.895 0.955 0.000 0.946
APP/DEPART 817 / 1,020 691 / 975 1,138 / 652 0 / 0 0
Tennessee St

NORTH SIDE
I-10 EB Ramps WEST SIDE EAST SIDE I-10 EB Ramps

SOUTH SIDE
Tennessee St

U-TURNS
Tennessee St Tennessee St I-10 EB Ramps I-10 EB Ramps AM 8:00 AM PM
4:00 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
I - 1
I l--1-1--1-1 IFl H
Redlands Marketplace Traffic Impact Analysis – October 2025 Appendix C: Synchro Analysis
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Tennessee St & W Lugonia Ave 10/15/2025
Existing AM 12:36 pm 06/13/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report