Cities Index.
J.1- Blue Folder

Redondo Beach City Council
May 10, 2022

Document
J.1- Blue Folder
Meeting
May 10, 2022
Body
Redondo Beach City Council
Original file
1.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on redondo.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

BLUE FOLDER ITEM
Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 10, 2022
J.1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
From: Mark Nelson (Home Gmail)
To: CityClerk
Subject: Public Comment on Non-Agenda Item per the Brown Act - Mayor and Council, Planning Commissioners Date: Friday, May 6, 2022 2:43:34 PM
Attachments: Hospital residents 3 beach cities.PNG
image.png
image.png
CAUTION: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.

Dear Mayor, Council, and Planning Commissioners:

The following is a non-agenda item public comment for the next general (non-special meeting) body meetings after 5/6/2022 in accordance with the Brown Act.

By now, everyone knows that over 80% of the proposed BCHD facility is being built for the use of NON TAXPAYER-OWNERS of BCHD. It's a use of OUR Public OWNED & ZONED land that was explicitly for the benefit of the 3 Beach Cities that formed the District. PERIOD.

There was NO AMBIGUITY in the Resolution of Public Convenience and Necessity when the Hospital district was formed "for the various residents who reside within the ... District." The land wasn't condemned for 80% use of non-residents for RCFE, nor for 96% use of non-residents for PACE.

[email protected] continues to amass a mailing list to keep the local residents informed.

BCHD willfully misstates its service area to its trade association of Health Districts, from LAX to the south of PV. Clearly, we all know that definition is not the legal definition of the District.

Why does HERMOSA/MANHATTAN/REDONDO pay 100% of the taxes and provide 100% of the land if BCHD only provides us 20% or less of the services and benefits? In fact, we only received only 16% of the Covid testing and only 55% of the Covid vaccines despite using our land, facility, staff, and property taxes.

BCHDs use of P-CF publicly owned land for 80%+ non-residents is an illegitimate use, and does not provide net benefits to Redondo Beach residents.

← All documents from this meeting