Cities Index.
N.5- Blue Folder

Redondo Beach City Council
November 15, 2022

Document
N.5- Blue Folder
Meeting
November 15, 2022
Body
Redondo Beach City Council
Original file
278 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on redondo.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

BLUE FOLDER ITEM
Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 15, 2022
N.5 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION PERTAINING TO RESOLUTIONS ADDING MEASURES TO THE MARCH 7, 2023 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION BALLOT TO

AMEND CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER PURSUANT TO
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CHARTER REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE; SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS AND REBUTTALS; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE IMPARTIAL ANALYSES; AND TO ASSIGN LETTER

DESIGATIONS TO EACH BALLOT MEASURE
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK

BALLOT LANGUAGE RECOMMENDATIONS
From: Rolf Strutzenberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:37 PM
To: Eleanor Manzano <[email protected]>; eugene eugenesolomon.com <[email protected]>
Cc: Vickie Kroneberger <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Council Agenda Item N5 11-15-22
CAUTION: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.

The clear intent of this during discussion was that the amounts could not be amended without at least 5 years passing between amendments.

For example if the base was set in June 2023 it could not be first amended until at least after June 2028, then as a further example if the first amendment was not actually done until January 2028 it could not again be amended until after January 2033 (I remember making this specific point with City Manager and he concurred).

So, with that, I would propose just changing to "and not less than 5 years between amendments"
Rolf
On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 01:15:14 PM PST, eugene eugenesolomon.com <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello all
How about this as a correction
Instead of
and not more than 5 years between amendments

← All documents from this meeting