Cities Index.
Community Parking Workshop Presentation April 28 2022

Redondo Beach City Council
September 5, 2023

Document
Community Parking Workshop Presentation April 28 2022
Meeting
September 5, 2023
Body
Redondo Beach City Council
Original file
1.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on redondo.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Parking Study
Workshop

FOR THE ARTESIA & AVIATION CORRIDORS AREA

PLAN (AACAP)

PRESENTED BY NICO BOYD & MARTA POLOVIN
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
What is the AACAP?
The 2020 Artesia & Aviation Corridors Area Plan (AACAP) is a vision-driven document that provides analysis, strategies and implementable actions aimed at revitalizing the Corridors—creating place, connectivity and character within North Redondo.

What is the parking implementation plan?
The parking implementation plan will be a document that supports the implementation of AACAP's vision via community and datadriven parking and mobility management strategies and actions. It will also guide Zoning Code updates within the AACAP.

The parking workshop is intended to:
• Present results from the most recent parking study conducted for AACAP • Review implementation options for parking and mobility strategies from the AACAP as well as best practices from other communities • Receive community input on implementation options to guide the preparation of the AACAP parking implementation plan Overview
Introduction

AACAP PARKING STUDY WORKSHOP
This workshop presentation consists of three key portions:

FILL
WITH

PICTURE
Discussion of the
projections for future
parking needs

PARKING

ANALYSIS
Review of proposed
AACAP parking
measures

PROPOSED

MEASURES
Exploration of
parking management
best practices for
consideration in the
AACAP
BEST

PRACTICES
LoopNet
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
Parking
Analysis
The previous study in 2019 generally found that:
1) Off-street and on-street parking throughout the Corridors was underutilized An efficiently parked area would be 85% utilized (with a 15% buffer for vacancy)—at most, within the Corridors, on-street parking was utilized 68% and off-street parking utilized 50%. 2) Peak parking demand was less than half of what was predicted by the Urban Land Institute parking model Previous Study

REVIEW OF

PARCEL DATA
Using previously collected parking
inventory & occupancy data and
updating it to include new uses (like the
CVS) and refine land uses, we updated
existing conditions. For future conditions,
the City identified parcels within activity
nodes for future growth.

PARKING DEMAND

ESTIMATES
Using the 3rd Edition Shared Parking Tool,
from the Urban Land Institute, we
calculated existing and future parking
demand based on target land use ratios
and FAR growth.

Methodology
Methodology

KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Parking study evaluates the potential need for increased parking supply based on anticipated land use changes proposed in the AACAP, including:
• Redevelopment preferred around activity nodes
• Proposed 0.5 to 0.6 FAR increase within the AACAP
• Office and dining as preferred land uses for redevelopment Parcels within activity nodes were identified by Staff and presumed to redevelop to office (50%) and dining (50%) uses for the purpose of the shared parking analysis. Built square footage at these parcels were grown by 20% over existing conditions to account for the FAR increase
Methodology

FUTURE MOBILITY CHANGES
• Future scenarios were developed by calculating range in possible adoption of existing and future mobility options like autonomous vehicles, work from home, and transportation network companies (TNCs). Other factors include: online shopping, transit recovery, and electric vehicle adoption (e-scooters and e-bikes). Scenarios were classified as: higher, mid and lower demand. • In a higher demand future, “business would continue as usual” – where parking demand would continue to increase (low levels of AVs, TNCs, less walking/biking/taking transit, lower work from home rates etc.) • In a lower demand future, the transportation environment of the corridors would transform significantly (due to higher levels of AVs, TNCs, more walking/biking/taking transit, higher work from home rates etc.)
Results
Existing Conditions Future Parking Analysis
Existing Off &
On-Street Parking
Supply
Total Existing
Parking Supply
Existing On &
Off-Street
Observed
Parking Demand
Higher Demand
Future
Mid Demand
Future
Lower Demand
Future
Weekday 2,189 (Off-Street)
688 (On-Street) 2, 877
1,572 2,690 2,480 2,150
Weekend 1,406 1,760 1,620 1,410
Additional Parking Spaces Needed (if 100% off-street parking) +500 +290 0 Additional Parking Spaces Needed (if on-street parking maintained) 0 0 0 To calculate future demand, we added a 15% supply buffer to allow for efficient parking access and circulation. Future estimates calibrated down by 10% to reflect existing demand/prior study & rounded to the nearest tenth.

Results
• In total, up to 500 parking spaces would be needed across all scenarios if goal is to accommodate 100% of parking off-street. • The next sections will describe measures aimed at either:
• Directly providing additional supply
• Implementing management strategies, or a combination of additional supply and management strategies

DISCUSSION
Polling: [Parking Investments] Do you want
to see investments in increasing parking or
increasing mobility options?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

I’d like to see greater investment in mobility options
I’d like to see investment in both mobility options & parking supply I’d like to see greater investment in parking supply
Polling: [Parking Investments] Would you
support converting on-street parking to offstreet parking? Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
AACAP
Mobility &
Parking
Strategies
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
 Shared Parking Solutions
 Reduce Parking Requirements
 “Park Once” Public Parking Garages
 Remove On-Street Parking
 Pick-up & Drop-off Zones for TNCs and AVs
 Streetlet Public Space
 Bike & Mobility Device Parking
 Transit Curb Extensions
 Activity Nodes
 Metered Parking
 In-Lieu Fees
Parking measures identified by the AACAP include:

AACAP Measures

PARKING & MOBILITY RELATED

SOLUTIONS
Shared Parking Solutions

SHARED OFF - STREET PARKING
• Allows different uses to share parking among adjoining and/or nearby parcels • Example: a coffee shop and a sit-down restaurant can share a significant amount of parking due to different time of day peak demand, morning versus evening • Time Frame: Short Term/Midterm
• Relative Cost: $
Belmont Shore, Trulia Patchogue, NY, Shared Parking
Rendering
Reduce Parking Requirements

REDUCING MINIMUM PARKING

REQUIREMENTS
• Minimum parking requirements may not reflect current and potential parking demand trends
• Tailoring parking requirements to future demand can “right-size” parking for efficient use
• Take advantage of current underutilized parking through the Corridors (potentially including available on-street spaces)
• Time Frame: Short Term/Midterm
• Relative Cost: $ Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd Polling: [Parking Investments] Do you
support flexibility in parking requirements
using shared parking and/or reducing
parking requirements?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
“Park Once” Public Parking Garages

ESTABLISH PUBLIC PARKING LOTS &

GARAGES
• “Park Once” refers to drivers getting access to multiple land uses at once, rather than reparking multiple times for each land use they visit • Public garages/lots can serve activities within a reasonable walking distance, usually a quarter of a mile
• Could be developed to off-set on-street parking removed to support other mobility investments
• In-lieu fee could be implemented to eventually fund a parking facility, but these are high-cost infrastructure investments
• Time Frame: Midterm/Long Term
• Relative Cost: $$/$$$
Downtown Ventura, CA has a “Park Once Strategy” from a 2006 Belmont Shore, Trulia Mobility & Parking Plan
Remove On-Street Parking to Accommodate
other Needs

REDUCING ON - STREET PARKING SPACES
• Removing on-street parking, with the creation of off-street public parking, can assist with freeing up curb space for community needs (e.g. delivery zones, drop-off areas, outdoor dining)
• Could be proposed in tandem with establishing public parking lots & garages to offset parking spaces removed
• Time Frame: Midterm/Long Term
• Relative Cost: $$/$$$
Belmont Shore, Trulia
Polling: [Parking Investments] Do you
support investment in public parking garages
to make curb space available for other uses?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
Pick-up & Drop-off Zones for TNCs and AVs

PICK - UP/DROP - OFF ZONES (FOR

TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES

AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES)
• As the corridors revitalize, demand for curb space near high-activity centers will increase • Having space for TNCs (e.g. Uber/Lyft), AVs (that will likely not need to park), and delivery trucks will be important to serve future need safely and efficiently • Could reconfigure designated rideshare zones if necessary as demand for mobility services evolves over time
• Time Frame: Long Term
• Relative Cost: $
Belmont Shore, Trulia
Streetlet Public Space

STREETLETS ON MACKAY & GREEN LANE
• Conversion of street segments to temporary or permanent open space, protecting space from vehicles using physical barriers
• Provides greater opportunity for public space along the corridor • Can be phased in or temporary
• Timeframe: Midterm/Long Term
• Relative Cost: $$–$$$
Belmont Shore, Trulia
Bike & Mobility Device Parking

PARKING FOR BIKES AND SECONDARY

MOBILTY DEVICES
• Improving bicycle, e-bike and scooter-type infrastructure can encourage nearby residents and visitors to ride bicycles and other mobility devices (e.g. skateboards & scooters) to the area
• Can be created in existing on-street parking spaces
• Timeframe: Short Term/Midterm
• Relative Cost: $ (without curb extensions)–$$ (with curb extensions) Belmont Shore, Trulia
Transit Curb Extensions

POTENTIAL FOR CURB EXTENSION

CONVERSION TO TRANSIT STOPS AND

TROLLEY SERVICE
• As transit service increases along the corridors, existing curb extensions along Artesia Boulevard can be converted into high-quality transit stops • Spaces may need to be offset in off-street facilities • Timeframe: Long Term
• Relative Cost: $$$
Belmont Shore, Trulia
Polling: [Mobility Investments] Do you
support the conversion of on-street parking
spaces for the following reasons?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options [Multiple Allowed]:

Yes, for Pick-up & Drop-off Zones for TNCs and AVs
Yes, for Streetlets
Yes, for Bike & Mobility Device Parking
Yes, for Transit Curb Extensions
No, I do not support under any circumstances
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
Best
Practices
Jurisdictions across
Southern California have
implemented or planned
innovative approaches to
parking management.

INNOVATIVE

PRACTICE
 Review & Adjustment of Parking Standards over time (Santa Ana)  Parking Benefit Districts (Pasadena)
 “Park Once” Shared Parking (Ventura)
 Flexible Curb Space (Hermosa Beach)
 In-Lieu Fees (Santa Monica & Beverly Hills)
 Special Parking Requirements for Certain Uses (Belmont Shore Long Beach)
We researched implemented & proposed best practices in
parking management across Southern California, particularly in nearby coastal cities, along with parking ratios. Below are some of the most applicable programs:

FILL
WITH

PICTURE
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
Best Practices

PARKING MANAGEMENT
Pasadena, Spot Angels
Santa Ana, OC Register Ventura, Fine Art America
Comparing Off-Street Parking Ratios
City Redondo
Beach
Los Angeles
Venice Coastal
Zone
Beverly
Hills Hermosa Beach Long Beach Coastal Zone
Manhattan
Beach Pasadena
Commercial 1 per 250 SF - 1 per 350 SF 1 per 250 SF
to 1 per 333 SF 1 per 200 SF 1 per 200 SF to 250 SF -
Office 1 per 300 SF 1 per 500 SF N/A 1 per 250 SF
to 1 per 333 SF 1 per 250 SF 1 per 300 SF 1 per 333 SF
Medical/Dental
Office
1 per 150 for
medical/dental 1 per 200 SF 1 per 200 SF to
1 per 350 SF
1 per 200 SF to
1 per 333 SF
1 per 250 SF to
1 per 500 SF 1 per 200 SF 1 per 250 SF
Restaurant 1 per 75 SF
1 per 200 SF
(<1,000)
1 per 100 SF
1 per 350 SF
(Business
Triangle)
1 per 50 SF
to 1 per 100 SF 1 per 100 SF 1 per 50 SF 1 per 100 SF
Hotel
1 per room, 1 per
100 SF of
banquet/restaurant
/gathering area
1 per room (first
30)
+ 0.5 per room
(next 30)
+ 0.25 per room
(remaining)
+ 25 per 1,000 SF
meeting rooms or

0.2 per fixed seat
1 per room
1 per room (first
50)
+ 1 per 1.5 rooms
(next 50)
+ 1 per 2 rooms
(remaining)
+ for ancillary uses
according to
respective ratios
1 per room
+ for banquet and
meeting rooms,
restaurants and
gift shops

1.1 per room
+ 1 per 50 SF
+ for ancillary
uses according to
respective ratios
1 space per room + 10
spaces per 1000 SF of
banquet/restaurant/gat
hering area or 1 space
per 8 fixed seats.

COMMERCIAL
For commercial uses, parking
requirements ranged from one parking
space per 200 sq. ft. to 333 sq. ft.

Redondo Beach requires a parking space
per 250 sq. ft.

OFFICE
For office uses, parking requirements
ranged from one parking space per 250
sq. ft. to 500 sq. ft. Redondo Beach
requires a parking space per 300 sq. ft.
and 1 per 150 sq. ft. for medical/dental
office

RESTAURANT
For restaurant uses, parking requirements
ranged from one parking space per 50 sq.
ft. to 350 sq. ft. Redondo Beach requires a
parking space per 75 sq. ft.

LoopNet LoopNet
Belmont Shore Long Beach, CA: Special
Parking Requirements

SPECIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS
• Parking requirements cut in half for many uses
• Does not apply to sit-down restaurant uses
• Includes options for in-lieu fees based on square feet • Considerations:
• Requires setting fee levels that maximize revenue generation without encouraging developers to build on-site parking
• Revenue can be unstable based on economic conditions
Belmont Shore, Trulia
Polling: [Parking Investments] Do you support
adjusting Redondo Beach's off-street parking
ratios to require less parking?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
Santa Ana, CA: 2021 Downtown Parking
Study

REVIEW & ADJUSTMENT OF PARKING

STANDARDS OVER TIME
• Field collection of data is conducted to focus on number of parked vehicles for a specific land use at set time iterations to identify the change in parking demand during a given time period
• A review of the land use operation characteristics is conducted to determine size of the land use and its vacancy rate, and a new rate is determined • Considerations:
• Requires data collection over multiple seasons over time Santa Ana, OC Register
Hermosa Beach, CA: 2019 Parking
Management Study

ONGOING MONITORING & ADJUSTMENTS
• Track curb space utilization throughout different times of day, week, or year and design curb space allocation to meet needs based on observed data (e.g. TNC activity, transit ridership, package delivery, e-scooters, etc.)
• Evaluate and reconfigure designated rideshare zones if necessary as demand for mobility services evolves over time
• Conduct resident, visitor, employee, and employer surveys to evaluate success of rideshare zones
• Consideration:
• Requires data collection over multiple seasons Hermosa Beach,Travel Awaits Polling: [Parking Management] Do you
support dynamic monitoring and
adjustments for parking flexibility?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
Santa Monica & Beverly Hills, CA: In-Lieu
Fees

IN - LIEU FEES
• Developers pay into a parking district fund for future improvements to shared parking (such as public parking structures), instead of building on-site parking • Provides flexibility for developers of some of the smaller parcels in the AACAP • Facilitates shared parking between uses
• Considerations:
• Requires setting fee levels that maximize revenue generation without encouraging developers to build on-site parking
• Revenue dependent on redevelopment occurring
Santa Monica, SMDP
Polling: [Parking Investments] For future
projects, do you support an option to pay
into a municipal parking fund instead of
building parking?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
Pasadena, CA: Parking Benefit Districts

PARKING BENEFIT DISTRICTS
• Parking benefit districts fund public improvements in the places where revenue is generated
• Implemented in Old Town Pasadena, the parking benefit district is often credited with revitalizing the neighborhood
• Public support for controversial measures, such as parking meters, can be greater when the revenue directly benefits the district
• Considerations:
• Requires additional management and administration
• Revenue fluctuates with seasonal demand
Pasadena, Spot Angels
Polling: [Parking Management] Do you
support creating a parking benefit district?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
Polling: [Parking Management] Would you
support parking meters if their funds were
reinvested in the Corridors?
Belmont Shore, Trulia LoopNet, Aviation Blvd
Options:

Do Not Support
Neutral
Support
 Discussed results from the updated
study & identified the need for future
parking supply PARKING
STUDY
BEST

PRACTICES
 Presented best practices from
nearby cities & gathered
feedback on which measures
have the most support
AACAP

MEASURES
 Reviewed parking & mobility
measures from AACAP &
gathered feedback on which
measures have the most support
Conclusion
Next Steps

WORKSHOP OUTCOMES
Belmont Shore, Trulia
• Collect Community feedback/input from this workshop (polling and public comment) & present to City Council early June • Parking Zoning Amendments
• Planning Commission (Summer 2022)
• City Council (Summer/Fall 2022)
FILL
WITH

PICTURE
Questions &
Comments

AACAP PARKING STUDY WORKSHOP

← All documents from this meeting