Cities Index.
eComments CC 7.9.24

Redondo Beach City Council
July 9, 2024

Document
eComments CC 7.9.24
Meeting
July 9, 2024
Body
Redondo Beach City Council
Original file
160 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on redondo.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

City Council on 2024-07-09 6:00 PM - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER Meeting Time: 07-09-24 18:00
eComments Report
Meetings Meeting
Time
Agenda
Items
Comments Support Oppose Neutral
City Council on 2024-07-09 6:00 PM -

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
07-09-24
18:00
73 5 1 1 3
Sentiments for All Meetings
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
City Council on 2024-07-09 6:00 PM - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 07-09-24 18:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
H.5. 24-0425 APPROVE CONTRACTS UNDER $35,000:

1. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

EDISON COMPANY FOR A NEW METER AND SERVICE FOR THE
MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD MEDIAN IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT 2506
MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD #U IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$1,306.32 EFFECTIVE JULY 9, 2024 UNTIL COMPLETED

2. APPROVE A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL,
INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR

THE AVIATION BLVD NORTHBOUND AT ARTESIA BLVD RIGHT TURN LANE PROJECT, JOB NO. 40780, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $27,695 FOR THE TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2025 WITH A ONEYEAR RENEWAL OPTION

3. APPROVE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE FUNDING
AGREEMENT #920000000F5301 WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA)
RECEIVED ON JUNE 17, 2024 FOR THE GRANT AVENUE SIGNAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, JOB NO. 41090 TO EXTEND THE
LAPSING DATE OF THE PROJECT TERM TO FEBRUARY 29, 2024 AT

NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY
1 0 0 1
H.14. 24-1128 APPROVE UPDATES TO THE MASTER FEE
RESOLUTIONS TO REFLECT THE FINAL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR
BUDGET ADOPTION MOTION AND TO SET JULY 10, 2024 AS THE

EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THE FEES THAT DO NOT REQUIRE

ORDINANCE MODIFICATION PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-049, A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-050, A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-051, A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT USER

FEES, AS AMENDED
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-052, A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES

DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED
1 0 1 0
J.1. 24-1113 For eComments and Emails Received from the Public 1 0 0 1 N.1. 24-1156 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING

SELECTION OF A COLOR PALETTE FOR THE NEW CITY LOGO AND

NEXT STEPS FOR LOGO IMPLEMENTATION
2 1 0 1
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for H.5. 24-0425 APPROVE CONTRACTS UNDER $35,000:

1. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR A NEW METER AND SERVICE FOR THE MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD MEDIAN IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT 2506 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD #U IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,306.32 EFFECTIVE JULY 9, 2024 UNTIL COMPLETED

2. APPROVE A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE AVIATION BLVD NORTHBOUND AT ARTESIA BLVD RIGHT TURN LANE PROJECT, JOB NO. 40780, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $27,695 FOR THE TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2025 WITH A ONE-YEAR RENEWAL OPTION

3. APPROVE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE FUNDING AGREEMENT #920000000F5301 WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA) RECEIVED ON JUNE 17, 2024 FOR THE GRANT AVENUE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, JOB NO. 41090 TO EXTEND THE LAPSING DATE OF THE PROJECT TERM TO FEBRUARY 29, 2024

AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY
Overall Sentiment
Grace Peng
Location:

Submitted At: 4:29pm 07-09-24
I just want to remind everyone that both Aviation and Artesia are part of the 2011 South Bay Bicycle Master Plan.

We pledged that, when we worked on each road that was part of the planned network, we would add bicycle infrastructure. The speed limit has crept up to 40 mph in some areas and our automobiles have gained considerable height and weight. Painted bike lanes will not cut it any more. We need hardened protection for pedestrians and cyclists at this intersection.

The geometry of this angled intersection already requires very long length crossings. This is difficult for slower walkers. We should be shortening crossings for pedestrians, not widening the road to lengthen crossings. This intersection is close to two senior residential projects and a daycare center. It is also used by North Redondo students who attend MCHS. The intersection must be made safe for all, but especially the mobility-impaired and those pushing strollers.

Remember, a bicycle lane is a mobility lane. We can add more mobility capacity without inviting more cars. Build protected bike infrastructure and people will use it instead of driving. We don't have to keep widening roads for cars. We can use the existing road space more efficiently, by coaxing people out of cars.

Please direct the design consultant to make the intersection safe for all modes, particularly for the elderly and the young.

Agenda Item: eComments for H.14. 24-1128 APPROVE UPDATES TO THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTIONS TO REFLECT THE FINAL 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET ADOPTION MOTION AND TO SET JULY 10, 2024 AS THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THE

FEES THAT DO NOT REQUIRE ORDINANCE MODIFICATION PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-049, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-050, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-051, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-052, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT USER FEES, AS AMENDED Overall Sentiment
Brianna Egan
Location:

Submitted At: 5:55pm 07-09-24
I think that the Community Development Fee Schedule should be updated to charge a fee (instead of zero dollars) for the administrative design review of single-family home development.

Single-family homes account for the majority of new building permits issued each year in the city (https://housingdata.app/places/CA/Redondo_Beach) so they represent a significant workload for the Community Development Department. The vast majority of these permits issued are for teardowns and remodels. By charging no fee for design review of single-family, we incentivize this type of development over other types of housing options, which leads to developers "mansionizing" homes in neighborhoods.

I think those seeking to mansionize their home (both developers who purchase and resell, and homeowners doing a significant remodel) should be charged a fee for the administrative design review to do so.

Agenda Item: eComments for J.1. 24-1113 For eComments and Emails Received from the Public Overall Sentiment
Brandee Keith
Location:

Submitted At: 5:18pm 07-05-24
Hello! I'm Brandee Keith, Senior Public Affairs Specialist for South Coast AQMD, serving the South Bay Communities. I'd like to share the following news from our agency which may be of interest to the City Council, staff, and residents of Redondo Beach.
• On Friday, August 2, South Coast AQMD will be hosting two important public hearings regarding proposed changes to Rule 1148.1 (Oil and Gas Production Wells), and Proposed Rule 2306 (Freight Rail Yards). Also considered will be Proposed Rule 316.2 – Fees for Rule 2306. These hearings will be held during the monthly governing board meeting at the South Coast AQMD headquarters, in the Dr. William A. Burke Auditorium, at 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. Virtual participation options are also available. Check the South Coast AQMD website for participation details. We encourage everyone to participate and share their input.

Written comments can be submitted through July 30, 2024.

For more information, including key documents pertaining to the hearings, visit the South Coast AQMD website at www.aqmd.gov or contact the Public Information Center at (909) 396-2001. • Save the date for the 10th Annual Environmental Justice Conference, “A Decade of Collaboration for Clean Air.” Join us in-person at Town and Gown of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles on Thursday, October 24, 2024. For more information email [email protected].

Agenda Item: eComments for N.1. 24-1156 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING SELECTION OF A COLOR

PALETTE FOR THE NEW CITY LOGO AND NEXT STEPS FOR LOGO IMPLEMENTATION Overall Sentiment
Brianna Egan
Location:

Submitted At: 6:03pm 07-09-24
I like the simplicity of the color palette option 1 with the cooler tones.

I think after multiple rounds of design and iterations, this is turning out to be a great product for the city that I can see on media, decals, business cards, and the like. The city could also capitalize on this branding by selling official merchandise and developing a slogan.

Grace Peng
Location:

Submitted At: 5:35pm 07-09-24
I like the graphical simplicity of the circular logo. I am referring to the options on N.1. Blue Folder Option 3 https://redondo.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=13105100&GUID=9565C34D-4B62-4BAB-979B6DB112070CC2 I like the clear yellow of Alternate Yellow 5
The expense of printing in more colors adds up over time.

We can adopt a one-color logo like option 14.

When we want to splash out, we can use a 2 color scheme like option 21, but substitute a clear yellow like in option 5.

I want to thank the graphical designer and the ad hoc committee for their hard work.

This logo looks so crisp and professional.

← All documents from this meeting