BLUE FOLDER ITEM
Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 23, 2024
J.1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
• PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
From: Soheila Mirmiran
To: CityClerk
Date: Sunday, July 21, 2024 9:25:48 PM
CAUTION: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.
I GO TO SLEEP EVERY NIGHT FEELIN' TRAUMATIZE, THEY SAY OCCUPATION
TRYING TO HIDE THAT ITS A GENOCIDE,
I JUST WISH A KID COULD UP TO SEE HIS MAMMA,
WISH THAT I COULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT BOMBS DROPPED ON GAZA , HURTS SO BAD TO KNOW WHERE DO MY TAX DOLLARS GO????,
MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD, POOR YOUNG SOUL,
ALL HE KNEW WAS LOVE,
THE WHOLE WORLD GO BLIND,
TURNS TO SILENCE ,
WHILE I 'M SAYING ,
FREE
PALASTINE FRIM THE TYRANTS!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: Stop BCHD
To: CityClerk; Planredondo; Planning Redondo; Sean Scully; Kevin Cody; [email protected]; Nils Nehrenheim; Todd Loewenstein; Paige Kaluderovic; Zein Obagi; Scott Behrendt; [email protected]; rlundy@healthlaw.com; Garth Meyer Subject: Public Comment - Planning Commission: FAR for Public Land Use Date: Thursday, July 18, 2024 1:21:37 PM
CAUTION: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.
On behalf ofStopBCHD.com, I provide the following comment into the Council and Draft General Plan update records:
0.75 FAR is appropriate for Public Land Use. We agree with the initial City finding that for most Public land uses, a maximum 0.75 FAR (proportion of the development sqft to the overall lot sqft) is appropriate. 0.75 FAR is greater than the surrounding explicit or imputed FARs on most public land, especially single family residential.
1.25 FAR is appropriate for limited City-owned Public Land. We also agree with the initial City finding that two City-owned sites that can provide services nearly exclusively for City residents and taxpayers should be allowed a 1.25 FAR. Because this is a Redondo Beach General Plan, the appropriate consideration for Public land use should be the benefit to Redondo Beach residents and taxpayers. This is not a regional plan.
BCHD is falsely claiming it has been downzoned. The District condemned the Prospect site for the benefit of the residents who reside within the District according to its Superior Court sworn statements. The District is exclusively Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach that voter-authorized the District and funded it throughout the years.
Prior to the State’s requirement to have objective planning standards, Public sites were limited only by the Planning Commission’s vote. State requirements for objective standards require upfront, measurable standards, not the use of the Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s pornography standard (I know it when I see it).
BCHD is rapidly becoming a District public agency in name only. The proposed use for the BCHD Public land is to develop for a supermajority of non-resident use with the Healthy Living Campus with a private developer and 95 year land lease. allcove is a regional, 91% non-resident service area operation that BCHD is required to operate and fund for 30 years by BCHD contract with the State.
Assisted Living will be a 100% privately owned PMB LLC facility for 80% nonresident tenants of 90254, 90266, 90277 and 90278 per BCHD’s MDS consultant report.
PACE (medical adult daycare) will be 95% non-resident enrollees, as the National PACE Association data shows that only 1 in 1000 seniors uses PACE, and that implies only 17 District residents. BCHD’s investment banker is planning a facility for 400 enrollees.
BCHD will bring 5% to 20% District benefits and 80% to 95% Redondo Beach damages with its development. I urge you to limit BCHD’s FAR to the earlier proposed 0.75 FAR to protect Redondo Beach residents from excessive, nonresident, commercial development by BCHD on public land. --
StopBCHD.com ([email protected]) is a Neighborhood Quality-of-Life Community concerned about the quality-of-life, health, and economic damages that BCHDs 110-foot above the street, 800,000 sqft commercial development will inflict for the next 50-100 years.
Our neighborhoods have been burdened since 1960 by the failed South Bay Hospital project and have not received the benefit of the voter-approved acute care public hospital since 1984.Yet we still suffer 100% of the damages and we will suffer 100% of the damages of BCHDs proposal.
From: Stop BCHD
To: CityClerk; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; rlundy@healthlaw.com; info; Garth Meyer; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Public Comment: Planning and City Council - BCHD Plans to Service 80% to 95% NON-RESIDENTS on P-CF land -
JUST LIKE A COMMERCIAL COMPANY WOULD
Date: Wednesday, July 17, 2024 10:46:38 PM
Attachments: image.png
CAUTION: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.
--
StopBCHD.com ([email protected]) is a Neighborhood Quality-of-Life Community concerned about the quality-of-life, health, and economic damages that BCHDs 110-foot above the street, 800,000 sqft commercial development will inflict for the next 50-100 years. Our neighborhoods have been burdened since 1960 by the failed South Bay Hospital project and have not received the benefit of the voter-approved acute care public hospital since 1984.Yet we still suffer 100% of the damages and we will suffer 100% of the damages of BCHDs proposal.
From: Stop BCHD
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; info; Los Angeles County District Attorney"s Office; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Kevin Cody; [email protected]; Garth Meyer; [email protected]; CityClerk; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Public Comment All Agencies - BCHDs Failure to Provide allcove Services to Disadvantaged and Health Care Professional Shortage Area Date: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 12:07:44 PM
Attachments: Slide3.PNG
Slide4.PNG
image.png
CAUTION: Email is from an external source; Stop, Look, and Think before opening attachments or links.
Over 80% of allcove BCHDs participants are from RB/HB/MB/Torrance/"Other" - while Disadvantaged Communities and Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas get less than 15% of allcove services. THAT'S UNFAIR. THAT'S ALSO A POTENTIAL LIABILITY TO BCHD Taxpayers if the State audits BCHD and claws back the funding. While we can never know the intent of BCHDs Board's expansion into 80% to 95% non-resident services - we can surmise that BCHD expanded its allcove service area to win a funding award. BCHD added 1.2M population to the Health District for allcove, apparently in order to secure some Disadvantaged Communities, Lower Income Areas, Non-white Areas, and Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (MHPSAs) and score more points on the funding evaluation. BUT WHEN THE RESULTS ARE IN - BCHD SPENT THE FUNDING ON RELATIVELY HIGH INCOME, RELATIVELY WHITE AREAS WITH AMPLE MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS. MHPSAs and Disadvantaged communities carried the day for BCHD's funding request - yet - BCHDs threw them crumbs. The BCHD Board has failed and opened District taxpayers to financial liability.
PROVIDED BY BCHD AS THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AS OF JUNE 4 2024 19:38 WHEN BCHD EMAILED IT. --
StopBCHD.com ([email protected]) is a Neighborhood Quality-of-Life Community concerned about the quality-of-life, health, and economic damages that BCHDs 110-foot above the street, 800,000 sqft commercial development will inflict for the next 50-100 years. Our neighborhoods have been burdened since 1960 by the failed South Bay Hospital project and have not received the benefit of the voter-approved acute care public hospital since 1984.Yet we still suffer 100% of the damages and we will suffer 100% of the damages of BCHDs proposal.