FMFW v1.15a - 2015
EXHIBIT G
FMFW v1.15a - 2015
EXHIBIT G
Subrecipient Monitoring Instrument
Subrecipient Monitoring Instrument
PROJECT TITLE
Los Angeles County State Homeland Security Program
Monitoring Reports
A. FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Objective
To determine that the Subrecipient implemented corrective action to address findings noted in its Single Audit that is related to the Homeland Security Grant.
Verification Yes No Comment
1. Was a Single Audit completed for Grant Year 2014-15
and 2015-16?
2. If yes, did the Subrecipient forward a copy to the
Homeland Security Grant Administrator (HSGA) by
March 30th of the year following the audit?
3. Did the Single Audit(s) identify findings related to the Homeland Security Grant? If yes, please continue.
If no, please mark N/A and continue to Section B.
4. Did the Subrecipient develop a corrective actionplan that addresses the finding(s)?
5. Did the Subrecipient send a copy of a corrective action plan to the HSGA?
6. Did the Subrecipient implement the corrective action plan?
EXHIBIT H
B. TRAINING
Objective
To determine that the Training expenditures were appropriately documented and that the activities aligned with the project’ s goals and objectives. If the Training activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Training expenditures using employee timecards, sign-in sheets, and certificates of training. If the Training activities involved using consultants or contractors, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement procedures to hire the consultants or contractors. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Training
expenditures? If yes, then continue. If no, continue
to next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient receive prior approval from
the State either via email or other documentation
and did it include the training course name and
number?
3. If the Training expenditures relate to the use of
employees, did the Subrecipient appropriately
document the Training expenditures using employee
timecards, sign-in sheets and certificates of training?
4. If Training expenditures relate to the use of
consultants/contractors, did the Subrecipient follow
proper procurement procedures to hire the consultants
or contractors?
5. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the Training
expenditures in their accounting records?
6. For Projects with overtime expenditures for Training:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee timecards
to appropriately document the overtime expenditures?
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the overtime
expenditures in their accounting records?
EXHIBIT H Page 2 of 11
B. TRAINING (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
7. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Training:
a. Does the Subrecipient have documentation that
the backfill expenditures were approved by the
State?
b. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
backfill expenditures using employee timecards and
sign-in sheets?
c. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
expenditures in their accounting records?
8. Were employee timecards utilized in Training activities signed and dated by the employee and direct supervisor?
9. Were the Training expenditures consistent with the State approved grant award and/or post award modification(s)?
10. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports submitted by HSGA:
a. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report
finding was resolved, explain resolution, and indicate
such in the current report as resolved.
b. If the Project prior Grant Year report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved and
what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior
year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 3 of 11
C. PLANNING
Objective
To determine that the Planning expenditures were appropriately documented and that the activities aligned with the project’s goals and objectives. If the Planning activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Planning expenditures using employee timecards and sign-in sheets. If the Planning activities involved using consultants or contractors, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement policies. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Planning
expenditures? If yes, continue. If no, continue to
next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
Planning expenditures providing copies of the
support documentation that indicated the efforts
made to produce the final product and a copy of
the product produced?
3. If Planning expenditures relate to the use of employees, did the Subrecipient use employee timecards and
sign-in sheets?
4. If Planning expenditures relate to the use of
consultants/contractors, did the Subrecipient
follow proper procurement procedures to hire
the consultants or contractors?
5. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
Planning expenditures in their accounting records?
6. For Projects with overtime expenditures for
Planning:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee
timecards to appropriately document the
overtime expenditures?
EXHIBIT H
C. PLANNING (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
overtime expenditures in their accounting
records?
7. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Planning:
a. Does the Subrecipient have documentation
that the backfill expenditures were approved
by the State?
b. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document
the backfill expenditures using employee
timecards and sign-in sheets?
c. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
backfill expenditures in their accounting
records?
8. Were the employee timecards utilized in Planning
activities signed and dated by the employee and
direct supervisor?
9. Were the Planning expenditures consistent with the
State approved grant award and/or post award
modification(s)?
10. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected area of
noncompliance that remain outstanding and were
reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring
reports submitted to HSGA:
a. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report
finding was resolved, explain resolution, and
indicate such in the current report as resolved.
b. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report
finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been
resolved and what the Subrecipient is doing to
resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in
the current report.
EXHIBIT H
D. EQUIPMENT
Objective
To determine that the project Equipment expenditures are supported by invoices and that a listing of the Equipment/property is maintained by the Subrecipient. To determine that the purchases are aligned with the project’s goals and objectives. Use Worksheets 2 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Equipment
expenditures? If yes, continue. If no, continue to
next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient maintain invoices to support
the Equipment expenditures?
3. Did the Subrecipient follow proper procurement
procedures to purchase the Equipment and were
the items listed in the federal “Authorized
Equipment List” and/or “Standardized Equipment List”?
4. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the
Equipment expenditures in their accounting records?
5. Did the Subrecipient maintain an Equipment
inventory that listed the following:
a) Description of Equipment,
b) Serial number or other identification number,
c) AEL number,
d) Fund/source/grant year,
e) Title holder,
f) 100 percent of federal participation. If no, then identify percentage, g) Acquisition date,
h) Acquisition cost,
i) Quantity,
j) Equipment location,
k) Use and condition of Equipment,
l) Disposal date and sale price of the Equipment
6. Did the Subrecipient conduct an inventory of
Equipment purchased with Cal/OES grant funds at
least once every two years?
EXHIBIT H
D. EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
7. Was the Equipment physically inspected to ensure:
a. The Equipment existed and agreed to inventory
listing?
b. The Equipment worked and adequately trained
staff are available to operate the Equipment?
8. Did the Subrecipient maintain Equipment in a secure
location?
9. For property other than Equipment, i.e. supplies, did the Subrecipient have controls and accountability to
safeguard and ensure that the items are used and
solely for authorized purposes?
10. For Equipment disposal, if any:
a. Was the disposition consistent with federal
regulations?
b. What is the status of the proceeds received from the disposal?
11. Did the Subrecipient have a policy for damaged,
destroyed, lost or stolen Equipment including but
not limited to informing the Cal/OES, steps to replace the Equipment and an investigative process?
12. Were the Equipment expenditures consistent with
State approval grant award and/or post award
modification(s)?
13. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports maintained by HSGA:
a. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding was resolved, explain resolution, and indicate such in
the current report as resolved.
b. If the project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved
and what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H
E. EXERCISE
Objective
To determine that the Exercise expenditures were appropriately documented and the activities align with project’s goals and objectives. If the Exercise activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Exercise expenditures using timecards and sign-in sheets. If the Exercise activities involved using consultants or consultants, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement procedure. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Exercise
expenditures? If yes, continue. If no, continue to
next section.
2. Did the Subrecipient receive prior approval from the State either via email or other documentation and did it include the Exercise course name and number?
3. If the Exercise expenditures relate to the use of employees, did the Subrecipient appropriately document the Exercise expenditures using employee timecards, sign-in sheets, and certificates for Exercise?
4. If the Exercise expenditures relate to the use of consultants/ contractors, did the Subrecipient follow proper procurement procedures to hire the consultants or contractors?
5. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the Exercise
expenditures in their accounting records?
6. For Projects with overtime expenditures for Exercise:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee timecards
to appropriately document the overtime expenditures?
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the overtime
expenditures in their accounting records?
c. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the backfill
expenditures in their accounting records?
7. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Exercise:
a. Does the Subrecipient have documentation that
the backfill expenditures were approved by the State?
b. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
backfill expenditures using employee timecards and
sign-in sheets?
EXHIBIT H
E. EXERCISE (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
8. Were the employee timecards utilized in the Exercise activities signed and dated by the employee and direct supervisor?
9. Were the Exercise expenditures consistent with the State approved grant award and/or post award modifications?
10. Ensure the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports:
a. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding was resolved, explain resolution and indicate such in
the current report as resolved.
b. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved and what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H
F. ORGANIZATION
Objective
To determine that the Organization expenditures were appropriately documented and that the activities align with the project’s goals and objectives. If the Organization activities involved employees, determine if the Subrecipient appropriately documented the Organization expenditures using employee timecards and sign-in sheets. If the Organization activities involved using consultants or contractors, determine if the Subrecipient followed the appropriate procurement policies. Use Worksheets 1 and 3 (See Attachment E – Subrecipient Monitoring Worksheets).
Verification Yes No Comments
1. Did the Subrecipient receive funding for Organization expenditures? If so, continue. If no, continue to next section.
2. If the Organization expenditures relate to the use of employees, did the Subrecipient document the expenditures using employee timecards, sign-in sheets, or with other support documentation that substantiated the expense?
3. If the Organization expenditures relate to the use of consultants or contractors, did the Subrecipient follow proper procurement procedures to hire the consultants
or contractors?
4. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the Organization expenditures in their accounting records?
5. For Projects with overtime expenditures for Organization:
a. Did the Subrecipient maintain employee timecards to
appropriately document the overtime expenditures?
b. Did the Subrecipient accurately report the overtime
expenditures in their accounting records.?
EXHIBIT H
F. ORGANIZATION (Continued)
Verification Yes No Comments
6. For Projects with backfill expenditures for Organization:
b. Does the Subrecipient have documentation that the
backfill expenditures were approved by the State?
c. Did the Subrecipient appropriately document the
backfill expenditures using employee timecards and
other payroll documentation?
7. Were employee timecards utilized in Organization activities signed and dated by the employee and direct supervisor?
8. Were the Organization expenditures consistent with the State approved grant award and/or post award modification(s)?
9. Ensure that the Subrecipient corrected areas of noncompliance that remain outstanding and were reported as findings in prior Grant Year monitoring reports maintained by HSGA:
a. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding was resolved, explain resolution and indicate such in the current report as resolved.
b. If the Project prior Grant Year monitoring report finding is not resolved, indicate why it has not been resolved and what the Subrecipient is doing to resolve the prior year finding and indicate such in the current report.
EXHIBIT H Page 11 of 11