Agenda packet — Redondo Beach City Council, November 12, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Tuesday, November 12, 2024
415 DIAMOND STREET, REDONDO BEACH

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER

THE CITY COUNCIL HAS RESUMED PUBLIC MEETINGS IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE IN-PERSON, BY ZOOM, eCOMMENT OR EMAIL.
4:30 P.M.- CLOSED SESSION- ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
6:00 P.M.- OPEN SESSION- REGULAR MEETING
City Council meetings are broadcast live through Spectrum Cable, Channel 8, and Frontier Communications, Channel 41 and/or rebroadcast on Wednesday at 3 p.m. and Saturday at 3 p.m. following the date of the meeting. Live streams and indexed archives of meetings are available via internet. Visit the City’s official website at www.Redondo.org/rbtv.

TO WATCH MEETING LIVE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE:
https://redondo.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
*Click "In Progress" hyperlink under Video section of meeting TO WATCH MEETING LIVE ON YOUTUBE:
https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofRedondoBeachIT
TO JOIN THE MEETING VIA ZOOM (FOR PUBLIC INTERESTED IN SPEAKING.

OTHERWISE, PLEASE SEE ABOVE TO WATCH/LISTEN TO MEETING):

Register in advance for this meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_1BDHQuYZQlaUfjSy-DrgJg After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

If you are participating by phone, be sure to provide your phone # when registering. You will be provided a Toll Free number and a Meeting ID to access the meeting. Note; press # to bypass Participant ID. Attendees will be muted until the public participation period is opened.

When you are called on to speak, press *6 to unmute your line. Note, comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker.
eCOMMENT: COMMENTS MAY BE ENTERED DIRECTLY ON THE WEBSITE AGENDA PAGE:
https://redondo.granicusideas.com/meetings
1) Public comments can be entered before and during the meeting. 2) Select a SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEM to enter your comment; 3) Public will be prompted to Sign-Up to create a free personal account (one-time) and then comments may be added to each Agenda item of interest.
4) Public comments entered into eComment (up to 2200 characters; equal to approximately 3 minutes of oral comments) will become part of the official meeting record. 1 EMAIL: TO PARTICIPATE BY WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, EMAILS MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE 3:00 P.M. THE DAY OF THE MEETING (EMAILS WILL NOT BE READ OUT LOUD): Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the posted agenda received after the agenda has been published will be added as supplemental materials under the relevant agenda item. Public comments may be submitted by email to [email protected]. Emails must be received before 3:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to ensure Council and staff have the ability to review materials prior to the meeting. 4:30 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION - ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. SALUTE TO FLAG AND INVOCATION
D. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS - ADDITIONAL BACK UP MATERIALS
Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

E. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS
This section is intended to provide members of the public with the opportunity to comment on Closed Session Items or any subject that does not appear on this agenda for action. This section is limited to 30 minutes. Each speaker will be afforded three minutes to address the Mayor and Council. Each speaker will be permitted to speak only once. Written requests, if any, will be considered first under this section.

F. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
F.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Greg Kapovich, Waterfront & Economic Development Director Jon Goetz - Redwood Public Law
PROPERTY:
555 North Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: 7503-008-901)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:

Kevin Ketchum - Port Royal Marina, LGW Investments, LLC UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Lease Status, Price, and Terms

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

F.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
2 Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Greg Kapovich, Waterfront & Economic Development Director PROPERTY:
100 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
102 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
108 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
110 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
112 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
120 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
122 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
124 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
134 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
136 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
138 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
140 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
142 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
150 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
160 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
164 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: 7505-002-932)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:

Patricia McKinsey, Concord Property Management
International Boardwalk Tenants
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Price

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

F.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Greg Kapovich, Waterfront & Economic Development Director PROPERTY:
123 West Torrance Blvd #201, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
Pier Plaza (a portion of APN: 7505-003-206)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:

Brian Campbell - BC Urban, LLC
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Lease Status and Terms

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

F.4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed 3 Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Diana Trejo v. County of Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles; City of Redondo Beach, and DOES 1 to 25
Case Number: 23TRCV01219
F.5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

City of Redondo Beach, et al. v. California State Water Resources Control Board Case Number: 20STCP03193
F.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC and Leonid Pustilnikov v. City of Redondo Beach and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach
Case Number: 22TRCP00203
F.7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, et al.

Case Number: 23STCP00426
F.8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:
9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCP02189
F.9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

In re 9300 Wilshire LLC
Bankruptcy C.D. Cal. Case Number: 2:23-bk-10918-ER
4 F.10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Yes in My Back Yard, a California nonprofit corporation; SONJA TRAUSS, an individual v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, and DOES 1 through 25 inclusive Case Number: 23TRCP00325
F.11. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCV10146
F.12. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND LABOR NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Sec. 54957.6.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS:

Management and Confidential Bargaining Unit
CONTACT: DIANE STRICKFADEN, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES G. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
H. ROLL CALL
I. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
J. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING
6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION - REGULAR MEETING
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. SALUTE TO THE FLAG AND INVOCATION
D. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
E. APPROVE ORDER OF AGENDA
F. AGENCY RECESS
G. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS - ADDITIONAL BACK UP MATERIALS
5 Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

G.1. For Blue Folder Documents Approved at the City Council Meeting H. CONSENT CALENDAR
Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Mayor or any City Council Member may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Mayor will call on anyone wishing to address the City Council on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Council for discussion. Each speaker will be permitted to speak only once and comments will be limited to a total of three minutes.

H.1. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.2. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING

OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.3. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:

A. JUNE 18, 2024 ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETING
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEMAND
CHECK 116802-116804 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,242,761.40
CONTACT: STEPHANIE MEYER, INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.5. APPROVE A HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 SOUTH BROADWAY BEGINNING NOVEMBER 12, 2024 FOR A TERM OF TEN YEARS AND AUTOMATIC RENEWAL EVERY YEAR

THEREAFTER UNLESS TERMINATED
CONTACT: MARC WIENER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
H.6. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1 SUBDIVISIONS OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR

CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3282-24, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE

REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING 6 RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3283-24, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN

IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR

CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.

CONTACT: MARC WIENER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
H.7. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3284-24, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REDONDO BEACH ORDINANCE NO. 2922-03 TO INCREASE THE ASSESSMENT

AMOUNT LEVIED AGAINST BUSINESSES WITHIN THE RIVIERA VILLAGE

BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

I. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
J. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
This section is intended to provide members of the public with the opportunity to comment on any subject that does not appear on this agenda for action. This section is limited to 30 minutes. Each speaker will be afforded three minutes to address the Mayor and Council. Each speaker will be permitted to speak only once. Written requests, if any, will be considered first under this section.

J.1. For eComments and Emails Received from the Public
K. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
This section is intended to allow all elected officials the opportunity to reveal any disclosure or ex parte communication about the following public hearings
L. PUBLIC HEARINGS
M. ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS AGENDAS
N. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION PRIOR TO ACTION
N.1. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE CITY’S DRAFT CANNABIS

REGULATORY ORDINANCE

PROVIDE DIRECTION ON THE APPLICATION SCORING AND SELECTION

PROCESS SECTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
O. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
7 P. MAYOR AND COUNCIL ITEMS
Q. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REFERRALS TO STAFF
R. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
R.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Kevin Ketchum - Port Royal Marina, LGW Investments, LLC UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Lease Status, Price, and Terms

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

R.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Greg Kapovich, Waterfront & Economic Development Director PROPERTY:
100 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
102 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
108 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
110 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
112 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
120 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
122 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
124 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
134 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
136 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
138 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
140 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
142 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
150 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
160 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
164 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: 7505-002-932)
8 NEGOTIATING PARTIES:

Patricia McKinsey, Concord Property Management
International Boardwalk Tenants
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Price

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

R.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Brian Campbell - BC Urban, LLC
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Lease Status and Terms

GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DIRECTOR
CONTACT:

R.4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Diana Trejo v. County of Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles; City of Redondo Beach, and DOES 1 to 25
Case Number: 23TRCV01219
R.5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

City of Redondo Beach, et al. v. California State Water Resources Control Board Case Number: 20STCP03193
R.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC and Leonid Pustilnikov v. City of Redondo Beach and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach
9 Case Number: 22TRCP00203
R.7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, et al.

Case Number: 23STCP00426
R.8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:
9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCP02189
R.9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

In re 9300 Wilshire LLC
Bankruptcy C.D. Cal. Case Number: 2:23-bk-10918-ER
R.10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Yes in My Back Yard, a California nonprofit corporation; SONJA TRAUSS, an individual v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, and DOES 1 through 25 inclusive Case Number: 23TRCP00325
R.11. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCV10146
R.12. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND LABOR NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Sec. 54957.6.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
10 Mike Witzansky, City Manager
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS:

Management and Confidential Bargaining Unit
CONTACT: DIANE STRICKFADEN, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES S. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
T. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the City Council of the City of Redondo Beach will be an Adjourned Regular meeting to be held at 4:30 p.m. (Closed Session) and a Regular meeting to be held at 6:00 p.m. (Open Session) on Tuesday, November 19, 2024, in the Redondo Beach City Hall Council Chamber, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California. 11 Administrative
Report
F.1., File # 24-1730 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
TITLE
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Kevin Ketchum - Port Royal Marina, LGW Investments, LLC UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Lease Status, Price, and Terms

Page 1 of 1 ends

12 Administrative
Report
F.2., File # 24-1771 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
TITLE
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Patricia McKinsey, Concord Property Management
International Boardwalk Tenants
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Price

Page 1 of 1 ends

13 Administrative
Report
F.3., File # 24-1791 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
TITLE
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Brian Campbell - BC Urban, LLC
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Lease Status and Terms

Page 1 of 1 ends

14 Administrative
Report
F.4., File # 24-1798 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Diana Trejo v. County of Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles; City of Redondo Beach, and DOES 1 to 25 Case Number: 23TRCV01219

Page 1 of 1 ends

15 Administrative
Report
F.5., File # 24-1820 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

City of Redondo Beach, et al. v. California State Water Resources Control Board Case Number: 20STCP03193

Page 1 of 1 ends

16 Administrative
Report
F.6., File # 24-1821 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC and Leonid Pustilnikov v. City of Redondo Beach and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach
Case Number: 22TRCP00203

Page 1 of 1 ends

17 Administrative
Report
F.7., File # 24-1822 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, et al.

Case Number: 23STCP00426

Page 1 of 1 ends

18 Administrative
Report
F.8., File # 24-1823 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Page 1 of 1 ends

19 Administrative
Report
F.9., File # 24-1824 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

In re 9300 Wilshire LLC
Bankruptcy C.D. Cal. Case Number: 2:23-bk-10918-ER

Page 1 of 1 ends

20 Administrative
Report
F.10., File # 24-1825 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Page 1 of 1 ends

21 Administrative
Report
F.11., File # 24-1826 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCV10146

Page 1 of 1 ends

22 Administrative
Report
F.12., File # 24-1807 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
TITLE
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND LABOR NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Sec. 54957.6.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS:

Management and Confidential Bargaining Unit

Page 1 of 1 ends

23 Administrative
Report
G.1., File # 24-1780 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
TITLE
For Blue Folder Documents Approved at the City Council Meeting

Page 1 of 1 ends

24 Administrative
Report
H.1., File # 24-1781 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
TITLE

APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH )

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations indicated below.

Legislative Body City Council
Posting Type Adjourned & Regular Agenda
Posting Locations 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 ü Adjacent to Council Chambers
Meeting Date & Time November 12, 2024 4:30 p.m. Closed Session 6:00 p.m. Open Session
As City Clerk of the City of Redondo Beach, I declare, under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below.

Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk
Date: November 8, 2024

Page 1 of 1 ends

25 Administrative
Report
H.2., File # 24-1782 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
TITLE

APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ALL

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA

Page 1 of 1 ends

26 Administrative
Report
H.3., File # 24-1783 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
TITLE
APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:

A. JUNE 18, 2024 ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETING

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approval of Council Minutes
APPROVED BY:

Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk

Page 1 of 1 ends

27 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 1 ends

Minutes
Redondo Beach City Council
Tuesday, June 18, 2024
Closed Session - Adjourned Regular Meeting 4:30 p.m.

Open Session –Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.
4:30 PM - CLOSED SESSION – ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
A. CALL TO ORDER
An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Redondo Beach City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Mayor Light in the City Hall Council Chambers, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California.

B. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Behrendt, Kaluderovic, Loewenstein, Nehrenheim (arrived at 4:32 p.m.), Obagi, Mayor Light
Officials Present: Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Lucie Colombo, Chief Deputy City Clerk
C. SALUTE TO THE FLAG - NONE
D. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS – ADDITIONAL BACK UP MATERIALS
Chief Deputy City Clerk Colombo announced there were no Blue Folder Items for Closed Session.

E. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS AND NONAGENDA ITEMS There were no public communications on Closed Session items and non-agenda items.

F. RECESS TO CLOSED – 4:35 p.m.

Chief Deputy City Clerk Colombo read title to the items to be considered in Closed Session.

City Manager Witzansky announced that the following would be participating in Closed Session: City Manager Mike Witzansky, City Attorney Mike Webb, Assistant City Attorney Cheryl Park, Interim Community Services Director Elizabeth Hause, Deputy Community Services Director Kelly Orta and Outside Legal Counsels Abby O’Brient, Jon Welner and Kenton Moore.
28 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 2 ends

Motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Kaluderovic, and approved by voice vote to recess to Closed Session at 4:35 p.m.

Motion carried, 5-0.

F.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND LABOR NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Sec. 54957.6.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Diane Strickfaden, Director of Human Resources
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS:

Redondo Beach Firefighters Association
F.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.

AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Elizabeth Hause, Interim Community Services Director
PROPERTY:
309 Esplanade, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:

Made by Meg - Meg Walker
UNDER NEGOTIATION:

Both Price and Terms
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, INTERIM COMMUNITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
F.3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

City of Redondo Beach, a California Charter City; City of Carson, a California Charter City; City of Torrance, a California Charter City; City of Whittier, a California Charter City; City of Del Mar, a California Charter City v. Rob Bonta, in his official capacity as California Attorney General, State of California; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 22STCP01143
29 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 3 ends

F.4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Rosenda Ramirez Clark v. City of Redondo Beach, et al.

Case Number: 21STCV00584
F.5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

In re 9300 Wilshire LLC
Bankruptcy C.D. Cal. Case Number: 2:23-bk-10918-ER
F.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:
9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCP02189
F.7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive Case Number: 23STCV10146
F.8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, et al.

Case Number: 23STCP00426
30 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 4 ends

F.9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA, LLC and Leonid Pustilnikov v. City of Redondo Beach and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach
Case Number: 22TRCP00203
F.10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

City of Redondo Beach, et al. v. California State Water Resources Control Board
Case Number: 20STCP03193
F.11. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Yes in My Back Yard, a California nonprofit corporation; SONJA TRAUSS, an individual v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, and DOES 1 through 25 inclusive
Case Number: 23TRCP00325
F.12. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

Silas Dettelbach by Guardian Ad Litem, Berna Dettelbach, individually and Spencer Dettelbach, individually v. City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Case Number: 24TRCV01457
Motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, and approved by voice vote, to continue Closed Session to Thursday, June 20, 2024 at 4:30 p.m.

Motion carried, 5-0.

G. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – 6:00 p.m.
31 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 5 ends

Mayor Light reconvened to Open Session at 6:00 p.m.

H. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Behrendt, Kaluderovic, Loewenstein, Nehrenheim, Obagi, Mayor Light
Officials Present: Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Lucie Colombo, Chief Deputy City Clerk
I. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
City Manager Witzansky reported that under Item No. F.12, City Council offered unanimous authorization to the City Attorney to defend the City.

J. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Light adjourned to the Regular meeting at 6:00 p.m. 6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION - REGULAR MEETING
A. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Redondo Beach City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Light in the City Hall Council Chambers, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California.

B. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Behrendt, Kaluderovic, Loewenstein, Nehrenheim, Obagi, Mayor Light
Officials Present: Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Lucie Colombo, Chief Deputy City Clerk
C. SALUTE TO THE FLAG AND INVOCATION
Mayor Light invited Veterans to stand and recognized them for their service.

Abigail, sixth grader, Adams Middle School, led in the salute to the flag.

Mayor Light called for a moment of silence.
32 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 6 ends

D. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
D.1. MAYOR’S COMMENDATION TO SOUTH REDONDO AYSO REGION 34 BOYS U10 TEAM FOR WINNING THE WESTERN STATES CHAMPIONSHIP Mayor Light recognized South Redondo AYSO Region 34 Boys U10 Team for winning the Western States Championship and presented Team Members with commendations.

D.2. MAYOR’S PROCLAMATION OF JUNE 19, 2024 AS JUNETEENTH IN

REDONDO BEACH
Mayor Light presented a Proclamation in recognition of June 19, 2024 as Juneteenth Day in Redondo Beach.

Councilmember Nehrenheim discussed the recent District 1 community meeting; thanked Public Works and Athens for the recent compost-giveaway event; announced Family Camp Night at Wilderness Park this coming weekend, the Riviera Village Summerfest on Friday, June 21, 2024 and the Riviera Village Firecracker Fun Run on July 4, 2024.

Councilmember Loewenstein reported the District 2 community meeting will take place online June 26, 2024 from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Interim Community Services Director, Elizabeth Hause, will be joining.

Councilmember Kaluderovic spoke about Shakespeare by the Sea events on July 13, 2024 at Dominguez Park and on July 14, 2024 at Veterans Park.

Councilmember Obagi congratulated RBPD and RBFD for the recent active shooter drill that took place at the high school.

Councilmember Behrendt announced the District 5 community meeting will be on June 25, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. at the Redondo Beach Performing Arts Center; also announced the upcoming Bicycle Rodeo event hosted by RBPD will be on June 29, 2024 at the Annex.

Mayor Light reported attending the 1-year anniversary of the Redondo Beach Community Garden; thanked Public Works for the harbor dredging project; thanked RBPD Chief Hoffman for the work on Palos Verdes Boulevard dealing with truck traffic and working with CHP; spoke about participating in a panel session of the South Bay Association of Realtors.

E. APPROVE ORDER OF AGENDA
Motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, 33 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 7 ends

and approved by voice vote, the order of the agenda, as presented.

Motion carried, 5-0.

F. AGENCY RECESS – None
G. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS – ADDITIONAL BACK UP MATERIALS
G.1 For Blue Folder Documents Approved at the City Council Meeting City Clerk Manzano reported Blue Folder Items include H.5, H.21, J.1, L.2 and L.3.

Motion by Councilmember Kaluderovic, seconded by Councilmember Loewenstein, and approved by voice vote, to receive and file Blue Folder Items.

Motion carried, 5-0.

H. CONSENT CALENDAR
H.1. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2024
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.2. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER

READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.3. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: NONE
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.4. PAYROLL DEMANDS
CHECKS 29769-29798 IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,173.43, PD. 6/7/24 DIRECT DEPOSIT 279579-280204 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,213,969.16, PD. 6/7/24
EFT/ACH $447,857.33, PD. 6/6/24 (PP2410)

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEMANDS
CHECKS 114482-114730 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,016,780.54
REPLACEMENT DEMAND 114481
CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.5. This item was pulled from Consent by Councilmember Loewenstein for 34 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 8 ends

separate discussion.

H.6. APPROVE THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH KIM

FUENTES FOR PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $45,000 AND THE TERM JULY 1, 2024 TO JUNE 30, 2027
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, INTERIM COMMUNITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
H.7. APPROVE THE SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE AND FULL RECONVEYANCE

OF THE RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM LOAN LIEN THAT IS IN PLACE ON 2415 GRANT AVE, REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, INTERIM COMMUNITY SERVICES

DIRECTOR
H.8. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR A TOTAL OF $104,597 AND RETAIN THE CITY ENGINEER’S AUTHORIZATION LIMIT OF 25% FOR FUTURE

CHANGE ORDERS FOR COMPLETION OF THE ANITA STREET AT PACIFIC

COAST HIGHWAY TO MARIA AVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS (WESTBOUND CHANNELIZATION) PROJECT, JOB NO. 41240
CONTACT: ANDREW WINJE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
H.9. ADOPT BY 4/5 VOTE AND BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-043,

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A 2023-2024 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET MODIFICATION TO APPROPRIATE $185,221 IN CALRECYCLE SENATE BILL (SB) 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS TO THE

SOLID WASTE INTERGOVERNMENTAL GRANTS FUND
CONTACT: ANDREW WINJE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
H.10. APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A POLICE DEPARTMENT F-550 UTILITY

VEHICLE FOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
TRANSPORTATION FROM EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC. FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $320,812
CONTACT: ANDREW WINJE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
H.11. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-044, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

LEASING CERTAIN PROPERTY TO EL CINCO DE MAYO MEXICAN FOOD LLC
35 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 9 ends

APPROVE A LEASE WITH EL CINCO DE MAYO MEXICAN FOOD LLC FOR THE PREMISES AT 240 FISHERMAN’S WHARF FOR THE TERM JUNE 18, 2024 TO JUNE 17, 2029
CONTACT: GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT & ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
H.12. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-045, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, LEASING CERTAIN PROPERTY TO WATERFRONT PIZZERIA, INC.

APPROVE A LEASE WITH WATERFRONT PIZZERIA, INC. FOR THE
PREMISES AT 203 FISHERMAN’S WHARF FOR A MONTH-TO-MONTH TERM STARTING JUNE 18, 2024
CONTACT: GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT & ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
H.13. APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH MELAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW SERVICES FOR AN ADDITIONAL $27,000 AND A NEW TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $57,000
CONTACT: MARC WIENER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
H.14. APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH BOWMAN INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS LTD. FOR BUILDING PLAN CHECK
REVIEW SERVICES FOR AN ADDITIONAL $90,000 AND A NEW TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $110,000 FOR THE EXISTING TERM THROUGH APRIL 1, 2028
CONTACT: MARC WIENER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
H.15. ACCEPT THE ANNUAL FIRE INSPECTION COMPLIANCE REPORT

FULFILLING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IN CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION CC-2406-046, A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT BY THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH FIRE CHIEF REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ANNUAL

INSPECTIONS OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3
CONTACT: PATRICK BUTLER, INTERIM FIRE CHIEF
36 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 10 ends

H.16. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-047, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.17. APPROVE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT HALF, INC. FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE TWO

TEMPORARY COMPUTER TECHNICIANS FOR THE INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $25,000 FOR THE EXISTING TERM THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024
APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT HALF, INC. FOR STAFF

AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE TWO TEMPORARY ASSISTANT

PLANNERS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $34,999 FOR THE TERM JULY 1, 2024 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2024

APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT HALF, INC. FOR STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES TO PROVIDE A TEMPORARY

ACCOUNTING CLERK FOR THE FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $20,000 AND TO EXTEND THE TERM TO DECEMBER 31, 2025
CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.18. APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE TAX WAIVER APPLICATION

SUBMITTED BY THE RIVIERA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION EXEMPTING

VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN THE RIVIERA VILLAGE SUMMER FESTIVAL

EVENT FROM COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUSINESS LICENSE TAX RATES ESTABLISHED IN REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 6-1.22, AS PER SECTION 6-1.08 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE.

CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.19. This item was pulled from Consent by Councilmember Nehrenheim, for separate discussion.

H.20. RECEIVE AND FILE THE MONTHLY UPDATE TO THE TWELVE-MONTH STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 30, 2023
CONTACT: MIKE WITZANSKY, CITY MANAGER
37 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 11 ends

H.21. APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROJECT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CITYGATE ASSOCIATES, LLC. TO UPDATE THE CONSULTING

STAFF ASSIGNED TO REDONDO BEACH TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN

COMPANY PERSONNEL AND INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF THE
CONTRACT BY $4,880.88
CONTACT: LUKE SMUDE, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
There were no public comments on the Consent Calendar.

Councilmember Nehrenheim pulled H.19 from Consent for separate discussion and commented on leases in the harbor.

Councilmember Loewenstein pulled H.5 from Consent for separate discussion.

Motion by Councilmember Kaluderovic, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, and approved by voice vote, the Consent Calendar, as presented except for H.5 and H.19 which were pulled for separate discussion.

Motion carried, 5-0.

City Clerk Manzano read titles to Resolution No. CC-2406-043, CC-2406-044, CC2406-045, CC-2406-046 and CC-2406-047.

I. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
H.5. APPROVE CONTRACTS UNDER $35,000:

1. APPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE OPERATION AGREEMENTS WITH THE

CITIES OF HERMOSA BEACH, MANHATTAN BEACH AND EL SEGUNDO FOR THE OPERATION OF BEACH CITIES TRANSIT LINE 109 AT NO COST TO THE CITY FOR THE TERM JULY 1, 2024 TO JUNE 30, 2025

2. APPROVE A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH

SYNCROMATICS CORPORATION TO PROVIDE AUTOMATED BUS

ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEMS AND RELATED SOFTWARE SETUP FOR BEACH CITIES TRANSIT FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $22,610 AND TO EXTEND THE TERM TO JUNE 30, 2027

3. APPROVE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH COOK, HAMMOND AND KELL, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL TRANSIT GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICES FOR AN ADDITONAL AMOUNT OF $5,000 AND TO EXTEND THE TERM TO JUNE 30, 2027

4. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LOVEJOY FOUNDATION, INC., A

CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, FOR
38 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 12 ends

ANIMAL SHELTERING AND DEAD ANIMAL DISPOSAL SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 PER YEAR FOR THE TERM JUNE 18, 2024 TO JUNE 17, 2025, WITH AUTOMATIC RENEWAL FOR TWO

SUBSEQUENT ONE-YEAR TERMS

5. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH FLYING LION, INC. FOR THE PROVISION OF DRONE SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $34,999 FOR THE TERM JUNE 18, 2024 TO JUNE 17, 2025

6. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY RESEARCH

ASSOCIATED WITH A POTENTIAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
ISSUANCE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $33,750 FOR THE TERM JUNE 18, 2024 TO DECEMBER 31, 2024

7. APPROVE AN ENGAGEMENT LETTER WITH FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR MUNICIPAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATED TO

FINANCIAL CALCULATIONS PERTAINING TO A POTENTIAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND MEASURE IN 2024 AND PREPARATION OF A TAX

RATE STATEMENT FOR THE BALLOT, IF REQUESTED BY THE CITY, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $9,750 FOR THE TERM JUNE 18, 2024 TO DECEMBER 31, 2024
CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Councilmember Loewenstein mentioned he has a question for the City Manager regarding Item H-5.

While waiting for the City Manager to return, Mayor Light moved to Item No. H.19.

Councilmember Nehrenheim spoke about H.19 basically being the calendar for city commissions and wanted the community to be aware the dates have changed for the process. Councilmember Nehrenheim reported that, usually, commission applications are received in June, interviews are in July, Council provides its recommendations in August, and the Mayor makes appointments in early September; noted this year, applications are due in mid-July and the schedule has moved approximately one month ahead and urged residents to apply.

City Clerk Manzano reported 29 applications have been received so far and noted the application period has been extended due to some of the commissions being consolidated.

City Attorney Webb added that staff is aiming for July 9, 2024 for City Council to consider which commissions may be consolidated, in the event that makes a difference as to which commissions people want to apply for.

In response to Councilmember Kaluderovic’s question regarding the number of 39 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 13 ends

Youth Commission applications received, City Clerk Manzano reported that Recreation collects applications for the Youth Commission.

There were no public comments on this item.

Motion by Councilmember Kaluderovic, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, and approved by voice vote, to approve Item No. H.19.

Motion carried, 5-0.

Mayor Light returned to Item No. H.5.

Councilmember Loewenstein addressed City Manager Witzansky regarding the engagement letter with Fieldman Rolapp and Associates; spoke about ensuring an underwriter for the bond and that an adequate RFI or RFP needs to be rolled out.

City Manager Witzansky clarified this step is the preliminary valuation to help validate the initial assessment but if Council pursues the ballot measure then there will be time to make those selections.

There were no public comments on this item.

Motion by Councilmember Lowenstein, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, and approved by voice vote, to approve Item No. H.5.

Motion carried, 5-0.

Mayor Light moved to Item No. J.

H.19. APPROVE REVISED CITY COMMISSION APPLICATION DEADLINES FOR NEW TERMS DUE TO COMMISSION CHANGES, AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City Council set Friday, July 19, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. as the deadline for receiving applications (http://www.redondo.org/commissionapp) for appointment to City Commissions; and

2. That a notice regarding all vacancies be published in the official newspaper of the City of Redondo Beach, posted at City Hall’s bulletin board outside near the Council Chambers and on the City’s website; and

3. That a meeting be scheduled on Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. to interview applicants for vacant positions; and

4. That Councilmembers submit their recommendations for appointment to the Mayor by Wednesday, August 28, 2024; and
40 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 14 ends

5. That the Mayor make Commission appointments at the Regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, September 3, 2024 at 6:00 p.m.; and

6. That the City Clerk administer the Oath of Office to new and returning Commissioners at the regular City Council Meeting of Tuesday, September 17, 2024 and that the City Clerk schedule a Commissioners’ orientation to be held on Monday, September 30, 2024.

CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
J. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
J.1 For eComments and Emails Received from the Public
Mayor Light opened public participation on non-agenda items.

Sydnee Singer recapped her potential solutions for the eBike issues she presented at a recent City Council meeting; spoke about ordinances in Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach and the possibility of modeling the City’s ordinance accordingly; presented 45 pages of comments made by Redondo Beach residents on Nextdoor about eBikes; commented on the need to find solutions to the problem and urged City Council to make a difference in the community and do something.

Motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, and approved by voice vote to receive and file the 45 pages of comments made by Redondo Beach residents on Nextdoor regarding eBikes submitted by Sydnee Singer.

Motion carried, 5-0.

Councilmember Behrendt announced that the RBPD is enforcing eBike laws; noted that what is occurring with BB guns and fireworks is illegal; reported that Council takes these incidents very seriously and thanked Sydnee Singer for bringing the issue to Council’s attention.

Eugene Solomon, speaking on his own behalf, referenced the bond discussion Council had last week; reported part of the discussion involved $50 million for acquisition of open space and urged Council to include it in the bond issue for several reasons including the acquisition of the AES site, which is an opportunity for investment within the City to generate tens of millions of dollars in future revenue; mentioned it involves local control in terms of Police and Fire; talked about the Green Bay Packers being owned by the residents of that City and felt when citizens of the City pay their property taxes, they are becoming shareholders in the acquisition of such a site. He urged City Council to think of this as an investment that citizens are making to acquire the open space so that they can control what is built.

In reply to Councilmember Obagi’s question regarding reason that this investment 41 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 15 ends

should be done in November versus waiting until March, Eugene Solomon stated the City can authorize all of it in the ballot measure but does not need to fund all of it at the same time. He added that Council could do it as two separate bond issues, but he would not recommend doing so.

City Clerk Manzano reported receiving one eComment.

There were no other public comments.

Mayor Light closed public participation on non-agenda items.

K. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Nehrenheim reported speaking with Athens Services regarding Item L.1 and on Items L.2 and L.3, he spoke with the Mayor, Councilmember Loewenstein, staff and the public.

Councilmember Loewenstein reported speaking, regarding Item L.2 and L.3, with Councilmember Nehrenheim, the Mayor and the public.

Regarding Items L.2 and L.3, Councilmember Kaluderovic reported speaking with the Mayor, staff and the public.

Councilmember Obagi reported speaking with Councilmember Behrendt and the Mayor regarding Items L.2 and L.3.

Councilmember Behrendt reported speaking with the Mayor and staff regarding L.1, and regarding L.2 and L.3, he spoke with the Mayor, staff, Councilmember Obagi and the public.

Mayor Light reported speaking with the City Manager regarding Item L.1 and Councilmember Behrendt and regarding L.2 and L.3, the City Manager, the public and all Councilmembers independently.

L. PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES INC., DBA

ATHENS SERVICES, PROPOSED SOLID WASTE CHARGES AND FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-048 A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CONTRACTOR’S CHARGES AND CORRESPONDING CITY

FEES FOR RESIDENTIAL, MULTIFAMILY, AND COMMERCIAL REFUSE COLLECTION FOR THE 2024-2025 FISCAL YEAR AND ORDERING THE ANNUAL REFUSE CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 TO BE
42 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 16 ends

COLLECTED ON THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TAX ROLL
PROCEDURES:
a. Open the Public Hearing,
b. Take Testimony,
c. Close the Public Hearing; and
d. Adopt by Title Only Resolution No. CC-2406-048
CONTACT: ANDREW WINJE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, and approved by voice vote, to open the public hearing.

Motion carried, 5-0.

Public Works Director Winje introduced the item and Senior Management Analyst Andrea Delap and deferred to her for a report.

Senior Management Analyst Delap narrated a PowerPoint presentation with details of the Administrative Report.

Public Works Director Winje added that confirmation is needed by the City Clerk that there is no majority protest.

Councilmember Nehrenheim commented favorably regarding the service provided by Athens Services; spoke about touring one of their facilities; discussed State legislation relative to solid waste and talked about Athens’ process in separating waste streams; mentioned how they continue to work at improving diversion rates.

City Clerk Manzano reported receiving one eComment regarding the matter.

There were no other public comments.

Motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim, seconded by Councilmember Loewenstein, and approved by voice vote, to close the public hearing.

Motion carried, 5-0.

City Clerk Manzano reported receiving two protests before the public hearing and that, during the meeting no protests were received; she noted approximately 8,236 protests needed to fail, the protests received demonstrates the number received is manifestly less than one-half of the parcels served by the City, with respect to the fee, which is the subject of the protest.

Motion by Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim to adopt by title only Resolution No. CC-2406-048.
43 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 17 ends

Councilmember Nehrenheim wondered if there is a need to include the information read into the record by the City Clerk into the motion.

Brief discussion followed regarding whether Council needs to reopen the public hearing to include the information, provided by the City Clerk about the number of protests received.

Substitute motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim to reopen the public hearing to receive and file the information presented by the City Clerk.

Public Works Director Winje explained the City Clerk needs to confirm there was no majority protest after closure of the public hearing so the process was done correctly.

Councilmember Nehrenheim withdrew the Substitute motion.

The motion carried 5-0.

City Clerk Manzano read title to Resolution No. CC-2406-048.

L.2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

PROPOSED BUDGET, FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM,

AND ASSOCIATED BUDGET RESPONSE REPORTS
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-054, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
PROCEDURES:
a. Reconvene the Public Hearing, take testimony;
b. Close the Public Hearing;
c. Receive and file the Budget Response Reports; and
d. Adopt by title only Resolution No. CC-2406-054, including approval of Budget Response Report Nos. 1 and 56.

CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, and approved by voice vote, to reconvene the public hearing and take testimony.

Motion carried, 5-0.

City Manager Witzansky introduced the item and narrated a PowerPoint presentation of the proposed FY 2024-25 Budget Response Reports including a budget corrections and adjustments that resulted in a $13,000 reduction in the unallocated fund balance, a summary of the proposed budget, reserves, a General Fund budget 44 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 18 ends

summary and recommended actions.

Mayor Light invited public comments.

Lina Carillo, President, Redondo Beach Professional and Supervisory Association (RBPSA), referenced Decision Package (DP) 63 relative to a proposed increase in pay range to the Water and Economic Development Manager of $30,000; mentioned the pay plan for PSA positions is part of their MOU and that changes in the MOU need to be discussed with RBPSA; reported they did not find out about the changes until the release of the budget and Decision Packages; asserted that PSA does not support DP 63 because the proposed changes were not vetted through them; provided a history of the position and listed reasons the PSA does not support it.

Additionally, she spoke about a disconnect between what the City expects and what the job market demands and noted PSA employees remains under market.

Motion by Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, and approved by voice vote, to extend Lina Carillo’s time by 30 seconds.

Motion carried, 5-0.

Lina Carillo, President, RBPSA, reiterated that PSA does not support adjusting its pay plan in their MOU if Council implements the change approved in DP 63 and urged Council to either hire at the same salary as approved in the MOU or produce a different solution.

City Manager Witzansky expressed surprise; stated the sequence was clear, that the duties were modified to contemporize the duties; reported the City went out for recruitment and the recruitment did not result in qualified candidates and reported this is a simple DP to adjust the classification to make it more competitive in the market and recruit someone that will provide value to Waterfront. He added that he had not received any concerns from the RBPSA and will need to follow up on the item; indicated he is unsure as to their concerns; reported the City cannot implement until it moves forward with the job specification so the idea would be that Council would approve the budget to set it aside but will not take action on the position until Council concludes the meeting for process.

City Attorney Webb confirmed that if Council is only setting the budget aside, it is not changing the MOU.

In response to Councilmember Obagi’s question regarding how the City Manager determined an extra $30,000 was necessary to make the position competitive; City Manager Witzansky reported reviewing comparable agencies as well as the needs of the department and what skill set was needed to fill the position. He discussed the job duties, provided a brief history of the position, and its uniqueness and indicated that the position needed to be adjusted accordingly and not based on the previous person that held it; he stated he looks forward to meeting with RBPSA and discussing 45 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 19 ends

the matter further.

City Clerk Manzano reported receiving one eComment on this matter.

There were no other public comments.

Councilmember Kaluderovic offered a motion to approve DP 4 with an increase to the annual parking meter permit to $350 per year, which is keeping in line with surrounding areas and noted that the fee in Hermosa Beach is $250 per month or $3,000 per year.

Mayor Light took a straw poll and Councilmembers Nehrenheim and Loewenstein were opposed.

Councilmember Obagi noted that he and Councilmember Behrendt considered setting the fee as high as $500 but indicated he would like to hear from the Police Chief.

Councilmember Loewenstein suggested hearing the motions first to get to a common agreement and to determine the impacts; more discussions ensued.

Councilmember Obagi suggested asking Staff more questions to clarify the motions; discussion followed regarding the process for reviewing and approving Decision Packages.

Councilmember Obagi mentioned that part-time staff positions are offered $20 per hour currently and the City is proposing a Decision Package to change the rate range to $17 to $19 per hour; noted the minimum wage in Los Angeles County for fast-food workers is being changed to $20 per hour; he wondered why the City is proposing a change that will not make the position competitive with fast-food workers; commented on receiving emails about the topic and suggested expanding the range to $20 or $21 per hour.

Councilmember Loewenstein explained the law applies to fast-food workers of companies that have a certain number of locations and a lot of the smaller fast-food establishments still pay minimum wage.

Councilmember Obagi talked about it being indicative of the market.

City Manager Witzansky reported Staff has no problem expanding the range as long as the City can operate in the programming and within budget.

Interim Community Services Director Hause explained that staff wanted to at least, get into competitive range with nearby cities and the private sector but noted wanting to avoid an issue with compression internally, meaning they need to avoid hiring staff that potentially will make the same as their supervisors; staff would need to go back 46 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 20 ends

and analyze the entire gamut of the City’s part-time schedule.

Councilmember Obagi continued the discussion asking if the City would advertise at $17 per hour and if that did not produce good candidates, would they then advertise it at incremental increases and expressed concerns about time being wasted by that process; stated he does not want staff to be hamstrung when it advertises the position at $17-$18 per hour since he wants the after school programs to start benefitting the residents sooner than later.

City Manager Witzansky reminded Council it is setting budget aside for the range increases; reported Staff will need to return with resolutions to implement the proposed pay changes; noted that as long as the budget has increased sufficiently and Staff can have some latitude in how it hires, the City will find a way to operate within its total structure. He added that when Staff returns with the resolutions they will determine if the ranges can be stretched in some of the target areas.

Councilmember Nehrenheim referenced BRR 1, particularly as it relates to the updates to the Fire Department on a number of positions; he mentions approvals are made for positions and budgeting is based on the maximum amount of money on those positions but they are not updated across the board; expressed concerns that for the last five or six years, the same number of civilian personnel is shown when the department does not have the same number of civilian personnel.

City Manager Witzansky reported it was a unique situation; he explained that there were two things happening in this situation; the money was included in the budget for the positions that were appropriated, which included the Emergency Preparedness Coordinator in the Fire Department’s budget but because the classification for that position has not yet been added to the books of class specs for HR it was not recognized in their org chart or in their control figure; he further clarified there was one position short in the organizational chart, but not in the budget.

In further response to Councilmember Nehrenheim’s question, City Manager Witzansky reported the position is not filled as Staff still needs to create the classification and job spec. He added it was a mid-year action item, and they were busy with some other endeavors; reported this BR will show that the position count will be at 70 and Staff will still need to return with a spec but they will have that opportunity moving forward.

Councilmember Kaluderovic distributed copies of her recommendations to fellow Councilmembers, the Mayor and Staff; reported that she wants to prioritize the Police shooting range as her number one CIP this year; referenced a quote in her recommendations of what is needed for the City to get to a level of acceptable or competitive application; noted it must include a third-party evaluation cost; stated that evaluations are based on the level of design so any less progress on a design potentially weakens the accuracy of a third-party cost estimate. She added the proposal will be evaluated based on its evidence to commence construction within 47 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 21 ends

12 months of funding. She reported that the grant application closed last week and that funding is awarded in September; speculated that, if the City were to apply next year, funding would be awarded by September 2025 and construction would need to commence by September 2026; pointed out this is an opportunity to complete a project in a relatively short amount of time and with Federal funding; again mentioned this will rebuild the shooting range and the Public Works yard.

Councilmember Kaluderovic noted that the estimated cost for the project is over $17 million; stated the City would need to cover the soft costs such as engineering, planning, design, environmental NEPA; her motion is to carry over existing costs of $543,984; reminded everyone that last year, Council took out over $1 million from this CIP to fund other projects; felt that if the bond measure should pass in November for a public facilities improvement, that the $500,000 allocated to Police and Fire Station improvements be redirected back to the Police Station shooting range to restore the needed funds to complete and be competitive with the grant. Additionally, she reported receiving an email from a resident who was at an event at Towers Elementary with her daughter and started hearing shooting. It so happens that she was a freshman at Columbine in 1999 and was terrified; Councilmember Kaluderovic stressed this is a quality-of-life issue that should be top priority for the City.

Councilmember Kaluderovic circled back to her proposal to increase the annual parking meter permit fee to $350 per year and wanted to confirm what kind of additional impact that would have on the General Fund.

RBPD Chief Hoffman reported that currently parking permit fees are generating approximately $176,000 per year in revenue based on 1600 permits purchased; added that if the fee were raised to $200 per year it would translate to $320,000 per year in revenue and by increasing it to $350 per year, it would generate a total of $560,000 a year in revenue.

Councilmember Obagi asked if there is a basis for determining that the same number of people will buy a parking permit if the fee is increased from $110 to $350 per year and Chief Hoffman reported that increasing the fee could, theoretically, cause people to feel it is not worth buying a permit at the increased cost.

Brief discussion followed regarding the number of parking citations issued per year.

Councilmember Behrendt liked the idea of increasing the fee to $350 from a revenuegenerating perspective; expressed concerns it may be outside the “sweet spot” and asked RBPD Chief Hoffman for his thoughts regarding whether to increase the fee as proposed or take a graduated approach.

RBPD Chief Hoffman reported DP 4 recommends an increase to $200 but noted it is up to City Council to decide.

Councilmember Kaluderovic confirmed that Manhattan Beach charges $27 per 48 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 22 ends

month, but only for Matlock parking, which is $324 per year; noted Hermosa Beach charges $250 per month or $3,000 per year; stated that Torrance and El Segundo have residential permits only and asserted that the suggested $350 per year is competitive and reasonable.

Councilmember Obagi added there is a different rate for employees and Councilmember Kaluderovic reported no change and keeping the suggested rate of $70 for employee parking.

In terms of DP 6, Councilmember Kaluderovic agreed to accept the proposed increases with additional increases for after-school registration fees; she suggested raising it to $300 per month for the first child and $225 for a second child; explained that in looking at other programs, they charge $700+ and $500+; noted raising the fee to $300 is still very competitive; spoke about raising the fee for increased capacity and more staffing; addressed Aviation fees; felt the City should be in the mid-ranges with its fees and listed the large gym at Aviation at $175, the small gym at $150, the dance room at $75 and increasing the Alta Vista tennis center prices by $4 across the board, which would represent an $80,000 increase. She added that all the recommendations for DP 6 would increase the revenue generated on top of what was proposed for DP 6 by $220,229.

In reply to Councilmember Behrendt’s question, Councilmember Kaluderovic confirmed that “comparable” refers to the after-school program at Redondo Beach CDC at $517 and the Redondo Beach right at school at $599. Relative to BRR 19, she reported discussing it with the City Manager and the City may only increase parking meters ¼ this year due to the Coastal Commission and reported the proposal is to increase it to $1.75 per hour this year and another $0.25 next year.

Councilmember Obagi commented on the impact reviewed by Finance Director Collazo and noted it was updated to $289,922 as opposed to $386,000.

City Manager Witzansky reported it is due to the delayed implementation and staff will need to adjust the ordinance, which will take a couple of months.

Councilmember Kaluderovic agreed with the allocation for the Alta Vista resurfacing project, the rubberized surfacing at Dale Page Park, suspending the holiday parking for the month of December until reinstated and noted updated numbers for BRR 44.

Councilmember Obagi reported that number at $37,500.

In terms of the concealed carry weapon fee, Councilmember Behrendt confirmed it at $500 with a resulting revenue of $12,350.

Regarding stand-by Police services, Councilmember Kaluderovic suggested a fee of $21,200.
49 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 23 ends

Councilmember Obagi suggested $21,000 and Councilmember Kaluderovic agreed.

Additionally, Councilmember Kaluderovic agreed with the proposed addition of two part-time Municipal Service Officers and the Path of History markers; recommended rejecting the consultant for future ambulance contracts since the Staff report indicated it is not needed for 18 months and could be done during the next budget cycle; discussed renovations of dormitories at Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 at $189,000 and reported that if the bond passes the money can be redirected back to the shooting range for the necessary soft costs that will need to be covered by the City.

Regarding BRR 51, Councilmember Kaluderovic recommended allocating $500,000 for the design and build of an all abilities playground at Franklin Park from the Subdivision Park Trust; explained she is prioritizing this over the others, as there are 56 units (36 units at the Foundry and 20 units at Anastisi) that just came online in that neighborhood, generating over $1.2 million in Quimby Funds; stated priority should be given first to neighborhoods that are impacted by the development, and then go from there. Furthermore, she suggested amending the allocation to Wilderness Park to $450 and pickleball to $360, which would use up all of the available Quimby Funds and recommended approval for the John Parsons Public Art Fund allocation and the Pier peak daytime custodial part-time staff hours.

Councilmember Kaluderovic recommended rejecting DP 25 ($145,000 for increased tree trimming); noted this is contract work and not increases in materials or staff time; reported there are six DPs that are increasing the Street Landscaping and Lighting District Fund, and voters rejected the increase in assessment; asserted this is contrary to what the voters wanted and felt the City should go by that.

In response to Councilmember Obagi’s question regarding the tree trimming budget, Public Works Director Winje confirmed that tree-trimming services are provided by a contractor, West Coast Arborists, every year; reported the City carries a certain amount of core dollars in its annual budget; stated more is added every year, based on upcoming services of the grid that will be trimmed in that particular year; indicated the target number of trees this year is 428,000 to be trimmed compared to previous years that hovered around 240,000 to 280,000, so more money is needed; noted he would like to move the added costs into the core as it is an on-going expense for anticipated maintenance; he would like it added to next year’s DP. He addressed the City’s tree trimming grid and schedule; felt the City would have to reduce services in Grid 2 and Grant Avenue; talked about exposing the City to increased liability if trees remain untrimmed; reported that during this fiscal year, there was a reduction from what staff asked last year; adding that staff asked WCA to do a more moderate cutting and reported the same is anticipated for next year.

Councilmember Loewenstein explained the reason Councilmember Nehrenheim and he did not vote for an increase last year was because there was no competitive bid process.
50 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 24 ends

Councilmember Obagi asked whether that has now been cured and Public Works Analyst Osborne reported the City is finishing year five of what was originally a fouryear contract and Council extended for a second four-year period.

Councilmember Loewenstein confirmed that Council voted to extend that contract but there was no competitive bid process at the time.

In reply to Councilmember Obagi’s question as to whether the City can survive without the $145,000, Public Works Director Winje believed there would be additional calls for service that the City will need to respond to; stated it could end up being overtime for the City’s crew or a special call out for work, at a higher rate, by WCA.

Councilmember Obagi noted this is the age of climate change; talked about the winds getting stronger and the weather being more extreme, and indicated it will not be beneficial to have lots of loose, long limbs out there.

Councilmember Kaluderovic stated one of the reasons she thought to propose this was to demonstrate to residents the need to increased costs to the City and why it is necessary to adjust the street landscaping and lighting assessment; felt if they do not feel the pressure of the need, they would vote “no” all the time. She referenced BRR 55 and recommended fully funding of the 27 locations identified as needing crossing guards and appropriating $135,000 from the General Fund.

Councilmember Nehrenheim reported that a couple of years ago, the City had to increase the tree trimming contract more than $150,000 because it instituted a leaf blower ban and wondered if the City will get a discount for that since electric leaf blowers are allowed.

Public Works Analyst Osborne reported that when the 10% increase occurred, the vendor advised that pricing was adjusted as their price was originally based on the ability to use leaf blowers, which was taken away and staff has not discussed a decrease since Council allowed the use of electric leaf blowers.

Councilmember Nehrenheim suggested requesting a 10% decrease since there will be less people and less time required with the use of electric leaf blowers.

Public Works Director Winje clarified that the contract projected for this coming year was $576,000, that Staff’s request is for $428,000 and that WCA is not driving the request; noted Staff is trying to give a lower number that meets the City’s goals of protecting the public, the City and the City tree health.

Councilmember Behrendt referenced BRR 20 relative to the allocation of $80,000 for a consultant and asked for the City Manager’s opinion.

City Manager Witzansky reported the City is going to need those funds, eventually; stated his initial thought was that the City would not need them until the following 51 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 25 ends

fiscal year, but there would not be anything to prevent the City from starting that work now, if that is a Council priority. He stated that staff went through this exercise about 10 years ago with in-house personnel; reported the City is not the ultimate decision maker but it is the County’s which will be deciding on the City’s behalf; felt a consultant is a good idea and believed the City can wait for the appropriation for a fiscal year.

RBFD Interim Fire Chief Butler felt there is time but that it is important to set money aside to begin to look at all of the aspects of the matter; spoke about consultants specializing in EMS fees and transports; reported the contract would come up in 2026 and did not think there is urgency to get that money right now.

City Manager Witzansky guessed that this will be recommended for inclusion in the next fiscal year’s budget.

Councilmember Nehrenheim commented on doing event services in-house; spoke about added bandwidth with the hiring of the Emergency Coordinator and reported there is a blueprint from last time.

RBFD Interim Chief Butler reported that getting into the payer mix of the City would be challenging; adding that it would involve dealing with types of insurance and such, and that they would not use that kind of money but talked about receiving several sample documents from other Fire Chiefs with bigger departments that their staff have created. He talked about needing information such as what the City’s population looks like graphically; added that Torrance is similar in size to Redondo Beach and can use it that one; reported the City would have two ambulances and they would peak staff on other times when they are needed.

Councilmember Nehrenheim stated that two ambulances would require two EMT personnel, 24 hours a day, seven days a week and wondered where they would be housed.

RBFD Interim Chief Butler agreed that would be a challenge; stated they could be “shoe-horned in” or the City could make schedules so that nobody sleeps at the station; added there are models like that but felt it would be better for the City to be able to keep these hires in-house and not contracted.

Councilmember Kaluderovic talked about allocating $30,000 from the General Fund to the Ito Family Open Space as a proper CIP project with the first steps to design and install three information signs; then made a motion to bring back a discussion regarding possibly increasing TOT tax, increasing sales and use tax and exploring an increased assessment for the street landscaping and light district.

Councilmember Obagi commented on the goal of the suggestions being to get funding for the Police shooting range and asked if funding has been added for it. 52 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 26 ends

Councilmember Kaluderovic responded that she reallocated money, should a bond pass in November; allocated $250,000 for Police and $250,000 for Fire improvements and noted nothing is being pulled from the General Fund; should a bond pass for facilities those funds should go towards the police shooting range.

Councilmember Obagi wondered why the bond would not capture the funding needed for the shooting range, both Fire Stations, Public Works, the Police Department and the Annex ($5 million).

Councilmember Kaluderovic felt the public would rather have the Federal government pay for shooting range improvements.

Councilmember Obagi posed what would happen if the City does not get a waiver from the Secretary of the Air Force.

Councilmember Kaluderovic responded that the City will still need to improve the shooting range and would have to produce $5 million one way or another.

Councilmember Obagi reiterated his suggestion to include the entire $5 million in the public safety bond.

In reply to Mayor Light’s question as to whether this was in the survey, City Manager Witzansky reported the shooting range was not part of last week’s discussion; noted Staff will work with FM3 on the questionnaire and has the ability to target some of that information if the City chooses.

Councilmember Kaluderovic noted the City has high level numbers in terms of the costs for a modular shooting range being $5.4 million; reported it is still under the umbrella of public safety infrastructure so if the bond were to specify, “Public safety infrastructure”, that would cover it.

In reply to Councilmember Nehrenheim’s question about when the City should expect the waiver from the Air Force, Councilmember Kaluderovic stated she does not have a hard timeline; she stated the City must apply first and go through the application process before that happens and noted applications are due in June next year; explained the City must apply first and advocate for a waiver; felt the City has a strong case; reported the City must establish a need of National Security in order to get a waiver; asserted there is interest from the Air Force and from the Navy; announced the Department of Homeland Security will tour the site next week and spoke about being in talks with the Coast Guard to visit and has spoken to Assemblymember Ted Lieu’s office who offered to write a letter of support; strongly noted the City needs to be ready to apply and commit.

Councilmember Kaluderovic stated that this proposed budget would result in a General Fund balance of $620,000.
53 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 27 ends

Regarding BRR 38, Mayor Light noticed that Wilderness Park camping fees are increasing substantially, where it is already expensive; claimed many potential campers are being turned away; mentioned part of the problem is in paying overnight staff fees in renting the whole park overnight plus other fees; it is discouraging people from camping at that site. Mayor Light goes on to mention the fee is $850 to stay overnight and felt Council should discuss the item, further. He stated group camping fees are all it is attracting but expressed concerns with families having to pay a $450 camping fee for a weekend in addition to the overnight rates.

City Manager Witzansky responded to clarify the situation at Wilderness Park; he stated that the City used to have a policy where an individual paid an individual overnight camping fee, and the City would close the gates in the evening and staff would leave the premises; those who were there on a reservation basis could remain camping overnight. Several years ago, a youth vandalized and set fire to the camping grounds; after that incident there was concern and fire policies were revisited for Wilderness Park, in particular the notion of leaving residents in a locked facility; safety protocols were implemented to provide for the City to provide an overnight staff attendant that would be paid for by campers where individual campers would have to pay the overnight fee or it would be shared among the various parties staying overnight. He added that Council could choose to subsidize the overnight attendant on weekends, increase the individual camping fees and adjust the program, but the key was to have an overnight staff attendant to help with the facility supervision and, potentially, emergency response.

Interim Community Services Director Hause clarified the $450 only covers staff costs.

In response to Mayor Light’s question about the possibility of reviewing the policy after budget discussions, City Manager Witzansky confirmed that staff could provide a policy discussion and make adjustments to protocols later and stated that if the City, for example, were to budget for an overnight staff attendant for every weekend of the summer, from Memorial Day to Labor Day, the City would need part-time appropriation to cover that type of cost. He added that fee modifications do not require 4/5 Council action.

Finance Director Collazo noted the General Fund balance should be less $13,887 as Councilmember Kaluderovic started with $89,000.

City Manager Witzansky confirmed that the starting position was $60,000 and change, not $89,000.

Councilmember Loewenstein distributed copies of his recommended budget motion; noted agreement with a lot of Councilmember Kaluderovic’s budget recommendations; reported there is a surplus in the end but not by raising parking permit fees.

Councilmember Nehrenheim mentioned that last year he and Councilmember 54 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 28 ends

Loewenstein proposed an increase of $150 for parking permits but was never included in the budget motion; he used an example of one household with two cars at $350 would be $700 per year; noted that would be excessive for people on the edge and stated $150 would still allow the City to balance the budget.

Councilmember Loewenstein reviewed his proposed budget motion starting with a General Fund balance of $69,304 left over after all Decision Packages are accepted; addressed the Subdivision Park Trust Fund; noted all Decision Packages, unless otherwise indicated, are approved and suggested approving DP 6 with increased tennis fees at $60,000 (based at $3.00/hour), bringing the General Fund to $129,000.

He suggested that parking permit fees be increased to $1.75 instead of $2.00 because of issues with the Coastal Zone; suggested approving the Alta Vista resurfacing and mentioned no decision until the final decision is made by Council on pickleball which comes out of the Subdivision Park Trust Fund running balance, so it assumes $90,000 budget for that which brings the total to $1.334 million.

Councilmember Obagi spoke about adding $90,000 to the General Fund balance after making that decision and City Manager Witzansky agreed.

Finance Director Collazo explained a reduction in the Subdivision Park Trust Fund of $90,000 making the total $1.3 million and giving the General Fund $90,000 back.

Councilmember Loewenstein confirmed it would be $1.4 million, minus $90,000; discussed approval of DP 59 for the historic resource survey update and noted rubberized resurfacing comes out of the Subdivision Park Trust Fund.

City Manager Witzansky reported that there is some concern with that, unless staff can specifically identify what would be QUIMBY Funds raised by new home construction in the immediate vicinity of the park; noted it would be challenging because Dale Page Park is not considered a regional park.

Councilmember Nehrenheim suggested switching Alta Vista to come out of the General Fund.

Councilmember Obagi reported that Dale Page needs to come out of the General Fund.

City Manager Witzansky reported Council can have the General Fund covered in the motion.

Councilmember Obagi reported BRR 17 has to have $85,500 impact on the General Fund.

Councilmember Loewenstein continued presenting his proposed budget motion; opposed the Riviera Village waiver; spoke in support of parking fees for the harbor parking garage because of the depletion of the Harbor Enterprise Funds so the 55 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 29 ends

impact is only $63,750.

Councilmember Obagi asked whether Councilmember Loewenstein would be open to shortening the holiday at Riviera Village as that goes to the General Fund, whereas the pier goes to the Uplands. He explained that in their motion, the holiday is described as one week, from December 24, 2024 to January 1, 2025.

Councilmember Loewenstein stated that would be acceptable as the City would still have the waiver for two weeks during the holidays.

Councilmember Nehrenheim interjected that the point of the waiver is to attract people to the area to shop during holiday events.

Discussion followed regarding whether to approve two or three weeks during the holidays and the City providing the cheapest parking in the South Bay.

Councilmember Nehrenheim reflected on the last time this was done in the City and noted how residents complained; noted if the City does this, there will be severe ramifications; reminded everyone that there are mostly small businesses in the area, this is the time of year when they make their money and need the City’s help.

Councilmember Obagi stated that Councilmember Nehrenheim has bargained with Council twice now in the last two meetings and got Council to compromise, then not voted for it; he said they will consider reducing it to two weeks during the holiday in their motion.

City Manager Witzansky stated that currently, the Obagi/Behrendt motion is based on a four-week prediction, based on $128,900 of General Fund money and $126,100 of Uplands and Tidelands money on an 80/20 split.

Councilmember Kaluderovic understood the tradition and that people may be upset about not getting free parking but felt they would understand once they realize the additional costs spent on crossing guards and how the City will need to take money from the General Fund to fund a boat ramp.

Councilmember Loewenstein agreed with Councilmember Kaluderovic in terms of crossing guards and reported he is trying to lobby the School District to pick up some of the costs. He discussed $417,000 by the expired meter citation.

Councilmember Kaluderovic reported the BRR indicated $37,500, not $63,000.

Councilmember Loewenstein explained Finance Director Collazo updated the figure to $37,500; discussed Police standby service fees at $21,200 and opposed the additional two part-time Municipal Service Officers (MSOs) as he felt the City should not spend money to collect citation money.
56 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 30 ends

It was clarified by RBPD Chief Hoffman that MSOs do parking citation enforcement and enforcement at the pier in addition to other Municipal Code enforcement.

In reply to Councilmember Obagi’s question, RBPD Chief Hoffman discussed the job duties of the proposed MSOs and addressed the option of part-time MSOs assigned to doing parking enforcement in the parking structures along the Esplanade and Riveria Village; he noted this would allow areas that were not previously seeing as much parking enforcement to be covered as much as other parts of the City. He added that at a part-time salary of $26,000 annually would be covered by the parking revenue that would be generated through citation enforcement but noted the City does not recover enough to cover the salary with enforcement on the pier and for the other types of non-parking violations.

In reply to Councilmember Behrendt’s question, RBPD Chief Hoffman reported MSOs would be able to cover enforcement on the pier as well as parking enforcement. He noted it is a part-time position but, theoretically, an MSO could start in Lot 13 and travel south along Harbor Drive and through the parking structures, down the Esplanade and Riviera Village and by the time they got through Riviera Village it would be time to turn around and there would be another batch of parked cars that they could cover; asserted that the RBPD could use additional part-time MSOs that could be allocated to wherever there is a need.

Councilmember Behrendt commented that at that price the City will be getting a lot of bang for the buck.

RBPD Chief Hoffman stated that MSOs are a good value, regardless of where the City uses them, whether for quality-of-life violations, the harbor or for parking enforcement; stated value would be greater if they focused more on parking enforcement violations since that generates revenue.

Councilmember Loewenstein did not see the point of spending money to generate money for parking citations if most of what MSOs are doing is parking enforcement; talked about quality-of-life citations for enforcement in the Esplanade but noted it is a cost of doing business to increase enforcement.

Councilmember Behrendt stated Councilmember Loewenstein makes a valid point; noted there are quality-of-life issues at the pier including skateboarders, bicyclists going down the International Boardwalk and dogs; felt at the Chief’s discretion, if MSOs focused on enforcement at the pier and International Boardwalk, that may address the matter.

RBPD Chief Hoffman noted that it would be a positive impact and that every little bit helps; reported over 100 citations in the area the past two weekends; talked about summertime getting busy and reiterated that RBPD will take all the help it can get.

He reported those areas are not enforced as frequent as other areas; stated that increased enforcement should increase compliance and will allow the City to reach 57 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 31 ends

the overall goal of correcting behavior. He added the amount of revenue generated is going to be less when doing quality-of-life enforcement as opposed to parking enforcement; talked about it taking a long time to hire for the positions and spoke about this being an investment in the future.

Councilmember Nehrenheim reported getting complaints about dogs on the beach and in response to his question, RBPD Chief Hoffman reported that citations are being issued for dogs on the beach and on the bike path, the lower bike path and the pier as part of MSO quality-of-life enforcement; stated the beach and animal control are based on the County where County ordinances are enforced and stated he was uncertain if MSOs are writing citations for County sections.

City Attorney Webb added, that in different contexts, his office has prosecuted for violations of County Code and often will and stated that if they are misdemeanors, his office will file the misdemeanor for the County Code as well as for the Municipal Code. In response to Councilmember Nehrenheim’s question, he reported that citations are being issued for dogs on the beach and the bike path, but they are not misdemeanors; understood the issue has been the overwhelming number of people who take their dogs to the beach and talked about public outreach and the issue of service dogs.

Councilmember Nehrenheim restated his question as to whether MSOs will be able to issue citations for violations relating to dogs on the pedestrian and bike paths; City Attorney Webb responded that he would like to review the role of what MSOs have been authorized to do versus Police Officers.

Mayor Light redirected discussions to the topic at hand.

Councilmember Nehrenheim felt it is important to understand the job function if the City is to hire someone to do a job function and wanted to ensure clarity.

In response to Mayor Light’s question regarding whether the cost of MSOs is charged to the Tidelands and Uplands Funds, City Manager Witzansky reported that costs for part-time MSOs are charged to the General Fund; he does not believe MSOs are being assigned to the Tidelands and Uplands Funds and noted this is envisioned as a General Fund net neutral activity.

Councilmember Loewenstein noted agreement with the proposed increase for concealed carry weapon permits and the path of history markers (8 instead of 4), totaling $43,400; eliminated $80,000 to retain a consulting firm, noting it is not needed this year; discussed improvements of three Fire Stations at $189,000 unless the bond passes at which time it could be reappropriated elsewhere. He addressed the Wilderness Park master plan at $350,000 from the Subdivision Park Trust Fund and pickleball at Dominguez Park.

Discussion followed regarding the need to further explore installing pickleball courts 58 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 32 ends

at Dominguez Park, the existing space for six courts identified in a 2022 report and the need to add substrata.

City Manager Witzansky reported the site work was not included in a sufficient capacity to manage the condition of the soil there.

Councilmember Loewenstein added the City could also consider Aviation Park but suggested Dominguez Park; referenced BRR 56 and DP 36 at $50,000 for art on Artesia and agreed with the allocation to Pier Peak at $50,000 for custodial part-time position for rodent eradication on the bike path.

Discussion followed regarding charging the Tidelands and Uplands funds and taking it out of the General Fund, instead.

Councilmember Loewenstein continued discussing the proposed motion to include, less than 50% of box street sign replacement allocation at $65,000; allocation based on color scheme and only for faded and broken signs; addressed slurry sealing on Broadway from the D2 Capital Discretionary Fund and leftovers from last year’s budget according to Engineering.

In response to Councilmember Obagi’s question regarding the source of the leftovers, City Manager Witzansky reported Engineering updated quotes; noted there was an appropriation last year for $119,000 for a portion of the work; staff updated costs and there was some residual from the budget last year.

Councilmember Loewenstein addressed BRR 25 to include slurry sealing, striping, traffic flow, and a study; traffic pole painting for aesthetics at $72,000 on Prospect to complete the entire corridor; felt it should be done City-wide; suggested allocating $15,000 for Juneteenth and talked about the possibility of grant funding for the event:
proposed $30,000 from the Subdivision Park Trust Fund for the El Segundo Blue Butterfly Habitat and $60,000 from the same fund for improvements at the Alta Vista Baseball Fields; $40,000 for a community garden in north Redondo Beach (regional); $2,500 from the General Fund for Alta Vista Movie Nights; $25,000 out of the General Fund for a consultant to study short term rentals; $25,000 from the General Fund to plant more trees in the City; accepted BRR 23 with an additional $24,000 for a total of $62,000; a new holiday tree at City Hall for $40,000 and signature events at $13,000 for the Riviera Village bid. Councilmember Loewenstein spoke about increasing rents and percentage at the Performing Arts Center; reported it is full all the time and suggested an additional 10%; raising the parking meter permit fee to $150,000 rather than $144,000; alleged that each dollar brings in about $1,600 of revenue and claimed that at the end, there will be $173,000 for City Council to allocate or save.

Discussion followed regarding the ending balance in the park piece and the ability to make adjustments to the budget during the mid-year review. 59 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 33 ends

City Manager Witzansky reported that staff will verify the calculations and asked for clarification regarding signature events.

Finance Director Collazo requested clarification on the increase to rent and percentages by 10% and on effective date.

Councilmember Nehrenheim proposed a date of July 1st.

Councilmember Loewenstein added in three additional signs at Ito Park at $30,000.

Councilmember Kaluderovic explained one is for the family, one is information about internment camps and the other for the Executive Order.

Finance Director Collazo reported it is a detailing of the history of the Ito Family, Redondo Beach Executive Order 9066, Public Law 503 and the Santa Anita Assembly Center and the relocation centers, three items for $30,000.

Councilmember Loewenstein added that at the end of the day, there will be $203,000 in the John Parsons Public Art Fund and $143,00 left in the General Fund and $504,000 left in the Subdivision Park Trust Fund and felt the proposed budget motion is responsible and balanced.

Councilmember Kaluderovic asked about funding for crossing guards and explained the DP funded up to 22 and that 27 locations were identified as needing crossing guards.

Councilmember Nehrenheim suggested asking the School Board to fund the additional five crossing guards needed.

City Manager Witzansky reported that over the course of the trial program, 27 locations were staffed, the core budget has funding for 12, the DP provides additional one-time funding to raise that amount to 22, so, currently, the City is 5 locations short on funding.

Councilmember Loewenstein stated the School District needs to step up and help the City with this issue, whether it is the District or the Education Foundation; claimed it is as important as their enrichment programs and asserted this is an albatross on the City’s budget every year. He acknowledged the School District does a lot for the City every year but felt this is something the City needs to make a case for.

As far as how the School District feels about it, Councilmember Loewenstein reported they are interested in looking at the SROs, that their budget is tight and that they would try to approach their enrichment organizations, such as the Education Foundation, for help.

City Manager Witzansky referenced BRR 26 and the seven signature events in that 60 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 34 ends

category and confirmed Council’s wish to continue them and add a little extra.

Finance Director Collazo declared the John Parsons Public Art Fund was updated to $1,111,157.47; more discussion ensued regarding the figure.

Discussion followed about the Holiday tree for $40,000, tree-trimming, replacing the City’s “Charlie Brown” Christmas tree and finding a good tree that fits in the area.

Councilmember Kaluderovic asserted that must-haves include the crossing guards, Franklin Park funded at $500,000, with all abilities, from QUIMBY Funds and, that should the bond pass, redirect the funds for improvements in Police and Fire Stations to the shooting range.

Regarding Franklin Park, Councilmember Loewenstein talked about the Friendship Foundation being next door and suggested approaching them to see if they are willing to split the cost or contribute to the improvements.

Councilmember Kaluderovic reported that the current playground needs to be replaced; mentioned the intent should be of designing something unique and complimentary to the campus and with the people and with the intention that the space is shared with the Friendship Foundation.

Councilmember Obagi presented details of his and Councilmember Behrendt’s budget motion; thanked City staff and Councilmember Behrendt for working with him; recommended approving all DPs and the 5-year CIP unless otherwise indicated and noted where amendments have been made; noted only that part of the DP or CIP is amended and that the balance is approved as proposed. He addressed DP 6 to approve all with increases in BRR 38, except prime time increased to $3.00 per hour; discussed the impacts of parking meter fee increases and delayed implementation; stated that ultimately, the ordinance would build in next year’s implementation $0.25 year increase so that ultimately it would result in $2.00 per hour; talked about Alta Vista resurfacing coming from the Subdivision Park Trust Fund after a Council discussion of pickleball there; discussed Dale Page Park at $85,000 from the General Fund and accepted the parking fee waiver from December 24, 2024 to January 1, 2025; noting that Hanukkah starts on December 24, 2024 this year and that he would be willing to extend it to the week before December 24th to allow for holiday shopping, but that is not currently accounted for in the proposal and requested a BRR before the next budget, specifically comparing the parking revenue generated in Fiscal Year 2024 with that of Fiscal Year 2023.

Discussion followed regarding $128,900 full holiday waiver value in the General Fund.

Councilmember Obagi continued presenting the budget recommendations addressing the expired meter citation fee increase from $50 to $75. In reply to his question regarding whether the City is able to increase street-sweeping citations, 61 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 35 ends

RBPD Chief Hoffman reported it should be included in the 10% increase to the Master Fee Schedule.

Regarding BRR 44, Councilmember Obagi recommended $21,200; spoke about an existing problem at the pier with a lack of parking enforcement; recommended adding at least two more and revisiting the possibility of hiring more in next year’s budget, depending on how collections and enforcement is going; noted this is indicated against the General Fund but the intention is to at least break even.

City Manager Witzansky confirmed that it is envisioned as a net neutral, cost neutral approach.

Discussion regarding showing a zero impact in terms of the DP, increasing both revenue and expenditures by $55,922.

Councilmember Nehrenheim spoke about budgeting for positions; noted it has to be included in the budget; felt that if the department starts creating and driving revenue it is great, but that is different.

City Manager Witzansky stated it applies for full-time employees but the discussion is about part-time employees (so irrelevant) and reported that it would be a personnel expense and would impact revenue, so both must be accounted for.

Councilmember Obagi addressed BRR 44 regarding a permanent fee increase for CCW from $69 to $500.

City Manager Witzansky interjected, that regarding MSOs, it should not affect the General Fund balance, it should show as zero; reiterated that both revenue and expenditures will be increased by $55,922 and that it be added to the notes.

Councilmember Obagi addressed path of history markers, noting the budget approves five and changed it to eight; agreed with removing $80,000 under BRR 21 but voiced his concern as getting ambulances services would increase revenues to the City and Council has the votes in favor for it now and suggested that the City could get a head start.

Councilmember Loewenstein agreed with the need to discuss it further.

Councilmember Obagi discussed the Fire Station upgrades, BRR 21 at $189,000, adding that it will be spent regardless because it is a quick fix that can be implemented to immediately improve things; spoke about the all-abilities playground at Franklin Park at $500,000 from the Subdivision Park Trust Fund that does not impact the General Fund; reported the total for the Subdivision Park Trust Fund at $834,220; spoke about funding BRR 8 and the CIP and updated figures for Aviation Park Field at $120,000 for six courts with sound insulation and accounting for inflation; indicated there is enough space for two more courts at a cost of $131,000 62 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 36 ends

and suggested adding it to the budget next year. He felt that pickleball players have waited long enough; reported they are impinging on other sports such as basketball; claimed the City needs to make a place for them and that Aviation Park Fields is the perfect spot; suggested using the John Parsons Public Art Fund at $50,000 for the Artesia Art Program for a total of $450,000, otherwise DPs and other BRRs are approved; assigned $50,000 of overtime for the Public Works Department; approved BRR 1 per BRR 23 to seek an increase in payment from Hermosa Beach for the annual cost of prosecution services; per BRR 55, seek partial reimbursement greater than $100,000 from RBUSD for two SRO's and crossing guard deployment at locations adjacent to 17 school sites and from Saint Lawrence Private School for crossing guard deployment at that location; BRR 50 to return with a discussion about potentially increasing Transit Occupancy Tax (TOT); BRR 8 to fund sound insulation for pickleball courts at Alta Vista and if Council does decide to move forward with any pickleball courts there; BRR 40 funding to plant Seacliff buckwheat along North Catalina Ave., North Francisco Ave., Harbor Drive and International Boardwalk as appropriate for the El Segundo Blue Butterfly Habitat Expansion at $30,000; talked about a CIP update estimate for Grant Ave. to $4.7 million; remove the North Redondo Water Recycling Project; DP 47 changing the range of part-time recreation from $17 to $20 per hour; addressed slurry sealing on Broadway and Cornelia; touched on the Juneteenth festival with the possibility of doing a joint event with Manhattan Beach next year; BRR 55 related to crossing guards to maintain 27 positions and stated the resulting total for the General Fund is $69,051.

In reply to Mayor Light’s question regarding Wilderness Park, Councilmember Obagi reported there is carryover money and for the next transfer of QUIMBY fees, he stated that he would give it all to Wilderness Park because, absent of anything happening at the power plant site, that is the greatest opportunity for open space development and redevelopment that the City has. He added that he loves the work that went into the Master Plan; noted the site clearly needs a lot of work, added a request to bring back a discussion at Council regarding adoption/modification of the Wilderness Park Master Plan including policy directive authorizing the SBPC to fence off newly planted plants.

Mayor Light noted that Interim Community Services Director Hause has provided an approval for that.

Discussion followed regarding the length of time it has taken the City to make improvements at Wilderness Park.

Mayor Light stated there is a risk of a veto if nothing is allotted for Wilderness Park in the Obagi/Behrendt motion budget.

Councilmember Loewenstein noted he is in favor of pickleball; spoke about $350,000 covering design costs as well as funding for construction.

Councilmember Obagi noted he has no pet projects in the budget. 63 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 37 ends

Councilmember Loewenstein mentioned Art on Artesia and Dale Page Park for $585,000 as pet projects; noted his recommendation was revenue neutral in terms of the slurry sealing and that District 1 has nothing and there is something in their budget motion for everyone and talked about Councilmember Obagi’s motion depleting the Subdivision Park Trust Fund in one year.

Councilmember Obagi stated there are numerous funds that regularly get depleted to zero every year and then built back up; he stated he is not that concerned since last year the fund was in the negative and now it is back up; stated with the number of developments coming on line in District 4 using the Galleria project as an example with potentially 650 units, the future looks bright.

Discussion followed regarding increases of parking meter violation fees.

Councilmember Loewenstein reported someone wrote to him asking not to increase the fees from $110 to $200.

City Attorney Webb advised that Council should not be receiving or checking emails during public hearings because it is all supposed to be made on the testimony you receive at the hearing and urged Council to be careful checking messages during a public hearing.

Councilmember Loewenstein expressed concerns with no community garden in North Redondo and Councilmember Obagi felt there is no space for it.

Councilmember Nehrenheim suggested there is plenty of space at Anderson Park.

Councilmember Obagi spoke about a lack of desire from residents of North Redondo.

Councilmember Nehrenheim reported receiving information from a resident who sent a list of potential areas for a community garden in North Redondo.

Mayor Light confirmed there is a demand in North Redondo for a community garden.

More discussion followed regarding other areas in North Redondo suitable for a community garden.

Councilmember Obagi stated that Council cannot, in one year, correct all of the deficiencies of prior Councils while failing to recognize the need to raise fees that were not increased, as Councilmember Kaluderovic has suggested; felt the City cannot go from a fee of $110 to $350 for a parking permit; noted residents will be very upset.

Councilmember Kaluderovic noted that people would be buying the fee, so they do not have to pay the meter and is cheaper to buy the annual parking permit than pay 64 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 38 ends

the meter each time.

Councilmember Obagi suggested increasing it to $200 this year and deciding whether to make an adjustment next year.

Councilmember Kaluderovic reported that her strategy involves increasing the fees more this time instead of having smaller increases every year going forward; believed it is irresponsible to leave the City’s balance so low and felt it important to create revenue.

Councilmember Obagi thought that 95% of the tickets issues are street-cleaning fees, therefore, they are not targeting the right thing by raising the parking meter citation from $50 to $75 but instead that the City should go beyond the 10% for the increase of the street sweeping citation and mentioned going from $45 to $55.

City Manager Witzansky believed the City’s portion of that fee is $35 and the rest goes to other things and added the City would increase its portion of the fee.

Councilmember Behrendt felt Councilmember Kaluderovic made a fair point and questioned if it could be made a little higher and referenced DP 4; in response to his question, Councilmember Kaluderovic stated she does not have one item that she feels should be prioritized over another in terms of revenue; spoke about prioritizing the creation of revenue and having a pot of funds to do the work and added that she wants to prioritize projects that can be realistically completed.

Discussions followed regarding finding an amount to raise the annual parking permit fee, not knowing it until it is tested; increasing after school recreation fees for increased capacity with Council’s ability to make adjustments later on; Aviation Facility fees and being in the middle range in terms of regional recreation fees.

City Manager Witzansky reported that the City is consistently issuing more than 20,000 citations per year for street sweeping violations; stated the current proposed fee schedule increase in DP 4 has the City’s portion of that site going from $30 to $35, so effectively a $5 increase; announced that if the City were to take that up to $40, raising it an additional 10%, would result in another $100,000 and change.

Councilmember Behrendt talked about the Alta Vista Tennis Center increasing rates to $4.00 per hour across the board and acknowledged the proposed increases would increase revenue.

Councilmember Obagi expressed concerns with a 40% increase in costs for playing tennis and asked if there is interest in delaying the $14 until the repaving occurred.

Councilmember Kaluderovic’s point was to fund it with the increased rate of $14; on another note acknowledged the Mayor is focused on Wilderness Park. 65 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 39 ends

In reply to Councilmember Obagi’s question, City Manager Witzansky reported that Wilderness Park is farther along and the City will be able to spend more money on it next year than on the other two projects that Council is considering for QUIMBY allocation; clarified that both the all-abilities playground and pickleball courts still require design effort, so realistically what the City will spend next year for either of those projects will be in the design plans and specifications for the two sites.

Public Works Director Winje added that based on what was presented last week regarding the 28 projects they have to finish and the 25 projects in design phase, the two projects would need to be elevated on someone’s priority list as there are many things already in the works.

Councilmember Obagi declared he is comfortable with allocating some of the money put aside for pickleball to Wilderness Park; felt it would be prudent to allocate some from the all-abilities playground design at Franklin Park and leave some money unallocated. He proposed reducing the allocation from $500,000 to $200,000.

Councilmember Kaluderovic reported she is proposing a design/build situation; stated she is reluctant to use QUIMBY money without prioritizing that neighborhood first.

Mayor Light mentioned the 115 units in Legado in completion; asked about the time limits for the veto process and in reply to his questions, City Manager Witzansky reported the Mayor would have five days from receipt of the resolution from the City Clerk to sign or veto it and advised the City has an obligation to pass a balanced budget by June 30th.

City Attorney Webb confirmed that the Mayor has 5 days from receiving the resolution from the City Clerk to sign it or veto it and an obligation to pass the budget by June 30th.

City Manager Witzansky suggested that if the Mayor is strongly considering vetoing some or any portion of these motions, it would be good to voice it now.

Councilmember Obagi reported approving $500,000 from Aviation Field to Wilderness Park.

Councilmember Loewenstein adjusted his budget motion, allocating $135,000 for crossing guards out of the General Fund and also drawing down the $500,000 for the all-abilities playground from the QUIMBY Fund and adding budget on the shooting range; commenting he is giving Councilmember Kaluderovic everything she wants; he stated there is something in the budget for everyone and the proposed changes would result in a total of $7,917 in the General Fund and $4,200.20 in the QUIMBY Fund.

Discussion followed regarding the systemic fee increases in revenue to the City, 66 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 40 ends

allocated $350,000 for Wilderness Park for a total of $750,000, starting the pickleball design process, specifying in the budget motion that if the bond passes, $189,000 can be redirected back to the shooting range for the necessary soft costs that will need to be covered by the City and delaying implementation of the projects identified until after November.

More discussion ensued regarding the budget motions and the projects identified.

Mayor Light invited public comments.

Nancy Skiba, via Zoom, hoped Council will not increase the CCW fee as discussed, from $69 to $500; noted the substantial increase seems punitive and prohibiting and talked about doing something fairer.

Richard Raynor, District 1, spoke about parking permit fees; talked about the convenience of not having to deal with metered parking; opined it is a losing proposition as people will not spend $500 a year for metered parking and addressed the importance of quality-of-life.

Councilmember Behrendt suggested taking a 15-minute break to refine the budget and the budget motion.

Motion by Councilmember Behrendt, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, to take a 15-minute recess.

City Manager Witzansky noted the need to clearly address BRR 1, BRR 56 and BRR 26 related to signature events and as it pertains to new CIP projects; he asserted it did not include the two projects that are added via the BRRs, and Council will need to revisit what is not part of the priority that is currently in play; added that both of those projects would be new to the CIP and there is currently no momentum on those projects.

Councilmember Nehrenheim reported that the Coastal Zone is paying for a lot of this and there’s tons of revenue and there is no shortage of people wanting to go to the beach; stated that in order to have more people going to the beach, you have to have more parking; in reply to his question about angled parking, City Manager Witzansky listed the challenges in doing so and stated it would take a complete redesign of the space.

The motion carried 5-0, by voice vote.

RECESS/RECONVENE
Mayor Light recessed the meeting at 9:33 p.m.

Mayor Light reconvened the meeting at 9:49 p.m.
67 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 41 ends

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Behrendt, Kaluderovic, Loewenstein, Nehrenheim, Obagi, Mayor Light
City Manager Witzansky explained that in reviewing Councilmember Nehrenheim and Loewenstein’s motion, the line item associated with the reduction in available fund balance attributed to the $150 annual parking fee as opposed to the $200 in the DP was underrealized, as opposed to a $64,000 impact has an impact of -$84,000.

Councilmember Loewenstein suggested that could be cured by raising the citations for street sweeping to $40.

City Manager Witzansky confirmed it would more than cure it as raising the street sweeping fee to $40, along with extra fees from the State, generates a little over $100,000; answered a question regarding percentages and rent increases and needing to ensure the master fee schedule and the next item is adjusted to reflect those changes by 10% and noted the resulting balance would be close to $90,000.

Councilmember Nehrenheim pointed out the PAC is losing $540,000 per year and agreed to do 5% instead of 10%.

Motion by Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Loewenstein, and approved by voice vote, to close the Public Hearing.

Motion carried, 5-0.

Motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim to present the budget as shown in the updated spreadsheet.

In response to questions from Councilmember Obagi, Councilmember Nehrenheim reported allocating $350,000 to Wilderness Park and $350,000 to Aviation Field for pickleball and noted a location preference for Central Redondo at Dominguez Park.

Councilmember Obagi confirmed direction is not being provided to go forward with design for pickleball at Aviation Field.

Councilmember Loewenstein reported addressing enforcement officers; noting that most will be for parking enforcement and stated their motion does not add MSOs.

City Manager Witzansky confirmed inclusion of redirecting $500,000 from the Police and Fire Stations to the shooting range if the bond passes and reported dormitory improvements were included in the motion and the recommendation was for $189,000 to be redirected into the bond.
68 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 42 ends

Councilmember Obagi noted he was attributing money to the reallocation of $500,000.

Councilmember Kaluderovic asked about the balance of the General Fund resulting from the motion and City Manager Witzansky replied that it is $37,917.

Substitute motion by Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Behrendt, to allocate $100,000 for the shooting range from the General Fund (on top of the $500,000 already there); include that if the bond passes to fund Fire and Police Stations but not the shooting range, to move the CIP funding plus the BRR allocated for the Fire dormitory to the shooting range CIP ($689,000); allocate $30,000 to the Ito Open Space; increase the After-School Recreation Program fees to $300 per month and $250 per month according to Councilmember Kaluderovic’s motion as well as Aviation Gym fees which will net $34,000 and increase the Alta Vista Tennis fees to $4.

Regarding Signature Events, City Manager Witzansky spoke about the need to reaffirm them and not the need to have funding at this time.

Councilmember Obagi noted that their budget motion leaves $259,000 in the General Fund.

Councilmember Obagi continued with his substitute motion allocating $500,000 to Wilderness Park by reducing the amount of funding allocated for design of pickleball at Aviation Park; allocating $135,000 for 27 crossing guards and the Juneteenth Festival; approving Councilmember Loewenstein’s slurry seal; changing the parttime hourly range to $17 to $20; allocating $30,000 for planting buckwheat on Sea Cliff; funding installation of sound insulation at Alta Vista through the Subdivision Park Trust Fund.

Councilmember Obagi reported the total allocated to Wilderness Park at $400,000; approve BRR 1, BRR 23, BRR 55 and BRR 50; noted the contribution requested is part of the budget; talked about seeking reimbursement from Hermosa Beach and noted it is aspirational until it is realized. He continued with the substitute motion addressed the all-abilities playground at Franklin Park and allocated $500,000 for the project, $189,000 for the shooting range, eight path of history markers; increased the parking permit fee for CCW to $500 and approve hiring two part-time MSOs for enhanced law enforcement.

City Manager Witzansky reported the street sweeping citations have increased by $8, not $10 and reported that to earn $100,000 the fee would go from $35 to $40.

Councilmember Obagi addressed holiday parking from December 24th to January 1st, for this year only, with a BRR to follow to compare revenue from 2023 and 2024, rubberized resurfacing at Dale Page Park and Alta Vista Tennis Center resurfacing from the Subdivision Park Trust Fund; confirmed increasing the parking permit fees 69 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 43 ends

to $200 and suggested directing staff to agendize a discussion about the possibility of increasing the TOT.

A substitute to the substitute motion was made by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, and failed by voice vote, to add to the budget motion, the request for a discussion about TOT, landscaping and sales tax increases as well.

The substitute to the substitute motion failed 2-3-0 by roll call. Councilmembers Kaluderovic, Obagi and Behrendt were opposed.

Councilmember Loewenstein stated this is an unbalanced budget, favoring one area of the City over others; felt his and Councilmember Nehrenheim’s budget motion gave other Councilmembers everything they want and gave Districts 1 and 2 nothing.

Discussion followed regarding the work needed at Alta Vista Park and planting more trees throughout the City.

Mayor Light stated he does not want to veto but hears no balance.

Councilmember Obagi mentioned Riviera Village is receiving Metro grant money to expand sidewalks; there are many pedestrian-oriented Capital Improvements occurring, and residents have had years of month-long free parking during the holidays.

Mayor Light urged Council to compromise.

In reply to Councilmember Loewenstein’s question regarding what he would like from the budget that is not in his and Councilmember Nehrenheim’s budget motion, Councilmember Obagi expressed concerns about not giving clear direction to move forward with pickleball at Aviation Park and asked where Council would like to allocate the remaining $250,000.

Discussion ensued regarding the differences in the different budget motions, citing challenges with implementing pickleball at Dominguez Park because of land subsidence issues, previous policy discussions regarding pickleball at Aviation Park, giving residents what they clamor for, allocating the remaining $259,000, the rationale for taxing the Coastal Zone as much as possible and the negative impact Christmas can have on retailers and small businesses if they follow their budget motion.

Councilmember Loewenstein noted a willingness to designate Aviation Park for pickleball if so desired.

Discussion followed regarding the Mayor’s ability to veto. 70 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 44 ends

City Attorney Webb reported that it has to be a resolution or an ordinance; must be in writing and the Mayor would need to state his reason for doing it within 5 days of receipt from the City Clerk and stated anything else can be done during the meeting.

Councilmember Behrendt agreed with the Mayor and asked for suggestions for allocations of the remaining $259,000.

Councilmember Loewenstein spoke about the $180,000 for stripping and traffic.

City Manager Witzansky reported that is a non-cost item as it will come out of the traffic calming budget as proposed and would be backfilled with transportation restricted funds, Prop C, local return Measure R and local return Measure M.

Councilmember Loewenstein reported that was for BRR 25 at $185,000.

Councilmember Obagi reiterated there is still $259,000 left.

Councilmember Nehrenheim talked about having $259,000 extra because of raised fees and rates throughout the system; wondered if there is so much extra, why holiday parking is being restricted in Riviera Village and the Harbor, why the items in District 1 and the community garden in North Redondo are not included, adding that these are small projects that can be done quickly, and are quality-of-life issues across the City and strongly opposed raising fees and taxes at enormous amounts. He added that he and Councilmember Loewenstein have been very judicious about moving forward, have provided something for everyone and talked about being sensitive to residents.

Councilmember Loewenstein expressed concerns about raising parking permits to $200; suggested $150 and felt that would result in a balanced budget.

Councilmember Obagi asked about parking permit fees in surrounding cities.

Councilmember Loewenstein questioned raising them when the budget is balanced.

Councilmember Obagi referenced a 3% cost of living increase.

Discussion followed regarding raising fees another 3% next year, creating revenue, and accepting staff’s recommended increases.

Councilmember Obagi listed parking permit rates for Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Huntington Beach and Seal Beach and talked about needing to advance everything in the City with the increased revenue.

Discussion followed regarding signal painting, changing street signs and accelerating projects that can be completed right now.
71 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 45 ends

Councilmember Behrendt referenced the box street sign allocation and agreed to include it at $65,000.

Discussion followed regarding the high school circulation study, the slurry seals and planting more trees at $25,000.

Councilmember Behrendt accepted the changes proposed by Councilmember Obagi.

Councilmember Nehrenheim asked for three weeks of free holiday parking at Riviera Village.

Councilmember Obagi stated he would accept a maximum of two weeks of free holiday parking but kept the proposed one week from December 24th to January 1st.

Councilmember Nehrenheim requested an additional $10,000 subsidy for Riviera Village Summer Fest and Councilmember Obagi and Behrendt agreed.

Councilmember Nehrenheim addressed lights for $2,500; noted his discretionary funds are spent; discussed Alta Vista Movie Nights for $2,500 and baseball fields for $60,000.

Councilmember Obagi noted the availability of the Subdivision Park Trust Fund and made the applicable changes to the budget motion.

Councilmember Nehrenheim mentioned the consultant for the Treasury Office for short-term rentals.

Councilmember Obagi questioned the need for a consultant; suggested a hearing from Joy Ford regarding the number of complaints received and prosecuted and asked for clarification.

Councilmember Nehrenheim talked about the consultant’s scope of work including setting up a complaint hotline. He clarified that it is a service, not a consultant.

Councilmember Obagi stated he would rather have a policy discussion first, before moving ahead with that item and noted the resulting total at $156,780.

Councilmember Behrendt agreed that is a good cushion.

Mayor Light called for the vote.

The Substitute motion carried, 3-2 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Behrendt, Kaluderovic, Obagi
NOES: Loewenstein, Nehrenheim
72 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 46 ends

ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Mayor Light suggested preparing for a special meeting.

City Clerk Manzano read title to Resolution No. C-2406-054.

RECONSIDERATION OF ITEM NO. L.2
Mayor Light announced that reconsideration will occur at this time, not next week.

City Attorney Webb noted that since the motion passed, it is as if the vote on the budget never occurred.

Councilmember Obagi asserted that he specifically asked that question prior to the motion.

City Attorney Webb reported he was not in the Chamber when Councilmember Obagi asked the question.

City Manager Witzansky strongly suggested that Council take the time to do this right, open the public hearing and make its decision in order to meet the budget deadline. He added that if Council closes the public hearing and waits for a veto, and it comes, the budget will not be done by June 30th and suggested starting with what is precipitating the veto.

In response to Councilmember Kaluderovic’s question, City Attorney Webb advised Council to reopen the item and start the process of making a new motion.

City Manager Witzansky added that if Council does not reopen the public hearing, they better finish the item tonight and that if Council is just going to reconsider the motion, it better get to a concrete resolution.

Councilmember Loewenstein stated the only reason he voted “No”, was because he and Councilmember Nehrenheim provided a balanced budget without exorbitant increases in fees and provided almost everything Council colleagues requested and reiterated recommendations for increases.

City Attorney Webb referenced $159,000 from the last motion and suggested Council consider what fees it would like to cut up to $159,000, noting he is trying to help move things along.

Councilmember Loewenstein confirmed he would like to reduce the parking permit fee to $150 instead of $200, resulting in $84,000. He reiterated his point about raising the parking permit fee to $200; felt that doing so just because everyone else is doing 73 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 47 ends

it is irresponsible.

Councilmember Obagi suggested setting the parking permit fee at $175 and Councilmember Loewenstein agreed.

Discussion followed regarding providing free holiday parking at Riviera Village for two weeks.

City Manager Witzansky reported that originally, the BRR was for $255,000 and the General Fund portion was $128,900 and stated that number is now cut in half and the remaining $126,100 to the Uplands and Tidelands Funds is also cut in half.

Councilmember Obagi made the recommended adjustments to the budget motion spreadsheets.

Councilmember Nehrenheim recommended raising the Performing Arts Center by 10% to offset the adjustments made; more discussion occurred; Councilmember Obagi declined needing to raise the Performing Arts Center.

City Manager Witzansky reported that $64,050 would be added to the motion and the General Fund balance would be $124,555.

Motion by Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Behrendt, and carried by roll call vote, to approve the Obagi/Behrendt budget motion as updated in the latest version of the budget motion spreadsheets.

The motion carried 5-0.

City Clerk Manzano read title to Resolution No. CC-2406-054.

L.3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER PROPOSED USER FEE AMENDMENTS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC WORKS; POLICE; AND

COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENTS
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-049, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USER FEES ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-050, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT USER FEES
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-051, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT USER FEES
74 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 48 ends

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2406-052, A RESOLUTION

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT USER FEES
PROCEDURES:
a. Open Public Hearing, take testimony; and
b. Close the Public Hearing; and
c. Adopt by title only Resolution No. CC- 2406-049; and d. Adopt by title only Resolution No. CC- 2406-050; and e. Adopt by title only Resolution No. CC- 2406-051; and f. Adopt by title only Resolution No. CC- 2406-052
CONTACT: WENDY COLLAZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim, seconded by Councilmember Loewenstein and carried by voice vote, to open the public hearing.

The motion carried 5-0.

City Manager Witzansky stated not much of a presentation is needed but that staff wants to ensure that whatever adjustments being made to the resolutions accommodate the fees that were contemplated in the budget; mentioned additional changes to Police fees to reflect the increase in street-sweeping to $40, the increase to the concealed weapons permit fee, the increase to permit violation fee and tennis court fee, otherwise, it would be as recommended and proposed in the Master Fee Schedule.

Mayor Light invited public comments.

There were no public comments on this item.

Motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim, seconded by Councilmember Loewenstein and carried by voice vote, to close the public hearing.

The motion carried 5-0.

Motion by Councilmember Behrendt, seconded by Councilmember Obagi and approved by voice vote, to adopt by title only, the recommended resolutions with the adjustments Police fees and Community Services fees as contemplated in the budget motion, for Resolutions No. CC-2406-049, CC-2406-050, CC- 2406-051 and CC- 2406-052.

The motion carried 3-2-0. Councilmembers Loewenstein and Nehrenheim were opposed.
75 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 49 ends

City Clerk Manzano read titles to Resolutions No. CC-2406-049, CC-2406-050, CC2406-051 and CC- 2406-052.

RECONSIDERATION OF ITEM NO. L.3
City Manager Witzansky recommended the prior motion that passed with one adjustment reducing the annual parking permit fee from the proposed $200 to $175.

All of the other adjustments that were referenced in the earlier motion which would include the CCW fee increase, the street sweeping fee increase and the parking meter citation violation fee that were described in the BRRs be added to the resolutions plus what was proposed, what was proposed in the four resolutions in the agenda.

Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Kaluderovic, and carried by voice vote, to approve the prior motion reducing the annual parking permit fee from $200 to $175, all other adjustments referenced in the earlier motion including the CCW fee increase, the street sweeping fee increase and the parking meter citation violation fee that were described in the BRRs be added to the resolutions plus what was proposed in the four resolutions in the agenda and approve by title only Resolutions No. CC- 2406-049, CC- 2406-050, CC- 2406-051 and CC- 2406-052.

The motion carried 5-0.

City Clerk Manzano read titles to Resolutions No. CC- 2406-049, CC- 2406-050, CC2406-051 and CC- 2406-052.

Mayor Light thanked everyone for reaching a compromise.

Mayor Light moved to Item No. Q.

M. ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS AGENDAS – None
N. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION PRIOR TO ACTION - None
O. CITY MANAGER ITEM
City Manager Witzansky reported that to do a budget veto, hypothetically, staff has to announce a public hearing to adopt a new budget; noted that typically, it requires a 10-day public notice, which needs to be in the newspaper one week prior and stated it will be difficult to adopt a balanced budget by the end of the fiscal year.

Discussion followed regarding the possibility of scheduling an emergency meeting.

City Attorney Webb noted this has not come up in his 19 years as City Attorney and this is new territory. He added there is no action that Council needs to take, and stated the City Manager just wanted to make Council aware of the situation; 76 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 50 ends

mentioned that hopefully, the City Clerk will produce the resolution promptly and if the Mayor wants to veto it, his request must be in writing with his reasons and it must be done, promptly.

In response to Mayor Light’s question regarding what happens if the deadline is not met, City Attorney Webb mentioned he may have to sue as Council will not have fulfilled its duties under the Charter. He added that he will need to research the matter as this is new territory and will begin doing so tomorrow.

P. MAYOR AND COUNCIL ITEMS - None
P.1. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION

APPOINTING MAYOR PRO TEM, DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES AS
OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 COMMENCING JULY 1, 2024
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION CC-2406-053, A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,

APPOINTING A NEW MAYOR PRO TEM, DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES

AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY FOR A TERM
COMMENCING JULY 1, 2024 AND EXPIRING ON JUNE 30, 2025
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
Mayor Light recommended going back to the old rotation.

There were no public comments on this item.

Motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, and carried by voice vote, to appoint Councilmember Kaluderovic as Mayor Pro Tem and accept the delegations as recommended.

The motion carried 5-0.

City Clerk Manzano read title to Resolution No. CC-2406-053.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Motion by Councilmember Nehrenheim, to reconsider Items No. L.2 and L.3 and reopen the public hearing for next Tuesday.

The motion died for lack of a second.

City Attorney Webb reported that generally, motions to reconsider, according to the City’s past practices, must be made by someone who voted affirmatively for the item. 77 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 51 ends

Councilmember Behrendt indicated he is not in favor or reopening either L.2 or L.3.

In response to Councilmember Obagi’s question as to whether a motion for reconsideration vacates the prior decision, City Manager Witzansky stated he did not believe so. The City Attorney Webb was not in the room to answer the question.

Councilmember Obagi mentioned concerns about the Mayor’s comments regarding possibly vetoing the budget, noting the hard work that has been put into it.

Motion by Councilmember Obagi, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, and carried by voice vote, to reconsider Items No. L.2 and L.3.

The motion carried 3-2. Councilmembers Behrendt and Loewenstein were opposed.

Mayor Light returned to Item L.2.

Q. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REFERRALS TO STAFF
Motion by Councilmember Kaluderovic, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, to direct staff to place on a future agenda, for discussion and possible action on an eBike policy and potential letter to the State regarding impounding eBikes.

Councilmember Loewenstein offered a friendly amendment to figure out a way to have uniform enforcement across all three Beach Cities.

Councilmember Nehrenheim offered a friendly amendment to add a discussion regarding the possibility of scheduling a Tri-City Council Meeting to discuss the possibility of a Tri-City Streets for All.

Councilmembers Kaluderovic and Obagi accepted both friendly amendments.

The motion carried, 5-0.

R. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION – None
S. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – None
T. ADJOURNMENT – 11:00 p.m.

There being no further business to come before the City Council, motion by Councilmember Loewenstein, seconded by Councilmember Nehrenheim, and was approved by voice vote, to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 p.m. to a Regular Closed Session meeting on June 20, 2024 to be held at 4:00 p.m. in the Redondo Beach City Hall Council Chambers, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California.

Motion carried, 5-0.
78 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Page 52 ends

All written comments submitted via eComment are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.

Respectfully submitted:

Eleanor Manzano, CMC
City Clerk
79 Administrative
Report
H.4., File # 24-1792 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: STEPHANIE MEYER, INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR
TITLE

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEMAND
CHECK 116802-116804 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,242,761.40

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approval of Accounts Payable

ATTACHMENTS
· 11122024_RECOMMENDATION_TO_APPROVE
· 11122024_VENDOR_INVOICE_LIST

Page 1 of 1 ends

80 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE

PAYROLL AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 2024
a. Accounts Payable Demands
• Checks 116802-116804, $1,242,761.40
I hereby approve and authorize for payment the above demands.

Mike Witzansky
City Manager
81

! "
#
! $%
&' ( )*+
',-% (
*./0 12 (30 *./ +452 /0$162 162 7$. 162 78 *./0 12. 5 +$2 452 59(2:5 *./0 12+ :1*(5 0. " ! 1;*<50.;4:0.4; 2. ( ;!"
# = !> ?"#= @
!= "
= ? ! "
?@! !#A
"3 @

= ! "*./ (+ <*:14;924 $+*5 .B:2/ ;!"
? @"= ?"#= >

# ! "
= ? " ! "
?@!
A? 3!#

= ! "*./ (+ <*:14;924 $+*5 .B:2/ ;!"
? ># ?"#=

" ! "
= ? # ! "
?@! !A @ 3#

= ! "*./ (+ <*:14;924 $+*5 .B:2/ !>A#@3 =
" @.2C(0564D0 5 $:; 1
? >!

! "
= "
! "
?@= A 3
!
! "*./ (+ $164:20. : 4C 9D C
=? :24B /2<*24( 5$:A; 1
" = ?
@> @
! "
= >
! "
?@"
A "= !# 3

? ! "*./ (+ <*2: 4B /2($E 210E
A "= !# 3 # *./0 12:
A!" ?
3" F 2.+ 0< 2(0 5G B HI .'&J- B&' F 82 Administrative
Report
H.5., File # 24-1769 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: MARC WIENER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
TITLE

APPROVE A HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 SOUTH BROADWAY BEGINNING NOVEMBER 12, 2024 FOR A TERM OF TEN

YEARS AND AUTOMATIC RENEWAL EVERY YEAR THEREAFTER UNLESS TERMINATED The Mills Act is a state law that enables cities to enter into preservation agreements with the owners of officially designated historic buildings. In exchange for assuring continued preservation, property owners qualify for a property tax reduction. The proposed agreement is voluntarily and has been requested by property owners at 707 South Broadway, which was designated as a landmark by the City’s Preservation Commission, and, as such, qualifies for consideration of a Historic Property Preservation Agreement (aka Mills Act Agreement).

BACKGROUND
Since October 1992, the City Council has supported the approval of Historic Property Preservation Agreements with owners of properties designated as Local Historic Landmarks. The Mills Act Program has become a major incentive for property owners to apply for Local Historic Landmark designation under the City's Preservation Ordinance, and the number of Redondo Beach property owners interested in the program has increased each year as more property owners have become aware of its availability and benefits.

At this time, recommended is a Historic Preservation Agreement for the property located at 707 South Broadway. The property owner applied for Landmark Designation on April 7, 2024. This address is listed in the City’s Historic Resources Survey as an A-rated Craftsman structure. Per the survey, A-rated structures are considered to be “obvious examples of historically significant or notable structures indicated by distinctive architectural characteristics or age.” The survey also notes a National rating of “3,” which indicates that the property is considered eligible for designation in the National Register.

The design of the home is a prime example of the Craftsman style of architecture. Very few alterations have been made to the exterior of the main residence with the original shape and form of the home, including exterior materials, remaining intact. The Craftsman style is the most prevalent historic architectural style in the City and, as such, this property is representative of the early period of growth and development in Redondo Beach. Building records reflect permits issued for the residence in 1911, and the detached garage was built in 1961. The application materials indicate that this was the first house on this block, which is very possible. The permit was issued to Matilda Boebinger, one of the few female real estate investors during the early development of the City.

Page 1 of 3 ends

83 H.5., File # 24-1769 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
Boebinger, one of the few female real estate investors during the early development of the City.

There is a Redondo Reflex article from 1913 where Matilda is praising Redondo Beach as an ideal community for investment, with the properties being more affordable and more desirable than other seaside communities. She owned at least five other properties in Redondo Beach. The property merits designation as a local historic landmark, and the Preservation Commission granted landmark status on May 1, 2024. Many of the homes in this area were built closer to the 1920s. There is a another locally designated landmark located at 709 South Broadway, which was constructed in 1923.

The proposed Historic Property Preservation Agreement is identical to other agreements previously approved by the City Council. The following is a description of the most pertinent provisions of the Agreement.

The Mills Act requires that the initial term of the Agreement be ten years. On the anniversary date of the Agreement, it is automatically renewed for an additional year so it has a continual ten-year time horizon. The City, or the owner, may call for the Agreement to not be renewed prior to the established anniversary date. If this happens, the Agreement continues in effect until its current term expires and the property will gradually increase in assessed value each year to match the current market value when the Agreement expires.

The Agreement requires that the subject building be maintained and preserved in keeping with its historic character for the life of the Agreement. As a designated landmark, exterior alterations will be subject to review and approval by the Public Amenities Commission. The Mills Act requires the Agreement to "run with the property," and is binding for all subsequent property owners. The City may cancel the Agreement immediately (different from non-renewal) if it is found that the owner has failed to comply with the Agreement's terms, or if the structure has been allowed to deteriorate to the point where it is no longer a qualified historical structure. Cancellation carries with it a penalty equivalent to 12.5% of the property's full market value.

The primary benefit of the Agreement to the owners is the reassessment of the historic property by the County Assessor's Office based on a special Mills Act formula. The County Assessor, however, will not determine the actual reduction in assessed value until after the Agreement is recorded.

Since the City's Historic Preservation Program is completely voluntary, it is dependent on providing tangible incentives to property owners. The Mills Act is proving to be the primary incentive to encourage owners to list their homes as landmarks and fulfill the program's objective of preserving Redondo Beach's historic character and identity. Since older homes are often in need of more upkeep, the tax benefits of the Mills Act provide owners with additional resources to complete this work.

COORDINATION
The Agreement was coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT
Based on reassessments, which have been made for other properties in Redondo Beach pursuing Mills Act agreements, a typical residence would be reassessed at approximately 60% of its current market value. This would reduce the owners' annual property taxes by approximately 40%. The actual amount of the tax reduction is dependent upon the property's current assessed value. For example, if the property is currently valued at $1,000,000, the reduced property assessment would

Page 2 of 3 ends

84 H.5., File # 24-1769 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
example, if the property is currently valued at $1,000,000, the reduced property assessment would be in the range of $600,000.

The City currently receives 16.6% of the total property taxes collected on a given property. Based on the above, the annual loss in property tax revenue to the City would be approximately $660 for a $1,000,000 property reassessed at $600,000.

APPROVED BY:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS
· Agmt - Historic Property Preservation Agreements with Landmark Resolutions, 707 South Broadway
· Application for Landmark Designation, 707 South Broadway · Site Photos of Properties, 707 South Broadway

Page 3 of 3 ends

85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
Administrative
Report
H.6., File # 24-1811 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: MARC WIENER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
TITLE
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1

SUBDIVISIONS OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING

RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3282-24, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE

FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER

AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3283-24, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE

REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING

ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the November 5, 2024 City Council meeting, following a series of discussions in October, the Council approved the introduction of three ordinances amending Title 10 Chapters 1, 2 and 5 of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code intended to implement the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element. The three Ordinances are now ready for second reading and adoption.

BACKGROUND
The City is in the process of updating the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety and Noise Elements of the General Plan, and Associated Zoning Ordinance amendments. The General Plan is composed of various State required elements and provides long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, conservation, and sustainability of the City. The Zoning Ordinance is an implementation tool of the General Plan and is required to be consistent with its land-use

Page 1 of 2 ends

123
H.6., File # 24-1811 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
implementation tool of the General Plan and is required to be consistent with its land-use designations and all of its policies.

On October 1, October 15, and October 29, 2024, the City Council discussed the proposed updates.

At the meeting on November 5, 2024, the City Council approved amendments to the City’s existing Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinances intended to implement the City’s Certified 6th Cycle Housing Element. The City Council also adopted a resolution certifying the associated Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2023050732). A subsequent analysis related to the floor area ratio cap for the Beach Cities Health District property is scheduled for Council consideration on December 3, 2024. The remainder of the General Plan update will be presented for discussion in early 2025.

COORDINATION
The Community Development Department and City Attorney’s Office coordinated matters related to the implementation of the Housing Element, including the Zoning Ordinance, Local Coastal Program Amendments, and the preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the Agreement with PlaceWorks, and associated subconsultants, for the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Local Coastal Program updates is $2,272,372. Except for the initial General Fund expenditure of $676,900, the costs to fund this work have been paid from the General Plan Maintenance Fund and through the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant reimbursement funds awarded by the State of California.

APPROVED BY:

Mike Witzansky, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS
· Ord - Zoning Ordinance No. CC-3281-24 Amending Title 10, Chapter 1 · Ord - Zoning Ordinance No. CC-3282-24 Amending Title 10, Chapter 2 · Ord - Zoning Ordinance No. CC-3283-24 Amending Title 10, Chapter 5

Page 2 of 2 ends

124
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24
REDONDO BEACH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER
1 SUBDIVISIONS OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE

FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH
CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER

AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED

PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN
THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

WHEREAS, in 2019, the City initiated work on the City’s 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the City’s 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element presents a framework for meeting the housing needs of existing and future resident populations within the City based on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 2,490 units.

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 2
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on July 5th, 2022, at which time it considered evidence presented by staff, the consultant, and other interested parties and adopted the revised City of Redondo Beach 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element, incorporating the amendments recommended by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and submitted the revised Housing Element to HCD on July 11, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2022, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued a letter certifying the City’s 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element and noting that the City must continue timely and effective implementation of all programs; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Subdivision Ordinance is consistent with, supports, and serves to implement the provisions of Program 13 of the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, a component of program 13 commits the city to allow administrative processing for multi-family projects with up to 15 units; and WHEREAS, the proposed updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinances (including Subdivision Ordinance), and Local Coastal Program (LCP) required for consistency with the General Plan are consistent with, support, and serve to implement the City’s Housing Element inclusive of the “Housing Sites” and “Housing Programs”, and also serve to update the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP consistent with State Housing Laws; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 the City’s Updated Draft General Plan, Draft Zoning Ordinance (including Subdivision Ordinance), and Draft Local Coastal Program, were released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the draft documents; and WHEREAS, on June 20, August 1, and August 15, 2024 the Planning Commission held multiple duly noticed public hearings to take testimony from staff, the public and other interested parties, and to deliberate on updates to the City’s General Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Element, and revisions to the City’s Zoning Ordinances (including Subdivision Ordinance), and LCP required for consistency and to implement the City’s Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2024 the Planning Commission held a final duly noticed public hearing and completed its deliberations on updates to the City’s General Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Elements, and updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinances (including Subdivision Ordinance), and LCP required for consistency and to implement the City’s Housing Element, and took testimony from staff, the public and other interested parties, and considered the associated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and made the following recommendations:
126
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24
REDONDO BEACH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 3

1. That the City Council certify pursuant to CEQA, the Final Program Environmental Impact Report inclusive of its referenced appendices for the “Redondo Beach Focused General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Updates (including Subdivision Ordinance) and Local Program Amendments”, approve appropriate findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and

2. That the City Council adopt a General Plan Amendment to update the City’s Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Noise, and Safety Elements with certain proposed changes and edits as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2024-09-PCR-09; and

3. That the City Council adopt amendments to the Redondo Beach Municipal Code, Title 10, Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1, Subdivisions, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance to make consistent the General Plan Update and to implement the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element inclusive of the zoning amendments for implementing “Housing Sites” and “Housing Programs”; and

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 4
the potential growth in the City over the next 25 years to the horizon year of the General Plan Update of 2050; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 an “Amended Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Report” was issued to advise the public and interested parties that the City of Redondo Beach Planning Division had released the Draft PEIR addressing potential impacts associated with the Redondo Beach Focused General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Update (including Subdivision Ordinance), and Local Coastal Program Amendment (proposed project) for a 47-day review period beginning on August 1, 2024, and ending on September 16, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 the City’s Updated Draft General Plan, Draft Zoning Ordinance, and Draft LCP, were released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the Draft General Plan Document; and
WHEREAS, the City timely received 18 written comments on the Draft PEIR; and WHEREAS, all comments timely received on the Draft PEIR have been responded to and are included in the Final PEIR, which consists of the Draft EIR, responses to comments timely received on the Draft PEIR, and clarifications/revisions to the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 15, and 29, 2024, and November 5, 2024, the City Council, at duly noticed public hearings, considered the Project and the Draft and Final PEIR, at which times the City staff presented its reports and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Final PEIR; and
WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2024, City Council directed staff to move forward with the Housing Element implementation related General Plan, Zoning Ordinance (including Subdivision Ordinance), and Local Coastal Program Amendments to comply with the statutory deadline of February 12, 2025 and defer other proposed nonresidential amendments for later consideration. Additionally, City Council directed City staff to include other residential amendments not required by the City’s Housing Element that change residential capacity at the same time as the Housing Element related amendments; and
WHEREAS, multiple technical studies, environmental scoping meetings, community surveys, public meetings and workshops with the GPAC, the general public, the Planning Commission, and the City Council since 2016 have all served to engage and inform the general public including residents, business owners/operators, and other interested parties and have shaped the resulting draft General Plan Update, and the associated Zoning Ordinance (including Subdivision Ordinance), Zoning Ordinance for 128
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24
REDONDO BEACH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 5

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions are consistent with and serve to implement the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element.

2. The amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions Ordinance are necessary to facilitate the development of affordable housing in the community consistent with State housing law.

3. The City Council considered the information contained in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions amendments, and the City Council certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2023050732), adopted findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals and findings are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.

SECTION 2. PUBLIC COMMENT. That agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Final PEIR and the proposed amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions Ordinance.

Housing Element.
the Coastal Zone, and LCP amendments required for consistency and implementing the SECTION 4. TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 1 SUBDIVISIONS. That 129
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24
REDONDO BEACH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 6
regarding residentially designated properties, which amendments are not identified as program actions in the City’s Housing Element, in accordance with the proposed changes/edits attached as “Exhibit A”.

SECTION 5. SEVERANCE. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this amendment to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of these amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this amendment to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be published by one insertion in the Easy Reader, the official newspaper of said City, and same shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.
[THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element as well as other amendments Planning and Zoning, Chapter 1 Subdivisions to make consistent and implement the the City Council adopt amendments to the Redondo Beach Municipal Code, Title 10 130
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24
REDONDO BEACH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 7
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2024. ________________________________
James A. Light, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ________________________________ Michael W. Webb, City Attorney Eleanor Manzano, CMC, City Clerk 131
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24
REDONDO BEACH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 8

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH )
I, Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk of the City of Redondo Beach, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 3281-24 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5
th day of November, 2024 and approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Redondo Beach, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 12th day of November, 2024, and there after signed and approved by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, and that said ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________
Eleanor Manzano, CMC
City Clerk
132
Exhibit A Page | A-1
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1 SUBDIVISIONS OF THE REDONDO BEACH

MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING

ELEMENT
“Exhibit A”
Amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning,
Chapter 1 Subdivisions of the Redondo Beach
Municipal Code.

Amendments to Chapter 1, Subdivisions
Amendments to Article 5, Tentative Maps
Section 10-1.504 Decisions and reports
Section 10-1.504, Decisions and reports will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Subdivision of not more than three parcels or three parcels or 15 condominium units on any lot and involving no more than two or combination of adjacent lots. If the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, finds that the map for a subdivision of not more than three parcels or three parcels or 15 condominium units on any lot and involving no more than two or combination of adjacent lots meets the requirements of this chapter and the Map Act, the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, shall approve a map of the subdivision within 50 days after the certification of the environmental impact report, adoption of a negative declaration, or a determination by the City that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. If the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, finds that the map does not meet the requirements of this chapter or the Map Act, the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, shall disapprove or conditionally approve the map within such time. Dedications and reservations of property and on-site and off-site improvements may be required by the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, as a condition of approval as authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and this chapter. Written notice of the decision shall be given to the subdivider.
(1) Appeals to the Commission. The decision of the Community Development Director shall be final and conclusive unless, within 10 days after the date of the written notice of decision, the subdivider files a written appeal with the Planning Division requesting a public hearing before the Commission. Notice of public hearing before the Commission to consider an appeal of the decision of the Community Development Director shall be mailed to the subdivider not less than 10 days prior to the date of such hearing. The Commission shall hear the testimony of the subdivider or any witnesses on behalf of the subdivider and information provided by the Community Development Director. The Commission may also hear the testimony of other persons interested in the matter. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, or no later than the date of the next regular Commission meeting, the Commission shall declare its findings, based upon the testimony and documents before it. The Commission may sustain, modify, reject, or overrule any action of the Community Development Director and may make such findings and determinations as are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Map Act or this chapter. The action of the Commission may be appealed to the Council pursuant to Section 10-

1.506 of this article.

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
133
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3281-24, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1 SUBDIVISIONS OF THE REDONDO BEACH

HOUSING ELEMENT
Exhibit A Page | A-2
(b) Subdivisions of four or more parcels or of four or more parcels or creating 16 condominium units or more on any lot or combination of lots or a subdivision involving more than two adjacent lots. In the case of subdivisions of four or more parcels or creating 16 or more condominium units on any lot or combination of lots or a subdivision involving more than two adjacent lots, the Commission shall review the recommendations and, if it finds that the map meets the requirements of this chapter and the Map Act, the Commission shall approve the map of the subdivision within 50 days after certification of the environmental impact report, adoption of a negative declaration, or a determination by the City that the project is exempt from the requirements of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code, unless such time is extended by mutual agreement with the subdivider in accordance with Government Code Section 65957. If the Commission finds that the map does not meet the requirements of this chapter or the Map Act, the Commission shall disapprove or conditionally approve the map within such time.

Section 10-1.1010 Community Development Director or Commission decisions Section 10-1.1010, Community Development Director or Commission decisions will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Subdivision of not more than three parcels or 15 condominium units on any lot and involving no more than two adjacent or combination of lots. If the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, finds that the parcel map for a subdivision of not more than three parcels or 15 condominium units on any lot and involving no more than two adjacent or any combination of lots meets the requirements of this chapter and the Map Act, the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned shall approve the parcel map within 50 days after the certification of the environmental impact report, adoption of a negative declaration, or a determination by the City that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. If the Community Development Director, or his/her assigned, finds that the parcel map does not meet the requirements of this chapter or the Map Act, the Community Development Director shall disapprove or conditionally approve the parcel map within such time.

Dedications and reservations of property and on-site and off-site improvements may be required by the Community Development Director as a condition of approval as authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and this chapter. Written notice of the decision shall be given to the subdivider. (1) Appeals to the Commission. The decision of the Community Development Director may be appealed to the Commission in the manner as provided in Section 10-1.504(a)(1)10-1.504(a)(1) of this chapter.

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Subdivision of four or more parcels or 16 condominium units on any lot or a subdivision involving more than two adjacent combination of lots. In the case of subdivisions of four or more parcels or 16 condominium units on any lot or a subdivision involving more than two adjacent combination of lots, the Commission shall review the recommendations and testimony and, if the Commission finds that the parcel map meets the requirements of this chapter and the Map Act, it shall approve the parcel map within 50 days after certification of the environmental impact report, adoption of a negative declaration, or a determination by the City that the project is exempt from the requirements of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code, unless such time is extended by mutual agreement with the subdivider in accordance with Government Code Section 65957. If the Commission finds that the map does not meet the requirements of this chapter or the Map Act, it shall disapprove or conditionally approve the parcel map within such time.
134
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING
AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE

REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH

THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO
IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6

TH CYCLE
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER

AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY

DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS
PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

WHEREAS, the City’s current General Plan was adopted on May 26, 1992; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2016 the City Council approved the City’s three-year Strategic Plan goal to “Ensure sustainability, livability, and health by completing the General Plan update and by implementing environmentally responsible programs”; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2016, the City Council awarded the contract for planning and environmental consulting services to Placeworks, Inc. for updates to the “Land Use Element” and “Conservation, Recreation and Parks, and Open Space Element” of the City’s General Plan and preparation of the required environmental documents; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016 the City Council approved Resolution No. CC1612-122 establishing a 27-member General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) to provide direct community stakeholder input to the update of the Land Use and Conservation, Recreation and Parks, and Open Space Elements of the General Plan including analysis and recommendations regarding amendments to the Mixed-Use Zoning and Development Standards, and opportunities for additional recreation, parks, and open space areas; and
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. CC-1612-122, the Mayor and City Council selected the members of the GPAC and the City Clerk reviewed all selections and confirmed each was a resident of Redondo Beach. Two (2) members were appointed by the Mayor, one (1) of whom served as the Chair, and each Council Member appointed five (5) members, three (3) of whom resided in their District; and WHEREAS, the GPAC conducted a total of twenty-eight (28) noticed public meetings since April 27, 2017, with their final meeting being held on January 31, 2024. At the final meeting, GPAC completed their discussions and recommendations for the final draft focused General Plan, which includes a consistently formatted, comprehensive General Plan document with a new Introduction, along with updated Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures for the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety, and Noise Elements; and
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 2 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 1
135
WHEREAS, on February 29, 2024 the City’s Draft General Plan document was released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the Draft General Plan Document. Additionally, on March 20, 2024 City staff and Placeworks, Inc. conducted an open house meeting to present and take input on the City’s Draft General Plan update; and WHEREAS, concurrently with the City’s work on the Focused General Plan Update work was also initiated on the City’s 6
th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the City’s 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element presents a framework for meeting the housing needs of existing and future resident populations within the City based on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 2,490 units.

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 2
136
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2022, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued a letter certifying the City’s 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element and noting that the City must continue timely and effective implementation of all programs; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Zoning Ordinance is consistent with, supports, and serves to implements the Land Use Element and Programs 8, 9, 10, and 13 of the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, program 8 commits to rezone sites to address a shortfall of 1,164 units for lower income households to ensure the City’s Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) can be accommodated for all income levels at all times throughout the planning period (2021-2029) no later than three years and 120 days from the statutory deadline (February 12, 2025). Otherwise, the local government’s housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law; and
WHEREAS, program 9 ensures nondiscretionary processing for nonvacant sites that were either 1) identified in the City’s previous housing element, or 2) required rezoning to address a shortfall of sites under program 8; and WHEREAS, program 10 requires replacement housing consistent with state law; and
WHEREAS, program 13 commits to update the zoning ordinance to comply with multiple state laws and implement the City’s General Plan; and WHEREAS, the associated updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinances and Local Coastal Program (LCP) required for consistency with the General Plan are also consistent with, support, and serve to implement the City’s Housing Element inclusive of the “Housing Sites” and “Housing Programs”, and also serve to update the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP consistent with State Housing Laws; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 the City’s Updated Draft General Plan, Draft Zoning Ordinance, and Draft Local Coastal Program, were released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the draft documents; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, August 1, and August 15, 2024 the Planning Commission held multiple duly noticed public hearings to take testimony from staff, the public and other interested parties, and to deliberate on updates to the City’s General Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Element, and revisions to the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP required for consistency and to implement the City’s Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2024 the Planning Commission held a final duly noticed public hearing and completed its deliberations on updates to the City’s General ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 2 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 3
137
Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Elements, and updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP required for consistency and to implement the City’s Housing Element, and took testimony from staff, the public and other interested parties, and considered the associated program Draft Environmental Impact Report and made the following recommendations:

1. That the City Council certify pursuant to CEQA, the Final Program Environmental Impact Report inclusive of its referenced appendices for the “Redondo Beach Focused General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Updates and Local Program Amendments”, approve appropriate findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 4
138
WHEREAS, included as an appendix to the PEIR, Appendix A Buildout Methodology, explains the buildout assumptions and methodologies utilized for projecting the potential growth in the City over the next 25 years to the horizon year of the General Plan Update of 2050; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 an “Amended Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Report” was issued to advise the public and interested parties that the City of Redondo Beach Planning Division had released the Draft PEIR addressing potential impacts associated with the Redondo Beach Focused General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Update and Local Coastal Program Amendment (proposed project) for a 47-day review period beginning on August 1, 2024, and ending on September 16, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 the City’s Updated Draft General Plan, Draft Zoning Ordinance, and Draft LCP, were released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the Draft General Plan Document; and
WHEREAS, the City timely received 18 written comments on the Draft PEIR; and WHEREAS, all comments timely received on the Draft PEIR have been responded to and are included in the Final PEIR, which consists of the Draft EIR, responses to comments timely received on the Draft PEIR, and clarifications/revisions to the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 15, and 29, 2024, and November 5, 2024, the City Council, at duly noticed public hearings, considered the Project and the Draft and Final PEIR, at which times the City staff presented its reports and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Final PEIR; and
WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2024, City Council directed staff to move forward with the Housing Element implementation related General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Local Coastal Program Amendments to comply with the statutory deadline of February 12, 2025 and defer other proposed nonresidential amendments for later consideration. Additionally, City Council directed City staff to include other residential amendments not required by the City’s Housing Element that change residential capacity at the same time as the Housing Element related amendments; and
WHEREAS, multiple technical studies, environmental scoping meetings, community surveys, public meetings and workshops with the GPAC, the general public, the Planning Commission, and the City Council since 2016 have all served to engage and inform the general public including residents, business owners/operators, and other interested parties and have shaped the resulting draft General Plan Update, and the associated Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone, and LCP amendments required for consistency and implementing the Housing Element.

ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 2 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 5
139

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use are consistent with the “Purpose” and procedures pursuant to Redondo Beach Municipal Code Section 10-2.2504 Zoning amendments.

2. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use are consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element.

3. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use are consistent with and serve to implement the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element.

4. The amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use are necessary to facilitate the development of affordable housing in the community consistent with State housing law.

5. The City Council considered the information contained in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use amendments, and the City Council certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2023050732), adopted findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals and findings are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.

SECTION 4. TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE. That the City Council adopt amendments to the Redondo Beach Municipal Code, ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 2 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 6
140
Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use to make consistent and implement the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element as well as other amendments regarding residentially designated properties, which amendments are not identified as program actions in the City’s Housing Element, in accordance with the proposed changes/edits attached as “Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B” (Zoning Map, November 12, 2024).

SECTION 5. SEVERANCE. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this amendment to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of these amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this amendment to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 7
141
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 2 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 8
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2024. _______________________________
James A. Light, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ________________________________ Michael W. Webb, City Attorney Eleanor Manzano, CMC, City Clerk 142
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 2 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 9

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH )
I, Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk of the City of Redondo Beach, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 3282-24 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5
th day of November, 2024 and approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Redondo Beach, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 12th day of November, 2024, and there after signed and approved by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, and that said ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________
Eleanor Manzano, CMC
City Clerk
143
Exhibit A Page | B-1
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
“Exhibit A”
Proposed Amendments to Title 10 Planning and
Zoning, Chapter 2 Zoning and Land Use of the
Redondo Beach Municipal Code.

Amendments to Chapter 2, Zoning and Land Use
Amendments to Article 1, General Provisions
Section 10-2.300, Designation of Zones:

Section 10-2.303, Designation of Zones will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (c) paragraphs (2) and (3) will be amended to read:
(b) Mixed Use.
(3) MU-3 Mixed Use Zones: MU-3, MU-3A, MU-3B, and MU-3C.

Subsection (f) will be amended to read:
(f) Overlay Zones.
(1) (H) Historic Overlay Zone.
(2) (PLD) Planned Development Overlay Zone.
(3) (MU) Mixed-Use Overlay Zone.
(4) (RIV) Riviera Village Overlay Zone.
(5) (AHO) Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
(6) (IF) Industrial Flex Overlay Zone.

Section 10-2.402, Definitions:

The following definitions will be added to or revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) within Section 10-2.402, Definitions:
…
“Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Project” shall mean a development project proposed or developed within an affordable housing overlay zone that qualifies to use the optional standards of the AHO zone and elects to do so. Qualifying projects must meet the requirements of either a Tier 1 or Tier 2 project as follows:
(1) Tier 1. Any project within an AHO zone with a residential component, including transitional housing, supportive housing, and employee housing, that occupies at least 50 percent of the total floor area in the project site.
144
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-2
(2) Tier 2. Any project within an AHO zone that meets the requirements of Tier 1 and also provides at least 20 percent of units affordable to lower-income households. Low Barrier Navigation Centers also quality as a Tier 2 projects.
…
“Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Site” shall mean a site identified in the Housing Element of the General Plan that would be rezoned with an “Affordable Housing Overlay” and represented in the Land Use Element by the residential overlay (-R) General Plan land use designation. On these sites, qualifying AHO Projects may elect to use the regulations and standards of the AHO zone rather than those of the underlying zone.

AHO sites include the following sites identified on the Land Use Plan of the General Plan:
(1) North Tech
(2) South of Transit Center
(3) South Bay Marketplace
(4) Kingsdale
(5) 190th Street, and
(6) FedEx
…
“Employee housing” shall mean qualified employee housing providing accommodation for six or fewer employees, pursuant to the Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5(b). …
“Family” shall mean an individual or two or more persons, related by blood, marriage, or adoption, or a group of not more than five persons, excluding servants, who need not blood, marriage, or adoption, living together in a living together in a dwelling unit, with common access to and common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas within a dwelling unit., but not including limited residential care facilities. …
"Floor area, gross." In calculating gross floor area, all horizontal dimensions shall be taken from the exterior faces of walls, including covered enclosed porches, but not including the area of inner courts or shaft enclosures.
(a) Uses in nonresidential zones. Gross floor area shall mean the floor area of the ground floor and any additional stories, and the floor area of mezzanines, lofts, and basements of a structure. Gross floor area shall not include any area used exclusively for vehicle parking and loading, enclosed vertical shafts, or elevators.
(b) Residential uses in "R" residential zones. Gross floor area shall mean the floor area of the ground floor and any additional stories of all buildings on the lot including accessory buildings. The gross floor area shall include mezzanines and lofts, and garages. Gross floor area shall not include decks, balconies, attics, basements where the finished first floor above the basement (or the roof of the basement where there is no first floor above) is no more than two feet above the existing grade or finished grade, whichever is lower, within the front 40 feet of the lot, or basements not located within the front 40 feet of the lot.
(c) Mixed uses in mixed use and AHO zones. Gross floor area shall mean the floor area of the ground floor and any additional stories of all buildings on the lot including accessory buildings. The gross floor area shall include mezzanines, and lofts. Gross floor area shall not include decks, balconies, 145
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-3
attics, basements where the finished first floor above the basement (or the roof of the basement where there is no first floor above) is no more than two feet above the existing grade or finished grade, whichever is lower, within the front 40 feet of the lot, or basements not located within the front 40 feet of the lot. Gross floor area shall not include any area used exclusively for vehicle parking and loading, enclosed vertical shafts, or elevators. …
“Household” shall mean a family living together in a single dwelling unit, with a common access to, and common use of, all living and eating areas and all areas and facilities for the preparation and storage of food within the dwelling unit all the people who occupy a housing unit. A household includes all related and unrelated people, who share the dwelling unit. A person living alone in a dwelling unit, or a group of unrelated people sharing a dwelling unit are also counted as a household. …
“Household, lower income” shall mean a household making up to 80 percent of the area median income (AMI) as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). …
“Low barrier navigation center” shall mean a housing first, low barrier, temporary, service-enriched shelter focused on helping homeless individuals and families to quickly obtain permanent housing. Low barrier includes best practices to reduce barriers to entry, such as allowing partners, pets, storage of personal items, and privacy.
…
“Mixed use, horizontal” shall mean a project that combines different types of uses within multiple single-use buildings that offer complementary functions as a horizontal mixed use (HMU) project. A HMU project may include apartment buildings, businesses and retail stores all located within the same development site and operating as a cohesive district.
…
“Mixed use, vertical” shall mean a project that combines different types of uses within the same building as a vertical mixed use (VMU) project. A VMU project might include a building with commercial uses on the ground floor and residential or office uses on higher floors. …
"Residential care facility, limited" shall mean 24-hour non-medical care for six or fewer persons in need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living.

This classification includes only those services and facilities licensed by the State of California. …
“Single room occupancy (SRO) housing” shall mean an efficiency unit that (1) is occupied as a primary residence and (2) is subject to state landlord-tenant law pursuant to chapter 2 (commencing with section 1940) of Title 5 of part 4 of division 3 of the Civil Code. The term also includes a unit in an “SRO Project” as described in Title 4 California Code of Regulations Section 10325(g)(3)(H). …
“Supportive housing” shall mean housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in 146
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-4
retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community (as defined by Government Code Section 65582). …
“Target population” shall mean persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health condition, or individuals eligible for service provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 4500) of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, and homeless people. …
“Transitional housing” shall mean a building or buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six (6) months from the beginning of the assistance (as defined by Section 50675.2 of the Health and Safety Code).
…
Amendments to Article 2, Zoning Districts
Section 10-2.500 Specific Purposes, R-1 and R-1A single-family residential zones Section 10-2.500 Specific Purposes, R-1 and R-1A single-family residential zones shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Provide residential areas to be developed exclusively for single-family dwellings, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing, subject to appropriate site and design standards, consistent with the General Plan and with the standards of public health, safety, and welfare established by the Municipal Code;
Section 10-2.501 Land use regulations: R-1 and R-1A single-family residential zones.

The following uses will be added (shown as underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications R-1 R-1A Additional Regulations See Sections:

Residential Uses
Supportive housing P P 10-2.1638
Transitional housing P P
Employee housing P P
Section 10-2.510 Specific Purposes, R-2, R-3A, RMD, and RH multiple-family residential zones.

Section 10-2.510 Specific Purposes, R-2, R-3A, RMD, and RH multiple-family residential zones shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
147
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
P age | B-5
(a) Provide appropriately located areas for multiple-family residential development, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing consistent with the General Plan, and with the standards of public health, safety, and welfare established by the Municipal Code; Section 10-2.511, Land use regulations: R-2, R-3, RMD, and RH multiple-family residential zones.

The following uses and note will be revised and added (shown as strike through and underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications R-2 R-3 R-3A RMD RH-1 RH-2 RH-3
Additional Regulations
See Section:

Residential Uses
2-315 residential units on a lot* P P P P P P P 10-2.1608 416 or more residential units on a
lot* C C C C C C C 10-2.1608
Supportive housing P P P P P P P 10-2.1638
Transitional housing P P P P P P P
Employee housing P P P P P P P
*Maximum number of units per each Zone is established by the applicable Zone’s development standards.

Section 10-2.513 Development standards: R-2 low density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-2.513 Development standards: R-2 low density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined only when all of the requirements of subsections (b)(1) and), (b)(2) of this section are satisfied. (This subsection is not intended to permit the combination of two or more typical or standard-sized lots or to permit developments of a mass and scale inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood.)
(1) One of the following conditions exists:
a. One or more of the lots is less than 5,000 square feet in area, or b.One or more of the lots has no legal access from a public street or alley, or c. One or more of the lots is subject to other unique circumstances such as unusual lot size, shape or topography, and the combining of the lots will help achieve an improved development more consistent with the character of development in the neighborhood; (1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act; and (2) The proposed combination is brought in connection with an applications for Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.

Section 10-2.514 Development standards: R-3 low density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-2.514 Development standards: R-3 low density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to
read: Exhibit A
148
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-6
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined only when all of the requirements of subsections (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section are satisfied. (1) One of the following conditions exists:
a. One or more of the lots is less than 5,000 square feet in area, or b.One or more of the lots has no legal access from a public street or alley, or c. One or more of the lots is subject to other unique circumstances such as unusual lot size, shape or topography, and the combining of the lots will help achieve an improved development more consistent with the character of development in the neighborhood; (1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act; and (1) The proposed combination is brought in connection with an applications for Administrative Design Review Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.

Section 10-2.515 Development standards: R-3a low density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-2.515 Development standards: R-3a low density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined only when the following are satisfied. (1) The front lot line of the combined lots shall not exceed 100 feet, (1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act; and (2) The proposed combination is brought in connection with an applications for Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.

Section 10-2.516 Development standards: RMD medium density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-2.516 Development standards: RMD medium density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined provided that the following requirements are satisfied:
(1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act; and (2) The proposed combination is brought in connection with application an applications for Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.
149
Exhibit A Page | B-7
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-2.517 Development standards: RH-1 high density multiple-family residential zone.

Section 10-2.517 Development standards: RH-1 high density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Section 10-2.518 Development standards: RH-2 high density multiple-family residential zone.

Section 10-2.518 Section 10-2.519 Development standards: RH-2 high density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Section 10-2.519 Development standards: RH-3 high density multiple-family residential zone.

Section 10-2.519 Development standards: RH-3 high density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Lot area per dwelling unit.
(1) The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,556 1,452 square feet of lot area.
(2) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit. The minimum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot that is listed in Table B-2 in the 2021-2029 Housing Element shall be no less than one unit for each 2,179 square feet of lot area.

Section 10-2.530 Specific Purposes, R-MHP mobile home park zone.

Section 10-2.530 Specific Purposes, R-MHP mobile home park zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Maintain and permit improvements to the existing mobile home park, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing, consistent with the General Plan and with the standards of public health, safety, and welfare established by the Municipal Code; Section 10-2.531, Land use regulations: R-MHP mobile home park zone.

The following uses will be added (shown as underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications R-MHP Additional Regulations See Section:

Residential Uses
Supportive housing P 10-2.1638
Transitional housing P
Employee housing P
150
Exhibit A Page | B-8
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-2.640, Land use regulations: C-4, C-4A, and C-4B commercial zones, and C-4-PD pedestrian-oriented commercial zone.

The following uses will be added (shown as underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications C-4 C-4A C-4B C-4-PD
Additional Regulations
See Section:

Other Uses
Single room occupancy housing C 10-2.1640
Section 10-2.900 Specific Purposes, MU-1, and MU-3 mixed-use zones and CR regional commercial zone.

Section 10-2.900 Specific Purposes, MU-1, and MU-3 mixed-use zones and CR regional commercial zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Encourage residential uses, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing, in conjunction with commercial activities in order to create an active street life, enhance the vitality of businesses, and reduce vehicular traffic; Section 10-2.910, Land use regulations: MU-1, MU-3, MU-3A, MU-3B, and MU-3C mixed-use zones, and CR regional commercial zone.

The following uses will be added (shown as underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications MU-1 MU-3
MU-3A
MU-3B
MU-3C CR
Additional Regulations
See Section:

Residential Uses
Supportive housing P P P P 10-2.1638
Transitional housing P P P P
Employee housing P P P P
Other Uses
Low barrier navigation centers P P P P 10-2.1636
Section 10-2.911, Additional Land use regulations: MU-1, MU-3, MU-3A, MU-3B, and MU-3C mixed-use zones, and CR regional commercial zone.

Section 10-2.911, Additional Land use regulations: MU-1, MU-3, MU-3A, MU-3B, and MU-3C mixed-use zones, and CR regional commercial zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential uses. Residential dwelling units may only be located on the second floor and higher of structures developed with commercial uses on the lower levels, with the following exceptions:
(1) MU-1 zone. In the MU-1 zone, lots may be developed exclusively for residential use where the entirety of the block frontage is developed exclusively for residential use. 151
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-9
(2) MU-3A zone. In the MU-3A zone, residential dwelling units may be located on any floor in structures located behind street-facing commercial or mixed-use structures, or above parking on the ground floor in structures located behind street-facing commercial or mixed-use structures. (3) Housing Element Sites subject to rezoning that accommodate units affordable to lower income households. For projects located on parcels identified in Table B-2 of the 2021-2029 Housing Element as accommodating any portion of the City’s low, or very low, income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA), 100 percent residential uses shall be permitted and a minimum of 50 percent of the gross floor area of a mixed-use project that includes housing shall be occupied by residential uses. Floor area shall be calculated as outlined in Section 10-2.1440(b)(2). FAR standards shall not apply to exclusively residential projects, density standards shall apply, including a minimum density of 20 du/ac. Where different standards are noted for commercial and mixed-use projects, the mixed-use standards shall apply to mixed-use and exclusively residential projects.

Section 10-2.913 Development standards: MU-1 mixed-use zone.

Section 10-2.913 Development standards: MU-1 mixed-use zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential density. The maximum number of dwelling units on a lot shall be no more than one unit for each 1,245 1,452 square feet of lot area.

Section 10-2.916 Development standards: MU-3A mixed-use zone.

Section 10-2.916 Development standards: MU-3A mixed-use zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential Density.
(1) Maximum lot area per dwelling unit. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,245 1,452 square feet of lot area. (2) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit. The minimum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot that is listed on Table B-2 in the 2021-2029 Housing Element shall be no less than one unit for each 2,179 square feet of lot area.

Section 10-2.917 Development standards: MU-3B mixed-use zone Section 10-2.918 Development standards: MU-3B mixed-use zone no longer applies to any properties in the City, and shall be removed.

Section 10-2.918 Development standards: MU-3C mixed-use zone.

Section 10-2.918 Development standards: MU-3C mixed-use zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential Density. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,245 1,452 square feet of lot area. 152
Exhibit A Page | B-10
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-2.919 Development standards: CR mixed-use zone.

Section 10-2.919 Development standards: CR mixed-use zone shall be revised (shown as strike-through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential Density. The maximum number of dwelling units on a lot shall be one unit for each 1,245 1,452 square feet of lot area.

Division 14 (AHO) Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Division 14 (AHO) Affordable Housing Overlay Zone shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 2, Zoning Districts:

Section 10-2.1430 Specific purposes, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone In addition to the general purposes listed in Section 10-2.102, the specific purposes of the affordable housing overlay (AHO) zone are to:
(b) Implement the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element and the “-R” Residential Overlay land use category identified in the General Plan Land Use Element, including the following AHO sites:
(1) North Tech
(2) South of Transit Center
(3) South Bay Marketplace
(4) Kingsdale
(5) 190th Street, and
(6) FedEx
(c) Promote the public good by incentivizing the development of housing affordable to lower income households.
(d) Satisfy the City’s RHNA obligation consistent with the City’s Housing Element and State law. (e) Set the minimum density for any residential or mixed-use project that includes residential uses within the AHO Zone.
(f) Establish standards to regulate the development of AHO projects within the AHO Zone that allow for a variety of development scenarios including:
(1) Clustering density to be on portions of a site to allow for existing uses to remain while housing is developed in parking areas.
(2) Tearing down existing structures and redeveloping each site with new buildings that include residential uses only or a combination of residential and other non-residential structures. (3) Reconfiguring the existing structures and expanding existing structures with residential uses. (g) Promote city planning goals of achieving greater socioeconomic diversity and a distribution of affordable housing citywide.
153
Exhibit A Page | B-11
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-2.1432 Applicability, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone (a) Applicants may elect to apply the provisions of this division to AHO projects (see Section 10-2.402 for definition), within an AHO site (see Section 10-2.402 for definition) if the project meets the requirements of an AHO project under either qualifying tier as follows:
(1) Tier 1. Any project within an AHO zone with a residential component, including transitional housing, supportive housing, and employee housing, that occupies at least 50 percent of the total existing or proposed floor area within the project site shall qualify as a Tier 1 project. All provisions of this division shall apply to Tier 1 projects with the exception of Section 10-2.1436(b). (2) Tier 2. Any project within an AHO zone that meets the requirements of Tier 1 and also provides at least 20 percent of units affordable to lower-income households shall qualify as a Tier 2 project.

Low Barrier Navigation Centers also quality as a Tier 2 project. All provisions of this division shall apply to Tier 2 projects.
(b) Projects that do not qualify as an AHO project and any project for which the applicant does not elect to pursue the special regulations or standards allowed by the AHO zone shall be subject to all regulations and standards of the base land use zone (herein referred to as the “underlying” zone), with the following exception:
(1) If the underlying zone allows for residential development, the minimum density established by the AHO overlay (Section 10-2.1444(a)(1)) shall prevail over the minimum density of the underlying zone, if any.

Section 10-2.1434 Relationship to underlying zone, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone (a) Where the AHO zone has been imposed, the regulations and standards of the underlying zone shall remain in full force unless an AHO project is proposed and the applicant has elected to use the provisions of AHO zone, with the following exception:
(1) If the underlying zone allows for residential development, the minimum density established by the AHO overlay (Section 10-2.1444(a)(1)) shall prevail over the minimum density of the underlying zone, if any.
(b) Where the AHO zone has been imposed on an area where another overlay zone exists, regulations and standards of the other overlay zone shall be treated as part of the underlying zone, with the exception of the minimum density as noted in Section 10-2.1434(a)(1). (c) Where imposed, the AHO zone shall be added to the underlying zone designation to establish a new zone designation. The zone of the affected properties shall thereafter be designated on the Zoning Map by the symbol of the underlying zone, followed by the parenthetically enclosed letters of “AHO”.

Section 10-2.1436 Housing and affordability incentives, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone (a) Tier 1 AHO projects. Tier 1 projects are allowed through the establishment of the AHO zone. The AHO zone encourages housing development by allowing for housing in areas of the city where it would not otherwise be permitted including the North Tech, South of Transit Center, South Bay Marketplace, 190th Street, and portions of the Kingsdale AHO sites, and by raising the permitted density for AHO projects, and establishing a minimum density for all residential and mixed-use projects that include residential (applicable on the FedEx and portions of the Kingsdale AHO sites). (b) Tier 2 AHO projects. To encourage the inclusion of housing affordable to lower-income households, Tier 2 projects shall benefit from the same provisions as Tier 1 projects as well as the following:
154
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-12
(1) Tier 2 projects shall be permitted by right, processed through administrative design review per Section 10-2.2500, and approved if all objective standards are met, consistent with State law. (2) The requirement to provide usable public open space per Section 10-2.1444(h) may be reduced to 5%.

Section 10-2.1438 Land Use Regulations, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone In the following schedule the letter "P" designates use classifications permitted in the specified zone and the letter "C" designates use classifications permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit, as provided in Section 10-2.2506. Where there is neither a "P" nor a "C" indicated under a specified zone, or where a use classification is not listed, that classification is not permitted. The "Additional Regulations" column references regulations located elsewhere in the Municipal Code.

Classifications
AHO Sites
North TechSouth of Transit CenterSouth bayMarketplaceKingsdale Additional Regulations See Section:
190th StreetFedEx
Residential Uses
Multi-family residential P P P P P P 10-2.1440(a)/ 10-2.1608 Family day care homes P P P P P P
Family day care home, small P P P P P P
Family day care home, large P P P P P P
Residential care facilities, limited P P P P P P
Senior housing P P P P P P 10-2.1624
Supportive housing P P P P P P 10-2.1638
Transitional housing P P P P P P
Employee housing P P P P P P
Commercial Uses
Home Occupations P P P P P P 10-2.1440(a)
Other Uses
Parking lots C C C C C C 10-2.1440(a)
Parking structures C C C C C C 10-2.1440(a)
Public Open Space P P P P P P 10-2.1440(a)
Low Barrier Navigation Centers P P P P
(C-4
only)
P P 10-2.1636
Section 10-2.1440 Additional Land Use Regulations, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone (a) Residential projects. 100 percent residential projects may be developed on all AHO Sites. 100 percent residential projects may include home occupations, parking lots, parking structures, and public open space. (b) Mixed-use projects. Projects with a mix of residential and non-residential uses may be developed on AHO sites, as follows:
155
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-13
(1) The nonresidential land use regulations shall be consistent with the underlying zone, with the following exceptions:
a. The following uses shall not be permitted as part of an AHO project:

1. Adult businesses

2. Beverage manufacturing

3. Ambulance services

4. Animal grooming; animal hospitals; animal sales.

5. Building material sales

6. Car wash

7. Carpet cleaning plants

8. Construction-related uses

9. Drive-up services associated with any commercial use.

10. Facilities maintenance and construction shops

11. Fire arm sales

12. Food products manufacturing

13. Foundries

14. Furniture manufacturing

15. Government maintenance facilities

16. Heliports and helistops

17. Household products manufacturing

18. Laundries and wholesale dry cleaning plants

19. Machine shops

20. Motion picture and sound studios

21. Maintenance and repair services

22. Manufacturing and fabrication

23. Massage business

24. Mini-warehousing and self-storage

25. Mortuaries

26. Motor vehicle-related uses

27. Pharmaceuticals manufacturing

28. Plant nurseries

29. Recycling collection facilities.

30. Service stations.

31. Sheet metal shops

32. Spray painting businesses

33. Trucking terminals

34. Vehicle sales and services

35. Welding shops

36. Wholesaling/ distribution / storage
(2) A minimum of 50 percent of the gross floor area, existing and proposed, shall be for residential uses.
a. Total floor area. The total floor area shall be calculated per the definition of “Floor Area, Gross” in Section 10-2.402. The total existing and proposed floor area shall combine the floor area for existing uses that are proposed to remain with the floor area for new proposed uses. A site for the purposes of calculating the gross floor area for the project shall be defined as the parcel or assemblage of parcels where the project is proposed. 156
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-14
b. Residential floor area. Residential square footage shall be calculated per the definition of “Floor Area, Gross” for AHO zones in Section 10-2.402. (3) AHO Projects may be configured as a vertical mixed use (VMU) project or a horizontal mixed use (HMU) project as defined in Article 1, Section 10-2.402, Definitions.

Section 10-2.1442 Performance Standards, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone (a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to ensure that new residential uses in AHO zones are not adversely impacted by the commercial or industrial uses within the project or on adjacent properties and existing residential uses adjacent to AHO zones are not adversely impacted by the AHO project, including, but not limited to noise, light and glare, odors, air quality, and safety impacts. In the interests of both the residents and the businesses, no AHO project shall be approved unless the project is designed to meet the following performance standards, in addition to all other applicable regulations of this chapter. (b) Noise. Provisions of Section 10-2.912(a)(1) shall apply. (c) Security. Provisions of Section 10-2.912(a)(2) shall apply. (d) Lighting. Provisions of Section 10-2.912(a)(3) shall apply. (e) Odors, dust, vibrations. Provisions of Section 10-2.912(a)(4) shall apply. (f) Refuse storage and location. Provisions of Section 10-2.912(a)(5) shall apply.

Section 10-2.1444 Development Standards, (AHO) affordable housing overlay zone (a) Residential density.
(1) Minimum density. The minimum number of dwelling units on a lot shall be no less than one unit for each 2,179 square feet of lot area.
(2) Maximum density. The maximum number of dwelling units on a lot shall be no more than one unit for each 792 square feet of lot area.
(b) Clustering density. To allow for the preservation of existing uses while achieving the density of residential uses identified in the Housing Element, clustering of the allowable density shall be permitted for AHO projects as follows:
(1) The maximum units allowed within each AHO Sites may be clustered on individual lots or an assemblage of contiguous lots under common ownership, provided the cumulative density of all parcels within the AHO site does not exceed the maximum density. Units up to the cluster maximum (the maximum units allowed within each AHO site) shall be considered part of the base density before any density bonus. Clustering of density shall be allowed on a first-come basis, to incentivize the production of housing and to allow for residential uses to be clustered in the developable portions of the AHO sites, such as parking areas, while existing uses remain. (2) When a project is submitted for review and consideration, it must identify the maximum units allowed within the AHO Site, the number of entitled and proposed units within the AHO site, separated by base units and those permitted with density bonus (if any) to demonstrate that the total entitled base units combined with the base units of the proposed project do not exceed the cumulative density allowed within the AHO site. The following table identifies the gross acreage of all properties within each AHO site, the maximum density allowed, and the cluster maximum (the maximum units allowed within each AHO site based on the gross acreage and maximum density).
157
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-15
(c) Mixed-use development.
(1) Residential development shall be consistent with Sections 10-2.1444(a) and (b). (2) Overall FAR. The total FAR for all components of a mixed-use project shall not exceed 1.50 FAR.

FAR shall be calculated including both residential and nonresidential uses before any density bonuses are applied.
(d) Minimum lot size, AHO projects. 12,672 square feet of lot area. (e) Building height and stories. No building or structure shall exceed the maximum height (see definition of building height in Section 10-2.402) or number of stories (see definition of story in Section 10-2.402) for each AHO site, as follows:
(1) North Tech: 90 feet / 7 stories maximum.
(2) South of Transit Center: 90 feet / 7 stories maximum. (3) South Bay Marketplace: 90 feet / 7 stories maximum. (4) Kingsdale: 60 feet / 4 stories maximum.
(5) 190th Street: 45 feet / 4 stories maximum.
(6) FedEx: 45 feet/ 4 stories maximum
(f) Setbacks. The minimum setback requirements shall be as follows:
(1) Front setback.
a. Minimum required. There shall be a minimum front setback of 10 feet the full width of the lot, except as follows:

1. Display windows may project three feet into the required front setback provided that the bottom of the projection is no less than three feet above the adjacent sidewalk grade.

2. Unenclosed pedestrian arcades, outdoor dining areas, courtyards, and publicly accessible private open space may project seven feet into the required setback.

3. Where a lot is contiguous to a residentially zoned lot fronting on the same street, the required front setback shall be the same as required for the contiguous residential lot.

AHO Site
Site Size
(gross acres)
Max. Density
(sq.ft./unit)
Cluster Maximum
(Site Size / Max. Density)
North Tech 8.0 792 440
Kingsdale 2.4 792 132
South of Transit Center 6.2 792 341
190th Street 7.9 792 434
South Bay Marketplace 17.2 792 946
FedEx 1.8 792 99
Notes:
• The gross acreage of the overall AHO site shall be rounded to the 10th decimal, as shown here. • Acreage shall be converted to square footage using a conversion factor of 43,560 square feet = 1 acre. 158
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-16
b. Maximum permitted. The front setback shall not exceed 15 feet for 50% of the linear frontage of the building, except areas contiguous with the structure and used for outdoor dining or courtyards shall be exempt from this requirement. No portion of the setback area shall be used for parking.
(2) Side setback.
a. There shall be a minimum side setback of 10 feet the full length of the lot on the street side of a corner or reverse corner lot.
b. No side setback shall be required along the interior lot lines, except where the side lot line is contiguous to a residential zone, in which case the following standards shall apply:

1. The side setback requirement shall be five feet where the lot frontage is less than 75 feet.

2. The side setback requirement shall be six feet where the lot frontage is greater than 75 feet and not more than 100 feet.

3. The side setback requirement shall be 15 feet where the lot frontage is greater than 100 feet and not more than 150 feet.

4. The side setback requirement shall be 20 feet where the lot frontage is greater than 150 feet.
(3) Rear setback. No rear setback shall be required, except where the rear lot line is contiguous to a residential zone, in which case the following standards shall apply:
a. The rear setback shall average no less than 15 feet, but at no point be less than 10 feet. (4) Upper floor setbacks. Within the first 30 feet from the front property line and any property line adjacent to a residential zone, all building elevations above the number of stories noted below for each AHO site shall have a minimum average setback of five feet from the building face of the lower floors. The heights at which upper floor setbacks are required are noted for each AHO site as follows:
a. North Tech:

1. First Upper floor setback: above 3 stories

2. Second Upper floor setback: above 5 stories
b. South of Transit Center:

1. First Upper floor setback: above 3 stories

2. Second Upper floor setback: above 5 stories
c. South Bay Marketplace:

1. First Upper floor setback: above 3 stories

2. Second Upper floor setback: above 5 stories
d. Kingsdale: Upper floor setback above 3 stories.
e. 190th Street: Upper floor setback above 2 stories
f. FedEx: Upper floor setback above 3 stories
159
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-17
(g) Outdoor living space for residential uses. Each dwelling unit shall be provided a minimum of 200 square feet of outdoor living space (see standards for outdoor living space in Section 10-2.1510). (h) Usable public open space. Spaces such as public plazas, public walkways and other public spaces of at least 10% of the FAR shall be provided. Tier 2 AHO sites need only provide 5% of the project’s FAR as usable public open space.
(1) Public open space may be provided on any level of the AHO project, provided it is accessible to the public and not fenced, gated, only accessible through private areas, or otherwise inaccessible to the public.
(2) Public open space shall be contiguous to the maximum extent feasible. (3) Areas less than 10 feet in width shall not count as public open space. (i) Parking requirements. The parking provisions of Article 5 of this chapter shall apply, except that “Overlap parking requirements, nonresidential uses” (Section 10-2.1706 (d)) shall also apply to AHO sites. (j) General regulations. See Article 3 of this chapter. (k) Sign regulations. See Article 6 of this chapter.
(l) Landscaping regulations. See Article 7 of this chapter. (m) Procedures. See Article 12 of this chapter.
(n) The AHO project shall comply with Objective Residential Standards.

Division 15 (IF) Industrial Flex Overlay Zone
Division 14 (AHO) Affordable Housing Overlay Zone shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 2, Zoning Districts:

Section 10-2.1450 Specific purposes, (IF) Industrial Flex Overlay Zone The specific purpose of the IF Industrial Flex overlay zone is to implement the city's General Plan by allowing development that provides for an integrated mix of light industrial and commercial and/or office uses such as:
commercial, research and development, incubator space, creative or technology-based businesses, offices, hotel, and supporting commercial uses. The overall character in this designation is intended to be a creative/tech incubator district with supporting uses. For the purpose of this section, an incubator space is defined as a facility with shared space intended to nurture and accelerate the growth of new businesses. It typically provides resources such as office space, access to shared services and other resources to help entrepreneurs launch their business.

In addition to the general purposes listed above and in Section 10-2.102, the specific purpose of the (IF) Industrial Flex overlay zone is to:
(a) Provide opportunities to integrate new creative or technology-based uses in horizontal or vertical mixed-use developments with commercial, office and hospitality uses; (1) Encourage residential uses in conjunction with other non-residential activities in the IF overlay zone on properties that are also designated with an AHO overlay zone to create a mix of uses that allows for the integration of new residential housing opportunities in close proximity to transit, job centers, and commercial service centers.
160
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-18
(b) Encourage compatibility between residential and commercial and industrial uses in areas where the AHO overlay zones directly abut commercial and industrial zones, by permitting greater design flexibility across the existing boundaries of the zones;
Section 10-2.1452 Applicability, (IF) Industrial Flex overlay zone The area boundary for the Industrial Flex (IF) overlay zone (and underlying land uses) are depicted below.

Section 10-2.1454 Relationship to underlying zone, (IF) Industrial Flex overlay zone. (a) The (IF) Industrial Flex overlay zone may be implemented by the application of one of three zones: CR, I-2 and IC-1 in locations as shown on the map in §10-2.1452. (b) Where imposed, the (IF) industrial flex overlay zone designation shall be added to the underlying zone designation to establish a new zone designation. The zone of the affected properties shall thereafter be designated on the Zoning Map by the symbol of the underlying zone, followed by the parenthetically enclosed letters "IF" or (IF).
(c) Where the (IF) Industrial Flex overlay zone has been imposed, the land use regulations and development standards of the existing land use zone (herein referred to as the "underlying" zone) shall remain in full force, except as follows:
(1) A maximum 1.0 FAR shall apply to all commercial and industrial zones within the IF overlay.

Regional Commercial (CR)
161
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-19
(2) Residential uses shall not be permitted in the underlying (CR) Regional Commercial zones, except for projects meeting the requirements of the (AHO) Affordable Housing overlay zone AHO zone located on properties also designated as AHO (see Division 14). (3) Industrial uses that support smaller, technology and incubator spaces, are permitted.

Industrial (I-2)
(4) ”Manufacturing and fabrication” uses with a conditional use permit. (5) “Construction-related uses” are prohibited.
(6) ”Wholesaling/distribution/storage” are prohibited.
(7) “Motor vehicle-related uses” are prohibited
(8) “Recycling facilities” are prohibited.
(9) “Truck terminals” are prohibited.
(10) “Other industrial uses” are prohibited with the exception of the following:
a. Beverage manufacturing with ancillary retail sales and/or tasting facilities for the public (i.e. craft brewing) with a conditional use permit.
b. Communications facilities with a conditional use permit. c. Warehouse retail with a conditional use permit.
(11) “Commercial Uses” are prohibited with the exception of the following:
a. Ancillary commercial uses per Section 10-2.1011.
b. Hotels and motels with a Conditional Use Permit.
(12) Industrial uses that support smaller, technology and incubator spaces, are permitted.

Industrial (IC-1)
(13) “Manufacturing and fabrication” uses with a conditional use permit. (14) “Construction-related uses” are prohibited.
(15) ”Wholesaling/distribution/storage” are prohibited. (16) “Motor vehicle-related uses” are prohibited.
(17) “Recycling facilities” are prohibited.
(18) “Truck terminals” are prohibited.
(19) “Other industrial uses” are prohibited with the exception of the following:
a. Beverage manufacturing with ancillary retail sales and/or tasting facilities for the public (i.e. craft brewing) with a conditional use permit.
b. Communications facilities with a conditional use permit. c. Warehouse retail and warehouse retail, specialty with a conditional use permit. (20) “Vehicle sales and services” uses are prohibited.
(21) Industrial uses that support smaller, technology and incubator spaces, are permitted. 162
Exhibit A Page | B-20
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-2.1456 Development standards: (IF) overlay zone.

Development standards shall be those of the underlying base zone, except as follows:
(a) Development standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, other than for floor area ratio, may be varied as desirable or essential to accomplish the objectives of this section, pursuant to Planning Commission Design Review (Section 10-2.2502), further provided that such standards are consistent with all applicable requirements of the General Plan.

Amendments to Article 4, Special Use Regulations
Section 10-2.1608 Condominiums
Section 10-2.1608, Condominiums shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) to allow projects with up to 15 units be permitted administratively:

Subsection (c) will be amended to read:
(c) Conditional use permits and design review required. (1) No condominium containing four sixteen or more units shall be established unless a Conditional Use Permit is obtained pursuant to Section 10-2.2506 of this chapter. (2) Condominiums containing four sixteen or more units shall be subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-2.2502.
(3) Condominiums containing two to three fifteen units shall be subject to Administrative Design Review pursuant to Section 10-2.2500.

Section 10-2.1636 Low Barrier Navigation Centers.

Section 10-2.1636 Low Barrier Navigation Centers shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 4, Special Use Regulations:

Section 10-2.1636 Low Barrier Navigation Centers.
(a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this Section is to establish development standards for low barrier navigation centers and to ensure this use is constructed and operated in a manner that is consistent with the requirements and allowances of State law, specifically Article 12 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Planning and Zoning Law commencing with California Government Code Section 65660. (a) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to all low-barrier navigation center projects. Lowbarrier navigation centers are allowed by-right (not subject to a discretionary permit or approval) in areas zoned for mixed-use and nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses, including areas with the affordable housing overlay zone. Low barrier navigation centers must meet the following requirements:
(1) Connected Services. It offers services to connect people to permanent housing through a services plan that identifies services staffing.
(2) Coordinated Entry System. It is linked to a coordinated entry system, so that staff in the interim facility or staff who co-locate in the facility may conduct assessments and provide services to connect people to permanent housing. “Coordinated entry system” means a centralized or coordinated assessment system developed pursuant to Section 576.400(d) or Section 578.7(a)(8), as applicable, of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those sections read on January 1, 163
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-21
2020, and any related requirements, designed to coordinate program participant intake, assessment, and referrals.
(3) Code Compliant. It complies with Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 8255) of Division 8 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(4) Homeless Management Information System. It has a system for entering information regarding client stays, client demographics, client income, and exit destination through the local Homeless Management Information System, as defined by Section 578.3 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Section 10-2.1638 Supportive Housing.

Section 10-2.1638 Supportive Housing shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 4, Special Use Regulations:

Section 10-2.1638 Supportive Housing.
(a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to ensure that housing development projects that meet the definition of supportive housing as defined in California Government Code Section 65650 et seq. are reviewed and processed ministerially pursuant to California Government Code Section 65583(c)(3). (b) Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all supportive housing projects meeting the requirements of California Government Code Section 65650 et seq. (c) Projects allowed by-right. Supportive housing shall be a use by right, subject to administrative design review, in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses, if the proposed development satisfies all of the following requirements:
(1) The development is within a mixed-use zone, AHO zone, or multi-family residential zone. (2) Units within the development are subject to a recorded affordability restriction for 55 years. (3) One hundred percent of the units, excluding the manager unit(s), within the development are dedicated to lower income households and are receiving public funding to ensure affordability of the housing to lower income Californians.
(4) At least 25 percent of the units in the development or 12 units, whichever is greater, are restricted to residents in supportive housing who meet criteria of the target population. If the development consists of fewer than 12 units, then 100 percent of the units, excluding manager unit(s), in the development shall be restricted to residents in supportive housing. (5) Non-residential floor area shall be used for on-site supportive services in the following amounts:

A. For a development with 20 or fewer total units, at least 90 square feet shall be provided for onsite supportive services.

B. For a development with more than 20 units, at least 3 percent of the total nonresidential floor area shall be provided for onsite supportive services that are limited to tenant use, including, but not limited to, community rooms, case management offices, computer rooms, and community kitchens. (6) The developer replaces any dwelling units on the site of the supportive housing development in the manner provided in State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Section 65915(c)(3)(C)).
164
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-22
(7) Units within the development, excluding manager unit(s), include at least one bathroom and a kitchen or other cooking facilities, including, at minimum, a stovetop, a sink, and a refrigerator. (d) Development and Operational Standards. Supportive housing projects shall comply with all the following standards
(1) The project shall comply with applicable Objective Residential Standards, and development standards or policies also required of multifamily developments in the same zone. Supportive housing projects in nonresidential zones where housing is permitted by State law, shall comply with the development standards applicable to the multifamily zone consistent with the density for the project.
(2) The applicant shall submit a plan for providing supportive services, to include all the following items:
a. Documentation that supportive services will be provided on-site. b. The name of the proposed entities that will provide supportive services. c. The proposed funding sources for the services provided. d. Proposed staffing levels.
(3) No minimum parking requirements shall be required for the units occupied by supportive housing residents for projects located within one-half mile of a public transit stop.

Section 10-2.1640 Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing.

Section 10-2.1640 1640 Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 4, Special Use Regulations:

Section 10-2.1640 Single Room Occupancy Housing.
(a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to regulate the development and operation of single room occupancy (SRO) housing. Single room occupancy (SRO) units provide housing opportunities for lowerincome individuals, persons with disabilities, seniors, and formerly homeless individuals. (b) Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all SRO housing projects. (c) Permit required. An SRO housing facility may be approved via a conditional use permit in the following zoning districts:
(1) C-4 commercial zones
(2) C-4A commercial zones
(3) C-4B commercial zones
(4) C-4-PD pedestrian-oriented commercial zones
(d) Relationship to underlying zone. In zoning districts which allow SRO housing with the issuance of a conditional use permit, the regulations contained herein shall be considered additional to those of the underlying zoning district. The provisions of this chapter shall prevail in the event of a conflict with the underlying zoning district regulations.
(e) Development and Operational Standards. SRO housing projects shall comply with all of the following standards:
(1) SRO Units. The following standards apply to single room occupancy units. 165
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-23
a. Unit Size. The minimum size of a unit shall be two hundred (200) square feet, the maximum size of a unit shall be five hundred (500) square feet. b. Bathroom Facilities. An SRO unit is not required to, but may contain, partial or full bathroom facilities. A partial bathroom facility shall have at least a toilet and sink; a full facility shall have a toilet, sink, and bathtub, shower, or bathtub/shower combination.

If a full bathroom facility is not provided, common bathroom facilities shall be provided in accordance with California Building Code for congregate residences with at least one full bathroom per every three units on a floor.
c. Kitchen. An SRO unit may contain partial or full kitchen facilities. A full kitchen includes a sink, a refrigerator, and a stove, range top, or oven. A partial kitchen is missing at least one of these appliances. If a full kitchen is not provided, common kitchen facilities shall be provided with at least one full kitchen per floor.
d. Closet. Each SRO shall have a separate closet with at least four (4) square feet of closet space with an unobstructed height of at least five feet for use by the occupant. e. Access. Exterior doors and windows accessible from outside the SRO unit must have working locks for privacy. The occupant must be able to access the unit without going through any other unit. Each unit must have immediate access to two or more means of exit from the building appropriately marked and leading to safe and open space at ground level.
f. Code Compliance. All SRO units shall comply with all requirements of the California Building Code.
(2) SRO Facilities. The following standards apply to single room occupancy buildings. a. Density. A single room occupancy facility is not required to meet density standards of the general plan.
b. Common Area. Four square feet of interior common space per unit shall be provided, with at least two hundred (200) square feet in area of interior common space, excluding janitorial storage, laundry facilities, and common hallways. All common areas shall comply with all applicable ADA accessibility and adaptability requirements. c. Bathroom Facilities. If private bathing facilities are not provided for each unit, shared shower or bathtub facilities shall be provided in accordance with the most recent edition of the California Building Code for congregate residences with at least one full bathroom (including toilets, sinks, and bathing facilities) per every three units on a floor.

The shared shower or bathtub facility shall be accessible from a common area or hallway. Each shared shower or bathtub facility shall be provided with an interior lockable door.
d. Laundry Facilities. Laundry facilities shall be provided in a separate room at the ratio of one washer and dryer for every ten (10) units.
e. Cleaning Supply Room. A cleaning supply room or utility closet with a wash tub with hot and cold running water shall be provided on each floor of the SRO facility. f. Management Plan. A management plan shall be submitted with the development application for an SRO facility and shall be approved by the community development director or his/her assigned. The management plan must address management and 166
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-24
operation of the facility, rental procedures, safety and security of the residents and building maintenance.
g. Facility Management. An SRO facility with ten (10) or more units shall have an on-site manager. An SRO facility with less than ten (10) units shall provide a management office on-site.
h. Parking. Parking shall be provided for an SRO facility at a rate of one parking space per unit plus an additional space for the on-site manager.
i. Accessibility. All SRO facilities shall comply with all applicable ADA accessibility and adaptability requirements.
j. Existing Structures. An existing structure may be converted to an SRO facility, consistent with the provisions of this section.

Amendments to Article 5, Parking Regulations
Section 10-2.1704 Residential parking standards
Section 10-2.1704 Residential parking standards will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) paragraph (2) will be amended to read:
(2) Multiple-family dwellings. Multiple-family dwellings on the same lot shall provide parking spaces for each dwelling unit based on the size of each unit as follows: 1 parking space for each studio/0-bedroom unit, 1.5 parking space for each 1-bedroom unit, and 2 parking spaces for each unit with two or more bedrooms. a minimum of two parking spaces for each dwelling unit, of which at At least one space per dwelling unit shall be within an enclosed private or common parking garage.

Section 10-2.1706 Commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential parking standards Section 10-2.1706 Commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential parking standards will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Use Spaces Required
Emergency shelters: One space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. One parking space per employee on site at the same time.

SRO facility: One parking space per unit plus an additional space for the on-site manager.

Amendments to Article 9, Density Bonuses
Existing language in Article 9 (Sections 10-2.2100 – 10-2.2112), Density Bonuses will be repealed and replaced (replacement language is shown as underlined text) with the following:

Section 10-2.2100 Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to encourage the development of affordable housing in accordance with State law.

State Density Bonus Law, codified in Government Code Section 65915, et seq., provides that a local government shall grant affordable housing benefits as defined in paragraph 2102 of this section, if requested by the applicant and consistent with the applicable requirements of this section, to a developer of a qualified housing development.

This “Article” establishes the procedural process to implement State Density Bonus Law. 167
Exhibit A Page | B-25
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-2.2101 State law incorporated.

The provisions of this Chapter are intended to comply with State Density Bonus Law. In the event that any provision of this Chapter conflicts with Government Code Section 65915 or any related State law(s), the State law(s) shall apply.

Section 10-2.2102 Definitions.

The definition of terms shall be as provided in Government Code Section 65915, et seq. In addition, the following definitions shall control over any conflicting definitions in other Sections of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code.

State law definitions, as they may be amended from time to time, control over the definitions in this section. (a) “Affordable Housing Benefits” means one or more the of the following, as defined in Government Code Section 65915:
a. A density bonus;
b. An incentive or concession;
c. A development standard waiver or modification; and
d. A parking standard modification.
(b) “Applicant” means the applicant or permittee of a Qualified Housing Development and its assignees or successors in interest.
(c) “Director” means the City’s Community Development Director or designee. (d) “Qualified Housing Development” means a housing development that meets the threshold eligibility for Affordable Housing Benefits, as identified in Government Code Section 65915.

Section 10-2.2103 Target Rents and Mortgage Payments.

Target rents and Mortgage payments shall be as provided in Government Code Section 65915.

Section 10-2.2104 Affordability Requirements and Construction of Affordable Units. (a) The affordability requirements shall be as provided in Government Code Section 65915. (b) The affordable units that qualify the project as a Qualified Housing Development must be constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of any market rate units.

Section 10-2.2104 Application Required.

An applicant seeking any Affordable Housing Benefits under this Article must comply with all of the following:
(a) The applicant shall file an application for a Density Bonus Permit on a form approved by the Director concurrently with the applications for any other land use permits or approvals that may be required for the project.
(b) The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City pursuant to Section 10-2.2108, to maintain and enforce the affordable housing component of the housing development. (c) Contents of Application. The application for a Density Bonus Permit shall include the following information:
(1) A description of the project, including the gross acreage of the parcel(s), the total number of proposed dwelling units, the number of affordable units and level of affordability for each 168
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-26
affordable unit proposed to be included in the project, and the location, design, and phasing of all units;
(2) A breakdown of the current and proposed general plan and zoning designations, and the maximum allowable residential density (as defined in State law); (3) In applications involving the donation of land and/or childcare facilities, the location of such land and/or facilities and a detailed description of compliance with the conditions and definitions in State law;
(4) A calculation of the density bonus allowed pursuant to State law, including the percentage of density bonus, percentage of income-restricted units, and number of density bonus units being proposed over and above the maximum allowable residential density; (5) A description of the incentives or concessions requested (if any), including a detailed explanation as to how the request will enable the applicant to provide housing at the target rents or mortgage payments;
(6) A description of the waivers or reductions of development standards requested (if any), including identification of each specific development standard from which the applicant seeks to deviate and a detailed explanation as to how the application of the development standard would physically preclude the development of a development meeting the eligibility criteria at the densities or with the concessions or incentives permitted by State law; (7) The proposed method of ensuring the continued affordability of all income-restricted units, for the applicable time period(s) in State law;
(8) Other relevant information as required by State law; and (9) Other information identified on the City’s application form that may be required to ensure compliance with State law.
(d) An application for a Density Bonus permit will not be processed until it complies with all of the provisions of this Section as determined by the Director and shall be processed concurrently with other required entitlements for the project. Prior to the submittal of an application for a Qualified Housing Development, an applicant may submit to the Director a preliminary proposal for Affordable Housing Benefits. (e) Approval of a Density Bonus permit shall be at the same level as the planning entitlement action for the project with the highest requirement.

Section 10-2.2105 Review of Requested Affordable Housing Benefits (a) The City shall grant a density bonus to a Qualified Housing Development in the amount specified by Government Code Section 65915.
(b) If requested, the City shall grant a parking ratio reduction to a Qualified Housing Development in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 65915. (c) The City shall grant the specific concession(s) or incentive(s) requested by the Applicant, unless it makes any of the relevant written findings stated in Government Code Section 65915(d). Senior citizen housing developments that qualify for a density bonus shall not receive any incentives or concessions, unless Government Code Section 65915 is amended, to specifically require that local agencies grant incentives or concessions for senior citizen housing developments.
(d) The City shall grant a requested waiver or reduction of a development standard, unless it finds that:
169
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-27
(1) The application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant; (2) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;
(3) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or (4) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or federal law. (e) The granting of any Affordable Housing Benefit shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary approval; (f) This Section does not limit or require the provision of direct financial incentives for the housing development, including the provision of publicly owned land, by the City or the waiver of fees or dedication requirement, except as otherwise provided by State law.

Section 10-2.2106 Appeals
(a) If the decision to approve or deny an application for an Affordable Housing Benefit is made by the Director of Planning Commission, any person may appeal the decision. The appeal shall be in writing, state the grounds for appeal, and shall be filed with the City Clerk including the applicable fee, within 15 calendar days of the date of the mailing of the Director’s decision or Commission hearing date. The decision of the City Council shall be final.
(b) If the decision to approve or deny an application for an Affordable Housing Benefit is made by the Director or his/her assigned, then an appeal may be filed with the Planning Commission. If the decision is made by Planning Commission, then an appeal may be filed to the City Council. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section10-2.2108, if the determination of the underlying application for the Qualified Housing Development is also appealed along with the decision of the Affordable Housing Benefit, then the entire project shall be controlled by the appeal procedures applicable to the underlying application.

Section 10-2.2108, Affordable Housing Agreement and Equity Sharing Agreement A building permit for a Qualified Housing Development shall only be issued if and when the Applicant, or its designee, enters into an affordable housing agreement and, if applicable, an equity sharing agreement, with the City or its designee pursuant to, in compliance with, and to implement this Section and State law. The agreements shall be in the form approved by the City which shall contain terms and conditions mandated by, or necessary to implement, State law and this Article. The Director may designate a qualified administrator or entity to administer the provisions of this section on behalf of the City. The affordable housing agreement shall be recorded prior to, or concurrently with, final map recordation or, where the Qualified Housing Development does not include a map, prior to issuance of a building permit for any structure on the site. The Director is hereby authorized to enter into the agreements authorized by this section on behalf of the City upon approval of the agreements by City Attorney for legal form and sufficiency.
170
Exhibit A Page | B-28
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Amendments to Article 12, Procedures
Section 10-2.2500 Administrative Design Review.

Section 10-2.2500 Administrative Design Review shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Purpose. The purpose of Administrative Design Review is to enable the Community Development Director or his/her assigned to review minor development projects that otherwise meet the zoning regulations, in terms of the appropriateness of the design. The Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall review:
(1) All new single-family residences;
(2) All additions to existing single-family residences where the combined addition is greater than 500 square feet of gross floor area to the dwelling and/or any accessory building; (3) All additions to existing single-family residences that entail expansion of floor area above the first story;
(4) All additions of less than 1,000 gross square feet to multiple-family residential developments containing four or more units;
(5) All floor area additions to residential developments containing two to three units; (6) All new residential developments containing two to three fifteen units on any lot, subject to a notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section. Any two to three fifteen unit development involving more than two adjacent lots shall be subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-2.2502;
(7) The addition of an accessory dwelling unit or the addition of two units on a lot that already contains an existing single-family residence (see definition of accessory dwelling unit in Section 10-2.402);
(8) The addition of a third (3rd) unit on a lot that already contains two units; (9) All Tier 2 AHO projects, which shall be allowed by-right and approved if all objective standards are met, consistent with State law.
(10) All housing development projects in which at least 20 percent of the units are dedicated for lower income households and are located on properties identified in appendix B of the 2021- 2029 Housing Element meeting the requirements of either (a) or (b) below, which shall be allowed by-right and approved if all objective standards are met, consistent with State law. a. Housing Element - Reused Sites. The proposed project site is i) listed on Table B-1 in the 2021-2029 Housing Element, ii) identified as a site used in a prior housing element, iii) not listed as vacant, and iv) satisfies any portion of the City’s lower income RHNA requirement.
b. Housing Element - Rezoned Sites. The proposed project site is i) listed on Table B-2 in the 2021-2029 Housing Element and identified in Table B-2 as satisfying any portion of the City’s low- or very low-income RHNA requirement.
(11) All other development not subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-2.2502.
171
Exhibit A Page | B-29
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Subsection (b), paragraph (7) will be amended to read:
(7) The project shall comply with the Objective Residential Standards adopted by resolution of the City Council. If there is a conflict between “Criteria” (1) through (6) with the Objective Residential Standards, the Objective Residential Standards shall prevail.

Subsection (e) will be amended to read:
(e) Notice of pending decision. Notice of a pending decision by the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall be given as follows for all non-residential development under subsection (a)(9) and for new multiple-family developments. For purposes of this section, new multiple-family developments shall mean development of two or three dwelling units on a vacant lot or in conjunction with demolition of 50% or more of the total floor area of existing development on the lot. New development shall not include an "accessory dwelling unit" as defined in Section 10-2.402. (1) By mailing a written notice thereof, not less than 10 working days prior to the date of pending approval to the applicant, to the owner of the subject property and to the owners of properties within 300 feet of the exterior boundary of the subject property or properties; such notices shall be sent by first class mail, with postage prepaid, using the addresses from the last adopted tax roll, if available;
(2) By posting such notice in at least one prominent place on or about each parcel which is the subject of the proposed action, or upon utility poles or sticks along or about the street line of such parcel; and
(3) The content of the notice of pending decision for an Administrative Design Review shall contain the following information:
a. The date of filing of the application and the name of the applicant, b. The file number assigned to the application,
c. A description of the proposed development and its location, d. The date at which the application is expected to be approved, and e. A statement that revisions to the proposed project will be considered by the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned upon the written request of any person provided that such written request is received by the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned within 10 working days from the date of sending the notice.

Subsection (f) will be amended to read:
(f) Decision on application. The Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall review the application and shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Projects meeting the requirements of Section 10-2.2500 (a)(9) or (10) shall be approved if found in compliance with the applicable objective standards per Criteria (7).
(1) If the decision of the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned is to approve the application, an approval stamp shall be affixed to the plans. (2) If the approval requires conditions, the conditions will be made part of the approved plans. (3) If the project requires a notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, no decision will be made until completion of the deadline for written requests for revisions. If no written request for revisions is received, the Planning Community Development Director or 172
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-30
his/her assigned shall make a decision pursuant to this subsection. If a written request for revisions has been received prior to the deadline, notice of the decision shall be mailed by first class mail within seven days of the decision to the applicant and the person that provided the written request for revisions to the proposed project.
(4) If the decision of the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned is to deny the application, the decision shall be in writing and shall recite the failure to meet the criteria upon which the decision is based. Where the decision is to deny the application, notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant by first class mail within seven days of the decision.

Subsection (i) will be amended as follows – there are no changes to paragraphs (1) through (3):
(i) Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission. Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider an appeal of the decision of the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall be given as follows:

Subsection (m) will be amended as follows:
(m) Expiration. An approval subject to Administrative Design Review shall become null and void unless vested within 36 months after the date of the approval. Such time limits may be extended by the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned upon the written request of the applicant and the presentation of proof of an unusual hardship not of the applicant's own making. If an established time limit for development expires, and no extension has been granted, the approval, and all rights and privileges established therein, shall be considered null and void.

Subsection (n) will be amended as follows – there are no changes to paragraphs (1) through (7):
(n) Revocation. After notice to the applicant and subject to appeal to the Planning Commission, the Planning Community Development Director or his/her assigned may revoke or modify any Administrative Design Review approval issued on one or more of the following grounds:

Section 10-2.2502 Planning Commission Design Review.

Section 10-2.2502 Planning Commission Design Review shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a)(1)(b) will be amended to read:
b. Any new multi-family residential development containing four sixteen or more units on any lot and/or any new multi-family residential development on a project site involving more than two residential lots that do not meet the requirements of Section 10-

2.2500(a).

Subsection (a)(7) will be added as follows:
(7) Industrial Flex (IF) overlay zone. Any new development in the Industrial Flex (IF) zone. This excludes qualifying AHO projects as defined in Division 14 that meet the requirements of Section 10-2.2500 (a).

New Section 10-2.2522 Reasonable Accommodation.

Section 10-2.2522 Reasonable Accommodation shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 12, Procedures:

Section 10-2.2522 Reasonable Accommodation.
(a) Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose of this chapter, in compliance with the fair housing laws, to provide a procedure to evaluate requests for reasonable accommodation related to specific applications of the zoning 173
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-31
law in order to ensure that no person is discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, national origin, source of income, or ancestry, as required by federal and/or State law, by being denied an equal opportunity to use and enjoy their dwelling and to authorize the application of exceptions to the city's zoning law and land development standards, if warranted.
(b) Application
(1) Any person, business, or organization may submit an application for reasonable accommodation to the city's residential development standards by submitting an application to the city's Community Development Director, or his or her designee, on a form provided by the city. (2) The following information shall be provided in the application:
a. The applicant's name, mailing address and daytime phone number(s) (and/or representatives) if so applicable;
b. Notarized written consent of the owner of the subject property if the applicant is not the owner;
c. The address of the property for which the request is being made; d. The specific zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy of the city from which relief is sought;
e. An explanation of why the specified zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy is preventing, or will prevent, the applicant's use and enjoyment of the subject property; f. The nature of the accommodation requested;
g. A site plan or illustrative drawing showing the proposed accommodation; and h. The basis for the claim that the fair housing laws consider the applicant as protected (applicant should submit a letter from a medical doctor, handicap license, or other similar supportive evidence).
(c) Filing and Appeal Fees
(1) A filing fee or an appeal fee, as applicable and in the amounts established by city council resolution, shall be paid at the time of the filing of an application or at the time of filing an appeal pursuant to this chapter.
(2) If an applicant requires assistance in completing the application, the city shall provide reasonable assistance to ensure that the application process is accessible to the applicant. (d) Determination of application
(1) The request for reasonable accommodation shall be considered by the Community Development Director, who may deny, approve or conditionally approve the request. (e) Findings
(1) The following findings shall be made, and the Community Development Director shall approve an application upon a showing of all of the following:
a. The person who will use the subject property is protected under the fair housing laws; b. The requested exception to the zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy is necessary to make specific housing available to persons occupying the subject property; 174
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-32
c. The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the city; and
d. The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration of the city's zoning or building laws, policies and/or procedures.
(f) Notice of decision
(1) Within thirty (30) days after acceptance of a complete application for reasonable accommodation the Community Development Director, shall provide the applicant with written notification of the decision regarding the request, including any reasonable conditions. (g) Appeal
(1) Appeal of decision of the Community Development Director. Within ten (10) days of the date of any decision made pursuant to this section, any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the Community Development Director in granting or denying a request for reasonable accommodation may appeal the decision to the Planning Commission.
(2) Appeal of decision of the Planning Commission. Within ten (10) days of the date of any decision made pursuant to this section, any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the Planning Commission in granting or denying a request for reasonable accommodation may appeal the decision to the City Council and no further.

NEW Article 13, Housing Replacement Obligations and Occupant Protections Required for New Development Projects
A new Article 13 shall be added to Chapter 2 (shown as underlined text) to address for replacement housing required by State law:

Article 13, Housing Replacement Obligations and Occupant Protections Required for New Development Projects
Section 10-2.2600 Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to require housing replacement consistent with State Housing Law including Government Code Sections 66300.5-66300.6 and 65583.2(g)(3). This “Article” implements the provisions of those statutes.

Section 10-2.2601 State law consistency
The provisions of this Article are intended to comply with Government Code Sections 66300.5 et. seq and 65583 et. seq and related State laws. In the event that any provision of this Article conflicts with Sections 66300.5- 66300.6 and 65583.2(g)(3) or any related State laws, the State law(s) shall apply.

Section 10-2.2602 Definitions
The definition of terms shall be as provided in Government Code Section 66300.5. In addition, the following definitions shall control over any conflicting definitions in other sections of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code. State law definitions, as they may be amended from time to time, control over the definitions in this section. (a) Complete application. refers to a complete application pursuant to Section 65943 of the California Government Code.
175
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | B-33
(b) Housing development project. shall have the same meaning as defined in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 65905.5 of the California Government Code,
(c) Protected units. has the same meaning as set forth in California Government Code Section 66300.5.

Section 10-2.2603 Applicability
(a) Unless otherwise required by Government Code Section 66300 et seq. or another provision of State law, this article shall apply only to housing development projects that submit a preliminary application prior to January 1, 2030, or a complete application prior to January 1, 2034. This article shall not apply to a housing development project that submitted a complete application to the City before January 1, 2020. (b) For any development project that does not fall within paragraph (a), and unless otherwise required by Government Code Section 66300 et seq. or another provision of State law, this article shall apply if the applicant submits a complete application for planning entitlements and/or a building permit (if no planning entitlements are required), along with any associated submittal fee, on or after January 1, 2024 but before January 1, 2030
Section 10-2.2604 Replacement Obligations and Occupant Protections Required for New Development Projects
(a) The City shall not approve any land use entitlement or issue a building permit for a housing development project that will require the demolition of one or more residential dwelling units unless the project will create at least as many residential dwelling units as will be demolished. (b) The City shall not approve any land use entitlement or issue a building permit for a development project that will require the demolition of occupied or vacant protected units, or where protected units were demolished after January 1, 2020, unless the housing development project meets all of the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66300.6 and 65583.2(g)(3). (c) Housing development projects must replace the units on site. Replacement units for non-residential projects may be located on a site other than the project site but shall be located within the same jurisdiction and the applicant may contract with another entity to develop the required replacement housing.

Section 10-2.2606 Sunset Provision
(a) This article shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2034, and as of that date is repealed. (b) A development project that submits a preliminary application pursuant to Section 65941.1 of the California Government Code before January 1, 2030, remains subject to this article after January 1, 2030 176

HIGH LN

RIPLEY AVE

PALM LN

HARKNESS LN

WOLLACOTT ST

GRANT AVE FORD AVE RINDGE LN

ROBINSON ST

GOODMAN AVE

JOHNSTON AVE

PERKINS LN
S. PROSPECT AVE

FLAGLER LN

HERRIN ST

FISK LN

VAN HORNE LN

BLOSSOM LN

HUNTINGTON LN

AVENUE C
S. IREN
A
AVE
S. GUADALU
PE AVE

AVIATION BLVD

MACKAY LN

KNOB HILL AVE

EARLE ST
S. LUCIA AVE

BELMONT LN
S. FRA
N
CISC
A
AVE

ROCKEFELLER LN

VAIL AVE
160TH ST

DEL AMO ST

MEYER LN

FISHERMAN'S
WHARF

VINCENT ST

SLAUSON LN

MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD

AVENUE B
190TH ST
N. PACIFIC COAST HWY

PEARL ST

RALSTON LN
EL
REDON
D
O
N. HARBOR
DRIVE

EMERALD ST

AVENUE I

DOW AVE

ANITA ST

PULLMAN LN

DIAMOND ST

ARTESIA BLVD

LOMAX LN

AVENUE G
S. PACIFIC
COAST
H
W
Y

FELTON LN
CAMINO
REAL

INGLEWOOD AVE

AVIATION WAY

ORMOND LN

TOPAZ ST

ARMOUR LN
M
CBAIN
AVE

MARSHALLFIELD LN

DIXON ST
S. ELEN
A
AVE

BELAND BLVD

WYLIE LN

REYNOLDS LN

GREEN LN

FELTON AVE

FIRMONA AVE

PHELAN LN

RUBY ST

MAY AVE

PRUITT DR
N. PRO
S
PECT
AVE

TORRANCE BLVD

GRAHAM AVE

GATES AVE

CURTIS AVE

VOORHEES AVE

RUHLAND AVE

NELSON AVE

CARNEGIE LN

MATHEWS AVE

VANDERBILT LN

PALOS VERDES BLVD

BERYL ST

HARRIMAN LN

VI N C E
NT PK
S. JUANITA
AVE

ESPLANADE

AVIATION PL

SAPPHIRE
ST
182ND ST
LILIEN

THAL LN
N. CATALINA
AVE

CARNELIAN
ST
JULIA
AVE

SERPENTINE ST

IVES LN

HAYNES LN

GIBSON PL
KIN
GSD
ALE
AVE

SPEYER LN
N. BROADWAY
AVE

GARNET ST
CAMINO
DE
LA
COSTA

OPAL ST
Y
NEZ
AVE
S. CATALIN
A
AVE

AVENUE A

SPENCER ST
6TH ST
7TH PL
N. IRENA AVE

FAYE LN

SUSANA AVE

AVENUE E

AVENUE D

AVENUE F

AVENUE H

BLAISDELL AVE
N. LUCIA AVE
N. GERTRUDA
AVE

CLARK LN

PERRY AVE

CARVER ST

FARRELL AVE

ERNEST AVE

WARFIELD AVE

BATAAN RD

DUFOUR AVE

STANFORD AVE

PLANT AVE

HAWTHORNE BLVD

STEINHART AVE
183RD ST
182ND PL
S. GERTRU
D
A
AVE

SPRECKELS LN

ALVORD LN

SANTA FE AVE

REDONDO BEACH AVE
S. B
R
O
A
D
W
AY
AVE
185TH ST

SPACE PARK DR
184TH ST
JU
D
Y
DR
11TH ST

MARINE AVE

FABER ST

REED ST

TIMOTHY
AVE

HARPER AVE

RITA ST

BARKLEY LN

MORGAN LN

CARLSON LN

HAVEMEYER LN

CENTRAL
C
T
159TH ST
N. PAULINA AVE

MIRAMAR DR
10TH ST

HILL LN
N. MARIA AVE
N. ELENA AVE
N. JUANITA AVE

NEW HIGH CT

AMETHYST ST
N. GUADALUPE
AVE
E
LVIRA
AVE

AGATE ST
S
. S
U
NSET
CT

CLUSTER LN

SEAHAWK
WAY
S. MARIA
AVE

VILLAGE DR
VARGAS
WAY
A
M
Y LN

PACIFIC AVE
9TH ST
8TH ST

AXENTY WAY

BURRITT AVE
N. HELBE
RTA
AVE

SEBALD AVE
N. FRANCISCA
AVE
7TH ST

CONDON AVE
S. HELBERTA
AVE

HERONDO ST

HOPKINS WAY

PORTOFINO
WAY
GEO
R

GE FREETH WY

SIMON RAMOS DR

DOOLITTLE DR

PINCKARD AVE

WHITE CT
405 FWY
C-1
C-1
C-1
C-1 C-1
C-1
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2 C-2 C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2
C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2
C-2
C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2
C-2 C-2
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD
C-2-PD C-2-PD C-2-PD C-2-PD
C-2-PD C-2-PD C-2-PD C-2-PD
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2-PD(RIV)
C-2
(AHO)
C-2(RIV)
C-2B
C-2B
C-2B
C-2B
C-2B
C-2B
C-2B
C-3
C-3 C-3
C-3 C-3
C-3
C-3
C-3
C-3
C-3
C-3-PD(RIV)
C-3-PD(RIV)
C-3-PD(RIV)
C-3-PD(RIV)
C-3-PD(RIV) C-3-PD(RIV)
C-3A
C-3B
C-4
C-4
C-2A
C-2A
C-4
C-4
C-4
C-4-PD(RIV)
C-4-PD(RIV)
C-4-PD(RIV)
C-4-PD(RIV) C-4-PD(RIV)
C-4
(AHO)
C-4 (AHO)
C-4 (AHO)
C-4(RIV)
C-4A
C-4A
C-4A C-4A
C-5A
C-5A
CC-1
CC-2
CC-3
CC-4
CC-4
CC-4
CC-4
CC-5
CR

CR (IF-AHO)

CR (IF)

CR (IF)
I-1
I-1
I-1
I-1A
I-1B
I-2
I-2 (AHO)
I-2
(AHO) I-2
(AHO)
I-2 (IF-AHO)
I-2 (IF)
I-2A
IC-1
IC-1
IC-1
IC-1 (IF-AHO)
IC-1 (IF)
MU-2
MU-1
MU-3
MU-3
MU-3 MU-3
MU-3A
MU-3A
MU-3A
MU-3A
(AHO)
C-3B
MU-3C(RIV)
P-CF
P-CF
P-CF
P-CF
P-CF
P-CF
P-CF
P-CIV
P-GP
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-CF
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
CC-4
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO

P-PRO P-PRO P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO

P-PRO P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW

P-ROW P-ROW P-ROW P-ROW
P-ROW

P-ROW P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW

P-RVP(RIV)
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F

P-S F P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
C-2 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 (PLD)
R-1 (PLD)
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A R-1A R-1A
R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A
R-1A R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-1A R-1A R-1A
R-1A
R-1A
R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2
R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 (PLD)
R-3(H)
R-3A R-3A R-3A
R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A R-3A
R-3A R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A
R-3A(H)
R-MHP
RH-2
RH-2 RH-2
RH-3
RH-3
RH-3
RH-3
RH-3
RH-3
RH-3 (AHO)
RH-3 (AHO)
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD

RMD RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD

RMD RMD

RMD RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD

RMD RMD RMD

RMD(PLD)

RMD(PLD)
ROW
ROW
ROW
ROW
C-2B
C-2B
R-1
R-1A
R-2
R-3
R-3A
RMD
RH-2
RH-3
R-MHP
C-1
C-2
C-2-PD
C-2A
C-2B
C-3
C-3-PD
C-3A
C-3B
C-4
C-4-PD
C-4A
C-5A
CC-1
CC-2
CC-3
CC-4
CC-5
MU-1
MU-1a
MU-2
MU-3
MU-3A
MU-3B
MU-3C
CR
I-1
I-1A
I-1B
I-2
I-2A
IC-1
P-CIV
P-RVP
P-GP
P-ROW
P-CF
P-PRO
P-SF
ROW
Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO)
Zoning Map
Ove rlay zone s, w h e re applie d are d e note d in pare nth e se s follow ing th e base zone d e signations. Wh e re tw o ove rlay zone s are applie d , th e y are se parate d by a h y ph e n.

Ove rlay zone s includ e :
• (PLD) Planne d d e ve lopm e nt ove rlay zone
• (Riv) Rivie ra Village ove rlay zone
• (H) Historic ove rlay zone
• (AHO) Afford able h ousing ove rlay zone
• (IF) Ind ustrial fle x ove rlay zone
City of Re d ond o Be ach Date : 10/24/2024
0 600 1,200 1,800
Fe e t
November 12, 2024
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3282-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND LAND USE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT
Exhibit B
177
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING
AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN

IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH

MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED
6 TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND

OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY

DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM
ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

WHEREAS, the City’s current General Plan was adopted on May 26, 1992; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2016 the City Council approved the City’s three-year Strategic Plan goal to “Ensure sustainability, livability, and health by completing the General Plan update and by implementing environmentally responsible programs”; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2016, the City Council awarded the contract for planning and environmental consulting services to Placeworks, Inc. for updates to the “Land Use Element” and “Conservation, Recreation and Parks, and Open Space Element” of the City’s General Plan and preparation of the required environmental documents; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016 the City Council approved Resolution No. CC1612-122 establishing a 27-member General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) to provide direct community stakeholder input to the update of the Land Use and Conservation, Recreation and Parks, and Open Space Elements of the General Plan including analysis and recommendations regarding amendments to the Mixed-Use Zoning and Development Standards, and opportunities for additional recreation, parks, and open space areas; and
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2017 pursuant to Resolution No. CC-1612-122, the Mayor and City Council selected the members of the GPAC and the City Clerk reviewed all selections and confirmed each was a resident of Redondo Beach. Two (2) members were appointed by the Mayor, one (1) of whom served as the Chair, and each Council Member appointed five (5) members, three (3) of whom resided in their District; and WHEREAS, the GPAC conducted a total of twenty-eight (28) noticed public meetings since April 27, 2017, with their final meeting being held on January 31, 2024. At the final meeting, GPAC completed their discussions and recommendations for the final draft focused General Plan, which includes a consistently formatted, comprehensive General Plan document with a new Introduction, along with updated Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures for the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety, and Noise Elements; and
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 1
178
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 2
WHEREAS, on February 29, 2024 the City’s Draft General Plan document was released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the Draft General Plan Document. Additionally, on March 20, 2024 City staff and Placeworks, Inc. conducted an open house meeting to present and take input on the City’s Draft General Plan update; and WHEREAS, concurrently with the City’s work on the Focused General Plan Update work was also initiated on the City’s 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the City’s 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element presents a framework for meeting the housing needs of existing and future resident populations within the City based on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 2,490 units.

While the RHNA allocation is 2,490 units, when accounting for a credit of 451 units and 240 anticipated ADUs, the total need with a 10% buffer is 1, 944 units; and WHEREAS, the 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element identifies strategies and programs to conserve and improve existing affordable housing; provide adequate housing sites; assist in the development of affordable housing; remove governmental and other constraints to housing development; and promote equal housing opportunities in a strategic manner; and
WHEREAS, the 6th Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element actualizes the noted strategies and programs with proposed additional residential densities within mixed- use designations, residential recycling, residential overlays in commercial and industrial zones, and residential development on religious properties through coordination with nonprofit organizations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its duly noticed public meetings on April 20, May 4, May 11, and May 18, 2021, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, considered multiple land plans for the purpose of identifying housing sites throughout the City that would accommodate the City' s RHNA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at its duly noticed public meeting on June 15, 2021 approved a draft land use plan that identified housing sites that can accommodate the City' s RHNA and other land use changes and adjustments to some commercial, industrial, and public institutional designations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on July 5th, 2022, at which time it considered evidence presented by staff, the consultant, and other interested parties and adopted the revised City of Redondo Beach 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element, incorporating the amendments recommended by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and submitted the revised Housing Element to HCD on July 11, 2022; and
179
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2022, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued a letter certifying the City’s 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element and noting that the City must continue timely and effective implementation of all programs; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone is consistent with, supports, and serves to implements the Land Use Element and Programs 8, 9, 10, and 13 of the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element; and WHEREAS, program 8 does not identify any properties requiring rezoning in the coastal zone, but it commits to allowing housing by-right on properties identified in the Housing Element sites inventory, where no rezoning was required, if the property meets certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, program 9 ensures nondiscretionary processing for nonvacant sites that were identified in the City’s previous housing element; and WHEREAS, program 10 requires replacement housing consistent with state law; and
WHEREAS, program 13 commits to update the zoning ordinance to comply with multiple state laws and implement the City’s General Plan; and WHEREAS, the associated updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinances and Local Coastal Program (LCP) required for consistency with the General Plan are also consistent with, support, and serve to implement the City’s Housing Element inclusive of the “Housing Sites” and “Housing Programs”, and also serve to update the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP consistent with State Housing Laws; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 the City’s Updated Draft General Plan, Draft Zoning Ordinance, and Draft Local Coastal Program, were released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the draft documents; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, August 1, and August 15, 2024 the Planning Commission held multiple duly noticed public hearings to take testimony from staff, the public and other interested parties, and to deliberate on updates to the City’s General Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Element, and revisions to the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP required for consistency and to implement the City’s Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2024 the Planning Commission held a final duly noticed public hearing and completed its deliberations on updates to the City’s General Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Elements, and updates to the City’s Zoning Ordinances and LCP required for consistency and to implement the City’s Housing Element, and took testimony from staff, the public and other interested
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 3
180
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 4
parties, and considered the associated program Draft Environmental Impact Report and made the following recommendations:

1. That the City Council certify pursuant to CEQA the Final Program Environmental Impact Report inclusive of its referenced appendices for the “Redondo Beach Focused General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Updates and Local Program Amendments”, approve appropriate findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and

4. That the City Council adopt amendments to the City of Redondo Beach’s Coastal Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program to make consistent the General Plan Update and to implement the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element inclusive of the zoning amendments for implementing “Housing Sites” and “Housing Programs”;
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Draft PEIR) has been prepared and was presented to the Planning Commission at the same time as the final draft of the General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone Amendments, and Local Coastal Program Amendments; and
WHEREAS, the overall purpose of the PEIR is to inform the City, responsible agencies, decision makers, and the public about the potential environmental effects resulting from full implementation of the proposed Redondo Beach General Plan Update, and the associated Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone, and Local Coastal Program amendments that are required for consistency purposes and to implement the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the PEIR addresses effects that may be significant and adverse; evaluates alternatives to the project; and identifies mitigation measures and alternatives to reduce or avoid identified potentially significant impacts; and WHEREAS, included as an appendix to the PEIR, Appendix A Buildout Methodology, explains the buildout assumptions and methodologies utilized for projecting 181
the potential growth in the City over the next 25 years to the horizon year of the General Plan Update of 2050; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 an “Amended Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Report” was issued to advise the public and interested parties that the City of Redondo Beach Planning Division had released the Draft PEIR addressing potential impacts associated with the Redondo Beach Focused General Plan Update, Zoning Ordinance Update and Local Coastal Program Amendment (proposed project) for a 47-day review period beginning on August 1, 2024, and ending on September 16, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2024 the City’s Updated Draft General Plan, Draft Zoning Ordinance, and Draft LCP, were released for comment on the City’s website, allowing the public and other interested parties to comment directly on the Draft General Plan Document; and
WHEREAS, the City timely received 18 written comments on the Draft PEIR; and WHEREAS, all comments timely received on the Draft PEIR have been responded to and are included in the Final PEIR, which consists of the Draft EIR, responses to comments timely received on the Draft PEIR, and clarifications/revisions to the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 15, and 29, 2024, and November 5, 2024, the City Council, at duly noticed public hearings, considered the Project and the Draft and Final PEIR, at which times the City staff presented its reports and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Final PEIR; and
WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2024, City Council directed staff to move forward with the Housing Element implementation related General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Local Coastal Program Amendments to comply with the statutory deadline of February 12, 2025 and defer other proposed nonresidential amendments for later consideration. Additionally, City Council directed City staff to include other residential amendments not required by the City’s Housing Element that change residential capacity at the same time as the Housing Element related amendments; and
WHEREAS, multiple technical studies, environmental scoping meetings, community surveys, public meetings and workshops with the GPAC, the general public, the Planning Commission, and the City Council since 2016 have all served to engage and inform the general public including residents, business owners/operators, and other interested parties and have shaped the resulting draft General Plan Update, and the associated Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Zone, and LCP amendments required for consistency and implementing the Housing Element.

ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 5
182
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 6

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance are consistent with the “Purpose” and procedures pursuant to Redondo Beach Municipal Code Section 10-5.2504 Zoning amendments.

2. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance are consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element.

3. That the amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance are consistent with and serve to implement the City’s certified 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element.

4. The amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance are necessary to facilitate the development of affordable housing in the community consistent with State housing law.

5. The City Council considered the information contained in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance amendments, and the City Council certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2023050732), adopted findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals and findings are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.

SECTION 3. FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. That the City Council considered the information contained in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the proposed amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance, and the City Council certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2023050732), adopted findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and directed City staff to implement and monitor the mitigation measures, and file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21152. 183
SECTION 4. TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE. That the City Council adopt amendments to the Redondo Beach Municipal Code, Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance to make consistent and implement the City’s certified 6 th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element as well as other amendments regarding residentially designated properties, which amendments are not identified as program actions in the City’s Housing Element, in accordance with the proposed changes/ edits attached as “Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B” (Zoning Map, November 12, 2024).

SECTION 5. SEVERANCE. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this amendment to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of these amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this amendment to Title 10 Planning and Zoning, Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 7
184
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 8
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2024. _______________________________
James A. Light, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ________________________________ Michael W. Webb, City Attorney Eleanor Manzano, CMC, City Clerk 185
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
REDONDO BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 5 AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE NO. 9

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH )
I, Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk of the City of Redondo Beach, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 3283-24 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5
th day of November, 2024 and approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Redondo Beach, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 12th day of November, 2024, and there after signed and approved by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, and that said ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________
Eleanor Manzano, CMC
City Clerk
186
Exhibit A Page | C-1
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
“Exhibit A”
Proposed Amendments to Title 10 Planning and Zoning,
Chapter 5 Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing
Ordinance of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code.

Amendments to Chapter 5, Coastal Land Use Plan Implementing Ordinance
Amendments to Article 1, General Provisions
Section 10-5.300, Designation of Zones:

The following text will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (c) will be amended to read:
(c) Mixed Use.
(1) .
(2) MU-3 Mixed Use Zones: MU-3, MU-3B and MU-3C.

Section 10-5.402, Definitions:

The following definitions will be added to or revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) within Section 10-5.402, Definitions:
…
“Employee housing” shall mean qualified employee housing providing accommodation for six or fewer employees, pursuant to the Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5(b). …
“Family” shall mean an individual or two or more persons, related by blood, marriage, or adoption, or a group of not more than five persons, excluding servants, who need not blood, marriage, or adoption, living together in a living together in a dwelling unit, with common access to and common use of all living, kitchen, and eating areas within a dwelling unit., but not including limited residential care facilities. …
"Floor area, gross." In calculating gross floor area, all horizontal dimensions shall be taken from the exterior faces of walls, including covered enclosed porches, but not including the area of inner courts or shaft enclosures.
(a) Uses in nonresidential zones. Gross floor area shall mean the floor area of the ground floor and any additional stories, and the floor area of mezzanines, lofts, and basements of a structure. Gross floor area shall not include any area used exclusively for vehicle parking and loading, enclosed vertical shafts, or elevators.
(b) Residential uses in "R" residential zones. Gross floor area shall mean the floor area of the ground floor and any additional stories of all buildings on the lot including accessory buildings. The gross floor area shall include mezzanines and lofts, and garages. Gross floor area shall not include decks, 187
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-2
balconies, attics, basements where the finished first floor above the basement (or the roof of the basement where there is no first floor above) is no more than two feet above the existing grade or finished grade, whichever is lower, within the front 40 feet of the lot, or basements not located within the front 40 feet of the lot.
(c) Mixed uses in mixed use zones. Gross floor area shall mean the floor area of the ground floor and any additional stories of all buildings on the lot including accessory buildings. The gross floor area shall include mezzanines, and lofts. Gross floor area shall not include decks, balconies, attics, basements where the finished first floor above the basement (or the roof of the basement where there is no first floor above) is no more than two feet above the existing grade or finished grade, whichever is lower, within the front 40 feet of the lot, or basements not located within the front 40 feet of the lot. Gross floor area shall not include any area used exclusively for vehicle parking and loading, enclosed vertical shafts, or elevators.
…
“Household” shall mean a family living together in a single dwelling unit, with a common access to, and common use of, all living and eating areas and all areas and facilities for the preparation and storage of food within the dwelling unit all the people who occupy a housing unit. A household includes all related and unrelated people, who share the dwelling unit. A person living alone in a dwelling unit, or a group of unrelated people sharing a dwelling unit are also counted as a household. …
“Household, lower income” shall mean a household making up to 80 percent of the area median income (AMI) as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). …
“Low barrier navigation center” shall mean a housing first, low barrier, temporary, service-enriched shelter focused on helping homeless individuals and families to quickly obtain permanent housing. Low barrier includes best practices to reduce barriers to entry, such as allowing partners, pets, storage of personal items, and privacy.
…
“Mixed Use, Horizontal” shall mean a project that combines different types of uses within multiple singleuse buildings that offer complementary functions as a horizontal mixed use (HMU) project. A HMU project may include apartment buildings, businesses and retail stores all located within the same development site and operating as a cohesive district.
…
“Mixed Use, Vertical” shall mean a project that combines different types of uses within the same building as a vertical mixed use (VMU) project. A VMU project might include a building with commercial uses on the ground floor and residential or office uses on higher floors. …
"Residential care facility, limited" shall mean 24-hour non-medical care for six or fewer persons in need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-3
1940) of Title 5 of part 4 of division 3 of the Civil Code. The term also includes a unit in an “SRO Project” as described in Title 4 California Code of Regulations Section 10325(g)(3)(H). …
“Supportive housing” shall mean housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community (as defined by Government Code Section 65582). …
“Target population” shall mean persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health condition, or individuals eligible for service provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 4500) of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, and homeless people. …
“Transitional housing” shall mean a building or buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six (6) months from the beginning of the assistance (as defined by Section 50675.2 of the Health and Safety Code).
…
Amendments to Article 2, Zoning Districts
Section 10-5.500 Specific Purposes, R-1 and R-1A single-family residential zones Section 10-5.500 Specific Purposes, R-1 and R-1A single-family residential zones shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Provide residential areas to be developed exclusively for single-family dwellings, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing, subject to appropriate site and design standards, consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan and with the standards of public health, safety, and welfare established by the Municipal Code;
Section 10-5.501 Land use regulations: R-1 and R-1A single-family residential zones.

The following uses will be added (shown as underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications R-1 R-1A Additional Regulations See Sections:

Residential Uses
Supportive housing P P 10-5.1638
Transitional housing P P
Employee housing P P
189
Exhibit A Page | C-4
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-5.510 Specific Purposes, R-2, R-3A, RMD, and RH multiple-family residential zones.

Section 10-5.510 Specific Purposes, R-2, R-3A, RMD, and RH multiple-family residential zones shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Provide appropriately located areas for multiple-family residential development, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan, and with the standards of public health, safety, and welfare established by the Municipal Code; Section 10-5.511, Land use regulations: R-2, R-3, RMD, and RH multiple-family residential zones.

The following uses and note will be revised and added (shown as strike through and underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications R-2 R-3 R-3A RMD RH-1 RH-2 RH-3
Additional Regulations
See Section:

Residential Uses
2-315 residential units on a lot* P P P P P P P 10-5.1608 416 or more residential units on a
lot* C C C C C C C 10-5.1608
Supportive housing P P P P P P P 10-5.1638
Transitional housing P P P P P P P
Employee housing P P P P P P P
*Maximum number of units per each Zone is established by the applicable Zone’s development standards.

Section 10-5.513 Development standards: R-2 low density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-5.513 Development standards: R-2 low density multiple-family residential zone shall revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined only when all of the requirements of subsections (b)(1) and), (b)(2) of this section are satisfied. (This subsection is not intended to permit the combination of two or more typical or standard-sized lots or to permit developments of a mass and scale inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood.)
(1) One of the following conditions exists:
a. One or more of the lots is less than 5,000 square feet in area, or b.One or more of the lots has no legal access from a public street or alley, or c. One or more of the lots is subject to other unique circumstances such as unusual lot size, shape or topography, and the combining of the lots will help achieve an improved development more consistent with the character of development in the neighborhood; (1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code, the Subdivision Map Act and Article 10 of this chapter; (2) The proposed combination is brought in connection with an applications for Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.
190
Exhibit A Page | C-5
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-5.515 Development standards: R-3a low density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-5.515 Development standards: R-3a low density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined only when the following are satisfied. (1) The front lot line of the combined lots shall not exceed 100 feet, (1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act and Article 10 of this chapter; (2) The proposed combination is brought in connection with an applications for Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.

Section 10-5.516 Development standards: RMD medium density multiple-family residential zone Section 10-5.516 Development standards: RMD medium density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read::
(b) Permitted lot combinations. Two or more lots may be combined provided that the following requirements are satisfied:
(1) A parcel map is approved pursuant to the standards and requirements set forth in Chapter 1, Title 10 of the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act and Article 10 of this Chapter; (2) The proposed combination is brought in connection with application an applications for Administrative Design Review for projects processing 15 units or fewer, or Planning Commission Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit for a development greater than 15 units consistent with the development standards applicable to the zone.

Section 10-5.517 Development standards: RH-1 high density multiple-family residential zone.

Section 10-5.517 Development standards: RH-1 high density multiple-family residential zone shall be amended as follows:
(a) Lot area per dwelling unit. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,556 1,452 square feet of lot area, not to exceed 28 30 dwelling units per net acre except one unit may be constructed on any legal lot as defined in Section 10-5.402 and Section 10-5.1528 of this chapter.

Section 10-5.518 Development standards: RH-2 high density multiple-family residential zone.

Section 10-5.518 Development standards: RH-2 high density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Lot area per dwelling unit. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,556 1,452 square feet of lot area, not to exceed 28 30 dwelling units per net acre except one unit may be constructed on any legal lot as defined in Section 10-5.402 and Section 10-5.1528 of this chapter.
191
Exhibit A Page | C-6
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-5.519 Development standards: RH-3 high density multiple-family residential zone.

Section 10-5.519 Development standards: RH-3 high density multiple-family residential zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Lot area per dwelling unit.
(1) The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,556 1,452 square feet of lot area, not to exceed 28 30 dwelling units per net acre except one unit may be constructed on any legal lot as defined in Section 10-5.402 and Section 10-5.1528 of this chapter.

Section 10-5.900 Specific Purposes, MU-21, and MU-3 mixed-use zones.

Section 10-5.900 Specific Purposes, MU-2, and MU-3 mixed-use zones shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

In addition to the general purposes listed in Section 10-5.102, the specific purposes of the MU-2 and MU-3 mixed use zones are to:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Encourage residential uses, including those units used as transitional housing, supportive housing or employee housing, in conjunction with commercial activities in order to create an active street life, enhance the vitality of businesses, and reduce vehicular traffic; Section 10-5.910, Land use regulations: MU-2, MU-3, MU-3B, and MU-3C mixed-use zones.

The following uses will be added (shown as underlined text) to the table as noted below:

Classifications MU-2 MU-3
MU-3B
MU-3C
Additional Regulations
See Section:

Residential Uses
Supportive housing P P P 10-5.1638
Transitional housing P P P
Employee housing P P P
Other Uses
Low barrier navigation centers P P P 10-5.1636
Section 10-5.914 Development standards: MU-2 mixed-use zone.

Section 10-5.914 Development standards: MU-2 mixed-use zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential density. The maximum number of dwelling units on a lot shall be no more than one unit for each 1,245 1,452 square feet of lot area.

Section 10-5.917 Development standards: MU-3B mixed-use zone.

Section 10-5.918 Development standards: MU-3B mixed-use zone no longer applies to any properties in the Coastal zone, and shall be removed.
192
Exhibit A Page | C-7
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-5.918 Development standards: MU-3C mixed-use zone.

Section 10-5.918 Development standards: MU-3C mixed-use zone shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (b) will be amended to read:
(b) Residential Density. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on a lot shall be not more than one dwelling unit for each 1,245 1,452 square feet of lot area, not to exceed 35 30 dwelling units per net acre except one unit may be constructed on any legal lot as defined in Section 10-5.402 and Section 10-5.1528 of this chapter.

Amendments to Article 4, Special Use Regulations
Section 10-5.1608 Condominiums
Section 10-5.1608, Condominiums shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) to allow projects with up to 15 units be permitted administratively:

Subsection (c) will be amended to read:
(c) Conditional use permits and design review required. (1) No condominium containing four sixteen or more units shall be established unless a Conditional Use Permit is obtained pursuant to Section 10-5.2506 of this chapter. (2) Condominiums containing four sixteen or more units shall be subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-5.2502.
(3) Condominiums containing two to three fifteen units shall be subject to Administrative Design Review pursuant to Section 10-5.2500.

Section 10-5.1636 Low Barrier Navigation Centers.

Section 10-5.1636 Low Barrier Navigation Centers shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 4, Special Use Regulations:

Section 10-5.1636 Low Barrier Navigation Centers.
(a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this Section is to establish development standards for low barrier navigation centers and to ensure this use is constructed and operated in a manner that is consistent with the requirements and allowances of State law, specifically Article 12 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Planning and Zoning Law commencing with California Government Code Section 65660. (a) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to all low-barrier navigation center projects. Lowbarrier navigation centers are allowed by-right (not subject to a discretionary permit or approval) in areas zoned for mixed-use and nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses. Low barrier navigation centers must meet the following requirements:
(1) Connected Services. It offers services to connect people to permanent housing through a services plan that identifies services staffing.
(2) Coordinated Entry System. It is linked to a coordinated entry system, so that staff in the interim facility or staff who co-locate in the facility may conduct assessments and provide services to connect people to permanent housing. “Coordinated entry system” means a centralized or coordinated assessment system developed pursuant to Section 576.400(d) or Section 578.7(a)(8), as applicable, of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those sections read on January 1, 193
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-8
2020, and any related requirements, designed to coordinate program participant intake, assessment, and referrals.
(3) Code Compliant. It complies with Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 8255) of Division 8 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(4) Homeless Management Information System. It has a system for entering information regarding client stays, client demographics, client income, and exit destination through the local Homeless Management Information System, as defined by Section 578.3 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Section 10-5.1638 Supportive Housing.

Section 10-5.1638 Supportive Housing shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 4, Special Use Regulations:

Section 10-5.1638 Supportive Housing.
(a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to ensure that housing development projects that meet the definition of supportive housing as defined in California Government Code Section 65650 et seq. are reviewed and processed ministerially pursuant to California Government Code Section 65583(c)(3). (b) Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all supportive housing projects meeting the requirements of California Government Code Section 65650 et seq. (c) Projects allowed by-right. Supportive housing shall be a use by right, subject to administrative design review, in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses, if the proposed development satisfies all of the following requirements:
(1) The development is within a mixed-use zone or multi-family residential zone. (2) Units within the development are subject to a recorded affordability restriction for 55 years. (3) One hundred percent of the units, excluding the manager unit(s), within the development are dedicated to lower income households and are receiving public funding to ensure affordability of the housing to lower income Californians.
(4) At least 25 percent of the units in the development or 12 units, whichever is greater, are restricted to residents in supportive housing who meet criteria of the target population. If the development consists of fewer than 12 units, then 100 percent of the units, excluding manager unit(s), in the development shall be restricted to residents in supportive housing. (5) Non-residential floor area shall be used for on-site supportive services in the following amounts:

A. For a development with 20 or fewer total units, at least 90 square feet shall be provided for onsite supportive services.

B. For a development with more than 20 units, at least 3 percent of the total nonresidential floor area shall be provided for onsite supportive services that are limited to tenant use, including, but not limited to, community rooms, case management offices, computer rooms, and community kitchens. (6) The developer replaces any dwelling units on the site of the supportive housing development in the manner provided in State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Section 65915(c)(3)(C)).
(7) Units within the development, excluding manager unit(s), include at least one bathroom and a kitchen or other cooking facilities, including, at minimum, a stovetop, a sink, and a refrigerator. 194
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-9
(d) Development and Operational Standards. Supportive housing projects shall comply with all the following standards
(1) The project shall comply with applicable Objective Residential Standards, and development standards or policies also required of multifamily developments in the same zone. Supportive housing projects in nonresidential zones where housing is permitted by State law, shall comply with the development standards applicable to the multifamily zone consistent with the density for the project.
(2) The applicant shall submit a plan for providing supportive services, to include all the following items:
a. Documentation that supportive services will be provided on-site. b. The name of the proposed entities that will provide supportive services. c. The proposed funding sources for the services provided. d. Proposed staffing levels.
(3) No minimum parking requirements shall be required for the units occupied by supportive housing residents for projects located within one-half mile of a public transit stop.

Amendments to Article 5, Parking Regulations
Section 10-5.1704 Residential parking standards
Section 10-5.1704 Residential parking standards will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Section 10-5.1706 Commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential parking standards Section 10-5.1706 Commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential parking standards will be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Use Spaces Required
Emergency shelters: One space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. One parking space per employee on site at the same time.

SRO facility: One parking space per unit plus an additional space for the on-site manager.

Amendments to Article 9, Density Bonuses
Existing language in Article 9, (Sections 10-5.2100 – 10-5.2112), Density Bonuses will be repealed and replaced (replacement language is shown as underlined text) with the following:
195
Exhibit A Page | C-10
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-5.2100 Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to encourage the development of affordable housing in accordance with State law.

This “Article” establishes the procedural process to implement State Density Bonus Law.

Section 10-5.2101 State law incorporated.

Section 10-5.2102 Definitions.

State law definitions, as they may be amended from time to time, control over the definitions in this section. (a) “Affordable Housing Benefits” means one or more the of the following, as defined in Government Code Section 65915:
(1) A density bonus;
(2) An incentive or concession;
(3) A development standard waiver or modification; and
(4) A parking standard modification.
(b) “Applicant” means the applicant or permittee of a Qualified Housing Development and its assignees or successors in interest.
(c) “Director” means the City’s Community Development Director or designee. (d) “Qualified Housing Development” means a housing development that meets the threshold eligibility for Affordable Housing Benefits, as identified in Government Code Section 65915.

Section 10-5.2103 Target Rents and Mortgage Payments.

Target rents and Mortgage payments shall be as provided in Government Code Section 65915.

Section 10-5.2104 Affordability Requirements and Construction of Affordable Units. (a) The affordability requirements shall be as provided in Government Code Section 65915. (b) The affordable units that qualify the project as a Qualified Housing Development must be constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of any market rate units.

Section 10-5.2104 Application Required.

An applicant seeking any Affordable Housing Benefits under this Article must comply with all of the following:
(a) The applicant shall file an application for a Density Bonus Permit on a form approved by the Director concurrently with the applications for any other land use permits or approvals that may be required for the project.
(b) The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City pursuant to Section 10-5.2108, to maintain and enforce the affordable housing component of the housing development. 196
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-11
(c) Contents of Application. The application for a Density Bonus Permit shall include the following information:
(1) A description of the project, including the gross acreage of the parcel(s), the total number of proposed dwelling units, the number of affordable units and level of affordability for each affordable unit proposed to be included in the project, and the location, design, and phasing of all units;
(2) A breakdown of the current and proposed general plan and zoning designations, and the maximum allowable residential density (as defined in State law); (3) In applications involving the donation of land and/or childcare facilities, the location of such land and/or facilities and a detailed description of compliance with the conditions and definitions in State law;
(4) A calculation of the density bonus allowed pursuant to State law, including the percentage of density bonus, percentage of income-restricted units, and number of density bonus units being proposed over and above the maximum allowable residential density; (5) A description of the incentives or concessions requested (if any), including a detailed explanation as to how the request will enable the applicant to provide housing at the target rents or mortgage payments;
(6) A description of the waivers or reductions of development standards requested (if any), including identification of each specific development standard from which the applicant seeks to deviate and a detailed explanation as to how the application of the development standard would physically preclude the development of a development meeting the eligibility criteria at the densities or with the concessions or incentives permitted by State law; (7) The proposed method of ensuring the continued affordability of all income-restricted units, for the applicable time period(s) in State law;
(8) Other relevant information as required by State law; and (9) Other information identified on the City’s application form that may be required to ensure compliance with State law.
(d) An application for a Density Bonus permit will not be processed until it complies with all of the provisions of this Section as determined by the Director and shall be processed concurrently with other required entitlements for the project. Prior to the submittal of an application for a Qualified Housing Development, an applicant may submit to the Director a preliminary proposal for Affordable Housing Benefits. (e) Approval of a Density Bonus permit shall be at the same level as the planning entitlement action for the project with the highest requirement.

Section 10-5.2105 Review of Requested Affordable Housing Benefits (a) The City shall grant a density bonus to a Qualified Housing Development in the amount specified by Government Code Section 65915 provided the resulting project is consistent with the provisions of the California Coastal Act and the Coastal Land Use Plan.
(b) If requested, the City shall grant a parking ratio reduction to a Qualified Housing Development in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 65915 provided the resulting project is consistent with the provisions of the California Coastal Act and the Coastal Land Use Plan, including all requirement to ensure coastal access.
197
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-12
(c) The City shall grant the specific concession(s) or incentive(s) requested by the Applicant, unless it makes any of the relevant written findings stated in Government Code Section 65915(d). Senior citizen housing developments that qualify for a density bonus shall not receive any incentives or concessions beyond of those allowed under Section VI, Subsection D, Policy 14 of the Coastal Land Use Plan, unless Government Code Section 65915 is amended, to specifically require that local agencies grant incentives or concessions for senior citizen housing developments.
(d) The City shall grant a requested waiver or reduction of a development standard, unless it finds that:
(1) The application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant; (2) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;
(3) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or (4) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or federal law. (5) The waiver or reduction is inconsistent with the California Coastal Act. (e) The granting of any Affordable Housing Benefit shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a Coastal Land Use Plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary approval; (f) This Section does not limit or require the provision of direct financial incentives for the housing development, including the provision of publicly owned land, by the City or the waiver of fees or dedication requirement, except as otherwise provided by State law.

Section 10-5.2106 Appeals
(a) If the decision to approve or deny an application for an Affordable Housing Benefit is made by the Director or Planning Commission, any person may appeal the decision. The appeal shall be in writing, state the grounds for appeal, and shall be filed with the City Clerk including the applicable fee, within 15 calendar days of the date of the mailing of the Director’s decision or Commission hearing date. The decision of the City Council shall be final.
(b) If the decision to approve or deny an application for an Affordable Housing Benefit is made by the Director or his/her assigned, then an appeal may be filed with the Planning Commission. If the decision is made by Planning Commission, then an appeal may be filed to the City Council. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section10-5.2108, if the determination of the underlying application for the Qualified Housing Development is also appealed along with the decision of the Affordable Housing Benefit, then the entire project shall be controlled by the appeal procedures applicable to the underlying application.

Section 10-5.2108, Affordable Housing Agreement and Equity Sharing Agreement A building permit for a Qualified Housing Development shall only be issued if and when the Applicant, or its designee, enters into an affordable housing agreement and, if applicable, an equity sharing agreement, with the City or its designee pursuant to, in compliance with, and to implement this Section and State law. The agreements shall be in the form approved by the City which shall contain terms and conditions mandated by, or necessary to implement, State law and this Article. The Director may designate a qualified administrator or entity to administer 198
Exhibit A Page | C-13
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
the provisions of this section on behalf of the City. The affordable housing agreement shall be recorded prior to, or concurrently with, final map recordation or, where the Qualified Housing Development does not include a map, prior to issuance of a building permit for any structure on the site. The Director is hereby authorized to enter into the agreements authorized by this section on behalf of the City upon approval of the agreements by City Attorney for legal form and sufficiency.

Amendments to Article 12, Procedures
Section 10-5.2500 Administrative Design Review.

Section 10-5.2500 Administrative Design Review shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

Subsection (a) will be amended to read:
(a) Purpose. The purpose of Administrative Design Review is to enable the Community Development Director or his/her assigned to review minor development projects that otherwise meet the zoning regulations, in terms of the appropriateness of the design. The Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall review:
(1) All new single-family residences;
(2) All additions to existing single-family residences where the combined addition is greater than 500 square feet of gross floor area to the dwelling and/or any accessory building; (3) All additions to existing single-family residences that entail expansion of floor area above the first story;
(4) All additions of less than 1,000 gross square feet to multiple-family residential developments containing four or more units;
(5) All floor area additions to residential developments containing two to three units; (6) All new residential developments containing two to three fifteen units on any lot, subject to a notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section. Any two to three fifteen unit development involving more than two adjacent lots shall be subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-5.2502;
(7) The addition of an accessory dwelling unit or the addition of two units on a lot that already contains an existing single-family residence (see definition of accessory dwelling unit in Section 10-5.402);
(8) The addition of a third (3rd) unit on a lot that already contains two units; (9) All housing development projects in which at least 20 percent of the units are dedicated for lower income households and are located on properties identified in appendix B of the 2021- 2029 Housing Element meeting the requirements of either (a) or (b) below, which shall be allowed by-right and approved if all objective standards are met, consistent with State law. a. Housing Element - Reused Sites. The proposed project site is i) listed on Table B-1 in the 2021-2029 Housing Element, ii) identified as a site used in a prior housing element, iii) not listed as vacant, and iv) satisfies any portion of the City’s lower income RHNA requirement.
b. Housing Element - Rezoned Sites. The proposed project site is i) listed on Table B-2 in the 2021-2029 Housing Element and identified in Table B-2 as satisfying any portion of the City’s low- or very low-income RHNA requirement.
199
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-14
(10) All other development not subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-5.2502.

Subsection (b), paragraph (7) will be amended to read:
(7) The project shall comply with the Objective Residential Standards adopted by resolution of the City Council. If there is a conflict between “Criteria” (1) through (6) with the Objective Residential Standards, the Objective Residential Standards shall prevail.

Subsection (e) will be amended to read:
(e) Notice of pending decision. Notice of a pending decision by the Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall be given as follows for all non-residential development under subsection (a)(9) and for new multiple-family developments. For purposes of this section, new multiple-family developments shall mean development of two or three dwelling units on a vacant lot or in conjunction with demolition of 50% or more of the total floor area of existing development on the lot. New development shall not include an "accessory dwelling unit" as defined in Section 10-5.402. (1) By mailing a written notice thereof, not less than 10 working days prior to the date of pending approval to the applicant, to the owner of the subject property and to the owners of properties within 300 feet of the exterior boundary of the subject property or properties; such notices shall be sent by first class mail, with postage prepaid, using the addresses from the last adopted tax roll, if available;
(2) By posting such notice in at least one prominent place on or about each parcel which is the subject of the proposed action, or upon utility poles or sticks along or about the street line of such parcel; and
(3) The content of the notice of pending decision for an Administrative Design Review shall contain the following information:
a. The date of filing of the application and the name of the applicant, b. The file number assigned to the application,
c. A description of the proposed development and its location, d. The date at which the application is expected to be approved, and e. A statement that revisions to the proposed project will be considered by the Community Development Director or his/her assigned upon the written request of any person provided that such written request is received by the Community Development Director or his/her assigned within 10 working days from the date of sending the notice.

Subsection (f) will be amended to read:
(f) Decision on application. The Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall review the application and shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Projects meeting the requirements of Section 10-5.2500 (a)(9) shall be approved if found in compliance with the applicable objective standards per Criteria (7).
(1) If the decision of the Community Development Director or his/her assigned is to approve the application, an approval stamp shall be affixed to the plans. (2) It the approval requires conditions, the conditions will be made part of the approved plans. 200
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-15
(3) If the project requires a notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, no decision will be made until completion of the deadline for written requests for revisions. If no written request for revisions is received, the Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall make a decision pursuant to this subsection. If a written request for revisions has been received prior to the deadline, notice of the decision shall be mailed by first class mail within seven days of the decision to the applicant and the person that provided the written request for revisions to the proposed project.
(4) If the decision of the Community Development Director or his/her assigned is to deny the application, the decision shall be in writing and shall recite the failure to meet the criteria upon which the decision is based. Where the decision is to deny the application, notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant by first class mail within seven days of the decision.

Subsection (i) will be amended as follows – there are no changes to paragraphs (1) through (3):
(i) Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission. Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider an appeal of the decision of the Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall be given as follows.

Subsection (m) will be amended as follows:
(m) Expiration. An approval subject to Administrative Design Review shall become null and void unless vested within 36 months after the date of the approval. Such time limits may be extended by the Community Development Director or his/her assigned upon the written request of the applicant and the presentation of proof of an unusual hardship not of the applicant's own making. If an established time limit for development expires, and no extension has been granted, the approval, and all rights and privileges established therein, shall be considered null and void.

Subsection (n) will be amended as follows – there are no changes to paragraphs (1) through (7):
(n) Revocation. After notice to the applicant and subject to appeal to the Planning Commission, the Community Development Director or his/her assigned may revoke or modify any Administrative Design Review approval issued on one or more of the following grounds:

Section 10-5.2502 Planning Commission Design Review.

Section 10-5.2502 Planning Commission Design Review shall be revised (shown as strike through and underlined text) as follows:

5.2500(a).

Section 10-5.2522 Reasonable Accommodation.

Section 10-5.2522 Reasonable Accommodation shall be added (shown as underlined text) to Article 12, Procedures:

Section 10-5.2522 Reasonable Accommodation.
(a) Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose of this chapter, in compliance with the fair housing laws, to provide a procedure to evaluate requests for reasonable accommodation related to specific applications of the zoning law in order to ensure that no person is discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, national origin, source of income, or ancestry, as required by federal and/or State law, by being denied an equal opportunity to use and enjoy their dwelling 201
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-16
and to authorize the application of exceptions to the city's zoning law and land development standards, if warranted.
(b) Application
(1) Any person, business, or organization may submit an application for reasonable accommodation to the city's residential development standards by submitting an application to the city's Community Development Director, or his or her designee, on a form provided by the city. (2) The following information shall be provided in the application:
a. The applicant's name, mailing address and daytime phone number(s) (and/or representatives) if so applicable;
b. Notarized written consent of the owner of the subject property if the applicant is not the owner;
c. The address of the property for which the request is being made; d. The specific zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy of the city from which relief is sought;
e. An explanation of why the specified zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy is preventing, or will prevent, the applicant's use and enjoyment of the subject property; f. The nature of the accommodation requested;
g. A site plan or illustrative drawing showing the proposed accommodation; and h. The basis for the claim that the fair housing laws consider the applicant as protected (applicant should submit a letter from a medical doctor, handicap license, or other similar supportive evidence).
(c) Filing and Appeal Fees
(1) A filing fee or an appeal fee, as applicable and in the amounts established by city council resolution, shall be paid at the time of the filing of an application or at the time of filing an appeal pursuant to this chapter.
(2) If an applicant requires assistance in completing the application, the city shall provide reasonable assistance to ensure that the application process is accessible to the applicant. (d) Determination of application
(1) The request for reasonable accommodation shall be considered by the Community Development Director, who may deny, approve or conditionally approve the request. (e) Findings
(1) The following findings shall be made, and the Community Development Director shall approve an application upon a showing of all of the following:
a. The person who will use the subject property is protected under the fair housing laws; b. The requested exception to the zoning code, law, regulation, procedure or policy is necessary to make specific housing available to persons occupying the subject property; c. The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the city; and
202
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Exhibit A Page | C-17
d. The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration of the city's zoning or building laws, policies and/or procedures.
(f) Notice of decision
(1) Within thirty (30) days after acceptance of a complete application for reasonable accommodation the Community Development Director, shall provide the applicant with written notification of the decision regarding the request, including any reasonable conditions. (g) Appeal
(1) Appeal of decision of the Community Development Director. Within ten (10) days of the date of any decision made pursuant to this section, any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the Community Development Director in granting or denying a request for reasonable accommodation may appeal the decision to the Planning Commission.
(2) Appeal of decision of the Planning Commission. Within ten (10) days of the date of any decision made pursuant to this section, any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the Planning Commission in granting or denying a request for reasonable accommodation may appeal the decision to the City Council and no further.

Article 13, Housing Replacement Obligations and Occupant Protections Required for New Development Projects
Section 10-5.2600 Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to require housing replacement consistent with State Housing Law including Government Code Sections 66300.5-66300.6 and 65583.2(g)(3). This “Article” implements the provisions of those statutes.

Section 10-5.2601 State law consistency
The provisions of this Article are intended to comply with Government Code Sections 66300.5 et. seq and 65583 et. seq and related State laws. In the event that any provision of this Article conflicts with Sections 66300.5- 66300.6 and 65583.2(g)(3) or any related State laws, the State law(s) shall apply.

Section 10-5.2602 Definitions
The definition of terms shall be as provided in Government Code Section 66300.5. In addition, the following definitions shall control over any conflicting definitions in other sections of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code. State law definitions, as they may be amended from time to time, control over the definitions in this section. (a) Complete application. refers to a complete application pursuant to Section 65943 of the California Government Code.
(b) Housing development project. shall have the same meaning as defined in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 65905.5 of the California Government Code,
(c) Protected units. has the same meaning as set forth in California Government Code Section 66300.5. 203
Exhibit A Page | C-18
ORDINANCE NO. CC-3283-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10 PLANNING AND ZONING, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENETS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit A
Section 10-5.2603 Applicability
(a) Unless otherwise required by Government Code Section 66300 et seq. or another provision of State law, this article shall apply only to housing development projects that submit a preliminary application prior to January 1, 2030, or a complete application prior to January 1, 2034. This article shall not apply to a housing development project that submitted a complete application to the City before January 1, 2020. (b) For any development project that does not fall within paragraph (a), and unless otherwise required by Government Code Section 66300 et seq. or another provision of State law, this article shall apply if the applicant submits a complete application for planning entitlements and/or a building permit (if no planning entitlements are required), along with any associated submittal fee, on or after January 1, 2024 but before January 1, 2030
Section 10-5.2604 Replacement Obligations and Occupant Protections Required for New Development Projects
(a) The City shall not approve any land use entitlement or issue a building permit for a housing development project that will require the demolition of one or more residential dwelling units unless the project will create at least as many residential dwelling units as will be demolished. (b) The City shall not approve any land use entitlement or issue a building permit for a development project that will require the demolition of occupied or vacant protected units, or where protected units were demolished after January 1, 2020, unless the housing development project meets all of the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66300.6 and 65583.2(g)(3). (c) Housing development projects must replace the units on site. Replacement units for non-residential projects may be located on a site other than the project site but shall be located within the same jurisdiction and the applicant may contract with another entity to develop the required replacement housing.

Section 10-5.2606 Sunset Provision
(a) This article shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2034, and as of that date is repealed. (b) A development project that submits a preliminary application pursuant to Section 65941.1 of the California Government Code before January 1, 2030, remains subject to this article after January 1, 2030. 204

HIGH LN

RIPLEY AVE

PALM LN

HARKNESS LN

WOLLACOTT ST

GRANT AVE FORD AVE RINDGE LN

ROBINSON ST

GOODMAN AVE

JOHNSTON AVE

PERKINS LN
S. PROSPECT AVE

FLAGLER LN

HERRIN ST

FISK LN

VAN HORNE LN

BLOSSOM LN

HUNTINGTON LN

AVENUE C
S. IREN
A
AVE
S. GUADALU
PE AVE

AVIATION BLVD

MACKAY LN

KNOB HILL AVE

EARLE ST
S. LUCIA AVE

BELMONT LN
S. FRA
N
CISC
A
AVE

ROCKEFELLER LN

VAIL AVE
160TH ST

DEL AMO ST

MEYER LN

FISHERMAN'S
WHARF

VINCENT ST

SLAUSON LN

MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD

AVENUE B
190TH ST
N. PACIFIC COAST HWY

PEARL ST

RALSTON LN
EL
REDON
D
O
N. HARBOR
DRIVE

EMERALD ST

AVENUE I

DOW AVE

ANITA ST

PULLMAN LN

DIAMOND ST

ARTESIA BLVD

LOMAX LN

AVENUE G
S. PACIFIC
COAST
H
W
Y

FELTON LN
CAMINO
REAL

INGLEWOOD AVE

AVIATION WAY

ORMOND LN

TOPAZ ST

ARMOUR LN
M
CBAIN
AVE

MARSHALLFIELD LN

DIXON ST
S. ELEN
A
AVE

BELAND BLVD

WYLIE LN

REYNOLDS LN

GREEN LN

FELTON AVE

FIRMONA AVE

PHELAN LN

RUBY ST

MAY AVE

PRUITT DR
N. PRO
S
PECT
AVE

TORRANCE BLVD

GRAHAM AVE

GATES AVE

CURTIS AVE

VOORHEES AVE

RUHLAND AVE

NELSON AVE

CARNEGIE LN

MATHEWS AVE

VANDERBILT LN

PALOS VERDES BLVD

BERYL ST

HARRIMAN LN

VI N C E
NT PK
S. JUANITA
AVE

ESPLANADE

AVIATION PL

SAPPHIRE
ST
182ND ST
LILIEN

THAL LN
N. CATALINA
AVE

CARNELIAN
ST
JULIA
AVE

SERPENTINE ST

IVES LN

HAYNES LN

GIBSON PL
KIN
GSD
ALE
AVE

SPEYER LN
N. BROADWAY
AVE

GARNET ST
CAMINO
DE
LA
COSTA

OPAL ST
Y
NEZ
AVE
S. CATALIN
A
AVE

AVENUE A

SPENCER ST
6TH ST
7TH PL
N. IRENA AVE

FAYE LN

SUSANA AVE

AVENUE E

AVENUE D

AVENUE F

AVENUE H

BLAISDELL AVE
N. LUCIA AVE
N. GERTRUDA
AVE

CLARK LN

PERRY AVE

CARVER ST

FARRELL AVE

ERNEST AVE

WARFIELD AVE

BATAAN RD

DUFOUR AVE

STANFORD AVE

PLANT AVE

HAWTHORNE BLVD

STEINHART AVE
183RD ST
182ND PL
S. GERTRU
D
A
AVE

SPRECKELS LN

ALVORD LN

SANTA FE AVE

REDONDO BEACH AVE
S. B
R
O
A
D
W
AY
AVE
185TH ST

SPACE PARK DR
184TH ST
JU
D
Y
DR
11TH ST

MARINE AVE

FABER ST

REED ST

TIMOTHY
AVE

HARPER AVE

RITA ST

BARKLEY LN

MORGAN LN

CARLSON LN

HAVEMEYER LN

CENTRAL
C
T
159TH ST
N. PAULINA AVE

MIRAMAR DR
10TH ST

HILL LN
N. MARIA AVE
N. ELENA AVE
N. JUANITA AVE

NEW HIGH CT

AMETHYST ST
N. GUADALUPE
AVE
E
LVIRA
AVE

AGATE ST
S
. S
U
NSET
CT

CLUSTER LN

SEAHAWK
WAY
S. MARIA
AVE

VILLAGE DR
VARGAS
WAY
A
M
Y LN

PACIFIC AVE
9TH ST
8TH ST

AXENTY WAY

BURRITT AVE
N. HELBE
RTA
AVE

SEBALD AVE
N. FRANCISCA
AVE
7TH ST

CONDON AVE
S. HELBERTA
AVE

HERONDO ST

HOPKINS WAY

PORTOFINO
WAY
GEO
R

GE FREETH WY

SIMON RAMOS DR

DOOLITTLE DR

PINCKARD AVE

CR (IF-AHO)

CR (IF)

P-PRO P-PRO P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO

P-PRO P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-PRO
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW

P-ROW P-ROW P-ROW P-ROW
P-ROW

P-ROW P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW
P-ROW

P-RVP(RIV)
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F
P-S F

RMD RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD

RMD RMD

RMD RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD
RMD

RMD RMD RMD

RMD(PLD)

PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY’S CERTIFIED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND OTHER AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTIES NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROGRAM ACTIONS IN THE CITY’S HOUSING ELEMENT.

Exhibit B
205
Administrative
Report
H.7., File # 24-1806 Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: GREG KAPOVICH, WATERFRONT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TITLE
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3284-24, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REDONDO BEACH ORDINANCE NO. 2922-03 TO INCREASE THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT LEVIED AGAINST BUSINESSES

WITHIN THE RIVIERA VILLAGE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, FOR SECOND READING

AND ADOPTION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Riviera Village Business Improvement District (RVBID) was established by the City Council in 2003. In accordance with State law pertaining to business improvement districts, each year City Council must set an assessment rate levied against businesses within the RVBID and appoint an advisory board to manage RVBID funds and implement improvements and programs. Historically, the City Council has appointed the Riviera Village Association (RVA) to manage the RVBID. The advisory board is required to deliver an annual report that identifies improvements and activities proposed by the RVBID for the upcoming calendar year (2025) and highlights the accomplishments for the current Calendar Year (2024).

The RVA recommends an increase to the fee assessment for Calendar Year 2025. The proposed increase represents the first increase to the fee assessment levied on participating businesses since 2005 and is intended to address increased operating expenses associated with inflationary pressures. The increased assessment is expected to raise annual revenue from $79,000 in 2024 to an estimated $106,000 in 2025.

On November 5, 2024, the City Council adopted resolutions to re-appoint the RVA as the BID Advisory Board for 2025 and direct the RVA to prepare a report for 2025. In addition, the proposed Ordinance to increase the assessment levy was approved for first reading and is now ready for formal adoption.

BACKGROUND
The RVBID was established by the City Council in 2003, pursuant to the California Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of the Riviera Village Business District. The City Council formed an Advisory Board for the BID to advise the City Council on the method and basis for the levy of assessments within the BID and the expenditure of revenues derived from those assessments.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Redondo Beach City CouncilNovember 12, 2024

Redondo Beach City Council
November 12, 2024