JI 0C-2/412025
ChatGPT - Feb. 3, 2025
Building a Better Redondo, Inc. (BBR) has been involved in at least two appellate cases against the City of Redondo Beach:
1. Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo Beach (2012): BBR filed a petition for a writ of mandate and declaratory relief, seeking to compel the city to submit a local coastal program amendment to a public vote, in accordance with a recently enacted charter amendment. The trial court ruled in favor of BBR, and although the city appealed, it voluntarily complied with the court's mandate, rendering the appeal moot. casetext.com
2. Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo Beach (2018): BBR challenged the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed waterfront development project, alleging several deficiencies under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The trial court found merit in some of BBR's claims, leading to the decertification of the EIR and an award of over $760,000 in attorney fees to BBR. The city and the developer appealed, but the appellate court upheld the trial court's decision. easyreadernews.com
These cases indicate that BBR has been the appellant in at least two lawsuits against the City of Redondo Beach.
Sources
Building a Better Redondo, Inc. (BBR) has been involved in at least two significant lawsuits since its inception in 2009, both against the City of Redondo Beach. In these cases, BBR was awarded attorney fees, which included the application of multipliers to the base (lodestar) amounts.
Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo Beach (2010):
• Case Overview: BBR filed a petition to compel the city to submit a local coastal program amendment to a public vote, as required by a recently enacted charter amendment.
Attorney Fees Awarded: The trial court awarded BBR attorney fees totaling $313,000.
Multiplier Applied: This amount was determined by applying a 0.25 multiplier to the lodestar figure, reflecting the court's assessment of the complexity and significance of the case.
casetext.com
2. Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo Beach (2018):
Case Overview: BBR challenged the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed waterfront development project, alleging deficiencies under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Attorney Fees Awarded: The trial court awarded BBR over $760,000 in attorney fees
Multiplier Applied: While specific details about the application of a multiplier in this case are not provided in the available sources, the substantial fee award suggests the court recognized the public interest significance and complexity of the litigation.
easyreadernews.com
These cases illustrate BBR's active role in legal actions concerning municipal governance and environmental oversight in Redondo Beach. The awarded attorney fees, enhanced by multipliers, underscore the courts' acknowledgment of the public interest and the challenges involved in such litigation.
Sources
E
40 Building a Better Redondo, Inc. (BBR), established in 2009 as a 501(c)(4) social welfare enhancing he encil velane of the redondo Beach communiy, is atons have primarily focused on ensuring public participation in significant municipal decisions and advocating for sustainable urban development.
Advocacy for Public Voting Rights:
BBR was formed to empower Redondo Beach residents with the right to vote on major commercial and residential zoning actions that could significantly impact traffic and congestion within the city. In 2010, BBR filed a petition for a writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory relief against the City of Redondo Beach, seeking to compel the city to submit certain local coastal program amendments to a public vote, thereby promoting transparency and public involvement in urban planning decisions.
casetext.com
Opposition to New Power Plant Development:
BBR has been a vocal opponent of constructing a new power plant on the Redondo Beach waterfront. The organization supported the "No Power Plant" initiative and urged residents to vote "Yes" on Measure A in the March 5, 2013, election. This measure aimed to prevent the development of a new power plant, reflecting BBR's commitment to environmental preservation and the promotion of sustainable development practices. buildingabetterredondo.org
Through these actions, BBR has contributed to the civic betterment and social improvement of the Redondo Beach community by advocating for increased public participation in governmental decisions and supporting initiatives that align with the community's environmental and developmental interests.
Sources
40 Jim Light, as president of Building a Better Redondo (BBR), has been instrumental in initiating at least two significant measures aimed at influencing land use and development policies in Redondo Beach:
1. Measure DD (2008): BBR sponsored this initiative, which was approved by voters in the November 2008 general election. Measure DD amended the city charter to require that any major changes in allowable land use, such as significant upzoning or large-scale developments, be subject to voter approval. This measure was designed to increase public participation in decisions that could impact traffic, congestion, and the overall quality of life in Redondo Beach.
angellaw.com
2. Measure A (2013): BBR supported this initiative, which sought to prevent the construction of a new power plant on the Redondo Beach waterfront. The measure aimed to rezone the AES power plant site from industrial to parkland and mixed-use development, thereby promoting environmental preservation and sustainable development.
These initiatives reflect BBR's commitment to involving the community in significant land use decisions and promoting sustainable development practices in Redondo Beach Sources
40 You said:
who authored Measure C
Jim Light, president of Building a Better Redondo, co-authored Measure C, a ballot initiative pproved by Redondo Beach voters in March 2017. Measure C introduced new developmen tandards for the city's harbor area, aiming to limit overdevelopment and preserve coastal acces and views.
easyreadernews.com
Sources
E
40 Measure C, a ballot initiative approved by Redondo Beach voters in March 2017, was co- authored by several community members, including:
• Jim Light
• Bill Brand
Candace Nafissi
• Wayne Craig
• Martin Holmes
• Rob Gaddis
Additionally, Councilman Nils Nehrenheim contributed to the authorship of Measure C. redondobeachrotary.org
Measure C introduced new development standards for Redondo Beach's harbor area, aiming to limit overdevelopment and preserve coastal access and views. easyreadernews.com
Sources
40 Jim Light is a founding board member and former president of the South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SPC), a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving open space and creating more parks in the coastal cities of the South Bay area. He has been actively involved in various environmental initiatives and projects through his role in SBPC. southbayparks.org
In 2008, Jim Light, along with Bill Brand, initiated a campaign to shut down the AES power plant in Redondo Beach, aiming to repurpose the site for public parkland and habitat restoration. southbayparks.org
Additionally, Jim Light has been involved in habitat restoration projects, such as the rewilding of Wilderness Park with native plants, reflecting his commitment to environmental conservation and community engagement.
facebook.com
For a more in-depth understanding of Jim Light's involvement with the South Bay Parkland Conservancy, you can watch this discussion featuring him and Jim Montgomery:
Sources
40 The South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SPC) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving and enhancing parklands in the South Bay area. While SBPC engages in various - tundraising activities to support its environmental initiatives, specific information regarding funds raised explicitly for legal defense purposes is not readily available in public records.
According to SPC's financial disclosures, the organization reported total revenues of $110,666 in 2023 and $91,769 in 2022, primarily from contributions. These funds are allocated to projects such as habitat restoration, supporting native wildlife, and community education. For instance, in 2022, SBPC was awarded a $79,000 grant by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to expand habitat restoration at the Esplanade Bluffs.
southbayparks.org
While SBPC's mission includes advocacy for parkland preservation, there is no publicly available information indicating that the organization has allocated funds specifically for legal defense purposes.
Sources
40 You said:
South Bay Parkland Conservancy was the fundraising partner for Rescue our Waterfront. How much was raised during Measure C
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SPC) served as the fundraising partner for the "Rescue Our Waterfront" campaign during the Measure C initiative in Redondo Beach. However, specific details regarding the total amount of funds raised during this campaign are not readily available in public records.
SBPC is a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving and enhancing parklands in the South Bay area. While it engages in various fundraising activities to support its environmental initiatives, detailed financial information about specific campaigns like Measure C is not publicly disclosed
For more information about SPC's projects and initiatives, you can visit their official website:
southbayparks.org
Sources
40 mini
According to publicly available financial records, the South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SBPC) reported the following financial figures for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2022:
• 2017:
Revenue: $33,072
• Expenses: $36,766
• Net Income: -$3,694
Net Assets: $1,763
• 2022:
Revenue: $91,769
• Expenses: $77,720
Net Income: $14,049
Net Assets: $48,640
These figures are based on the organization's Form 990-EZ filings, which provide a summary of financial activities for nonprofit organizations.
projects.propublica.org
Please note that these figures are for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2022. Specific financial data for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, is not readily available in the provided sources.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the South Bay Parkland Conservancy's official website:
southbayparks.org
Sources
40 mini
The South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SPC) has engaged in various projects aimed at enhancing parklands and natural habitats in the South Bay area. While specific details regarding direct funding from the City of Redondo Beach to SPC are not readily available, the organization has received support from other entities for its initiatives.
For instance, in 2022, SBPC was awarded a $79,000 grant by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to maintain and expand habitat restoration at the Esplanade Bluffs. southbayparks.org
Additionally, SBPC has been involved in projects such as the removal of the AES power plant and the establishment of Redondo Beach's first community garden. easyreadernews.com
While these projects contribute to the community's environmental and recreational resources, specific financial contributions from the City of Redondo Beach to SPC are not detailed in the available sources.
For more information about SPC's projects and initiatives, you can visit their official website:
southbayparks.org
Sources
40 mini
You said:
How much has Rescue our Waterfront raised for lawsuits
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Rescue Our Waterfront (ROW) has actively engaged in fundraising to support legal defense efforts related to the revitalization of Redondo Beach's waterfront. In December 2023, ROW organized a Year-End Legal Defense Fundraiser at King Harbor Cantina to support ongoing legal expenses.
rescueourwaterfront.org
While specific figures detailing the total amount raised during this event are not publicly disclosed, ROW has consistently emphasized the need for community support to cover legal costs associated with their advocacy. For instance, in October 2023, ROW held a Legal Defense Fundraiser at R10 Social House, highlighting the financial challenges posed by legal proceedings.
rescueourwaterfront.org
Given the lack of publicly available detailed financial records, the exact amount raised by ROW for legal defense purposes remains unspecified.
For more information about ROW's initiatives and fundraising efforts, you can visit their official website:
rescueourwaterfront.org
Sources
The South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SBPC) has been involved in fundraising efforts for the "Rescue Our Waterfront" (ROW) campaign, particularly to support legal defense initiatives.
However, specific details regarding the total amount raised by SPC for ROW are not publicly disclosed.
SPC is a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving and enhancing parklands in the South Bay area. While it engages in various fundraising activities to support its environmental initiatives, detailed financial information about specific campaigns like ROW is not readily available.
For more information about SBPC's projects and initiatives, you can visit their official website:
southbayparks.org
Sources
40 mini
Yes, there can be potential conflicts of interest when someone serves as the president of both a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization and a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, particularly when it comes to finances. The two types of organizations serve different purposes and have distinct legal and tax structures:
1. 501(c)(4): These organizations are typically formed for social welfare and advocacy purposes. They can engage in lobbying and political activities, and contributions to these organizations are not tax-deductible for donors. They can also endorse political candidates and influence legislation.
2. 501(c)(3): These are charitable organizations focused on educational, religious, scientific, or other charitable purposes. Donations to 501(c)(3) organizations are tax-deductible, and these organizations are prohibited from engaging in political campaigns or substantial lobbying activities.
Potential Conflicts of Interest:
• Use of Funds: If an individual is involved in both organizations, there could be concerns about the use of funds. Donations made to a 501(c)(3) organization are meant to support charitable activities and should not be redirected to support political advocacy or lobbying efforts associated with a 501(c)(4). Misuse of funds could raise legal and ethical concerns.
• Management and Oversight: The person holding leadership positions in both types of organizations could have undue influence over decisions affecting both organizations' finances. This could lead to situations where one organization's funds might be improperly used to support the other, potentially violating nonprofit tax rules. • Political Activities: If a 501(c)(4) organization engages in substantial political activities, there may be restrictions on how those activities are funded and how they are separate from a 501(c)(3)'s nonpartisan status. A person leading both types of organizations must carefully ensure that the political advocacy activities of the 501(c)(4) do not spill over into the activities of the 501(c)(3).
Best Practices to Avoid Conflicts:
• Separation of Activities: The two organizations should maintain clear boundaries in their operations. This includes separating funding streams, activities, and reporting to ensure there's no overlap between advocacy work and charitable functions. • Transparency and Disclosure: Full disclosure to boards, stakeholders, and the public is essential to ensure that any financial or organizational overlaps are handled ethically. • Independent Oversight: Both organizations should have independent boards of directors that provide oversight to prevent any conflicts in decision-making and ensure compliance with tax laws.
If there are any concerns about a potential conflict of interest in a situation where an individual serves as president of both a 501(c)(4) and a 501(c)(3), it is advisable to seek legal counsel to ensure compliance with nonprofit laws and regulations.
40 mini
You said:
how many initiatives has BBR been involved in?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Building a Better Redondo (BBR) has been actively involved in several initiatives aimed at shaping the development and preservation of Redondo Beach. Notable initiatives include:
Measure A (2013): BBR supported Measure A, a ballot initiative that sought to prevent the construction of a new power plant on Redondo Beach's waterfront. The initiative aimed to preserve the area for public use and prevent large-scale residential development. buildingabetterredondo.org
2. King Harbor CARE Initiative: BBR has been involved in the King Harbor CARE initiative, which focuses on the revitalization and sustainable development of the King Harbor area. This initiative emphasizes balancing commercial development with open space and community needs.
facebook.com
Measure DD (2008): BBR was involved in Measure DD, an initiative to amend the Tand use This Cityre aime to gure inter a diver are ice can an into alle decisions.
casetext.com
These initiatives reflect BBR's commitment to community engagement and sustainable development in Redondo Beach.
Sources
Building a Better Redondo (BBR) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to community development and advocacy in Redondo Beach. According to Buzzfile, BBR has been operating for approximately 15 years and is estimated to generate $124,166 in annual revenues. buzzfile.com
As a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, BBR's primary focus is on promoting the common good and general welfare of the community. Unlike 501(c)(3) organizations, 501(c)(4) entities can engage in lobbying and political activities, provided these activities are not their primary purpose.
For more detailed information about BBR's financials and activities, you can visit their official website:
Sources
40 mini
Building a Better Redondo (BBR) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to community development and advocacy in Redondo Beach. While specific details about its funding sources are not publicly disclosed, nonprofit organizations like BBR typically generate revenue through • Individual Donations: Contributions from community members who support the organization's mission.
• Fundraising Events: Organized events such as galas, auctions, or community gatherings designed to raise funds.
Grants: Financial support from foundations, government agencies, or other organizations that align with BBR's objectives.
• Membership Fees: If applicable, fees collected from individuals who join the organization as members.
For more detailed information about BBR's projects and initiatives, you can visit their official website:
Sources
40 mini
You said:
How much money did SBPC report in 2016
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
According to publicly available financial records, the South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SBPC) reported the following financial figures for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017:
. Revenue: $33,072
: Nep Inses: 8532,694
• Net Assets: $1,763
These figures are based on the organization's Form 990-EZ filings, which provide a summary of financial activities for nonprofit organizations.
projects.propublica.org
Specific financial data for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, is not readily available in the provided sources.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the South Bay Parkland Conservancy's official website:
southbayparks.org
Sources
Pi
40 mini
You said:
Jim Light has been a founding board member of the South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SPC) since its inception in 2004. He has served as President twice and remains actively involved in SBPC projects and activities.
cms2.revize.com
In addition to his role with SBPC, Jim Light has served on various city committees and Commission i was appohe Redonde Mayor of Redond Beachin me tary 2024, Polovinistry bassing of Mavor Bill Brand
easyreadernews.com
For more information about Jim Light's work with SBPC, you can watch the following video:
Sources
E
40 mini
No, it is not legal for a 501(c)(3) organization to raise money for a Political Action Committee (PAC). This is because 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted by the IRS in terms of political activities. Here's why:
Prohibition on Political Campaign Activity:
• A 501(c)(3) organization is strictly prohibited from participating in political campaigns or supporting or opposing political candidates. This includes raising funds or donating to a PAC that supports specific candidates.
2. Tax-Deductible Contributions:
• Donations to 501(c)(3) organizations are tax-deductible, and the tax code requires that these organizations remain nonpartisan. Engaging in political activities would jeopardize their tax-exempt status.
3. Limits on Lobbying:
While 501(c)(3) organizations are allowed to engage in some lobbying (attempts to influence legislation), there are strict limits on the amount of resources they can allocate toward lobbying activities. This is distinct from engaging in electoral politics or contributing to PACs, which is not allowed.
If a 501(c)(3) organization is found to be raising money for a PAC, it could risk losing its tax- exempt status and face penalties. Organizations that wish to engage in political activities, including raising funds for PACs, typically do so through a 501(c)(4) (social welfare organization) or a political action committee itself, which are not subject to the same restrictions. However, 501(c)(4) organizations must also be cautious about not making politics their primary activity.
If you are considering fundraising or political engagement as part of an organization's activities, it's crucial to consult with legal experts to ensure compliance with IRS rules and regulations. 40 mini
You said:
Can a PAC utilize a 501c3 for its fundraising?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
A Political Action Committee (PAC) cannot directly utilize a 501(c)(3) organization for its fundraising, as 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from engaging in political campaign activity or fundraising for political purposes.
Here's why this is the case:
1. 501(c)(3) Restrictions:
A 501(c)(3) organization is a tax-exempt charity, and it is strictly prohibited by the IRS from engaging in political activities, which includes supporting or raising funds for political candidates, PACs, or any political purpose. Engaging in such activities would violate the organization's tax-exempt status.
Contributions to a 501(c)(3) are tax-deductible, and these organizations are legally required to remain nonpartisan. Therefore, fundraising for a PAC (which is inherently political would risk losing the 501(c)(3)'s tax-exempt status.
2. PAC Restrictions:
A PAC is designed to raise and spend money to elect or defeat political candidates. It is subject to different rules under the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and other state laws. PACs are typically organized under 501(c)(4) or 527 designations, which allow them to engage in political activities (unlike 501(c)(3) organizations).
3. Separation of Activities:
• If a PAC were to raise funds through a 501(c)(3), it would be considered a violation of the 501(c)(3) rules. The PAC and the 501(c)(3) must maintain separate fundraising and'operational activities. They cannot pool funds, share resources, or engage in joint fundraising efforts for political purposes.
How PACs Fundraise:
PACs can fundraise through other means:
Direct contributions from individuals who are eligible to donate.
Corporate donations (if permitted by state law).
• Fundraising events where proceeds directly support political causes.
However, PACs must do this independently from 501(c)(3) organizations to avoid jeopardizing the nonprofit status of the charity.
Best Practice:
If a PAC wants to fundraise in connection with a nonprofit or charity, they must ensure that the activities are separated, and the PAC must conduct its fundraising efforts independently, complying with all applicable election laws.
For any organization or PAC involved in political fundraising or advocacy, it is always advisable to consult with legal professionals to ensure compliance with all federal, state, and IRS regulations.
40 mini
Commingling of money refers to the mixing of funds from different sources, often from personal and business accounts or funds belonging to different organizations, in a way that is not transparent or properly accounted for. This can be an issue for both nonprofit and for-profit entities, and the IRS has clear rules about how funds should be handled to avoid commingling.
Here's what constitutes commingling of money, particularly in the context of nonprofit organizations or businesses:
1. Mixing Personal and Business Funds:
• If an individual or an organization uses their personal bank account or personal funds to pay for business or organizational expenses, or vice versa, this is considered commingling.
• For nonprofit organizations, this can extend to mixing personal funds with the nonprofit's revenue (donations, grants, etc.), which is against IRS regulations for maintaining the nonprofit's tax-exempt status.
2. Funds from Different Sources:
• If a nonprofit (like a 501(c)(3))) or any entity mixes funds intended for a specific purpose with general operational funds (e.g., using donor funds for a project for general operating expenses instead of the project itself, that constitutes commingling. • Commingling can also occur when the same bank account is used for both charitable funds and non-charitable activities, such as political campaigning.
3. Failure to Keep Separate Accounts:
• Nonprofits are required to keep clear, accurate, and separate accounts for different urposes. For example, a 501(c)(3) organization must keep the donations for charitabl urposes separate from other funds, and any money raised for a Political Actior Committee (PAC) must not be mixed with the nonprofit's funds. • The IRS requires 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations to ensure that their finances are properly segregated, especially when engaging in different types of activities (e.g., political versus charitable activities).
4. Lack of Transparent Financial Records:
• When an entity does not keep clear, accurate, and separate financial records showing how funds are used, this may be considered commingling. For nonprofits, this could risk violating IRS regulations and jeopardize their tax-exemot status Why Is It a Concern?
Commingling funds can create legal and financial issues because it:
Violates the requirement for transparency in financial reporting Obstructs accountability and may lead to misuse of funds.
Can cause an organization to lose its tax-exempt status if it's found that the funds are being improperly used for personal or political purposes.
Best Practices to Avoid Commingling:
Separate Accounts: Use separate bank accounts for business/nonprofit funds and personal funds.
Clear Record-Keeping: Maintain detailed records showing the source of funds and how they are used. This is important for both for-profit and nonprofit entities. • Compliance with Rules: Follow IRS rules about the use of funds for specific purposes (e.g., keeping political activities separate from nonprofit activities). • Audit and Oversight: Regular internal audits and financial oversight can help ensure that funds are being properly handled and that no commingling occurs.
In summary, commingling of funds refers to mixing personal and business or organizational funds, or mixing funds for different purposes (e.g., charitable and political, without proper transparency and accountability. Nonprofits must adhere to strict guidelines to ensure that funds are not misused or improperly combined.
40 mini
Yes, Rescue Our Waterfront (ROW) is a Political Action Committee (PAC). According to their official website, they accept donations and have a mailing address listed as "Rescue Our Waterfront PAC, 511 South Broadway, Redondo Beach, CA 90277." rescueourwaterfront.org
As a PAC, ROW is involved in political activities aimed at influencing public policy and elections, particularly concerning the development and preservation of the Redondo Beach waterfront.
For more information about their mission and activities, you can visit their official website:
rescueourwaterfront.org
Additionally, you can watch a video featuring Jim Light and Jim Montgomery discussing the South Bay Parkland Conservancy, which may provide further context on community preservation efforts in the area:
Sources
40 mini
If a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization is suspected of fundraising for a Political Action Committee (PAC), several authorities can investigate the situation. Here's who typically handles such investigations:
1. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
• The IRS is the primary authority that monitors compliance with tax laws for 501(c)(3) organizations. The IRS investigates potential violations of nonprofit regulations, including improper political activity.
• A 501(c)(3) organization that engages in fundraising for a PAC could risk losing its tax- exempt status. The IRS reviews annual Form 990 filings, which disclose financial activities, including how funds are raised and spent. If a nonprofit is found to be engaging in political activities or fundraising for political purposes (such as supporting a PAC), the IRS may conduct an audit or investigation.
• In extreme cases, the IRS may revoke the organization's tax-exempt status if it finds substantial violations of the rules governing political activity and fundraising
2. Federal Election Commission (FEC)
• The FEC oversees the activities of political action committees (PACs), ensuring they comply with federal election laws. If a 501(c)(3) is suspected of contributing funds to a PAC or engaging in political campaign activities, the FEC could investigate the PAC's actions, particularly if the PAC is involved in election-related activities. • While the FEC typically investigates PACs directly, it may work with the IRS or other agencies to ensure that nonprofit funds are not being misused for political campaigning.
3. State Attorneys General
State Attorneys General have authority over nonprofit organizations within their respective states. They ensure that nonprofits comply with state laws regarding fundraising and charitable activities. If a state attorney general receives a complaint or notice of inappropriate fundraising by a nonprofit (e.g., fundraising for a PAC), they may conduct an investigation
• In some cases, state laws prohibit certain political activities or require specific disclosures for fundraising efforts. If a 501(c)(3) organization is suspected of violating those laws, the state attorney general's office may take action.
4. State or Local Election Authorities
• In some cases, if the fundraising for the PAC involves local elections, state or local election authorities may investigate the matter. They ensure that the activities of PACs and political campaigns comply with local laws.
5. Whistleblowers or the Public
• Investigations can also be triggered by whistleblowers or complaints from the public. If someone within the nonprofit organization or a concerned community member notices illegal or improper fundraising activities, they may file a complaint with the IRS, FEC, or state authorities.
6. Independent Auditors and Legal Advisors
Nonprofits are encouraged to conduct regular internal audits to ensure compliance with laws. If an organization suspects that funds are being improperly handled (e.g., mixed with PAC funds), they may hire an independent auditor or legal counsel to review their practices and ensure they are following all applicable regulations.
Consequences for Fundraising for a PAC:
If a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization is found to be fundraising for a PAC or engaging in political campaign activities, the consequences could include:
• Revocation of Tax-Exempt Status: The nonprofit could lose its 501(c)(3) status and, as a result, its ability to receive tax-deductible donations. •n Fines and Penalties: Both the nonprofit and individuals involved could face financial penalties.
• Legal Action: Depending on the severity of the violation, legal action could be taken by the IRS, FEC, or state authorities.
Best Practices:
Nonprofit organizations must adhere to IRS rules for 501(c)(3) organizations, which explicitly prohibit participation in political campaigns and fundraising for PACs. To avoid violations:
• Keep financial records separate for political and charitable activities.
Ensure that fundraising activities align with the nonprofit's mission and do not involve political campaigning.
• Consult with legal counsel or auditors to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
If a nonprofit organization is suspected of fundraising for a PAC, it is important for that organization to seek legal advice immediately to ensure compliance and mitigate potential risks. 40 mini
Yes, a Political Action Committee (PAC) can collect funds through a 501(c)(4) entity, but there are specific rules and regulations governing how this can be done. Here's a breakdown of how it works:
1. 501(c)(4) Organizations and PACs
• 501(c)(4) organizations are tax-exempt social welfare organizations that can engage in political activities, including lobbying and advocating for or against political candidates, as long as the political activity is not their primary purpose.
A PAC (Political Action Committee) is typically organized to raise funds and contribute to political campaigns or causes. While PACs can directly raise funds from individuals and entities, they are often established as separate entities that must comply with Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations.
2. Fundraising through a 501(c)(4)
• A 501(c)(4) organization can set up a separate fund or arm that raises money specifically for political purposes. This arm may act like a PAC but within the confines of the 501(c)(4)'s broader mission of promoting social welfare. • The 501(c)(4) entity can assist the PAC by providing administrative support, such as ordinating events or collecting donations, as long as the PAC maintains complianc with FEC rules and the 501(c)(4) organization does not direct its resources toward specific candidates or political campaigns.
3. Rules for Commingling Funds
• While a 501(c)(4) organization and a PAC may share some resources, they must maintain separate funds and financial activities for their distinct purposes. • 501(c)(4) social welfare funds cannot be used for political campaigning or PAC- related activities.
• PAC funds should be kept separate from any other funds used by the 501(c)(4) for non-political purposes.
• Fundraising for political purposes (through a PAC) cannot be mixed with a 501(c)(4)'s general social welfare activities.
4. Disclosure and Compliance
• A PAC organized under a 501(c)(4) must still adhere to all the disclosure and reporting requirements of the FEC
• The 501(c)(4) organization, while it can participate in political advocacy, must ensure that political activities do not become its primary activity to retain its tax-exempt status.
The IRS requires 501(c)(4)s to report the amount of money they spend on political activity to maintain transparency.
5. Tax Deductibility
• Donations to a 501(c)(4) organization are not tax-deductible for the donor, as opposed to donations to a 501(c)(3).
• PACs, even if set up by a 501(c)(4), are also not tax-deductible for contributors.
Donations to a PAC go toward influencing political elections or candidates.
6. Potential Pitfalls
• The 501(c)(4) must be careful not to make its political activity its primary focus. If political activities become the primary function of the organization, the IRS may revoke its social welfare tax-exempt status.
Similarly, the PAC must maintain strict compliance with FEC rules, ensuring that donations and expenditures are used for their intended political purposes, and they must report any contributions exceeding certain thresholds.
Example Scenario:
If a 501(c)(4) organization is focused on social welfare and promoting a particular policy, it can create a separate PAC to collect funds for supporting political candidates or initiatives that align with its goals. The PAC can engage in activities such as contributions to political campaigns, independent expenditures, or issue advocacy.
However, the 501(c)(4) and PAC should have distinct financial accounts, and the PAC should report separately to the FEC, while the 501(c)(4) reports its political expenditures to the IRS.
Conclusion:
Yes, a PAC can collect funds through a 501(c)(4) entity, but the key is that the PAC and the 501(c)(4) must maintain separate financial operations and comply with applicable federal and state laws regarding political fundraising and expenditures. The PAC is typically formed as a distinct entity that is governed by FEC regulations, while the 501(c)(4) can provide logistical support, as long as it does not divert its social welfare resources to political activities. 40 mini
Yes, there is a statute of limitations for investigating and prosecuting cases involving commingled funds, but the specific time limit depends on the nature of the offense and the entity involved. Here's how it generally works:
1. IRS and Nonprofit Violations (Commingling of Funds)
• The IRS has the authority to investigate 501(c)(3) organizations and other tax-exempt entities for violations, such as commingling funds (mixing personal, nonprofit, or political funds).
The statute of limitations for the IRS to assess taxes, penalties, or revoke tax-exempt status typically depends on the specific issue:
For most tax violations (e.g., commingling funds in a way that affects tax filings), the IRS typically has 3 years from the date the tax return was filed (or the due date of the return if filed late) to audit and assess penalties. • However, if there is fraud or substantial understatement of income, the statute of limitations can be extended to 6 years.
• For criminal investigations (e.g., fraud), the statute of limitations is generally 6 years from the date of the alleged offense.
If the 501(c)(3) is involved in willful evasion or fraud, there is no statute of limitations for the IRS to investigate and take action.
2. State Law (Commingling in Nonprofit and Business Entities) • State laws may impose their own statutes of limitations for cases involving the mismanagement of funds or fraud. These vary by state but are typically around 3 to 6 years.
If the violation involves fraud, some states may extend the statute of limitations for up to 6 years or more.
3. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and PAC Violations • For political action committees (PACs) and violations of campaign finance laws, the FEC typically has a statute of limitations of 5 years for investigating campaign finance violations, including improper fundraising or commingling of funds • If a PAC is found to have commingled funds improperly (e.g., using nonprofit funds for political purposes), the FEC may impose penalties, and the investigation can last up to 5 years.
4. Criminal Fraud Cases (Commingling of Funds for Personal Gain) • If commingling of funds leads to allegations of fraud, and the case is pursued as a criminal matter, the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution is typically 5 years under federal law for financial fraud.
• In some cases, particularly if fraud is uncovered after an extended period, the statute of limitations may be extended based on the discovery rule, which allows the statute of limitations to begin when the offense is discovered.
5. Civil Cases (Civil Penalties for Commingling)
• Civil lawsuits against individuals or entities accused of commingling funds (for example, if a donor files a lawsuit or a government entity seeks civil penalties) may also have their own statute of limitations, usually between 3 and 6 years depending on the type of violation (e.g., breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, or misrepresentation).
Summary of Time Limits:
• IRS Audit for Nonprofit Violations: 3 years (general), 6 years (fraud or substantial understatement).
• FEC Investigation for PAC Violations: 5 years.
• Criminal Fraud (commingling funds): 5 years.
• State Laws for Mismanagement or Fraud: 3-6 years.
Conclusion:
The statute of limitations for investigating commingled funds depends on the nature of the violation (tax, fraud, campaign finance) and the agency or entity involved (IRS, FEC, state authorities). Generally, it ranges from 3 to 6 years, but there are exceptions, especially for fraudulent activities or cases involving tax evasion or criminal conduct. If you're concerned about specific violations or time limits related to a particular case, consulting a legal professional is advised.
40 mini
Yes, there are statute of limitations related to auditing a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization for violating rules, including fundraising for a Political Action Committee (PAC) or engaging in political activity. Here's a breakdown:
1. IRS and Political Activity Violations
• The IRS is responsible for enforcing rules governing the political activities of 501(c)(3) organizations. These rules prohibit 501(c)(3) organizations from engaging in political campaign activities, including fundraising for or supporting a PAC. • Statute of Limitations for IRS Audits:
General Tax Audits: The IRS generally has 3 years from the date a tax return is filed (or the due date if filed late) to audit and assess any penalties, including those for engaging in prohibited political activities (like fundraising for a PAC). • Substantial Understatement of Income: If there is substantial understatement of income (typically 25% or more), the statute of limitations can be extended to 6 years.
Fraud or Willful Evasion: If the IRS believes the nonprofit has committed fraud or willfully evaded taxes (for example, by using nonprofit funds to support political activities), there is no statute of limitations for investigation. The IRS can audit or take action at any time if fraud is suspected
2. 501(c)(3) Engaging in Political Activity
501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from engaging in political campaign activity. If a 501(c)(3) is suspected of engaging in such activity, such as fundraising for a PAC or supporting political candidates, the IRS has the authority to investigate these violations. • Investigation for Political Activity:
The IRS can take action at any time if it finds evidence of political activity, particularly when that activity jeopardizes the organization's tax-exempt status.
If a 501(c)(3) is found to have engaged in prohibited political activities (like fundraising for a PAC), the IRS can revoke the organization's tax-exempt status
3. FEC and Political Action Committees (PACs)
• While the IRS investigates violations related to tax-exempt status, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) oversees compliance with campaign finance laws, including the activities of PACs.
• FEC Investigation for PAC Violations:
The FEC generally has a 5-year statute of limitations to investigate campaign finance violations, including those involving improper fundraising by or through PACs. If a 501(c)(3) organization improperly raises funds for a PAC or uses its resources for political activity, the FEC can investigate and enforce penalties
4. State Laws and Audits
• State attorneys general or other state regulatory bodies also have the authority to investigate political activities by nonprofits, including violations related to fundraising for a PAC.
• State Statutes of Limitations:
• These laws vary by state, but in most cases, state authorities have a 3 to 6-year statute of limitations to investigate violations related to the misuse of funds or improper political activity by a nonprofit.
5. Key Points to Remember:
• The IRS typically has 3 years from the filing date of a return to audit a nonprofit organization, but this period can be extended to 6 years if there is a substantial understatement of income or no limit if fraud is suspected. • The FEC has 5 years to investigate and enforce campaign finance violations, including the improper use of 501(c)(3) funds for PAC activities. • If a 501(c)(3) organization is found to have violated political activity rules, the IRS can revoke its tax-exempt status, and penalties may be imposed.
Conclusion:
There are statute of limitations for investigating a 501(c)(3) nonprofit's involvement with a PAC or political activity, depending on the nature of the violation:
• IRS: Generally, 3 years, with potential extensions to 6 years for substantial understatements or no limit for fraud
• FEC: Typically 5 years for investigating PAC-related violations. • State Laws: Typically 3-6 years depending on the state.
If a 501(c)(3) nonprofit is suspected of engaging in political activity or fundraising for a PAC, there are specific time frames within which investigations can occur, but these time limits can vary depending on the severity of the violation.
40 mini
Nels 1s a real dick
Jim Light
Sent from mur iPad
Nega lorwarded menare
Prem: Wh Wrenheim nets schranheim same sort
Meply-To: mis nehrenhoung gman com
he should was awas from preschting anthiny inher than the law it. which can he done aller the ches tom
Please we mi emal helen re shat
We need the ENTRE I1 careful wash intratony the law wat with ansthing measure ( . And be & NIKEMIL Y carelul with "Jim tighs and anthing Measure (' Poople me voting anana menute tus because thes think hen assaated with Measure CROW after 1 respectful informed the voter that ROW has mahim to do with fim lught suddenla « herame a unflerent coetsaton This polines, Sol anthing dos Were selling measure, we are mod en thing las summer swing
artin did aralace, dens can stand io yee non two teet with dicamore, and nen to in arder te hurther the perama that Re-re now. the a mard rather the new yard with a new stalle DIs Neil Nicawke ( and the asseated swun'
→ Like @ Comment & Share ¿ Share
Council candidate role
[Redondo Beach councilmember] Nils
Nehrenheim needs to describe the nature of
his relationship with rescueourwaterfront.
org during his time as an elected public
servant.
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Sent: 2/20/2016 2:45:10 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subj: Re: Is ROW (Rescue Our Waterfront) an IRS Exempt Organization? It is not. In fact, were not really anything other than a grassroots org.
We're collecting our funds through BBR, building a better Redondo, which is a 501c4. Non-profit, but not tax deductible as it is involved in political campaigns. -Nils
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 2:42 AM
Subject: Is ROW (Rescue Our Waterfront) an IRS Exempt Organization? To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Nils Nehrenheim <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]
Candace/Nils/Martin/Jim,
4 Is ROW (Rescue Our Waterfront) an IRS Exempt Organizationeligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions (Publication 78)? If so, what is the name of the Exempt Organization and what is the EIN (Employer Identification Number)?
The EIN is also known as a federal Tax Identification Number (TIN), and is used to identify a business or nonprofit entity. An EIN is a unique 9-digit number, similar to a Social Security Number for an individual.
Thanks,
Roy
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Sent: 2/18/2016 11:04:16 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subj: Re: The Village Annual Meeting - February 17 @6:30PM And so much more!
If you have something you would like to donate to us please eman [email protected]!
If you cant make our Fundraiser please consider donating any amount by clicking here
com donatel P Bunding-A Better Redonde:
DED.
-19
RescueOurWaterFront.org
* A CE RescueOurWaterFront @RscueDurWtrFrnt
Revaize, not SuPERsto the Redondo hartor
10/22/2016 Building a Better Redondo - Give Now
Building a Better Redondo
Like Message Save More
Free Fundraising Tools by piryx
Building a
Better Redondo SCUE
Home
About
Photos
Likes
Videos
Give Now
Posts
Ciente D 2144
Rescue Our Waterfront
http://Www.rescueourwaterfront.org
Help us Rescue Our Waterfront from overdevelopment. We can revitalize without supersizing! After over two years of trying achieve a balance of the development planned for our harbor and pier, it is clear neither CenterCal nor the City intend to address the reasonable concerns and recommendations of the residents of Redondo. In fact, each time CenterCal has come back with a new plan, it has only gotten more dense and more impactful. Now we have a very biased and flawed Draft Environmental Report and are on the fast track to granting development entitlements to CenterCal. The time to act is now, time is running out.
It is time residents prepare to force the balance the city and CenterCal refuse to give us. We need to build up funds sc hat we can act via legal means, referendum or initiative to Rescue Our Waterfront Please join us and donate to help us preserve, protect and ensure balanced revitalization of our waterfront.
Contribution Amount
$25
•
S50
•
$100
$250
•
•
$500
•
S Chat (6)
https://www.facebook.com/Building-a-Better-Redondo-182321966774/app/121629204551128/ 1/2 Stop CenterCal from Ignoring Measure C! https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage From: Rescue Our Waterfront <[email protected]> To:
Subject: Stop CenterCal from Ignoring Measure C!
Date: Thu, Mar 23, 2017 10:56 am
ETERFRO
Revitalize NOT Supersize!
News Updates!
1) Stop CenterCal From Ignoring Measure C
2) Town Hall March 30 at 7pm Samba
Stop CenterCal From Ignoring Measure
Thanks to you we have handily won the Measure C battle with 57% of the vote. Now we must win the war.
Despite an overwhelming rejection of the CenterCal Waterfront project with the passage of Measure C, CenterCal intends to ignore our vote, just like they ignored all our input on the design for their mall in our harbor. If you were confused before, it should be clear now:
CenterCal does not care about our community, they only care about profit.
After Measure C passed, CenterCal CEO Fred Bruning wrote:
"Despite yesterday's outcome, it is likely that The Waterfront will still move forward... We will continue to work toward approval from the California Coastal Commission. We will continue to do everything we can to turn The Waterfront into a reality, because you deserve it."
We do not deserve to be ignored any longer by those with money and power who believe we won't be able to fight them. We do not deserve to have CenterCal throw our vote in . We do not deserve to have CenterCal stomp over the democratic will of our :
community to build their mall.
Since CenterCal has deep pockets to pursue this war against Redondo Beach residents, 1 of 3 3/24/20178:11 AM
Stop CenterCal from Ignoring Measure C!
https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage
our victory is not yet guaranteed. Our best insurance policy is to continue both our appeal with the Coastal Commission and our lawsuit against the CenterCal project. The lawsuit would force CenterCal to redesign a project that complies with Measure C or to leave town. Our judge has been assigned and will give our position a fair hearing at our court date in July. We have a very strong case in court. It is unlikely CenterCal would get project funding while the lawsuit is active.
Our attorney, Frank Angel, has agreed to cap our fees for the lawsuit at a total of $90,000.
We are represented by one of the top environmental lawyers in California and he has agreed to discounted rates and a cap, so the $90,000 is only a small fraction of the cost to fight CenterCal. It may seem like a huge number, but this is a bargain! Luckily we have also identified a donor willing to match your contributions up to $25,000. We need to raise $25,000 by the end of the month! That means the community needs to contribute $12,500 so that our donor will contribute $12,500 and we can pay our immediate $25,000 bill to get started.
We won the Measure C battle but CenterCal has not conceded, so we must now win the war on the other two fronts. Now is not the time to back down. Please donate whatever you can afford.
We encourage you to donate to our partner South Bay Parkland Conservancy. Your donations to SPC will be used for the lawsuit and are tax-deductible.
Please send checks to:
South Bay Parkland Conservancy
115 S Guadalupe Avenue, Unit H
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
If you would rather donate using a credit card online, you can donate to ROW but your donation will not be tax-deductible. You can make a non-tax-deductible donation to ROW here: www.rescuegunwaterfroot.ors/surpor "You must indicate your occupation on each check*
*We cannot accept cash*
Town Hall March 30 at 7pm Samba
Rescue Our Waterfront has never advocated status quo or stagnation. We want to improve and revitalize our harbor businesses and infrastructure. We invite all residents who feel the same - whether you supported Yes on C or No on C - to join us and discuss our future. Light appetizers will be served
Event: Town Hall
Date: Thursday, March 30
Time: 7-9pm
Location: Samba Brazilian Steakhouse, 207 N Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 if 3
3/24/20178:11 AM
Stop CenterCal from Ignoring Measure C! https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/PrintMessage DOND RescueOurWaterFront.org
EAC RescueOurWaterFront @RscueOurW/trFrnt
Revitalize, not SUPERSize the Redondo Harbor
Paid For by Rescue Our Waterfront PAC ID# 1387229
Be sure to check us out online, on Facebook and Twitter! Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list Paid For by Rescue Our Waterfront PAC ID# 1387229
3 of 3 3/24/2017 8:11 AM
i Like 5) Follow # Share
Rescue our Waterfront
March 31. 2017
When CenterCal declared war on Redondo Beach by filing a 514 million lawsuit against the city and claiming Measure C doesn't apply to them. they only emboldened our community Last night over 100 residents came to our town hall meeting to discuss their hopes and ideas for the future It was an amazing outpouring of positive support. That night residents also donated Rescue our over $11,000 to keep our lawsuit going against CenterCal. Total donations Waterfront are -542.000 We are overwhelmed by the financial support and inspired by your dreams of a better Redondo! Hope to see you at Saturday's Victory Awards Celebration (4pm at R10) and Tuesday's City Council Pizza Party (6pm at 115 Diamond St).
Home
We need a total of $90,000 for our lawsuit and there is still time 10 have your Posts donations doubled!
About Option 1: Donate online
We rescueournatertont orgrsupport
Events
Option 2: Take advantage of tax season by mailing a tax-deductible donation Give Now check to our partners
South Bay Parkland Conservancy
Photos 115 S Guadalupe Ave. Unit H
Redondo Beach. CA 90277
Videos
Rescue our Waterfront
You did it! The community rallied together to contribute $15.000 in 10 days towards bills needed to start a lawsuit For a while we weren't sure we'd meet our goals but in the end you did it! We're now broke but our attorney is busy preparing the legal arguments that lay the groundwork for our case That lawsuit will be filed by November 18
Rescue Our Waterfront. Building a Better Redondo. and South Bay Parkland Conservancy partnered to pursue a lawsuit against the City of Redondo Beach for violations of CEQA the California Coastal Act, and city zoning when City Council approved the CenterCal Waterfront Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) The City approved the project knowing the proposed Seaside Lagoon puts children at risk and that Harbor Patrol believes the Mole B boat ramp is inherently dangerous CenterCal. not the City will bear the cost of the lawsuit ROW supports revitalization but does not believe we need to double development, double traffic. block views. and put children and boaters at risk to accomplish the badly needed renovations
ROW understands the lawsuit will require a long and expensive effort that pits community groups against the city and a large corporation. ROW is confident the judicial system will recognize the many illegal flaws in this bloated and dangerous project.
We encourage you to donate to our partner South Bay Parkland Conservancy Your donations to SBPC are tax-deductible
Please send checks to
South Bay Parkland Conservancy
115 S Guadalupe Avenue. Unit H
Redondo Beach. CA 90277
If you would rather donate using a credit card online. you can donate to ROW but your donation will not be tax-deductible. You can make a non-tax- deductible donation to ROW here:
hip wwww.rescuecuraterrent org suppor
SQUE
TERFRO
Rescue our
-1 = 5i*(t Bedond: ans Scum Bar
Waterfront
zong when its beansearces the Central Wanton ans
Home Tessa prorove: the Dropst
te bapoon puts a greatrok and that
=eMos Entatramp therent dangerous:
Gre Nola do tobitton and homes st
take acorost metal neededrent
eaglesmen insure core as BOW
cassand cangerous posed
rory to denou cater Son Bay Pantalis
Pese send checkers
Redonde BesID CA 017
that arogram ust a great card pohe you can do ate
50k tuxedonist most enter you can. 00s# 300702
• Furtial
Lin Messaging Notfications For Business 50% Off
Home
Jim Light 2nd
Retired
• City of Redondo Beach
• University of Califoria
Redondo Beach, California, United States • Contact info 500+ connections
Barbara Johnson CISSP CCSP ISSMP CISA CISM CRISC CDPSE. Nelson Zager. and 4 other mutual connections
Message (More)
Activity
640 followers
Jim Light commented on a post • lyr
That is back to the future. Before AFSpComm, career progression for space folks was a mix of ops and acquisition. It was AFSpComm that separated acquisition from ops.
They also excluded engineers from operations at first.
Show all comments →
Experience
Mayor, City of Redondo Beach.-:
City of Redondo Beach • Part-time
Feb 2024 - Present • 1yr 1 mo
Redondo Beach, California United Siates - On-site
South Bay Parkland Conservancy
20yrs 5 mos
President
Dec 2021 - Present • 3 yrs 3 mos
Redondo Beach. California, United States
Director
Oct 2004 - Feb 2022 - 17 yrs 5 mos
Founding Member and current Director of the South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SPC). SBPC is dedicated to enhancing and expanc. see more Retired
Freelance
Aug 2021 - Present • 3 yrs 7 mos
Redondo Beach. California, United States
Commissioner
Redondo Beach Harbor Cammission - Part-time
Aug 2016 - Fed 2024 7yrs 7 mos
Redondo Beach California. United States
Commissioner and Former Chairman of the Redondo Beach Harbor Commission. The Commission is made up of Redondo Beach residents wh...
Member
Redondo Beach General Plan Advisory Committee (SPAC) • Part-time Oct 2018 - Jan 2024 • 5 yrs 4 mos
Appointed Citizen's Committee to help draft new General Plan including a new Housing Element, and Recreation and Parks Element for the City of...
Show all 15 experiences →
Education
University of California
Certification, California Naturalist
Jan 2022 - Feb 2022
hapman Universit
IBA, Leadership, Organizational Behavior, Corporate Strateg 1990 - 1991
Show all 3 educations →
Skills
C4ISR
> Endorsed by James Keeney who is highly skilled at this Endorsed by 2 colleagues at SAIC
in 20 endorsements
Endorsed by Joseph DeHaven and 9 others who are highly skilled at this dorsed by Barbara Johnson CISSP CCSP ISSMP CISA CISM CRIS DPSE (mutual connectio
0: 38 endorsements
Show all 25 skills →
Recommendations
Received Given
Nothing to see for now
Recommendations that Jim receives will appear here.
Interests
Top Voices Companies Schools
Melinda French Gates in
Founder of Pivotal. Co-founder of the Gates Foundation. Author of The Moment of Lift.
6628,192 followers
3/18/2021 TY Form 990N
TIN:
ON°. 1545-000
Form 990-N Electronic Notice (e-Postcard)
• For Tax-Exempt Organizations not Required to File Form 990 or 990EZ. 2018 A For the calendar year, or tax year beginning 01-01-2018, and ending 12-31-2018 B Check if applicable: D Employer ID number
NOT BY PAT CONSERVANCY
L Termination 32-0124116
M Gross receipts are normally 22I5 ARTESA BIV. FP , box, if mail is not delivered to stret adress) $50,000 or less
E Website Address:
southbayparks.org Re done Beach, A 9027y, and 21P + 4
F Name of Principal Officer:
Jacob Varvarigos
Number and street (or P. O. box, if mail is not delivered to street address) of Principal Officer
2215 ARTESIA BLVD. #1821
City or town, state or country, and ZIP + 4
Redondo Beach, CA 90278
Form 990-N (2018)
Additional Data
Thank you for using Aplos Software to complete your Form 990-N. www.aplos.com
Software ID: 12000256
Software Version:
EIN: 32-0124116
Name: SOUTHBAY PARKLAND CONSERVANCY
https://www.aplos.com/aws/efile/990n/receipt/25699/preview 1/1 4 Mail ail = 1:32 AM 100% 142
businesssearch.sos.ca.gov
N
State of California
Secretary of State
Statement of Information G581944
¡Domestic Nonprofit Cred:: Union and General Coopera re Corporationas FILED
Fring Fee: 520.00 see instructions.
URORTANT. HEADINSIRUCTMAS RESORE COMPIFTING THIS LORI
in me office al the Gotrely of State
of the State el Cartoria
SOUNDAT PARLANE CONSERR
APR-16 2019
Complate Prie pal Chica Arres
A08 VARARICO2 VOOMED AVE 2014 BEACH CARS
Nantes and Cumphie Addresses n. the rolloses Onwere
NIB ANDERSON AREAS GOS
11 LIGHT
DAWN ESSCA DISE CARNELINE RESORE DEAD, CA - 212
Agent to Serice of Picass
ACO ANCES AD 40008
Taken Mind Toehonore
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO
EIN: 27-0812384 | Redondo Beach, California, United States Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Organizations who have filed a 990-N (e-Postcard) annual electronic notice. Most small organizations that receive less than $50,000 fall into this category.
^ Tax Year 2023 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2023(01/01/2023-12/31/2023) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2021 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2021(01/01/2021-12/31/2021) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James A Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2020 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2020(01/01/2020-12/31/2020) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James A Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway
Reronan Rearh rA 91277
... -MI
^ Tax Year 2019 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2019(01/01/2019-12/31/2019) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James A Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway NA
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2018 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2018(01/01/2018-12/31/2018) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James A Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States:
^ Tax Year 2017 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2017(01/01/2017-12/31/2017) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James A Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2016 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2016 (01/01/2016-12/31/2016) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Address:
Business as):
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO 602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2015 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater than:
2015(01/01/2015-12/31/2015) 602BS Broadway $50,000
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
EIN: United States Organization has terminated:
27-0812384 No
Principal Officer's Name and
Organization Name (Doing Address: Website URL:
Business as): James A Light www.buildingabetterredondo.org
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2014 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater than:
2014(01/01/2014-12/31/2014) 602B S Broadway $50,000
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
EIN: United States Organization has terminated:
27-0812384 No
Principal Officer's Name and
Organization Name (Doing Address: Website URL:
Business as): James A Light www.buildingabetterredondo.org
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO
602BS Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2013 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater than:
2013(01/01/2013-12/31/2013) 602B S Broadway $50,000
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
EIN: United States Organization has terminated:
27-0812384 No
Principal Officer's Name and
Organization Name (Doing Address: Website URL:
Business as): James A Light www.buildingabetterredondo.org
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2012 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater than:
2012 (01/01/2012-12/31/2012) 602B S Broadway $50,000
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
-.. -
Organization Name (Doing Principal Officer's Name and Website URL:
Business as): Address: www.buildingabetterredondo.org
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO James A Light
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2011 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater than:
2011(01/01/2011-12/31/2011) 602B S Broadway $50,000
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
EIN: United States Organization has terminated:
27-0812384 No
Principal Officer's Name and
Organization Name (Doing Address: Website URL:
Business as): James A Light www.buildingabetterredondo.org
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2010 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2010(01/01/2010-12/31/2010) 602B S Broadway than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
27-0812384 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): James Light
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO Website URL:
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
^ Tax Year 2009 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater than:
2009(01/01/2009-12/31/2009) 602B S Broadway $50,000
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
EIN: United States Organization has terminated:
27-0812384
Principal Officer's Name and
Organization Name (Doing Address: Website URL:
Business as): James A Light www.buildingabetterredondo.org
BUILDING A BETTER REDONDO
602B S Broadway
Redondo Beach, CA 90277
United States
PARKLAND Q
Donate & Become a
Member Today
ntr utions make a
dif
SUPPORT US NOW!
As a member of the South Bay Parkland Conservancy, your donation and support help better our community by
encouraging and assisting with the acquisition of parklands and nelping to restore native nabitar in ine sourn bay. Ine funds collected are wisely invested in:
• Projects like rewilding Wilderness Park to bring back native habitat
• Supporting native wildlife and pollinators
• Creating opportunities for education and volunteers
with students and local scouts and the community
• Connecting butterfly habitat to support migration and breeding with projects like the recent Esplanade Bluff
Garden revitalization
• Advocating for gardens (Redondo Beach Community
Garden), parkland, open space, and native habitats
throughout the South Bay
As a member, you will receive a monthly newsletter (if you are not already signed up) about the South Bay Parkland Conservancy updates on all projects, member highlights, upcoming events, and selected activities. Members will also be invited to an annual member meeting (details TBD).
The South Bay Parkland Conservancy (SBPC) was founded in the summer of 2004, and incorporated as a 501 (c)(3) non- profit in the State of California in November of 2004.
Contributions made to the SBPC are tax-deductible
to the extent allowed by law. Monetary contributions to the SBPC will help with our community outreach, and
help to cover costs for materials and supplies for regular operations and special events.
501 (c)(3) non-profit organization
Federal ID #: 32-0124116
OTHER WAYS TO SUPPORT
SBPC
Join the Legacy Circle SONEY GIRE
Our Legacy Circle members believe
in the power of vision and bold
action. Their generous contributions
($10,000 or more) enable South
Bay Parkland Conservancy to continue identifying projects that uphold our founding principles and provide the
resources to start and complete significant projects. This level of giving allows the SBPC to extend to a broader, more
comprehensive vision for habitat connectivity and open
parkland, creating opportunities and bypassing roadblocks - bringing the vision to life. Contact [email protected]
VOLUNTEER YOUR TIME & SKILLS
You can also help SBPC by assisting in outreach programs and events or volunteering your skills and experience.
Wilderness Park restoration days and other volunteer
opportunities are posted on our website as well as on Social Media and shared via our newsletter. Contact
[email protected]
CERTIFY YOUR NATIVE HABITAT
You can help SBPC expand native habitat by joining our
Certified California Native Habitat program and converting your yard to a California Native Habitat! Fill out the
application online to get started.
CORPORATE PARTNERSHIPS
Companies can help make all the difference for one project, one restoration site, or one initiative. Opportunities vary from joining us in restoration work to supporting events, initiatives, and communitv programs. We alwaus recoanize vour
generous assistance via our database and sociat media ana are excited about working with you year-round to help with your community and sustainability goals. Contact
[email protected]
WEAR SBPC MERCHANDISE
We're so grateful to have an amazing graphic designer who updated our Heron logo! Help us spread the word about our work by sporting SPC gear, including hats and t-shirts, available here. Let us know what else you'd like to see. Hat styles, t-shirt styles, sweatshirts! Anything. Email
[email protected]
IN KIND DONATIONS
From tools, to wood chips, volunteer appreciation gifts and baby trees - we appreciate your donations. If you have
something to donate, please contact [email protected] Partners, Supporters,
Sponsors
The organizations, companies, schools, cities, and counties below have supported us, sponsored us, partnered with us, and contributed to our efforts. We would not be able to fulfill our mission without their support and that of our volunteers, the heart of our organization.
Southbay Parkland Conservancy
EIN: 32-0124116 | Redondo Beach, California, United States Other Names
SOUTH BAY PARKLAND CONSERVANCY
Publication 78 Data
Organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions. Users may rely on this list in determining deductibility of their contributions.
On Publication 78 Data List: Yes
Deductibility Code: PC ®
Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Organizations who have filed a 990-N (e-Postcard) annual electronic notice. Most small organizations that receive less than $50,000 fall into this category.
V Tax Year 2021 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2020 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2019 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2018 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
^ Tax Year 2016 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Tax Period: Mailing Address: Gross receipts not greater 2016(01/01/2016-12/31/2016) 115 S Guadalupe Ave H than:
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $50,000
EIN: United States
32-0124116 Organization has
Principal Officer's Name and terminated:
Organization Name (Doing Address: No
Business as): Melanie Cohen
SOUTHBAY PARKLAND Website URL:
CONSFRVANCY
mиnрь.т.
Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Conservancy
United States
V Tax Year 2015 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2014 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2013 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2012 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2011 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2010 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
V Tax Year 2009 Form 990-N (e-Postcard)
Copies of Returns (990, 990-EZ, 990-PF, 990-T)
Electronic copies (images) of Forms 990, 990-EZ, 990-PF or 990-T returns filed with the IRS by charities and non-profits.
V Tax Year 2022 Form 990EZ
V Tax Year 2017 Form 990EZ