City Council on 2025-02-11 6:00 PM - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER Meeting Time: 02-11-25 18:00
eComments Report
Meetings Meeting
Time
Agenda
Items
Comments Support Oppose Neutral
City Council on 2025-02-11 6:00 PM -
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
02-11-25
18:00
64 73 1 64 1
Sentiments for All Meetings
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
City Council on 2025-02-11 6:00 PM - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 02-11-25 18:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
J.1. 25-0186 For eComments and Emails Received from the Public 1 0 1 0 L.1. 25-0196 PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST
READING OF ORDINANCES AMENDING TITLE 6 BUSINESSES,
PROFESSIONS, AND TRADES, TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2, ZONING AND LAND USE AND TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN
IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO CANNABIS
REGULATIONS, ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE
AMENDMENTS
PROCEDURES:
1. Open the public hearing, take testimony and deliberate;
2. Close the public hearing; and
3. Introduce the following three ordinances and adopt the following resolution:
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-25, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 6 TO TITLE 6 OF THE
REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE COMMERCIAL
CANNABIS BUSINESSES
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3288-25, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2 SECTION 10-2.1626 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING
TO COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES INLAND ZONES OF THE
CITY
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3289-25, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 SECTION 10-5.1626 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING
TO COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES IN COASTAL ZONES OF
THE CITY
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2502-004, A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING CERTIFICATION BY THE
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE
COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE (TITLE
10, CHAPTER 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE) CONSISTENT WITH
STATE LAW, WHICH IS INTENDED TO BE CARRIED OUT IF A
MANNER FULLY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COASTAL ACT; AND
PROVIDING THAT THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S LOCAL
COASTAL PROGRAM WILL TAKE EFFECT AUTOMATICALLY UPON
COASTAL COMMISSION APPROVAL PURSUANT TO PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE SECTION 30514 AND TITLE 14, SECTION 13551
OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS
69 0 61 1
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
P.1. 25-0203 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE
CITY COUNCIL'S POLICY POSITION ON CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL (SB) 71 (WIENER) WHICH SEEKS TO MAKE PERMANENT THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) EXEMPTIONS
FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS NOW GRANTED ON A TEMPORARY
BASIS UNDER SB 288
DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF A
LETTER AND/OR RESOLUTION ARTICULATING THE COUNCIL'S
POSITION ON THE BILL
3 1 2 0
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for J.1. 25-0186 For eComments and Emails Received from the Public Overall Sentiment
Carol Martin
Location:
Submitted At: 3:53am 02-07-25
Opposition to the yearly event Super Bowl Run in Redondo Beach, street of South Catalina. This is a demand (request) to relocate this yearly event to a more suitable location and not inconvenience the residents, especially the the senior citizens now residing at
123 S. Catalina Ave, Casa de los Amigos, public transportation (bus) and resident transportation Dial-A-Ride.
This event has placed a harness on the residents daily life. Senior citizens must have driving and walking access to their destinations, also, Fire Department access. It is not convenient for seniors to park or walk 1-3 blocks away from their home. Further concerns to be discussed at Open Meeting. Sincerely, Carol Martin, Casa de los Amigos resident. Thank you.
Agenda Item: eComments for L.1. 25-0196 PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES AMENDING TITLE 6 BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONS, AND TRADES, TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2, ZONING AND LAND USE AND TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO CANNABIS REGULATIONS,
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE
AMENDMENTS
PROCEDURES:
1. Open the public hearing, take testimony and deliberate;
2. Close the public hearing; and
3. Introduce the following three ordinances and adopt the following resolution:
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-25, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 6 TO TITLE 6 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESSES
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3288-25, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2 SECTION 10-2.1626 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES INLAND ZONES OF THE CITY INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3289-25, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 SECTION 10-5.1626 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES IN COASTAL ZONES OF THE CITY ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2502-004, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING CERTIFICATION BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE (TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE)
CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW, WHICH IS INTENDED TO BE CARRIED OUT IF A MANNER FULLY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COASTAL ACT; AND PROVIDING THAT THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM WILL TAKE EFFECT AUTOMATICALLY UPON COASTAL COMMISSION APPROVAL PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 30514 AND TITLE 14, SECTION 13551 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS Overall Sentiment
Joanna Edwards
Location:
Submitted At: 10:57pm 02-11-25
I oppose retail marajuana sales in our city. How many times must the residents of this great city vote “no” for the message to be heard?
Brianna Egan
Location:
Submitted At: 7:08pm 02-11-25
I oppose retail cannabis dispensaries in the city. If the council chooses to proceed with an ordinance, location restrictions and buffers should make it so that no one area of the city would become a hotspot for these stores, especially taking care to ensure that Artesia does not become this hotspot, given the number of young families and youth living in close proximity to the Artesia corridor.
The staff report states that "each licensed site in Redondo Beach could provide $225,000 to $450,000 in additional annual General Fund cannabis business tax revenue, provided the City moves forward with the adoption of a regulatory ordinance at a tax rate of 4.5%." If the city council is motivated by tax revenue, they should note that there are other viable ways to increase revenue and reduce spending in the city, such as enabling the production of new housing, streamlining business development and reducing vacancies, and avoiding costly lawsuits.
Mai Truong
Location:
Submitted At: 6:46pm 02-11-25
No. We do NOT want cannabis stores in our city of RB!
Kristi Mickler
Location:
Submitted At: 6:37pm 02-11-25
Dear City Council and Mayor,
I strongly oppose allowing retail cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. Our residents have already spoken by voting NO on Measure E, rejecting three dispensaries and legal recreational delivery. Moving forward with similar proposals disregards the will of the community.
1. Respect the Voters’ Decision – Measure E’s rejection made it clear that residents do not want cannabis businesses in our city. Revisiting this issue undermines their choice.
2. Harmful to Youth – Dispensaries increase cannabis visibility, making it more appealing to minors. Early use harms brain development, academic performance, and increases addiction risk. Our city should focus on protecting young people, not exposing them to more temptation.
3. Public Safety Risks – Cannabis businesses often attract crime, including theft and illicit drug activity. Law enforcement resources are already limited, and dispensaries will only add to the burden.
4. Decline in Community & Property Values – Residents choose Redondo Beach for its safe, family-friendly environment. Dispensaries could bring increased traffic, loitering, and negatively impact property values.
5. Questionable Economic Benefits – While tax revenue is often cited as a benefit, the costs of enforcement, regulation, and public health programs may outweigh any financial gains.
For these reasons, I urge the City Council to reject any proposals allowing retail cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. We must prioritize community well-being over short-term financial interests.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Kristi Mickler
Darice and Jeff Mason
Location:
Submitted At: 5:36pm 02-11-25
We are homeowners and residents within district one and we are adamantly opposed to having retail cannabis dispensaries or businesses within our city. We feel this could be detrimental to our property values. We believe this will negatively impact the safety and health of our community members and will result in an increase need for police response as well as present an easier pathway for our city’s youth to have access to this product. We have a great city but have other issues that need to be addressed without adding an additional source of problems.
Let’s be the city that sets the precedent to stay above the lure of the possible tax income benefits. We stress a no vote for this topic.
Christina Martin
Location:
Submitted At: 5:14pm 02-11-25
Listen to the voters who voted previously and to others now as the more accessible it is in the community the more it will increase in youth usage.
Kari Chatterji
Location:
Submitted At: 4:54pm 02-11-25
I am strongly opposed to cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach and the normalization of cannabis in our youth. Artesia blvd is already known for its dive bars, smoke shops and fast food, can’t we do better for our community and our kids? Please tell me you think so. I do not want Redondo Beach with our award winning RBUSD "best school district in Los Angeles" to be the only beach city with storefront dispensaries. If someone needs their product drive 5 miles any which way and get it, why does it need to be right here in our community? The only thing I can think of is that it benefits the council members because it certainly doesn’t benefit our community. Please prove that theory wrong and do what is right for our Beloved RB.
Maricela Guillermo
Location:
Submitted At: 4:33pm 02-11-25
We strongly oppose the ordinances allowing retail cannabis store ANYWHERE in our beloved city. Please consider adopting the delivery-only model for BOTH medicinal and recreational cannabis. If a business requires extra security and most residents do not support it, this raises concerns about whether such businesses are truly in the best interest of our community. Additionally, without the financial models or projections being shared with the public, it’s difficult to fully assess the potential impact on our city. I urge you to prioritize the well-being of our youth and residents, making informed decisions based on transparency and the long-term interests of our community, rather than giving undue weight to specific interests or agendas. I will NOT vote for anyone supporting retail cannabis stores this election season. I hope my fellow residents will join me!!! Melissa Scheuerman
Location:
Submitted At: 4:17pm 02-11-25
I am against retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. Having retail cannabis locations in Redondo Beach will not benefit the city enough to pay for the unintended negative consequences it will most definitely have on our youth.
Elma Pulido
Location:
Submitted At: 4:01pm 02-11-25
I am opposed to cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach and the normalization of cannabis in our youth. I do not want Redondo Beach with our award winning RBUSD “best school district in Los Angeles” to be the only beach city with storefront dispensaries.
Karan Millan
Location:
Submitted At: 3:38pm 02-11-25
We voted on this before and overwhelmingly D5, D4 and D3 did not want more cannabis shops. These are the neighborhoods affected and no one want it. It takes a minute to state the truth and years to tell a lie.
Karen Cull
Location:
Submitted At: 3:24pm 02-11-25
I am a District 1 member, parent and I am opposed to retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. 75% of residents voted AGAINST retail cannabis in our city in 2022 via Measure E. The other Beach cities voted no - so why do we have to be the stand out on this? Please vote no on this ordinance.
Lee Phillips
Location:
Submitted At: 3:07pm 02-11-25
Why is this being brought forth? We voted overwhelmingly against cannabis retail shops in our neighborhoods.
Please respect the voters wishes
Nainsi Skiba
Location:
Submitted At: 2:25pm 02-11-25
As a District 4 resident since 2006, I have watched the proliferation of smoke shops and massage parlors take place. The result is an unattractive overabundance of unhealthy and/or illicit businesses turning the Artesia corridor into a tacky thoroughfare, when what residents want is a thriving business district with nice shopping/dining/walkability. North Redondo has more schools and children than District 1, and I'm sure a dispensary would not benefit an area where kids congregate. Artesia has also had the distinction of many terrible vehicle crashes and even fatalities, which may have featured DUI/drugged drivers as well as speeding. Redondo is plagued by dangerous driving and tragic outcomes, on PCH and PV Boulevard as well. The thought of high THC levels/abuse + speeding is a real concern of residents and their families. The "new" cannabis has 5-6 times the potency of the mellow marijuana of the 60s/70s, due to innovations in boosting potency via toxic chemicals such as colchicine -- and other methods. Various varieties are being modified/altered chemically and biologically to produce super weed. A concerning issue of product now is that of various contaminants including pesticides in products which have been certified as clean. Chemicals such as pesticides can be carcinogenic. For consumers utilizing cannabis for medical reasons, that is additionally worrisome. The issue of clean product is an important one. Altogether, use by children and developing young persons can be detrimental to health and safety. Genuinely safer product must be guaranteed. I favor the idea of a delivery model. Artesia doesn't need more smoke shops (some of which illegally sell cannabis-related goods) or a boulevard storefront dispensary (which may be more viable/tolerable by residents on a less busy thoroughfare away from schools/kids/homes). I believe the Measure E-era promotion/videos by one supplier solidified opposition to allowing shops at all. If allowed, the shops must not be adjacent to one another and all precautions must be taken to assure product quality, and the most responsible sellers selected.
Alisa Beeli
Location:
Submitted At: 1:27pm 02-11-25
I strongly OPPOSE retail storefront cannabis in Redondo Beach. I am concerned about potential detrimental effects on our community and our youth. Please listen to your constituents. We do not want this, in the North or the South. Thank you, Council Member Behrendt and the Planning Commission for recommending the buffer zone around Dale Page Park. However we very much would prefer that we have NO storefront cannabis stores ANYWHERE in Redondo Beach. Thank you!
Kimberly Brooke
Location:
Submitted At: 1:08pm 02-11-25
Why is this being brought forth? We voted overwhelmingly against cannabis retail shops in our neighborhoods.
Please respect the voters wishes.
AA Settipane
Location:
Submitted At: 12:29pm 02-11-25
Why is this city even considering this as a legitimate option? Cannabis does not belong in Redondo, period.
Neither do the 200 smoke shops and foot massages that are all over the city.
Why not, instead, incentivize more class A office space to be added and built and encourage premium employers and premium businesses to open HQs or open offices in Redondo? Why not focus on pier improvements and fixing the mall which is now a literal storage parking lot? MB, HB and ES won’t do this, so why should RB? Why can’t this city council do anything to attract and keep premium employers and premium businesses? Does no one in RB understand what excellence is? This cannabis nonsense is not. In fact, you already have a school district in a deficit: so why bring in more undesirable businesses that will push away families into the neighboring cities? The smell alone will permeate neighborhoods (or did you do no research on the impact of Med Men, Erba or other dispensaries?)
Redondo needs to refocus on being a premium destination, with premium employers and premium tourism, not premium drug sales. The mall is a shameful eyesore, losing all business to MB Village, The Point in ES and Del Amo, yet this council is focused on dispensaries? The pier is a dilapidated mess but the focus is on dispensaries? Enough lazy leadership. At least one council member is already on the take with the cannabis industry (allegedly) while another is far too pro. That suggests this simply won’t stop with 2, despite the will of the voters.
Incentivize tech, entertainment, space and aerospace, tourism, pro sports to move and invest in Redondo Beach as a place for business or a headquarters. Enough with the excuses and lazy governance. The end result of dispensaries will be lower student enrollment, more petty crime, a stench in the city, and premium employers will stay avoiding Redondo, choosing every other South Bay city instead. Just stop.
No dispensaries in Redondo Beach.
Or be happy with even more litigation costs weighing the city down further, among a myriad of newer problems.
Richard Luce
Location:
Submitted At: 11:33am 02-11-25
I do not wish to see cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach.
CA Leon
Location:
Submitted At: 11:23am 02-11-25
I strongly OPPOSE cannabis retail stores in Redondo Beach. The other opposition comments echo my thoughts - please read them again. I am the mother of two amazing young women who grew up in Redondo Beach, attended our amazing schools in Redondo Beach Unified School District and now attend Redondo Union High School. My most important concern is the safety and well-being of my children AND our children. Cannabis retail stores endanger the safety and well-being of ALL OUR children. Please do not allow Redondo Beach to be the only beach city to have cannabis retail stores. VOTE NO on this ordinance.
Nada Bi
Location:
Submitted At: 11:15am 02-11-25
No more smoke shops and certainly no Cannabis on the Artesia Corridor. So many of our middle schoolers walk and ride past these establishments. As a homeowner in North Redondo I oppose any cannabis shops in our area.
Lester Hung
Location:
Submitted At: 10:42am 02-11-25
I strongly oppose opening cannabis stores in Redondo Beach. We have one of the best school districts in the country and it is common sense that every single parent wants their kids stay far away from this.
Kelly Moran
Location:
Submitted At: 10:41am 02-11-25
Oppose
Kathleen Spjute
Location:
Submitted At: 10:27am 02-11-25
I strongly oppose allowing cannabis storefronts in our community. Residents have already shown their strong opposition, and it should be their direction you follow, not outside interests. If the argument is increased money for the city, California has yet to realize the expected tax revenue of legalization. Many of the proposed locations are where RB kids are going to and from school. With more and more research proving the detrimental and irreversible effects of teenage cannabis consumption, does the city really want to look like it’s supporting that? There are plenty of options for those adults who wish to use cannabis without putting stores in the middle of a community.
Rachel Shekar
Location:
Submitted At: 9:38am 02-11-25
I strongly OPPOSE cannabis retail stores in Redondo Beach.
Allowing cannabis storefronts can have detrimental effects on children. They normalize substance use and create opportunities for underage individuals to obtain cannabis.
Additionally, allowing such storefronts could result in greater costs for the city than the revenue generated, given dispensaries’ track records concerning tax debts, unpaid penalties, and lawsuits against municipalities.
I also urge council members with conflicts of interest related to the cannabis industry to recuse themselves from the vote to prevent ethical violations.
Monique Hickmon
Location:
Submitted At: 8:19am 02-11-25
I strongly oppose cannabis retail stores in Redondo Beach. I believe this will bring crime & even violent crime due to break-ins & large amounts of cash on the premises…. strongly oppose! LM Choi
Location:
Submitted At: 8:04am 02-11-25
I strongly OPPOSE this effort to bring cannabis stores to our city. The city council should respect the majority opinion of Redondo Beach RESIDENTS, and not outside business interests of the voters in other parts of the state. There are other methods of acquiring cannabis including going to a store outside of the City. Don’t many of us drive to a Costco or that restaurant outside the City? Or we could even have a delivery model? We all see Amazon trucks making multiple deliveries in our streets each day. If the City Council wants to assert that there is majority support for this in the City; it should put it to a direct vote of the residents. And it should done with options to allow the true sentiment of the residents to be expressed, including wording to show that a delivery model may be an alternative approach.
Wendy Vinzant
Location:
Submitted At: 6:18am 02-11-25
I am District 5 homeowner for 22 years, a parent of a teen who attends Redondo Union High School, an active volunteer in our community, and I am strongly opposed to retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. Redondo Beach residents voted AGAINST retail cannabis in our city in 2022 via Measure E. If you go against the will of the people, Redondo Beach will be the only South Bay city to have retail cannabis. El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach & Palos Verdes have all voted “NO” to retail cannabis. Listen to the peoples voices! Please vote no on this ordinance and move to a delivery-only method like other beach cities.
I am also concerned about retail cannabis dispensaries and safe school routes in district 5 on the Artesia corridor and in District 1 in the Riviera Village. California sells high-potency THC and the data clearly demonstrates that this is dangerous for our youth and their developing brains. Peer-review data suggests that retail cannabis and advertising normalizes cannabis for our youth and I am concerned about the safety of cannabis products and the impact of retail cannabis on our youth. Our school district is one of the best in Los Angeles County, and our youth shouldn’t have to walk by a storefront on their way to elementary, middle or high school. Adults can easily purchase their products in a delivery-only method like other beach cities. Please vote no on this ordinance.
Susan Reuben
Location:
Submitted At: 9:20pm 02-10-25
Well reading the over 40 comments briefly I do believe the city council member Nils Nehrenheim, who is very procannabis, and Joan Irvine with her cannabis-embroidered jeans jacket can take a hike! These two candidates for Mayor are not what our city needs and they will steer us towards nothing good. The very idea of a retail, or for that matter, a delivery-based cannabis dispensary goes against the very nature of our family-centered beautiful community. Redondo Beach is home to some wonderful programs for neurodivergent kids and young adults in Redondo Beach. The Friendship Foundation is working hard to bring these kids opportunities by building the Friendship Campus for training and job development. There are also businesses like Mychal's Cafe on Artesia that employ people on the Spectrum. As a mother of a 13-year-old boy with Autism, I see this ordinance as a slap in the face to me and my brethren. This must not happen! If it does I think we will have to unite and peacefully stage a protest in front of the new businesses. I live close to the "Manhattan Smoke Shop" and let me tell you, it is more of an eyesore than the old beauty college ever was! It is called "Manhattan Smoke Shop" NOT because the owner is fond of NYC, but because he was run out of our sensible neighbor city of Manhattan Beach, California where the property values continue to increase, and the people are smart enough to fight hard to stop seedy businesses like these from ruining their town. Let's be sensible and do the same. NO CANNABIS RETAIL SHOPS, OR DELIVERY ONLY BASED IN REDONDO BEACH. They can just go PUFF-AWAY and take their ugly baby blue billboard with them!
chris Colinsky
Location:
Submitted At: 8:39pm 02-10-25
The residents have said NO to this so many times. How about City Council Members listen to the votes we have already cast. Stop pushing this agenda. We do not want it for our city, our family and especially our YOUTH! Show you care about your position and move on to another way to bring revenue to the city something unhealthy for us! We insist you keep OUR city clean and healthy
Jose Rodriguez
Location:
Submitted At: 8:11pm 02-10-25
As a long time resident of Redondo Beach i am very disappointed that this is even being considered. As a city we ALREADY voted against it. Why is anyone trying to bypass democracy and impose this on us. My kids deserve to grow up in a city free of another vice in there faces. Other beach cities councils had the common sense to strike it down, who in this council is benefiting from this ? Why does this feel so shady ? What promises were made behind closed doors ? The civil litigation onslaught that ensues towards every council person that is even considering this cannot be ignored. As a city we have said no. No means no.
George Adams
Location:
Submitted At: 8:10pm 02-10-25
We do not want WEED stores in REDONDO BEACH! Weed is a gateway drug for the youth and has no place in our town. Anyone who wants weed can go to another town. Why devalue our property values because with weed stores comes crime and vagrancy.
Alexis Sheehy
Location:
Submitted At: 8:05pm 02-10-25
I don’t think cannabis stores are compatible with the ethos of Redondo Beach. I live in District One, and I don’t want one there.
laurie Murphy
Location:
Submitted At: 7:21pm 02-10-25
No to cannabis stores in 90277 90278
Amy Huh
Location:
Submitted At: 6:10pm 02-10-25
I strongly oppose store front cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. It is a health threat for our young people and parents DO NOT WANT IT.
Please consider a delivery only model.
Taylor Coe
Location:
Submitted At: 5:56pm 02-10-25
A cannabis storefront is the last thing NRB needs. Artesia is already plagued with aggressive and often intoxicated drivers. With schools and families in such close proximity, this is a no for me.
Anneke Blair
Location:
Submitted At: 5:31pm 02-10-25
I urge you to prioritize a delivery-focused cannabis access model over brick-and-mortar retail stores in Redondo Beach. I have serious concerns about the potential negative impacts of retail establishments on our community.
Retail storefronts, despite regulations, can inadvertently increase youth access. Their visibility and proximity to neighborhoods pose a risk to our young people. Furthermore, retail locations often contribute to increased foot traffic, parking congestion, and potential loitering, disrupting the character of our neighborhoods. Concentrating these businesses in specific areas can also disproportionately impact certain communities.
A delivery-based system offers a significantly more responsible and beneficial alternative. It provides:
* Enhanced Control: Delivery services allow for stricter age verification and controlled distribution, effectively minimizing underage access. This targeted approach offers far greater oversight than retail storefronts. * Reduced Community Impact: Delivery services avoid the increased traffic, parking issues, and potential loitering associated with retail locations, preserving the tranquility of our neighborhoods. * Support for Local Businesses: A delivery model creates opportunities for local businesses to participate in the regulated cannabis market, fostering economic growth within our community. * Public Health Focus: Delivery services can incorporate educational materials and resources on responsible cannabis use, promoting informed choices and addressing potential public health concerns directly. * Alignment with Community Values: A delivery-focused approach respects the community's desire for controlled access while minimizing the negative impacts of retail storefronts.
A delivery system offers a more responsible and controlled method for providing access to regulated cannabis products. It mitigates the risks associated with retail, prioritizes community well-being, supports local businesses, and promotes a safer, more manageable approach. I urge the City Council to adopt this model.
Agnes Phillip
Location:
Submitted At: 5:06pm 02-10-25
I strongly oppose cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. I do not want Redondo Beach, an award winning school district in Los Angeles to have storefront dispensaries.
James Mueller
Location:
Submitted At: 4:26pm 02-10-25
I oppose cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach, and I oppose allowing private cultivation and processing of the plant. Allowing private cultivation opens the door to illicit dealing and youth consumption as well as no quality control. With a hundred weed factories all over Redondo Beach, law enforcement will be run ragged trying to find all the poor quality weed ending up in the hands of minors, and policing the individuals entering the community for black market weed.
Jennifer Kahn
Location:
Submitted At: 3:20pm 02-10-25
Redondo didn’t vote for this. Parts of the state did. Why must we be forced to do this? I voted against it and I do not want it in Redondo at all. If we are forced to do this, let’s have online only. The parts of the state that voted in favor should have storefronts but it’s not right for every city to be forced to have these storefronts.
Martin Cerri
Location:
Submitted At: 2:59pm 02-10-25
As a long-time resident, homeowner, and father of a teenage boy in District 3, I strongly oppose the opening of cannabis dispensaries in our neighborhood. I'm really worried about how this could negatively affect our community, especially our kids. Research clearly shows the detrimental impact of cannabis use on adolescent brain development, and I don't want to see that risk increased in our community. The potential for increased access and normalization of cannabis use among youth is a real threat to their well-being and future. We need to protect our children.
Rebecca Zino
Location:
Submitted At: 2:56pm 02-10-25
As a resident of district1 in Redondo Beach and a mother of 2 children in the RBUSD school system, I oppose store front cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. Cannabis dispensaries would normalize cannabis use to our city’s youth and with the high potency of cannabis and potential of contaminants in the cannabis supply it is imperative that we protect our kids from its normalization. The other beach cities have voted no to storefront cannabis and I urge Redondo beach to say no as well.
Su Yeang
Location:
Submitted At: 2:45pm 02-10-25
D1 resident home owner and mom of 2 in RBUSD. Sentiment/circumstance has not changed since the citizens of this city voted against storefront cannabis store in 2022. Please respect the wishes of those who voted you in.
GINA RUBOLINO
Location:
Submitted At: 2:37pm 02-10-25
NO RETAIL CANNABIS in REDONDO! NORTH REDONDO didn't want the pallet shelters & now the POT SHOP! STOP trying to ruin North Redondo.We love our SAFE neighborhood.
The safety of our children are at risk.We don't want cannabis use normalized to our youth. We don't want them walking, playing or riding bikes with a cannabis store in our neighborhood.We don't want North Redondo to turn in to a trashy place.Over 75% of residents VOTED "NO" to retail cannabis.If the city council approves this project then they are all going AGAINST the REDONDO BEACH RESIDENTS who said "NO" in the 2022 Measure E vote
El Segundo, Manhattan Beach,Hermosa Beach & Palos Verdes have all voted “NO” to retail cannabis.Listen to the peoples voices!
The claim that storefront dispensaries will eliminate the black market is, FALSE.With California’s extra tax, regular sales tax, and additional local taxes, legal cannabis products will cost about 30% more than black-market alternatives.The store will just make blackmarket purchase more attractive.
1. "Our responsibility to protect and guide our children should take precedence over any potential financial gains.
The experiences of our neighboring cities—El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Palos Verdes Estates—demonstrate that it is possible to refuse such dispensaries and still thrive. We must follow their lead and prioritize the well-being of our youth."
2. "The Department of Cannabis Control has also faced criticism for failing to regulate pesticides, heavy metals, and fentanyl in cannabis products.Given these concerns, including public health risks and the impact on school routes, I question why the City Council is moving forward. The city has already spent over $100K on consultants and solicited advice from potential cannabis operators."
3. "Council members Obagi and Nehrenheim have received financial contributions from cannabis dispensary owners. This creates a risk of litigation if any dispensary that has donated to a council member is awarded a license, as another dispensary could sue for conflict of interest. Given this, both Council members should recuse themselves from all matters related to cannabis."
Adriana Hernandez
Location:
Submitted At: 2:29pm 02-10-25
As a homeowner and mother of a teenage boy in Redondo Beach, I'm deeply concerned about the prospect of cannabis dispensaries opening in our city. I'm opposed to the normalization of cannabis use, especially among our youth. We're incredibly fortunate to have the award-winning Redondo Beach Unified School District, often recognized as one of the best in Los Angeles County. I don't want Redondo Beach to stand out as the only beach city with storefront dispensaries, potentially impacting the well-being and choices of our children.
Janett Barbosa
Location:
Submitted At: 2:05pm 02-10-25
As an individual, a resident of D4, and a parent, I strongly oppose cannabis dispensaries and businesses in our community. In 2022, Redondo Beach residents voted NO on retail cannabis, and our neighboring cities have taken the same stance why should we be the exception? Our children’s health and safety must come first. Highpotency cannabis products pose serious risks, including addiction, cognitive impairment, and mental health challenges for youth. Dispensaries near schools and community spaces would only increase exposure and normalize use. I urge you to respect the will of the community and seek alternative solutions.
Amy Gammill
Location:
Submitted At: 1:57pm 02-10-25
As a Redondo Beach Homeowner, Girl Scout leader, active PTA volunteer, Redondo Beach business leader, and most importantly a parent I STRONGLY oppose Cannabis Sales in the City Limits of Redondo Beach. Redondo residents already voted on not having this in our City recently. Being the only beach City to allow this would bring unwelcome activity to our community.
Laura Bunker
Location:
Submitted At: 1:51pm 02-10-25
As a longtime Redondo Beach resident, homeowner and mom of two in RBUSD schools, I am opposed to cannabis dispensaries in our city. I ask council members to listen to the wishes of Redondo Beach residents, who have overwhelmingly voted against cannabis retail storefronts here. Please consider alternate options such as mail order. Being the only Beach City with retail dispensaries is not a trail RB should blaze.
Rachel Lonsdale
Location:
Submitted At: 1:49pm 02-10-25
I strongly oppose cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. I believe those who need cannabis should get it delivered. Let’s protect our neighborhood and young people.
Elisabeth Diels
Location:
Submitted At: 1:02pm 02-10-25
NO WAY BOTH IN NORTH REDONDO! Do NOT “Todd Lowemstein” North Redondo like you did with the Pallet Shelters! I call / SCREAM BS! Precious South Redondo takes on this mess EQUALLY - or DELIVERY ONLY! I am not anti-cannabis. I am pro-protecting our youth from normalization. Delivery-only allows this as a win-win for all. The state has imposed triple tax on operators, with steadily declining revenues over the last 4 years and $3.1 billion owed in back taxes. Taxes fund Tier 3 drug prevention and addiction support programs.
Tijen Loubert
Location:
Submitted At: 12:57pm 02-10-25
I am a D1 resident, PTA leader, and most importantly, a parent. I am opposed to retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. If approved, Redondo Beach will be the ONLY Beach City to have retail cannabis. El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach and Palos Verdes have all voted “NO” to retail cannabis. If our city council approves this ordinance, it will be AGAINST the will of Redondo Beach residents, 75% of whom voted “NO” to retail cannabis in 2022 via Measure E. I urge this council to consider an alternative method, such as mail-order, to a retail store.
This will bring in revenues while avoiding the normalization of cannabis use to our most impressionable residents, our children. I am not against responsible adult use but strongly oppose exposing our children to it and normalizing usage by placing a store within the very neighborhood streets our children play, ride bikes, and hang out with friends in.
Mariam Butler
Location:
Submitted At: 11:46am 02-10-25
Residents of District 4 and District 5, do not want to see more unwanted businesses, particularly cannabis dispensaries, in our neighborhoods as clearly reflected in the recent community poll conducted by Councilmember Behrendt. The safety of our children is at risk. The introduction of cannabis dispensaries in our area would negatively impact our schools and our youth, who are already at risk from THC-related incidents.
You have a chance to vote down retail cannabis all all our neighboring cities have done. The first ordinance will be voted on tonight, followed by another vote to adopt it 30 days after public comment. One of the topics discussed by planning commission was removing the 1,000-foot rule for dispensaries. The original intent of the ordinance was to place one dispensary in North RB and one in South RB. District 1 has the fewest schools and children.
Eliminating the 1,000-foot rule would allow dispensaries to be placed next to each other in Districts 4 and 5. We do not want this on the Artesia Corridor. This area is home to a large number of families, and it is in close proximity to Adams, Washington, and Madison schools. We have safe school routes, and we do not want our children walking by cannabis dispensaries. While we cannot prevent liquor stores, we do have the ability to prevent cannabis dispensaries. To prioritize the safety and well-being of our children, I urge the council to vote against allowing any cannabis dispensaries in RB. We can boost our sales revenue by focusing on the mall and attracting desirable businesses to our city.
Lastly, I must address a serious conflict of interest. Councilmembers Obagi and Nehrenheim have received financial contributions from cannabis dispensary owners. This creates a risk of litigation if any dispensary that has donated to a councilmember is awarded a license, as another dispensary could sue for conflict of interest. Given this, both Councilmembers should recuse themselves from all matters related to cannabis.
Marie Puterbaugh
Location:
Submitted At: 11:31am 02-10-25
I consider myself agnostic on cannabis dispensaries; I don't oppose them if they are regulated and secure, but I don't advocate for them either. I do think Artesia has a fair share of creepy Vape shops. I realize Paige is leading the way by creating new ordinances to not hand Vape shops retail licenses and making it easier to close down these shops if they have bright lights and window displays and I appreciate fellow council members cooperating with her. Additionally, I have seen on Facebook Doug Boswell, who is on the planning commission, call a resident and "idiot" and have heard he is "rough" with others. In my opinion, I cannot take the planning commission seriously given the low bar to get appointed. Mr. Boswell shows no decorum or respect for others, and has no restraint, and if he is part of this "commission" he, council should ignore any/all recommendations. Dispensaries are causing anxiety for residents,and unfairly dumping them in one area is not fair. I suggest the "slow down" approach, and if you do proceed, put one in the North and one in the south.
Elizabeth Corte
Location:
Submitted At: 10:12am 02-10-25
I am a D4 homeowner and Mother of 3 children in RB schools. I was born and raised in the South Bay with my Father being a business owner here dating back to the 1970s. I strongly oppose the measure allowing storefront cannabis to do business in our community. Redondo Beach would be the only beach city to allow and normalize this activity. Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and Palos Verdes would not permit this in their cities, why would we usher in something that is detrimental to our well being, to our children and our sense of community. We can surely do better than bringing dispensaries to the Beach. yolanda jordan
Location:
Submitted At: 9:20am 02-10-25
Dear Council Members,
I strongly oppose allowing cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach.
First and foremost, I urge you to respect the will of Redondo Beach residents. In October 2022, an overwhelming 75% of voters rejected Measure E, making it clear that our community does not want cannabis retail stores in our city. Ignoring this decision would be a direct dismissal of the people’s voice.
Second, I ask you to prioritize the well-being of our youth. In a world where corporations like Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook, and Juul use targeted algorithms and enticing flavors to capture our children’s attention, you—our city leaders—have a unique opportunity to take a stand. By rejecting dispensaries, you help prevent the normalization of cannabis use among our youth.
Third, the claim that storefront dispensaries will eliminate the black market is, at best, wishful thinking. With California’s excise tax, regular sales tax, and additional local taxes, legal cannabis products will cost about 30% more than black-market alternatives. Rather than eliminating illegal sales, high prices will only fuel the underground market.
Finally, let’s celebrate what makes Redondo Beach special. Our school district was recently named the best in Los Angeles—a remarkable achievement built on the dedication of parents, educators, and strong leadership. As a proud parent, long-time PTA/PTSA member, and active volunteer, I have seen firsthand the effort it takes to create a thriving community for our children. I urge you to join us in protecting that legacy. Be the leaders our youth deserve—stand with us and uphold the values that make Redondo Beach a great place to live and raise a family.
Irene Yamazaki
Location:
Submitted At: 5:55pm 02-09-25
As a parent of 2 students in RBUSD, resident and homeowner in D5; I oppose the opening of store front cannabis dispensaries. I urge council members to RESPECT the wishes of Redondo Beach residents, who voted against cannabis retail stores in our city. 75% of Redondo Beach residents said NO to dispensaries (Measure E).
Theresa Holland
Location:
Submitted At: 3:43pm 02-09-25
Please keep Redondo dispensary free. Residents have plenty of other options for access, and the residential density and number of schools in the city make responsible siting unfeasible. The potential problems and enforcement challenges also far outweigh any perceived benefit to the city with the complicated tax code and logistics.
Winda Mak
Location:
Submitted At: 3:09pm 02-09-25
I am a Redondo Beach resident and a parent of 2 kids in RBUSD. I strongly oppose the opening of storefront cannabis in Redondo Beach due to concerns about the safety, health, and long-term impact on our community.
A few years ago, a cannabis dispensary opened up next to my son's karate dojo. Despite being separated by a wall, the smell of cannabis frequently seeped into the dojo, creating an unhealthy environment for the children.
Our Sensei also felt uncomfortable with the presence of questionable individuals frequenting the dispensary and locked the entrance closest to the dispensary. While we were initially open-minded about the medical necessity of cannabis, we were alarmed by the negative impact a nearby dispensary had on surrounding businesses. The well-being and safety of our children must take precedence over any potential economic benefits these businesses might bring.
Christina Moglia
Location:
Submitted At: 1:08pm 02-09-25
As a resident, parent and homeowner in Redondo Beach I strongly oppose the opening of storefront cannabis in Redondo Beach. I believe it normalizes cannabis to our youth when they will pass these stores on a regular basis. I support a delivery only model that would allow adults to have access to legal cannabis. But it’s not appropriate for our neighborhood. I urge the council to reject these dispensaries Paul Furie
Location:
Submitted At: 11:21am 02-09-25
I am a resident of district 3 and a parent of 2 students in RBUSD. I strongly oppose the opening of storefront cannabis in Redondo Beach. I believe it normalizes cannabis to our youth when they will pass these stores on a regular basis, and it is supported and promoted by their respected city leaders. I support a delivery only model that would allow adults to have access to legal cannabis. I also do not relish the thought of nonresident cannabis users driving on our city streets on a daily basis. To achieve the talked about store revenue of $10 million you would need 830 customers per day if the average customer spends $33 per visit. The damage to the Redondo Beach brand isn't worth the 5 % city take. Finally, just because the city council has spent "hundreds of hours" on the subject does not justify throwing good money after bad. Image what the highly litigious cannabis industry applicants will do when they aren't the chosen 2. Will we pay thousands in legal fees fighting lawsuits, or cave in and open even more stores? Let's get out of this business before we start! Aida Shaw
Location:
Submitted At: 10:30am 02-09-25
Our family has greatly enjoyed living in Redondo Beach for over 40 years. And now the peace and prosperity is threatened by introduction of a highly addictive and destructive substance. It is a lie that it brings revenue without consequences. It destroys lives and families. DO NOT bring these dispensaries to our beautiful city! Nikki Vasquez
Location:
Submitted At: 9:44am 02-09-25
I am a D3 resident and parent and I STRONGLY oppose retail cannabis in redondo beach.
I urge council members to RESPECT the wishes of Redondo Beach residents, who in October 2022 voted against cannabis retail stores in our city. 75% of Redondo Beach residents said NO to dispensaries (Measure E).
Please do the RIGHT thing for our children and our city!! Camvy Tsurui
Location:
Submitted At: 9:34am 02-09-25
I strongly oppose to cannabis dispensaries/retail in Redondo Beach.
I urge council members to RESPECT the wishes of Redondo Beach residents, who in October 2022 voted against cannabis retail stores in our city. 75% of Redondo Beach residents said NO to dispensaries (Measure E).
My family should NOT have to see cannabis activity in our neighborhood. Please do not be the first beach city to allow it in our backyards.
Christina Rizzoni
Location:
Submitted At: 9:24am 02-09-25
I live, work, and raise my children in the South Bay, and I strongly oppose retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. If approved, Redondo Beach would be the only Beach City with retail cannabis, while El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Palos Verdes have all voted “NO.” The 75% of Redondo Beach residents who voted “NO” on Measure E in 2022 should be respected.
Research shows retail cannabis and its advertising normalize use among youth, increasing the likelihood that children as young as 6th grade will try cannabis. The idea that retail cannabis will reduce black-market sales is baseless. California’s high-potency THC is a serious concern for developing brains.
Since the cannabis ordinance process began in 2018, the market has dramatically changed. Declining profits, high taxes, and a $3.1 billion state debt are major issues. The Department of Cannabis Control has also faced criticism for failing to regulate pesticides, heavy metals, and fentanyl in cannabis products.
Given these concerns, including public health risks and the impact on school routes, I question why the City Council is moving forward. The city has already spent over $100K on consultants and solicited advice from potential cannabis operators.
I appreciate the work of our City Council but believe they are on the wrong side of this issue.
Amanda Elias
Location:
Submitted At: 8:54am 02-09-25
As a Redondo Beach resident with two children in the school district, I strongly oppose the adoption of Ordinances 3287-25, 3288-25, and 3289-25, and Resolution CC-2502-004, which would legalize commercial cannabis businesses within our city.
Daniel Nelson
Location:
Submitted At: 10:02pm 02-08-25
I am a resident of D2. I strongly oppose dispensaries in Redondo Beach. This isse has been voted on by the residents only 3 years ago and was disapproved. The city council should respect the wishes of the people who they purpot to represent
Karine Nelson
Location:
Submitted At: 6:22pm 02-08-25
I am a D2 resident and a parent and I strongly oppose establishment of retail cannabis in Redondo Beach.
Melissa Dechandt
Location:
Submitted At: 3:53pm 02-08-25
I am a D1 resident, scientist and parent. I am opposed to retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. If approved, Redondo Beach will be the ONLY Beach City to have retail cannabis. El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach and Palos Verdes have all voted “NO” to retail cannabis. If our city council approves this ordinance, it will be AGAINST the will of Redondo Beach residents, 75% of whom voted “NO” to retail cannabis in 2022 via Measure E.
The peer-review data is clear; retail cannabis and cannabis advertising NORMALIZES cannabis use for our youth and increases the probability of youth trying cannabis as young as the 6th grade and also clearly demonstrates that there is no difference between illegal and legal retail cannabis with regards to youth access and use. The argument that we need this to “stop the black-market cannabis for kids” is baseless. CA grows high-potency THC and its effect on developing youth brains is well-published and deeply concerning.
The city started the process of a cannabis ordinance in 2018; since then, the cannabis market has changed dramatically. Profits continue to decline monthly due to a triple-tax imposed on cannabis operators with $3.1 billion dollars of tax revenue is currently owed to the state, which fund Tier 3 drug prevention and education programs. There is no projected funding to cover the needs of 2025.
The Department of Cannabis Control has been on the cover of the LA times 4 times in the last 8 months due to their complete failure in regulating the pesticide, heavy metals and fentanyl in commercial cannabis supplies and for falsifying testing results of the 66 mandated pesticides tested.. A federal whistleblower case in ongoing.
With razor-thin profit margins, pubic health concerns, the impact on our youth, why is the city council moving forward with this? The city has spent over $100K on two cannabis consultants and subsequently solicited advise on how the city should regulate cannabis from potential cannabis operators.
I appreciate our city council and staff and all the good that they do for our city but I sincerely believe that they are on the wrong side of this issue.
Pastora Cayuri
Location:
Submitted At: 9:42am 02-08-25
As a concerned grandparent, I strongly oppose the establishment of storefront cannabis dispensaries in our city.
The normalization of cannabis use among our youth poses significant risks, fostering an environment where drug use may be perceived as acceptable.
Our responsibility to protect and guide our children should take precedence over any potential financial gains.
The experiences of our neighboring cities—El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Palos Verdes Estates—demonstrate that it is possible to refuse such dispensaries and still thrive. We must follow their lead and prioritize the well-being of our youth. By implementing a delivery-only model, we can prevent the normalization of cannabis use while still generating tax revenues for our city.
I implore the city council to consider the long-term impact on our community and reject the proposal for storefront cannabis dispensaries. Let's work together to ensure that Redondo Beach remains a safe, healthy, and exemplary city for our children and future generations.
Jimena Cabrera
Location:
Submitted At: 9:23am 02-08-25
I am opposed to cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach.
First, I urge council members to RESPECT the wishes of Redondo Beach residents, who in October 2022 voted against cannabis retail stores in our city. 75% of Redondo Beach residents said NO to dispensaries (Measure E).
Second, I urge council members TO DO THE RIGHT THING for our youth. In a world where every single corporation like Instagram, Tik Tok, Snapchat, Facebook, Juul, among others, using algorithms and cotton candy flavors want a piece of our children; you, council members have this opportunity to stand against these predators and do the right thing for our youth and prevent the normalization of cannabis.
Third, the argument of some city council members, that opening store front cannabis is going to eliminate the black market is naïve to say the least. Between California’s excise tax, regular sales tax, and our local tax, customers are going to pay about 30% more on every purchase. I think black markets are going to thrive when the competition costs 30% more.
Finally, recently our school district was named the best school district in Los Angeles. Isn’t that marvelous? As a parent of two children attending the district, a member of the PTA/PTSA since day one and active parent, who proudly says that I have volunteered countless hours. I tell you it takes a village to get that recognition and of course excellent leadership. I urge the council members to join our village, be the leaders our youth deserve and do the right thing.
Agenda Item: eComments for P.1. 25-0203 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE CITY COUNCIL'S POLICY POSITION ON CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL (SB) 71 (WIENER) WHICH SEEKS TO MAKE PERMANENT THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) EXEMPTIONS FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS NOW GRANTED ON A TEMPORARY BASIS UNDER SB 288
DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF A LETTER AND/OR RESOLUTION ARTICULATING THE COUNCIL'S
POSITION ON THE BILL
Overall Sentiment
Brianna Egan
Location:
Submitted At: 7:29pm 02-11-25
I disagree with the city's draft letter in opposition to SB 71 and strongly recommend you not taking a position on this bill. This bill makes permanent SB 288, which passed in 2020, and SB 922, which passed in 2022 to exempt active transportation and public transportation infrastructure projects from CEQA review. This law is common sense: Projects that improve the environment--like active transportation (bike lanes) and public transit which take cars off the road and reduce climate-warming emissions--should not have to undergo onerous, lengthy, and expensive environmental review processes. In these instances, CEQA leads to delay of climate action and adds costs and time to environmentally beneficial projects. According to Streetsblog California, in the 18 months after SB 288 became law, 15 projects statewide used the streamlining (https://cal.streetsblog.org/2022/08/16/on-tothe-governors-desk-s-b-922-to-expedite-sustainable-transportation-projects).
Please note that this law is opt-in only for agencies that choose to invoke SB 288/922 streamlining on projects. In many cases, agencies will still carry out CEQA review on projects that would otherwise qualify for streamlining.
It's also important to note that for the C Line Extension to Torrance, which appears to be the impetus for the city's opposition to this bill, that Metro did not undertake CEQA exemption for this project and proceeded with the CEQA process, including the DEIR that was released in 2023 and the FEIR expected to be released this year.
Your position and the ultimate outcome on this law will have no bearing on this project, and this bill provides enormous benefits to climate action and effective transit and bike lane projects, therefore I strongly discourage you from taking action on this.
Alex Fineman
Location:
Submitted At: 7:16pm 02-11-25
I am a Redondo Beach resident in District 3 and I support SB 71. Contrary to the position taken in Council's letter draft, access to public transportation *improves* quality of life - see the many citations with respect to physical, mental, social, and economic well-being associated with transit ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4988690/ ). Furthermore, the proposed concern for negative impacts on the environment stated in the letter draft is misplaced. In fact, increasing transit access reduces vehicle miles traveled, reducing harmful emissions from car traffic - the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions in the US.
I urge Council to withdraw this letter and to cease its obstructionist tactics. At the very least, Redondo Beach should not be an obstacle to solutions to our state's environmental problems.
Liam Walsh
Location:
Submitted At: 6:55pm 02-11-25
Please support SB 71. I am opposed to the draft letter where the city intends to oppose the bill. We need to more efficiently build key projects such as bike lanes expansion of our bus and rail network. With the C line extension, the project has been in planning for over a decade, and it will be another decade until we can ride it. Regardless of alignment preference, reform is needed at the state level to expedite these key projects. The proposed bill still maintains opportunities for the city and community to weigh in.