eComments CC 2.18.25 — Redondo Beach City Council, February 18, 2025

City Council on 2025-02-18 6:00 PM - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER Meeting Time: 02-18-25 18:00
eComments Report
Meetings Meeting
Time
Agenda
Items
Comments Support Oppose Neutral
City Council on 2025-02-18 6:00 PM -

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
02-18-25
18:00
83 74 7 65 0
Sentiments for All Meetings
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
City Council on 2025-02-18 6:00 PM - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 02-18-25 18:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
F.6. 25-0245 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING
LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive Case Number: 23STCV10146
1 1 0 0
D.1. 25-0220 MAYOR'S PROCLAMATION OF FEBRUARY 2025 AS

BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN REDONDO BEACH
1 1 0 0
H.4. 25-0083 PAYROLL DEMANDS
CHECKS 30113-30128 IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,605.89, PD. 2/14/25 DIRECT DEPOSIT 290810-291433 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,391,687.69, PD. 2/14/25
EFT/ACH $448,436.10, PD. 2/10/25 (PP2502)
EFT/ACH $463,987.07, PD. 2/24/25 (PP2503)

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEMANDS
CHECKS 118041-118261 IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,283,401.40
REPLACEMENT DEMANDS 118039-118040
1 0 1 0
H.14. 25-0229 ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-25 AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6 TO TITLE 6 OF THE

REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE COMMERCIAL
CANNABIS BUSINESSES. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3288-25 AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2 SECTION 10-2.1626

OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES INLAND ZONES OF THE CITY.

FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3289-25 AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 SECTION 10-5.1626

OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW

COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES COASTAL ZONES OF THE
CITY. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
70 5 63 0
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
L.1. 25-0213 PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST

READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE
10, CHAPTERS 2 (ZONING ORDINANCE) AND 5 (COASTAL LAND USE

PLAN IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE) OF THE REDONDO BEACH

MUNICIPAL CODE AND A RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSOCIATED

AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN RELATED

TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNS WITHIN THE HARBOR/PIER

SPECIAL DISTRICT, AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A CLASS 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE

AMENDMENTS
PROCEDURES:

1. Open the public hearing, take testimony and deliberate;

2. Close the public hearing; and

3. Introduce the following ordinance and adopt the following resolution:

INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3291-25, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTERS 2 (ZONING ORDINANCE) AND 5 (COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTING

ORDINANCE) OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGNS. FOR
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING.

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2502-008, A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING CERTIFICATION BY THE

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE

COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE (TITLE
10, CHAPTER 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE), PERTAINING TO

ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGNS, CONSISTENT WITH STATE

LAW, WHICH IS INTENDED TO BE CARRIED OUT IN A MANNER
FULLY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COASTAL ACT; AND PROVIDING

THAT THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S LOCAL COASTAL

PROGRAM WILL TAKE EFFECT AUTOMATICALLY UPON COASTAL

COMMISSION APPROVAL PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES
CODE SECTION 30514 AND TITLE 14, SECTION 13551 OF THE

CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS
1 0 1 0
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for F.6. 25-0245 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Name of case:

New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCV10146
Overall Sentiment
Maureen Conway
Location:

Submitted At: 10:51pm 02-17-25
I support this because all communities deserve safe access.

Agenda Item: eComments for D.1. 25-0220 MAYOR'S PROCLAMATION OF FEBRUARY 2025 AS BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN

REDONDO BEACH
Overall Sentiment
Austin Carmichael
Location:

Submitted At: 8:51am 02-17-25
I applaud this proclamation. It does, however, come across as a platitude. To date, I have seen no African Americans in position of leadership. No Directors of Functional Areas, no Assistant City Manager (thinking in terms of succession planning), no African American representative to City Council from the City Attorney's Office, Police Department, or Fire Department. Not a single African American in the City Clerk's Office. No African Americans in the HR Department. No contracts under $35K awarded to African American businesses or even put out for bid to give an opportunity.

While proclamations may warm the hearts of our current leaders, representation inspires our next generation of leaders.

Agenda Item: eComments for H.4. 25-0083 PAYROLL DEMANDS CHECKS 30113-30128 IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,605.89, PD. 2/14/25 DIRECT DEPOSIT 290810-291433 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,391,687.69, PD. 2/14/25 EFT/ACH $448,436.10, PD. 2/10/25 (PP2502)
EFT/ACH $463,987.07, PD. 2/24/25 (PP2503)

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEMANDS
CHECKS 118041-118261 IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,283,401.40
REPLACEMENT DEMANDS 118039-118040
Overall Sentiment
Rosyclar Riera
Location:

Submitted At: 4:13pm 02-18-25
I already sent my comment and unable to see if was posted. It is the 2nd time I attempted to post my comment today.

Agenda Item: eComments for H.14. 25-0229 ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3287-25 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6 TO TITLE 6 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESSES. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3288-25 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 2 SECTION 10-2.1626 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES INLAND ZONES OF THE CITY. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3289-25 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 SECTION 10-5.1626 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITIES COASTAL ZONES OF THE CITY. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION Overall Sentiment
Kristi Mickler
Location:

Submitted At: 10:35pm 02-18-25
Dear City Council/Mayor,
I strongly oppose allowing retail cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. Our residents have already spoken by voting NO on Measure E, rejecting three dispensaries and legal recreational delivery. Moving forward with similar proposals disregards the will of the community.

1. Ignoring Public Feedback – At the first reading, many residents voiced their concerns, yet it appears their input has been ignored. Officials should respect community opposition rather than pushing an agenda the public has already rejected.

2. Respect the Voters’ Decision – Measure E’s rejection made it clear that residents do not want cannabis businesses in our city. Revisiting this issue undermines their choice.

3. Harmful to Youth – Dispensaries increase cannabis visibility, making it more appealing to minors. Early use harms brain development, academic performance, and increases addiction risk. Our city should focus on protecting young people, not exposing them to more temptation.

4. Public Safety Risks – Cannabis businesses often attract crime, including theft and illicit drug activity. Law enforcement resources are already limited, and dispensaries will only add to the burden.

5. Decline in Community & Property Values – Residents choose Redondo Beach for its safe, family-friendly environment. Dispensaries could bring increased traffic, loitering, and negatively impact property values.

6. Questionable Economic Benefits – While tax revenue is often cited as a benefit, the costs of enforcement, regulation, and public health programs may outweigh any financial gains.

For these reasons, I urge the City Council and Mayor to reject any proposals allowing retail cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. We must prioritize community well-being over short-term financial interests.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Kristi Mickler
Mariko Fair
Location:

Submitted At: 9:19pm 02-18-25
There are over 10,000 school-aged children in Redondo Beach, which is just 6 square miles. We do not want cannabis dispensaries in our neighborhoods, normalizing drug use with our children and teens and providing easier access to drugs.

If there is a need for more revenue, stop blocking the build up of Artesia Blvd. and make it easy for shops and restaurants to thrive in our community! That is what will have a long-term positive impact on our community! Agnes Phillip
Location:

Submitted At: 8:11pm 02-18-25
I strongly oppose any storefront retail cannabis dispensary in Redondo Beach, Susan Reuben
Location:

Submitted At: 6:50pm 02-18-25
Well reading the over 70 comments briefly I do believe the city council member Nils Nehrenheim, who is very procannabis, and Joan Irvine with her cannabis-embroidered jeans jacket can take a hike! These two candidates for Mayor are not what our city needs and they will steer us towards nothing good. The very idea of a retail, or for that matter, a delivery-based cannabis dispensary goes against the very nature of our family-centered beautiful community. Redondo Beach is home to some wonderful programs for neurodivergent kids and young adults in Redondo Beach. The Friendship Foundation is working hard to bring these kids opportunities by building the Friendship Campus for training and job development. There are also businesses like Mychal's Cafe on Artesia that employ people on the Spectrum. As a mother of a 13-year-old boy with Autism, I see this ordinance as a slap in the face to me and my brethren. This must not happen! If it does I think we will have to unite and peacefully stage a protest in front of the new businesses. I live close to the "Manhattan Smoke Shop" and let me tell you, it is more of an eyesore than the old beauty college ever was! It is called "Manhattan Smoke Shop" NOT because the owner is fond of NYC, but because he was run out of our sensible neighbor city of Manhattan Beach, California where the property values continue to increase, and the people are smart enough to fight hard to stop seedy businesses like these from ruining their town. Let's be sensible and do the same. NO CANNABIS RETAIL SHOPS, OR DELIVERY ONLY BASED IN REDONDO BEACH. They can just go PUFF-AWAY and take their ugly baby blue billboard with them!
Michael Lee-Chang
Location:

Submitted At: 6:00pm 02-18-25
As a current student, I want to be clear that my opposition to these dispensaries is not about being anti-cannabis or pro-incarceration. My concern lies with the unchecked greed of the cannabis industry and its failure to implement proper safeguards.

Right now, we’re seeing too many cases of poorly regulated products, mislabeled THC levels, and illegal sales to minors—issues that these ordinances fail to meaningfully address. If we’re expanding commercial cannabis operations in Redondo Beach, we need strict enforcement mechanisms to ensure businesses are actually following the law, not just chasing profits at the community’s expense.

Theresa K.

Location:

Submitted At: 5:59pm 02-18-25
As a parent and an educator, I am STRONGLY opposed to cannabis dispensaries here in Redondo Beach.

Dispensaries are not what we want or need around our children.

Mike Walker
Location:

Submitted At: 5:58pm 02-18-25
The City of Redondo is at a crossroads. I moved to West LA in 1994 and after looking around LA County I decided to buy a townhouse in N. Redondo Beach in 1995. I now live in S. Redondo with my family. I can tell you much has changed since then. We seem to have big city problems now with big city crime almost every day.

Cannabis for sale at retail storefronts will bring more crime. I drove by a store recently and the front door was smashed by opportunists. Why give them this opportunity in our City? Has anyone on City Council asked our School District officials why they host several drug awareness events every year? Our students are influenced by everything they see. A retail cannabis shop at Ave B and PCH near the Wanna Chill shaved ice store that every student from Alta Vista and Parras frequent often. Are you kidding me? Why are we even talking about this!
A store near Ave I and S Catalina? I'm guessing none of the homeowners in that area want to see that store open near them! This is common sense, is it not? We already have Moonstone at Ave A and PCH. RBPD has visited that location numeroius times for residents suspected of crime. So, that area already has challenges. Nil, I challenge you to do everything possible to stop this from happening. You are running for Mayor so shine some light on your concerns and we will notice.

There is no justification for retail store fronts selling cannabis anywhere in Redondo. We have enough problems with alcohol sales to minors. Adult users can have both delivered very easily.

Finally, stroll down the Esplanade from Knob Hill to Ave I on any given day and there will be the smell of burning cannabis. So do we set up foot patrols in these area's? More patrols cost money so any tax revenue from cannabis sales is not an argument.
jessie lee
Location:

Submitted At: 5:45pm 02-18-25
I do not support dispensaries in RB. As a resident of district 4, I would like to see businesses that families can utilize/support, especially since we have so many smoke shops on Artesia already.

Stephanni Bacher
Location:

Submitted At: 5:39pm 02-18-25
I oppose cannabis businesses in Redondo Beach. Thank you Angela Meng
Location:

Submitted At: 5:34pm 02-18-25
With so many young children around this busy street, this is just not a location for a cannabis shop Debra McGregor
Location:

Submitted At: 5:28pm 02-18-25
I am submitting this comment to strongly oppose any storefront retail cannabis dispensary in Redondo Beach, specifically North Redondo. I specifically oppose the 2 locations proposed at Manhattan Beach Blvd and Inglewood in District 5 and the Aviation location in District 4. As a resident in the "TRW Tract" area, we are already concerned about the conditions and safety of the area between the 405 Inglewood offramp and the North/Eastern-most border of Redondo Beach for our kids. We are concerned with the influence on our kids and teens with the presence of dispensaries, the clientele, and risks brought to our families. We saw a very big improvement when the liquor store near Dale Page Park at the corner of Phelan and Robinson went out of business and the family-friendly restaurant and cafe came in. This change improved the safety, cleanliness, and utility of Dale Page Park for families and children. Similarly, we would greatly support family-friendly businesses coming into the vacant spots in the shopping center at the corner of Inglewood and MB Blvd where the 99c store was - Adding a cannabis dispensary will discourage a family-friendly revitalization that is already needed in this area.

Robin Goellner
Location:

Submitted At: 5:13pm 02-18-25
I am opposed to cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach and the normalization of cannabis in our youth. I do not want Redondo Beach with our award winning RBUSD "best school district in Los Angeles" to be the only beach city with storefront dispensaries. I’m a mother of a young teen he doesn’t need to be subjected to this and the dangers it brings to neighborhoods!
AC Co
Location:

Submitted At: 5:07pm 02-18-25
No to cannabis stores in Redondo
James Mueller
Location:

Submitted At: 4:58pm 02-18-25
No cannabis cultivation in Redondo Beach.

Tijen Loubert
Location:

Submitted At: 4:57pm 02-18-25
I strongly oppose an ordinance to allow cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach. We were just recognized as the best school district in Los Angeles and it’s crucial to keep our city as a destination district. A key to that is to ensure our children are not normalized to cannabis by keeping dispensaries out of Redondo Beach.

In 2022, Beach City residents voted “NO” to three storefront cannabis dispensaries and the repeal of their city’s ban on non-medical marijuana businesses on identical ballot measure, despite all voting to legalize cannabis via Proposition 64. Whether it was 3 stores or 2 stores, I don’t think that was the driver of the vote. The driver was that our community overwhelmingly doesn’t want retail stores in their neighborhoods.

At your last council meeting, Council member Obagi noted that his constituents voiced concern about having both stores end up in North Redondo. I would suggest a reflection on why those residents are concerned - if this is such a great revenue stream for the city and has no impact on our kids or the safety of our neighborhood, why wouldn’t they be excited to have both in his district?
The argument that we need to beat illegal dispensaries to the punch and put our own drug stores in so the bad players don’t keep selling theirs just doesn’t hold water.

Please listen to your constituents and do not vote to have Redondo become the only South Bay city that puts the welfare of our kids behind the interests of the cannabis industry. A DECLINING industry at that. Please seek revenues from taxing a delivery system.

With the exception of District 5, it seems like this council has gone so far down the road and are so in the weeds of the minutiae of this process that they have lost sight of the big picture and how circumstances may have changed since the council began investigating this ordinance years ago.

As parent of three students in our district, former PTA President, and resident, I am urging you to do all that can be done to keep our neighborhoods safe and maintain the quality of life that we expect in this beautiful city.

Thank you.

Cee-Cee Murphy
Location:

Submitted At: 4:47pm 02-18-25
I STRONGLY oppose cannabis stores in the City of Redondo. We need to stand unified with the other Beach Cities who are not allowing shops to set up in their cities. There are better ways to bring tax revenue into the city that don’t adversely affect the quality of life. Please stop ruining our city! Anne Greenbaun
Location:

Submitted At: 4:40pm 02-18-25
I strongly oppose cannabis storefronts in Redondo Beach. Residents have made this overwhelming majority opinion known over and over. With delivery models in place, there is no need for storefronts, which normalize cannabis use for underage kids who have the much higher risk of permanent neurological damage.

Lisa Rich
Location:

Submitted At: 4:38pm 02-18-25
As a resident of District one and a mother of two, I strongly oppose allowing cannabis stores to open in Redondo Beach.

Rosyclar Riera
Location:

Submitted At: 4:11pm 02-18-25
I am a resident of D1, grandmother of minor grandchildren and a business owner and strongly oppose to this ordinance. We do not need cannabis near our schools with minors and teen to be exposed to cannabis. The use of any drug by minor sand developing teen is detrimental to their brain growth and I am sure these cannabis businesses will be very aggressive in promoting their business regardless of the age of his customers. Yes, we voted against this in 2022 and you shall respect the majority of your constituents.' vote Please listen. If adults want to use it for medicinal or recreational purposes, be my guest as long as they can order the product and get them delivered to them without any risk to children.

Thanks,
Rosyclar Riera_Schwartz
Live in avenue C
Maricela Guillermo
Location:

Submitted At: 4:08pm 02-18-25
I DO NOT support retail cannabis stores ANYWHERE in our city. We strongly believe that a delivery-only option is more than sufficient and does not normalize its use among our youth. Storefronts elsewhere are ubiquitous enough to allow residents who wish to buy in person to do so with minimal effort. The cities of MB, Torrance, and PVE do not allow retail cannabis stores. Why should Redondo be different, particularly given the current cannabis environment in Calif.?
For those who have stated that “Cannabis is being delivered to Redondo already in an uncontrolled fashion,” are you referring to illegal sales, or do you mean legally operating delivery services? Have you reported it to the Police Dep.?
Allowing storefronts to “regulate legal sales” mistakenly assumes that limiting the number of dispensaries will effectively control the illegal market, particularly among youth. This assumption is flawed for several reasons:

Alcohol as a Precedent – Despite having a well-regulated system with numerous liquor stores, underage drinking and illegal sales (such as unlicensed vendors and social supply) persist. The mere existence of legal outlets does not eliminate illegal activity.

Regulation vs. Restriction – Effective regulation requires strong enforcement measures, compliance oversight, and sufficient legal access (via delivery-only) to reduce demand for illicit products. Simply “allowing and regulating” two cannabis dispensaries do not accomplish this.

Youth Protection is About Policy, Not Just Availability – Protecting youth from cannabis exposure depends more on strict ID checks, marketing restrictions, ENFORCEMEMENT, and education rather than the means one purchases/obtains cannabis (delivery/storefront).

In short, if the goal is truly to regulate the market, protect our youth, and respect the concerns of residents, a more comprehensive strategy that prioritizes enforcement and education is necessary. A delivery-only model effectively achieves this goal without diminishing the quality of life for residents who pay high property taxes and bonds. Please vote NO on the ordinance. Allow delivery-only.

Jose Rodriguez
Location:

Submitted At: 3:55pm 02-18-25
I saw that meeting on zoom and saw that every single council person there was against having more than two in their proper districts. That means that they know that it's not good for the district and they're being very disingenuous. No we didn't approve it no we don't want it no we don't want kids doing drugs what is wrong with having a truck free city. You all will go down in history for this city as making the worst most disastrous policy and I will do everything in my power to get all of you voted out why can't we just have a friend of should there be can be sold in Redondo Beach yes or no we never actually voted on it specifically you tricked us into thinking of voting into it by saying should we tax it should we tax it yes that doesn't mean we approve of it Amy Huh
Location:

Submitted At: 3:34pm 02-18-25
I oppose the opening of retail cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach as a concerned mother and resident.

Please consider a delivery only model.

Brian J.

Location:

Submitted At: 3:10pm 02-18-25
As a resident of Redondo Beach, I strongly support the opening of legal cannabis retail in our community. Legal cannabis businesses promote safety, economic growth, and responsible adult use. Tax revenue from these businesses can be reinvested into our local infrastructure, schools, and public services. It’s been legal in California for nearly a decade and it’s past time that adults in Redondo Beach had the freedom to purchase legal cannabis in their own community from retail establishments that can inform, and educate consumers about the products.

I also urge the council to consider the broader context: alcohol is widely available in our city—sold at grocery stores, gas stations, and restaurants. Despite being far more dangerous, children and teens are casually exposed to it on a daily basis without the same outrage shown for cannabis.

According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, alcohol contributes to approximately 140,000 deaths per year in the United States, making it one of the leading causes of preventable death. Alcohol abuse is linked to liver disease, drunk driving fatalities, and domestic violence. In contrast, cannabis has never caused a fatal overdose and has well-documented therapeutic benefits, including pain relief and anxiety reduction, as well as treatment for veterans with PTSD and cancer patients. It’s also a much healthier way for responsible adults to unwind at their leisure.

Denying legal access to cannabis while alcohol remains easily obtainable is not only inconsistent but perpetuates outdated stigmas. A well-regulated dispensary in Redondo Beach will enhance public health, support local businesses, and create a safer, more informed community.

Let’s move forward with policies based on facts, not fear. Thank you.

Liz Koutures
Location:

Submitted At: 2:50pm 02-18-25
They strongly oppose the sale of cannabis in Redondo Beach.

Martin Cerri
Location:

Submitted At: 2:28pm 02-18-25
As a resident of District 3 and the father of a teenage son, I strongly oppose the opening of cannabis dispensaries in our neighborhood. The increased access and normalization of cannabis pose a direct threat to the health and well-being of our youth. We need to protect our children and prioritize their future by preventing the establishment of these businesses in our community.

Dianne Kelly
Location:

Submitted At: 2:14pm 02-18-25
I am concerned that a dispensary could increase crime, such as theft or illegal drug activity. Also, I am worried that a dispensary nearby could increase exposure to marijuana for minors. Another concern would be that it could affect the character or reputation of our neighborhood and bring down property values. My final concern regard congestion, the dispensary would increase traffic, parking issues, and people lingering around the area.

Janett Barbosa
Location:

Submitted At: 1:07pm 02-18-25
As a resident of D4 and a mother of teens, I oppose this ordinance. Thank you, Scott Behrendt, for doing what is right and listening to your constituents in D5. This ordinance is a direct threat to the well-being of our children.

Allowing cannabis storefronts in Redondo Beach will normalize cannabis use, making it more accessible and visible to minors. Studies show that the closer cannabis stores are to schools, the higher the likelihood that youth will experiment with drugs. We can’t afford to expose our kids to this risk. We voted against storefronts in 2022, so please listen to your constituents. Cannabis storefronts will send the wrong message to young people, making it harder for schools and families to teach them the dangers of drugs. Delivery services already provide adults with safe access to cannabis without putting our children at risk.

Wendy Vinzant
Location:

Submitted At: 12:24pm 02-18-25
As a D5 resident for 22 years, I would like to thank Scott Behrendt for listening to his constituents, but I still strongly oppose cannabis storefronts in ANY part of Redondo Beach. We voted against storefronts in 2022 with Measure E, so why are you still trying to push them through? Please listen to your constituents and move to a delivery-only model like Hermosa Beach.

Kari Chatterji
Location:

Submitted At: 12:12pm 02-18-25
As a long time resident of RB and mother to 3 teens I strongly OPPOSE.

This makes sense for RB and don't we want what is best for our kids and community? Why not a delivery only model?
Like the many smoke shops in the face of our kids why add cannibas shops as well? Please listen to what the residents want and do NOT move forward on this.

Maureen Conway
Location:

Submitted At: 11:50am 02-18-25
I support dispensaries in Redondo Beach. It's no different than having liquor stores. At least children are not able to go into dispensaries
Alisa Beeli
Location:

Submitted At: 10:22am 02-18-25
I strongly oppose retail storefront cannabis anywhere in Redondo Beach. I am very concerned about adverse effects on our community and our children. Please listen to your constituents. The VAST majority of residents do not want this in ANY district of Redondo Beach. Thank you.

Kathleen Spjute
Location:

Submitted At: 9:53am 02-18-25
I strongly oppose cannabis storefronts in Redondo Beach. Residents have made this overwhelming majority opinion known over and over. With delivery models in place, there is no need for storefronts, which normalize cannabis use for underage kids who have the much higher risk of permanent neurological damage. RBUSD is already battling vaping and drug use in schools—why would the city council choose to make those efforts more difficult? There is also a chance that storefronts can transition to “cafes,” where smoking/consumption happens on site. When council seats are up for reelection, this community will remember who did and didn’t listen to their constituents.

Rachel Shekar
Location:

Submitted At: 9:20am 02-18-25
I oppose cannabis storefronts in Redondo Beach. The exposure to our children and propensity for these businesses to cost the city more money than they bring in make are troubling. Delivery services are sufficient. ****Council members having COI with the cannabis industry should recuse themselves from this vote*** Rebecca Zino
Location:

Submitted At: 8:48am 02-18-25
I am a resident of district 1 in Redondo Beach and I oppose cannabis store fronts in our community. As the parent of 2 children who attend Redondo Beach schools I am concerned about the normalization of cannabis to our youth.

I watched the first reading of this ordinance live on you tube last week and was surprised to learn how long the city council has been working on this ordinance. I had thought the issue of store front cannabis sales had been settled when as a community we voted no on measure E and I only learned last fall that the city was pursuing cannabis store fronts. I urge the council not to let the amount of time invested on this ordinance to interfere with listening to what the residents of Redondo Beach want for our community. Thank you.

Amanda Elias
Location:

Submitted At: 7:47am 02-18-25
I strongly oppose the opening of cannabis businesses in Redondo Beach. While legal and regulated, the presence of cannabis storefronts directly contradicts the efforts of our local schools, which work hard to educate students on avoiding drugs and smoking. Increasing the availability of cannabis will make it more challenging to reinforce these important lessons.

Tax revenue is beneficial, but not at the expense of our children’s well-being. Even with regulations, the normalization of cannabis through visible storefronts sends mixed signals to young minds. Delivery services already provide access for adults without exposing our youth to constant reminders of cannabis use.

We must prioritize the values we teach our children and maintain a safe, family-oriented community. I urge the City Council to reject this ordinance and support the educational efforts of our schools in keeping our children drug-free.

Adriana Hernandez
Location:

Submitted At: 4:28am 02-18-25
I strongly oppose the opening of cannabis businesses in Redondo Beach. As a parent of a teenage boy, I do not want our youth exposed to an environment where they are surrounded by drugs. Allowing commercial cannabis activities increases the risk of normalization and accessibility for young people, with long-term negative consequences for our community.

I urge the City Council to prioritize the well-being and safety of our children by rejecting these ordinances.

Redondo Beach should remain a safe, family-friendly community—not one that promotes cannabis expansion.

LM Choi
Location:

Submitted At: 10:50pm 02-17-25
I strongly oppose the ordinance to bring cannabis store fronts to our community. Studies show that the presence of such stores increase youth exposure to use. Here’s a quote from one such study: “ The prevalence of 11th grade students using edibles, dabbing, and smoking cannabis, but not vaping, were significantly associated with having a cannabis retailer within one mile of high school (Table 4, full model results in Supplemental Table 3).

Specifically, the prevalence of using edibles was 45% higher and dabbing and smoking cannabis were 43% higher among students who attended a high school within 1 mile from a cannabis retailer.”. Here’s a link to it:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9189000/. There are many other studies out there with similar findings.

CA Leon
Location:

Submitted At: 10:35pm 02-17-25
I strongly oppose retail cannabis store fronts in Redondo Beach. I am a District 1 resident and the mother of two wonderful young women who grew up in the Redondo Beach School District and who now attend Redondo Union High School. My utmost concern is the health, safety and well-being of my daughters and that of everyone else's children as well. I urge the City Council to show Redondo Beach residents that you care about the health, safety and well-being of ALL our children by voting NO on this ordinance.

Jimena Cabrera
Location:

Submitted At: 10:23pm 02-17-25
I oppose storefront cannabis in Redondo Beach because it normalizes cannabis use for our children. When I voted AGAINST Measure E allowing 3 retail stores, I certainly didn't fathom that I was saying OK to just 2. I'm sure I'm not alone in that perception. Also, I voted for measure CT, which allows for the taxing of cannabis revenue and stipulates the tax rate. That just seemed to be common sense. Measure CT was narrowly defined and it's passage shouldn't be broadly interpreted to mean everyone who voted for it in Redondo Beach wants a retail cannabis store in their neighborhood.

Karine Nelson
Location:

Submitted At: 10:23pm 02-17-25
I strongly oppose retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. Opening legal retail cannabis does not guarantee that illegal cannabis activity will seize to exist within our city limits. It does however guarantee a normalcy and acceptance of a constant cannabis store- front presence within our city. For the sake of our youth and our family-friendly and safe community, I do not want our city to normalize the use of cannabis.

In order for a business to survive, we all know that it must advertise. Certainly, this marketing will reach our community and will therefore also reach the impressionable, young minds.

I understand that some adult residents and especially the senior residents expressed a wish to use cannabis within our city and I respect their choice. They can already have it legally and safely delivered to their homes. We voted for our city to collect tax revenue from the sale of delivered cannabis. The majority of our voters also rejected opening store front cannabis in Redondo Beach.

Currently, our Redondo Beach community enjoys a reputation of being a family friendly city. Let's keep our familyfriendly and safe community and please not replace it with a destination for cannabis tourism.

The voters and city councils of our neighboring beach communities rejected retail cannabis within their city limits.

If Redondo Beach allows store-front cannabis, I am concerned that the tourism we'll attract will have a specific intent of seeking cannabis by the sea. Let's please not encourage this reason to travel to our city and keep our family-friendly destination. I strongly oppose opening retail cannabis within Redondo Beach city limits.

Daniel Nelson
Location:

Submitted At: 10:08pm 02-17-25
Redondo Beach does not need easy access to cannabis near our beaches. There are etny of dispensaries inthe surrounding towns. Having dispensaries near the Strand, Bike path and Kings Harbor will only increase the amount of smoking in these high traffic zones that are frequented by famies Pastora Cayuri
Location:

Submitted At: 8:43pm 02-17-25
I oppose the opening of retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. I have 2 grandchildren attending school here, and I do not appreciate the city council willingly adding more temptations and dangers in their path. No one has explained to me how having hundreds of cannabis customers driving back and forth on our city streets makes our children safer.

Paul Furie
Location:

Submitted At: 8:30pm 02-17-25
I reaffirm my opposition to storefront cannabis in Redondo Beach. I believe the visability of the retail store normalizes cannabis use in our youth. I would prefer the availability of a delivery only model that lets customers purchase their products conveniently. Also, the argument that the store will have a tasteful/discreet veneer on the outside is ridiculous. Aside from the omnipresent smell, any profit maximizing retail cannabis owner can simply post large billboards with bright lights and directions to Redondo Beach just outside of the city limits. It won't slip by unnoticed.

Elma Pulido
Location:

Submitted At: 8:01pm 02-17-25
I am a RBUSD parent, and I am opposed to retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. 75% of residents voted AGAINST retail cannabis in our city in 2022 via Measure E. Please vote NO on this ordinance Zorica Babic
Location:

Submitted At: 7:48pm 02-17-25
I strongly oppose retail cannabis stores in Redondo Beach.

Patricia Chung
Location:

Submitted At: 7:45pm 02-17-25
I am a District 5 member and parent, and I am opposed to retail cannabis in Redondo Beach. 75% of residents voted AGAINST retail cannabis in our city in 2022 via Measure E. Please vote NO on this ordinance.

Aleksandar Babic
Location:

Submitted At: 7:33pm 02-17-25
Just discussing this horrendous proposal makes me question who are the people representing us at the council, as obviously some of them are not interested in the future of our community, and the benefits of our children.

Instead of investing in healthier surrounding that would allow our children to reach their full potential, we have to fight to prevent bringing cancer into our community.

Such a waste of time and resources. And a huge disappointment.

Opposing canabis stores in Redondo Beach is not a question of right or wrong anymore.

It's a question of common decency.

Those who are supporting canabis stores should not have a seat at the table where the future of our children is discussed.

Irene Yamazaki
Location:

Submitted At: 6:27pm 02-17-25
As a parent of two teenage kids I strongly oppose the opening of store front cannabis in Redondo Beach.

Wei-Min Kuo
Location:

Submitted At: 6:18pm 02-17-25
I oppose of commercial cannabis business in Redondo Beach. By allowing such activities, we are putting our community at risk of increases in crime, impacts on public health, and concerns over the well-being of our children. Introducing commercial cannabis businesses may also adversely impact the appeal of Redondo Beach as a family-friendly and safe environment.
yolanda jordan
Location:

Submitted At: 3:43pm 02-17-25
As a resident, I strongly oppose cannabis retail in our community. I urge the City Council to listen to residents and review data showing a 26% rise in youth cannabis use when retail dispensaries open. State reports also show a steady decline in cannabis tax revenue over the past three years.

Additionally, a whistleblower exposed that the CA Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) falsified lab reports, allowing contaminated cannabis—some with heavy metals, pesticides, and even fentanyl—to be sold.

I also urge support for a delivery-only model, as adopted by cities like Hermosa Beach, to prevent youth normalization and increased use. No to retail cannabis dispensaries! Mary Jersin-Shammas
Location:

Submitted At: 3:09pm 02-17-25
I am strongly against retail cannabis dispensaries in the City of Redondo Beach. I am especially opposed to any located in District 1. A pot shop at any of those possible locations in District 1 is completely out of character and inappropriate for the area. Please respect the majority of the constituents that you are supposed to represent, that clearly oppose any retail stores in any part of our city.

Brenda Garcia
Location:

Submitted At: 2:50pm 02-17-25
I oppose any cannabis storefront establishment. Supporting a delivery-only model could address concerns like reducing public visibility, minimizing traffic, and potentially avoiding some of the negative community impacts associated with storefronts. A majority of Redondo residence have voiced their opposition for cannabis store fronts. Please do your best to honor the community’s wishes and keep these stores out of our neighborhoods.

Winda Mak
Location:

Submitted At: 1:31pm 02-17-25
I am reaffirming my stance in opposition to cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach due to serious concerns about public safety, community health, and the long-term impact on our neighborhood. My child and I have personally witnessed the negative effects these businesses can have on their surroundings.

While I initially approached the issue with an open mind, recognizing the medical necessity for some individuals, my experience with a dispensary near my son’s karate dojo in Torrance made it clear that these establishments can disrupt local businesses and pose risks to children. Despite being separated by a wall, the karate dojo was frequently filled with the strong smell of cannabis, creating an unhealthy environment. Additionally, the sensei restricted access to certain doors due to the presence of questionable individuals near the dispensary.

We must prioritize the well-being and safety of our children and community over the financial interests of the cannabis industry. I urge the council to reject any proposals for dispensaries in our city.

Anneke Blair
Location:

Submitted At: 11:00am 02-17-25
Dear Redondo Beach City Council,
I believe a delivery-only cannabis access model is best for Redondo Beach, and I urge you to reject retail stores.

Protecting our community and responsible access are paramount.

Retail cannabis shops, even regulated, present challenges. They can increase minor access. Retail locations often lead to increased traffic, parking problems, and potential loitering, negatively affecting neighborhoods.

A delivery-based system is more responsible and community-focused. It provides:
* Stronger Safeguards: Delivery services enable stricter age verification and controlled distribution, reducing underage access. This targeted method provides greater oversight than retail. * Preserving Neighborhood Character: Delivery services eliminate increased traffic, parking congestion, and potential loitering associated with retail, maintaining our residential areas' peace and character. * Boosting Local Economy: A delivery model creates opportunities for local businesses in the regulated cannabis market, stimulating economic growth.
* Promoting Responsible Use: Delivery services can include educational resources on responsible cannabis use, empowering informed decisions and addressing public health concerns. * Reflecting Community Priorities: A delivery-only approach aligns with the community's desire for controlled access while minimizing retail's negative impacts.

A delivery-only model offers a superior solution, providing convenient, responsible cannabis access, delivered directly. This is attractive to visitors from areas with restricted access, who appreciate delivery service convenience and novelty during their Redondo Beach stay.

Choosing delivery-only is the most responsible way to provide regulated cannabis access. It minimizes retail risks, prioritizes community well-being, supports local businesses, and promotes a safer framework. I strongly encourage the City Council to adopt a delivery-only model for Redondo Beach.

Christina Rizzoni
Location:

Submitted At: 8:40am 02-17-25
I strongly oppose retail cannabis store fronts in Redondo Beach.

Aida Shaw
Location:

Submitted At: 8:32am 02-17-25
We do NOT want a dispensary ANYWHERE in Redondo Beach. It will lower our property value and quality of neighborhood. While a couple of “businesses” increase their revenues, the rest of the residents will suffer the consequences of increased crime. But the worst consequence is the ruined lives of young people. With more availability, promotion and exposure there will be more addiction. We may not be able to stop all use in our city, but we certainly do not want to increase it.

Mariam Butler
Location:

Submitted At: 7:57am 02-17-25
Very special thank you to Councilperson Behrendt for speaking up for the residents to ensure there will be no cannabis dispensaries on Artesia between Inglewood and Aviation to protect our children as they travel across the safe schools route.

I appreciate the councils attempt at creating a strong ordinance so that when the DCC can confirm with confidence that cannabis is safe for distribution AND storefront locations ar e identified far away from schools, parks, and safe school routes, we will be ready to move forward.

The truth is, for now, nobody wants it in their neighborhood. It is not currently safe and it’s not good for our kids.

Our surrounding beach cities neighbors have all said no to retail cannabis shops, and we should too. Please agree to a delivery only method for now.

Once this is done, please work on an ordinance to ensure current smoke shops stop placing drug paraphernalia in the windows, stop marketing drug products outside their storefronts using banners, A-frames and other marketing materials, turn off their obnoxious lights at night and stop selling illegal products or risk complete shut down. Thank you.

Joanna Edwards
Location:

Submitted At: 1:15am 02-17-25
Here we go again. 75% of residents in this city voted against having retail cannabis in our city. Dozens of people have weighed in on this issue in public meetings. Please hear our voice.

As a resident, I too strongly oppose allowing cannabis retail in our community. Delivery is a method that works. In fact, I encourage District 1 counsel member to file a motion that exempts South Redondo from participation in retail cannabis.

Sue Lim
Location:

Submitted At: 10:23pm 02-16-25
As a citizen of north redondo beach, I strongly oppose with having a cannabis businesses or retail store in this area.

Lemahi Joseph
Location:

Submitted At: 8:52pm 02-16-25
As a member of the Redondo Beach community for 46 years, it would be in the best interest of the citizens to have a legal cannabis shop. Much of our community are natives and have plenty of physical and mental illnesses that cannabis would be greatly beneficial for their health. Cannabis is far less dangerous than alcohol and opiates. It is a natural healing property for many people. Please take my words into consideration and pass this Bill to accept cannabis retailers. It would also help bring more financial stability to the beautiful city of Redondo Beach that I love so much and am proud to say I am born and raised in Redondo beach.

Kirk Norenberg
Location:

Submitted At: 8:50pm 02-16-25
I am disappointed that the council is even considering this proposal when Redondo Beach voters clearly expressed their opposition to storefront cannabis shops by a 3:1 margin in the last election. If the councilmembers truly believe that their constituents are wrong about this issue, then it is their duty to explain WHY they should support it. I think the existing delivery options should be sufficient to satisfy the needs of cannabis users. I thank Melissa D for the points that she brings up in her comment. One other risk I haven't seen addressed yet is that those who travel to a storefront to make a purchase will be more likely to use the product in public or while driving (in violation of the law) than those who receive it by delivery to their home. bev morse
Location:

Submitted At: 8:14pm 02-16-25
i seriously support our city permitting the adult enjoyment and convenience of purchasing wine and other alcoholic beverages and medical and recreational marijuana. bev morse, former assoc director of The Wellness Community; Shelter First, South Central & L.A.; Planned Parenthood Family Clinic, Hawthorne; co-founder and president of Congregation Tikvat Jacob, Manhattan Beach; and South Bay ad director, Rep. Jane Harman, and CA Sec’y of State Debra Bowen.

Melissa Scheuerman
Location:

Submitted At: 7:53pm 02-16-25
We have, as a community, voted against this previously. It will be detrimental to our youth. The delivery service amongst various nearby dispensaries is more than sufficient to facilitate the medicinal and recreational needs & desires of those legally inclined to participate in cannabis purchase.

Claudia Angulo
Location:

Submitted At: 5:54pm 02-16-25
As a concerned parent, my family and I strongly oppose allowing marijuana dispensaries in Redondo Beach.

Marijuana is a known gateway drug, and its presence in our community could increase the risk of youth exposure to stronger, more dangerous substances. Additionally, today’s marijuana products can be contaminated with harmful chemicals, posing serious health risks. Redondo Beach is a family-oriented community, and we must prioritize the well-being of our children. While I understand that some individuals use marijuana for medical purposes, they already have access through mail-order services. There is no need to introduce dispensaries that could negatively impact our city’s safe and family-friendly environment.

Nikki Vasquez
Location:

Submitted At: 5:46pm 02-16-25
I am a D3 resident and parent of two young children.

I STRONGLY oppose retail cannabis storefronts in redondo beach.

I urge council members to RESPECT the wishes of Redondo Beach residents.

I do not want Redondo Beach with our award winning "best school district in Los Angeles" to be the only beach city with storefront dispensaries.

If we must do it, then let’s do delivery only like our neighboring cities. Neither HB or MB have storefront shops! Please do the RIGHT thing for our children and our city!! Thank you!
Handy Handoko
Location:

Submitted At: 4:36pm 02-16-25
Need to attract businesses that majority of the population will benefit.

Andrew Chen
Location:

Submitted At: 1:39pm 02-16-25
I strongly oppose the opening of two retail cannabis stores in Redondo beach. We already have a delivery model system available to the people and I believe that is a fair compromise. I’m already tired of seeing smoke vape shops, liquor stores, and massage parlors in our city. If you want to become a city with great schools and a family oriented community, this is a step in the wrong direction. If tax money is our incentive for such businesses, I believe we can bring different commercial businesses that can generate this revenue versus having a retail cannabis store.

Jill Klausen
Location:

Submitted At: 12:31pm 02-16-25
I am strongly in favor of moving forward with the citizen-approved legal cannabis dispensaries in Redondo Beach.

Dispensaries are only accessible by adults presenting real IDs. In all my years of visiting legal dispensaries in Carson, West L.A., San Pedro, and Venice, I have never once seen a person even close to resembling a teenager either in or around them. Ever. Kids will not be paying the high prices for legal cannabis even if the dispensaries are located closer to home. They're getting it illegally from other sellers, not legal dispensaries. And frankly, that's the parents' job of monitoring, not the city's.

Kimberly Brooke
Location:

Submitted At: 12:06pm 02-16-25
Again - NO!
The answer will always be "no".

Melissa Dechandt
Location:

Submitted At: 10:03am 02-16-25
I am once again urging the City Council to listen to their constituents and review current data on the normalization and 26% increase in youth use of cannabis when storefront retail cannabis dispensaries are allowed in cities.

Please review the multitude of information from the state of CA that clearly shows a steady decline in cannabis taxable revenue over the last three years.

Please review the alarming data concerning the whistleblower who came forward and reported that the CA Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) was regularly falsifying laboratory reports and allowing cannabis that was contaminated with heavy metals, pesticide levels far greater than EPA recommendations and other dangerous contaminants, including fentanyl.

Please review that data, from the state of CA, that states that there is $3.1 billion dollars in unpaid tax revenue (the equivalent of three tax years), funds of which support youth drug prevention and education.

I am asking the city to PAUSE all cannabis activities until the DCC confirms the safety of cannabis products released for distribution. To date there has been no comment from this state organization.

I am asking the city to support a DELIVERY-ONLY model as other cities, including Hermosa Beach, have chosen.

This protects our youth from the normalization of cannabis use and subsequent increases in cannabis use per the CA Department of Public Health’s October 2024 “Report and Recommendations of the High Potency Cannabis Think Tank to the State of CA”.

I want to give huge kudos to the District 5 representative who has listened to his residents who loudly said no to retail cannabis and no retail cannabis on the Artesia Corridor. I urge the rest of the city council to do the same. I do not want retail dispensaries in District 1 in the Riviera Village, on PCH, or in District 2 on 190th street or in District 5 on Inglewood and Manhattan Beach Boulevard. Our city deserves better and our residents deserve to be heard.

Agenda Item: eComments for L.1. 25-0213 PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10, CHAPTERS 2 (ZONING ORDINANCE) AND 5 (COASTAL LAND USE PLAN

IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE) OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND A RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSOCIATED

AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN RELATED TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNS WITHIN THE HARBOR/PIER SPECIAL DISTRICT, AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A CLASS 11 CATEGORICAL

EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE AMENDMENTS PROCEDURES:

1. Open the public hearing, take testimony and deliberate;

2. Close the public hearing; and

3. Introduce the following ordinance and adopt the following resolution:

INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3291-25, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTERS 2 (ZONING ORDINANCE) AND 5 (COASTAL LAND USE PLAN

IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE) OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGNS. FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING.

ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2502-008, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO

BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING CERTIFICATION BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE (TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE),

PERTAINING TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGNS, CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW, WHICH IS INTENDED TO BE CARRIED OUT IN A MANNER FULLY IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COASTAL ACT; AND PROVIDING THAT THE AMENDMENTS

TO THE CITY'S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM WILL TAKE EFFECT AUTOMATICALLY UPON COASTAL COMMISSION APPROVAL PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 30514 AND TITLE 14, SECTION 13551 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF

REGULATIONS
Overall Sentiment
Maricela Guillermo
Location:

Submitted At: 4:06pm 02-18-25
I DO NOT support retail cannabis stores ANYWHERE in our city. We strongly believe that a delivery-only option is more than sufficient and does not normalize its use among our youth. Storefronts elsewhere are ubiquitous enough to allow residents who wish to buy in person to do so with minimal effort. The cities of MB, Torrance, and PVE do not allow retail cannabis stores. Why should Redondo be different, particularly given the current cannabis environment in Calif.?
For those who have stated that “Cannabis is being delivered to Redondo already in an uncontrolled fashion,” are you referring to illegal sales, or do you mean legally operating delivery services? Have you reported it to the Police Dep.?
Allowing storefronts to “regulate legal sales” mistakenly assumes that limiting the number of dispensaries will effectively control the illegal market, particularly among youth. This assumption is flawed for several reasons:

Redondo Beach City CouncilFebruary 18, 2025

Redondo Beach City Council
February 18, 2025