Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
Table of Contents
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
BUDGET RESPONSE REPORTS
FY 2024-25 MIDYEAR BUDGET
The following is a list of Budget Response Reports delivered along with the FY 2024-25 Midyear Budget. A glossary with full Department names is at the end of the document. # Dept Question
1. WED
What are the costs associated with adding hardware and banner signs to the street light poles along Artesia Blvd, and what are the costs anticipated to maintain the existing banners along Harbor Drive?
2. PW
What is the estimated cost to repair critical public infrastructure in the waterfront including the beach pedestrian path, the storm drain outfall facilities south of Topaz, and the sea walls in King Harbor?
3. PD
What is the fiscal impact of staffing the current 27 Crossing Guard locations in the City, plus two additional locations at the Greenbelt pedestrian crossing on Artesia and at the intersection of Inglewood and Grant Avenues?
4. PD
What impact has the increase to the parking meter permit fee had on revenue and the number of total sales compared to prior years, and is it possible for the City to offer a prorated permit in addition to the annual permit?
5. PD
What impact did increasing the hourly rate for parking meters and shortening the Holiday Fee Waiver have on revenue for parking meters in the Riviera Village?
6. PW What is the cost to replace the fencing at the Perry Park baseball field and would a replacement project be eligible for Quimby Funds? Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
Table of Contents
# Dept Question
7. PW What is the cost to conduct an in-depth structural analysis of the Pier Parking Structure’s upper deck?
8. PW What are the costs and options to install dedicated bicycle lanes on Palos Verdes Boulevard?
9. PW What is the cost to systematically replace aging street signs and traffic signal poles throughout the City?
10. PW
What are the cost estimates and funding options to identify and perform major reconstruction on non-residential City streets that are currently unfunded though other City programs?
11. CS What is the cost associated with replacing the bronze plaques stolen from Veterans Park with aluminum plaques?
12. CS What is the fiscal impact of waiving fees for the Lanakila Classic event taking place at the Seaside Lagoon on February 22, 2025?
13. FD
What personal protective equipment (PPE) is regularly used by RB firefighters? How is the PPE cleaned and what is the cost to replace the PPE when needed?
14. FSD
/CM
What is the City’s current Transient Occupancy Tax Rate? How does it compare to neighboring cities? How much additional revenue would be generated by increasing the rate? What is the process to do so?
15. CS
How much is the City’s 4th of July Fireworks Celebration event expected to cost in 2025? What options are available to reduce event costs?
16. PW What are the costs and options to paint murals in intersections using the City’s new logo?
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #01
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#01
February 18, 2025
Question:
What are the costs associated with adding hardware and banner signs to the street light poles along Artesia Blvd and what are the costs anticipated to maintain the existing banners along Harbor Drive?
Response:
In 2023, staff prepared Budget Response Report #51 to provide City Council with an estimate to display decorative banner signs on the existing street light poles along Artesia Blvd. The cost was estimated at $43,200 and included the purchase of 53 banners (one for each pole), hardware, and a structural review of the existing light poles to ensure they could accommodate the weight and wind load stress associated with adding the banners.
The estimate did not include installation of the banners or on-going maintenance.
City Council appropriated $43,200 in funding for the banner program in 2023. To date, Public Works staff have purchased the hardware at a cost of $12,200, leaving a balance of $31,000 for execution of the project. The next step is the completion of a structural analysis of the existing light poles to confirm the amount of additional banner weight and wind load that can be accommodated. The structural analysis is anticipated to cost $11,000, leaving $20,000 for banner procurement and installation.
The North Redondo Beach Business Association (NRBBA) has volunteered to assist with the banner program. The NRBBA has designed four sets of banners that would be changed out quarterly. The estimated cost to purchase the four sets of banner signs, install the hardware and initial banners on each of the 53 light poles, perform quarterly replacement of the banners with new content, and provide associated maintenance is $53,000 for the year. This cost would be reduced by roughly $20,300 if only one set of banners is purchased and installed.
As noted above, $20,000 is expected to be available to support these costs. An additional $33,000 of funding would be required to purchase and install four sets of Artesia banners and $12,700 to purchase and install one set. The NRBBA could potentially cover costs associated with maintenance and banner swapping after the first year.
In addition to the banner program along Artesia, the City has an existing banner program along Harbor Drive. There are 23 light poles with two banner signs each for a total of 46 Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #01
banners along Harbor Drive. City staff has identified a need to purchase replacement parts for the current street light pole hardware, at an estimated cost of $15,545. The labor required to cover installation of the replacement parts is estimated to be $15,000. In total, staff estimates an additional appropriation of $30,545 would be needed for maintenance efforts associated with the existing Harbor Drive banner program.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #02
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#02
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the estimated cost to repair critical public infrastructure in the waterfront including the beach pedestrian path, the storm drain outfall facilities south of Topaz, and the sea walls in King Harbor?
Response:
The table below provides order of magnitude estimates for various infrastructure improvements in the waterfront area. In addition to the order of magnitude estimate, the source of each estimate has been identified, along with the year the estimate was created.
Infrastructure Item
Estimated
Cost to
Repair
Year
Cost
Estimate
Created
Cost
Estimate
Source
MARINA/BEACH:
Basin 3 Sea Wall Replacement $12,000,000 2020 Nobel
Consultant
Estimate
King Harbor Sea Level Rise
Adaptation – overall estimate for
perimeter marina basin protection to
address risk for pedestrian sidewalk and
marina access, perimeter inundation
improvements, perimeter dike
construction, seawall construction,
landfill, relocation of utilities, and
mole/building foundation redevelopment
to raise base floor elevations
$291,000,000 2019 Nobel
Consultant
Estimate
Municipal Pier Utilities
Repairs/Upgrades
$100,000 2025 Jilk Heavy
Construction
Estimate
Basin 3 Docks/Gangway Replacement
– new concrete floating docks with
$32,000,000 2023 Moffatt&
Nichol
Estimate
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #02
marine structure construction and
landside utilities
Beach Boardwalk Pedestrian Walking
Path Replacement – the 1000 ft long, 5
ft wide beach pedestrian walkway south
of the Municipal Pier. This walkway is
separated from the beach biking path
and keeps walking and running
pedestrians safe in this very busy
boardwalk area.
$25,000 2025 Contractor
pricing
Mole A Revetment Repair – permitting
with regulatory agencies and follow-up
construction to repair the existing rock
revetment to original design. Damage
due to wave overtopping of adjacent
breakwater.
$500,000 2024 Moffatt &
Nichol & Jilk
Heavy
Construction
STORM DRAIN:
Avenue F Storm Drain Outfall
Replacement – this Storm Drain Ocean
Outfall is a partially exposed 6 x 5 feet
reinforced concrete box located in the
beach sand. The 232 feet linear outfall
was built by the City in the mid
1980’s and approximately 70 feet of the
outfall is exposed at the oceans edge.
It’s designed to convey 360-cfs of storm
water runoff and has significant
structural deficiencies. The existing
structure has exposed opening, rusting
elements and jagged sections of
concrete and steel.
$2,000,000 2019 Los Angeles
County
Public
Works
SANITARY SEWER:
Basin 3 Pump Station Rehabilitation $5,000,000 2025 Staff Estimate
based on
recent
similar
projects
Harbor Drive Pump Station
Rehabilitation
$5,000,000 2025 Staff
Estimate
based on
recent
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #02
similar
projects
Portofino Way & Mole B Conveyance
System & Manhole Lining
$1,000,000 2025 Sancon
Contract
Pricing
It should be noted that there has been a significant increase in construction costs over the past five years, and that many of the estimates identified above will need to be adjusted to account for inflation. The City hopes to receive a climate resiliency grant from the CA Coastal Commission to fund a comprehensive King Harbor vulnerability assessment that will update several of the critical waterfront infrastructure reconstruction estimates and provide various sea level rise adaptation strategies.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #03
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#03
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the fiscal impact of staffing the current 27 Crossing Guard locations in the City, plus two additional locations at the Greenbelt pedestrian crossing on Artesia and at the intersection of Inglewood and Grant Avenues?
Response:
Crossing guards offer a valuable community service by ensuring safety for students who walk to and from various school locations in Redondo Beach each day. The Crossing Guard program is managed by the Special Operations Bureau of the Police Department.
As part of the FY 2024-25 Budget, the City Council approved crossing guard staffing for 27 locations identified as pedestrian crossing areas in close proximity to schools, as noted below. District maps of the locations are included at the end of this BRR. Of the 27 crossing guard locations, 17 are immediately adjacent to a RBUSD school site, and one is adjacent to the St. Lawrence private school. They are italicized below.
LINCOLN
1. Robinson & Vail
2. Rindge & Plant
MADISON
3. Mackay & Nelson
BIRNEY
4. Grant & Green
5. Aviation & Grant
ADAMS/WASHINGTON
6. Felton & Grant
7. Felton & Ripley
8. Lilienthal & Ripley
9. 182nd & Inglewood
10. Lilienthal & Ralston
11. Inglewood & Ralston
TULITA
12. Palos Verdes & Prospect
13. Palos Verdes & Helberta
14. Helberta & Prospect
JEFFERSON
15. Harkness & Morgan
16. Harkness & Carlson
17. Flagler & Morgan
18. Flagler & Havemeyer
BERYL HEIGHTS
19. Beryl & Maria
20. Beryl & Prospect
ALTA VISTA
21. Camino Real & Prospect
22. Knob Hill & Julia
23. Julia & Serpentine
24. Knob Hill & Prospect
PARRAS
25. Emerald & Lucia
26. Vincent & Lucia
ST. LAWRENCE MARTYR
27. Prospect & Ave G
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #03
Crossing Guard Services
Crossing Guards are generally part-time City employees hired through the Police Department. The Police Department also utilizes contract services to bridge gaps in coverage. If neither a regular Crossing Guard nor a contract provider can staff an intersection, personnel from other areas of the Police Department, such as Municipal Services or Code Enforcement, are diverted from their primary assignment to assist with coverage.
Historically, there has been difficulty in hiring, retaining, and consistently filling part-time Crossing Guard positions based on the limited candidate pool. During FY 2022-23, the City Council approved a pay range increase to $20-25/hour for the Crossing Guard positions, with the goal to improve recruitment and move away from the more costly contract services.
Crossing guard staffing is split into morning and afternoon shifts of approximately two hours each, for a total of 4 to 5 hours per day, for the 180 days in each school year. Using an average pay rate of $22/hour, the total rate for a single City-employed Crossing Guard for the entire school year, incorporating FICA and Medicare costs, is approximately $18,000.
Additionally, the Police Department has an annual agreement with All City Management, Inc. (ACM) for contract services to supplement vacant crossing guard positions in order to avoid the Police Department having to reassign other full-time personnel to Crossing Guard coverage. The current ACM contract cost for FY 2024-25 is $36.78/hour. The cost for a single contracted Crossing Guard for the entire school year is approximately $29,792, which is approximately $11K more than a City-employed Crossing Guard.
Current Fiscal Impact of Crossing Guard Services
For FY 2024-25, there was an existing core budget of $212,600 for part-time crossing guard personnel which funds 12 intersections. In addition, the City Council authorized a one-time General Fund appropriation of an additional $340,000 ($205,000 for part-time staffing and $135,000 for contract services) to staff a total of 27 identified intersections.
This brought the overall funding allocation for crossing guards in FY 2024-25 to $552,600.
Core Budget
12 Intersections
DP#44
($205,000 one-time
part-time staffing)
22 Intersections
Add one-time $135,000 to
DP #44 (contract services)
27 Intersections
Total Cost $212,600 $417,600 $552,600
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #03
Addition of Two Intersections
City Councilmembers have identified two new locations in the City that could benefit from additional crossing guards. The two locations identified are Inglewood Ave. at Grant Ave and Artesia Boulevard at the green belt, just west of Felton Lane. These proposed locations are situated on major arterial roadways which are heavily trafficked in both morning and afternoon hours. Adding crossing guards at both locations, in morning and afternoon hours, would further the City’s commitment to public safety.
At this time, the Police Department does not have any part-time Crossing Guards that could staff the additional intersections proposed. The annual contractual cost for ACM to provide one additional crossing guard is approximately $2,500 a month. With approximately five months left in the fiscal year, that amounts to an additional cost of $12,500 for each intersection, for a total fiscal impact of $25,000 in the current Fiscal Year.
Assessments were conducted at both intersections and the following data was collected.
Intersection Assessment
Artesia Blvd. & Bike Path
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 – 7:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
1. Student Bikes (49)
10 were part of large organized group with three
parents chaperoning
7 crossed when their light was red
3 were riding in the same direction as the vehicles
2. Student E-Bikes (27)
11 were part of the organized group with adult
chaperones
5 crossed when their light was red
3. Student Skateboards (1)
4. Student E-Scooters (5)
5. Student Pedestrians (7)
1 crossed when their light was red
6. Parent & Child on Bike (1)
7. Parent & Child on
Ebike
(1)
8. Adult Pedestrians (25)
7 were walking dogs, 5 were jogging
9. Adult Bikes (14)
Predominantly crossing after the school traffic is over
10. No Helmets 1 Adult – however I saw at least several students without their helmets buckled
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #03
12. Adults & Children &
Dog
0 14. Total Persons
Crossing
(130)
Notes:
The first person crossing was a student on a skateboard at 7:00 a.m. Most students crossing were on a bikes/ebikes.
Most of the student traffic came from 7:30 a.m. to 7:55 a.m. Adams Middle School starts at 8:05 a.m. There were several Students on Ebikes/Bikes crossing after 8:05 which appeared to be high school students.
There were three vehicles that did not stop when the lights were flashing, however there were no persons in the crosswalk at the time.
There were no close calls. A Crossing Guard present could have stopped the three cars running the flashing lights and the nine students crossing the street when their light was red. The vehicles and the students that crossed when they should have waited, did so when the traffic was clear.
Intersection Assessment
Inglewood Avenue & Grant Avenue
Thursday, January 23, 2025 – 7:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
1. Student Bikes (2) Both Crossed Grant only
2. Student E-Bikes (7) Six Crossed both Inglewood and Grant
3. Student Skateboards (0)
4. Student E-Scooters (1) Crossed both Inglewood and Grant
5. Student Pedestrians (20) 14 Crossed both Inglewood and Grant 6 crossed Grant only
6. Parent & Child on Bike (3) Consisting of one parent and two children
7. Adult Pedestrians (16) 9 Crossed Both Inglewood and Grant 3 Crossed Inglewood only
4 Crossed Grant only
5 were joggers
3 were walking dogs, one also had a child
8. Adult Bikes (4)
9. Adult EBikes (2) One crossed Inglewood only
One Crossed Grant only
One included above carrying two children
10. No Helmets One – The helmet was on his handlebars
11. Adults & Children &
Dog
One included with “Adult Pedestrians” above
12. Total Persons
Crossing
(55)
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #03
Notes:
The first pedestrian was an adult who crossed at 7:00 a.m. during peak crossing (7:30 to 7:45 a.m.), there were no huge groups crossing at the same time; the largest of the day was six.
Six adults accompanied their children, and most chaperoned children were Elementary students.
This is a busy intersection. Both streets on both sides have arrows for cars to make a left. The people crossing seemed patient and waited until it was their turn to cross. No cars ran a late yellow or red light.
Most persons crossing appeared to be Middle School students on their own. There were a handful of Elementary students crossing. All were accompanied by an adult. A crossing guard could help, but he/she would need to focus on the south side of Grant and the west side of Inglewood, leaving those crossing Inglewood on the east and/or Grant on the north unescorted.
The pedestrian/bicycle traffic died down after 7:45 a.m. There were four high school students commuting through this intersection until 8:15 a.m.
Both intersection assessments were completed by Kirsten Helgeson, Crossing Guard Supervisor.
Traffic Collision Review:
A collision review was conducted at both locations from January 1, 2024 – January 16, 2025.
Artesia and the Bike Way - Two collisions reported
• Vehicle Vs. vehicle traffic collision with no injuries reported and no pedestrians involved.
• Vehicle Vs. Bicyclist collision report. Bicyclist was crossing Artesia Bl. in the Bike way when they were struck by a vehicle. Minor injuries were reported. Vehicle was found at fault for this collision.
Inglewood Av. and Grant Av. - Nine collisions reported
• Seven, non-reportable” collisions occurred at the intersection. Collisions were non injury and did not involve pedestrians.
• Two traffic collision reports were completed. The collisions were non-injury and no pedestrians were involved.
Midyear
FY 2024-25
BRR #04
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#04
February 18, 2025
Question:
What impact has the increase to the parking meter permit fee had on revenue and the number of total sales compared to prior years, and is it possible for the City to offer a prorated permit in addition to the annual permit?
Response:
FY Comparison
The City’s parking meter permit program provides convenience and cost savings to the public by allowing permit holders to park in designated metered parking spaces for a flat annual permit fee. The annual permit runs from November 1st through October 31st of the following year.
As part of the FY 2024-25 budget, which included a comparison of the permit fees from other cities, the cost of the annual meter permit was increased from $110 to $175, and the permit for Riviera Village employees was increased from $60 to $75. Vehicles must abide by posted time limits or other restrictions, even with the permit. Riviera Village employee permits can only be used in designated spaces.
To illustrate the savings, someone parking at a meter two days a week for four hours, at $1.75/hour (increased in FY 2024-25 from $1.50/hour), would pay $728 per year. The $175 annual permit rate saves $553 a year.
For someone that visits on a regular basis, such as five days a week, for four hours each day, the hourly rate would total $1,820 per year. The permit provides $1,645 in savings.
For meters that do not have an hourly limit, the savings would be even more.
An analysis of meter permit sales through mid-year resulted in the following as compared to last fiscal year at the same time:
FY 2023-24
MIDYEAR
FY 2024-25
MIDYEAR
VARIANCE
Permit Sales 1,667 1,539 (-128) 8%
Revenue $183,370 $268,805 $85,435 47%
Midyear
FY 2024-25
BRR #04
In summary, although there has been an 8% decrease in the number of meter permits sold since last year, the overall revenue has increased significantly by almost 50%.
Proration
City Council has requested options for possible cost proration of the annual permit fee.
Currently, the annual permit runs from November 1st through October 31st of the following year for a flat fee of $175, regardless of when the permit is purchased.
The $175 fee equates to $14.58 per month. Options for prorating the fee would include:
• Reducing the fee by $14.58 each month into the year
• Reducing the fee quarterly by $43.75 to $131.25 and so on • Reducing the fee half-way through the year to $87.50
Each of the options above would have an effect on administrative processing. Currently, Parking Enforcement office staff prepare yearly for the initial high volume of sales which occur from October through December, and taper of significantly afterwards.
Implementing a prorated system could divert staff to assisting with permit sales consistently throughout the year, adding to their other required administrative duties.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #05
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#05
February 18, 2025
Question:
What impact did increasing the hourly rate for parking meters and shortening the Holiday Fee Waiver have on revenue for parking meters in the Riviera Village? Response:
Parking Meter Revenue
As part of the FY 2024-25 budget, City Council authorized an increase in the hourly parking meter rate from $1.50 to $1.75 (and up to $2.00/hour in FY 2025-26). An analysis of revenue as compared to the previous fiscal year at this time, is as follows:
FY23-24 MIDYEAR FY24-25 MIDYEAR VARIANCE %
Meter Revenue $1,247,656 $1,521,026 $273,370 22%
Meter and
Meter Permit
Revenue
$1,431,026 $1,789,831 $358,805 25%
Although the hourly rate increased by approximately 17%, the overall revenue to date vs. last year increased by 22%. This may be indicative of a general increase in parking meter usage and more visitors coming to the area, or more turnover of spaces. It can also indicate higher credit card usage, which tends to generate higher payment per use vs. coin payments.
FY 2024-25 Midyear revenue exceeds the budget projection, and staff anticipates an additional $250,000 in revenue by the end of June 2025. This will also result in additional City-incurred credit card transaction fees beyond the adopted expenditure budget. A Mid-Year Decision Package has been prepared, adjusting the revenue estimate upwards, and offsetting a portion of the revenue with a request to increase the Police Department’s expenditure budget to accommodate additional credit card transaction fees.
Riviera Village Holiday Parking Fee Waiver
As part of the FY 2024-25 Budget, City Council reduced the number of weeks the City offered free parking in the Riviera Village during the holidays. The typical three-week free Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #05
parking period in December was reduced to a single week from Christmas Eve through New Year’s Day. The following table shows the December revenue for 2023 vs. 2024, for the 398 parking meters covering the 536 parking spaces in Riviera Village.
December 2023
Revenue
December 2024
Revenue VARIANCE
Riviera Village
Meter Revenue $4,820 $96,230 $91,410
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #06
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#06
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the cost to replace the fencing at the Perry Park baseball field, and would a replacement project be eligible for Quimby Funds?
Response:
A project to replace the ballfield fencing at Perry Park would include the following, as shown on the attached aerial:
Main Diamond (shown in blue):
- 126 feet of 26-foot chain link fence in the infield
- 205 feet of 10-foot fencing down the left and right field lines - 80 feet of 6-foot fencing for dugouts with privacy screens and roof covers - 60 feet of 16-foot netting down the left and right field lines - Five 8-foot gates
Smaller Diamond (shown in orange):
- 110 feet of 6-foot fencing for the dugouts
- 51 feet of 15-foot back stops, with netting
- Two 8-foot gates
Perimeter Fencing (shown in red):
- 895 feet of 6-foot chain link fencing
- Reinstalling 265 feet of existing windscreen
- 16 feet of 8-foot chain link fencing
- Four swinging gates, including one 15-foot-wide double swinging gate Left Field Netting (shown in purple):
- 106 feet of 10-foot chain link fencing
- 106 feet of 26-foot netting
- New horizontal braces
All existing vertical posts would be re-used.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #06
Based on information obtained from a local fencing contractor, the estimated cost to implement the above scope of work would be as follows:
- $190,000 for galvanized steel fencing, including a 15% contingency - $209,000 for green vinyl coated fencing, including a 15% contingency Use of Quimby Funds
The State of California Government Code Section 66477 authorizes a city to require the dedication of land or impose a payment in lieu of dedication (or a combination of both) for park and recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative map or parcel map for residential development. On September 7, 2004, the Redondo Beach City Council adopted an ordinance establishing park subdivision trust dedications and in-lieu fees (Quimby Fees) for new housing units in the City.
Quimby funds may be used to acquire, develop, and rehabilitate parkland and recreational facilities that serve the neighborhood or region impacted by the development.
Replacing the fencing at Perry Park would be an eligible use of Quimby funds, as Perry Park is considered a regional facility that serves all of Redondo Beach.
Attachment
• Map – Perry Park Baseball Field Fence Replacement
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #07
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#07
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the cost to conduct an in-depth structural analysis of the Pier Parking Structure’s upper deck?
Response:
Walker Consultants (Walker) prepared a proposal to conduct a structural engineering review of the City’s South Pier Parking Structure to determine the feasibility of constructing new buildings on top of the existing parking deck. Walker’s proposed cost for the analysis is $151,000.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #07
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #08
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#08
February 18, 2025
Question:
What are the costs and options to install dedicated bicycle lanes on Palos Verdes Boulevard?
Response:
Per City Council direction provided on December 3, 2024, staff investigated the feasibility of installing dedicated bicycle lanes on Palos Verdes Boulevard (PVB) and presented the analysis to the Public Works & Sustainability Commission (PWSC) on January 27, 2025.
The City Council has already approved new Class II bicycle lanes on PVB between S Irena Avenue and the eastern City border with Torrance. This area is currently being striped. Due to roadway width considerations, dedicated bicycle lanes on the remaining portion of PVB within the City are not designed, funded, or slated for construction at this time. Staff investigated the feasibility of removing either a travel lane or the parking lane in each direction on PVB, between Irena and PCH, to provide space for bicycle lanes.
Completion of bike lanes in this half mile corridor would close the gap between the pending bike lanes eastward of S Irena Ave and those west of PCH in the City of Torrance. Because parking utilization on PVB was found to be low, the PWSC unanimously voted to recommend the City Council fund the design and construction of bicycle lanes along this stretch of roadway. This concept does not currently have funding.
Because the project, if desired by City Council, would repurpose underutilized parking lanes, there would be sufficient room to install Class IV protected bicycle lanes, which include vertical barriers to prevent vehicular intrusion. If space is available, staff generally recommends Class IV protected bicycle lanes for the improved safety and comfort that they provide to riders. If the Council would like to move forward with a bike lane project in this area, further study and coordination would be required to determine the barrier type best suited for the conditions. The review would consider a number of factors, including how to accommodate street sweeping.
The cost to design and install protected bicycle lanes can vary, depending on the materials used for protection. Staff estimates that if rigid, prefabricated, barriers were used, these bicycle lanes could be designed and installed for approximately $250,000.
The cost would be $150,000 to $200,000 if more flexible materials are utilized. Flexible materials, however, come with higher ongoing maintenance costs.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #09
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#09
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the cost to systematically replace aging street signs and traffic signal poles throughout the City?
Response:
Street Name Signs:
The City Council adopted a new City logo, which resulted in an update to the design of the City’s street name signs (SNS). The new sign design also included updates to meet contemporary traffic standards, readability requirements, and the use of more modern, lower-cost, and sustainable materials. At this time, the City has installed approximately 100 new SNS, using its existing annual maintenance budget.
Generally, the City’s SNS fall into one of two categories, post-top signs, the most common, and mast arm signs. Mast arm signs have the option to be internally illuminated.
The in-house cost to replace the remaining 2,712 post-top SNS in the City is estimated as follows:
Materials: $428,480 (2,712 signs x $150 per sign + 271 telespar poles x $80 per pole)
Administrative: $179,968 (1/2 labor hours per sign x $128/hour x 2,812) Installation: $1,079,808 (3 labor hours per sign x $128/hour x 2,812) Post-Top Total $1,688,256
Prior to the approval of the new City logo and corresponding street sign design, 100 posttop signs with the former blue background and yellow sunset were installed. The $63,800 to replace those signs is included in the above estimate. In most cases the existing signpost can be reused, but a contingency for replacement poles is also included in the above estimate.
Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs (IISNS):
The estimate to replace City-owned mast-arm IISNS in the City would be as follows:
• 104 new IISNS
• 101 new pole-mounted SNS (non-illuminated)
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #09
Materials & hardware: $260,000 (104 IISNS x $2,500 per sign) $ 30,300 (101 SNS x $300 per sign)
Administrative: $ 13,325 (1/2 labor hours per sign x $130/hour x 205) Installation: $340,000 ($5,000 per intersection x 68 intersections) IISNS Total: $643,625
It should be noted that many of these IISNS will be replaced as part of future traffic signal improvement projects. Locations where it is only feasible to install non-illuminated SNS due to pole structural integrity will be upgraded to IISNS as signals are replaced to the current standard.
Staff also recommends a CIP project to fund the replacement of large quantities of signs, due to staff labor limitations. However, for one-off replacements, of up to 100 signs, staff would be able to incorporate this work into the annual workplan. Staff has not yet sought quotes from outside contractors for mass replacements, due to the need to develop a project description and specification. For an order of magnitude estimate, staff estimates a range of $2,000,000 to $2,500,000 to account for equipment, materials, labor, design/specification development, traffic control, project management, and inspections.
Traffic Signal Poles:
The City has 108 signalized intersections:
• 58 owned/maintained by the City
• 22 shared maintenance with LA County
• 23 “signal-like” flashing red beacons (mostly obsolete and not expected to be replaced when removed)
• 5 shared with other jurisdictions who maintain those signals.
Some traffic signal poles, like those along Grant, have been replaced as part of Measure M-funded projects. The next twenty-four traffic signals due for replacement and funded for design within the City’s CIP include poles along:
• Inglewood Avenue (4)
• Prospect Avenue (12)
• Catalina Avenue (8)
Along with the poles, replacement of traffic signals often includes new signal controllers, new signal heads, modified curb ramps to meet accessibility standards, new wiring and conduits, new detection equipment, signal timing changes, and all other electrical equipment. Each full intersection signal replacement is expected to cost a minimum of $700,000. Design for new signals along Inglewood, Prospect, and Catalina are at least partially funded through the Regional Measure M program. As appropriate, City staff will continue to explore alternative intersection controls (such as roundabouts) as a reduced cost strategy for ongoing future maintenance and in some cases, to enhance safety.
The construction-only cost to replace the above identified 24 City-owned traffic signals is approximately $16,800,000. There are several other traffic signals around the City that Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #09
will be due for replacement/upgrade in the near future. The construction cost to replace those traffic signals will be an additional $20,000,000. Due to the high cost and the availability of funding, staff recommends the City continue to address signal improvements through Measure M, and other transportation restricted funding sources, to the maximum extent possible.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #10
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#10
February 18, 2025
Question:
What are the cost estimates and funding options to identify and perform major reconstruction on non-residential City streets that are currently unfunded though other City programs?
Response:
City staff has identified two non-residential streets, Grant Avenue (Inglewood to Aviation) and Aviation Blvd (Artesia to Harper) that require major reconstruction and have limited access to funding. Both segments of Grant Avenue and Aviation Blvd do not have a bus route, and, therefore, are not eligible for Prop C funding, a source used on many of the City’s non-residential streets. Potential future funding sources would be SB 1/State Gas Tax (~$1.8M annually), local return Measure R (~$1.2M annually), local return Measure M (~$1.3M annually), or Capital Project Funds. However, there are specific ongoing projects, including Residential Rehabilitation and Citywide Striping, that currently rely on a significant portion of the local return funds and SB 1/State Gas Tax funds. Furthermore, there are specific street projects, such as Artesia Blvd. from Harper Ave. to Hawthorne Blvd., Aviation Blvd. from Artesia Blvd to Manhattan Beach Blvd, and Rindge Ln. that are programmed in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and are expected to be funded by local return funds over the next three fiscal years, as they are able to also utilize Prop C Funding to supplement the project budget. These projects, if approved in future CIP budget as currently programmed in the five-year model, will utilize the majority of available local return funds over that timeframe.
Grant Avenue (Inglewood Ave to Aviation Blvd):
Grant Avenue spans 1.25 miles long from Inglewood Avenue on the east and Aviation Blvd. on the west. According to the most recent pavement study, conducted by NCE in 2024, the estimated cost of repaving Grant Avenue is $4,730,000. Additional scope, typically required to address ADA compatibility for curb ramps and signals, is not needed due to completion of the recent traffic signal and bulb-out projects on this street.
Aviation Blvd (Artesia Blvd to Harper Ave):
This segment of Aviation Blvd spans 0.6 miles long from Artesia Blvd to Harper Ave.
According to NCE’s 2024 pavement study, the estimated cost of repaving Aviation Blvd is $3,900,000. This amount includes ADA compliance requirements.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #10
Both of these estimates use FY 2024 dollars and should be escalated for inflation when the time of anticipated construction is known.
Funding Options:
Below are the funding options for these street segments:
1. Prioritize these street segments in the CIP and fund with General Fund/Capital Fund monies if available
2. Prioritize these street segments ahead of others already in the CIP and fund with SB 1/State Gas Tax, local return Measure R, local return Measure M, or Capital Funds (Other identified segments and other maintenance CIPs would have to be put on hold)*
3. Make these segments a priority in the deferred maintenance street CIP and fund them through this project account as discretionary funds become available
4. Add streets to the unfunded CIP list and/or programmed for local return funds and capital funds in the out years of the five-year CIP plan. *It’s important to note that if the City Council were to utilize the entire allocation of SB 1/State Gas Tax, local return Measure R, and local return Measure M, it would delay Residential Rehabilitation by at least two years. This would also remove funding from the Sidewalk Improvement Project that addresses trip hazards, and it would also delay the Citywide Striping program that aims to maintain all striping on a five-year cycle. This is not an exhaustive list of CIPs that would be affected, but the main drivers of funding for these sources in the CIP.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #11
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#11
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the cost associated with replacing bronze plaques stolen from Veterans Park with aluminum plaques?
Response:
In 2024, the City of Redondo Beach experienced the theft of multiple bronze plaques in and around Veteran’s Park. A total of fifteen 16x16-inch bronze plaques, four 8x8-inch bench plaques, and one large 14x64-inch plaque at the Historic Library were stolen.
Below are the estimated costs for replacing these stolen bronze plaques with aluminum alternatives:
Plaque Size Quantity Cost Total
16x16-inch 15 $ 800.00 $ 12,000.00
8x8-inch 4 $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00
14x64-inch 1 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
Subtotal
25% Contingency (Due to Changing
Aluminum Market Conditions)
$ 17,100.00
$ 4,275.00
Total Estimated Cost $ 21,375.00
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #12
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#12
February 18, 2025
Question:
What is the fiscal impact of waiving fees for the Lanakila Classic event taking place at the Seaside Lagoon on February 22, 2025?
Response:
Lanakila Outrigger, a local paddling group, will host its annual Lanakila Classic on February 22, 2025. As part of the event, the group has reserved the Luau Shelter at Seaside Lagoon from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM, with an expected attendance of 250 people.
The total rental cost is $2,710, including a $400 refundable deposit.
Lanakila Outrigger has requested a fee waiver, as a portion of the proceeds from the event will support individuals affected by the recent Los Angeles wildfires. If approved, the net fiscal impact to the City would be $2,310.
It should be noted that many organizations hold events at Seaside Lagoon with the intent of raising funds for charitable purposes. In fact, on March 8, 2025, H2O events is hosting the Holi Festival (Festival of Colors), a Hindu celebration that is expected to attract 1,100 attendees to the Lagoon and also plans to donate funds that are raised to LA fire victims.
The total rental fee for this event is $10,535, including a $1,000 refundable deposit. If a fee waiver were to be granted for this activity, the City’s fiscal impact would be $9,535.
Granting a fee waiver for one fundraising event may set a precedent that creates expectations for others. If the City waives fees for the Lanakila Classic based on its charitable purpose, it may be expected to extend the same consideration to the Holi Festival, and other future event organizers. To ensure fairness and transparency, the City should consider a clear and consistently applied policy to any fee waiver request. idMidyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #13
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#13
February 18, 2025
Question:
What personal protective equipment (PPE) is regularly used by RB firefighters? How is the PPE cleaned and what is the cost to replace the PPE when needed? Response:
Firefighters face numerous environmental hazards, including exposure to toxic substances from smoke and fire. To comply with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1851 standards, fire departments like Redondo Beach utilize industrial strength washing machines known as “extractors.” These machines are specifically designed to clean turnout gear, remove contaminants, and extend the lifespan of protective equipment through high-speed extraction. Studies show that properly programmed extractors, such as the one at Fire Station 2, can eliminate 85-95% of harmful contaminants.
In addition to fire-related toxins, firefighter turnout gear contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—a group of synthetic chemicals used for their waterproofing, oil resistance, and heat-resistant properties. PFAS are embedded in the outer shell and moisture barrier of turnout gear to repel water, oil, and hazardous liquids, helping protect firefighters from steam burns and chemical exposure.
There are PFAS-free options, however, this option presents a significant cost challenge.
A set of PFAS-free turnout gear costs approximately $6,000 and must be replaced every five years, whereas the current standard turnout gear costs $3,800 and lasts ten years.
Since each firefighter requires two sets, the projected cost over five years for PFAS-free gear is $768,000, compared to $486,000 for standard gear over ten years.
Regular cleaning in extractors helps prevent long-term fiber degradation caused by contaminants. Additionally, the Fire Department contracts with a private company for deep cleaning services, when necessary.
The Redondo Beach Fire Department prioritizes firefighter safety and recognizes the risks associated with contaminated gear. As part of Department policy, firefighters are required to wash their gear using an extractor after prolonged exposure to smoke or fire, ensuring both compliance with safety standards and the longevity of their protective equipment.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #14
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#14
February, 2025
Question:
What is the City’s current Transient Occupancy Tax Rate? How does it compare to neighboring cities? How much additional revenue would be generated by increasing the rate? What is the process to do so?
Response:
The City’s current Transient Occupancy Tax, or TOT rate, is 12%. The City last updated this rate from 10% in July 2005.
Transient Occupancy Tax is one of the City’s major tax revenue sources, and increasing the rate is an option to bring in additional General Fund revenue. Unlike other tax sources, which generate revenue largely from Redondo Beach residents and businesses, TOT generates revenue from visitors to the City. Specifically, hotel guests staying for 30 or fewer consecutive days pay Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). The Redondo Beach TOT rate remains among the lowest in the region.
The City could increase the TOT rate to 14% and remain in line with/ on the lower end of the region and of similar coastal cities. Staff estimates the 2% TOT rate increase would generate approximately $2 million per year in additional General Fund revenue.
Increasing the TOT rate would require a ballot measure. As a general purpose revenue, it would require a 50% majority vote to pass. Transient Occupancy Tax increases Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #14
generally have a high rate of passage, as the burden is borne by visitors but revenue generated supports local city services. In the November 2024 election, 23 of 28 proposed TOT measures passed, with one of the failed measures grouped with other tax increases.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #15
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#15
February 18, 2025
Question:
How much is the City’s 4th of July fireworks celebration event expected to cost in 2025? What options are available to reduce event costs?
Response:
Traditionally, the city has held a barge-based firework show from King Harbor with the exception of the 2021 and 2023 fourth of July holidays. In 2021, the City’s fireworks display was discharged from land, resulting in a full-day closure of Seaside Lagoon on the typically busy holiday. This was required in order to adhere to safety protocols outlined in the California Fire Code, which requires a clearance zone of 500 feet in diameter from the launch site as soon as fireworks arrive on site.
More recently, in 2023, the City held a drone light show to replace the originally planned barge-based fireworks show. This change was the result of the establishment of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (Board) newly implemented National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit (Permit) and the additional guidelines that it required. The City’s contracted fireworks vendor, Pyro Spectaculars, subsequently informed the city it would be unable to produce the bargebased fireworks shows consistent with the new Permit guidelines. In response, and in an effort to find an alternate way for the community to celebrate the fourth of July holiday, an approximately 10-minute drone light show was coordinated by Sky Elements. The Permit was successfully obtained for the subsequent 2024 holiday event and the fireworks display resumed for the annual celebration, utilizing the services of Garden State Fireworks (GSF) to produce the show.
In preparation for a potential 2025 event, staff has confirmed that GSF is available and ready to coordinate a fourth of July fireworks display for the City. While the cost for the fireworks display is comparable to 2024 prices, the cost for barge services has significantly increased. The table on the following page shows the comparison of 2024 prices with those received for a potential 2025 event:
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #15
2024 2025
Fireworks Display $65,000 $65,000
Barge/Tug Services $38,171 $126,810
Moorings $4,862 $5,000
NPDES Permitting Assistance $7,500 $3,000
TOTAL $115,533 $199,810
GSF is continuing its search to find alternate providers for marine services but, to date, has been unsuccessful in finding one that is available and certified.
Previously, staff received a quote from Zambelli Fireworks that was comparable to the one received from GSF, but was for a substantially decreased shell count, which impacts the quality of the show. For reference, GSF’s 2024 show had 17,627 shells while Zambelli’s quote included only 1,010 shells. Additionally, staff reached out to Fireworks America to determine their availability, and they were already booked for the busy fourth of July holiday. Staff was impressed and satisfied with the performance of GSF during the 2024 fireworks display and recommends utilizing their services should the City Council approve funding for a 2025 fireworks display.
Considering the high cost of a water-based display, staff has considered additional locations for a fireworks or drone show. Unfortunately, identifying a location that could support a safe launch site for the fireworks, provide ample seating for visitor viewing area(s), and an effective traffic control and mitigation plan to affected roadways, is a challenge. A number of parks and public spaces were considered including Redondo Union High School (RBUSD), Seaside Lagoon, Dominguez Park, Alta Vista Park, and the Redondo Performing Arts Center (RBPAC).
Redondo Union High School
The preferred landside location reviewed by staff is the baseball field at RUHS. This site would provide ample space to safely launch the fireworks as well as provide options for traffic and safety control plans. This location would also provide a viewing area in Sea Hawk Bowl Stadium for the community to safely enjoy the show. Costs are unknown; however, staff anticipates that a number of security and cleaning protocols would be required including debris removal in and around the field and stadium immediately after the event, as well as on the following day. Staff has reached out to RBUSD representatives to determine whether this is an available and viable option and has not received a reply. If this is the preferred location, staff will continue in these efforts.
Area West of Seaside Lagoon
In 2021, the city hosted a fireworks show in the area just west of the Seaside Lagoon.
While the space is fully available for a 2025 display, it would force the closure of the lagoon on a traditionally busy holiday. This would result in a loss of approximately $10,000 in revenue. It would also result in the closure of the California Surf Club, as it lays within the clearance area. Additionally, there would be an added loss of revenue from metered parking spaces that fall within the clearance zone. There would be added Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #15
expenses to secure the zone with temporary fencing, staff resources for post event cleanup, and acquiring the services of Pi Environmental for NPDES Permit reporting requirements due to the proximity with the ocean.
Dominguez Park
Another open area that was reviewed as a potential site is Dominguez Park. While this location would provide enough open space to safely support the clearance zone without impacting roadways, traffic control, parking, and spectator viewing area(s) would be a challenge. Additionally, staff reached out to Southern California Edison (SCE), who the city has a license agreement with for use of the areas under the power lines, to consider whether there would be any concerns related to a potential fireworks display. Following its review, SCE responded that smoke and embers from the fireworks fallout would pose an immediate risk to the Power Transmission equipment in the park. Therefore, it does not approve of this event taking place at this location.
Alta Vista Park
Alta Vista Park was another location considered, but it was determined not to be ideal as a result of parking and traffic issues that would be too difficult to overcome. Due to the nature of the shape and topography of the park, the majority of the site would be designated for the clearance zone, eliminating any viewing areas for spectators.
Additionally, pedestrian and traffic control would be difficult given the residential areas surrounding the park.
RBPAC
The parking lot of the RBPAC was also reviewed. Unfortunately, the parking lot is not large enough to support the required clearance zone without having to overlap with Aviation Boulevard in order to maintain a safe distance from the performing arts center.
This would require full closure of vehicular and pedestrian traffic on this busy roadway and would be very impactful on a traditionally busy holiday, likely causing major traffic delays. Additionally, there would need to be coordination with the City of Manhattan Beach for closure of those sections of the road that are owned by the neighboring city.
Drone Show
In 2023, the city hosted a drone show as an alternative to the traditional fireworks display.
The city utilized the services of Sky Elements, LLC to produce a 9 to 10-minute drone show over the Redondo Beach waterfront. The display consisted of multiple patriotic vignettes, executed by 200 individually lit drones that performed in synch with a patriotic soundtrack. The total cost was $65,000, however, that was a one-time discounted rate.
Current rates range from $60,000 to $87,500 for a 150 to 250 drone show, respectively.
A 200-drone show, similar to 2023, would be $75,000. Sky Elements has confirmed that it would be available to produce a show on the upcoming July 4 holiday.
Sky Elements has an additional option that includes pyrotechnic elements to their shows, launching fireworks directly from the drones. This additional cost ranges from $15,000 to $35,000 for the inclusion of 12 to 100 PyroDrones throughout the synchronized drone light show.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #15
Event Funding
Historically, funding for the City’s 4th of July fireworks/drone show has been supported by the Harbor Enterprise Funds. However, over the past two years, City Council has invested significant enterprise funding into much needed waterfront improvement projects such as harbor dredging, studies for a new boat launch, seismic upgrades to parking structures, and beautification improvements to the International Boardwalk. In addition, while improving, the enterprise funding sources continue to recover from the Covid pandemic. As a result, the enterprise funds do not have available funding to support the 2025 4th of July fireworks show at the waterfront. Therefore, any event would be reliant on the use of General Funds.
Included below is a summary of the estimated costs for four (4) 2025 fourth of July event options:
WATERFRONT OPTIONS
Water-Based Fireworks West of Seaside Lagoon
GSF $65,000 GSF $65,000
Barge/Tug $126,810 Loss of Revenue (lagoon) $10,000
Moorings $5,000 Loss of Revenue (parking) Unknown
NPDES Permit Reporting $3,000 Temporary Fencing $4,000
NPDES Permit Reporting $3,000
TOTAL: $199,810 TOTAL: $60,000 - $95,000 + parking
INLAND OPTIONS
RUHS Drone Show
GSF $65,000 Sky Elements (150-drones) $60,000
Stadium Rental Unknown Sky Elements (200-drones) $75,000 Custodial Unknown Sky Elements (250-drones) $87,500
Security Unknown PyroDrones (optional) $15,000 -
$35,000
Field Porters $45 p/hr. Loss of Revenue (parking) Unknown *NPDES Permit Reporting $3,000
TOTAL: Unknown TOTAL: $60,000 - $98,000 + parking
*Pi Environmental, who would assist with the NPDES Permit requirements, would be required only if the drone launch site was at the waterfront.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #16
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Budget Response Report
#16
February 18, 2025
Question:
What are the costs and options to paint murals in intersections using the City’s new logo? Response:
Per City Council direction at their February 11, 2025 meeting, City staff investigated the options and cost to paint the City’s newly adopted logo within an intersection. Neighboring cities, such as Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach, have painted their city logos in their downtown/pier areas on high-profile intersections. Generally, the placement of such a logo is most appropriate at locations where there are nearby commercial uses and significant pedestrian/bicycle crossing volumes. Otherwise, the logo would not be as visible from the sidewalk and would more likely be covered by moving vehicles.
In Redondo, significant intersections that could be considered for the painting of the Redondo’s City logo include:
• Torrance Blvd & Catalina Ave – 15’ radius,700 square feet (sf) • Catalina Ave & Vista del Mar – 15’ radius, 700 sf
• Artesia Blvd & Rindge Ln – 10’ radius, 315 sf
• Artesia Blvd & North Redondo Beach Bikeway (NRBB) – (4) 5’ radius circles, 315 sf
• Robinson St & Phelan Ln – 5’ radius, 80 sf
Painting the intersections of Torrance/Catalina, Artesia/Rindge, or Artesia/NRBB would require significant traffic control, estimated at $5,000, for the one-day of work required to paint the intersection. Traffic control for the intersections at Catalina/Vista del Mar or Robinson/Phelan could be accommodated using Public Works crews. The expected materials and labor cost to paint a smaller intersection is approximately $5,000. The cost to paint a larger intersection is approximately $10,000. Below are the total costs to paint each intersection, including traffic control and $1,000 in administrative costs. • Torrance/Catalina – $16,000
• Catalina/Vista del Mar – $11,000
• Artesia/Rindge – $11,000
• Artesia/NRBB – $11,000
• Robinson/Phelan – $6,000
Staff would like to note that future CIP projects that affect Torrance/Catalina and Catalina/Vista del Mar would also affect any existing intersection paintings, but those CIP Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
BRR #16
projects could incorporate the City logo in future aesthetic treatments. Staff anticipates this process would need to reoccur every three to five years to maintain a legible logo design.
Midyear
FY 2024 - 2025
Department Glossary
Dept.
Abbreviation Full Name
CCO City Clerk’s Office
CT City Treasurer
CA City Attorney
CM City Manager
IT Information Technology Department
HR Human Resources
FS Financial Services
PD Police Department
FD Fire Department
LIB Library
CS Community Services
CD Community Development
WED Waterfront and Economic Development
PW Public Works