Cities Index.
Attach 5 - RBUSD Comment Letters

Redondo Beach City Council
March 3, 2026

Document
Attach 5 - RBUSD Comment Letters
Meeting
March 3, 2026
Body
Redondo Beach City Council
Pages
3
Original file
1.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on redondo.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Joseph D. Larsen
Direct Dial: (714) 641-3418
E-mail: [email protected]
April 15, 2024
Ru t an & Tu ck er , LL P | 18 57 5 Ja mb or ee Road , 9 th Fl oo r
I r vi ne , CA 92 61 2 | 71 4 - 64 1- 51 00 | Fa x 71 4 - 546 -90 35 Or an ge Coun ty | Pa lo Alto | San Fra nc is co | Sc ot ts da le | www. ru ta n. co m 2284/025437-0001
20470623.1 a04/15/24

VIA E-MAIL AND

FIRST CLASS MAIL
City of Redondo Beach
Community Development Department
415 Diamond Street
Redondo Beach, California 90277
Attn: Sean Scully
Email: [email protected]
Re: Comment on the City of Redondo Beach’s Proposed General Plan Update Dear Mr. Scully:

I am writing on behalf of Redondo Beach Unified School District (“RBUSD”), a public institution dedicated to serving the educational needs of the residents of the City of Redondo Beach (the “City”). RBUSD is concerned about the proposed update to the City’s General Plan (“Updated GP”). Specifically, it would like to address the land use designation for properties owned by RBUSD.

A. ALL RBUSD-OWNED PROPERTIES SHOULD BE DESIGNATED PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL.

Under the current General Plan (“Current GP”), all RBUSD properties are aptly designated as Public/Institutional (P/I), recognizing their role in serving the community’s educational needs.

This designation encompasses lands held by public entities, special districts, and utilities, earmarking them for governmental, educational, and public cultural facilities, as well as supplementary parks and recreational spaces (Current GP, p. 2-88; Updated GP, p. 2-11).

However, in the proposed Updated GP, three RBUSD properties are inexplicably and wrongly designated as Open Space (OS), contrary to their current use and intended purpose.

Specifically, the following properties, owned and operated by RBUSD, are affected:

1. Lincoln Elementary School Fields and Blacktop Area – A space for physical education and student recreation, integral to the school’s program.

2. Alta Vista Elementary School Fields – An outdoor play area that supports RBUSD students’ health and well-being through physical education.

3. The former Franklin School Site – Property that is currently being developed by the Friendship Foundation to provide specialized educational and developmental services, especially for students with special needs, aiming to impart crucial life skills for independence.

City of Redondo Beach
Email: [email protected]
April 15, 2024

Page 2 ends

2284/025437-0001
20470623.1 a04/15/24
Notably, Figure 3.1 in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the proposed Updated General Plan correctly identifies these three properties as public school facilities. The Land Use designation map ought to maintain consistency with Figure 3.1 by designating these sites as Public/Institutional (P/I), which would recognize them as “schools [with] ancillary parks, recreation, and open spaces.” (Updated GP, p. 2-11.)
RBUSD operates under the Education Code and California Regulations, which govern its use of properties for educational purposes. Any City land use designation that potentially impedes RBUSD’s ability to fulfill its educational mission, including the designation of its property as open space (OS), may lead to exemptions from the City’s land use regulations (see Government Code § 53094). This underscores the necessity for the appropriate designation of RBUSD properties as Public/Institutional (P/I). Such a designation is crucial to ensure alignment with their properties’ intended use and to support RBUSD’s educational mission.

RBUSD previously communicated its concerns to the City’s consultant, PlaceWorks, on or about September 29, 2023, in response to a PlaceWorks letter dated September 11, 2024.

Despite this communication, the proposed land use designation map remains unchanged. The land use map must reflect the correct designation of Public/Institutional (P/I) for all RBUSD properties, aligning with their established use and supporting RBUSD’s educational objectives.

RBUSD urges the City to rectify this apparent oversight and ensure that all RBUSD properties – particularly those referenced above – are appropriately designated as Public/Institutional (P/I) in the updated General Plan. Such action will not only support RBUSD’s educational objectives but also maintain consistency with the existing land use definitions and the community’s best interests.

B. ALL PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES SHOULD HAVE A UNIFORM MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO SET AT 1.25.

Additionally, a notable disparity exists in the Updated GP’s Floor Area Ratio (FAR) designation for properties designated as Public/Institutional (P/I). The proposed maximum FAR for properties within the City’s civic center and the City-owned property at the northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Vincent Street is set at 1.25. In contrast, other Public/Institutional (P/I) designated properties, including school sites owned by RBUSD, are allocated a maximum FAR of only 0.75. This discrepancy not only undermines the principle of uniformity in land use planning but also places undue restrictions on RBUSD’s properties which are intended to serve the community’s educational needs.

RBUSD finds it inappropriate for the City to establish a higher FAR for its own civic center properties while imposing lower FAR requirements on other P/I-designated properties. Such inconsistency violates the uniformity requirements of the Planning & Zoning Law (see e.g., Government Code § 65852). Therefore, we urge the City to rectify this inconsistency by ensuring City of Redondo Beach
Email: [email protected]
April 15, 2024

Page 3 ends

2284/025437-0001
20470623.1 a04/15/24
a consistent FAR of 1.25 across all P/I designated properties, including those owned by RBUSD.

Further, adopting a uniform FAR will not only provide consistency but also provide needed flexibility for the development of RBUSD’s educational facilities to address the City’s evolving educational needs.

RBUSD plays a pivotal role in fostering a learning environment for the City’s residents.

Its properties and facilities are intended to meet the evolving needs of its students and the community. A uniform maximum FAR of 1.25 is critical in allowing RBUSD the flexibility to adapt or expand its services in alignment with the community’s educational needs.

C. CONCLUSION.

In conclusion, RBUSD urges the City to revise the proposed Updated GP to accurately reflect the Public/Institutional (P/I) designation for all properties owned by RBUSD – including the three properties referenced above. This designation aligns with the properties’ current use and supports the district’s educational mission. Moreover, RBUSD requests the City to standardize the FAR for all Public/Institutional (P/I) designated properties to 1.25. Applying the FAR uniformly across all such public properties is not only a matter of equitable land use planning but also essential for RBUSD to meet the City’s evolving educational needs.

Thank you for your attention to these important matters.

Very truly yours,

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
Joseph D. Larsen
JDL
cc: Nicole Wesley, Ed.D., Superintendent, RBUSD
([email protected] )
Mike Witzansky, City Manager, City of Redondo Beach
([email protected] )
Michael W. Webb, City Attorney, City of Redondo Beach
([email protected] )
Annette V. Alpern, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent, Administrative Services, RBUSD ([email protected] )
Joseph D. Larsen
Direct Dial: (714) 641-3418
E-mail: [email protected]
July 17, 2024
Ru t an & Tu ck er , LL P | 18 57 5 Ja mb or ee Road , 9 t h Fl oo r
I r vi ne , CA 92 61 2 | 71 4 - 64 1- 51 00 | Fa x 71 4 - 546 -90 35 Or an ge Coun ty | Pa lo Alto | San Fra nc is co | Sc ot ts da le | www. ru ta n. co m 2284/025437-0001
20858245.1 a07/17/24

VIA E-MAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL
Planning Commission
City of Redondo Beach
Attn: Sean Scully
415 Diamond Street
Redondo Beach, California 90277
Email:

[email protected]
[email protected]
Re: Redondo Beach Unified School District Comments on Agenda Item for July 18, 2024 Meeting: Updates to General Plan Elements
Dear Planning Commission:

We are writing to provide comments on the agenda item scheduled for the upcoming meeting on July 18, 2024, titled “Public Hearing to Introduce Updates to the City’s General Plan Land Use, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Elements Recommendation.” I am writing on behalf of Redondo Beach Unified School District (“RBUSD”), a public institution dedicated to serving the educational needs of the residents of the City of Redondo Beach (the “City”). RBUSD is concerned about the proposed update to the City’s General Plan (“Updated GP”). Specifically, it would like to address the land use designation for properties owned by RBUSD.

A. ALL RBUSD-OWNED PROPERTIES SHOULD BE DESIGNATED PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL.

Under the current General Plan (“Current GP”), all RBUSD properties are aptly designated as Public/Institutional (P/I), recognizing their role in serving the community’s educational needs.

This designation encompasses lands held by public entities, special districts, and utilities, earmarking them for governmental, educational, and public cultural facilities, as well as supplementary parks and recreational spaces (Current GP, p. 2-88; Updated GP, p. 2-11).

However, in the proposed Updated GP, three RBUSD properties are inexplicably and wrongly designated as Open Space (OS), contrary to their current use and intended purpose.

Specifically, the following properties, owned and operated by RBUSD, are affected:

1. Lincoln Elementary School Fields and Blacktop Area – A space for physical education and student recreation, integral to the school’s program.

2. Alta Vista Elementary School Fields – An outdoor play area that supports RBUSD students’ health and well-being through physical education.

Planning Commission
July 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

2284/025437-0001
20858245.1 a07/17/24

3. The former Franklin School Site – Property that is currently being developed by the Friendship Foundation to provide specialized educational and developmental services, especially for students with special needs, aiming to impart crucial life skills for independence.

Notably, Figure 3.1 in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the proposed Updated General Plan correctly identifies these three properties as public school facilities. The Land Use designation map ought to maintain consistency with Figure 3.1 by designating these sites as Public/Institutional (P/I), which would recognize them as “schools [with] ancillary parks, recreation, and open spaces.” (Updated GP, p. 2-11.)
RBUSD operates under the Education Code and California Regulations, which govern its use of properties for educational purposes. Any City land use designation that potentially impedes RBUSD’s ability to fulfill its educational mission, including the designation of its property as open space (OS), may lead to exemptions from the City’s land use regulations (see Government Code § 53094). This underscores the necessity for the appropriate designation of RBUSD properties as Public/Institutional (P/I). Such a designation is crucial to ensure alignment with their properties’ intended use and to support RBUSD’s educational mission.

RBUSD previously communicated its concerns to the City’s consultant, PlaceWorks, on or about September 29, 2023, in response to a PlaceWorks letter dated September 11, 2024.

Additionally, RBUSD sent a letter to the Community Development Department on April 15, 2024, as a comment to the proposed General Plan update. Despite these communications, the proposed land use designation map remains unchanged. The land use map must reflect the correct designation of Public/Institutional (P/I) for all RBUSD properties, aligning with their established use and supporting RBUSD’s educational objectives. For your reference, copies of the previous correspondence are enclosed and incorporated herein.

RBUSD urges the City to rectify this apparent oversight and ensure that all RBUSD properties – particularly those referenced above – are appropriately designated as Public/Institutional (P/I) in the updated General Plan. Such action will not only support RBUSD’s educational objectives but also maintain consistency with the existing land use definitions and the community’s best interests.

B. ALL PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES SHOULD HAVE A UNIFORM MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO SET AT 1.25.

Additionally, a notable disparity exists in the Updated GP’s Floor Area Ratio (FAR) designation for properties designated as Public/Institutional (P/I). The proposed maximum FAR for properties within the City’s civic center and the City-owned property at the northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Vincent Street is set at 1.25. In contrast, other Public/Institutional (P/I) designated properties, including school sites owned by RBUSD, are allocated a maximum FAR of Planning Commission
July 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

2284/025437-0001
20858245.1 a07/17/24
only 0.75. This discrepancy not only undermines the principle of uniformity in land use planning but also places undue restrictions on RBUSD’s properties which are intended to serve the community’s educational needs.

RBUSD finds it inappropriate for the City to establish a higher FAR for its own civic center properties while imposing lower FAR requirements on other P/I-designated properties. Such inconsistency violates the uniformity requirements of the Planning & Zoning Law (see e.g., Government Code § 65852). Therefore, we urge the City to rectify this inconsistency by ensuring a consistent FAR of 1.25 across all P/I designated properties, including those owned by RBUSD.

Further, adopting a uniform FAR will not only provide consistency but also provide needed flexibility for the development of RBUSD’s educational facilities to address the City’s evolving educational needs.

RBUSD plays a pivotal role in fostering a learning environment for the City’s residents.

Its properties and facilities are intended to meet the evolving needs of its students and the community. A uniform maximum FAR of 1.25 is critical in allowing RBUSD the flexibility to adapt or expand its services in alignment with the community’s educational needs.

C. CONCLUSION.

In conclusion, RBUSD urges the City to revise the proposed Updated GP to accurately reflect the Public/Institutional (P/I) designation for all properties owned by RBUSD – including the three properties referenced above. This designation aligns with the properties’ current use and supports the district’s educational mission. Moreover, RBUSD requests the City to standardize the FAR for all Public/Institutional (P/I) designated properties to 1.25. Applying the FAR uniformly across all such public properties is not only a matter of equitable land use planning but also essential for RBUSD to meet the City’s evolving educational needs.

Thank you for your attention to these important matters.

Very truly yours,

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
Joseph D. Larsen
JDL
Enclosures
cc: Nicole Wesley, Ed.D., Superintendent, RBUSD ([email protected]) Mike Witzansky, City Manager, City of Redondo Beach ([email protected]) Michael W. Webb, City Attorney, City of Redondo Beach ([email protected]) Annette V. Alpern, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent Admin Srv, RBUSD ([email protected]) Ce.AcEwORKS
September 11, 2023
Fred Naile
Director of Facilities, Maintenance and Operations
Redondo Beach Unified School District
1401 Inglewood Ave.

Redondo Beach, CA 90278
Subject: Request for Service Provider Information for the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Redondo Beach General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update and Local Coastal Program Dear Mr. Fred Naile:

On behalf of the City of Redondo Beach (City), Place Works is preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Redondo Beach General Plan, Zoning Code Update and Local Coastal Program (proposed project). This letter is to request your assistance in updating information regarding existing school-related services in Redondo Beach and assessing potential impacts of the proposed project. Please respond to the enclosed questionnaire, using additional sheets if necessary. Note that your responses will become a part of the administrative record for this project and will be included as an appendix to the Draft EIR.

Project Location
Redondo Beach is in the South Bay region of Los Angeles County. It is bordered to the north by Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Hawthorne, and El Segundo; to the east by Torrance and Lawndale; to the south by the Palos Verde Peninsula; and to the west by the Pacific Ocean. For purposes of the General Plan Update, the project planning area includes the entire geographic area of the City, which has a total land area of approximately 3,970 acres (6.2 square miles). As depicted in Figure 1, ProjectArea, the City is developed with a variety of land uses, such as established residential neighborhoods, commercial corridors, industrial complexes, public facilities, and parks.

Project Description
Redondo Beach General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update and Local Coastal Program A General Plan establishes long-term goals and policies to guide a community in realizing a vision into the future. The State of California requires each city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of a community and provides a list of topics that must be addressed. Local decision makers use the goals and policies of a general plan to make decisions regarding land use, housing, mobility, infrastructure, open spaces, and recreation.

The City has selected the year 2050 as its planning horizon for updating the existing General Plan. The City is updating four of the State-required elements that make up the General Plan: the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety, and Noise elements. Updates to these elements will be accompanied by associated revisions to the City's Zoning Code and Local Coastal Program needed to make consistent and implement the updated goals and policies. In addition, updates to the General Plan Land Use designations will be reviewed pursuant to the City Chart, Article XXVII, Area of Major Changes in Allowable Land Use. The General Plan is the principal policy document for guiding community growth and the provision of public services and is defined by specific community priorities and values that were identified during the public outreach process.

Once adopted, the General Plan provides high-level guidance that sets the goals and priorities for related efforts, including the zoning code, specific plans, subdivision ordinances, and other planning projects. 700 S Flower St, Suite 600 I Los Angeles, California 90017 I 213.623.1443 ext. 2132 I PlaceWorks.com Ce.AcEwORKS
The following elements will be updated as part ofthe Redondo Beach General Plan, Zoning Update and Local Coastal Program Amendment:
» The Land Use Element establishes how land is developed, used, and arranged to ensure compatibility and add value to the community in terms of function, design, and fiscal return. » The Open Space Element coordinates the circulation system with future land use patterns and buildout to satisfy local and subregional mobility needs, as well as access and connectivity between various neighborhoods and districts. This element also defines goals and policies for the provision of public infrastructure to support the uses accommodated by the Land Use Element. » The Conservation Element addresses how resources are managed comprehensively using systems that are environmentally and economically sustainable and meet growth demand in Redondo Beach. » The Safety Element addresses how the City protects life, property, and commerce from impacts associated with human-made and natural hazards, disasters, and other threats to public safety. It also identifies ways the City can establish strategies to adapt to increased hazard risks and strategies to become more resilient.
» The Noise Element provides a basis for comprehensive local programs to control and abate environmental noise and to protect residents from excessive exposure.

The General Plan will also include an Implementation Plan that identifies responsible parties and the actions needed to carry out General Plan policies.

Table 1, Buildout Statistical Summary, provides a statistical summary of the buildout potential associated with the updated Land Use Plan compared to existing conditions. Figure 3, Current Land Use Plan, shows the existing land use plan for the city. Figure 4, Proposed Land Use Plan, shows the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.

Table 1 Buildout Statistical Summary
Number of
Housing Total Nonresidential Employment
Scenario Acres Units Population Square Feet (Number of Jobs) Existing Conditions 3,973 30,4311 70,3112 11,826,2773 28,638 Proposed General Plan (2050) 3,973 35,3871 78,978
2 17,508,2763 36,627
Potential Growth -- 4,956 8,667 5,681,999 7,989
Notes:
1 2.

3. Includes accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and assisted living units.

Includes people living in dwelling units, ADUs, assisted living units, and group quarters.

Includes square-footage of commercial uses with group quarters (such as memory care facilities).

September 11, 2023 I Page 2
@»
Ce.AcEWORKS
Public Agency Approvals
The proposed project will require adoption by the Redondo Beach City Council. The Planning Commission, General Plan Advisory Committee, and other decision-making and advisory bodies will review the proposed project and make recommendations to City Council. Though other agencies may be consulted during the project process, their approval is not required for adoption of the Redondo Beach General Plan, Zoning Code Update and Local Coastal Program Amendment. However, subsequent development under the proposed project may require approval of state or federal responsible or trustee agencies that may rely on the EIR for decisions in their areas of expertise.

Please respond to PlaceWorks no later than Wednesday, October 11, 2023. If you need additional time to respond, please let me know as soon as possible. You can email your responses to me at [email protected]. If you prefer, mail the completed questionnaire to my attention at 700 S. Flower St., Suite 600, Los Angeles, California, 90017. Feel free to contact me at 213.623.1443 ext. 2132 or via the aforementioned email. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request.

Sincerely,

PLACEWORKS
» 9
f
I
Emma Haines
Associate
Enclosures:

Questionnaire
Figure 1: Project Area
Figure 2: Existing Land Uses
Figure 3: Current Land Use Plan Map
Figure 4: Proposed Land Use Plan Map
September 11, 2023 I Page 3
Redondo Beach General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update and Local Coastal Program Amendment
Redondo Beach Unified School District

1. Please provide RBUSD current student generation rates and development impact fees? If possible, please provide the Developer Fee Justification Study for RBUSD? 2345D Devel=er tee 'Tok#Real Svdy 2p2
.lac'el ode Spara}C cover

2. Are there any existing plans to expand school facilities with RBUSD? If so please describe these planned expansions.
£uSSD Vay Ince cs.res cl 4ylte.
eleeher4 lo»l s)es j ht. rel fcS qers
i ole }> acco.le lo\srt po o >'ll l/
8or4len p1r ore+4 /2ly lr
s\recs a9cons ita.d p. pr-"s)-
2ll @s ion«l c#A's n@> rers! T pr-.

3. Is there any existing Safe Routes to School program in place? If yes, please indicate how or where we can obtain a copy.

Page 1 ends

ional comments you wist;h to make regarding the proposed project.

Pe 1of 1
[ rackek op }eEcelclle
q2 Ch4'reposeA lsn Use,Po -lfe
pa>oeChy 6woad b4 1 so\ Michel sol le
3-AeA lilt bee foc Pbli/1kllsa')
a wH_ H vp to .p > 9)r@en {°
prl>lope sPde , Ullo_ tee areas Gvrnh4 ive a pHs/on sg1·, t" lo\ A>hih la toeih4 '= v>-
r covel dihri+ pry frf
2eh e tl ay 'emi «pr> prihe..

Redondo Beach General Plan Update,AZmoennindgmCeonde Update t and Local Coastal Program Redondo Beach Ui ifid S

4. Please provide any additic al /nifiea School District Response Prepared By:
/well- V/kl
wss !pgrno Dlbs hppg@lrlenl
itle
jgedr %cu.h hi#ill.lLDEhrtl_ 1/21/23
Date

Page 2 ends

REDONDO BEACH GENERAL PLAN, ZONING CODE UPDATE AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Figure 1 - Project Area Map
@
City of Redondo Beach
Note: The City boundary extends 3 miles into the Pacific Ocean, which is not shown on this exhibit.

Source: City of Redondo Beach, 2023.
0 4,000
Scale (Miles)
PlaceWorks

REDONDO BEACH GENERAL PLAN, ZONING CODE UPDATE AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Figure 2 - Existing Land Uses
Pacific Ocean
Source: City of Redondo Beach and PlaceWorks, 2023.
•
Existing Land Use
D Single Family Residential
D 2-3 Unit Residential
4+ Unit Residential
a Mixed Use Residential/Com
Commercial
Industrial
Institutional
Parks and Open Space
D Utility and Open Space
)Uity
AN Vacant
0 3,750
Scale (Feet)
PlaceWorks

REDONDO BEACH GENERAL PLAN, ZONING CODE UPDATE AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Figure 3 • Current Land Use Plan
Lawndale
a
Manhattan
Beach
Hawthorne
Hermosa
Beach
Current General Plan Land Use
t) City of Redondo Beach
r R-1 Single Family Res. (8.8 du/acre)
D R-1A Single Family Res. (17.5 du/acre)
ti R-2 Low Density Multi-Family Res. (14.6 du/acre)
tat R-3 Low Density Multi-Family Res. (17.5 du/acre)
-
RMD Medium Density Multi-Family Res. (23.3 du/acre)
-
RH High Density Multi-Family Res. (28 du/acre)
r C-1 Commercial
tr C-2 Commercial
.-
C-3 Commercial
'1",..,,, -
C-4 Commercial
-
C-5 Commercial
Pacific Ocean mm CR Regional Commercial
t CC Coastal Commercial
EE¥
~~
Lu MU-1 Mixed Use
El
- I
MU-2 Mixed Use
E
/. ,~,, -
MU-3 Mixed Use
• rI-1 Industrial
t 1-2 Industrial
-
1-3 Industrial
-
P Public or Institutional
.............,_ I
I _ gees;7=77-=
0 3,750
Scale (Feet)
Source: City of Redondo Beach, 2023.

PlaceWorks

REDONDO BEACH GENERAL PLAN, ZONING CODE UPDATE AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT

CITY OF REDONDO BEACH
Figure 4 - Proposed Land Use Plan
Hawthorne
[@]Rs.Reseal ovetoy Ace
A, North Iech (5b du/ac)
B. King dale (55 du!'ac!
C, South ofIran satCenter (55 du/ac)
D. 190th Stree t (55 du/'sc)
F,South Bay Marketplace (55 du/ac)
f, fedfr (55 du/ac)
Hermosa Beach
€
Artesia Blvd
DN. Neighborhood Commercial
C- Coastal Commercial
-E; Commer cial
C-2. Commercial
C.'3. Commercial
£.-4: Commercial
£-5; Commercial
Commercial
L._i city ot Redondo Beach
Land Use
Single-Family Residential
R- L. Snglo Family Rasidontal 0-8.8 du'ac)
R-IA- Snape FamyResident»al 0-1.5 du/ac)
Multi-Family Residential
R-2. Low Density Multi-Family Residential ((U-14.B6 du/ac) R-3, Lo Oensity Mult-Family Residential (0-17.5 du/ac)
RMO- Med Density Multi-Family Residential 0-233 du/ac)
RH. High Density Multi-Family Residential (0-30 du/ac)
Maed-Use
till wot.wes two
Al wo.west»
wurc. we«usonstces
Industrial
E-1: Industrial
1-2; Industrial
l a.
tit. so.sate
Public/Institutional/Open Space
P, Pu bl:/Institutional
II Public/IUtlity
it os.nos4 on so
-
-
NS
-
-
- Torrance Blvd
r- l [
llt I O b - [_t] Spe;:ial Policy Arm
' [ atone
M• nh,man &ea
1 ".!lll."' Cl~~~~~~~~~~-• I 23)} MAneastiiona BBoouulelevvaa1drd 4} Galleria Distnet
5a) FCH North
5) PCH Central

5.)1ytance Boulevard
7)Rera Village
I
I
@cl
!
-·~ -i'
we "r+
.,- g
s», gig gfG A
EE.. AtAi: ?
4 } £
s i
Aue° 190th St
Ii
ME
r
ti
11 a
rt
Ocean
@
Pacific
Source: City of Redondo Beach and PlaceWorks, 2023.
0 fl«is rc ls Sawe@

4.4 3,750
PlaceWorks

← All documents from this meeting