REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Minutes
Redondo Beach City Council
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Closed Session – Adjourned Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m.
Open Session – Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.
4:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION – ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Redondo Beach City Council was called to order at 4:01 p.m. by Mayor Light in the City Hall Council Chambers, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California.
B. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Waller, Castle, Kaluderovic, Obagi, Behrendt, Mayor Light
Councilmembers Absent: None
Officials Present: Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Joy Ford, City Attorney
Derek Kalish, Assistant City Clerk
C. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS – ADDITIONAL BACK UP MATERIALS - None D. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS AND NONAGENDA ITEMS Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one on Zoom and no eComments.
E. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
E.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
Phillip Mack v. City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1-20, inclusive Case No: 24TRCV03382
E.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND LABOR NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Sec. 54957.6.
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Diane Strickfaden, Director of Human Resources
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS:
Redondo Beach Professional and Supervisory Association
E.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Elizabeth Hause, Waterfront & Community Services Director Katherine Buck, Waterfront & Economic Development Manager PROPERTY:
400 North Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: AIN: 7503-013-901)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:
Redondo Beach Hotel, Sunrise-Harbor, Ltd.
UNDER NEGOTIATION:
Terms
E.4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Elizabeth Hause, Waterfront & Community Services Director Katherine Buck, Waterfront & Economic Development Manager PROPERTY:
206 Fisherman’s Wharf, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: AIN: 7505-002-933)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:
Prospective Tenants
UNDER NEGOTIATION:
Lease Status
E.5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Name of case:
New Commune DTLA, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, et al.
Case Number: B337897
E.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCV10146
E.7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCP02189
E.8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
Yes in My Back Yard, a California nonprofit corporation; SONJA TRAUSS, an individual v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, and DOES 1 through 25 inclusive
Case Number: 23TRCP00325
E.9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
In re 9300 Wilshire LLC Bankruptcy C.D. Cal.
Case Number: 2:23-bk-10918-ER
E.10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
In re 9300 Wilshire, LLC (9300 Wilshire, LLC et al. v. AES-Redondo Beach, LLC) Bankruptcy C.D. Cal.
Case Number: 2:23-ap-01163-ER
Assistant City Clerk Kalish read titles to be discussed in Closed Session.
City Manager Witzansky announced the following would be participating in Closed Session: City Manager Mike Witzansky, City Attorney Joy Ford, Assistant City Attorney Cheryl Park, Outside Legal Counsel Chuck Michel, Outside Legal Counsel Sean Brady, Human Resources Director Diane Strickfaden, Outside Labor Negotiator Laura Kalty, Waterfront and Community Services Director Elizabeth Hause, W.E.D. Manager Katherine Buck, Outside Legal Counsel Jon Welner, Outside Legal Counsel Abby O’Brient, and Outside Legal Counsel Ginetta Giovinco.
Motion by Councilmember Waller, seconded by Councilmember Castle, to recess to Closed Session at 4:05 p.m.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
G. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Mayor Light reconvened to Open Session at 6:01 p.m.
H. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Waller, Castle, Obagi, Behrendt, Mayor Light Councilmembers Absent: Kaluderovic
Officials Present: Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Joy Ford, City Attorney
Derek Kalish, Assistant City Clerk
I. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
City Manager Witzansky stated there were no reportable actions that evening.
J. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING
Motion by Councilmember Castle, seconded by Councilmember Waller, to adjourn to the Regular Meeting at 6:02 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Motion carried 4-0-1 by voice vote. Councilmember Kaluderovic was absent. 6:00 PM – OPEN SESSION – REGULAR MEETING
A. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Redondo Beach City Council was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Mayor Light in the City Hall Council Chambers, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California.
B. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Waller, Castle, Obagi, Behrendt, Mayor Light, Kaluderovic (arrived at 6:02 after roll call)
Councilmembers Absent: None
Officials Present: Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Joy Ford, City Attorney
Derek Kalish, Assistant City Clerk
C. SALUTE TO THE FLAG AND INVOCATION
Mayor Light invited veterans and active-duty military to stand and be recognized for their service.
Taryn, 7th grader at Parras Middle School, led in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Light asked all to remain standing for a moment of silent invocation.
D. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/AB 1234 TRAVEL D.1. MAYOR’S PROCLAMATION OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 TO OCTOBER 15, 2026
AS HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH
Mayor Light proclaimed September 15th through October 15th Hispanic Heritage Month in Redondo Beach; announced that the City had invited the Cervantes Club from RUHS and called up Sarah Gonzalez, the Cervantes group advisor and RUHS Spanish teacher, and the Cervantes Club Cabinet Members to the podium; recognized the contributions of the Hispanic and Latino community; reported that it is estimated that 15% of the residents in the City are Hispanic or Latino according to the U.S. census; noted that the Cervantes Chapter at RUHS is part of the Spanish National Honor Society and congratulated them; presented the Club with a proclamation for Hispanic Heritage Month.
Sarah Gonzalez thanked the Mayor and Council for having them; introduced the seven
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
members of her Cabinet.
Sofia Perez, Cabinet member, expressed her honor in having the Club be recognized that evening; spoke about the meaning of Hispanic Heritage Month and welcomed the opportunity to be able to express their culture and their community.
Mayor Light continued with AB1234 Travel Expense Reports; reported attending the Southern California Association of Governments RHNA Subcommittee; stated that the news was not good, they can expect a big RHNA number for the year, but they are starting early and the City does not have to have their Housing Element complete until April 2030; reported attending the 9/11 Memorial and thanked the First Responders, Chief Regan, and Chief Sprengel for their participation and speeches; noted that video could be seen on the RBPD and RBFD social media pages; noted that he helped start the Kinds 5K and Riviera Village 5K that past weekend and also attended the Cal Water’s 100th Anniversary at Seaside Lagoon; noted that elected officials from across the region joined; reported that Swim the Avenues took place on Sunday, which was an event started by former Mayor Bill Brand and taken up by Rick Crump to continue the event; thanked the County and the lifeguards for supporting the event; reported meeting with one of the City’s Coastal Commissioners, Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, and Senator Ben Allen regarding different topics for Redondo Beach; noted that he will be having a follow-up meeting with both Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi and Senator Ben Allen over the next couple of weeks.
Councilmember Waller reported speaking to middle school students at Parras Middle School about his career, public service, and e-Bikes; reported attending the NRBBA Rise and Shine Redondo, the Chamber of Commerce Network Café, and a ribbon cutting for Raquel Butler Insurance on Thursday; stated that on Monday he got a briefing from LA County on coastal resilience and found they are working on a demonstration project for beach nourishment between the Pier and Topaz Jetty; reported that 300,000 cubic yards of sand will be added by early 2028 as well as a dune restoration; announced his Community Meeting will be next Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. online and late next week will be attending the League of California Cities’ Annual Conference in Anaheim.
Councilmember Castle reported attending the 9/11 Memorial service on Thursday and the last Cruzin’ the Lagoon on Friday; announced that there would be a Christmas Cruz on December 12th as part of the Boat Parade Celebration at the Waterfront.
Councilmember Kaluderovic thanked the Police and Fire Departments for holding the 9/11 Memorial; reported that she would be attending the LACAHSA Board Meeting, the South Bay Aerospace Alliance Board Meeting, and the South Bay Regional Housing Trust Meeting that week; announced the 2nd George Freeth Water Polo event would be on Saturday the 19th at the Harbor.
Mayor Light reported being interviewed by SF Gate on George Freeth and the article can be seen in Beach and Life Surf Culture Pre-George Freeth is a Totally Different Thing Than After George Freeth.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Councilmember Kaluderovic reported that the City had been certified functional zero for the third year in a row and explained how functional zero is calculated; noted that the average time a person stayed on the streets was only 17 days.
Councilmember Obagi thanked the Public Works Department for their work on publicly showing the work they do on their social media page; noted that it has been educational and helps the public understand the public safety they provide.
Councilmember Behrendt announced that he and Councilmember Obagi would be hosting a Community Event at the RBPAC on September 30th at 6:00 p.m. and their special guest would be Fire Chief Brian Regan.
E. APPROVE ORDER OF AGENDA
City Manager Witzansky asked to delay item H.8 until the first meeting in October.
Motion by Councilmember Castle, seconded by Councilmember Behrendt, to pull item H.8 until the first meeting in October and approve the rest of the agenda as written.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
F. AGENCY RECESS - None
G. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS - ADDITIONAL BACK UP MATERIALS
G.1. For Blue Folder Documents Approved at the City Council Meeting Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported three Blue Folder items: H.13, J.1, and N.1 Motion by Councilmember Waller, seconded by Councilmember Castle, to receive and file the Blue Folder items.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
H. CONSENT CALENDAR
H.1. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED AND REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2026
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.2. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER
READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
H.3. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:
A. AUGUST 18, 2026
B. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.4. PAYROLL DEMANDS
CHECKS 30756-30764 IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,222.88, PD. 9/11/26 DIRECT DEPOSIT 317097-317757 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,509,526.11, PD. 9/11/26
EFT/ACH $11,091.01, PD. 8/28/26 (PP2618)
EFT/ACH $482,203.60, PD. 9/4/26 (PP2617)
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEMANDS
CHECKS 126325-126578 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,923,243.96
REPLACEMENT DEMAND 126324
CONTACT: STEPHANIE MEYER, FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.5. APPROVE CONTRACTS UNDER $35,000:
1. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH STELLEN DESIGN LLC FOR AS
NEEDED CITY BRAND AND LOGO DESIGN SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $7,500 FOR THE TERM SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2027
CONTACT: JANE CHUNG, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
2. APPROVE AN APPLICATION TO OBTAIN RECERTIFICATION OF THE
ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING A STATEMENT OF
INTERESTS, FORM 700 WITH THE FAIR POLICITCAL PRACTICES
COMMISSION (FPPC) NOT TO EXCEED $1,000.
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.6. APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY OF
TORRANCE TO ESTABLISH A TEMPORARY PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT FOR THE CITY’S 9-1-1 EMERGENCY CALLS IN THE EVENT OF AN EQUIPMENT FAILURE OR EVACUATION OF THE CITY’S COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
CONTACT: STEPHEN SPRENGEL, CHIEF OF POLICE
H.7. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2609-075 A RESOLUTION OF
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING THE PAINTING OF THE RAIL BRIDGE CROSSING AT ARTESIA BOULEVARD AS “MAINTENANCE” AND EXEMPTING IT FROM FORMAL BIDDING REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 19.1(a) OF THE CITY
CHARTER OF REDONDO BEACH
APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH SIGNATURE PAINTING INC. FOR
MAINTENANCE PAINTING SERVICES OF THE RAIL CROSSING BRIDGE ON ARTESIA BOULEVARD, JOB NO. 41520, FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $225,000
CONTACT: ANDREW WINJE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
H.8. Delayed to the first meeting in October by City Manager Witzansky.
H.9. APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. FOR SEWER LINE CLEANING AND ROOT REMOVAL SERVICES FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $1,213,714 AND A NEW NOT TO EXCEED TOTAL OF $2,162,608 AND TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE AGREEMENT TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2029
CONTACT: ANDREW WINJE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
H.10. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH KW-F SBG OWNER, LLC (THE OWNER OF
THE SOUTH BAY GALLERIA) FOR THE OVERTIME DEPLOYMENT OF CITY
POLICE OFFICERS AT THE GALLERIA FOR A REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $90,000 PER YEAR, AND A CITY COMMITMENT TO CONTRIBUTE $30,000 OF UNREIMBURSED POLICE SERVICES ANNUALLY, FOR THE TERM SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2028, WITH A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $180,000 AND A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED UNREIMBURSED POLICE SERVICES AMOUNT OF $60,000 CONTACT: STEPHEN SPRENGEL, CHIEF OF POLICE
H.11. RECEIVE AND FILE THE REDONDO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT’S ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 3, CHAPTER 16 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND
ASSEMBLY BILL 481
CONTACT: STEPHEN SPRENGEL, CHIEF OF POLICE
H.12. APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR
FUNDING AND OPERATION OF THE REDONDO BEACH EMERGENCY
HOMELESS SHELTER (PALLET SHELTER) FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $145,927.74 AND THE TERM OCTOBER 1, 2026 TO MARCH 31, 2027
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
CONTACT: JOY A. FORD, CITY ATTORNEY
H.13. APPROVE A GRANT AWARD PACKAGE AND CONDITIONS, AND A CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES STATEMENT WITH THE U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE, FOR THE FY 2025 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL
JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) PROGRAM LOCAL FORMULA IN AN AMOUNT OF $16,336, FOR THE TERM OCTOBER 1, 2024 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027, AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE BOTH
ITEMS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
ADOPT BY 4/5THS VOTE AND BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2609- 076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A FISCAL YEAR 2026 - 2027 BUDGET MODIFICATION TO APPROPRIATE $16,336 IN BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE FY25 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) PROGRAM LOCAL FORMULA FUND FROM THE U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, TO THE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL GRANTS FUND
CONTACT: STEPHEN SPRENGEL, CHIEF OF POLICE
H.14. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2609-077, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
AND REPEALING ALL OTHER CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
H.15. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2609-078 OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING
THE FILING OF A CLAIM WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, WATERFRONT AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES DIRECTOR
H.16. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY RESOLUTION NO. CC-2609-079 A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING PURSUANT TO THE SURPLUS LAND ACT THAT CITY OWNED PROPERTY AT 179 N. HARBOR DRIVE IS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AND NOT NECESSARY FOR THE CITY’S USE THE PROPERTY INCLUDES
PORTIONS OF APN #S 7503-33-903, 7503-33-905, AND ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY - R-10 SOCIAL HOUSE AND RELATED
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, WATERFRONT AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES DIRECTOR
H.17. APPROVE THE AUDITED ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT (ACFR) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025
CONTACT: STEPHANIE MEYER, FINANCE DIRECTOR
H.18. ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3317-26 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 38, OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO HEDGES.
FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3318-26 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 1-2.01 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO GENERAL PENALTIES: CONTINUING VIOLATIONS. FOR SECOND
READING AND ADOPTION
ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3319-26 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 1-2.03 OF THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO INFRACTIONS. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
CONTACT: JOY A. FORD, CITY ATTORNEY
H.19. Councilmember Kaluderovic pulled this item.
H.20. RECEIVE AND FILE THE MONTHLY UPDATE TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 5, 2026
CONTACT: LUKE SMUDE, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
Councilmember Obagi thanked the Public Works Department for item H.7 and stated that the Artesia Train Bridge is in dire need of repainting.
Motion by Councilmember Castle, seconded by Councilmember Waller, to approve items H.1 through H.20 exclusive of items H.8 and H.19.
Mayor Light invited public comment.
Leslie Chzran, District 2 and Harbor Commissioner, spoke on H.20; noted that the City’s number one 3-year priority is economic vitality, with the number one goal being to enhance the Waterfront; stated that the City unfunded the Waterfront Director position, which is counterproductive to the Strategic Plan; stated that they discussed where people were allowed to fish and not allowed to fish at the Harbor Commission meeting the
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
previous evening and noted identifying and messaging where locals and tourists could fish falls in line with the objective to enhance the Waterfront; reported that designation is an authority given to the Waterfront Director; noted that the Waterfront takes a unique consideration and expertise and is one of the reasons why a Waterfront Department and Waterfront Director is key; highlighted item 3 within item H.20 regarding the boat ramp and stated that the Harbor Commission was unaware of the details in reducing the cost from $16.8 million to $8.7 million; reported that no details were shared with the Harbor Commission or the Boat Ramp Subcommittee on those changes; stated that the Harbor Commission requested at their meeting to be statused next month.
Councilmember Obagi stated that he continues to hear comments regarding the Waterfront Director position being vacated and it is not; spoke of Director Hause improving the Community Services Department and noted that 90% of her time has now been on the Waterfront.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported that there was no one online, one eComment for H.5 opposed, four eComments for H.7 opposed, and one eComment for H.9 opposed.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish read item H.7 adopt by title only Resolution No. CC-2609-075, item H.13 adopt by 4/5ths vote and by title only Resolution No. CC-2609-076, item H.14 adopt by title only Resolution No. CC-2609-0766, item H.15 adopt by title only Resolution No.CC-2609-078, item H.16 adopt by title only Resolution No. CC-2609-079, item H.18 adopt by title only Ordinance No. 3317-26 for second reading and adoption, adopt by title only Ordinance No. 3318-26 for second reading and adoption, and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 3319-26 for second reading and adoption.
I. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
H.19. AMEND THE REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
COMPENSATION FOR THE POSITIONS OF MAYOR, CITY
COUNCILMEMBER, CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3320-26, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 2-3.905 OF THE
REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND
BENEFITS OF THE MAYOR FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3321-26, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 2-3.906 OF THE
REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND
BENEFITS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST
READING
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3322-26, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 2-3.902 OF THE
REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND
BENEFITS OF THE CITY CLERK FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 3323-26 AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 2-3.903 OF THE
REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND
BENEFITS OF THE CITY TREASURER FOR INTRODUCTION AND FIRST
READING
CONTACT: DIANE STRICKFADEN, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Councilmember Kaluderovic stated due to budget constraints the Council should not approve the raises at this time and wait for another opportunity at another cycle; reported that she will be voting no and asked for Council support on that decision.
Motion by Councilmember Behrendt, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, to approve item H.19.
Mayor Light invited public comment.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Motion carried 4-1 by voice vote. Councilmember Kaluderovic was opposed.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish read item H.19 introduced by title only Ordinance No. 3320- 26 for introduction and first reading, introduced by title only Ordinance No.3321-26 for introduction and first reading, introduced by title only Ordinance No.3322-26 for introduction and first reading, introduced by title only Ordinance No. 3323-26 for introduction and first reading.
J. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
J.1. For eComments and Emails Received from the Public
Sean Brody spoke in support of a surf pool or surf park project in Redondo Beach; noted that being able to control the variables would add a lot of benefit to the community; reported that he has worked with surfing development projects across the world, consulted for more than 100 surfing federations, worked with the International Surf Association, and helped get surfing into the Olympic Games; stated that he is in support of any wave lagoon, surf park projects that come to the table in the near future.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
John Miller, 25-year resident, referenced opening a dental office at 105 West Torrance Blvd., Suite 100; stated that the lease terms have been in discussion for three months already and they are waiting on approval by the City; spoke of wanting to move forward with a formal lease draft with a seven-year commitment and very minimal concessions; asked for some guidance.
Mayor Light asked if he was waiting on from the City.
John Miller spoke of issues with an International Italian Trust and Estate due to the previous tenant.
City Manager Witzansky suggested John Miller speak with Katherine Buck, W.E.D.
Manager, afterwards.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Jim Mueller, District 5, referenced a report from the AREAS company regarding availability of properties on Artesia Blvd; stated the City has already learned through the LeBasse survey and the Farmers’ Market experience that people want the Artesia area to be pedestrian friendly; spoke of traffic and lack of public space on Artesia being a major concern to the community and asked if the City has investigated converting the freed up parking space to public space if the FAR proposal passes; spoke of other cities boosting revitalization by encouraging multi-attraction venues that cater to families and provided some examples.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Niki Negrete-Mitchell, District 3, thanked Councilmember Kaluderovic for her involvement with the metro topic; reported speaking to Janice Hahn, Supervisor Mitchell, and County staff and leadership regarding green space and said their policy is to maintain green space and not take down any trees; stated that during the Metro draft EIR she learned about Native American remains that are buried in the right-of-way, she reached out to the Gabrielino-Tongva but they had no stories for the area and suggested she reach out to the San Juan Capistrano-Tongva; stated it feels like a lot of work.
Holly Osborne (via Zoom), District 5, spoke on behalf of green space, trees, and shade wherever it is needed; stated that green space is not the same as open space and provided examples of where open space is being used instead of preserving green space; said she would fight any upzoning at Andrews next to the senior housing; spoke about El Nido Park and the proposed plans to add a new 209 space parking lot; stated that the City has an opportunity to provide impact statements when the Environmental Report is released and hoped the Council would fight for green space.
Gil Escontrias voiced concern that Community Meetings have become increasingly
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
aggressive and people seem frustrated; questioned the reasons for the behavior and mentioned it could be the lack of communication and information being given between the City and its representatives to the community; hoped they would not become more aggressive but that the community would still be able to speak their minds and explain their issues.
Mark Nelson (via Zoom) thanked Mike Klein and Mark Garlock from the Public Works Department for their quick response to an irrigation system failure; noted that he emailed at 11:30 p.m. the previous night, Mike Klein responded by 5:00 a.m., and there were trucks at the site by 11:00 a.m.; commented that he has no opinion about the wave pool item but felt it would be improper to front run Phase 1 processes that have been underway for years; referenced the Staff Report on the liquid gas storage at 2477 Manhattan Beach Blvd. and reported that the report continues to have errors; noted that the diagrams are incomplete and unlabeled, and the report uses the incorrect emergency management manual; stated that the draft ordinance is justified by staff statements that have no support in the record and there are no work papers or formal analysis; commented that it is a defective document, it does not meet requirements, and the statements are unfounded.
Wayne Craig, District 1, referenced the heated discussions happening at City Council District meetings; agreed that respect was needed by everyone and no one should prevent others from speaking or make it difficult to conduct the meeting; stated that people seem reluctant to participate in local government due to how they are treated by those in power; noted that the relationships between elected officials and residents do need to be addressed; highlighted the need to also address the division between North Redondo versus South Redondo residents and that the City should focus on the City as a whole and elected officials should too; noted that if the City wants people to participate in Commissions, committees, neighborhood organizations, and local government they need to create an environment that is welcoming; recommended that everyone stop labeling South and North Redondo and just thinking of it as Redondo Beach.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Jess Money, District 3, noted that he has been describing Redondo Beach government as an organized crime family for years and has realized others feel the same; spoke about a quote by the former head of Harvard Law School that said “if you view government as a criminal enterprise with corruptions as its organizing feature, suddenly a lot of things make sense.” ; noted that Seaside Lagoon would be debated later that evening but that he would not be participating in it and opined that the decision for Seaside Lagoon has already been made; noted that the Brown Act should prevent it but the Brown Act has never criminally convicted anyone for violating it in 76 years and that the California FOIA Act has also never criminally charged anyone in 53 years.
Joan Irvine (via Zoom), District 1, announced the Chamber of Commerce Women’s Conference on October 9th from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Sonesta Redondo Beach; reported that she would be a facilitator for a workshop called Ignite Your Resilience, Turning Challenges Into Strength and Possibility from 12:50 p.m. to 1:20 p.m.;
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
encouraged everyone to go to the redondochamber.org site to look at the events.
Andrew Ball, District 1, stated that he has lived on Pearl Street since 2012; spoke about how dangerous the intersection at PCH and Pearl St. is and that actions to put a stop light there have not improved the safety; asked that the City step up enforcement at that location or a traffic study be conducted to find a way to abate the dangerous speeds people are traveling on that road.
Carissa Robinson voiced her frustration surrounding the wave pool proposal; noted that the City had been working through a public process for Seaside Lagoon for years and then Allen Sanford’s wave pool was suddenly a topic; reported that no RFP, competitive process, or solicitation of proposals was done for the wave pool and no decision by City Council was made to explore a commercial wave pool; stated that an article in the Easy Reader circulated about a private proposal; reported that a presentation was given by a private proponent promoting his specific commercial concept at the Harbor Commission meeting on September 14th; reported that the proposal was not only for a wave pool but it would involve private commercial use and control of Mole D; noted that most of the public comments she heard during the Harbor Commission meeting were opposed to the privatization of the public park and there were 13 eComments opposed to the wave pool; stated that the Harbor Commission did not announce or acknowledge the 13 eComments; recommended that if the City wants to consider private commercial development on Mole D they open the conversation in a transparent public manner, open an RFP; opined that one unsolicited private proposal was not the way the City should handle the matter; noted that she is not opposed to wave pools but that there are more appropriate places to place one in the City; hoped that the City Council would consider having a public process to determine the use of public land.
K. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS - None
L. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
M. ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS AGENDAS - None
N. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION PRIOR TO ACTION
N.1. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE SEASIDE
LAGOON REHABILITATION PROJECT APPROVE THE FINAL
PREPARATION AND SUBMITTAL OF A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION FOR THE SEASIDE LAGOON REHABILITATION PROJECT AT 200 PORTOFINO WAY
APPROVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION DECLARATION FOR THE
PROJECT
CONTACT: ELIZABETH HAUSE, WATERFRONT AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES DIRECTOR AND MARC WEINER, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Mayor Light reported that he received a call from Senator Ben Allen’s Office regarding concerns that the grant would time out and stated that is not the case for the grant; noted that N.1 is not a debate on the wave pool and not on the design but it is to approve the application and the environmental exemption; asked the audience to respect and maintain decorum.
Waterfront and Community Services Director Hause provided an overview of what she would be presenting; gave a description of Seaside Lagoon, noted it is a saltwater swimming lagoon that is fed by the ocean, visitors are hosted daily, and it hosts special events and camps; reported that, in 2026, the Seaside Lagoon has been open 104 days, had over 67,000 admissions, and collected almost $780,000; stated that a primary concern at the Lagoon is water quality and maintenance quality and, due to aging infrastructure and water quality standards, the City has incurred fines over the last two decades; reported that the total fines and Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) costs have amounted to over $900,000 since 2001; explained that SEP cost is a Water Board approved supplemental environmental project that the City can implement in lieu of the fines; reported that between 2021 and 2022 the City put together a Waterfront Amenities Plan; noted that the community was engaged in developing the Waterfront Amenities Plan and the primary feedback received included: improved year-round access to Seaside Lagoon, a renewed water feature and beach experience, recreational amenities for multiple generations, and flexible open space and community uses; stated between 2022 and 2023 they transitioned to project design, they RFP for Lagoon design was approved in May 2022, and NUVIS was selected as the design firm; reported that the project specific community engagement began in 2023; reported that from 2023 to 2024 they began outreach to the community for Seaside Lagoon and reviewed the types of outreach the City provided; stated that in 2024 the feedback from the outreach and the design was brought to the Harbor Commission and the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend a complete phased renovation along with building placement Option 2 and promenade design Option 2; reported that the full build out estimate for all phases was about $31 million in 2024; noted that the project was brought to the City Council for approval in October 2024; reported that the concept for a combination Lagoon with a lap swimming facility, recreational amenities, and a two story operations and lifeguard building was approved by Council; stated that, between 2025 and 2026, they reached out to regulatory agencies to examine regulatory and site constraints for the lap pool and lagoon and went back to Council in April 2026 with an updated design reflecting the constraints; noted that the City Council provided additional direction for the project design and that staff presented the updated design to the Harbor Commission in August 2026; reported that the Harbor Commission confirmed that the project was consistent with applicable CEQA exemption requirements but recommended that Council pursue the design considered in 2024 with a 7-0 vote; noted that Council would need to decide on the preparation and submittal of a Coastal Development Permit; reviewed the project details such as: concrete bottom, water slide, fountain and splash features, lap swimming, new equipment, and a pump station, fencing, etc.; provided slides of the elements she described; noted that they incorporated showers with the restrooms as discussed at the last meeting; stated, if Council approves, the next steps would be to prepare and submit the project application to the California Coastal Commission and
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
then continue to work with the Commission staff to address any concerns or make modifications to the design; noted that any significant changes would be brought back to Council for approval; stated that they would develop construction plans and specifications for bidding at the same time, award the construction bid, and begin construction; noted that the timeline is quick but they believe they can complete construction and open the facility prior to the LA 2028 Olympics; provided staff’s recommendations to Council as: 1) Discuss the Seaside Lagoon Rehabilitation Project Design, 2) Approve the final preparation and submittal of a Coastal Development Permit Application to the CA Coastal Commission, and 3) Approve the Environment Exemption Declaration for the project; reported that Community Development Director Marc Wiener was also present to answer any questions regarding the CDP application or about CEQA; reported that the City’s team of consultants were also present to answer questions.
Mayor Light corrected his earlier comment about not discussing design, he meant they are not approving the detailed engineering drawings that evening; asked that the public comment be kept to addressing the Council and to keep the meeting civil.
Councilmember Behrendt thanked Waterfront and Community Services Director Hause, W.E.D Manager Katherine Buck, Dave Charobee, Mio Iwasaki, and other City staff that worked on the project; noted all the efforts they have put into the project and recognized their professionalism throughout.
Motion by Councilmember Behrendt, seconded by Councilmember Obagi, to authorize staff to proceed with final preparation and submittal of the Coastal Development Permit application for the Seaside Lagoon Rehabilitation Project, and to continue coordination with the California Coastal Commission staff throughout the permitting process, and to approve the Environmental Exemption Declaration.
Mayor Light invited public comment.
Niki Negrete-Mitchell, District 3, stated that she remembers the entire process, she attended one or two meetings, and participated in all the online polls; noted that it has been delayed for over 10 years and felt it was important not to delay Phase 1 any further; commented that the process seemed very thorough; urged that the project move forward with Phase 1 and that Council approve it.
Mark Nelson (via Zoom) supported Niki Negrete-Mitchell’s comments and agreed that Phase 1 needed to be locked down as soon as possible; stated that he did not think the application was ready and gave his reasons for his statement; suggested that they discuss it more that evening; reported that he watched the Harbor Commission meeting and it appeared that the Commission was not aware of what Phase 1 had turned into; recommended that the Harbor Commission and the City Council get better synced.
Doug Boswell, District 3, spoke about Seaside Lagoon being a multigenerational, recreational amenity that is unique to Redondo Beach and how it has positively
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
impacted his family throughout the years; stated that Seaside Lagoon is the one place that unites North and South Redondo and the value cannot be quantified; noted the year-round uses at minimal expense that the Lagoon is able to maintain; said that the Lagoon would likely pay for itself between admission fees and Special Event Permits; commented that the City needs to stop thinking about ways to maximize the financial return of a public park; stated that Craven Commercial want to exploit the space with a wave pool and the main beneficiary would be Allen Sanford’s private club and restaurant; provided other sites for a wave pool and asked that the grant money for Seaside Lagoon be used to fix it up to honor the past and pay it forward to the next generations.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online, two eComments with no position, two eComments opposed, and 25 eComments in support.
Kristina Miller, District 3, provided her background information; asked that the Council keep the public project that had already been studied, designed, discussed, and funded and not delay Phase 1 with a new wave pool concept; stated that several concerns needed to be addressed: 1) that the new wave pool idea is tied to the approval of Phase 1 because it shouldn’t be, 2) the financial numbers do not add up; stated that it would take 85 years to recover the initial investment and spoke of the comparison to El Segundo’s wave pool and the incorrect assumption that it will not compete with a wave pool at Seaside Lagoon, and 3) that the timing deserves scrutiny because the City is in negotiations with BeachLife regarding Seaside Lagoon and the new commercial concept was introduced as existing agreements are being discussed; wondered if the decisions are connected and if it affects the City’s negotiating position; requested that the Council approve Phase 1 and work through the feedback raised by the Harbor Commission.
Mayor Light reminded the public that the Council was not voting on the wave pool that evening and it was not on the agenda for discussion; stated that the decision that evening was whether the Council approves the CDP or not.
Nancy Skiba (via Zoom), District 4, commented that the Harbor Commission Chair said the current Phase 1 is not what they thought it was during the Harbor Commission meeting; recommended that common ground be found so the repairs, renovations, and maintenance could be moved forward; noted that the wave pool could be built somewhere else; voiced support for the item and appreciated Doug Boswell’s comments.
Carlos Meza voiced support for the proposed wave pool at Seaside Lagoon; stated that his daughter is an eight-time National Surf Champion who grew up surfing at Sapphire St. in Redondo Beach; spoke more about the positive impact wave pools have had on his daughter and the value of having wave pools for the community; hoped that the project would have a fair and full evaluation before being denied; urged the Council to give the proposal the public review it deserves.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no participants online.
Chris Brown thanked the City Council for all they do; reported that he has two kids and hoped that they would get a better version of Seaside Lagoon than he had; opined that the plan that the City Council and the Harbor Commission are reviewing is not a better version of Seaside Lagoon; stated that he watched the Harbor Commission meeting and the Commission said the proposal they are looking at is unrecognizable; reported that the Commission voted 7-0 on their recommendation and asked the Council to please listen to the Harbor Commission.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no participants online.
Jeff Miller reported that he only went to Seaside Lagoon once or twice as a kid and has only taken his kids there once or twice because it is never open; stated that the new Phase 1 approach does not change that and the same issue will happen 10 to 20 years from now of a place that is unused most of the time; opined that the current Phase 1 approach does not lead the City to where the public wants it to be.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no participants online.
Jay Gleason, 35-year resident, spoke about the success of the wave pool in Waco, TX; stated that the wave pool plan would enhance Seaside Lagoon; provided the cumulative economic impacts of the Waco Surf Pool for the City of Waco and McLennan County since 2022; said he understood the wave pool was not being voted on that evening but hoped that it would be explored for the future for the City.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no participants online.
Carissa Wright, District 1, noted the time and effort that has gone into planning Seaside Lagoon but felt that a large portion of the community was unaware of the plans and did not have an opportunity to provide input; reported that she is a realtor in the community and did an informal poll of 10 young families in District 1; reported that only two of the families had ever taken their kids to Seaside Lagoon and collectively the 10 families have 24 children; noted that the concerns of herself and of those families are the water quality, condition of the facilities, and the lack of investment in the space; hoped that the City would better utilize the Waterfront space and create a more welcoming atmosphere; noted that a more attractive Waterfront would give residents and visitors a reason to spend more time at the Waterfront which would support the local economy; spoke of the generations that would use the Lagoon; asked the Council to think bigger and address the infrastructure, the water issues, and create a beautiful, safe, activated community space.
John Mark Weston (via Zoom) echoed the statements of the last speaker; stated that he has spent most of his time living around Seaside Lagoon and walks by it multiple times a day; emphasized that the City is not thinking big enough and that they should be creating something that could be memorable 40 to 50 years from now; asked that the
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Council consider a bigger picture.
Ryan Harris reported that he is a professional surfboard shaper and supported the wave pool idea; noted that he is a 25-year resident of the South Bay; stated that the City needs to do better with regard to Seaside Lagoon and voiced his disappointment that it is only open three months out of the year; provided his feedback on wave pools and what surfers prefer; supported looking into the opportunity for the wave pool.
Joan Irvine (via Zoom), District 1, stated that in the 1900’s Redondo Beach was considered the top resort to visit and the features the Pier offered attracted people to come; stated that whatever is designed needs to bring people down and also needs to pay for itself; voiced concerns over taxes being incurred by residents, which they have experienced before; hoped that whatever is considered will bring people into the City and bring revenue into the City for decades.
Walt Howells, District 2 and 80-year resident, noted that he and Bill Brand spoke about getting the Lagoon rebuilt, not using sea water, and bringing in fresh water with a new hydraulic system to monitor it; stated he is against approaching the Coastal Commission at the 11th hour with an approval and felt it is out of character for Redondo Beach to go forward with a private enterprise on public land; mentioned that Bill Brand fought to keep public lands public and for more parks and open space.
Mia Kartsonis, speaking on behalf of Shade Hotel Redondo Beach, spoke in support of moving forward with the Seaside Lagoon Rehabilitation Project; spoke of the aging infrastructure and ongoing water quality penalties not being sustainable; stated that modernizing the Lagoon is a critical investment for Redondo’s future; noted that the project would provide three major wins for the City: 1) safety and reliability, 2) environmental compliance, and 3) economic growth; urged, on behalf of the Shade Hotel, to vote in favor of advancing the Seaside Lagoon Rehabilitation Project.
Steve Edwards, District 2, stated he thought more should be evaluated, recommended holding off on the Coastal Commission submittal, and having people do more research for it; noted that good public private partnerships involve public that is involved; stated that ground leases work.
Mary Delehanty (via Zoom) stated that she would love to preserve the Lagoon and noted its family friendly atmosphere; voiced concern that families would not be able to pay $150 an hour per child for the wave pool, especially with so many good surf spots in the area; stated that there are a lot of events that could raise money and bring families together; thanked everyone for their time and effort.
Mark Cole reported being a lifelong Redondo resident and has lived in Districts 2, 4, and 5; stated that the City is at the precipice of a generational opportunity and encouraged the Council to study the new option; said he wanted the space to be open to the public; noted that he has participated in almost every activity in the Harbor, spends a lot of time at King Harbor Yacht Club, and wants what’s best for Redondo; spoke of the
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
opportunity to potentially develop a wave pool while retaining most of the aspects of Seaside Lagoon or make it better; commented that the current plan would make the Lagoon worse and would change the character of the Lagoon; opined that Bill Brand would be interested in a potential wave pool; suggested that the Council investigate the potential opportunities.
Laura Kastner, District 2, asked that the Council move the Seaside Lagoon but rebuild it forward by doing the work to fund future phases, find funding, and prioritize public investment in the amenities residents need; stated that the community does not need to have a commercial wave pool to justify investing in the City’s own public park; spoke of the discussion failing to focus on the children, their swimming space, their summer camps, and affordable recreation and those should have been the priorities from the beginning; questioned why a private business proposal was being treated as the answer and why there is not urgency to fully fund the public project; urged the Council to approve the permit submission, keep the rehabilitation moving, and bring residents a concrete funding plan for the remaining phases and amenities.
Mindy Czuleger, District 1, noted that she has worked in the Riviera Village as a massage therapist for 30 years; stated that she appreciates Allen Sanford’s dream but felt the City is passed the point of entertaining his idea; noted that the new proposal is self-serving and it doesn’t help anyone but the Beach Club people who are part of his club; noted that she doesn’t mind changing the concept of the Lagoon but it should feel more community friendly and that the new concept would not be affordable to everyone; provided some ideas such as a lap pool with a side for a sandy bottom where children could play; suggested that Redondo Beach host the Junior Olympic Water Polo, which is a “Stay and Play’ event, and would generate revenue.
Jacob Mark (via Zoom) stated that the topic had gone sideways because the Mayor had stated at the beginning that the vote that evening had nothing to do with the wave pool; echoed Director Hause that the plan was proposed in 2024, it consisted of a deep salt water pool and a full sandy bottom but due to budget constraints the project came back to Council; noted that the project now consists of a fresh water pool (no longer a lagoon), minimal sand, and it is only five-feet deep; commented that the Lagoon is losing all its character and explained that his “No” vote is not in regards to the wave pool but for the current proposed plan; requested that the original vision that all the citizens provided feedback for is put back into place; suggested that everyone stop focusing on the wave pool and figure out ways to raise funds so the original vision for Seaside Lagoon could be realized.
Amy Russell, District 4, reported attending the Harbor Commission meeting the night before; stated that she looked at the King Harbor Amenities Plan draft, which included utilization numbers for Seaside Lagoon and one of the options was a wave pool; noted that the wave pool was deemed too large to be feasible for the area; questioned how much square footage the City is willing to give up for a four-foot wave and what would be left for the intended use for families and children; voiced concern that the original intent was being lost; referenced the Harbor Commission’s letter in the Blue Folder and
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
suggested that the concerns of the Harbor Commission and the presentation should be reconciled; reported that the idea of a wave pool is not new to the City and it has been considered for both the Dive N’ Surf and the CenterCal development and neither was implemented; opined that a profit making venture does not belong in a State Regional Park and that the California Coastal Commission would unlikely entertain that option anyways; stressed that the footprint required to build the wave pool would reduce the Seaside Lagoon footprint and the primary beneficiary would be the California Surf Club.
Carmen S. (via Zoom), District 2, urged that the Council approve Phase 1; noted that a wave pool would mean the public would lose a huge part of the public footprint for private commercial amenities; supported approving Phase 1 because it would resolve the water quality fines and would open nearly an acre of lawn and sand all season.
Pack Landfair, owner of El Porto Surf Shop, spoke about his business; stated that he heard Redondo Beach City Council is making special business deals with surf businesses and wanted to throw his hat in the ring.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Kim Ridley, 11-year resident, provided some background on himself; noted that millions and millions of dollars have been wasted changing the plans for Seaside Lagoon since 2006 (the Mayor reported discussions on Seaside Lagoon started in 2006); opined that Seaside Lagoon should continue to have sand and salt water but that they should add affordable amenities to the location and open it year round; suggested music, car culture, and BBQ pits; asked that the Council and City keep Seaside Lagoon public, affordable, and open it year round.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Leslie Chrzan, District 2 and Harbor Commissioner, reported she is on the Seaside Lagoon Subcommittee; stated that public space, the Coastal Commission’s goals to preserve and expand public access, and the City serving the region as an introduction to the ocean were important; stated that the City should not accept what is substantially less than what the Lagoon currently has and that the Lagoon should remain salt water, sandy bottomed, and retain the deep water; explained why it is important to keep the deep water and noted that the City is mandated by the State for the facility as an introduction to the ocean; stated that saving money to make it a wading pool is shortsighted and goes against the community’s will; stated that they asked for the Council to pursue entitlements for all four phases for the full design and the Council agreed to it; noted that they are only discussing Phase 1 and that the Harbor Commission identified that the sea level rise had not been considered even though that was a starting requirement; reported that she did a deep dive into all the documents of the work that had been done over the last two weeks; noted that she is a mechanical engineer and recognized the City adding a pressure relief valve does help but only for static conditions; explained the differences in conditions and what contingencies the City should be planning for if they are designing for 2050 sea level rise; noted that the
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
grant requires the lagoon be enhanced, not just water compliant, and they have to plan for operating and maintenance costs; stated none of that has been considered and to proceed at this time would be negligent; spoke about the current design feeling abandoned and too many details are missing; suggested they slow down and get it right because it will impact generations.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Paul Bryan, 12-year resident, provided details and data on trips he has taken to experience surfing in various locations; stated that he feels Redondo Beach is missing out on a huge revenue opportunity and a huge opportunity to revitalize the Waterfront.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Tom Bauer, 25-year resident and Harbor Commissioner, noted that if the City is looking at preserving Seaside Lagoon they are compromising because there is not enough money to do it properly; stated what the Harbor Commission is asking is to pause it, set some aggressive goals, and revisit the plan; referenced Measure C and noted that the current design does not expand the Lagoon and it removes the salt water which Measure C allows for but the budget does not; questioned why the City report states the proposal strengthens connections to the Harbor when the design is essentially creating a fresh water wading pool; questioned how the design enhances the Lagoon adjacent recreational facilities; opined that they are going backwards and recommended that the City pause; stated that a public private partnership does give the City opportunity for more money and that they could structure it to revert the facility back to the City after a stated number of years; suggested that the Council take a look at the numbers; noted that wave pools could generate a lot of income and private corporations would be willing to invest the money to make it amazing.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Davis, Shade Hotel, voiced support for the wave pool; stated that guests and staff never speak of the Lagoon; noted that the space is underutilized and that modernizing it would benefit the area; spoke of Redondo Beach being one of the best places to live and would love to see the opportunity taken by the City to capitalize on it.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Pete Delgado, 25-year resident, reported that he has a blog that studies wave pools and artificial surf reefs; noted that he does not support Council moving forward to submit the plans to the Coastal Commission because there is new information that needs to be considered for the long term future of the City; wanted to shed light on some facts and figures since he heard some misinformation that evening; reported that 10 to 20 people could be in a wave pool at once, that a wave pool could be built in 60,000 sq. ft, and that would leave about 115,000 sq. ft. of space for the general admission visitors; stated that it is not all about economic vitality but that more people would be able to enjoy the
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Lagoon if the wave pool option was chosen.
Chris Druliner (via Zoom), 50-year Hermosa Beach resident, spoke of the demographics for the Lagoon and that the wave pool would bring in adolescents as well as the older crowd; wondered how many people have brought their kids to Seaside Lagoon since they were 13 and noted that he has not; opined that the economics made sense and the use of the land made sense for the wave pool concept.
Gary Ohst stated he is the face behind a document called Seaside Lagoon 2.0; reported watching the August 25th Harbor Commission meeting and noted the frustration was palpable; spoke of the changes made to the Harbor Amenities Plan and the degrading state of the Seaside Lagoon; opined that it would not make it past the California Coastal Commission; voiced his concern that a Councilmember motioned and another Councilmember seconded the motion before hearing public testimony; pointed out that the Harbor Commission voted 7-0 to pause the plan and made a motion to solicit presentations for multiple parties to weigh in on how to make the Lagoon better; reported that he responded to the motion with a document that highlights serious flaws and ideas to make it better; commented that the Council seems to want to tie the hands of the community and take the debate to the Coastal Commission.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Paul Hugoboom, 65-year resident, provided background information on his experience as a lifeguard, an instructor, and volunteer; implored the Council to pause on the plan for Seaside Lagoon and hear the views of others; spoke about his experiences with children and the ocean, highlighted the benefits of being in the water and outside, and noted that the youth spend too much time indoors and disconnected from nature; stated that water changes lives and builds character; stated that the project would positively impact Redondo Beach and bring more visitors to support the local economy; commented that it is a good opportunity for the City to explore the possibilities and get it right for everybody.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported Rick Howard was online but there was no response.
Allen Sanford stated that he wanted to explain his motivation for his actions; noted that he did not do it for self-interest, not to build a surf pool, and not for the money; voiced concern for the level of discourse that he has seen online; asked the Council to consider two things: 1) do they know beach and surf culture, do they know about the Seaside Lagoon vision from 1962, and if they knew what “introduction to ocean” meant and, 2) that the City’s number one thing on their Strategic Plan is economic vitality; noted that there have been no discussion on whether the plan has an economic impact; reported that Senator Ben Allen suggested they study long-term economic sustainability when he provided the grant; questioned if the Council has considered how much it will cost to run the proposed plan with all the new technology; reported that he does not use the Lagoon and pointed out that it is closed 75% of the year; noted that the City does not have the public money to do anything, and that there is no con to waiting and rethinking.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Rick Howard, 30-year resident, reported that he has never been to Seaside Lagoon; stated that the City has an opportunity to create something for everyone to enjoy; noted that he worked on the Redondo Beach Skate Park and has seen what that has done for the community; opined that Bill Brand would have been excited about the wave pool since he was a surfer; stated that he has travelled all over to visit wave pools and felt that the economic impact would be good for the City.
Mark Hansen reported that he was a member of the King Harbor Public Amenities Working Group and has attended all the meetings involving Seaside Lagoon; stated that he was impressed by the secondary wave in the King Harbor Association/Sanford plan; commented that between October 2024 to April 2026 the process disconnected and instead of the plan going back to the Seaside Lagoon Subcommittee, as expected, it went straight to City Council; noted that the Harbor Commission was unaware of the meeting that happened in April 2026 and was overwhelmed during the Harbor Commission meeting on August 25, 2026 because so many changes were made to the plan; implored the Council to honor the hard work done by the Harbor Commissioners when they consider the motion; reported that the Harbor Commission submitted a letter earlier that day to the City Council and asked that they consider what is in that letter and pause on the approval; suggested that the Council talk with Allen Sanford and others, engage the community, and respect the Harbor Commissioners.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Anika Blair, Redondo Beach resident since 1976, stated that she spent many summers at Seaside Lagoon because it was the only affordable place her mother could take them; noted that for the past 30 years she has seen family and friends spend time at Seaside Lagoon; stressed the affordability of the amenity; stated that approving Phase 1 does not freeze the City’s options, it establishes a baseline, it protects three years of engineering, honors over $2 million in taxpayer funds already invested, and keeps the City on track for a 2028 opening; noted that hitting pause that evening does not keep the City’s options open, it stops the clock and diverts staff; reported that Seaside Lagoon hosts affordable summer day camps for over 1,500 children every summer and a further pause would impact that; stated that the full footprint of Seaside Lagoon is needed and the City should not cut public park down at all; reported that surrendering public acreage for an exclusive pay to play place would violate Measure C and the City’s CLC Program and they have unprotected municipal liability to consider as well; asked that they consider why the residents of Redondo Beach voted on Measure C, where working parents will have their kids spend their summers if the plan is paused for a decade, why they would discard a decade of community input, three years of completed engineering, and over $2 million in taxpayer dollars just to be back at square one; recommended that the Council vote yes on Phase 1 and direct staff to make smart refinements within the scope of 2028.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Leslie Campeggi, 35-year resident, noted that pausing to consider alternative proposals
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
would delay anything happening for 18 to 36 months; stated that the Lagoon has already been drained and that the City does not have any water distribution permits so the Lagoon can’t operate next year anyways; noted that Seaside Lagoon is not an underutilized Redondo Beach City asset and that it should not be the town center for economic vitality for the City because it is a State Regional Park; stated that it conforms to Measure C, conforms to the City’s LCP, and it is under the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission; reported that the plans being discussed will not fly under the requirements because it is a Regional State Park to be used by everyone; suggested that they consider moving forward with Phase 1 in parallel with the City’s application for a permit to disclose components of Seaside Lagoon 2.0 from Gary Ohst with deliberations on it, and capture some of the vital components that the Harbor Commission recommended.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Carissa Robinson, District 3, supported the Council in approving the Phase 1 plans and moving the application forward to the Coastal Commission; reminded everyone that Seaside Lagoon and Mole D are public spaces on California Tidelands and that Seaside Lagoon is a designated State Park; stated that she has spent her life advocating for public spaces and public lands and learned that once public spaces are given to private commercial use getting it back is very difficult; noted all the time and effort that has been put into Seaside Lagoon over the past five years through public process, said that she also has some concerns about Phase 1, but that Phase 1 is not the final vision but it should be moved forward; suggested that the City could continue to refine the plan but protect the character of the Lagoon, and continue to look for additional funding; said if Council is not prepared to move forward that they take a short pause and consider Gary Ohst’s Seaside Lagoon 2.0; stated that concerns about Phase 1 should not be used to abandon five years of public work and that entertaining an unsolicited private commercial proposal is a separate conversation and would need to be done through transparent public process; stressed that the Council should move forward towards the goal that was started which is rehabilitating and improving Seaside Lagoon for the public.
Assistant City Clerk Kalish reported no one online.
Mayor Light closed public comment; noted that there was a motion on the floor; stated that he has been politically active in the City since 2000 and provided some history regarding workshops, potential closures, and public outreach to save Seaside Lagoon; provided details on CenterCal’s plans and how the public rallied to save Seaside Lagoon; stated that this is the closest they have been to revitalizing the facility; applauded Allen Sanford and the Surf Club for going into the Harbor and explained that other investment is being negotiated for economic revitalization there; noted that Redondo Beach is park poor which makes parks a precious resource for the community; noted that the Bill Brand Gateway Park is added park land and the City is trying to expand it; stated that the discussion that evening was about 3.2 acres on the Waterfront and that they have lots of things to consider; stated that the primary driver in
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
rehabilitating Seaside Lagoon were the fines that the City was incurring; stated that the job of the Council is not to maximize revenue out of a public park; noted that they are obligated to consider the Coastal Act, the Tidelands Trust, and the City’s LCP; reported that the City is obligated to protect the park on behalf of the State of California, that less than 1% of people in LA County surf, and that $100 an hour to surf is not something most can afford; noted that the City Council is not the final arbiters and that the Coastal Commission retains jurisdiction on anything in the Tidelands, which is where Seaside Lagoon is located, and that is why they are applying for a Coastal Development Permit; recognized and applauded everyone that came forward on both sides to express their views and appreciate all the ideas; stated that once the decision is set for the location of the Lagoon it will dictate what else can be done around it so the decision they make that evening is a factor; spoke about all the years of work put into the plan already, apologized for the disrespect they showed to the Harbor Commission by not bringing it back to them after changes were made, and promised that they would do better; opened the floor to the Council.
Councilmember Waller asked staff if they knew how long it would take to get on the Coastal Commission’s agenda if they pass the item that evening.
City Manager Witzansky responded that said it is normally four to six months, but they may be able to accelerate the process.
Mayor Light left the dais at 9:02 p.m. and returned at approximately 9:04 p.m.
Councilmember Waller stated that the Staff Report addressed sea level rise, but the presentation did not address it and asked if staff could provide what the Staff Report said about it.
Waterfront and Community Services Director Hause reported that Director Wiener and her met with the Harbor Commission a few weeks prior and asked about standards needed to build the Lagoon for 2050 sea level rise; reported that the Commission shared the Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance and the California Ocean Protection Council’s 2024 State Sea Level Rise Guidance; stated that are not expected to be able to predict sea level rises but that cities need to provide adaptive measures for future estimates; said that the Staff Report showed that they could provide those measures by increasing the bulkhead and doing a pressure relief valve system at the bottom of the Lagoon.
City Manager Witzansky stated that is one reason they recommended the shallower depth facility and provided more explanation; reported that the Council directed staff to get to five feet of water depth which he felt was a good adaptation strategy and would be well received by the Coastal Commission; spoke about the bulkhead strategy, noted that it was cost effective and an engineering strategy and provided more explanation; stated that he thinks the plan accommodates and has a reasonable planning horizon and that is the argument they will be making to the Coastal Commission.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Councilmember Waller asked what it would take to go to an eight-foot-deep Seaside Lagoon.
City Manager Witzansky noted that they hoped that they could retain the current depth, but it is not a feasible engineering solution, it would create incredible cost, and the risk of degradation would be higher with the proposed plan; stated if they had the money, it could be done.
Mayor Light added that more depth would incur more risk from sea level rise.
Councilmember Waller asked if the ocean salt water was ever considered since it seems to be another issue the public is concerned about.
City Manager Witzansky stated that the whole point of the reconstruction of the Lagoon is to get out of the sea water intake and sea water discharge business; stressed that the City cannot retain the facility in its current operating condition and explained the reasons why; noted that the City was threatened with the potential of $21.2 billion in fines and it was possible under the regulatory framework that is in the NPD’s permit; reported that the City had been fighting against discharge issues for years and they cannot sustain the staff time and resources to manage it; stated that the proposed plan always had chlorinated fresh water with a circulating system so they can control the water quality in the Lagoon that the patrons swim in; noted that times have changed and regulations have changed and it would be impossible to maintain and meet the County Health Standards and the State Water Board standards of today.
Councilmember Waller noted that the 2024 original plan noted salt water and asked if it was ocean water or salt water.
City Manager Witzansky responded that it was some level of additive salt in water and it was never ocean water in that concept; noted that Engineering had concerns of how to dispose of the additive salt water and the impact it might have on the City’s wastewater infrastructure.
Councilmember Waller referred to the Current vs. Projected Costs slide from the presentation; asked what the revenue would be for Seaside Lagoon if they did Phase 1 including the costs of maintenance.
Waterfront and Community Services Director Hause stated that the projected costs show that it would be more cost effective to have the new system in place.
City Manager Witzansky explained that the City currently has heavy chlorination costs, heavy dichlorination costs, and they have to add a lot of chemicals to the sea water to make it swimmable under the County requirements; stated that the new facility will cost less to maintain and operate and they expect a positive economic impact on the City’s Tidelands Fund.
Councilmember Waller noted that nothing was mentioned for revenue from additional
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
events that might be possible if the facility was open year-round.
Councilmember Castle added to Councilmember Waller’s comment that moving the water feature further west would offer more land in the front; asked if they anticipated more revenue from events that aren’t water related.
Waterfront and Community Services Director Hause responded that there is potential to market the space and host more people but could not predict what that would be.
City Manager Witzansky pointed out that currently they have limited flexibility with the water amenity to start and stop it and the new facility would allow the City to operate more in a more flexible way; noted that they expect some enhanced usability of the space on the off-season; stated that he did not want to over promise and they are still discussing possibilities and need to consider safety as well; noted that there will likely be more events but they have not identified them yet.
Mayor Light noted that they are not in the construction phase yet and they have the ability to change some of the fencing over time to open more space.
Councilmember Waller commented that, if Phase 1 doesn’t preclude adding things like a wave pool in the future, they could get the public’s input over the next three years, entertain other proposals, and look at better uses for areas.
More discussion followed regarding different iterations of future phases but to keep in mind constraints.
Mayor Light pointed out that the Council approved the Harbor Commission’s recommendation of expanding the park into the roundabout.
Councilmember Kaluderovic stated that they are advocating for more funds for the project and other things in the City; commented that they can move the item forward while continuing to evolve and refine the plan.
Councilmember Obagi referenced a speaker that said the Council’s current plan proposes to lock in low income uses for generations to come and commented that it was off putting for him; stated that the intention of Seaside Lagoon was to be a place for 50,000 people of all types, colors, demographic, and geographic location to come and enjoy; stated that he is not mandated to convert public land into a public private partnership; commented that no surf club or wave pool developer has approached the City asking for the space; noted that there are other opportunities in Redondo Beach and mentioned the power plant with multiple acres in bankruptcy.
Mayor Light reminded everyone that the motion on the floor is to approve final preparation and submittal of a Coastal Development Permit application to the Coastal Commission and approve Environmental Exemption Declaration for the project.
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
Motion by Councilmember Castle, seconded by Councilmember Behrendt, for a fiveminute break to return at 9:30 p.m.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
RECONVENE TO REGULAR MEETING FROM BREAK – 9:33 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Waller, Castle, Kaluderovic, Obagi, Behrendt, Mayor Light
Councilmembers Absent: None
Officials Present: Eleanor Manzano, City Clerk
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Derek Kalish, Assistant City Clerk
O. CITY MANAGER ITEMS
City Manager Witzansky reported that next Tuesday the Council is dark, that there is Commission training and orientation on September 29th in the Chambers, and they will be back on the first Tuesday in October.
P. MAYOR AND COUNCIL ITEMS
P.1. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A MAYOR APPOINTMENT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION DUE TO A VACANCY
CONTACT: ELEANOR MANZANO, CITY CLERK
Mayor Light stated that he recommended Rick Luce for the open position on the Planning Commission.
Motion by Councilmember Behrendt, seconded by Councilmember Castle, to confirm Rick Luce to fill the spot on the Planning Commission.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
City Clerk Manzano reported that she could swear in Rick Luce the following day.
Q. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REFERRALS TO STAFF
Councilmember Obagi asked for a BRR to have the designer on Measure FP for the
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Police Station come and update the Council so the Council can make an educated decision on how to move forward with the current money; spoke about getting resident feedback and possibly seek support for more funding for a single police station.
City Manager Witzansky reported that the intention is to come back to Council in the next two to three months; noted it is the next step in the planning process.
Discussion followed on what would be provided for their review and the ability to make changes.
Councilmember Castle asked to add a friendly amendment that, if there is a delay, estimates of the rate of inflation of construction be included; noted that a year delay could cost $9 million.
City Manager Witzansky noted that part of the plan, is to create a concept that can be phased and additional square footage could be added later.
Mayor Light supported the plan to do it on schedule versus an early version due to time and money.
More discussion followed regarding the scheduled planning.
City Manager Witzansky clarified that they are not at the value engineering stage but currently at the spatial planning engineering stage; stated what they are conceptualizing at this time is: a 25,000 sq. ft. newly constructed Main Station, a renovated basement at 5,500 sq. ft., a renovated Annex, and approximately 10,000 sq. ft. for the Police facilities.
R. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION - None
R.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
Phillip Mack v. City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1-20, inclusive Case No: 24TRCV03382
R.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND LABOR NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Sec. 54957.6.
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Diane Strickfaden, Director of Human Resources
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS:
Redondo Beach Professional and Supervisory Association
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
R.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Elizabeth Hause, Waterfront & Community Services Director Katherine Buck, Waterfront & Economic Development Manager PROPERTY:
400 North Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: AIN: 7503-013-901)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:
Redondo Beach Hotel, Sunrise-Harbor, Ltd.
UNDER NEGOTIATION:
Terms
R.4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8.
AGENCY NEGOTIATOR:
Mike Witzansky, City Manager
Elizabeth Hause, Waterfront & Community Services Director Katherine Buck, Waterfront & Economic Development Manager PROPERTY:
206 Fisherman’s Wharf, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
(a portion of APN: AIN: 7505-002-933)
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:
Prospective Tenants
UNDER NEGOTIATION:
Lease Status
R.5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
New Commune DTLA, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, et al.
Case Number: B337897
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
R.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCV10146
R.7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 23STCP02189
R.8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
Yes in My Back Yard, a California nonprofit corporation; SONJA TRAUSS, an individual v. City of Redondo Beach; City Council of the City of Redondo Beach; City of Redondo Beach Department of Community Development, and DOES 1 through 25 inclusive
Case Number: 23TRCP00325
R.9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Name of case:
In re 9300 Wilshire LLC Bankruptcy C.D. Cal.
Case Number: 2:23-bk-10918-ER
R.10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - The Closed Session is authorized by the attorney-client privilege, Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1). Name of case: In re 9300 Wilshire, LLC (9300 Wilshire, LLC et al. v. AES-Redondo Beach, LLC)
Bankruptcy C.D. Cal. Case Number: 2:23-ap-01163-ER
S. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – None
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
T. ROLL CALL – None
U. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS - None
V. ADJOURNMENT – 9:43 P.M.
V.1. ADJOURN IN MEMORY OF DOKO “SOPEN” KALUDEROVIC, FATHER-INLAW OF COUNCIL MEMBER PAIGE KALUDEROVIC Councilmember Kaluderovic invited her daughter Clara to the podium to speak about her grandfather.
Clara Kaluderovic prepared a speech in honor of her grandfather, Doko “Sopen” Kaluderovic; spoke about his life, noted that she called him Deta but everyone else called him Sopen, he was a professional basketball player in Yugoslavia, moved his family to protect them, and used a Bosnian word to describe that he lived a “perfect” or “right” life.
Councilmember Kaluderovic stated that she is honored to have the name Kaluderovic, which means strength and kindness, and to carry it forward; noted that he was an incredible man.
Motion by Councilmember Kaluderovic, seconded by Councilmember Castle, to adjourn the meeting in honor of Doko “Sopen” Kaluderovic.
Motion carried 5-0 by voice vote.
The next meeting of the City Council of the City of Redondo Beach will be an Adjourned Regular meeting to be held at 4:00 p.m. (Closed Session) and a Regular meeting to be held at 6:00 p.m. (Open Session) on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, in the Redondo Beach City Hall Council Chamber, 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, California.
All written comments submitted via eComment are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.
Respectfully submitted:
Eleanor Manzano, CMC
City Clerk