Agenda packet — Reedley City Council, April 12, 2022

ALL CELL PHONES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES MUST BE

TURNED OFF IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.

TUESDAY, April 12, 2022
Meeting Held in the Council Chambers
845 "G" Street, Reedley, California
www.reedley.ca.gov
The Council Chambers are accessible to the physically disabled. Requests for additional accommodations for the disabled, including auxiliary aids or to request translation services, should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at 637-4200 ext. 212.

Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a Council meeting or hearing, no documents shall be accepted for Council review unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk by the close of business one day prior to said Council meeting/hearing at which the Council will consider the item to which the documents relate, pursuant to the adopted City Council Protocols.

The meeting will be webcast and accessed at: http://www.reedley.com/livestream.php *PLEASE SEE LAST PAGE OF AGENDA FOR ZOOM PARTICIPATION INSTRUCTIONS* Robert Beck, Mayor Pro Tern
Ray Soleno, Council Member

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mary L. Fast, Mayor
Anita Betancourt, Council Member
Matthew Tuttle, Council Member
INVOCATION- Silvia Rios-Estrada, Reedley Police Department Support Team

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
PUBLIC COMMENT - Provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items of interest to the public within the Council's jurisdiction and which are not already on the agenda this evening. It is the policy of the Council not to answer questions impromptu. Concerns or complaints will be referred to the City Manager's office. Speakers should limit their comments to not more than three (3) minutes. No more than ten (1 OJ minutes per issue will be allowed. For items which are on the agenda this evening, members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the Council as each item is brought up for discussion.

NOTICE TO PUBLIC
CONSENT AGENDA items are considered routine and a recommended action for each item is included, and will be voted upon as one item. If a Councilmember has questions, requests additional information, or wishes to comment on an item, the vote should not be taken until after questions have been addressed or comments made, and the public has had an opportunity to comment on the Consent Agenda items. If a Councilmember wishes to have an item considered individually or change the recommended action, then the item should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. A Councilmember's vote in favor of the Consent Agenda is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Motions in favor of the Consent Agenda are deemed to include a motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance on the Consent Agenda. For adoption of ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 1-5) Motion 2"d
---- -----

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 22, 2022 - (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

2. APPROVE MAYOR'S NOMINATION TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION - (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

3. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-016 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE FRESNO COUNTY MUL Tl-JURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND COST SHARING AGREEMENT-(Community Development)

4. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-027 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND AMENDING
DEPARTMENTAL FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES - (Administrative Services) Staff Recommendation: Approve

5. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-028 DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ORDER THE

DISSOLUTION OF ZONES B, D, AND F FROM THE CITY OF REEDLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 - (Engineering)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
ORDINANCES - With respect to the approval of ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council Member that the ordinance be read in full, further reading of the ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council. 2 6. APPROVE ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE PAINTING OF THE TWO DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS
A. AWARD A PAINTING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $541,286 TO WM.

B. SALEH COMPANY FOR COMPLETE PAINT REMOVAL AND

REPAINTING THE TWO ICONIC DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS TO

MATCH THE CURRENT COLORS OF THE WATER TOWERS WITH NO

CHANGES AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO

EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS
B. APPROVE UTILIZING PROJECT CONTINGENCY FUNDS IF ADEQUATE

PROJECT CONTINGENCY FUNDS REMAIN FROM THE TOTAL PROJECT COST TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL WORDS "REEDLEY" ON OPPOSITE

SIDES OF THE THANKS AND ADDITIONAL UP-LIGHTING
C. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-029 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 ADOPTED BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL
$345,414 IN CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021 FOR
REPAINTING THE TWO DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS.

Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Public Works)
Staff Recommendation: Approve items A and C and discussion and consideration of item B.

7. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-003 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REEDLEY ADOPTING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY PER CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL NUMBER 481 ALLOWING THE REEDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ACQUIRE AND USE EQUIPMENT DESIGNATED BY ASSEMBLY BILL NUMBER 481.

Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Police Department)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

WORKSHOP

8. WORKSHOP ON THE PROGRESS OF REPAIRING AND REHABILITATING STREETS AND ROADS WITHIN THE CITY- Engineering

RECEIVE INFORMATION & REPORTS
These items are formal transmittals of information to the Reedley City Council. They are not voted upon by the Reedley City Council. Members of the public who have questions on these items are suggested to call City staff members during regular business hours.

9. QUARTERLY EXPENSE & TRAVEL REPORT FOR ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS - JANUARY 1, 2022 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2022 -Administrative Services

10. REEDLEY'S RIVER CITY THEATRE COMPANY, PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 1 - DECEMBER 31, 2021- Community Services 3 COUNCIL REPORTS

11. BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.

STAFF REPORTS

12. UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing revised agend was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 7'h day of April 2022.

Zoom Participation:

The City Council is encouraging members of the public to observe and participate in the Council meeting virtually, to maximize the safety of all meeting participants. Reasonable efforts will be made to allow written and verbal comments from participants communicating with the host of the virtual meeting. To do so, participants may "raise their hand" during public comment portions of the meeting using the electronic feature on the zoom program, and the City Clerk will inform the Mayor of the participant's desire to provide public comment. Due to the new, untested format of these meetings, the City cannot guarantee that participants who wish to provide public comment, either in writing or verbally, will occur as expected. The "chat" feature on Zoom will not be monitored or used during the meeting.

Members of the public who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at [email protected] at least two (2) hours prior to the start of the meeting to ensure that the comments will be available to the City Council. Please indicate the agenda item number to which the comment pertains. Written comments that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the meeting. A copy of any written comment will be provided to the City Council at the meeting. Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting, but will be included with the meeting minutes.

Dates to Remember:

April 26, 2022- Regular Council Meeting
May 10, 2022-Regular Council Meeting
May 17, 2022-6pm Special Budget Meeting
4 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 22, 2022
A complete audio record oftlte minutes is available at www.reedlev.ca.gov The meeting of Reedley City Council called to order by Mayor Fast at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 22, 2022 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California.

INVOCATION - Pastor Francisco Nunez, Reedley Seventh-day Adventist Church

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Tuttle.

ROLL CALL
Council Members

Present:

Absent:

Anita Betancourt, Ray Soleno, Matthew Tuttle, Mary Fast Robert Beck.

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
Council Member Betancourt motioned, Council Member Tuttle seconded to accept and approve agenda.

Motion unanimously carried.

PRESENTATION

1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFF
Police Chief Garza introduced new police officer and cadet who will both be working patrol at the police department.

PUBLIC COMMENT
None.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 2-8) Motion ____ 2nd ___ _
Council Member Tuttle requested item 4 be removed from Consent for further discussion. Mayor Fast requested item 8 be removed for further discussion.

Council Member Tuttle asked questions about the construction project and if staff knew when the project would start and how long it would take to complete. City Manager, Nicole Zieba stated it would start in approximately four weeks and the project would take approximately four weeks to complete.

Mayor Fast asked for clarification on item 8 from Community Development Director, Rodney Horton prior to the vote. Mr. Horton answered Mayor Fast's questions.

Council Member Tuttle moved, Council Member Soleno seconded to accept, approve and adopt all items listed under the CONSENT AGENDA.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2022 - Approved

3. CONSIDER AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-019 REVISING THE FUND BALANCE POLICY FOR CITY ENTERPRISE FUNDS - Approved

4. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-020 A WARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO MAC GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE MANNING AVENUE SIDEWALKS PROJECT FROM FRANKWOOD A VENUE TO REED A VENUE -Approved

5. ADOPT 5. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-023 AMENDING THE 2021-22 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $44,886 IN THE PROP 68 BOND FUND FOR THE BALANCE OWED FOR THE GEOPLEX NET CLIMBER INSTALLED AT TRIMBLE PARK -Approved REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 22, 2022

6. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-024 AMENDING THE 2021-22 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $97,202 IN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE WATER FUNDS TO PAY FOR DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS-Approved

7. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-025 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING THE ANNUAL CITY STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY- Approved

8. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-026 ACCEPTING THE 2021 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR

THE REEDLEY GENERAL PLAN AND HOUSING ELEMENT AND DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT SAID REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF

PLANNING AND RESEARCH AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-Approved

PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCES- With respect to the approval of ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council Member that the ordinance be read in full, further reading of the ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

9. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN DEPARTMENTAL

FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES IN THE CITYWIDE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE (NO

ACTION)
Assistant City Manager, Paul Melikian explained annually staff reviews all fees contained in the City Master Fee schedule to ensure that services are equitably priced and costs are appropriately recovered.

Public Hearing Opened: 7:32 p.m.

None.

Public Hearing Closed: 7:32 p.m.

10. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 2022-002, GRANTING

AN EXTENSION AND RENEWAL OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF REEDLEY, CALIFORNIA TEMPORARILY PLACING A MORATORIUM ON THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY NEW SMOKE SHOPS/TOBACCO STORES WITHIN THE CITY Community Development Director, Rodney Horton explained in 2021 Council requested that staff research land use restriction and licensing requirements related to smoke shops/tobacco stores, in response to the data presented by Unidos Por Salud and the Health Collaborative about the increase in juveniles vaping. Unidos Por Salud and the Health Collaborative specifically requested Council consider the proximity of smoke shops to schools, parks and health facilities.

The public hearing was advertised in the Mid Valley Times. The item would be granting an extension and renewal of Urgency Ordinance placing a moratorium on the establishment of any new smoke shops/tobacco stores within the city limits while the City's zoning code is under review.

Public Hearing Opened: 7:36 p.m.

Liz Vidrio shared she disagreed with the moratorium on smoke shops and felt it discourages business from coming to Reedley.

Kuiama Gatz shared she also disagrees with the moratorium on smoke shops. By allowing additional smoke shops to come into town it would bring in additional revenue to Reedley.

Public Hearing Closed: 7:42 p.m.

Council Member Soleno moved, Council Member Betancourt seconded to accept, and HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 2022-002, GRANTING AN EXTENSION AND

RENEWAL OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY, 2 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 22, 2022

CALIFORNIA TEMPORARILY PLACING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY NEW

SMOKE SHOPS/TOBACCO STORES WITHIN THE CITY
A YES: Soleno, Betancourt, Tuttle, Fast.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: Beck

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS

11. CONSIDER AND APPROVE ITEMS PERTAINING TO A NEW LIMITED-TERM POSITION OF

ASSISTANT WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISOR
A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-021 ESTABLISHING A REVISED SALARY &

BENEFIT SCHEDULE FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO INCLUDE THE

NEW POSITION OF ASSISTANT WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISOR
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-022 APPROVING THE REVISED MASTER

SALARY TABLE TO INCLUDE THE NEW POSITION OF ASSISTANT WATER

DIVISION SYSTEM - SUPERVISOR AS PART OF THE WATER DIVISION

SUCCESSION PLAN
Public Works Director, Russ Robertson explained maintaining a roster of certified operators in the Water Division is critical to the health, safety and operational efficiency of the water system which all Reedley residents and business owners depend on. Over the course of the last two years, the Water Division has been unable to fill vacant upper level positions due to difficulties in attracting qualified personnel that possess the required State certifications.

Unfortunately, this issue is common to public utilities in California. Currently, lower-level staff do not possess the required certifications, and thus are not positioned to promote to the higher-level position resulting in prolonged vacancies for the Water Systems Specialist II and Senior Water Systems Specialist positions. The vacancies in these positions have created a void in the natural progression of staff and the overall division succession plan. The Water System Supervisor has also notified the City that he plans on retiring in the next two years.

After reviewing available options staff have identified a unique opportunity to recruit for the advanced skill set necessary to ensure a smooth transition of leadership in the division and provide sufficient time for the current supervisor to share detailed institutional knowledge of the City's water system. It is the intent the position will transition upon the retirement of the Water Systems Supervisor and not be backfilled.

Public Comment:

Liz Vidrio stated she liked the idea of backfilling the position and added Sacramento has the best water and would like to bring some of Sacramento's experience here.

Council Member Betancourt moved, Council Member Soleno seconded to accept, and CONSIDER AND

APPROVE ITEMS PERTAINING TO A NEW LIMITED-TERM POSITION OF ASSISTANT WATER

SYSTEM SUPERVISOR
AYES:

NOES:

A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-021 ESTABLISHING A REVISED SALARY &

BENEFIT SCHEDULE FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO INCLUDE THE

NEW POSITION OF ASSISTANT WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISOR
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-022 APPROVING THE REVISED MASTER

SALARY TABLE TO INCLUDE THE NEW POSITION OF ASSISTANT WATER

DIVISION SYSTEM SUPERVISOR AS PART OF THE WATER DIVISION

SUCCESSION PLAN
Betancourt, Soleno, Tuttle, Fast.

None.

ABSTAIN: None .

ABSENT: Beck
3 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 22, 2022

12. CONSIDER AND APPROVE ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE PAINTING OF THE TWO DOWNTOWN

WATER TOWERS
A. A WARD A PAINTING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $541 ,286 TO WM. B.

SALEH COMPANY FOR COMPLETE PAINT REMOVAL AND REPAINTING THE

TWO ICONIC DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER

OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-018 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 ADOPTED BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $371 ,414 IN

CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021 FOR REPAINTING THE TWO

DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS
Public Works Director Russ Robertson stated staff was seeking Council's direction on options to address the poor paint condition on the two downtown water towers. The downtown water towers were originally constructed in 1913 and 1923. Over the course of the last several years staff has noticed that the paint coating is chipping off of the tanks and there is growing concerns of rust and corrosion on the tower's exterior. It is unknown the last time the towers were painted but staff believes that the current paint is at least forty years old.

In 2021 a thorough inspection of the water towers was performed by Utility Service Company. The interior and exterior surfaces of the tank were inspected to assess the condition of the coating system as well as structural integrity, safety conditions and sanitary conditions of the tanks. The result of the inspection was that the paint coating on the water towers is in very poor condition and the towers need to be re-painted. If the towers are not repaired then they will need to be demolished in the not too distant future.

In August 2021 the City Council approved an allocation of $250,000 for the painting of the two towers. This initial request was based on an informal estimate of cost received from one of the vendors based on their past experience and potential issues with the water towers. For the past six months staff has been contacting numerous paint companies throughout California to gather proposals. Initially, four contractors were interested in the project. It was later discovered that the paint on the water towers has lead in it and due to this would have to be chipped off and recoated by hand. When the scope of the project expanded only one contractor submitted a proposal and the others declined.

Currently the water towers only have Reedley painted in black letters on one side of the water towers. Another option would be to add the word Reedley to the opposite side of the tower so that way the word Reedley could be viewed from any direction. Adding the additional words to the towers and new light fixtures to illuminate the new words would be an additional $26,000. The project can be fully funded with grant funds. Due to the cost being much higher than anticipated and the additional option to add extra words and lights to the water towers, staff is bringing forward the information to the City Council for consideration.

Council Member Soleno said he felt it was important to point out this project would be funded through grant funds and not from the City's funds. Council Member Tuttle stated that as a Council they try to stay proactive and felt they needed to do the same with the water towers. Council Member Tuttle stated if possible he would like to see what the cost is for an additional option of adding artwork or a logo on the towers.

Mayor Fast stated she also feels it is important to state this money will not come out of the general fund. She added she has been on council for nineteen years and this is the first time she has seen grant money available for projects like this. Mayor Fast said she did not believe grant money would be available to use for a project like this again in the future and thought Council should take advantage of the available funds and leave the water towers with Reedley written on one side of the tower.

City Manager, Nicole Zieba stated it was important to note that the same coating is not used on the inside of the towers, and the City's water is tested regularly for lead and other substances, and is healthy to drink.

Public Comment:

Kuiama Gatz said originally her comments were going to be that the money could be better spent on sidewalks. After hearing the presentation by Mr. Robertson, she now believes that the City needs to repair the lead paint on the water towers.
4 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 22, 2022
Liz Vidrio stated the funds should be used to fix the towers. The water towers are the favorite part of Reedley and she would hate to see them tom down. Ms. Vidrio said she would love to see a nice mural on the towers.

Susan Chapman stated if you asked the community the water towers are historic and important to Reedley. Due to this they have to be repaired. Ms. Chapman said due to the rising cost of inflation she would suggest getting the water towers fixed sooner rather than later and inquired if there was going to be more bidders for the process.

City Manager, Nicole Zieba explained the bid is only good for thirty days. It also requires specialized equipment to be able to climb the water towers and that's why none of the local contractors bid on the project. The staff had to reach out to the contractors and find out who was specialized and certified to be able to complete a project on the water towers. Ms. Zieba stated she does not believe if the project is put out to bid again if they will receive any more bids.

Council Member Tuttle said he liked the idea brought up by Liz Vidrio. Mr. Robertson said the climbers who paint the water towers have to be certified to do so, and finding a local artist who is interested in donating their art and is also certified to climb water towers might be challenging.

Mayor Fast moved adding she would like the water towers to stay identical to the way they are currently.

Council Member Betancourt seconded to accept, and AW ARD A PAINTING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $595,414 TO WM. B. SALEH COMPANY FOR COMPLETE PAINT REMOVAL AND

REPAINTING THE TWO ICONIC DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS AND AUTHORIZE CITY

MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS
A YES: Fast, Betancourt.

NOES: Soleno, Tuttle.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: Beck.

Motion failed due to lack of majority
Council Member Soleno moved adding he would like to add the additional Reedley and lighting for $26,000 Council Member Tuttle seconded to accept, and AWARD A PAINTING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $621,414 TO WM. B. SALEH COMPANY FOR COMPLETE PAINT REMOVAL AND REPAINTING THE TWO ICONIC

DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL

RELATED DOCUMENTS
A YES: Soleno, Tuttle.

NOES: Fast, Betancourt.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: Beck.

Motion failed due to lack of majority
Council Member Tuttle moved, Mayor Fast seconded to bring item back before Council at the next meeting.

A YES: Tuttle, Fast, Betancourt.

NOES: Soleno.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: Beck.

Motion passed-Item will be brought back at next Council meeting.

13. REEDLEY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24,2022

COUNCIL REPORTS

14. BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.
5 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - March 22, 2022
Council Member Tuttle:
• Discussed the upcoming Health & Fitness Expo and Walk and Run event Mayor Fast
• Attended the Senior lunch

STAFF REPORTS

15. UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

City Manager, Nicole Zieba
• Provided a Covid update
Police Chief, Jose Garza
• Mentioned A TM skimmers have been located locally and reminded everyone to pay extra attention when using credit card machines

CLOSED SESSION

16. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
Conference with Labor Negotiators
Agency designated representative: City Attorney
Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
Public Comment:

None.

City Attorney, Laurie Avedisian-Favini reported that no action was taken in closed session.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Fast adjourned the regular meeting at 8:57 p.m.

Mayor Mary Fast
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
6 DATE: April 12, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: z_ ----
TITLE: APPROVE MAYOR'S NOMINATION TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE

COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood R_dtJ City Clerk
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba I /\ 1 /
City Manager V r

RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the Reedley City Council approve Mayor Fast's nomination to fill a vacancy on the Community Services Commission. After review of the application by Mayor Fast, she is recommending the appointment to the commission.

BACKGROUND
The position available on the Community Services Commission is due to a term expiration. The open position was advertised in the Mid Valley Times. Mayor Fast has interviewed the applicant and is recommending that Jenny Peters be approved to sit on the Community Services Commission.

The Community Services Commission term is three (3) year term. This appointment will have a term expiration of February 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
No Fiscal Impact

ATTACHMENTS
One (1) application

Page 1 of 1 ends

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMISSION/COMMITTEE APPLICATION FORM
I hereby request that I be considered for appointment to the following Commission or Committee:

PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK

CHECK ONE ONLY- USE SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR EACH COMMISSION •
•
•
•
NAME:

Airport Commission
Community Services Commission
(Must reside within City limits)
Planning Commission
(Must reside within City limits)
Traffic Safety Commission
(Must reside within City limits)
Streetscape Maintenance Committee
(Must be a business owner within downtown streetscape
maintenance district)
Jenny Peters
HOME ADDRESS:

Reedley, CA 93654
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from above):

EMAIL ADDRESS (if applicable): ____________________ _
RESIDENT OF REEDLEY FOR 26 YEARS.

EMPLOYED BY: Reedley College
DATE: 3/21/22 SIGNATURE: _____;:M~ · ------r.'. i;,..._~--~---~- ----- (/ (:\dd1tionJI 111fom1at1on ts rcqucsh:d on the hack ofthts fonnl Please give a brief overview of any qualifications you might have that would be beneficial to the Commission you have chosen to serve on.

I have worked and served in the community of Reedley in many different ways over the twenty six years that I have lived in here. For many years I worked as the Site Coordinator for the After School Program at T.L. Reed and together our team provided services for students after school that included everything from homework assitance, to community involvement to educational field excursions. 1 have also served on various community boards over the years, including the Reedley Marlins and the Reedley Aquatics Board, in addition to multiple committees for local events for Redeemers Church or Reedley College. Finally, I have been blessed to have been asked to help with different events like the Reedley Lions Club Speech Competition, The Miss Reedley Pageant (many years ago), the Reedley Street Faire, and the Greater Reedley Chamber of Commerce Awards events.

I love the community I live in, and I am always eager to help out in any way that I can. Now that we are a few months away from becoming "empty-nesters" I know that I will have even more time on my hands and I am looking forward to filling that time getting more involved in projects and events that matter to Reedley. Thank you for considering my application.

Please note that the Mayor, or his designee, will be contacting you to set up a one-on-one interview.

DATE: April 12, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 3 - =----
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-016 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE FRESNO COUNTY MUL TlJURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND COST SHARING

AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED: Rodney L. Horta~~
Community Devefopment Director
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba I _ /
City Manager 1/Y

RECOMMENDATION
Approve and authorize the City's participation in the Fresno County Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element Update and Cost Sharing Agreement between the Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG), the City of Reedley, and other participating jurisdictions in Fresno County for a Sixth Cycle Housing Element Update.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Fresno COG, in cooperation with other participating jurisdictions in Fresno County, including the City of Reedley, is preparing to launch a Sixth Cycle to the Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element. The City of Reedley is currently a participating jurisdiction of the existing Fifth Cycle.

The multi-jurisdictional effort allows for housing needs to be addressed at the regional level rather than just at the local level. Furthermore, a joint effort between participating cities will result in significant cost savings as it pertains to the preparation of the housing element update.

BACKGROUND
General Plan Discussion
Government Code Section 65300 requires California cities and counties to adopt and maintain a General Plan with a minimum of eight mandatory elements which includes Housing; Land Use; Circulation; Conservation; Open Space; Noise; Safety; and more recently Environmental Justice.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Housing Element Discussion
Additionally, California requires the Housing Element be updated every eight years. The Housing Element must identify the following:

1. An existing and projected housing needs assessment to ensure adequate housing capacity exists for all economic segments of the community.

2. While the Housing Element does not require cities to build additional housing, it does call for cities to remove obstacles to future development and plan for a diversity of housing through revisions to the zoning code and land use policy.

3. This planning accounts for a Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) number, which a minimum number of new homes across income levels that a city must plan to accommodate through its Housing Element. Although it is still early, Reedley's proposed RHNA number is currently 1,463 housing units, accounting for both singleand multi-family dwelling units.

After the analysis is completed, community hearings are held, and the document has been drafted, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) reviews and certifies the Housing Element to ensure compliance with State law. HCD is aware of and encourages multi-jurisdictional efforts, such as what is proposed for Council's consideration.

Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element Discussion
The City of Reedley, with other participating jurisdictions within Fresno County and in coordination with Fresno COG, participated in the Fifth Cycle (2015-2023) Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element. The Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element was a regional housing document that effectively acted as the State-mandated housing element for all participating jurisdictions.

This effort, accomplished in 2015-2016, was a unique, award-winning collaborative effort on the part of all the local jurisdictions involved to accomplish this task. At that time, participating jurisdictions included the County of Fresno, Clovis, Coalinga, Fowler, Huron, Kerman, Kingsburg, Mendota, Parlier, Reedley, San Joaquin, Sanger, and Selma.

The Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element was a single document, made up of two sections:
• The main body, which described demographics, housing needs, resources, and constraints at a regional level and included goals and policies common to all participating jurisdictions; and
• Individual appendices, which contained details for each jurisdiction (i.e., sites inventory, governmental constraints, evaluation of the existing Housing Element) and individual implementation programs for the City of Reedley.

In 2015, each city spent an average of $25,000-$50,000 on the Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element, and cost savings were gained with utilizing planning services provided by Fresno COG.

However, recent State legislation and case law have made the undertaking of this document much more costly in terms of staff time and increased need for analysis to comply with new requirements. Estimates to complete the Housing Element in-house would require the hiring of a consultant, accompanying public hearings, outreach, sites inventory, and inclusion of current housing law in ordinance updates. If the City of Reedley chose not to participate in a Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element for the sixth cycle, the estimate for this work would be a minimum of $250,000. Current estimates for each smaller jurisdiction for this Sixth Cycle

Page 2 of 3 ends

Housing Element Update is expected not to exceed $121,296.

Staff is recommending that because of the cost savings and necessary staffing time required to perform the update, the City of Reedley should participate in the Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element process. Should the City Council approve the City of Reedley's participation in this effort, a Cost Sharing Agreement to be signed by all participating jurisdictions and Fresno COG, with an authorization to approve a $10,000 initial deposit, is being brought to the City Council for review and approval prior to the April 28, 2022, deadline.

FISCAL IMPACT
The initial deposit required by Fresno COG is $10,000 from the City, which is already accounted for in the current budget. Additionally, the City will be responsible for reimbursing Fresno COG for its part of the project.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
On February 22, 2022, City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-006 amending the 2021 - 2022 adopted budget appropriating $1,147,224 in multiple City funds for various operating programs, capital projects, and fund transfer which included $10,000 for the deposit to Fresno COG.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-016

2. Cost Sharing Arrangement
Motion: ____ _
Second: -----

Page 3 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-016

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE FRESNO COUNTY MULTI-JURSDICTIONAL

HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND COST SHARING AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65588 requires local agencies to review and revise the Housing Elements to their comprehensive General Plan in compliance with Section 65580 through 65589, Chapter 1143, Article 10.6, and
WHEREAS, the Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG) is a Joint Powers agency created by the fifteen incorporated cities in Fresno County and the County of Fresno, pursuant to Government Code Sections 6500 et. Seq., and
WHEREAS, the local government agencies in Fresno County have requested FCOG to hire a consultant to perform a coordinated update to the housing element of each local agency's General Plan at no cost to FCOG, and WHEREAS, FCOG convened a Project Development Team (PDT) consisting of the local member agencies, to review the Request for Proposal, evaluate bids, select a consultant, develop a cost sharing arrangement and make a recommendation to the FCOG board to hire the consultant, and WHEREAS, the cost sharing arrangement includes the cost of the consultant and $75,000 to cover FCOG administration, and
WHEREAS, the total cost is not expected to exceed $121,296, and WHEREAS, each participating member agency agrees to reimburse FCOG for the cost of the Fresno County Multijurisdictional Housing Element Study in accordance with the cost sharing arrangement attached herein, and
WHEREAS, time is of the essence and each participating member agency agrees to facilitate the flow of information to the consultant to provide a timely report.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Reedley City Council hereby adopts the Fresno County Multijurisdictional Housing Element Cost Sharing Agreement and agrees to participate in the study and reimburse FCOG for actual costs incurred.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved the 12th day of April, 2022, in the City of Reedley, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mary L. Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Attachment:

Exhibit A: Fresno County Multi-jurisdictional Housing Element Cost Sharing Arrangement 6th Cycle MJHE Cost Sharing Arrangement

TOTAL COST
FCOG Admin Consultant Cost (Consultant Cost+
FCOG Admin)
Clovis N/A N/A N/A
County $ 5,000 $ 144,091 $ 149,091
Fresno* $ 5,000 $ 238,992 $ 243,992
Coalinga $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Firebaugh $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Fowler $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Huron $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Kerman $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Kingsburg $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Mendota $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Orange Cove $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Parlier $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Reedley $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Sanger* $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
San Joaquin $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
Selma $ 5,000 $ 116,296 $ 121,296
The totals above are amounts not to exceed by participating jurisdiction within the proposed consultant contract, and assume that an initial study and negative declaration will be prepared for each jurisdiction. If during the course of the project it is determined that an addendum to the jurisdiction's general plan EIR is more appropriate, rather than an initial study and negative declaration, the not to exceed amount will be reduced accordingly.
*Fresno and Sanger City Councils taking action on final recommendation to participate in the MJHE in April.

DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
1:8J Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D ClosedSession
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ii
April 12, 2022
ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-027 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND

AMENDING DEPARTMENTAL FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manager~
Nicole R. Zieba. City Manager ~

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt resolution 2022-27 approving proposed amendments to certain Departmental fees and charges in the Citywide Master Fee Schedule as presented in the attached fee schedule, to take effect July 1, 2022.

BACKGROUND
A public hearing including a full presentation of proposed amendments to certain Departmental fees and charges in the Citywide Master Fee Schedule was held on March 22, 2022. A public hearing notice was published in the Reedley Exponent on March 10, 2022. A full copy of the staff report highlighting proposed amendments to certain Departmental fees and charges is attached for reference.

Once adopted, the new fee schedule will be posted to the City website, with specific fee or text changes incorporated into department literature and communications as necessary.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2022-27
Exhibit 'A' Master Fee Schedule effective July 1, 2022
Public Hearing Staff Report Dated March 22, 2022
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-027

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND

AMENDING DEPARTMENTAL FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES
WHEREAS, City staff review the City Master Fee Schedule on an annual basis to ensure the City is maintaining financial control, equitably pricing services and offerings, and identifying core programs, facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, Critical to this undertaking is the support and buy-in of elected officials, advisory boards, staff and, most importantly, of citizens; and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held on March 22, 2022 at 7 :00 pm at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting regarding proposed additions or revisions to certain fees in the City Master Fee Schedule; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley has reviewed and considered the proposed amendments to the Citywide Master Fee Schedule.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Reedley that the Master Fee Schedule as provided with this resolution as Exhibit "A" shall be the amended charges for services and the schedule shall go into effect July 1, 2022.

This foregoing resolution is hereby adopted this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Mary L. Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Exhibit - A
City of Reedley

ADOPTED
Master Fee Schedule
Last Revised April 12, 2022 by Resolution No. 2022-027
Table of Contents
Administrative Services Department
Business License ............................ ........... .. .... ......... .... ........................ .. ................................. 1 Utilites .. ........................................... ...... ... .. ... .. .. ..... ... ... .. ....... ....... ........... .. ...... ......................... 1 Event Permits ................. ... ................................................................................. ...... ..... ... ... ..... 1 Other ................ ............. .................................. .. ... ..... .. ........................................... ... ... ........... . 1 All Departments Miscellaneous Fees ................................. ....... ........ ........ .. ....... ... ....... ............ 1 Fire Department
Plan Check/Inspection ... .. ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ...... ..... ... .. ............... .. .. .... .... .... .................................. 2 Commercial Sprinkler System .. .... .. ................ .................... ......... .. .. ........... .... .... ...................... 2 Underground System ... .. .. ........................ .. ........................ .......... ..... .... ... .. ..... ..... ..... ............... 2 Overhead Systems .... ...... ... ...... ......... ........ .. ... ... ..... ... ............ ... .. ..... .. ..... ....................... .......... . 2 Other ............................... .. .... .... ................. ............. ......................... ......... .. ... .... .... .................. 2 Residential Occupancy Inspection Program R-2 ... ............... ............. .... .. ................................. 2 Community Services Department
Veterans Banner Program .. ........................ ...... .......................... ... ...... ... ... ..... .. ...... .................. 3 Camacho Park Fees/Deposits ................................. .......... .......................................... ....... .... .. 3 Sports Park Fees/Deposits ................ .............. ...... ...... .. .. ....................... ....... ........................... 3 Mueller Park .. ............... ................ ... ...... ... .. ....... ..... .... .............. .. .................... .... ...... ................ 3 Park Fees and Deposits .......................................................................................... .... ....... .... . .4 Special Events Fees- All Facilities ................... ...... ...... ............... ....................................... ...... .4 Community Center .. .... .... .... ... .. .. ... .... ................. .... .. ........... ..... .. ...... ... ... ......... ......................... 5 Youth Sports ...................... .............................................. .................................... .. ... .. ... ..... .... . 6 Adult Sports ... ... ... ......... .. .... .. ..... ... .................... .. ..... .. ... ..... .. ..... ... ... ...... .. ................................. 6 Enrichments ...... ....... ... ... .............. .... ... ... ... ...... .. ..... .. .. .. ...... ..... ........ ...... ... .... ............................ 7 Classes ..................... .. ................... .................. ..................... ...... ..................... .... .. ..... ............. 7 Pre School/Pre Kindergarten ..... .... ...................................... ........... ...... .. ..................... ............. 7 Summer Aquatics ... ........................... ..... ...... ... .............. ........... ...... ...... ............ .............. .... ...... 8 Year-Round Aquatics .. ... ............. ..... ...... ........... .......... ............... ... ............................... ............ 8 Municipal Airport ... ...... .. .... ... .... .. .... ....... ... ... ... ... .......... ............................................................. 9 Community Development Department
Building Fees ... ............. ...... .................... ....... .............. ... ... .... .. .. ... ........ .... .. ..... .... ... ... .... ........ 10 Water Meter Pricing .... .. ......... ... ......... ... ..... ... ............ .. ...... .... .... ... ...................... ...... .. .... ........ 13 Grading Plan Review and Permitting Fees ... .. .. ... ... ...... ... ........ .... ...... ... .. ... ..... ... ... .......... .... .... 13 Planning Fees ..... ..... ... ... .............. .............. ... ........... ........... .. ... ...... ... ... ............. ...... ...... ..... ... . 14 Document Fees .... ...... .... ... ..... ....................... .................................. ................ ... .................... 15 Developer Impact Fee (Transportation Facilities) ...... .. ...... ......... .. ... ... .... ................................ 16 Developer Impact Fee (Law Enforcement Facilities) ................ ... .......................... ................. 16 Developer Impact Fee (Fire Facilities) ............... .......... .... .. ........ ... ...... ...... ...... ........ ... .. ...... ... .. 17 Developer Impact Fee (General Government Facilities) ..... ... ...... .. ... ... ... .... .... .... ................ .... 17 Developer Impact Fee (Storm Drain Facilities) ...... ... .. .. .. ............. .. ... ......... ......... ..... ..... .......... 18 Developer Impact Fee (Wastewater Facilities) ...... .. .......... .. .. ... .......... ... .... .... ... ..... .. ... ... ... .... .. 18 Developer Impact Fee (Water Facilities) .. ... .... .. ..... .. .. .... .. ...... .... .. ... ..... ... .. .... ........... .............. 19 Developer Impact Fee (Park and Recreational Facilities) .... ... .... ............ ... ... .. .. .... ... .... .... .. .... . 19 Engineering Department
Permit Issuance Fees .................................... .... ............................................. ... .................... 20 Police Department
Report Production and Document Fees ................................ ............................ .. ........ ...... .. ... 21 Permit and License Fees ...... ............... ... ...................... ................ .. ... ...... ..... ... .. ..................... 21 Police Service Fees ................................................... ............................. .. .... ... ................. ... .. 21 Animal Control Fees ... .... .... ... .... .. ... .. .................... .. ...... .... ................ ...... ........................... .... . 21 Public Works Department -Wastewater Service Rates
Flat Rate Customers ....... ........ .. .......................................................... ...... ...... .................... ... 22 Metered Customers ..... .. .. .... ... ..... .... ................... ........................................................ ............ 22 Category I Industrial .. .. ... .... ....... ... ..... ... ..... ............................................................................. 22 Industrial Pre-Treatment Program ............................. .. ........................................................... 22 Service Call Outs .......................................................................... ....... ....... .. .... .... ...... ........... 22 Laboratory Fees ............................................................ ....... ... ............... ..... ..... ...................... 22 Winter Water Average for Accounts ................................................................... .... .. .... .......... 23 Public Works Department - Water Service Rates
Residential Water Rate Structure ......................................................................... ... ..... .......... 24 Non Residential Water Rate Structure ................. ..... ................................... ... ...... .................. 24 Irrigation Water Rate Structure .. ... ... ........................................................................... ............ 24 Temporary Construction Water ................................................... .. ......................................... 25 Dedicated Fire Protection Service Line Charge .. .................................... ...... .. ................... ..... 25 Service Call-Outs ....................... .. ....................................... .................................. ...... ...... ..... 25 Residential & Non- Residential Drought Rate Structure ................................................ .. .. .. .... 25 Irrigation Drought Rate Structure .. ... ... ................. .. ... ............. ... ............ .. ................................ 25 Resolution 2022-027 ......... ....... ....... ... ........ ............ ... ... .............. ............................................. 26 Special Note:

Many of the fees shown in this schedule have a resolution number printed to the right of the amount that indicates the last time that a particular fee description (also known as a 'text' change) or fee amount was amended. This practice began in 2012, therefore resolutions (amendments) before that year are not shown. A copy of the resolution and corresponding staff report for a particular fee or group of fees can be obtained by contacting the City Clerk or Administrative Services Department at (559) 637-4200.

City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Administrative Services Department
Business License:

Business License Annual Fee
Business License Annual Renewal Fee
Business License Application Fee
Business License Change of Location Only
SB-1186 Disability Access Fee/ annual/ per license
Business License Additional Decal - Yard Service
Business License Additional Decal - Mobile Food Vendors Business License Report Listing / per request
Taxi Cab Application
Taxi Cab Inspection Service I per year/ per unit
Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area 'Streetscape' Fee/ per month / per business/ billed quarterly
Discounted 'Streetscape' Annual Fee ($24.00 value)
Utilities:

Utility Account Deposit
Utility Account Deposit - Insufficient ID and Financial Risk Utility Application Fee (Water-Sewer-Disposal)
Utility Application Fee - Construction Water
Utility Late Fee Service Charge
Utility Disconnect Service Charge (Non-Payment only)
Account termination, water shut-off, trash cans removed ..... Account holder is also responsible for late fee and NSF fees Event Permits:

Yard Sales (1-3 Days)/ per event/ max 2 per year/ per address Non-Profit Events (Car Washes, Sidewalk Sales, Etc.) - Per Event Fireworks Applications / per event
Fireworks Stand Security Deposit Fee
Bingo Application and/or Renewal/ per event
Other:

Non-Sufficient Funds Fee
Collections Account Service Fee
Check Replacement Fee (Recipient Requested Stop Pymt)
Late Fee/ any billed item except utilities (Assessed 30 days from invoice Transportation Permit Fee
Telephone Credit Card Payment Convenience Fee/ Per Transaction All Departments - Miscellaneous Fees:

Color Photocopies (Standard or Legal Size)
0 - 2 copies
3 -10 copies
11 and over
Black & White Photocopies (Standard or Legal Size)
O - 2 copies
3 - 10 copies
11 and over
Digital copies of files
* It is the policy of the City not to provide photocopy services for non-City documents. $
Fee

75.00 25.00
100.00

25.00 4.00

10.00 40.00

15.00 100.00

75.00 16.50
174.00
Equal to Three Months
Average Utility Bill
Equal to Four Months
Average Utility Bill
$ 30.00
$

10.00 25.00
100.00**

10.00 25.00
100.00

50.00 50.00
$ 35.00

35.00 30.00

15.00 15.00

4.00 $ 0.50

5.00 5.00 + 0.50 each after
No charge

1.00 flat fee

1.00 + 0.10 each after

15.00 ** The above rates will not apply to certain types of specialized City documents for which separate charges have been established.

Page 1 of 25 ends

Resolution No.
2014-026
2014-026
2014-026
2014-026
2012-021
2018-037
2020-026
2018-037
2018-037
2016-037
2012-021
2014-026
2013-036
2013-036
2018-037
2014-026
·-
·-·-
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Fire Department
Plan Check/ Inspection:

Annual Fire Inspection O - 5000 Sq. Ft.

Annual Fire Inspection 5001 - Up Sq. Ft.

Pre-Plan Development
Re-Inspection
Haz-Mat Inspection/Permit
Wet System Fire Hood/Duct Plan Check
Wet System Fire Hood/Duct Inspection
Dry System (Halon, CO2) Plan Check
Dry System (Halon, CO2) Inspection
Fire Alarm Plan Check
Fire Alarm System Inspection
Residential Sprinkler Plan Check/ per unit
Residential Sprinkler Inspection/ per unit
Commercial Sprinkler System:

Plan Check/System Inspection Base Fee
0-25 Heads
26-62 Heads
63-100 Heads
101-137 Heads
138-175 Heads
176-212 Heads
213-250 Heads
251-287 Heads
288-325 Heads
326-362 Heads
363-400 Heads
400+ Heads / per head
Underground Systems:

Flush and Pressure Check
Thrust Block Inspection
Overhead Systems:

Pressure Check
Other:

Fee
$
$
Fire Pump $
Medical Gas System
Commercial Life Safety Plan Check
Fire Flow Test (Sprinkler Sys or Hydrant
Fireworks Stand Inspections (up to 10 lnsp. each)
Public Fireworks Display Permit/Inspection/Coverage
Public Fair/Carnival Event
Christmas Tree Lot
Illegal Burn Incident (one Engine)
Spray Booth Plan Review and Inspection
State Mandated Fire Inspection (Jail, Hospital, School) Independent Inspection Fee
Emergency Fire Protection Stand-by Fee/ per hour
Code Enforcement Vehicle Tow Fee
Late Fee/ any billed item (Assessed 30 days from invoice date) Public Safety Alarms - Response to False Alarm One Response each Fiscal Second Response or more each Fiscal Year
Public Safety Training - Per Hour
Fire Incident Report
Residential Occupancy Inspection Program R-2 (3 or more units) 3-5 Units $
6-15 Units
16-25 Units
26-60 Units

Page 2 of 25 ends

86.00 124.00

86.00 48.00
124.00
162.00

86.00 162.00

86.00 248.00

38.00 57.00

76.00 95.00
114.00
133.00
152.00
171 .00
190.00
209.00
228.00

0.57 86.00

86.00 86.00
124.00

86.00 25% of Permit
124.00
124.00
1,068.00
200.00

86.00 236.00
238.00
124.00
Actual Cost
236.00
150.00

15.00 236.00

86.00 20.00
124.00
162.00
200.00
238.00
Resolution No.
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2013-036
2015-031
2022-027
2022-027
2018-037
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
·-·-
• ·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Veterans Banner Program Fee Resolution No.

Program Cost (inclusive of banner cost, hanging, removing , and all associated items)
NEW Annual Rehanging Fee/ per banner
Camacho Park Fees/Deposits*:

DEPOSITS:

Field per field per day
Bases per field per day
Chalker per day
Snack Bar per day
FEES:

Field (1-200 People) per field per day
Entire Park
1-100 people
101-200 people
Field Preparation per field per day
Lights (per hour) per field
Snack Bar Nonprofit, Reedley-based youth sports orgs / per season or every six months
Snack Bar/ per hour
Clean Up per hour
Bases per field per day
Chalker per day
Sports Park Fees/Deposits*:

DEPOSITS:

Fields per field per day
Snack Bar per day
Bases per field per day
Chalker per day
FEES:

Each Field (1-200 People) per field per day
Lights per hour per field
Snack Bar Nonprofit, Reedley-based youth sports orgs / per season or every six months
Snack Bar/ per hour
Pavilion for 4 hours/ Minimum Rental
Entire Field, Pavilion & Snack Bar for 8 hours
Clean Up / per hour
Bases per field per day
Chalker per day
Mueller Park*:

Basketball Courts
DEPOSITS:
1-200 people
FEES:
1-200 people for 4 hours
(Special Event fees apply to 200 and over)
Clean Up - per hour
$
$
$
$
$
250.00

40.00 100.00

50.00 50.00
225.00

59.00 N/A
N/A

29.00 29.00

24.00 320.00

24.00 14.00

14.00 100.00
225.00

50.00 50.00

29.00 29.00
320.00

24.00 21 .00

46.00 34.00

14.00 14.00
110.00

17.00 34.00
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2018-037
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2012-02 1
2012-021
2016-037
2012-02 1
2022-027
2022-027
2018-037
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
* Per resolution No. 2012-020, Reedley youth sports non-profit groups who meet qualifications will receive an 80% sponsorship from the City on adopted fees for parks and facilities rentals.

Page 3 of 25 ends

·-·-. ---- · -
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Park Fees and Deposits*: Fee Resolution No.

DEPOSITS:
1-100 People
101-200 People
FEES:

Band Shell for 4 hours
Pavilion for 4 hours
Picnic Area for 4 hours
Whole Park for 4 hours
Clean up per hour
Citizens Park Snack Bar per hour
Snack Bar for NonProfit, Reedley-based youth sports organizations - per BARRICADES:

Fees (includes delivery and pickup) each
Portable Bleachers: (Includes delivery and pickup) per set Bounce House - each
ENTRY FEES: Reedley Beach & Cricket Hollow
Daily Entry / per car
Season Pass / one entry per day
Bus Entry / per bus
Mobile Vendor / per day
Special Event Fees - All Facilities:**
Application Processing Fee
Facilities Impact Fee:
201 - 500 people
501 - 800 people
801 - 1000 people
1001 - 1300 people
1301 - 1500 people
1501 - 1800 people
1801 - 2000 people
2001 - 3000 people
3001 + people
$
$

50.00 100.00
21 .00
21 .00
21 .00

61.00 34.00

24.00 320.00

3.00 111 .00

29.00 6.00

36.00 36.00

26.00 49.00
242.00
366.00
445.00
561 .00
642.00
766.00
838.00
1,248.00
1,824.00
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2018-037
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2018-037
2018-037
2018-037
2018-037
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
* Per resolution No. 2012-020, Reedley youth sports non-profit groups who meet qualifications will receive an 80% sponsorship from the City on adopted fees for parks and facilities rentals . ** Non-profit, Reedley-based organizations which have obtained a valid 501 ©(3) or 501 ©(4) designation from the Internal Revenue Service are exempt from Special Event Fees.

Page 4 of 25 ends

·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Comm unity Center*: Fee Resolution No.

Processing Fee
Floor Damage
Facilities Impact Fee**
Deposits:

Standard
California Room Fees: 4 Hour Minimum Rental
1-200 people
201-400 people
Decorating Time Fee
Kitchen (catering only)
Small Meeting Rooms: Redwood Room, Sierra Room, Kings River, Senior Fees:

Deposit:

Senior Patio: **
Deposit:

Set up and Clean Up Fee
Miscellanous Fees:

Sound System Rental
Movie Screen Rental
Security Deposit - Sound System & Movie Screen
Maintenance Fee - After hours & weekends / per hour
- Applies to large events that use multiple rooms and are open to the public.

Marquee Rental
$ 64.00

75.00 156.00
$ 500.00
155.00
173.00

33.00 37.00

47.00 250.00

36.00 75.00

25.00 200.00

36.00 $5.00/Day I $20.00
Minimum
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2020-026
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2020-026
2022-027
2022-027
201 9-041
* Per resolution No. 2012-020, Reedley youth sports non-profit groups who meet qualifications will receive an 80% sponsorship from the City on adopted fees for parks and facilities rentals.

Page 5 of 25 ends

·-
·-
·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Youth Sports:

Mini Ball, T-Ball, Minors Baseball
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Tiny Tots Baseball
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Flag Football
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Tiny Tots Flag Football
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Jr. Cager Basketball
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Tiny Tots Basketball
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Volleyball
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Cross Country
Early Registration
Regular Registration
Late Registration
Jr. Giants
Drop In Sports Clinics
Adult Sports
Softball
Regular Registration/ per team
Late Registration / per team
Security Deposit (Non Refundable)
Basketball
Regular Registration/ per team
Late Registration / per team
Security Deposit (Non-Refundable)
Flag Football
Regular Registration/ per team
Late Registration / per team
Security Deposit (Non-Refundable)
Volleyball
Regular Registration/ per team
Late Registration / per team
Security Deposit (Non-Refundable)
$
$
$

Page 6 of 25 ends

Fee

55.00 62.00

85.00 55.00

62.00 85.00

55.00 62.00

85.00 55.00

62.00 85.00

55.00 62.00

85.00 55.00

62.00 85.00

55.00 62.00

85.00 55.00

62.00 85.00
Free Program

8. 00/per day
435.00
485.00
100.00
370.00
420.00
100.00
350.00
400.00
100.00
350.00
400.00
100.00
Resolution No.
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
202 1-028
2020-026
2020-026
2016-037
2020-026
2020-026
2016-037
2020-026
2020-026
2020-026
2021 -028
202 1-028
202 1-028
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Enrichments:

Easter Day Camp
7:45am - 5:15pm
Holiday Day Camp
7:45am - 5: 15pm (Full week discount. For weeks with holidays, only daily rate available.)
Seasonal Camps Jr. Leader Fee
Parents Night (4 hours of Childcare)
Halloween Carnival
Children under 2 Years
Adults
Kids (2-12)
Easter Carnival
Children under 2 Years
Fiesta Race
Children's Races
Adult Early Registration
Adult Late Registration
Princess Show
Ticket price in advance
Ticket price at the door
Movie Night
Premier Seating
General Seating
Classes:

Tumbling
Hip Hop
Cheer
Tai Chi
CPR & First Aid
Babysitting
Paint Night (General Public)
Paint Night (Seniors)
Craft Class (General Public -price varies depending upon the cost of supplies)
Craft Class (Seniors -price varies depending upon the cost of supplies) Pre-School/ Pre-Kindergarten:

Preschool (monthly)
Late Fee
PreKindergarten (monthly)
Late Fee
Late Pick-up Fee/ per every five minutes late
Drop in Class (ages 3-4) July-August/ per day

Page 7 of 25 ends

$
$
$
Fee
21 .00 Day/Child
116.00/Session

21.00 Day/Child

96.00/Week

3.00/Day

12.00 Free
Free

3.00 Free

8.00 25.00

35.00 18.00

25.00 15.00

10.00 80.00/Session

80. 00/Session

80. 00/Sessi on

40.00/Month

80.00 45.00

20.00 - 25.00

12.00 - 15.00

20.00 - 30.00

10.00 -15.00
113.00

30.00 173.00

30.00 5.00

15.00 Resolution No.
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2020-026
2021-028
2020-026
2019-041
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2021-028
2021-028
2020-026
2019-041
2018-037
2018-037
2022-027
2018-037
2022-027
2022-027
2021-028
2021 -028
2021-028
2020-026
2021-028
2020-026
2020-026
2022-027
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Summer Aquatics:

Recreational Swimming
17 and under
Adults (18-54)
Seniors
Swim Lessons
Group Lessons (10- 1/2 hour lessons)
Semi-Private Lessons
Private Lessons (10- 1/2 hour lessons)
Jr. Lifeguard Class
Year Round Aquatics:

Lap Swim / per visit
Swim Pass / 10 visits
Swim Pass / 20 visits
Lap Swim Card Replacement
Water Aerobics / per month
Fee
$
$

Page 8 of 25 ends

3.75 4.25

3.75 62.00

89.00 105.00

61.00 3.25

32.50 65.00

2.25 34.00
Resolution No.
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Services Department
Municipal Airport:

Fees and Policies
No person shall park any aircraft on the Reedley Municipal Airport or at any hangars or facilities located thereon, nor shall use the facilities of the Reedley Municipal Airport unless arrangements therefore have been made in accordance with the schedule of rates and charges referred to herein, or unless contractual arrangements therefore have been made with the City. No person Aircraft Parking
Daily rates shall apply to commercial aircraft parked in excess of eight hours and to non-commercial aircraft parked in excess of 24 hours. Aircraft of lessees parked on their leased premises and aircraft owned and operated by the Federal Government are excluded. Payment for monthly reserved parking space is due and payable in advance for each calendar month. Payment of the Tiedowns
Transient (daily)
Monthly
Shade cover (monthly)
T-Hangars (monthly)
Old (half size)
Old (full size)
New (1000-1199 sq ft)
New (1200-1399 sq ft)
New ( 1400-1599 sq ft)
Late Fee/ per invoice if not paid 30 days after initial date of invoice* * The 15% late fee is non-compounding.

Automobile Parking:

Daily
Monthly
Designated areas for privately-owned hangars shall be made available by the Airport Manager for the location of hangars. The model and type of hangar shall be approved by the Airport Manager. Individual land leases for the construction of hangars by individuals or firms shall be permitted and are to be coordinated by the Airport Manager.

Payment:

For standard tiedowns , the initial rent shall include first month's rent, plus deposit equal to one month's rent. For all T-Hangars , initial payment shall include first month's rent and deposit equal to one month's rent plus a $100 cleaning deposit. Thereafter, monthly rent shall be due and payable in advance.

Commercial Operator Fees:

All non-based commercial operators, except operators of transient aerial applicator aircraft, shall pay a basic operator's fee of $40.00 per calendar month, in advance, plus an additional charge of $20.00 per month for each aircraft used by said operators, if any, with a gross weight from 1 through 6,000 pounds, and an additional charge of $5.00 per month for each 1,000 pounds or fraction thereof over 6,000 pounds. Transient aerial applicator aircraft shall be charged at a rate of $20.00 per aircraft per day while using the Reedley

Page 9 of 25 ends

Fee
$
$

5.00 53.00

6.25 118.00
224.00
346.00
395.00
420.00
15%

5.00 50.00
Resolution No.
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2012-021
2019-041
2015-031
2018-037
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Building Fees:

Permit Issuance Fees:

Administrative Fee Per Permit
Building Permit Fees:

Building Permit Hourly Rate
Fees Per Valuation Table
Total Valuation
$1 .00 to $500.00 Total Valuation
$501 .00 to $2,000 Total Valuation
$2,001 .00 to $25,000 Total Valuation
$25,001 .00 to $50,000 Total Valuation
$50,001.00 to $100,000 Total Valuation
$100 ,001 .00 to $500,000 Total Valuation
$500,001.00 to $1 ,000,000 Total Valuation
$1 ,000,001.00 and up Total Valuatoin
General Plan Zoning & Building Maintenance Fee
Demolition Permit
CBSC SB1473 State Mandated Fee
Strong-Motion (Seismic Hazard) State Mandated Fee - Residential Strong-Motion (Seismic Hazard) State Mandated Fee - Commercial Plan Check Fees:

Building
New Master Plan
Established Master Plan
Residential Pools
Electrical Plans w/out Bldg Permit
Photovoltaic - Residential Only - Less than 10 kw
Photovoltaic - Residential Only - Greater than 10 kw
Electric Vehicle (EV) - Residential
Electric Vehicle (EV) - Commercial
Mechanical Plans w/out Bldg Permit

Page 10 of 25 ends

Fee
$ 29.00
$ 65.00
$ 23.50
$23.50 for the 1st $500.00 +
$3.05 for each additional
$100.00
$69.25 for the 1st $2,000.00
+ $14.00 for each additional
$1 ,000.00
$391 .75 for the 1st
$25,000.00 + $10.10 for
each additional $1 ,000.00
$643 .75 for the 1st
$50,000.00 + $7.00 for each
additional $1,000.00
$993.75 for the 1st
$100,000.00 + $5.60 for
each additional $1,000.00
$3,233.75 for the 1st
$500,00.00 + $4.75 for each
additional $1 ,000.00
$
$5,608.75 for the 1st
$1,000,000.00 + $3.65 for
each additional $1,000.00
Job Valuation X $0.0011

65.00 $4.00 per $100,000.00
Valuation Amount x 0.00013
Valuation Amount x 0.00028
$
65% of Building Fee
65% of Building Fee
50% of Building Fee

65.00 25.00

40.00 80.00

40.00 65.00

25.00 Resolution No.
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2016-037
2020-026
2020-026
2013-036
2013-036
2016-037
2020-026
2018-037
2018-037
2013-036
·-·-. -
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Building Fees Continued:

Plumbing Plans w/out Bldg Permit
Fire Alarm
Commercial Sprinkler System
Fire Hood Wet System
Dry System (Halon, CO2)
Residential Sprinkler System
Electrical Permit Fees:

Signs from addl circuit
Signs from one circuit
Single Family Wiring (x sq ft)
Swimming Pool
Temporary Circuits
Temporary Power Service
Plug-in Busways
Multi-Family Wiring (x sq ft)
Apparatus 50 to 100 HP
Area & Booth Lights
Electric Rides
Hourly Rate
Mechanical Rides w/Lights
Miscellaneous Apparatus
Motors 1 HP
Motors 2 to 10 HP
Motors 11 to 50 HP
Motors 51 to 100 HP
Non-Residential Appl iance ( 1-H P)
Outlets (Switches & Receptacles) - Up to 50
Outlets (Switches & Receptacles) - 51 -199
NEW Outlets (Switches & Receptacles) - 200+
Photovoltaic
Electric Vehicle (EV) - Per Space
Pole/Platform Mounted Lights
Portable Spa/ Hot Tub
Residential Appl iance-1 HP
Electric Service less than 200 Amp
Electric Service over 200 to 1,000 Amp
Electric Service over 1,000 Amp
Electrical Investigation Fee
Fire Alarm Inspection
Mechanical Permit Fees:

Additional Non-Classed Appliance
Air Handler less than 1 Ok CFM
Air Handler greater than 1 Ok CFM
Commercial Incinerator
Dryer Duct
Evap Cooler
Floor Furnace
Furnace-less than 1 00k BTU
Furnace-greater than 1 00k BTU
Gas Piping
Hood with Exhaust
Install/Replace Appliance
Pool/Spa Heater
Residential Incinerator
Suspended Heater
Vent w/HVAC
Vent w/Single Duct
$
$
$
$
$

Page 11 of 25 ends

Fee Resolution No.

25.00 2013-036
122.00
200.00
122.00
122.00
122.00

9.00 2013-036

33.00 2013-036

0.10 per sq ft 2013-036

65.00 2013-036
Per Hour

32.50 2013-036

9.00 20 13-036

0.15 per sq ft 2013-036

57.00 2013-036

9.00 2013-036

23.50 2013-036

65.00 2013-036

17.00 2013-036

33.00 2020-026

9.00 2013-036

12.30 24.60

74.50 9.00 2013-036

40.00 2022-027

80.00 2022-027
160.00 2022-027
200.00 2016-037
100.00 2018-037

2.00 2013-036

33.00 2013-036

9.00 2013-036

55.00 2017-045

75.00 2017-045
124.30
125.25

53.00 2013-036

10.65 33.00 2020-026

49.00 2020-026

17.00 2013-036

17.00 2020-026

33.00 2020-026

49.00 2020-026

33.00 2020-026

25.00 2020-026

25.00 2013-036

17.00 2013-036

17.00 2020-026

17.00 2020-026
·-
·-·-
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Building Fees Continued:

Zero-Clearance Fireplace
A/C, Boiler- 100k BTU/3HP
A/C, Boiler- 100k to 500k BTU/ to 15HP
A/C, Boiler- 500k-1,000k BTU/ to 50 HP
A/C, Boiler- over 1,000k BTU & 50 HP
Mechanical Investigation Fee
HVAC Ducts / Repair/ Replace
Plumbing Permit Fees:

Additional Labor after 1st Hour
Additional Gas Outlet
Backflow Preventer Less Than 2 Inch
Backflow Preventer Over 2 Inch
Dry System Inspection
Wet Sys Fire Hood/Duct Inspection
Under Gr Sys Flush & Pressure Test
Under Gr Sys Thrust Block Inspection
Overhead System Pressure Test
Residential Sprinkler Sys Inspection
Gas Piping up to 5 Outlets
Gas Water Heater
Interceptor
Interceptor (Sewer)
Lawn Sprinklers
On Site Manhole
On Site Sewer Mains
Plumbing Fixtures
Private Sewer Disposal System
Private Swimming Pool
Public Swimming Pool
Rain Water Systems
Replace Existing Septic Tank
Sewer Lines
SFR - One Bathroom
SFR - Two Bathrooms
SFR - Three Bathrooms
SPA (Private)
Water Heater
Water Piping
Multi Family - One Bathroom
Multi Family - Two Bathrooms
Multi Family - Three Bathrooms
Plumbing Investigation Fee
Well Abandonment
Sewer Abandonment
Monitoring Well
Roofing Permit Fees:

Residential
Simple Roof Overlay
Re-roof with Existing Sheathing
Re-roof with New Sheathing
Structural with Calculations
Commercial
Simple Roof Overlay up to 7,500 sq . ft.

Simple Roof Overlay 7,501 to 15,000 sq. ft.

Simple Roof Overlay 15,001 to 150,000 sq. ft.

Re-roof with Existing Sheathing up to 7,500 sq . ft.

Re-roof with Existing Sheathing 7,501 up to 15,000 sq. ft.

Re-roof with Existing Sheathing 15,001 to 150,000 sq. ft. $
$
$

Page 12 of 25 ends

Fee

17.00 33.00

49.00 74.00
110.00

65.00 49.00

65.00 2.00

25.00 33.00

53.00 53.00

60.00 60.00

60.00 53.00

33.00 33.00

25.00 25.00

17.00 42 .28

0.50 per linear foot

17.00 74.50

65.00 91.25

17.00 49.00

33.00 73.50

98.00 122.50

33.00 33.00

33.00 65.00
81 .50

98.00 65.00

33.00 33.00

33.00 130.00
160.00
190.00
Fee per Valuation Table
200.00
275.00
400.00
250.00
375.00
500.00
Resolution No.
20 13-036
2017-045
2017-045
20 17-045
2013-036
2017-045
20 13-036
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2020-026
2017-045
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2020-026
2013-036
2013-036
2020-026
2013-036
2017-045
2020-026
2013-036
2013-036
20 13-036
2013-036
2017-045
2017-045
2019-041
2017-045
2020-026
2020-026
2020-026
2020-026
2020-026
2020-026
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Building Fees Continued:

Re-roof with New Sheathing up to 7,500 sq . ft.

Re-roof with New Sheathing 7,501 up to 15,000 sq . ft.

Re-roof with New Sheathing 15,001 to 150,000 sq . ft.

Structural with Calculations up to 15,000 sq . ft.

Structural with Calculations 15,001 to 150,000 sq. ft.

Water Meter Inspection Fees:

Inspection Fee/ per meter
Water Meter Pricing:
1" Size
1 1/2" Size
2" Size
3" Size
4" Size
8" Size
Water Meter Spool - Varies
NEW Re-Inspection (applicable to all permits issued) I per occurence Grading Plan Review and Permitting Fees:

Plan Review
50 cubic yards or less
51 to 100 cubic yards
101 to 1,000 cubic yards
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards
200,001 cubic yards or more
Permitting
50 cubic yards or less
51 to 100 cubic yards
101 to 1,000 cubic yards
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards
100,001 cubic yards or more

Page 13 of 25 ends

Fee Resolution No.
300.00 2020-026
375.00 2017-045
500.00 2017-045
505.00 2017-045
620.00 2017-045

15.00 2014-026
Cost+ 5.0% 2016-037
Cost+ 5.0% 2016-037
Cost+ 5.0% 2016-037
Cost+ 5.0% 2016-037
Cost+ 5.0% 2016-037
Cost+ 5.0% 2016-037
Cost+ 5.0% 2014-026
$ 95.00 2022-027
No fee 2020-026
$ 23.50 2020-026

37.00 2020-026

49.25 2020-026
$49.25 for the first 10,000
cubic yards , plus $24.50
each additional 10,000 cubic
yards or fraction thereof. 2020-026
$269 .75 for the first 100,000
cubic yards , plus $13.25
each additional 10,000 cubic
yards or fraction thereof. 2020-026
$402 .25 for the first 200,000 2020-026
$ 23.50 2020-026
$ 37.00 2020-026
$37.00 for the first 100
cubic yards, plus $17.50 for
each additional 1,000 cubic 2020-026
$194.50 for the first 1,000
cubic yards , plus $14.50 for
each additional 1,000 cubic 2020-026
$325.00 for the first 10,000
cubic yards , plus $66.00 for
each additional 10,000 cubic 2020-026
$919 .00 for the first 100,000
cubic yards, plus $36.50 for
each additional 10.000 cubic 2020-026
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Planning Fees:

Administrative Review:

Administrative Review $
Non-Profit Entities Only (Proof of Status Required)
Relocation within Reedley or Ancillary Activities/Special Events for Existing Annexations:

Annexations
Annexations processed concurrently with other entitlements Covenant Fees:

Recorded Document Preparation
Notary Fee (for covenants only)
Conditional Use Permit (CUP):

CUP - New Development Project
CUP - Amendment
Development Impact Fee (DIF) Deferral Preparation:

Agreement Preparation
Release of Lien
Development Agreement:

Agreement Preparation
Annual Review
Entitlements:

Change of Zone
General Plan/Specific Plan Amendment
General Plan Maintenance Fee
Municipal Code Amendment
Public Hearing (Tentative Map, Change of Zone, & General Plan Amendment) $
Variance $
Environmental Review:

Categorical Exemption $
Initial Study
Environmental Impact Report*
Negative Declaration*
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation Monitoring Fee
NEPA Document
* Fee does not include fees for Fresno County and Fish and Game to be paid by applicant.

Land Division Applications:

Fee
100.00

25.00 25.00
6,250.00
4,000.00
275.00

25.00 3,900.00
1,500.00
400.00
200.00
250/hr. (1 hour min.)
275.00
5,000.00
5,500.00

0.95/$1 ,000 of Building
Valuation
5,500.00
350.00
1,000.00
250.00
800.00
Cost+ 10%
1,200.00
Cost+ 10%
Cost+ 10%
Cost+ 10%
Tentative Parcel Map $2 ,250+$70/lot
Tentative Parcel Map - City Council Meeting
Tentative Subdivision Map
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
Exceptions
Minor Modification
Tentative Map Renewal/Extension

Page 14 of 25 ends

500.00
$6 ,500+35/lot
$7,500+ 75/lot
$7,500+115/lot
775.00
750.00
250.00
Resolution No.
2014-026
20 16-037
20 15-03 1
2021-028
2021-028
20 18-037
2014-026
2021-028
202 1-028
2020-026
2020-026
2021-028
2012-02 1
2021-028
2021-028
20 12-02 1
2021-028
20 14-026
2021-028
2014-026
2021-028
2012-021
2019-04 1
20 12-021
2021-028
2012-02 1
202 1-028
2021-028
2021-028
2021-028
2021-028
2021-028
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Planning Fees Continued:

Miscellaneous:

Appeals $
Applicant Requested Continuance (City Council and Planning Comm.) Home Occupation Permit
Minor Deviation
Yard Encroachment
Photography/Filming Permit (Director Discretion)
Professional Technical Outsourcing
Public Convenience or Necessity Findings
Time Extension
Zoning Inquiry (Formal Response)
Sign Permits:

Banner Application
Master Sign Application
Minor Deviation and Permit Application - Sign
Sign Permit Application
Temporary Subdivision Sign Review
Site Plan Review (SPR):

SPR New
SPR Amendment
SPR Amendment - Minor
Accessory Dwelling Unit
Document Fees:

Digital Files:

Flash Drive of Digital Files(per drive)
Hard Copies:

General Plan
Housing Element
Specific Plan
Subdivision Ordinance
Zoning Ordinance
Maps:

Zoning
General Plan
Specific Plan
Medium Format Copies 11" x 17"
Large Format Copies 24" x 36"

Page 15 of 25 ends

$
$
$
Fee
500.00
250.00
200.00
500.00
150.00
210.00
Cost+ 10%
1,200.00
300.00
150.00

15.00 175.00

65.00 110.00
210.00
3,400.00
1,000.00
500.00
400.00

15.00 35.00

30.00 30.00

30.00 30.00
Color/ B & W

50.00 I 15.00

50.00 I 10.00

5.00 7.00
Resolution No.
20 12-021
20 12--02 1
2021--028
2021--028
2021--028
20 12--02 1
201 2-02 1
2021--028
201 2--021
2020-026
201 4-026
2021-028
202 1--028
2021--028
20 12--02 1
2021--028
2021--028
202 1--028
202 1--028
201 4-026
201 2-02 1
201 2--02 1
20 12--02 1
2012--02 1
20 12-02 1
20 14-026
20 12--021
·-
·-·-
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Transportation Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwel ling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq . ft.

Created through new construction
Non-Residential - Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq . ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq. ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Law Enforcement Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq. ft.

Created through new construction
Non-Residential - Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq . ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq . ft.)
Industrial (per sq . ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq. ft.)
Fee
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Page 16 of 25 ends

5,066.00
3,377.00
1,266.50

2.22 1.14

0.36 2,533.00
1,688.50

1.11 0.57
3,799.50
2,532 .75

1.67 0.86

0.27 120.00

80.00 30.00

0.050

0.027

0.008

60.00 40.00

0.025

0.014

90.00 60.00

0.038

0.020

0.006
Resolution No.
2015-022
2015-022
2020-026
20 15-022
20 15-022
20 15-022
2019-04 1
201 9-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
20 19-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
20 15-022
20 15-022
2020-026
20 15-022
2015-022
2015-022
2019-041
20 19-04 1
2019-041
2019-041
2019-041
2019-041
2019-04 1
2019-041
20 19-04 1
·-
·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Fire Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq. ft.

Created through new construction
Non-Residential - Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq. ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

General Government Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq. ft.

Created through new construction
Non-Residential- Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq. ft.)

Page 17 of 25 ends

Fee
$ 999.00
666.00
249.75
$ 0.440

0.225

0.072
$ 499.50
333.00

0.220

0.113
$ 749.25
499.50

0.330

0.169

0.054
$ 94.00

63.00 23.50
$ 0.040

0.021

0.007
$ 47.00
31 .50

0.020

0.011
$ 70.50

47.25 0.030

0.016

0.005
Resolution No.
2015-022
2015-022
2020-026
20 15-022
20 15-022
2015-022
201 9-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
20 19-04 1
2019-04 1
20 19-04 1
2019-04 1
201 9-04 1
2019-04 1
20 15-022
20 15-022
2020-026
2015-022
20 15-022
2015-022
20 19-041
2019-041
2019-041
20 19-041
2019-041
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
20 19-041
2019-04 1
·-·-
·-·---
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Storm Drain Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq . ft.

Created through new construction
Non-Residential - Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq. ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Wastewater Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq . ft.

Created through new construction
Non-Residential- Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq . ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq . ft.)
Fee
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Page 18 of 25 ends

4,396.00
2,931.00
1,099.00

1.922

0.990

0.311
2,198.00
1,465.50

0.961

0.495
3,297.00
2,198.25

1.442

0.743

0.233
2,521 .00
1,680.00
630.25

1.104

0.568

0.178
1,260.50
840.00

0.552

0.284
1,890.75
1,260.00

0.828

0.426

0.134
Resolution No.
2015--022
20 15-022
2020--026
20 15-022
2015-022
20 15--022
2019--04 1
20 19--04 1
20 19--04 1
20 19-04 1
20 19-04 1
20 19--04 1
201 9--04 1
2019--041
20 19--04 1
20 15-022
20 15-022
2020--026
2015--022
2015-022
2015-022
20 19-041
20 19-04 1
20 19-04 1
20 19-04 1
20 19-04 1
2019-04 1
20 19--04 1
2019-04 1
20 19-041
·-·-~-
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Water Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq. ft.

Created through new construction
Commerical/lndustrial - Per sq. ft.

Commercial
Industrial
Institutional/Other
City Center (50% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Fami ly (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
In-fill Area (25% Reduction)
Single Family ( per unit)
Multi-Family (per unit)
Commercial (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq . ft.)
Institutional/Other (per sq . ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:

Park and Recreational Facilities
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) over 750 sq . ft.

Created through new construction
Non- Residential - Per sq. ft.

Page 19 of 25 ends

1,984.00
1,323.00
496.00

0.869

0.447

0.140
992.00
661 .50

0.435

0.224
1,488.00
992.25

0.652

0.335

0.105
1,299.00
866.00
324.75

0.569

0.293

0.092
649.50
433.00

0.285

0.147
974.25
649.50

0.427

0.220

0.069
Resolution No.
2015-022
2015-022
2020-026
20 15-022
2015-022
2015-022
20 19-04 1
2019-041
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-04 1
2019-041
2019-041
2019-04 1
20 19-04 1
2015-022
20 15-022
2020-026
2015-022
2015-022
2015-022
2019-04 1
2019-041
2019-041
2019-04 1
20 19-041
2019-041
2019-041
2019-041
2019-041
·-
·-
··--
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Engineering Department
Engineering Fees:

Permit Issuance Fees:

Encroachment Permit
Addendum Plan Check
Construction Inspection of Public Improvements
Early Start Agreement
Commercial/Single Family Residential Improvement Plan Checking Subdivision and Parcel Map Improvement Plan Checking
Landscape and Lighting Formation Fee
Right of Way Summary Abandonment Requests
Right of Way Standard Abandonment Requests
Final Parcel Map
Final Tract Map
Lot Line Adjustment
Voluntary Parcel Merger

Page 20 of 25 ends

Fee

52.00 $ 250.00

4.5% of first $10,000; plus
3% of amount over
$10,000; Minimum $52.00
400.00
650.00 + Cost
1,800.00 + Cost
$ 1,750.00
1,100.00
1,800.00
1,000.00 + Cost
2,100.00 + Cost
$800.00 + Cost
$800.00 + Cost
Resolution No.
2020-026
2022-027
2020-026
2012-021
2019-041
2020-026
2021-028
2012-021
2012-021
2018-037
2020-026
2018-037
2015-031
·-·-
e-•-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Police Department
Report, Reproduction and Document Fees:

Report Copy I Call Log: up to 10 pages
Report Copy/ Call Log: each additional black & white page Citation Copies
Police Certificates
Photograph(+ duplication fees)
Reproduction of Photographs (Digital)
911/Radio Dispatch Recording
Production of Records - (Video Tapes, CDs and DVDs)
Report - Discovery (Reports or Audio or Video)
Permit and License Fees:

Dance Event Permit (public) (required by City Code)
Dance Event Permit (private)
Alcohol Permits - One Day
Door to Door Hawking (per July 1st to June 30th / per individual) Marijuana Cultivation Permit (Personal Use)
(75% non-refundable deposit due at time of request)
(25% remaining due at time of issuance)
Police Service Fees:

Lieutenant Officer/ per hour
Police Officer/ per hour*
Sergeant Officer/ per hour*
Community Services Officer/ per hour*
*Overtime rates may apply based upon availability of staff Fingerprinting
Safety lnspectionNIN Verification
Ticket Sign Off
Emergency Response Fee (DUI) - Accident or call for service only Gun Storage - Reedley Resident ($50 first gun, $25 each additional gun +$1/Day) Gun Storage - Non-Reedley Resident ($75 first gun, $25 each additional gun +$1 /Day) Vehicle Repossession (State Mandated Fee 26751 G.C.)
Vehicle lmpound/Stored**i.e. V.C. 12500 / 14601
Vehicle lmpound/Stored**i.e. V.C. 23152
Vehicle Impound Hearing
** Exception: Owners and operators of vehicles that are impounded or stored as a result of the owner/operator being a victim of a crime, and the vehicle is directly related to that crime.

Animal Control Fees:

Dog License (non-spayed/non-neutered)***
Dog License (spayed/neutered)***
Owner-Relinquished Animals
Animal Redemption/ Return (1st time)
Animal Redemption/ Return (2nd time)
Animal Redemption/ Return (3rd time)
*** A City Dog License covers the period of January 1st through December 31st. The fee for new licenses issued throughout the year will be pro-rated to the quarter in which they are issued.

Page 21 of 25 ends

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Fee

15.00 0.10

15.00 30.00

15.00 40.00
247.00

54.00 170.00

75.00 30.00

30.00 150.00
135.00
151 .00

85.00 123.00

58.00 20.00

20.00 15.00
325.00

50.00 75.00

15.00 175.00
225.00

50.00 24.00

12.00 60.00

25.00 35.00

50.00 Resolution No.
2012-021
2022-027
2012-021
2012-021
2012-021
2012-021
2018-037
2019-041
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2022-027
2012-021
2012-021
2012-021
2022-027
2022-027
2018-037
2012-021
2012-021
2012-021
·-
·-·-
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Public Works Department Wastewater Service Rates
Flat Rate Customers:

Residental / Per Customer/ Per Month
Duplex/Triplex/ Per Unit/ Per Month
Unmetered Commercial I Per 1,000 sq. ft. I Per Month
Metered Customers:

Base Rate Multi-Family, Commercial, Hospitals & Schools/ Per Month 3/4"
1"

1.5"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
Consumption (per 1,000 gallons)
All water consumption
125% of Average Winter Water Usage (AWWU)
Over Adjusted AWWU
Category I Industrial*:

Discharge/ Per 1,000 gallons
BOD/ Per Pound
SS I Per Pound
$
$
$
* All Category I industrial accounts must have an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit issued by City of Reedley.

Industrial Pre-Treatment Program:

F.O.G. Permit Application Fee* (includes 1st year inspection) * Fee prorated for businesses that start during the year.

F.O.G. Permit Inspection Fee/ per building/ per year
F.O.G. Re-Inspection/Out of Compliance Fee/ per occurrence Industrial Businesses:

Industrial Pre-Treatment Application Fee (New or Renewal) Industrial Pre-Treatment Permit/ per year
Industrial Pre-Treatment Permit Review Fee (New or Renewal) Industrial Pre-Treatment Inspections/ two (2) per year
Industrial Annual Discharge Monitoring
Late Fee/ any billed item (Assessed 30 days from invoice date) Service Call-Outs:

Applies only if problem is on private property and after normal business hours.

Laboratory Fees:

Analyte
pH
E.C.

BOD
TSS
Total Coliform P/A Method
Total Coliform Multiple Tube Method
HPC

Page 22 of 25 ends

$
$
$
Fee

54.26 46.36

48.19 20.51

34.24 68.22
109.25
204.96
341 .67
683.13
1,093.11

6.46 3.71

0.79 0.63

80.00 35.00

50.00 250.00
250.00
Cost+ 10%
100.00
Cost+ 10%

15.00 125.00
Per Test

15.00 15.00

35.00 20.00

25.00 30.00

35.00 Resolution No.
2021-054
2021 -054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2021 -054
2021-054
2021-054
2021-054
2014-026
2012-021
2013-036
2013-036
2012-021
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2013-036
2012-021
2016-037
2016-037
2016-037
2016-037
2016-037
2016-037
2016-037
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Public Works Department Wastewater Service Rates
Average Winter Water Average for Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Accounts:

Calculation of the Average Winter Water Usage (AWWU) will be 125% of the average consumption of what is billed on the customer's December, January, February, March, and April sewer bill. Customer must have consumption history with the City of Reedley for the aforementioned months. If a history is not available, then the customer will be billed per their actual consumption until the next AWWU calculation period. If a customer has O or 1,000 gallons of usage in a given month during the AWWU calculation period, those readings will not be included into the AWWU calculation . AWWU calculations will be rounded down to the nearest 1,000 gallons.

The billing for May, June, July, August, September, October, and November will be the lesser of either the calculated AWWU number or the actual consumption. Bills processed on December 1, January 1, February 1, March 1, and April 1, are based on actual consumption amounts during those billing periods, and not per an AWWU calculation . For All Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional accounts: If a separate "irrigation only" meter exists, then the AWWU calculation would only apply to the domestic meter.

Page 23 of 25 ends

·-·-
·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Public Works Department Water Service Rates
Residential Water Rate Structure: Fee
Service {Meter} Charge / per month
¾" and 1" $
1-½"
2"
Commodity Charge - $/1 2000 gallons
0 - 15,000 gallons $
15,000-25,000 gallons
Over 25,000 gallons
* Residential is defined as including single-family residential, duplex, Uiiplex and multi-family customers. ** Residential construction water will be billed per the rate structure above Non-Residential Water Rate Structure:

Service {Meter} Charge / per month
¾"
1"
1-½"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
Commodity Charge - $/1 2000 gallons
0 - 15,000 gallons
15,000-25,000 gallons
Over 25,000 gallons
* Non-Residential customers include commercial, industrial, and other/schools (also includes residential customers with meters larger than 2")
** Non residential construction water will be billed per the rate structure above Irrigation Water Rate Structure:

Service {Meter} Charge / per month
¾"
1"
1-½"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
Commodity Charge - $/1 2000 gallons
* Irrigation customers will be charged a monthly rate depending on meter size and a consumption rate. $
$
$
$

34.28 40.12

45.62 1.10

1.15 1.20

34.28 34.28

40.12 45.62

51.45 74.44
148.56
238.11

1.10 1.15

1.20 34.28

34.28 40.12

45.62 51.45

74.44 148.56
238.11

1.26 ** If customer has a second meter dedicated solely to landscape irrigation there will be no monthly service charge for that meter.

Page 24 of 25 ends

Resolution No.
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021 -053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
·-·-·-·-
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Public Works Department Water Service Rates
Temporary Construction Water (from fire hydrant):

Meter Refundable Deposit
Meter Rental / per month
Charge for water used/ per 1,000 gallons
Dedicated Fire Protection Service Line Charge:

Less than 2" inches
3inches
4 inches
6inches
8 inches and up
* The charge for water furnished per month to a fire sprinkler system shall be based upon the diameter of the service pipe connected to the City water main.

Service Call-Outs:

Outside of Normal Business Hours - Leak is on customer side/Turn on water One Day Water Service Fee / per day
Cut or Broken Lock
Turn On Service after 4:30 p.m. - 5:00pm
Residential & Non-Residential Drought Rate Structure:

Commodity Charge - ~/1 1000 gallons
Stage 1
0 - 15,000 gallons
15,000-25,000 gallons
Over 25,000 gallons
Stage 2
0 - 15,000 gallons
15,000-25,000 gallons
Over 25,000 gallons
Stage 3
0 - 15,000 gallons
15,000-25,000 gallons
Over 25,000 gallons
Stage 4
0 - 15,000 gallons
15,000-25,000 gallons
Over 25,000 gallons
Irrigation Drought Rate Structure:

Commodity Charge - ~/1 1000 gallons
Stage 1
All Consumption
Stage 2
All Consumption
Stage 3
All Consumption
Stage 4
All Consumption

Page 25 of 25 ends

Fee
$ 903.54

66.22 1.08
$ 37.85

75.46 113.36
150.82
188.60
$ 123.00

46.12 51 .25
51 .25
$ 1.23

1.30 1.36
$ 1.50

1.55 1.60
$ 2.06

2.12 2.18
$ 2.85

2.91 2.97
$ 1.42
$ 1.69
$ 2.32
$ 3.19
Resolution No.
2020-050
2020-050
2020-050
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2022-027
2020-050
2020-050
2020-050
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
2021-053
·-·-
·-
·-
DATE: March 22, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
E]FILE corv
• Consent
• Regular Item
• Workshop
• Closed Session
181 Public Hearing
ITEMN0: _3_
TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN

DEPARTMENTAL FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES IN THE CITYWIDE

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE (NO ACTION)
REVIEWED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manager
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to certain Departmental fees and charges in the Citywide Master Fee Schedule as presented in the attached fee schedule, to take effect July 1, 2022. A public hearing notice was published in the Mid-Valley Times on March 10, 2022. The amended Master Fee Schedule will be brought forward for City Council consideration and approval on April 12, 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff conducts an annual review of all fees contained in the City Master Fee Schedule to ensure that services are equitably priced and costs are appropriately recovered. The attached Master Fee Schedule is categorized by the individual Departments in charge of assessing and collecting the fees. The current fee charged by the City is shown in one column along with any proposed amendments next to it. All changes are shown in bold font and italicized for ease of review. Any removal of fees has been shown in strikethrough. The attached Master Fee Schedule is intended to include all fees currently charged by the City; although in some cases a fee may not be included if it is established by the State of California or otherwise stipulated in the Reedley Municipal Code. The following discussion summarizes proposed changes to fees by category or program area in the order in which they appear in the Master Fee Schedule.

PROPOSED FEE REVISIONS
Fire Department Fees
Most fees under the purview of the Fire Department are proposed to be increased based on the current fully burdened (salary+ benefits) hourly rate of the Battalion Chief, who conducts most of the inspections.

The fees for Commercial Fire Sprinkler System inspections have not been adjusted in over 10 years. The time required to review items under the Plan Check section were also reviewed , and time required to review them has changed as well.

Veterans Banner Program
As presented during the mid-year budget review in February 2022, due to inflation and rising costs of shipping, the City will need to charge $250.00 per veterans banner (for new banners) for the program to roughly cover its own costs. Staff is also recommending establishing a $40.00 annual rehanging fee to recover costs incurred as a result of rehanging and removing the banner to return it to the applicant.

Return to roe:= ·-
·-
Community Services Programs
For the majority of the fees under the purview of the Community Services Department (CSD), staff are recommending incremental increases that closely track the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index and/or the $1.00 per hour minimum wage increase effective January 1, 2022. Most recreation staff have pay rates that are close to the minimum wage; therefore, the increases directly affect the cost to offer the program. By implementing incremental increases, the City can continue to recruit and retain quality staff, and maintain the supporting equipment and facilities the programs utilize.

Municipal Airport
Most fees at the airport are proposed to be increased by approximately 4%, following the annual change in the Consumer Price Index. This increase affects the fees for tie downs and City-operated aircraft hangars.

Building Re-Inspection Fee
Building Division staff spend significant periods of time conducting onsite re-inspections to ensure the work completed by the contractor is in compliance with the California Building Code. Staff propose to add a reinspection fee, common to other cities, of $95.00 to cover the staff time associated with scheduling, inspection and follow up activity. The City already has a fee for "Additional Inspections", established in 2013; however, it is only applicable to electrical permits and no longer covers the cost of staff time.

Electrical Outlet Permits
Staff propose to revise the permit fees for electrical outlets (switches & receptacles) to more accurately account for the inspector's time. The existing fee for electrical permits up to 20 outlets will now cover up to 50 outlets, and increase from $33.00 to $40.00. Permits for more than 20 outlets will now cover from 51- 199 outlets, and increase from $49.00 to $80.00. For larger projects, defined as having 200+ outlets, a new flat fee of $160.00 would be established.

Addendum Plan Check
This fee is for the review of revised plans after a plan set has been approved due to field conditions or after the fact changes by property owners or developers. A review of this nature typically takes 3+ hours of staff time depending on the nature of the revision. Items of this nature are rare and staff will address as many changes as possible during the initial submittal of improvement plans to minimize the use of this item. Staff propose to increase this fee from $120.00 to $250.00, which has not been adjusted since 2012.

Police Fees
Staff propose to eliminate nine separate fees that are no longer charged by the Police Department. There is no impact to services already provided to the public as a result of the deletions. There is also one fee, for 911 /Dispatch Recordings, where staff propose to remove the staff time limitation as it is no longer relevant; however, the existing fee amount will remain unchanged. In addition, existing Police Service Fees are being updated to current fully burdened hourly pay rates for community events requiring additional police presence, and the cost to provide copies of citations has increased from $11 .00 to $15.00. Lastly, vehicle impound fees are proposed to be increased by $25.00 and $75.00, depending upon the vehicle code violation, respectively, based on the current cost of staff time to administer the impounds. These particular fees have not been amended since 2012.

Solid Waste Fees
Effective July 1, 2021 , all solid waste collections and operations were privatized under a Franchise Agreement with Mid Valley Disposal, LLC. All fees associated with the former City enterprise can now be removed from the Master Fee Table as they are now maintained in the Franchise Agreement. Current rates are fixed for the first two years of operation, through June 30, 2023. A copy of solid waste rates will continue to be posted to the website and on file at the utility billing counter for the public.

Page 2 of 3 ends

Return to Toe:= ·-
·-
B fl LE COiV
Water Service Call-Outs
The existing fee for service call-outs outside of normal business hours is proposed to be increased from $102.50 to $123.00 to cover the average cost of staff time associated with the call out. This fee is only charged to the customer when water is requested to be turned on outside of normal business hours or when a leak is determined to be on the customer side of the meter.

BACKGROUND
The annual review of fees is a key component to maintaining financial control, equitably pricing services and offerings, and identifying core programs, facilities, and services for an agency. Critical to this undertaking is the support and buy-in of elected officials, advisory boards, staff, and, most importantly, of citizens. A regular review of fees usually mitigates the large increases to fees necessary when it is discovered years later that a particular fee or group of fees is not meeting cost recovery targets.

When reviewing City fees, it is important to understand who is benefiting from a specific service to determine how that service should be paid for. The basic premise used by many agencies is that the higher the benefit is to an individual from a City service, the higher the cost recovery ratio should be; and the more service benefits the community as a whole, the lower the cost recovery ratio should be (or in some cases no fee at all).

It is also important to note that reviewing the fee schedule does not always mean fees will be increased.

In some cases, fees are recommended to be lowered because the cost of providing that particular service has fallen due to operating efficiencies. In other cases, individual fees may be lowered to bring them in line with fees for comparable services or completely removed because the service is no longer provided. And finally, revisions may take the form of text changes to how a fee is presented in the document; either to clarify its purpose or specify policies affecting collection of the fee.

The attached schedule is a compilation of current fees charged by the City for services and products provided by the City, and is referred to as the Master Fee Schedule. The Master Fee Schedule is posted on the City website for easy public and staff access. A best practice of municipal governments is to review all fees on an annual basis and publish the Master Fee Schedule annually. This ensures that multiple objectives are met, such as:
• The Council and public are informed and have the opportunity to participate in the fee review process;
• Cost recovery ratios for specific fees are reviewed;
• Changes in constituent use and/or demand for services is reviewed annually; and • Additional revenue from fee revisions can be quantified and built into the following year's budget to offset increasing or decreasing costs of providing certain services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The majority of the revised fees will generate additional revenue to the City to offset the increased costs of providing those services. If approved as proposed, the anticipated level of new revenue for each service/operation will be incorporated into the FY 2022-2023 Proposed Budget.

ATTACHMENTS
Master Fee Schedule Showing Proposed Amendments

Page 3 of 3 ends

Return to TOC ·-:=
·-
DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

April 12, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 5
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-028 DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ORDER

THE DISSOLUTION OF ZONES B, D, AND F FROM THE CITY OF REEDLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND SETTING

A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
Marilu S. Morales, P.E.

City Engineer
Nicole R. Zieba L
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-028 declaring its intention to order the dissolution of Zones B, D, and F from the City of Reedley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the date for a public hearing on Tuesday, April 26, 2022.

BACKGROUND
On March 23, 2021, City Council initiated Proposition 218 proceedings for seven zones within the City of Reedley's Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District (LLMD) No. 1 due to the zones not having cost inflater language for annual consumer price index (CPI) increases in their enabling documents. On May 25, 2021, the Proposition 218 ballots were opened and tabulated for the seven zones. Zone F was the only Zone that did not have a majority protest and approved the increased assessment. This Zone was one of three zones that encompass the median islands along Kingswood Parkway in the "River Bottom" Area.

Due to the majority of the zones not passing, staff held a workshop on June 22, 2021 presenting to City Council options to reduce maintenance costs to the six zones that did not pass and improvements to the one zone that did pass. Due to the fact that the median islands along Kingswood Parkway were split into three zones, a public meeting was held on June 24, 2021 for the residents of the "River Bottom" Area. The meeting attendees were presented with the cost savings measures, which included removing of the redwood trees and many spoke out against the tree removal. The attendees were presented with the option of balloting a larger overlay district along the River Bottom to help offset the improvement costs and they were in favor of that option. On November 9, 2021 the ballots for the overlay district were opened and tabulated for Zone DD and there was no majority protest therefore, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-116 annexing Zone DD into the City of Reedley LLMD No. 1.

Zones B, D and F are encompassed by Zone DD, therefore, the property owners within Zones B, D, and F will be assessed an annual fee through their property tax for the cost of maintaining landscaping and street lighting within Zone DD. The dissolution of Zones B, D, and F will ensure the property owners are not double assessed for the maintenance costs.

To initiate the process for the dissolution of Zones B, D, and F, the Council must approve a resolution to dissolve Zones B, D and F. Resolution No. 2022-028 declares the Councils intent to dissolve Zones B, D, and F and sets the public hearing date for April 26, 2022. At that time Council will consider public input regarding the dissolution of Zones B, D, and F and if there is no majority protest, a resolution to be heard at the public hearing on April 26, 2022 will dissolve Zones B, D, and F beginning in fiscal year 2022-2023.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost to process this dissolution is minor due to staff preparing the items.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
On November 9, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-116 annexing territory into the City of Reedley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District (LLMD) No. 1 as Zone DD.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-28, declaring its intention to order the dissolution of Zones B, D, and F from the City of Reedley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and setting a time and place for a public hearing.

Page 2 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-028

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE DISSOLUTION OF ZONES B, D,

AND F FROM THE CITY OF REEDLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A

PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, in Fiscal Years 1991-1992 and 1994-1995, the City Council by previous Resolutions formed/annexed the City of Reedley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Zones B, D, and F (hereinafter referred to as the "Zones11 ), pursuant to the provisions of the
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (the "1972 Acn, and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID, section 4 of the California State Constitution (the "California Constitution11
) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act
(the "Omnibus Acn, being Government Code section 53750 et seq ("Proposition 21811 , The Right
to Vote on Taxes Act); and
WHEREAS, since formation/annexation there have been no development or maintenance activities in the Zones; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the Zones be dissolved; and WHEREAS, there is no fiscal impact and there is no impact on setting the Public Hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Reedley, using their independent judgment, approves Resolution No. 2022-028 based on the following:

1. Intention: The City Council hereby declares its intention to dissolve the Zones.

2. Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning the dissolution of the Zones, in accordance with Part 2, Division 15 of the California Street and Highways Code, Section 22605 of the Act. Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, April 26, 2022, at 7:00 P.M., the City Council will hold a Public Hearing on the of dissolution of the Zones, or as soon thereafter as feasible. The Public Hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, located at 845 G Street in the City of Reedley, California, at the time so fixed. At the Public Hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.

3. Notice: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of such Public Hearing as provided by law.

4. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and shall enter the same in the Book of Original Resolutions of the City.

5. Effective Date: This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley this 12th day of April 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mary L. Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2022-028
DATE:

TITLE:

REVIEWED:

APPROVED:

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
April 12, 2022
D Consent Calendar
~ Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _;_..._ 0 __

APPROVE ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE PAINTING OF THE TWO DOWNTOWN

WATER TOWERS
A. AWARD A PAINTING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $541,286 TO WM. B.

SALEH COMPANY FOR COMPLETE PAINT REMOVAL AND REPAINTING

THE TWO ICONIC DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS TO MATCH THE

CURRENT COLORS OF THE WATER TOWERS WITH NO CHANGES AND

AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS.

B. APPROVE UTILIZING PROJECT CONTINGENCY FUNDS IF ADEQUATE

PROJECT CONTINGENCY FUNDS REMAIN FROM THE TOTAL PROJECT COST TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL WORDS "REEDLEY" ON OPPOSITE
SIDES OF THE TANKS AND ADDITIONAL UP-LIGHTING.

C. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-029 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021- 2022 ADOPTED BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $345,414 IN

CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021 FOR REPAINTING THE TWO DOWNTOWN WATER TOWERS.

Russ Robertson, Public Works Director ~
Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City.,, Ma~
Nicole Zieba, City Manager V V

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of items A; award a painting contract in the amount of $541,286 to Wm.

B. Saleh Company for complete re-painting of the two downtown water towers, and item C; adopt Resolution No. 2022-029 amending the fiscal year 2021-2022 Adopted Budget to appropriate an additional $345,414 in Coronavirus State and local Fiscal Recovery Funds under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) funds to complete funding for the project budget of $595,414.

Staff also recommends discussion and consideration of item B, which includes additional work to be completed only if adequate project contingency monies are available at project completion, and would not represent an increase to the overall project budget. Currently, the water towers have the words 'Reedley' stenciled on one side of each tower. Approval of item B would include that the words 'Reedley' be also stenciled on the opposite sides of each tower so that the word 'Reedley' can be seen from any direction and also install associated new up-lighting to illuminate the new words.

Page 1 of 3 ends

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 22, 2022, staff provided a presentation to the City Council regarding the condition of the water towers, updates to the inspection report, and the lone bid received to paint the towers. At that time Council directed staff to look into potential cost of adding new graphics or the City logo to the water towers and bring the item back for further discussion.

Staff solicited prices for the painting of a full color City logo on the water towers and a 15' full round logo would cost $35,000 per logo. To paint one City logo on each tower would cost $70,000. Due to the detail and colors in the logo the logo would need to be re-painted about every 15 years or so. An option to painting would be to install a graphic onto the tower. Staff received a quote for a vinyl graphic and a graphic wrap for each tank which would include the words REEDLEY and one logo per wrap would cost $12,000 per tank. The graphic wrap is significantly cheaper; however, per the manufacturer, the vinyl graphic wrap would only last about seven years before it would start to fade and need replacing .

Opinions from the public regarding the issue were solicited using social media and the Mid Valley Times.

Several ideas of changing colors or adding colored lighting were proposed however the overwhelming response was to keep the towers looking exactly as they currently do. The Reedley Historical Society also commented that they would desire that the colors and current look of the towers not be changed.

BACKGROUND
The Downtown Water towers were originally constructed in 1913 and 1923. Over the course of the last several years staff has noticed that the paint coating is chipping off of the tanks and there is growing concerns of rust and corrosion on the tower's exterior. It is unknown the last time the towers were painted but staff believes that the current paint is well over 40 years old.

On July 7, 2021, a thorough inspection of the downtown water towers was performed by Utility Service Company. The interior and exterior surfaces of the tank were inspected to assess the condition of the coating system as well as structural integrity, safety conditions, and sanitary conditions of the tanks. The result of the inspection was that the paint coating on the water towers is in very poor condition and the towers need to be re-painted.

On August 10, 2021, the City Council approved an allocation of $250,000 for the painting of the two towers. This initial request was based on an informal estimate of cost received from one of the vendors based on their past experience and potential issues with the City water towers. It was not known at that time that the State would not allow sandblasting of the old paint on the towers as allowed in other States.

Staff communicated at that time that once a final bid had been received, City staff would bring the project before the City Council with more information in consideration of project award.

Beginning in August of 2021 through February of 2022 staff contacted numerous paint companies throughout California to gather proposals from contractors to perform the recoating project. Initially, four contractors were interested in the project, however when the scope of the project expanded and it was determined that the chipping and recoating work would have to be done by hand and sandblasting would not be allowed only one contractor submitted a proposal and the others declined. The lone proposal received is for the amount of $541,286. Due to the intensified scope of work, including environmental remediation required by the State, the lone proposal exceeds the initial appropriation of $250,000.

Included in the total project budget is staff's request for a project contingency of 10% of the painting bid or $54, 128 to cover any unforeseen incidentals. Because the cost is much higher than anticipated, staff is bringing forward the information to the City Council for consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed Budget Amendment amends the FY 2021-2022 Adopted Budget and appropriates an additional $345,414 for the project for a total of $595,414 from the ARPA funds to pay for removal of old chipped paint, complete recoating, and re-painting the words 'Reedley' on the City's Downtown Water

Page 2 of 3 ends

Towers. There are sufficient unallocated funds available in the City's ARPA funds. There is no impact to the City's General Fund.

ATTACHMENTS
Proposal received from Wm. B. Saleh Company
Resolution 2022-029

Page 3 of 3 ends

Wm. 8. SALEH CO.

DISTINCTIVE PAINTING

PROPOSAL/CONTRACT

SBE CERTIFIED
Fresno Office
1364 N. Jackson
Fresno, CA 93703
Phone:(559) 255-2046
FAX: (559) 255-2907
DIR No. 1000003170
To: City of Reedley
Attn: John Ornellas
Date: February 7, 2022
Subject Job: Reedley Water Tanks
We propose to furnish at the above job all labor, materials, equipment, supervision, Workers' Compensation Property Damage and Liability Insurance necessary to complete in a thoroughly workmanlike manner all the work described below.

SCOPE OF WORK:

Lead Protocol:

Preparation:

Coating System:

Primer:

Top Coat
Logo:

Lift Equipment:

EXCLUSIONS:

NOTE:

Prepare, prime and repaint the exterior of two (2) 50,000 gallon elevated tanks, north and south located at 10th and H St. Work to include all surfaces of the exterior.

Tanks
Struts
Platforms
Cat Walks
Hatch

TOTAL BID AMOUNT
Access Ladders
Legs
Hand Rails
Overhang
e To follow safe practice for lead stabilization
• Employee safety oSoil samples
1tAir monitoring e Disposal of waste
o Removal of loose coatings
oAbraid all existing coatings
Bowl
Tension Rods
Riser
Finials
$541,286.00
a Utilize scrapers, wet sanding and hand tools with hepa attachments ct6 mil plastic to protect the ground
Brush and roll to limit overspray
1 coat High Solids Epoxy Amerlock 400
2 coats DTM Urethane Mastic Durathane
Repaint existing Logo
Provided or rented by Wm. B. Saleh Co
Overtime
Unforeseen Repairs
Weekends
Interior Work
Owner to provide permits and lane closures.

Sandblasting
Repairs noted in report by Suez
STATE LICENSE NO. 268108 Wm. B. SALEH Co. : ~t\f\.0-..~ 1i\.l'< (lt \\ Richard Purcell gm •
ACCEPTANCE - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined.

TERMS: This contract includes all the terms and conditions attached to this sheet and they are approved and accepted by the signatures below. This proposal must be accepted wrthin 30 days of the date hereof to become a valid contract. If approved and accepted, please sign below and return to our office.
r')ate of Acceptance:

BAKERSFIELD
OFFICE:
2361 Cepheus Court
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Phone: (661) 393-8842
Fax {661) 393-8138
Signature:

MONTEREY OFFICE: 407 Reservation Rd., Suite 3
Marina, CA 93933
Phone: 831-384-1552
Fax: 831-384-7620
Return to rod::
•=

BUDGET AMENDMENT
RESOLUTION 2022-029
The City Council of the City of Reedley does hereby amend the 2021-2022 Budget as follows:

Section I - Additions:

FUND-DEPT.OBJECT
025-4295.6147 Downtown Water Towers Painting
AMOUNT
$345,414
Purpose: To fund additional costs associated with paint removal, recoating the two downtown water towers, and repainting the words "REEDLEY".

Section II - Source of Funding:

FUND
025-2710 ARPA Fund Balance
AMOUNT
$345,414
Impact: There are sufficient funds available in the ARPA allocation. There is no impact to the City's General Fund.

Reviewed:
p~~
Assistant City Manager
The foregoing resolution is hereby adopted this 12th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN :

APPROVED:

Mary L. Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

Recommendation:

April 12, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
• consent
~ Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _J __ _
INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-003 OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY PER CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL NUMBER 481 ALLOWING

THE REEDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ACQUIRE AND USE
EQUIPMENT DESIGNATED BY ASSEMBLY BILL NUMBER 481.

Jose L. Garza, Chief of Polic
Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager
Introduce ordinance number 2022-003 of the City Council of the City of Reedley adopting a Military Equipment Use policy per California Assembly Bill Number 481 allowing the Reedley Police Department to acquire and use equipment designated by Assembly Bill Number 481.

Background:

Assembly Bill 481 (AB481), codified Government Code sections 7070 through 7075 requiring a law enforcement agency (LEA) to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, via adoption of a "military equipment" use policy by ordinance, prior to the LEA funding, acquiring, or using military equipment. The Reedley Police Department seeks City Council adoption of the attached Military Use Policy - Policy 708, in order to allow the Reedley Police Department to continue using vital equipment specified therein.

Items deemed to be "military equipment" by AB 481 are used as a component of overall best practices for LEA's throughout the country. These tools have been tested in the field, and are used by LEA's to enhance community safety and officer safety. Loss of these items would jeopardize the welfare of our community and peace officers within the Reedley Police Department.

The term "military equipment", as used in AB481, in fact does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military. Pursuant to AB481, items deemed to be

Page 1 of 2 ends

"military equipment" include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles, armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, pepper balls, less lethal 40 mm projectile launchers, and distraction devices.

The Reedley Police Department is committed to using the most up to date tools and equipment to safeguard the community of Reedley. Many of the items deemed to be "military equipment" by AB481 are in fact employed by the Reedley Police Department, and LEA's across the country, in order to specifically reduce risk to community members. These items provide peace officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations which otherwise might rise to the level of a lethal force encounter. To that end, the items at issue in this report, and accompanying Military Equipment Policy, also provide the Reedley Police Department with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its stringent use of force policy.

Fiscal Impact:

The approval of this ordinance will not incur any additional funds as this ordinance authorizes pre-existing purchased or acquired equipment deemed "military equipment" by AB481. The purchase of any future equipment deemed "military equipment" will be brought to the Reedley City Council in a prepared staff report or as part of the annual budget proposal.

Attachments:

Ordinace 2022-003
Reedley Police Policy section 708
List of equipment deemed "military equipment" by AB481

Page 2 of 2 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-003

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 14 TO TITLE 5 OF THE REEDLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING POLICE ACQUISITION AND USE OF "MILITARY EQUIPMENT" WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) was signed into law; and
WHEREAS, AB 481 and California Government Code Sections 7070, through 7072 require that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve a Military Equipment Use Policy by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the amendment of Title 5 (Police and Public· Safety) to add Chapter 14 Military Equipment Use Ordinance is necessary to comply with the requirements of AB 481 and California Government Code Sections 7070 through 7072.

BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Reedley as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 14 of Title 5 of the Reedley Municipal Code is added to read as follows:

Title 5

POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Chapter 14
"MILITARY EQUIPMENT" USE ORDINANCE
5-14-1: NAME OF ORDINANCE
5-14-2: DEFINITIONS
5-14-3: MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY REQUIREMENT
5-14-4: USE IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
5-14-5: REPORTS ON THE USE OF CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT
5-14-6: ENFORCEMENT
5-14-7: SEVERABILITY
5-14-1: NAME OF ORDINANCE
A. This Ordinance shall be known as the Military Equipment Use Ordinance. 5-14-2: DEFINITIONS
A. "Military Equipment" includes all of the following (Per CA Gov. Code §7070):

1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.

2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.

However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.

5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.

6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.

7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

8. Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

9. Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.

10. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency.

11. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.

12. "Flashbang" grenades and explosive breaching tools, "tear gas," and "pepper balls," excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.

13. Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).

14. The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, "bean bag," rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.

15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

16. Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), "Military Equipment" does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.

B. "City" means any department, agency, bureau, and/or subordinate division of the City of Reedley.

C. "Police Department" means any division, section, bureau, employee, volunteer and/or contractor of the Reedley Police Department.

D. "City Council" means the governing body that is the Reedley City Council.

E. "Military Equipment Use Policy" means a publicly released, written document that includes, at a minimum, all of the following:

1. A description of each type of Military Equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the Military Equipment.

2. The purposes and authorized uses for which the law enforcement agency or the state agency proposes to use each type of Military Equipment.

3. The fiscal impact of each type of Military Equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment.

4. The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use.

5. The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any officer, agent, or employee of the law enforcement agency or the state agency is allowed to use each specific type of Military Equipment to ensure the full protection of the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the Military Equipment use policy.

6. The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Military Equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy.

7. For a law enforcement agency, the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of Military Equipment, and how the law enforcement agency will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.

F. "Exigent Circumstances" means a law enforcement agency's good faith belief that an emergency involving the danger of, or imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to any person is occurring, has occurred, or is about to occur.

G. "State agency" means the law enforcement division of every state office, officer, department, division, bureau, board, and commission or other state body or agency, except those agencies provided for in Article IV ( except Section 20 thereof) or Article VI of the California Constitution.

H. "Type" means each item that shares the same manufacturer model number. 5-14-3: MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY REQUIREMENT
A. The Reedley Police Department shall obtain approval of the City Council, by an ordinance adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy (MEUP) at a regular meeting of the City Council held pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 ( commencing with Section 54950) of Part I of Division 2 of Title 5), prior to engaging in any of the following:

I. Requesting Military Equipment made available pursuant to Section 2576a of Title IO of the United States Code.

2. Seeking funds for Military Equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.

3. Acquiring Military Equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.

4. Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of Military Equipment within the territorial jurisdiction of the City of Reedley.

5. Using any new or existing Military Equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body pursuant to this chapter.

6. Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of, Military Equipment.

7. Acquiring Military Equipment through any means not provided by this section.

B. No later than May 1, 2022, if seeking to continue the use of any Military Equipment that was acquired prior to January I, 2022, the Reedley Police Department shall commence a City Council approval process in accordance with this section. If the City Council does not approve the continuing use of Military Equipment, including by adoption pursuant to a Military Equipment Use Policy submitted pursuant to this code, within 180 days of submission of the proposed Military Equipment Use Policy to City Council, the Reedley Police Department shall cease its use of the Military Equipment until it receives the approval of City Council in accordance with this code.

C. In seeking the approval of City Council, the Reedley Police Department shall submit a proposed Military Equipment Use Policy to City Council and make those documents available on the Police Department's internet website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the Military Equipment at issue.

D. The governing body shall consider a proposed Military Equipment Use policy as an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting and provide for public comment in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5).

E. The governing body shall only approve a Military Equipment Use Policy pursuant to this chapter if it determines all of the following:

1. The Military Equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

2. The proposed Military Equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

3. If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

4. Prior Military Equipment use complied with the Military Equipment Use Policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying Military Equipment Use Policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

F. In order to facilitate public participation, any proposed or final Military Equipment Use Policy shall be made publicly available on the internet website of the Police Department for as long as the Military Equipment is available for use.

G. The City Council shall review any ordinance that is has adopted pursuant to this Chapter approving the funding, acquisition, or use of Military Equipment at least annually and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting held pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 ( commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5). 5-14-4: USE IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
A. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Chapter, the Police Department may acquire, borrow and/or use Military Equipment in Exigent Circumstances without following the requirements of this code.

B. If the Police Department acquires, borrows, and/or uses Military Equipment in Exigent Circumstances, in accordance with this section, it must take all of the following actions:

1. Provide written notice of that acquisition or use to the City Council within 30 days following the commencement of such Exigent Circumstance, unless such information is confidential or privileged under local, state or federal law.

2. If it is anticipated that the use will continue beyond the Exigent Circumstance, submit a proposed amended Military Equipment Use Policy to the City Council within 90 days following the borrowing, acquisition and/or use, and receive approval, as applicable, from the City Council.

3. Include the Military Equipment in the Police Department's next annual Military Equipment Report.
5-14-5: REPORTS ON THE USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT
A. The Police Department shall submit to City Council an annual Military Equipment Report for each type of Military Equipment approved by the City Council within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the Military Equipment is available for use.

B. The Police Department shall also make each annual Military Equipment Report required by this section publicly available on its internet website for as long as the Military Equipment is available for use.

C. The annual Military Equipment Report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of Military Equipment:

1. A summary of how the Military Equipment was used and the purpose of its use.

2. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the Military Equipment.

3. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the Military Equipment Use Policy, and any actions taken in response.

4. The total annual cost for each type of Military Equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the Military Equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual Military Equipment Report.

5. The quantity possessed for each type of Military Equipment.

6. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional Military Equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of Military Equipment.

D. Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual Military Equipment Report pursuant to this section, the Police Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual Military Equipment report and the law enforcement agency's funding, acquisition, or use of Military Equipment.

E. The City Council shall determine, based on the annual Military Equipment Report submitted pursuant to this section, whether each type of Military Equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in this code and the Military Equipment Use Policy. If the City Council determines that a type of Military Equipment identified in the annual Military Equipment Report as not complied with the standards for approval, the City Council shall either disapprove a renewal of the authorization of or that type of Military Equipment or require modification to the Military Equipment Use Policy in a manner that will resolve the lack of compliance.
5-14-7: SEVERABILITY
A. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Chapter, or any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Chapter.

B. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Chapter and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, and word not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any other portion of this Chapter or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause this ordinance or a summary of this ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Reedley, within fifteen ( 15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.
* * * * * *
I II
I II
I II
I II
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on _________ , 2022, and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council held on _________ , 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mary Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk

Page 1 of 4 ends

Equipment Owned by the Reedley Police Department listed in AB 481 Equipment Type: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS/Drones) - CA Gov't Code §7070(c)(l) Quantity Owned/Sought: 3 owned
Equipment Capabilities: Remotely piloted aerial vehicles capable of providing live and recorded video images captured from aerial positions, including images enhanced by Forward Looking Infrared (FUR) and optical zoom lenses.

Manufacturer Product Description:

OJI MAVIC Enterprise Advanced: Powerful, industrial-grade flight platform with world class agility and speed. The aircrafts visual sensors enable enhanced hovering precision. This platform comes with a Thermal Forward Looking lnfraRed (FUR) system which allows use at night or in low light situations.

OJI MAVIC Pro 2: This product is a commercially purchased UAS platform equipped with a camera capable of still photography or video.

OJI Spark: This product is a commercially purchased UAS platform equipped with a camera capable of still photography or video. This UAS is small than the other two UAS's allowing it to be flown indoors and deployed easily.

Purpose/Authorized Uses: UAS/Drones may be utilized to enhance the Department's mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective.

Uses may include but are not limited to: search and rescue; suspect apprehension; crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring, identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally authorized surveillance.

Fiscal Impacts: The initial costs of equipment, licensing, software and training was approximately $10,000. Ongoing cost associated with UAS operation and maintenance is estimated to be approximately $5,000 per year.

Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: Any use of a UAS will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. The use of the UAS potentially involves privacy considerations. Absent a warrant or exigent circumstances, operators and observers shall adhere to FAA altitude regulations and shall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., residence, yard, enclosure). Operators and observers shall take reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Reasonable precautions can include, for example, deactivating or turning imaging devices away from such areas or persons during UAS operations.

Training Required: Prior to piloting any UAS/Drone staff members must complete all training required by our FAA COA.

Compliance: The Chief of Police will ensure compliance with the military use policy. Violations of this policy will be dealt with according to department policies.

Other Notes: Lifespan for UAS's platforms are approximately 2-3 years due to ever-changing technology.

Page 2 of 4 ends

Equipment Type: Unmanned Remotely Powered Ground Vehicles - CA Gov't Code §7070(c)(l) Quantity Owned/Sought: 1 owned
Equipment Capabilities: Vehicles are capable of being remotely navigated to provide scene information and intelligence in the form of video and still images transmitted to first responders.

Manufacturer Product Description:

PACBOT robot model#B82590: Multi mission tactical mobile robot developed by Endeavor Robotics.

Capable of performing surveillance and reconnaissance for first responders and capable of performing in any type of weather. Robot is controlled remotely with joysticks and cameras viewed on a laptop computer.

Purpose/Authorized Uses: To enhance the safety of potentially dangerous situations by providing first responders with the ability to capture video and still images of hazardous areas prior to, or in lieu of, sending in personnel.

Fiscal Impacts: None. Equipment acquired through the federal government 1033 program.

Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: The use of unmanned, remotely piloted, powered ground vehicles potentially involves privacy considerations. Absent a warrant or exigent circumstances operators and observes shall adhere to all applicable privacy laws and shall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g. residence, yard, or enclosure).

Training Required: Prior to piloting any unmanned remotely powered ground vehicles, staff members must complete all required training.

Compliance: The Chief of Police will ensure compliance with the military use policy. Violations of this policy will be dealt with according to department policies.

Other Notes: Life Span approximately 10 years.

Page 3 of 4 ends

Equipment Type: 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions - CA Gov't Code §7070(c) (14)
Quantity Owned/Sought: 1 owned I Lifespan: Approximately 15 years Equipment Capabilities: The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing 40mm Kinetic Energy Munitions, which are essentially rubber projectiles.

Manufacturer Product Description: Exact Impact 40MM launchers are light weight, versatile and used worldwide by police and corrections officers. The 40MM launcher family of products is available in single-shot, spring-advance multi, and pump-advance multi-versions.

Purpose/Authorized Uses: The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less lethal use of force option.

Fiscal Impacts: The initial cost of this equipment was approximately $2,100. The ongoing costs for munitions will vary and maintenance is conducted by departmental staff.

Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force. Various San Bruno Police Department Policies on Use of Force and Crowd Control.

Training Required: Officers must complete a department certified 40mm course as well as regular training and qualifications as required by law and policy.

Compliance: The Chief of Police will ensure compliance with the military use policy. Violations of this policy will be dealt with according to department policies.

Other Notes: None.

Page 4 of 4 ends

Equipment Type: Flashbang grenades, explosive breaching tools, tear gas and pepper balls - CA Gov't Code §7070(c)(12)
Quantity Owned/Sought: 5 bodies & 10 reloads I Lifespan: Unknown.

Equipment Capabilities: Capable of creating explosive distractions.

Manufacturer Product Description: DefTec
Purpose/Authorized Uses: Typically known as "flashbangs" are non-bursting, non-fragmenting multibang device that produces a thunderous bang with an intense bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during high-risk entry, hostage rescue, room entry or high-risk arrest situation.

Fiscal Impacts: Each body (model #260/8933) cost $55 but are reusable if recovered. The reloadable inserts are approximately $20 each.

Legal/Procedural Rules Governing Use: The use of distractions devices to be lawful, will generally need to be supported by a search or arrest warrant, or exigent circumstances. Distractionary devices can only be deployed in accordance with all applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force, crowd control, etc.

Training Required: Only members of the Reedley Police Department who have been properly trained may deploy distraction devices. Use of any distraction device must be documented within a police report.

Compliance: The Chief of Police will ensure compliance with the military use policy. Violations of this policy will be dealt with according to department policies.

Other Notes: None
Policy Reedley Police Department
708 Reedley PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
708.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of specific equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
708.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body - The elected or appointed body that oversees the Agency.

Military equipment- Includes but is not limited to the following:

Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.

Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.

High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.

Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants.

Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.

Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.

Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.

Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.

Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 3051 O and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.

Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.

Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.

Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.

TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).

Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.

Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Published with permission by Reedley Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 1 Reedley Police Department
Reedley PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Notwithstanding Government Code § 7070 paragraphs (1) through (15), "Military Equipment" does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.
708.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Reedley Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to specific equipment. 708.3 SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the specific equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the specific equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as specific equipment in the current possession of the Agency, or the equipment the Agency intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all specific equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use specific equipment within the jurisdiction of Reedley Police Department (Government Code § 7071 ). (e) Preparing for. scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual specific equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of specific equipment. and how the Agency will respond in a timely manner.
708.4 SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Agency:
[Insert attachment here]
708.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the specific equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed specific equipment policy is Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/03/11, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Reedley Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 2 Reedley Police Department
Reedley PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the specific equipment at issue (Government Code§ 7071 ). The specific equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code§ 7071):
(a) Requesting specific equipment made available pursuant to 1 0 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for specific equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring specific equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
{d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of specific equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing specific equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of specific equipment.
(g) Acquiring specific equipment through any means not provided above. 708.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Specific equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the specific equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy.

Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this jurisdiction shall comply with their respective military use policies in rendering mutual aid. 708. 7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a specific equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a specific equipment report to the governing body for each type of specific equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the specific equipment is available for use (Government Code§ 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual specific equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the specific equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of specific equipment in department inventory. 708.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Agency shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Agency should discuss the report and respond to general questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of specific equipment.

Published with permission by Reedley Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 3 Reedley Police Department
Reedley PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070(d)(7), members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of Military Equipment in this policy by any of the following means:

1.) Via email to: [email protected]

2.) Via phone call to: (559) 637-4200 ext. 293

Published with permission by Reedley Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment - 4 DATE: April 12, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
[8J Receive/Review
ITEM NO: _q __
TITLE: QUARTERLY EXPENSE & TRAVEL REPORT FOR ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS - JANUARY 1, 2022 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2022 SUBMITTED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manage
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and review the quarterly expense & travel report for elected and appointed officials as required by Resolution No. 2018-091 that established an Expense Reimbursement and Travel/Conference Policy for Elected and Appointed Legislative Body Officials.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Expense Reimbursement and Travel/Conference Policy for Elected and Appointed Legislative Body Officials provides that, official travel and credit card expense reports shall be provided quarterly to the City Council as a receive & review item on the Council's agenda.

There was no City-paid travel and/or other expenses incurred by Elected or Appointed Legislative Body Officials for the period of January 1 through March 31, 2022.

BACKGROUND
It is in the best interests of the City that elected that elected and appointed officials remain informed and trained in activities, developments and professional trends affecting the affairs of the City, and that attendance at institutes, hearings, meetings, conferences, or other gatherings is of value to the City and its citizens. The Expense Reimbursement and Travel/Conference Policy applies to City Councilmembers and all appointed legislative body officials including Planning Commissioners, and other volunteer members of City boards, commissions, and committees.

The Policy is designed to provide guidance to elected and appointed legislative body officials on the use and expenditure of City resources, as well as the standards against which those expenditures will be measured, all in compliance with the requirements of AB 1234 (Government Code§§ 53232.2, 53233.3).

After being sworn in, any elected or appointed legislative official of the City is required to sign a statement formally acknowledging receipt and acceptance of the policy.

Reedley's River City Theater
Report to the City of Reedley
Marquee Laita
March 15th, 2022
• September 2021
o Rehearsals for Legends: Grand Ole Opry finished as they had opening weekend September 17th. The show was attended by 698 patrons. • This Production picked up from our 2020 season post
COVID-19
• Reedley Residents made up the cast for this production with a few sprinkled in from surrounding cities, such as Selma and Fresno
• Directorial Debut for Reedleyite Rite Crystal Laita
• Legends: Grand Ole Opry welcomed new faces to the stage • Hobbs Grove and Salwasser Farms co sponsored this
production
• October 2021
o Closing weekend for Legends: Grand Ole Opry was October 4th o Auditions for our winter production of Sister Act took place • Reedley Residents and surrounding cities made up the cast for this production, where the ages ranged from 19 years old to 65 years old
o Pancake Breakfast took place before the Reedley Fiesta October 9th, bringing in a lot of new faces and revenue considering being closed due to COVID-19
o Reedley Fiesta Parade took place where RCTC participated going along with the theme "Take Flight Reedley" RCTC's float was "The Flying Nun Themed"
• Through this we generated new volunteers and promoted the opening for Sister Act
• November 2021
o RCTC Board spent an entire Saturday working with a consultant to set future goals and plans for the Theater Company
o There was a workday where all of the costumes were moved from the basement to the storage facility on G street known as "The Loft" • Approximately 185 costumes were moved, along with 8-11 racks
• Approximately 94 steps were climbed this workday
• December 2021
o Opening of Sister Act took place as well as closing the show ran from December 3rd-December 19th. Sister Act was attended by 1222 patrons.
• Valley Control was a full show sponsor for this production o We announced our 2022 season this month
• Received a good review from patrons and season ticket holders o Auditions for Southern Fried Funeral took place
• Reedley residents as well as surrounding city residents made up majority of cast
• Very diverse cast with different backgrounds and a wide range of ages
o RCTC Members went caroling amongst Reedley Neighborhoods and surrounding towns
7:23AM
03/29/22
Cash Basis
Reedley's River City Theatre Company
Profit & Loss
September through December 2021:

Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
Pancake Breakfast Sales
Production Income
Bar Sales
Dessert Sales
Dinner
Production Sponsor
Season Tickets
Special Safe Item
Ticket Sales
Total Production Income
Rental Income
SHARES Card
Total Income
Gross Profit
Expense
Advertising
Bank Ser &CC charges
Food/Beverage
Desserts
Dinners
Linens
Food/Beverage - Other
Total Food/Beverage
Insurance
Workman's Comp Insurance
Total Insurance
Offi~
Equipment
Office Phone
Equipment - Other
Total Equipment
Info System
Box Office Processing
Info System - Other
Total Info System
Supplies
Printing
Supplies - Other
Total Supplies
Office - Other
Total Office
Payroll Expenses
Wages Expense
Total Payroll Expenses
Sep- Dec 21
1,369.54
1,190.00
1,030.98

67.00 5,000.00
450.00
1,929.07
15,922.28
25,589.33
3,950.00

8.61 30,917.48
30,917.48
2,571.40
656.61
1,220.15
272.96
330.00
465.68
4,721.12
467.63
4,813.37
424.00
424.00
5,281 .00
456.95

42.49 119.99
522.25
499.44
642.24
108.34
6,531.02
3,724.11
3,724.11

Page 1 ends

7:23AM
03/29/22
Cash Basis
Reedley's River City Theatre Company
Profit & Loss
September through December 2021
Production Expenses
Costumes
Costume Labor
Costumes - Other
Total Costumes
Direction
Mileage
Music
Music Staff
Music - Other
Total Music
Production Materials
Production Staff
Royalities
Sets
Production Expenses - Other
Total Production Expenses
Professional Fees
Consulting
Total Professional Fees
Rent ExpenseStorage
Rent Expense - Other
Total Rent Expense
Repairs and Maintenance
Disposal
Janitor Supplies
Repairs and Maintenance - Other
Total Repairs and Maintenance
Telephone
Total Expense
Net Ordinary Income
Other Income/Expense
Other Income
Contributions
Fundraiser
Hat Fundraiser
Total Fundraiser
Total Contributions
Grants
Total Other Income
Net Other Income
Net Income
Sep- Dec 21
100.00
'1,574.24
1,674.24
1,350.00

75.00 100.00
258.03
358.03
369.3¢
469.76
1,170.76
553.45
2,703.72
8,724.30
575.00
575.00
405.00
3,304.87
1,463,00
3,709.87
921.80

53.24 690.00
1,665.04
468.24
31 ,338.38
-420.90
1,463.00
1,463.00
24,099.53
25,562.53
25,562.53
25,141.63

Page 2 ends

Reedley City CouncilApril 12, 2022

Reedley City Council
April 12, 2022