Reedley City Council
August 9, 2022

ALL CELL PHONES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES MUST BE

TURNED OFF IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.

TUESDAY, August 9, 2022
Meeting Held in the Council Chambers
845 "G" Street, Reedley, California
www.reedley.ca.gov
The Council Chambers are accessible to the physically disabled. Requests for additional accommodations for the disabled, including auxiliary aids or to request translation services, should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at 637-4200 ext. 212.

Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a Council meeting or hearing, no documents shall be accepted for Council review unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk by the close of business one day prior to said Council meeting/hearing at which the Council will consider the item to which the documents relate, pursuant to the adopted City Council Protocols.

The meeting will be webcast and accessed at: http://www.reedley.com/livestream.php *PLEASE SEE LAST PAGE OF AGENDA FOR ZOOM PARTICIPATION INSTRUCTIONS* Robert Beck, Mayor Pro Tern
Ray Soleno, Council Member

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mary L. Fast, Mayor
Anita Betancourt, Council Member
Matthew Tuttle, Council Member
INVOCATION- Pastor Matt Harder, Reedley Mennonite Brethren Church

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS

PRESENTATION

1. RECOGNITION OF COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT 0. BECK FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE

COMMUNITY
PUBLIC COMMENT - Provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items of interest to the public within the Council's jurisdiction and which are not already on the agenda this evening. It is the policy of the Council not to answer questions impromptu. Concerns or complaints will be referred to the City Manager's office. Speakers should limit their comments to not more than three (3) minutes. No more than ten (10) minutes per issue will be allowed. For items which are on the agenda this evening, members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the Council as each item is brought up for discussion.

NOTICE TO PUBLIC
CONSENT AGENDA items are considered routine and a recommended action for each item is included, and will be voted upon as one item. If a Councilmember has questions, requests additional information, or wishes to comment on an item, the vote should not be taken until after questions have been addressed or comments made, and the public has had an opportunity to comment on the Consent Agenda items. If a Councilmember wishes to have an item considered individually or change the recommended action, then the item should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. A Councilmember's vote in favor of the Consent Agenda is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Motions in favor of the Consent Agenda are deemed to include a motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance on the Consent Agenda. For adoption of ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 2-7) Motion 2nd
---- -----

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 2022 - (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

3. APPROVAL FOR TRAVEL AND CONFERENCE RELATED EXPENSES FOR COUNCIL

MEMBER TUTTLE TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SEPTEMBER 2022- (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

4. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN OUTSIDE CITY

WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9551 SOUTH ZUMWALT AVENUE- (Community Development, Engineering & Public Works)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

5. APPROVE THE CITY OF REEDLEY PARTNERSHIP WITH FRESNO STREET EATS TO PROVIDE A FOOD TRUCK EVENT ON AUGUST 19, 2022 AT PIONEER PARK- (Community Services & Community Development)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

6. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-071 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING REVISIONS TO THE CITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM- (Engineering)
Staff Recommendation: Approve
2 7. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-073 AUTHORIZING THE ADDITION OF ONE (1) FULL

TIME OFFICE ASSISTANT POSITION TO SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL PURCHASING

RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN THE EXPANDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAMS (ELOP)- (Community Services)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCES - With respect to the approval of ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council Member that the ordinance be read in full, further reading of the ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

8. CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH MANNING AVENUE ANNEXATION APPLICATION NO. 2020-01
A. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-075, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT NO. 2020-15, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, DATED JUNE 2, 2022, AND APPROVING ANNEXATION APPLICATION NO. 2020-01, PRE-ZONE APPLICATION NO. 2020-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 2022-05, AND VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6408
B. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2022-004, AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING PRE-ZONE APPLICATION NO. 2020-01 AND AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF

THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
C.ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-076, A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY

THE CITY OF REEDLEY REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY

FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE

MANNING AVENUE REORGANIZATION
Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Community Development)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS

9. APPROVE ITEMS RELATED TO CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 3
A. ACCEPT RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT BECK
B. DISCUSS AND DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH ACTIONS TO FILL VACANT DISTRICT 3 COUNCILMEMBER SEAT BY APPOINTMENT OR

SPECIAL ELECTION
Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Administration)
Staff Recommendation: Approve
3 10.CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE REEDLEY RETIREE HEALTHCARE PLAN
A. RECEIVE & REVIEW THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT OF THE REEDLEY RETIREE HEALTHCARE PLAN (No Action)
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-074 AMENDING AND RESTATING THE

TIERED MEDICAL BENEFIT STRUCTURE FOR CITY OF REEDLEY

RETIREES INCREASING THE CITY'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS ELIGIBLE

DEPENDENT COVERAGE
Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Administrative Services)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

RECEIVE INFORMATION & REPORTS
These items are formal transmittals of information to the Reedley City Council. They are not voted upon by the Reedley City Council. Members of the public who have questions on these items are suggested to call City staff members during regular business hours.

11.REEDLEY'S RIVER CITY THEATRE COMPANY, PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1 - JUNE 30, 2022- Community Services

12.REEDLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2022 - Community Services

13. REEDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 7, 2022 - Community Development

COUNCIL REPORTS

14.BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.

STAFF REPORTS

15. UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

CLOSED SESSION

16. Government Code Section 54957
THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES; CONSIDERATION OF TACTICAL

RESPONSE PLAN
Consultation with: Jose L. Garza, Chief of Police

17. Government Code Section 54956.8

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 100 N. East Avenue
Agency Negotiator: City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Boys and Girls Club
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
4 18.GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
Conference with Labor Negotiators
Agency Representatives: City Manager & Assistant City Manager Employee Organization: Unrepresented

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing revised agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 4th day of August 2022.

Zoom Participation:

The City Council is encouraging members of the public to observe and participate in the Council meeting virtually, to maximize the safety of all meeting participants. Reasonable efforts will be made to allow written and verbal comments from participants communicating with the host of the virtual meeting. To do so, participants may "raise their hand" during public comment portions of the meeting using the electronic feature on the zoom program, and the City Clerk will inform the Mayor of the participant's desire to provide public comment. Due to the new, untested format of these meetings, the City cannot guarantee that participants who wish to provide public comment, either in writing or verbally, will occur as expected. The "chat" feature on Zoom will not be monitored or used during the meeting.

Members of the public who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at [email protected] at least two (2) hours prior to the start of the meeting to ensure that the comments will be available to the City Council. Please indicate the agenda item number to which the comment pertains. Written comments that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the meeting. A copy of any written comment will be provided to the City Council at the meeting. Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting, but will be included with the meeting minutes.

Dates to Remember:

August 23, 2022-Dark
September 7-9 2022-League of California Cities Annual Conference, Long Beach September 13, 2022- Regular Council Meeting
September 27, 2022-Regular Council Meeting
5 #2
REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 26, 2022
A complete audio record of the minutes is available at www.reedley.ca.gov The meeting of Reedley City Council called to order by Mayor Fast at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 26, 2022 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California.

INVOCATION - Pastor Ron Robertson, Full Gospel Tabernacle

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Betancourt

ROLL CALL
Council Members

Present:

Absent:

Anita Betancourt, Ray Soleno, Matthew Tuttle, Mary Fast Robert Beck.

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
Council Member Betancourt motioned, Council Member Tuttle seconded to accept and approve agenda.

Motion unanimously carried.

PRESENTATION

1. UPDATE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM LITTLE LEAGUE LEADERSHIP President, Joel Booth discussed the history of Reedley Little League and where they would like to go in the future.

PUBLIC COMMENT
None.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 2-10)
Council Member Tuttle asked for item 5 to be removed Mayor Fast requested item IO also be removed.

Council Member Tuttle said on item 5 he wanted to share his excitement on this project and how he believes it will greatly benefit the community.

Mayor Fast asked to discuss item IO prior to the vote. Mayor Fast said she wanted to clarify the city was able to use 3 years of funding that is received from the Federal Aviation Administration in order to accomplish one big project.

Community Services Director, Sarah Reid answered Mayor and Council's questions and discussed upcoming project.

Council Member Betancourt moved, Council Member Tuttle seconded to accept, approve and adopt all items listed under the CONSENT AGENDA.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2022. - Approved

3. APPROVAL FOR TRAVEL AND CONFERENCE RELATED EXPENSES FOR MAYOR FAST TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SEPTEMBER 2022- Approved

4. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-045 AMENDING THE 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $186,533 IN THE GENERAL FUND TO COVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPANDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) AT TL REED AND WASHINGTON SCHOOL SITES-Approved

5. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-062 AMENDING THE 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $158,148 IN THE GENERAL FUND TO COVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REPLACING THE PLAYGROUND RUBBER FALL SURF ACE AT THE SPORTS PARK-Approved REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 26, 2022

6. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-064 AMENDING THE 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $34,715 IN FUND 027 AND $12,234 IN THE GENERAL FUND TO COVER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SENIOR CON GREGA TE MEAL PROGRAM -Approved

7. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-066 DECLARING LISTED POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLES AND AIRPORT WEATHER SENSORS AS SURPLUS EQUIPMENT-Approved

8. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-067, DESIGNATING A VOTING DELEGATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING-Approved

9. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-068, AMENDING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY-Approved

10. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (AIP) FOR THE AIRPORT APRON CONSTRUCTION PROJECT:

A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-069 APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT

APPLICATION AND ALL PERTAINING DOCUMENTS TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION

ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CAL TRANS)
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-070 AMENDING THE CITY OF REEDLEY 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $1,763,311 IN THE AIRPORT ENTERPRISE ACCOUNT FUND 041
-Approved

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS

11. APPROVE THE TWO CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR NEW MURALS WHICH WILL BE PLACED ON THE

BACK OF REEDLEY LOCK AND LEA VE STORAGE ON THE REEDLEY PARKWAY Community Services Director, Sarah Reid explained that the Reedley Parkway Committee has worked with Reedley College and Reedley High School art professors in the past to have students submit conceptual designs for murals. The existing murals are located on the Reedley Parkway close to Dinuba A venue on the back side of Reedley Lock and Leave Storage. A project was scheduled by Reedley High School for the spring of 2020 but due to Covid the project was canceled. Staff reached out to Reedley High School this past fall but at that time there was no interest in revisiting the project. The City partnered with Sierra Kings Health Care District for Mental Awareness Month in May. One of the programs for Mental Health Awareness month was a citywide call for artists to submit a conceptual design for a mural to go on the Reedley Parkway. The Community Services Department received three applications. The applications were reviewed by members of the Reedley Parkway Committee who recommended two out of the three designs to move forward for consideration.

Council Member Betancourt moved, Council Member Soleno seconded to accept, and: APPROVE THE TWO

CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR NEW MURALS WHICH WILL BE PLACED ON THE BACK OF REEDLEY

LOCK AND LEAVE STORAGE ON THE REEDLEY PARKWAY
AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Betancourt, Soleno, Tuttle, Fast.

None.

None.

Beck.

12. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-072 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

SUPPORTING THE MEASURE C RENEW AL EXPENDITURE PLAN PARKWAY City Manager, Nicole Zieba explained that Measure C is a sales tax first approved by voters in 1986 and renewed by voter in 2006 and it funds transportation related matters in Fresno County. Each city within Fresno County and the County itself, benefit from the Measure. Measure C provides approximately $800,000 each year to the City of 2 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 26, 2022
Reedley. The new Renewal Expenditure plan is expected to provide three to four time that amount to the City each year, due to its new focus on neighborhood streets and roads rather than highways. On July 7, 2022 the Fresno Council of Governments Policy Board approved by a split vote the Measure C Renewal Expenditure Plan. The plan approved by Council of Governments included a number of changes proposed by the City of Fresno. Due to the last-minute nature of the proposed changes, there was little time for each city's representative to review the changes proposed by Fresno and adopted by Council of Governments. On July 20, 2022 the Fresno County Transportation Authority Board considered and adopted the approved plan. The Fresno County Transportation Authority and the Council of Governments staff believe it is prudent to present the plan as approved and adopted by the two boards to each of the 15 cities in Fresno County.

Council Member Tuttle moved, Council Member Soleno seconded to accept, and: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022- 072 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY SUPPORTING THE MEASURE C RENEWAL

EXPENDITURE PLAN PARKWAY
A YES: Tuttle, Soleno, Betancourt, Fast.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: Beck.

WORKSHOP

13. UPDATE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FROM MID VALLEY DISPOSAL Mid Valley Disposal reflected on changes that were implemented from the past year including the residential reroute where all 3 carts would be collected on the same day. Mid Valley Disposal also exchanged all residential and commercial containers in Reedley. They also discussed the community events and outreach events they have conducted with the community. There was two clean up events where they serviced over 1,000 vehicles and collected over 250 mattresses. During the cleanup events they distributed organic pails to the community. Mid Valley Disposal also discussed SB 1383 and the status of implementation.

Carrie Gutierrez with Mainstreet Cafe inquired about SB 13 83 and organic waste disposal. Staff from Mid Valley Disposal answered Ms. Gutierrez's questions.

COUNCIL REPORTS

8. BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.

Council Member Soleno:
• Discussed the play he attended at the Opera House
Mayor Fast
• Attended the Alive After 5 event at downtown and discussed the firework show • Discussed the most recent Upper Kings Basin meeting and provided an update • Discussed the Council of Governments meeting she attended and provided a brief update • Thanked the Community Services Department for the nice senior lunch program she attended

STAFF REPORTS

9. UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

City Manager, Nicole Zieba
• Discussed the local area neighbors who are on water wells and how some of them are going dry Pete Perez spoke about the water issue and said he will inform inquiring members of the community to contact the City of Reedley for direction.

Community Services Director, Sarah Reid
• Stated the Airport Commission decided they will delay the annual Open House BBQ due to it will be in the middle of the apron construction and will plan for a later time 3 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 26, 2022

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Fast adjourned the regular meeting at 8:42 p.m.

Mayor Mary Fast
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
4 DATE: August 9, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 3 ----
TITLE: APPROVAL FOR TRAVEL AND CONFERENCE RELATED EXPENSES FOR

COUNCIL MEMBER TUTTLE TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SEPTEMBER 2022.

SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Request the City Council to approve the travel expenses related to for Council Member Tuttle attending the League of California Cities Annual Conference in September 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council Member Tuttle is available to attend the 2022 League of California Cities Annual Conference.

According to the City's Expense Reimbursement and Travel/Conference Policy for Legislative Officials, Section 8 of the policy states: "Travel Authorization Process: Conference and overnight travel by a Legislative official shall be pre-approved by having the item placed on the City Council Consent Calendar.

If time does not permit pre-approval, then the Council shall be asked to ratify the approval at a subsequent Council meeting ... "

FISCAL IMPACT
No new appropriations are needed for this reimbursement as limited conference attendance for elected officials is included in the annual City budget.

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
DATE: August 9, 2022
[g] Consent Calendar
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _.....;__ 4 __
TITLE: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN OUTSIDE

CITY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNERS OF REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9551 SOUTH ZUMWALT AVENUE
SUBMITTED: Ellen Moore, City Planner 4(
Community Development Department
/ \0\J-l--
REVIEWED: r ,,-,'-tij.J.t\,.

Rodney L. Horton, Director L./
Community Development Department
REVIEWED: Marilu S. Morales, City Engineer~~
REVIEWED:

APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Director ffe
Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve and authorize the City Manager to sign an Outside City Water Service Agreement with the owners of real property located at 9551 South Zumwalt Avenue.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On June 8, 2022, the City of Reedley ("City") received a written request to connect a residence on real property located at 9551 Zumwalt Avenue (APN 370-060-03) to an existing ten inch (1 O") City water main on Zumwalt Avenue. The property is currently outside of City limits. However, the City would agree to allow the residence to be connected to the City's water main if the property owners agree to and comply with the conditions set forth in the attached Outside City Water Service Agreement. The property owners, Lee and Rosalia Martin, have signed the agreement.

BACKGROUND
Public improvements constructed to serve Silas Bartsch School at the southwest corner of East North Avenue and South Zumwalt Avenue included the completion of a "looped" water system that was installed

in East North Avenue, Zumwalt Avenue, Evening Glow Avenue, and the future Tobu Avenue alignment.

Due to the location of Silas Bartsch School, portions of the water system are located outside of City Limits.

On June 8, 2022, the City of Reedley received a written request from the property owners of 9551 South Zumwalt Avenue, a property just outside of City Limits in the County of Fresno, to connect to an available City water line in front of their residence. In their written request, the property owners stated that they face the prospects of their domestic well failing and are requesting access to the City water line along Zumwalt Avenue for domestic use only. The property owners of 9551 South Zumwalt Avenue previously granted easements to the City on the subject property to accommodate the "looped" water system and other public improvements for Silas Bartsch School, however the closest water line to the residence would be considered to be in the roadway abutting the parcel, which is South Zumwalt Avenue.

Attachment 2 shows the location of the subject property in relation to nearby City water lines. The property is currently outside of the City of Reedley City Limits, however it is in the City of Reedley's Sphere of Influence and is close to City Limits. The frontage of the property along South Zumwalt Avenue is approximately 175 feet north of the current City Limit boundary and the southernmost property line is abutting the current City Limit boundary.

As stated in the Outside City Water Service Agreement (Attachment 1 ), "City is willing to provide water service to Property provided Owners, at their sole cost and expense, hire a licensed professional to install all connectors needed to transport City water to property through the City's existing ten-inch (1 O") water main, located on Zumwalt Avenue, pay all required City connection and service fees, and comply with the provisions of this Agreement".

FISCAL IMPACT
The City will pay the attorney's fees to prepare the agreement with the intent to use the agreement as a template for future outside City service connections as needed. The property owners of 9551 S Zumwalt Avenue are responsible for paying the costs and expenses to comply with the provisions of the Outside City Water Service Agreement.

ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS

1. Outside City Water Service Agreement

2. Water Plat Map Showing Subject Property's Location

Recording Requested By

CITY OF REEDLEY
When Recorded Mail To:

City of Reedley
1733 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Exempt from SB2 fees per GC 27388l(a)(2)(D)
(Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use)

OUTSIDE CITY WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
This Outside City Water Service Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into effective on August 10, 2022, by and between the City of Reedley, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and Lee Martin and Rosalia Martin ("Owners"), with respect to the following recitals, which are a substantive part of this Agreement:

RECITALS
A. City owns and operates a municipal water system and provides domestic water to City residents.

B. Owners owns real property located at the 9551 Zumwalt Avenue, Reedley, CA 93654-9316, Fresno County, California, comprising approximately thirteen and ninety-five hundredth (13.95) acres (APN: 370-060-03), as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property"). Owners desire to obtain necessary approvals on Owners' Property. Owners' Property is within the City's sphere of influence, and is approximately 175 feet north of the current City limit boundary.

C. Owners requested City water service to Property to provide the necessary water supply sufficient to satisfy all anticipated Fresno County conditions of approval. City is willing to provide water service to Property provided Owners, at their sole cost and expense, hire a licensed professional to install all connectors needed to transport City water to Property through the City's existing ten-inch (1 0") water main, located on Zumwalt Avenue, pay all required City connection and service fees, and comply with the provisions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Connection to City's Municipal Water System. Subject to the Owners' full and complete performance of all of Owners' obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement, City agrees to provide Property with water from the City's municipal water system through City's existing ten-inch (1 0") water main, located on Zumwalt A venue. City's obligation is conditioned upon City and Owners obtaining the consent of all applicable governmental agencies including, without limitation, approval of an Extended or Outside Service Application by Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission ("Fresno LAFCO") and obtaining all consents from Fresno County.

Owners shall, at their sole cost and expense, pay for all labor, materials, equipment, tools, and incidentals and related fixtures necessary to transport water from the City's municipal water system to Property. Connections to the water system shall be performed in accordance with City's Water Standard Plan Drawing and Specifications. Owners shall, at their sole cost and expense, hire a licensed plumber to install:
• One (1) one-inch (l ") water service.
• One (1) one-inch (l ") water meter and box, to be purchased from the City. • One air-gap between Property's existing well system and City's provided water system, unless Owners choose to abandon the existing well(s) in accordance with Fresno County Department of Health Standards; or connections to the City water system, if Owners choose to abandon the existing well(s) in accordance with Fresno County Department of Health Standards.

2. Permits and Fees: Owners shall acquire an encroachment and plumbing permit from the County of Fresno, and a copy of the permit shall be delivered to the City Engineering Department.

Owners shall also acquire an encroachment permit from the City. Permit fees will be four and one-half percent ( 4.5%) of the first ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) spent on the cost of improvements installed within City's right-of-way. For any dollar amount spent over ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), three percent (3%) of the additional dollar amount will be added to the permit fees, with a minimum of fifty-two dollars ($52.00).

Owners shall also acquire a building permit from the City. Permit fees will be based on the valuation of the work completed on Property and a Water Facilities Development Impact Fee ("DIF") of one thousand nine hundred eighty-four dollars ($1 ,984.00) will be added to the building permit fees. If a building permit is issued after August 27, 2022, the Water Facilities DIF will be two thousand five hundred and eight dollars and twenty-three cents ($2,508.23) and a water main rebate reimbursement charge of two thousand six hundred thirty-one dollars and twenty-four cents ($2,631.24) will be added to the building permit fees.

3. Water Use. Owners hereto covenant and agree that City water service is intended to serve water purposes for domestic and landscape irrigation adjacent to the home. Owners acknowledge and understand that City water services may not be used for agricultural irrigation.

In the event that City, at its sole discretion, determines that City water is being used for any other purposes than those set forth herein, City may, at any time, discontinue the water service to Owners without liability to City. For this purpose, Owners grant City the right of entry to inspect the use of the water on Property. Owners shall not use City water, and shall not allow another to use City water, for any purpose other than uses of domestic and landscape irrigation adjacent to the home.

If, at any time, City Council determines that there is insufficient water to meet the needs of both City residents and out-of-City water users, City may unilaterally terminate water service to 2 Owners. City may also allocate, among all out-of-City water users, including Owners, any surplus water over and above the needs of City residents, as City Council deems fit. City may also reduce water allocation to Owners in connection with conservation efforts at City's sole discretion.

4. Water Rates. Water rates are subject to changes. Effective July 1, 2022, metered monthly water rates are as follows:

Service (meter) charge for $ 34.28
l " meter;
plus
Commodity charge:
0 to 15,000 gallons $ 1.10
15,001 to 25,000 gallons $ 1.15
Over 25,000 gallons $ 1.20

5. No Representations by City. The City does not make any representation, warranty or guarantee of any kind or nature and hereby specifically disclaims any kind of representation, warranty or guarantee that City's municipal water system and the water supplied thereby will yield any specific volume of water or provide any specific water pressure to Owners' Property under static or demand scenarios or for any use by Owner and its tenants, lessees, purchasers, successors or assigns. Owners assumes full responsibility for the adequacy of the volume of water and water pressure provided by City's municipal water system for any and all purposes and uses related to Owners' Property including, without limitation, sufficient volume of water and water pressure to satisfy County requirements.

6. Continuing Obligations and Responsibilities of Owner. Owners shall comply with all City ordinances and policies governing use of City's water, including Title 8, Chapter 1 of Reedley Municipal Code, which includes, but is not limited to, water conservation restrictions.

Owners agrees to and shall pay City all applicable fees for water and water service supplied by City to Owners' Property. Owners acknowledges and agrees that the water service fees paid by Owners may be higher than paid by other developments and users located within the City.

Owners agrees that the water service fees charged Owners are reasonable and Owners do not object to paying higher water service fees than paid by other developments or users located within City. Owners shall maintain their water service account with City in good standing and current status. If Owners water service account becomes delinquent, City may discontinue water service in accordance with City ordinances and policies.

7. Interruption of Service. Owners acknowledge, agree, and consent to any disruption of water service caused by action of the City. Owners understand that City has no obligation to supply water to Property, either by law or otherwise, except by the express terms of this Agreement.

8. Prohibition on Resale or Transportation. Owners shall not transport any City water off the Property, nor shall Owners resell City water or allow City water to be used by any other person.
3 9. Prior Approval. Prior to the commencement of any City service under this Agreement, the improvements installed for the taking of such water shall be inspected by a designated City representative. The water services provided for under this Agreement shall not begin until each said designated City representative has approved the equipment and installation.

10. Future City Expansion. Owners covenant and agree that upon demand by the City, should City engage in future expansion, Owners will execute water line easements to City or City's nominee, at no cost to City or City's nominee, for the purpose of the extension of water services by City past property owned by Owners.

11. Waiver of Protest Rights and Consent to Annexation. In consideration of the City's agreement to provide water from City's municipal water system to Owners' Property, Owners agree and consent to, and not oppose or protest in any way, or otherwise object to, the future annexation of Owners' Property to the City or by Fresno LAFCO, and to pay Owners' share of all applicable fees and charges City or any other governmental agency may require at the time of annexation of Owners' Property.

Owners further agree that if they or any other person or legal entity hereafter succeeding to Owners' interests in and to Property or a part thereof seeks to protest the annexation contrary to and in breach of the provisions of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to take the following actions:
(a) If a protest to the annexation is filed with City, such protest shall be null and void and shall be disregarded by City in determining the value of all protests to such annexation.
(b) If a protest to the annexation is filed with Fresno LAFCO or any other board or commission, this Agreement shall act as a complete bar to the acceptance and consideration of such protest by Fresno LAFCO or other board or commission at such time as City files a copy of this Agreement with Fresno LAFCO or other board or commission.

12. Covenants Running with the Land. This Agreement and each of Owners' covenants, agreements, promises, representations, and warranties set forth in this Agreement shall constitute covenants running with Property. This Agreement shall be recorded against Property.

13. Successors and Assigns. The covenants, agreements, promises, representations, and warranties set forth in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Owners may not assign their rights and/or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any such consent by the City shall not, in any way, relieve Owners of its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.

14. Voluntary Agreement. The parties represent that each have read this Agreement in full and understand and voluntarily agree to all of the provisions herein. The parties further declare that prior to signing this Agreement each apprized himself/herself of relevant information, through sources of each own selection, including consultation with legal counsel of each choosing if so desired, in deciding whether to execute this Agreement. The parties further represent that 4 they have, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, the legal capacity to understand, agree to, and sign this Agreement.

15. Attorneys' Fees, Governing Law, and Venue. If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and necessary disbursements. This Agreement shall be construed and governed pursuant to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any litigation shall be Fresno County.

16. Remedies. The parties hereto understand and agree that Property and the covenants, agreements, promises, representations and warranties of Owners, which run with the land, are unique and for that reason, among others, City will be irreparably harmed in the event that this Agreement and Owners' obligations under this Agreement are not specifically enforced, and damages will be an inadequate remedy to City. Accordingly, in the event of any breach or default of any term or condition of this Agreement by Owners, City shall have, in addition to any other remedies or claim for damages for such breach or default, and in addition to and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies available at law or in equity, the right to demand and to receive specific performance of all of Owners' obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement. 1 7. Sole and Only Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties regarding said matters.

Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or in writing, have been made by any party or anyone acting on behalf of any party which are not embodied in this Agreement and no other agreement, statement or promise shall be valid or binding.

18. Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

19. Amendment. No change, amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same be in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

20. Authority. Each person signing this Agreement on behalf of any party does hereby represent that this Agreement has been duly approved by the party and personally represents and warrants that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of and fully bind such party.

I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective on the date first set forth above.

CITY OF REEDLEY
By:------------
Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager
OWNERS
By:~'111_~
Lee Martin
By:~~
Rosalia Martin

ATTACH NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FOR EACH SIGNATURE
6 EXHIBIT A
Legal Description Owners' Property
The real property situated in the County of Fresno, State of California, commonly known as 9551 South Zumwalt, Reedley, CA 93654, is described as follows:

PARCEL 1: The North half of Lot 85 of PRDUCERS COLONY, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2 Page 39 of Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of Fresno County;
Excepting therefrom the East 517. 78 feet thereof.

PARCEL 2: The South half of Lot 85 of PRODUCERS COLONY, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2 Page 39 of Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said County;
Excepting therefrom the following described property:

Beginning at the Southeast comer of said Lot 85; thence West along the South line of said Lot, 497 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of said Lot, 175 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Lot, 497 feet, more or less to the East line of said Lot 85; thence South 175 feet, more or less, along the East line of said Lot 85 to the point of beginning. 7 CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of frfSYJ() }
On A11g- 1, 2Ifl2- before me, {Jdh,e Greenlll/ODq No±1112g 0H,C Date . Q Here Insert Name and Title of th fficer
personally appeared Lee andoSJ l l'Cl l\llach n
Name(s) of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satis-factory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ifl/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hf!s'f.e!they executed the same in tfs/~r/their _ authorized capacity(ies), and that by hib1tt'er/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
/J.t!f-, #- ~ IA _;:; Signature __./f:jf;~~IA,/--=-'-'---"U,._,AA./"-=---~ .... -"'----,-------- Signature of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: ____________________________ _ Document Date: ______________________ Number of Pages: ____ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _______________________ _ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Signer's Name:
• Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _ • Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _ • Partner - • Limited • General • Partner - • Limited • General • Individual • Attorney in Fact • Individual • Attorney in Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator D Other: • Other:

Signer is Representing: _________ _ Signer is Representing: _________ _ ©2019 National Notary Association
Silas Bartsch School
liiiii-iii!iii-tt'-i· -4c:i,~ LLLL•---•-•-•-•-•-•-• ---•-•-7 ,#~--\-.._-_:: .._
) ~ : __ _ tl-----t Lu ·..,t_'l l-----t
c;I
~--
!t:l
l
~-
~ ~-
•••••••
House
9551 Zumwalt Ave
••••• II •••• •
•
•
Attachment 2

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
DATE: August 9, 2022
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: .5 ----
TITLE: APPROVE THE CITY OF REEDLEY PARTNERSHIP WITH FRESNO STREET EATS TO PROVIDE A FOOD TRUCK EVENT ON AUGUST 19, 2022 IN PIONEER PARK SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

Sarah Reid (}/ _
Community Services Directo~ ~ -
Rodney L. Horton nm
Community Development Director (LfV \.)
City
Nicole
Manager
R. Zieba (/7 I A .... ~

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the City of Reedley partnership with Fresno Street Eats to provide a food truck event on August 19th in Pioneer Park.

BACKGROUND
City staff met with Fresno Street Eats to discuss the opportunity for a partnership to offer a food truck event on Friday, August 19, 2022, in Pioneer Park. Staff would like to pilot this type of event to gauge the response and interest the public may have for an event like this. Fresno Street Eats has started hosting these types of events in communities similar to Reedley and are having great success with bringing people out to a public space.

If the event is successful, staff would like to continue a partnership with Fresno Street Eats to offer these type of events monthly. The event can include more than just food truck vendors but merchant vendors and entertainment, as well. Due to the lack of staff time to organize and coordinate an event like this, the City of Reedley would sponsor the event but Fresno Street Eats will be responsible for all event details which includes; coordinating the food trucks and entertainment, promotion of the event, cleanup of the park and disposal needs.

Staff will utilize the City of Reedley special event process which will allow all departments the ability to review event details and provide comments for the event holder prior to the event. Fresno Street Eats will be subject to a City of Reedley business license and must provide all insurance documentation.

FISCAL IMPACT
As a City of Reedley sponsored event, all City of Reedley fees will be waived.

DATE: August 9, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ----
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-071 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING

REVISIONS TO THE CITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
SUBMITTED: Marilu S. Morales, P.E. 1 j )A
City Engineer ~'
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-071, approving and accepting the revised City Quality Assurance Program.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
All local agencies that receive federal assistance related to transportation projects are required to have an adopted Quality Assurance Program (QAP). A QAP is a sampling and testing program that will provide assurance that the materials and workmanship incorporated in all construction projects are in conformance with the contract specifications. Failure by a local agency to administer construction contracts involving federal funds without a QAP may result in the loss of or reimbursement of federal funds.

The Local Assistant Procedure Manual (LAPM) suggests that a QAP be updated every five (5) years in order to be current with recommended testing frequency and methods. The City Council of Reedley previously approved a QAP in 2017.

Staff is requesting that the City Council approve and accept this revised QAP. This update brings the City current with new or revised recommended state testing frequency or methods and allows the City to remain eligible to receive federal funds

BACKGROUND
A QAP is required for all federally funded local agency transportation projects. The QAP is a sampling and testing program incorporated into all projects to ensure that materials and workmanship incorporated into all projects are in conformance with the contract specifications and standards. Testing frequency and methods are used to determine the degree of compliance with contract documents.

Failure to have and adhere to a QAP can result in the loss of federal funds. Due to changing industry standards, acceptable materials, and testing methods the LAPM suggests the QAP be updated every five (5) years or more frequently should the recommended testing frequency or methods change. The current QAP was approved in January 2017. An update to this OAP was necessary due to new or revised recommended state testing frequency or methods.

The significant difference between the 2017 OAP and the 2022 OAP is the decreased number of required tests and samples recommended by the LAPM for projects not on the national highway system. Approval of this new QAP supersedes the City's previously approved QAP (dated January 2017).

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to update the OAP for the City.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-071

2. City of Reedley Quality Assurance Program July 2022

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-071

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE REVISIONS TO THE QUALITY

ASSURANCE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley receives federal funds for the construction of roadway projects; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires that all agencies that receive federal aid have an approved Quality Assurance Program (QAP) to ensure that all materials and workmanship used or performed on the job are in conformance with the contract specifications; and
WHEREAS, the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedure Manual (LAPM) suggests that a OAP be updated every five (5) years to remain current with recommended testing frequency and methods; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley QAP is used by the City's certified materials laboratory or consultant's certified materials laboratory; and
WHEREAS, the Quality Assurance Program has not been updated since 2017; and WHEREAS, the Quality Assurance Program should reflect the most current recommended state testing frequency or methods; and
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2022 the City held a public meeting at the City of Reedley Council Chamber, at 845 "G" Street and received a staff report and accepted public comments .

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Reedley, using their independent judgment, approves Resolution No. 2022-071 based on the following:

1. The above recitals are true and correct.

2. The City Council using their independent judgement hereby accepts and approves the revised Quality Assurance Program.

3. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley this 9th day of August 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mary L. Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk

CITY OF REEDLEY

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
July 2022

CITY OF REEDLEY

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1733 NINTH STREET
REEDLEY, CA 93654
Phone: (559) 637-4200
Fax: (559) 637-2139

SECTION

CITY OF REEDLEY
Quality Assurance Program
Table of Contents
PAGE
I. Introduction ........................................... .. ......... ............................... ........... 1

11. Laboratory Qualification ........ ...... .......................... ......................... .. .. ....... . 1 111. Materials Acceptance Program ................. ........... ...................................... 2 IV. Field Sampling and Acceptance Testing (AT) ............................................ 3 V. Testing of Manufactured Materials ...... ............. ..... ..................................... 4 VI. Visual Inspection (For Minor Quantities) ....... .... .... ..................................... 5 VII. Independent Assurance Program (IAP) .. .. .... ...................... ..................... .. 5 VIII. Project Certification . ... .......................................... ......................... ... ......... . 6 IX. Records ............................................................................ ................... ....... 6 X. Acknowledgements/References ...... ..... ........... ........... .... ...... ... ............. ...... 7

APPENDICIES
A Exhibit 16-R Sampling and Testing Frequency Table .............. .. ................ 8 B Exhibit 16-T1: Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications ..................... .. ... ...... ...... ... .................... 11 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022

CITY OF REEDLEY
Quality Assurance Program
I. Introduction
The City of Reedley (hereinafter called the "City") has prepared this Quality Assurance Program to provide assurance that the materials incorporated into each construction project conform to the contract specifications. This Program shall be updated every five (5) years or more frequently should testing frequency or methods change. The following terms and definitions are used in this Program:
• Acceptance Testing (AT) - Sampling and testing, or inspection, of project materials to determine compliance with contract specification criteria. • Certificate of Compliance - A signed document from the materials manufacturer committing that the delivered goods meet the contract specifications. • Independent Assurance Program (IAP) - A program that verifies that AT is being performed correctly by certified testers using qualified laboratories and calibrated equipment.
• Quality Assurance Program (OAP) - A sampling, testing and inspection program to provide assurance that the materials and workmanship incorporated into the construction project conform to the contract specifications. The main elements of a OAP are the Material Acceptance Program and IAP.
• Source inspection - AT of manufactured or prefabricated materials at locations other than the job site, generally at the manufactured location.

II. Laboratory Qualification
The City will use a private consultant materials testing laboratories to perform AT on Federal-aid and other designated projects. The materials laboratory shall be under the responsible management of a California registered Engineer with experience in sampling , inspection, and testing of construction materials. Said Engineer shall certify the results of all tests performed by laboratory personnel under the engineer's supervision. The materials laboratory shall contain certified test equipment capable of performing the tests conforming to this OAP. Laboratories shall comply with Section VI I, Independent Assurance Program, of this document.
1 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022
The materials laboratory used by the City shall provide documentation that the laboratory complies with the following requirements:

1. Correlation Testing Program - The materials laboratory shall be a participant in one or more of the following testing programs:
a. AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL).
b. Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory (CCRL).
c. Caltrans' Reference Samples Program (RSP).

2. Certification Personnel - The materials laboratory personnel shall be certified by one or more of the following:
a. Caltrans District Materials Engineer.
b. Nationally recognized non-Caltrans organizations such as the American Concrete Institute, Asphalt Institute, National Institute of Certification of Engineering Technologies, etc.
c. Other recognized organizations approved by the State of California and/or recognized by local governments or private associations.

3. Laboratory and Testing Equipment - The materials laboratory shall only use laboratory and testing equipment that is in good working order and shall be calibrated at least once each year by an impartial means using devices of accuracy traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. A decal shall be firmly affixed to each piece of equipment showing the date of the last calibration. All testing equipment calibration decals shall be checked as part of the IAP.

Ill. Materials Acceptance Program
Material incorporated into the work shall be accepted by one or more of the following methods, as specified in the contract specifications and this document:

1. Field Sampling and Acceptance Testing

2. Source Inspection and Testing

3. Manufacturer's Certificate of Compliance (with attachments if required)

4. Visual Inspection (for minor quantities)
2 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022
IV. Field Sampling and Acceptance Testing (AT)
General
AT shall be performed by certified materials personnel utilizing accredited materials laboratories and properly calibrated equipment. The certifications and accreditations shall be specific to the tests being performed. Test results for materials incorporated into the work shall be in compliance with the contract specifications. All testing methods and procedures shall comply with Caltrans Methods or a nationally recognized testing standard (i.e., AASHTO, ASTM, etc.) as specified in the contract specifications.

Acceptance Sampling and Testing Locations and Frequencies Sample locations and frequencies shall be in accordance with the contract specifications. If testing methods or procedures are not identified in the contract specifications, samples shall be taken at the locations and at the frequencies specified in Appendix A, Exhibit 16-R Sampling and Testing Frequency Table.

When sampling products such as Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), cement-treated base (CTB), hot mix asphalt (HMA), and other such materials, the time of such sampling shall be varied with respect to the time of day the sample is taken, insofar as possible, in order to avoid a predictable sampling routine.

Reporting Acceptance Test Results
The laboratory shall report test results to the Resident Engineer as soon as possible by FAX, telephone, or email. Copies of complete material test result reports, including data and calculation sheets, shall be provided to the Resident Engineer with the following requirements:
• When the aggregate is sampled at materials plants, test results for Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent, and Cleanness Value should be submitted to the Resident Engineer within 24 hours after sampling.
• When materials are sampled at the job site, test results for compaction and maximum density should be submitted to the Resident Engineer within 24 hours after sampling.
• When soils and aggregates are sampled at the job site:

1. Test results for Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent, and Cleanness Value should be submitted to the Resident Engineer within 72 hours after sampling.

2. Test results for "R" Value and asphalt concrete extractions should be submitted to the Resident Engineer within 96 hours after sampling. 3 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022
V. Testing of Manufactured Materials
Source Inspection and Testing
Some manufactured or pre-fabricated structural materials will be inspected or tested prior to arrival at the jobsite, generally at the manufacturer's location (a.k.a. source inspected.)
Structural items categorized as "catastrophic consequences of failure" or "significant safety concern" may be source inspected. Materials that might be source inspected include: structural steel, precast pre-stressed concrete girders and pilings; RCP greater than 60", joint seals, bearing pads, lighting and signal poles, sign structures, electrical items.

The Resident Engineer may reject source inspected material at the job site if deemed not acceptable, including:
• Material damage in shipment or installation
• Defective material (source inspection is usually a random sampling and may not have checked 100% of the material.)
Manufacturer's Certificates of Compliance
The Engineer may permit the use of certain materials before sampling or testing if accompanied by a certificate from the manufacturer. Said Certificate of Compliance shall be submitted by the Contractor before the material is incorporated into the work and shall include the following information:
• Name of Company
• The project name and/or contract number
• Identify the lot ( or heat) number for each lot delivered • State that the material complies with the contract specs. (w/ spec. number) • Signature of responsible officer of the company
• Test data and other documents when required in contract specification No Certificates of Compliance will be accepted unless given to the Resident Engineer at the time of delivery of the material. Any material that is delivered to the job site and no Certificates of Compliance is submitted to the Resident Engineer at the time of delivery may be subject to rejection at the discretion of the Resident Engineer. The Resident Engineer may perform sampling and testing on such materials at any time. All Certificates of Compliances shall conform to the requirements of the contract specifications.
4 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022
List of Materials Accepted by Certificate of Compliance This agency uses one of the 2010 Caltrans Standard Specifications. A list of manufactured materials that can be accepted on the basis of Certificate of Compliance during construction is found in Appendix B, Exhibit 16-T1: Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Ca/trans Standard Specifications. This list may be supplemented or amended by the contract Special Provisions or Technical Provisions.

VI. Visual Inspection (For Minor Quantities)
Relatively minor quantities of constriction materials may be accepted without testing unless otherwise specified in the contract or by the City of Reedley. The following 3 conditions must be met:

1. Visual examination of the material is performed.

2. The manufacturer or supplier has recently furnished similar materials found to be satisfactory using normal sampling and testing requirements.

3. The manufacturer (or supplier in the case of HMA or concrete) provides certification that the material furnished complies with the contract specifications.

The following list suggests approximate maximum quantities of materials that may be accepted under the conditions indicated above:
• Aggregates other than for use in Portland Cement Concrete, not to exceed 100 tons per day, nor 500 tons per project
• Bituminous mixtures not to exceed 50 tons per day. If the project total is less than 500 tons, sample at Engineer's discretion
• Bituminous material not to exceed 100 gallons per project VII. Independent Assurance Program (IAP)
The IAP shall be provided by the City's certified materials laboratory or consultant's certified materials laboratory. The purpose of the IAP is to verify that sampling and testing procedures are being performed in accordance with the appropriate standards and that all testing equipment is in good working condition and properly calibrated .

IAP personnel shall be certified in all required testing procedures, as part of the IAP, and shall not be involved in any aspect of the AT.

IAP shall be performed on every type of materials test required for the project.

Proficiency tests shall be performed on Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent, and Cleanness Value tests. All other types of Independent Assurance tests shall be witness tests.
5 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022
Poor correlation between acceptance tester's results and other test results may indicate probable deficiencies with the acceptance sampling and testing procedures. When unresolved discrepancies exist, a complete review of the AT shall be performed by the IAP personnel, or by an independent materials laboratory chosen by the City. IAP samples and tests are not to be utilized for determining compliance with contract requirements. Compliance with contract requirements is determined solely by the AT.

VIII. Project Certification
Upon completion of a Federal-aid project, a "Materials Certificate" (Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Exhibit 17-G) shall be completed and signed by the Resident Engineer and included in the City's construction records. All materials incorporated into the work which did not conform to specifications must be explained and justified on the "Materials Certificate", including changes by virtue of contract change orders.

The City shall include a "Materials Certificate" in the Report of Expenditures submitted to Caltrans District Director, Attention: District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE).

IX. Records
All material records of samples and tests, material releases and certificates of compliance for the construction project shall be incorporated into the Resident Engineer's project file. If the project is a Federal-aid project the following requirements shall apply:
• The files shall be organized and indexed per the City's Project File Template and shall include the following :

1. Copy of Quality Assurance Plan

2. Independent Assurance
• Certs. of Proficiency - Testers and Samplers (LAPM Exhibit 16-0) • Cert. of Qualification for Testing Laboratory (TL-0113)

3. Notice of Materials to be Used (LAPM Exhibit 16-1)

4. Acceptance Testing Summary Logs and Test Results

5. Certificates of Compliance, including Buy American Certificates

6. Source inspection records and reports

7. Materials Certificate (LAPM Exhibit 17-G)
6 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP JULY 2022
• It is recommended that the complete project file be available at a single location for inspection by City, Caltrans, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) personnel
• The project files shall be available for at least three (3) years following the date of the final project voucher
• The laboratory shall use a "Log Summary" to facilitate reviews of material sampling and testing completed by the laboratory, and assist the Resident Engineer in tracking the frequency of testing . LAPM Exhibit 16-H or similar can be used to satisfy this requirement
When two or more projects are being furnished identical materials simultaneously from the same plant, it will not be necessary to take separate samples or perform separate tests for each project; however, copies of the test reports are to be provided for each of the projects to complete the records.

X. Acknowledgements/References
California Department of Transportation , "Quality Assurance Program (OAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies", dated January 20, 2011.

California Department of Transportation, "Local Assistance Procedures Manual", dated January 2022.

Code of Federal Regulations Title 23, Part 637, Section 637.205. 2018 Caltrans Standard Plans & Specifications.

FHWA Greenbook Standard Plans & Specifications.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

APPROVED BY: Date: ______ _
Marilu S. Morales, P.E.

City Engineer, City of Reedley
7 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP JULY 2022
l ,ocal Assistance Procedures Manual
Exhibit 16-R Sampling and Testing Frequency Table
for projects OFF the SHS
Sample for Local Agency QAPs
Sampling and Testing Frequency Table
, for projects OFF the SHS.

HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) /ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC)
Quality Characteristic Test Method Minimum Sampling and Testing Frequency Aggregate Gradation (Sieve) CT 202
Sand Equivalent CT 217
1 Per 1000 Tons or Part Thereof; Minimum 1 per day during production/placement of at least 300 tons per day.

Asphalt Binder Content CT 382
In-Place Density and Relative Nuclear (b) 1 Per 1000 Tons or Part Thereof; Minimum 1 per day during Compaction (Nuclear) CT 375 or ASTM D2950 (c production/placement of at least 300 tons per day. (b) Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity CT 309
and Density (Rice) 1 Per Day During Production/Placement of At Least 300 Tons Per Day HMA Moisture Content CT 226 or CT 370
Stabilometer Value (d) CT 366
Asph alt Binder Sample per Section 92 Sample 1 min. per day for production over 300 tons per day; See (f) regarding testing.

Smoothness 12-foot Straightedge As necessary to confirm contract compliance. (a) Exact tonnage of sample location to be determined by Random Sampling Plans (b) Compaction determined by Neclear Density Device. Core testing required if compaction fails the neclear test (c) Correlation between core densities and nuclear device required only if compaction fails the nuclear test (d) Report the average of 3 tested briquettes from a single split source (e) Use CT 309 to determine maximum theoretical density in lieu of CT 367 calculated maximum theoretical density (f) No testing requ ired unless warranted by concern; sample and store until completion of project 8 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP
Exhibit l 6-R
Sampling and Testing Frequency
Location/Time of Sampling
At Plant Per CT 125 (a)
Loose Mix Beh ind Paver Per CT 125
Random Locations Per CT 375 (c
Loose Mix Behind Paver Per CT 125
At Plant Per CT 125
Final Pavement Surface
January 2018

JULY 2022
I ,ocal Assistance Procedures Manual

SUBGRADE (DISTURBED BASEMENT SOIL) OR EMBANKMENT
Quality Characteristic Test Method Minimum Sampling and Testing Frequency Maximum Density and Relative
Compaction
CT 216/CT 231 1 Min. Test per 5000 sq ft under vehicle traveled way and shoulder 1 Min. Test Per 300 linear foot under sidewalk

AGGREGATE BASES AND SUBBASES, IMPORTED BORROW
Quality Characteristic Test Method Minimum Sampling and Testing Frequency Sieve Analysis CT 202
R-Value CT 301 1 Min. Test Per Material Source
Sand Equivalent CT 217
Maximum Density and Relative
Compaction
CT 216/CT 231 1 Min. Test per 5000 sq ft

STRUCTURE BACKFILL, SELECT BACKFILL
Quality Characteristic Test Method Minimum Sampling and Testing Frequency Sieve Analysis CT 202
R-Val ue CT 301 1 Min. Test Per Material Source
Sand Equivalent CT 217
Maximum Density and Relative
CT 216/CT 231 1 Min. Test Per 2 Vertical Lifts of Placement Compaction
9 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
l~xhibit 16-R
Sampling and Testing Frequency
Location/Time of Sampling
Random locations as determined by
the Engineer in place after
compaction.

Location/Time of Sampling
Sample from site stockpile/plant prior
to placement.

Random locations as determined by
the Engineer in place after
compaction .

Location/Time of Sampling
Sample from site stockpile/plant prior
to placement
Random locations as determined by
the Engineer in place after
compaction.

January 2018

JULY 2022
l ,ocal Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-R
Sampling and Testing Frequency

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC) - STRUCTURAL AND SIGNAL/LIGHTING FOUNDATIONS

COARSE AGGREGATE
Quality Characteristic Test Method
Sieve Ana lysis CT 202
Cleanness Value CT 227

FINE AGGREGATE
Quality Characteristic Test Method
Sieve Analysis CT 202
Sand Equivalent CT 217

WET MIX
Quality Characteristic Test Method
Slump/Penetration CT 533
Cylinders CT 539/540

CITY OF REEDLEY OAP
1 min. test per 500 cu yds and per each material source ; 1 min . test on smaller projects; If bridge, 1 min. set per separate pour per abutment/pier/deck.
1 min . test per 500 cu yds and per each material source ; 1 min. test on smaller projects; If bridge, 1 min. set per separate pour per abutment/pier/ deck.

Minimum Sampling and Testing Frequency
2 per day
1 min. set of 3 per day; If bridge, 1 min. set per separate pour of abutment/pier/ deck.
10 Sample from site stockpile/plant prior
to placement
Sample from site stockpile/plant prior
to placement
Location/Time of Sampling
Sample from truck/work site
January 2018
Page3of3
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Exhibit 16-T1 : Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
6-1.04 BUY AMERICA
6-1 .04B Crumb rubber
6-1 .04C Steel and iron materials
11-2 WELDING QUALITY CONTROL
11-2.030 Welding
12-3 TEMP. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
12-3.03A(3) Plastic traffic drums
12-3.20A(3) Type K temporary railing
12-3.23A(3) Attenuator
12-3.32A(3) Portable CMS
13-2 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM
13-9 TEMP. CONCRETE WASHOUTS
13-9.01 C Fabric bags for gravel-filled bags
Plastic liner
13-10 TEMP. LINEAR SEDIMENT BARRIERS
13-10.01 C Fiber rolls
Silt fence fabrics
Sediment filter bags
Foam barriers
Fabric for gravel-filled bags
16-2.03 TEMP. HIGH-VISIBILITY FENCES
16-2.03A(3) High-visibility fabric
18 DUST PALLIATIVES
18-1 .01 C Dust suppressant
Dust control binders
Fibers
20 LANDSCAPE
20-2 IRRIGATION
20-2.08A(3) Polyethylene pipe
Plastic pipe supply line
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC , see specification. 11 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
coc
COC + cert. mill test reports
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
20-3 PLANTING
20-2.08A(3) Sod
Soil amendment
20-5 LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS
20-5.03A(1 )(c) Filter fabric
20-5.030(1 )(c) Solidifying emulsion
20-5.04A(3) Wood mulch
21-2 EROSION CONTROL WORK
21-2.01 C(1 ) Straw
Weed-free straw
Fiber
RECP
Fasteners
Hydraulically applied erosion control materials
21-2.01 C(2) Compost
21-2.01C(3) Seed
21-2.01C(4) Tackifier
Bonded fiber matrix
24 STABILIZED SOILS
24-1.01C(1) Stabilizing agent
24-3 CEMENT STABILIZED SOIL
24-3.01 C Cement
36-2 BASE BOND BREAKER
36-2 01C Base bond breaker
37 BITUMINOUS SEALS
37-1 .01C Asphalt binder
Asphalt emulsion
37-3 SLURRY SEALS AND MICRO-SURFACINGS
37-3.01A(3) Asphaltic emulsion
Polymer modified asphaltic emulsion
Micro-surfacing emulsion
37-2.04 ASPHALT RUBBER BINDER CHIP SEALS
37-2.04A(3) Asphalt rubber binder ingredients
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC, see specification . 12 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
coc
coc
COC + product data
COC + product data & samples
COC + sample & authorization
coc
COC + cert. of quarantine
coc
coc
coc
Submit records
Submit reports
Submit reports
coc
coc
COC + sample
COC + sample
coc
COC + test results
COC + test results
COC + samples & test results
COC + samples & test results
COC + sample & test results
COC + permits & submittals

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
37-5 PARKING AREA SEALS
37-5.01 C Parking area seal material
37-6 CRACK TREATMENTS
37-6.01 C Crack treatment materials
39-2 HOT MIX ASPHALT
39-2.01 A(3)(f) Liquid antistrip
39-2.03A(3)(c) Crumb rubber modifier
Asphalt modifier
39-2.05A(1 )(c) Asphaltic emulsion
40CONCRETEPAVEMENT
40-1 .01C(2) Tie bars
Splice couplers for threaded bars
Dowel bars
Tie bar baskets
Joint filler
Epoxy-powder coating
41 EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT
41-5 JOINT SEALS
41-5.01C Liquid joint sealant
Backer rods
Compression joint seal
Lubricantadhes~es
41-10 DRILL AND BOND BARS
41-10.01C Tie bars
Dowel bars
Dowel bar lubricant
Chemical adhesive
Epoxy powder coating
48-2 FALSEWORK
48-2.01 C(1) Structural composite lumber
49-2 DRIVEN PILING
49-2.02A(3)(d) Steel pipe piles
49-2.03A(3) Structural shape steel piling
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC, see specification . 13 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
COC + sample & test results
COC or sample & test results
COC + sample & production data
COC + test results
COC + test results
COC + test results
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
COC + SOS & instructions
COC + SOS & instructions
COC + SOS & instructions
COC + SOS & instructions
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
COC + submittals
COC + tests & mill reports
COC + test reports

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
51CONCRETESTRUCTURES
51 -1.01 C(3) Bonding materials
51-2 JOINTS
51-2.01A(3) Polyethylene material for snowplow deflectors 51-2.02B(1)(c) Sealant
51 -2.02C(1 )(c) Elastomeric joint seal
Lubricant-adhesive
51-2.02D(1)(c) Joint seal materials
51-2.02E(1 )(c)(iii) Joint seal assembly materials
51 -2.02F(1 )(c)(iv) Material used in the joint seals
51-2.04A(3) Waterstop material
51-3 BEARINGS
51 -3 02A(3)(c) Elastomer for bearing pads
51-4 PRECAST CONCRETE MEMBERS
51 -4.01 C(1) Concrete box culvert
52 REINFORCEMENT
52-1 .01C(3) Reinforcement (rebar)
52-2 EPOXY-COATED REINFORCEMENT
52-2.02A(3)(c) Epoxy-coated reinforcement
Patching material
52-5.01 C(4) Headed bar reinforcement
52-6 SPLICING
52-6.01 C(5) Service or butt splice material
54 WATERPROOFING
54-3 PREFORMED MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING
54-3.01C Preformed membrane sheet
54-5 DECK SEAL
54-5.01C Preformed membrane sheet
57-2 WOOD STRUCTURES
57-2.01A(3) Timber and lumber
Glued laminated timbers/decking
57-3 PLASTIC LUMBER STRUCTURES
57-3.01C(1) Plastic lumber
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC, see specification. 14 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
COC or sample & authorization
coc
COC + test reports & samples
COC + test reports
COC + test reports
COC + authorization
coc
COC + test reports
COC + a statement
COC + test reports
coc
COC + mill test report
COC + submittals
COC + a statement
COC + test reports
COC + submittals
COC + report
COC + report
COC + report
coc
COC + test report & sample

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
58-2 MASONRY BLOCK
58-2.01 C(7) CMUs
Aggregate for grout
Grout
59 STRUCTURAL STEEL COATINGS
59-1 .01C Blast cleaning material
59-5 THERMAL SPRAY COAT STRUCTURAL STEEL
59-5 01 C(1) Wire feedstock
60-3.04B POL VESTER CONCRETE OVERLAYS
60-3.048(1 )(c) Methacrylate resins
Polyester resins
Aggregates
61-2 CULVERT AND DRAINAGE PIPE JOINTS
61-201C Joint systems
Couplers
64 PLASTIC PIPE
64-1.01 C Plastic pipe
65-2 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
65-2.01 C RCP, direct design method
66 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
66-1 .01C Corrugated steel materials
Corrugated aluminum materials
67-3 METAL LINE PLATE PIPE
67-3.01C Metal liner plate pipe
68 SUBSURFACE DRAINS
68-1.01C Subsurface drain
68-2 UNDERDRAINS
68-2.01C Pipe
Tubing
Fittings
68-7 GEOCOMPOSITE DRAIN SYSTEMS
68-7.01 C Geocomposite drain
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC , see specification . 15 CITY OF REEDLEY OAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
coc
coc
coc
coc + sos
coc
COC + samples & test report
COC + samples & test report
COC + sam pies & test report
COC + test results & reports
coc
COC + report
COC + report
coc
coc
COC + mill test reports
coc
coc
coc
coc
COC + flow capability graph

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
69 OVERSIDE DRAINS
69-1.01 C Steel pipe piles
Aluminum
Plastic
70-6 GRATED LINE DRAINS
70-6.01 C Grated line drains
71-3.09 MACHINE SPIRAL WOUND PVC PIPELINERS
71-3.09A(1 )( c) Reel of PVC strip
72-16 GABIONS
72-16 01C Gabion basket
PVC coating
75-3 MISCELLANEOUS BRIDGE METAL
75-3.01 C(1) Anchorage devices
75-3.01 C(2) BRIDGE DECK DRAINAGE SYSTEM
75-3.01 C(2) Fiberglass pipe and fittings
80-3 CHAIN LINK FENCES
80-3 01 C Protective coating system
Posts and braces
81 MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
81-2 DELINEATORS
81-2.01 C Metal target plates
Enamel coating
81-3 PAVEMENT MARKERS
81-3.01C Pavement markers
82 SIGNS AND MARKERS
82-2 SIGN PANELS
82-2.01 C Aluminum sheeting
Retroreflective sheeting
Screened-process colors
Nonreflective, opaque, black film
Protective overlay film
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC , see specification . 16 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
coc
coc
coc
COC + docu. & inspec. report
COC + report
coc
COC + identify
coc
coc
coc
COC + test results
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc
coc

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Caltrans 2018 Standard Material
Specifications
82-5 MARKERS
82-5.01C Metal target plates
Enamel coating
Retroreflective sheeting
83-3 CONCRETE BARRIERS
83-3.01 C Type 60K portable concrete barrier
84-2 TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
84-2.01C Thermoplastic
Paint
Glass beads
Thermoplastic primer

DIVISION X ELECTRICAL WORK
86-1 .01 C(6) Signal heads
Visors
87-2 LIGHTING SYSTEMS
87-2.01C High mast lighting luminaires
90 CONCRETE
90-1.01C(3) Cementitious materials
Blended cement
90-1 .01 C(4) Admixture
90-1.01C(5) Curing compound
90-2 MINOR CONCRETE
90-2.01C Minor concrete
90-3 RAPID STRENGTH CONCRETE
90-3.01 C(3) Aggregate
Cementitious materials
Admixtures
90-4 PRECAST CONCRETE
90-4.01 C(2) and Cementitious materials
90-4.010(2)(a) Precast members (each)
Curing compound
94 ASPHAL TIC EMULSIONS
94-1.01 C Asphaltic emulsion
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC, see specification . 17 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP
Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
coc
coc
coc
COC or test reports
COC + autho., SOS & data sheet
COC + autho., SOS & data sheet
COC + au tho. , SOS & data sheet
COC + test results
COC + test data
COC + test data
COC + test data
COC + app. signature
COC + app. signature
COC + authorization
COC + test samples
COC + weighmaster cert
COC + certified weight
COC + certified weight
COC + certified weight
COC + app. signature
COC + app. signature
COC + test sam pies
COC + reports

January 2021
JULY 2022
Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Caltrans 2018 Standard
Specifications
95-1.01C Epoxy
Exhibit 16-T1
Materials Requiring a Certificate of Compliance per Caltrans Standard Specifications Material Additional Info and/or
Attachments Required*
95 EPOXY
coc
96 GEOSYNTHETICS
95-1 .01C(1) Geosynthetic COC + test samples
* For those materials requiring additional information on or with the COC, see specification. 18 CITY OF REEDLEY QAP

January 2021
JULY 2022
DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
August 9, 2022
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 7 ----
ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-073 AUTHORIZING THE ADDITION OF
ONE (1) FULL TIME OFFICE ASSISTANT POSITION TO SUPPORT THE

ADDITIONAL PURCHASING RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN THE

EXPANDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAMS (ELOP)
Sarah Reid ~ --
Community Services Direc~ -
Nicole R. Zieba I A~
City Manager V f

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2022-073 authorizing the addition of one (1) full time Staff Assistant position to support the additional purchasing responsibilities within the Expanded Learning Opportunities Programs (ELOP).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Reedley has provided services for the Expanded Learning Programs (ELP) at TL Reed and Washington School sites since 2006. Over the years, staff have seen the programs evolve and grow to meet the needs of Kings Canyon Unified School District (KCUSD) and funding priorities has changed . New this year is additional State of California funding designated for ELP. KCUSD is receiving an additional $12 million provided to eliminate waitlists, provide transportation home from ELPs, expand services to include transitional kindergarten (TK) students, and enhance already existing programs with experience and opportunities that previously available funding could not support. From this additional funding the City of Reedley is receiving $300,000 per site which is an increase from $20,000 per site.

This increase will have an impact on the workload for staff within the Community Service Department to get all the paperwork and requirements complete related to purchasing. The impact will also be felt within the Administrative Services Department Accounts Payable division to process the payments. Staff within these two departments are already stretched thin to complete tasks and this becomes an even bigger challenge if anyone is out. Because of this stress on the City of Reedley departments, KCUSD has approved the hiring on one (1) FT Staff Assistant to relieve some of the workload of both departments. This will be the first time an 1 employee is trained to work within both departments assisting with the accounts payable process. This employee will split time between both departments and receiving training by both departments. The Community Services Department still has a need for office coverage, so a portion of this employees salary will be covered by the General Fund.

ELP is supported through different funding sources. The program at TL Reed receives funding from Proposition 49 After School Education and Safety and KCUSD. The Washington school program receives funding from Proposition 49 After School Education and Safety, KCUSD, and Save the Children. Staff is currently working through the Request for Proposal process required from Fresno County Superintendent of Schools for the Proposition 49 ASES funding contracts.

This will come before the City Council in a future meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT
Because the City of Reedley and KCUSD are still working through the details for an amendment to the original agreement, a budget amendment will come before the City Council at a later date along with an amendment to the original agreement. The Community Services Department has budgeted in the 2022-23 City of Reedley Adopted Budget $26,520 for a part time Office Assistant. This action will have no negative impact on the General Fund. KCUSD has agreed to cover the difference to make this position full time, roughly $50,000.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
On May 24,2022, the City Council approved Memorandum of Understanding with KCUSD for services at the school sites of T L Reed and Washington for the 2022-23 school year.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution NO. 2022-073
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-073

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REEDLEY AUTHORIZING THE ADDITION OF ONE (1) FULL
TIME STAFF ASSISTANT POSITION TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-
23 ADOPTED BUDGET TO SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL

RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN THE EXPANDED LEARNING

PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, State of California has approved additional funding to further support Expanded Learning Opportunities Programs (ELOP); and
WHEREAS, this additional funding is meant to eliminate waiting lists, expand the programs to Transitional Kindergarten students, provide transportation from programs, and enhance already existing programs with opportunities that funding could not previously support; and WHEREAS, with the additional workload demands related to purchasing on the City Expanded Learning Opportunities Programs at Washington and TL Reed School sites, the Kings Canyon Unified School District administration has approved providing additional funding for one ( 1) full time employee which will coordinate and oversee the purchasing of experiences, supplies and field trips for both sites; and WHEREAS, this full-time position will be 75% funded through ELOP funding with no additional impact to the General Fund; and
WHEREAS, this position is dependent on the State of California ELOP funding, and would be eliminated if the funding was to be reduced or no longer available for this purpose.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Reedley authorizes the addition of one (1) full time Staff Assistant position to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget for the purpose of overseeing the purchasing aspect of the City Expanded Learning Programs.

This foregoing resolution is hereby adopted this 9th day of August, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mary L. Fast, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
DATE:

TITLE:

August 9, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
~ Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ----

CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH MANNING AVENUE ANNEXATION APPLICATION NO. 2020-01
A) ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-075, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT NO. 2020-15, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, DATED JUNE 2, 2022, AND APPROVING ANNEXATION APPLICATION NO. 2020-01, PRE-ZONE APPLICATION NO. 2020-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 2022-05, AND VESTING TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6408
B) INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2022-004, AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING PRE-ZONE APPLICATION NO. 2020-01 AND AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF

THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
C) ADOPT RESOLUTION 2022-076, A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY

THE CITY OF REEDLEY REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY

FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE

MANNING AVENUE REORGANIZATION
SUBMITTED: Ellen Moore, City Planner ~ Community Development Department REVIEWED:
/ JJ\f\/- ( ,,.,0--'\.. Rodney L. Horton, Director \.__ · Community Development Department
APPROVED:

City
Nicole
Manager
R. Zieba ~ ~

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

A) Adopt Resolution 2022-075, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Reedley Adopting Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15, A Mitigated Negative Declaration, Dated June 2, 2022, And Approving Annexation Application No. 2020- 01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 , Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, And Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 B) Introduce Ordinance No. 2022-004, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Reedley Approving Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 and Authorizing the Amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Reedley C) Adopt Resolution 2022-076, a Resolution of Application by the City of Reedley Requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission to take proceedings for the Manning Avenue Reorganization

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Annexation Application No. 2020-01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 , Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 (previously referred to as Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2021-02), and Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15 pertain to the annexation of approximately 58 gross acres into the City of Reedley. This annexation also proposes to detach the subject territory from the Fresno County Fire Protection District, the Kings River Conservation District, and Consolidated Irrigation District.

The proposed annexation site is bordered by the Manning Avenue/I Street Intersection on the north, the Kings River on the west, residential homes on the south, and agricultural fields/commercial properties on the east (APNs: 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, 368-350-33, 365-072-30T, and 365-072-31 ). See Attachment 1 a. Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 pertains to the development of approximately 13 of the 58 acres proposed to be annexed for commercial use as part of a master plan for the project site.

The Reedley General Plan Update 2030 designates the subject territory with a Community Commercial, Open Space, and Low Density Residential Planned Land Use Designation, and the subject territory is within the City's current Sphere of Influence. The proposed entitlement applications are consistent with the Reedley General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66400 et. seq.) findings can be made to approve Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408. Annexation Application No. 2020-01 is consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Fresno and the City of Reedley. Staff has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project, through Environmental Assessment 2020-15. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines, the appropriate posting, filing and noticing of such has taken place.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site entails six parcels totaling approximately 58 acres. The parcels are Fresno County Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs): 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, 368-350-33, 365-072-30T, and 365-072-31 . Two of the parcels (APNs 365-072-30T and 365-072-31) contain a portion of Kings River. The project site is located within the City of Reedley's Sphere of Influence (SOI) and is currently within the jurisdiction of the County of Fresno. Adjacent to the north, east and south is the City of Reedley. The site is bordered by the Manning Avenue/I Street Intersection on the north , the Kings River on the west, residential homes on the south , and agricultural fields/commercial properties on the east. See Attachment 1 a.

The proposed project would consist of four components and are described in more detail below:
• Annex six parcels into the City of Reedley (Annexation Application No. 2020-01) • Pre-zone approximately 58 acres into the City (Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01) • Develop approximately 13 acres for commercial use as part of a master plan for the project site (Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05)
• Subdivide approximately 13 acres into 10 parcels for commercial use and open space/recreational use (Tentative Subdivision Map Application No. 2021-2)
Annexation Application No. 2020-01: The project would annex six parcels (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350- 31 , 368-350-32, 368-350-33, 365-072-30T, and 365-072-31) totaling approximately 58 acres from the County of Fresno into the City of Reedley. Two of the parcels (APNs 365-072-30T and 365-072-31) contain a portion of Kings River. The proposed annexation area is adjacent to the existing City of Reedley City Limits on the north, south and east sides, and is within the City of Reedley's adopted SOI. The subject property has Community Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Open Space land use designations pursuant to the City of Reedley 2030 General Plan.

Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01: As part of the process to annex the property into the City, the project would pre-zone the site consistent with the City of Reedley's 2030 General Plan as part of the annexation process. Approximately 32 of the 58 acres would be pre-zoned into a Central and Community Commercial (CC) zone district, approximately 11 acres would be pre-zoned to the One Family Residential (R-1-6) zone district, and approximately 15 acres, which includes a portion of the Kings River, would be pre-zoned to the Resource Conservation and Open Space (RCO) zone district (Attachment 1 band 2a).

Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05: The project includes development of the subdivided parcels (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) as part of a master plan located on the South Side of East Manning Avenue closer to the frontage of East Manning Avenue. This master plan includes the proposed development of 10 commercial buildings totaling approximately 56,773 square feet (SF) with a total of 542 parking spaces and 41 bicycle parking spaces. See Attachment 1 c, Exhibit A. The 13-acre master plan development would consist of:
• One drive-thru carwash and 28 self-service vacuum stations (Pad #01 : 5,381 SF) • One coffee drive-thru (Pad #02: 950 SF)
• Up to four drive-thru restaurants (Pad #03: 6,484 SF, Pad #04: 6,764 SF, Pad #05: 3,114 SF, Pad #06: 2,000 SF)
• One canopied gas station with eight dual fuel pumps and convenience store (Pad #07: 5,000 SF) • One four-story hotel with 96 rooms (Pad #08: 55,000 SF) • Two retail shops (Pad #09: 13,440 SF and Pad #10: 13,440 SF) • One temporary ponding basin
The gas station would have a maximum of eight multi-product pumps (16 positions) with an estimated fuel throughput of 2.5 to 3 million gallons per year. The fuel would be stored in underground storage tanks west of the fuel island. The proposed ingress/egress to the site would be available off of Manning Avenue and off of the proposed southern extension of Manning Avenue which would be accessed at the Manning Avenue/I Street intersection. Project landscaping would include areas for tree wells, planters, and associated landscaping within the parking areas. A total of seven trash enclosures are proposed along the main interior road . The proposed master site plan would meet the 25 percent imminent development requirement as part of the annexation process and appl ication . It should be noted that the portion of the Kings River proposed to be annexed to create a logical jurisdictional boundary is not included in this calculation.

The project would also dedicate land directly east of the Kings River that is currently designated as Open Space by the City of Reedley 2030 General Plan for the future development of the Reedley Parkway.

The project would allow for future access to the Kings River as part of a parkway extension, which would

enhance the public's access to views of the Kings River. The 2030 General Plan EIR includes the following policy:

COSP 4.14.3 An open space buffer of approximately 200 feet shall be maintained between urban development and the Kings River corridor. The Planning Commission may approve exceptions to the open space buffer subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) if the finding can be made that the river and riparian areas will not be negatively impacted by the exception.

The proposed project would preserve and allow access to the existing open space adjacent to the Kings River as part of a future parkway extension, however, the applicant is requesting an exception to the 200- foot buffer. The proposed project would allow for a 66-foot access easemenUcommunity buffer west of the project's proposed car wash development that includes a 20-foot buffer for a future parkway extension.

The exception is requested because the applicant's representatives have expressed that visibility along Manning Avenue is very important to future commercial tenants. The proposed master plan has been designed to avoid development in the riparian corridor and Kings River. Furthermore, compliance with Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15 would ensure impacts related to the river and riparian areas would be less than significant.

Tentative Subdivision Map Application No. 2021-2: The project would subdivide four of the six parcels (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) totaling approximately 13 acres into 15 parcels. Nine parcels for commercial use as identified in the site plan for the project, one parcel partially for open space/recreational use, and five remaining parcels for future development included in the annexation to the City. The commercial parcels would range in size from 0.62 acres up to 2.52 acres. See Attachment 1 c, Exhibits B, C, & D.

BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION
Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use
RCO Resource Manning Avenue/I
North Community Commercial Conservation/Open Space and Street Intersection and ML Light Industrial Packing House
Commercial
development along
East Community Commercial CC Central and Community Manning Avenue and Commercial Agricultural fields behind
the commercial
development
RCO Resource Conservation
South Open Space and Low and Open Space, RE Single Family Density Residential Residential Estate, and R-1-9 Residential Homes One Family Residential
RCO Resource Conservation
and Open Space [Inside City
Limits]
West Open Space County of Fresno Open Kings River
Conservation (0) Zone District
[Outside City Limits, within City
Sphere of Influence]

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The project site is located in County of Fresno jurisdiction; however, the project is within the City of Reedley's SOI. The City of Reedley General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Community Commercial, Open Space and Low Density Residential. The existing County General Plan designation is Agriculture. The proposed project would be consistent with the following 2030 General Plan Goals and Land Use Element Policies:

LU 2. 7G Ensure adequate commercial shopping opportunities and office space to meet LU 2.7H
LU 2.7K
LU 2.7L
LU 2.7M
anticipated need for economic development.

Provide for the timely development of planned commercial areas as determined by community needs and the availability of urban services.

Designate sufficient commercial land to accommodate growth for the entire planning horizon.

Provide for the compatibility of commercial land uses with surrounding land uses.

Encourage "big box" retail to locate in the community commercial planned land use designation.

LU 2. 7.40 Community Commercial designations shall be located primarily at the following locations:
(b) Manning Avenue west of Reed Avenue
LU 2.7.41 Community Commercial areas should be concentrated into unified retail centers of five to forty acres in size and shall be comprehensively planned . Visual compatibility with surrounding residential neighborhoods shall be required.

LU 2.7.42 Community Commercial designations shall be primarily at arterial/arterial or arterial/collector intersections to ensure adequate surface transportation accessibility.

ZONING ORDINANCE CONSISTENCY
The project site parcels within the County of Fresno's jurisdiction are currently zoned by the County as Limited Agricultural (AL20) and Resource Conservation (RC40) and Open Conservation (0). The proposed project includes pre-zoning approximately 32 of the 58 acres into a Central and Community Commercial (CC) zone district, approximately 11 acres to the One Family Residential (R-1-6) zone district, and approximately 15 acres, which includes a portion of the Kings River, to the Resource Conservation and Open Space (RCO) zone district. The proposed pre~zoning is consistent with the GPU Planned Land Use and Zoning District Consistency Matrix (GPU , Table 2-4, Page 30). The lots proposed to be subdivided through Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 meet the designation , lot and area requirements for the proposed zone district designations they are in, which confirms consistency with the Reedley Municipal Code.

If Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 is approved and is developed in substantial conformance with the site plan provided , then no further entitlement applications would be required to be submitted. The remaining area to be annexed that is not included in the master plan shall be developed in accordance with the future project area's General Plan Designation and Zoning Designation. Any future project that is allowed by-right pursuant to the Reedley Municipal Code would not require the noticing of surrounding property owners prior to approval.

STANDARDS FOR ANNEXATION
In order for territory to be annexed into the City, the Planning Commission and the City Council would have to authorize an application to be submitted to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo).

LAFCo regulates, through approval or denial, the boundary changes proposed by other public agencies or individuals. If the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Reedley authorize the submittal of an annexation/reorganization application to LAFCo , the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission would take action on the annexation request and record the boundary change if the Commission's action is to approve. The annexation/reorganization application has to be consistent with a variety of documents

and laws, including: the City's General Plan, ordinances, and policies; the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act; and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the County of Fresno and the City of Reedley. As mentioned in the above section, the City of Reedley has determined that the application is consistent with the City's General Plan, ordinances, and policies.

The three main purposes of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act are to discourage urban sprawl, encourage orderly governmental boundaries, and preserve open-space and prime agricultural lands. The City of Reedley has historically taken a conservative approach to expansion of the Reedley City Limits, thus avoiding premature conversion of farmland. The City continues to take this approach. For example, one of the City of Reedley's General Plan 2030 Land Use Policies is to not consider annexation of new territory for residential development until at least eighty percent (80%) of the existing residentially designated land inside the city limits is developed. More than 80% of the existing residentially designated land is developed. The proposed annexation application is adjacent to the existing Reedley City Limits on its northern, eastern, and southern borders, and is adjacent to urban development on these same borders. This demonstrates orderly governmental boundaries and efforts to avoid urban sprawl.

Annexation Application No. 2020-01 identifies imminent development within the subject property, with more than 25% of the area proposed for annexation a part of the proposed development through a conditional use permit, which complies with the standards of annexation (See Attachment 4: Standards of Annexation).

Therefore, this annexation application is consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Fresno and the City of Reedley.

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS (VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6408)
The subdivision map for this project was originally assigned the entitlement number of Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2021-02 by City staff, however since then the applicant requested a Vesting Tentative Map and the County Assessors Office assigned the map the number 6408. Staff will refer to the map as Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 (VTSM No. 6408), but to clarify, the same map is what is being referred to whether identified as Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 or Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2021-02. Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and Reedley Municipal Code Section 11-2-7-A-5, a tentative map shall be approved if the following findings can be made:

1. That the proposed tentative map is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan as specified in Government Code section 65451 .

As noted in the General Plan Consistency discussion above, the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the 2030 General Plan. Further, pursuant to Title 11 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the RMC, the subdivision design meets the zoning ordinance criteria for development in the existing zone district classifications.

2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan.

The proposed subdivision map, with its design and improvements, is consistent with the Reedley General Plan Update 2030 because its design helps achieve many of the General Plan's adopted goals and policies, including ensuring adequate commercial shopping opportunities to meet anticipated need for economic development. The proposed subdivision map improvements are also consistent with the General Plan in terms of circulation and the future buildout of streets.

3. That the site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development.

This site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development, because the conditions of approval prepared would ensure adequate access and drainage on and off the site; and , that development shall occur in accordance with adopted standards, goals, objectives, and policies for development in the City of Reedley.

4. That the site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because the project distributes 10 commercial buildings over 13 acres and includes adequate parking for the proposed commercial uses.

5. That the design of the proposed subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant and unavoidable impacts to fish , wildlife or their habitat.

The subject property has been previously identified for urban conversion, and has been actively utilized in agricultural production , which limited the area's overall ability to sustain and attract wildlife or provide a suitable habitat to species. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO7 in Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15 would reduce potential impacts to biological resources to a less than significant level.

6. That the design of the proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems because the conditions of approval have shown and would ensure that the subdivision conforms to City health and safety standards, specifications, and policies.

7. That the design of the proposed subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

The proposed subdivision design would not conflict with public easements within or through the site, because the project design and conditions of approval would assure noninterference with any existing or proposed easements on the subject property.

8. That the tentative map meets or performs any of the requirements or conditions imposed by the subdivision map act or this title.

The tentative map is subject to conditions of approval imposed by the subdivision map and the Reedley Municipal Code, therefore the development of the tentative map is required to comply with all conditions, standards, and policies.

9. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473 .1, the design of a subdivision for which a tentative map is required pursuant to Section 66426 shall provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision .

The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. Furthermore, the appropriate use and placement of landscaping plant materials would enhance shading and natural cooling opportunities because of the orientation of the proposed lots, which will permit alignment of structures in an east-west or north-south direction for southern exposure, and the design of the subdivision would provide for future passive and natural cooling opportunities.

The subdivision map, subject to the recommended conditions of approval , complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Subdivision Ordinance. Based upon the plans and information submitted by the applicant and the recommended conditions of project approval , staff has determined that these findings can be made. Therefore, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with guiding land use principles, goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan Update 2030 and regulatory standards set forth in the Reedley Municipal Code and its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses. These factors have been evaluated as described above. Upon consideration of this evaluation , it can be concluded that Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 is appropriate for the subject property.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City of Reedley has conducted an environmental analysis for the above-described project

(Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15). The project has been determined to be a subsequent project that is not fully within the scope of the certified Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2010031106) prepared for the Reedley General Plan 2030 Update (GPU). Therefore, the City of Reedley, as the lead agency, proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (attached as Exhibit A) for this project.

The completed environmental impact checklist, the associated narrative, and any proposed mitigation measure(s) reflect applicable comments of responsible and trustee agencies, as well as research and analysis conducted to examine the interrelationship between the proposed project and the physical environment. The information contained in the project application and its related environmental assessment application, responses to requests for comment, checklist and initial study narrative combine to form the record indicating that an initial study has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the CEQA Guidelines.

All new development activity and many non-physical projects contribute directly or indirectly toward cumulative impacts on the physical environment. It has been determined that the incremental effect contributed by this project toward cumulative impacts is not considered substantial or significant in itself, and/or that cumulative impacts accruing from this project may be mitigated to less than significant with application of feasible mitigation measures.

For some categories of potential impacts, the checklist may indicate that a specific adverse environmental effect has been identified which is of sufficient magnitude to potentially be of concern without mitigation to reduce the level of significance. Such an effect may be inherent in nature and magnitude of the project.

The completed environmental checklist form indicated whether an impact would be less than significant, or less than significant with mitigation. Effects so rated are not sufficient in themselves to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report, and have been mitigated to the extent reasonably feasible as required by CEQA. The City has proposed to self-regulate urban growth, which has a direct impact on premature and an unnecessary conversion of agricultural lands, by committing to annexing a maximum of five hundred (500) acres from within the existing SOI (See Policy LY 2.5.18) before implementing the Farmland Preservation Program .

The project is not located on a site which is included on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code including , but not limited to, lists of hazardous waste facilities , land designated as hazardous waste property, hazardous waste disposal sites and others, and the information in the Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement required under subdivision (f) of that Section.

The initial study has concluded that the proposed project would not result in any adverse effects which fall within the "Mandatory Findings of Significance" contained in Section 15065 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

With the project specific mitigation imposed, there is no substantial evidence in the record that this project may have additional significant direct, indirect or cumulative effects on the environment that are significant and that were not identified and analyzed in the certified Program Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Reedley General Plan Update 2030. After conducting a review of the adequacy of the Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2010031106) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3, as the lead agency, finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to circumstances under which the Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2010031106) was certified, and that no new information which was not known and could not have been know at the time that the Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2010031106) was certified , has become available .

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines, a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed with the County of Fresno and with the California Office of Planning and Research (QPR), on June 2, 2022. The comment period expired on July 5, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.

During the comment period , staff received a comment letter from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). SJVAPCD's comments were already included in their previous comment letter dated July 16, 2020, which is attached to the project's Conditions of Approval. Analysis of future projects in the annexation area is addressed in the project's Conditions of Approval. The City conducted an Air Quality Study (May 2022) to provide information for the completion of the Initial Study and to address compliance with air quality standards. This study determined that neither project construction nor operation would exceed the SJVAPCD threshold for criteria pollutants and would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The Initial Study concluded air quality impacts were less than significant in regards to these and staff has determined that no further study or mitigation is needed. Based on CARB's land-use handbook and the type of development, there should not be more than 100 trucks per day or 30 hours of TRU usage per day onsite and therefore the potential for health risk to residents is minimal. Both comment letters from the SJVAPCD were provided to the applicant.

COMMITTEE/COMMISSION REVIEW/ACTIONS
On July 21 , 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on these applications. The Commission received a written staff report and presentation, and invited the public to comment. The Planning Commission asked additional questions of staff and the applicant who was present. No comments from the public were made during the public hearing. After closing the public hearing, the City of Reedley Planning Commission , using their independent judgment, recommended to the City Council adoption of Environmental Assessment 2020-15; approvals of Annexation Application No. 2020-01 , Ordinance 2022- 004 (Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01), and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408, and authorization of the submittal of a City Annexation application to the Fresno Local Area Formation Commission .

PUBLIC NOTICING
Pursuant to the Government Code Section 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) and Reedley Municipal Code, § 10-22, it is required that a notice be published in a newspaper and be sent to surrounding property owners. The public hearing notice was published in the Mid-Valley Times on July 28, 2022 and was mailed to surrounding property owners on July 28, 2022. See Attachment 5 for the Proof of Publication and Public Noticing Map.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project applicant is responsible for all entitlement application fees prior to public hearings associated with approval of this project. The Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission annexation application and processing fees will also be paid by the applicant.

ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS

1. Adopt Resolution 2022-075, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley Adopting Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, dated January 24, 2019, and approving Annexation Application No. 2020-01 , Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 , Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408
a. Annexation Application No. 2020-01
b. Map A: Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-1
c. Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 Conditions of Approval dated July 21 , 2022
i. Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 (Exhibit A dated May 22, 2022) ii. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 (Exhibits B, C, & D, dated March 8, 2022)

2. Ordinance No. 2022-004, An Ordinance Of The City Council Of The City Of Reedley Approving Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 And Authorizing The Amendment Of The Official Zoning Map Of The City Of Reedley
a. Map A: Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01

3. Resolution No. 2022-076, A Resolution of Application By The City Of Reedley Requesting The Local Agency Formation Commission To Take Proceedings For The Manning Avenue Reorganization
a. Manning Avenue Annexation (Annexation Application No. 2020-01) Exhibit "A" - Area of Reorganization
b. Manning Avenue Annexation (Annexation Application No. 2020-01) "Exhibit B" - Geographic Description

4. Standards of Annexation (Exhibit 1 of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Reedley and County of Fresno)

5. Proof of Publication and Public Noticing Map
Exhibit A: Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15) dated June 2, 2022
Exhibit B: Comment Letter Responding to Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15

Attachment 1
Resolution No. 2022-075
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley Adopting Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, dated January 24, 2019, and approving Annexation Application No. 2020- 01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01, Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-075

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2020-15, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, DATED JUNE 2, 2022, AND APPROVING ANNEXATION APPLICATION NO. 2020-01, PRE-ZONE APPLICATION NO. 2020-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 2022-05, AND VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6408 WHEREAS, Annexation Application No. 2020-01 proposes to annex the subject territory (58 gross acres) into the City of Reedley and detaching from the Fresno County Fire Protection District, the Kings River Conservation District, and Consolidated Irrigation District; and WHEREAS, the project site entails six parcels located within the City of Reedley's Sphere of Influence (SOI) and is currently within the jurisdiction of the County of Fresno (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32, 368-350-33, 365-072-30T, and 365-072-31 ). Two of the parcels (APNs 365-072-30T and 365-072-31) contain a portion of Kings River; and WHEREAS, the Reedley General Plan Update 2030 designates the subject territory with a Community Commercial, Open Space, and Low Density Residential Planned Land Use Designation; and
WHEREAS, the pre-zoning for the proposed project identified in Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 is consistent with the subject property's General Plan Planned Land Use Designation; and
WHEREAS, Annexation Application No. 2020-01 identifies imminent development within the subject property through Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, with at least 25% of the area proposed for annexation has planned development, which is consistent with the Standards of Annexation within the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Reedley and the County of Fresno, dated September 7, 2021; and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 pertains to development of APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, and 368-350-33 as part of a master plan located on the South Side of East Manning Avenue closer to the frontage of East Manning Avenue. This master plan includes the proposed development of 10 commercial buildings totaling approximately 56,773 square feet (SF) with a total of 542 parking spaces and 41 bicycle parking spaces . Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 also pertains to the CC Resolution No. 2022-075

modification of the open space buffer between urban development and the Kings River corridor closer to Manning Avenue; and
WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 pertains to subdividing four of the six parcels (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) totaling approximately 13 acres into 15 parcels. Nine parcels for commercial use as identified in the site plan for the project, one parcel partially for open space/recreational use, and five remaining parcels for future development included in the annexation to the City; and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Reedley General Plan, the Reedley Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act as appropriate; and WHEREAS, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with the goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan and regulatory standards set forth in the Reedley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 21 , 2022, the City of Reedley Planning Commission, using their independent judgment, recommended that the City Council Adopt Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15, Approve Annexation Application No. 2020-01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 , Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408, and Authorize the Submittal of a City Annexation Application to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, the project was evaluated and processed in accordance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15 determined that a mitigated negative declaration should be prepared for the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council of the City of Reedley hereby declares that a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared , posted and filed in accordance with State CEQA Sections 15070-15075 by the City of Reedley as the Lead Agency; and
CC Resolution No. 2022-075

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment following the implementation of the agreed upon mitigation measures, and that the prepared mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independent judgement and analysis; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of the Government Code and the procedures of Title 10 of the Reedley Municipal Code, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation on July 28, 2022, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on July 28, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley, at a Regular Meeting on August 9, 2022, held a public hearing to review the environmental assessment, annexation application, pre-zone application , conditional use permit application , and vesting tentative subdivision map application; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received public testimony, oral and written staff report, and independently deliberated .

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Reedley, using their independent judgment, hereby finds and resolves as follows:
1 . The above recitals are true and correct; and

2. The Planning Commission finds that a mitigated negative declaration has been prepared for the project through Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15, and preparation of such has been conducted in the manner required by State CEQA regulations; and

3. The Planning Commission finds that Annexation Application No. 2020-01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01, Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 are consistent with the Reedley General Plan 2030 and the Reedley Municipal Code , and

4. The Planning Commission finds that Annexation Application No. 2020-01 is consistent with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act; and

5. The Planning Commission finds that Annexation Application No. 2020-01 is consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Reedley and the County of Fresno; and

6. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15 , dated June 2, 2022, for the proposed Annexation Application No. 2020-01 , Pre-Zone Application No. 2020- 01, Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408; and
CC Resolution No. 2022-075

7. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Annexation Application No. 2020-01; and

8. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council authorize the submittal of the City Annexation Application to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission; and

9. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01; and

10. The Planning Commission finds that Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 is consistent with the goals and polices of the Reedley General Plan; and

11. The Planning Commission finds pursuant to the Reedley Municipal Code Section 10- 18-7 A, that the Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 conditions have been applied to the land necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and

12. The Planning Commission finds pursuant to the Reedley Municipal Code Section 10- 18-7B, that Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 is in accordance with the purposes of the proposed zone district in which the site is located; and

13. The Planning Commission finds pursuant to the Reedley Municipal Code Section 10- 18-7C, that the Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title; and

14. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05; and

15. The Planning Commission finds that the design or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the Reedley General Plan; and

16. The Planning Commission finds that the site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development; and

17. The Planning Commission finds that the site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; and

18. The Planning Commission finds that the design of the proposed subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant and unavoidable impacts to fish, wildlife or their habitat; and

19. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision design is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and

20. The Planning Commission finds that the design of the proposed subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and

21. The Planning Commission finds that the tentative map meets or performs any of the requirements or conditions imposed by the subdivision map act or this title; and

22. The Planning Commission finds that pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1, the design of the proposed subdivision will provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision; and CC Resolution No. 2022-075

23. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408; and

24. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the attached conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408, dated July 21, 2022; and

25. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley, held on the 9th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN :

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood , City Clerk
Attachments: Annexation Application No. 2020-01
Map A- Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01
Mary L. Fast, Mayor
City of Reedley
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408, Conditions of Approval dated July 21 , 2022
CC Resolution No. 2022-075

MAP A

CITY OF REEDLEY
PRE- ZONE APPLICATION No. 2020-01
··-·_•7
.

I
.

I
. i& ~
. -~
{
.
.
(
. .
\
\ .
.
. \
- -· -- , lJ T -··-··,
,J [r-7
l
r- J . Vi i.__, ,...,
- t_· fr ·--- n. .. J L_q
rJJ . bl ";f
~--:-=---.7. ,_ --· -·- J

LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1"=10,000'
.

I
. .

I
..

Cl
L,J
L,J
Ck::

MANNING A VENUE
' .. ,: .

L,J
::> ' ·Z
~ ",
<
... _ ;>
... ✓ ·'\ ,,.
'~ ,'-. , ,,,--< <,

PRE-ZONE AREA MAP
SCALE: 1"=1 ,000'
LEGEND:
,--··-••-•,
: : REEDLEY CITY LIMITS
'--··-··--' r--··-··~
: : REEDLEY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
'--··-··_J.
\·,,
N
1" = 1000· I

SCALE IN FEET
0 500 1000
- PROPOSED PRE-ZONING: CC (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) (32.10 ACRES) 2000
PROPOSED PRE-ZONING: R-1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) (10.80 ACRES) PROPOSED PRE-ZONING: RCO (RESOURCE CONS. & OPEN SPACE) (15.01 ACRES) (AREA INCLUDES KINGS RIVER PROPERTY)
ATTACHMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-08

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 2022-05 AND
VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6408
(REFERENCE ANNEXATION APPLICATION No. 2020-01 AND PRE-ZONE APPLICATION No. 2020-01)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
JULY 21, 2022

NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT
In accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1 ), the imposition of fees, dedication, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of imposition of fees, dedications, reservation, or exactions imposed on the development project.

This notice does not apply to those fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions which were previously imposed and duly noticed; or, where no notice was previously required under the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) in effect before January 1, 1997.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Assessor's Parcel No.:

Assessor's Parcel No.

Included in Annexation
368-350-17 ( a portion thereof), 368-350-31 ( a portion thereof), 368-350-32, and 368-350-33
and Pre-Zone: 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, 368-350-33, 365-072-30T & 365-072-31
Project Location: 1605 Upper Bridge Road , Reedley, CA
Southern side of East Manning Avenue, between the Kings River and the Manning Avenue/I Street Intersection
Existing Planned Land Use: Community Commercial , Open Space, and Low Density Residential
Proposed Pre-Zoning: CC (Central and Community Commercial), RCO (Resource Conservation and Open Space), and R-1-6 (One Family
Residential)
Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

Project Description: Annexation Application No. 2020-01 pertains to requesting that the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) take proceedings on the annexation of 58 gross acres into the City of Reedley and detachment from the Fresno County Fire Protection District, the Kings River Conservation District, and Consolidated Irrigation District (APNs: 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, 368-350-33, 365-072-30T, and 365-072-31 ). The proposed annexation site is bordered by the Manning Avenue/I Street Intersection on the north, the Kings River on the west, residential homes on the south, and agricultural
fields/commercial properties on the east.

Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 pertains to the pre-zoning of four parcels encompassing 58 acres in preparation for annexation consistent with the Reedley 2030 General Plan. Approximately 32 acres is proposed to be pre-zoned to the CC (Central and Community Commercial) zone district, approximately 11 acres is proposed to be pre-zoned to the R-1 -6 (One Family Residential) zone district, and approximately 15 acres, which includes a portion of the Kings River, is proposed to be pre-zoned to the RCO (Resource Conservation and Open Space) zone district.

Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 pertains to the development of approximately 13 acres for commercial use as part of a master plan for the project site (APNs 368-350-17, 368- 350-31 , 368-350-32, and 368-350-33). The master plan includes development of 10 commercial buildings totaling approximately 56,773 square feet with a total of 542 parking spaces and 41 bicycle parking spaces. The master plan is located on the South Side of East Manning Avenue closer to the frontage of East Manning Avenue and meets the 25% imminent development
requirement for annexation . Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 also pertains to the modification of the open space buffer between urban development and the Kings River corridor.

Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 pertains to the subdivision of four of the six parcels (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350- 31 , 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) totaling approximately 13 acres into 15 parcels. Nine parcels for commercial use as identified in the site plan for the project, one parcel partially for open space/recreational use, and five remaining parcels for future development included in the annexation to the City. The commercial parcels would range in size from 0.62 acres up to

2.52 acres.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21, 2022

GENERAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. Please note that this project may be subject to a variety of discretionary conditions of approval. These include conditions based on adopted City plans and policies, those determined through site plan review and environmental assessments essential to mitigate adverse effects on the environment including the health , safety, and welfare of the community, and recommended conditions for development that are essential to health, safety, and welfare, but would , on the whole, enhance the project and its relationship to the neighborhood and environment.

2. All discretionary conditions of approval will ultimately be deemed mandatory unless appealed verbally or in writing to the City of Reedley Community Development Department.

3. Approval of this special permit shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the applicant and/or the authorized representative, architect, engineer, or designer to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property and the proposed development including, but not limited to, the following :
a. All existing and proposed improvements including but not limited to buildings and structures, signs and their uses, trees, walls , driveways, outdoor storage, and open land use areas on the subject property and all of the preceding which are located on adjoining property and may encroach on the subject property; and b. All public and private easements, rights-of-way and any actual or potential prescriptive easements or uses of the subject property; and c. Existing and proposed grade differentials between the subject property and adjoining property zoned or planned for commercial use.

4. Approval of this special permit may become null and void in the event that development is not completed in accordance with all the conditions and requirements imposed on this special permit, the Zoning Ordinance, and all Public Works Standards and Specifications.

The Community Development Department shall not assume responsibility for any deletions or omissions resulting from the special permit review process or for additions or alterations to construction plans not specifically submitted and reviewed and approved pursuant to this special permit or subsequent amendments or revisions.

5. The applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Reedley and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines , penalties, forfeitures, damages and costs arising from , resulting from , or in connection with a challenge or contest of the entitlement application and/or the project approvals; or claims or allegations of a violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or any another law, rule or regulations in connection with the granting issuance or approval by the City of any or all rights or benefits granted to the applicant under this entitlement.

The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim , action , or proceedings against the City and the Applicant will either undertake the defense of the matter or abandon the Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney.

By a separate instrument, the parties will mutually address the defense of the matter, including but not limited to selection of attorney, attorney's fees, litigation expenses and administrative record preparation costs and deposits.

6. Estimated development impact fees for this project are being provided to the applicant and are due at time of building permit issuance. See Attachment 1. a. The Development Impact Fees provided for this project are only an estimate and subject to change based upon the square footage, residential type and number of dwelling units, submitted as part of the building permit application. b. The developer may contact the Community Development Department, Building Division to request an estimate of building permit fees. At the time of request, the developer must provide at a minimum a site plan, floor plan and estimated building valuation .
c. The developer/property owner may elect to defer a portion of the payment of Development Impact Fees for any lot or parcel until the developer/owner makes a request for final inspection for a building(s) or structure(s) within a residential , commercial, industrial, professional , or institutional development by entering into an agreement with the City. For program details, contact Ellen Moore, City Planner, at (559) 637-4200 x 222 or via e-mail at [email protected] for more information prior to building permit application submittal. d. Development Impact Fee (DIF) credits may be available to developers who fund construction of eligible facilities outside of the requirements of the proposed project pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2015-022 dated March 24, 2015. The City shall determine which facilities will be eligible for developers to construct. Facilities must meet City standards for acquisition projects in order to be eligible for credits.

Developers shall be responsible for complying with all applicable laws, codes, and regulations relating to contracting and construction procedures for publicly funded public works projects.

7. Prior to allowance of final occupancy, Developer shall petition and request that the City annex the subject property (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) into the City's Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 ("CFO") for the maintenance and operation of public services and facilities. See Attachment 2 for more information, including a Sample Petition and Written Consent document to be signed by the property owner and a City Council Resolution identifying the current Fiscal Year's assessments.

Annexation of the property into the City's CFO is a condition precedent to the City's obligation to issue any certificate of final occupancy for development or improvement of the parcel within the scope of CUP 2022-05 and VTSM 6408, and the Developer acknowledges and agrees that if this property were not part of the CFO, the City might Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21, 2022

lack the financial resources to operate facilities and provide adequate public services to the property.
a. Willdan Financial Services (WFS) will serve as the primary contact and liaison between the City of Reedley and the developer and coordinate the CFO annexation process from start to finish. A representative from Willdan can be reached at (951) 972-8106 or via e-mail at cgano@willdan .com. b. The non-residential assessment for these public services is currently $0.26 per building square foot pursuant to City of Reedley, Resolution No. 2022-038. Said special tax shall be levied when a building permit has been issued prior to July 1 of the Fiscal Year and may increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor determined by City Council of the City of Reedley and adopted by resolution . c. The single family residential assessment for these public services is currently $963.00 per dwelling unit pursuant to City of Reedley, Resolution No. 2022-038.

Said special tax shall be levied when a building permit has been issued prior to July 1 of the Fiscal Year and may increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor determined by City Council of the City of Reedley and adopted by resolution.

8. No uses of land, buildings, or structures shall be permitted other than those specifically approved pursuant to Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 and consistent with Annexation Application No. 2020- 01 and Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01.

9. Development shall take place in accordance with all city, county, state and federal laws and regulations.

10. Approval of Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 is contingent upon final approval of Annexation Application No. 2020-01 and Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01. Approval is also contingent upon issuance of a Certificate of Completion for Annexation Application No. 2020-01 by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission.

11. The developer shall pay applicable fees for, but not limited to, plan checks for street improvements and other grading and construction , street signs, water and sewer service, and inspections in accordance with the City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule and any amendments, modifications, or additions thereto, and in accordance with the requirements of State law.

12. Developer shall contact the United States Postal Service for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed on this property.
a. It is recommended that at least 6 months prior to the first occupancy, the Developer shall contact the local United States Postal Service representative to complete a Mode of Delivery Agreement for New Construction. The Mode of Delivery Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

Agreement must have a District approval signature to be valid . In addition to completing the Agreement, the Developer shall provide a final site plan (with address details) to the local USPS representative. The developer shall , at their own expense, procure, construct and install all mail receptacle facilities for each location as specified and approved by the USPS.
b. The developer/owner shall obtain any and all permits required for the removal or demolition of any existing building or structure located within the subdivision boundaries.

13. The exercise of rights granted by this special permit shall commence on the date that the Certificate of Completion for Annexation Application No. 2020-01 is issued by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission.

14. Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 shall expire two years from the date that the Certificate of Completion for Annexation Application No. 2020-01 is issued by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission , pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code, Title 10, Section 10-18-12.
e. Time limits for development may be extended pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code Section 10-18-11 .

15. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 shall expire two years from the date that the Certificate of Completion for Annexation Application No. 2020-01 is issued by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission .
a. Time limits for development may be extended pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code Section 11 -3-11 .

CITY OF REEDLEY DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
Community Development Department:

Planning Division

16. Development shall take place in accordance with the Community Commercial Planned Land Use Designation, Open Space Planned Land Use Designation , and Low Density Residential Planned Land Use Designation, as defined in the Reedley 2030 General Plan.

17. Development shall take place in accordance with the proposed CC ( Central and Community Commercial), RCO (Resource Conservation Open Space), and R-1-6 (One Family Residential) zone districts, defined in Reedley Municipal Code Title 10, Chapter 8, Title 10, Chapter 4, and Title 10, Chapter 6A, respectively.

18. Development shall take place in accordance with Exhibit A, dated May 22, 2022, and Exhibits B, C & D, dated March 8, 2022.

19. Agricultural activities within the limits of the project can remain active until construction activities within the phase that the agricultural activities are set to commence.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

20. Any future by-right use in each subsequent phase of this project not within the limits of Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 shall be subject to the Site Plan Review process and any applicable City or agency rules or regulations. Please contact Ellen Moore, City Planner, at (559) 637-4200 ext. 222 for more information. 21 . Any future conditional use in each subsequent phase of this project not within the limits of Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05 shall be subject to the Conditional Use Permit Application process and any applicable City or agency rules or regulations. Please contact Ellen Moore, City Planner, at (559) 637-4200 ext. 222 for more information.

22. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the street or placed on the ground.

23. All lighting shall be hooded and located so as to deflect light away from adjoining properties.

24. All open and unlandscaped portions of the lot shall be maintained in good condition, free from weeds, dust, trash, and debris.

25. Signage advertising the proposed uses is not approved for installation as part of this permit. Signs shall be reviewed and approved pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code Title 10, Chapter 14, Signs and Outdoor Advertising. Please contact Ellen Moore, Senior Planner, at (559) 637-4200 ext. 222 for more information.

26. Future tenants shall obtain a City of Reedley business license prior to commencement of business. Thereafter the applicant is required to keep the business license current and be in good standing with the City of Reedley.

27. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Application No. 6408 was deemed complete on March 8, 2022. Upon conditional approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408, approval shall be granted subject to only those ordinances, policies, and standards in effect on that date.

28. The applicant shall comply with the conditions, policies and standards set forth in the City of Reedley Municipal Code (RMC), Title 11 , "Subdivision Regulations," and City of Reedley, Standard Specifications, and any amendments thereto.

29. It is the intention of the applicant to file multiple final subdivision maps on this tentative map. If the applicant proposes to file multiple final subdivision maps, thus phasing the development of this subdivision , additional conditions may be imposed to provide a complete and workable system of City and public utilities as well as development of streets to provide traffic circulation and access for emergency and service equipment as various phases of the project are developed. The initial phasing proposal and each subsequent proposal thereafter shall be submitted for review and approval and attachment of conditions in addition to the conditions contained herein. At a minimum, phasing of the subdivision will require two points of access for emergency vehicles and the looping of Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

water lines to tie back to existing or extended services to provide a complete water service loop with no dead-ends.

30. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) for Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15. See Attachment

3. Building Division
31 . A complete plan set submittal shall be required to review for compliance with CA T24 Code of Regulations.

32. All on-site construction shall comply with all applicable codes and standards as adopted by the City of Reedley, including , but not limited to , fire and building codes. All phases of construction must be inspected and passed by the City Building Official, and the structure shall not be occupied until a "Certificate of Occupancy" has been issued by the Building Official and the Community Development Director and City Engineer have certified that site conditions have been complied with .

33. Construction area shall be securely fenced to prevent pedestrian travel and separate the area of construction from the public way.

34. County of Fresno Health Department Approval shall be obtained prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for a food facility .

35. Construction hours shall occur in accordance with the Construction Work Hours Handout. See Attachment 4.

Engineering Department:

Mapping

36. All subdivision and block corners, lot corners and street centerlines shall be monumented as per Subdivision Map Act and City of Reedley Standard Plan ST-41 & 42 .

37. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6408 must be recorded with the County of Fresno prior to the issuance of a building permit.

38. An estimated deposit for final parcel map checking in the amount of $1 ,000 shall be required with the submittal of the final parcel map to the City of Reedley. The total payment for final parcel map checking and all pertinent fees in accordance with City resolutions, ordinances and policies must be paid in full prior to the final parcel map being taken before the City Council for approval.

General Conditions
39 . All public improvements shall comply with the Reedley Municipal Code , the Standard Plans and Specifications of the City of Reedley and any addendums thereto. Public improvement plans shall be prepared by the Developer's engineer, for review and approval by the City Engineer.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

40. The Developer's contractor shall apply for an encroachment permit in accordance with City policies and shall furnish all necessary liability insurance as recommended by the City's insurance administrator. The city of Reedley shall be named as additional insured.

Prior to issuing the encroachment permit, the developer/contractor shall deposit with the City security to ensure faithful performance of the work in accordance with Title 7, Chapter 5, of the Reedley Municipal Code.
41 . The Developer shall abandon (removal of a portion of the casing and proper capping as per City Standard Plan W-11) any existing water wells within the boundary of the development according to standards and regulations as specified in Section 4-4-1 through 4-4-15 of the Reedley Municipal Code and Section 14.081160 of the Fresno County Code.

The Public Works Department must verify either the nonexistence of such wells or the appropriate abandonment of an existing well prior to the issuance of building permits.

Abandonment of an onsite well shall not be required until construction activities within the phase that the well exists are set to commence. If construction activities in previous phases impact the operations of the well, all such activities shall still be required within the developing phase.

If required to abandon an onsite well, a demolition permit shall be obtained from the Building Official prior to the removal of any existing structures. All septic tanks, dry wells or seepage pits shall be pumped and filled. Inspection shall be made by the City Building Official prior to covering . Relative compaction of ninety percent (90%) is required for fill areas outside of existing or proposed City rights-of-way. All areas within existing and/or proposed City rights-of-way, relative compaction of ninety-five percent (95%) is required.

Water supply wells shall be destroyed by a State Licensed C-57 Contractor in accordance with the requirements herein. A permit must be obtained from the Building Division before destroying any well . These above requirements shall be noted on the subdivision construction improvement plans.

42. The Developer shall remove any and all underground storage tank(s) existing on the property in accordance with the requirements of the County of Fresno Health Department and other applicable agencies. The Building Official must verify either the nonexistence of such tanks or the appropriate abandonment and/or removal, and provided with the copies of the Health Department certification prior to the issuance of building permits.

43. All buildings and structures shall be located outside of existing or proposed easements.

44. Developer's engineer shall establish his vertical control for this project to City (NAV88) Datum. Vertical control for this project shall be from City of Reedley Bench Mark No. 27B01 , Fresno County Brass Cap Monument (FCBCM) in concrete headway westerly side of I Street at the intersection of Manning Avenue and I Street= 351 .37. For the basis of bearings see Fresno County Record of Survey Book 57, pgs. 41-47. All control points shall be approved by the City's contract City Surveyor, DJ Johnson Land Surveying (559) 275- 4900.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

45. The Developer shall file a preliminary soil analysis and report, as required by Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code, with the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall have the authority to require Developer to take such corrective action or make such improvements as the City Engineer may determine necessary to prevent structural defects.

The soil classification report must be submitted to the Building Official for approval for the building pads prior to the issuance of a building permit(s). Such report shall address soil bearing capacity, effects of moisture variation on soil bearing capacity, compressibility and expansiveness. No grading shall commence until a soil engineering report is submitted and approved by the City and a grading permit is obtained from the City of Reedley Building Official. All grades and property stakes (corners) shall be in place prior to obtaining building permits.

46. The number and locations of proposed commercial driveway approaches within this development, including entrance and exit, shall be approved by the City Engineer. All proposed concrete driveway approaches shall conform to the standard commercial type approach , City of Reedley Standard Plan ST-21 or ST-22, and shall be ADA compliant.

Pedestrian easements shall be required at driveway locations that extend the sidewalk outside of dedicated rights of way.

47. Developer shall incorporate dust and erosion control measures into the construction phase of the project. The City Engineer shall review and approve said measures prior to the issuance of building permits. Developer's contractor shall take all reasonable precautions to prevent silt and other sedimentation from entering the City of Reedley's storm drainage and sewer systems. Such precautions should generally conform to "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" prepared by California Storm water Quality Association (CASQA). Such precautions shall be noted or shown on the off-site and onsite construction improvements plans and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

The developer shall make all reasonable efforts to incorporate post-construction storm water control measures into the final design of the project.

48. Consistent with the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act, Developer shall file a Notice of Intent to comply with the terms of the general discharge of storm water associated with construction activity (SWRCB Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ NPDES No.

CAS000002) with the disturbance of more than one acre by this project. Developer shall also have a qualified professional prepare a site-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for this project and submit to the City Engineer, along with the Notice of Intent, for review of compliance before any construction begins. A copy of the SWPPP shall be made available at the construction site at all times.

49. If applicable, the Developer shall also comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Order No. 5-00-175 construction activity requirements for all water discharges into the City's storm drain collection system, resulting from , but not limited to, pressure testing, leakage testing and disinfecting .

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21, 2022

50. The cost of facilities , based on prevailing wages per California requirements , within the street rights-of-way and/or City easements shall be submitted to the City Engineer for calculation of fees predicated on the cost of all public improvements.

51. An improvement plan check fee of $650.00 shall be submitted to the City Engineer with the first submittal of improvement plans. Improvement plans will not be reviewed until the plan check fee is submitted to and processed by the City.

52. The inspection fee for the construction of public improvements for streets, water, sewer, storm drain and similar public improvement requirements shall be paid with the issuance of a building permit. Inspection charge shall be 4.5% of the first $10,000 plus 3% of the amount over $10,000 of the approved engineer's cost estimate. The Developer's contractor shall apply for an Encroachment Permit with the City of Reedley for all work within the right-of-way and easements. No work within the City right of way will begin until the inspection fees are received/processed and the City Engineer approves the encroachment permit.

53. With the final submittal of construction improvement plans for this project, the Developer's engineer shall deliver the following to the City Engineer:

Three (3) bond sets of the project civil improvement construction plans, and shall include a digital copy on CD of the complete project plans, to include civil improvement construction and grading & drainage plans which shall include public utilities improvement plans if applicable.

54. All Development Impact Fees (DIF) shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with Reedley City Council No. Resolution No 2015-022, adopted March 24, 2015.

55. Any and all work performed in the City of Reedley Rights of Way shall be warranted for a period of 12 months from the date of installation.

56. A landscaping plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City with the first submittal of improvements for review and approval by the City Engineer. The landscaping shall be consistent with the landscaping on Manning Avenue fronting the property.

57. The property owner shall provide written consent to the City of Reedley for preparation of annexing these properties (APNs: 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) into the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District (LLMD) No. 1 to provide for maintenance of the median island landscaping and street lights along North Kings Drive and Kingswood Parkway. The District shall also include the existing landscape median island along Manning Avenue and the planter strip landscaping and street lights along the north side of Manning Avenue. The assessment shall be a proportionate share of the City Engineer's estimated cost for the District. City staff will prepare the LLMD Petition and Written Consent Waiver for review and signature by the property owner. A Landscape and Lighting formation fee in accordance with the City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule shall be paid with the signed LLMD No. 1, Petition and Written Consent Waiver.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

58. 59.

Streets

60. 61 .

62. 63.

64. 65.

The Developer's engineer shall provide a certified statement stating that all grades shown on the approved construction improvement plans have been constructed to grade. Any discrepancies in grade shall be noted and corrections made on "AS BUil T" plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. In addition, the Developer's engineer shall deliver a digital file (in Civil 30 2017 format) of the project's civil plans to the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Notice of Completion and/or Certificate of Occupancy to the Developer.

All of the conditions of approval must be complied with prior to the final inspection and/or the issuance of a "Certificate of Occupancy" by the Building Official.

All street structural sections shall be constructed, at a minimum, per City Standard detail ST-1 . The applicant shall submit street structural section pavement calculations with the first submittal of improvement plans. Structural sections shall include r-value tests taken from soils where streets are to be placed. A map showing the location of the borings and results of the r-values shall be included with the calculations.

Construction within street rights-of-way shall be done with proper signing for construction and maintenance work zones in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, most recent edition , and Work Area Traffic Control Handbook requirements. All work shall be in conformance with OSHA and other safety hazard prevention requirements.

All paving, repaving , and patching shall be done per the Standard Plans and Specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any City roadway travel way surface disturbed by construction activities shall be restored to provide a safe travel-way. A fog or slurry seal shall be required to provide continuity for re-paved areas with original street crosssection. All proposed trench patches within City streets shall be patched as per City Standard Plan ST-46, Section "A" Detail.

All streets within the limits of the development shall be fully constructed to current City & ADA standards including sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway approaches, permanent asphalt concrete paving , and street name, advisory and regulatory signs and street lights as directed by the City Engineer. Existing broken or not to grade (ADA non-compliant) sidewalk, curb, gutters and driveway approaches within the limits of this project shall be removed by the developer and reconstructed to City Standards. The travel-way surface shall be restored to provide a safe travel-way within the City street area.

North Kings Drive shall be constructed within the limits of the project per Standard Drawing ST-2 Collector with a median island. Subdivider shall dedicate 84-foot width of street right of way to the City of Reedley for North Kings Drive extension along the easterly limits of the project site.

Kingswood Parkway shall be constructed along the southerly limits of the project site per Standard Drawing ST-2 Collector with a median island. Subdivider shall dedicate 84-foot Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

width of street right of way to the City of Reedley for Kingswood Parkway extension along the southerly limits of the project site

66. Existing traffic signal at the intersection of Manning Avenue and North Kings Drive shall be modified as required to include traffic loops and street name signage per City of Reedley and Caltrans standards and specifications.

General Utilities

67. All Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) transformers shall be installed in accordance with the Reedley Municipal Code. Also, the Developer shall coordinate with PG&E to ensure that all utility boxes and other facilities are installed in accordance with City policies and standards.

68. As required per the Reedley Municipal Code Section 11-5-11 (G) any existing overhead utility poles within the limits of the property along North Kings Drive shall be installed underground.

69. Public utility plans and common trench utility plans for gas, electric, telephone and cable TV shall be prepared by the Developer's public utility engineer and submitted with the subdivision improvement plans for review and comment by the City Engineer. All public utilities shall be installed at back of sidewalk.

70. The Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, for his review and approval, a detailed street lighting plan prepared by a qualified electrical engineer. The plan shall show the street light locations, wattage, and mast arm length at a minimum . Street lights within the limits of the project site shall be LED type luminaires installed per City of Reedley Standard Plans ST-65 to 70 and in accordance with the recommendations of the utility companies and as approved by the Public Works Director to qualify for PG&E LS-2B rate schedule.

All streetlights shall be served by underground service. The Developer shall install all proposed streetlights. All streetlights within the right of way shall be City owned and maintained.
71 . Ingress/egress rights shall be provided to the City for its employees and equipment to enter upon the property for the purpose of inspections related to water, sewer system maintenance and refuse collection as applicable.
72 . Existing utilities to be upsized shall be removed complete in place unless approved by the City Engineer.

Water

73. Water distribution facilities and services shall be installed in accordance with the Standard Plans and Specifications of the City of Reedley.

74. On site water system shall be sized and designed so as to meet development demands as approved by the City of Reedley Fire Chief and City Engineer.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

75. In accordance with City ordinances and resolutions, the Developer shall install water service assemblies with water meter, box and reduced pressure backflow preventer within the City right-of-way per City Standard Plan W-4 or W-5, W-6, and W-15 and Specifications of the City of Reedley and any amendments thereto as directed by the City Engineer. Water service(s) shall be installed at the time of issuance of building permit(s).

The size and location of proposed water service(s) shall be noted on the construction improvement plans.

76. All connections to the existing City of Reedley water system must be made in the presence of a City employee authorized by the Public Works Department to inspect water connections. All connections must be cleaned and disinfected to the satisfaction of the City of Reedley. In the event a City employee is not present to witness the connection , all connection operations must be terminated and the contractor or developer will be required to show proof that the proper cleaning and disinfection procedures were taken to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Otherwise, remedial action such as flushing , cleaning of lines by polyurethane pigs, or other actions may be required by the City Engineer.

77. Connections: The service(s) and connections for this development shall be:
a. Upsize the 12-inch and 8-inch line in Manning Avenue to a 16-inch line and connect.
b. Extend 8-inch line in North Kings Drive from the intersection of Manning Avenue/I Street to the southerly limits of the proposed project. *Some of these conditions are required per the 2014 Integrated Master Plan and may be eligible for credits

78. Backflow preventers shall be tested and certified prior to the utilization of water. The owner shall have the proposed backflow preventer tested (repaired if required) by a certified backflow plumber on a yearly basis at their expense and the results submitted to City of Reedley Public Works Department.

79. Fire hydrants shall be installed at 300 feet maximum spacing and in accordance with the requirements of the City Fire Chief, City Engineer, and City of Reedley Standard Specifications and Standard Plan W-1 . All proposed fire hydrant locations shall be shown and noted on the construction improvement plans. A Fire Hydrant per City Standard W-1 shall be installed at the southerly terminus of 8-inch water line in North Kings Drive

80. Upon building permit issuance, the necessary water meter(s) for the project shall be purchased and ordered from the City of Reedley. Larger sized water meters may require an extended lead time. The water meter(s) and anti-siphon device must be installed on each service line prior to utilization of water for any reason from the water service lines.

An anti-siphon device is not necessary where a backflow preventer is required .

81. The Developer's contractor must apply for an Encroachment Permit Application and hydrant meter from the Public Works Department prior to any usage of water. Water trucks or water wagons must have appropriate air gap or Reduced Pressure Backflow prevention devices.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

Sewer

82. Sanitary sewer facilities and services shall be installed in accordance with the Standard Plans and Specifications of the City of Reedley. The location of proposed sewer service shall be noted on the construction improvement plans.

83. The service(s) for this development shall upsize the 10-inch, 12-inch and 15-inch lines running through the parcels to an 18-inch line and connect. Depending on the size of the sewer service lateral a connection to said 18-inch sewer line may require to be made by manhole.

84. Any private sewer facilities located within the subject property(s) shall be removed.

Grading & Drainage

85. The Developer's engineer shall provide a certified statement stating that all grades shown on the approved construction improvement plans have been constructed to grade. Any discrepancies in grade shall be noted and corrections made on "AS BUil T" plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. In addition, the Developer's engineer shall deliver a digital file (in AutoCAD R2014 format) of the projects civil plans to the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Notice of Completion and/or Certificate of Occupancy to the Developer.

86. The Developer shall incorporate dust and erosion control measures into the construction phase of the project according to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District requirements. The City Engineer shall review and approve said measures prior to the issuance of a grading and drainage permit by the City's Building Official. Failure of the Developer to appropriately incorporate adequate erosion and dust control measures shall constitute a material breach of these Conditions of Approval including the Improvement Agreement for this project and may result in administrative or legal actions taken by local, state or federal government agencies.

87. Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for his review and approval a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer employed by the Developer for site drainage grades in accordance with applicable standards. Drainage from this development shall be in accordance with the City's Master Storm Drainage Plan for this area. The storm drainage collection system shall be designed, sized and constructed on the basis of the Rational Method or similar method approved by the City Engineer.

88. All on-site surface drainage shall be designed to be collected on-site. No on-site surface drainage shall be allowed to drain over sidewalk, driveways or onto adjacent property.

Developer shall install storm drainage inlets per City of Reedley Standard Plans and specifications. Project on-site and off-site drainage from this development shall be directed towards said on-site collection point.

89. The parking area, aisles and access drives shall be paved with concrete or asphaltconcrete so as to provide a durable, dustless surface and shall be so graded and drained as to convey surface water into an appropriate collection and disposal system , with the Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21, 2022

design and specifications of such work subject to the approval of the City Engineer consistent with the purpose and intent of the City Code.

Public Works Department:

90. Trash enclosure locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department or their designee. Three (3) bin trash enclosures shall be required in order to comply with State of California solid waste and recycling laws. 91 . Per city Ordinance 4-1-12: TEMPORARY SERVICES "Temporary service providers that possessed a valid City of Reedley business license when the City's franchise agreement was executed (April 27, 2021) shall have continuation rights to provide temporary roll-off services for a period of five (5) years from the date of the franchise agreement execution." Applicant shall utilize one of the providers that currently have a valid City of Reedley Business License for temporary roll off services. The applicant's three (3) options are as follows: Mid Valley Disposal, Miramonte's Sanitation , and Pena's Disposal Inc.

Fire Department:

92. Submittal of project plans shall be in conformance with the City's Emergency Operations Plan and California Fire Code Standards.

93. Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter from the City of Reedley Fire Department dated March 27, 2020. See Attachment 5.

OUTSIDE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS

94. 95.

96. 97.

Kings Canyon Unified School District (KCUSD): Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter provided by the Kings Canyon Unified School District dated May 1, 2020. Developer shall provide to the City written certification of payment of Kings Canyon Unified School District facilities fees prior to the issuance of any building permit. New development on the subject property will be subject to the fee in place at the time school facilities are paid. See Attachment 6.

Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo): Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter provided by the Local Agency Formation Commission dated April 3, 2020. See Attachment 7.

County of Fresno Department of Public Works and Planning: Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter provided by the County of Fresno Department of Public Works and Planning dated April 30, 2020. See Attachment 8.

County of Fresno Department of Public Health: Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter provided by the Fresno County Department of Public Health dated March 23, 2020. See Attachment 9.

Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit Application No. 2022-05
July 21 , 2022

98. County of Fresno Regional Transportation Mitigation Fees (RTMF): Acknowledgment of RTMF fees must be signed prior to issuance of building permits. Regional traffic impact fees must be paid (if required) prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. See Attachment 10.

99. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCO): Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter provided by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District dated July 16, 2020. See Attachment 11 . 100. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E): Development shall take place in accordance with the correspondence provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company dated April 15, 2020 and March 20, 2020. See Attachment 12.
101 . If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner Division shall be immediately contacted at (559) 600-3400. If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin , the Native American Heritage Commission (phone number (916) 653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (phone number (805) 644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists.

If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at the University of California , Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist; if the paleontologist determines the material to be significant, a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures.

Enclosures: Exhibit A, dated May 22, 2022 and Exhibits B, C & D, dated March 8, 2022 Attachment 1 - Development Impact Fee Estimate
Attachment 2 - CFO Information: Sample Petition to Initiate Annexation and City Council Resolution No. 2022-038
Attachment 3 - Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for EA No. 2020-15 Attachment 4 - Construction Hours Handout
Attachment 5 - Fire Department Memorandum dated March 27, 2020 Attachment 6 - Kings Canyon Unified School District Comment Letter dated May 1, 2020
Attachment 7 - Local Agency Formation Commission Comment Letter dated April 3, 2020
Attachment 8 - County of Fresno Department of Public Works and Planning Comment Letter dated April 30, 2020
Attachment 9 - County of Fresno Department of Public Health Comment Letter dated March 23, 2020
Attachment 10 - RTMF Fee Acknowledgment and Fee Information Attachment 11 - San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Comment Letter dated July 16, 2020
Attachment 12 - PG&E Correspondence dated April 15, 2020 and March 20, 2020 ~~:JI
•;c.c.t:r>iiCYl'\"'1VO,, CU- j
... ~ .......... ,~ ~ ..... ,,,. -~-,-
I
I
I
~1
~i
------l ~.'
VICINITY MAP ~ !!5~-~
ENLARGED PROPOSED SI~ PLAN -SCHEME 7! Ii'"'""":·~· 1
Li::GAL DE SCRIPi lON
~• _,_ u,, •Jor ~cn.o,,t. ~ >o twe...,.~~0 -11. ,_,.. '°""""' ' - ~llt or ,v,n.m~-.s~ 1'01>< ~01'•0-.C.. .. ___ .. ~ ... QC-t,t,f'l- 0# ~-fW(Jt roc:t:l"-c ~~• -,,o,, ar s.c,..,,.c,oa:oc:orotwlco,,nv or ncs,,oor,-aao ""°"°'° 'l.O..IJT " · ,,n •--. ""Ill 1~ or o,rooc, •1u:1:1110s.. OCSCJll(tl AS •~ --••twl-0,""'V'l(l:l"OO O, "<~-T ao-. Ql' twl~-
~ :-::c1,•':-'~. ~-:o·~~~oo,ro:~=-\!" u.
:,~~:;rf, noa: (l)(I) ~T ~/;,. ~ . , ·~~~-rut• n<l<l (•) . .,. _... r(Nf~u:~~ui: ~1:.-~~~ f><o<( (3)~ ; ~ .:::001 :;>"_.f,"':'Y. ~~--:7:r_. oc.oc s..G~PllY -<7 t>< IOCI <OCII' - ,,U,0 ~ ~ ~t l'Olff'OI OI 'IMO t,,H) 0UOm fO n,( eo.-,TYO, t"IION). IJl'Cl.lO ..COCJIIO(O ...olSf ,,. ,,n., 11001<-.""'" '"or o,rQol "l00'ICIS. lll50llllO -s rouows. · - •• ,_, OI onut!ltnOIIOI' I'< ~-Y UC o,nc: 90<1 a, ..-,a, nc: __,.....,..ornc5CIJ'IIOIONOl"C~ IITW •I.M ,,,... IC)lll'N l1 ll" !ASfnll:,r,ll ~ ... or~-:C~~:~~~::~~~.~.
;-:.•.~ , .... _«· .. _ .:;;,~"]f":i;?1r.:u~;g__::.-;:

VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 64OB
OTANI SUBDIVISION BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 43 OF REED COLONY, RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 39 , F . C . R . IN THE CITY OF REEDLEY, COUNTY O F

FRESNO , STATE OF C A LIFORNIA
' · ncJl[-Oll(,O~Q.l.lOll'l,--011--T""5SUDOIIO< l . rtalt-0111SUC JDIOI --- -C-a.J..!i0,," 1 n<SJDiGCNCCIIOIIIIIO,CU, IO ~CCDll'rtll5a.LIUI-HQUIII.I-UJNl 011 --.-aer-ac-,:;w.., r.oc;IU.CM;l5. • IWDl[ l5 Ul!llln- t• onuua:KYICO<n«STIIOCIIKJolQIO(OIIRICPCIIIU 1 rtaltC51.\1U911.DISTIC~ I QIOOOJO - -.S~IOet: 'OOl.ll Ill T>Olt-,0~,0.-:S, OO MS_.,. ll)l[ lll,O(D -., 1'4:"""" '7,..,. 'noi: 11 -~SH:111KJ .... ,a:A(1,0(l),S- f7 1'-!,Pll;).,{O 1-~4;"5:IIJMCD lO lll"'OCDl lr ,x.,t.
t. !DOl - .:UIDNCl:5Nlll. lO l!l:PIIOGD lr 3< 0TYO •O. -IKJDSl~EM.:D « l'O l!l:IIIIDOl> ll' n< OTY fYICtO.CI', 11, Qia-c~al!l: IO l[IIIO,IUD9'f!ICI(. ,z. ~ - ...._, ~-ll) -~lr trnO //J.¥ 01tWCAsi 11 -~-...onl ..., IWl:""lA fY COIC'lll,ltTOl !il-W.l. 11'. ~ ~ IUCI Ill 4"UIOO l co.lJl•O -,,u.-~"'"< nat'l <>I~ : : t>C ~ ~"'OI IO ~ - •---=~-::~:,:;;:-;

SCALEIN FTET
,- .. 200·
l'llnO:'T~ ,co;,aCJl) "'Cllfn l O<J~- ~
~~.r,(.

CQSn,Ol,lt<O U51t: _,,,_
1"'Csntl5UlC.Al'( 0 .. ~ r\000lCM: Y
..0 ".a("~ ""'~-
06Clltc:26P4 £JTCCT""l: 0,, 01/l t / l'OOI,
VTSM 6408
3/8/2022
w
u
>
Ill
w
LI
i::

LL
D
z
~
f0
,/z
I
j
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I

J I / I
I
I
I
PARCELB (R3)
<DITVIUC/ KC1'00ll o,(
''"""'
Ol/alt ,,,...,... ~ crrv,rti ,011 IXDC,t>o, •011 -.-c la[ --
WI U} - · > l
.
< Ill r
w 6 (J iii
r;: > i.. a 0 ~ - . z w <( ~
f- ~
D ~
'"" 11:"• <tt;crc,.
'\:::i,-a<,..,c~1;.•"" N

Community Development Department
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
Development Impact Fees Estimate: Commercial
Project Description:
56 ,773 SF Commercial Master Plan with 10 Commercial
Buildings
Address : 1605 Upper Bridge Road APN :
368-350-17
368-350-31
368-350-32
368-350-33
Development Impact Fee Breakdown·
Transportation Facilities $2.220 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $126,036.060 Law Enforcement Facilities $0.050 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $2,838.650 Fire Facilities $0.440 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $24,980.120 General Government Facilities $0.040 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $2,270.920 Storm Drain Facilities $1 .922 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $109,117.706 Wastewater Facilities $1.104 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $62,677.392 Water Facilities $0.869 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $49,335.737 Park and Recreational Facilities $0.569 per sf X 56,773 sq ft = $32,303.837 Total Development Impact Fees: $7.214 per sf x 56,773 sq ft = $409,560.42 Notes:

1. Development Impact Fees are paid at the time of building permit issuance based on the square footage within the scope of the building permit application.

2. The estimated fees are based upon information provided by the applicant and calculated using the City of Reedley, Master Fee Schedule in place at the time of the estimate request.

3. All fees will be re-calculated using the current City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule when construction documents are submitted for permitting.

4. The Master Fee Schedule is reviewed annually by the City Council and subject to change.

5. This estimate is only for the City of Reedley Development Impact Fees and does not include Building Permit Fees or any fees for other City Departments or other jurisdictions (Kings Canyon Unified School District, County Impact Fees, RTMF Joint Powers Agency, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, etc.)
Date Prepared:

July 14, 2022

PETITION AND WRITTEN CONSENT
(INCLUDING WAIVER)

REQUESTING COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER
THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982

TO ANNEX CERTAIN TERRITORY TO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
(PUBLIC FACILITIES)
To the Council of the City of Reedley
c/o the City Clerk of the City of Reedley
Reedley City Hall
1 717 Ninth Street
Reedley, California 93654
Re: Request to Commence with Proceedings for
Assessor's Parcel Nos. 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32 & 368-350-33 (Site Plan Review No. 2020-01)
Members of the City Council:

The Council on November 8, 2005 finalized the formation of the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 . This Special Tax is for the sole purpose of funding increasing demands on essential and timely Police, Fire and Park Maintenance services as a direct result of new development within the City. Because of this special tax, Reedley continues to be one of the safest communities in Fresno County. Without this funding source, which is based on direct causes and effects of new development, the level of public safety services will be impacted, response times to emergency situations will be affected and the public 's general health will be affected by lack of park maintenance.

The levy of said proposed special tax shall be subject to approval of the qualified electors of the District at a special election. In no event shall the special taxes be levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

The undersigned is the duly owner or authorized representative of the owner of all the territory of real property initiating the commencement of proceedings regarding certain properties, as described on attached Exhibit A and shown by the map in Exhibit B-1 (the "Territory"). The owner, or authorized representative, hereby petitions and requests that you commence proceedings pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Chapter 2.5, commencing with Section 53311 , of Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the California Government Code) (the "Act") to annex and add all the territory in the Parcel to the real property included within the boundaries of the City's Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Facilities) ("CFD No. 2005-1 ).

The owner or authorized representative further petitions and requests that the Council proceed as quickly as possible with all proceedings necessary to accomplish such annexation and levy. In that -1-
regard, to the greatest extent allowed by law, the owner hereby expressly waives all notices, procedures and requirements otherwise required under the Act, including without limitation (i) the time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act, including but not limited to the requirement that the special election be held at least 90 but not more than 180 days following the adoption of the resolution calling the election and any other requirement pertaining to the conduct of the election; (ii) the requirement contained in Section 53327 of the Act for preparation and delivery to voters of an impartial analysis, arguments and rebuttals relating to the proposition submitted at the election; and (iii) any notice requirements relating to the special election, whether contained in the California Government Code, the California Elections Code, the California Streets & Highways Code or elsewhere, and expressly consents to the commencement of proceedings without completion of or compliance with such notices, procedures or requirements. The owner or authorized representative further agrees that the election may be conducted by mailed or personally-delivered ballot, to be returned as promptly as practicable to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Reedley, and that the results of the elections be canvassed and reported to you as promptly as practicable thereafter.

In consideration for the Council conducting the annexation and levy proceedings requested herein, the owner will immediately execute and deliver to the City any documents the City deems necessary to accomplish the annexation and levy proceedings and to further evidence the consent and waivers in this Petition, including but not limited to ballots and receipts for notice.

Also in consideration for the Council conducting such annexation and levy proceedings, the owner will remain the sole owner of all real property in the Parcel and will not transfer title to any such real property to any other person or entity until completion of the proceedings by the City.

Respectfully submitted by:

PROPERTY OWNER(S):

APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , & 368-350-32
Otani Properties, A California Limited Partnership
By:---------------- Hideki Otani, General Partner
APN 368-350-33
Hideki Otani and Edward M Otani
By:----------- ----- Hideki Otani
By:---------------- Edward M. Otani
-2-
Date
Date -------------
Date
ORDER NO.: 1411015465

EXHIBIT A
The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Fresno, State of California, and is described as follows:

PARCEL ONE:

That portion of Lot 43 of Reed Colony, according to the Map thereof recorded in Book 4 Page 39 of Plats, Fresno County Records, described as follows:

Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southwesterly line of the right of way of the Porterville Branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad with a line drawn North 00° 28' East from a point, distance of 2128.2 feet West and 100 feet North from the Southeast corner of said Lot 43, said point of intersection being the Northwest corner of land conveyed to Les A.

Hollingsworth and Evelyn Hollingsworth, his wife, by Deed dated October 13, 1928, and recorded October 17, 1928, in Book 931 Page 157 of Official Records of said County; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said railroad right of way, 244 feet; thence South 22° 39' West, 137.94 feet to the true point of beginning; thence, continuing South 22° 39' West, 82.06 feet to a point; thence at a right angle Northwesterly 152 feet to the West line of the portion of said Lot 43 conveyed to said Les A. Hollingsworth and wife by Deed herein referred to; thence, North 00° 28' East along said West line, 78.72 feet to a point on the Southwesterly right of way line of Manning Avenue; thence South 70° 24' 40 11 East, 184 feet to the true point of beg inning.

APN: 368-350-33
PARCEL TWO:

That portion Lot 43 of Reed Colony, according to the Map thereof recorded November 8, 1889 in Volume 4, Page 39 of Plats, described as follows:

Beginning at a point of intersection of East Bank of Kings River, as shown on said Map, with a line drawn parallel with and distant 100 feet Northerly from the South line of said Lot 43 and running thence in a Easterly direction along said line drawn as aforesaid 8881'e'e(n'f'[tn·nfr1g ( q 5~). 7 7') ( thence at right angles and in a Northerly direction 1648 feet, more or less, to a point on the Southerly line of the railroad right of way shown on said Map; thence in a Northerly and in a Westerly direction along said Southerly line of said railroad right of way to a point of intersection of said Southerly line of said railroad right of way with the Easterly line of the county road extending from the East end of Kings River Bridge described in the Deed recorded in Book 61, Page 162 of Deeds, running thence in a Southerly and in a Westerly direction along the said Easterly line of said county road to a point of intersection of said line of said county road and the East Bank of Kings River, and running thence in a Southerly and Westerly direction along said East Bank of said Kings River to the point of beginning.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of said land deeded to the County of Fresno by Deed recorded August 17, 1972 in Book 6058, Page 785 of Official Records, described as follows:

Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southwesterly boundary of the Southern Pacific Railroads 100 foot right of way with a line bearing North 00° 28' 00 11 East, a distance of 1648 feet from a point being 2128.2 feet West and 100 feet North from the Southeast corner of said Lot 43; thence South 67° 21' 00" East, along said Southwesterly boundary of 100 foot right of way, a distance of 244 feet to the true point of beginning; thence (1) South 22° 39' 00" West, a distance of 137 .94 feet thence (2) South 70° 24' 40 11 East, a distance of 122.37 feet; thence (3) South 67° 23' 24" East, a distance of 395.00 feet; thence (4) South 64° 58' 34" East, to the center line of Alta Irrigation District Ditch; thence (5) Northwesterly along said center line of ditch, to the point of intersection with the Southwesterly boundary of said 100 foot right of way; thence (6) Northwesterly, along said Southwesterly boundary of the 100 foot right of way, to the true point of beginning.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of said land deeded to the County of Fresno, by Deed recorded August 17, 1972 in Book 6058, Page 785 of Official Records, described as follows:

Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southwesterly boundary of the Southern Pacific Railroad's 100 foot right of way with a line bearing North 00° 28' 00" East, a distance of 1648 feet from a point being 2128.2 feet West and 100 feet North from the Southeast corner of said Lot 43; thence South (1) South 00° 28' 00" East, a distance of 159.58 feet; thence (2) North 70° 24' 40" West, a distance of 54.13 feet; thence (3) North 67° 23' 24" West, to the point of intersection with the Easterly boundary of a 60 foot road right of way, as deeded to the County of Fresno, recorded in Book 231, Page 316 of Deeds, Fresno County Records; thence (4) Northeasterly, along said Easterly boundary of the 60 foot right of way to the point of intersection with the said Southwesterly boundary of the railroad right of way; thence (5) South 67° 21' 00" East, along said railroad right of way, a distance of 91 feet to the point of beginning .

APN: 368-350-31
PARCEL THREE:

That portion of Lot 43 of Reed Colony, in the unincorporated area, County of Fresno, (A portion being in the City of Reedley), State of California, as per Map recorded November 8, 1889 in Book 4 Page 39 of Plats, Fresno County Records, described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the West side of public highway extending North and South through the center of Section 27, Township 15 South, Range 23 East, M.D.B.M., where said West line of said highway is intersected by the Southerly line of the right of way of the Porterville Branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad, extending and running thence South along the West line of said highway, 362 feet and 2 inches, more or less, to a point 100 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Lot 43 of Reed Colony; thence West at right angles with said highway and parallel with the South line of said Lot 43 a distance of 2128 feet and 2 inches; thence at rig ht angles North and parallel with said highway 1648 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the Southerly line of the right of way of said Porterville Branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad; thence Southeasterly along the South line of said right of way of said railroad to the place of beginning.

EXCEPTING that portion described as:

Beginning at a point of intersection of the Southwesterly line of the right of way of the Porterville Branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad with a line drawn North 0° 28' East from a point distant 2128.2 feet West and 100 feet North from the Southeast corner of said Lot 43, said point of intersection being the Northwest corner of land conveyed to Les A. Hollingsworth and Evelyn Hollingsworth, his wife, by Deed dated October 13, 1928 and recorded October 17, 1928 in Book 931 Page 157 of Official Records; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said railroad right of way 244 feet; thence at a right angle Southwesterly 220 feet; thence at a right angle Northwesterly 152 feet to the West line of portion of said Lot 43 conveyed to said Les A. Hollingsworth and wife by Deed hereinbefore referred to; thence North 0° 28' East along said West line 238.3 feet to the point of beginning.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof lying Easterly of the center line of the Alta Irrigation District Ditch, as said ditch was located on said property on March 7, 1955.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all the right, title and interest condemned by the City of Reedley, a municipal corporation, by Final Order of Condemnation dated October 21, 1943 and recorded October 21, 1943 in Book 2146 Page 326 of Official Records.

Together with the use of that certain 20 horsepower pump now situate on the parcel of land lying Easterly of the centerline of the Alta Irrigation District Ditch, as said ditch was located on said property on March 7, 1955, which said parcel of land is adjacent to the above described property on the East; also together with a right of way for the purpose of the use of said pump for irrigating the hereinabove described property.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of said land deeded to the County of Fresno, by Deed recorded August 17, 1972 in Book 6058, Page 785, Official Records, described as follows:

Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southwesterly boundary of the Southern Pacific Railroads 100 foot right of way with a line bearing North 00° 28' 00" East, a distance of 1648 feet from a point being 2128.2 feet West and 100 feet North from the Southeast corner of said Lot. 43; thence South 67° 21' 00" East, along said Southwesterly boundary of 100 foot right of way, a distance of 244 feet to the true point of beginning; thence (1) South 22° 39' 00 11 West, a distance of 137.94 feet; thence (2) South 70° 24' 40 11 East, a distance of 122.37 feet; thence (3) South 67° 23' 24" East, a distance of 395.00 feet; thence (4) South 64° 581 34 11 East, to the center line of Alta Irrigation District Ditch; thence (5) Northwesterly along said center line of ditch, to the point of intersection with the Southwesterly boundary of said 100 foot right of way; thence (6) Northwesterly, along said Southwesterly boundary of the 100 foot right of way, to the true point of beginning.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of said land deeded to the County of Fresno, by Deed recorded August 17, 1972 in Book 6058, Page 785, Official Records, described as follows:

Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southwesterly boundary of the Southern Pacific Railroads 100 foot rig ht of way with a line bearing North 00° 28' 00 11 East, a distance of 1648 feet from a point being 2128.2 feet West and 100 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Lot 43; thence, (1) South 00° 28' 00 11 East, a distance of 159.58 feet; thence (2) North 70° 24' 40 11 West, a distance of 54.13 feet; thence (3) North 67° 231 24 11 West, to the point of intersection with the Easterly boundary of a 60 foot road right of way, as Deeded to the County of Fresno, recorded in Book 231 Page 316 of Deeds, Fresno County Records, thence (4) Northeasterly, along said Easterly boundary of the 60 foot right of way to the point of intersection with the

said Southwesterly boundary of the railroad right of way; thence (5) South 67° 21' 00" East, along said railroad right of way, a distance of 91 feet, to the point of beginning.

APN: 368-350-17 and 368-350-32

' )
NORTH
SCALE: NTS
APN 368-350-31

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1733 NINTH STREET
REEDLEY, CA 93654
PHONE (559)637-4200
i-r•'
l!I L APN 368-350-33
• • •
: • • APN 368-350-32
' ..
• •• • •• • •••
• ••
• -•••
• ••
• -•---...--- •
• Ill
: APN 368-350-17
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

ANNEXED INTO CITY OF REEDLEY'S

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES)
EXHIBIT '8'-1
I .-'-
I
DIAGRAM OF APN 368-350- 17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32 &
SPR 2020-01 368-350-33
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005 - 1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) DA TE: OCTOBER 30, 2020 I DRWN BY: SR I ID - Z:\ Eng Dept\ Dept Files\ Community Facilities District 2005-1 \ SPR 2020-01 \ SPR 2020-01 Exhibit B-1 .dwg - October 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-038

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY DETERMINING SPECIAL TAX RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 FOR THE CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES)
WHEREAS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Council pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Law"), this Council on November 8, 2005, adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley Declaring Results of Special Election and Directing Recording of Notice of Special Tax Lien" finalizing the formation of the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the "District") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, California Government Code Section 53311 et seq. (the "Law"); WHEREAS, the City Clerk executed and caused to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Law.

WHEREAS, Maximum Special Tax Rates were established as follows :

Category I includes each Developed Parcel within the District for which a building permit has been issued prior to July 1 of the current Fiscal Year. Said Maximum Special Tax shall increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor which is the Annual All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area .

TABLE 1
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

CATEGORY I
Special Tax Per Dwelling Unit/ Acre

DEVELOPMENT TYPE SPECIAL MAXIMUM TAX RATE
Single Family Residential $ 1,130.7032
(per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family Residential $ 840.3875
(per dwelling unit)
Non-Residential $ 0.3056
(per gross building square foot)
Affordable Housing $ 565.3516
(per dwelling unit)
Infill Non-Residential $ 0.1528
(per building square foot)
Category 11 includes each Parcel within the District that Is not included in Category I.

The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied annually on Taxable Property in Category II beginning with the Fiscal Year starting July 1, 2022 ending June 30, 2023 is as set forth in Table 2 below per Net Developable Acre (said amount to be levied prorata for any portion of an acre). Said special tax shall increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor which is the Annual All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area.

TABLE 2
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

CATEGORY II
Special Tax Per Net Developable Acre
$ 916.7864 per acre
2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AS FOLLOWS:

1. The following Special Tax Rates shall be levied for the ensuing 2022-2023 fiscal year on all eligible properties in the District per the Rate and Method of Special Tax.

ADOPTED SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

CATEGORY I
Special Tax Per Dwelling Unit/ Acre

DEVELOPMENT TYPE SPECIAL TAX RATE
Single Family Residential $ 963.00
(per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family Residential $ 717.00
(per dwellinQ unit)
Non-Residential $ 0.26
(per gross building square foot)
Affordable Housing $ 486.00
(per dwellin~ unit)
Infill Non-Residential $ 0.13
(per building square foot)
ADOPTED SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

CATEGORY II
Special Tax Per Net Developable Acre
$ 782.00 per acre

2. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption .

This Resolution was duly passed , approved , and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley this 26th day of April 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Soleno, Betanco urt , Tuttle, Fast.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Beck .

ABSTAIN : None.

ATTEST: ~'0i__) Ruthie Greenwood , City Clerk
3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CEQA requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). This mitigation monitoring and reporting program is intended to track and ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during the project implementation phase. For each mitigation measure recommended specifications are made herein that identify the action required, the monitoring that must occur, and the agency or department responsible for oversight.

Enrivonmental Assessment No. 2020-15
City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments AG-1 Agricultural Mitigation Program
The project applicant shal l be subject to the
following DOC recommendations for such
programs which are required to be
implemented by the Reedley General Plan,
include the following regulations to ensure the
conversion of farmland would be mitigated to
the extent feasible:

Direct Acquisition (In-kind Acquisition)
The City Council may approve the
acquisition of any agricultural
conservation easement intended to
satisfy the requirements of the
implementation of the DOC FPP
Guidelines.
2 The location and characteristics of the
agricultural preservation land shall
comply w ith the provisions of these
guidelines.

The development interest shall pay
an administrative fee equal to cover
the costs of administering,
monitoring, and enforcing the
farm land conservation easement.

The fee amount shal l be determined
by the Land Trust and approved by
the City Council.

The Planning Commission shall review
each agricultural conservation
easement for consistency with these
guidelines prior to approval by the
City Council. The Commission shall
make a formal recommendation to
the City Council for consideration.

Requirements: The project applicant
shall follow DOC recommendation s to
ensure conversion of farmland would
be mitigated which include compliance
with DOC provisions and guidelines,
pay all necessa ry fees and in-lieu fees
determined by the Land Trust.

Prior to approval for
the conversion of
Farmland .

Prior to project
approval ensure
all approval
requirements
are met and
fees are paid.

City of
Reedley
Planning
Division;
DOC
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments In-Lieu Fees : The payment of an in-lieu fee shall
be su bject to the following provisions :

The in-lieu fee shall be determined
case-by-case in consultation with the
Land Trust and approved by the City
Council. In no case shall the in-lieu fee
be less than 35% of the average per
acre price for five (5) comparable land
sales in Fresno County.

The in-lieu fee shall include the costs
of managing the easement, including
the cost of administering, monitoring,
and enforcing the farmland
conservation easement, and a five
percent (5%) endowment of the cost
of the easement, and the payment of
the estimated transaction costs
associated with acquiring the
easement. The costs shall be
approved by the City Council based
on information relating to the costs
provided by the Land Trust.

The Planning Commission shal l review
the final in-lieu fee proposal for
consistency with thi s program prior to
approval by the City Council. The
Commission shall make a formal
recommendation to the City Council
for consideration.

The City Council shall approve the
final amount and other terms of the
in-lieu fee.

Projects that qualify to pay the in-lieu
fee shall be subject to a 2.5%
admini stration fee.

Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01 3
City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments AQ-1 San Joaquin Valley Fever
Prior to ground disturbance activities, the Requirements: The project proponent/ Prior to ground project proponent/operator shall develop a operator shall develop "Va lley Fever disturbances. "Valley Fever Training Handout" and schedule of Training Handout" handouts and sessions for education to be provided to all schedule educational sessions for construction personnel. All evidence of the construction personnel prior to ground training session(s) and handout(s) shall be kept disturbance activities on site for review by the County or Air District as
requested. Multiple training sessions may be
conducted if different work crews come to the
site for different stages of construction;
4 however, all construction personnel shall be
provided training prior to beginning work.

Training Session(s) shall include the following:
a) A sign-in sheet (to include the printed
employee names, signature, and date) for
all employees who attended the training
session.
b) Distribution of a written flier or brochure
that includes educational information
regarding :
the health effects of exposure to
Valley Fever,
recognition of symptoms and when to
seek treatment,
Methods that may help prevent
Valley Fever release,
Methods that may help prevent
Valley Fever exposure.
c) A demonstration to employees on how to
use personal protective equipment, such
as masks, to reduce exposure to spores.

Though use of masks is not mandatory
during work, they shall be readily
Prior to ground
disturbances
ensure that
project
proponent/
operator
develops and
schedules
"Valley Fever
Training
Handout" and
educational
sess ion for
construction
personnel.

City of
Reedley
Planning
Division
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigat1on Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments available and sha ll be provided to
employees as requested .

Biological Resources .

BI0-1 Worker Environmental Awareness
Program
Prior to initiation of construction activities
(including staging and mobi lization), all
personnel associated with project construction
shall attend WEAP training, conducted by a
qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing
special-status resources that may occur in the
construction area. The specifics of this program
shall include identification of special-status
species and habitats, a description of the
regulatory status and general ecological
characteristics of sensitive resources, and
review of the limits of construction and
mitigation measures required to reduce impacts
to biological resources with in the work area. A
fact sheet conveying this information shall also
be prepared for distribution to all contractors,
their employers, and other personnel involved
with construction. All employees shall sign a
form provided by the trainer indicating they
have attended the WEAP and understand t he
information presented to them.

BI0-2 Mitigation Measures for Burrowing Owl
A preconstruction cleara nce survey for
burrowing owls shall be conducted by a
qualified biologist no less than 14 days prior to
the start of construction activities in accordance
with the protocols adopted by the CDFW Staff
Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012). If
Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01
Requirements: All personnel Prior to initiation of
associated with project construction to construction
attend WEAP training conducted by a activities including qualified Biologist . The qualified staging and
biologist shall al so provide a fact sheet mobilization . with information for construction
personnel.

Requirements: Qualified biologist shall At least 14 days conduct a preconstruction survey for Prior to
burrowing owls . If observed, then construction
avoidance and minimization measures activities
shal l be implemented. If unavoidable
then the CDFW shall be consulted for
Prior initiation City of
of construction Reedley
activities the Planning
City of Reed ley Division;
Planning Qualified
Division shall Biologist
ensure that a
qualified
biologist
conducts a
WEAP training
for construction
personnel.

Ensure that all
construction
employees sign
a form provided
by the trainer
indicating they
attended the
WEAP training
and understand
the
information .

City of Reedley City of
shall ensure Reedley
that a qualified Planning
biologist Division;
conducts a
preconstruction
5 City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments 6 burrowing owls are observed on site or within passive eviction and if necessary, 500 feet of t he site, the following avoidance and relocation. minimization measures shall be implemented:

A no-disturbance buffer shall be
established around occupied
burrows. The buffer size may range
from 150 feet to 650 feet depending
on the time of year and the level of
construction activity (refer to CDFW
2012).

A qualified biologist shall monitor the
nest to ensure construction activities
wil l not adversely impact the nesting
birds and determine when the
burrow is no longer occupied.

If construction activities cannot avoid the active
burrowing owl nest, CDFW shall be consu lted
regarding passi ve eviction . If necessary,
burrowing owls may be relocated from burrows
after an exclusion plan is prepared and
approved by the CDFW
B10-3 M itigation Measures for San Joaquin Kit
Fox
A pre-construct ion clearance survey for Sa n
Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) shall be conducted no less
than 14 days and not more than 30 days prior to
the initiation of ground-disturbing activities. The
su rvey area shall include the entire study area
and all accessible undeveloped habitat within
200 feet. If potential dens are observed, they
must be avoided to the maxi mum extent
possible.

Th e following minimum nondisturbance buffers shall be established prior to construction
Requirements: Qualified biologist shall
conduct a preconstruction survey for
the Sa n Joaquin Kit Fox . If observed,
then avoidance and minimization
measures shall be implemented.

At least 14 days and
no more than 30
days prior to ground
di sturbing activities.
clea rance Qualified
survey for Biologist;
burrowing owls CDFW
and follows
appropriate
mitigation
measures for
survey results.

City of Reedley City of
shall ensure Reedley
that a qualified Planning
biologist Division;
conducts a Qualified
preconstruction Biologist;
clearance USFWS
survey for
burrowing owls
and follows
appropriate
mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments activities (consistent with USFWS
guidance [2011]):

Potential den : 50 feet
Atypical den: 50 feet
Known den: 100 feet
Natal/pupping den: at least 500 feet,
and USFWS must be contacted.

Buffer establishment shal l be
establ ished in accordance with
USFWS Standardized
Recommendations for Protection of
the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox
Prior to or Du ring Ground
Disturbance (USFWS 2011) under
"Exclusion Zones."
If known San Joaquin kit fox dens are
observed on the site, and cannot be
avoided, USFWS and CDFW must be
contacted rega rding incidental take
permits.

Construction activities shall adhere to the
avoidance and minimization measures outlined
in the USFSWS 2011 Standardized
Recommendations for Protection of t he
Endangered Sa n Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or
During Ground Disturbance, outlined below:

Project-related vehicles shall observe a 20-mph
speed limit in all study areas, except on county
roads and State and Federal highways; this is
particularly important at night when kit foxes
are most active. To the extent possible, nighttime construction shall be minimized. Off-road traffic outside of designated study areas shal l be
prohibited.

To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes
or other animals duri ng the construction phase
Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01
measures for
survey resu lts.

City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments of a project, all excavated, steep-wall ed holes or
trenches more than 2 feet deep shal l be covered
at t he close of each working day by plywood or
simi lar materials or provided with one or more
escape ramps constructed of earth fi ll or
wooden planks . Before such holes or trenches
are filled, they shal l be thoroughly inspected for
trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or
injured kit fox is discovered, the USFWS shall be
notified within t hree days of the discovery.

All food-related t rash items such as wrappers,
cans, bottles, and food scraps sha ll be disposed
of in closed conta iners and removed at least
once a week from a construction or project site.

Use of rodenticides and herbicides in study
areas shal l be restricted . This is necessary to
prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit
foxes and the depletion of prey populations on
which they depend. All uses of such compounds
shall observe label and other restrictions
mandated by t he U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, California Department of Food and
Agricult ure, and other State and Federal
legislation, as wel I as additional project-related
restrictions deemed necessary by the Service. If
rodent control must be conducted, zinc
phosphide shall be used because of proven
lower risk to kit fox.
8 B10-4 Mitigation Measures for Swainson's
Hawk
To avoid impacts to nesting Swainson's hawk, all
construction activities shall be limited to the
time period between August 30 and February 1.

If construction activities cannot be completed
within t his timefra me, a protocol-level survey
should be conducted in accordance with the
Recommended Timing and Methodology for
Requirements: Project proponent/
operator shall limit construction
activities between August 30 and
February 1 or conduct a protocol level
survey in accordance to the Swainson's
Hawk nesting survey. If the qualified
biologist finds active Swainson's hawk
During construction
activities.

If construction
occurs during
nesting period
City of Reedley
shall ensure
that a qualified
biologist
Cit y of
Reedley
Planning
Division;
Qualified
Biologist;
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments Swainson's Hawk Nesting Surveys in California's
Central Valley (Swainson's Hawk Technical
Advisory Committee, 2000). If active Swainson's
hawk nests are found, up to a 0.5-mile nondisturbance buffer should be established by a qualified biologist based on the nest location in
relation to the project activity, the line-of-sight
from the nest to the project activity and
observed hawk behavior at the nest.

All construction personnel should be notified as
to the existence of the buffer zones and to avoid
entering buffer zones during the nesting season.

No ground disturbing activities should occur
within the buffer until the qualified biologist has
confirmed that breeding/nesting is complete,
and the young have fledged the nest.

Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at
the discretion of the qualified biologist.

B10-5 Mitigation Measures for Valley
Elderberry Beetle
Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will
survey the project footprint to confirm the
absence of Valley elderberry longhorn beetle
host plants (blue elderberry). If elderberry
plants are present, the biologist shall flag all
ind ividual shrubs within the project footprint for
avoidance.

Temporary high visibility plastic mesh-type
construction fence shall be installed at least 20
feet from the driplines of elderberry sh rubs,
riparian corridor, or edge of the designated
conservation zone, whichever is closer to the
work area, to prevent encroachment by
construction vehicles and personnel. Fencing
shall also include Environmentally Sensitive Area
signage every 200 feet. If Valley elderberry
longhorn beetle habitat cannot be avoided, the
Environmental Assessment No. 2020- 15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01
nest s, then a 0.5-mile non-disturbance
buffer shall be established, and
construction personnel shal l be
notified.

Requirements: Qualified biologist shall
conduct a preconstruction survey for
the Valley Elderberry Beetle host plans .

If observed, then avoidance and
measures shall be implemented . If not
avoidable then applicant shall provide
evidence to the city that Section 2081
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from
CDFW for Valley elderberry longhorn
beetle has been obtained. If ITP is not
required, then applicant shall provide
letter describing consultation process
and wildlife agency determination .

Prior to ground
disturbing activities.
cond ucts a
Swainson's
Hawk Nesting
Survey
establishes a.smile nondisturbance
buffer and
notifies all
construction
personnel.

City of Reedley
shall ensure
that a qualified
biologist
conducts a
preconstruction
clearance
survey for
Va lley
elderberry
longhorn beetle
host plans and
flags all
individual
shrubs for
avoidance and
install
City of
Reedley
Planning
Division;
Qualified
Biologist;
CDFW
9 City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments applica nt shall prov ide evidence to t he City that
a Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from
CDFW for Va lley elderberry longhorn beetle (if
determined to be required) has been obtained.

If it is determined that an ITP is not required,
the project developer/operator sha ll provide a
letter describing the consultation process and
wildlife agency determination, indicating that an
ITP is not required . The letter shall also identify
the CDFW point of contact and contact
information.

B10-6 Mitigation Measures for Western Pond
Turtle
A qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for western pond tu rt le within 48 hours prior to initiation of
construction activities. If western pond turtle is
observed in the work area a qualified biologist
shall relocate the individual to a suitable
location no less than 200 feet outside of the
construction area. If western pond tu rtle is
observed within the wo rk area during
construction, all work shal l stop until the turtle
has left t he site or can be relocated by a
qualified biologist.

B10-7 M itigation Measures for Raptors and
Nesting Birds
Ground disturbance and vegetation removal
activities sha ll be restricted to the non-breeding
season (September 16 to January 31) when
feasib le. If construction activities occur during
the nesting bird season (February 1 to
10 Requirements: Qualified biologist shall
conduct a preconstruction survey for
the Western Pond Turtle. If observed
then a qualified biologist shall relocate
the western pond turtle. If observed
during construction then al l work shall
stop unt il the turtle has left the site or
the turtle is relocated by the qualified
biologist
Requirements: If construction occurs
during nesting bird season, then a
preconstruction survey shall be
conducted. If nests are found then an
avoidance buffer shall be determined
Within 48 hours
prior to ground
disturbing activities;
During construction
If construction shall
occur during nesting
bird season
(February 1 to
September 15) then
temporary high
visibil ity meshtype
construction
fence at least
20 feet from
elderberry
shrub driplines.

Shall also
ensure
protocols are
followed if
avoidance is
not possible.

If observed
during
construction a
qualified
biologist shall
conduct a
preconstruction
clearance
survey for and
follow
appropriate
relocation
measures.

Qualified
biologist shall
conduct a
preconstruction
nesting bird
City of
Reedley
Planning
Division;
Qualified
Biologist;
City of
Reedley
Planning
Division;
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments September 15), the following mitigation and all construction personnel shall be measures are recommended to reduce impacts notified.
to protected raptor species, and protected
nesting birds.

A preconstruction nesting bird survey
shall be conducted no more than 14
days prior to initiation of ground
disturbance and vegetation removal.

The survey shall be conducted within
the study area and include a 150-foot
buffer for passerines and 500-foot
buffer for other raptors, as feasible.

The survey shall be conducted by a
biologist familiar with the
identification of avian species known
to occur in the region.

If nests are found, an appropriate
avoidance buffer based on the nest
location in relation to the project
activity, the line-of-s ight from the
nest to the project activity, and bird
behavior shall be determined and
demarcated by the biologist with
bright orange construction fencing,
flagging, construction lathe, or other
means to mark the boundary.

All construction personnel shall be
notified as to the existence of the
buffer zones and to avoid entering
buffer zones during the nesting
season. No ground disturbing
activities shall occur within the buffer
until the qualified biologist has
confirmed that breeding/ nesting is
completed, and the young have
fledged the nest . Encroachment into
Enviro nmental Assessment No. 2020-15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01
a preconstruction
nesting bird survey
shall be conducted
no more 14 days
prior to the
initiation of ground
disturbing activities.
survey and
ensure
avoidance
protocols are
followed .

Qualified
Biologist;
11 City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments the buffer sha ll occur only at the
discretion of t he qualified biologist.

B10-8 Conduct Jurisdictional Delineation
Within 2 years prior to development under the Requirements: Completion of a Within 2 years prior A qualified City of Master Plan a qualified biologist shall complete jurisdictional delineation of West to development biologist shall Reedley a jurisdictional delineation of West Reedley Reedley Ditch and map the edge of under the Master complete a Planning Ditch and map the edge of riparian habitat riparian habitat along the Kings River Plan. jurisdictional Division; along the Kings River for avoidance. The for avoidance and preliminary delineation of Qualified jurisdictional delineation shall determine the jurisdictional delineation report that is West Reedl ey Biologist; extent of the jurisdiction for CDFW and RWQCB su bmitted to the City, RWQCB, and Ditch and map CDFW; and shall be conducted in accordance with the CDFW for review and approval. If the edge of RWQCB requirement set forth by each agency. The jurisdictional areas ca nnot be avoided riparian habitat resu lt shall be a preliminary jurisdictional and expected to be impacted, then a along the Kings delineation report that shall be submitted to the Waste Discharge Requirements permit, River for City, RWQCB, and CDFW, as appropriate, for or section 401 Water quality avoidance. City review and approval. Jurisdictional areas shall Certification shall be obtained. If CDFW of Reedley be avoided to the maxim um extent possible. If asserts jurisdictional authority, then a Planning jurisdictional areas are expected to be Streambed Alteration Agreement division shall impacted, then the RWQCB would requ ire a pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of the ensure Waste Discharge Requirement s (WDRs) permit CFGC would also be required appropriate and/or Section 401 Water Quality Certification permits are (depending upon whether or not t he feature obtained .
falls under federal jurisdiction). If CDFW asserts
its jurisdictional authority, then a Stream bed
Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1600
et seq. of the CFGC would also be required prior
to construction within the areas of CDFW
jurisdiction. In this event, the applicant shall
provide evidence to the City that permits have
been obtained from the RWQCB and CDFW.

B10-9 Perform Restoration for Impacts to
Waters and Wetlands
Impacts to waters and wetlands shall be Requirements: Project proponent shall During and after City of Reedley City of mitigated through one or more options to meet mitigate water and wetland impacts construction Planning Reedley the required amount of mitigation as required through acquisition and in-perpetuity activities Division shal l Planning based on direct impacts from project management of the habitat through ensure t hat Division; 12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments development under the mitigation ratios
outlined below. Mitigation for impacts to waters
and wetlands can be achieved t hrough the
acquisition and in-perpetuity management of
simi lar habitat or through the in-lieu funding of
such through an existing mitigation bank.

Internal mitigation lands, or in lieu funding
sufficient to acquire lands shall provide habitat
at a 1:1 ratio for impacted lands, comparable to
habitat to be impacted by individual project
activity. On site restoration of existing
agricultura l areas within the conservation zone
may be sufficient to mitigate for impacts.

B10-10 General Mitigation Measures for
Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands
Potential jurisdictional features identified in the
jurisdictional delineation report shall be
avoided. The edge of riparian habitat at the
Kings River shall be fenced for avoidance with
high visibility plastic mesh-type con struction
fence, at least 20 feet from the dripline of the
riparian corridor, or edge of the designated
conservation zone, whichever is closer to the
work area, to prevent encroachment by
construction vehicles and personnel. Fencing
shall also include Environmentally Sensitive Area
(ESA) signage every 200 ft. If potential
jurisdictional areas at West Reedley Ditch can
be avoided ESA fencing shal l be installed around
this feature too. Additional measures to prevent
impacts to jurisdictional features include: Any
material/spoils generated from project activities
shall be located away from jurisdictional areas
or special-status habitat and protected from
storm water run-off using temporary perimeter
sediment barriers such as berms, silt fences,
fiber rolls (non- monofilament), covers,
Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01
the in-lieu funding. Mitigation for
impactions can also be conducted
through on-s ite restoration of existing
agricultural areas within the
conservation zone.

Requirements: Instal lation of a high
visibility mesh-type fence around the
edge of the riparian habitat at Kings
River and environmentally sensitive
areas (ESA). Installation of ESA signage
every 200 ft of perimeter. Locate any
material s/spoil s away from
jurisdictional or special status habitat
and from storm water run-off using
temporary perimeter sediment
barriers. Storage of materials on
impervious surfaces or plastic ground
cover to prevent spills or leakage from
contaminating the ground. Safely stop
spil lage and clean contaminated area.
project
proponent
performs
appropriate
restoration for
impacts to
waters and
wetlands.

Prior to ground City of Reedley
disturbing activities. Planning
Division shall
ensure that
potential
jurisdictional
features
identified are
avoided and
appropriate
mitigation
measures are
established for
impacts to
riparian
habitats
City of
Reedley
Planning
Division;
Qualified
Designated
environ men
tal
representat
ive or
project
foreman
13 City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
Com- Com- Compliance pliance pliance
Verifi- Verifi- VerifiMitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments sa nd/gravel bags, and straw bale barriers, as
appropriate.

Materials shall be stored on impervious surfaces
or plastic ground covers to prevent any spills or
leakage from contaminating the ground and
generally at least 50 feet from the top of bank
or edge of riparian at the Kings River.

Any spi llage of material shall be stopped if it can
be done safely. The contaminated area wi ll be
cleaned, and any contami nated materials
properly disposed . For all spills, the project
foreman or designated environmental
representative will be notified.

CUL-1 Unanticipated Discovery of
Archaeological Resources
If archaeological resources are encountered
during ground-disturbing activities, work within
50 feet of t he find shall be halted and an
archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the
Interior's Professional Qualification Standards
for archaeology (National Pa rk Service 1983),
sha ll be contacted immediately to evaluate the
find . If necessary, the evaluation may require
preparation of a treatment plan and
archaeological testing for CRHR eligibi lity. If the
discovery proves to be significant under CEQA
and cannot be avoided by the project,
additional work, such as data recovery
excavation, may be wa rranted to mitigate any
significant impacts to historical resources.

ENR-1 Adherence t o General Plan Policies
Applicant shall adhere to General Plan policies
CSOP 4.8.3, COSP 4.8. 7, and COSP 4.8. 10-13 to
14 Requirements: Project proponent shall
halt ground disturbing activities if
archaeological resources are
encountered an archaeologist shall
meet with the Secretary of the
Interior's Professional Qualification
Standards for archaeology to evaluate
find . A treatment plan shall be
prepared if necessary. If find is
significant under CEQA and not
avoidable then data recovery
excavation may be warranted .

If archaeological
resources a re
encountered during
ground-disturbing
activities.

Requirements: Applicant shall comply Prior to project
with all applicable General Plan Policies approval .

Archaeologist
shall ensure
that ground
disturbing
activities are
halted and
appropriate
protocol s are
fol lowed for the
evaluation and
treatment of
the
archaeological
resource.

City of Reedley
Community
Qualified
Archaeologi
st :

Secretary of
the
Interior's
Professional
Qualificatio
n Standards
for
archaeology
California
Regi ster of
Historical
Resources
City of
Reedley
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Com• Com• Com•
pliance pliance pliance
Verifi· Verifi- Verifi•
Mitigation Measure/ Monitoring Responsible cation cation cation Condition of Approval Action Required Timing Requirements Agency Initial Date Comments the extent feasible as determined by the City's
Community Development Director or assignee.

TCR·l Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal
Resources
In the event that cultural resources of Native
American origin that may be considered tribal
cultural resources are identified during
construction, all earth disturbing work within SO
feet of the find must be temporarily suspended
or red irected until an archaeologist has
evaluated the nature and significance of the find
and an appropriate Native American
representative, based on the nature of the find,
is consulted. If the archaeologist and Native
American representative determine that the
resource is a tribal cu ltural resource and thus
significant under CEQA, a mitigation plan shall
be prepared and implemented in accordance
with state guidelines and in consultation with
Native American groups. The plan shall include
avoidance of the resource or, if avoidance of th e
resource is infeasible, the plan shall outline the
appropriate treatment of the resource in
coordination with the archeologist and the
appropriate Native American tribal
representative( s). This might include re-burying
the cultu ral material, radiocarbon dating, faunal
analysis, lithic analysis, etc.

Environmental Assessment No. 2020-15
Reedley Annexation 2020-01
including CSOP 4.8.3, COSP 4.8.7, and
COSP 4.8.10-13.

Requirements: If a cultural resource of
Native American origin is found then
qualified archaeologist and Native
Ameri can representative shall be
contacted to determine if resource is
significant under CEQA and implement
mitigation plan.

If cultural re sources
of Native American
origin are identified
during co nstruction .

Development
Director or
as signee shall
ensure
applicant
adheres to all
applicable
General Plan
policies.

Qualified
Archaeologi st
and Native
American
representative
shall ensure all
earth disturbing
work within SO
feet of the find
is temporarily
suspended and
prepare a
mitigation plan.

If avoidance is
infeasible then
ensure that the
plan outlines
appropriate
treatment of
the resource.

Community
Developme
nt Director
or as signee
Qualified
Archaeologi
st; Native
American
Representat
ive
15 City of Reedley
Manning Avenue Annexation 2020-01 Project
This page intentionally left blank.
16 Construction Work Hours
City of Reedley
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
http://www.reedley .com
Excavation, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or structure at any time other than during the following hours, except by special permit granted by the Community Development Director or City Engineer:
• Monday - Friday 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
• Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
• Sunday Not Allowed
• Holidays (as listed below) 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
o New Year's Day (January 1 );
o Memorial Day (the last Monday in May);
o Labor Day (the first Monday in September);
o Thanksgiving Day (the fourth Thursday in November);
o Christmas Day (December 25);
o Monday, when New Year's Day or Christmas Day Falls on the preceding Sunday; and
o Friday, when New Year's Day or Christmas Day Falls on the succeeding Saturday.

To apply for a special permit to operate outside of the hours listed above, contact:

City of Reedley Building Division - (559)637-4200 ext. 225 OR
City of Reedley Engineering Department- (559)637-4200 ext. 295 March 27, 2020

CITY OF REEDLEY
Fire Administration
Jerry Isaak, Chief
1060 D Street, Reedley CA 93654
559-637-4230
To: Ellen Moore, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
Re: Site Plan Review Application No. 2020-01
• APNs Included in Annexation and Pre-Zone: 368-350-17, -31 , -32, & -33, 365-072-30T & -31 The Fire Department has the following comments regarding the above referenced application. • Required fire lanes, emergency access roadways and emergency vehicle turnarounds are outlined and dimensions will be marked and identified on the construction drawings. • Fire lane sign locations and the sign detail will be marked and shown on the construction drawings. • The site shall be provided with a looped underground fire line providing water supply to all on site fire hydrants and building fire sprinkler systems. • Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 of the California Fire Code and any local amendments shall have a hydrant within 150 feet of the fire department connections unless otherwise approved by the Fire Chief. • Buildings equipped with an Automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903 of the California Fire Code and any local amendments, shall have a hydrant within 150 feet of the fire department connections unless otherwise approved by the Fire Chief. • FDC's shall be facing the access road and shall be set back a maximum of 2 feet from the face of the curb or the rear of the sidewalk, at a height of 2 to 3 feet above the finished grade. When FDC's are installed in planters, a 3'X3' square concrete pad is required. • Tactical considerations may require additional hydrants and will be considered on a project by project basis .
• Fire hydrants located along a public or private street , or on-site, shall have an unobstructed clearance of not less than 30 feet (15 feet either side of hydrant) in accordance with CVC 22514. • Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. The road shall be designed to accommodate a 78,000 lb. vehicle.
• Fire protection equipment and hydrants shall be clearly identified . All fire department connections , post indicator valves and on-site fire hydrants shall be painted an approved 'safety' yellow. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of blue reflective markers on the fire apparatus access road( s).
• Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height shall be provided with at least two approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus.
• The minimum outside turning radius is 42 feet for required access roadways . Greater radius up to 60 feet may be required if fire department aerial ladder truck access is required. • Review the layout for Building #4 for possible circulation issues.

May 1, 2020
Ellen Moore
Associate Planner
City of Reedley
Community Development Department
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93 654
Kings Canyon Unified School District
1801 10th Street - Reedley CA 93654
1502 "I" Street - Reedley CA 9365 (mailing)
(559) 305-7024 Fax (559) 637-1186
Subject: Annexation Application No. 2020-01; Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01; Site Plan Review Application No. 2020-01 South Side of Manning Avenue, East of the Kings River
Dear Ms. Moore :

This letter is in response to your request for comment on the above-referenced applications, the approval of which would result in the annexation of approximately 58 acres to the City of Reedley, as well as the pre-zoning of land, as follows: Approximately 32 acres would be pre-zoned for community commercial use, 11 acres would be pre-zoned for residential use under the R-1-6 zone district and 15 acres would be pre-zoned for open space use under the RCO zone district. Site Plan Review No. 2020-0 I would master plan the proposed 32-acre community commercial area.

The I I-acre area proposed for R-1-6 zoned residential use would likely be developed at about 5 units per acre, which would yield approximately 55 single family residences. New residential development would generate students that will need to be housed in District schools. Based on the District's current student generation rates, it is estimated that the residential development within the annexation area could generate the following number of students: 22 in grades K-5; 13 in grades 6-8 and 16 in grades 9-12.

The potential community commercial development on a 32-acre portion of the proposed annexation area would affect the District by generating employees. The children of employees living in the District will need to be housed in District schools.

The project site is currently within the attendance area of Riverview K-8 School (8862 S. Lac Jae Avenue) and Reedley High School (740 W. North Avenue). Riverview K-8 School has a current enrollment of 487 students and an operational capacity of 430. Reedley High School has a current enrollment of 1,890 and an operational capacity of 1,500.

The District has acquired a site for a new high school and new elementary school in the south Reedley area. The District will potentially construct additional facilities within the next five years, but timing will ultimately be dependent on funding availability.

The District currently levies a school facilities fee of $3.79 per square foot for residential development, and $0.61 per square foot for commercial development. On May 12, 2020, the District Board will be considering an increase in the fees to $4.08 for residential development and $0.66 for commercial/industrial development. If approved, the increased fees will go into effect on July 11 , 2020.

New development on the subject property will be subject to the fee in place at the time school facilities fees are paid.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me if you have any questions on this letter. Sincey ~ ------··· ···· ··· John Campbell
Superintendent
Date: ______ _
OWNER/DEVELOPER:

Name:

Address:

Contact: Person:

Fees payable to:

DEVELOPER FEE CERTIFICATION

KINGS CANYON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

BUSINESS OFFICE
1801 10111 St, Reedley CA 93654
Mailing address: 1502 I St, Reedley CA 93654
(559) 305-7020 FAX: (559) 637-1186
In an effort to comply with soc ial d istanci 11g, please Ml\lL develope1· fee to above address and a receipt 1Niil be r-etu rned to vou bv ma il . Tha nk you for your SUBDIVISION NO. ______ _ LOT NO. ______ _
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:

Q SFR Q Duplex Q Triplex QPUD
0 Apartment Complex [number of units]
Q Mobile Home Q Addition to SFR
------------------
Telephone: Qother ___________ _
DEVELOPMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT: [check one]
0 Government Code section 65995(b)(1 ): Residential Development:
0 Government Code section 65995 (b)(2):
square feet @ $4.08 sq. ft. =
Commercial or Ind ustrial: square feet @ $0.66 sq. ft. = -------
Development Address:
_____ Kings Canyon Unified School District certifies that the above fees have been PAID IN FULL Kings Canyon Unified School District certifies that the above project is EXEMPT from the _____ abovefeesbecause --------------------------------- NOTICE: Pursuant to Assembly Bill 3081 (CHAP 549, STATS. 1996), this will serve to notify you that the 90-day period in which you may protest the fe e or other payment identified above will begin to run from the date the fee is paid to the District, unless ll1e fee was imposed by a City or County as a condition of your projects approval, in which case , the 90 day protest period began at the time your project was approved. You have 180 days from the 1 ctelivery of the notice to file an action.

KCUSD Contact Persons: Adele Nikkel , CFO, Cassandra Cook (559) 305-7032, or Alma Zepeda (559) 305-7035 0 City of Reedley
Community Dev Dep't
1733 9th Street
Reedley , CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
Q City of Orange Cove
Building Dept
633 Sixth Street
Orange Cove, CA 93646
(559) 626-4488
Q Fresno County
Dev Services Division
2220 Tulare , 6th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 600-4560
Q Tulare County
Resource Management Agency
5961 S. Mooney Blvd .

Visalia , CA 93277
(559) 624-7000
Unless an even shorter time is specified herein , this certificate is valid only if the permit to which it applies is actually issued no more than 180 days after its date.

District Signature KCUSD
Cc: City/County Owner/Developer KCUSD Revised 7-11 -2020 April 3, 2020
Ellen Moore
Associate Planner
City of Reedley
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Dear Ms. Moore:

Subject: Comments regarding concurrent applications: Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01, Annexation Application No. 2020-01, Site Plan Review Application No. 2020-1, for territory located on the southwest corner of Manning Avenue and I Street.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. From the material provided to this office, my understanding of the project description is as follows:

Annexation Application No. 2020-1, a request to approve annexation of the 58 acres into the City of Reedley for territory generally located at the southwest corner of Manning Avenue and I Street (Reorganization name to be determined}.

Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01, a request to approve a prezone of approximately 32 acers of land from the County AL-20{Limited Agricultural} Zone District to the Reedley CC ( Central and Commercial}Zone District, 11 acres of land from the County AL-20 (Limited Agricultural} Zone District to the Reedley R-1-6 (One Family Residential} Zone District, and 15 acres of land from the County RC-40{Resource Conservation} and AL-20{Limited Agricultural} Zone District to the Reedley RC (Resource Conservations District} Zone District for territory generally located on the southwest corner of Manning Avenue and I Street .

Site Plan Review Application No. 2020-1, a request to approve a site plan map consisting of 9 commercial buildings for territory located on the southwest corner of Manning Avenue and I Street.

General comments
The Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission {LAFCo} regulates, through approval or denial, the boundary changes proposed by local agencies or individuals. LAFCo's objectives are to:
• Encourage orderly formation and development of agencies; • Encourage consistency with spheres of influence and recommended reorganization of agencies; • Encourage orderly urban development and preservation of open space patterns; • Encourage conservation of prime agricultural lands and open space areas; and • Identify and address disadvantaged unincorporated communities.

LAFCo should be identified in the city's environmental document as a Responsible Agency under CEQA whose role is to consider changes of organizations and spheres of influence. Commission action on the Ellen Moore

annexation request should be noted in the environmental document. As a Responsible Agency, the Commission is required to review and consider the City's environmental documents prior to taking its action. A Responsible Agency complies with CEQA by considering the environmental analysis prepared by the Lead Agency and by reaching its own conclusions on whether and how to approve the project.

The Commission may then make a finding that it independently reviewed and considered the information in the environmental document and that the environmental document is sufficient to support a determination on the proposed reorganization.

Unless a territory is at full build-out, LAFCo law and Commission policy require that territory be prezoned before it may be annexed to a city so that LAFCo may find that the proposed project is consistent with a city's general plan. Given the multiple proposed zone districts, please be sure to identify what land is prezoned to the appropriate zone district in the annexation proposal area.

Be advised that extraneous conditions of prezoning ordinance bills can impair the Commission's ability to approve projects. LAFCo staff is available to review and comment on the city's draft prezoning ordinance to ensure that it meets Commission standards.

It is important to note that LAFCo standards for annexation state a proposal for annexation is acceptable if one of the following can be providing by the City:
• There is existing substantial development provide the City confines its area requested to that area needed to include the substantial development and create logical boundaries. • Development exists that requires urban services which can be provided by the City • If no development exists, at least 50% of the area proposed for annexation has:
a. Approved tentative subdivision map(s)(S.F. residential) b. Approved site plan (for other uses)
Project-specific comments
A checklist for items and requirements necessary for a filed application can be found on the Fresno LAFCo website under the applications and documents tab and should be reviewed prior to submitting a formal application.

A copy of stamped NOD filed with the Fresno County Clerk's Office and a Copy of paid fish and Game fee is and item for a complete application.

If uninhabited and not all landowners have consented to annexation the proposal will be noticed 21 - day prior to public hearing. It is important to note that a complete application is necessary five-days prior to the noticing period.

The affected territory includes a portion of the Kings River (APNs 365-072-30T and 365-072-31). Will Annexation Application No.2020-01 include detachment from the Consolidated Irrigation District for this area?
LAFCo staff request that an application submittal meeting be scheduled prior to submitting a formal application.

Ellen Moore

As we have discussed, staff and the Commission will evaluate this project in light of the Commission's adopted policies and procedures, which include minimizing "creation of peninsulas and corridors, or other distortion of boundaries." It is therefore important that Reedley application provides sufficient context as to how this proposal contributes to "planned, well ordered, efficient development patterns and service areas, and does not encourage urban sprawl." Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have any questions, please contact me at (559) 600-0604.

Sincerely,
Juan Lara
LAFCo Analyst II
April 30, 2020
Ellen Moore, Associate Planner
City of Reedley
Community Development Dept.
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
County of Fresno

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING
STEVEN E. WHITE, DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: City of Reedley: Annexation, SPR, Pre-Zone Request for Comments Dear Ms. Moore:

The County of Fresno appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the subject City of Reedley Annex Application No. 2020-01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 and Site Plan Review Application No. 2020-01 .

Transportation/Traffic:

The Road Maintenance and Operations Division of the Fresno County Department of Public Works and Planning offers the following comments:

The proposed annexation, pre-zone and site plan review will not have a direct impact to County roads. The uses proposed as part of the site plan review should require a Traffic Impact Study (TIS). As a result of the TIS, mitigation may be required to address impacts to County road segments and intersections.

Air Quality/Hazards and Hazardous Materials/ Utilities and Service Systems:

The Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division offers the following comments:
• Since specific future retail/commercial tenants for this application have not been identified, the full range of CC Zoning uses must be considered. The potential adverse impacts could include (but are not limited to) storage of hazardous materials and/or wastes , including medical waste, solid waste, water degradation, excessive noise, and odors. For recommended Conditions of Approval for future residential/ commercial uses please see attached comments from the Environmental Health Division.

Je[
Development Services and Capital Projects Division
JS:

G:\4360Devs&Pln\PROJSEC\PROJDOCS\Environmental\OAR\City of Reedley\Annex Appl No. 2020-21 , Pre-Zone & SPR\OAR CoR ANX 2020-1 SPR CMMT Ltr.docx

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION
2220 Tulare Street, Sixth Floor / Fresno, California 93721 / Phone (559) 600-4497 I 600-4022 I 600-4540 I FAX 600-4200 The County of Fresno is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer Ellen Moore
April 30, 2020

cc. Steven E. White, Director
John Thompson, Assistant Director
Bernard Jimenez, Assistant Director
William M. Kettler, Development Services and Capital Projects Division Chris Motta, Development Services and Capital Projects Division Marianne Mollring, Development Services and Capital Projects Division Deep Sidhu, R.E.H.S. , Environmental Health Division
Wendy Nakagawa, Design Division/Transportation Planning DATE:

TO:

FROM :

SUBJECT:

April 30, 2020
Jeremy Shaw, Planner
Inter Office
Memo
Development Services and Capital Projects Division , Current Planning Unit Eyasu Wolde, Planner ~ -- ·
Development Services and Capital Projects Division, Policy Planning Unit Outside Agency Review - City of Reedley Annexation Application 2020-01 , APNs: 368- 350-17, 31 , 32, 33 and a portion of the Kings River APNs 365-072-30T and 31 .

Annexation of the subject 58-acre territory to the City requires a Notice of Intent (NOi) to be submitted to the County 30 days prior to the submission of the annexation application to the Fresno Local Agency Formation commission (LAFCo) for a determination of consistency of the proposed annexation with the Standards of Annexation contained in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno. The NOi must include the Resolution of Annexation, and Pre-Zoning of the territory approved by the City Council , and approval of the entitlements by the City (City Council or Planning Commission), and the environmental assessment conducted by the city for the project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), if applicable to the project If you have any questions, please email me at [email protected] or call me at (559) 600- 4305.

G:14360Devs&Pln\PLANNING\General Planl lmplementation & OARs\County\OAR\OAR City of Reedley Annex 2020-01\OAR City of Reedley Annex 2020-01.doc County of Fresno

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEAL TH
March 23, 2020
Ellen Moore, Associate Planner
City of Reedley
Community Development Department
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Dear Ms. Moore:

PROJECT NUMBER: ANX 2020-01, Prezone 2020-01, SPR 2020-01 LU0020617
2600
Annexation Application No. 2020-01 pertains to the annexation of approximately 58 acres into the City of Reedley and detachment from the Fresno County Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District. The annexation area consists of four parcels (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32, and 368-350-33) and a portion of the Kings River (APNs 365-072-30T and 365-072-31 ).

The annexation area is generally located east of the centerline of the Kings River, south of Manning Avenue, west of the commercial corridor located on the southeast corner of Manning Avenue and I Street, and north of the existing Riverglen single family residential subdivision. The proposed annexation is adjacent to the existing City of Reedley City Limits on three sides, and along the western boundary of the annexation area there is an approximate 1,000-foot opening located in the SWC of the subject territory that serves as the connection point to the County of Fresno. The proposed annexation is within the City of Reedley's adopted Sphere of Influence, and the subject property has a Community Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Open Space Planned Land Use Designation pursuant to the City of Reedley 2030 General Plan. The proposed annexation would remove an area that is substantially surrounded by the existing City of Reedley City Limits, development is imminent, and it does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act to promote the planned, orderly, efficient development of an area.

Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01 pertains to the pre-zoning of approximately 58 acres in preparation for annexation consistent with the Reedley 2030 General Plan. Approximately 32 acres is proposed to be pre-zoned to the CC (Central and Community Commercial) zone district, approximately 11 acres is proposed to be pre-zoned to the R-1-6 (One Family Residential) zone district, and approximately 15 acres, which includes a portion of the Kings River, is proposed to be pre-zoned to the RCO (Resource Conservation and Open Space) zone district.

Site Plan Review Application No. 2020-01 pertains to the master planning of approximately 11 acres of commercially designated land (APNs 368-350-17, 368-350-31 , 368-350-32, and 368-350-33), consisting of 9 commercial buildings totaling 178,500 square feet with shared access to 487 parking spaces to serve those buildings. Proposed uses identified in the site plan include retail stores, drivethrough restaurants, dine-in restaurants, a gas station and a hotel. Proposed ingress/egress to the site would be available off of Manning Avenue and off of the proposed southern extension of Manning Avenue which would be accessed at the Manning Avenue/I Street intersection. Also proposed is the dedication of land directly east of the Kings River that is currently designated as Open Space in the 2030 General Plan for the future development of the Reedley Parkway. The proposed master site plan meets the 25% imminent development requirement for annexation. It should be noted that the portion Promotion, preservation and protection of the community's health 1221 Fulton Street /P. 0. Box 11867, Fresno, CA 93775
(559) 600-3271 · FAX (559) 455-4646
The County of Fresno is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer www.co.fresno.ca.us · www.fcdph.org
Ellen Moore
March 23, 2020
ANX 2020-01, Prezone 2020-01 , SPR 2020-01

of the Kings River proposed to be annexed to create a logical jurisdictional boundary is not included in this calculation. The proposed master site plan is consistent with the proposed pre-zoning designations and the Reedley 2030 General Plan.

APN: 368-350-17, -31, -32, -33, 365-072-30T, -31 ZONING: CC, R-1 -6, RCO ADDRESS: SWC Manning Avenue and 'I' Street and centerline Kings River Comments/Concerns:

Since specific future retail/commercial tenants for this application have not been identified, the full range of 'CC' zoning uses must be considered. The potential adverse impacts could include (but are not limited to) storage of hazardous materials and/or wastes , medical waste, solid waste, water quality degradation, excessive noise, and odors.

Recommended Conditions of Approval for Future Residential/Retail/Commercial Uses:
• Construction permits for the proposed project should be subject to assurance of sewer capacity of the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. Concurrence should be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). For more information, contact staff at (559) 445-5116.
• Construction permits for the proposed project should be subject to assurance that the City of Reedley community water system has the capacity and quality to serve this project. Concurrence should be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking WaterSouthern Branch. For more information call (559) 447-3300. • For proposed retail food establishments (including Hotel self-service kitchens), prior to issuance of building permits. The tenant shall submit complete food facility plans and specifications to the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division , for review and approval. Prior to operation , the applicant(s) shall apply for and obtain a permit to operate a food facility from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division. A permit, once issued, is nontransferable. Contact the Consumer Food Protection Program at (559) 600-3357 for more information.
• Prior to operation, future tenants may be required to apply for and obtain a license to sell alcoholic beverages. Contact the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Department at (559) 225-6334 for more information.
• If the applicant(s) propose to use and/or store hazardous materials and/or hazardous wastes, they shall meet the requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Division 20, Chapter 6.95, and the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4.5. Any business that handles a hazardous material or hazardous waste may be required to submit a Hazardous Materials Business Plan pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Division 20, Chapter 6.95, Section 25507 (http://cers.calepa .ca.gov/). Contact the Fresno County Hazmat Compliance Program at (559) 600-3271 for more information. • The applicant(s) may be required to update the Medical Waste Permit from the California Department of Health Services, Medical Waste Management Program. Call (916) 449-5671 for more information.
• Should a body art facility (i.e. tattoo, piercing , branding or permanent cosmetics facility) be proposed , prior to issuance of building permits, the tenant shall submit complete body art facility 2 Ellen Moore
March 23, 2020
ANX 2020-01 , Prezone 2020-01, SPR 2020-01

plans and specifications to the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division, for review and approval. Contact the Body Art Program at (559) 600-3357 for more information.
• Construction and future projects have the potential to expose nearby residents to elevated noise levels. Consideration should be given to your City's municipal code. • As a measure to protect ground water, all water wells and/or septic systems that exist or have been abandoned within the project area should be properly destroyed by an appropriately licensed contractor.
• Should any underground storage tank(s) be found during the project, the applicant shall apply for and secure an Underground Storage Tank Removal Permit from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division. Contact the Certified Unified Program Agency at (559) 600-3271 for more information.

The following comments pertain to the demolition of any existing structures:
• Should the structure(s) have an active rodent or insect infestation, the infestation should be abated prior to demolition of the structure(s) in order to prevent the spread of vectors to adjacent properties.
• In the process of demolishing the existing structure(s), the contractor may encounter asbestos containing construction materials and materials coated with lead based paints. • If asbestos containing materials are encountered , contact the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District at (559) 230-6000 for more information. • If the structure(s) were constructed prior to 1979 or if lead-based paint is suspected to have been used in the structures, then prior to demolition work the contractor should contact the following agencies for current regulations and requirements:
• California Department of Public Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, at (510) 620-5600.
• United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, at (415) 947-8000. • State of California, Industrial Relations Department, Division of Occupational Safety and Health , Consultation Service (CAL-OSHA) at (559) 454-5302.

REVIEWED BY:

Kevin Tsuda, R.E.H.S.

Environmental Health Specialist II (559) 600-3271
cc: Rogers, Moreno, Malavong Arnold , Oung & Yang- Environmental Health Division (CT. 67.00) 3 The information given below is intended to provide general guidance related to the RTMF and is not intended to be, nor is, legal advice. Applicants for developments that might be subject to the RTMF should submit the details of their project to the RTMF Joint Powers Agency for determination of the amount due, if any.

INFORMATIONAL SUMMARY

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE
Background: Measure "C" Extension, passed by the voters of Fresno County in November 2006, included a provision for the establishment of a Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF). The purpose of the fee is to create a mechanism for new development to pay its fair share of the cost of road improvements based on the expected traffic impacts generated by the development.

Date of Effectiveness: The RTMF is effective for all developments approved on or after January · 1, 2010, unless the development is exempt for of one of the reasons described below.

Developments Subiect to the Fee: Generally, all new developments occurring in Fresno County are required to pay the RTMF, with amounts varying based on the expected traffic impact of the development, less the development falls into one or more of the following exempt categories:
a) The development is to be used for public or non-profit education b) The development is for use by a government agency for a governmental function (government-owned commercial developments are not exempt) c) The development is the subject of an unexpired tentative map, vested ter:,tative map, or subdivision map approved prior to January 1, 2010. d) Renovations or improvements to existing residential buildings are exempt if the number of dwelling units is not increased. Renovations or improvements to existing non-residential buildings are exempt if the floor space is not increased.

Payment of the Fee: The RTMF must be paid to the RTMF Joint Powers Agency, located at 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201, Fresno, CA. Please call ahead to (559) 233- 4148, extension 200, to ensure that staff will be on hand to process your payment. The amount to be paid is based on the number and type of dwelling unit(s) if any, and the square footage of floorspace and type of non-residential building(s) if any. The rate to be paid is the rate in effect at the time of payment.

Payment may be made at any time prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. A Record of Payment will be issued as proof that the RTMF obligations, if any, have been met. Developments exempt under points A, B, or C above require a Record of Payment , from the RTMF Joint Powers Agency, even though the amount paid will be zero. A service fee may be charged for issuance of a Record of Payment.

I acknowledge that I have read and understand this information, and am aware that the City or County will not issue a certificate of occupancy until I have fulfilled my obligations, if any, regarding the RTMF.

Representative of the Applicant Date

RECORD OF PAYMENT OF REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE JOINT POWERS AGENCY 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201, Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 233-4148, ext. 200 www.fresnocog.org

APPLICANT
Name: _____________ _
Contact Person: __________ _
Address: ______ _ _ ____ _
Telephone Number: _ ____ _ _ __ _

PROJECT
Job Site Address. _____ __ _
Tract Number ________ _
Lot/Parcel Number ______ _
Building Permit Number ____ _
Building Permit Issue....._ ____ _ DATE
Final Map Recorde....._ _____ _ DATE
Parcel Map, Tentative Map filed, Deemed Complete by Agency _____ _ DATE Rezone Approval (attach relevant documents if applicable)~~---- DATE Government
Commercial/Retail
Commercial/Office/Service
Industrial
Other Non-Residential

25.00 Check# -- Total Amount Due - --- --
Applicant Date
Representative of Permit Issuing Agency Date Issuing Agency

DISPOSITION OF RTMF
__ __.RTMF Joint Powers Agency certifies that the above fees have been PAID IN FULL _ __ RTMF Joint Powers Agency certifies that the above project is EXEMPT from the requirement to pay the RTMF because __________ ______ _ Representative of the RTMF JP A Date
Note: The fees shown are those in effect as of March 1, 2020. Fees are subject to change. The amounts due will be based on the fees in effect on the day the fee is paid.

This form must be validated by the Fresno County Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Joint Powers Agency and returned to the Permit Issuing Agency prior to final inspection or certificate of occupancy.

NOTICE OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL
You have the right to appeal the application of the RTMF to the Board of the RTMF Joint Powers Agency if you feel that the RTMF is being applied incorrectly. The procedure to file an appeal is:
1) The Applicant must first tender any required payment in full or provide satisfactory evidence of arrangements to pay the fee when due or ensure performance of the conditions necessary to meet the requirements of the imposition (Gov. Code§ 66020(a)(1 )). The JPA shall determine if the requirement under Gov. Code§ 66020(a)(1 )) has been satisfied. 2) The applicant then submits a letter to the JPA stating that payment was tendered or shall be tendered under protest along with the reasons they believe that the fee as calculated by JPA staff is not justified, and the amount of fee the applicant believes to be correct. This letter must be accompanied by a copy of the Record of Payment. The appeal must be filed within 90 days after the imposition of the fee (Gov. Code§ 66020 (d)(1 )). Failure to file a timely appeal will preclude a subsequent lawsuit.
3) If the appeal is based on some document other than the Record of Payment, such as a document issued by a local jurisdiction indicating the starting date of vesting rights or a document showing earlier payments for which the applicant wants credit, then copies of this document must be included in the additional documentation mentioned in the previous bullet point. The Applicant has the option to submit additional documentation to support their appeal.

The Applicant must submit at their own expense twenty-two copies of each supporting document they want considered. The copies are for the use of the JPA and will not be returned to the applicant.
4) If the appeal is based on a technical issue related to traffic or trip generation then the Applicant must submit a technical analysis for consideration by the JPA. The Applicant is responsible for the cost of this analysis. 5) The RTMF-JPA will act on appeals during the open portion of a Board meeting within 180 days of receipt of the written appeal. The Applicant will have a chance to speak on behalf of their request and to answer questions. Based on its consideration of the appeal, the Board may choose to set the RTMF for the Applicant's project at the amount stated in the appeal, the amount recommended by Staff based on the RTMF as generally applied, or some other amount deemed appropriate based on the information presented in the Appeal.

If you challenge the applicability or amount of the RTMF in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above or in written correspondence delivered to the JPA at, or prior to, the public hearing.

San J aqu·n V I ey

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
July 16, 2020
Ellen Moore
Community Development Department
City of Reedley
1 733 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
zJ
EALTHY A R LIVING ...

Project: Annexation Application No. 2020-01, Pre-Zone Application No. 2020-01, Site Plan Review (SPR) Application No. 2020-01 - Kings River Development
District CEQA Reference No: 20200343
Dear Ms. Moore:

The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the project referenced above frpm the City of Reedley (City) consisting of the following:
(1) The annexation of approximately 58 acres consisting of four parcels (APNs: 368- 350-17, 368-350-31, 368-350-32 and 368-350-33) and a portion of the Kings River (APNs: 365-072-30T and 365-072-31 ). Development is imminent. (2) The pre-zoning of approximately 58 acres: approximately 32 acres to be prezoned to CC (Central and Community Commercial) zone district, approximately 11 acres to be re-zoned R-16 (One Family Residential) zone district, and approximately 15 acres , which includes a portion of the Kings River, to be pre-zoned RCO (Resource Conservation and Open Space) zone district.
(3) The SPR application pertains to approximately 11 acres of commercially designated land (APNs: 368-350-17 , 368-350-31, -32 and -33) consisting of 9 commercial buildings totaling 178,500 square feet. Proposed uses identified in the site plan includes retail stores, drive-through restaurants, and dine-in restaurants, a gas station, and a hotel. (Project).

The Project is located at the Manning Avenue Extension in Reedley, CA. The District offers the following comments:

Northern Region
4800 Er,terpr·se Wc!f
Modesto, C1\ 95356 8 7' 8
Tei: 209 1 557 6400 Fi-\X 12091 557 6475
Samir Sheikh
Execuuve OirectoriA1r Pollution Co ntrol Officer
Central Region (Main Office)
'99J E Gr.t· diurg ;l,•1enue
i=r8sno CA 93 72 02.1.\
Tel 5S91 230 6000 FAX- 15591 230 11061
·,vww v3ileya1r org w•:vw health1n,riiv1nq com
Southern Region
J.1946 F-lyo'/P,r Camt
8Jker~'1P,j(i C,\ 93308 97':;
Tel 6611392 5500 Fil.X (66' 392 5585
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
District Reference No. 20200343
July 16, 2020
1) Project Related Emissions

The annexation or prezoning will not have an impact on air quality. However, future development will contribute to the overall decline in air quality due to construction activities, increased traffic, and ongoing operational emissions.

The District's initial review of the Project concludes that emissions resulting from construction and/or operation of the Project may exceed the following thresholds of significance: 100 tons per year of carbon monoxide (CO), 10 tons per year of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 10 tons per year of reactive organic gases (ROG), 27 tons per year of oxides of sulfur (SOx), 15 tons per year of particulate matter of 10 microns or less in size (PM10), or 15 tons per year of particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in size (PM2.5). The District recommends that a more detailed preliminary review of the Project be conducted for the Project's construction and operational emissions. The additional environmental review of the Project's potential impact on air quality should consider the following items:
1 a) Construction Emissions: Construction emissions are short-term emissions and should be evaluated separately from operational emissions. Equipment exhaust, as well as fugitive dust emissions should be quantified.

For reference, the District's annual criteria thresholds of significance for construction are: 100 tons per year of carbon monoxide (CO), 10 tons per year of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 10 tons per year of reactive organic gases (ROG), 27 tons per year of oxides of sulfur (SOx), 15 tons per year of particulate matter of 10 microns or less in size (PM10), or 15 tons per year of particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in size (PM2.5).

The District recommends that the County consider the use of the cleanest reasonably available off-road construction practices (i.e. eliminating unnecessary idling) and fleets, as set forth in §2423 of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and Part 89 of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations as a mitigation measure to reduce Project related impacts from construction related exhaust emissions.
1 b) Operational Emissions: Emissions from stationary sources and mobile sources should be analyzed separately.

For reference, the annual criteria thresholds of significance for operation of permitted and non-permitted sources each are: 100 tons per year of carbon monoxide (CO), 10 tons per year of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 10 tons per year of reactive organic gases (ROG), 27 tons per year of oxides of sulfur (SOx), 15 tons San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
District Reference No. 20200343
July 16, 2020

per year of particulate matter of 10 microns or less in size (PM 10), or 15 tons per year of particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in size (PM2.5). 1 c) Recommended Model: Project related criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operational sources should be identified and quantified.

Emissions analysis should be performed using CalEEMod (California Emission Estimator Model), which uses the most recent approved version of relevant Air Resources Board (ARB) emissions models and emission factors. CalEEMod is available to the public and can be downloaded from the CalEEMod website at:
www.caleemod.com.
1 d) Project Related Operational Emissions- Cleanest Available The San Joaquin Valley will not be able to attain stringent health-based federal air quality standards without significant reductions in emissions from heavy-heavy duty (HHD) Trucks, the single largest source of NOx emissions in the San Joaquin Valley. The District recently adopted the 2018 PM2.5 Plan which includes significant new reductions from HHD Trucks, including emissions reductions by 2023 through the implementation of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation, which requires truck fleets operating in California to meet the 2010 0.2 g/bhp-hr NOx standard by 2023. Additionally, to meet the federal air quality standards by the 2020 to 2024 attainment deadlines, the District's Plan relies on a significant and immediate transition of heavy duty truck fleets to zero or near-zero emissions technologies, including the near-zero truck standard of 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOx established by the California Air Resources Board.

For development projects which typically generate a high volume of heavy duty truck traffic (e.g. "high-cube" warehouse or distribution center), there are heavy duty trucks traveling to-and-from from the project location at longer trip length distances for potential distribution. To reduce impacts from operational mobile source emissions, the District recommends that the following clean air measures be considered for inclusion in the environmental document/assessment. • Advise fleets associa_ted with Project operational activities to utilize the cleanest available HHD truck technologies, including zero and near-zero (0.02 g/bhp-hr NOx) technologies as feasible.
• Advise all on-site service equipment (cargo handling, yard hostlers, forklifts, pallet jacks, etc.) to utilize zero-emissions technologies as feasible.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
District Reference No. 20200343
July 16, 2020

• Advise fleets associated with future development projects to be subject to the best practices (i.e. eliminating unnecessary idling).

In addition, the District recommends that the City include clean air measures to reduce project related operational impacts through incorporation ·of design elements, for example, increased energy efficiency, reducing vehicle miles traveled, etc. More information on mitigation measures can be found at:
http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/ceqa idx.htm.
1 e) Operational Related Emissions - Under-fired Charbroilers Projects for restaurants with under-fired charbroilers may pose the potential for immediate health risk, particularly when located in densely developed locations near sensitive receptors. Since the cooking of meat can release carcinogenic PM2.5 species like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, controlling emissions from new under-fired charbroilers will have a substantial positive impact on public health. The air quality impacts on neighborhoods near restaurants with underfired charbroilers can be significant on days when meteorological conditions are stable, when dispersion is limited and emissions are trapped near the surface within the surrounding neighborhoods. This potential for neighborhood-level concentration of emissions during evening or multi-day stagnation events raises environmental concerns.

Furthermore, reducing commercial charbroiling em1ss1ons is essential to achieving attainment of multiple federal PM2.5 standards and associated health benefits in the Valley. Therefore, the District recommends that the environmental document include a measure requiring the assessment and potential installation, as technologically feasible , of particulate matter emission control systems for new large restaurants operating under-fired charbroilers. The District is available to assist the City and project proponents with this assessment. Additionally, to ease the financial burden for Valley businesses, the District is currently offering substantial incentive funding that covers the full cost of purchasing , installing, and maintaining the system for up to two years. Please contact the District at (559) 230-5800 or [email protected] for more information. 2) Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement
If the Project is expected to have a significant impact, the District recommends the environmental document also include a discussion on the feasibility of implementing a Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement (VERA) for this Project.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
District Reference No. 20200343
July 16, 2020