Reedley City Council
December 13, 2022

ALL CELL PHONES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES MUST BE

TURNED OFF IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.

TUESDAY, December 13, 2022
Meeting Held in the Council Chambers
845 "G" Street, Reedley, California
www.reedley.ca.gov
The Council Chambers are accessible to the physically disabled. Requests for additional accommodations for the disabled, including auxiliary aids or to request translation services, should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at 637-4200 ext. 212.

Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a Council meeting or hearing, no documents shall be accepted for Council review unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk by the close of business one day prior to said Council meeting/hearing at which the Council will consider the item to which the documents relate, pursuant to the adopted City Council Protocols.

The meeting will be webcast and accessed at: http://www.reedley.com/livestream.php *PLEASE SEE LAST PAGE OF AGENDA FOR ZOOM PARTICIPATION INSTRUCTIONS* Mary L. Fast, Mayor
Anita Betancourt, Mayor Pro Tern
Ray Soleno, Council Member

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
INVOCATION- Pastor Nick Jones, Redeemers Church

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL
Suzanne Byers, Council Member
Matthew Tuttle, Council Member

AGENDA APPROVAL -ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS - COUNCIL ORGANIZATION

1. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-089, A RESOLUTION RECITING THE FACT OF THE

CONSOLIDATED GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF REEDLEY ON THE am DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 AND DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW.

Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

2. PRESENTATION TO OUTGOING COUNCIL MEMBER RAY SOLENO

3. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS MARY

FAST AND SCOTT FRIESEN
A. OATH OF OFFICE TO BE ADMINISTERED BY CITY CLERK
B. SEATING OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
BREAK

4. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION-CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE PER RESOLUTION NO. 2015-004
A. CONFIRMATION OF ACCEPTANCE TO POSITION OF MAYOR BY ANITA BETANCOURT, DISTRICT 5
B. CONFIRMATION OF ACCEPTANCE TO POSITION OF MAYOR PRO
TEMPORE BY MATTHEW TUTTLE, DISTRICT 1

5. CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE'S APPOINTMENT TO FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (COG) POSITIONS PER RESOLUTION 2013- 005
A. COG BOARD MEMBER
B. COG ALTERNATE BOARD MEMBER
PUBLIC COMMENT - Provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items of interest to the public within the Council's jurisdiction and which are not already on the agenda this evening. It is the policy of the Council not to answer questions impromptu. Concerns or complaints will be referred to the City Manager's office. Speakers · should limit their comments to not more than three (3) minutes. No more than ten (10) minutes per issue will be allowed. For items which are on the agenda this evening, members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the Council as each item is brought up for discussion.

NOTICE TO PUBLIC
CONSENT AGENDA items are considered routine and a recommended action for each item is included, and will be voted upon as one item. If a Councilmember has questions, requests additional information, or wishes to comment on an item, the vote should not be taken until after questions have been addressed or comments made, and the public has had an opportunity to comment on the Consent Agenda items. If a Councilmember wishes to have an item considered individually or change the recommended action, then the item should be_removed and acted upon as a separate item. A Councilmember's vote in favor of the Consent Agenda is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. Motions in favor of the Consent Agenda are deemed to include a 2 motion to waive the full reading of any ordinance on the Consent Agenda. For adoption of ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 6-9)

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR AND SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 8, 2022 - (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

7. APPROVE MAYORS NOMINATION OF ABE ISAAK FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE CONSOLIDATED MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT- (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

8. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO RENEW THE ANNUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVID WELLHOUSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,500 FOR PREPARATION AND FILING OF CLAIMS FOR STATE MANDATED COST (SB 90) REIMBURSEMENT-(Administrative Services) Staff Recommendation: Approve

9. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-097 GRANTING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY ENGINEER

OR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ACCEPT AND EXECUTE A MASTER AGREEMENT

AND SUBSEQUENT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR STATE-FUNDED TRANSPORTATION RELATED PROJECTS- (Engineering)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCES - With respect to the approval of ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council Member that the ordinance be read in full, further reading of the ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

10. HOLD PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE ORDINANCE 2022-006 AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9 OF THE REEDLEY CITY CODE RELATING TO BUILDING CODES.- Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Fire Department & Community Development Department) Staff Recommendation: Approve

11. INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 2022-008, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 7 OF THE REEDLEY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TREES - Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Public Works) Staff Recommendation: Approve

12.CONSIDER ACTION RELATED TO ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 20) TO THE CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) WHICH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING:

A. RESOLUTION 2022-098, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF REEDLEY ANNEXING OF TERRITORY TO A COMMUNITY
3 FACILITIES DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX,

AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF TAX TO QUALIFIED ELECTORS, CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 20
B. RESOLUTION 2022-099, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF REEDLEY DECLARING RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ANNEXATION

ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, AND

DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN, CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 20
Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. - (Administrative Services)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS

13.CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

POSITIONS
A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-095 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING REVISED MASTER SALARY TABLES

ADDING THE POLICE SUPPORT SERVICES SUPERVISOR
CLASSIFICATION TO UNREPRESENTED RANGE 54-U
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-096 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF REEDLEY AMENDING THE SALARY AND BENEFIT SCHEDULE

FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES ADDING THE POLICE SUPPORT
SERVICES SUPERVISOR CLASSIFICATION TO THE RECOGNIZED MIDMANAGEMENT POSITIONS C. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZED CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SIDE

LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH THE REEDLEY POLICE OFFICERS
ASSOCIATION REVISING ARTICLE 14 SPECIALTY PAY TO ADD

ASSIGNMENT TO THE FRESNO COUNTY ADULT COMPLIANCE TEAM

AS ELIGIBLE SPECIALTY PAY
Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate. -:-- (Administrative Services & Police Department) Staff Recommendation: Approve

RECEIVE INFORMATION & REPORTS
These items are formal transmittals of information to the Reedley City Council. They are not voted upon by the Reedley City Council. Members of the public who have questions on these items are suggested to call City staff members during regular business hours.

14.REEDLEY AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 14, 2022 - Community Services
4 15. RECEIVE, REVIEW & FILE 2021-22 AUDITED CITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTSAdministrative Services

COUNCIL REPORTS

16.BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.

STAFF REPORTS

17.UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing revised agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 9~ day of December 2022. ~ tfl&u-t 2
F#uthieGreenwood, City Clerk
Zoom Participation:

The City Council is encouraging members of the public to observe and participate in the Council meeting virtually, to maximize the safety of all meeting participants. Reasonable efforts will be made to allow written and verbal comments from participants communicating with the host of the virtual meeting. To do so, participants may "raise their hand" during public comment portions of the meeting using the electronic feature on the zoom program, and the City Clerk will inform the Mayor of the participant's desire to provide public comment. Due to the new, untested format of these meetings, the City cannot guarantee that participants who wish to provide public comment will occur as expected.

The "chat" feature on Zoom will not be monitored or used during the meeting. Members of the public who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at [email protected] by the close of business one day prior to the start of the meeting to ensure that the comments will be available to the City Council. Please indicate the agenda item number to which the comment pertains. Written comments that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the meeting. A copy of any written comment will be provided to the City Council at the meeting. Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting, but will be included with the meeting minutes. 5 DATE: December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
~ Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _......;;...._ I __
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-089, A RESOLUTION RECITING THE FACT

OF THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF REEDLEY ON THE 8th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 AND DECLARING

THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW.

SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood
City Clerk
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-089, reciting the results of the Consolidated General Municipal election held on November 8, 2022 for District 2 and District 4.

BACKGROUND
The Consolidated General Municipal election was held on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of electing the following officers of the City of Reedley as required by the laws related to cities in the State of California, to wit: Two (2) members of the City Council, representing District 2, and District 4 of the City of Reedley for the full term of four (4) years. The official "Certificate of Elections" results indicate that Mary L. Fast (District 2), and Scott Friesen (District 4) have been elected as Members of the City Council of the City of Reedley for a full term of four years.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-089

2. Exhibit A

3. (2) Certificates of Election

4. Certificate of county clerk to results of the canvass RESOLUTION NO. 2022-089

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE

CONSOLIDATED GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN
SAID CITY OF REEDLEY ON THE 8th DAY OF NOVEMBER,
2022, AND DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH
OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW.

WHEREAS, a consolidated general municipal election was held and conducted in the City of Reedley, County of Fresno, State of California, on the 8th day of November, 2022, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of said election was duly and regularly given in time, form, and manner as provided by the law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects said election was held and conducted and the votes cast there as, received, and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form , and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in cities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 703 adopted the 16th day of December, 1986 and Resolution No. 2018-061 adopted on the 12th day of June 2018, the County of Fresno canvassed the returns of said election and has certified the results to this City Council, said results are received, attached, and made a part thereof as Exhibit "A".

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: That the results of the election as shown in Exhibit "A" are hereby approved.

SECTION 2: The said consolidated general municipal election was held for the purpose of electing the following officers of said City as required by the laws relating to cities in the State of California, to wit: Two members of the City Council from Districts 2 and 4 of said City for the full term of four years.

SECTION 3: The City Council does declare and determine that:

From District 2 - Mary L. Fast was elected as a Member of the City Council of said City for the full term of four years; and
From District 4 - Scott Friesen was elected as a Member of the City Council of said City for the full term of four years; and
1 SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of such persons so elected and/or appointed, a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and duly authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to persons elected and/or appointed, the oath of office prescribed in the State Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe thereto and file the same in the City Clerk's office; whereupon, each and all of said persons so elected and/or appointed shall be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected and/or appointed.

The foregoing resolution was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on the 13th day of December, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
2 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 13, 2022
D Consent Calendar
~ Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 3
TITLE: ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS, MARYL. FAST AND SCOTT FRIESEN.

A. OATH OF OFFICE TO BE ADMINISTERED BY CITY CLERK.

B. SEATING OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood kt)
City Clerk
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

NO HANDOUTS
City of Reedley }
County of Fresno }
State of California }
Oath of Office
L Mary L. Fast, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign, and domestic,· that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I will take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

Mary L. Fast
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th day of December, 2022.

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
City of Reedley }
County of Fresno }
State of California }
Oath of Office
L Scott Friesen, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California,· that I will take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion,· and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

Scott Friesen
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th day of December, 2022.

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk'
DATE: December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
[8J Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: '-/-
TITLE: CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION - CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE PER RESOLUTION NO. 2015-004.

A. CONFIRMATION OF ACCEPTANCE TO POSITION OF MAYOR BY
ANITA BETANCOURT, DISTRICT 5.

B. CONFIRMATION OF ACCEPTANCE TO POSITION OF MAYOR PRO
TEMPORE BY MATTHEW TUTTLE, DISTRICT 1.

SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood ~
City Clerk 1</J/
APPROVED:

City
Nicole
Manager
R. Zieba l
l/'1
, L_ ~
V

RECOMMENDATION
No formal vote from the Council is required for this item. The nominee for Mayor must confirm whether he/she will accept the role as Mayor, and the nominee for Mayor Pro Tempore must confirm whether he/she will accept the role as Mayor Pro Tempore.

BACKGROUND
Resolution No. 2015-004 established a policy and procedure for the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore. The policy became effective as of January 27, 2015. Beginning the first meeting of December in every even-number year beginning in 2012, the office of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore automatically rotate and are filled according to Council District number order. In 2020, per resolution, Mary L. Fast (District 2) accepted the Mayor position and Robert Beck (District 3) accepted the Mayor Pro Tempore position. September 27, 2022 with the resignation of Council Member Beck, Anita Betancourt (District 5) became Mayor Pro Tempore.

Should any Council Member decline to serve when it is his or her turn to serve, based on the rotation, then the office of the Mayor or Mayor Pro tempore shall automatically rotate to the next Council Member by Council District number, in rotation.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2015-004
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-004

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

MODIFYING THE POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR THE SELECTION OF

THE MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE AND
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2011-013
WHEREAS, the City Council established a policy and procedure· for the selection and rotation of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore with the adoption of Resolution No. 2011-013 on January 25, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to modify the policy and procedure for appointing members of the City Council to serve as Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, respectively, as established by Resolution No. 2011-013; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt a policy that will be neutral and will rotate the offices of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, automatically, every other year.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Reedley as follows:

1. Except as to Section 2 and 3 of Resolution No. 2011-013 which established the initial Council District Number sequence for determining the rotation, and which sequence the City Council desires to maintain, Resolution No. 2011-013 adopted by the City Council on January 25, 2011, is hereby rescinded and superseded by this resolution.

2. At the first meeting of December in each even-numbered year, the office of Mayor shall automatically rotate to the next successive Council Member in the rotation according to Council District Number order.

3. If the Council Member who is next to serve as Mayor has less than one year of experience as a Council Member for the.City-of Reedley, the rotation shall automatically rotate to the next Council Member by Council District Number in the rotation and the recently elected/appointed Council Member who lacks the one year of experience shall be placed at the end of the rotation.

4. Should any Council Member decline to serve when it is his or her tum to serve, based on the rotation, then the office of Mayor shall automatically rotate to the next Council Member, by Council District Number, in the rotation.

5. When a Council Member's two-year term of service as Mayor has been completed, that Council Member shall be placed at the end of the rotation, except as otherwise designated by the Mayor-elect in accordance with Section 4 of this Resolution.

6. The office of the Mayor Pro Tempore shall also be selected based on Council District Number order, in accordance with the foregoing formula. The Mayor Pro Tempore shall automatically become Mayor following completion of the Mayor's term of service, as outlined above, and the new Mayor Pro Tempore shall become the Council Member next in the rotation.

7. If the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore position becomes vacant at any time during the year of service, the Council Member next in the rotation, by Council District Number order, shall fill the position and serve as Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore for the remainder of the vacant term.

8. Completing the term of Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore on behalf of another Council Member, due to an unexpected vacancy, shall not be considered when determining seniority to serve as the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore in the proper and normal line of succession, nor preclude such Council Member from serving as Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore in his or her own right in the proper and normal line of succession.

The foregoing resolution was approved and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on the 27th day of January, 2015, by the following vote:

A YES: Betancourt, Beck, Fast, Rodriguez, Soleno
NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: None.

ATTEST:
. Plata, City Clerk
DATE:

TITLE:

December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
[8J Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ---S

CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE'S APPOINTMENT

TO FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS POSITONS PER RESOLUTION NO. 2013-005.

A. COG BOARD MEMBER
B. COG ALTERNATE BOARD MEMBER
SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood (6
City Clerk
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba V
City Manager ~

NO HANDOUTS

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 8, 2022
A complete audio record of the minutes is available at www.reedlev.ca.gov The meeting of Reedley City Council called to order by Mayor Fast at 7:04 p.m. on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California.

INVOCATION - Rev. Dr. Jeff Wheeland, Reedley Mennonite Brethren Church

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Betancourt

ROLL CALL
Council Members

Present:

Absent:

Anita Betancourt, Suzanne Byers, Ray Soleno, Matthew Tuttle, Mary Fast None.

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
Council Member Tuttle motioned, Council Member Soleno seconded to accept and approve agenda.

Motion unanimously carried.

PRESENTATION

1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Fire Chief Isaak introduced Jesalyn Harper and Derek Martinez as the new code enforcement officers. Mayor and Council welcomed Ms. Harper and Mr.

Martinez to Reedley.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Dr. Mark Luzania who has a business on G Street expressed his concern regarding the parklets.

CONSENT AGENDA (Items 2-10)
Mayor Fast asked for item 4 to be removed and discussed prior to the vote. Mayor Fast also requested that item 9 be removed from consent and voted on separately.

Mayor Fast said on item 4 she wanted to introduce the three nominations for the airport commission and thank them for their service to the community.

Council Member Soleno moved, Council Member Betancourt seconded to accept, approve and adopt all items listed under the CONSENT AGENDA except for item 9 which Mayor Fast requested to be voted on separately.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 25, 2022 - Approved

3. RECOMMENDATION OF REJECTION OF CLAIM-ALVARADO JR. , PEDRO ANTONIO. -Approved Claim Rejection

4. APPROVE MAYOR' S NOMINATION TO FILL THREE VACANCIES ON AIRPORT COMMISSION - Approved

5. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH LSA

ASSOCIATES TO PERFORM ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AS NEEDED-Approved

6. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE LICENSED TRAINING PROVIDER AGREEMENT WITH THE AMERICAN RED CROSS - Approved
REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 8, 2022

7. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A 60 MONTH COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT WITH POWER BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC FOR EIGHT (8) REPLACEMENT DIGITAL COPIER DEVICES & SUPPORTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE-Approved

8. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS TO FUND THE INTERNSHIPS FOR REEDLEY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WITHIN THE EXP ANDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP):
-Approved
A. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING WITH KINGS CANYON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (KCUSD) B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-090 AMENDING THE 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING $63,000 IN THE GENERAL FUND

9. APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-091 , APPROPRIATING $300 IN THE CITY

COUNCIL BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING CITY PAYMENT AND/OR REIMBURSEMENT FOR FOOD EXPENSES FOR A DISTRICT 1 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING - Removed from consent and voted on separately

10. CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS (A) AND (B) FOR THE REEDLEY ALLEY PA YING 2020 PROJECT:
-Approved
A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-092 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $396,326 B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-093 A WARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BUSH ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF REEDLEY ALLEY PA YING 2020 PROJECT

9. APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-091 , APPROPRIATING $300 IN THE CITY

COUNCIL BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING CITY PAYMENT AND/OR REIMBURSEMENT FOR FOOD EXPENSES FOR A DISTRICT 1 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
City Manager Nicole Zieba explained every year the Reedley Police Department participates in the National Night Out event. The event provides a great opportunity to bring police and neighbors together and promotes neighborhood watch programs. Unfortunately due to the pandemic the event had to be canceled the last several years. This particular neighborhood has been very active in participating in the National Night Out. Council Member Tuttle stated one of the Neighborhood Watch Block Captains that resides in District 1 approached him and asked if a joint event could be hosted with the City of Reedley. Sequoia Safety, Police Department and Fire Department would be bringing out vehicles for display for children to look at and ask questions. The event is scheduled in the evening to accommodate the working parents and encourage them to bring the family out to the event. The residents felt if food was provided it would encourage residents to attend. It would be a pot luck type event with the neighbors providing the side dishes and Council Member Tuttle is asking for reimbursement for up to $300 to cover the cost of the main course. City Manager Nicole Zieba stated this is a bit of a unique situation because traditionally this is something the City would have organized multiple block parties at the same time while participating in National Night Out event. The neighborhood has reached out wanting to have the event which is something the City traditionally participates in.

Mayor Fast said she feels it is good that Council Member Tuttle is having a community meeting, however she struggles with appropriating up to $300 of City funds to cover the costs from the event. Mayor stated if it was a onetime deal then she could understand but did not want to be setting a precedence.

Public Comment:

Butch Agrifoglio stated he is on the airport commission and they host the annual airport fly in event which provides food and encourages the community to come out. He would consider this the same type of community outreach event and would support the idea.
2 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 8, 2022
Council Member Soleno moved Council Member Betancourt seconded APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-091, APPROPRIATING $300 IN THE CITY COUNCIL BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING CITY PAYMENT AND/OR REIMBURSEMENT FOR FOOD EXPENSES FOR A DISTRICT 1

NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Soleno, Betancourt, Byers, Tuttle.

Fast.

None.

None.

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
ORDINANCES- With respect to the approval of ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council Member that the ordinance be read in full, further reading of the ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

11. INTRODUCE AND WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 2022-006, ADOPTION OF 2022

CALIFORNIA BUILDING AND STANDARDS CODE, AND SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 2022-006
Fire Chief Isaak discussed the building and standards code. Chief Isaak stated this is a routine item that is discussed every 3 years. The State of California adopts the new building code standards and the city has until January 1, 2023 to adopt the new building code. Chief Isaak provided an in depth presentation regarding the new building code.

Council Member Betancourt moved Council Member Tuttle seconded INTRODUCE AND WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 2022-006, ADOPTION OF 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING AND STANDARDS CODE, AND SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 2022-006 Motion unanimously carried.

12. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-088 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 ADOPTED BUDGET TO REALLOCATE $100,000 IN CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021 FOR INITIAL

PLANNING & DESIGN WORK ASSOCIATED WITH A FUTURE CITY HALL FACILITY City Manager Nicole Zieba stated the City had originally built the current city hall and police department buildings in the 1960 when the population was roughly 5,600 people. There was a remodel completed in l 990's and the population at that time was at 15,000. Currently the population is about 26,000 people and the police department is bursting at the seams. The police department has brought in a modular until that houses staff but it is only a temporary solution. The City purchased the Royal Valley building which was located behind city hall and had the intention of expanding the police department and city hall. Currently the police department and city hall share the same building. Initially the intention was to build a new police department however it would be difficult because the police department requires a sally port, jail, dispatch facility and evidence processing, compared to city hall which is just office space. It was then decided that it would be easier and more cost effective to build a new city hall and allow the police department to expand in to the existing city hall space.

The plan will be to build a new city hall at the dirt lot where the former Royal Valley building once was.

Council Member Betancourt moved Council Member Byers seconded ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-088 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 ADOPTED BUDGET TO REALLOCATE $100,000 IN

CORONA VIRUS ST A TE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT OF 2021 FOR INITIAL PLANNING & DESIGN WORK ASSOCIATED WITH A FUTURE

CITY HALL FACILITY
Motion unanimously carried.

COUNCIL REPORTS
3 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 8, 2022

13. BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.

Council Member Betancourt
• Attended enrobing ceremony for Fresno Superior Court Judge Council Member Byers
• Mentioned the Senior Thanksgiving luncheon she attended and thanked Community Services Department • Discussed the upcoming Christmas Parade
Council Member Tuttle
• Attended a meeting at Reedley College with Representative Devin Mathis and provided a brief update Mayor Fast
• Also attended the event with Devin Mathis regarding the Reedley College Forestry program • Attended the ribbon cutting ceremony at the Munchies Ice Cream shop • Shared about the Education Employees Credit Union open house event she attended • Attended a Council of Government meeting and provided a brief update

STAFF REPORTS

14. UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

City Manager, Nicole Zieba
• Discussed upcoming meeting in December
• Provided a Fresno County Health Department update
• Mentioned the Kings River clean up event which was attended by Rotary and Fresno Economic Opportunities Commission
Police Chief Garza
• Reminded everyone about the upcoming police department awards ceremony Public Works Director, Russ Robertson
• Shared the results of the most recent Rails to Trails audit • Discussed the Fall Clean up event
City Engineer, Marilu Morales
• Provided an update on a grant that the City applied for Fire Chief Isaak
• Provided an update on the new fire pumper

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Fast adjourned the regular meeting at 8:36 p.m.

Mayor Mary Fast
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
4 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - November 8, 2022
A complete audio record ofthe minutes is available at www.reedley.ca.gov The Special meeting of Reedley City Council called to order by Mayor Fast at 8:36 p.m. on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California.

ROLL CALL
Council Members

Present:

Absent:

Anita Betancourt, Suzanne Byers, Ray Soleno, Matthew Tuttle, Mary Fast None.

PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING AGENDIZED MATTERS ONLY
None.

CONSENT AGENDA

1. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-094 OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF ONE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CYCLE 6 2023 REGIONAL COMPETITIVE ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
City Engineer Marilu Morales explained if the City was awarded the grant it would allow for rails to trails to be expanded on the eastern edge of the Reedley Sports Park.

Council Member Soleno motioned Council Member Tuttle seconded ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-094 OF

THE CITY OF REEDLEY AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF ONE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CYCLE 6 2023 REGIONAL COMPETITIVE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Motion unanimously carried.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Fast adjourned the special meeting at 8:39pm.

Mayor Mary Fast
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
DATE: December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
1:8:1 Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: '7 ----
TITLE: APPROVE MAYOR'S NOMINATION OF ABE ISAAK FOR REAPPOINTMENT

TO THE CONSOLIDATED MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT
SUBMITTED: Ruthie Greenwood
City Clerk
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending the Reedley City Council approve Mayor Fast's nomination to reappoint Abe Isaak to the Consolidated Mosquito Abatement District (District) Board of Trustees (Board).

After review of the application by Mayor Fast, she is recommending reappointment to the commission.

BACKGROUND
Abe Isaak was appointed by the City Council to serve the remaining term of Dan Munk, the City's representative to the District, upon his relocation out of the District. That Trustee position term expires at the end of December, 2022. Mayor Fast has interviewed the applicant and is recommending Abe Isaak to be reappointed to the Board as the City's representative.

The Consolidated Mosquito Abatement District Trustee position term is four (4) year terms. The appointment will have a term expiration of January 2027

FISCAL IMPACT
No Fiscal Impact

ATTACHMENTS
One (1) application

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMISSION/COMMITTEE APPLICATION FORM
I hereby request that I be considered for appointment to the following Commission or Committee:.

PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK

CHECK ONE ONLY- USE SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR EACH COMMISSION •
•
•
•
Airport Commission
tv\o41r~-dt,~ Ab~ Df9r
GoM~unity S&rv100s Cami nissior, i
(Must reside within City limits)
Planning Commission
(Must reside within City limits)
Traffic Safety Commission
(Must reside within City limits) .

Streetscape Maintenance Committee
(Must be a business owner within downtown streetscape
maintenance district)
NAME: Ak I $A~
HOME ADDRESS: ___ _
~tU:; &1 93,:,a
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from above):

HOME PHONE: - DAY PHONE: .

EMAIL ADDRESS (if applicable): ____ _
RESIDENT OF REEDLEY FOR /1: YEARS.

EMPLOYED BY: t?:1_ ri'Jaa/ (}/
DATE: 11 /U./~ 2- SIGNATURE:/42:~
(Additional information is requested on the back of this form) Please give a brief overview of any qualifications you might have that would be beneficial to the Commission you have chosen to serve on. ~; .1-M . --hJ edd ~ ~ h1 A?'j fr £ ~----
J) ~~ .a ,;:±u,m.- C1a-.~ g' ~ 6~ ,I
~ cn-,cF ~ a,..,,? m,,d "cJ ,4d!r~ aa .,/,L ~
d/NIJ AWi
Please note that the Mayor, or his designee, will be contacting you to setup a one-on-one interview.

DATE: December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
1:8J Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D ClosedSession
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _ 6 __
TITLE: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO RENEW THE ANNUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVID WELLHOUSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,500 FOR PREPARATION AND FILING OF CLAIMS FOR STATE MANDATED COST (SB 90) REIMBURSEMENT
SUBMITTED: Amar Bains, Accountant ~
REVIEWED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manager
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manage

RECOMMENDATION
Request Council approval of the attached consulting agreement with David Wellhouse & Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $4,500 for preparation and filing of claims for State mandated cost reimbursements for fiscal year 2021-22.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
State law (SB90) provides for reimbursement of costs incurred by local agencies for various Statemandated laws and requirements, such as procedures related to Domestic Violence Arrests & Victim Assistance and Rape Victims Counseling Center Notices once approved by the Commission on State Mandates as a reimbursable mandate. The remainder of State mandated services that claims will be filed for are detailed in the attached consulting agreement; however, the majority of claims historically submitted by the City have been for mandates under the purview of the Police Department.

The City has historically paid $4,500 to David Wellhouse & Associates for the preparation and filing of SB 90 reimbursement claims on the City's behalf. Claims totaling $31 ,377 were filed last fiscal year. The latest State budget appropriated $68,645,000 for payment of mandates filed through 2021-22, which is over 44% more than the amount appropriated last year. All claims which were submitted for reimbursement last year are again reimbursable this year.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City has historically paid $4,500 for the consultant to prepare and file the annual claims. This amount is paid annually from an offset of prior year SB 90 claims revenue received this fiscal year. Typically, reimbursement revenue from prior year claims is more than sufficient to cover the cost of filing current year claims, resulting in net additional revenue to the General Fund. As an example, last fiscal year (2021-22), the City received $25,106 in reimbursements and paid $4,500 to file new claims, for a net benefit to the General Fund of $20,606. No new appropriations are needed for this Agreement.

The total amount of prior year claims the State owes the City is $490,391 not including the value of the 2021-22 claims that will be filed this year.

ATTACHMENT
Proposal & Consulting Agreement
Mr. Paul Melikian
Assistant City Manager
City of Reedley
845 'G' Street
Reedley, California 93654
• David Wellhouse ... and Associates, lnc.

October 19, 2022
Re: Proposal For February 2023 Annual State Mandated Cost Claiming Services (SB90) Dear Mr. Melikian:

The State Controller's Office has just released the updated claiming instructions for the February 2023 claims. The new mandate, Racial and Identity Profiling, requires Police Departments to begin the collection of data based on the number of employees in the department. For departments with more than 1000 peace officers, the requirement began on April 1, 2019. For departments less than 334 peace officers, the requirement to begin collecting stop data began on January 1, 2022. One-time activities for reimbursement include training of all peace officers and supervisors, as well as, installation and testing of software necessary to comply with the state-mandated requirements for the collection and reporting of data on all applicable stops. Ongoing mandated activities include the annual reporting to DOJ, creating Officer's ID Numbers for each officer, and maintaining a system to match an individual officer required to report stops to his or her Officer's ID number. In addition, all stops shall be documented to include date, time, duration, and location of stop. Perceived race or ethnicity, gender, and reason for stop and actions taken by the Officer during the stop are some of the data recorded during each stop. The Officer's ID Number, as well as the years of experience and type of assignment of the officer, will also be included. Each report is reviewed by a supervisor for accuracy and if needed sent back to the officer for completion before sending the data to the DOJ. It will be necessary to interview the individuals involved from the Police Department to determine the amount of time spent on each activity for this mandate.

The state budget appropriated $68,645,000 for the reimbursement of mandated claims for costs incurred through the 2021/2022 fiscal year. All claims which were submitted for reimbursement last year are again reimbursable this year.
3609 Bradshaw Road, Suite H-382 • Sacramento, California 95827 (916) 797-4883 • FAX (916) 797-4887
This year's state budget continues to suspend the mandates previously suspended in other budget years.

This includes California Public Records Act (CPRA) along with Absentee Ballots, Mandate Reimbursement, and Local Recreational Areas: Background Screenings, as well as the following mandates in the Police and Fire Departments. All other mandates filed last year are still available to file for this claiming period.

Police Department
Animal Adoption - Chapter 752, Statutes of 1998
Identity Theft - Chapter 956, Statutes of 2000
DNA Database - Chapter 467, Statutes of 2001
False Reports of Police Misconduct - Chapter 590, Statutes of 1995 AIDS/Search Warrant, - Chapter 1088, Statutes of 1988
Photographic Record of Evidence - Chapter 875, Statutes of 1985 Stolen Vehicle Notification - Chapter 337, Statutes of 1990 Sex Offenders: Disclosure by Law Enforcement Officers (Megan's Law) Chapter 485, Statutes of 1998 Law Enforcement Sexual Harassment Training - Chapter 126, Statutes of 1993 Elder Abuse Law Enforcement Training - Chapter 444, Statutes of 1997 Sex Crime Confidentiality - Chapter 36, Statues of 1994 Fire Department
Fire Safety Inspections of Care Facilities - Chapter 993, Statutes of 1989 SIDS Training for Firefighters - Chapter 1111, Statutes of 1989 Commission Set Aside Programs
The Commission set aside Parameters and Guidelines for the following programs:

Investment Reports - Chapter 783, Statutes of 1995
Misdemeanors: Booking & Fingerprinting - Chapter 1105, Statutes of 1992 Regional Housing Needs
Two-way Traffic Signal Communication
Due to the suspension of the above mandates in the State Budget Act, they are not funded for the 2021/2022 or 2022/2023 fiscal years. Therefore, the City is no longer required to follow the requirements of the mandates listed above. This is due to Government Code Section 17581 which states that the Legislature may put a O (zero) appropriation in the State Budget for a recognized state mandated program. When this occurs, it makes that statute suspended and optional to the City for that fiscal year. The programs above, which were set aside by the Commission, are also no longer reimbursable.

Costs of Services
David Wellhouse & Associates, Inc. will prepare and file the City of Reedley's February 2023 claims.

These claims are for fiscal years 2021/2022 actual claims for a fixed fee of$ 4,500.00. Our fee for the preparation and filing of the City's February 2023 claims includes all time and expenses necessary to .prepare and file the City's claims. This fixed fee is due upon the submission of claims to the State Controller's Office on or before February 15, 2023.

As in years past, I look forward to working with you and City staff. With the possibility of new City staff, there always will be questions. Should anyone have questions, please have them contact me by telephone or e-mail, even if they feel it is a small issue, I can help explain the details of the process and make their data collection much easier.

Enclosed, please find two copies of the proposed Agreement for the preparation of the City's claims. Please sign both copies and return one copy of the Agreement by December 2, 2022. Please keep the second copy for your files.

Should you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 797-4883. Thank you for your past support and consideration of this proposal.

Sincerely,
/lfa.J1 l/d(k/M)(._
Renee M. Wellhouse
President
Enclosures:

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REEDLEY AND DAVID WELLHOUSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PREPARATION AND FILING OF CLAIMS FOR STATE

MANDATED COST REIMBURSEMENT
This agreement by and between the CITY OF REEDLEY, a municipality of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and DAVID WELLHOUSE & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSUL TANT".

Whereas, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to prepare and file claims for State Mandated Cost Reimbursement, and CONSUL TANT has been selected to perform said services, now, therefore, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows:

1. Claims To Be Filed. CONSUL TANT shall prepare and file with the State Controller's Office on behalf of CITY, the following state mandated cost (SB 90) claims during the 2021-2022 fiscal year.

A. February 2023 Annual Claims for fiscal year 2021-2022 claims to be prepared and filed on or before February 15, 2023 as required by the State Controller's Claiming Instructions.

Racial and Identity Profiling - Chapter 466, Statutes of 2017 Vote by Mail Ballots: Prepaid Postage - Chapter 120 (AB216), Statutes of 2018 Peace Officer Training: Mental Health/Crisis Intervention - Chapter 469, Statutes of 2015
U Visa 918 Form, Victims of Crime: Nonimmigrant Status - Chapter 721.

Statutes of 2015
Local Agency Employee Organizations: Impasse Procedures II - Chapter 314, Statutes of 2012
Domestic Violence Arrests & Victim Assistance -Chapter 698 & 702, Statutes of 1998 Rape Victims Counseling Center Notices - Chapter 999, Statutes of 1991 Domestic Violence Arrest Policies and Standards - Chapter 246, Statutes of 1995.

Threats Against Police Officers - Chapter 1249, Statutes of 1992 Health Benefits for Survivors of Peace Officers and Firefighters - Chapter 1120/96 Peace Officer Procedural Bill of Rights - Chapter 465, Statutes of 1976 Administrative License Suspension - Chapter 1460, Statutes of 1989 Peace Officer Personnel Records - Chapter 7 41, Statutes of 1994 Peace Officer Procedural Bill of Rights II - Chapter 170, Statutes of 2002 Local Government Employee Relations - Chapter 901, Statutes of 2000 Crime Victim's Domestic Violence Incident Reports - Chapter 1022, Statutes of 1999 Pesticide Use Reports - Chapter 1200, Statutes of 1989
State Authorized Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders - Chapter 336, Statutes of 2006
Tuberculosis Control - Chapter 1763, Statutes of 2002
CITY acknowledges that CONSUL TANT does not warrant that claims will be filed for all of the mandates listed in Section 1. CONSULTANT shall only prepare and file claims for those mandates listed in Section 1 in which the CITY has reimbursable costs.

The claims and services described in this Section 1 shall hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT".

CONSUL TANT hereby designates Renee Wellhouse, or other delegated representative, to be sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of services as stated in PROJECT.

2. Time For Performance. CONSULTANT shall file all claims in accordance with the State Controller's claim filing deadline contained in the applicable State Controller Claiming Instructions.

3. Compensation.

A. CITY agrees to pay CONSUL TANT a fixed fee in the amount of $4,500.00 for services provided under Section 1A. of PROJECT, upon receipt of CONSULTANT'S invoice, after submission of claims as required by the State Controller's Claiming Instructions.

4. Method Of Payment. CITY agrees to pay said fixed fees for services provided under Section 1A of PROJECT upon receipt of CONSULTANT'S invoice, after submission of claims as required by the State Controller's Claiming Instructions. City further agrees to pay CONSULTANT'S invoice within 15 days of receipt.

5. City Assistance. CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSUL TANT in the performance of this agreement. CITY shall provide CONSUL TANT with requested information in a timely manner, pursuant to PROJECT. CITY represents and warrants that all financial documents and other information provided are accurate and correct.

CONSUL TANT shall not be liable for claims that are not filed or incorrectly filed due to inaccurate or untimely data.

6. Disposition Of Documents. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY copies of all claims filed with the State within 30 days after filing. CONSUL TANT shall, upon written request, make copies of work papers available to CITY. CITY acknowledges that all such work papers are the property of CONSUL TANT, and may not be disclosed to any third party, provided however that such workpapers may be disclosed to appropriate governmental authorities for audit purposes. CONSUL TANT shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared.

7. Not Obligated To Third Parties. CITY shall not be obligated or liable hereunder to any party other than CONSUL TANT.

8. Insurance. CONSUL TANT shall carry, maintain and keep in full force and effect, a policy of comprehensive general liability and automotive liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 aggregate applying to bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage.

9. Independent Contractor. CONSUL TANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this agreement as an independent contractor. CONSUL TANT shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for, any and all payments of taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees.

10. Consultant Assistance If Audited. Upon notice of audit, CONSULTANT shall make available to CITY and state auditors claim file information, and provide assistance to CITY in defending claims submitted.

11. Consultant Liability If Audited. All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. Any disallowance of claims by the State Controller's Office or other state agencies is the responsibility of CITY.

12. Indirect Costs. CONSUL TANT shall make every effort to prepare departmental Indirect Cost Rate Proposals for claims submitted, provided CITY financial information and departmental costs support such rates. CONSUL TANT may utilize the ten percent (10%) indirect cost rate allowed by the State Controller if financial information and departmental costs do not support a higher rate.

13. Termination Of Agreement. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT'S services hereunder with cause, whether or not services under PROJECT are fully complete. CITY shall do so by giving written notice to CONSULTANT, specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination.

14. Return of Signed Agreement. CONSULTANT shall be under no obligation to prepare and file claims unless the executed Agreement is received by mail or e-mail of the City's intention to continue our services and received by CONSULTANT by December 2, 2022.

CONSUL TANT may extend this deadline on a case by case basis.

15. Entirety. The foregoing set forth the entire Agreement between the parties.

CONSUL TANT:

DAVID WELLHOUSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
a California Corporation
By~ ,f!_ JvlmUWYL
Renee M. Wellhouse
President
CITY:

CITY OF REEDLEY,
a municipality of the State of California
By:

Name:

Title:

Phone: ------------
Date: October 19, 2022
Date: --------
DATE:

TITLE:

December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
[8J Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 9 -----
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-097 GRANTING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY

ENGINEER OR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ACCEPT AND EXECUTE A

MASTER AGREEMENT AND SUBSEQUENT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT

AGREEMENTS FOR STATE-FUNDED TRANSPORTATION RELATED

PROJECTS
SUBMITTED: Marilu S. Morales, P.E~_,l)
City Engineer
APPROVED:

City
Nicole
Manager
Zieba
~
~

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-097 granting authority to the City Engineer or Public Works Director to accept and execute Master Agreement No. 06-5216S21 administering Agency-State Agreement for State-Funded Projects and all subsequent Program Supplement Agreements for State Funded transportation related projects.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In March 2021, the City of Reedley was awarded an Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 grant through the Fresno Council of Government (FCOG) Regional ATP Cycle 5 Competitive Bid for the Jefferson Safe Routes to Schools Project (Project). The Project was authorized by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and was programmed to receive State Funding only through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).

Caltrans is responsible for administering grants that receive State and Federal funding. Caltrans requires cities to enter into a master agreement that provides requirements regarding project administration, maintenance and management of projects after completion, fiscal provisions, record retention and reports, and miscellaneous provisions. In 1997, the City of Reedley entered into Master Agreement No. 06-5216 with Caltrans for Federal-Aid Projects that allows the City to receive Federal Funding on various projects. Caltrans also requires that the City execute a supplemental agreement for each phase of State and Federally Funded projects. The phases typically include preliminary engineering, right of way acquisition and construction. In October 2000, Council passed Resolution No. 2000-083 authorizing the City Engineer to accept and execute program supplement agreements for Federally Funded projects to ensure timely execution of the agreements and to prevent the loss of federal funding on projects. In addition,

Caltrans requested revisions to Master Agreement No. 06-5216 and Council approved Resolution No. 2007-013 authorizing the Public Works Director or the City Engineer to accept and execute the revised Master Agreement No. 06-5216R and program supplement agreements with Caltrans.

The City has not previously had a project receive State Funding only through Caltrans, therefore, Caltrans is requesting that the City enter into Agreement No. 06-5216S21 for State Funded Projects. Resolution No. 2022-097 would allow the City Engineer or Public Works Director to execute the Master Agreement for State Funded projects and program supplement agreements with Caltrans. Approval of the Resolution will ensure reimbursement for the Project as well as any future projects that are only State Funded and will allow timely execution of the agreements.

FISCAL IMPACT
Failure to execute and return the Master Agreement will result in the loss of State Funding for the Project and will prevent Caltrans from processing any reimbursement invoices on this Project or any future State-Funded projects.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-097

2. Copy of Master Agreement No. 06-5216S21

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-097

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER AND/OR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

TO ACCEPT AND EXECUTE A MASTER AGREEMENT ADMINISTERING

AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE-FUNDED PROJECTS AND

PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH CAL TRANS
WHEREAS, the State of California makes funds available for local transportation related projects and said funds are administered by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans); and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022 the City Council approved and entered into Master Agreement Administering Agency-State Agreement for State-Funded Projects No. 06-5216S21 with the State; and
WHEREAS, prior to receiving reimbursement of said transportation funds the City is required to enter into a Master Agreement incorporating various guidelines, regulations and policies and then the City must execute a Program Supplement Agreement to the Master Agreement for each individual project and project phases; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Reedley, using their independent judgment, hereby approves Resolution No. 2022-097 based on the following:

1. The above recitals are true and correct;

2. That the City Council hereby authorizes the City Engineer and/or the Public Works Director to accept and execute the Master Agreement and all Program Supplement Agreements to the Master Agreement issued for current and future State-Funded Transportation Projects funded by the State of California.

3. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This forgoing resolution is hereby approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk

MASTER AGREEMENT

ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR

STATE-FUNDED PROJECTS
06 City of Reedley
District Administering Agency
Agreement No. 06-5216S21
This AGREEMENT, is entered into effective this ___ day of _____ , 20_, by and between the City of Reedley, hereinafter referred to as "ADMINISTERING AGENCY," and the State of California, acting by and through its Department of Transportation (Caltrans ), hereinafter referred to as "STATE", and together referred to as "PARTIES" or individually as a "PARTY."
RECITALS:

1. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted legislation by which certain State funds are made available for use on local transportation related projects of public entities qualified to act as recipients of these state funds; and

2. WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has applied to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and/or STATE for funding from a State-funded program (herein referred to as STATE FUNDS), as defined in the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) and/or in the respective CTC Guidelines, for use on local authorized transportation related projects as a local administered project(s), hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and

3. WHEREAS, said PROJECT will not receive any federal funds; and

4. WHEREAS, before STATE FUNDS will be made available for PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement to establish terms and conditions applicable to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY when receiving STATE FUNDS for a designated PROJECT facility and to the subsequent operation and maintenance of that completed facility.

NOW, THEREFORE, the PARTIES agree as follows:

ARTICLE I - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

1. This AGREEMENT shall have no force or effect with respect to any program project unless and until a project- specific Program Supplement to this AGREEMENT for state funded projects, hereinafter referred to as "PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT", has been fully executed by both STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

2. The State approved project-specific allocation notification letter and approved CTC allocation documentation designate the party responsible for implementing PROJECT, type of work, and location of PROJECT for projects requiring CTC allocation by PROJECT component of work.

3. The PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT sets out special covenants as a condition for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to receive STATE FUNDS from/through STATE for designated PROJECT. The PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall also show these STATE FUNDS that have been initially encumbered for PROJECT along with the matching funds to be provided by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and/or others. Execution of PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT by the PARTIES shall cause ADMINISTERING AGENCY to adopt all the terms of this AGREEMENT as though fully set forth therein in the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. Unless otherwise expressly delegated in a resolution by the governing body of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, and with written concurrence by STATE, the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall be approved and managed by the governing body of ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to execute and return each project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. The PARTIES agree that STATE may suspend future allocations, encumbrances and invoice payments for any on- going or future STATE FUNDED PROJECT performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if any project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is not returned, unless otherwise agreed by STATE in writing.

5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY further agrees, as a condition to the release and payment of STATE FUNDS encumbered for the PROJECT described in each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, to comply with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and all the agreed-upon Special Covenants or Remarks incorporated within the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, and Cooperative/Contribution Agreement where appropriate, defining and identifying the nature of the specific PROJECT.

6. STATE FUNDS will not participate in any portion of PROJECT work performed in advance of the effective date of allocation by CTC, or by ST A TE for allocations delegated to ST A TE by CTC, for said PROJECT.

7. Projects allocated with STATE FUNDS will be administered in accordance with the current CTC STIP Guidelines, applicable chapter(s) of the LAPG, LAPM and/or any other instructions published by STATE.

8. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to ensure compliance with all relevant State laws and requirements for work related to PROJECT, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

9. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's eligible costs for preliminary engineering work includes all preliminary work directly related to PROJECT up to contract award for construction, including, but not limited to, environmental studies and permits (E&P), preliminary surveys and reports, laboratory work, soil investigations, the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), advertising for bids, awarding of a contract and project development contract administration.

10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's eligible costs for construction engineering include actual inspection and supervision of PROJECT construction work; construction staking; laboratory and field testing; and the preparation and processing of field reports, records, estimates, final reports, and allowable expenses of employees/consultants engaged in such activities.

11. Unless the PARTIES agree otherwise in writing, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's employees or its contracted engineering consultant shall be responsible for all PROJECT engineering work.

12. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not proceed with final design of PROJECT until final environmental approval of PROJECT. Final design entails the design work necessary to complete the PS&E and other work necessary for a construction contract but not required earlier for environmental clearance of that PROJECT.

13. If PROJECT is not on STATE-owned right-of-way, PROJECT shall be constructed in accordance with Chapter 11 of the LAPM that describes minimum statewide design standards for local agency streets and roads. The design standards for projects off the National Highway System (NHS) allow STATE to accept either the current Caltrans Highway Design Manual standards, the current FHWA-adopted American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets standards, or the approved geometric design standards of ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

Additionally, for projects off the NHS, STATE will accept ADMINISTERING AGENCY-approved standard specifications, standard plans, materials sampling and testing quality assurance programs that meet the conditions described in the then current Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

14. If PROJECT involves work within or partially within STATE-owned right-of-way, that PROJECT shall also be subject to compliance with the policies, procedures and standards of the STA TE Project Development Procedures Manual and Highway Design Manual and where appropriate, an executed cooperative agreement between STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY that outlines the PROJECT responsibilities and respective obligations of the PARTIES. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its contractors shall each obtain an encroachment permit through STATE prior to commencing any work within STATE rights-of-way or work which affects STATE facilities.

15. When PROJECT is not on the State Highway System (SHS) but includes work to be performed by a railroad, the contract for such work shall be prepared by ADMINISTERING AGENCY or by STATE, as the PARTIES may hereafter agree. In either event, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall enter into an agreement with the railroad providing for future maintenance of protective devices or other facilities installed under the contract.

16. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with the provisions of sections 4450 and 4454 of the California Government Code, as well as other Department of General Services guidance, if applicable, for the contract PS&E for the construction of buildings, structures, sidewalks, curbs and related facilities for accessibility and usability. Further requirements and guidance are provided in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

17. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall provide a full-time public employee to be in responsible charge of each PROJECT. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall provide or arrange for adequate supervision and inspection of each PROJECT. ADMINISTERING AGENCY may utilize consultants to perform supervision and inspection work for PROJECT with a fully qualified and licensed engineer. Utilization of consultants does not relieve ADMINISTERING AGENCY of its obligation to provide a full-time public employee to be in responsible charge of each PROJECT.

18. Unless otherwise provided in the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall advertise, award, and administer the PROJECT construction contract or contracts.

19. The cost of maintenance, security, or protection performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY or contractor forces during any temporary suspension of PROJECT or at any other time may not be charged to the PROJECT.

20. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit PROJECT-specific award information to STATE's District Local Assistance Engineer, within sixty (60) days after contract award.

21. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Final Project Expenditure Report", LAPM Exhibit 17-M, within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Final Project Expenditure Report", within 180 days of project completion will result in ST A TE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

22. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA.

23. The Governor and the Legislature of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdictions, have prescribed certain nondiscrimination requirements with respect to contract and other work financed with public funds. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the requirements of the FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDENDUM, attached hereto as Exhibit A and further agrees that any agreement entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY with a third party for performance of work connected with PROJECT shall incorporate Exhibit A (with third party's name replacing ADMINISTERING AGENCY) as parts of such agreement.

24. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall include in all contracts and subcontracts awarded when applicable, a clause that requires each subcontractor to comply with California Labor Code requirements that all workers employed on public works aspects of any project (as defined in California Labor Code sections 1720-1815) be paid not less than the general prevailing wage rates predetermined by the Department of Industrial Relations as effective at the date of contract award by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

ARTICLE II - RIGHTS-OF-WAY

1. No contract for the construction of a STATE FUNDED PROJECT shall be awarded until all necessary rights of way have been secured. Prior to the advertising for construction of PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall certify and, upon request, shall furnish STATE with evidence that all necessary rights-of-way are available for construction purposes or will be available by the time of award of the construction contract.

2. The furnishing of rights of way by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as provided for herein includes, and is limited to, the following, unless the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT provides otherwise.
(a) Expenditures of capital and support to purchase all real property required for PROJECT free and clear of liens, conflicting easements, obstructions and encumbrances, after crediting PROJECT with the fair market value of any excess property retained and not disposed of by ADMINISTERING AGENCY.
(b) The cost of furnishing of right-of-way as provided for herein includes, in addition to real property required for the PROJECT, title free and clear of obstructions and encumbrances affecting PROJECT and the payment, as required by applicable law, of damages to owners of remainder real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by PROJECT. (c) The cost of relocation payments and services provided to owners and occupants pursuant to Government Code sections 7260-7277 when PROJECT displaces an individual, family, business, farm operation or nonprofit organization.
(d) The cost of demolition and/or the sale of all improvements on the right-of-way after credit is recorded for sale proceeds used to offset PROJECT costs. ( e) The cost of all unavoidable utility relocation, protection or removal.

(f) The cost of all necessary hazardous material and hazardous waste treatment, encapsulation or removal and protective storage for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY accepts responsibility and where the actual generator cannot be identified, and recovery made.

3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability that may result in the event the right-of-way for a PROJECT is not clear as certified by ADMINISTERING AGENCY, including, but not limited to, if said right-of-way is found to contain hazardous materials requiring treatment or removal to remediate in accordance with Federal and State laws. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall pay, from its own non- matching funds, any costs which arise out of delays to the construction of PROJECT because utility facilities have not been timely removed or relocated, or because rights-of-way were not available to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the orderly prosecution of PROJECT work.

ARTICLE Ill - MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT

1. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, constructed, rehabilitated, or restored by PROJECT for its intended public use until such time as the parties might amend this AGREEMENT to otherwise provide. With the approval of STATE, ADMINISTERING AGENCY or its successors in interest in the PROJECT property may transfer this obligation and responsibility to maintain and operate PROJECT property for that intended public purpose to another public entity.

2. Upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY's acceptance of the completed construction contract or upon contractor being relieved of the responsibility for maintaining and protecting PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be responsible for the maintenance, ownership, liability, and the expense thereof, for PROJECT in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of STATE and if PROJECT falls within the jurisdictional limits of another Agency or Agencies, it is the duty of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to facilitate a separate maintenance agreement(s) between itself and the other jurisdictional Agency or Agencies providing for the operation, maintenance, ownership and liability of PROJECT. Until those agreements are executed, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be responsible for all PROJECT operations, maintenance, ownership and liability in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of ST A TE. If, within ninety (90) days after receipt of notice from STATE that a PROJECT, or any portion thereof, is not being properly operated and maintained and ADMINISTERING AGENCY has not satisfactorily remedied the conditions complained of, the approval of future STATE FUNDED PROJECTS of ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be withheld until the PROJECT shall have been put in a condition of operation and maintenance satisfactory to STATE. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a PROJECT that has been vacated through due process of law with STATE's concurrence.

3. PROJECT and its facilities shall be maintained by an adequate and well-trained staff of engineers and/or such other professionals and technicians as PROJECT reasonably requires.

Said operations and maintenance staff may be employees of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, another unit of government, or a contractor under agreement with ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

All maintenance will be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the complete PROJECT improvements.

4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with all applicable law, including but not limited to, all applicable legal authority regarding construction standards.

ARTICLE IV - FISCAL PROVISIONS

1. All contractual obligations of STATE are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the CTC.

2. STATE'S financial commitment of STATE FUNDS will occur only upon the execution of this AGREEMENT, the execution of each project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or ST AT E's approved finance letter.

3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices in arrears for reimbursement of allowable PROJECT costs at least once every six months commencing after the STATE FUNDS are encumbered on either the project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or through a project-specific finance letter approved by STATE. STATE reserves the right to suspend future allocations and invoice payments for any on-going or future STATE FUNDED project performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period

4. Invoices shall be submitted on a standardized billing summary template, in accordance with Chapter 5 of the LAPM to claim reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. For construction invoices, pay estimates must be included.

5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY must retain at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for allowable costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit supporting backup documentation with invoices if requested by State. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs.

6. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY can only be released by STATE as reimbursements of actual allowable PROJECT costs already incurred and paid for by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

7. Indirect Cost Allocation Plans/Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICAP/ICRP), Central Service Cost Allocation Plans and related documentation are to be prepared and provided to the Inspector General - Independent Office of Audits and Investigations for review and approval prior to ADMINISTERING AGENCY seeking reimbursement of indirect cost incurred within each fiscal year being claimed for reimbursement. ICAPs/lCRPs must be prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, Chapter 5 of the LAPM , and the ICAP/ICRP approval procedures established by STATE.

8. ST A TE will withhold the greater of either two (2) percent of the total of all ST A TE FUN OS encumbered for each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or $40,000 until ADMINISTERING AGENCY submits the Final Report of Expenditures for each completed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT PROJECT.

9. The estimated total cost of PROJECT, the amount of STATE FUNDS obligated, and the required matching funds may be adjusted by mutual consent of the PARTIES with a finance letter, and an allocation notification letter when applicable. STATE FUNDING may be increased to cover PROJECT cost increases only if such additional funds are available and the CTC and/or ST ATE concurs with that increase in the form of an allocation and finance letter.

10. When such additional STATE FUNDS are not available, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that any increases in PROJECT costs must be defrayed with ADMINISTERING AGENCY's own funds.

11. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall use its own non-STATE FUNDS to finance the local share of eligible costs and all PROJECT expenditures or contract items ruled ineligible for financing with STATE FUNDS. STATE shall make the final determination of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's cost eligibility for STATE FUNDED financing with respect to claimed PROJECT costs.

12. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse STATE for STATE's share of costs for work performed by STATE at the request of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. STATE's costs shall include overhead assessments in accordance with section 8755.1 of the State Administrative Manual.

13. STATE FUNDS allocated by the CTC and/or STATE are subject to the timely use of funds provisions approved in CTC Guidelines and State procedures approved by the CTC and STATE.

14. STATE FUNDS encumbered for PROJECT are available for liquidation only for a limited period from the beginning of the State fiscal year when those funds were appropriated in the State Budget. STATE FUNDS not liquidated within these periods will be reverted unless a Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA) is submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance in accordance with Section 16304 of the Government Code. The exact date of fund reversion will be reflected in the STATE signed PROJECT finance letter.

15. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROJECT-related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid to rank and file STATE employees under current California Department of Human Resources (CalHR) rules unless a Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA) is submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance in accordance with Government Code section 16304. If the rates invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY are in excess

of CalHR rates, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference, and any overpayments inadvertently paid by STATE shall be reimbursed to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on demand.

16. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with California Government Code 4525- 4529.14. Administering Agency shall undertake the procedures described in California Government Code 4527(a) and 4528(a). Administering Agency shall also comply with 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards, excluding 2 CFR Part 200.318-200.326.

17. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree that Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items. Every recipient and sub-recipient receiving PROJECT funds under this AGREEMENT shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards, excluding 2 CFR Part 200.318-200.326Governments.

ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the provisions set forth in 23 CFR Parts 140, 645 and 646 when contracting with railroad and utility companies.

18. Every recipient and sub-recipient receiving PROJECT funds under this AGREEMENT shall comply with 2 CFR 200 excluding 2 CFR Part 200.318-200.326, 48 CFR Chapter 1, Part 31, LAPM, Public Contract Code (PCC) 10300- 10334 (procurement of goods), PCC 10335-10381 (non-A&E services), California Government Code 4525-4529.5 including 4527(a) and 4528(a), and other applicable ST ATE regulations.

19. Any PROJECT costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be questioned, disallowed, or unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, 23 CFR Parts 140, 645 and 646, LAPM, Public Contract Code (PCC) 10300-10334 (procurement of goods), PCC 10335-10381 (non-A&E services), California Government Code 4525-4529.5 including 4527(a) and 4528(a), and other applicable STATE regulations are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE and may result in STATE imposing sanctions on ADMINISTERING AGENCY as described in Chapter 20 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

20. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY fail to refund any moneys due upon written demand by STATE as provided herein or should ADMINISTERING AGENCY breach this AGREEMENT by failing to complete PROJECT without adequate justification and approval by STATE, then, within thirty (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed to in writing between the PARTIES hereto, STATE, acting through the State Controller, the State Treasurer, the CTC or any other public entity or agency, may intercept, withhold and demand the transfer of an amount equal to the amount paid by or owed to STATE for each PROJECT, from future apportionments, or any other funds due ADMINISTERING AGENCY from the Highway Users Tax Fund or any other sources of funds, and/or may also withhold approval of future STATE FUNDED projects proposed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

21. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY be declared to be in breach of this AGREEMENT or otherwise in default thereof by STATE, and if ADMINISTERING AGENCY is

constituted as a joint powers authority, special district, or any other public entity not directly receiving funds through the State Controller, ST A TE is authorized to obtain reimbursement from whatever sources of funding are available, including the withholding or transfer of funds, from those constituent entities comprising a joint powers authority or by bringing of an action against ADMINISTERING AGENCY or its constituent member entities, to recover all funds provided by ST ATE hereunder.

22. ADMINISTERING AGENCY acknowledges that the signatory party represents the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and further warrants that there is nothing within a Joint Powers Agreement, by which ADMINISTERING AGENCY was created, if any exists, that would restrict or otherwise limit STATE's ability to recover STATE FUNDS improperly spent by ADMINISTERING AGENCY in contravention of the terms of this AGREEMENT.

ARTICLE V

AUDITS, THIRD PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS

1. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT work and records and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with ST A TE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by paragraph three (3) of Article V.

2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain a financial management system and records that properly accumulate and segregate reasonable, allowable, and allocable incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The financial management system of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices sent to or paid by STATE.

3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit by STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States, all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts, and ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested. All of the above-referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT and PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire PROJECT period and for three (3) years, or 35 years for Prop 1 B funds, from the date of final payment to ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a construction contract over $25,000 on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed under this AGREEMENT without the prior written approval of STATE. All contracts awarded by ADMINISTERING AGENCY intended or used as local match credit must meet the requirements set forth in this AGREEMENT regarding local match funds.

5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 4525) Division 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code and shall undertake the procedures described in California Government Code 4527(a) and 4528(a). Administering Agency shall comply with Chapter 10 of the LAPM for A&E Consultant Contracts.

6. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with Government Code Division 5 Title 1 sections 4525-4529.5 and shall undertake the procedures described in California Government Code 4527(a) and 4528(a) for procurement of professional service contracts. Administering Agency shall follow Public Contract Code Section 10335-10381 for other professional service contracts.

7. Any subcontract entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain all of the provisions of Article IV, FISCAL PROVISIONS, and this ARTICLE V, AUDITS, THIRD-PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS and shall mandate that travel and per diem reimbursements and third- party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as PROJECT costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors.

8. To be eligible for local match credit, ADMINISTERING AGENCY must ensure that local match funds used for a PROJECT meet the fiscal provisions requirements outlined in ARTICLE IV in the same manner that is required of all other PROJECT expenditures.

9. Except as provided in this Article, this AGREEMENT is solely between and for the benefit of the PARTIES and there are no third-party beneficiaries.

ARTICLE VI - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

1. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to use all PROJECT funds reimbursed hereunder only for transportation purposes that are in conformance with Article XIX of the California State Constitution and other California laws.

2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations, and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines and Local Assistance Procedures Manual as published by STATE and incorporated herein, including all subsequent approved revisions thereto applicable to PROJECT unless otherwise designated in the project-specific executed PROJECT SUPPLEMENT.

3. This AGREEMENT is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by the State Legislature or adopted by the CTC that may affect the provisions, terms, or funding of this AGREEMENT in any manner.

4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the officers and employees of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, when engaged in the performance of this AGREEMENT, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of STATE.

5. Each project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall separately establish the terms and funding limits for each described PROJECT funded under this AGREEMENT and that PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. No STATE FUNDS are obligated against this AGREEMENT.

6. ADMINISTERING AGENCY certifies that neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor its principals are suspended or debarred at the time of the execution of this AGREEMENT, and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will notify STATE immediately in the event a suspension or a debarment occurs after the execution of this AGREEMENT.

7. ADMINISTERING AGENCY certifies, by execution of this AGREEMENT, that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE has the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability, pay only for the value of the PROJECT work actually performed, or in STATE's discretion, to deduct from the price of PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.

8. In accordance with Public Contract Code section 10296, ADMINISTERING AGENCY hereby certifies under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against ADMINISTERING AGENCY within the immediate preceding two (2) year period because of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's failure to comply with an order of a federal court that orders ADMINISTERING AGENCY to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board.

9. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with STATE that may have an impact upon the outcome of this AGREEMENT or any individual PROJECT encompassed within a PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall also list current contractors who may have a financial interest in the outcome of a PROJECT undertaken pursuant to this AGREEMENT. These disclosures shall be delivered to STATE in a form deemed acceptable by the STATE prior to execution of this AGREEMENT.

10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY hereby certifies that it does not have, nor shall it acquire, any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of any PROJECT initiated under this AGREEMENT.

11. ADMINISTERING AGENCY certifies that this AGREEMENT was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks or other unlawful consideration either promised or paid to any STATE employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to terminate this AGREEMENT without liability, to pay only for PROJECT work actually performed, or to deduct from a PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT price or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback, or other unlawful consideration.

12. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the ST ATE's Contract Manager, who shall be identified to ADMINISTERING AGENCY at the time of execution of this AGREEMENT and, as applicable , any time that Contract Manager changes during the duration of this AGREEMENT who may consider any written or verbal evidence submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

The decision of the Contract Manager, issued in writing, shall be conclusive and binding on the PARTIES on all questions of fact considered and determined by the Contract Manager.

13. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by the Contract Manager will excuse the ADMINISTERING AGENCY from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT and each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT.

14. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction of ADMINISTERING AGENCY arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims and suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this AGREEMENT.

15. Neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ST ATE under this AGREEMENT.

16. In the event of (a) ADMINISTERING AGENCY failing to timely proceed with effective PROJECT work in accordance with the project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT; (b) failing to maintain any applicable bonding requirements; and (c) otherwise materially violating the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and/or any PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, STATE reserves the right to terminate funding for that PROJECT upon thirty (30) days' written notice to ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

17. No termination notice shall become effective if, within thirty (30) days after receipt of a Notice of Termination, ADMINISTERING AGENCY either cures the default involved or, if the default is not reasonably susceptible of cure within said thirty (30) day period the ADMINISTERING AGENCY proceeds thereafter to complete that cure in a manner and time line acceptable to STATE.

18. Any such termination shall be accomplished by delivery to ADMINISTERING AGENCY of a Notice of Termination, which notice shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days after receipt, specifying the reason for the termination, the

extent to which funding of work under this AGREEMENT and the applicable PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is terminated and the date upon which such termination becomes effective, if beyond thirty (30) days after receipt. During the period before the effective termination date, ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE shall meet to attempt to resolve any dispute. In the event of such termination, STATE may proceed with the PROJECT work in a manner deemed proper by STATE. If STATE terminates funding for PROJECT with ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the reasons stated in paragraph sixteen (16) of ARTICLE VI, STATE shall pay ADMINISTERING AGENCY the sum due ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or STATE-approved finance letter prior to termination, provided, however, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is not in default of the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT or the project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and that the cost of any PROJECT completion to STATE shall first be deducted from any sum due ADMINISTERING AGENCY.

19. In the case of inconsistency or conflicts with the terms of this AGREEMENT and that of a project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or Cooperative Agreement, the terms stated in that PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or Cooperative Agreement shall prevail over those in this AGREEMENT.

20. Without the written consent of STATE, this AGREEMENT is not assignable by ADMINISTERING AGENCY either in whole or in part.

21. No alteration or variation of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the PARTIES, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the PARTIES.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this AGREEMENT by their duly authorized officer.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By ___________ _
Chief, Office of Project Implementation
Division of Local Assistance
Date ------------

City of Reedley
By ___________ _
City of Reedley
Representative Name & Title
(Authorized Governing Body Representative)
Date ------------
of 16

EXHIBIT A - FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDENDUM

1. In the performance of this Agreement, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will not discriminate against any employee for employment on account of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
employment; upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees for employment, notices to be provided by ST A TE setting forth the provisions of this Fair Employment section.

2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractor(s) and all subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, 12900 et seq.), and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., Title 2, 11000, et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code section 12900(a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this AGREEMENT by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Each of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and all subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreements, as appropriate.

3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all contracts and subcontracts to perform work under this AGREEMENT.

4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will permit access to the records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data and records by STATE, the State Fair Employment and Housing Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by STATE, for the purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment section of this Agreement.

5. Remedies for Willful Violation:
(a) STATE may determine a willful violation of the Fair Employment provision to have occurred upon receipt of a final judgment to that effect from a court in an action to which ADMINISTERING AGENCY was a party, or upon receipt of a written notice from the Fair Employment and Housing Commission that it has investigated and determined that ADMINISTERING AGENCY has violated the Fair Employment Practices Act.

(b) For willful violation of this Fair Employment Provision, STATE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by STATE in securing the goods or services thereunder shall be borne and paid for by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and by the surety under the performance bond, if any, and STATE may deduct from any moneys due or thereafter may become due to ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the difference between the price named in the Agreement and the actual cost thereof to STATE to cure ADMINISTERING AGENCY's breach of this Agreement.

DATE: December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
~ Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ID
TITLE: HOLD PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE ORDINANCE 2022-006 AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9 OF THE REEDLEY CITY CODE RELATING TO BUILDING CODES.

SUBMITTED: Jerry Isaak, Fire Chief~
Reedley Fire Departmlp---
Jeremy Harrison, Building Offici
Community Development De rtment
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2022-006, amending Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Reedley City Code relating to building codes.

BACKGROUND
The last update to the City's Building Codes was conducted in December of 2019 when the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2019-008 amending Chapter 1 of Title 9 as it relates to adoption of codes. This action adopted the 2019 Building Standards Code.

As an operating practice, every three years (during its triennial cycle) the California Building Standards Commission (BSC) reviews the newest model codes published by various independent code-developing bodies. On July .1, 2022, the State adopted the 2022 California Building Standards Code, which will become effective on January 1, 2023. The 2022 California Building Standards Code includes the following;
Title 24, California Code of Regulations;
o Part 1 - California Administrative Code
o Part 2 - California Building Code
o Part 2.5 - California Residential Building Code
o Part 3 - California Electrical Code
o Part 4 - California Mechanical Code
o Part 5 - California Plumbing Code
o Part 6 - California Energy Code
o Part 8 - California Historical Building Code
o Part 9 - California Fire Code
o Part 10 - California Existing Building Code
o Part 11 - California Green Building Standards Code
o Part 12 - California Reference Standards Code
As a result of the Building Standards Commission's action, each city and county agency may adopt this new code with local amendments by January 1, 2023. If no local action is taken by this date, then the State's Code in its entirety is applicable to the agency when processing building and grading permit applications.

This ordinance was introduced and given first reading by title only at a regular meeting of the City Council on November 08, 2022. This is the second reading of this ordinance. Council approval is necessary to adopt the 2022 California Building Standards Code along with local amendments.

Following legal procedure, a pre-adoption summary notice of the Ordinance was published in the November 24th edition of the local Mid-Valley Times newspaper and announced tonight's hearing date.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact is minimal and will be absorbed within the current budget.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance 2022-006
Motion: -----
Second: -----
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-006

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADOPTING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE AND AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9 OF THE REEDLEY CITY CODE

RELATING TO THE BUILDING CODES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: The City Council is informed and finds that pursuant to the Health and Safety Code, Sections 17958. 7 and 18941 .5, it is reasonably necessary to adopt and amend the requirements of the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code to properly protect the health, safety and welfare of the existing and future residents and workers within the City, and that these amendments are justified by particular climatic conditions that include, but are not limited by the following findings:

1.1 CLIMATIC - EXTREME TEMPERA TURES

1.1.1 The region is subject to relatively low amounts of precipitation, very low humidity levels and extremely high temperatures. These climatic conditions are conducive to the spread of fire. Attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by reference is historical data compiled by the National Weather Service documenting temperatures experienced· in Fresno and the greater area which includes Reedley for the months of May through October, and data from the Western Regional Climatic Center documenting humidity. The temperature data shows that during the months of June, July, August and September, the daily high temperature has averaged in excess of 90 degrees, and temperatures often exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit. During the same months humidity is usually less than 40%, and humidity measurements near 20% are not uncommon. These conditions contribute to an increased likelihood of fire. Moreover, minor fires have a greater tendency of spreading rapidly due to such conditions.

1.1.2 The Heat Stress Index published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in its publication entitled Emergency Incident Rehabilitation sets forth the stress placed on the human body when exposed to various temperatures and humidity's. This Heat Stress Index is attached as Exhibit 2 and incorporated by reference. A note under the Heat Stress Index Chart states that 10 degrees should be added to the temperature when protective clothing is worn and an additional 10 degrees should be added when standing in direct sunlight. According to this chart, a person exposed to temperatures between 90 and 105 degrees is subject to heat cramps and heat exhaustion.

1.1.3 Because of the extreme heat Reedley experiences during the summer months, Reedley Firefighters responding to fires and other incidents are regularly exposed to temperatures in excess of 105 degrees, when accounting for their protective gear, exposing them to the probability of heat cramps, heat exhaustion and possibly heat stroke.

SECTION 2. Section 9-1-1 of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Reedley City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"9-1-1: ADOPTION OF CODES: Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 50022.2, the City Council does hereby adopt by specific reference thereto and incorporation herein by said reference, the provisions, rules and regulations specified and set forth in the following codes, subject to the amendments, if any, set forth in section 9-1-2 of this chapter:

Administrative code
Building code
California Residential
Building code
Electrical code
Mechanical code
California Administrative Code, 2022 edition,
including appendices thereto, as published by the
California Building Standards Commission;
California Building Code, 2022 edition, including
appendices as follows, as published by the California
Building Standards Commission
o Appendix C: Group U - Agricultural
Buildings
o Appendix F: Rodent proofing
o Appendix G: Flood-Resistant Construction
o Appendix H: Signs
o Appendix I: Patio Covers
o Appendix J: Grading
o Appendix K: Flood Protection Plan;
California Residential Building Code Part 2.5, 2022
edition, including appendices as follows, as
published by the California Building Standards
Commission:
o Appendix G: Swimming Pools
o Appendix H: Patio Covers
o DELETE Section 1.8.8 Appeals Board;
California Electrical code, 2022 edition, including
appendices thereto, as published by the California
Building Standards Commission:
o DELETE Section 89.108.8 Appeals Board;
Uniform Mechanical Code, 2022 edition, including
appendices as follows, as published by the California
Building Standards Commission:
o Appendix B: Procedures to be followed to
Place Equipment into Operation
o Appendix C: Installation and Testing of Oil
Plumbing code
Energy code
Historical Building code
Fire code
Existing Building code
Green Building
Standards code
Reference Standards
code
Housing Code
(liquid) Fuel-fired Equipment
o DELETE Section 1.8.8 Appeals Board
o Appendix F: Sizing of Venting Systems
Serving Appliances Equipped With Draft
Hoods, Category 1 Appliances, and
Appliances Listed For Use With Type B
Vents;
California Plumbing Code, 2022 edition, including
appendices as follows, as published by the California
Building Standards Commission:
o Appendix A: Recommended Rules of Sizing
the Water Supply System
o Appendix B: Explanatory Notes on
Combination Waste and Vent Systems
o Appendix D: Sizing Storm Water Drainage
Systems
o Appendix I: Installation Standards
o Appendix H: Private Sewage Systems
o DELETE Section 1.8.8 Appeals Board;
California Energy Code, 2022 edition, excluding
appendices thereto, as published by the California
Energy Standards Commission;
California Historical Building Code, 2022 edition,
including appendices thereto, as published by the
California Building Standards Commission;
California Fire Code, 2022 edition, including
appendices thereto, as published by the California
Building Standards Commission;
California Existing Building Code, 2022 edition,
including appendices thereto, as published by the
California Building Standards Commission;
California green building Standards Code, 2022
edition, including appendices thereto, as published
by the California Building Standards Commission;
California Reference Standards Code, 2022 edition,
including appendices thereto, as published by the
California Building Standards Commission;
Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, as published
by the International Conference of Building
Officials;
Abatement of
dangerous buildings
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings, 1997 edition, as published by the
International Conference of Building Officials.

The above codes are hereby adopted by the City Council as the building codes of the City, for all intents and purposes and to the same effect as if each and every section, paragraph, subparagraph, word, phrase or clause contained therein were fully set forth herein. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. The City Council hereby declares it would have adopted each section, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. One copy of each of said codes hereby adopted are on file in the office of the building official and is available for examination by the public.

SECTION 3. Section 9-1-2(A)(6) of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Reedley City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"6. Automatic Sprinklers, Where Required.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, standard automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed and maintained in all group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, U, and HS occupancies exceeding five thousand (5,000) square feet in gross floor area.

When such areas have any eaves or an overhang exceeding a distance of three feet (3 ') from the wall or support, the gross roof area shall include, but not be limited to, covered walkways, patios, porches or any architectural feature attached to or within ten feet (1 O') of the structure. In existing buildings where an automatic sprinkler system does not exist, and a change in the character of occupancy or use is made, or the floor area is increased, and the gross floor area exceeds the areas set forth in this subsection before or after the addition or change, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be installed through the structure, unless a specific development agreement is approved by the building official for the existing areas.

Area separation walls, occupancy separation walls, or parapets shall not be used to create separate buildings on the same property to exclude required automatic sprinkler systems.

SECTION 4. Section 9-1-2(A)(7) of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the Reedley City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"7. Appeals Board.

The City shall establish a local appeals board and a housing appeals board. The local appeals board and housing appeals board shall be the governing body of the City. The board may appoint one or more hearing examiners to hear appeals brought before the board. The hearing examiners shall not be employees of the jurisdiction and shall be qualified and specifically knowledgeable in the California Building Standards Codes and applicable local ordinances. The hearing examiner or examiners shall submit a written report to the board. Such report shall contain a brief summary of the evidence considered and state the examiners findings, conclusions and recommendations.

SECTION 5. Section 9-1-2(B) of Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the. Reedley City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"B. Electrical Code:

Appeals Board
The City shall establish a local appeals board and a housing appeals board. The local appeals board and housing appeals board shall be the governing body of the City. The board may appoint one or more hearing examiners to hear appeals brought before the board. The hearing examiners shall not be employees of the jurisdiction and shall be qualified and specifically knowledgeable in the California Building Standards Codes and applicable local ordinances. The hearing examiner or examiners shall submit a written report to the board. Such report shall contain a brief summary of the evidence considered and state the examiners findings, conclusions and recommendations.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published by one insertion in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least five ( 5) days prior to adoption and again fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, then the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five ( 5) days prior to the Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.

This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-006 was introduced and given first reading by title only at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on the 8th day of November 2022, and was thereafter duly passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Annual Local Clinetological Data - IPS-4AFDD124-CFA2-4024-8... https://www.ocei.maa.gov/pub/orders/IPS/IPS-4AFDD124-CFA2-4 ...

I of 8
i,t'o1'1M0SPif~
EXHIBIT 1, Pg. 1 ✓~~
2021 {~~,
LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA \. ~
ANNUAL SUMMARY WITH COMPARATIVE DATAc~A~ll~,smofC~
-
LL
._,.
~ :J
~ (JJ
a.

E
~
110
100
90 80
70 60
50 40

FRESNO,

CALIFORNIA (KFAT)
Daily MaK/Min Temperature -- ·-· ---·--··---••·----.----------··-·-· --------··· - -- ·-•-·---· .

ISSN 0 198-0890
45 40
ss
0 so (I)
<C
25 m
20 m
15 -n
.......
10 0 30 ......,.. __ .,._.. _________ __,.. ________ .....-------,--~--'"" Jan
l.75

1.50 1.25
(I)
(lJ l.00 .r.
u
j; 0.75

0.50 0.25
Feb Mar Apr May Jun jLd Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan I- Normal Max - Normal Min - Freezing ,,. MaX/Mln I Daily Precipitation -----·------~·-··------ -----------~------ 45 40 35
3:
30 =
25 §'
(D
20 m
15 cri
10 5

0.00 -'--,---- r---"--...,._,~__,..---11...,--- -,---..-----.---..------..i-.....a...,-a.-.....-..1..-u. ........... 0 Jan

30.0 29. 9 · ~
~ 29. 8
~ 29. 7 ·
't5 29. 6 Ul
<I, -5 29.S
£ 29 . 4

29.3 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec: Jat"'I Daily· Station Pr·essure . .
• 1. 015
· 1,.010 :C (t)
n
rt'
· 1~005 _g
Q)

1. 000 ~
~
995 U1
Jan Feb Mar Apr May jiun JuE Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
l CERTI.FY THAT THIS IS AN OFFICIAL PUB LI CATION OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, AND IS COMPILED FROM RECORDS ON FILE AT THE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER. _n .

NATIONAL NATIONAL NATIONAL CENTERS ror Cl. _)__._, a ~ --· OCEANIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA F.NVIRON!\-lENTAL INl<'ORMATION (NCEI) -r DIRECTOR ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND INFOR!'vlATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA NCEI 8/24/2022, 9:28 AM
Annual Local Climatological Data - 1PS-4AFDD l 24-CFA2-4024-8 ... https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/orders/1PS/1PS-4AFDD124-CFA2-4 ... ~
>-'
s
;...
:S
~ ;:..
~
~
:-<
~
3 ~
:s
~
;:..
r:r.,
~ :s
z
2 :-<
~ ~
"" ;:..
0 = E:
~
~ ~
~
0 z
r:n
2 of8
METEOROLOGICAL DATA FOR 2021

FRESNO (KFAT)
EXHIBIT 1, Pg.2
LATITUDE: LO:\"GITUDE: ELEV A TIOl\ (FT): TI~IE ZO~E: WBA-""": 93193 36° 46'N 119° 43'W GR~l>: 334.29 BARO: 375 PACIFIC (UTC-8) ELEMEi\"T JA~ FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR MEAN DAILY MAXIMUM 59.6 64.9 67.6 79.8 87.6 97.0 I 03.3 100.2 94.1 76.6 66.5 55.0 79.4 HIGHEST DATL Y MAXIMUM 70 73 84 95 101 111 114 107 107 93 75 73 114 DA TE OF OCCURRENCE 17 01 31 30 31 19+ II 30+ 09 02 03+ 02+ nJLII MEAN DAILY MINIMUM 41.3 43.3 44.9 52.1 59.1 68.1 74.1 70.2 65.1 53.7 48.0 41.3 55. 1 LOWEST DAILY MINIMUM 35 38 38 47 50 53 67 62 56 45 39 33 33 DATE OF OCCURRENCE 26 21 + 16 27+ 20 10 16 22 29 19 26+ 19 DEC 19 AVERAGE DRY BULB 50.4 54.1 56.3 65.9 73.4 82.6 88.7 85.2 79.6 65.1 57.2 48.1 67.2 MEAN WET BULB 45.1 46.4 47.1 52.3 56.2 62.4 65.6 64.8 61.6 53 .7 52.4 45.3 54.4 MEAN DEW POINT 39.5 38.4 37.0 39.5 40.8 48.2 50.5 51.3 48.4 43.1 49.2 42.5 44.0 NUMBER OF DAYS WITH MAXIMUrv1 >= 90° 0 0 0 2 14 25 31 30 22 3 0 0 127
MAXIMUM <= 32° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MINIMUM <= 32° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MINIMUM <= 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HEATING DEGREE DAYS 445 298 269 37 6 0 0 0 0 69 226 517 1867 COOLING DEGREE DAYS 0 0 5 72 270 535 744 633 443 80 1 0 2783 MEAN (PERCENT) 71 59 53 42 34 34 30 35 38 51 80 83 51
HOUR 04 LST 80 76 72 64 55 53 46 53 59 67 92 91 67
HOUR 10 LST 68 53 46 35 28 27 25 29 31 43 75 81 45
HOUR 16 LST 56 40 33 23 18 18 15 18 20 35 63 73 34
HOUR22 LST 75 65 60 47 37 38 35 39 40 58 86 87 56
NUMBER OF DAYS WITH:

HEAVY FOG(VISBY <= 1/4 MI) 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8 27 THUNDERSTORMS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MEAN ST A TION PRESS. (IN.) 29.77 29.78 29.72 29.62 29.56 29.50 29.51 29.47 29.55 29.64 29.80 29.70 29.64 MEAN SEA-LEVEL PRESS. (IN.) 30.12 30. 13 30.07 29.97 29.91 29.84 29.85 29.81 29.89 29.99 30.16 30.06 29.98 RESULTANT SPEED (MPH) 0.6 2.4 2.2 5.0 7.3 7.3 6.1 5.3 3.6 1.6 1.0 I.I 3.3 RES. DIR. (TENS OF DEGS) 09 32 32 31 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 14 31 MEAN SPEED (J'v1PH) 4.5 5.2 5.6 6.4 8.6 8.4 7.5 6.7 5.8 5.3 3.4 5.1 6.0 PREVAIL.DIR(TENS OF DEGS) 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 29 29 29 29 30 MAXIMUM 2-MINUTE WIND
SPEED(MPH) 26 24 26 23 25 25 21 20 21 35 16 23 35
DIR. (TENS OF DEGS.) 12 31 33 31 30 31 17 31 31 31 10 14 31 DA TE OF OCCURRENCE 27 20 15 20 20 08 26 12 28 11 09 25 OCT II MAXIMUM 3-SECOND WIND:

SPEED(MPH) 31 29 35 28 37 31 29 25 28 44 20 29 44
DIR (TENS OF DEGS.) 14 31 22 32 30 30 31 3 1 31 31 10 12 31 DA TE OF OCCURRENCE 26 20 09 20 20 08 10 18 19 II 09 13 OCT!! WATER EQUIVALENT: 3.40 0.29 1.33 0.15 0 00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 1.27 0.30 3.64 10.38 TOTAL (IN.) 1.82 0.27 0.48 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.86 0.30 1.20 1.82 GREATEST 24-HOUR (IN.) 28-29 11-12 15 25 25 08-09 13-14 JAN 28-29 DATE OF OCCURRENCE Nl.J}.,fBER OF DAYS WITH: 8 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 11 32 PRECIPITATION O.Dl 6 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 I 8 22 PRECfPIT A TION 0.10 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 2 PRECIPITATION 1.00 SNOW,ICE PELLETS,HAIL 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 T TOTAL (IN.) 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T GREATEST 24-HOUR (IN.) 10 tv1AR 10 DATE OF OCCURRENCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tv1AXIMUM SNOW DEPTH (IN)

DATE OF OCCURRENCE
NUMBER OF DAYS WITH: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SNOWFALL >= 1.0 published by NCEI Asheville, NC 2
8/24/2022, 9:28 AM
Climato logical Data for Fresno Area , CA (ThreadEx) - May 2021 EXHIBIT 1, Pg.3 l emperat ure !
Date HDD CDD Precipitation New Snow Snow Depth i
Maximum Mi nimum Average Departure
2021 -05-0 1 87 59 73.0 6.8 0 8 0.00 0.0 0 I
l
202 1-05-02 84 52 68.0 1. 5 0 3 0.00 0.0 0 i
2021-05-03 86 58 72.0 5.2 0 7 0.00 00 0 i
202 1-05-04 92 62 77.0 9.9 0 12 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-05-05 98 64 81.0 13 .6 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
2021-05-06 91 66 78.5 10.9 0 14 0.00 0.0 0 i
202 1-05-07 82 58 70.0 2.1 0 5 0.00 0.0 0
2021-05-08 85 57 71.0 2.8 0 6 0.00 0.0 0
2021-05-09 88 60 74.0 5.5 0 9 0.00 0.0 0 I
202 1-05-10 90 60 75.0 6.3 0 10 0.00 0.0 0 I
i
202 1-05- 11 94 62 78.0 9.0 0 13 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-05-12 98 63 80.5 11.2 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-05- 13 96 64 80.0 10.5 0 15 0.00 0.0 0 I j
2021-05-14 94 62 78.0 8.2 0 13 0.00 0.0 0 I
I
202 1-05- 15 79 53 66.0 -4.0 0 I 0.00 0.0 0 I
2021-05-16 81 56 68.5 -1.8 0 4 0.00 0.0 0 I
202 1-05- 17 85 58 71.5 1. 0 0 7 0.00 0.0 0 I
2021-05-18 88 58 73.0 2.3 0 8 0.00 0.0 0 I
202 1-05- 19 83 57 70.0 - 1. 0 0 5 0.00 0.0 0 I
I
202 1-05-20 72 50 61. 0 -10.2 4 0 0.00 0.0 0 i
202 1-05-21 74 51 62.5 -8.9 2 0 0.00 0.0 0 l
202 1-05-22 77 52 64.5 -7.2 0 0 0.00 0.0 0 i
202 1-05-23 81 55 68.0 -3.9 0 3 0.00 0.0 0 I
!
2021-05-24 89 57 73.0 0.9 0 8 0.00 0.0 0
2021-05-25 89 64 76.5 4. 1 0 12 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-05-26 90 59 74.5 1.9 0 10 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-05-27 90 61 75.5 2.7 0 II 0.00 0.0 0 I
2021-05-28 90 60 75.0 2.0 0 10 0.00 0.0 0
2021-05-29 90 62 76.0 2.7 0 II 0.00 0.0 0 :
202 1-05-30 93 60 76.5 3.0 0 12 0.00 0.0 0
2021-05-3 I 101 71 86.0 12.3 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
Sum 271 7 1831 6 270 0.00 0.0
Ave rage 87.6 59.1 73.4 3.2 0.0
Normal 82.7 57. 6 70.2 32 191 0.42 0.0
Observations for each day co ver the 24 hours ending
at the time given below (Local Standard Time).

Max Temperature : midnight
Min Temperature: midnight
Precipitation : midnight
Snowfall : unknown
Snow Depth : unknown
Climatological Data for Fresno Area, CA (Thread Ex) - J une 202 1 EXHIBIT 1, Pg. 4 Tempe ratu re ;
Date IIDD CDD Precipitation New Snow Snow Depth
Maximum Minimum Average Departure !
202 1-06-01 104 75 89.5 15 .5 0 25 0.00 0.0 0 I
!
2021-06-02 104 72 88.0 13 .8 0 23 0.00 0.0 0 I
2021-06-03 102 70 86.0 11 .6 0 2 1 0.00 0.0 0 i
l
2021-06-04 IOI 72 86.5 11.8 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-05 99 68 83.5 8.6 0 19 0.00 0.0 0 i
2021-06-06 95 68 81.5 6.4 0 17 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-07 84 61 72.5 -2.9 0 8 0.00 0.0 0 I 2021-06-08 79 56 67.5 -8. 1 0 3 0.00 0.0 0 I I
202 1-06-09 77 55 66.0 -9,9 0 I 0.00 0.0 0
2021-06-10 79 SJ 66.0 -10.2 0 I 0.00 0.0 0 ;
202 1-06- 11 84 56 70.0 -6.4 0 5 0.00 0.0 0 :
202 1-06- 12 91 62 76.5 -0.2 0 12 0.00 0.0 0 ;
202 1-06-1 3 96 69 82.5 5.6 0 18 0.00 0.0 0 i 202 1-06- 14 92 66 79.0 1.8 0 14 0.00 0.0 0 i I
202 1-06- 15 92 65 78.5 1.0 0 14 0.00 0.0 0 i
2021-06-16 96 65 80.5 2.8 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06- 17 105 71 88.0 10.0 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-18 111 79 95.0 16.7 0 30 0.00 0.0 0
; 2021 -06- 19 111 78 94.5 15.9 0 30 0.00 0.0 0 :
; 202 1-06-20 108 76 92.0 13.2 0 27 0 00 0.0 0
202 1-06-2 1 104 71 87.5 8.4 0 23 0.00 0.0 0 :
2021-06-22 96 65 80.5 I. I 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
2021-06-23 96 65 80.5 0.9 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-24 92 66 79.0 -0.9 0 14 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-25 95 65 80.0 -0.2 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-26 JOO 72 86.0 5.6 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-06-27 107 79 93.0 12.3 0 28 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-28 102 73 87.5 6.6 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
202 1-06-29 104 73 88.5 7.3 0 24 0.00 0.0 0
2021-06-30 104 78 91.0 9.6 0 26 0.00 0.0 0
Sum 29 10 2044 - 0 535 0.00 0.0
Average 97.0 68. 1 82.6 5.0 - 0.0
Normal 9 1.4 63 .9 77.6 3 382 0.24 0.0
Observations for each day cover the 24 hours ending
at the tim e given below (Local Standard Time).

Max Temperature : midnight
Min Temperature : midnight
Precipitation : midn ight
Snowfall : unknown
Snow Depth : unknown
Climatological Data for Fresno Area, CA (ThreadEx) - July 2021 EXHIBIT 1 , Pg . 5 Date Temperature HDD CDD Precipitation New Snow Snow Depth Maximum Minimum Average Departure 2021-07-01 100 73 86.5 4.8 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-02 IOI 71 86.0 4.1 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-03 100 73 86.5 4.4 0 22 0.00 00 0
2021-07-04 IOI 71 86.0 3.7 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-05 100 68 84.0 1.5 0 19 000 0.0 0
2021-07-06 99 69 84.0 1.3 0 19 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-07 100 69 84.5 1.6 0 20 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-08 106 73 89.5 6.5 0 25 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-09 Ill 81 96.0 12.8 0 31 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-10 Ill 81 96.0 12.7 0 31 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-1 I 114 83 98.5 15.0 0 34 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-12 108 77 92.5 8.9 0 28 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-13 105 74 89.5 5.8 0 25 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-14 IOI 70 85.5 1.7 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-15 100 71 85.5 1.6 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-16 99 67 83.0 -0.9 0 18 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-17 102 70 86.0 2.0 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-18 99 74 86.5 2.4 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-19 106 79 92.5 8.4 0 28 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-20 104 75 89.5 5.4 0 25 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-21 102 70 86.0 1.9 0 21 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-22 104 71 87.5 3.4 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-23 103 72 87.5 3.4 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-24 103 73 88.0 3.9 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-25 103 76 89.5 5.4 0 25 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-26 98 79 88.5 4.4 0 24 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-27 104 77 90.5 6.5 0 26 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-28 102 73 87.5 3.5 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-29 106 77 91.5 7.6 0 27 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-30 107 81 94.0 IO. I 0 29 0.00 0.0 0
2021-07-31 103 78 90.5 6.7 0 26 0.00 0.0 0
Sum 3202 2296 0 744 0.00 0.0
Average 103.3 74.1 88.7 5.2 - - 0.0
Normal 97.7 69.3 83.5 0 573 0.03 0.0
Observations for each day cover the 24 hours ending
at the time given below (Local Standard Time).

Max Temperature : midnight
Min Temperature: midnight
Precipitation : midnight
Snowfall : unknown
Snow Depth : unknown
Climatological Data for Fresno Area, CA (ThreadEx)-August 2021 EXHIBIT 1, Pg. 6 Date Temperature HDD CDD Precipitation New Snow Snow Depth Maximum Minimum Average Departure 2021-08-01 l07 73 90.0 6.3 0 25 000 0.0 0
2021-08-02 102 68 85.0 1.4 0 20 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-03 104 70 87.0 3.5 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-04 107 74 90.5 7.0 0 26 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-05 100 68 84.0 0.6 0 19 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-06 97 64 80.5 -2.8 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-07 100 70 85.0 1.8 0 20 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-08 102 71 865 14 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021 -08-09 102 71 86.5 3.5 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-10 105 72 88.5 5.6 0 24 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-11 106 76 91.0 8.2 0 26 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-12 105 78 91.5 8.8 0 27 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-13 104 75 89.5 6.9 0 25 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-14 102 74 88.0 5.5 0 23 0.00 0.0 0
2021 -08-15 103 79 91.0 8.6 0 26 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-16 103 81 92.0 9.8 0 27 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-17 103 74 88.5 6.4 0 24 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-18 90 64 77.0 -5.0 0 12 0.00 00 0
2021-08-19 85 66 75.5 -6.4 0 II 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-20 91 67 79.0 -2.8 0 14 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-21 93 66 79.5 -2.2 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-22 91 62 76.5 -5.1 0 12 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-23 94 65 79.5 -2.0 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-24 96 65 80.5 -0.9 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-25 96 65 80.5 -0.7 0 16 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-26 98 65 81.5 0.4 0 17 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-27 99 67 83.0 2.0 0 18 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-28 104 70 87.0 6.1 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-29 106 71 88.5 7.8 0 24 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-30 107 73 90.0 9.4 0 25 0.00 0.0 0
2021-08-31 103 71 87.0 6.5 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
Sum 3105 2175 0 633 0.00 0.0
Average 100.2 70.2 85.2 3.0 0.0
Normal 96.5 67.9 82.2 0 533 0.00 0.0
Observations for each day cover the 24 hours ending
at the time given below (Local Standard Time).

Max Temperature : midnight
Min Temperature : midnight
Precipitation : midnight
Snowfall: unknown
Snow Depth: unknown
Climatological Data for Fresno Area, CA (ThreadEx) - September 2021 EXHIBIT 1 , Pg • 7 Date Temperature HOD CDD Precipitation New Snow Snow Depth Maximum Minimum Average Departure 2021-09-01 94 65 79.5 -0.8 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-02 91 59 75.0 -5.1 0 10 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-03 94 60 77.0 -3.0 0 12 000 0.0 0
2021-09-04 97 64 80.5 0.7 0 16 0.00 00 0
2021-09-05 101 65 83.0 3.3 0 18 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-06 104 70 87.0 7.5 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-07 106 72 89.0 9.7 0 24 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-08 104 70 87.0 7.9 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-09 107 76 91.5 12.6 0 27 0.00 0.0 0
2021 -09-10 98 76 87.0 8.3 0 22 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-11 97 70 83.5 5.0 0 19 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-12 99 69 84.0 5.8 0 19 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-13 99 68 83.5 5.5 0 19 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-14 100 68 84.0 6.3 0 19 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-15 97 68 82.5 5.0 0 18 000 0.0 0
2021-09-16 94 64 79.0 1.8 0 14 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-17 91 61 76.0 -1.0 0 II 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-18 87 61 74.0 -2.7 0 9 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-19 85 60 72.5 -3.9 0 8 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-20 88 60 74.0 -2.1 0 9 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-21 94 65 79.5 3.7 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-22 100 64 82.0 6.5 0 17 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-23 92 67 79.5 4.4 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-24 92 68 80.0 5.2 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-25 91 69 80.0 5.5 0 15 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-26 87 63 75.0 0.8 0 JO 000 0.0 0
2021-09-27 87 59 73.0 -0.8 0 8 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-28 78 60 69.0 -4.5 0 4 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-29 81 56 68.5 -4.6 0 4 0.00 0.0 0
2021-09-30 87 57 72.0 -0.7 0 7 0.00 0.0 0
Sum 2822 1954 0 443 0.00 0.0 -
Average 94.1 65.1 79.6 2.5 - 0.0
Normal 90.7 63.4 77.1 - 2 364 0.05 0.0
Observations for each day cover the 24 hours ending
at the time given below (Local Standard Time).

Max Temperature : midnight
Min Temperature : midnight
Precipitation : midnight
Snowfall : unknown
Snow Depth : unknown
Climatological Data for Fresno Area, CA (ThreadEx) - October 2021 EXHIBIT 1 , Pg · 8 Date
Tc mpe rature
HDD CDD Precipitation New Snow Snow Depth Maximum Minimum Average Departure 2021 -10-01 92 59 75.5 3.1 0 11 0.00 0.0 0
2021- 10-02 93 60 76.5 4.5 0 12 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-03 87 61 74.0 2.4 0 9 0.00 0.0 0
2021- 10-04 90 59 74.5 3.2 0 10 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-05 87 61 74.0 3.1 0 9 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-06 85 60 72.5 2.0 0 8 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-07 81 59 70.0 -0.1 0 5 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-08 67 52 59.5 -10.2 5 0 0.40 0.0 0
2021-10-09 72 49 60.5 -8.8 4 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-10 76 51 63.5 -5.5 1 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-11 70 53 61.5 -7.1 3 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-12 68 46 57.0 -11.2 8 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-13 73 46 59.5 -8.3 5 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-14 75 47 61.0 -6.4 4 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021 -10-15 82 50 66.0 -1.0 0 1 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-16 84 52 68.0 1.4 0 3 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-17 83 53 68.0 1.7 0 3 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-18 65 50 57.5 -8.4 7 0 0.01 0.0 0
2021-10-19 70 45 57.5 -8.0 7 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-20 76 54 65.0 -0.1 () 0 0.00 0.0 ()
2021-10-21 82 59 70.5 5.8 0 6 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-22 72 55 63.5 -0.8 I 0 T 0.0 0
2021-10-23 71 57 64.0 0.0 1 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-24 71 59 65.0 1.4 0 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-25 68 50 59.0 -4.2 6 0 0.86 0.0 0
2021-10-26 67 47 57.0 -5.8 8 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-27 70 50 60.0 -2.4 5 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-28 76 54 65.0 3.0 () 0 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-29 78 55 66.5 4.8 0 2 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-30 75 57 66.0 4.7 0 I 0.00 0.0 0
2021-10-31 68 54 61.0 0.1 4 0 0.00 0.0 0
Sum 2374 1664 - 69 80 1.27 0.0
Average 76.6 53.7 65.1 -1.6 - 0.0
Normal 78.7 54.6 66.7 - 56 108 0.56 0.0 -
Observations for each day cover the 24 hours ending
at the time given below (Local Standard Time).

Max Temperature : midnight
Min Temperature: midnight
Precipitation : midnight
Snowfall : unknown
Snow Depth : unknown
Fresno, CA - Climate & Monthly weather forecast https://www.weather-us.com/en/california-usa/fresno-c.limate#humidi ... 12 of 22
EXHIBIT 1, Pg. 9
Average humidity Fresno, CA
100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0
Humidity • Fresno, CA
Ill Humidity (%)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dae
Average humidity in January: 65%
Average humidity in February: 64%
Average humidity in March: 61 %
Average humidity in April: 54%
Average humidity in May: 44%
Average humidity in June: 33%
Average humidity in July: 28%
Average humidity In August: 29%
Average humidity in September: 31 %
Average humidity in October: 41 %
Average humidity in November: 52%
Average humidity in December: 64%
The month with the highest relative humidity is January (65%). The month with the lowest relative humidity is July (28%).
.,
location Today Tomorrow 10 • days Climate •
'f
8/ D4/2022, 9: 54 AM
Exhibit 2

HEAT STRESS INDEX

RELATIVE HUMIDITY
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
104 98 120
102 97 117
110
106
u. 104 0
LU 94 100
a: 92 87 92 96 100
~ 90 85
~ 122
a: 88 82 87 89 115 LU
a.. 86 80 85 87 109 ~ 84 78 83 85 99
~ 82 77 80 81 95
80 75 77 78 ' 79 89
78 72 75 77 78 85
76 70 72 75 76 77 77 78 79
74 68 70 73 74 75 75 76 77
NOTE Add '\0°F when protective clothing is worn and add 10°F when in direct sunlight.

HUMITURE °F
BELOW60°
80° - 90°
90° - 105(,
105° - 130"
ABOVE 130°
Table 1-1
DANGER

CATEGORY
NONE

CAUTION

EXTREME

CAUTION
DANGER

EXTREME
DANGER

INJURY THREAT

LITTLE OR NO DANGER UNDER NORMAL

CIRCUMSTANCES

FATIGUE POSSIBLE IF EXPOSURE IS PROLONGED

AND THERE IS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

HEAT CRAMPS AND HEAT EXHAUSTION

POSSIBLE IF EXPOSURE IS PROLONGED AND

THERE IS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

HEAT CRAMPS OR EXHAUSTION LIKELY, HEAT

STROKE POSSIBLE IF EXPOSURE IS PROLONGED

AND THERE IS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
HEAT STROKE IMMINENT!

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 13, 2022
D Consent Calendar
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
~ Public Hearing
ITEM NO: I I ----
TITLE: INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 2022-008, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 7 OF THE REEDLEY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TREES.

SUBMITTED: Russ Robertson, Public Works DirectorJ,d--
APPROVED: Nicole Zieba, City Manager . ·

RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley hold a Public Hearing on the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 2022-008, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Reedley amending Title 7, Chapter 2, Articles 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 pertaining to Trees.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Title 7, Chapter 2, of the Reedley Municipal Code pertaining to Trees was last updated in 1968. The purpose of the proposed ordinance amendment is to provide clarification of tree ownership and responsibilities pertaining to trees specifically located within the City's right of way or "Parkstrip Area".

The Parkstrip Area is defined as the area between the street curb and the public sidewalk. Many members of the public have the mistaken understanding that any and all trees located within the parkstrip are the responsibility of the City and the City is responsible for any and all maintenance of the trees. Many years ago the City would send crews out to trim the trees hanging over the street so that the street sweeper would have clearance to pass under them. This resulted in some of the public having the misconception that the trees were the responsibility of the City, which has never been the case. Due to liability concerns the practice of trimming privately owned trees hanging over the street ceased around 2005, however the City continues to get calls requesting the City to trim privately owned trees because the City trimmed them in the "past".

The City requires that before any trees are planted within the parkstrip area the property owner must obtain an encroachment permit so that the City can ensure that only trees that are on the City's master tree list are planted. Trees on the master tree list are medium sized trees and have root systems that are non-intrusive so that the City's infrastructure such as sidewalk and curb and gutter are protected from damage caused by tree roots. This also helps the property owner by providing a list of trees that are far less likely to cause damage and associated repair costs and liability issues in the future.

Attached to this staff report is Exhibit "A" which shows the proposed additions and deletions to the Reedley Municipal code sections as proposed in Ordinance 2022-008. To follow is a brief summary of the changes.

In Section 7-2-2, the definition of a "Parkstrip Area" has been added for clarification.

In Section 7-2-4, language was changed so that updates to the Master Tree list would only need to be approved by the City Council and not the Planning Commission and City Council.

In Section 7-2-5, clarifying language pertaining to unlawful plantings was added including language that private property trees shall not be planted within 5' of a public sidewalk In Section 7-2-6, clarifying language was added to define responsibilities of trees located within public streets, public property, and parkstrip areas.

In Section 7-2-7, clarifying language was added pertaining to permit requirements before a tree can be removed from a park strip or public right of way.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Exhibit "A"

2. Ordinance 2022-008

Exhibit "A"
Proposed changes to The Reedley Municipal code sections as proposed in Ordinance 2022- 008. Language crossed out is proposed to be deleted and language in red is proposed to be added.
7-2-2: DEFINITIONS
DIRECTOR: The Public Works Director, or designee, of the City.

PARKSTRIP AREA: The area between the street curb and the public sidewalk. 7-2-4: MASTER TREE LIST AND MASTER PLAN: The resolution of the city planning commIssIon dated November 21, 1968, which sets forth a master tree list and policies and objectives of a program of tree planting and control is hereby adopted as a master plan and master tree list for the purposes of this chapter and is incorporated into this chapter by reference the same as if fully stated herein. Revisions or changes in said master tree list and master plan may be made from time to time by the Director after submission of any such revisions or changes to the City Council planning commission for its approval. and the approval of the City Council.
7-2-5: UNLAWFUL PLANTINGS: No person shall plant any tree in any public street, nor within a public utility easement or parkstrip, nor shall any tree be planted by any property owner which may overhang any public street, without written approval from the Director. unless: a) such tree is listed on the master tree list, or b) a vvritten permit from the director shall have been first obtained to plant a tree not on said list. Trees planted on private property shall not be planted within 5' of a public sidewalk. 7-2-6: RESPONSIBILITY JURISDICTION AND CONTROL: The director shall be responsible for the administration of the chapter and and shall supervise, direct and control the planting, setting out, locating and placing of all trees in the public streets, and shall supervise, direct and control the care, trimming, removing, the relocating, planting, trimming, and replacing of all trees located within the public streets or on public property. overhanging the public streets. (Ord. 428, 12 17 1968) Trees located on private property, or within the parkstrip area, which is defined as the area between the street curb and the public sidewalk, are the sole responsibility of the property owner and the property owner shall be responsible for proper maintenance and care of the tree including irrigation and removal should the tree die or become a hazard. The property owner shall be responsible and liable for any and all damages to City property caused by the tree including damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, etc.

In Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD); trees located within the park strip area, which is defined as the area between the street curb and the public sidewalk, and which were originally planted and permitted by the City or planted by the property owner with written permission from the City shall be maintained by the City. The property owner shall be responsible for proper irrigation of the tree (s) and maintenance of all associated irrigation pipeing. No tree shall be planted, trimmed, altered, or removed from the parkstrip area without written permission from the City. 7-2-7: TREE CARE, PLANTING, REMOVING AND REPLACEMENT: It shall be unlawful for any person other than the director or his duly authorized agent or deputy to cut, trim, prune, spray, brace, plant, move or replace any tree in any public street within the city, or to cause same to be done, unless and until a written permit is obtained from the Director so to do shall have first been obtained from the director. Any such permit may be declared void by the director if any of the provisions of this chapter are violated or if any condition of the permit is violated. Whenever it is necessary to remove a tree within a parkstrip area or a public right of way, to prevent damage to sidevvalks or curbs or for the approved street construction or to remove a dying, decayed, diseased, hazardous or dead tree, or for any other public improvement or necessity, the abutting property owner of that portion of the public right of way or parkstip area where the tree is located, shall first secure a written permit from the director and provide

sufficient reason as to why tree must be removed. Upon removal of such tree (or trees) The owner shall replace the tree with a tree onf a variety given in the master tree list and/or master tree plan unless a written request to not replace the tree is provided to the Director and approved. Tree replacement may not be required when the location would be in conflict with drives, walks or other construction permitted in public rights of 1,11ay or is not suitable for planting. /\ written release signed by the director, stating the reason for the requiring a replacement, shall be required.

Nothing in this section shall preclude the removal by city forces of any tree without the request of the owner. (Ord. 428, 12 17 1968)

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-008

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AMENDING VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 7 OF THE

REEDLEY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TREES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Sections 7-2-2, 7-2-4, 7-2-5, 7-2-6, and 7-2-7 of Chapter 2 of Title 7 of the Reedley Municipal Code are hereby amended, respectively, to read as follows:
7-2-2: DEFINITIONS:

CITY:

OWNER:

PERSON:

DIRECTOR:

PUBLIC STREETS
OR STREETS:

The City of Reedley.

The legal owner of real property and shall not include a lessee or other person occupying such property with the consent of the owner.

As used in this chapter shall be broadly construed to include an individual, a firm, and association, a corporation, a copartnership, and the lessees, trustees, receivers, agents, servants and employees of such person.

The Public Works Director, or designee, of the City.

Shall include all roads, streets, avenues, boulevards, alleys, parkways, public places and public right of way, or any portion thereof, of the City.

PARKS TRIP AREA: The area between the street curb and the public sidewalk. 7-2-4: MASTER TREE LIST AND MASTER PLAN: The resolution of the city planning commission dated November 21 , 1968, which sets forth a master tree list and policies and objectives of a program of tree planting and control is hereby adopted as a master plan and master tree list for the purposes of this chapter and is incorporated into this chapter by reference the same as if fully stated herein. Revisions or changes in said master tree list and master plan may be made from time to time by the Director after submission of any such revisions or changes to the City Council for its approval.
7-2-5: UNLAWFUL PLANTINGS: No person shall plant any tree in any public street, nor within a public utility easement or parkstrip, nor shall any tree be planted by any property owner which may overhang any public street, without written approval from the Director. Trees planted on private property shall not be planted within 5' of a public sidewalk. 1 7-2-6: RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL: The director shall be responsible for the administration of the chapter and the relocating, planting, trimming, and replacing of all trees located within the public streets or on public property.

Trees located on private property, or within the parkstrip area, which is defined as the area between the street curb and the public sidewalk, are the sole responsibility of the property owner and the property owner shall be responsible for proper maintenance and care of the tree including irrigation and removal should the tree die or become a hazard. The property owner shall be responsible and liable for any and all damages to City property caused by the tree including damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, etc.

In Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD); trees located within the park strip area, which is defined as the area between the street curb and the public sidewalk, and which were originally planted and permitted by the City or planted by the property owner with written permission from the City shall be maintained by the City. The property owner shall be responsible for proper irrigation of the tree (s) and maintenance of all associated irrigation piping. No tree shall be planted, trimmed, altered, or removed from the parkstrip area without written permission from the City.
7-2-7: TREE CARE, PLANTING, REMOVING AND REPLACEMENT: It shall be unlawful for any person other than the director to cut, trim, prune, spray, brace, plant, move or replace any tree in any public street within the city, or to cause same to be done, unless and until a written permit is obtained from the Director. Any such permit may be declared void by the director if any of the provisions of this chapter are violated or if any condition of the pe1mit is violated. Whenever it is necessary to remove a tree within a parkstrip area or a public right of way, the abutting property owner of that portion of the public right of way or parkstrip area where the tree is located, shall first secure a written permit from the director and provide sufficient reason as to why tree must be removed. The owner shall replace the tree with a tree on the master tree list and/or master tree plan unless a written request to not replace the tree is provided to the Director and approved.

Nothing in this section shall preclude the removal by city forces of any tree without the request of the owner.

SECTION 2: If any article, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each article, section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more articles, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, and phrases be declared invalid.

SECTION 3: The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance or a summary thereof to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 36933.
2 SECTION 4: The City Clerk is further directed to cause this ordinance to be codified after its adoption.

SECTION 5: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

The foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-008 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on December 13, 2022, and was thereafter duly adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on ______ , by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
3 DATE:

TITLE:

December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
[8J Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 12
CONSIDER ACTION RELATED TO ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 20) TO THE CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) WHICH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING:

A. RESOLUTION 2022-098, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REEDLEY ANNEXING OF TERRITORY TO A COMMUNITY FACILITIES

DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX, AND SUBMITTING

LEVY OF TAX TO QUALIFIED ELECTORS, CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 20 B. RESOLUTION 2022-099, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REEDLEY DECLARING RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION,

DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, AND DIRECTING

RECORDING OF AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN, CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 20
SUBMITTED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manager
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
In procedural order

1. That the City Council hold a public hearing for the Annexation of Territory (Annexation No. 20) to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services).

2. Consider approval of Resolution No. 2022-098, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley annexing of territory to a Community Facilities District, authorizing the levy of a special tax, and submitting levy of tax to qualified electors, City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) Annexation No. 20.

3. Call for Special Election and have the City Clerk open the ballot(s) and announce the vote(s).

4. Consider approval of Resolution No. 2022-099, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley declaring results of a special annexation election, determining validity of prior proceedings, and directing recording of Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien, City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) Annexation No. 20.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A condition to annex into the Community Facilities District (CFO) was imposed on new developments being processed by the City in November of 2005, when the District was established. Since that time, all properties must petition to be annexed to the existing CFO when development is proposed.

To initiate the process for annexation of territory to the CFO, the City Council approved a Resolution of Intention (Annexation No. 20) on October 25, 2022. The Resolution of Intention set a public hearing for December 13, 2022. The actions by the Council on December 13, 2022, will finalize the annexation of territory to the CFO.

BACKGROUND
Since the requirement to annex into the CFO was imposed on all new development, development processed after November 2005 must be annexed into the existing CFO. Several property owners have submitted petitions to annex into the CFO as provided by the conditions of development of their property.

To initiate the process for annexation of territory to a CFO, the City Council approved a Resolution of Intention for Annexation No. 20 on October 25, 2022. The Resolution of Intention (ROI) set a public hearing for December 13, 2022. The Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA) referred to in the ROI is the same as adopted by the City Council with the Resolution of Formation in 2005. The RMA provides, among other things, definitions of the special tax categories, identifies what properties will be taxed, and the maximum special tax.

The purpose of the public hearing is to take public comment on the annexation of territory to the CFO and to accept protests from any property owner within the proposed boundaries. If no property protests are received, the Council may take the initial action to annex the territory to the CFO by approving a resolution on the annexation to the CFO and approving calling a special property owner election. Once the election is called, the City Clerk opens and tabulates the ballots. If two-thirds (2/3) of the returned ballots consent to the annexation, then the City Council can take action to direct the recording of the Notice of Special Tax Lien.

FISCAL IMPACT
If approved, the additional development to be annexed into the CFO will be placed on an upcoming tax roll.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
On November 5, 2005 the City Council adopted the Resolution of Formation of the Community Facility District. Nineteen property annexations have been completed since formation of the CFO. On October 25, 2022, the City Council initiated the annexation of territory known as Annexation No. 20.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Map of CFO Annexation No. 20 .

2. Resolution 2022-098; Resolution Authorizing the Levy of Tax with Exhibit A Ballots

3. Resolution 2022-099; Resolution Declaring Results of Special Election with Exhibit A Results

4. Fresno County Recorder's Office Filing of Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien

5. Fresno County Recorder's Office Filing of Amendment A to Notice of Special Tax Lien APNs

6. Fresno County Recorder's Office Filing of Amendment B to Notice of Special Tax Lien Canvass and Statement of Result of Election
...

NORTH SCALE NTS
~ Proposed Annexation Area
LJ Current Boundary
LJ Future Annexation Area (City Limits)

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
365-082-36
368-212-01
370-070-95
370-091 -05
370-091-06
370-100-09
370-100-12
370-100-13
370-100-42
370-100-72
370-240-45
370-240-50
370-240-59 ~',
370-240-66 ---·--·-

WOLSONAVE
ANNEXATION MAP NO. 20
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
SHEET 1 OF 1

E SOUTH AVE
~ I iL l~, U) IE uuu
w
~ 0
:ll
Q'.
z

W MANNING AVE
~ r--~ -1~ Annexation
w
~ 0
0 0
?:
:.:
z
g
z
n
~
wl Proposed
~ o led Area I 365~82-36 U) .... C]Cj~
1maB1 r~B' L.5CJ ~c::J b_dc:J
[_.:::JC]
CJ
hJ
{PUBLIC SERVICES)

CITY OF REEDLEY

COUNTY OF FRESNO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Reference is hereby made to that certain map entitled "Proposed Boundary Map of the Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), City of Reedley, County of Fresno, State of California" filed the 12th day of October, 2005, at the hour of 4:00 o'clock p.m. in Book 41 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities District at page 58, (document no. 024171900) in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno, State of California, which this Annexation Map affects.

Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Reedley this _th day of ___ _, 2022.

By: ::---:-:---::::------,--,-....,,..,--,
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
I hereby certify that the within map showing proposed boundaries of Annexation No. 20 to the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), County of Fresno, State of California, was approved by the City Council of the City of Reedley, at a meeting thereof, held on the _th day of ____ , 2022, by its Resolution No. ___ _
By:::---:-:---::::-----,---
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Filed this_ day of ___ ~ 2022, at the hour of __
o'clock_.m., in the Book _ Page_ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts and as Instrument No. ____ _ in the office of the County Recorder in the County of Fresno, State of California.

Note:

Paul Dictos By: Deputy County Recorder
County Recorder
County of Fresno
State of California
This diagram is only for the purpose of indicating the lots being assessed the assigned assessment numbers for said lots and the relationship to the surrounding streets.
~
1':&:'l WI LLD AN I
Financial Services ,_--,0
For a detailed description of the lines and dimension of the lots, reference is made to the Fresno County Assessor's Maps for the fiscal year 20202-2023. For the information on the streets and other appurtenant lines and dimensions within the subdivided area reference is made to the filed tract maps.
27368 Via lndustria #200
Temeculn, CA 92590
(951 )587-3500
Fresno County Assessor's Parcel Number of the land to be included in the Community Faci6tie~ Dislrict No. 2005-1 Annexation Map No. 20:
365-082-36, 368-212-01 , 370-070-95, 370-091-05, 370-091-06, 370-100-09, 370-100-12, 370-100-13, 370-1 00-42, 370-100-72, 370-240-45, 370-240-50, 370-240-59, and 370-240-66 Exempt from SB2 fees Gov/! Code Sections 27388.1 (a)(2)(0) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-098

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ANNEXING OF

TERRITORY TO A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A

SPECIAL TAX, AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF TAX TO QUALIFIED ELECTORS, CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 20
WHEREAS, this Council, on October 25, 2022 adopted Resolution No. 2022-086 (Resolution of Intention) stating its intention to annex territory to the City's Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) ("CFO"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Act); and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Resolution of Intention, incorporating a description and map of the proposed boundaries of the territory to be annexed to the CFO and stating the facilities to be provided and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the CFO to pay for the services of the CFO, is on file with the City Clerk and the provisions thereof are fully incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set December 13, 2022, as the date of the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on the 13th of December 2022, this Council held a public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed annexation of territory to the CFO; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the annexation of territory to the CFO and the levy of said special taxes within the area proposed to be annexed were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, prior to the time fixed for said hearing, written protests had not been filed against the proposed annexation of territory to the CFO by (i) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the existing CFO, or (ii) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFO, or (iii) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the existing CFO, or (iv) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFO; and
WHEREAS, Annexation Map No. 20 to the CFO has been filed with the County Recorder of the County of Fresno, which map shows the territory to be annexed in these proceedings, and a copy thereof is on file with the City Clerk.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All prior proceedings taken by this Council, with respect to the CFO and the proposed annexation of territory thereto, have been duly considered and are hereby determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act, and the CFO has been validly established pursuant to the Act. It has been determined that this project will intensify the use of the property creating a need for more services under this CFO.

Section 2. The description and map of the boundaries of the territory to be annexed to the CFO, as described in said Annexation No. 20 to the CFO on file with the City Clerk are hereby finally approved, are incorporated herein by reference, and shall be included within the boundaries of the CFO, and said territory is hereby ordered annexed to the CFO, subject to voter approval of the levy of the special taxes therein as hereinafter provided.

Section 3. The provisions of the Resolution of Intention, has heretofore been adopted by this Council and are by this reference incorporated herein, as if fully set forth herein.

Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax within the territory to be annexed to the CFO shall be submitted to the voters of the area to be annexed to the CFO at an election called therefore as hereinafter provided.

Section 5. This Council hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFO for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing heretofore conducted and concluded by this Council for the purposes of these annexation proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Council finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFO and that the vote shall be by said landowners, each having one vote for each acre or each portion thereof such landowner owns in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFO.

Section 6. Pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail ballot, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Elections Code governing mail ballot elections of cities, and in particular the provisions of Division 4 (commencing with Section 4000), of that Code, insofar as they have not been waived by the unanimous consent of all landowners of the territory to be annexed to the CFO.

Section 7. The Council calls a special election to consider the measure described in the ballot referred to in paragraph 8 below, which election will be held on December 13, 2022, ("Election Day") at Reedley City Council Chambers, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California.

Section 8. The City Clerk will be the election official to conduct the election and caused to be provided to each landowner in the territory to be annexed to the CFO, a ballot in the form of Exhibit A hereto, which is hereby approved.

Section 9. The City Clerk has accepted the ballots of the qualified electors received prior to 7:00 p.m. on Election Day, whether received by mail or by personal delivery.

Section 10. This Council hereby further finds that the provisions of Section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days to elapse before said election is for the protection of voters, that the voters have waived such requirement and the date for the election hereinabove specified is established accordingly.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of December 2022.

Mayor of the City of Reedley
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
I, Ruthie Greenwood, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF REEDLEY DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-098 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of December 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Laurie Avedisian-Favini, City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
City of Reedley
Community Facilities District No. 2005-1
(Public Services)
Annexation No. 20

OFFICIAL BALLOT

SPECIAL TAX ANNEXATION ELECTION
This ballot is for the special landowner election. You must return this ballot in the enclosed envelope to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Reedley no later than 7:00 p.m. on December 13, 2022, either by mail or in person. The City Clerk's office is located at City Hall, 1717 9th Street, Reedley, California, 93654.

To vote, mark in the voting square after the word "YES" or after the word "NO". For a list of acceptable marks, please refer to the back of this ballot.

If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return to the City Clerk of the City of Reedley and obtain another.

BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Reedley, by
and for its Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services,) (the "CFO"), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the CFO pursuant to and as described in the Resolution of Intention of the City of Reedley adopted by its Council on October 25, 2022?
YES: D
NO:D
By executing in the space provided below, you also confirm your waiver of the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for notice of election and analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326 (a) and 53327 (b) of the California Government Code.

Acres Owned Within Territory Annexed:

Number of Votes:

Property Owner:

Property Owner/Authorized Representative Signature: __________ _ RESOLUTION NO. 2022-099

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY DECLARING RESULTS

OF A SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR

PROCEEDINGS, AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN, CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES) ANNEXATION NO. 20
WHEREAS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by the City Council pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Act), this City Council has heretofore adopted a resolution calling a special election of the qualified landowner electors in the territory of land proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) ("CFO"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the resolution, which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference, the special election has been held and the City Clerk has filed a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election (Canvass) a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, this City Council has reviewed the Canvass and hereby approves it.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The issue presented at the special election was the levy of a special tax within the territory to be annexed to the CFO to be levied in accordance with the formula heretofore approved by this City Council as described in Resolution No. 2022-098, a Resolution of the City Council Annexing of Territory to a Community Facilities District, Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax and Submitting Levy of Tax to Qualified Electors, City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), Annexation No. 20, adopted December 13, 2022.

Section 2. Pursuant to the Canvass on file with the City Clerk, the issue presented at the special election was approved by the landowners of the territory annexed to the CFO by more than two-thirds of the landowners voting at the special election.

Section 3. Pursuant to the voter approval, said annexed territory to the CFO is hereby declared to be fully annexed to and part of the CFO and this Council may levy special taxes therein as heretofore provided in these proceedings.

Section 4. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions, taken by this Council pursuant to the CFO and the territory annexed thereto were valid and in conformity with the Act.

Section 5. Within 15 days of the date hereof, the City Clerk shall execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno, an amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien as required by Section 3117.5 of the California Streets and Highway Code.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of December, 2022.

Mayor of the City of Reedley
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
I, Ruthie Greenwood, CITY CLERK of the CITY OF REEDLEY DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-099 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of December 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Laurie Avedisian-Favini, City Attorney
Exhibit A
City of Reedley
Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) Annexation No. 20

CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF ELECTION
I hereby certify that on this date, I canvassed the returns of the election held on December 13, 2022, in the territory annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) of the City of Reedley which election is designed as the Special Tax Annexation Election, and the cast for and against the measure are as follows and the total as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct:

City of Reedley Community Facilities Qualified
District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) Landowner Votes Votes Cast YES NO Annexation No. 20 Special Tax 32 Annexation Election, December 13, 2022 BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Reedley, by and for its Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the "CFO") be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the CFO pursuant to and as described in the Resolution of Intention of the City of Reedley adopted by its Council on October 25, 2022? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022.

CITY OF REEDLEY
By: ________ _
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Recorded for and by the benefit of and
When recorded Mail to:

Exempt from SB2 fees per Gov't Code Section 27388.1 (a)(2)(D) City of Reedley
City Clerk
1717 Ninth Street
Reedley, California 93654

AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN

CITY OF REEDLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
(PUBLIC SERVICES)
Annexation No. 20
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Section 53311, et. seq., of the California Government Code (the "Act"), the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Reedley (the "City"), County of Fresno, State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax is hereby imposed by the City Council of the City, County of Fresno, State of California, on the property described herein. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of paying the costs of services described in, and said special tax is to be levied according to the rate and method of apportionment set forth in, that certain Notice of Special Tax Lien heretofore recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno, State of California on November 22, 2005 at the hour of 2: 17 o'clock p.m. as Document No. 2005-0275325, to which recorded Notice of Special Tax Lien reference is hereby made and the provisions of which are hereby incorporated herein in full by this reference.

This Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien amends the Notice of Special Tax Lien to add to the territory of the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) the lands set forth in that certain "Annexation Map No. 20 of the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), County of Fresno, State of California," heretofore recorded on November 7, 2022 at the hour of 4:15 o'clock p.m. at Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts (Document No. 2022-0137216) in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno, State of California.

The assessor's tax parcel number(s) of all parcels or any portion thereof which are included in this 20th Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien, together with the name(s) of the owner(s) thereof, as they appear on the latest secured assessment roll as of the date of recording hereof or as are otherwise known to the City are as set forth in Exhibit A hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Exhibit 8 hereto and hereby made a part hereof contains results of the election of Annexation 20.

For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Assistant City Manager of the City of Reedley, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California 93654, telephone number (559) 637-4200 extension 300.

Dated:

By:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A" TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN

CITY OF REEDLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
(PUBLIC SERVICES)
ANNEXATION NO. 20

ASSESSOR'S PARCELNUMBERS AND OWNERS OF LAND WITHIN
ANNEXATION NO. 20 TO CITY OF REEDLEY
, COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-01
(PUBLIC SERVICES)
Fresno County Assessor's Parcel Nos.
365-082-36
368-212-01
370-070-95
370-091-05
370-091-06
370-100-09
370-100-12
370-100-13
370-100-42
Name of Property Owners
Immanuel Schools
1128 South Reed Avenue
Reedley, CA 93654
Maurice G & Cindy June Donaldson Trs
1508 11 th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Epic Rentals, LLC
521 Finley Drive
Taft, CA 93268
1857 East Main Street, LLC
25 East Airways Blvd
Livermore, CA 94551
1857 East Main Street, LLC
25 East Airways Blvd
Livermore, CA 94551
Pena Disposal Inc
12094 Ave 408
Cutler, CA 93615
NS Manning LLC
3721 Elberta Circle
Dinuba, CA 93618
NS Manning LLC
3721 Elberta Circle
Dinuba, CA 93618
Pena Disposal Inc
12094 Ave 408
Cutler, CA 93615
370-100-72
370-240-45
370-240-50
370-240-59
370-240-66
NS Manning LLC
3721 Elberta Circle
Dinuba, CA 93618
Jaber Auto Group Inc
1646 G Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Jaber Auto Group Inc
1646 G Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Jaber Auto Group Inc
1646 G Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Kenneth James & Janet Marilyn Enns Trust
P.O. Box 485
Pismo Beach, CA 93448
EXHIBIT "B" TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
ANNEXATION NO. 20 ELECTION

CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF ELECTION
I hereby certify that on this date, I canvassed the returns of the election held on this date in the territory annexed to the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) which election is designated as the Annexation No. 20 Election, and the total number of ballots cast in the territory to be annexed and the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct:

City of Reedley
Community Facilities District No. 2005-1
Annexation No. 20 Election,
December 13, 2022
Qualified
Landowner
Votes
Votes
Cast YES NO
BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Reedley, by and for its City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the "District"), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the District pursuant to and as described in Resolution No 2022-098, adopted by the Council of the City of Reedley on December 13, 2022.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 13th day of December, 2022.

CITY OF REEDLEY
By:----------
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

December 13, 2022

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
~ Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ----

CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PERTAINING TO POLICE DEPARTMENT POSITIONS A) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-095 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REEDLEY ADOPTING REVISED MASTER SALARY TABLES ADDING

THE POLICE SUPPORT SERVICES SUPERVISOR CLASSIFICATION TO UNREPRESENTED RANGE 54-U
B) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-096 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REEDLEY AMENDING THE SALARY AND BENEFIT SCHEDULE FOR

UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES ADDING THE POLICE SUPPORT
SERVICES SUPERVISOR CLASSIFICATION TO RECOGNIZED MIDMANAGEMENT POSITIONS

C) APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SIDE

LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH THE REEDLEY POLICE OFFICERS
ASSOCIATION REVISING ARTICLE 14 SPECIALTY PAY TO ADD

ASSIGNMENT TO THE FRESNO COUNTY ADULT COMPLIANCE TEAM AS

AN ELIGIBLE SPECIALTY PAY

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the attached Resolutions No. 2022-095 and 2022-096, amending the current Master Salary Tables and salary and benefit schedule for full-time Unrepresented employees, respectively, which adds the Police Support Services Supervisor classification to Unrepresented positions. Approval of these actions will not result in an additional position in the Police Department. In addition, staff recommends approval of a Side Letter of Agreement with the Reedley Police Officers Association recognizing the Fresno County Adult Compliance Team as an eligible assignment for 5.0% Specialty Pay.

BACKGROUND
Police Support Services Supervisor
The Reedley Police Department has had a Records & Communications Supervisor as part of the Reedley Police Officers Association (RPOA) for over 20 years . This particular supervisor is currently responsible for

the Records Division and the Communications (Dispatch) Center, and supervises seven Dispatchers, two Records Technicians, and reports to the Support Services Division Commander. Over the years, this position has become responsible for other areas such as department information technology, building maintenance, jail maintenance, custodian of records, and other assignments not previously the responsibility of the Records & Dispatch Supervisor.

Due to the increased workload and responsibilities, the title of Records & Communications Supervisor does not encompass the general nature of the duties of the position. The proposed classification of Police Support Services Supervisor encapsulates the responsibilities required of the person assigned to this position. The Police Support Services Supervisor would be classified as an Unrepresented full-time employee in the mid-management group, allowing them to be compensated with like positions in the overall City staff makeup with commensurate duties & responsibilities. The employee assigned to this position would no longer be an hourly employee, but would be considered a salaried employee.

Specialty Pay for Adult Compliance Team Officer
The City wishes to amend the current 2022-2024 Memorandum of Understanding with the Reedley Police Officers Association to add the existing 5.0% Specialty Pay benefit for the Officer who is assigned to the Fresno County Adult Compliance Team, identical to the additional pay already available for Detective, School Resource Officer, Motor Officer, or K-9 Officer. Other law enforcement agencies have added this benefit for officers assigned to this unit, and has no impact to the City Budget as the County of Fresno reimburses the City of Reedley for these costs.

FISCAL IMPACT
The transition of the existing Records & Communications Supervisor full-time position from RPOA to Unrepresented status does not have a material impact to the budget. The Police Support Services Supervisor position would receive a roughly 8% increase to compensate for the loss of future overtime pay for extra hours worked, since the position would now be salaried like all other supervisors in the City except for Police Sergeants, which are legally required to be hourly. Lastly, the addition of the Fresno County Adult Compliance Team to the list of assignments eligible for the 5.0% Specialty Pay will increase the compensation for up to one Police Officer while actively assigned to the unit; however, all costs are fully reimbursed by the County of Fresno, and this is an eligible benefit under that program.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2022-095 Master Salary Tables
Resolution No. 2022-096 Unrepresented Employees Salary & Benefit Schedule Side Letter of Agreement with the Reedley Police Officers Association

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-095

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REEDLEY ADOPTING MASTER SALARY TABLES

FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
WHEREAS, Section 36506 of the Government Code of the State of California provides that the City Council shall, by Resolution or Ordinance, fix the compensation for all appointive officers and employees; and
WHEREAS, the Master Salary Tables are attached as Exhibit 'A' to this Resolution has been reviewed and considered by the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Reedley as follows:

1. The Master Salary Tables attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' are hereby adopted.

2. All prior resolutions concerning compensation for City employees that are in conflict with this Resolution or the attached Master Salary Tables are hereby repealed, and this Resolution shall be effective January 1, 2023.

The foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted on the 13th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
RANGE
37-U
38-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION
Fire Administrative Clerk
Staff Assistant
---------------------------

STEP A STEP B STEP C
Hourly __ $ 1~_. 0529 __ _ $ 2~.0058 J $ 21.0~63
Bi-weekly $ 1,524 $ 1,600 I $ 1,681
. - - · 1 --- . Monthly $ 3,303 $ 3,468 $ 3,641
Annual $ 39,630 $ 41,612 $ 43,693
STEPD
$ 22.0567 - $ 1,765
--·
$ 3,823 .. ... ··-· -·- $ 45,878
STEPE
$ 23.1596 .. - -····
$ 1,853
---- - $ 4,014 ... ·-···-
$ 48,172
Accounting Technician I 1~ B;:~::,, j :-1~;;::!_j :20;:;::_ :_ 2:;:;~ ; 2:~~:;; 2\~::1 . Monthly $ 3,385 1 $ 3,554 $ 3,732 $ 3,919 $ 4,115 --------~~~~--~-~~~~~~~------[ ..-Annual 1$ -40,6211 $ 4 2:6si l $ 44/85 r $ 47j)24 . $. 49,375 39-U
40-U
41-U
42-U
43-U
44-U
Hourly l ! -~-~ 78 I $ 21.0188 .I $ 22.~6~7 j $ 23.!731_ $ 24.33~7- Bi-weekly J_ ~ ~'. 60~ $ 1_'. 6~2 t $ 1_? ~?. 1 $ 1,_8_~4 ___ $ !:~~7 __ Monthly $ 3,470 $ 3,643 $ 3,825 $ 4,017 $ 4,218
Aaaual l $ -41,637 $ 4:i:719 l $ 45:905 $ 48,200 $ 50,61_0_ I Hourly
Bi-weekly
$ 20:_~183 . $ 21.5442 { $ 22.6~16 I $ 23. 7529 j $ 24.~~0_4. $ 1,641 $ 1,724 I $ 1,810 $ 1,900 l $ 1,995
, Monthly
~----------,-----' Annual
. $ 3:557 $ 3,734 I $ 3,921 l $ -4~ 1 fr l $ 4,323
. $ 42,67·8 1 $ 44,812 l $ 47,053 . $ 49,406 1 $ 51~876_ Facilities Coordinator (FLSA Exempt)
Recreation Coordinator (FLSA Exempt)
Senior Citizens Coordinator (FLSA Exempt)
Accounting Technician II
Administrative Assistant
Human Resources Technician
CAD Technician
Building Permit Technician
I Hourly
I Bi-weekly
~-~~0313 : $ 2~-~82_? I $ 23_1_810 $ 2~_34~2 _ $ 25.5635 __ $ 1,683 $ 1,767 $ 1,855 $ 1,948 $ 2,045 - --
I Monthly $ 3,645 $ 3,828 $ 4,019 $ 4,220 $ 4,431
r Annual
- - - $ 43,745 $ 45,932 1 $ 48,229 $ 50,640 $ 53,172
~ Hourly I $ 21.~~72 ! $ 2H_351 J $ 23.7668 I $ J~ j $_ 2~-~0~9 i Bi-weekly : ~ _ 1,725 ; $ 1,811 $ 1,901 I $ 1,9~6 $ 2.!.096 I Monthly J $ 3,737 i $ 3,923 I $ 4,120 I $ 4,326 j $ 4,542 j Annual 1 $ 44,839 l $ 47,081 l $ 49,435 l $ 51,907 $ 54,502 \
Hourly ; $ 22.0962 I $ 23.2010 I $ 24.3611 j $ 25:57_93 $ 26.8582 1 Bi-weekly I $ 1,768 l $ 1,856 I $ 1,949 I $ 2,046 $ 2,149 T ... - - Monthly 1$ 3,830 I $ 4,022 I $ 4,223 i $ 4,434 $ 4,655
..

Annual $ 45,960 . $ 48,258 $ 50,671 $ 53,205 I$ 55,865
I Hourly $ 22.6486 $ 23.7808 $ 24.9697 $ 26.2183 $ 27.5293 Bi-weekly $ 1,812 $ 1,902 $ 1,998 ' $ 2,097 $ 2,202
Monthly $ 3,926 $ 4,122 $ 4,328 $ 4,545 $ 4,772
I
Annual $ 47,109 $ 49,464 $ 51,937 $ 54,534 $ 57,261
RANGE
45-U
46-U
47-U
48-U
49-U
50-U
51-U
52-U
..

EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION
Life Safety / Code Officer
Community Development Technician
Building Inspector I
Engineering Technician

STEP A STEPB STEPC STEPD STEPE
Hourly I $ 23.2149 $ 24.3755 $ 25.5942 $ 26.8740 $ 28.2178 -- - - -- - -··-. .... ·- - -- -··· - Bi-weekly $ 1,857 $ 1,950 $ 2,048 $ 2,150 $ 2,257 -- - - . •· - - Monthly $ 4,024 $ 4,225 $ 4,436 $ 4,658 $ 4,891 ·- - -· - - - ·---. -·- .... - Annual I$ 48,287 $ 50,701 $ 53,236 $ 55,898 $ 58,693 - Hourly $ 23.7952 j! $ 24.9851 $ 26.2341 $ 27.5457 $ 28.9231 Bi-weekly $- 1,904 $ 1,999- $- 2,099 $ 2,204 $ 2,314-
Monthl;- $ 4~125 T $. ·4,i31-- $- -4,547 ·-$ -4,775 . $. 5,01-3 An~-ual rf 49,494 i-$ 51,969 $ 54-,567 $ 5i:295 l'$ 60,160- f Hourly_ I $ __ 24.3_~~9 I ~ _25~60_96 _ ~ -~6.88~? ' $ 28.2346 j $ 2?:~~-~- Bi-weekly $ 1,951 -r $ 2,049 $ 2,151 $ 2,259 $ 2,372
Monthly l $ 4,228 $ 4,439 $ 4,661 $ 4,894 1 $ - -5,139
Annual $ 50,731 I $ 5i268 $ -55,931 I $ 58,728 $ 61,664 Hourly 1 $ 24.9995 $ 26.24951 $ 27.5620 l $ 28.9399 $ 30.3870 - ·- - - Bi-weekly I $ 2,000 $ 2,100 $ 2,205 $ 2,315 $ 2,431 Monthly I $ $ ~550 $ 4,111 I $- 5,016 - 4,333 $ 5,267
51,999 1 $ 54,599 1 $ - - Annual I $ 57,329 l $ 60,195 $ 63,205 - I Hoarly I $ 25.6245 l $ 26.9058 1 $ 28.2510 I $ 29~635 $ 31.1466 - - Bi-weekly I $ 2,050 $ 2, 152_ l $ 2,260 ~ 2,373 $ 2,492 - Executive Assistant/ Deputy City Clerk (FLSA Exempt) Senior Life Safety/ Code Officer
Monthly
Annual 1:
4,442 i $ 4,664 1 $
53,299 I $ 55,964 $
4,897 I $ 5,142 $ 5,399 - -
58,762 j $ 61,700 $ 64,785
Accountant (FLSA Exempt)
Assistant Planner
Facilities Supervisor (FLSA Exempt)
Human Resources Analyst
Management Analyst (FLSA Exempt)
1 Hourly J $ 26.2649 1 $ 27.5784 1 $ 28.9572 I $ 30.4053 I $ 31.9255 I Bi-weekl; ~ $ 2,101 1 $ 2,206 j $ 2,317 i $ 2,432 I$ ~,554- [ Monthly I $ 4,553 I $ 4,780 I $ 5,019 I $ 5,270 I $ 5,534 j Annual I $ 54,631 j $ 57,363 I $ 60,231 I $ 63,243 1 $ 66,405- I Hourly I
I Bi-weekly
I$ 26.9216 I$ 28.2678 1 $ 29.6813 I$ 31.1654 ! $ 32.7236 $ 2,154 [ $ 2,261 1 $ 2,315 $ 2,493 I $ 2,618
I Monthly I $ 4,666 j $ 4,900 ! $ 5,145 I $ 5,402 I $ 5,672 Annual I ! $ 55,997 1 $ 58,797 I $ 61,131 i $ 64,824 i $ 68,065 ! Hourly $ 27.5947 $ 28.9745 I $ 30.4231 $ 31.9442 I$ 33.5413 Bi-weekly 1$ 2,208 $ 2,318 $ 2,434 $ 2,556 I $ 2,683
Monthly $ 4,783 $ 5,022 $ 5,273 $ 5,537 I $ 5,814
Annual $ 57,397 $ 60,267 $ 63,280 $ 66,444 $ 69,766
RANGE
53-U
54-U
55-U
56-U
57-U
58-U
59-U
60-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION
Building Inspector II
Police Support Services Supervisor (FLSA Exempt)
Recreation Supervisor (FLSA Exempt)
Engineering Assistant

STEP A STEPB STEPC STEPD STEPE
! Hourly $ 28.28~ $ 29.6990 j $ 31.1841 $ 32.7433 I $ 34.3803 I I Bi-~~ekly :::i: t:
- .
$ 2,263 $ 2,376 I $ 2,495 $ 2,750
r ·-
. $ 4,903 r $ s:148 1 $ - ~-- --
l Monthly 5,405 $ 5,959
i" 58,832··1 $ -· 61 :774 $ °s"S,1O6 I$
. -.

Annual 64,863 $ 71,511
Ho~rly j $ 28.~918 $ 30.4~13 j $ 31.9635 I $ 33.5615 1 ~ 35.2394 Bi-weekly . $ 2,319 $ 2,435 j $ 2,557 l $ 2,685 $ 2,819 Monthly 1$·- 5,025 .$ 5,27·71s 5,540 t $ 5~817 J$ 6,108- I An~~al $ 60,303 l $ - 63~18 I $ 66,484 !"'$ 69-;i08 ,- $ . 73,298 . [ Hourly_ I ~-29.!16~ I $ _31.2029 1 $ 32.7630 j $ 34.40_10 I $ 36.1212 i Bi-weekly I $ 2,377 $ 2,496 $ 2,621 $ 2,752 I $ 2,890 I Monthly $ 5,151 l $ . 5:409 $ -5,679 $ 5:963 l $ 6,261 l Annual j $ 61,811 I $ 64,902 j $ 68,147 $ 71,554 I$ 75,132 . [ Hourly j ~ 30.4596 1 $ 31.9~27 l $ 33.5817 i ~ 35.~611 l $ 37.0240 _ : Bi-w_eekly I $ 2,437 $ 2.:559 $ 2!687 ~ $ 2,8~1 $ .. 2,962 I Monthly . $ 5,280 $ 5,544 $ 5,821 1 $ 6,112 $ 6,418
_____________ [, Annual 1 $ 63~356 1 $ 66,524 $ 69,850 J $ 73,3.43 $ 77,01-0 Associate Planner
City Clerk (FLSA Exempt)
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Human Resources Analyst (FLSA Exempt)
Senior Management Analyst (FLSA Exempt)
Hourly l $ 31.221~ $ 32.7822 $ 34.4212 $ 36.1423 j $ 37.9495 $ . ·2,891 t $ - -- Bi-weekly 1$ 2,498 $ 2,623 $ 2,754 3,036 Moothly j $ 5,412 $ 5,682 $ 5,966 $ 6,265 $ 6,578
Annual $ 64,940 J $ 68,187 $ 71,596 $ 75,176 $ 78,935
! Hourly J. $ 32.0019 1 $ 33.6019 j $ 35.2822 I $ 37.0462 $ 38.8986 ! Bi-weekly I $ 2,560 I $ 2,688 I $ 2,823 I $ 2,964 I $ 3,112 Monthly $ 5,547 I$ 5,824 $ 6,116 ! $ 6,421 $ 6,742
1 Annual 1 $ 66,564 1 $ 69,892 I $ 73,387 i $ 77,056 j $ 80,909 I Hourly I $ 32.8019 : $ 34.4418 j $ 36.1639 i $ 37.9721 I $ 39.8707 Bi-weekly , $ 2,624 I$ 2,755 ! $ 2,893 I $ 3,038 i $ 3,190 Monthly $ 5,686 $ 5,970 I$ 6,268 ! $ 6,582 I $ 6,911
Annual $ 68,228 j $ 71,639 I $ 75,221 $ 78,982 $ 82,931 i Hourly I $ 33.6221 ' $ 35.3034 $ 37.0688 $ 38.9221 $ 40.8683 Bi-weekly $ 2,690 1 $ 2,824 I$ 2,966 $ 3,114 $ 3,269
Monthly $ 5,828 $ 6,119 $ 6,425 $ 6,747 $ 7,084
Annual $ 69,934 $ 73,431 $ 77,103 $ 80,958 $ 85,006
RANGE
61-U
62-U
63-U
64-U
65-U
66-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION STEP A STEP B STEPC STEPD STEPE
Senior Accountant (F~SA Exempt) I Hourly $ 34.4625 $ 36.185~ I $ 37.9947 1 $ 39.8942 $ 41.8889 I - Senior Engineering Assistant (FLSA Exempt) Bi-weekly $ 2,757 $ 2,895 $ 3,040 $ 3,192 $ 3,351 - Monthly $ 5,974 $ 6,272 1 $ 6,586 $ 6,915 $ 7,261 ...

Annual $ 71,682 $ 75,266 $ 79,029 $ 82,980 I $ 87,129 .l.

City Clerk/ Executive Assistant (FLSA Exempt) Hourly $ 35.3240 $ 37.0904 $ 38.9447 $ 40.8918 $ 42.9365 - -· - Senior Planner (FLSA Exempt) Bi-weekly $ 2,826 $ 2,967 $ 3,116 $ 3,271 $ 3,435 - --·- - - . - -· ·- ....

Monthly $ 6,123 $ 6,429 · $ 6,750 $ 7,088 $ 7,442 ... - -··- s" 77,148 j $ .. 81,ci'o5- ...... - I Annual $ 73,474 $ 85,055 l $ 89,308
i
Hourly -1 $ 36.2~-~ I
I Bi-weekly $ 2,897 $ 3,041 $ 3,194 $ 3,353 $ 3,521
-
·- -·
$ 38:0178 $ 39.9188 1
1 $ 41~914:~ $ 44:.0106
-- ·-- - --- ... - -
Assistant Engineer (FLSA Exempt)
Assistant Water System Supervisor
Capital Projects/ Airport Manager (FLSA Exempt)
City Building Official (FLSA Exempt)
Public Works Manager (FLSA Exempt)
Fire Battalion Chief (FLSA Exempt)
I
i Monthly
l Annual
I Hourly
~
i Bi-weekly
I Monthly
Annual
l
I
I Hourly I
I
I Bi-weekly
j
I Monthly
Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
1 Monthly
Annual
$ 6,276 $ 6,590 $ 6,919 $ 1,265 I $ 7,629 - -·
$ 75,311 $ 19,011 I $ 83,031 $ 81,183 1 $ 91,542 - I
$ 37.1125
$ 2,969 ...
$ 6,433 -
l $ 77,194
$ 38.9683 f $ 40.916_8 $ 42.9625 1 $ 45.1106
$ 3, 11 ! I $ 3,273 $ .. 3,437 ,· $ 3,6_~9
$ 6,755 I $ 7,092 $ 7,447 $ 7,819
$ 81,054 1 $ 85,107 1 $ 89,362 ] $ 93,830
$ 38.0404 $ 39.9423 $ 41.9394 1 $ 44.0365 i $ 46.2385 - - $ 3,043 $ 3,195 $ 3,355 $ _ 3,523 : $ 3,699 - -
$ 6,594 [ $ 6,923 $ 7,270 $ 7,633 t $ 8,015
r $ 79,124 $ 83,080 $ 87,234 $ 91,596 I $ 96,176
: $ 38.99!_3 ! $ 40.9409
1 $ 42.9880 l $ 45.1375 ! $ 47.3942
, $ 3,119 I $ 3,275 , $ 3,439 1 $ 3,611 $ 3,792
I $ 6,759 1 $ 7,096 I $ 7,451 l $ 7,824 I $ 8,215
I $ 81,102 $ 85, 15.7 $ .89,415 $ 93,886 : $ 98,580
67-U Roads & Grounds Supervisor (FLSA Exempt) ! Hourly : $ 39.9663 I $ 41.9649 : $ 44.0630 J $ 46.2663 I $ 48.5798 68-U
Wastewater System Supervisor (FLSA Exempt)
Water System Supervisor (FLSA Exempt)
City Planner (FLSA Exempt)
Human Resources Manager (FLSA Exempt)
I
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
1$ 3,197 I $ 3,357 I $ 3,525 I $ 3,701 $ 3,886
$ 6,928 1 $ 7,274 $ 7,638 I $ 8,020 ! $ 8,421
: $ 83,130 : $ 87,287 $ 91,651 I $ 96,234 $ 101,046
. $ 40.9654 i $ 43.0135 I $ 45.1639 $ 47.4221 · $ 49.7933 $ 3,277 $ 3,441 ; $ 3,613 $ 3,794 $ 3,983
$ 7,101 $ 7,456 $ 7,828 $ 8,220 $ 8,631
$ 85,208 $ 89,468 $ 93,941 $ 98,638 $ 103,570
RANGE
69-U
70-U
71-U
72-U
73-U
74-U
75-U
76-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION
Accounting Manager (FLSA Exempt)
Associate Engineer (FLSA Exempt)
Police Lieutenant (FLSA Exempt)
City Engineer (Division Head FLSA Exempt)
Fire Chief (FLSA Exempt)
Community Services Director (FLSA Exempt)
I Hourly I
t
I Bi-weekly
I Monthly ..

Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
- Monthly
Annual I
1 Hourly
! Bi-weekly
, Monthly
I l Annual
! Hourly
! Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual

STEP A STEPB STEPC
1 $ 41.9894 f $ 44.0889 j $ 46.2933 .
$ 3,359 $ 3,527 $ 3,703
$ 7,278 I $ 7,642 t $ 8,024 . --- -r - $ 87,338 l $ 91,705 $ 96,290

STEPD STEPE
$ 48.6082 $ 51.0385
$ 3,889 $ 4,083 ..
$ 8,425 $ 8,847
$ 101,105 J $ 106,160
l $ 43.0389 $ 45.190~ ! $ 47.4505 J $ 49.8~~ $ 52.3144
1$ 3,443 $ !:~i;f 3,796 $ 3,986 $ 4,185 I. - - .. ..

I $ 7,460 $ 8,225 $ 8,636 $ 9,068 .. , -
I $ 89,521 $ 93,997 $ 98,697 $ 103,s°32 [ $ 108,814
: $ 44.1149 1 $ 46._32.01 j $ ~.6365 J $ 51.0683 $ 53.6216 __ $ 3,529 j $ 3,106 I $ 3,891 l $ 4,085 $ 4,290
I $ 7,647 $ 8~~29 I $ ·8,430 l $ 8,852 $ 9,294 .

I $ 91,759 j $ 96,347 I $ 101,164 1 $ 106,222 ! $ 111,533 ! $ 45.2178 1 $ 47.4788 1 $ 49.852.9 $ 52.3457 1 $ 54.9630 I $ 3,617 $ 3,798 $ 3,988 $ 4,188 $ 4,397
I $ 7,838 t $ 8,230 l $ 8,641 $ 9,073 I $ 9,527
I $ 94,053 L $ 98,756 $ 103,694 l $ 108,879 1 $ 114:323 I Hourly
1 $ 46.3481 f $ 48.6654 1 $ 51.0986 1 $ 53.6534_ $ 56.3361 Bi-weekly j $ 3,708 f $ 3,893 $ 4,088 $ 4,2_ 92 $ 4,507 Monthly $ 8,034 $ 8,435 $ 8,857 $ 9,300 $ 9,765
: Annual i $ 96,404 $ 101,224 $ 106,285 $ 111,599 $ 117,179 I Hourly
i
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
1 $ 47.5067 ~ $ 49.8~22 ! $ 52.3764 -~ $ 54.9952 I $ 57.7452 , $ 3,801 I $ 3,~91 ! $ 4,190 I $ 4,400 I $ 4,620
$ 8,235 $ 8,646 I $ 9,079 1 $ 9,533 1 $ 10,009
I $ 98,814 , $ 103,755 l $ 108,943 I $ 114,390 i $ 120,110 I $ 48.6942 j $ 51.1288 I ~ 53.6851 I $ 56.3692 l $ 59.1875 $ 3,896 · $ 4,090 : $ 4,295 ! $ 4,510 $ 4,735
I $ 8,440 ! $ 8,862 I $ 9,305 1 $ 9,771 I $ 10,259
$ 101,284 $ 106,348 ! $ 111,665 1 $ 117,248 ; $ 123,110 1 $ 49.9115 $ 52.4072 $ 55.0274 $ 57.7788 $ 60.6678
, $ 3,993 $ 4,193 $ 4,402 : $ 4,622 $ 4,853
$ 8,651 $ 9,084 I $ 9,538 $ 10,015 $ 10,516
$ 103,816 $ 109,007 $ 114,457 $ 120,180 $ 126,189
RANGE
77-U
78-U
79-U
80-U
81-U
82-U
83-U
84-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION STEP A STEP B STEPC STEPD STEP E
~ Hourly
I Bi-weekly
Monthly
r Annual
I$ 51.1591 t $ 5~.7173
$ 4,093 I $ 4,297
I $ 8,868 1 $ 9,311
J $ 106,411 $ 111 ,732
$ 56.4034 $ 59.2236 1 $ 62.1846 - $ 4,512 $ 4,738 $ 4,975 . - $ 9,777 $ 10,265 $ 10,779 - -
$ 117,319 $ 123,185 $ 129,344
I Hourly l $ 52.4380 $ 55.0601 I $ 51 .8130 $ 60.1038 I $ 63.7389 - -- . - Bi-weekly ' $ 4,195 $ 4,405 $ 4,625 $ 4,856 $ 5,099 r - .
-1- $ - ·- - -~ ... Monthly 9,089 $ 9,544 $ 10,021 $ 10,522 $ 11,048 I f $ 109,071 l $ 114,525 - . - .

Annual $ 120,251 $ 126,264 J $ 132,577
,,
I Hourly : $ 53.7490 j $ 56.4365 1 $ 5_9.2582 . $ 62.2~ 12 I $ 6~-~~22 .. i Bi-weekly $ 4,300 I $ 4,515
1 $ 4,741 $ 4,978 I $ 5,227 I ·• - Monthly t $ . 9,317 $ . 9:782 $ 10,271 $ 10:185 I$ 11,324 Annual $ 111,798-1 $ 117,388 i $ 123,257 $ 129,420 ~ $ 135,891 I I
'. $ 55.0928 l $ 57.8476 : $ 60.1399 j J 63.1169 I $ 66.~659 I Hourly I Bi-weekly ' $ 4,407 I $ 4,628 I$ 4,859 1 $ 5,102 j $ 5,357 Monthly 1 $ 9,549 I$ 10,027 $ 10,528 I $ 11,055 $ 11,607 - Annual : $ 114,593 t $ 120,323 I $ 126,339 l $ 132,656 $ 139,289 City Engineer (Department Head FLSA Exempt)
Community Development Director (FLSA Exempt) I Bi-weekly 1 Hourly : $ 56.4102 I $ 59.2938 j
1 $ 62.2581 $ 65.3116 I $ 68.6404 - r
Director of Finance & Administrative Services (FLSA Exempt) 1 Monthly [ $_ 4,518 I $ 4,744 $ 4,981 $ 5,230 l $ 5,491
$ 9,788 I $ 10,278 I $ 10,792 $ 11,331 1 $ 11,898
Police Chief (FLSA Exempt) $ 111,458 I $ 123,331 ! $ 129,498 I $ 135,973 $ 142,112 Public Works Director (FLSA Exempt)
Annual
I Hourly I $ 57.8817 I $ 60.7760 l $ 63.8149 l $ 67.0058 1 $ 70.~563 I
Bi-weekly $ 4,631 1 $ 4,862 ' $ 5,105 I $ 5,360 · $ 5,629 Monthly $ 10,033 $ 10,535 1 $ 11,061 I$ 11,614 j $ 12,195 j Annual $ 120,394 $ 126,414 $ 132,735 $ 139,372 $ 146,341 Hourly $ 59.3288 1 $ 62.2952 I$ 65.4101 I $ 68.6808 1 $ 72.1149 Bi-weekly 1 $ 4,746 I $ 4,984 I $ 5,233 : $ 5,494 I $ 5,769 Monthly $ 10,284 , $ 10,798 l $ 11,338 1 $ 11,905 $ 12,500 Annual $ 123,404 $ 129,574 ' $ 136,053 : $ 142,856 $ 149,999 Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
$ 60.8120 $ 63.8524 $ 67.0452 $ 70.3976 : $ 73.9173
$ 4,865 $ 5,108 $ 5,364 $ 5,632 $ 5,913
$ 10,541 $ 11,068 $ 11,621 $ 12,202 $ 12,812
Annual $ 126,489 $ 132,813 $ 139,454 $ 146,427 $ 153,748 RANGE
85-U
86-U
87-U
88-U
89-U
90-U
91-U
92-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION
Assistant City Manager (FLSA Exempt)

STEP A STEPB STEPC STEPD STEPE
Hourly $ 62.3322 $ 65.4490 $ 68.7216 $ 72.1577 $ 75.7654 ·- -----· .. -· ....... -- ·~ -- -- -- Bi-weekly $ 4,987 $ 5,236 $ 5,498 $ 5,773 $ 6,061 --···- .... -- . -- - ··---····· -··· ..

Monthly $ 10,804 $ 11,345 $ 11,912 $ 12,507 $ 13,133 - --- Annual $ 129,651 $ 136,134 $ 142,941 $ 150,088 $ 157,592 [ _ Ho~r~y··· .. $ __ 6_~8~ ?~ ~ 6~_-J_8~~ ·]· ~ 7?.·~~~4-i_$ _ ~3.9.~-~~1~---H ~6-~! 6 _ Bi-weekly $ 5,111 $ 5,367 $ 5,635 $ 5,917 $ 6,213 . -·- ·-- - - . - ·- .. .. - . - - - .... - ·- -·---~---·• ·- . .,,___ --~- Monthly $ 11,074 $ 11,628 ; $ 12,210 $ 12,820 $ 13,461 - - -· ·-- --·- -·- - .l - ... ---- - --·-·---- ...... - ·- ···- Annual $ 132,892 i $ 139,537 l $ 146,514 $ 153,840 $ 161,532 7 _ Ho~rly . I $ ~-5.4875_.]_ $ 68. 7620 $ 72.20~~ $ 75.8101 $ 79.6005 ! ~ ~wee_~ly_ I ~- _ 5,239 [ ~ 5!..501 I. $ 5,!7~ $ ... ·--~'.~6-~ --~---· ?:3_68 I Monthly ! $ 11,3_51 ; $ 11,919. i $ 12,515_ $ 13~~4_0 $ 13,797 j Annual [ $ 136,214 1 $ 143,025 1 $ 150,176 $ 157,685 $ 165,569 Hourly · 1 $ 67.1245 i $ 70.4808 I $ 74.0048 j $ 77.7053 $ 81.5904 . - - .. . -- -· ... -I - . -· -·· . - .. -· ·- Bi-weekly I $ 5,370 $ 5,638 i $ 5,920 $ 6,216 $ 6,527
Mont~!~ ~ f 11~635 $ 12,217 I $ 12,828 .. $ 13,46·9- $ 14,142.

Annual l $ 13.9,619 $ 146,600 I $ 153,930 . $ 161,627 $ 169,70-8 - Hou~ly : $ 68.8~~4 ! $ 72.~~~3 t $ _75.8543 ! --~9.6~1 . -~ 83.6293 Bi-weekly l ~ 5,50~ j $ 5,779 1 $ ~,06~ $ 6,372 $ 6,690 Monthly I $ 11,926 ! $ 12,522 ] $ 13,148 $ 13,806 $ 14,496 Annu~I i $-143,109 I $ 150,264 ! $ 157,777 $ 165,666 $ 173,949 Hourly
I Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
! $ 70.5226_: $ 74.0486 j $ 77.7510 I $ 81.6385 [ ~-85! 202 . $ 5,642 I $ 5,924 j $ 6,220 I $ 6,5~1 $ 6,858 .
i $ 12,224 ; $ 12,835 , $ 13,477 l $ 14,151 $ 14,858
' $ 146,687 I $ 154,021 ; $ 161,722 l $ 169,808 $ 178,298 ' J 1 $ 12.2856 I $ 15.9000 1 $ 7~.6952 l $ 83.6798 $ 87.8639 . I 1$ 5,783 1 $ 6,072 ; $ 6,376 I $ 6,694 $ 7,029 ' $ 12,530 i $ 13,156 l $ 13,814 r $ 14,505 I $ 15,230 I $ 150,354 I $ 157,872 $ 165,766 I $ 174,054 ! $ 182,757 $ 7 4.0928 I $ 77. 7976 $ 81.6875 $ 85. 7721 I $ 90.0606 $ 5,927 : $ 6,224 $ 6,535 $ 6,862 $ 7,205
$ 12,843 $ 13,485 $ 14,159 $ 14,867 $ 15,611
$ 154,113 $ 161,819 $ 169,910 $ 178,406 $ 187,326
RANGE
93-U
94-U
CM-U
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Unrepresented Positions

POSITION
City Manager (FLSA Exempt)

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
I Hourly j $ 75.9452 I $ 79. 7 423 1 $ 83. 7293 r $ 87 .9159 l $ 9~.31~ 5 ..

I Bi-weekly j $ 6,076 $_ .. 6,379 l $ 6,698 ! $ 7,033 1 $_ 7,3.8~ 1 Monthly I $ 13,164 $ 13,822 1 $ 14,513 I $ 15,239 1 $ 16,001 i Annual l $ 157,966 $ 165,864 . $ 174:157 1 $ 182,865 $ 192,00.8 i ___ Hourly II $ 77.8438 1 ~ 81.! 361 J $ --~5-~~31 1 $ 90:_1144 _ $_ 94.620_2.

I ~i-weekly $ 6,228 $ __ ~,539 j $ 6,866 $ 7,209 $ 7 ~~7_0 · Monthly 1 $ 13,493 I$ 14,168 j $ 14,876 $ 15,620 $ 16,401 I Annual 1 $ .161,915 1 $ 170,011 l $ 178,512 1 $ 187,438 I $ 196,81-0 Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
$ 95.3870
$ 7,631
$ 16,534
$ 198,405
RANGE
36-P
37-P
38-P
39-P
40-P
41-P
42-P
43-P
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Reedley Public Safety Association "RPOA"

POSITION
Police Records Specialist
Community Services Officer
Dispatcher I
Animal Control Officer
Dispatcher II
Senior Community Services Officer
Non-Sworn Positions
Hourly
Bi-weekly
- .. ,
Monthly
- Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
$ 18.6808 ..
$ 1,494
..
$ 3,238
$ 38,856
$ 19.6149 I $ 20:~~57 ·I $ 21.6255 j $ 22. 7067
$ 1,569 1 $ ~,648 $ . 1,130 l $ 1,~!1
$ 3,400 $ 3,570 l $ 3,748 I $ 3,936
$ 40,799 t $ 42:83.9 $ 44,98-1 t $ 47,230-
' $ 19.1478 _I $ 20.10~3 I $ 21.~106 j $ 22.1663 1 $ 23.2745 __ $ 1,532 I$ 1,608 1 $ \ 68~ _ i $ _1,7!3 j $ 1,8~2 __ $ 3,319 1 $ 3,485 $ 3,659 J $ 3,842 $ 4,034
· ·$ 39,821 t $ 41,819 $ 43,910 I $ 46,106 I $ 48,411
I Hoorly t $ 19.6265 : $ 20.6077 1 $ 21.~380 I $ 22.7197 1 $ 23.8558 I Bi-weekly $ 1,510 I $ 1,649 I $ 1,731 I $ 1,818 l $ 1,908 I I Monthly ; $ 3,402 I $ 3,572 $ 3,751 ; $ 3,938 $ 4,135
t Annual 1$ 40,823 I $ 42,864 ! $ 45,007 j $ 47,257 1 $ 49,620 I
Hourly I $ 20.1111 1 $ 21.1231 I $ 22.1193 1 $ 23.2885 1 $ 24.4529 Bi-weekly $ 1,609 I $ 1,690 i $ 1,114 I $ 1,863 $ 1,956 Monthly $ 3,487 ! $ 3,66_1 [ $ ~.'._844 l $ 4,037 $ 4,239 --- 41,844 'I $ ·- ..

I Annual $ 43,936 1 $ 46,133 $ 48,440 $ 50,862
I Hourly $ 20.6201 I $ 21.6510 I $ 22.7337 I $ 23.870~ I $ 25.0639 I Bi-weekly $ 1,650 I $ 1,732 I $ 1,819 I $ 1,910 I $ 2,005 Monthly 1$ 3,574 I $ 3,753 I $ ~,941 J $ 4,138 j $ 4,344 '
l Annual [ $ 42,890 . $ 45,034 $ 47,286 I $ 49,650 I$ 52,133 I Hourly j $ 21.1356 I $ 22.1923 I $ 23.3019 1 $ 24.4668 I$ 25.6904 I Bi-weekly I $ 1,691 ' $ 1,775 I $ 1,864 I $ 1,957 $ 2,055 I Monthly l $ 3,664 $ 3,847 I $ 4,039 I $ 4,241 I $ 4,453 Annual $ 43,962 I $ 46,160 $ 48,468 I $ 50,891 $ 53,436 '
I Hourly I $ 21.6640 : $ 22.7471 I $ 23.8846 I $ 25.0788 I $ 26.3327 , Bi-weekly , $ 1,733 I $ 1,820 $ 1,911 $ 2,006 $ 2,107 Monthly , $ 3,755 $ 3,943 $ 4,140 $ 4,347 $ 4,564
Annual $ 45,061 $ 47,314 $ 49,680 $ 52,164 $ 54,772
I 1
$ 22.2056 , $ $ $ I
Hourly 23.3159 24.4817 25.7058 $ 26.9909
Bi-weekly $ 1,776 $ 1,865 $ 1,959 $ 2,056 $ 2,159
Monthly $ 3,849 , $ 4,041 $ 4,244 $ 4,456 $ 4,678
Annual $ 46,188 $ 48,497 $ 50,922 $ 53,468 $ 56,141
RANGE
44-P
45-P
46-P
47-P
,,
48-P
49-P
50-P
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Reedley Public Safety Association "RPOA"

POSITION
Police Records & Com Supervisor
Non-Sworn Positions
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
-·- Monthly
-· - .. Annual
I Hourly
f
Bi-weekly
- Monthly
I Annual
f Hourly
1 Bi-weekly
1 Monthly
l Annual
1 Hourly
I Bi-weekly
I Monthly
r I Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual

STEP A STEPS STEPC STEPD STEPE
$ 22.760'.~ $ 23.8986 1 $ - 25.0933 _ $ 2~.3481 [ $ 27.6654 _ $ 1,821 $ 1,912 $ 2,007 $ 2,108 l $ 2,213 --·· . j $ 3,945 $ 4,142 $ 4,350 $ 4,567 1 $ 4,795 $ 47,342 $ 49,709 $ 52,194 $ 54,804 $ 57,544
$ 23.3297 $ 24.4962 $ 25.~212 I $ 27.0072 l $ _28.3577 - -· $ 1,866 $ 1,960 $ 2,058 $ 2,161 I $ 2,269 - ' ·-·- -- 4,681 r $ - 4,915- $ 4,044 $ 4,246 $ 4,458 $ 50,952 1 $ - $ 48,526 $ 53,500 I $ 56,175 j $ 58,984
I $ 23.9130 1· $ 25.1081 1 $ 26.3639 l $ 21.682_2 1 $ 29.0663 i $ !:913 _ $ 2,009 j $ 2,}09 I $ 2,215 1 $ _ 2,325
1 $ 4,145 $ 4,352 1 $ 4,570 I $ 4,798 $ 5,038 ! $ 49,739 1 $ 52,226 [ $ 54,837 I i 57,579 ·1 $ 60,458 I $ 24.5108 t $ 25.7365 I $ 21.0236 I $ 28.3745 I $ 29.7933 $ 1,961 I $ 2,059 $ 2,162 j $ 2,210 ; $ 2,383
$ 4,249 t $ 4,461 $ 4,684 f $ 4,918 l $ 5,164
$ 50,982 $ 53,532 $ 56,209 1 $ 59,019 $ 61,970
I $ 25.1236 I $ 26.3798 1 $ 27.6990 ! $ 29.0841 I $ 30.538~ j $ 2,010 I $ 2,110 $ 2,216 I $ 2,327 , $ 2,443
I $ 4,355 : $ _ 4,513 [ $ ~,801 i $ 5,041 1 $ 5,293
; $ 52,257 I $ 54,_870 j $ 57,614 1 $ 60,495 $ 63,520
I $ 25.1511 I $ 21.0394 I $ 28.3913 1 $ 29.8111 I $ 31.3014 , $ 2,060 1 $ 2,163 • $ 2,211 r $ 2,385 , $ 2,504
$ 4,464 l $ 4,687 1 $ 4,921 I $ 5,167 l $ 5,426
I $ 53,563 I $ 56,242 I $ 59,054 ! $ 62,007 $ 65,107
I $ 26.3954 I $ 27.7154 I $ 29.1010 I $ 30.5563 I $ 32.0841 $ 2,112 I $ 2,217 $ 2,328 ; $ 2,445 $ 2,567
$ 4,575 $ 4,804 $ 5,044 $ 5,296 $ 5,561
$ 54,903 $ 57,648 · $ 60,530 $ 63,557 $ 66,735
RANGE
50-P
51-P
52-P
53-P
54-P
55-P
56-P
57-P
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Reedley Public Safety Association "RPOA"

POSITION
Police Officer
Police Corporal
Sworn Positions

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEPE
I Hourly I $ 26.7784 $ 28.1173 $ 29.5231 I $ 30.9990
l Bi-weekly I $ 2,142 $ 2,249 $ 2,362 t $ 2,480
$ 32.5490
$ 2,604
1 Monthly · I $4:·642___ $ _ .. 4,874 $ 5,117 j $ 5,373 f Annual $ 55,699 1 $ 58,484 $ 61,408 $ 64,478
$ 5,642
$ 67,702
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
J Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I $ 21.~476 __ $ 28.8202 $ 30.2611 I $ 31.11_~0 l $ __ 33.3~3_o [ $ 2,196 $ 2,306 $ 2,421 $ 2,542 $ 2,669 -- . - I $ 4,758 $ 4,996 $ 5,245 $ 5,508 $ 5,783 1$ - .
57,091 $ 59,946 $ 62,943 $ 66,090 I $ 69,395
! $ 28.1337 .l $ 29.5404 I $ 31.0173 I $ 32.568~ I $ 34.1966 $ 2,251 l $ 2,363 1 $ 2,481 I $ 2,605 l $ 2,736
I $ 4,877 , $ 5,120 I $ 5,376 1 $ 5,645 1 $ 5,927
1$ 58,518 : $ 61,444 1 $ 64,516 $ 67,742 1 $ 71,129
I $ 28.8370 I $ 30.2788 j $ 31.79~8 I $ 33.3822 l $ 35.0514 , $ 2,307 l $ 2,422 ! $ 2,543 . $ 2,671 I $ 2,804 -
' $ 4,998 4 $ 5,248 t $ 5~511 .l $ 5,786 f $ 6,076 I. - . ! $ 59,981 $ 62,980 l $ 66,129 I $ 69,435 $ 72,907
I $ 29.5582 j $ 31.0361 I $ 32.5880 I $ 34.2173 I $ 35.9284 ' $ 2,365 [ $ 2,483 1 $ 2,607 [ $ 2,737 I $ 2,874
, $ 5,123 1 ~ 5,380 $ 5,649 1 $ 5,931 l $ 6,228
, $ 61,481 $ 64,555 ! $ 67,783 $ 71,172 $ 74,731 I
$ 30.2971 I $ 31.8120 I $ 33.4024 I $ 35.0126 I $ 36.8264 $ 2,424 I $ 2,545 1 $ 2,672 I $ 2,806 $ 2,946
$ 5,252 I $ 5,514 I $ 5,790 I$ 6,079 I $ 6,383
$ 63,018 I $ 66,169 $ 69,477 I $ 72,951 $
I 76,599
$ 31.0543 I $ 32.6072 I $ 34.2375 I $ I 35.9495 $ 37.7471 $ 2,484 $ 2,609 $ 2,739 I $ 2,876 $ 3,020
$ 5,383 $ 5,652 $ 5,935 I $ 6,231 $ 6,543
$ 64,593 $ 67,823 $ 71,214 I $ 74,775 $ 78,514
$ 31.8308 I
$ 33.4221 . $ 35.0933 I$ 36.8481 I $ 38.6904
$ 2,546 $ 2,674 $ 2,807 I $ 2,948 $ 3,095
$ 5,517 $ 5,793 I $ 6,083 $ 6,387 $ 6,706
$ 66,208 $ 69,518 $ 72,994 $ 76,644 $ 80,476
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Reedley Public Safety Association "RPOA"
Sworn Positions

RANGE POSITION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
58-P : Hourly 1
1 $ 32.6264 i $ 34.2577 jl $ 35.9707 $ 37.7692 ! $ 39.6577 Bi-weekly $ 2,610 $ 2,741 $ 2,878 $ 3,022 $ 3,173
I Monthly $ 5,655 $ 5,938 $ 6,235 $ 6,547 I $ 6,874 ! Annual l $ 67,863 $ 71,256 $ -74,819 .$ . -78,560 1· $ 8£488 59-P Police Sergeant I Hourly I $ 33.4423 1 $ 35.1144 j $ 36.8702 I $ 38.7139 j $ 40.6495 1 Bi-weekly $ 2,675 '. $ 2,809 I $ 2,950 I $ 3,097 1 $ 3,252 , Monthly J $ 5,797 I $ 6,087 I $ -6,391 I $ 6,710 I $ 7,046 J Annual I $ 69,560 J $ 73,038 $ 76,690 $ 80,525 I $ 84,551 EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
General Services Unit

RANGE POSITION STEP A STEPB STEPC STEPD STEPE
28-G I Hourly ! 15.2303 1 $ 15.9918 1 $ 16.7913 $ 17.6308 1 $ 18.5125 - I
Bi-weekly $ 1,218 I $ 1,219 I $ 1,343 $ 1,410 $ 1,481
Monthly $ 2,640 I $ 2,772 1 $ 2,911 $ 3,056 l $ 3,209 -- Annual $ 31,679-l $ 33,263 $ 34,926 $ 36,672 1 $ 38,506 29-G
f
Hourly I: 15.6111 ~- 16.3918 ! $_ 17.2115 $ 18.0721 $ 18.9760 Bi-weekly 1,249 I $ 1,311 1$ 1,377 $ 1,446 $ 1,518
Monthly I $ 2,706 $ 2,841 I $ 2,983 $ 3,133 $ 3,289 I - . 34,095 1 $ - 37,590 1 $ - .. I
J 1$ Annual ~2,471 i $ 35,800 $ 39,470
30-G I Hourly 1$ 16.0014 : $ 16.8014 l $ 17.6413 I $ 18.5236 I $ 19.4495 Bi-weekly $ 1,280 $ 1,344 J $ ·1,411 I$ ~ 1,482 1 $ 1,556 I Monthly $ 2,774 : $ 2,912 I $ 3,058 j $ 3,211 $ 3,371 Annual 1$ 33,283 $ 34,947 l $ 36,694 .. $ 38,529 I $ 40,455 31-G I Hourly I $ 16.4014 : $ 17.2216 I $ 18.0827 I $ 18.9870 I $ 19.9365 I $ 1,312 1 $ 1,378 l $ _1,447 _ $ 1,519 $ - Bi-weekly 1,595 - Monthly 1$ 2,843 $ 2,985 $ 3,134 : $ 3,291 $ 3,456 l Annual 1$ 34,115 ; $ 35,821 l $ 37,612 j $ 39,493 $ 41,468 32-G Parks Maintenance Worker I I Hourly -~ $ 16.8115 $ 17.6519 I $ 18.5346 I $ 19.4615 1 $ 20.4346 I Bi-weekly 1 $ 1,345 ; $ 1,412 I $ 1,483 1 $ 1,551 ·I $ 1,635 I Monthly I $ 2,914 i $ 3,060 l $ 3,213 1 $ 3,373 $ 3,542 Annual $ 34,968 ' $ 36,716 ! $ 38,552 1 $ 40,480 I $ 42,504 33-G Hourly I $ 17.2317 1 $ 18.0933 ' $ 18.9981 I $ 19.9481 ! $ 20.9457 Bi-weekly 1$ 1,379 $ 1,447 $ 1,520 ; $ 1,596 I $ 1,676
Monthly $ 2,987 I $ 3,136 I $ 3,293 $ 3,458 I $ 3,631
Annual 1$ 35,842 $ 37,634 , $ 39,516 $ 41,492 1 $ 43,567 34-G Maintenance Worker I (Water, WWTP, Streets) I Hourly i $ 17.6625 $ 18.5457 $ 19.4731 $ 20.4466 : $ 21.4688 I Water System Utility Worker Bi-weekly $ 1,413 $ 1,484 $ 1,558 ! $ 1,636 I $ 1,718 WWTP Maintenance Worker Monthly $ 3,062 $ 3,215 $ 3,375 $ 3,544 $ 3,721 Annual $ 36,738 $ 38,575 $ 40,504 $ 42,529 I $ 44,655
35-G I Hourly $ 18.1038 ' $ 19.0091 $ 19.9596 $ 20.9577 $ 22.0058 I Bi-weekly $ 1,448 $ 1,521 $ 1,597 $ 1,677 $ 1,760
Monthly $ 3,138 $ 3,295 $ 3,460 $ 3,633 $ 3,814
Annual $ 37,656 $ 39,539 $ 41 ,516 $ 43,592 $ 45,772
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
General Services Unit

RANGE POSITION STEP A STEPB STEPC STEPD STEPE
36-G Parks Maintenance Worker II I Hourly 1$ 18.5563 $ 19.4841 $ 20.4582 $ 21.4813 1 $ 22.5553 WWTP Operator Trainee f Bi-weekly 1$ I 1,485 $ 1,559 $ 1,637 $ 1,719 $ 1,804 I 1 $ 3,216 $ 3,377 $ 3,546 $ 3,723 $ 3,910 I Monthly l Annual I $ 38,597 I $ 40,527 I $ 42,553 1 $ 44,681 $ 46,915 37-G I Hourly : $ 19.0202 I $ 19_9112 I $ 20.9697 j $ 22.0183 I $ 23.1192 I Bi-weekly I $ 1,522 I $ 1,598 ] $ 1,6!8 . $ 1,1~1 { $ - 1,830 I I
Monthly $ 3,297 $ 3,462 I $ 3,635 j $ 3,817 t $ 4,007
I Annual , $ 39,562 r $ 41~540 r $ 43,617 $ 45,798 $ 48,088 38-G Maintenance Worker II I Hourly I $ 19.4957 I $ 20.4707 1 $ 21.4942 i $ 22.5688 1 $ 23.6971 Bi-weekly $ 1,560 I $ 1,638 , $ 1,720 $ 1,806 $ 1,896
! $ r Monthly 3,379 1 $ 3,548 I $ 3,726 I $ 3,912 l $ 4,108 I $ 40,551 I $ 42,579 1 $ i 46,943 $ I Annual 44,708 I $ 49,290 .
39-G Hourly I $ 19.9832 I $ 20.9822 j $ 22.0313 I $ 23.1321 I $ 24.2894 i I f . Bi-weekly $ 1,599 t $ 1,619 I $ 1 __ , 763 $ 1,8~_1 $ 1,943 Monthly $ 3,464 I $ 3,637 : $ 3,819 I $ 4,010 $ 4,210
Annual 1$ 41,565 j $ 43,643 1 $ 45,825 : $ 48,116 $ 50,522 40-G Senior Parks Maintenance Worker I Hourly I $ 20 .4827 I $ 21.5067 j $ 22.5822 ! $ 23. 7115 ! $ 24.8971 Water Systems Specialist I I Bi-weekly ; $ 1,639 $ 1,721 I $ 1,807 l $ 1,8~7 $ 1,992 WWTP Operator I i Monthly I $ 3,550 $ 3,728 $ 3,914 1 $ 4,110 I $ 4,316 WWTP Operator-In-Training / Lab Tech Trainee : Annual I $ 42,604 j $ 44,734 1 $ 46,971 I $ 49,320 $ 51,786 41-G Hourly 1$ 20.9947 I $ 22.0442 '. $ 23.1466 1 $ 24.3038 1 $ 25.5192 Bi-weekly $ 1,680 I $ 1,764 I $ 1,852 $ 1,944 I $ 2,042 Monthly $ 3,639 $ 3,821 $ 4,012 I $ 4,213 I $ 4,423
Annual $ 43,669 $ 45,852 $ 48,145 $ 50,552 $ 53,080
42-G Senior Maintenance Worker I Hourly $ 21.5197 $ 22.5957 $ 23.7255 $ 24.9115 1 $ 26.1572 Sewer Collection System Maintenance Worker Bi-weekly $ 1,722 i $ 1,808 , $ 1,898 $ 1,993 $ 2,093 Monthly ! $ 3,730 I $ 3,917 $ 4,112 $ 4,318 l $ 4,534
Annual $ 44,761 $ 46,999 $ 49,349 $ 51,816 $ 54,407
43-G I Hourly $ 22.0577 · $ 23.1606 ·$ 24.3188 $ 25.5346 , $ 26.8115 Bi-weekly $ 1,765 $ 1,853 $ 1,946 $ 2,043 $ 2,145
Monthly $ 3,823 $ 4,015 $ 4,215 $ 4,426 $ 4,647
Annual $ 45,880 $ 48,174 $ 50,583 $ 53,112 $ 55,768
RANGE
44-G
45-G
46-G
47-G
48-G
49-G
50-G
51-G
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
General Services Unit

POSITION
Water Systems Specialist II
WWTP Operator II
WWTP Operator/ Lab Tech
Equipment Mechanic
Environmental Compliance Officer
Senior Sewer Collection System Maintenance Worker
Senior Water System Specialist
WWTP Operator II/ Lab Technician
WWTP Operator Ill
Heavy Equipment Mechanic
Senior Environmental Compliance Officer
r
l Hourly
Bi-weekly
l Monthly
Annual
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual

1. Hourly
Bi-weekly
I Monthly
I Annual
I Hourly
I Bi-weekly
I Monthly
-------~--~' Annual
I Hourly
1 Bi-weekly
i Monthly
I Annual
I Hourly

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
I $ 22.6091 I $ 23.7394 I $ 24.9264 I $ 26.1726 I $ 27.4813 I $ 1,809 , $ 1,899 r $ 1,994 1 $ 2,094 $ ·· 2,199
. $ 3,919 r $ 4,115 1 $ 4,321 I $ 4,537 $ 4,763
I $ 41,021 : $ 49,378 I $ 51,847 1 $ 54,439 $ 57,161
I $ 23.1745 I $ 24.3332 1 $ 25.5500 _I $ 26.8274 l $ 28.1688 l $ 1,854 I $ 1,947 1 $ 2,0~4 l $ 2,146 I$ 2,254
l ~ 4,01 ! l $ 4,~18 1 $ 4,~?9 -I $ 4,650 j $ 4,883 -
[ $ 48,203 I $ 50,613 $ 53,144 $ 55,801 j $ 58,591
I $ 23.7538 I $ 24.9413 1 $ 26.1885 $ 27._4981 I $ 28.87~1 - $ 1,900 l $ 1,995 :· $ 2,095 $ _ 2,2_00 1 $ 2,310
! $ 4,111 ; $ 4,323 I $ 4,s39 $ 4,766 1 $ s,oos
$ 49,408 : $ 51,878 ] $ 54,472 $ 57,196 I $ 60,056
I $ 24.3476 I $ 25.5649 ! $ 26.8433 1 $ 28.1856 1 $ 29.5947 $ 1,948 $ 2,045 L $_ 2,147 $ 2,255 J $ 2,368
I $ 4,220 . $ 4,431 I $ 4,653 $ 4,886 $ 5,130
I $ 50,643 I $ 53,175 J $ 55,834 I $ 58,626 I $ 61,557
I $ 24.9563 I $ 26.2038 1 $ 27.5139 I $ 28.8894 1 $ 30.3341 l $ 1,997 I $ 2,096 j $ 2,201 $ 2,311 I $ 2,427 j $ 4,326 1 $ 4,542 1 $ 4,769 1 $ 5,008 $ 5,258
i $ 51,909 1 $ 54,504 [ $ 57,229 ; $ 60,090 ] $ 63,095
$ 25.5803 ; $ 26.8591 I $ 28.2019 $ 29.6120 $ 31.09~8
Bi-weekly i $ 2,046 $ 2,149 $ 2,256 $ 2,369 $ 2,487
Monthly 1 $ 4,434 1 $ 4,656 $ 4,888 $ 5,133 $ 5,389
Annual $ 53,207 $ 55,867 $ 58,660 $ 61,593 $ 64,673
I Hourly $ 26.2197 $ 27.5308 $ 28.9072 $ 30.3524 , $ 31.8702 Bi-weekly $ 2,098 $ 2,202 $ 2,313 $ 2,428 1 $ 2,550
' Monthly $ 4,545 $ 4,772 ' $ 5,011 $ 5,261 $ 5,524
Annual $ 54,537 $ 57,264 $ 60,127 $ 63,133 $ 66,290
1 Hourly $ 26.8750 I $ 28.2188 $ 29.6298 1 $ 31.1115 $ 32.6673 Bi-weekly $ 2,150 $ 2,258 $ 2,370 $ 2,489 $ 2,613
Monthly $ 4,658 $ 4,891 $ 5,136 $ 5,393 $ 5,662
Annual $ 55,900 $ 58,695 $ 61,630 $ 64,712 $ 67,948
RANGE
52-G
53-G
54-G
55-G
56-G
57-G
58-G
59-G
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
General Services Unit

POSITION
Electrician
Electrician II
Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
I Hourly
I Bi-weekly
Monthly
I
I Annual
I Hourly
Bi-weekly
I Monthly
I Annual

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
_$_ 21.5411 l $ . 28..:9?45 \ $ 30.3101 $ 31.8894 $ 33.4841 $ 2,204 I $ 2,314 $ 2,430 $ 2,551 $ 2,679
$ 4,7!5 ~ $ 5,014 I $ 5,264 I $ 5,528 $ 5,804 .
$ 57,298 i $ so,163 I $ 63,111 1 $ 66,330 I $ 69,647
I $ 28.2356 $
l $$ 2,25~ . $
I 4,894 $
I $ 58,130 1 $

29.6476 $ 31.1298 I $ 32.6865 1 $ 34.3207
2,372 $ _ 2,490 l $ 2,6} 5
1 _$ 2,746 _
5,139 $ 5,396 $ 5,666 $ 5,949
61,667 1 $ 64,750 .. l $ 67,988 $ ·- 11~387
I $ 28.9413 : $ 30.3885 I $ 31.9077 1 $ 33.5029 j $ 35.1779 I $ 2,315 1 $ 2,431 : $ 2,553 t $ 2,680 I $ 2,814 .

I $ 5,017 $ 5,267 $ 5,531 1 $ 5~807 1 $ 6,098 -
j $ 60,198 ] $ 63,208 1 $ 66,368 ! $ 69,_686 f $ 73,170 j $ 29.6649 $ 31.1~81 l $ 32.7053 I $ 34.3404 I $ 36.0572 $ 2,373 [ $ 2,492 $ 2,616 I $ 2,747 ] $ 2,885-
t $ 5,142 J $ 5,399 I $ 5,669 I $ 5,952 1· $ 6,250-
1 $ 61,703 I $ 64,788 ' $ 68,027 $ 71,428 $ 74,999
I Hourly I $ 30.4067 I $ 31.9269 I $ 33.5231 1 $ 35.1990 I $ 36.9591 I Bi-weekly ! $ 2,433 I $ 2,554 j $ 2,682 1 $ 2,8_16 1 $ 2,957 _ Monthly j $ 5,271 I $ 5,534 $ 5,811 : $ 6,101 $ 6,406
Annual ~ $ 63,246 1 $ 66,408 I $ 69,728 $ 73,214 ] $ 76,875 I Hourly ' $ 31.1668 1 $ 32.7250 $ 34.3611 i $ 36.0793 1 $ 37.8832 1 Bi-weekly $ 2,493 1
$ 2,618 $ 2,749 $ 2,886 $ 3,031
Monthly $ 5,402 , $ 5,672 ; $ 5,956 $ 6,254 I $ 6,566
Annual $ 64,827 $ 68,068 $ 71,471 $ 75,045 $ 78,797
Hourly : $ 31.9462 1 $ 33.5433 1 $ 35.2207 $ 36.9817 $ 38.8308 Bi-weekly $ 2,556 I $ 2,683 $ 2,818 $ 2,959 $ 3,106
Monthly I $ 5,537 $ 5,814 $ 6,105 $ 6,410 $ 6,731
Annual $ 66,448 $ 69,770 $ 73,259 $ 76,922 $ 80,768
Hourly $ 32.7447 , $ 34.3817 $ 36.1010 $ 37.9063 $ 39.8014 Bi-weekly $ 2,620 1 $ 2,751 $ 2,888 $ 3,033 $ 3,184
Monthly $ 5,676 ' $ 5,960 $ 6,258 $ 6,570 $ 6,899
Annual $ 68,109 $ 71,514 $ 75,090 $ 78,845 $ 82,787
RANGE
60-G
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
General Services Unit

POSITION
Electrician Ill I Hourly
I Bi-weekly
Monthly
Annual
STEP A STEP 8 STEP C STEP D STEP E
l $ 33.5635 $ 3s.241~ I $ 31.0038 $ 38.8538 1 $ 40.7966 I $ 2,685 $ ~,819 I $ 2,960 $ 3,108 1 $ 3,264
l $ 5,818 $ 6,109 i $ 6,414 $ 6,735 I $ 7,071
! $ 69,812 1 $ 73,303 1 $ 76,968 I $ 80,816 r $ 84,857
EXHIBIT "A"
Salary Table
Part-Time Employees

DEPT POSITION PAY FREQUENCY-PAY RANGE-SPECIAL TERMS
Elected Officials
Council I Council member ! Monthly I Stipend I$ 150.00 I .

Community Services - Adult Sports Programs
CSD I Adult Sports Field / Court Monitor
I
Hourly I$ _ 15.oo l Range Depending Upon Qualification I$ 17.00 .. - - - .. .. .. .. -· i $ - CSD Adult Sports Scorekeeper Hourly I $ 15.oo I Range Depending Upon Qualification 17.00 CSD I Adult Sports Umpire/ Referees (Paid Per Game) I Per Game 1$ 20.00 f Range Depending Upon Qualification 1$ 35.00 Community Services - After School Programs
CSD ! After School Assistant Site Coordinator Hourly J $ 16.~o I Range Depending Upon Qualifications I$ 20.00 - - . -· CSD i After School Literacy Coordinator Hourly l $ 1~.00 l Range Depending Upon Qualifications 1$ 20.00 CSD I After School Recreation Leader Hourly $ 15.00 I Range Depending Upon Qualifications 1$ 18.00 I .. - I - - CSD I After School Site Coordinator I Hourly I $ 19.00 I Range Depending Upon Qualifications i $ 28.00 Community Services - Aquatics Programs
CSD Aquatics Lead Guard Hourly I$ 15.00 ; Range Depending Upon Qualifications 1$ 18.00 ...

CSD I Aquatics Lifeguard 1~.00 I I$ I Hourly , $ Range Depending Upon Qualifications 18.00 CSD Aquatics Senior Guard I Hourly $ 15.00 1 Range Depending Upon Qualifications ' $ 19.00 CSD I Aquatics Manager I Hourly : $ i 15.00 : Range Depending Upon Qualifications I$ 19.00 Community Services - Enrichment Programs
CSD Enrichment Recreation Leader I Hourly $ 15~0~ : Range Depending Upon Qualifications ' $ 18.00 I ..

CSD Enrichment Site Coordinator Hourly $ 15.00 Range Depending Upon Qualifications $ 18.00 Program Instructor I
CSD Program 70% of Program Revenue (i.e. Tumblinglnstructor, Oance lnstructor,etc.) I CSD I Tiny Tots Recreation Leader 1 Hourly $ 15.00 ' Range Depending Upon Qualifications $ 18.00 I CSD Recreation Assistant I Hourly , $ 15.00 J Range Depending Upon Qualification i $ 18.00 Community Services - Preschool Program
CSD Preschool Teacher I Hourly $ 16.00 . Range Depending Upon Qualifications $ 20.00 $ .•• I
CSD Preschool Teachers Aide I : $ Hourly 15.00 i Range Depending Upon Qualifications 18.00 Community Services - Youth Sports Programs
CSD i Youth Sports Field/ Court Monitor I ' $ 15.00 ' 1$ 18.00 l Hourly Range Depending Upon Qualifications CSD Youth Sports Scorekeeper Hourly $ 15.00 I Range Depending Upon Qualifications $ 18.00 CSD Youth Sports Umpire/ Referees (Paid Per Game) I Hourly $ 15.00 Range Depending Upon Qualifications ; $ 18.00 Community Services - Other Part-Time Positions
CSD Community Center Event Coordinator Hourly $ 15.00 ' Range Depending Upon Qualifications $ 18.00 CSD River Cashier Hourly $ 15.00 Range Depending Upon Qualifications $ 18.00 DEPT
Fire
Police
Police
Police
Police
All Dept's
All Dept's
I
I
I
r
I
Public Works
Public Works I
All Dept's
EXHIBIT"A"
Salary Table
Part-Time Employees
POSITION PAY FREQUENCY~ PAY RANGE~ SPECIAL TERMS
Fire Department - Part-Time Positions
Assistant Life Safety/ Code Officer I Hourly I $ 16.00 I Range Depending Upon Qualification Police Department - Part-Time Reserve Positions
Contract Reserve Officer (40 hours per week) Hourly I * Ties to 50-P for Police Officer for RPOA Schedule I Reserve Officer Hourly
Reserve Community Service Officer Hourly ! $ 15.00 I
Reserve Dispatcher Hourly $ 20.00
Part-Time Positions in Multiple Departments
Office Assistant I Hourly I $ 15.00 I
Laborer J Hourly I $ 15.00 I
Equipment Operator
Mechanic Assistant
Public Works - Part-Time Positions
J Hourly I $ 17.00 !
Hourly 1 $ 15.00 I
Part-Time Retired Annuitants
CalPERS Retired Annuitants (TBD by Job Duties) 1 Hourly I $ 15.00 ! Range Depending Upon Minimum Wage
Range Depending Upon Qualification
J.

Range Depending Upon Qualifications
Range Depending Upon Qualification
Range Depending Upon Qualification
Range Depending Upon Qualification
Range Depending Upon Qualifications
•.

J$ 21.00
! $ 26.7784
' $ i $
$

20.00 18.00

35.00 20.00

20.00 24.00

20.00 26.00
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-096

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

ESTABLISHING A SALARY & BENEFIT SCHEDULE FOR UNREPRESENTED

EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, Section 36506 of the Government Code of the State of California provides that the City Council shall, by Resolution or Ordinance, fix the compensation for all appointive officers and employees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore by Resolution established salary and benefit schedules for management, and all other unrepresented employees of the City ("Unrepresented Group").

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Reedley as follows:

ARTICLE 1:

SECTION 1:

The Master Salary Table is adopted by separate resolution which includes the salaries and ranges for the Unrepresented Group. The salaries or rates of compensation are fixed on the basis of fulltime service and full-time positions, unless otherwise designated.

SECTION 2:

1. Vacation

2. 3.

4. Beginning on the effective date of this Resolution, employees who have reached the maximum accrued vacation amount of 320 hours shall not accrue additional vacation until the vacation leave accrual falls below the maximum amount.

Bilingual Pay
The sum of $80.00 per month shall be paid to those employees who demonstrate their ability to speak a language beneficial to the City business as approved by the City Manager. The sum of $100.00 per month shall be paid to those employees who demonstrate their ability to speak, read and write in a language beneficial to the City business as approved by the City Manager and/or his/her designee.

Notary Pay
Employees who are commissioned by the State of California as a Notary Public may receive a 1.0% of base pay incentive if need of their commission is beneficial to City business as approved by the City Manager.

Certification Pay
Employees who maintain an active status as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) or Certified Public Finance Officer (CPFO) designation may receive a 3.0% of base pay incentive if their certification is beneficial to City business as approved by the City Manager.

5. Cell Phone Stipend
On approval of the City Manager, employees with duties that require the use of a cell phone may receive a monthly stipend rather than a City-provided device so that a single device may be used for both personal and business purposes. Employees with duties that generally only require use of voice (call) and text features may receive a $50.00 monthly stipend; whereas employees whose duties also require access to e-mail, calendar and data applications may receive a $125.00 monthly stipend. The stipend will be considered taxable income to the employee. Employees receiving the stipend must comply with all applicable laws pertaining to the Public Records Act.

6. Safety Boots
On approval of the City Manager, employees whose positions require a majority of their time to be spent working where safety is a concern or direct supervision of employees in the General Services Unit (GSU), may receive a reimbursement for the purchase of safety boots up to the amount as set forth in the current GSU Memorandum of Understanding.

Reimbursements are made upon request and shall not occur more than once per fiscal year.

7. Uniform Allowance
A. Public safety employees covered by this resolution shall receive a uniform allowance of $1,200 per year, payable prospectively in one installment on the first pay period ending in July. If the employee leaves employment prior to June of the following year, the prorated overpayment for the fiscal year will be deducted from the employee's final pay based on the number of months left in the fiscal year.

B. All Life Safety/Code Officer Positions: Annual rate of $1,200 per year, payable prospectively in one installment on the first pay period ending in July. If the employee leaves employment prior to June of the following year, the prorated overpayment for the fiscal year will be deducted from the employee's final pay based on the number of months left in the fiscal year.

8. Vehicle Allowance - Executive Management

9. 10.

A. $500.00 per month in lieu of a take-home City vehicle. Per IRS regulation, the allowance will be considered taxable income to the employee, and is at the discretion of the City Manager.

B. The City Manager and Assistant City Manager shall receive $800.00 per month in lieu of a take-home City vehicle. This section shall revise the monthly car allowance amount listed in Section 6. Automobile Allowance in the City Manager Employment Agreement dated August 22, 2011.

Salary & Stipends
Employees shall receive a 5.0% COLA effective July 1, 2022.

Longevity Pay
Employees who have completed service milestones may receive longevity pay based on their cumulative full-time years of service. Longevity pay shall be pensionable and considered base pay for purposes of calculating other employment benefits and special compensation. Benefit tiers shall be as follows:

Resolution No. 2022-096 2
• Beginning at year 10, 5.0% of base salary
• Beginning at year 15, 7.5% of base salary
• Beginning at year 20, 10% of base salary
SECTION 3: Benefit Schedule for Management Employees

1. Management Group Designation by Job Title
a.
b.

Executive Management*
Assistant City Manager
Chief of Police
City Clerk/ Executive Assistant to the City Manager
City Engineer (Department Head)
Community Development Director
Community Services Director
Fire Chief
Public Works Director
The Executive Management positions are FLSA Overtime Exempt, at-will department heads appointed by the City Manager and are part of the Unclassified Service as provided in the Personnel Policies and Procedures.

Mid-Management*
Accounting Manager
Accountant
Assistant Engineer
Assistant Water System Supervisor
Battalion Chief
Building Official
Capital Projects / Airport Manager
City Engineer (Division Head)
City Planner
Facilities Supervisor
Management Analyst
Police Lieutenant
Police Support Services Supervisor
Public Works Manager
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Supervisor
Roads and Grounds Supervisor
Senior Accountant
Senior Citizen Coordinator
Senior Human Resources Analyst
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Planner
Water System Supervisor
Wastewater System Supervisor
*The titles above do not reflect filled , vacant or frozen status. Except as otherwise indicated, these positions are FLSA Overtime Exempt positions Resolution No. 2022-096 3

2. Benefit Schedule for Management Employees
a. Executive Management
1) Leave
a) Administrative - 10 days/fiscal year; cannot be accumulated or carried over from fiscal year-to-year. Administrative Leave for new hires shall be prorated based on full quarters left in the fiscal year.

Upon receiving a positive annual performance evaluation, Executive Management staff may receive up to three additional days at City Manager's discretion.
b) Vacation - Accrual of vacation time based upon:
12 days/year for the first two years
13 days/year beginning with the 3rd year
14 days/year beginning with the 4th year
15 days/year beginning with the 5th year
16 days/year beginning with the 6th year
17 days/year beginning with the 7th year
18 days/year beginning with the 8th year
19 days/year beginning with the 9th year
20 days/year beginning with the 10th year
At the City Manager's discretion, vacation accrual for Executive and Mid-Management positions may include credit for prior public agency service.
c) Vacation Buy-back - The City encourages employees to use earned vacation time. However, circumstances may arise in which an employee does not use accrued vacation time. Employees may have up to eighty (80) hours of accrued vacation time bought back by the City. Employees are limited to two (2) buy-backs per fiscal year, not to exceed 80 hours. To be eligible for vacation buy-back, an employee must have an accrued vacation balance of at least 120 hours after the buy-back. Any employee choosing to participate in this benefit shall provide the City with at least 14 days advance written notice.
d) Sick - Accrual of sick leave time at the rate of 12 days/year. e) Funeral - Three days paid leave/year as approved by the City Manager.
f) Holidays
New Year's Day
Martin Luther King , Jr. Day
Washington's Birthday
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veteran's Day
Resolution No. 2022-096 4
Thanksgiving Day
Friday after Thanksgiving
Christmas Eve
Christmas Day
Floating Holiday (must be used annually on a fiscal basis by June 30th or lost)
Admission Day Floating Holiday cannot be accumulated or carried over from calendar year-to-year.

Paid holidays falling on a Saturday shall be observed on the preceding Friday. Paid holidays falling on a Sunday shall be observed on the following Monday.
2) Health and Welfare
Resolution No. 2022-096
a) Medical - City shall maintain medical coverage and shall pay the average of the two lowest premium plans of the employee and qualified dependent care premiums. The amount of the medical plan premium that exceeds the City's maximum contribution amount shall be the responsibility of the employee to pay through payroll deductions.
b) Dental - City shall provide and maintain current dental coverage and benefits through an authorized provider. City will pay 100% of premium for employees & dependents.
c) Vision - City shall provide and maintain current vision coverage through an authorized provider. City will pay 100% of premium for employees & dependents.
d) Life
e)
f)
g)
h)
i. The City shall maintain a Life Insurance policy that is equal to the employee's annual base salary, as adopted on the Master Salary Table (rounded to the nearest $1,000) including
applicable Longevity Pay, for an Unrepresented employee whose base salary exceeds $50,000
ii. The City shall maintain a Life Insurance policy that is equal to $50,000 for an Unrepresented employee whose base salary is less than or equal to $50,000
Long-Term Disability - 100% of premium paid by City.

Unemployment - In accordance with State law.

Worker's Compensation - In accordance with State law.

Cash-In-Lieu of Benefits Option
Employees may voluntarily enroll in the Cash-In-Lieu of Benefits program if they have alternative medical, dental, or vision coverage not provided by the City. The program will run from January 1st to December 3pt annually. Employees will receive monthly in-lieu payments as taxable income and reflected in 5 b.
withholding contributions on their paycheck. Employees may be eligible to re-enroll in City benefit plans only during the Open Enrollment period or within 30 days of: Family Unit change due to marriage, birth, or adoption; Loss of other coverage; Court or administrative order; Reemployment after Military service.

Cash-in-Lieu amounts will be set at $300.00 per month for medical, $40.00 per month for dental, and $10.00 per month for vision coverage. Employees must re-enroll and show proof of alternative coverage annually.
3) Retirement
a) Social Security - In accordance with Federal law. City shall only pay 100% of the employer contribution. The employee contribution shall be deducted from the employee's paycheck.
b) CalPERS 'Classic' Members - Employees defined by CalPERS as 'Classic' members shall have a 2.0% @ Age 55 Miscellaneous and 3% @ 55 for Safety group employees tier retirement packages with the California Public Employees Retirement System
(Cal PERS). 'Classic' members shall pay 100% of the 'employee' member-paid pension contribution rate as a percentage of payroll, as set by CalPERS.
c) CalPERS PEPRA Members - PEPRA members shall have a 2.0% @ Age 62 miscellaneous tier retirement package with CalPERS, and shall be responsible for payment of their member contribution rate as a percentage of payroll. CalPERS will review the member rate once a year when the actuarial valuation of the City's plan is performed. Should CalPERS revise the member contribution at any time, the City shall comply with law by adjusting contribution rates of new members.

Mid-Management
1) Leave - Same benefits as those listed above for Executive Management, with the exception of:
a) Mid-Management FLSA Exempt Employees - Administrative Leave, five days/fiscal year; cannot be accumulated or carried over from fiscal year-to-year. Administrative Leave for new hires shall be prorated based on full quarters left in the fiscal year. Upon receiving a positive annual performance evaluation, Mid-Management staff may receive up to two additional days at supervisor's recommendation to the City Manager, who shall have final approval authority.
2) Health and Welfare - Same benefits as those listed above for Executive Management.
3) Retirement - Same benefits as those listed above for Executive Management.

Resolution No. 2022-096 6
SECTION 4: All Other Unrepresented Employees *

1. All Other Unrepresented Employees Designation by Job T_itle Accounting Technician I
Accounting Technician II
Administrative Assistant
Assistant Planner
Associate Planner
Building Inspector I
Building Inspector II
Building Permit Technician
CAD Technician
Community Development Technician
Engineering Assistant
Engineering Technician
Executive Assistant
Human Resources Analyst
Human Resources Technician
Life Safety I Code Officer
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Engineering Assistant (FLSA Overtime Exempt)
Senior Life Safety / Code Officer
Staff Assistant
*These positions are FLSA Overtime Non-Exempt positions unless specifically designated as FLSA Overtime Exempt.

2. Benefit Schedule for All Other Unrepresented Employees a. Leave - Same benefits as those listed above for Executive Management, except as follows:
1) All Other Unrepresented Employees (FLSA Overtime Exempt) - Administrative Leave, 5 days/fiscal year; cannot be accumulated or carried over from fiscal year-to-year. Administrative Leave for new hires shall be prorated based on full quarters left in the fiscal year.

Unrepresented employees in this category, upon receiving a positive annual performance evaluation, may receive up to one additional day of Administrative Leave at supervisor's recommendation to the City Manager, who shall have final approval authority.
2) All Other Unrepresented Employees (FLSA Overtime Non-Exempt) - No Administrative Leave, except that upon receiving a positive annual performance evaluation, employees in this category may receive up to one day of Administrative Leave at supervisor's recommendation to the City Manager, who shall have final approval authority.
3) All Other Unrepresented Employees (FLSA Overtime Non-Exempt) - Accrual of Comp Time, capped at 80 hours, or Overtime pay at 1.5 times the hourly rate for time worked in excess of a 40-hour workweek. b. Health and Welfare - Same benefits as those listed above for Executive Management.

Resolution No. 2022-096 7
c. Retirement - Same benefits as those listed above for Executive Management.

ARTICLE 2: The salary and benefits outlined herein shall remain in effect beginning January 1, 2023 unless modified or repealed by resolution. All prior resolutions concerning compensation or benefits for the Unrepresented Group which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

This foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted this 13th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2022-096 8
Side Letter Agreement to the Memorandum of
Understanding Between the City of Reedley and Reedley Police Officers Association
The City of Reedley_ao_d the Reedley Police Officers Association mutually agree to the following changes in the 2022-2024 Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Reedley and the Reedley Police Officers Association ("MOU"). Effective December 21, 2022, Article 14 of the MOU will be amended to include the following paragraph:

ARTICLE 14. SPECIALTY PAY
h. Sworn employees designated and actively assigned by the Police Chief to the Fresno County Adult Compliance Team shall receive Specialty Pay of an additional five percent (5%) per hour compensation beyond their regular base salary as set forth in the salary resolution adopted by the City Council. Only one sworn employee may be assigned this Specialty Pay, and Sergeants shall not be eligible.

All other provisions and language of Article 14 shall remain in effect.

The parties agree that this Side Letter Agreement shall be effective December 21 st, 2022.

CITY OF REEDLEY
By:----------
NICOLE R. ZIEBA
City Manager
ATTESTED:

By:----------

RUTHIE GREENWOOD
City Clerk

REEDLEY POLICE OFFICERS

ASSOCIATION
By· ~_, ez~
-~RYEAR
President
Jt /'f

MINUTES

REEDLEY AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING
Thursday , July 14, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.

1. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the Reedley Airport Commission was held at the Reedley Community Center, 100 N. East Avenue, Reedley , California and called to order by Carl Smith at 04:35 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL AND INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
A. Commissioners Present: Carl Smith , Chairperson ; Butch Agrifoglio ; Vice Chairperson; Anthony Jewell, Matt Cochran, Joseph Oldham B. Staff Present: Sarah Reid , Airport Manager; Kayla Cheney, Administrative Ass istant C. Others Present: Micah Ruff

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Motion by Commissioner Jewell, seconded by Commissioner Cochran to approve the May 19, 2022 Airport Commission minutes. Motion carried . 4 . PUBLIC DISCUSSION - None

5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Airport BBQ October 1, 2022 Planning - Reid shared with the Commission the City is moving forward with the Apron Reconstruction Project construction project, and it's projected to begin after Labor Day. Reid shares her concern is being knee deep in construction when the barbeque is scheduled to happen . Commissioner Smith shared to postpone the barbeque. Commissioner Jewell makes motion to hold off on the 2022 barbeque considering the construction maybe going on at the time of the annual airport barbeque, this motion was seconded by Commissioner Oldham.

Motion Carried.

B. Reedley College Flight Science Operations Transition to Reedley Municipal Airport- Reid shared staff met with Reedley College and talked about the agreement language for hangar 3. Full fees are to be paid for any tiedown space, hangar space, as well as the square foot of the classroom space. Reedley College has taken ownership of the hangar. Planes have been ordered which will be coming in the next months. Mid fall semester or spring semester, we will see more activity out at the airport. Commissioner Jewell stated they have ordered 6 planes .

6. AIRPORT MANAGER REPORT
A. Capital Improvements - The water line has been moved to the end of the short hangar where the restroom will be located . In the near future the Ag well will come out; the fencing , as well as the old pump. The trees are already dying , Reid will be getting quotes on the 20 aces of oranges .

B. Weed Control - There are weeds a street sweeper came through and cleaned things up on the tiedown area which really made a difference .

C. Landscaping/Parking - None
D. Public Relations/Airport Promotion - The next newsletter will be sent out August or September.

E. BMX Track - They are doing good financially . They had two big events; they are very active.

F. Hangar Vacancies - Two hangar tenants were not compliant with the certificate of insurance so the City attorney got involved . Both tenants did get compliant. But at least now we know the process on how to proceed if this situation occurs aga in. - 1 -

MINUTES

REEDLEY AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING
Thursday , July 14, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.

G. Electric Planes/Charging Station - Still operating the electric planes . Commissioner Oldham stated they are being used for taxi training for the students coming in to the training program since they cannot go up flying , but they can be taught to taxi the airplanes , which Commissioner Oldham stated is a great learning opportun ity for the students.

7. ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further business to discuss , it was moved by Commissioner Jewell. seconded by Commissioner Cochran to adjourn at 5:08 p.m.
~-->2---=-- ::.:r-- Carl Smith , Chairperson
- 2 -

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D ClosedSession
D Public Hearing
1:8] Receive/Review
DATE:

ITEM NO: /5
December 13, 2022
TITLE: RECEIVE, REVIEW, & FILE 2021-22 AUDITED CITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUBMITTED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant Ci:~er ,k,,__-
Lori Oken, Accounting Managlf
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive, review and file the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City has received an "Unmodified" audit report for its financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, with no findings. An audit report is said to be unmodified when the Auditor concludes that the Financial Statements give a true and fair view in accordance with the financial reporting framework used for the preparation and presentation of the Financial Statements. An Auditor gives a 'Clean' opinion or Unmodified Report when they do not have any significant reservation in respect of matters contained in the Financial Statements.

This type of report is issued by an auditor when the financial statements presented are free of material misstatements and are represented fairly in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), which in other words means that the entities' financial condition, position, and operations are fairly presented in the financial statements. It is the best type of report an auditee may receive from an external auditor.

An Unmodified Report indicates the following :
• The Financial Statements have been prepared using the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles which have been consistently applied;
• The Financial Statements comply with relevant statutory requirements and regulations; • There is adequate disclosure of all material matters relevant to the proper presentation of the financial information subject to statutory requirements, where applicable; • Any changes in the accounting principles or in the method of their application and the effects thereof have been properly determined and disclosed in the Financial Statements.

ATTACHMENTS
Auditor Management Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 Audited Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022

CITY OF REEDLEY

MANAGEMENT REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022

TABLE OF

CONTENTS
Required Communications 1 - 3
2 BRYANT L.JOLLEY

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Reedley, California
Bryant L.Jolley C.P.A.

Ryan P.Jolley C.P.A.

Darryl L Smith C.P.A.

Luis A. Perez C.P.A.

Lan T. Kimoto
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental actlv1t1es, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Reedley for the year ended June 30, 2022. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards and, if applicable, Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information in our letter to you dated October 24, 2019. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit.

Significant Audit Findings
Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by City are described in Note 1 to the financial statements.

The City adopted a new accounting policy to comply with the effects of GASB Statement No. 87, Leases and the application of existing policies was not changed during 2022. We noted no transactions entered into by City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period.

Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the City's financial statements were:
• Management has dete1mined the economic useful lives of fixed assets based on past history of similar types of assets, future plans as to their use, and other factors that impact their economic value to the City. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management in computing depreciation expense and believe that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
• Management's estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on an evaluation of collectability primarily focused on past due accounts. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance for doubtful accounts in dete1mining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements as a whole. 901 "N" STREET, SUITE 104 FIREBAUGH, CALIFORNIA 93622 PHONE 559.659.3045 FAX 559.659.0615 • Management's estimate of the net pension liability and related deferrals is based on actuarial valuations which include significant assumptions regarding discount rate, inflation, payroll growth, projected salary increases and investment rate of return. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the liability and related deferrals in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.

Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management m performing and completing our audit.

Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole.

Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of the audit.

Management Representations
We have requested certain representations from management that are included m the management representation letter dated December 7, 2022.

Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to City of Reedley's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.
2 Other Audit Findings or Issues
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as City of Reedley's auditors.

However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention.

Other Matters
We applied certain limited procedures to the Budgetary Comparison Schedules, Schedule of Changes in the City's Net OPEB Liability and Related Ratios, Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability, and Schedule of Contributions which are required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.

We were engaged to report on supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.

Restriction on Use
This infmmation is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council and management of City of Reedley and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties.
3 CITY OF REEDLEY

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
AND

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2022

CONTENTS

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

Government-Wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Position
Statement of Activities
Fund Financial Statements
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds
Reconciliation of Total Governmental Fund Balance to
Net Position of Governmental Activities
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance - Governmental Funds
Reconciliation of Statement of Revenue, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds
to the Statement of Activities
Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds
Statement of Revenue, Expense and Changes in Fund Net
Position - Proprietary Funds
Statement of Cash Flow - Proprietary Funds
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Custodial Funds
Statement of Changes to Fiduciary Net Position - Custodial Funds Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Private Purpose Trust Fund Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Private Purpose Trust Fund Notes to Basic Financial Statements
1-3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12-13
14 15
16 17
18- 52
C O NT E N T S (Continued)
Required Supplementary Information
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - American Rescue Plan Special Revenue Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Development Impact Fees Capital Project Fund Schedule of Changes in the City's Net OPEB Liability and Related Ratios Schedule of the City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability Schedule of Contributions
Supplemental Only Information
Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor
Governmental Funds
Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Nonmajor
53 54
55 56
57 58
59- 61
Governmental Funds 62 - 64
Schedule ofNet Revenue Available for Debt Service 65

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER

MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING STANDARDS 66 - 67

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR

EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE 68 - 70
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Summaiy Schedule of Prior Audit Findings
71 72
73 74
BRYANT L.JOLLEY

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Reedley, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
Bryant L.Jolley, C.P.A.

Ryan P.Jolley C.P.A.

Darryl L Smith C.P.A.

Luis A Perez C.P.A.

Lan T. Kimoto
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Reedley (the "City"), California, as ofand for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2022, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered matetial if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements. 901 "N" STREET, SUITE 104 FIREBAUGH, CALIFORNIA 93622 PHONE 559.659.3045 FAX 559.659.0615 In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements. • Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.

Required Supplementary Information
Management has omitted the management's discussion and analysis that accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinions on the basic financial statements are not affected by this missing information.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the budgetary comparison information on pages 53-55, the schedule of changes in the City's Net OPEB liability and related ratios on page 56, the schedule of the City's proportionate share of net pension liability on page 57, and the schedule of contributions on page 5 8, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the inf01mation for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

Supplementa,y Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The accompanying combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, the schedule ofrevenue available for debt service, and schedule of expenditures of federal awards, as required by Title 2 U.S.

Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such inf01mation directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic fmancial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. 2 Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 7, 2022, on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance.

That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. 3 CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2022
Prima!)'. Government
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 19,079,949 $ 7,034,550 $ 26,114,499 Accounts receivable (net of allowance) 53,299 140,553 193,852 Due from other governments 3,065,387 23,069 3,088,456
Prepaid expense 6,000 6,000
Inventory 17,323 425,691 443,014
Restricted assets-cash 1,103,800 1,103,800
Capital assets, net of allowance
for depreciation 56,355,525 47,490,294 103,845,819
Total assets 78,571,483 56,223,957 134,795,440
DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES 3,902,362 419,636 4,321 ,998

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 672,015 677,699 1,349,714
Interest payable 168,898 168,898
Retention payable 7,329 7,329
Deposits 379,472 379,472
Long-term liabilities:

Due within one year
Revenue bonds payable 1,471,000 1,471,000
Due in more than one year
Revenue bonds payable 26,056,731 26,056,731
Compensated absences 489,227 144,470 633,697
Net pension liability 8,181,110 821,947 9,003,057
Net OPEB liability 5.233.554 1.124.018 6.357.572
Total liabilities 14,583,235 30,844,235 45,427,470
DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 8,124,706 1,136,793 9,261,499

NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets 56,355,525 19,793,665 76,149,190 Restricted for:

Public ways and facilities 3,740,202 3,740,202
Public safety programs 1,142,059 1,142,059
Community services 42,321 42,321
Capital projects and in1provements 5,432,353 1,103,800 6,536,153 Unrestricted {6,946,556) 3,765,100 {3,181,456)
Total net position $ 59,765,904 $ 24,662,565 $ 84,428,469 See accompanying notes. 4

CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Functions/Programs
Primary Government
Governmental activities
Public safety
Public ways and facilities
Community services
Administrative and fmance
Community development
Debt Service
Interest expense
Total governmental activities
Business-type ac tivities
Water
Sewer
Disposal
Airport
Total business-ty pe activities
Total primary government
General Revenue
Sales and use taxes
Property taxes
Franchise and other taxes
Business License
Insurance refunds and other
Rents
Ga in/(loss) on dis posal of assets
Unrestricted investment eamings/(unrealized losses)
T ransfer in/(out), net
Total general revenue
Change in Net Position
Net Position
Beginning of year
End ofyear
See accompanying notes.
$
$
Program Revenue
Operating
Charges for Grants and
Expense Services Contributions
7,526,207 $ 265,379 $ 3,343,028
5,342,316 555,082 2,866,907
2,484,247 333,737 968,194
4,913,924
1,062,433 762,707 45,799
617
21,329,744 1,916,905 7,223,928
3,317,959 4,105,861 337,320
4,897,142 5,796,375
1,053,219 1,823,643 2,179
505,706 125,921 126,420
9,774,026 11 ,85 1,800 465,919
31,103,770 $ 13,768,705 $ 7,689,847
Net Revenue/(Expense) and
Changes in Net Position
Capital
Grants and Governmental Business-Type
Contributions Activities Activities Total
$ $ (3,917,800) $ - $ (3,917,800)
2,692,668 772,341 772,341
(1 , 182,316) (1,182,316)
(4,913,924) (4,913,924)
3,902 (250,025) (250,025)
{617) {617)
2,696,570 {9,492,341) {9,492,341)
1,125,222 1,125,222
899,233 899,233
772,603 772,603
(253,365) (253,365)
2,543,693 2,543,693
$ 2,696,570 $ {9,492,341) $ 2,543,693 $ {6,948,648)
6,683,584 6,683,584
5,053,982 6,028 5,060,010
1,234,456 1,234,456
I 18,014 118,014
588,549 157,515 746,064
48,536 92,854 141 ,390
37,469 17,574 55,043
(603,601) (206,408) (810,009)
490,347 (490,347)
13,651,336 (422,784) 13,228,552
4,158,995 2,120,909 6,279,904
55,606,909 22,541,656 78,148,565
$ 59,765,904 $ 24,662,565 $ 84,428,469
5 CITY OF REEDLEY

BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
Seecial Revenue Fund Caeital Project Fund
American l)cvclopmcnt Non-Major Total
Rescue Plan Impact Governmental Governmental
General Act Fees Funds Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 5,395,669 $ 972,885 $ 4,020,740 $ 8,580,887 $ 18,990, 181 Accounts receivable 53,069 53,069
Due from other governments 2,026,192 284,873 754,322 3,065,387 Due from other funds 133,213 133,213
Total assets $ 72-608, 143 $ 972,885 $ 4,305,613 $ 9,335,209 $ 22,221,850

LIABJLITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense 360,715 5,332 161 234,166 600,374 Retention payable 7,329 7,329
Due to other funds 133,213 133,213
Total l.iab iJities ___ 3_60,715 5,332 161 374,7_08 _____ _E_0~916 Fund Ba la nee
Restricted
Public ways and fa cilities 3,740,202 3,740,202
Public safety programs 1,142,059 1,142,059
Community services 42,321 42,321
Capital projects and improvements 967,553 4,305,452 159,348 5,432,353 Assigned 219,852 219,852
Unassigned 7,027,576 3,876,571 10,904,147
Total fund balance 1247 428 267 553 4 305 452 8 260 501 21480234 Total liabLlities and fund balance $ 7,608,143 $ 972,885 $ 4,305,613 $ 9,335,209 $ 22,221 ,850 See accompany ing notes. 6

CITY OF REEDLEY

RECONCILIATION OF TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCE TO NET POSITION

OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
JUNE 30, 2022
Total governmental fund balance
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because:

Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the governmental funds $
Deferred outflows of resources related to net pension liability and OPEB, represent a consumption of net position or fund balance that applies to future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow ofresources (expenses) until that tirne
Compensated absences are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds
Net pension liability applicable to governmental activities are not due and payable in the cmrent period and accordingly is not reported in the governmental funds
Post-retirement health benefits are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported in the governmental funds Deferred inflows of resources related to net pension liability and OPEB, represent an acquisition of net position or fund balance that applies to future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow ofresources (revenue) until that tirne
The internal service fund is used to charge the costs of automotive equipment activities to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service fund are included in governmental activities in the statement of net position
Net position of governmental activities
See accompany ing notes.
$
21 ,480,934
55,888,645
3,902,362
(471 ,769)
(8,181,110)
(5,233,554)
(8,124,706)
505,102
59,765,904
7 CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Spec ial Revenue Fund Capital Pro ject Fund
American Development Non-Major Total
Rescue Plan Impact Governmental Governmental
General Act Fees Funds Funds
Revenue
Intergo vemmental $ 1,215,140 $ 3,068,969 $ - $ 1,283,752 $ 5,567,861 Taxes 10, 150,877 4,953,420 15,104,297
Charges for services 1,122,758 20,216 1,142,974
License, permits and impact fees 891,945 2,223,962 3,115,907 Other 552,991 29,343 582,334
Investment, rent income, and unrealized losses 067,533) (110,806) (272,867) (551,206) Total revenue 13,766,178 3,068,969 2,113,156 6,013,864 24,962,167 Expenditures
Current
General government 1,823,237 16,204 1,839,441
Public ways and facilities 1,279,695 712,476 134,215 1,623,450 3,749,836 Community services 1,841,630 1,841,630
Pub lie Safety 6,331,111 3,008 1,141, 104 7,475,223
Community development 904,968 232,578 1,137,546
Capital Outlay 698,354 1,354,141 312,500 1,539,188 3,904,183 Debt Service
Principal 69,343 69,343
Interest and :fiscal charges 325 325
Total expenditures 12,948,663 2,066,617 449,723 4,552,524 20,017,527 Revenue over/(under) expenditures 817,515 1,002,352 1,663,433 1,461,340 4,944,640 Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Proceeds from sale of assets 20,261 17,208 37,469
Transfers in/(out), net 303,644 (207) (25,003) (1 ,030,797) 052,363) Total other financing sources/(uses) 323,905 (207) (25,003) (1 ,013,589) (714,894) Change in ]i' und Balance l , 141,420 1,002,145 1,638,430 447,751 4,229,746 Fund Ba la nee
Beginning of year 6,106,008 (34,592) 2,667,022 8,512,750 17,251,188 End of year $ 7,247,428 $_ 967,553 $ 4,305,452 $ 8,960,501 $ 21,480,934 See accompanying notes. 8

CITY OF REEDLEY

RECONCILIATION OF STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN

FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITES YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Net change in fund balance - total governmental funds
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:

Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities the cost of those assets is capitalized and allocated over their estimated lives and reported as depreciation expense Capital outlay expenditures are therefore added back to fund balances Depreciation expense not reported in governmental funds Repayment of capital lease payable is an expenditure in governmental funds, but the repayment reduces capital lease payable liabilities in the statement of net position.

Compensated absence costs in the Statement of Activities does not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the Governmental Funds
Pension expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the Governmental Funds
Post-retirement benefit costs in the Statement of Activities does not require the use of cmTent financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the Governmental Funds Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of fleet maintenance to individual funds. The net revenue (loss) of certain activities of internal service funds is reported with governmental activities
Change in net position of governmental activities
See accompanying notes.
3,904,183
(1,815,059)
$ 4,229,746
2,089,124
69,343
(70,395)
(594,369)
(1 ,445,216)
(119,238)
$ 4,158,995
9 CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
Business-Tn~e Activities-Enteq:~rise Funds Governmental Total Activities
Nonmajor Enteq~rise Funds Business- Internal
ASSETS Water Sewer Disposal Airport Type Funds Service
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,005,783 $ 4, 169,061 $ 756,371 $ 103,335 $ 7,034,550 $ 109,768 Accounts receivable 29,884 75,414 35,255 140,553 230
Due from other government 23,069 23,069
Prepaid expense 6,000 6,000
Inventory 313,681 112,010 425,691 17,323
Total current assets 2,355,348 4,356,485 791 ,626 126,404 7,629,863 127,321 Other assets
Restricted assets-cash 878,382 225,418 1,103,800
Property, plant and equipment, net 12,253,717 29,377,427 2,488,730 3,370,420 47,490,294 466,880 Total other assets 13,132,099 29,602,845 2,488,730 3,370,420 48,594,094 466,880 Total assets 15,487,447 33,959,330 3,280,356 3,496,824 56,223,957 594,201 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES 169,706 249,930 419,636

LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense 224,856 151 ,757 178,815 122,271 677,699 71 ,641 Interest payable 131,294 37,604 168,898
Deposits 356,029 23,443 379,472
Current portion of noncurrent liabilities 480,000 991 ,000 1,471,000 Total current liabilities 1,192,179 1,180,361 178,815 145,714 2,697,069 71 ,641 Noncurrent liabilities
Revenue bonds payable 10,253,102 15,803,629 26,056,731
Compensated absences 54,062 87,046 3,362 144,470 17,458 Net pension liability 332,405 489,542 821,947
Net OPEB liability 454,566 669,452 1,124,018
Total noncurrent liabilities 11 ,094,135 17,049,669 3,362 28,147,166 17,458 Total liabilities 12,286,314 18,230,030 178,815 _ _ 149,076 30,844,235 89,099 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 459,733 677,060 1,136,793

NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets 1,389,321 12,545, 194 2,488,730 3,370,420 19,793,665 466,880 Restricted
Debt service 878,382 225,418 1,103,800
Unrestricted (deficit) 643,403 2,531,558 612,811 (22,672) 3,765,100 38,222 Total net position $ 2,911 ,106 $ 15,302,170 $ 3,101 ,541 $ 3,347,748 $ 24,662,565 $ 505,102 See accompanying notes. JO

CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSE, AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION -

PROPRIETARY FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Business-Tree Activities-Entererise Funds Governmental
Total Activities
Nonmajor Entererise Funds Business- Interna l
Water Sewer Diseosal Aireort T~e Funds Service
Operating Revenue
Charges for services
User fees $ 3,945,431 $ 5,766,150 $ 1,823,643 $ 112,122 $ 11,647,346 $ 1,242,710 Rents 39,074 4,050 124,679 167,803
Other income 136,052 26,175 2,475 13,799 178,501 6,214
Total operating revenue 4,120,557 5,796,375 1,826,118 250,600 11,993,650 1,248,924 Operating expense
Personnel 1,173,205 1,160,401 (1,114,965) 53,296 1,271,937 714,515 Supplies, materials, utilities and other 1,005,464 1,365,458 223,541 207,316 2,801,779 537,854 Contractual 283,189 502,413 1,858,867 105,451 2,749,920 27,675 Depreciation and amortization 558,496 1,404,945 85,776 136,688 2,185,905 83,964 Total operating expense 3,020,354 4,433,217 1,053,219 502,751 9,009,541 1,364,008 Operating income/(loss) 1,100,203 1,363,158 772,899 (252,151) 2,984,109 (115,084) Nonoperating revenue/(expense)
Gain/(loss) on disposal of assets 9,457 (6,579) 2,878
Intergovernmental 337,320 2,179 126,417 465,916
Miscellaneous 32,342 119,745 2,957 155,044
Interest income/(unrealized losses) (46,321) (151,986) (36,077) (3,850) (238,234) (3,862) Property taxes 6,028 6,028
Interest expense (297,605) (463,925) (2,955) (764,485) (292) Total nonoperating revenue/(expense) 25,736 (486,709) (37,520) 125,640 (372,853) (4,154) Net revenue over/(under) expense 1,125,939 876,449 735,379 (126,511) 2,611,256 (119,238) Other financing sources/(uses)
Operating transfers in/( out)-net (265,509) (326,658) (93,341) 195,161 (490,347) Change in net position 860,430 549,791 642,038 68,650 2,120,909 (119,238) Net Position
Beginning of year 2,050,676 14,752,379 2,459,503 3,279,098 22,541,656 624,340 End of the year $ 2,911,106 $ 15,302, 170 $ 3,101 ,541 $ 3,347,748 $ 24,662,565 $ 505,102 See accompany ing notes. 11

CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Business-Tre e Activities-Entererise Funds Governmental Tota l Activities
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds Business- Internal
Water Sewer Diseosal Aireo rt Tyee Funds Service
Operating activities
Receipts from customers and users $ 4, 147,998 $ 5,829,203 $ 1,854,034 $ 239,471 $ 12,070,706 $ 1,248,694 Payments fo r co ntrac tual services,
supplies, utilities and repairs (1,356, 157) (1,762,25 1) 1,126,556 (4 1,968) (2,033,820) (730,679) Payments to employees (1 ,035,370) (1 ,765,015) (3,730,876) (205,849) (6,737,11 0) (542,141) Net cash provid ed by/
(used fo r) operating activities 1,756,471 2,301,937 (750,286) (8,346) 3,299,776 (24, 126) Noncapital financ ing activities
Payments from o ther governments 24,713 126,681 151,394 Other income 370,038 11 9,745 489,783
Payments from/(to) other funds (265,509) (326,658) (93,34 1) (1 ,853) (687,361) Net cash provided by/(used fo r)
noncapital fmanc ing activities 104,529 (206,913) (68,628) 124,828 (46,184) Capita l and re lated financ ing activities
Proc eeds from sale of assets 9,457 (6, 579) 2,878
P urchase of pro perty, plant and eq uipment (2 14,477) (80, 172) ( 11 5,614) (41 0,263) Princ ipal paid on long-term debt (805,090) (1 ,372,498) (2,177,588) (63,005) Interest paid on lo ng-term deb t 22,356 (282,322) (2,955) (262,921) (292) Net cash provided by/(used fo r)
capital and related fmancing activities (997,2 11 ) (1 ,725,535) (6,579) (11 8,569) (2,847,894) (63,297) Investing activities
Interest received/( Lmrealized losses) (46,32 1) (1 51,986) (36,077) (3,853) (238,237) (3,862) Net incrcas e/(decreasc) in cash 817,468 2 17,503 (861,570) (5,940) 167,461 (9 1,285) Cash, beginning of year 2,066,697 4, 176,976 1,617,941 109,275 7,970,889 20 1,053 Cash, end of year $ 2,884,165 $ 4,394,479 $ 756,371 $ 103,335 $ 8,138,350 $ 109,768 See accompanying notes. 12

CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW -PROPRIETARY FUNDS (CONTINUED)
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
____ _ _ B_us_i_ne_s_s-_T_..,_y..,__ p_e _A_c_tiVI_._ti_es_-E_ nt_e_,rp._r_is_e_F_u_n_d_s ____ _ Governmental Summary of cash, end ofyear
Cash and cas h equivalents
Restric ted assets - cash
Cash, end of year
Reconciliation of operating income to net cash
provided by/(used fo r) operating activities:

Operating income/(loss)
Adjustment to reconc ile operating income/
(loss) to net cash provided by/(used fo r)
operating activ ities:

Depreciation and amortization expense
(Inc rease )/dec reas e in accounts receivable
(lncrease)/dec reas e in inventory
(lnc rease)/decrease in deferred outflows ofresourc<
Increase/(dec rease) in accounts payable
and acc rued expense
Inc rease/(dec rease) in deferred inflows of reso urces Increase/( dee rease) in compensated absences
Increase/(dec rease) in OPEB liability
Increase/(dec reas e) in net pension liab ility
Increase/( dec rease) in deposits
Net cash provided by/(used fo r)
operating activities
See accompany ing notes.

Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
Total
BusinessActivities Interna l
Water Sewer
$ 2,005,783 $ 4, 169,061 $
878 382 225,41 8
$ 2,884,165 $ 4,394,479 $
$ 1,100,203 $ 1,363,158 $
558,496 1,404,945
6,083 32,828
(37,480) (22,980)
(2,755) 1,128
137,717 (76,457)
289,686 340,829
5,296 17,865
(10 1,71 2) (5 12,639)
(220,421) (246,740)
21,358
$ 1,756,471 $ 2,301,937 $
Disposal Airport TYPe Funds Service
756,371 $ 103,335 $ 7,034,550 $ 109,768
1,103,800
756,371 $ 103,335 $ 8,138,350 =$ ==1=0==9,=76=8
772,899 $ (252, 151) $ 2,984,109 $
85,776
27,916
22 1,146
11 ,591
(264,180)
(1 5, 159)
(903,952)
(686,323)
136,688
11 6,779
1,467
(11 ,129)
2, 185,905
66,827
(60,460)
219,519
189,630
366,335
9,469
(1,518,303)
(1,153,484)
10,229
(115,084)
83,964
(230)
19,852
(8,34 1)
(4,287)
(750,286) =$ ==(==8==,34=6) $ 3,299,776 ~$ = =("=24=1,, ' =12='6) 13 CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION - CUSTODIAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Total liabilities
Net Position
Restricted for
$
Custodial
Funds
225,997
934
934
Individuals, organization, and other governments 225,063 Total Net Position $ 225,063 ===========
See accompanying notes. 14

CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION - CUSTODIAL FUNDS JUNE 30, 2022
See accompany ing notes.

Additions
Deposits
Total additions
Deductions
Payment to other entities
Total deductions
Change in net position
Net position, beginning
Net position, ending
$
$
Custodial
Funds
234,217
210,255
210,255
23,962
201 101
225,063
15 CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

PRIVATE-PURPOSE TRUST FUND
JUNE 30, 2022
Assets
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Notes receivable
Total assets
Liabilities
Accounts payable
Interest payable
Long-term debt
Due within one year
Due in more than one year
Total liabilities
Net Position
Held in trust for other governments
See accompanying notes.

Successor Agency
$ 517,648
203,964
1,556,319
2,277,931
186,269
14,599
290,000
3,675,000
4,165,868
{1 ,887,937)
$ {1 ,887,937)
16 CITY OF REEDLEY

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

PRIVATE-PURPOSE TRUST FUND - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
JUNE 30, 2022
Additions
Property taxes
Charges for services
Investment earnings
Total additions
Deductions
Pro gram expenses
Interest and fiscal agency expenses
Total deductions
Change In Net Position
Net Position
Beginning of year
End of year
See accompanying notes.

Successor Agency
$ 687,472
16,626
5,908
710,006
23,280
88,315
111,595
598,411
(2,486,348)
$ {1 ,887,937)
17 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements of the City of Reedley (the City) have been prepared in conformity with Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) as applicable to governmental entities. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles.

These financial statements present the government and its component units, entities for which the City is considered to be financially accountable. Blended component units, although legally separate entities are, in substance, part of the government's operations and data from these units is combined with data of the primary government. Each blended component unit has a June 30 fiscal year end. There are no discretely presented component units included in these financial statements. The following sections further describe the significant accounting policies of the City.

Reporting Entity
The City of Reedley, State of California (the "City"), was incorporated on February 18, 1913. The City operates under a Council-Manager form of government. The City's major operations include public safety (police and fire); highways and streets; water, sewer and refuse collection: parks and recreation; building inspection; airport; public improvements; planning and zoning and general administrative services.

The Reedley Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") was created by a Joint Exercise of Powers between the City and the Agency on November 23, 1993. An Agreement was entered into pursuant to the provisions of the Marks Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, A1iicles 1, 2 and 4, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the California Government Code (the JP A Law"). The Authority, which is governed by a commission consisting of the members of the City Council, was created for the purpose of assisting the financing ofrefinancing of the Authority's project areas. Under the JPA Law, the Authority has the power to purchase bonds issued by any local agency at public or negotiated sale and may sell such bonds to public or private purchasers at public negotiated sale.

Basis of Presentation - Fund Accounting
Government-Wide Financial Statements - The Government-Wide Financial Statements (the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position) report information of all of the nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. For the most pa1i, eliminations have been made to minimize the double counting of internal activities. These statements distinguish between the governmental and business-type activities of the City and between the City and its component unit.

Governmental activities, which n01mally are supported by taxes and inter-governmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely significantly on fees charged to external parties.

The Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each segment of the business-type activities of the City and for each function of the City's governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a program or function and are clearly identifiable to a particular function. Program revenues include 1) charges paid by the recipients of goods or services offered by the programs and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a pa1iicular program. Revenues that are not classified as program revenues, including all taxes, are presented as general revenues. 18 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Net position is restricted when constraints placed on them are either externally imposed or are imposed by constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Internally imposed designations of resources are not presented as restricted net position. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, generally, it is the City's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed.

Governmental Fund Financial Statements - The Governmental Fund Financial Statements provide information about the City's funds, including fiduciary funds and the blended component unit. Separate statements for each fund category - governmental, proprietary and fiduciary - are presented. The emphasis of fund financial statements is on major governmental and enterprise funds, each displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental funds are separately aggregated and repo1ied as non-major funds.

Proprietary fund operating revenues, such as charges for services, result from exchange transactions associated with the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions are those in which each party receives and gives up essentially equal values. Non-operating revenues, such as subsidies and investment earnings, result from non-exchange transactions or ancillary activities.

The City reports the following major governmental funds:

General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used for all financial resources except those required legally, or by sound financial management to be accounted for in another fund. Generally, the General Fund is used to account for those traditional governmental services of the City, such as police and fire protection, planning and general administrative services.

Development Impact Fees Capital Project Fund- The Development Impact Fees Capital Project Fund was established to account for monies received from impact fees and spending of those funds.

American Rescue Plan Act Special Revenue Fund - The American Rescue Plan Act Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the monies received from the State which are to be used for the Covid related costs. 19 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) The City reports the following major enterprise funds:

Water Fund- The Water Fund accounts for the operation and maintenance of the City's water treatment and water transmission and distribution systems.

Sewer Fund- The Sewer Fund accounts for the operation and maintenance of the City's sewer system.

The City reports the following additional fund types:

Internal Service Fund - The Internal Service Fund accounts for fleet management and computer services provided to other departments or agencies of the government, on a cost reimbursement basis.

Custodial Funds - The Custodial Funds account for assets held by the City as an agent for various local governments or other entities. These funds are custodial in nature ( assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations.

Private-Purpose Trust Funds - The Private-Purpose Trust Fund accounts for assets held by the City as trustee for the Successor Agency.

Basis of Accounting
The Government-Wide and Proprietary Fund Financial Statements are repmied using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, regardless of when the related cash flows take place. Non exchange transactions, in which the City gives ( or receives) value without directly receiving ( or giving) equal value in exchange, include property and sales taxes, grants, entitlements and donations. On an accrual basis, revenue from prope1iy taxes is recognized in the fiscal year for which the taxes are levied.

Revenues from sales tax are recognized when the underlying transactions take place. Revenues from grants, entitlements and donations are recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligible requirements have been satisfied.

Governmental Funds are reported using the c1ment financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recognized when measurable and available.

Prope1iy and sales taxes, interest, certain state and federal grants and charges for services are accrued when their receipt occurs within sixty days after the end of the accounting period so as to be both measurable and available.
20 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Basis of Accounting (Continued)
Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. General capital asset acquisitions are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Proceeds of general long-term debt and capital leases are reported as other financing sources.

Proprietary Funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non-operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a Proprietary Fund's principal ongoing operations. Revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as non-operating.

Financial Statement Amounts
Cash and Investments - Cash and investments represent the City's cash bank accounts including but not limited to certificates of deposit, money market funds and cash management pools for reporting purposes in the Statement of Cash Flows. Additionally, investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased are included as cash equivalents in the Statement of Cash Flows.

The City maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds. Interest earnings as a result of this pooling are distributed to the appropriate funds based on month end cash balances in each fund.

Investments of the pool include only those investments authorized by the California Government Code such as, United States Treasury securities, agencies guaranteed by the United States Government, registered state warrants, and other investments. Investments primarily consist of deposits in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. Investments are stated at cost or amortized cost.

Inventories - Inventories consist of expendable supplies held for the City's use and are carried at cost using the first-in, first-out method.

Accounts Receivable - Billed but unpaid services provided to individuals or non-govermnental entities are recorded as accounts receivable. The Proprietary Funds include a year-end accrual for services through June 30, 2022, which have not yet been billed.

Fresno County is responsible for the assessment, collection and apportionment of property taxes for all taxing jurisdictions. Secured and unsecured property taxes are levied on January 1 of the preceding fiscal year. Secured property taxes are due in two installments, on November 1 and March 1, and become a lien on those dates. They become delinquent on December 10 and April 10, respectively. Collection of delinquent accounts is the responsibility of the County, which retains all penalties collected. Property taxes are accounted for in the General Fund. Property tax revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance cunent liabilities. The City considers property taxes as available if they are collected within 60 days after year end. Propetiy tax on the unsecured roll are due on July 1 and become delinquent if unpaid on August 31. However, unsecured property taxes are not susceptible to year end accrual. 21 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) The City is permitted by Article XIIIA of the State of California Constitution (known as Proposition 13) to levy a maximum tax of $1.00 per $100 offull cash value.

Interfund Receivables/Payables - Items classified as interfund receivable/payable represent short-te1m lending/borrowing transactions between funds. This classification also includes the current portion of an advance to or from another fund.

Advances To/From Other Funds - This classification represents non-current portions of any long-te1m lending/borrowing transactions between funds. This amount will be equally offset by a reserve of fund balance which indicates that it does not represent available financial resources and therefore, is not available for appropriation. The current portion of any interfund long-term loan (advance) is included as an interfund receivable/payable.

Capital Assets - Capital outlays are recorded as expenditures of the General, Special Revenue, and Capital Projects Funds and as assets in the Government-Wide Financial Statements to the extent the City's capitalization threshold are met.

Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets ( e.g., roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the Government-Wide Financial Statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $5,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation.

The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Bette1ments and major improvements which significantly increase values, change capacities or extend useful lives are capitalized. Upon sale or retirement of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations.

Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed.

Property, plant, and equipment of the primary government, as well as the component units, are depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Depree iab le ass et
Buildings
Improvements
Machine1y and equipment
Utility system
Infrastructure
Years
10-40
10-40
3-20
5-50
15-50
22 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Compensated Absences - It is the City's policy to permit all employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and compensatory time benefits. Those employees on shift work schedules may also accumulate hours for holiday time benefits.

Vested or accumulated vacation, holiday and any compensation time that is expected to be paid with expendable available financial resources is reported as expenditure in the fund financial statements of the Governmental Fund that will pay for it. Amounts not expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources are rep01ied in the Government-Wide Financial Statements.

Vested leave of Proprietary Funds are recorded as an expense and liability as the benefits accrue.

Unearned Revenue - Unearned revenue is that for which asset recognition criteria have been met, but for which revenue recognition criteria have not been met. The City typically records unearned revenue related to uncollected outstanding, performing loans and intergovernmental revenues (primary grants and subventions) received but not earned ( qualifying expenditures not yet incurred).

Long-Term Obligations - In the Government-Wide Financial Statements, and Proprietary Fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-te1m obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or Proprietary Fund Type Statement of Net Position. Debt principal payments of both government and business-type activities are reported as decreases in the balance of the liability on the Statement of Net Position. Bond premiums and discounts, as well as issuance costs, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the effective interest method.

Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Bond issuance costs are rep01ied as deferred charges and amortized over the te1m of the related debt.

In the fund financial statements, however, debt principal payments of Governmental Funds are recognized as expenditures when paid. Governmental Fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures.

Non-Current Governmental Assets/Liabilities - GASB Statement No. 34 eliminates the presentation of account groups, but provides for these records to be maintained and incorporates the information into the Governmental Activities column in the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position.

Pension Plan - All full-time City employees are members of the State of California Public Employees' Retirement System. The City's policy is to fund all pension costs accrued; such costs to be funded are determined annually as of July 1 by the System's actuary. See note 9 for further discussion.

Bond Discount and Issuance Costs - For governmental funds, bond discounts, as well as issuance costs, are recognized during the cmTent period. Bond proceeds are rep01ied as other financing sources net of the applicable discount. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld form the actual net proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. For business-type funds, bond discounts, are deferred and amortized over the life, of the bonds. Bonds payable are reported net of applicable bond discounts. Issuance costs are expensed.
23 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Net Position - The government-wide and business-type activities fund financial statements utilize a net position presentation. Net position are categorized as net investment in capital assets, restricted and unrestricted.
• Net Investment in Capital Assets - This category groups all capital assets, including infrastructure, into one component of net position. Accumulated depreciation and the outstanding balances of debt that are attributable to the acquisition, construction or improvement of these assets reduce the balance in this category.
• Restricted Net Position - This category presents external restrictions on net position imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors or laws or regulations of other governments and restrictions imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. • Unrestricted Net Position - This category represents net position of the City, not restricted for any project or other purpose.

Fund Balance - In the fund financial statements, governmental fund balance is made up of the following components:
• Nonspendable fund balance typically includes inventories, prepaid items, and other items that must be maintained intact pursuant to legal or contractual requirements, such as endowments. • Restricted fund balance category includes amounts that can be spent only for specific purposes imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments or through enabling legislations.
• Committed fund balance classification includes amounts that can be used only for the specific purposes determined by a formal action of the City Council. The City Council has the authority to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment. • Assigned fund balance are amounts designated by the City Council for specific purposes and do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. • Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification that includes all spendable amounts in the General Fund not contained in other classifications.
24 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) When expenditures are incun-ed for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted ( committed, assigned, or unassigned) fund balances are available, the City's policy is to apply restricted first. When expenditures are incun-ed for purposes for which committed, assigned, or unassigned fund balances are available, the City's policy is to apply committed fund balance first, then assigned fund balance, and finally unassigned fund balance.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts ofrevenues and expenditures/expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2 - Stewardship, Compliance and Accountability
California law authorizes the City to invest in obligations of the United States Treasury, agencies and instrumentalities, certificates of deposit or time deposits in banks and savings and loan associations which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

In accordance with applicable sections of the California Government Code and the Reedley Municipal Code, the City prepares and legally adopts an annual balanced budget on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Annual appropriated budgets are adopted for the General Fund, specific Special Revenue Funds, and specific Capital Projects Funds. Budget plans are adopted for Proprietary Funds. A proposed budget is presented to the City Council during June of each year for review. The Council holds public hearings and may add to, subtract from, or change appropriations within the revenues and reserves estimated as available. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the fund level. Supplementary appropriations which alter the total expenditures of any fund, or expenditures in excess of total budgeted fund appropriations, must be approved by the City Council.

All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year end to the extent they have not been expended or encumbered. 25 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments
The City pools all of its cash and investments except those funds required to be held by outside fiscal agents under the provisions of bond indentures. Interest income earned on pooled cash is allocated to the various funds on average cash balances. Interest income from cash investments held with fiscal agents is credited directly to the related funds.

Cash and investments as of June 30, 2022 are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows:

Statement of Net Position:

Cash and Investments
Restricted Cash
Fiduciary Funds:

Cash and Investments
Total Cash and Investments
Cash and investments as of June 30, 2022 consist of the following:

Cash on hand
Deposits with Financial Institutions
Local Agency Investment Fund
Time Deposits
Cash with fiscal agent
Total Cash and Investments
Fair Value Measurements
$
$
$
26,114,499
1,103,800
743,645
27,961,944
5,300
17,102,640
1,373
9,748,831
1,103,800
$ 27,961 ,944
The framework for measuring fair value provides a fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that a government can access at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs to valuation methodology include inputs - other than quoted prices included within Level 1 - that are observable for an asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
26 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The asset's or liability's fair value measurement level within a fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Investments by fair value level:

Equity:

LAIF
Total Equity
Carried at amortized cost:

Bank Deposits, Time Deposits and Cash on Hand
Total Cash and Investments amortized at cost
Total Cash and Investments
Level 1
$ $
Level 2 Level 3
1,373 $
1,373
June 30, 2022
Balance
$ 1,373
1,373
27,960,571
27,960,571
$ 27,961,944
Investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the City's Investment Policy The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code ( or the City's investment policy, where more restrictive). The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code (or the City's investment policy, where more restrictive) that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. The City's investment policy does not contain any specific provisions intended to limit the City's exposure to interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. This table does not address investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee that are governed by the provisions of debt agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. 27 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments (Continued)
Authorized Investment Type
Local Agency Bonds
U.S. Treasury Obligations
U.S. Agency Securities
Banker's Acceptances
Commercial Paper
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Medium-Term Notes
Mutual Funds
Money Market Mutual Funds
Mortgage Pass-Through Securities
County Pooled Investment Funds
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements
Maximum
Maturity
1 year
1 year
1 year
180 days
270 days
1 year
1 year
NIA
NIA
1 year
NIA
NIA
Maximum Maximum
Percentage Investment in
of Portfolio One Issuer
None 5%
None None
None None
40% 5%
25% 5%
30% None
30% None
20% 10%
20% 10%
20% None
None None
None None
Investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee are governed by provisions of the debt agreements, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy.

The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for investments held by the bond trustee. The table also identifies certain provisions of these debt agreements that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk.

Maximum Maximum
Maximum Percentage Investment in
Authorized Investment Type Maturity of Portfolio One Issuer U.S. Treasury Obligations None None None
U.S. Agency Securities None None None
Banker's Acceptances 1 year None None
Commercial Paper None None None
Money Market Mut-iml Funds None None None
Investment Contracts None None None
Certificates of Deposit 1 year None None
Repurchase Agreements 30 days None None
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) NIA None None
MLmicipal Bonds None None None
28 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments (Continued)
Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. As of June 30, 2022 the City had the following investments:

Remaining Maturit}'. in Months
June 30, 2022 12 or Less 13 to 24 25 to 60 More than 60 Balance Months Months Months Months
Investment Type
Time Deposits $ 9,748,831 $ 1,002,241 $ 251 ,325 $ 2,589,180 $ 5,906,085 Total Time Deposits $ 9,748,831 $ 1,002,241 $ 251 ,325 $ 2,589,180 $ 5,906,085 Equity Securities:

LAIF $ 1,373 $ 1,373 $ - $ - $
Total Equity Securities $ 1,373 $ 1,373 $ - $ - $
Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk
Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by (where applicable) the California Government Code, the City's investment policy, or debt agreements, and the actual rating as of year-end for each investment type.

Investment Type
Equity:

LAIF
Total Equity Securities
June 30, 2022 Rating of Year
Balance End
$ 1,373 Not Rated
$ 1,373
29 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments (Continued)
Concentration of Credit Risk
The investment policy of the City contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code. There are no investments in any one issuer that represent 5% or more of the total City investments.

Custodial Credit Risk
Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit).

The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits.

The custodial risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another paiiy. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for investments. With respect to investments, custodial credit risk generally applies only to direct investments in marketable securities. Custodial credit risk does not apply to a local government's indirect investment in securities through the use of mutual funds or government investment pools (such as LAIF).

Investment in State Investment Pool
The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the City's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the am01iized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amo1iized cost basis. 30 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 4 - Capital Assets
Capital asset activity of the governmental activities for the year ended June 30, 2022 is as follows:

Balance Balance
July 1, 2021 Additions Retirements June 30, 2022
Governmental Activities
Capital assets, not being depreciated
Land $ 3,477,211 $ - $ - $ 3,477,211
Total capital assets, not being depreciated 3,477,211 3,477,211 Capital assets, being depreciated
Buildings 2,377,927 11,050 2,388,977
Improvements 58,176,823 2,480,092 60,656,915
Furniture and equipment 2,010,366 267,843 2,278,209
Vehicles 4,732,864 1,145,198 {243,752) 5,634,310
Total capital assets, being depreciated 67,297,980 3,904,183 (243,752) 70,958,411 Less accumulated depreciation for
Buildings (1,449,779) (53,825) (1,503,604)
Improvements (10,332,797) (1,449,021) (11,781,818)
Furniture and equipment (746,153) (181,756) (927,909)
Vehicles {3,896,097) {214,421) 243,752 {3,866,766)
Total accumulated depreciation (16,424,826) (1,899,023) 243,752 (18,080,097) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 50,873,154 2,005,160 52,878,314 Governmental activities capital assets, net $ 54,350,365 $ 2,005,160 $ - $ 56,355,525 Depreciation expense on capital assets was charged to the governmental functions as follows:

Governmental Functions:

General Government $ 84,488
Pub lie Safety 143,239
Public Works 1,395,521
Parks and Community Services 191,811
Internal Service Fund 83,964
$ 1,899,023
31 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 4 - Capital Assets (Continued)
Capital assets activity of the business-type activities for the year ended June 30, 2022 is as follows:

Balance
July 1, 2021 Additions Retirements
Business-tvue Activities
Capital assets, not being depreciated
Land $ 1,391,382 $ - $ -
Total capital assets, not being depreciated 1,391,382
Capital assets, being depreciated
Buildings 1,100,825 39,200
Improvements 69,689,637 326,492
Furniture and equipment 13,021,145 44,571
Vehicles 1,793,194 US,354)
Total capital assets, being depreciated 85,604,801 410,263 (15,354) Less accumulated depreciation for
Buildings (932,523) (18,354)
Improvements (17,147,692) (1,687,984)
Furniture and equipment (18,453,241) (298,906)
Vehicles (1,196,791) U80,661) 15,354
Total accumulated depreciation (37,730,247) (2,185,905) 15,354 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 47,874,554 (1,775,642) Business-type activites capital assets, net $ 49,265,936 $ (1,775,642) $ - Depreciation expense on capital assets was charged to the business-type functions as follows:

Business-Type Functions:

Water
Sewer
Disposal
Airport
$ 558,496
1,404,945
85,776
136,688
$ 2,185,905
Balance
June 30, 2022
$ 1,391,382
1,391,382
1,140,025
70,016,129
13,065,716
1,777,840
85,999,710
(950,877)
(18,835,676)
(18,752,147)
{1 ,362,098)
(39,900,798)
46,098,912
$ 47,490,294
32 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 5 - Long-term Liabilities
The City generally incurs long-term debt to finance projects or purchase assets which will have useful lives equal to or greater than the related debt.

The City's debt transactions for governmental-type activities are summarized below and discussed in detail thereafter:

Governmental Activity Long Term Debt
Direct Borrowings:
2018 Capital Lease Payable
Total long-term debt
Net pension liability
Net OPEB liability
Compensated absences
Capital Leases Payable
Balance
July 1, 2021
$ 132,348
$ 132,348
$13,119,737
$ 4,311,157
$ 423,119
$
$
$
$
$
Balance
Additions Retirements June 30, 2022
- $ (132,348) $
- $ (132,348) $
- $ (4,938,627) $ 8,181,110
922,397 $ - $ 5,233,554
66,108 $ - $ 489,227
2018 Capital Lease - On September 25, 2018 the City entered into a capital lease to finance the purchase of various vehicles and equipment items. Terms of the agreement call for quarterly payments of $39,702.

The obligation bears interest at the rate of 2.65 percent per annum. The debt was paid off duimg the fiscal year.
33 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 5 - Long-Term Liabilities (Continued)
The City's debt transactions for business-type activities are summarized below and discussed in detail thereafter:

Direct Borrowings:
2016 Wastewater Refunding Revenue Bonds payable
Bond premiums
2017 Water Refunding Revenue Bonds
Bond premiums
2018 Capital lease payable
2019 Wastewater Refunding Revenue Bonds
Net pension liability
Net OPEB liability
Compensated absences
Revenue Bonds Payable
Ba lance
July 1, 2021
$ 2,560,000
172,172
10,905,000
307,097
213,242
15,038,000
$29,195,511
$ 1,975,431
$ 2,642,321
$ 135,000
Additions
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 9,470
Balance Current
Retirements June 30, 2022 Portion
$ (130,000) $ 2,430,000 $ 135,000
(11 ,542) 160,630 11,542
(460,000) 10,445,000 480,000
(18,996) 288, 101 18,996
(213,242)
(834,000) 14,204,000 856,000
$ {1 ,667,780) $ 27,527,731 $ 1,501,538
$ (1 , 153,484) $ 821,947
$ (1 ,518,303) $ 1,124,018
$ - $ 144,470
2016 Wastewater Refunding Bonds - In 2016 the City issued $3 ,160,000 of Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds. The proceeds from the issue were used to defease the 2007 Reedley Public Financing Authority Wastewater Revenue Bonds in the amount of $3,385,000. Interest on the bonds ranges from

2.000% to 4.000%. The City signed an agreement with principal payments plus interest due June 1 and December 1 of each year beginning in 2016 through 2036.

The annual debt requirements due under the terms of the 2016 Wastewater Refunding Bonds are as follows:

Year Ending June 30 Princi2al Interest Total
2023 $ 135,000 $ 86,200 $ 221 ,200
2024 140,000 82,150 222,150
2025 145,000 77,950 222,950
2026 150,000 72,150 222,150
2027 155,000 66,150 221,150
2028-2032 880,000 231,750 1,111,750
2033-2036 825,000 62,850 887,850
Total $ 2,430,000 $ 679,200 $ 3,109,200
34 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 5 - Long-Term Liabilities (Continued)
2017 Water Refunding Bonds -In 2018 the City issued $12,615 ,000 of Water Refunding Revenue Bonds.

The proceeds from this issue were used to defease the 2007 Reedley Public Financing Authority Water Revenue Bonds in the amount of $12,475,000. Interest on the bonds ranges from 2.000% to 5.000%. The City signed an agreement with principal payments plus interest due March 1 and September 1 of each year beginning in 2018 through 203 7.

The annual debt requirements due under the terms of the 2017 Water Refunding Bonds are as follows:

Year Ending June 30 Princi2al Interest Total
2023 $ 480,000 $ 384,281 $ 864,281
2024 500,000 364,681 864,681
2025 520,000 344,281 864,281
2026 540,000 320,381 860,381
2027 570,000 320,381 890,381
2028-2032 3,215,000 1,213,322 4,428,322
2033-2037 3,780,000 635,163 4,415,163
2038 840,000 61 ,931 901 ,931
Total $ 10,445,000 $ 3,644,421 $ 14,089,421
Capital Lease Payable
2018 Capital Lease - On September 25, 2018 the City entered into a capital lease to fmance the purchase of various vehicles and equipment items. Te1111S of the agreement call for quarterly payments of $39,702.

The obligation bears interest at the rate of 2.65 percent per annum. The debt was paid off duirng the fiscal year.
2019 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds - In December 2019 the City issued $15 ,674,000 of Wastewater Bonds. The proceeds from this issue were used to pay off the note payable with the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of $12,475,000. Interest on the bonds ranges from 2.400% to

2.570%. The City signed an agreement with principal payments plus interest due June 1 and December 1 of each year beginning in 2020 through 2036.

The annual debt requirements due under the terms of the note are as follows:

Year Ending June 30 Princi2al Interest Total
2023 $ 856,000 $ 365,043 $ 1,221 ,043
2024 878,000 343,044 1,221 ,044
2025 900,000 320,479 1,220,479
2026 924,000 297,349 1,221 ,349
2027 947,000 273,602 1,220,602
2028-2032 4,040,000 990,041 5,030,041
2033-2036 5,659,000 298,248 5,957,248
Total $ 14,204,000 $ 2,887,806 $ 17,091 ,806
35 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 6 - Interfund Transactions
Due From and To Other Funds
Interfund receivables and payables consist of sh01i-term loans resulting from regular transactions. These loans are expected to be repaid as soon as the borrowing fund has cash. Individual fund interfund receivables and payables balances as of June 30, 2022 are as follows:

Due From Due To
Governmental Funds:

General Fund $ 133,213 $
Gas Tax Fund 32,255
Prop 68 Parks Fund 57,157
$ 133,213 $ 89,412
Advances
Balances rep01ied as "Advance From/Advance To" were for capital project expenditures and have scheduled repayments in future years: On March 22, 2011 , the Airport Fund borrowed $390,928 from the Successor Agency to the Reedley Redevlopment Agency to finance aipo1i expansion. In 2014, the loan was transferred from the Successor Agency to the City's General Fund. Terms of the agreement call for annual payments from the Airpmi Fund to the General Fund of $15,706. During the fiscal year, the remainng advance balance $184,263 was forgiven by General Fund.
36 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 6 - Interfund Transactions (continued)
Transfers In and Transfers Out
In general, the City uses interfund transfers to (1) move revenues from the funds that collect them to the funds' that statute or budget requires to expend them, (2) use unrestricted revenues collected in the General Fund to help finance various programs and capital projects accounted for in other funds in accordance with budgetary authorization, and (3) move cash to debt service funds from the funds responsible for payment as debt service payments become due. In general, the effect of the interfund activity has been eliminated from the governmentwide financial statements.

Transfers to Transfer from
Other Funds Other Funds
Major Funds:

General Fund $ 303,644 $
American Rescue Plan Act 207
Developer Impact Fees Fund 25,003
Non Major Funds:

Gas Tax 1,290
Street Projects Funds 35,762
Public Safety Sales Tax Fund 61,153
Community Facilities District 755,067
Local Transportation Fund 163,807
Landscape Maintenance 13,718
Enterprise Funds:

Disposal Fund 93,341
Water Fund 265,509
Sewer Fund 326,658
Airport Fund 195,161
Internal Service Fund 1,242,710
$ 1,741 ,515 $ 1,741 ,515
• $1 ,242,710 was transfeITed into the Internal Service Fund from various funds to cover fleet management and health insurance premiums.
37 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 7 - Pension Plan
Plan Description - The City contributes to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), an agent multiple-employer public employee defined benefit pension plan. PERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries.

PERS acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and city ordinance. Copies of PERS' annual financial report may be obtained from their Executive Office - 400 P Street - Sacramento, CA 95814.

Funding Policy - Participants are required to contribute eight percent (nine percent for safety employees) of their annual covered salary. The City contributes the employees required share for administrative and public works employees and 5% and 4% of the police and dispatchers required share, respectively. The City is required to contribute at an actuarially determined rate; the cunent rate is 7.590 - 10.340 percent for non-safety employees and 13.130 - 20.640 percent for safety employees of annual covered payroll. The contribution requirements of plan members and the City are established and may be amended by PERS.

Benefits provided - CalPERs provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 50 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non-duty disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is one of the following: the Basic Death Benefit, the 1957 Survivor Benefit, or the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost of living adjustments for each plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees' Retirement Law.

The Plans' provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2022, are summarized as follows:

Hire Date
Benefit Formula
Benefit Vesting Schedule
Benefit Payments
Retirement Age
Monthly Benefits, as a% of Eligible Compensation
Required Employee Contribution Rates
Required Employer Contribution Rates
Miscellaneous
Prior to
January 1, 2013

2.0% at 55;
maximum 2%
COLA
5 years service
monthly for life
55 2.00%

7.00%

10.340%
Safe~ Police & Fire
Prior to
January 1, 2013

3.0% at 55;
maximum2%
COLA
5 years service
monthly for life
55 3.00%

9.00%

20.640%
38 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 7 - Pension Plan (continued)
Hire Date
Benefit Formula
Benefit Vesting Schedule
Benefit Payments
Retirement Age
Monthly Benefits, as a% of Eligible Compensation
Required Employee Contribution Rates
Required Employer Contribution Rates
PEPRA
Miscellaneous
On or After
January 1, 2013

2.0% at 62;
maximum 2%
COLA
5 years service
monthly for life
62 2.00%

6.25%

7.590%
PEPRA Safety
On or After
January 1, 2013

2.7% at 57;
maximum 2%
COLA
5 years service
monthly for life
57 2.70%

11.50%

13.130%
Contributions - Section 20814( c) of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on July 1 following the notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions for both Plans are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CalPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The City is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees.

For the year ended June 30, 2022, the contributions recognized as part of the pension expense is as follows:

Contributions - employer
Contributions - employee
$ 2,285,530
$ 572,563
Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions
As of June 30, 2022, the City reported net pension liabilities for its proportionate shares of the net pension liability as follows:

Proportionate Share of
Net Pension Liability
Miscellaneous $ 4,649,020
Safety 4,354,037
Total $ 9,003,057
39 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 7 - Pension Plan (continued)
The City's net pension liability is measured as the proportionate share of the net pension liability. The net pension liability of each Plan is measured as of June 30, 2021, and the total pension liability for each Plan used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2020 rolled forward to June 30, 2021 using standard update procedures. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on a projection of the City's long-term share of contributions to the pension plans relative to the projected contributions of all participating employers, actuarially determined. The City's proportionate share of the net pension liability for the Plan as of June 30, 2021 and 2022 was as follows:

Proportion - June 30, 2021
Proportion - June 30, 2022
Change - Increase/(Decrease)
Miscellaneous

0.19416%

0.24484%

0.05068%
Safety

0.10364%

0.12406%

0.02042%
Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of
of Resources Resources
Pension contributions subsequent to
measurement date $ 2,285,530 $
Change in employer's proportion 374,863
Differences between employer's contributions and
proportionate share of contributions 618,117
Differences between expected and actual
expenence 1,265,221
Differences between projected and actual
investment earnings 6,649,837
Total $ 3,925 ,614 $ 7,267,954
$2,285,530 reported as defeITed outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement elate will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2023. Other amounts repmied as deferred outflows or resources and defeITed inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows:

Year Ended
June 30
2023
2024
2025
2026
$
$
(1 ,101 ,611)
(1 ,230,516)
(1 ,461 ,082)
(1 ,834,659)
(5,627,868)
40 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 7 - Pension Plan (continued)
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions - The collective total pension liability for the June 30, 2021 measurement period was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2020, with update procedures used to roll forward the total pension liability to June 30, 2021. The collective total pension liability was based on the following assumptions:

Valuation Date
Measurement Date
Actuarial Cost Method
Actuarial Assumptions:

Discount Rate
Inflation
P ayro 11 Growth
Salary Increases
Mortality Rate Tab le
Post Retirement Benefit Increase
June 30, 2020
June 30, 2021
Entry-Age Normal Cost Method in
accordance with the requirements of
GASB Statement No. 68

7.15%

2.50%

2.50%
Varies by Entry Age and Service
Derived using CalPERS' Membership
Date for all Funds
Contract COLA up to 2.75% until
Purchasing Power Protection
Allowance Floor on Purchasing Power
applies
1 The mortality table used was developed based on CalPERS-specific data. The table includes 15 years of mo1iality improvements using Society of Actuaries Scale 90% of scale MP 2016. For more details on this table, please refer to the December 2017 experience study report (based on CalPERS demographic data from 1997 to 2015) that can be found on the CalPERS website.

Change of assumptions - None.
41 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 7 - Pension Plan (continued)
Discount rate - The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability for PERF C was 7 .15%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members will be made at the current member contribution rates and that contributions from employers will be made at statutorily required rates, actuarially determined. Based on those assumptions, the Plan's fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. The long-term expected rate ofretum on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return ( expected rate of returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class.

In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account both short-term and longterm market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical returns of all the funds' asset classes, expected compound (geometric) returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long-term (11 + years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the rounded single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and adjusted to account for assumed administrative expenses.

The long-term expected real rates ofreturn by asset class can be found in CalPERS ' Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. 42 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 7 - Pension Plan (continued)
The table below reflects long-term expected real rates of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to dete1mine the discount rate and asset allocation.

The geometric rates of return are net of administrative expenses.

New Strategic Real Return 2 Real Return 3
Asset Class Allocation Years 1-10 Years 11+
Global Equity 50% 4.80% 5.98%
Fixed Income 28% 1.00% 2.62%
Inflation Assets 0% 0.77% 1.81%
Private Equity 8% 6.30% 7.23%
Real Estate 13% 3.75% 4.93%
Infrastructure and Forestland 0% 0.00% 0.00%
Liquidity 1% 0.00% -0.92%
Total 100%
1 In the System's CAFR, Fixed Income is included in Global Debt Securities; Liquidity is included in Sh011- te1m Investments; Inflation Assets are included in both Global Equity Securities and Global Debt Securities 2 An expected inflation of 2.0% used for this period
3 An expected inflation of 2.92% used for this period
Sensitivity of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the City's prop011ionate share of the net pension liability for each Plan, calculating using the discount rate of each Plan, as well as what the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be ifit were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage point lower (6.15%) or 1-percentage point higher (8 .15%) than the current rate:

Current
1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase
{6.15%2 {7.15%2 {8.15%2
Miscellaneous $ 9,269,566 $ 4,649,020 $ 829,282
Safety $ 7,681 ,424 $ 4,354,037 $ 1,620,998
Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Detailed information about each pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial reports.

Payable to the Pension Plan - At June 30, 2022, the City has no reported outstanding amount of contributions payable to the pension plan required for the year ended June 30, 2022. 43 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits
Plan Description
The City provides medical benefits to qualified retirees and dependants (the Plan) as authorized and specified by Resolution 2020-021 adopted by the City Council of April 28, 2020. The City opted out of the Public Employee 's Medical and Hospital Care Act effective January 1, 2014. Prior to this date, the City provided medical benefits to retirees under plans offered by California Public Employee Retirements Systems (CalPERS), an agent multiple -employer defined healthcare plan.

The Plan is a multi-tier benefit structure, specifically Tiers 1, 2 and 3; where eligible employees and dependants receive differing level of benefits. The City is reponsible for establishing and amending the eligiblity, benefit levels and funding policy of the Plan. As of June 30, 2022, the inaugural and latest actuarial study available, there were 115 active full-time employees and 40 retirees covered by the Plan. There is no city contributions for retiree dental, vision, life insurance or Medicare Part B reimbursement.

Eligibility Requirements
In order to be eligible for these benefits, an employee must retire directly from the City under CalPERS with 10 years of City service as a full-time regular employee and be at least 55 years of age at retirement. The length of service requriement does not apply to Tier 1 benefits.

Tier I - Benefits for cwrent retirees and their dependents are as follows:

A) For cunent retirees and/or their dependents who are not yet eligible for Medicare:

For the retiree only, City shall contribute towards the retiree's monthly medical coverage at the same rate as the City contributes towards Unrepresented employees' monthly medical coverage, as such contribution may be modified from time to time; and
City shall contribute up to $500.00 monthly, total, for medical coverage of dependents who are not yet eligible for Medicare, with retirees responsible for paying the difference in cost between the medical plan and City contribution; and
The retiree must notify the City within thirty (30) days of the retiree's and/or dependent's eligibility for Medicare. Only the surviving spouse or registered domestic pa1iner of an eligible retiree shall remain eligible for the dependent benefit until his/her death or remaITiage. 44 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits ( continued) Eligibility Requirements (continued)
B) For cmTent retirees and/or their dependents who are eligible for Medicare:
i) City shall cover 100% of the monthly premium for a group Medicare Supplement plan, as identified and selected by the City, for retiree and one dependent; and ii) City shall contribute up to $500.00 monthly, total, for medical coverage of dependents who are not yet eligible for Medicare, with retirees responsible for paying the difference in cost between the medical plan and City contribution; and iii) Subject to availability, only current retirees and their eligible dependents shall have access to a 'Freedom of Choice' option, whereupon the City, through its designated provider, will cover up to $251.76 per month ("Cap") for each retiree and his/her one dependent, for the reimbursement of premium cost for a Medicare Supplement and/or prescription drug plan of their choice; and
iv) The $251.76 Cap for the 'Freedom of Choice' option shall be adjusted annually, each January, by the change in premium (if applicable), from year to year, of the group Medicare Supplement Plan then currently being offered by the City to Medicare eligible retirees. The Cap shall always be $10.00 less than the group Medicare Supplement premium to help defray additional administrative costs of offering the 'Freedom of Choice' option. At no time shall the retiree/dependent receive in excess of the premium amount.
v) The 'Freedom of Choice' option shall not be available for new enrollment or re-enrollment after December 14, 2016.

C) Minimum eligibility requirements for current City retirees:
i) All current retirees must be at least 55 years of age as of the effective date of this resolution in order to continue receiving retiree medical benefits for themselves or their dependents. Retirees or dependents who were not enrolled in a City-provided retiree medical benefit as of the adoption date of Resolution 2013-083 (September 24, 2013) are not eligible to enroll in or otherwise receive retiree medical benefits. Affected retirees will not be permitted to purchase coverage in the City's medical plans. Retirees turning 55 years ofage after the effective date of this resolution shall not be eligible for this City benefit.

Tier 2 - Benefits for current full-time regular City employees are as follows, subject to the following eligibility requirements:

A) Minimum eligibility requirements for current full-time regular City employees. To be eligible for retirement medical benefits, a full-time regular employee must: (i) retire under a regular or disability PERS retirement and enroll in City provided retirement medical benefits within 120 calendar days from voluntary separation from City employment; (ii) be at least 55 years of age at time of retirement; and (iii) have been employed by the City for a cumulative total of at least ten (10) years as a full-time regular employee. Employee must be a full-time regular employee at the time of retirement. No purchase of service credit is allowed. Voluntary separation from City employment shall mean any separation other than termination for cause. Termination for cause shall be deemed involuntary separation, and shall preclude such terminated employee from eligibility in and for this benefit. 45 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits (continued) Eligibility Requirements ( continued)
i) In order for an employee's dependent to be eligible for coverage, the dependent must be enrolled in the employee's plan at the time an employee retires, subject to the employee meeting minimum eligibility requirements.

B) Employees with at least ten (10) years of cumulative service with the City as a full-time regular employee upon Retirement:
i) If the retiree is not eligible for Medicare, the City shall contribute either 50% of the medical premium for the retiree only, or the amount that the City then currently contributes towards Unrepresented employees' medical coverage as such contribution may be modified from time to time, whichever is less, using the menu of medical plans available to City employees, or if not available, plans identified and selected by the City; and ii) If the retiree is eligible for Medicare, City shall cover either 50% of the medical premium for the retiree and one dependent, or the amount that the City then currently contributes towards Unrepresented employees' medical coverage, whichever is less, for a group Medicare Supplement plan as identified and selected by the City; and iii) There shall be no coverage for more than one dependent; and iv) If the dependent is not Medicare eligible, the City shall contribute up to $250.00 monthly, total, for dependent medical coverage with retirees responsible for paying the difference in cost between the medical plan and City contribution.

C) Employees with at least twenty (20) years of cumulative service with the City as a full-time regular employee upon Retirement:
i) If the retiree is not eligible for Medicare, the City shall contribute either 80% of the medical premium for the retiree only, or the amount that the City then currently contributes towards Unrepresented employees' medical coverage, whichever is less, using the menu of medical plans available to City employees, or if not available, plans identified and selected by the City; and ii) If the retiree is eligible for Medicare, City shall cover either 80% of the medical premium for the retiree and one dependent, or the amount that the City then currently contributes towards Unrepresented employees' medical coverage, whichever is less, for a group Medicare Supplement plan as identified and selected by the City for retiree and one dependent only; and iii) There shall be no coverage for more than one dependent; and iv) If the dependent is not Medicare eligible, the City shall contribute up to $250.00 monthly, total, for dependent medical coverage with retirees responsible for paying the difference in cost between the medical plan and City contribution.

D) The retiree must notify the City within thirty (30) days of the retiree's and/or dependent's eligibility for Medicare. Only the surviving spouse or registered domestic partner of an eligible retiree shall remain eligible for the dependent benefit until his/her death or remarriage.

E) Full-time regular City employees who are working for the City in a full-time capacity as of September 24, 2013, (Date of Adoption of Resolution 2013-083) who retire on or before December 31 , 2016, shall be eligible for the same City contributions to retiree medical benefits as current retirees as defined in Tier 1 above. Minimum eligibility requirements under Section 2.A shall still apply to subject employees, except that for the minimum eligibility requirement under Section 2.A (iii) shall not apply. 46 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits (continued) Eligibility Requirements ( continued)
Tier 3 - No retiree benefits for future City employees:

A) No new employee or re-hired employee initially hired or re-hired on or after January 1, 2014 shall be eligible for the retiree or retiree dependent medical coverage provided herein, unless said employee was a full-time regular employee of the City prior to January 1, 2014.

B) Current part-time employees, notwithstanding the fact that they are currently employed by the City and may subsequently work for the City in a full-time regular capacity, shall not be eligible for retiree medical benefits, unless they begin work in a full-time regular capacity prior to January 1, 2014 and satisfy all other eligibility requirements. In other words, for purposes of dete1mining eligibility for the retiree medical benefits, the date of hire shall be treated as the date upon which the current part-time employee begins his/her assignment as a full-time regular employee.

The City reported that the only OPEB provided is medical plan coverage.

Employees Covered
Membership in the plan consisted of the following at June 30, 2022, the date of the latest actuarial valuation:
36 ees entitled to but not receivin benefits 0
51 Contributions
The contribution requirements of plan members and the City are established and may be amended by the City. The City determines the required contributions using the Entry Age Normal Cost Method. The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements. 47 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits (continued) Actuarial Assumptions
The City's net OPEB liability was measured as of June 30, 2021 , and the total OPEB liability used to calculate the net OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation date as of June 30, 2022.

Actuarial Assumptions:

Salary Increase 2.75%

2.50%

6.25%
Inflation Rate
Investment rate of return
Health Cost Trend Rates
Mortality rate

4.6-5.65% (Medicare) and 6.5% (Non-Medicare)
CalPERS 2000-2019 Experience Study, Mortality
projected fully generational with Scale MP-2021
Long Term Expected Rate of Return
Asset Class Component
Global Equity
Long US Treasuries
Mortgage-Backed Securities
Investment Grade Corporates
High Yield
Sovereigns
TIPS
Commodities
REITS
Target Allocation*
CERBT-Strategy 1
49%
5%
5%
4%
4%
5%
5%
3%
20%
Assumed Long-term Rate of Inflation
Expected Long-term Net Rate of Return, Rounded
Expected Real
Rate of Return

4.56%

0.29%

0.49%

1.56%

3.00%

2.76%
-0.08%

1.22%

4.06%

2.50%

6.25%
The long-term expected real rates of return are presented as geometric means. * Policy target effective on the measurement date (June 30, 2021 ). Changes to the target investment allocation effective October 1, 2018 do not have a significant impact on the expected long-term rate of return.

Discount Rate
The rate of return is based on a yield or index rate for 20-y ear, tax-exempt general obligation municipal bonds w ith an average rating of AA/ Aa or higher.
48 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits (continued) Changes in the Net OPEB Liability
Increase (Decrease)
Total OPEB Plan Net OPEB
Liability Fiduciary Liability
(a) (b) (a) - (b)
Balance at June 30, 2021 (Measurement Date) $ 7,241,840 $ 288,361 $ 6,953,479 Changes recognized for the measurement period :

Service cost 138,046 138,046
Interest on TOL 485,971 485,971
Actual vs. expected experience (593,743) (593,743)
Assumption changes (92,282) (92,282)
Contributions - employer 445,728 (445,728)
Net investment income 88,296 (88,296)
Benefit payments (360,611) (360,611)
Benefit payments {125) 125
Net changes {422,619) 173,288 {595,907)
Balance at June 30, 2022 (Measurement date
June 30, 2021) $ 6,819,221 $ 461,649 $ 6,357,572
The only assumption change reflected during this period is the change in the discount rates as required by GASB 75.

Sensitivity of the City's Net OPEB Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the net OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage-point lower or 1 percentage-point higher than the cmTent rate :

Net OPEB liability
1 % Decrease
(5.25%)
$ 7,289,657
Discount Rate
(6.25%)
$ 6,357,573
1 % Increase
(7.25%)
$ 5,590,413
Sensitivity of the City's Net OPEB Liability to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rates The following presents the net OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a healthcare cost trend rate that is 1 percentage-point lower or 1 percentage-point higher than the cunent rate:

Net OPEB liability
Health Care
Trend Rate -1 %
$ 5,660,486
Health Care
Current Trend
Rate
$ 6,357,573
Health Care
Trend Rate + 1 %
$ 7,127,520
49 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 8 - Post-Employment Health Care Benefits (continued) Healthcare cost trend rate was assumed to start at 7% and grade down to 4% for years 2076 and thereafter.

OPEB Expense and Deferred Outflows/Inflows Related to OPEB For the year ended June 30, 2022, the City recognized OPEB expense of $595,907. At June 30, 2022, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources:

Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
OPEB contributions subsequent to measurement date $ 396,382 $ Difference between expected and actual experience 1,640,005 Change in assumptions 306,499
Net difference between projected and actual return on
investments 47,039
$ 396,382 $ 1,993,543
The City will recognize the Deferred Contributions in the next fiscal year. Other amounts repmied as deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized as OPEB expense as follows:

Year Ended
June 30
2023 $ (480,569)
2024 (480,812)
2025 (480,248)
2026 (410,353)
2027 (108,893)
Thereafter (32,668)
50 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 9 - Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources
In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows or resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position or fund balance that applies to a future period(s) and thus, will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The City reports $3 ,925,614 in deferred outflows related to net pension liability and $396,382 in deferred outflows related to net OPEB liability. See Note 7 and Note 8 for more details.

In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represent an acquisition of net position or fund balance that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City reports $7,267,954 in deferred inflows related to net pension liability and $1,993 ,543 in deferred inflows related to net OPEB liability.

See Note 7 and Note 8 for more details.

Note 10-Risk Management
The City participates with other public entities in a joint venture under a joint powers agreement which establishes the Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority (CSNRMA). The relationship between the City and CSNRMA is such that CSNRMA is not a component unit of the City for financial reporting purposes.

The City is covered for the first $1 ,000,000 of each general liability claim and $500,000 of each worker's compensation claim through the CSJVRMA. The City has the right to receive dividends or the obligation to pay assessments based on a formula which, among other expenses, charges the City's account for liability losses under $10,000 and workers' compensation losses under $10,000. The CSNRMA purchases excess reinsurance from $1 ,000,000 to $15 ,000,000. The CSNRMA participates in an excess pool which provides Workers' Compensation coverage from $500,000 to $1 ,500,000 and purchases excess reinsurance above $1 ,500,000 to the statutory limit.

The CSNRMA is a consortium of 55 cities in San Joaquin Valley, California. It was established under the provisions of California Government Code Section 6500, et. seq. The CSNRMA is governed by a Board of Directors, which meets three to four times each year, consisting of one member appointed by each member city. The day-to-day business is handled by a management group employed by the CSNRMA. The financial statements of CSNRMA can be obtained at 1831 K Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

The latest audited financial information and the most current info1mation available for CSNRMA for fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 is as follows:

Total assets
Total liabilities
Net position
Total revenues
Total expens es
Increase/( decrease) in net position
$ 140,373,479
120,609,137
$ 19,764,342
$ 58,244,856
57,261,330
$ 983,526
51 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 11 - Contingencies
Federal and State Government Programs - The City paiiicipates in several federal and state grant programs. These programs have been audited, as needed, in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Guidance and applicable state requirements. No cost disallowances were proposed as a result of these audits. However, these programs are still subject to further examination by the grantors and the amount, if any, of expenditures, which may be disallowed by the granting agencies, cannot be determined at this time.

The City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial.

Note 12 - Subsequent Events
The City evaluated subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through December 7, 2022, the date which these financial statements were available to be issued. Management concluded that no material subsequent events have occurred since June 30, 2022 that required recognition or disclosure in such financial statements.

Note 13 - Change in Accounting Principles
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the District implemented GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases (GASB 87). The objective of this statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial rep011ing for leases by governments. This statement requires recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities. There net effect was immaterial to fund balance/net position due to GASB 87 as of June 30, 2022.
52 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

CITY OF REEDLEY

BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE

GENERAL FUND
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Variance with
Final Budget
Budgeted Amounts Actual Positive/
Original Final Amounts {Negative}
Revenue
Intergo vemmental $ 1,771 ,017 $ 1,771 ,017 $ 1,215,140 $ (555,877) Taxes 8,812,649 8,812,649 10,150,877 1,338,228
Charges for services 823,914 823,914 1,122,758 298,844
Licenses, permits, and impact fees 456,200 456,200 891,945 435,745 Other 456,579 456,579 552,991 96,412
Investment income, rent income and umealiz, C30,295) C30,295) C}67,533) Cl37,238) Total revenue 12,290,064 12,290,064 13,766,178 1,476,114 Expenditures
Current
General government 1,980,938 1,980,938 1,823,237 157,701 Public ways and facilities 1,651,296 1,651 ,296 1,279,695 371,601 Public safety 6,521 ,052 6,521,052 6,331,111 189,941
Community services 2,086,389 2,086,389 1,841 ,630 244,759 Community development 1,158,344 1,158,344 904,968 253,376 Capital outlay 871 ,71 7 871 ,717 698,354 173,363
Debt Service
Principal 68,174 68,174 69,343 (1 ,169)
Interest 1,561 1,561 325 1,236
Total expenditures 14,339,471 14,339,471 12,948,663 1,390,808 Revenue over (under) expenditures (2,049,407) (2,049,407) 817,515 2,866,922 Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Proceeds from sale of assets 20,261 20,261
Transfers in/( out) C3 ,434,963) C3 ,434,963) 303,644 3,738,607 Total other financing sources/(uses) C3 ,434,963) 0 ,434,963) 323,905 3,758,868 Net Change in Fund Balance $ (5,484,370) $ CS ,484,370) 1,141,420 $ 6,625,790 Fund Balance
Beginning of year 6,106,008
End of year $ 7,247,428
53 CITY OF REEDLEY

BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Budgeted Amounts
Original Final
Revenue
Intergovernmental $ 6,137,938 $ 6,137,938
Total revenue 6,137,938 6,137,938
Expenditures
CmTent
Public ways and facilities 485,321 485,321
Capital outlay 3,780,297 3,780,297
Total expenditures 4,265,618 4,265,618
Revenue over (under) expenditures 1,872,320 1,872,320
Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Transfers out
Total other financing sources/(uses)
Net Change in Fund Balance $ 1,872,320 $ 1,872,320
Fund Balance
Beginning of year
End of year
Variance with
Final Budget
Actual Positive/
Amounts {Negative}
$ 3,068,969 $ (3 ,068,969)
3,068,969 (3,068,969)
712,476 (227,155)
1,354,141 2,426,156
2,066,617 2,199,001
1,002,352 (869,968)
(207) (207)
(207) (207)
1,002,145 $ (870,175)
(34,592)
$ 967,553
54 CITY OF REEDLEY

BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Variance with
Final Budget
Budgeted Amounts Actual Positive/
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenue
License, pe1mits, and impact fees $ 429,150 $ 429,150 $ 2,223 ,962 $ 1,794,812 Investment, rent income, and unrealized losses 2,650 2,650 (110,806) (113,456) Total revenue 431 ,800 431 ,800 2,113,156 1,681,356
Expenditures
CuITent
Public ways and facilities 136,328 136,328 134,215 2,113 Public Safety 3,172 3,172 3,008 164
Capital outlay 315~000 315~000 312l500 2 500
Total expenditures 1,612,844 1,612,844 449,723 1,163,121 Revenue over (under) expenditures (1 ,181,044) (1,181,044) 1,663,433 2,844,477 Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Transfers in/( out) (25,003) (25,003) (25,003)
Total other financing sources/(uses) (25,003) (25,003) (25,003) Net Change in Fund Balance $ (1,206,047) $ (1 ,206,047) 1,638,430 $ 2,844,477 Fund Balance
Beginning of year 2,667,022
End of year $ 4,305,452
55 CITY OF REEDLEY
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE CITY'S NET OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022 Increase (Decrease)
Total OPEB Plan Net OPEB
Balance at June 30, 2021 (Measurement Date)
Changes recognized for the measurement period:

Service cost
Interest on TOL
Actual vs. expected experience
Assumption changes
Contributions - employer
Net investment income
Benefit payments
Benefit payments
Net changes
Balance at June 30, 2022 (Measurement date
June 30, 2021)
Net OPEB Liability/(Asset)
F jduciary Net Position as a percentage
of the total OPEB Liability
Covered employee payroll*
Net OPEB Liability as a percentage of covered
employee payroll
$
Liability
(a)
$ 7,241, 840
138,046
485,971
(593,743)
(92,282)
(360,611)
(422,619)
$ 6, 819,221
2018
8,560,476 $

1.2%
n/a $
n/a
* For the 12-rnonth period ending on June 30, 2021 (Measurement Date).

Fiduciary
{b)
$ 288,361
-
-
445,728
88,296
(360,611)
(125)
173,288
$ 461,649
2019
8,921,105 $

1.8%
5,274,550 $
169. l %
Liability
(a) - (b)
$ 6,953,479
138,046
485,971
(593,743)
(92,282)
(445,728)
(88,296)
125
(595,907)
$ 6,357,572
2020 2021
6,806,852 $6,953,479

3.3% 4.0%
5,029,499 $4,535,546
135.3% 153.3%
2022
$6,357,573

6.8%
$4,531,132
140.3%
56 CITY OF REEDLEY

SCHEDULE OF THE CITY'S PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY LAST 10 YEARS*
AS OF JUNE 30, 2022
Miscellaneous
Proportionate share of the net
pension liability as a
Proportion of the net Proportionate share of Covered - employee percentage of 2ension liabili!Y the net 2ension liabili!Y 2ayroll covered-em2lo}:'.ee 2ayroll 2015 0.07020% $ 4,368,215 $ 3,808,708 114.69%
2016 0.14007% $ 3,842,777 $ 4,114,174 93.40%
2017 0.17859% $ 6,026,912 $ 4,109,603 146.65%
2018 0.18146% $ 7,040,068 $ 4,595,946 153.18%
2019 0.18145% $ 6,838,511 $ 4,825,079 141.73%
2020 0.18747% $ 7,507,227 $ 4,837,036 169.32%
2021 0.19416% $ 8,190,011 $ 4,754,975 172.24%
2022 0.24484% $ 4,649,020 $ 4,918,139 94.53%
Safe
Proportionate share of the net
pension liability as a
Proportion of the net Proportionate share of Covered - employee percentage of 2ension liabili!Y the net 2ension liabili!Y 2ayroll covered-em2lo}:'.ee 2ayroll 2015 0.11435% $ 4,289,120 $ 1,864,155 230.08%
2016 0.10252% $ 1,471,316 $ 1,839,986 79.96%
2017 0.10121% $ 5,241 ,949 $ 1,859,282 281.93%
2018 0.09928% $ 5,931 ,917 $ 2,044,067 290.20%
2019 0.10068% $ 5,907,614 $ 2,137,197 276.42%
2020 0.10153% $ 6,338,313 $ 1,995,800 317.58%
202] 0.10364% $ 4,354,037 $ 2,100,196 207.32%
2022 0.12406% $ 4,354,036 $ 2,009,461 216.68%
*Fiscal year 2014-15 was the first year of implementation, therefore only eight years are shown.

Changes of Assumptions: None.

Plan's fiduciary net
position as a
Plan's fiduciary net percentage of the Total
2osition Pension Liabili!Y
$ 19,641,792 81.81%
$ 19,808,667 83 .75%
$ 20,698,895 77.45%
$ 22,427, 176 76.11%
$ 24,293,573 78.03%
$ 25,491,960 77.25%
$ 26,245,185 76.22%
$ 30,346,917 86.72%
Plan's fiduciary net
position as a
Plan's fiduciary net percentage of the Total
2osition Pension Liabili!Y
$ 12,420,390 74.33%
$ 13,462,868 76.12%
$ 13,459,556 71.97%
$ 14,775,186 71.35%
$ 16,454,840 73.58%
$ 17,870,516 73.58%
$ 17,540,296 71.75%
$ 20,364,944 82.39%
57 CITY OF REEDLEY

SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS
LAST 10 YEARS*
AS OF JUNE 30, 2022
Mscellaneous
Contributions in
Contractually required relation to the Contributions as a contribution (actuarially actuarially determined Contributions percentage of covereddetermined 2 contributions deficiency { excess 2 Covered-ern.12loyee .12ayroll em.12loyee .12ayroll 2015 $ 456,053 $ (456,053) $ - $ 3,808,708 10.85%
2016 $ 283,216 $ (283,216) $ - $ 4,114,174 10.85%
2017 $ 561 ,583 $ (561 ,583) $ - $ 4,109,603 13.67%
2018 $ 624,739 $ (624,739) $ - $ 4,595,946 13.59%
2019 $ 699,756 $ (699,756) $ - $ 4,825,079 14.50%
2020 $ 810,084 $ (810,084) $ - $ 4,837,036 16.75%
2021 $ 837,930 $ (837,930) $ - $ 4,754,975 17.62%
2022 $ 963,985 $ (963,985) $ - $ 4,918,139 19.60%
Safe
Contributions in
Contractually required relation to the Contributions as a contribution (actuarially actuarially determined Contributions percentage of covereddetermined} contributions deficiency { excess 2 Covered-em.12loyee .12ayroll em2loyee 2ayroll 2015 $ 479,745 $ (479,745) $ - $ 1,864,155 25.74%
2016 $ 533,911 $ (533,911) $ - $ 1,839,986 29.02%
2017 $ 533,061 $ (533,061) $ - $ 1,859,282 28.67%
2018 $ 587,174 $ (587,174) $ - $ 2,044,067 28.73%
2019 $ 646,908 $ (646,908) $ - $ 2,137,197 30.27%
2020 $ 714,848 $ (714,848) $ - $ 1,995,800 35.82%
2021 $ 768,490 $ (768,490) $ - $ 2,100,196 36.59%
2022 $ 869,214 $ (869,214) $ - $ 2,009,461 43.26%
*Fiscal year 2014-15 was the first year of implementation, therefore only eight years are shown. 58 SUPPLEMENT AL ONLY INFORMATION

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
Special Revenue Funds
Public SB2 City Bond Local Street
Gas Safe!l'. Tax Planning Funds Transeortation Pro jects ASSETS
Cash and investments $ - $ 817,385 $ - $ 170,436 $ 793,262 $ 2,450,447 Due from other governments 45,896 339,883 45,799 8,398 220,562 Total assets $ 45,896 $ 1,157,268 $ 45,799 $ 170,436 $ 801,660 $ 2,671,009

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense 13 ,641 73 ,192 1,998 11,088 86,754 5,103 Retention payable 7,329
Due to other funds 32,255 43,801
Total liabilities 45,896 73,192 45,799 11,088 86,754 12,432 Fund Balance
Restricted
Public ways and facilities 714,906 2,658,577
Public safety programs 1,084,076
Community services
Capital projects and improvements 159,348
Unassigned
Total fund balance 1,084,076 159,348 714,906 2,658,577
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 45,896 $ 1,157,268 $ -- __ 421-799 $ ______ 170,436 $ 801,660 $ 2,671,009 59 CITY OF REEDLEY

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
Special Revenue Funds
Public
Co,mmunity Groundwater Education/
Facilities Prop 68 Downtown Blighted Treatment Government District Parks StreetscaEe Proeerties Settlement Access ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 57,876 $ - $ 23 ,178 $ 65,808 $ 3,906,442 $ 14,134 Due from other governments 57,157 6,627
Total assets $ 57,876 $ 57,157 $ 23,178 $ 65,808 $ 3,906,442 $ 20,761

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense 2,355 449 29,871 1,162 Retention payable
Due to other fund s 57,157
Total liabilities 57,157 2,355 449 29,871 1,162
Fund Balance
Restricted
Public ways and facilities 57,876 20,823 65,359
Public safety programs
Community services 19,599
Capital projects and improvements
Unassigned 3,876,571
Total fund balance 57,876 20,823 65,359 3,876,571 19,599 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 57,876 $ 57,157 $ 23,178 $ 65,808 $ 3,906,442 $ 20,761 60 CITY OF REEDLEY

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
Special Revenue Funds
Community
Development
COPS Block Transitional Senior Landscape
Program Grant Housing Center Maintenance Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 30,274 $ 22,722 $ - $ - $ 228,923 $ 8,580,887 Due from other governments 30,000 - 754,322
Total assets $ 60,274 $ 22,722 $ - $ - $ 228,923 $ 9,335,209

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense 2,291 6,262 234,166 Retention payable 7,329
Due to other funds - 133,213 -
Total liabilities 2,291 6,262 374,708
Fund Balance
Restricted
Public ways and facilities 222,661 3,740,202
Public safety programs 57,983 1,142,059
Community services 22,722 42,321
Capital projects and improvements - 159,348
Unassigned - 3,876,571
Total fund balance 57,983 22,722 222,661 8,960,501
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 60,274 $ 22,722 $ - $ - $ 228,923 $ 9,335,209 61 CITY OF REEDLEY

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Seecial Revenue Funds
Gas Public SB2 City Bond
Tax Safet;y Planning Grant Funds
Revenue
Intergovernmental $ - $ - $ 45,799 $ -
Taxes and assessments 607,503 1,766,997
License, permits, and impact fees
Charges for services
Other revenue 1, 198
Investment income/(unrealized losses) 46 {21 ,599) {9,725) Total revenue 607,549 1,746,596 45,799 {9,725)
Expenditures
Current
General government
Public ways and faci]jties 606,259 16,134
Public safety 1,038,941
Community development 45,799 184,553
Capital outlay 557 549 268,558
Total expendit11res __ 606,259 1,596,490 45,799 469,245 Revenue over (under) expenditures 1,290 150,106 (478,970) Other financing sourccs/(uscs)
Sale of assets
Operating transfers in/(out), net {1 ,290) (61,153)
Total other financing sources/(uses) (1 290) (61 153)
Change in Fund Balance 88,953 (478,970)
Fund Balance
Beginning of year 995,123 638,318
End of year $ - $ 1,084,076 $ - $ 159,348
Local Street
TranSJ!O rtation Pro jects
$ 827,289 $ 84,515
1,524,772
25,662
{24,055) (59,742)
828,896 1,549,545
639,209 56,098
40,358 509,646
679,567 565,744
149,329 983,801
17,208
{163 ,807) {35,762)
(146 599) (35 762)
2,730 948,039
712,176 1,710,538
$ 714,906 $ 2,658,577
62 CITY OF REEDLEY

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Special Revenue Funds
Community
I?acilities Prop 68 Downtown Blighted
District Parks streets ca ee Proeerties
Revenue
Intergovernmental $ - $ 87,647 $ - $ -
Taxes and assessments 817,158
Charges for services 20,216
Other revenue 1,152
Investment income/(umealized losses) [9,998) CI ,243) (2,290) Total revenue 807, 160 87,647 20,125 (2,290)
Expenditures
Current
General government
Public ways and facilities 17,887 31 ,760 2, 173
P ublic safety
Community development 1,787
Capital outlay 85,860
Total expenditures 17,887 87,647 31,760 2, 173
Revenue over (under) expenditures 789,273 (11,635) (4,463) Other financ ing sources/(uses)
Sale of assets
Operating transfers in/( out), net (755,067)
Total other financing sources/(uses) (755 067)
Change in Fund Balance 34,206 (11 ,635) (4,463)
Fund Ba lance
Beginning of year 23 ,670 32,458 69,822
End of year $ 57,876 $ - $ 20,823 $ 65,359
Public
Groundwater Educational/
Treatment Government
Settlement Access
$ - $
26,866
(134,950) {270)
(134,950) 26,596
16,204
72,537
72,537 1_6,204
(207,487) 10,392
(207,487) 10,392
4,084,058 9,207
$ 3,876,571 $ 19,599
63 CITY OF REEDLEY

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Special Revenue Funds
Community
Development
COPS nlock Transitional Senior Landscape
Program Grant Housing Center Maintenance Total
Revenue
Intergovernmental $ 161,285 $ 77,217 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,283,752 Taxes and assessments 210,124 4,953,420
Charges for services 20,216
Other revenue 365 929 37 29,343
Investment income/(unrealized losses) (1 ,504) (1,262) 14 {6,289) {272,867) Total revenue 160, 146 76,884 14 203,872 6,013,864
Expenditures
Current
General government 16,204
Public ways and facilities 181 ,393 1,623,450
P ublic safety 102,163 1,141 ,104
Community development 439 232,578
Capital outlay 77,217 1,539,188
Total expend itures 102,163 77,217 439 181,393 4,552,524 Revenue over (under) expenditures 57,983 (333) (425) 22,479 1,461,340 Other financin g sources/(uses)
Sale of assets 17,208
Operating transfers in/( out), net {13,718) {1 ,030,797) Total other fin ancing sources/(uses) 03,718) (1,013,589) Change in Fund Balance 57,983 (333) (425) 8,761 447,751 Fund Balance
Beginning of year 23 ,055 425 213,900 8,512,750
End of year $ 57,983 $ 22,722 $ - $ - $ 222,661 $ 8,960,501 64 CITY OF REEDLEY

SCHEDULE OF NET REVENUE AVAILABLE FOR DEBT SERVICE
JUNE 30, 2022
Business-Tyee Activities - Ente~rise Funds
Sewer Water
Operating Revenue
Charges for services $ 5,766,150 $ 3,945,431
Other revenue 26,175 272,104
Total Available Revenues 5,792,325 4,217,535
Operating Expense
Personnel 1,160,401 1,173,205
Supplies, materials, utilities and other 1,365,458 1,005,464 Contractual services 502,413 283,189
Total operations and maintenance 3,028,272 2,461 ,858
Nonoperating Revenue/(Expense)
Investment income (147,936) (46,321)
Other 129,202 369,662
Total nonoperating revenue/(expense) 047,936) {46,321)
Total Net Revenue Available for Debt Service 2,616,117 1,709,356 Debt Service Requirements
2016 Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds 220,100
201 7 Water Refunding Revenue Bonds 863,081
2019 Wastewater Refunding Revenue Bonds 1,220,477
Total Debt Service 1,440,577 863,081
Net Revenue after Debt Service $ 1,175,540 $ 846,275
Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.82 1.98
65 BRYANT L.JOLLEY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Bryant L.Jolley, C.P.A.

Ryan P. Jolley C.P.A.

Darryl L Smith C.P.A.

Luis A Perez C.P.A.

Lan T. Kimoto

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER

MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Reedley, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the businesstype activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of City of Reedley (the "City"), California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 7, 2022.

Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of City's internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of perfo1ming their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements, on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and c01Tected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.

Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we perf01med tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements.

However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be repo1ied under Government Auditing Standards. 901 "N" STREET, SUITE 104 FIREBAUGH, CALIFORNIA 93622 PHONE 559.659.3045 FAX 559.659.0615 Purpose of This Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

December 7, 2022
67 BRYANT L.JOLLEY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNT ANTS Bryant L.Jolley, C.P.A.

Ryan P.Jolley C.P.A.

Darryl L Smith C.P.A.

Luis A. Perez C.P.A.

Lan T. Kimoto

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR

EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE

REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Reedley, California
Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program
Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We have audited City of Reedley (the "City"), California's compliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the 0MB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2022. The City 's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs.

In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2022.

Basis for Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Paii 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Our responsibilities under those standards and the Uniform Guidance are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our rep01i.

We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. Our audit does not provide a legal detennination of the City's compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.

Responsibilities of Management/or Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City's federal programs.
901 "N" STREET, SUITE 104 FIREBAUGH, CALIFORNIA 93622 PHONE 559.659.3045 FAX 559.659.0615 Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City's compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City's compliance with the requirements of each major federal program as a whole.

In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the City's compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and perfonning such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. • Obtain an understanding of the City's internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.

Report on Internal Control over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the nonnal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet imp01iant enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. 69 Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.

Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

The purpose of this repo1i on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

December 7, 2
70 CITY OF REEDLEY

SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL A WARDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Federal Agency or
Federal Grantor/Pass-Through CFDA Pass-Through Federal
Grantor/Pro~am Title Number Number Exrenditures
U.S. Department for Housing and Communitv Development
Passed through County of Fresno:

Community Development Block Grants/
Entitlement Grants 14.218 18571 $ 82,758
Total U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 82,758 U.S. Department of Justice
Passed through County of Fresno :

Bullet Proof Vest Program 16.607 NIA 3,600
Total U.S. Department of Justice 3,600
U.S. Department of Transportation
Passed through the Federal Aviation Administration:

Airport Improvement Program 20.106 84,420
Passed through the California Department of
Transportation:

Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 CML-5216(055) 127,332 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 CML-5216(054) 99,492 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 HSIPL-5216(052) 4 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 CML-5216(058) 19,757 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 STPL-5216(057) 20,3 12 Total U.S. Department of Transportation 351,317
U.S. Department ofTreasurv
Passed Through State of California
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 21.027 Coronavirus Recovery Fund 18,480 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery 21.027 ARPA 2,066,824 Subtotal 2,085,304
Passed through the Federal Aviation Administration
Coronavirus Relief Fund 21.019 CARES Act - Airport 32,000 Total U.S. Department of Treasury 2,11 7,304
U.S. Department of Homeland Secmitv
Passed through the County of Fresno :

FE.NIA 97.067 10,461
Total U.S. Depmiment of Homeland Secmity 10,461
U.S. Department ofEducation
Passed through the Fresno County Superintendent
of Schools:

Twenty-First Century Community Learning
Centers 84.287 NIA 188,723
Total U.S. Department of Education 188,723
Total Federal Expenditmes $ 2,754,163
71 CITY OF REEDLEY

NOTES SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AW ARDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
Note 1 - Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the City of Reedley, California (the City). Federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through other nonfederal agencies, primarily the State of California, are included in the SEFA. The City's reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the City's basic financial statements.

Note 2 - Basis of Accounting
The accompanying SEF A is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting for grants accounted for in the governmental fund types and the accrual basis of accounting for grants accounted for in the proprietary fund types, as described in Note 1 to the City's basic financial statements. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the SEF A may differ from amounts presented in the basic financial statements.

Note 3 - Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Numbers The CFDA numbers included in the accompanying SEF A were determined based on program name, review of grant contract information, and the Office of Management and Budget's Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.

Note 4 - Relationship to the Financial Statements
Expenditures of federal awards are reported in the City's basic financial statements as expenditures/expenses in the General Fund, nonmajor special revenue funds, nonmajor capital project funds, and the enterprise funds.

Note 5 - Indirect Cost Rate
The City did not elect to use the 10% de minim us cost rate as covered in 2 CFR §200.414. 72 CITY OF REEDLEY

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
A. Summary of Auditor's Results
Financial Statements
Type of auditor's report issued:

Internal control over financial reporting:
• Material weaknesses identified?
• Significant deficiencies identified that are
•
not considered to be material weaknesses? D
• Non-compliance material to financial
statements noted?
Federal A wards
Internal control over major programs:
• Material weaknesses identified?
• Significant deficiencies identified that are
not considered to be material weaknesses?
Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for
maJor programs:

Any audit findings disclosed that are required to
be reported in accordance with 2 CFR
200.516(a)?
Identification of Major Programs
•
•
•
•
Unmodified
Yes No
Yes None reported
Yes No
Yes [g] No
Yes [g] None rep01ied
Unmodified
Yes [g] No
CFDANumber Name of Federal Program or Cluster

21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery
Funds
Dollar threshold used to distinguish between
Type A and Type B programs:

Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee?
$750,000
• Yes No
73 CITY OF REEDLEY

SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
None.
74