Cities Index.
Agenda packet, special meeting

Reedley City Council
July 28, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, special meeting
Meeting
July 28, 2026
Body
Reedley City Council
Pages
2
Original file
190.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on reedley.ca.gov. That file is the official record.

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING

HELD IN JOINT SESSION WITH THE

REEDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
6:00 P.M. - TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2026
Meeting Held in the Reedley Council Chambers,
845 G Street, Reedley CA
Peticiones para servicios de traducción deben ser sometidas 48 horas antes a la Secretaria Municipal al número 637-4200 ext. 212
The Council Chambers are accessible to the physically disabled. Requests for additional accommodations for the disabled, including auxiliary aids or to request translation services, should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at 637-4200 ext. 212.

Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a Council meeting or hearing, no documents shall be accepted for Council review unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk by the close of business one day prior to said Council meeting/hearing at which the Council will consider the item to which the documents relate, pursuant to the adopted City Council Protocols.

The meeting will be held in person and may be observed remotely via Zoom or at:
http://www.reedley.com/livestream.php.

The City of Reedley offers members of the public the opportunity to remotely observe City Council meetings through Zoom. Members of the public wishing to provide public comment may call (559) 500-0810 during the public comment period. Public comment may also be submitted in writing. Members of the public who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at [email protected] by the close of business one day prior to the start of the meeting to ensure that the comments will be available to the City Council. Please indicate the agenda item number to which the comment pertains. Written comments that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the meeting. A copy of any written comment will be provided to the City Council at the meeting. Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting, but will be included with the meeting minutes.

CITY COUNCIL
Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
Mary Fast, Mayor Pro Tem Michael Crutchfield
Christopher Arriaga Scott Friesen

PLANNING COMMISSION
Rosemary Luzania, Chairman
Patrick Turner, Vice Chair Rob Ledington
June Bracamontes Harry Valencia

Page 1 ends

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

WORKSHOP

1. PRESENTATION AND REVIEW OF THE DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS WORKBOOK PREPARED FOR THE REEDLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE - Community Development

ADJOURNMENT OF JOINT MEETING
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 23rd day of July Luthul
Greenwood, City Clerk

Page 2 ends

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
Consent
Regular Item
HE WORLD'S Workshop
FRUIT BASKET Closed Session
Public Hearing
ITEM NO:

DATE: July 28, 2026
TITLE: PRESENTATION AND REVIEW OF THE DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS

AND TRENDS WORKBOOK PREPARED FOR THE REEDLEY GENERAL

PLAN UPDATE
SUBMITTED: Ellen Moore, City Planner S
Community Development Department
REVIEWED: Rodney L. Horton, Director
Community Development Department
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
City staff is presenting the Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook to the City Council of the City of Reedley, the Reedley Planning Commission, and the public for their review and to provide feedback. No formal action needs to be taken on this item.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook is available for public review and comment.

The Workbook presents a concise and reader-friendly analysis of the various topics covered in the General Plan, including land use, public facilities, transportation, recreation, natural resources, safety, health and equity, and air quality. The Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook sets the stage for the overall General Plan update effort by establishing a baseline of information that will guide the following phases of the project.

The Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook is available for public review and comment through Thursday, August 6, 2026. To provide feedback or suggestions on the Workbook, please email [email protected].

ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS

1. City of Reedley 2050 - General Plan Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook - Public Review Draft, July 2026

Page 1 of 1 ends

City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Existing Conditions and
Trends Workbook
Public Review Draft 1 July 2026
City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
This page is intentionally left blank.
1-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Existing Conditions and Trends
City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook
Public Review Draft | July 2026
Prepared by:

City of Reedley
Community Development Department
1733 9th Street
Reedley CA 93654
www.reedley.ca.gov
In Collaboration With:

Mintier Harnish
1415 20th Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
(916) 446-0522
[email protected]
www.mintierharnish.com
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | I-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
This page is intentionally left blank.
1-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Existing Conditions and Trends
Ackowledgements
City of Reedley City Council
Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
Mary Fast, Mayor Pro Tempore
Michael Crutchfield, Council Member
Scott Friesen, Council Member
Christopher Arriaga, Council Member
City of Reedley Planning Commission
Rosemary Luzania, Chair
Patrick Turner, Vice-Chair
June Bracamontes, Planning Commissioner
Rob Ledington, Planning Commissioner
Harry Valencia, Planning Commissioner
City of Reedley Community Development Department
Rodney Horton, Community Development Director
Ellen Moore, City Planner
Laura Friesen, Assistant Planner
Consultants
Mintier Harnish
Michael Gibbons, Senior Project Manager
Nikki Zanchetta, Associate
Hannah Woolsey, Planner
DKS Associates
Jim Damkowitch, Principal, Transportation Assessment Task Manager Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | I-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Table of Contents

1. Introduction.. .. 1-1
What is a General Plan? 1-2
Notable State Laws.. .. 1-3
Regional Setting and Planning Boundaries.. 1-4
A Brief History... 1-7
References.... 1-8

2. Land Use ...LU-1
Existing Land Uses. ... LU-1
Existing Zoning ... LU-4
Existing 2030 General Plan Land Use. . LU-10
Local and Regional Planning Efforts.. .. LU-15
References.. LU-18

3. Population, Employment, & Housing . .PEH-1
Population .. PEH-2
Demographics.. .. PEH-5
Employment and Jobs. ..РEH-9
Housing PEH-13
References PEH-20

4. Circulation C-1
Key Findings.. .. C-2
Roadway System. C-2
Active Transportation . C-21
Transit . C-27
I-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Existing Conditions and Trends
Freight and Goods Movement. C-34
Aviation ..C-36
Transportation Demand Management.. ..C-36
References.. . C-43

5. Biological and Cultural Resources. ..BIO-1
Threatened, Endangered, and Special Status Wildlife Species.. .. BIO-2 Sensitive Habitats . BIO-3
Hydrology... .. BIO-5
Historic and Cultural Sites. ... BIO-7
Local and Regional Planning Efforts... ... BIO-12
References.. BIO-15

6. Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure.. . PFSI-1 Water Supply and Delivery.. ...PFSI-2
Wastewater Collection and Disposal... . PFSI-3
Solid Waste and Recycling PFSI-4
Energy and Telecommunication ...PFSI-4
Health Care. ...PFSI-4
Schools and Education .PFSI-5
Public Art. .PFSI-8
Government Services ..PFSI-9
References PFSI-20

7. Air Quality ..AQ-1
Regulatory Setting .. AQ-2
Existing Sensitive Receptors .. AQ-3
Air Pollution Characteristics and Sources ...AQ-3
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | I-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Existing Air Quality AQ-6
References. AQ-8

8. Safety and Hazards ...SAF-1
Geological Environment and Hazards .. SAF-2
Flooding .. SAF-4
Fire Risks .. SAF-6
Hazardous Materials.. ... SAF-9
Climate Change . SAF-11
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan SAF-12
References... ....SAF-13

9. Health and Equity ... HE-1
What Makes a Healthy Community?.. ..HE-2
Environmental Hazards and Exposure.. .HE-6
Safe and Sanitary Housing ...HE-7
Food Access.. ..HE-8
Community Facilities... HE-11
Civic Engagement.. ...HE-13
References. ..HE-15
1-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026

REEDLEY
Valifornia
1 Introduction
The Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook provides a concise, reader-friendly "snapshot" of Reedley across several topic areas that are addressed in the General Plan. The information included in this document will help identify key trends and inform the upcoming General Plan update.

This chapter provides a general overview of the General Plan and the update process, applicable State laws, a brief history of Reedley, and a description of important planning boundaries.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | I-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
What is a General Plan?
The State requires every city and county in California to have a general plan to guide future growth and development. The general plan is a long-term planning document that is meant to represent the community's vision of its future and identify key priorities over the next 20-25 years to achieve that vision. General plans include goals and policies that City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council use to inform their land use and policy decisions.

There are currently nine mandatory topics covered by the general plan, referred to as "elements": land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety, environmental justice, and air quality.

Communities can include other elements that address topics that are of local importance, such as economic development, community character and design, or agriculture. Elements are similar to chapters in a book, and communities can organize elements in any way they choose as long as all required elements are addressed. Regardless of how the general plan is organized, no one element is more important or holds more weight than any other element included in the general plan.

A general plan has three defining features:

1. Long-Range. A general plan is meant to serve as the guiding document for growth and development over the course of 20 to 25 years, therefore a general plan includes goals, policies, and implementation programs that address both short-term and long-term needs.

2. Comprehensive. A general plan covers a range of topics and is used to guide decisions for a variety of policies and projects from public works to zoning, to natural resources and conservation.

3. General. A general plan is meant to be general in nature, providing a framework for local decision-makers to use when considering future policy and project-level decisions.

Purpose of the General Plan Update
The world around us is constantly changing. New technologies, shifts in economic and natural resources, and global issues can all impact communities at the local level. A general plan is meant to evolve with the changing needs and vision of a community. The City of Reedley adopted its current General Plan in 2014, with some individual elements being updated since then in addition to a comprehensive update to the City's Zoning Code adopted in 2025. While the existing General Plan is serving the community well, this update will address emerging trends, ensure compliance with recent State laws, and consider new opportunities for the City.

Differences Between the General Plan and Zoning Code
Although closely interconnected, a general plan is not to be confused with local zoning regulations.

While both regulate how land may be used and developed, they do so in different ways. A general plan has a more broad, long-term outlook on land use and development. It identifies where general types of I-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Existing Conditions and Trends
land uses can be developed throughout the city and general density or intensity of those uses. On the other hand, zoning regulations are much more specific and technical in nature. They establish specific permitting requirements, performance standards, and development standards such as building height, setbacks, and parking requirements. Zoning regulations must be consistent with the City's General Plan and overall community vision.

Notable State Laws
• AB 32 (2006) Aimed to reduce statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. • SB 32 (2017) Extended the commitment, targeting a 40 percent reduction in statewide GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2030.
• SB 244 (2011) Required local governments to address the infrastructure needs of unincorporated disadvantaged communities in city and county general plans. • SB 743 (2013) Introduced the use of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the metric for evaluating environmental impacts. This aimed to balance congestion management with infill development, active transportation, and GHG emissions reduction.
• AB 52 (2014) Required the identification and reduction of adverse changes to significant tribal cultural resources during the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis. • SB 1000 (2016) Local governments must address environmental justice, identify disadvantaged communities, develop measures to reduce health risks, and promote civic engagement in the public decision-making process.
• AB 1409 (2021) Requires local governments to review and update the safety element to identify evacuation locations and their capacity, safety, and viability under a range of emergency scenarios. • SB 1425 (2022) Requires local governments to review and update its open-space element update to include plans and an action program that address open space access and climate resilience. • SB 932 (2022) Requires local governments to develop and implement bicycle plans, pedestrian plans, and traffic calming plans upon a substantive revision of the circulation element. • AB 1889 (2024) Requires local governments to update their conservation element to consider the impact of development on the movement of wildlife and habitat connectivity. • AB 2684 (2024) Requires local governments to update their safety element to address extreme heat hazards.
• AB 98 (2024) Requires local governments to update their circulation element to include specific requirements for truck routes.
• California 2017 and 2019 Housing Packages (Enacted in 2017 and 2019):
• Aimed to streamline housing development processes.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | I-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
• Provided State financial incentives for housing production. • Streamlined permitting and approval processes.
• Limited fees for housing production.
• Facilitated the development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) by removing barriers to approval and construction (SB 330).

Regional Setting and Planning Boundaries
Regional Setting
Incorporated in 1913, Reedley is an agriculture-based city in southeast Fresno County, in California's San Joaquin Valley. The city is bordered by unincorporated lands of both Fresno County and Tulare County and is about 25 miles southeast of the City of Fresno. Other nearby cities include Parlier, Selma, Kingsburg, and Fowler to the west, Orange Cove to the east, and Sanger to the north. The closest neighboring city is the City of Dinuba, which is about 6.5 miles (from city center to city center) southwest in neighboring Tulare County.

Reedley is surrounded by agricultural land with the Kings River flowing through the western portion of the city, providing water for crop irrigation as well as a variety of recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. Although most of the city consists of flat terrain, the Sierra Nevada foothills can be seen in the distance to the east. The city is located near two major highways, State Highway 99 (about 12 miles to the west) and State Highway 180 (about eight miles to the north). Both highways are heavily used by local, regional, and national passenger and goods transportation. The city is also bisected by the San Joaquin Valley Railroad.

Consistent with the Central California climate, Reedley experiences hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters, making it an ideal environment for fruit production, earning it the nickname "The World's Fruit Basket."
Planning Boundaries
In compliance with State law, every city must consider a Planning Area that consists of land within the established city limits and "any land outside its boundaries which, in the planning agency's judgement, bears relation to its planning." The Reedley Planning Area encompasses about 7,056 acres (about 11 square miles). Included in the Planning Area are the Reedley City limits, the LAFCo-approved Sphere of Influence (SOI), and additional area from the City Council-approved SOl. The City limits encompass about 3,632 acres (5.7 square miles), including the Reedley Airport three miles north of the City limits, and represent the political boundary of land that has been incorporated into the City of Reedley.

An SOl is the probable physical boundary and service area of the city, as adopted by a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). The SOl includes both incorporated and unincorporated areas which 1-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Existing Conditions and Trends
the City is responsible for providing public facilities and services. Reedley's LAFCo-approved SOl encompasses about 4,909 acres (7.9 square miles) and generally follows South Avenue to the north, Buttonwillow Avenue and Zumwalt Avenue to the east, the Fresno-Tulare county border to the south, and along the Kings River to the west.

In 2014, the Reedley City Council approved its own SOl that includes the LAFCo-approved SOl as well as 2,157 acres outside the LAFCo-approved SOl. This expanded SOl identifies areas where the city may reasonably grow over the next 20 to 30 years. Incorporating these areas into the General Plan allows the City of Reedley to proactively plan for future land use and infrastructure needs beyond City limits as the city continues to grow.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | I-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 1-1 Planning Boundaries
mE Sumner Aven
W Parlier Ave
W Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave
N Manning Ave ng Ave
W North Ave E North Ave
Eighth St
Eleventh St E Springfield Ave
WEymann Ave
E Duff Ave
W Dinuba Ave E Dinuba Ave
WOlson Ave E Olson Ave
W Huntsman Ave
0 0.5 1.5 2
Miles
City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area

0.25 0.5
• Miles
Last updated: May 18, 2026
1-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Existing Conditions and Trends
A Brief History
Yokut Native Americans
Before the arrival of white settlers, Reedley and the surrounding areas of the San Joaquin Valley were inhabited by the Yokuts. The Yokuts were divided into several smaller tribes residing in villages throughout the Valley, primarily along the Kings River where there were more abundant sources of food and water.

Early Settlement
The first white settlers came to the Reedley area around 1855 when James Smith and his family arrived and opened a ferry service and hotel on the east bank of the Kings River, which was in operation until around 1874. In 1884, Thomas Law Reed, a Civil War veteran from Ohio, and his family moved to the area to farm wheat. The family farm eventually expanded into a 12,000-acre farming operation.

Railroad Expansion
With the expansion of the Southern Pacific Railroad, Thomas Law Reed donated a 360-acre portion of his land to the railroad company, which in turn established a railroad depot and named it "Reedley" in honor of Reed. The establishment of the depot laid the foundation for further development in the community, which became a booming center of the wheat industry in California.

The World's Fruit Basket
As the wheat industry began to fade in the 1890s, local farmers turned to more profitable agricultural products such as grapes and fruit trees. Although the Reedley area was dry most of the year, access to the Kings River allowed for the construction of canals for irrigation, making it possible to grow more profitable fruit crops. The promise of profitable fruit farming attracted people to the area from around the world, leading Reedley eventually being nicknamed "The World's Fruit Basket." Incorporation and Growth
The City of Reedley was incorporated in 1913 and continued to grow throughout the mid-1900s due to its vibrant agricultural industry that offered steady employment, especially in the wake of the Dust Bowl. The establishment and continued investment of Reedley College in 1926, also known as Kings River College for several decades, allowed for further population and economic growth in Reedley by providing higher education across multiple subjects, most notably agriculture and aviation.

Reedley Today
Today, Reedley continues to be a major producer of a variety of agricultural products, specifically stone fruits such as peaches, nectarines, and plums. With a population of about 26,138, Reedley has continued to steadily grow and is celebrated for its multi-cultural heritage and diverse recreational opportunities.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | 1-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
References
City of Reedley, 2030 General Plan, February 18, 2014, available at: https://reedley.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/reedleyweb/2019/12/Reedley-General-Plan-2030-Adopted-February-18-2014-

1.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

City of Reedley, City of Reedley History, 2023, available at: https://reedley.ca.gov/about- reedley/history/, accessed January 21, 2026.

Discover Reedley, Community Guide & Business Directory, 2025, available at:
https://reedley.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Discover_Reedley_2025-1741376135.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

Reedley College, Facts & History, available at: https://www.reedleycollege.edu/about/history.html, accessed January 21, 2026.

Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, About Us, 2025, available at: https://www.tachi-yokut- nsn.gov/about, accessed January 21, 2026.
1-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026

REEDLEY
2 Land Use
Land use policies, plans, and regulations guide development and shape the urban and rural fabric of Reedley and the surrounding region. This Chapter provides a snapshot of local land use patterns in the city and examines existing and planned land uses. It also summarizes regional plans and discusses how these plans influence land use patterns within the city.

Existing Land Uses
Understanding the type and distribution of existing land uses and development in the city is critical to the preparation of the updated General Plan. Existing land use data was gathered through the Urban Footprint program, which provides a curated, enriched dataset of existing land uses on a parcel-by- parcel basis in the United States. It should be noted that some land uses in this dataset may not be current, particularly for parcels that recently underwent a change of land use or are vacant. Although Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
the existing land use of a property does not carry any regulatory significance and may or may not be consistent with current General Plan land use designation(s) or zone districts) for the property, this information can assist in evaluating the effectiveness of past General Plan policies in directing new growth.

Existing land uses that account for the largest land area in the 2030 General Plan Planning Area include Agriculture (56 percent), Single-Unit Residential Development (20 percent), and Industrial (6 percent).

As seen in Figure 2-1, most parcels with a current agricultural land use are located within the Planning Area, outside of City limits, while the largest existing land use within City limits is single-unit residential development. Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1 provide a breakdown of existing land uses in the Planning Area.

Table 2-1 Existing Land Uses
Land Use Acres Percent
Residential
Single-Unit 1,961.8 20.2%
Multi-Unit 158.8 1.6%
Commercial
Retail Commercial 157.7 1.6%
Office 41.8 0.4%
Hospitals 15.6 0.2%
Industrial
Industrial 606.0 6.2%
Public and Quasi-Public Facilities
Parks and Recreation 94.6 1.0%
Cemeteries 42.1 0.4%
Commercial Recreation 20.1 0.2%
Civic Facilities 115.1 1.2%
Education 260.5 2.7%
Transportation and Utilities 130.4 1.3%
Other
Agriculture 5,478.6 56.3%
Natural Conservation 8.7 0.1%
Water 81.2 0.8%
Other* 556.7 5.7%
TOTAL 9,729.8 100.0%
*Parcels classified as "other" include areas currently being developed Source: Urban Footprint, 2026
LU-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 2-1 Existing Land Uses
E Sumner Ave
th-Aven
E Cypres Ave
E-Duff Ave
E Olson Ave
0 0.5 1.5 2
Miles
City Limits Cemeteries
LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) Commercial Recreation Water
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
Civic Facilities
GP2030 Study Area
Education
EXISTING LAND USE Transportation and Utilities
Single-Unit Retail Commercial
Multi-Unit Office
Agriculture Hospitals
Natural Conservation Industrial

0.25 0.5
Parks and Recreation I Other • Miles
Last updated: May 20, 2026
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Existing Zoning
The Zoning Regulations in Title 10 of the City's Code of Ordinances provide design and development standards, allowable and prohibited uses, and permitting requirements specific to each unique zoning district. State law requires that zone districts be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan; as such, the City's Zoning Regulations implement the land use designations and long-term policies from the 2030 General Plan. Zone districts that account for the largest land area in the city include Low Density Residential R-1-6 (36 percent), Resource Conservation and Open Space (20 percent), and Light Industrial (12 percent). Table 2-2, Table 2-3, and Figure 2-2 provide a breakdown of the City's 13 existing zone districts and three overlay zone districts.

Table 2-2 Existing Zone Districts
Zone District Acres Percent
Residential
Residential Estate (RE) 22.0 0.7%
Low Density Residential (R-1-12) 0.0 0.0%
Low Density Residential (R-1-9) 60.8 2.0%
Low Density Residential (R-1-7) 17.8 0.6%
Low Density Residential (R-1-6) 1,088.9 35.7%
Medium Density Residential (MDR) 112.4 3.7%
High Density Residential (HDR) 220.3 7.2%
Commercial and Office
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) 29.7 1.0%
Central and Community Commercial (CC) 177.1 5.8%
Service Commercial (CS) 40.3 1.3%
Office Commercial (CO) 0.0 0.0%
Professional Office (PO) 21.1 0.7%
Industrial
Light Industrial (ML) 350.2 11.5%
Heavy Industrial (MH) 67.7 2.2%
Special Purpose
Resource Conservation and Open Space 598.3 19.6%
(RCO)
Urban Reserve (UR) 239.8 7.9%
TOTAL 3,046.4 100.0%
Source: City of Reedley, 2026
Residential Estate (RE)
The Residential Estate Zone District (RE) is designed to serve as a transitional area between expanding urban growth areas and agricultural lands surrounding urbanized areas of the city. The RE Zone District is characterized by a mixture of single-unit residential dwellings, missing middle housing types (i.e., LU-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
two-unit and three-unit dwellings), and agricultural activities. The maximum residential density for the RE Zone District is four dwelling units per acre. The RE Zone District implements the Suburban Residential (SR) land use designations in the General Plan. The RE Zone District is further established for the following purposes:

1. To protect active farming enterprises and natural resources surrounding the city and further avoid potential premature conversion of agricultural land;

2. To provide a buffer area between urban and those areas reserved for continued agricultural production, to lessen potential conflicts between development and agriculture; and

3. To provide a lifestyle and living area which combines the advantages of both urban and rural settings.

Low Density Residential (R-1)
The Low Density Residential Zone Districts (R-1) are designed to allow a mixture of housing types and densities in newly developing, low-density residential areas of the city. These Zone Districts allow one-unit dwellings and missing middle housing types (i.e., two-unit and three-unit dwellings), as well as complimentary human services land uses. The R-1 Zone Districts are categorized by minimum parcel size as follows: (R-1(SP), R-1-6, R-1-7, R-1-9, and R-1-12). The allowed residential density in the R-1 Zone Districts ranges from one to eight dwelling units per acres. The R-1 Zone Districts implement the Suburban Residential (SR), Low Density Residential (LDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), and Public/Institutional Facility (PI) land use designations in the General Plan.

Medium Density Residential (MDR
The Medium Density Residential Zone District (MDR) provides areas in the city which allow a range of medium residential development types. The MDR Zone District allows for a mixture of two-, three-, and multi-unit dwellings and complimentary human services land uses on a variety of parcel sizes. The maximum residential density for the MDR Zone District is 15 dwelling units per acre. The MDR Zone District implements the Medium Density Residential (MDR) and Public/Institutional Facility (PI) land use designations in the General Plan.

High Density Residential (HDR)
The High Density Residential Zone District (HDR) is intended primarily for areas of compact high-density housing development. The HDR Zone District allows for a variety of residential opportunities including two-, three-, and multi-unit dwellings, as well as complimentary human services land uses on a variety of parcel sizes. The maximum residential density for the MDR Zone District is 29 dwelling units per acre. Single-unit dwellings are not allowed in the HDR Zone District.

The HDR Zone District implements the High Density Residential (HDR) and Public/Institutional Facility (PI) land use designations in the General Plan.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
The Neighborhood Commercial Zone District (CN) is intended exclusively for the provision of retail and personal service facilities to satisfy the convenience goods needs of the consumer relatively close to their place of residence, work, and or recreation.

Central and Community Commercial (cc)
The Central and Community Commercial Zone District (CC) is intended to be applied both to the central commercial core of the city and to community commercial areas outside of the central core. These areas constitute the primary commercial districts of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business, service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to serve the entire community. Community commercial areas outside of the city's commercial core are intended to be developed into unified centers wherever possible.

Service Commercial (cs)
The Service Commercial Zone District (CS) is intended primarily for establishments engaged in general wholesale or heavy commercial uses, such as servicing equipment, materials, and products, but which do not require the manufacturing, assembling, packaging, or processing of articles or merchandise for distribution and retail sale. Land requirements for most commercial service uses generally dictates its application along arterial streets of the city which generally lie close to central commercial and industrial districts, in accordance with the General Plan.

Office Commercial (CO
The Office Commercial Zone District (CO) is intended to provide for the development of an integrated administrative, business, medical, professional and commercial office district where related and complementary types of land uses and facilities are located in areas adjacent to or in the vicinity of residential land uses and to act as a land use and architectural buffer between residential neighborhoods and more intense uses of land.

Professional Office (PO)
The Professional Office Zone District (PO) is intended to provide opportunities for the location of administrative, business, medical, professional and general offices in close relationship to one another in areas designated for combined professional office use, including high density use, by the General Plan; to provide adequate space to meet the needs of such offices for off street parking and loading space; and to protect offices from noise, disturbances, traffic hazards and other objectionable influences which would adversely affect professional and business practices being carried on.

The Light Industrial Zone District (ML) is applied to areas appropriate for light industrial and manufacturing, warehousing, offices, and assembly uses. Land uses allowed in the ML zone do not create objectionable noise, smoke, odor, dust, noxious gases, glare, heat, vibration, or industrial wastes.

LU-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
The ML Zone District implements the Light Industrial (LI) and Service Commercial (SC) land use designations in the General Plan.

Heavy Industrial (MH)
The Heavy Industrial Zone District (MH) is applied to areas appropriate for a wider variety of land uses that are more land-intensive manufacturing uses than allowed in the ML Zone District. The MH Zone District implements the Heavy Industrial (HI) land use designation in the General Plan.

Resource Conservation and Open Space (RCO)
The Resource Conservation and Open Space Zone District (RCO) is intended to provide for permanent open spaces in areas of the city which exhibit significant vegetation, scenic qualities, wildlife or recreation potential, and which are designated as open space or school and college sites by the General Plan. The maximum allowed residential density in the RCO Zone District is four dwelling units per acre.

The RCO Zone District implements the Suburban Residential (SR), Low Density Residential (LDR), Open Space (OS), and Public/Institutional Facility (PI) land use designations in the General Plan.

Urban Reserve (UR)
The Urban Reserve Zone District (UR) is intended to apply to areas which designated by the General Plan to be held in reserve for the future urban expansion of low-density residential, medium-density residential, high density residential, light industrial, and heavy industrial land uses. The allowed residential density in the UR Zone District ranges from four to 29 dwelling units per acre. The UR Zone District implements the Low Density Residential (LDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), Light Industrial (LI), Heavy Industrial (HI), Open Space (OS), Public/Institutional Facility (PI), and Community Buffer land use designations in the General Plan Overlay Zone Districts
For areas with special site development concerns, an overlay designation can be used. Overlay zone districts apply additional development standards on top of any applicable standards from the "base" zone district to implement specific structural, physical, or design characteristics in new development.

The existing Zoning Regulations implement three overlay zone districts:

Floodway (-FW)
The Floodway Overlay Zone District (-FW) is intended for application to all areas designated by the General Plan as lying within a designated floodway. The FW Overlay Zone District implements the Open Space (OS) and Community Buffer land use designations in the General Plan.

Flood Fringe (-FF)
The Flood Fringe Overlay Zone District (-FF) is intended for application to all areas designated by the General Plan as lying within a flood fringe area. The FF Overlay Zone District implements the Open Space (OS) and Community Buffer land use designations in the General Plan.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Planned Unit Development (-PUD)
The Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone District (-PUD) is intended to apply to base zoning districts to ensure that property will be developed in a manner superior to that which would otherwise be achieved through strict adherence to the regulations of the base zoning district.

Table 2-3 Existing Overlay Zone Districts
Overlay Zone District Acres Percent
Floodway (-W) 0.0 0.0%
Flood Fringe (-FF) 82.0 2.7%
Planned Unit Development (-PUD) 143.2 4.8%
Source: City of Reedley, 2026
LU-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 2-2 Existing Zone Districts
•E Sumner Aven
th Aven

0.5 1.5 2
Miles
City Limits High Density Residential (HDR)
_ LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Central and Community Commercial (CC)
• City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
Service Commercial (CS)
GP2030 Study Area Professional Office (PO)
ZONING DISTRICTS Light Industrial (ML)
Residential Estate (RE) Heavy Industrial (MH)
Low Density Residential SP (R-1(SP)) Resource Conservation and Open Space (RCO)
Low Density Residential (R-1-6)
Urban Reserve (UR)
Low Density Residential (R-1-7)
Low Density Residential (R-1-9) OVERLAY ZONES

0.25 0.5
Medium Density Residential (MDR) V. Flood Fringe (FF) Miles * Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Last updated: May 20, 2026
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Existing 2030 General Plan Land Use
The 2030 City of Reedley General Plan guides how land in the city may be developed and used. Each parcel is designated for a particular use and establishes broad development policies that assist in addressing development issues. Land use designations identify the types of development allowed (i.e., residential, commercial, industrial), residential density (i.e., how many dwelling units are allowed per acre), and the intensity for commercial and industrial development (i.e., minimum and maximum parcel size). These designations aim to diversify the economic base of the community, encourage a variety of housing types, provide adequate public facilities, and allow for neighborhood connectivity and walkability while preserving Reedley's core and small-town atmosphere. Land use designations that account for the largest land area in the Planning Area include Low Density Residential (45 percent), Public/Institutional Facility (14 percent), and Light Industrial (11 percent). Approximately 34 percent of the 9,761 acres that make up the Planning Area do not have a General Plan land use designation. Table 2-4 and Figure 2-3 provide a breakdown of the 15 existing General Plan land use designations.

Table 2-4 Existing 2030 General Plan Land Use Designations Land Use Designation Acres Percent*
Residential
Suburban Residential 93.9 1.5%
Low Density Residential 2,873.4 44.9%
Medium Density Residential 109.4 1.7%
High Density Residential 257.0 4.0%
Commercial
Central Downtown 45.4 0.7%
Neighborhood Commercial 49.5 0.8%
Community Commercial 360.7 5.6%
Office Commercial 17.1 0.3%
Service Commercial 142.6 2.2%
Industrial
Light Industrial 727.0 11.4%
Heavy Industrial 186.7 2.9%
Other
Open Space 559.4 8.7%
Public/Institutional Facility 866.2 13.5%
Community Buffer 110.9 1.7%
Urban Reserve 0.0 0.0%
TOTAL 6,399.20 100.0%
*Percent of all parcels with a General Plan land use designation.

Note: Approximately 3,363 acres of land located within the 2030 General Plan study area (10,740 acres) but outside of City Limits do not have a 2030 General Plan land use designation.

LU-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
Source: City of Reedley, 2026
Suburban Residential
Suburban Residential designation is intended for single-unit detached residential development at densities between one and four dwelling units per gross acre. The designation is intended to accommodate larger residential parcels up to a maximum of one acre in size.

Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential designation is intended for single-unit detached residential development, attached single unit, and low density multi-unit uses at densities between four and eight dwelling units per gross acre. This is the predominant residential designation in the City of Reedley.

Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential designation is intended for single-unit and multi-unit development at densities ranging from eight to 15 dwelling units per gross acre. This designation should be located near or adjacent to collector or arterial intersection and close to shopping and employment opportunities. Multi-unit developments are intended to serve as a transition between commercial and single-unit residential neighborhoods
High Density Residential
The High Density Residential designation is intended for multi-unit development, including multi-story condominium or apartment developments at densities between 15 and 29 dwelling units per gross acre.

This designation is intended to accommodate residential development on parcels between one half and four acres in size.

Central Downtown
The Central Downtown land use designation allows for a mix of retail, financial, professional and government office and housing in Reedley's historic downtown area. This designation and its associated policies aim to provide support for the continued use and vitality of the city core, including support for a wide range of retail services, professional and governmental offices, and mixed use development.

Neighborhood Commercial
The Neighborhood Commercial designation allows for a mix of retail and service-oriented uses that will serve the immediate neighborhoods, provide a destination for local transit and places for social gathering of neighborhood residents, and be designed to provide pedestrian connectivity to surrounding areas. This designation is intended to accommodate commercial development on parcels between 1 and 10 acres in size.

Community Commercial
The Community Commercial designation supplements other commercial, business, and other similar service designations by providing a wide range of consolidated shopping opportunities near residential Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
areas that serve the entire community. This designation is intended to accommodate commercial development on parcels between 5 and 40 acres in size.

Office Commercial
The Office Commercial designation allows for the development of administrative, business, medical, professional, and other general offices.

Service Commercial
The Service Commercial designation allows for general wholesale or heavy commercial uses, which, due to space requirements or the distinctive nature of their operations, are not usually located in other commercial centers. Uses that can be located in the Neighborhood and Community Commercial designations are generally discouraged from being located in Service Commercial areas. ght Industrial
The Light Industrial designation allows for limited industrial uses outside of urban residential areas.

This designation should be used in areas with convenient and accessible transportation networks to assist in moving raw and manufactured products.

Heavy Industrial
The Heavy Industrial designation allows for more intense industrial uses. This highest intensification of this designation typically surrounds the Light Industrial designation, which acts as a buffer to protect other commercial and residential areas of the city. This designation should be used in areas with convenient and accessible transportation networks to assist in moving raw and manufactured products.

Open Space
The Open Space designation consists of undeveloped land space and water courses, as well as recreational facilities and other publicly designated open space uses. Open Space areas include wildlife habitats, floodplain land, and other hazard areas, and public and private recreational facilities.

Public/Institutional Facility
The Public/Institutional Facility designation allows for governmental and quasi-governmental facilities and services which are necessary for the general welfare of the community. Typical uses include government buildings, wastewater treatment plants), retention basins, schools, and cemeteries. ommunity Buffer
The Community Buffer designation allows for urban landscaping that provides beautification and protection along selected public streets and serves as a transition to high intensity urban uses. Buffers shall be at least 20 to 50 feet in width from face of curb (this includes public right-of-way and 10 to 40 feet of landscaping). Buffers may incorporate trees, ground cover, sidewalks, walls and architectural design features of aesthetic appeal. Buffer strips may be provided on private property or dedicated to the City for maintenance, subject to establishment of a Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District or LU-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
similar funding mechanism for maintenance. Buffer strips along the west side of Kings River Road shall be landscaped in a manner which is compatible with the Kings River riparian area.

Urban Reserve
The Urban Reserve designation includes limited agricultural areas that, in the future, will be designated with an urban land use as the city expands.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 2-3 Existing 2030 General Plan Land Use Designations 0 0.5 1.5 2
• Miles
City Limits Open Space
" LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) Public Institutional Facility Community Buffer
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
Central Downtown Commercial
GP2030 Study Area Neighborhood Commercial
Suburban Residential (1-4 units per gross Community Commercial acre)
Office Commercial
Low Density Residential (4.1-8 units per gross
acre) Service Commercial
Medium Density Residential (8.1-15 units per Light Industrial gross acre
Heavy Industrial
High Density Residential (15.1-29 units per 0.25 0.5
County Parcels
gross acre • Miles
Last updated: May 20, 2026
LU-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
Local and Regional Planning Efforts
Notable City Plans
Climate Action Plan
Climate
The City's 2030 General Plan includes goals and policies directed Action
toward a reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and establishing Plan a Climate Action Plan (CAP). This adopted CAP showcases the GHG emission reductions achieved by the City through strategic changes to municipal operations and compliance with California Assembly Bill 32 (Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006), as well as the City's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Compliance Checklist for new development.

The City succeeded in reducing its GHG emissions by 23 percent The City of Reedley between the 2005 "baseline" and 2015, and aims to further reduce GHG December 8, 2015
emissions by 50 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan
The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan coordinates the planning City of Reedley
efforts of the City and unincorporated areas of the county from a regional transportation planning perspective, providing long-range policy guidance for the development of a connected, extensive bicycle and Bicycle and pedestrian transportation network in the Reedley area. The Plan outlines Pedestrian goals, objectives, and policies regarding facilities standards, local bike Mobility Plan and pedestrian systems, and potential funding sources for implementation. The Plan was prepared through the Fresno COG Circuit Planner Program in consultation with City of Reedley Planning and Engineering staff and was prepared to reflect the goals, objectives, and policies referenced in the 2010 City of Reedley Bicycle Transportation Plan and the 2017 Fresno Regional Active Transportation Plan (ATP).

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-15 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Reedley Moves Active Transportation and Parkway
Master Plan
The Reedley Moves Active Transportation and Parkway Master Plan is a guide for the City to create comfortable conditions for walking, rolling, and biking for people of all ages and abilities and obtain grant funding for infrastructure investments and programs. The three key plan

REEDLEY MOVES
recommendations and their corresponding strategies aim to expand and enhance the Reedley Parkway, expand the on-street bikeway network, and improve pedestrian connections. The implementation of these recommendations will provide a well-connected network of bikeways and trails, improve public health, and make it easier and safer to walk to destinations across the city.

Reedley City-Wide Park and Recreation Master Plan
The Reedley City-Wide Park and Recreation Master Plan serves as a guide to plan for future parks and recreation facilities in the city. The CITY-WIDE PARK & RECREATION Plan's objectives include identifying current and future park needs, identifying locations and acreage for future parks and recreation facilities, and addressing financial needs for meeting goals and policies.

The document includes baseline data from 2009, policies, recommendations, standards for new parks and recreation facilities, and funding recommendations for the allocation of resources to develop future facilities and programs. This Plan was developed as a part of the 2030 General Plan Update.

Reedley Sports Park Master Plan

REEDLEY SPORTS PARK

MASTER PLAN
The Reedley Sports Park Master Plan acts as a guide for the planning and development of a 45.5-acre park facility including both active and passive recreation amenities. Phase one of construction was completed in 2009 and included a large ball field complex, group picnic area, playground, restrooms, and on-site parking. This master plan was updated in 2015 to plan for expansions to the Park that meet the changing needs of the community, including the need for a new swim complex and public open space for this rapidly growing area. rhaa
LU-16 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Land Use Existing Conditions and Trends
Kings River Corridor Specific Plan
City of Reedley This Specific Plan provides guidance for the use, management, and protection of the Kings River Corridor to protect and enhance this important natural resource while allowing for appropriate residential, commercial, and recreational facility development. The Specific Plan area includes lands in both unincorporated Fresno County and the City of Reedley under varied ownership, including numerous public agencies, Kings River Corridor
Specific Plan quasi-public districts, and private landowners.

January, 1991
Notable Regional Plans
Fresno Multi-Jurisdictional 2023-2031 Housing Element
The Fresno Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element is a document that addresses housing needs from a regional perspective for 15 juridictions in Fresno County, including the County itself as well as the cities of Coalinga, Firebaugh, Fowler, Fresno City, Huron, Kerman, Kingsburg, Fresno Multi-Jurisdictional Mengota, Orange Cove, Parlier, Reedley, San Joaquin, Sanger, and 2023-2031 Housing Element
Adopted i Anni 2024 Selma. The Housing Element identifies the region's current housing needs; regional goals and objectives regarding housing production, rehabilitation, and conservation; and defines policies and programs to achieve the region's housing goals and objectives. Appendix 1L of the document covers needs and conditions, constraints, an action plan, the sites inventory, and an assessment of fair housing specific to the City of Reedley.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | LU-17 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
References
City of Reedley, Code of Ordinances, Title 10 Zoning Regulations, September 10, 2024, available at:
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/reedleyca/latest/reedley_ca/0-0-O-12410, accessed January 20, 2026.

City of Reedley, Reedley Moves Active Transportation and Parkway Master Plan, 2024, accessed January 21, 2026.

City of Reedley, Kings River Corridor Specific Plan, January 1991, accessed January 21, 2026.

City of Reedley, 2030 General Plan, February 18, 2014, available at: https://reedley.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/reedleyweb/2019/12/Reedley-General-Plan-2030-Adopted-February-18-2014-

1.pdf, accessed January 20, 2026.

City of Reedley, Climate Action Plan, December 8, 2015, available at: https://reedley.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/reedleyweb/2019/12/City-of-Reedley-Climate-Action-Plan.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

City of Reedley, Reedley Sports Park Master Plan, February 2016, available at:
https://reedley.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/reedleyweb/2022/02/2016-02- 10_2015_Reedley_ Sports_Park_MP_Revision_Report-Final-1643763312.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

City of Reedley, Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan, April 2019, available at: https://reedley.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/reedleyweb/2020/01/Reedley-Bicycle-and-Pedestrian-Mobility-Plan_FINAL.pdf. accessed January 21, 2026.

Fresno Council of Governments, Fresno Multi-Jurisdictional 2023-2031 Housing Element, April 2024, available at: https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Fresno-Multi-Jurisdictional-2023- 2031-Housing-Element.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

LU-18 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 EUNN.EL.GAKES
3 Population,
Employment, &
Housing
Understanding the makeup of the population and housing conditions allows jurisdictions to better gauge the needs and concerns of their residents. This chapter provides a description of population, demographic, employment, and housing characteristics in the city using the most recently available American Community Survey demographic and housing datasets, as well as available housing market and economic data available from online sources.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Population
According to the most recent American Community Survey data, the population in Reedley was 26,138 in 2024. The median age in the city is 32 years old, indicating a high percentage of youth and working age adults.

Figure 3-1 shows the age distribution of the population of Reedley. The population is young, with around 80 percent under 55 years of age. Approximately 37 percent of the citywide population between the ages of 25 and 54, the three largest age groups. By contrast, just over 10 percent of the population is 65 or older.

Figure 3-1 Population by Age, Reedley
Under 5 years 8.8%
5 to 9 years 7.5%
10 to 14 years 8.0%
15 to 19 years 8.9%
20 to 24 years 7.1%
25 to 34 years 13.4%
35 to 44 years 12.0%
45 to 54 years 12.1%
55 to 59 years 6.3%
60 to 64 years 5.6%
65 to 74 years 5.8%
75 to 84 years 2.9%
85 years and over 1.6%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS) Five-year Estimates, Table DP05, 2023.

PEH-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Historic Population Trends
Since 2010, both Reedley and Fresno County have grown at a significantly higher rate than California's statewide average. Between 2010 and 2024, the population in Reedley grew by 8 percent and the population in the county grew by 10 percent (Table 3-1). The population of California grew by just six percent during this time; however, between 2020 and 2024 the statewide population decreased by more than 100,000.

Table 3-1 Population Trends, 2010-2024
Percent Change Annual Growth
2010 2020 2024 2010-2024 Rate
Reedley 24,194 25,220 26,138 8% 1.43%
Fresno County 930,450 1,008,654 1,024,125 10% 1.05%
California 37,253,956 39,538,223 39,431,263 6% 0.51%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, QuickFacts, 2025.

Projected Population
According to projections published by Fresno County Council of Government (Fresno COG), Reedley's population is expected to add more than 3,000 residents between 2022 and 2060 (Table 3-2). This projection assumes a 0.34 percent annual growth rate over this period, which is lower than the annual growth rate experienced between 2010 and 2024 (1.43 percent), as shown in Table 3-1.

Table 3-2 Population Projections by Jurisdiction Sphere of Influence Jurisdiction 2022 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 Total Population
County Total 1,010.550 1,017,950 1.041,670 1,066,610 1,090,820 1,111,570 1,125,490 1,131,120 1,128,530 Clovis SOI 126,960 129,050 136,500 142,490 148,310 153,300 156,650 158,000 157,380 Coalinga SOI 17,290 17,300 17,530 17,770 17,990 18,190 18,320 18,370 18,350 Firebaugh SOI 8,420 8,410 8,670 8,830 8,990 9,120 9,210 9,250 9,230 Fowler SOI 7,310 7,660 8,240 8,910 9,550 10,110 10,480 10,630 10,560 Fresno SOI (incl. 592,280 595,370 605,800 617,840 629,520 639,540 646,260 648,980 647,730 county islands)
Huron SOI 6,170 6,230 6,260 6,390 6,520 6,630 6,710 6,740 6,720 Kerman SOI 16,830 17,360 18,510 19,650 20,750 21,700 22,340 22,600 22,480 Kingsburg SOI 12,750 13,210 13,750 14,550 15,340 16,010 16,460 16,650 16,560 Mendota SOI 12,500 12,530 13,070 13,400 13,710 13,980 14,170 14,240 14,210 Orange Cove SOI 9,590 9,600 9,670 9,780 9,890 9,990 10,050 10,070 10,060 Parlier SOI 15,030 15,040 15,060 15,200 15,340 15,450 15,530 15,560 15,550 Reedley SOI 25,290 25,830 25,900 26,740 27,550 28,250 28,710 28,900 28,820 Sanger SOI 27,040 27,040 27,540 27,940 28,330 28,670 28,900 28,990 28,940 San Joaquin SOI 3,670 3,610 3,640 3,670 3,700 3,720 3.740 3,750 3,740 Selma SOI 26,540 26,650 28,250 29,150 30,030 30,790 31,290 31,490 31,400 Unincorporated 102,880 103,050 103,280 104,290 105,280 106,120 106,680 106,910 106,800 Areas (excl. SOls)
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | РЕH-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Source: Fresno COG, 2023-2060 Growth Projections, November 21, 2024.

PEH-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Demographics
This section provides a brief description of Reedley's population, including race, occupation, educational attainment, and household income. Understanding of the makeup of the population allows jurisdictions to better gauge needs and concerns of their residents.

Race/Ethnicity
Table 3-3 summarizes data on racial demographics for 2010 and 2023. The city's racial demographics are mixed and becoming more diverse. In 2010, white residents made up approximately 67 percent of the population compared to around 43 percent in 2023, though some of this large decrease can be attributed to changes in Census data collection related to race and ethnicity, which has expanded and become more nuanced since 2010. The largest increases were among individuals identifying as some other race (24 percent in 2010 to 31 percent in 2023) and individuals of two or more races (3 percent in 2010 to 20 percent in 2023).

Table 3-3 Racial Demographics, 2010 and 2023
2010 2023 Percent
Change
Total Percent Total Percent 2015-2023
Total population 23,669 100% 25,446 100% 7%
One race 22,988 97% 20,313 80% - 13%
White 15,951 67% 10,928 43% -46%
Black or African American 106 0% 420 2% 75%
American Indian and Alaska Native 210 1% 289 1% 27%
Asian 931 4% 327 1% -185%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0% 6 <1% 100% Some Other Race 5,790 24% 8,343 33% 31%
Two or More Races 681 3% 5,133 20% 87%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table DP05, 2010, 2023.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Most of the city's residents identify as Hispanic. As shown on Figure 3-2, the percentage of Hispanic residents increased from 73 percent in 2010 to 81 percent in 2023 Figure 3-2 Population Identifying as Hispanic, Reedley, 2010, 2023 90%
81%
80% 73%
70%
60%
50%
40%
28%
30%
19%
20%
10%
0%
2010 2023
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Not Hispanic or Latino Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table DP05, 2023.

Educational Attainment
Educational attainment in Reedley is moderate. As shown in Figure 3-3, approximately 16 percent of the population 25 years or older have a bachelor's degree or higher. This compares to 24 percent countywide. More than 45 percent of the citywide population have completed some college, compared to over 55 percent countywide.

Figure 3-3 Educational Attainment, 2023
City of Reedley
Less than 9th grade 21%
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 12%
High school graduate (includes... 21%
Some college, no degree 19%
Associate's degree 11%
Bachelor's degree 10%
Graduate or professional degree 6%
PEH-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Fresno County
Less than 9th grade 12%
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 9%
High school graduate (includes... 23%
Some college, no degree 23%
Associate's degree 9%
Bachelor's degree 16%
Graduate or professional degree 8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table DP02, 2023.

Occupations
Table 3-4 shows the breakdown of employment by sector (grouping). Nearly half of Reedley's employed residents are employed in the sectors of:
• Educational services, health care, and social assistance (26 percent) • Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and mining (23 percent) The educational, health, and social assistance sector historically has higher salaries than other top sectors, including employment in agriculture, manufacturing, and retail. Other higher paying sectors in the city include professional, scientific and management (five percent); public administration (five percent), construction (three percent); finance, insurance, and real estate (three percent); and information (less than 1 percent).

Table 3-4 Employment by Industry, Reedley, 2023
USE Total Percent
Civilian employed population 16 years and over 10,267 100% Educational services, and health care and social assistance 2,711 26% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 2,359 23% Manufacturing 919 9%
Retail trade 794 8%
Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 536 5%
Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste 531 5%
management services
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services 529 5% Public administration 483 5%
Other services, except public administration 404 4%
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Industry Total Percent
Wholesale trade 394 4%
Construction 313 3%
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 271 3% Information 23 <1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table DP03, 2023.

Household Income
The 2023 ACS estimates Reedley's median household income is $62,923. This is significantly lower than in Fresno County ($71,434) and California ($96,334), as shown in Table 3-5. Between 2015 and 2023, the median household income in the city increased by 42 percent from $44,228 to $62,923; however, this growth was less than experienced in the County (+58 percent) and State (+56 percent).

This lower income level can be attributed to Reedley's occupational mix (see Table 3-4), which includes a significant percentage of residents in the fields of agriculture, forestry, fishing, and mining; manufacturing; and retail trades.

Table 3-5 Median and Mean (average) Household Income, 2015-2023 Percent Growth CAGR
2015 2020 2023 2015-2023 2015-2023
Reedley
Median $44,228 $45,850 $62,923 42% 4.5%
Mean (Average) $56,513 $64,881 $84,202 49% 5.1%
Fresno County
Median $45,233 $57,109 $71,434 58% 5.9%
Mean (Average) $63,314 $79,175 $ 97,005 53% 5.5%
California
Median $61,818 $ 78,672 $ 96,334 56% 5.7%
Mean (Average) $87,877 $111,622 $136,730 56% 5.7%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table DP03, 2015, 2020, 2023.

PEH-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Employment and Jobs
Existing Jobs
Reedley had approximately 8,632 jobs in 2022 (Table 3-6). This represents about two percent of the total jobs countywide (414,750) in the same year. For comparison, in 2022, the City of Sanger had about 9,800 jobs while the City of Selma had about 9,280 jobs.

Recent Job Growth
Between 2010 and 2023, the number of jobs in the city increased from 8,012 to 8,350 (Table 3-6).

Although the city added nearly 350 jobs during this period, this represents a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of less than 1 percent, indicating very little growth in recent years. During this period; however, the percentage of low wage jobs paying less than $1,250 per month decreased from

44.1 percent to 24.6 percent, likely due to the increase in the statewide minimum wage during this time.

Notably, the percentage of workers aged 55 or older in the city increased by approximately four percent between 2010 and 2015, suggesting that older working age adults reentered the workforce. As of 2023, workers over 55 hold a quarter of jobs in the city.

Table 3-6 Jobs in Reedley, 2010-2023
2010 2015 2020 2023
All Jobs 8,012 7,699 8,632 8,350
Percentage of Jobs paying less

44.1% 41.3% 34.9% 26.5%
than $1,250 per month
Workers age 55 or older 20.9% 24.5% 24.8% 24.6%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, LEHD OnTheMap Work Area Profile Analysis, https://onthemap.ces.census.gov
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Projected Job Growth
According to projections published by Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG), the number of jobs in Reedley is expected to increase by more than 1,800 jobs between 2022 and 2060 (Table 3-7). This projection assumes a 0.53 percent annual growth rate over this period, which is equivalent to the annual growth rate experienced between 2010 and 2023 (<1 percent), as discussed in the previous paragraph.

For comparison, similarly sized cities (Sanger and Selma) are projected to see the number of jobs increase by 1,900 jobs and 3,430 jobs, respectively.

Table 3-7 Employment Projections by Jurisdiction Sphere of Influence Jurisdiction 20922 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 Total Jobs
County Total 414,750 421,140 432,740 442,600 454,800 466,150 476,330 484,780 491,920 Clovis SOI 40,550 41,260 43,220 44,860 46,580 48,130 49,430 50,390 51,050 Coalinga SOI 5,010 5,020 5,100 5,170 5,250 5,320 5,380 5,420 5,460 Firebaugh SOI 2,230 2,160 2,320 2,450 2,590 2,720 2,840 2,950 3,050 Fowler SOI 3,990 4,190 4,390 4,680 5,000 5,290 5,590 5,810 6,010 Fresno SOl (incl. 260,210 260,420 265,950 271,760 277,970 283,670 288,820 293,150 296,870 county islands)
Huron SOl 1,080 1,140 1,170 1,230 1,280 1,340 1,390 1,430 1,460 Kerman SOl 4,320 4,560 4,860 5,160 5,470 5,760 5,990 6,170 6,280 Kingsburg SOI 5,240 5,320 5,580 5,880 6,210 6,500 6,760 6,970 7,140 Mendota SOI 1,830 1,820 1,960 2,060 2,160 2,250 2,330 2,390 2,430 Orange Cove SOI 960 970 990 1,020 1,050 1,080 1,100 1,120 1,130 Parlier SOI 2,550 2,540 2,610 2,700 2,790 2,880 2,970 3,040 3,100 Reedley SOI 8,120 8,400 8,520 8,800 9,100 9,370 9,610 9,800 9,940 Sanger SOI 9,800 9,720 10,050 10,340 10,660 10,960 11,240 11,480 11,700 San Joaquin SOI 650 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 690
Selma SOI 9,280 11,510 12,490 11,320 11,670 12,000 12,290 12,520 12,710 Unincorporated 58,920 61,480 62,890 64,580 66,360 68,210 69,910 71,450 72,900 Areas (excl. SOls)
Source: Fresno COG, 2023-2060 Growth Projections, November 21, 2024.

Major Employers
Major employers are listed in Table 3-8. Key characteristics of these employers are as follows:
• Five of the largest employers in the city are in the agricultural production/packaging industry.

Agricultural employers often have an influx of seasonal workers at different times of the year, so the numbers reflected in Table 3-8 may vary widely at different times of the year. • Two housing providers are among the largest employers in the city, one of which is a senior housing facility.

PEH-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends • Various educational institutions are a major employer in Reedley that serve both city and regional residents with the college, Kings Canyon Unified School District, and adult education programs.

The Kings Canyon Unified School District employs approximately 200-250 staff and teachers across the five schools and district offices within the city.

Table 3-8 Major Local Employers
ndustr Company Size
Moonlight Companies Agriculture 2,000
Adventist Health, Reedley Healthcare 1,216
Brandt Farms Agriculture 350
Reedley College Education 292
Sun Valley Packing Agriculture 250
BW Integrated Systems Manufacturing 250
Kings Canyon Unified School District Education 200-250
Valley Regional Occupational Program Education 195
Gar Tootelian, Inc. Agriculture 175
Johnston Manufacturing Co Agriculture 75
Palm Village Retirement Community Housing 50
Sierra View Homes Housing 35
Sequoia Safety Council Emergency Medical Services 30
National Companies/Retailers Operating in Reedley
Enterprise Holdings Transportation National
Save Mart Grocery National
Starbucks Restaurant/Retail National
Oriental Trading Company Retail National
McDonalds Fast Food National
Big Lots Retail National
Dollar Tree Retail National
Carl's Jr. Fast Food National
Jamba Juice Fast Food National
7-Eleven Convenience Store National
Jack in the Box Fast Food National
Taco Bell Fast Food National
U-Haul Transportation/Moving/Storage National
Autozone Retail National
Subway Fast Food National
KFC Fast Food National
Source: Zippia.com, Reedley California Company Listing; Lensa.com, Reedley, CA; DataUSA, Reedley College (2023); ProPublica, Reedley Community Hospital (2024); DataQuest, Kings Canyon Unified School District (2024); Valley Regional Occupational Program Annual Report (2026).

Existing Employment
Figure 3-4 summarizes the labor force and employment in the city by year. According to the Employment Development Department, of the 12,400 individuals in the Reedley labor force in 2025, 10,700 were employed, which equates to approximately 86 percent of the labor force. Since 2015, the number of Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
employed residents has fluctuated greatly, from 10,500 in 2015, to a low of 9,200 in 2020, before increasing steadily over the last 5 years to 10,700 by 2025. When comparing the total labor force against employment, the data indicates that fluctuations in employment generally mirror changes to the total labor force, except for the decrease in employment experienced between 2015 and 2016. The data indicates that during this year, employment decreased at a significantly faster rate than the labor force, indicating a decrease in the jobs available to residents.

Figure 3-4 Employment, Reedley, 2015-2025
14,000
13,000
12,300 12,400
12,000
12,000 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,500
11,400 11,300
11,000
10,800 10,700
11,000 10,500 10,600
10,400
10,100
9,800 9,900 9,900 9,900
10,000 9,600
9,200
9,000
8,000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
« Employment - Labor Forcel
Source: California Employment Development Department, Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places, 2015 to 2025.

Unemployment Rates
Unemployment rates experienced in the city, county, and State have followed similar trends in recent years, as shown in Figure 3-5. Trend lines indicate high unemployment in 2010 but a sharp decrease in unemployment between 2010 and 2015. Between 2015 and 2020, the unemployment rate increased significantly in the city and State, reflecting the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Between 2020 and 2025, the unemployment rate decreased significantly in the county and state to lows of 8.7 percent and

6.1 percent, respectively. During this time, unemployment in Reedley remained stagnant, decreasing from just 15 percent to 13.5 percent..

PEH-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Figure 3-5 Unemployment Rate, 2010-2025
19%

16.40%
17%

15.0%
15% 13.5%

16.1%
- 13.6%
13%

9.80%
11% 13.2%

12.6%

8.7%
9%

9.5%
7%
5% 6.5%

6.1%
3%
2010 2015 2020 2025
m Reedley a Fresno Countyl we California
Source: California Employment Development Department, Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places, 2015 to 2025.

Housing
Housing is a critical component of health and well-being in a community. Individuals and families require safe, adequate, secure, and affordable housing to be a contributing member of society. In this section, an analysis of housing trends provides insight into Reedley today to identify potential challenges in the future.

Housing Stock
According to the American Community Survey, Reedley has had slow growth in the supply of housing, particularly from 2015 to 2023 (Figure 3-6). Between 2010 and 2023, 872 units were added to the City's housing stock (an average of 66 units per year). The annual growth rate varies during this period; however and was significantly higher from 2010 to 2015 at 127 units per year, compared to 28 units per year from 2015 and 2023.

A major contributor to the slow growth after 2015 was litigation filed in 2014 that stalled the approval of housing developments within the city through 2017 and therefore impacted the rate of construction in that time. Since the lawsuit was settled in 2017, the City has continued to receive, process and approve housing development applications and Building Permits. For example, according to the City of Reedley's Annual Progress Reports submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, between 2019 and 2024, Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
the City issued Building Permits for 718 housing units and issued 555 Certificates of Occupancy throughout the City.

State law requires each City and County to plan for its "fair share" of the statewide housing need. This fair share is calculated through a process called the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). For the sixth cycle RHNA projection period from 2023 to 2031, the City of Reedley had a RHNA of 1,463 units. The City continues to implement policies and procedures to encourage, incentivize, and support the development of housing.

Figure 3-6 Housing Units Over Time, Reedley
7,600
7,465
7,401
7,400
7,240
7,200
7,000
Total Housing Units 6,800
6,603
6,600
6,400
6,200
6,000
2010 2015 2020 2023
Year
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five Year Estimates, Table DPO4, 2023.

Housing Types
A mixture of housing types provides a range of choices in size and amenities, as well as affordability.

Figure 3-7 shows the breakdown of housing units by type in Reedley. Nearly 70 percent of the City's housing stock consists of single-unit homes, with multi-unit and mobile homes accounting for the remaining 30 percent. To meet the needs of a variety of households, the City recently updated the Zoning Code to encourage the development of housing types such as duplexes, triplexes, and medium and high-density multi-unit structures.

PEH-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Figure 3-7 Housing Units by Type
1-unit, detached 69.3%
1-unit, attached 2.1%
2 units 3.7%
3 or 4 units 6.2%
5 to 9 units 4.8%
10 to 19 units 5.0%
20 or more units 5.0%
Mobile home 3.8%
Boat, RV, van, etc. 0.0%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five Year Estimates, Table DP04, 2023.

Vacancy
Generally, a stable vacancy rate is between five to seven percent to allow for normal housing turnover.

As shown in Table 3-9, Reedley has a smaller percentage of total vacant units (3.5 percent) than Fresno County (5.8 percent) and California (7.6 percent). Further, the rental vacancy rate in Reedley is extremely low (less than 1 percent), indicating that rental units are in demand and new construction is needed. The homeowner vacancy rate in the city, county, and State is extremely low, indicating low turnover, limited available stock, and decreased housing mobility.

Table 3-9 Housing Occupancy
California Fresno County Reedley
Total housing units 14,532,683 342,003 7,465
Occupied housing units 13,434,847 92.4% 322,163 94.2% 7,204 96.5% Vacant housing units 1,097,836 7.6% 19,840 5.8% 261 3.5% Homeowner vacancy rate 0.9 0.9 2.0
Rental vacancy rate 4.1 3.0 <1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five Year Estimates, Table DP04, 2023.

Housing Costs
Figure 3-8 shows median home values in Reedley, as calculated by As of December 2025, there Zillow.com. Home values in the city have increased steadily in the were 28 homes available for last five years, from a median of $285,193 in 2021 to $378,907 by sale in Reedley. The median the end of 2025. This equates to an increase in value of more than list price for these homes 32 percent. If values continue to increase at the current pace, the was $453,267. median value is projected to increase to $500,000 by 2030.

Home values are similar in the county, where the median home value is $399,590, but substantially Lower than in the State, where the median home value is $755,330.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-15 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Assuming 30 percent of households income is spent on housing costs, the annual income needed to afford a house at the median income in Reedley is approximately $105,000. This is significantly higher than the median household income ($62,923). Including taxes and insurance, a median value property would require a payment of over $3,000 each month. The combination of low wages and high home values is a constraint to homeownership.

Figure 3-8 Zillow Home Value Index, 2021-2025
- Reedley
$388K
$355,287
$378,907
$367,977
$335K
$305K
$285,193
$275K
2021-06 2021-12 2022-06 2022-12 2023-06 2023-12 2024-06 2024-12 2025-06 2025-12 Source: Zillow.com, Reedley Housing Markey Summary.

The American Community Survey includes data on household rent through 2023. While this data is typically low', the data provides valuable insight into changing rents over time (Table 3-10). The median rent in Reedley in 2023 was $1,198. Since 2010 the median gross rent increased by approximately $300, a 49 percent increase over the 13-year period. This equates to a compound annual growth rate of 3.16 percent.

Table 3-10 Median Rent, City of Reedley, 2010-2023
Percent
Change
2010 2015 2020 2023 2010-2023
Median rent $799 $870 $973 $1,198 +49.9%
1 ACS data for median gross rent often seems low because it considers all rental units, including those rented with no rent paid (i.e., an accessory dwelling unit rented or occupied by a family member). This data provides a more precise understanding of the rental housing market than an analysis of advertised rents for currently available units.

PEH-16 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five Year Estimates, Table DP04, 2010, 2015, 2020, 2023.

American Community Survey rent data is also helpful for comparing rents by geographic area. As shown in Table 3-11, the 2023 median rent was significantly lower in the city ($1,198) and county ($1,300) than in California ($1,956). In Reedley, more than 70 percent of renters paid less than $1,500 on rent each month. Statewide, however, only around 30 percent of renters paid less than $1,500. While rents in the county are generally similar to those in Reedley, the county has a larger percentage of households paying at least $2,000 each month, indicating a greater percentage of newer and larger units that are rented at a higher price point.

Table 3-11 Gross Rent
California Fresno County Reedley
Occupied units paying rent 5,747,783 100% 13,8006 100% 3,186 100% Less than $500 214,317 3.7% 7,217 5.2% 198 6.2%
$500 to $999 459,335 8.0% 29,615 21.5% 602 18.9%
$1,000 to $1,499 1,027,130 17.9% 51,556 37.4% 1,613 50.6% $1,500 to $1,999 1,287,640 22.4% 28,160 20.4% 645 20.2% $2,000 to $2,499 1,106,223 19.2% 14,249 10.3% 66 2.1%
$2,500 to $2,999 668,969 11.6% 4,122 3.0% 40 1.3%
$3,000 or more 984,169 17.1% 3,087 2.2% 22 0.7%
Median (dollars) $1,956 $1,300 $1,198
No rent paid 192,253 5,624 71
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five Year Estimates, Table DP04, 2023.

Table 3-12 summarizes rental households in Reedley by the percentage of income spent on housing.

Generally, a household should spend no more than 30 percent of their income on housing to allow sufficient funds to pay bills, purchase necessary goods and services, and grow savings. In 2023, roughly half of all rental households in the city pay more than 30 percent of their income housing. These households are burdened by the cost of housing and likely experience difficulty covering unexpected expenses and growing savings.

Table 3-12 Rent as a Percentage of Household Income, City of Reedley Percent of Monthly Income Spent on Housing
Less than 15.0 percent 16.0%

15.0 to 19.9 percent 9.7%

20.0 to 24.9 percent 9.3%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 11.8%

30.0 to 34.9 percent 6.5%

35.0 percent or more 46.8%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five Year Estimates, Table DP04, 2023.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-17 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Age of Housing Stock
Table 3-13 and Figure 3-9 show the breakdown of housing units in Reedley based on the year the structure was originally built. As shown, production has varied by decade, peaking between 1990 and 2009.

Housing that is 30 years old may require costly maintenance and significant repairs (such as a re-roof, while homes over 50 years old often require major repairs or remodeling. Due to the limited construction in recent years, a high percentage of homes in Reedley are approximately 30 years old or more and likely require significant investment. Approximately 75 percent of the housing stock was constructed prior to 2000, 57 percent was constructed prior to 1990, and nearly half constructed prior to 1980.

Table 3-13 Housing Units by Year of Construction
Total Percent
Built 2020 or to 2025* 47 0.6%
Built 2010 to 2019 451 6.0%
Built 2000 to 2009 1,316 17.6%
Built 1990 to 1999 1,360 18.2%
Built 1980 to 1989 763 10.2%
Built 1970 to 1979 1,234 16.5%
Built 1960 to 1969 642 8.6%
Built 1950 to 1959 843 11.3%
Built 1940 to 1949 331 4.4%
Built 1939 or earlier 478 6.4%
*This data does not reflect the influx of Building Permits approved by the City following the resolution of litigation that stalled housing production in Reedley. See Section about "Housing Stock" earlier in this Chapter.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five-year estimates, Table DP04, 2023.

PEH-18 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Population, Employment, & Housing Existing Conditions and Trends Housing Tenure
Home equity is the largest single source of household wealth for most Americans. According to a survey conducted by the Federal Reserve, the net worth of the typical homeowner was 36 times that of the typical renter. The national homeownership rate has risen from around 40 percent before World War I| to 63 percent in 2014, although the rate dropped from a high of 69 percent in 2005 to 65 percent in 20252.

Housing tenure data for Reedley is available through the 2023 American Community Survey (Figure 3- 10). The data shows that in the city, county, and State, approximately 55 percent of residents own their homes and 45 percent are renters.

Figure 3-9 Housing Tenure, 2023
100%|
90%
80% 44.2%

45.2% 44.6%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%

54.8% 55.4% 55.8%
20%
10%
0%
Reedley Fresno County California
• Owner-occupied • Renter-occupied
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five-year estimates, Table DP04, 2023. 2 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Homeownership Rate in the United States, accessed at:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N, accessed January 2026.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PEH-19 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
References
California Employment Development Department, Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places, 2015 to 2025, period: 2026, available at:
https://labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/cgi/dataanalysis/areaselection.asp?tablename=labforce, accessed January 21, 2026.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Homeownership Rate in the United States, January 2026, available at:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N, accessed January 21, 2026.

Fresno COG, 2023-2060 Growth Projections, November 21, 2024, available at: https://www.fresnocog.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/11/2024-Fresno-COG-2023-2060-Growth-Projections-adopted-Nov_21_2024.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

Lensa, Reedley, CA Profile, available at: https://lensa.com/company/best-companies-in-reedley-ca, accessed January 21, 2026.

U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies, LEHD On TheMap Work Area Profile Analysis, 2023, available at: https://onthemap.ces.census.govl, accessed January 21, 2026.

U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-year Estimates, Table DP02, 2023.

U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five-year estimates, Table DP04, 2023.

U.S. Census Bureau, ACS Five-year estimates, Table DP05, 2010, 2023.

U.S. Census Bureau, ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table DP03, 2015, 2020, 2023.

U.S. Census Bureau, QuickFacts, 2025, available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/, accessed January 21, 2026.

Zillow, Reedley Housing Markey Summary, 2025, available at: https://www.zillow.com/home- values/97392/reedley-ca-93649, accessed January 21, 2026.

Zippia, Reedley California Company Listing, 2026, available at: https://www.zippia.com/company/best-biggest- companies-in-reedley-ca/; accessed January 2026.

PEH-20 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 4 Circulation
This chapter describes existing transportation and mobility trends in Reedley. An understanding of current conditions and trends helps inform planning for the future transportation network serving Reedley and its surrounding communities. The discussion provides context on the city's transportation system and travel characteristics, summarizes transportation trends by mode, and identifies planned improvements that may influence how people and goods move throughout Reedley over time.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Key Findings
Key findings of transportation trends in Reedley are described below:
• Reedley's population is consistently growing, indicating a possible stress on infrastructure as more people live, work, and play in the city.
• Reedley is isolated from State highways, limiting access to rural areas. • Reedley's workforce primarily commutes by driving a personal vehicle to employment centers outside of the city.
• The city's active transportation network is well connected, and while there are gaps, the City is making progress towards addressing them.
• Transit ridership has generally declined but remains stable and a key source of mobility for disadvantaged communities i.e., seniors, persons with disabilities, and low-income groups. • Agricultural workers, seniors, and persons with disabilities utilize carpool and vanpool services. • As the electric vehicle transition increases in Reedley, the City will encourage the construction of electric vehicle charging infrastructure to meet demand.

Roadway System
The city of Reedley is nestled along the Kings River, with key points of access being Manning Avenue and Olson Avenue because they are the only city streets that cross the river. Downtown Reedley is comprised of a grid street system that is bisected by the San Joaquin Valley Railroad (SJVRR) and bounded by North Avenue, Reed Avenue, Dinuba Avenue, and East Avenue. Reedley is isolated from the State highway system, and is located over eight miles from each nearest State highway such as State Route (SR) 99, SR 180, and SR 63.

The Circulation Element in the 2030 General Plan describes the roadway functional classifications below. For each classification, generalized roadway right-of-way, street profile, access and design requirements have been established. Figure 4-1 shows the roadway functional classes in Reedley.

Freeway
Freeways are major routes designed to carry large traffic volumes over long distances. Access is controlled, and grade separations and median strips are used to separate lanes of traffic moving in different directions. There are no freeways within Reedley, the nearest freeways are SR 99 to the west, SR 63 to the east, and SR 180 to the north. Freeways are owned, operated, and managed by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).

C-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Expressway
Expressways are roads designed to carry traffic volumes intermediate between freeways and major arterials. Opposing traffic is separated by wide medians, but speeds are usually somewhat lower than freeways. Access is fully controlled. A portion of an expressway exists within City limits along Manning Avenue between the western City limits and the Manning Avenue and | Street intersection.

Major Arterial
Major arterials are intended to provide a high vehicular capacity along high volume corridors. Examples within Reedley include Manning Avenue and Buttonwillow Avenue.

Arterial
Arterial streets are intended to provide access to collector streets and major traffic generators, such as retail or employment centers. Examples within Reedley include | Street, Reed Avenue, and 11th Street.

Collector
Collector streets are designed to channel traffic from arterial streets into the local street system and to manage short trips within neighborhoods. Examples of collectors include Parlier Avenue, Olsen Avenue, 10th Street, and 13th Street.

Local
Local streets primarily provide access to destinations within residential neighborhoods or business districts. Local streets include local through-streets, residential streets, and local cul-de-sacs. Examples include 8th Street, 9th Street, J Street, and K Street.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-1 Roadway Functional Classes
5 Kings
-E North-AvE
ESpringficldrAwe
O son-Ave
amrAve

0.5 1 1.5
Miles
City Limits ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSES
_ LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SO)) - Major Arterial - Arterial
* City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
- Collector
- GP2030 Study Area
• Local Street
- - - Future Arterial
- - - Future Collector

0.25 0.5
• Miles
Last updated: June 29, 2026
Source: Fresno County Geospatial OpenData
C-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Roadway Demand and Vehicle Trends
This section examines existing and historic travel demand in the city of Reedley. One measure of travel demand is vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Senate Bill (SB) 743 has phased out the use of level of service (LOS) in favor of using VMT for identifying transportation impacts under CEQA. Since there are no State highways that cross City limits, total VMT within the city is based on the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) for estimates of VMT on City-owned and maintained roads.

A summation of the published VMT on locally maintained roads gives the total VMT driven within City Limits. As shown in Figure 4-2, total VMT over the past 13-years has remained relatively constant with VMT peaking in 2018 at 216,010 miles. The estimated VMT in 2020 is 24 percent less than 2019 VMT, indicating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. From 2010 to 2023, local VMT has declined by 15 percent.

Figure 4-2 Estimated Local VMT per Year
Estimated VMT by Year
(2010-2023)
250,000
200,000
150,000

ESTIMATED VMT
100,000
50,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 YEAR
Source: Caltrans Public Road Data, Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Figure 4-3 shows the change in Reedley's population over time from 2010 to 2025. The California Department of Finance estimates indicate that population in Reedley has increased since 2010, although it leveled off between 2015 and 2022. As shown, the population grew from 24,194 in 2010 to 26,603 in 2025, resulting in an estimated average annual growth rate of 0.64 percent, as shown by the blue line in Figure 4-3.

VMT per capita is a common metric used to give an estimate of the average number of miles driven by each resident. Dividing the VMT estimates from Figure 4-2 by the Figure 4-3 population yields the VMT per capita results presented in Figure 4-4. VMT per capita has fluctuated slightly with a peak in 2018.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-3 Population Estimates for the City of Reedley City of Reedley Population
27,000
26,500
26,000
25,500
25,000

POPULATION
24,500
24,000
23,500
23,000
22,500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 YEAR
Source: California Department of Finance
Figure 4-4 Estimated Total Local VMT Per Capita
Estimated VMT Per Capita

10.00 9.00

8.00 7.00

6.00 5.00

4.00 3.00

2.00 1.00

0.00 2010 2011 20122013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Year
A primary and well-understood purpose of a trip is commuting (i.e., travel to and from work). Based on the American Community Survey (ACS), Reedley residents travel an average of 23 minutes to commute to work. This number has remained steady from 2010 to 2023, with an initial 24 minutes in 2010 and a maximum of 26 minutes in 2018. Figure 4-5 shows the mean travel time to work per year. Compared C-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
to Fresno County as a whole, Reedley commuters travel time to work is approximately one to two minutes longer. Figure 4-6 depicts travel time to work difference between Reedley and Fresno County.

This travel time to work is reflective of Reedley's isolation from State highways and rural location as workers may travel to other cities for work.

Figure 4-5 Mean Travel Time to Work - Reedley Workers
Mean Travel Time to Work
26 (Minutes)
24 .... ....0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Year
.••. Reedley
Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-6 Mean Travel Time to Work - Reedley vs Fresno County Mean Travel Time to Work
Reedley vs Fresno County
26 2.
24 Mean Travel Time to Work (Minutes) 23
......•
22 21
20 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Year
....O..... Fresno County ...... Reedley
Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates
Vehicle occupancy of worker vehicles is derived from the aggregate number of vehicles by workers and the total number of workers. Figure 4-7, illustrates the census-estimated average number of workers per car, truck, or van over the last decade, from 2010-2023. According to the ACS, the average worker per vehicle is approximately one worker per vehicle. Average vehicle occupancy peaked in 2021 at 1.16 with a low of 1 during 2017. Additionally approximately 18 percent of households have two or more vehicles available, indicating that individual workers in households are likely to have their own vehicle and travel to work alone.

C-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-7 Average Vehicle Occupancy per Year
Vehicle Occupancy

1.19 1.16

1.13 1.13 1.13

1.14 1.10 1.19 1.10

1.09 VEHICLE OCCUPANCY 1.09 1.08

1.07 1.05

1.04 1.04 1.02

1.0 0.99
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 YEAR
Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates
According to the US Census OnTheMap' tool, in 2022, the number of workers that live in Reedley but work elsewhere was over 8,000, while the number of workers who work in Reedley but live elsewhere was approximately 6,877 and intra-city commuters were nearly 2,000. As shown in Figure 4-8, approximately 48 percent of the workforce live in Reedley but work elsewhere. With a large portion of workers leaving the city for work, this is supportive of the travel time being over 20 minutes for drivers commuting to work.

Figure 4-8 Labor Force Inflow and Outflow
Inflow/Outflow job Counts in 2022
All Workers
6,877 8,047
1,988 6.877 - Employed in Selection Area, Live Outside
8,047 - Live in Selection Area, Employed Outside
1,988 - Employed and Live in Selection Area
1 U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Source: US Census, OnTheMap (2022)
Reedley is located in Fresno County, in the San Joaquin Valley, which has a large agricultural community that may commute long distances. Commuters to (or from) other cities may commute to one of the nearby cities in Fresno and Tulare Counties, such as Dinuba, Parlier, Sanger, Selma, and Kingsburg. The largest city in Fresno County is Fresno, which is approximately 24 miles northwest of Reedley. Figure 4-9 illustrates the distance and direction workers travel from Reedley.

Figure 4-9 Job Counts by Distance/Direction
Job Counts by Distance/Direction in 2022
All Workers
N
Jobs by Distance - Work Census Block to
NW NE
Home Census Block
2022
Count Share
W E
500 Total All Jobs 100.0%
8,865
1,500
Less than 10 miles 4,444 50.1%
2,500
110 to 24 miles 1,989 22.4%
SW SE
•25 to 50 miles 826 9.3%
Greater than 50 miles 1,606 18.1%
Source: US Census Bureau LODES Data
Safety
A review of collision data is one way of measuring safety on the roadway system and driver behavior within an area. Collision data from the 2014 to 20242 was analyzed for any revealing trends or safety concerns in Reedley.

As shown in Figure 4-10, throughout the 10-year period, an average of 37 collisions occurred annually for a total of 402 collisions. Throughout the 10-year period, the severity of collisions are primarily complaint of pain or visible injury, while fatal and severe injury collisions account for 7 percent of all collisions. Figure 4-11 and Figure 4-12 illustrate all collision severities throughout the 10-year period by location and density to identify locations with a high number of collisions.

Throughout the 10-year period, there have been a total of 28 fatal or severe injury collisions (Figure 4- 13). Fatal and severe injury (FSI) collisions in Reedley are relatively low compared to other severities.

Of all fatal and severe injury collisions, 68 percent were severe injury, indicating that severe injury collisions make up the majority of FSI collisions (Figure 4-14). 2 Collision data was obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Note that 2024 data is provisional and subject to change. TIMS data does not include Property Damage Only (PDO) collisions.

C-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-10 Collisions per Year by Severity
Collisions per Year by Severity
60 50
40 30
20 10
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
YEAR
• Complaint of Pain • Visible Injury Severe Injury i Fatal Source: Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS)
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-11 All Collisions Heatmap (2014-2024)
ing Avo
Wais
untsman Ave
0 1.5
Miles
City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
Г City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
- GP2030 Study Area
Reedley Collisions (2014-2024)
Sparse
Dense
0 0.25 0.5
• Miles
Last updated: May 26, 2026
C-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-12 All Collisions by Severity
W CypresstAv E Cypress Ave
Vort
BDuff Ave
08000900.

S Button
8 wentsman Ave?

0.5 1.5
Mies
City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
• City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
- GP2030 Study Area

COLLISION SEVERITY
• Fatal
Severe Injury
• Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain 0.25 0.5
] Miles
Last updated: May 26, 2026
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-13 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions per Year Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions per Year
4 3

NUMBER OF COLLISIONS
1 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YEAR
o-Severe Injury --Fatal
Figure 4-14 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions Total

FATAL AND SEVERE INJURY COLLISIONS
Fatal
32%
Severe
68%
Another way to look at collision trends is by primary collision factor (PCF). The primary collision factor is the maneuver or action that led to a collision. Figure 4-15 shows the most common PCF violations? in Reedley. Although unsafe speeds and automobile right-of-way were the most prominent collision factors by county, collisions caused by these factors most often resulted in a PCF violation category of 3 Primary collision factors that resulted in ten or more collisions throughout the ten-year period are shown.

C-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
complaint of pain. Over 10-year period, there were over 40 DUI collisions, making up 21 percent of FSI collisions and 32 percent of all severe injury collisions (Figure 4-16).

Figure 4-15 Collision Severity by Primary Collision Factor Collision Severity by PCF Violation Category
120
100
80 NUMBER OF COLLISION
20 DUI Unsafe Following Wrong Side Improper Automobile Pedestrian Pedestrian Traffic Signals Speed Too Closely ot Road Türning Right-of-Way Right-of-Wav Violation and Signs

PCF VIOLATION CATEGORY
• Fatal I Severe Injury # Visible Injury • Complaint of Pain Figure 4-16 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions by Primary Collision Factor FSI Collisions by PCF Violation Category
6 5
4 COLLISION COUNT
3 DUI Unsafe Wrong Side Improper Automobile Pedestrian Pedestrian Traffic Other Than Unsafe Unknown Speed of Road Turning Right of Right of Violation Signals and Driver (or Starting or Way Way Signs Pedestrian) Backing

PCF VIOLATION CATEGORY
#l Fatal @ Severe
Additionally, collision type can reveal the most common types of collisions and the related severity. As shown in Figure 4-17, the most common collision type is rear end, primarily resulting in complaint of pain injuries. However, 58 percent of rear end collisions are attributed to unsafe speed as the primary collision factor (Figure 4-18). This indicates that vehicles are traveling at unsafe speeds for roadway conditions and are unable to stop in time as traffic ahead may be stopped.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-15 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-17 Number of Collisions by Collision Type
Collision Severity by Collision Type
180
160
140
120

NUMBER OF COLLISION
80 60
40 20
Head-On Sideswipe Rear End Broadside Hit Object Overturned Vehicle/Pedestrian

COLLISION TYPE
1l Fatal • Severe Injury • Visible Injury # Complaint of Pain Figure 4-18 Collision Type by Primary Collision Factor
Collision Type by PCF Violation Category
120
100
Collision Count 60
40 20
DUI Unsate Automobile edestria Traffic Signals
improper Pedestriar
Speed Turning Right-of-Wav ight-of-Wa Violation and Signs l Head-On | Sideswipe Rear End Broadside l Hit Object Overturned Vehicle/Pedestrian Collisions with bicyclists and pedestrians were also analyzed to determine safety concerns and trends related to active transportation. Pedestrian- and bicyclist-involved collisions accounted for 22 percent of all collisions throughout the 10-year period. Of these collisions, 54 percent involve pedestrians, while C-16 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
46 percent involve bicyclists. As shown in Figure 4-19, pedestrian and bicyclists collisions primarily result in visible injury or complaint of pain, however, 13 percent of pedestrian and bicyclists collisions are fatal or severe injury, which is almost double the FSI for all collisions.

Notably, approximately 54 percent of bicyclists and 41 percent of pedestrian collisions occur at intersections (Figure 4-20). Figure 4-21 and Figure 4-22 illustrate bicyclist and pedestrian collisions by Location and location density.

Figure 4-19 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Collisions by Severity Pedestrian and Bicyclists Collisions by Severity
50 45
40 30
NUMBER OF COLLISIONS 25
20 15
10 Complaint of Pain Visible Injury Severe Injury Fatal

SEVERITY
# Pedestrians • Bicyclists
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-17 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-20 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Total Collisions vs Intersection Collisions Pedestrian and Bicyclists Total Collisions vs
Intersection Collisions
80 70
60 50
40 30
20 10
Pedestrians Bicyclists
• Total Collisions • Intersection Collisions
C-18 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-21 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Involved Collisions by Location W Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave
00 c • 00 •
© W North Ave
•E North Ave
WEymann Ave
• BOuff Ave
S Reed Ave
W Huntsman Avia
0 0.5 1.5 2
Miles
• City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
_ City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area
• Pedestrian Accident
• Bicycle Accident

0.25 0.5
Miles
Last updated: May 26, 2026
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-19 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-22 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Involved Collision Density W Cypr E Cypress Ave
WEymann Ave
S Reed Ave
W Huntsman Ad
152 Mies
- City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area
Reedley Pedestrian and Bicyclist Collisions
(2014-2024)
Sparse
Dense

0.25 0.5
] Miles
Last updated: May 26, 2026
C-20 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Active Transportation
Active transportation is a key component of the City of Reedley's broader mobility and public health strategies. The Reedley Active Transportation and Parkway Master Plan adopted in 2024 is aimed at guiding three key recommendations:

1. Expand and enhance the Reedley Parkway,

2. Expand the on-street bikeway network, and

3. Improve pedestrian connections.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, expanding these networks boosts physical activity, improves equity and safety, decreases vehicle-related injuries and deaths, and reduces air pollution from transportation.

Table 4-1 describes the different types of bikeways and examples in Reedley.

Measure C, a 30-year, half cent transportation sales tax approved by voters in 1986, plays a key role in funding active transportation projects across Fresno County including in the City of Reedley.

Approximately one-third of the funds goes to the 15 cities and Fresno County for local road improvements while another third is dedicated to improving State highways.

Additionally, a number of regional plans on active transportation were recently adopted, including:
• City of Reedley Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan (2019) • Fresno County Regional Trails Plan (2021)
• Fresno County Regional Active Transportation Plan (2024) • City of Reedley Active Transportation and Parkway Master Plan (2024) Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-21 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Table 4-1 Bikeway Classifications
Bikeway Classification Description Example
Typically called shared-use paths or
multi-use trails. Class I bikeways are a
Class I (Bike Path) Reedley Parkway
paved off-street path shared between
bicyclists and pedestrians.

A dedicated on-street lane for bicyclists
East Avenue and
Class II (Bike separated from traffic with paint. Class I| bike lanes may be painted green for portions of Manning Lane)
Avenue
greater visibility.

Class IIB bike lanes have additional There are no Class IIB Class IIB (Buffered
painted buffer space to increase Buffered Bike Lanes
Bike Lane)
separation of bicyclists and vehicles. in Reedley
Bicyclists and vehicles share lanes.

West Olson Avenue
Class III (Bike Bicycle route signage and pavement
and 11t Street from l
Route) markings (sharrows) may be used to
Street to F Street.
increase driver awareness.

Class IIIB Neighborhood greenways include There are no Class (Neighborhood additional traffic calming such as traffic IIIB Neighborhood Greenway/Bicycle circles and speed humps to naturally Greenways in Boulevard) decrease speed and volume of vehicles. Reedley Typically called a protected bike lane
and is characterized by a bike lane
physically separated from the vehicle
Class IV travel lanes. Physical separation can be East Huntsman Ave identified by a vertical barrier such as
bollards, parked vehicles, or flexible
posts.

Source: City of Reedley Active Transportation Parkway Master Plan (2024), Capital Region Transportation Council
Reedley has approximately 11.42 miles of designated bike paths and facilities. Notably, there are less than one mile of Class IV facilities. Table 4-2 and Table 4-3 list the number of miles of bikeways and sidewalks in Reedley per class and facility type. Figure 4-23 and Figure 4-24 shows existing and proposed bikeways in Reedley.

C-22 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Table 4-2 Existing Bikeway Mileage by Type
Existing Bikeway Mileage
Class | 3.50
Class I| 5.95
Class III 1.72
Class I 0.25
TOTAL 11.42
Source: City of Reedley Active Transportation Parkway Master Plan (2024) Table 4-3 Existing Pedestrian Network Mileage
Facility Type Total Road Mileage
No Sidewalks 13.73
Sidewalk on One Side of Street Only 11.96
Sidewalks on Both Sides of Street 62.88
TOTAL 88.57
Source: City of Reedley Active Transportation Parkway Master Plan (2024) Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-23 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-23 Existing Bicycle Network
FRANK

PARLIER

COLUMBIA

REED BUTTONWILLOW

MANNING
NORTH
EAST

SPRINGFIELD
G
TENTH Reedley
DINUBA
OLSON
- Shared Use Path (Class I)
- Bike Lane (Class II)
Source: Fresno COG Bikeway Map (2024) Bike Route (Class III) N Separated Bikeway (Class IV)
C-24 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-24 Proposed Bikeways
Recommended Bikeways and Trails
Reedley Parkway
South Ave
Recommended Bikeways
Reed Ave Frankwool Enhance Existing Class II Bike Lanes Bike Lanes (Class 11/1IB)
Bike Boulevard (Class IIIB)
Shared Use Path/Sidepath (Class I)
Parlier Ave
Separated Bike Lanes (Class IV)
Existing Bikeways
Columbia Ave
Shared Use Path (Class I)
Separated Bikeway (Class IV)
Manning Ave
Myrtle Ave
North Ave
10th St Springfield Ave
Eymann Ave
Early Ave Buttonwillow Ave Zumwalt Ave
RAVEL
Dinuba Ave
Olson Ave
East Huntsman Ave
Reed Ave Hope Ave
0 0.5 1 mi
East Floral Ave
Source: City of Reedley Active Transportation Parkway Master Plan (2024) Only a small percentage of workers commute using active transportation modes. In Reedley, bicycling to work increased from 2010 to 2016 by 71 percent, however since 2016 bicycling to work has declined by nearly 100 percent. Walking to work declined significantly from 2010 to 2018 by 55 percent but is trending upwards. Figure 4-25 and Figure 4-26 show the full trend in bicycle and pedestrian commuting from 2010 to 2023.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-25 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-25 Percentage of People Who Biked to Work, 2010-2023.

Percentage of People Who Biked to Work

1.4%

1.2%

1.0%
.8%

PERCENTAGE
).6%

0.4%

0.2%

0.0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 YEAR
Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates
Figure 4-26 Percentage of People Who Walked to Work
Percentage of People Who Walked to Work

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

PERCENTAGE

1.0%

0.5%

0.0%
20102011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 YEAR
Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates
C-26 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Transit
There are multiple transit options that serve Reedley. The Fresno County Rural Transit Agency serves Reedley and its key destinations. The Tulare County Regional Transit Agency (TCRTA) operates one route with transit service between Dinuba and Reedley.

Fresno County Rural Transit Agency
The Fresno County Rural Transit Agency (FCRTA) is a regional bus operator that provides transit services to rural communities in Fresno County. The FCRTA runs 10 fixed inter-city routes, 3 of which provide route connections to Reedley: Sanger Express, Orange Cove, and the Kingsburg-Reedley route.

Additionally, there is an inter-city subservice in Reedley. Figure 4-27 shows the FCRTA routes serving the Reedley.

The Sanger Express and the Kingsburg-Reedley routes have only one destination in Reedley at Reedley College. The Orange Cove route provides connections between Reedley, Orange Cove, Parlier, Sanger, and Fresno. Reedley transit offers inter-city stops.

FCRTA has made significant progress towards an electric fleet, with implementation of electric vehicle chargers and purchasing electric vans and buses.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-27 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-27 FCRTA Bus Routes
Fresno County Rural Transit Agency
Services Map
CRT
or band
Merced County
To Los
03nO3 Cold Springs
Madera County Kanchen f
Yosemite
Firebaugh
Clovis
Fresno!
Mendota Kerman
o Sanger Squaw
• Valley
Tranqu Rey o
Raisin
Fowler Reedley 0 Orange Cove
San
Parlier
Joaquin Selma
→ Dinuba
Kingsburg
Laton To Tularo Visalia
Five Tulare County
Hardwick
Grangeville
Hanford
Transit Stops Laton Transit
Kings County Kingsburg to Reedley College Transit • Orange Cove Intercity Transit • Huron
Auberry Transit • San Joaquin Intercity Transit
Coalinga
• Coalinga Intercity Transit • Sanger - Reedley College Del Rey Transit Southeast Transit
• Dinuba Connection Westside Transit
Firebaugh-Mendota Transit wu KART Transit
Updated:1/1/2019 Huron Inter-City Transit
Sources: Esti, USGS. NOAA
Source: Fresno County Rural Transit Agency
Transit ridership in Fresno County has faced notable fluctuations over the past several years, particularly due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, FCRTA recent ridership has indicated a return to pre-pandemic ridership and services4
Based on total passengers, pre-pandemic ridership for all Reedley serving transit options (FY19) combined was over 100,000 passengers. Ridership significantly dropped in FY20 and FY21 by 24 percent and 47 percent, respectively. In FY21, the low ridership due to the pandemic resulted in the temporary termination of the Kingsburg-Reedley route. Ridership in FY22-24 averaged a 16 percent recovery rate and the reinstatement of the Kingsburg-Reedley route. Figure 4-29 illustrates these ridership trends from 2019 through 2024.
4 FCRTA 2026-2030 Short Range Transit Plan (2025).

C-28 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
A large portion of passengers that utilize FCRTA and its supporting Reedley connection are from disadvantaged users (i.e., seniors, disabled). On transit routes that serve Reedley, disadvantaged users made up between 35 percent to 45 percent of all ridership between FY19 and FY24. Figure 4-30 illustrates FCRTA routes and their passenger breakdown. Figure 4-30 illustrates total FCRTA ridership for routes that serve Reedley from 2019 to 2024.

In terms of commuting to work, the share of residents using public transit in Reedley has declined from 2010 to 2023, reaching a peak in 2016 of two percent. This commute mode continuously declined until it reached 0 percent in 2021, likely attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Figure 4-31 shows these trends from 2010 to 2023. The percentage of workers who use public transit in Reedley is virtually nonexistent, since 2020, while Fresno County workers using transit has slightly decreased, indicating a lack of lifestyle shift as workers are relying on other modes of transportation to get to work. Figure 4- 33 shows the percentage of workers who commute by public transit in Reedley and Fresno County.

Figure 4-28 Bus Passengers by Route (2019-2024)
FCRTA Total Passengers
Reedley Connections
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000

TOTAL PASSENGERS
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
- Kingsburg-Reedley - Orange Cove Reedley - Sanger Transit Source: FCRTA, Transit Productivity Evaluation (2024, 2022, 2021) Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-29 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-29 FCRTA Total Passengers by Route (Disadvantaged Breakdown) FCRTA System Ridership
Reedley Connections
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000 PASSENGERS
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Sanger Transit Reedley Orange Cove Sanger Transit Reedley Orange Cove Reedley Orange Cove Reedley Reedley Transit Reedley Orange Cove Kingsburg-Reedley Kingsburg-Reedley Sanger Transit Kingsburg-Reedley FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
• General Public • Disadvantaged (Seniors, Disabled)
Source: FCRTA, Transit Productivity Evaluation (2024, 2022, 2021) Figure 4-30 FCRTA Total Passengers Combined
FCRTA Total Passengers
Kingsburg, Orange Cove, Reedley, and Sanger Transit Combined 120,000
110,000
100,000

TOTAL PASSENGERS
30,000
20,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
YEAR
Source: FCRTA, Transit Productivity Evaluation (2024, 2022, 2021) C-30 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-31 Percentage of People who Took Public Transit to Work Percentage of People who Took Public Transit
to Work

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

PERCENTAGE

1.0%

0.5%

0.0%
20102011201220132014201520162017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 YEAR
Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates
Figure 4-32 Percentage of People who Took Transit to Work (Reedley vs. Fresno County) Workers Commuting by Public Transit

2.50%

2.00%

1.50%

PERCENTAGE

1.00%

0.50%

0.00%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
YEAR
•Reedley @ Fresno County
Source: Fresno County Department of Public Health, Healthy Fresno County Data Dashboard.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-31 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Dinuba Connection
The Tulare County Regional Transit Agency (TCRTA) operates one route with transit service between Dinuba and Reedley.

The Dinuba Connection is an inter-county connection between Dinuba and Reedley. This service provides residents of Reedley with expanded transit connections to Tulare County cities such as Dinuba, Visalia, and Tulare. The TCRTA routes are shown in Figure 4-33 while Figure 4-34 shows the Dinuba Connection Reedley stop locations.

Figure 4-33 Tulare County Regional Transit Agency Routes Reedley
Orosi
East Crosi
Dinuba Commuter Routes
• Seville • C10
Three Rivers C20
C30
Woodlake
C40
C70
Visalia C80
(90
11X
-VT Route 1488
Farmersville Dinuba Connection (DC)
Exeter
sE Tule River (TR)
Tulare C40
Lindsay
Springville
C9I
Porterville
Tipton Woodville
Tule River
Poplar-Cotton
Reservation
Center
CS0
Terra Bella
Ducor
Earlimart
Richgrove
Delano
Source: Tulare County Regional Transit Agency
C-32 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-34 Dinuba Connection - Reedley Route
J19
Reedley
E Dinuba Ave
E Floral Ave
NORTH
DINUBA Road 88
Road 56 Road 64
J40 (140
Source: Tulare County Regional Transit Agency
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-33 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Freight and Goods Movement
The Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) of 1982 designated certain highways as truck routes.

These routes are specifically designed to accommodate longer and wider trucks than those typically allowed on standard roads. The Act permits motor carrier operation of 48-foot and 53-foot (kingpin to rear axle) semi-trailers on the national highway network and allowed states to permit these "STAA vehicles" on State and local routes. Designation of STAA routes is premised on engineering and safety standards (i.e., adequate footprint to accommodate 48-53-foot truck turn radius requirements, gross vehicle weight, vertical clearance height etc.) 5.

While Reedley does not have any STAA designated routes within City limits, there are STAA routes in surrounding communities as shown in Figure 4-35. Additionally, the City has its own defined truck routes in Section 6-1-66 of the City Code as follows:
"..trucks, trailers, wagons and other vehicles which shall exceed in weight ten thousand 10,000) pounds, or a maximum gross weight limit of five (5) tons." The City Code does not permit trucks to travel on non-designated truck routes unless it is necessary to reach its destination for delivery or loading. City-designated truck routes are shown in Figure 4-36.

Along with the truck routes available for freight and goods movements, Reedley also hosts one freight rail route. The railroad bisects Reedley between | Street and G Street throughout City limits and crosses the Kings River. The railroad is owned and operated by the San Joaquin Valley Railroad (SJVRR). Figure 4-36 shows the railroad in Reedley.

Figure 4-35 City of Reedley and Nearby STAA Truck Routes A STAA Truck TA/SA Ramps
→ TA/SA Direction on Local Street Miley Orange Co
Uva
Parlier Lacjac
California Truck Networks
- National Network Route (STAA)
Selma
- Terminal Access Route (STAA) Ivory NORTH DINUBA
- California Legal Route Tokay
Sultana Orosi
California Legal Advisory Route
- Special Restriction Cutien
Delft Colony
Source: Caltrans QuickMap
5 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 35401.7
6 Reedley City Code, Section 6-1-6.

C-34 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 4-36 City of Reedley Designated Truck Routes
mE Sumner Aver
W Parlier Ave
W Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave
EsMansing Ave
E North Ave
E Springfield Ave
WEymann Ave
E Duff Ave
•W DinubarA:

E Olson Ave
0 0.5 1.5
] Miles
City Limits
" LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (5O1)
_ City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SO1)
- GP2030 Study Area

ROUTE CLASS
- Truck Route
- - Trucks Prohibited
A Railroad Tracks

0.25 0.5
• Miles
Last updated: July 6, 2026
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-35 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Aviation
The Reedley Municipal Airport is the only publicly-owned airport by the City of Reedley. The airport is approximately four miles north of the city. The Reedley Municipal Airport is classified as a local general aviation airport and is considered a community facility?. The nearest commercial airport is the Fresno International Airport located in Fresno.

Transportation Demand Management
Transportation demand management (TDM) refers to strategies that promote alternatives to single occupant vehicles. Active transportation (walking and bicycling), transit promotion, use of micro- mobility, carpool and vanpool, park-and-ride, and tolling are examples of TDM strategies. Certain types of intelligent transportation systems (ITS), the use of telecommunications in transportation infrastructure, can also be considered TDM.

The Fresno Council of Government (FCOG) identifies TDM measures in its 2022 RTP/SCS. These measures include carpool and vanpool programs, such as eTtrip Rule 9410, Measure C programs, and CalVans.

Carpool and Vanpool
In the Fresno COG RTP/SCS, carpool and vanpool are identified strategies that support the region in meeting its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction target. Carpool and vanpool options in the region include Rule 9410, Measure C programs, and CalVans, as described below.

ETrip Rule 9410
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) Employer Based Trip Reduction Rule (Rule 9410), also known as the eTRIP rule, is a mandate that employers with more than 100 employees create an employer-trip reduction plan to encourage employees to carpool or use transit other than single occupancy vehicles. eTRIP is menu-based and requires employers to select items from a menu that fulfill a point-based criteria and regularly report to the air district. 7 Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (2023).

C-36 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Measure C Programs
In Reedley, there are multiple carpool and vanpool options offered through Measure C8.

Agricultural Worker Vanpool Program
Under Measure C, there is the Agricultural Worker Vanpool Program which provides agricultural workers in Fresno County with subsidies and reimbursements for transportation when using the Agricultural Worker Vanpool. The Measure C program requires trips to start in Fresno County and ridership ratio should be at 1:7, where seven riders are assigned to one driver. As of 2024, there are 27 certified Agricultural Worker Vanpools with 285 participants in Fresno County and its cities.

Commuter Vanpool Program and CarPerks
For commuters, there are two programs supported under Measure C - Commuter Vanpool Program and CarPerks. The Commuter Vanpool Program offers subsidies and reimbursements to qualified vanpools in Fresno County. This program is aimed at providing commuters with alternative transportation options and cost savings, while minimizing traffic congestion and improving air quality. This program requires vanpools to start and originate in Fresno County, a driver to rider ratio of 1:6, and run at least five days a week. As of 2024, there were 49 vanpools with 416 riders, which resulted in over one billion tons of CO2 saved. CarPerks is a Carpool Incentive Program which rewards carpoolers in Fresno County. The program requires users to be at least 18 years old and carpool to or from Fresno County. Carpoolers who log their commute trips receive points, which can be redeemed for prizes.

Senior Scrip Program
The Senior Scrip program under Measure C is a senior-specific ridesharing program that gives Fresno County residents aged 70+ affordable rides. This program is in partnership with GoGoGoGrandparent, Lyft, and Uber. The program provides seniors with a 75 percent discount on ride fares up to $200 a month. In 2024, there were over 9,000 participants with over 400 users being new. In 2024, local taxi providers supported 4,330 trips, while GoGoGoGrandparent scheduled nearly 11,000 trips for seniors.

CalVans
CalVans is offered through the California Vanpool Authority, which offers ridesharing services for employees, primarily utilized by agricultural employers. As of April 2024, there are 5 CalVans that serve Reedley out of 60 that serve Fresno County. As shown in Figure 4-37, Reedley accounts for approximately 11 percent of passenger trips of all CalVans in Fresno County. 8 Measure C, Regional Public Transit, 2024
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-37 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-37 CalVans Fresno County Trips
Unlinked CalVans Passenger Trips
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
Clovis Coalinga Firebaugh Fresno Huron Kingsburg Mendota Orange Cove Parlier Reedley CITY
Source: Calvans
Transportation System Management
Transportation system management programs increase existing roadway efficiency without the construction of new roadway infrastructure. In general, these range from operational improvements such as signal timing management, pavement management, and fix-it-first programs to Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) improvements.

Intelligent Transportation Systems
In 2015, Fresno COG developed a countywide Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Strategic Deployment Plan. This Plan is aimed at identifying ITS improvements to address recommendations from the Federal Highway Administration of ITS program standards. This Plan outlines priority projects throughout Fresno County that are to be implemented over a 20-year horizon.

In Reedley, the ITS Strategic Deployment Plan suggests ITS technologies that support arterial widening projects, including signs, detection, surveillance, signal control, and controller/firmware/software upgrades.
9 Fresno COG ITS Strategic Deployment Plan (2015).

C-38 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Operations and Infrastructure Strategies
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is the measure of the pavement quality and condition. The PCI scores pavement quality range from poor, (0-49), at risk (50-59), good (60-79), and excellent (80-100).

Pavement conditions within Fresno County and its 15 cities are rated to have fair to very poor pavement conditions. Figure 4-38 shows the average pavement conditions of Fresno County from 2008 to 2022.

According to the 2022 California Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment, the countywide average PCI for Fresno County and its cities is 59. The City of Reedley maintains approximately 76.5 miles of roadway'°, with an average citywide PCI of 51". Figure 4-39 illustrates countywide pavement conditions for Fresno County and its cities.

Figure 4-38 Fresno County Historical Pavement Condition Pavement Condition Trends
80 75
70 65
60 55
50 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Year
Source: California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment (2022) 10 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Public Road Data, 2023. 11 City of Reedley Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update, August 2025.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-39 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-39 Pavement Condition in Fresno County
Fresno County
Pavement Condition Index
Reported Estimated
Good (71-100) Good (71-100)
At Lower Risk (61-70) At Lower Risk (61-70)
At Higher Risk (50-60) At Higher Risk (50-60)
Poor (0-49) Poor (0-49)
Source: California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment (2022) C-40 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
Electrification
Electrification is a continuing and growing trend in transportation, particularly in California where statewide policies are in place to facilitate the transition from traditional fossil fuels to alternative fuels.

The advancements made in longer-life batteries, an increase in charging stations, and electric auto technology is making electric vehicles more attractive to consumers and is lowering the "range anxiety" blamed for slow adoption. As the technology develops, prices are becoming more affordable, and consumer choice is beginning to drive the electric vehicle market.

A key element of the growing market for electric vehicles (EV) is infrastructure. In 2021, Fresno COG completed its Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan12 which describes the current need for EV infrastructure and identifies current and future sites of charging stations in Fresno County. According to the EV Readiness Plan, Reedley has a low EV registration rate compared to the State, with an adoption rate of

3.9 per 1,000 vehicles in the County. However, shown in Figure 4-40, the EV registration rate for Reedley has exponentially increased in the past decade with an average growth rate of 59 percent.

While EV adoption in Reedley is increasing, the city only makes up a small percentage of EVs in Fresno County as shown in Figure 4-41.

Figure 4-42 shows existing EV charging infrastructure locations in Reedley. The EV Readiness Plan identified the potential for 62 new EV chargers in Reedley by 2030.

Figure 4-40 Registered Electric Vehicles in Reedley
Number of Registered EVs in Reedley
355
305
255
205
: 155
...°
₴ 105
•O
55 5 ....'
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Year
Source: California Energy Commission
12 Fresno COG EV Readiness Plan (2021)
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-41 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 4-41 Electric Vehicle Registration, Reedley vs. Fresno County Registered EVs Reedley vs. Fresno County
18,500
16,500
14,500
12,500
NUMBER OF EVS 10,500
8,500
6,500
4,500
2,500
500
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
YEAR
• Fresno County • Reedley
Source: California Energy Commission
Figure 4-42 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in Reedley Reedley Colle
Save Mart
enning Ave
Resaley
Reedley DMV
ED
dley Beach
S Frankwood
In As
Source: PlugShare
C-42 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Circulation Existing Conditions and Trends
References
American Community Survey, Table S0801 (5-Year Estimates), 2023, accessed on November 4, 2025.

California Department of Finance, Population and Housing Estimates, 2010-2025, available at:
https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/, accessed on November 4, 2025.

California Energy Commission, Zero Emission Vehicle and Infrastructure Statistics Collection, 2024, available at: https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/zero-emission-vehicle-and- infrastructure-statistics-collection, accessed on November 4, 2025.

California State Association of Counties, Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment, 2022, available at: https://www.counties.org/ongoing-issue/local-streets-and-roads-needs-assessment, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Caltrans, Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), 2024, available at:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/research-innovation-system-information/highway-performance- monitoring-system, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Caltrans, QuickMap, 2025, available at: https://quickmap.dot.ca.gov, accessed on November 4, 2025.

City of Reedley, Active Transportation Parkway Master Plan, 2024.

City of Reedley, Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update, August 2025, available at https://www.fresnolafco.org/files/154527241/FINAL_MSR_Reedley_08-18-25.pdf, accessed on November 4, 2025.

County of Fresno, Geospatial OpenData (Streets GIS Hub), available at: https://city-of-fresno-gis-hub- cityoffresno.hub.arcgis.com/search?q=road&tags=transportation, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno Council of Governments, Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan, January 2021, available at:
https://www.fresnocog.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FCOG-EVRP-2021-1.pdf. accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno Council of Governments, Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2023, available at:
https://www.fresnocog.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2023-ALUCP-Table-of-Contents.pdf. accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno Council of Governments, Fresno County Bikeway Map, 2024, available at:
https://www.fresnocog.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2024-Fresno-Clovis-Bikeways- Map. forprint.pdf, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno Council of Governments, Inteligent Transportation System Strategic Deployment Plan, 2015, available at: https://www.fresnocog.org/project/intelligent-transportation-systems. accessed on November 4, 2025.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | C-43 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Fresno County Department of Public Health, Healthy Fresno County Data Dashboard, 2023-2024, available at: https://www.healthyfresnocountydata.org, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno County Rural Transit Agency, 2026-2030 Short Range Transit Plan, 2025, available at:
https://www.ruraltransit.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SRTP-FCRTA-2026-2030-.pdf, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno County Rural Transit Agency, About Us, 2025, availabe at: https://www.ruraltransit.org/about, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Fresno County Rural Transit Agency, Transit Productivity Evaluation, 2021, 2022, 2024, available at:
https://www.ruraltransit.org/documents, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Measure C, Regional Public Transit, 2024, available at: https://measurec.com/project-type/regional- public-transit, accessed on November 4, 2025.

PlugShare, EV Charging Station Map, 2025, available at: https://www.plugshare.com, accessed on November 4, 2025.

Tulare County Regional Transit Agency, Services & Schedules, 2025, available at:
https://gotcrta.org/services-and-schedules/fixed-route-service, accessed on November 4, 2025.

U.S. Census Bureau, "OnTheMap," 2022, available at: https://onthemap.ces.census.gov, accessed on November 4, 2025.

University of California, Berkeley, Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), 2024, available at:
https://tims.berkeley.edu, accessed on November 4, 2025.

US Census Bureau, LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2022, available at:
https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data, accessed on November 4, 2025.

C-44 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 5 Biological and
Cultural Resources
The City of Reedley and the surrounding region are home to a variety of biological and cultural resources. By understanding the resources present today, the City can plan for sustainable future development that protect species, habitats, and historic and cultural sites unique to Reedley. This chapter provides an overview of the biological and cultural resources in Reedley, including endangered and special status species, sensitive habitats, hydrology, historic sites, and tribal cultural resources.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Threatened, Endangered, and Special Status
Wildlife Species
Special status species are plant and wildlife species that receive special considerations for protections under the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts as well as the California Environmental Quality Act, including species considered at the State and/or Federal level as rare, species of concern or special concern, and endangered or threatened species.

Multiple special-status species are present within the City's Planning Area. Special-status wildlife species include the Fresno kangaroo rat, San Joaquin kit fox, California condor, northwestern pond turtle, California tiger salamander, western spadefoot, monarch butterfly, and vernal pool fairy shrimp.

Special-status plant species that have been known to occur in the Planning Area include San Joaquin adobe sunburst and San Joaquin Valley orcutt grass. Several species that are candidates for potential listing as a protected species are present in the Planning Area, including the burrowing owl and Crotch's bumble bee. These wildlife and plant species occupy habitats that are found within the Planning Area, which include rivers, creeks, agricultural canals, wetlands, ponds, and riparian areas.

San Joaquin Kit Fox Western Spadefoot
Source: California Living Museum Source: USGS
California Condor Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
Source: National Audubon Society Source: USFWS
BIO-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends San Joaquin Valley Orcutt Grass San Joaquin Adobe Sunburst Source: USFWS Source: USFWS
Sensitive Habitats
Although there are no existing or proposed critical habitats for special status species within the City's Planning Area, there are natural areas outside of the urbanized and agricultural portions of the planning area that support habitats for local wildlife and plant species. These habitats are primarily found along the banks of the Kings River in the form of riverine wetlands, freshwater forested/shrub wetlands, and some freshwater emergent wetlands, as shown in Figure 5-1. Some freshwater ponds are also found throughout the Planning Area. The riparian areas along the Kings River are considered Valley Foothill riparian habitat, which are characterized by their winter deciduous trees, understory shrub layer, and groundcover that provide food, water, migration corridors, nesting, and thermal cover for wildlife species.

Reedley Beach, Kings River
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 5-1 National Wetlands Inventory
mE Sumner Aven
Aven
W Parlier Ave
E Cypress Ave
W Manning Ave EMErging Ave
W North Ave E North Ave
Eighth St
E Springfield Ave
WEymann Ave
E Duff Ave
W Dinuba Ave E Dinuba Ave
W Olson Ave E Olson Ave
W Huntsman Ave
«E Floral Aver

0.5 1.5
Miles
City Limits
" LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area

NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
0 0.25 0.5
Lake
• Miles
Last updated: May 18, 2026
BIO-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends Hydrology
Water supply and quality are critical to the sustained health of residents and local flora and fauna. This section describes the existing conditions related to hydrology and water quality in Reedley, as well as efforts to preserve and protect water quality into the City's future.

Reedley is located in the Kings Subbasin of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. The entirety of the Reedley City limits and a majority of the Planning Area covered by the Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA), while some areas west of City limits are covered by the Central Kings GSA. The Kings Subbasin has been identified as critically overdrafted.

Major surface water features in the Planning Area include Kings River, Travers and Wahtoke Creeks, and the Buttonwillow Ditch/Canal. The Kings River flows south along the western portion of the City limits. The river drains from the Sierra Nevada Mountains and is captured in Pine Flat Dam before flowing out to the San Joaquin Valley, eventually reaching Reedley. Before the 1850s, the undammed river created a network of seasonal wetlands throughout the Valley that terminated at Tulare Lake and filled the region's groundwater reserves. Today, the river is used for agriculture irrigation, hydropower generation, and recreation. Travers and Wahtoke Creeks flow southwest, with Travers Creek located to the southeast of the city and Wahtoke Creek located to the northwest of the city. Buttonwillow Ditch/Canal is located in the eastern portion of the Planning Area and snakes through and around agricultural fields and orchards.

Surface and Groundwater Resources
Water Service
The City of Reedley's Department of Public Works Water Division is responsible for all aspects of the City's public water system, including the distribution and management of the City's water supply. As of July 2025, the Water Division provides potable water to approximately 6,440 active service connections for residential, commercial, and industrial uses, as well as landscape/irrigation and fire suppression connections, with an annual average production of 1.59 billion gallons of water for potable use. The Water Division manages the City's groundwater management programs, recycled water program, City contracts, joint power agreements, and master planning of the City's water infrastructure, in addition to Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
performing regular water quality tests and reports, updating infrastructure plans, and overseeing groundwater management consistent with State regulations.

The City's water system consists of over 102 miles of water lines, 7 active groundwater wells with on- site disinfection and remediation facilities, over 6,550 water meters, 865 fire hydrants, 3 water treatment facilities using 14 granulated activated carbon (GAC) filters, and 3 elevated water storage tanks. Of the three storage tanks, two are 50,000-gallon tanks and one is a 1.5 million-gallon tank. The City's water storage tanks provide storage capacity to help meet peak hour demands and continuously pressurize the distribution system depending on water levels in the tanks. The City's groundwater wells have a collective estimated capacity of 11,300 gallons per minute (gpm) from the Kings Subbasin of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. Almost 58 percent of the 102-mile distribution system is composed of asbestos-cement pipe and averages 70 years old, with another 20 percent being polyvinylchloride averaging 50 years old. The remaining pipes in the system consist of steel pipe and cast-iron averaging between 96 and 104 years old, as well as some pipes of unknown material due to their age and a lack of historic records in certain areas The City anticipates an increase in water consumption by a three percent average annual growth rate through 2045. Long-term water level measurements for eight wells near the City obtained from the Department of Water Resources indicate an average annual water level decline of 0.4 feet per year for the Reedley area. Based on groundwater level declines for these wells, an overdraft of approximately 350 acre-feet per year is estimated within the City's LAFCO approved Sphere of Influence. To account for this anticipated growth and address concerns regarding declining groundwater levels and potential groundwater contamination, the City has adopted a water conservation ordinance to reduce overuse of water and is considering infrastructure improvements such as a new groundwater well, water storage tanks, and pipeline improvement projects.

Water Reliability
In September 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) into law to require the sustainable management of groundwater supplies by local agencies.

The City of Reedley lies within the Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA), which aims to facilitate collaboration between local agencies to enact strategies that implement the SGMA in the Kings subbasin. The Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) was adopted in December 2019 and revised in July 2022 to ensure that, by 2040, the basin is managed in a sustainable manner to maintain a reliable water supply for current and future uses, balance water demand with available water supply, and stabilize groundwater levels without negatively impacting groundwater storage, water quality, or land subsidence. The GSP sets out sustainable management criteria, monitoring network, future projects, and implementation measures to achieve the GSA's objectives. As of 2025, the Kings River East GSA is in the process of updating its GSP.

BIO-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends Water Quality
The City of Reedley reported in their 2024 Water Quality Report that the tap water available to residents is safe to drink, based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) standards. Although there is a limited amount of certain contaminants in the water provided by the public water system, the presence and quantity of these contaminants in water does not indicate that water in the City poses a health risk. While one contaminant (1,2,3-TCP MCL) exceeded the allowed maximum level in 2024, this issue was resolved through additional water treatment methods and monthly sampling for monitoring. Additionally, lead contaminants may be present in drinking water, depending on which materials are present in plumbing components. Results of ongoing water quality tests on Reedley's drinking water supply are posted annually in the City's Water Quality Reports.

Historic and Cultural Sites
The establishment of Reedley as an incorporated city began in the 1880s, when Thomas Law Reed moved to what was then known as Smith's Ferry to begin farming wheat. In 1888, he donated land to the Southern Pacific Railroad to connect the community to the greater region. In return, the Railroad determined that the growing town should be named "Reedley." Over the following decades, the community's downtown and surrounding grid was developed; many of the structures built during this time are still standing today. This section describes Reedley's historic, cultural, and tribal resources.

Areas for the Protection of Cultural Resources
As shown in Figure 5-2, there are two historic resources on the National Register of Historic Places: the Reedley National Bank and the Reedley Opera House Complex.

The Reedley National Bank is located at 1100 G Street. The building was built in 1920 and includes prominent architectural details such as brick masonry exterior walls sheathed in ornamental terracotta, steel roof trusses, tall rectangular windows along the frontage, and 23-foot-high ceilings. Ernest J.

Kump, Sr., the architect who designed the bank, was a prominent architect in the central valley during the 1900s; this building is one of his last remaining works. The building was originally a bank, but has housed several commercial businesses since the 1960s, including an optometrist's office and a barbershop.

The Reedley Opera House Complex is a 150-foot-long building located at the southern corner of 10th and G Streets. The complex was built in 1903 and includes the Opera House itself as well as several commercial units. The building was designed and built by a local entrepreneur, Jesse Janson, after a fire destroyed much of downtown Reedley. It remains an example of turn-of-the-century brick commercial architecture in the region.

The Fresno County Historical Landmarks and Records Advisory Commission also maintains its own inventory of historic landmarks within the county, including the following 13 landmarks in Reedley Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
shown in Table 5-1 and Figure 5-2. The Commission advises the Fresno County Board of Supervisors on the preservation and dedication of historic landmarks in the county.

Table 5-1 Inventory of County Historic Landmarks, Reedley Historic Landmark ear Built Address Description
This two-story house was built by Arthur
Back and is designed similar to a Finnish
Back Home 1905 935 J Street Railroad Master's home. The house features a steep pitched roof and U-shaped
gables.
109 South Reed This house was built for Reverend TJJ.

Bauder Home 1889
Avenue Bauder. It is of wood frame construction.

This eight room house was built for the
Besaw Home 1905 857 E Street Besaw family and features Kings River cobble rock for the foundation
Historic marker only. This structure is no
Campbell's Store & 1852 longer present. The ferry was the most 864 Kings River Road
Poole's Ferry important of the Kings River's early
crossings.

This house was built for Daniel T. Eymann
295 South Reed and features a large
J.J. Eymann Home 1903
Avenue wrap-around porch with various types of
windows.

This house was built for August Eymann. It
417 South Reed features a hip roof with five gables and a A.C Eymann Home 1904
Avenue deep porch with curving roof around two
sides.

This structure is no longer present. The
Between I Street and
Peloian Packing House 1904 packing house was operated by the former railway
Peloian Packing Co.
740 W. North This was the first public high school in
Reedley High School 1898
Avenue Reedley and is still in use today.
1919 This bank is also on the National Register
Reedley National Bank 1100G Street
of Historic Places
Southern corner of The opera house is also on the National Reedley Opera House 1903
10th and G Streets Register of Historic Places
Historic marker only. This structure is no
longer present. Smith's ferry was founded
Smith's Ferry & Hotel 1855 Olsen Avenue Bridge by James Smith and disestablished in 1874.

The ferry was useable year-round and the
hotel featured 11 rooms.

Northwest corner of Historic marker only. The farm is no longer Thomas Reed Farm 1886 Manning and Reed present. Land is now a part of the Reedley Avenues College campus.

BIO-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends Historic Landmark Year Built Address Description
This hotel was built by Harry Winnes, a
Old Hotel Winnes/
1913 1726 11th Street prominent business owner at the time. The Burgess Hotel
hotel is still in use today.

Source: Fresno County Historical Landmarks and Records Advisory Commission, 2025; Fresno County Library Figure 5-2 Historic and Cultural Sites
W Partier AVeRARLIER AVE
E Parlier
W Cypress Ave E Cypress Avo
Thomas Reed Farm
N Frankwood
22 PALM AVE
W Manning Ave E Manning Ave
*
Reedley High School
Campbell's Store & Poole's Ferry
W North Ave E North Ave
-Besaw Home
Bauder Home Eighth St Reedley Opera House Complex
Reedley National Bank
J.J. Eymann Home E Springfield Ave
Kings River Rd - Old Hotel Winnes/Burgess Hotel
WEymann Ave
A.C Eymann Home E CARLY AVE
Thirteenth St E Duff Ave UFF AVE
Back Home
VULA ATS E Dinuba Ave
W Dinuba Ave
¡SHER AVE
Smith's Ferry & Hotel
W Olson Ave
E Olson Ave
City Limits W Huntsman Ave
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)

0.5 City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) Miles
GP2030 Study Area
* County Historic Landmark
National Register of Historic Places and
County Historic Landmark
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan

SMITHS FERRY
cantee rainst so senate
300 SOTA TRE PRECH OF BELO

COSSANE FATEST BE THE
.....

FOINT FINITE PENC
J.J. Eymann Home Smith's Ferry Historic Marker
Source: Lorelei Van Sack, 2023 Source: Lester J. Letson, 2009

OFERA HOUSE
Reedley Opera House Complex
Source: Jim Bulls
BIO-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends Tribal Resources
Reedley falls within the traditional tribal territory of the Southern Valley Yokuts. Around 40 to 50 separate tribes, each of which have unique and separate names and languages, are included in the group known today as the "Yokuts," meaning "people." The Yokuts are further broken up by region: Southern Valley, Northern Valley, and Foothill. Throughout history, Yokut tribes lived near water along a 250-mile stretch of the San Joaquin Valley. The banks of the Kings River ranging from east of Sanger to the Reedley area, including parts of Wahtoke Creek, were the territory of the Choinumni, Mono, Wuckchumni, and Tachi subgroups of the Southern Valley Yokuts. The Yokuts are a Federally recognized tribe having ties to the Picayune, Santa Rosa, and Table Mountain rancherias and the Tule River Reservation.

The Reedley Museum has a large collection of historic Yokut artifacts, including the recorded history of the various tribes that lived in the region.

This site is dedicated to honoring the land and the ongoing relationship between Reedley College and the indigenous people of this region.

As a symbol of this relationship, we offer the following land acknowledgement. homeland of the Choirum people. We value their diverse culture and seek to honor the vibro Reedey College gotefully ocknowledges that we work and educate our students on the native communities that at mate ther home here today, It is our hope to ensase, inspire. chalenge and support coch ether for many senerotions to come." Kumay Nim Myce Inyana
Ah Neche Me He Wit
All my tribal people
past, present and future, walk in a good way, honoring all our tribal elders Cholnumni, Wekchumni: Mono, Tachi and Chukchansi - TREEN
Choinumni Monument Dedication Honoring Local Tribes, Reedley College Source: Reedley College, January 2025
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Local and Regional Planning Efforts
Habitat and Conservation Plans
Reedley Community Landscapes Plan: San Joaquin
Green
Reedley Community Landscapes Plan
San Joaquin Green™ The Reedley Community Landscapes Plan consists of a landscapes Presented to the Reedley City Council and Community
assessment, a landscapes palette and conceptual plan, riparian plan, water conservation plan, community education, and an action plan. The TREE
Plan was prepared through the Tree Fresno organization in collaboration with the City of Reedley, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Kaiser Permanente, Johanson Trust, and the Palm Village Retirement

BLE TELEE
Community. Key recommendations from the Plan include tree planting Jobanson

KAISER PERMANENTEN
recommendations, water conservation efforts, targeted removal of invasive species, and other efforts that aim to improve the natural environment in the city.

Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Plan
The Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) was KINGS RIVER ERST adopted in December 2019 and revised in July 2022 to ensure that, by 2040, the basin is managed in a sustainable manner to maintain a reliable water supply for current and future uses, balance water demand with available water supply, and stabilize groundwater levels without negatively impacting groundwater storage, water quality, or land Groundwater Sustainability Plan
Adopted December 13, 2019 subsidence. The GSP sets out sustainable management criteria, monitoring network, future projects, and implementation measures to achieve the GSA's objectives. As of 2025, the Kings River East GSA is in the process of updating its GSP.

BIO-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends Kings River Conservation District Strategic Plan
The Kings River Conservation District (KRCD) Strategic Plan sets out goals and objectives to meet the Districts mission and vision. KRCD acts as a steward of the river to sustainably manage the District's service area water resources, provide flood protection, and enhance the region's public safety and community well-being. The goals included in this Plan KRCD Strategic Plan position KRCD to effectively manage water resources, enhance flood Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026
protection, expand clean energy production, and ensure long-term sustainability for the Kings River region through collaboration and responsible stewardship.

Conservation, Open Space, Parks and Recreation
Chapter Four
Conservation, Open Space, Element (2030 General Plan)
Parks and Recreation Element
The Conservation, Open Space, Parks and Recreation Element of the 2030 General Plan provides for the conservation, development, and use of natural resources, including air, biotic, water, soils, rivers, wildlife, and other natural resources. This Element contains goals and policies to conserve, protect, and maintain natural resources and protect local open space, undeveloped lands, and outdoor recreation areas.

Program Environmental Impact Report (2030 General
FINAL Plan)
The City of Reedley's 2030 General Plan was determined to possibly KEEDLEY GENERAL PLAN 2030
result in significant adverse environmental effects, as defined by the SCH -1010031300
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15064.

This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared to evaluate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may result following the adoption of the General Plan. Additionally, the EIR informs future City determinations regarding the appropriate Tease BE 3038
environmental review process for future specific development projects within the City limits and Sphere of Influence.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Existing Biology Studies
Reedley College Riparian Corridor Vegetation
Assessment
This Assessment covers the riparian corridor along the Kings River at Reedley College, an outstanding example of Central California Riparian Keep Rie Can any
Woodland. The College has managed the area extensively for years; however, several areas along the corridor have great potential for restoration and revegetation of native plants. This segment of river is also host to several undesirable plants requiring removal and control.

The assessment notes observations and recommendations for restoration of this area, including needed resources and maintenance tasks, time and cost estimates, and potential restoration focus areas.

BIO-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Biological and Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Trends References
City of Reedley, Municipal Service Review and Sphere Of Influence Update, August 18, 2025, available at: https://www.fresnolafco.org/files/5400d2c8a/Draft_MSR_Reedley_ 08-18-25.pdf, accessed January 22, 2026.

Database for Indigenous Cultural Evolution (DICE), University of Missouri, Yokuts, available at:
https://dice.missouri.edu/assets/docs/north-america-other/Yokuts.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

Fresno County Historical Landmarks and Records Advisory Commission, 2025 Inventory of Historic Landmarks in Fresno County, 2025, available at: https://www.fresnolandmarks.com/_files/ ugd/d8dfd9_7cbda8db462f40bf8a75c4304a517e11.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

Fresno County Library, Fresno County List of Historic Places, available at: https://www.fresnolibrary.org/ hlrc/historicplaces.pdf, accessed January 21, 2026.

Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Agency, Groundwater Sustainability Plan, July 5, 2022, available at: https://kingsrivereast.org/gspl, accessed January 22, 2026.

Kings River Land Trust, Kings River, 2024, available at: https://kingsriverlandtrust.org/kings-river, accessed January 22, 2026.

National Park Service, National Register of Historic Places Inventory (Reedley Opera House Complex), March 6, 1984, available at: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/123858685, accessed January 21, 2026.

National Park Service, National Register of Historic Places Inventory (Reedley National Bank), February 1, 1985, available at: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/123858685, accessed January 21, 2026.

Reedley College, Choinumni Monument Dedication, February 10, 2025, available at:
https://www.reedleycollege.edu/news/2025/choinumni-monument-dedication.html, accessed January 21, 2026.

Reedley College, Facts & History, available at: https://www.reedleycollege.edu/about/history.html, accessed January 21, 2026.

Reedley College, Land Acknowledgement, 2026, available at: https://www.reedleycollege.edu/about/ Land-acknowledgment.html, accessed January 21, 2026.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, 2026, available at:
https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper, accessed January 22, 2026.

William E. Grenfell Jr., California Department of Fish and Game, California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System: Valley Foothill Riparian, available at: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx? DocumentID=67352, accessed January 22, 2026.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | BIO-15 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
This page is intentionally left blank.

BIO-16 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 5 Public Facilities,
Services, and
Infrastructure
The availability of public facilities, services, and infrastructure of a city are key to a high quality of life, health, and safety of its residents. This chapter provides an overview of the current state of Reedley's infrastructure, public services, parks and recreation facilities, energy and water supply, and other public institutions such as education and healthcare.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Water Supply and Delivery
The Water Division of the City's Public Works Department is responsible for the distribution and management of the city's water supply and infrastructure. Reedley relies on groundwater from 7 active wells and 3 elevated storage tanks (water towers) to serve its 6,440 service connections throughout the city. The seven wells, each of which has on-site disinfection facilities, have an estimated combined flow rate capacity of 11,300 gallons per minute. The North and South Water Towers, located in the downtown area, can each hold up to 50,000 gallons; the Sports Park Water Tower can hold up to 1.5 million gallons. Water is delivered to ratepayers through 102.5 miles of water lines managed and maintained by the Water Division. See Chapter 5 Biological and Cultural Resources for additional information and discussion regarding the City's surface water and groundwater extraction activities.

Between 2019 and 2023 the City pumped an average of 4,910 acre-feet of groundwater each year. The City estimates that, given existing conditions, it can sustainably supply up to 5,579 acre-feet of groundwater through 2030. According to the City's Urban Water Management Plan, the City anticipates a three percent annual increase in water consumption through 2045. The City has started implementing water conservation measures such as adjustments to a water rate plan and watering restrictions to promote sustainable water use citywide. It is anticipated that such conservation measures will need to continue, and possibly increase, to ensure sustained water supply in Reedley. Table 6-1 shows average monthly water use per parcel by user type in 2024.

Table 6-1 2024 Average Monthly Water Use
ser Average Monthly Water Use Per Parce
Single-unit residential 9,803
Multi-unit residential 46,157
Non-residential uses 59,435
PFSI-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Source: Fresno LAFCO Municipal Services Report, Reedley (2025)

REEDLEY
Wastewater Collection and Disposal
The Wastewater Division of the City's Public Works Department is responsible for the collection, conveyance, treatment, and reclamation of wastewater generated in Reedley. The City operates about 78 miles of sewer pipelines, 6 lift stations, and its own wastewater treatment plant located in the southwest portion of the city off East Huntsman Avenue that has a capacity of 5 million gallons per day.

As of October 2025, the Reedley wastewater collection system has an average daily flow of 1.9 million gallons per day and a peak wet weather flow of 2.3 million gallons per day. Treated or reclaimed wastewater is directed to 36 acres of percolation ponds to be recycled back into the groundwater. No recycled water is used A sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) is for irrigation purposes locally or to nearby farmland. the release of untreated or partially A wastewater collection system is considered to be in good treated sewage from a sewer system, indicating something is
condition and adequate capacity if it has no more than 1 to 4 sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) per 100 miles of pipeline wrong with the system. Common causes of SSOs include
annually. Between 2016 and 2024, the City experienced eight SSO incidents, putting it within the acceptable range inappropriate materials entering averaging one incident per year. the system and causing blockages (e.g., non-flushable products),
The City's sewer infrastructure ranges from one to over 100 leaky sewer infrastructure, years old, with records indicating that some portions of the inadequate sewer maintenance, system were installed as early as the 1910s. Continued undersized sewers/pumps, and maintenance and replacement of aging sewer systems will equipment failures. remain one of the City's priorities over the next 10 to 20 years.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Solid Waste and Recycling
Mid Valley Disposal provides solid waste, recycling, and green waste collection services for both residential, commercial, and industrial customers in Reedley. In addition to weekly collection services, Mid Valley Disposal also hosts annual community clean-up events and offers scheduled pick-ups for residents to dispose of items such as
e-waste, old mattresses, tires, and other
bulk household items and prevent illegal

MID VALLEY DISPOSAL
dumping.

The City does not operate a landfill. Once
collected, all solid waste and recycling is
transported to the Tulare County Landfill in
Visalia, and green waste is processed at Mid
Valley Disposal's composting facility in
Kerman, California.

Energy and
Telecommunication
Gas and Electric
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) is the primary electric provider for residents and businesses in Reedley.

PG&E operates a service yard just southeast of Reedley in Dinuba that serves as a regional operational hub for equipment, fleet vehicles, and technicians for service maintenance, repairs, and emergencies.

Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) is the main natural gas provider for residential and commercial service connections in Reedley.

Internet and Telecommunications
Reedley residents and businesses have several options for internet service providers including Xfinity, AT&T, Frontier, Viasat, Verizon, Starlink, and T-Mobile. Services include fiber, satellite, wired, and cable high-speed internet connections with speeds up to two gigabits per second available in some areas of the city. The providers with the widest coverage in Reedley include Xinity (78 percent area coverage), Viasat (100 percent area coverage), Verizon (73 percent area coverage), and Starlink (100 percent area coverage).

Health Care
Adventist Health Reedley is the only acute care hospital in the city, with a 49-bed medical center and 24-hour emergency room. Adventist Health Reedley provides a wide range of medical services PFSI-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends including diabetes care, emergency care, birthing center, primary and specialty care, lab and imaging services, general surgery, women's health, and pediatrics. Adventist Health also operates two medical office locations in Reedley that offer preventative care, family medicine, and health screening services.

United Health Centers operates the in east Reedley. The Health Center provides clinical services, but is not an inpatient hospital. Services provided include internal and family medical care, women's health, dental, optometry, behavioral health, lab and imaging, and urgent care.

Family HealthCare Network operates two locations in Reedley. The facility in central Reedley located off Manning Avenue offers a variety of medical services including family medicine, internal medicine, women's health, and pediatrics. The facility in north Reedley, which opened in November 2025, located off of South Avenue offers family medicine, sports physicals, and dental services.

Schools and Education
Reedley College
Originally founded in 1926, Reedley
College is a community college
Located in north Reedley just east of
the Kings River that provides a variety
College
of higher education and continuing
education programs. Notable
programs include their agriculture
and forestry sciences along with an
on-site 300-acre farm and their flight
sciences program that operates primarily from the Reedley Municipal Airport. Reedley College is a regional asset with an enrollment of over 15,000 students per academic year.

Kings Canyon Unified School District
Reedley's public schools are part of the Kings Canyon Unified School District (KCUSD), which has a total enrollment of about 10,319 students and serves the communities of Reedley, Orange Cove, Dunlap, Miramonte, and Squaw Valley. KCUSD's district offices are also located in Reedley on 10th and H Streets.

Within the City of Reedley, KCUSD operates three elementary schools (Washington Elementary, Lincoln Elementary, and Jefferson Elementary), two K-8 schools (Silas Bartsch School and T.L. Reed School, and one high school (Reedley High School). All elementary and middle school sites offer free after- school programs that operate from end of the school day to 6:00 p.m. and provide enrichment activities, field trips, and educational support.

KCUSD also operates two non-traditional secondary schools in Reedley: Mountain View High School and Reedley Middle College High School. Mountain View High is an independent study school where Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
students complete coursework from their homes under the general supervision of a teacher. Reedley Middle College High is a charter school where high school students attend school on the Reedley College campus and earn a high school diploma and college credit simultaneously.

Kings Canyon Adult School, operated by KCUSD, offers a variety of educational programs for adults such as high school diploma classes, English as a Second Language (ESL) courses, and technical and career courses (e.g., welding, culinary, auto mechanics). ESL and high school diploma classes are offered free of charge.

Private Secondary Education
St. La Salle School (K-8) and Immanuel Schools (K-12) are also located in Reedley and offer private education options and enroll students from Reedley, Fresno, Visalia, Tulare, Hanford, Clovis, and the surrounding communities.

PFSI-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Figure 6-1 Reedley Schools
mE Sumner Aven
TAL. Reed aSSouth Aven
Reedley Elementary School
Locke Ave
College
St. La Salle
W Partier Ave N East Avd
School™ BRailier Ave
Reedley Middle W Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave
College High School Silas Bartsch
Lincoln
Elementary manning Ave School
Reedley
High School
Grant-Middle
School
E Springfield Ave
WEymann Ave Reedley Public Library
Washington
W Dinuba Ave E Dinuba Ave
Elementary School
Immanuel Jefferson Elementary School
WOlsan Ave E Olson Ave
Schools
W Huntsman Ave

1.5 2
Miles
City Limits
LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area
Schools
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Last updated: May 20, 2026
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Public Art
Including artwork in public spaces enhances and beautifies the built environment and creates a vibrant community. In October of 2014 and August of 2015, the City of Reedley initiated a pilot project to introduce artwork into public spaces. Based on the success of the pilot project, in October of 2015, the City Council adopted the Arts in Public Places (APPs) Pilot Program that established an official process in the selection of artwork to be painted. The program seeks to enhance community pride and promote the city's historic heritage and background, while deterring graffiti.

The APP Program funds the painting of utility boxes, irrigation standpipes, and wall murals on both municipal and public properties throughout the city. The Community Development Department is responsible for the coordination and approval of public artwork, with review and approval from the Reedley Planning Commission and City Council.

PFSI-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Government Services
Reedley has a Council-Manager form of government with a five-member City Council. Councilmembers are elected on a nonpartisan basis within their defined district and serve four-year terms. Though the City has a Mayor, the position is not an elected office. Every two years the office of Mayor rotates between Councilmembers in numerical order of Council District. The City Council appoints a City Manager to oversee the daily operations of the City.

The City Council adopts city laws, approves ordinances and resolutions, makes land use decisions, approves the City's budget, hears appeals on decisions made by City staff and commissions, and provides policy direction to the City Manager to carry out operations across the City's various governmental departments, including Administrative Services, Community Development, Community Services, Engineering, Fire, Police, and Public Works.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 6-2 Reedley Public Facilities

E LINDEN AVE

NACACIA AVE

E MYRTLE AVE
Frankwood Ave

N HOLLYWOOD DR N BIRCH AVE
W North Ave W. NORTH AVE E NORE North Avd:
3TH ST
City Hall
and Police Future Civic Fire Station
Department Center
Eighth St S Expansion 10TH ST
Library
12TH ST
NAVE
3TH ST 1TTH ST
Future
Library
Eleventh St want 12TH ST
3TH ST 10TH ST
AW Eymann Ave
14TH ST
Thirteenth St
S Reed Ave ED AVE
13TH ST
11TH ST 15TH ST

0.25 Miles
City Limits
LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SO1)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area

PUBLIC FACILITY
City Hall and Police Department
Library
Fire Station
IIII Future Civic Center Expansion
[I Future Library
Last updated: June 29, 2026
PFSI-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Law Enforcement
The City of Reedley Police Department (RPD) is
responsible for law enforcement within the city and RO
includes three divisions: Administrative, Operations, and Support Services. The Operations Division is the largest team in the Department, responsible for providing 24-hour service and patrol in the city including standard patrol, traffic enforcement, animal control, special events, and a

OF REED
special response team. The Support Services Division is responsible for investigations, crime analysis, dispatch and communications, records, victim services, school resources, evidence and property, and jail facility operations. The Administrative Division provides leadership and support services to the police department through budget
management, recruitment, research and development,
grant management, and media relations and
communications.

As of 2025, the RPD employs 48 full-time personnel including 32 sworn police officers, six dispatchers, one animal control officer, and four specialized community services officers. The RPD owns 51 vehicles (patrol and non-patrol) and operates out of one station that includes training rooms, office space, an armory, a temporary holding facility, and an evidence room. The RPD does not operate a long-term holding facility and transfers detainees to the Fresno County jail or Juvenile Justice Center for booking.

In 2024, the RPD received a total of 23,655 calls for service, 32 percent of which were emergency 911 calls. The average response time in 2024 was 3.5 minutes for Priority 1 calls (highest priority), 4.6 minutes for Priority 2 calls, and 9.7 minutes for Priority 3 calls (lower priority). Between 2022 and 2024, the city experienced a 20 percent decrease in non-violent crimes and violent crimes stayed steady.

Fire Protection
The Reedley Fire Department (RFD) is responsible for providing fire prevention and suppression, search and rescue, water rescue, and emergency medical services to all areas within the City limits as well as some areas in unincorporated Fresno and Tulare Counties, Orange Cove, and Dinuba. The RFD is also responsible for municipal code enforcement.

The RFD is predominantly volunteer based, staffed by one full-time fire chief, a battalion chief, a fire Lieutenant, a staff assistant, , and 36 volunteer firefighters. Volunteer firefighters are compensated on a "paid-per-call" basis.

The RFD has only one station in the city that consists of office space, a dorm area, training facilities, storage, and a four-engine apparatus bay. As of January 2026, the RFD's equipment includes two Type 1 engines, one Type 3 engine, one aerial platform ladder truck, one rescue utility, one tactical tender, Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
one technical rescue vehicle, two rescue boats, and two command vehicles. Volunteers assist in maintaining the station including its grounds and equipment.

REEDLEY FIRE DEPT.:
131
In 2024, the RFD responded to 1,415 calls for service, seven percent of which were fire related calls and 41 percent were medical-related calls. As of 2025, the average response time of the RFD is six to eight minutes, with the goal to maintain a response time of less than 8.5 minutes for emergencies.

As Reedley continues to grow, the RFD is facing increasing infrastructure and staffing constraints. Over the next 20 years, a single fire station may no longer be sufficient to support the pace and spread of new development while maintaining low response times, indicating the need for a second fire station strategically located to align with current and consistent development patterns.

In the past, most of the Department's volunteer firefighters both lived and worked in Reedley. Today, the Department estimates that about 50 percent of their volunteer firefighters commute outside of Reedley for work. This shift, combined with increasing service demand, is making it more difficult to maintain enough trained volunteer firefighters to provide 24-hour service to the community.

Library
The Fresno County Public Library owns and operates the Reedley Branch Library. The library is open Monday through Saturday and offers wireless internet access, laptop checkouts, and printing/copying services. The library also hosts a variety of events for all ages such as knitting groups, children's storytime, crafting events, and talent nights.

PFSI-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends The Library is currently located on
E Street between 10th and 11th
Streets, however, in August 2025
the County broke ground on a new
Reedley Library. The new library
will be located at 1813 11th Street
adjacent to Reedley Rail-Trail. The

REEDLEY LIBRARY
new building will be about 14,000 COUNTY OF FRESNO
square feet (almost triple the size
of the existing library) and will
feature a dedicated children's area,
a multi-use community room and
kitchenette, and study rooms for
students and small groups.

Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
Reedley has several parks, open space areas, and recreational facilities that provide residents and visitors opportunities to build community, access natural habitats, and be physically active. The conservation and maintenance of these spaces is important to the physical, emotional, and mental health of residents.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 6-3 Reedley Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Facilities alE Sumner Ave!
Citizens Par
W Parlier Ave
W Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave
N Reco
* Camacho Park
W Manning Ave Jing Aver
Pioneer
Park W Norh Ave E North Ave
Community Centerand Mueller Park
"E Springfield Ave
WEymann Ave
Trimble Park E Duff Ave
and Splash Pad Reedley
Reedley Beach W Dinuba Ave Parkway E Dinuba Ave
Smith's Reedley
Ferry Park Sports Park
E Olson Ave
Cricket
* Hollow Park

0.5 1.5
Miles
City Limits
LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area
Parks

0.25 0.5
| Miles
Last updated: July 6, 2026
PFSI-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Parks
Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are smaller parks (less than one acre meant to serve the surrounding residential neighborhood as an open green space and typically have limited facilities beyond landscaping. Reedley has five neighborhood parks totaling about two acres: East Carob Park, East Myrtle Park, Carpenter/Cyrier Park, Columbia Park, and East Carpenter Park. Both East Carob Park and Columbia Park include a small basketball court, the other three offer only grassy areas.

Community Parks
Community parks are larger parks (up to 15 acres in size) that offer a variety of recreational opportunities and facilities meant to serve all community residents. Reedley has four community parks totaling about 29 acres:
• Camacho Park includes three lighted baseball/softball diamonds that can be rented out for tournaments and other sporting events. The park also includes restrooms, bleachers, and a snack bar.
• Citizen's Park, located in the northern portion of the city, is a large multi-use park that includes a large field frequently used for soccer and flag football games, a half-mile lighted walking trail, exercise stations, shade trees, a shaded ADA accessible play structure, picnic tables, restrooms, basketball courts, and a snack bar used for recreational sporting events. • C.F. Mueller Park is a multi-use park located next to the Reedley Community Center with large grassy areas, shade trees, picnic tables, barbecues, a lighted walking trail, a covered pavilion, and restrooms. The park also includes two shaded playgrounds, basketball courts, a skate park, and a fully fenced dog park that has separate areas for large dogs and small dogs.

Pioneer Park is located directly across the street from City Hall and includes large grassy areas, shade trees, a large, covered pavilion, a gazebo, picnic tables, and restrooms. Pioneer Park is also the location of the Reedley Community Bandshell where community concerts are held throughout the year.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-15 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan

INLEY COMMENT BASSIE
Pioneer Park Reedley Sports Park
C.F. Mueller Park
PFSI-16 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Specialized Recreation Areas
Specialized recreation area parks are community parks that have special characteristics or facilities that are distinctive from standard park facilities and may draw visitors from outside the city. Reedley has four specialized recreation area parks, totaling about 41 acres:
• Cricket Hollow Park is located on the west bank of the Kings River and includes a grassy area, picnic tables, barbeques, and restrooms.
• Smith's Ferry Park is located on the east bank of the Kings River and includes a grassy area, picnic tables, barbeques, and a portable toilet.
• Luke Trimble Park is a unique park featuring a splash pad that operates in the summer months (Memorial Day through Labor Day). In addition to the splash pad, the park also includes shaded picnic tables, a small play structure, grassy areas, and restrooms which are open year-round.

Reedley Sports Park is an 13.8-acre sports facility is southeast Reedley that includes large lighted turf fields that can be used for soccer, football, and baseball/softball, as well as a NCAA soccer field that has two youth field overlays. The park also includes picnic tables, barbecues, a lighted paved walking path, a shaded pavilion, a shaded playground, parking, and a restroom and concessions building. The existing park includes the first two completed phases of a multi- phase park development that is further described below.

Reedley Sports Park Master Plan
The Reedley Sports Park is a multi-phase
recreational facility project in southeast
Reedley that is envisioned as a state-of- REEDLEY
the-art regional recreational complex for
local and regional use. Once completed.
the 50-acre complex will include sports
fields/courts, spectator seating, open
green space, playgrounds, trails, large
picnic areas, and ample parking to
accommodate larger sporting events and
tournaments. The Reedley Sports Park
Master Plan, adopted February 2016,
outlines the phased development of the
complex, with phase one completed in
2009 and phase two completed in 2025.

Phases three through seven include the
following key improvements:
• Two youth soccer fields (with one baseball field overlay) • Four outdoor basketball courts
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-17 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
• Four softball/baseball fields (with two soccer field overlays) • Three tennis courts
• Seven outdoor volleyball courts
• Dog park
• Splash park and large playground
• Five small group picnic areas
• Two large group picnic areas
• Restrooms and concessions
• Creek restoration and pedestrian trail along Traver Creek In 2023, the site plan for the Mixed Sports Phase was revised to include pickleball courts, and two pickleball courts were constructed in 2026.

Community & Recreation Facilities
Reedley High School Aquatics
Complex. Reedley High School's
Aquatic Complex is a 50-meter
Olympic-sized swimming pool
that is open to the public on
select days and times for lap
swim as well as swim classes
and water aerobics. The complex
features eight swim lanes,
canopied bleachers, a warmup
pool, locker rooms, a classroom,
and a snack bar.

Reedley Community Center. The Reedley Community Center offers a variety of recreational, social, and educational events and programs throughout the year such as adult and youth sport leagues, paint nights, dance classes, early enrichment classes, youth camps, and first aid/CPR courses. The community center has a large community room (about 6,000 square feet) available for rent that can accommodate up to 600 people for large meetings or events and is equipped with a stage, and kitchen. The community center also has several smaller conference rooms (640-1,500 square feet) and outdoor patio spaces available for smaller community meetings and gatherings.

Reedley Senior Center. The Reedley Senior Center is managed by the City's Community Services Department and coordinates a variety of programs and social gatherings for Reedley's senior citizens such as game nights, craft and cooking classes, outings, and exercise classes. The Center also serves PFSI-18 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Existing Conditions and Trends Lunch Monday through Friday and a grocery drive-thru program every Wednesday, both hosted at the Reedley Community Center.

Open Space
Reedley Community Parkway (Rail-Trail). The Reedley Community Parkway (also known as the Rail- Trail) is a 3.2-mile multi-use trail that stretches from Reedley College to Reedley Sports Park. The trail offers residents a safe route for active transportation modes such as biking, walking, and running. The trail includes lighting, benches, and landscaping.

Kings River/Reedley Beach. The Kings River is a vital natural resource that offers residents and visitors both access to natural open spaces and a variety of water sports such as boating, kayaking, and swimming. Reedley Beach is an 18-acre publicly accessible beach located on the Kings River just north of Olson Bridge. The beach offers easy access to the river as well as shade trees and restrooms.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | PFSI-19 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
References
City of Reedley Police Department, 2024 Annual Report - Police Services, 2025 https://reedley.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/FINAL_FINAL DRAFT - _2024 SERVICES_ REPORT-1750879046.pdf
Fresno LAFCO, 2025 Municipal Service Review and SOl Update, 2025 https://www.fresnolafco.org/files/154527241/FINAL_MSR_Reedley 08-18-25.pdf Reedley Chamber of Commerce, Discover Reedley-Community Guide and Business Directory, 2025 https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/79d0c787-40d4-43f3-afb4- 4cec6537052e/Discover%20Reedley%202025.pdf
City of Reedley website, multiple pages. https://reedley.ca.gov/ Broadband Now, Internet Providers in Reedley, CA, https://broadbandnow.com/California/Reedley Fresno County Public Library, Fresno County Public Library To Break Ground On New Reedley Library https://www.fresnolibrary.org/press/releases/2025/8.27%20Fresno%20County%20Public%20Library % 20to%20Break%20Ground%20on%20New%20Reedley%20Library.pdf City of Reedley, Reedley Sports Park Master Plan, 2016. https://reedley.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/reedleyweb/2022/02/2016-02-

10.2015 Reedley Sports Park_MP_Revision_Report-Final-1643763312.pdf Kings Canyon Unified School District Website, multiple pages. https://www.kcusd.com/ PFSI-20 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026

REEDLEY
7 Air Quality
Air quality refers to the condition of the air in our environment and is determined by the presence and concentration of pollutants in the air. Air pollution can come from a variety of sources such as transportation, agriculture, dust, fires, and industrial operations. Poor air quality can negatively impact the health of humans, animals, and plants and cause chronic health issues such as asthma and other respiratory diseases.

This chapter provides an overview of Reedley's air quality conditions including emission sources, ambient air quality concerns, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the identification of sensitive receptors.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | AQ-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Regulatory Setting
Federal, State, and Local Laws and Regulations
The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish and periodically revise national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six criteria air pollutants, as well as target dates and nonattainment requirements for states.

The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires California Air Resources Board (CARB) to establish ambient air quality standards for California (CAAQS) for the same six pollutants as the NAAQS. Unlike Federal standards, the CAAQS do not have target dates for attainment.

The Reedley General Plan includes an analysis of air quality along with associated goals, policies, and programs to address air quality at the local level, as required by Section 65302.1 of the California Government Code for all jurisdictions within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin.

The Reedley Climate Action Plan provides a focused framework for how the City will reduce air pollution and address the causes and impacts of climate change at the local level. The CAP establishes short-term, action-oriented policies and programs that include measurable emissions targets, timelines, and monitoring frameworks.

Implementing Agencies
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
The USEPA is responsible for administering the CAA and establishing the NAAQS and oversees state monitoring efforts and enforcement to meet and maintain NAAQS.

California Air Resources Board (CARB)
CARB is responsible for establishing the CAAQS under the CCAA as well as preparing and enforcing plans in an effort to achieve NAAQS and CAAQS. Additionally, CARB monitors statewide air quality though a network of monitoring stations and regulates emissions from vehicles and consumer products.

CARB is also responsible for assigning attainment and nonattainment designations to air quality control districts based on Federal and State standards.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) The SJVAPCD is responsible for reducing air pollution from sources other than vehicles and consumer products within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. The District establishes rules and regulations to monitor and reduce criteria pollutants to meet State and Federal standards.

AQ-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Air Quality Existing Conditions and Trends
Existing Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are locations with people who may have an increased sensitivity or exposure to air pollutants due to age, health, proximity to emission sources, or duration of exposure to pollutants.

Sensitive receptors typically include schools, hospitals, and senior living facilities due to the presence of children, elderly adults, and people with health conditions. Residential or recreational areas near an emission source or polluting land use can also be considered sensitive receptors due to prolonged exposure to poor air quality in these areas.

Sensitive receptors in Reedley include schools, childcare facilities, hospitals, and senior care facilities throughout the city. Figure 7-1 identifies the location and type of existing sensitive receptors in Reedley.

Air Pollution Characteristics and Sources
Criteria Air Pollutants
Air pollution is when harmful particles or molecules are introduced to the atmosphere that can be inhaled or absorbed by humans, animals, and plants. The Federal Clean Air Act identifies six common air pollutants that are referred to as "criteria air pollutants". These six pollutants are monitored and analyzed to determine air quality in our communities.

Ozone, ground-level (03)
Ground level ozone (O3) is a harmful air pollutant and the primary component of smog, posing risks to both human health and the environment. Unlike many pollutants, ozone is not emitted directly but forms when nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds from vehicles, power plants, and industrial sources react in the presence of sunlight. Ozone concentrations are often highest on hot, sunny days in urban areas, but elevated levels can also occur in rural areas due to long distance transport by wind Breathing ozone can aggravate respiratory conditions such as asthma, while prolonged exposure can damage sensitive vegetation and ecosystems, particularly during the growing season.

Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10)
Particulate matter (PM) is a mixture of tiny solid particles and liquid droplets suspended in the air, ranging from visible dust and soot to microscopic particles detectable only with specialized equipment.

PM is commonly categorized as PM10, which includes inhalable particles 10 micrometers or smaller, and PM2.5, which are fine particles 2.5 micrometers or smaller and pose the greatest health risk. These particles are emitted directly from sources such as construction sites, unpaved roads, fires, and smokestacks, or they form in the atmosphere through chemical reactions involving pollutants like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from vehicles and industrial sources. Because PM can penetrate deep into the lungs and, in the case of PM2.5, enter the bloodstream, exposure is linked to serious health effects and respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Fine particles are also a major cause of reduced visibility, creating haze that affects scenic and natural areas.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | AQ-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 7-1 Sensitive Receptors
•E Sumner Aver
W-Cypress Avi E Cypress Ave
E North Ave
E Springfield Ave
WEymann Ave
S East Ave
Bird Ave E Dinuba Ave
E Olson Ave
W Huntsman Ave

1.5 2
Miles
City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area

SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
Childcare Facility
Senior Living/Care
Hospital
Schools 0 0.25 0.5
] Miles
Parks
Last updated: May 20, 2026
AQ-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Air Quality Existing Conditions and Trends
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas produced by the incomplete burning of fuels, with the largest outdoor sources coming from cars, trucks, and other fossil fuel-powered vehicles and equipment. CO can also be released indoors from sources such as unvented heaters, furnaces, gas stoves, and leaking chimneys, where it can accumulate to dangerous levels. When inhaled, CO reduces the blood's ability to carry oxygen to vital organs such as the heart and brain. High indoor concentrations can cause dizziness, confusion, unconsciousness, and even death. While very high levels are unlikely outdoors, elevated outdoor CO can pose health risks for people with heart disease, particularly during physical exertion, potentially triggering chest pain (angina).

Sulfur Dioxide (S02)
Sulfur dioxide, (S02), is a gaseous air pollutant and the primary indicator used to regulate the broader group of sulfur oxides because it occurs at much higher concentrations than other SOx compounds. The largest sources of SO, emissions are fossil fuel combustion at power plants and industrial facilities, with smaller contributions from industrial processes, high sulfur fuel use in ships and locomotives. Reducing SOz emissions also lowers the formation of other sulfur oxides and fine sulfate particles, which are a major component of particulate matter pollution. Short term exposure to SO can impair breathing and aggravate respiratory conditions, especially asthma in children. Environmentally, SO2 contributes to acid rain, damages vegetation, reduces visibility through haze, and can stain or degrade buildings, monuments, and other materials.

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Nitrogen dioxide (NOz) is a highly reactive gas and a key indicator used to represent the broader group of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in air quality regulation. NO2 primarily enters the atmosphere through fuel combustion, with major sources including motor vehicles, power plants, and manufacturing equipment.

Short term exposure to elevated NO2 levels can irritate the respiratory system and worsen conditions such as asthma, while long term exposure may contribute to the development of asthma and increase susceptibility to respiratory infections, particularly among children, the elderly, and individuals with existing respiratory disease. NOz also reacts in the atmosphere to form particulate matter and ozone, both of which pose additional respiratory health risks. Environmentally, NO2 contributes to acid rain, reduced visibility from haze, and nutrient pollution that can harm sensitive aquatic ecosystems.

Lead (Pb)
Lead is a toxic metal that enters the air primarily from metals processing and aircraft that use leaded aviation fuel, with additional sources including waste incinerators, utility facilities, and some industrial processing and manufacturing. Airborne lead concentrations are typically highest near smelting and industrial facilities, although national levels have declined dramatically following regulatory actions, including the removal of lead from motor vehicle gasoline. Once inhaled or ingested, lead accumulates in the blood and bones and can harm multiple body systems, with the most significant current risk being Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | AQ-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
neurological effects in children. Infants and young children are especially vulnerable, as lead exposure can contribute to learning disabilities, behavioral problems, and reduced IQ. In the environment, lead persists in soils and sediments and can impair plant and animal growth, reproduction, and neurological function.

Sources
Air pollution comes from a variety of emission sources from stationary industrial uses to vehicle traffic to consumer products such as paints and aerosol sprays. Emission sources are categorized into four types: point, areawide, mobile, and natural sources.

Point sources are stationery and can include uses such as gas stations, refineries, dry cleaners, or industrial plants. Point sources are monitored and regulated by SJVAPCD and require a permit from the District. As of 2023, there are 48 point sources for criteria pollutants in Reedley and consist primarily of gas stations, industrial agriculture facilities, trucking companies, food processing and packing facilities, and manufacturing companies.

Areawide sources are monitored and regulated by CARB and include mostly consumer products that may not individually emit significant sources of air pollution, but when aggregated across a regional area can impact air quality. Areawide sources in Reedley include the use of certain paints and varnishes, fuel combustion, and heating systems (residential and commercial), Mobile sources include emissions from vehicles and other transportation modes and are monitored and regulated by CARB. Reedley is not located along a major highway, which reduces exposure to large quantities of vehicle pollutants. However, Reedley is still affected by mobile sources of pollution along major roadways such as Manning Avenue, agricultural trucking operations related to agricultural production, railroads, and aviation activities at the Reedley airport.

Natural sources include air pollution such as windblown dust and wildfires. These emission sources are also regulated by CARB, in addition to manmade air pollution sources.

Existing Air Quality
To monitor air quality levels, CARB and SJVAPCD collect data on the criteria air pollutants using strategically placed air monitoring stations. Table 7-1 shows a three-year summary of air pollutant data collected from three monitoring stations closest to Reedley. The Parlier station collects data on ozone, the Fresno-Hamilton and Winery station collects data on particulate matter 2.5 (PM25), and the Fresno- Drummond Street station collects data on particulate matter 10 (PM10).

Between 2022 and 2024, emissions in the Reedley area show several violations of the State and/or Federal standard for all pollutants, with the one-hour ozone concentration and PM10 being the most severe.

AQ-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Air Quality Existing Conditions and Trends
Table 7-1 Annual Air Quality Data in the Reedley Area
Pollutan 2022 2023 2024
Ozone (ppm) - 8-hour average
8-hour maximum average 0.088 ppm 0.087 ppm 0.093 ppm
Number of days over State standard 30 days 35 days 53 days Ozone (ppm) - 1-hour observations
1-hour maximum 0.112 ppm 0.099 ppm 0.121 ppm
Number of days over State standard 4 days 4 days 13 days Particulate Matter <2.5 microns (ug/m3)
24-hour maximum average 55.8 Hg/m3 47.4 ug/m3 62.5 ug/m3 Number of days over Federal standard 18 days 11 days 9 days Particulate Matter <10 microns (ug/m3)
24-hour maximum average 166.5 ug/m3 130 ug/m3 151.3 ug/m3 Number of days over State standard 115.6 days
ppm = parts per million
ug/m3 = Micrograms per cubic meter
(-) = Insufficient data available to determine
Source: CARB ADAM Air Quality Statistics (2026)
Attainment Designations
Air pollution control districts that do not meet the State and/or Federal standards for criteria pollutants are required to adopt air quality attainment plans. These plans show how the how the region will attain air pollutant standards by a certain date.

Table 8-2 shows the current attainment status of each criteria pollutant for the San Joaquin Valley as well as the State and Federal standards for each pollutant. SJVAPCD has an air quality attainment plan for particulate matter (last updated in 2024) and ozone (last updated in 2022).

Table 7-2 Current Ambient Air Quality Attainment Status for the San Joaquin Valley Criteria Pollutant Federal Standard State Standard Attainment Status Ozone (1 hour) None 0.09 ppm Nonattainment/Severe
Ozone (8-hour) 0.07 ppm 0.07 ppm Nonattainment
Particulate Matter 2.5 9 4g/m3 12 ug/m3 Nonattainment
Particulate Matter 10 150 ug/m3 50 ug/m3 Nonattainment
Carbon Monoxide 9 ppm 9 ppm Attainment
Lead 0.15 ug/m3 1.5 ug/m3 Attainment
Sulfur Dioxide 0.14 ppm 0.04 ppm Attainment
Nitrogen Dioxide 0.053 ppm 0.030 ppm Attainment
Source: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (2026) Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | AQ-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
References
California Air Resources Board, Facility Search Tool, Reedley, available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/applications/facility-search-tool, accessed January 2026.

California Air Resources Board, iADAM Air Quality Statistics, Trends Summary, available at https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/trends/trends1.php, accessed January 2026.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status, available at: https://www.valleyair.org/air-quality-information/ambient-air-quality-standards-valley- attainmnet-status, accessed January 2026.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide (CO) Pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/co-pollution, accessed February 2, 2026.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ground-Level Ozone Pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution, accessed February 2, 2026.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Lead Air Pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/lead-air-pollution, accessed February 2, 2026.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Nitrogen Dioxide (NOz) Pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/no2-pollution, accessed February 2, 2026.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Particulate Matter (PM) Pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution, accessed February 2, 2026.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sulfur Dioxide (SOz) Pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/so2-pollution, accessed February 2, 2026.

AQ-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 REEDLEY FIRE DÉPT.

REEDLEY TRUCK
131
8 Safety and Hazards
Natural and manmade hazards are an important concern for communities due to their potential impacts to residents, businesses, and critical infrastructure. Disruptions to essential services and public safety can cause long-lasting social, economic, health, and environmental implications for the local community.

This chapter covers potential safety threats and hazards resulting from earthquakes, flooding, wildfires, droughts, hazardous materials, and climate change, as well as regional planning efforts to improve emergency preparedness.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Geological Environment and Hazards
Seismic Hazard Zones
Reedley does not have any active faults within the City limits but could be subject to seismic shaking from regional faultlines. As shown in Figure 8-1, the nearest active fault is the Kern Canyon fault, located approximately 55 miles east of the city through the mountainous area of southern Sierra Nevada.

Additionally, the Nunez and San Andreas faults are located approximately 61 and 72 miles west of the city, respectively. These faults and fault systems have the potential to produce high magnitude earthquakes throughout Fresno County.

In the last 10 years, an annual average of 30 earthquakes of a magnitude 4.0 or greater occurred within 186 miles of the County. Additionally, the California Geological Survey identified at least four magnitude 5.0 or greater earthquakes that caused damaging shaking in Fresno County between 1800 and 1999. According to the 2024 Fresno County Hazard Mitigation Plan, the likelihood of future occurrences of earthquakes is highly likely.

The Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale, used by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and California Geological Survey (CGS), classifies earthquake intensity based on the severity of ground shaking.

Intensity levels reflect the extent of potential damage to buildings, infrastructure, and the natural environment, as well as how strongly the shaking is perceived by people. The scale and scope of actual damage caused from an earthquake is dependent on the distance and intensity of the earthquake, the buildings and infrastructure involved, and the landscape characteristics. The Planning Area ranks a 7.6 on the MMI scale, which equates to an average frequency of 10 to 20 seismic events per year and is associated with a higher possibility of damage to buildings.

Soil Strength Properties
During periods with strong ground shaking and earthquakes, areas with loosely packed, water-logged sediments at or near the ground surface lose their strength and become unstable in a process known as liquefaction. Loose, granular soils, which are less stable than bedrock, and are more prone to liquefaction. During earthquakes, liquefaction can cause major damage to buildings and other structures. Although Reedley is not located within an identified liquefaction hazard area in the California Geological Survey, future liquefaction could occur if unconsolidated sediments and a high-water table coincide in a particular area.

SAF-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Safety & Hazards Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 8-1 Regional Fault Activity
City Limits
GP2030 Study Area

FAULT CLASSIFICATION
- Historic Fault Displacement (past 200
Holocene Fault Displacement (past
« 11,700 years)
Late Quaternary Fault Displacement
(past 700,000 years)
me Quaternary Fault (age undifferentiated)
.._ Pre-Quaternary Fault (older than 1.6
million years)

CALIFOR
20 Miles
Last updated: February 10. 2026
Source: California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey, 2026 Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Flooding
Major Rivers, Creeks, and Drainages
Major waterways in the city and surrounding area include Kings River, Travers and Wahtoke Creeks, and the Buttonwillow Ditch/Canal. The Kings River runs along the western portion of the City limits and flows south from Pine Flat Dam, located approximately 30 miles upriver from Reedley. The Dam's primary functions include flood control, irrigation water, hydroelectric power generation, and recreation in Pine Flat Lake. Wahtoke and Travers Creeks are both located within the Sphere of Influence to the north and east of the of the City limits, respectively. Buttonwillow Ditch/Canal is located in the eastern portion of the Planning Area and provides drainage control. There are also numerous additional unnamed drainage ditches found within the Planning Area, primarily within agricultural areas.

Flooding at Reedley Beach
Source: KMPH
FEMA Floodplain Mapping
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) produces Flood Insurance Rate Maps identifying areas of increased flood risk, including 100- and 500-year floodplains. Areas within 100-year floodplains have a 1 percent chance each year of flooding in any given year, while areas in 500-year floodplains have a 0.2 percent chance each year of flooding in any given year.

Reedley is at risk from flooding from several watersheds throughout the area. Wahtoke Creek to the north of the City limits, Travers Creek to the east of the City limits, and the Kings River along the western edge of the City limits have the potential to affect flooding events in the western portion of the city as well as areas surrounding the City limits in 100-year flood scenarios, as seen in Figure 8-2. Additionally, the Kings River has the potential to affect the western portion of the city under 500-year flood scenarios.

SAF-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Safety & Hazards Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 8-2 FEMA Flood Zones
5 Kings Riv
W Partier Ave
od Avi
E Cypress Ave
W Manning Ave Earshning Ave
W North Ave E North Ave
E Sprinafield Ave
WEymann Ave
E Duff Ave
W Dinuba Ave E Dinuba Ave
WOlson Ave E Olson Ave
W Huntsman Ave

0.5 1.5
Miles
City Limits
*_ LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOl)
* City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area

FEMA NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD LAYER
500-year Flood Zone
100-year Flood Zone
2 Regulatory Floodway

0.25 0.5
- Miles
Last updated: May 12, 2026
Source: FEMA, 2024.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Safety and Development Constraints
Properties that are located within a FEMA-designated special flood hazard area (SHA) are subject to National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as well as State and local regulations that aim to reduce the potential for flood damage in future development. If properties wish to develop within a SHA zone, the applicant must follow special permitting procedures, development regulations, and insurance requirements. In Reedley, applicants need to consider if their property is located within an SHA and/or one of the City's Flood Hazard Overlay Zone Districts: Floodway Overlay Zone District (-FW) or Flood Fringe Overlay Zone District (-FF). New development within an SHA or either of these overlay zone districts is required to be elevated and floodproofed, may not divert or increase flooding hazards, and must comply with all other applicable development and Building Code standards and flood insurance requirements.

In the event of a major release or dam failure from Pine Flat Dam, downstream flooding would occur over agricultural lands near riverbanks and possibly within the City of Reedley. However, the City of Reedley is not identified in the 2024 Fresno County Hazard Mitigation Plan as an area at high risk for flooding in the event of a dam failure. Climate change may increase the extent and frequency of flooding in Reedley and the greater region due to increases in precipitation; storm water systems, creeks, rivers, and the Pine Flat Dam have the potential to be overwhelmed from extreme precipitation events, which could result in damages to structures and costly repairs for property owners.

Fire Risks
While large wildfires are not common in Reedley, the
surrounding rural areas are at risk of fire hazards,
particularly during hot, dry summers. The City mitigates this risk through annual weed abatement and fuel
removal, updated fire codes, and community education.

This section covers urban and wildland fire risks in the Planning Area and the City's fire protection resources.

Urban and Wildland Fire Risks
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) is required to identify fire hazard severity statewide. Based on factors such as fuel, terrain, and
weather, CAL FIRE identifies Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs) and determines an area's level of service rating within State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local
Responsibility Areas (LRAs). As shown in Figure 8-3, the entirety of the City limits, Sphere of Influence, and House Fire in Reedley Source: CBS47 and KSEE24
Planning Area are located within an LRA with no FHSZ
SAF-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Safety & Hazards Existing Conditions and Trends
present. However, a moderate FHSZ located within an SRA is located approximately one mile to the northeast of Reedley Municipal Airport, outside of the Planning Area. Moderate FHSZs are areas that have been identified as having a moderate risk of wildfire based on factors such as vegetation, terrain, and weather patterns.

According to CAL FIRE, the greatest potential for significant damage to life and property from fire exists in areas designated as Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) areas. A WUl area defines the condition where highly flammable vegetation is adjacent to developed areas. A significant portion of the area surrounding the city is used for agricultural purposes. As such, there are no WUl areas in Reedley, as designated by CAL FIRE.

Fire Hazard Risk Areas
Unimproved lands, overgrown weeds, and other dry vegetation within and surrounding the city have the potential to worsen fire hazards. Particularly during hot, dry months, these fuels can pose a fire risk if ignited. Urbanized, built out areas, such as the downtown grid and other neighborhoods with little to no vacant parcels, generally have lower potential fire risk compared to areas surrounding the City limits.

Code Enforcement conducts an annual proactive weed abatement program and monitors properties with tall weeds and grasses with the potential to lead to fire hazards, particularly for vacant lots within City limits.

Fire Protection Resources
The Reedley Fire Department (RFD) is responsible for providing fire prevention and suppression, search and rescue, water rescue, and emergency medical services to all areas within the City limits as well as some areas in unincorporated Fresno and Tulare Counties, Orange Cove, and Dinuba. The RFD is predominantly volunteer based and is staffed by a fire chief, a battalion chief, a fire lieutenant, a staff assistant, and 36 volunteer firefighters who operate out of the City fire station at 1060 D Street near downtown Reedley. As of January 2026, the RFD's equipment includes two Type 1 engines, one Type 3 engine, one aerial platform ladder truck, one rescue utility, one tactical tender, one technical rescue vehicle, two rescue boats, and two command vehicles. Volunteers assist in maintaining the station, including its grounds and equipment.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 8-3 Fire Hazard Severity Zones
e South Ave
rlier Ave E Parlier:Ave
Eleventh St Thirteenth St
E Duff Ave
E Dinuba Ave
WOlson Ave
E/Floral Aven
City Limits FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA 5J LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREA Moderate I J City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) Moderate High High Very High
GP2030 Study Area
Very High Non-Wildland
3 6
Miles
Last updated: May 12, 2026
Source: CAL FIRE, 2025.

SAF-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Safety & Hazards Existing Conditions and Trends
Hazardous Materials
Due to the freight rail that regularly passes through the center of the city, there is a risk of transportation-related accidents adjacent to the railway, including potential damages caused by freight rail accidents. A release of hazardous materials due to a rail accident could expose the residents of Reedley to health and safety hazards, particularly for those who live adjacent to the railway.

Additionally, the City has designated Reed Avenue, Manning Avenue, I Street, a portion of G Street, a portion of 11* Street, a portion of 13t Street, a portion of G Street, Buttonwillow Avenue, a portion of Dinuba Avenue, and a portion of West Olsen Avenue as designated local truck routes; any releases of hazardous materials along these routes could similarly risk the health and safety of residents. Figure 8- 4 shows the location of the railway, all locally-designated truck routes, and routes where trucks are prohibited in the city.

In addition to roadway and rail risks, residents may also face potential exposure from the oil, fuel, and natural gas pipelines located throughout the city. The use of hazardous materials in agricultural and residential settings could also carry the potential for environmental release if used improperly, posing a risk to the health and safety of the community.

If residents have household hazardous waste (HHW) they need to dispose of, the County of Fresno operates an HHW facility at 1327 West Dan Ronquillo Drive in Fresno where County residents can drop off HHW at no cost. Businesses may also dispose of hazardous waste at the facility by appointment.

County of Fresno Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facility Source: County of Fresno
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 8-4 Truck and Rail Routes
Th wumnar nue
W Parlier Ave
w Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave
We AVE
E North Ave
E Springfield Ave
E Duff Ave
E Olson Ave
0 0.5 1.5
• Miles
• City Limits
LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOl)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
• GP2030 Study Area

ROUTE CLASS
- Truck Route
- - Trucks Prohibited
| Railroad Tracks

0.25 0.5
] Miles
Last updated: July 6, 2026
Source: City of Reedley, 2026.

SAF-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Safety & Hazards Existing Conditions and Trends
Climate Change
The continued release of greenhouse gases, primarily from fossil fuel combustion, has worsened climate change and the frequency and intensity of its combined impacts. In recent years, the State has swung between extremes: from the worst drought in its recorded history between 2012 and 2016, to the wettest season on record from 2016 to 2017, back to one of the most severe droughts on record in 2021, and then to unusually high rainfall in 2023. These dramatic shifts reflect a growing pattern of climate instability. This section includes a discussion of how climate change and its many associated hazards may impact Reedley residents:
• Higher temperature. Annual average temperatures in the region are projected to rise at an accelerated pace, contributing to broader climate instability. It is estimated that, by 2050, average temperatures in January will increase by three to four degrees and average temperatures in July will increase by five to six degrees.

Extreme heat. The number of extreme heat days will increase as temperatures climb, with more days exceeding the threshold of 90 degrees for at least two to three days. Consecutive weeks of extreme heat increase evapotranspiration and reduce moisture content in vegetation, leading to higher wildfire vulnerability during that time period. Additionally, extreme heat can pose a significant threat to human health, particularly for younger and older individuals, pregnant persons, and other with medical conditions and disabilities.

Longer and more severe droughts. California has already experienced some of its most severe droughts in the past decade, and projections suggest this trend will continue, with longer and more intense drought periods expected throughout the century. • Declining snowpack. Snowpack in the eastern elevated regions is projected to decrease by approximately nine inches by March 2090, resulting in snowpack that is less than four inches in height. If projections hold, this could worsen the overall region's access to surface and subsurface water, as a decrease in snowpack is often tied to less measurable water in streams, lakes, and reservoirs.
• More intense rainstorms and flooding. The potential for high-intensity rainfall events is increasing, raising the likelihood and frequency of flooding, particularly in FEMA-designated flood zones and other areas vulnerable to flooding events. • Precipitation. While total annual precipitation may remain relatively stable in the coming decades, the swings between wet and dry conditions are likely to intensify, leading to longer and more severe droughts and storm events. This could have implications for local agriculture, as these factors affect plant growth and yield and pest presence.

More frequent and extensive wildfires. Rising temperatures, more frequent extreme heat days, and prolonged dry periods will likely heighten wildfire risk in and around Reedley. Although wildfire hazards may not be as great of a risk in urbanized areas of the city, potential losses from wildfires in the region could include loss of human life, structures, critical infrastructure, natural Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
and cultural resources, water quality, air quality, and recreational opportunities, as well as economic losses due to damages of natural resources, grazing lands, crops, and local businesses.

How can the General Plan Address Climate Change?
General plans cover a broad range of topics, including land use, circulation, conservation, safety, air quality, and environmental justice. A well-crafted general plan can use policies across this range of topics to comprehensively address climate resilience in the local community. Given the potential for long-lasting implications of climate change over the coming decades, the City can plan for long-term climate resilience and mitigation through this General Plan update. A new Element that will be incorporated into the General Plan update covers environmental justice, which will address pollution exposure, access to clean air and healthy environments, and equitable access to resources across different communities and neighborhoods. The incorporation of this Element, as well as updates to other existing elements of the General Plan will strengthen the City's preparedness for climate and environmental hazards over the next 20 to 30 years.

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
The City of Reedley is one of 18 participating jurisdictions and Districts in the 2024 Fresno County Hazard Mitigation Plan, Fresno County, California which guides hazard mitigation planning to protect people and Hazard property within the cities of Clovis, Coalinga, Firebaugh, Mitigation Plan Fowler, Fresno, Kerman, Kingsburg, Mendota, Reedley, San ATE COEN Joaquin, Sanger, and Selma, the County of Fresno, the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, the Lower San Joaquin Levee District, the Sierra Resource Conservation
District/Highway 168 Fire Safe Council, the Kings River Conservation District, and the Westlands Water District. These jurisdictions form the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC), an entity that identifies and assesses potential hazards that are likely to impact the county, identifies goals and objectives to reduce the County's vulnerability to hazards, and works with prominent stakeholders to achieve their objectives.

Hazard mitigation planning is critical to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards. Fresno County and the other participating jurisdictions developed this multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan to encourage whole community involvement in ensuring that County residents are less vulnerable to future hazard events. The Plan was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 so that Fresno County would be eligible for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants, including Pre-Disaster Mitigation and Hazard Mitigation Grant programs, as well as lower flood insurance premiums. The updated Plan also complies with FEMA guidance and California Office of Emergency Services guidelines for Local Hazard Mitigation Plans.

SAF-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Safety & Hazards Existing Conditions and Trends
References
California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey, 2025, available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam, accessed January 23, 2026.

California Department of Conservation, Earthquake Shaking Potential for California, 2025, available at:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/sh/earthquake-shaking-potential, accessed January 23, 2026.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire Hazard Severity Zones, available at:
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard- severity-zones, accessed January 23, 2026.

County of Fresno, Hazard Mitigation Plan, June 24, 2025, available at:
https://cms9files.revize.com/selma/2024%20Fresno%20County%20Hazard%20Mitigation%20Plan% 20(1).pdf?t=202509122035460&t=202509122035460, accessed January 22, 2026.

County of Fresno, Household Hazardous Waste, 2026, available at: https://www.fresnocountyca.gov/ Departments/Public-Works-and-Planning/divisions-of-public-works-and-planning/resources-and- parks-division/recycling-and-solid-waste-disposal/household-haz, accessed January 23, 2026.

Earthquake Track, Recent Earthquakes Near Reedley, California, United States, 2026, available at:
https://earthquaketrack.com/us-ca-reedley/recent, accessed January 23, 2026.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Hazard Layer, May 20, 2024, available at:
https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html? id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa9cd, accessed January 23, 2026.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | SAF-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
This page is intentionally left blank.

SAF-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity
The planning and design of communities can directly impact the health of their residents. Minimizing pollution exposure and creating equitable access to resources that allow people of all ages and abilities to lead healthy lives and be civically engaged is key to improving health outcomes as well as social, environmental, and economic well-being. This chapter provides an overview of factors affecting health and equity in Reedley, including pollution exposure, healthy food access, public facilities, safe housing, civic engagement, and the built environment.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026| HE-1 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
What Makes a Healthy Community?
A healthy community is one where everyone, regardless of income, age, ability, or background, can live a safe, fulfilling, and healthy life. This means having access to clean air and water, safe and affordable housing, parks and open space, reliable transportation, healthy food options, and essential services such as medical and educational facilities. It also means being protected from environmental hazards such as pollution, excessive heat, flooding, and traffic-related safety risks.

Conditions of a healthy community are not always experienced equally, with some neighborhoods and populations facing greater challenges than others. Understanding where disparities exist helps the City identify needs, prioritize investments, and ensure that future decisions support the health and well-being of all residents, often referred to as "environmental justice".

What is Environmental Justice?
Environmental justice refers to the fair and equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens across different communities, regardless of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other factors. It emphasizes the right of all individuals and communities to enjoy a clean and healthy environment, free from pollution, hazardous waste, and other environmental hazards.

Notable State Laws
Senate Bill (SB) 1000, California Government Code Section 65302(h), requires local jurisdictions to incorporate environmental justice in their general plans by developing policies to reduce disproportionate exposure to pollution in neighborhoods that also experience increased social and economic challenges. As defined by SB 1000, these neighborhoods that are disproportionately affected by environmental justice are known as "disadvantaged communities.".

Identifying Disadvantaged Communities
Under State law, local governments are required to perform an assessment to determine if and where disadvantaged communities are located in their planning area.

Methodology
The City of Reedley used a variety of regional and statewide databases and geospatial screening tools to analyze socioeconomic, environmental, and health factors in the city and identify any disadvantaged communities within the Reedley planning area.

Health and Equity Screening Tools
CalEnviroScreen (CES) 4.0 is a screening tool developed by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) that uses 21 indicators to assess pollution burdens and HE-2 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
population vulnerabilities for each census tract in California. Individual indicator scores for each census tract are summarized into two primary metrics: pollution burden and population characteristics, which are combined to determine an overall CES score. Census tracts in the top 25 percent of overall CES scores (percentile scores between 75 and 100) are identified as disadvantaged communities by the CaLEPA.

California Healthy Places Index (HPI) is an open data and policy platform developed by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California that evaluates 23 indicators of health, including socioeconomic status, access to transportation and parks, urban tree canopy, and healthcare access. Based on this analysis, HPI produces a percentile score ranking from 1 to 99 that compares the impact of indicators with census tracts in California, where the higher the number the healthier the community.

Reedley's Health and Equity Percentile Scores
Table 9-1 shows the overall CES 4.0 and HPI percentile scores for each census tract in Reedley. All but one census tract in Reedley falls within the top 15 percentile of CES 4.0 scores, meaning that these census tracts have worse environmental and/or socioeconomic impacts than 85 percent of other census tracts in California. Similarly, all but two census tracts in Reedley fall within the bottom 25 percentile of HPI scores, meaning that these census tracts have healthier community conditions than less than 25 percent of other census tracts in California.

The following sections of this Chapter provide more details about key health, environmental, and socioeconomic indicators contributing to Reedley's health and equity percentile scores.

Table 9-1 Reedley CES 4.0 and HPI Percentile Scores (by Census Tract) CalEnviroScreen (CES) 4.0 Healthy Places Index (HPI)
Census Tract
(high score = less healthy conditions) (low score = less healthy conditions) Tract 63 64 49
Tract 66.02 96 8
Tract 66.03 85 16
Tract 66.04 92 7
Tract 67 87 35
Source: OEHHA CalEnviroScreen 4.0 (2022) and Healthy Places Index (2022) A note about Reedley's census tracts. The health and equity screening tools used for this chapter use 2010 census tract boundaries for their assessment and do not reflect the 2020 redistricting process which resulted in Tract 66.04 being split into two tracts (66.05 and 66.06).

Additionally, Tract 63 extends far beyond Reedley, with only a small portion of the census tract falling within the city limits
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-3 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 9-1 CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Cumulative Scores, Reedley 69 63.02
•E Sumner Ave

63.01 66.03
W Cypress Ave E Sypress Avi

66.05 ahmine Ave

66.06 68.02 E North Ave
C-Springlind Avc-
W Eymann Ave
E Duff Ave

66.02 W Dinuba Ave EDinuba Ave
67 WOlson Ave EOlson Ave
W. Huntsman Ave Selluntsenarsive

3.03 4.01

72.04 4.02

0.5 1.5
Miles
- City Limits CALENVIROSCREEN 4.0 SCORE
LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) 0-10 (Lowest Scores) 7 City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI) >10 - 20
>20 - 30
GP2030 Study Area
>30 - 40
2020 Census Tracts >40 - 50

63.02 |
>50 - 60
>60 - 70
>70 - 80
>80 - 90

0.25 0.5
>90 - 100 (Highest Scores) Miles
Last updated: May 19, 2026
Source: ОЕННА CalEnviroScreen 4.0 (2022)
HE-4 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
Figure 9-2 Healthy Places Index Scores, Reedley
Claytan Ave
& Smith Ave SLae Jac Ave
Ave
E Adams Ave
Hillerest &
Wahtoke railroad
Sumner Ave
E South Ave E South Ave
S Buttonwillow Ave S Englehart Ave Rio Ave
-Ave- E Partier Ave
N-Ree
-W-Manning Ave E Manning Ave
J31
Reedley
S Englehart Ave S Pedersen Ave
-W-Olson Ave
E Huntsman Ave E Huntsman Ave
live E Floral Aver
-Ave 430
-Ave 428
Ave
— Ave 426
California Healthy
Places Index 3.0 Score
(Higher Value = Healthier
Conditions) (v3.0)
Percentile Ranking
Less → More healthy community conditions
0 25 50 75 100 Excluded
Source: Healthy Places Index (2022)
Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-5 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Environmental Hazards and Exposure
Air Pollution
Exposure to air pollution can adversely affect health and quality of life, particularly for vulnerable populations including children, older adults, and people with existing health conditions. Air pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ground-level ozone (also known as smog) often come from chemicals released from vehicles, factories, farms, and construction, and can irritate lungs, cause inflammation, and worsen chronic illnesses such as asthma. Reedley has a high concentration of both ground-level ozone and PM2.5, with all census tracts having a CES 4.0 percentile score between 89 to 91 for ozone concentration and between 94 and 97 for PM2.5 concentration. This means Reedley experiences higher rates of air pollution from ozone and PM2.5 than at least 89 percent of all other census tracts in California.

Pesticide Use
Pesticides applied to agricultural fields can become airborne and drift to neighboring communities, becoming a significant source of Pesticides with the highest pollution exposure to residents. Chronic and/or high-level use in Reedley include:
exposure to some pesticides can cause serious health issues such • 1,3-dichloropropene
as respiratory illnesses, birth defects, cancer, and neurological • Ziram
impacts. As with many agricultural communities, Reedley has an increased risk for pesticide exposure due to proximity to • Chlorpyrifos agricultural fields. All Reedley census tracts have a CES 4.0 • Paraquat dichloride pesticide use percentile score between 80 and 94, which represents the reported use of hazardous and volatile pesticides.

Groundwater Threats
Hazardous chemicals such as gasoline, solvents, and heavy metals used for heavy commercial or industrial purposes are often stored in containers or in underground storage tanks. Leaks from these storage tanks have the potential to contaminate soil and groundwater. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) tracks sites where leaks have contaminated the soil or groundwater and oversees the cleanup process of the site. There are four active cleanup sites in Reedley, one of which is a leaking underground storage tank (LUST). These sites mostly impact Census Tracts 66.02 and 67.

HE-6 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
Extreme Heat
Prolonged periods of high temperatures can have
serious health impacts, increasing the risk of heat- An extreme heat day is when the outdoor temperature reaches or exceeds
related illness, worsening existing health conditions,
and straining energy and water infrastructure. These 100 degrees Fahrenheit. At these impacts are often felt the most by low-income temperatures, the risk of heat related households, older adults, individuals with preexisting illness is possible. For vulnerable health conditions, and neighborhoods without populations (e.g., elderly, children, adequate trees or updated household cooling systems. outdoor laborers) the risk of heat related Extreme heat events are projected to become more illness is possible at 90-95 degrees Fahrenheit.
frequent and severe over time. The number of extreme
heat days in Reedley is projected to increase from a
historic annual average of 26 extreme heat days per year to an average of 57 extreme heat days per year by midcentury and an average of 73 extreme heat days per year by end of century.

Safe and Sanitary Housing
Housing conditions can contribute heavily to the health and safety of residents. Occupants of housing built before the widespread adoption of building standards and regulations are at higher risk of pollution exposure in their homes, particularly asbestos and lead paint. Additionally, older housing tends to require more expensive repairs to keep the dwelling areas at a high standard of living or retrofit to better handle higher external temperatures. Housing located near pollution-generating land uses (e.g., agricultural fields, industrial uses, highways) can also affect the health and safety of residents by increasing the exposure to pollutants.

Housing Conditions
According to the USEPA, homes built before 1978 are at a higher risk of lead-based paint (LBP) exposure if proper mitigation measures have not been taken in the home to remove LBP. As of 2024, there are about 7,204 housing units in Reedley, of which about 48 percent were built before 1980.

Additionally, about 76 percent of the housing units in Reedley were built before 2000, which means the housing stock in Reedley is aging and many units may start needing more significant repairs or upgrades such as HVAC system, plumbing, or roofing issues.

Housing Cost
The percentage of household income spent on housing expenses (e.g., rent, mortgage, utilities) can have a major impact on financial, emotional, and mental well-being. Households spending 30 to 50 percent, or more, on housing are considered housing cost burdened. These households may not as financially stable to afford healthcare, healthy food, emergency expenses, or establish savings. As shown in Table Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-7 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
9-2, about 49 percent of renters and 20 percent of homeowners are housing cost burdened. Of those cost burdened households, about 90 percent are low-income households.

Table 9-2 Reedley Housing Cost Burden (by tenure)
Renter Owner Total Households
Paying 30-50 percent of income on housing 26% 11% 18%
Paying over 50 percent of income on housing 24% 9% 16%
Total cost burdened households 49% 20% 34%
Percent of cost burdened households that are
98% 75% 90%
also low-income households*
*Low-income households are considered those making 80 percent, or less, of the area median income.

Source: U.S. Department of Urban Development CHAS Data (2022) Food Access
Access to healthy, affordable, and culturally appropriate food is key to high quality of life in any community. Barriers to households accessing healthy food are limited income, high costs of living, and physical proximity or transportation to get to grocery stores. Poor nutrition can often cause individual health to worsen overtime and can even lead to chronic health issues like obesity and diabetes.

Food Environment
There are currently seven grocery stores in Reedley. Four of these stores are traditional grocery stores or supermarkets with a variety of products and three specialty grocery stores that offer a limited range of produce and/or grocery products, often culturally specific. For the purposes of this document, only grocery stores that sell fresh produce and standard grocery items (e.g., milk, eggs, bread, meat) were included, convenience stores were not included.
• El Pueblo Food Market. A smaller grocery store that offers a variety of produce, meat, dairy, dry goods, and a variety of Hispanic grocery products.
• La Familia Market. A smaller market that offers a variety of dry goods and has an expansive meat counter specializing in Hispanic meat cuts.
• Town & Country Supermarket. A larger traditional supermarket that has a variety of fresh produce, dry goods, a meat counter, tortilleria, and bakery. • City Market. A smaller market that includes a meat counter, fresh produce, and a limited selection of other grocery items.
• Baby's Nutrition. A small grocery store located next to the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program office that specializes in WIC approved products such as produce, baby food, cereal, and dairy products.

HE-8 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
• Save Mart. A traditional large supermarket that offers a wide variety of produce, meats, dairy, and dry goods.
• United Market. A traditional large supermarket that offers a wide variety of produce, meats, dairy, dry goods, and some bulk items.

In addition to traditional grocery stores, Reedley College hosts a farmers market September through November and April through May on Thursday evenings, and there are two food banks (Full Gospel Tabernacle and St Anthony's Food Pantry) that offer grocery pick-up once a month year-round.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-9 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 9-3 Reedley Grocery Stores
mE Sumner Aver
E Olson Ave

0.5 1.5
Miles
City Limits
" LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SO1)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOl)
GP2030 Study Area Hedey
irport

EXISTING LAND USE
Residential Parcels

GROCERY STORES
• Supermarket
• Limited/Specialty 0 0.25 0.5
- Miles
1/2 Mile Buffer
Last updated: May 19, 2026
HE-10 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
Food Insecurity
While physical proximity to grocery stores is important, households may still lack the income, skills, or nutritional education to buy and prepare healthy food on a regular basis. Table 9-3 shows the median household incomes and the percent of people living below twice the federal poverty level for each census tract. The CES 4.0 poverty indicator scores for all Reedley census tracts are between the 79th and 97th percentile, which means the percent of people living below twice the poverty level is higher than 79 to 97 percent of the census tracts in California.

Table 9-3 Reedley Housing Cost Burden (by tenure)
Tract 66.02 Tract 66.03 Tract 66.05 Tract 66.06 Tract 67 Median household income* $42,380 $81,042 $83,566 $60,118 $93,698 Individuals living below twice 62% 58% 68% 68% 47%
the federal poverty level**
*Median household income is reported for a household size of four. ** Twice the poverty level is used due to the high cost of living in California Source: American Community Survey, Table S1901 (2023); CES 4.0 (2021) Community Facilities
Access to high-quality community facilities and services can help support heathy and safe lifestyles and foster a sense of community. Community facilities include parks, community centers, education, transportation, and medical services.

Parks
Access to high-quality and well-maintained parks provides residents with open space areas in their neighborhoods to gather, be outdoors, and get physical activity. Reedley has nine parks, including several open space areas along or near the Kings River. Figure 9-4 shows residential parcels within a half mile of a park. Additional information on each park can be found in the Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure chapter of this document. According to the California Healthy Places Index, all Reedley census tracts have relatively high rates of park access than other census tracts in California, with 95 to 97 percent of people being within ½ mile of a park, beach, or open space area.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-11 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
Figure 9-4 Reedley Parks
Norind
E Springfield Ave
E Duff Avo
•E Dinuba Ave
E Olson Ave
0 0.5 1.5 2
Miles
City Limits
* LAFCO-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
City-Approved Sphere of Influence (SOI)
GP2030 Study Area
Parks
1/2 Mile Buffer

EXISTING LAND USE
Residential Parcels
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Last updated: May 19, 2026
HE-12 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
Education
Higher educational attainment is strongly correlated with higher income and opportunity. Educational facilities provide not only secondary education for children, but also career training and continuing education opportunities for adults. Reedley has nine secondary education schools, two of which are private schools, and one college/university (Reedley College). According to CES 4.0 data, Reedley has low educational attainment rate across all census tracts. The percent of adults in each census tract without a high school diploma ranges from 26 to 51 percent, which is 74 to 97 percent higher than other census tracts in California.

Libraries
Reedley has one public library branch that is in the process of being constructed in a more central Location in downtown Reedley. The new library will be almost triple the size of the existing library and include more gathering areas within the building, study rooms, and extended internet service available.

Medical and Emergency Services
Access to high quality preventative, emergency, and specialty healthcare is important to maintaining good health and screening for and treating serious health issues. Reedley has one acute care hospital that provides a full range of medical services including an emergency room, a surgical center, a birthing center, imaging, women's health, and pediatric care. The city also has three other hospitals (United Health Centers and two Family HealthCare locations) that offer urgent care centers, family medicine, women's health, and pediatric care.

The Reedley Fire Department provides emergency medical and fire protection services to the Reedley community. More information about the Fire Department can be found in the Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure chapter of this document.

Sequoia Safety Council (SSC) also provides emergency ambulatory services to the Reedley community.

SSC has a station in Reedley that responds to local emergency medical calls.

Community Centers and Recreational Facilities
Community centers and recreational facilities can improve quality of life by promoting mental and emotional health through social engagement, educational enrichment, and physical activity. Reedley has one community center that is centrally located in the city, which provides activities and programming for children, adults, and senior citizens. Programming includes recreational sports, crafting and art activities, youth camps, and senior meals and outings.

Civic Engagement
Civically engaged residents from a variety of backgrounds leads to more meaningful public input and a more effective planning process that cater to the needs of all residents. Common barriers to engagement Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-13 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
include language and translation services, time and location of meetings, City outreach strategies, and establishing trust with community members.

Language Isolation
Reedley has a large Mexican-American population, many speaking limited or no English. This can create a major language barrier when it comes to being informed and engaged with the public decision making process. Table 9-4 shows the percentage of households in each census tract that do not speak English well and the associated CES 4.0 linguistic isolation percentile. Most of these households are Spanish- speaking, with some households speaking Tagalog and Vietnamese.

The City has already implemented several efforts to ensure non-English speaking households have the opportunity to meaningfully engage with the public-decision making process in Reedley. These efforts include:
• Police Department outreach programs to apartment complexes throughout the city. • Providing live translation and instant e-translation services at all public meetings. • Upgraded bodycam technology for the Police Department that allows for instant translation to several languages.

Table 9-4 Linguistic Isolation, Reedley
ract 66.02 Tract 66.03 Tract 66.05 Tract 66.06 Tract 67 Percent of households that do 26% n/a 17% 17% 13%
not speak English well
CES 4.0 Linguistic Isolation 93 n/a 81 81 70
Percentile Score
Source: CES 4.0 (2021)
Voter Response Rate
One way of measuring a community's involvement is by analyzing voter response rate. According to the California Healthy Places Index, Reedley has a low voter response rate compared to other census tracts in California, ranging from 65 percent (11t percentile) to 79 percent (48th percentile) of registered voters voting in the 2020 general election, compared to the countywide rate of 73 percent and statewide rate of 79 percent.

HE-14 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 Health and Equity Existing Conditions and Trends
References
American Community Survey, Table S1901, 2023, accessed February 2, 2026.

Cal-Adapt, Extreme Heat Days and Warm Nights, available at: https://cmip5.cal- adapt.org/tools/extreme-heat/, accessed May 20, 2026
California Healthy Places Index, Healthy Places Index, 2022, available at:
https://www.healthyplacesindex.org, accessed February 2, 2026.

California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, CalEnviroScreen 4.0, 2023, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40, accessed February 2, 2026.

U.S. Department of Urban Development, Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Data, 2022, available at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html, accessed February 2, 2026.

Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026 | HE-15 City of Reedley 2050 General Plan
This page is intentionally left blank.

HE-16 | Public Review Draft Existing Conditions and Trends Workbook, July 2026

← All documents from this meeting