Rialto City Council
January 11, 2022

City of Rialto PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE1

Pavement Management ProgramThe City first used a Pavement Management Program(PMP) in 2007.The PMP provides an objective method for inspecting andrating the condition of the City’s roadways based on aPavement Condition Index (PCI) score.The PMP was updated in 2013, and a presentation wasgiven to City Council on Nov. 26, 2013, with policydirection to focus street repairs on streets with highervolumes of traffic (Arterials).2 Pavement Management ProgramBased on that policy direction, between 2013 to 2018 theCity completed street maintenance projects on 13 milesof streets and slurry sealed 99 miles of streets.The PMP was last updated in 2019 with report completedin January 2020.The PMP Update is now being presented to the CityCouncil.3 Rialto Street Network: 2019 PMP UpdateThe PMP evaluated the pavement condition by identifying arepresentative “PCI” Score for each separate street segment280.1 miles of streets1,888 individually designated street segments58,527,366 square feet of roadway pavementAlleys = 8.4 milesLocal Residential Streets = 161.9 milesArterial/Collector Streets = 109.8 miles4 PCI Score Determined by Asphalt Distress
5 PCI Score Determined by Asphalt Distress
6 PCI Score Determined by Asphalt Distress
7 PCI Score Range
8 Rialto Street System PCI Scores
9 Overall PCI Score = 73.9 or Fair/GoodPCI Score increased from 67.3 in 2013 PCI Distribution: Arterial/Collector Streets
1059% are in Good/Very Good condition41% remain in Very Poor/Poor/Fair condition

PCI Distribution: Local Residential Streets
1158% are in Good/Very Good condition42% remain in Very Poor/Poor/Fair condition

PCI Distribution: Alley Streets
1220% are in Good/Very Good condition80% remain in Very Poor/Poor/Fair condition

Pavement Life Cycle
13 15 Years
Rialto Street System – Slurry Seal Zone Map
14 Previously Approved Street List
15 City developed annual slurry seal projects using PMP toidentify streets in each ZoneSlurry seal projects were scheduled in Zones 1, 2 and 3with some streets having a poor pavement condition notsuitable for slurry sealStaff developed list of streets for reconstruction or overlaythat were deferred from the slurry seal projects based ontheir poor pavement condition Map of Previously Approved Streets16

Previously Approved Street List
17 Staff proceeded on project to reconstruct the previouslyapproved list of streetsList did not consider the Council’s priority of selectingstreets based on traffic volumes (street classification) ANDpavement conditionList included streets with better pavement condition thanothers, and all streets located north of Foothill Blvd.City Manager requested re-evaluation of selected streets Revised Street List based on Street Classification
18 Revised Street List based on Street Classification
19 Rialto Street System is a Grid NetworkMajor Arterials (ADT = 10k to 40k)Secondary Arterials (ADT = 4k to 15k)Collector Streets (ADT = 2k to 5k)Local Residential Streets (ADT = <2k) Major Arterial Street PCI Scores
20 Major Arterial Streets
21 Riverside Avenue (Segment 6) has worst condition (PCI =51); plans prepared and are being revised for rebid toaddress traffic impacts during constructionPepper Avenue (PCI = 60) will be reconstructed by City ofSan Bernardino with Cooperative Agreement with RialtoCedar Avenue (PCI = 63), recommend including 3segments in the Revised List of Streets with PCI = 48, 52and 55 Major Arterial Streets
22 Riverside Avenue (Segment 2) (PCI = 70); contractawarded and work scheduled to start January 2022; workwill require utility coordination with shallow water linesRiverside Avenue (Segment 4) (PCI = 73) has been addedat City Council direction; plans to be prepared for biddingin March 2022; work may require utility coordination withold/shallow water linesCedar Avenue (PCI = 63), recommend including 3segments in the Revised List of Streets with PCI = 48, 52and 55 Selected Major Arterial Streets
23 Evaluating specific roadway segments with low PCI Scores,recommendation to include the following Arterial Streetsin the 2021/2022 Street Reconstruction Project:Cactus Avenue: City Limit to Walnut Avenue; PCI = 54Cedar Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue to Rialto Avenue; PCI =52 to 55Cedar Avenue: Merrill Avenue to Randall Avenue; PCI = 48Rialto Avenue: Maple Avenue to Linden Avenue; PCI = 59 Secondary Arterial Street PCI Scores
24 Selected Secondary Arterial Streets
25 Evaluating specific roadway segments with low PCI Scores,recommendation to include the following SecondaryArterial Streets in the 2021/2022 Street ReconstructionProject:Casa Grande Dr: Alder Ave to Locust Ave; PCI = 55Linden Ave: Riverside Ave to Persimmon Ave; PCI = 53Linden Ave: Norwood St to Casmalia St; PCI = 56Locust Ave: Riverside Ave to Casmalia St; PCI = 18 – 61 Selected Secondary Arterial Streets
26 Maple Ave: West Coast Blvd to Summit Ave; PCI = 60Maple Ave (East ½): Baseline Rd to Etiwanda Ave; PCI = 40West ½ in Fontana, recommend east ½ only or can coordinatewith Fontana on joint projectMerrill Ave: Riverside Ave to Eucalyptus Ave; PCI = 45 – 59Santa Ana Ave: Lilac Ave to Riverside Ave; PCI = 8 – 14 Collector Street PCI Scores
27 Selected Collector Streets
28 Evaluating specific roadway segments with low PCI Scores,recommendation to include the following CollectorStreets in the 2021/2022 Street Reconstruction Project:Acacia Ave: Rialto Ave to Merrill Ave; PCI = 55Bohnert Ave: Ayala Dr to Cactus Ave; PCI = 28 – 35Bohnert Ave: Cedar Ave to Ayala Dr; PCI = 60Easton St: West of Brampton to City Limit; PCI = 45-47Etiwanda Ave: Maple Ave to Cedar Ave; PCI = 57 – 62 Selected Collector Streets
29 Etiwanda Ave: Cactus Ave to Willow Ave; PCI = 42 – 61Etiwanda Ave: Sycamore Ave to Eucalyptus Ave; PCI = 59-62Eucalyptus Ave: Walnut Ave to Baseline Rd; PCI = 49Eucalyptus Ave: Rialto Ave to Carter St; PCI = 22 – 50*Eucalyptus Ave: Etiwanda Ave to Foothill Blvd; PCI = 45**Note these segments are shared with City of San Bernardino,recommend joint project with City as lead Selected Collector Streets
30 Lilac Ave: Easton St to Walnut Ave; PCI = 31 – 48**Note this segment is shared with San Bernardino County,recommend joint project with City as lead• Lilac Ave: Foothill Blvd to Rialto Ave; PCI = 62• Meridian Ave: Baseline Rd to Madrona Rd; PCI = 36• Randall Ave: Riverside Ave to Sycamore Ave; PCI = 62• Santa Ana Ave: Riverside Ave to East End; PCI = 17 Selected Collector Streets
31 Summit Ave: Maple Ave to Cedar Ave; PCI = 40 – 56Sycamore Ave: Etiwanda Ave to Foothill Blvd; PCI = 39 – 42Sycamore Ave; Wilson St to Randall Ave; PCI = 63 Revised List of Streets
32 Major Arterial, Secondary Arterial and Collector Streets52 individual street segments throughout RialtoPCI scores 8 to 6315.2 miles3,500,000 square feet of pavementEstimated cost = $20,125,000 Street Repair Costs
33 Full Depth Reclamation Process
34 Sustainable: Reuses existing asphalt concrete pavementPulverizes asphalt, processes with existing base materialand subgradeAllows for reconstruction of roadway using existingmaterialsEstablishes reconstructed subgrade for improvedstructural sectionFinished with new asphalt concrete pavement Full Depth Reclamation Process
35 Funding Sources
36 Annual Sources of Revenue:Measure I Sales Tax: $1.9 millionGas Tax: $1.8 million*SB 1 New Gas Tax: $2.1 millionPavement Maintenance Fee: $2.4 million$8.2 million*Revenue is $2.8 million with $1 million transferred to General Fund forStreet/Traffic Maintenance Division personnel costs Available Funding
37 Measure I Sales Tax: $6.6 millionGas Tax: $3.6 millionSB 1 New Gas Tax: $5.8 millionPavement Maintenance Fee: $7.7 millionARPA Funds: $10 millionFY 21/22 Appropriation $10 million$43.7 million Committed Funding
38 Riverside Ave. (Segment 6): $8.3 millionRiverside Ave. (Segment 2): $7.7 millionRiverside Ave. (Segment 4): $6 millionPepper Ave. Joint Project: $3.6 million$25.6 million$18.1 million available for this project. Cost estimate is$17.5 million @ $5 / SF; anticipate competitive bids.

Recommendations
39 Review and Approve the Revised List of City StreetsScheduled for Overlay and Reconstruction;Authorize Staff to Coordinate with Adjacent Jurisdictionson Cooperative Agreements for Reconstruction ofEucalyptus Avenue and Lilac Avenue;Adopt the Resolution Amending the List of ProjectsFunded by SB-1: the Road Repair and Accountability Actof 2017; andAuthorize the Release of Request for Bids for the FiscalYear 2021-2022 Street Rehabilitation Project, City ProjectNo. 210804