Rialto City Council
April 12, 2022

Page-1

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF RIALTO AND

PRESCIENCE CORPORATION
THIS ON CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 12th day of April, 2022, by and between the City of Rialto, a municipal corporation and California general law city (“City”), and Prescience Corporation, a California corporation, (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by request for qualifications the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 1 of this Agreement.

B. Following the submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, Consultant was selected by the City to be eligible to perform those services as needed and requested by the City.

C. During the Term of this Agreement, the City may initiate or continue various projects for which Consultant’s services may be used. For a given project, the City may solicit proposals from Consultant and other firms to perform services on that project, and the City may award a Task Order for the project based on availability, schedule, and cost proposal. Consultant understands and acknowledges that this Agreement provides no guarantee that Consultant will be selected to perform any volume or work for the City.

D. Pursuant to Chapter 2.48 of the Rialto Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consul tant for the performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

Scope of Services . Contractor agrees to perform on- call construction management, inspection and mater ials testing services associated with Request for Proposals No. 22- 048 “On -Call” Construction Management, Inspection, and Materials Testing Services (hereinafter, the “Scope of Services” or “Services”) as requested and authorized by the City. The Scope of Services are more particularly described in Exhibit Page-2
“A” attached hereto and incorporated herein. When the City desires to utilize Contractor for the Scope of Services, the City will issue a Task Order that includes a Scope of Services to be performed and the compensation to b e paid for the Services within the Task Order. Upon the issuance of a Task Order, that Task Order shall immediately be incorporated into this Agreement as part of Exhibit “A” (e.g., the first Task Order will be Exhibit “A-1”, the second Exhibit “A -2,” etc.). Each Task Order is made a part of t his Agreement by this reference and encompassed within the Scope of Services of this Agreement.

As a material inducement for City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, it meets all local, state, and federal requirements in performing the Services, and it is experienced in performing the work and Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently, and to the best of its ability, experience, and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more professional firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

The Agreement between the Parties shall consist of the following: (1) this Agreement, including the Recitals; (2) the Scope of Services , including all Task Orders ; (3) the City’s Request for Qualifications No. 22-048; and, (4) the Consultant’s signed, original proposal submitted to the City (“Consultant’s Proposal”), (collectively referred to as the “Contract Documents”). The Contract Documents and Accepted Proposal shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the Scope of Services , Consultant’s Proposal , and/or this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any federal, state, or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. In addition to the terms, conditions, and performance obligations for the Work set forth in this Contract, Consultant must also c omply with the federal contract terms, conditions, rules, and regulations set forth in the attached Exhibit B (“Federal Contract Terms, Conditions, and Regulations”).

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain, at its sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the Services required by this Page-3
Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its officer s, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. If Consultant discovers any latent or unknown conditions that will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, then Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at City’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.6 Care of Work.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies, and/or other components thereof, to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.7 Prevailing Wages.

Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq. and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “Public Works” and “Maintenance” projects. It is the understanding of City and Consultant that the Prevailing Wage Laws may not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder. However, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents, and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless specified in this Agreement, neither Party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.9 Additional Services.

Page-4
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services under an individual Task Order, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to, or deducting from said work. No such extra work or change may be undertaken unless a written order is first g iven by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, describing in detail the extra work or change and the reason(s) therefor and incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Task Order sum for the actual cost of the extra work or change, and/or (ii) the time to perform the Task Order , which said adjustments shall be reflected in an amendment to the Task Order subject to the written approval of the Parties . Any amendment to a Task Order shall be reviewed and approved by the City Manager. In accordance with Rialto Municipal Code section 2.48.180, i ncreases in compensation for a Task Order may be approved by the City Manager provided: (a) the initial Task Order amount was less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) and the amended Task Order sum when cons idering any or all amendments will not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000); or (b) the Task Order was approved by the City Council and the increases in compensation taken either separately or cumulatively do not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000). Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively must be approved by the City Council. Payment for additional services rendered by Consultant under a given Task Order requires the submission of the actual costs of Consultant’s performance of the extra work with the invoice(s) for the extra work claim(s), as provided in Section 2.4. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other contractors.

No claim for an adjustment in the contract amount or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

2.1 Contract Sum.

City and Consultant acknowledge and agree that the Services required by this Agreement will vary dependent upon the number, type, and extent of the Services the Consultant shall provide; and no guarantee of the extent or the type of Services required of Consultant under the terms of this Agreement is made by the City. The annual or total level of Services required by this Agreement is unknown, and may significantly increase or decrease from year to year. In acknowledgement of the fact that the number and type of projects requiring the Consultant’s Services has not been identified for this Agreement, City and Consultant acknowledge and agree that a specific “Maximum Contract Amount” shall be imposed on each separate project that the City may assign Consultant as provided in Section 1.9 and in this Section 2.1. Each such separate project shall be identified as a Task Order authorized by the City Manager or designee as provided in this Section 2.1. T he Maximum C ontract Amount of this Agreement is undefined, and is subject to the number and type of projects requiring the Consultant’s Services throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, if any. Consultant’s compensation shall be limited to the Maximum Contract Amount identified on each separate, individually Page-5
authorized Task Order corresponding to a project requiring the Services of the Consultant in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation set forth in the attached Exhibit “C” .

Subsequent approval of individual Task Orders shall be approved in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2.48 of the Rialto Municipal Code.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii ) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services ; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the Services . If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.4 Invoices.

Unless otherwise specified by the Task Order, each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under t his Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub- category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

City may independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission.

2.5 No Waiver.

Page-6
Review and payment by City to Consultant of any invoice for work performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any defects in work performed by Consultant or of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

The Services authorized by each Task Order shall be completed pursuant to the schedule stated in the Task Order. Should the Services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Contractor shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Contractor to continue performing the Services.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes , freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall, within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay, notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Cont ract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer shall extend the time for performance in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section

1.9. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Subject to the termination provisions of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for three years commencing on the date first ascribed above. City may extend the Term of this Agreement two times for one year each time, for a total potential term of five years.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.

Page-7
The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Peter Ho, PE President
(Name) (Title)

It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent pers onnel to perform Services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or subcontractor of Consultant, Consultant shall, immediately upon a Reassign Notice from City of such desire of City, reassign such persons or persons.

4.2 Status of Consultant.

Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care, or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.

4.3 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be the City Manager or other such person designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer.

Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager , to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

Page-8

4.4 Independent Contractor.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation, or hours of service.

Consultant shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shal l release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS

5.1 Insurance Coverages.

The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents of City:
(a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance (Occurrence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit.
(b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure, and provide legal defense for both the Page-9
Consultant and the City against any loss, claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or Services contemplated in this Agreement.
(c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non- owned, leased, and hired cars.
(d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of, or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s Services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
(e) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements.
(f) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.

All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents as additional insureds, and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees, or agents shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees, and agents and their respective insurers. The insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self -insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self -insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any Party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or Services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City.

Page-10
City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsi ble nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3.

In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City.

5.3 Indemnification.

To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations, or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), arising from Consultant’s reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents, or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations Page-11
or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.

Consultant shall incorporate similar, indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional Services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arisi ng out of the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Consultant’s Services are subject to California Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity, including the cost to defend, shall be limited to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8.

5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety.

Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or Services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager Consultant.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Page-12
Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services.

Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of 3 years following completion of the Services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest.

6.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the Ci ty is greatly concerned about the cost of work and Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially incr ease or decrease the cost of the work or Services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, m aps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or Page-13
disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, e mployees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including at torney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant.

However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to v alidity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.

In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Co urt, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, Eastern Division.

7.2 Disputes; Default.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall proceed with Page-14
payment on the invoices only when the default is cured. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any b reach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or Services by Consultant shall not constit ute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non- defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive i n this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.

Page-15

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contr act Officer. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer.

Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the City need not provide the Consultant with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, t ake over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set -off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest , directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement or any individual Task Order subsequently awarded.

Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shal l any such officer or employee participate in any decision Page-16
relating to the Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Additionally, pursuant to Rialto Municipal Code section 2.48.145, Consultant represents that it has disclosed whether it or its officers or employees is related to any officer or employee of the City by blood or marriage within the third degree which would subject such officer or employee to the prohibition of C alifornia Government Sections 87100 et. seq., Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation Section 18702, or Government Code Section 1090. To this end, by approving this Agreement, Consultant attests under penalty of perjury, personally and on behalf of Consultant, as well its officers, representatives, that it/they have no relationship, as described above, or financial interests, as such term is defined in California Government Section 87100 et. seq., Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation Section 18702, or Government Code Section 1090, with any City of Rialto elected or appointed official or employee, except as specifically disclosed to the City in writing.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to t heir race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class.

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or Services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (“City Facilities”), as may be reasonably necessary Page-17
for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing of City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet, or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.

9.2 Payment of Taxes.

Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any federal and state taxes.

9.3 Notices.

All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered, sent by pre- paid First Class U.S. Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered or sent by facsimile with attached evidence of completed transmission, and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i) the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice if delivered personally or by messenger or overnight courier; (ii) three (3) business days after the date of posting by the United States Post Office if by mail; or (iii) when sent if given by facsimile. Any notice, request, demand, direction, or other communication sent by facsimile must be confirmed within forty-eight (48) hours by letter mailed or delivered. Other forms of electronic transmission such as e- mails, text messages, instant messages are not acceptable manners of notice required hereunder.

Notices or other communications shall be addressed as follows:

If to City:

W
ith copy to:

I
f to Consultant:

City of Rialto
150 S. Palm Ave.

Rialto, CA 92376
Attn: City Manager
Tel: (909) 820-2525
Fax: (909) 820-2527
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
1770 Iowa Avenue, Suite 240
Riverside, CA 92507
Attn: Eric S. Vail, City Attorney
Tel: (951) 788-0100
Fax: (951) 788-5785
PreScience Corporation
125 Columbia, Suite A
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Attn: Peter Ho
Tel: (949) 600-8631
Fax: (949) 335-4610
Page-18
Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing.

9.4 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.5 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.6 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

9.7 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which ar e hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.8 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

Page-19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed and entered into this Agreement on the date first written above.

CITY: CONSULTANT:

CITY OF RIALTO, a municipal
corporation
PRESCIENCE CORPORATION, a
California corporation

By: By:

Marcus Fuller, City Manager Signature

ATTEST:

Name

By:

Barbara A. McGee, City Clerk
Title

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Signature

By:

Eric S. Vail, City Attorney Name

Title

**Two signatures are required if a
corporation**

A-1
EXHIBIT “A“

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall provide on- call construction management, inspection and materials testing services more generally described herein.

Consultant shall provide first class as-needed construction management, inspection and materials testing services associated with various City Projects. For work provided on assigned City Projects, the selected firm shall provide services as described in Chapter 16, “Administer Construction Contracts,” of the State of California Department of Transportation’s (“Caltrans”) Local Assistance Procedure Manual (“LAPM”). More specifically, construction management services shall include, but are not limited to:

Pr
e-Construction Phase:

1. Perform value engineering and constructability review of project plans and specifications.

2. Review engineer’s estimate and approved budget for the project.

3. Prepare and maintain a master project schedule based on anticipated completion of design and construction phases, integrating all reviews and approvals as may be required by City and other regulatory agencies.

4. Develop public outreach materials (in dual language, English/Spanish) and a neighborhood affairs strategy to advise affected property owners, businesses, and the general public, regarding the project. Develop and provide website and toll-free phone number for public inquiries and complaints; assign a neighborhood liaison to track complaints.

5. Preparation of required state/federal forms.

C
onstruction Phase

1. Arrange and conduct Pre-Construction meeting, inviting general contractor and project stakeholders. Prepare minutes of Pre- Construction meeting for distribution to all attendees.

2. Provide and maintain sufficient field personnel to administer and manage construction contract.

3. Review construction schedule, including activity sequences and duration, schedule of submittals and delivery schedule of long lead materials and equipment. Review contractor’s update and revisions as may be required to reflect actual progress of work.

4. Schedule and conduct weekly progress meetings to discuss contract issues, procedures, progress, problems, change orders, submittals, request for information (RFIs), deficiencies and schedules. Prepare minutes of progress meetings for distribution to all attendees.

5. Process contractor’s submittals for project architect’s/design consultant’s review and approval.

6. Process and track RFIs, submittals, shop drawings, proposed change orders and revisions.

A-2

7. Review , evaluate and negotiate proposed change orders. Review estimates for reasonableness and cost effectiveness and render recommendations to City.

8. Maintain cost accounting records on authorized work performed under contract unit costs and additional work performed based on actual costs of time (labor) and materials (T&M).

9. Develop a reasonable cost control system, including regular monitoring of actual costs for activities in progress and estimates for uncompleted tasks and proposed changes.

Identify variances between actual and estimated costs and report such variances to City at regular intervals.

10. Assist City in coordinating services of other consultants (geotechnical, NP DES, materials testing, deputy inspection, special laboratory testing, etc.) that may be hired or selected for the project.

11. Coordinate with project architect/design consultant contractor’s requests for interpretation or clarification of meaning and intent of project plans and specifications.

12. Establish and implement job safety procedures in compliance with CAL- OSHA requirements. Monitor contractor’s compliance with established safety program, respond to deficiencies and hazards, and investigate and report on accidents.

13. Track quantities of work completed for progress payment. Develop and implement procedures for review and processing of progress payment applications. Assist City with review and certification for payment.

14. Conduct field construct ion contractor employee interviews to comply with DIR , Prevailing Wage, and Public Contract Code Requirements. Interviews shall be reported to the City on a regular basis.

15. Establish procedures and monitor contractor compliance with federal and state prevailing wage regulations and requirements. Ensure that labor and hours reported by contractors match inspector’s daily diaries, inspection reports, and employee interviews.

16. Perform quality assurance reviews on a regular basis and recommend changes, as necessary.

17. Comply with federal and state grant funding requirements.

18. Prepare federal and state grant funding reimbursements.

19. Maintain a complete project filing system. Filing system shall be in accordance with Section 16.8 (Chapter 16) of the Caltrans LAPM.

20. As-need materials testing.

Po
st-Construction Phase

1. Evaluate completion of work and recommend to City when work is ready for final inspection.

2. Conduct final inspection/walk through with City staff, maintenance/service personnel and project architect/design consultant.

3. Issue preliminary and final punch list, including schedule for punch list completion.

Monitor and follow through with contractor until completion of all punch list items.

4. Secure and transmit required guarantees, certifications, affidavits, leases, easement deeds, operating & maintenance manuals, warranties, and other documents as stipulated in contract documents.

5. Review and process contractor’s request for final payment and release of retention.

A-3

6. Deliver project files to City.

C
onstruction inspection services shall include, but are not limited to:

1. Review plans, specifications, and other contract and construction- related documents.

Become familiar with traffic control plans, construction schedules, construction sequences, and permit requirements from other agencies.

2. Photographs prior, during, and after construction.

3. Attend pre-construction meetings and present special concerns, if any.

4. Interpret plans, specifications and regulations and ensure that contractors are following their contracts. Provide inspections to ensure projects are constructed according to project specifications.

5. Direct and notify construction contractors about non- compliance and correct compliance problems as soon as they are discovered.

6. Maintain daily diaries showing site and weather conditions; traffic control measures taken by contractors; labor, equipment and materials used; quantity of work performed; and major incidents/safety violations. Daily diaries shall be submitted to City upon project completion.

7. Review construction progress schedules on a regular basis; verify schedules are on track with project milestones; identify deviations; and ensure that corrective actions are taken to bring projects back on schedule.

8. Provide accurate measurements of work completed by contractors in accordance with contract documents.

9. Review soil compaction and materials testing certifications of compliance (COC).

Coordinate with City’s Acceptance Testing (AT) and Independent Assurance Program (IAP) testing firms regarding quality of work completed.

10. Ensure that contractors do not install materials without approved material testing certifications. Any failed tests shall be reported and direct contractor to take correction measures to achieve compliance.

11. Monitor contractors’ utility coordination to minimize utility conflict delays and potential need for utility relocations. Report potential conflicts to utilities, and advise them to relocate or remove conflicting utilities and report outcome to City.

12. Attend weekly progress meetings to communicate, coordinate and resolve any issues or problems that may arise at the job site. Prepare and submit to contractor a “Weekly Statement of Calendar/Working Days” report.

13. Conduct field construction employee interviews to comply with Equal Employment Opportunity Law and Davis Bacon Act. Interviews shall be reported to City on a regular basis.

14. Coordinate with contractor access to adjacent businesses/residents during construction. Coordinate mitigation of construction impacts with contractor, City and other agencies.

15. Provide inspection of street lighting, traffic control, channelization, and all other traffic- related work.

16. Observe construction safety, public safety and convenience, and report discovered problems to City.

A-4

17. Monitor compliance with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits and requirements. Monitor compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

18. Maintain data for change orders and record information regarding time of dispute, time of notification by contractor, and action taken by inspector.

19. Provide complete measurements and calculations to administer progress payment s and make recommendations for payments.

20. Ensure that contractors submit certified payroll reports with monthly progress payment requests. Review reports for compliance with federal and state prevailing wage regulations. Ensure that labor and hours reported by contractors match inspector’s daily diaries and inspection reports.

21. Prepare and transmit to contractors correspondence related to construction management and inspection of projects. All correspondence sent to and received from contractors shall be copied and transmitted to City.

22. Coordinate preparation and submittal of as-built plans to City upon project completion.

23. Prepare preliminary and final punch list and follow through with contractor until completion.

24. Upon project completion, conduct final inspection and close- out encroachment and construction/excavation permits.

A
dditional Optional Services
A
t the City’s sole discretion, as may be necessary to supplement existing staff, the Consultant may provide encroachment permit coordination and inspections (including work associated with public and private utility companies and/or their contractors).

For
work provided on miscellaneous encroachment permit inspections (including work associated with public and private utility companies and/or their contractors), the Consultant shall provide the following work:

1. R
eview plans, specifications, and other encroachment permit related documents.

Become familiar with traffic control plans, construction schedules, construction sequences, and permit requirements from other agencies.

2. Photograph prior, during, and after construction.

3. Attend pre-construction meetings and present special concerns, if any.

4. Provide inspections to ensure encroachments are constructed according to permit requirements.

5. Direct and notify encroachment permittees about non- compliance and correct compliance problems as soon as they are discovered.

6. Maintain daily diaries showing site and weather conditions; traffic control measures taken by contractors; labor, equipment and materials used; quantity of work performed; and major incidents/safety violations. Daily diaries shall be submitted to City upon project completion.

7. Ensure that encroachment permittees do not install materials without approved material testing certifications. Any failed tests shall be reported and direct encroachment permittees to take correction measures to achieve compliance.

A-5

8. Coordinate and ensure access to adjacent businesses/residents is maintained during encroachment permittee work.

9. Observe construction safety, public safety and convenience, and report discovered problems to City.

10. Monitor compliance with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits and requirements. Monitor compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

11. Upon completion of encroachment permittee work, conduct final inspection and close- out encroachment and construction/excavation permits.

P
rivate Land Development Projects
The C
onsultant shall provide first class work and services for providing construction management and inspection services of various improvements related to private land development projects, including, but not limited to: rough grading, street, sewer, water, storm drain, precise grading/paving, traffic signal, and traffic striping/signage. Appropriate inspection services shall be provided on review and approval of on- site and off -site improvements associated with private land development projects. The Consultant shall ensure all required improvements are constructed to appropriate standards and in accordance with the approved plans for the work. Coordination of materials testing and inspection services shall be provided (with all costs associated with materials testing/inspection paid for by the developer/owner).

The C
onsultant shall ensure approved Water Quality Management Plans (a “WQMP”) are implemented accordingly. The Consultant shall verify the developer/owner has obtained clearance under the Statewide General Permit, and has been issued a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID#). The Consultant shall also confirm that all construction activities within the City of Rialto conform to requirements identified in the City’s current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit. The Consultant shall review installation of all required storm water pollution control measures identified on the approved WQMP.

S
pecial Note: The Consultant will be required to obtain an office space within close proximity to City Hall, with part-time attendance by the assigned Inspector(s). Throughout the assignment, the Consultant shall be expected to be available to meet, as necessary, with City staff, including but not limited to, the Community Development Department to discuss assigned projects, review construction permits, and other requirements. Fees for time required to meet with City staff shall be included in the inspection fees charged by the Consultant, and shall not be separately paid for outside of required inspections.

I
t will be the responsibility of the successful firms and to determine the necessary staffing level required to perform the scope of service of each project assigned. The City will not provide dedicated work space or office space, City staff, or City resources, printing or copying services, or clerical assistance for the performance of this agreement.

A-6
All services shall be performed in compliance with the industry and professional standards and all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), current California Building Code, and the rules and ordinances of the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rialto.

The C
ity further reserves the right, when applicable and in the best interests of the City, to require the construction manager or inspector to engage sub-consultants with special expertise when the unique circumstances of a particular project warrants such additional services. The City may provide recommendations to the construction manager or inspector for consideration and reserves the right of approval of any sub- consultant selected by the construction manager or inspector on any project.

S
pecifically, Consultant shall provide those Services as outlined in its proposal dated March 17, 2022, included on the following pages.

Request for Proposal
RFP #22-048 - On-Call
Construction Management,
Inspection, and Materials
Testing Services
Submitted by:

PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co.

March 17, 2022

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services Table of Contents
Secti
on A:  Cover Letter  2
SECTION B:  FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE AND BACKGROUND  3

1. Firm  Profile 3

2. Firm  Principal 3

3. Relevant Experience  4

4. Organization Chart  9

5. Key Personnel 11

6. Subconsultants 21
SECTION C:  UNDERST
ANDING ON‐CALL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION AND   23 MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES

1. Project Work Plan and Methodology  23

1.A.  Task Order Approach  23

1.B.  Task Order Scope, Schedule, and Fee Development 23

1.C.  Managing and Delivering Task Orders 23

2. Defaulted/Terminated Projects  33
SECTION D:  REFERENCES AN
D EXPERIENCE  34

1. Example Project  34

2. Client References 35

3. List of On‐Call Contracts 35
SECTION E:  REQUI
RED FORMS (NOT INCLUDED IN THE PAGE COUNT)

1. Attachment  A – Signature Authorization

2. Attachment  B – Non‐collusion Affidavit

3. Attachment  C – Conflict Disclosure Form

4. Attachment  D – Debarment and Suspension Certification

5. Attachment  E – Non‐discrimination Certification

6. Attachment  F – Local Business Preference Form
SECTION F:  HOURL
Y RATE SCHEDULE (SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE FILE)

PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co.
125 Columbia, Suite A
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
949.600.8631  (t)  ●  949.335.4610 (f)
March 17, 2022
City of Rialto
150 S Palm Ave
Rialto, CA 92376
Re:  RFP #22‐048 ‐ On‐Call Construction Management, Inspection, and Materials Testing Services Dear Selection Committee:

PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co., Co would like to express our sincere desire to provide On‐Call Engineering Services to City of Rialto for Construction Management, Inspection, and Materials Testing. The PreScience Team’s goal is to provide highly qualified professionals that possess the qualifications and experience with dedication and track record in responsiveness and delivery of City’s upcoming on‐call assignments. This is where our team excels.

Providing consulting services to public agencies in California for infrastructure related projects has been the core of PreScience’s professional practice. Our ability to undertake the work in this solicitation is best demonstrated by our track record of successfully providing, on a consistent basis, highly‐qualified individuals in a timely manner for recent and current on‐call contracts for clients such as Caltrans and local government and transportation agencies. Our experience and reputation reveal the following seven key attributes that we consistently bring to our contracts, resulting in project excellence, staff competence, and successful delivery of services time after time:
 Commitment of our Project Manager, Jay Thakare, PE, who proactively seeks ways to improve, hence achieve ultimate quality services for our clients
 Peter Ho, PE as Project Principal, Elmo Delos Santos, PE and Jose Burbano, PE as the proposed Construction Managers/ Resident Engineers have managed more CM and inspection contracts than our competing colleagues  With our proven track record, Jay is by far the most responsive PM on similar contracts and has never been late in submitting progress reports or invoices
 An established strong working relationship with several local governments and Caltrans achieved by meeting and exceeding expectations on our past and current engagements  Strong and hands‐on CM/REs that are prepared to do “Whatever it Takes” professionally for the project success The credentials, resources, and commitment of the firm are important, but as important to successfully completing any engineering/construction project is choosing the right people with the right experience. Therefore, our individual key team members have been selected based on their relative levels of expertise in municipal infrastructure construction, reputation for quality work, and comprehensive understanding of the City, Caltrans, and local construction practices and processes.

Jay Thakare, PE, will serve as the primary point of contact. Jay’s contact information is as follows:
125 Columbia, Suite A, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
T: (805) 791‐6095; E: [email protected]
We thank the City for taking the time to review our qualifications and pledge the commitment of our team. We look forward to meeting with the City to further discuss our qualifications in the next phase of the selection process.

Very truly yours,
PreScience

Peter Ho, PE
Project Principal

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 3 |
SECTION B – Firm’s Qualifications, Experience, and Background

1. Firm Profile
PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co. (PSC) will serve as the Prime Consultant for this contract. PSC traces its lineage to Lim And Nascimento (LAN) Engineering founded in 1994. Peter Lim, PE; Peter Ho, PE; Elmo Delos Santos, PE; and Chuck Tran, PE were the founding principals of LAN Engineering Construction Services with core practice in highway/bridge and r ail/transit design, as well as construction management of highway/bridge and rail projects. Together, they successfully established LAN as one of the largest bridge/rail/transit construction engineering consulting firms in California with a solid reputation for working closely with owners and project stakeholders to successfully deliver projects with a high level of c ommunity  acceptance. At the time of the LAN/AECOM merger in 2009, the firm had more than 200 construction professionals.

In March 2011, the former LAN principals established PSC, a California corporation, following the same founding principle of placing the interests of our clients and the projects we serve above everyth
ing else. PSC firmly believes that people – not companies – deliver success projects. We therefore place the right people with the right experience, dedication, and proven track record on every project we undertake. We do not subscribe to the “big‐box store” business model prevalent in today’s A&E industry and do no t  fill boxes on an organization chart with unobtainable names. Instead, who you see is who you’ll get, meaning that the engineering professionals proposed for a project are those who will run it. Many of our engineers and inspectors have been working together since 1994. They bring work history ri ch  in the local transportation market and long‐standing relationships with utilities, local agencies, and contractors who have participated in the delivery of California’s most significant bridge, road, and transportation infrastructure projects that connect our cities today. Our clients, many of which were with us since 1994, include Caltrans (multiple contracts for Di stricts 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12), Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Alameda Corridor‐East Construction Authority (ACE), Metrolink/SCRRA, and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), as well as the Cities of Larkspur, Santa Fe Springs, La Mirada, and El Monte. PSC continues to grow and currently employs a staff of 53 employe es, with 22 registered California Professional Engineers. We are headquartered in Aliso Viejo and maintain branch offices in Oakland and Sacramento.

On Dec ember  29, 2021, PreScience Corporation’s majority share package was acquired by Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. and PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co., was incorporated in Delaware.

2. Firm Principal
As the company’s President, Peter Ho, PE, has the authority to bind PreScience to the terms of the contract and to allocate staffing resources for the duration of the contract.  Chuck will also serve as the contact person for the City during the evaluation process. Chuck’s contact information is as follows:

E‐Mail:  [email protected]
Phone:  323.855.1670 (M);  949.600‐8631 (O)
Fax:  949.335.4610
Address:  125 Columbia, Suite A
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Services:

Transportation Infrastructure
Project Management,
Construction Management,
Construction Engineering, and
Construction Inspection
Year Founded:
2011 (March)
Form of Organization:

Corporation
Main Office:
125 Columbia, Suite A
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Office: 949-600-8631
Fax: 949-335-4610
Branch Office:
8105 Edgewater Dr., Suite 102
Oakland, CA 94621
Office: 510-560-2483
Fax: 949-335-4610
855 Folsom Blvd., Ste #126
San Francisco, CA 94107
Office: 949-600-8631
Fax: 949-335-4610
1451 River Park Dr., Ste. 220
Sacramento, CA 95815
Office: 949-600-8631
Fax: 949-335-4610
Number of Employees:
84 PRESCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

4 |

3. Relevant Experience
PSC’s construction engineers specialize exclusively in providing full‐service construction management for transportation infrastructure projects and bring extensive experience in successfully delivering bridge, highway, and rail construction management projects in California. As a result, the PSC Team is thoroughly familiar with the challenges of working within Caltrans and local agency standards and procedures. We will bring this experience and the knowledge of the complexities of coordinating with utility companies, to complete the upcoming task orders on time and within budget.

PSC’s staff have successfully provided construction engineering and management services for similar construction projects in California. Relevant examples are provided in the matrix below. Some of the most notable projects with similar features that our staff have worked on are highlighted on the following pages.

Client, Project Name
Similar Key Project Elements
On‐Call Task Orders
Construction Management
Inspection Services
Multiple Agency Coordination
Utility Coordination
Working with Local Governments
RE Manual/Green Book/Caltrans
Local Assistance Procedures LAPM
New Infrastructure Construction
Infrastructure Renovation/
Modernization Projects
Cities of La Mirada and Santa Fe Springs On‐Call CM Services           OCPW Edinger Avenue Bridge Replacement           SGVCO /Durfee Avenue Grade Separation            Caltrans 07A5194 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection Services           Caltrans 59A1096 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection Services          

PRE‐CONSTRUCTION
∙ AAA Support
∙ Master Scheduling
∙ Cost Estimating
∙ Delivery Method Selection
∙ Permit Acquisition
∙ Right‐of‐Way Acquisition
∙ Value Engineering
∙ Contractor Pre‐qualification
∙ Design Consultant Oversight
∙ CM Manual Development

CONSTRUCTION
∙ Constructability Review
∙ Pre‐construction Survey
∙ Contract Administration
∙ Safety Monitoring
∙ Permit Compliance
∙ Office Engineering
∙ Submittal Review
∙ Engineering/Inspection
∙ Scheduling
∙ Change Management
∙ Utility Coordination
∙ Public Outreach
∙ Claim Resolution
∙ Labor Compliance
POST ‐ CONSTRUCTION
∙ Punch List
∙ Commissioning/Turnover
∙ Final Acceptance Walks
∙ Warranties /Guarantees
∙ Finalize As‐builts
∙ Project Close‐out
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 5 |
On‐Call Professional Services, La Mirada, CA
Contracting Agency: City of La Mirada
PreScience is providing construction management and inspection services for various public works improvement projects as part of the City of La Mirada Capital Improvement Plan. Projects include street widening, rehabilitation and improvements, grade separation, parking lot improvements, intersection and traffic signal improvements.

Construction management services include constructability reviews, contract administration, schedule de velopment  and review, coordination of contractors and consultants, plan and cost estimate review.

Inspection services include on‐site inspection of all work, traffic and utility coordination, SWPPP and permit compliance, materiuals quality assurance, monitoring construction in accordance with Green Book and Caltrans standards, coordination with SWRB, SCAQMD, SC Edison and other ju risdictional  agencies. Projects included:
 La Mirada Blvd. Corridor Traffic Signal Upgrades
 Alondra Blvd. at La Mirada Blvd. Intersection Improvement  Traffic Signal Improvements at La Mirada Blvd. and Rosecrans Ave. Intersection  Traffic Signal Improvements at Imperial Hwy. and Ocaso Ave. Intersection  Traffic Signal Upgrades at Various Intersections
 Traffic Signal Installation at Valley View Ave. and Adoree St. Intersection  Traffic Signal Installation at Artesia Blvd. and East Industry Cir. Intersection  Street Rehabilitation at I‐5, Valley View Ave., and Stage Rd.

Edinger Avenue Bridge Replacement, Huntington Beach, CA Contracting Agency: Orange County Public Works
PreScience provided construction management and inspection services to the County of Orange Public Works for the Edinger Avenue Bridge Replacement over Bolsa Chica Channel project. The County of Orange, in cooperation with Caltrans and FHWA, was replacing the Edinger Avenue Bridge located on the border of Huntington Beach and Seal Beach. Th e  existing 15‐pile span timber bridge was removed and replaced with a 4‐pile span precast concrete bridge. The replacement bridge is approximately 5.9 feet higher than the existing bridge to provide clearance for projected flood water elevations in the Bolsa Chica Channel. The length of the bridge span increased from app roximately 300 feet to 340 feet across Bolsa Chica Channel to accommodate the higher bridge profile.

Portions of the Bolsa Chica Channel banks were reconstructed and modified with rock slope protection to protect slopes, fill scour holes and to provide scour protection at the bridge abutments. Riprap was installed a pproximately  50 feet upstream and downstream of the bridge on both sides of the channel.

A drainage inlet was added near the existing bridge on the west side and drainage improvements were provided at the Countess Drive/Edinger Avenue intersection.

Countess Drive, a local street was improved and reprofiled to match the ne w  Edinger Avenue. The scope of work also included various additional improvements to local streets.

Project Information
Key Personnel
Elmo Delos Santos, PE; Mark
Guillen; Norie Corpuz, PE; Michael
Nguyen, EIT
Construction Cost/Contract Amount
$16 M / $2 M
Contract Date/Year Completed
2017 / 2019
Funding Source
Local / Federal
Project Information
Key Personnel
Elmo Delos Santos, PE; Mark
Guillen; Norie Corpuz, PE; Michael
Nguyen, EIT; Solomon Choi, PE
*Jose Burbano, PE (did not work on
this on‐call, but has worked with
City La Mirada)
Construction Cost/Contract Amount
Various / $1 M
Contract Date/Year Completed
2017 / 2022
Funding Source
Local

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

6 |
Durfee Avenue Grade Separation, Pico Rivera, CA
Contracting Agency: SGVCOG
PreScience is providing full construction management services as Prime consultant for the construction of the Durfee Avenue Grade Separation Project. The project will grade separate the roadway and the railroad tracks on Durfee Avenue in the City of Pico Rivera.

Plans call for constructing a roadway underpass on Durfee Avenue, between Beverly Road and Whitier Boulevard, under the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, with retaining walls and a new railroad bridge. Scope of services includes contract QA and safety compliance, construction inspection and engineering, construction administration, project scheduling, contract dispute assistance, change order management, environmental and storm water monitoring, and QA construction staking, and coordination with other entities. One of the main concerns is maintaining continuous traffic, bicycle, and pedestrian flow through and around the local community, as well as, coordinating local street detours while maintaining residence and business access. Close coordination and continuous communication with UPRR is maintained to ensure compliance with railroad safety requirements and uninterrupted service. PreScience is also working in close coordination with ACE Public Relations Group to mitigate impact of full road closures and detours during construction.

Project successes include:
 PreScience’s efficient construction management approach, particularly in allocating and managing project resources based on construction schedule, has resulted in a savings of 4,500 manhours, in the project’s first phase  PreScience worked collaboratively with the Contractor to mitigate 30 weeks of cutover delay caused by Southern California Edison, by resequencing the schedule and planning ahead

Caltrans Contract No. 07A5194, Los Angeles County, CA
Contracting Agency: Caltrans District 7
PreScience is providing construction management, inspection, and Critical Path Method analyses, as well as construction oversight services to Caltrans and Metro on I‐5 HOV and Truck Lanes and ADA Curb Ramp Improvements projects in Los Angeles County.

The scope of work for these two task orders will include providing qualified staff with a
wide range of experience in freeway and highway construction to work on various elements of both projects. PreScience will monitor the construction activities and provide construction inspection for compliance with plans and specifications.  PreScience staff will assist in analyzing the construction details and make recommendations and decisions on construction issues including CCO, progress payments, and coordination of plant inspection. PreScience will also provide experienced schedulers to perform CPM analyses to keep projects on schedule. Personnel augmented to Caltrans will include construction inspectors for roadway work, office engineers, assistants to Caltrans Resident Engineers responsible for construction administration, CPM schedulers, and landscape inspectors.

Project Information
Key Personnel
Jose Burbano, PE, Elmo Delos Santos,
PE; Mark Guillen; Norie Corpuz, PE;
Michael Nguyen, EIT; Reginald
Agunwah, EIT; Hamid Boroomand
Construction Cost/Contract Amount
$250 M / $7 M
Contract Date/Year Completed
2022 / 2026
Funding Source
Local / State
Project Information
Key Personnel
Peter Ho, PE; Solomon Choi, PE,
Elmo Delos Santos, PE; Norie Corpuz,
PE
Construction Cost/Contract Amount
$44 M / $6 M
Contract Date/Year Completed
2019 / 2022
Funding Source
Local / Federal

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 7 |
Caltrans Office of Structure Construction (OSC) Contract No. 59A1110: On‐Call Structure Construction Engineering and Inspection; District 7 and 12, Southern CA Contracting Agency: Caltrans OSC
PreScience as the single Prime consultant is provided construction administration, construction engineering and inspection (E&I) for various projects within the region of Caltrans District 7 and 12 (LA, Orange and Ventura counties) under contract 59A1110.

PreScience personnel are performing duties in various roles including assistant resident engineers and field inspectors PreScience and it s  subconsultant team personnel are performing engineering and inspection duties in various roles including structure representative, field lead/principal assistant, assistant structure representative (Range D) and construction inspector (Range A/B/C/TETs), for a wide variety structure construction and performing engineering and inspection for wide variety of elements including:
• CIP PT box gi rders • Falsework
• CIDH/Driven Piling • MSE, Retaining Walls
• Building Construction • Joint Seals
• PC‐PS girders • Bridge Removal
• Soundwalls • M‐crylate, Poly.Concrete
• Approach slabs • Sign Structures
PreScience personnel are implementing their knowledge of Caltrans standard plans and specifications and manuals (including but no t  limited to Bridge Construction Records and Procedures, Falsework Manual, Foundation Manual, Safety Manual, Construction Manual) to review submittals, assist in contract administration, perform inspection and submit deliverables.

Partial list of projects includes:
07‐301104   Route 60‐710 Approach
07‐2159U4   Widen Freeway by adding one mixed flow lane 07‐303704   LA‐101 Median B arrier Upgrade
07‐311703   LA‐134 Pavement Preservation
07‐1218W3   LA‐005 Major Widening
12‐0K0224   ORA – 005 ‐ Add Lanes
12‐0S2004   ORA – 57/22 HM3 Bridge Rehabilitation
12‐0Q3104   ORA – 91 – Knott Ave Undercrossing
Project Information
Key Personnel
Jay Thakare, PE; Elmo Delos Santos,
PE; Jose Burbano, PE; Reginald
Agunwah, EIT; Hamid Boroomand
Construction Cost/Contract Amount
$150 M / $22 M
Contract Date/Year Completed
2020 / 2024
Funding Source
State / Federal

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

8 |
THE PRESCIENCE DIFFERENCE

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

9 |

4. Organization Chart
While its essential for a firm to have credentials and resources, assigning the right personnel at the right time to match project needs is critical. To successfully provide staff for multiple contracts simultaneously, we implement ‘Best Practices’ for project assignments, an example of which is the PreScience Staffing Plan. It incorporates and tracks the assignment and availability of every employee in the company and also includes a list of upcoming staff needs. Our primary focus for this project will be staffing stability —  the ability to identify, deploy and maintain key as well as supporting staff as‐needed throughout the project lifecycle. To identify the most qualified personnel and determine their level of engagement for the on‐call contract, we developed an understanding of the project needs, scope, and its objectives. This enabled us to not only select the most qualified individuals for key personnel roles on the project, but also ensure depth and adequacy of support and as‐needed staff.

Utilizing the information made available by the City and our experience from recently completed or ongoing relevant projects, we developed a conceptual construction schedule. To assess resource demands, we prepared a Staffing Plan corresponding to the construction schedule. Based on a combination of PreScience’s Staffing Plan, the list of available subconsultant personnel and the project staffing plan, we identified individuals with sound educational background, job‐specific skillset, track record of relevant experience and most importantly their availability , to develop the Organization Chart.

This methodical approach of matching resources with project needs will ensure staffing stability, provide alternatives for incidental support staff replacement and result in continuity and high‐ quality services.

The versatile and efficient PreScience team, is comprised of cross‐trained, multi‐tasking individuals committed to accomplish project goals and committed for its entire duration. By staffing strategically and leveraging the versatile expertise of the personnel proposed, our objective is to reduce CM costs. As an example, our proposed construction manager Jose Burbano, PE, QSD, in addition to being a construction manager, has a strong structure construction background and is capable of performing Structure Representative duties, whereas moist of the proposed construction inspectors have assistant resident engineering experience, can perform office engineering as well as structure construction, civil, and traffic inspection.

Key Staff Availability ‐ Individual Availability Within First 12 Months and Beyond Name  Firm  Project Function  % Availability
0‐3
Months
3‐6
Months
6‐9
Months
9‐12
Months
Beyond
12 Months
Jay Thakare, PE  PSC  Project Manager  75  75  75  75  100 Elmo Delos Santos, PE  PSC  CM/RE  75  100  100  100  100 Jose Burbano, PE  PSC  CM/RE  100  100  100  100  100
Mark Guillen  PSC  Civil Inspector  100  100  100  100  100 Reginald Agunwah, EIT  PSC  Civil Inspector  100  100  100  100  100 Masoud Khoshnevis  PSC  Structure Inspector  100  100  100  100  100 Francisco Villasenor  PSC  Office Engineer  100  100  100  100  100 Steven Brown  DES  Structure Representative  100  100  100  100  100 Lonnie Partch  BV  Building/Permit Inspector  100  100  100  100  100 Steve Skeffington  BV  Building/Permit Inspector  100  100  100  100  100 Zachariah Roush  AVS  Materials Tester  100  100  100  100  100

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 10 |

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 11 |

5. Key Personnel
Firms do not deliver projects, people do. By studying which staff would provide the City the greatest value, PSC assembled the firms which have the right people with the right knowledge, experience and mindset to provide the capabilities needed for this contract.

Dhananjay (Jay) Thakare, PE
Project Manager / Lead Representative
Jay Thakare has over 20 years of experience (including six‐year tenure with Caltrans) in the civil infrastructure industry primarily comprised of construction management of highway, bridge, railroad and transit facility projects. In current role as Area Manager for the Southern California region, he is providing operational oversight for staff and pr ojects  and actively engaged in business development pursuits. Tasks include project/contract management for on‐call, staff augmentation as well as full construction management service contracts for state and local agencies including Caltrans, various Cities and SANDAG. Jay has a proven track record as Senior Project Manager & Resident Engineer performing contract admi nistration, constructability reviews, field engineering, estimating, quality assurance inspection, surveying, scheduling, coordination with stakeholder agencies and utility companies, public outreach, contract change orders, dispute resolution and claim support.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
On‐Call Structure Construction Engineering and Inspection Contract 59A0761, 59A0939, and 59A1110, Los Angeles, Ventura and Orange Counties, CA. Contract/Project Manager. Duties included primary responsibility for all matters related to Consultant (and sub‐consultant) personnel, safety and operations including Staffing, Training, Quality Assurance of Deliverables, Task Order Scope, Schedule and Budget Management and Invoicing. Key projects included Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement, Schuyler Heim Bridge Replacement, and I‐5 (N & S Cor ridor  Improvements).

On‐Call Construction Management Support Services Contracts 5001071 and 5007800 (Prime) and Mid‐Coast LRT CM Services Contract, San Diego, CA. Contract/Project Manager. Duties included primary responsibility for all matters related to Consultant (and sub‐consultant) personnel, safety and operations including Staffing, Training, Quality Assurance of Deliverables, Task Order Scope, Schedule and Budget Management and Invoicing. Key projects included North Coast Corridor Program (Rail Segments) and Mid‐Coast Light Rail Transit (San Diego Riv er  Bridge & Elvira ‐ Morena Double Tracks).

Rancho Mission Viejo, Ortega Highway, Orange County, CA. Resident Engineer/Structure Representative. As Structure Representative and subsequently Resident Engineer for project close‐out, duties included contract administration and construction management; review of submittals for temporary and permanent structural installations; review of concrete mix designs; claims resolution and drafting contract change orders; monthly progress payment estimation; business correspondence, book‐keeping per Cal trans  and Federal standards. Field duties included: inspection of CISS and driven piles, structural inspection for sub‐structural and super‐structural reinforced concrete members, falsework, pre‐cast prestressed girders; retaining wall construction, bridge demo inspection; rebar and concrete placement inspection; surveying and grade alignment; sampling of material for quality assurance. Project con sisted  of construction of new bridge over San Juan Creek, widening of highway from 2‐lanes to 4‐lanes, intersection improvements, mass grading, installation of traffic signals, utilities and facilities.

Highway 118 Widening, Simi Valley, CA. Structure Representative. Office duties included contract administration; submittals review; concrete mix designs review; claims resolution and drafting contract change orders; monthly progress payment estimation. Field duties included inspection of drilled and driven piles, structural inspection for sub‐structural and super‐ structural reinforced concrete members, falsework, pre‐cast pre‐stressed girders; sound wa ll  construction, bridge demo inspection; sign structure construction; rebar/concrete placement inspection; grade alignment; QA material sampling.

Reconstruction of Santa Clara River Bridge, Ventura, CA. Structure Representative. Office duties included review of submittals for temporary and permanent structural installations; review of concrete mix designs; monthly progress payment estimation; book‐keeping per Caltrans and Federal standards, assisting in claims resolution and drafting contract change orders. Field responsibilities included inspection of 120’deep 12’ dia. Cast‐in‐Steel‐Shell p ile  foundations in difficult river‐bed geological conditions, inspection of sub‐structural and super‐structural reinforced concrete members, post‐ tensioning, falsework analysis, surveying and bridge column and deck grades, material sampling and testing. Project consisted of 12‐lane, 3‐phase bridge replacement project across the Santa Clara River.

Experience
Years with Firm: 3
Total Years: 20
Education
MS, Civil
Engineering
BE, Civil Engineering
Registrations
PE, CA No. C70020
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 12 |
Elmo Delos Santos, PE
Construction Manager / Resident Engineer
Elmo Delos Santos has more than 34 years of experience, leadership, and supervision in engineering and construction.

He has worked as a Project Manager/Construction Manager/Resident Engineer on various rail/bridge/highway projects for local transportation agencies, cities, and counties. Over the last 20 years, he has primarily worked on grade separation and rail re lated  projects for ACE, ACTA, POLA, Metrolink, and other agencies that involved UPRR, BNSF, PHL, and ACTA tracks.  Additionally, he has worked on several Caltrans bridge projects throughout California.  He is an expert in all areas of contract administration, construction management, document control, schedule control, cost control, design and constructability reviews, qu ality  control and quality assurance, construction inspection, claims mitigation, claims analysis, contract change order processing, and construction office management. Elmo developed the first Resident Engineer Manual for the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority that is currently used.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
On Call Project/Construction Management and Inspection Services for City of Santa Fe Springs, CA. Sr. Project Manager / Construction Manager. On call project/construction management consultant to provide full‐service construction management services for the City of Santa Fe Springs Facilities and Roadway Rehabilitation (Santa Fe Springs Road, Greenstone Avenue, Florence Avenue, Los Nietos Road and Town Center Plaza Parking Lot). Project items of work in cluded parking lot improvements, facilities improvements, cement treated base, RCC “roller compacted concrete, asphalt paving, rubberized asphalt paving, slurry seal, traffic striping paint & thermoplastic, concrete walks and ADA ramps, cross‐gutters, catch basin wing gates, temporary traffic control, etc.  Also, assist the city engineering staff with providing pre‐bid, pre‐ co
nstruction constructability review and value engineering. Duties include all aspects of project construction management that entail conducting meeting, responding to RFIs and Submittals, change orders, progress payments, testing management, records administration, scheduling and claims.

On‐Call Engineering Services, La Mirada, CA. Assistant Resident Engineer/Lead Construction Inspector. Prescience provided construction ma nagement  and inspection services for various CIP transportation infrastructure improvement projects as part of the City of La Mirada Capital Improvement Plan. The projects ranged from street rehabilitation, intersection improvements, traffic signal installation and street lighting improvements. Our project staff has been responsible for development and review of schedules, coordination with mul tiple  consultants and agencies, performing plan checks of construction documents, reviewing contractor invoices, and coordinating with utilities.

Edinger Avenue Bridge Replacement over Bolsa Chica Channel, Huntington Beach/Seal Beach, CA. Resident Engineer.

PreScience provided construction management and inspection services to the County of Orange Public Works. Scope of work included construction of a ne w  bridge, temporary bridge and demolition of the existing bridge, as well as numerous environmental mitigations associated with working in a waterway and improvements to the connecting roadways and local streets. As Resident Engineer, Elmo’s responsibilities include construction management for all phases during pre‐bid, preconstruction (constructability review and value engineering), con struction, and post construction that entail document control (RFIs and submittals), change/costs management, payments, schedule analysis, claims analysis, on‐site QA inspections, QA material testing, QA surveying, utility coordination, coordination with Caltrans and FHWA, coordination with Cities of Huntington Beach and Seal Beach, environmental monitoring, labor compliance support, publ ic  outreach.

Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo Metrolink Station Improvement, Laguna Niguel, CA. Resident Engineer/CM Contract Project Manager. Elmo was responsible for construction management services for all phases during pre‐bid, preconstruction (constructability review and value engineering), construction and post construction that entail document control, change/costs management, payments, schedule analysis, claims analysis, on‐site QA in spections, QA material testing, QA surveying, coordination with project stakeholders, environmental monitoring, labor compliance support and public outreach support.  PreScience provided full‐service Construction Management for the Laguna Niguel / Mission Viejo Metrolink Station Improvement.  Significant project elements included parking lot paving and striping, new ADA ramps connecting trai n  platforms through tunnel, cross walks from parking lots, pedestrian canopy, upgrade station lighting, electrical and mechanical equipment, restrooms and utilities relocations.

Experience
Years with Firm: 8
Total Years: 34
Education
MS, Civil
Engineering
BS, Civil Engineering
Registrations
PE, CA No: 48975
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 13 |
Jose Burbano, PE, QSD/P
Construction Manager / Resident Engineer
Jose Burbano has over 24 years of Construction Management and Engineering experience as a Senior Construction Manager, Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Structures, Principal Assistant, Utility Coordinator & Safety Officer for various Federally funded Public Works projects including new and rehabilitation construction of freeways, highways, interchanges, grade separation, intersections, and pedestrian bridges. Ext ensive  experience in the application of Caltrans policies and procedures, administering federally funded projects per LAPM 2020, encroachment permits, material testing coordination, submittal reviews, RFI’s, extensive constructability reviews, utility / Flood Control and railroad coordination for BNSF & UPRR, scheduling with local agencies, public awareness, contractor scheduling and documentation. He also ha s  experience interpreting plans, specifications, special provisions, and other contract documents as well as identifying potential problems and proposing effective solutions.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
166th Street Rehabilitation, Cerritos, CA. Resident Engineer/Project Manager. The 166th Street Rehabilitation project included cold planning the existing street three (3) inches of asphalt, constructing 3/8‐inch le veling  courses at areas where the roadbed structural section failed, provided AC overlay; removal and replacement of deficient concrete curb & gutters, sidewalks panels and ADA wheelchair access ramps per newest Caltrans standards; adjustment of utilities to grade; crack seal of existing pavement, remove and reconstruct of median stamped concrete, and re‐s triping  of lane lines and stop bars at various major intersections. Jose assisted the City with State reimbursement and managed the project per Local Assistance Procedures Manual. The project was audited by the State and passed with flying colors.

I‐5 / Valley View Avenue Interchange, Caltrans District 7, La Mirada, CA. Assistant Resident Engineer.  The Valley View Avenue Interchange project adds a High Occupancy Vehicle and mixed‐flow lane in each direction along approximately one and a half miles of I‐5. The project extends through the cities of Buena Park, La Mirada, Cerritos, and Santa Fe Springs. Provided sub‐structure and su per ‐structure improvements to the interchange at Valley View Avenue and adjacent frontage roads. The new bridge included a UPRR railroad overpass. As lead on this project, Jose was responsible leading critical operations, such as major SCE vaults and pole relocations, sub‐structure drainage improvements, 24 inch sewer by‐pass, 92 hour c onsecutive  major street closure, live f/o utility relocations that required day and night supervision. As a lead, Jose assisted in SWPPP and BMP reviews, traffic control and MUTCD implementation, Cal OSHA inspection, conducted safety meetings, and environmental compliance.  The I‐5 project involves extensive traffic control for city streets and th e  state highway; coordinated with the construction of a new Caltrans Maintenance building facility; curb, gutter , ADA ramps, and sidewalks; sound and retaining walls; street rehabilitation, traffic signalization; and sewer and water line improvements.

Stewart Street Underpass Grade Separation, Loma Linda, California Project Manager & Structures Engineer. The underpass low ered the existing profile grade of Stewart Street by approximately 16 feet to provide clearance from the finished surface of the roadway to the bottom of the bridge. The project consisted of large excavation, retained by 132 soldier pile wall system with tie backs and 24‐inch drilled holes reinforced wi th  steel spiral cages, timber lagging used for temporary shoring, 9 cantilever retaining walls constructed with spread footings. The bridge spanned the entire roadbed; supported by 18 ‐ 36‐inch diameter CIDH embedded 56 feet deep into the ground. Project also required the relocation of existing utilities such as Verizon overhead lines, Ga s main, 2 water lines, relocation of existing sewer lines, tunnel drains, to name a few.

Gene Autry Way Interchange Improvement, Anaheim, California Lead Structures & Roadway. Gene Autry Way intersects Interstate 5 in central Orange County, project provided direct access to the I‐5 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) ramps wi th  new roadway through existing mobile home park, the work consisted of cast‐in‐place post‐tensioned girder bridge, retaining walls, pre‐cast sound walls with sound sorb, sewer relocation, mechanical stabilized embankment (MSE) wall, Traffic signalization, street lighting, landscaping and utility improvements. Provided services including peer review plan checking; contract admi nistration and assisted with the relocation of utilities, such as Southern California Edison, Anaheim Electric, So Cal Gas, Time Warner, Q‐West, AT&T and Telecom Communication.

Experience
Years with Firm: 1
Total Years: 24
Education
BS, Civil Engineering
Registration
PE, CA No.C91031
Professional
Memberships:

American Society of
Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
Awards/Honors:

Best Improved
Infrastructure
Project of the Year
2010
ASCE Region 9
award the SR22
project “2007
Project of the Year”
Calif Transportation
Foundation (CTF)
Award:

Freeway/Expres
swa
y Project of the Year
2016
CTM Certifications:
125, 533, 539, 540
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

14 |
Mark Guillen, CESSWI, PCI II, ACI I
Civil/Roadway Construction Inspector
Mark has over 34 years of construction experience and has dedicated more than 10 years to freeway/highway construction management and inspection. His broad‐based experience includes heavy construction applications with demonstrated expertise in construction, highway inspections, traffic control, landscaping and utilities. He is a multi‐skilled construction inspector with experiences in Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP) issues, environmental requirements, cost estimates and quality control/quality assurance. He also formerly held a State Contractor’s General “B” License. Entities and types of projects include:
 City of Rialto – park development and landscape maintenance districts  City of Ontario – roadway, waterline, and bridge
 City of Fontana – roadway & community facilities district development and parks  San Bernardino Association of Governments – freeway lane addition and landscaping  Jurupa Community Services District – sewer lines, water lines, sewer pump stations, and parks  Riverside County EDA – roadway and beautification projects  Riverside County Flood Control – channel and streambed mitigation plantings  City Santa Fe Springs– CIP roadways, parking lots, traffic signals, site lighting, landscaping, permits  La Mirada & Santa Fe Springs– grade separation RR bridge, roadway, landscaping, and traffic signals  Caltrans – highway, bridges, traffic signals/lighting, landscaping, riverbed mitigation revegetation  Orange County Transportation Authority – freeway, grade separation and toll road

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
On Call Inspection Services for City of Santa Fe Springs, CA. Construction Inspector. On call inspection consultant to provide full‐service construction management services for the City of Santa Fe Springs Roadway Rehabilitation Projects.

The city has assigned multiple roadway rehabilitation projects throughout Santa Fe Springs. Project items of work included:
cement treated base, RCC “roller compacted concrete, asphalt paving, rubberized asphalt paving, slurry seal, traffic striping paint & thermoplastic, concrete walks and ADA ramps, cross‐gutters, catch basin wing gates, temporary traffic control, etc.  Duties include quantity calculations for progress and final payments, coordinate on‐site QA testing, communicate with businesses and homeowners affected by roadwork, maintain project as‐builts, etc.

On-Call Traffic Signal Improvements, La Mirada, CA. Civil/Landscape Inspector. The project consists of various intersections traffic signal installations and modifications, sidewalk handicap ramps modification to meet ADA requirements and paving and striping for roadway rehabilitations. Mark is responsible for the inspection improvements and roadway/street rehabilitations at various locations. Projects consist of traffic signal improvements, concrete sidewalk installation, roadway paving and striping improvements at Imperial Highway and Ocaso, Imperial Highway and Santa Gertrudes, La Mirada Avenue and Rosecrans, and Valley View Avenue and Adoree intersections.

Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo Metrolink Station Improvement, Laguna Niguel, CA. Assistant Resident Engineer/Construction Inspector. Significant project elements included parking lot paving and striping, install new ADA ramps connection train platforms through tunnel, cross walks from parking lots, pedestrian canopy, upgrade station lighting, electrical and mechanical equipment, restrooms, and utilities relocations. Mark was responsible for assisting the Resident Engineer and providing construction inspection services during pre‐bid, pre‐construction (constructability review and value engineering), construction, and post construction that entail document control, change/costs management, payments, schedule analysis, claims analysis, on‐site QA inspections, and coordination with project stakeholders.

Alton Parkway Extension, Irvine, CA. Construction Inspector. Construction of Alton Parkway and utility relocations.

Provided Fair Cost Estimate for adding video detection system to traffic signal systems. Provided inspections for roadbed subgrade, bus turnouts, local depressions for catch basins, median curbing, traffic signal pole foundations, utility conduit encasements, reclaim water irrigation installations, and retaining walls. Also provided inspection of sewer lateral installations and sewer manhole work and traffic control.

Experience
Years with Firm: 6
Total Years: 34

Education
BS‐Ornamental
Horticulture
Construction
Management
Certificate and
Technical Certificate

Registrations
ISA Certified
Arborist, #WE‐
9149A
CTM 547 Caltrans
Certified – Bridge
Profilograph
Certified Erosion,
Sediment and Storm
Water Inspector,
#3127
PCI Level I and II,
#14597
ACI Concrete Field
Testing Technician –
Grade I
SCRRA/Metrolink –
Trained:  MOWORI,
Watchman/
Lookout, Roadway
Machine Operator,
Employee In
Charge/Lone
Worker, & Adjacent
Track
SCRRA/Metrolink –
Qualified:  FRA
213.119 Continuous
Welded Rail
FRA –Qualified:  FRA
213 – Track Safety
Standards Subpart A
to F Track
Inspection
UPRR Safety –
Contractor
Orientation Course
National Plant
Diagnostic Network
– First Detector
Training Certified
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 15 |
Reginald Agunwah, EIT
Civil/Roadway Construction Inspector
Reginald has over 35 years of technical engineering and construction experience in civil engineering and field construction.

Reginald has been responsible for estimating, construction inspection, construction management, and project coordination with designers, contractors, and employees, field management of employees, equipment and subcontractors.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE:

Caltrans District7 As Needed CM/CEI: Construction on St ate  Highway in Los Angeles County in Los Angeles and at Castaic from 0.2 mile south of Route 5/14 separation to 0.7 mile north of Polomas Wash Bridge, CA. Assistant Resident Engineer/Construction Inspector. This construction project consisted of paving of jointed plane concrete pavement, jointed plane concrete pavement – RSC, precast con crete  pavement and asphalt paving. As an Assistant Resident Engineer inspecting the constructions of various items of work, Reggie’s duties included traffic control 1097 and 1098 in compliance with MUTCD and specifications, storm water pollution monitoring and prevention, temporary inlet protection, temporary fiber roll, temporary traffic stripe (paint),temporary pavement marking(Paint), tempora ry  railing (Type K), temporary crash cushion, removal of yellow thermoplastic stripe (hazardous waste), repair spalled surface area, removal of guardrail, treated wood waste, Remove thermoplastic  traffic stripe, removal of thermoplastic pavement marking, removal of pavement marker, removal of asphalt concrete dike, removal of concrete pavement, cold plane asphalt concrete pavement, roa dway excavation, geosynthetic reinforcement, class 3 aggregate base ,alternative treated bas, lean concrete base‐RSC, base bond breaker, hot mix asphalt paving, rubberizes hot mix asphalt (Gape graded), placement of hot mix asphalt dikes, jointed plane concrete pavement, jointed plane concrete pavement – RSC, drill and bond (dowel bar), individual sla b  replacement(RSC), individual precast slab replacement (IPSR), isolation joint seal(preformed), minor concrete minor structures, mid‐west guardrail system wood post, including transitional railing (type Wb‐31), end cap (type A), end anchor assembly (type SFT) alternative in line and alternative flared systems. Work also included installation of thermoplastic stripe and markings, pavemen t markers retroreflective, adjust inlets to grade, remove concrete barrier, concrete barrier type 60F and type 60, profile grade new pavement, preparation of daily construction activities reports, monitoring of change orders under T & M, monitoring of safety related issues and Daily Quantity Estimates, and preparation of monthly construction estimates for pa yment  to the contractor.

Caltrans District 7 As Needed CM/CEI: Construction on State Highway in Los Angeles County from Route 101/134/170 Separation to 0.8 miles north of Kanan road Overcrossing, CA. Assistant Resident Engineer/Construction Inspector. This project consists of roadway infrastructure upgrades at various locations. As an assistant Resident Engineer, Reggie in
spected the constructions of various items of work that included traffic control, guardrail removal, asphalt concrete dikes removal, roadway excavation, concrete asphalt surfacing, vegetation control, concrete barrier, and thermoplastic pavement markings. Also assisted with documentation of daily construction activities, change order monitoring and documentation, SWPPP inspections and compliance, and labor com pliance  interviews. Prepared monthly construction estimates for payment to the contractor.

State Route 91 Widening, Orange County, CA. Assistant Resident Engineer. This project included widening of west bound Route 91, addition of one lane, widening six bridges and construction of seven retaining walls. Reggie inspected SWPPP, construction area signs traffic con trol  systems and detour, temporary pavement markers, temporary crash cushion module, irrigation facility. soundwall, retaining walls, concrete barrier railing, concrete channel, cold plane asphalt concrete pavement, roadway excavations, roadway structural sections various type, aggregate bases, lean concrete bases, lean concrete rapid setting, asphalt treated permeable base, cement treated permeable base, pre pa ving  Profilograph and pre paving grinding for smoothness, hot mix asphalt, rubber asphalt, jointed plane concrete pavement (JPCP). concrete barriers thermoplastic striping, paint traffic stripes. Also provided inspections of all electrical systems which included lighting stage construction changeable message sign systems, traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit television system, ramp metering sys tems,  and communication systems. Daily construction activities included reports, change order monitoring and documentations, project wide weekly safety reviews and follow ups, monthly pay estimate calculations to contractor.

Experience
Years with Firm: 3
Total Years: 35
Education
BS, Civil Engineering
Registrations
EIT, CA #XE073805
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

16 |
Masoud Khoshnevis
Structure Construction Inspector
Masoud Khoshnevis has over 21 years of extensive, strong, and diverse construction oversight experience in all phases of onsite and offsite operations encompassing roadway excavation, utility relocation, utility coordination, landscaping, hardscaping, new roadway/bridge inspection, roadway /pavement rehabilitation and maintenance, highway construction, JPCP construction, slab replacement, AC pavement rehabilitation (grinding & overlay), freeway closures, irrigation, material testing, observation of  mass grading, installation of sewer, water and storm drains; drainage inlets, installation of curb and gutter, street paving, roadway widening, roadway closure, day/night work, retaining walls, perimeter walls, ADA compliant sidewalks, driveways, perimeter landscaping, park work, utility relocations, project safety and dust control. Masoud has strong geotechnical testing and inspections background in concrete, asphalt, and reinforcement steel.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
On‐Call Structure Construction Engineering and Inspection Services in Districts 6 and 10, Caltrans, Central CA. Structure Construction Inspector. Project duties include Observation, Testing and Inspection of Methacrylate bridge deck treatment.

PreScience is providing structure construction inspection services to Caltrans for bridge upgrades, replacements, and repairs construction projects in Central California Districts 6 and 10.  Project EAs include: EA#05‐0N72U4, EA#06‐0Q9104, and EA#06‐360244.

SR‐60/Potrero Avenue Interchange, Beaumont, CA. Construction Inspector. SR‐60/Potrero includes constructing a new overcrossing bridge over SR‐60, the widening and re‐alignment of Potrero and Western Knolls, and the addition of acceleration/deceleration lanes from Western Knolls to the SR‐60 WB. Work consisted of new CIPPS Box Girder bridge and roadway widening including constructing new JPCP pavement, reconstruct sections of AC pavement roads along Potrero and Western knolls, constructing new JPCP pavement along WB‐SR‐60 and AC pavement widening and shoulders. Masoud was responsible for inspection of permanent erosion control, landscaping/hardscaping, grading, traffic control and concrete pours. He prepared and verified field measurements for payment, monitored and verified extra work invoices, coordinated field testing and sampling.

Caltrans HOV Lanes and Mix Flow Lanes, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, CA. Construction Inspector. Mr. Khoshnevis duties included supervising field inspectors, coordination with multiple utility agencies to avoid project delays, reviewing submittals, falsework calculations, attend weekly meetings and report on on‐going work, assisted with change order and resolved daily construction issues, monitored various project sites for safety conformance, pile driving, prepared block wall profile and verified wall layout, generated grades for new bridges and bridge widening, reviewed falsework and shoring for various structures.

County of Los Angeles On‐Call Contract: Westmont Community Bikeway Access Improvement, South Los Angeles, CA.

Construction Inspector.  Construction of asphalt concrete pavement on a base material, curb & gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, and cross gutter and installation of striping, signing, and pavement marking and the performance of other appurtenant works in the unincorporated area. Responsibilities included inspecting the erection of falsework, reinforcement, concrete placement, JPCP slab replacement, new AC paving, AC pavement grinding & overlaying, pavement replacement. He prepared and verified field measurements for payment, monitored and verified extra work invoices, recommendation of change orders and RFIs, coordinated field testing and sampling.

I‐15/Limonite Interchange, Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley, CA. Construction Inspector. Project involved reconstruction of the existing diamond interchange to a partial cloverleaf interchange with spread diamond ramps, loop entrance ramps, and new overcrossing at Interstate 15 and Limonite Avenue. The proposed improvements are new masonry block soundwall supported on CIDH piles with pile cap, demolish the existing bridge and replace with a new bridge, widening of Limonite Avenue, the addition of auxiliary lanes on I‐15 prior to and after tie on and off ramps, drainage, lighting and sign improvements, ramp metering on all on‐ramps, signal modifications, relocation of various utilities, and Class II bike lanes. Masoud was responsible for extensive utility coordination with various agencies, inspection of all field activities including daily field inspection/ coordinating activities with the contractor for all construction stages including, landscaping, hardscaping, irrigation, soundwall, CIDH piling, stem & soffit, deck pours and other reinforced concrete structures, joint sealing, HMA operations and traffic control.

Experience
Years with Firm: 1
Total Years: 21

Education
Deutscher
Angestelle
Akademie (DAA)
Siegen, Germany
Associate of Arts
(AA) ‐ Construction
Economy

Registrations
40‐hour Hazardous
Waste Operations
(HAZWOPER)
Health and Safety
Certification
Completed courses:

Caltrans District 7
Construction Safety,
BNSF Railroad
Safety, Amtrak
Safety and UPRR
Safety
Grade I‐Concrete
Field‐Testing
Technician ‐ ACI
International
Caltrans
Certifications for CT‐
105, CT‐125 AGG,
CT‐201, CT‐202, CT‐
205, CT‐216, CT‐
217, CT‐226, CT‐
227, CT‐229, CT‐
504, CT‐518, CT‐
539, CT‐540, CT‐
543, CT‐556 and CT‐
557
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

17 |
Francisco Villasenor
Office Engineer
Francisco Villasenor is an experienced Project Manager/Engineer with a strong knowledge of civil projects in construction and coordination of third parties. Past experience includes Railroad, Airport, Roadway, Bridges, Utilities, CIDH, Soil Stabilization, Post Tension, Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE), 3rd Party Coordination. Francisco’s previous roles included change management, project budgeting, scheduling, stakeholder coordination, oversight inspection, quantity verification, fair cost estimates.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
Durfee Avenue Grade Separation, Pico Rivera, CA. Construction Inspector/Office Engineer. Francisco’s responsibilities include construction observation and verifications and assisting in various tasks to be assigned by the Resident Engineer and project team. PreScience is providing construction management services for the construction of the Durfee Avenue
Grade Separation Project. The project will grade separate the roadway and the railroad tracks on Durfee Avenue in the City of Pico Rivera. Plans call for constructing a roadway underpass on Durfee Avenue, between Beverly Road and Whittier Boulevard, under the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, with retaining walls and a new railroad bridge. Key project features include earthwork, staging and detours, permanent signing, stripping, traffic signals, utility relocations, storm drains, pump station, RR bridge construction, shoofly tracks, railroad force account work, RR coordination, retaining walls, shoring, falsework review and approval, erection analysis, and street closures.

I‐5 Widening, Burbank, CA. Office Engineer/Construction Inspector. SCRRA(Metrolink) Related Construction: SCRRA facilities between Burbank Boulevard to Hollywood Way. AECOM is developing designs for: (1) elevating 2.3 miles of existing railroad tracks; (2) two double‐track railroad bridges to accommodate two new elevated tracks at Empire Avenue and Buena Vista Street, with abutment and piers for one additional track in the future; (3) relocation of existing longitudinal and parallel utilities, such as telephone, signal, fiber optic, oil, gas and electrical; (4) all temporary and permanent trackwork, grading, drainage facilities, and access driveways; and (5) embankment, supported by retaining structures, to elevate the existing two tracks to permanent locations and with provisions for one additional track.

Antelope Valley Track Improvements, Canyon Country, CA. Office Engineer. Project range from station improvement, relocation of utilities, construction of facility layover, earthwork for new track construction, and improvements of current track. This contract was comprised of three different projects that included a service facility for a 4 passenger train track yard, construction of new mechanic’s garage for Amtrak and the demolition of the old mechanic area and US Mail platform, and construction of a new security guard monitoring entrance with automated barrier gate operators; access road area lighting; landscape & irrigation, and concrete pavement. Project required extensive coordination with So. Cal Gas Co, LADWP, and rail companies.

Orange Station Pedestrian Crossing, Orange, CA. Office Engineer. Provided Construction Management Services to Metrolink in the execution of Contract C3092‐08, the installation of a pedestrian underpass at the Orange Station while maintaining live rail traffic, relocation and improvement of utilities, installation of new inter‐track fence.

Montclair Station Pedestrian Underpass and Ontario Platform Extension, Montclair/Ontario, CA. Office Engineer. Provided Construction Management and Inspection Services under Contract C3088‐07 for the installation of a pedestrian underpass at the Montclair Station and platform extension at the Ontario Station. Performed all services required of the CM in the administration of a single Contract covering two work sites and different work. Interfaced with UPRR, the Cites of Montclair and Ontario and Metrolink in contract administration, change order negotiations, and project scheduling.

Santa Ana Second Main Track, Santa Ana, CA. Office Engineer. Metrolink’s Orange County Line second main track project of 1.8 miles that run along Lincoln Ave in the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange. Adding the second track will improve efficiency of movement and do away with the idling ‐‐ reducing the noise, vibrations, and traffic delays caused by stopped trains. Part of the second main track project includes a series of community enhancements to be built by Metrolink. The City of Santa Ana negotiated the construction of a series of improvements that will enhance the appearance of the rail corridor where the second track will be located.

Experience
Years with Firm: 2
Total Years: 17

Education
BS, Construction
Management

Registrations
OSHA 30‐Hour
OSHA 10‐Hour
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 18 |
Steven Brown
Electrical Inspector
Mr. Brown has more than 27 years of roadway and electrical inspection for infrastructure construction projects. His expertise including construction management, contract administration, field engineering, schedule and submittal review, quality assurance inspection, SWPPP monitoring and inspection, contract change order cost analysis, claim mitigation and resolution.  Mr. Brown has extensive knowledge of con struction  practices on Caltrans Freeway Systems, Standard Specification, Standard Plans, and the Standard Specifications for Public Work Construction “GREEN BOOK”.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
SR‐60 Central Avenue Interchange, Chino, CA. Electrical Inspector. This project will widen the Central Avenue bridge and the on‐ramp and will widen the existing eastbound and westbound on‐ramp s. Responsible for Construction contract administration, safety review, and quality assurance inspection for all electrical related items include traffic signals, bridge and highway lighting, ramp metering and fiber optic communication systems; SWPPP review and inspection, utility relocation coordination, prevailing wage monitoring, project schedule review and analysis, contract change order ev
aluation and cost negotiation and potential claim evaluation.

San Pablo Phase I and Phase II Project, Palm Desert, CA. Electrical Inspector. The mile‐long San Pablo corridor connects shopping, restaurants, and other commercial services at El Paseo and Highway 111 with residential neighborhoods and civic uses including Palm Desert City Hall, Co llege  of the Desert, Civic Center Park, and eventually, CVLink. Mr. Brown is responsible for Quality Assurance Inspection on Electrical related items include Traffic Signals, Street Lighting and Fiber Optic Communication Systems; in addition, Utility Relocation Coordination, Prevailing Wage Monitoring, Contract Change Order Evaluation.

I‐15 Railroad Canyon Interchange Improvement Project, Lake Els inore, CA. Electrical Inspector. The project includes building auxiliary lanes on I‐15 to help drivers enter and exit the highway and reduce traffic back‐ups; adding two new lanes on Railroad Canyon Road through the interchange and new lanes to the on‐ramps and off‐ramps with I‐15 ;  replacing the northbound diamond off‐ramp with hook‐style on‐ and off‐ramps that both connect to Grape Street; constructing sidewalks and bike lanes along Railroad Canyon. Mr. Brown is responsible for Construction Contract Administration, Quality Assurance Inspection for all Electrical related items include Traffic Signals, Bridge and Highway Li ghting,  Ramp Metering and Fiber Optic Communication Systems.

Lonnie Partch
Building/Permit Inspector
Licensed and certified Combination Building Inspector with over 30 years’ experience in the industry. A dedicated professional, who has demonstrated exceptional responsibility, as well as being diligent and thorough on the job.

Dependable in completing projects accurately and timely.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
Various Projects at Bureau Veritas, Southern CA. Provides public works and bu ilding  inspections for jurisdictions throughout Southern California. Provides Subdivision, Grading, and Permit inspections for The Rancho Mission Viejo (The Ranch) Development project. Provides supervision of construction inspection on privately funded construction, grading and encroachments within existing public works (permit related) within the jurisdiction of the County of Orange or the Orange Co
unty Flood Control District. Ensures that all of the Grading, Subdivision and permits inspections are accomplished daily. Reviews the subdivision, permit and grading plans for concept and adherence to approved County standards specifications. Ensures compliance with traffic and public safety, NPDES responsibilities, materials testing requirements and to the standard pro visions  associated with all permits. Also, verifies inspection work and certification of improvements by completing Field Completion Reports. Additional include an emphasis on enforcing compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. This emphasis has been necessitated by the County’s increased responsibilities of documentation and field inspection as they per tain  to the Local Implementation Plan (LIP) of the Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Assure that projects are constructed per plans and specifications, comply with Regulatory Permits, meet standards for storm water pollution prevention and adequately address public safety and detour requirements.

Experience
Years with Firm: 27
Total Years: 2
Education
Elsinore High School
Experience
Years with Firm: 1
Total Years: 30
Registrations
ICC Certified:

Mechanical
Inspector
Mechanical
Inspector
Combination
Inspector
Plumbing Inspector
Electrical Inspector
Building Inspector
Commercial
Combination
Inspector
California Office of
Emergency Services:

Safety Assessment
Program (Evaluator)
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

19 |
Steve Skeffington
Building/Permit Inspector
Steve Skeffington has 22 years of experience within the industry. As a Building Official, Steve has been able to monitor, inspect, and ensure the structural soundness of buildings and that the project aligns with all codes and ordinances.

Steve has also earned various credentials throughout the course of his career, which has allowed him to further his skill set within the industry. He is detail‐oriented and a great team player. He has gained a lot of knowledge from his work on the field and has implemented this experience in all of his following projects.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
Building Official/Combination Inspector at
Bureau Veritas, Southern CA. Provides public works and building inspections for jurisdictions throughout Southern California. Provides Subdivision, Grading, and Permit inspections for The Rancho Mission Viejo (The Ranch) Development project. Provides supervision of construction inspection on privately funded construction, grading and encroachments within existing public works (permit related) within the jurisdiction of the County of Orange or the Orange County Flood Control District. Ensures that all of the Grading, Subdivision and permits inspections are accomplished daily. Reviews the subdivision, permit and grading plans for concept and adherence to approved County standards specifications. Ensures compliance with traffic and public safety, NPDES responsibilities, materials testing requirements and to the standard provisions associated with all permits. Also, verifies inspection work and certification of improvements by completing Field Completion Reports. Additional include an emphasis on enforcing compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. This emphasis has been necessitated by the County’s increased responsibilities of documentation and field inspection as they pertain to the Local Implementation Plan (LIP) of the Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Assure that projects are constructed per plans and specifications, comply with Regulatory Permits, meet standards for storm water pollution prevention and adequately address public safety and detour requirements.

Building Official/Combination Inspector, Private Sector, Southern CA. Provided building official and/or combination inspection services for various jurisdictions throughout Southern California. Worked at Rancho Mission Viejo conducting daily scheduled inspections for new home production and special projects for the ranch.

County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Los Angeles, CA. Construction Inspector. Provided continuous construction Inspection observation, verification and documentation as Inspector of Record (IOR) for the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Performed quality assurance/quality control inspections to achieve compliance with contract plans, construction plans and specifications. Kept the Resident Engineer and Project Manager informed of conditions which could result in contract change orders and/or delays and assist in proactively resolving these situations. Maintained an awareness of safety and health requirements and assuring compliance of applicable regulations and contract provisions for the protection of the public and construction project personnel.

Combination Inspector and Plan Reviewer, Private Sector, Southern CA. Provided combination inspections for various jurisdictions throughout Southern California and Clark County (Las Vegas) Nevada, including, City Center Las Vegas, Encore at Wynn, Fontainebleau Resort and McCarran International Airport. Performed a wide variety of complex technical plan reviews to ensure that the construction plans are in compliance with building, energy, accessibility codes, zoning ordinances and life safety issues adopted and enforced by the jurisdictions. Assisted building inspectors on difficult or unusual code requirements, issuing noncompliance notices, and maintaining records and documents.

Also provided front counter assistance and support to patrons of the Building /Safety Division.

City of Rancho Santa Margarita, CA. Building Official/Deputy Building Official. Oversaw and supervised the daily operations of the Building/Safety Department, Inspection and Plan Check Division. Performed all commercial and residential plan reviews of new, additions and alteration projects for code compliance of the California codes, Building/Mechanical/Plumbing/ Electrical/Energy and other State laws and City regulations. Supervised the counter services and staff and provided technical information and assistance to engineers, architects, contractors and the general public regarding the permit process, plan reviews, permit fees. building codes and regulations enforced by the City.

Experience
Years with Firm: 1
Total Years: 22

Education
Orange Coast
College ‐
Construction
Management
Certification
Program
Pacific Coast
Technical Institute‐
Construction
Technology
(Bachelor Equivalent
Degree)

Registrations
ICC Certified:

Mechanical
Inspector
Building Plans
Examiner
Combination
Dwelling Inspector ‐
Uniform Codes
ICC / AACE Property
Maintenance and
Housing Inspector
Electrical Inspector
Plumbing Inspector
UPC
Mechanical
Inspector
Residential
Combination
Inspector
Reinforced Concrete
Special Inspector
Residential Energy
Inspector/Plans
Examiner
Building Code
Official
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

20 |
Zachariah Roush
Materials Tester
Mr. Roush has more than 15 years of experience providing quality assurance services, materials testing, batch plant inspections and ICC inspections on various projects throughout California. He has experience performing soils compaction testing, concrete sampling and testing, and asphalt sampling and testing. He is experienced on Caltrans projects and has an extensive background in PCC and soils materials testing utilizing Caltrans Test Methods. He is also experience in asphaltic concrete materials testing on airport tarmac overlays, and possesses an in‐depth knowledge of FAA standards for HMA, PCC and reinforced concrete testing and inspection. Mr. Roush has worked for various agencies, including Ontario International Airport, City of Santa Monica, City of Costa Mesa, City of Fountain Valley, and City of Anaheim.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
Materials Sampling & Testing & Plant Inspection Support Services, California Department of Transportation, District 8, CA. Materials Tester. Mr. Roush performed testing on PCC, HMA and PCC materials in compliance with Caltrans, ASTM, and AASHTO test methods. He performed numerous compaction tests per CTM 231 and 216 requirements at multiple job sites, as well as plant inspections and beam and cylinder fabrication inspection.

Materials Sampling & Testing & Plant Inspection Support Services of EA 12‐0H1004, California Department of

Transportation, District 12, CA. Materials Tester. Mr. Roush provides material testing and plant inspection services. His ICC inspection background helps him provide educated assessments of the quality of soils supporting structures and roadways on the I‐405 Project. Mr. Roush has witnessed batching operations and performed beam fabrication and cylinder fabrication for concrete strength verification.

Puente Avenue Grade Separation, California Department of Transportation, LA County, CA. Materials Tester. Mr. Roush performed ICC inspection and observation for soils, reinforced concrete and structural steel and bolting. He performed compaction testing and inspection, concrete sampling and testing, and asphalt sampling and testing. He also

performed ASTM testing in laboratory and field, QA and quality control, and batch plant inspections.

SR‐215 Project, San Bernardino Associated Governments, San Bernardino, CA. Materials Tester. Mr. Roush provided QA services and Caltrans sampling and testing of soils, CMBs, HMA, and concrete. He performed sampling per CTM 125 for
concrete and asphalt batch plant inspections.

FedEx Ontario Expansion, Ontario International Airport, Ontario, CA. Materials Tester. Mr. Roush provided QA ICC inspection and observation for soils, reinforced concrete and structural steel and bolting. He performed daily monitoring and recording of contractor’s crew and equipment, tracking quantities, and reviewing reports and data sheets for assisting
inspectors/technicians prior to distributing to client representatives daily.

Experience
Years with Firm: 1
Total Years: 15

Education
High School
Diploma

Registrations/Certifi
cations
ACI Concrete Field
Testing Technician –
Grade I
ICC Special
Inspector –
Reinforced
Concrete, Soils and
Structural Steel &
Bolting
JTCP Certifications:

HMA I, HMA II, Soils
& Aggregate, PCC
CTM Certifications:
105, 125 ADMIX,
125 AGG,
125 BIT,
125 CEM, 125 GEN,
125 HMA, 201, 202,
205, 216, 217, 226,
227, 229, 231, 306,
375, 504, 518, 521,
523.2, 524, 533,
539, 540, 543, 552,
556, 557
AASHTO
Certifications: T11,
T27, R47, R76, T166,
T176, T209, T255,
T269, T275, T308,
T329, T335

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

21 |

6. Subconsultants
Firm Name
Discipline Work
Construction Engineering and
Management
Bridge Construciton Services
Civil / Structural Inspection
Builiding/Facilities Inspection
Electrical Inspection
Material Testing/coordination
Materials Laboratory
Labor Compliance
Special Inspections
Traffic Signalization & Lighting
PreScience (Prime)           
Alta Vista Solutions           
Bureau Veritas North America         
Dynamic Engineering Services, Inc.           

Alta Vista Solutions (Alta Vista) is a multi‐discipline materials engineering and inspection services firm specializing in developing and implementing complex engineering and construction solutions for public infrastructure projects. Their areas of expertise include engineering, inspection, quality management, asset management, and infrastructure services. The firm provides client support and construction oversight for many transportation projects, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD), San Francisco‐Oakland Bay Bridge Seismic Safety Projects, Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge retrofit, I‐405 reconstruction project and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) statewide projects.

Alta Vista’s staff have a wide range of construction inspection and contract administration experience. This experience includes scheduling and schedule analysis, estimating, document control, inspection coordination, and coordination of pre‐construction, maintenance and weekly job site meetings. Their engineers and inspectors have performed constructability reviews, monitored schedule and budget, provided strategic recommendations on cost, schedule and quality, reviewed CPMs, and reviewed and approved shop drawings, submittals and CCOs. They facilitate RFI responses, and documentation and mitigation of claims. In addition to these construction inspection services, Alta Vista is experienced in providing material engineering and certified technicians for inspection of structural steel and pre‐cast concrete products at the fabrication facilities and in‐service bridge inspection.

Alta Vista’s public relations and outreach professionals have experience working on public projects of varying types and scales, from smaller local government projects to national megaprojects. They have extensive experience working closely with public information officials to plan and implement outreach activities, including community and stakeholder outreach. They have also led the development and design of digital and print literature, and website development and maintenance.

Alta Vista’s personnel will be prepared to meet the needs of the City of Los Angeles by providing a qualified and experienced staff that possesses the certifications and practical knowledge that will be needed to successfully support this contract. All analytical results, calculations, reports and other documents furnished by the Alta Vista staff shall be of the highest standards of quality.

Created in 1828,
Bureau Veritas is a global leader in Testing, Inspection and Certification (TIC), delivering high quality services to help clients meet the growing challenges of quality, safety, environmental protection and social responsibility.  As a trusted partner, Bureau Veritas offers innovative solutions that go beyond simple compliance with regulations and standards, reducing risk, improving performance and promoting sustainable development.  Bureau Veritas’ core values include integrity and ethics, impartial counsel and validation, customer focus and safety at work.  Bureau Veritas is recognized and accredited by major national and international organizations including AASHTO, IAS, & ISO. Their assets consist of a solid and long lasting reputation that includes:
 Efficient international network; unique combination of national and local networks; high reactivity in deploying new capabilities; consistent and homogeneous service delivery.

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 22 |
 Brand and reputation, strong brand built over 190 years.  Skilled employees; robust technical expertise; entrepreneurial and client‐driven culture.  Recognized technical expertise; comprehensive portfolio of accreditations; thorough knowledge of regulations and standards; extensive markets knowledge.
 Broad service portfolio.
 All QHSE requirements met on every project, every time.

Improving the communities in which we live and work, while at the same time enhancing social, economic and environmental conditions has always been BV’s goal. Their award‐winning portfolio includes buildings and infrastructure with expertise in arenas, airports, highways, tunnels, bridges, public hou sing,  schools, healthcare facilities, parks and recreation, energy and utilities, security, and asset management.

Leadership has always played an important role in setting the goals for their achievements, however no more important than the employees who carry out this plan every day. Bureau Veritas’ dedicated professionals have always been at the for efront  of the process and spearhead the progression of quality construction projects.

Professional expertise, open lines of communication, and a supportive work culture are the core values of BV’s organization and are applied to every project we undertake. Their numerous, longstanding client relationships are a testament to commitment to understanding and anti
cipating project requirements and proactively responding to their needs.

Bureau Veritas North America – QA/QC Testing and Inspection Agency Bureau Veritas’ Special Inspection Agency, sits at the center of some of the largest infrastructure construction projects in the world.    Their team of highly trained Special Inspectors, Managers, & field staff have extensive experience in navigating the complicated rules, regulations, & code requirements.  Efficiency is their mantra; with global reach as a co mpany,  they have the unique ability to reduce costs by providing local inspectors anywhere in the world and directly at the source of fabrication.  Bureau Veritas holds Full AASHTO and IAS accreditation to perform all inspections required for capital construction projects across the US.  Their expertise is preeminent in soils, structural steel , soils, mechanical systems, fire protection, concrete, masonry, structural safety, foundations, piles, wall panels, curtain walls, energy codes, sprinkler systems, fire alarms and others. Communication is a key element in maintaining continuity throughout the construction process from beginning to end, and through communication and a talented management team with grea t  leaders in the field, Bureau Veritas has the ability to facilitate completion of the project and make it successful for all stakeholders involved.

Dynamic Engineering Services, Inc. (DESI) is a professional Construction Management firm located in the City of Corona.

DESI is a California Corporation established in 2008; it specializes in providing Construction Management, Contract Administration, and Quality Assurance Inspection Services to Cities, Counties, State, and transportation agencies for transportation related improvement projects.  DESI is a Certified Small B usiness  Enterprise (SBE), Women‐Owned and Minority Business Enterprise (W/MBE), Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE), and Underutilized Business Enterprise (UDBE).  It is our goal to provide our clients high quality service that is cost effective and responsive.

DESI has provided Construction Management Services to local transportation agencies in the Inland Empire Re gion  for the past eight years.  DESI’s expertise includes, Construction Management, Contract Administration, Roadway Quality Assurance Inspections, as well as many other specialized areas like Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program Monitoring and Inspection; Environmental Monitoring and Inspection; Labor Compliance Monitoring and Prevailing Wage Enforcement, Traffic Signal, Street and Highway Lighting, Fiber Opti c  Communication, and CCTV Systems Coordination and Inspection.  DESI has established a great working relationship with our clients, providing high quality services on time and within budget.  In addition, DESI staff has a wide range of project experience from mini projects to high profile complicated projects using different contracting methods includin g  traditional Design‐Bid‐Build, Design‐Sequencing and Design‐Build.

SERVICES:

Constructability Review
Construction Management
Project Management
Contract Administration
Construction Quality Assurance Inspection
 Specialize in Traffic Signal, Highway &
Street Lighting and Communication
Systems inspection
Office Engineering
Utility Coordination & Relocation
Claims Mitigation & Resolution
Labor Compliance Monitoring
Prevailing Wage Enforcement
Environmental Monitoring & Inspection
SWPPP Monitoring & Inspection
QSP/QSD Training
FIRM IN
FORMATION:

Founded: 2008
Form of Organization: Corporation
Number of Offices: 1 in Corona, California
Number of Employees: 9
DIR Registration No. 1000015375

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

23 |
SECTION C – Understanding On-Call Construction Management, Inspection, and Materials Testing Services

1. Project Work Plan and Methodology

1.A. Task Order Approach
The task order process will start with City issuing a task order assignment and, in response, PreScience will prepare a technical proposal with: a scope of services, a list of deliverables, a delivery schedule, a breakdown of proposed work, and a cost proposal in accordance with standard City procedures. All responses will use City's templates for preparation of individual task orders, providing standardized submittals and cost‐cutting process efficiency.

1.B. Task Order Scope, Schedule, and Fee Development
PreScience conducts all consulting services by adhering to clearly defined contractual and technical procedures that ensure traceability and accuracy at every step. We will carefully review each task order to ensure that specific and unique requirements are identified in advance and that the most appropriate, qualified staff members are assigned to provide services that lead to innovative and sustainable solutions. Project Management procedures will be utilized to ensure accountability, using a variety of tools to keep all tasks on schedule and within authorized budgets.

Upon receipt of a task order for a specific project from the City, PSC’s Project Manager, Peter Lim will review the specific elements of each task order and assess in‐house and subconsultant technical resources for suitability and availability. Mike and key personnel will gather project information; determine key issues; conduct a site visit, if appropriate; and coordinate with the City’s Project and Task Order managers to confirm the scope of work (SOW) and identify deliverables and the required technical documents. In coordination with the City, NCM will then prepare a technical SOW, a task order‐specific schedule, and fee proposal for review and consideration by the City.  The rates used is per the rate schedule previously approved by the City for the contract.

The schedule will indicate the start and completion dates of all anticipated work elements appropriate for the scope and anticipated duration, and it will be updated monthly, or as‐ needed, to show critical path activities, predecessor and successor relationships, overall progress, and percent completion by subtask.

1.C. Managing and Delivering Task Orders
PSC shall provide all construction management‐related services necessary in accordance with project task orders issued by the City, as needed.

Our scope of services shall include, without limitation, the services set forth in this section and parallel the services defined by the contract.

In the course of every project, there
can always be issues that may arise which can have potentially serious impacts on costs and / or schedules if not addressed appropriately and early in the project timeline. As noted, such issues should be anticipated and addressed during the final design process or prior to the beginning of construction, before advertisement, via constructability review(s). It is strongly suggested to allow for a 95% final design review followed by a constructability review prior to advertisement and award; or no later than the NTP / pre‐construction conference. A pre‐bid review of the contract documents is an option but would need to be addressed with the City and the contractor.

It will be the responsibility of PSC’s CM / RE and assigned Project Inspectors for each contract to recognize any issues should they arise, in as practicable a manner as possible and manage effectively as soon as possible. We will effectively communicate our concerns to the City and the
design team immediately so that corrective steps are taken to minimize construction impacts or delay. We feel that our team’s outstanding understanding of City processes, stakeholder relationships, experience with similar project management and procedures on this type of project(s) provides us with an excellent foundation for anticipating potential problems and developing solutions in partnership with the City.

Such issues would be best addressed prior to the approval of final PS&E for both and no later than the NTP or at the pre‐construction meetings and / or at the early stages of construction:

PSC Team has completed more than
100+ task orders for Caltrans, and
Counties and Cities in the Southern
California in the last 3 years. We will
draw on this experience that benefits
the City.

PSC's background and
extensive experience on On‐
Call Projects in Southern
California will ensure timely
delivery of task orders on
schedule and within budget.

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

24 |
 Public and worker safety
 Project scheduling and sequencing
 Utility verifications and protection
 Traffic control and staging
 Public notifications and awareness (advanced and
ongoing)
 Environmental (SWPPP, NPDES, ESA Environmental
Sensitive Areas, noise, light, glare, exhaust, etc.)
 Community Outreach
 Accessibility of residents/business’s during construction  Contractor / equipment accessibility and storage
 Haul routes and staging of the various site locales (directions)  Ingress / egress to project streets (directions)
 Accessibility of narrow streets and selection of equipment  Construction equipment access and planning, routing
(ingress/ egress and notifications)
 Identifying all local stakeholders
 Temporary & Permanent ADA compliance

Scope of Services
PSC’s scope of services covers construction management and / or inspection services for the City of Los Angeles Public Works Department. Our team will work under the direction of designated City staff to construct a safe, quality project(s) on time and within budget. Our construction management and inspection staff are well‐trained to support our outlined approach. PSC’s comprehensive construction services to the City include providing expert staff to support the City in the following areas:

 Safety
 Quality Assurance
 Effective Communication
 Environmental and Project Stakeholder Stewardship
 Labor Compliance Reviews
 Pre‐Construction Services
 Construction Services
 Post‐Construction Services
 Claims Suppression
 Federal Funding Compliance

We have available a comprehensive roster of highly qualified staff that includes a Project Manager, Construction Manager / Resident Engineers, Bridge / Structure, Roadway, Civil and Electrical Inspectors, a SWPPP Coordinator and Construction Administration OE and Public Outreach staff to supplement the City’s resources. Our ORGANIZATION CHART ‐ shown in Section B ‐ and staff’s experience, includes staff that will be available to the City. Our specific planned approach and scope of services will generally follow the tasks as outlined below and can be modified to tailor the specific needs on the project based on each task as acceptable to the City.

Effective Communications
It is our goal to provide the City with the means to request construction support services and have that work take place in a timely, efficient manner. The process will be streamlined and effective to make it easy for the City to contract for services needed. Project Manager, Peter Lim, PE, will maintain close contact with the City to look ahead and plan for the City’s Task Order requirements. We understand that while the City aims to plan out its needed resources from time‐to‐time, emergency or last‐minute requests for staff could arise. We are prepared to respond to all requests for staff quickly and with the best staff to fit the requirements.

Task Order Assignment Methodology
Peter Lim, PE, will be the primary point‐of‐contact with the City and the focal point for PSC resources. PSC’s Team collectively has decades of experience working with public agency construction management and related services. Prior to the start of work, PSC will tailor our standard Construction Manager Procedural Manual (Project Manual) to be responsive to the City and compliant with the CT‐LAPM and project funding requirements through our Quality Control Process led by Peter Lim, PE. The Project Manual will set out how the team intends to perform the work and will include the following elements:

 Clearly defined management roles and responsibilities
 Interface with the City and participatory stakeholders  Overall public communication protocols
 Contact information
 Quality control procedures
RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 25 |
 Project management and inspection procedures
 Invoicing format
 Project documentation procedures
 Safety procedures
 Reporting standards and guideline
Task orders will be used to define the way work will be staffed and performed, how and when the staff is assigned, what
deliverables will be required, the task schedule and budget, and the parameters for monitoring performance.

Construction Services Coordination
PSC will assume all designated duties and oversight on behalf of the City, coordinating all inspection and testing activities for the assigned contract. PSC typically involves the project manager, resident engineer, and / or assigned project roadway or bridge inspector early in the contract to organize and set the preliminary process for exe cution, administration and documentation of the project. We anticipate preliminary meetings with City representatives will begin shortly after receiving the Notice of Award of contract, and we will be able to begin mobilization of personnel and begin planning and staging of projects in a timely manner.

Task Order Approach
Unquestionably, we see ourselves as an extension of the City’s staff and consequently our mission is to meet the City’s needs at every level.  The City will benefit from our prior and current on‐call construction engineering, inspection and CPM scheduling services contracts where we provide construction professionals ranging from Office E ngineers  to Range B/C, Range D, Principal Assistant RE (Senior) Engineers.  Based on our recent positive feedback from Caltrans REs, Seniors, ACMs and Office Chiefs and Caltrans Contract Managers (04A4256, 59A0894, 59A0841 and 59A1000) we will continue to utilize our current high performing staffing work plan while continuously looking for ways to bet ter  ourselves to be the consultant of choice for the City.  We have refined our approach and have broken the implementation down into four phases of the task assigned.  In the first phase, initiating and planning, we will continue to work closely with the City’s Project Managers to identify staffin g requirements, unique aspects, schedule, budget, and acceptance of consultant personnel.  During the second phase, staffing, execution and controlling, we will ensure the continuity of our staff that will be working on the City’s task orders (TO) and then we will continue to maintain regular contact throughout each task order, to ke ep  abreast of personnel needs, to provide guidance and continuous training and support to our assigned personnel, and to monitor and assure their performance met or exceed the City’s expectations at every level.  The third phase will be continuous checking, evaluating and improving our high‐performance service.  Not only highly quali fied  and trained personnel (right people for the right job) is a prerequisite for success but we must not overlook the importance of accurate accounting/budgeting and timely progress reporting and invoicing for each TOs.  The administration task of TO budgeting/accounting is to ensure continuous monitoring of the status of the construction projects, wh ereby underutilized funds in the TO are timely accounted for and transferred out from the TO.  The final phase will be the closeout of the task order, where we will ensure the TO is done timely and accurately.  We have consistently received positive feedback from Caltrans Seniors, Office Chiefs, Resident En gineers, ACMs, Structures Reps, as well as Contract Managers and other project staff, on the effectiveness of this approach.

Along with monitoring and assuring performance of our staff, key elements of managing the contract will be budget tracking, staffing forecasts, and timely progress reporting.  We will work closely with the Ci ty’s  Project Manager to establish report and information tracking formats that will provide the management information necessary for oversight of our contract and budget status, and will not be different than our past and current Caltrans contracts.  This approach will enable us to assist the City in managing the interaction of the four ele ments of any project through its lifecycle: Experience Personnel ▪ Knowledge of Processes ▪ Responsiveness ▪ Right PM Tools.

The following is a brief outline of our typical approach and scope of work. The duties and responsibilities are broken down into three (3) distinct task areas: 1) Pre‐construction Services; 2) Construction Mana gement Services during Construction; and, 3) Post Construction Services (Closeout) as shown on the sample plan on the next page:

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

26 |

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 27 |
Task 1‐ Pre‐construction Services
Pre‐Construction Documentation – PSC shall review drawings and specifications to ensure completeness and clarity. Prior to breaking ground, PSC’s RE/SR or Construction Inspector shall use digital equipment to photograph and video the entire project including surrounding properties to develop an “as‐is” condition record. The entire project shall have photos and video taken weekly.

Pre‐Construction Meeting – The team will attend a pre‐construction conference with the contractor and subcontractors to discuss the work involved, safety issues and to address issues that need to be discussed and resolved before work commences. During this conference, we will provide environmental awareness training regarding regulatory agency compliance measures.

We will prepare and distribute a c omprehensive environmental compliance handout and associated checklist to ensure that contractors working onsite are aware of the primary issues of concern and the measures required. This compliance handout will contain field forms, including daily logs, phone records, emergency / action item forms, non‐compliance reports and a lis t  of emergency contacts, agencies and phone numbers for distribution to PSC personnel and posting at the site.

Construction Meetings – During the coordination and pre‐construction conference, the City, contractor and PSC representative(s) will agree on scheduling of construction meetings to review progress, status and budget. These meetings will provide data and input for future decision‐making and alert the project principals of potential problems or deviations from the project budget, sc hedule  or construction.

Contract Documents – As an extension and continuation of the pre‐construction plan checks, we will utilize our field inspectors and project personnel to ensure compliance with the established specifications, material selection and contract requirements and implementation. Our resident engineers, construction manager(s), office engineers and / or construction inspectors (roadway and bridge) to be assi gned are all experienced in the types of projects outlined in your RFP and CIP plus familiar with the requirements of various funding programs. Our project records shall be kept in accordance with CT‐LAPM and City requirements in which utilize the Category File Management System.

Progress Reports – We will compile and prepare weekly and monthly progress reports from daily field observations and inspections. Our inspection team will use a daily diary; daily digital photos will be recorded and archived as project documents. PSC’s monthly reports will contain schedule progress, budget issues, phases of construction completed and potential problems that might affect the sch edule. Finally, the reports will contain the projected schedule and anticipation of work for the next reporting period.

Stakeholder Coordination – Close schedule control and monitoring will assist in coordination with the utilities to work at the best times to affect utility service. Also, close identification of utility supply lines, cables or other associated items must be clear and accurate in order to avoid unforeseen accidents or damage to these ut ility  items. Depending on the data gathered from the utility, plans can be made to schedule work in such a way as to minimize the impact to the delivery of services for each utility. Other stakeholder coordination will be implemented through a robust public outreach plan for project notifications and update to loca l residences and businesses.

Task 2‐ Construction Management Services during Construction Quality Control – The development and evolution of our QC Plan is designed to be used on numerous projects to conform to both Caltrans and FHWA requirements and is designed to mirror the FHWA audit process. PSC thus focuses on quality control and assurance in three main areas during construction on all projects:
 Quality control and quality assurance for materials used in projects and incorporating materials with all applicable specifications  Contract administration and documentation quality control  Construction safety
The PSC Team will assure quality by adhering to the City’s guidelines, addressing soils testing, aggregates, asphalt and other construction materials. Pay quantity documents are checked to ensure proper calculation. Pay quantity documents will be compared to material release forms to ensure that payment is made only for the re leased  material amount. Contract change order payments will be checked to assure they concur with the change order.

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

28 |

Additionally, our corporate quality assurance/quality control representative, Chuck Tran, PE will visit projects periodically to check diaries and pay quantity documents. These diaries are checked for complete information, which is an important tool in confirming the contractor’s work is compliant with the contract, avoiding claims and protecting the City or other affected stakeholder(s).

Shop Drawings – Drawings will be compared for compliance to the accepted standards established for the project and submitted for approval from the appropriate party, including the City, regulatory agency, designer or other engineering consultants.

Project Submittals – Concise and clearly indicated documents will be established and maintained for any and all project submittals. These submittals will be closely reviewed and compared to established specifications and standards for the project. On any given project, there are project‐specific items that will anticipate many submittals including the environmental and permitting portions of the project. All preparation of these submittals will be written with close coordination of the City, appropriate consultant or affected agency.

Construction Inspection – PSC inspectors have experience providing on‐call and project‐specific inspection of transportation and infrastructure projects for counties, cities, Caltrans, transportation agencies and other municipalities throughout the state. All inspectors will be fully briefed on the project, key environmental constraints and requirements, and the construction objectives. Our construction engineers and inspectors ensure compliance with contract documents and safety regulations on transportation and other infrastructure projects.

Our inspection support work includes earthwork, excavation, pavement rehabilitation, improvements and / or overlays, grading, paving repair, electrical, landscaping, pavement delineation, retaining walls, seismic rehabilitation, transmission pipelines, storm drainage, utilities, traffic signals and electrical items, form work, reinforcing and structural steel, concrete placement, and various bridge improvements. Our construction engineers have extensive experience with submittals, contract change orders, pay estimates, and as‐built drawings.

Additionally, they are cognizant of critical airport operations and work with all team members to ensure these operations are not disrupted.

Our specialty inspectors are also trained in QSP and / or QSD, ICBO, ICC, OSHPD, OSHA, and Cal / OSHA 10‐hour.

Materials Testing – PSC shall implement the City’s pre‐approved Quality Assurance testing program and the Caltrans Construction Manual for the assigned project. The resident engineer shall be responsible for supervising and coordinating the materials testing program. Material test results will be reviewed, logged and filed within the projects FHWA approved filing system. Any failed tests shall be addressed and corrected with the contractor and appropriate correction measures will be taken and doccumented. A passed test willl be coordinated with the inspector, to allow the contractor to proceed.

Testing shall be performed by subconsultant, Alta Vista Solutions, that will provide Caltrans certified technicians and testing lab. Sampling and testing activities shall be conducted in accordance with the City Quality Assurance Plan. Shop inspection shall be based on the fabrication schedule of the contractor’s fabricator. Consultant’s RE/SR shall coordinate directly with the fabricator’s QC Manager throughout fabrication.

Alta Vista will submit field reports of testing
and observation every day
they are on the project. Interim reports of test results shall be submitted quarterly. A summary report of the field observations and testing, and laboratory testing shall be provided upon the conclusion of the project. Unless otherwise noted, Alta Vista will submit a reproducible copy of the interim and summary reports in PDF format.

All materials testing will be recorded and logged by PSC’s RE/SR and Construction Inspector.

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 29 |
Source Inspection – PSC is ready to support the City with any ICC field welding or source inspection needs that may be required on a project.

PSC has more than 15 inspectors and 10 engineers with current or past experience at working as consultants to the Caltrans Office of Structural Materials as welding ins pectors,  source inspectors and / or Structural Materials Representatives (SMRs).

Traffic Control – The Traffic Plan and Control procedures will be reviewed by the construction manager / resident engineer in coordination with the assigned lead inspector. The continuous and safe movement of traffic through the specific project corridor and adjacent connecting city, county, rural, agricultural and /or public roads during construction fo r both AM and PM traffic, will be incorporated into the staging efforts and follow the MUTCD. This effort should include assessment of any haul and delivery routes, farming access, maintaining emergency vehicle access at all times, ingress / egress to the project, pedestrian travel, detours or delays that may affect pub lic or business safety and convenience. Safe and continuous travel through any of the affected corridor(s) must be ensured at all times, taking into consideration a wide variety of factors and users such as, school children, commuters, ranchers / farmers, equestrian, tourists, seasonal variations, de livery  schedules, business access and adjacent residential flows. Traffic flows for both vehicular and pedestrian of adjacent local streets and trails will be monitored continuously over the course of construction and adjustments made as necessary in order to minimize or avoid localized impacts. Prescience will assure that all temporary s triping  & lighting does not affect the local motoring public or existing traffic patterns.

Specific review and oversight work will typically include:
 Review and analyze the project Traffic Management Plan during pre‐construction review of the PS&E.  Review staging plans and make recommendations for amendments, if needed.  Coordinate with City staff and contractor to review the project and contractor’s baseline schedule to identify conflicts with the staging, haul routes, business activities, public safety and traffic management plans.  Review the traffic management plan and staging plan for potential conflicts with adjacent or nearby projects that are under construction and / or with emergency vehicular accesses and recommend revisions to the project construction baseline schedules, as necessary.

Safety – We recommend adopting a safety program that establishes a protection performance goal for the City construction management engineering services. In the event of accidents, our staff will record, photograph and document the mishap and follow procedures to notify all proper agencies and authorities. In addition, we will be responsible for the enforc ement  of all state and federal regulations for construction activities including those identified in the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, and ensuring we are in compliance with the LAPM.

PSC has extensive experience in developing and implementing project safety plans. Much of our experience is based on Caltrans requirements that consist of re gular safety meetings and training. We will be responsible for the enforcement of all state and federal regulations for construction activities including those identified in the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, and ensuring we follow Chapter 16 of the CT‐LAPM. PSC recommends that we and the Ci ty  collectively:
 Provide the project with guidelines for uniform safety system implementation that ensures strict compliance with statutory requirements
 Strive to eliminate personal injury and property damage, thus eliminating human suffering and reducing monetary loss  Establish communication lines, responsibility, and accountability for the safety system  Develop safety policies for areas and activities not covered by federal, state, or local standards

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

30 |
The PSC Team can assist with safety program development and contract surveillance, as needed. The PSC Construction Health and Safety Manual are available for use.  It defines PSC’s guidelines for developing site‐specific safety procedures and implementing compliance and enforcement stages of the safety program. Proposed PSC staff members completed an in‐house safety training program. Every 10 days, we will convene a safety tailgate meeting. Meeting minutes will be maintained in the project files. The traveling public’s safety through construction zones and detour routes will remain PSC’s priority. Our construction personnel will review detours and partial closures to make sure signs are clear, merging distances and lighting during night operations is adequate and safe bike and pedestrian access is provided, where necessary.

Change Orders – No change order will be issued to the contractor without the City’s prior approval. For any changes made within a City or Caltrans ROW, all change orders will be submitted to the respective agency in coordination with the City for their review and approval prior to issuance to the contractor.

The Construction manager / resident engineer will prepare a “Finding of Fact” statement that details the reason for the change or claim, chronology of events, schedule impacts, cost estimating and documents supporting the change or claim for distribution within the CCO package.

Claims Avoidance / Management – Should issues arise requiring a claim to be filed, the project manager or assigned resident engineer or project Inspector will review the merits of the claim and advise the City accordingly of such, if warranted. In the event of a dispute, our staff will always pursue resolutions in the best interest of the City, which is fair and will prevent further claim and / or subsequent litigation. Constant communication between the project manager / resident engineer or assigned Inspector and the contractor’s representative will help to prevent the further risk of claims and greatly minimize the owner’s risk. Most of the claims that arise should be resolved at the jobsite. We will prepare all documentation necessary for use in dispute resolution hearings.

Progress Payments – The project manager, resident engineer or assigned project inspector will provide the overall administration management for the construction management team commensurate on their assigned responsibility, with the specific responsibilities for administration, preparation, and approval of the construction contractor’s monthly pay application in accordance with the contract documents and City procedures. The project manager, resident engineer or assigned project inspector will prepare quantities and estimates of work carried out before the 20th day of each month and recommend approval to the City. Cost accounting records such as progress payments and CCO status will be kept in accordance with the Caltrans Local Assistance procedures for consistency and audit.

Documentation of Quantities – The construction management team will maintain a complete and documented electronic set of records for each contract pay item in accordance with the approved schedule of values. It shall include all necessary data to support the respective quantity installed and paid to date. The pay records which can be subject to audit, will be maintained in a neat, orderly manner and kept up to date at all times.

The construction management team will file monthly pay estimate forms and contractor monthly request‐for‐payment forms in pay folders for each month. For example, the backup information for each pay item will be filed in Category 48, “Contract items.” The construction management team will then be able to go to Category 48 to research individual histories for each item. The construction management team is responsible for having at least one pay sheet per item per month as work proceeds.

Schedule Control (Construction Management Responsibilities) – The project manager, construction manager/ resident engineer or assigned project inspector will review the contractor’s baseline schedule and monthly updates using the latest version of Primavera P6 and Claim Digger software. The review and acceptance of the contractor’s progress schedule is for compliance with the requirements of the contract documents only. Project schedule review activities include:

 Baseline schedule reviews
 Stakeholder coordination
 Utility conflicts / relocations
 Unforeseen conditions
 Clearance issues / conflicts / safety issues
 Environmental mitigation / permitting
 Delays in procurement
 Third Party coordination /cooperation

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 31 |
The project manager, resident engineer or assigned project inspector will not allow the contractor to change future logic, activity durations, etc., in a monthly update. The only allowable changes to the schedule will be as‐built updates (Time Impact Analysis) allowed by contract provisions.

Weekly Statement of Working Days will be used to tr ack  contract time.

Contract provisions hold the contractor to liquidated damage penalties for not finishing with the allocated time. The work shall be executed to completion in accordance with the specified schedule, subject to adjustment in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents
Budget Tracking – Our Cost and Budget Control Plan will include validating the assigned project budget, recognizing any uncertainty within the budget with line item contingencies, and providing descriptions of those uncertainties, all within a clear reporting structure.

Special attention will be given to value engineering from level prior to the final PS&E (or ad vertisement)  and to potential cost drivers on the project. Equally important, after construction is awarded, the PSC Team will require the contractor to provide work plans for critical activities, as necessary, and will review each plan for optimal production, using techniques like early procurement, concurrent submittals, reduced submittal review times and c oncurrent  construction activities.

We will continually track the progress of the work, including changes, and verify that the contractor’s invoices are accurate and complete through the tracking process. Furthermore, we will create various allowances for unanticipated issues. The PSC Team will keep the City and all affected stakeholders fully inf ormed  of all changes through regular reports on the status of the project budget.

Labor Compliance – Labor Compliance and review of certified payroll shall be carried out by PSC’s Office Engineer who will review, track and organize certified payroll received from the contractor. PSC’s construction inspector shall provide assistance by conducting field interviews and record accurate diaries to identify worker classifications and hours on the project Public Information – PSC shall disseminate information on the construction schedule, driving safety, and possible detours to the affected communities and the traveling public. The RE/SR shall coordinate with the City’s Public Affairs Department to inform them of road detours and changes that may be necessary. The RE/SR shall assist in all future pub lic  meetings as a forum for dissemination of information and proactive solutions prior to start of construction and during the course of construction.

QSD / QSP Water Quality Monitoring and SWPPP Support – PSC highly trained staff includes certified QSD / QSP certifications for water quality monitoring, oversight and SWPPP support as needed. The assigned QSD for the specific project will prepare a site‐specific Construction Site Monitoring Plan (CSMP) pursuant to the Construction General Permit (2009‐0009‐DWQ as amended by 2010‐00 41 ‐ DWQ). This work includes runoff and run‐on monitoring. Preparation of a Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) every time NOAA predicts a 50% chance or more of a storm event is also required.

PSC Team members have extensive understanding of the Construction General Permit (Order No. 2009‐0009‐ DWQ, NPD ES No. CAS000002).

Team members have implemented the Construction General Permit (CGP) from all perspectives and types of construction, giving PSC a well‐ rounded approach to stormwater compliance. We will review the Plans and Specifications per assigned task order or project, to determine the

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

32 |
appropriate Risk Level for potential sediment impacts. The daily monitoring of all construction activity is an important responsibility that must be effectively enforced at all times.

PSC can also assist the City for filing the NOI and NOT through the SMART system – the termination of the permit (NOT) is dependent on how the project is designed. Our QSP / QSD will provide the necessary guidance to meet these requirements.

Task 3 ‐ Post Construction Services (Closeout)
Final Inspection – Our key team members and local inspection team will conduct the final inspection of all construction and issue either via Deficiency or Final Punchlist of outstanding items necessary for completion or repair in effort to obtain acceptance of work. Developments and production of documents attesting to project conformance with plans, specifications and approved change orders will be completed and submitted to the City. We will also maintain communication and interaction with any affected regulatory agencies to ensure permits can be closed out with the respective permitting agencies.

Project Closeout – All applicable documents listed in the RFP will be prepared, inventoried, reviewed and submitted to the City for review and accepting. Should a project be federally, or state funded, PSC is familiar with Caltrans LAPM, Chapter 17 and will assist the City in completing all required forms to ensure full reimbursement for the project is obtained. Our core team members have executed project close out numerous times. The RE/SR shall prepare and submit the following documents in accordance with Chapter 17 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual:

 Final Detail Estimate
 Change Order Summary (Exhibit 17‐E)
 Final Report – Utilization of Disadvantage Businesses and Women‐Owned Business Enterprises (Exhibit 17‐F)  Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Certification Status Change (Exhibit 17‐O)  Statement of Materials and Labor Used by Contractors Involving Federal Funds (Exhibit 17‐H)  Materials Certificate (Exhibit 17‐G)

As‐Built Plans – We will coordinate the recording and compilation of a record set of as‐built drawings. We will provide a check on the drawings for completeness and accuracy, and make sure that the changes are properly noted and legible.

Contract Record Audits – PSC ensure the City that our construction management approach will satisfy any project record audit conducted either by the City and / or Caltrans. We follow CT‐LAPM Chapter 19 and conduct our own internal audit during (pre, during and post) construction phases.

Capability of Developing Innovative Techniques
PSC Team is always at the forefront of employing innovative techniques within the confines of applicable codes and standards. The innovation can be a product, a process, an idea or other avenues, which can be used in design and construction that results in a benefit or improvement over existing procedures.

In the ensuing paragraphs, we briefly present the experience profile of a few of PSC Team Members describing their capability of developing innovative or advance techniques.

Innovation Approach at during PS&E Development and CM. It’s important to point out the PSC Team brings a construction savvy innovated approach to our constructability
reviews and construction management approach by being on the cutting edge of construction technologies and procedures. Our PS&E reviews will ensure that the most current specifications are being used. As an example:

 Green Roads ‐ CalRecycle's Green Roads program promotes waste tires as a valuable resource and environmentally sound solution to solve engineering problems. Scrap tires can be ground and mixed with asphalt to pave roads, or shredded for use in landslide repair and embankments. These uses keep thousands of tires out of landfills with every project. Additionally, using tire‐derived products RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services

33 |
frequently results in significant economic and energy savings and is the first step in helping the state reach its goal to recycle 90 percent of its unneeded tires.
 Quite Decks –Caltrans has prepared a Memo to Designer (MTD) 8‐8 to modify the deck finish from transverse tinning to longitudinal tinning to dramatically reduce noise levels. Further Caltrans now included a quite deck specification in the 2015 Standard Specification 51‐1.03F(5)(b).  The specification requires decks to be either longitudinally tined or longitudinally ground and grooved.

Both approaches reduce noise levels but the grooving and grinding specification produces the quietest deck. Given the location and the desire to minimize noise throughout the corridor, we would suggest consideration be given to requiring grinding and grooving to achieve the best possible noise reduction on the new 91/241 Toll Express Lane Connector and Oso Parkway Bridge. Though there is additional cost associated with grooving and grinding, however experience has shown this treatment consistently reduces noise to the lowest possible level.
 Deck Crack Prevention – Caltrans has recently issued CPD 16‐13 to address bridge deck crack prevention. This directive allows for implementing a new specification to prevent premature bridge deck cracking. The specifications will modify the 28‐day shrinkage requirement, require polymer fibers in the concrete mix, and revise the concrete curing methods.  Schedule and Cost Management ‐ Projects that will be administered in accordance with the Caltrans Construction Manual, as well as current policies and procedures will be required to utilize Caltrans standard forms for printing and filing. One technical innovation PSC has successfully used on several previous Local Agency and Caltrans projects is the use of Primavera Contract Manager software that is fully customized to the Caltrans Construction Manual and 63 category filing system.  Cost Estimating ‐ PSC uses Heavy Bid 2016, which is a powerful program commonly used in the construction industry. The software can combine labor, equipment, construction materials, permanent materials and subcontractor costs rolled up into standard bid items. Our construction background allows us to combine the right pieces of equipment, crew sizes and historical production rates in order to produce an estimated cost. This software will be able to provide an output which will be easily comparable to your Contractor’s and Engineer’s Estimate. In this format it will be easy to identify potential differences between team members, and where to focus the teams’ effort during reconciliation meetings. The goal of which will be to find the most cost effective solution for the City.
 Aerial Photography ‐ PSC includes aerial photography and videos during the course of the project. These photos offer a tremendous display of the project for the City to use on the City’s web page and social media (i.e. Facebook and twitter). As an example, PSC invites City to our City of Larkspur Bon Air Bridge Replacement web page at https://bonairbridge.com/.

2. Defaulted/Terminated Projects
PSC has never defaulted on a contract or had worked on any projects that were terminated.

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 34 |
SECTION D – References and Experience

1. Example Project
Cities of La Mirada and Santa Fe Springs On‐Call, Los Angeles County, CA Contracting Agency: City of La Mirada and City of Santa Fe Springs PreScience is currently providing construction management and inspection under on‐call professional engineering services contract. Our personnel assigned to various infrastructure improvement projects provides review and monitoring of plans and specifications for compliance.

Additionally, PSC coordinates with the City representatives, contractor, and other consultants for meeting schedules, contractor’s submittals, survey, geotechnical test ing,  materials sampling and testing, and labor compliance during construction.

Projects involved:
 Lane Closure Moratoriums
 Multiple City Coordination
 Utility Coordination
 Traffic Management
 Public Outreach
PSC also monitors construction activities for compliance with Green Book Standards, Caltrans Standards, other local and State agencies standards including State Water Resources Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and Southern California Edison.

To date, task orders under this contract have included:
 Residential Street Improvement
 Greenstone Street Constructability Review
 CIP Projects
 Florence Street Widening
 Lakeland Road Improvements
 Meyer Road Improvements
 Los Nietos Road Improvements
 City Hall Parking Lot Improvements
Project Information
Key Personnel
Peter Ho, PE; Elmo Delos Santos,
PE; Mark Guillen; Norie Corpuz, PE;
Michael Nguyen, EIT
Construction Cost/Contract Amount
$5M / $1M
Contract Date/Year Completed
2018 / 2022
Funding Source
Local/State

RFP #22-048 - On-Call Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services 35 |

2. Client References
The client references provided below will attest to our dedication to delivering successful projects for our clients. We encourage the County to contact our references to learn more about our performance on assignments.

PRESCIENCE REFERENCES
(Construction Projects with PreScience as Prime CM Consultant) City of Santa Fe Springs On‐Call Inspection Services
Art Cervantes, Ex‐Assistant Engineer
11710 E. Telegraph Rd, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
(909) 421‐4986.  Email: [email protected]
Noe Negrete, Public Works Director
(562) 455‐5680.  Email: [email protected]
Caltrans 07A5194: Within the Boundary of District 7 and District 12
Emile Eid, PE, Contract Manager Caltrans District 7
100 South Main Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 276‐2054.  Email: [email protected]
City of La Mirada On‐Call Professional Services
Mark Stowell, City Engineer
13700 La Mirada Boulevard, La Mirada, CA 90638
(213) 792‐4879.  Email: [email protected]
Caltrans 59A1110 On‐Call Structure Construction
Engineering and Inspection Services
Boris Irahola, PE, Sr. Bridge Engineer, Caltrans OSC
4 Venture, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92612
(949) 279‐8469.  Email: [email protected]
Edinger Avenue Bridge Replacement
Kevin Tran, OCPW Senior Construction Manager
300 N. Flower Street, Ste. 838, Santa Ana, CA 92703
(714) 647 ‐3934.  Email: [email protected]
Durfee Avenue Grade Separation
Rene Coronel, SGVCOG Project Manager
4900 Rivergrade Road, Suite A120, Irwindale, CA 91706
(626) 543‐4914.  Email: [email protected]

3. Partial List of On‐Call Contracts
Project Name (Start – End Dates)  Agency  Terminated for Convenience
On‐Call Professional Services (2017‐Ongoing)  City of La Mirada  No On‐Call Professional Services (2018‐Ongoing)  City of Santa Fe Springs  No LA County Public Works On‐Call Inspection Services (2021‐Ongoing)  LACPW  No Orange County Public Works On‐Call Construciton Management Services (2020‐Ongoing)  OCPW  No 07A5194 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection (2022‐Ongoing)  Caltrans  No 08A3374 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection (2021‐Ongoing)  Caltrans  No 59A1110 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection (2020‐Ongoing)  Caltrans  No 59A0894 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection (2019‐2022)  Caltrans  No 59A1096 On‐Call Engineering and Inspection (2022‐Ongoing)  Caltrans  No 59A1000 On‐Call IQA Services (2017‐2021)  Caltrans  No
On‐Call PMCM and Staff Assistance Services (2021‐2019)  SCRRA/Metrolink  No PreScience Corporation
Jay Thakare, PE
125 Columbia, Suite A
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
T. 949-600-8631 (Office)
T. 805-791-6095 (Mobile)
F. 949-335-4610
E. [email protected]

B-1
E

XHIBIT B

FEDERAL CONTRACT TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND REGULATIONS
As used in this Exhibit B , this Agreement may be referred to as the “contract,” and Consultant may be referred to as “contractor.” In performing its Work under the Contract, Contractor must conform to all applicable federal, state, and local codes, laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which will have full force and effect as though printed in full in the Contract. In addition to the terms, conditions, performance obligations, and other requirements set forth in the Contract, Contractor must comply with the following federal contract terms, conditions, and regulations, which are incorporated by reference in the Contract:

1. Equal Employment Opportunity. Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, all contracts that meet the definition of “federally assisted construction contract” in 41 CFR Part 60–1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60–1.4(b), in accordance with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity” (30 FR 12319, 12935, 3 CFR Part, 1964– 1965 Comp., p. 339), as amended by Executive Order 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and implementing regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.”
41 CFR 60–1.4(b) provides:

The applicant hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction Work, or modification thereof, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary of Labor at 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid for in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, or undertaken pursuant to any Federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, the following equal opportunity clause:

During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action will include, but not be limited to the following:

Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in B-2
conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or appli cant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision will not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.
(4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of Workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or Workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and must post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
(5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
(6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of B-3
September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance:

Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

The applicant further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction Work: Provided, That if the applicant so participating is a State or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in Work on or under the contract.

The applicant agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance.

The applicant further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the applicant agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the applicant under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has B-4
been received from such applicant; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

2. Davis– Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141– 3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non– Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis –Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141–3144, and 3146–3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non–Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non– Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti –Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public Work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non– Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

3. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701– 3708). Where applicable, all contracts awarded by the non–Federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Under 40 U.S.C. 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard Work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard Work week is permissible provided that the Worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours Worked in excess of 40 hours in the Work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction Work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to Work in surroundings or under Working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence.

4. Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement . If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR § 401.2 (a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research Work under that “funding agreement,” the B-5
recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency.

5. Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401– 7671q.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251– 1387), as amended. Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 must contain a provision that requires the non– Federal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251– 1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

6. Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) . A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government - wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549.

7. Byrd Anti–Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) . Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non –Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non–Federal award.

8. 2 CFR § 200.322 Procurement of Recovered Materials. .A non– Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.

B-6

9. Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements. The parties to this Contract agree to comply with the provisions of 43 CFR 18, New Restrictions on Lobbying, including the following certification requirements:

In accordance with 43 C.F.R. § Part. 18, Appendix A, each of the parties to this Contract certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the parties, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with t he awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the parties must complete and submit Standard Form–LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The parties must require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients must certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification must be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

10. Executive Order 13513 of October 1, 2009, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving. Text Messaging While Driving by Government Contractors, Subcontractors, and Recipients and Subrecipients. Each Federal agency, in procurement contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements, and other grants to the extent authorized by applicable statutory authority, entered into after the date of this order, must encourage contractors, subcontractors, and recipients and subrecipients to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving company-owned or - rented vehicles or GOV, or while driving POV when on official Government business or when performing any Work for or on behalf of the Government. Agencies should also encourage Federal contractors, subcontrac tors, B-7
and grant recipients and subrecipients as described in this section to conduct initiatives of the type described in section 3(a) of this order.

11. Drug-Free Workplace (2 CFR §182 and §1401) . The Department of the Interior regulations at 2 CFR 1401 —Government-wide Requirements for Drug- Free Workplace (Financial Assistance), which adopt the portion of the Drug- Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 et seq., as amended) are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract. By entering into this Contract, the Contractor agrees to comply with 2 CFR 182.

12. Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 U.S.C. 874). Contractor agrees to comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5).

C-1

EXHIBIT C

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
Hourly Rates Schedule
RFP #22-048 - On-Call
Construction
Management, Inspection,
and Materials Testing
Services
Submitted by:

PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co.

March 17, 2022

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS) Consultant PreScience, a Bureau Veritas Co. x Prime Consultant ☐Subconsultant ☐ 2nd Tier Subconsultant Project No. Contract No. RFP #22-048 Participation Amount $ TBD Date 3/17/2022

BILLING INFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION Straight OT (1.5x)
$262.89 $262.89
$256.16 $256.16
$228.04 $228.04
$219.90 $219.90
$216.25 $216.25
$207.24 $207.24
$217.75 $217.75
$237.18 $237.18
$218.76 $218.76
$233.15 $233.15
$198.55 $198.55
Peter Ho, PE/ Principal $262.89 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $117.59 EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3
05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $114.58
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Fee = 10%
Name/Job Title/Classification1 Hourly Billing Rates Effective Date of Hourly Rate From To
Actual or Avg.

Hourly Rate4
% or $
Increase
Hourly Range -
for Classifications Only
DT (2X)
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
For Combined Rate
Fringe Benefit % + General &Administrative % = 103.24% Jay Thakare, PE/ Project Manager * $256.16
Jose Burbano, PE, QSD / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer *
$228.04 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $102.00
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Elmo Delos Santos, PE / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer *
$219.90 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $98.36
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Solomon Choi, PE, QSD,CCM / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$216.25 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $96.73
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
David Cooper, PE, QSD / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$207.24 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $92.70
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Scott Dendall, PE, QSD / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$217.75 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $97.40
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Aziz Maghsoudloo, PE / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$237.18 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $106.09
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Mario Alarcon, PE / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$218.76 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $97.85
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Janet Lee, PE, QSD / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$233.15 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $104.29
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Lindsay Green, PE / Construction
Manager/Resident Engineer
$198.55 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $88.81
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
$161.73 $242.59
$167.67 $251.51
$159.62 $239.44
$156.58 $234.88
$145.85 $145.85
$188.22 $188.22
$164.19 $246.28
$133.56 $200.34
$195.73 $195.73
$146.77 $146.77
$97.72 $97.72
$191.28 $191.28
NOTES:

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

3. Billing rate = actual hourly rate * (1+ ICR) * (1+ Fee). Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles for reimbursement.

Ramon Mantuano / Civil / Structure inspectors $313.17 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $70.04 Non-Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Michael Nguyen, EIT / Civil / Structure
inspectors
$145.85 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $65.24
Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Reza Fard, EIT / Civil / Structure inspectors $188.22 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $84.19 Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Hamid Boroomand / Civil / Structure
inspectors
$328.37 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $73.44
Non-Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Omid Khazari / Civil / Structure inspectors $267.11 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $59.74 Non-Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Jaroen Young / Civil / Structure inspectors $195.73 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $87.55 Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Francisco Villasenor / Office Engineer * $146.77 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $65.65 Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Nicole Fierro / Office Engineer $97.72 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $43.71 Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Norie Corpuz, PE / Scheduler $191.28 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $85.56 Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Mark Guillen / Civil / Structure inspectors * $323.45 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $72.34 Non-Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Masoud Khoshnevis / Civil / Structure
inspectors *
$335.35 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $75.00
Non-Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage
Reginald Agunwah, EIT / Civil / Structure
inspectors *
$319.25 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 $71.40
Non-Exempt, Non-Prevailing Wage

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS) Consultant : PreScience Corporation x Prime Consultant ☐ Subconsultant Project No. Contract No. Date Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

NOTES:

1. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

2. Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type.

3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.

4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

6. Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of Personnel Administration rules.

10. Add additional pages if necessary.

11. Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals.

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H2 Cost Proposal
Subconsultant 3: $
Subconsultant 4: $
Subconsultant 5: $

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be supported by mileage logs.

8. If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is its standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehicles that could be used for the same Subconsultant 1: $
Subconsultant 2: $
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3
$$
$
$$
SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS (Add additional pages as necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
$$
Mileage Costs for personal vehicle (IRS rate) mile $$
Facilities Captital Cost of Money (FCCM) 0.16% of DL $$ Certification of Direct Costs:

7. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

8. Terms and conditions of the contract

9. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

10. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

11. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

12. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

January 2018
Construction Management/ Inspection
Title *: Vice President
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 3/17/2022
Address: 125 Columbia, Ste A, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or Name: Jay Thakare, PE
Signature:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

Alta Vista Solutions, Inc.

NAME TITLE HOURLY RATE OVERHEAD PROPOSED  FEE MULTIPLIER BILLING  RATE Samir El‐Chammas Materials Tester $69.71 147.90% 10.50% 2.74 $190.96 Zachariah Roush * Materials Tester $61.00 147.90% 10.50% 2.74 $167.10 James Burton Materials Tester $61.00 147.90% 10.50% 2.74 $167.10 Aleksey Souglobov Materials Tester $56.59 147.90% 10.50% 2.74 $155.02 Nathan Ogbasellasie Materials  Tester $52.00 147.90% 10.50% 2.74 $142.44 Ruben Lopez Materials Tester $52.00 147.90% 10.50% 2.74 $142.44 * Key Personnel
Item # Test Description  Unit Unit  Cost
Field Testing
1 Field Compaction Testing and Sampling
(CTM 231, 375, 552)(ASTM D6938) Hrs. $150.00
2 Fresh Concrete Testing , Cylinder, Beams, Air Content, Unit Weight, Penetration Test (Kelly Ball), Slump, Conc. Temperature. (CTM 504,518,521,523,524,533,539,540,556,557)
(ASTM C172, C143, C231, C138, C1064) Hrs. $150.00
3 PCC Plant Inspection and Aggregate Sampling
(CTM 125) (ASTM D75, D75M) Hrs. $150.00
4 HMA Plant Inspection and Sampling
(CTM 125) (ASTM D75, D140) Hrs. $150.00
Lab Testing (Concrete Pavement)
5 Sand Equivalent CTM 217_ASTM D2419_AASHTO T 176 EA.   $125.00 6 Sieve Fine Agg. With Wash CTM 202_ASTM C136 EA.  $240.00 7 Sieve Coarse Agg.  CTM 202_ASTM C136 EA.  $125.00
8 Cleanness Value. CTM 217 EA.  $125.00
9 Concrete Cylinder cure and test CTM 521/540_ASTM C39 EA.  $75.00 10 6" x 6" x 18" Flexural Beams Tested Laboratory CTM 523,524_ASTMEA.  $90.00 Lab Testing (Asphalt Pavement)
11 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity [RICE] (ASTM D2041) EA.  $200.00 12 Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Non‐Absorptive Compacted Asphalt Mixtures and  Percent Air Voids in Compacted Asphalt Mixtures (ASTM D3203, D6926, D2726) (3 Briquettes)
EA.  $300.00
13 Determining the Asphalt Binder Content Of Asphalt Mixtures By The
Ignition Met hod  (ASTM D6307)
EA.  $600.00
Compaction Testing (Soils and Aggregate)
14 Compaction Testing  (ASTM D1557) EA.   $600.00

ALTA VISTA SOLUTIONS WHITTIER LAB MATERIALS TESTING FEE

SCHEDULE
2022

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS) Consultant Bureau Veritas North America ☐ Prime Consultant x Subconsultant ☐ 2nd Tier Subconsultant Project No. Contract No. Participation Amount $ Date 3/17/2022

BILLING INFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION
Straight OT (1.5x)
$105.00 $157.50
$160.00 $240.00
$105.00 $157.50
$160.00 $240.00
$105.00 $157.50
$160.00 $240.00
$105.00 $157.50
$160.00 $240.00
Brian Kircher
Building/Permit Inspector $210.00 05/01/2022 04/30/2023 Exempt, Prevailing Wage $320.00
For Combined Rate
Fringe Benefit % + General &Administrative % = 132% $320.00
Steve Skeffington *
Building/Permit Inspector
Exempt, Prevailing Wage
Fee = 10%
Name/Job Title/Classification1 Hourly Billing Rates Effective Date of Hourly Rate From To
Actual or Avg.

Hourly Rate4
% or $
Increase
Hourly Range -
for Classifications Only
Building/Permit Inspector 04/30/2023
Exempt, Prevailing Wage
DT (2X)
$210.00 05/01/2022 04/30/2023
$320.00
$210.00 05/01/2022
David Boardman
Building/Permit Inspector
Exempt, Prevailing Wage
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3
$320.00
Lonnie Partch *
$210.00 05/01/2022 04/30/2023
NOTES:

1. Key personne must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amende

3. Billing rate = actual hourly rate * (1+ ICR) * (1+ Fee). Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in acc dance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles for reimbursement.

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly te for that classification.

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS) Consultant Bureau Veritas North America ☐ Prime Consultant X Subconsultant Project No. Contract No. Date 3/17/22 Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

NOTES:

1. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

2. Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type.

3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in t he overhead rate.

4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

6. Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of P ersonnel Administration rules.

10. Add additional pages if necessary.

11. Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals.

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H2
Cost Proposal
SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS (Add additional pages as necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Plan Sheets $$
Mileage Costs $ $IRS Rate
Equipment Rental and Supplies $ $
Subconsultant 1: $
Subconsultant 2: $
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3
Test $$
Vehicle $
Permit Fees $$
Subconsultant 3: $
Subconsultant 4: $
Subconsultant 5: $

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for c ompany vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be supported by mileage logs.

8. If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is its standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehicles that could be used for the same Certification of Direct Costs:

7. Gen erally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

8. T
erms and conditions of the contract

9. T
itle 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

10. 48 C
ode of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

11. 23 C
ode of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

12. 48 C
ode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
Building/Permit Inspection
Title *: VP
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 03/17/2022
Address: 110 Blue Ravine Rd, Ste 101, Folsom, CA 95630
* A
n individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or Nam e: Craig Baptista
Signature:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and

Dynamic Engineering Services, Inc.

Local Assistance Procedure Manual EXIBIT 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant Dynamic Engineering Services, Inc. Prime Consultant ☒ Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant Project No. Contract No. Date
= 0.00%
= 124.49%
= 124.49%
Actual or Avg.

Hourly Rate3
$185.20 $185.20 $185.20 $75.00
$190.76 $190.76 $190.76 $77.25
$196.48 $196.48 $196.48 $79.57
$202.38 $202.38 $202.38 $81.95
$208.45 $208.45 $208.45 $84.41
$160.51 $193.01 $225.51 $65.00
$165.33 $198.80 $232.28 $66.95
$170.29 $204.76 $239.24 $68.96
$175.39 $210.91 $246.42 $71.03
$180.66 $217.23 $253.81 $73.16
$155.57 $155.57 $155.57 $63.00
$160.24 $160.24 $160.24 $64.89
$165.05 $165.05 $165.05 $66.84
$170.00 $170.00 $170.00 $68.84
$175.10 $175.10 $175.10 $70.91
$160.51 $193.01 $225.51 $65.00 $62.00 - $68.00
$165.33 $198.80 $232.28 $66.95 $63.86 - $70.04
$170.29 $204.76 $239.24 $68.96 $65.78 - $72.14
$175.39 $210.91 $246.42 $71.03 $67.75 - $74.31
$180.66 $217.23 $253.81 $73.16 $69.78 - $76.53
NOTES:

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.

Participation Amount $
01/01/2025 12/31/2025 3.0%
01/01/2025 12/31/2025

3.0%
01/01/2025 12/31/2025 3.0%
01/01/2026
=

3.0%

0.0%

3.0%
01/01/2023
01/01/2026 12/31/2026
01/01/2025 12/31/2025
01/01/2023 12/31/2023
01/01/2024
Steve Carbajal, Construction Inspector Electrical
Senior Construction Inspector
**
Construction Inspector, Electrical **
Steven Brown, Construction Inspector
Construction Inspector * **
12/31/2024 3.0%

3.0%
01/01/2024 12/31/2024
01/01/2022 12/31/2022 0.0%

3.0%
01/01/2026 12/31/2026 3.0%

3.0%01/01/2024 12/31/2024

0.0%

3.0%
01/01/2022 12/31/2022

3.0%

3.0%
12/31/2023
01/01/2022 12/31/2022
01/01/2023 12/31/2023
12/31/2023

3.0%
01/01/2024 12/31/2024 3.0%
01/01/2026 12/31/2026
3/4/2022
Home Office ICR%
Field Office ICR%
Combined ICR%
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
For Combined Rate
OR
For Home Office Rate
Fringe Benefit % + General &Administrative %
Fringe Benefit 34.61% + General &Administrative 89.88% For Field Office Rate
Fringe Benefit 34.61% + General &Administrative 89.88% Hourly Billing Rates2
Straight OT(1.5x) OT(2x)
Effective Date of Hourly Rate
From To
% or $
Increase(a)
Hourly Range -
for Classifications Only

BILLING INFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION
OH Rate Fee
12/31/2026

3. Billing rate = actual hourly rate * (1+ ICR) * (1+ Fee). Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles for reimbursement.

EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3
(CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) Name/Job Title/Classification1

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 10%
01/01/2022 12/31/2022 0.0%
01/01/2023
(Add pages as necessary)

3.0%
Chia-Chi Wang, PE, PMP, QSD
Labor Compliance Officer

January 2018
Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
☐ P rime Consultant ☒ S ubconsultant
Date
Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

NOTES:

1. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

6. Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of Personnel Administration rules.

10. Add additional pages if necessary.

11. Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals. supported by mileage logs

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be

8. If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is its standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehicles that could be used for the same purpose.

9. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles.

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be

2. Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type.

3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.

Subconsultant 4: $
Vehicle $ $
Subconsultant 1: Assuming 200 miles round-trip and 80 shifts, Unit Cost is based on IRS 2022 Rate $ Subconsultant 2: $
Subconsultant 3: $
$$Permit Fees
Test $ $
Plan Sheets $ $
Equipment Rental and Supplies $ $
$ -
Mileage Costs*
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS (Add additional pages as necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Consultant Dynamic Engineering Services, Inc.

Project No. Contract No. 3/4/2022

January 2018