Rialto City Council
April 12, 2022

Page-1

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF RIALTO AND
STK ARCHITECTURE, INC.

THIS ON CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 12th day of April, 2022, by and between the City of Rialto, a municipal corporation and California general law city (“City”), and STK Architecture , Inc., a California corporation, (“Cons ultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by request for qualifications the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 1 of this Agreement.

B. Following the submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, Consultant was selected by the City to be eligible to perform those services as needed and requested by the City.

C. During the Term of this Agreement, the City may initiate or continue various projects for which Consultant’s services may be used. For a given project, the City may solicit proposals from Consultant and other firms to perform services on that project, and the City may award a Task Order for the project based on availability, schedule, and cost proposal. Consultant understands and acknowledges that this Agreement provides no guarantee that Consultant will be selected to perform any volume or work for the City.

D. Pursuant to Chapter 2.48 of the Rialto Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consul tant for the performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

Scope of Services . Contractor agrees to perform on- call construction management, inspection and mater ials testing services associated with Request for Proposals No. 22- 044 “On- Call” Professional Architectural Services (hereinafter, the “Scope of Services” or “Services”) as requested and authorized by the City. The Scope of Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and Page-2
incorporated herein. When the City desires to utilize Contractor for the Scope of Services, the City will is sue a Task Order that includes a Scope of Services to be performed and the compensation to be paid for the Services within the Task Order. Upon the issuance of a Task Order, that Task Order shall immediately be incorporated into this Agreement as part of Exhibit “A” (e.g., the first Task Order will be Exhibit “A -1”, the second Exhibit “A-2,” etc.). Each Task Order is made a part of t his Agreement by this reference and encompassed within the Scope of Services of this Agreement.

As a material inducement for City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, it meets all local, state, and federal requirements in performing the Services, and it is experienced in performing the work and Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently, and to the best of its ability, experience, and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more professional firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

The Agreement between the Parties shall consist of the following: (1) this Agreement, including the Recitals; (2) the Scope of Services , including all Task Orders ; (3) the City’s Request for Qualifications No. 22-044; and, (4) the Consultant’s signed, original proposal submitted to the City (“Consultant’s Proposal”), (collectively referred to as the “Contract Documents”). The Contract Documents and Accepted Proposal shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the Scope of Services , Consultant’s Proposal , and/or this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any federal, state, or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. In addition to the terms, conditions, and performance obligations for the Work set forth in this Contract, Consultant must also comply with the federal contract terms, conditions, rules, and regulations set forth in the attached Exhibit B (“Federal Contract Terms, Conditions, and Regulations”).

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain, at its sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its officers, employees Page-3
or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to c ommencement of Services hereunder. If Consultant discovers any latent or unknown conditions that will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, then Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at City’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.6 Care of Work.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, paper s, documents, plans, studies, and/or other components thereof, to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.7 Prevailing Wages.

Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq. and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which r equire the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “Public Works” and “Maintenance” projects. It is the understanding of City and Consultant that the Prevailing Wage Laws may not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder. However, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents, and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless specified in this Agreement, neither Party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.9 Additional Services.

Page-4
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services under an individual Task Order, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to, or deducting from said work. No such extra work or change may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, describing in detail the extra work or change and the reason(s) therefor and incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Task Order sum for the actual cost of the extra work or change, and/or (ii) the time to perform the Task Order, which said adjustments shall be reflected in an amendment to the Task Order subject to the written approval of the Parties . Any amendment to a Task Order shall be reviewed and approved by the City Manager. In accordance with Rialto Municipal Code section 2.48.180, i ncreases in compensation for a Task Order may be approved by the City Manager provided: (a) the initial Task Order amount was less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) and the amended Task Order sum when considering any or all amendments wi ll not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000); or (b) the Task Order was approved by the City Council and the increases in compensation taken either separately or cumulatively do not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000). Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively must be approved by the City Council. Payment for additional services rendered by Consultant under a given Task Order requires the submission of the actual costs of Consultant’s performance of the extra work with the invoice(s) for the extra work claim(s), as provided in Section 2.4. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other contractors.

No claim for an adjustment in the contract amount or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

2.1 Contract Sum.

City and Consultant acknowledge and agree that the Services required by this Agreement will vary dependent upon the number, type, and extent of the Services the Consultant shall provide; and no guarantee of the extent or the type of Services required of Consultant under the terms of this Agreement is made by the City. The annual or total level of Services required by this Agreement is unknown, and may significantly increase or decrease from year to year. In acknowledgement of the fact that the number and type of projects requiring the Consultant’s Services has not been identified for this Agreement, City and Consultant acknowledge and agree that a specific “Maximum Contract Amount” shall be imposed on each separat e project that the City may assign Consultant as provided in Section 1.9 and in this Section 2.1. Each such separate project shall be identified as a Task Order authorized by the City Manager or designee as provided in this Section 2.1. T he Maximum C ontract Amount of this Agreement is undefined, and is subject to the number and type of projects requiring the Consultant’s Services throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, if any. Consultant’s compensation shall be limited to the Maximum Contract Amount identified on each separate, individually Page-5
authorized Task Order corresponding to a project requiring the Services of the Consultant in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation set forth in the attached Exhibit “C” .

Subsequent approval of individual Task Orders shall be approved in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2.48 of the Rialto Municipal Code.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services ; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the Services . If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.4 Invoices.

Unless otherwise specified by the Task Order, each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under t his Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub- category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

City may independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission.

2.5 No Waiver.

Page-6
Review and payment by City to Consultant of any invoice for work performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any defects in work performed by Consultant or of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

The Services authorized by each Task Order shall be completed pursuant to the schedule stated in the Task Order. Should the Services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Contractor shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Contractor to continue performing the Services.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall, within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay, notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer shall extend the time for performance in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section

1.9. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the C ity for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Subject to the termination provisions of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for three years commencing on the date first ascribed above. City may extend the Term of this Agreement two times for one year each time, for a total potential term of five years.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.

Page-7
The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Tony Finaldi Owner, Board Director
(Name) (Title)

It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent pers onnel to perform Services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or subcontractor of Consultant, Consultant shall, immediately upon a Reassign Notice from City of such desire of City, reassign such persons or persons.

4.2 Status of Consultant.

Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care, or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.

4.3 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be the City Manager or other such person designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer.

Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager , to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

Page-8

4.4 Independent Contractor.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation, or hours of service.

Consultant shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to Ci ty a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS

5.1 Insurance Coverages.

The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents of City:
(a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance (Occur rence Form CG0001 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, then the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence limit.
(b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure, and provide legal defense for both the Page-9
Consultant and the City against any loss, claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or Services contemplated in this Agreement.
(c) Automotive Insurance (Form CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) including “any auto” and endorsement CA 0025 or equivalent). A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non- owned, leased, and hired cars.
(d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of, or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 5 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s Services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
(e) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements.
(f) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.

All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents as additional insureds, and any insurance maintained by City or its officers, employees, or agents shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant’s insurance. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its officers, employees, and agents and their respective insurers. The insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self -insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self -insured retention. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any Party hereto without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or Services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance or appropriate insurance bi nders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

Any failure to comply wit h the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City.

Page-10
City, its respective elected and appointed officers, directors, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. The Consultant agrees that the requirement to provide insurance shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or proper ty resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3.

In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to Section 5.1, and such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to City.

5.3 Indemnification.

To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether act ual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations, or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), arising from Consultant’s reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent perform ance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents, or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations Page-11
or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, i ts officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.

Consultant shall incorporate similar, indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor c ompliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional Services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligat ion shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Consultant’s Services are subject to California Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity, including the cost to defend, shall be limited to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8.

5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety.

Insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business i n California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or Services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager Consultant.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Page-12
Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services.

Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and tr anscripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of 3 years following completion of the Services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest.

6.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will mat erially increase or decrease the cost of the work or Services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or Page-13
disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Cons ultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to r epresent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant.

However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.

In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, Eastern Division.

7.2 Disputes; Default.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall proceed with Page-14
payment on the invoices only when the default is cured. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any b reach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or Services by Consultant shall not constit ute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non- defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive i n this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.

Page-15

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contr act Officer. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer.

Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the ev ent of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the City need not provide the Consultant with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to f ulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set -off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement or any individual Task Order subsequently awarded.

Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision Page-16
relating to the Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Additionally, pursuant to Rialto Municipal Code section 2.48.145, Consultant represents that it has disclosed whether it or its officers or employees is related to any officer or employee of the City by blood or marriage within the third degree which would subject such officer or employee to the prohibition of California Government Sections 87100 et. seq., Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation Section 18702, or Government Code Section 1090. To this end, by approving this Agreement, Consultant attests under penalty of perjury, personally and on behalf of Consultant, as well its officers, representatives, that it/they have no relationship, as described above, or financial interests, as such term is define d in California Government Section 87100 et. seq., Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation Section 18702, or Government Code Section 1090, with any City of Rialto elected or appointed official or employee, except as specifically disclosed to the City in writing.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class.

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or Services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (“City Facilities”), as may be reasonably necessary Page-17
for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnis hing of City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet, or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.

9.2 Payment of Taxes.

Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any federal and state taxes.

9.3 Notices.

All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered, sent by pre- paid First Class U.S. Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered or sent by facsimile with attached evidence of completed transmission, and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i) the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice if delivered personally or by messenger or overnight courier; (ii) three (3) business days after the date of posting by the United States Post Office if by mail; or (iii) when sent if given by facsimile. Any notice, request, demand, direction, or other communication sent by facsimile must be confirmed within forty-eight (48) hours by letter mailed or delivered. Other forms of electronic transmission such as e- mails, text messages, instant messages are not acceptable manners of notice required hereunder.

Notices or other communications shall be addressed as follows:

If to City: City of Rialto
150 S. Palm Ave.

Rialto, CA 92376
Attn: City Manager
Tel: (909) 820-2525
Fax: (909) 820-2527

With copy to: Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
1770 Iowa Avenue, Suite 240
Riverside, CA 92507
Attn: Eric S. Vail, City Attorney
Tel: (951) 788-0100
Fax: (951) 788-5785

If to Consultant: STK Architecture, Inc.
42095 Zevo Drive, Suite A15
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: Tony Finaldi
Tel: (951) 296-9110
Email: [email protected]

Page-18
Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing.

9.4 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.5 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.6 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

9.7 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not aff ect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.8 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

Page-19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed and entered into this Agreement on the date first written above.

CITY: CONSULTANT:

CITY OF RIALTO, a municipal
corporation
STK ARCHITECTURE, INC., a
California corporation

By: By:

Marcus Fuller, City Manager Signature

ATTEST:

Name

By:

Barbara A. McGee, City Clerk
Title

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Signature

By:

Eric S. Vail, City Attorney Name

Title

**Two signatures are required if a
corporation**

A-1
EXHIBIT “A“

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall provide on-call professional architectural services more generally described herein.

The selected firms shall provide first -rate architectural services on an as -needed basis for various City projects as assigned. Responsibilities may include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Lead a team to prepare architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, safety systems, and other drawings as needed for new infrastructure, upgrades or improvements for municipal buildings and structures.

2. Preparation of conceptual drawings, plans and renderings as may be requested by the City for projects being contemplated or visioning sessions with the community.

3. Move assigned projects through all City entitlement processes, including but not limited to, architectural review, planning approval, building & safety, engineering and construction, including City Council approval if applicable.

4. Architectural services for designated historical buildings, as well as completely new construction, alteration and renovation projects on historic sites. This includes project design, research, evaluation, planning, handicapped accessibility, and engineering services (civil, structural, MEP, land surveying, etc.) incidental to the project.

5. Attend meetings and prepare presentations for staff reports to City advisory board, commissions, and the City Council when said meetings relate to projects covered by this contract, and as warranted or directed by the City Manager or his/her designee.

6. Feasibility studies for new, renovation, and alteration projects.

7. Facility assessment, studies and/or audits to determine compliance with various federal, state, and local regulations (ADA, Building Code, Fire Code, energy efficiency, etc.)

8. Preparation of reports that may be needed for preliminary documents, working drawings, permitting, construction drawings, specifications, bid documents, and construction cost estimates.

9. Coordination with a sub-consultant to provide plans and construction drawings for the installation of fire sprinklers and fire alarm systems in new or existing buildings. This may be part of a larger project or a standalone project to install fire sprinklers and fire alarm systems in an existing building.

10. Provide construction advisement and/or construction management services, value engineering and advice on projects that need to be constructed in phases.

11. Provide documentation, assist in warranty review, participate in project close-out, and provide as-built record drawings as-needed.

12. Cooperate, coordinate, and communicate with all internal City departments and divisions as necessary. Coordinate meetings with City staff, contractors and other stakeholders as the project may require.

A-2
I
t will be the responsibility of the successful firms and to determine the necessary staffing level required to perform the scope of service of each project assigned. The City will not provide dedicated work space or office space, City staff, or City resources, printing or copying services, or clerical assistance for the performance of this agreement.

All s
ervices shall be performed in compliance with the industry and professional standards and all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), current California Building Code, and the rules and ordinances of the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rialto.

The C
ity further reserves the right, when applicable and in the best interests of the City, to require the architect to engage sub-consultants with special expertise when the unique circumstances of a particular project warrants such additional services. The City may provide recommendations to the architect for consideration and reserves the right of approval of any sub-consultant selected by the architect on any project.

Specifically, Consultant shall provide those Services as outlined in its proposal date d March 17, 2022, included on the following pages.

FIRE ST A TIONS • ENTERT AINMENT • COMMUNITY AND LIBRARY • PARK FACILITIES

CITY OF RIALTO

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
(RFQ) #22-044
FEBRUARY 24, 2022

February 24, 2022
City of Rialto
150 S. Palm Avenue
Rialto, CA 92376
Dear City of Rialto:

STK Architecture, Inc. is pleased to submit our qualifications for Architectural Services.

We understand the scope of services for this RFQ to encompass a variety of architectural projects.

Executive Summary
Since our founding in 1969 STK Architecture, Inc. has managed projects for our growing base of over forty California municipal, County, State and Federal agencies. A substantial majority of these agen- cies have chosen STK for multiple repeat projects based on successful past performance. STK offers experience in the architectural execution of a wide variety of building types, armed with the latest trends in technology, sustainability, security, and cost-effective construction. STK has proven compe- tency, relevant to the City of Rialto, in developing the optimum plan to organize, utilize, and operate your projects. STK Architecture is currently executing several On-Call and As-Needed agreements with Southern California jurisdictions.

Project Specific Experience
STK Architecture, Inc. has provided On-Call Services for many jurisdictions in the past ten years, including, but not limited to:

1. Riverside County

2. San Bernardino County

3. City of Moreno Valley
STK guarantees that all contents of this SOQ shall be valid for 120 calendar days. We welcome the opportunity to present our ideas in more detail should we be invited for an interview. In the meantime, if there are further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
Tony Finaldi, Architect, NCARB
Owner, Board Director, CFO
951.314.3705, [email protected]

EXPERIENCE, KNOWLEDGE & REPUT A TION
A LETTER FROM STK ARCHITECTURE, INC.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] STK Architecture, Inc.
42095 Zevo Drive, Suite A15
Temecula, CA 92590
951.296.9110 • [email protected]
STK is a California
“C” Corporation
#953030155,
Established in 1969.

Tony Finaldi,
Architect
California License
#C31476
t fi n a l d i @ s t k i n c . c o m
cell: 951.314.3705

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

HISTORY AND FIRM PROFILE
Firm History
STK Architecture Inc., was founded in 1969.

We offer a full range of architectural services
including architectural design, sustainability,
interior design, master planning, and feasibility
studies. Our continued commitment to clients
and their needs has earned us the trust of
valued people and organizations.

Since our founding we have been involved in
a diverse selection of commercial, governmental
and institutional projects for a variety of
established clients.

Our firm is extremely sensitive to strict time-lines,
adherence to budgets, and the needs, opinions
and desires of our Clients.

Experience
Our team has developed professional experience
in many types of facility design, including:
• On-Call Services
• Administrative Centers
• Fire Stations
• Libraries
• Community Centers
• Multi-Cinema Theaters
• Live Theatres
• Entertainment Centers
• Specialty Retail Facilities
• Mixed Use
• Parks
• LEED Building Design
• Commercial Office Buildings
• Courtroom Facilities
• Communication Facilities
• Medium Security Prison Facilities
• Financial Institutions (Banks)
• Vehicle Maintenance & Repair Facilities
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

BUDGET HISTORY
Cost Estimation
STK and its consultants are prepared to provide
an itemized cost estimate at the 50% and 100%
Construction Document Phases.

Incorporated in the Estimate is a 10% change
order allowance and an escalation cost to cover
material and labor cost increases anticipated
during the time required to develop the drawings
and complete the bidding phase.

STK and its consultants perform in-house
quality control review at 95% Construction
Document Phase.

Example Budgets
San Bernardino County 911 Call Intake Center
Rialto, California
A/E Estimate:

Bid:

Change Orders:
$704,259
$710,867
$8,598 (1.2%)
Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center
Administration Expansion
Devore, California
A/E Estimate:

Bid:

Change Orders:
$1,200,200
$1,095,000
$31,146 (2.8%)
College Park Fire Station
Moreno Valley, California
A/E Estimate:

Bid:

Change Orders:
$2,000,000
$1,950,000
$43,590 (2.2%)
Moreno Valley Fire Station #2
Moreno Valley, California
A/E Estimate:

Bid:

Change Orders:
$1,600,000
$1,816,750
$34,518 (1.9%)
Northwestern Riverside County
Animal Shelter
A/E Estimate:

Bid:

Change Orders:
$25,000,000
$23,500,000
$188,000 (.8%)
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

STK ORGANIZATION CHART
Camille Pulliam Acton
CEO
Architect
[email protected]
Principal
G.V. Salts
COO
Architect
[email protected]
Principal
Tony Finaldi
CFO
Architect
[email protected]
Principal LEED
Roberto Rubini
Associate
Project Manager
Jonie Romano
Intern Architect
Victor Rocha
Intern Architect
Steve Blanding
IT Manager
Shannon Schindler
[email protected]
Financial/Office Mgr
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] John Ingram
Intern Architect
Jaisaeng Namvong
Associate
Project Manager
STK staffs each project with the most experienced staff available based on expertise and proj - ect work load. As a matter of course, STK employees collaborate on large complex building projects, and are prepared to execute virtually any architectural building type. Managing and maintaining staff work loads are, therefore, seamless and efficient. Currently, work load is steady and predictable. Members of this project team are committed for 25% of their time this year. Our policy is to commit 75% of employee’s time for the year leaving time for change orders and additional services, as required. This system ensures proper project staffing and client satisfaction, as demonstrated by our greater than 80% return rate.

Intern Architect
Carol Kurti-Greska
LEED
MPE Engineer / Steven Johnson, PE
412 E. Vanderbilt Way, San Bernardino, CA 92408
Design West Engineering / 909.890.3700

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

TEAM ORGANIZATION CHART
Project Manager

COUNTY OF RIALTO
Structural Engineer / Shawn Lothrop, S.E.
27369 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590
Innovative Structural Engineering / 951.600.0032
Executive Architect - Architecture, Interior Architecture and Cost Estimating Tony Finaldi, PA and Jaisaeng Namvong, PM
STK Architecture, Inc. / 951.296.9110
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Mr. Finaldi joined STK in 1994 and became an owner in 2016.

Tony has managed all phases of Fire Station Projects, Community Centers, Movie Theatres, and various Verizon Projects.

Tony currently serves as a Project Architect on various San Bernardino County and Riverside County Facilities Management projects.

He is well versed in coordination of construction documents with the various disciplines, document review, agency and contractor negotiations. Tony’s strengths are in overseeing document production and construction administration of projects.

Relevant Projects:
• Menifee Fire Station, Menifee, CA
• Desert Hot Springs City Hall, Desert Hot Springs, CA
• Northwestern RIVCO Animal Shelter, Jurupa Valley, CA
• Baker Family Learning Center, Muscoy, CA
• Brawley Fire Station, Brawley, CA
Role In The Firm:

Project Architect, CFO
Experience:

Since 1994
With STK:

Since 1994
Education:

Bachelor of Architecture
Woodbury University, 1993
Professional Registration:

CA Architect License #C-31476
NCARB #65520
LEED Accredited: USGBC 2009
T ony’s strengths are
in overseeing
document production
and construction
administration
of projects.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

TONY FINALDI
STK ARCHITECTURE, INC. RESUME

JAISAENG NAMVONG
STK ARCHITECTURE, INC. RESUME
Mr. Namvong came to STK in 2005 as an architectural draftsman and became an associate in 2019.

Jaisaeng has worked on numerous projects for San Bernardino County, Riverside County Fire Department and Facilities Man- agement. His experience includes Fire Stations, Animal Shelter, Juvenile Detention Facilities, Park Projects and numerous Tenant Improvements.

Jaisaeng’s strengths are in preparing construction documents and administrating construction while maintaining efficient and effective coordination with clients and consultants.

Relevant Projects:
• Crestline Library, Crestline, CA
• Northwestern RIVCO Animal Shelter, Jurupa Valley, CA
• Highland Police Station, Highland, CA
• Thermal Fire Station, Thermal, CA
• Lake Elsinore City Hall & Cultural Center, Lake Elsinore, CA Role In The Firm:

Project Manager,
Associate
Experience:

Since 2003
With STK:

Since 2005
Education:

Bachelor of Architecture
Woodbury University,
San Diego, 2003

Saeng’s
experience includes
Fire Stations, Animal
Shelters, Juvenile
Detention Facilities,
Park Projects and
numerous T enant
Improvements.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

SHAWN LOTHROP, CEO
As CEO and Structural Engineer of Record on many ISE projects, Shawn plays an integral role in developing and maintaining the company’s presence as a trusted industry trade partner. He has over 20 years of successful structural design experience, 15 of which have been invested working with public projects. He has designed with most material types including sustainable LEED rated products and is a respected expert in the industry.

While his public project experience is invaluable, also worth noting is the experience and insight he brings from other segments of the industry, providing “out of the box” solutions to the varied challenges that public project buildings can present. Shawn is an expert in true “value engineering” and having the foresight to detect potential construction conflicts ahead of time has given our clients a greater sense of confidence in our services. Shawn's broad project experience includes, educational buildings, hospitality, civic buildings, parking
structures, multifamily, foundation/building retrofit, and more.

In addition to his CA SE License #S5627, he also holds licenses in 25 other states across the U.S.

Shawn has served as a guest speaker at universities and industry association events. He is active in his local community, giving back and providing mentoring to the next generation of building industry professionals.

Licensing:

California Professional Structural Engineer
License # CA-S 5627

California Professional Civil Engineer
License # CA-C 66069
Education:

BS, Civil Engineering
Structural Emphasis
Cal State Long Beach
500+ hours continuing education

Civic Project Experience:

Desert Hot Springs City Hall and Council Chambers - 13,000 sf single story structure General Contractor: RC Construction, Inc.

Architect: STK Architecture, Inc.

Apple Valley Public Works Facility - Administration Building & Maintenance Building - 20,000 sf Architect: Adrian Gaus Architects, Inc.

County of Riverside - Mead Valley Community Center - 40,000 sf two story structure General Contractor: AWI Builders
Architect: TKE Engineering, Inc.

City of Riverside - Hunt Park Community Center - 20,000 sf single story structure Architect: Matlock & Associates
City of Redlands Data Center - 3,000 sf subterranean structure Architect: Bonney Architects.

Design West Engineering

EXPERIENCE
Design West, 2002
In Industry, 2002

REGISTRATION
California PE #M33209
ASHRAE
ASPE

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in
Mechanical Engineering
California Polytechnic
State University,
Pomona

STEVEN JOHNSON, PE
Senior Mechanical Engineer
Steven Johnson joined Design West Engineering in 2002 and now directs the Mechanical and Plumbing Department. He ensures that each project manager is maintaining the quality of design and level of service that Design West is known for.

He manages and oversees mechanical and plumbing design teams of every type and for every sector of the industry, including K-12, higher education, municipal, and healthcare to name a few. After Steven joined Design West, he quickly proved himself a competent and successful Project Manager and in 2007 took over the responsibility of managing the day to day production for his department from the founding Principals. Mr . Johnson also oversees the fire sprinkler design team, the commissioning and LEED consulting division, the BIM team with the BIM Manager reporting directly to him, and applications of our Energy Division. He is passionate to see forward thinking design implemented into our projects with the most up-to-date technologies. Energetic and resourceful, he brings to his job an unparalleled knowledge of the industry and complete dedication to his clients.

Steven has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.

FEATURED PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
911 Dispatch HVAC Assessment - Rialto
Senior Mechanical Engineer. Review of the San Bernardino County 911 Dispatch facility located at 1771 Miro Way, Rialto, CA in which Design West developed solutions to the heat load issues the facility was experiencing.

Niland Public Safety Building
Senior Mechanical Engineer. Complete MEP design for a building of 7,500 SF.

Building includes Apparatus Room for three vehicles, living area for the Fire Department, offices, restrooms and a community area for the public.

El Camino Real Park in Orange
Senior Mechanical Engineer. Complete M&P design for the restroom and community buildings for the city park. Scope included the remodel of an existing restroom building, new construction of a restroom building, an approximate 2,400 square foot community building and an approximate 2,900 square foot restroom and concession building.

City of Cabazon Fleet Services Facility
Senior Mechanical Engineer. M/P design for two new buildings, one including the service building and office area, and the second building included the vending and toilet rooms.

Eastvale Community Center
Senior Mechanical Engineer. M/P design for a 30,000 square foot community center facility including a 10,500 square foot gymnasium room, plus multi- purpose room, offices, and lobby.

Additional City of Rialto Experience
City of Rialto Playhouse
Code Enforcement Office Remodel
Public Works Department Remodel
Police Department Evidence Building
Racquetball and Fitness Center
Finance Building
Police Department Generator
Park Modifications

Design West Engineering

EXPERIENCE
Design West, 2005
In Industry, 1995

REGISTRATION
California PE #E19480
LEED AP BD+C
IESNA Board Member
IEEE

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in
Electrical Engineering
Arizona State University
(in progress)
LEO MAYA, PE, LEED AP BD+C
Senior Electrical Engineer
With over 25 years of design and project management experience, Leo Maya has worked on a wide array of projects including large commercial and industrial buildings, health care and institutional facilities, data centers, sports field lighting, street and area lighting, golf course electrical systems, custom residences, and various dry utility designs. Mr . Maya joined the Design West team in 2005 and in 2009 took over the responsibility of running the electrical production. Apart from standard electrical and lighting design, he oversees the electrical BIM design team; solar photovoltaic design; specialized analyses including arc flash, coordination studies and load flow evaluation; all low voltage applications including fire alarm, security, data and signal, and A/V systems. His continuing education in the field of the electrical engineering and lighting design, along with his membership and board position for the IESNA (Illuminating Engineers Society of North America) keep him up to date with the latest lighting and energy efficient technologies.

Beyond his technical prowess, it is Mr . Maya’s dedication to maintaining long- term client relationships and his diverse background that have made him such a valuable asset to the Design West team. This dedication to customer service is evident in the work ethic and the character displayed by his whole team.

FEATURED PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
911 Dispatch HVAC Assessment - Rialto
Review of the San Bernardino County 911 Dispatch facility located at 1771 Miro Way, Rialto, CA in which we developed solutions to the heat load issues the facility was experiencing.

Niland Public Safety Building
Senior Electrical Engineer. Complete MEP design for a building of 7,500 SF.

Building includes Apparatus Room for three vehicles, living area for the Fire Department, offices, restrooms and a community area for the public.

City of Coachella Corporate Yard
Senior Electrical Engineer. Upgrades to existing Corporate Yard for a new generator incorporated in the existing building main switchgear and addition of new HVAC equipment on existing building.

Vista Hermosa Park in San Clemente
Senior Electrical Engineer. New 6,000 square foot aquatic center building and sports lighting for 3 baseball fields, 6 soccer fields, a football field, and design for a 147kW solar photovoltaic system.

City of Fontana Photovoltaic Systems
Senior Mechanical Engineer. Electrical plans and specifications for the design of PV systems at 7 sites for the City of Fontana. The total carports for the project is 735.42 kW with the rest being rooftop systems at 389.30 kW . Total project is 1124.72 kW .

Additional City of Rialto Experience
City of Rialto Playhouse
Code Enforcement Office Remodel
Public Works Department Remodel
Police Department Evidence Building
Racquetball and Fitness Center
Finance Building
Police Department Generator
Park Modifications

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

PROJECT REFERENCES
“Mr. Salts and his outstanding staff have
always been a pleasure to work with and they
are extremely responsive, knowledgeable,
personable and very reasonable in their
approach to projects. STK’s full rounded
knowledge of commercial and specialty
design is noteworthy and their LEED status
is important for energy efficient construction
design in today’s age.”
Greg Bacon,
Senior Project Manager, Special Districts
“The City of Highland has been working with
STK Architecture for many years with great
success. The STK team has always maintained
a professional attitude while delivering
outstanding service. I would recommend
STK Architecture to anyone looking for an
architectural firm.”
Joseph Hughes,
City Manager, City of Highland
Contacts:

Charles Maynard City of Desert Hot Springs
1999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, CA
92240
415.720.2660
M. Rene’ Glynn San Bernardino County
PMD
385 N. Arrowhead Ave.

Third Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415
909.771.1223
Dominick Riverside County
Lombardi Facilities Management
3133 Mission Inn Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
951.955.6622
Jim Richardson City of Highland
27215 Base Line
Highland, CA 92346
909.864.6861
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

SPECIFIC APPLICABLE PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Statement of Qualifi cations:

The STK Team has served several City and County clients on as-needed (on-call) contracts. A ma- jority of these Clients have extended multiple and repeat contracts to our team, indicating that the technical and professional skills necessary to successfully deliver such services are not just ad- equate, but exemplary.

The average longevity for staff in architectural fi rms is 18 months. The average longevity of the STK staff is over 10 years; meaning, the people who performed the exemplary services mentioned above, are the very people who will serve you on your projects. The specifi c experience of our staff is direct- ly applicable and relevant to Rialto's requirements, and is local to Southern California.

STK has conducted business since 1969. Combined, our staff has over 100 years experience pro- viding services for public works clients, and the fi rm has over ten years experience providing on-call services for multiple public clients.

As demonstrated above, our team provides quantifi able evidence that STK has tangible and verifi able experience and knowledge to provide exceptional service for the City of Rialto. Please contact the references, below, with any questions regarding our technical, professional, or service performance.

Applicable Project Experience
Community Building, Athletic Center, Therapy
Pool, Park, Snack Bar, Library ELC, Corporate
Yard, Fire Station, EEA, Roof Repair
City of Highland
Jim Richardson
909.864.6861
[email protected]
City Hall, Park Pool, Police Station, Fire
Stations
City of Desert
Hot Springs
Charles Maynard
415.720.2660
[email protected]
Learning Center, Shooting Range San Bernardino
County PMD
M. Rene' Glynn
909.771.1223
[email protected]
Correctional Facility, Library, Justice Center Riverside County FM
Dominick Lombardi
951.955.6622
[email protected]
Brawley Fire Station, Police Station Addition City of El Cajon Yazmin Arellano
619.441.1785
[email protected]
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

SAN BERNARDINO PMD PROJECTS
STK has successfully completed the following projects as part of “on-call” professional services contract for County of San Bernardino PMD Department in the last 5 years.

Project Completion Date
Mentone Fire Station #12, Structural Evaluation 3/3/2017 Del Rosa Head Start, Structural Assessment 3/3/2017
Waterman Gardens Head Start, Structural Assessment 3/3/2017 Redlands Sun Head Start, Structural Assessment 3/3/2017 Calico Ghost Town Roof Repairs 4/7/2017
175 W. 5th St. Roof Recoating 4/7/2017
Youth Justice Center Roof Replacement 4/7/2017
Glen Helen Gun Range Backstops 6/5/2017
Glen Helen Fire Department, New Metal Building 6/12/2017 Needles Library, Roof Replacement 6/12/2017
900 Gilbert Street Landscape Improvement 8/8/2017
Yucaipa Regional Park, ADA Restroom & Picnic Shelters 9/11/2017 Devore Fire Station Feasibility Study 10/20/2017
Redlands Museum, ADA Remodel Project 10/24/2017
Glen Helen B-Block Shower Repairs 10/25/2017
Chino Dairy Farm Demolition 12/18/2017
Rialto Ave. Residence Demolition 12/18/2017
SB Probation Tattoo Removal Facility 1/4/2018
John Rains House Museum, Building Evaluation 2/5/2018
Agriculture Weights and Measures 2/15/2018
Lucerne Valley FS #8, Bunk House Addition 4/1/2018
222 Building Remodel 5/31/2018
West Valley Regional Training Center 7/1/2018
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

SAN BERNARDINO PMD PROJECTS
Project Completion Date
Devore Fire Station/ Clearwater Feasibility 7/13/2018
Fire Station #96, Fawnskin, Architectural Schematic Design 8/3/2018 Barstow Probation Building Improvements 9/1/2018
Yucaipa Park Special Event Entry 9/15/2018
Chino Dairy Farm Demolition, Revise Demo Plan 9/30/2018 Glen Helen Gun Range Restrooms 10/15/2018
Rodman Tower Antenna 11/30/2018
Calico Ghost Town, Roof Repairs 12/3/2018
F.S. #91, Lake Arrowhead, Office, Security Remodel 4/30/2019 John Rains House Museum Vineyard, ADA Restrooms 6/30/2019 Devore Fire Station, Cost Estimate 9/3/2019
F.S. #14, Wrightwood, CA ADA Restroom, Fire Pole 10/1/2019 Baker Fire Station #53, Bedroom & Training Room 12/19/2019 Rancho Cucamonga Modular Bldg. 3/25/2020
San Bernardino County Museum Basement ADA Ramp 3/12/2020 Chino Airport Sewer Connection 7/1/20
Chino Airport Administration Building, ADA Restroom Upgrade 7/1/2020 Barstow Child Care Parking Lot 8/3/2020
San Bernardino County Museum Handrails 9/1/2020
Chino Airport Hangar Restroom 10/2/2020
San Bernardino County Museum Entry Beautification 11/3/2020 Weights and Measures, Entry Lobby Remodel 11/3/2020
Yucaipa Regional Park, ADA Restrooms 11/3/2020
Yucaipa Regional Park, ADA Fish Platform 11/3/2020
Yucaipa Regional Park, ADA Playground 11/3/2020
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Project Completion Date
Yucaipa Regional Park, Tent Shelter 11/3/2020
Devore Fire Camp 6 Showers & Restrooms 12/4/2020
Fire Station #163 Upland, Bathroom Renovation 1/4/2021
Guasti Regional Park, ADA Upgrade 3/1/2021
Yucaipa Regional Park, ADA Upgrades 4/2/2021
Redlands Museum Climbing Structures 4/2/2021
Ontario Maple Head Start Pre-School, Interior Fencing & Courtyard 4/2/2021 Probation Fontana Secure Parking Lot Expansion 5/4/2021 Gilbert Street Complex, Vehicular Wayfinding 5/20/2021
Rancho Yard New Building Design 8/2/2021
Pre-School Services, Cooley Dr. 8/13/2021
Ontario Maple Head Start Pre-School, Fencing and Gate Pending West Valley Probation Gun Range Pending
San Bernardino 20 Fire Station Assessments Pending
Guasti Fishing Pier, Path of Travel & Picnic Canopy Accessories Pending Yucaipa Regional Park, Pool ADA Upgrades Pending
Prado Regional Park, Mallard ADA Updates Pending
Rancho Courthouse Water Isolation Valves Pending
SBC Fire Station #226 Pending
Yorba-Salughter Families AdobeP Pending
Prado Regional Park, Gate House Pending
Prado Regional Park, Monument Sign Pending
5 ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

SAN BERNARDINO PMD PROJECTS
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] M. Rene Glynn, 909.771.1223, [email protected] SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PMD, 385 N. Arrowhead Ave., Third Floor, San Bernardino, CA 9241

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS
OCEANSIDE FIRE STATION NO. 1
Project Details for
Oceanside Fire Station No. 1
City of Oceanside
602 Civic Center Drive
Oceanside, CA 92054
Contact:

Brian Thomas, Director of Public W orks
760.435.507 4
[email protected]
Project Architect/Manager: G. V . Salts
Scope: Programming through C. A.

Square Footage: 30,322 S.F.

Completion Date: April 2022
Construction Cost: $18 Million
Project description:

Fire Station No. 1 is located adjacent to the City of Oceanside’s City Hall and was influenced by Irving Gill’s design of the first fire station 1 for Oceanside in 1929.

The station houses five bays for emergency vehicles, complete fire department administrative services, emergency operations center, and training/ meeting rooms.

The second floor contains the living quarters for 14- fire personnel with kitchen, dayroom, laundry facilities and provides for future expansions as the City grows.

The site amenities include an above ground fuel tank, emergency backup generator system, covered parking electronic rolling gate and an exterior exercise area. 42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Project Details for Highland Police Station:

Contact: Jim Richardson, Public W orks Manager, 909.864.6861, City of Highland, 27215 Base Line, Highland, CA 92346 Construction Costs: $9 Million
Highland Police Station has achieved LEED Silver Certification.

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

HIGHLAND POLICE STATION
The City of Highland Redevelopment Agency, in
conjunction with the Riverside County Sheriff’s
Department, contracted STK to research, pro-
gram, design and document a new police station
for the Highland Police Department. Located on
Baseline near the civic center in Highland, the
30,000 S.F. facility (plus independent storage
building) accommodates the forecasted needs
of the Police Department for 20 years. The site
housed the existing Police Department building,
which was demolished after completion of the
new station.

Features of the new Highland Police
Station include:
• Accommodations for Traffic, Detective and
Patrol divisions
• Emergency operations control center
• Evidence processing and storage
• Armory
• Shower, locker, fitness and sleeping facilities
• Public meeting rooms
• Monitored holding and interview rooms
• Accessible and centralized support stations
and administration
• State of the art compact storage systems
• Separate accommodations for victims,
suspects and parolees
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Project Details for Desert Hot Springs City Hall:

City of Desert Hot Springs
11999 Palm Drive,
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240
Contact: Chuck Maynard, City Manager (Retired)
Phone: 415.720.2660
Scope: Annex to the existing City build. The new Annex
contains Council Chambers, City Manager’s Office and City Services Departments.

Project Architect: T ony Finaldi
Project Manager: Jaisaeng Namvong
Designer: Roberto Rubini
Square Footage: 13,089 S.F.

Construction Cost: $5.1 Million

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

DESERT HOT SPRINGS CITY HALL
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

LAKE ELSINORE CITY HALL & CULTURAL CENTER SEISMIC RESTORATION Project Details for Lake
Elsinore City Hall & Cultural
Center Seismic Restoration:

City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Contact: Peter Ramey, 909.855.1720
Construction Cost: $2 Million
The Cultural Center
was originally con-
structed in 1923 as a
Methodist Church. The
building is three stories
tall. The lower level
was once used as a
general meeting room
and was complete with
a kitchen and stage.

The Main Street level
is seven steps above
the sidewalk that allows
for a grand entrance
into what once was the
main worship area. The
upper level contains a
choir loft on one end
of the church and on
the opposite end is
the pastor’s quarters
and the organ room.

The City acquired the
property in the late 80’s
and has been using
it as a museum on its
lower level and for city
council meetings on the
main worship level.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] The building is constructed using load bearing hollow clay block units. These clay blocks are both unreinforced and very brittle. The building was assessed by the city’s structural engineer and it was calculated that the lateral load carrying capacity of the clay blocks was dangerously close to collapse if another strong earthquake was to occur within the vicinity. The danger with the clay blocks is that they will resist a load until the load exceeds the yield point.

Once the yield point is exceeded the block almost explodes apart.

As a result the building could experience catastrophic collapse once the blocks’ yield point is exceeded. The roof deck and the floors are constructed of wood dimensional lumber. The roof and floors are minimally tied structurally to the block walls. The lower level, since it is mostly underground, is constructed of poured in place concrete. Overall the building is in excellent condition with almost no termite / dry rot damage to the lumber.

It was the city’s goal to seismically reinforce this building with the end result being first to save lives and second to prevent to- tal collapse. The city hired a structural engineer that specializes in seismic retrofit projects and hired STK to assist in the project management / historical preservation of the building. The struc- tural reinforcement system consists of large foundations in the lower level along with poured in place concrete shear walls from the lower level to the roof deck. The concrete shear walls are tied together with large tube steel framework that not only transfer load between the shear walls but also support the block exterior walls.

Essentially the seismic retrofit consisted of constructing a concrete and steel framework on the inside so that the exterior bearing walls no longer carry the entire building load. The city also decided that since this is still an assembly occupancy, a fire sprinkler system would be a wise investment in safety.

The main challenge for the project’s construction was how to con- struct this heavy duty interior framework with out destroying most of the building’s interior along with the historic artifacts contained in the lower level. This type of precision work could only be handled by a crew of experts that are more akin to construction surgeons than carpenters. All areas that required access were carefully de- molished while salvaging as much of the architectural finishes as possible. The concrete shear walls and tube steel were all carefully fitted and installed by hand one piece at a time so that little of the existing finishes were destroyed.

STK provided the following
services for this project:
• Architectural drawings for
the reconstruction of the
demolished finishes
• Assist owner with bidding
and bid evaluation
• Review product submittals
and architectural shop
drawings
• Review and process RFI’s
from contractor
• Review and provide opinion
for change orders
• Attend weekly construction
meeting between engineer,
contractor and owner
• Review construction project
schedule and progress
• Review payment applications
• Review project closeout
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

LAKE ELSINORE CITY HALL & CULTURAL CENTER SEISMIC RESTORATION

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

LAKE ELSINORE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
This renovation project involved repur-
posing a 30-year old Riverside County
Sheriff’s Station into a neighborhood
community center.

Improvements included restroom
upgrades, flooring, paint, ADA acces-
siblility, landscaping, ADA parking, new
doors and energy efficient windows.

The center hosts summer and after
school programs. Room designs in-
clude special spaces for teens and tod-
dlers, with appropriate sized restroom
facilities. New playground equipment
encourages children to extend their
play time into the outdoor environment.

Project Details for Lake Elsinore Neighborhood
Center:

City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Contact: Gus Papagolos, 951.764.2417
Construction Cost: $365,000
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

BAKER FAMILY LEARNING CENTER
This 11,576 S.F. project consists of a public
library branch with a multipurpose room and
adjacent preschool. The library space requires
flexibility for the interior space, public computer
access, a children’s computer area and a public
meeting room. The multipurpose room includes a
kitchen for future meal programs. The preschool
serves a maximum of 32 children and requires
outdoor play space.

The main goal of the owner is to provide these
spaces in a LEED Silver certified building while
adhering to a strict budget. Building construction
consists of metal cold formed framing at walls,
wood roof trusses and standard concrete founda-
tion. Exterior wall finishes are primarily cement
plaster and fiber cement sided. The building
design has both flat roofs with parapets and low
slope metal roofs with a high SRI rating.

The design team has worked hard to provide
a sustainable, energy efficient building while
staying within budget. The project has a high
R-value building envelope, high SEER rated
HVAC units and low water use fixtures and
landscape. Solar panels are included to insure
lower future electrical costs.

Project Details for Baker Family Learning Center:

San Bernardino Co. PMD, 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Third Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92415 Contact: M. Rene’ Glynn, Project Manager, 909.771.1223
Baker Family Learning Center has achieved LEED Silver Certification. 42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] After the seismic upgrade was per-
formed on this structure, the City
wished to convert the choir loft into a
“Class A” conference room. (See be-
fore and after photographs.)
The design services included full inte-
rior/material finishes. We incorporated
two 5 foot flat screen televisions with
internet/tele-conference capabilities.

We also designed a small service
counter with refrigerator/dishwasher
and sink.

Stained oak shutters, replacement
windows, oak crown molding and cus-
tom conference table completed the
design.

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM
Project Details for Lake Elsinore Cultural Center
Conference Room
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Contact: Jason Simpson, 951.67 4.3124
Construction Cost: $350,000
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS

HIGHLAND CORPORATE YARD
The Highland Corporate Yard is a 20,000 S.F. municipal
material and vehicle storage yard with administration ser- vices located in Highland, CA. The project program includes office spaces (including conference room, kitchen and bath facilities), and a variety of storage spaces: temperature controlled, weather protected, building material storage pits, open bays and covered truck parking bays.

The corporate yard is part of a larger complex developed by City of Highland and designed by STK Inc. consisting of ath- letic center and swimming pool, community park and public library and environmental learning center.

Project Details for Highland Corporate Y ard:

Contact: City of Highland, Jim Richardson, Public W orks Manager 27215 Base Line, Highland, CA 92346, 909.864.6861
Construction Cost: $6.8 Million
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Project Details for
1000 V an Ness Theatre and Mixed Use Center:

Construction Cost: $15 Million

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS
1000 VAN NESS THEATRE AND MIXED-USE CENTER
This remodel project to convert
an urban Cadillac dealership -
a multilevel, historic building in
downtown San Francisco - to an
80,000 SF entertainment cen-
ter, including 14 movie theatres
on seven levels, posed a lot of
health, exiting and aesthetic
challenges.

This urban building, configured
for vertical retail, was to be
converted to a multi-use enter-
tainment and restaurant center.

Challenges included structural
forensics, hazardous investiga-
tions, enormous staging and
phasing problems and practical
and configuration challenges.

Due-diligence studies included
structural investigation, MPE
data gathering and investiga-
tion, historical considerations,
forensics and infrastructure
studies of the existing building.

Creative structural solutions
allowed stadium risers within
the auditorium shells, multiple
stacked auditoriums, smoke
management, extensive life
safety and exit studies and a
complex security system in a
tough city environment.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Project Details for Northwest Riverside
County Animal Shelter:

Dept. of Animal Services, County of Riverside
6851 V an Buren Blvd.

Jurupa V alley, CA 92509
Contact: Josh Sisler, Chief of Operations
Desk: 951.358.7627 Cell: 951.377 .2057
[email protected]
Construction Cost: $23.4 Million
This 60,000 S.F. animal shelter facility serves
the City of Riverside and the unincorporated
areas of Riverside County. The project program
includes 34,000 S.F. administration and clinic
building along with 10 individual animal kennel
bungalows. The total complex has the capacity to
house 550 dogs, 350 cats, 10 horses and other
miscellaneous animals.

The project is designed as a campus with a
possibility of flexible spaces and possible future
addition of 3 to 4 bungalows.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

NORTHWESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER
Rosetta Canyon Park is a 25-acre, $10 M community park that includes 5 softball/baseball diamonds, 240 parking spaces, concession (commercial/restroom building) with upper deck viewing area to all five diamonds, one football field, tot-lot, dog park, community garden and a 70' high clock tower that hides an AT&T cell tower. “Sports Capital of the World” is the theme of the park. The park is located in the middle of a new development of single family homes and apartments.

Project Details for Rosetta Canyon Park Phase 2:

Rosetta Canyon Park is a 25-acre, $10 M community park.

Awarded the “Park and Recreation Project of the Y ear” Outstanding ASCE Award, 2017 APW A/IE Small Project of the Y ear Award, 2017
Contact: Gus Papagolos, City of Lake Elsinore, 951.764.2417 42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

ST A TEMENT OF QUALIFICA TIONS
ROSETTA CANYON SPORTS PARK PHASE 2

PART THREE:

Bidding and Construction Support
Bidding
• Constructability
• Respond to questions
• Claim avoidance reviews
• Preparation of bid documents/
advertisements
• Issuing addenda
• Pre-bid meetings and job-walks
• Bid evaluation support
Construction
• Contract award assistance
• Pre-construction meetings
• RFI, ASI, IB, Shop Drawing Review,
Submittal Review, Construction
Observation, Field Reports
• Communication documentation
and dissemination
• Post-Construction
• Full construction administration support
including as-built documents, close-out
books with warranty information, training
manuals and on-site document archives

SCOPE OF WORK

METHODOLOGY
PART ONE: Programming and Pre-Design
• Public Meetings, Client Meetings,
User Meetings
• Coordinate with team
• Investigate/ research
• Research and characterize existing site
and buildings
• Available utilities
• Operational requirements
• Work with staff/ community/ users who will
provide space and programming information
and parameters.
• Program
• Refine purpose, function and scope
Based on input, describe the following:
• Physical requirements
• Ambiance
• Aesthetic Character
• Establish and define specific areas,
purposes, size, operations, and space
• Address electronic and technological
building needs
PART TWO: Spec’s And Engineering
A and E Design and Document Services:
• Architectural, Structural, Mechanical,
Electrical, Plumbing Design,
• Engineering and support services
• Civil and Landscape as necessary for
site adaptation
• FF&E Support
• Approvals and permits
• Plan check
• Presentation to City staff/ City Council/
Planning/ Public
• Cost Estimation and Value analysis
Administrative Services:
• Project Management
• Coordination
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Progress Presentations
• Inspiration Study Boards
• Adjacency Diagrams
• Material Study Boards
• Rendered Elevations
• 3D Form Studies
Progress presentations evolve naturally out of
the charrettes and information gathering that
take place during the programming process. The
products are preliminary, informal and quickly
produced, as necessary, to convey information.

Presentations to Committees and Boards
• Presentation Boards
• PowerPoint Presentations
• Model
Formal presentations reflect concepts and pa-
rameters that were previously approved by the
client. The possibility of some change still exists
after this level of presentation.

Presentations to The Community,
Council and Commissions
• Refined Presentation Boards
• Refined PowerPoint Presentations
• Refined Model
Final presentations reveal to the community and
larger user groups the final solution to the design
problem and document the project for marketing
and posterity.

SCOPE OF WORK

METHODOLOGY
Emerging Issues: Building Information Modeling (BIM) allows the designer to develop buildings with a three-dimensional, true-attribute approach that closely resembles the thought processes used in construction. STK is uniquely suited to such techniques due to the fact that a high level of technical knowledge is necessary to implement the modeling system. 42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM
Principal and Project Manager Involvement: Every project at STK is carried through from inception to completion by the principal-incharge and the project manager. STK employs experienced, long- term personnel (the average employee longevity at STK is over 10 times the national average for architecture firms) who understand the architectural process, take full responsibility for their work, and coordinate thoroughly and proactively with sub-consultants.

Quality Control Procedures: STK enforces two systems of quality assurance prior to the release of plans in which the documents are meticulously and methodically reviewed and coordinated to avoid errors, conflicts, mis-references, omissions, readability and constructability. Using these systems, each element of the construction documents is tested and cross referenced in a systematic order so that mistakes and oversights are minimized to the greatest degree possible.

In addition, STK has implemented a company policy of meeting with sub-consultants prior to the submission of each progress set in order to assure clear communication, circumvent coordination issues, and to personally monitor the quality of the design package as a whole.

When it is possible, depending on the construction delivery method, STK welcomes constructability and value engineering input from the contractors and construction specialists. We have found that an amicable, team effort between the construction contractor, the owner, and the design team produces the best building products.

SCOPE OF WORK

METHODOLOGY

DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
Results Of STK Quality Control Program: STK Inc. has produced excellent results with our in-house quality control program, as indicated by our low change order percentages and by the number of projects we are awarded by return clients. The standard of the industry for change order percentages is approximately 5%. STK has an overall change order percentage of less than 1%, with several projects less than 1/2%. Currently, over 75% of our projects are with return clients.

Process For Compliance With Project Schedule: STK emphasizes the use of detailed schedule documents with regular progress updates to complete work on time. An outline schedule is pub- lished as one of the initial tasks of the project. Updates and added detail are implemented often and regularly to identify and correct “slips” in the time line. 42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected]

REFERENCE PROJECT
RIALTO FIRE STATION 205
This project was master planned into
a two phase project so fire services
could be provided faster to the south-
ern portion of the City. Phase 1 in-
cludes a $3.9 Million, 3 1/2 acre site
with a 4-bay apparatus, site improve-
ments for a training tower, 2 modulars
(classrooms), above ground fuel tank,
generator and motorized security
gates. Site improvements include 8”
thick concrete paving, 6’ high masonry
security walls, LED site lighting and all
underground utilities.

Phase 2 includes a $3.2 Million, 7,000
S.F. 2-bay fire station. The station has
two offices, kitchen, dayroom, patio,
exercise room, restrooms and five
sleep quarters. The apparatus has
rapid bifolding doors, tail pipe exhaust
system, extractor and SCBA system.
42095 Zevo Dr., Suite A15, T emecula, CA 92590 • 951.296.9110 • www.stkinc.com • [email protected] Project Details for Rialto Fire Station No. 205:

Rialto Fire Department
131 South Willow Avenue, Rialto, CA 92376
Contact: Cory Cisneros, Battalion Chief, 909.644.6379
Date of Services: 2016-2022, Y ear Completed: 2022, A/E Services: $556,249, Construction Costs: $7 M

B-1
E

XHIBIT B

FEDERAL CONTRACT TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND REGULATIONS
As used in this Exhibit B , this Agreement may be referred to as the “contract,” and Consultant may be referred to as “contractor.” In performing its Work under the Contract, Contractor must conform to all applicable federal, state, and local codes, laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which will have full force and effect as though printed in full in the Contract. In addition to the terms, conditions, performance obligations, and other requirements set forth in the Contract, Contractor must comply with the following federal contract terms, conditions, and regulations, which are incorporated by reference in the Contract:

1. Equal Employment Opportunity. Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, all contracts that meet the definition of “federally assisted construction contract” in 41 CFR Part 60–1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60–1.4(b), in accordance with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity” (30 FR 12319, 12935, 3 CFR Part, 1964– 1965 Comp., p. 339), as amended by Executive Order 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and implementing regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.”
41 CFR 60–1.4(b) provides:

The applicant hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction Work, or modification thereof, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary of Labor at 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid f or in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, or undertaken pursuant to any Federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, the following equal opportunity clause:

During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action will include, but not be limited to the following:

Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in B-2
conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision will not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.
(4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of Workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or Workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and must post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
(5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
(6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscriminati on clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of B-3
September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulat ion, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance:

Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or i s threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

The applicant further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction Work: Provided, That if the applicant so participating is a State or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in Work on or under the contract.

The applicant agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance.

The applicant further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the applicant agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the applicant under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has B-4
been received from such applicant; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.

2. Davis– Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141– 3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non– Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis –Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141–3144, and 3146–3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non–Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non– Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts mus t also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti –Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public Work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non– Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

3. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701– 3708). Where applicable, all contracts awarded by the non–Federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Under 40 U.S.C. 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard Work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard Work week is permissible provided that the Worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours Worked in excess of 40 hours in the Work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction Work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to Work in surroundings or under Working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence.

4. Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement . If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR § 401.2 (a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research Work under that “funding agreement,” the B-5
recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency.

5. Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C . 7401–7671q.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251– 1387), as amended. Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 must contain a provision that requires the non– Federal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251– 1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

6. Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) . A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government - wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549.

7. Byrd Anti–Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) . Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non –Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non–Federal award.

8. 2 CFR § 200.322 Procurement of Recovered Materials. .A non– Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.

B-6

9. Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements. The parties to this Contract agree to comply with the provisions of 43 CFR 18, New Restrictions on Lobbying, including the following certification requirements:

In accordance with 43 C.F.R. § Part. 18, Appendix A, each of the parties to this Contract certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the parties, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection wi th the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the parties must complete and submit Standard Form–LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The parties must require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients must certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification must be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

10. Executive Order 13513 of October 1, 2009, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving. Text Messaging While Driving by Government Contractors, Subcontractors, and Recipients and Subrecipients. Each Federal agency, in procurement contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements, and other grants to the extent authorized by applicable statutory authority, entered into after the date of this order, must encourage contractors, subcontractors, and recipients and subrecipients to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving company-owned or - rented vehicles or GOV, or while driving POV when on official Government business or when performing any Work for or on behalf of the Government. Agencies should also encourage Federal contractors, subcont ractors, B-7
and grant recipients and subrecipients as described in this section to conduct initiatives of the type described in section 3(a) of this order.

11. Drug-Free Workplace (2 CFR §182 and §1401) . The Department of the Interior regulations at 2 CFR 1401 —Government-wide Requirements for Drug- Free Workplace (Financial Assistance), which adopt the portion of the Drug- Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 et seq., as amended) are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract. By entering into this Contract, the Contractor agrees to comply with 2 CFR 182.

12. Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 U.S.C. 874). Contractor agrees to comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR part 5).

C-1

EXHIBIT C

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION

STK ARCHITECTURE, INC.

HOURLY AND REIMBURSABLE RATES

February 2022

Principal ............................................. $237/Hr Associate .............................................. 171/Hr Project Manager ................................... 149/Hr Senior Draftsperson ............................. 105/Hr Junior Draftsperson ................................ 88/Hr Administration......................................... 66/Hr Consultants ................................... Cost x 1.15 Reimbursables ............................. Cost x 1.00 Reimb. Agency Fees ..................... Cost x 1.05

Updated:

1. Rates for Structural Engineering Design Services:

1.1 Owner/Principal Engineer per hour

1.2 Project Manager per hour

1.3 Design/Field Engineer per hour

1.4 Drafter per hour

1.5 Clerical per hour

1.6 Drive Time per hour

1.7 Meetings not included in Section 2 Billed Hourly

1.8 Expenses:

Printing/Airfare/Rental Car/Lodging Cost + hourly rate
The following are rates for structural engineering design services per the master contract agreement.

These rates expire on date listed above.

February 14, 2022
Hourly Rate Schedule - Structural Engineering Design Services Hourly Rates
Item # Staff Rate
$110
$255
$155
$125
$100
$90
ISEengineers.com

Principal Engineering ......................................................................... $215.00 per hour

Mechanical & Plumbing Engineering
Senior Engineer, Mechanical ............................................................ $195.00 per hour Mechanical Project Manager ............................................................ $150.00 per hour Mechanical Designer ......................................................................... $115.00 per hour Mechanical CAD Draftsperson ............................................................ $95.00 per hour

Electrical Engineering
Senior Engineer, Electrical ................................................................ $195.00 per hour Electrical Project Manager ................................................................ $150.00 per hour Electrical Designer ............................................................................. $115.00 per hour Electrical CAD Draftsperson ................................................................ $95.00 per hour

Commissioning Services
Director of Commissioning Services....................................... $195.00 per hour Commissioning Agent.............................................................. $150.00 per hour Commissioning Engineer........................................................... $115.00 per hour

Energy Services
Director of Energy Services Engineering .......................................... $195.00 per hour Energy Services Engineer .................................................................. $150.00 per hour Energy Services Designer .................................................................. $115.00 per hour

Fire Protection Engineering
Senior Engineer, Mechanical ............................................................ $195.00 per hour Fire Protection Project Manager ....................................................... $150.00 per hour Fire Protection Designer .................................................................... $115.00 per hour

Utility Coordination
Senior Engineer ................................................................................. $195.00 per hour Project Manager ................................................................................ $150.00 per hour Utility Coordinator .............................................................................. $115.00 per hour CAD Draftsperson ................................................................................ $95.00 per hour

Low Voltage Engineering
Senior Engineering, Electrical ........................................................... $195.00 per hour Low Voltage Project Manager ........................................................... $150.00 per hour Low Voltage Designer ........................................................................ $115.00 per hour

Clerical Support ................................................................................... $75.00 per hour

***Rates effective Jan. 1, 2018
Y our Partners
in Mechanical,
Electrical,
Plumbing,
Commissioning,
Fire Protection,
Technology,
& Energy.
2022 RATE SHEET
412 E. Vanderbilt Way | San Bernardino, CA 92408
Southern California 909.890.3700 | Pacific Northwest 425.458.9700 | DesignWestEng.com