Cities Index.
Attachment 2 - CC Staff Report for TM 20199.pdf

Rialto City Council
May 10, 2022

Document
Attachment 2 - CC Staff Report for TM 20199.pdf
Meeting
May 10, 2022
Body
Rialto City Council
Original file
238 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

City of Rialto
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #: Version: 120-0749 Name:

Status:Type: Agenda Item Approved
File created: In control:10/14/2020 City Council
On agenda: Final action:11/10/2020 11/10/2020
Title: Request City Council to Conduct a Public Hearing to consider Adoption of (1) Resolution No. 7679 approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 2017-0001, which is a request to change the zoning designation of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land from Support Commercial (S-C) within the Central Area Specific Plan to Multi-Family Residential (MFR) within the Central Area Specific Plan, (2) Resolution No. 7680 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 2018-0007 (TTM 20199), which is a request to allow the subdivision of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land into fifty-six (56) single-family lots and four (4) common lots, and (3) Resolution No. 7681 approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment Review No. 2018-0099) prepared for the project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
(ACTION)
Sponsors:

Indexes:

Code sections:

Attachments: 1. Exhibit A - Location Map, 2. Exhibit B - Zoning Exhibit, 3. Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map No. 20199,

4. Exhibit D - Site Plan, 5. Exhibit E - Neighborhood Meeting Documents, 6. Exhibit F - Planning Commission Staff Report, 7. Exhibit G - Planning Commission Resolution No. 19-27, 8. Exhibit H - Planning Commission Resolution No. 19-28, 9. Exhibit I - Planning Commission Resolution No. 19-29,

10. Exhibit J - Initial Study, 11. Exhibit K - Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program, 12. Exhibit L - Draft Resolution for EAR No. 2018-0099, 13. Exhibit M - Draft Resolution for SPA No. 2017-0001, 14.

Exhibit N - Legal Description, 15. Exhibit O - Draft Resolution for TTM No. 2018-0007 Action ByDate Action ResultVer.

City Council11/10/2020 1
For City Council Meeting [November 10, 2020]
TO: Honorable City Council
APPROVAL: Sean Grayson, Acting City Manager
FROM: Karen Peterson, Acting Community Development Director Request City Council to Conduct a Public Hearing to consider Adoption of (1) Resolution No. 7679 approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 2017-0001, which is a request to change the zoning designation of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land from Support Commercial (S-C) within the Central Area Specific Plan to Multi-Family Residential (MFR) within the Central Area Specific Plan, (2) Resolution No. 7680 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 2018-0007 (TTM 20199), which is a request to allow the subdivision of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land into fifty-six (56) single- family lots and four (4) common lots, and (3) Resolution No. 7681 approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment Review No. 2018-0099) prepared for the project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (ACTION)

BACKGROUND
City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 1 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
Applicant
RBV Investment Group, LLC, 625 Fair Oaks Avenue, #115, South Pasadena, CA 91030 Location
The project site consists of four (4) parcels of land located at the southeast corner of Willow Avenue and Bonnie View Drive (APNs: 0131-021-36, -37, -38, & -39) (Refer to the attached Location Map ( Exhibit A)).

Surrounding General Plan Land Use Designations
Location General Plan Designation
Site Residential 21 (12.1 - 21.0 du/acre)
North Downtown Mixed-Use (6.1 - 60.0 du/acre)
East Downtown Mixed-Use (6.1 - 60.0 du/acre)
South Residential 12 (6.1 - 12.0 du/acre)
West Residential 12 (6.1 - 12.0 du/acre)
Surrounding Zoning Designations
Site Characteristics
The project site is a relatively flat, rectangular-shaped piece of land comprised of four (4) parcels.

Altogether, the project site is approximately 4.54 gross acres in size with approximate dimensions of 990 feet (east-west) by 200 feet (north-south). The entire project site is vacant and covered by natural grasses and shrubs.

Surrounding Area
To the north of the project site, across Bonnie View Drive, is a self-storage facility and approximately

2.55 acres of vacant land planned for a 38-unit affordable housing apartment complex and a public parking lot. To the east is a 3,422 square foot fast food restaurant building, and to the south is a tract of single-family residences built in 1978.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION
Project Proposal
RBV Investment Group, LLC, the applicant, proposes to develop the 4.54 gross acre project site into a private residential neighborhood consisting of fifty-six (56) detached single-family dwelling units, private streets, recreational amenities, and landscaping. The project includes changing the zoning of the project site from Support Commercial (S-C) within the Central Area Specific Plan to Multi-Family Residential (MFR) within the Central Area Specific Plan, and the subdivision of the project site into fifty-six (56) single-family lots and four (4) common lots for the private streets and recreational City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 2 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
fifty-six (56) single-family lots and four (4) common lots for the private streets and recreational amenities.

Entitlement Requirements
The following entitlements are required:
· Specific Plan Amendment: Per Section 18.78.060 of the Rialto Municipal Code, the proposal to change the zoning of the site from Support Commercial (S-C) within the Central Area Specific Plan to Multi-Family Residential (MFR) within the Central Area Specific Plan requires approval of an amendment to the Central Area Specific Plan. · Tentative Tract Map: Per Section 17.16.040 of the Rialto Municipal Code, the proposed subdivision of land requires approval of a tentative tract map. · Precise Plan of Design: A Precise Plan of Design application will also be required for review and approval by the Director of Community Development for the design of the residential units and related site improvements (amenities, walls, landscaping, etc.).

Specific Plan Amendment No. 2017-0001
Per Section 2 (Permitted Uses) of the S-C zone, single-family residences are not permitted on the project site. However, the site’sunderlying Residential 21 land use designation does allow for the development of residential projects on the project site with a density ranging from 12.1 dwelling units per acre to 21.0 dwelling units per acre. It is uncertain why the zoning designation and the land use designation are inconsistent with each other in this case. Nevertheless, in order to address the discrepancy and to accommodate the proposed development, the applicant filed a specific plan amendment application to change the zoning designation of the project site to MFR.

The MFR zone and the applicant’sdevelopment proposal are consistent with the surrounding zoning designations and land uses. For example, as shown in the attached zoning exhibit (Exhibit B), the land immediately adjacent to the south of the project site is similarly zoned MFR and developed with single-family residences. Meanwhile, the 2.55 acres of vacant land to the north of the project site is zoned Increased Density Residential (R-X) and contains entitlements to develop a 55-unit affordable housing apartment complex. The proposal to develop 56 detached single-family dwelling units on the project site will provide a buffer between the lower density single-family dwellings to the south and the high-density apartment complex planned to the north.

Furthermore, under the current S-C zoning, the project site can only accommodate the development of various commercial services and/or retail uses. Willow Avenue and Bonnie View Drive are each collector streets and are not known for the type of traffic needed to support a commercial development. Without frontage on a major arterial street, such as nearby Riverside Avenue, it is unlikely that the project site will develop into a viable commercial project anytime in the near future.

For these reasons, the Planning Commission supported the applicant’srequest to change the zoning designation of the project site to MFR to accommodate residential development.

Tentative Tract Map No. 2018-0007 (TTM 20199)
The applicant filed a tentative tract map application to subdivide the project site into fifty-six (56) single-family lots, one (1) private street lot, and three (3) recreational amenity lots (Exhibit C). Lot sizes for the new single-family lots range from approximately 1,408 square feet to 3,338 square feet, with an average lot size of about 1,835 square feet. The lots have depths between 57 feet and 98 City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 3 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
feet, and widths between 22 feet and 55 feet.

Density
As proposed, the residential neighborhood will have a density of 12.33 dwelling units per acre, which is significantly less than the 21.0 dwelling units per acre maximum density allowed by the Residential 21 land use designation and the MFR zone.

Neighborhood Site Layout
According to the site layout (Exhibit D), the applicant will construct twenty-eight (28) single-family dwelling units in a row along the northern boundary of the project site, and another twenty-eight (28) single-family dwelling units within six (6) motor courts distributed along the southern boundary of the project site. The neighborhood will have two (2) access points - one (1) driveway connected to Bonnie View Drive that will allow full access in and out of the neighborhood and one (1) driveway connected to Willow Avenue that will provide access to emergency vehicles only. The primary access point off Bonnie View Drive, known as Belloro Drive from hereon, will feature significant amounts of landscaping, decorative paving, and neighborhood identification signage. Internally, Belloro Drive will connect to a twenty-six (26) foot wide east-west private street, known as Bonita Drive from hereon. Bonita Drive will provide direct access to the garages of the twenty-eight (28) single-family dwellings on the north side of the project site and to six (6) motor court alleys on the south side of the project site. The six (6) motor court alleys will provide direct access to garages of the remaining single-family dwellings.

Parking
The proposed site layout shown in the tentative tract map will accommodate sufficient parking for the project. Parking within the new neighborhood will come in the form of garage spaces and perpendicular spaces within the internal private street system. In total, the neighborhood will contain 141 parking spaces for the 56 dwelling units, with 112 of the parking spaces enclosed within garages.

This quantity exceeds the minimum parking requirement as shown in the parking calculation chart below and as required by Section 3(O) of the MFR zone, which requires two (2) parking spaces within an enclosed garage for each single-family dwelling and one (1) guest parking space for every ten (10) dwelling units in total:

Open Space
The proposed tract map will include sufficient area for three (3) recreational amenity lots. The first recreational amenity lot, located at the southwest corner of the project site, will feature a playground, landscaping, and benches. The second recreational amenity lot, located slightly east of the center of the project site, will feature a swimming pool, spa, and landscaping. The third, and final, recreational amenity lot, located at the southeast corner of the project site, is a dog park featuring artificial turf, City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 4 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
amenity lot, located at the southeast corner of the project site, is a dog park featuring artificial turf, decomposed granite paving, benches, and landscaping. Including the amenities and the private yards of each single-family lot, the total amount of open space area provided throughout the neighborhood is 49,481 square feet, which far exceeds the minimum requirement of 22,400 square feet.

Development Review Committee
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the project on October 3, 2018. The DRC recommended approval of the project subject to the applicant revising the design. The DRC required a re-alignment of the motor courts to place an amenity lot near the primary entrance for visibility, the incorporation of an additional elevation style, and the incorporation of sidewalks that lead from the private streets to the gates of each private yard to facilitate the maneuverability of the trash cans.

The applicant incorporated all of the revisions required by the DRC into the current set of project plans.

Economic Development Committee
The Economic Development Committee (EDC) reviewed the project on October 11, 2017 and again on January 31, 2018. At its first meeting, the EDC directed staff and the applicant to conduct a neighborhood meeting to introduce the project to the surrounding community. At its second meeting, the EDC expressed general support and directed the applicant to file the necessary applications.

Neighborhood Meeting
On November 16, 2017, the Planning Division held a neighborhood meeting regarding the project, as directed by the EDC. The meeting took place in the Council Chambers at City Hall located at 150 S.

Palm Avenue. Staff mailed flyers to all two-hundred (200) property owners within 300 feet of the project site. One (1) resident attended the meeting. The flyer, attendance sheet, and comment card received are included as Exhibit E. The sole attendee expressed opposition to the project. The main issues of concern centered on the density of the project and the resultant increase in vehicular traffic that the project would generate. Staff and the applicant addressed the comments at the meeting by explaining that the applicant proposes a density close to the minimum allowed by the current Residential 21 land use designation, and that the applicant will prepare a traffic study, which will determine the appropriate mitigation necessary, if any, to reduce traffic impacts to a level of insignificance.

Transportation Commission
Crown City Engineers, Inc. prepared a project-specific Traffic Impact Study (TIS), dated November 30, 2018, to assess potential impacts to local streets and intersections. The Transportation Commission reviewed and approved the TIS on August 7, 2019. The TIS indicates that the project will generate approximately 530 daily passenger car trips, with 41 AM peak hour trips and 56 PM peak hour trips. The traffic study determined that each of the four (4) intersections analyzed in the study would continue to operate at or above acceptable levels of service upon completion of the project without the need for any mitigation.

The project will complete half-width street improvements along the project frontages of Bonnie View Drive and Willow Avenue. Additionally, the applicant will pay development impact fees related to traffic. All street improvements and development impact fee payments must be paid and/or completed prior to occupancy.

Planning Commission
On May 29, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered oral and written City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 5 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
On May 29, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered oral and written testimony for Specific Plan Amendment No. 2017-0001, Tentative Tract Map No. 2018-0007 (TTM 20199), and the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment Review No. 2018-0099). After consideration, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 (2 absent) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. The staff report from the May 29, 2019 meeting and the adopted Planning Commission Resolutions are attached (Exhibits F - I).

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
California Environmental Quality Act
The applicant engaged Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning to prepare an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment Review No. 2018-0099) to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Initial Study is attached to the agenda report (Exhibit J). Based on the findings and recommended mitigation within the Initial Study, staff determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Staff published a Notice of Intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project in the San Bernardino Sun newspaper, mailed copies to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site.

Staff also completed a Notice of Completion and distributed copies of the Initial Study to the State Clearinghouse. A twenty (20) day public comment period took place from April 24, 2019 to May 13, 2019. The City received no public comment letters during the public comment period.

Although the Initial Study indicates that the project could present a significant effect with respect to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise, any potential impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the implementation of the mitigation measures included within the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit K).

Native American Tribal Consultation (Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18) In accordance with California Assembly Bill 52 and California Senate Bill 18, the Planning Division mailed notices to ten (10) Native American tribes informing them of the project and allowing them to request consultation on the project. The tribes were given ninety (90) days, from January 21, 2019 to April 20, 2019 to request consultation on the proposed project. One (1) tribe, The Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (Kizh Nation), requested formal consultation during the period.

Planning staff conducted formal consultation with Chairman Andrew Teutimez-Salas and Matt Teutimez of the Kizh Nation on May 9, 2019. The topics discussed included a basic background of the project and the anticipated construction activities. During the consultation, Chairman Teutimez- Salas requested the ability to place a certified Native American Monitor on-site during all ground disturbance activities. The Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 2018-0007 (TTM 20199) includes a Condition of Approval requiring the applicant to coordinate with the Kizh Nation to allow access during all ground disturbance activities.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:

The General Plan land use designation of the site is Residential 21. This designation permits the development of residential projects on the project site with a density ranging from 12.1 dwelling units per acre to 21.0 dwelling units per acre. The project involves a proposal to develop a private residential neighborhood with a density of 12.33 dwelling units per acre, which is therefore consistent with the Residential 21 land use designation. Additionally, the project is consistent with the following goals of the Land Use Element of the Rialto General Plan:

City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 6 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
Goal 2-19: Encourage neighborhood preservation, stabilization, and property maintenance.

Goal 2-21: Ensure high-quality planned developments in Rialto.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney reviewed and approved the Staff Report and accompanying Resolutions.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Operating Budget Impact
The applicant will annex the project into Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 with an estimated rate of approximately $312 per residential unit ($17,472 at build-out) annually to ensure that the project does not negatively impact the General Fund, and that the project pays its fair share for Public Safety and other City services. In addition, the applicant will pay an estimated $287,750 in one-time plan check, planning and permit fees. See the table below.

Capital Improvement Budget Impact
The applicant will bear the full capital cost of construction of the project and the required infrastructure improvements. No City funds will be used to construct the project, but prior to completion of the project, the applicant will be required to pay approximately $1,570,000 in development impact fees to the City, as shown in the table below.

Fee Capital Operating Total
Development Impact Fees $1,570,000 - $1,570,000
Building Plan Check / Permit Fees - $165,000 $165,000
Planning Fees - $12,750 $12,750
Engineering Plan Check / Permit Fees - $110,000 $110,000 One Time Fee Revenues $1,570,000 $287,750 $1,857,750
Business License
Prior to construction, the applicant will submit a contractors list to the Business License Division, and each contractor listed will obtain a business license.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council Conduct a Public Hearing to consider:
· Adoption of a Resolution (Exhibit L) approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment Review No. 2018-0099) prepared for the proposed project and authorization of staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Clerk of the Board of San Bernardino County; and · Adoption of a Resolution (Exhibit M) approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 2017-0001 to change the zoning designation of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land, described in the legal description attached as Exhibit N, from Support Commercial (S-C) within the Central Area Specific Plan to Multi-Family Residential (MFR) within the Central Area Specific Plan, subject to the findings and conditions therein; and
· Adoption of a Resolution (Exhibit O) approving Tentative Tract Map No. 2018-0007 (TTM 20199) to allow the subdivision of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land into fifty-six (56) single-family City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 7 of 8
powered by Legistar™
File #: 20-0749, Version: 1
to allow the subdivision of approximately 4.54 gross acres of land into fifty-six (56) single-family lots and four (4) common lots, subject to the findings and conditions therein.

City of Rialto Printed on 4/29/2022Page 8 of 8
powered by Legistar™

← All documents from this meeting