March 08, 2023
Art Cervantes
Engineering Manager
Engineering Services Department
City of Rialto
150 S. Palm Avenue
Rialto, CA 92736
RE: Locust Avenue Widening and Reconstruction (Locust Avenue from Riverside Avenue to Casmalia Street)
Dear Art:
We are pleased to submit our scope of services and fee proposal to provide engineering services for the Locust Avenue Widening and Reconstruction from Riverside Avenue to Casmalia Street. The following background, scope, fee and schedule are based upon the review of the Street Overlay & Reconstruction project final construction plans bid schedule E prepared by Advanced Civil Technologies (ACT) dated Oct 6, 2022 and the discussed items during our discussion meeting on Feb 3, 2023.
Background
Bid schedule E includes the following street segments:
1. Locust Avenue from Riverside Avenue and Casmalia Street (1.7 miles)
2. Linden Ave from Riverside Ave and Casmalia St (1.3 miles)
3. Summit Ave from Maple Ave to Apple Ave (0.6 miles)
4. Lilac Ave from Slover Ave to Maywood Ave (0.9 miles) Bid schedule E was originally part of the Street Overlay & Reconstruction project where schedules A, B, and C were awarded. Bid schedule E has locations requiring additional street widths and right of way. Since some areas can be widened within the public right of wayand others may require right of way acquisition, City Council requested to move forward with the street widening ahead of the 5-year CIP schedule. Locust Avenue was recently identified as a truck route which will require pavement section analysis with the new and higher traffic index (TI).
Locust Avenue between Riverside Avenue and Casmalia Street is classified as a secondary arterial.
It is a two-lane roadway with one travel lane in the north and south direction. Left turn and right turn lanes exist on Locust Avenue at Riverside Avenue and Casmalia Street. The existing right of way widthvaries from 63’ to 100’. Curb to curb/edge of pavement width varies from 23’ to 64’.
Based on the typical street section standard for secondary arterial per city standard plan no. S-100, the right of way width from curb curb shall be 88’ and 64’ respectively. The secondary arterial shall include a 12’-wide parkway with 6’-wide sidewalk on each side and 12’-wide raised median/left PAGE 2 OF 20
turn/two way left turn lane along the centerline. The City has requested that Locust Avenue have one 12’-wide parkway with 6’-wide sidewalk on the west side, one 14’ southbound through lane, one 12’ southbound through lane, one 14’ raised median/left turn lane/two way left turn lane, one 12’ northbound through lane, one 14’ northbound though lane, and one 12’ wide parkway with 6’- wide sidewalk on the east side.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (805) 701-9427 or through email at [email protected] or Ricky Chan at (310) 980-7704 or through email at [email protected].
Sincerely,
MARK THOMAS
Darin Johnson, PE
Division Manager
PAGE 3 OF 20
Scope of Work
1. Project Management/Administration
1.1 Project Management
Mark Thomas will plan, organize, direct and monitor project work activities and resources in accordance with contracted scope, schedule and budget. This task includes performing ongoing general project management with the CITY, subconsultants and stakeholders including preparing contract paperwork, memos, letters and e-mails, making phone calls and maintaining project files. This activity commences with receiving the Notice -To- Proceed, continues through submittal of key final project deliverables. For this scope of work, we assume a project duration of 24 to 26 months months, not including right of way acquisition and construction.
1.2 Meetings
There will be a Project Development Team (PDT) created for this project which will include representation from the design team, CITY staff and key stakeholders. We will begin with a project kick-off meeting to be sure of a mutual understanding of the intended purposes, objectives, milestones and deliverables of the project. At the project kick-off meeting we will distribute a master Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule as a draft for review by the PDT. The draft CPM schedule will then be updated using comments received from the PDT. The CPM schedule will be updated at major project milestones, prepared using Microsoft Project software.
Meetings will be centered around key project milestones. We will conduct the meetings; this includes preparation and distribution of the meeting agenda, arrangement of attendance of meeting participants, preparation and distribution of meeting minutes, and the recap of actions to be taken prior to the next meeting. This scope assumes a total of five (5) PDT meetings that are anticipated to be scheduled for major milestone submittals, including the project kick-off.
1.3 Coordination with Subconsultants and Agencies
Mark Thomas will perform ongoing project coordination with the CITY, subconsultants, and other agencies. We will maintain project files, preparing memos, letters, e-mails and phone calls necessary to manage the project.
1.4 CPM Schedule, Progress Report and Budgets
The draft CPM schedule included in this proposal will be updated, incorporating comments received from the PDT. The CPM schedule will be updated and prepared for discussion at each progress meeting.
PAGE 4 OF 20
1.5 Quality Control Plan
Mark Thomas will prepare a Quality Control Plan that consists of established procedures for performing the work including methods for design calculations, establishing appropriate levels of design development for intermediate submittals, identification of required plan checks (who, what, when), design checklists, and methods of project documentation. As part of the QA/QC program, checklists will be used to assure that all aspects of the project have been adequately reviewed for quality. As the design phase proceeds, the regularly scheduled reviews will help the team identify and evaluate issues that may affect the project.
DELIVERABLE(S): Project Management, PDT Meetings (assumption of five (5) meetings), Meeting Agenda and Minutes (electronic), Monthly Status Reports (electronic), Monthly Invoices, Quality Control Plan
2. Survey
2.1 Research/Mobilization
Mark Thomas will research and assemble available record data from San Bernardino County, and the City of Rialto Public Records including, Recorded Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Records of Survey, Corner Records and City and County Centerline maps and/or Field Book References. This task includes initial site reconnaissance and up to two (2) field walks to review existing site conditions, document design items and finalize design survey strategy.
2.2 Control Survey
Mark Thomas will perform a field survey to establish the control necessary for the project area. Project horizontal control (NAD83) and vertical control (NAVD88) will be established based upon GPS ties to the CSRC network, California Coordinate System 1983 (CCS83), Zone VI, Epoch 2017.5 for horizontal and vertical. Additional local benchmarks from the City of Rialto and the County of San Bernardino will also be verified, for elevation control and confirmation. Mark Thomas will include control points in the Electronic Base Map which will include coordinates and elevations used for each point.
2.3 Design Topography
Mark Thomas will perform Mobile Terrestrial LiDAR Scanning of the project corridor and up to three (3) adjacent parking areas as defined by Engineering in the original scope of the project. From the LiDAR scan data Mark Thomas will extract and compile a topographic base map of the project corridor and create a surface complete with break lines, to be used for design. Mark Thomas will supplement the scan data with additional field survey data collection in areas designated by engineering and will also include storm drain and sewer manhole dips within the project corridor up to five (5) additional PAGE 5 OF 20
days of field work will be included in this task.
DELIVERABLE(S): Project Topographic Base Map derived from field data (AutoCAD Civil 3D) , LandNet Base Map (AutoCAD Civil 3D), Survey Control Report – for horizontal and vertical control, Survey field notes and site photos
3. Utility Coordination and Potholing
3.1 Data Compilation/Site Visit
Mark Thomas will contact Dig-Alert to secure an official ticket with contact information of all known utilities within our project limits. Record request forms will be sent to all utility owners requesting as-built facilities and available record plans.
Upon compiling as-built information from utility owners, Mark Thomas will conduct a site visit to identify all existing improvements shown on the as-builts to verify their accuracy and note facilities such as manholes and valves that are identified in the as- built plans, but not visible in the field. These conditions will be flagged and sent to our project survey team. Additionally, follow up discussions with the Utility Owners will occur for these cases in the event past improvement projects inadvertently paved over the manhole/valve covers.
3.2 Utility Conflict Mapping/Utility Relocation and Agreements
Mark Thomas will utilize as-built data and utility maps obtained by the utility companies to prepare existing utility base mapping and identify all utilities on the plans that are within the project limits. The utility mapping developed for the PS&E will be verified through topographic surveys. We will assist the CITY with Utility Conflict Mapping, including the typical “ABC” process of utility letters, which includes:
• Utility “A” Letter: The Utility “A” Letters (record request forms) will be sent to each utility to request as-built mapping of their facilities as previously discussed in Task 3.1 above.
• Utility “B” Letter: Maps showing the utility mapping and the proposed improvements will be sent to the utility companies for verification. • Utility “C” Letter: Final plans, along with a letter, will be sent to the utility companies showing the existing utilities and the final design.
During the design development, critical High and Low risk facilities will be identified, and a Utility Conflict Matrix will be developed to record the findings and begin the coordination with the utility owners. We assume all utilities within the existing right of way appear to be in by franchise agreement and utility agreements are assumed to be not necessary as compensation from the CITY to utility owners to relocate is not anticipated, nor will privately owned water/sewer relocations be performed by the CITY PAGE 6 OF 20
other than manhole/ valve cover adjustments. Mark Thomas will provide all correspondence/communication efforts to the CITY upon completion of the final design.
There is a potential relocation of the Edison power poles on both sides of Locust Avenue.
Mark Thomas will take the lead to coordinate this utility relocation with the assistance of Monument. A utility agreement is assumed to not be necessary for the Edison Power Poles as noted in the above scope and all relocation costs are assumed to be Edison’s responsibility.
3.3 Utility Potholing
In areas such as where proposed catch basins and RCP laterals are proposed, potholing will be utilized to locate utilities to mitigate potential conflicts. Upon completion of all pothole services, the project survey team will be notified to field survey each potholed location. It is assumed that a maximum of ten (24) potholes will be utilized for this project and have been included in this scope of work.
DELIVERABLES: Records Obtained from the CITY and Outside Agencies, Utility mapping shown on the base mapping, Certified List of Utilities per USA, Utility Conflict Mapping Procedure (“ABC” Letters), twenty-four (24) Utility Pothole Results and Report, Edison power pole relocation coordination (all relocation design and construction costs are Edison’s responsibility).
4. Geotechnical Analysis
4.1 Geotechnical Analysis and Report
Geocon, our subconsultant, will perform and obtain subsurface soil information within the vicinity of the proposed project on Locust Avenue in the City of Rialto. We are proposing the following scope of work:
• Mark the core locations and notify Underground Surface Alert of Southern California to mark any subsurface utility locations near our proposed excavation locations.
Additionally, Mark Thomas/CITY would provide Geocon plans depicting the locations of all utilities in the project area.
• Prepare no fee City of Rialto encroachment permits for our work. • Excavate, sample, and log pavement cores within the existing pavements, at approximate intervals of 500 linear feet with adjustments made for different pavement surfaces, distress and lane conditions. Excavations will be logged in accordance with USCS criteria and samples will be collected for laboratory testing.
Excavations will be backfilled with native soils and capped with asphalt cold patch.
We have budgeted 18 cores within locust in one 2-day mobilization. We will also utilize the existing core data (1 core) from the Leighton report along Locust Avenue. • Provide traffic control during our field work. We have budgeted 2 days of unmanned traffic control signage for our work within the multi-lane Locust Avenue. • Perform laboratory testing which is anticipated to include maximum density/optimum moisture, in situ moisture and density of subgrade, and R-value.
PAGE 7 OF 20
The final laboratory test program will depend on the soil conditions encountered during the investigations.
• Prepare a geotechnical pavement investigation report which will include a discussion of the pavement, aggregate base, and subgrade conditions encountered, laboratory test results, and provide pavement rehabilitation (if appropriate) and repaving options for the subject roadways.
Advantec, our subconsultant, will calculate the Traffic Index ( TI) value using the daily vehicle classification count. Advantec has performed the daily vehicle classification count for the 2022 City Wide Truck Route Study dated November 4, 2022. Geocon will use the TI and R-value from the laboratory test to analyze the existing pavement condition and develop different repaying options.
DELIVERABLE(S): Draft/Final Geotechnical Pavement Report and Traffic Index (TI).
5. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study and Water Quality Management Plan
5.1 Draft and final Hydrology and Hydraulic Study
Prior to the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study, Mark Thomas will meet with the CITY’s maintenance personnel to understand the existing drainage conditions and concerns.
One site visit and 2 meetings are anticipated.
Mark Thomas will prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study and Report for the CITY.
The report shall include both off-site and on-site hydrologic calculations to recommend any drainage improvements needed per the proposed project modifications and improvements. Focus of the effort is on the street flows specific to the catch basin relocations.
Calculations and recommendations shall conform to the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual, and City’s Storm Drain Design Manual, if applicable.
Assumptions:
• Any upgrades, if deemed necessary, to the existing mainline storm drain are limited to the project limits.
• Additionally, study area is limited to the project site specific to the relocation of the existing drainage inlets
5.2 Draft and Final WQMP
Mark Thomas will prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the City of Rialto. The project proponents will address post-construction urban runoff and stormwater pollution from new development and significant redevelopment projects that quality as Category 3 projects. Low Impact Development Best Management Practices to the maximum extent practicable will be incorporated.
PAGE 8 OF 20
Calculations and recommendations shall conform to the San Bernardino Water Quality Manual Plan for the Santa Ana Watershed requirements.
DELIVERABLE(S): Site Visit (1), Meetings with CITY’s Maintenance Personnel (2), Draft/Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Study, and Draft/Final Water Quality Management Plan
6. Environmental Approval
6.1 Modified Phase I ESA
To complete this task, GEI, our subconsultant, proposed to complete the following:
• Modified Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in accordance with ASTM E1527-21; and
• Preparation of a Modified ESA report for the property.
A Modified Phase I ESA will be prepared for an approximate 1.7-mile section of North Locust Avenue between North Riverside Avenue and West Casmalia Street in the City of Rialto, California. Modifications to the Phase I ESA include limiting the search area to the adjoining properties that have frontages on North Locust Avenue. The estimated search area is approximately 250-feet on either side of North Locust Avenue.
The Modified Phase I ESA will be performed according to good commercial and/or customary standards and practices, as defined according to the ASTM Standard Practice, with the purpose of identifying evidence for the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicated an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of these materials on the property, into any structure on the property, or into the subsurface of the subject property. GEI’s inquiry will include interviews with knowledgeable parties, review of reasonably ascertainable historical property records, reviews of federal, state, and local government records for environmental concerns, and a site inspection. The discussion of the findings of inquiries, along with conclusions and recommendations, will be contained in a report suitable for characterizing relative environmental risks for commercial purposes.
The scope of work of the Phase I ESAs does not include testing of soils, groundwater, air, underground tanks, radon levels, asbestos, lead in paint, or drinking water, etc. If the potential for significant contamination by hazardous or toxic substances is indicated or observed, then testing (Phase II) may be helpful in defining the nature and extent of such contamination.
GEI is prepared to begin performance of the Phase I ESA services within one week of the date when written authorization is received. The Phase I ESA report will be completed and delivered electronically within four weeks of the site visit and/or site work. The PAGE 9 OF 20
schedule will be subject to the timely delivery of information to be provided by the client and is subject to the access to the property by the owner.
If additional services are required in support of this project (i.e., meetings, site investigations, preparation of additional reports, etc.), they will be completed on a time- and-material basis with prior client consent.
6.2 CEQA Compliance
Implementation of the proposed capital improvements would complete or “fill-in” the existing improvements along this section of Locust Avenue, with the proposed project contributing to aesthetic, public safety, and improved access/circulation objectives for the area. For projects not anticipated to have a significant effect on the environment, the CEQA Guidelines (Sections 15300 to 15332) identify a list of (up to 33 types) activities that may meet the definition of a Categorical Exemption (CE). An initial review of the list indicates that the proposed project roadway improvements may be processed as a Class 1 or a Class 2 exemption, which applies to projects that involve replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.
GEI proposes preparation of a CE and a Notice of Exemption (NOE) using the template provided in Appendix E of the CEQA Guidelines. The NOE would include a brief description of the project, the location of the project, a finding that the project is exempt, citations to the exemptions that are being relied upon, an explanation of why the project qualifies for the exemption(s). Information used in the determination would be obtained based on desktop research of readily available databases and literature sources, review of aerial photographs, and the use of screening tools.
Local biological resource databases, a cultural resources records search from the South Central Coastal Information Center, a preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessment (Task 1, above), and a completed Initial Study Checklist will also be used to support the CE.
GEI assumptions include the following:
• One round of review and revisions.
• Use of existing database and literature sources.
• No field surveys or technical reports.
• Consultation with federal agencies is not included.
• City would be responsible for posting NOE with County Clerk. • GEI will be provided a GIS/CADD based design file of the proposed project.
Should further review of the design plans or preparation of the CE for this project, result in the identification of a potentially significant impact to an environmental resource, as described by the CEQA Guidelines, GEI will immediately notify CITY and the project team to discuss solutions PAGE 10 OF 20
or next steps for the environmental phase. Additional steps may require the preparation of a mitigated negative declaration or additional CEQA compliance activities.
DELIVERABLE(S): One electronic file of the Modified Phase I ERSA report, completed CE and NOE
7. Preliminary Design Conceptual Plans
7.1 Preliminary Design Conceptual Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare conceptual level plans (30%) for the proposed project showing roadway widening, proposed typical sections, existing and proposed right of way, curb returns/ramps, curb & gutter, sidewalk, parkway, driveways, and striping.
DELIVERABLE(S): Preliminary Design (30%) Plans (4 sheets)
8. Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
8.1 Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
Mark Thomas will prepare a set of plans for the proposed improvements. The CITY will review plans at 65%, 90%, and Final. Final plans shall be submitted on full size (24” x 36”) Mylar. Mark Thomas will prepare the project technical specifications for the proposed improvements for the CITY’s review with the 65%, 90%, and Final plan submittals. The technical specifications shall be prepared in Word in a CITY approved format and include the bid schedule. The CITY will provide the front-end/boilerplate bid documents, contract, and general provisions. Final specifications with bid documents will be submitted in Word and PDF formats.
Mark Thomas will provide an engineer’s estimate of probably construction costs with the 65%, 90%, and final plan submittal. The estimate shall be prepared in Microsoft Excel and include sufficient bid items, as approved by the CITY, for contractors to properly bid on the scope of work. The scope of work for this task include the following:
• Title Sheet (1)
• Sheet Index (1)
• Construction Notes (1)
• Typical Sections (1)
• Utility Plans (8)
• Demolition Plans (4)
• Horizontal Control Plans (2)
• Plan and Profile (8)
• Drainage Sheets (9)
• Construction Details (6)
• Signing and Striping Plans (4)
• Traffic Signal Modification Plans (1)
• Total: 46
DELIVERABLE(S): 65%, 90%, and Final Plans. 65%, 90%, and Final Bid Schedule and Technical Specifications. 65%, 90%, and Final Engineer’s Estimate.
PAGE 11 OF 20
9. Right of Way
The City of Rialto is planning to widen Locust Avenue from Riverside Avenue to Casmalia from two lanes to four lanes. As a result, the project will require the acquisition of additional right of way at several locations along this segment of Locust Avenue to accommodate the proposed street improvements. Based upon the preliminary design plans, there are a total of 28 separate parcels that have been identified for a partial acquisition varying in width between 1 to 15 feet. There are an additional 9 properties that only require temporary access to reconstruct and conform existing driveways to the new roadway improvements. Therefore, it is anticipated that up to 37 parcels will be affected by the Project which are identified in Attachment A. This does not include the acquisition of any utility easements that may be required in connection with the relocation of any facilities that are determined to be in conflict with the Project.
Monument, our subconsultant, proposes a two-phased approach for the acquisition program consisting of a formal acquisition approach to secure the 28 partial acquisitions and a voluntary approach to obtain the access to the 9 properties requiring temporary rights. The formal acquisition process will include appraisal services, good faith negotiations, escrow coordination, and condemnation support in the event negotiations reach an impasse. The voluntary approach will involve the use of a Permit to Enter and Construct to secure temporary access for the City’s contractor to perform driveway reconstruction. Permits to Enter and Construct are common in situations where the proposed improvements are for the benefit of the property owner, in this case to reconnect the driveway, and are often obtained with nominal or no compensation.
The above approach complies with the Uniform Act and all applicable laws, regulations and procedures in the state of California. It is our understanding that the Project does not include the use of federal funds, nor will the Project involve Caltrans oversight.
9.1 Existing Right of Way
Mark Thomas will analyze the exiting record information obtained in Task 2.1 to verify existing centerlines together with the necessary field survey ties to locate sufficient monuments to verify the alignment and right-of-way of Locust Street. Mark Thomas will obtain and review Preliminary Title Reports (PTR), as well as review supporting documents provided by the City, for use in determining property lines and easements that may impact acquisition for the twenty -eight (28) parcels identified in our preliminary design review. An ODC amount of $1250 per PTR has been budgeted. It is assumed that sufficient monumentation will be in place and no material discrepancies between record monuments and field monuments will be found. Additional survey work required to satisfy Monument Preservation is not included in this scope, nor is a preconstruction Record of Survey, if a Record of Survey is required the client will be notified and addition scope and fee will be negotiated.
9.2 Plats and Legal Descriptions
Up to twenty-eight (28) plats and legal descriptions will be prepared and shall conform to California Land Surveyor’s Act requirements. Plats and legal descriptions will be PAGE 12 OF 20
submitted to the CITY for review and and one (1) round of comments and will be updated once based upon those comments. Additional rounds of review and revision will be performed as supplemental service.
9.3 Right of Way Engineering
Mark Thomas will analyze the title reports, record mapping, and found project control to establish existing street centerlines, rights of way, easements, and property lines of record using industry accepted boundary retracement practices. All resolved linework will be illustrated in an Existing Right of Way Base Map (Land Net) depicting found monuments/cadaster, pertinent notes on means/methods of retracement efforts, assessor’s parcel numbers, ownership of record, and measured bearings/ distances. The Existing Right of Way Base Map (Land Net) will serve as the basis in identification of property interests (right of way, TCE, etc.) necessary to construct the project.
Additionally, a preliminary right of way cost estimate will be generated that includes the partial acquisition cost, estimate potential loss of business good will and severance damages (if applicable), and consulting services.
9.4 Right of Way Project Coordination
Monument’s Project Manager and key staff will be responsible for the technical and administrative functions required to provide right of way services on the Project. The management team will plan, organize, supervise, coordinate, and administer the various elements of the right-of-way scope of work.
• Monument will meet with relevant parties regarding proposed Project to identify acquisition issues, and/or to discuss project status, procedural issues, budget, and schedules.
• Prepare and implement an effective Acquisition Management Plan to ensure the Project is delivered in the most efficient and effective manner and in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and procedures.
• Participate with in-person Project coordination meetings (up to three (3)) with the CITY and design team to communicate project updates, coordinate right of way issues and make recommendations to the CITY on policy development, risk mitigation and general project consultation.
• Participate in project related meetings, make public presentations to individuals and organizations and represent the CITY in presentations and public hearing on all matters pertaining to the acquisition process.
• Conduct research and analyses to support the goals and objectives of the Project. • Finalize all work product, provided services and prepare and deliver presentations to CITY staff and key stakeholders, as appropriate.
PAGE 13 OF 20
• Prepare a Construction Binder at the conclusion of the acquisition phase which will be included with the construction bid package. The binder will include copies of redacted property agreements and conveyance deeds and a summary table that itemizes specific construction obligations and limitations for each property. • Assist the City with any file audits.
9.5 Fee Appraisal
A fee appraisal will be prepared for 28 partial acquisitions referenced above in Attachment A: Monument and/or it’s appraiser will perform the following services:
• The appraisal will be prepared by individuals licensed with the State of California, Office of Real Estate Appraisers, as a Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Our appraisers both retain the requisite qualifications and experience necessary to competently complete appraisals in a competent and professional manner, in accordance to applicable laws and policies.
• Prepare the Notice of Decision to Appraiser letter for each property, advising the property owner of the proposed project, introducing the appraiser, enclosing an Acquisition Brochure describing the CITY’s acquisition process, and contract information to answer questions and concerns.
• The appraisal report will comply with laws that are applicable to the specific appraisal assignment and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). • Afford the property owner or the owner’s designated representative the opportunity to accompany the appraiser on the inspection of the property. • Perform an inspection of the subject property. The inspection should be appropriate for the appraisal problem, and the Scope of Work should address:
o The extent of the inspection and description of the neighborhood and proposed project area,
o The extent of the subject property inspection, including interior and exterior areas, o The level of detail of the description of the physical characteristics of the property being appraised (and, in the case of a partial acquisition, the remaining property). • In the appraisal report, identify the highest and best use. If highest and best use is in question or different from the existing use, provide an appropriate analysis identifying the market-based highest and best use.
• Present and analyze relevant market information.
• In developing and reporting the appraisal, disregard any decrease or increase in the fair market value of the real property caused by the project for which the property is to be acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for the project.
PAGE 14 OF 20
• Report the appraiser’s analysis, opinions, and conclusions in the appraisal report. • ‘Show-me’ or right of way staking has been exclude from this scope of work. Should the property owner or appraiser request staking , Mark Thomas would request additional work authorization prior to proceeding with the requested surveys.
9.6 Partial Acquisitions
Monument will provide right-of-way delivery services required for the CITY to purchase the 28 proposed partial acquisitions required for the Project.
Monument will provide the following services under the direction of the CITY staff:
• Provide the Acquisition and Negotiations Services to acquire the property interests required for the Project in a timely, efficient manner and at a reasonable cost. Work shall be performed in accordance with Caltrans and the City’s Policies and Procedures and applicable Federal, State and local regulations.
• Coordinate and manage the acquisition process with the CITY, legal counsel, design team, property owners, and tenants along with the title company, appraisers and other consultants to insure effective cross-discipline communications. • Review right-of-way plans, appraisal reports, title reports, appraisal maps and legal descriptions and all other pertinent documents.
• Prepare acquisition offer packages consisting of the CITY’s written purchase offer, appraisal summary statement, acquisition brochure, acquisition agreement, conveying instruments (Grant Deed, Permanent and/or Temporary Easements, etc.), Certificate of Acceptance, recommendation of Amount of Just Compensation, plat maps and legal descriptions, and Title VI Information.
• Monument’s acquisition agent will meet personally with each property owner to present the CITY’s purchase offer, explain the project design requirement and inform him or her of the CITY’s right-of-way acquisition process. • Negotiate personally in good faith with each property owner, his/her agent or representative and discuss appraisal and valuation of the property interests, gather information from the property for consideration and address any questions or concerns that may arise during the acquisition process. • Establish and maintain an acquisition file for each property owner or property interest acquired and maintain a file checklist pursuant to the City’s specifications. • As may be required to secure Right of Entry Agreements; licenses or permits from property owners for purposes of performing hazardous waste, archeological and other inspections.
• Promptly transmit executed documents (acquisition agreements, executed deeds, rental agreements, statements of information, offset statements, and the like) to the PAGE 15 OF 20
CITY for acceptance and processing. A report summarizing the pertinent information relative to the transaction will be included.
• Prepare and submit a Letter of Recommendation to the CITY for any proposed administrative settlements with property owners. The letter will include a chronology of the negotiation efforts, provide supporting evidence and documentation and an explanation of the benefits and rationale behind the recommendation. • Escrow Coordination - Coordinate opening of escrows with direction from the project manager, assist the escrow company in obtaining additional docume ntation as necessary to provide clear title to the CITY, supervise and review the closing of escrows, and review closing statements for completeness and accuracy. We will serve as liaison between the title company, escrow holder, and the CITY. Upon closing of escrow, tax cancelation letters will be prepared for City signature, as necessary, for fee interest acquisitions.
• Recommend condemnation action when negotiations have reached an impasse. The required justification will be submitted in writing to the CITY. Our primary goal will be to reach an acceptance of the offer with each property owner. We will work with the CITY in recommending solutions to achieve acceptance of the offer. • Eminent Domain Support – If requested, coordinate with CITY’s condemnation counsel, as required, to support the condemnation activities until the Resolution of Necessity is adopted and possession is granted by the courts. Litigation support after the hearing for the Resolution of Necessity, such as depositions, mediation appearances and expert testimony, can be provided on a time-and-materials basis. • Perform any other normal procedures and processes to implement the acquisition assignment and provide any other supporting information and/or correspondence required by the CITY.
• Provide bilingual acquisition agents, if necessary.
• Prepare all applicable forms, secure property owner’s approval and signature and submit the forms to the CITY for review and acceptance. • Upon completion of the acquisition process for each property or property interest, or at project completion, Monument will provide the CITY with the original acquisition file as well as electronic copy of files for future audit purposes.
9.7 Permits to Enter & Construct
Monument will perform the following services to secure temporary access related to the reconstruction of existing driveways on the 9 parcels identified in Attachment A. Access to these parcels will be pursued on a voluntary basis without the threat of condemnation.
• Establish and maintain complete and current ownership files in a form acceptable to PAGE 16 OF 20
the client.
• Obtain property profile, vesting deed and legal descriptions, if necessary, in sufficient detail to negotiate with property owners and other parties. • Prepare Permit to Enter & Construct Agreement and introductory letter for approval of client.
• Mail Permit to Enter & Construct package to property owner via regular and certified mail to address registered on equalized tax role.
• Follow-up with each property, either in person, mail and/or telephone, and respond to property owner’s questions or concerns regarding the project and request or Permit to Enter & Construct. Ongoing discussions will continue for 4 weeks until the Permit is either accepted or rejected by the property owner or the property has been unresponsive to repeated attempts.
• Maintain a diary report of all contacts made with property owners or representatives and a summary of the discussions indicating attitude of owners, problem areas, and other pertinent information. Copies of all applicable written correspondence will be maintained in files.
• Transmit executed Permit to Enter & Construct Agreements to client.
Acquisition Assumptions:
• The Project Manager will participate in up to fourteen (14) right of way coordination meetings.
• The Project does not anticipate or involve federal funding for any phase of the project nor does the Project include the implementation of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
• Legal descriptions, plat maps and preliminary title reports will be provided by Mark Thomas. Mark Thomas will update the preliminary title reports if older than one year. • Any modification to the legal descriptions and property requirements after the appraisal process has been initiated will result in a change to the above scope of work and fee.
• Monument will attempt to obtain Permits to Enter and Construct on a voluntary basis, otherwise, the CITY will discontinue efforts if the owner objects to the providing access or requires compensation.
• Assumes 60 days of good faith negotiations following the presentation of the City’s purchase offer to the property owner.
• The CITY will initiate condemnation action after 60 days of negotiations for any parcel where a settlement has not been reached.
PAGE 17 OF 20
• It is assumed no partial acquisition will result in the displacement of any occupant or personal property.
DELIVERABLE(S): Plat and Legal Descriptions for fee take acquisitions (2 hard copies and PDF format), Twenty-eight (28) Fee Appraisal, Twenty-eight (28) Partial Acquisitions, Nine (9) Permits to Enter & Construct
10. Bid Support
When requested by the CITY, Mark Thomas will respond to bidder inquiries for the updated Final PS&E bid package. Mark Thomas will respond to bidder inquires up to the maximum of ten (10) responses. Should CITY request that the Mark Thomas prepare the bid addendum documents and plans, we will prepare and provide bid addendum documents and plans up to 2 bid addendums.
DELIVERABLE(S): Ten (10) bidder inquires and Bid Addendum Documents and Plans (2)
Optional Items:
A. Contingency – 10%
The 10% design contingency is developed to resolve unforeseen issues during the design phase and when the original budget does not address other specific project requirements and goals.
B. Street Light Design
ADVANTEC, our subconsultant, will prepare street lighting plans along Locust Avenue between Riverside Avenue and Casmalia Street. The street lighting will include base mapping files. The plans will include as-built information, utilities, existing/proposed base mapping, and all existing and proposed street lighting poles, luminaires, pull boxes, conduit, service cabinets, and service point locations. The plans will also include street lighting pole schedules, conductor schedules, wiring diagrams, construction notes, and any details necessary to facilitate the installation and construction of the street lighting improvements and as required by the C ITY and Southern California Edison (SCE).
The street lighting plans will include the specified border, title block, signature block and will be prepared in AutoCAD at 1” =40’ scale with blow-ups at 1” =20’ scale and in accordance with standards set forth by each CITY.
We will prepare the project Technical Specifications and Bid Documents for the proposed street lighting improvements based on the City of Rialto's and SCE requirements; Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications and/or the GREENBOOK. The technical specificat ions will include a project description, preparation of bid schedules, bid item descriptions, payment methods, technical specifications, and any specification detail sheets or standard plans.
PAGE 18 OF 20
We will prepare construction quantity take-offs and construction cost estimates for the proposed street lighting improvements. The unit costs will be based on current cost data and historical cost data associated with the identified bid items. Preliminary and final quantities and construction cost estimates will be provided.
We will coordinate with SCE for design and installation of new street lighting poles, luminaires, conduit, conductors, pull boxes, and service cabinets along Locust Avenue between Rivers ide Avenue and Casmalia Street. We will coordinate with SCE to determine the service point location and feed to new street lighting service cabinet/enclosure. This typically requires filling out a SCE costumer service request form and coordinating design requirements including potential design from SCE (conductors, conduit, pull boxes, etc.). Due to the length of the roadway segment, it is assumed that this project will require up to 3 different service points. To help expedite the process, this requires early coordination with SCE staff, and will be one of our first orders of work. Our coordination efforts under this task will minimize delays during construction.
We will coordinate with City staff, collect and review available data for use and reference associated with the street lighting improvements. We will conduct a thorough field along the roadway segment. Our field review will consist, but not limited to collecting the following:
✓ Street lighting, conduit, conductors, pull boxes, and service cabinets ✓ Traffic signals poles, conduit, pull boxes, and cabinets ✓ Roadway features including curb lines, property lines, edges of pavement, edges of paved sidewalks, curb returns, curb ramps, and driveways
✓ Nearby at-grade utilities, catch basins, manholes, cabinets, sub-structures, vaults; and nearby aboveground utilities, power poles/overhead lines, street lights, etc. ✓ Other field conditions that might affect a design decision
Upon completion of the above items, we will identify potential constraints that may be encountered in relation to the proposed improvements. This information will be used to prepare base mapping and proposed improvements.
It is assumed that street lighting analysis is not needed for this project because City’s standard plans has provided typical street light pole spacing and type of luminaire to be used.
35 potholing are anticipated for the new street light pole foundation locations.
DELIVERABLE(S): Street Light Plans six (6) sheets at 65%, 90% and Final Submittals (PDF), Technical Specifications submittal at 90% and Final in Word and PDF format, Engineering Estimate at 90% and Final submittal in Excel and PDF format, SCE coordination and Design, Data collection inventory matrix, project survey, field review notes and photos, potholing (35)
PAGE 19 OF 20
C. Landscaping and Irrigation Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare landscaping and irrigation plans (32 sheets), specifications, and cost estimates for the proposed 6’-wide parkway.
DELIVERABLE(S): Landscaping and irrigation Plans (32) sheets, Technical Specifications, and Cost Estimate at 65%, 90% and Final% Submittals (PDF)
Assumptions
Mark Thomas has supplemented the Scope and Fee with the following Assumptions for the City's consideration.
1. Mark Thomas will take the lead in meetings and will be responsible for the preparation of meeting agendas and minutes as well as coordination of meeting times and locations with City of Rialto
2. The project will not require revalidation of the CEQA. Preparation of the revalidation document is not included in this scope. The City is responsible for preparing a notice of exemption.
3. No significant modifications, including reprofiling and/or major superelevation corrections would be required to any local streets or facilities beyond the project boundaries/limits.
4. The project will not require installation of a new traffic signals and intersection control.
5. The project will require minor modification of an existing traffic signals (signal heads replacement) at the intersection of Locust Avenue and Casmalia Street. Existing traffic signal poles and foundations at this intersection will remain at the current locations.
6. Traffic Control plan preparation and implementation during design survey activities has been excluded.
7. The project will not require modification of existing bridge structures.
8. New walls are not anticipated and wall design will not be required.
9. Aesthetics and hardscaping are not included as part of the project.
10. Construction will be administered by City and will require final processing and will follow the City’s boilerplate contract language. Project plans will be prepared in AutoCAD, using City drafting standards.
11. Preparation of a cooperative agreements are not included.
12. Dry Utility (joint trench) design is excluded.
13. Construction Management/Administration is specifically excluded from this scope.
14. Preparation of SWPPP is excluded.
15. Preparation of Construction Phasing and Maintenance of Traffic Plans are excluded.
PAGE 20 OF 20
16. Record drawing plan preparation is excluded.
17. Final Records of Survey and Construction surveying/staking is excluded.
18. Caltrans Encroachment Permits are not anticipated.
19. Hazardous materials or buried structures are not anticipated to be found or conflict with the geotechnical field explorations.
20. Current Standard Plans will be used for the project design. The Standard Plans include 2015 City Standard Plans and addendum, 2022 Caltrans Standard Plans, 2021 Standard Plans for Public Works construction (SPPWC), 2014 CAMUTCD Rev.6, etc. Project redesign with the updated standard plans is excluded.
21. The following plans, study, and analysis are excluded:
• Traffic Management Plan (TMP)
• Traffic and Pedestrian Detour Plans
• Temporary Traffic Signal Plans
• Temporary or Permanent Traffic Signal Interconnect Plans • Traffic Study
• Structural Analysis and Calculations for New Street Light Pole Foundation • Photometric Analysis for Street Lighting Design (City has standard plan for street light pole’s spacing)
Schedule
Work will be completed within 24 to 26 months from Notice to Proceed and receipt of all the survey data, and as-builts, not including right of way acquisition and construction.
Budget
We have prepared a fee estimate for these services, as detailed on the attached form. The total estimated cost is $1,429,603.
Sr. Engineering Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Technical Lead
Sr. Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Intern
Sr. Survey Manager
Sr. Project Surveyor
Lead Survey Technician
Sr. Survey Technician
2 Person Field Crew
LAUD Division Manager
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Project Accountant
Project Coordinator
Geocon
Monument
GEI
Advantec
$394 $289 $259 $214 $185 $157 $129 $73 $278 $214 $177 $144 $318 $278 $173 $139 $141 $129
1.0 Project Management/Administration
1.1 Project Management 8 80 80 8 24 32 232 $55,984 - - - - $55,984
1.2 Meetings (5) 4 20 20 20 64 $16,236 - - - - $16,236
1.3 Coordination with Subconsultants and Agencies 6 60 62 30 158 $41,312 - - - - $41,312
1.4 CPM Schedule, Progress Reports and Budgets 32 32 64 $17,536 - - - - $17,536
1.5 Quality Control Plan 32 32 64 $17,536 - - - - $17,536 Subtotal Phase 1 18 224 226 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 32 582 $148,604 $0 $0 $0 $0 $148,604
2.0 Survey
2.1 Research/Mobilization 40 20 32 32 2 126 $20,218 - - - - $20,218
2.2 Control Survey 20 40 32 70 2 5 169 $41,915 - - - - $41,915
2.3 Design Topography 30 46 40 172 10 2 5 305 $54,139 - - - - $54,139 Subtotal Phase 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 70 118 40 236 80 0 0 0 6 10 600 $116,272 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,272
3.0 Utility Coordination and Potholing
3.1 Data Compilation/Site Visit 1 8 12 16 16 53 $10,838 - - - - $10,838
3.2 Utility Conflict Mapping/Utility Relocation
Coordination and Agreements 8 12 30 56 106 $18,194 - - - - $18,194
3.3 Utility Potholing (24) 6 12 24 40 3 2 10 97 $18,810 - - - - $18,810 Subtotal Phase 3 1 22 36 0 70 0 112 0 3 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 256 $47,842 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,842
4.0 Geotechnical Analysis
4.1 Geotechnical Analysis and Report and TI
Calculations 0 $0 21,480 - - 7,600 $29,080 Subtotal Phase 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $21,480 $0 $0 $7,600 $29,080
5.0 Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis and Water Quality Management Plan
5.1 Draft and Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Study 2 12 24 140 60 50 288 $42,192 - - - - $42,192
5.1.1 Site Visit and Meeting with City's Drainage
Maintenance personnel (2) 4 4 8 8 24 $5,160 - - - - $5,160
5.2 Draft and Final Water Quality Management Plan 2 12 18 60 25 30 147 $22,373 - - - - $22,373 Subtotal Phase 5 0 8 28 50 0 208 85 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 459 $69,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,725
6.0 Environmental Approval
6.1 Modified Phase I ESA 0 $0 - - 13,700 - $13,700
6.2 CEQA Compliance 0 $0 - - 20,900 - $20,900 Subtotal Phase 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $34,600 $0 $34,600
7.0 Preliminary Design Conceptual Plans
Preliminary Design Conceptual Plans (4) 1"=40' 1 6 12 60 72 151 $25,624 - - - - $25,624 Subtotal Phase 7 1 6 12 0 60 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 $25,624 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,624
8.0 Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
Title Sheet (1) 1 2 6 24 33 $5,013 - - - - $5,013 Sheet Index (1) 1 2 6 24 33 $5,013 - - - - $5,013 Construction Notes (1) 1 2 6 24 33 $5,013 - - - - $5,013 COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE: City of Rialto- On-Call Civil Engineering Services - Locust Avenue between Riverside Avenue and Casmalia Street
TOTAL COST
Subconsultants
Total
Hours
Total MT
Cost
Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only.
See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges. 3/8/2023
Sr. Engineering Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Technical Lead
Sr. Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Intern
Sr. Survey Manager
Sr. Project Surveyor
Lead Survey Technician
Sr. Survey Technician
2 Person Field Crew
LAUD Division Manager
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Project Accountant
Project Coordinator
Geocon
Monument
GEI
Advantec
$394 $289 $259 $214 $185 $157 $129 $73 $278 $214 $177 $144 $318 $278 $173 $139 $141 $129
TOTAL COST
Subconsultants
Total
Hours
Total MT
Cost
Typical Sections (1) 1 4 8 40 53 $7,965 - - - - $7,965 Utility Plan (8) 1"=40' 8 16 48 96 168 $27,720 - - - - $27,720 Demolition Plans (4) 1"=40' 4 8 24 48 84 $13,860 - - - - $13,860 Horizontal Control Plans (2) 1"=80' 2 6 12 30 50 $8,222 - - - - $8,222 Plan and Profile (8) 1"=40' 16 40 96 88 132 372 $63,588 - - - - $63,588 Drainage Sheets (9) 1"=20' 12 36 64 48 108 268 $47,956 - - - - $47,956 Construction Details (6) (22 curb ramps & 28
Driveways) 1"=10' 6 24 64 88 100 282 $46,506 - - - - $46,506 Signing and Striping Plans (4) 1"=40' 4 16 32 64 116 $19,476 - - - - $19,476 Traffic Signal Modification Plans (1) 1"=20' 2 24 8 32 66 $12,402 - - - - $12,402 Specifications 2 6 88 96 $20,964 - - - - $20,964 Cost Estimate 6 12 32 60 110 $18,502 - - - - $18,502 QA&QC 1 120 121 $26,074 - - - - $26,074 Response to City's 65% Comments 1 24 32 32 40 129 $26,698 - - - - $26,698 Response to City's 90% Comments 1 12 24 24 32 93 $18,646 - - - - $18,646 Response to City's Final Comments 1 12 16 16 24 69 $14,062 - - - - $14,062 Subtotal Phase 8 4 114 270 272 414 224 878 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2176 $387,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $387,680
9.0 Right of Way
9.1 Exsting Right of Way 44 72 132 50 2 5 305 $63,475 - 9,578 - - $73,053
9.2 Plats and Legal Descriptions (28) 80 120 200 2 402 $77,002 - 9,579 - - $86,581
9.3 Right of Way Engineering 8 8 16 24 56 $10,440 - 7,000 - - $17,440
9.3 Right of Way Project Coordination 1 8 8 8 25 $6,258 - 9,580 - - $15,838
9.4 Fee Appraisal 1 16 16 16 49 $12,122 - 122,740 - - $134,862
9.5 Partial Acquisitions (28) 1 16 16 16 49 $12,122 - 103,460 - - $115,582
9.6 Permits to Enter & construct (9) 1 16 16 16 49 $12,122 - 9,080 - - $21,202 Subtotal Phase 9 4 64 64 0 72 0 24 0 124 192 0 332 50 0 0 0 4 5 935 $193,541 $0$271,017 $0 $0 $464,558
10.0 Bid Support
10.1 Responses to Bidder Inquiries (10) 4 10 20 34 $7,446 - - - - $7,446
10.2 Bid Addendum Documents and Plans (2) 8 8 16 32 64 $11,472 - - - - $11,472 Subtotal Phase 10 0 12 18 0 36 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 $18,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,918 Subtotal Phase 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL HOURS 28 450 654 322 710 432 1203 120 197 310 42 568 140 0 0 0 34 47 5257 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $86,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,700
TOTAL COST $11,032$130,050$169,386$68,908$131,350$67,824$155,187$8,760$54,766$66,340$7,434$81,792$44,520 $0 $0 $0$4,794$6,063 $1,094,906 $21,480$271,017 $34,600 $7,600$1,429,603
OPTIONAL TASKS
A Contingency - 10% 0 $142,960 - - - - $142,960 B1 Street Lighting Plans (6) and SCE Coordination 2 4 4 10 $2,354 - - - 29,650 $32,004 B2 Potholing for New Street Light Pole Locations (35) 2 4 4 10 $2,354 - - - 70,000 $72,354 C Landscaping and Irrigation (32) 48 360 360 768 $125,664 - - - - $125,664 0 $0 - - - - $0 0 $0 - - - - $0 0 $0 - - - - $0 Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only.
See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges. 3/8/2023
Sr. Engineering Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Technical Lead
Sr. Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Intern
Sr. Survey Manager
Sr. Project Surveyor
Lead Survey Technician
Sr. Survey Technician
2 Person Field Crew
LAUD Division Manager
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Project Accountant
Project Coordinator
Geocon
Monument
GEI
Advantec
$394 $289 $259 $214 $185 $157 $129 $73 $278 $214 $177 $144 $318 $278 $173 $139 $141 $129
TOTAL COST
Subconsultants
Total
Hours
Total MT
Cost
0 $0 - - - - $0 0 $0 - - - - $0 0 $0 - - - - $0 0 $0 - - - - $0 Subtotal Optional Tasks 0 4 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 360 360 0 0 788 $273,332 $0 $0 $0 $99,650 $372,982 TOTAL HOURS - OPTIONAL 0 4 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 360 360 0 0 788 OTHER DIRECT COSTS - OPTIONAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COST - OPTIONAL $0 $1,156 $2,072 $0 $1,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,344 $62,280 $50,040 $0 $0 $273,332 $0 $0 $0 $99,650 $372,982 Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only.
See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges. 3/8/2023
Attachment A
Lead Agency: City of Rialto
Project Name: Locust Avenue Widening
Proeprty Acquisition Parcel List
Date: March 3, 2023
No. APN Property Owner Property Address Present Use
Proposed
Acquisition
1 239-301-47 Green Tree Investment Partners No Situs Address Vacant Lot PT - Fee 2 239-301-46 Green Tree Investment Partners5143 N Locust Ave Vacant CommercialPT - Fee 3 239-301-42 NORIEGA, JOSEPH A
3335 N Locust Ave Commercial PT - Fee
4 239-301-57 2 Units
Gloria Pound
PTI US Towers II LLC
3344 N Locust Ave Light Industrial
Communications
Permit to Enter
& Construct
5 239-301-58 Multiple Owners
AAA Paving Co
SBA 2012 TC Assets LLC
3330 N Locust Ave Light Industrial
Communications
PT - Fee
6 239-301-04 AAA Paving Co 3330 N Locust AveMisc/CommunicationsPT - Fee 7 239-301-05 Sammie L Vick 5248 N Locust AveSingle Fam ResidentialPT - Fee 8 239-301-06 Delores Reggio 5250 N Locust AveSingle Fam ResidentialPT - Fee 9 239-301-52 Batfish Holdings LLC No Situs Address Vacant PT - Fee 10 239-301-23Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California
2130 N Locust Ave Vacant PT - Fee
11 239-301-44 Esteban Agredano 3197 N Locust Ave Commercial PT - Fee 12 239-192-16 Locust Casa Grande LLC Casa Grande Dr Light Industrial Communications
PT - Fee
13 239-192-15 Locust Casa Grande LLC No Situs Address Vacant industrialPT - Fee 14 239-301-51 Rialto Springs LLC 18145 W Coast Blvd Vacant industrialPT - Fee 15 239-301-56 Rialto Locus Land Co No Situs Address Vacant industrialPT - Fee 16 239-301-55 Rialto Locus Land Co 5361 N Locust Ave Misc/School PT - Fee 17 239-192-14 Locust Casa Grande LLC No Situs Address Industrial/Public Storage/Mini Warehouse
PT - Fee
18 239-193-07 Blackburg Inc No Situs Address "Vacant" PT - Fee 19 239-491-40 Real Property Acq and Dev Co 3047 N Locust Ave Industrial/Public Storage/Mini Warehouse
Permit to Enter
& Construct
20 239-491-41 Trex Property Investments LLC3047 N Locust Ave #B Industrial/Public Storage/Mini Warehouse
Permit to Enter
& Construct
21 239-193-10 Ramesh Dolwani 2941 N Locust Ave Light Industrial PT - Fee 22 239-193-11 Locust XC LLC No Situs Address Vacant PT - Fee 23 239-192-23 BT Property LLC No Situs Address Vacant PT - Fee 24 239-193-16 Spartan Industries 2823 N Locust Ave Industrial/Public Storage/Mini Warehouse
Permit to Enter
& Construct
25 1133-091-19 Reina Holding Company LLC 2775 N Locust Ave Light IndustrialPermit to Enter & Construct
26 1133-091-20 Reina Holding Company LLC 2775 N Locust Ave Light IndustrialPermit to Enter & Construct
Attachment A
27 1133-031-01 Tubular Steel Inc 2750 N Locust Ave Light IndustrialPermit to Enter & Construct
28 1133-091-22 MBAR Properties LLC 2745 N Locust Ave Light Industrial PT - Fee 29 1133-091-23 MBAR Properties LLC No Situs Address Light Industrial PT - Fee 30 1133-091-24 MBAR Properties LLC No Situs Address Light Industrial PT - Fee 31 1133-091-06 Luis Cordero No Situs Address Vacant/ResidentialPT - Fee 32 1133-041-02 Robert Frank Zadina No Situs Address Misc Permit to Enter & Construct
33 1133-061-02 Ken & Tel Properties LLC 1910 Stonehurst Dr Light IndustrialPermit to Enter & Construct
34 1133-081-01 Golden Land Real Estate LLC No Situs Address Vacant PT - Fee 35 1133-081-02 Golden Land Real Estate LLC No Situs Address Vacant PT - Fee 36 1133-081-04 John Benhart
SBA 2012 TC Assets LLC
2438 N Locust Ave Light Industrial
Communications
PT - Fee
37 1133-201-20 Josephine Marie Gonzales No Situs Address Vacant PT - Fee