Wednesday, June 28, 2023
City of Rialto
Council Chambers
150 S. Palm Ave.
Rialto, CA 92376
Rialto City Hall, Council Chambers, 150 S. Palm Ave. Rialto CA 92376 Water Subcommittee
Regular Meeting - Final
1 June 28, 2023Water Subcommittee Regular Meeting - Final
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS
REVIEW/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
WS-23-606 Minutes from the March 8, 2023 Meeting
Meeting Minutes 3-8-23.pdfAttachments:
REPORTS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
WS-23-631 Update on Lake Rialto Design
WS-23-623 Amendment to San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement
2 - Attachment 1 - GC First Amendment 2023 20230501 w Exhibit.pdf 2 - Attachment 2 - Executed SBB GC Framework Agreement.pdf 2 - Attachment 3 - SWP Water Supplies.pdf
Attachments:
WS-23-630 Amendment Number No. 1 to the Marketing License Agreement with Service Line Warranty of America, Inc.
3 - Attachment 1 - Original Signed Agreement.pdf
3 - Attachment 2 - City of Rialto_Rialto Utility Authority Amendment 1.docx 3 - Attachment 3 - City of Rialto Fact Sheet.pdf
Attachments:
WS-23-624 Request for the Water Subcommittee to approve of the 2022 Consumer Confidence Drinking Water Report and Recommend the Rialto City Council Receive and File the Report.
(ACTION)
Attachment 1 - Rialto Consumer Confidence Report 2022.pdfAttachments:
WS-23-607 Present Findings of Phase 1: Water/Wastewater Revenue Analysis of the Water and Wastewater Rate Study and provide staff direction. (ACTION)
Attachment 1 - Rialto Presentation 06132023.pdfAttachments:
UPDATES
WS-23-625 Utilities Manager Update
UPCOMING MEETINGS
2 June 28, 2023Water Subcommittee Regular Meeting - Final
ADJOURNMENT
3 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-606, Version: 1, Agenda #:
For Water Subcommittee Meeting [ June 28, 2023]
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
FROM: Thomas J. Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
Minutes from the March 8, 2023 Meeting
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
4 1
CITY OF RIALTO
REGULAR MEETING OF THE WATER SUBCOMMITTEE
March 08, 2023 - 10:00 A.M.
MINUTES
The Regular meeting of the Water Subcommittee of the City of Rialto was held in the Civic Center Council Chambers located at 150 S. Palm Avenue, Rialto, California 92376, on Wednesday, March 8, 2023.
o0o
CALL TO ORDER Call to order at 6:00 P.M.
o0o
ROLL CALL The roll call was taken by Executive Assistant, Angela Perry.
Subcommittee Members / City Staff:
Mayor Deborah Robertson
Council Member Ed Scott
Arron Brown, Acting City Manager
Robert Messinger, Assistant City Attorney
Tom Crowley, Utility Manager
Toyasha Sebbag, Assistant to the CM
Tanya Williams, Assistant to the CM
Nicole Hemmans, Senior Administration Analyst
Angela Perry, Mayor & City Manager’s Executive Assistant Patricia Lozano, Council & City Manager’s Executive Assistant
Other Attendees
Steve Dopudja, Consultant
Peter Lucetti, Table Rock
Rolf Ohlemutz, Rialto Water Services
o0o
PUBLIC COMMENTS None.
o0o
APPROVAL OF MINUTES-
Regular Meeting of January 25, 2023
January 25, 2023, Minutes Approved.
5 2
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
o0o
WS-23-249 - Update and presentation
on Lake Rialto Habitat Management
Community Open Space Project (Lake
Rialto)
PowerPoint presentation provided by Steve Dopudja and Tom Crowley.
Questions & Comments
The Subcommittee had concerns about the feedback from departments and would like to see the list of those that attended the staff meeting.
Mayor asked about the stormwater.
o Steve provided an explanation about the water that falls on the treatment plant.
CM Scott asked where are the pumps pumping to?
o Per Steve, onsite.
Major asked about it going over the channel.
o Steve provided an explanation on how it will flow.
CM Scott asked why is this a classroom versus a visitors center? o Staff will update the name going forward.
It was mentioned that IEUA would pay for the repaving /widening of Santa Ana.
o Mayor asked for it to be added to the review.
Peter mentioned that he is in discussion with IEUA and West Valley Water District on another project that passes through Rialto. o Mayor requested a separate meeting to discuss full
disclosure on this matter.
Mayor requ est for Kinder Morgan document be included on the agenda.
Mayor inquired if grant inf ormation was received from Bureau of Reclamation, as there are other grants that she is looking at.
CM Scott asked if there were any environmental cleanup needed at the site.
o Per Tom, there was concern mentioned about the flies.
Mayor requested a future agenda item on the arrangement with Edison disclosing what Edison gets based on what the City gets.
6 3
o0o
WS-23-256 - Capital Program
Financing
PowerPoint presentation provided by Peter Lucetti, Table Rock.
Questions & Comments
Mayor inquired about the project list from Soto Resources and asked for an update on the AMI meters. Mayor asked about moving it.
CM Scott expressed his concern that all of the other projects that need to be done were missed when they went through the concession.
CM Scott asked the following questions:
o How much was the cost of the list of projects in 2012? o How many projects on the list were in the original
concession agreement?
o Why isn’t Ste ve Dopudja involved in the concession
agreement?
Mayor said that the projects identified in the concession agreeme nt should be noted on the Projects List.
Mayor asked what Legacy projects do we have?
o Peter advised that he has a detailed projects list.
o Mayor asked that it be updated to include the legacy projects.
Mayor is asking about the old items that would be of concern to the residents, particularly, the Advanced Metering Infrastruct ure (AMI)project.
o Peter said that it was decided not to do the automated meters, then it came back that they should do automated meters.
o Mayor wants to know what the residents get from the AMI project. Per Peter, they get more accurate meter reading.
Mayor said we haven’t given back to the residents.
CM Scott said , “we can’t meet coverage in water , but they want a bridge loan”.
What is the cost of the lease payment?
o Peter provided an explanation.
o CM Scott thought we were only taking 2 million out.
7 4
o Tom advised that it goes into the General Fund and the RUA Reserve.
CM Scott asked is there an interest or annual payment on the money? What if you can’t get permanent financing?
o Peter said financing is different than a grant.
CM Scott asked what happens if you can’t make the payment?
Mayor asked when do we see a rate increases?
o Per Peter, a rate strategy should be during this calendar year.
CM Scott asked staff if they know what those increases are?
Tom advised that at the next Council meeting they want to put a Bridge loan on the agenda.
o CM Scott said we went through and evaluated our assets – it should have come up then. Well 3A is new since 2010 – grant is 10 mil.
Mayor wanted to know who vetted for a DTSC grant and why do we need the project?
o Tom said mor e supply. AMI – we replaced 4,000 –
retrofittable and are now looking for funding of 6 mil for that project.
CM Scott asked why would we go after a 2M project when we need 8M?
Mayor asked if the AMI project w as in the state system and if it went through the SAWPA project?
o Tom stated no because of other project s that were
submitted.
Mayor asked if it was a requirement of SAWPA?
o Tom stated no.
CM Scott asked why go only after high priori ty projects and not all projects?
Toyasha advised that RUA staff meet with Soto Group bi-weekly, and they maintain a project list.
Mayor asked how we get more aggressive in going out for these grants and advised to go for the maximum amount when going for a grant. 8 5
Mayor asking about the Microgrid Project – have we applied under of Department of Energy as a research project? She wants a briefing regarding the battery use.
Arron mentioned that when the Microgrid went to Council the bridge loan was not discussed.
CM Scott said that a proposed rate structure should have come with this proposal. He cannot vote without that structure.
Peter said that they don’t have to put the bridge financing out, it can get pushed to 2024, but things will have to be put off. He said that they are trying to solve a big problem.
CM Scott asked if we knew that we needed temporary financing when the microgrid was brought to them
o Staff responded no.
Mayor would like to see another alternative. She said they n eed to look at the list to see if we need them.
Tom commented:
o Well3A is the lowest priority.
o Plant 1 and 2 and electrical – to make r oom for the solar panel
o Solid’s handling
o Digester #1 for lift station
o If we don’t do microgrid we would need to have backup on site.
- Mayor said this is not ready.
Peter will put a hold on al l projects for now and await further instructions.
Mayor said that everyone needs to work on this.
Peter said that the offsite meeting needs to be done.
CM Scott said you can’t do one discussion without the rate increase discussion.
CM Scott instructed staff to move forward with what was approved on at the last council meeting and that staff should have included Arron on these discussions.
9 6
WS-23-240 – Proposed Water Rate
Analysis
Presentation provided by Toya sha Sebbag pertaining to the Cit y o f Rialto’s proposed water rate analysis to be completed by June 2023.
Questions & Comments
CM Scott said that staff was asked to get comps from surrounding cities as it relates to the rates for water and sewer compared . He commented that he will not discuss at this time.
Mayor would like to know what the surrounding cities are paying for rates from all.
Mayor asked Angie to go back and listen to the previous meeting regarding this topic.
Mayor asked Arron to get a workshop date set to discuss this topic in more detail.
Arron advised the total package needs to be brought back.
o0o
WS-23-235 – Utility Manager
Updates
Updates provided by Tom Crowley, Utility manager.
Questions & Comments
CM Scott requested for Utility Manager updates to be listed on the agenda so that they can be read prior to the meeting.
o0o
ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 12:17 p.m.
10 7
11 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-631, Version: 1, Agenda #:
For Water Subcommittee Meeting [June 28, 2023]
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Thomas J. Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
Stephen Dopudja, Dopudja Wells Consulting
Update on Lake Rialto Design
BACKGROUND
Status of Civil/Site Plans:
· Review the revised grading concepts including the soil retention wall. · Initial parking / ADA assessment on Agua Mansa Road. Parking Alternatives. · RFP for plant growing of landscape material.
· Community facilities, restrooms, and picnic tables, etc.
Additionally, discuss effluent pipeline update within the City’s boundary to accommodate paving projects on Santa Ana Ave.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Operating Budget Impact
Unknown at this time.
Capital Improvement Budget Impact
Pursuing grant funding opportunities. Current status:
· SWRCB Earmark Funds (Levey) $1.05 M
· SAWPA Prop 1 Round 2 - $2.14 M
· Federal Earmark (Aguilar) $2.0 M
· Total Project Cost is $8 M
· Remaining funds needed $3 M
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Water Subcommittee to receive update on Lake Rialto Design.
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
12 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-623, Version: 1, Agenda #:
For Water Subcommittee Meeting [June 28, 2023]
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Thomas J. Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
Amendment to San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement BACKGROUND:
As a result of years of severe drought across the state, the California Legislature enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 (SGMA). This act established a statewide framework for the sustainable management of groundwater resources, which focuses on granting new authorities and responsibilities to local agencies. Ensuring water supply reliability and long-term groundwater sustainability has become even more important as a result of the long-term drought and the reduced availability of State Water Project water from Northern California. While adjudicated basins such as the San Bernardino Basin Area (SBBA), which includes the Bunker Hill and Lytle Creek Groundwater Basins, are not subject to most provisions of the act, water managers are expected to manage the SBBA in accordance with the sustainability principals to avoid deleterious impacts on the basin.
In February 2018, the City of Rialto (City) and several local water agencies developed a Groundwater Sustainability Council for the SBBA, now known as the San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council (GC). The goals of the GC were to identify and maximize water resources that support a sustainable water supply into the future, and to equitably share the cost of those resources amongst the SBBA producers. Two primary products were developed: 1) a method to equitably allocate the costs of sustainable basin management, and 2) a five-year agreement that lays out an organizational structure to administer the process. The equitably allocated costs include a San Bernardino Valley administered sustainability component which involves State Water Project (SWP) water purchases and an operation and maintenance (O&M) component provided by the San Bernardino Valley Conservation District (Conservation District). In February 2018, the City approved the San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement (GC Agreement).
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:
The GC Agreement was a five-year agreement that expired in February 2023. Before expiration of the agreement, an agreement renewal subcommittee (Subcommittee) was formed by the GC to discuss potential renewal. Unfortunately, a renewal agreement could not be reached due to concerns by members regarding long-term obligations from a new agreement and with ongoing commitments/partnerships by some of the agencies in other related efforts. In order to continue discussions and allow the Conservation District sufficient time to adjust should the GC no longer continue, the Subcommittee recommended an amendment that extends the GC agreement to June 30, 2024. The amendment also includes an updated equitable cost allocation model, and it provides City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
13 File #: WS-23-623, Version: 1, Agenda #:
30, 2024. The amendment also includes an updated equitable cost allocation model, and it provides additional funds from the GC for water purchases in a year where there is 100% allocation from the SWP. The Amendment to the San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement (Amendment) is attached along with the original approved agreement, Attachment 1 and 2, respectively.
Since its establishment through March 2023, the GC has deposited approximately $12.2 million for wet year imported water purchase to San Bernardino Valley for 103,166 acre-feet; almost 60% of that water purchase has been recharged and the balance is scheduled for delivery this year and early 2024. The GC is confident that the extension of the Agreement through June 30, 2024, provides sufficient time to conclude the productive discussions on additional refinements for this successful cooperative groundwater recharge program. Attachment 3 is the status of the available State Water Project water for recharge and direct delivery to the SBBA.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact resulting from this amendment is $203,012 as calculated in the updated Equitable Allocation Method (Amendment Exhibit B). This is budgeted in Rialto Utility Authority’sFiscal Year 2023/2024 Budget.
Operating Budget Impact
No impact to the operating budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the Water Subcommittee recommend the City Council and Rialto Utility Authority approve the Amendment to San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement.
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
14 159/015042-0001
10094328.32 a06/14/23 -1-
AMENDMENT TO SAN BERNARDINO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL
FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT TO SAN BERNARDINO BASIN GROUNDWATER COUNCIL FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into and effective this ___ day of ____________, 2023 by and among the City of Colton (“ Colton”), the City of Redlands (“Redlands”), the City of Rialto (“ Rialto”), the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (“SBMWD ”), City of Loma Linda (“ Loma Linda”), East Valley Water District (“East Valley”), S an Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (“ Valley District ”), San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (“ Conservation District ”), Fontana Water Company (“ FWC”), West Valley Water District (“ WVWD”), Yucaipa Valley Water District (“Yucaipa”), Bear Valley Mutual Water Company (“BVMWC”), and Loma” Linda University (“LLU”) each of which is referred to as a “Party ,” for the purpose of extending the original San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement until June 30, 2024, while participants continue their analysis and deliberations regarding its potential longer term renewal.
This Amendment is entered into in consideration of all of the following:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on or about February 27, 2018, the Parties to this A mendment entered into that certain “San Bernardino Basin Groundwater Council Framework Agreement ” (“Original Agreement”) for the purpose of coordinating basin management and cooperatively funding basin maintenance and groundwater recharge activities within the San Bernardino Basin Area; and WHEREAS, the Original Agreement had a term of five (5) years; WHEREAS, the Groundwater Council formed under the Original Agreement has been functioning successfully since then, allowing a forum for cooperative management and input of basin maintenance, operation, and recharge activity, including cooperative funding for imported or other supplemental water supplies when available for replenishing local groundwater supplies; and
WHEREAS, in light of the coming expiration of the five -year term of the Original Agreement, the Parties have undertaken deliberation and debate on modifications that might be made to the Groundwater Council’s structure and procedures, including refinements to its Equitable Allocation Model; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached agreement on modifications to the Equitable Allocation Model, but have not finalized consensus on other contemplated changes to the Groundwater Council processes, structures, and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to implement the Equitable Allocation Model revisions on which they have reached agreement, but continue the Original Agreement in all other respects as originally adopted to allow for further investigations and potential improvements to the original Groundwater Council, its purposes, processes, and procedures. 15 159/015042-0001
10094328.32 a06/14/23 -2-
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the matters recited and the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. EQUITABLE ALLOCATION MODEL
The Equitable Allocation Model , attached to the Original Agreement as Exhibit B, is hereby replaced, and superseded in its entirety by the Equitable Allocation Model attached to this Amendment as Amended Exhibit B.
2. TERM
Paragraph 2.2 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
This Agreement shall remain in effect until June 30, 2024, unless earli er terminated by the unanimous written consent of all then- active Parties, provided, however, that this Agreement shall remain in effect during the term of any contractual obligation or indebtedness of the GC that was previously approved by the GC.
3. REMAINDER OF ORIGINAL AGREEMENT UNAFFECTED.
Except as specifically amended herein, the remainder of the Original Agreement is and shall be unaffected by this Amendment, with the intent that only the Term and the Equitable Allocation Model shall vary from the Original Agreement, and except as specifically so amended, the Original Agreement in all of its particulars shall remain in full force and effect throughout the extended term.
4. COUNTERPARTS.
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
[Signatures continued on next page]
16 159/015042-0001
10094328.32 a06/14/23 -5-
DATED: ____________________, 2023
CITY OF RIALTO
a California general law city and
municipal corporation
By:__________________________________
Arron Brown, Acting City Manager
[Signatures continued on next page]
17 159/015042-0001
10094328.32 a06/14/23
Exhibit B
EQUITABLE ALLOCATION METHOD
The Parties to this agreement are currently sharing costs and establishing the voting weight for each Party using the following method, which is performed annually after the annual submittal of the Western-San Bernardino Watermaster Report to the Court. The details for this method are included in a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet titled REVISED_EAM_Budget_FY23- 24_V3.xlsx, as amended by the GC from time to time, which is incorporated here by reference.
Copies of that file have been made available to all parties.
I. Calculation of the Equitable Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost.
The equitable distribution of the O&M Costs amongst the Parties shall be calculated from the approved budget, as follows:
Equitable O&M Cost Plaintiffs = 0.2795 x O&M Costs
Equitable O&M Cost Non Plaintiffs = Proportion of Total Pumping x 0.7205 x O&M Costs where,
O&M Costs = annual budgeted or actual costs to operate and maintain the facilities needed to recharge supplemental water into the SBBA that have been reviewed and approved by the Council
Proportion of Total Pumping (%) = Party’s total SBBA pumping Non-Plaintiff Total SBBA Pumping
where,
Party’s total SBBA pumping (acre-feet) = the Party’s total amount pumped from the SBBA for the previous complete calendar year, as published by the Western-San Bernardino Watermaster, and adjusted for any water pumped by one Party and received by another Party, to coordinate with non-parties still paying the groundwater charge, Parties may be requested to report production to the SBVWCD, as needed.
Non-P laintiff Total SBBA Pumping (acre -feet) = total Non-Plaintiff pumping of the parties for the previous complete calendar year, as recorded by the Western-San Bernardino Watermaster.
II. Calculation of the Equitable Supplemental Water Cost.
The equitable distribution of the supplemental water cost will only be paid by the Non-Plaintiff parties and shall be calculated, as follows:
Equitable Water Cost = Party Gap + Sustainability
18 159/015042-0001
10094328.32 a06/14/23
where,
Party Gap ($) = 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐿𝐿𝐺𝐺 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 5 𝑌𝑌𝑌𝑌𝐺𝐺 𝑌𝑌𝐿𝐿 ∗ 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐺𝐺 𝐺𝐺 𝑆𝑆𝑌𝑌𝑆𝑆𝑌𝑌𝑆𝑆𝐿𝐿 𝐺𝐺 𝑆𝑆 𝑊𝑊𝐺𝐺𝐿𝐿 𝑌𝑌𝑌𝑌 𝐶𝐶 𝐶𝐶𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 where,
𝐺𝐺
𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐿𝐿𝐺𝐺𝐿𝐿 𝐿𝐿 5 𝑌𝑌 𝑌𝑌 𝐺𝐺 𝑌𝑌𝐿𝐿 < 0, else Party Gap ($) = $0 Gap Last 5 Years (acre-feet) = Safe Yield Last 5 Years - Demand Previous Year + Net New Recycled Previous Year
where,
Demand Previous Year = total water demand calculated for the Party for the previous year using published data, as approved by the Council.
The safe yield of the last 5 years for the SBBA will be proportioned amongst the Parties as described below.
where,
Net New Recycled Previous Year = The amount of recycled water from the previous year minus Recycled 1959-63
where,
Recycled1959-63 is the amount of recycled water used in the base period 50% Local SW Recharged = 50% of the 5-year average local surface water available to an agency that is controlled by that agency and intentionally delivered for groundwater recharge into the Basin
Sustainability ($) = Water Use x (Total Equitable Water Cost – Total Gap ($)) where,
Sustainability Water Use (%) =
Party Water Use (acre−feet)−50% Local SW Recharged
Total Water Use (acre−feet)−50% Total Local SW Recharged where,
Party Water Use (acre-feet) = the Party’s total average water use over the past, complete, 5 year period (surface water, groundwater, recycled water, imported water, 50% Local SW Recharged, etc.)
Total Water Use (acre-feet) = Summation of each individual Party Water Use 50% Total Local SW Recharged = 50% of the sum of all Local SW Recharged Total Equitable Water Cost = Sustainable Amount x Supplemental Water Cost where,
19 159/015042-0001
10094328.32 a06/14/23
Sustainable Amount (acre-feet) = The amount of supplemental water, in acre-feet, needed to achieve long-term sustainability which shall be determined by the GC Supplemental Water cost ($/acre-f oot) = The cost for recharged Supplemental Water.
The cost for SWP water will be as published in the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Resolution 888, as amended
Total Gap ($) = Summation of each individual Party Gap ($) for all Parties Proportioning Safe Yield.
The Western-San Bernardino Judgment does not apportion the safe yield by water agency. The Parties agree that, for purposes of this agreement, the Safe Yield will be apportioned, as follows:
Safe Yield Last 5 years: The safe yield for the previous 5, complete, calendar years shall be proportioned based upon the total water use for each Party, as follows:
Safe Yield Last 5 Years = Party Water Use x Safe Yield Non Plaintiffs Where,
Water Use is a percentage (%) and is defined above
Safe Yield Non Plaintiffs = defined by the Western-San Bernardino Watermaster from time to time, currently 172,745 acre-feet
Credit for Water. A party can provide Net New Recycled Previous Year and 50% Local SW Recharged and receive monetary credit towards their Equitable water cost.
Credit for Water ($) = (Net New Recycled Previous Year + 50% Local SW Recharged) x Supplemental Cost where,
Net New Recycled Previous Year = defined above
50% Local SW Recharged = defined above
Supplemental Water Cost = defined above
III. Formula for Voting Weight. The voting weight for each Party will be calculated, as follows:
Voting Weight = Total Party Cost
Total Costs
Where,
Total Party Cost = Equitable O&M Cost Non Plaintiffs + Equitable Water Cost Total Costs = 0.7205 x O&M Costs + Total Sustainable Water Cost The total sum of all of the individual Voting Weight values shall be equal to 1.0. 20 REVISED GC EAM FY23-24
Agency Party Gap
FY23-24 (AF)
Sustainability
FY23-24 (AF)
Credit for
Water brought
to the Basin
(AF)
Total
Equitable
Water Cost
FY23-24 ($)
Water
Corrections
for Previous
Years ($)
Total Water
Cost with
Corrections
($)
Total Water
with
Corrections
(AF)
Equitable O&M
Costs FY23-24
($)
O&M
Corrections for
Previous Years
($)
Total O&M
Cost with
Corrections
($)
Total Party
Costs FY23-24
($)
Voting
Weight
2023-24
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company - 15 (1,290) -$ -$ -$ 0 594$ -$ 594$ 594$ 0.02% City of Colton - 656 - 77,683$ -$ 77,683$ 656 15,462$ -$ 15,462$ 93,145$ 2.8% City of Loma Linda - 1,120 - 132,569$ -$ 132,569$ 1120 46,146$ -$ 46,146$ 178,715$ 5.4% City of Redlands - 6,647 (6,158) 57,899$ -$ 57,899$ 489 225,832$ -$ 225,832$ 283,731$ 8.6% City of Rialto - 1,319 (5) 155,589$ -$ 155,589$ 1314 47,423$ -$ 47,423$ 203,012$ 6.1% City of San Bernardino - 8,927 (3) 1,056,556$ -$ 1,056,556$ 8924 368,652$ -$ 368,652$ 1,425,208$ 43.1% East Valley Water District - 4,561 (1,227) 394,790$ -$ 394,790$ 3334 110,211$ -$ 110,211$ 505,001$ 15.3% Fontana Union Water Company - 1,229 - 145,571$ -$ 145,571$ 1229 30,586$ -$ 30,586$ 176,157$ 5.3% Loma Linda University - 222 - 26,308$ -$ 26,308$ 222 9,412$ -$ 9,412$ 35,720$ 1.1% San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. - 20 - 2,367$ -$ 2,367$ 20 9$ -$ 9$
2,376$ 0.1%
West Valley Water District - 2,730 ( 8) 322,265$ -$ 322,265$ 2722 76,680$ -$ 76,680$ 398,945$ 12.1% Yucaipa Valley Water District - 27 - 3,186$ -$ 3,186$ 27 852$ -$ 852$ 4,038$ 0.1% Total GC Parties: - 27,473 (8,691) 2,374,783$ -$ 2,374,783$ 20057 931,858$ -$ 931,858$ 3,306,641$ 100% Mountain View Power Co. - 296 - 35,040$ -$ 35,040$ 296 #N/A -$ #N/A 35,040$ #N/A Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 - 373 - 44,129$ -$ 44,129$ 373 #N/A -$ #N/A 44,129$ #N/A San Bernardino County - Facility Management 29.28 205 - 27,775$ -$ 27,775$ 235 #N/A -$ #N/A 27,775$ #N/A Terrace Water Company - 51 - 6,038$ -$ 6,038$ 51 #N/A -$ #N/A 6,038$ #N/A Other Inside SBVWCD - 1,353 - 160,253$ -$ 160,253$ 1353 #N/A -$ #N/A 160,253$ #N/A Other Outside SBVWCD - 219 - 25,931$ -$ 25,931$ 219 #N/A -$ #N/A 25,931$ #N/A San Bernardino Non-Parties Total: 29.28 2,497 - 299,166$ -$ 299,166$ 2527 -$ -$ -$ 299,166$ 0% Western Entities Total: - - - - - - 0 -$ - - -$ 0% Total: 29 29,971 (8,691) 2,673,949$ -$ 2,673,949$ 22584 931,858$ -$ 931,858$ 3,605,808$ 100% REVISED Groundwater Council Equitable Allocation Budget for FY 2023-24 4/25/2023
21 REVISED EAM FY 2023-24
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
2930
3132
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 5859
6061
62 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S
REVISED EAM - FY 2023-24 Calculation
Precipitation Adjustment 0% Sustainable Amount (AF) 30,000 New Conservation Present Safe Yield Recharge 95% Budgeted Water Cost 3,552,000$ Non-Plaintiff 72.05% 167,238 5,507 172,745 Direct Use 100% Budgeted O&M Cost SBVWCD 731,858$ Plaintiff 27.95% 64,862 2,136 66,998 SWP Cost Recharge ($/AF) 118$ Budgeted O&M SBCFCD Facility 200,000$ Budgeted Admin Costs -$
Current (last 5 years)
2017-21
(5 years)
Total SBBA
Demand
Agency Abbreviation 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Average SBBA
Use 2017-21
(AF)
SWP (AF)
Recycled
WaterPrevious Year
(AF)
50% of Local
Supplies for
Recharge Average
2017-21 (AF)
Party Water Use
(AF) % of Total Safe Yield Last 5 Years
(AF)
Safe Yield % of
Total
Demand Previous Year
(2021)
New Direct
Recycled
(AF)
Recycled
Water1959-63
(AF)
New Recharge
Recycled
(AF)
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company BVMWC 10,332 10,220 6,940 12,383 13,515 10,678 262 - 1,290 12,231 8.1% 14,041 5.86% (13,515) - - - City of Colton Colton 3,842 3,695 2,943 2,624 1,743 2,969 - - - 2,969 2.0% 3,409 1.42% (1,743) - - - City of Loma Linda Loma Linda 5,070 5,158 4,725 5,182 5,202 5,067 - - - 5,067 3.4% 5,817 2.43% (5,202) - 235 - City of Redlands Redlands 25,528 25,675 23,597 25,573 25,968 25,268 84 4,731 1,427 31,510 20.9% 36,173 15.09% (25,968) 6,799 2,068 - City of Rialto Rialto 3,149 6,411 5,406 5,091 6,313 5,274 696 - 5 5,975 4.0% 6,859 2.86% (6,313) - - - City of San Bernardino SBMWD 29,154 39,523 37,144 39,618 41,558 37,399 3,000 - 3 40,403 26.9% 46,382 19.35% (41,558) - - - East Valley Water District EVWD 20,103 19,989 17,143 20,828 17,715 19,156 1,489 - 1,227 21,871 14.5% 25,108 10.47% (17,715) - - - Fontana Union Water Company FWC 4,112 5,147 6,045 6,424 6,094 5,564 - - - 5,564 3.7% 6,388 2.66% (6,094) - - - Loma Linda University LLU 990 986 961 1,030 1,061 1,006 - - - 1,006 0.7% 1,154 0.48% (1,061) - - - Mountain View Power Co. SCE 1,889 863 1,251 1,674 1,020 1,339 - - - 1,339 0.9% 1,538 0.64% (1,020) - - - Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 MMWC 1,652 1,649 1,571 1,739 1,823 1,687 - - - 1,687 1.1% 1,936 0.81% (1,823) - - - San Bernardino County - Facility Management SBC 841 846 770 1,093 1,096 929 - - - 929 0.6% 1,067 0.44% (1,096) - - - San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. SBVMWD - 449 1 1 1 90 - - - 90 0.1% 104 0.04% (1) - - - Terrace Water Company Terrace 464 343 205 141 1 231 - - - 231 0.2% 265 0.11% (1) - - - West Valley Water District WVWD 9,226 11,006 12,216 13,875 12,086 11,682 673 - 8 12,363 8.2% 14,192 5.92% (12,086) - - - Yucaipa Valley Water District YVWD 110 178 92 133 96 122 - - - 122 0.1% 140 0.06% (96) - - - Other Inside SBVWCD Other 5,473 5,915 5,836 5,203 6,320 5,749 376 - - 6,126 4.1% 7,032 2.93% (6,320) - - - Other Outside SBVWCD Other 1,323 995 922 843 873 991 - - - 991 0.7% 1,138 0.47% (873) - - - San Bernardino Entities Total: 123,258 139,048 127,769 143,455 142,486 135,203 6,580 4,731 3,961 150,474 100% 172,745 72.05% (142,486) 6,799 2,303 - Western Entities Total: - - - - - 66,998 66,998 27.95%
Total: 123,258 139,048 127,769 143,455 142,486 202,201 239,743 100% Agency Party Gap (AF) Water Use
(%)
Sustainability
(AF) Total Water (AF)
Credit for New
Recycled Water
(AF)
Credit for 50% of
Local Supplies for
Recharge (AF)
Total Water
after Credit (AF)
Estimated Total
Water Cost ($)
Proportion of
Total Pumping
Equitable O&M
Costs
Equitable Admin
Costs
Estimated Total
Party Costs ($)
Voting Weight
2023-2024
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company 0 0.1% 15 15 - 1,290 - -$ 0.04% 594$ -$ 594$ 0.0% City of Colton 0 2.2% 656 656 - - 656 77,683$ 1.1% 15,462$ -$ 93,145$ 2.8% City of Loma Linda 0 3.7% 1,120 1,120 - - 1,120 132,569$ 3.3% 46,146$ -$ 178,715$ 5.4% City of Redlands 0 22.2% 6,647 6,647 4,731 1,427 489 57,899$ 15.9% 225,832$ -$ 283,731$ 8.6% City of Rialto 0 4.4% 1,319 1,319 - 5 1,314 155,589$ 3.3% 47,423$ -$ 203,012$ 6.1% City of San Bernardino 0 29.8% 8,927 8,927 - 3 8,924 1,056,556$ 26.0% 368,652$ -$ 1,425,208$ 43.1% East Valley Water District 0 15.2% 4,561 4,561 - 1,227 3,334 394,790$ 7.8% 110,211$ -$ 505,001$ 15.3% Fontana Union Water Company 0 4.1% 1,229 1,229 - - 1,229 145,571$ 2.2% 30,586$ -$ 176,157$ 5.3% Loma Linda University 0 0.7% 222 222 - - 222 26,308$ 0.7% 9,412$ -$ 35,720$ 1.1% San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. 0 0.1% 20 20 - - 20 2,367$ 0.0% 9$ -$ 2,376$ 0.1% West Valley Water District 0 9.1% 2,730 2,730 - 8 2,722 322,265$ 5.4% 76,680$ -$ 398,945$ 12.1% Yucaipa Valley Water District 0 0.1% 27 27 - - 27 3,186$ 0.1% 852$ -$ 4,038$ 0.1% Total Purchased by GC Parties: 0 91.7% 27,473 27,473 4,731 3,961 20,057 2,374,783$ 65.72% 931,858$ -$ 3,306,641$ 100% Mountain View Power Co. 0 1.0% 296 296 - - 296 35,040$ 0.6% #N/A -$ 35,040$ #N/A Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 0 1.2% 373 373 - - 373 44,129$ 1.1% #N/A -$ 44,129$ #N/A San Bernardino County - Facility Management 29 0.7% 205 235 - - 235 27,775$ 0.7% #N/A -$ 27,775$ #N/A Terrace Water Company 0 0.2% 51 51 - - 51 6,038$ 0.0% #N/A -$ 6,038$ #N/A Other Inside SBVWCD 0 4.5% 1,353 1,353 - - 1,353 160,253$ 3.7% #N/A -$ 160,253$ #N/A Other Outside SBVWCD 0 0.7% 219 219 - - 219 25,931$ 0.1% #N/A -$ 25,931$ #N/A Non-Parties Total: 29 8.3% 2,497 2,527 - - 2,527 299,166$ 6.33% -$ -$ 299,166$ #N/A Western Entities Total: 0 0% - - - - - - 27.95% -$ -$ -$ #N/A Total: 29 100% 29,971 30,000 4,731 3,961 22,584 2,673,949$ 100% 931,858$ -$ 3,605,808$ #N/A Recycled WaterPresent Period Net SBBA GW + SW Prodcution (AF) Total (2023-24)Equitable O&M Costs
Present Period Safe Yield
Total Average Use, 2017-21(AF)
REVISED EAM - FY2023-24 Calculation
Equitable Water Costs
Safe Yield Distribution
Base Period Safe Yield
4/25/2023
22 4/25/2023
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
$-
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
Average SBBA Pumping (AF)
REVISED GC EAM 2023-2024 Fiscal Year
Annual O&M and SWP for Ultimate Sustainability (2040)
Party Gap ($) Sustainability ($) Equitable O&M Cost ($) Credit for Water ($) 2016-20 Average SBBA Pumping 23 Extraction Data and Adjustments
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
2324
25 26
27 28
29 3031
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE Recycled Water
(Data provided by
agencies)
Recycled Water
Base period Total 2021
Agency 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 AVG 2021 1959-63 2021 2017 2018 Bear Valley Mutual Water Company 24,597 20,706 19,405 18,864 15,632 16,396 11,550 14,414 18,526 11,062 - - - - - - - 1,012 974 882 574 - - - 2,805 669 City of Colton 2,814 3,606 3,305 3,743 3,267 3,842 3,695 2,943 2,624 1,743 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Loma Linda - - - - - 5,070 5,158 4,725 5,182 5,202 - - - - - 1,827 1,840 1,991 1,729 1,290 1,735 - 235 - - - City of Redlands 18,717 19,264 18,365 19,901 15,922 24,216 21,710 25,739 28,424 29,039 - 448 1 1 824 7,202 6,245 8,554 7,022 6,439 7,092 6,799 2,068 4,731 2,852 1,740 City of Rialto 1,659 795 959 1,068 1,397 3,885 4,413 3,560 3,897 4,868 1,692 1,998 2,372 1,720 1,445 959 827 875 1,033 470 833 - - - - - City of San Bernardino 17,268 16,099 18,448 17,575 16,456 38,478 40,158 37,875 40,504 43,290 (139) (635) (731) (886) (1,732) 4,111 3,704 3,633 3,070 2,821 3,468 - - - - - East Valley Water District 6,545 6,891 7,632 7,022 7,427 15,214 14,545 12,276 15,169 12,424 - - - - - 7,003 7,044 8,519 8,352 7,621 7,562 - - - 420 1,693 Fontana Union Water Company 19,841 15,649 13,295 14,674 12,086 4,112 5,147 6,045 6,424 6,094 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Loma Linda University 1,011 1,116 1,202 1,166 901 990 986 961 1,030 1,061 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mountain View Power Co. 1,410 1,219 1,425 726 744 1,889 863 1,251 1,674 1,020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 1,943 1,870 2,028 1,863 1,684 1,652 1,649 1,571 1,739 1,823 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino County - Facility Management 636 615 809 564 386 841 846 770 1,093 1,096 - - - - - 1,045 733 823 871 655 825 - - - - - San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. - - - - - 4,921 6,421 6,321 6,100 5,402 (4,921) (5,972) (6,320) (6,099) (5,401) - - - - - - - - - - - Terrace Water Company 1,318 921 1,077 1,012 899 464 343 205 141 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - West Valley Water District 13,584 12,090 13,587 11,331 11,837 7,108 6,966 9,361 10,066 8,892 3,368 4,040 4,065 4,713 3,194 - - - - - - - - - - - Yucaipa Valley Water District - - - - - 110 178 92 133 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Inside SBVWCD 67,682 64,704 70,511 65,354 60,528 5,473 5,915 5,836 5,203 6,320 - - - - - (18,509) (17,282) (22,440) (19,856) (17,735) (19,164) - - - - - Other Outside SBVWCD 11,218 8,562 8,989 10,240 8,563 1,323 995 922 843 873 - - - - - (3,638) (3,111) (2,967) (3,195) (2,443) (2,925) - - - - - Santa Ana River Recharge Balance (difference
between BVMWC diversion and use of SAR water) 17,472 3,422 492 2,561 708 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Entities Total: 190,243 174,107 181,037 175,103 157,729 153,456 134,960 135,359 151,333 141,014 - (121) (612) (551) (1,670) - - - - - (0) 6,799 2,303 4,731 6,077 4,102 City of Riverside 25,983 23,024 24,682 24,391 22,379 21,829 18,995 15,752 21,730 21,559 City of Riverside - Gage Canal 31,805 29,019 30,670 28,440 26,999 28,627 30,893 26,775 27,780 26,620 Meeks & Daley Water Compnay 7,282 8,037 9,399 7,560 7,854 7,218 7,217 7,444 6,537 7,736 Regents of University of California 558 546 658 564 425 554 554 554 554 554 Riverside Highland Water Co. 4,745 4,241 5,535 4,147 3,326 1,903 2,641 2,938 3,498 3,651 Western Entities Total: 70,373 64,867 70,944 65,102 60,983 60,131 60,300 53,463 60,099 60,120 Total: 260,616 238,974 251,981 240,205 218,712 213,587 195,260 188,822 211,432 201,134 Agency 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Bear Valley Mutual Water Company - - - - - 466 144 101 518 83 466 144 101 518 83 City of Colton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Loma Linda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Redlands - - - - - 129 - - 290 - 129 - - 290 - City of Rialto 2,428 - 526 526 - - - - - - 2,428 - 526 526 - City of San Bernardino 9,185 - - - - 5,816 - - - - 15,001 - - - - East Valley Water District 1,704 - - - - 297 522 2,219 852 1,849 2,001 522 2,219 852 1,849 Fontana Union Water Company - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Loma Linda University - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mountain View Power Co. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino County - Facility Management - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Terrace Water Company - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - West Valley Water District 1,250 - 1,210 904 - - - - - - 1,250 - 1,210 904 - Yucaipa Valley Water District - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Inside SBVWCD - - - - - 941 632 29 32 247 941 632 29 32 247 Other Outside SBVWCD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Entities Total: 14,567 - 1,736 1,430 - 7,649 1,298 2,349 1,692 2,179 22,216 1,298 4,085 3,122 2,179 Agency 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Bear Valley Mutual Water Company - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Colton - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Loma Linda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Redlands - - - - - - - - - - 7,047 6,913 3,615 8,973 4,451 6,635 2,762 5,319 4,871 4,405 City of Rialto 624 626 625 587 624 1,241 1,002 1,396 1,583 967 - - - - - - - - - - City of San Bernardino 1,069 994 1,286 1,403 1,279 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East Valley Water District - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fontana Union Water Company 8,484 5,833 4,358 8,526 6,239 3,419 1,543 3,609 5,918 2,646 - - - - - - - - - - Loma Linda University - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mountain View Power Co. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino County - Facility Management - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Terrace Water Company - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - West Valley Water District 4,259 2,766 2,424 4,393 4,097 2,442 2,549 5,897 5,112 3,442 - - - - - - - - - - Yucaipa Valley Water District - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Inside SBVWCD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,782 352 1,331 354 335 Other Outside SBVWCD - - - - - 595 755 622 711 676 - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Entities Total: 14,436 10,219 8,693 14,909 12,239 7,697 5,849 11,524 13,324 7,731 7,047 6,913 3,615 8,973 4,451 8,417 3,114 6,650 5,225 4,740 Agency 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 Bear Valley Mutual Water Company 12,690 9,573 6,781 6,954 5,722 10,320 10,181 6,925 12,175 13,448 10,320 10,181 6,925 12,175 13,448 North Fork Water 7,081 6,446 4,761 6,381 5,047 City of Colton - - - - - - - - - - City of Redlands 117 78 70 103 173 City of Loma Linda - - - - - - - - - - Bear Valley Mutu 12,424 9,403 6,585 6,774 5,616 City of Redlands 661 677 371 857 754 4,634 6,592 5,038 5,796 2,163 4,147 7,066 300 3,080 8,274 Total SAR Diversio 19,622 15,927 11,416 13,258 10,836 City of Rialto - - - - - - - - - - City of San Bernardino - - - - - - - - - - Bear Valley Alder 266 170 196 180 106 East Valley Water District 0 9 42 122 113 6,593 5,444 4,867 5,659 5,291 12 39 15 208 67 Bear Valley Wells 4709 4609 7791 5156 4690 Fontana Union Water Company - - - - - - - - - - 4975 4779 7987 5336 4796 Loma Linda University - - - - - - - - - - Mountain View Power Co. - - - - - - - - - - 3,439 4,149 4,035 3,203 4,233 Redlands Tunnel 544 599 301 754 581 Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino County - Facility Management - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. - - - - - - - - - - Terrace Water Company - - - - - - - - - - 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 West Valley Water District - - - - - - - - - - 9,957 5,836 12,500 13,519 10,463 Yucaipa Valley Water District - - - - - - - - - - Other Inside SBVWCD 7,081 6,437 4,718 6,259 4,933 - - - - - Other Outside SBVWCD - - - - - - - - - - San Bernardino Entities Total: 20,432 16,696 11,913 14,192 11,523 21,547 22,216 16,830 23,630 20,902 Source: Watermaster and BVMWC
Lytle Creek
Source: See surface water tab for individual sources
Santa Ana River
Verified Total Extractions
Source: 2021 Watermaster Report Volume 1 Table 3
(BVMWC Volume 1 Table 1, Volume 1A Table 1, BBWM Report) SWP Spreading Delivery
Source: SBVMWD SWP Orders and Accounting
SWP Direct Delivery
Source: SBVMWD SWP Orders and Accounting
Source: 1971 Watermaster Report Summary of Extractions (Filed and Nonfiled) in the SBBA by Non-Plaintiffs for use in SB County Base Period Santa Ana River Diversion
Credits for Recycled Water to the Basin Excess Surfac
So
Source: EVWD Operations
Source: See surface water tab for individual sourcesSource: See surface water tab for individual sources Total Bear Valley Santa Ana River
All In Lieu Water
Redlands Cooley Hat Data
Source: Watermaster Volume 1 Table 1
City of Redlands
Other Distribution Verified Extractions
Source: 2020 Watermaster Report Volume 1 Change in Ownership from Base Period
TOTAL SWP Water
Source: SBVMWD SWP Orders and Accounting
Bear Valley Santa Ana River
Pumping Adjustments
Source: Performed by SBVMWD
Mill Creek
Source: See surface water tab for individual sources
Bear Valley Wells
EVWD Surface Actual Deliveries
Source: SBVMWD In-Lieu Calcualtion Table
Source: Watermaster Volume 1 Table 1
4/25/2023
24 Agency None
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company -$
City of Colton -$
City of Loma Linda -$
City of Redlands -$
City of Rialto -$
City of San Bernardino -$
East Valley Water District -$
Fontana Union Water Company -$
Loma Linda University -$
San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. -$
West Valley Water District -$
Yucaipa Valley Water District -$
Total GC Parties: -$
Mountain View Power Co. -$
Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 -$
San Bernardino County - Facility Management -$
Terrace Water Company -$
Other Inside SBVWCD -$
Other Outside SBVWCD -$
San Bernardino Non-Parties Total: -$
Western Entities Total: -$
Total: -$
Notes
Corrections for Previous Years
4/25/2023
25 Agency New Recycled
Water (AF)
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company -
City of Colton -
City of Loma Linda -
City of Redlands 4,731
City of Rialto -
City of San Bernardino -
East Valley Water District -
Fontana Union Water Company -
Loma Linda University -
San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. -
West Valley Water District -
Yucaipa Valley Water District -
Total GC Parties: 4,731
Mountain View Power Co. -
Muscoy Mutual Water Company No. 1 -
San Bernardino County - Facility Management -
Terrace Water Company -
Other Inside SBVWCD -
Other Outside SBVWCD -
San Bernardino Non-Parties Total: -
Western Entities Total: -
Total: 4,731
Recycled Water
Credit for Water Brought to the Basin
Redlands - Credit for Recycled water either for recharge or delivered to Edison. 2,068AF of recycled water was present in the base period and is subtracted from the total. Data provided by the agency.
4/25/2023
26 GC Parties
FY23-24
Water Cost
($)
FY23-24
Water Cost
(AF)
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company -$ 0
City of Colton 77,683$ 656
City of Loma Linda 132,569$ 1120
City of Redlands 57,899$ 489
City of Rialto 155,589$ 1314
City of San Bernardino 1,056,556$ 8924
East Valley Water District 394,790$ 3334
Fontana Union Water Company 145,571$ 1229
Loma Linda University 26,308$ 222
San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. 2,367$ 20
West Valley Water District 322,265$ 2722
Yucaipa Valley Water District 3,186$ 27
Total GC Parties: 2,374,783$ 20057
SBB GC Water Charge FY2023-24
27 GC Parties
FY23-24
O&M Cost
(AF)
Bear Valley Mutual Water Company 594$
City of Colton 15,462$
City of Loma Linda 46,146$
City of Redlands 225,832$
City of Rialto 47,423$
City of San Bernardino 368,652$
East Valley Water District 110,211$
Fontana Union Water Company 30,586$
Loma Linda University 9,412$
San Bernardino Valley M.W.D. 9$
West Valley Water District 76,680$
Yucaipa Valley Water District 852$
Total GC Parties: 931,858$
SBB GC O&M Charge FY2023-24
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-630, Version: 1, Agenda #:
For Water Subcommittee Meeting [June 28, 2023]
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Thomas J. Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
Amendment Number No. 1 to the Marketing License Agreement with Service Line Warranty of America, Inc.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past year, our Service Line Warranty of America, Inc. (SLWA) legal and compliance team has been in the process of reviewing our California programs in their entirety. This was, in part, prompted by additional regulatory guidance from the California Department of Insurance (CDI) which governs home protection contracts in CA; this is what our HomeServe/SLWA service plans fall under.
SLWA wanted to update the City on the outcome of that internal review as well as their discussions with CDI, including an expected settlement with CDI, and the resulting changes to our program.
Below are the two changes being required to the program:
1. Direct marketing and website changes are intended to ensure that program materials are not potentially viewed or construed as the City is soliciting the SLWA offered plans, which has been the intent all along. CDI’sposition is that unless a party has a home protection license to operate, they can only announce to their residents the plans offered by SLWA and refer customers to SLWA for specific plan details and descriptions. This is how the City is promoting the program currently.
2. SLWA will need to restructure the compensation provisions in our marketing agreement so that the royalty is no longer calculated per service plan. There will be a change to the license fee that changes from a royalty-fee ($0.75 product/month) based on resident participation to a flat fee of $7,200 paid to the City of Rialto annually, with the first payment beginning in January 2024.
Attached is the original agreement and proposes amendment, Attachment 1 and 2 respectively.
As of February 2023, there has been a total of 799 policies covering 403 customers. Approximately
1.5% of the residence have enrolled. 201 claims have been filed saving residence $129,000.
Attachment 3 is fact sheet of the program at a glance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact resulting from this amendment is a flat fee of $7,200 annually based upon the City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
61 File #: WS-23-630, Version: 1, Agenda #:
current resident participation.
Operating Budget Impact
No impact to the operating budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the Water Subcommittee recommend the City Council and Rialto Utility Authority approve Amendment Number No. 1 to the Marketing License Agreement with Service Line Warranty of America, Inc.
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
62 01180.0009/449890.5
MARKETING AGREEMENT
This MARKETING AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of April 24, 2018 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Rialto/Rialto Utility Authority (“RUA”), and Service Line Warranties of America, Inc. (“Company”), herein collectively referred to singularly as "Party" and collectively as the "Parties".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, sewer and water line laterals between the mainlines and the connection on residential private property are owned by individual residential property owners residing in the City ("Residential Property Owner"); and
WHEREAS, RUA desires to offer Residential Property Owners the opportunity, but not the obligation, to purchase a service line warranty and other similar products set forth in Exhibit A or as otherwise agreed in writing from time-to-time by the Parties (each, a “Product” and collectively, the "Products"); and
WHEREAS, Company is the administrator of the National League of Cities Service Line Warranty Program and has agreed to make the Products available to Residential Property Owners subject to the terms and conditions contained herein; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and with the intent to be legally bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Purpose. RUA hereby grants to Company the right to offer and market the Products to Residential Property Owners subject to the terms and conditions herein.
2. Grant of License. RUA hereby grants to Company a non-exclusive license ("License") to use the City of Rialto's name and logo on letterhead, advertising, and marketing materials to be sent to Residential Property Owners from time to time, and to be used in advertising (including on the Company’s website), all at Company's sole cost and expense and subject to RUA's prior review and approval, which will not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed, or withheld.
Company shall have no right to use the City of Rialto's name or logo for any other purposes not specifically provided for in this Agreement. RUA agrees that it will not extend a similar license to any competitor of Company during the Term and any Renewal Term of this Agreement.
3. Term. The term of this Agreement ("Term") shall be for three (3) years from the Effective Date. The Agreement will automatically renew for three (3) additional one (1) year terms ("Renewal Term") unless one of the Parties gives the other written notice at least ninety (90) days prior to end of the Term or of a Renewal Term that the Party does not intend to renew this Agreement. In the event that Company is in material breach of this Agreement, RUA may DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 63 01180.0009/449890.5
terminate this Agreement thirty (30) days after giving written notice to Company of such breach, if said breach is not cured during said thirty (30) day period. Company will be permitted to complete any marketing initiative, not constituting or contributing to a breach of this Agreement, that is initiated or planned prior to termination of this Agreement, after which time, neither Party will have any further obligations to the other and this Agreement will terminate.
4. Consideration. As consideration for such license, Company will pay to RUA a License Fee as set forth in Exhibit A ("License Fee") during the term of this Agreement. The first payment shall be due by January 30th of the year following the conclusion of first year of the Term. Succeeding License Fee payments shall be made on an annual basis throughout the Term and any Renewal Term, due and payable on January 30th of the succeeding year. RUA will have the right, at its sole expense, to conduct an audit, upon reasonable notice and during normal business hours, of Company's books and records pertaining to any fees due or any other performance under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect and for one (1) year after any termination of this Agreement. Company shall provide quarterly reports to RUA detailing the number of enrollments and the number of claims filed by Residential Property Owners.
5. Indemnification. Company hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold RUA, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively or individually, "Indemnitee") harmless from and against any and all third party claims, damages, losses, expenses, suits, actions, decrees, judgments, awards, reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs (individually or collectively, "Claim"), which an Indemnitee may suffer or which may be sought against or are recovered or obtainable from an Indemnitee, as a result of or arising out of this Agreement with Company, or any negligent or fraudulent act or omission of Company or its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of services under this Agreement or the Products; provided that the applicable Indemnitee notifies Company of any such Claim within a time that does not prejudice the ability of Company to defend against such Claim. Any Indemnitee hereunder may participate in its, his, or her own defense, but will be responsible for all costs incurred, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in connection with such participation in such defense. Such indemnification shall not cover any Claim due to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of RUA.
6. Insurance. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a Certificate of Insurance documenting the insurance program for Company. Company agrees that it will cause the City of Rialto/Rialto Utility Authority to be made an additional insured under all applicable insurance policies.
Company further agrees that it will provide RUA with thirty (30) days’ advance written notice of any change to its insurance program that results in a material reduction of coverage.
7. Notice. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed to have been given when notice is (i) received by the Party to whom it is directed by personal service, (ii) sent by electronic mail (provided confirmation of receipt is provided by the receiving Party), or (iii) deposited as registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, with the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows:
DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 64 01180.0009/449890.5
T o : R UA:
ATTN: Rialto Utility Authority
c/o City of Rialto
150 South Palm Avenue
Rialto, CA 92376-6487
Phone: (909) 820-2525
To: Company:
ATTN: Chief Sales Officer
Utility Service Partners Private Label, Inc.
11 Grandview Circle, Suite 100
Canonsburg, PA 15317
Phone: (866) 974-4801
8. Modifications or Amendments/Entire Agreement. Any and all of the representations and obligations of the Parties are contained herein, and no amendments or other modifications of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both Parties hereto, or their respective successors, assigns, or grantees.
9. Assignment. This Agreement and the License granted herein may not be assigned by Company, other than to an affiliate or an acquirer of all or substantially all of its assets with thirty (30) days prior written notice to RUA, without the prior written consent of RUA, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
10. Relationship of the Parties. The Parties are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No Party to this Agreement shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other Party unless expressly provided to the contrary by this Agreement. No employee, agent, or officer of a Party shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee, or officer of another Party.
11. Covenant Against Discrimination. Company covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of services related to this Agreement. Company shall take affirmative action to insure that employees and independent contractors are treated without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.
12. Unauthorized Aliens. Company hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ or independently contract unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Company so employ or independently contract such unauthorized aliens for the performance of services related to this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against RUA for such use of unauthorized aliens, DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 65 01180.0009/449890.5
Company hereby agrees to and shall reimburse RUA for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by RUA.
13. Counterparts/Electronic Delivery; No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all such counterparts will constitute the same contract and the signature of any Party to any counterpart will be deemed a signature to, and may be appended to, any other counterpart. Executed copies hereof may be delivered by facsimile or e-mail and upon receipt will be deemed originals and binding upon the Parties hereto, regardless of whether originals are delivered thereafter. Nothing expressed or implied in this Agreement is intended, or should be construed, to confer upon or give any person or entity not a party to this agreement any third- party beneficiary rights, interests, or remedies under or by reason of any term, provision, condition, undertaking, warranty, representation, or agreement contained in this Agreement.
14. Choice of Law/Attorney Fees. The governing law shall be the laws of the State of California. In the event that at any time during the Term or any Renewal Term either Party institutes any action or proceeding against the other relating to the provisions of this Agreement or any default hereunder, then the unsuccessful Party shall be responsible for the reasonable expenses of such action including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred therein by the successful Party.
15. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits. The above Recitals and Exhibit A attached hereto are incorporated by this reference and expressly made part of this Agreement.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 66 01180.0009/449890.5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above.
RUA:
CITY OF RIALTO/RIALTO UTILITY
AUTHORITY, a municipal corporation
ATTEST:
By:_
Barbara McGee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
By:_
Fred Galante, City Attorney
By:
Deborah Robertson, Mayor
COMPANY:
UTILITY SERVICE PARTNERS PRIVATE
LABEL, INC.
By:
Michael Backus, Chief Sales Officer
DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 67 01180.0009/449890.5
EXHIBIT A
NLC Service Line Warranty Program
City of Rialto/Rialto Utility Authority
Term Sheet
November 6, 2017
I. Initial Term. Three (3) years
II. License Fee. $0.75 per Product for each month that a Product is in force for a Residential Property Owner (and for which payment is received by Company), aggregated and paid annually, for:
a. License to use the City of Rialto’s name and logo on letterhead, advertising, and marketing materials
III. Products.
a. External sewer/septic line warranty (initially, $9.75 per month; $112.00 annually) b. External water service line warranty (initially, $6.75 per month; $76.00 annually) c. In-home plumbing warranty (initially, $9.99 per month; $114.99 annually)
Company may adjust the foregoing Product fees with notice to the Residential Property Owners that have contracted Company’s services; provided, that any such adjustment shall not exceed $.50 per month in any 12-month period, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing.
IV. Scope of Coverage.
a. External sewer/septic line warranty: Scope is from the main tap until line daylights inside home, which includes the service line under the concrete floor. (Covers septic lines if applicable)
b. External water service line warranty: Scope is from the meter and/or curb box until it daylights inside home, which includes the service line under the concrete floor. (Covers well service lines if applicable)
c. In-home plumbing warranty: Scope covers residential in-home water supply lines and in-home sewer lines and all drain lines connected to the main sewer stack that are broken or leaking inside the home after the point of entry. Coverage includes broken or leaking water, sewer, or drain lines that may be embedded under the slab or basement floor. Coverage also includes repair of clogged toilets.
V. Marketing Campaigns. Company shall have the right to conduct up to three campaigns per year, comprised of up to six mailings per year, and such other channels as may be mutually agreed. Initially, Company anticipates offering the In-home plumbing warranty Product via in-bound channels only.
DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 68 01180.0009/449890.5
EXHIBIT B
Certificate of Insurance
DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 69 Holder Identifier : 7777777707070700077761616045571110766706234026755307661017440635311071461577367303320760417010662111207573732567166674070533764731677720704101646637556007251374232244030076727242035772000777777707000707007 7777777707070700073525677115456000766001502463457507671005560733126074233367060330040743623365317740007122633316122015070222273521621100712223735217211107023337342073001077756163351765540777777707000707007 Certificate No : 570069767468
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE(MM/DD/YYYY )
12/29/2017
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATI ON ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AM END, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE P OLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONST ITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AU THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
PRODUCER
Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc.
Stamford CT Office
1600 Summer Street
Stamford CT 06907-4907 USA
PHONE
(A/C. No. Ext):
E-MAIL
ADDRESS :
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
(866) 283-7122
INSURED 16624 Allied World Specialty Insurance Company INSURER A :
10690 Allied World National Assurance Company INSURER B :
30830 Arch Indemnity Insurance Company INSURER C :
11150 Arch Insurance Company INSURER D :
INSURER E :
INSURER F :
FAX
(A/C. No .): (800) 363-0105
CONTACT
NAME:
Utility Service Partners, Inc.
11 Grandview CIR Ste 100
Canonsburg PA 15317-6508 USA COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER :570069767468 REVISION NUMBER :
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH R ESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSUR ANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS S UBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES . LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS . Limits shown are as requested
POLICY EXP
(MM /DD /YYYY )
POLICY EFF
(MM /DD /YYYY )
SUBR
WVD
INSR
LTR
ADDL
INSD POLICY NUMBER TYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
POLICY LOC
EACH OCCURRENCE
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence )
MED EXP (Any one person )
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
GENERAL AGGREGATE
PRODUCTS - COMP /OP AGG
X
X
X
GEN 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER :
$2,000,000
$100,000
$5,000
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000
B 03/31/2017 03/31/2018 03100758
PRO-
JECT
OTHER :
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
OWNED
AUTOS ONLY
SCHEDULED
AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
ONLY
NON-OWNED
AUTOS ONLY
BODILY INJURY ( Per person)
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
X
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
$1,000,000 A 03/31/2017 03/31/2018
AOS
0310-0759
A 03/31/2017 03/31/2018
MA
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
6000-0216
EXCESS LIAB
X OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE
EACH OCCURRENCE
DED
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
$10,000
03/31/2017 UMBRELLA LIAB B 03/31/2018 03106305
RETENTION X
X
E.L. DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$1,000,000
X OTH-
ER
PER
STATUTE
D
12/31/2017 03/31/2018
AOS
14WCI8946101
C 12/31/2017 03/31/2018
$1,000,000
Y / N
(Mandatory in NH)
ANY PROPRIETOR / PARTNER / EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / AN
CA, KY, NY, TX
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
$1,000,000
11WCI8946001
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Evidence of Insurance.
CANCELLATION CERTIFICATE HOLDER
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Utility Service Partners, Inc.
11 Grandview Circle, Suite 100
Canonsburg PA 15317-6508 USA
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCE LLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS .
DocuSign Envelope ID: CA37B6AB-2E0E-4C72-91AF-024DFBCCA8E9 70 1
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO MARKETING LICENSE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT: ______________
THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (“Amendment No. 1”) to the MARKETING LICENSE AGREEMENT dated as of April 24, 2018 (“Agreement”), is by and between Service Line Warranties of America, Inc. (“Service Line Warranties”), Utility Service Partners Private Label, Inc. d/b/a SLWA Insurance Services (“USPPL”, and together with Service Line Warranties, “SLWA”) and City of Rialto/Rialto Utility Authority (“RUA”). Each of Service Line Warranties, USPPL and RUA are referred to herein singularly as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 1 not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement as stipulated herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises as set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Utility Service Partners Private Label , Inc d/b/a SLWA Insurance Services is hereby added as a Party to the Agreement.
2. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“4. Consideration. As consideration for such license, SLWA will pay to RUA an annual License Fee of Seven Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($7,200) ("License Fee") for each contract y ear commencing after the earlier to occur of (i) the effective date of Amendment No. 1 hereto and (ii) July 1, 2023 . Payment of the License Fee is subject to RUA’s timely approval of all marketing materials for the prior contract year and the approval and mailing of the first campaign of the then current contract year. SLWA will pay the applicable License Fee to RUA within thirty (30) days aft er such campaign mailings have been made and applicable RUA approvals secured.”
3. Section 7 of the Agreement is hereby amended by changing SLWA’s address for notices under the Agreement to read as follows:
“SLWA:
ATTN: Chief Growth Officer
Utility Service Partners Private Label, Inc.
601 Merritt 7, 6th Floor
Norwalk, CT 06851
Phone: (203) 840-8276”
4. Section II of Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the first line thereof and replacing it with the following:
71 2
“II. Annual License Fee – $7,200 for each contract year of the Term commencing after the earlier to occur of (i) the effective date of Amendment No. 1 hereto and (ii) July 1, 2023 , for:”
Except as otherwise modified or amended by this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions, terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the Effective Date set forth above.
SERVICE LINE WARRANTIES OF
AMERICA, INC.
By: _______________________________
Printed Name: _______________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________
CITY OF RIALTO/RIALTO UTILITY
AUTHORITY, a municipal corporation
By: _______________________________
Printed Name: _______________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________
UTILITY SERVICE PARTNERS PRIVATE
LABEL, INC. D/B/A SLWA INSURANCE
SERVICES
By: _______________________________
Printed Name: _______________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________
72 at a Glance
• Founded in 1993 in the UK, expanding to the US in
2003
• Over 1,110 municipal, utility and association partners • Over 4.8M customers; Over 8.5M contracts in the US
• Administers the NLC Line Warranty Program
• Customizable Program: Enables customizable and collaborative marketing efforts on program offers and materials.
• Contractor Standards: Ensuresthat all work is done by local,licensed,insuredcontractorswith the appropriatepermits.
• HomeServe Cares : We are committed to putting people at the heart of everything we do, and that includes our corporate social responsibility. We actively support and care for People, Communities, Veterans and the Common Good, both locally and nationwide.
Partnership FastFacts
CUSTOMER
SAVINGS
CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
HOMEOWNERS
ENROLLED
CLAIMS
SERVICED
TOTAL
POLICIES
CUSTOMERS
COVERED
HomeServe is honored to continue bringing your residents affordable home repair solutions and superior service.
Asa Fray, Account Manager
Phone: 615-587-1573
[email protected]
Justin Steinbugl, Senior Account Manager
Phone: 412-514-2673
[email protected]
As of February 2023
Contacts
799 201 1.5%
403 $129K 5/5
73 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-624, Version: 1, Agenda #:
For Utilities Commission Meeting [June 28, 2023]
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
FROM: Thomas J. Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
Nicole Hemmans, Senior Administrative Analysist
Request for the Water Subcommittee to approve of the 2022 Consumer Confidence Drinking Water Report and Recommend the Rialto City Council Receive and File the Report. (ACTION)
BACKGROUND:
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires water systems to deliver a Consumer Confidence Report (CCR), also known as an annual drinking water quality report, to their customers. The purpose of the CCR is to provide customers with information on the City of Rialto’s drinking water quality and allow them to make health-based decisions on drinking water consumption.
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:
All of the water quality data collected by our water system for 2022 is summarized in the City of Rialto 2022 Consumer Confidence Reports which states that the City has either met or exceeded the standards set by the State and Federal Law.
CCR reports must be sent to customers and the state of California by July 1 of each year and contains the following information:
· The source of the drinking water;
· A brief summary of the risk of contamination of the local drinking water source; · The regulated contaminant found in local drinking water; · The potential health effects of any contaminant detected in violation of an EPA health standard;
· An accounting of the system's actions to restore safe drinking water; · An educational statement for vulnerable populations about avoiding Cryptosporidium.
Cryptosporidium, as defined by Wikipedia, is a genus of apicomplexan parasitic alveolates that can cause a respiratory and gastrointestinal illness (cryptosporidiosis); · Educational information on nitrate, arsenic, or lead in areas where these contaminants may be City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
74 File #: WS-23-624, Version: 1, Agenda #:
a concern;
· Phone numbers of additional sources of information, including the water system; · EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline number 1-800-426-4791.
The 2022 edition of the CCR is included as Attachment 1.
If approved by the Subcommittee, this item will be presented to the City Council as a receive and file item.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget Impact
As the primary method of distribution is the website, the financial impact associated with the CCR is minimal and generally limited to printing and distribution costs associated with having the CCR printed for distribution at city offices.
Capital Improvement Budget Impact
There will not be an impact to the Capital Improvement Budget with the proposed action.
RECOMMENDATION:
Request for the Water Subcommittee to approve the 2022 Consumer Confidence Drinking Water Report and recommend City Council receive and file the report.
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
75 2022 Annual
Drinking Water
Quality Report
(Consumer Confidence Report)
City of Rialto, California
Este informe contiene información muy importante
acerca del Agua Potable. Tradúzcalo o hable con
alguien que lo entienda bien.
CITY COUNCIL AND ELECTED OFFICIALS
Deborah Robertson, Mayor
Andy Carrizales, Mayor Pro Tem
Rafael Trujillo, Councilmember
Ed Scott, Councilmember
Joe Baca Sr., Councilmember
Edward Carrillo, City Treasurer
Barbara McGee, City Clerk
UTILITIES COMMISSION
Barbara Rickman, Chair
June Hayes, Vice-Chair
Kevin Kobbe, Commissioner
Richard Chitwood, Commissioner
James Shields, Commissioner
CITY EXECUTIVE STAFF
Arron Brown , Acting City Manager
Thomas Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
437 N. Riverside Ave
Rialto, CA 92376
(909) 820-0400
Operated by
PRSRT STD
ECRWSS
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
SAN BERNARDINO, CA
PERMIT NO. 1506
76 Annual Drinking Water Report
The purpose of this report is to provide information about the quality of the water delivered to customers this past year of 2022. This report is mandated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and we believe it is your right to know where your water comes from and what it cont ains. We are happy to report that we have consistently delivered water that has met or exceeded the standards set by State and Federal Law. More information about cont aminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1(800) 426-4791. For information regarding this Consumer Confidence Report please conta ct David Terry, Project Manager —Veolia. (909) 820-0400.
About Rialto Water Services
The City of Rialto and Rialto Utility Authority (RUA), in partnership with Rialto Water Services (RWS) formed a public- private partnership to execute a 30 year water and wastewater concession. RWS is a partnership between Table Rock Capital and the Union Labor Life Insurance Company (Ullico). RWS contracts with Veolia North America to operate the water and wastewater systems.
Under the Concession Agreement, the City retains full ownership of the water and wastewater systems, retains all water rights and supply, and possesses the rate-setting authority associated with the facilities. RWS provides financial backing, oversight and concession services while Veolia delivers all water and wastewater services, including billing and customer service, and oversees a $41 million capital improvement program to upgrade aging facilities.
OUR MISSION:
Rialto Water Services, operated by Veolia, is
committed to the long-term performance,
safety, customer and community
satisfaction, and lasting cost and energy
efficiencies of Rialto’s water and wastewater
systems, on behalf of the City’s residents.
Customer Service: (909) 820-2546
Emergency After Hours: (909) 820-0400
On the Web: www.rialtowater.com
EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline: (800) 426-4791
FACTS ABOUT OUR WATER SYSTEM
In 2022, 75% of our total potable drinking water was
sourced from our ground water basins, 16% from the
Baseline Feeder (BLF) and 9% was surface water.
Number of Water Service Connections = 11,996
Miles of Water Main = 186.5
Number of Producing Wells = 6
Total Reservoir Capacity = 28 million gallons
Maximum Daily Production = 13.291 million gallons
Minimum Daily Production = 2.281 million gallons
Average Daily Production = 7.896 million gallons
Total Annual Production = 2.882 billion gallons
77 What is surface water?
It is any water that travels or is stored on top of the ground.
This would be the water that is in rivers, lakes, streams, oceans--even though we can’t drink salt water. Sometimes surface water sinks into the ground and becomes ground
water. Surface water is treated before it becomes drinking water.
What is ground water?
Any water that is under ground is ground water. In the
water cycle, some of the precipitation sinks into the
ground and goes into watersheds, aquifers and springs.
Ground water flows through layers of sand, clay, rock, and gravel which cleans the water. Ground water stays cleaner than water on the surface and does not need as much
treatment as surface water.
Perchlorate Information
Rialto has a zero tolerance policy regarding water that contains detectable levels of perchlorate.
We currently have wellhead treatment on two of our
wells for the removal of perchlorate. This wellhead
treatment removes the perchlorate to a non-detection
level. The other wells affected by perchlorate
contamination have been out of service and have not
been used since the detection occurred. These
responses, especially the installation of ion exchange
water treatment systems, have produced a measure of
success that has allowed the City to reliably deliver
potable water to all of its customers.
The City of Rialto urges all of its residents to continue conserving water and to look for new ways to reduce
the demand in our system. The City of Rialto continues
to work with those responsible for the contamination
to remediate perchlorate contamination in the water
supply.
Contaminants That May be Present in
Source Water:
Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems,
agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife.
Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally-occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming.
Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff and residential uses.
Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and
volatile organic chemicals, which are byproducts of
industrial processes and petroleum production, and can, also, come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff,
and septic systems.
Radioactive contaminants can naturally occur or be the
result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
Contaminants Expected in Drinking
Water
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some
contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not
necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the U.S. EPS’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791).
People Most Vulnerable To
Contaminants
Some people may be more vulnerable t o contaminants in
drinking water than the general population. Immune -
compromised persons such as persons with cancer
undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone
organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune disorders, some elderly, and in fants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about
drinking water from their health care providers. U.S.
EPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on
appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by
Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are
available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1 -800-426- 4791).
Contaminant Information
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children.
Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and
components associated with service lines and home plumbing.
The City of Rialto is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of mate rials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead
exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you do so, you may wish to collect the flushed water and reuse it for another beneficial purpose, such as watering plants. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at
hhtp://www.epa.gov/lead.
78 CITY OF RIALTO WATER QUALITY RESULTS FOR 2022
The State allows us to monitor for some contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently.
Some of our data, though representative, are more than one year old.
PRIMARY STANDARDS - MANDATORY HEALTH -RELATED STANDARDS
Parameter
Sample Date
Units
MCL
PHG
(MCLG)
Range
Average
Water Source
Major Sources in Drinking Water
City
of
Rialto
West
Valley
Water
District
(WVWD)
San
Bernardino
Valley
Municipal
Water
District (BLF)
City of San
Bernardino
Encanto
via BLF
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS
Total Coliform
Bacteria
(Total Coliform
Rule)
2022
Present/
Absent
(P/A)
Presence
of
Coliform
Bacteria
in 5% of
Monthly
Samples
(0) 0-6 1 1 0 N/A Naturally present in the environment
Fecal Coliform
and E. Coli
(Total Coliform
Rule)
2022
Present/
Absent
(P/A)
Presence
of Total
Coliform
or E. Coli
in a
repeat
sample
(0) 0 0 0 0 N/A Human and animal feces
RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINANTS
Gross Alpha
2020 (pCi/L) 15 (0)
Range 2.14-3.71 ND-3.9 ND-4.6
N/A Erosion of natural deposits
Average 3.46 3.1 3.2
Uranium
2017 (pCi/L) 20 0.43 Range 1.45-4.56 NR 1.8-3.2
N/A Erosion of natural deposits
Average 2.46 17 2.5
Combined
Radium
226/228
2017
(pCi/L) 5 (0)
Range ND-0.145 0.60-1.8 NR
N/A Erosion of natural deposits
Average 0.072 1.3 2.4
INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Arsenic
2020 µg/L 10 0.004 Range ND-3.1 0.70-3.9 ND-2.9
N/A
Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from
orchards; glass and electronics production
wastes Average 0.52 1.96 ND
Barium
2020 mg/L 1 2 Range ND-0.05 0.021-0.03 0.06-0.063
N/A Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal
refineries; erosion of natural deposits
Average 0.021 0.026 0.062
Fluoride
2020 mg/L 2 1
Range 0.20-0.26 0.15-0.40 0.38-1.1
N/A
Erosion of natural deposits; water additive that
promotes strong teeth; discharge from fertilizer
and aluminum factories Average 0.23 0.28 0.56
Hexavalent
Chromium
2013
µg/L N/A 0.02
Range * ND ND
N/A
Discharge from electroplating factories, leather
tanneries, wood preservation, chemical synthesis,
refractory production, and textile manufacturing
facilities; erosion of natural deposits. Average * ND ND Chromium
(Total)
2020
µg/L 50 (100)
Range ND-3.0
* * N/A
Discharge from electroplating factories, leather
tanneries, wood preservation, chemical synthesis,
refractory production, and textile manufacturing
facilities; erosion of natural deposits. Average 1.05
Nitrate (as N)
2022 mg/L 10 10
Range 1.3-3.4 0.19-0.51 3.0-5.1
N/A
Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching
from septic tanks and sewage; erosion of natural
deposits. Average 2.9 0.33 3.7
Perchlorate
2021 µg/L 6 1
Range ND ND NR
N/A
Perchlorate is an organic chemical used in solid rocket propellant, fireworks, explosives, flares, matches, and a variety of industries. It usually gets into drinking
water as a result of environmental contamination
from historic aerospace or other industrial operations
that used or use, store, or dispose of perchlorate and
its salts.
Average ND ND ND
Selenium
2020 mg/L 50 30
Range ND ND-0.0012 ND
N/A
Discharge from petroleum, glass, and metal
refineries; erosion of natural deposits; discharge
from mines and chemical
manufacturers; runoff from livestock lots (feed
additive) Average ND 0.0012 ND
79 SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS INCLUDING PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES 1,2,3-
Trichloropropane
(TCP)
2022
µg/L 0.005 0.0007
Range ND
ND ND N/A Discharge from metal degreasing sites and other factories Average ND
VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Tetrachloroethylene
(PCE)
2021
µg/L 5 0.06 Range * * 0.69-0.82
N/A Discharge from factories, dry cleaners, and auto
shops (metal degreaser) Average * * 0.73
Trichloroethylene
(TCE)
2013
µg/L 5 1.7
Range ND-0.72 ND ND
N/A Discharge from metal degreasing sites and other
factories
Average .36 ND ND
Perfluorooctane
sulfonic Acid
(PFOS)
2022
ng/L 6.5 N/A
Range ND * *
N/A
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid exposures resulted
in immune suppression and cancer in laboratory
animals. Average ND * *
Perfluorooct-
anoic Acid
(PFOA)
2022
ng/L 5.1 N/A
Range 5.4-5.7 * *
N/A
Perfluorooctanoic acid exposures resulted in
increased liver weight and cancer in laboratory
animals. Average 5.6 * *
INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Aluminum
2020 µg/L 200 0.6
Range ND ND-0.57 ND
N/A
Erosion of natural deposits; residual
from some surface water treatment
processes Average ND 0.066 ND
Chloride
2020 mg/L 500 N/A
Range 3.9-7.8 1.5-56 9.4-18
N/A Run off/leaching from natural
deposits; seawater influence Average 5.62 22.5 12
Foaming Agents
(MBAS)
2020
µg/L 500 N/A
Range ND ND ND
Municipal and industrial waste
discharges Average ND ND ND
Manganese
2020 mg/L 50 N/A Range ND ND-1.8 0.0020-0.0081
N/A Leaching from natural deposits
Average ND 0.03594 0.0057
Odor Threshold
2020 TON 3 N/A Range ND 1-2 1 N/A Naturally-occurring organic materials Average ND 1 1 Specific
Conductance
2020
µS/cm 1,600 N/A Range 310-480 330-520 480-540 N/A Substances that form ions when in water; seawater influence Average 365 434 520
Sulfate
2020 mg/L 500 N/A Range 14-52 22-43 36-53 N/A Run off/leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes Average 22 33 48
Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS)
2022
mg/L 1,000 N/A Range 160-320 170-250 270-370 N/A Run off/leaching from natural deposits Average 211 222 319
Turbidity
2021 Units 5 N/A Range ND-1.2 ND-2.0 ND-0.36 N/A Soil runoff Average 0.1 0.2 0.21
UNREGULATED Contaminants with no MCLs HEALTH EFFECTS
Boron
2013 mg/L N/A NL=1 Range * 0-0.082% * N/A
The babies of some pregnant women
who drink water containing boron in
excess of the notification level may have
an increased risk of developmental
effects, based on studies in laboratory
animals Average * 0.028 *
Vanadium
2013 ug/L N/A NL=50
Range * ND-6.0 3.8-4.4
N/A
The babies of some pregnant
women who drink water containing
vanadium in excess of the
notification level may have an
increased risk of developmental
effects, based on studies in
laboratory animals
Average * 4.3 4.1
OTHER P A R A M E T E R S
Alkalinity mg/L N/A N/A Range 130-180 97-200 170-200 N/A Naturally-occurring.
SECONDARY STANDARDS - AESTHETIC STANDARDS
Parameter
Sample Date
Units
MCL
PHG
(MCLG)
Range
Average
Water Source
Major Sources in Drinking Water
City of
Rialto
West Valley Water
District (WVWD)
San Bernardino
Valley Municipal
Water
District (BLF)
City of San
Bernardino
Encanto via BLF
80 2020 Average 150 148 190
Bicarbonate
2020 mg/L N/A N/A Range 130-180 * *
N/A Biochemical role in PH buffering.
Average 150 * *
Calcium
2020 mg/L N/A N/A Range 40-72 31-78 60-78
N/A Erosion of salt deposits in soil and
rock. Average 52 52 72
Hardness
2020 mg/L N/A N/A Range 120-220 97-170 190-250
N/A Minerals dissolved from soil and
rock. Average 158 134 230
Magnesium
2020 mg/L N/A N/A Range 5.2-11 4.1-13 11-14
N/A Erosion of soil and rock.
Average 6.9 7.8 13
pH
2020 pH Units N/A N/A Range 7.8-8.2 7.3-8.1 7.5-7.8
N/A Characteristics of water.
Average 8.0 7.8 7.6
Potassium
2017 mg/L N/A N/A Range 1.7-3.2 1.9-3.5 *
N/A Erosion of salt deposits in soil and
rock. Average 2.1 2.4 *
Sodium
2020 mg/L N/A N/A Range 11-26 7.9-52 15-30
N/A Erosion of salt deposits in soil and
rock. Average 14 30 20
UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING1
FOURTH UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING RULE (UCMR4)
Haloacetic Acids
2020 ug/L 60 N/A
Range ND-
1.7 ND-33 *
N/A Byproduct of drinking water
disinfection. Average 0.77 9 *
HAA6Br2
2020 ug/L N/A N/A
Range ND-
2.2 ND-30 *
N/A
Unregulated contaminant
monitoring helps U.S. EPA and
the State Water Resources
Control Board to determine
where certain contaminants occur
and whether the contaminants
need to be regulated.
Average 2.46 12 *
HAA93
2020 ug/L N/A N/A
Range ND-
2.2 ND-53 *
N/A
Unregulated contaminant
monitoring helps U.S. EPA and
the State Water Resources
Control Board to determine
where certain contaminants occur
and whether the contaminants
need to be regulated.
Average 0.77 18 *
Manganese
2020 ug/L 50 N/A
Range ND-70 ND-1.8 1.6-6.9
N/A Leaching from natural deposits.
Average 9.5 1.0 4.3
DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS, DISINFECTANT RESIDUALS, AND DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS PRECURSORS
Parameter
Units
MCL
PHG
(MCLG)
Range
Average
Water Source
Major Sources in Drinking Water
City of
Rialto
West
Valley Water
District
(WVWD)
San Bernardino
Valley Municipal
Water District
(BLF)
City of San
Bernardino
Encanto via BLF
Total Trihalomethanes
(TTHMs)
2022
µg/L LRAA=80 N/A
Range ND-4 ND-7.2 ND-1.6
* Byproduct of drinking water
disinfection
Average .94 4.0 1.0
Haloacetic Acids
2022 µg/L LRAA=60 N/A
Range ND ND ND
* Byproduct of drinking water
disinfection
Average ND ND ND
Chlorine
2022 mg/L MRDL=4.0
(asCl2)
MRDL=4.0
(asCl2)
Range 0.7-2.10 0.71-1.53 0.71-1.53
* Byproduct of drinking water
disinfection Average 1.03 1.10 1.10
81 CITY OF RIALTO LEAD AND COPPER
Lead
2021 µg/L 15 0.2 # of Lead
Sampling 30
ND *
* Internal corrosion of household plumbing
system ND *
Lead - School Testing
2019 µg/L 15 0.2
# of Schools
Lead
Sampling
8 ND-12 * * Internal corrosion of household plumbing
system
Copper
2021 mg/L 1.3 0.3 # of Copper
Sampling 30 90th % * * Internal corrosion of household plumbing system 0.13 *
WVWD LEAD AND COPPER
Lead
2021
µg/L 15 0.2 # of Lead
Sampling 30 ND * * Internal corrosion of household plumbing system ND *
Lead - School Testing
2019 µg/L 15 0.2
# of Schools
Lead
Sampling
1 ND * * Internal corrosion of household plumbing
system
Copper
2021 mg/L 1.3 0.3 # of Copper
Sampling 30 90th % * * Internal corrosion of household plumbing system 0.17 *
* Constituent not sampled for in 2021
Terms Used in This Report
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL):
MCL is the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG):
The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
Public Health Goal (PHG):
The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL):
The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment that may not be exceeded at the consumer’s tap.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG):
The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Primary Drinking Water Standards (PDWS):
MCLs and MRDLs for contaminants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements, and water treatment requirements.
Secondary Drinking Water Standards (SDWS):
MCLs for contaminants that affect taste, odor, or appearance of the drinking water. Contaminants with SDWSs do not affect the health at the MCL levels.
Treatment Technique (TT):
A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
Regulatory Action Level (AL):
The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded,
triggers treatment or other requirements that a water
system must follow.
Variances and Exemptions:
Department permission to exceed an MCL or not
comply with a TT under certain conditions.
NR: no range
ND: not detectable at testing limit
(mg/L) ppm: parts per million or milligrams per liter
(µg/L) ppb: parts per billion or micrograms per liter
(ng/L) ppt: parts per trillion or nanograms per liter
(pCi/L): parts per quadrillion or pictograms per liter
µs/cm: microSiemen per centimeter; or micromho per centimeter (µmho/cm)
1 Unregulated contaminant monitoring helps U.S. EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board to determine where
certain contaminants occur and whether the contaminants need to be regulated.
2 HAA6Br: Sum of Bromochloroacetic acid,
bromodichloroacetic, dibromoacetic, dibromochloroacetic, monobromoacetic acid, and tribromoacetic.
3 HAA9: Sum of Bromochloroacetic acid, bromodichloroacetic acid, chlorodibromoacetic acid, dibromoacetic acid,
dichloroacetic acid, monobromoacetic acid, monochloroacetic acid, tribromoacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid
Units Units Equivalence
mg/L=milligrams
per liter ppm per million 1 second in 11.5
days
µg/L = micrograms
per liter
ppb = parts per
billion
1 second in nearly
32 years
ng/L = nanograms
per liter
ppt = parts per
trillion
1 second in nearly
32,000 years
pg/L = pictograms
per liter
ppq = parts per
quadrillion
1 second in nearly
32,000,000 years
82 Water and Employee Quality
Rialto Water Services is proud to inform residents that the Water Division has passed another annual water quality checkup. City of Rialto Water has met all the Clean Water Standards set forth by the State and Federal Governments in 2004. Part of meeting these requirements is having California Water Resources Control Board and American Water Works Association (AWWA) certified employees in water distribution, treatment and cross connection/ backflow protection. Certifications are obtained by taking college level courses in water science and engineering. We have entered into a collective bargaining agreement that has placed even higher standards on operators and certification levels. In addition, staff continues to upgrade certifications as a part of our continuing education program. State and federal certifications allow us to operate and maintain the public water system for the City of Rialto. This is just one of the many committed efforts we put towards producing clean drinking water for our customers.
Help Us Conserve This Precious Resource
• 2022 was another dry year, now more than ever there is still a need to conserve this precious resource. Surface water levels are not back to normal and groundwater basins, where much of Rialto’s water comes from, are still depleted from the continuing drought. We all play an important role in meeting conservation targets set by the state, whether at home or work. Please review these simple water
conservation tips and help us conserve this, our most
precious natural resource.
• Fill washing machines and dishwashers before running
them. Partial loads use the same amount of water as full loads. You can save up to 1,000 gallons a month.
• Little leaks add up in a hurry. A dripping faucet or a toilet leak can add up to hundreds of gallons of wasted water.
• Turn off the water while you brush your teeth. You can save up to 500 gallons a month.
• Be sure to use low-flow showerheads and install aerators on your kitchen and bathroom faucets. They restrict the flow without compromising water pressure. You can save up to 750 gallons a month.
• Do not use a hose outside to clean sidewalks and
driveways; instead use a broom.
• Follow the Stage 2 Water Alert restrictions issued by the City.
• Be waterwise and think before you turn on the tap.
The City of Rialto offers rebate programs to help you purchase high-efficiency toilets and washing machines, smart irrigation timers, high-efficiency and automatic shut off nozzles, and turf replacement. Please visit the utility’s website at www.rialtowater.com and look for the rebate application or email [email protected] for more information.
For more conservation tips and other drought-related
information, please visit www.rialtowaterservices.com.
83 84
City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-607, Version: 1, Agenda #:
For Water Subcommittee Meeting [June 28, 2023]
TO: Honorable Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Thomas J. Crowley, P.E., Utilities Manager
Toyasha Sebbag, Assistant to the City Manager
Present Findings of Phase 1: Water/Wastewater Revenue Analysis of the Water and Wastewater Rate Study and provide staff direction.
(ACTION)
BACKGROUND:
In 2012, the City Council/Rialto Utility Authority adopted resolutions approving a Concession Agreement with Rialto Water Services (RWS). The Concession Agreement outsourced the operations and maintenance of the City’sWater and Wastewater enterprise to a private contractor for a term of thirty years.
Per the Concession Agreement, the City maintains ownership of all assets and the authority and responsibility for setting utility rates subject to contractual obligations and financial performance standards.
In 2012, the City adopted a five-year rate schedule through the Proposition 218 process. The water and wastewater rates were last adjusted on January 1, 2018. The multi-year rate adjustments approved in 2012 allowed for the financing and implementation of $41 million in improvements and repairs that improved system reliability and efficiencies for both the water and wastewater systems.
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION
On April 11, 2023, the City Council authorized a Sole Source Professional Services Agreement Contract with F.G. Solutions, LLC to complete Phase 1: Water/Wastewater Revenue Analysis of the Water and Wastewater Rate Study. Prior to June 30, 2023, staff was directed to present the results of the Revenue Analysis before the Water Subcommittee and then to the City Council for direction on whether Phase 2 of the Water and Wastewater Rate Study should be completed. Attachment 1 is the Revenue Analysis.
RECOMMENDATION:
Present Findings of Phase 1: Water/Wastewater Revenue Analysis of the Water and Wastewater Rate Study and provide staff direction.
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
85 City of Rialto
Water and Wastewater 2023 Revenue Analysis
Prepared in Advance of Water Subcommittee Meeting,
June 2023
86 2
Agenda
• Review wastewater financial status, then water
• Review current utility budget and compare with revenues • Show reserves
• Show projected financial condition with no rate increases • Performance measures:
• Amount of Revenue Stabilization funds needed
• Trustee debt service coverage
• Ability to pay O&M expenses
• Ability to pay capital expenses
• Show funds available for capital projects with no rate increases • How much capital does $1/month from utility bills pay for? • Discussion
87 3
FY 23/24 RUA
Budget: Wastewater
FY 23/24
Budget
RWS Service Charges
Fixed and Routine R&R Component $2,956,205
Chemical Component $729,932
Labor Component $3,847,946
Other RWS Expenses
Wastewater ORR $930,000
CA: Independent Engineer $109,349
RWS Insurance $999,756
Capital Charges $12,682,000
Allowance for Maintenance < $250 $0
MIPP Services (Veolia) $111,920
Other Wastewater Expenses
Electricity $1,167,308
Gas $188,520
Biosolids $887,285
City Reimbursement (680 Admin) $1,072,830
All Other Expenses $1,037,966
Other City Expenses
City Contract (Transfer to General Fund) $685,000
RUA Lease Payment $1,600,000
Total $29,006,018
Required Deposit to RWS Reserve Fund $238,082
88 4
FY 23/24 RUA
Budget: Wastewater
Comparison of
Revenues and
Expenses
Expenses FY 23/24 Budget
RWS Service Charges $7,534,084
Other RWS Expenses $14,833,025
Electricity, Gas, Biosolids $2,243,113
City Reimbursement (680 Admin) $1,072,830
City Contract (Transfer to General Fund) $685,000
RUA Lease Payment $1,600,000
All Other Expenses $1,037,966
Total Expenses $29,006,018
Deposits to Trust Wastewater Reserve Fund $238,082
Revenues
Wastewater Rates $27,920,183
Development Impact Fees $350,000
Anaergia Lease $300,000
Grants $370,000
RUA Interest Income (Not in Waterfall) $3,930
All Other Revenues $302,000
Total Revenues $29,246,113 89
5 Wastewater reserves
• RUA cash in bank: $21.5M
• DIF funds held in trust: $7.5M
• Estimated next five years of DIF revenues: $1.75M
• Additional restricted reserves held in trust
• No formal policy exists regarding minimum RUA cash
in bank balance
90 6
Wastewater financial projection:
no rate increases, no capital spending
• With no capital spending, slight spenddown of RUA Fund Balance over next five years.
• Ongoing need for revenue stabilization from RUA Fund
Balance to meet coverage requirement in trust
FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28
Calculation of Free Cash Flow
All Revenues Except Development Impact Fees $28,892,183 $28,627,072 $28,732,149 $28,837,418 $28,942,885 Plus Revenue Stabilization From RUA Reserves $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000 $1,500,000 Plus New Revenue Stabilization 0 0 0 0 0
Less Expenses (Excluding RUA Lease Payment) ($27,406,018) ($27,343,618) ($27,710,159) ($28,085,863) ($28,470,959) Free Cash Flow $2,486,165 $2,283,454 $2,021,990 $2,051,556 $1,971,925 Free Cash Flow, as % of RUA Capital Charge 19.6% 18.0% 15.9% 16.2% 15.5% Projected RUA Fund Balance, $M, End of Year $21.5 $21.2 $21.3 $20.5 $19.691 7 Wastewater: $1/month from monthly bill:
how much capital does it pay for?
• $1/month from each EDU:
• $450,000 per year cash
• Annual cash spending of $450,000, or
• Debt service on $6.4M SRF loan (20 years, 2%, also considers trust coverage requirement), or
• Debt service on $7.1M WIFIA loan (30 years, 3.61%, also considers trust coverage requirement)
92 8
FY 23/24 RUA
Budget: Water
FY 23/24
Budget
RWS Service Charges
Fixed and Routine R&R Component $3,057,485
Chemical Component $63,096
Labor Component $3,533,470
Other RWS Expenses
Water ORR (1) $680,000
CA: Independent Engineer $109,296
RWS Insurance $869,512
Capital Charges $2,900,000
Allowance for Maintenance < $250 $221,300
Other Water Production and Purchase
Electricity (2) $1,540,932
Water Purchase, Baseline Feeder $500,749
Water Purchases, Other $671,129
Perchlorate, Not Reimbursed $87,300
Other Utility Operating Costs
City Reimbursement (680 Admin) $799,560
All Other Expenses $974,172
Other City Expenses
City Contract (Transfer to General Fund) $479,023
RUA Lease Payment $400,000
Total $16,887,024
Required Deposit to RWS Reserve Fund $272,119
93 9
FY 23/24 RUA
Budget: Water
Comparison of
Revenues and
Expenses
Expenses FY23/24 Budget
RWS Service Charges $6,654,051
Other RWS Expenses $4,780,108
Other Water Production and Purchase $2,800,110
City Reimbursement (680 Admin) $799,560
City Contract (Transfer to General Fund) $479,023
RUA Lease Payment $400,000
All Other Expenses $974,172
Total Expenses $16,887,024
Deposits to Trust Water Reserve Fund $272,119
Revenues
Water Rates $13,053,423
Perchlorate Revenues $0
Development Impact Fees $200,000
Water Rights Lease to SB County $332,264
Grants $165,025
RUA Interest Income (Not in Waterfall) $110,640
All Other Revenues $243,050
Total Revenues $14,104,40294
10 Water reserves
• RUA cash in bank: $1.6M
• DIF funds held in trust: $2.6M
• Estimated next five years of DIF revenues: $1.0M
• Rate stabilization reserves held in trust: $2.785M
• These funds will be used in FY 23/24
• Additional restricted reserves held in trust
• No formal policy exists regarding minimum RUA cash in bank balance
95 11
Water financial projection:
no rate increases, no capital spending
• Estimated $21M revenue stabilization needed over next five years. • FY 23/24 Revenue Stabilization reserves held in trust and spend down of RUA Fund Balance. • At least $13.2M revenue stabilization required but no funding source identified. • Capital spending, if any, limited to use of DIF reserves FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28
Calculation of Free Cash Flow
All Revenues Except Development Impact Fees $13,941,354 $13,837,058 $13,898,394 $13,960,751 $14,024,177 Plus Revenue Stabilization From RUA Reserves 300,000 1,400,000 0 0 0 Plus Revenue Stabilization Currently in Trust 2,785,000 Plus New Revenue Stabilization 0 1,800,000 3,500,000 3,800,000 4,100,000 Less Expenses (Excluding RUA Lease Payment) ($16,487,024) ($16,487,148) ($16,825,577) ($17,172,466) ($17,528,028) Free Cash Flow $539,330 $549,910 $572,818 $588,285 $596,149 Free Cash Flow, as % of RUA Capital Charge 18.6% 19.0% 19.8% 20.3% 20.6% Projected RUA Fund Balance, $M, End of Year $1.9 $0.1 $0.3 $0.3 $0.396 12 Water: $1/month from monthly bill:
how much capital does it pay for?
• $1/month from each EDU:
• $226,000 per year cash
• Annual cash spending of $226,000, or
• Debt service on $3.14M SRF loan (20 years, 2%, also considers trust coverage requirement), or
• Debt service on $3.5M WIFIA loan (30 years, 3.61%, also considers trust coverage requirement)
• Ability to issue debt without revenue
stabilization/sufficient rates is in question.
97 13
Capital Improvements:
Priority Infrastructure Upgrades
Wastewater:
• Sycamore Sewer Upsize: $3M
• Acacia Sewer Upsize: $2M
• Digester 1 Activation & Digester 2 Rehab: $1.8M
• Rialto Biosolids: $21.9M Remaining
• Agua Mansa Lift Station Upgrades: $2M
• Secondary Clarifier 1 and 2 Upgrades: $0.5M
• Ayala Lift Station Upgrade and Repair: $2M
Water:
• $6.7M Etiwanda Avenue Water Main Replacement.
98 14
Capital Improvements:
projects with outside funding
Wastewater:
• Microgrid: $20M project cost. Estimated 30% project funding through ITC Tax credit. Triggers ITC Tax Credit on other projects:
• WWTP P1 and P2 Demo. $2.3M project cost
• WWTP Electrical Upgrade for Microgrid: $8.8M project cost • Lake Rialto: $5.25M grant funding; $2.95M remaining unfunded.
Water:
• Priority infrastructure upgrades:
• AMI: $8M project. $8M grant received, fully funded.
• Well 3A Groundwater Treatment: $4.2M project. $2M grant received Security Upgrades, water and wastewater: $4M, fully ARPA funded 99 15 Feedback, Questions, Comments?
Thank you for your time.
100
City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-23-625, Version: 1, Agenda #:
Utilities Manager Update
Discussion items:
a) Conservation Projects/Rebates
b) Orangewood Mobile Home Park Agreement
c) SAOU Site Visit by EPA - completion of project
City of Rialto Printed on 6/23/2023Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
101