Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Water Subcommittee
September 18, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 18, 2025
Body
Water Subcommittee
Pages
3
Original file
3.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on rialto.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Thursday, September 18, 2025
City of Rialto
Council Chambers
150 S. Palm Ave.

Rialto, CA 92376
Rialto City Hall, Council Chambers, 150 S. Palm Ave. Rialto CA 92376 Water Subcommittee
Mayor Joe Baca
Mayor Pro Tem Ed Scott
Special Meeting - Final
SPECIAL MEETING - 10:00 A.M.

Water Subcommittee Meeting
The City Council creates Subcommittees as needed to accomplish the work of the Council .

Subcommittees are categorized as either, Standing or Ad Hoc. Subcommittees do not replace the work or decision -making process of the City Council as a whole and are used to provide feedback to staff. Subcommittees enable City staff to obtain early feedback from representative members of the City Council on issues affecting public policy prior to their presentation, as necessary, to the full City Council.

Any discussion or feedback expressed or received at a Subcommittee meeting should not be construed or understood to be a decision by or for the City Council. Further, any feedback the Subcommittee may make to the City Council is based on information possessed by the Subcommittee at the time the feedback is made and may be revised or amended upon receipt by the Subcommittee of additional or newer information.
1 September 18, 2025Water Subcommittee Special Meeting - Final HOW TO REVIEW THE AGENDA. ALL AGENDAS ARE POSTED IN THE CITY HALL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING (150 SOUTH PALM AVENUE, RIALTO) AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ALL WRITINGS THAT

RELATE TO AN OPEN SESSION AGENDA ITEM AT A REGULAR SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING DISTRIBUTED TO ALL OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT THE SAME TIME BUT AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE A REGULAR MEETING, FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION ON THE CITY ’S WEBSITE AT www .rialtoca.gov AND IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK LOCATED AT 290 WEST RIALTO AVENUE, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA (909-820-2519) FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY. ANY PERSON HAVING A QUESTION CONCERNING ANY AGENDA ITEM MAY CALL ADMINISTRATION /UTILITIES DIVISION AT (909-820-2689) TO MAKE INQUIRY CONCERNING THE NATURE OF THE ITEM DESCRIBED ON THE AGENDA.

ITEMS ADDED TO THE AGENDA. CONSISTENT WITH THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT, ADDITIONAL ITEMS MAY BE

ADDED TO THE AGENDA AND ACTED UPON BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ONLY IF IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE A “SUBSEQUENT NEED” OR “EMERGENCY” ITEM AND IS ADDED BY A MAJORITY VOTE. MATTERS RAISED

UNDER ORAL COMMUNICATIONS MAY NOT BE ACTED UPON AT THAT MEETING OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED ABOVE.

NEED ADA ASSISTANCE? IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, IF YOU NEED

SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AT (909) 421-7279. NOTIFICATION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO THIS MEETING (28 CAR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

HOW TO ATTEND THE MEETING.
(1) Members of the public may attend the meeting in person.

HOW TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT.
(1) Appear at the meeting and speak during the public comment period. There is a 5-minute time limit. (2) You may submit a public comment in writing to the Rialto Utility Authority by email at [email protected].

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

PUBLIC COMMENTS

APPROVAL OF MINUTES
WS-25-0597 Minutes from the July 24, 2025 Meeting
Minutes from the 07 24 2025 Water Subcommittee meetingAttachments:

PRESENTATIONS

REPORTS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
WS-25-0595 Staff Requests that the Water Subcommittee Provide Feedback on the Update to the Proposed Water and Wastewater/Sewer Rate Study. (ACTION)
PowerPoint Presentation by Water Resource Economics
CIP PowerPoint Presentation for informational purposes
Attachments:

Page 2 ends

2 September 18, 2025Water Subcommittee Special Meeting - Final WS-25-0594 Update on the Biosolids Project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant Provided by RWS/Veolia’s Management Team.

UTILITY DIRECTOR
WS-25-0598 Utilities Director Update:

1. Update on the Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Project

2. Veolia’s Monthly Operations Reports (MOR): August 2025 (reporting period June 2025)
Monthly Operations Report_Reporting Period_June 2025_AUGUST REPORTAttachments:

UPCOMING MEETING: Thursday, September 25, 2025

ADJOURNMENT

Page 3 ends

3 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-25-0597, Version: 1, Agenda #:

For Water Subcommittee Meeting September 18, 2025
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Tanya Williams, City Manager
FROM: Nicole Hemmans, Senior Administrative Analyst
Minutes from the July 24, 2025 Meeting
City of Rialto Printed on 9/15/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
4 1

CITY OF RIALTO

REGULAR MEETING OF THE WATER SUBCOMMITTEE
July 24, 2025 - 10:00 A.M.

MINUTES
The Regular meeting of the Water Subcommittee of the City of Rialto was held in the Civic Center Council Chambers located at 150 S.

Palm Avenue, Rialto, California 92376, on Monday, July 24, 2025. o0o
CALL TO ORDER Call to order at 10:00 A.M.
o0o
ROLL CALL Senior Administrative Analyst Nicole Hemmans took the roll call.

Subcommittee Members / City Staff:

Mayor Joe Baca
Mayor Pro Tem Ed Scott
Tanya Williams, City Manager
Robert Khuu, Assistant City Attorney
Nicole Hemmans, Senior Administrative Analyst
Additional Attendees:

Stephen Dopudja, Dopudja & Wells Consulting, Inc.

Peter Luchetti, RWS/Table Rock
Megan Matson, RWS/Table Rock
Evan Kominski, Ullico
Nick Desimpelare, Ullico
o0o

CLOSED SESSION
WS-25-0494 – Conference with Legal
Counsel – Anticipated Litigation.

Closed session started at 10:01 AM. The following attendees exited the meeting prior to the closed session discussion: Peter Luchetti, Megan Matson, Evan Kominski, and Nick Desimpelare.

Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2) Significant Exposure to Litigation Number of Matters: one (1).

OPEN SESSION
Closed session concluded at 10:34 AM.

Open session resumed at 10:35 AM. The following attendees returned to the regular meeting: Peter Luchetti, Megan Matson, Evan Kominski, and Nick Desimpelare.

PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comment received on July 24, 2025:
5 2

 None.

o0o

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Mayor Baca asked if there were any comments pertaining to the minutes.

 Nicole Hemmans corrected the date on the Utilities Director’s staff report to July 24, 2024.

o0o

NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
WS-25-0479 – Update on t he Rialto
Biosolids Handling Upgrade s Project
at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
(ACTION)

Update on the Rialto Biosolids Handling Upgrade s Project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant provided by RWS/Veolia. (ACTION)

Questions & Comments
 Peter Luchetti and Megan Matson with RWS/Table Rock distributed an updated PowerPoint presentation on the Biosolids project.

 Mayor Baca inquired about the funding sources for the costs associated with the new technology.

o Stephen Dopudja advised that it is included in the project cost.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott stated he will support the biosolids project moving forward, based on the updated FCWA totaling $35,598,387, but will not support Veolia earning more than 10%.

 Mayor Baca inquired about the projected timeline for the project's completion.

o Megan stated the project should be completed by the end of 2027.

 Mayor Baca asked if there will be a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) in place?

o Megan Matson confirms that there will be a PLA in place, the same as the S1 project.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott mentioned that he met with Mr. Luchetti and Sonia regarding PLAs, and it was very clear that PLAs should be in place, even for small projects. He further expressed frustration upon 6 3

learning about a $5 million project without a PLA, despite claims that union wages were paid.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott advised that it was established that anything over $170,000 would require a PLA.

 Mr. Luchetti stated he will introduce the City Manager , Tanya Williams, to the City’s new representative with the San Bernardino Building Trades Council.

 Ms. Matson suggested that there would be savings if the City were to apply the unused allocation of a prior FCWA to this project.

 City Manager Williams suggested that it is more straightforward to issue a new FCWA, instead of combining the projects, as the available funds for the prior FCWA are unknown.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott clarified that, citywide, unused funds of a FCWA do not automatically revert to the fund balance.

 Mr. Dopudja provided two options on recognizing the unused portion of a prior FCWA:

o Option one – Issue a credit for the unused portion of the previous FCWA against the new FCWA, offering a savings.

However, consider the accounting challenges.

o Option two – Issue a FCWA for the total project cost and cancel the previous authorizations.

 Mayor Baca inquired if the unused portion of a FCWA can be allocated to a fund designated for other city projects.

 Mayor Pro Tem advised that it should roll back into the budget.

 Mayor Baca asked if the cost of the entire project is an estimate?

o City Manager Williams advised that the Guaranteed
Maximum Price (GMP) is the contractual amount and that
there will not be any increases to the cost.

 Mayor Baca asked if the project cost would increase with the cost of construction.

o Mr. Dopudja advised that the GMP will not increase.

 Ms. Matson requested that an unused portion of a previous FCWA for Digester 1 & 2, totaling $300,000, be reallocated to the Biosolids project before canceling the Digester 1 & 2 FCWA authorization. 7 4

 Mr. Luchetti suggested a Project Cost Accounting reconciliation to the FCWA’s under the Rialto Utility Authority.

o City Manager Williams commented that it is part of a previous discussion that we need to get a better
understanding of the financial management.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott noted that there has been ongoing discussion regarding the need to place greater emphasis on the financial aspects. He acknowledged that the department has a qualified financial expert, Nicole Hemmans, whose expertise has not yet been fully utilized for this purpose. The conversation on this matter continues.

 Mayor Pro Tem asked if this item will be presented at the next City Council meeting?

 City Manager Williams advises that it can be presented at the next meeting, just as long as the staff report is prepared no later than August 6, 2025.

 Mayor Pro Tem stated he would like to see it happen on August 12, 2025 City Council meeting.

 Mayor Baca and Mayor Pro Tem Scott requested that staff report include that this item was reviewed b y the Water subcommittee and they recommended that it be brought to the council.

The Water Subcommittee’s feedback on their review of the project was to move forward with presenting this item to the City Council for recommendation at the FCWA amount of $35,598,387, and to disclose that there may be a cost saving from reallocating unused funding from a prior FCWA.

o0o

WS-25-0499 – Request for Feedback
Regarding the Proposed Water and
Wastewater/Sewer Rate Study Schedule.
(ACTION)

Staff requested Feedback Regarding the Proposed Water and Wastewater/Sewer Rate Study Schedule.
(ACTION)

Questions & Comments
 Mayor Baca asked what the rate increase would be?

o Mr. Dopudja said that we do not know and that would be determined in the rate study process.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott said he approves of the rate study but wants it to include eliminating the annual lease payment to the City and keeping those funds in the water and wastewater fund.
8 5

 City Manager Williams asked Assistant City Legal, Robert Khuu, whether Prop 218 hearings can be held during a Special Meeting, as the staff report shows the planned hearing date is to be scheduled for November 18, 2025. This is considered a Special Meeting because the regular meeting scheduled for November 11th was canceled due to Veterans Day, and the second regular meeting in November was canceled because it falls on the week of Thanksgiving.

o Mr. Kuu advised that he will confirm.

o0o

WS-25-0502 – Request for Feedback
Regarding Amendment with Soto
Resources for the Preparation of the
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program (HMGP).
(ACTION)

Staff requested that the Water Subcommittee provide feedback on a contract amendment with Soto Resources in the amount of $62,100 for the preparation of the Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP).
(ACTION)

Questions & Comments
 Mayor Baca asked which agency the City intends to apply for generator grant funds.

o City Manager Williams advised that this grant is through the Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP).

 City Manager Williams advised that the total cost of this project increases the project agreement above $100,000, which is why this item will need recommendation from the Water Subcommittee to be taken to the council for approval.

 Mayor Pro Tem commented that we have been discussing this matter for years and asked how West Valley Water District (WVWD) obtained their generators already.

o Staff will confirm how WVWD generators were funded
and provide an update to the Water Subcommittee.

 Mayor Baca expressed the need for staff to have a more aggressive approach in actively seeking out, identifying, and applying for grant opportunities.

The Water Subcommittee’s feedback was to move this item forward for recommendation to the City Council.

o0o

9 6

WS-25-0483 – Utilities Director
Update.

Utilities Director Update:

1. Future Extraterritorial Agreements:
a. 19010 Valley Blvd., Bloomington, CA - Single Family
Residence
b. 9330 S. Linden Ave., Bloomington, CA - Single Family Residence
c. 10701 Cedar Ave., Bloomington, CA - Mobile Home Park

2. Update on Electric Rate Savings Analysis.

3. Update on Total Maximum Daily Limit (TMDL) Water Sampling at the Rialto Wastewater Treatment Plant.

4. Veolia’s Monthly Operations Reports (MOR): July 2025 (reporting period May 2025)

Questions & Comments
Future Extraterritorial Agreements

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott requested a more accurate report on contaminants in the City of Rialto’s water supply, by well site location. He expressed that he was not satisfied with the presentation on the Public Health Goals report. Additionally, MPT mentioned he disagrees with RWS, stating that we are blending water to get rid of arsenic. We should be looking for a treatment system as opposed to stating we’re blending water . Mayor Pro Tem requested an update and would like a discussion item on this matter.

 Mr. Luchetti brought to the attention of the Water Subcommittee that a reconciliation is needed on the Extraterritorial Agreements for two specific reasons:

1. ETA Revenue collection.

2. Liability purposes. If RWS/Veolia is responsible for a location, they need to be made aware.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott requested an update on the status of the ETA reconciliation.

 Mayor Pro Tem Scott requested an update on the project located at 2245 Valley Blvd.

o0o

10 7

UPCOMING MEETINGS/OTHER

DISCUSSION ITEMS
 The next Water Subcommittee meeting is scheduled for
Thursday, August 28, 2025.

o0o

ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:24 AM.

11 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-25-0595, Version: 1, Agenda #:

For Water Subcommittee Meeting September 18, 2025
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Tanya Williams, City Manager
FROM: Nicole Hemmans, Senior Administrative Analyst
Staff Requests that the Water Subcommittee Provide Feedback on the Update to the Proposed Water and Wastewater/Sewer Rate Study.
(ACTION)

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Water Subcommittee provide feedback on the update to the proposed Water and Wastewater/Sewer Rate Study.

BACKGROUND
On July 23, 2024, the City Council/Rialto Utility Authority (RUA) Board adopted a one-year rate adjustment, effective January 1, 2025, for water and wastewater/sewer services. The one-year rate was based on a five-year financial projection. Staff were directed to return in 2025 with an updated rate analysis for Council/RUA Board reevaluation.

In accordance with the City Council’sdirection to return in 2025 for a reevaluation, staff is preparing to present an updated analysis to the City Council/Rialto Utility Authority (RUA) Board to reassess the water and wastewater rates. On July 24, 2025, staff shared a proposed schedule for the rate study with the Water Subcommittee and requested feedback to support the development of the updated rate analysis.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION
Staff and RWS are working with financial consultant Sanjay Guar and his team at Water Economics to prepare a financial analysis and rate study to determine the potential rate increases necessary for the Rialto Utility Authority to operate and project funding, and to be in compliance with the 2012 Concession Agreement. The five-year analysis considers projected expenditures, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, cash reserves, potential long-term debt financing, and debt coverage requirements.

City staff, consultants, and RWS principals plan to update the Water Subcommittee on the status of the rate study, the projected timeline for a 218 hearing for the Council to consider rate increases, and to seek input and feedback on the various key factors in the analysis, such as:
· Water CIP projects in the next five years
· Wastewater CIP projects in the next five years
City of Rialto Printed on 9/15/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
12 File #: WS-25-0595, Version: 1, Agenda #:
· Any potential financing needs for selected capital projects · Trustee coverage requirements
· Debt coverage requirements
· RUA reserve balances and usage
· The desirability of a multi-year rate increase for strengthening rating agency and future long- term debt positions, and lower issuance costs
· Final determination of CIP projects to be included in financial analysis Water Economics will present its preliminary analysis and identify any outstanding assumptions, data needs, or directions required to complete the study, per the attached PowerPoint presentation.

Included in the packet is RWS’s2025 CIP project’spresentation that provides background for the various projects analyzed as part of the rate study financial analysis. Though staff do not intend to go through the presentation at the meeting, it does provide detailed information on each project.

Further, staff will discuss the remaining elements of the process and schedule with the Subcommittee through to the 218 hearing.

Once the Subcommittee provides feedback and direction, the team will finalize the rate analysis and related rate adjustments for review at the next Water Subcommittee meeting. A draft Proposition 218 notice will also be presented at that time for Subcommittee review. This draft will be subject to further refinement prior to distribution to RUA customers. The notice will include the proposed hearing date and time, along with information on protest procedures, as required under Proposition 218.

ATTACHMENT(S)
PowerPoint Presentation by Water Resource Economics
CIP PowerPoint Presentation for informational purposes
City of Rialto Printed on 9/15/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
13 City of RialtoWater SubcommitteePreliminary Water and Wastewater ScenariosSeptember 18, 20251 14 Agenda•Water Financial Plan Scenarios•Wastewater Financial Plan Scenarios2 15 Financial Plan Assumptions•No lease payments from RUA to the City for use of city assets are included•Revenues•No customer growth or change in demand is projected•Operating expenses •Operating expenses are projected to increase by on average 3.2% annually3 16 Key Financial Performance MarkersFund Balance, Trustee Coverage, and Debt CoverageRUA and Trustee Fund Balance 4The minimum fund balance for trustee reserves is 25% of operating expenses, capital charges, and debt service (see Trustee Reserve Target)Remaining funds after meeting the trustee reserve target (25%) are transferred to RUA reserves where CIP is funded. This fund balance must stay above $0 (see Alert Balance) Trustee CoverageDebt CoverageAs part of the City’s Concession Agreement, rates must be high enough to ensure that net revenues less capital charges and debt service are at least equal to 17.7% (for water) or 15% (for wastewater) of annual capital charges and debt serviceThe City has no existing debt. Any proposed debt issuance will have a debt coverage requirement typically equal to 125%. This means that net revenues divided by annual debt service payments must be at least greater than 125% 17 Water Fund Balances•Trustee Fund•Beginning balance = $4.5M•RUA Fund•Beginning balance = $1.0M (Combined Remedy Reimbursement)•Construction Fund•Beginning balance = $3.2M•Rate Stabilization for CIP and O&M•Available money on hand = $6.6M 5 18 Water CIP
6* Water CIP is annually inflated by 4%, except for grant funded projects which are non-inflatedCapital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Inflated) Planned Status Funding Eligibility FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Water Main: Etiwanda (Riverside to Eucalyptus) Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $5,408,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,408,000Pressure Relief Valves (PRVs) Zone 2 to Zone 3 Priority 100% DIF $0 $648,960 $0 $0 $0 $648,960Well “City 3A” Groundwater Treatment System Priority Rates / Grants / 25% DIF $3,744,000 $3,893,760 $0 $0 $0 $7,637,7604” S. Oakdale & S. Marcella (E Rialto and Allen) Second Priority Rates $0 $0 $0 $4,211,491 $0 $4,211,491Security for Water and Wastewater Grant Funded Grants $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000Automatic Meter Infrastructure (AMI) Grant Funded Grants $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000Service line: South Alice, South Palm, West Vodden, Alru St. Third Priority Rates $0 $778,752 $809,902 $0 $0 $1,588,654Service line: Bonnie View (Acacia and Eucalyptus) Third Priority Rates $0 $0 $3,239,608 $0 $0 $3,239,608Cedar Reservoir 2, Overhaul, and Dome PreservationDefer with Caution Rates$0 $0 $0 $3,509,576 $0 $3,509,576Service Line, Hydrant Laterals, Etiwanda Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $4,724,429 $0 $0 $4,724,429Serviceline&Hydrant: Woodcrest, Yucca, etc Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $0 $2,807,661 $0 $2,807,661Service Line: Cedar & Larch Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,211,964 $3,211,964Service Line & Hydrant: Palm, Orange, Olive, Date Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,817,945 $4,817,945Total - Capital Projects $7,744,000 $16,729,472 $8,773,939 $10,528,727 $8,029,909 $51,806,047 19 Water CIP
7 Total Value of Projects: •Priority:$13,694,720•Second Priority: $4,211,491•Grant Funded: $10,000,000•Third Priority: $4,828,262•Defer with Caution: $19,071,574 20 Water CIP ScenarioPriority, Second Priority, and Grant Funded CIP , Funded by Rates/ Grants/ DIF/ Rate Stabilization 8CIP Funding Sources:•Trustee Rate Stabilization = $3.5 Million•DIF = $4 Million•Grants= $14.5 Million•Rates = $6 Million 21 Water No Revenue Adjustment ScenarioPriority, Second Priority, and Grant Funded CIP + O&M, Funded by Rates/ Grants/ DIF/ Rate Stabilization 9 In this scenario the City does not meet its trustee coverage requirements starting in FY 2027 No Revenue Adjustment Scenario FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Rate Adjustment 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 22 Water Proposed ScenarioPriority, Second Priority, and Grant Funded CIP + O&M, Funded by Rates/ Grants/ DIF/ Rate Stabilization 10 In this scenario the City will meet its trustee coverage requirements in each year Proposed Scenario FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Rate Adjustment (Proposed Scenario) 19% 9% 3% 3% 3%37%Rate Adjustment (Including Third Priority CIP) 23% 18% 17% 3% 3%64% 23 Water Customer ImpactsProposed Scenario based on 19%/23% Revenue Adjustment in FY 2026 11Proposed Scenario FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Rate Adjustment (Proposed Scenario) 19% 9% 3% 3% 3%37%Rate Adjustment (Including Third Priority CIP) 23% 18% 17% 3% 3%64%*Based on average monthly residential customer usage of 15 ccf 24 Wastewater Fund Balances•Trustee Fund•Beginning balance = $7.6M•RUA Fund•Beginning balance = $10.0M•Construction Fund•Beginning balance = $11.7M•Rate Stabilization for CIP and O&M•Available money on hand = $23.3M 12 25 Wastewater CIP
13*Wastewater CIP is annually inflated by 4%, except for grant funded projects and the Solids Handing project which are non-inflated Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Inflated) Planned Status Funding Eligibility FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Solids Handling Priority Rates / 20% DIF $12,000,000 $24,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $36,720,000Upsizing Sewer: Sycamore Priority Rates / 20% DIF $5,740,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,740,800Agua Mansa Sewer Lift Station Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $0 $3,374,592 $701,915 $0 $4,076,507Ayala Lift Station Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $0 $0 $3,509,576 $0 $3,509,576Upsizing Sewer: Willow Ave (Grove to Foothill) Priority Rates / 50% DIF $0 $0 $674,918 $0 $0 $674,918Secondary EQ Influent Filter Pump Priority Rates $0 $0 $0 $3,509,576 $0 $3,509,576Upsizing Sewer (Acacia:Bonnie View to South) Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $648,960 $0 $0 $0 $648,960Upsizing Sewer: Merrill Ave (Acacia to Sycamore) Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $2,595,840 $0 $0 $0 $2,595,840Plant 5 Clarifiers Priority Rates $0 $648,960 $0 $0 $0 $648,960Plant 5 Aeration BasinsPriorityRates$0 $0 $1,349,837 $0 $0 $1,349,837 Upsizing Sewer: Sycamore Ave (Huff to Randall) Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $0 $2,024,755 $0 $0 $2,024,755Overhaul Headworks, Plant 5 Priority Rates / 20% DIF $0 $0 $0 $1,403,830 $0 $1,403,830Spencer Aeration Blowers Priority Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,094,988 $1,094,988Barscreen #1 Replacement Priority Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,996 $364,996Future Sewer Main Replacement 2028 Priority Rates $0 $0 $0 $1,403,830 $0 $1,403,830Future Sewer Main Replacement 2029Priority Rates$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,459,983 $1,459,9834th Disk Filter Priority 100% DIF $0 $0 $0 $1,052,873 $0 $1,052,873Security Project - Wastewater Grant Funded Grants $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000Manhole 2026 Defer with Caution Rates $0 $259,584 $0 $0 $0 $259,584Demolish Plants 1 and 2 Defer with Caution Rates $0 $3,063,091 $0 $0 $0 $3,063,091Manhole 2027 Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $269,967 $0 $0 $269,967Manhole 2028 Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $0 $280,766 $0 $280,766Flare and Biogas System Modifications Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $0 $4,211,491 $0 $4,211,491Manhole 2029 Defer with Caution Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $291,997 $291,997Electrical Upgrade Defer with Caution Rates / 20% DIF $3,600,480 $7,469,530 $0 $0 $0 $11,070,010Backup Power (CoGen) Defer with Caution Rates / 20% DIF $0 $9,013,333 $18,459,769 $0 $0 $27,473,101SCADA Upgrades to Lift Stations Defer with Caution Rates / 20% DIF $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,094,988 $1,094,988Total - Capital Projects $23,341,280 $48,419,298 $26,153,838 $16,073,857 $4,306,951 $118,295,224 26 Wastewater CIP
14 Total Value of Projects: •Priority: $68,280,229•Grant Funded : $2,000,000•Defer with Caution : $48,014,995 27 Wastewater CIP ScenarioPriority and Grant Funded CIP , Funded by Rates/ DIF/ Rate Stabilization/ Debt 15CIP Funding Sources:•Trustee Rate Stabilization = $21.3 Million•DIF = $15.7 Million•Grants= $2 Million•Debt = $5 Million•Rates = $26.2 Million•With no debt CIP funded by rates would be $31.2 Million ($5 Million Increase) 28 Wastewater No Revenue Adjustment and No Debt ScenarioPriority and Grant Funded CIP + O&M, Funded by Rates/ Grants/ DIF/ Rate Stabilization 16 In this scenario the City does not meet its trustee coverage requirements starting in FY 2027 No Revenue Adjustment Scenario FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Rate Adjustment 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0% 29 Wastewater Proposed ScenarioPriority and Grant Funded CIP + O&M, Funded by Rates/ Grants/ DIF/ Revenue Stabilization/ Debt 17 In this scenario the City will meet its trustee coverage requirements in each yearFor the City’s new debt issuance ($5 Million in FY 2027), the City will meet its debt coverage requirements in each year Proposed Scenario FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Rate Adjustment 5% 5% 5% 4% 4%23% 30 Wastewater Customer ImpactsProposed Scenario based on 5% Revenue Adjustment in FY 2026 18Proposed Scenario FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Total Rate Adjustment 5% 5% 5% 4% 4%23% 31 Contact Information
Sanjay GaurFounder / [email protected] PhanPrincipal [email protected] HunzickerProject [email protected] 32 Rialto Water Services
Core Capital Improvement Projects Status
WATER SUBCOMMITTEE • AUGUST 28 TH , 2025
33 Key Supports, CIP Investment
Grant Funding of $14M obtained, can help
offset CIP impact on ratepayers and fund
key projects like AMI
Reserves Funding of >$30M can help
offset CIP impact on ratepayers and fund
critically needed core upgrades like the
Biosolids Project
Development Impact Funds of [$10.3M]
can help offset growth-related CIP impact
on ratepayers, and fund expansion
projects like the Sewer Main upsizing
Rate-Supported Reserve Builds & Debt
Funding can help smooth CIP impact on
ratepayers
Regulatory Requirements including permit compliance,
safety and SSO mitigation, drive Priority CIP investments Annual Asset Management Planning, condition
assessments, and emergency incidence records, show
where critical needs exist or reliability is compromised Rate Impact outcomes can shape timing and prioritization of CIP investment, while Inflationary Forces affecting
operating costs can put pressure on CIP investment
Key Drivers Of CIP Investment:
34 CIP Progress Update 2012 to 2025
Rialto’s Wastewater Utility has significantly progressed on the ”Liquids” side, with the investment in S1, and is about to progress on the “Solids” side, with the approval of the Biosolids Project. The Collection Network condition and Master Plan growth projections defines much of the need in Wastewater. Rialto’s Water Utility needs now center around a Distribution Network with several 40-50-year old Water Mains, plus associated metering, storage, and wells capacity
Rialto 2025 Biosolids Project
Rialto 2012
Rialto 2012
<– S1 Project
Rialto 2025
35 5-Year Wastewater CIP
36 Wastewater Projects
This RWS table shows Priority
Status CIP , including where
Master Plan growth
projections are driving CIP ,
where Criticality is driving CIP ,
and where Grant funding is
driving CIP . Projects in red are
shown but suggested for
deferral with caution.

WASTEWATER PROJECTS
Project Short Name Status Condition
Rank Project Cost FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 Solids Handling Approved/Funded 5 $35,589,387 $12,000,000 $23,589,387 Upsizing Sewer: Sycamore Priority N/A $5,520,000 $5,520,000 RHNC (Natue Center) Priority Grant N/A $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Upsizing Sewer: Willow Ave (Grove to Foothill) Priority/MP N/A $600,000 $600,000 Upsizing Sewer (Acacia:Bonnie View to South) Priority/MP N/A $600,000 $600,000 Upsizing Sewer: Merrill Ave (Acacia to Sycamore) Priority/MP N/A $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Upsizing Sewer: Sycamore Ave (Huff to Randall) Priority/MP N/A $1,800,000 $1,800,000 Agua Mansa Sewer Lift Station Priority N/A $3,600,000 $3,000,000 $600,000 Ayala Lift Station Priority 4 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Secondary EQ Influent Filter Pump Priority 5 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Plant 5 Clarifiers Priority 4.5 $600,000 $600,000
Plant 5 Aeration Basins Priority 4 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Overhaul Headworks, Plant 5 Priority 4 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Spencer Aeration Blowers Priority 4.5 $900,000 $900,000 Barscreen #1 Replacement Priority 3.5 $300,000 $300,000 Future Sewer Main Replacement 2028 Priority 5 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Future Sewer Main Replacement 2029 Priority 5 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 4th Disk Filter Priority N/A $900,000 $900,000
Security System Priority Grant N/A $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Manhole 2026 Deferred/Caution 5 $240,000
Demolish Plants 1 and 2 Deferred/Caution N/A $2,832,000 Manhole 2027 Deferred/Caution 5 $240,000
Manhole 2028 Deferred/Caution 5 $240,000
Flare and Biogas System Modifications Deferred/Caution NA $3,600,000 Manhole 2029 Deferred/Caution 5 $240,000
Electrical Upgrade Deferred/Caution N/A $10,368,000
Backup Power (CoGen) Deferred/Caution N/A $24,744,000
SCADA Upgrades to Lift Stations Deferred/Caution N/A $900,000 Deferred/Caution $43,404,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Grant $10,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Approved/Funded $35,589,387 $12,000,000 $23,589,387 $0 $0 $0 Priority $28,020,000 $9,520,000 $10,600,000 $7,200,000 $6,300,000 $2,400,000 Spend by Fiscal Year
37 5-Year Water CIP
38 Water Projects
This RWS table shows
Priority Status CIP ,
including where Master
Plan growth projections
are driving CIP , where
Criticality is driving CIP ,
and where Grant
funding is driving CIP .

Projects in red are
shown but suggested
for deferral with
caution
.

Water Projects
Project Short Name Status Condition
Rank Project Cost FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 Water Main: Etiwanda (Riverside to Eucalyptus) Priority 5 $8,040,000 $8,040,000 Pressure Relief Valves (PRVs) Zone 2 to Zone 3 Priority/MP N/A $600,000 $600,000 Automatic Meter Infrastructure (AMI) Priority Grant N/A $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Service line: South Alice, South Palm, West Vodden, Alru St. Deferred/Caution 5 $1,440,000 Security for Water and Wastewater Deferred/Caution N/A $2,000,000 Automatic Meter Infrastructure (AMI) Deferred/Caution N/A $8,000,000 Service line: Bonnie View (Acacia and Eucalyptus) Deferred/Caution 5 $2,880,000 4” S. Oakdale & S. Marcella (E Rialto and Allen) Deferred/Caution 5 $3,600,000 Cedar Reservoir 2, Overhaul, and Dome Preservation Deferred/Caution 4.5 $3,000,000 Well “City 3A” Groundwater Treatment System Deferred/Caution N/A $7,200,000 Service Line, Hydrant Laterals, Etiwanda Deferred/Caution 4.5 $4,200,000 Serviceline&Hydrant: Woodcrest, Yucca, etc Deferred/Caution 4.5 $2,400,000 Service Line: Cedar & Larch Deferred/Caution 4.5 $2,640,000 Service Line & Hydrant: Palm, Orange, Olive, Date Deferred/Caution 4.5 $3,960,000 Deferred/Caution $41,320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Grant $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0
Approved/Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Priority $8,640,000 $0 $8,640,000 $0 $0 $0
39 Wastewater Project
Profiles
40 WWTP Biosolids Upgrades Project
Wastewater Priority CIP (Status: APPROVED, Reserve-Funded) Description
Replace existing Belt Presses #1 and #2 with new Dewatering equipment. AECOM reviewed five technologies and identified Centrifuge technology as having the best lifecycle value. Replace existing Gravity Belt Thickeners #1 and #2 with new sludge thickening equipment. AECOM reviewed five technologies and identified Rotary Drum Thickeners as the best-value technology because of relatively low capital and operational costs, common use in the industry, a record of high performance, and low level of technological complexity. Bring Digester #1 online to allow Digester #2 to be cleaned, inspected and repaired. Digester #1 was last retrofitted in 2003 and has been inoperable for several years. Digester #2 Dystor lid is past its expected service life and is showing major wear. Any disruption in the operation of Digester #2 and its aged lid would burden the project with extensive cost in emergency repairs and rental equipment. Dystor covers will be also be replaced. The holding tank cover was removed in 2021 due to rust damage including multiple holes which greatly compromised the cover’s integrity. SCAQMD has required that it be replaced with a fixed lid. Furthermore, additional storage tank mixing is required to keep solids in suspension within the tank and provide a consistent and uniform feed to the new dewatering facility.

Fiscal Year 2025-26
Total Project Cost $36,972,421 Already Spent: $1,374.034 FCWA Amount: $35,598,387 Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status Approved, Reserve-Funded
Notes:

The Centrifuge system was identified as the best-value technology because of relatively low capital cost, common use in the industry, high record of performance, and relatively low technological complexity. Most importantly, centrifuges remove 6% more water than other technologies, producing lighter and drier cake. If installed at the plant, centrifuges would save an estimated $120,000 per year on hauling costs over Belt Filter Presses, noting Jacobs estimated significant additional annual savings. 41 Upsizing Sewer Mains in Sycamore Ave. and Baseline Rd.

Wastewater Priority CIP – Master Plan Project
Description
Construct a dedicated 8" sewer main downstream of the Sycamore Sewer Lift Station to Baseline Road. These flows will join the flows in the current sewer main in Sycamore Ave. and then be conveyed to Acacia Ave. via a newly constructed 15" sewer main in Baseline Road.

Fiscal Year 2025-26
Estimated Cost $5,520,000
Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Project Initiation Memo complete. Pending final authorization.

Reason for inclusion
Pipeline identified in 2022 Wastewater Master Plan. This choke point in the collection system has been known for many years and requires significant maintenance efforts until a capital project provides a permanent fix. The need for the project has been recently reaffirmed in the Wastewater Maste r Plan and a conceptual design has been identified.
42 Agua Mansa Lift Station
Wastewater Priority CIP – Master Plan Project
Description
Upgrade [and increase capacity of] the Agua Mansa Lift station pump, and add emergency diesel generator and security features.

Fiscal Year [2025-26]
Estimated Cost $3,600,000
Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Pending for project initiation memo development.

Reason for inclusion
Required to expand the capacity of the lift station for development south of Santa Ana Avenue. Lift station is in need of an upgrade and emergency backup generator.

Notes
Project scope specifically: Removal of existing pumps, installation of new pumps, removal and disposal of existing pump inlet and discharge piping and valving including replacement of existing pipe and pump supports inside the wet well, installation of new pump discharge piping and valving, minor concrete repairs to above grade portions of the wet well, minor demo and repair of existing wet well structure to accommodate new pumps, installation of new wet well lid and access hatches, removal and replacement of existing blower and duct work, install new electrical equipment and generator and demolish old electrical equipment, remove and replace chain link fence and entry gate, install flow meters and flowmeter vault with new access hatch, and other appurtenances.
43 Ayala Lift Station Upgrades and Repair
Wastewater Priority CIP
Description
Implement safety systems, provide SCADA communication & controls to WWTP , provide adequate standby pumping for pump redundancy, upgrade smaller 14 Hp pump to 28 Hp pump, new pump control panel, improved area lighting, new discharge piping, new discharge valves, fall protection anchor system, dual pump rail system, fall protection hatch.

Fiscal Year [2026-27]
Estimated Cost $3,000,000
Condition Score 4.5
Criticality Score 4
Status
Pending project development and initiation memo to be drafted once 26/27 fiscal year commences.

Reason for inclusion
Station working without SCADA leaves opportunity for alarm failure to allow pump failure to go unnoticed. Benefits include the ability to view flows, levels, and other data from the lift station, provide necessary safety controls at site, and provide reliable pump redundancy. 44 Upsizing Sewer Mains in N. Willow Ave.

Wastewater Priority CIP – Master Plan Project
Description
Upsize sewer main to a 12" line in N. Willow Ave. from W. Grove St. to Foothill Blvd. to meet current and future flows.

Fiscal Year 2027-28
Estimated Cost $600,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Pending project development and initiation memo to be drafted once 27/28 fiscal year commences.

Reason for inclusion
Pipeline identified in 2022 Wastewater Master Plan.
45 Upsizing Sewer Mains in Acacia Ave.

Wastewater Priority CIP – Master Plan Project
Description
Upsize 12" sewer main to an 18” line in Acacia Ave. from E. Bonnie View Dr. to E. South St. to meet current and future flows.

Fiscal Year 2026-27
Estimated Cost $600,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Pending project development and initiation memo to be drafted once 26/27 fiscal year commences.

Reason for inclusion
Pipeline identified in 2022 Wastewater Master Plan.
46 Upsizing Sewer Mains in Merrill Ave.

Wastewater Priority CIP – Master Plan Project
Description
Upsize sewer main to a 21" line in Merrill Ave. from S. Sycamore Ave. to S. Acacia Ave. to meet current and future flows.

Fiscal Year 2026-27
Estimated Cost $2,400,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Pending project development and initiation memo to be drafted once 26/27 fiscal year commences.

Reason for inclusion
Pipeline identified in 2022 Wastewater Master Plan.
47 Upsizing Sewer Mains in Sycamore Ave.

Wastewater Priority CIP – Master Plan Project
Description
Upsize 15” sewer main to a 18" line in Sycamore Ave. from E. Huff St. to E. Randall Ave. to meet current and future flows.

Fiscal Year 2027-28
Estimated Cost $1,800,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Pending project development and initiation memo to be drafted once 26/27 fiscal year commences.

Reason for inclusion
Pipeline identified in 2022 Wastewater Master Plan.
48 Secondary EQ Influent
Filter Pump 1, 2 & 3
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
49 Plant 5 Secondary Clarifiers
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
50 Plant 5 Aeration Basins
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
51 Overhaul of Headworks
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
52 Spencer Blowers R/R
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
53 Barscreen #1 Replacement
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
54 Disk Filter 4 Redundancy
–
Wastewater Priority CIP
55 Manhole Replacement
Wastewater Priority CIP
Description
Annual budget for manhole replacement is set at $240,000. Manholes are selected for replacement based on condition, which is noted during routine operations such as inspections, Hot List maintenance using frequent cleaning/jetting, and CCTV monitoring.

Fiscal Year All
Estimated Cost $240,000 per year
Condition Score Poorest-condition manholes will be selected for replacement, starting with the 5s Criticality Score Preference given to manholes with higher criticality, starting with the 5s Status
Ongoing
Reason for inclusion
Manhole rehabilitations are a necessary part of collection system maintenance and prevent manhole collapse and street damage.

Notes
Replacement cost could be reduced by coordination with Public Works prior to their planned street repairs and improvements for greater economies of scale.

This is routine work and should be funded through ORR. Individual manhole replacement projects generally have costs in the range of ORR projects. 56 Aged Sewer Main Replacement
Wastewater Priority CIP
Description
Replace aged sewer mains as identified by master plan, timing of paving projects, assessments or observations by collections crews, and CCTV footage and analysis.

Fiscal Year 2028-29, 2029-30
Estimated Cost $1,200,000 per year
Condition Score Those scoring in the poorest condition based on CCTV will be selected.

Criticality Score Higher criticality mains will be given preference.

Status
Ongoing.

Reason for inclusion
Some sanitary sewer lines are undersized and/or deteriorated and must be replaced to prevent impacts such as further degradation, infiltration, exfiltration, SSOs, and potentially private and public property damage. The Baseline Facility Record identifies the main lines that are in critical need of total replacement. This Record is updated each year and as field inspections are conducted and CCTV data is collected and analyzed, annual updates are made accordingly.

Notes
Costs can possibly be reduced by coordinating with Public Works prior to street repairs or improvements. 57 Water Project Profiles
58 Main Line Replacement on Etiwanda Ave.

Water Priority CIP
Description
Replace aged water main line between Riverside Ave. and Sycamore Ave. along Etiwanda Ave. This is stemming from a prospective pavement project.

Fiscal Year 2025-26
Estimated Cost $8,040,000
Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Planning complete. Pending for City direction.

Reason for inclusion
The water main and service lines have exceeded their lifespan and have a long history of repeated leaks, including several recent leaks which have been repaired. This project will replace 4,000 linear feet of 6” main line, 550 linear feet of service lines and associated service connections.

Notes
59 Pressure Relief Valves Zone 2 to Zone 3
Water Priority CIP – Master Plan
Description
Pressure Zone 3A has been experiencing lower pressures during peak water demands. Install new stations to meet and improve water supply.

Fiscal Year 2025-26
Estimated Cost $600,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Project is currently under design.

Reason for inclusion
With the increase in development in the City, the greater demand for water supply has arisen. This project would assist manage the demand. Further, Zone 2 to Zone 3 PRV station is aged, the vault is shallow and located in the main traffic lane of Riverside Ave. 60 AMI
Water Priority CIP – Grant Funded
Description
An Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) solution will automate the data collection of water meter information and to have more in-depth information on its customers’ usage and system operation.

Fiscal Year 2025-26
Estimated Cost $8,000,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Project is currently under RFP review.

Reason for inclusion
Rationale for project includes to: reduce costs through efficiencies and improve quality of service, empower customers to help manage their water consumption, provide a technology platform to meet the increased information needs of its customers. 61 Service Line Replacement – S. Alice Ave., S. Palm Ave., W. Vodden and Alru St.

Water CIP
Description
Replace aged service lines on South Alice, South Palm, West Vodden, and Alru St.

Fiscal Year 2025-26
Estimated Cost $1,440,000
Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Defer/Caution
Reason for inclusion
The water service lines have exceeded their lifespan and have a long history of repeated leaks, including several recent leaks which have been repaired. This project will replace 2,000 linear feet of 6” galvanized service lines and associated service connections. 62 Main and Service Line Replacement on Bonnie View Dr.

Water CIP
Description
Replace aged galvanized service lines on Bonnie View Dr. between Acacia Ave. and Eucalyptus Ave.

Fiscal Year 2026-27
Estimated Cost $2,880,000
Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Defer/Caution
Reason for inclusion
These water service and main lines have exceeded their lifespan and have a long history of repeated leaks, including several recent leaks which have been repaired. This project will replace 400 linear feet of service lines and associated service connections. 63 Cedar Reservoir 2 Overhaul and Dome Preservation
Water CIP
Description
The Cedar Reservoir overhaul will include metal works, dome and structural repairs, and improvements as to be determined by the upcoming cleaning and inspection under OR&R 1819-02.

Fiscal Year 2027-28
Estimated Cost $3,000,000
Condition Score 4.5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Defer/Caution
Reason for inclusion
The reservoir has exceeded its life span by 50 years and was revealed during an inspection to have significant deterioration and corrosion of interior and exterior surfaces. The overhaul will address any aged or defective components in order to extend the life of the asset and prevent catastrophic near-term failure resulting in a loss of storage capacity.

64 Main and Service Line Replacement on S. Oakdale Ave. and S. Marcella Ave.

Water CIP
Description
Replace aged main and service lines on S. Oakdale and S. Marcella between E. Rialto Ave. and Allen St.

Fiscal Year 2026-27
Estimated Cost $3,600,000
Condition Score 5
Criticality Score 5
Status
Defer/Caution
Reason for inclusion
The water main and service lines have exceeded their lifespan and have a long history of repeated leaks, including several recent leaks which have been repaired. This project will replace 2,300 linear feet of 4” steel main line, 2,000 linear feet of service lines, and associated service connections. 65 Service Line and Hydrant Lateral Replacement on Woodcrest, Yucca, Miramonte, Althea, Manzanita, and Arrowhead Streets
Water CIP
Description
Replace aged mainline, service line, hydrant laterals, and hydrants on Woodcrest, Yucca, Miramonte, Althea, Manzanita, and Arrowhead Streets, in triangle created by Bloomington Ave., S. Lilac Ave., and W. San Bernardino Ave.

Fiscal Year 2028-29
Estimated Cost $2,400,000
Condition Score 4.5
Criticality Score 4.5
Status
Defer/Caution
Reason for inclusion
Service line laterals installed in the late 1980 to late 1990’s had a high rate of failure less than a decade after their installation due to failures in the plastic laterals. This project will allow control of replacement rather than expensive mitigation of failures. Over the years, 17% of the service lines have been replaced with copper. This project would focus on the remaining 115 service lines, 10 hydrant laterals and hydrants, and 24 service valves that require replacement. 66 Service Line and Hydrant Lateral Replacement on Palm, Orange, Olive and Date Streets Water CIP
Description
Replace aged service line, hydrant laterals, and hydrants on Palm, Orange, Olive and Date Streets between Foothill Blvd. and the train tracks.

Fiscal Year 2029-20
Estimated Cost $3,960,000
Condition Score 4.5
Criticality Score 4.5
Status
Defer/Caution
Reason for inclusion
World War II era lateral piping is still in service and must be replaced as a large project before failure. This pipe has exceeded its expected service life and some failures have already occurred. Historically, there have been over 40 laterals that have been replaced due to leaks, but the remainder of the lines should be scheduled for replacement as one project. This is approximately 7,000 linear feet of piping, 340 service lines and meters, 40 hydrant laterals and hydrants, and 107 valves. 67 APPENDIX Additional
Projects Profiles
68 Rialto Habitat & Nature Center
Wastewater Additional Projects
Description
The RHNC is expected to be located at or near the city’s old retention basin east of Riverside Avenue, between Santa Ana Avenue and Agua Mansa Road. The RHNC will utilize recycled water from the wastewater treatment plant, and is designed to create benefits of habitat management and open space/educational facilities.

Fiscal Year [2025-26]
Grant Funding $8,000,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Additional Projects, Grant Funded
69 Demolition of Plants 1 & 2
Wastewater – Additional Projects
Description
Demolish obsolete Plants 1 and 2 at WWTP .

Fiscal Year NA
GMP Cost $2,832,000
Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Additional Projects
Reason for inclusion
Plants 1 & 2 were abandoned in early 2000 and 2020 respectively. Plants 1 and 2 collect water and pose odor and vector issues. 70 WWTP Electrical System Upgrades and Backup Power (CoGen) Wastewater Additional Projects
Description
Rework and consolidate the electrical system at the WWTP to tie diesel generators to plant and support a power backup solution.

Fiscal Year NA
GMP Cost $10,368,000 (electrical upgrades) + $24,744,000 (CoGen) Condition Score N/A
Criticality Score N/A
Status
Additional Projects
Reason for inclusion
The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has raised concerns that a reliable backup power system is not available at the WWTP . Plants 1-4 and 5 are not in a common electrical loop, and it is currently impossible to support the whole plant with emergency backup generators. Plant 5 electrical connection powers all the processes except the Disk Filter and tertiary treatment, which is still fed from the Plant 1-4 circuit. A single electrical loop is required to connect to all critical equipment and processes in the Rialto WWTP . This project will also provide the electrical infrastructure needed to support any new asset e.g. CoGen use of methane to produce power. 71 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-25-0594, Version: 1, Agenda #:

For Water Subcommittee Meeting September 18, 2025
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Tanya Williams, City Manager
FROM: Nicole Hemmans, Senior Administrative Analyst
Update on the Biosolids Project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant Provided by RWS/Veolia’s Management Team.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:

Rialto Water Services (RWS) will present a progress update on the Biosolids Project following its approval by the City Council and the Rialto Utility Authority on August 12, 2025. This update includes key milestones related to design-build (DB) contract execution, procurement timelines, equipment manufacturing, and the overall project schedule through early 2026.

DB Contracts and Project Schedule
· DB Contracts (Veolia, W.M. Lyles, AECOM) - in process, completion by August 27, 2025 · Notification of procurement to equipment vendors - September 2, 2025 · Purchase Orders issued - September 2025
· Shop drawings (long-lead equipment) - October-December 2025 · Manufacturing of long-lead equipment - Q1 2026 (January-February) · Design process to 100% completion - December 31, 2025 · Mobilization - Q1 2026 (January 2026)
· Equipment delivery - Q2 2026 (initiation of major onsite construction; construction activity tied closely to delivery schedule)

ATTACHMENT(S)
None
City of Rialto Printed on 9/15/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
72 City of Rialto
Legislation Text
File #: WS-25-0598, Version: 1, Agenda #:

For Water Subcommittee Meeting September 18, 2025
TO: Water Subcommittee Members
APPROVAL: Tanya Williams, City Manager
Utilities Director Update:

1. Update on the Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Project

2. Veolia’s Monthly Operations Reports (MOR): August 2025 (reporting period June 2025) City of Rialto Printed on 9/15/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
73 RWS/Veolia
Monthly Operations Report
August 2025
Reporting period June 2025
74 RIALTO

CUSTOMER SERVICE & REVENUE

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT

Reporting Period:

June 2025

Prepared for: Rialto Water Services
Prepared by: Veolia Water West Operating Services
75 Table of Contents
I. CUSTOMER SERVICE SUMMARY............................................................................................. 3 II. CALL CENTER PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................. 3 III. AUTOMATED SERVICES ........................................................................................................... 3 IV. CONSUMPTION & BILLING ...................................................................................................... 4 A. Consumption .................................................................................................................... 4 B. Billing ................................................................................................................................ 4 V. REVENUE & AGING .................................................................................................................. 5 A. Revenue ........................................................................................................................... 5 B. Aging ................................................................................................................................ 6 C. Bad Debt........................................................................................................................... 6 VI. SERVICE ORDERS ..................................................................................................................... 7 VII. OTHER ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................... 7 VIII. REVENUE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 7 A. Revenue Summary ........................................................................................................... 7 B. Non Rate Revenue - Extraterritorial Customers ............................................................. 7 C. Non-Rate Revenue – Other ............................................................................................. 8 D. Development Impact Fees ............................................................................................... 8 E. Rialto Basin Water Rights and Leasing ........................................................................... 8 F. Payment Collection Method – Fiscal Year to Date ....................................................... 11 G. Cash Collections on Behalf of the City of Rialto-Prior Year Comparison ..................... 11 H. Non-Rate Revenue + Utility Revenue Collections Prior Year Comparison .................. 11 I. Non-Rate Revenue + Utility Revenue Collected Fiscal Year-to-Date ........................... 12 J. Increase in Cash Collections and Fund Distribution—Prior Year Comparison ............ 12 K. Non-Rate and Extraterritorial Customer Accounts Receivable Aging ......................... 13

76 3

I. CUSTOMER SERVICE SUMMARY
During this reporting month, the Customer Service team provided call service level of 85%.

Out of 1,479 inbound calls answered 1,256 answered within the first 30 seconds.

Water consumption has decreased by 9.8% when compared against previous month. When compared against last year, consumption has decreased by 15.4%. This increased value is due to one no-bill week in the beginning of the June. (~25%)

Sewer revenue has decreased by less than 1% compared to the prior month and increased by 5.5% from last year.

II. CALL CENTER PERFORMANCE
During this reporting month, service level was 85% with 1,256 out of 1,479 being answered within the first 30 seconds. Overall average wait time was thirty-three (33) seconds.

III. AUTOMATED SERVICES
About 12,586 or 55.2% of the rate payers have created log-ins to access their accounts online. Of these customers, with online access, 48.2% have chosen the e-bill option. This e-bill participation is 6.8% increase from June of the prior year.

77.3%

82.3% 81.4%

87.6% 91.0% 89.5% 86.8% 89.6% 88.8% 91.8% 89.1% 88.0% 85.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%
100.0%
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Answer in 30 Sec 1,267 1,275 1,146 1,030 1,193 982 1,100 1,091 1,153 1,183 1,148 1,120 1,256 Calls Answered 1,639 1,549 1,406 1,176 1,310 1,096 1,267 1,218 1,308 1,288 1,287 1,272 1,479 Service Level 77.3% 82.3% 81.4% 87.6% 91.0% 89.5% 86.8% 89.6% 88.8% 91.8% 89.1% 88.0% 85.0% Call Center Performance
Answer in 30 Sec Calls Answered Service Level
Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Number of Bills 22,372 22,410 22,425 22,470 22,541 22,571 22,575 22,587 22,604 22,657 22,694 22,705 22,770 Number of Bill Adjustments (during billing) 10 11 9 5 11 9 29 17 10 29 25 15 18 Automated Over the Phone Payments 2,058 2,250 2,310 2,050 2,483 2,092 2,436 2,509 2,040 2,509 2,454 2,276 2,578 Online Payment 7,457 9,828 9,302 7,538 9,302 7,804 10,320 9,747 7,676 9,912 9,798 8,434 9,800 E-bill Participants 5,683 5,731 5,770 5,814 5,855 5,922 5,959 5,997 6,031 6,069 5,969 6,000 6,074 Auto Pay Participants (New Portal) 4,165 4,221 4,273 4,278 4,305 4,343 4,367 4,420 4,467 4,536 4,554 4,630 4,696 PayNearMe 88 114 118 92 95 93 95 108 73 99 97 88 88
77 4

IV. CONSUMPTION & BILLING
A. Consumption
Water consumption has decreased by 9.8% when compared against previous month.

When compared against last year, consumption has decreased by 15.4%.

B. Billing
A total of 22,770 bills were mailed or sent out electronically in June. Billing accuracy was

99.9% with eighteen (18) requiring adjustments after bill generation.

January Feburary March April May June July August September October November December 2023 Water 228,173 155,716 166,787 182,460 204,254 261,868 356,836 339,778 378,728 282,726 276,127 306,012 2024 Water 206,431 180,655 200,494 182,612 212,666 337,500 324,399 361,294 446,508 312,312 360,721 253,250 2025 Water 259,394 284,167 203,166 212,580 316,422 285,524 0 50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
HCF
Billed Consumption Yearly Comparison Water
January February March April May June July August September October November December 2023 Sewer 58,591 49,302 49,159 63,252 52,718 57,019 65,743 60,617 68,539 65,798 63,762 66,131 2024 Sewer 55,865 50,136 60,877 55,837 54,976 64,339 64,897 68,143 79,931 67,254 73,871 63,136 2025 Sewer 58,347 65,403 51,489 50,598 58,461 59,483
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
HCF (hundred cubic feet)
Billed Consumption Yearly Comparison Sewer
(Commercial Only)
78 5

V. REVENUE & AGING
A. Revenue
Water revenue has decreased 6.3% when compared against the prior month and increased

2.2% when compared against previous year. Sewer revenue has decreased by less than 1% compared to the prior month and increased by 5.5% from last year. Increase of revenue in 2025 versus 2024 is due to rate modifications in January.

(Please consider the scale of the graph as doubled height does not mean double the amount)

January Feburary March April May June July August September October November December 2023 Water Sales $962,367.0 $787,207.0 $813,577.0 $841,086.0 $901,604.0 $1,044,220 $1,266,316 $1,227,744 $1,331,376 $1,098,822 $1,081,741 $1,155,329 2024 Water Sales $912,498.0 $852,016.0 $881,079.0 $864,955.0 $930,910.0 $1,229,951 $1,194,468 $1,291,723 $1,510,717 $1,170,740 $1,297,360 $1,038,617 2025 Water Sales $1,059,329. $1,249,252. $1,039,421. $1,064,341. $1,341,734. $1,257,370. $-
$200,000.00
$400,000.00
$600,000.00
$800,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$1,400,000.00
$1,600,000.00
Dollars ($)
Annual Water Sales Comparison
January Feburary March April May June July August September October November December 2023 Sewer Sales $2,184,085. $2,111,381. $2,110,125. $2,219,973. $2,142,863. $2,172,890. $2,243,741. $2,202,859. $2,264,521. $2,243,821. $2,233,990. $2,260,801. 2024 Sewer Sales $2,158,668. $2,147,783. $2,229,038. $2,190,195. $2,186,025. $2,260,077. $2,264,418. $2,288,863. $2,385,936. $2,295,859. $2,344,329. $2,264,375. 2025 Sewer Sales $2,227,202. $2,415,779. $2,331,147. $2,322,513. $2,384,586. $2,384,448. $1,950,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,050,000.00
$2,100,000.00
$2,150,000.00
$2,200,000.00
$2,250,000.00
$2,300,000.00
$2,350,000.00
$2,400,000.00
$2,450,000.00
Dollars ($)
Annual Sewer Sales
79 6

B. Aging
The total aging balance has decreased by 5.6%, see first table below. For balances >30-days only, water has increased 22.5% and wastewater has increased by 1.1%.

C. Bad Debt
$0.00
$500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$3,500,000.00
$4,000,000.00
Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Aging Balances in Dollars ($)
Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Water $1,300,485.7 $1,346,722.0 $1,087,642.2 $1,343,665.0 $1,143,400.0 $1,624,355.3 $1,354,212.1 $1,332,847.1 $1,419,698.0 $1,292,967.0 $1,111,102.8 $1,487,957.5 $1,432,711.8 Sewer $3,162,401.4 $2,151,944.5 $1,998,417.9 $2,352,406.8 $2,261,553.6 $3,013,219.8 $2,776,221.3 $2,648,132.6 $3,315,495.9 $3,196,836.5 $3,180,111.5 $3,719,707.7 $3,484,523.2 Historical Aging Totals
Water and Sewer
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Thousands
Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Water $397,106 $462,301 $336,164 $306,205 $385,519 $470,281 $570,310 $601,520 $396,891 $478,675 $359,409 $396,223 $485,523 Sewer $1,436,216 $496,224 $610,308 $638,310 $759,956 $938,055 $1,096,563 $1,180,220 $1,365,283 $1,421,880 $1,580,609 $1,793,227 $1,813,326 Aging Balances Over 30 Days Water and Sewer
(April 2021 forward contains both consumption and meter charges) 80 7

Thirty-one (31) accounts were sent to collections for a total amount of $11,427.40. These bad debts arise from customers moving out or selling the property and not closing the account with final payments.

VI. SERVICE ORDERS
325 service orders were initiated by the customer service team during the reporting month. Of this total, 79 service orders or 24.3% were due to occupant changes. 185 service orders were initiated to accommodate water disconnection for non-payment and reconnection of water services when customer set up (or reinstate) a payment arrangement with down payment.

VII. OTHER ACTIVITIES
2,004 notices of potential tax roll were sent out sent out during the month of June. We have received many additional calls related to tax roll letters. Total number of accounts and associated amount will be captured during the first week of July. We are expecting to tax roll about 80% of the accounts that were notified.

VIII. REVENUE REPORT
A. Revenue Summary
Cash Revenue is compiled and reconciled to the merchant account on a daily basis. Cash receipts and deposits are made daily and internal controls are reviewed regularly to ensure safeguarding of assets and proper recording of all transacti ons. Total revenue collected in June 2025 is $ 4,150,000 whereas Non-Rate Revenue is $ 279,000; Utility Revenue is $3,806,000 and Tax / Ambulance Revenue at $65,000.

RWS collects Utility User Taxes and Ambulance Fees on behalf of the City of Rialto. The Utility User Tax (UUT) rates are based on the total billed amount, therefore the collection fluctuates as billed amounts change. The total UUT charges collected in Ju ne 2025 and June 2024 are $60,000 and $199 ,000 respectively. The large variance in collection of UUT charges is due to the City exempting UUT charges to the Residential customers beginning January 2025 through December 2025. Ambulance Revenue is also collected on behalf of the City of Rialto totaling $5,000 in June 2025 and $5,000 in June 2024.

B. Non Rate Revenue - Extraterritorial Customers
RWS bills the City of Fontana $133,000 each month for extraterritorial sewer usage. 81 8

Colton Unified School District is in agreement with RWS to pay $5 ,000 monthly for sewage connections based on enrollment rates provided each school year.

An extraterritorial agreement to provide sewer service was executed between the City of Rialto and the County of San Bernardino —County Service Area 70, Zone BL (Bloomington).

This housing development project generates extraterritorial sewer service revenue of $20,000 per month.

The City has an agreement with Social Science Services dba Cedar House Life Change Center to provide extraterritorial sewer service providing sewer revenue of about $5,000 each month.

C. Non-Rate Revenue – Other
Other revenue is generated by leasing space for cell towers to AT&T, which has two leases at $2,073 and $1,500. Sprint lease is at a currently contracted rate of $2,000 each month.

Vertical Bridge also provides $2,400 a month of cell tower generated Revenue.

Rialto Bioenergy Solutions subleased a City property for $10,750 a month.

The City and San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District h ave entered into a Brine Line Capacity Agreement on June 23, 2021. This agreement pertains to the use of its interest in the SARI Line and discharge of certain brine waste to the SARI Line exclusively from the operation of Rialto Bioenergy Facilities with in the City’s boundaries. The revenue generated in this agreement consists of quarterly rent of $37,500 along with the Fixed Pipeline Capacity Fee of $3,300 per month and Fixed Treatment Plant Capacity Fee of $3,300 per month. In addition, a variable fee of any discharge costs are also billed.

The San Bernardino Valley Water District (SBVWD) reimburses RWS for water conservation programs provided to customers. A quarterly bill is delivered directly by the City.

D. Development Impact Fees
Development Impact Fees (“DIF”) are paid to the City of Rialto as various developments are completed in the City. As such, the City of Rialto receives monies from the various developments, which is then distributed to RWS. There was no DIF payment received in June of 2025.

E. Rialto Basin Water Rights and Leasing
A Standby Water Lease Agreement between Fontana Union Water Company and City of Rialto is in effect. For the Water 2023-2024 Water Year, RWS received a payment from San Bernardino County the amount of $332,624 for Standby Charges and Production Charge. 82 9

In addition, the County is also billed annually for Rialto Well #3’s summertime electricity costs based on peak usage.
83 10

Cash Collections by Payment Method – Rialto Water Services

Transaction Counts for Carrier Deposits, Remote Deposits, UB Bill Conc Service (EBOX), and Lockbox Deposits reflect number of batches deposited to the bank. Transaction counts for credit card POS, IVR, and Pay- Near-Me transactions are per number of customer payments. IVR payments are received and process by Paymentus on the day the transactions are made. General ledger are posted and accounted for the following day the payments are processed.

Payment Method Description Transaction Count JUNE 2025 % Carrier Deposits Cash deposits prepared per day for transport to US Bank. 20 $ 142,006 3% Remote Deposits Scanned batches of checks payments made at the customer service counter 20 463,713 11% EBOX Batches of electronic customer payments posted to
customer accounts at US Bank. 20 329,643 8%

PAYMENTUS - IVR /
Paymentus / Walk-in
Credit Card payment
Customer payments by credit cards and ACH / eCheck
payments through an Interactive Voice Response
system using a touchtone phone.Payments originated
from Merchant online service
14,543 2,220,158 52%
Lockbox Deposits Batches of customer payments mailed in to US Bank's lockbox 20 1,139,567 26% Pay Near Me Cash payment service that allows customers to pay at a local 7-Eleven, CVS, Walmart or Family Dollar stores. 99 12,969 0% Total Revenue per Bank $ 4,308,056 100.00% Recon to RUA Recap:

Adj detailed in RUA (157,956)
Prior mo. Correction
RUA increase in Cash $ 4,150,100
84 11

F. Payment Collection Method – Fiscal Year to Date

G. Cash Collections on Behalf of the City of Rialto-Prior Year Comparison

H. Non-Rate Revenue + Utility Revenue Collections Prior Year Comparison

Jul 2024 Aug 2024 Sep 2024 Oct 2024 Nov 2024 Dec 2024 Jan 2025 Feb 2025 Mar 2025 Apr 2025 May 2025 June 2025 Total % Carrier Deposits 122,310$ 116,600$ 111,287$ 121,951$ 89,627$ 122,268$ 120,688$ 117,076$ 137,735$ 134,742$ 123,958$ 142,006$ 1,460,248$ 3.08% Remote Deposits 227,143 953,011 373,642 394,629 613,264 685,915 291,981 1,113,745 471,688 802,083 664,958 463,713 7,055,772$ 14.87% EBOX 334,259 346,067 289,347 349,088 288,522 322,671 332,865 252,149 312,881 316,850 284,338 329,643 3,758,680$ 7.92% Paymentus, IVR, Credit Cards 1,827,817 1,855,221 1,688,345 2,034,573 1,499,559 2,049,055 2,011,139 1,553,121 2,179,266 1,939,784 1,725,899 2,220,158 22,583,937$ 47.60% Lockbox Deposits 1,169,619 1,273,243 1,089,604 1,285,860 903,561 1,175,827 1,098,091 706,631 1,025,831 821,238 749,957 1,139,567 12,439,029$ 26.22% Pay Near Me 14,561 14,530 10,989 11,968 10,491 12,923 12,774 7,957 12,063 11,624 11,011 12,969 143,861$ 0.30% Total Revenue to Bank 3,695,709$ 4,558,672$ 3,563,214$ 4,198,069$ 3,405,024$ 4,368,659$ 3,867,538$ 3,750,679$ 4,139,464$ 4,026,321$ 3,560,122$ 4,308,056$ 47,441,527$ 100.00% NSF (7,962) (4,946) (8,970) (8,951) (21,124) (20,764) (9,479) (10,322) (8,496) (9,457) (10,260) (10,989) (131,720)$ Net deposits 3,687,747$ 4,553,726$ 3,554,244$ 4,189,118$ 3,383,900$ 4,347,895$ 3,858,059$ 3,740,357$ 4,130,968$ 4,016,864$ 3,549,862$ 4,297,067$ 47,309,807$ June 2025 June 2024 Variance
UUT Water 22,145$ 59,538$ (37,393)$
UUT Sewer 37,806 139,831 (102,025)
Ambulance 5,436 4,617 819
Total 65,387$ 203,987$ (138,600)$
June 2025 June 2024 Variance
Non-Rate / Extra Territorial
Revenue 278,640$ 303,414$ (24,773)$
Utility Revenue 3,806,072$ 2,621,277$ 1,184,795
Total 4,084,713$ 2,924,691$ 1,160,022$
85 12

I. Non-Rate Revenue + Utility Revenue Collected Fiscal Year-to-Date

J. Increase in Cash Collections and Fund Distribution—Prior Year Comparison

Jul 2024 Aug 2024 Sept 2024 Oct 2024 Nov 2024 Dec 2024 Jan 2025 Feb 2025 Mar 2025 Apr 2025 May 2025 June 2025 Total Non-Rate Revenue
Cell Tower Rent,Llease 5,647 19,985 21,506 66,161 55,391 9,235 12,824 29,957 55,985 66,904 19,985 61,074 424,653 Interest Income 19,290 9,559 - - - - - - - - 9,000 6,432 44,281

NRR-FOG - - - - - - - - - - - - - Municipal Water Sales - - - - 332,624 - - - - - - - 332,624 Extra Terr- Sewage 31,463 252,123 161,340 185,039 136,360 128,586 145,544 225,208 159,667 346,473 - 204,367 1,976,170 Abatement of Expenses - - - - - - - - - - - - - Water Meter Lost/Damaged/Repl 1,419 710 2,129 5,171 - - 4,924 492 36,930 10,601 26,256 - 88,633 Misc Fees - New Occ., Same Day Svc 5,877 4,453 4,939 5,629 3,067 5,525 5,945 6,069 6,060 6,400 6,726 6,769 67,459 Miscellaneous Revenue - Sewer - - - - - - - - - - - - - NSF - 342 - 152 35 - 30 - - - - - 559 Total Non-Rate Revenue 63,696$ 287,172$ 189,914$ 262,152$ 527,477$ 143,346$ 169,267$ 261,726$ 258,642$ 430,379$ 61,967$ 278,640$ 2,934,378 Utility Revenue -
Water Penalty 3,154 15,321 10,183 5,903 2,602 720 101 6,016 16,300 23,990 27,506 29,660 141,456 Sewer Penalty 5,200 33,061 18,283 7,639 3,313 1,435 700 11,411 33,426 40,185 43,522 59,088 257,263 Turf Removal, Hi-Eff Rebate (1,000) (100) - - - - - - - (1,000) - - (2,100) Water Deposits Billed 17,289 8,629 9,906 8,629 8,686 10,057 11,411 11,856 20,052 16,614 13,908 11,479 148,516 Hydrant Deposits 574 - - - 420 282 - - 702 - - - 1,978 Sewer Deposits Paid - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sewer Deposits Billed 11,760 12,823 9,518 10,900 15,201 8,822 11,737 8,959 18,436 10,612 14,975 12,427 146,170 Water 1,171,886 1,540,256 1,194,449 1,386,681 884,906 1,229,369 1,086,436 1,126,085 1,161,792 1,223,012 976,785 1,237,149 14,218,806 Sewer 2,327,246 2,418,456 1,959,890 2,448,917 1,669,263 2,454,711 2,380,281 1,745,679 2,469,796 2,345,182 1,902,496 2,474,297 26,596,214 Unapplied Credits (101,077) (54,176) (140,916) (81,949) (69,090) (35,829) (43,709) (83,121) (42,584) (20,663) (61,290) (18,027) (752,431) Bad Debt Sewer 12,029 9,909 - - - - 4,560 - - - 6,647 - 33,145 Bad Debt Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tax Roll Sewer 15,596 2,790 - - - 22,950 399,116 474,784 8,462 3,652 488,565 - 1,415,915 Collection Agency - Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - Collection Agency - Sewer - - - - - - - - - - - - - Collection Agency - Misc Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Utility Revenue 3,462,657$ 3,986,969$ 3,061,313$ 3,786,720$ 2,515,301$ 3,692,517$ 3,850,633$ 3,301,669$ 3,686,382$ 3,641,584$ 3,413,115$ 3,806,072$ 42,204,933$ Total Non-Rate + Utility Rev. 3,526,353 4,274,141 3,251,227 4,048,872 3,042,778 3,835,863 4,019,900 3,563,395 3,945,024 4,071,963 3,475,082 4,084,713 45,139,311 Increase to Cash
per Incode
Adjustments
Required to GL
Cash
Fund 660-Sewer Fund 670-Water Total Cash Per GL Adjustments To Match RUA to Bank
Cash/CC/Cks
Deposit To Bank
June 2025 4,150,100 11,594 2,787,013 1,351,493 4,150,100 157,956 4,308,056 June 2024 3,128,677 9,057 2,129,566 990,054 3,128,677 15,389 3,144,067 86 13

K. Non-Rate and Extraterritorial Customer Accounts Receivable Aging

AT&T makes annual payment of one cell tower rent and monthly dues on the other. The customer is current with its payments.

Social Science Service (Cedar House) balance reflects current service fees.

City of Fontana is current with its obligations.

Colton Unified School District is current with its obligations.

County of San Bernardino has been contacted for past due balance.

Rialto Bioenergy Solutions RWS shows a credit balance due to payments made for July Rent in June.

Vertical Bridge Holdco, LLC and Sprint: Vertical Bridge and Sprint have been contacted for open Invoices as well.

Name
Total as of
6/30/2025 Current 31 to 60 days 61 to 90 days >90 days
AT&T - Easton -$ -
Cedar House 9,251 9,251
CITY OF FONTANA 133,713 133,713
Colton Unified School District - - County of San Bernardino-CSA 70 BL 20,948 20,948 Rialto BioEnergy Facilities (37,500) (48,250) 10,750 Sprint-Nextel 3,456 3,456
San Bernardino Co Waste System Div. - - SB Valley Mun Water District - - Vertical Bridge Holdco, LLC (CIG) 7,544 2,830 4,714 Grand Total 137,412$ 97,545$ 20,948$ -$ 18,920$ 87 1

RIALTO WATER

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT

Reporting Period:

June 2025

Prepared for: Rialto Water Services
Prepared by: Veolia Water West Operating Services

88 2

RIALTO WATER

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE REPORT

Contents
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
A. Water Production Totals 4
B. Static Water Levels 6
II. REGULATORY 7
A. Regulatory Submittals 7
B. Sample Site Location Results 8
C. Violations 10
D. Source Water Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 10
III. HEALTH AND SAFETY 10
A. Monthly Safety Program Overview 10
IV. CHEMICAL USE 10
V. ELECTRICAL USE 11
VI. WATER QUALITY COMPLAINTS 11
VII. OPERATIONS UPDATE 11
A. Operational Wells 12
B. Valve Activity 12
C. Hydrant Flushing 12
D. Sanitary Survey 13
VIII. ASSET MANAGEMENT 13
A. Main Breaks, Service Leaks, Adverse Water Quality and Health/Safety Issues 13 B. Major Equipment and/or Machinery Outages 13
IX. RAINFALL TOTALS 14

89 3

RIALTO WATER

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Highlights of this month’s Water O&M report include the following:
• The water distribution network achieved compliance with all permit requirements.
• No sample anomalies that require secondary sampling.
• No significant issues with water availability. The purchasing of water remained consistent and daily equalization tanks levels remained at anticipated volume for customer availability.
• The Preventative Maintenance Program, as well as Valve Exercising, continues to identify areas of focus for our Routine Repair and Replacement.

90 4

A. Water Production Totals
Total water delivered into the Rialto system this month was 1039.92 acre-feet. 878.34 acre- feet was delivered into the system from the groundwater wells (City 4A production is included in the well total). 49.65 acre-feet was delivered via the BLF transmission system (City 4A production has been deducted). 111.93 acre-feet came from the OPRTP.

DATE Chino 2 City 2 Rialto 3 Rialto 5 Miro 3 EW-1 City 4A BOOSTER 6-9 Cactus 1 OPRTP 2 TOTAL3 6/1/25 3.08 11.51 6.98 0.00 6.00 0.00 10.40 6.84 4.80 4.41 43.62 6/2/25 0.00 8.14 5.17 0.00 5.78 0.00 4.35 1.35 6.45 3.59 30.48 6/3/25 0.00 8.71 7.09 0.00 6.33 0.00 4.86 3.11 3.95 3.55 32.74 6/4/25 0.00 8.70 7.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.86 3.11 4.84 3.79 27.69 6/5/25 0.00 7.60 7.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.45 3.97 5.07 3.78 27.58 6/6/25 0.00 13.12 7.12 0.00 5.65 0.00 11.42 1.97 1.15 3.91 32.92 6/7/25 0.00 10.93 5.69 0.00 4.07 0.00 11.36 0.00 9.83 3.71 34.23 6/8/25 0.00 8.39 7.19 0.00 8.49 0.00 6.14 4.15 5.99 4.79 39.00 6/9/25 0.00 5.61 5.56 0.00 6.19 0.00 3.52 0.78 5.85 2.55 26.54 6/10/25 4.80 2.52 6.59 0.00 6.72 0.00 9.77 4.61 5.23 3.61 34.08 6/11/25 5.21 0.11 6.73 0.00 6.61 0.00 9.04 6.96 5.03 3.76 34.41 6/12/25 4.48 1.80 5.56 0.00 6.41 0.00 8.64 3.63 4.80 3.83 30.51 6/13/25 4.73 2.06 6.4 0.00 6.61 0.00 7.55 0.16 4.75 3.33 28.04 6/14/25 3.81 0.00 7.25 0.00 6.64 0.00 9.65 0.32 5.85 3.15 27.02 6/15/25 7.90 0.00 7.12 0.00 6.6 0.00 10.59 9.57 5.35 5.57 42.11 6/16/25 5.58 0.58 5.39 0.00 6.21 0.00 7.78 5.00 6.24 2.74 31.74 6/17/25 4.82 3.98 8.49 0.00 6.54 0.00 8.62 5.05 5.92 3.67 38.47 6/18/25 5.21 4.87 5.51 0.00 3.31 0.00 8.31 4.73 6.13 3.51 33.27 6/19/25 5.85 10.77 7.39 0.00 5.05 0.00 9.62 3.47 4.27 4.50 41.30 6/20/25 3.99 10.30 6.13 0.00 5.90 0.00 9.48 0.99 6.57 3.21 37.09 6/21/25 5.39 8.42 6.2 0.00 6.45 0.00 4.06 0.00 4.87 3.42 34.75 6/22/25 6.04 0.06 6.91 0.00 6.70 0.00 9.91 8.52 5.60 4.79 38.62 6/23/25 5.42 0.00 5.39 0.00 6.39 0.00 6.73 6.08 6.06 2.76 32.10 6/24/25 4.64 1.64 7.02 0.00 7.33 0.00 9.81 5.99 5.90 3.70 36.22 6/25/25 5.65 2.85 5.3 0.00 5.52 0.00 8.78 4.11 5.51 4.14 33.08 6/26/25 4.61 3.11 6.36 0.00 6.64 0.00 8.15 3.72 5.58 3.11 33.13 6/27/25 5.42 0.00 7.37 0.00 7.82 0.00 9.03 0.00 6.75 3.79 31.15 6/28/25 5.45 0.00 5.49 0.00 5.73 0.00 9.71 0.00 4.57 4.31 25.55 6/29/25 5.45 5.96 5.74 0.00 6.04 0.00 9.71 2.11 6.13 4.31 35.74 6/30/25 4.77 5.31 7.17 0.00 7.24 0.00 7.00 1.76 6.50 2.64 35.39 TOTAL 112.30 147.05 194.72 0.00 174.97 0.00 249.30 102.06 196.89 111.93 1039.92 MIN 0.00 0.00 5.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 1.15 2.55 25.55 MAX 7.90 13.12 8.49 0.00 8.49 0.00 11.42 9.57 9.83 5.57 43.62 AVE 3.74 4.90 6.49 0.00 5.83 0.00 8.31 3.40 5.52 3.73 33.62 3 City 4A is not included in total. It has been accounted for in the Purchased total.

JUNE 2025 DAILY PRODUCTION TOTALS IN ACRE FEET
Delivered Via BLF
Purchased
1 Measured at point of connection at Cactus Reservoir site including production from City 4A. Amount may vary compared to billing. 2 Measured at point of connection at Cedar Reservoir site. Amount may vary as compared to billing. 91 5

MAY 2025 DAILY BOOSTER TOTALS IN ACRE FEET
DATE
Booster
1 Booster 2 Booster 3 Booster 4 Booster 5 Booster 6-9 Booster 10 Booster 11 6/1/25 0.00 0.00 13.97 0.00 1.35 6.84 0.00 0.00
6/2/25 0.00 0.00 5.32 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.00
6/3/25 0.00 0.00 7.82 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.00 0.00
6/4/25 0.00 0.00 5.79 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.00 0.00
6/5/25 0.00 0.00 5.79 0.00 0.00 3.97 0.00 0.00
6/6/25 0.00 0.00 4.60 0.00 4.71 1.97 0.00 0.00
6/7/25 0.00 0.00 11.55 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
6/8/25 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 1.30 4.15 0.00 0.00
6/9/25 0.00 0.00 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00
6/10/25 0.00 0.00 5.05 0.00 0.00 4.61 0.00 0.00
6/11/25 0.00 0.00 6.23 0.00 0.00 6.96 0.00 0.00
6/12/25 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.00 0.00 3.63 0.00 0.00
6/13/25 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00
6/14/25 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00
6/15/25 0.00 0.00 8.38 0.00 7.07 9.57 0.00 0.00
6/16/25 0.00 0.00 3.54 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00
6/17/25 0.00 0.00 5.71 0.00 0.00 5.05 0.00 0.00
6/18/25 0.00 0.00 8.48 0.00 0.00 4.73 0.00 0.00
6/19/25 0.00 0.00 10.26 0.00 0.00 3.47 0.00 0.00
6/20/25 0.00 0.00 4.93 0.00 1.24 0.99 0.00 0.00
6/21/25 0.00 0.00 3.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6/22/25 0.00 0.00 15.74 0.00 0.00 8.52 0.00 0.00
6/23/25 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 0.00 6.08 0.00 0.00
6/24/25 0.00 0.00 4.64 0.00 0.00 5.99 0.00 0.00
6/25/25 0.00 0.00 6.90 0.00 0.00 4.11 0.00 0.00
6/26/25 0.00 0.00 3.29 0.00 0.00 3.72 0.00 0.00
6/27/25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
6/28/25 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.00 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00
6/29/25 0.00 0.00 3.10 0.00 4.72 2.11 0.00 0.00
6/30/25 0.00 0.00 2.90 0.00 0.00 1.76 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.00 0.00 167.79 0.00 31.35 102.06 0.00 0.00
MIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAX 0.00 0.00 15.74 0.00 7.07 9.57 0.00 0.00
AVE 0.00 0.00 5.59 0.00 1.04 3.40 0.00 0.00

92 6

B. Static Water Levels
All City of Rialto wells are sounded each month, both active and inactive well sites.

Depth-to-water is measured from the well head to the static water surface.

Increases in depth-to-water represent a decrease in static water level.

Depth to Water
Wells Depth to
Pump
Historical Maximum
Depth to Water Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Chino # 1 (580 ft) In-
active well 429' 414' 412' 411' 411' 411' 410' 412' 414' 414' 413' 413' 413' Chino # 2 (550 ft) 369' 352' 347' 347' 343' 340' 342' 341' 335' 338' 335' 337' 334' City # 1 (260 ft) 392' 151' 150' 247' 247' 251' 121' 126' 121' 122' 119' 117' 119' City # 2 (480 ft) 402' 164' 171' 210' 137' 139' 147' 146' 128' 130' 128' 122' 129' City # 3 (525 ft) Out
of Service 505' 418 417' 416' 416' 417' 414' 414' 415' 416' 416' 414' 417' City # 4A (528 ft) 406' 380' 379' 380' 380' 380' 381' 374' 377' 375' 373' 362' 367' City # 5 (385 ft) In-
active well 364' 333' 334' 332' 322' 320' 318' 318' 321' 318' 318' 316' 316' Rialto # 1 (650 ft) In-
active well 588' 571' 571' 571' 553' 552' 561' 555' 571' 569' 565' 563' 564' Rialto # 2 (550 ft) In-
active well 502' 500' 501' 502' 501' 501' 499' 501' 496' 495' 502' 496' 498' Rialto # 3 (509 ft) 478' 477' 477' 473' 476' 473' 472' 473' 473' 472' 472' 470' 470' Rialto # 4 (450 ft) In-
active well 418' 416' 415' 418' 418' 414' 413' 414' 415' 416' 415' 415' 414' Rialto # 5 (560 ft) 387' 386' 385' 384' 384' 384' 385' 385' 384' 384' 386' 386' 387' Rialto Well # 7 In-
active well 362' 361' 362' 362' 362' 361' 362' 360' 360' 359' 353' 356' 354' Miro # 3 (563 ft) 492' 489' 487' 485' 485' 484' 484' 484' 484' 484' 483' 483' 481' EW-1 (780 ft) 476' 474' 475' 474' 473' 475' 475' 474' 472' 475' 475' 474' 475'

93 7

II. REGULATORY
All State of California and public health agency regulatory requirements were met.

A. Regulatory Submittals
• Monthly Summary of Distribution System Coliform Monitoring • NPDES Discharge Letter
• Conservation SAFER Report
Sample Test Result Standards
Type of Sampling Units of
Measure
Detectable Limit for
Reporting
Maximum Contaminant
Level
Total Coliform A -- --
E. Coli A -- --
Nitrate as N mg/L 0.20 10
Perchlorate (CLO4) μg/L 1.0 6.0
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L -- 500
P= Present
A= Absent
mg/L = parts per million
μg/L = parts per billion

Sample Date Sample Site Location Results
06/11/2025
Type of Sampling Chino
2 City
2 City
4A
Rialto
3 Rialto
5 Miro
3 EW-1

BLF
Cactus
BLF 6-
9 OPRT
P
Total Coliform A A A A A A OUT OF

SERVICE A A A
E. Coli A A A A A A A A A
Nitrate as N 3.2
Perchlorate (CLO4) 1.6* 6.4* 8.4*
Total Dissolved Solids 220 270 280 260 240 160 350 270 290 *Sample is from the well head so it is before disinfection & treatment. Treatment is performed before it goes into the distribution system. Water going into the distribution system is <1.0 (non-detect).

94 8

B. Sample Site Location Results
Rialto Distribution Sample Results
June 2025
Sample Location Free Cl Res (Field) Total Coliform E. Coli Apparent Color Odor Threshold Turbidity CYCLE 1 - 6/03/25 mg/l P/A P/A Color Units TON NTU
335 W. Rialto 1.00 A A
1228 W. Merrill 1.00 A A
256 N. Fillmore 1.00 A A
987 W. Grove 1.00 A A
978 N. Driftwood 1.00 A A
1451 N. Linden 1.00 A A
469 W. Jackson 1.20 A A
935 E. Mariposa 1.10 A A
1000 N. Joyce 1.20 A A
766 N. Chestnut 1.00 A A
149 W. Victoria 1.20 A A
313 E. McKinley 1.20 A A
609 E. South 1.20 A A
273 E. Alru 1.10 A A
1161 S. Lilac 1.30 A A
101 E. Valley 1.20 A A
CYCLE 2 - 6/10/25 mg/l P/A P/A Color Units TON NTU
210 N. Park 1.20 A A
101 S. Larch 1.00 A A
320 N. Wisteria 1.00 A A
861 W. Grove 1.00 A A
1168 N. Glenwood 1.00 A A
1320 N. Fitzgerald 1.00 A A
860 N. Willow 1.00 A A
209 E. Cornell 1.00 A A
643 E. Margarita 0.90 A A
1170 N. Terrace Rd. 0.90 A A
681 E. Erwin 0.90 A A
402 E. Merrill 1.00 A A
261 W. Wilson 1.40 A A
532 S. Iris 1.00 A A
281 W. Hawthorne 1.00 A A
379 W. Valley 1.10 A A

95 9

Rialto Distribution Sample Results
June 2025
Sample Location
Free Cl Res
(Field)
Total
Coliform
E.

Coli
Apparent
Color
Odor
Threshold Turbidity
CYCLE 3 - 6/17/25 mg/l P/A P/A Color Units TON NTU
236 N. Willow 1.00 A A
775 E. Foothill 0.90 A A
878 N. Primrose 1.00 A A
369 E. Van Koevering 0.90 A A
274 W. Valencia 0.90 A A
1566 N. Fillmore 0.90 A A
932 N. Idyllwild 0.90 A A
644 N. Smoketree 0.90 A A
605 W. Rosewood 0.90 A A
1189 W. Second 1.00 A A
775 W. Rialto 0.90 A A
211 E. Wilson 0.90 A A
595 E. Huff 0.80 A A
1005 S. Riverside 1.00 A A
794 S. Verde 1.00 A A
1055 W. Bloomington 1.00 A A
CYCLE 4 - 6/24/25 mg/l P/A P/A Color Units TON NTU
375 S. Cactus 1.00 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
101 S. Linden 1.10 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
234 N. Larch 1.00 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
575 N. Driftwood 1.00 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
1355 W. Shamrock 1.10 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
992 N. Yucca 0.90 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
481 W. Cornell 1.00 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
158. E. Shamrock 1.00 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
749 E. Holly 1.00 A A <3.0 1 0.13
545 E. Victoria 0.90 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
200 N. Sycamore 1.00 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
407 E. Allen 0.90 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
399 E. Montrose 1.10 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
856 S. Orange 1.10 A A <3.0 1 0.14
911 S. Cactus 1.10 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
220 W. Valley 1.10 A A <3.0 1 <0.10
P/A + Present or
Absent

96 10

C. Violations
No violations were received during this reporting period.

D. Source Water Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Veolia has a goal of maintaining an acceptable blended TDS level between all its sources. This goal is achieved by shifting production to or fro m the lowest TDS wells or purchased low TDS water while adhering to the overall water supply strategy and meeting system demands. The TDS was 2 53 mg/L for the month of June as compared to 2 23 mg/L in May . The TDS levels are below the secondary maximum contaminant level requirements.

III. HEALTH AND SAFETY
A. Monthly Safety Program Overview
Category Monthly Statistic
Safety Training Topics Asbestos Cement Pipe
Workplace Violence Prevention Plan
Lost Time Incidents, count* 0
Recordable Incidents, count 0
Near Miss Incidents, count 0
Vehicle Incidents, count 0
*A lost time incident has not occurred in the past 4278 days.

IV. CHEMICAL USE
Sodium hypochlorite is the only chemical added to the water system. A total of 2672 gallons of sodium hypochlorite was used in June as compared to 2214 gallons used in May.
97 11

V. ELECTRICAL USE
Southern California Edison (SCE) has not provided all of the data for June 2025. We will provide the data as it is received, thus will include yearly usage received to date.

SCE kWh
Year Month
Billed
Usage
2024 July 550,202
2024 August 650,431
2024 September 562,739
2024 October 529,208
2024 November 266,378
2024 December 247,546
2025 January 360,398
2025 February 293,062
2025 March 223,047
2025 April 427,509
2025 May 505,204
2024 June 574,577

VI. WATER QUALITY COMPLAINTS
No complaints were received during this reporting period.

VII. OPERATIONS UPDATE
The overall operational strategy is to meet the daily water demand. The City of Rialto water system has six operational wells, one of which is owned by the County of San Bernardino and operated by Veolia; Oliver P. Roemer Treatment Plant (OPRTP), which is jointly owned by the City (25%) and West Valley Water District (WVWD); purchased water through the Baseline Feeder (BLF) system from San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD); and, if required to meet demand, additional water can be supplied by the City of San Bernardino (CSB) through the BLF for emergency supply only with no guarantee of actual delivery. Water produced from City Well 4A discharges into the BLF and its production is included in deliveries from that shared transmission line when City Well 4A is in service.
98 12

The overall pumping strategy is based on adjudicated rights, well availability, remediation requirements, and quality of source, cost to operate, and varying weather conditions. TDS effluent concentrations for the City of Ria lto WWTP are taken into consideration when operating the facilities and water sources.

A. Operational Wells
EW-1 well was out of service due to pump issues.

B. Valve Activity
On the basis of information collected in 2019, Veolia now has a baseline assessment of all valves and has initiated a new cycle of valve exercising . 48 valves were exercised in the month of June.

Valve Turning Progress
Valves
Turned
2020 530
2021 340
2022 463
2023 750
2024 379
2025 301
C. Hydrant Flushing
There are 63 hydrant/dead ends that are flushed annually to maintain water quality. Zero flushings were performed in June.

Hydrant/Dead End Flushing
Progress
2025
January 0
February 0
March 6
April 6
May 11
June 0
Total 23
Progress % (37)
99 13

D. Sanitary Survey
DDW performed field site visit s on May 22 and August 22, 2024. The results of the sanitary survey were received on September 19, 2024. All minor deficiencies have been corrected and submitted to DDW.

VIII. ASSET MANAGEMENT
The following work orders were completed by Water production staff for the month of June:
• Preventive Maintenance –78
• Corrective Maintenance –0
• Predictive Maintenance –0
34– PMs planned for July 2025
A. Main Breaks, Service Leaks, Adverse Water Quality and Health/Safety Issues
The following work orders were completed by Water distribution staff for the month of June:
• Main line –2
• Service line –3
• Hydrants - 1
• Angle Meter Stop –17
• Meter Box & Lid Replacement –1
• Meter Leaks/ Replacements -24
B. Major Equipment and/or Machinery Outages
EW-1 well was out of service due to pump issues.

100
14 IX. RAINFALL TOTALS

101

RIALTO WASTEWATER

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT
Reporting Period:

June 2025
P
repared for: - Rialto Water Services
Prepared by: - Veolia Water West Operating Services
102

RIALTO WASTEWATER

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE REPORT

Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Collection System / Customer Service Log
a. Collection System Activities
b. S.S.O. dates
c. Customer Service Call Outs

2. Wastewater Treatment Plant - Monthly Overview
a. Significant events during the month

3. Treatment Facility Performance / Laboratory Activities a. See attached Monthly Performance Summary
B. Summary of Notices and Laboratory Tests / Reports filed with government agencies c. Effluent Specifications Exceedance Discussion

4. Monthly Safety Program Overview

5. Biosolids, Chemicals, and Utilities
a. Monthly Biosolids Production
b. Monthly Chemical Consumption
c. Monthly Utilities Consumption

6. Odor Complaints / Actions Taken

7. Major Equipment and/or Machinery Outages

8. Outside Agency Activities during the Month
a. Government agency or property insurance inspections
b. Government agency environmental, health, or safety tests/monitoring c. Government agency notice of violation received
d. Government agency monitoring
e. Other matters of concern

9. Complaint Logs

TABLES

● Treatment Facility – Monthly Performance Summary
● Collection System- Monthly Pipe Cleaned
103

RIALTO WASTEWATER

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Highlights of this month’s Wastewater O&M report include the following:

● The treatment plant performed well and met all compliance parameters. ● There were two residential call-outs for sewer-related issues.

1. Collection System/Customer Service Log

a. Collections group activities this month:

Category Current Month
Statistics
Prior Month Statistics 2025 Year to Date
Statistics
Sanitary sewers are cleaned using the
conventional method, including feet, which
includes “Hot spot cleaning.”
11,433 35,102 129,784
Sanitary sewers assessed using the SL-RAT
method, feet 15,189 35 15,224
CCTV Inspection, miles (26 is the annual goal)* 1.76 3.37 14.46 Manhole Inspections 0 1 31
USA Dig Alert Markings, count 35 28 236
Residential call outs 4 3 15
Sanitary sewer overflows 0 0 1

b. S.S.O. N/A
c. Customer Service Call Outs – See Item 9 for details.

2. Wastewater Treatment Plant – Monthly Overview
● NPDES discharge compliance parameters were achieved.

a. Significant events during the month were:

Received Notice of Violation from Regional Water Quality Control Board for self-reported violations for the time period 2009 - 2024

3. Treatment Facility Performance/Laboratory Activities

a. See the attached Table 1, Monthly Performance Summary.

b. Summary of Notices and Laboratory Tests/Reports filed with government agencies.

The monthly submittal of State/Federal discharge monitoring reports was completed promptly.

104

c. Effluent specification exceedance discussion
See Section 2 above. N/A

4. Monthly Safety Program Overview

Category Monthly Statistic
Safety Training Topics 0
Lost Time Incidents count* 0
Recordable Incidents, count 0
Near Miss Incidents, count 0
Vehicle Incidents, count 0

*A lost time incident has not occurred since 9-3-2020, totaling 1,760 days.

5. Biosolids, Chemicals, and Utilities

a. Monthly Biosolids Production

Biosolids Current Month
Statistics
Prior Month Statistics 2025 Year-to-Date
Statistics
Wet Tons Produced 1105.47 1,408.62 7,569.98

b. Monthly Chemical Consumption

Chemical Current Month
Gallons Used
Prior Month
Gallons Used
Sodium Hypochlorite, Tertiary Disinfection 29,783 29,766 Sodium Bisulfite, Discharge Dechlorination 9,526 11,166 Ferrous Chloride, Digester Gas Conditioning 4,318 4,398 Polymer, Gravity Belt Thickener 390 353
Polymer, Belt Filter Press 658 702
Alum, Tertiary Filters 2.25 1

105

c. Monthly Utilities Consumption

Utility Current Month Statistics Prior Month Statistics Electricity WWTP, KWH 424308 412,800 Electricity Lilac LS, KWH ** 896
Electricity Sycamore LS, KWH ** 526
Electricity Ayala LS, KWH ** 8482
Electricity Agua Mansa LS, KWH ** 3101
Electricity Cactus LS, KWH 1433 1433
Electricity Ramrod LS, KWH 576 623
Frisbee Park LS, KWH ** 684
El Rancho Verde LS, KWH 1986 1975
Natural Gas WWTP, Therms 5162 5969
* LS is in bypass mode, pending CIP completion
** SCE has not updated this account.

6. Odor Complaints Received/Actions Taken
No odor complaints were received this month.

7. Major Equipment and/or Machinery Outages
● Sludge Holding Tank
● Aeration Basin #1 is currently offline.

8. Outside Agency Activities during the Month
a. Government agency or property insurance inspections
None

b. Government agency environmental, health, or safety tests/monitoring Permit testing was completed for this month

c. Government agency notices of violation received
Received Notice of Violation from the Regional Water Quality Control Board for self-reported violations for the time period 2009 - 2024

d. Government agency monitoring
Routine monitoring reports were submitted.

e. Other matters of concern
None

106

9. Customer Service Callout Details Log

Date Address Comments Personnel Manhole To
Manhole
6/2/2025 1173 S. Cactus #38 The resident called to report roaches coming from a manhole. The technician applied roach bait to all seven manholes in the complex.

ET NA NA

6/2/2025 315 E. Romona A call was received from Public Works about an improperly placed manhole. The technician replaced the
manhole cover.

BVO NA NA
6/9/2025 735 Heather A resident called to report tree roots blocking her lateral.

The sewer line was checked and was flowing properly.

The homeowner was advised to call the city regarding the tree since we can not confirm whether it's a city tree.

ET NA NA
6/12/2025 578 S. Althea A resident called to report a blockage in their line. The city sewer line was clear upstream and downstream. The
resident was advised to call a plumber to check the
lateral, and that they needed to snake the main line.

ET NA NA

107

Table 1 Summary

108

Table 1 Summary MOR
June 2025
Rialto Rialto Rialto
Influent
daily flow
Effluent
Flow
Influent
BOD
Influent
BOD
Influent
BOD Load
Effluent
BOD
Effluent
BOD Load
BOD %
Removal
Influent
TSS
Influent
TSS Load
Effluent
TSS
Effluent
TSS Load
TSS %
Removal
Date MGD MGD mg/l mg/l lbs/day mg/L lbs/day % mg/L lbs/day mg/L lbs/day % 6/1/2025 7.09 7.96
6/2/2025 6.73 7.34 390 390 21,890 2.9 177.53 99.30 210.00 11787.00 1.00 61.00 99.50 6/3/2025 7.01 6.98
6/4/2025 7.18 7.02
6/5/2025 7.08 7.39 350 350 20,667 2.5 154.08 99.30
6/6/2025 6.95 7.52
6/7/2025 6.69 6.59
6/8/2025 7.14 7.55
6/9/2025 7.11 7.03 360 360 21,347 <2.5 146.58 99.30 250.00 14824.00 0.70 41.00 99.70 6/10/2025 7.03 7.20
6/11/2025 7.14 7.15
6/12/2025 6.66 7.31
6/13/2025 6.91 7.19 320 320 18,441 <10.0 599.65 96.90
6/14/2025 6.92 7.18
6/15/2025 7.29 7.41
6/16/2025 6.65 7.24 370 370 20,521 3.3 199.26 99.10 260.00 14420.00 2.00 121.00 99.20 6/17/2025 7.46 6.83
6/18/2025 6.95 7.49
6/19/2025 7.29 7.37
6/20/2025 7.36 7.32 310 310 19,029 <2.5 152.62 99.20
6/21/2025 6.30 7.10
6/22/2025 6.88 7.17
6/23/2025 7.03 7.32 280 280 16,416 3.8 231.99 98.60 200.00 11726.00 0.80 49.00 99.60 6/24/2025 6.86 6.96
6/25/2025 7.11 7.50
6/26/2025 7.02 7.10
6/27/2025 6.93 7.13 280 280 16,183 4.4 261.64 98.40
6/28/2025 6.81 7.24
6/29/2025 7.81 7.55
6/30/2025 6.01 7.31 360 360 18,044 3.1 188.99 99.10 250.00 12531.00 0.90 55.00 99.60 Minimum 6.01 6.59 280 280 16,183 <2.5 146.58 96.90 200.00 11726.00 0.70 41.00 99.20 Maximum 7.81 7.96 390 390 21,890 <10.0 599.65 99.30 260.00 14824.00 2.00 121.00 99.70 Total 209.40 217.45 3,020 3,020 172,538 <35.0 2112.33 889.20 1170.00 65288.00 5.40 327.00 497.70 Average 6.98 7.25 336 336 19,171 <3.9 234.70 98.80 234.00 13058.00 1.08 65.00 99.50 Rialto WRF\Effluent Rialto WRF\Influent Rialto WRF\Effluent 109

Table 2 Summary

110

Table 2 Summary MOR
June 2025
Rialto Rialto Rialto
Influent
Conductivity
Eff
Conductivity
Daily Ave
Influent
COD
Final
Efffluent
COD
Influent
TDS
Filter
Effluent
TDS

EFF FINAL
TDS
Influent
Inorganic
Nitrogen
Effluent
Inorganic
Nitrogen
Date (uS/cm) (uS/cm) mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/L mg/L mg/l as N 6/1/2025 1358.00 786.00
6/2/2025 1404.00 767.00
6/3/2025 1467.00 788.00
6/4/2025 1381.00 789.00
6/5/2025 1404.00 824.00 760 20.0 560.00 440.00 480.00 41.00 8.20 6/6/2025 1349.00 874.00
6/7/2025 1280.00 872.00
6/8/2025 1340.00 852.00
6/9/2025 1487.00 843.00
6/10/2025 1494.00 842.00
6/11/2025 1429.00 820.00
6/12/2025 1483.00 829.00
6/13/2025 1381.00 845.00
6/14/2025 1327.00 805.00
6/15/2025 1292.00 782.00
6/16/2025 1466.00 753.00
6/17/2025 1521.00 779.00
6/18/2025 1454.00 806.00
6/19/2025 1418.00 800.00
6/20/2025 1342.00 800.00
6/21/2025 1240.00 771.00
6/22/2025 1158.00 770.00
6/23/2025 1503.00 784.00
6/24/2025 1396.00 803.00
6/25/2025 1451.00 794.00
6/26/2025 1435.00 754.00
6/27/2025 1520.00 754.00
6/28/2025 1332.00 790.00
6/29/2025 1338.00 779.00
6/30/2025 1456.00 776.00
Minimum 1158.00 753.00 760 20.0 560.00 440.00 480.00 41.00 8.20 Maximum 1521.00 874.00 760 20.0 560.00 440.00 480.00 41.00 8.20 Average 1397.00 801.00 760 20.0 560.00 440.00 480.00 41.00 8.20 Rialto WRF\Effluent Rialto WRF\Eff Rialto WRF\Effluent
111

Table 3 Summary
*Cyanide was not available at the time of report completion

112

Table 3 Summary MOR
June 2025
Tranfer

Tranfer

Rialto

Tranfer Data
Influent pH 24 hr avg.
effl. pH
Effluent
Temp
Effluent
Ammonia
Effluent
Total
Coliform
Effluent
Coliform 7
Day Median
Effluent
Cyanide,
Free
Available
Eff Di(2-
ethylhexyl)
phthalate
(DEHP)
FIT- 8321
ADG #2
Flow
FIT- 8321
ADG #2
Flow
Natural Gas
Daily Use
FIT- 8321
ADG #2 Flow
Date SU SU Deg C mg/L MPN/100mL MPN/100ML ug/L ug/l cu ft/day cu ft/day cf/day cu ft/day 6/1/2025 7.32 7.26 25.50 <1.8 <1.80 159998.00 159998.00 20800.00 159998.00 6/2/2025 7.42 7.32 25.90 0.05 <1.8 <1.80 151992.00 151992.00 21200.00 151992.00 6/3/2025 7.05 7.26 25.40 <1.8 <1.80 158901.00 158901.00 21000.00 158901.00 6/4/2025 7.18 7.27 25.30 <1.8 <1.80 146269.00 146269.00 21000.00 146269.00 6/5/2025 7.34 7.30 25.30 <1.8 <1.80 <5.00 162502.00 162502.00 21800.00 162502.00 6/6/2025 7.44 7.26 25.40 <1.8 <1.80 157836.00 157836.00 19600.00 157836.00 6/7/2025 7.32 7.20 25.30 <1.8 <1.80 156186.00 156186.00 21500.00 156186.00 6/8/2025 7.30 7.30 25.40 <1.8 <1.80 153078.00 153078.00 5100.00 153078.00 6/9/2025 7.49 7.29 25.70 0.06 <1.8 <1.80 152110.00 152110.00 500.00 152110.00 6/10/2025 7.43 7.29 25.80 <1.8 <1.80 145645.00 145645.00 11900.00 145645.00 6/11/2025 7.34 7.27 25.90 <1.8 <1.80 154485.00 154485.00 20600.00 154485.00 6/12/2025 7.38 7.24 26.00 <1.8 <1.80 151488.00 151488.00 20900.00 151488.00 6/13/2025 6.88 7.26 26.00 <1.8 <1.80 157022.00 157022.00 21700.00 157022.00 6/14/2025 7.24 7.25 25.90 <1.8 <1.80 158962.00 158962.00 4900.00 158962.00 6/15/2025 7.10 7.25 26.30 <1.8 <1.80 141604.00 141604.00 500.00 141604.00 6/16/2025 7.20 7.28 26.50 <0.10 <1.8 <1.80 151198.00 151198.00 500.00 151198.00 6/17/2025 7.03 7.30 26.70 <1.8 <1.80 152513.00 152513.00 12000.00 152513.00 6/18/2025 6.74 7.25 26.60 <1.8 <1.80 161558.00 161558.00 16800.00 161558.00 6/19/2025 7.05 7.24 26.50 4.5 <1.80 156360.00 156360.00 18500.00 156360.00 6/20/2025 7.13 7.24 26.60 <1.8 <1.80 163454.00 163454.00 18200.00 163454.00 6/21/2025 7.39 7.29 26.30 <1.8 <1.80 145419.00 145419.00 700.00 145419.00 6/22/2025 7.39 7.33 26.00 <1.8 <1.80 136909.00 136909.00 1300.00 136909.00 6/23/2025 7.45 7.38 26.30 0.07 <1.8 <1.80 145172.00 145172.00 17000.00 145172.00 6/24/2025 7.27 7.36 26.30 <1.8 <1.80 147432.00 147432.00 21100.00 147432.00 6/25/2025 7.70 7.36 26.30 <1.8 <1.80 152676.00 152676.00 21700.00 152676.00 6/26/2025 7.13 7.39 26.60 <1.8 <1.80 152845.00 152845.00 21300.00 152845.00 6/27/2025 7.57 7.39 26.80 <1.8 <1.80 146585.00 146585.00 4600.00 146585.00 6/28/2025 7.43 7.30 26.70 <1.8 <1.80 157275.00 157275.00 700.00 157275.00 6/29/2025 6.88 7.30 26.80 <1.8 <1.80 146331.00 146331.00 1300.00 146331.00 6/30/2025 7.32 7.39 26.90 0.06 2.0 <1.80 151854.00 151854.00 400.00 151854.00 Minimum 6.74 7.20 25.30 0.05 <1.8 <1.80 <5.00 136909.00 136909.00 400.00 136909.00 Maximum 7.70 7.39 26.90 <0.10 4.5 <1.80 <5.00 163454.00 163454.00 21800.00 163454.00 Average 7.26 7.29 26.10 <0.07 <1.9 <1.80 <5.00 152522.00 152522.00 12970.00 152522.00 Rialto WRF\Influent Rialto WRF\Effluent Rialto WRF\Eff Rialto WRF\Effluent 113

Monthly Sewer Line Cleaned

114

115

RIALTO CIP

MONTHLY OPERATIONS
REPORT
Reporting Period:

June 2025
Prepared for: - Rialto Water Services
Prepared by: - Veolia Water West Operating Services
116

FIP-CIP Updates for July, 2025 1. Rialto Solids Upgrade Project: February 2025 - A meeting with Stakeholders to vet the GMP - to be set up by Peter Luchetti.

Veolia

drafting

a

FCWA

for

review/approval.

Veolia

and

Peter

Luchetti

are

trying

to

set

up

a

meeting

to

pick

up

the

project

before

the

GMP

expires. 4/08/2025 - GMP review was held 4/07/2025. This project is scheduled for the Rialto Utility Authority meeting in May and then City Council on June 6/10/2025. 7/8/2025-Updated GMP was provided to the city in June of 2025 with a validity period until August 27th, 2025 Currently awaiting

for

action

from

the

city..
8/13/2025 - City Council approved FCWA for construction on 8/12/2025, Veolia working with D/B team on subcontracting.

2. Digester 1 Activation: AECOM is reviewing the options proposed by DN Tanks and will include their recommendation and

cost

for

the

appropriate

cover

in

the

GMP

for

the

Solids

Handling

design.

This

work

will

be

completed

after

Solids

Handling

project

design

is

complete.

4/08/2025

-

Work

will

be

completed

after

solids

Handling

Project

Completion
7/7/2025-Project invoice with the City for approval/payment. 8/13/2025 - No change, awaiting invoice approval and payment. 3. Sycamore Sewer Trunk Line Project (Phase II): Design is complete and RFP documents sent to City (Tom) for review 8/15/23.

The

project

needs

to

be

completed

during

summer

as

it

passes

through

a

school

zone

and

in

order

to

get

Sycamore

Sewer

Lift

Station

back

online

fully.

4/08/2025

-

Funding

has

been

identified.

Veolia

and

the

City

of

Rialto

will

coordinate

next

steps

for

the

project.

7/9/2025-Project Initiation Memo has been completed and sent to the City for review. 8/13/2025 - No change. Project Initiation Memo has been completed and sent to the City for review. 4. Etiwanda Ave Water Improvement Project: Water line improvements from Riverside Ave to Eucalyptus Ave. The project is

in

design

and

will

have

a

design

review

once

ready.

4/08/2025

-

Funding

has

been

identified.

Veolia

and

the

City

of

Rialto

will

coordinate

next

steps

for

the

project.

7/9/2025-Project Initiation Memo has been completed and sent to the City for review. 8/13/2025 - No change. Project Initiation Memo has been completed and sent to the City for review. 5. A cacia Sewer Trunk Line Project (Phase III): Funding needs to be identified. Design will be completed after funding is identified.

7/7/2025-This

project

will

come

after

Sycamore

Phase

2 and

Etiwanda

Water

Improvements.

8/13/2025 - Project commencement after completion of Sycamore Phase 2 and Etiwanda water improvements. 6. City Well 3A (Phase 1): The first phase would include a pre/post video log of the well, bail and brush, a 60 hour development

test

that

includes

a

12hr

step

test

at

a

10 day

constant

pump

rate,

and

a

Dept.

of

Drinking

Water

required

Title

22 sampling

panel

with

the

addition

of

PFOA/PFAS

panel.

This

project

is

in

the

early

stage

and

a

FCWA

is

to

be

submitted

to

the

city

mid

March.

The

Veolia

team

are

finalizing

the

risk

assessment

and

FCWA

before

submitting

to

the

City.

4/08/2025

-

The

FCWA

for

phase

1 was

submitted

to

the

City

on

3/25/2025

for

approval.

The

City

agreed

to

move

forward

with

presenting

this

project

to

the

City

Council

and

on

April

22nd,

2025.

This

project

will

be

presented

to

the

council

for

approval

on

May

27th

as

it

did

not

make

the

April

calendar.
7/9/25: Video inspection of the well took place on 6/19/2025. 7/72025-The contractor began the bail and brush phase of the project. That is expected to take place from 7/7205 - 7/11/2025.

A

post

video

inspection

will

take

place

the

week

of

7/11/2025-to

check

the

efficiency

of

the

completed

bail

and

brush

process.

Pumping

operations

are

tentatively

scheduled

for

the

week

of

7/28/2025.

The

SB

County

Flood

Permit

is

still

pending.
8/13/2025 - Tri-county began mobilizing piping and pumping equipment on site 8/13/2025. Target date for sample results and

well

yield

expected

before

9/112/2025.

117

← All documents from this meeting