Cities Index.
Attachment 1 – Resolution.pdf

Richmond City Council
January 11, 2022

Document
Attachment 1 – Resolution.pdf
Meeting
January 11, 2022
Body
Richmond City Council
Pages
3
Original file
249 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Reso. No.

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ____

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TO ENTER INTO LEGAL SERVICES

AGREEMENTS WITH LAW FIRMS ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $350,000 PER FIRM, OVER THREE YEARS WITH AN OPTION TO

EXTEND THE AGREEMENTS FOR TWO YEARS WITH FUNDING TO BE

PROVIDED IN DEPARTMENT BUDGETS GOING FORWARD

WHEREAS, the Richmond City Attorney’s Office provides all legal services for the City of Richmond and City boards and commissions; and

WHEREAS, the Richmond City Attorney’s Office and other City departments, including the Community Development Department, City Manager’s Office and Port, anticipate needing legal services for both municipal law advice and to represent the City and other related entities in litigation; and

WHEREAS, the Richmond City Attorney’s Office seeks to hire a diverse group of qualified law firms and attorneys that will provide high-quality legal services and are dedicated to containing legal costs. In addition, the City Attorney’s Office wants to build ongoing relationships with firms that share our commitment to quality and to cost containment, as well as to expand and strengthen our relationships with Richmond-based firms, small firms and firms that are committed to equity and inclusion; and

WHEREAS, selection of outside counsel for all matters -- large and small-- is based on the quality of work, commitment to controlling costs, adherence to budgets and a demonstrated commitment to providing equal employment opportunities, equity and inclusion in its workforce; and
WHEREAS, in 2018, the City Attorney’s Office solicited a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for legal services and selected thirty-five (35) law firms to be retained on an as needed basis; and

WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, the Richmond City Attorney’s Office developed a more robust RFQ for municipal law legal services that sought more detailed responses from applicants to better inform the selection process; and

WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s Office also broadened the outreach to eligible law firms by reaching out to more than seventy-six law firms and organizations, including the Contra Costa County City Attorneys Bar Association, Charles Houston Bar Association, California Women Lawyers, Filipino Bar Association, Korean American Bar Association, San Francisco La Raza Association, South Asian Bar Association and West County Bar Association; and

WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s Office received forty-six (46) responses to the RFQ and all responses were reviewed by a panel of attorneys in the City Attorney’s Office; and

WHEREAS, the panel recommends the following forty-six (46) law firms to be used on an as needed, case-by-case basis:

 Aaronson, Dickerson, Cohn & Lanzone
 Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
 Allen Glaessner Hazelwood & Werth
LLP
 Armento and Hynes, LLP
 Atchison, Barisone & Condotti
 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud &
Romo
 Bassi Edlin Huie & Blum
 Best Best & Krieger LLP
 Boucher Law
 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC
 Downey Brand LLP
 Edrington Schirmer & Murphy LLP
 Ellis Investigations Law Corporation
 Fox Rothschild LLP
 Goldfarb & Lipman LLP
 Jarvis, Fay & Gibson, LLP
 Jones Mayer
 Kane, Ballmer & Berkman
 Kramer Workplace Investigations
 Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann &
Girard
 Lafayette & Kumagai LLP
 Law Offices of Bill Ford
 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
 Maloney Employment Law
 Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez &
Trester, LLP
Reso. No.

Page 2 of 3 ends

 McNamara Law Firm
 Meyers Nave
 Newdorf Legal
 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &
Stewart, P.C.
 Oppenheimer Investigations Group LLP
 Orbach Huff + Henderson
 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
 Remy Moose Manley LLP
 Renne Public Law Group
 Richards, Watson & Gershon
 Rimon Law
 Schiff Hardin LLP
 Shartsis Friese LLP
 Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
 Silver & Wright LLP
 Sloan Sakai Yeung & Wong LLP
 Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, A
Professional Corporation
 Telecom Law Firm PC
 The Sohagi Law Group, Plc
 Van Dermyden Makus Law Corporatio

WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s Office requests authority to enter into legal services agreements with each of the individual firms for an amount not-to-exceed $350,000, over a three-year period, from January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025 with an option to extend the agreements for two years; and

WHEREAS, this action does not terminate the existing legal services agreements that are currently in place on various projects and cases. Those agreements will continue and may be amended to allow work under the agreement to continue. Those agreements will not be terminated unless there is a good reason to terminate the agreement such as the end of the case or matter or if the work was not meeting the City’s goals; and

WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s Office is not requesting to fund each one of the legal services agreements at this time. The funding source will be budgeted in the applicable department’s budget; and

WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s Office will manage the legal services agreements, and each legal services agreement will be paid out of professional services accounts held by various City departments, including the Risk Management Division, City Attorney’s Office, Port, Richmond Housing Authority, Community Development Department and the City Manager’s Office; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Richmond hereby authorizes the City Attorney’s Office to enter into legal services agreements for legal services with the firms mentioned above, for an amount not to exceed $350,000 per firm, over a three and a half year period, from January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025, with an option to extend the agreements for two additional years.

*********************

I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held ______________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Reso. No.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Mayor

Approved as to form:

City Attorney

State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on ____, 2021.

Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond

← All documents from this meeting