Cities Index.
Attachment 1 - 20220118 PH3 Draft Maps.pdf

Richmond City Council
January 18, 2022

Document
Attachment 1 - 20220118 PH3 Draft Maps.pdf
Meeting
January 18, 2022
Body
Richmond City Council
Original file
2.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

City of Richmond
Redistricting Draft Maps
January 18, 2022 Shalice Tilton, Senior Consultant
National Demographics Corporation

2 Redistricting Process
2 Step Description
First Pre-Draft Hearing
July 6, 2021
• Held prior to release of draft maps.
• Educate and solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Second Pre-Draft Hearing
September 14, 2021
• Held prior to release of draft maps.
• Educate and solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Public Workshop
August 25, 2021: 2 & 6 p.m.
• Public workshops held to review redistricting process and introduction to mapping tools.

Public Workshop
December 6, 2021
• Public workshops held to review redistricting process and introduction to mapping tools.

First Draft Map Hearing
January 18, 2022
• Public Hearings to discuss, revise the draft maps; discuss the election sequence.

Second Draft Map Hearing
February 1, 2022
• Public Hearings to discuss the draft maps; discuss the election sequence; select a map
Map Adoption
By April 17, 2022
• Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. 3 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Minimize voters shifted to
different election years
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Future population growth
Preserving the core of
existing districts
Federal Laws California Criteria
for Cities

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Undivided neighborhoods and
“communities of interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of people
to get to a more distant group of
people)
Prohibited:
“Shall not favor or discriminate against a
political party.”
Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
3 Redistricting Rules and Goals
4 Demographic Summary of Existing Districts
Using official 2020 prisoner-adjusted Census population.

Each of the five Council districts must contain about 19,465 people. There should be no greater than a 10% deviation between the greatest populated district and the least populated district. The existing districts have a 14.66% overall deviation.

Using official 2020 prisoner-adjusted Census population.

Each of the five Council districts must contain about 19,465 people. There should be no greater than a 10% deviation between the greatest populated district and the least populated district. The existing districts have a 14.66% overall deviation.

5 Draft Maps Summary
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
Current 6 Y Y 14.66% 52.61% 33.27% 41.73% 27.34% D5 2; D6 2 101 6 Y N 21.38% N/A N/A N/A N/A D5 4
102 6 Y Y 9.98% 42.29% 42.65% 54.03% 26.86% D5 2; D6 2
103 6 N N 13.13% N/A N/A N/A N/A D5 2; D6 3
104 6 N* N* 10.40% 53.09% 32.44% 42.96% 27.00% D2 2; D3 3 105 6 N* Y 9.68% 53.09% 32.62% 42.90% 26.71% D2 2; D3 3 106 6+Unassign N N 11.49% N/A N/A N/A N/A D4 3
106b 6 Y Y 9.85% 46.49% 45.34% 49.28% 26.52% D4 3
107 6 N N 14.04% N/A N/A N/A N/A D4 3; D5 3
201 6 Y Y 7.37% 52.61% 33.27% 43.47% 27.61% D5 2; D6 2
202 6 Y Y 8.58% 52.61% 33.27% 43.47% 27.07% D5 2; D6 2
203 6 Y Y 6.41% 52.61% 45.95% 50.05% 26.86% D5 2
*Could easily be modified for balance. Maximum 53.09% 45.95% 54.03% 27.61% Minimum 42.29% 32.44% 42.90% 26.52%
City of Richmond - Draft Maps
6 Not Population Balanced or Not Contiguous

7 Deviation: 10.40%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs two in D3
Deviation: 10.40%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs two in D3
8 Deviation: 9.68%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs three in D3
Deviation: 9.68%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs three in D3
9 Deviation: 9.98%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Deviation: 9.98%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
10 Deviation: 9.85%
Pairs three in D4
Deviation: 9.85%
Pairs three in D4
11 Deviation: 7.37%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Deviation: 7.37%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
12 Deviation: 8.58%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Deviation: 8.58%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
13 Deviation: 6.41%
Pairs two in D5
Deviation: 6.41%
Pairs two in D5
14 Proposed Sequencing
14  Election Year 2022: Districts 2, 3, 4
 Election Year 2024: Districts 1, 5, 6
 After focus maps are identified, it is recommended the City Council review and, if needed, adjust the district number assignments.
15 Public Hearing & Discussion
15  Which map or map(s)
do you prefer?
 Goal is to identify 1-2
focus maps.
 Any revisions to those
maps?
Next Public Hearing:

February 1, 2022
 Which map or map(s)
do you prefer?
 Goal is to identify 1-2
focus maps.
 Any revisions to those
maps?
Next Public Hearing:

February 1, 2022

← All documents from this meeting