Cities Index.
Attachment 1 - Public Hearing PowerPoint PH4 Draft Maps 2-1-22 v2.pdf

Richmond City Council
February 1, 2022

Document
Attachment 1 - Public Hearing PowerPoint PH4 Draft Maps 2-1-22 v2.pdf
Meeting
February 1, 2022
Body
Richmond City Council
Original file
7.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

City of Richmond
Redistricting Draft Maps
February 1, 2022 Shalice Tilton, Senior Consultant
National Demographics Corporation

2 Redistricting Process
2 Step Description
First Pre-Draft Hearing
July 6, 2021
• Held prior to release of draft maps.
• Educate and solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Second Pre-Draft Hearing
September 14, 2021
• Held prior to release of draft maps.
• Educate and solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Public Workshop
August 25, 2021: 2 & 6 p.m.
• Public workshops held to review redistricting process and introduction to mapping tools.

Public Workshop
December 6, 2021
• Public workshops held to review redistricting process and introduction to mapping tools.

First Draft Map Hearing
January 18, 2022
• Public Hearings to discuss, revise the draft maps; discuss the election sequence.

Second Draft Map Hearing
February 1, 2022
• Public Hearings to discuss the draft maps; discuss the election sequence; select a map
Map Adoption
By April 17, 2022
• Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. 3 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Minimize voters shifted to
different election years
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Future population growth
Preserving the core of
existing districts
Federal Laws California Criteria
for Cities

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Undivided neighborhoods and
“communities of interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of people
to get to a more distant group of
people)
Prohibited:
“Shall not favor or discriminate against a
political party.”
Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
3 Redistricting Rules and Goals
4 Demographic Summary of Existing Districts
Using official 2020 prisoner-adjusted Census population.

Each of the six Council districts must contain about 19,465 people. There should be no greater than a 10% deviation between the greatest populated district and the least populated district.

The existing districts have a 14.66% overall deviation.

Using official 2020 prisoner-adjusted Census population.

Each of the six Council districts must contain about 19,465 people. There should be no greater than a 10% deviation between the greatest populated district and the least populated district.

The existing districts have a 14.66% overall deviation.

5 Draft Maps Summary

6 Not Population Balanced or Not Contiguous

7 Deviation: 10.40%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs two in D3
Deviation: 10.40%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs two in D3
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
104 6 N* N* 10.40% 53.09% 32.44% 42.96% 27.00% D2 2; D3 3 8 Deviation: 9.68%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs three in D3
Deviation: 9.68%
Not contiguous
Pairs two in D2
Pairs three in D3
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
105 6 N* Y 9.68% 53.09% 32.62% 42.90% 26.71% D2 2; D3 3 9 Deviation: 9.66%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Deviation: 9.66%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
102b 6 Y Y 9.66% 42.29% 42.65% 54.03% 26.86% D5 2; D6 2 10 Deviation: 9.85%
Pairs three in D4
Deviation: 9.85%
Pairs three in D4
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
106b 6 Y Y 9.85% 46.49% 45.34% 49.28% 26.52% D4 3
11 Deviation: 7.37%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Deviation: 7.37%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
201 6 Y Y 7.37% 52.61% 33.27% 43.47% 27.61% D5 2; D6 2
12 Deviation: 8.58%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Deviation: 8.58%
Pairs two in D5
Pairs two in D6
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
202 6 Y Y 8.58% 52.61% 33.27% 43.47% 27.07% D5 2; D6 2
13 Deviation: 6.41%
Pairs two in D5
Deviation: 6.41%
Pairs two in D5
Number # Districts Contiguous Pop Bal Deviation Max CVAP Latino
Max CVAP
NH White
Max CVAP
NH Black
Max CVAP
NH AAPI Pairs
203 6 Y Y 6.41% 52.61% 45.95% 50.05% 26.86% D5 2
14 View Map Details
Interactive Map Viewer
Link: https://arcg.is/0OiGKa
Date

15 View Draft Maps and Demographic Summaries at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/3849/District-Elections

16 Proposed Sequencing
16  Election Year 2022: Districts 2, 3, 4
 Election Year 2024: Districts 1, 5, 6
 After preferred map is identified, it is recommended the City Council review and, if needed, adjust the district number assignments.
17 Public Hearing & Discussion
17  Which map do you
prefer for adoption?
 Election Year 2022:

Districts 2, 3, 4
 Election Year 2024:

Districts 1, 5, 6
 Any revisions to
district number
assignments?
 Which map do you
prefer for adoption?
 Election Year 2022:

Districts 2, 3, 4
 Election Year 2024:

Districts 1, 5, 6
 Any revisions to
district number
assignments?
Interactive Review Map

← All documents from this meeting