Cities Index.
Written Public Comments Received 3-18-2022

Richmond City Council
March 18, 2022

Document
Written Public Comments Received 3-18-2022
Meeting
March 18, 2022
Body
Richmond City Council
Pages
2
Original file
311 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

From: Sabey, Andrew
To: City Clerk Dept User; [email protected]
Cc: Klein, Linda C.; Engler, Daniel M.

Subject: Letter Re City Council Consideration of CFD Resolution Date: Friday, March 18, 2022 4:49:41 PM
Attachments: comments to City Council 031822(14663000.1).pdf This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Dear Clerk
Please distribute to the Council.

Thank you.

Andrew B. Sabey
Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP
50 California Street | Suite 3200 | San Francisco, CA 94111 direct: 415.262.5103 | main: 415.262.5100
[email protected] | vcard | bio | website
For more information, visit our blog Lay of the Land
This communication is intended only for the exclusive use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the addressee, or someone responsible for delivering this document to the addressee, you may not read, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please call us promptly and securely dispose of it. Thank you.

www.coxcastle.com Los Angeles | Orange County | San Francisco Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP
50 California Street, Suite 3200
San Francisco, California 94111-4710
P: 415.262.5100 F: 415.262.5199
Andrew B. Sabey
415.262.5103
[email protected]

File No. 87029
March 18, 2022

VIA EMAIL
City Council
c/o Pamela Christian, City Clerk
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804

Re: Comments to the City Council regarding Resolution of Intent to form a Community Facilities District (CFD), Pt. Molate
Dear Mayer Butt and councilmembers:

Building on the commitments and terms negotiated in our Development Agreement with the City, Winehaven and City staffs have completed the underlying analysis and established the structure to form the CFD, which brings needed infrastructure, including much needed public safety infrastructure, to the Point Molate site. The Richmond City Council has already approved our Plan for the site which balances the need to deliver vitality and economic value, with the desire to preserve open space and environmental values on the site.

Several councilmembers have voiced concern about whether the CFD might negatively affect the City general fund. We have already agreed to “backstop” any CFD revenue shortages as needed to fund Bond payments (this is in addition to the $22.5 Million that the City derives from the sale of the site). As evidenced in the City staff’s report, your consultants and staff have already concluded that there are already adequate financial protections to insulate the City's General Fund from any possible CFD financing shortfalls.

Given the scheduling delays by the City to get us to this meeting today, any further delays in approving the Resolution of Intent will amount to a de facto breach of City’s commitments under the Development Agreement. The City’s breach threatens significant financial impacts to Winehaven and its financial partners who have invested thousands of hours and millions of dollars into the Project, which investments were based on the City honoring its commitments as agreed to in the DA and the DDA.

City and Winehaven staff and consultants have done a tremendous amount of professional work to get us to this point, and while some of you may have preferred a different City Council
March 18, 2022

Page 2 ends

development Plan, the current approved Plan does incorporate an abundance of open space, shoreline and park areas (over 70% of the site), habitat preservation and additional public spaces within the Historic District that this project will revitalize, provides much needed market and affordable housing, and is fiscally sound.

Historic buildings are crumbling, and lead and asbestos keeps the entire site closed to the public. We hope that give full weight to the reports your staff and consultants have provided, and that we can move forward together from this point forward,

Very truly yours,
Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP

Andrew B. Sabey

ABS:vm
cc David Aleshire, City Attorney
From: David Kafton
To: City Clerk Dept User
Cc: David Kafton
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEM L.1
Date: Friday, March 18, 2022 12:47:10 PM
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Dear Mayor & City Council Members,
Greetings!
I am a resident and real estate broker in Richmond.

I strongly urge you to vote No on Item L. 1, the intent to form a Community Financing District.

Three independent financial analyses have concluded the City of Richmond is highly likely to be liable for millions of dollars.

Thank you very much for your consideration of my request.

All the best,
David

David Kafton, Ph.D.

Owner/Real Estate Broker
Kafton Real Estate
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.kaftonrealestate.com
510.524.8973
From: Roberta Wyn CESP
To: City Clerk Dept User
Subject: Public Comments-- Agenda Item L.1. Adoption of A Resolution to Establish a Community Facilities District, Special Meeting March 18, 2022
Date: Friday, March 18, 2022 9:27:46 AM
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Dear Mayor Butt and Richmond City Councilmembers:

Citizens for East Shore Parks (CESP) is resubmitting the public comment below, which we originally submitted on March 15, 2022, since the agenda item on Adoption of Intent to Establish CFD will be heard March 18, 2022 as Agenda Item L.1. Thank you.

March 15, 2022
Mayor Thomas Butt and Richmond City Councilmembers
Richmond City Council
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond CA, 94804
Re: Agenda Item L.1. March 18, 2022. Special Meeting. Adoption of a Resolution of Intent to Establish a Community Facilities District (CFD) for Point Molate, Adoption of Goals & Policies Statement for Community Facilities Districts, specifically for the Point Molate CFD.

Dear Mayor Butt and Councilmembers Nate Bates, Claudia Jimenez, Demnlus Johnson, Eduardo Martinez, Gayle McLaughlin, Melvin Willis:

On the agenda is the adoption of the resolution of intent regarding the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the development project at Point Molate. It is our understanding that the developer is now asking for an authorized bond amount of up to $292 million. This is three times the allocation amount for the District in the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA).

Citizens for East Shore Parks (CESP), Sierra Club, Richmond residents, community experts, and other organizations had repeatedly warned the previous City Council that the numbers for this project show that it will end up burdening the City with costs not covered by the development and that the City and its residents would be burdened by the financial shortfall of this high risk project. Now the numbers have been revisited and the request for the developer is far greater and far riskier than ever discussed before. You are being asked to put the economic future of the City at risk. You will remember that the proponents of this development PROMISED THERE WOULD BE NO RISK to the City. Now the numbers show there will be millions of dollars of shortfall and the way the developer intends to paper over this is with unrealistic assumptions about sales prices, about the speed of the sales and about the size of the loan. The developer also will now tell you that the developer will stand behind the promises of no risk by pledging to cover the risk somehow or other. However this developer has no real assets or way to cover anything and if there is a debt the LLC will just go bankrupt as the SunCal LLCs have done in the past. That is the whole purpose of the LLC - to silo the exposure and bankrupt the LLC if there is a loss coming its way.

The goals of Richmond involve providing more equity to the community and providing housing that Richmond community can afford, along the transportation corridors. They do not involve exposing the community to supporting and subsidizing luxury housing enclaves for the wealthy with enormous infrastructure expenses, in a high severity fire zone, near a refinery, only accessible via a two-lane road.

It is time to act in the interests of Richmond, not the developer. There is no reason why the Council must agree to create a District or to authorize any amount, no less a $290 million bond amount (again three times higher than the allocation in the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA). It is your legal right under the DA and DDA to reject this CFD; it is within the sole discretion of the city. You could do it for no reason or any reason but here you must do it because approving this CFD will put the entire economic future of Richmond at risk, exposing the City to millions of dollars of losses per year and ravaging the general fund.

We concur with the January 25, 2022 sent to the City Council by Sierra Club, San Francisco Bay Chapter. If the current developer backs out of the project, the City can pursue alternatives for resolving the issues related to Point Molate and reach a solution that ends years of litigation, provides a true benefit to the community, eliminates the high risk financial gamble, and places development energy and resources where it is needed and necessary.

We urge you not to move forward with the formation of the CFD and bond indebtedness. No City Council should approve such financial indebtedness and risk.

Sincerely,
Shirley Dean
Shirley Dean
Board President, Citizens for East Shore Parks

Citizens for East Shore Parks
P.O. Box 6087
Albany, CA 94706
(510) 524 - 5000 (office)
(510) 526 - 3672 (fax)
www.eastshorepark.org
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter

Opt-in to receive shoreline updates and announcements from CESP.

← All documents from this meeting