From: Garret Murai <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:34 PM
To: James Atencio <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Richmond BTA Community Center Fire Damage Reconstruction Project
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
James:
A 3:30 p.m. email about staff making a recommendation to the City Council that the City terminate its construction contract with Angotti & Reilly at 4:00 pm?
I thought we were going to be discussing “next steps,” according to your email from August 12, 2022, not staff recommending termination of the construction contract? Further, why would staff say in its staff report that Angotti & Reilly “has not been responsive to the Contract requirements for Builder’s Risk Insurance,” when staff has confirmed on several occasions that Angotti & Reilly was not responsible for obtaining builder’s risk insurance, most recently by Yader Bermudez who sent an email to Angotti & Reilly stating that “Laura will follow up with a copy of the City’s Builder’s Risk Insurance”?
This feels like a double cross. Angotti & Reilly was asking about builder’s risk insurance to protect the City’s property and the materials and equipment used on the project, and didn’t want to risk not being able to get builder’s risk insurance (if the City has no builder’s risk coverage, as it appears it does not), by starting physical work on the project.
Please let me know why staff would do this.
Regards,
GDM
Garret D. Murai
Partner
Tel: 510.930.3300 | Fax: 510.930.3400
[email protected] | www.nomosllp.com
1970 Broadway, Suite 670 | Oakland CA 94612
NOMOS LLP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This electronic mail message and any attachments or links are intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message and any attachments or links is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this message or by telephone.
Thank you.
1 From: Michael C. H
uston <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 1:12 PM
To: Dave Aleshire <[email protected]>
Cc: Shannon Moore <[email protected]>
Subject: CalPERS matter) FW: PERS Letter
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Hi Dave,
I am forwarding this email from so you are in the l oop on the latest in CalPERS matter.
CalPERS has still not yet formally started the administrative appeal process, but they sent this correspondence to essentially stating that they will agree to resolve the dispute if pays back $ . They say that if does not accept this, they will seek $ and reinstatement from retirement. They gave until Oct. 8 to decide.
Shannon and I will be speaking with and attorney on Wed nesday a.m.
Michael
2