Richmond City Council
December 6, 2022

December 6, 2022
presented to the City Council once Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) is published.

Next Step

City staff are continuing to prepare for financial headwinds, which include but are not limited to rising inflation, significant interest rate increases, and real estate market corrections. During the last recession, the City of Richmond experienced significant property tax assessment reductions. As such, City staff recommend that the City Council begin preparing for potential property tax decreases. In addition, since the City of Richmond was incorporated in 1905, there are unprecedented built environment needs City-wide that require additional major investments (i.e., buildings, sidewalks, streets, lighting, and parks). Therefore, it is important that we remain strategic regarding spending and saving to ensure we can address essential current and future City needs.

City staff will continue to work on the Annual Audit and prepare an Annual Certified Financial Report (ACFR) and present to the City Council in January/February 2023.

City staff will also perform analysis around an adequate reserve level considering the risk factors shown below under the GFOA Fund Balance Guidelines for General Fund and bring back a recommendation for the City Council in the coming months. The risk factors are:
 The predictability of its revenues and the volatility of its expenditures  Its perceived exposure to significant one-time outlays (e.g., disasters, immediate capital needs, state budget cuts)
 The potential drain upon general fund resources from other funds, as well as the availability of resources in other funds
 The potential impact on the entity’s bond ratings and the corresponding increased cost of borrowed funds
 Commitments and assignments (i.e., governments may wish to maintain higher levels of unrestricted fund balance to compensate for any portion of unrestricted fund balance already committed or assigned by the government for a specific purpose).

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution

Reso. No.

RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1(b) of Article IV of the Richmond City Charter the City Manager is required to prepare an annual budget for the review and approval by the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the City’s budget was originally adopted on June 29, 2021, and the revised Mid-Year Budget was adopted on March 22, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City experienced economic changes since the budget was last adopted and needs to amend the budget to reflect these changes; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has approved Commitments and Assignments in the General Fund balance through resolutions 25-20, 78-21, and 126-21 to cover various expenditures; and

WHEREAS, the City experienced better than expected revenues and savings in the expenditures and the expenditures were covered from ongoing revenues; and

WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed year-end budget adjustments for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 and remaining balances on the fund balance assignments and commitments at a public meeting on November 22, 2022; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Richmond, California hereby adopts the resolution to approve the proposed option 1 as per the table 1 or option 2 as per the table 2

Table 1: Option 1: Negative Cash Clearing and Administrative Budget Adjustment Line Items as Listed.

REF ORG OBJECT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT COMMENTS
Negative Cash Balances
1 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 3,489,599 Negative cash due to deficit spending 2 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 2,654,027 Fund 4006 Stormwater-To payback advance from Risk Management Fund 3 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 104,908 Various payroll expenditures that were not directly charged to the employee's Department. Staff recommendation is to clear the balance from FY21-22 Operating Surplus4 01917090 Admin Building from RHA 307,650 RHA debt reduction for fair market value of the admin building per repayment agreement dated 1/25/2022
Total General Fund Negative Cash Clearing 6,556,184
General Fund Administrative Budget Adjustments
5 01191021 Operating Transfer In (24,629) JAG grant correction 6 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 8,089 Bond Admin Costs 7 01917090 Kids First Initiative 129,172 Balance to make for 1% of total General Fund revenue transferred to department of Children and Youth per Charter Article XV
Total General Fund Administrative112,632
Grand Total General Fund 6,668,816
Non-General Fund Administrative Budget Adjustments
8 13371018 Kids First Initiative (129,172) Balance to make for 1% of total General Fund Revenue transferred to department of Children and Youth per Charter Article XV
9 15131131 Operating Transfer In (3,489,599) To cover negative cash due to deficit spending 10 40623431 Operating Transfer In (2,654,027) From General Fund to payback advance from fund 5001 - Risk Management 11 40623431 Operating Transfer Out 2,654,027 Payback advance from fund 5001-Risk Management 12 30111090 Operating Transfer In (8,089) Bond Admin Costs 13 45141191 Transfer in from GF for Building (307,650) RHA Debt Reduction for fair market value of the admin building per Repayment Agreement dated 1/25/2022
14 65115090 Operating Transfer In 1,868,008 Reversal of mid-year budget adjustment 15 50182316 Operating Transfer In (2,654,027) From fund 4006-Stormwater for advance paid back 16 69990090 Operating Transfer In (104,908) Various payroll expenditures that were not directly charged to the employee's Department17 21033131 Impact Fee Admin Fee 117 Impact Fee Admin Fee 18 21136031 Impact Fee Admin Fee 8,232 Impact Fee Admin Fee 19 21301022 Impact Fee Admin Fee 946 Impact Fee Admin Fee 20 21491021 Impact Fee Admin Fee 4,691 Impact Fee Admin Fee 21 21551051 Impact Fee Admin Fee 506 Impact Fee Admin Fee 22 21633131 Impact Fee Admin Fee 2,263 Impact Fee Admin Fee 23 21741055 Impact Fee Admin Fee 1,364 Impact Fee Admin Fee 24 21923431 Impact Fee Admin Fee 3,593 Impact Fee Admin Fee 25 22022031 Impact Fee Admin Fee 6,087 Impact Fee Admin Fee 26 15063619 Impact Fee Admin Fee (27,799) Impact Fee Admin Fee Total Non-General Fund (4,825,437)

Reso. No.

Table 2: Option 2: Negative Cash Clearing and Administrative Budget Adjustment Line Items as Listed.

**********************

I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held November 22, 2022, by the following vote:

REF ORG OBJECT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT COMMENTS
Negative Cash Balances
1 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 1,163,200 Negative cash due to deficit spending 2 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 956,375 Fund 4006 Stormwater-To payback advance from Risk Management Fund 3 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 104,908 Various payroll expenditures that were not directly charged to the employee's Department. Staff recommendation is to clear the balance from FY21-22 Operating Surplus 4 01917090 Admin Building from RHA 307,650 RHA debt reduction for fair market value of the admin building per repayment agreement dated 1/25/2022
5 OPEB Trust 1,940,874 Additional operating surplus to OPEB trust Total General Fund Negative Cash Clearing 4,473,006
General Fund Administrative Budget Adjustments
6 01191021 Operating Transfer In (24,629) JAG grant correction 7 01917090 Operating Transfer Out 8,089 Bond Admin Costs 8 01917090 Kids First Initiative 129,172 Balance to make for 1% of total General Fund revenue transferred to department of Children and Youth per Charter Article XV
Total General Fund Administrative 112,632
Grand Total General Fund 4,585,638
Non-General Fund Administrative Budget Adjustments
9 13371018 Kids First Initiative (129,172) Balance to make for 1% of total General Fund Revenue transferred to department of Children and Youth per Charter Article XV
10 15131131 Operating Transfer In (1,163,200) To cover negative cash due to deficit spending 11 40623431 Operating Transfer In (956,375) From General Fund to payback advance from fund 5001 - Risk Management 12 40623431 Operating Transfer Out 956,375 Payback advance from fund 5001-Risk Management 13 30111090 Operating Transfer In (8,089) Bond Admin Costs 14 45141191 Transfer in from GF for
Building
(307,650) RHA Debt Reduction for fair market value of the admin building per Repayment Agreement dated 1/25/2022
15 65115090 Operating Transfer In 1,868,008 Reversal of mid-year budget adjustment 16 50182316 Operating Transfer In 956,375 From fund 4006-Stormwater for advance paid back 17 69990090 Operating Transfer In (104,908) Various payroll expenditures that were not directly charged to the employee's Department 18 21033131 Impact Fee Admin Fee 117 Impact Fee Admin Fee 19 21136031 Impact Fee Admin Fee 8,232 Impact Fee Admin Fee 20 21301022 Impact Fee Admin Fee 946 Impact Fee Admin Fee 21 21491021 Impact Fee Admin Fee 4,691 Impact Fee Admin Fee 22 21551051 Impact Fee Admin Fee 506 Impact Fee Admin Fee 23 21633131 Impact Fee Admin Fee 2,263 Impact Fee Admin Fee 24 21741055 Impact Fee Admin Fee 1,364 Impact Fee Admin Fee 25 21923431 Impact Fee Admin Fee 3,593 Impact Fee Admin Fee 26 22022031 Impact Fee Admin Fee 6,087 Impact Fee Admin Fee 27 15063619 Impact Fee Admin Fee (27,799) Impact Fee Admin Fee Total Non-General Fund 1,111,363

November 22, 2022

Finance Department

DATE: December 6, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM:

Shasa Curl, City Manager,
Nickie Mastay, Deputy City Manager
Delmy Cuellar, Director of Finance
Mubeen Qader, Budget Administrator
Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
SUBJECT:

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Quarter 1 Budget Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact is an increase in net budget appropriation of $447,486 in Non-General Funds.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

June 21, 2022

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City staff is presenting the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022- 2023 Quarter 1 General Fund budget to actuals report,
All Funds budget to actuals report, and the Capital
Improvement budget to actuals report. The purpose of
this report is to monitor revenues and expenditures, as compared to the approved budgeted amounts.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

RECEIVE the FY 2022-23 Quarter 1 Budget Report for
the period of July 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022; and APPROVE proposed budget adjustments – Finance
(Shasa Curl/Nickie Mastay/Delmy Cuellar 620-6790).

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of the Quarter 1 Budget Report is to assist the City in monitoring its revenue and expenditures, as compared to the approved budgeted amounts. The report also provides the City Council, staff, and the community the ability to monitor trends that impact the budget cycle.

AGENDA
REPORT

November 22, 2022
This report represents an overview of the City’s first quarter operating revenues and expenditures for FY 2022-23. The period covers budget activity from July 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022. The threshold for the first three months of the fiscal year is 25 percent, meaning that it is expected that 25 percent of the adopted budget will have been expended. Revenues are not necessarily measured against the same standard due to the seasonality of some major revenue sources, such as property taxes, which are received in December, April, and June each of year.

General Fund

General Fund Revenues
Overall, revenue received totaled $41.9 million (20.3 percent of budget) for the first quarter of FY 2022-23. This is below the threshold of 25 percent, but the variance is primarily due to the seasonality of some revenue sources. For example, the City does not receive its first property tax installment (55 percent) until the end of December.

Table 1 below summarizes the first quarter revenue budget to actuals. See Attachment 1 for the breakdown by department.

Table 1: General Fund Revenue, FY2022-23, Quarter 1

For most General Fund revenues, it is still too early to tell if adjustments will be needed.

By mid-year, the City staff will have a better understanding of the local trends. From the data points we have received thus far in FY 2022-23, most revenues are trending as expected or better.

 Property Tax -- For the FY 2022-23 General Fund property taxes, staff estimated growth of 2.9 percent for Secured Property Taxes and overall growth for this revenue category of 1.8 percent. The County released 2022-2023 Assessment FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
0001-General Fund
PROPERTY TAXES (46,056,962) (46,056,962) - - (46,056,962) 0% 0% SALES & USE TAX (55,282,200) (55,282,200) (2,464,665) - (52,817,535) 4% 4% UTILITY USERS TAX (49,963,589) (49,963,589) (17,672,407) - (32,291,182) 35% 35% OTHER TAXES (21,638,449) (21,638,449) (2,278,697) - (19,359,752) 11% 11% LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (11,129,402) (11,129,402) (1,940,532) - (9,188,870) 17% 17% FINES & FORFEITURES (475,275) (475,275) (10,304) - (464,971) 2% 2% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (236,079) (236,079) - - (236,079) 0% 0% CHARGES FOR SERVICES (3,571,292) (3,571,292) (586,021) - (2,985,271) 16% 16% OTHER REVENUE (187,500) (187,500) (67,048) - (120,452) 36% 36% RENTAL INCOME (874,506) (874,506) (233,227) - (641,280) 27% 27% INTERGOV STATE TAXES (125,000) (125,000) - - (125,000) 0% 0% INTERGOV STATE GRANT (175,000) (175,000) - - (175,000) 0% 0% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (253,569) (263,569) (119,209) - (144,360) 45% 45% PROC FR SLE PROP (100,000) (100,000) - - (100,000) 0% 0% OPER XFERS IN (16,563,424) (16,563,424) (16,498,336) - (65,088) 100% 100% Total Revenue (206,632,248) (206,642,248) (41,870,445) - (164,771,802) 20% 20%

November 22, 2022
Roll in July 2022 which indicated growth of the Assessed Valuation (AV) at 8.15 percent for Secured Property Taxes. This is the main component in changes to secure property taxes year to year. Other significant impacts include sale of properties and tax increment allocation. If the 8.15 percent AV increases hold, that would translate to additional revenue of close to $2.9 million above what was budgeted. The City staff will have a clearer understanding of actual property tax revenues after the City receives the December payment from the Contra Costa County.

 Sales & Use Tax -- The sales tax revenue stream, post COVID’s shelter–in-place and the associated downturn in the economy, has significantly increased over the last two years and the trend is expected to continue through the current fiscal year. The updated forecast from the City’s financial consultants and the internal forecast tie to what is currently budgeted for FY 2022-23.

 Utility Users Tax (UUT) --This revenue stream, including the maximum cap amount paid by Chevron, has been received as expected. The cap amount was expected to grow by 13.1 percent and ended up being 13.12 percent. Like the other major revenue streams, the year-to-date amounts for UUT currently align with budgeted amounts.

 Other Taxes -- Other revenues of note include the documentary transfer tax which is collected by the County on the sale of properties. The City has received the July, August and September payment totaling $2.1 million (16 percent of budget). Of the major revenue streams, this is the most volatile and hardest to predict with month to month varying significantly and a sale or two having huge impacts on the tax amount. It is too early to tell if an adjustment will be needed at mid-year, but, as stipulated in the Guiding Fiscal Policy document, the budgeted amount will be recalculated in January by calculating the mean monthly amount collected since the increase to the rate was approved by voters in 2018.

 Licenses, Permits, & Fees – This revenue stream includes the business tax revenue. Through September 2022, the full revenue is at 17 percent of the budgeted amount. Comparing first quarter of FY2021-22 with the first Quarter of FY2022-23, there is an increase of nearly $1 million. The increase stems from the collection of business tax after the adoption of Measure U. The City is being sued and it is difficult to estimate the impact of this pending litigation with the revenue stream.

General Fund Expenditures
General Fund expenditures totaled $37.5 million (22 percent of budget) for the first quarter of FY 2022-23. Actuals are trending lower than the approved budgeted amounts. The variances around the 22 percent threshold are mostly due to purchase order encumbrances, which are funds earmarked for specific operating expenditures, such as copier leases. Table 2 below summarizes the first quarter expenditure budget to actuals. See Attachment 1 for the breakdown by department.

November 22, 2022
Table 2: General Fund Expenditure, FY2022-23, Quarter 1

 Salaries & Wages – includes base salaries for full-time and part-time staff, overtime, and other pay types. Actual expenditures total $16 million (21 percent of budget). This category is lower than the threshold primarily due to vacant positions.

 Benefits –includes medical, dental, workers compensation, CalPERS pension costs, other post-employment benefits (OPEB), and other benefits. Actual expenditures total $14.7 million (22 percent of budget) is below the threshold due to vacant positions.

 Professional & Admin Services – includes professional and consulting services, and contractual obligations, such as animal control services. Actual expenditures total $1.7 million (10 percent of budget) and are below the threshold. Factoring in purchase order encumbrances of $3.8 million, the total is $5.6 million (32 percent of budget).

Operating savings are typically captured in this category.

 Other Operating – includes copier leases, office s upplies, and other items. Actual expenditures total $1.2 million (15 percent of budget). Factoring in purchase order encumbrances of $1.7 million, the total is $2.9 million (37 percent of budget).

 Utilities – includes gas, electricity, water, refuse, tele phone, and internet services.

Actual expenditures total $822 thousands (15 percent of budget). Factoring in purchase order encumbrances of $900 thousands, the total is $1.7 million (37 percent of budget).

 Equipment & Contract Services - includes equipment and maintenance/repair services. Actual expenditures total $842 thousands (31 percent of budget). Factoring in purchase order encumbrances of $552 thousands, the total is $1.3 million (31 percent of budget).

FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
0001-General Fund
SALARIES AND WAGES 78,761,868 78,549,213 16,158,437 - 62,390,776 21% 21% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 66,929,804 66,887,328 14,746,497 - 52,140,831 22% 22% PROF & ADMIN 16,977,138 17,173,006 1,771,014 3,780,379 11,621,613 10% 32% OTHER OPERATING 7,970,902 7,987,130 1,195,630 1,738,687 5,052,813 15% 37% UTILITIES 5,399,957 5,397,722 821,829 900,421 3,675,473 15% 32% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 2,731,448 2,714,957 842,428 551,802 1,320,727 31% 51% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 25,725 29,641 3,770 24,871 1,000 13% 97% COST POOL 15,277,766 15,277,766 - - 15,277,766 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,172,136 3,455,211 133,172 71,242 3,250,798 4% 6% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 1,037,009 1,037,009 118,080 - 918,929 11% 11% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (3,531,610) (3,531,610) - - (3,531,610) 0% 0% GRANT EXPENDITURES 2,500 82,500 - 8,000 74,500 0% 10% OPER XFERS OUT 11,877,605 11,877,605 1,718,722 - 10,158,883 14% 14% Total Expenditures 206,632,248 206,937,477 37,509,577 7,075,400 162,352,499 18% 22%

November 22, 2022

 Transfers Out – includes transfers out from the General Fund to non -General Funds mostly for operating subsidies and a portion of debt service. Actuals total $1.7 million (14 percent of budget).

Non-General Funds

Non-General Fund Revenues
Overall, 13 percent of non -general fund revenues have been collected and are trending as expected. The timing of receipts vary amongst the funds based on the source of funding. For instance, grant funds are typically received after expenditures are incurred and reimbursement requests are submitted to grantors. The chart below summarizes the revenue budget to actuals for non -general funds. See Attachment 2 for revenue budget to actuals by individual fund.

Chart 1: Non-General Fund Revenues, FY 2022-23, Quarter 1 Actual vs. Budget

Non-General Fund Expenditures
Overall, 19 percent of non -general fund budget appropriations have been expended.

Spending patterns in other funds are like those in the General Fund and trending as expected. Most of the actual expenditures are either at o r below the threshold of 25

November 22, 2022
percent. Amounts over the threshold are primarily due to purchase order encumbrances.

The chart below summarizes the expenditure budget to actuals for non -general funds.

See Attachment 2 for expenditure budget to actuals by individual fund.

Chart 2:Non-General Fund Expenditures, FY2022-23 Quarter 1 Actual vs. Budget

Capital Improvement Project Highlights
The Capital Improvement Project budget total is $114.9 million which consists of $40 million of special project funding and $74.9 million of funding from Enterprise funds, Internal Services, or other funds. $35.9 million of the total includes project funding that was carried-forward from the prior year. Overall, 5 percent of capital project fund budget appropriations have been expended. Spending patterns may seem low due to several projects still under design phase. Expenditures will pick up quickly once the projects move into construction. The table below shows major project highlights, See Attachment 3 for Capital Improvement Project Quarter 1 expenditure budget to actuals for details.

November 22, 2022
Table 3: Capital Improvement Projects Highlights

Quarter 1 Budget Adjustments:

City staff propose budget adjustments net of $447,486 as mentioned below and set forth in the Resolution (Attachment 4):

 American Rescue Plan Act – City staff is proposing to appropriate $296,300 for the Environmental Planning. The project was appropriated in the FY2021-22 budget; however, the appropriation was inadvertently not included in the FY2022-23 budget that was approved on June 21, 2022.
 American Rescue Plan Act – City staff is proposing to appropriate $1,000,000 for the Community Beautification Project. The project was appropriated in the FY2021-22 budget; however, the appropriation was inadvertently not included in the FY2022-23 budget that was approved on June 21, 2022.
 American Rescue Plan Act – City staff is proposing to appropriate $150,000 for MLK Turf Field. The project was appropriated in the FY2021-22 budget; however, the appropriation was inadvertently not included in the FY2022-23 budget that was approved on June 21, 2022.
 Wastewater Fund 4003 – City staff is requesting to remove the Flood Risk Reduction Rheem Creek grant budget of ($1,598,844). The Grant is already budgeted in the Stromwater fund and this appropriation is redundant.
 Measure J – the revenue exceeded by $600,000 than the original budget, the City staff is proposing to appropriate the additional monies to the Street Paving Program.

Labor Negotiations and Looming Recession:

The City is in the middle of labor negotiations with several bargaining units regarding labor contracts and the implementation of the Classification and Compensation study.

The results of the negotiations will impact the expenditure trends in the next three quarters. The global economy is also indicating early signs of recession in the calendar Budget Actual
Castro Ranch Road – this project is at end of planting landscaping establishment and is expected to be completed by end of this fiscal year 1,070,682$ 483$ Grit and Aeration Replacement – this project is funded by the State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan and is under top priority order of the Baykeeper Settlement agreement to rehabilitate the Wastewater Treatment Plant 37,139,075$ 1,413,954$ Richmond Parkway – this funding covered the worse paving locations along the corridor 1,000,000$
Street Paving - the annual program is underway and is an ongoing effort 2,456,167$ 466,085$ Yellow Brick Road – this project will be complete once Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) service connections are met 1,904,636$ 340,070$ CIP - Highlights 43,570,560$ 2,220,592$

November 22, 2022
year of 2023. Due to these pressures on the City’s expenditures and revenues, there is a great deal of potential for fiscal headwinds in the coming years that could deplete the City’s reserves.

Next Steps
City staff will continue to closely monitor the revenues and expenditure trends in the current fiscal year to determine if adjustments will need to be made during the mid-year budget review.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – General Fund – Quarter 1 Budget Report
Attachment 2 – All Funds – Quarter 1 Budget Report
Attachment 3 – Capital Improvement Projects Quarter 1 Report Attachment 4 – Resolution
Attachment 5 – Presentation

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
10-MAYOR
SALARIES AND WAGES 290,056 290,056 65,599 - 224,457 23% 23% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 255,823 255,823 68,687 - 187,136 27% 27% Health insurance and retirement benefits slightly higher than budget PROF & ADMIN 16,100 16,100 - - 16,100 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 2,400 2,400 199 - 2,202 8% 8% UTILITIES 1,250 1,250 1,389 - (139) 111% 111% Administrative adjustment, budget transfer will be processed to cover Verizon cellphone service
COST POOL 19,191 19,191 - - 19,191 0% 0% Total Expenditures 584,820 584,820 135,875 - 448,945 23% 23% 11-CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES 298,872 293,872 58,322 - 235,550 20% 20% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 217,790 217,790 60,382 - 157,408 28% 28% Health insurance and retirement benefits higher than budget PROF & ADMIN 39,550 44,588 2,875 - 41,713 6% 6% OTHER OPERATING 18,600 18,297 1,211 2,285 14,801 7% 19% UTILITIES 1,100 1,365 70 - 1,295 5% 5% COST POOL 31,943 31,943 - - 31,943 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,200 1,200 - - 1,200 0% 0% Total Expenditures 609,055 609,055 122,860 2,285 483,909 20% 21% 12-COMMISSIONS
SALARIES AND WAGES 77,000 72,000 2,874 - 69,126 4% 4% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 447 - (447) 100% 100% Administrative adjustment, budget transfer will be processed to cover benefits for part time staff
PROF & ADMIN 10,300 15,300 500 - 14,800 3% 3% OTHER OPERATING 1,050 1,050 - - 1,050 0% 0% Total Expenditures 88,350 88,350 3,821 - 84,529 4% 4% 13-CITY MANAGER
SALARIES AND WAGES 469,443 469,443 101,927 - 367,516 22% 22% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 252,744 252,744 48,007 - 204,737 19% 19% PROF & ADMIN 124,750 124,750 813 135 123,802 1% 1% OTHER OPERATING 9,200 9,200 1,394 1,373 6,432 15% 30% PO encumbered with Ricoh for copier lease
UTILITIES - - 109 - (109) 100% 100% Administrative adjustment, budget transfer will be processed to cover Verizon cellphone service
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 200 200 - 200 - 0% 100% PO encumbered with Shred Defense for miscellaneous services COST POOL 105,040 105,040 - - 105,040 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (180,453) (180,453) - - (180,453) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 780,924 780,924 152,250 1,709 626,965 19% 20%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
14-CITY CLERK
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (600) (600) - - (600) 0% 0% Permit fee revenue is unpredictable CHARGES FOR SERVICES (3,000) (3,000) - - (3,000) 0% 0% Passport revenue is unpredictable, will review at mid-year to determine if adjustment is needed
Total Revenue (3,600) (3,600) - - (3,600) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 450,250 450,250 110,898 - 339,352 25% 25% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 279,190 279,190 76,814 - 202,376 28% 28% Workers comp, OPEB, and retirement benefits are slightly higher than anticipated
14-CITY CLERK - continued
PROF & ADMIN 334,100 334,100 (4,730) 22,580 316,250 -1% 5% OTHER OPERATING 20,300 20,300 1,005 2,659 16,637 5% 18% UTILITIES - - 70 - (70) 100% 100% Administrative adjustment, budget transfer will be processed to cover the IPAD data plan
COST POOL 22,250 22,250 - - 22,250 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (70,463) (70,463) - - (70,463) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 1,035,627 1,035,627 184,058 25,239 826,331 18% 20% 15-CITY ATTORNEY
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,485,029 1,485,029 222,002 - 1,263,027 15% 15% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 725,294 725,294 108,394 - 616,900 15% 15% PROF & ADMIN 2,101,435 2,378,316 4,650 287,607 2,086,058 0% 12% OTHER OPERATING 24,750 24,750 1,532 17,000 6,218 6% 75% PO encumbered with Ricoh for rental services
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 4,075 4,075 - 277 3,798 0% 7% COST POOL 79,950 79,950 - - 79,950 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (319,088) (319,088) - - (319,088) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 4,101,445 4,378,326 336,578 304,884 3,736,863 8% 15% 16-PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES (CODE ENFORCEMENT)
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (955,500) (955,500) (107,979) - (847,521) 11% 11% Permit fee revenue is unpredictable
OTHER REVENUE (30,000) (30,000) (36,013) - 6,013 - 120% Total Revenue (985,500) (985,500) (143,993) - (841,507) 15% 15% SALARIES AND WAGES 798,887 798,887 174,626 - 624,261 22% 22% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 645,462 645,462 146,130 - 499,332 23% 23% PROF & ADMIN 373,400 373,400 4,288 5,400 363,712 1% 3% OTHER OPERATING 28,947 28,947 1,775 5,228 21,944 6% 24% UTILITIES 11,500 11,500 - - 11,500 0% 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 13,549 13,549 1,135 - 12,414 8% 8% Total Expenditures 1,871,745 1,871,745 327,954 10,628 1,533,163 18% 18%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
17-FINANCE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (17,000) (17,000) - - (17,000) 0% 0% Permit fee revenue is unpredictable Total Revenue (17,000) (17,000) - - (17,000) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,733,520 2,733,520 616,357 - 2,117,163 23% 23% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 2,155,114 2,155,114 437,545 - 1,717,569 20% 20% PROF & ADMIN 837,722 837,722 11,886 220,253 605,583 1% 28% PO's encumbered for audit, courier, and temporary staffing services OTHER OPERATING 65,806 65,806 5,423 21,883 38,500 8% 41% PO encumbered with Ricoh for annual copier lease services UTILITIES 1,400 1,400 180 - 1,220 13% 13% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 435 435 - 270 165 0% 62% PO encumbered for shredding services COST POOL 179,722 179,722 - - 179,722 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (1,152,435) (1,152,435) - - (1,152,435) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 4,821,284 4,821,284 1,071,392 242,406 3,507,486 22% 27% 18-HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,004,427 1,004,427 196,114 - 808,313 20% 20% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 611,438 611,438 138,395 - 473,043 23% 23% PROF & ADMIN 706,200 706,200 24,994 271,030 410,175 4% 42% Includes some new expenditures for The Segal Company and CAL- Pacific Court Reporting. Will need mid-year adjustment
OTHER OPERATING 21,625 21,625 2,619 8,990 10,016 12% 54% PO encumbered with Ricoh for annual copier lease services COST POOL 107,789 107,789 - - 107,789 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (184,290) (184,290) - - (184,290) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 2,267,339 2,267,339 362,123 280,171 1,625,046 16% 28% 19-POLICE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (90,500) (90,500) (26,199) - (64,301) 29% 29% FINES & FORFEITURES (150,000) (150,000) 32,235 - (182,235) -21% -21% Duplicate payment to T2 Systems Inc., refund processed
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (1,102,500) (1,102,500) (212,813) - (889,687) 19% 19% Revenue is not received equally monthly OTHER REVENUE (82,000) (82,000) (925) - (81,075) 1% 1% Revenue is not received equally monthly INTERGOV STATE GRANT (10,000) (10,000) - - (10,000) 0% 0% Reimbursements are completed after expenses occur INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (250,000) (250,000) (119,209) - (130,791) 48% 48% Total Revenue (1,685,000) (1,685,000) (326,911) - (1,358,089) 19% 19%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
SALARIES AND WAGES 32,201,099 32,201,099 6,299,842 - 25,901,257 20% 20% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 28,524,847 28,524,847 5,658,568 - 22,866,280 20% 20% PROF & ADMIN 4,362,874 4,148,664 959,700 1,153,845 2,035,119 23% 51% PO encumbered for RPAL Youth Services and Tactical K9 Training Services
OTHER OPERATING 2,503,881 2,514,616 675,498 478,659 1,360,458 27% 46% PO encumbered for some of building lease contract with DICON UTILITIES 400,000 400,000 28,182 315,143 56,675 7% 86% PO encumbered for Verizon, Pacific Bell, & T-Mobile phone services EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 662,996 512,355 38,578 60,367 413,410 8% 19% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 1,725 5,200 - 5,200 - 0% 100% PO encumbered for annual insurance premium for Drone COST POOL 3,269,974 3,269,974 - - 3,269,974 0% 0% 19-POLICE - Continued
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 325,306 668,306 8,340 - 659,966 1% 1% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 206,031 206,031 118,080 - 87,950 57% 57% Paid majority of debt service for the year Total Expenditures 72,458,732 72,451,091 13,786,788 2,013,215 56,651,089 19% 22% 20-FIRE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (925,000) (925,000) (141,283) - (783,717) 15% 15% Revenue is not received equally monthly CHARGES FOR SERVICES (870,503) (870,503) (135,866) - (734,637) 16% 16% Revenue is not received equally monthly Total Revenue (1,795,503) (1,795,503) (277,149) - (1,518,354) 15% 15% SALARIES AND WAGES 18,574,259 18,574,259 4,404,981 - 14,169,278 24% 24% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 14,824,371 14,824,371 3,346,691 - 11,477,680 23% 23% PROF & ADMIN 1,376,815 1,376,815 15,122 110,570 1,251,123 1% 9% OTHER OPERATING 250,294 250,294 10,474 - 239,820 4% 4% UTILITIES 33,500 33,500 3,817 - 29,683 11% 11% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 136,850 136,850 2,914 16,600 117,336 2% 14% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 23,000 23,441 3,770 19,671 - 16% 100% PO encumbered for Fire apparatus insurance COST POOL 1,214,448 1,214,448 - - 1,214,448 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,500 25,059 3,977 - 21,082 16% 16% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 114,613 114,613 - - 114,613 0% 0% OPER XFERS OUT 326,018 326,018 81,506 - 244,512 25% 25% Total Expenditures 36,899,668 36,899,668 7,873,253 146,841 28,879,574 21% 22% 21-OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,341,638 1,341,638 181,158 - 1,160,480 14% 14% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,153,168 1,153,168 142,210 - 1,010,958 12% 12% PROF & ADMIN 756,090 756,090 - - 756,090 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 109,640 109,640 395 4,292 104,953 0% 4% UTILITIES 66,000 66,000 1,865 - 64,135 3% 3% COST POOL 507,111 507,111 - - 507,111 0% 0% 21-OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY - Continued

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 746 - (746) 100% 100% Purchased computer hardware from Verizon Wireless; a budget transfer will be completed to cover the expense
Total Expenditures 3,933,647 3,933,647 326,374 4,292 3,602,980 8% 8% 23-PUBLIC WORKS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (131,100) (131,100) (4,694) - (126,406) 4% 4% Fee revenue is unpredictable FINES & FORFEITURES - - - - - - - Revenue is not received equally monthly USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - - - - Revenue is not received equally monthly CHARGES FOR SERVICES (1,463,289) (1,463,289) (237,338) - (1,225,951) 16% 16% Revenue is not received equally monthly OTHER REVENUE - - (1,572) - 1,572 100% 100% RENTAL INCOME (18,000) (18,000) (4,304) - (13,696) 24% 24% PROC FR SLE PROP (100,000) (100,000) - - (100,000) 0% 0% Sell of property is unpredictable Total Revenue (1,712,389) (1,712,389) (247,908) - (1,464,481) 14% 14%

SALARIES AND WAGES 9,824,095 9,621,739 2,055,217 - 7,566,522 21% 21% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 7,919,295 7,919,295 1,750,048 - 6,169,247 22% 22% PROF & ADMIN 1,138,095 1,430,197 104,657 698,670 626,870 7% 56% Multiple PO's encumbered for work citywide OTHER OPERATING 2,067,607 2,038,850 422,725 1,006,550 609,575 21% 70% Multiple PO's encumbered for work citywide UTILITIES 4,128,266 4,128,266 764,201 559,315 2,804,750 19% 32% Multiple PO's encumbered for work citywide EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,032,400 1,057,400 116,010 432,615 508,775 11% 52% Multiple PO's encumbered for work citywide COST POOL 4,429,831 4,429,831 - - 4,429,831 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 10,000 30,000 757 - 29,243 3% 3% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 716,365 716,365 - - 716,365 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (647,398) (647,398) - - (647,398) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 30,618,556 30,724,545 5,213,615 2,697,150 22,813,780 17% 26% 24-LIBRARY & CULTURAL SERVICES
RENTAL INCOME - - (7,509) - 7,509 100% 100% Total Revenue - (10,000) (7,509) - (2,491) 75% 75% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,438,588 2,438,588 529,200 - 1,909,387 22% 22% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 2,002,202 2,002,202 424,750 - 1,577,452 21% 21% PROF & ADMIN 625,389 635,389 153,911 99,060 382,418 24% 40% Purchased computer software from Innovative Interfaces Inc.

OTHER OPERATING 66,050 66,050 9,153 35,830 21,066 14% 68% UTILITIES 8,000 8,000 693 - 7,307 9% 9% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 2,136 2,136 - 400 1,736 0% 19% COST POOL 258,762 258,762 - - 258,762 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 12,700 12,700 - - 12,700 0% 0% Total Expenditures 5,413,827 5,423,827 1,117,708 135,290 4,170,829 21% 23%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
25-COMMUNITY SERVICES
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (781,808) (781,808) (180,744) - (601,064) 23% 23% OTHER REVENUE (15,500) (15,500) (11,216) - (4,284) 72% 72% RENTAL INCOME (525,567) (525,567) (158,117) - (367,450) 30% 30% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (3,569) (3,569) - - (3,569) 0% 0% Reimbursements are completed after expenses occur Total Revenue (1,326,445) (1,326,445) (350,077) - (976,368) 26% 26%

SALARIES AND WAGES 2,614,550 2,614,252 662,745 - 1,951,507 25% 25% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 2,081,914 2,039,438 550,060 - 1,489,378 27% 27% PROF & ADMIN 507,319 428,375 83,214 22,279 322,882 19% 25% OTHER OPERATING 28,541 83,093 1,501 10,676 70,916 2% 15% UTILITIES 55,520 53,020 2,334 7,349 43,338 4% 18% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 10,500 9,250 329 4,955 3,966 4% 57% PO encumbered for contract to maintain fitness equipment COST POOL 592,854 592,854 - - 592,854 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,430 6,346 1,033 - 5,312 16% 16% GRANT EXPENDITURES 2,500 82,500 - 8,000 74,500 0% 10% Total Expenditures 5,909,128 5,909,128 1,301,216 53,259 4,554,652 22% 23% 26-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
OTHER REVENUE - - (2,755) - 2,755 100% 100% Total Revenue - - (2,755) - 2,755 100% 100% SALARIES AND WAGES 978,767 978,767 191,218 - 787,549 20% 20% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 650,072 650,072 132,118 - 517,954 20% 20% PROF & ADMIN 643,652 643,652 270,127 148,808 224,717 42% 65% Paid professional services for firewall security OTHER OPERATING 69,880 69,880 14,135 74,594 (18,849) 20% 127% PO encumbered with Ricoh for rental services UTILITIES 435,100 435,100 18,885 18,614 397,602 4% 9% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 727,220 797,620 683,462 - 114,158 86% 86% Paid Tyler Technologies majority of contract services for software COST POOL 114,668 114,668 - - 114,668 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,030,000 959,600 118,317 71,242 770,041 12% 20% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (410,873) (410,873) - - (410,873) 0% 0% Total Expenditures 4,238,486 4,238,486 1,428,263 313,257 2,496,967 34% 41%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
36-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
OTHER TAXES (1,607,614) (1,607,614) (279,736) - (1,327,878) 17% 17% OPER XFERS IN (86,778) (86,778) (21,690) - (65,088) 25% 25% Total Revenue (1,694,392) (1,694,392) (301,426) - (1,392,966) 18% 18% SALARIES AND WAGES 704,487 704,487 155,357 - 549,130 22% 22% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 420,961 420,961 102,942 - 318,019 24% 24% PROF & ADMIN 1,348,936 1,288,936 25,513 560,747 702,676 2% 45% Multiple PO's encumbered for various services OTHER OPERATING 305,150 305,150 466 2,659 302,025 0% 1% UTILITIES 440 440 35 - 405 8% 8% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 0% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 2,781,974 2,721,974 284,313 563,406 1,874,255 10% 31% 37-INTERNAL SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES 234,114 234,114 73,769 - 160,345 32% 32% Administrative adjustment, executive salaries are not being allocated between Risk Management and HR per the budget, will make correction
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 110,057 110,057 40,954 - 69,103 37% 37% Administrative adjustment, executive benefits are not being allocated between Risk Management and HR per the budget, will make correction
PROF & ADMIN 31,400 31,400 - - 31,400 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 1,500 1,500 171 1,329 - 11% 100% PO encumbered with Ricoh for copier services Total Expenditures 378,071 378,071 114,894 1,329 261,848 30% 31% 38-TRANSPORTATION OPERATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (35,000) (35,000) (7,917) - (27,083) 23% 23% Fee revenue is unpredictable Total Revenue (35,000) (35,000) (7,917) - (27,083) 23% 23% SALARIES AND WAGES 134,503 134,503 56,228 - 78,275 42% 42% Grant reimbursement for the costs is still pending PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 61,922 61,922 33,224 - 28,698 54% 54% Medicare and PERS benefits higher than anticipated PROF & ADMIN 9,000 9,000 - - 9,000 0% 0% 38-TRANSPORTATION OPERATION
OTHER OPERATING 13,800 13,800 203 2,814 10,784 1% 22% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 10,000 10,000 - - 10,000 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,000 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 231,225 231,225 89,655 2,814 138,757 39% 40%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 1 - General Fund
Quarter 1 Budget Report

GENERAL FUND

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED

BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB. %

USED NOTES
91-NON-DEPARTMENTAL
PROPERTY TAXES (46,056,962) (46,056,962) - - (46,056,962) 0% 0% SALES & USE TAX (55,282,200) (55,282,200) (2,464,665) - (52,817,535) 4% 4% UTILITY USERS TAX (49,963,589) (49,963,589) (17,672,407) - (32,291,182) 35% 35% OTHER TAXES (20,030,835) (20,030,835) (1,998,960) - (18,031,875) 10% 10% LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (8,192,894) (8,192,894) (1,471,716) - (6,721,178) 18% 18% FINES & FORFEITURES (325,275) (325,275) (42,539) - (282,736) 13% 13% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (236,079) (236,079) - - (236,079) 0% 0% CHARGES FOR SERVICES (132,000) (132,000) - - (132,000) 0% 0% OTHER REVENUE (60,000) (60,000) (14,568) - (45,432) 24% 24% RENTAL INCOME (330,939) (330,939) (63,296) - (267,643) 19% 19% INTERGOV STATE TAXES (125,000) (125,000) - - (125,000) 0% 0% INTERGOV STATE GRANT (165,000) (165,000) - - (165,000) 0% 0% OPER XFERS IN (16,476,646) (16,476,646) (16,476,646) - - 100% 100% Paid PTORS payment for the year.

Total Revenue (197,377,419) (197,377,419) (40,204,797) - (157,172,622) 20% 20% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,108,284 2,108,284 - - 2,108,284 0% 0% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 4,038,140 4,038,140 1,480,129 - 2,558,011 37% 37% Paid retiree health benefits PROF & ADMIN 1,634,011 1,594,011 113,494 179,394 1,301,124 7% 18% OTHER OPERATING 2,361,882 2,341,882 45,750 61,865 2,234,267 2% 5% COST POOL 4,179,233 4,179,233 - - 4,179,233 0% 0% A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (566,610) (566,610) - - (566,610) 0% 0% OPER XFERS OUT 11,551,587 11,551,587 1,637,216 - 9,914,371 14% 14% Total Expenditures 27,443,345 27,423,345 3,276,589 277,226 23,869,530 12% 13% Grand Total Revenue (206,632,248) (206,642,248) (41,870,441) - (164,771,802) 20% 20% Grand Total Expenditures 206,467,248 206,772,477 37,509,577 7,075,400 162,187,499 18% 22% Net(Positive)/Negative (165,000) 130,229 (4,360,864) 7,075,400 (2,584,303) -3349% 2084%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
0001-General Fund
PROPERTY TAXES (46,056,962) (46,056,962) - - (46,056,962) 0% 0% '' SALES & USE TAX (55,282,200) (55,282,200) (2,464,665) - (52,817,535) 4% 4% '' UTILITY USERS TAX (49,963,589) (49,963,589) (17,672,407) - (32,291,182) 35% 35% '' OTHER TAXES (21,638,449) (21,638,449) (2,278,697) - (19,359,752) 11% 11% '' LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (11,129,402) (11,129,402) (1,940,532) - (9,188,870) 17% 17% '' FINES & FORFEITURES (475,275) (475,275) (10,304) - (464,971) 2% 2% '' USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (236,079) (236,079) - - (236,079) 0% 0% '' CHARGES FOR SERVICES (3,571,292) (3,571,292) (586,021) - (2,985,271) 16% 16% '' OTHER REVENUE (187,500) (187,500) (67,048) - (120,452) 36% 36% '' RENTAL INCOME (874,506) (874,506) (233,227) - (641,280) 27% 27% '' INTERGOV STATE TAXES (125,000) (125,000) - - (125,000) 0% 0% '' INTERGOV STATE GRANT (175,000) (175,000) - - (175,000) 0% 0% '' INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (253,569) (263,569) (119,209) - (144,360) 45% 45% '' PROC FR SLE PROP (100,000) (100,000) - - (100,000) 0% 0% '' OPER XFERS IN (16,563,424) (16,563,424) (16,498,336) - (65,088) 100% 100% Total Revenue (206,632,248) (206,642,248) (41,870,445) - (164,771,802) 20% 20% See General Fund Reports ''
SALARIES AND WAGES 78,761,868 78,549,213 16,158,437 - 62,390,776 21% 21% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 66,929,804 66,887,328 14,746,497 - 52,140,831 22% 22% '' PROF & ADMIN 16,977,138 17,173,006 1,771,014 3,780,379 11,621,613 10% 32% '' OTHER OPERATING 7,970,902 7,987,130 1,195,630 1,738,687 5,052,813 15% 37% '' UTILITIES 5,399,957 5,397,722 821,829 900,421 3,675,473 15% 32% '' EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 2,731,448 2,714,957 842,428 551,802 1,320,727 31% 51% '' PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 25,725 29,641 3,770 24,871 1,000 13% 97% '' COST POOL 15,277,766 15,277,766 - - 15,277,766 0% 0% '' ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,172,136 3,455,211 133,172 71,242 3,250,798 4% 6% '' DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 1,037,009 1,037,009 118,080 - 918,929 11% 11% '' A87 COST PLAN REIMBS (3,531,610) (3,531,610) - - (3,531,610) 0% 0% '' GRANT EXPENDITURES 2,500 82,500 - 8,000 74,500 0% 10% '' OPER XFERS OUT 11,877,605 11,877,605 1,718,722 - 10,158,883 14% 14% '' Total Expenditures 206,632,248 206,937,477 37,509,577 7,075,400 162,352,499 18% 22% See General Fund Reports

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
perations Funds -
1003-Transportation Operation - - - OTHER REVENUE (20,000) (20,000) (1,553) - (18,448) 8% 8% Revenue is not received equally monthly INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (859,097) (859,097) - - (859,097) 0% 0% Reimbursements will be processed after expenditures occur Total Revenue (879,097) (879,097) (1,553) - (877,544) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 213,008 213,008 54,984 - 158,024 26% 26% Bonus pay was not budgeted PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 230,737 230,737 58,253 - 172,484 25% 25% PROF & ADMIN 110,000 110,000 - - 110,000 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 12,900 12,900 288 6,713 5,899 2% 54% PO encumbered with Aramark for laundry and dry cleaning service UTILITIES 2,500 2,500 380 - 2,120 15% 15% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 19,097 19,097 - - 19,097 0% 0% COST POOL 261,260 261,260 - - 261,260 0% 0% Total Expenditures 849,502 849,502 113,905 6,713 728,884 13% 14% 1012-Hilltop Landscape Maintenance District
PROPERTY TAXES (1,091,839) (1,091,839) - - (1,091,839) 0% 0% Property tax assessment is received in December, April, and June OPER XFERS IN (229,115) (229,115) (57,287) - (171,828) 25% 25% Total Revenue (1,320,954) (1,320,954) (57,287) - (1,263,667) 4% 4% -
SALARIES AND WAGES 511,840 511,840 106,506 - 405,334 21% 21% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 386,386 386,386 98,524 - 287,862 25% 25% PROF & ADMIN 45,000 45,000 6,375 15,375 23,250 14% 48% PO encumbered with SCI Consulting Group for administrative services
OTHER OPERATING 70,691 70,691 7,583 20,531 42,577 11% 40% PO encumbered with Aramark for laundry and dry cleaning services
UTILITIES 88,000 88,000 16,092 - 71,908 18% 18% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 75,000 75,000 10,285 23,387 41,328 14% 45% PO encumbered with North Richmond Properties for Hilltop Yard lease
COST POOL 230,455 230,455 - - 230,455 0% 0% Total Expenditures 1,407,372 1,407,372 245,365 59,292 1,102,715 17% 22% - -
1015-Marina Bay Landscape & Lighting District
PROPERTY TAXES (688,858) (688,858) - - (688,858) 0% 0% Property tax assessment is received in December, April, and June

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
OPER XFERS IN (462,436) (462,436) (115,612) - (346,824) 25% 25% Total Revenue (1,151,294) (1,151,294) (115,612) - (1,035,682) 10% 10% SALARIES AND WAGES 478,364 478,364 115,182 - 363,182 24% 24% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 344,979 344,979 93,276 - 251,703 27% 27% PROF & ADMIN 53,503 53,503 6,738 46,766 - 13% 100% PO encumbered for park restroom cleaning OTHER OPERATING 78,703 78,703 8,847 - 69,856 11% 11% UTILITIES 134,395 134,395 39,008 - 95,387 29% 29% EBMUD payments EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 7,075 7,075 3,508 1,929 1,638 50% 77% PO encumbered for contract services COST POOL 194,271 194,271 - - 194,271 0% 0% Total Expenditures 1,291,290 1,291,290 266,559 48,695 976,036 21% 24% 1050-CR. Planning & Building
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (6,902,259) (6,902,259) (1,551,296) - (5,350,963) 22% 22% Revenue is slightly lower than budgeted but revenues are not received equally monthly.

CHARGES FOR SERVICES (2,989,592) (2,989,592) (168,536) - (2,821,056) 6% 6% Revenue is not received equally monthly OTHER REVENUE - - (20) - 20 100% 100% INTERGOV STATE GRANT (500,000) (5,374,517) - - (5,374,517) - Reimbursements will be processed after expenditures occur OPER XFERS IN (1,800,000) (1,800,000) - - (1,800,000) - Transfers are processed as needed Total Revenue (12,191,851) (17,066,368) (1,719,852) - (15,346,516) 10% 10% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,473,701 2,473,701 532,024 - 1,941,677 22% 22% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,602,380 1,602,380 351,151 - 1,251,229 22% 22% PROF & ADMIN 6,020,078 11,483,560 388,030 1,521,373 9,574,157 3% 17% OTHER OPERATING 83,406 113,837 9,718 14,430 89,689 9% 21% UTILITIES 9,000 9,000 993 - 8,007 11% 11% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 11,409 50,409 - 200 50,209 0% 0% COST POOL 1,985,965 1,985,965 - - 1,985,965 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 12,186,939 17,719,852 1,281,915 1,536,003 14,901,933 7% 16% -
1205-Employment & Training
OTHER REVENUE - - (44) - 44 100% 100% INTERGOV FED GRANT (3,484,752) (3,484,752) (199,818) - (3,284,934) 6% 6% Workforce Investment Act grants and Youthbuild revenues will occur after expenses take place

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (1,186,601) (1,186,601) - - (1,186,601) 0% 0% SB1 Construction Careers and Prison to Employment Planning revenues will occur when programs begin
INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (2,328,927) (2,328,927) - - (2,328,927) 0% 0% E&T Career Services and Soda Foundation programs revenue will occur when programs begin
OPER XFERS IN (2,723,201) (2,723,201) - - (2,723,201) 0% 0% Reimagining transfers in will occur quarterly after expenditures happen
Total Revenue (9,723,481) (9,723,481) (199,862) - (9,523,619) 2% 2% SALARIES AND WAGES 1,838,079 1,838,079 294,309 - 1,543,770 16% 16% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,462,600 1,462,600 226,700 - 1,235,900 15% 15% PROF & ADMIN 7,300 8,288 8,170 988 (870) 99% 110% Unbudgeted travel and training for staff development; a budget transfer will be completed for the overage
OTHER OPERATING 69,380 74,461 3,215 6,908 64,338 4% 14% UTILITIES 9,000 9,000 1,451 4,530 3,019 16% 66% PO encumbered with Comcast for internet EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 508,879 538,232 - 42,163 496,069 0% 8% COST POOL 693,079 693,079 - - 693,079 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 100,000 100,678 - 678 100,000 0% 1% GRANT EXPENDITURES 4,622,448 4,921,397 8,138 306,043 4,607,216 0% 6% EMPLMT & TRNG ALLOC 2,824 2,824 - - 2,824 0% 0% Total Expenditures 9,313,589 9,648,638 541,984 361,309 8,745,345 6% 9% 4006-Stormwater
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (75,000) (75,000) (3,608) - (71,392) 5% 5% Fee revenue is unpredictable CHARGES FOR SERVICES (1,930,296) (1,930,296) (5,973) - (1,924,323) 0% 0% Property tax assessment is received in December, April, and June RENTAL INCOME (4,380) (4,380) (924) - (3,456) 21% 21% INTERGOV STATE GRANT - (1,598,844) - - (1,598,844) 0% 0% Total Revenue (2,009,676) (3,608,520) (10,505) - (3,598,015) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 1,708,564 109,720 4,002 - 105,718 4% 4% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 75,431 75,431 2,856 - 72,575 4% 4% PROF & ADMIN 1,678,806 1,954,285 153,854 312,625 1,487,806 8% 24% PO's encumbered with Veolia for annual operation &
maintenance of the Treatment Plant and Sanitary Sewer System OTHER OPERATING 2,500 193,500 248 191,000 2,252 0% 99% PO encumbered with Owen Equipment Sales for street sweeper lease
UTILITIES 41,250 41,250 2,792 - 38,458 7% 7%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
COST POOL 118,654 118,654 - 118,654 0% 0% Total Expenditures 3,625,205 2,492,840 163,752 503,625 1,825,462 7% 27% Total Other Operations Rev (27,276,353) (33,749,714) (2,104,670) - (31,645,044) 6% 6% Total Other Operations Exp 28,673,897 33,409,492 2,613,481 2,515,637 28,280,375 8% 15% Revenue Funds
1001-Secured Pension Override
PROPERTY TAXES (17,350,450) (17,350,450) - - (17,350,450) 0% 0% Property tax assessment is received in December, April, and June Total Revenue (17,350,450) (17,350,450) - - (17,350,450) 0% 0% OPER XFERS OUT 17,350,989 17,350,989 17,350,989 - - 100% 100% Transfer-out completed for the year Total Expenditures 17,350,989 17,350,989 17,350,989 - - 100% 100% - -
1005-Library Fund
FINES & FORFEITURES - - (846) - 846 100% 100% Budget will be added at mid-year OTHER REVENUE (2,500) (2,500) - - (2,500) 0% 0% Donations can be received anytime during the year. In previous years they were received in September and December
INTERGOV FED GRANT (44,884) (44,884) - - (44,884) 0% 0% p
occurred
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (126,222) (167,876) - - (167,876) 0% 0% Reimbursements will be received after expenditures have INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (10,000) (27,952) - - (27,952) 0% 0% Reimbursements will be received after expenditures have Total Revenue (183,606) (243,212) (846) - (242,366) 0% 0% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - 22,942 - - 22,942 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 139,259 185,513 17,565 4,146 163,803 9% 12% OTHER OPERATING 14,701 22,834 1,015 - 21,820 4% 4% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,000 3,000 - - 3,000 0% 0% GRANT EXPENDITURES 5,500 8,922 1,532 - 7,390 17% 17% Total Expenditures 162,460 243,212 20,111 4,146 218,955 8% 10% 1007-Emergency Medical Services
PROPERTY TAXES (215,586) (215,586) - - (215,586) 0% 0% Property tax assessment is received in December, April, and June Total Revenue (215,586) (215,586) - - (215,586) 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 102,600 102,600 3,625 4,000 94,976 4% 7%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
OTHER OPERATING 77,000 77,000 4,456 - 72,544 6% 6% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 80,000 80,000 - - 80,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 259,600 259,600 8,081 4,000 247,519 3% 5% - -
1009-Veolia Mitigation
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (25,000) (25,000) (6,250) - (18,750) 25% 25% Total Revenue (25,000) (25,000) (6,250) - (18,750) 25% 25% PROF & ADMIN 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% -
1010-N. Richmond Waste
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (124,207) (124,207) - - (124,207) 0% 0% Revenue is not received equally monthly Total Revenue (124,207) (124,207) - - (124,207) 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 122,375 122,375 - - 122,375 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 0% UTILITIES 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 124,375 124,375 - - 124,375 0% 0% -
1013-Hazmat Fund
PROF & ADMIN 53,400 53,400 - - 53,400 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 10,000 10,000 - - 10,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 63,400 63,400 - - 63,400 0% 0% - - -
1017-Chevron Modernization Project & CIA
INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (206,842) (206,842) - - (206,842) 0% 0% Grant revenue is received after expense occurs OTHER REVENUE (69,000) (69,000) - - (69,000) 0% 0% Revenue from rebates will occur after expenditures take place Total Revenue (275,842) (275,842) - - (275,842) 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 8,880,135 8,880,135 24,790 498,499 8,356,845 0% 6% OTHER OPERATING 69,941 69,941 - - 69,941 0% 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 518,000 518,000 - 500,000 18,000 0% 97% PO encumbered for contracts to install solar panels ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,406,156 1,638,073 91,881 140,738 1,405,453 6% 14%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
GRANT EXPENDITURES 50,000 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 10,924,232 11,156,149 116,672 1,139,237 9,900,240 1% 11% - -
1018-Rent Control
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (3,062,687) (3,062,687) (1,563,165) - (1,499,522) 51% 51% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (14,000) (14,000) - - (14,000) 0% 0% Revenue is not received equally monthly.

OTHER REVENUE (30,000) (30,000) (7,455) - (22,545) 25% 25% Revenue is not received equally monthly.

INTERGOV OTHER GRANT - - (10,000) - 10,000 - Total Revenue (3,106,687) (3,106,687) (1,580,620) - (1,526,067) 51% 51% SALARIES AND WAGES 1,246,571 1,246,571 296,227 - 950,344 24% 24% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 872,288 872,288 202,853 - 669,435 23% 23% PROF & ADMIN 362,085 365,085 22,099 192,145 150,841 6% 59% PO encumbered with Collective Legal Services for eviction defense services
OTHER OPERATING 60,204 59,904 468 5,114 54,322 1% 9% UTILITIES 500 500 - - 500 0% 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS - 300 - 265 35 - PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 9,300 9,300 8,077 8 1,215 87% 87% Payment for annual insurance coverage COST POOL 184,632 184,632 - - 184,632 0% 0% Total Expenditures 2,735,580 2,738,580 529,724 197,532 2,011,325 19% 27% - -
1055-Encroachment Services
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (838,000) (838,000) (225,630) - (612,370) 27% 27% CHARGES FOR SERVICES (227,000) (227,000) (65,362) - (161,638) 29% 29% Total Revenue (1,065,000) (1,065,000) (290,992) - (774,008) 27% 27% SALARIES AND WAGES 403,126 403,126 69,114 - 334,012 17% 17% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 323,028 323,028 56,795 - 266,233 18% 18% OTHER OPERATING 4,700 4,700 42 708 3,950 1% 16% UTILITIES 2,900 2,900 38 - 2,862 1% 1% COST POOL 172,555 172,555 - - 172,555 0% 0% Total Expenditures 906,309 906,309 125,988 708 779,613 14% 14% 1303-Kids First Initiative
OPER XFERS IN (3,936,896) (3,936,896) (984,230) - (2,952,666) 25% 25%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
Total Revenue (3,936,896) (3,936,896) (984,230) - (2,952,666) 25% 25% SALARIES AND WAGES 187,313 143,632 6,623 - 137,009 5% 5% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 78,764 154,726 3,156 - 151,570 2% 2% PROF & ADMIN 3,623,000 3,623,000 2,178 577,592 3,043,230 0% 16% OTHER OPERATING 14,000 14,000 187 - 13,814 1% 1% Total Expenditures 3,903,077 3,935,358 12,144 577,592 3,345,622 0% 15% 1304-Emergency Operations & Disaster Recovery
INTERGOV FED GRANT - - (1,058) - 1,058 100% 100% Total Revenue - - (1,058) - 1,058 - - OTHER OPERATING - - 824 - (824) 100% 100% Purchased safety supplies and materials. Budget will be added at mid-year
Total Expenditures - - 824 - (824) #DIV/0! 100% 1305 - PUBLIC ART
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (200,000) (200,000) (505,340) - 305,340 253% 253% Received Cares Act credit
Total Revenue (200,000) (200,000) (505,340) - 305,340 - - PROF & ADMIN 321,000 321,000 - 48,300 272,700 0% 15% Total Expenditures 321,000 321,000 - 48,300 272,700 0% 15% 1306 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT
INTERGOV FED GRANT (2,770,400) (2,770,400) (13,870,362) - 11,099,962 501% 501% Total Revenue (2,770,400) (2,770,400) (13,870,362) - 11,099,962 501% 501% PROF & ADMIN 950,000 1,403,109 37,258 694,767 671,083 3% 52% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,820,400 1,964,725 - 144,325 1,820,400 0% 7% Total Expenditures 2,770,400 3,367,834 37,258 839,092 2,491,483 0% 26% Total Special Revenue Fund (29,253,674) (29,313,280) (17,239,697) - (12,073,583) 0% 59% Total Special Revenue Fund 39,313,441 40,566,805 18,201,791 2,810,607 19,187,667 0% 52% mprovement Fund
1002-State Gas Tax - - - INTERGOV STATE TAXES (3,203,193) (3,203,193) (541,666) - (2,661,527) 17% 17% Gas Tax revenue has a one month lag time Total Revenue (3,203,193) (3,203,193) (541,666) - (2,661,527) 17% 17%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
PROF & ADMIN 4,000 4,000 - - 4,000 0% 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 850,000 850,000 217,110 - 632,890 26% 26% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,961,755 2,007,922 248,975 1,079,287 679,660 12% 66% Multi PO's encumbered for equipment rental, asphalt materials and supplies to support the street paving program
Total Expenditures 2,815,755 2,861,922 466,085 1,079,287 1,316,550 16% 54% 1004-Asset Seizure Fund - -
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (20,000) (20,000) (66) - (19,934) 0% 0% Asset Seizure revenue is unpredictable Total Revenue (20,000) (20,000) (66) - (19,934) 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,000 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 20,000 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 0% 1006-Outside Funded Services
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (6,704,833) (6,939,833) - - (6,939,833) 0% 0% Grant revenue is received after expense occurs INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (611,164) (611,164) (92,125) - (519,039) 15% 15% Grant revenue is received after expense occurs Total Revenue (7,315,997) (7,550,997) (92,125) - (7,458,872) 1% 1% PROF & ADMIN 3,611,939 5,075,312 420 1,314,941 3,759,951 0% 26% OTHER OPERATING 7,234 10,972 743 - 10,229 7% 7% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 302,000 304,156 - 2,156 302,000 0% 1% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,759,415 3,759,415 - 713,972 3,045,443 0% 19% GRANT EXPENDITURES 982,251 982,251 3,481 - 978,770 0% 0% Total Expenditures 8,662,839 10,132,106 4,644 2,031,069 8,096,393 0% 20% - -
1019-SB1 RMRA
INTERGOV STATE TAXES (2,510,376) (2,510,376) (193,736) - (2,316,640) 8% 8% SB1 funding delayed due to timing of filing annual report.

Revenue budget will catch up soon
Total Revenue (2,510,376) (2,510,376) (193,736) - (2,316,640) 8% 8% PROF & ADMIN 80,000 - - 80,000 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,315,337 2,644,446 2,373 1,099,412 1,542,661 0% 42% Multiple PO's encumbered for SB1 funded projects Total Expenditures 2,315,337 2,724,446 2,373 1,099,412 1,622,661 0% 40% - -
1054-Engineering Grants

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
INTERGOV FED GRANT (8,245) (8,245) - - (8,245) 0% 0% Grant revenue is received after expense occurs INTERGOV STATE GRANT (13,920,623) (13,920,623) - - (13,920,623) 0% 0% Grant revenue is received after expense occurs INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (580,910) (580,910) - - (580,910) 0% 0% Grant revenue is received after expense occurs Total Revenue (14,509,778) (14,509,778) - - (14,509,778) 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN - 149,926 28,045 - 121,881 19% 19% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 30,000 30,000 - - 30,000 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 14,479,778 17,994,367 477,485 9,495,540 8,021,342 3% 55% Multiple PO's encumbered for Engineering Grant funded projects Total Expenditures 14,479,778 18,174,293 505,531 9,495,540 8,173,223 3% 55% 2001-General Capital Fund
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (443) - 443 100% 100%

OTHER REVENUE - - - - - - - Total Revenue - - (443) - 443 100% 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,061,487 3,569,774 42,148 780,817 2,746,809 1% 23% Total Expenditures 3,061,487 3,569,774 42,148 780,817 2,746,809 1% 23% - -
2002-Measure J

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - - INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (4,292,882) (4,292,882) - - (4,292,882) 0% 0% Measure J revenue budget is for 13th St., I-80 Interchange Projects, plus the annual allotment of $1.3M
Total Revenue (4,292,882) (4,292,882) - - (4,292,882) 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 200,000 200,000 - - 200,000 0% 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 150,230 150,230 - - 150,230 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,436,717 4,269,676 191,191 741,767 3,336,717 4% 22% Total Expenditures 3,786,947 4,619,906 191,191 741,767 3,686,947 4% 20% - -
2110-Impact Fee-Parks
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (5,364) - 5,364 100% 100% Total Revenue - - (5,364) - 5,364 100% 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,000 15,000 - - 15,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 15,000 15,000 - - 15,000 0% 0%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
- -
2111-Impact Fee-Traffic
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (26,376) - 26,376 100% 100% Total Revenue - - (26,376) - 26,376 100% 100% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 57,419 57,419 - - 57,419 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 206,220 313,015 7,143 102,447 203,425 2% 35% Multiple PO's encumbered for the Traffic Safety Improvement Project
Total Expenditures 263,639 370,434 7,143 102,447 260,844 2% 30% - -
2113-Impact Fee-Fire
OTHER OPERATING 89,383 89,383 - 89,383 0% 0% Total Expenditures 89,383 89,383 - - 89,383 0% 0% - -
2114-Impact Fee Police
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (3,752) - 3,752 100% 100%

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - - - Total Revenue - - (3,752) - 3,752 100% 100% - -
2115-Impact Fee-Comm/Aquatics
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (22,849) - 22,849 100% 100%

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - - - Total Revenue - - (22,849) - 22,849 100% 100% - -
2116-Impact Fee-Parks/Open
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (95,305) - 95,305 100% 100%

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - - - - Total Revenue - - (95,305) - 95,305 100% 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 373,264 373,264 - - 373,264 0% 0% Total Expenditures 373,264 373,264 - - 373,264 0% 0% 2117-Impact Fee-Library
PROF & ADMIN 55,000 74,100 - 9,750 64,350 0% 13%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 414,295 645,195 3,409 3,000 638,786 1% 1% Total Expenditures 469,295 719,295 3,409 12,750 703,136 0% 2% - - -
2120-Impact Fee-Wastewater `
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - (25,110) - 25,110 100% 100% Total Revenue - - (25,110) - 25,110 100% 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 794,130 1,636,521 4,079 838,312 794,130 0% 51% PO encumbered with Veolia for work on the Cogeneration Project Total Expenditures 794,130 1,636,521 4,079 838,312 794,130 0% 51% Total Capital Improvement (31,852,226) (32,087,226) (1,047,849) - (31,039,377) 3% 3% Total Capital Improvement 37,146,854 45,306,343 1,226,603 16,181,400 27,898,340 3% 38% Debt Service Funds
3001-DS-2005 Taxable POB
PROPERTY TAXES (13,052,125) (13,052,125) - - (13,052,125) 0% 0% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (26,353) - 26,353 100% 100% Total Revenue (13,052,125) (13,052,125) (26,353) - (13,025,772) 0% 0% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 13,052,125 13,052,125 12,804,017 11,050 237,058 98% 98% Total Expenditures 13,052,125 13,052,125 12,804,017 11,050 237,058 98% 98% 3002-DS-99A Pension Obligation Bond
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (290) - 290 100% 100% OPER XFERS IN (809,523) (809,523) (809,523) - - 100% 100% Total Revenue (809,523) (809,523) (809,813) - 290 100% 100% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 809,023 809,023 724,112 - 84,911 90% 90% Total Expenditures 809,023 809,023 724,112 - 84,911 90% 90% 3005-DS-07 Civic Center
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (5,349,070) (5,349,070) - - (5,349,070) 0% 0% OPER XFERS IN (1,418,372) (1,418,372) (354,599) - (1,063,773) 25% 25% Total Revenue (6,767,442) (6,767,442) (354,599) - (6,412,843) 5% 5%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 7,750,938 7,750,938 6,070 - 7,744,868 0% 0% Total Expenditures 7,750,938 7,750,938 6,070 - 7,744,868 0% 0% Total Debt Service Funds R (20,629,090) (20,629,090) (1,190,765) - (19,438,325) 6% 6% Total Debt Service Funds E 21,612,086 21,612,086 13,534,200 11,050 8,066,836 63% 63% Enterprise Funds
4001-Port of Richmond
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (614) - 614 100% 100% RENTAL INCOME (10,348,460) (10,348,460) (869,256) - (9,479,204) 8% 8% Rental income has a lag time and should catch up by end of year Total Revenue (10,348,460) (10,348,460) (869,870) - (9,478,589) 8% 8% SALARIES AND WAGES 466,228 466,228 46,045 - 420,183 10% 10% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 267,043 267,043 37,931 - 229,112 14% 14% PROF & ADMIN 953,121 953,121 12,486 72,512 868,123 1% 9% OTHER OPERATING 12,200 12,200 193 4,000 8,007 2% 34% PO encumbered with Ricoh for copier service UTILITIES 359,600 359,600 76,497 3,841 279,263 21% 22% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 49,000 49,000 - - 49,000 0% 0% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 40,000 40,000 - - 40,000 0% 0% COST POOL 476,163 476,163 - - 476,163 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,250,000 1,250,000 - - 1,250,000 0% 0% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 4,690,700 4,690,700 - - 4,690,700 0% 0% Total Expenditures 8,564,055 8,564,055 173,151 80,352 8,310,551 2% 3% -
4003-Wastewater
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (36,000) (36,000) (30,645) - (5,355) 85% 85% FINES & FORFEITURES (2,000) (2,000) - - (2,000) 0% 0% Revenue is not received equally monthly.

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (16,709) - 16,709 100% 100% CHARGES FOR SERVICES (26,905,520) (26,905,520) (147,341) - (26,758,179) 1% 1% Property tax assessment is received in December, April, and June Total Revenue (26,943,520) (26,943,520) (194,695) - (26,748,825) 1% 1% SALARIES AND WAGES 1,217,321 1,217,321 172,757 - 1,044,564 14% 14% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 734,156 734,156 119,899 - 614,257 16% 16%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
PROF & ADMIN 10,251,945 13,355,387 1,186,219 2,385,396 9,783,772 9% 27% PO's encumbered with Veolia for annual operation & OTHER OPERATING 346,346 346,346 2,642 4,281 339,423 1% 2% UTILITIES 1,308,323 1,308,323 342,500 - 965,823 26% 26% PO's encumbered with Veolia for annual operation &
maintenance of the Treatment Plant and Sanitary Sewer System EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 415,000 475,109 16,200 151,272 307,637 3% 35% PO's encumbered with Veolia for annual operation &
maintenance of the Treatment Plant and Sanitary Sewer System COST POOL 955,041 955,041 - - 955,041 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 36,310,185 63,728,123 3,877,667 24,209,925 35,640,531 6% 44% PO's encumbered with Veolia for annual operation &
maintenance of the Treatment Plant and Sanitary Sewer System DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 7,979,500 7,979,500 5,320,205 - 2,659,295 67% 67% PO's encumbered with Veolia for annual operation &
maintenance of the Treatment Plant and Sanitary Sewer System Total Expenditures 59,517,817 90,099,306 11,038,089 26,750,874 52,310,343 12% 42% - -
4005-Marina Fund
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (1,841) - 1,841 100% 100% RENTAL INCOME (450,000) (450,000) - - (450,000) 0% 0% Will research Total Revenue (450,000) (450,000) (1,841) - (448,159) 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 929,161 929,161 - - 929,161 0% 0% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 206,815 206,815 206,815 - - 100% 100% Annual debt service payment processed OPER XFERS OUT 86,778 86,778 21,690 - 65,088 25% 25% Total Expenditures 1,222,754 1,222,754 228,505 - 994,249 19% 19% - - -
- - -
4008-KCRT - Cable Television
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (1,250,000) (1,250,000) - - (1,250,000) 0% 0% Cable revenue has declined annually, last year 88.3% of budget was received
Total Revenue (1,250,000) (1,250,000) - - (1,250,000) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 455,280 455,280 118,646 - 336,634 26% 26%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 341,209 341,209 83,660 - 257,549 25% 25% Professional development over budget, will process transfer to cover
PROF & ADMIN 58,800 58,800 36,766 - 22,034 63% 63% Annual fee payment for hosting and support media center storage
OTHER OPERATING 37,721 37,721 9,441 - 28,280 25% 25% UTILITIES 5,727 5,727 536 4,691 500 9% 91% Monthly cable access with Comcast for 5 facilities PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 604 604 - - 604 0% 0% COST POOL 255,827 255,827 - - 255,827 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 120,000 120,000 12,627 - 107,373 11% 11% Total Expenditures 1,275,168 1,275,168 261,676 4,691 1,008,801 21% 21% Total Enterprise Funds Rev (38,991,980) (38,991,980) (1,066,407) - (37,925,573) 3% 3% Total Enterprise Funds Exp 70,579,794 101,161,283 11,701,422 26,835,918 62,623,944 12% 38% Services Funds
5001-Insurance Reserves
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (19,184,635) (19,184,635) (2,174,804) - (17,009,831) 11% 11% OTHER REVENUE - - (167,319) - 167,319 100% 100% Total Revenue (19,184,635) (19,184,635) (2,342,123) - (16,842,512) 12% 12% SALARIES AND WAGES 440,821 440,821 122,834 - 317,987 28% 28% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 277,397 277,397 72,315 - 205,082 26% 26% PROF & ADMIN 1,027,700 960,136 11,718 113,082 835,336 1% 13% OTHER OPERATING 50,500 50,500 632 - 49,868 1% 1% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 16,740,502 16,808,066 3,969,293 221,819 12,616,954 24% 25% COST POOL 533,987 533,987 - - 533,987 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,000 4,095,403 32,416 4,055,987 7,000 1% 100% Total Expenditures 19,077,907 23,166,310 4,209,207 4,390,888 14,566,215 18% 37% 5003-Equipment Services

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - CHARGES FOR SERVICES (5,120,000) (5,120,000) - - (5,120,000) 0% 0% OPER XFERS IN (426,018) (426,018) (106,509) - (319,509) 25% 25% Total Revenue (5,546,018) (5,546,018) (106,509) - (5,439,509) 2% 2% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,766,000 6,570,244 1,640 762,998 5,805,607 0% 12%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 326,018 326,018 81,505 - 244,514 25% 25% Total Expenditures 6,092,018 6,896,263 83,145 762,998 6,050,121 1% 12% 5008-Compensated Absences
SALARIES AND WAGES - - 446,987 - (446,987) 100% 100% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 6,406 - (6,406) 100% 100% Medicare tax ER share not budgeted Total Expenditures - - 453,392 - (453,392) 100% 100% Total Internal Services Fun (24,730,653) (24,730,653) (2,448,632) - (22,282,021) 10% 10% Total Internal Services Fun 25,169,925 30,062,572 4,745,744 5,153,885 20,162,943 16% 33% Department Funds
1200-Housing Administration
LICENSE, PRMITS & FEES - - (8,960) - 8,960 100% 100% OTHER REVENUE (567,110) (567,110) (524,401) - (42,710) 92% 92% Total Revenue (567,110) (567,110) (533,361) - (33,750) 94% 94% SALARIES AND WAGES 130,042 130,042 78,129 - 51,912 60% 60% Unbudgeted bonuses and severance expenditures, salary
reimbursements pending to be processed yet
PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 26,296 26,296 48,724 - (22,428) 185% 185% Benefits reimbursement pending to be processed PROF & ADMIN 28,956 28,956 417 2,552 25,987 1% 10% OTHER OPERATING 1,909 1,909 - - 1,909 0% 0% UTILITIES 801 801 - - 801 0% 0% COST POOL 123,459 123,459 - - 123,459 0% 0% Total Expenditures 311,463 311,463 127,271 2,552 181,640 41% 42% - -
1201-Community Development Block Grant
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (26,677) (26,677) (446) - (26,231) 2% 2% LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (149,898) (149,898) (66,571) - (83,327) 44% 44% Revenue is not received equally monthly.

Total Revenue (176,575) (176,575) (67,017) - (109,557) 38% 38% PROF & ADMIN 19,772 28,291 15,569 6,783 5,940 55% 79% OTHER OPERATING 51 51 - - 51 0% 0% COST POOL 26,923 26,923 - - 26,923 0% 0% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 935,000 972,795 41,017 263,156 668,622 4% 31%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
Total Expenditures 981,745 1,028,060 56,586 269,939 701,535 6% 32% -
1202-Home Program

LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (3,689) (3,689) - - (3,689) 0% Interest income is received after money is in the bank.

Total Revenue (3,689) (3,689) - - (3,689) 0% 0% 1203-Neighborhood Stabilization Program
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (144) (144) - - (144) 0% 0% Interest income is received after money is in the bank.

LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (15,000) (15,000) - - (15,000) 0% 0% Bond proceeds occur after sale of properties.

Total Revenue (15,144) (15,144) - - (15,144) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,373 2,373 - - 2,373 - PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,320 1,320 - - 1,320 - PROF & ADMIN 9,500 2,000 - 2,000 - 0% 100% Encumbered professional services for the year from Goldfarb & Lipman LLP to assist Housing.

Total Expenditures 13,193 5,693 - 2,000 3,693 0% 35% - - -
1207-COR-Neighborhood Stabilization (City)
PROC FR SLE PROP (133,664) (133,664) - - (133,664) 0% 0% No receipts from auction activity Total Revenue (133,664) (133,664) - - (133,664) 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 6,753 6,753 - - 6,753 0% 0% Total Expenditures 6,753 6,753 - - 6,753 0% 0% - - -
1208-COR-Successor Housing Agency
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (30,823) (30,823) - - (30,823) 0% 0% OTHER REVENUE (51,541) (51,541) - - (51,541) 0% 0% LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (83,480) (83,480) - - (83,480) 0% 0% Total Revenue (165,844) (165,844) - - (165,844) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 114,672 114,672 - - 114,672 0% 0% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 73,563 73,563 - - 73,563 0% 0% PROF & ADMIN 200 200 70 130 - 35% 100% PO encumbered for professional services for the year CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 1,188,435 1,188,435 70 130 1,188,235 0% 0%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
1209-CAL-Home Grant Fund
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (1,000) (1,000) (14,070) - 13,070 1407% 1407% Interest income received from money in the bank LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (63,142) (63,142) (35,575) - (27,567) 56% 56% Total Revenue (64,142) (64,142) (49,645) - (14,496) 77% 77% PROF & ADMIN 333 333 200 - 133 60% 60% Ameri national management fees higher than anticipated Total Expenditures 333 333 200 - 133 60% 60% 1302-Housing in Lieu Fee-Developer
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (568,000) (568,000) - - (568,000) 0% 0% Revenue is not received equally monthly.

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (566) (566) - - (566) 0% 0% Interest income is received after money is in the bank Total Revenue (568,566) (568,566) - - (568,566) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 98,803 98,803 - - 98,803 0% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 62,022 62,022 - - 62,022 0% PROF & ADMIN 15,300 15,300 - - 15,300 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,150,000 1,150,000 - - 1,150,000 0% 0% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 850,000 850,000 - - 850,000 0% 0% OPER XFERS OUT 480,000 480,000 - - 480,000 0% 0% Total Expenditures 2,656,125 2,656,125 - - 2,656,125 0% 0% -
2125-Section 108 Iron Triangle
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (250) (250) - - (250) 0% 0% Interest income is received after money is in the bank.

INTERGOV FED GRANT (300,000) (300,000) (6,867) - (293,134) 2% 2% Revenue will be received when expenses occur.

Total Revenue (300,250) (300,250) (6,867) - (293,384) 2% 2% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 300,000 300,000 6,867 293,134 2% 2% Total Expenditures 300,000 300,000 6,867 - 293,134 2% 2% - - -
2126-Housing CIP Fund
INTERGOV STATE GRANT (166,432) (166,432) - - (166,432) 0% 0% Total Revenue (166,432) (166,432) - - (166,432) 0% 0%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
Total Housing Department (2,161,415) (2,161,415) (656,890) - (1,504,525) 30% 30% Total Housing Department 5,146,584 5,496,861 190,993 272,069 4,849,607 3% 8% nd Housing Authority Funds
4101-RHA Housing Voucher-Section 8
OTHER OPERATING - - 69 - (69) 100% 100% Total Expenditures - - 69 - (69) 100% 100% - -
4201-RHA Capital Fund
INTERGOV FED GRANT (1,110,141) (1,110,141) - - (1,110,141) 0% 0% Total Revenue (1,110,141) (1,110,141) - - (1,110,141) 0% 0% OTHER OPERATING 20,000 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 344,626 344,626 - - 344,626 0% 0% GRANT EXPENDITURES 467,980 467,980 9,202 10,798 447,980 2% 4% OPER XFERS OUT 277,535 277,535 - - 277,535 0% 0% Total Expenditures 1,110,141 1,110,141 9,202 10,798 1,090,141 1% 2% - -
4401-RHA Hacienda
SALARIES AND WAGES - - 4,900 - (4,900) 100% 100% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 2,734 - (2,734) 100% 100% Total Expenditures - - 7,634 - (7,634) 100% 100% - -
4404-RHA Nevin Plaza
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (46) - 46 100% OTHER REVENUE (6,000) (6,000) - - (6,000) 0% 0% RENTAL INCOME (400,000) (400,000) (67,671) - (332,329) 17% 17% INTERGOV FED GRANT (635,243) (635,243) (213,402) - (421,841) 34% 34% OPER XFERS IN (1,036,515) (1,036,515) - - (1,036,515) 0% 0% Total Revenue (2,077,758) (2,077,758) (281,118) - (1,796,640) 14% 14% SALARIES AND WAGES 329,657 329,657 57,720 - 271,937 18% 18% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 254,542 254,542 42,563 - 211,979 17% 17% PROF & ADMIN 655,308 655,308 9,896 930 644,482 2% 2% OTHER OPERATING 80,445 80,445 7,592 10,755 62,098 9% 23% UTILITIES 530,108 530,108 40,399 - 489,709 8% 8%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 74,700 74,700 1,375 3,600 69,725 2% 7% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 38,120 38,120 - 20,120 18,000 0% 53% COST POOL 78,878 78,878 - - 78,878 0% 0% Total Expenditures 2,041,758 2,041,758 159,545 35,405 1,846,809 8% 10% 4405-RHA Nystrom Village
OTHER REVENUE (6,000) (6,000) - - (6,000) 0% 0% RENTAL INCOME (250,000) (250,000) (46,829) - (203,171) 19% 19% INTERGOV FED GRANT (416,629) (416,629) (138,250) - (278,379) 33% 33% Total Revenue (672,629) (672,629) (185,079) - (487,550) 28% 28% SALARIES AND WAGES 249,318 249,318 61,525 - 187,793 25% 25% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 194,769 194,769 43,437 - 151,332 22% 22% PROF & ADMIN 113,328 113,328 6,597 620 106,111 6% 6% OTHER OPERATING 50,630 50,630 4,804 7,747 38,080 9% 25% UTILITIES 195,100 195,100 33,150 - 161,950 17% 17% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 134,000 134,000 184 46,351 87,465 0% 35% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 25,420 25,420 - 13,420 12,000 0% 53% COST POOL 41,183 41,183 - - 41,183 0% 0% Total Expenditures 1,003,748 1,003,748 149,697 68,138 785,913 15% 22% 4406-Richmond Village One
INTERGOV FED GRANT (233,080) (233,080) (28,397) - (204,683) 12% 12% Total Revenue (233,080) (233,080) (28,397) - (204,683) 12% 12% SALARIES AND WAGES - - 2,005 - (2,005) 100% 100% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 1,032 - (1,032) 100% 100% UTILITIES 233,080 233,080 28,397 - 204,683 12% 12% Total Expenditures 233,080 233,080 31,434 - 201,646 13% 13% 4407-RHA Richmond Village Two
INTERGOV FED GRANT (205,818) (205,818) (24,942) - (180,876) 12% 12% Total Revenue (205,818) (205,818) (24,942) - (180,876) 12% 12% - - - -

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES
GRANT EXPENDITURES 205,818 205,818 24,942 - 180,876 12% 12% Total Expenditures 205,818 205,818 24,942 - 180,876 12% 12% 4408-RHA Richmond Village Three

OTHER REVENUE
INTERGOV FED GRANT (78,516) (78,516) (11,490) - (67,026) 15% 15% Total Revenue (78,516) (78,516) (11,490) - (67,026) 15% 15% GRANT EXPENDITURES 78,516 78,516 11,490 - 67,026 15% 15% Total Expenditures 78,516 78,516 11,490 - 67,026 15% 15% 4501-RHA Central Office Cost Center
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES - - (3) - 3 100% 100% RHA-CENTRAL OFFICE COST (146,983) (146,983) - - (146,983) 100% 100% Total Revenue (146,983) (146,983) (3) - (146,980) 0% 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 38,255 38,255 38,569 - (314) 101% 101% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 88,354 88,354 42,383 - 45,971 48% 48% PROF & ADMIN - - 380 - (380) - OTHER OPERATING - - 631 - (631) - UTILITIES - - 1,836 - (1,836) 100% 100% COST POOL 20,374 20,374 - - 20,374 -

GRANT EXPENDITURES - - - - - - Total Expenditures 146,983 146,983 83,799 - 63,184 4502 - RHA-HOUSING CORPORATION
Total Revenue - - - - - COST POOL 20,374 20,374 - - 20,374 -

GRANT EXPENDITURES - - - - - - Total Expenditures 20,374 20,374 - - 20,374 - Total Richmond Housing A (4,524,925) (4,524,925) (531,029) - (3,993,896) - Total Richmond Housing A 4,840,418 4,840,418 477,812 114,340 4,248,266 - 6050-General Pension Fund

City of Richmond
FY2022-23 - September 2022
Attachment 2 - All Funds
Quarter 1 Budget Report
FUNDS

ORIGINAL
APPROP

REVISED
BUDGET YTD ACTUAL ENCUMB.

AVAILABLE
BUDGET
W/O
ENCUMB.
% USED
WITH
ENCUMB.
% USED
NOTES

USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - - - - OPER XFERS IN (152,897) (152,897) (152,897) - - - Total Revenue (152,897) (152,897) (152,897) - - PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 64,620 - (64,620) 100% 100% Total Expenditures - - 64,620 - (64,620) 100% 100% - -
6051-Police & Fire Pension
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - 1,762,205 - (1,762,205) 100% 100%

OPER XFERS IN - - - - - - Total Revenue - - 1,762,205 - (1,762,205) 100% 100% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 245,313 - (245,313) 100% 100% PROF & ADMIN - - 15,832 - (15,832) 100% 100% Total Expenditures - - 261,145 - (261,145) 100% 100% - - -
6052-Garfield Pension Fund
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY - - (2,751) - 2,751 100% 100% OPER XFERS IN (12,408) (12,408) (12,408) - - 100% 100% Total Revenue (12,408) (12,408) (15,159) - 2,751 122% 122% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT - - 13,268 - (13,268) 100% 100% Total Expenditures - - 13,268 - (13,268) 100% 100% Total Pension Trust Funds (165,305) (165,305) 1,594,149 - (1,759,454) -964% -964% Total Pension Trust Funds - - 339,032 - (339,032) 100% 100% 1,933,181
Total All Funds Revenue (386,217,869) (392,995,836) (66,562,236) - (161,661,798) 17% 17% Total All Funds Expenditure 439,115,245 489,393,337 90,540,654 53,894,905 174,978,946 19% 30%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
September 2022 - Period 3
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 %
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without % Estimated CAPITAL PROJECTS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Design Construction Completion Date Contingency/Other

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - CIP
13TH STREET COMPLETE STREET 1,161,526 90,185 377,471 693,870 8% 40% Dec-22 Spring 2023 Dec-23 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), SIDEWALKS, CURBS 546,920 99,906 116,844 330,170 18% 40% Ongoing Annual project APRA/MAIN LIBRARY 500,000 - 48, 000 452, 000 0% 10% D ec-22 Spring 2023 Dec-23 ARPA/NEVIN CENTER 489,750 - 39, 750 450, 000 0% 8% D ec-22 Spring 2023 Dec-23 ARPA/RECREATION CENTER 474,975 - 23, 975 451, 000 0% 5% D ec-22 Spring 2023 Dec-23 ARPA/RICHMOND MUSEUM 500,000 - 32, 600 467, 400 0% 7% D ec-22 Spring 2023 Dec-23 ATP QUICK BUILD CUTTING/HOFFMAN 625,212 - 412, 419 212, 793 0% 66% ATP QUICK BUILD HARBOUR WAY S. CYCLE TRACK 184,300 - 29, 579 154, 721 0% 16% HARBOUR WAY IMPROVEMENTS 82,500 - - 82, 500 0% 0% , , , BOORMAN PARK REVITALIZATION 3,987,457 985 656, 983 3, 329,489 0% 17% C ompleted Dec-23 Mitigation work on contaminated site BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 2,138,521 - 14, 378 2, 124,143 0% 1% C ompleted Spring 2023 Dec-23 Cleaning and sealing the bridge deck CARLSON BLVD. CROSSTOWN CONNECTIONS IMPROVEMENTS 421,268 - 201,669 219,599 0% 48% Work in progress Jun-23 CASTRO RANCH ROAD 477,335 - 477,335 - 0% 100% Mar-23 CORP YARD ROOF-BATHROOM REMODEL AND FUEL SITES UPGRADES 482,149 39,858 83, 149 359, 142 8% 26% 60% J un-23 Dec-23 Bathroom design is 60% completed.

Additional emergency funding of $1.3M is
needed to complete project

DEVELOPING PERSONAL RESOURCES CENTER (DPRC) ROOF
REPLACEMENT PROJECT 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% Dec-22 Emergency justification completed,
contacting contractor
FIRE STATION 66 - GENDER SPECIFIC RESTROOMS 275,052 - - 275,052 0% 0% Completed On hold for
additional
$500,000 in
funding TBD
Additional funding is needed for
construction of the gender specific
restroom
GREENWAY GAP AND CONNECTIVITY STUDY 149,926 28,045 121,881 1 19% 100% Study will be completed in February 2023 GREENWAY REHAB AND BIKE EDUCATION 127,310 - - 127,310 0% 0% This grant is for three projects – a small
construction project that has not yet been
designed; a bike education program with
Bike East Bay which has already begun;
and a Greenway maintenance program
with SOS! Richmond
GREENING THE YELOW BRICK ROAD 2,376,117 132,469 1,891,878 351,769 6% 85% Work in progress Spring 2023 Planting in progress, medians and trees
on 8th Street
HARBOUR 8 PARK EXTENSION 6,312,278 95,843 5,699,087 517,348 2% 92% In progress Dec-24 This will take a couple of years HARBOUR WAY & WRIGHT SECTION 130 1,199,075 - - 1, 199,075 0% 0% T BD TBD TBD HILLTOP FIRE STATION FUEL SYSTEM 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 0% On hold, funding may be needed for fuel
pumps at Corp Yard
I-80 CENTRAL INTERCHANGE PHASE II 2,385,476 - 186,464 2,199,012 0% 8% Dec-22 Spring 2023 Dec-23 Releasing environmental documents by
12/31/22
JPA SPORTS FIELD PARTNERSHIP 15,000 - - 15,000 0% 0% Annual payment for sports field
agreement
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. COMMUNITY CENTER 267,692 - - 267, 692 0% 0% O n hold, not enough funding MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. TURF FIELD REPLACEMENT 234,000 - - 234, 000 0% 0% C ompleted Completed Completed MEMBERSHIP & DUES CCTA and WCCTAC 200,000 - - 200, 000 0% 0% N /A Annual payment for WCCTAC and
CCTA dues
On hold for now - This is a combined project with multiple funding sources and is in need of an additional $150,000 for completion. ATP Quick Build Cutting/Hoffman, ATP Quick Build Harbour Way S. Cycle Track, Harbour Way Improvements and SB1 Cutting/Harbour Way S. Bikeway.

An additional $150,000 is needed for the original scope. The scope has been reduced to stay within current budget. The Public Utility Commission (PUC) is threatening to sue the city for illegal railroad crossings. Need to correct the railroad crossing and complete the Hoffman section to stay in compliance with grantor

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
September 2022 - Period 3
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 %
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without % Estimated CAPITAL PROJECTS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Design Construction Completion Date Contingency/Other NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 0% 6/30/2023 Replace Heating Ventilation and Air
Condition (HVAC) System
PARKS YARD FUEL SITE UPGRADES 220,000 - - 220,000 0% 0% Additional funding is needed SF BAY TRAIL- GOODRICK AVENUE 21,350 - 21,350 - 0% 100% Completed Completed Completed Project completed, will close PO to
remove encumbrance
SHIMADA PARK RESTROOM 246,690 360 213,315 33,015 0% 87% Work in progress Dec. 2022 Roof and ADA remodel SF BAY TRAIL- PT. MOLATE 1,019,967 - - 1,019,967 0% 0% Dec-22 Mar-23 Dec-23 March 2023 award contract STREET PAVING 2,546,167 466,085 1,079,287 1,000,795 18% 61% Work in progress San Pablo Ave. I-80 to El Cerrito city
limits (Bart), Nov 2023
STREET PAVING - SB1 - 37TH STREET 199,457 - 36, 915 162, 542 0% 19% C ompleted Completed Completed SB1 funded portion completed STREET PAVING - SB1 - CASTRO RANCH ROAD 593,346 483 267,560 325,304 0% 45% Completed Completed Completed SB1 funded portion completed STREET PAVING SB1 - MARINA WAY - WELLNESS TRAIL 65,820 1,890 4,284 59,646 3% 9% TBD TBD TBD STREET PAVING - SBI - RICHMOND PARKWAY 1,000,000 - 5,356 994,644 0% 1% Completed Completed Completed STREET REPORT - AUDIT 4,000 - - 4, 000 0% 0% N /A Annual payment for street audit report SURFACE DRAINAGE 300,000 - - 300,000 0% 0% Annual allocation This project is weather driven, will pickup
in winter
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 411,173 8,243 142,086 260,844 2% 37% Annual allocation Speed humps have been requested YELLOW BRICK ROAD 1,904,636 340,070 243,369 1,321,197 18% 31% Dec. 2022 Waiting on PG&E service connections TOTAL - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CIP 35,212,267 1,304,422 13, 212,280 20, 695,566 4% 41%

PUBLIC WORKS - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY WASTEWATER - CIP COGENERATION 2,337,865 4,079 872,506 1,461,280 0% 37% Work in progress Spring 2023 Dec-23 DECLORINATION SODIUM BISULFITE TANK (SBS) 5,797,412 2,107,923 439,489 3,250,000 36% 44% Completed Work in progress Jun-23 DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 516,775 - 516,775 - 0% 100% DESIGN CUTTING, CARLSON & HOFFMAN 709,409 6,922 702,487 - 1% 100% Completed Completed Completed Waiting on as-built plant DORNAN DRIVE FORCE MAIN REHABILITATION 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 0% 0% Dec. 2022 Summer 2023 Dec-23 FERRY POINT DORNAN DRIVE PUMP STATION 3,339,991 88,773 3,029,971 221,247 3% 93% Completed Work in progress Dec-23 FIRST & BISSEL SEWER REHAB 10,433 - 10,433 - 0% 100% Completed Waiting on as-built plant FIRST STREET WET WEATHER 221,248 - 221,248 - 0% 100% Work in progress Dec-23 FLEET REPLACEMENT/OTHER EQUIPMENT 1,569,907 - 1,054,907 515,000 0% 67% N/A Vactor trucks GRIT AND AERATION REPLACEMENT 37,139,075 1,413,954 15,725,121 20,000,000 4% 46% Work in progress Dec-23 MACDONALD & VIRGINIA SEWER CAPACITY 80,568 976 79,593 - 1% 100% Completed Completed Completed MARINA BAY PARKWAY FORCE MAIN RELOCATION 414,608 - 64,608 350,000 0% 16% Completed, additional work needed and
is separate change order to add another
segment in Spring 2023
PIPELINE REHAB & REPLACEMENT 674,172 89,594 584,579 - 13% 100% Ongoing SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS /BRICK MANHOLE REHAB 794,130 - - 794,130 0% 0% Jun-23 Jul-23 Dec-23 SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS 4,058,835 1,956 731,879 3,325,000 0% 18% Work in progress Jan-23 Jun-23 SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS POINT REPAIR 475,212 - 212 475,000 0% 0% Ongoing STORMWATER GRANT 1,598,844 - - 1,598,844 0% 0% SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISTION (SCADA) UPGRADES 126,276 95,855 30,422 - 76% 100% Completed Completed 6/30/2023 WWTP SEISMIC RETROFITS 348,443 - 23,443 325,000 0% 7% Jun-23 Studies will be completed in December
2023
WWTP SLUDGE THICKENER 1,146,440 70,575 445,804 630,061 6% 45% 50% Dec-23 Construction is 50% completed TOTAL - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY WASTEWATER CIP 65,359,644 3,880,605 24, 533,477 36, 945,562 6% 43%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
September 2022 - Period 3
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 %
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without % Estimated CAPITAL PROJECTS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Design Construction Completion Date Contingency/Other

POLICE DEPARTMENT - CIP
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 20,000 - - 20, 000 0% 0% N /A TOTAL - POLICE DEPARTMENT CIP 20,000 - - 20, 000 0% 0%

COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - CIP
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) BOOKER T. ANDERSON (BTA) 485,000 - 119, 348 365, 652 0% 25% W ork in progress Jan-23 Jun-23

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) PARCHESTER CENTER 496,314 49,536 143,808 302,970 10% 39% Work in progress Dec-22 AUDITORIUM CONVENTION CENTER UPGRADES 913,638 1,930 413,753 497,955 0% 45% 50% Dec-22 Construction is 50% complete RECREATION COMPLEX HVAC 120,000 - - 120,000 0% 0% 22-Dec Spring 2023 Dec-23 SHIELDS-REID COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC SYSTEM UPGRADE 132,850 - 5,600 127,250 0% 4% 22-Dec Spring 2023 Dec-23 TOTAL - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CIP 2,147,802 51,466 682,509 1,413,827 2% 34%

LIBRARY DEPARTMENT - CIP

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) RAMP MAIN LIBRARY STAFF ENTRANCE 30,000 - - 30,000 0% 0% TBD, this will be part of the recently
awarded $9M grant for the Library
BOOKMOBILE - NEW 70,000 - - 70, 000 0% 0% T BD DELIVERY VAN - NEW 70,000 - - 70, 000 0% 0% T BD TOTAL - LIBRARY DEPARTMENT CIP 170,000 - - 170, 000 0% 0%

PORT OF RICHMOND - CIP
BERTH ELECTRIFICATIONS 750,000 - - 750,000 0% 0% Dec-23 Working with City Attorney, Request for
Proposal (RFP) is in progress, have to
deliver by November 2024, work will be
start in January, 2023, takes up to 10
months, December 23, is the estimated
completion
PPMT ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% Jun-23 Will be working on in April 23, estimated
completion by June 30, 2023
PPMT GENERAL UPGRADES 250,000 - - 250,000 0% 0% Mar-23 Commencing in October 2022, contract
for $64K is awarded, other contracts are
being awarded, Completed by march 23
TERMINAL 4 WHARF REMOVAL 3,401,288 - 713,972 2,687,316 0% 21% Dec-23 Consultant is providing plan now, Q1 23
estimated to start, It may be completed
by December 23
TOTAL - PORT OF RICHMOND CIP 4,501,288 - 713, 972 3, 787,316 0% 16%

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - CIP
AREA FM CAP 929,161 - - 929, 161 0% 0% City’s contracted Engineer and
Environmental Geologist completed draft
Grading Plan and submitted to DTSC.

D
TSC Geologist and State Project
Manager have reviewed and returned
document with comments by the end of
October, 2022.

C
ity Staff, contracted
Engineer and Geologist will incorporate
State DTSC comments and ready the
bid for Site Grading Work.

B
id packet is
expected to be ready winter of 2022 and
grading work planned by Spring 2023.

C
ity continues to rent fencing to provide
additional site security and provides
monthly reports to State DTSC
Regulator.

TOTAL - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CIP 929,161 - - 929, 161 0% 0%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
September 2022 - Period 3
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 %
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without % Estimated CAPITAL PROJECTS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Design Construction Completion Date Contingency/Other

KCRT CABLE TELEVISION - CIP
ENGINEERING; (Microwave Transmission & Playback System) 120,000 11,673 - 108,327 10% 10% TBD TOTAL - KCRT CIP 120,000 11,673 - 108, 327 10% 10%

PUBLIC WORKS - EQUIPMENT SERVICES AND REPLACEMENT - CIP FIRE VEHICLES 875,000 - 23, 753 851, 247 0% 3% OTHER CITY EQUIPMENT 100,000 - - 100, 000 0% 0% OTHER CITY VEHICLES 3,818,831 - 513, 831 3, 305,000 0% 13% POLICE VEHICLES 1,676,413 - 225, 413 1, 451,000 0% 13% TOTAL - EQUIPMENT SERVICES CIP 6,470,244 - 762,998 5,707,247 0% 12% Equipment purchases delayed due to
nationwide supply chain problems
GRAND TOTAL 114,930,406 5,248,166 39, 905,236 69, 777,005 5% 39%

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
Period 3 - September 2022
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 PCT Used 25.00%
BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without %
NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Notes 1002 - GAS TAX
REVENUE (3,203,193) (541,666) - (2,661,527) 17% 17% Gas Tax revenue is through 8/23/22 ADA MISCELLANEOUS SIDEWALK REHAB 36,105 - - 36,105 0% 0% BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 248,340 - - 248,340 0% 0% GREENWAY REHAB AND BIKE EDUCATION 27,310 - - 27,310 0% 0% STREET AUDIT REPORT 4,000 - - 4,000 0% 0% STREET PAVING 2,546,167 466,085 1,079,287 1,000,795 18% 61% Multi PO's encumbered for equipment rental,
asphalt materials and supplies to support the
street paving program
TOTAL - STATE GAS TAX - EXPENSES 2,861,922 466,085 1,079,287 1,316,550 16% 54% 1004 - ASSET SEIZURE
REVENUE (20,000) (66) - (19,934) 0% 0% Asset Seizure revenue is unpredictable MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES SAFETY EQUIPMENT 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 0% TOTAL - ASSET SEIZURE - EXPENSES 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 0% 1006 - OUTSIDE FUNDED GRANTS
REVENUE (3,635,288) - - (3,635,288) 0% 0% Grant reimbursements happen after expense
occurs
MLK PARK FIELD TURF 234,000 - - 234,000 0% 0% TERMINAL 4 WHARF REMOVAL 3,401,288 - 713,972 2,687,316 0% 21% TOTAL - OUTSIDE FUNDED GRANTS - EXPENSES 3,635,288 - 713,972 2,921,316 0% 20% 1019 - ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) SB1 REVENUE (2,510,376) (193,736) - (2,316,640) 8% 8% SB1 funding delayed due to timing of filing annual
report. Entire revenue budget is expected soon
STREET PAVING - SB1 - 37TH STREET 199,457 - 36,915 162,542 0% 19% STREET PAVING - SB1 - CASTRO RANCH ROAD 593,346 483 267,560 325,304 0% 45% Prior year PO carry-forward with Ghilotti Bros for
construction work on Castro Ranch Rd. Project
STREET PAVING SB1 CUTTING/HARBOUR WAY S. B 865,822 - 785,296 80,526 0% 91% PO encumbered with WR Forde for work on the
Cutting/Harbour Way S. Project
STREET PAVING SB1 - MARINA WAY - WELLNESS T 65,820 1,890 4,284 59,646 3% 9% STREET PAVING - SB1 - RICHMOND PARKWAY 1,000,000 - 5,356 994,644 0% 1% TOTAL - RMRA - EXPENSES 2,724,446 2,373 1,099,412 1,622,661 0% 40% 1054 - ENGINEERING GRANTS
REVENUE (14,509,778) - - (14,509,778) 0% 0% Grant reimbursements happen after expense
occurs
ATP QUICK BUILD CUTTING/HOFFMAN 625,212 - 412,419 212,793 0% 66% PO encumbered with WR Forde for work on the
Cutting/Hoffman Cycle Track Project
ATP QUICK BUILD HARBOUR WAY S. CYCLE TRACK 184,300 - 29,579 154,721 0% 16% BOORMAN PARK REVITALIZATION 3,987,457 985 656,983 3,329,489 0% 17% BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 1,890,181 - 14,378 1,875,803 0% 1% CASTRO RANCH ROAD 477,335 - 477,335 - 0% 100% Prior year PO carry-forward with Ghilotti Bros for
construction work on Castro Ranch Rd. Project
CARLSON BLVD. CROSSTOWN CONNECTIONS & IM 421,268 - 201,669 219,599 0% 48% PO encumbered with Nema Construction for work o GREENING THE YELOW BRICK ROAD 2,376,117 132,469 1,891,878 351,769 6% 85% Prior year PO carry-forward with POGO Park for
work on Greening the Yellow Brick Rd. Project
GREENWAY GAP AND CONNECTIVITY STUDY 149,926 28,045 121,881 100% 119% 100% Prior year PO carry-forward with Civicwell for work
on the Greenway Gap Connectivity Project
GREENWAY REHAB AND BIKE EDUCATION 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% HARBOUR 8 PARK EXTENSION 6,312,278 95,843 5,699,087 517,348 2% 92% PO encumbered with POGO Park for design and
build work on the Harbour 8 Park Extension
Project

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
Period 3 - September 2022
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 PCT Used 25.00%
BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without %
NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Notes HARBOUR WAY & WRIGHT SECTION 130 1,199,075 - - 1,199,075 0% 0% HARBOUR WAY IMPROVEMENTS 82,500 - - 82,500 0% 0% PO encumbered with WR Forde for work on the
Harbour Way Cycle Track Project
YELLOW BRICK ROAD 368,644 248,188 112,211 8,245 67% 98% Multiple PO's carried-forward for work on the
Yellow Brick Rd. Project
TOTAL - ENGINEERING GRANTS - EXPENSES 18,174,293 505,531 9,617,420 8,051,343 3% 56% 1306 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA)
REVENUE (2,770,400) (13,870,362) - 11,099,962 501% 501% ARPA projects are funded by fund balance APRA/MAIN LIBRARY 500,000 - 48,000 452,000 0% 10% ARPA/NEVIN CENTER 489,750 - 39,750 450,000 0% 8% ARPA/RECREATION CENTER 474,975 - 23,975 451,000 0% 5% ARPA/RICHMOND MUSEUM 500,000 - 32,600 467,400 0% 7% TOTAL - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) - E 1,964,725 - 144,325 1,820,400 100% 100% 2001 - GENERAL CAPITAL
REVENUE - (443) - 443 100% 100% General Capital projects are funded by fund balance AUDITORIUM UPGRADES (Main floor lighting,
electrical & switch board upgrade, and remove curtains
from stage area) 913,638 1,930 413,753 497,955 0% 45% Prior year PO carried-forward with Pro-CAL
Lighting Inc. for work on the Auditorium Lighting
Project

CORP YARD ROOF-BATHROOM REMODEL AND
FUEL SITES UPGRADES 482,149 39,858 83,149 359,142 8% 26% Prior year PO carried0forward with Oakley &
Oakley for Corp Yard Fuel Tank Upgrade Project

DEVELOPING PERSONAL RESOURCES CENTER
(DPRC) ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% FIRE STATION 66 - GENDER SPECIFIC RESTROOMS 275,052 - - 275,052 0% 0% HILLTOP FIRE STATION FUEL SYSTEM 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 0% MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. CENTER 267,692 - - 267,692 0% 0% NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 0% PARKS YARD FUEL SITE UPGRADES 220,000 - - 220,000 0% 0% RECREATION COMPLEX HVAC 120,000 - - 120,000 0% 0% SF BAY TRAIL - (PT. RICHMOND TO PT. MOLATE) 646,703 - - 646,703 0% 0% SHIELDS-REID COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC SYSTE 132,850 - 5,600 127,250 0% 4% SHIMADA PARK RESTROOM 246,690 360 213,315 33,015 0% 87% PO encumbered with DMR Builders to replace roof a TOTAL - GENERAL CAPITAL - EXPENSES 3,504,774 42,148 715,817 2,746,809 1% 22% 2002 - MEASURE J
REVENUE (4,292,882) - - (4,292,882) 0% 0% Measure J revenue budget is for 13th St., I-80
Interchange Projects, plus the annual allotment of
$1.3M
13TH STREET COMPLETE STREET 1,161,526 90,185 377,471 693,870 8% 40% PO encumbered with Nichols Consulting
Engineering for design work on the 13th Street
Project
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), SIDEW 510,815 99,906 116,844 294,065 20% 42% Multiple PO's carried-forward for work on the ADA
Sidewalk Project
I-80 CENTRAL INTERCHANGE PHASE II 2,385,476 - 186,464 2,199,012 0% 8% MEMBERSHIP & DUES CCTA and WCCTAC 200,000 - - 200,000 0% 0% SF BAY TRAIL - GOODRICK AVE 21,350 - 21,350 - 0% 100% Prior year PO carried-forward for closeout of
outstanding invoices
SURFACE DRAINAGE 300,000 - - 300,000 0% 0% TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 40,739 1,100 39,639 - 3% 100% Multiple PO's carried-forward for work on the
Traffic Safety Improvements Project
TOTAL - MEASURE J - EXPENSES 4,619,906 191,191 741,767 3,686,947 4% 20% 2110 - PARK IMPACT FEE
REVENUE - (5,364) - -

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
Period 3 - September 2022
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 PCT Used 25.00%
BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without %
NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Notes JPA SPORTS FIELD PARTNERSHIP 15,000 - - 15,000 0% 0% TOTAL - PARK IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 15,000 - - 15,000 0% 0% 2111 - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TOTAL REVENUE - (26,376) - - TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 370,434 7,143 102,447 260,844 2% 30% Multiple PO's carried-forward for work on the
Traffic Safety Improvements Project
TOTAL - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 370,434 7,143 102,447 260,844 2% 30% 2116 - OPEN SPACE IMPACT FEE
REVENUE - (95,305) - - SF BAY TRAIL - (PT. RICHMOND TO PT. MOLATE) 373,264 - - 373,264 0% 0% TOTAL - OPENSPACE IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 373,264 - - 373,264 0% 0% 2117 - LIBRARY IMPACT FEE
REVENUE (250,000) - - (250,000) 0% 0% Administrative adjustment will correct in period 3 ADA RAMP MAIN LIBRARY STAFF ENTRANCE 30,000 - - 30,000 0% 0% BOOKMOBILE - NEW 70,000 - - 70,000 0% 0% DELIVERY VAN - NEW 70,000 - - 70,000 0% 0% TOTAL - LIBRARY IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 170,000 - - 170,000 0% 0% 2120 - WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE
TOTAL REVENUE - (25,110) - 25,110 COGENERATION 842,391 4,079 838,312 - 0% 100% PO encumbered with Veolia for work on the
Cogeneration Project
SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS /BRICK MANHOLE REH 794,130 - - 794,130 0% 0% TOTAL - WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE - EXPENSES 1,636,521 4,079 838,312 794,130 0% 51% (445,574) (1,105,433) (927,905) (883,724) TOTAL - REVENUE - CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS (30,941,917) (14,605,829) - (16,336,088) 47% 47% TOTAL - EXPENSES - CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS 40,070,572 1,218,550 15,052,759 23,799,264 3% 41% 1017 - ECIA DEPARTMENT
YELLOW BRICK ROAD 1,535,992 91,881 131,158 1,312,952 6% 15% TOTAL - ECIA DEPARTMENT 1,535,992 91,881 131,158 1,312,952 6% 15% 1201 - HOUSING DEPARTMENT - CDBG
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) BOOKE 485,000 - 119,348 365,652 0% 25% AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) PARCHE 496,314 49,536 143,808 302,970 10% 39% PO encumbered with Oleg Kovrizhuyku for ADA
improvements at Parchester Community Center
TOTAL - HOUSING DEPARTMENT - ADA 981,314 49,536 263,156 668,622 5% 32% 4001 - PORT CIP
BERTH ELECTRIFICATIONS 750,000 - - 750,000 0% 0% PPMT ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% PPMT GENERAL UPGRADES 250,000 - - 250,000 0% 0% TOTAL - PORT CIP 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 0% 0% 4003 - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY WASTEWATER CIP
COGENERATION 1,495,474 - 34,194 1,461,280 0% 2% DECLORINATION SODIUM BISULFITE TANK (SBS) 5,797,412 2,107,923 439,489 3,250,000 36% 44% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP

City of Richmond
FY2022-23
Period 3 - September 2022
Attachment 3 - Capital Improvement Projects
Quarter 1 Report
REVISED 9/30/2022 PCT Used 25.00%
BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE without %
NON-GENERAL FUND - PROJECT FUNDS FY2022-23 FY2022-23 ENCUMB REMAINING ENCUMB USED Notes DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 516,775 - 516,775 - 0% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
DESIGN CUTTING, CARLSON & HOFFMAN 709,409 6,922 702,487 - 1% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
DORNAN DRIVE FORCE MAIN REHABILITATION 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 0% 0% FERRY POINT DORNAN DRIVE PUMP STATION 3,339,991 88,773 3,029,971 221,247 3% 93% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
FIRST & BISSEL SEWER REHAB 10,433 - 10,433 - 0% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
FIRST STREET WET WEATHER 221,248 - 221,248 - 0% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
FLEET REPLACEMENT/OTHER EQUIPMENT 1,569,907 - 1,054,907 515,000 0% 67% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
GRIT AND AERATION REPLACEMENT 37,139,075 1,413,954 15,725,121 20,000,000 4% 46% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
MACDONALD & VIRGINIA SEWER CAPACITY 80,568 976 79,593 - 1% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
MARINA BAY PARKWAY FORCE MAIN RELOCATION 414,608 - 64,608 350,000 0% 16% PIPELINE REHAB & REPLACEMENT 674,172 89,594 584,579 - 13% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS 4,058,835 1,956 731,879 3,325,000 0% 18% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS POINT REPAIR 475,212 - 212 475,000 0% 0% STORMWATER GRANT 1,598,844 - - 1,598,844 0% 0% SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISTION 126,276 95,855 30,422 - 76% 100% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
WWTP SEISMIC RETROFITS 348,443 - 23,443 325,000 0% 7% WWTP SLUDGE THICKENER 1,146,440 70,575 445,804 630,061 6% 45% Multiple PO's encumbered with Veolia for work on
Wastewater CIP
TOTAL - WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY WASTEW 63,723,123 3,876,526 23,695,165 36,151,432 6% 43% 4005 - MARINA
AREA FM CAP 929,161 - - 929,161 0% 0% TOTAL - MARINA CIP 929,161 - - 929,161 0% 0% 4008 - KCRT
ENGINEERING; (Microwave Transmission & Playback S 120,000 11,673 - 108,327 10% 10% TOTAL - KCRT CIP 120,000 11,673 - 108,327 10% 10% 5003 - EQUIPMENT SERVICES CIP
FIRE VEHICLES 875,000 - 23,753 851,247 0% 3% OTHER CITY VEHICLES 3,818,831 - 513,831 3,305,000 0% 13% POLICE VEHICLES 1,676,413 - 225,413 1,451,000 0% 13% OTHER CITYEQUIPMENT 100,000 - - 100,000 0% 0% TOTAL - EQUIPMENT SERVICES CIP 6,470,244 - 762,998 5,707,247 0% 12% TOTAL - EXPENSES - ENTERPRISE AND OTHER OP 74,859,834$ 4,029,616$ 24,852,477$ 45,977,741$ 5% 39% GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES - ALL FUNDS 114,930,406$ 5,248,166$ 39,905,236$ 69,777,005$ 5% 39%

Reso. No.

RESOLUTION NO. XX-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 FIRST QUARTER BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1(b) of Article IV of the Richmond City Charter the City Manager is required to prepare an annual budget for the review and approval by the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the City’s budget was originally adopted on June 21, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City’s first quarter budget report is received to monitor budget to actual trends between the time period of July 1, 2022 and September 30, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed budget adjustments in the quarter budget report and at a public meeting on November 22, 2022; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Richmond, California hereby adopts the resolution to approve the proposed budget adjustments the Table 1.

Table 1: Non-General Fund Budget Adjustments

**********************

I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held November 22, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

Fund Fund Description
Expense
Adjustments
Increase/
(Decrease) Justification
1306 America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 296,330
American Rescue Plan Act – the City staff is proposing to appropriate $296,300 for the Environmental Planning. The project was appropriated in the FY2021-22 budget;
however, the appropriation was inadvertently not included in the FY2022-23 budget that was approved on June 21,
2023.
1306 America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 1,000,000
American Rescue Plan Act – the City staff is proposing to appropriate $1,000,000 for the Community Beautification Project. The project was appropriated in the FY2021-22
budget; however, the appropriation was inadvertently not included in the FY2022-23 budget that was approved on
June 21, 2023.
1306 America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 150,000
American Rescue Plan Act – the City staff is proposing to appropriate $150,000 for MLK Turf Field. The project was appropriated in the FY2021-22 budget; however, the
appropriation was inadvertently not included in the FY2022- 23 budget that was approved on June 21, 2023.
4003 Wastewater (1,598,844)
Wastewater Fund 4003 – the City staff is requesting to
remove the Flood Risk Reduction Rheem Creek grant
budget. The Grant is already budgeted in the Stromwater fund and this appropriation is redundant.
2002 Measure J 600,000
Measure J – the revenue exceeded by $600,000 than the
original budget, the City staff is proposing to appropriate Net Impact 447,486

Reso. No.

ABSENT:

PAMELA CHRISTIAN

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

THOMAS K. BUTT
Mayor

Approved as to form:

DAVE ALESHIRE
City Attorney

State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. XX-22, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on November 22, 2022.

Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond

Fiscal Year 2022-23 First Quarter Budget Report
Richmond City Council Meeting
Finance Department
November 22, 2022

Recommended Action:

RECEIVE the FY 2022-23’s first quarter budget
report for the period of July 1, 2022, through
September 30, 2022, and APPROVE proposed
Budget Adjustments.
2

Agenda
• FY 2022-23 First Quarter Budget Report
▫ General Fund Revenues
▫ General Fund Expenditures
▫ Non-General Fund Revenues
▫ Non-General Fund Expenditures
▫ Capital Improvement Projects Highlights
• Budget Adjustments
• Labor Negotiations and Looming Recession
• Next Steps
• Questions
3

General Fund Revenues
4

General Fund Expenditures
5

Non-General Fund Revenues
6

Non-General Fund Expenditures
7

Capital Improvement Projects Highlights
• Castro Ranch Road
• Grit and Aeration Replacement
• Richmond Parkway
• Street Paving
• Yellow Brick Road
8

Budget Adjustments
9

Labor Negotiations and Looming Recession
• The City is in the middle of labor negotiations with
several bargaining units regarding labor contracts and
the implementation of the Classification and
Compensation study. the results of the negotiations
will impact the expenditure trends in the next three
quarters.
• Global economy is also indicating the early signs of
recession in the calendar year of 2023. Due to these
pressures on the City’s expenditures and revenues,
there is a great deal of potential for fiscal headwinds in the coming years that could deplete the City’s reserves. 10

Next Steps
The City staff will continue to closely
monitor the revenues and expenditure
trends in the current fiscal year to
determine if adjustments will need to
be made during the mid-year budget
review.
11

December 6, 2022 Page 1 of 3

Community Development

DATE: December 6, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM:

Lina Velasco, Director of Community Development
Eva Mann, Code Enforcement Manager

Subject:

Levy of Special Assessments for Fines and Costs
Related to Unpaid Administrative Citations, Nuisance
Abatements and Foreclosure Ordinance Fines
FINANCIAL IMPACT: This action will enable the City of Richmond to collect outstanding receivables against the subject properties
totaling $770,972.82. These fees will off-set general fund expenditures related to Code Enforcement staffing and
operations.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

Click or tap here to enter text.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City Council must hold a public hearing and approve a resolution to initiate the process of levying special assessments to recover fines and costs for issuing
administrative citations, nuisance abatement costs, and foreclosure fines for the time period of May 1, 2020,
through April 30, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: HOLD a public hearing; and ADOPT a resolution authorizing the City of Richmond to levy special
assessments against certain properties with unpaid
invoices related to administrative citations, nuisance
abatement costs, and foreclosure ordinance fines
pursuant to Richmond Municipal Code Chapters 2.62,

2.63, 6.38, 9.22 and 11.76 – Community Development,
Code Enforcement (Lina Velasco/Eva Mann 510-621-
1283).

AGENDA
REPORT

December 6, 2022 Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION:

Richmond Municipal Code (“RMC”) Chapters 9.22.100, 2.62, and 2.63 authorizes the City of Richmond to levy special assessment liens against properties for failure to pay administrative fines, costs of abatement, and foreclosure fines including those imposed pursuant to RMC Chapters 11.76 and 6.38. Recoverable costs include those related to unpaid administrative citations, non-compliance fees, nuisance abatements, and foreclosure ordinance fines. The properties with outstanding fees are provided in Exhibit A of the attached Resolution. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 lien list was delayed to allow additional time for property owners to pay outstanding fines and fees due to the significant loss of jobs and uncertainty related to the pandemic.

Therefore, the proposed list covers the time period of May 1, 2020, through April 30, 2022.

RMC Section 9.22.110(d) allows that, on a periodic basis, the City Manager or their designee to prepare and file with the City Clerk a report and assessment list which identifies all real property at which abatement work was done by the City and for which the owner has not fully reimbursed the City, within 30 days of the date of billing for work performed. The report and assessment list is required to provide a description of the real property at which the work was performed, the expenses incurred by the Ci ty and the names and addresses of the persons entitled to notice, as identified in RMC Section 9.22.100 (c). The list in Exhibit A of the attached Resolution includes these properties with outstanding abatement work fees .

Any owner who objects to the proposed assessment and who desires to challenge the proposed assessment at the City Council hearing must submit all objections in writing to the City Clerk at least one day prior to the date of hearing (by December 5, 2022) . A notice of the public hearing and the obligation of the owner to notify the City Clerk of their objection of the proposed assessment, in writing, was mailed to all owners on the list by the City Clerk. The failure of any owner to submit objections to the City Clerk, in writing, shall constitute a waiver of any such objections. [RMC Section 9.22.110(f)] At the City Council hearing, only those persons who have submitted wri tten objections to the City Clerk will be heard by the City Council. At the hearing, which constitutes the appeal hearing, the City Council may correct, modify , or eliminate any proposed assessment which it may deem excessive or otherwise incorrect. Therea fter, by vote and resolution, the City Council shall confirm each assessment and the amount thereof, as proposed or as corrected and modified, and order that an assessment be made as a personal obligation of the owner or, alternatively, assess it against t he property. [RMC Section 9.22.110(g)]
The unpaid code enforcement fines may include administrative costs, the costs of City staff to abate the violations, and unpaid citations, to be assessed (levied) against the listed properties. When these charges remain unpaid for 30 days after the property owner is invoiced, the charges may become a lien on each parcel of land, collectible in the same manner as other municipal taxes. As part of the process to recover unpaid fees, City staff issued final invoices to owners notifying them of the City’s intent to levy

December 6, 2022 Page 3 of 3
the property if fees are not paid. Those that fail to pay the outstanding fees and fines by the listed date in the final invoice are listed in Exhibit A and are recommended to be levied.

The imposed fees and/or fines shown in Exhibit A, Receivables for Unpaid Code Enforcement Fines, have not been paid by the property owners for the time period of May 1, 202, through April 30, 2022. There are a total of 133 properties on the proposed lien list totaling $770,972.83.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 - Resolution
Exhibit A - Receivables for Unpaid Code Enforcement Fines

RESOLUTION NO. -2022

RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON PROPERTIES IN THE

CITY OF RICHMOND, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A”, WHICH INCLUDES RECEIVABLES FOR FINES AND

COSTS RELATED TO UNPAID ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS, NUISANCE

ABATEMENTS, AND FORECLOSURE ORDINANCE FINES

WHEREAS, the properties which are described in EXHIBIT “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are located in the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Richmond Municipal Code Section(s) 2.62,

2.63, 6.38.140, 9.22.110 9.50.110, and 11.76.110, the Code Enforcement Division notified in writing the owner(s) of said properties of conditions constituting a public nuisance and requested the owner to abate said conditions, as required by the said code section(s); and

WHEREAS, certain owners of said properties failed to abate a public nuisance on their property as required by Richmond Municipal Code section 2.62, section 2.63, section 6.38.140, section 9.22.110, section 9.50.110 or section 11.76.110; and certain others have failed to pay fines and fees associated with said property; and

WHEREAS, the City of Richmond incurred charges as enumerated in EXHIBIT “A,” in which amounts remain unpaid; and

WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the City of Richmond held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the assessment list and provide owners of said property an opportunity to object to said assessment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Richmond Municipal Code Section(s) 2.62, 2.63, 6.38.140, 9.22.110, 9.50.110 or 11.76.110 the Council of the City of Richmond does hereby levy a special assessment against each of said properties in the amounts applicable to each specific property identified in EXHIBIT “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the Finance Director of the City of Richmond and that the Finance Director is authorized and directed to collect this sum in the manner provided by law for collection of special assessments/liens. When collected, these funds shall be credited to GF-PLN/Code Enforcement Division. Account(s): 01163019-340441.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the City of Richmond is hereby directed to cause this resolution to be recorded with the Recorder’s Office of the County of Contra Costa, California.

---------------------------------------------

I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held on December 6, 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstentions:

Absent:

___________________________

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(Seal)

Approved:

_____________________
Mayor

Approved as to form:

___________________________
City Attorney

Case No Site Address Site APN Owner Name Address Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Lien Amount 1 CE20-000495 5008 NUNN ST 513-237-002-3 LEWIS JAMES JR & EILEEN 5008 NUNN ST RICHMOND CA 94804 2,775 2 CE20-000557 621 S 52ND ST 513-236-005-7 NANCE THATCHER P JR 118 CARMEL ST SAN PABLO CA 94806 6,816.40 3 CE20-000567 10 1ST ST 538-350-037-7 ROYTMAN LAURA 2643 APPIAN WAY PINOLE CA 94564 6,900 4 CE20-000576 4500 MACDONALD AVE 517-290-010-1 TARGET CORPORATION PO BOX 9456 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440-9456 3,600 5 CE20-000577 661 S 31ST ST 549-203-015-9 TOBAR ERNESTO W/ TOBAR JOSE N RIVAS 836 38TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 3,600 6 CE20-000579 724 CHESLEY AVE 561-251-013-0 MAYS SYE E TRE 2301 STONEPATH WAY PFLUGERVILLE TX 78660 6,050 7 CE20-000587 421 BISSELL AVE 538-210-015-3 MERCADO MAGDA Z / MERCADO MAURILLO 2643 APPIAN WAY PINOLE CA 94564 2,750 8 CE20-000597 626 5TH ST 534-201-025-2 PAVLOVSKY ALEX 3220 BLUME DR RICHMOND CA 94806 2,750 9 CE21-000011 10733 SAN PABLO AVE 508-291-032-3 BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC 200 4TH AVE S NASHVILLE TN 37201 3,525.20 10 CE21-000018 12915 SAN PABLO AVE #29 526-050-008-6 RICHMOND LAUNDRY ACQ LLC 12020 GARFIELD AVE SOUTH GATE CA 90280 3,050 11 CE21-000059 1533 27TH ST 527-071-005-5 ROSE KEITH F 1533 27TH ST RICHMOND CA 94806 3,050 12 CE21-000061 615 S 31ST ST 549-203-018-3 FOCUS GROUP VENTURES LLC 1564-A FITZGERALD DR PINOLE CA 94564 2,775 13 CE21-000076 5620 CENTRAL AVE 510-053-032-7 AFFORDABLE HSNG LAND CONSULTS LLC PO BOX 260770 ENCINO CA 91426 10,500.30 14 CE21-000080 535 33RD ST 516-040-009-8 NISHIMATSU VIVIAN PO BOX 2912 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94126 4,425 15 CE21-000118 3901 OHIO AVE 513-072-001-3 SAIPRASERT SEE KWAY 4989 SANTA RITA RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 3,975.10 16 CE21-000152 896 CARLSON BLVD 509-390-009-9 GIBSON DERRICK 896 CARLSON BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 9,125.30 17 CE21-000167 3531 CENTER AVE 513-044-019-0 MASON THELMA 3531 CENTER AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 6,341.61 18 CE21-000212 5301 GATELY AVE 509-220-025-1 XU ZHI C / WANG DAHE 2575 30TH AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 6,650.30 19 CE21-000217 S 52ND ST 513-235-008-2 WHITE LEWIS H & ELMA RUTH PO BOX 773 LAFAYETTE CA 94549 2,875.10 20 CE21-000223 S 17TH ST 544-332-030-3 TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO 6120 SHATTUCK AVE OAKLAND CA 94609 4,834.56 21 CE21-000232 126 S 35TH ST 513-044-001-8 MARQUEZ DANIEL PENA 126 S 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 5,175.20 22 CE21-000234 609 S 52ND ST 513-236-003-2 JENKINS DOROTHY L 609 S 52ND ST RICHMOND CA 94804 5,175.20 23 CE21-000240 433 S 9TH ST 550-252-022-3 NEAL ROBERT/ NEAL MIRIAM 433 S 9TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 3,050 24 CE21-000263 4117 LEKE WAY 408-032-020-5 WALKER MATTHEW 4117 LEKE WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 5,366.89 25 CE21-000293 609 WILLIAMS DR 408-052-011-9 RUBIN ZANA/WEST VANESSA 609 WILLIAMS DR RICHMOND CA 94806 3,050 26 CE21-000296 2630 GAYNOR AVE 528-220-005-3 SABIN DON 2415 OLIVERA RD #4 CONCORD CA 94520 4,680.41 27 CE21-000321 2425 SAN JOAQUIN ST 510-093-028-7 PAYSINGER LORENE TRE 2320 ALVA AVE EL CERRITO CA 94530 3,150.10 28 CE21-000326 849 HUMBOLDT ST 523-034-009-2 PEARCE EMAGER 6145 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94618 3,050 29 CE21-000333 1320 CHERRY ST 561-262-003-8 EVANS ALVIN 1000 MACDONALD AVE #APT 211 RICHMOND CA 94801 3,325 30 CE21-000347 2810 CENTER AVE 513-025-013-6 MOORE ROBERT BURNS & GWEN ANN 626 35TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 9,331 31 CE21-000351 4923 POTRERO AVE 513-396-046-7 WARD JAMES EDWARD / PARKER KENDRA 4923 POTRERO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 9,025.20 32 CE21-000353 145 S 35TH ST 513-047-011-4 CHENG BETTY 173 GRANADA AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 5,175.20 33 CE21-000389 434 BISSELL AVE 538-310-005-3 FRY NOLIA M 168 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 3,050 34 CE21-000414 E RICHMOND AVE 556-170-001-3 BURLINGTON NO & SANTA FE RWY 2650 LOU MENK DR FORT WORTH TX 76131 6,075 35 CE21-000426 400 36TH ST 516-090-015-4 KAVATE MICHAEL & ROSHNI 400 36TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 3,325 36 CE21-000516 2520 OHIO AVE 513-023-003-9 ACPC2 LLC PO BOX 9250 VALLEJO CA 94591 4,062.10 37 CE21-000526 1700 GAYNOR AVE 529-150-001-4 SIMS DAROLD 46 MADRONA ST MILL VALLEY CA 94941 4,725.30 38 CE21-000534 1711 HELLINGS AVE 530-190-019-6 GUTIERREZ MARCO A & RUTH A 1711 HELLINGS AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 3,425.10 39 CE21-000542 1405 RHEEM AVE 530-070-018-3 ADAMS L Z 1405 RHEEM AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 3,800.20 40 CE21-000634 217 S 39TH ST #223 513-061-017-2 ROYTMAN LAURA 2934 HILLTOP MALL RD 126 SAN PABLO CA 94806 9,400.30 41 CE21-000635 1710 GAYNOR AVE 529-150-002-2 ANA MILAGRO JARILLO SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST 1733 CHANSLOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 4,725.30 42 CE21-000649 830 20TH ST 529-170-001-0 GRIFFIN CARLOS A 830 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 2,875.10 43 CE21-000655 1421 COALINGA AVE 530-260-018-3 GUTIERREZ ANA T 1421 COALINGA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 9,675.30 44 CE21-000659 1524 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 514-310-004-7 WU LI QIN 1524 PENNSYLVANIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 6,650.30 45 CE21-000661 1511 ESMOND AVE 529-030-017-6 HERNANDEZ LUIS FRANCISCO C 1511 ESMOND AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2,875.10 46 CE21-000670 400 20TH ST 514-120-025-2 LINHART ROBERT R 1171 MUNICH ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 3,150.10 47 CE21-000681 1423 GARVIN AVE 529-130-030-8 ADKINS GLORIA 1423 GARVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 4,725.30 48 CE21-000682 1625 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 529-252-008-6 BOLANOS PATRICIA V 1625 PENNSYLVANIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2,875.10 49 CE21-000687 609 19TH ST 514-280-017-5 DAGLOW STANLEY V 4209 JENKINS WAY SAN PABLO CA 94806 4,725.30 50 CE21-000697 1109 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 534-052-006-2 XENOSYS LLC 850 JAMESTOWN AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94124 4,725.30

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

RECEIVABLES FOR UNPAID CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES
May 1, 2020 thru April 30, 2022

51 CE21-000699 223 S 47TH ST 513-322-037-5 MIRAFLORES COMM DEVCO LLC PO BOX 1148 MILL VALLEY CA 94942 8,575.30 52 CE21-000710 1758 ESMOND AVE 529-090-008-2 URIARTE JESUS A 1758 ESMOND AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2,875.10 53 CE21-000717 1300 COALINGA AVE 530-270-008-2 BRITO LUCIANA A 1335 GAYNOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 4,350.20 54 CE21-000720 428 S 9TH ST 550-301-008-3 PEREZ ARTHURO JR BALTODANO JESSICA 428 S 9TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 3,250 55 CE22-000001 3512 WALL AVE 513-153-019-7 PLASCENCIA ROBERTO 3512 WALL AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3,596 56 CE22-000016 3531 CENTER AVE 513-044-019-0 MASON THELMA 3531 CENTER AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4,325 57 CE22-000024 639 16TH ST 514-310-008-8 PINGUELO JOSEPH M 24 HIGHGATE RD KENSINGTON CA 94707 2,875.10 58 CE22-000031 1726 COSTA AVE 530-090-004-9 FIGUEROA JOAQUIN A 1726 COSTA AVE RICHMOND CA 94806 2,875.10 59 CE22-000033 400 20TH ST 514-120-025-2 LINHART ROBERT R 1171 MUNICH ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94112 4,725.30 60 CE22-000061 624 2ND ST 534-221-017-5 PITRE PATRICIA TRE/VRANESH CORLEAN PITRE TRE 4330 SANTA RITA RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 2,775 61 CE22-000069 648 2ND ST 534-221-021-7 BLOUNT ALVIN & PEARL 3322 SADDLE DR HAYWARD CA 94541 2,775 62 CE22-000130 4606 FLORIDA AVE 513-322-038-3 MIRAFLORES COMM DEVCO LLC PO BOX 1148 MILL VALLEY CA 94942 2,750 63 CE22-000150 2716 ROOSEVELT AVE 515-120-021-8 BANALES MARIA 2716 ROOSEVELT AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4,000 64 CE22-000154 1524 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 514-310-004-7 WU LI QIN 1524 PENNSYLVANIA AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 3,096 65 CE22-000156 643 22ND ST 529-282-009-8 MURILLO JOSE PAZ & ANGELINA L 643 22ND ST RICHMOND CA 94801 2,846 66 CE22-000161 2878 GARVIN AVE 528-280-035-7 LU HA TO TRE 2878 GARVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 2,750 67 CEVP-000021 4305 MCGLOTHEN WAY 408-023-005-7 ACOSTA MARIO 4305 MCGLOTHEN WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 3,322.90 68 CEVP19-000036 126 S 5TH ST 550-211-024-9 DUERIGEN PETER & ORIS 14 PLAZA LOMA NOVATO CA 94947 16,500 69 CEVP20-000030 790 36TH ST 524-251-008-8 NORMAN ROXANNE K 790 36TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 12,016 70 CEVP20-000042 876 7TH ST 534-023-001-9 CREAR JEFF A & MILDRED 5845 MENDOCINO AVE OAKLAND CA 94618 14,232.60 71 CEVP20-000043 749 6TH ST 534-082-036-3 SINGH RAJESHWAR 2817 E CASTLE PINES TER DUBLIN CA 94568 5,039.48 72 CEVP20-000044 155 4TH ST 538-320-009-3 SINGH RAJESHWAR/Kaur Beera PO BOX 2279 DUBLIN CA 94568 4,472.92 73 CEVP20-000059 500 S 15TH ST 544-271-016-5 FORD ROSA M 2471 MAMMOTH WAY ANTIOCH CA 94531 4,256.03 74 CEVP20-000083 622 38TH ST 518-320-022-8 MCCOY DOLORES H 622 38TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 17,532.60 75 CEVP20-000086 648 2ND ST 534-221-021-7 BLOUNT ALVIN & PEARL 3322 SADDLE DR HAYWARD CA 94541 17,532.60 76 CEVP20-000102 140 S 20TH ST 544-052-004-6 POULLARD RUBY/HUBBARD CLARENCE EST OF 577 E WIGEON WAY SUISUN CITY CA 94585 17,350 77 CEVP20-000105 628 2ND ST 534-221-018-3 PITRE POLAND AND CASHEN MARY ANN 4330 SANTA RITA RD EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 2,682.60 78 CEVP20-000118 548 MARINA BAY PKWY 549-110-013-6 TING CHAOWIN & KEHCHYN 216 DANTLEY WAY WALNUT CREEK CA 94598 6,350 79 CEVP20-000129 4309 BELL WAY 408-012-048-0 KIMBLE PAMELAR F 4309 BELL WAY RICHMOND CA 94806 11,850 80 CEVP20-000136 808 LINCOLN AVE 534-031-001-9 SINGH SURJIT TRE 2817 E CASTLE PINES TER DUBLIN CA 94568 5,358.33 81 CEVP20-000137 555 26TH ST 515-140-002-4 VASILAS ZANNIS M & KATHY A TRE 1971 ASCOT DR #D MORAGA CA 94556 3,666 82 CEVP20-000147 521 S 21ST ST 544-292-012-9 MERCADO MAURILIO JR 2643 APPIAN WAY PINOLE CA 94564 3,766 83 CEVP20-000158 535 33RD ST 516-040-009-8 NISHIMATSU VIVIAN PO BOX 2912 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94126 12,132.70 84 CEVP21-000048 825 VIRGINIA AVE 550-242-014-3 CLAIRVOYANT CASH FLOW LLC TRE 451 LOS GATOS BLVD LOS GATOS CA 95032 14,241.40 85 CEVP21-000065 825 VIRGINIA AVE 550-242-014-3 CLAIRVOYANT CASH FLOW LLC TRE 451 LOS GATOS BLVD LOS GATOS CA 95032 11,350 86 IDU20-000813 2735 OHIO AVE 513-021-025-4 OBERG VERONICA C EST OF 93 KINGSTON RD KENSINGTON CA 94707 11,523 87 BCE17-000338 731 W CUTTING BLVD 550-030-007-3 AIR REDUCTION CO INC PO BOX 40509 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46240 5,525 88 BCE18-000195 915 W CUTTING BLVD 550-012-006-7 RICHMOND HOTELS LLC 915 W CUTTING BLVD RICHMOND CA 94804 3,325 89 BCE18-000196 980 HENSLEY ST 561-390-005-8 BNSF 303 S GARRARD BLVD RICHMOND CA 94801 4,425 90 CE19-1075 215 S 23RD STREET 544-072-008-3 KHAN TARIQ PO BOX 3466 RICHMOND CA 94703 3,500 91 CE19-000786 839 S 45TH STREET 509-370-013-5 WALDRUP BOB A SR & BERTHAM 14605 CHARTER OAK BLVD SALINAS CA 93907 3,282 92 CE19-001049 S. 5TH STREET 550-211-028-0 PETER & ORIS DUERIGEN 14 PLAZA LOMA NOVATO CA 94947 6,250 93 CE19-000937 436 S 27TH STREET 549-081-016-4 TRACY CREER 436 S 27TH STREET RICHMOND CA 94804 2,941 94 BCE19-000166 31 WASHINGTON AVE 558-122-003-4 L & P HOLDING LLC 305 ADRIAN RD MILLBRAE CA 94030 3,000 95 CE19-0009297 2105 GARVIN AVENUE 529-170-026-7 REINA E PLATERO 2105 GARVIN AVENUE RICHMOND CA 94801 3,006.25 96 CE19-000111 10 15TH STREET 540-350-029-0 ANTONIO ACOSTA/ROSE L. ACOSTA 10 15TH STREET RICHMOND CA 94801 6,500 97 CE19-000086 164 - 12TH STREET 540-270-030-5 SINGH RAJESHWAR/ SINGH MAHESHAWAR PRINCE 1230 72ND AVENUE OAKLAND CA 94621 2,896.32 98 CE19-000014 612 A STREET 534-230-021 ROBERTO & SANDRA GONZALEZ 187 HENRY CLARK LANE RICHMOND CA 94801 9,957.73 99 CE19-000908 CARLSON BLVD 513-010-020-8 VETERANS RESOURCE PROGRAM INC PO BOX 1747 RICHMOND CA 94802 14,624.25 100 CE19-001009 609 WILLIAMS DRIVE 408-052-011-9 ZANA RUBIN/VANESSA WEST 609 WILLIAMS DRIVE SAN PABLO CA 94806 4,750 101 CE19-001048 630 OHIO AVE 550-212-001-6 EALY EZELL JR 2629 BROOKS AVE EL CERRITO CA 94530 5,500 102 CE19-001049 S 5TH ST 550-211-029-8 DUERIGEN PETER & ORIS 14 PLAZA LOMA NOVATO CA 94947 13,250 103 CE19-001164 222 FLORIDA AVE 550-120-027-2 ZHANG YANTING 270 EL NIDO RD PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 6,000 104 CE19-000004 385 S 34TH STREET 513-162-013-9 HENDERSON ROOSEVELT & ODIES V 157 DONAHUE ST SAUSALITO CA 94565 3,341 105 CE19-000399 625 38TH STREET 518-310-008-9 DISTEFANO HILLARY MICHELLE 625 38TH STREET RICHMOND CA 94805 2,750

106 CE20-000093 3212 MORAN AVE 526-160-016-6 MORRISON RICHARD HOWARD III 3212 MORAN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 13,775 107 CE20-000103 600 CHANSLOR AVE 538-400-013-8 SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 600 CHANSLOR AVE RICHMOND CA 94801 2,682.60 108 CE20-000128 4040 MACDONALD AVE 517-320-028-7 4040 RICHMOND LLC 6933 SHADY LAKE LN GRANITE BAY CA 95746 3,325 109 CE20-000169 3531 CENTER AVE 513-044-019-0 MASON THELMA 3531 CENTER AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 5,550.30 110 CE20-000189 425 36TH ST 516-100-011-1 CUELLAR ROBERTO E RAMIREZ 425 36TH ST RICHMOND CA 94805 5,425 111 CE20-000201 CUTTING BLVD 549-150-004-6 STEPHENS CLAUDELL 1529 PARTRIDGE DR HERCULES CA 94547 4,069.17 112 CE20-000219 1566 MARIPOSA ST 508-231-013-6 STARKMAN BRUCE J 1566 MARIPOSA ST RICHMOND CA 94804 3,525.20 113 CE20-000236 S 17TH ST 544-332-030-3 TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO 6120 SHATTUCK AVE OAKLAND CA 94609 5,315.89 114 CE20-000239 548 MARINA BAY PKWY 549-110-014-4 TING CHAOWIN & KEHCHYN 216 DANTLEY WAY WALNUT CREEK CA 94598 4,425 115 CE20-000248 CHESLEY AVE 561-181-013-5 FIERRO JUAN & SILVIA 6304 JERILYNN AVE SAN PABLO CA 94806 6,200 116 CE20-000258 1100 23RD ST 527-180-016-0 LEE PAUL D & JANE I TRE 1100 23RD ST RICHMOND CA 94804 3,050 117 CE20-000265 STEGE AVE 513-174-006-9 ZIEMINSKI JUDITH W TRE 16511 GARFIELD AVE #B-60 PARAMOUNT CA 90723 6,650.30 118 CE20-000272 4210 MACDONALD AVE 517-280-012-9 WONG LUN HONG 21 MANDALAY PL SOUTH SAN FRANCIS CO 94080 2,775 119 CE20-000281 2533 GARVIN AVE 528-230-017-6 LEE AUDREY 430 RAMSELL ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94132 4,450 120 CE20-000317 220 S 6TH ST 550-202-006-7 TING CHAO WIN & KEH CHYN TRE 216 DANTLEY WAY WALNUT CREEK CA 94598 3,053.09 121 CE20-000320 103 S 42ND ST 513-083-011-9 HOWARD MICHAEL A 103 S 42ND ST RICHMOND CA 94804 10,500.30 122 CE20-000347 237 VERNON AVE 561-152-022-1 ZHANG YANTING 270 EL NIDO RD PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 3,050 123 CE20-000362 2910 NEVIN AVE 516-171-018-0 SAETURN KAO LINH 2910 NEVIN AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 3,325 124 CE20-000394 625 39TH ST 518-320-009-5 PEREZ ALVIN 532 STANFORD AVE REDWOOD CITY CA 94063 2,775 125 CE20-000395 534-401-017-7 FOREST PARK HO ASSN 859 N SAN MATEO DR SAN MATEO CA 94401 4,574 126 CE20-000402 2712 CARDIFF CT 414-272-013-7 GONZALES ANDREW F & CYNTHIA 2712 CARDIFF CT RICHMOND CA 94806 6,550.20 127 CE20-000403 6000 SACRAMENTO AVE 510-123-003-4 CORTESE MARGARET F TRE 6000 SACRAMENTO AVE RICHMOND CA 94804 4,725.30 128 CE20-000404 COLUSA AVE 507-262-010-6 VAUGHNS THOMAS E & BESSIE TRE 328 POMPANO CIR FOSTER CITY CA 94404 10,500.30 129 CE20-000418 434 BISSELL AVE 538-310-005-3 FRY NOLIA M 168 5TH ST RICHMOND CA 94801 4,050 130 CE20-000430 POTRERO AVE 544-322-021-4 GABRIEL GERALDINE 608 S 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 18,250 131 CE20-000432 POTRERO AVE 544-322-022-2 GABRIEL GERALDINE 608 S 20TH ST RICHMOND CA 94804 19,500 132 CE20-000487 1726 COSTA AVE 530-090-004-9 FIGUEROA JOAQUIN A 1726 COSTA AVE RICHMOND CA 94806 5,700 133 CE20-000491 5008 NUNN ST 513-237-002-3 LEWIS JAMES JR & EILEEN 5008 NUNN ST RICHMOND CA 94804 3,975.10 770,972.83

December 6, 2022

Community Development

DATE: December 6, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM:

Lina Velasco, Director of Community Development
Roberta Feliciano, Senior Planner

Subject:

Latitude Residential Subdivision (formally Terminal One Residential Project)
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The land sale of the project will generate one-time transfer tax revenue, as well as increased property tax revenue once the Project is developed and units are sold.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

July 5, 2016, July 19, 2016, November 22, 2022

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Terminal One Development LLC (Applicant) proposes
revisions to the Terminal 1 Residential Project approved by the City Council in July 2016. The approved 2016
Project included 323 units consisting of condominiums
and townhomes, associated common areas, and site
amenities on approximately 13.8 acres at 1500 Dornan
Drive. As part of a settlement agreement, the overall unit count was reduced to 316. The Revised Project proposes
to instead develop 154 detached single-family homes
and duets with 30 Junior Accessory Dwelling Units
(JADUs).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

ADOPT a Resolution for the Latitude Residential
Subdivision (formerly the Terminal One Residential
Project) either: 1) Certifying the Addendum to the 2016 EIR and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and approving a Major Amendment to
a Planned Area (PA) Plan with associated Major Design
Review (DR), a Vesting Tentative Map (VTM), and a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for park and residential
AGENDA
REPORT

December 6, 2022
uses within the Shoreline Overlay District, subject to
conditions of approval; or 2) Certifying the Addendum to the 2016 EIR and adopting the MMRP and denying
without prejudice the PA Plan Amendment with
associated DR, and VTM based on the Planning
Commission’s recommended findings; or 3) REMAND
the project back to the Planning Commission to review
the financial feasibility of the previous project and
consider if conditions or refinements can be made to the Revised Project to make the project more superior.

EXISTING CONDITIONS:

Until the early 1990s, the project site was a port terminal, leased to operators by the Port of Richmond for shipping, transport, and related industrial activities. Most buildings and structures have been demolished and removed from the site, except for an approximately 94,000 square-foot former port operations warehouse (Terminal 1 W arehouse) building that is partially supported by the existing wharf along the southern portion of the site, and some building foundations, railroad tracks, and other concrete surfaces. The site has been vacant and the Successor Agency, on behalf of the Ci ty, has completed certain clean-up remediation activities.

DISCUSSION:

The project site, located at 1500 Dornan Drive, is owned by the City of Richmond and is subject to a Land Disposition Agreement (LDA) between the City and the project applicant, Terminal One Development LLC. Per the LDA, the City would sell the applicant a ±10-acre portion of the overall ±13.8 -acre site for construction of a medium density residential project and retain ownership of the remaining portion s of the project site that would include a shoreline park and shoreline drive. The Revised Project would require amendments to the Land Disposition Agreement to reflect the updated project and any modified deal terms.

Land Disposition Agreement Amendments

On November 22, 20 22, the City Council authorized the City Attorney to negotiate amendments to the executed Land Disposition Agreement that would allow the closure of the sale to occur for a modified project with certain additional provisions such as a right of reverter to t ake the property back due to non-performance and/or failure to obtain entitlements, modified payment schedule, and other maintenance terms. The City Council adopted a resolution to give notice to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) of the sale as a preexisting agreement under the Surplus Land Act.

As stated in the November 22 nd staff report, the revised provisions sever the sale from the land use approvals, so they do not have to be granted before the sale occurs. The LDA contains the following provision:

December 6, 2022
“Developer shall be solely responsible for processing and securing all of the Entitlements required to develop the Project and construct the Offsite Improvements . . . Nothing shall be deemed to require City to grant any Local Approvals or otherwise to exercise its discretionary authority in any particular manner.” (4.1.3/4.1.5)”

Revised Project Summary

The applicant proposes revisions to the Terminal 1 Residential Project that were originally approved by City Council in July 2016. The approved 2016 Project included 323 units consisting of condominiums and townhomes, associated common areas, and site amenities on approximately 13.8 acres at 1500 Dornan Drive. As part of a settlement agreement, the overall unit count was reduced to 316. The previously approved project became financially infeasible according to the applicant, which is why the applicant is proposing a Revised Project. The “Revised Project” (or “Project”), currently known as the Latitude Residential Subdivision, includes 154 detached single -family detached homes and duets with 30 Junior Accessory Dwelling Units ( JADUs) incorporated into some of the single-family homes (see Exhibit B, Project Plans), a new wharf park, a new shoreline segment of the Bay Trail, and other site and infrastructure improvements.

The site improvements include, but are not limited to:
 the existing Municipal Wharf No. 1 will be structurally retrofitted and repurposed as a public park;
 a small visitor -serving café/coffee shop/deli and public plaza located in the northwest corner of the site at the intersection of Dornan Drive and Brickyard Cove Road will serve as a public gathering space and a gateway to the park;  a shoreline extension of the Bay Trail will provide direct bicycle and pedestrian access to the Waterfront Park and will connect with existing Bay Trail facilities in the Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline Park;
 a southern extension of Dornan Drive will connect the Dornan Drive/Br ickyard Cove Road corridor to the park and shoreline;
 a pedestrian paseo and view corridor will connect Brickyard Cove Road to the park and shoreline through the center of the residential subdivision;  a shoreline green belt that will function as a public open space corridor between the southern limits of the residential subdivision and the Bay Trail Shoreline Loop;  an extension of the Bay Trail north of Brickyard Cove Road from its current terminus opposite the main Project entry to connect with the new Bay Trail Shoreline Loop at the Dornan Drive intersection; and
 ±30 additional on-street parking spaces along Brickyard Cove Road.

Planned Area (PA) Plan Amendment

Major Amendments to a previously approved Planned Area (PA) Plan must be considered by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Richmond Municipal Code (RMC) Section 15.04.810.070.B. A Planned Area Plan amendment is deemed major if it involves one or more of the following changes (RMC Section 15.04.810.070.B):

December 6, 2022

1. A change in the Planned Area District’s boundary;

2. An increase or decrease in the number of dwelling units for the Planned Area District greater than the maximum, or less than the minimum, stated in the Planned Area Plan;

3. An increase or decrease in the floo r area for any non -residential land use that results in the floor area exceeding the minimum or maximum stated in the Planned Area Plan by ten percent (10%) or more;

4. A change in land use or density that is likely to negatively impact or burden public facilities and utility infrastructure, as determined by the City Engineer;

5. A change in land use or density that is likely to negatively impact or burden circulation adjacent to the Planned Area District or to the overall major street system, as determined by the City Engineer; or

6. Any other proposed change(s) to the Planned Area Plan or the conditions of approval, which substantively alter one (1) or more of its components, as determined by the Zoning Administrator.

The applicant proposes a Major Amendment to th e Planned Area Plan previously approved for the 2016 Project pursuant to RMC Article 15.04.810.070.B. The purpose of the amendment is to decrease the total number of dwelling units and modify the unit types previously approved for the PA (Planned Area) District at the project site. A public hearing before the Planning Commission (PC) for recommendation is required prior to City Council review (RMC Section 15.04.810.030.A) . On November 21, 2022, the PC voted unanimously to recommend denial of the major amendment to the Planned Area Plan and Vesting Tentative Map as discussed below in the Planning Commission Recommendation Section.

Conditional Use Permit in the S (Shoreline) Overlay Zoning District

Per RMC Section 15.04.306.010, the purpose of the S (Shoreline Overlay) Zoning District is to implement General Plan policies on shoreline protection and public access. More specifically, this overlay district is intended to ensure that any allowable development of the shoreline and tideland areas will protect water quality, wildlife habitats, and native or naturalized vegetation and, where appropriate, provide public access to and enjoyment of the shoreline.

The applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow for residen tial and park uses within this overlay district. The S (Shoreline) Overlay Zoning District requires any use to obtain a conditional use permit to ensure appropriate protections for habitat, water quality, and public access. The project will also require ap proval from the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC).

Subdivision Improvements and Landscaping

The Revised Project includes the construction of private streets and alleys within the subdivision which will range in width from 20 feet to 30 feet and will include traffic calming features such as 10 -foot travel lanes, short, interconnected street sections, on -street

December 6, 2022
parking on the wider roadway segments, and raised crosswalks. The residential neighborhood will have two entries off Brickyard Cove Road. The pedestrian network serving the subdivision is designed to provide residents with access to the waterfront and the regional park lands. In addition to the elements of the waterfront park described above, the Revised Project will also be responsible for improvements to the Brickyard Cove Road frontage, the Dornan Drive extension, and Dornan Drive/Brickyard Cove Road intersection.

Conformance with Zoning Ordinance

The Revised Project is in a PA (Planned Area) and S (Shoreline) Overlay zoning districts.

The Planned Area Plan is intended to specify its own development standards for the planned unit development when the design results in a superior design that what would be allowed under the base zoning district . Development of the subdivision would be consistent with the PA Plan as amended for this Revised Project. Therefore, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance.

Pursuant to 15.04.306, uses and developments subject to an S (Shoreline Overlay) Zoning District shall obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The findings to approve a CUP are included in the draft Resolution in Attachment 1.

Other standards such as minimum lot size, setbacks, building height limits, and other development standards and similar regulations of the base zoning districts may be modified as part of an approved PA district. The development standards that would guide future development of the proposed PA District are included in the modified Planned Area Plan. Refer to Exhibit C (PA Pl an Amendment) and Exhibit D (Development Guideline Modules) for a description of the development standards.

Development Standards in PA as compared to RM-1 Zoning District

Lot Size: The 154 lots range in size from 1,227 to 3,019 square feet; Applicant re quests a modification of the minimum 5,000 square feet requirement.

Lot Width: The lots have a minimum width of 26 -feet; Applicant requests a modification of the minimum 50-foot lot width requirement.

Setbacks: The Revised Project incorporates alley - and rear-loaded garages and hybrid frontages (where the homes do not have standard front and rear yards) together with reduced setbacks that do not meet the minimum front, rear, and side yard setbacks prescribed in the RM-1 zoning district (i.e., 10 feet, 20 feet, and 5 feet, respectively). The applicant requests a modification of the minimum front, rear, and side yard setback requirements to accommodate the reduced setbacks shown in the Site Plan. Refer to Sheet SP2 of Exhibit B.

Density: The RM-1 (Medium Density Multi -Family Residential) Zoning District allows for a density of 10 to 27 dwellings units per acre (du/acre). The Project has a density of 15

December 6, 2022
du/acre and meets this requirement.

Building Height: All the homes will be two- to three-story structures. Approximately 60 of the three-story homes will offer home buyers the option of including an open roof deck that would be accessed by way of an enclosed staircase. The maximum building height of the proposed residences that do not inc lude the optional roof deck would be 37 feet. Where a proposed residence includes the optional roof deck, the Revised Project would allow the staircase enclosure which provides access to the roof deck to extend to a maximum height of 44 feet. The permitte d height in the RM -1 zone is 35 feet. The Revised Project requests a modification for this requirement as part of the PA Plan amendment.

Maximum Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage allowed is 65 percent. The proposed lot coverages range from 70 to 80 p ercent. Therefore, the Revised Project requests a modification.

Common and Private Open Space: The RM-1 zone requires a minimum 75 SF of private and 100 SF of common open space per unit. The Revised Project proposes to conform to this requirement. Every home would have over 80 SF of private open space. Common open spaces beyond the required 100 SF per unit would also be provided within the subdivision, including a recreation building with swimming pool for residents of the subdivision. In addition, the Revised Project would create a new segment of the Bay Trail and enhance landscaping of city-owned property along Brickyard Cove Road and create a new public park and access to the shoreline.

Off-Street Parking: All residential units would have two-car garages, meeting the off-street parking requirement. Because the proposed new streets would limit on -street parking, guest parking is being provided in designated locations within the development at a ratio of one stall per 4.2 units.

Maximum Upper Story Massing (% of Ground Floor Footprint): The RM-1 zoning district sets forth a maximum upper story massing of 80% for the 3 rd story and above. The applicant requests for the ability to have a 100% upper story massing for the 3rd story.

Inclusionary Zoning: The Revised Project would construct its inclusionary units on -site.

Therefore, ten percent (10%) of the project units would be for -sale to households at the moderate-income level (up to 120% of Area Median Income). The City would require a regulatory agreement with the applicant to ensure these units remain affordable for up to 45 years.

Natural Gas Ban: The Revised Project would be all-electric and will not bring natural gas services to the subdivision.

Public Art: The applicant proposes to construct the 1% public art required as public art/ elements of historical relevance in the Gateway Plaza located adjacent to the retail node in the northwest corner of the site, and throughout the project site.

December 6, 2022
Conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Map Act

A Tentative Subdivision Map is required for subdivisions resulting in five or more parcels.

The project’s Vesting Tentative Map is shown in Exhibit E. The Vesting Tentative Map has been reviewed for compliance with applicable provision s of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance (RMC 15.04.700, et seq.), and determined that it satisfies the requirements of the Richmond Subdivision Ordinance. A Vesting Tentative Map is processed in the same manner as a tentative map; however, if approved, it confers a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with ordinances, policies, and standards described in Government Code Section 66474.2, that were in effect at the time the application was deemed complete.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:

The Revised Project is consistent with the Medium Density Residential land use designation under the General Plan, as well as with applicable General Plan goals and policies. The following list highlights a selection of the General Plan goals and polic ies that the Revised Project supports or accomplishes:
 The Revised Project would meet future housing needs within City limits through infill development in an area already served by community facilities, utilities, and transportation systems. (Goal LU-K)
 The Revised Project would develop a new safe, high -quality, distinctive waterfront park along the shoreline and stabilize an existing wharf. (Goal PR2)  The Revised Project would construct a new shoreline segment of the Bay Trail providing for an expanded multi-modal circulation system. (Goal CR1) The project site is designated Medium Density Residential land use classification in the General Plan which provides for single and multi -family housing types, including garden apartments, bungalows, townhouses, and stacked flats. The PA Plan includes single family residences, duplexes, and junior accessory dwelling units and is consistent with other applicable goals in the General Plan (see policies LU4.1, CR1.6, and CN2.2) related to enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connectivity, enhanced access to the shoreline, and creation of new open areas. The project is compatible with development in the surrounding area.

Design Review

Major Design Review is required for the PA Plan Amendment. Per the PA Plan Amendment, the house plans, landscaping, lighting, and signage is subject to subsequent Design Review by the Design Review Board prior to construction and will be required to conform to the PA Plan Amendment and conditions of approval.

In general, the applicant prop oses six (6) different house plans, each of which will have two (2) design style options (which reflect variations on a contemporary coastal

December 6, 2022
architectural theme), and nine (9) color scheme options. The house plans have been included for illustrative purposes only and to show the breakdown in unit types referenced in Sheet SP 1.2, Site Plan on the Project Plans in Exhibit B. Per the PA Plan Amendment, the house plans require subsequent design review.

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION:

A public hearing to consider major design review for the PA Plan amendment was held on October 26, 2022, where the Board unanimously voted to recommend approval of the Major Design Review for the PA Plan Amendment (Site Plan – Alternative B) to the Planning Commission subject to additional conditions, see Exhibit F, Conditions No. 64 -

73. As part of the Design Review process, the Applicant presented two site plan options for the shoreline area: (1) Alternative A that presented a greenbelt along the Dornan Drive side and (2) Alternative B which is an extension of Dornan Drive that would provide access to the Wharf Park via a new cul-de-sac. The DRB recommended Alternative B.

Staff supports the DRB recommended Site Plan Alternative B. Both the DRB and the Fire Department confirm that accessibility to the park and emergency vehicle access were key considerations to their recommendation. The applicant prefers their presented Alternative A.

In addition, the DRB recommended 10 additional conditions of approval to the Project.

The a pplicant objects to half of the conditions as noted in their Response to DRB Recommended Conditions of Approval, in Exhibit G.

Below is a summary of the five DRB-recommended conditions that the applicant objects to and requests that the Planning Commission consider recommending removal:

DRB Recommended Condition: Applicant’s Response:

1. The minimum bay trail setback
from any house shall be a
minimum of 12-feet.

The applicant objects to this condition because
although it would increase the minimum bay trail
setback by about 2 feet (from 10 feet to 12 feet),
it would require a redesign of the site plan, which
may result in the loss of two units, and impact the
economic feasibility of the Project. The applicant
worked with TRAC both to widen the bay trail
corridor and increase the minimum setback of
homes located adjacent to the bay trail to 10 feet.

TRAC expressed their support for this effort and
the resulting bay trail design and did not request
this condition. Additionally, when reviewing the
plans, th is condition affects only 2 of the 154
residential units, which have a setback of about
10’-6” from the house to the bay trail.

2. The units in the middle of the The applicant objects to this condition because it

December 6, 2022
project shall have a third story
limited to 80% of the floor area
below for 50% of these units.

would result not only result in a reduction in the
square footage of the impacted homes, but also
in the loss of a bedroom; would physically
preclude construction of the Project as designed
with the perm itted density and development
standards proposed by the Applicant; and would
significantly impact the economic feasibility of the
Project by reducing the home sale revenues
required both to privately subsidize the 16
affordable units and to cover the costs involved
in stabilizing the site, remediating the residual
soil and groundwater contamination, structurally
retrofitting the wharf, demolishing the lead paint-
contaminated warehouse, mitigating for sea -
level-rise, and building the public park and public
access improvements. This condition affects
50% of the 64 units in the middle of the project,
for a total of 32 units. Since the residential plans
have a vertical floor plan design, and the primary
living space is on the second story, the condition
would re move approximately 207 SF from the
third floor of the 32 units resulting in the loss of a
bedroom. It should be noted that design review
of the architectural plans for these homes has not
been completed and that, to the extent the DRB
has continuing concerns with third-floor massing,
those concerns can be addressed when the
Project comes back to the DRB for major design
review of the house plans.

3. The bay trail retaining wall
guard rail shall be hot -dipped
galvanized vertical pickets.

The applicant objects to these conditions
regarding the bay trail because these
components have yet to be designed. Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission
amend these conditions to apply where feasible
and applicable upon designing the details for the
Bay Trail.

4. The bay trail retaining wall
along the south shore and
RYC lockers shall not exceed
6-feet in height.

5. The bay trail retaining wall
shall be a minimum of 3-feet
away from the Richmond
Yacht Club lockers and shall
be maintained by the HOA with
drainage to capture and divert
water from the lockers.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

December 6, 2022
On November 21, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Addendum to the EIR, Major Amendment to a Planned Area Plan with associated Design Review, Vesting Tentative Map, and CUP. Pursuant to Section 15.04.810.040, in approval o f a major amendment to a Planned Area Plan, attached as Exhibit C , the Planning Commission recommended denial to the City Council as they could not make the following findings supported by statements of fact:

F. The proposed development is demonstratively superior to the development that could occur under the standards applicable to the underlying base district, and will achieve superior community design, environmental preservation and/or substantial public benefit.

In making this determination, the following factors will be considered:

2. The mix of uses, housing types, and housing price levels.

Staff Statement: Criterion Not Satisfied. The Revised Project proposes 154 residential units (single family and duets), with 30 junior accessory dwelling units. This is roughly half the density of the Original Project, which was approved for 323 units, then revised to 316 units based on a settlement. The Planning Commission stated that the single -family and duets housing types were not appropriate for the site, an d are not better than the multi - family units originally proposed.

4. Provision of infrastructure improvements.

Staff Statement: Criterion Not Satisfied. The Planning Commission determined that the Revised Project could not meet the infrastructure needs a nd improvements for the development and surrounding area.

Pursuant to Section 15.04.702.100 in approval of the Vesting Tentative Map attached as Exhibit E, the Planning Commission recommended denial to the City Council as they could not make the following finding:

B. Physically Suitable. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and the proposed density of the development.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Not Satisfied. The Planning Commission stated that the site is more suitable for a higher density project, consistent with the Original Project with 316 multi-family condominiums and townhomes. The Revised Project unit types of single family, duets and JADU’s are a lower density project that are not suitable for the site.

If the Council selects option 3 in the recommended action s - to remand the project back to the Planning Commission to further study the financial feasibility of the original project and to explore rev isions that can be incorporated in to the project that could result in making it a superior project - this action would not require the Council to adopt a Resolution until the project returned to the City Council for final action on the PA Plan Amendment or entitlements. As part of its decision to remand the project back to the Planning Commission, the Council may suggest areas where improvements can be made

December 6, 2022
or issues to be addressed/explored for potential revisions to the project. In addition, some of the items raised by area neighbors such as the acceptance of the dedication of Brickyard Cove Road by the City may be incorporated into the final project design as community benefits or project design features.

Additionally, while the Council is aware of t he economic issues which precluded the earlier project, that has not been shared in detail with the Planning Commission. Finally, if the Council refers to pages 2-3 above, the LDA has been amended so that the closing is not subject to the entitlement process and there is time to further consider refinements to make the project more superior as felt necessary by the Planning Commission.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMENTS:

In addition to the 300-foot mailing radius, notices were also mailed to property owners on Mallard Drive, Pelican Way, Sanderling Island and 1300 Quarry Court.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The City of Richmond (City), acting as Lead Agency, certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse #2014112050), as part of the original approvals in 2016. The City has prepared an Addendum to the 2016 EIR to analyze the physical and environmental impacts associated with the proposed revisions to the original project, per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutes (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.).

The 2016 EIR analyzed the impacts of development within the project site. The Revised Project would not result in substantial changes or involve new information not already analyzed in the 2016 EIR because the level of development now proposed for the site is within the development assumptions analyzed in the 2016 EIR. The Revised Project would not cause new significant impacts not previously identified in the 2016 EIR or result in a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. No new mitigation measures would be necessary to reduce significant impacts. No changes have occurred with respect to circumstances surrounding the project site that would cause new significant environmental i mpacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, and there is no substantial evidence in the record that shows that the Revised Project would cause any significant environmental impacts. Therefore, no supplemental environmental review is required in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166, and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15164.

ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIR AND MMRP, PLANNED AREA PLAN

AMENDMENT, DESIGN REVIEW, VESTING TENTATIVE MAP, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS:

The City Council must adopt certain findings in adopting the Addendum to the Final EIR and MMRP, and approval of the Major Amendment to an approved Planned Area Plan with associated Design Review, Vesting Tentative Map, and C onditional Use Permit.

December 6, 2022
Statements of fact for supporting the required findings are contained in the draft Resolution in Attachment 1. The recommended conditions of approval for the proposed project are also contained in the Conditions of Approval (see as Exhibit F). The attached Resolution reflect s Option 1 in the recommended actions. If option 2 is desire d, the resolution finding s would be modified to reflect the findings made by the Planning Commission as noted in the Planning Commission Recommenda tion Section of the report. If the Council chooses Option 3 to remand the project back to the Planning Commission, no resolution is required to be adopted for the project until it returns for final action.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1: Draft Resolut ion No. ___ adopting an Addendum to Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approval of a Major Amendment to an Approved Planned Area Plan with associated Major Design Review, Vesting Tentative Map, and Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions of approval.

Exhibit A: Addendum to Final EIR with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Exhibit B: Project Plans
Exhibit C: PA Plan Amendment
Exhibit D: Development Guideline Module
Exhibit E: Vesting Tentative Map
Exhibit F: Conditions of Approval
Exhibit G: Applicant Responses to DRB Recommended Conditions of Approval

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE TERMINAL ONE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT FINAL EIR (SCH# 2014112050) AND M ITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ; AND

APPROVAL OF A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED AREA PLAN AND ASSOCIATED MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW ; VESTING TENTATIVE MAP ; AND

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE LATITUDE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE TERMINAL 1 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT), PLN22-171)

I. GENERAL FINDINGS
A. Introduction. Terminal One Development LLC (“Applicant”) is proposing to construct up to 154 single-family dwelling units of varying sizes from approximately 1,800 SF to 2,700 SF square feet, 30 junior accessory dwelling units, and associated common areas and amenities on approximately 10-acres of the 13.8-acre site in the City of Richmond, Contra Costa County, California ("Revised Project”). Required Project approvals include: (1) adoption of an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (M MRP); (2) Major amendment to an approved Planned Area Plan with associated Major Design Review ; (3) Vesting Tentative Map; and (4) Conditional Use Permit for certain land uses in the -S, Shoreline Overlay District (collectively referred to as the “Project Approvals”).

B. Environmental Review Process. On July 5, 2016, the City Council of the City of Richmond adopted Resolution No. 63-16 certifying the Terminal 1 Residential Project Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) (SCH# 2014112050) and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City has prepared an Addendum , attached as Exhibit A, affirming that the analysis contained in the Terminal 1 Residential Project EIR adequately addresses the potential physical impacts associated with the Revised Project. The Addendum to the EIR was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Richmond Guidelines and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Ad dendum, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration have occurred; specifically:
a. There have not been any substantial changes in the project that require major revisions of the EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows any of the follow ing: (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; and

C. Administrative Record. The administrative record, upon which all Findings related to the Project Approvals of the Revised Project are based, includes the following:

ATTACHMENT 1

1. Terminal 1 Residential Project Final EIR and all documents referenced in or relied upon by the FEIR.

2. Addendum to the Latitude Residential Subdivision (formerly known as the Terminal 1 Residential Project) EIR and all documents referenced in or relied upon by the EIR Addendum.

3. All information (including written evidence and testimony) provided by City Staff to the Design Review Board, Planning Commission and the City Council relating to the EIR and Addendum, the Project Approvals, and the Project.

4. All information (including written evidence and testimony) presented at or in preparation of any City public hearing related t o the Revised Project, Project Approvals and the Addendum to the EIR.

5. For documentary and information purposes, all City -adopted land use plans and ordinances, including without limitation the general plan, specific plans and ordinances, together with envi ronmental review documents, findings, mitigation monitoring programs and other documentation relevant to the project site.

6. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) for the Terminal 1 Residential Project EIR, as Revised for the Latitude Residential Subdivision.

7. All other documents composing the record pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21167.6(e).

The custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City’s decisions are b ased is the Director of Community Development or their designee. Such documents and other materials are located at City Hall, Planning Division, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, California, 94804.

D. Findings. On October 26, 2022, the Design Review Board held a duly noticed public hearing to review the Major Design Review for the Revised Project Planned Area Plan Amendment and voted unanimously to recommend approval subject to additional conditions, attached as Exhibit F. On November 21, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Revised Project recommending denial of the PA Plan Amendment and Vesting Tentative Map to the City Council. After considering public testimony and materials in the staff report, including the Addendum to the Final EIR (State Clearinghouse # 2014112050), the MMRP and findings in support of the Major Amendment to a PA Plan, Vesting Tentative Map, and Conditional Use Permit, the City Council, in its independent and objective judgment, finds that the Addendum is adequate and sufficient in all respects and the findings set forth below are appropriate and support adoption of the Addendum to the Final EIR and the MMRP and approval of the Revised Project Approvals . These f indings are made pursuant to CEQA and the Richmond Municipal Code. These findings support the adoption of the Addendum and MMRP and include the findings to support the approval of the Major Amendment to PA Plan with associated Mahor Design Review, Vesting Tentative Map, and Conditional Use Permit.

II. CEQA FINDINGS.

The City of Richmond is the Lead Agency with respect to the Revised Project pursuant to Section 15367 of the CEQA Guidelines. The following findings support the City Council in the adoption of the Addendum and MMRP:

A. The Addendum has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the City of Richmond's Guidelines and Procedures for Implementation of CEQA, and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City.

B. The City hereby adopts and makes conditions of approval of the Revised Project all of the mitigation measures that are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the City that are identified in the CEQ A Findings for the Terminal 1 Residential Project EIR.

C. The City finds based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum that none of the conditions described in

Sections 15162 and 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration have occurred.

D. The City hereby adopts the MMRP for the Latitude Residential Subdivision Project, attached as Exhibit A.

III. PLANNED AREA PLAN MAJOR AMENEMENT FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 15.04.810.040, in approval of a major amendment to a Planned Area Plan, attached as Exhibit C, the City Council makes the following findings supported by statements of fact.

A. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, including the height, density, and intensity limitations that apply unless these limitations are to be amended;

Staff Statement: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The Revised Project is consis tent with the proposed Medium Density Residential land use classification, including the allowable density. The project density of 15 du/ac is within the specified range of 10 to 40 du/ac. With approval of the Major Amendment to the Planned Area Plan, the various development standards for the RM -1 base zoning district are modified, attached as Exhibits C and D.

B. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use;

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The project site is a vacant infill site located in an urbanized area with existing drainage, sewer, water, and infrastructure improvements.

The Project site is suitable for residential development because it is located in close proximity to other residential uses an d has existing services and utilities available to serve the development.

C. Adequate transportation facilities and public services, as defined in the General Plan and in the design standards established in the Subdivision Regulations exist or will be provided in accordance with the conditions of Planned Area Plan approval to serve the proposed development; and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of transportation service for all modes of travel or public services so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare;

Staff Statement: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The Revised Project will facilitate multimodal travel (i.e., pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure) . Specifically, the Revised Project includes sidewalks, multi -use paths, as well as pedestrian scale lighting, and a new segment of the Bay Trail. Per condition of approval No. 4, the Revised Project will adhere to the transportation-demand management ordinance to reduce the miles travelled by single-use occupancy vehicles.

D. The proposed development will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding land uses and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area;

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. Existing land uses surrounding the project site comprise predominantly park and o pen space, water-related, and residential uses. The Revised Project will establish a new residential subdivision and include improvements for a new public park and Bay Trail segment. The Revised Project will improve vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle infrastructure and connections near the site. The proposed residential use is consistent with existing uses in the surrounding area since there are several existing and proposed residential developments in the area , including detached and attached single-family homes. Therefore, the Revised Project is compatible with the existing surrounding uses, and anticipated future residential development in the area.

E. The development generally complies with applicable design guidelines; and

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The amendments to the Planned Area Plan specify development standards for the Revised Project that the project design will conform to. The Revised Project will utilize the PA Plan amendments and Development Guideline

Modules. As noted in condition of approval No. 73 and the PA Plan, the applicant will be subject to subsequent design review of the architectural plans, landscaping, lighting, and signage.

F. The proposed development is demonstratively superior to the development that could occur under the standards applicable to the underlying base district, and will achieve superior community design, environmental preservation and/or substantial public benefit. In making this determination, the following factors will be considered:

1. Appropriateness of the use(s) at the proposed location.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project will provide medium density, market-rate housing, including ten percent (10%) affordable units at the moderate-income level, which the City needs to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Without the Planned Area Plan amendment, this type of housing could not be provided under the base Zoning District’s regulations. Several of the surrounding residential developments in the area were also developed as Planned Area districts that include d deviations from development standards such as setbacks, height, and minimum lot size. The Brickyard Cove area is characterized by various residential unit types, including detached single family homes built on land and over the water, and attached single family and mid -rise condominiums. Therefore, the proposed Revised Project land uses are appropriate for its location.

2. The mix of uses, housing types, and housing price levels.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project proposes 154 residential units (single family and du ets), with 30 junior accessory dwelling units . Amenities will be provided, including a community recreation building , public park, and commercial retail space. Given the varying unit sizes and types, the residential units will be made available to a range of home buyers, including restricting ten (10%) percent of the units affordable at the moderate-income level.

3. Provision of units affordable to persons and families of low and moderate income or to lower income households.

Staff Statement: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The Revised Project is required to comply with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and build its inclusionary units on- site. The Revised Project proposes to build 10% of the total units as affordable units at the Moderate-income level. In the 5th Cycle Housing Element, the City was assigned 410 units at the moderate-income level. As of December 31, 2021, no units had been built that were deed restricted at this income level. For the 6th Cycle Housing Element, the number of moderate-income units increased to 638. The Revised Project will help the City provide this missing affordable unit type and would create more affordable ownership opportunities.

4. Provision of infrastructure improvements.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project will provide for utilities and public services that will not exceed the capacity of existing and planned public services and infrastructure. The Revised Project includes the installation of new water, stormwater, and sanitary sewer infrastructure , as needed . In addition, the project will include improvements to Dornan Drive, Brickyard Cove Road and the Bay Trail, which will improve vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle infrastructure and connections near the project site.

5. Provision of open space.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project will include landscaped common areas that the Homeowners Association (“HOA”) will maintain. In addition to landscaping, the Revised Project will provide a new Bay Trail segment that will run along the shoreline. The Revised Project will also create a new Wharf Park and greenbelt open to the public, expanding public access to the shoreline.

6. Compatibility of uses within the development area.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project proposes residential , open space and commercial/retail uses which are compatible uses in creating a new complete residential community.

7. Creativity in design and use of land.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project will redevelop a vacant, former industrial brownfield site with a residential subdivision that includes amenities such as a commercial building, a Wharf park , Bay Trail segment and greenbelt that will be accessible to the public. The compact development pattern will ensure that the desired medium density is achieved.

8. Quality of design, and adequacy of light and air to the interior spaces of the buildings.

Staff Statement: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The Planned Area Plan sets the tenants of the building design, and the unit and building plans will be subject to subsequent design review by the Design Review Board of the architectural plans to ensure that the design is of quality. All units would have landscaped areas between units, including yards.

9. Overall contribution to the enhancement of neighborhood character and the environment of Richmond in the long term.

Staff Statement: Criterion Satisfied. The Revised Project will improve the aesthetic and economic value of the site, adjacent properties, the neighborhood, and the City shoreline by revitalizing an unimproved vacant site. It will help fulfill the City’s need for additional housing and provide public amenit ies such as the wharf park, greenbelt, and new Bay Trail segment.

IV. DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 15.04.810.030 and 15.04.805.050, in approval of the Major Design Review for the PA Plan Amendment, the City Council makes, as recommended by the Design Review Board (DRB) , the following findings and statements of facts that the Revised Project is consistent with:

1. The General Plan and any applicable specific plans;

Staff Statement : Criterion satisfied. The project site is designated Medium Density Residential land use classification in the General Plan which provides for single and multi- family housing types, including garden apartments, bungalows, townhouses, and stacked flats. In addition, the PA Plan includes single family residences, duplexes, and junior accessory dwelling units and is consistent with other applicable goals in the General Plan (see policies LU4.1, CR1.6, and CN2.2) related to enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connectivity, enhanced acc ess to the shoreline, and creation of new open areas. The project would be compatible with development in the surrounding area.

2. Any applicable design guidelines;

Staff Statement : Criterion conditionally satisfied. Although there are no design guidelines in this area, the location, size, design, and characteristics of the project are compatible with the surrounding area. In addition, an addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Report ing Program has been prepared, which identifies mitigation measures necessary to reduce any potentially environmental impacts to a less-than-significant level.

3. Any approved tentative map, Use Permit, Variance, or other planning or zoning approval that the project required; and

Staff Statement: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The project is subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) since the proposed development is within 100 feet of the San Francisco Bay shoreline, consistent with the Shoreline District Overlay. The applicant is requesting consideration of a CUP, PA Plan amendment and tentative map from the City Council.

4. The design review criteria in Section 15.04.805.040 (Design Review Criteria).

The project must satisfy these criteria to the extent they apply. Criteria Met? A. The overall design of the project, including its scale, massing, site plan, exterior design, and landscaping, reflects design integrity and the relationship of form and function in a coherent manner.

Yes No

B. The project design evidences a sense of place; does not overwhelm or adversely impact adjoining properties; and respects prevailing setbacks and the scale of neighboring buildings and how they relate to the street.

Yes No

C. The project's design elements, materials, signage, and landscaping are internally consistent, fully integrated with one another, and applied in a manner that is visually consistent with the proposed architectural design.

Yes No

D. Lighting and lighting fixtures are designed to complement buildings, be of appropriate scale, provide adequ ate light over walkways and parking areas to create a sense of pedestrian safety, and avoid creating glare.

Yes No

E. The proposed building design and landscaping supports public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street by people inside buildings and elsewhere on the site.

Yes No

F. Landscaping is designed to be compatible with and enhance the architectural character of the buildings on site. Proposed planting materials avoid conflicts with views, lighting, and signage.

Yes No

Staff Statement : Criterion conditionally satisfied. The Revised Project provides residential buildings, a community building and neighborhood serving retail/cafe, and enhanced public open space (new waterfront park, restored and repurposed Terminal One pier and Bay Trail extension) designed to create a res idential neighborhood and public spaces that provide opportunities for residents and visitors to connect with the natural environment. It enhances a currently vacant site into a residential development that preserves the existing neighborhood.

V. VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 15.04.702.100 in approval of the Vesting Tentative Map attached as Exhibit E, the City Council makes the following findings and statements of facts for approval:

A. Consistency. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Code.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The Revised Project is consistent with the Medium Density Residential land use designation under the General Plan, as well as with applicable General Plan goals and policies.

The following list highlights a selection of the General Plan goals and polic ies that the Revised Project supports or accomplishes:
• The Revised Project would meet future housing needs within City limits through infill development in an area already served by community facilities, utilities, and transportation systems. (Goal LU-K)
• The Revised Project would develop a new safe, high-quality, distinctive waterfront park along the shoreline and stabilize an existing wharf. (Goal PR2) • The Revised Project would construct a new shoreline segment of the Bay Trail providing for an expanded multi-modal circulation system. (Goal CR1) B. Physically Suitable. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and the proposed density of the development.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The 13.8 acres proposed for development are physically suitable for development of the proposed subdivision and park. The Project site is served by existing street s, existing services and utilities are available to serve the development.

The Medium Density Residential land use designation has a density range of 10 to 40 dwelling units per acre. The resulting subdivision would create a 172-parcel subdivision with 154 residential parcels, 1 1 common interest parcels, 1 commercial parcel, and 6 parcels to be dedicated to the City for Brickyard Cove Road, Bay Trail, and a public park.

The proposed density of development falls within the 10 to 40 dwelling units per acre at 15 du/acre.

C. No Environmental Damage. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, unless an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and a finding was made that specific economic , social, or other considerations make the mitigation measures or Project alternatives infeasible, pursuant to Section 21081(a)(3) of the Public Resources Code.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. As specified in the Addendum to the EIR, attached as Exhibit A , the Revised Project could result in some significant impacts to the environment related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, and noise; however, with implementation of the mitigation measures in the MMRP, all impacts would be reduced to less-than-significant levels. In addition, the Revised Project is on a previously disturbed site.

D. Public Health Problems. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is not likely t o cause serious public health problems.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause any serious public health problems because the Project consist s of development of a typical residential housing development consisting of 154 residential lots and will be constructed to meet all applicable building and safety codes. The proposed subdivision would result in the redevelopment of the site to a medium den sity residential development, including improvements to Dornan Drive, Brickyard Cove Road and the Bay Trail. In addition, the Revised Project will implement mitigation measures designed to reduce potentially significant impacts to less-than-significant levels.

The Addendum to the Final EIR addresses the Revised Project’s potential to affect the public health in several ways (e.g., generation of emissions, noise, etc.) and the Addendum to the Final EIR determined that with mitigation, the Revised Project would have no significant impacts. The surrounding land uses are also residential, consistent with the Revised Project.

E. No Conflict with Easements. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, will not conflict w ith easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The City may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that these easements will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Satisfied. The design of the subdivision and future improvements for development of the property will not conflict with easements required for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Condition of approval No. 68 requires the applicant to vacate all easements within the project site that are in conflict with the development.

F. Availability of Water. Water will be available and sufficient to serve a proposed subdivision with more than 500 dwelling units in accordance with Section 66473.7 of the Subdivision Map Act.

Statement of Fact: Criterion Not Applicable. The Project proposes up to 154 residential dwelling units and 30 junior accessory dwelling units, which is below the 500-dwelling unit threshold requiring a Water Supply Assessment to be prepared.

VI. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 15.04.805.0 40, in approval of a Conditional Use Permit for developments within the S, Shoreline Overlay District , the Project Plans attached as Exhibit B, the City Council makes the following findings and statements of facts for the proposed application as it is consistent with:

A. The location of the proposed conditional use is in accordance with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan and the land use designations for the project site;
Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The General Plan land use and the zoning designation of the project site in this S (Shoreline Overlay) zone (which is the area within 100-feet of the shoreline) is Medium Density Residential and PA Planned Area. The Revised Project would construct a residential subdivision, public park and a new Bay Trail segment. The proposed residential, trail, and park uses are consistent with the General Plan and the zoning district of the project site. The proposed improvements will also contribute to public access of the shoreline. The Revised project will stabilize the existing wharf and create a new waterfront park opening up this now fenced and vacant shoreline property for the public to enjoy.

B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect the livability or appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood; Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The residential and park uses would complement the surrounding neighborhood that is comprised mostly of residential and open space uses by creating a new residential subdivision with similar characteristics as the surrounding development and a new waterfront park for public use.

C. The proposed use will not create any nuisances arising from the emission of odor, dust, gas, noise, vibration, smoke, heat or glare at a level exceeding ambient conditions;
Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The proposed residential, Bay Trail, and park uses would not create nuisances. The recreational uses proposed along the shoreline areas are not associated with emission of odors, or producing large amounts of dust, gas, noise, vibration, smoke, heat, or glare. Security lighting along the street, parks and trail areas will be required to comply with the RMC provisions for lighting, that do not create glare and dark skies compliant.

D. The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of Article XV; and Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Conditionally Satisfied. The residential and park uses will comply with all applicable provisions of the City’s zoning code as specified in the PA Plan Amendment. In addition, the construction and operation of the uses would comply with all relevant mitigation measures identified in the Addendum to the Final EIR and MMRP.

E. The site of the proposed use is adequately served by highways, streets, water, sewer, and other public facilities and services.

Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The proposed development of a public park would be publicly accessible and adequately served by Dornan Drive and Brickyard Cove Road. The Project also proposes a new Bay Trail segment, and multi-use paths for direct access of the bicyclists and pedestrians to the new waterfront park from adjacent residential developments.

VII. THOROUGH AND FULL REVIEW
In making the findings listed above and the recommendations set forth below, the City Council has thoroughly reviewed the land use program, and site plan, as further described in the PA Plan Amendment and associated Major Design Review, as well as the Vesting Tentative Map, and Conditional Use Permit and has fully considered modifications to these elements of the Revised Project to address issues raised by the DRB, by the

Addendum to the FEIR and comments of the public on the Addendum and the Revised Project.

VIII. SEVERABILITY
Should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.

IX. APPROVALS
The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Terminal 1 Residential Project Final EIR (SCH# 2014112050), adopt findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, and other findings contained herein, adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , and approve a Major Amendment to a Planned Area Plan with associated Major Design Review, Vesting Tentative Map, and Conditional Use Permit for the Latitude Residential Subdivision Project (formerly Terminal 1 Residential Project) , PLN22-171, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit F.

Exhibit A: Addendum to Final EIR with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Exhibit B: Project Plans
Exhibit C: PA Plan Amendment
Exhibit D: Development Guideline Module
Exhibit E: Vesting Tentative Map
Exhibit F: Conditions of Approval

*****************************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on December 6, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

Clerk of the City of Richmond
(SEAL)

Approved:

Mayor

Approved as to form:

City Attorney







   






!" 

 






 

























 #
$%  


&&



























!
"
#$
%& '






 '& ( "





(
)*+

,)-&%'& .
/
 0
(
1/23
)*+
4
&&&4










56

7884
&

 '

&
 

)
 "
,
9 (
!

















,:9 (
;<
<<(


1&
3
4
% $&





 #


&



!

!
"<

"((((
=(


)
(<

%4
%

!

%4
%

7!

%4
%
&


*


 ++,&  


&&





,,

"+


>
(

,



,,

&#$&
)



?!
/
'


@ 
A!
"
##


+
&
%
#%&$'$

EXHIBIT A

 -



.













  






!" 

/ 0&$ -
 &$
&
>
(
(
1&
%

B8"3

1 0&$ 2
$


"
(
1
"3
8
%/!
/
 

 

3
4&

&
5C"

!
>


"




"

!
9(0

/*(


>!
B(




((


DE/!
/
 

 F
(!
(0
?!
00

(!


(!
* 0
(!




 (
(
((








<


0
(
G(
 

/
H(




(

I




((

1
3


"!


(

 (
*

/

H(



0

@
C 




1/H@C
3<








  






!" 





!





 






$















    #
$%  


&&   


 '& ( "    '

&
 

)
 "   


 #

  *


 ++,&  


&&   / 0&$ -
 &$
   1 0&$ 2
$   3
4&

&  

"
#$%
&









!!5 

+
&&
 ++"

!&
& .
 '6 '
+ 
 
 


'


%$

(



  
$


1  7

.



  7

.



 ++
!& 
.&

)
*


+%%
"'

!!5  &)&   6% 3  8

$
&
& 
 ' 




$
&
& 
 -

$%9 
& 
7
&
& 
* ' ')$ 
-)
& -& &&
& 
/ :;
& 
:;

& 7&3
1 :%


$% 
< 6% 
3 #
=& 

$ 1

& 3


+
9 :
&$9 
+
% * 
" !& * 
&+

 

.. */  =& 
! %&& /

"
. '
&







!
  






!" 

(
#%

,)


+
&
')$& 
)
$


  /

+
&
.

+
&



 ')$& 
)
$


 /

 (
$&  /

-





!&
7$
 7

$ 

+
$

$ .
 ) 7

.



 > 8 &&
&  8>

%



!.#%


>  #

 
* >  
?% #
=&&/ >
$


 '
+ 
 @. 

($ >A
> 7

.



 '
+ 
 > 
 ! !BBBBBB3

%



/%


> #
=&

$ 
7




 ')&&9 7

.






$


  > #
=&

$ 
7




 ')&& C 7

.



 

$


* 

> =$
!$ % '
&
 &&
& >
$  
7 .



 

> '
&
 :)
&D
+&  ) 70 0+
&


!
 &!

+
 

> =$

+
 '

 &&
&

. )
$ 
7 .



  -:-> &
-:- &&
& -
"% ) 7

.



BBBBBBB/


> 

"
+ -
 &&*1


+
& 










  






!" 

"
#$%
&









!!5 

+
&





,,
1



" 3


((
(
(










1
0



3

?(
 



4
&







5


6


14
&
563
1/2
)
<
4
&&&4

3!

*















J 
!
4
& <&


0




?



(
(
(
(



(


D>




F<




( 



0






(






 
&'%






(


*

( 
(
*









(0!
(
!

?
(0!
* A
G
(
0



(
((<



0









 
7< %
(
0*





'&
 % 



(




 
<
%
* 
@


A





(





(


>
@
)
<
&!

/
 

0

!


(




/

H(



 <

>






(

(*



(
56
"


((






(
0*




((0



 
&
(0 % 

(


%( 

(

'




((

? 0
(
1J"B(3<

" (
!

>






?
 





(



@


A




(








0



!
?







/
 

0

<








13
(

(
"




4
&
56


 





(
((

?



(
(
(




0







(

(

G 


*

 ((


4
&
56!


G(




 

5

C 
"
15C"3
((
1
* 
(
(


K
L
/


4&


3!

5C"
M (
1 





0 
(
&


3!







M (



(



6 



5C"<

"
 




>





(



/

!



!


(

"<
(


?


(



(

 ((
((



(((








5C"






>




<


 ++"

!&
& .
 '6 '
+
5C"
M (
/

&& 

(



0



(
(* 
0
(



"




( 

5

6


1563





)0
 

1)3

(

0(



(

((
*







(
























































&
H



(


(
"
 ((!

4
&
56
(

(





?0

(+








!
H*
4
&
1
563!
















J
4
&

1H
563!
 0

(

(
 



<


+
& 










  






!" 

(*

5C"
M (
/

&& 4
 0







(*(G
56


)




15C"
M (!
/

&& 3<


"
"



*
 


* 
?
*

*
 








H
56


)
15C"
M (
/

&& !
(*<
133<

(
%A0
*

(


(

"



H
56




A0

(








15C"

M (
/

&& !
(*<
133<
"
0
(
 (

 

*
 





(







(*(G
56


)
(


/

&& 4
15C"
M (

/

&& !
(*<
133<



(G !



56


)
(
*











!


(*(G
56


)
(
*


5C"
 ((!
*(


(*(
+


&< /*(
0(



(






?
G



(
(





(
56


)
<
<
<








?
(0


(



(*(
(


(



( 

(0
(.


4< /*(
0(


?
(



((

?




(

A

?
G



(
(




(
56


)
<
<
<









?
(0


(



(*(
(



(



( 

(0
(.




'< )?





(*(

!

?(


A
?


 



*

A
?
?

(


(
* 
 0





(
56
?(


(

 



)
?(

<
<
<
(
?(






?0+


3 



?







(0
(


(((



(

56


)


0
 
.


*3 /0
(

( 

?
*
(*( 


(

(
?




(
56


).


3 >0

((


 (

( 






*
(* 
?
 



*
(* !

?
 
(*( 







(0
(






!
*






(
 





0

(



 .




3 >0

((


 (
?


(* 




(

 




(
56


)
?
 
(*( 








(0
(




!
*






(
 






0

(


 
15C"
M (!
/

&& 4!
(*<
13.
(

 (


*<
(
(

!
/

4&& 3<


 

(
"!
 (



 
 ((


 (
(
(



(



?

!






 ((

0(




4
&
56!

(

(*(

(
0





>





G (



56