Cities Index.
591653_89381_Resolution_No._4-20.pdf

Richmond City Council
December 6, 2022

Document
591653_89381_Resolution_No._4-20.pdf
Meeting
December 6, 2022
Body
Richmond City Council
Pages
1
Original file
1.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

Reso. No. 4-20

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 4-20

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ON-CALL CONTRACTS FOR AS-NEEDED PROJECT

MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS, INCLUDING FEDERALLY

FUNDED PROJECTS

WHEREAS, the City of Richmond’s Engineering & Capital Improvement Projects Department anticipates managing multiple Capital Improvement Projects funded with a variety of local, regional, state, and federal funding sources; and

WHEREAS, the City must comply with federal requirements for federally funded projects administered by Caltrans; and

WHEREAS, use of federal funds for professional services, including project management, precludes the City from enforcing local ordinances during the selection process; and

WHEREAS, the project-by-project selection process for project management services can take several months and include inflated per-project consulting costs; and

WHEREAS, the Engineering and Capital Improvement Projects Department has demonstrated that the use of a pool of project management firms that have passed a competitive bidding process on as-needed basis eliminates much of the delay and additional costs associated with project-by-project bidding; and

WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City issued a Request for Proposals for as- needed project management services, including for federally funded projects, through the City’s BidsOnline system; and

WHEREAS, six firms submitted proposals on December 10, 2019; and

WHEREAS a panel consisting of Yader Bermudez, Engineering & Capital Improvement Projects Department Director, Tawfic Halaby, Senior Civil Engineer, and Dane Rodgers, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed and rated the proposals based on criteria outlined in the Request for Proposals; and

WHEREAS, the three highest ranked firms are Avila Project Management, CSW | ST2, and mack5; and

WHEREAS, each service contract with an approved firm will be for an amount not-to- exceed $400,000 over a three year period with the option to extend the contract for one year; and

WHEREAS, these firms will provide as-needed services for a variety of capital projects, including federally funded projects; and

WHEREAS, anticipated services include a broad of array of project management services, including but not limited to the following for federally funded projects: grant management; complying with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual routine requirements for the Preliminary Environmental Study, Field Review, National Environment Policy Act, Right-of- Way and Utility Certification, Request for Authorization to Proceed with Design/Construction, Award Packet, Reimbursement Requests, and Project Close-out; complying with federal and state public contracting requirements; submitting requests for funding, project documentation, and progress reports; updating the Fund Management System; preparing audit-ready filing systems; and meeting additional coordination and reporting requirements for county and regional funding agencies; and

WHEREAS, firms on the list will be asked to submit proposals for particular projects with the best-qualified firm selected; and

← All documents from this meeting