PLEASE NOTE: HYBRID MEETING FORMAT
AGENDA(S):
- SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Wednesday, August 14, 2024, 12:00 p.m.
Community Services Building
440 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Members
Eduardo Martinez, Mayor at Large
Melvin Willis, Councilmember District 1
Cesar Zepeda, Councilmember District 2
Doria Robinson, Councilmember District 3
Soheila Bana, Councilmember District 4
Gayle McLaughlin, Councilmember District 5
Claudia Jimenez, Vice Mayor, District 6
Link to City Council Agendas/Packets
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/4157/City-ofRichmond-Council-Meetings
Register to receive notification of new agendas, etc.
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/list.aspx
HOW TO WATCH THE MEETING FROM HOME:
KCRT – Comcast Channel 28 or AT&T Uverse Channel 991.
Livestream online at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/3178/KCRT-Live2.
HOW TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS:
In Person: Anyone who desires to address the City Council on items appearing on the agenda, must complete and file a pink speaker’s card with the City Clerk prior to the City Council’s consideration of the item. Once the City Clerk has announced the item, no person shall be permitted to speak on the item other than those persons who have submitted their names to the City Clerk.
Via Zoom: Anyone who desires to address the City Council on items appearing on the agenda, must raise their hand once public comment is open. The public speakers attending in person will be called first, followed by Zoom participants. Only those public speakers that have their hand raised once the speakers are called will be recognized.
Open Session and City Council: Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://zoom.us/j/99312205643?pwd=MDdqNnRmS2k4ZkRTOWhlUldQOUF1Zz09
Passcode: ccmeeting
By iPhone one-tap: US: +16699006833,,99312205643# or +13462487799,,99312205643# By Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592
Webinar ID: 993 1220 5643
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aehrwCgISx
To comment by video conference: click on the Participants button at the bottom of your screen and select the “Raise Your Hand” button to request to speak when Public Comment is being asked for. When called upon, press the unmute button. After the allotted time, you will then be re-muted. **
To comment by phone: you will be prompted to “Raise Your Hand” by pressing “*9” to request to speak when Public Comment is asked for. When called upon, you will be asked to unmuted by pressing *6. After the allotted time, you will then be re-muted. Instructions of how to raise your hand by phone are available at:
https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362663 -Joining-a-meeting-by-phone. **
**The mayor will announce the agenda item number and open public comment when appropriate.
Via mail: received by 9:00 p.m. the day before the meeting, sent to 450 Civic Center Plaza, 3rd Floor, Office of the Clerk, Richmond, CA 94804.
Via eComments: eComments are available once an agenda is published. Locate the meeting in "upcoming meetings" and click the comment bubble icon. Click on the item you wish to comment on. eComments can 2 be submitted when the agenda is published and until the conclusion of public comments for the agenda item. Email your comment to [email protected] should you have difficulty submitting an eComment during a meeting.
Via email: to [email protected] by 9:00 p.m. the day before the meeting.
Emails MUST contain in the subject line 1) public comments
Properly labeled public comments will be considered a public record, put into the official meeting record, available after the meeting as supplemental materials, and will be posted as an attachment to the meeting minutes when the minutes are posted: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/Archive.aspx?AMID=31
The City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted. To ensure that the City Council receives your comments, you are strongly encouraged to submit your comments in writing in advance of the meeting.
CONDUCT AT MEETINGS: Richmond City Council meetings are limited public forums during which the City strives to provide an open, safe atmosphere and promote robust public debate. Members of the public, however, must comply with state law, as well as the City’s laws and procedures and may not actually disrupt the orderly conduct of these meetings. The public, for example, may not shout or use amplifying devices, must submit comment cards and speak during their allotted time, may not create a physical disturbance, may not speak on matters unrelated to issues within the jurisdiction of the City Council or the agenda item at hand, and may not cause immediate threats to public safety.
Click here for City Harassment Policy
Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities: Upon request, the City will provide for written agenda materials in appropriate alternative formats, or disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services and sign language interpreters, to enable individuals with disabilities to participate in and provide comments at/related to public meetings. Please submit a request, including your name, phone number and/or email address, and a description of the modification, accommodation, auxiliary aid, service or alternative format requested at least two days before the meeting. Requests should be emailed to [email protected] or submitted by phone at 510-620-6513, ext. 9, or 510-620-6509.
Requests made by mail to City Clerk’s Office, City Council meeting, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA 94804 must be received at least two days before the meeting. Requests will be granted whenever possible and resolved in favor of accessibility.
Unless otherwise noted in an agenda description, all actions taken by the Council include a determination that CEQA does not apply (i.e., the action is not a project and therefore exempt from CEQA).
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office translates agendas to enhance public access. Translated agendas are provided as a courtesy and do not constitute legal notice of the meeting or items to be discussed. In case of discrepancy, the English agenda will prevail.
Pages
3 A. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL
12:00 p.m.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. STATEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
E. AGENDA REVIEW
F. NEW BUSINESS
F.1 Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 63-24 and a resolution approving a settlement agreement with Chevron Corporation
5 ADOPT a resolution rescinding (“Rescinding Resolution”) Resolution No. 63-24, which would remove from the November 5, 2024, ballot a proposed business license tax on oil refining and ADOPT a resolution approving a settlement agreement (“Tax Agreement Resolution”) with Chevron Corporation– City Attorney’s Office (Dave Aleshire 510-620-6509).
G. ADJOURNMENT
4
August 14, 2024
City Attorney's Office
DATE: August 14, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM:
Dave Aleshire, City Attorney
Subject:
Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 63 -24 and a
resolution approving a settlement agreement with Chevron Corporation
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City would not present for voter approval a proposed business license tax on oil refining which undoubtedly
would have been subject to extensive litigation and
instead, the City has a binding agreement with Chevron
to pay $550M over ten (10) years to the City’s General
Fund.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 63-24 on June
18, 2024 to place a measure on the ballot for the
November 5, 2024 election to allow voters of the City to impose a business license tax on oil refining in the City in addition to other taxes on that activity.
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
Chevron Corporation proposed a Tax Settlement
Agreement to pay $300M to the City which has been
negotiated up to $550M if the Council removes the
proposed business license tax on oil refining from the
November 5, 2024 ballot. This resolution would allow the agreement to eliminate pending and future litigation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
ADOPT a resolution rescinding (“Rescinding Resolution”) Resolution No. 63-24, which would remove from the
November 5, 2024, ballot a proposed business license
tax on oil refining and ADOPT a resolution approving a
settlement agreement (“Tax Agreement Resolution”) with
Chevron Corporation– City Attorney’s Office (Dave
Aleshire 510-620-6509).
AGENDA
REPORT
5
August 14, 2024
DISCUSSION:
INTRODUCTION. A 2010 settlement agreement between the City and Chevron regarding its payments to the City expires in mid-2025. That agreement provided $114M in funding to the City over 15 years. The City can impose new taxes on Chevron with the expiration of the 2010 agreement.
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 63-24 on June 18, 2024 to place a measure on the ballot for the November 5, 2024 election to allow voters to impose a business license tax on oil refining in the City in addition to other taxes on that activity. If approved by a simple majority of voters, the tax would require Chevron to pay $1 per barrel of oil refined in the City for the 50-year life of the tax. Estimates of the likely proceeds of the tax vary because they require predictions of the future of the oil industry in general, and of Chevron’s Richmond refinery in particular. However, the City’s Finance Director has estimated those receipts at $60 to $90 million per year, based on refinery production data in past years.
The Coalition for Richmond’s Future, which alleges that is “a recently formed non-profit,” and Daniela Dickey, a City resident, sued the City challenging the form of question the City Council approved to describe the proposed refining tax on the November 2024 ballot. The Contra Costa Superior Court has issued a tentative ruling requiring changes to that form of question, but the parties have yet had opportunity to argue the case to the court.
In addition, Chevron has stated its view that the ballot measure has legal flaws and made clear its intention to sue to challenge the tax if voters approve it. The City disagrees with Chevron’s legal critique, but cannot deny that litigation is likely and may be long-lasting and expensive. The Los Angeles County City of Carson adopted a similar refining tax in 2017 and the matter is still in litigation and the City has not been able to spend any of the tax revenue.
THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. Chevron and the City Attorney, supported by a City Council ad hoc committee, have negotiated a settlement agreement that would end the current lawsuit and the threat of new ones. It has these essential terms:
The City will remove the refining tax from the November 2024 ballot, but it and its voters (acting by initiative) retain the power to impose new taxes on Chevron and other businesses in the City. The Council must act by August 14, 2024 to remove the measure from the ballot — the Elections Code deadline to do so. While Chevron’s initial offer was $300M ($30M per year) Chevron will pay the City $550M over 10 years ($50M per year for 5 years and $60M per year for 5 6
August 14, 2024
years). This will be general fund money and Chevron will not take public credit for any of its expenditures.
Chevron will pay the City’s Measure U business license tax, the City’s utility users tax at current rates. Property taxes paid to Contra Costa County for the benefit of the state, county, city, school districts, and other local governments, will not be affected.
The City or its voters are still permitted impose new taxes on Chevron during the 10-year life of this proposed agreement. However, from the payments Chevron agrees to make under this agreement Chevron is permitted a credit of the payments against those new taxes. This ensures Chevron gets the benefit of its bargain. A similar provision appears in the 2010 settlement agreement that expires next year.
The Council’s Options. The City Council has these options with respect to the proposed agreement:
Approve it, remove the tax measure from the November ballot and accept the agreed payments to create certainty and to avoid litigation. Disapprove it and allow voters to decide whether to impose the tax and defend the litigation that will likely follow.
Continue to negotiate. This would likely prevent the Council from removing the measure from the ballot (which it must do by August 14th) and lead to an energetic campaign on the measure and, perhaps, renewed settlement discussions if it passes, but a significant reduction in income to the City if it does not.
The first option is recommended due to the fact that the payments under the Tax Agreement are in the range of the tax ordinance and the Tax Agreement avoids uncertainties: an election and litigation and delays in receiving the funds.
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – Resolution rescinding Resolution 63-24
Attachment 2 – Resolution approving settlement agreement with Chevron Corporation
Attachment 3 – Resolution 63-24
7 Reso. No. __-__
370512.2
RESOLUTION NO. __ -__
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CHEVRON
CORPORATION
WHEREAS , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 63-24 on June 18, 2024 to place a measure on the ballot for the November 5, 2024 election to allow voters of the City to impose a business license tax on oil refining in the City in addition to other taxes on that activity (“the ballot measure”); and
WHEREAS , Chevron Corporation alleges the ballot measure exceeds the City’s legal authority and the Coalition for Richmond’s Future, which describes itself as “a newly formed non-profit organization,” has sued to challenge the ballot label by which it is to be presented to the voters; and
WHEREAS , Chevron Corporation has proposed an agreement by which it would commit to millions of dollars of payments to the City to provide City general services if the City will agree to remove the ballot measure from the November ballot (“the agreement”); and
WHEREAS , the agreement will achieve the purposes of the ballot measure and eliminate pending and threatening litigation, allowing certainty of Chevron’s obligations to the City for the benefit of both parties; and
WHEREAS , the agreement does not, and cannot, contract away the power of the City Council, and voters acting by initiative, to propose taxes on business activity in the City; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richmond, as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 2. The City Attorney is authorized to negotiate further, non-substantive changes to the agreement and the Mayor is authorized to sign such an amended agreement.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
******************************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a special meeting thereof held August 14, 2024, by the following vote:
8 Reso. No. __-__
370512.2
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
_____PAMELA CHRISTIAN_____
CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
EDUARDO MARTINEZ_____
Mayor
Approved as to form:
DAVE ALESHIRE___________
City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa :ss.
City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. __-__, finally passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a special meeting held on August 14, 2024.
_______________________________________
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
9 Reso. No. __-__
370512.2
Exhibit A to Resolution No. __-__
Near-Final Text of
Agreement between City of Richmond and Chevron Corporation Approved August 14, 2024
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33