1300 Clay Street, Suite 350
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 645-1238
www.moffattnichol.com
September 20, 2024
Charles Gerard
Port Director
Port of Richmond
1322 Canal Blvd, Richmond, CA 94804
Reference: Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment Proposal an d Fee Estimate Revision 1
Dear Mr. Gerard:
In response to your September 13, 2024 letter concerning the Po rt of Richmond Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Assessment, we are pleased to submit thi s revised proposal and fee estimate. As requested, Moffatt & Nichol and Liftech Consultant s have formed a single team to deliver this assessment work for the Port:
• Moffatt & Nichol to serve as prime consultant with Matt Trowbr idge serving as project manager and main point of contact
• Liftech to lead evaluation of Berths 5-8
• Moffatt & Nichol to lead evaluation of the graving basins and finger piers • Power Engineering Construction Company will provide constructa bility review and cost estimating services
• ENGEO will provide the geotechnical assessment
• Liftech to provide a rapid visual inspection of the existing W hirley crane next to Basin 5 and provide recommendations to the Port
We have revised the attached scope and fee per this approach and to address all of the comments in your September 13, 2024 letter. Our team is excited to suppo rt the Port of Richmond on this assignment. Please contact me at (510) 788-5959 or [email protected] at any time to discuss the contents of this proposal.
Very truly yours,
MOFFATT & NICHOL
Matthew Trowbridge, PE, SE
Vice President
Office: 510-788-8959
Cell: 562-505-2138
[email protected]
1 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
Scope of Work
The proposed scope of work includes the following tasks:
1. Project Management
2. Meetings
3. Data Review
4. Above Water Routine Inspection
5. Condition Assessment Report
Task 1: Project Management
This task includes project management hours to lead the M&N team. Work includes project control tasks such as monthly invoicing and subconsultant management. B udget assumes 1 hour per week over 22 weeks.
Deliverable: Monthly invoice
Task 2: Meetings
This task includes budget allowance for the kickoff meeting and biweekly virtual progress meetings. The purpose of the biweekly progress meetings is for the Port to ask questions and to direct the focus of the assessment. Budget assumes 1.5 hours pe r week over 22 weeks. All meetings assume attendance by 3 members of the M&N team. At the Port’s request, M&N will attend at least two and up to three city council meetings to present the findings of the assessment in Microsoft PowerPoint.
Deliverables:
• Meeting notes via email
• City Council Presentation Slides (.ppt and .pdf)
Task 3: Data Review
M&N will confirm we have all required documents needed to progress the work. Note that the Port has confirmed via the RFP and the September 13, 2024 letter tha t some existing information is available. M&N will review and request any required documents n ot currently in hand from the Port through a Data Gap Memorandum. Examples of documents that will be requested to progress the work include, but are not limited to, the following:
• As-built / record drawings including existing dwg files • Previous inspection and condition assessment reports
• Previous geotechnical data and recommendation reports at the s ite • Recent topographic, boundary, and bathymetric surveys and util ity data at the site • Previous engineering assessments, calculations, and reports • Previous construction records (e.g. pile driving records) • Historical data from the Kaiser shipyard construction • Photographs and drawings of the finger piers
• Liftech to provide geotechnical information from previous work at Berths 7 and 8
2 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
Note that M&N and the Port should check with operators/tenants and contractors to compile additional records that may not be in current possession by the Port.
Deliverable: Data Gap Memorandum
Task 4: Above Water Routine Inspection
Prior to mobilization, the M&N team will prepare an inspection safety plan and activity hazard analysis to plan the field work based on site specific conditio ns. The safety plan will be shared with the Port and Tenants for review and approval prior to mobilization to site.
The M&N team will perform an above water routine inspection in accordance with American Society of Civil Engineers Waterfront Facilities Inspection and Assessment No. 130 (ASCE No. 130). The intent of the inspection is to assess the general con dition of the structure, assign a Condition Assessment Rating, and make recommendations for next steps. The work includes above deck and above water, below deck visual inspection by a 2 -man crew (unless otherwise noted) led by a senior engineer-inspector.
• Graving basin and finger piers inspections will be completed b y M&N inspection staff using M&N’s inspection skiff assuming it can be launched from and sto red at the PPMT for the duration of the inspection work.
• Berths 5-8 inspections will be completed by Liftech inspection staff using Power Engineering Construction’s inspection boat.
The following durations and special conditions are noted for each structure:
• Inspection Planning and Mobilization
o 8 hours to prepare and review pre-inspection safety plan and a ctivity hazard analysis, prepare equipment for mobilization, and demobilize from site.
• Berth 7-8:
o Wharf: 1,550 ft long x 40 ft wide = 60,000 SF
o Backlands: 1,550 ft long x 75 ft wide = 116,000 SF
Outer wharf and topside, 2-man = 1 day
Inner wharf, 2-man = 1 day with confined space entry
access/equipment/supervision provided by Power Engineering
• Berth 5-6:
o Wharf: 740 ft long x 47 ft wide = 35,000 SF
o Backlands: 475 ft long x 50 ft wide = 24,000 SF
Above deck and above water, 2-man = 1 day
• Graving Basins:
o ~7,000 ft of berthing line
o 6 graving basin structures at 610 ft x 35 ft each = 128,000 SF Above deck, 2-man = 0.5 day
Below deck, 2-man on foot = 1.5 days
Above water, 2-man with inspection skiff = 1 day
• Finger Piers:
o 2 finger piers at 550 ft x 48 ft each = 52,500 SF
3 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
Above deck, 2-man = 0.5 day
Below deck, 2-man with inspection skiff to as-built = 1 day
• Geotechnical Inspection:
o The M&N team has budgeted for a day of inspection for 1 geotec hnical engineer from ENGEO to participate in inspection activities with Liftech and Power at Berth 5-8.
The M&N team will summarize the results of the inspection in an inspection report including an executive summary, introduction, site description, inspection a pproach summary, observed conditions, photos, assignment of condition ratings for each ma jor structural element per ASCE No. 130, and recommendations.
Deliverables:
• Site-specific pre-inspection safety plan
• Above Water Inspection Report (.doc and .pdf and electronic tr ansfer of all photos generated during inspection)
Task 5: Condition Assessment Report
The following work will be completed during this task:
• Task 5.1: Geotechnical Characterization Report
• Task 5.2: Settlement Evaluation between Berths 6/7
• Task 5.3: Erosion Evaluation behind Berth 5-6
• Task 5.4: Erosion Evaluation behind Berth 7-8
• Task 5.5: Expand Operations at Berth 7-8
• Task 5.6: Load Rating at Graving Basins
• Task 5.7: Whirley Crane Recommendations
• Task 5.8: Project Planning
• Task 5.9: Cost Estimates
• Task 5.10: Condition Assessment Report
Task 5.1: Geotechnical Characterization Report
M&N subconsultant, ENGEO, will perform a review of existing con struction documentation, geotechnical reports, and other documents provided by the Port of Richmond for geotechnical and geological data in order to characterize the subsurface con ditions. ENGEO will use this information, as well as any publicly available historical topographic maps or aerial photographs to create a geotechnical characterization report for the subject p ortions of the Port. This document will be valuable as a basis for future analyses for assessments, upgrades, and repairs. In support of this report, ENGEO will perform a limited amount of shoreline slope stability (if necessary based on observations during site inspections) as well as develop a range of likely vertical capacities for pile foundations based on pile diameter and depth for up to four pile types/diameter combinations at three different subsurface profiles. Additionally, a bearing capacity estimate for the graving basin structures will be provided.
Deliverable: Geotechnical Characterization Report (.doc and .pdf)
4 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
Task 5.2: Settlement Evaluation between Berths 6/7
Based on the results of the Task 4 Above Water Inspection, Liftech will assess and document the likely cause of settlement observed between Berths 6/7.
Task 5.3: Erosion Evaluation behind Berth 5-6
Based on the results of the Task 4 Above Water Inspection, Liftech will assess and document the likely cause of erosion observed behind Berth 5-6.
Task 5.4: Erosion Evaluation behind Berth 7-8
Based on the results of the Task 4 Above Water Inspection, Liftech will assess and document the likely cause of erosion observed behind Berth 7-8.
Task 5.5: Expand Operations at Berth 7-8
Based on information collected during Task 2 Data Review and results from Task 5.1 Geotechnical Characterization Report, Liftech will evaluate options to increase the load capacity of Berths 7-8 to accommodate tractors, farm equipment, heavy pr oject cargo, and mobile harbor cranes.
Task 5.6: Load Rating at Graving Basins
Based on information collected during Task 2 Data Review and results from Task 4 Above Water Inspection and Task 5.1 Geotechnical Characterization Report , M&N will perform a load rating calculation for vertical operational loads at the Graving Basins.
Task 5.7: Whirley Crane Recommendations
Given the marine environment and the crane’s age, we anticipate that corrosion may have compromised its structural integrity, mechanical functionality, and accessibility, potentially increasing hazards in certain areas. Liftech will perform one-d ay visual inspection of the crane, identifying structural, mechanical, and electrical deficiencies in need of repair from public safety consideration, such as risk of collapse. We will provide qualit ative concepts for securing the at- risk crane components. Based on this initial assessment, we wi ll develop recommendations for the work required to secure the cranes. A short report will be provided with photos, findings, recommendations, and ROM of cost estimate.
Deliverable: Whirley Crane Reports (.doc and .pdf)
Task 5.8: Project Planning
Based on the results of all tasks above, the M&N team will work closely with the Port to develop a list of potential projects (up to 10). The M&N team will incl ude opportunities for expansion of operations with minimal capital investment.
As part of this task, M&N will host an Independent Technical Re view Workshop. The 4-hour workshop will gather senior marine engineers from across M&N to review the results of the
5 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
inspection and advise on best path forward based on their experience working on similar projects throughout the US. This workshop will be covered by M&N and not charged to the Port of Richmond.
Task 5.9: Cost Estimates
M&N subconsultant, Power Engineering Construction, will prepare budgetary cost estimates for the potential projects (up to 10). The estimates will be prepar ed consistent with AACE International Class 5 accuracy (-30% / +50%) consistent with the level of design (planning phase, concept screening).
Deliverable: Cost Estimates
Task 5.10: Condition Assessment Report
A Condition Assessment Report will be prepared to summarize the work completed during Task
5. All subtasks will have a section of the report documenting the results of the subtask. The report will include a prioritized project list sorted by need, opportunity, urgency, and cost. The M&N Team will work closely with the Port to identify a sequencing approa ch for the proposed projects to minimize potential impact to port operations. An executive summ ary will prepared to provide an overview of the outcomes of the work for decision makers. The f inal report will include the following:
• Summary of conditions found during field investigation. • Recommendations for urgent repairs to maintain service of the facilities. • Recommendations for short-, mid-, and long-term repairs/ upgra des along with associated budgets. This will be formatted into a 5-, 10-, and 20-year capital expenditure plan. • Recommendations for next steps that may include additional inv estigations and materials testing to help refine the recommendations.
M&N will schedule a meeting to present the draft condition repo rt to the Port. All Port comments received on the draft report will be documented in a comment tr acking log and formal responses will be documented.
Deliverable: Condition Assessment Report (.doc and .pdf)
6 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
Schedule
The project scope and fee estimate are based the following schedule:
Notice to Proceed (NTP) November 2024
Data Gap Memorandum Within 2 weeks of NTP
Site-Specific Pre-Inspection Safety Plan December 2024
Above Water Inspections December 2024 and January 2025 Geotechnical Characterization Report January 17, 2025
Above Water Inspection Report February 14, 2025
Draft Condition Assessment Report March 7, 2025
Final Condition Assessment Report March 28, 2025
Note that the RFP asks for a meeting with Port staff at 8 weeks into the project and prior to release of final assessment. We propose that our biweekly meetings with the Port can be used to review progress of the work and closely coordinate on key findings and path forward. We also envision that separate meetings will be scheduled to review the results of the inspection and to present the draft condition assessment report to the Port.
The schedule is based on NTP being received at the end of November. However if the NTP is received sooner the schedule can shift to the left. We understand the Port will need input by the end of 2024 to plan budgets for 2025 and beyond - M&N will plan to provide reasonable assumptions to the Port to use for budget planning regardless of the how far the assessment work has progressed.
Fee Estimate
The following budget allowance is proposed on a time and materi als not-to-exceed (T&M NTE) or lump sum basis, whichever the Port prefers. Refer to the att achment for a detailed hours and cost summary table.
Task
No. Task Description Total
1 Project Management $9,750
2 Meetings $15,500
3 Data Review $20,500
4 Above Water Rapid Inspection $63,250
5 Condition Assessment Report $141,000
Total (without confined space work) $250,000
Confined Space Entry $9,000
Total (with confined space work included) $259,000
7 Port of Richmond PPMT Assessment
Proposal and Fee Estimate R1
Assumptions
1. Inspection work assumes 8-10 hour days.
2. All necessary site access is assumed to be provided by and/o r coordinated by the Port.
We will coordinate closely with the Port to plan the inspections and assume the sites will be readily accessible for inspection on the agreed days. Power Engineering Construction will provide manhole and confined space access for Liftech to perform inspection behind the bulkhead wall at Berths 6-8.
3. No weather delays are budgeted. Our team is local so if the weather is not favorable then the inspection day will be deferred to the next available good weather day with no impact to budget.
4. We assume the M&N inspection skiff can be launched from and safely stored overnight at a secure location at the Point Potrero Marine Terminal for the duration of the inspection work.
5. Our proposal does not include underwater inspection, materia l sampling / testing, or other advanced inspection and testing approaches at this time.
6. All required site data will be provided by the Port. No site surveys or geotechnical investigation is required.
7. No lateral analysis will be completed at this time (seismic, mooring, berthing, etc.)
8. No inspection of buildings is included. No inspection of fac ility utilities or systems is included.
9. All deliverables include draft and final submission for Port review. The project budget assumes one round of Port comments for each draft deliverable. The reviews will be in parallel with the work, such that progress can continue during reviews.
10. All deliverables will be provided electronically. No hard copy submittals are included.
11. A budget allowance of $1,000 is included for approved expenses.
Attachments
• Detailed Fee Estimate
• September 13, 2024 Letter from Port of Richmond
Port of Richmond
Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment
Moffatt & Nichol - Fee Estimate
Task
No. Task Description M&N Cost Sub Cost Sub Mark-up Other Direct Costs Total Total
(Rounded)
1 Project Management $7,436 $2,040 $204 $0 $9,680 $9,750 2 Meetings $9,351 $5,481 $548 $0 $15,380 $15,500
3 Data Review $3,376 $15,622 $1,562 $0 $20,560 $20,500
4 Above Water Rapid Inspection $38,676 $21,652 $2,165 $1,000 $63,493 $ 63,250 5 Condition Assessment Report $34,434 $96,792 $9,679 $0 $140,905 $141, 000 $93,273 $141,587 $14,159 $1,000 $250,019 $250,000
Add Confined Space $0 $8,064 $806 $0 $8,870 $9,000
Total (with confined space) $93,273 $149,651 $14,965 $1,000 $258,889 $259,000 Detailed Summary Table
Task
No. Task Description M&N Cost Sub Cost Sub Mark-up Other Direct Costs Total
1 Project Management $7,436 $2,040 $204 $9,680
2 Meetings $9,351 $5,481 $548 $15,380
3 Data Review $3,376 $15,622 $1,562 $20,560
4 Above Water Rapid Inspection $0
4.1 Pre-Inspection Safety Plan & Mob Prep $2,242 $0 $2,242
4.2 Inspection $20,746 $21,652 $2,165 $1,000 $45,563
4.3 Reporting $15,688 $0 $15,688
5 Condition Assessment Report $0
5.1 Geotechnical Characterization Report $338 $11,014 $1,101 $12,453
5.2 Settlement Evaluation B6/B7 $0 $10,148 $1,015 $11,163
5.3 Erosion Evaluation B5-B6 $0 $4,190 $419 $4,609
5.4 Erosion Evaluation B7-B8 $0 $4,190 $419 $4,609
5.5 Expand Operations B7-B8 $0 $14,992 $1,499 $16,491
5.6 Load Rating at Graving Basins $7,592 $2,920 $292 $10,804
5.7 Whirley Crane Recommendations $0 $11,328 $1,133 $12,461
5.8 Project Planning $14,864 $13,890 $1,389 $30,143
5.9 Cost Estimates $1,864 $9,360 $936 $12,160
5.10 Condition Assessment Report $9,776 $14,760 $1,476 $26,012 $93,273 $141,587 $14,159 $1,000 $250,019
9/20/2024
Total (without confined space)
Total
Port of Richmond
Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment
Moffatt & Nichol - Fee Estimate
Moffatt & Nichol Labor
Matt
Trowbridge Sean Hart Martin
Anderson
Wice
Ibrahimi
Damilola
Taiwo
Azadeh
Bozorgzadeh Jim Brady Coy Butler Bill Dubbs Jack Fink
Project
Manager
Inspection
Lead
Inspection
Lead
Project
Engineer
Project
Engineer
Structural
Lead
Senior
Structural
Advisor
Senior
Structural
Advisor
Senior
Inspection
Advisor
Senior
Estimator
$338.00 $297.00 $235.00 $189.00 $235.00 $338.00 $338.00 $338.00 $315.00 $338.00 1 Project Management 22 22 $7,436
2 Meetings 18 11 29 $9,351
3 Data Review 2 4 8 14 $3,376
4 Above Water Rapid Inspection 0$ 0
4.1 Pre-Inspection Safety Plan & Mob Prep 2 4 2 8 $2,242
4.2 Inspection 2 40 40 2 84 $20,746
4.3 Reporting 2 20 48 70 $15,688
5 Condition Assessment Report 0$ 0
5.1 Geotechnical Characterization Report 1 1 $338
5.2 Settlement Evaluation B6/B7 0$ 0
5.3 Erosion Evaluation B5-B6 0$ 0
5.4 Erosion Evaluation B7-B8 0$ 0
5.5 Expand Operations B7-B8 0$ 0
5.6 Load Rating at Graving Basins 4 4 16 4 2 30 $7,592
5.7 Whirley Crane Recommendations 0$ 0
5.8 Project Planning 12 8 16 8 4 4 52 $14,864
5.9 Cost Estimates 2 4 6 $1,864
5.10 Condition Assessment Report 4 8 32 44 $9,776
7 1 1 0 3 01 6 2 0 1 2 46203 6 0 $93,273
$23,998 $30,591 $0 $30,618 $0 $4,056 $1,352 $2,028 $630 $0 Subconsultant Labor
Jeff Fippin
Principal
Geotech Eng Sr. Struct Engr Sr. Struct
Engr/PM
Project
Engr/PM Design Engr Admin
Principal
Project
Executive
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
Boat
Operator
$390.00 $330.00 $247.00 $180.00 $150.00 $300.00 $255.00 $215.00 $177.00 $145.00 $288.00 $240.00 $150.00 $142.00 1 Project Management 8 8 $2,040
2 Meetings 4 4 7 2 4 21 $5,481
3 Data Review 4 16 3 14 8 8 8 61 $15,622
4 Above Water Rapid Inspection 2 8 4 24 40 4 16 8 106 $21,652 5 Condition Assessment Report 0$ 0
5.1 Geotechnical Characterization Report 4 6 22 8 4 44 $11,014
5.2 Settlement Evaluation B6/B7 4 8 8 12 4 36 $10,148
5.3 Erosion Evaluation B5-B6 1 2 4 6 2 15 $4,190
5.4 Erosion Evaluation B7-B8 1 2 4 6 2 15 $4,190
5.5 Expand Operations B7-B8 2 4 16 24 8 54 $14,992
5.6 Load Rating at Graving Basins 2 4 4 10 $2,920
5.7 Whirley Crane Recommendations 43 0 1 4 48 $11,328
5.8 Project Planning 4 16 2 2 12 32 68 $13,890
5.9 Cost Estimates 28 8 32 50 $9,360
5.10 Condition Assessment Report 2 4 8 24 8 4 4 8 62 $14,760 26 6 70 8 8 57 179 0 64 8 36 40 88 8 598 $141,587
$10,140 $1,980 $17,290 $1,440 $1,200 $17,100 $45,645 $0 $11,328 $1,160 $1 0,368 $9,600 $13,200 $1,136 Confined Space Entry
Sr. Struct
Engr/PM Design Engr Project
Manager
Project
Engineer Field Lead Confined
Space Gear
$255.00 $177.00 $240.00 $150.00 $142.00 $82.00
Add Confined Space Entry (1 day) 8 8 2 8 16 8 50 $8,064 8 8 281 6 8 50 $8,064
$2,040 $1,416 $480 $1,200 $2,272 $656Totals
Liftech Consultants Power Engineering Construction
Total Hours Total CostTask
No. Task Description
Totals
Associate
Geotech Eng
Geotech
Project Eng Senior CAD Project
AssistantTask
No. Task Description
Total
Cost
Total CostTotal Hours
Totals
Liftech Consultants Power Engineering Construction
Total Hours
9/20/2024
ENGEO (Geotech)
Task
No. Task Description
1 PORT OF RICHMOND
September 13, 2024
Erik Soderberg, PE, SE
President
Liftech Consultants, Inc.
344 Thomas L Berkley Way
Oakland, CA 94612
Matthew Trowbridge, PE, SE
Vice President
Moffatt and Nichol
1300 Clay Street, Suite 350
Oakland, CA 94612
Subject: Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment
Dear Mr. Soderberg and Mr. Trowbridge:
The Port of Richmond appreciates your firm’s interest in supporting the Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment request for proposal. After the review of your proposals and interviews, the Port finds both your firms well qualified to support our needs. We believe each firm has unique technical qualifications that can support our effort. Thus, we would like to invite both your firms to support the study with focus on the following:
Liftech to lead the evaluation of berths 5, 6, 7, and 8. As a reminder, the key focus of the investigation is to assess why the area between berths 6 and 7 has subsided. Moffat and Nichol to lead the evaluation of the Graving Basins and the finger piers. We would like to have Power Engineers, who are on the Liftech team, support constructability review and provide cost analysis for all areas of the project. Engeo who is on both teams, should support the geotechnical assessment. As additional scope, Liftech to conduct a visual inspection of the Whirley Crane located next to Basin 5 and summarize potential concerns related to its structural integrity and capacity to resist seismic and wind loads in a memorandum. This memorandum should provide recommendations for next steps to evaluate is structural integrity.
The Port requests that the consultant team as noted above submit a modified scope of work, schedule and fee that incorporates the following:
1. The Port intends to contract with one firm that will assign a project manager who will be responsible for managing the budget, schedule, and quality of deliverables. The Port does not have a preference as to the lead consultant.
2. The consultant shall schedule and attend an online coordination meeting with the Port every other week to discuss the progress of the work. The intent of the discussion is to allow the Port to ask questions and direct the focus of the assessment.
RFP - Point Potrero Marine Terminal Assessment
2 3. The consultant shall attend at least two city council meetings to present the findings of the assessment at the request of the Port. The consultant shall summarize their findings in a PowerPoint or similar format.
4. Liftech will complete a below deck inspection of the berths 5, 6, 7, and 8 as noted in your proposal.
The Port will not provide a ladder or support to gain access. Please include this in your cost proposal.
5. Inspections shall be by visual observation by field walk and by boat at all facilities. Diving inspections are not required at this time.
6. No materials sampling or testing is required.
7. The Port will provide all geotechnical reports for the site as well as historical data from the Kaiser Shipyard’s construction. Liftech to provide geotechnical information for Berths 7 and 8. This information will serve as the basis for Engeo’s work supporting the assessment.
8. The Port has photographs and drawings of the finger piers, which we will provide for Moffatt and Nichol’s use in assessing conditions.
9. The final report shall include the following:
a. Summary of conditions found during field investigation. b. Recommendations for urgent repairs to maintain service of the facilities. c. Recommendations for short-, mid-, and long-term repairs/ upgrades along with associated budgets. This should be formatted into 5-, 10-, and 20-year capital expenditure plan.
10. Recommendations for next steps that may include additional investigations and materials testing to help refine the recommendations.
11. All materials generated by the consultant shall be submitted in their native formats to the Port of Richmond at the conclusion of the contract.
12. The total not to exceed fee should be about $250,000.
13. Please submit your revised scope of work, schedule, and fee by September 20, 2024.
We appreciate your interest in supporting the Port of Richmond. For details related to contracting please call Charles Gerard at 510-620-6792 or [email protected]. For clarification on the requested scope of work, please contact Robert Stevens at 415-533-1864 or [email protected]
Sincerely,
Charles J. Gerard
Charles Gerard
Port Director
CC Lizeht Zepeda, Alan Wolken, and Robert Stevens