Cities Index.
Written Public Comments Received 3-11-2025

Richmond City Council
March 11, 2025

Document
Written Public Comments Received 3-11-2025
Meeting
March 11, 2025
Body
Richmond City Council
Original file
2.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-richmond.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

From: Amber Hatfield
To: City Clerk Dept User
Subject: Public Comments: Agenda item Q.1 Adopt Sanctuary City Ordinance Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 11:59:13 AM
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Good Evening, City Councilmembers:

Thank you for considering the proposed changes to our Sanctuary City Ordinance. These changes will further protect the most vulnerable members of our community who are currently under increasingly aggressive threats from federal immigration policy enforcement. I am proud to reside in a city that actively seeks to adopt anti-racist policy, prohibiting our police department from engaging in the type of racial profiling we are seeing from federal ICE agents across the country. Emboldened by reckless executive orders, ICE agents are violently detaining and terrorizing people of Hispanic, Native American, and Arab ethnicities despite their legal status. No one should be harassed and separated from their families in this way and the time to strengthen local protections is now. We are all in this together.

Thank you,
Amber Hatfield
Pronouns: they/them/theirs
| Race: white | Land: Ohlone
From: Reimagine Richmond
To: Eduardo Martinez; City Clerk Dept User
Subject: Letter of Support for Strengthening Sanctuary City Ordinance Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 12:58:54 PM
Attachments: Sign On Letter for Strengthening Sanctuary City Ordinance_March11.pdf This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hello Mayor Martinez, City Clerk, and City Council,
We hope you are doing well. Reimagine Richmond would like to share a letter supporting Agenda Item Q.1, which would strengthen our sanctuary city ordinance. This letter reflects the voices of community partners and organizations across Richmond who believe in protecting our immigrant community across Richmond. Please reach out anytime if you have any questions or wish to discuss more.
--
In Community,
RR Organizing Team
www.reimaginerichmond.org
Click here to follow us on Instagram

Eduardo Martinez, Mayor Sue Wilson, Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Cesar Zepeda, Councilmember Claudia Jimenez, Councilmember Soheila Bana, Councilmember Dear Mayor Martinez and City Council, March 11, 2025 We, the undersigned group of 10 community organizations, immigrant’s rights advocacy organizations,

and

community

allies,

are

writing

to

express

our

strong

support

for

Agenda

Item

Q.1,

which

would

strengthen

our

current

Sanctuary

City

Ordinance.

We

believe

that

reinforcing

the

protections

provided

to

immigrants

in

our

community

is

crucial

to

ensuring

that

all

residents,

regardless

of

their

immigration

status,

feel

safe

and

valued.

Our city has long been a beacon of hope for those seeking a better life, and we must continue

to

uphold

policies

that

foster

care

and

compassion

for

all

people.

It

is

important

to

remember

that

our

strength

lies

in

our

diversity.

Immigrants

play

a

crucial

role

in

the

social,

economic,

and

cultural

fabric

of

our

city,

and

we

must

ensure

that

they

have

the

support

and

protection

they

need

to

thrive.

The limitations outlined in subsections (C) through (F) are especially important for several

key

reasons.

First,

by

restricting

Richmond

police

from

providing

information

regarding

individuals’

release

dates

unless

required

by

law,

we

ensure

that

our

local

law

enforcement

is

not

facilitating

deportations.

This

helps

prevent

the

harmful

and

destabilizing

effects

of

separating

families

and

communities.

Moreover,

the

prohibition

on

making

arrests

based

on

civil

immigration

warrants

and

participating

in

immigration

enforcement

activities

(subsections

(D)

and

(E))

helps

ensure

that

our

local

police

officers

focus

on

their

primary

responsibility

of

protecting

public

safety,

not

carrying

out

federal

immigration

policies.

These

policies

often

target

vulnerable

communities

and

can

deter

individuals

from

reporting

crimes

or

seeking

help

when

needed,

fearing

that

their

immigration

status

will

be

used

against

them.

The further limitation on transferring individuals to immigration agents unless authorized by

a

judicial

warrant

or

probable

cause

(subsection

(F))

is

a

key

protection

against

unwarranted

detention

and

deportation.

It

reinforces

the

principle

that

local

law

enforcement

should

not

be

complicit

in

actions

that

violate

individuals'

rights

or

disregard

due

process

protections

under

the

law.

Additionally,

we

strongly

support

the

provision

that

prevents

Richmond

police

officers

from

being

deputized

as

federal

immigration

officers.

Local

officers

should

remain

under

the

jurisdiction

and

supervision

of

the

City

of

Richmond,

ensuring

that

they

adhere

to

local

laws

and

policies

that

prioritize

community

safety

and

civil

rights.

These policies reflect Richmond’s commitment to justice, compassion, and respect for human

rights,

and

they

play

an

important

role

in

uplifting

the

safety

and

well-being

of

all

Richmond

residents.

Thank

you

for

your

time

and

consideration.

Portal  Search... 
Meeting Date
Agenda Item
Name
Email
Comment
Position
Status
City Council
3/11/2025 3:30 PM Amendments to
the City Council
Rules and
Procedures
Philip Rosenthal philiprosenthal@g
mail.com
Please cure and
remedy the Brown
Act Violation. Many
of us were
dumbfounded on
March 4th when
the City Council
announced that it
had secretly
decided to move
the meetings
forward to 5:00, a
time when the vast
majority of workers
can not attend
meetings because
we are still at work.

Further, by starting
Tuesday March
11th , at 5:00 is
also in violation as
the resolution to
start at 5:00 hasn't
been passed . That
the heck? Really, It
is not as if we can't
read or are unable
to look things up
on the interweb.

See City Council
Rules of Procedure
and Order, Page 4,
II.A.(3) and (4)
Using the Clerk's
Against Appro
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 1/9 office to
manipulate the
optics is a mess,
and still falls under
the Brown Act.

Hearing the City
Attorney admit on
the dais that there
was a violation that
needed to be fixed
, as opposed to just
not violating the
Brown Act to begin
with is shocking,
although we are
getting
accustomed to
these opaque and
deceptive
resolutions. One
Councilmember
questionable
statement that she
read something on
Google that some
guy or chick
somewhere said
something like that
people don't really
work 9 to 5 is off
the wall. In fact,
Google directs us
to the following
statistics:

According to
available data, a
significant majority
of California
workers, around
70%, are
considered to have
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 2/9 a "typical" 9-to-5
schedule, meaning
they work full-time,
year-round hours
with a standard
daytime schedule;
however, this
number can vary
depending on the
industry and
specific job roles
within the state,
attributed to
Information about
work schedules in
California often
that from the
Public Policy
Institute of
California (PPIC)
and Bureau of
Labor Statistics
(BLS) reports.

Redline states (in
2024) 86% of
workers work
some version of 9
to 5 (this is
national, and
California might
vary).

Nevertheless,
refusing the
taxpayers' right to
comment , despite
the fact that there
was a statement
that the council
had deliberately
bypassed the
regulations, makes
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 3/9 us wonder about
the integrity of our
system. Please
cure this by
redoing the March
4th and March
11th meetings (if
you move forward
in violation of the
Brown Act on
March 11th ) at
6:30, as any actions
or approvals taken
during meetings
that are in violation
of the Brown Act
need to be cured
by being redone.

KRGDS, Philip
Rosenthal
References:

GC54952.6 As used
in this chapter,
“action taken”
means a collective
decision made by a
majority of the
members of a
legislative body, a
collective
commitment or
promise by a
majority of the
members of a
legislative body to
make a positive or
a negative
decision, or an
actual vote by a
majority of the
members of a
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 4/9 legislative body
when sitting as a
body or entity,
upon a motion,
proposal,
resolution, order
or ordinance. GC
54960 (a) The
district attorney or
any interested
person may
commence an
action by
mandamus,
injunction, or
declaratory relief
for the purpose of
stopping or
preventing
violations or
threatened
violations of this
chapter by
members of the
legislative body of
a local agency or to
determine the
applicability of this
chapter to ongoing
actions or
threatened future
actions of the
legislative body, or
to determine the
applicability of this
chapter to past
actions of the
legislative body,
subject to Section
54960.2, or to
determine whether
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 5/9 any rule or action
by the legislative
body to penalize or
otherwise
discourage the
expression of one
or more of its
members is valid
or invalid under
the laws of this
state or of the
United States, or to
compel the
legislative body to
audio record its
closed sessions as
hereinafter
provided. GC
54960.1 (a) The
district attorney or
any interested
person may
commence an
action by
mandamus or
injunction for the
purpose of
obtaining a judicial
determination that
an action taken by
a legislative body
of a local agency in
violation of Section
54953, 54954.2,
54954.5, 54954.6,
54956, or 54956.5
is null and void
under this section.

Nothing in this
chapter shall be
construed to
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 6/9 prevent a
legislative body
from curing or
correcting an
action challenged
pursuant to this
section.
3/11/2025 3:30 PM Adopt Sanctuary
City Ordinance.

Louise Williams 777louisewilliams
@gmail.com
I urge you to
protect our
immigrant citizens
by adopting this
Sanctuary City
Ordinance. Our
immigrant
population is vital
to the Richmond
community,
providing talent,
ingenuity, and
labor to our
various businesses.

Do not deputize
our police officers
as ICE personnel.

This is still America,
despite what the
current
administration is
trying to make of
our country. We
ALL have rights. All
law-abiding people
who live and work
in our community
have a right to be
here, to be safe, to
send children to
our schools, to
worship in our
churches and
For Appro
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 7/9 temples. It is the
responsibility of
the Richmond City
Council to protect
those rights for all
the citizens of
Richmond.
3/11/2025 3:30 PM Adopt Sanctuary
City Ordinance.

Madison Mennie madimennie@gmai
l.com
I urge you to
support the
Sanctuary City
Ordinance.

Richmond was
built by immigrants
and continues to
thrive on their
talent, labor, and
acumen. This
ordinance is not
just necessary—it
is a moral
imperative.

Everyone deserves
to live without fear,
with dignity, and
with the certainty
that the city stands
with them. By
codifying these
protections, we
can set a powerful
example of what it
means to lead with
humanity. Too
many in the
immigrant
community live in
fear—afraid to
seek help, to go to
work, to send their
children to school.

For Appro
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 8/9 The safety,
prosperity, and
future of our city
depend on
ensuring that no
family is torn apart
and that no
individual lives in
terror of losing
everything. Again, I
urge you to protect
our immigrant
community.

Prioritize their
safety and
education. No law-
abiding person
should fear for
their life or the
devastating
uncertainty of
having a loved one
taken from their
home. Please
continue to SAY
NO to ICE in our
city and our police
force. We must be
bold in the face of
hate, fear-
mongering and
anti-immigrant
rhetoric.
3/12/25, 9:25 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 9/9

← All documents from this meeting